alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24                    
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     We,  the  undersigned   Directors  and  Officers  of  The  Black  &  Decker
Corporation  (the  "Corporation"),   hereby  constitute  and  appoint  Nolan  D.
Archibald, Thomas M. Schoewe and Charles E. Fenton, and each of them, with power
of substitution,  our true and lawful  attorneys-in-fact with full power to sign
for us, in our names and in the capacities  indicated below,  the  Corporation's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, and any and all
amendments thereto.



/s/  NOLAN D. ARCHIBALD      Director, Chairman,               February 12, 1998
-------------------------    President and Chief 
Nolan D. Archibald           Executive Officer   
                             (Principal Executive
                             Officer)            
                             

/s/  NORMAN R. AUGUSTINE     Director                          February 12, 1998
-------------------------
Norman R. Augustine


/s/  BARBARA L. BOWLES       Director                          February 12, 1998
-------------------------
Barbara L. Bowles


/s/  MALCOLM CANDLISH        Director                          February 12, 1998
-------------------------
Malcolm Candlish


/s/  ALONZO G. DECKER, JR.   Director                          February 12, 1998
--------------------------
Alonzo G. Decker, Jr.


/s/  ANTHONY LUISO           Director                          February 12, 1998
--------------------------
Anthony Luiso


/s/  MARK H. WILLES          Director                          February 12, 1998
--------------------------
Mark H. Willes


/s/  M. CABELL WOODWARD, JR. Director                          February 12, 1998
----------------------------
M. Cabell Woodward, Jr.


/s/  THOMAS M. SCHOEWE       Senior Vice President             February 12, 1998
--------------------------   and Chief Financial
Thomas M. Schoewe            Officer (Principal     
                             Financial Officer)     
                                                



<PAGE>


/s/  STEPHEN F. REEVES       Vice President and                February 12, 1998
--------------------------   Corporate Controller 
Stephen F. Reeves            (Principal Accounting  
                             Officer)               
                                                



                                      - 2 -
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kirby A. Tyndall, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bank of Granite
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors:  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 8, 2004
    
    /s/ Kirby A. TyndallKirby A. TyndallSecretary, Treasurer andChief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Sharon K. Bland, Appellant, v Gellman, Brydges & Schroff et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent. (And Another Proceeding.)

Submitted April 1, 2013;

decided September 12, 2013

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*20 NY3d 1055 (2013)].

Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

*Time and Date:*                         1 p.m.-4 p.m., July 16, 2009 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of “Translating Research to Protect Health through Health Promotion, Prevention, and Preparedness, Panel C, FOA CD09-001, initial review.”                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Susan B. Stanton, D.D.S., Scientific Review Administrator, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone (404) 639-4640.                    

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: June 18, 2009.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-15092 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
quarterly report of VelaTel Global Communications, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2013, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (“this Report”),
I, George Alvarez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i) this Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained
in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 19, 2013 | By: /s/ George Alvarez                 
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                       | George Alvarez, Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of a Change in Status of an Extended Benefit (EB) Period 
for Ohio

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility 
under the EB program for Ohio.
    The following change has occurred since the publication of the last 
notice regarding the State's EB status:
    <bullet> Ohio has modified its law by adding a total unemployment 
rate (TUR) trigger retroactive to February 22, 2009. As a result, Ohio 
has retroactively triggered ``on'' to a high unemployment period (HUP) 
for weeks of unemployment beginning March 15, 2009, and eligible 
unemployed workers will be able to collect up to an additional 20 weeks 
of unemployment insurance benefits.

Information for Claimants

    The duration of benefits payable in the EB Program, and the terms 
and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-
State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and 
the operating instructions issued to the states by the U.S. Department 
of Labor. In the case of a state beginning an HUP, the State Workforce 
Agency will furnish a written notice of potential entitlement to each 
individual who may be eligible for increased benefits due to the HUP 
(20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)). Persons who wish to inquire about their rights 
under the program should contact their State Workforce Agency.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of 
Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Workforce 
Security, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances Perkins Building, Room 
S-4231, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3008 (this is 
not a toll-free number) or by e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87e0eee5e5e8e9f4a9f4e4e8f3f3c7e3e8eba9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="07606e65656869742974646873734763686b29606871">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of June 2009.
Douglas F. Small,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-15165 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of Thomas Porter, Appellant, v Robert Dennison, as Chair of the New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 679]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered March 15, 2006 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner was convicted in 1982 of the crimes of murder in the second degree and manslaughter in the first degree and was sentenced, respectively, to concurrent terms of 15 years to life and SVs to 25 years in prison. In January 2005, he made his seventh appearance before the Board of Parole for parole release. Following a hearing, his request was denied and he was ordered held for an additional 24 months. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging it. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

We affirm. Initially, we note that the Board is required to consider the statutory factors set forth in Executive Law § 259-i in making decisions regarding parole release *(see Matter of Prout v Dennison,*26 AD3d 540, 541 [2006]). It is not, however, required to discuss each factor or to accord each factor equal weight *(see Matter of Coombs v New York State Div. of Parole,*25 AD3d 1051, 1051 [2006]). Notably, parole release decisions are discretionary and will not be disturbed unless petitioner demonstrates “ ‘irrationality bordering on impropriety’ ” *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000], quoting *Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]; *see Matter of Tatta v Dennison,*26 AD3d 663, 663 [2006], *lv denied*6 NY3d 714 [2006]). Here, the record discloses that the Board considered not only the serious nature of petitioner’s crimes, but also the lack of improvement in his prison disciplinary record, his many program accomplishments and his postrelease plans in denying his request for parole release. Inasmuch as the Board took into account the proper statutory factors, we cannot conclude that its decision is irrational and, therefore, we decline to disturb it.

Cardona, PJ., Mercure, Spain, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Summary of Annual Base Salaries Approved for Named Executive Officers of WOR



 Exhibit 10.58 
  

ANNUAL BASE SALARIES APPROVED FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 

OF 
 WORTHINGTON
INDUSTRIES, INC. 
 Effective June 28, 2013, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of
Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. (the “Registrant”) approved the base salaries for the named executive officers identified below, which base salaries will become effective September 2013. 

 

					
	 Name and Principal Position
	  	Base Salary	 
	 John P. McConnell

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant
	  	$	625,000	  
	 Mark A. Russell

President and Chief Operating Officer of the Registrant
	  	$	515,000	  
	 B. Andrew Rose

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant
	  	$	464,000	  
	 Virgil L. Winland

Executive Vice President – Manufacturing of the Registrant
	  	$	334,000	  
	 Andrew J. Billman

President, Worthington Cylinder Corporation
	  	$	390,000	  

 George P. Stoe, the other named executive officer of the Registrant for purposes of the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013, retired as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Registrant effective August 1, 2012, but remained employed as non-executive chairman of the Engineered Cabs business unit.
He retired from that position effective May 31, 2013, but remains employed by the Registrant as an advisor. He will receive a $5,000 per month base salary during the fiscal year ending May 31, 2014.
#### In the Matter of Trevor Frederick, Petitioner, v Ronald A. Zweibel et al., Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 474]

for an order pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. All concur. No opinion. Order filed. Concur— Andrias, J.E, Marlow, Nardelli, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2753

___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Edward L. Garlock, Jr.,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: February 9, 2015

 Filed: July 10, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Edward Garlock pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm as a

previously convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The statutory

maximum punishment for that offense ordinarily is ten years’ imprisonment, 18

U.S.C. § 924(a)(2), but the ArmedCareer Criminal Act providesfor an enhanced term

of fifteen years to life imprisonment for certain recidivists. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). The
enhancement applies to a person who has three previous convictions for serious drug

offenses committed on occasions different from one another. Id. § 924(e)(1),

(e)(2)(A). Based on Garlock’s criminal history, which included four convictions for

serious drug offenses committed on separate occasions, the district court determined 1

that Garlock was subject to the enhanced punishment and sentenced him to 200

months’ imprisonment.

Garlock appeals solely on the ground that the indictment did not allege the

predicate convictions that qualified him for the sentencing enhancement or that those

offenses were committed on occasions different from one another. He contends that

the district court violated the Sixth Amendment by enhancing his sentence based on

facts that were not charged in the indictment and found by a jury or admitted by the

defendant.

In general, “any facts that increase the prescribed range of penalties to which

a criminal defendant is exposed are elements of the crime” that must be charged in

an indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Alleyne v. United States, 133

S. Ct. 2151, 2160-61 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). But according to

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 243-44 (1998), recidivism is not

such an element, and the Court in Alleyne did not revisit that “narrow exception” to

the general rule. 133 S. Ct. at 2160 n.1. Accordingly, Garlock’s contention is

foreclosed by precedent. United States v. Evans, 738 F.3d 935, 936-37 (8th Cir.

2014) (per curiam); United States v. Abrahamson, 731 F.3d 751, 751-52 (8th Cir.

2013) (per curiam). In any event, Garlock admitted the pertinent facts regarding the

predicate convictions by not objecting to the recitation in the presentence report. 

United States v. Paz, 411 F.3d 906, 909 (8th Cir. 2005).

The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western

1

District of Missouri.

-2-
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

______________________________

-3-
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TERESA SHEEHAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation;

HEATHER FONG, in her capacity as

Chief of Police for the City and

County of San Francisco; KIMBERLY

REYNOLDS, individually, and in her

capacity as police officer for the City

and County of San Francisco;

KATHERINE HOLDER, individually,

and in her capacity as police officer

for the City and County of San

Francisco,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-16401

D.C. No.

3:09-cv-03889-

CRB

ORDER

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed July 14, 2015

Before: John T. Noonan, Susan P. Graber

and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.
2 SHEEHAN V. CITY & CNTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO

ORDER

In our previous opinion, Sheehan v. City &County of San

Francisco, 743 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir. 2014), we affirmed in part

and vacated in part the judgment of the district court. In City

& County of San Francisco v. Sheehan, 135 S. Ct. 1765

(2015), the Supreme Court reversed our judgment in part and

remanded to this court for further proceedings. Under these

decisions, the district court properly granted summary

judgment to the defendants on Sheehan’s Fourth Amendment

claims but, as explained in Parts III and IV of our previous

opinion, erred by granting summary judgment to the

defendants on Sheehan’s Americans with Disabilities Act and

state law claims. We therefore affirm in part and vacate in

part the judgment of the district court and remand to the

district court for further proceedings. Each party shall bear

its own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART AND

REMANDED.
AMKR 6.30.13 Ex 10.7






	
	
	The Bank shall explain the material contents of this Agreement to the Mortgagor and shall deliver to the Mortgagor a copy of the general terms and conditions for credit transactions and a copy of this Agreement.






	
				
	Prepared by
	Reviewed by
	Approved by

	



	 
	 
	 






KUN-MORTGAGE


AMENDMENT AGREEMENT TO KUN-MORTGAGE AGREEMENT
(For Changes of Kun-Mortgage Amount)


	
	
	* Please enter the appropriate information in your own handwriting in the spaces within the thick rectangles provided.
* This amendment agreement is not required to be registered and becomes effective upon a mutual agreement by and among parties.






                                                               April 19, 2013


	
			
	Creditor & Mortgagee:
	Woori Bank                              (seal)
	Seal Collation

	Address:
	 
	 

	Obligor:
	Amkor Technology Korea, Inc.             (seal)
Representative Director & CEO  Joo-Ho Kim

	Address:
	280-8, 2-ga, Seongsoo-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul
	Seal Collation

	Mortgagor:
	Amkor Technology Korea, Inc.             (seal)
Representative Director & CEO  Joo-Ho Kim
	 

	Address:
	280-8, 2-ga, Seongsoo-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul








The Kun Mortgage Amount covered by the kun-mortgage established by and among the above parties shall be changed as follows:




Kun Mortgage Amount


Kun Mortgage Amount after Change: 
USD Three Hundred Ninety (390) Million to USD Three Hundred Forty (340) Million











Specifications of Existing Kun-Mortgage


	
			
	1. Kun-Mortgage Agreement
	Kun-Mortgage Agreement dated April 4, 2007

	2. Details of Joint Mortgages
	Registration
	Registry Office of Gwangjoo District Court, April 5, 2007, No. 60992

	Properties
	957, Daechon-dong, Buk-gu, Gwangjoo

	Priority
	1st priority

	Owner
	Amkor Technology Korea, Inc.

	Registration
	Registry Office of Incheon District Court, April 5, 2007, No. 28081

	Properties
	419-1, Cheongcheon-dong, Boopyoung-gu, Incheon

	Priority
	1st priority

	Owner
	Amkor Technology Korea, Inc.

	Registration
	Registry Office of Seoul Eastern District Court, April 5, 2007, No. 24197

	Properties
	280, 2-ga, Seongsoo-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul and others

	Priority
	1st priority

	Owner
	Amkor Technology Korea, Inc.

	Registration
	Registry Office of Incheon District Court, April 5, 2007, No. 21924

	Properties
	516-1, Hyosung-dong, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon and others

	Priority
	1st priority

	Owner
	Amkor Technology Korea, Inc.








AMKOR TECHNOLOGY KOREA, INC.




______________________    
Title: Representative Director
Name: Joo-Ho Kim 




WOORI BANK




______________________
Title: Manager
Name: Shin-Heung Kim