alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                  Exhibit 12(a)

                                Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
               Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and
       Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends



                                                              1996      1997      1998      1999      2000
<S>                                                          <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>      <C>
Fixed charges, as defined:
  Total Interest Charges                                     $106,716  $104,165   $96,685   $97,023  $101,600
  Interest applicable to rentals                               19,121    17,529    15,511    17,289    16,449
                                                             ------------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges, as defined                               125,837   121,694   112,196   114,312   118,049

Preferred dividends, as defined (a)                            24,731    16,073    16,763    17,836    13,479
                                                             ------------------------------------------------

Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined   $150,568  $137,767  $128,959  $132,148  $131,528
                                                             ================================================
Earnings as defined:

  Net Income                                                 $157,798  $127,977  $110,951   $69,313  $137,047
  Add:
    Provision for income taxes:
       Total                                                   84,445    59,220    71,374    54,012   100,512
    Fixed charges as above                                    125,837   121,694   112,196   114,312   118,049
                                                             ------------------------------------------------
Total earnings, as defined                                   $368,080  $308,891  $294,521  $237,637  $355,608
                                                             ================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined                   2.93      2.54      2.63      2.08      3.01
                                                             ================================================

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
 preferred dividends, as defined                                 2.44      2.24      2.28      1.80      2.70
                                                             ================================================


------------------------
(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are
    computed by dividing the preferred dividend requirement by one
    hundred percent (100%) minus the income tax rate.


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 15 (Monday, January 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,536]


Industrial Paint and Strip, Inc., Woodsfield, OH; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on November 25, 2008 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Industrial 
Paint and Strip, Inc., Woodsfield, Ohio.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of January 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-1496 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**MAURICE JACKSON,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 201 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 13th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
#### Yuan Zhai, Appellant, v Chemical Bank et al., Respondents.

Decided August 29, 2013

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that it does not lie *(see*CPLR 5601).

Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED   BALANCE   SHEET,   CONSOLIDATED   STATEMENT  OF  OPERATIONS   AND
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS  INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR
THE YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 2, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                          OCT-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                            OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                                  1752
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             1428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        4075
<PP&E>                                                  11524
<DEPRECIATION>                                          7520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          10772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   2693
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                420
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                              6560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            10772
<SALES>                                                 20685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        22315
<CGS>                                                   10194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           20772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         1775
<INCOME-TAX>                                            (593)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     2368
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                            2368
<EPS-BASIC>                                             1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           1.15


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:



(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;



(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.



|       |                                                                   
|------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation                         
|       | General Partner                                                   
|       |                                                                   
|By:    | /S/ Kelly Tucek                                                   
|       |                                                                   
|Name:  | Kelly Tucek                                                       
|Title: | Vice President of the General Partner and                         
|       | principal financial officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.
|Date:  | May 11, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14790]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1287-000]


Lumberton Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

June 17, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Lumberton Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 16, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e9afacbbaaa6878580878cba9c9999869b9da98f8c9b8ac78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88cecddacbc7e6e4e1e6eddbfdf8f8e7fafcc8eeedfaeba6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>. 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-14790 Filed 6-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  By:
    /s/ Joshua G. JamesDate: May 7, 2009
    
    Name:
    Joshua G. JamesTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  By:
    /s/ Michael S. HerringDate: May 7, 2009
    
    Name:
    Michael S. HerringTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) A signed original of each of the written statements above required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Omniture, Inc. and will be retained by Omniture,
Inc. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 The forgoing certifications are being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, and
they shall not be considered filed as part of such report
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 22, 2010 

s1115 

Order 

 

November 22, 2010 

141572 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141572 

 COA: 290131 

Saginaw CC: 08-030280-FC 

DEONTAE TRAVOHN DAVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration of an issue raised by the defendant but not addressed in that court’s 

opinion: whether the circuit court erroneously allowed the statement of the defendant’s 

co-defendant, Caprice Mack, to be introduced into evidence through the preliminary 

examination testimony of Travis Crowley. In all other respects, leave to appeal is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be 

reviewed by this Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**ERIC STEWART,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**RAYMOND BANACH, LAWRENCE**

**FLANSBURG AND WESTFALL TOWNSHIP,** 

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 525 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 2nd day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal**

**is** DENIED

**.**
Ju ly 2 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
STEVEN PAUL WORKS , Appellant NO. 14

- 12

- 00917

- CR V. NO. 14

- 12

- 00918

- CR THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of LifeCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chris A.
Walker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 220, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 14, 2008



/s/ CHRIS A. WALKERChris A. WalkerChief Financial Officer




38
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-05-00435- CR

Ce c il M at th e w Sala z ar , I II, App e lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY , 51ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. A-04- 1016 -S, H ONO RAB LE BARB ARA L. WALTH ER, JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Appellant Cec il Matthew Salazar, I I I , pleade d g uilty befor e a jury to the offe nse of attempted ca

pital murder. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 15.01 (West 2003) , § 1 9
. 0 3 (W es t Supp. 2005). Afte r hea

ringevidenc e re levant to sentenc e, t h e j ury assessed punishment at life imp ri so nme nt. Ap pe lla

nt’ s c ourt -a

pp ointe d atto rn e y

fi le d a br ie f c on c lud ing

that th e a

pp e a l is frivolous and without mer it. The brief me ets the re quirements of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by p re s en t i n ga prof essional eva luation of the re cord de monstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be adva nced. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 7 5 ( 19 88 ); Hi gh v . S tate , 573 S.W. 2d 80 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S.W .2d 68 4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); J ac k so n v . S tate , 4 85 S.W. 2d

55 3 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Ga ino us v . S tate , 4 3 6 S. W. 2 d

1 3 7 ( T e x. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant a lso filed a pro se brief a fter e x amining the appellate rec ord.2 We have r eviewe d the record, c ounsel’s brief , and the pr o se brief

. We find nothing in the rec ord that mig ht arguably support the appe al. Se e Ble ds oev . S tate , 178 S.W .3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Counsel’s motion t o withdraw is g rante d.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

_____________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _______________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Patter son and Pemberton Affir med Filed: May

26, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh
JACKIE KING,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3225

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 14, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Liberty County.

Jonathan E. Sjostrom, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Mark Graham Hanson, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges, in an appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), her judgment and sentence. We affirm appellant’s judgment and 

sentence; however, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error in 

the judgment to reflect that appellant was convicted after a jury trial as opposed to 
2

a plea of nolo contendre. See Clark v. State, 85 So. 3d 1190, 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 

2012) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener’s error in 

judgment). 

Additionally, because the record reveals potential errors in the imposition of 

costs and fees, including a possible discrepancy between the amount orally noted 

by the trial court and the amount actually imposed, we affirm without prejudice to 

appellant’s ability to file an appropriate post-conviction motion challenging the 

assessment of costs and fees, if she wishes to do so. See Ramos v. State, 156 So. 

3d 591, 591-92 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

WOLF, WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gaye Adams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Online  Originals,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

    a)    designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during  the  period in which  this  quarterly
          report is being prepared;

    b)    evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)    presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
          the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

    a)    all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

    b)    any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes
in  internal  controls  or in other  factors  that  could  significantly  affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.


Date:    July 11, 2008

By:       /s/ Gaye Adams
         -------------------
         Gaye Adams
         President and CEO
#### Madison Realty Capital, L.P., Respondent, v Broken Angel, LLC, et al., Defendants, and Arthur N. Wood, Appellant. Arthur N. Wood, Appellant, v Madison Realty Capital, L.P., Respondent.

Submitted June 24, 2013;

decided September 17, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the actions within the meaning of the Constitution.