alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CONTROLLER

I, Susan M. Knutson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Good Times Restaurants Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

 

Susan M. Knutson

Controller

August 9, 2006
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 14-3009

_____________

ZACHARY BARKER; 

FRANCIS X. BOYD, JR.; DAVID W. SMITH

v.

THE BOEING COMPANY

Francis X. Boyd, Jr. and David W. Smith,

 Appellants 

 

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

District Court No. 2-12-cv-06684

District Judge: The Honorable Luis Felipe Restrepo

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)

July 13, 2015

Before: SMITH, GREENAWAY, JR., and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges

____________________ 

JUDGMENT ORDER

____________________ 

This cause came on to be considered on the record from the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was submitted on July 13, 2015. 

Francis X. Boyd, Jr., and David W. Smith, both of whom are Caucasian, alleged that 

their former employer, the Boeing Company, discriminated against them on the basis of 

their race, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, when it terminated their employment after 
2

they appeared in a photograph taken at work with a third employee looking like members 

of the KKK. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of Boeing. It 

concluded that Boyd and Smith failed to establish a prima facie case of race 

discrimination because they were not similarly situated to Kenta Smith, the AfricanAmerican employee who took the photograph and reported the incident. In addition, the 

Court reasoned that “[e]ven if a jury could somehow find that the evidence met the prima 

facie threshold,” “[t]here is no evidence that could lead a reasonable jury to conclude that 

Boeing did not really fire the plaintiffs for posing as the KKK, or that a more likely cause 

was Boeing’s animus toward” Caucasians. A10. This timely appeal followed.

The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Appellate jurisdiction 

exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We exercise plenary review over an order granting 

summary judgment. Brown v. J. Kaz, Inc., 581 F.3d 175, 179 (3d Cir. 2009). For 

substantially the same grounds set forth in the well-reasoned opinion of the District 

Court, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment in favor of Boeing. 

On consideration whereof, it is now hereby ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the 

judgment of the District Court entered May 15, 2014, be and the same is hereby 

AFFIRMED. Costs taxed against Appellants.

By the Court,

s/D. Brooks Smith

Circuit Judge
3

Attest:

s/Marcia M. Waldron

Clerk

DATED: July 14, 2015
Exhibit 10.2

May 27,2008

**Private & Confidential**

Ms. Elizabeth Keys160 W. 7th Street, Apt. 3ANew York, NY 10024

Dear Beth,

     We are pleased to confirm your continued employment with XL Financial Administrative Services ("XLFAS") and your promotion to the title of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Security Capital Assurance Ltd (SCA, and together withXLFAS the "Company"), effective June 1,2008, reporting to Paul Giordano, CEOof SCA. Accordingly:

1. **Functions & Responsibilties:**Your functions andresponsibilties shallinclude, but are not limitedto: (i) managing all Finance Department functions, including oversight of financialofficers; (ii) overseeing and directing all financialaccounting functions, including responsibility for all SEC and U.S. public company accounting, financial reporting, accounting policy and procedures; (iii) developing policy for producing accounting  information for business units and product lines, including analyzing and directing allocation methodologies, cost accounting and overhead procedures; (iv) directing short term business  planning and budgeting, and long-range forecasting; (v) directing and coordinating short and long term earnings management programs; (v) assuming such other reasonably related responsibilties, as provided by the CEO in his discretion; and (vi) serving as a member of theExecutive Committee.
2. **Salary and Bonus:** Your base annualized salary willbe (USD) $300,000("Base Salary"),and you wil be eligible for benefits and perquisites associatedwith an SVP title. In addition, your target bonus will increase to100%("Target Bonus") of your Base Salary and your potential longtermincentive award opportunity will be targetedat 75% of your total cash (base plus bonus) compensation.
3. **Bonus for 2008:** For the 2008 Plan year, youare eligible to receive acashbonus in the gross amount of (USD) $300,000, subject to the following conditions.This bonus will be paid to you in two equal installments. In order to qualify for the first installment of the 2008 bonus, you must remain an active employee in good standing through the date that such bonus is paid which we anticipate will be no later than  August 31, 2008. However, if your employment is terminated by the Company without cause prior to suchpayment, or in the case of your death or disability prior to such payment, you

----
#### Alson Alston, Appellant, v New York City Commission on Human Rights et al., Respondents.

Submitted July 30, 2012;

decided September 18, 2012

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the February 2012 Appellate Division order as denied appellant’s motion for poor person relief and dismissed his appeal from the March 2010 Supreme Court order, dismissed upon the ground that such portions of the Appellate Division order do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Exhibit 10.15


 


Amendment Number 1


to the


Scholastic Corporation


2011 Stock Incentive Plan


 


1. The following amendments
are made effective as of May 21, 2013 to the Scholastic Corporation 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (“Plan”):


 


(a) Section 6.3(a) of
the Plan is amended by deleting such section in its entirety and replacing it with the following:


 


“(a)  GRANT PRICE. The grant price per share of Common Stock
shall be determined by the Committee, but shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock at the
time of grant.”


 


(b) References to “exercise
price” throughout the Plan and related Stock Option Agreements shall be replaced with the term “grant price”.


 


(c) Article VI of the
Plan is amended by adding new Section 6.3(g) as follows:


 


“(g)  AUTOMATIC EXERCISE. The Plan administrator may provide
in a Stock Option Agreement or otherwise that any Stock Option outstanding on the last business day of the term of such Stock Option
(“Automatic Exercise Date”) that has a “Specified Minimum Value” shall be automatically and without further
action by the Participant (or in the event of the Participant’s death, the Participant’s personal representative or estate), be
exercised on the Automatic Exercise Date. Payment of the grant price of such Stock Option may be made pursuant to such procedures
as may be approved by the Plan administrator from time to time and the Company shall deduct or withhold an amount sufficient to
satisfy all taxes associated with such exercise in accordance with Section 12.4. For purposes of this Section 6.3(g), the term
“Specified Minimum Value” means that the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock exceeds the grant price of a share
subject to an expiring Stock Option by at least $0.50 cents per share or such other amount as the Plan administrator shall determine
from time to time. The Plan administrator may elect to discontinue the automatic exercise of Stock Options pursuant to this Section
6.3(g) at any time upon notice to a Participant. The automatic exercise of a Stock Option pursuant to this Section 6.3(g) shall
apply only to a Stock Option award that has been timely accepted by a Participant under procedures specified by the Plan administrator
from time to time.”


 


(d) The Plan Administrator may offer to a Participant to
amend any Stock Option Agreements outstanding on the date of this Amendment to incorporate the automatic exercise provisions of
new Section 6.3(g).



    	 



    	



    
Exhibit 10.15

 


2. Except as specifically amended by the foregoing, the Plan
remains in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof prior to such amendment.


 


3. The foregoing amendment
was duly approved by resolution of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Scholastic Corporation
at its meeting held on May 21, 2013 and shall become effective on May 21, 2013.
***EXHIBIT 32***

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In        connection with the report on Form 10-QSB of High End Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly        period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the        date hereof (“Report”), I, Nadir Walji, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18        U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,        that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents,                        in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business                        issuer at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of                        operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this                        Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/        Nadir Walji

Nadir        Walji

Chief        Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

February        14, 2008

 

This        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of        2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be        deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference        into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange        Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report),        irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed        original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small        business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

30
#### Aleksander Goldin, as Executor of Rakhil Goldin, Deceased, Appellant, v New York and Presbyterian Hospital et al., Defendants, and Arnold Leon Weg, Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 892]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated January 12, 2012, which granted the motion of the defendant Arnold Leon Weg for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and in the *579exercise of discretion, with costs, and the motion of the defendant Arnold Leon Weg for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him is denied.

On or about November 7, 2007, the plaintiff commenced this action against, among others, the defendant Arnold Leon Weg. The plaintiff filed the note of issue on July 14, 2011. On September 19, 2011, Weg moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him. The Supreme Court granted the motion.

Pursuant to the Uniform Civil Term Rules of the Supreme Court, Bangs County, Weg was required to make his motion for summary judgment no later than 60 days after the filing of the note of issue, unless he obtained leave of the court on good cause shown *(see*Kings County Supreme Court Uniform Civil Term Rules, part C, rule 6). Here, Weg moved for summary judgment 67 days after the note of issue was filed. He failed to demonstrate, in his moving papers, good cause for not filing the motion before the expiration of the 60-day deadline set forth in Kings County Supreme Court Uniform Civil Term Rules, part C, rule 6 *(see Brill v City of New York,*2 NY3d 648 [2004]). It was an improvident exercise of the Supreme Court’s discretion to entertain the summary judgment motion and to consider the good cause arguments raised for the first time in Weg’s reply papers *(see St. John’s Univ. v Butler Rogers Baskett Architects, P.C.,*105 AD3d 728 [2013]; *Cabibel v XYZ Assoc., L.P.,*36 AD3d 498 [2007]). Accordingly, Weg’s motion should have been denied as untimely. Angiolillo, J.P, Dickerson, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ, concur.
EXHIBIT 10.17

                       ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE

                THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE (this "AGREEMENT") is
made as of August 4, 2006, by and between GLOBAL CREDIT ANALYTICS, INC., a
Delaware corporation ("ASSIGNOR") and XL CAPITAL ASSURANCE INC., a New York
stock insurance corporation ("ASSIGNEE").

                For and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and
other good and valuable consideration paid by Assignee to Assignor, the receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor hereby assigns,
transfers, sets over and conveys to Assignee, all of Assignor's right, title and
interest in and to that certain (i) Lease dated August 5, 1999 between 250 Park
Avenue LLC, as landlord, and Assignor, as tenant (the "LEASE") and (ii)
Agreement of Sublease dated April 7, 2003 between Assignor, as sublessor, and
Miller Buckfire Lewis & Co., LLC, as sublessee (the "SUBLEASE"). Assignee hereby
accepts the assignment and agrees to assume, fulfill, perform and discharge all
the various commitments, obligations and liabilities of Assignor, as tenant
under the Lease, and as sublandlord under the Sublease, in accordance with the
terms of the Lease and the Sublease, as the case may be.

                This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon
the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. This Agreement
shall be governed by, and construed under, the laws of the State of New York.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee do hereby execute and
deliver this Agreement as of the date and year first above written.

                                        ASSIGNOR:
                                        ---------

                                        GLOBAL CREDIT ANALYTICS, INC., a
                                        Delaware corporation
                                        By: /s/ Edward B. Hubbard
                                           -----------------------------
                                             Name: Edward B. Hubbard
                                             Title:

                                        ASSIGNEE:
                                        ---------

                                        XL CAPITAL ASSURANCE INC.
                                        a New York stock insurance corporation
                                        By: /s/ Edward B. Hubbard
                                           -----------------------------
                                             Name: Edward B. Hubbard
                                             Title:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60451 Summary Calendar

__________________
JERRY LYNN YOUNG, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus RAYMOND ROBERTS, Superintendent; Mississippi State Penitentiary; State of Mississippi, Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:92CV81-S-D

- - - - - - - - - - June 5, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jerry Lynn Young appeals the district court's denial of his motion to set aside the court's earlier order dismissing his second habeas corpus petition as successive under Rule 9(b) of the Rules Governing 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Proceedings. Because Young has not demonstrated a "change in the law" which would undermineNo. -2- the dismissal of his petition, we AFFIRM the district court's denial of Young's motion.
Exhibit 10.52



LOAN AGREEMENT



The parties to this Loan Agreement, dated
as of August 16, 2013, are VelaTel Global Communications, Inc. (“Borrower”), and AQT, LLC (“Lender”).



FOR VALUE RECEIVED Borrower promises to
pay to the order of Lender the sum of Six Hundred Thousand and 00/100 U.S. Dollars (“Principal Amount”), together with
interest at the rate of 5% per annum. The entire Loan shall be due and payable on or before January 27, 2014 (“Maturity”).
As a commitment fee to Lender to cause Lender to fund, Borrower shall also cause its Peruvian subsidiary VelaTel Peru, S.A. to
transfer to Lender’s Peruvian subsidiary or affiliate title to 30 cellular towers pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement
of the same date as this Loan Agreement.



Per Borrower’s request, Lender funded
$600,000 directly to China Motions Holdings on or about June 27, 2013 in furtherance of Borrower’s purchase note obligation
for its acquisition of China Motion Telecom (HK) Ltd.



Borrower may repay the Principal Amount
plus accrued interest, at Borrower’s option, through any combination of (1) cash, and/or (2) transfer to Lender of shares
of the capital stock of Borrower’s subsidiary China Motion Telecom (HK) Ltd., 100% of which capital stock is valued for purposes
of repayment at $6,437,100.



Should this Loan Agreement be placed in
the hands of an attorney for collection, Borrower promises to pay such reasonable attorney fees and other costs of collection as
Lender may incur, whether or not suit is brought. Borrower hereby waives demand, presentment, notice of dishonor, diligence in
collecting, grace and notice of protest.



This Loan Agreement may be signed in as
many counterparts as may be necessary, each of which so signed shall be deemed to be an original (and each signed copy sent by
electronic facsimile transmission shall be deemed to be an original), such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same
instrument and, notwithstanding the date of the execution, shall be deemed to bear the date as set forth above.





|VELATEL GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. |                                             | AQT, LLC |    
|----------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | -------- | ---
|                                    |                                             |          |    
|                                    |                                             |          |    
|By:                                 | /s/George Alvarez                           |          | By:
|                                    | George Alvarez, its Chief Executive Officer |          |    
|                                    |                                             |          |    







1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sentry Petroleum Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Raj Rajeswaran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 8th day of July, 2009.

| |     |                                                           
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                           
| | BY: | RAJ RAJESWARANRaj Rajeswaran, 
Principal Executive Officer