29436 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 118 / Monday, June 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules 

A. Redesignating paragraphs 

(e)(26)(ii)(B)(2), (3) and (4) as paragraphs 

(e)(26)(ii)(B)(3), (4) and (5); 

B. Adding a sentence to the end of the 

introductory text in paragraph 

(e)(26)(ii)(B); 

C. Revising paragraph 

(e)(26)(ii)(B)(1)(ii); 

D. Revising paragraph 

(e)(26)(ii)(B)(1)(iv); 

E. Adding new paragraph 

(e)(26)(ii)(B)(1)(v); and 

F. Adding a new paragraph 

(e)(26)(ii)(B)(2) to read as follows: 

§ 199.4 Basic program benefits. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

(26) * * * 

(ii) * * * 

(B) * * * Additionally, Phase I 

studies may be approved on a case by 

case basis when the requirements below 

are met. 

(1) * * * 

(ii) Such treatments are NCI 

sponsored Phase I, Phase II or Phase III 

protocols; and 

* * * * * 

(iv) The institutional and individual 

providers are CHAMPUS authorized 

providers; and, 

(v) The requirements for Phase I 

protocols in paragraph (e)(26)(ii)(B)(2) of 

this section are met: 

(2) Requirements for Phase I protocols 

are: 

(i) Standard treatment has been or 

would be ineffective, does not exist, or 

there is no superior non-investigational 

treatment alternative; and, 

(ii) The available clinical or 

preclinical data provide a reasonable 

expectation that the treatment will be at 

least as effective as the noninvestigational alternative; and, 

(iii) The facility and personnel 

providing the treatment are capable of 

doing so by virtue of their experience, 

training, and volume of patients treated 

to maintain expertise; and, 

(iv) The referring physician has 

concluded that the enrollee’s 

participation in such a trial would be 

appropriate based upon the satisfaction 

of paragraphs (e)(26)(ii)(B)(2)(i) through 

(e)(26)(ii)(B)(2)(iii) of this section. 

* * * * * 

Dated: May 15, 2009. 

Patricia Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. E9–14441 Filed 6–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 100 

[USCG–2009–0400] 

RIN 1625–AA08 

Regattas and Marine Parades; Great 

Lakes Annual Marine Events 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

amend special local regulations for 

annual regattas and marine parades in 

the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte 

Marie zone. This action is necessary to 

protect and separate the public from the 

hazards of these events. This proposed 

rule will establish restrictions upon, and 

control movement of, vessels in a 

specified area immediately prior to, 

during, and immediately after regattas 

or marine parades. 

DATES: Comments and related materials 

must reach the Coast Guard on or before 

July 22, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by Coast Guard docket 

number USCG–2009–0400 to the Docket 

Management Facility at the U.S. 

Department of Transportation. To avoid 

duplication, please use only one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Online: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(3) Hand delivery: Room W12–140 on 

the Ground Floor of the West Building, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The telephone 

number is 202–366–9329. 

(4) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

LCDR Christopher Friese, Prevention 

Dept. Chief, Sector Sault Sainte Marie, 

337 Water St., Sault Sainte Marie, MI 

49783; 906–635–3220. 

I. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted, 

without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation (DOT) 

to use the Docket Management Facility. 

Please see DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’ 

paragraph below. 

A. Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2009–0400), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and give the reason for each 

comment. We recommend that you 

include your name, mailing address, 

and an e-mail address or other contact 

information in the body of your 

document to ensure that you can be 

identified as the submitter. This also 

allows us to contact you in the event 

further information is needed or if there 

are questions. For example, if we cannot 

read your submission due to technical 

difficulties and you cannot be 

contacted; your submission may not be 

considered. You may submit your 

comments and material by electronic 

means, mail, fax, or delivery to the 

Docket Management Facility at the 

address under ADDRESSES; but please 

submit your comments and material by 

only one means. If you submit them by 

mail or delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit them by 

mail and would like to know that they 

reached the Facility, please enclose a 

stamped, self-addressed postcard or 

envelope. We will consider all 

comments and material received during 

the comment period. We may change 

this proposed rule in view of them. 

B. Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov at any time, 

click on ‘‘Search for Dockets,’’ and enter 

the docket number for this rulemaking 

(USCG–2008–XXXX) in the Docket ID 

box, and click enter. You may also visit 

the Docket Management Facility in 

Room W12–140 on the ground floor of 

the DOT West Building, 1200 New 

Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 

20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. 

C. Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of all comments received into any 

of our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review the 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 118 / Monday, June 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules 29437 

Department of Transportation’s Privacy 

Act Statement in the Federal Register 

published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 

19477), or you may visit http:// 

DocketsInfo.dot.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for a meeting by writing to Commander, 

Coast Guard Sector Sault Sainte Marie at 

the address under ADDRESSES explaining 

why one would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

Background and Purpose 

This proposed rule will add several 

regattas and marine parades not 

previously listed in 33 CFR Part 100. 

The specific events to be added are 

Copperhead Regatta, Houghton, MI, 

Spirit of the Lake Regatta, Superior, WI, 

Point to LaPoint Swim, LaPoint, WI, 

Duluth Rowing International Regatta, 

and Grand Marais Splash In, Grand 

Marais, MI. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

This proposed rule is intended to 

ensure safety of life on the navigable 

waters immediately prior to, during, and 

immediately after regattas or marine 

parades. This proposed rule will 

establish restrictions upon and control 

the movement of vessels through a 

specified area immediately prior to, 

during, and immediately after regattas 

or marine parades. 

The Captain of the Port will cause 

notice of enforcement of the special 

local regulations established by this 

section to be made by all appropriate 

means to the affected segments of the 

public. Such means of notification will 

include, but is not limited to, Broadcast 

Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to 

Mariners. The Captain of the Port will 

issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners 

notifying the public when enforcement 

of the special local regulations is 

terminated. 

Regulatory Evaluation 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, 

Regulatory Planning and Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office 

of Management and Budget has not 

reviewed it under that Order. 

We expect the economic impact of 

this proposed rule to be so minimal that 

a full Regulatory Evaluation is 

unnecessary. 

The Coast Guard’s use of these special 

local regulations will be periodic in 

nature, of short duration, and designed 

to minimize the impact on navigable 

waters. These special local regulations 

will only be enforced immediately 

before and during the time the marine 

events are occurring. Furthermore, these 

special local regulations have been 

designed to allow vessels to transit 

unrestricted to portions of the 

waterways not affected by the special 

local regulations. The Coast Guard 

expects insignificant adverse impact to 

mariners from the activation of these 

special local regulations. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. 

This proposed rule would affect the 

following entities, some of which might 

be small entities: The owners or 

operators of vessels intending to transit 

or anchor in the areas designated as 

special local regulations in this rule 

during the dates and times the special 

local regulations are being enforced. 

These special local regulations would 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

for the following reasons. The special 

local regulations in this proposed rule 

would be in effect for short periods of 

time, and only once per year. The 

special local regulations have been 

designed to allow traffic to pass safely 

around the zone whenever possible and 

vessels will be allowed to pass through 

the zones with the permission of the 

Captain of the Port. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this proposed rule would economically 

affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the proposed rule would affect your 

small business, organization, or 

governmental jurisdiction and you have 

questions concerning its provisions or 

options for compliance, please contact 

LCDR Christopher Friese, Prevention 

Dept. Chief, Sector Sault Sainte Marie, 

337 Water St., Sault Sainte Marie, MI 

49783; 906–635–3220. The Coast Guard 

will not retaliate against small entities 

that question or complain about this 

proposed rule or any policy or action of 

the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule calls for no new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 or more in any one year. 

Though this proposed rule will not 

result in such expenditure, we 

nevertheless discuss its effects 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule will not effect a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
29438 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 118 / Monday, June 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This proposed rule is not an 

economically significant rule and does 

not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

The Coast Guard recognizes the treaty 

rights of Native American Tribes. 

Moreover, the Coast Guard is committed 

to working with Tribal Governments to 

implement local policies and to mitigate 

tribal concerns. We have determined 

that these safety zones and fishing rights 

protection need not be incompatible. 

We have also determined that this 

proposed rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

Nevertheless, Indian Tribes that have 

questions concerning the provisions of 

this proposed rule or options for 

compliance are encouraged to contact 

the point of contact listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD and Department of 

Homeland Security Management 

Directive 023–01, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is not likely to have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. An environmental 

analysis checklist supporting this 

preliminary determination is available 

in the docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows: 

PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON 

NAVIGABLE WATERS 

1. The authority citation for Part 100 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233. 

2. Add § 100.921 to read as follows: 

§ 100.921 Copperhead Regatta, Houghton, 

MI. 

(a) Regulated Area. A regulated area is 

established to encompass all waters 

west of the boundary line created by 

points 47°06′48′′ N, 088°30′04′′ W and 

47°06′34′′ N, 088°30′48′′ W to the 

Houghton area lift Bridge (NAD 1983). 

(b) Special Local Regulations. The 

regulations of § 100.901 apply. No 

vessel may enter, transit through, or 

anchor within the regulated area 

without the permission of the Coast 

Guard Patrol Commander. 

(c) Effective date: The last Saturday in 

September. The exact dates and times 

for this event will be determined 

annually, and published through Local 

Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice 

to Mariners. 

3. Add § 100.922 to read as follows: 

§ 100.922 Spirit of the Lake Regatta, 

Superior, WI. 

(a) Regulated Area. A regulated area is 

established to encompass all waters 

within the Superior Front Channel 

bounded by a line starting at 46°42.47′ 

N, 092°02.42′ W then running northeast 

to position 46°42.52′ N, 092°02.36′ W 

then running northwest to position 

46°44.30′ N, 092°04.75′ W then running 

southwest to position 46°44.26′ N, 

092°05.03′ W then running southeast 

back to the starting point (NAD 1983). 

(b) Special Local Regulations. The 

regulations of § 100.901 apply. No 

vessel may enter, transit through, or 

anchor within the regulated area 

without the permission of the Coast 

Guard Patrol Commander. 

(c) Effective Date. This event occurs 

the second weekend in September. The 

exact dates and times for this event will 

be determined annually, and published 

through Local Notice to Mariners and 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

4. Add § 100.923 to read as follows: 

§ 100.923 Pointe to LaPointe Swim, 

LaPointe, WI. 

(a) Regulated Area. A regulated area is 

established to include all waters of Lake 

Superior extending 50 yards on both 

sides of a line starting at position 

46°48.50′ N, 090°48.41′ W then running 

southeast to position 46°47.12′ N, 

090°47.19′ W (NAD 1983). 

(b) Special Local Regulations. The 

regulations of § 100.901 apply. No 

vessel may enter, transit through, or 

anchor within the regulated area 

without the permission of the Coast 

Guard Patrol Commander. 

(c) Effective Date. This event occurs 

the second weekend in August. The 

exact dates and times for this event will 

be determined annually and published 

through Local Notice to Mariners and 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

5. Add § 100.924 to read as follows: 

§ 100.924 Duluth Rowing International 

Regatta. 

(a) Regulated Area. A regulated area is 

established to include all waters 

adjacent to Park Point in DuluthSuperior Harbor within the following 

boundaries beginning at latitude 

46°45′19.3′′ N, longitude 92°04′43′′ W; 

thence to latitude 46°45′11.7′′ N, 

longitude 92°05′01′′ W; thence to 

latitude 46°44′21.2′′ N, longitude 

92°04′15.7′′ W; thence to latitude 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 118 / Monday, June 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules 29439 

46°44′29.4′′ N, longitude 92°03′57.5′′ W; 

thence to the point of beginning (NAD 

1983). This area is also the Special 

Anchorage Area for Duluth-Superior 

Harbor as designated in 33 CFR 

§ 110.77a. 

(b) Special Local Regulations. The 

regulations of § 100.901 apply. No 

vessel may enter, transit through, or 

anchor within the regulated area 

without the permission of the Coast 

Guard Patrol Commander. 

(c) Effective Date. This event occurs 

the second weekend in July. The exact 

dates and times for this event will be 

determined annually and published 

through Local Notice to Mariners and 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

6. Add § 100.925 to read as follows: 

§ 100.925 Grand Marais Splash In, Grand 

Marais, MI. 

(a) Regulated Area. A regulated area is 

established to include all waters of Lake 

Superior within a 1500-foot radius of 

position 46°40.37′ N, 085°58.74′ W 

(NAD 1983). 

(b) Special Local Regulations. The 

regulations of § 100.901 apply. No 

vessel may enter, transit through, or 

anchor within the regulated area 

without the permission of the Coast 

Guard Patrol Commander. 

(c) Effective Date. This event occurs 

the third week in June. The exact dates 

and times for this event will be 

determined annually and published 

through Local Notice to Mariners and 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

Dated: June 8, 2009. 

M.J. Huebschman, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Sault Sainte Marie. 

[FR Doc. E9–14552 Filed 6–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 146 

[Docket Number USCG–2008–1088] 

RIN 1625–AB28 

Notice of Arrival on the Outer 

Continental Shelf 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

enhance maritime domain safety and 

security awareness on units and 

personnel engaging in activities on the 

Outer Continental Shelf by proposing 

regulations which will require notice of 

arrival for units planning to engage in 

Outer Continental Shelf activities. The 

proposed rules would implement 

provisions of the Security and 

Accountability for Every Port Act of 

2006 and increase overall maritime 

domain awareness by requiring owners 

or operators of United States and foreign 

flag floating facilities, mobile offshore 

drilling units, and vessels to submit 

notice of arrival information to the 

National Vessel Movement Center prior 

to engaging in Outer Continental Shelf 

activities. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must either be submitted to our online 

docket via http://www.regulations.gov 

on or before September 21, 2009 or 

reach the Docket Management Facility 

by that date. 

Comments sent to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) on 

collection of information must reach 

OMB on or before September 21, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by Coast Guard docket 

number USCG–2008–1088 using any 

one of the following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal 

http://www.regulations.gov; 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these methods. For instructions 

on submitting comments, see the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

Collection of Information Comments: 

If you have comments on the collection 

of information discussed in section V.D. 

of this notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM), you must also send comments 

to the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of 

Management and Budget. To ensure that 

your comments to OIRA are received on 

time, the preferred methods are by email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov 

(include the docket number and 

‘‘Attention: Desk Officer for Coast 

Guard, DHS’’ in the subject line of the 

e-mail) or fax at 202–395–6566. An 

alternate, though slower, method is by 

U.S. mail to the Office of Information 

and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 

Management and Budget, 725 17th 

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, 

ATTN: Desk Officer, U.S. Coast Guard. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or e-mail Mr. James M. Magill, 

Vessel and Facility Operating Standards 

Division (CG–5222), Coast Guard; 

telephone 202–372–1414, e-mail 

James.M.Magill@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Ms. Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents for Preamble 

I. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

A. Submitting Comments 

B. Viewing Comments and Documents 

C. Privacy Act 

D. Public Meeting 

II. Abbreviations 

III. Background 

IV. Discussion of Proposed Rule 

V. Regulatory Analyses 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

B. Small Entities 

C. Assistance for Small Entities 

D. Collection of Information 

E. Federalism 

F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

G. Taking of Private Property 

H. Civil Justice Reform 

I. Protection of Children 

J. Indian Tribal Governments 

K. Energy Effects 

L. Technical Standards 

M. Environment 

I. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted, 

without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

A. Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2008–1088), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online or by fax, mail, or hand 

delivery, but please use only one of 

these means. We recommend that you 

include your name and a mailing 

address, an e-mail address, or a phone 

number in the body of your document 

so that we can contact you if we have 

questions regarding your submission. 

To submit your comments online, go 

to http://www.regulations.gov, select the 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS