alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3637 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3637

    To authorize appropriations for the Housing Assistance Council.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 22, 2010

   Mr. Kohl (for himself, Ms. Snowe, and Mr. Inouye) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize appropriations for the Housing Assistance Council.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Housing Assistance Council Program 
Reauthorization Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE TO HOUSING ASSISTANCE COUNCIL.

    (a) Use.--The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may 
provide financial assistance to the Housing Assistance Council for use 
by such Council to develop the ability and capacity of community-based 
housing development organizations to undertake community development 
and affordable housing projects and programs in rural areas. Assistance 
provided by the Secretary under this section may be used by the Housing 
Assistance Council for--
            (1) technical assistance, training, support, and advice to 
        develop the business and administrative capabilities of rural 
        community-based housing development organizations;
            (2) loans, grants, or other financial assistance to rural 
        community-based housing development organizations to carry out 
        community development and affordable housing activities for 
        low- and moderate-income families; and
            (3) such other activities as may be determined by the 
        Housing Assistance Council.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated for fiscal years 2012 through 2017 such sums as are 
necessary for financial assistance under this section for the Housing 
Assistance Council.
                                 <all>
```
FOR PUBLICATION



### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD K. HOOKS, Regional

Director of the Ninetee nth Region of the National Labor Relations Board,

for and on behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Petitioner

- Appellee,

v.

NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.,

DBA KOIN

- TV,

Respondent

- Appellant. No. 21

- 35252

D.C. No.

3:21

- cv

- 0 0177

- MO

O RDER

Filed June 29, 2023

Before: William A. Fletcher, Sandra S. Ikuta, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges.2 H OOKS V

. N EXSTAR B ROADCASTING

, I NC

.

ORDER

The petition for rehearing en banc, filed January, 19, 2023, is DENIED . (Dkt. 57). The majority of the panel has voted to deny appellee’s petition for rehearing. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority o f votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(a). Judge Forrest did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.
ACCEPTED

01-15-00591-cv

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/14/2015 4:41:28 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/14/2015 4:41:28 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The  undersigned hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-B  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 8th day of January, 2003.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP II-B
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Cumberland, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 284]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), rendered March 31, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of rape in the first degree, three counts of sodomy in the first degree, three counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, three counts of kidnapping in the second degree and two counts of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 1752/s to 185 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating each of the kidnapping convictions and dismissing those counts of the indictment, and otherwise affirmed.

The court’s conduct did not deprive defendant of a fair trial *(see e.g. People v Gonzalez,*251 AD2d 51, 52-53 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 982 [1998]).

While, in cross-examination of defendant about a knife found among his effects in his brother’s apartment, the People should not have asked questions that assumed facts not yet in evidence, we find that the error does not warrant reversal in view of the court’s instructions and the overwhelming evidence of *484defendant’s guilt. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining arguments concerning the knife (see *People v Del Yermo,*192 NY 470, 478-482 [1908]).

As the People concede, all three kidnapping charges merged with the underlying crimes (see *People v Cassidy,*40 NY2d 763, 767 [1976]).

The arguments contained in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000851724
<NAME>                         GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-G
                                
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                            1,745,845
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       482,613
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,228,458
<PP&E>                           23,923,956
<DEPRECIATION>                   19,133,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    7,142,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               109,997
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                        6,968,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      7,142,675
<SALES>                           1,748,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  3,142,327
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,046,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   2,095,788
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               2,095,788
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                      2,095,788
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          5.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        
 

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 24**

POWER OF ATTORNEY

        We,the undersigned Directors and Officers of The Black & Decker Corporation (the“Corporation”), hereby constitute and appoint Nolan D. Archibald, Michael D.Mangan and Charles E. Fenton, and each of them, with power of substitution, our trueand lawful attorneys-in-fact with full power to sign for us, in our names and in thecapacities indicated below, the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2007, and any and all amendments thereto.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark A. Imes, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Independent BancShares, Inc.;
2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.      The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

      (a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

      (b) [Intentionally Omitted];      

      (c)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

      (d)       Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

5.      The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

      (a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

      (b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  November 6, 2006
By: /S/ Mark A. Imes
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leticia AGUILAR-TERAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40526.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Leticia Aguilar-Teran (Aguilar) appeals her sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1324 for two counts of transporting an illegal alien. Aguilar asserts that the district court violated the Due Process and Ex Post Facto Clauses by sentencing her in accordance *499with the remedial portion of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), when she committed the offenses before *Booker*was issued. While this appeal was pending, we rejected this argument. *See United States v. Austin,*432 F.3d 598, 599-600 (5th Cir.2005).

Aguilar also asserts that the district court violated her rights under the Sixth Amendment by increasing her sentence based upon facts that were neither included in the indictment nor admitted by her. This argument is meritless because Aguilar was sentenced after *Booker*was issued. *See United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 553 (5th Cir.2006).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lance J. Reed, Appellant.

Submitted November 13, 2012;

decided November 19, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Timothy E Donaher, Esq., Monroe County Public Defender, 10 N. Fitzhugh Street, Rochester, New York 14614 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: JUAN CARLOS BERMUDEZ,

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00200-CV

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Juan Carlos Bermudez, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the 

Honorable Laura Strathmann, Judge of the 388th District Court of El Paso County, Texas, 

challenging an order denying Relator’s motion to withdraw deemed admissions. Relator has also 

filed a motion requesting a stay of the trial set for July 13, 2015. We deny the relief sought in 

the emergency motion and the mandamus petition. 

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must meet two requirements. First, the 

relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance 

Company of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate 

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 135-36. Based on the record before us, we 

conclude that Relator has failed to establish he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we 

deny Relator’s emergency motion for stay and the petition for writ of mandamus.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

July 9, 2015

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Rodriguez, J., dissenting
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JAVIER PONCE CASTELLON, a.k.a.

Harvey Castellon, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

No. 14-50213 

D.C. No. 8:98-cr-00143-DDP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017**

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Javier Ponce Castellon appeals from the district court’s order denying his 

pro se motion to reopen, which challenged his conviction and sentence for multiple 

drug trafficking offenses. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we 

vacate and remand.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 20 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-50213 

Castellon contends that the district court erred by failing to recharacterize his 

motion to reopen as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and ordering the government to 

respond. The district court’s order denying Castellon’s motion to reopen does not 

disclose the basis for its decision. However, the court may have mistakenly 

believed, based on a docketing error, that in 2005, a section 2255 motion had been 

filed on Castellon’s behalf and denied on the merits. Because the relief Castellon 

sought in his motion to reopen is available only through a section 2255 motion and 

he has not filed a first section 2255 motion, we vacate and remand with 

instructions that the district court evaluate Castellon’s motion as one arising under 

section 2255. See United States v. Eatinger, 902 F.2d 1383, 1385 (9th Cir. 1990).1 

We express no opinion as to the merits of Castellon’s claims.

VACATED and REMANDED.

 

1 Recharacterized as a section 2255 habeas, Castellon’s motion appears to be 

untimely. Any such finding, however, cannot be made until the district court 

follows the procedures set forth in Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375, 383 

(2003).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VINCENT KANE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 289 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of October, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

and “Motion for Leave to File a Short Reply and Exhibit to Answer” are DENIED.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 309 

Recognizing the 44th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Mr. LOWENTHAL (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. CORREA, Mrs. 

DAVIS of California, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. CISNEROS, Ms. LEE of California, 

Mr. ROUDA, and Ms. LOFGREN) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the 

Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 44th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on 

April 30, 1975. 

Whereas since 1975, hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese 

have resettled in the United States and built vibrant 

communities across the United States which contribute to 

the rich diversity of the Nation; 

Whereas, on April 30, 1975, the Republic of Vietnam was 

overthrown by communist forces in an event known as 

‘‘Black April’’ or the ‘‘Fall of Saigon’’, which is observed 

in Vietnamese American communities across the United 

States each year; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 309 IH 

Whereas members of the South Vietnamese military fought 

side-by-side with the United States Armed Forces in defense of the ideals of democracy and freedom; 

Whereas Vietnamese Americans have continuously advocated 

for freedom and democracy in Vietnam, and spoken out 

against human rights abuses by the Vietnamese Government; and 

Whereas Vietnam continues to hold one of the worst records 

on human rights in the region, violating religious freedom, obstructing press freedom, restricting its own citizens’ freedom of speech and assembly, and detaining 

prisoners of conscience: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the significance of the 44th anni3 versary of the Fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975; 

4 (2) honors the contributions of Vietnamese 

5 Americans to the United States over the last 44 

6 years and their tireless commitment to upholding 

7 freedom, human rights, and democracy in Vietnam; 

8 (3) honors the service of members of the United 

9 States Armed Forces and of the South Vietnamese 

10 forces who fought in Vietnam, including those who 

11 gave their lives; 

12 (4) honors the memory of the Vietnamese who 

13 lost their lives while attempting to flee Vietnam; and 

14 (5) encourages all citizens of the United States 

15 to join in remembering the Fall of Saigon, honoring 

16 the contributions of the Vietnamese American comVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:42 Apr 10, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR309.IH HR309

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 309 IH 

1 munity, and calling for freedom, human rights, and 

2 democracy in Vietnam. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS