alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Certification Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Era Marketing, Inc. (“New Era”) on Form 10-QSB for the three-month period and six month period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph MacKenzie, President and Chief Executive Officer of New Era, and I, Joseph MacKenzie, Principal Financial Officer of New Era, certify, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of New Era. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: November 20, 2006

 

/s/ Joseph MacKenzie

Joseph MacKenzie

President and Chief Executive Officer 

 

Date: November 20, 2006

 

/s/ Joseph MacKenzie

Joseph MacKenzie

Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 33-13278, 33-27498, 33-45699, 33-58340, 33-50395, 33-51615,
33-65301, 333-08549, 333-15089, 333-15089-01 through -04, 333-32909, Form S-4
Nos. 333-22733, 333-22733-01, 333-31061 and Form S-8 Nos. 2-67517, 2-97972,
33-20693, 33-21564, 33-41014, 33-52329, 33-54971, 333-12181, 333-19963,
333-31061, 333-34371, 333-43959 and 333-57427) of our report dated January 21,
1999, (except for Note 28, as to which the date is March 12, 1999), with respect
to the consolidated balance sheet of Bankers Trust Corporation and Subsidiaries
at December 31, 1998 and December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, comprehensive income and
cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1998,
which report appears in the December 31, 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Bankers Trust Corporation. Such report also makes reference to our audit of the
combination of Bankers Trust Corporation and Alex. Brown Incorporated as
reflected in the combined restated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 1996.


                                                      /S/ KPMG LLP
                                                          ------------
                                                          KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 19, 1999


126  Bankers Trust Corporation and its Subsidiaries
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3481 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify Federal 

responsibility for stormwater pollution. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2010 

Mr. CARDIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify 

Federal responsibility for stormwater pollution. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR STORMWATER 

4 POLLUTION. 

5 Section 313 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

6 Act (33 U.S.C. 1323) is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following: 

8 ‘‘(c) FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR STORMWATER

9 POLLUTION.—Reasonable service charges described in 

10 subsection (a) include reasonable fees or assessments 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3481 IS

1 made for the purpose of stormwater management in the 

2 same manner and to the same extent as any nongovern3 mental entity. 

4 ‘‘(d) NO TREATMENT AS TAX OR LEVY.—A fee or 

5 assessment described in this section— 

6 ‘‘(1) shall not be considered to be a tax or other 

7 levy subject to an assertion of sovereign immunity; 

8 and 

9 ‘‘(2) may be paid using appropriated funds.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
ACCEPTED

04-15-00155-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

7/13/2015 11:24:05 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 07/13/2015 11:24:05 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
T \/\A_ ~ rL ri ¥( ~ vtG. f:_s ~ 1 fg_ ~ \/\. a -'1. U J' ~:If~OS!~ c:;_r~'< i_ k 

a he u t£ ~--u [' CL .-- tL v\_ Let:. j_ C cL s.. tL · Lt....du -lL. , · L l:_S. !~Hi:. c;_ V\.. ~ tL- ../:._ 

o -'\___ L ~ . d ~ G \(a- \:_ f-' a -r e r a. ( A ;,- b.'-' vv-Jl ~ i:::s. o r LL..) ~ --lW r 

[_ t_ ~ htL &__ ""-- {._ .J (;\_ V'. 6.. cl r A l/'v. '{ V ~ b tJ;;J {_ V\ F /1) \) v'-"..-0\ l: .:- (9- ""'-

Lu :.. \.\ ~ ({, a. .f P r G. c; ~ tt !::.u. a . l h.o: ..-(_ k' ~ ~ ~ r Y 6- <.:-- r d ; l ; -

C- "- ...., c. t to. ~ :- i. 1/\./Vo.. ·tJ::L r _
[982 NE2d 614, 958 NYS2d 694]

#### Michel D. Tyson, Appellant, v Lawrence Nazarian, Respondent.

Decided December 18, 2012

*968APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Davison Law Office, PLLC,*Canandaigua *(Mark C. Davison*of counsel), for appellant.

*Burgio, Kita & Curvin,*Buffalo *(Hilary C. Banker*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment and remitting to the Appellate Division for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum, and, as so modified, affirmed.

Sufficient record evidence exists to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether plaintiff suffered a “serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 957 [1992]). In view of its disposition, the Appellate Division did not address plaintiff’s contention that she is entitled to summary judgment on the issue of defendant’s negligence. We therefore remit for that purpose.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order modified, without costs, by denying defendant’s motion for summary *969judgment and remitting to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.
#     Events  

BRAIN Multi-Council Working Group (MCWG) Meeting

BRAIN Neuroethics Working Group (NEWG) Meeting

Post Event Summary
ME/CFS Research Roadmap Webinar Series: Nervous System

August 2023 Council - Closed Session

 Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies® (BRAIN) Workshop on Patient Recruitment in DBS Clinical Trials

Post Event Summary
OPEN Stage Webinar: Enhancing the Value of Research Findings - Activities at NINDS and Beyond

NINDS Fundamental Neuroscience Working Group Public Webinar

Understanding and Restoring Whole Joint Health in Pain Management: An NIH HEAL Initiative Workshop

2023 NINDS Nonprofit Forum

Post Event Summary
NINDS & NIMH Advancing Diversity R25 Technical Assistance Webinar

#### Pagination

-  « FirstFirst page 
-  ‹‹Previous page 
-  4 
-  5 
-  6 
-  7 
-  8 
-  9 
-  10 
-  ››Next page 
-  Last »Last page 

    CSV  

    JSON  

    XLSX  

        RSS
Exhibit 23



                         CONSENT of Independent Auditors

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  following  Registration
Statements  of The Black & Decker  Corporation  of our report dated  January 27,
2000, with respect to the consolidated  financial statements and schedule of The
Black & Decker  Corporation  included in the Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1999.


Registration Statement Number                     Description

33-6610                                              Form S-8
33-6612                                              Form S-8
33-26917                                             Form S-8
33-26918                                             Form S-8
33-33251                                             Form S-8
33-39608                                             Form S-3
33-47651                                             Form S-8
33-47652                                             Form S-8
33-53807                                             Form S-3
33-58795                                             Form S-8
33-65013                                             Form S-8
333-03593                                            Form S-8
333-03595                                            Form S-8
333-51155                                            Form S-8
333-51157                                            Form S-8



/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
February 8, 2000
LARRY L. WILLIAMS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 0811

______ _______________________/

Opinion filed June 21, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Marianne L. Aho , Judge

.

Larry L. Williams, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attor ney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
***NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION***

***MICS CLASS II - AUDIT CHECKLIST***

***COMPLIMENTARY SERVICES OR ITEMS (CS)***

Page 2 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2201

JOHNNY D. RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PETE GEREN, Secretary of the Army, Department of the Army,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:08-cv-03121-CCB)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 19, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny D. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Johnny D. Richardson appeals the district court’s 

order granting the Appellee’s motion to dismiss Richardson’s 

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Richardson v. Geren, No. 1:08-cv-03121-CCB (D. 

Md. May 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Eldon D. Dietterick, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 of Blue Ridge Real Estate Company and Big Boulder Corporation (together , the Registrants);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants boards of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: February 14, 2006



/s/ Eldon D. Dietterick

Eldon D. Dietterick

Executive Vice President

and Treasurer
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

AGUSTIN ENCARNACION

- CAMPOS,
Claimant

- Appellant

v.

ROBERT WILKIE, SECRE TARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2018

- 2313

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in No. 17

- 968, Judge William S. Greenberg.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K ENNETH M. C ARPENTER , Law Offices of Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant

- appellant.

D AVID P EHLKE , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent

- appellee. Also represented by J OSEPH H. H UNT

, C LAUDIA B URKE

, R OBERT E DWARD K IRSCHMAN

, J R

. ; M ARTIE A DELMAN

, B RIAN D. G RIFFIN

,Office of General Counsel, United States Department of
Veterans Affairs , Washington, DC

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, Chief Judge, P LAGER and
S TOLL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 6, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             123
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                        20
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,306
<PP&E>                                           6,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,068
<BONDS>                                          7,277
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,560)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,326
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,517
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    23
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    317
<INCOME-TAX>                                        38
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                279
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       279
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        


</TABLE>
#### Rocky Point Drive-In, L.P, Appellant, v Town of Brookhaven et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 20, 2012;

decided October 25, 2012

Motion by Long Island Builders Institute, Inc. for leave to appear amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed affirmation is accepted as filed, and for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that three copies of a brief may be served and 19 copies filed within 30 days.
# NIMH Pages About Panic Disorder

Find current clinical trials on Panic Disorder...

----

### Latest Video and Audio About Panic Disorder

Panic Disorder: The Symptoms
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hector Santiago, Appellant.

Submitted September 10, 2012;

decided September 13, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., The Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 1396 V

UNPUBLISHED

MICHELE MULLOY

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: May 5, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Leah V

. Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC , for petitioner.

Lynn Christina Schlie , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On September 12, 20 19

, Michele Mulloy filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) resulting from adverse effects of an influenza (flu ) vaccination she

received on October 31, 201 8 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 22, 2021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that

P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Res pondent found that “ [P] etitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”).

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required
to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government
Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

(2012 ).2

That is, [P] etitioner had no relevant history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction in her
right shoulder; her pain and reduced range of motion occurred within 48 hours of receipt

of an intramuscular vaccination; her symptoms were limited to the shoulder in which the

vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality was identified to explain
her symptoms. ” Id. at 10

. Respondent further agrees that the scope of damages to be

award ed is li mited to Pet itioner ’ s left

- sided SIRVA and its related sequelae only

. Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
##### 



Exhibit 12.2
 Pinnacle West Capital Corporation
Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges
($000s)
 2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Earnings:Income From Continuing Operations
    
    $
    298,780
    
    
    $
    317,143
    
    
    $
    223,163
    
    
    $
    246,590
    
    
    $
    225,384
    
    
    $
    236,563Income Taxes
    
    
    150,920
    
    
    
    156,418
    
    
    
    126,892
    
    
    
    136,142
    
    
    
    102,202
    
    
    
    152,145Fixed Charges
    
    
    239,804
    
    
    
    225,119
    
    
    
    214,430
    
    
    
    214,803
    
    
    
    225,041
    
    
    
    219,178Total Earnings
    
    $
    689,504
    
    
    $
    698,680
    
    
    $
    564,485
    
    
    $
    597,535
    
    
    $
    552,627
    
    
    $
    607,886Fixed Charges:Interest Expense
    
    $
    212,620
    
    
    $
    196,826
    
    
    $
    185,087
    
    
    $
    183,527
    
    
    $
    193,973
    
    
    $
    187,039Estimated Interest Portion of Annual Rents
    
    
    27,184
    
    
    
    28,293
    
    
    
    29,343
    
    
    
    31,276
    
    
    
    31,068
    
    
    
    32,139Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    239,804
    
    
    $
    225,119
    
    
    $
    214,430
    
    
    $
    214,803
    
    
    $
    225,041
    
    
    $
    219,178Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (rounded down)
    
    
    2.87
    
    
    
    3.10
    
    
    
    2.63
    
    
    
    2.78
    
    
    
    2.45
    
    
    
    2.77