alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**SECTION 1350      CERTIFICATIONS**

| Dated: | August                13, 2007 |
|--------|--------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                   |   |
|   |   |                                                   |   |
|   |   | /s/ F. Jacob                Cherian          |   |
|   |   | F. Jacob                  Cherian                 |   |
|   |   | President                  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   | (Principal                  Executive Officer)    |   |

|   |   |                                                                                                         |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                         |   |
|   |   | /s/ Suhel                Kanuga                                                                         |   |
|   |   | Suhel                  Kanuga                                                                                |   |
|   |   | Executive                  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and                  Secretary |   |
|   |   | (Principal                  Financial Officer)                                                          |   |

----
**Exhibit
      99.2**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Quarterly Report”) on the Form 10-QSB
      of Loma Verde Inc. (the “Loma”) for the six months ended December 31, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Peter
      Hill, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Loma.














PETER
      HILL


Peter
      Hill


Chief
      Executive Officer,


President
      and Director








-1-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          98,137
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          30,572
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                45,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    669,772
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         542,312
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           537,502
<LOANS>                                      2,830,073
<ALLOWANCE>                                     35,965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,357,170
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,337,055
<SHORT-TERM>                                   366,854
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             70,761
<LONG-TERM>                                    194,390
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           256
<OTHER-SE>                                     387,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               4,357,170
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                229,639
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,493
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                55,124
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               296,256
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             139,433
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             171,510
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          124,746
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 969
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                117,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,683
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      26,257
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,257
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.07
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,836
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,699
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 61,420
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                38,619
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,113
<RECOVERIES>                                       709
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               35,965
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            35,965
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quartely Report of Ivecon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jay D. Solomon, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/Jay D. Solomon

--------------------------------

JAY D. SOLOMON

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

World Energy Solutions, Inc.



May 14, 2007
#### George Robert HUFF; Maria Huff; V.R.H., by and through his Guardian Ad Litem George Robert Huff, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF BURBANK, a municipal corporation; Darin Ryburn, as an individual and in his official capacity; Edmundo Zepeda, as an individual and in his official capacity; Chris Robarts, as an individual and in his official capacity; Fernando Munoz, as an individual and in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-55239.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 19, 2012.

Leo James Terrell, Law Office of Leo James Terrell, Beverly Hills, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Calvin House, Gutierrez, Preciado & House, LLP, Pasadena, CA, Carol Ann *931Humiston, Esquire, Senior Litigating, Office of the City Attorney, Burbank, CA, Richard Terzian, Esquire, Robert John Tyson, Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Circuit Judge, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge, and ALGENON L. MARBLEY, United States District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Algenon L. Marbley, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

ORDER

We remand to the district court to comply with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in *Ryburn v. Huff,*— U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 987, 181 L.Ed.2d 966 (2012).

The mandate shall issue forthwith. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b).
#### Atlas Refrigeration-Air Conditioning, Inc., Respondent, v Salvatore Lo Pinto, Jr., Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 900]

In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, to recover damages for breach of contract, and to recover in quantum meruit for services rendered, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated November 4, 2004, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $120,000, with interest from June 30, 1997, in the sum of $75,150, plus costs and disbursements in the sum of $1,280, for the total sum of $196,430.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, by deleting from the first decretal paragraph thereof the words “with interest from June 30, 1997, in the amount of $75,150.00” and “making a total of $196,430.00,” and substituting therefor the words “with interest from October 15, 1999,” as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the respondent, and the matter is remitted *640to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the recalculation of prejudgment interest in accordance herewith and for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment accordingly.

In order to establish a claim in quantum meruit, a claimant must establish (1) the performance of the services in good faith, (2) the acceptance of the services by the person to whom they were rendered, (3) an expectation of compensation therefor, and (4) the reasonable value of the services *(see Ross v DeLorenzo,*28 AD3d 631 [2006]; *Tesser v Allboro Equip. Co.,*302 AD2d 589, 590 [2003]; *Matter of Alu,*302 AD2d 520 [2003]; *Geraldi v Melamid,*212 AD2d 575, 576 [1995]; *Moors v Hall,*143 AD2d 336, 337-338 [1988]; *Umscheid v Simnacher,*106 AD2d 380, 382-383 [1984]). Here, the plaintiff adduced evidence at trial to establish all four elements.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs application, made after it rested, to reopen its prima facie case to present specific evidence *(see*CPLR 4011; *Morgan v Pascal,*274 AD2d 561 [2000]; *Lagana v French,*145 AD2d 541, 542 [1988]).

The Supreme Court further properly dismissed the defendant’s counterclaim alleging willful exaggeration of a mechanic’s lien. The mechanic’s lien in this case was declared null and void by the Supreme Court because it had not been timely filed pursuant to Lien Law § 10. “The Legislature intended the remedy in Lien Law § 39-a to be available only where the lien was valid in all other respects and was declared void by reason of willful exaggeration after a trial of the foreclosure action” *(Guzman v Estate of Fluker,*226 AD2d 676, 678 [1996]).

However, the Supreme Court should have awarded prejudgment interest from October 15, 1999, the date of the plaintiffs demand for payment, which was “the earliest ascertainable date the cause of action existed” (CPLR 5001 [b]; *see Romito v Panzarino,*11 AD3d 444 [2004]; *Bowne & Co. v Scileppi,*99 AD2d 440, 441 [1984]). Schmidt, J.R, Santucci, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
@article{1206551,
  author = {Jeffrey Ethier and Debra Audus and Devin Ryan and Richard Vaia},
  title = {Integrating theory with machine learning for predicting polymer solution phase behavior},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-05-31 04:05:00},
  publisher = {Giant},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936130},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giant.2023.100171},
  language = {en},
}
No. 4965.

(Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.)

#### EMILE VALDEJO vs. FREDERICK ZIEGLER.

J. Zaeh Spearing for plaintiff and appellee.

Hy. G. Stewart for defendant and appellant.

ST. PAUL, J.

Plaintiff brought suit on a promissory note for $250.00, and claimed interest, costs and 10% attorney’s fees. Defendant answered admitting liability for the face of the note, but denying any liability for *320interest, costs or attorney’s fees, and he prayed that plaintiff’s suit be dismissed. The Court a qua gave judgment for plaintiff as prayed for, and defendant appeals.

April 4, 1910.

Notwithstanding that defendant prayed that the suit be dismissed, we are of opinion that his confession of liability for the face of the note left as the sole “matter in dispute” between the parties only interest, costs and attorney’s fees amounting to $25.00.

As the matter in dispute does not “exceed one hundred dollars, exclusive of interest,” we are without jurisdiction of this appeal.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Diana KOLEV, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EUROMOTORS WEST/THE AUTO GALLERY; Motorcars West LLC; HM Gray Family II Inc; Gray Family II LLC; Bennett Automotive I Inc; Bennett Automotive II Inc, Defendants-Appellees. and Porsche Cars North America, Inc., Defendant.

No. 09-55963.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 11, 2012.

Martin W. Anderson, Anderson Law Firm, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Diana Kolev, Sherman Oaks, CA, pro se.

Aaron H. Jacoby, Esquire, Arent Fox, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for DefendantsAppellees.

Brian Takahashi, Bowman *&*Brooke, Gardena, CA, for Defendant.

Before: D.W. NELSON, STEPHEN REINHARDT, and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The Opinion filed September 20, 2011, and appearing at 658 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir.2011), is withdrawn. *Carver v. Lehman,*558 F.3d 869, 878-79 (9th Cir.2009) (a panel may withdraw an opinion sua sponte before the mandate issues). It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. With the opinion withdrawn, the Defendants-Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc and the Plaintiff-Appellant’s petition for rehearing are moot. The parties may file a petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc upon the filing of a new decision by the court.

Additionally, submission of this case is vacated pending the issuance of a decision by the California Supreme Court in *Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co. LLC,*No. S199119.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-50166

Summary Calendar

 

JOSE OSCAR CHAVEZ-DOMINGUEZ, also known as Jose Antonio

Chavez,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SAN ANTONIO POLICE DEPARTMENT; MARTI LAURENZ; AL A. PHILIPPUS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-00-CV-629

- - - - - - - - - -

October 24, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Oscar Chavez-Dominguez (Chavez) appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to

prosecute. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). Although Chavez did not

file any pleading entitled “notice of appeal,” he did file within

the appeal period a pleading which evinced an intent to appeal

and which identified Chavez as the party appealing as well as the

judgment he sought to appeal. See FED. R. APP. P. 3(c)(1)(A)&(B);
No. 02-50166

-2-

Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Because the

pleading did not identify the court to which the appeal was being

taken, this court’s jurisdiction over this appeal is uncertain. 

See FED. R. APP. P. 3(c)(1)(C); cf., Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244,

248 (1992); McLemore v. Landry, 898 F.2d 996, 999 (5th Cir.

1990). A determination on this point is unnecessary, however, as

the district court’s dismissal for failure to prosecute was not

an abuse of discretion. See McNeal v. Papasan, 842 F.2d 787,

789-90 (5th Cir. 1988); United States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309,

310 (5th Cir. 2000). Chavez has been deported to El Salvador

and, despite an order from the district court, failed to appear

for the docket call and failed to offer any explanation of how he

intends to pursue this action from another country. This appeal

is therefore frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 July 30, 2013 
 BY HAND 
 James Chambers 
  

	Re:	Revised Severance Arrangements 

 Dear James:

 Reference is made to your offer letter with Weight Watchers International, Inc. (the “Company”), dated December 6, 2012
(the “Offer Letter”). In connection with your appointment as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, the Company wishes to amend the terms of the Offer Letter in order to amend the severance benefits available to you should your
employment with the Company be terminated other than for Cause. Accordingly, the Severance provision of the Compensation and Benefit details of the Offer Letter are hereby amended to read as follows: 

“In the event of termination by the Corporation of your employment other than for Cause (as such term is defined in those certain
Terms and Conditions for Employee Stock Awards to be executed in connection with the Incentive Equity Award described above), subject to your execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims in favor of the Corporation and its affiliates
(which release will be provided to you promptly after any such termination), the Corporation shall pay you an amount equal to the sum of (x) twelve (12) months of Base Salary plus (y) your target annual bonus for the year in which
such termination occurred, payable in one lump sum within thirty (30) days of the effective date of the release of claims, and (b) provided you make the necessary election, the Corporation shall pay for your continued health coverage under
the Corporation-sponsored health plans pursuant to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”) for twelve (12) months following the termination (or such shorter period of time if you obtain alternative health coverage
from another employer); provided, however, such Severance shall not be paid in the event termination results from a change in control of the Corporation and benefits or other consideration in connection therewith is payable pursuant to a continuity
or other agreement with the Corporation. In addition, to the extent that any restrictive covenants you may be subject to expire by their terms prior to the twelve (12) month anniversary of any such termination, you agree that such covenants
shall be extended through such date.” 

*        *        * 







 To confirm your agreement with the amendment of the Offer Letter as set forth above, please sign where
indicated below, and return to the Company, to the attention of Nick Hotchkin. 
  

			
	Sincerely
	
	Weight Watchers International, Inc.
	
	 /s/ Raymond Debbane

	By:	 	Raymond Debbane
	Title:	 	Chairman
	
	Agreed and Accepted:
	
	 /s/ James Chambers

	James Chambers
	Dated: July 31, 2013


  
 2
EXHIBIT 31.1
                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gaye Adams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10 QSB of Online  Originals,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

    a)     designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
           material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including  its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities,  particularly  during the  period in which  this  quarterly
           report is being prepared;

    b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
           and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
           of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)     presented in this report  our conclusions  about the effectiveness of
           the disclosure controls and  procedures based on our evaluation as of
           the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

    a)     all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
           record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
           identified for the registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
           internal controls; and

    b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who  have a significant  role in  the registrant's internal
           controls; and

6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes
in  internal  controls  or in other  factors  that  could  significantly  affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.

Date:  October 13, 2006


By: /s/ Gaye Adams
    --------------------
         Gaye Adams
         President and CEO