alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 22, 2015

No. 04-15-00645-CR

Robert Allen NEELY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR7454

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On July 29, 2015, the trial court denied appellant’s motion to suppress. Thereafter, he 

filed a pro se document with the district clerk, which the district clerk interpreted as a notice of 

appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress.

1

 The district clerk then 

forwarded the clerk’s record, which included the “notice of appeal,” to this court. However, 

there has been no judgment rendered in this case, and a defendant may not appeal an 

interlocutory order denying a motion to suppress. See Dahlem v. State, 322 S.W.3d 685, 690 

(Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2010, pet. ref’d). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a written 

response in this court on or before November 11, 2015 showing cause why this court should not 

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial court, the district 

clerk, the court reporter, and all counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

 1 The document filed by the pro se defendant is actually a request for a Jackson v. Denno hearing to challenge the 

voluntariness of his confession. Admittedly, at the top of the document, the pro se included the handwritten words, 

“Apeal [sic] To,” but the substance of the document, which controls, makes it clear this is not a notice of appeal 

from either a final judgment or a ruling on the motion to suppress. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of October, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Highmount Olympic Fund, LLC, Plaintiff, v PIPE Equity Partners, LLC, et al., Defendants. PIPE Equity Partners, LLC, Appellant, v Highmount Olympic Fund, LLC, Respondent.

Submitted August 20, 2012;

decided October 25, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the consolidated action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P (the
“Partnership”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Randall H. Breitenbach, Co-Chief Executive Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLC, the
general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.





/s/ Randall H.
  BreitenbachRandall
      H. BreitenbachCo-Chief
      Executive Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLCDated:  March
      17, 2010
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robin C. Stracey, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cesca Therapeutics Inc.;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                        |  |        | Cesca Therapeutics Inc.
|----------------------- |  | ------ | -----------------------
|Dated: October 27, 2016 |  | By:/s/ | Robin C. Stracey       
|                        |  |        | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000826345    
<NAME>                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PSHIP II-B
                                     
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                   161,478
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            312,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         474,005
<PP&E>                                21,451,475
<DEPRECIATION>                        18,994,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         3,111,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     99,440
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             2,913,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           3,111,275
<SALES>                                  516,374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         517,543
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            498,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           18,813
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       18,813
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              18,813
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
 

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 468 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 468

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Secretary 
 of Defense should review section 504 of title 10, United States Code, 
 for purposes related to enlisting certain aliens in the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2019

 Mr. Foster submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Secretary 
 of Defense should review section 504 of title 10, United States Code, 
 for purposes related to enlisting certain aliens in the Armed Forces.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the Secretary of Defense should review section 504 of title 10, United 
States Code, for the purpose of making a determination and 
authorization pursuant to subsection (b)(2) of such section regarding 
the enlistment in the Armed Forces of an alien who possesses an 
employment authorization document issued under the Deferred Action for 
Childhood Arrivals program of the Department of Homeland Security 
established pursuant to the memorandum of the Secretary of Homeland 
Security dated June 15, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 12
             COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND
         COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND
                 PREFERRED AND PREFERENCE DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            12 MONTHS ENDED
                                                        DECEMBER    DECEMBER    DECEMBER    DECEMBER    DECEMBER
                                                          1995        1994        1993        1992        1991
<S>                                                     <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
                                                                       (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
Net Income...........................................   $338,007    $323,617    $309,866    $264,347    $233,681
Taxes on Income......................................    172,388     156,702     140,833     105,994      88,041
Adjusted Net Income..................................   $510,395    $480,319    $450,699    $370,341    $321,722
Fixed Charges:
  Interest and Amortization of Debt Discount and
     Expense and Premium on all Indebtedness.........   $206,666    $204,206    $199,415    $200,848    $213,616
  Capitalized Interest...............................     15,050      12,427      16,167      13,800      20,953
  Interest Factor in Rentals.........................      2,099       2,010       2,144       2,033       1,801
  Total Fixed Charges................................   $223,815    $218,643    $217,726    $216,681    $236,370
Preferred and Preference Dividend
  Requirements: (1)
     Preferred and Preference Dividends..............   $ 40,578    $ 39,922    $ 41,839    $ 42,247    $ 42,746
     Income Tax Required.............................     20,434      19,074      18,763      16,729      15,916
     Total Preferred and Preference Dividend
       Requirements..................................   $ 61,012    $ 58,996    $ 60,602    $ 58,976    $ 58,662
Total Fixed Charges and Preferred and Preference
  Dividend Requirements..............................   $284,827    $277,639    $278,328    $275,657    $295,032
Earnings (2).........................................   $719,160    $686,535    $652,258    $573,222    $537,139
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges...................       3.21        3.14        3.00        2.65        2.27
Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and
  Preferred and Preference Dividend Requirements.....       2.52        2.47        2.34        2.08        1.82
</TABLE>

