# Patent

## Title
Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants

## Abstract

The invention relates to plant transcription factor polypeptides, polynucleotides that encode them, homologs from a variety of plant species, and methods of using the polynucleotides and polypeptides to produce transgenic plants having advantageous properties compared to a reference plant. Sequence information related to these polynucleotides and polypeptides can also be used in bioinformatic search methods and is also disclosed.

## Background
RELATIONSHIP TO COPENDING APPLICATIONS
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/411,837, filed Sep. 18, 2002 (now expired), U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/434,166, filed Dec. 17, 2002 (now expired), and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/465,809, filed Apr. 24, 2003 (now expired). This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/666,642, filed Sep. 18, 2003 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,196,245). The entire contents of all these applications are hereby incorporated by reference.


JOINT RESEARCH AGREEMENT
The claimed invention, in the field of functional genomics and the characterization of plant genes for the improvement of plants, was made by or on behalf of Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. and Monsanto Company as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement, said agreement having been in effect on or before the date the claimed invention was made.
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to the field of plant biology, and to compositions and methods for modifying the phenotype of a plant.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A plant's traits, such as its biochemical, developmental, or phenotypic characteristics, may be controlled through a number of cellular processes. One important way to manipulate that control is through transcription factors—proteins that influence the expression of a particular gene or sets of genes. Transformed and transgenic plants comprise cells having altered levels of at least one selected transcription factor, and may possess advantageous or desirable traits. Strategies for manipulating traits by altering a plant cell's transcription factor content can therefore result in plants and crops with new and/or improved commercially valuable properties.
Transcription factors can modulate gene expression, either increasing or decreasing (inducing or repressing) the rate of transcription. This modulation results in differential levels of gene expression at various developmental stages, in different tissues and cell types, and in response to different exogenous (e.g., environmental) and endogenous stimuli throughout the life cycle of the organism.
Because transcription factors are key controlling elements of biological pathways, altering the expression levels of one or more transcription factors can change entire biological pathways in an organism. For example, manipulation of the levels of selected transcription factors may result in increased expression of economically useful proteins or biomolecules in plants or improvement in other agriculturally relevant characteristics. Conversely, blocked or reduced expression of a transcription factor may reduce biosynthesis of unwanted compounds or remove an undesirable trait. Therefore, manipulating transcription factor levels in a plant offers tremendous potential in agricultural biotechnology for modifying a plant's traits. A number of the agriculturally relevant characteristics of plants, and desirable traits that may be imbued by modified transcription factor gene expression, are listed below.
Chilling Tolerance
The term “chilling sensitivity” has been used to describe many types of physiological damage produced at low, but above freezing, temperatures. Most crops of tropical origins such as soybean, rice, maize and cotton are easily damaged by chilling. Typical chilling damage includes wilting, necrosis, chlorosis or leakage of ions from cell membranes. The underlying mechanisms of chilling sensitivity are not completely understood yet, but probably involve the level of membrane saturation and other physiological deficiencies. For example, photoinhibition of photosynthesis (disruption of photosynthesis due to high light intensities) often occurs under clear atmospheric conditions subsequent to cold late summer/autumn nights. By some estimates, chilling accounts for monetary losses in the United States (U.S.) second only to drought and flooding. For example, chilling may lead to yield losses and lower product quality through the delayed ripening of maize. Another consequence of poor growth is the rather poor ground cover of maize fields in spring, often resulting in soil erosion, increased occurrence of weeds, and reduced uptake of nutrients. A retarded uptake of mineral nitrogen could also lead to increased losses of nitrate into the ground water.
Freezing Tolerance.
Freezing is a major environmental stress that limits where crops can be grown and that reduces yields considerably, depending on the weather in a particular growing season. In addition to exceptionally stressful years that cause measurable losses of billions of dollars, less extreme stress almost certainly causes smaller yield reductions over larger areas to produce yield reductions of similar dollar value every year. For instance, in the U.S., the 1995 early fall frosts are estimated to have caused losses of over one billion dollars to corn and soybeans. The spring of 1998 saw an estimated $200 M of damages to Georgia alone in the peach, blueberry and strawberry industries. The occasional freezes in Florida have shifted the citrus belt further south due to $100 M or more losses. California sustained $650 M of damage in 1998 to the citrus crop due to a winter freeze. In addition, certain crops such as Eucalyptus, which has the very favorable properties of rapid growth and good wood quality for pulping, are not able to grow in the southeastern states due to occasional freezes.
Inherent winter hardiness of the crop determines in which agricultural areas it can survive the winter. For example, for wheat, the northern central portion of the U.S. has winters that are too cold for good winter wheat crops. Approximately 20% of the U.S. wheat crop is spring wheat, with a market value of $2 billion. Areas growing spring wheat could benefit by growing winter wheat that had increased winter hardiness. Assuming a 25% yield increase when growing winter wheat, this would create $500 M of increased value. Additionally, the existing winter wheat is severely stressed by freezing conditions and should have improved yields with increased tolerance to these stresses. An estimate of the yield benefit of these traits is 10% of the $4.4 billion winter wheat crop in the U.S. or $444 M of yield increase, as well as better survival in extreme freezing conditions that occur periodically.
Thus, plants more resistant to freezing, both midwinter freezing and sudden freezes, would protect a farmers'investment, improve yield and quality, and allow growers in some geographies to grow more profitable and productive crops. Additionally, winter crops such as canola, wheat and barley have 25% to 50% yield increases relative to spring planted varieties of the same crops. This yield increase is due to the “head start” the fall planted crops have over the spring planted crops and their reaching maturity earlier while the temperatures, soil moisture and lack of pathogens provide more favorable conditions.
Salt Tolerance.
One in five hectares of irrigated land is damaged by salt, an important historical factor in the decline of ancient agrarian societies. This condition is only expected to worsen, further reducing the availability of arable land and crop production, since none of the top five food crops—wheat, corn, rice, potatoes, and soybean—can tolerate excessive salt.
Detrimental effects of salt on plants are a consequence of both water deficit resulting in osmotic stress (similar to drought stress) and the effects of excess sodium ions on critical biochemical processes. As with freezing and drought, high saline causes water deficit; the presence of high salt makes it difficult for plant roots to extract water from their environment (Buchanan et al. (2000) in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants, American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, Md.). Soil salinity is thus one of the more important variables that determines where a plant may thrive. In many parts of the world, sizable land areas are uncultivable due to naturally high soil salinity. To compound the problem, salination of soils that are used for agricultural production is a significant and increasing problem in regions that rely heavily on agriculture. The latter is compounded by over-utilization, over-fertilization and water shortage, typically caused by climatic change and the demands of increasing population. Salt tolerance is of particular importance early in a plant's lifecycle, since evaporation from the soil surface causes upward water movement, and salt accumulates in the upper soil layer where the seeds are placed. Thus, germination normally takes place at a salt concentration much higher than the mean salt level in the whole soil profile.
Drought Tolerance.
While much of the weather that we experience is brief and short-lived, drought is a more gradual phenomenon, slowly taking hold of an area and tightening its grip with time. In severe cases, drought can last for many years and can have devastating effects on agriculture and water supplies. With burgeoning population and chronic shortage of available fresh water, drought is not only the number one weather related problem in agriculture, it also ranks as one of the major natural disasters of all time, causing not only economic damage, but also loss of human lives. For example, losses from the U.S. drought of 1988 exceeded $40 billion, exceeding the losses caused by Hurricane Andrew in 1992, the Mississippi River floods of 1993, and the San Francisco earthquake in 1989. In some areas of the world, the effects of drought can be far more severe. In the Horn of Africa the 1984-1985 drought led to a famine that killed 750,000 people.
Problems for plants caused by low water availability include mechanical stresses caused by the withdrawal of cellular water. Drought also causes plants to become more susceptible to various diseases (Simpson (1981) “The Value of Physiological Knowledge of Water Stress in Plants”, In Water Stress on Plants. (Simpson, G. M., Ed), Praeger, N.Y., pp. 235-265).
In addition to the many land regions of the world that are too arid for most if not all crop plants, overuse and over-utilization of available water is resulting in an increasing loss of agriculturally-usable land, a process which, in the extreme, results in desertification. The problem is further compounded by increasing salt accumulation in soils, as described above, which adds to the loss of available water in soils.
Water deficit is a common component of many plant stresses. Water deficit occurs in plant cells when the whole plant transpiration rate exceeds the water uptake. In addition to drought, other stresses, such as salinity and low temperature, produce cellular dehydration (McCue and Hanson (1990) Trends Biotechnol. 8: 358-362).
Salt and drought stress signal transduction consist of ionic and osmotic homeostasis signaling pathways. The ionic aspect of salt stress is signaled via the SOS pathway where a calcium-responsive SOS3-SOS2 protein kinase complex controls the expression and activity of ion transporters such as SOS1. The pathway regulating ion homeostasis in response to salt stress has been reviewed recently by Xiong and Zhu (2002) Plant Cell Environ. 25: 131-139.
The osmotic component of salt stress involves complex plant reactions that overlap with drought and/or cold stress responses.
Common aspects of drought, cold and salt stress response have been reviewed recently by Xiong and Zhu (2002) supra). Those include:

    
    
        (a) transient changes in the cytoplasmic calcium levels very early in the signaling event (Knight, (2000) Int. Rev. Cytol. 195: 269-324; Sanders et al. (1999) Plant Cell 11: 691-706);
        (b) signal transduction via mitogen-activated and/or calcium dependent protein kinases (CDPKs; see Xiong and Zhu (2002) supra) and protein phosphatases (Merlot et al. (2001) Plant J. 25: 295-303; Tähtiharju and Palva (2001) Plant J. 26: 461-470);
        (c) increases in abscisic acid levels in response to stress triggering a subset of responses (Xiong and Zhu (2002) supra, and references therein);
        (d) inositol phosphates as signal molecules (at least for a subset of the stress responsive transcriptional changes (Xiong et al. (2001) Genes Dev. 15: 1971-1984);
        (e) activation of phospholipases which in turn generate a diverse array of second messenger molecules, some of which might regulate the activity of stress responsive kinases (phospholipase D functions in an ABA independent pathway, Frank et al. (2000) Plant Cell 12: 111-124);
        (f) induction of late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) type genes including the CRT/DRE-containing COR/RD genes (Xiong and Zhu (2002) supra);
        (g) increased levels of antioxidants and compatible osmolytes such as proline and soluble sugars (Hasegawa et al. (2000) Annu. Rev. Plant Mol. Plant Physiol. 51: 463-499);
        (h) accumulation of reactive oxygen species such as superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals (Hasegawa et al. (2000) supra).
    
    


Abscisic acid biosynthesis is regulated by osmotic stress at multiple steps. Both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent osmotic stress signaling first modify constitutively expressed transcription factors, leading to the expression of early response transcriptional activators, which then activate downstream stress tolerance effector genes.
Based on the commonality of many aspects of cold, drought and salt stress responses, it can be concluded that genes that increase tolerance to cold or salt stress can also improve drought stress protection. In fact this has already been demonstrated for transcription factors (in the case of AtCBF/DREB1) and for other genes such as OsCDPK7 (Saijo et al. (2000) Plant J. 23: 319-327), or AVP1 (a vacuolar pyrophosphatase-proton-pump; Gaxiola et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98: 11444-11449).
Heat Tolerance.
Germination of many crops is very sensitive to temperature. A transcription factor that would enhance germination in hot conditions would be useful for crops that are planted late in the season or in hot climates. Seedlings and mature plants that are exposed to excess heat may experience heat shock, which may arise in various organs, including leaves and particularly fruit, when transpiration is insufficient to overcome heat stress. Heat also damages cellular structures, including organelles and cytoskeleton, and impairs membrane function (Buchanan, supra).
Heat shock may result a decrease in overall protein synthesis, accompanied by expression of heat shock proteins. Heat shock proteins function as chaperones and are involved in refolding proteins denatured by heat.
Tolerance to Low Nitrogen and Phosphorus.
The ability of all plants to remove nutrients from their environment is essential to survival. Thus, identification of genes that encode polypeptides with transcription factor activity may allow for the generation of transgenic plants that are better able to make use of available nutrients in nutrient-poor environments.
Among the most important macronutrients for plant growth that have the largest impact on crop yield are nitrogenous- and phosphorus-containing compounds. Nitrogen- and phosphorus-containing fertilizers are used intensively in agriculture practices today. An increase in grain crop yields from 0.5 to 1.0 metric tons per hectare to 7 metric tons per hectare accompanied the use of commercial fixed nitrogen fertilizer in production farming (Vance (2001) Plant Physiol 127: 390-397). Given current practices, in order to meet food production demands in years to come, considerable increases in the amount of nitrogen—and phosphorus-containing fertilizers will be required (Vance, supra).
Nitrogen (N) is the most abundant element on earth yet it is one of the most limiting elements to plant growth due to its lack of availability in the soil. Plants obtain N from the soil from several sources including commercial fertilizers, manure and the mineralization of organic matter. The intensive use of N fertilizers in present agricultural practices is problematic, the energy intensive Haber-Bosch process makes N fertilizer and it is estimated that the U.S. uses annually between 3-5% of the nation's natural gas for this process. In addition to the expense of N fertilizer production and the depletion of non-renewable resources, the use of N fertilizers has led to the eutrophication of freshwater ecosystems and the contamination of drinking water due to the runoff of excess fertilizer into ground water supplies.
Phosphorus (P) is second only to N in its importance as a macronutrient for plant growth and to its impact on crop yield. Phosphorus is extremely immobile and not readily available to roots in the soil and is therefore often growth limiting to plants. Inorganic phosphate (Pi) is a constituent of several important molecules required for energy transfer, metabolic regulation and protein activation (Marschner (1995) Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd ed., Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.). Plants have evolved several strategies to help cope with P and N deprivation that include metabolic as well as developmental adaptations. Most, if not all, of these strategies have components that are regulated at the level of transcription and therefore are amenable to manipulation by transcription factors. Metabolic adaptations include increasing the availability of P and N by increasing uptake from the soil though the induction of high affinity and low affinity transporters, and/or increasing P and N mobilization in the plant. Developmental adaptations include increases in primary and secondary roots, increases in root hair number and length, and associations with mycorrhizal fungi (Bates and Lynch (1996) Plant Cell Environ. 19: 529-538; Harrison (1999) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50: 361-389).
Disease Desistance.
Disease management is a significant expense in crop production worldwide. According to EPA reports for 1996 and 1997, U.S. farmers spend approximately $6 billion on fungicides annually. Despite this expenditure, according to a survey conducted by the food and agriculture organization, plant diseases still reduce worldwide crop productivity by 12% and in the United States alone, economic losses due to plant pathogens amounts to 9.1 billion dollars (FAO, 1993). Data from these reports and others demonstrate that despite the availability of chemical control only a small proportion of the losses due to disease can be prevented. Not only are fungicides and anti-bacterial treatments expensive to growers, but their widespread application poses both environmental and health risks. The use of plant biotechnology to engineer disease resistant crops has the potential to make a significant economic impact on agriculture and forestry industries in two ways: reducing the monetary and environmental expense of fungicide application and reducing both pre-harvest and post-harvest crop losses that occur now despite the use of costly disease management practices.
Fungal, bacterial, oomycete, viral, and nematode diseases of plants are ubiquitous and important problems, and often severely impact yield and quality of crop and other plants. A very few examples of diseases of plants include:
Powdery mildew, caused by the fungi Erysiphe, Sphaerotheca, Phyllactinia, Microsphaera, Podosphaera or Uncinula, in, for example, wheat, bean, cucurbit, lettuce, pea, grape, tree fruit crops, as well as roses, phlox, lilacs, grasses, and Euonymus; 
Fusarium-caused diseases such as Fusarium wilt in cucurbits, Fusarium head blight in barley and wheat, wilt and crown and root rot in tomatoes;
Sudden oak death, caused by the oomycete Phytophthora ramorum; this disease was first detected in 1995 in California tan oaks. The disease has since killed more than 100,000 tan oaks, coast live oaks, black oaks, and Shreve's oaks in coastal regions of northern California, and more recently in southwestern Oregon (Roach (2001) National Geographic News, Dec. 6, 2001);
Black Sigatoka, a fungal disease caused by Mycosphaerella species that attacks banana foliage, is spreading throughout the regions of the world that are responsible for producing most of the world's banana crop;
Eutypa dieback, caused by Eutypa lata, affects a number of crop plants, including vine grape. Eutypa dieback delays shoot emergence, and causes chlorosis, stunting, and tattering of leaves;
Pierce's disease, caused by the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa, precludes growth of grapes in the southeastern United States, and threatens the profitable wine grape industry in northern California. The bacterium clogs the vasculature of the grapevines, resulting in foliar scorching followed by slow death of the vines. There is no known treatment for Pierce's disease;
Bacterial Spot caused by the bacterium Xanthomonas campestris causes serious disease problems on tomatoes and peppers. It is a significant problem in the Florida tomato industry because it spreads rapidly, especially in warm periods where there is wind-driven rain. Under these conditions, there are no adequate control measures;
Diseases caused by viruses of the family Geminiviridae are a growing agricultural problem worldwide. Geminiviruses have caused severe crop losses in tomato, cassava, and cotton. For instance, in the 1991-1992 growing season in Florida, geminiviruses caused $140 million in damages to the tomato crop (Moffat (1991) Science 286: 1835). Geminiviruses have the ability to recombine between strains to produce new virulent varieties rapidly. Therefore, there is a pressing need for broad-spectrum geminivirus control;
The soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines, causes stunting and chlorosis of soybean plants, which results in yield losses or plant death from severe infestation. Annual losses in the United States have been estimated at $1.5 billion (University of Minnesota Extension Service).
The aforementioned pathogens represent a very small fraction of diverse species that seriously affect plant health and yield. For a more complete description of numerous plant diseases, see, for example, Vidhyasekaran (1997), Fungal Pathogenesis in Plants and Crops: Molecular Biology and Host Defense Mechanisms, Marcel Dekker, Monticello, N.Y.), or Agrios (1997, Plant Pathology, Academic Press, New York, N.Y.). Plants that are able to resist disease may produce significantly higher yields and improved food quality. It is thus of considerable importance to find genes that reduce or prevent disease.
Reduced Shade Avoidance.
Shade avoidance describes the process in which plants grown in close proximity attempt to out-compete each other by increasing stem length at the expense of leaf, fruit and storage organ development. This is caused by the plant's response to far-red radiation reflected from leaves of neighboring plants, which is mediated by phytochrome photoreceptors. Close proximity to other plants, as is produced in high-density crop plantings, increases the relative proportion of far-red irradiation, and therefore induces the shade avoidance response. Shade avoidance adversely affects biomass and yield, particularly when leaves, fruits or other storage organs constitute the desired crop (see, for example, Smith (1982) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33: 481-518; Ballare et al. (1990) Science 247: 329-332; Smith (1995) Annu. Dev. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol., 46: 289-315; and Schmitt et al. (1995), American Naturalist, 146: 937-953). Alteration of the shade avoidance response in tobacco through alteration of phytochrome levels has been shown to produce an increase in harvest index (leaf biomass/total biomass) at high planting density, which would result in higher yield (Robson et al. (1996) Nature Biotechnol. 14: 995-998).
Altered Flowering Time and Flowering Control.
Timing of flowering has a significant impact on production of agricultural products. For example, varieties with different flowering responses to environmental cues are necessary to adapt crops to different production regions or systems. Such a range of varieties have been developed for many crops, including wheat, corn, soybean, and strawberry. Improved methods for alteration of flowering time will facilitate the development of new, geographically adapted varieties.
Breeding programs for the development of new varieties can be limited by the seed-to-seed cycle. Thus, breeding new varieties of plants with multi-year cycles (such as biennials, e.g. carrot, or fruit trees, such as citrus) can be very slow. With respect to breeding programs, there would be a significant advantage in having commercially valuable plants that exhibit controllable and modified periods to flowering (“flowering times”). For example, accelerated flowering would shorten crop and tree breeding programs.
Improved flowering control allows more than one planting and harvest of a crop to be made within a single season. Early flowering would also improve the time to harvest plants in which the flower portion of the plant constitutes the product (e.g., broccoli, cauliflower, and other edible flowers). In addition, chemical control of flowering through induction or inhibition of flowering in plants could offer a significant advantage to growers who could provide for more uniform fruit production (e.g., in strawberry) A sizable number of plants for which the vegetative portion of the plant forms the valuable crop tend to “bolt” dramatically (e.g., spinach, onions, lettuce), after which biomass production declines and product quality diminishes (e.g., through flowering-triggered senescence of vegetative parts). Delay or prevention of flowering may also reduce or preclude dissemination of pollen from transgenic plants.
Increased Size and Biomass.
The ability to increase the biomass or size of a plant would have several important commercial applications. Crop species may be generated that produce higher yields on larger cultivars, particularly those in which the vegetative portion of the plant is edible. For example, increasing plant leaf biomass may increase the yield of leafy vegetables for human or animal consumption. Additionally, increasing leaf biomass can be used to increase production of plant-derived pharmaceutical or industrial products. By increasing plant biomass, increased production levels of the products may be obtained from the plants. Tobacco leaves, in particular, have been employed as plant factories to generate such products. Furthermore, it may be desirable to increase crop yields of plants by increasing total plant photosynthesis. An increase in total plant photosynthesis is typically achieved by increasing leaf area of the plant. Additional photosynthetic capacity may be used to increase the yield derived from particular plant tissue, including the leaves, roots, fruits or seed. In addition, the ability to modify the biomass of the leaves may be useful for permitting the growth of a plant under decreased light intensity or under high light intensity. Modification of the biomass of another tissue, such as roots, may be useful to improve a plant's ability to grow under harsh environmental conditions, including drought or nutrient deprivation, because the roots may grow deeper into the ground. Increased biomass can also be a consequence of some strategies for increased tolerance to stresses, such as drought stress. Early in a stress response plant growth (e.g., expansion of lateral organs, increase in stem girth, etc.) can be slowed to enable the plant to activate adaptive responses. Growth rate that is less sensitive to stress-induced control can result in enhanced plant size, particularly later in development.
For some ornamental plants, the ability to provide larger varieties would be highly desirable. For many plants, including fruit-bearing trees, trees that are used for lumber production, or trees and shrubs that serve as view or wind screens, increased stature provides improved benefits in the forms of greater yield or improved screening.
Because increased yield may be quite valuable to growers, we believe that there is significant commercial opportunity for engineering pathogen tolerance or resistance using a transgenic plants with altered expression of the instant plant transcription factors. Crops so engineered will provide higher yields, and may be used to improve the appearance of ornamentals. The present invention satisfies a need in the art by providing new compositions that are useful for engineering plants with increased biomass or size, and having the potential to increase yield.
Modified Growth Gate.
For almost all commercial crops, it is desirable to use plants that establish more quickly, since seedlings and young plants are particularly susceptible to stress conditions such as salinity or disease. Since many weeds may outgrow young crops or out-compete them for nutrients, it would also be desirable to determine means for allowing young crop plants to out compete weed species. Increasing seedling growth rate (emergence) contributes to seedling vigor and allows for crops to be planted earlier in the season with less concern for losses due to environmental factors. Early planting helps add days to the critical grain-filling period and increases yield.
Providing means to speed up or slow down plant growth would also be desirable to ornamental horticulture. If such means be provided, slow growing plants may exhibit prolonged pollen-producing or fruiting period, thus improving fertilization or extending harvesting season.
Modified Senescence and Cell Death.
Premature senescence, triggered by various plant stresses, can limit production of both leaf biomass and seed yield. Transcription factor genes that suppress premature senescence or cell death in response to stresses can provide means for increasing yield, particularly for those plants for which the vegetative part of the plant represents the commercial product (e.g., spinach, lettuce).
Although leaf senescence is thought to be an evolutionary adaptation to recycle nutrients, the ability to control senescence in an agricultural setting has significant value. For example, a delay in leaf senescence in some maize hybrids is associated with a significant increase in yields and a delay of a few days in the senescence of soybean plants can have a large impact on yield. In an experimental setting, tobacco plants engineered to inhibit leaf senescence had a longer photosynthetic lifespan, and produced a 50% increase in dry weight and seed yield (Gan and Amasino (1995) Science 270: 1986-1988). Delayed flower senescence may generate plants that retain their blossoms longer and this may be of potential interest to the ornamental horticulture industry, and delayed foliar and fruit senescence could improve post-harvest shelf-life of produce.
Further, programmed cell death plays a role in other plant responses, including the resistance response to disease, and some symptoms of diseases, for example, as caused by necrotrophic pathogens such as Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Dickman et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 98: 6957-6962). Localized senescence and/or cell death can be used by plants to contain the spread of harmful microorganisms. A specific localized cell death response, the “hypersensitive response”, is a component of race-specific disease resistance mediated by plant resistance genes. The hypersensitive response is thought to help limit pathogen growth and to initiate a signal transduction pathway that leads to the induction of systemic plant defenses. Accelerated senescence may be a defense against obligate pathogens such as powdery mildew that rely on healthy plant tissue for nutrients. With regard to powdery mildew, Botrytis cinerea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and other pathogens, transcription factors that ameliorate cell death and/or damage may reduce the significant economic losses encountered, such as, for example, Botrytis cinerea in strawberry and grape.
Altered Sugar Sensing
Sugars are key regulatory molecules that affect diverse processes in higher plants including germination, growth, flowering, senescence, sugar metabolism and photosynthesis. Sucrose, for example, is the major transport form of photosynthate and its flux through cells has been shown to affect gene expression and alter storage compound accumulation in seeds (source-sink relationships). Glucose-specific hexose-sensing has also been described in plants and is implicated in cell division and repression of “famine” genes (photosynthetic or glyoxylate cycles).
Altered Morphology
Trichomes are branched or unbranched epidermal outgrowths or hair structures on a plant. Trichomes produce a variety of secondary biochemicals such as diterpenes and waxes, the former being important as, for example, insect pheromones, and the latter as protectants against desiccation and herbivorous pests. Since diterpenes also have commercial value as flavors, aromas, pesticides and cosmetics, and potential value as anti-tumor agents and inflammation-mediating substances, they have been both products and the target of considerable research. In most cases where the metabolic pathways are impossible to engineer, increasing trichome density or size on leaves may be the only way to increase plant productivity. Thus, it would be advantageous to discover trichome-affecting transcription factor genes for the purpose of increasing trichome density, size, or type to produce plants that are better protected from insects or that yield higher amounts of secondary metabolites.
The ability to manipulate wax composition, amount, or distribution could modify plant tolerance to drought and low humidity or resistance to insects, as well as plant appearance. In particular, a possible application for a transcription factor gene that reduces wax production in sunflower seed coats would be to reduce fouling during seed oil processing. Antisense or co-suppression of transcription factors involved in wax biosynthesis in a tissue specific manner can be used to specifically alter wax composition, amount, or distribution in those plants and crops from which wax is either a valuable attribute or product or an undesirable constituent of plants.
In many instances, the seeds of a plant constitute a valuable crop. These include, for example, the seeds of many legumes, nuts and grains. The discovery of means for producing larger seed would provide significant value by bringing about an increase in crop yield.
Modifications to flower structure may have advantageous or deleterious effects on fertility, and could be used, for example, to decrease fertility by the absence, reduction or screening of reproductive components. This could be a desirable trait, as it could be exploited to prevent or minimize the escape of the pollen of genetically modified organisms into the environment.
Manipulation of inflorescence branching patterns may also be used to influence yield and offer the potential for more effective harvesting techniques. For example, a “self pruning” mutation of tomato results in a determinate growth pattern and facilitates mechanical harvesting (Pnueli et al. (2001) Plant Cell 13(12): 2687-2702).
Other morphological characteristics that may be desirable in plants include those of an ornamental nature. These include changes in seed color, overall color, leaf and flower shape, leaf color, leaf size, or glossiness of leaves. Changes in plant or plant part coloration, brought about by modifying, for example, anthocyanin levels, would provide novel morphological features.
Plants that produce dark leaves may have benefits for human health; flavonoids, for example, have been used to inhibit tumor growth, prevent of bone loss, and prevention lipid oxidation in animals and humans. Plants in which leaf size is increased would likely provide greater biomass, which would be particularly valuable for crops in which the vegetative portion of the plant constitutes the product. Plants with glossy leaves generally produce greater epidermal wax, which, if it could be augmented, resulted in a pleasing appearance for many ornamentals, help prevent desiccation, and resist herbivorous insects and disease-causing agents. Plants with altered inflorescence, including, for example, larger flowers or distinctive floral configurations, may have high value in the ornamental horticulture industry.
Alterations of apical dominance or plant architecture could create new plant varieties. Dwarf plants may be of potential interest to the ornamental horticulture industry, and shorter, more bushy plants may also have increased resistance to lodging.
Altered Seed Oil
The composition of seeds, particularly with respect to seed oil quantity and/or composition, is very important for the nutritional value and production of various food and feed products. Desirable improvements to oils include enhanced heat stability, improved nutritional quality through, for example, reducing the number of calories in seed, increasing the number of calories in animal feeds, or altering the ratio of saturated to unsaturated lipids comprising the oils.
Altered Seed Protein
As with seed oils, seed protein content and composition is very important for the nutritional value and production of various food and feed products. Altered protein content or concentration in seeds may be used to provide nutritional benefits and may also prolong storage capacity, increase seed pest or disease resistance, or modify germination rates. Altered amino acid composition of seeds, through altered protein composition, is also a desired objective for nutritional improvement.
Altered Prenyl Lipids.
Prenyl lipids, including the tocopherols, play a role in anchoring proteins in membranes or membranous organelles. Tocopherols have both anti-oxidant and vitamin E activity. Modified tocopherol composition of plants may thus be useful in improving membrane integrity and function, which may mitigate abiotic stresses such as heat stress. Increasing the anti-oxidant and vitamin content of plants through increased tocopherol content can provide useful human health benefits.
Altered Glucosinolate Levels
Increases or decreases in specific glucosinolates or total glucosinolate content can be desirable depending upon the particular application. For example: (i) glucosinolates are undesirable components of the oilseeds used in animal feed, since they produce toxic effects; low-glucosinolate varieties of canola have been developed to combat this problem; (ii) some glucosinolates have anti-cancer activity; thus, increasing the levels or composition of these compounds can be of use in production of nutraceuticals; and (iii) glucosinolates form part of a plant's natural defense against insects; modification of glucosinolate composition or quantity could therefore afford increased protection from herbivores. Furthermore, tissue specific promoters can be used in edible crops to ensure that these compounds accumulate specifically in particular tissues, such as the epidermis, which are not taken for human consumption.
We have identified polynucleotides encoding transcription factors, developed numerous transgenic plants using these polynucleotides, and have analyzed the plants for a variety of important traits. In so doing, we have identified important polynucleotide and polypeptide sequences for producing commercially valuable plants and crops as well as the methods for making them and using them. Other aspects and embodiments of the invention are described below and can be derived from the teachings of this disclosure as a whole.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to novel recombinant polynucleotides, transgenic plants comprising the polynucleotides, and methods for producing the transgenic plants.
The recombinant polynucleotides may include any of the following sequences:

    
    
        (a) the nucleotide sequences found in the sequence listing;
        (b) nucleotide sequences encoding polypeptides found in the sequence listing;
        (c) sequence variants that are at least 70% sequence identical to any of the nucleotide sequences of (a) or (b);
        (d) orthologous and paralogous nucleotide sequences that are at least 70% identical to any of the nucleotide sequences of (a) or (b);
        (e) nucleotide sequence that hybridize to any of the nucleotide sequences of (a) or (b) under stringent conditions, which may include, for example, hybridization with wash steps of 6×SSC and 65 C for ten to thirty minutes per step; and
        (f) nucleotide sequences encoding a polypeptide having a conserved domain required for the function of regulating transcription and altering a trait in a transgenic plant, the conserved domain being at least 70% identical with a conserved domain of a polypeptide of the invention (i.e., a polypeptide listed in the sequence listing, or encoded by any of the above nucleotide sequences).
    
    


The invention also pertains to transgenic plants that may be produced by transforming plants with any recombinant polynucleotide of the invention. Due to the function of these polynucleotides, the transgenic plant will become altered phenotypically when compared with a wild-type plant. The traits that may be altered by transforming a plant with one of the present polynucleotides are numerous and varied, and may include, for example:
increased tolerance to various abiotic stresses, including cold, heat, freezing, low nitrogen and phosphorus conditions, osmotic stresses such as drought, and high salt concentrations;
increased tolerance to disease, including fungal disease, and particularly Erysiphe, Fusarium, and Botrytis; the present polynucleotides may be used to confer increased tolerance to multiple pathogens in transformed plants;
altered sensitivity or resistance to treatments that include glyphosate, ABA, and ACC, altered carbon/nitrogen (C/N) sensing;
advanced or delayed flowering time;
altered floral characteristics such as flower structure, loss of flower determinacy, or reduced fertility;
altered shoot meristem development, altered stem morphology and vascular tissue structure, and altered branching patterns;
reduced apical dominance;
altered trichome density, development, or structure;
altered root development, including root mass, branching and root hairs;
altered shade avoidance;
altered seed characteristics such as size, oil content, protein content, development, ripening, germination, or prenyl lipid content;
altered leaf characteristics, including size, mass, shape, color, glossiness, prenyl lipid content and other chemical modifications;
slower or faster growth than wild-type;
altered cell differentiation, proliferation, and expansion;
altered phase change;
altered senescence, programmed cell death and necrosis, increased plant size and/or biomass, including larger seedlings than controls; dwarfed plants; and
altered pigment, including anthocyanin, levels, in various plant tissues.
Methods for producing transgenic plants having altered traits are also encompassed by the invention. These method steps include first providing an expression vector having a recombinant polynucleotide of the invention, and at least one regulatory element flanking the polynucleotide sequence Generally, the regulatory element(s) control expression of the recombinant polynucleotide in a target plant. The expression vector is then introduced into plant cells. The plant cells are grown into plants, which are allowed to overexpress a polypeptide encoded by the recombinant polynucleotide. This overexpression results in the trait alteration, in the plant. Those plants that have altered traits are identified and selected on the basis of the desirability and degree of the altered trait.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEQUENCE LISTING AND FIGURES
The file of this patent contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Patent and Trademark Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
The Sequence Listing provides exemplary polynucleotide and polypeptide sequences of the invention. The traits associated with the use of the sequences are included in the Examples.
CD-ROM1 (Copy 1) is a read-only memory computer-readable compact disc and contains a copy of the Sequence Listing in ASCII text format. The Sequence Listing is named “MB10054.ST25.txt” and is 4,193 kilobytes in size. The copies of the Sequence Listing on the CD-ROM disc are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
CD-ROM2 (Copy 2) is an exact copy of CD-R1 (Copy 1). CD-ROM3 contains a computer-readable format (CRF) copy of the Sequence Listing as a text (.txt) file.
FIG. 1 shows a conservative estimate of phylogenetic relationships among the orders of flowering plants (modified from Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998) Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 84: 1-49). Those plants with a single cotyledon (monocots) are a monophyletic clade nested within at least two major lineages of dicots; the eudicots are further divided into rosids and asterids. Arabidopsis is a rosid eudicot classified within the order Brassicales; rice is a member of the monocot order Poales. FIG. 1 was adapted from Daly et al. ((2001) Plant Physiol. 127: 1328-1333).
FIG. 2 shows a phylogenic dendogram depicting phylogenetic relationships of higher plant taxa, including clades containing tomato and Arabidopsis; adapted from Ku et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 9121-9126; and Chase et al. (1993) Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 528-580.
FIG. 3A illustrates an example of an osmotic stress assay. The medium used in this root growth assay contained polyethylene glycol (PEG). After germination, the seedlings of a 35S::G47 overexpressing line (the eight seedlings on left labeled “OE.G47-22”) appeared larger and had more root growth than the four wild-type seedlings on the right. As would be predicted by the osmotic stress assay, G47 plants showed enhanced survival and drought tolerance in a soil-based drought assay, as did G2133,a paralog of G47 (see FIGS. 10A and 10B). FIG. 3B also demonstrates an interesting effect of G47 overexpression; the 35S::G47 plants on the left and in the center of this photograph had short, thick, fleshy inflorescences with reduced apical dominance.
FIG. 4 demonstrates an example of the effects of an altered response to light. In a germination assay conducted on MS medium in darkness, overexpression of G354 resulted in more open and greenish cotyledons and thick hypocotyls compared to wild type (G354 overexpressors are labeled “G354-29” and wild-type “WT” in this figure). G354 overexpressors also had a drought-tolerance phenotype, as indicated in Example VIII, below. Closely related paralogs of this gene, G353 and G2839, showed a osmotic stress tolerance phenotype in a germination assay on media containing high sucrose. One line of 35S::G353 seedlings and several lines of 35S::G2839 were greener and had higher germination rates than controls. This suggests that G354 and its paralogs G353 and G2839 influence osmotic stress responses.
FIG. 5A is a photograph of Arabidopsis 35S::G1274 seedlings grown on low nitrogen media supplemented with sucrose plus glutamine. Seedlings of two overexpressing lines are present on this plate (not distinguished), and both lines contained less anthocyanin than the wild-type seedlings seen in FIG. 5B. The lack of anthocyanin production indicated that these lines were less stressed than control seedlings under the same conditions, a fact later confirmed in soil-based drought assays showing enhanced drought tolerance by G1274 overexpressing lines. G1274 overexpression (FIG. 5C) and wild-type (FIG. 5D) germination was also compared in a cold germination assay, in which the overexpressors were found to be larger and greener than the controls.
FIGS. 6A-6D compare soil-based drought assays for G1274 overexpressors and wild-type control plants, which confirms the results predicted after the performance of the plate-based osmotic stress assays. 35S::G1274 lines fared much better after a period of water deprivation (FIG. 6A) than control plants (FIG. 6B). This distinction was particularly evident in the overexpressor plants after being ministered with water, said plants recovering to a healthy and vigorous state, as shown in FIG. 6C. Conversely, none of the wild-type plants seen in FIG. 6D recovered after rewatering.
FIGS. 7A and 7B compare G1792 overexpressing Arabidopsis seedling growth on a single plate (two sectors of the same plate) with medium containing 3% sucrose medium lacking nitrogen, five days after planting The 35S::G1792 lines seen in FIG. 7A generally showed greater cotyledon expansion and root growth than the wild-type seedlings in FIG. 7B. FIG. 7C is a photograph of a single plate showing a G1792 overexpressing line (labeled G1792-12; on left) and wild-type plants (on right) five days after inoculation with Botrytis cinerea, showing the chlorosis and hyphal growth in the latter control plants but not in the former overexpressors. Similar results were obtained five days after inoculation with Erysiphe orontii (not shown ) and with Fusarium oxysporum, as seen in FIG. 7D, with control plants on the right showing chlorosis, and G1792 overexpressors on the left appearing to be free of the adverse effects of infection.
FIG. 8A illustrates the results of root growth assays with G2999 overexpressing seedlings and controls in a high sodium chloride medium. The eight 35S::G2999 Arabidopsis seedlings on the left were larger, greener, and had more root growth than the four control seedlings on the right. Another member of the G2999 clade, G2998, also showed a salt tolerance phenotype and performed similarly in the plate-based salt stress assay seen FIG. 8B. In the latter assay 35S::G2998 seedlings appeared large and green, whereas wild-type seedlings in the control assay plate shown in FIG. 8C were small and had not yet expanded their cotyledons. As is noted below, high sodium chloride growth assays often are used to indicate osmotic stress tolerance such as drought tolerance, which was subsequently confirmed with soil-based assays conducted with G2999-overexpressing plants.
FIG. 9A shows the effects of a heat assay on Arabidopsis wild-type and G3086-overexpressing plants. Generally, the overexpressors on the left were larger, paler, and bolted earlier than the wild type plants seen on the right in this plate. The same G3086 overexpressing lines, as exemplified by the eight seedlings on the left of FIG. 9B, were also found to be larger, greener, and had more root growth in a high salt root growth assay than control plants, including the four on the right in FIG. 9B.
FIGS. 10A and 10B compare the recovery from a drought treatment in two lines of G2133 overexpressing Arabidopsis plants and wild-type controls. FIG. 10A shows plants of 35S::G2133 line 5 (left) and control plants (right). FIG. 10B shows plants of 35S::G2133 line 3 (left) and control plants (right). Each pot contained several plants grown under 24 hours light. All were deprived of water for eight days, and are shown after re-watering. All of the plants of the G2133 overexpressor lines recovered, and all of the control plants were either dead or severely and adversely affected by the drought treatment.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
In an important aspect, the present invention relates to polynucleotides and polypeptides, for example, for modifying phenotypes of plants. Throughout this disclosure, various information sources are referred to and/or are specifically incorporated. The information sources include scientific journal articles, patent documents, textbooks, and World Wide Web browser-inactive page addresses, for example. While the reference to these information sources clearly indicates that they can be used by one of skill in the art, each and every one of the information sources cited herein are specifically incorporated in their entirety, whether or not a specific mention of “incorporation by reference” is noted. The contents and teachings of each and every one of the information sources can be relied on and used to make and use embodiments of the invention.
It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, a reference to “a plant” includes a plurality of such plants, and a reference to “a stress” is a reference to one or more stresses and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth.
The polynucleotide sequences of the invention encode polypeptides that are members of well-known transcription factor families, including plant transcription factor families, as disclosed in Tables 4-9. Generally, the transcription factors encoded by the present sequences are involved in cell differentiation and proliferation and the regulation of growth. Accordingly, one skilled in the art would recognize that by expressing the present sequences in a plant, one may change the expression of autologous genes or induce the expression of introduced genes. By affecting the expression of similar autologous sequences in a plant that have the biological activity of the present sequences, or by introducing the present sequences into a plant, one may alter a plant's phenotype to one with improved traits. The sequences of the invention may also be used to transform a plant and introduce desirable traits not found in the wild-type cultivar or strain. Plants may then be selected for those that produce the most desirable degree of over- or under-expression of target genes of interest and coincident trait improvement.
The sequences of the present invention may be from any species, particularly plant species, in a naturally occurring form or from any source whether natural, synthetic, semi-synthetic or recombinant. The sequences of the invention may also include fragments of the present amino acid sequences. In this context, a “fragment” refers to a fragment of a polypeptide sequence which is at least 5 to about 15 amino acids in length, most preferably at least 14 amino acids, and which retain some biological activity of a transcription factor. Where “amino acid sequence” is recited to refer to an amino acid sequence of a naturally occurring protein molecule, “amino acid sequence” and like terms are not meant to limit the amino acid sequence to the complete native amino acid sequence associated with the recited protein molecule.
As one of ordinary skill in the art recognizes, transcription factors can be identified by the presence of a region or domain of structural similarity or identity to a specific consensus sequence or the presence of a specific consensus DNA-binding site or DNA-binding site motif (see, for example, Riechmann et al. (2000) Science 290: 2105-2110). The plant transcription factors may belong to one of the following transcription factor families: the AP2 (APETALA2) domain transcription factor family (Riechmann and Meyerowitz (1998) Biol. Chem. 379: 633-646); the MYB transcription factor family (ENBib; Martin and Paz-Ares (1997) Trends Genet. 13: 67-73); the MADS domain transcription factor family (Riechmann and Meyerowitz (1997) Biol. Chem. 378: 1079-1101); the WRKY protein family (Ishiguro and Nakamura (1994) Mol. Gen. Genet. 244: 563-571); the ankyrin-repeat protein family (Zhang et al. (1992) Plant Cell 4: 1575-1588); the zinc finger protein (Z) family (Klug and Schwabe (1995) FASEB J. 9: 597-604); Takatsuji (1998) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 54:582-596); the homeobox (HB) protein family (Buerglin (1994) in Guidebook to the Homeobox Genes, Duboule (ed.) Oxford University Press); the CAAT-element binding proteins (Forsburg and Guarente (1989) Genes Dev. 3: 1166-1178); the squamosa promoter binding proteins (SPB) (Klein et al. (1996) Mol. Gen. Genet. 1996 250: 7-16); the NAM protein family (Souer et al. (1996) Cell 85: 159-170); the IAA/AUX proteins (Abel et al. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 251: 533-549); the HLH/MYC protein family (Littlewood et al. (1994) Prot. Profile 1: 639-709); the DNA-binding protein (DBP) family (Tucker et al. (1994) EMBO J. 13: 2994-3002); the bZIP family of transcription factors (Foster et al. (1994) FASEB J. 8: 192-200); the Box P-binding protein (the BPF-1) family (da Costa e Silva et al. (1993) Plant J. 4: 125-135); the high mobility group (HMG) family (Bustin and Reeves (1996) Prog. Nucl. Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 54: 35-100); the scarecrow (SCR) family (Di Laurenzio et al. (1996) Cell 86: 423-433); the GF14 family (Wu et al. (1997) Plant Physiol. 114: 1421-1431); the polycomb (PCOMB) family (Goodrich et al. (1997) Nature 386: 44-51); the teosinte branched (TEO) family (Luo et al. (1996) Nature 383: 794-799); the ABI3 family (Giraudat et al. (1992) Plant Cell 4: 1251-1261); the triple helix (TH) family (Dehesh et al. (1990) Science 250: 1397-1399); the EIL family (Chao et al. (1997) Cell 89: 113344); the AT-HOOK family (Reeves and Nissen (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265: 8573-8582); the S1FA family (Zhou et al. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 1165-1169); the bZIPT2 family (Lu and Ferl (1995) Plant Physiol. 109: 723); the Y ABBY family (Bowman et al. (1999) Development 126: 2387-96); the PAZ family (Bohmert et al. (1998) EMBO J. 17: 170-80); a family of miscellaneous (MISC) transcription factors including the DPBF family (Kim et al. (1997) Plant J. 11: 1237-1251) and the SPF1 family (Ishiguro and Nakamura (1994) Mol. Gen. Genet. 244: 563-571); the GARP family (Hall et al. (1998) Plant Cell 10: 925-936), the TUBBY family (Boggin et al (1999) Science 286: 2119-2125), the heat shock family (Wu (1995) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 11: 441-469), the ENBP family (Christiansen et al. (1996) Plant Mol. Biol. 32: 809-821), the RING-zinc family (Jensen et al. (1998) FEBS Letters 436: 283-287), the PDBP family (Janik et al. (1989) Virology 168: 320-329), the PCF family (Cubas et al. Plant J. (1999) 18: 215-22), the SRS (SHI-related) family (Fridborg et al. (1999) Plant Cell 11: 1019-1032), the CPP (cysteine-rich polycomb-like) family (Cvitanich et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 8163-8168), the ARF (auxin response factor) family (Ulmasov et al. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 5844-5849), the SWI/SNF family (Collingwood et al. (1999) J. Mol. Endocrinol. 23: 255-275), the ACBF family (Seguin et al. (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 35: 281-291), PCGL (CG-1 like) family (da Costa e Silva et al. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 921-924) the ARID family (Vazquez et al. (1999) Development 126: 733-742), the Jumonji family (Balciunas et al. (2000), Trends Biochem. Sci. 25: 274-276), the bZIP-NIN family (Schauser et al. (1999) Nature 402: 191-195), the E2F family (Kaelin et al. (1992) Cell 70: 351-364) and the GRF-like family (Knaap et al. (2000) Plant Physiol. 122: 695-704). As indicated by any part of the list above and as known in the art, transcription factors have been sometimes categorized by class, family, and sub-family according to their structural content and consensus DNA-binding site motif, for example. Many of the classes and many of the families and sub-families are listed here. However, the inclusion of one sub-family and not another, or the inclusion of one family and not another, does not mean that the invention does not encompass polynucleotides or polypeptides of a certain family or sub-family. The list provided here is merely an example of the types of transcription factors and the knowledge available concerning the consensus sequences and consensus DNA-binding site motifs that help define them as known to those of skill in the art (each of the references noted above are specifically incorporated herein by reference). A transcription factor may include, but is not limited to, any polypeptide that can activate or repress transcription of a single gene or a number of genes. This polypeptide group includes, but is not limited to, DNA-binding proteins, DNA-binding protein binding proteins, protein kinases, protein phosphatases, protein methyltransferases, GTP-binding proteins, and receptors, and the like.
In addition to methods for modifying a plant phenotype by employing one or more polynucleotides and polypeptides of the invention described herein, the polynucleotides and polypeptides of the invention have a variety of additional uses. These uses include their use in the recombinant production (i.e., expression) of proteins; as regulators of plant gene expression, as diagnostic probes for the presence of complementary or partially complementary nucleic acids (including for detection of natural coding nucleic acids); as substrates for further reactions, e.g., mutation reactions, PCR reactions, or the like; as substrates for cloning e.g., including digestion or ligation reactions; and for identifying exogenous or endogenous modulators of the transcription factors.
Definitions
“Nucleic acid molecule” refers to a oligonucleotide, polynucleotide or any fragment thereof. It may be DNA or RNA of genomic or synthetic origin, double-stranded or single-stranded, and combined with carbohydrate, lipids, protein, or other materials to perform a particular activity such as transformation or form a useful composition such as a peptide nucleic acid (PNA).
“Polynucleotide” is a nucleic acid molecule comprising a plurality of polymerized nucleotides, e.g., at least about 15 consecutive polymerized nucleotides, optionally at least about 30 consecutive nucleotides, at least about 50 consecutive nucleotides. A polynucleotide may be a nucleic acid, oligonucleotide, nucleotide, or any fragment thereof. In many instances, a polynucleotide comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide (or protein) or a domain or fragment thereof. Additionally, the polynucleotide may comprise a promoter, an intron, an enhancer region, a polyadenylation site, a translation initiation site, 5′ or 3′ untranslated regions, a reporter gene, a selectable marker, or the like. The polynucleotide can be single stranded or double stranded DNA or RNA. The polynucleotide optionally comprises modified bases or a modified backbone. The polynucleotide can be, e.g., genomic DNA or RNA, a transcript (such as an mRNA), a cDNA, a PCR product, a cloned DNA, a synthetic DNA or RNA, or the like. The polynucleotide can be combined with carbohydrate, lipids, protein, or other materials to perform a particular activity such as transformation or form a useful composition such as a peptide nucleic acid (PNA). The polynucleotide can comprise a sequence in either sense or antisense orientations. “Oligonucleotide” is substantially equivalent to the terms amplimer, primer, oligomer, element, target, and probe and is preferably single stranded.
“Gene” or “gene sequence” refers to the partial or complete coding sequence of a gene, its complement, and its 5′ or 3′ untranslated regions. A gene is also a functional unit of inheritance, and in physical terms is a particular segment or sequence of nucleotides along a molecule of DNA (or RNA, in the case of RNA viruses) involved in producing a polypeptide chain. The latter may be subjected to subsequent processing such as splicing and folding to obtain a functional protein or polypeptide. A gene may be isolated, partially isolated, or be found with an organism's genome. By way of example, a transcription factor gene encodes a transcription factor polypeptide, which may be functional or require processing to function as an initiator of transcription.
Operationally, genes may be defined by the cis-trans test, a genetic test that determines whether two mutations occur in the same gene and which may be used to determine the limits of the genetically active unit (Rieger et al. (1976) Glossary of Genetics and Cytogenetics: Classical and Molecular, 4th ed., Springer Verlag. Berlin). A gene generally includes regions preceding (“leaders”; upstream) and following (“trailers”; downstream) of the coding region. A gene may also include intervening, non-coding sequences, referred to as “introns”, located between individual coding segments, referred to as “exons”. Most genes have an associated promoter region, a regulatory sequence 5′ of the transcription initiation codon (there are some genes that do not have an identifiable promoter). The function of a gene may also be regulated by enhancers, operators, and other regulatory elements.
A “recombinant polynucleotide” is a polynucleotide that is not in its native state, e.g., the polynucleotide comprises a nucleotide sequence not found in nature, or the polynucleotide is in a context other than that in which it is naturally found, e.g., separated from nucleotide sequences with which it typically is in proximity in nature, or adjacent (or contiguous with) nucleotide sequences with which it typically is not in proximity. For example, the sequence at issue can be cloned into a vector, or otherwise recombined with one or more additional nucleic acid.
An “isolated polynucleotide” is a polynucleotide whether naturally occurring or recombinant, that is present outside the cell in which it is typically found in nature, whether purified or not. Optionally, an isolated polynucleotide is subject to one or more enrichment or purification procedures, e.g., cell lysis, extraction, centrifugation, precipitation, or the like.
A “polypeptide” is an amino acid sequence comprising a plurality of consecutive polymerized amino acid residues e.g., at least about 15 consecutive polymerized amino acid residues, optionally at least about 30 consecutive polymerized amino acid residues, at least about 50 consecutive polymerized amino acid residues. In many instances, a polypeptide comprises a polymerized amino acid residue sequence that is a transcription factor or a domain or portion or fragment thereof. Additionally, the polypeptide may comprise 1) a localization domain, 2) an activation domain, 3) a repression domain, 4) an oligomerization domain, or 5) a DNA-binding domain, or the like. The polypeptide optionally comprises modified amino acid residues, naturally occurring amino acid residues not encoded by a codon, non-naturally occurring amino acid residues.
“Protein” refers to an amino acid sequence, oligopeptide, peptide, polypeptide or portions thereof whether naturally occurring or synthetic.
“Portion”, as used herein, refers to any part of a protein used for any purpose, but especially for the screening of a library of molecules which specifically bind to that portion or for the production of antibodies.
A “recombinant polypeptide” is a polypeptide produced by translation of a recombinant polynucleotide. A “synthetic polypeptide” is a polypeptide created by consecutive polymerization of isolated amino acid residues using methods well known in the art. An “isolated polypeptide,” whether a naturally occurring or a recombinant polypeptide, is more enriched in (or out of) a cell than the polypeptide in its natural state in a wild-type cell, e.g., more than about 5% enriched, more than about 10% enriched, or more than about 20%, or more than about 50%, or more, enriched, i.e., alternatively denoted: 105%, 110%, 120%, 150% or more, enriched relative to wild type standardized at 100%. Such an enrichment is not the result of a natural response of a wild-type plant. Alternatively, or additionally, the isolated polypeptide is separated from other cellular components with which it is typically associated, e.g., by any of the various protein purification methods herein.
“Homology” refers to sequence similarity between a reference sequence and at least a fragment of a newly sequenced clone insert or its encoded amino acid sequence.
“Hybridization complex” refers to a complex between two nucleic acid molecules by virtue of the formation of hydrogen bonds between purines and pyrimidines.
“Identity” or “similarity” refers to sequence similarity between two polynucleotide sequences or between two polypeptide sequences, with identity being a more strict comparison. The phrases “percent identity” and “% identity” refer to the percentage of sequence similarity found in a comparison of two or more polynucleotide sequences or two or more polypeptide sequences. “Sequence similarity” refers to the percent similarity in base pair sequence (as determined by any suitable method) between two or more polynucleotide sequences. Two or more sequences can be anywhere from 0-100% similar, or any integer value therebetween. Identity or similarity can be determined by comparing a position in each sequence that may be aligned for purposes of comparison. When a position in the compared sequence is occupied by the same nucleotide base or amino acid, then the molecules are identical at that position. A degree of similarity or identity between polynucleotide sequences is a function of the number of identical or matching nucleotides at positions shared by the polynucleotide sequences. A degree of identity of polypeptide sequences is a function of the number of identical amino acids at positions shared by the polypeptide sequences. A degree of homology or similarity of polypeptide sequences is a function of the number of amino acids at positions shared by the polypeptide sequences.
The term “amino acid consensus motif” refers to the portion or subsequence of a polypeptide sequence that is substantially conserved among the polypeptide transcription factors listed in the Sequence Listing.
“Alignment” refers to a number of DNA or amino acid sequences aligned by lengthwise comparison so that components in common (i.e., nucleotide bases or amino acid residues) may be readily and graphically identified. The number of components in common is related to the homology or identity between the sequences. Alignments may be used to identify “conserved domains” and relatedness within these domains. An alignment may suitably be determined by means of computer programs known in the art, such as MacVector (1999) (Accelrys, Inc., San Diego, Calif.).
A “conserved domain” or “conserved region” as used herein refers to a region in heterologous polynucleotide or polypeptide sequences where there is a relatively high degree of sequence identity between the distinct sequences.
With respect to polynucleotides encoding presently disclosed transcription factors, a conserved region is preferably at least 10 base pairs (bp) in length.
A “conserved domain”, with respect to presently disclosed polypeptides refers to a domain within a transcription factor family that exhibits a higher degree of sequence homology, such as at least 26% sequence similarity, at least 16% sequence identity, preferably at least 40% sequence identity, preferably at least 65% sequence identity including conservative substitutions, and more preferably at least 80% sequence identity, and even more preferably at least 85%, or at least about 86%, or at least about 87%, or at least about 88%, or at least about 90%, or at least about 95%, or at least about 98% amino acid residue sequence identity of a polypeptide of consecutive amino acid residues. A fragment or domain can be referred to as outside a conserved domain, outside a consensus sequence, or outside a consensus DNA-binding site that is known to exist or that exists for a particular transcription factor class, family, or sub-family. In this case, the fragment or domain will not include the exact amino acids of a consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site of a transcription factor class, family or sub-family, or the exact amino acids of a particular transcription factor consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site. Furthermore, a particular fragment, region, or domain of a polypeptide, or a polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide, can be “outside a conserved domain” if all the amino acids of the fragment, region, or domain fall outside of a defined conserved domain(s) for a polypeptide or protein. Sequences having lesser degrees of identity but comparable biological activity are considered to be equivalents.
As one of ordinary skill in the art recognizes, conserved domains may be identified as regions or domains of identity to a specific consensus sequence (see, for example, Riechmann et al. (2000) supra). Thus, by using alignment methods well known in the art, the conserved domains of the plant transcription factors for each of the following may be determined: the AP2 (APETALA2) domain transcription factor family (Riechmann and Meyerowitz (1998) supra; the MYB transcription factor family (ENBib; Martin and Paz-Ares (1997) supra); the MADS domain transcription factor family (Riechmann and Meyerowitz (1997) supra; Immink et al. (2003) supra); the WRKY protein family (Ishiguro and Nakamura (1994) supra); the ankyrin-repeat protein family (Zhang et al. (1992) supra); the zinc finger protein (Z) family (Klug and Schwabe (1995) supra; Takatsuji (1998) supra); the homeobox (HB) protein family (Buerglin (1994) supra); the CAAT-element binding proteins (Forsburg and Guarente (1989) supra); the squamosa promoter binding proteins (SPB) (Klein et al. (1996) supra); the NAM protein family (Souer et al. (1996) supra); the IAA/AUX proteins (Abel et al. (1995) supra); the HLH/MYC protein family (Littlewood et al. (1994) supra); the DNA-binding protein (DBP) family (Tucker et al. (1994) supra); the bZIP family of transcription factors (Foster et al. (1994) supra); the Box P-binding protein (the BPF-1) family (da Costa e Silva et al. (1993) supra); the high mobility group (HMG) family (Bustin and Reeves (1996) supra); the scarecrow (SCR) family (Di Laurenzio et al. (1996) supra); the GF14 family (Wu et al. (1997) supra); the polycomb (PCOMB) family (Goodrich et al. (1997) supra); the teosinte branched (TEO) family (Luo et al. (1996) supra); the ABI3 family (Giraudat et al. (1992) supra); the triple helix (TH) family (Dehesh et al. (1990) supra); the EIL family (Chao et al. (1997) Cell supra); the AT-HOOK family (Reeves and Nissen (1990 supra); the S1FA family (Zhou et al. (1995) supra); the bZIPT2 family (Lu and Ferl (1995) supra); the Y ABBY family (Bowman et al. (1999) supra); the PAZ family (Bohmert et al. (1998) supra); a family of miscellaneous (MISC) transcription factors including the DPBF family (Kim et al. (1997) supra) and the SPF1 family (Ishiguro and Nakamura (1994) supra); the GARP family (Hall et al. (1998) supra), the TUBBY family (Boggin et al. (1999) supra), the heat shock family (Wu (1995 supra), the ENBP family (Christiansen et al. (1996) supra), the RING-zinc family (Jensen et al. (1998) supra), the PDBP family (Janik et al. (1989) supra), the PCF family (Cubas et al. (1999) supra), the SRS (SHI-related) family (Fridborg et al. (1999) supra), the CPP (cysteine-rich polycomb-like) family (Cvitanich et al. (2000) supra), the ARF (auxin response factor) family (Ulmasov et al. (1999) supra), the SWI/SNF family (Collingwood et al. (1999) supra), the ACBF family (Seguin et al. (1997) supra), PCGL (CG-1 like) family (da Costa e Silva et al. (1994) supra) the ARID family (Vazquez et al. (1999) supra), the Jumonji family, (Balciunas et al. (2000) supra), the bZIP-NIN family (Schauser et al. (1999) supra), the E2F family Kaelin et al. (1992) supra) and the GRF-like family (Knaap et al (2000) supra).
The conserved domains for each of polypeptides of SEQ ID NO: 2N, wherein N=1-335 (that is, odd SEQ ID NO: 1, 3 5, 7 . . . 759) are listed in Table 5. Also, many of the polypeptides of Table 5 have conserved domains specifically indicated by start and stop sites. A comparison of the regions of the polypeptides in SEQ ID NO: 2N, wherein N=1-335 (that is, even SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8 . . . 760), or of those in Table 5, allows one of skill in the art to identify conserved domain(s) for any of the polypeptides listed or referred to in this disclosure, including those in Tables 4-9.
“Complementary” refers to the natural hydrogen bonding by base pairing between purines and pyrimidines. For example, the sequence A-C-G-T (5′->3′) forms hydrogen bonds with its complements A-C-G-T (5′->3′) or A-C-G-U (5′->3′). Two single-stranded molecules may be considered partially complementary, if only some of the nucleotides bond, or “completely complementary” if all of the nucleotides bond. The degree of complementarity between nucleic acid strands affects the efficiency and strength of the hybridization and amplification reactions. “Fully complementary” refers to the case where bonding occurs between every base pair and its complement in a pair of sequences, and the two sequences have the same number of nucleotides.
The terms “highly stringent” or “highly stringent condition” refer to conditions that permit hybridization of DNA strands whose sequences are highly complementary, wherein these same conditions exclude hybridization of significantly mismatched DNAs. Polynucleotide sequences capable of hybridizing under stringent conditions with the polynucleotides of the present invention may be, for example, variants of the disclosed polynucleotide sequences, including allelic or splice variants, or sequences that encode orthologs or paralogs of presently disclosed polypeptides. Nucleic acid hybridization methods are disclosed in detail by Kashima et al. (1985) Nature 313:402-404, and Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (“Sambrook”); and by Haymes et al., “Nucleic Acid Hybridization: A Practical Approach”, IRL Press, Washington, D.C. (1985), which references are incorporated herein by reference.
In general, stringency is determined by the temperature, ionic strength, and concentration of denaturing agents (e.g., formamide) used in a hybridization and washing procedure (for a more detailed description of establishing and determining stringency, see below). The degree to which two nucleic acids hybridize under various conditions of stringency is correlated with the extent of their similarity. Thus, similar nucleic acid sequences from a variety of sources, such as within a plant's genome (as in the case of paralogs) or from another plant (as in the case of orthologs) that may perform similar functions can be isolated on the basis of their ability to hybridize with known transcription factor sequences. Numerous variations are possible in the conditions and means by which nucleic acid hybridization can be performed to isolate transcription factor sequences having similarity to transcription factor sequences known in the art and are not limited to those explicitly disclosed herein. Such an approach may be used to isolate polynucleotide sequences having various degrees of similarity with disclosed transcription factor sequences, such as, for example, transcription factors having 60% identity, or more preferably greater than about 70% identity, most preferably 72% or greater identity with disclosed transcription factors.
The term “equivalog” describes members of a set of homologous proteins that are conserved with respect to function since their last common ancestor. Related proteins are grouped into equivalog families, and otherwise into protein families with other hierarchically defined homology types. This definition is provided at the Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) world wide web (www) website, “tigr.org” under the heading “Terms associated with TIGRFAMs”.
The term “variant”, as used herein, may refer to polynucleotides or polypeptides, that differ from the presently disclosed polynucleotides or polypeptides, respectively, in sequence from each other, and as set forth below.
With regard to polynucleotide variants, differences between presently disclosed polynucleotides and polynucleotide variants are limited so that the nucleotide sequences of the former and the latter are closely similar overall and, in many regions, identical. Due to the degeneracy of the genetic code, differences between the former and latter nucleotide sequences o may be silent (i.e., the amino acids encoded by the polynucleotide are the same, and the variant polynucleotide sequence encodes the same amino acid sequence as the presently disclosed polynucleotide. Variant nucleotide sequences may encode different amino acid sequences, in which case such nucleotide differences will result in amino acid substitutions, additions, deletions, insertions, truncations or fusions with respect to the similar disclosed polynucleotide sequences. These variations result in polynucleotide variants encoding polypeptides that share at least one functional characteristic. The degeneracy of the genetic code also dictates that many different variant polynucleotides can encode identical and/or substantially similar polypeptides in addition to those sequences illustrated in the Sequence Listing.
Also within the scope of the invention is a variant of a transcription factor nucleic acid listed in the Sequence Listing, that is, one having a sequence that differs from the one of the polynucleotide sequences in the Sequence Listing, or a complementary sequence, that encodes a functionally equivalent polypeptide (i.e., a polypeptide having some degree of equivalent or similar biological activity) but differs in sequence from the sequence in the Sequence Listing, due to degeneracy in the genetic code. Included within this definition are polymorphisms that may or may not be readily detectable using a particular oligonucleotide probe of the polynucleotide encoding polypeptide, and improper or unexpected hybridization to allelic variants, with a locus other than the normal chromosomal locus for the polynucleotide sequence encoding polypeptide.
“Allelic variant” or “polynucleotide allelic variant” refers to any of two or more alternative forms of a gene occupying the same chromosomal locus. Allelic variation arises naturally through mutation, and may result in phenotypic polymorphism within populations. Gene mutations may be “silent” or may encode polypeptides having altered amino acid sequence. “Allelic variant” and “polypeptide allelic variant” may also be used with respect to polypeptides, and in this case the term refer to a polypeptide encoded by an allelic variant of a gene.
“Splice variant” or “polynucleotide splice variant” as used herein refers to alternative forms of RNA transcribed from a gene. Splice variation naturally occurs as a result of alternative sites being spliced within a single transcribed RNA molecule or between separately transcribed RNA molecules, and may result in several different forms of mRNA transcribed from the same gene. This, splice variants may encode polypeptides having different amino acid sequences, which may or may not have similar functions in the organism. “Splice variant” or “polypeptide splice variant” may also refer to a polypeptide encoded by a splice variant of a transcribed mRNA.
As used herein, “polynucleotide variants” may also refer to polynucleotide sequences that encode paralogs and orthologs of the presently disclosed polypeptide sequences. “Polypeptide variants” may refer to polypeptide sequences that are paralogs and orthologs of the presently disclosed polypeptide sequences.
Differences between presently disclosed polypeptides and polypeptide variants are limited so that the sequences of the former and the latter are closely similar overall and, in many regions, identical. Presently disclosed polypeptide sequences and similar polypeptide variants may differ in amino acid sequence by one or more substitutions, additions, deletions, fusions and truncations, which may be present in any combination. These differences may produce silent changes and result in a functionally equivalent transcription factor. Thus, it will be readily appreciated by those of skill in the art, that any of a variety of polynucleotide sequences is capable of encoding the transcription factors and transcription factor homolog polypeptides of the invention. A polypeptide sequence variant may have “conservative” changes, wherein a substituted amino acid has similar structural or chemical properties. Deliberate amino acid substitutions may thus be made on the basis of similarity in polarity, charge, solubility, hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, and/or the amphipathic nature of the residues, as long as the functional or biological activity of the transcription factor is retained. For example, negatively charged amino acids may include aspartic acid and glutamic acid, positively charged amino acids may include lysine and arginine, and amino acids with uncharged polar head groups having similar hydrophilicity values may include leucine, isoleucine, and valine; glycine and alanine; asparagine and glutamine; serine and threonine; and phenylalanine and tyrosine (for more detail on conservative substitutions, see Table 2). More rarely, a variant may have “non-conservative” changes, e.g., replacement of a glycine with a tryptophan. Similar minor variations may also include amino acid deletions or insertions, or both. Related polypeptides may comprise, for example, additions and/or deletions of one or more N-linked or O-linked glycosylation sites, or an addition and/or a deletion of one or more cysteine residues. Guidance in determining which and how many amino acid residues may be substituted, inserted or deleted without abolishing functional or biological activity may be found using computer programs well known in the art, for example, DNASTAR software (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,544).
“Ligand” refers to any molecule, agent, or compound that will bind specifically to a complementary site on a nucleic acid molecule or protein. Such ligands stabilize or modulate the activity of nucleic acid molecules or proteins of the invention and may be composed of at least one of the following: inorganic and organic substances including nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates, fats, and lipids.
“Modulates” refers to a change in activity (biological, chemical, or immunological) or lifespan resulting from specific binding between a molecule and either a nucleic acid molecule or a protein.
The term “plant” includes whole plants, shoot vegetative organs/structures (e.g., leaves, stems and tubers), roots, flowers and floral organs/structures (e.g., bracts, sepals, petals, stamens, carpels, anthers and ovules), seed (including embryo, endosperm, and seed coat) and fruit (the mature ovary), plant tissue (e.g., vascular tissue, ground tissue, and the like) and cells (e.g., guard cells, egg cells, and the like), and progeny of same. The class of plants that can be used in the method of the invention is generally as broad as the class of higher and lower plants amenable to transformation techniques, including angiosperms (monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants), gymnosperms, ferns, horsetails, psilophytes, lycophytes, bryophytes, and multicellular algae. (See for example, FIG. 1, adapted from Daly et al. (2001) Plant Physiol. 127: 1328-1333; FIG. 2, adapted from Ku et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 9121-9126; and see also Tudge in The Variety of Life, Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y. (2000) pp. 547-606).
A “transgenic plant” refers to a plant that contains genetic material not found in a wild-type plant of the same species, variety or cultivar. The genetic material may include a transgene, an insertional mutagenesis event (such as by transposon or T-DNA insertional mutagenesis), an activation tagging sequence, a mutated sequence, a homologous recombination event or a sequence modified by chimeraplasty. Typically, the foreign genetic material has been introduced into the plant by human manipulation, but any method can be used as one of skill in the art recognizes.
A transgenic plant may contain an expression vector or cassette. The expression cassette typically comprises a polypeptide-encoding sequence operably linked (i.e., under regulatory control of) to appropriate inducible or constitutive regulatory sequences that allow for the expression of polypeptide. The expression cassette can be introduced into a plant by transformation or by breeding after transformation of a parent plant. A plant refers to a whole plant as well as to a plant part, such as seed, fruit, leaf, or root, plant tissue, plant cells or any other plant material, e.g., a plant explant, as well as to progeny thereof, and to in vitro systems that mimic biochemical or cellular components or processes in a cell.
“Control plant” refers to a plant that serves as a standard of comparison for testing the results of a treatment or genetic alteration, or the degree of altered expression of a gene or gene product. Examples of control plants include plants that are untreated, or genetically unaltered (i.e., wild-type).
“Wild type”, as used herein, refers to a cell, tissue or plant that has not been genetically modified to knock out or overexpress one or more of the presently disclosed transcription factors. Wild-type cells, tissue or plants may be used as controls to compare levels of expression and the extent and nature of trait modification with cells, tissue or plants in which transcription factor expression is altered or ectopically expressed, e.g., in that it has been knocked out or overexpressed.
“Fragment”, with respect to a polynucleotide, refers to a clone or any part of a polynucleotide molecule that retains a usable, functional characteristic. Useful fragments include oligonucleotides and polynucleotides that may be used in hybridization or amplification technologies or in the regulation of replication, transcription or translation. A polynucleotide fragment” refers to any subsequence of a polynucleotide, typically, of at least about 9 consecutive nucleotides, preferably at least about 30 nucleotides, more preferably at least about 50 nucleotides, of any of the sequences provided herein. Exemplary polynucleotide fragments are the first sixty consecutive nucleotides of the transcription factor polynucleotides listed in the Sequence Listing. Exemplary fragments also include fragments that comprise a region that encodes a conserved domain of a transcription factor.
Fragments may also include subsequences of polypeptides and protein molecules, or a subsequence of the polypeptide. Fragments may have uses in that they may have antigenic potential. In some cases, the fragment or domain is a subsequence of the polypeptide which performs at least one biological function of the intact polypeptide in substantially the same manner, or to a similar extent, as does the intact polypeptide. For example, a polypeptide fragment can comprise a recognizable structural motif or functional domain such as a DNA-binding site or domain that binds to a DNA promoter region, an activation domain, or a domain for protein-protein interactions, and may initiate transcription. Fragments can vary in size from as few as 3 amino acids to the full length of the intact polypeptide, but are preferably at least about 30 amino acids in length and more preferably at least about 60 amino acids in length. Exemplary polypeptide fragments are the first twenty consecutive amino acids of a mammalian protein encoded by are the first twenty consecutive amino acids of the transcription factor polypeptides listed in the Sequence Listing. Exemplary fragments also include fragments that comprise a conserved domain of a transcription factor, for example, amino acid residues 11-80 of G47 (SEQ ID NO: 12), as noted in Table 5.
The invention also encompasses production of DNA sequences that encode transcription factors and transcription factor derivatives, or fragments thereof, entirely by synthetic chemistry. After production, the synthetic sequence may be inserted into any of the many available expression vectors and cell systems using reagents well known in the art. Moreover, synthetic chemistry may be used to introduce mutations into a sequence encoding transcription factors or any fragment thereof.
“Derivative” refers to the chemical modification of a nucleic acid molecule or amino acid sequence. Chemical modifications can include replacement of hydrogen by an alkyl, acyl, or amino group or glycosylation, pegylation, or any similar process that retains or enhances biological activity or lifespan of the molecule or sequence.
A “trait” refers to a physiological, morphological, biochemical, or physical characteristic of a plant or particular plant material or cell. In some instances, this characteristic is visible to the human eye, such as seed or plant size, or can be measured by biochemical techniques, such as detecting the protein, starch, or oil content of seed or leaves, or by observation of a metabolic or physiological process, e.g. by measuring uptake of carbon dioxide, or by the observation of the expression level of a gene or genes, e.g., by employing Northern analysis, RT-PCR, microarray gene expression assays, or reporter gene expression systems, or by agricultural observations such as stress tolerance, yield, or pathogen tolerance. Any technique can be used to measure the amount of, comparative level of, or difference in any selected chemical compound or macromolecule in the transgenic plants, however.
“Trait modification” refers to a detectable difference in a characteristic in a plant ectopically expressing a polynucleotide or polypeptide of the present invention relative to a plant not doing so, such as a wild-type plant. In some cases, the trait modification can be evaluated quantitatively. For example, the trait modification can entail at least about a 2% increase or decrease in an observed trait (difference), at least a 5% difference, at least about a 10% difference, at least about a 20% difference, at least about a 30%, at least about a 50%, at least about a 70%, or at least about a 100%, or an even greater difference compared with a wild-type plant. It is known that there can be a natural variation in the modified trait. Therefore, the trait modification observed entails a change of the normal distribution of the trait in the plants compared with the distribution observed in wild-type plants.
The term “transcript profile” refers to the expression levels of a set of genes in a cell in a particular state, particularly by comparison with the expression levels of that same set of genes in a cell of the same type in a reference state. For example, the transcript profile of a particular transcription factor in a suspension cell is the expression levels of a set of genes in a cell overexpressing that transcription factor compared with the expression levels of that same set of genes in a suspension cell that has normal levels of that transcription factor. The transcript profile can be presented as a list of those genes whose expression level is significantly different between the two treatments, and the difference ratios. Differences and similarities between expression levels may also be evaluated and calculated using statistical and clustering methods.
“Ectopic expression or altered expression” in reference to a polynucleotide indicates that the pattern of expression in, e.g., a transgenic plant or plant tissue, is different from the expression pattern in a wild-type plant or a reference plant of the same species. The pattern of expression may also be compared with a reference expression pattern in a wild-type plant of the same species. For example, the polynucleotide or polypeptide is expressed in a cell or tissue type other than a cell or tissue type in which the sequence is expressed in the wild-type plant, or by expression at a time other than at the time the sequence is expressed in the wild-type plant, or by a response to different inducible agents, such as hormones or environmental signals, or at different expression levels (either higher or lower) compared with those found in a wild-type plant. The term also refers to altered expression patterns that are produced by lowering the levels of expression to below the detection level or completely abolishing expression. The resulting expression pattern can be transient or stable, constitutive or inducible. In reference to a polypeptide, the term “ectopic expression or altered expression” further may relate to altered activity levels resulting from the interactions of the polypeptides with exogenous or endogenous modulators or from interactions with factors or as a result of the chemical modification of the polypeptides.
The term “overexpression” as used herein refers to a greater expression level of a gene in a plant, plant cell or plant tissue, compared to expression in a wild-type plant, cell or tissue, at any developmental or temporal stage for the gene. Overexpression can occur when, for example, the genes encoding one or more transcription factors are under the control of a strong expression signal, such as one of the promoters described herein (e.g., the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S transcription initiation region). Overexpression may occur throughout a plant or in specific tissues of the plant, depending on the promoter used, as described below.
Overexpression may take place in plant cells normally lacking expression of polypeptides functionally equivalent or identical to the present transcription factors. Overexpression may also occur in plant cells where endogenous expression of the present transcription factors or functionally equivalent molecules normally occurs, but such normal expression is at a lower level. Overexpression thus results in a greater than normal production, or “overproduction” of the transcription factor in the plant, cell or tissue.
The term “phase change” refers to a plant's progression from embryo to adult, and, by some definitions, the transition wherein flowering plants gain reproductive competency. It is believed that phase change occurs either after a certain number of cell divisions in the shoot apex of a developing plant, or when the shoot apex achieves a particular distance from the roots. Thus, altering the timing of phase changes may affect a plant's size, which, in turn, may affect yield and biomass.
“Tolerance” results from specific, heritable characteristics of a host plant that allow a pathogen to develop and multiply in the host while the host, either by lacking receptor sites for, or by inactivating or compensating for the irritant secretions of the pathogen, still manages to thrive or, in the case of crop plants, produce a good crop. Tolerant plants are susceptible to the pathogen but are not killed by it and generally show little damage from the pathogen (Agrios (1988) Plant Pathology, 3rd ed. Academic Press, N.Y., p. 129).
“Resistance”, also referred to as “true resistance”, results when a plant contains one or more genes that make the plant and a potential pathogen more or less incompatible with each other, either because of a lack of chemical recognition between the host and the pathogen, or because the host plant can defend itself against the pathogen by defense mechanisms already present or activated in response to infection (Agrios (1988)) Plant Pathology, 3rd ed. Academic Press, N.Y., p. 125).
A “sample” with respect to a material containing nucleic acid molecules may comprise a bodily fluid; an extract from a cell, chromosome, organelle, or membrane isolated from a cell; genomic DNA, RNA, or cDNA in solution or bound to a substrate; a cell; a tissue; a tissue print; a forensic sample; and the like. In this context “substrate” refers to any rigid or semi-rigid support to which nucleic acid molecules or proteins are bound and includes membranes, filters, chips, slides, wafers, fibers, magnetic or nonmagnetic beads, gels, capillaries or other tubing, plates, polymers, and microparticles with a variety of surface forms including wells, trenches, pins, channels and pores. A substrate may also refer to a reactant in a chemical or biological reaction, or a substance acted upon (e.g., by an enzyme).
“Substantially purified” refers to nucleic acid molecules or proteins that are removed from their natural environment and are isolated or separated, and are at least about 60% free, preferably about 75% free, and most preferably about 90% free, from other components with which they are naturally associated.
Traits That May Be Modified in Overexpressing or Knock-out Plants
Trait modifications of particular interest include those to seed (such as embryo or endosperm), fruit, root, flower, leaf, stem, shoot, seedling or the like, including: enhanced tolerance to environmental conditions including freezing, chilling, heat, drought, water saturation, radiation and ozone; improved tolerance to microbial, fungal or viral diseases; improved tolerance to pest infestations, including insects, nematodes, mollicutes, parasitic higher plants or the like; decreased herbicide sensitivity; improved tolerance of heavy metals or enhanced ability to take up heavy metals; improved growth under poor photoconditions (e.g., low light and/or short day length), or changes in expression levels of genes of interest. Other phenotype that can be modified relate to the production of plant metabolites, such as variations in the production of taxol, tocopherol, tocotrienol, sterols, phytosterols, vitamins, wax monomers, anti-oxidants, amino acids, lignins, cellulose, tannins, prenyllipids (such as chlorophylls and carotenoids), glucosinolates, and terpenoids, enhanced or compositionally altered protein or oil production (especially in seeds), or modified sugar (insoluble or soluble) and/or starch composition. Physical plant characteristics that can be modified include cell development (such as the number of trichomes), fruit and seed size and number, yields of plant parts such as stems, leaves, inflorescences, and roots, the stability of the seeds during storage, characteristics of the seed pod (e.g., susceptibility to shattering), root hair length and quantity, internode distances, or the quality of seed coat. Plant growth characteristics that can be modified include growth rate, germination rate of seeds, vigor of plants and seedlings, leaf and flower senescence, male sterility, apomixis, flowering time, flower abscission, rate of nitrogen uptake, osmotic sensitivity to soluble sugar concentrations, biomass or transpiration characteristics, as well as plant architecture characteristics such as apical dominance, branching patterns, number of organs, organ identity, organ shape or size.
Transcription Factors Modify Expression of Endogenous Genes
Expression of genes that encode transcription factors that modify expression of endogenous genes, polynucleotides, and proteins are well known in the art. In addition, transgenic plants comprising isolated polynucleotides encoding transcription factors may also modify expression of endogenous genes, polynucleotides, and proteins. Examples include Peng et al. (1997, Genes Development 11: 3194-3205) and Peng et al. (1999, Nature, 400: 256-261). In addition, many others have demonstrated that an Arabidopsis transcription factor expressed in an exogenous plant species elicits the same or very similar phenotypic response. See, for example, Fu et al. (2001, Plant Cell 13: 1791-1802); Nandi et al. (2000, Curr. Biol. 10: 215-218); Coupland (1995, Nature 377: 482-483); and Weigel and Nilsson (1995, Nature 377: 482-500).
In another example, Mandel et al. (1992, Cell 71-133-143) and Suzuki et al. (2001, Plant J. 28: 409-418) teach that a transcription factor expressed in another plant species elicits the same or very similar phenotypic response of the endogenous sequence, as often predicted in earlier studies of Arabidopsis transcription factors in Arabidopsis (see Mandel et al. 1992, supra; Suzuki et al. 2001, supra).
Other examples include Müller et al. (2001, Plant J. 28: 169-179); Kim et al. (2001, Plant J. 25: 247-259); Kyozuka and Shimamoto (2002, Plant Cell Physiol. 43: 130-135); Boss and Thomas (2002, Nature, 416: 847-850); He et al. (2000, Transgenic Res. 9: 223-227); and Robson et al. (2001, Plant J. 28: 619-631).
In yet another example, Gilmour et al. (1998, Plant J. 16: 433-442) teach an Arabidopsis AP2 transcription factor, CBF1 (SEQ ID NO: 2239), which, when overexpressed in transgenic plants, increases plant freezing tolerance. Jaglo et al. (2001, Plant Physiol. 127: 910-917) further identified sequences in Brassica napus which encode CBF-like genes and that transcripts for these genes accumulated rapidly in response to low temperature. Transcripts encoding CBF-like proteins were also found to accumulate rapidly in response to low temperature in wheat, as well as in tomato. An alignment of the CBF proteins from Arabidopsis, B. napus, wheat, rye, and tomato revealed the presence of conserved consecutive amino acid residues, PKK/RPAGRxKFxETRHP and DSAWR, that bracket the AP2/EREBP DNA binding domains of the proteins and distinguish them from other members of the AP2/EREBP protein family. (See Jaglo et al. supra.)
Transcription factors mediate cellular responses and control traits through altered expression of genes containing cis-acting nucleotide sequences that are targets of the introduced transcription factor. It is well appreciated in the Art that the effect of a transcription factor on cellular responses or a cellular trait is determined by the particular genes whose expression is either directly or indirectly (e.g., by a cascade of transcription factor binding events and transcriptional changes) altered by transcription factor binding. In a global analysis of transcription comparing a standard condition with one in which a transcription factor is overexpressed, the resulting transcript profile associated with transcription factor overexpression is related to the trait or cellular process controlled by that transcription factor. For example, the PAP2 gene (and other genes in the MYB family) have been shown to control anthocyanin biosynthesis through regulation of the expression of genes known to be involved in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (Bruce et al. (2000) Plant Cell 12: 65-79; and Borevitz et al. (2000) Plant Cell 12: 2383-2393). Further, global transcript profiles have been used successfully as diagnostic tools for specific cellular states (e.g., cancerous vs. non-cancerous; Bhattacharjee et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98: 13790-13795; and Xu et al. (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci, U.S.A. 98: 15089-15094). Consequently, it is evident to one skilled in the art that similarity of transcript profile upon overexpression of different transcription factors would indicate similarity of transcription factor function.
Polypeptides and Polynucleotides of the Invention
The present invention provides, among other things, transcription factors (TFs), and transcription factor homolog polypeptides, and isolated or recombinant polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides, or novel sequence variant polypeptides or polynucleotides encoding novel variants of transcription factors derived from the specific sequences provided here. These polypeptides and polynucleotides may be employed to modify a plant's characteristics.
Exemplary polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides of the invention were identified in the Arabidopsis thaliana GenBank database using publicly available sequence analysis programs and parameters. Sequences initially identified were then further characterized to identify sequences comprising specified sequence strings corresponding to sequence motifs present in families of known transcription factors. In addition, further exemplary polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides of the invention were identified in the plant GenBank database using publicly available sequence analysis programs and parameters. Sequences initially identified were then further characterized to identify sequences comprising specified sequence strings corresponding to sequence motifs present in families of known transcription factors. Polynucleotide sequences meeting such criteria were confirmed as transcription factors.
Additional polynucleotides of the invention were identified by screening Arabidopsis thaliana and/or other plant cDNA libraries with probes corresponding to known transcription factors under low stringency hybridization conditions. Additional sequences, including full length coding sequences were subsequently recovered by the rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) procedure, using a commercially available kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Where necessary, multiple rounds of RACE are performed to isolate 5′ and 3′ ends. The full-length cDNA was then recovered by a routine end-to-end polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers specific to the isolated 5′ and 3′ ends. Exemplary sequences are provided in the Sequence Listing.
The polynucleotides of the invention can be or were ectopically expressed in overexpressor or knockout plants and the changes in the characteristic(s) or trait(s) of the plants observed. Therefore, the polynucleotides and polypeptides can be employed to improve the characteristics of plants.
The polynucleotides of the invention can be or were ectopically expressed in overexpressor plant cells and the changes in the expression levels of a number of genes, polynucleotides, and/or proteins of the plant cells observed. Therefore, the polynucleotides and polypeptides can be employed to change expression levels of a genes, polynucleotides, and/or proteins of plants.
Producing Polypeptides
The polynucleotides of the invention include sequences that encode transcription factors and transcription factor homolog polypeptides and sequences complementary thereto, as well as unique fragments of coding sequence, or sequence complementary thereto. Such polynucleotides can be, e.g., DNA or RNA, e.g., mRNA, cRNA, synthetic RNA, genomic DNA, cDNA synthetic DNA, oligonucleotides, etc. The polynucleotides are either double-stranded or single-stranded, and include either, or both sense (i.e., coding) sequences and antisense (i.e., non-coding, complementary) sequences. The polynucleotides include the coding sequence of a transcription factor, or transcription factor homolog polypeptide, in isolation, in combination with additional coding sequences (e.g., a purification tag, a localization signal, as a fusion-protein, as a pre-protein, or the like), in combination with non-coding sequences (e.g., introns or inteins, regulatory elements such as promoters, enhancers, terminators, and the like), and/or in a vector or host environment in which the polynucleotide encoding a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog polypeptide is an endogenous or exogenous gene.
A variety of methods exist for producing the polynucleotides of the invention. Procedures for identifying and isolating DNA clones are well known to those of skill in the art, and are described in, e.g., Berger and Kimmel, Guide to Molecular Cloning Techniques. Methods in Enzymology, vol. 152 Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif. (“Berger”); Sambrook et al. Molecular Cloning—A Laboratory Manual (2nd Ed.), Vol. 1-3, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1989 (“Sambrook”) and Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Ausubel et al. eds., Current Protocols, a joint venture between Greene Publishing Associates, Inc. and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (supplemented through 2000) (“Ausubel”).
Alternatively, polynucleotides of the invention, can be produced by a variety of in vitro amplification methods adapted to the present invention by appropriate selection of specific or degenerate primers. Examples of protocols sufficient to direct persons of skill through in vitro amplification methods, including the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) the ligase chain reaction (LCR), Qbeta-replicase amplification and other RNA polymerase mediated techniques (e.g., NASBA), e.g., for the production of the homologous nucleic acids of the invention are found in Berger (supra), Sambrook (supra), and Ausubel (supra), as well as Mullis et al. (1987) PCR Protocols A Guide to Methods and Applications (Innis et al. eds) Academic Press Inc. San Diego, Calif. (1990) (Innis). Improved methods for cloning in vitro amplified nucleic acids are described in Wallace et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,426,039. Improved methods for amplifying large nucleic acids by PCR are summarized in Cheng et al. (1994) Nature 369: 684-685 and the references cited therein, in which PCR amplicons of up to 40 kb are generated. One of skill will appreciate that essentially any RNA can be converted into a double stranded DNA suitable for restriction digestion, PCR expansion and sequencing using reverse transcriptase and a polymerase. See, e.g., Ausubel, Sambrook and Berger, all supra.
Alternatively, polynucleotides and oligonucleotides of the invention can be assembled from fragments produced by solid-phase synthesis methods. Typically, fragments of up to approximately 100 bases are individually synthesized and then enzymatically or chemically ligated to produce a desired sequence, e.g., a polynucleotide encoding all or part of a transcription factor. For example, chemical synthesis using the phosphoramidite method is described, e.g., by Beaucage et al. (1981) Tetrahedron Letters 22: 1859-1869; and Matthes et al. (1984) EMBO J. 3: 801-805. According to such methods, oligonucleotides are synthesized, purified, annealed to their complementary strand, ligated and then optionally cloned into suitable vectors. And if so desired, the polynucleotides and polypeptides of the invention can be custom ordered from any of a number of commercial suppliers.
Homologous Sequences
Sequences homologous, i.e., that share significant sequence identity or similarity, to those provided in the Sequence Listing, derived from Arabidopsis thaliana or from other plants of choice, are also an aspect of the invention. Homologous sequences can be derived from any plant including monocots and dicots and in particular agriculturally important plant species, including but not limited to, crops such as soybean, wheat, corn (maize), potato, cotton, rice, rape, oilseed rape (including canola), sunflower, alfalfa, clover, sugarcane, and turf; or fruits and vegetables, such as banana, blackberry, blueberry, strawberry, and raspberry, cantaloupe, carrot, cauliflower, coffee, cucumber, eggplant, grapes, honeydew, lettuce, mango, melon, onion, papaya, peas, peppers, pineapple, pumpkin, spinach, squash, sweet corn, tobacco, tomato, tomatillo, watermelon, rosaceous fruits (such as apple, peach, pear, cherry and plum) and vegetable brassicas (such as broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, and kohlrabi). Other crops, including fruits and vegetables, whose phenotype can be changed and which comprise homologous sequences include barley; rye; millet; sorghum; currant; avocado; citrus fruits such as oranges, lemons, grapefruit and tangerines, artichoke, cherries; nuts such as the walnut and peanut; endive; leek; roots such as arrowroot, beet, cassava, turnip, radish, yam, and sweet potato; and beans. The homologous sequences may also be derived from woody species, such pine, poplar and eucalyptus, or mint or other labiates. In addition, homologous sequences may be derived from plants that are evolutionarily-related to crop plants, but which may not have yet been used as crop plants. Examples include deadly nightshade (Atropa belladona), related to tomato; jimson weed (Datura strommium), related to peyote; and teosinte (Zea species), related to corn (maize).
Orthologs and Paralogs
Homologous sequences as described above can comprise orthologous or paralogous sequences. Several different methods are known by those of skill in the art for identifying and defining these functionally homologous sequences. Three general methods for defining orthologs and paralogs are described; an ortholog, paralog or homolog may be identified by one or more of the methods described below.
Orthologs and paralogs are evolutionarily related genes that have similar sequence and similar functions. Orthologs are structurally related genes in different species that are derived by a speciation event. Paralogs are structurally related genes within a single species that are derived by a duplication event.
Within a single plant species, gene duplication may cause two copies of a particular gene, giving rise to two or more genes with similar sequence and often similar function known as paralogs. A paralog is therefore a similar gene formed by duplication within the same species. Paralogs typically cluster together or in the same clade (a group of similar genes) when a gene family phylogeny is analyzed using programs such as CLUSTAL (Thompson et al. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680; Higgins et al. (1996) Methods Enzymol. 266: 383-402). Groups of similar genes can also be identified with pair-wise BLAST analysis (Feng and Doolittle (1987) J. Mol. Evol. 25: 351-360). For example, a clade of very similar MADS domain transcription factors from Arabidopsis all share a common function in flowering time (Ratcliffe et al. (2001) Plant Physiol. 126: 122-132), and a group of very similar AP2 domain transcription factors from Arabidopsis are involved in tolerance of plants to freezing (Gilmour et al. (1998) Plant J. 16: 433-442). Analysis of groups of similar genes with similar function that fall within one clade can yield sub-sequences that are particular to the clade. These sub-sequences, known as consensus sequences, can not only be used to define the sequences within each clade, but define the functions of these genes; genes within a clade may contain paralogous sequences, or orthologous sequences that share the same function (see also, for example, Mount (2001), in Bioinformatics: Sequence and Genome Analysis Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., page 543.)
Speciation, the production of new species from a parental species, can also give rise to two or more genes with similar sequence and similar function. These genes, termed orthologs, often have an identical function within their host plants and are often interchangeable between species without losing function. Because plants have common ancestors, many genes in any plant species will have a corresponding orthologous gene in another plant species. Once a phylogenic tree for a gene family of one species has been constructed using a program such as CLUSTAL (Thompson et al. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680; Higgins et al. (1996) supra) potential orthologous sequences can be placed into the phylogenetic tree and their relationship to genes from the species of interest can be determined. Orthologous sequences can also be identified by a reciprocal BLAST strategy. Once an orthologous sequence has been identified, the function of the ortholog can be deduced from the identified function of the reference sequence.
Transcription factor gene sequences are conserved across diverse eukaryotic species lines (Goodrich et al. (1993) Cell 75: 519-530; Lin et al. (1991) Nature 353: 569-571; Sadowski et al. (1988) Nature 335: 563-564). Plants are no exception to this observation; diverse plant species possess transcription factors that have similar sequences and functions.
Orthologous genes from different organisms have highly conserved functions, and very often essentially identical functions (Lee et al. (2002) Genome Res. 12: 493-502; Remm et al. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 314: 1041-1052). Paralogous genes, which have diverged through gene duplication, may retain similar functions of the encoded proteins. In such cases, paralogs can be used interchangeably with respect to certain embodiments of the instant invention (for example, transgenic expression of a coding sequence). An example of such highly related paralogs is the CBF family, with three well-defined members in Arabidopsis and at least one ortholog in Brassica napus (SEQ ID NOs: 2238, 2240, 2242, and 2244, respectively), all of which control pathways involved in both freezing and drought stress (Gilmour et al. (1998) Plant J. 16: 433-442; Jaglo et al. (1998) Plant Physiol. 127: 910-917).
The following references represent a small sampling of the many studies that demonstrate that conserved transcription factor genes from diverse species are likely to function similarly (i.e., regulate similar target sequences and control the same traits), and that transcription factors may be transformed into diverse species to confer or improve traits.
(1) The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene regulates systemic acquired resistance (SAR); over-expression of NPR1 leads to enhanced resistance in Arabidopsis. When either Arabidopsis NPR1 or the rice NPR1 ortholog was overexpressed in rice (which, as a monocot, is diverse from Arabidopsis), challenge with the rice bacterial blight pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae, the transgenic plants displayed enhanced resistance (Chern et al. (2001) Plant J. 27: 101-113). NPR1 acts through activation of expression of transcription factor genes, such as TGA2 (Fan and Dong (2002) Plant Cell 14: 1377-1389).
(2) E2F genes are involved in transcription of plant genes for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Plant E2Fs share a high degree of similarity in amino acid sequence between monocots and dicots, and are even similar to the conserved domains of the animal E2Fs. Such conservation indicates a functional similarity between plant and animal E2Fs. E2F transcription factors that regulate meristem development act through common cis-elements, and regulate related (PCNA) genes (Kosugi and Ohashi, (2002) Plant J. 29: 45-59).
(3) The ABI5 gene (ABA insensitive 5) encodes a basic leucine zipper factor required for ABA response in the seed and vegetative tissues. Co-transformation experiments with ABI5 cDNA constructs in rice protoplasts resulted in specific transactivation of the ABA-inducible wheat, Arabidopsis, bean, and barley promoters. These results demonstrate that sequentially similar ABI5 transcription factors are key targets of a conserved ABA signaling pathway in diverse plants. (Gampala et al. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 277: 1689-1694).
(4) Sequences of three Arabidopsis GAMYB-like genes were obtained on the basis of sequence similarity to GAMYB genes from barley, rice, and L. temulentum. These three Arabadopsis genes were determined to encode transcription factors (AtMYB33, AtMYB65, and AtMYB101) and could substitute for a barley GAMYB and control alpha-amylase expression (Gocal et al. (2001) Plant Physiol. 127: 1682-1693).
(5) The floral control gene LEAFY from Arabidopsis can dramatically accelerate flowering in numerous dictoyledonous plants. Constitutive expression of Arabidopsis LEAFY also caused early flowering in transgenic rice (a monocot), with a heading date that was 26-34 days earlier than that of wild-type plants. These observations indicate that floral regulatory genes from Arabidopsis are useful tools for heading date improvement in cereal crops (He et al. (2000) Transgenic Res. 9: 223-227).
(6) Bioactive gibberellins (GAs) are essential endogenous regulators of plant growth. GA signaling tends to be conserved across the plant kingdom. GA signaling is mediated via GAI, a nuclear member of the GRAS family of plant transcription factors. Arabidopsis GAI has been shown to function in rice to inhibit gibberellin response pathways (Fu et al. (2001) Plant Cell 13: 1791-1802).
(7) The Arabidopsis gene SUPERMAN (SUP), encodes a putative transcription factor that maintains the boundary between stamens and carpels. By over-expressing Arabidopsis SUP in rice, the effect of the gene's presence on whorl boundaries was shown to be conserved. This demonstrated that SUP is a conserved regulator of floral whorl boundaries and affects cell proliferation (Nandi et al. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10: 215-218).
(8) Maize, petunia and Arabidopsis myb transcription factors that regulate flavonoid biosynthesis are very genetically similar and affect the same trait in their native species, therefore sequence and function of these myb transcription factors correlate with each other in these diverse species (Borevitz et al. (2000) Plant Cell 12: 2383-2394).
(9) Wheat reduced height-1 (Rht-B1/Rht-D1) and maize dwarf-8 (d8) genes are orthologs of the Arabidopsis gibberellin insensitive (GAI) gene. Both of these genes have been used to produce dwarf grain varieties that have improved grain yield. These genes encode proteins that resemble nuclear transcription factors and contain an SH2-like domain, indicating that phosphotyrosine may participate in gibberellin signaling. Transgenic rice plants containing a mutant GAI allele from Arabidopsis have been shown to produce reduced responses to gibberellin and are dwarfed, indicating that mutant GAI orthologs could be used to increase yield in a wide range of crop species (Peng et al. (1999) Nature 400: 256-261).
Transcription factors that are homologous to the listed sequences will typically share, in at least one conserved domain, at least about 70% amino acid sequence identity, and with regard to zinc finger transcription factors, at least about 50% amino acid sequence identity. More closely related transcription factors can share at least about 70%, or about 75% or about 80% or about 90% or about 95% or about 98% or more sequence identity with the listed sequences, or with the listed sequences but excluding or outside a known consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site, or with the listed sequences excluding one or all conserved domain. Factors that are most closely related to the listed sequences share, e.g., at least about 85%, about 90% or about 95% or more % sequence identity to the listed sequences, or to the listed sequences but excluding or outside a known consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site or outside one or all conserved domain. At the nucleotide level, the sequences will typically share at least about 40% nucleotide sequence identity, preferably at least about 50%, about 60%, about 70% or about 80% sequence identity, and more preferably about 85%, about 90%, about 95% or about 97% or more sequence identity to one or more of the listed sequences, or to a listed sequence but excluding or outside a known consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site, or outside one or all conserved domain. The degeneracy of the genetic code enables major variations in the nucleotide sequence of a polynucleotide while maintaining the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein. Conserved domains within a transcription factor family may exhibit a higher degree of sequence homology, such as at least 65% amino acid sequence identity including conservative substitutions, and preferably at least 80% sequence identity, and more preferably at least 85%, or at least about 86%, or at least about 87%, or at least about 88%, or at least about 90%, or at least about 95%, or at least about 98% sequence identity. Transcription factors that are homologous to the listed sequences should share at least 30%, or at least about 60%, or at least about 75%, or at least about 80%, or at least about 90%, or at least about 95% amino acid sequence identity over the entire length of the polypeptide or the homolog.
Percent identity can be determined electronically, e.g., by using the MEGALIGN program (DNASTAR, Inc. Madison, Wis.). The MEGALIGN program can create alignments between two or more sequences according to different methods, for example, the clustal method. (See, for example, Higgins and Sharp (1988) Gene 73: 237-244.) The clustal algorithm groups sequences into clusters by examining the distances between all pairs. The clusters are aligned pairwise and then in groups. Other alignment algorithms or programs may be used, including FASTA, BLAST, or ENTREZ, FASTA and BLAST, and which may be used to calculate percent similarity. These are available as a part of the GCG sequence analysis package (University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.), and can be used with or without default settings. ENTREZ is available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information. In one embodiment, the percent identity of two sequences can be determined by the GCG program with a gap weight of 1, e.g., each amino acid gap is weighted as if it were a single amino acid or nucleotide mismatch between the two sequences (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,262,333).
Other techniques for alignment are described in Methods in Enzymology, vol. 266, Computer Methods for Macromolecular Sequence Analysis (1996), ed. Doolittle, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif., U.S.A. Preferably, an alignment program that permits gaps in the sequence is utilized to align the sequences. The Smith-Waterman is one type of algorithm that permits gaps in sequence alignments (see Shpaer (1997) Methods Mol. Biol. 70: 173-187). Also, the GAP program using the Needleman and Wunsch alignment method can be utilized to align sequences. An alternative search strategy uses MPSRCH software, which runs on a MASPAR computer. MPSRCH uses a Smith-Waterman algorithm to score sequences on a massively parallel computer. This approach improves ability to pick up distantly related matches, and is especially tolerant of small gaps and nucleotide sequence errors. Nucleic acid-encoded amino acid sequences can be used to search both protein and DNA databases.
The percentage similarity between two polypeptide sequences, e.g., sequence A and sequence B, is calculated by dividing the length of sequence A, minus the number of gap residues in sequence A, minus the number of gap residues in sequence B, into the sum of the residue matches between sequence A and sequence B, times one hundred. Gaps of low or of no similarity between the two amino acid sequences are not included in determining percentage similarity. Percent identity between polynucleotide sequences can also be counted or calculated by other methods known in the art, e.g., the Jotun Hein method. (See, e.g., Hein (1990) Methods Enzymol. 183: 626-645.) Identity between sequences can also be determined by other methods known in the art, e.g., by varying hybridization conditions (see U.S. Patent Application No. 20010010913).
The percent identity between two conserved domains of a transcription factor DNA-binding domain consensus polypeptide sequence can be as low as 16%, as exemplified in the case of GATA1 family of eukaryotic Cys2/Cys2-type zinc finger transcription factors. The DNA-binding domain consensus polypeptide sequence of the GATA1 family is CX2CX17CX2C, where X is any amino acid residue. (See, for example, Takatsuji, supra.) Other examples of such conserved consensus polypeptide sequences with low overall percent sequence identity are well known to those of skill in the art.
Thus, the invention provides methods for identifying a sequence similar or paralogous or orthologous or homologous to one or more polynucleotides as noted herein, or one or more target polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotides, or otherwise noted herein and may include linking or associating a given plant phenotype or gene function with a sequence. In the methods, a sequence database is provided (locally or across an internet or intranet) and a query is made against the sequence database using the relevant sequences herein and associated plant phenotypes or gene functions.
In addition, one or more polynucleotide sequences or one or more polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotide sequences may be used to search against a BLOCKS (Bairoch et al. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 217-221), PFAM, and other databases which contain previously identified and annotated motifs, sequences and gene functions. Methods that search for primary sequence patterns with secondary structure gap penalties (Smith et al. (1992) Protein Engineering 5: 35-51) as well as algorithms such as Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST; Altschul (1993) J. Mol. Evol. 36: 290-300; Altschul et al. (1990) supra), BLOCKS (Henikoff and Henikoff (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19: 6565-6572), Hidden Markov Models (HMM; Eddy (1996) Curr. Opin. Str. Biol. 6: 361-365; Sonnhammer et al. (1997) Proteins 28: 405-420), and the like, can be used to manipulate and analyze polynucleotide and polypeptide sequences encoded by polynucleotides. These databases, algorithms and other methods are well known in the art and are described in Ausubel et al. (1997; Short Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y., unit 7.7) and in Meyers (1995; Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Wiley VCH, New York, N.Y., p 856-853).
A further method for identifying or confirming that specific homologous sequences control the same function is by comparison of the transcript profile(s) obtained upon overexpression or knockout of two or more related transcription factors. Since transcript profiles are diagnostic for specific cellular states, one skilled in the art will appreciate that genes that have a highly similar transcript profile (e.g., with greater than 50% regulated transcripts in common, more preferably with greater than 70% regulated transcripts in common, most preferably with greater than 90% regulated transcripts in common) will have highly similar functions. Fowler et al. (2002) Plant Cell 14: 1675-79) have shown that three paralogous AP2 family genes (CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3), each of which is induced upon cold treatment, and each of which can condition improved freezing tolerance, have highly similar transcript profiles. Once a transcription factor has been shown to provide a specific function, its transcript profile becomes a diagnostic tool to determine whether putative paralogs or orthologs have the same function.
Furthermore, methods using manual alignment of sequences similar or homologous to one or more polynucleotide sequences or one or more polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotide sequences may be used to identify regions of similarity and conserved domains. Such manual methods are well-known of those of skill in the art and can include, for example, comparisons of tertiary structure between a polypeptide sequence encoded by a polynucleotide which comprises a known function with a polypeptide sequence encoded by a polynucleotide sequence which has a function not yet determined. Such examples of tertiary structure may comprise predicted alpha helices, beta-sheets, amphipathic helices, leucine zipper motifs, zinc finger motifs, proline-rich regions, cysteine repeat motifs, and the like.
Orthologs and paralogs of presently disclosed transcription factors may be cloned using compositions provided by the present invention according to methods well known in the art. cDNAs can be cloned using mRNA from a plant cell or tissue that expresses one of the present transcription factors. Appropriate mRNA sources may be identified by interrogating Northern blots with probes designed from the present transcription factor sequences, after which a library is prepared from the mRNA obtained from a positive cell or tissue. Transcription factor-encoding cDNA is then isolated using, for example, PCR, using primers designed from a presently disclosed transcription factor gene sequence, or by probing with a partial or complete cDNA or with one or more sets of degenerate probes based on the disclosed sequences. The cDNA library may be used to transform plant cells. Expression of the cDNAs of interest is detected using, for example, methods disclosed herein such as microarrays, Northern blots, quantitative PCR, or any other technique for monitoring changes in expression. Genomic clones may be isolated using similar techniques to those.
Identifying Polynucleotides or Nucleic Acids by Hybridization
Polynucleotides homologous to the sequences illustrated in the Sequence Listing and tables can be identified, e.g., by hybridization to each other under stringent or under highly stringent conditions. Single stranded polynucleotides hybridize when they associate based on a variety of well characterized physical-chemical forces, such as hydrogen bonding, solvent exclusion, base stacking and the like. The stringency of a hybridization reflects the degree of sequence identity of the nucleic acids involved, such that the higher the stringency, the more similar are the two polynucleotide strands. Stringency is influenced by a variety of factors, including temperature, salt concentration and composition, organic and non-organic additives, solvents, etc. present in both the hybridization and wash solutions and incubations (and number thereof), as described in more detail in the references cited above.
Encompassed by the invention are polynucleotide sequences that are capable of hybridizing to the claimed polynucleotide sequences, including any of the transcription factor polynucleotides within the Sequence Listing, and fragments thereof under various conditions of stringency (See, for example, Wahl and Berger (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152: 399-407; and Kimmel (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152: 507-511). In addition to the nucleotide sequences listed in Tables 4-9, full length cDNA, orthologs, and paralogs of the present nucleotide sequences may be identified and isolated using well-known methods. The cDNA libraries, orthologs, and paralogs of the present nucleotide sequences may be screened using hybridization methods to determine their utility as hybridization target or amplification probes.
With regard to hybridization, conditions that are highly stringent, and means for achieving them, are well known in the art. See, for example, Sambrook et al. (1989) “Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual” (2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory); Berger and Kimmel, eds., (1987) “Guide to Molecular Cloning Techniques”, In Methods in Enzymology:152: 467-469; and Anderson and Young (1985) “Quantitative Filter Hybridisation.” In: Hames and Higgins, ed., Nucleic Acid Hybridisation, A Practical Approach. Oxford, IRL Press, 73-111.
Stability of DNA duplexes is affected by such factors as base composition, length, and degree of base pair mismatch. Hybridization conditions may be adjusted to allow DNAs of different sequence relatedness to hybridize. The melting temperature (Tm) is defined as the temperature when 50% of the duplex molecules have dissociated into their constituent single strands. The melting temperature of a perfectly matched duplex, where the hybridization buffer contains formamide as a denaturing agent, may be estimated by the following equations:

Tm(° C.)=81.5+16.6(log [Na+])+0.41(% G+C)−0.62(% formamide)−500/L  (I) DNA-DNA:

Tm(° C.)=79.8+18.5(log [Na+])+0.58(% G+C)+0.12(% G+C)2−0.5(% formamide)−820/L  (II) DNA-RNA:

Tm(° C.)=79.8+18.5(log [Na+])+0.58(% G+C)+0.12(% G+C)2−0.35(% formamide)−820/L  (III) RNA-RNA:

where L is the length of the duplex formed, [Na+] is the molar concentration of the sodium ion in the hybridization or washing solution, and % G+C is the percentage of (guanine+cytosine) bases in the hybrid. For imperfectly matched hybrids, approximately 1° C. is required to reduce the melting temperature for each 1% mismatch.
Hybridization experiments are generally conducted in a buffer of pH between 6.8 to 7.4, although the rate of hybridization is nearly independent of pH at ionic strengths likely to be used in the hybridization buffer (Anderson et al. (1985) supra). In addition, one or more of the following may be used to reduce non-specific hybridization: sonicated salmon sperm DNA or another non-complementary DNA, bovine serum albumin, sodium pyrophosphate, sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), polyvinyl-pyrrolidone, ficoll and Denhardt's solution. Dextran sulfate and polyethylene glycol 6000 act to exclude DNA from solution, thus raising the effective probe DNA concentration and the hybridization signal within a given unit of time. In some instances, conditions of even greater stringency may be desirable or required to reduce non-specific and/or background hybridization. These conditions may be created with the use of higher temperature, lower ionic strength and higher concentration of a denaturing agent such as formamide.
Stringency conditions can be adjusted to screen for moderately similar fragments such as homologous sequences from distantly related organisms, or to highly similar fragments such as genes that duplicate functional enzymes from closely related organisms. The stringency can be adjusted either during the hybridization step or in the post-hybridization washes. Salt concentration, formamide concentration, hybridization temperature and probe lengths are variables that can be used to alter stringency (as described by the formula above). As a general guidelines high stringency is typically performed at Tm−5° C. to Tm−20° C., moderate stringency at Tm−20° C. to Tm−35° C. and low stringency at Tm−35° C. to Tm−50° C. for duplex >150 base pairs. Hybridization may be performed at low to moderate stringency (25-50° C. below Tm), followed by post-hybridization washes at increasing stringencies. Maximum rates of hybridization in solution are determined empirically to occur at Tm−25° C. for DNA-DNA duplex and Tm−15° C. for RNA-DNA duplex. Optionally, the degree of dissociation may be assessed after each wash step to determine the need for subsequent, higher stringency wash steps.
High stringency conditions may be used to select for nucleic acid sequences with high degrees of identity to the disclosed sequences. An example of stringent hybridization conditions obtained in a filter-based method such as a Southern or northern blot for hybridization of complementary nucleic acids that have more than 100 complementary residues is about 5° C. to 20° C. lower than the thermal melting point (Tm) for the specific sequence at a defined ionic strength and pH. Conditions used for hybridization may include about 0.02 M to about 0.15 M sodium chloride, about 0.5% to about 5% casein, about 0.02% SDS or about 0.1% N-laurylsarcosine, about 0.001 M to about 0.03 M sodium citrate, at hybridization temperatures between about 50° C. and about 70° C. More preferably, high stringency conditions are about 0.02 M sodium chloride, about 0.5% casein, about 0.02% SDS, about 0.001 M sodium citrate, at a temperature of about 50° C. Nucleic acid molecules that hybridize under stringent conditions will typically hybridize to a probe based on either the entire DNA molecule or selected portions, e.g., to a unique subsequence, of the DNA.
Stringent salt concentration will ordinarily be less than about 750 mM NaCl and 75 mM trisodium citrate. Increasingly stringent conditions may be obtained with less than about 500 mM NaCl and 50 mM trisodium citrate, to even greater stringency with less than about 250 mM NaCl and 25 mM trisodium citrate. Low stringency hybridization can be obtained in the absence of organic solvent, e.g., formamide, whereas high stringency hybridization may be obtained in the presence of at least about 35% formamide, and more preferably at least about 50% formamide. Stringent temperature conditions will ordinarily include temperatures of at least about 30° C., more preferably of at least about 37° C., and most preferably of at least about 42° C. with formamide present. Varying additional parameters, such as hybridization time, the concentration of detergent, e.g., sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and ionic strength, are well known to those skilled in the art. Various levels of stringency are accomplished by combining these various conditions as needed.
The washing steps that follow hybridization may also vary in stringency; the post-hybridization wash steps primarily determine hybridization specificity, with the most critical factors being temperature and the ionic strength of the final wash solution. Wash stringency can be increased by decreasing salt concentration or by increasing temperature. Stringent salt concentration for the wash steps will preferably be less than about 30 mM NaCl and 3 mM trisodium citrate, and most preferably less than about 15 mM NaCl and 1.5 mM trisodium citrate.
Thus, hybridization and wash conditions that may be used to bind and remove polynucleotides with less than the desired homology to the nucleic acid sequences or their complements that encode the present transcription factors include, for example:
6×SSC at 65° C.;
50% formamide, 4×SSC at 42° C.; or
0.5×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C.;
with, for example, two wash steps of 10-30 minutes each. Useful variations on these conditions will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.
A person of skill in the art would not expect substantial variation among polynucleotide species encompassed within the scope of the present invention because the highly stringent conditions set forth in the above formulae yield structurally similar polynucleotides.
If desired, one may employ wash steps of even greater stringency, including about 0.2×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C. and washing twice, each wash step being about 30 min, or about 0.1×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C. and washing twice for 30 min. The temperature for the wash solutions will ordinarily be at least about 25° C., and for greater stringency at least about 42° C. Hybridization stringency may be increased further by using the same conditions as in the hybridization steps, with the wash temperature raised about 3° C. to about 5° C., and stringency may be increased even further by using the same conditions except the wash temperature is raised about 6° C. to about 9° C. For identification of less closely related homologs, wash steps may be performed at a lower temperature, e.g., 50° C.
An example of a low stringency wash step employs a solution and conditions of at least 25° C. in mM NaCl, 3 mM trisodium citrate, and 0.1% SDS over 30 min. Greater stringency may be obtained at 42° C. in 15 mM NaCl, with 1.5 mM trisodium citrate, and 0.1% SDS over 30 min. Even higher stringency wash conditions are obtained at 65° C.-68° C. in a solution of 15 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM trisodium citrate, and 0.1% SDS. Wash procedures will generally employ at least two final wash steps. Additional variations on these conditions will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art (see, for example, U.S. Patent Application No. 20010010913).
Stringency conditions can be selected such that an oligonucleotide that is perfectly complementary to the coding oligonucleotide hybridizes to the coding oligonucleotide with at least about a 5-10× higher signal to noise ratio than the ratio for hybridization of the perfectly complementary oligonucleotide to a nucleic acid encoding a transcription factor known as of the filing date of the application. It may be desirable to select conditions for a particular assay such that a higher signal to noise ratio, that is, about 15× or more, is obtained. Accordingly, a subject nucleic acid will hybridize to a unique coding oligonucleotide with at least a 2× or greater signal to noise ratio as compared to hybridization of the coding oligonucleotide to a nucleic acid encoding known polypeptide. The particular signal will depend on the label used in the relevant assay, e.g., a fluorescent label, a colorimetric label, a radioactive label, or the like. Labeled hybridization or PCR probes for detecting related polynucleotide sequences may be produced by oligolabeling, nick translation, end-labeling, or PCR amplification using a labeled nucleotide.
Encompassed by the invention are polynucleotide sequences encoding polypeptides capable of regulating transcription, said polynucleotide sequences being capable of hybridizing to the claimed polynucleotide sequences, including those listed in the Sequence Listing, or polynucleotides that encode the polypeptides listed in the Sequence Listing, and specifically SEQ ID NOs: 1-2237, and fragments thereof under various conditions of stringency. (See, e.g., Wahl and Berger (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152: 399-407; Kimmel (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152: 507-511.) Estimates of homology are provided by either DNA-DNA or DNA-RNA hybridization under conditions of stringency as is well understood by those skilled in the art (Hames and Higgins, Eds. (1985) Nucleic Acid Hybridisation, IRL Press, Oxford, U.K.). Stringency conditions can be adjusted to screen for moderately similar fragments, such as homologous sequences from distantly related organisms, to highly similar fragments, such as genes that duplicate functional enzymes from closely related organisms. Post-hybridization washes determine stringency conditions.
Identifying Polynucleotides or Nucleic Acids with Expression Libraries
In addition to hybridization methods, transcription factor homolog polypeptides can be obtained by screening an expression library using antibodies specific for one or more transcription factors. With the provision herein of the disclosed transcription factor, and transcription factor homolog nucleic acid sequences, the encoded polypeptide(s) can be expressed and purified in a heterologous expression system (e.g., E. coli) and used to raise antibodies (monoclonal or polyclonal) specific for the polypeptide(s) in question. Antibodies can also be raised against synthetic peptides derived from transcription factor, or transcription factor homolog, amino acid sequences. Methods of raising antibodies are well known in the art and are described in Harlow and Lane (1988), Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York. Such antibodies can then be used to screen an expression library produced from the plant from which it is desired to clone additional transcription factor homologs, using the methods described above. The selected cDNAs can be confirmed by sequencing and enzymatic activity.
Sequence Variations
It will readily be appreciated by those of skill in the art, that any of a variety of polynucleotide sequences are capable of encoding the transcription factors and transcription factor homolog polypeptides of the invention. Due to the degeneracy of the genetic code, many different polynucleotides can encode identical and/or substantially similar polypeptides in addition to those sequences illustrated in the Sequence Listing. Nucleic acids having a sequence that differs from the sequences shown in the Sequence Listing, or complementary sequences, that encode functionally equivalent peptides (i.e., peptides having some degree of equivalent or similar biological activity) but differ in sequence from the sequence shown in the Sequence Listing due to degeneracy in the genetic code, are also within the scope of the invention.
Altered polynucleotide sequences encoding polypeptides include those sequences with deletions, insertions, or substitutions of different nucleotides, resulting in a polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide with at least one functional characteristic of the instant polypeptides. Included within this definition are polymorphisms which may or may not be readily detectable using a particular oligonucleotide probe of the polynucleotide encoding the instant polypeptides, and improper or unexpected hybridization to allelic variants, with a locus other than the normal chromosomal locus for the polynucleotide sequence encoding the instant polypeptides.
Allelic variant refers to any of two or more alternative forms of a gene occupying the same chromosomal locus. Allelic variation arises naturally through mutation, and may result in phenotypic polymorphism within populations. Gene mutations can be silent (i.e., no change in the encoded polypeptide) or may encode polypeptides having altered amino acid sequence. The term allelic variant is also used herein to denote a protein encoded by an allelic variant of a gene. Splice variant refers to alternative forms of RNA transcribed from a gene. Splice variation arises naturally through use of alternative splicing sites within a transcribed RNA molecule, or less commonly between separately transcribed RNA molecules, and may result in several mRNAs transcribed from the same gene. Splice variants may encode polypeptides having altered amino acid sequence. The term splice variant is also used herein to denote a protein encoded by a splice variant of an mRNA transcribed from a gene.
Those skilled in the art would recognize that, for example, G47, SEQ ID NO: 12, represents a single transcription factor; allelic variation and alternative splicing may be expected to occur. Allelic variants of SEQ ID NO: 11 can be cloned by probing cDNA or genomic libraries from different individual organisms according to standard procedures. Allelic variants of the DNA sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 11, including those containing silent mutations and those in which mutations result in amino acid sequence changes, are within the scope of the present invention, as are proteins which are allelic variants of SEQ ID NO: 12. cDNAs generated from alternatively spliced mRNAs, which retain the properties of the transcription factor are included within the scope of the present invention, as are polypeptides encoded by such cDNAs and mRNAs. Allelic variants and splice variants of these sequences can be cloned by probing cDNA or genomic libraries from different individual organisms or tissues according to standard procedures known in the art (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,388,064).
Thus, in addition to the sequences set forth in the Sequence Listing, the invention also encompasses related nucleic acid molecules that include allelic or splice variants of SEQ ID NO: 2N−1, where N=1-335, sequences that are orthologous to SEQ ID NOs: 761-1348, 1557-2101, and 2124-2237), sequences that are orthologous to paralogous to SEQ ID NOs: 1349-1556, variant sequences that have been shown to confer an altered trait listed in Table 4 (SEQ ID NOs: 2102-2123) listed in the Sequence Listing, and sequences that are complementary to any of the above nucleotide sequences. Related nucleic acid molecules also include nucleotide sequences encoding a polypeptide comprising or consisting essentially of a substitution, modification, addition and/or deletion of one or more amino acid residues compared to the polypeptides as set forth in the Sequence Listing. Such related polypeptides may comprise, for example, additions and/or deletions of one or more N-linked or O-linked glycosylation sites, or an addition and/or a deletion of one or more cysteine residues.
For example, Table 1 illustrates, e.g., that the codons AGC, AGT, TCA, TCC, TCG, and TCT all encode the same amino acid: serine. Accordingly, at each position in the sequence where there is a codon encoding serine, any of the above trinucleotide sequences can be used without altering the encoded polypeptide.








TABLE 1





Amino acid
Possible Codons



















Alanine
Ala
A
GCA GCC GCG GCU



 


Cysteine
Cys
C
TGC TGT


 


Aspartic acid
Asp
D
GAC GAT


 


Glutamic acid
Glu
E
GAA GAG


 


Phenylalanine
Phe
F
TTC TTT


 


Glycine
Gly
G
GGA GGC GGG GGT


 


Histidine
His
H
CAC CAT


 


Isoleucine
Ile
I
ATA ATC ATT


 


Lysine
Lys
K
AAA AAG


 


Leucine
Leu
L
TTA TTG CTA CTC CTG CTT


 


Methionine
Met
M
ATG


 


Asparagine
Asn
N
AAC AAT


 


Proline
Pro
P
CCA CCC CCG CCT


 


Glutamine
Gln
Q
CAA CAG


 


Arginine
Arg
R
AGA AGG CGA CGC CGG CGT


 


Serine
Ser
S
AGC AGT TCA TCC TCG TCT


 


Threonine
Thr
T
ACA ACC ACG ACT


 


Valine
Val
V
GTA GTC GTG GTT


 


Tryptophan
Trp
W
TGG


 


Tyrosine
Tyr
Y
TAC TAT









Sequence alterations that do not change the amino acid sequence encoded by the polynucleotide are termed “silent” variations. With the exception of the codons ATG and TGG, encoding methionine and tryptophan, respectively, any of the possible codons for the same amino acid can be substituted by a variety of techniques, e.g., site-directed mutagenesis, available in the art. Accordingly, any and all such variations of a sequence selected from the above table are a feature of the invention.
In addition to silent variations, other conservative variations that alter one, or a few amino acids in the encoded polypeptide, can be made without altering the function of the polypeptide, these conservative variants are, likewise, a feature of the invention.
For example, substitutions, deletions and insertions introduced into the sequences provided in the Sequence Listing, are also envisioned by the invention. Such sequence modifications can be engineered into a sequence by site-directed mutagenesis (Wu (ed.) Methods Enzymol. (1993) vol. 217, Academic Press) or the other methods noted below. Amino acid substitutions are typically of single residues; insertions usually will be on the order of about from 1 to 10 amino acid residues; and deletions will range about from 1 to 30 residues. In preferred embodiments, deletions or insertions are made in adjacent pairs, e.g., a deletion of two residues or insertion of two residues. Substitutions, deletions, insertions or any combination thereof can be combined to arrive at a sequence. The mutations that are made in the polynucleotide encoding the transcription factor should not place the sequence out of reading frame and should not create complementary regions that could produce secondary mRNA structure. Preferably, the polypeptide encoded by the DNA performs the desired function.
Conservative substitutions are those in which at least one residue in the amino acid sequence has been removed and a different residue inserted in its place. Such substitutions generally are made in accordance with the Table 2 when it is desired to maintain the activity of the protein. Table 2 shows amino acids which can be substituted for an amino acid in a protein and which are typically regarded as conservative substitutions.










TABLE 2








Conservative



Residue
Substitutions









Ala
Ser



Arg
Lys



Asn
Gln; His



Asp
Glu



Gln
Asn



Cys
Ser



Glu
Asp



Gly
Pro



His
Asn; Gln



Ile
Leu, Val



Leu
Ile; Val



Lys
Arg; Gln



Met
Leu; Ile



Phe
Met; Leu; Tyr



Ser
Thr; Gly



Thr
Ser; Val



Trp
Tyr



Tyr
Trp; Phe



Val
Ile; Leu










Similar substitutions are those in which at least one residue in the amino acid sequence has been removed and a different residue inserted in its place. Such substitutions generally are made in accordance with the Table 3 when it is desired to maintain the activity of the protein. Table 3 shows amino acids which can be substituted for an amino acid in a protein and which are typically regarded as structural and functional substitutions. For example, a residue in column 1 of Table 3 may be substituted with a residue in column 2; in addition, a residue in column 2 of Table 3 may be substituted with the residue of column 1.










TABLE 3







Residue
Similar Substitutions









Ala
Ser; Thr; Gly; Val; Leu; Ile



Arg
Lys; His; Gly



Asn
Gln; His; Gly; Ser; Thr



Asp
Glu, Ser; Thr



Gln
Asn; Ala



Cys
Ser; Gly



Glu
Asp



Gly
Pro; Arg



His
Asn; Gln; Tyr; Phe; Lys; Arg



Ile
Ala; Leu; Val; Gly; Met



Leu
Ala; Ile; Val; Gly; Met



Lys
Arg; His; Gln; Gly; Pro



Met
Leu; Ile; Phe



Phe
Met; Leu; Tyr; Trp; His; Val; Ala



Ser
Thr; Gly; Asp; Ala; Val; Ile; His



Thr
Ser; Val; Ala; Gly



Trp
Tyr; Phe; His



Tyr
Trp; Phe; His



Val
Ala; Ile; Leu; Gly; Thr; Ser; Glu










Substitutions that are less conservative than those in Table 2 can be selected by picking residues that differ more significantly in their effect on maintaining (a) the structure of the polypeptide backbone in the area of the substitution, for example, as a sheet or helical conformation, (b) the charge or hydrophobicity of the molecule at the target site, or (c) the bulk of the side chain. The substitutions which in general are expected to produce the greatest changes in protein properties will be those in which (a) a hydrophilic residue, e.g., seryl or threonyl, is substituted for (or by) a hydrophobic residue, e.g., leucyl, isoleucyl, phenylalanyl, valyl or alanyl; (b) a cysteine or proline is substituted for (or by) any other residue; (c) a residue having an electropositive side chain, e.g., lysyl, arginyl, or histidyl, is substituted for (or by) an electronegative residue, e.g., glutamyl or aspartyl; or (d) a residue having a bulky side chain, e.g., phenylalanine, is substituted for (or by) one not having a side chain, e.g., glycine.
Further Modifying Sequences of the Invention—Mutation/Forced Evolution
In addition to generating silent or conservative substitutions as noted, above, the present invention optionally includes methods of modifying the sequences of the Sequence Listing. In the methods, nucleic acid or protein modification methods are used to alter the given sequences to produce new sequences and/or to chemically or enzymatically modify given sequences to change the properties of the nucleic acids or proteins.
Thus, in one embodiment, given nucleic acid sequences are modified, e.g., according to standard mutagenesis or artificial evolution methods to produce modified sequences. The modified sequences may be created using purified natural polynucleotides isolated from any organism or may be synthesized from purified compositions and chemicals using chemical means well know to those of skill in the art. For example, Ausubel, supra, provides additional details on mutagenesis methods. Artificial forced evolution methods are described, for example, by Stemmer (1994) Nature 370: 389-391, Stemmer (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91: 10747-10751, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,811,238, 5,837,500, and 6,242,568. Methods for engineering synthetic transcription factors and other polypeptides are described, for example, by Zhang et al. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275: 33850-33860, Liu et al. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276: 11323-11334, and Isalan et al. (2001) Nature Biotechnol. 19: 656-660. Many other mutation and evolution methods are also available and expected to be within the skill of the practitioner.
Similarly, chemical or enzymatic alteration of expressed nucleic acids and polypeptides can be performed by standard methods. For example, sequence can be modified by addition of lipids, sugars, peptides, organic or inorganic compounds, by the inclusion of modified nucleotides or amino acids, or the like. For example, protein modification techniques are illustrated in Ausubel, supra. Further details on chemical and enzymatic modifications can be found herein. These modification methods can be used to modify any given sequence, or to modify any sequence produced by the various mutation and artificial evolution modification methods noted herein.
Accordingly, the invention provides for modification of any given nucleic acid by mutation, evolution, chemical or enzymatic modification, or other available methods, as well as for the products produced by practicing such methods, e.g., using the sequences herein as a starting substrate for the various modification approaches.
For example, optimized coding sequence containing codons preferred by a particular prokaryotic or eukaryotic host can be used e.g., to increase the rate of translation or to produce recombinant RNA transcripts having desirable properties, such as a longer half-life, as compared with transcripts produced using a non-optimized sequence. Translation stop codons can also be modified to reflect host preference. For example, preferred stop codons for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammals are TAA and TGA, respectively. The preferred stop codon for monocotyledonous plants is TGA, whereas insects and E. coli prefer to use TAA as the stop codon.
The polynucleotide sequences of the present invention can also be engineered in order to alter a coding sequence for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to, alterations which modify the sequence to facilitate cloning, processing and/or expression of the gene product. For example, alterations are optionally introduced using techniques which are well known in the art, e.g., site-directed mutagenesis, to insert new restriction sites, to alter glycosylation patterns, to change codon preference, to introduce splice sites, etc.
Furthermore, a fragment or domain derived from any of the polypeptides of the invention can be combined with domains derived from other transcription factors or synthetic domains to modify the biological activity of a transcription factor. For instance, a DNA-binding domain derived from a transcription factor of the invention can be combined with the activation domain of another transcription factor or with a synthetic activation domain. A transcription activation domain assists in initiating transcription from a DNA-binding site. Examples include the transcription activation region of VP16 or GAL4 (Moore et al. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 376-381; Aoyama et al. (1995) Plant Cell 7: 1773-1785), peptides derived from bacterial sequences (Ma and Ptashne (1987) Cell 51: 113-119) and synthetic peptides (Giniger and Ptashne (1987) Nature 330: 670-672).
Expression and Modification of Polypeptides
Typically, polynucleotide sequences of the invention are incorporated into recombinant DNA (or RNA) molecules that direct expression of polypeptides of the invention in appropriate host cells, transgenic plants, in vitro translation systems, or the like. Due to the inherent degeneracy of the genetic code, nucleic acid sequences which encode substantially the same or a functionally equivalent amino acid sequence can be substituted for any listed sequence to provide for cloning and expressing the relevant homolog.
The transgenic plants of the present invention comprising recombinant polynucleotide sequences are generally derived from parental plants, which may themselves be non-transformed (or non-transgenic) plants. These transgenic plants may either have a transcription factor gene “knocked out” (for example, with a genomic insertion by homologous recombination, an antisense or ribozyme construct) or expressed to a normal or wild-type extent. However, overexpressing transgenic “progeny” plants will exhibit greater mRNA levels, wherein the mRNA encodes a transcription factor, that is, a DNA-binding protein that is capable of binding to a DNA regulatory sequence and inducing transcription, and preferably, expression of a plant trait gene. Preferably, the mRNA expression level will be at least three-fold greater than that of the parental plant, or more preferably at least ten-fold greater mRNA levels compared to said parental plant, and most preferably at least fifty-fold greater compared to said parental plant.
Vectors, Promoters, and Expression Systems
The present invention includes recombinant constructs comprising one or more of the nucleic acid sequences herein. The constructs typically comprise a vector, such as a plasmid, a cosmid, a phage, a virus (e.g., a plant virus), a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC), a yeast artificial chromosome (YAC), or the like, into which a nucleic acid sequence of the invention has been inserted, in a forward or reverse orientation. In a preferred aspect of this embodiment, the construct further comprises regulatory sequences, including, for example, a promoter, operably linked to the sequence. Large numbers of suitable vectors and promoters are known to those of skill in the art, and are commercially available.
General texts that describe molecular biological techniques useful herein, including the use and production of vectors, promoters and many other relevant topics, include Berger, Sambrook, supra and Ausubel, supra. Any of the identified sequences can be incorporated into a cassette or vector, e.g., for expression in plants. A number of expression vectors suitable for stable transformation of plant cells or for the establishment of transgenic plants have been described including those described in Weissbach and Weissbach (1989) Methods for Plant Molecular Biology, Academic Press, and Gelvin et al. (1990) Plant Molecular Biology Manual, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Specific examples include those derived from a Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, as well as those disclosed by Herrera-Estrella et al. (1983) Nature 303: 209, Bevan (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12: 8711-8721, Klee (1985) Bio/Technology 3: 637-642, for dicotyledonous plants.
Alternatively, non-Ti vectors can be used to transfer the DNA into monocotyledonous plants and cells by using free DNA delivery techniques. Such methods can involve, for example, the use of liposomes, electroporation, microprojectile bombardment, silicon carbide whiskers, and viruses. By using these methods transgenic plants such as wheat, rice (Christou (1991) Bio/Technology 9: 957-962) and corn (Gordon-Kamm (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618) can be produced. An immature embryo can also be a good target tissue for monocots for direct DNA delivery techniques by using the particle gun (Weeks et al. (1993) Plant Physiol. 102: 1077-1084; Vasil (1993) Bio/Technology 10: 667-674; Wan and Lemeaux (1994) Plant Physiol. 104: 3748, and for Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer (Ishida et al. (1996) Nature Biotechnol. 14: 745-750).
Typically, plant transformation vectors include one or more cloned plant coding sequence (genomic or cDNA) under the transcriptional control of 5′ and 3′ regulatory sequences and a dominant selectable marker. Such plant transformation vectors typically also contain a promoter (e.g., a regulatory region controlling inducible or constitutive, environmentally-or developmentally-regulated, or cell- or tissue-specific expression), a transcription initiation start site, an RNA processing signal (such as intron splice sites), a transcription termination site, and/or a polyadenylation signal.
A potential utility for the transcription factor polynucleotides disclosed herein is the isolation of promoter elements from these genes that can be used to program expression in plants of any genes. Each transcription factor gene disclosed herein is expressed in a unique fashion, as determined by promoter elements located upstream of the start of translation, and additionally within an intron of the transcription factor gene or downstream of the termination codon of the gene. As is well known in the art, for a significant portion of genes, the promoter sequences are located entirely in the region directly upstream of the start of translation. In such cases, typically the promoter sequences are located within 2.0 kb of the start of translation, or within 1.5 kb of the start of translation, frequently within 1.0 kb of the start of translation, and sometimes within 0.5 kb of the start of translation.
The promoter sequences can be isolated according to methods known to one skilled in the art.
Examples of constitutive plant promoters which can be useful for expressing the TF sequence include: the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter, which confers constitutive, high-level expression in most plant tissues (see, e.g., Odell et al. (1985) Nature 313: 810-812); the nopaline synthase promoter (An et al. (1988) Plant Physiol. 88: 547-552); and the octopine synthase promoter (Fromm et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 977-984).
A variety of plant gene promoters that regulate gene expression in response to environmental, hormonal, chemical, developmental signals, and in a tissue-active manner can be used for expression of a TF sequence in plants. Choice of a promoter is based largely on the phenotype of interest and is determined by such factors as tissue (e.g., seed, fruit, root, pollen, vascular tissue, flower, carpel, etc.), inducibility (e.g., in response to wounding, heat, cold, drought, light, pathogens, etc.), timing, developmental stage, and the like. Numerous known promoters have been characterized and can favorably be employed to promote expression of a polynucleotide of the invention in a transgenic plant or cell of interest. For example, tissue specific promoters include: seed-specific promoters (such as the napin, phaseolin or DC3 promoter described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,773,697), fruit-specific promoters that are active during fruit ripening (such as the dru 1 promoter (U.S. Pat. No. 5,783,393), or the 2A11 promoter (U.S. Pat. No. 4,943,674) and the tomato polygalacturonase promoter (Bird et al. (1988) Plant Mol. Biol. 11: 651-662), root-specific promoters, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,618,988, 5,837,848 and 5,905,186, pollen-active promoters such as PTA29, PTA26 and PTA13 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,929), promoters active in vascular tissue (Ringli and Keller (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 37: 977-988), flower-specific (Kaiser et al. (1995) Plant Mol. Biol. 28: 231-243), pollen (Baerson et al. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 26: 1947-1959), carpels (Ohl et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 837-848), pollen and ovules (Baerson et al. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 22: 255-267), auxin-inducible promoters (such as that described in van der Kop et al. (1999) Plant Mol. Biol. 39: 979-990 or Baumann et al., (1999) Plant Cell 11: 323-334), cytokinin-inducible promoter (Guevara-Garcia (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38: 743-753), promoters responsive to gibberellin (Shi et al. (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38: 1053-1060, Willmott et al. (1998) Plant Molec. Biol. 38: 817-825) and the like. Additional promoters are those that elicit expression in response to heat (Ainley et al. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 22: 13-23), light (e.g., the pea rbcS-3A promoter, Kuhlemeier et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 471-478, and the maize rbcS promoter, Schaffner and Sheen (1991) Plant Cell 3: 997-1012); wounding (e.g., wunl, Siebertz et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 961-968); pathogens (such as the PR-1 promoter described in Buchel et al. (1999) Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 387-396, and the PDF1.2 promoter described in Manners et al. (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38: 1071-1080), and chemicals such as methyl jasmonate or salicylic acid (Gatz (1997) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 89-108). In addition, the timing of the expression can be controlled by using promoters such as those acting at senescence (Gan and Amasino (1995) Science 270: 1986-1988); or late seed development (Odell et al. (1994) Plant Physiol. 106: 447458).
Plant expression vectors can also include RNA processing signals that can be positioned within, upstream or downstream of the coding sequence. In addition, the expression vectors can include additional regulatory sequences from the 3′-untranslated region of plant genes, e.g., a 3′ terminator region to increase mRNA stability of the mRNA, such as the PI-II terminator region of potato or the octopine or nopaline synthase 3′ terminator regions.
Additional Expression Elements
Specific initiation signals can aid in efficient translation of coding sequences. These signals can include, e.g., the ATG initiation codon and adjacent sequences. In cases where a coding sequence, its initiation codon and upstream sequences are inserted into the appropriate expression vector, no additional translational control signals may be needed. However, in cases where only coding sequence (e.g., a mature protein coding sequence), or a portion thereof, is inserted, exogenous transcriptional control signals including the ATG initiation codon can be separately provided. The initiation codon is provided in the correct reading frame to facilitate transcription. Exogenous transcriptional elements and initiation codons can be of various origins, both natural and synthetic. The efficiency of expression can be enhanced by the inclusion of enhancers appropriate to the cell system in use.
Expression Hosts
The present invention also relates to host cells which are transduced with vectors of the invention, and the production of polypeptides of the invention (including fragments thereof) by recombinant techniques. Host cells are genetically engineered (i.e., nucleic acids are introduced, e.g., transduced, transformed or transfected) with the vectors of this invention, which may be, for example, a cloning vector or an expression vector comprising the relevant nucleic acids herein. The vector is optionally a plasmid, a viral particle, a phage, a naked nucleic acid, etc. The engineered host cells can be cultured in conventional nutrient media modified as appropriate for activating promoters, selecting transformants, or amplifying the relevant gene. The culture conditions, such as temperature, pH and the like, are those previously used with the host cell selected for expression, and will be apparent to those skilled in the art and in the references cited herein, including, Sambrook, supra and Ausubel, supra.
The host cell can be a eukaryotic cell, such as a yeast cell, or a plant cell, or the host cell can be a prokaryotic cell, such as a bacterial cell. Plant protoplasts are also suitable for some applications. For example, the DNA fragments are introduced into plant tissues, cultured plant cells or plant protoplasts by standard methods including electroporation (Fromm et al. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 82: 5824-5828, infection by viral vectors such as cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) (Hohn et al. (1982) Molecular Biology of Plant Tumors Academic Press, New York, N.Y., pp. 549-560; U.S. Pat. No. 4,407,956), high velocity ballistic penetration by small particles with the nucleic acid either within the matrix of small beads or particles, or on the surface (Klein et al. (1987) Nature 327: 70-73), use of pollen as vector (WO 85/01856), or use of Agrobacterium tumefaciens or A. rhizogenes carrying a T-DNA plasmid in which DNA fragments are cloned. The T-DNA plasmid is transmitted to plant cells upon infection by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and a portion is stably integrated into the plant genome (Horsch et al. (1984) Science 233: 496-498; Fraley et al. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 80: 4803-4807).
The cell can include a nucleic acid of the invention that encodes a polypeptide, wherein the cell expresses a polypeptide of the invention. The cell can also include vector sequences, or the like. Furthermore, cells and transgenic plants that include any polypeptide or nucleic acid above or throughout this specification, e.g., produced by transduction of a vector of the invention, are an additional feature of the invention.
For long-term, high-yield production of recombinant proteins, stable expression can be used. Host cells transformed with a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide of the invention are optionally cultured under conditions suitable for the expression and recovery of the encoded protein from cell culture. The protein or fragment thereof produced by a recombinant cell may be secreted, membrane-bound, or contained intracellularly, depending on the sequence and/or the vector used. As will be understood by those of skill in the art, expression vectors containing polynucleotides encoding mature proteins of the invention can be designed with signal sequences which direct secretion of the mature polypeptides through a prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell membrane.
Modified Amino Acid Residues
Polypeptides of the invention may contain one or more modified amino acid residues. The presence of modified amino acids may be advantageous in, for example, increasing polypeptide half-life, reducing polypeptide antigenicity or toxicity, increasing polypeptide storage stability, or the like. Amino acid residue(s) are modified, for example, co-translationally or post-translationally during recombinant production or modified by synthetic or chemical means.
Non-limiting examples of a modified amino acid residue include incorporation or other use of acetylated amino acids, glycosylated amino acids, sulfated amino acids, prenylated (e.g., farnesylated, geranylgeranylated) amino acids, PEG modified (e.g., “PEGylated”) amino acids, biotinylated amino acids, carboxylated amino acids, phosphorylated amino acids, etc. References adequate to guide one of skill in the modification of amino acid residues are replete throughout the literature.
The modified amino acid residues may prevent or increase affinity of the polypeptide for another molecule, including, but not limited to, polynucleotide, proteins, carbohydrates, lipids and lipid derivatives, and other organic or synthetic compounds.
Identification of Additional Factors
A transcription factor provided by the present invention can also be used to identify additional endogenous or exogenous molecules that can affect a phentoype or trait of interest. On the one hand, such molecules include organic (small or large molecules) and/or inorganic compounds that affect expression of (i.e., regulate) a particular transcription factor. Alternatively, such molecules include endogenous molecules that are acted upon either at a transcriptional level by a transcription factor of the invention to modify a phenotype as desired. For example, the transcription factors can be employed to identify one or more downstream genes that are subject to a regulatory effect of the transcription factor. In one approach, a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog of the invention is expressed in a host cell, e.g., a transgenic plant cell, tissue or explant, and expression products, either RNA or protein, of likely or random targets are monitored, e.g., by hybridization to a microarray of nucleic acid probes corresponding to genes expressed in a tissue or cell type of interest, by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of protein products, or by any other method known in the art for assessing expression of gene products at the level of RNA or protein. Alternatively, a transcription factor of the invention can be used to identify promoter sequences (such as binding sites on DNA sequences) involved in the regulation of a downstream target. After identifying a promoter sequence, interactions between the transcription factor and the promoter sequence can be modified by changing specific nucleotides in the promoter sequence or specific amino acids in the transcription factor that interact with the promoter sequence to alter a plant trait. Typically, transcription factor DNA-binding sites are identified by gel shift assays. After identifying the promoter regions, the promoter region sequences can be employed in double-stranded DNA arrays to identify molecules that affect the interactions of the transcription factors with their promoters (Bulyk et al. (1999) Nature Biotechnol. 17: 573-577).
The identified transcription factors are also useful to identify proteins that modify the activity of the transcription factor. Such modification can occur by covalent modification, such as by phosphorylation, or by protein-protein (homo or-heteropolymer) interactions. Any method suitable for detecting protein-protein interactions can be employed. Among the methods that can be employed are co-immunoprecipitation, cross-linking and co-purification through gradients or chromatographic columns, and the two-hybrid yeast system.
The two-hybrid system detects protein interactions in vivo and is described in Chien et al. ((1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88: 9578-9582) and is commercially available from Clontech (Palo Alto, Calif.). In such a system, plasmids are constructed that encode two hybrid proteins: one consists of the DNA-binding domain of a transcription activator protein fused to the TF polypeptide and the other consists of the transcription activator protein's activation domain fused to an unknown protein that is encoded by a cDNA that has been recombined into the plasmid as part of a cDNA library. The DNA-binding domain fusion plasmid and the cDNA library are transformed into a strain of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae that contains a reporter gene (e.g., lacZ) whose regulatory region contains the transcription activator's binding site. Either hybrid protein alone cannot activate transcription of the reporter gene. Interaction of the two hybrid proteins reconstitutes the functional activator protein and results in expression of the reporter gene, which is detected by an assay for the reporter gene product. Then, the library plasmids responsible for reporter gene expression are isolated and sequenced to identify the proteins encoded by the library plasmids. After identifying proteins that interact with the transcription factors, assays for compounds that interfere with the TF protein-protein interactions can be preformed.
Identification of Modulators
In addition to the intracellular molecules described above, extracellular molecules that alter activity or expression of a transcription factor, either directly or indirectly, can be identified. For example, the methods can entail first placing a candidate molecule in contact with a plant or plant cell. The molecule can be introduced by topical administration, such as spraying or soaking of a plant, or incubating a plant in a solution containing the molecule, and then the molecule's effect on the expression or activity of the TF polypeptide or the expression of the polynucleotide monitored. Changes in the expression of the TF polypeptide can be monitored by use of polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies, gel electrophoresis or the like. Changes in the expression of the corresponding polynucleotide sequence can be detected by use of microarrays, Northerns, quantitative PCR, or any other technique for monitoring changes in mRNA expression. These techniques are exemplified in Ausubel et al. (eds.) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons (1998, and supplements through 2001). Changes in the activity of the transcription factor can be monitored, directly or indirectly, by assaying the function of the transcription factor, for example, by measuring the expression of promoters known to be controlled by the transcription factor (using promoter-reporter constructs), measuring the levels of transcripts using microarrays, Northern blots, quantitative PCR, etc. Such changes in the expression levels can be correlated with modified plant traits and thus identified molecules can be useful for soaking or spraying on fruit, vegetable and grain crops to modify traits in plants.
Essentially any available composition can be tested for modulatory activity of expression or activity of any nucleic acid or polypeptide herein. Thus, available libraries of compounds such as chemicals, polypeptides, nucleic acids and the like can be tested for modulatory activity. Often, potential modulator compounds can be dissolved in aqueous or organic (e.g., DMSO-based) solutions for easy delivery to the cell or plant of interest in which the activity of the modulator is to be tested. Optionally, the assays are designed to screen large modulator composition libraries by automating the assay steps and providing compounds from any convenient source to assays, which are typically run in parallel (e.g., in microtiter formats on micrometer plates in robotic assays).
In one embodiment, high throughput screening methods involve providing a combinatorial library containing a large number of potential compounds (potential modulator compounds). Such “combinatorial chemical libraries” are then screened in one or more assays, as described herein, to identify those library members (particular chemical species or subclasses) that display a desired characteristic activity. The compounds thus identified can serve as target compounds.
A combinatorial chemical library can be, e.g., a collection of diverse chemical compounds generated by chemical synthesis or biological synthesis. For example, a combinatorial chemical library such as a polypeptide library is formed by combining a set of chemical building blocks (e.g., in one example, amino acids) in every possible way for a given compound length (i.e., the number of amino acids in a polypeptide compound of a set length). Exemplary libraries include peptide libraries, nucleic acid libraries, antibody libraries (see, e.g., Vaughn et al. (1996) Nature Biotechnol. 14: 309-314 and PCT/US96/10287), carbohydrate libraries (see, e.g., Liang et al. Science (1996) 274: 1520-1522 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,593,853), peptide nucleic acid libraries (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,539,083), and small organic molecule libraries (see, e.g., benzodiazepines, in Baum Chem. & Engineering News Jan. 18, 1993, page 33; isoprenoids, U.S. Pat. No. 5,569,588; thiazolidinones and metathiazanones, U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,974; pyrrolidines, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,525,735 and 5,519,134; morpholino compounds, U.S. Pat. No. 5,506,337) and the like.
Preparation and screening of combinatorial or other libraries is well known to those of skill in the art. Such combinatorial chemical libraries include, but are not limited to, peptide libraries (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,010,175; Furka, (1991) Int. J. Pept. Prot. Res. 37: 487-493; and Houghton et al. (1991) Nature 354: 84-88). Other chemistries for generating chemical diversity libraries can also be used.
In addition, as noted, compound screening equipment for high-throughput screening is generally available, e.g., using any of a number of well known robotic systems that have also been developed for solution phase chemistries useful in assay systems. These systems include automated workstations including an automated synthesis apparatus and robotic systems utilizing robotic arms. Any of the above devices are suitable for use with the present invention, e.g., for high-throughput screening of potential modulators. The nature and implementation of modifications to these devices (if any) so that they can operate as discussed herein will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art.
Indeed, entire high-throughput screening systems are commercially available. These systems typically automate entire procedures including all sample and reagent pipetting, liquid dispensing, timed incubations, and final readings of the microplate in detector(s) appropriate for the assay. These configurable systems provide high throughput and rapid start up as well as a high degree of flexibility and customization. Similarly, microfluidic implementations of screening are also commercially available.
The manufacturers of such systems provide detailed protocols the various high throughput. Thus, for example, Zymark Corp. provides technical bulletins describing screening systems for detecting the modulation of gene transcription, ligand binding, and the like. The integrated systems herein, in addition to providing for sequence alignment and, optionally, synthesis of relevant nucleic acids, can include such screening apparatus to identify modulators that have an effect on one or more polynucleotides or polypeptides according to the present invention.
In some assays it is desirable to have positive controls to ensure that the components of the assays are working properly. At least two types of positive controls are appropriate. That is, known transcriptional activators or inhibitors can be incubated with cells or plants, for example, in one sample of the assay, and the resulting increase/decrease in transcription can be detected by measuring the resulting increase in RNA levels and/or protein expression, for example, according to the methods herein. It will be appreciated that modulators can also be combined with transcriptional activators or inhibitors to find modulators that inhibit transcriptional activation or transcriptional repression. Either expression of the nucleic acids and proteins herein or any additional nucleic acids or proteins activated by the nucleic acids or proteins herein, or both, can be monitored.
In an embodiment, the invention provides a method for identifying compositions that modulate the activity or expression of a polynucleotide or polypeptide of the invention. For example, a test compound, whether a small or large molecule, is placed in contact with a cell, plant (or plant tissue or explant), or composition comprising the polynucleotide or polypeptide of interest and a resulting effect on the cell, plant, (or tissue or explant) or composition is evaluated by monitoring, either directly or indirectly, one or more of: expression level of the polynucleotide or polypeptide, activity (or modulation of the activity) of the polynucleotide or polypeptide. In some cases, an alteration in a plant phenotype can be detected following contact of a plant (or plant cell, or tissue or explant) with the putative modulator, e.g., by modulation of expression or activity of a polynucleotide or polypeptide of the invention. Modulation of expression or activity of a polynucleotide or polypeptide of the invention may also be caused by molecular elements in a signal transduction second messenger pathway and such modulation can affect similar elements in the same or another signal transduction second messenger pathway.
Subsequences
Also contemplated are uses of polynucleotides, also referred to herein as oligonucleotides, typically having at least 12 bases, preferably at least 15, more preferably at least 20, 30, or 50 bases, which hybridize under at least highly stringent (or ultra-high stringent or ultra-ultra-high stringent conditions) conditions to a polynucleotide sequence described above. The polynucleotides may be used as probes, primers, sense and antisense agents, and the like, according to methods as noted supra.
Subsequences of the polynucleotides of the invention, including polynucleotide fragments and oligonucleotides are useful as nucleic acid probes and primers. An oligonucleotide suitable for use as a probe or primer is at least about 15 nucleotides in length, more often at least about 18 nucleotides, often at least about 21 nucleotides, frequently at least about 30 nucleotides, or about 40 nucleotides, or more in length. A nucleic acid probe is useful in hybridization protocols, e.g., to identify additional polypeptide homologs of the invention, including protocols for microarray experiments. Primers can be annealed to a complementary target DNA strand by nucleic acid hybridization to form a hybrid between the primer and the target DNA strand, and then extended along the target DNA strand by a DNA polymerase enzyme. Primer pairs can be used for amplification of a nucleic acid sequence, e.g., by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or other nucleic-acid amplification methods. See Sambrook, supra, and Ausubel, supra.
In addition, the invention includes an isolated or recombinant polypeptide including a subsequence of at least about 15 contiguous amino acids encoded by the recombinant or isolated polynucleotides of the invention. For example, such polypeptides, or domains or fragments thereof, can be used as immunogens, e.g., to produce antibodies specific for the polypeptide sequence, or as probes for detecting a sequence of interest. A subsequence can range in size from about 15 amino acids in length up to and including the full length of the polypeptide.
To be encompassed by the present invention, an expressed polypeptide which comprises such a polypeptide subsequence performs at least one biological function of the intact polypeptide in substantially the same manner, or to a similar extent, as does the intact polypeptide. For example, a polypeptide fragment can comprise a recognizable structural motif or functional domain such as a DNA binding domain that activates transcription, e.g., by binding to a specific DNA promoter region an activation domain, or a domain for protein-protein interactions.
Production of Transgenic Plants
Modification of Traits
The polynucleotides of the invention are favorably employed to produce transgenic plants with various traits, or characteristics, that have been modified in a desirable manner, e.g., to improve the seed characteristics of a plant. For example, alteration of expression levels or patterns (e.g., spatial or temporal expression patterns) of one or more of the transcription factors (or transcription factor homologs) of the invention, as compared with the levels of the same protein found in a wild-type plant, can be used to modify a plant's traits. An illustrative example of trait modification, improved characteristics, by altering expression levels of a particular transcription factor is described further in the Examples and the Sequence Listing.
Arabidopsis as a model system
Arabidopsis thaliana is the object of rapidly growing attention as a model for genetics and metabolism in plants. Arabidopsis has a small genome, and well-documented studies are available. It is easy to grow in large numbers and mutants defining important genetically controlled mechanisms are either available, or can readily be obtained. Various methods to introduce and express isolated homologous genes are available (see Koncz et al., eds., Methods in Arabidopsis Research (1992) World Scientific, New Jersey, N.J., in “Preface”). Because of its small size, short life cycle, obligate autogamy and high fertility, Arabidopsis is also a choice organism for the isolation of mutants and studies in morphogenetic and development pathways, and control of these pathways by transcription factors (Koncz supra, p. 72). A number of studies introducing transcription factors into A. thaliana have demonstrated the utility of this plant for understanding the mechanisms of gene regulation and trait alteration in plants. (See, for example, Koncz supra, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,417,428).
Homologous Genes Introduced Into Transgenic Plants.
Homologous genes that may be derived from any plant, or from any source whether natural, synthetic, semi-synthetic or recombinant, and that share significant sequence identity or similarity to those provided by the present invention, may be introduced into plants, for example, crop plants, to confer desirable or improved traits. Consequently, transgenic plants may be produced that comprise a recombinant expression vector or cassette with a promoter operably linked to one or more sequences homologous to presently disclosed sequences. The promoter may be, for example, a plant or viral promoter.
The invention thus provides for methods for preparing transgenic plants, and for modifying plant traits. These methods include introducing into a plant a recombinant expression vector or cassette comprising a functional promoter operably linked to one or more sequences homologous to presently disclosed sequences. Plants and kits for producing these plants that result from the application of these methods are also encompassed by the present invention.
Transcription Factors of Interest for the Modification of Plant Traits
Currently, the existence of a series of maturity groups for different latitudes represents a major barrier to the introduction of new valuable traits. Any trait (e.g. disease resistance) has to be bred into each of the different maturity groups separately, a laborious and costly exercise. The availability of single strain, which could be grown at any latitude, would therefore greatly increase the potential for introducing new traits to crop species such as soybean and cotton.
For many of the specific effects, traits and utilities listed in Table 4 and Table 6 that may be conferred to plants, one or more transcription factor genes may be used to increase or decrease, advance or delay, or improve or prove deleterious to a given trait. For example, overexpression of a transcription factor gene that naturally occurs in a plant may cause early flowering relative to non-transformed or wild-type plants. By knocking out the gene, or suppressing the gene (with, for example, antisense suppression) the plant may experience delayed flowering. Similarly, overexpressing or suppressing one or more genes can impart significant differences in production of plant products, such as different fatty acid ratios. Thus, suppressing a gene that causes a plant to be more sensitive to cold may improve a plant's tolerance of cold. More than one transcription factor gene may be introduced into a plant, either by transforming the plant with one or more vectors comprising two or more transcription factors, or by selective breeding of plants to yield hybrid crosses that comprise more than one introduced transcription factor.
A listing of specific effects and utilities that the presently disclosed transcription factor genes have on plants, as determined by direct observation and assay analysis, is provided in Table 4. Table 4 shows the polynucleotides identified by SEQ ID NO; Gene ID No. (GID); and if the polynucleotide was tested in a transgenic assay. The first column shows the polynucleotide SEQ ID NO; the second column shows the GID; the third column shows whether the gene was overexpressed (OE) or knocked out (KO) in plant studies; the fourth column shows the category of modified trait resulting from the knock out or overexpression of the polynucleotide in the transgenic plant; and the fifth column (“Experimental Observations”), includes specific observations made with respect to the polynucleotide of the respective first column.







TABLE 4







Traits, trait categories, and effects and utilities that transcription factor genes have on plants.











SEQ ID






NO:
GID
OE/KO
Category
Experimental Observations





 1
G2
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


 3
G12
OE/KO
Morphology; altered
Leaf and hypocotyl cell death; knockout seedlings





programmed cell death
germinated in the dark on 1-aminocyclopropane-1-





Growth regulator; altered
carboxylic acid-containing media were more stunted





ethylene sensitivity
than controls





Dev and morph;
Formation of necrotic lesions





Morphology: other


 5
G15
OE
Dev and morph; flower
Altered flower morphology




OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


 7
G30
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Long cotyledons, petioles and hypocotyls, dark





Leaf; dark green leaves
green, glossy leaves; shade avoidance





Leaf; glossy leaves





Light response; Long





petioles





Light response; Long





hypocotyls





Light response; Long





cotyledons


 9
G46
OE
Dev and morph; Size
Increased biomass




OE
Abiotic stress; Drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay


 11
G47
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Abiotic stress; osmotic stress
Better root growth under osmotic stress




OE
Dev and morph; Architecture
Altered architecture and inflorescence development




OE
Dev and morph; stem
Altered structure of vascular tissues




OE
Abiotic stress; drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay


 13
G129
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering





Leaf: altered shape
Leaf shape





Flower: homeotic
Homeotic transformation





transformation


15 and
G131
OE
Dev and morph; size
Small plants


2102


Flowering time
Early flowering




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Curled leaves




OE
Dev and morph; Flower
Loss of flower determinacy, terminal flowers




OE
Dev and morph;
Altered inflorescence determinacy





Inflorescence


 17
G133
OE
Flower: homeotic
Homeotic transformation





transformation


 19
G134
OE
Flower: homeotic
Homeotic transformation





transformation
Increased sensitivity to cold





Abiotic stress; cold





sensitivity


 21
G135
OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Curled leaves




OE
Dev and morph;
Altered inflorescence determinacy; terminal flowers





Inflorescence




OE
Dev and morph; Flower
Loss of flower determinacy,




OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


 23
G136
OE
Morphology; altered flower
Altered flower development (tiny petals)





development





Flowering time
Early flowering





Leaf; altered shape
Small, upward curling leaves





Morphology: size
Small plant


 25
G137
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering





Inflorescence; Terminal
Terminal flower formation





flowers
Leaf curling





Leaf; altered shape


 27
G138
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


 29
G139
OE
Expression; drought
This gene was induced in rosette leaves in response






to drought treatments


 31
G140
OE
Flower: homeotic
Homeotic transformation





transformation
Early flowering





Flowering time


 33
G142
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


 35
G145
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering





Inflorescence; terminal
Terminal flower





flowers


 37
G146
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


 39
G148
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering





Inflorescence; terminal
Terminal flower





flowers


 41
G151
OE
Seed; Large seed
Larger seed size than controls


 43
G153
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering




OE
Abiotic stress; Nutrient
Altered C/N sensing





uptake


 45
G155
OE
Altered sugar sensing
Increased sensitivity to glucose





Flowering time
Early flowering





Abiotic stress; osmotic stress
Increased sensitivity to mannitol





Inflorescence; terminal
Terminal flower





flower


 47
G171
OE
Expression; heat
Expression was induced in leaves by heat




OE
Expression; chilling
Expression was induced in leaves by cold




OE
Expression; Fusarium
Expression was induced in leaves by Fusarium


 49
G172
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


 51
G173
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


 53
G200
OE
Nutrient; tolerance to low N
Seedlings contained less anthocyanin and were





C/N sensing
greener on high sucrose medium lacking nitrogen,





Leaf; altered shape
and on similar media supplemented with glutamine;





Leaf; light green leaves
mature plants had small, light green pointed leaves;





Flowering time
early flowering


 55
G224
OE
Leaf: altered shape
Altered leaf shape





Abiotic stress; cold tolerance
Increased tolerance to cold





Altered sugar sensing
Seedling vigor on high glucose


 57
G244
OE
Expression; auxin
Expression was induced by auxin




OE
Expression; drought
Expression was induced by drought




OE
Expression; ABA
Expression was induced by abscisic acid


 59
G246
OE
Light response; shade
Shade avoidance





avoidance
Early flowering





Flowering time


 61
G253
OE
Size; small plants
Reduced plant size




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Heart shaped and dark green leaves




OE
Dev and morph;
Short inflorescence internodes





Inflorescence


 63
G268
OE
Plant size; large plants
Increased biomass


 65
G287
OE
Dev and morph; Size
Increased biomass


 67
G309
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Plant size; small plants
Reduced plant size




OE
Leaf; altered coloration
Dark green leaves


 69
G314
OE
Dev and morph; Size
Increased biomass


 71
G319
OE
Plant size; Increased size
Increased size; late flowering; wrinkled, short broad





Flowering time
leaves





Leaf; altered shape


73 and
G324
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


2103




OE
Size; large plants
Increased biomass


 75
G344
OE
Abiotic stress; chilling
More sensitive to chilling in germination assay




OE
Growth regulator; altered
Altered sugar sensing phenotype: more sensitive to





sugar sensing
glucose in a germination assay


 77
G351
OE
Altered light response
Leaf orientation and light green coloration


1379 
G353
OE
Abiotic stress; osmotic stress
Seedlings were larger and greener on PEG-






containing media


1381 
G354
OE
Abiotic stress; drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay


 79
G355
OE
Nutrient; Tolerance to low
Enhanced growth under limiting phosphate in root





PO4
growth assay, and better growth in high NaCl





Abiotic stress; sodium





chloride tolerance


 81
G366
OE
Dev and morph; Lethal when
Lethal when overexpressed





overexpressed


 83
G370
KO
Abiotic stress; osmotic stress
Short, round leaves; flowers showed a striking





Leaf; altered shape
increase in trichome density on sepals, and carried




OE
Morphology; increased
ectopic trichomes on petals, anthers, and carpels;





trichome density
aerial rosettes occur when a secondary inflorescence





Morphology; altered timing
meristem develops; knockout was more sensitive to





of phase change
osmotic stress in a germination assay and produced






bushy rosettes, small, shiny plants


 85
G372
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape





Flowering time
Late flowering


 87
G374
KO
Dev and morph; Embryo
Lethality at early stages of embryo development





lethal


 89
G380
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


91 and
G386
OE
Biochem: misc;
Increased pigment production


2104


Biochemistry: other




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size


 93
G416
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


 95
G434
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


 97
G438
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Larger, flatter leaves than those of controls at late





Leaf
stages of development





Plant size; increased size


 99
G446
OE
Altered architecture
Altered branching





Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape


101
G468
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Wrinkled leaves


103
G478
OE
Altered light response
Long petioles





Altered sugar sensing
More sensitive to glucose


105
G485
KO
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


107
G521
OE
Leaf; cell expansion
Cell expansion


109
G549
OE
Dev and morph;
Altered inflorescence determinacy





Inflorescence




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size




OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


111
G550
OE
Morphology; altered flowers
Early flowers were small with poor organ formation,





Abiotic stress; heat tolerance
late flowers were normal; less tolerant to heat stress





Expression; sodium chloride
in a growth assay; high anthocyanin level; G550





Expression; auxin
expression is induced in response to heat, auxin and





Pigment; high anthocyanin
salt stress


113
G571
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
This gene is also strongly induced in rosette leaves





ABA response
by ABA, drought, osmotic stress and Erysiphe





Abiotic stress; drought





Abiotic stress; osmotic stress





Expression; Erysiphe


115
G581
OE
Nutrient; tolerance to low N
Overexpressing lines germinated better on plates





Seed; altered coloration
containing low N or plates with low N supplemented





Seed; Large seed
with glutamine, seedlings also had less anthocyanin





Flowering time
accumulation when compared to wild-type controls;





Pigment; Increased
increased seed size, altered seed color; late flowering





anthocyanin


117
G600
OE
Leaf; light green leaves
Small, flat, short and grayish or light green rosette





Flowering time
leaves; early flowering; smaller plants





Plant size; small plants


119 and
G624
OE
Nutrient uptake; tolerance to
Better root growth on media lacking phosphate


2105


low PO4




OE
Abiotic stress; sodium
Increased tolerance to sodium chloride





chloride tolerance




OE
Increased size
Increased biomass




OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


121
G627
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


123
G646
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Very narrow downward curled dark green leaves


125 and
G651
OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Altered leaf shape and gray leaves


2106




OE
Abiotic stress; Cold
Increased sensitivity to cold in a germination assay




OE
Dev and morph; Root
Altered root branching




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size




OE
Dev and morph Flower
Altered flower morphology


127
G652
OE/KO
Leaf biochemistry;;
Knockout had increase in the leaf glucosinolate





increased glucosinolates
M39480 and seed a-tocopherol, decrease in seed oil;





Seed biochemistry; increased
overexpressor showed delayed senescence





seed prenyl lipids





Seed biochemistry;





decreased seed oil





Delayed senescence


129
G707
OE
Abiotic stress; Nutrient
Altered C/N sensing





uptake




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Dark green leaves




OE
Biochem: misc;
Increased pigment production





Biochemistry: other




OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


131
G728
OE
Abiotic stress; cold tolerance
Increased tolerance to cold


133
G730
OE
Dev and morph; Root
Reduced secondary root growth




OE
Dev and morph;
Abaxialization of adaxial surfaces





Morphology: other


135
G738
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering; small seedlings; high anthocyanin





Plant size; small plants
levels in leaf petioles; smaller plants





Pigment; High anthocyanin


137 and
G744
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


2107


131
G752
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


141
G807
OE
Abiotic stress; chilling
Seedling vigor was improved in T1 transformants




OE
tolerance
and T2 progeny, seedlings were reproducibly larger,




OE
Expression; heat
grew faster and showed longer hypocotyl and




OE
Expression: auxin
petioles than controls; expression of this gene




OE
Fast growth
moderately upon heat shock and auxin treatment




OE
Light response; long petioles





Light response; long





hypocotyls


143
G811
OE
Leaf; dark green leaves
Dark green leaves





Size; small plants
Reduced size


145
G839
OE
Nutrient; tolerance to low N
Increased tolerance to nitrogen-limited medium





Flowering time
Late flowering


147
G846
OE
Dev and morph Flower
Gamete lethal


149
G852
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering





Size; large plants
Large plant


151
G905
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering





Altered sugar sensing
Seedling vigor on high glucose





Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape


153
G916
OE
Growth regulator; altered
Larger seedlings than wild type in high sucrose,





sugar sensing
seedlings were larger and had less anthocyanin on





Nutrient; tolerance to low N
high sucrose plates that were nitrogen deficient, with





Light response; Long
or without glutamine supplementation;





hypocotyls
disproportionately long hypocotyls and narrow





Morphology; Narrow
cotyledons





cotyledons





Abiotic stress: drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay





tolerance


155
G926
KO
Hormone sensitivity
Reduced sensitivity to ABA




KO
Abiotic stress; Osmotic
Increased tolerance to osmotic stress (salt and





stress
sucrose)




KO
Abiotic stress; Drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay


157
G957
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Wrinkled, curled leaves


159
G961
OE
Dev and morph; Seed
Altered seed development and germination




KO
Seed biochemistry; Seed oil
Increased seed oil


161
G975
OE
Leaf biochemistry; Leaf fatty
Increased wax in leaves





acids





Abiotic stress; Drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay


163
G1011
OE
Morphology; altered flowers
Floral organ abscission was delayed, with stamens,





Leaf; altered shape
petals, and sepals persisting following pollination;





Flowering time
increased trichome density on sepals and ectopic





Morphology; increased
trichomes on carpels; rounded leaves; early





trichome density
flowering


165
G1013
OE
Slow growth
Slow growth rate





Flower alterations
Multiple flower alterations





Altered light response
Light response: leaf orientation





Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape





Altered C/N sensing
C/N sensing: better germination


167
G1017
OE
Abiotic stress; Sodium
Increased tolerance to sodium chloride





chloride tolerance


169
G1033
OE
Premature senescence
Premature leaf senescence





Altered sugar sensing
Increased seedling vigor on sucrose





Abiotic stress; osmotic stress
Increased tolerance to sucrose





tolerance


171 and
G1037
OE
Abiotic stress; Sodium
Increased tolerance to sodium chloride


2108


chloride tolerance


173
G1082
OE
Light response; long
Longer hypocotyls than controls





hypocotyls


175
G1100
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Dark green, pointed leaves, large dark green rosettes;





Leaf; dark green leaves
stunted inflorescence growth and abnormal flowers;





Morphology; altered flowers
slower growth rate; this gene is strongly and





Abiotic stress
specifically induced by drought and salicylic acid





Expression; SA





Expression; drought


177
G1108
OE
Altered sugar sensing
Less sensitive to glucose


179
G1113
OE
Increased plant size
Increased biomass




OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


181
G1128
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Dark green, narrow contorted leaves; premature leaf





Leaf; dark green leaves
and flower senescence; little or no seed development





Morphology; Changes to





flower





Growth rate; altered rate of





senescence





Seed; altered development


183
G1136
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering





Nutrient; sensitivity to low N
Increased sensitivity to nitrogen


185
G1142
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering





Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape


187 and
G1150
OE
Abiotic stress; Nutrient
Altered C/N sensing


2109


uptake




OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Increased biomass


189
G1206
OE
Abiotic stress; drought
Increased seedling vigor under drought conditions,





tolerance
seedlings larger and greener than controls


191
G1247
OE
Size; small plant
Altered leaf shape





Leaf; altered shape
Reduced plant size


193
G1274
OE
Abiotic stress; Cold
More tolerant to cold in a germination assay




OE
Abiotic stress; Chilling
More tolerant to chilling in a seedling growth assay




OE
Abiotic stress; Drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay




OE
Dev and morph;
Altered inflorescence architecture





Inflorescence




OE
Abiotic stress; Nutrient
Increased tolerance to low nitrogen





uptake




OE
Abiotic stress; Nutrient
Altered C/N sensing





uptake




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Large leaves


195
G1276
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


197
G1289
OE
Plant size; small
All overexpressing lines showed reduced size


199
G1313
OE
Size; large plant
Increased seedling size


201
G1327
OE
Leaf; dark green leaves
Dark green leaves


203
G1340
OE
Plant size; small
All overexpressing lines showed reduced size


205
G1341
OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Dark green leaves, leaf curling


207
G1357
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Hormone sensitivity
Insensitive to ABA




OE
Abiotic stress; Chilling
More tolerant to chilling stress in a growth assay




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Altered leaf shape and dark green leaves




OE
Abiotic stress; Drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay


209
G1361
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering





Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape


211
G1384
OE
Dev and morph; lethal when
Lethal when overexpressed





overexpressed


213
G1389
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Inner rosette leaves were dark green, narrow, and





Leaf; dark green leaves
curled in T1 plants


215
G1412
OE
Abiotic stress; Osmotic
Increased tolerance to osmotic stress





stress




OE
Hormone sensitivity
ABA insensitive


217
G1420
OE
Morphology; long
Long flower organs (sepal and petal), mildly





cotyledons
serrated, narrow, darker green leaves (including





Leaf; altered shape
pedicel); poor growth on glucose; long narrow





Leaf; dark green leaves
cotyledons





Growth regulator; altered





sugar sensing





Morphology; altered flower


219
G1423
OE
Leaf; dark green leaves
Dark green leaf coloration compared to wild-type,





Plant size; small plants
indicating a change in the levels of chlorophyll,






carotenoids, or flavonoids; transformants were






distinctly small


221
G1446
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


223
G1451
OE
Leaf; large leaves
Large leaf size





Flowering time
Late flowering





Size; large plant
Increased plant size


225
G1452
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Altered leaf shape, dark green leaves




OE
Abiotic stress; Osmotic
Better germination on sucrose and salt





stress





Abiotic stress; drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay




OE
Hormone sensitivity
Reduced sensitivity to ABA




OE
Dev and morph; Trichome
Reduced trichome density


227
G1468
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Dev and morph; size
Increased biomass




OE
Dev and morph; leaf
Grayish and narrow leaves




OE
Dev and morph;
Slow growth rate





Morphology: other


229
G1474
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering





Inflorescence; altered
Altered inflorescence architecture





architecture
Reduced plant size





Size; small plants


231
G1476
OE
Fast growth
Faster seedling growth rate; rounded, contorted





Leaf; altered shape
leaves


233
G1482
OE
Increased pigment
Increased anthocyanins in leaf


235
G1483
OE
Abiotic stress; Nutrient
Altered C/N sensing





uptake


237
G1493
OE
Altered sugar sensing
Seedling vigor on high glucose





Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape





Flowering time
Late flowering


239
G1507
OE
Expression: altered ABA
This gene is induced by ABA, heat, Fusarium, and





response
salicylic acid





Expression; heat





Expression; Fusarium





Expression: altered response





to SA


241
G1510
OE
Leaf; dark green leaves
Dark green leaves





Altered light response
Long hypocotyls


243
G1535
OE
Slow growth
Slow growth rate





Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape and coloration





Altered sugar sensing
Dark green seedling on high glucose





Altered C/N sensing
C/N sensing: more anthocyanin on nitrogen-limited






media


245
G1538
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering; improved tolerance to salt stress in





Abiotic stress; sodium
a root growth assay; larger seedlings with more





chloride tolerance
secondary root growth than wild-type; longer leaf





Leaf; altered shape
petioles; expression induced in leaves by heat and





Expression; heat
salicylic acid treatments





Expression; SA


247
G1539
OE
Altered trichome structure
Altered trichome structure





Altered cell differentiation
Altered cell differentiation





Flower; altered carpel
Ectopic carpel development





development


249
G1549
OE
Size; small plant
Reduced plant size





Slow growth
Slow growth rate





Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape and coloration


251
G1554
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Dark green leaves


253
G1556
OE
Dev and morph; Lethal when
Lethal when overexpressed





overexpressed


255
G1557
OE
Abiotic stress; sodium
Increased tolerance to sodium chloride





chloride tolerance


257
G1585
OE
Dev and morph
Altered cell differentiation





Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape


259
G1591
OE
Flower; altered carpel
Ectopic carpel development





development
Altered cell differentiation





Morphology; altered cell





differentiation


261
G1593
OE
Inflorescence; altered
Altered inflorescence architecture





architecture
Altered leaf shape and coloration





Leaf; altered shape and





coloration


263
G1660
OE
Abiotic stress; sodium
More root growth and seedling vigor in high salt





chloride tolerance


265
G1718
OE
Leaf; altered coloration
Pale gray leaves


267
G1730
OE
Abiotic stress; osmotic stress
Large and green seedlings on mannitol and glucose





tolerance


269
G1743
OE
Inflorescence; altered
Altered inflorescence architecture





architecture
Altered leaf shape, dark green leaves





Leaf; altered shape and





coloration


271
G1753
OE
Altered sugar sensing
Altered inflorescence architecture





Abiotic stress; osmotic stress
Better germination on high sucrose media





tolerance





Inflorescence; altered





architecture


273
G1772
OE
Size; small plant
Reduced plant size


275
G1779
OE
Abiotic stress; chilling
Mature plants have enhanced tolerance to chilling






stress for a long time period


277
G1792
OE
Disease; Erysiphe
Increased resistance to Erysiphe




OE
Disease; Fusarium
Increased resistance to Fusarium




OE
Disease; Botrytis
Increased resistance to Botrytis




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Dark green, shiny leaves




OE
Nutrient uptake; tolerance to
Increased tolerance to low nitrogen





low N




OE
Abiotic stress; Drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay


279
G1796
OE
Inflorescence; Short
Flower carpel alterations (thickened club-like





internodes
carpels); short internodes; dark curled leaves





Leaf; altered shape





Leaf; dark green leaves


281
G1797
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering




OE
Dev and morph Flower
Flower organs persisted following fertilization


283
G1798
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering




OE
Dev and morph;
Multiple inflorescence defects





Inflorescence


285
G1808
OE
Abiotic stress; chilling
Mature overexpressing plants were less tolerant to






cold


287
G1816
OE
Trichome; glabrous leaves
Glabrous leaves





Abiotic stress; osmotic stress
Increased tolerance to high glucose





tolerance
Increased root hairs





Root; increased hairs
Increased tolerance to high glucose





Altered sugar sensing
C/N sensing: improved tolerance to low nitrogen





Altered C/N sensing


289
G1823
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


291
G1825
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering





Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape


293
G1832
OE
Dev and morph; Lethal when
Lethal when overexpressed





overexpressed


295
G1837
OE
Abiotic stress; sodium
More root growth and seedling vigor in high salt





chloride tolerance




OE
Abiotic stress; chilling
Enhanced tolerance, better growth of seedlings





tolerance
under chilling conditions


297
G1840
OE
Dev and morph;
Formation of necrotic lesions





Morphology: other


299
G1846
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Dark green leaves, poorly developed inflorescences





Leaf; dark green leaves


301
G1850
OE
Dev and morph; Lethal when
Lethal when overexpressed





overexpressed


303
G1863
KO
Abiotic stress; sodium
Decreased germination under salt stress





chloride




OE
Leaf; altered shape and
Altered leaf shape and coloration





coloration
Late flowering





Flowering time


305
G1893
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
Insensitivity to ABA; rectangular cotyledons;





ABA response; altered
seedlings contain more anthocyanin; leaves were





cotyledons
small with serrated margins





Morphology





Leaf; altered shape


307
G1917
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Leaves are elongated and curled; with frilly, serrated






margins


309
G1923
OE
Abiotic stress; heat
This gene is up-regulated by Fusarium and Erysiphe




OE
Abiotic stress; osmotic stress
infection, as well as auxin, heat and osmotic stress




OE
Expression; Fusarium
treatments




OE
Expression; Erysiphe




OE
Hormone sensitivity; auxin


311
G1928
OE
Abiotic stress; cold tolerance
Increased tolerance to cold


313
G1932
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Leaves were dark green with jagged leaf margins





Leaf; dark green leaves


315
G1938
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Curled, contorted leaves, dark green leaves; slow





Leaf; dark green leaves
growth rate; more sensitive to osmotic stress





Abiotic stress; osmotic stress





Plant size; small plants


317
G1945
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape





Flowering time
Late flowering


319
G1957
OE
Dev and morph; Lethal when
Lethal due to meristem defects





overexpressed


321
G1968
OE
Nutrient; tolerance to low N
Overexpression resulted in more tolerance to chilling






stress in a growth assay compared to control plants;






overexpressing lines contained more anthocyanins






when grown under low nitrogen, or low nitrogen






plus glutamate, in a germination assay


323
G1983
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Dark green leaves; late flowering; small plants





Leaf; dark green leaves





Flowering time





Size; small plants


325
G1985
OE
Dev and morph; phase
Phase change and floral reversion





change and floral reversion
Aerial rosettes





Dev and morph; aerial





rosettes


327
G1988
OE
Nutrient; Tolerance to low N
Better growth on low nitrogen plus glutamine, better





Nutrient; Tolerance to low
growth on low phosphate; long hypocotyl, long





PO4
petiole, early flowering





Flowering time





Light response; Long petiole





Light response; Long





hypocotyl


329
G1990
OE
Dev and morph;
Lethal when overexpressed





Morphology: other


331
G1993
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Short petioles and round leaf shape





Size; small plant size
Reduced plant size


333
G1995
OE
Morphology; increased
Increased trichome number on sepals, ectopic





trichome number
trichomes on carpels yield enhanced production of





Nutrient; Tolerance to low N
leaf, flower, and outer ovule epidermis products;





Nutrient; Tolerance to low
slightly less tolerant to low nitrogen and low





PO4
phosphorus; aerial rosettes occurred when a





Inflorescence; altered aerial
secondary inflorescence meristem developed in a





rosettes
manner comparable to a primary shoot meristem





Morphology; altered timing
during the vegetative phase of growth, with aerial





of phase change
rosette-like structures and floral organs being bract-






like


335
G1998
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


337
G1999
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


339
G2035
OE
Abiotic stress; sodium
Increased seedling vigor in high sodium chloride





chloride tolerance


341 and
G2041
OE
Abiotic stress; Sodium
Increased tolerance to sodium chloride


2110


chloride tolerance


343
G2051
OE
Abiotic stress; Cold
Increased tolerance to cold in a germination assay


345
G2060
OE
Abiotic stress; sodium
More root growth and seedling vigor in high salt





chloride tolerance


347
G2063
OE
Abiotic stress; cold tolerance
Increased seedling vigor in cold


349
G2070
OE
Abiotic stress; chilling
Mature overexpressing plants were less tolerant to




OE
Abiotic stress; heat
cold; gene was induced by ABA, cold and heat




OE
Expression; altered ABA





response


351
G2071
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


353
G2084
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Short petioles, and rounded, slightly dark green






leaves


355
G2085
OE
Leaf; altered shape and
Altered leaf shape, dark green leaves





coloration





Seed; increased size, altered
Increased seed size, altered seed color





color





Trichome; increased density
Increased trichome density


357 and
G2106
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


2111


359
G2109
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
Much less sensitive to ABA in a germination assay





ABA response
than wild-type


361
G2111
OE
Sugar sensing; Sugar sensing
Altered sugar sensing response; decreased growth






and small, pale seedlings on glucose medium


363
G2129
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


1495 
G2133
OE
Abiotic stress; drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay


365
G2142
OE
Abiotic stress; tolerance to
More tolerant to phosphate deprivation in a root





low PO4
growth assay




OE
Flowering time
Accelerated flowering time


367
G2146
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
Insensitive to ABA in a germination assay; late





ABA response
flowering; more branching, short internodes,





Flowering time
inflorescences were shorter and bushier than wild





Inflorescence; Short
type; dark green appearance





internodes





Leaf; dark green leaves


369
G2184
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


371
G2207
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
Increased tolerance to osmotic stress under high salt





ABA response Abiotic
or sucrose and less sensitive to ABA in germination





stress; sodium chloride
assays; late flowering; narrow dark green leaves





tolerance





Abiotic stress; osmotic





tolerance





Flowering time





Leaf; altered shape





Leaf; dark green leaves


373
G2213
OE
Dev and morph;
Lethal when overexpressed





Morphology: other


375
G2226
OE
Inflorescence; altered
Altered inflorescence architecture





architecture
Reduced plant size





Size; small plants
Altered leaf shape, dark green leaves





Leaf; altered shape and





coloration


377
G2227
OE
Size; small plant size
Reduced plant size





Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape


379
G2239
OE
Altered C/N sensing
C/N sensing: Better germination on low nitrogen






with sucrose or sucrose plus glutamine


381
G2251
OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Round and dark green leaves




OE
Dev and morph;
Short inflorescence internodes





Inflorescence




OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


383
G2269
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


385
G2298
OE
Dev and morph; Lethal when
Lethal when overexpressed





overexpressed


387
G2311
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


389
G2317
OE
Abiotic stress; cold tolerance
Increased tolerance to cold





Abiotic stress; sodium
Increased seedling vigor on high sodium chloride





chloride


391 and
G2319
OE
Abiotic stress; Sodium
Increased tolerance to sodium chloride


2112


chloride tolerance




OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


393
G2334
OE
Dev and morph; Size
Increased biomass




OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Dark green leaves and altered leaf shape


395
G2371
OE
Leaf; altered coloration
Dark green leaves





Seed; altered coloration
Altered seed coloration


397
G2372
OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Dark green leaves




OE
Flowering time
Early flowering




OE
Dev and morph;
Altered inflorescence determinacy and reduced





Inflorescence
fertility


399
G2375
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Small, narrow leaves; plants were distinctly smaller





Plant size; small plants
than wild type


401
G2382
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
Insensitive to ABA in germination assays





ABA response


403
G2394
OE
Abiotic stress; sodium
Enhanced germination on high sodium chloride





chloride tolerance


405
G2404
OE
Abiotic stress; sodium
Enhanced root growth on high sodium chloride





chloride tolerance


407
G2432
OE
Light response; altered shade
Shade avoidance; narrow, upward pointing leaves;





avoidance
delayed flowering, infertile flowers; narrow





Leaf; altered shape
cotyledons; poorly developed roots





Flowering time





Morphology; Narrow





cotyledons


409
G2443
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


411,
G2453
OE
Biochem: misc;
Increased pigment production


2113 and


Biochemistry: other


2114

OE
Abiotic stress; Sodium
Increased tolerance to sodium chloride





chloride tolerance




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Altered leaf shape and dark green leaves




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size


413
G2455
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Leaves are narrow and curled downward


415
G2456
OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Curled and dark green leaves




OE
Biochem: misc;
Increased pigment production





Biochemistry: other




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size


417
G2457
OE
Flower alterations
Multiple flower alterations





Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape





Abiotic stress; sodium
Increased root growth and less bleaching on high





chloride tolerance
sodium chloride


419
G2459
OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Curled leaves




OE
Biochem: misc;
Increased pigment production





Biochemistry: other


421
G2467
OE
Premature senescence
Early senescence


423
G2492
OE
Size; small plants
Reduced plant size


425
G2505
OE
Abiotic stress; drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay





tolerance


427
G2515
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering




OE
Dev and morph;
Altered inflorescence determinacy





Inflorescence




OE
Dev and morph Flower
Altered flower morphology




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced size


429
G2525
OE
Abiotic stress; cold
Increased sensitivity to cold





sensitivity


431
G2536
OE
Leaf; large leaf size
Large leaf size





Size; large plant size
Increased plant size





Delayed senescence
Delayed senescence


433
G2543
OE
Abiotic stress; cold
Increased sensitivity to cold





sensitivity


435
G2550
OE
Leaf; altered shape and
Altered leaf shape, dark green leaves





coloration
Altered inflorescence architecture





Inflorescence; altered





architecture


437 and
G2559
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


2115


439
G2565
OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Grayish leaf coloration and altered leaf shape


441
G2567
OE
Abiotic stress; chilling
Enhanced tolerance, better growth under chilling





tolerance
conditions


443
G2570
OE
Dev and morph;
Lethal when overexpressed





Morphology: other


445
G2571
OE
Inflorescence; Branching
Changes in coloration, branching patterns, and leaf





changes
and flower development, branching, sympodial in





Leaf, altered shape
the inflorescence, similar to that shown by tomato






plants


447
G2574
OE
Premature senescence
Premature leaf senescence





Size; small plants
Reduced plant size


449
G2575
OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Altered leaf shape




OE
Dev and morph;
Altered inflorescence architecture





Inflorescence


451
G2579
OE
Dev and morph; Silique
Altered silique size and shape




OE
Dev and morph Flower
Increased carpel size and infertile




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Altered leaf shape




OE
Abiotic stress; Chilling
Increased tolerance to chilling in a plate-based






growth assay


453
G2585
OE
Seed; Large seed
Larger seed size than controls


455
G2587
OE
Dev and morph; lethal when
Lethal when overexpressed





overexpressed


457
G2592
OE
Abiotic stress; cold
Increased sensitivity to cold





sensitivity


459
G2597
OE
Abiotic stress; chilling
This gene was induced in leaf tissue following cold






treatments at 4° C.


461
G2603
OE
Abiotic stress; cold
Increased sensitivity to cold





sensitivity


463
G2604
OE
Abiotic stress; Nutrient
Altered C/N sensing





uptake




OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Altered leaf surface, gray leaves


465
G2616
OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size




OE
Dev and morph;
Altered inflorescence architecture and flower





Inflorescence
development


467
G2617
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
More ABA insensitive than wild-type in a





ABA response
germination assay; faster growth rate for seedlings





Fast growth
and early stage plants; short petioles, short pedicels





Leaf; altered shape
and wrinkled, curled, rounded leaves


469
G2628
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering




OE
Leaf; altered shape
Rounded leaves;




OE
Plant size; small plants
Small plants


471
G2632
OE
Abiotic stress; Chilling
Increased sensitivity to chilling in a growth-based






assay


473
G2633
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


475
G2636
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Alterations in the pattern of rosette leaf initiation by





Morphology; altered
the shoot meristem; lobed leaves; adventitious





meristem development
shoots on the adaxial surface of lobed cotyledons





Morphology; lobed





cotyledons


477 and
G2639
OE
Dev and morph;
Short inflorescence internodes


2116


Inflorescence




OE
Flowering time
Early flowering




OE
Dev and morph Flower
Altered flower morphology and poorly fertile


479
G2640
OE
Dev and morph Flower
Altered flower morphology and poor fertility




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Dark green leaves with glossy surfaces




OE
Dev and morph;
Short inflorescence internodes





Inflorescence


481
G2649
OE
Dev and morph;
Short inflorescence internodes





Inflorescence




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Dark green, glossy leaf surface and elongated leaf






shape




OE
Dev and morph Flower
Altered flower morphology and poorly fertile




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size


483
G2650
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering; T2 plants developed excessive





Light response; Long
numbers of small axillary rosette leaves, long narrow





petioles
leaves; elongated petioles; long hypocotyls; leaves





Light response; Long
were held in a more upright orientation than controls





hypocotyls
(potential shade avoidance); larger seedlings and





Light response; Upright
mature plants than controls; larger seedlings than





leaves
controls under chilling conditions; increased number





Abiotic stress; chilling
of axillary meristems in the rosettes





tolerance





Size; Increased plant size





Morphology; More





meristems


485
G2655
OE
Dev and morph; Root
Poorly developed and greenish roots


487
G2661
OE
Growth regulator; altered
Better germination on glucose with greener





sugar sensing
cotyledons than wild-type; darker plants





Leaf; dark green leaves


489 and
G2679
OE
Dev and morph;
Enhanced seedling vigor


2117


Morphology: other


491
G2682
OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Curled leaves


493
G2686
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Rounded leaves with slightly lobed margins


495
G2690
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Narrow, dark green leaves that roll down at the





Leaf; dark green leaves
margins


497
G2691
OE
Abiotic stress; sodium
Higher germination in high salt





chloride tolerance


499
G2694
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering





Size; increased size
Increased seedling size





Leaf; altered shape and
Altered inflorescence architecture





coloration
Altered leaf shape, dark green leaves





Dev and morph; flower
Multiple flower alterations





alterations
Long petioles and leaf orientation





Inflorescence; altered





inflorescence architecture





Altered light response


501
G2699
OE
Leaf; altered shape and size
Long petioles and large leaves


503
G2702
OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Altered leaf shape


505
G2717
OE
Abiotic stress; Osmotic
Increased tolerance to osmotic stress (salt and





stress
sucrose)




OE
Abiotic stress; sodium





chloride tolerance




OE
Abiotic stress; drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay





tolerance




OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
Insensitive to ABA in germination assays





ABA response




OE
Size; increased plant size
Larger seedlings


507
G2718
OE
Dev and morph; Root
Increased root hair density




OE
Dev and morph; Trichome
Reduced trichome density




OE
Abiotic stress; Nutrient
Increased tolerance to low nitrogen





uptake




OE
Biochem: misc;
Reduced pigment production





Biochemistry: other


509
G2723
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


511
G2741
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Increased biomass


513
G2743
OE
Morphology; altered flower
Delayed flowering; altered flower development





development
(sepals, petals and stamens were reduced in size,





Flowering time
pollen production was poor)


515
G2747
OE
Root; reduced root formation
Long petioles and slightly narrow elongated leaf





Leaf; altered shape
blades, little or no secondary root formation


517
G2754
OE
Dev and morph
Shade avoidance





Flowering time
Early flowering


519
G2757
OE
Size; small plant size
Reduced plant size


521
G2763
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Abiotic stress; chilling
More sensitive to chilling temperatures during






growth




OE
Growth regulator; altered
More sensitive to glucose





sugar sensing




OE
Pigment; high anthocyanin
More anthocyanin accumulation in seedlings




OE
Leaf; dark green leaves
Dark green leaves


523
G2765
OE
Slow growth
Retarded growth at early stages


525 and
G2768
OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Increased leaf size


2118




OE
Dev and morph Flower
Increased petal number, loss of floral determinacy


527 and
G2771
OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Altered leaf shape and dark green leaves


2119




OE
Abiotic stress; Chilling
Reduced anthocyanins in a chilling growth assay




OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Dev and morph; Light
Elongated hypocotyl and pale in coloration





response


529
G2776
OE
Abiotic stress; osmotic
Seedlings grown on high sucrose were larger with





tolerance
green cotyledons compared with wild-type seedlings





Growth regulator; altered





sugar sensing


531
G2777
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


533
G2779
OE
Dev and morph
Pale leaf coloration





Flowering time
Early flowering


535
G2783
OE
Premature senescence
Early senescence





Size; small plant
Reduced plant size


537 and
G2784
OE
Dev and morph;
Altered inflorescence architecture


2120


Inflorescence




OE
Dev and morph;
Slow growth rate





Morphology: other




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Dark green and curled leaves




OE
Abiotic stress; Cold
Increase tolerance to cold in a germination assay


539
G2790
OE
Abiotic stress; chilling
Mature overexpressing plants were less tolerant to






cold


541 and
G2802
OE
Flowering time
Early and late flowering


2121


543
G2805
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


545
G2826
OE
Morphology; increased
Flowers had increased trichome density on sepals





trichome density
and possessed ectopic trichomes on the carpels;





Inflorescence; ectopic aerial
overexpressors developed aerial rosettes at





rosettes
coflorescence nodes, indicating a disruption in phase





Morphology; altered timing
change in the inflorescence





of phase change


547
G2830
OE
Altered C/N sensing
C/N sensing


549
G2832
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering





Leaf; altered coloration
Pale gray leaf color


551
G2834
OE
Slow growth rate
Slow growth rate


553
G2837
OE
Leaf; altered shape and
Altered leaf shape, dark green leaves





coloration


555
G2838
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering





Size; large plant
Increased seedling size





Leaf; altered coloration
Aerial rosettes





Trichome; increased density
Dark green leaves





Flower; multiple alterations
Increased trichome density






Multiple flower alterations


557
G2839
OE
Abiotic stress; osmotic stress
Better germination on high sucrose; increased





tolerance
resistance to osmotic stress; small, contorted leaves




OE
Leaf; altered shape
that are upcurled at margins, short petioles; poorly




OE
Growth regulator: altered
developed flowers with downward-pointing short





sugar sensing
pedicels




OE
Inflorescence; Architectural





change


559
G2846
OE
Leaf; altered shape and
Altered leaf shape, dark green leaves





coloration
Late flowering





Flowering time
Reduced plant size





Size; small plant


561
G2847
OE
Leaf; altered coloration
Dark green leaves





Size; small plant
Reduced plant size


563
G2850
OE
Leaf; altered shape and
Curled, dark green leaves





coloration


565
G2851
OE
Leaf; small leaves
Small, dark green, curled and wrinkled leaves; small





Leaf; altered shape
plants, slow growing





Leaf; dark green leaves





Slow growing


567
G2854
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
Better germination on high ABA and sucrose-





ABA response
containing media





Growth regulator; altered





sugar sensing


569
G2859
OE
Leaf; altered shape and
Altered leaf shape and light green leaves





coloration
Inflorescence architecture





Inflorescence; altered
Long hypocotyls, cotyledons; light green plants





architecture





Altered light response


571
G2865
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
Insensitive to ABA in germination assays





ABA response


573
G2866
OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Curled leaves


575
G2869
OE
Dev and morph;
Lethal when overexpressed





Morphology: other


577
G2884
OE
Dev and morph;
Abnormal embryo development





Morphology: other




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size




OE
Dev and morph Flower
Multiple flower defects and low fertility




OE
Dev and morph; Light
Long and green hypocotyls





response


579
G2885
OE
Dev and morph; cell
Altered cell differentiation





differentiation
Decreased tolerance to cold





Abiotic stress; cold tolerance


581
G2887
OE
Dev and morph; Lethal when
Lethal when overexpressed





overexpressed


583
G2888
OE
Leaf, altered shape
Altered leaf shape


585
G2898
OE
Sugar sensing
Better germination on high glucose media


587 and
G2907
OE
Dev and morph; Senescence
Accelerated senescence


2122


589
G2913
OE
Nutrient; tolerance to low N
Less anthocyanin on nitrogen-limited media


591
G2930
OE
Abiotic stress; chilling
Mature plants have enhanced tolerance to chilling





tolerance
stress


593
G2933
OE
Seed; Large seed
Big seeds; larger plants; more tolerant to chilling





Abiotic stress; chilling
stress in growth assays





tolerance


595
G2934
OE
Size; small plant
Reduced plant size


597
G2958
OE
Inflorescence; altered
Altered inflorescence architecture





architecture
Altered leaf shape, dark green leaves





Leaf; altered shape and
Reduced plant size





coloration





Size; small plants


599
G2964
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering





Dev and morph; aerial
Aerial rosettes





rosettes


601
G2967
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


603
G2969
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
Increased tolerance to sucrose and ABA in





ABA response
germination assays


605
G2972
OE
Nutrient; Tolerance to low
Overexpressing lines had more tolerance to low





PO4
phosphate conditions


607
G2979
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Increased biomass




OE
Dev and morph Flower
Increased flower organ size and number


609
G2981
OE
Nutrient; Tolerance to low N
Greener, larger seedlings on low nitrogen medium






supplemented with glutamine


611
G2982
OE
Abiotic stress; drought
Plants transformed with this gene displayed





tolerance
increased tolerance to dehydration stress in a soil-






based assay


613
G2983
OE
Flower; ectopic carpel
Ectopic carpel formation





formation
Altered cell proliferation





Dev and morph; altered cell
Altered growth pattern, proliferation and root hair





proliferation
density





Altered root
Altered cell differentiation, trichome cell fate





Dev and morph; altered cell





differentiation, trichome cell





fate


615
G2990
OE
Nutrient; tolerance to low N
Altered response to nitrogen deprivation, including






more root growth and more anthocyanin production






in some lines, more bleaching in others when grown






on low nitrogen, indicating this gene is involved in






the response to nutrient limitation


617
G2992
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
Enhanced ability to germinate on high NaCl and





ABA response
high ABA; less tolerant to low nitrogen; early





Flowering time
flowering; fewer lateral roots; altered leaf shape;





Abiotic stress; sodium
smaller plants





chloride tolerance





Nutrient; Tolerance to low N





Root; Fewer lateral roots





Leaf; altered shape





Plant size; small plants


619
G2993
OE
Dev and morph; Light
Elongated hypocotyl and altered leaf orientation





response




OE
Dev and morph; Root
Altered root branching




OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Abiotic stress; Osmotic
Increased sensitivity to osmotic stress





stress




OE
Abiotic stress; Chilling
Increased sensitivity to chilling in a growth assay


621
G2996
OE
Abiotic stress; osmotic stress
Increased sensitivity to mannitol in root growth






inhibition assays, (no secondary root growth)






indicating this gene influences osmotic stress






response


623
G2998
OE
Abiotic stress; sodium
Better germination in high NaCl; late flowering





chloride tolerance


625
G2999
OE
Abiotic stress; sodium
Increased tolerance to high sodium chloride





chloride tolerance




OE
Abiotic stress: drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay





tolerance




OE
Flowering time


627
G3002
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


629 and
G3003
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering


2123


631
G3008
OE
Leaf size
Large leaf size


633
G3017
OE
Size; small plant size
Reduced plant size


635
G3021
OE
Flowering time
Late flowering





Leaf; altered shape and
Altered inflorescence architecture





coloration
Altered leaf shape, dark green leaves





Inflorescence; altered





architecture


637
G3032
OE
Dev and morph; Light
Altered leaf orientation





response




OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


639
G3044
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering




OE
Leaf; altered shape
Narrow, serrated leaves




OE
Leaf; light green leaves
Pale leaves


641
G3054
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
Reduced sensitivity to ABA





ABA response


643
G3055
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
Insensitive to ABA in germination assays





ABA response


645
G3059
OE
Dev and morph; Senescence
Accelerated senescence




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Dark green leaves and altered leaf shape




OE
Dev and morph;
Altered inflorescence architecture





Inflorescence




OE
Dev and morph;
Altered cotyledon shape





Morphology: other




OE
Dev and morph; Size
Reduced plant size


647
G3060
OE
Flowering time
Some lines flowered early, and others flowered late


649
G3061
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering


651
G3067
OE
Hormone sensitivity; altered
Insensitive to ABA in germination assays





ABA response


653
G3070
OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Gray leaf coloration


655
G3076
OE
Abiotic stress; Drought
Increased tolerance to drought


657
G3083
OE
Abiotic stress; sodium
Higher germination in high salt





chloride tolerance


659
G3084
OE
Leaf; altered shape
Altered leaf shape


661
G3086
OE
Flowering time
Early flowering





Abiotic stress; heat tolerance
Increased tolerance to heat





Abiotic stress; sodium
Increased tolerance to high sodium chloride





chloride tolerance





Abiotic stress: drought
Increased tolerance to drought in a soil-based assay





tolerance


663
G3091
OE
Dev and morph;
Retarded growth rate





Morphology: other




OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Altered leaf shape and dark green leaves


665
G3094
OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Serrated leaves and long petioles




OE
Dev and morph Flower
Altered flower morphology


667
G3095
OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Altered leaf shape and dark green leaves




OE
Dev and morph;
Slow growth rate





Morphology: other


669
G3111
OE
Dev and morph; Leaf
Altered leaf shape and dark green leaves




OE
Flowering time
Late flowering




OE
Dev and morph; Senescence
Accelerated senescence









Table 5 shows the polypeptides identified by SEQ ID NO; Gene ID (GID) No; the transcription factors family to which the polypeptide belongs, and conserved domains of the polypeptide. The first column shows the polypeptide SEQ ID NO; the third column shows the transcription factor family to which the polynucleotide belongs; and the fourth column shows the amino acid residue positions of the conserved domain in amino acid (AA) coordinates.







TABLE 5







Gene families and conserved domains













Conserved





Domains


Polypeptide
GID

in Amino Acid


SEQ ID NO:
No.
Family
Coordinates













2
G2
129-195, 221-288
AP2


4
G12
27-94
AP2


6
G15
281-357, 383-451
AP2


8
G30
17-35
AP2


10
G46
107-175
AP2


12
G47
11-80
AP2


14
G129
18-73
MADS


16
G131
1-57
MADS


18
G133
1-57
MADS


20
G134
1-57
MADS


22
G135
1-57
MADS


24
G136
18-74
MADS


26
G137
1-57
MADS


28
G138
1-57
MADS


30
G139
1-57
MADS


32
G140
16-72
MADS


34
G142
2-57
MADS


36
G145
1-57
MADS


38
G146
1-57
MADS


40
G148
1-57
MADS


42
G151
2-57
MADS


44
G153
1-57
MADS


46
G155
1-57
MADS


48
G171
1-57
MADS


50
G172
12-68
MADS


52
G173
1-57
MADS


54
G200
12-116
MYB-(R1)R2R3


56
G224
7-114
PMR


58
G244
14-114
MYB-(R1)R2R3


60
G246
57-159
MYB-(R1)R2R3


62
G253
16-116
MYB-(R1)R2R3


64
G268
186-689
AKR


66
G287
293-354
MISC


68
G309
226-506
SCR


70
G314
54-300
SCR


72
G319
12-42
Z-CO-like


74
G324
245-291
RING/C3H2C3


76
G344
166-192
GATA/Zn


78
G351
77-97, 118-140
Z-C2H2


1380
G353
41-61, 84-104
Z-C2H2


1382
G354
42-62, 88-109
Z-C2H2


80
G355
49-69, 94-116
Z-C2H2


82
G366
40-60
Z-C2H2


84
G370
97-117
Z-C2H2


86
G372
141-180
RING/C3HC4


88
G374
35-67, 286-318
Z-ZPF


90
G380
637-677
RING/C3H2C3


92
G386
133-193
HB


94
G416
451-511
HB


96
G434
39-99
HB


98
G438
22-85
HB


100
G446
53-389
ARF


102
G468
86-102, 141-171
IAA


104
G478
186-281
SBP


106
G485
21-116
CAAT


108
G521
7-156
NAC


110
G549
1-395
MISC


112
G550
134-180
Z-Dof


114
G571
160-220, 441-452
bZIP


116
G581
339-396
HLH/MYC


118
G600
115-290
DBP


120
G624
327-406
ABI3/VP-1


122
G627
1-57
MADS


124
G646
55-97
Z-Dof


126
G651
5-31, 162-182, 208-231
Z-C2H2


128
G652
28-49, 137-151, 182-196
Z-CLDSH


130
G707
109-169
HB


132
G728
206-255
GARP


134
G730
169-217
GARP


136
G738
351-393
Z-Dof


138
G744
176-217
RING/C3H2C3


140
G752
439-479
RING/C3H2C3


142
G807
12-76
HS


144
G811
18-108
HS


146
G839
60-185, 290-353
AKR


148
G846
222-531, 679-719, 840-923
SWI/SNF


150
G852
225-593
SCR


152
G905
118-159
RING/C3H2C3


154
G916
293-349
WRKY


156
G926
174-226
CAAT


158
G957
12-182
NAC


160
G961
12-180
NAC


162
G975
4-71
AP2


164
G1011
2-57
MADS


166
G1013
114-170
WRKY


168
G1017
9-382
ARF


170
G1033
52-123
HMG


172
G1037
11-134, 200-248
GARP


174
G1082
1-53, 503-613
BZIPT2


176
G1100
96-137
RING/C3H2C3


178
G1108
363-403
RING/C3H2C3


180
G1113
85-128
RING/C3H2C3


182
G1128
181-247
AT-hook


184
G1136
397-474
HLH/MYC


186
G1142
63-123
HLH/MYC


188
G1150
887-907
PAZ


190
G1206
494-668
ENBP


192
G1247
18-141
MYB-(R1)R2R3


194
G1274
111-164
WRKY


196
G1276
158-224, 250-316
AP2


198
G1289
207-286, 464-493
AKR


200
G1313
32-135
MYB-(R1)R2R3


202
G1327
14-116
MYB-(R1)R2R3


204
G1340
54-142
TH


206
G1341
1-34, 288-398
BZIPT2


208
G1357
16-153
NAC


210
G1361
59-200
NAC


212
G1384
127-194
AP2


214
G1389
30-87
TEO


216
G1412
13-162
NAC


218
G1420
221-280
WRKY


220
G1423
6-62
MADS


222
G1446
1-405
MISC


224
G1451
22-357
ARF


226
G1452
30-177
NAC


228
G1468
95-115, 170-190
Z-C2H2


230
G1474
41-68
Z-C2H2


232
G1476
37-57
Z-C2H2


234
G1482
5-63
Z-CO-like


236
G1483
17-66
Z-CO-like


238
G1493
242-289
GARP


240
G1507
219-247
RING/C3HC4


242
G1510
230-263
GATA/Zn


244
G1535
109-169
HB


246
G1538
66-126
HB


248
G1539
76-136
HB


250
G1549
75-135
HB


252
G1554
238-287
GARP


254
G1556
19-67
GARP


256
G1557
19-67
GARP


258
G1585
55-115
HB


260
G1591
8-68
HB


262
G1593
227-290
HB


264
G1660
362-476
DBP


266
G1718
113-153
RING/C3H2C3


268
G1730
103-144
RING/C3H2C3


270
G1743
94-136
RING/C3H2C3


272
G1753
12-80
AP2


274
G1772
123-176
RING/C3HC4


276
G1779
190-239
GATA/zn


278
G1792
17-85
AP2


280
G1796
54-121
AP2


282
G1797
1-57
MADS


284
G1798
1-57
MADS


286
G1808
140-200
bZIP


288
G1816
31-81
MYB-related


290
G1823
205-252
GARP


292
G1825
55-103
GARP


294
G1832
67-87, 150-166, 213-233
Z-C2H2


296
G1837
1-53, 398-507
BZIPT2


298
G1840
87-154
AP2


300
G1846
16-83
AP2


302
G1850
56-149
HS


304
G1863
77-186
GRF-Iike


306
G1893
73-185
Z-C2H2


308
G1917
153-179
GATA/Zn


310
G1923
23-153
NAC


312
G1928
101-121, 178-198
Z-C2H2


314
G1932
9-76
AP2


316
G1938
74-143
PCF


318
G1945
49-71
AT-hook


320
G1957
52-143
ABI3/VP-1


322
G1968
64-84, 368-390
Z-C2H2


324
G1983
71-147
Z-C3H


326
G1985
37-57
Z-C2H2


328
G1988
5-50
Z-CO-like


330
G1990
184-204, 261-283
Z-C2H2


332
G1993
23-43
Z-C2H2


334
G1995
93-113
Z-C2H2


336
G1998
5-71
Z-CO-like


338
G1999
15-55
Z-CO-like


340
G2035
93-259
AKR


342
G2041
670-906, 1090-1175
SWI/SNF


344
G2051
7-158
NAC


346
G2060
204-263
WRKY


348
G2063
7-63
MADS


350
G2070
45-137
bZIP


352
G2071
307-358
bZIP


354
G2084
41-172
R1NG/C3HC4


356
G2085
214-241
GATA/Zn


358
G2106
56-139, 165-233
AP2


360
G2109
1-57
MADS


362
G2111
1-57
MADS


364
G2129
71-140
bZIP


1496
G2133
11-83
AP2


366
G2142
43-120
HLH/MYC


368
G2146
136-200
HLH/MYC


370
G2184
17-147
NAC


372
G2207
180-227, 546-627
bZIP-NIN


374
G2213
156-205
bZIP-NIN


376
G2226
103-144
RING/C3H2C3


378
G2227
199-239
RING/C3H2C3


380
G2239
128-169
RING/C3H2C3


382
G2251
89-132
RING/C3H2C3


384
G2269
136-177
RING/C3H2C3


386
G2298
4-71
AP2


388
G2311
5-58
MYB-related


390
G2317
48-110
MYB-related


392
G2319
32-120
MYB-related


394
G2334
82-118, 150-194
GRF-like


396
G2371
25-127
ABI3/VP-1


398
G2372
18-378
ARF


400
G2375
51-148
TH


402
G2382
90-177, 246-333
TH


404
G2394
355-395
RING/C3H2C3


406
G2404
319-359
RING/C3H2C3


408
G2432
64-106
Z-Dof


410
G2443
20-86
Z-CO-like


412
G2453
130-176
YABBY


414
G2455
136-153
YABBY


416
G2456
148-195
YABBY


418
G2457
110-127
YABBY


420
G2459
50-97
YABBY


422
G2467
25-118
HS


424
G2492
616-860
ENBP


426
G2505
9-137
NAC


428
G2515
1-57
MADS


430
G2525
196-308
DBP


432
G2536
5-135
NAC


434
G2543
31-91
HB


436
G2550
345-408
HB


438
G2559
60-170
DBP


440
G2565
243-292
GARP


442
G2567
18-384
ARF


444
G2570
235-283
GARP


446
G2571
133-200
AP2


448
G2574
225-284
WRKY


450
G2575
137-192
WRKY


452
G2579
52-119
AP2


454
G2585
103-162
WRKY


456
G2587
108-165
WRKY


458
G2592
119-429
TUBBY


460
G2597
62-200
TUBBY


462
G2603
104-389
TUBBY


464
G2604
34-64, 73-103
Z-LSDlike


466
G2616
79-139
HB


468
G2617
57-77
Z-C2H2


470
G2628
36-105
bZIP


472
G2632
170-221
CAAT


474
G2633
123-490
SCR


476
G2636
14-146
NAC


478
G2639
114-167
SRS


480
G2640
146-189
SRS


482
G2649
112-155
SRS


484
G2650
34-91
TEO


486
G2655
106-180
HLH/MYC


488
G2661
40-100
HLH/MYC


490
G2679
107-177
CPP


492
G2682
67-181
CPP


494
G2686
122-173
WRKY


496
G2690
46-113
AP2


498
G2691
78-145
AP2


500
G2694
1-446
OTHER


502
G2699
54-07
SCR


504
G2702
31-131
MYB-(R1)R2R3


506
G2717
5-58
MYB-related


508
G2718
21-76
MYB-related


510
G2723
12-174
MYB-related


512
G2741
140-205
GARP


514
G2743
201-249
GARP


516
G2747
19-113
ABI3/VP-1


518
G2754
198-393, 554-638
SWI/SNF


520
G2757
35-123, 348-434
TH


522
G2763
140-210
HLH/MYC


524
G2765
124-190
HLH/MYC


526
G2768
288-346
DBP


528
G2771
333-433
HLH/MYC


530
G2776
144-210
HLH/MYC


532
G2777
278-350
HLH/MYC


534
G2779
144-213
HLH/MYC


536
G2783
63-124, 151-235, 262-318
ACBF-like


538
G2784
139-260
DBP


540
G2790
137-200
HLH/MYC


542
G2802
48-196
NAC


544
G2805
2-169
NAC


546
G2826
75-95
Z-C2H2


548
G2830
245-266
Z-C2H2


550
G2832
11-31, 66-86, 317-337
Z-C2H2


552
G2834
246-266, 335-356
Z-C2H2


554
G2837
140-160
Z-C2H2


556
G2838
57-77
Z-C2H2


558
G2839
34-60, 85-113
Z-C2H2


560
G2846
266-329
HLH/MYC


562
G2847
205-268
HLH/MYC


564
G2850
318-381
HLH/MYC


566
G2851
248-309
HLH/MYC


568
G2854
110-250
ACBF-like


570
G2859
145-226
HLH/MYC


572
G2865
86-162
HLH/MYC


574
G2866
84-100, 139-168
IAA


576
G2869
26-409
ARF


578
G2884
228-276
GARP


580
G2885
196-243
GARP


582
G2887
4-180
NAC


584
G2888
41-61, 120-140
Z-C2H2


586
G2898
62-133
HMG


588
G2907
12-120, 854-923
PCGL


590
G2913
43-127
ARID


592
G2930
53-133
HLH/MYC


594
G2933
65-137
HLH/MYC


596
G2934
37-110
HLH/MYC


598
G2958
88-104, 143-172
IAA


600
G2964
41-63, 201-235
Z-C3H


602
G2967
66-88, 358-385
Z-C2H2


604
G2969
128-150
Z-C2H2


606
G2972
8-32, 129-149, 277-294
Z-C2H2


608
G2979
192-211
E2F


610
G2981
155-173
E2F


612
G2982
107-124
E2F


614
G2983
88-148
HB


616
G2990
54-109, 203-263
ZF-HB


618
G2992
29-84, 159-219
ZF-HB


620
G2993
85-138, 221-285
ZF-HB


622
G2996
75-126, 194-254
ZF-HB


624
G2998
74-127, 243-303
ZF-HB


626
G2999
82-131, 201-261
ZF-HB


628
G3002
6-50, 104-168
ZF-HB


630
G3003
131-280
Z-C2H2


632
G3008
10-275
EIL


634
G3017
133-201
HLH/MYC


636
G3021
110-155
HLH/MYC


638
G3032
285-333
GARP


640
G3044
222-311
HLH/MYC


642
G3054
77-96, 149-168
Z-C3H


644
G3055
97-115, 178-197, 266-287
Z-C3H


646
G3059
219-287
Z-C3H


648
G3060
42-61, 219-237
Z-C3H


650
G3061
73-90, 174-193
Z-C2H2


652
G3067
198-219
Z-C2H2


654
G3070
129-150
Z-C2H2


656
G3076
70-100, 182-209
bZIP-ZW2


658
G3083
75-105, 188-215
bZIP-ZW2


660
G3084
94-110, 148-177
IAA


662
G3086
297-376
HLH/MYC


664
G3091
34-131
PLATZ


666
G3094
7-143
PLATZ


668
G3095
16-151
PLATZ


670
G3111
111-152
RING/C3H2C3









Examples of some of the utilities that may be desirable in plants, and that may be provided by transforming the plants with the presently disclosed sequences, are listed in Table 6. Many of the transcription factors listed in Table 6 may be operably linked with a specific promoter that causes the transcription factor to be expressed in response to environmental, tissue-specific or temporal signals. For example, G370 induces ectopic trichomes on flowers but also produces small plants. The former may be desirable to produce insect or herbivore resistance, or increased cotton yield, but the latter may be undesirable with respect to yield in that it may reduce biomass. However, by operably linking G370 with a flower-specific promoter, one may achieve the desirable benefits of the gene without affecting overall biomass to a significant degree. For examples of flower specific promoters, see Kaiser et al. (supra). For examples of other tissue-specific, temporal-specific or inducible promoters, see the above discussion under the heading “Vectors, Promoters, and Expression Systems”.







TABLE 6







Genes, traits and utilities that affect plant characteristics












Transcription factor



Trait Category
Phenotypic alteration(s)
genes that impact traits
Utility





Abiotic stress
Effect of chilling on plants





Increased sensitivity
G2632; G2763; G2790;
Improved growth rate, earlier




G2885; G2993
Planting yield



Increased tolerance
G1274; G1357; G1779;




G1928; G2063; G2567;




G2579; G2650; G2771;




G2930; G2933



Germination in cold



Increased sensitivity
G134; G344; G651;
Temperature stress response




G1808; G2070; G2525;
manipulation




G2543; G2592; G2993
Earlier planting; improved



Increased tolerance
G224; G728; G807;
survival, yield




G1274; G1837; G2051;




G2317; G2603; G2784



Drought



Increased tolerance
G46; G47; G926;
Improved survival, vigor,




G975; G1206; G1274;
appearance, yield, range




G1357; G1452; G1792;




G2133; G2505; G2717;




G2982; G2999; G3076;




G3086



Freezing
G1206; G2982
Improved survival, vigor,





appearance, yield



Heat



Increased sensitivity
G550
Improved germination,



Increased tolerance
G3086
growth rate, later planting,





yield



Osmotic stress



Increased sensitivity
G155; G370 (KO);
Abiotic stress response




G1863; G1938; G2993;
manipulation




G2996



Increased tolerance
G47; G353; G916;
Improved germination rate,




G926; G1033; G1412;
survival, yield




G1452; G1730; G1753;




G1816; G2207; G2661;




G2717; G2776; G2839;




G2854; G2969



Salt tolerance



Altered response (one line more
G2394



tolerant, one line more sensitive)



Increased tolerance
G355; G624; G1017;
Improved germination rate,




G1037; G1538; G1557;
survival, yield; extended




G1660; G1837; G2035;
growth range




G2041; G2060; G2207;




G2317; G2319; G2394;




G2404; G2453; G2457;




G2691; G2717; G2992;




G2998; G2999; G3083;




G3086



Nitrogen stress



Sensitivity to N limitation
G707; G1136; G1483;




G1535; G1968; G1995;




G2718; G2990; G2992



Less sensitive to N limitation
G153; G200; G581;
Improved yield and nutrient




G839; G916; G1013;
stress tolerance, decreased




G1150; G1274; G1792;
fertilizer usage




G1816; G1988; G2239;




G2604; G2718; G2830;




G2913; G2981



Phosphate stress



Sensitivity to PO4 limitation
G1995



Less sensitive to PO4 limitation
G355; G624; G1988;
Improved yield and nutrient




G2142; G2972
stress tolerance, decreased





fertilizer usage


Altered expression
Induced by ABA
G224; G244; G355;
Modification of seed




G571; G1037; G1482;
development, seed dormancy,




G1507; G2070; G2085
cold and dehydration





tolerance



Altered by auxin
G151; G153; G224;
Regulation of cell division,




G244; G550; G807;
growth and maturation,




G1037; G1274; G1384;
particularly at shoot tips




G1482; G1535; G1923



Induced by salicylic acid
G140; G224; G374;
Resilience to heat or




1037; G1100; G1274;
physiological conditions that




G1507; G1538; G2070
result in high levels of





salicylic acid



After challenge with Erysiphe
G314; G571; G1274;
Yield, appearance, survival,




G1923; G2070; G2085
extended range



After challenge with Fusarium
G140; G153; G171;
Yield, appearance, survival,




G224; G434; G1384;
extended range




G1507; G1923



Induced by heat
G153; G171; G224;
Germination, growth rate,




G434; G550; G807;
later planting




G961; G1037; G1384;




G1412; G1482; G1507;




G1538; G1850; G1923;




G2070



Cold
G171; G224; G314;
Improved growth rate, earlier




G1274; G1730; G2070;
planting, yield




G2085; G2597



Osmotic stress
G571; G1274; G1412;
Abiotic stress response




G1482; G1730; G1923;
manipulation




G2085



Drought
G139; G244; G434;
Improved survival, vigor,




G571; G1100; G1412
appearance, yield



Salt
G224; G550; G1037
Improved germination rate,





survival, yield; extended





growth range


Herbicide
Glyphosate resistance
G2133
Generation of glyphosate





resistant plants, and increasing





plant resistance to oxidative





stress


Hormone sensitivity
Abscisic acid (ABA) sensitivity



Reduced sensitivity or insensitive
G12 (KO); G926;
Modification of seed



to ABA
G1357; G1412; G1452;
development, improved seed




G1893; G2109; G2146;
dormancy, cold and




G2207; G2382; G2617;
dehydration tolerance




G2717; G2854; G2865;




G2969; G2992; G3054;




G3055; G3067



1-Aminocyclopropane-1-
G12
Regulation of oxidative stress



carboxylate (ACC) sensitivity

and programmed cell death,



Increased sensitivity to ACC, the

delay over-ripening of fruit



immediate precursor of ethylene


Disease
Botrytis



Increased resistance or tolerance
G1792
Improved yield, appearance,





survival, extended range



Fusarium



Increased resistance or tolerance
G1792
Improved yield, appearance,





survival, extended range



Erysiphe



Increased resistance or tolerance
G1792
Improved yield, appearance,





survival, extended range


Growth regulator
Altered sugar sensing



Decreased tolerance to sugars
G155; G344; G478;
Alteration of energy balance,




G1420; G2111; G2763
photosynthetic rate,



Increased tolerance to sugars
G224; G905; G916;
carbohydrate accumulation,




G1033; G1108; G1493;
biomass production, source-




G1535; G1753; G1816;
sink relationships, senescence;




G2661; G2776; G2839;
alteration of storage




G2854; G2898
compound accumulation in





seeds



Altered C/N sensing
G153; G200; G581;
Alteration or control of




G707; G916; G1013;
assimilate partitioning




G1150; G1274; G1483;




G1535; G1816; G1988;




G2239; G2604; G2830;




G2913; G2981


Flowering time
Early flowering
G129; G131; G135;
Faster generation time;




G136; G137; G138;
synchrony of flowering;




G140; G142; G145;
additional harvests within a




G146; G148; G153;
growing season, shortening of




G155; G172; G200;
breeding programs




G246; G416; G485




(OE); G549; G600;




G627; G1011; G1037




(KO); G1142 (KO);




G1538; G1797; G1798;




G1823; G1825; G1988;




G2071; G2129; G2142;




G2184; G2311; G2372;




G2443; G2515; G2628;




G2633; G2639; G2650;




G2754; G2777; G2779;




G2802 (antisense




clone); G2805; G2832;




G2967; G2992; G3002;




G3032; G3044; G3060;




G3061; G3086



Late flowering
G2; G15; G47; G173;
Increased yield or biomass,




G309; G319; G324;
alleviate risk of transgenic




G372; G380; G434;
pollen escape, synchrony of




G485 (KO); G571
flowering




(KO); G581; G624;




G707; G738; G744;




G752; G839; G852;




G905; G1113; G1136;




G1142; G1150; G1276;




G1357; G1361; G1446;




G1451; G1452; G1468;




G1474; G1493; G1549;




G1554; G1863; G1945;




G1983; G1998; G1999;




G2106; G2146; G2207;




G2251; G2269; G2319;




G2334; G2432; G2559;




G2604; G2694; G2723;




G2741; G2743; G2763;




G2771; G2802 (sense




clone); G2838; G2846;




G2964; G2979; G2993;




G2998; G3003; G3021;




G3060; G3111


Development and
Altered flower structure


morphology
Stamen
G15; G129; G133;
Ornamental modification of




G1420; G2455; G2694;
plant architecture, improved




G2768
or reduced fertility to mitigate



Sepal
G129; G134; G140;
escape of transgenic pollen,




G1420; G2694; G2979;
improved fruit size, shape,




G3094
number or yield



Petal
G129; G133; G134;




G140; G1420; G2768;




G3094



Pedicel
G1420; G1539; G1591;




G2839; G2979; G2983



Carpel
G129; G133; G446;




G1539; G1591; G1796;




G2455; G2579; G2617;




G2694; G2768; G2983



Multiple alterations
G15; G550; G651;




G730; G1013; G1100;




G1128; G1420; G1549;




G1798; G1825; G1995;




G2226; G2457; G2455;




G2515; G2575; G2616;




G2639; G2640; G2649;




G2694; G2743; G2826;




G2838; G2859; G2884;




G3094



Changes in organ identity
G129; G133; G134;




G140



Enlarged floral organs
G15; G2979



Increase in flower organ number
G2768; G2979



Terminal flowers
G1798; G2515



Flower organs persisting
G1011; G1797



following fertilization



Siliques
G15; G2579; G2884



Broad, large rosettes
G1274



Loss of flower determinacy
G131; G135; G2768



Reduced fertility
G15; G549; G651;




G846; G1100; G1798;




G2372; G2579; G2616;




G2639; G2640; G2649;




G2768; G2884



Gamete lethal
G846



Altered shoot meristem
G438 (KO); G916;
Ornamental modification of



development
G1585; G1957; G2636;
plant architecture,




G2650; G2885
manipulation of growth and





development, increase leaf





numbers, modulation of





branching patterns to provide





improved yield or biomass



Inflorescence architectural



change



Altered inflorescence branching
G47; G446; G2571;
Ornamental modification of



pattern
G2146; G2571; G2694;
flower architecture; timing of




G2784; G2859
flowering; altered plant habit



Short internodes/bushy
G47; G253; G1274;
for yield or harvestability



inflorescences
G1474; G1593; G1743;
benefit; reduction in pollen




G1753; G1796; G2146;
production of genetically




G2226; G2550; G2251;
modified plants; manipulation




G2575; G2616; G2639;
of seasonality and annual or




G2640; G2649; G2958;
perennial habit; manipulation




G3021
of determinate vs.



Terminal flowers
G131; G135; G137;
indeterminate growth




G145; G148; G155;




G549; G1798; G2372;




G2515



Altered inflorescence
G131; G135; G549;



determinacy
G2372; G2515



Aerial rosette development
G1985; G1995; G2826;




G2838



Downward pedicels
G2839



Homeotic transformation
G129; G133; G134;




G140



Multiple inflorescence alterations
G446; G549; G1798;




G2616; G2694; G2784;




G2839; G3059



Altered branching pattern
G47; G438 (KO)
Ornamental modification of





plant architecture, improved





lodging resistance



Stem morphology and altered
G47
Modulation of lignin content;



vascular tissue structure

improvement of wood,





palatability of fruits and





vegetables



Apical dominance



Reduced apical dominance
G47
Ornamental modification of





plant architecture;, improved





lodging resistance



Altered trichome density;



development, or structure



Ectopic trichomes
G370; G2826
Ornamental modification of



Altered trichome development
G1539; G2983
plant architecture, increased



Increased trichome number or
G370; G1995; G2085;
plant product (e.g., diterpenes,



density
G2826; G2838
cotton) productivity, insect



Reduced or no trichomes
G1452; G1816; G2718
and herbivore resistance



Root development



Decreased root growth or
G651; G730; G2655;
Modification of root



secondary root development
G2747; G2992; G2993
architecture and mass



Decreased root branching
G651; G2993
Influence uptake of water and





nutrients



Increased root branching
G2747; G2992
Improved anchorage



Abnormal gravitropic response
G2983
Manipulation of root





development



Increased root hairs
G1816; G2718; G2983
Improved yield, stress





tolerance; anchorage



Altered cotyledon shape
G916; G1420; G1893;
Ornamental applications




G2432; G2636; G2859;




G3059



Altered hypocotyl shape, color,
G807; G916; G1510;
Ornamental applications;



development
G1988; G2771; G2859;
altered light response (see




G2884; G2993
“Light Response”, below)



Altered seed development,
G961
Modification of seed



ripening and germination

germination properties and





performance



Slow growth
G652; G1013; G1100;
Ornamental applications




G1468; G1535; G1549;




G1779; G1938; G2765;




G2784; G2826; G2834;




G2851; G3091; G3095



Fast growth
G807; G1476; G2617
Appearance, biomass, yield



Cell differentiation and cell
G1539; G1585; G1591;
Increase in carpel or fruit



proliferation
G2885; G2983
development; improve





regeneration of shoots from





callus in transformation or





micro-propagation systems



Cell expansion
G521
Control of cell elongation



Phase change and floral reversion
G370; G1985; G1995;
Improved yield, biomass,




G2826; G2838
manipulation of seasonality





and annual or perennial habit,





developmental plasticity in





response to environmental





stress



Senescence



Accelerated or premature
G652; G1033; G1128;
Improvement in response to



senescence
G1772; G2467; G2574;
disease, fruit ripening




G2783; G2907; G3059;




G3111



Reduced or delayed senescence
G571; G652 (KO);




G2536



Abnormal embryo development
G2884



Embryo lethal when knocked out
G374
Herbicide target



Gamete lethal
G846
Potential to prevent escape of





GMO pollen



Altered programmed cell death
G12



Lethality when overexpressed
G366; G1384; G1556;
Herbicide target; ablation of




G1832; G1850; G1957;
specific tissues or organs such




G1990; G2213; G2298;
as stamen to prevent pollen




G2505; G2570; G2587;
escape




G2869; G2887



Necrosis, formation of necrotic
G12; G1840
Disease resistance



lesions


Plant size
Increased plant size or biomass
G46; G268; G287;
Improved yield, biomass,




G314; G319; G324;
appearance




G438; G624; G852;




G1113; G1150; G1451;




G1468; G2334; G2536;




G2650; G2741; G2979



Large seedlings
G1313; G2679; G2694;
Increased survival and vigor




G2838
of seedlings, yield



Dwarfed or more compact plants
G131; G136; G253;
Dwarfism, lodging resistance,




G309; G370; G386;
manipulation of gibberellin




G549; G550; G600;
responses




G651; G652; G707;




G738; G811; G1011;




G1100; G1247; G1289;




G1340; G1423; G1474;




G1483; G1549; G1554;




G1593; G1753; G1772;




G1779; G1798; G1938;




G1983; G1993; G2085;




G2226; G2227; G2251;




G2372; G2375; G2453;




G2456; G2459; G2492;




G2515; G2550; G2565;




G2574; G2575; G2579;




G2616; G2628; G2640;




G2649; G2682; G2702;




G2757; G2783; G2839;




G2846; G2847; G2850;




G2884; G2934; G2958;




G2979; G2992; G3017;




G3059; G3091; G3111


Leaf morphology
Dark green leaves
G30; G253; G309;
Increased photosynthesis,




G707; G811; G957;
biomass, appearance, yield;




G1100; G1128; G1327;
nutritional value




G1341; G1357; G1389;




G1420; g1423; G1452;




G1482; G1510; G1535;




G1549; G1554; G1593;




G1743; G1792; G1796;




G1846; G1863; G1932;




G1938; G1983; G2085;




G2146; G2207; G2226;




G2251; G2334; G2371;




G2372; G2453; G2456;




G2457; G2459; G2550;




G2640; G2649; G2661;




G2690; G2694; G2771;




G2763; G2784; G2837;




G2838; G2846; G2847;




G2850; G2851; G2958;




G2993; G3021; G3059;




G3091; G3095; G3111



Change in leaf shape
G30; G129; G131;
Ornamental applications




G135; G136; G137;




G140; G148; G200;




G224; G253; G319;




G370; G372; G438;




G446; G468; G600;




G646; G651; G707;




G905; G957; G1011;




G1013; G1100; G1113;




G1128; G1142; G1247;




G1341; G1357; G1361;




G1389; G1420; G1452;




G1468; G1474; G1476;




G1493; G1535; G1538;




G1549; G1557; G1585;




G1593; G1743; G1796;




G1798; G1825; G1846;




G1863; G1893; G1917;




G1932; G1938; G1945;




G1983; G1993; G2084;




G2085; G2207; G2226;




G2227; G2251; G2334;




G2375; G2432; G2453;




G2455; G2456; G2457;




G2536; G2550; G2565;




G2575; G2579; G2604;




G2617; G2628; G2636;




G2639; G2640; G2649;




G2682; G2686; G2690;




G2694; G2699; G2702;




G2747; G2768; G2771;




G2784; G2837; G2839;




G2846; G2850; G2851;




G2859; G2866; G2888;




G2958; G2992; G3021;




G3044; G3059; G3084;




G3091; G3094; G3095;




G3111



Increased leaf size and mass
G268; G324; G438;
Increased yield, ornamental




G852; G1113; G1274;
applications




G1451; G2536; G2699;




G2768; G3008



Light green or gray leaves
G351; G600; G651;
Ornamental applications




G1468; G1718; G2565;




G2604; G2779; G2859;




G3044; G3070



Glossy leaves
G30; G370 (KO);
Ornamental applications,




G975; G1792; G2640;
manipulation of wax




G2649
composition, amount, or





distribution



Altered abaxial/adaxial polarity
G730
Modification of plant growth





and form


Seed morphology
Altered seed coloration
G581; G961; G2085;
Appearance




G2371



Seed size and shape



Altered seed shape
G652; G916; G961
Appearance



Large seed
G151; G581; G2085;




G2585; G2933


Leaf biochemistry
Increased leaf wax
G975
Insect, pathogen resistance



Leaf fatty acids



Increase in leaf fatty acids
G975


Seed biochemistry
Seed oil content



Increased oil content
G961 (KO); G1451
Improved oil yield, increased




(KO); G2830 (KO)
caloric content of food and





animal feed



Seed prenyl lipids
G652 (KO)
Increase in alpha-tocopherol





(vitamin E)


Light
Altered cotyledon
G30; G2754; G2859
Increased planting densities


response/shade
Altered hypocotyl
G30; G807; G916;
and yield enhancement


avoidance

G1082; G1510; G1988;




G2650; G2754; G2771;




G2859; G2884; G2993



Altered leaf orientation
G351; G1013; G2650;




G2694; G2993; G3032



Altered petiole
G478; G807; G1988;




G2650; G2694; G2754



Shade avoidance
G30; G246; G353;




G354; G2432; G2650;




G2754


Pigment
Increased anthocyanin levels
G253; G386; G707;
Enhanced health benefits,




G1482; G2453; G2456;
improved ornamental




G2459
appearance, increased stress



Decreased anthocyanin levels
G581; G2604; G2718
resistance, attraction of





pollinating and seed-





dispersing animals





Abbreviations:


N = nitrogen


P = phosphate


ABA = abscisic acid


C/N = carbon/nitrogen balance






Detailed Description of Genes Traits and Utilities that Affect Plant Characteristics

