alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ANDRZEJ BOBEL, NEPTUN LIGHT, INC.,

Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

SATCO PRODUCTS, INC., MAXLITE, INC., 

LITETRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Intervenors

______________________ 

2014-1701

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States International Trade 

Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-872.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

SUDIP KUMAR KUNDU, The Fuisz-Kundu Group LLP, 

Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented 

by JOHN ROBERT FUISZ. 

 ROBERT JOHN NEEDHAM, Office of General Counsel, 

International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by WAYNE W.
 

HERRINGTON, SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG, DOMINIC L.

BIANCHI. 

 ROBERT STEPHEN RIGG, Vedder, Price, Kaufman & 

Kammholz, Chicago, IL, argued for intervenors. Intervenors Litetronics International, Inc., MaxLite, Inc., also 

represented by TIMOTHY MICHAEL NITSCH. Intervenor 

Satco Products, Inc., represented by ROBERT P. LYNN, JR.,

STEPHEN WILLIAM LIVINGSTON, Lynn, Gartner, Dunne & 

Covello, LLP, Mineola, NY. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 14, 2015 /s/Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
§ 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Dreams, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ross Tannenbaum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ Ross TannenbaumRoss Tannenbaum Chief Executive Officer June 30, 2003
The Honorable Edwin Powell, Jr. Opinion No. Ii- 898 

County Attorney 

Coryell County Re: Taxation of Farm 

711 Main Street Products. 

Gatesville, Texas 76528 

Dear Mr. Powell: 

You have requested our opinion regarding the construction 

of article 8, section 19 of the Texas Constitution. That 

section provides: 

Farm products in the hands of the producer, 

and family supplies for home and farm use, 

are exempt from all taxation until otherwise directed by a two-thirds vote of all 

the members elected to both houses of the 

Legislature. 

We have been advised by the Comptroller's office that, 

in 1879, when article 8, section 19 was added to the Constitution, livestock and poultry were taxed, and that the practice 

has never ceased. This raises the question as to whether the 

Committee on Constitutional Amendments of the 16th Legislature, 

which proposed the amendment, intended to include livestock 

and poultry within the ambit of “farm products," and this is 

the issue which you raise. 

In Court v. O'Connor, 65 Tex. 334 (Tex. Sup. 18861, the 

Supreme Court Gs called on to determine the situs for tax 

purposes of cattle which grazed on land located in two 

counties. The Court reached a result that was later enacted 

as article 7155, V.T.C.S. Never did the Court express the 

slightest doubt-that the cattle were taxable at &me location. 

9.W. 153 (Tex. Civ. App. -- 

r v. Johnson, 42 S.W. 866 (Tex. Civ. 

le therefore that livestock 

and poultry are not.considered to be included within the 

p. 3772 
The Honorable 

definition of 

8, section 19 

Edwin Powell, Jr. - page 2 (H-898) 

"farm products" as that term is used 

of the Texas Constitution. 

in article 

You also ask us to specify what is included within the 

meaning of "family supplies for home and farm use" under 

article 8, section 19. This question was addressed in 

Attorney General Opinion WW-1025 (19611, in which the Attorney 

General held that "family supplies for home and farm use" 

means 

consumable articles reasonably necessary 

for day-to-day use in operating or maintaining a farm or home. 

We have been pointed to no reason not to concur with the 

definition suggested in Attorney General Opinion WW-1025, 

and we are unable to supply a more definitive guideline. 

SUMMARY 

Livestock and poultry are not “farm 

products" under article 8, section 19 

of the Texas Constitution and thus are 

not exempt from taxation thereunder. 

"Family supplies for home and farm use" 

means consumable articles reasonably 

necessary for day-to-day use in operating 

or maintaining a farm or home. 

APPROVED: 

Very truly yours, 

Attorney General of Texas 

Opinion Committee 

jwb 

p. 3773
94-1143.

#### State v. Robinette.

Montgomery App. No. 14074. On motion for further briefing and oral argument. Motion granted.

Douglas, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
* This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10784 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RONALD STAPLES, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:91-CR-001-8-A

- - - - - - - - - - February 10, 1999 Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. *
PER CURIAM: ** Ronald Staples appeals the district court’s sentence following his conviction for conspiracy and making fraudulent declarations to the Immigration and Naturalization Service. He argues that the court abused its discretion when it departed upward and sentenced him to 33 months of imprisonment. He also argues that the court erred by assessing him a leadership role in the conspiracy.No. 98-10784 -2- We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of LifeCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
William Hamburg , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 220, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 14, 2007



/s/ WILLIAM HAMBURGWilliam HamburgChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  ONLINE  ORIGINALS,  INC.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2008,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory
Adams,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:    July 11, 2008


By:       /s/ Gregory Adams
         ------------------------
         Gregory Adams
         Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer
         and principal accounting officer
Order entered July 13, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00427-CR

No. 05-15-00428-CR

No. 05-15-00429-CR

HECTOR OMAR ROMERO A/K/A OMAR CANAKA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-71161-H, F12-71361-H, F12-71362-H

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeals, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 
appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeals.

 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeals 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
accompanying Annual Report of Dreams, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ross
Tannenbaum, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|    |  |                            
|--- |  | ---------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Ross Tannenbaum        
|    |  | Ross Tannenbaum            
|    |  | Principal Executive Officer
|    |  | March 30, 2011
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 9, 2015

No. 04-15-00403-CR

Kenneth Thomas Morgan-DAVIS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR4937

The Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states this criminal case “is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea 

bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the 

prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. Therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately 

reflects that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “[t]he appeal must be 

dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part 

of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 

It is therefore ORDERED this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) of the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless appellant causes an amended trial court certification 

to be filed by July 31, 2015, showing appellant has the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

25.2(d), 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State,

110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). All other appellate deadlines are 

SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification issue.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# Director’s Innovation Speaker Series: HIV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 Effects on Brain and Mind Health: A Tale of Two Viruses

### ** Date      

### ** Location

## Overview

During this virtual fireside chat, Serena Spudich, M.D., M.A.**, and NIMH Director Joshua A. Gordon, M.D., Ph.D., discussed the impact of HIV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 viruses on the nervous system. They also explored lessons learned from studying the effects of HIV on the central nervous system, similarities and differences in the pathology and clinical effects, and how this knowledge could inform research and interventions for SARS-CoV-2.

## Recording

Read the transcript.

## About Dr. Spudich

Dr. Spudich is one of only a few neurologists in the United States with specialized training in nervous system infections and a clinical practice focusing on neurological issues in patients with HIV. At Yale University, Dr. Spudich is the Gilbert H. Glaser Professor of Neurology, chief of the Division of Neurological Infections and Global Neurology, and director of the Center for Brain and Mind Health. She also is a neurology physician who cares for patients with viral infections and neurological disorders in clinics.

Dr. Spudich’s clinical and translational research explores the effects of HIV and SARS-CoV-2 infection in the nervous system, focusing on the effects of acute infection, antiviral and immune treatments, and cure strategies on viral pathogenesis and persistence in the central nervous system. She collaborates with colleagues across multiple disciplines on studies in the United States and international settings, exploring questions of inflammation, injury, and viral reservoirs within the central nervous system.

Dr. Spudich has been active in the NIH-funded International AIDS Clinical Trials Group, co-leads the International NeuroHIV Cure Consortium for studies based in Bangkok, Thailand, and serves on the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Antiretroviral Treatment Guidelines Committee, CROI Program Committee, and as the Steering Committee Co-Chair for the NIH Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) study on long COVID.

## About the Director’s Innovation Speaker Series

The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) established the Director’s Innovation Speaker Series to encourage broad, interdisciplinary thinking in developing scientific initiatives and programs and to press for theoretical leaps in science over the continuation of incremental thought. Innovation speakers are encouraged to describe their work from the perspective of breaking through existing boundaries and developing successful new ideas, as well as working outside their primary area of expertise in ways that have pushed their fields forward. We encourage discussions of the meaning of innovation, creativity, breakthroughs, and paradigm-shifting.

## Sponsored by

Division of Extramural Activities
97-498.

#### State ex rel. Kmart Corp. v. Eighth Dist. Court of Appeals.

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court upon the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------



                         SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James M. O'Connell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.




                                    /s/  James M. O'Connell
                                    ------------------------------
                                    Chief Financial Officer


August 8, 2005




[Signed originals of these written statements required by Section 906 have
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

135362 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 135362 COA: 272781 Wayne CC: 06-003240-01 RICARDO TOLSON a/k/ a RICARDO WADE TOLSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e October 23, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 54 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 54

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure 
          the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2019

  Mr. Connolly (for himself and Mr. Graves of Missouri) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                               and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure 
          the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service.

Whereas the United States Postal Service has announced that it may need to 
        reduce the frequency of its mail delivery service from 6 days a week to 
        5 days a week;
Whereas 6-day mail delivery service is an essential service that the American 
        people have relied on since 1912, particularly working families that 
        depend on the Postal Service for the timely delivery of their paychecks; 
        and
Whereas reducing mail delivery service to 5 days a week would inevitably cause 
        not only delays in the delivery of mail, but higher postal costs, due to 
        the many hours of additional overtime that the Postal Service would 
        require in order to handle the resulting back-up of mail: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures 
to ensure the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service.
                                 <all>
```