(1) Preferred and preference dividend requirements consist of an amount equal to
the pre-tax earnings which would be required to meet dividend requirements on
preferred stock and preference stock.
(2) Earnings are deemed to consist of net income which includes earnings of
BGE's consolidated subsidiaries, equity in the net income of BGE's
unconsolidated subsidiary, income taxes (including deferred income taxes and
investment tax credit adjustments), and fixed charges other than capitalized
interest.
Exhibit 10.19


 





AMENDMENT


 


This Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Investment
Agreement dated November 7, 2012 (the "Investment Agreement") between Dutchess Opportunity Fund, II, LP ("Dutchess")
and Players Network, (the "Company") is made this XXth day of July, 2013.


 


WHEREAS, it is in the best interest
of both parties to facilitate (the "Facilitation") the amendments in connection with the Investment Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the premises and mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and in reliance upon the representations and warranties contained
herein, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:


 


		1.	Amendment to the Investment Agreement.



 


		a.	The Investment Agreement is hereby amended to DELETE in its entirety Section 2 (c) and contemporaneously
the Investment Agreement is hereby amended to INSERT the following sentence as the amended Section 2 (c):



 


(c)               
SUSPENSION PRICE. The Suspension Price shall be one cent ($.01) per share. In the event the Common Stock falls below the
Suspension Price, the Put shall be temporarily suspended. The Put shall resume at such time as the Common Stock is above the Suspension
Price, provided the dates for the Pricing Period for that particular Put are still valid. In the event the Pricing Period has been
complete, any shares above the Suspension Price due to the Investor shall be sold to the Investor by the Company at the Suspension
Price under the terms of this Agreement.


 


		b.	The Investment Agreement is hereby amended to DELETE in its entirety the Section 19 and contemporaneously
the Investment Agreement is hereby amended to INSERT the following sentence as the amended Section 19:



 


Section 19 NO ASSIGNMENT. This
Agreement and any rights, agreements or obligations hereunder may not be assigned, by operation of law, merger or otherwise.


 


		2.	No other terms, rights or provisions of the Investment Agreement are or should be considered to
have been modified by the terms of this Amendment and each party retains all other rights, obligations, privileges and duties contained
in Investment Agreement that correspond respectively to the Investment Agreement including but not limited to the Registration
Rights Agreement between the Company and Dutchess.



 


 


Agreed and Accepted, and duly authorized
to sign, on this 8th day of July, 2013


 


 


	By Dutchess:  	/s/ Douglas H. Leighton	 
	 	Douglas H. Leighton, Managing Director	 


 


	By Company:	/s/ Mark Bradley	 
	 	Mark Bradley, Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the quarterly report of ES Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arthur
      W. Budich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Date:      
      November 8,
      2007                      
Arthur W
      Budich


Arthur
      W. Budich


Executive
      Vice President and Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/s/ Brenda G. GujralName:Brenda G. GujralTitle:President of the General Partner andprincipal executive officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.Date:April 30, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of Saybolt LP, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, Saybolt LP, P.O. Box 7416, Garden City, GA 31408, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                    

*http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​*

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of Saybolt LP, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on March 26, 2009. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for March 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: June 18, 2009.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. E9-14897 Filed 6-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
[978 NE2d 593, 954 NYS2d 1]

#### Summer H., an Infant, by Her Father and Natural Guardian, John H., et al., Appellants, v New York City Department of Education, Respondent.

Decided October 18, 2012

*1031APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Apicella & Schlesinger,*New York City *(Alan C. Kestenbaum*of counsel), for appellants.

*Michael*A. *Cardozo, Corporation Counsel,*New York City *(Norman Corenthal*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to plaintiff *(see e.g. Branham v Loews Orpheum Cinemas, Inc.,*8 NY3d 931, 932 [2007]), defendant demonstrated its entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The infant plaintiff’s classmate’s action in stepping backwards constituted a “thoughtless or careless act” not preventable by reasonable supervision *(Mirand v City of New York,*84 NY2d 44, 49 [1994]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,203,877
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      60,876,875
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,467,129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,907,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,030,683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,907,044
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,815,441
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,238,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,115,064
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (887,393)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (887,393)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (887,393)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (14.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1


**INTEGRATED
      MICROMETALLURGICAL SYSTEMS, INC.**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the periodic report of INTEGRATED MICROMETALLURGICAL SYSTEMS,
      INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
      September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      “Report”), I, Hans-Werner Huss, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
      Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)
       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
      as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at
      the dates and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.


Date:
      November 20, 2007





By:
            /s/
                H. Werner HussH.
                Werner Huss, PresidentChief
                Executive Officer