alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 20, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 20, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24I0192. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF SAVANNAH v. GLADYS 

CHARLENE D. ALTMAN.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

STCV2101138
#### In the Matter of New York Times Company et al., Appellants, v City of New York Police Department, Respondent.

Submitted April 1, 2013;

decided May 7, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
TDCJ Offender Details Page 1 of2 

~~ 5~Cf, Of 

TE~J~.S Di;PARTMENT OF CRIMINA~ JUSTICI; IEJ ii•Iilft.lul§ Iii New Offender Search 

Offender Information Details 

Return to Search list 

SID Number: 

TDCJ Number: 

Name: 

Race: 

Gender: 

008: 

Maximum Sentence Date: 

Current Facility: 

Projected Release Date: 

Parole Eligibility Date: 

Offender Visitation Eligible: 

06875272 

02004900 

DILLESHAW,CRISTLEY JOSEPH 

w 

M 

1984-10-27 

NOT AVAILABLE 

SAYLE 

NOT AVAILABLE 

NOT AVAILABLE 

YES 

Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day 

on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and 

friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for a visit. 

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: 

Scheduled Release Date: Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. 

Scheduled Release Type: Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

Scheduled Release Location: Will be determined when release date is scheduled. 

Offense Histo 

Offense Date Offense Sentence Date County Case No. Sentence (YY -MM-DD) 

Return to Search list 

http://offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=06875272 7/16/2015
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brent
A. Latta, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of
            operations of the Company.




                                    /s/ Brent A. Latta
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer

May 6, 2005




[Signed originals of these written statements required by Section 906 have
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CREENERGY Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q  for the  period  ended  February  28,  2011,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Shari
Sookarookoff,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date:    April 12, 2011



By:      /s/ Shari Sookarookoff
         ----------------------------------
         Shari Sookarookoff
         President/Chief Executive Officer
         and Chief Financial (Accounting) Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the
financial statements of Part II. Item 8 of the December 31, 1996
Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           15131
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3649
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 49100
<PP&E>                                          242017
<DEPRECIATION>                                  114581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  177679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10747
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                     (37183)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    177679
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 24743
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  9847
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   123
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               19061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4288)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (23306)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     19018
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    19.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    17.82
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40513

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GEOVANI ALEXANDER VIALTA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:14-CR-963-1

Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Geovani Alexander Vialta

raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. 

Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 & n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), which held 

that the generic, contemporary definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” does not 

require the age of consent to be below 17 years old and does not include the 

asserted age-differential requirement. He also raises an argument that he 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 15, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40513 Document: 00513307976 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
No. 15-40513

2

concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Elizondo-Hernandez, 755 F.3d 779, 

781-82 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 1011 (2015), which held that the 

Texas offense of indecency with a child by contact satisfied the generic 

definition of “sexual abuse of minor.” The motion for summary disposition is 

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-40513 Document: 00513307976 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2015
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SON THANH UONG, DOC #314757, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-122

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 2, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Michael F. Andrews, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Megan Olson, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs 

Cline, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tampa, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 41243

BRUCE M. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ROGELIO VALDEZ, In his Individual and Official Capacities,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GRAVES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges

.

PER CURIAM:

Anderson notes that after we issued our decision, Gregory Perkes was

nominated by the Governor to once again serve as a justice on the Thirteenth

Court of Appeals. This relates “to changed circumstances since the case was

decided by the district court ” and by our panel, which do not provide grounds

for panel rehearing

. 1 Our decision and denial of rehearing are “[w]ithout

1 Anastasiadis v. S.S. Little John , 347 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1965) (mem.) ; see also

Armster v. U.S. Dist. Court , 806 F.2d 1347, 1356 (9th Cir. 1986) (“A panel is simply not capable of having overlooked or misapprehended ‘points of . . . fact’ occurring subsequent to its initial decision.”) ; 16AA Fed. Prac. & Proc. Juris. § 3986.1 (4th ed.) (“New factual material, United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

February 19, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce
ClerkNo. 17

- 41243

2 prejudice to [the] pursuit of any appropriate remedies which may be available

in the district court.” 2 We express no opinion on the availability of further relief

in the context of the close professiona l relationship between judge and staff

attorney.

The petition for panel rehearing is denied.

including material concerning events occurring afte r the initial decision, is not likely to be considered [in a petition for panel rehearing].”).

2 Anastasiadis , 347 F.2d at 823.
# NIH...Turning Discovery Into Health®
Exhibit No. 21

Listof Subsidiaries

 

 

Thesubsidiaries of Barnwell Industries, Inc., at September 30, 2009were:

 

 
|                                      | Jurisdiction of                |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Name of Subsidiary                        | Incorporation or  Organization |
| Barnwell  of Canada, Limited              | Delaware                       |
| Water  Resources International, Inc. | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell  Hawaiian Properties, Inc.  | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell  Kona Corporation                | Hawaii                         |
| Kaupulehu  Developments                   | Hawaii                         |
| Cambridge  Hawaii Limited Partnership     | Hawaii                         |
| Barnwell  Management Co., Inc.       | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell  Shallow Oil, Inc.          | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell  Geothermal Corporation          | Delaware                       |
| Victoria  Properties, Inc.           | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell  Financial Corporation           | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell  Alakea Properties, Inc.    | Hawaii                         |
| Kaupulehu  Investors, LLC                 | Hawaii                         |
| Mauka  3K, LLC                            | Hawaii                         |
| Kaupulehu  Mauka Investors, LLC           | Hawaii                         |
| Kaupulehu  2007, LLLP                     | Hawaii                         |
| Barnwell  Makai, Inc.                | Hawaii                         |
| Barnwell  of Israel, Ltd.                 | Israel                         |
| Barnwell  Oil & Gas, Ltd.        | Israel                         |
| Bill  Robbins Drilling, Ltd.              | Alberta, Canada                |
| Gypsy  Petroleum Ltd.                     | Alberta, Canada                |
| Dartmouth  Petroleum, Ltd.                | Alberta, Canada                |
| J.H.  Wilson Associates, Ltd.             | Alberta, Canada                |

 

121

----
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 15, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00400-CR

No. 05-15-00401-CR

No. 05-15-00402-CR

BRANDI LYNN GEORGE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F14-54068-U, F14-54069-U, F14-54070-U

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Fillmore, Myers, and Evans

Opinion by Justice Myers

Brandi Lynn George pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine in an amount less 

than one gram (05-15-00400-CR); possession of heroin in an amount less than one gram (05-15-

00401-CR); and endangering a child (05-15-00402-CR). On May 27, 2014, the trial court 

deferred adjudicating appellant’s guilt, placed her on four years’ community supervision, and 

assessed a $1,500 fine in each case. The State later moved to adjudicate appellant’s guilt in each 

case. Following a hearing on March 11, 2015, the trial court denied the motions to adjudicate 

guilt and modified the conditions of appellant’s community supervision. Appellant filed a notice 

of appeal from the trial court’s orders denying the motions to adjudicate guilt.
–2–

An order modifying the conditions of community supervision is not an appealable order. 

See Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977). Accordingly, we lack 

jurisdiction over the appeals. See id.

We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

150400F.U05

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BRANDI LYNN GEORGE, Appellant

No. 05-15-00400-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-54068-U.

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, Justices 

Fillmore and Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 15th day of July, 2015.
–4–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BRANDI LYNN GEORGE, Appellant

No. 05-15-00401-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-54069-U.

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, Justices 

Fillmore and Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 15th day of July, 2015.
–5–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BRANDI LYNN GEORGE, Appellant

No. 05-15-00402-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-54070-U.

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers, Justices 

Fillmore and Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 15th day of July, 2015.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                   9
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from this
company's  Consolidated  Statement of Operations and Consolidated Statement of
Condition  and is qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1000

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                       34,807
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       67,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 579,836
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      579,836
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        579,836
<LOANS>                                   3,060,547
<ALLOWANCE>                                  72,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            3,856,505
<DEPOSITS>                                2,061,357
<SHORT-TERM>                              1,283,635
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          31,380
<LONG-TERM>                                 249,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        233
<OTHER-SE>                                  230,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>            3,856,505
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             216,634
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            43,367
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            260,001
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           87,199
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          161,031
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        98,970
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              49,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              62,499
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   35,447
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (2,195)
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 33,252
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 2.70
<LOANS-NON>                                  13,221
<LOANS-PAST>                                      0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                              2,079
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               6,900
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             87,818
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 6,400
<RECOVERIES>                                  3,956
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            85,374
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         85,374
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0



</TABLE>
Order entered March 17, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01441-CV

EVELYN DENSON, Appellant

V.

L AND L LANDSCAPING, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-04721-B

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 12, 2020 motion for an extension of 

time to file her opening brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be 

filed no later than April 20, 2020.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 14 (Friday, January 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 12:00 p.m., Monday, January 26, 2009.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave 
Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-
2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 16, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-1513 Filed 1-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

SON THANH UONG, DOC #314757, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-122 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 2, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Michael F. Andrews, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 15, 2015

NO. 03-13-00292-CV

Appellant, Fernando DeLeon// Cross-Appellant, John Lacey

v.

Appellee, John Lacey// Cross-Appellee, Fernando DeLeon

APPEAL FROM 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on April 3, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the district court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
Order entered July 16, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01229-CR

JOHNNY RAY WALKER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-60285-Y

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s July 15, 2015 second motion to extend time to file its 

brief only to the extent that we ORDER the State to file its brief by MONDAY, AUGUST 17, 

2015. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Concho Resources Inc.
(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
    May 8, 2009
    
    /s/ Timothy A. LeachTimothy A. LeachDirector, Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)