alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         128,958
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                83,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    541,475
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         274,509
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           278,205
<LOANS>                                      4,583,358
<ALLOWANCE>                                     40,423
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,034,116
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,894,971
<SHORT-TERM>                                   395,318
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            108,542
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,125,361
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              416
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     509,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               6,034,116
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                292,828
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               27,515
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                50,620
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               370,963
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             152,608
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             212,809
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          158,154
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,860
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 465
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                169,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,414
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      28,705
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,705
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.01
<LOANS-NON>                                     12,121
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,690
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   257
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,274
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                38,569
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,134
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,128
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               40,423
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            40,423
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sharon S. Rickenbacker, Appellant.

[978 NYS2d 707]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered on or about July 10, 2012, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, DeGrasse, Freedman and Gische, JJ.
#### Union Square Park Community Coalition, Inc., et al., Appellants, v New York City Department of Parks and Recreation et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 12, 2013;

decided September 17, 2013

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that denied appellants’ motion for a preliminary injunction, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action *1071within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  ONLINE  ORIGINALS,  INC.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2006,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Gaye
Adams,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  June 26, 2006


By: /s/ Gaye Adams
    -------------------------
         Gaye Adams
         Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

RAYMOND FOGEL,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 208 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
#### PENMAC CORPORATION et al. v. FALCON PENCIL CORPORATION.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 23, 1942.

*493Frederic P. Warfield, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Percy Freeman, of New York City, for defendant.

LEIBELL, District Judge.

The following rulings are made on plaintiffs’ objections (dated March 13, 1942) to defendant’s interrogatories (dated March 3, 1942).

Objection is sustained to the last clause (“and what Plaintiffs assert such claim or claims cover”) of interrogatories 3, 9, 15, 21, 27, 33, 39 and 45.

Objection is sustained to subdivision (b) of interrogatories 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, 34, 40 and 46.

Objection is sustained to interrogatories 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48.

Objection is sustained to interrogatories 57, 58, 59, 62, 65, 67, 68, 79, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88 and 90.

All other objections to interrogatories are overruled.

Plaintiff is directed to answer all interrogatories to which objection has not been made and all interrogatories to which objections, if made, have not been sustained.

Defendant served on March 5, 1942, thirty-five requests for admissions under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 36, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. That rule operates extrajudicially. The Court will not consider an application for relief from compliance with the rule. Modern Food Process Co., Inc., v. Chester Packing & Provision Co., Inc., D.C., 30 F.Supp. 520. Plaintiffs’ attorney “will have to decide for himself whether there are good reasons for refusing either to admit or deny and take the risk of having to pay the costs incurred in proving them, instead of having the Court advise him in advance as to' what course he ought to take”. However, I will extend plaintiffs’ time ten days after the entry of an order on this motion, within which to deny specifically the matters of which an admission is requested or to set forth in detail the reasons why plaintiffs cannot truthfully either admit or deny those matters.

Submit an order in accordance with this memorandum, on two days’ notice.
No. 4963.

(Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.)

#### CLARENCE O. WILCOX vs. LOUISVILLE *&*NASHVILLE R. R. COMPANY.

P. E. Rainold for plaintiff and appellee.

Denegre & Blair and Chaffe for defendant and appellant.

*371April 20, 1910.

Rehearing refused May 11, 1910.

ST. PAUL, J.

It was a condition of the ticket purchased by plaintiff, and the sole condition, that he would have it “validated” at a given place within twenty-four hours before he offered it for return passage.

For this purpose plaintiff was required to present the ticket at the proper place and at a reasonable time. If defendant’s agent was absent at the time, plaintiff was under no obligation to return.

A reasonable time at which to present a ticket for validation is that at which one may reasonably expect to find the agent at his office; this includes not only the time at which the agent is required to be present, but also that at which he is, in fact, usually present.

The evidence shows that the plaintiff did present his ticket at a time at which the agent was usually present at his office. Owing to circumstances unforeseen he happened not to be present that morning.

Plaintiff was, therefore, within his strict legal rights.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of LILM, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, George I. Norman,
III, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/S/   GEORGE I. NORMAN, III
-------------------------------
George I. Norman, III
Principal Accounting Officer
June 25, 2007



     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jing Hao,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference
into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language
in such filing.



|Dated: August 8, 2019 | By: | /s/
    Jing Hao             
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------------
|                      |     | Jing Hao                     
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer      
|                      |     | (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 3.1.7

|                             
|-----------------------------
|State of Delaware of State   
|Secretary of State           
|Division Corporations        
|Delivered 06:39 PM 04/29/2008
|FILED 06:39 PM 04/29/2008    
|SRV 080484470-3838993 FILE   



CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

TO THE

FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

TACTICAL SOLUTION PARTNERS, INC.

It is hereby certified that:

I.

The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the "Corporation") is Tactical Solution Partners, Inc.

2.

The First Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended as follows:

(a)

Article I is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

"The name of the Corporation is Brekford International Corp."

(b)

Article IV(A) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

Authorized Capital Stock. The total number of shares of capital stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 170,000,000, consisting of 150,000,000 shares of common stock, with the par value of $0.0001 per share ("COMMON STOCK"), and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with the par value of $0.0001 per share ("PREFERRED STOCK").

3.

The amendment of the First Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation herein certified has been duly adopted and written consent has been given in accordance with the provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation has executed this Certificate of Amendment of the First Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation as of the 29th day of April, 2008.



| |                                             
| | --------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Ryan E. Kirch                           
| | Name: Ryan E. Kirch                         
| | Title: Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 2 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 2

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 3, 2019.
    Resolved, That the Senate be informed that a quorum of the House of 
Representatives has assembled; that Nancy Pelosi, a Representative from the 
State of California, has been elected Speaker; and that Karen L. Haas, a citizen 
of the State of Maryland, has been elected Clerk of the House of Representatives 
of the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Latb6CtAL S17 BELO tO/ LE

CLEATS Lh 7 S _
Ybo/ Cue SH B sIS a) |
; . Aitte/tii FK OG/OP - $606 |
LLRIL ALE) Alo
OWL OF Cen. MYO LAILS 07° FRIAS.
LL L2 Foe - 47? Bwdete MLI bo Ross
GLE. ST
ALASTIV OFA LEO

ME! CLR BBAI-Ay Bs YOGFE L0°bLRLAL cons zit, ARehtaniw £é2. Mo? titir ao
HALEAS LAOS

LLeew,

BUE 70 CAC AK OCranttntanun bet ihaan NY Ant ant Aa
Dan CUOanrey tina aaa ac Pha efaftuc"a< mr Lace andl Mal Pon be."1ne ~
Tha PYELOSS Ub Ane Cirn2éare¢ okies

Pad. dicunbstaciy Yar can Glen. WMA Atlatead 7b AY cose. Ad Abtiime war
filed. Ly Da AtYGnge as teat! ac Pha Set AnA Any ocAints Ptrtare Linc
WOE AY MeO? anty Saale, / 401. pasrcat/Y A0ABUO GIG AH \evete £Fafhen
Width, fa Bat / A1ad La acid Ae A07- 20 Aye Ay ee
lund bY Law ne Fhe Coweres 7

iad. Aah AAP Case
tel Fle mare And ny Arete 6 ALO Lo ay Peved Atti, Haat Lote.

SOSPLTFLUS,

Aaah St FPG Ra EF
Lone tur”
Yeo Srwe. Se

AMatallar EVO?

RECEIVED IN
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 102015

Abel Acosta, Clerk
96-2495.

#### In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Hildebrandt.

This matter is pending before the court upon respondent’s notice of appeal from the January 27, 1997 order of the Commission of Judges. On March 3, 1997, respondent filed objections to the order of the Commission of Judges and his brief in support, and on March 18, 1997, complainant filed a merit brief in opposition to respondent’s objections. On March 25,1997, respondent filed a motion for leave to file a reply brief. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to file a reply brief be, and is, hereby, denied for want of four votes on the following vote:

Moyer, C.J., Resnick and Cook, JJ., vote to deny.

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., vote to grant.

Douglas, J., not participating.

It is further ordered, *sna sponte,*that respondent’s reply brief filed March 25, 1997, be stricken.

Douglas, J., not participating.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                              6,460
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      50,838
<ALLOWANCES>                        1,454
<INVENTORY>                        47,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    5,047
<PP&E>                            103,486
<DEPRECIATION>                     45,666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    218,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              77,126
<BONDS>                           134,196
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                               83
<OTHER-SE>                         (2,379)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      218,545
<SALES>                           269,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
<CGS>                             206,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     241,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      352
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 18,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     9,497
<INCOME-TAX>                        5,364
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 4,133
<DISCONTINUED>                     (1,627)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                        2,506
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.30
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frantzy J. Rodney, Appellant.

Submitted June 25, 2012;

decided August 28, 2012

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 denied as unnecessary and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 118 (Monday, June 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29510-29511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14628]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5300-N-02]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
HUD's Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Housing Counseling Program

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing 
Commissioner, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD announces the availability on its Web site of the 
applicant information, submission deadlines, funding criteria and other 
requirements for HUD's Housing Counseling Program NOFA for FY2009. 
Approximately $58 million appropriated under the Department of Housing 
and Urban Development Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 111-8, approved 
March 11, 2009) for HUD's Housing Counseling Program is available 
through this NOFA. Applicants for HUD's Housing Counseling Program must 
address the requirements established by HUD's Fiscal Year 2009 Notice 
of Funding Availability (NOFA) Policy Requirements and General Section 
to HUD's FY2009 NOFAs for Discretionary Programs (General Section) 
published

[[Page 29511]]

on December 29, 2008 (73 FR 79548), as amended April 16, 2009 (74 FR 
17685). Applicants should take particular note that they must follow 
the application instructions contained in the FY2009 Housing Counseling 
NOFA and not use those in the General Section. The notice providing 
information regarding the application process, funding criteria and 
eligibility requirements is available on the HUD Web site at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding specific program 
requirements should be directed to the agency contact identified in the 
program NOFA. Questions regarding the 2009 General Section should be 
directed to the Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight 
at 202-708-0667 (this is not a toll-free number) or the NOFA 
Information Center at 1-800-HUD-8929 (toll-free). Persons with hearing 
or speech impairments may access these numbers via TTY by calling the 
Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.

    Dated: June 12, 2009.
Brian D. Montgomery,
Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E9-14628 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P