alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 117 (Friday, June 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14375]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of closed virtual meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council 
will meet through a Web cast, July 21-22, 2009. The purpose of the 
meeting is to discuss general Council business.

DATES: The meeting will be held on July 21 and 22, 2009, 9 a.m. to 5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held through a Webinar. Written comments 
concerning this meeting should be addressed to Nancy Stremple, 
Executive Staff to National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory 
Council, 201 14th St., SW., Yates Building (1 Central) MS-1151, 
Washington, DC 20250-1151. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2dcc7d1d4d3d1edc7d1d4edc2c0ddc2ddc1d3dec1f2d4c19cd4d7d69cc7c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ef819a8c898e8cb09a8c89b09f9d809f809c8e839caf899cc1898a8bc19a9c">[email protected]</span></a>, or via facsimile to 202-690-5792.
    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying. The public may inspect comments received at 201 14th St., SW., 
Yates Building (1 Central) MS-1151, Washington, DC 20250-1151.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Stremple, Executive Staff to 
National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council, phone 202-205-
1054.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is closed to the public. Council 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Council members; 
however, persons who wish to bring urban and community forestry matters 
to the attention of the Council may file written statements with the 
Council staff (201 14th St., SW., Yates Building (1 Central) MS-1151, 
Washington, DC 20250-1151, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#117f626563747c617d745177623f7774753f6462"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9af4e9eee8fff7eaf6ffdafce9b4fcfffeb4efe9">[email protected]</span></a>) before or after 
the meeting.

    Dated: June 12, 2009.
Robin L. Thompson,
Associate Deputy Chief, State & Private Forestry.
[FR Doc. E9-14375 Filed 6-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 355 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 355

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to direct the Chief 
  Administrative Officer to carry out an annual information security 
  training program for Members, officers, and employees of the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2019

    Miss Rice of New York (for herself and Mr. Katko) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to direct the Chief 
  Administrative Officer to carry out an annual information security 
  training program for Members, officers, and employees of the House.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Cybersecurity Training 
Resolution of 2019''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL INFORMATION SECURITY TRAINING PROGRAM FOR HOUSE MEMBERS, 
              OFFICERS, AND EMPLOYEES.

    Clause 4 of rule II of the Rules of the House of Representatives is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(e)(1) The Chief Administrative Officer shall carry out an annual 
information security training program for Members (including the 
Delegates and Resident Commissioner), officers, and employees of the 
House.
    ``(2) A new Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, or 
employee of the House shall receive training under this paragraph not 
later than 30 days after beginning service to the House.
    ``(3) Not later than January 31 of each year, each officer and 
employee of the House shall file a certification with the Chief 
Administrative Officer that the officer or employee completed an 
information security training program as established by this 
paragraph.''.
                                 <all>
```
*

The Honorable Jerome Farris, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit Court of

Appeals, sitting by designation. 

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 05a0040n.06

Filed: January 13, 2005

No. 03-2406

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT J. BOWMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

KNAPE & VOGT MANUFACTURING

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Before: DAUGHTREY, COOK, and FARRIS,*

 Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Robert Bowman appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for

Knape & Vogt Manufacturing Company. After hearing oral argument and reviewing the record, the

parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, this court determines that no jurisprudential purpose would

be served by a panel opinion and affirms the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in that

court’s opinion.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7561** 

JOSEPH NOBREGA , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:08

- cv - 00381

- LO

- JFA )

Submitted : January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS , Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Joseph Nobrega, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Nob rega seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) ; Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Nobrega has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismi ss the appeal.3 Additionally, we construe Nobrega’ s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2254 petition. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to fi le a successive § 2254 petition, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previou sly discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the petitioner guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2244(b)(2) (2012). N obrega ’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2254 petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
Denied and Opinion Filed July 13, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01493-CV

IN RE TIMOTHY GILLUM, TRUSTEE OF THE GILLUM FAMILY MASTER 

HERITAGE TRUST AND REEF R. GILLUM, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-03816

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Evans

Opinion by Justice Evans

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Court order the trial 

court to vacate its contempt judgment. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must 

show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate 

appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding). If a trial court’s contempt order is not void, it is not an abuse of discretion. In re 

Office of Atty. Gen., 422 S.W.3d 623, 628 (Tex. 2013) (orig. proceeding). A contempt order is 

void if it is beyond the power of the court or violates due process. Id. We conclude the relators 

have failed to establish a right to relief. 
–2–

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8.

 

141493F.P05

/David Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
#### Rhonda Wittorf, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

Submitted September 3, 2013;

decided September 12, 2013

Motion by New York State Trial Lawyers Association for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 113 / Monday, June 15, 2009 / Notices 28325 

public meetings to address it. TVA 

expects to release the draft EIS in early 

2010. 

Dated: June 8, 2009. 

Anda A. Ray, 

Senior Vice President, Office of Environment 

and Research. 

[FR Doc. E9–13986 Filed 6–12–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8120–08–P 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

[OMB Control No. 2900–0681] 

Agency Information Collection (IL 

Assessment) Activities Under OMB 

Review 

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits 

Administration, Department of Veterans 

Affairs. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501–3521), this notice 

announces that the Veterans Benefits 

Administration, Department of Veterans 

Affairs, will submit the collection of 

information abstracted below to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and comment. The 

PRA submission describes the nature of 

the information collection and its 

expected cost and burden; it includes 

the actual data collection instrument. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before July 15, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments 

on the collection of information through 

http://www.Regulations.gov or to VA’s 

OMB Desk Officer, Office of Information 

and Regulatory Affairs, New Executive 

Office Building, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395–7316. 

Please refer to ‘‘OMB Control No. 2900– 

0681’’ in any correspondence. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Denise McLamb, Enterprise Records 

Service (005R1B), Department of 

Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461– 

7485, FAX (202) 273–0443 or e-mail 

denise.mclamb@va.gov. Please refer to 

‘‘OMB Control No. 2900–0681.’’ 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Preliminary Independent Living 

(IL) Assessment, VA Form 28–0791. 

OMB Control Number: 2900–0681. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Abstract: VA case managers use VA 

Form 28–0791 while evaluating the 

independent living needs of veterans 

with severe disabilities. The data is used 

to determine the scope of the veteran’s 

independent living needs under the 

Vocational Rehabilitation and 

Employment program. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. The Federal Register 

Notice with a 60-day comment period 

soliciting comments on this collection 

of information was published on April 

3, 2009, at pages 15325–15326. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Estimated Annual Burden: 2,500. 

Estimated Average Burden per 

Respondent: 1 hour. 

Frequency of Response: One-time. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

2,500. 

Dated: June 10, 2009. 

By direction of the Secretary: 

Denise McLamb, 

Program Analyst, Enterprise Records Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–13984 Filed 6–12–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–P 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, David Gorodyansky, the Chief Financial Officer of INTELLIGENT BUYING. INC.  (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 15th day of August 2011.





/s/ David GorodyanskyDavid GorodyanskyPrincipal Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intelligent Buying, Inc. and will be retained by Intelligent Buying, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 116 (Thursday, June 18, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 28865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14494]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 116 / Thursday, June 18, 2009 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 28865]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2009-20 of June 12, 2009

                
Presidential Determination for the Kingdom of 
                Cambodia Under Section 2(b)(2) of the Export-Import 
                Bank Act of 1945, as amended

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 
                2(b)(C) of the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, as 
                amended (12 U.S.C. 635(b)(2)(C)), I hereby determine 
                that the Kingdom of Cambodia has ceased to be a 
                Marxist-Leninist country within the definition of such 
                term in section 2(b)(2)(B)(i) of that Act.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                determination in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 12, 2009

[FR Doc. E9-14494
Filed 6-17-09; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Abreu, Appellant.

Submitted September 10, 2012;

decided September 13, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
# Research Areas

                  - Neuroscience and Basic Behavioral Science
                  - Translational Research
                  - Services and Intervention Research
                  - AIDS Research
                  - Research Training and Career Development
                  - Small Business Research Opportunities
                  - Technology Development and Coordination
                  - Genomics Research Coordination
                  - Research on Global Mental Health
                  - Disparities Research and Workforce Diversity
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 530 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 530

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the amount of 
the Members' Representational Allowance should be increased in response 
          to increasing threats against Members of the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2019

   Mr. Green of Texas (for himself and Mr. Schweikert) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the amount of 
the Members' Representational Allowance should be increased in response 
          to increasing threats against Members of the House.

Whereas, on January 8, 2011, a gunman opened fire at a congressional event in 
        Tucson, Arizona, critically wounding Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords 
        and killing a congressional staff member and five members of the public;
Whereas, on June 14, 2017, a gunman with a rifle and sidearm opened fire on at 
        least seventeen Members of Congress, several staff, United States 
        Capitol Police officers, and members of the public in Alexandria, 
        Virginia;
Whereas, in a hearing on July 16, 2019, Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund stated 
        that threats against Members of Congress are increasing at a record pace 
        this Congress; and
Whereas every Member of the House of Representatives is in dire need of 
        additional security in response to these increased threats to 
        themselves, their families, and their staff: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the amount of the Members' Representational Allowance should be 
increased by such amount as is necessary to protect Members of the 
House (including the Delegates and Resident Commissioner to the 
Congress), as well as members of the public who are present when 
Members are in public venues, from increasing threats.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered June 8, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00244-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I.D. AND A.D., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 88200

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal involving the termination of appellant’s 

parental rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4. Before the Court is appellant’s June 7, 

2021 second motion seeking a fourteen-day extension of time to file his brief on 

the merits. The Court previously granted appellant a twenty-day extension. 

Accordingly, we GRANT the motion only to the extent that we extend the time to 

June 17, 2021. We caution appellant that no further extension will be granted. 

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22
- 10494 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Gerardo Valentin**
**- Garcia,**  Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21
- CR
- 202 - 1

**______________________________** Before **Davis, Duncan,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gerardo Valentin
- Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). The defendant has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 12, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10494 Document: 00516608326 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/12/2023No. 22
- 10494

2 appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from furth er responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 22-10494 Document: 00516608326 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/12/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-K
for the year  ended  December  31,  1996 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         3,608
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 12,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                     213
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              16,544
<PP&E>                                           890
<DEPRECIATION>                                   146
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                43,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,532
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        2
<COMMON>                                         127
<OTHER-SE>                                    34,615
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  43,366
<SALES>                                       55,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              55,867
<CGS>                                         47,574
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 53,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (40)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,252
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,352
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,352
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0



</TABLE>