alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lingfei Sun, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Defendants, and New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 18, 2013;

decided February 19, 2013

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*20 NY3d 854 (2012)].

Judge Rivera taking no part.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

STEPHEN J. SZABO AND MARY B. 

SZABO,

Respondents

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 184 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all 

remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) By failing to file preliminary objections pursuant to section 306 of the 

Eminent Domain Code, 26 Pa.C.S. § 306, did Respondents waive their 

right to assert ownership and seek additional just compensation for the 

condemnation of two parcels which were allegedly mistakenly depicted as 

belonging to two other legal entities in plans attached to the declaration of 

taking? 

(2) Did Petitioner’s alleged mistake in the plans attached to a declaration of 

taking, constitute the failure to adequately establish the extent or effect of 

the taking, thereby excusing Respondents from filing preliminary 

objections under section 306 of the Eminent Domain Code. See

Pennsylvania Dep’t Gen. Servs., 714 A.2d 1159 (Pa. Commw. 1998) and 

Pennsylvania Dep’t Trans. v. Greenfield Twp. Prop. Owners, 582 A.2d 41 

(Pa. Commw. 1990)?
#### In the Matter of the Acquisition of Real Property by the Village of Saranac Lake, Respondent; Wayne Bujold et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents. (And 10 Other Related Proceedings.)

Submitted July 16, 2012;

decided September 11, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceedings within the meaning of the Constitution.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                       BANKERS TRUST NEW YORK CORPORATION
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                                DECEMBER 31, 1995

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     Subsidiary(1)                                              State of Incorporation
     -------------                                              ----------------------
<S>                                                             <C>
Bankers Trust Company                                                  New York
BT Securities Corporation                                              Delaware
BT Holdings (NY) Inc.                                                  New York
Bankers Trust (Delaware)                                               Delaware
</TABLE>

All other subsidiaries of the Corporation, in the aggregate, would not 
constitute a significant subsidiary, as defined.



(1) Subsidiaries' names listed hereon are names under which such subsidiaries
    do business.

                        BANKERS TRUST NEW YORK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  137
# Maximizing Data Transparency with Rigor Icons

Scientific meetings are an important venue for disseminating findings, but space and time for experimental design details is often limited. Thus, to facilitate increased transparency in scientific presentations, rigor icons can quickly and easily convey experimental design details as described in this paper.
> Rigor icons are simple symbols that can be added to figures to easily convey important experimental design details in scientific presentations.

Different sets of rigor icons will be valuable to different communities. However, a core set of reporting standards, including measures to minimize the risk of bias, are integral experimental design elements that are broadly applicable.

A proposed set of fundamental rigor icons is presented below:
> Adding rigor icons to figures in scientific presentations maximizes data transparency and provides important information without taking up additional space:Image
The same data are represented as (L) bar graphs with vague error bars and (R) a quantile boxplot showing the mean (purple diamond), sample size, individual data points, and the range for data spread. The rigor icons represent (left to right) blinding/masking, randomization, and sample size estimation. The graph on the right, with the same amount of space, conveys more detailed information about the methods and analysis. This figure is modified from Silberberg, et al.

> Additional Resources:- Flyer  (pdf, 365 KB)  describing the icons in more detail
- File repository  with the individual icons, the descriptive flyer, and a presentation slide
- Presentation  by NINDS Director Walter Koroshetz about using the icons
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Spherix Incorporated**

 

----

 

**Certification of**

**Chief ExecutiveOfficer**

**Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Claire L. Kruger, Chief Executive Officer and Chief OperatingOfficer of Spherix Incorporated (the “Company”), in compliance with Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of myknowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2008 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

 

·                  Fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

·                  The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Claire L. Kruger                                |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Claire L. Kruger                                    |
|   | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer |
|   | March 27, 2009                                 |

 

A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Spherix Incorporated and will be retained by SpherixIncorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (09-055)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council. The agenda for the meeting includes updates from each of the Council committees, including discussion and deliberation of potential recommendations. The Council Committees address NASA's work in the following areas: Aeronautics, Audit and Finance, Space Exploration, Human Capital, Science, and Space Operations.

# DATES:

Thursday, July 16, 2009, 8 a.m.-4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Columbia Ballroom, The Holiday Inn Capitol, 550 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Marguerite Broadwell, Designated Federal Official, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 20546, 202/358-1894.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the seating capacity of the room. It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Dated: June 16, 2009.

P. Diane Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-14605 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
July 9, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CYRIL J. SMITH, JR., Appellant

NO. 14-14-00185-CV V.

SAIHAT CORPORATION, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Saihat 

Corporation, signed, November 27, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. 

We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the 

judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Cyril J. Smith, Jr. to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### K2 Investment Group, LLC, et al., Respondents-Appellants, v American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Company, Appellant-Respondent.

Submitted July 29, 2013;

decided September 3, 2013

Motion by Complex Insurance Claims Litigation Association et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the motion for re-argument herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed *[see 21*NY3d 384 (2013)].

Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 16-1543V 

(not to be published) 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

TINA L. ESKELIN, * November 21, 2017 

 * 

 * Joint Stipulation of Dismissal; 

 Petitioner, * Rule 21(a); No Judgment; Order 

 * Concluding Proceedings 

 v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND *

HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 *

 Respondent. *

 *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 

 On November 20, 2017, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(B), the parties filed a joint 

stipulation stating that above-captioned case should be dismissed. 

 Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(3), the above-captioned case is hereby 

dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall 

not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Brian H. Corcoran

 Brian H. Corcoran

 Special Master
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jerry M. Kennelly, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Riverbed Technology, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Riverbed Technology, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: April 29, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Jerry M. Kennelly                                                                
|                     |  |  |  | Jerry M. Kennelly President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Randy S. Gottfried, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Riverbed Technology, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Riverbed Technology, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: April 29, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Randy S. Gottfried                                                                 
|                     |  |  |  | Randy S. Gottfried Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to Riverbed Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Riverbed Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to
which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 37TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on May 6, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or

reverse your judgment between

In the Interest of J.M.-H., Children, Appellant

V.

No. 04-15-00003-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2014-PA-00209

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the motion to dismiss

is GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED.

We order that no costs be assessed against appellant because he is

indigent.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on July 13, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-15-00003-CV

In the Interest of J.M.-H., Children

v.

(NO. 2014-PA-00209 IN 37TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this July 13, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40513 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
GEOVANI ALEXANDER VIALTA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14

- CR

- 963

- 1

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Geovani Alexander Vialta raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez , 711 F.3d 541, 562

- 63 & n.2 8 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), which h eld that the generic, contemporary definiti on of “sexual abuse o f a minor” does not require the age of consent to be below 17 years old and does not include the
asserte d age
- differential requirement. He also raises an argument that he

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 1 5 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40513 Document: 00513307976 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015No. 15

- 40513

2 concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Elizondo

- Hernandez , 755 F.3d 779,
781

- 82 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied , 135 S. Ct. 1011 (2015), which held that the Texas offense of indecency with a child by contact satisfied the generic definition of “sexual abuse of minor.” The motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 15-40513 Document: 00513307976 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sentry Petroleum Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Raj Rajeswaran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 6th day of October, 2009.

| |     |                                                           
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                           
| | BY: | RAJ RAJESWARANRaj Rajeswaran, 
Principal Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20754

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CLARENCE LEONARD PHILLIPS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 96-CR-47-2

- - - - - - - - - -

September 18, 1997

Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Clarence Leonard Phillips appeals his sentence in a guiltyplea conviction for conspiracy with intent to distribute a

mixture containing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (count

one) and aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute

a mixture containing cocaine in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 841(a)(1) (count two). He argues that the district court erred

in calculating the criminal history category and in declining to
No. 96-20754

-2-

sentence him below the statutory minimum under the safety-valve provision.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record and find no

error. The district court properly counted the deferred

adjudication as a prior sentence under the guidelines. See

United States v. Giraldo-Lara, 919 F.2d 19, 22 (5th Cir. 1990). 

The one-point assessment for the marijuana conviction was not

error because the marijuana and gambling convictions were not

“related” as defined by the guidelines. See United States v.

Velazquez-Overa, 100 F.3d 418, 423 (5th Cir. 1996); U.S.S.G. 

§ 4A1.2, comment. (n.3). Even if the two convictions had been

considered “related,” the criminal history category II would have

remained the same; therefore, any error would have been harmless. 

Because Phillips had more than one criminal history point, the

safety-valve provision did not apply. See

§ 5C1.2(1). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 of Blue Ridge Real Estate Company and Big Boulder Corporation (together , the Registrants) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick M. Flynn, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Registrants, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 78o(d); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.    /s/ Patrick M. Flynn Patrick M. Flynn Chief Executive Officer and President January 28, 2009