alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 42 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 42

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 15, 2019.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Appropriations: Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Serrano, Ms. 
DeLauro, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, 
Ms. Lee of California, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Ryan, Mr. Ruppersberger, Ms. Wasserman 
Schultz, Mr. Cuellar, Ms. Pingree, Mr. Quigley, Mr. Kilmer, Mr. Cartwright, Ms. 
Meng, Mr. Pocan, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. Aguilar, Ms. Frankel, Mrs. 
Bustos, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mrs. Lawrence, Mrs. Torres of California, Mr. 
Crist, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, and Mr. Case.
    Committee on Armed Services: Mrs. Davis of California, Mr. Langevin, Mr. 
Larsen of Washington, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Courtney, Mr. Garamendi, Ms. Speier, Ms. 
Gabbard, Mr. Norcross, Mr. Gallego, Mr. Moulton, Mr. Carbajal, Mr. Brown of 
Maryland, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Keating, Mr. Vela, Mr. Kim, Ms. Kendra S. Horn of 
Oklahoma, Mr. Cisneros, Ms. Houlahan, Mr. Crow, Ms. Torres Small of New Mexico, 
Ms. Slotkin, Ms. Sherrill, Ms. Hill of California, Ms. Escobar, Ms. Haaland, Mr. 
Golden, Mrs. Trahan, and Mrs. Luria.
    Committee on Education and Labor: Mrs. Davis of California, Mr. Grijalva, 
Mr. Courtney, Ms. Fudge, Mr. Sablan, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. 
Takano, Ms. Adams, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr. Norcross, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Mr. 
Espaillat, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Morelle, Ms. Wild, Mr. Harder of California, Mrs. 
McBath, Ms. Schrier, Ms. Underwood, Mrs. Hayes, Ms. Shalala, Mr. Levin of 
Michigan, Ms. Omar, Mr. Trone, Ms. Stevens, and Mrs. Lee of Nevada.
    Committee on Energy and Commerce: Mr. Rush, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Engel, Ms. 
DeGette, Mr. Michael F. Doyle of Pennsylvania, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Butterfield, 
Ms. Matsui, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. McNerney, Mr. Welch, Mr. 
Lujan, Mr. Tonko, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Loebsack, Mr. Schrader, Mr. 
Kennedy, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Ruiz, Mr. Peters, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Veasey, Ms. 
Kuster of New Hampshire, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Ms. Barragan, Mr. McEachin, Ms. 
Blunt Rochester, Mr. Soto, and Mr. O'Halleran.
    Committee on Ways and Means: Mr. Lewis, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Thompson of 
California, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Kind, Mr. Pascrell, 
Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Higgins of New York, Ms. Sewell 
of Alabama, Ms. DelBene, Ms. Judy Chu of California, Ms. Moore, Mr. Kildee, Mr. 
Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Evans, Mr. Schneider, Mr. 
Suozzi, Mr. Panetta, Mrs. Murphy, Mr. Gomez, and Mr. Horsford.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7827

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BOBBY FORRESTER SPOONE, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-98-178, CA-02-3039-6-13)

Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 25, 2003

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Forrester Spoone, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun

Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Forrester Spoone, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000).

When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion solely on

procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue

unless the movant can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason

would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim

of the denial of a constitutional right and (2) ‘that jurists of

reason would find it debatable whether the district court was

correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684

(4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)),

cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Spoone has not made the requisite

showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 2003 WL 431659,

*10 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2003) (No. 01-7662). We deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Spoone’s motion

to consolidate the matter with another of Spoone’s pending appeals,

No. 02-7480. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
@article{1206256,
  author = {Justyna Zwolak and Jacob Taylor},
  title = {Colloquium: Advances in automation of quantum dot devices control},
  year = {2023},
  number = {95},
  month = {2023-02-17 05:02:00},
  publisher = {Reviews of Modern Physics},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=933831},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.011006},
  language = {en},
}
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) of Sterling
Banks, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we, Robert H King, President and Chief Executive Officer, and R.
Scott Horner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Robert H.
      King
            /s/R.
      Scott HornerRobert
      H. King
            R.
      Scott HornerPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








Date: May
14, 2009
FORM OF CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 AND 15d-14
              UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Charles Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Crown Partners, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 18, 2005                      /s/ Charles Smith
                                        Name: Charles Smith
                                        Title: CEO
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Thompson, Appellant.

[608 NYS2d 674]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Plug, J.), rendered June 2, 1992, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*455Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant argues that the court erred in rendering its *Sandoval*ruling. We disagree. A *Sandoval*ruling is addressed to the sound discretion of the hearing court *(see, People v Pavao,*59 NY2d 282; *People v Mackey,*49 NY2d 274; *People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371). We find the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion. The record indicates that the trial court weighed the competing factors when it limited inquiry on cross-examination to five misdemeanors and two drug-related felonies without discussion of the underlying facts *(see, People v Pavao, supra; People v Williams,*56 NY2d 236; *People v Sandoval, supra).*Further, the mere similarity between the prior felony convictions and the crime charged was insufficient to preclude its use on cross-examination *(see, People v Rahman,*46 NY2d 882; *People v Hendrix,*44 NY2d 658).

The defendant contends that the undercover officer’s testimony regarding the description of the seller which he transmitted to the arresting officer by radio constitutes bolstering in violation of *People v Trowbridge*(305 NY 471). This argument is without merit. The testimony, together with that of the arresting officer who received the description, provided a necessary explanation of the events which precipitated the defendant’s arrest *(see, People v Cardona,*173 AD2d 364; *People v Sarmiento,*168 AD2d 328, *affd*77 NY2d 976; *People v Candelario,*156 AD2d 191; *People v Love,*92 AD2d 551).

The defendant further contends that the court’s charge on the issue identification was inadequate. We disagree. The Supreme Court’s identification charge was adequate under the circumstances of this case since the court instructed the jury that identification had to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt and provided the jury with general instructions in weighing a witness’s credibility *(see, People v Whalen,*59 NY2d 273, 279; *People v Foxworth,*197 AD2d 703; *People v Nichols,*191 AD2d 518).

The closure of the courtroom during the testimony of the undercover police officer was proper, since it was determined at a hearing that the undercover officer was still operating in a particular location readily accessible to the defendant and closure was necessary to protect his safety and the integrity of ongoing investigations *(see, People v Martinez, 82*NY2d 436; *People v McLennon,*156 AD2d 478; *People v Bowden,*156 AD2d 372; *People v Osborne,*154 AD2d 484). The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Pizzuto, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            4313
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    23233
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 31889
<PP&E>                                        29786183
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                29837987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4143020
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    25694967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  29837987
<SALES>                                         301557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                428491
<CGS>                                            96237
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    55461
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                239345
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  37448
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              37448
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     37448
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.32
        

</TABLE>
#### Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee under Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of August 1, 2005 Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2005-WHQ4, Respondent, v Oswald Russell, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Submitted February 25, 2013;

decided September 10, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
IV 

House Calendar No. 25 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 415 

[Report No. 116–102] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6) to authorize the cancellation 

of removal and adjustment of status of certain aliens, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2019 

Ms. SHALALA, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6) to authorize 

the cancellation of removal and adjustment of status 

of certain aliens, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 6) to authorize the cancellation of removal and adjustment 

4 of status of certain aliens, and for other purposes. All 

5 points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. 

6 An amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting 

7 of the text of Rules Committee Print 116-16, modified by 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 415 RH 

1 the amendment printed in the report of the Committee 

2 on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered 

3 as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as 

4 read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as 

5 amended, are waived. The previous question shall be con6 sidered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any 

7 further amendment thereto, to final passage without inter8 vening motion except: (1) two hours of debate equally di9 vided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 

10 member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one 

11 motion to recommit with or without instructions. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 25 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 415 

[Report No. 116–102] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6) to 

purposes. ment of status of certain aliens, and for other authorize the cancellation of removal and adjustJUNE 3, 2019 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 462 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                  House Calendar No. 33
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 462

                          [Report No. 116-128]

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3401) making emergency 
 supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     2019, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2019

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3401) making emergency 
 supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     2019, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3401) making emergency 
supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2019, and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration 
of the bill are waived. The amendment printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as 
adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points 
of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. Clause 
2(e) of rule XXI shall not apply during consideration of the bill. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 
amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
                                                  House Calendar No. 33

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 462

                          [Report No. 116-128]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3401) making emergency 
 supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     2019, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 25, 2019

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of NMC Global Corporation, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, NMC Global Corporation, 1100 Walnut St., Roselle, NJ 07203, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of NMC Global Corporation, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on April 1, 2009. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for April 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: June 18, 2009.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services. 

[FR Doc. E9-14893 Filed 6-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P