alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6642

WALTER DELANEY BOOKER, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

M. E. ENGELKE, Director of Food Services; N. GREGG, State Dietitian; H. 

PONTON, Regional Administrator, Western; L. FLEMING, Warden; M. 

BROYLES, FOMB; Q. REYNOLDS, Unit Manager; J. COMBS, Assistant Warden; 

BRYANT, Sergeant; CHOW HALL OFFICERS, C and D side; WITT, Correctional 

Officer; MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator, Western; SGT. KIMBERLIN; 

E. PEARSON, Warden-Greensville; A. ANDERSON, GCC Food Operations 

Director; CREQUE, GCC Food Services Manager; S. TAPP, GCC Ombudsman; K. 

PHILLIPS, GCC Ombudsman,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:16-cv-00084-JLK-RSB)

Submitted: September 29, 2020 Decided: December 3, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Delaney Booker, Jr. Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Walter Delaney Booker, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ 

motions for summary judgment in Booker’s action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 

the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc to 2000cc5. After reviewing the record, we are satisified that, even assuming the Defendants’ 

policies substantially burdened Booker’s free exercise rights under the Religious Land Use 

and Institutionalized Persons Act and the First Amendment, the policies were reasonably 

related to the prison’s legitimate penological interests in balancing inmates’ religious 

dietary restrictions with the agency’s operational, budgetary, and administrative concerns, 

and so affirm on that basis. On all other claims, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Booker v. Engelke, No. 7:16-cv-00084-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va., Mar. 22, 2018 

& Mar. 26, 2019). We further deny Booker’s motion for injunctive relief pending appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment to
Registration Statement No. 33-13901, and in Registration Statement Nos.
33-73696, 33-73698, 33-73700, 333-17349, 333-17351, 333-50356, 333-75388,
333-75390, 333-102070, and 333-102072 of Barr Laboratories, Inc. on Form S-8 of
our report dated August 6, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
of Barr Laboratories, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2003.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
August 29, 2003
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136507 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136507 

 COA: 283732 

Genesee CC: 02-010963-FC 

BARRY JOHN STIFF,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 I 0 0 61

. BRUCE G. BORN et a l . v . L. SCOTT BORN et a l

.

In t h i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal
, t h e ap p l i can t s s eek rev i ew o f a t ri al

co u rt o rd er t h at i s t h e s u b j ect o f d i rect ap p eal i n Cas e N o. A2 2 A0 4 1 7
, L. S co t t Bo r n

et a l

. v. Br u ce G. Bo r n et a l. As p art o f t h ei r res p o n s e t o t h at ap p eal
, t h e ap p l i can t s wi l l b e ab l e t o rai s e t h ei r ch al l en g es t o t h e tri al co u rt ’ s s u m m ary j u d gm en t o rd er. See
Ga

. So c’y o

f Pl a s t i c S u r g eo ns v. An d

er s o n , 2 5 7 G a. 71 0
, 71 1 (3 6 3 SE2 d 1 4 0 ) (1 9 8 7 ) (“ [A] ru l i n g t h at b eco m es m at eri al t o an en u m erat i o n o f erro r u rg ed b y an ap p el l an t

m ay b e co n s i d ered by th e ap pel l at e co u rt wi t h o u t th e n eces s i t y o f a cro s s -ap p eal .”).
Acco rd in g ly , t h e i n s t an t ap p l i cat i o n i s h ereb y DENIED as s up erfl u o us

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. November 09, 2021

11/09/2021
Filed 12/14/05 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2005 ND 207

In the Matter of the Reciprocal Discipline of Richard E. Edinger,

a member of the Bar of the State of North Dakota

No. 20050429

Recommendation for Reciprocal Discipline.

SUSPENSION ORDERED.

Per Curiam.

[¶1]On December 8, 2005, the Disciplinary Board notified the Supreme Court under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.4(D) that it was recommending the reciprocal discipline of Richard E. Edinger, a member of the bar of the State of North Dakota.

[¶2]The Record reflects that the Minnesota Supreme Court filed its opinion on July 28, 2005, indefinitely suspending Edinger from the practice of law in Minnesota, for serious misconduct in connection with an investigation of trust account overdrafts, and for using his trust account as a business and personal account.  Edinger was also required to pay $900 in costs and disbursements, and may seek reinstatement in Minnesota after 3 months. See, Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Edinger, 700 N.W.2d 462 (MN 2005).

[¶3]The Record further reflects on August 8, 2005, the Disciplinary Board served Edinger notice under  N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.4(B) that a certified copy of an order of discipline entered by the Supreme Court of Minnesota was received.  The notice informed Edinger he had 30 days to file any claim that imposition of the identical discipline in North Dakota would be unwarranted and the reasons for the claim.

[¶4]On September 12, 2005, Edinger filed his Response to Reciprocal Discipline Notice, acknowledging the discipline from Minnesota and requesting that he not receive the same discipline as that imposed by Minnesota.  Edinger’s request that he not the same discipline was later withdrawn.

[¶5]On December 8, 2005, the Disciplinary Board forwarded its recommendation under  N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.4(D) to the Supreme Court.  The Disciplinary Board recommends that Edinger be suspended from the practice of law for three months, to begin on or after January 1, 2006.  The Court considered the matter, and

[¶6]ORDERED, Richard E. Edinger is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective January 1, 2006.

[¶7]FURTHER ORDERED, Richard E. Edinger comply with N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 6.3.

[¶8]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

[¶9]The Honorable Carol Ronning Kapsner, deeming herself disqualified, did not participate in this decision.
DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

95-2139.

#### Dayton Bar Assn. v. Overman.

On February 22, 1996, this court permanently disbarred respondent, John Overman, a.k.a. John Laurence Overman, Attorney Registration No. 0044025, and ordered him to immediately cease and desist the practice of law in Ohio, surrender his Certificate of Admission and attorney registration card, file an affidavit of compliance and pay board costs in the amount of $9,119.62. On May 23,1996, this court ordered respondent to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with the court’s order of February 22, 1996. On June 6, 1996, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, *1402filed a motion for an order to show cause and an order to appear, and on August 7, 1996, this court granted the motion and ordered respondent to show cause in writing, by August 27, 1996, why he should not be held in contempt. Respondent did not respond and on September 25, 1996, this court found respondent in contempt and ordered him to appear in person before this court at 9:00 a.m. on October 8,1996. Respondent failed to appear as ordered. On December 26,1996, this court ordered that warrants be issued for the arrest of respondent to the Sheriffs of Montgomery and Butler Counties, and to the sheriffs of such other counties as the contemnor may frequent. On January 10, 1997, warrants for the arrest of respondent were issued to the Sheriffs of Montgomery, Butler and Hamilton Counties.

Respondent was arrested by and is now in the custody of the Sheriff of Hamilton County, and an appearance bond in the amount of $1,000 was set by the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court, conditioned upon respondent’s appearance before this court to answer the contempt charge against him. On February 5, 1997, this court ordered that respondent appear in person before this court on February 18,1997, at 9:00 a.m.

WHEREAS, it has now come to the attention of the court that respondent has failed to post bond,

IT IS ORDERED by this court, *sua sponte,*effective February 13,1997, that a warrant authorizing the Sheriff of Franklin County to take custody of John Overman be issued; that the Sheriff of Hamilton County transport John Overman to and release him to the custody of the Sheriff of Franklin County; that the Sheriff of Franklin County take custody of John Overman; and, that the Sheriff of Franklin County bring John Overman before this court on February 18, 1997, at 11:30 a.m. to answer the contempt charge against him.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*effective February 13, 1997, that service of this order shall be made on respondent by the Sheriff of Hamilton County.
Exhibit
15.1







May 8,
2009





Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, N.E.


Washington,
DC 20549





Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-153151, No. 333-142199, No. 333-142202,
No. 033-52387, No. 333-127223, No. 333-51418, No. 333-49392,
No. 333-47194, No. 333-47665, No. 333-47667, No. 033-65932,
No. 033-65930, and No. 033-28534).





Commissioners:





We are
aware that our reports dated May 8, 2009 on our review of interim financial
information of AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (the “Company”) and
AllianceBernstein L.P. for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
and included in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009 are incorporated by reference in its Registration
Statements referred to above.





Very
truly yours,








/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPNew
      York, New York
NEE-06302013-EX.10a






Exhibit 10(a)




	
						
	Appendix A2
Last Revised On: April 15, 2013

	Name
	Company
	Pre-4/1/1997
Participant
	Class A “Bonus
SERP” Status
	Double Basic
Credits
	Double
Transition
Credits

	CAPLAN, DEBORAH H. *
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	 
	X1
	X1
	 

	KELLIHER, JOSEPH T. *
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	 
	X1
	X1
	 

	RODRIGUEZ, ANTONIO *
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	X
	 
	 
	 

	SIEVING, CHARLES E. *
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	 
	X1
	X1
	 

	SILAGY, ERIC E.
	Florida Power & Light Company
	 
	X1
	X1
	 

	YEAGER, WILLIAM L. *
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	 
	X1
	X1
	 

	CUTLER, PAUL I. *
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	 
	X1
	 
	 

	FROGGATT, CHRIS N. *
	NextEra Energy, Inc
	 
	X1
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	

1The Compensation Committee has expressly identified these items and acknowledged that they are subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.  In particular, these items include: (i) the additional deferred compensation provided by the designation of certain officers as Class A Executives, effective on or after January 1, 2006; and (ii) the additional deferred compensation set forth in SERP Amendment #4 to the Prior Plan (meaning amounts deferred by certain senior officers specified by the Compensation Committee who became participants in the SERP on or after April 1, 1997 at the rate of two times the basic credit and, to the extent applicable, the transition credit under the cash balance formula in the SERP for their pensionable earnings on or after January 1, 2006).  Importantly, nothing in Amendment #4 to the Prior Plan, the SERP, Compensation Committee resolutions, or any other document shall be construed as subjecting to Code Section 409A any deferrals made under the SERP prior to January 1, 2005, except as expressly noted herein.


*Executive Officer of NextEra Energy, Inc.
EXHIBIT 23A

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52405) pertaining to the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 1993 Long Term Incentive Plan,
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52407) pertaining to the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 1993 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors,
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-60327) pertaining to the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 1997 Employee Stock Plan, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-43188) pertaining to the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 2000 Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the
Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 1997 Employee Stock Plan, and the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 1993 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated February 11, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended November 28, 2009.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina

February 11, 2010
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

RAFAEL M. SERRANO , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2758

[ April 21, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey J. Colbath , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2017

- CF

007885

- AXXX

- MB

.
David J. Joffe of Joffe Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for a ppellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed. See Bean v. State , 264 So. 3d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019).

G ROSS , C IKLIN and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 99.2
------------




                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James M. O'Connell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
           of 1934; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
           in all material respects, the financial condition and
           result of operations of the Company.




                                       /s/ James M. O'Connell
                                       ------------------------
                                       James M. O'Connell
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       August 12, 2002
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KHALIL J. GASKIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2320

[December 9, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; William L. Roby, 

Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 562013CF1093B and 562013CF3488A.

Khalil J. Gaskin, Malone, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
***NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION***

***MICS AUDIT CHECKLIST***

***PULL TABS (PT)***

Page 5 of 5
#### Macedonia Church of the Nazarene, Appellant, v Art Alexander et al., Respondents.

[975 NYS2d 873]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered September 5, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment to the extent of finding that defendant The Advisory Board of the Metro New York District Church of the Nazarene is entitled to legal title to the subject property, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly determined that defendant was authorized, pursuant to the terms of the church’s governing manual, to transfer the subject property from plaintiff after its withdrawal from the Church of the Nazarene *(see generally First Presbyt. Church of Schenectady v United Presbyt. Church in U.S. of Am.,*62 NY2d 110, 117-118 [1984], *cert denied*469 US 1037 [1984]). Concur — Tom, J.R, Friedman, Renwick, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
*Friday, April 4, 1997*

MOTION DOCKET

96-330.

#### Cherovsky v. St. Luke’s Hosp. of Cleveland.

Cuyahoga App. No. 68326. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for continuance of oral argument currently scheduled for May 20,1997,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for continuance of oral argument be, and hereby is, denied.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 22 (a)

                                 SUBSIDIARIES

                                       OF

                          MINUTEMAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.



Multi-Clean Division of Minuteman International, Inc.
600 Cardigan Road
Shoreview, Minnesota  55126

Minuteman Canada, Inc.
2210 Drew Road
Mississauga
Ontario L5S 1B1 Canada

Minuteman International Foreign Sales Corporation
c/o Ernst & Young Services, Ltd.
P.O. Box 261 Bay Street
Bridgetown, Barbados

Minuteman European B.V.
Haverstraat 31
2153 GB Nieuw-Vennep
The Netherlands

Minuteman PowerBoss, Inc.
175 Anderson Street
Aberdeen, North Carolina 28315















                                       17
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000031224
<NAME> EASTERN UTILITIES ASSOCIATES
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       721086
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     219714
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          135419
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        124054
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1200273
<COMMON>                                        102184
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       216817
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              56228
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  375229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            26218
<PREFERRED>                                       6937
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            434871
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               39540
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    19506
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           50
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  297922
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1200273
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       563363
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             17015
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      474620
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      491635
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          71728
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                4677
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   76405
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         41458
<NET-INCOME>                                     34947
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       2321
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    32626
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         32050
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        38216
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          112963
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>