alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employee Benefits Security Administration

          - [Application Number D-11552]

                    In the March 26, 2009 issue of the                     **Federal Register**                    , at 74 FR 13250, the Department of Labor (the Department) published a notice of proposed exemption from the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended and from certain taxes imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The notice of proposed exemption, if granted, would have replaced and modified exemptive relief, previously provided pursuant to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 96-62, for the Applicants' securitization activities, which generally permits employee benefit plans to purchase, hold, sell or exchange certain securities representing interests in asset-backed or mortgage-backed investment pools.                

By e-mail dated June 1, 2009, the Applicants requested that the application for exemption be withdrawn.

Accordingly, the notice of proposed exemption is hereby withdrawn.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of June, 2009.

Ivan L. Strasfeld,

Director, Office of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-15156 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      27,707,850
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         157,507
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 52,072,834
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      51,285,077
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        80,733,959
<LOANS>                                    357,845,513
<ALLOWANCE>                                  5,202,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             528,979,733
<DEPOSITS>                                 414,576,184
<SHORT-TERM>                                15,169,716
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,017,110
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,146,272
<OTHER-SE>                                  86,070,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             528,979,733
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             36,246,226
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            7,572,923
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               208,705
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            44,027,854
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          14,597,921
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          15,459,548
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       28,568,306
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,175,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               3,695
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             14,119,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             21,384,440
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  21,384,440
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,431,187
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.32
<LOANS-NON>                                    728,308
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,898,362
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             4,794,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  849,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    83,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            5,203,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         5,203,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        232,000
        

</TABLE>
#### Joseph Whittaker, Respondent, v Webster Trucking Corp. et al., Appellants.

[823 NYS2d 95]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agate, J.), dated January 21, 2005, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that they failed to establish, prima facie, that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). The affirmed medical reports of the defendants’ examining orthopedic surgeon and neurologist merely noted that the plaintiff had a full range of motion in his cervical spine without setting forth the objective test or tests performed supporting their conclusions *(see Nembhard v Delatorre,*16 AD3d 390 [2005]; *Black v Robinson,*305 AD2d 438 [2003]). Moreover, the defendants’ examining orthopedic surgeon, in his affirmed medical report, also stated that there was a limitation in the range of motion of the plaintiffs lumbar spine but did not sufficiently quantify the limitation to establish the absence of a significant limitation of motion *(see Kaminsky v Waldner,*19 AD3d 370 [2005]). Since the defendants failed to satisfy their prima facie burden, it is unnecessary to consider whether the plaintiffs papers in opposition were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Coscia v 938 Trading Corp.,*283 AD2d 538 [2001]). Florio, J.E, Santucci, Mastro, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00138-CV

Rolando Acevedo, et al. 

v.

The O'Quinn Law Firm, John M. O'Quinn & Associates, LLP, and T. Gerald Treece, as 

Independent Executor of the Estate of John M. O'Quinn, deceased

NO. 392,247-416 IN THE PROBATE COURT NO 2 OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

SUPP CLK RECORD

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

MT FEE

RPT RECORD

MT FEE

MT FEE

RPT RECORD

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING

UNKNOWN

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$13,806.00

$10.00

$161.00

$10.00

$10.00

$792.00

$175.00

$20.00

07/23/2015

06/19/2015

03/17/2015

12/17/2014

09/04/2014

08/06/2014

07/18/2014

05/05/2014

03/26/2014

02/26/2014

02/19/2014

02/18/2014

02/18/2014

UNKNOWN

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

UNK

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$15,024.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment
I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this September 11, 2015.
H. Res. 226 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 9, 2019. 

Resolved, 

SECTION 1. ELECTION OF MEMBERS TO JOINT COMMITTEE OF 

CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY AND JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING. 

(a) JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY.—The following Members are hereby elected to the 

Joint Committee of Congress on the Library, to serve with 

the chair of the Committee on House Administration and the 

chair of the Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch of the 

Committee on Appropriations: 

(1) Mr. Butterfield. 

(2) Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois. 

(3) Mr. Loudermilk. 

(b) JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING.—The following 

Members are hereby elected to the Joint Committee on Printing, to serve with the chair of the Committee on House Administration: 

(1) Mr. Raskin. 
2 

•HRES 226 EH 

(2) Mrs. Davis of California. 

(3) Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois. 

(4) Mr. Loudermilk. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### Madeline Yvonne Tims, Individually and as Court Appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of Zachary Tims, Jr., Deceased, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[975 NYS2d 879]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia Kern, J.), entered December 21, 2011, which denied plaintiff’s motion seeking injunctive relief to bar defendant Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) from disclosing the cause and manner of death of her son, Pastor Zachery Tims, Jr., to the public, and granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment seeking a declaration that OCME may, upon inquiry, *458release the cause and manner of death, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The parties agree that this appeal turns on the meaning of New York City Charter § 557 (g), which concerns records kept by OCME for the City of New York. This statute states that “[t]he chief medical examiner shall keep full and complete records in such form as may be provided by law. The chief medical examiner shall promptly deliver to the appropriate district attorney copies of all records relating to every death as to which there is, in the judgment of the medical examiner in charge, any indication of criminality. Such records shall not be open to public inspection.”

Plaintiff, in seeking to prevent the OCME from releasing the cause and manner of death of her late son, contends that the final sentence of the statute, stating that “[s]uch records shall not be open to public inspection,” modifies the whole paragraph, meaning that no records of the OCME are open to public inspection.

This argument is unavailing. The motion court correctly held that the final sentence modifies its last antecedent (McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 254), providing that records delivered to the Office of the District Attorney due to indicia of criminality are to be kept confidential *(see e.g. Matter of Mitchell v Borakove,*225 AD2d 435 [1st Dept 1996], *appeal dismissed*88 NY2d 919 [1996]; *Matter of Assakaf v Arden,*210 AD2d 325 [2d Dept 1994]; *Matter of Mullady v Bogard,*153 Misc 2d 1018 [Sup Ct, NY County 1992]; *Matter of English v Bohan,*175 Misc 930 [Sup Ct, NY County 1940]), and that this sentence serves as no bar to the OCME releasing, upon public inquiry, the cause and manner of death in the cases it investigates.

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
MTOR-06.30.2013-EX10.D




Exhibit 10-d 




MERITOR HVS AB


 To: 




Viking Asset Purchaser No. 7 IC (the “Purchaser”) 
Citicorp Trustee Company Limited (the “Programme Trustee”) 


10 June 2013 




Dear Sirs, 


Extension of a receivables purchase agreement between the Purchaser, the Programme Trustee and ourselves as Seller dated 28 June 2011 as amended, (the “Receivables Purchase Agreement”). 


We refer to the Receivables Purchase Agreement. We write to record the terms and conditions upon which the parties have agreed to extend the Receivables Purchase Agreement. 


In the definition of Termination Event, sub-clause (a) which appears in Clause 1 of the Receivables Purchase Agreement, the reference to “one (1) year “ shall be replaced by “three (3) years”. 


Please acknowledge your acceptance of the terms and conditions contained in this Letter of Agreement by signing and returning the enclosed duplicate. 


Yours faithfully, 


By:  /s/         Eric Moss




for and on behalf of 
Meritor HVS AB 




We accept the terms and conditions set out in the Letter of Agreement of which the foregoing is the duplicate. 




 
By:   /s/  Stephen Langan
........................... 
for and on behalf of 
Viking Asset Purchaser No. 7 IC 






By:   /s/  David Mares
........................... 
for and on behalf of 
Citicorp Trustee Company Limited
No. 07

- 23

- 00 207

- CV

Global Building, LLC Appellant §

§

§

§ From the 131st District Court

of Bexar County

v. August 9, 2023

Aulukista, LLC, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Global Windcrest II, LLC Appellee Opinion by Justice Yarbrough

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated August 9, 2023 , it is ordered,

adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the trial court is reversed as to Global ’ s

application to compel ar bitration and that a judgment is hereby rendered staying the

underlying litigation, and refer r ing this matter to arbitration in accordance with paragraph

18.22 of the Global Windcrest II, LLC operating agreem ent. It is further ordered,

adj udged

, and decreed that the temporary injunction iss ued by the trial court be

vacated, and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with our opinion.

It is further ordered that appellee pay all costs in this beh alf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
H. Res. 28 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 9, 2019. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House any bill specified in section 2 of this resolution. All points of order against consideration of each such bill are waived. Each such bill shall be 

considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 

each such bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on each such bill and on any amendment 

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 

(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations or their respective designees; and (2) one motion 

to recommit. 

SEC. 2. The bills referred to in the first section of this 

resolution are as follows: 

(a) The bill (H.R. 264) making appropriations for financial services and general government for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019, and for other purposes. 
2 

•HRES 28 EH 

(b) The bill (H.R. 265) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, 

and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending 

September 30, 2019, and for other purposes. 

(c) The bill (H.R. 266) making appropriations for the 

Department of the Interior, environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019, and for 

other purposes. 

(d) The bill (H.R. 267) making appropriations for the 

Department of Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 

September 30, 2019, and for other purposes. 

SEC. 3. The requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for 

a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on 

Rules on the same day it is presented to the House is waived 

with respect to any resolution reported through the legislative 

day of January 15, 2019, relating to a measure making or 

continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-20-0000021

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
OFFSHORE ART, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DRINK ENTERPRISES LLC, a Hawai # i Limited Liability Company; Defendant-Appellant, JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants

A PPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

( CIVIL NO. 2CC181000307(2))

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) On March 6, 2020, the circuit court clerk filed the record on appeal;

(2) On March 9, 2020, the appellate clerk notified the parties that the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief were due on or before March 16, 2020, and April 15, 2020, respectively;

(3) Defendant-Appellant Drink Enterprises LLC (Drink) failed to file either document or request an extension of time;

(4) On May 4, 2020, Plaintiff-Appellee Offshore Art, LLC filed a Notice of Failure to File Jurisdictional Statement and Opening Brief, which the court construes as a motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to file the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief (May 4, 2020 Motion); Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-20-0000021 03-JUN-2020 09:25 AMN O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R 

### (5) Drink did not file a response to the May 4, 2020 Motion; (6) On May 13, 2020, the appellate clerk notified Drink that the time for filing the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on May 26, 2020, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the appeal, under Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and Drink could request relief from default by motion; and

(7) Drink took no further action in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 3, 2020. /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# Date and Time:

 Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 11 a.m.

# Place:

 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# Status:

 This meeting will be closed to the public.

## Items To Be Discussed

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g;

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.;

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration; and

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

* * * * *

# Date and Time:

 Thursday, June 25, 2009, at 10 a.m.

# Place:

 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# Status:

 This meeting will be open to the public.

## Items To Be Discussed

Correction and Approval of Minutes;

Draft Advisory Opinion 2009-07: Representative Randy Neugebauer, by Benjamin L. Ginsberg, and Kathryn Biber Chen;

Draft Advisory Opinion 2009-12: Senator Norm Coleman, by Benjamin Ginsberg, William McGinley, and Kathryn Biber Chen; and 

Final Rule on Civil Penalty Inflation Adjustments. Management and Administrative Matters.

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Mary Dove, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

# Person to Contact for Information:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-14640 Filed 6-18-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
# Encephalitis Lethargica

## What is encephalitis lethargica? 

Encephalitis lethargica is a disease characterized by:
              - High fever
              - Headache
              - Double vision
              - Delayed physical and mental response
              - Lethargy/fatigue

In acute cases, people with the disorder may enter coma. Some also may experience:
              - Abnormal eye movements
              - Upper body weakness
              - Muscular pains
              - Tremors
              - Neck rigidity
              - Behavioral changes including psychosis

The cause of encephalitis lethargica is unknown. An epidemic of encephalitis lethargica occurred from 1917 to 1928, but no recurrence of the epidemic has since been reported. It was possible for Postencephalitic Parkinson's disease to develop after a bout of encephalitis—sometimes as long as a year after the illness.

Treatment for encephalitis lethargica is symptomatic and may include Levodopa and other anti-Parkinson drugs. The course of the disease varies depending upon complications or accompanying disorders.

file-medical

## How can I or my loved one help improve care for people with encephalitis lethargica?

Consider participating in a clinical trial so clinicians and scientists can learn more about encephalitis lethargica and related disorders. Clinical research uses human volunteers to help researchers learn more about a disorder and perhaps find better ways to safely detect, treat, or prevent disease. 

All types of volunteers are needed—those who are healthy or may have an illness or disease—of all different ages, sexes, races, and ethnicities to ensure that study results apply to as many people as possible, and that treatments will be safe and effective for everyone who will use them. 

For information about participating in clinical research visit NIH Clinical Research Trials and You. Learn about clinical trials currently looking for people with encephalitis lethargica at Clinicaltrials.gov.
> Where can I find more information about encephalitis lethargica?
Information may be available from the following resource:

MedlinePlus

book-open