alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Concho Resources Inc. (the
Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)), or for causing such controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for
the Registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: November 13, 2008
    
    /s/ Timothy A. Leach

Timothy A. LeachDirector, Chairman of the Board of Directors and 

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 114TH DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 20th

day of May, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JAWORSKI LYNN ADKINS, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00130-CR; Trial Court No. 114-1676-13

Opinion by Greg Neeley, Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the 

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the 

court below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court below for 

observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 15th day of July, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
1

 Former Rule 11(e)(1)(C) is now Rule 11(c)(1)(C). See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11

advisory committee note. 

2

 The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2512

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Southern District of Iowa.

Sidney L. Shelton, also known as *

Andre Henderson, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: March 9, 2009

Filed: May 1, 2009

___________

Before MURPHY, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In 1998, Sidney L. Shelton pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to

distribute cocaine base. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(e)(1)(C)

(1998),1

 Shelton agreed to a 300-month sentence. The district court2 accepted

Shelton’s plea agreement and sentenced him to 300 months’ imprisonment. 
-2-

In 2008, after the U.S. Sentencing Commission approved the crack cocaine

amendments to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Shelton moved for a reduction of his

sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court denied Shelton’s

motion because it found that Shelton’s Rule 11(e)(1)(C) plea agreement made him

ineligible for such a reduction. 

 

Shelton appeals the district court’s ruling and argues that, as a matter of law,

his Rule 11(e)(1)(C) plea agreement does not make him ineligible for a § 3582(c)(2)

sentence reduction pursuant to the crack cocaine amendments. Our decision in United

States v. Scurlark, 560 F.3d 839 (8th Cir 2009), forecloses Shelton’s argument. In

Scurlark, we rejected a materially indistinguishable argument and held that courts may

not, based on subsequent Guidelines amendments, reduce sentences under §

3582(c)(2) for defendants who have pleaded guilty pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea

agreements. Id. at 841–43. For the reasons set forth in Scurlark, we therefore affirm

the district court. 

______________________________
# Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease

## What is Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease?

Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease (PMD) is a rare, progressive, and degenerative central nervous system disorder that deteriorates coordination, motor abilities, and cognitive function. The disease is one of a group of disorders known as the leukodystrophies, which affect growth of the myelin sheath—the fatty covering that wraps around and protects nerve fibers in the brain. 

PMD is caused by a mutation in the gene that controls the production of a myelin protein called proteolipid protein-1 (PLP1). Severity and onset of the disease ranges widely depending on the type of PLP1 mutation. PMD is one in a spectrum of diseases associated with PLP1, which also includes spastic paraplegia type 2 (SPG2). Symptoms of PLP1-related disorders range from severe central nervous system involvement to progressive weakness and stiffness of the legs.

There is no cure for PMD, nor is there a standard course of treatment. Treatment is symptomatic and supportive and may include medication for movement disorders. The prognosis for those with the severe forms of PMD is poor due to the progressive deterioration. Individuals with the mild form may have an average life span.

file-medical

## How can I or my loved one help improve care for people with Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease?

PMD is considered rare, which often means there is not much information known about it. This is usually the case because doctors and researchers do not see many people with the disorder, which makes it hard to learn from them through observations or large studies. 

Consider participating in a clinical trial so clinicians and scientists can learn more about PMD and related disorders. Clinical research uses human volunteers to help researchers learn more about a disorder and perhaps find better ways to safely detect, treat, or prevent disease. 

All types of volunteers are needed—those who are healthy or may have an illness or disease—of all different ages, sexes, races, and ethnicities to ensure that study results apply to as many people as possible, and that treatments will be safe and effective for everyone who will use them. 

For information about participating in clinical research visit NIH Clinical Research Trials and You. Learn about clinical trials currently looking for people with PMD at Clinicaltrials.gov.
> Where can I find more information about Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease?
The following organizations and resources help individuals, families, friends, and caregivers of people living with PMD:

Genetic and Rare Diseases (GARD) Information Center

Hunter's Hope FoundationPhone: 716-667-1200 or 877-984-4673

MedlinePlus

National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD)Phone: 203-744-0100 or 800-999-6673

Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease FoundationPhone: 254-313-9107

PubMed

United Leukodystrophy FoundationPhone: 815-748-3211 or 800-728-5483

## Learn about related topics

              - Leukodystrophy

book-open
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00159-CV

Ronald MENSCH,

Appellant

v.

STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CI02326

Honorable Stephani Walsh, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee State Farm Fire & Casualty Company recover its costs of 

this appeal from appellant Ronald Mensch.

SIGNED July 15, 2015.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7661
NICHOLAS WARNER JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97- 775-L, CA-97-898-L) Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nicholas Warner Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Corcoran , Nos. CA-97-775-L; CA-97-898-L (D. Md. Nov. 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Publicaciones acerca prevención

¿Necesito ayuda para mi salud mental?

Esta hoja informativa presenta información sobre cómo evaluar su salud mental y determinar si necesita ayuda. Da ejemplos de síntomas leves y graves, así como actividades de autocuidado personal y opciones de ayuda profesional.

In English

Consejos sobre cómo hablar con su proveedor de atención médica sobre su salud mental

Esta hoja informativa brinda cinco consejos para ayudarlo a prepararse y guiarlo sobre cómo hablar con su médico u otro proveedor de atención médica sobre su salud mental y así aprovechar al máximo su visita.

In English
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 24, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 30209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15103]



[[Page 30207]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of June 22, 2009--Continuation of the National Emergency With 
Respect to the Western Balkans


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 24, 2009 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 30209]]

                Notice of June 22, 2009

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to the Western Balkans

                On June 26, 2001, by Executive Order 13219, the 
                President declared a national emergency with respect to 
                the Western Balkans, pursuant to the International 
                Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706), to 
                deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the 
                national security and foreign policy of the United 
                States constituted by the actions of persons engaged 
                in, or assisting, sponsoring, or supporting (i) 
                extremist violence in the Republic of Macedonia and 
                elsewhere in the Western Balkans region, or (ii) acts 
                obstructing implementation of the Dayton Accords in 
                Bosnia or United Nations Security Council Resolution 
                1244 of June 10, 1999, in Kosovo. The President 
                subsequently amended that order in Executive Order 
                13304 of May 28, 2003.

                Because the actions of persons threatening the peace 
                and international stabilization efforts in the Western 
                Balkans continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary 
                threat to the national security and foreign policy of 
                the United States, the national emergency declared on 
                June 26, 2001, and the measures adopted on that date 
                and thereafter to deal with that emergency, must 
                continue in effect beyond June 26, 2009. Therefore, in 
                accordance with section 202(d) of the National 
                Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing 
                for 1 year the national emergency with respect to the 
                Western Balkans.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register  
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    June 22, 2009.

[FR Doc. E9-15103
Filed 6-23-09; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3195-W9-P
#### KLUG v. PALMER et al.

Civil No. 2400.

District Court, E. D. New York.

Jan. 21, 1942.

Edward R. Brumley, of New York City, for defendants, for the motion.

O’Neill, Higgins & Latto, of New York City, for plaintiff, opposed.

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion for a bill of particulars under Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

Under the Rules of Civil Procedure, motions for bills of particulars are not favored, unless it appears that the information demanded is necessary to enable the moving party to answer, or reply to, the pleading of the other party in that case.

Examination before trial, interrogatories and discovery, are the methods provided for obtaining general information that may be necessary to enable the party to properly prepare for trial.

Form 14 in the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure indicates quite clearly what should be allowed.

Demand 1, is allowed.

Demand 3, is allowed.

Demand 5, is allowed.

While the particularizations which were required by bills of particulars under the former practice have been done away with, it is still requisite, in order for the defendants in this case to answer, to know generally what were the acts of negligence on which plaintiff bases his claim.

From a reading of the complaint it would seem that in addition to a general charge of negligence, plaintiff has alleged other things, which would be properly included in the charge of negligence.

The complaint does not charge negligence and say in that relating to some particular form, but alleges negligence baldly, and then, further acts or omissions, as negligence.

The mere statement that the plaintiff was injured because the engine was derailed, does not charge any particular form of negligence, which is clearly contemplated by Form 14, hereinbefore referred to.

*274As I believe that a .proper answer to Demand 5 would necessarily include Demands 6 and 7, I will confine the requirement to that demand.

Demands 2, 4, 6 and 7 are denied. Demands 1, 3 and 5 are granted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Special Emphasis Panel. RC2 Medical Sequencing.                    

*Date:*                         July 15-16, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda North Marriott and Conference Center, 5701 Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rudy O. Pozzatti, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 9306, Rockville, MD 20852. (301) 402-0838.                         *pozzattr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 17, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-14698 Filed 6-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Order entered July 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01294-CV

TOM KARTSOTIS, Appellant

V.

RICHARD L. BLOCH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A TRUSTEE OF 

THE RICHARD AND NANCY BLOCH FAMILY TRUST, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-04489

ORDER

Before the Court is the July 8, 2015 motion of Vielica Dobbins, Official Court Reporter 

for the 134th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We 

GRANT the motion as follows. We STRIKE the reporter’s records filed on March 30, 2015, 

June 29, 2015, and July 6, 2015. We ORDER Ms. Dobbins to file, by JULY 24, 2015, a tenvolume reporter’s record as set forth in her motion.

Appellant has filed his brief in this case. On the Court’s own motion, appellant may file, 

WITHIN TWENTY DAYS OF THE DATE THE REPORTER’S RECORD IS FILED, an 

amended brief correcting any citations to the reporter’s record.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 560 

Inquiring whether the House of Representatives should impeach Brett M. 

Kavanaugh, an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United 

States of America. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2019 

Ms. PRESSLEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Inquiring whether the House of Representatives should impeach Brett M. Kavanaugh, an Associate Justice of the 

Supreme Court of the United States of America. 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the Committee on the Judiciary shall in3 quire whether the House of Representatives should 

4 impeach Brett M. Kavanaugh, an Associate Justice 

5 of the Supreme Court of the United States of Amer6 ica; 

7 (2) the Committee on the Judiciary or any sub8 committee or task force designated by the Com9 mittee may, in connection with the inquiry under 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 560 IH 

1 this resolution, take affidavits and depositions by a 

2 member, counsel, or consultant of the Committee, 

3 pursuant to notice or subpoena; and 

4 (3) there shall be paid out of the applicable ac5 counts of the House of Representatives such sums 

6 as may be necessary to assist the Committee on the 

7 Judiciary in conducting the inquiry under this reso8 lution, any of which may be used for the procure9 ment of staff or consultant services. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS