alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.6


 


GENERAL AGREEMENT


 


Between


 


Arkadia International and JK Auto Sales


 


This General Agreement (“Agreement”) of
business activity is made as of the 14th day of March 2013, by and between two independent companies, Arkadia International
Nevada Corp. and JK Auto Sales independent car dealer.


 


RECITALS


 


The parties have agreed to make together export-import
business and to conduct its business in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.


 


TERMS OF AGREEMENT


 


1. Address


 


For Arkadia International: Their principal office- 5348 VEGAS
DR. LAS VEGAS, NV 89108


 


For JK Auto Sales: 8575 Miramar Place #A,
San Diego, CA 92121


 


2. Purpose. The Parties is organized for the following purpose:


 


a. Arkadia International can buy cars from
JK Auto Sales at auction’s wholesale prices.


 


b. JK Auto Sales can sell cars, parts
to Arkadia International at wholesale prices.


 


c. Arkadia International will assist in
finding buyers for JK Auto Sales and assist with shipping.


 





The sides may enter into, make and perform all contracts and
all other undertakings and engage in any and all transactions that may deem necessary or advisable to carry out its purposes.


 


3. Terms. The agreement shall continue during 3 years.


 


4. Accounts. The capital profits and contributions,
cash flow, profits and losses, reflects in Balance Sheets, Statements of Operations, Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
and Statements of Cash Flows.


 


5. Managing. The general management, control and conduct of
all business deals shall be conducted jointly.


 


6. Withdrawal from Agreement. Each company may notice to each
other at least seventy-five (75) days prior to the last day of any fiscal year, elect to withdraw from the Agreement.


 


7. Causes for Termination. The agreement shall be terminated
upon the earlier of:


 


a. The incompetency, insolvency or death of all the
directors; or


 


b. The decree of any court of competent jurisdiction
directing the dissolution or termination of the Agreement; or


 


c. Execution of a written declaration of intention to
terminate the Agreement by one or both of the sides; or


 


EXECUTION


 


Intending to be legally bound, the parties executed this
Agreement whereupon it entered into full force and effect in accordance with its terms as of March 14, 2013


 


	Arkadia
    International Inc.	JK
                                      Auto Sales
	5348
    Vegas Drive #1107, Las Vegas, NV 89108	8575
                                                          Miramar Place #A, San Diego, CA 82121
	/s/
    Vladimir Shekhtman	/s/
                                  Leon Krentsel 
	Vladimir
Shekhtman (Director) 	Leon
                                                   Krentsel (Director)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LILM, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,**George I. Norman, III**, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of            the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ | **GEORGEI.NORMAN,III** |
|-----|------------------------|

 

**George I. Norman, III**

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Accounting Officer

August 13, 2008

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its            staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.

|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation                         
|------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|       | General Partner                                                   
|       |                                                                   
|       | /S/ Kelly Tucek                                                   
|       |                                                                   
|Name:  | Kelly Tucek                                                       
|Title: | Vice President of the General Partner and                         
|       | principal financial officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.
|Date:  | August 4, 2004
#### Winifred K. Day, Appellant, v One Beacon Insurance, Respondent.

Submitted May 20, 2013;

decided June 26, 2013

*986Motion by the New York State Academy of Trial Lawyers for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for reargument herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed.

Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14739]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5280-N-24]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: June 26, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: June 18, 2009.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. E9-14739 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 
 SCHLUMBERGER 1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
 Third Amendment 

Schlumberger Limited, a Curaçao corporation, having heretofore adopted the Schlumberger 1998 Stock Option Plan (the
“Plan”), and having reserved the right under Section 12 thereof to amend the Plan, does hereby amend Section 3(a) of the Plan by adding the following sentence to the end thereto, effective as of June 30, 2013: 

“The foregoing notwithstanding, with respect to an employee who has received a Stock Option and whose employment is transferred
directly and without interruption to a corporation, limited liability company or other entity (a ‘OneSubsea Company’) pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of that certain Master Formation Agreement by and among Cameron
International Corporation, the Company, Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Schlumberger B.V., dated as of November 14, 2012, and the related agreements contemplated therein, such employee’s employment with the Company shall include
employment with a OneSubsea Company for all purposes under the Plan (other than eligibility for new grants), and any Stock Options shall not be affected by such employee’s subsequent transfer of employment directly and without interruption from
a OneSubsea Company to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, from the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to a One Subsea Company or between OneSubsea Companies.” 
 Approved on behalf of Schlumberger Limited by: 

Name:    /s/    Alexander C. Juden 
 Title:      Secretary and General Counsel
**EXHIBIT 22 (a)**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES**

 

**OF**

 

**MINUTEMAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

 

Multi–Clean Division ofMinuteman International, Inc.

600 Cardigan Road

Shoreview, Minnesota 55126

 

Minuteman Canada, Inc.

2210 Drew Road

Mississauga

Ontario L5S 1B1 Canada

 

Minuteman International ForeignSales Corporation

c/o Ernst & Young Services,Ltd.

P.O. Box 261 Bay Street

Bridgetown, Barbados

 

Minuteman European B.V.

Haverstraat 31

2153 GB Nieuw–Vennep

The Netherlands

 

Minuteman PowerBoss, Inc.

175 Anderson Street

Aberdeen, North Carolina 28315
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of


Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Richard Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of Spherix Incorporated (the “Company”), in compliance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:





●
Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








●
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard Cohen

Richard Cohen

Chief Financial Officer

April 30, 2015





A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Spherix Incorporated and will be retained by Spherix Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Gina DeFrancesco, Appellant, v Metro-North Railroad et al., Respondents.

[975 NYS2d 876]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered June 20, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claims under the New York State Human Rights Law (State HRL) and New York City Human Rights Law (City HRL) for discrimination and retaliation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s claims for retaliation under the State and City HRLs were properly dismissed since plaintiff failed to demonstrate that she was engaging in a protected activity or that *446there was a causal connection between the activity and the adverse action *(Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind,*3 NY3d 295, 312-313 [2004]). Defendant Metro-North Railroad demonstrated that plaintiff was terminated for the nonretaliatory reason that she refused to use an electronic ticket issuing machine (TIM), which was mandatory for her position as a conductor. Plaintiff has failed to come forward with any evidence from which a “jury could find defendant liable under any of the evidentiary routes” *(Bennett v Health Mgt. Sys., Inc.,*92 AD3d 29, 45 [1st Dept 2011], *lv denied*18 NY3d 811 [2012]).

The motion court also correctly found that, although plaintiff did not establish a recognized disability under either the State or City HRL, Metro-North engaged in a good faith interactive process and offered plaintiff a choice of positions that did not require use of the TIM, which she rejected *(see Phillips v City of New York,*66 AD3d 170, 175 [1st Dept 2009]). Metro-North was not obligated to exempt plaintiff from the system-wide mandatory use of the TIM *(see Pimentel v Citibank, N.A.,*29 AD3d 141, 145-146 [1st Dept 2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 707 [2006]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 31626(U).]
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-B ("Issuer") for the period
ending  March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 14th day of May, 2004.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-B
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited Partnership  II-B and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-B and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3384 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3384

To direct the General Accountability Office to conduct a full audit of 
 hurricane protection funding and cost estimates associated with post-
                     Katrina hurricane protection.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2010

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the General Accountability Office to conduct a full audit of 
 hurricane protection funding and cost estimates associated with post-
                     Katrina hurricane protection.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUDIT OF HURRICANE PROTECTION FUNDING AND COST ESTIMATES.

    (a) In General.--As soon as practicable after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Government Accountability Office, in coordination with 
the National Academy of Engineering, shall conduct and submit to 
Congress a full audit of hurricane protection funding and cost 
estimates associated with post-Katrina hurricane protection.
    (b) Purposes.--The purposes of the audit shall be--
            (1) to identify the causes for the extraordinary 
        miscalculations in cost estimates of damage caused by Hurricane 
        Katrina that were completed before the date of enactment of 
        this Act;
            (2) to conduct an analysis of resources available and work 
        required with respect to hurricane protection funding and post-
        Katrina hurricane protection; and
            (3) to identify strategies to replenish reprogrammed 
        funding from out-year work to immediate needs.
                                 <all>
```
```

EXHIBIT 99.2

     Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, As Adopted  Pursuant to
     Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Thomas G. Seifert,  the Chief Financial Officer of iDial Networks,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
     December 31, 2002 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of
     Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 31, 2003

                                          /s/ Thomas G. Seifert
                                          ---------------------
                                          Name: Thomas G. Seifert
                                                -----------------
                                          Title: Chief Financial Officer
```
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

 
 



 
 CONSULTING AGREEMENT 
 SIXTH AMENDMENT 
 This Sixth Amendment, to the Consulting Agreement, is made effective as
of July 1, 2013 (the “Sixth Amendment Effective Date”) and is entered into by and between Vical Incorporated (“Vical”), a Delaware Corporation, having a place of business at 10390 Pacific Center Court, San Diego, CA
92121-4340 and Gary A. Lyons (the “Consultant”), an individual having a principal address of 1344 Stratford Court, Del Mar, CA 92014. 

Whereas, Vical and Consultant entered into the Consulting Agreement (the “Agreement”), effective August 1, 2010 which has been further
amended thereby extending the Term until June 30, 2013; 
 Whereas, Vical and Consultant wish to further amend the Agreement to extend the
Term until December 31, 2013; 
 Now, therefore, in consideration of the covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as
follows: 
 Exhibit A of the Agreement, a previously amended, is hereby amended to be replaced in its entirety as follows:

  

	Term:	This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2013, unless renewed in a writing signed by both parties for an additional six (6) months. Either party
shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time with thirty (30) days’ written notice to the other party. 


Except as amended hereby, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect. 

In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Sixth Amendment to the Consulting Agreement to be effective as of the Sixth Amendment Effective Date.

  

									
	Vical Incorporated	 		 	Gary A. Lyons
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Anthony Ramos
	 		 		 	
	Name:	 	 Anthony Ramos
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Gary A. Lyons

	Title:	 	 Chief Accounting Officer
	 		 	Name:	 	 Gary A. Lyons

	Date:	 	 5/29/13
	 		 	Date:	 	 5/30/13
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II-OW (the Registrant) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief
Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    LEO F. WELLS, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III         
|Chief Executive Officer   
|November 12, 2004         
|                          
|/s/    DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
|Douglas P. Williams       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|November 12, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2844

JAMES P. MIXON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA VITAL RECORDS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-870-N)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James P. Mixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Carol Smith Nance, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

civil suit for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mixon

v. Virginia, No. CA-96-870-N (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 1996). We deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED