29474 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 118 / Monday, June 22, 2009 / Notices 

2Apex Foods Ltd. (‘‘Apex’’). 

3Bionic Sea Food (‘‘Bionic’’). 

4 Gemini Sea Food Ltd. (‘‘Gemini’’). 

(‘‘CRU’’), room 1117 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a copy of the Final Decision 

Memo can be accessed directly on our 

website at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/. The 

paper copy and electronic version of the 

Final Decision Memo are identical in 

content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record as 

well as comments received from parties 

regarding our Preliminary Results, we 

have made revisions to the margin 

calculation for Hiep Thanh and 

Acomfish in the final results. For all 

changes to the calculations of Hiep 

Thanh and Acomfish, see the Final 

Decision Memo and company specific 

analysis memoranda. For changes to the 

surrogate values see Memorandum to 

the File, through Alex Villanueva, 

Program Manager, AC/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, from Alan Ray, case analyst, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, and 

Fourth Antidumping Duty Third New 

Shipper Review of Certain Frozen Fish 

Fillets from the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Surrogate Values for the Final 

Results. 

Final Results of the Reviews 

The weighted-average dumping 

margins for the POR are as follows: 

CERTAIN FROZEN FISH FILLETS FROM

VIETNAM

Manufacturer/Exporter Weighted-Average 

Margin 

Hiep Thanh ................... 6.68 

Acomfish ................... 0.00 

Assessment 

The Department will determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b). We have 

calculated importer–specific duty 

assessment rates on a per-unit basis. 

Specifically, we divided the total 

dumping margins (calculated as the 

difference between normal value and 

export price or constructed export price) 

for each importer by the total quantity 

of subject merchandise sold to that 

importer during the POR to calculate a 

per-unit assessment amount. In this and 

future reviews, we will direct CBP to 

assess importer–specific assessment 

rates based on the resulting per-unit 

(i.e., per–kilogram) rates by the weight 

in kilograms of each entry of the subject 

merchandise during the POR. The 

Department intends to issue appropriate 

assessment instructions directly to CBP 

15 days after publication of the final 

results of these new shipper reviews. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results of these 

new shipper reviews for all shipments 

of subject merchandise by Hiep Thanh 

and Acomfish, entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’): (1) for 

subject merchandise produced and 

exported by Hiep Thanh, the cash 

deposit rate will be the percent listed 

above, or the equivalent per–unit rate, 

for subject merchandise produced and 

exported by Acomfish, the cash deposit 

rate will be zero; (2) for subject 

merchandise exported by Hiep Thanh or 

Acomfish, but not manufactured by 

Hiep Thanh or Acomfish, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

Vietnam-wide rate of 63.88 percent; and 

(3) for subject merchandise 

manufactured by Hiep Thanh or 

Acomfish, but exported by any party 

other than Hiep Thanh or Acomfish, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the exporter. These cash 

deposit requirements will remain in 

effect until further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this POR. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties has occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

determination in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.214(h) and 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: June 15, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I Decision Memorandum 

COMMENT 1: SURROGATE 

FINANCIAL RATIOS 

A. Apex2 and Bionic3

B. Gemini4

COMMENT 2: SURROGATE VALUE 

FOR WHOLE LIVE FISH 

COMMENT 3: RESCISSION OF 

ACOMFISH 

COMMENT 4: HIEP THANH’S SALES 

TO COMPANY 1 

COMMENT 5: HIEP THAN’S SALES TO 

COMPANY 2 

COMMENT 6: ASSESSMENT OF 

DUTIES FOR HIEP THANH 

[FR Doc. E9–14607 Filed 6–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1625] 

Grant of Authority for Subzone Status, 

Thor Industries, Inc. (Recreational 

Vehicle Manufacturing), Jackson 

Center, Ohio 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act 

provides for ‘‘...the establishment... of 

foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of 

the United States, to expedite and 

encourage foreign commerce, and for 

other purposes,’’ and authorizes the 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 

qualified corporations the privilege of 

establishing foreign-trade zones in or 

adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection ports of entry; 

Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15 

CFR Part 400) provide for the 

establishment of special-purpose 

subzones when existing zone facilities 

cannot serve the specific use involved, 

and when the activity results in a 

significant public benefit and is in the 

public interest; 

Whereas, the Greater Dayton ForeignTrade Zone Inc., grantee of ForeignTrade Zone 100, has made application 

to the Board for authority to establish a 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 118 / Monday, June 22, 2009 / Notices 29475 

special-purpose subzone at the 

recreational vehicle manufacturing 

facilities of Thor Industries, Inc., located 

in Jackson Center, Ohio (FTZ Docket 

66–2008, filed 12/4/08); 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (73 FR 76611–76612, 12/17/ 

08); and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendations of the 

examiner’s report, and finds the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and the 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that approval of the application is in the 

public interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

grants authority for subzone status for 

activity related to recreational vehicle 

manufacturing at the facilities of Thor 

Industries, Inc., located in Jackson 

Center, Ohio (Subzone 100D), as 

described in the application and 

Federal Register notice, and subject to 

the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, 

including Section 400.28. 

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 12th day 

of June 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 

Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

Attest: 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–14629 Filed 6–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1626] 

Grant of Authority for Subzone Status, 

Thor Industries, Inc. (Recreational 

Vehicle and Commercial Bus 

Manufacturing), Goshen, Elkhart, 

Topeka, Bristol, Middlebury, Syracuse, 

Nappanee and Howe, Indiana 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act 

provides for ‘‘...the establishment... of 

foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of 

the United States, to expedite and 

encourage foreign commerce, and for 

other purposes,’’ and authorizes the 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 

qualified corporations the privilege of 

establishing foreign-trade zones in or 

adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection ports of entry; 

Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15 

CFR Part 400) provide for the 

establishment of special-purpose 

subzones when existing zone facilities 

cannot serve the specific use involved, 

and when the activity results in a 

significant public benefit and is in the 

public interest; 

Whereas, the St. Joseph County 

Airport Authority, grantee of ForeignTrade Zone 125, has made application 

to the Board for authority to establish a 

special-purpose subzone at the 

recreational vehicle and commercial bus 

manufacturing facilities of Thor 

Industries, Inc., located in Goshen, 

Elkhart, Topeka, Bristol, Middlebury, 

Syracuse, Nappanee and Howe, Indiana 

(FTZ Docket 67–2008, filed 12/4/08); 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (73 FR 76612–76613, 12/17/ 

08); and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendations of the 

examiner’s report, and finds the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and the 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that approval of the application is in the 

public interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

grants authority for subzone status for 

activity related to recreational vehicle 

and commercial bus manufacturing at 

the facilities of Thor Industries, Inc., 

located in Goshen, Elkhart, Topeka, 

Bristol, Middlebury, Syracuse, 

Nappanee and Howe, Indiana (Subzone 

125E), as described in the application 

and Federal Register notice, and subject 

to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations, including Section 400.28. 

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 12th day 

of June 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce, for 

Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

Attest: 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–14627 Filed 6–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Manufacturing and Services’ 

Sustainable Manufacturing Initiative; 

Update 

ACTION: Notice of second round of 

regional showcase tours in support of 

Commerce’s Sustainable Manufacturing 

Initiative; notice of event in Seattle; 

request for suggestions of other cities 

and regions to be considered for future 

tours; request for volunteer hosts to be 

considered for future tours. 

SUMMARY: As part of its Sustainable 

Manufacturing Initiative, the 

International Trade Administration’s 

Manufacturing & Services Unit is 

planning a second round of regional 

facility tours across the United States 

that will showcase sustainable business 

practices at manufacturing firms and 

service providers. This round of tours 

will use the past round of Sustainable 

Manufacturing American Regional 

Tours (SMARTs) as a template by 

traveling to a number of cities and 

regions in order to demonstrate the 

feasibility and viability of sustainable 

business practices for U.S. firms. While 

the previous round of tours focused on 

manufacturers, this round will look at 

supply chains in various regions and 

sustainability issues affecting the 

competitiveness of firms in those supply 

chains. 

DATES: Submit comments no later than 

30 days after the date of this notice. 

ADDRESSES: Address all comments 

concerning this notice to the 

Sustainable Manufacturing Initiative, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 

2213, 1401 Constitution Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC 20230 (or via the 

Internet at susmanuf@mail.doc.gov). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Matthew Howard in Manufacturing & 

Services’ Office of Trade Policy 

Analysis, 202–482–3703. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regional facility tours like the 

SMARTs are one of the main project 

areas of the Manufacturing and Services 

(MAS) Sustainable Manufacturing 

Initiative (SMI) and Public-Private 

Dialogue (for more information visit 

http://www.manufacturing.gov/ 

sustainability). In order to provide 

effective and continued support to U.S. 

companies in their sustainable 

manufacturing efforts, MAS launched 

the SMI which (a) identifies U.S. 

industry’s most pressing sustainability 

challenges and (b) facilitates public and 

private sector efforts to address these 

challenges. 

As referenced in a July 2008 Federal 

Register notice (FR 42328, July 21, 

2008), MAS held a series of SMARTs in 

2008: St. Louis, MO (July 28, 2008), 

Grand Rapids, MI (September 3, 2008), 

and Rochester, NY (September 23, 

2008). This first round of regional 

facility tours focused on U.S. 

manufacturers and showcased efforts at 

implementing and benefiting from costeffective sustainable manufacturing 

practices. As company supply chains 

become the critical component to a 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES