29478 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 118 / Monday, June 22, 2009 / Notices 

Please cite OMB Control No. 9000–0079, 

Corporate Aircraft Costs, in all 

correspondence. 

Dated: June 16, 2009. 

Al Matera, 

Director, Office of Acquisition Policy. 

[FR Doc. E9–14534 Filed 6–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

Reserve Forces Policy Board (RFPB) 

AGENCY: Department of Defense; Office 

of the Secretary of Defense Reserve 

Forces Policy Board. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act of 

1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), 

the Government in the Sunshine Act of 

1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 

41 CFR 102–3.150, the Department of 

Defense announces that the following 

Federal advisory committee meeting of 

the Reserve Forces Policy Board (RFPB) 

will take place. 

Due to scheduling difficulties the 

Reserve Forces Policy Board was unable 

to finalize its agenda in time to publish 

notice of its meeting in the Federal 

Register for the 15-calendar days 

required by 41 CFR 102–3.150(a). 

Accordingly, the Committee 

Management Officer for the Department 

of Defense, pursuant to 41 CFR 102– 

3.150(b), waives the 15-calendar day 

notification requirement. 

DATES: June 24, 2009 from 8 a.m.–4 p.m. 

and June 25, 2009 from 8:30 a.m.–3 p.m. 

ADDRESSES: Meeting address is the 

Pentagon, Conference Room 3E863, 

Arlington, VA. Mailing address is 

Reserve Forces Policy Board, 7300 

Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 

20301–7300. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Col. 

Marjorie Davis, Designated Federal 

Officer, (703) 697–4486 (Voice), (703) 

614–0504 (Facsimile), 

marjorie.davis@osd.mil. Mailing address 

is Reserve Forces Policy Board, 7300 

Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 

20301–7300. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Purpose of the Meeting: A quarterly 

meeting of the Reserve Forces Policy 

Board. 

Agenda: Discussion of readiness and 

other issues relevant to the Reserve 

Components. 

Public’s Accessibility to the Meeting: 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)1, as 

amended, the meeting will be closed. 

Written Statements: Pursuant to 41 

CFR 102–3.105(j) and 102–3.140, the 

public or interested organizations may 

submit written statements to the 

membership of the Reserve Forces 

Policy Board at any time or in response 

to the stated agenda of a planned 

meeting. Written statements should be 

submitted to the Reserve Forces Policy 

Board’s Designated Federal Officer. The 

Designated Federal Officer’s contact 

information can be obtained from the 

GSA’s FACA Database—https:// 

www.fido.gov/facadatabase/public.asp. 

Written statements that do not pertain 

to a scheduled meeting of the Reserve 

Forces Policy Board may be submitted 

at any time. However, if individual 

comments pertain to a specific topic 

being discussed at a planned meeting 

then these statements must be submitted 

within five business days of the meeting 

in question. The Designated Federal 

Officer will review all submitted written 

statements and provide copies to all the 

committee members. 

Dated: June 12, 2009. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. E9–14488 Filed 6–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

SUMMARY: The Director, Information 

Collection Clearance Division, 

Regulatory Information Management 

Services, Office of Management invites 

comments on the submission for OMB 

review as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before July 22, 

2009. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments should 

be addressed to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention: Education Desk Officer, 

Office of Management and Budget, 725 

17th Street, NW., Room 10222, New 

Executive Office Building, Washington, 

DC 20503, be faxed to (202) 395–5806 or 

send e-mail to 

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) provide interested 

Federal agencies and the public an early 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection requests. OMB may amend or 

waive the requirement for public 

consultation to the extent that public 

participation in the approval process 

would defeat the purpose of the 

information collection, violate State or 

Federal law, or substantially interfere 

with any agency’s ability to perform its 

statutory obligations. The Director, 

Regulatory Information Management 

Services, Office of Management, 

publishes that notice containing 

proposed information collection 

requests prior to submission of these 

requests to OMB. Each proposed 

information collection, grouped by 

office, contains the following: (1) Type 

of review requested, e.g., new, revision, 

extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) 

Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4) 

Description of the need for, and 

proposed use of, the information; (5) 

Respondents and frequency of 

collection; and (6) Reporting and/or 

Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites 

public comment. 

Dated: June 16, 2009. 

Angela C. Arrington, 

Director, Information Clearance Collection 

Division, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of Management. 

Office of Planning, Evaluation and 

Policy Development 

Type of Review: New. 

Title: Evaluation of State and Local 

Implementation of Title III Standards, 

Assessments, and Accountability 

Systems. 

Frequency: One time. 

Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal 

Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs. 

Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour 

Burden: 

Responses: 1,940. 

Burden Hours: 1,600. 

Abstract: The study will serve to 

update state-level information about 

Title III implementation and will also 

provide an important opportunity to go 

beyond the mechanics of 

implementation to answer a series of 

key evaluation questions that will 

deepen understanding of the extent to 

which Title III is achieving its 

underlying goals. The study has four 

interrelated objectives: (1) To describe 

the progress in implementation of Title 

III provisions, and variation in 

implementation across states; (2) To 

examine how localities are 

implementing their programs for limited 

English proficient (LEP) students and 

how these relate to state policies and 

contexts; (3) To determine how LEP 

students are faring in the development 

of their English language proficiency 

(ELP) and mastery of academic content; 

and (4) To maintain a focus on the 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES