alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          542636
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   609602
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2570053
<PP&E>                                        20685099
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                24843708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2561411
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    22002670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  24843708
<SALES>                                         199080
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                503498
<CGS>                                           160325
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   160325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                130698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 212475
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             212475
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    212475
<EPS-BASIC>                                       7.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.13


</TABLE>
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 CECILE FOY GSANGER

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

July 14, 2015

Hon. Stephen B. Tyler

District Attorney

205 N. Bridge St., Suite 301

Victoria, TX 77901

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Daniel Gilliam

County Court at Law No. 2

115 N. Bridge, Room 127

Victoria, TX 77901

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Brendan W. Guy

Assistant District Attorney

205 N. Bridge Street, Ste 301

Victoria, TX 77901

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Patti Hutson

Attorney at Law

110 E. Constitution

Victoria, TX 77901

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-15-00317-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 2-103177

Style: In Re The State of Texas ex. rel. Stephen B. Tyler

Enclosed please find a copy of an amended order issued by this Court on this 

date.

Very truly yours,

Cecile Foy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. Heidi Easley (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 10, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01266-CV

TRI-STAR DIVERSIFIED, INC., Appellant

V.

MICHAEL ARNOLD & ARNOLD STONE, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-13679

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill

Opinion by Justice Whitehill

The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated January 5, 2015, we informed 

appellant that the Dallas County District Clerk notified the Court that the clerk’s record had not 

been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. 

We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s 

record. We cautioned appellant that if the required documentation was not filed within ten days, 

we might dismiss the appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not provided the 

required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the 

clerk’s record.
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

141266F.P05

/Bill Whitehill/

BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

TRI-STAR DIVERSIFIED, INC., Appellant

No. 05-14-01266-CV V.

MICHAEL ARNOLD & ARNOLD 

STONE, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-13679.

Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. 

Justices Francis and Lang-Miers 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellees MICHAEL ARNOLD & ARNOLD STONE, INC. 

recover their costs of this appeal from appellant TRI-STAR DIVERSIFIED, INC.

Judgment entered this 10th day of July, 2015.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K for Basic Earth Science Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer and its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuers last quarter of the current fiscal year that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and
the Audit Committee of the small business issuers Board of Directors:
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers
ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Joseph YoungJoseph YoungPrincipal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



--------------------------------------------------------------------



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Holdings Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Demitro Marianovich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|Registrant
Date:  November 3, 2010 | Gold Holdings Corporation
By: /s/ Demitro Marianovich                             
|---------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                   |                                                                                   
|                                   | Demitro Marianovich                                                               
|                                   | Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer, Principle Financial Officer)



26



|
|
#### Michael N. Victor, Jr., Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 663]

*524Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Shulman, J.), entered April 5, 2012, awarding plaintiff, after a jury verdict, the principal amounts of $400,000 for past pain and suffering and $450,000 for future pain and suffering over six years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The jury’s determination finding defendant liable and plaintiff’s decedent free from culpable conduct was neither legally insufficient *(see Szczerbiak v Pilat,*90 NY2d 553 [1997]) nor against the weight of evidence *(Cerasuoli v Brevetti,*166 AD2d 403, 404 [2d Dept 1990]). Decedent’s testimony that the doors suddenly closed on her while the train conductor was making announcements concerning whether the train would be proceeding local or express was unrebutted. Defendant’s conductor, who did not testify at trial, testified at her deposition that such an action would be improper, and that a conductor should finish such an announcement, closing the door a safe time thereafter.

Decedent suffered a fractured hip requiring surgery, and she testified that it changed her lifestyle, as she was no longer able to regularly travel into Manhattan to visit museums and attend cultural events and lectures. Thus, the jury’s award for future pain and suffering was not excessive. Furthermore, the jury’s award for past pain and suffering does not deviate materially from what would constitute reasonable compensation under the circumstances *(see e.g. Luna v New York City Tr. Auth.,*111 AD3d 551 [1st Dept 2013]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.
@misc{1150776,
  author = {John Barton and Tina G Butcher and Linda D Crown and Richard A Harshman and G Diane Lee},
  title = {Specifications, tolerances, and other technical requirements for weighing and measuring devices:},
  year = {2018},
  month = {2018-11-01 04:11:00},
  publisher = {, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.HB.44-2019},
  language = {en},
}
**Exhibit
      32**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) of Sterling
      Banks, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission, we, Robert H King, President and Chief Executive Officer, and R.
      Scott Horner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
                Robert H. King
            /s/
                R. Scott HornerRobert
                H. King
            R.
                Scott HornerPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
            Executive
                Vice President and Chief Financial
                Officer








Date:
      August 14, 2007
No. 12-15-00073-CR

YAGO FOUNTAIN § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

 Appellant §

§

vs. § 12TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee

§

§ AT TYLER, TEXAS

APPELLANT’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

BRIEF -- THREE DAY REQUEST

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Now comes Austin Reeve Jackson, counsel for Appellant in the above entitled and 

numbered cause, and makes this Motion, and for good cause shows the following:

I.

Appellant’s brief in this matter is due on 15 July 2015. One prior extension has

been requested.

II.

While working on this case counsel has also been working on approximately 55

open appellate cases in this and other courts to which he has been appointed by Smith 

County. This has included investigating motions for new trials (looking for and talking 

with potential witnesses, jail and office visits with new appellate appointments, trial court 

appearances for the same), requests for and reviews of reporter’s and clerk’s records, 

research, briefing, review of opinions, investigation of potential PDR issues, etc. While 

not all of these cases have required significant attention from counsel during this time, 

ACCEPTED

12-15-00073-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/15/2015 9:47:25 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/15/2015 9:47:25 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
many of them have which has resulted in counsel having been unable to devote the full 

attention necessary to this case prior to today’s date. 

II.

One prior extension has been requested and it is respectfully prayed that the in the 

interest of justice, the Court grant this motion.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, undersigned counsel respectfully 

prays that, in accordance with the applicable law, the Court grant this Motion and extend 

the date by which to file a brief by three days. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Austin Reeve Jackson

Texas Bar No. 24046139

112 East Line, Suite 310

Tyler, TX 75702

Telephone: (903) 595-6070

Facsimile: (866) 387-0152

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document 

was served on counsel for the State by efile concurrently with its filing. 

/s/Austin Reeve Jackson
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------



                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathon M. Singer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

 i.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                    /s/  Jonathon M. Singer
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Jonathon M. Singer
                                    Chief Financial Officer



February 8, 2010
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D 23- 1770 LT Case No. 2020

- DR

- 2196

_____________________________ A DEL A B DALLA , A ppellant,

v. M AHA A BDALLA , A ppellee.

_____________________________ O n appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County
. Michael J. Rudisi ll , Judge
. G ary S. Israel , of Gary I srael, P.A. , Orlando , for Appellant. B randon M. Tyson , of Tyson Law Firm, LLC, Winter Park , for Appellee. March 5, 2024
P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . W ALLIS , L AMBERT , and E ISNAUGLE , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ N ot final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
** **

** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Good Times Restaurants Inc. (the "Company") for the periodended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, Boyd E. Hoback, as Chief Executive Officerof the Company, and Susan M. Knutson, as Controller of the Company, each herebycertifies, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge and belief:

(1)        TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)        Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ Boyd E. Hoback      | /s/ Susan M. Knutson                     |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                          |
| Boyd E. Hoback          | Susan M. Knutson                         |
| Chief Executive Officer | Controller (principal financial officer) |
| May 15, 2009            | May 15, 2009                             |

----
GoFO [(fH EASTERLING LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

,t~)OO Woodway, Suite 750

({ouston, Texas 77056

DANIEL O. GOFORTH

July 15,2015

VIA ELECTRONIC SERVICE

Mr. Christopher A. Prine

CLERK, FOURTEENTH COURT OF ApPEALS

301 Fannin, Suite 245

Houston, Texas 77002

TEI.FI'! lONE: (713) 650-0022

FACSIMII.E (713) 650-1669

da n co fort hflt) i!O fon h law .co III

RE: Appellate Cause No. 14-13-00694-CV; First Bank vs. DTSG, Ltd., et at.; In the

Court of Appeals for the Fomteenth District ofTexas.

Dear Mr. Prine,

Appellant First Bank filed a motion for rehearing in this case on July 7, 2015. Please be

advised that Appellee DTSG, Ltd. will waive its right to file a response to the motion at this

time. Under Rule 49.2, I understand that the Court will not grant the motion without first

requesting a response. I would appreciate it if you would direct this letter to the attention of the

Court.

Thank you for your cooperation.

cc: Donald L. Turbyfill

David T. Moran

Richard A. Sheehy

Michael A. Moriarty

Via/ax (713) 586-7053

Via/ax (214) 953-5822

Via/ax (713) 951-1199

Via/ax (713) 953-5822

ACCEPTED

14-13-00694-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/15/2015 2:28:14 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/15/2015 2:28:14 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,921]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 15, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by the State Workforce Office on behalf of workers at Newport Corporation, Irvine, California.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of May 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-15220 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1683** 

STEPHEN G. STERNER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK; BRYAN ABRAHAM, Woodforest National Bank Representative; LISA COTTON, Woodforest National Bank Ex. Vice President , Defendants

- Appellees
.

**No. 14**  **- 1684** 

STEPHEN GEORGE STERNER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK; WOODFOREST BANK , Defendants

- Appellees.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville
. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00229

- MR

- DLH; 1:14

- cv - 00092

- MR

- DLH )

Submitted : October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Stephen G. Sterner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Stephen G. Sterner challenges the district court ’ s order s denying his motion to amend his complaint in the action underlying Appeal No. 14

- 1684, and denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s orders : (1) dismissing the actions underlying both appeals ; and (2) denying his motion to amend . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sterner v. Woodforest Nat’l Bank , No s . 1:13

- cv - 00229

- MR

- DLH, 1:14

- cv - 00092

- MR

- DLH ( W. D. N.C. June 17, 2014; July 3, 2014)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRME D