No oral argument requested 

 CASE NO. 12-15-00112-CR

 

 IN THE 

 TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

 TYLER, TEXAS

 _______________________________ 

 

 MELISSA BROWNING HERNANDEZ, Appellant 

 vs. 

 THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 _______________________________ 

 On Appeal from the 

 392nd Judicial District Court 

 Henderson County, Texas 

 

 (Trial Court Case Number: B-21,601) 

 Honorable Judge Carter W. Tarrance, Judge Presiding 

 BRIEF OF APPELLANT 

 Linda A. Altier 

 Altier Law Offices 

 1527 E. Fifth St. 

 Tyler, Texas 75701 

 Tel: 903-595-4232 

 Fax: 903-595-0031 

 e-mail: altierlaw@gmail.com

 State Bar of Texas No.: 00783541 

 

 Attorney for Appellant, Melissa Browning Hernandez 

ACCEPTED

12-15-00112-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/13/2015 12:00:00 AM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/12/2015 9:42:53 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
IDENTITIES OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL

State of Texas, Appellee

Plaintiff in Trial Court

 

Ms. Melissa Browning Hernandez, Appellant

Defendant in Trial Court

TRIAL COURT COUNSEL

Ms. Jenny Palmer, Attorney for State

125 N. Prairieville St.

Athens, Texas 75751

Mr. Daniel Cox, Attorney for State

125 N. Prairieville St.

Athens, Texas 75751

Ms. Linda A. Altier, Attorney for Defendant

1527 E. Fifth St.

Tyler, Texas 75701

APPELLATE COUNSEL

Ms. Linda Altier, Attorney for Appellant

1527 E. Fifth St.

Tyler, Texas 75701

Mr. R. Scott McKee, Attorney for State 

125 N. Prairieville St.

Athens, Texas 75751

i
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Identity of Parties and Counsel ............................................................i

Index of Authorities ........................................................................iii

Statement of the Case .......................................................................2

Statement of Jurisdiction....................................................................3

Issues Presented ..............................................................................3

POINT OF ERROR:

THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE TRIAL 

COURT’S ASSESSMENT OF ATTORNEY’S FEES AGAINST APPELLANT.

Statement of Facts ...........................................................................3

Point of Error Restated... . . ...............................................................4

Summary of the Argument..................................................................4

Argument and Authority ...................................................................4

Certificate of Service........................................................................7

Certificate of Compliance..................................................................7

ii
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

CASES: Page

Barker v. State, No. 12-13-00032-CR, Memorandum Opinion 

(Tex. App.-Tyler 2015) unpublished . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................. 6

Johnson v. State, 405 S.W.3d 350 (Tex.App.-Tyler 2013)............................. 5

Wolfe v. State, 377 S.W.3d 141 (Tex.App.-Amarillo, 2012, no pet)........... . 5,6

STATUTES AND RULES:

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 26.05 (g). ............................... 5,6

iii
 CASE NO. 12-15-00112-CR

 IN THE

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

 TYLER, TEXAS

_______________________________

 MELISSA BROWNING HERNANDEZ, Appellant

 vs.

 THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_______________________________

On Appeal from the

 392nd Judicial District Court

 Henderson County, Texas

 

 (Trial Court Case Number: C-21,601)

Honorable Judge Carter W. Tarrance, Judge Presiding

BRIEF OF APPELLANT

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW MELISSA BROWNING HERNANDEZ, hereinafter

sometimes referred to as Appellant, and submits this her Brief on Appeal in the

above entitled and numbered Cause, pursuant to the provisions of the Texas Rules

of Appellate Procedure.

1
APPELLANT WAIVES ORAL ARGUMENT

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

On October 2, 2014, a grand jury indicted Melissa Browning Hernandez, 

hereinafter sometimes referred to as Appellant, for Theft Over $20,000/Elderly, a 

Third Degree Felony, (CR1:1-3). Ms. Linda A. Altier was appointed by the Court

to represent Appellant as an indigent Defendant. On February 2, 2015 Appellant 

waived her right to a trial by jury (CR 1:21). On March 17, 2015 a pre-sentence 

investigation report was completed (CR 1:23-28). On April 16, 2015 Appellant 

entered her guilty plea (CR 1:29-30) and the Court heard the testimony and 

evidence at a sentencing hearing. The Court found Appellant guilty and sentenced 

her to Six (6) years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections 

Institutional Division, (CR 1:36-37). In the Judgement of Conviction, although 

Defendant was indigent, the Court ordered her pay her Defense Attorney’s fees 

(CR1:36). On April 27, 2015, Ms. Linda A. Altier was appointed to represent 

indigent Defendant on appeal (CR 1:34). Appellant filed her Notice of Appeal on 

April 27, 2015 (CR 1:35). 

Note: For purposes of this Appeal Brief, all references to the Clerk’s Record 

will be noted as “CR,” followed by the volume number and page number. 

References to the Reporter’s Record will be noted as “RR,” followed by the 

volume number, page number and line as necessary. Any emphasis added by this 

writer will be noted as same immediately following the word or phrase emphasized 

by italics. 

2
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

For the reasons above stated the Twelfth Court of Appeals holds jurisdiction. 

ISSUES PRESENTED

POINT OF ERROR:

THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE TRIAL 

COURT’S ASSESSMENT OF ATTORNEY’S FEES AGAINST APPELLANT.

 STATEMENT OF FACTS

When initially arrested, Appellant applied for a Court Appointed Attorney to 

defend her in her felony charges of Theft Over $20,000 from the Elderly, a Third 

Degree Felony. Her application was approved by the trial Court and Linda A. 

Altier was appointed to represent her. On February 2, 2015, Appellant signed an

agreement to plead guilty to the Court which also stated that Appellant was 

represented by a Court appointed attorney (CR 1:21). Following testimony at the 

sentencing trial on April 16, 2015, the Court adjudicated Appellant guilty and 

sentenced her to six (6) years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections 

Institutional Division (CR 1:36-37)). In the Judgment, the trial Court also 

assessed attorney fees to be paid by Appellant. On April 27, 2015, the trial Court

found that Appellant’s indigent status did not change for purposes of her appeal 

and appointed Ms. Linda A. Altier for the appeal. (CR 1:35)

3 
POINT OF ERROR (Restated):

THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE TRIAL 

COURT’S ASSESSMENT OF ATTORNEY’S FEES AGAINST APPELLANT.

SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT

Following the initial determination by the trial Court of Appellant’s status as 

indigent, the trial Court had sufficient evidence of Appellant’s inability to repay 

Court appointed Attorney’s fees, and there was no significant material change in 

her financial condition following trial. Accordingly, the trial Court erred in 

assessing Appellant the cost of Attorney’s fees in the Judgment of Conviction. 

 ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITY

The trial Court established, initially in this case, that Appellant was

indigent and without resources to retain legal counsel. Accordingly, an attorney

was appointed to represent her. Following her plea of guilty to the trial Court and 

the presentation of evidence, the trial Court affirmed Appellant’s guilt and assessed 

punishment at Six (6) years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal 

Justice, Institutional Division. No testimony or evidence was elicited regarding 

repayment of the Attorney’s fees (RR 1:1-66). However, the trial Court did sign a 

Judgment that included repayment of attorney’s fees in the amount of $750.00 (CR 

1:36). A trial Court has authority to assess court appointed defense attorney’s fees 

4
against a Defendant when the trial Court determines Defendant has the resources to 

pay part or all of the fees Tex.C.C.P. art. 26.05 (g). Nevertheless, in this 

particular case, the trial Court did not hear any testimony or evidence from 

Appellant that would reflect she had financial resources to pay the attorney fees or 

that she had a change in her financial or material circumstances since the trial 

Court established her indigent status. Additionally, the trial Court was aware of 

Appellant’s indigent status at the beginning of her legal process since the trial 

Court approved Appellant’s request for a Court appointed attorney. Further, the 

trial Court acknowledged Appellant’s uninterrupted indigent status approving her

request for a Court appointed appellant attorney to process her appeal (CR 1: 31). 

In Johnson v. State, 405 S.W.3d 350 (Tex.App.-Tyler 2013) the Court, 

considering Tex.C.C.P. art 26.05, held that once a criminal defendant is determined 

to be indigent, he is presumed to continue to be indigent for the remainder of the 

proceedings unless a material change occurs in his financial circumstances. In 

Wolfe v. State, 377 S.W.3d 141 (Tex.App-Amarillo 2012, no pet) the Amarillo 

Court held that a trial Court must determine by some supported factual basis in the 

record if a defendant has financial resources to offset in part or in whole the costs 

of the Court appointed attorney fees before the trial Court can impose the attorney 

fees on the defendant. Appellant argues that, as in Johnson v. State and following 

5
art 26.05 the trial Court determined she was indigent and she remained indigent 

during the entire criminal proceedings; and as in Wolfe v. State, there was no 

factual basis in the record of a material change in her financial resources to impose 

repayment of attorney fees by Appellant. In Barker v. State, No. 12-13-00032-CR,

Memorandum Opinion (Tex. App.-Tyler 2015) unpublished, an appeal from the 

173rd District Court, Henderson County, Texas, the Appellant argued, as does 

Appellant Melissa Browning Hernandez, that the evidence was legally insufficient 

to support the trial Court’s assessment of attorney’s fees in the absence of evidence 

on the record to support a finding that Barker was not indigent. The Court of 

Appeals, in Barker, held there was no basis in the record to support the imposition 

of attorney’s fees and sustained Barker’s issue concerning attorney fees. 

For all the above reasons, this case should be reversed and remanded to the 

trial Court for rehearing based on insufficient evidence to support the trial Court’s 

decision to access attorney’s fees against Appellant.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully prays 

that this Honorable Court hold that there is insufficient evidence to support the trial 

Court’s assessment of attorney’s fees against Appellant and remand this case for 

rehearing. 

 6
Respectfully Submitted,

ALTIER LAW OFFICES

1527 E. Fifth St.

Tyler, Texas 75701

Tel: 903-595-4232

Fax: 903-595-0031

altierlaw@gmail.com

By: /s/ Linda A. Altier

TSBN: 00783541

Attorney for Appellant

Melissa Browning Hernandez

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Appellant’s Brief will be served on the Attorney for the State, R. Scott 

McKee, Henderson County District Attorney, 109 W. Corsicana St., Ste. 103, 

Athens, Texas, by hand delivery, on July 13, 2015.

/s/ Linda A. Altier 

 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

In compliance with TRAP 9.4(i), the undersigned hereby certifies that 

the number of words contained in the above Brief of Appellant are 659; excluding

caption, identity of parties and counsel, statement regarding oral argument, table of 

contents, index of authorities, statement of the case, statement of issues presented, 

statement of jurisdiction, signature, proof of service, certification, and certificate of 

compliance.

/s/ Linda A. Altier

7