The following descriptions of traits and utilities associated with the present transcription factors offer a more comprehensive description than that provided in Table 6.
Abiotic Stress, General Considerations
Plant transcription factors can modulate gene expression, and, in turn, be modulated by the environmental experience of a plant. Significant alterations in a plant's environment invariably result in a change in the plant's transcription factor gene expression pattern. Altered transcription factor expression patterns generally result in phenotypic changes in the plant. Transcription factor gene product(s) in transgenic plants then differ(s) in amounts or proportions from that found in wild-type or non-transformed plants, and those transcription factors likely represent polypeptides that are used to alter the response to the environmental change. By way of example, it is well accepted in the art that analytical methods based on altered expression patterns may be used to screen for phenotypic changes in a plant far more effectively than can be achieved using traditional methods.
Abiotic stress: adult stage chilling. Enhanced chilling tolerance produced by modifying expression levels of transcription factors such as G1274, G1357, G1779, G1928, G2063, G2567, G2579, G2650, G2771, G2930, or G2933, for example, in plants may extend the effective growth range of chilling sensitive crop species by allowing earlier planting or later harvest. Improved chilling tolerance may be conferred by increased expression of glycerol-3-phosphate acetyltransferase in chloroplasts (see, for example, Wolteret al. (1992) EMBO J. 4685-4692, and Murata et al. (1992) Nature 356: 710-713).
Chilling tolerance could also serve as a model for understanding how plants adapt to water deficit. Both chilling and water stress share similar signal transduction pathways and tolerance/adaptation mechanisms. For example, acclimation to chilling temperatures can be induced by water stress or treatment with abscisic acid. Genes induced by low temperature include dehydrins (or LEA proteins). Dehydrins are also induced by salinity, abscisic acid, water stress and during the late stages of embryogenesis.
Another large impact of chilling occurs during post-harvest storage. For example, some fruits and vegetables do not store well at low temperatures (for example, bananas, avocados, melons, and tomatoes). The normal ripening process of the tomato is impaired if it is exposed to cool temperatures. Genes conferring resistance to chilling temperatures may enhance tolerance during post-harvest storage.
Abiotic stress: cold germination. The potential utility of presently disclosed transcription factor genes that increase tolerance to cold is to confer better germination and growth in cold conditions. Plants with modified expression levels of G224, G728, G807, G1274, G1837, G2051, G2317, G2603, or G2784 show less sensitivity to germination in cold conditions, indicating a role in regulation of cold responses. These genes might be engineered to manipulate the response to low temperature stress. Genes that would allow germination and seedling vigor in the cold would have highly significant utility in allowing seeds to be planted earlier in the season with a high rate of survival. Transcription factor genes that confer better survival in cooler climates allow a grower to move up planting time in the spring and extend the growing season further into autumn for higher crop yields. Germination of seeds and survival at temperatures significantly below that of the mean temperature required for germination of seeds and survival of non-transformed plants would increase the potential range of a crop plant into regions in which it would otherwise fail to thrive.
Abiotic Stress: Salt and Drought Tolerance
Plants are subject to a range of environmental challenges. Several of these, including salt stress, general osmotic stress, drought stress and freezing stress, have the ability to impact whole plant and cellular water availability. Not surprisingly, then, plant responses to this collection of stresses are related. In a recent review, Zhu notes that (Zhu (2002) Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 53: 247-273) “most studies on water stress signaling have focused on salt stress primarily because plant responses to salt and drought are closely related and the mechanisms overlap”. Many examples of similar responses (i.e., genetic pathways to this set of stresses have been documented. For example, the CBF transcription factors have been shown to condition resistance to salt, freezing and drought (Kasuga et al. (1999) Nature Biotech. 17: 287-291). The Arabidopsis rd29B gene is induced in response to both salt and dehydration stress, a process that is mediated largely through an ABA signal transduction process (Uno et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97: 11632-11637), resulting in altered activity of transcription factors that bind to an upstream element within the rd29B promoter. In Mesembryanthemum crystallinum (ice plant), Patharker and Cushman have shown that a calcium-dependent protein kinase (McCDPK1) is induced by exposure to both drought and salt stresses (Patharker and Cushman (2000) Plant J. 24: 679-691). The stress-induced kinase was also shown to phosphorylate a transcription factor, presumably altering its activity, although transcript levels of the target transcription factor are not altered in response to salt or drought stress. Similarly, Saijo et al. demonstrated that a rice salt/drought-induced calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (OsCDPK7) conferred increased salt and drought tolerance to rice when overexpressed (Saijo et al. (2000) Plant J. 23: 319-327).
Exposure to dehydration invokes similar survival strategies in plants as does freezing stress (see, for example, Yelenosky (1989) Plant Physiol 89: 444-451) and drought stress induces freezing tolerance (see, for example, Siminovitch et al. (1982) Plant Physiol 69: 250-255; and Guy et al. (1992) Planta 188: 265-270). In addition to the induction of cold-acclimation proteins, strategies that allow plants to survive in low water conditions may include, for example, reduced surface area, or surface oil or wax production.
Consequently, one skilled in the art would expect that some pathways involved in resistance to one of these stresses, and hence regulated by an individual transcription factor, will also be involved in resistance to another of these stresses, regulated by the same or homologous transcription factors. Of course, the overall resistance pathways are related, not identical, and therefore not all transcription factors controlling resistance to one stress will control resistance to the other stresses. Nonetheless, if a transcription factor conditions resistance to one of these stresses, it would be apparent to one skilled in the art to test for resistance to these related stresses. Modifying the expression of a number of presently disclosed transcription factor genes shown to confer increased tolerance to drought, e.g., G46, G47, G926, G975, G1206, G1274, G1357, G1452, G1792, G2133, G2505, G2717, G2982, G2999, G3076, and G3086, and increased tolerance to salt, e.g., G355, G624, G1017, G1037, G1538, G1557, G1660, G1837, G2035, G2041, G2060, G2207, G2317, G2319, G2404, G2453, G2457, G2691, G2717, G2992, G2998, G2999, G3083, and G3086, during germination, the seedling stage, and throughout a plant's life cycle, may thus be used to increase a plant's tolerance to low water conditions and provide the benefits of improved survival, increased yield and an extended geographic and temporal planting range.
Abiotic stress: freezing tolerance and osmotic stress. Modification of the expression of a number of presently disclosed transcription factor genes, G47, G353, G916, G926, G1033, G1206, G1412, G1452, G1730, G1753, G1816, G2207, G2661, G2717, G2776, G2839, G2854, G2969, or G2982, for example, may be used to increase germination rate or growth under adverse osmotic conditions, which could impact survival and yield of seeds and plants. Osmotic stresses may be regulated by specific molecular control mechanisms that include genes controlling water and ion movements, functional and structural stress-induced proteins, signal perception and transduction, and free radical scavenging, and many others (Wang et al. (2001) Acta Hort. (ISHS) 560: 285-292). Instigators of osmotic stress include freezing, drought and high salinity, each of which are discussed in more detail below.
In many ways, freezing, high salt and drought have similar effects on plants, not the least of which is the induction of common polypeptides that respond to these different stresses. For example, freezing is similar to water deficit in that freezing reduces the amount of water available to a plant. Exposure to freezing temperatures may lead to cellular dehydration as water leaves cells and forms ice crystals in intercellular spaces (Buchanan, supra). As with high salt concentration and freezing, the problems for plants caused by low water availability include mechanical stresses caused by the withdrawal of cellular water. Thus, the incorporation of transcription factors that modify a plant's response to osmotic stress into, for example, a crop or ornamental plant, may be useful in reducing damage or loss. Specific effects caused by freezing, high salt and drought are addressed below.
Abiotic stress: heat stress tolerance. The germination of many crops is also sensitive to high temperatures. Presently disclosed transcription factor genes, including, for example, G3086, that provide increased heat tolerance, are generally useful in producing plants that germinate and grow in hot conditions, may find particular use for crops that are planted late in the season, or extend the range of a plant by allowing growth in relatively hot climates.
Nutrient uptake and utilization: nitrogen and phosphorus. Presently disclosed transcription factor genes introduced into plants provide a means to improve uptake of essential nutrients, including nitrogenous compounds, phosphates, potassium, and trace minerals. The enhanced performance of, for example, G153, G200, G581, G839, G916, G1013, G1150, G1274, G1792, G1816, G1988, G2239, G2604, G2718, G2830, G2913, and G2981, and other overexpressing lines under low nitrogen conditions or G355, G624, G1988, G2142, and G2972 under low phosphorus conditions indicate that these genes and their homologs could be used to engineer crops that could thrive under conditions of reduced nutrient availability. Phosphorus, in particular, tends to be a limiting nutrient in soils and is generally added as a component in fertilizers. Young plants have a rapid intake of phosphate and sufficient phosphate is important for yield of root crops such as carrot, potato and parsnip.
The effect of these modifications is to increase the seedling germination and range of ornamental and crop plants. The utilities of presently disclosed transcription factor genes conferring tolerance to conditions of low nutrients also include cost savings to the grower by reducing the amounts of fertilizer needed, environmental benefits of reduced fertilizer runoff into watersheds; and improved yield and stress tolerance. In addition, by providing improved nitrogen uptake capability, these genes can be used to alter seed protein amounts and/or composition in such a way that could impact yield as well as the nutritional value and production of various food products.
Decreased herbicide sensitivity. Presently disclosed transcription factor genes, including G2133 and its equivalogs that confer resistance or tolerance to herbicides (e.g., glyphosate) will find use in providing means to increase herbicide applications without detriment to desirable plants. This would allow for the increased use of a particular herbicide in a local environment, with the effect of increased detriment to undesirable species and less harm to transgenic, desirable cultivars.
Knockouts of a number of the presently disclosed transcription factor genes have been shown to be lethal to developing embryos. Thus, these genes are potentially useful as herbicide targets.
Altered expression and hormone sensitivity: abscisic acid and auxin. Altering the expression levels of a number of the presently disclosed transcription factor genes, including G12, G224, G244, G355, G571, G926, G1037, G1357, G1412, G1452, G1482, G1507, G1893, G2070, G2085, G2109, G2146, G2207, G2382, G2617, G2717, G2854, G2865, G2969, G2992, G3054, G3055, or G3067, may be used to reduce a plant's sensitivity to ABA or render a plant insensitive to ABA exposure. ABA plays regulatory roles in a host of physiological processes in all higher as well as in lower plants (Davies et al. (1991) Abscisic Acid: Physiology and Biochemistry. Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford, UK; Zeevaart et al. (1988) Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49: 439-473; Shimizu-Sato et al. (2001) Plant Physiol 127:1405-1413). ABA mediates stress tolerance responses in higher plants, is a key signal compound that regulates stomatal aperture and, in concert with other plant signaling compounds, is implicated in mediating responses to pathogens and wounding or oxidative damage (for example, see Larkindale et al. (2002) Plant Physiol. 128: 682-695). In seeds, ABA promotes seed development, embryo maturation, synthesis of storage products (proteins and lipids), desiccation tolerance, and is involved in maintenance of dormancy (inhibition of germination), and apoptosis (Zeevaart et al. (1988) Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49: 439-473; Davies (1991), supra; Thomas (1993) Plant Cell 5:1401-1410; and Bethke et al. (1999) Plant Cell 11: 1033-1046). ABA also affects plant architecture, including root growth and morphology and root-to-shoot ratios. ABA action and metabolism is modulated not only by environmental signals but also by endogenous signals generated by metabolic feedback, transport, hormonal cross-talk and developmental stage. Manipulation of ABA levels, and hence by extension the sensitivity to ABA, has been described as a very promising means to improve productivity, performance and architecture in plants Zeevaart (1999) in: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plant Hormones, Hooykaas et al. eds, Elsevier Science pp 189-207; and Cutler et al. (1999) Trends Plant Sci. 4: 472-478).
A number of genes have been shown to be induced by cold acclimation in higher plants, including, for example, G171, G224, G1274, G1730, G2085, and G2597, and the proteins encoded by these genes are thought to play a role in protecting plant cells from injury, including freezing (Nagao et al. (2002) Plant Cell Physiol. 43: S168-S168). Since ABA mediates conversion of apical meristems into dormant buds, altered expression to ABA may increase protection of the buds from mechanical damage during winter. A plant's response to ABA also affects sprouting inhibition during premature warm spells. ABA is also important in protecting plants from drought tolerance. Thus, by affecting ABA sensitivity, introduced transcription factor genes may affect cold sensitivity, yield and survival, and plants with G12 knocked-out or plants overexpressing G926, G1357, G1412, G1452, G1893, G2109, G2146, G2207, G2382, G2617, G2717, G2854, G2865, G2969, G2992, G3054, G3055, and G3067, may have modified ABA responses that influence seed development and dormancy, as well as cold and dehydration tolerance, and survival.
“Auxin” refers to a class of plant hormones, including indoleacetic acid (IAA), having a variety of effects, such as phototropic response through the stimulation of cell elongation, stimulation of secondary growth, and the development of leaf traces and fruit. Specifically, auxin is involved in the regulation of cell division, particularly at shoot tips. Transcription factors genes that regulate a plant's response to auxin thus provide a means for controlling shoot tip development and secondary growth, which in turn can be used to manipulate plant growth and development.
Disease resistance or tolerance: Erysiphe, Fusarium, Botrytis, and other pathogens. A number of the presently disclosed transcription factor genes have been induced to be expressed (e.g., G140, G171, G224, G434, G571, G1100, G1274, G1384, G1507, G1538, G1923, and G2085), or have been shown to provide resistance or tolerance (e.g., G1792) after challenge with more than one pathogen, including fungal pathogens Fusarium oxysporum, Botrytis cinerea and Erysiphe orontii. Modification of the expression levels of one or more transcription factor genes may provide some benefit to the plant to help prevent or overcome infestation. The mechanisms by which the transcription factors work could include changing surface characteristics such as waxes, oils, or cell wall composition and thickness, or by the activation of signal transduction pathways that regulate plant defenses in response to attacks by pathogens (including, for example, reactive oxygen species, anti-fungal proteins, defensins, thionins, glucanases, and chitinases). Another means to combat fungal and other pathogens is by accelerating local cell death or senescence, mechanisms used to impair the spread of pathogenic microorganisms throughout a plant. For instance, the best known example of accelerated cell death is the resistance gene-mediated hypersensitive response, which causes localized cell death at an infection site and initiates a systemic defense response. Because many defenses, signaling molecules, and signal transduction pathways are common to defense against different pathogens and pests, such as fungal, bacterial, oomycete, nematode, and insect, transcription factors that are implicated in defense responses against the fungal pathogens tested may also function in defense against other pathogens and pests.
Growth Regulator: Sugar Sensing.
In addition to their important role as an energy source and structural component of the plant cell, sugars are central regulatory molecules that control several aspects of plant physiology, metabolism and development (Hsieh et al. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 13965-13970). It is thought that this control is achieved by regulating gene expression and, in higher plants, sugars have been shown to repress or activate plant genes involved in many essential processes such as photosynthesis, glyoxylate metabolism, respiration, starch and sucrose synthesis and degradation, pathogen response, wounding response, cell cycle regulation, pigmentation, flowering and senescence. The mechanisms by which sugars control gene expression are not understood.
Several sugar-sensing mutants have turned out to be allelic to abscisic acid (ABA) and ethylene mutants. ABA is found in all photosynthetic organisms and acts as a key regulator of transpiration, stress responses, embryogenesis, and seed germination. Most ABA effects are related to the compound acting as a signal of decreased water availability, whereby it triggers a reduction in water loss, slows growth, and mediates adaptive responses. However, ABA also influences plant growth and development via interactions with other phytohormones. Physiological and molecular studies indicate that maize and Arabidopsis have almost identical pathways with regard to ABA biosynthesis and signal transduction. For further review, see Finkelstein and Rock ((2002) Abscisic acid biosynthesis and response (In The Arabidopsis Book, Editors: Somerville and Meyerowitz (American Society of Plant Biologists, Rockville, Md.).
This potentially implicates G155, G224, G344, G478, G905, G916, G1033, G1108, G1420, G1493, G1535, G1753, G1816, G2111, G2661, G2763, G2776, G2839, G2854, G2898 and related transcription factors in hormone signaling based on the sucrose sugar sensing phenotype of transgenic lines overexpressing these polypeptides. On the other hand, the sucrose treatment used in these experiments (9.5% w/v) could also be an osmotic stress. Therefore, one could interpret these data as an indication that these transgenic lines overexpressing are more tolerant to osmotic stress. However, it is well known that plant responses to ABA, osmotic and other stress may be linked, and these different treatments may even act in a synergistic manner to increase the degree of a response. For example, Xiong, Ishitani, and Zhu ((1999) Plant Physiol. 119: 205-212) have shown that genetic and molecular studies may be used to show extensive interaction between osmotic stress, temperature stress, and ABA responses in plants. These investigators analyzed the expression of RD29A-LUC in response to various treatment regimes in Arabidopsis. The RD29A promoter contains both the ABA-responsive and the dehydration-responsive element—also termed the C-repeat—and can be activated by osmotic stress, low temperature, or ABA treatment; transcription of the RD29A gene in response to osmotic and cold stresses is mediated by both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways (Xiong, Ishitani, and Zhu (1999) supra). LUC refers to the firefly luciferase coding sequence, which, in this case, was driven by the stress responsive RD29A promoter. The results revealed both positive and negative interactions, depending on the nature and duration of the treatments. Low temperature stress was found to impair osmotic signaling but moderate heat stress strongly enhanced osmotic stress induction, thus acting synergistically with osmotic signaling pathways. In this study, the authors reported that osmotic stress and ABA could act synergistically by showing that the treatments simultaneously induced transgene and endogenous gene expression. Similar results were reported by Bostock and Quatrano ((1992) Plant Physiol. 98: 1356-1363), who found that osmotic stress and ABA act synergistically and induce maize Em gene expression. Ishitani et al (1997) Plant Cell 9: 1935-1949) isolated a group of Arabidopsis single-gene mutations that confer enhanced responses to both osmotic stress and ABA. The nature of the recovery of these mutants from osmotic stress and ABA treatment indicated that although separate signaling pathways exist for osmotic stress and ABA, the pathways share a number of components; these common components may mediate synergistic interactions between osmotic stress and ABA. Thus, contrary to the previously held belief that ABA-dependent and ABA-independent stress signaling pathways act in a parallel manner, our data reveal that these pathways cross talk and converge to activate stress gene expression.
Because sugars are important signaling molecules, the ability to control either the concentration of a signaling sugar or how the plant perceives or responds to a signaling sugar could be used to control plant development, physiology or metabolism. For example, the flux of sucrose (a disaccharide sugar used for systemically transporting carbon and energy in most plants) has been shown to affect gene expression and alter storage compound accumulation in seeds. Manipulation of the sucrose-signaling pathway in seeds may therefore cause seeds to have more protein, oil or carbohydrate, depending on the type of manipulation. Similarly, in tubers, sucrose is converted to starch which is used as an energy store. It is thought that sugar signaling pathways may partially determine the levels of starch synthesized in the tubers. The manipulation of sugar signaling in tubers could lead to tubers with a higher starch content.
Thus, the presently disclosed transcription factor genes that manipulate the sugar signal transduction pathway may lead to altered gene expression to produce plants with desirable traits. In particular, manipulation of sugar signal transduction pathways could be used to alter source-sink relationships in seeds, tubers, roots and other storage organs leading to increase in yield.
Growth regulator: carbon and nitrogen balance. A number of the transcription factor-overexpressing lines, including G153, G200, G581, G707, G916, G1013, G1150, G1274, G1483, G1535, G1816, G1988, G2239, G2604, G2830, G2913, and G2981, may be used to produce plants with altered C/N sensing. These plants may, for example, make less anthocyanin on high sucrose plus glutamine, indicating that these genes can be used to modify carbon and nitrogen status, and hence assimilate partitioning (assimilate partitioning refers to the manner in which an essential element, such as nitrogen, is distributed among different pools inside a plant, generally in a reduced form, for the purpose of transport to various tissues).
Flowering time: early and late flowering. Presently disclosed transcription factor genes that accelerate flowering, which include G129, G131, G135, G136, G137, G138, G140, G142, G145, G146, G148, G153, G155, G172, G200, G246, G416, G485, G549, G600, G627, G1011, G1037, G1142, G1538, G1797, G1798, G1823, G1825, G1988, G2071, G2129, G2142, G2184, G2311, G2372, G2443, G2515, G2628, G2633, G2639, G2650, G2754, G2777, G2779, G2802, G2805, G2832, G2967, G2992, G3002, G3032, G3044, G3060, G3061, and G3086, could have valuable applications in such programs, since they allow much faster generation times. In a number of species, for example, broccoli, cauliflower, where the reproductive parts of the plants constitute the crop and the vegetative tissues are discarded, it would be advantageous to accelerate time to flowering. Accelerating flowering could shorten crop and tree breeding programs. Additionally, in some instances, a faster generation time would allow additional harvests of a crop to be made within a given growing season. A number of Arabidopsis genes have already been shown to accelerate flowering when constitutively expressed. These include LEAFY, APETALA1 and CONSTANS (Mandel et al. (1995) Nature 377: 522-524; Weigel and Nilsson (1995) Nature 377: 495-500; Simon et al. (1996) Nature 384: 59-62).
By regulating the expression of potential flowering using inducible promoters, flowering could be triggered by application of an inducer chemical. This would allow flowering to be synchronized across a crop and facilitate more efficient harvesting. Such inducible systems could also be used to tune the flowering of crop varieties to different latitudes. At present, species such as soybean and cotton are available as a series of maturity groups that are suitable for different latitudes on the basis of their flowering time (which is governed by day-length). A system in which flowering could be chemically controlled would allow a single high-yielding northern maturity group to be grown at any latitude. In southern regions such plants could be grown for longer periods before flowering was induced, thereby increasing yields. In more northern areas, the induction would be used to ensure that the crop flowers prior to the first winter frosts.
In a sizeable number of species, for example, root crops, where the vegetative parts of the plants constitute the crop and the reproductive tissues are discarded, it is advantageous to identify and incorporate transcription factor genes that delay or prevent flowering in order to prevent resources being diverted into reproductive development. For example, G2, G15, G47, G173, G309, G319, G324, G372, G380, G434, G485, G571, G581, G624, G707, G738, G744, G752, G839, G852, G905, G1113, G1136, G1142, G1150, G1276, G1357, G1361, G1446, G1451, G1452, G1468, G1474, G1493, G1549, G1554, G1863, G1945, G1983, G1998, G1999, G2106, G2146, G2207, G2251, G2269, G2319, G2334, G2432, G2559, G2604, G2694, G2723, G2741, G2743, G2763, G2771, G2802, G2838, G2846, G2964, G2979, G2993, G2998, G3003, G3021, G3060, and G3111 have been shown to delay flowering time in plants. Extending vegetative development with presently disclosed transcription factor genes could thus bring about large increases in yields. Prevention of flowering can help maximize vegetative yields and prevent escape of genetically modified organism (GMO) pollen.
Presently disclosed transcription factors that extend flowering time have utility in engineering plants with longer-lasting flowers for the horticulture industry, and for extending the time in which the plant is fertile.
Altered flower structure and inflorescence: aerial rosettes, architecture, branching short internodes, terminal flowers and phase change. Presently disclosed transgenic transcription factors such as G15, G129, G131, G133, G134, G135, G140, G446, G549, G550, G651, G730, G846, G1011, G1013, G1100, G1128, G1274, G1420, G1539, G1549, G1591, G1796, G1797, G1798, G1825, G995, G2226, G2372, G2455, G2457, G2515, G2575, G2579, G2616, G2617, G2639, G2640, G2649, G2694, G2743, G2768, G2826, G2838, G2839, G2859, G2884, G2979, G2983, and G3094 have been used to create plants with larger flowers or arrangements of flowers that are distinct from wild-type or non-transformed cultivars. This would likely have the most value for the ornamental horticulture industry, where larger flowers or interesting floral configurations are generally preferred and command the highest prices.
Flower structure may have advantageous or deleterious effects on fertility, and could be used, for example, to decrease fertility by the absence, reduction or screening of reproductive components. In fact, plants that overexpress a sizable number of the presently disclosed transcription factor genes, including G15, G549, G651, G846, G1100, G1798, G2372, G2579, G2616, G2639, G2640, G2649, G2768, and G2884, have been shown to possess reduced fertility compared with control plants. These could be desirable traits, as low fertility could be exploited to prevent or minimize the escape of the pollen of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into the environment.
The alterations in shoot architecture seen in the lines in which the expression G47, G446, G2571, G2146, G2571, G2694, G2784, or G2859, for example, was modified indicates that these genes can be used to manipulate inflorescence branching patterns. This could influence yield and offer the potential for more effective harvesting techniques. For example, a “self pruning” mutation of tomato results in a determinate growth pattern and facilitates mechanical harvesting (Pnueli et al. (2001) Plant Cell 13(12): 2687-702).
Although the fertility of plants overexpressing some of the lines in which the present transcription factors (e.g., G2579) expression levels were poor, siliques of these plants appeared to grow out fairly extensively in many instances, indication that these genes may be producing parthenocarpic effects (fruit development in the absence of seed set), and may have utility in producing seedless fruit.
One interesting application for manipulation of flower structure, for example, by introduced transcription factors could be in the increased production of edible flowers or flower parts, including saffron, which is derived from the stigmas of Crocus sativus. 
A number of the presently disclosed transcription factors may affect the timing of phase changes in plants (e.g., G370, G1985, G1995, G2826, and G2838). Since the timing or phase changes generally affects a plant's eventual size, these genes may prove beneficial by providing means for improving yield and biomass.
General development and morphology: shoot meristem and branching patterns. Presently disclosed transcription factor genes, when introduced into plants, may be used to modify branching patterns (e.g., by knocking-out G438, and overexpression of G916, G1585, G1957, G2636, G2650, and G2885), for example, by causing stem bifurcations in developing shoots in which the shoot meristems split to form two or three separate shoots. These transcription factors and their functional equivalogs may thus be used to manipulate branching. This would provide a unique appearance, which may be desirable in ornamental applications, and may be used to modify lateral branching for use in the forestry industry. A reduction in the formation of lateral branches could reduce knot formation. Conversely, increasing the number of lateral branches could provide utility when a plant is used as a view- or windscreen. Transcription factors that cause primary shoots to become ‘kinked’ at each coflorescence node (e.g., G47) may be used to manipulate plant structure and provide for a unique ornamental appearance.
General development and morphology: apical dominance: The modified expression of presently disclosed transcription factors (e.g., G47, and its equivalogs) that reduce apical dominance could be used in ornamental horticulture, for example, to modify plant architecture, for example, to produce a shorter, more bushy stature than wild type. The latter form would have ornamental utility as well as provide increased resistance to lodging.
Development and morphology: trichomes. Several of the presently disclosed transcription factor genes have been used to modify trichome number, density, trichome cell fate or amount of trichome products produced by plants. These include G370, G1452, G1539, G1816, G1995, G2085, G2718, G2826, G2838, and G2983. In most cases where the metabolic pathways are impossible to engineer, increasing trichome density or size on leaves may be the only way to increase plant productivity. Thus, by increasing trichome density, size or type, trichome-affecting genes and their homologs would have profound utilities in molecular farming practices and increasing the yield of cotton fibers.
If the effects on trichome patterning reflect a general change in heterochronic processes, trichome-affecting transcription factors or their homologs can be used to modify the way meristems and/or cells develop during different phases of the plant life cycle. In particular, altering the timing of phase changes could afford positive effects on yield and biomass production.
General development and morphology: stem morphology and altered vascular tissue structure. Plants in which expression of transcription factor gene that modify stem morphology or lignin content is modified may be used to affect overall plant architecture and the distribution of lignified fiber cells within the stem.
Modulating lignin content might allow the quality of wood used for furniture or construction to be improved. Lignin is energy rich; increasing lignin composition could therefore be valuable in raising the energy content of wood used for fuel. Conversely, the pulp and paper industries seek wood with a reduced lignin content. Currently, lignin must be removed in a costly process that involves the use of many polluting chemicals. Consequently, lignin is a serious barrier to efficient pulp and paper production (Tzfira et al. (1998) TIBTECH 16: 439-446; Robinson (1999) Nature Biotechnology 17: 27-30). In addition to forest biotechnology applications, changing lignin content by selectively expressing or repressing transcription factors in fruits and vegetables might increase their palatability.
Transcription factors that modify stem structure, including G47 and its equivalogs, may also be used to achieve reduction of higher-order shoot development, resulting in significant plant architecture modification. Overexpression of the genes that encode these transcription factors in woody plants might result in trees that lack side branches, and have fewer knots in the wood. Altering branching patterns could also have applications amongst ornamental and agricultural crops. For example, applications might exist in any species where secondary shoots currently have to be removed manually, or where changes in branching pattern could increase yield or facilitate more efficient harvesting.
General development and morphology: altered root development. By modifying the structure or development of roots by modifying expression levels of one or more of the presently disclosed transcription factor genes, including G651, G730, G1816, G2655, G2718, G2747, G2983, G2992, G2993, and their equivalogs, plants may be produced that have the capacity to thrive in otherwise unproductive soils. For example, grape roots extending further into rocky soils would provide greater anchorage, greater coverage with increased branching, or would remain viable in waterlogged soils, thus increasing the effective planting range of the crop and/or increasing yield and survival. It may be advantageous to manipulate a plant to produce short roots, as when a soil in which the plant will be growing is occasionally flooded, or when pathogenic fungi or disease-causing nematodes are prevalent.
In addition, presently disclosed transcription factors including G1816, G2718, G2983 and their equivalogs, may be used to increase root hair density and thus increase tolerance to abiotic stresses, thereby improving yield and quality.
Development and morphology: cotyledon, hypocotyl. The morphological phenotypes shown by plants overexpressing several of the transcription factor genes in Table 6 indicate that these genes, including those that produce altered cotyledons (e.g., G916, G1420, G1893, G2432, G2636, G2859, and G3059) and hypocotyls (G807, G916, G1510, G1988, G2771, G2859, G2884, G2993), can be used to manipulate light responses such as shade avoidance. As these genes also alter plant architecture, they may find use in the ornamental horticulture industry.
Development and morphology: seed development, ripening and germination rate. A number of the presently disclosed transcription factor genes (e.g., G961) have been shown to modify seed development and germination rate, including when the seeds are in conditions normally unfavorable for germination (e.g., cold, heat or salt stress, or in the presence of ABA), and may, along with functional equivalogs, thus be used to modify and improve germination rates under adverse conditions.
Growth rate and development: fast growth. A number of the presently disclosed transcription factor genes, including G807, G1476, and G2617, could be used to accelerate seedling growth, and thereby allow a crop to become established faster. This would minimize exposure to stress conditions at early stages of growth when the plants are most sensitive. Additionally, it can allow a crop to grow faster than competing weed species.
A number of these transcription factors have also been shown to increase growth rate of mature plants to a significant extent, including more rapid growth and development of reproductive organs. This provides utility for regions with short growing seasons. Accelerating plant growth would also improve early yield or increase biomass at an earlier stage, when such is desirable (for example, in producing vegetable crops or forestry products).
General development and morphology: slow growth rate. A number of the presently disclosed transcription factor genes, including G652, G1013, G1100, G1468, G1535, G1549, G1779, G1938, G2765, G2784, G2826, G2834, G2851, G3091, and G3095, have been shown to have significant effects on retarding plant growth rate and development. These observations have included, for example, delayed growth and development of reproductive organs. Slow growing plants may be highly desirable to ornamental horticulturists, both for providing house plants that display little change in their appearance over time, or outdoor plants for which wild-type or rapid growth is undesirable (e.g., ornamental palm trees). Slow growth may also provide for a prolonged fruiting period, thus extending the harvesting season, particularly in regions with long growing seasons. Slow growth could also provide a prolonged period in which pollen is available for improved self- or cross-fertilization, or cross-fertilization of cultivars that normally flower over non-overlapping time periods. The latter aspect may be particularly useful to plants comprising two or more distinct grafted cultivars (e.g., fruit trees) with normally non-overlapping flowering periods.
General development and morphology: senescence. Presently disclosed transcription factor genes may be used to alter senescence responses in plants. Although leaf senescence is thought to be an evolutionary adaptation to recycle nutrients, the ability to control senescence in an agricultural setting has significant value. For example, a delay in leaf senescence in some maize hybrids is associated with a significant increase in yields and a delay of a few days in the senescence of soybean plants can have a large impact on yield. In an experimental setting, tobacco plants engineered to inhibit leaf senescence had a longer photosynthetic lifespan, and produced a 50% increase in dry weight and seed yield (Gan and Amasino (1995) Science 270: 1986-1988). Delayed flower senescence caused by knocking out G652 or overexpressing G571, G2536, for example, may generate plants that retain their blossoms longer and this may be of potential interest to the ornamental horticulture industry, and delayed foliar and fruit senescence could improve post-harvest shelf-life of produce.
Premature senescence caused by, for example, G652, G1033, G1128, G1772, G2467, G2574, G2783, G2907, G3059, G3111 and their equivalogs may be used to improve a plant's response to disease and hasten fruit ripening.
Growth rate and development: lethality and necrosis. Overexpression of transcription factors, for example, G12, G366, G1384, G1556, G1840, G1832, G1840, G1850, G1957, G1990, G2213, G2298, G2505, G2570, G2587, G2869, G2887 and their equivalogs that have a role in regulating cell death may be used to induce lethality in specific tissues or necrosis in response to pathogen attack. For example, if a transcription factor gene inducing lethality or necrosis was specifically active in gametes (e.g., (G846), embryos (e.g., G374 knockouts) or reproductive organs, its expression in these tissues would lead to ablation and subsequent male or female sterility. Alternatively, under pathogen-regulated expression, a necrosis-inducing transcription factor can restrict the spread of a pathogen infection through a plant.
Plant Size: Large Plants and Increased Biomass.
Plants overexpressing G46, G268, G287, G314, G319, G324, G438, G624, G852, G1113, G1150, G1451, G1468, G2334, G2536, G2650, G2741, and G2979, for example, have been shown to be larger than controls. For some ornamental plants, the ability to provide larger varieties with these genes or their equivalogs may be highly desirable. More significantly, crop species overexpressing these genes from diverse species would also produce higher yields on larger cultivars, particularly those in which the vegetative portion of the plant is edible.
Overexpression of these genes can confer increased stress tolerance as well as increased biomass, and the increased biomass appears to be related to the particular mechanism of stress tolerance exhibited by these genes. The decision for a lateral organ to continue growth and expansion versus entering late development phases (growth cessation and senescence) is controlled genetically and hormonally, including regulation at an organ size checkpoint (e.g., Mizukami (1001) Curr Opinion Plant Biol 4: 533-39; Mizukami and Fisher (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 942-47; Hu et al. Plant Cell 15:1591)). Organ size is controlled by the meristematic competence of organ cells, with increased meristemafic competence leading to increased organ size (both leaves and stems). Plant hormones can impact plant organ size, with ethylene pathway overexpression leading to reduced organ size. There are also suggestions that auxin plays a determinative role in organ size. Stress responses can impact hormone levels in plant tissues, including ABA and ethylene levels. Thus, overexpression of G1073 appears to alter environmental (e.g., stress) inputs to the organ size checkpoint, thus enhancing organ size
Plant size: large seedlings. Presently disclosed transcription factor genes, that produce large seedlings can be used to produce crops that become established faster. Large seedlings are generally hardier, less vulnerable to stress, and better able to out-compete weed species. Seedlings in which expression of some of the presently disclosed transcription factors, including G1313, G2679, G2694, and G2838, for example, was modified, have been shown to possess larger cotyledons and/or were more developmentally advanced than control plants. Rapid seedling development made possible by manipulating expression of these genes or their equivalogs is likely to reduce loss due to diseases particularly prevalent at the seedling stage (e.g., damping off) and is thus important for survivability of plants germinating in the field or in controlled environments.
Plant size: dwarfed plants. Presently disclosed transcription factor genes, including G131, G136, G253, G309, G370, G386, G549, G550, G600, G651, G652, G707, G738, G811, G1011, G1100, G1247, G1289, G1340, G1423, G1474, G1483, G1549, G1554, G1593, G1753, G1772, G1779, G1798, G1938, G1983, G1993, G2085, G2226, G2227, G2251, G2372, G2375, G2453, G2456, G2459, G2492, G2515, G2550, G2565, G2574, G2575, G2579, G2616, G2628, G2640, G2649, G2682, G2702, G2757, G2783, G2839, G2846, G2847, G2850, G2884, G2934, G2958, G2979, G2992, G3017, G3059, G3091, and G3111 and their equivalogs can be used to decrease plant stature and may produce plants that are more resistant to damage by wind and rain, have improved lodging resistance, or more resistant to heat or low humidity or water deficit. Dwarf plants are also of significant interest to the ornamental horticulture industry, and particularly for home garden applications for which space availability may be limited.
Growth rate and development: Cell proliferation and differentiation. Transcription factors may be used regulate cell proliferation and/or differentiation in plants. Control of these processes could have valuable applications in plant transformation, cell culture or micro-propagation systems, as well as in control of the proliferation of particular useful tissues or cell types. Transcription factors that induce the proliferation of undifferentiated cells, such as G1539, G1585, G1591, G2885, and G2983, can be operably linked with an inducible promoter to promote the formation of callus that can be used for transformation or production of cell suspension cultures. Transcription factors that promote differentiation of shoots could be used in transformation or micro-propagation systems, where regeneration of shoots from callus is currently problematic. In addition, transcription factors that regulate the differentiation of specific tissues could be used to increase the proportion of these tissues in a plant. Transcription factors may promote the differentiation of carpel tissue, and these genes could be applied to commercial species to induce formation of increased numbers of carpels or fruits. A particular application might exist in saffron, one of the world's most expensive spices. Saffron filaments, or threads, are actually the dried stigmas of the saffron flower, Crocus sativus Linneaus. Each flower contains only three stigmas, and more than 75,000 of these flowers are needed to produce just one pound of saffron filaments. An increase in carpel number would increase the quantity of stigmatic tissue and improve yield.
Growth rate and development: cell expansion. Plant growth results from a combination of cell division and cell expansion. Transcription factors may be useful in regulation of cell expansion. Altered regulation of cell expansion (for example, by G521) could affect stem length, an important agronomic characteristic. For instance, short cultivars of wheat contributed to the Green Revolution, because plants that put fewer resources into stem elongation allocate more resources into developing seed and produce higher yield. These plants are also less vulnerable to wind and rain damage. These cultivars were found to be altered in their sensitivity to gibberellins, hormones that regulate stem elongation through control of both cell expansion and cell division. Altered cell expansion in leaves could also produce novel and ornamental plant forms.
Leaf morphology: dark leaves. Color-affecting components in leaves include chlorophylls (generally green), anthocyanins (generally red to blue) and carotenoids (generally yellow to red). Transcription factor genes that increase these pigments in leaves, including G30, G253, G309, G707, G811, G957, G1100, G1128, G1327, G1341, G1357, G1389, G1420, G1423, G1452, G1482, G1510, G1535, G1549, G1554, G1593, G1743, G1792, G1796, G1846, G1863, G1932, G1938, G1983, G2085, G2146, G2207, G2226, G2251, G2334, G2371, G2372, G2453, G2456, G2457, G2459, G2550, G2640, G2649, G2661, G2690, G2694, G2771, G2763, G2784, G2837, G2838, G2846, G2847, G2850, G2851, G2958, G2993, G3021, G3059, G3091, G3095, and G3111, may positively affect a plant's value to the ornamental horticulture industry. Variegated varieties, in particular, would show improved contrast. Other uses that result from overexpression of transcription factor genes include improvements in the nutritional value of foodstuffs. For example, lutein is an important nutraceutical; lutein-rich diets have been shown to help prevent age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), the leading cause of blindness in elderly people. Consumption of dark green leafy vegetables has been shown in clinical studies to reduce the risk of ARMD.
Enhanced chlorophyll and carotenoid levels could also improve yield in crop plants. Lutein, like other xanthophylls such as zeaxanthin and violaxanthin, is an essential component in the protection of the plant against the damaging effects of excessive light. Specifically, lutein contributes, directly or indirectly, to the rapid rise of non-photochemical quenching in plants exposed to high light. Crop plants engineered to contain higher levels of lutein could therefore have improved photo-protection, leading to less oxidative damage and better growth under high light (e.g., during long summer days, or at higher altitudes or lower latitudes than those at which a non-transformed plant would thrive). Additionally, elevated chlorophyll levels increases photosynthetic capacity.
Leaf morphology: changes in leaf shape. Presently disclosed transcription factors produce marked and diverse effects on leaf development and shape, and include G30 and many others (see Table 6, “Change in leaf shape”). At early stages of growth, transgenic seedlings have developed narrow, upward pointing leaves with long petioles, possibly indicating a disruption in circadian-clock controlled processes or nyctinastic movements. Other transcription factor genes can be used to alter leaf shape in a significant manner from wild-type, some of which may find use in ornamental applications.
Leaf morphology: altered leaf size. Large leaves, such as those produced in plants overexpressing G268, G324, G438, G852, G1113, G1274, G1451, G2536, G2699, G2768, and G3008, generally increase plant biomass. This provides benefit for crops where the vegetative portion of the plant is the marketable portion.
Leaf morphology: light green and gray leaves. Transcription factor genes such as G351, G600, G651, G1468, G1718, G2565, G2604, G2779, G2859, G3044, and G3070 that provide an altered appearance may positively affect a plant's value to the ornamental horticulture industry.
Leaf morphology: glossy leaves. Transcription factor genes such as G30, G370 (when knocked-out), G975, G1792, G2640, G2649 and their equivalogs that induce the formation of glossy leaves generally do so by elevating levels of epidermal wax. Thus, the genes could be used to engineer changes in the composition and amount of leaf surface components, including waxes. The ability to manipulate wax composition, amount, or distribution could modify plant tolerance to drought and low humidity, or resistance to insects or pathogens. Additionally, wax may be a valuable commodity in some species, and altering its accumulation and/or composition could enhance yield.
Seed morphology: altered seed coloration. Presently disclosed transcription factor genes, including G581, G961, G2085, and G2371, have been used to modify seed color, which, along with the equivalogs of these genes, could provide added appeal to seeds or seed products.
Seed morphology: altered seed size and shape. The introduction of presently disclosed transcription factor genes, including G151, G581, G2085, G2585, or G2933, into plants that increase the size of seeds may have a significant impact on yield and appearance, particularly when the product is the seed itself (e.g., in the case of grains, legumes, nuts, etc.). Seed size, in addition to seed coat integrity, thickness and permeability, seed water content and a number of other components including antioxidants and oligosaccharides, also affects affect seed longevity in storage, with larger seeds often being more desirable for prolonged storage.
Transcription factor genes that alter seed shape, including G652, G916, G961 and their equivalogs may have both ornamental applications and improve or broaden the appeal of seed products.
Leaf and seed biochemistry. Overexpression of transcription factors genes, including G975 and its equivalogs, which results in increased leaf wax could be used to manipulate wax composition, amount, or distribution. These transcription factors can improve yield in those plants and crops from which wax is a valuable product. The genes may also be used to modify plant tolerance to drought and/or low humidity or resistance to insects, as well as plant appearance (glossy leaves). The effect of increased wax deposition on leaves of a plant like may improve water use efficiency. Manipulation of these genes may reduce the wax coating on sunflower seeds; this wax fouls the oil extraction system during sunflower seed processing for oil. For the latter purpose or any other where wax reduction is valuable, antisense or co-suppression of the transcription factor genes in a tissue-specific manner would be valuable.
Prenyl lipids play a role in anchoring proteins in membranes or membranous organelles. Thus modifying the prenyl lipid content of seeds and leaves could affect membrane integrity and function. One important group of prenyl lipids, the tocopherols, have both anti-oxidant and vitamin E activity. Transcription factor genes (e.g., a G652 knockout) have been shown to modify the prenyl lipid content of leaves in plants, and these genes and their equivalogs may thus be used to alter prenyl lipid content of leaves.
Overexpression of transcription factors have resulted in plants with altered leaf insoluble sugar content. These transcription factors and their equivalogs that alter plant cell wall composition have several potential applications including altering food digestibility, plant tensile strength, wood quality, pathogen resistance and in pulp production. In particular, hemicellulose is not desirable in paper pulps because of its lack of strength compared with cellulose. Thus modulating the amounts of cellulose vs. hemicellulose in the plant cell wall is desirable for the paper/lumber industry. Increasing the insoluble carbohydrate content in various fruits, vegetables, and other edible consumer products will result in enhanced fiber content. Increased fiber content would not only provide health benefits in food products, but might also increase digestibility of forage crops. In addition, the hemicellulose and pectin content of fruits and berries affects the quality of jam and catsup made from them. Changes in hemicellulose and pectin content could result in a superior consumer product.
A number of the presently disclosed transcription factor genes have been shown to alter the fatty acid composition in plants (e.g., G975), and seeds and leaves in particular. This modification suggests several utilities, including improving the nutritional value of seeds or whole plants. Dietary fatty acids ratios have been shown to have an effect on, for example, bone integrity and remodeling (see, for example, Weiler (2000) Pediatr. Res. 47:5692-697). The ratio of dietary fatty acids may alter the precursor pools of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids that serve as precursors for prostaglandin synthesis. In mammalian connective tissue, prostaglandins serve as important signals regulating the balance between resorption and formation in bone and cartilage. Thus dietary fatty acid ratios altered in seeds may affect the etiology and outcome of bone loss.
Transcription factors that reduce leaf fatty acids, for example, 16:3 fatty acids, may be used to control thylakoid membrane development, including proplastid to chloroplast development. The genes that encode these transcription factors might thus be useful for controlling the transition from proplastid to chromoplast in fruits and vegetables. It may also be desirable to change the expression of these genes to prevent cotyledon greening in Brassica napus or B. campestris to avoid green oil due to early frost.
Transcription factor genes that increase leaf fatty acid production, including G975 and its equivalogs could potentially be used to manipulate seed composition, which is very important for the nutritional value and production of various food products. A number of transcription factor genes are involved in mediating an aspect of the regulatory response to temperature. These genes may be used to alter the expression of desaturases that lead to production of 18:3 and 16:3 fatty acids, the balance of which affects membrane fluidity and mitigates damage to cell membranes and photosynthetic structures at high and low temperatures.
The G652 knockout line had a reproducible increase in the leaf glucosinolate M39480. It also showed a reproducible increase in seed alpha-tocopherol. A number of glucosinolates have been shown to have anti-cancer activity; thus, increasing the levels or composition of these compounds by modifying the expression of transcription factors (e.g., G652), can have a beneficial effect on human diet.
Glucosinolates are undesirable components of the oilseeds used in animal feed since they produce toxic effects. Low-glucosinolate varieties of canola, for example, have been developed to combat this problem. Glucosinolates form part of a plant's natural defense against insects. Modification of glucosinolate composition or quantity by introducing transcription factors that affect these characteristics can therefore afford increased protection from herbivores. Furthermore, in edible crops, tissue specific promoters can be used to ensure that these compounds accumulate specifically in tissues, such as the epidermis, which are not taken for consumption.
Presently disclosed transcription factor genes that modify levels of phytosterols in plants may have at least two utilities. First, phytosterols are an important source of precursors for the manufacture of human steroid hormones. Thus, regulation of transcription factor expression or activity could lead to elevated levels of important human steroid precursors for steroid semi-synthesis. For example, transcription factors that cause elevated levels of campesterol in leaves, or sitosterols and stigmasterols in seed crops, would be useful for this purpose. Phytosterols and their hydrogenated derivatives phytostanols also have proven cholesterol-lowering properties, and transcription factor genes that modify the expression of these compounds in plants would thus provide health benefits.
The composition of seeds, particularly with respect to seed oil amounts and/or composition, is very important for the nutritional and caloric value and production of various food and feed products. Modifying the expression of transcription factor genes that alter seed oil content could be used to improve the heat stability of oils or to improve the nutritional quality of seed oil, by, for example, reducing the number of calories in seed by decreasing oil or fatty acid content, OR increasing the number of calories in animal feeds by increasing fatty acid or seed oil content (e.g., by knocking out G961, G1451, or G2830).
As with seed oils, the composition of seeds, particularly with respect to protein amounts and/or composition, is very important for the nutritional value and production of various food and feed products. Transcription factor genes may be used to modify protein concentrations in seeds, which would modify the caloric content of seeds or provide nutritional benefits, and may be used to prolong storage, increase seed pest or disease resistance, or modify germination rates.
Prenyl lipids play a role in anchoring proteins in membranes or membranous organelles. Thus, presently disclosed transcription factor genes, including G652 and equivalogs, that modify the prenyl lipid content of seeds and leaves (in the case of G652, when this gene is knocked out) could affect membrane integrity and function. Transcription factor genes have been shown to modify the tocopherol composition of plants α-Tocopherol is better known as vitamin E. Tocopherols such as α- and γ-tocopherol both have anti-oxidant activity.
Light response/shade avoidance: altered cotyledon, hypocotyl, petiole development, altered leaf orientation, constitutive photomorphogenesis, photomorphogenesis in low light. Presently disclosed transcription factor genes, including G30; G246; G351, G353; G354; G478, G807, G916, G1013, G1082, G1510, G1988, G2432; G2650; G2694, G2754, G2771, G2859, G2884, G2993, G3032 and their equivalogs that can modify a plant's response to light may be useful for modifying plant growth or development, for example, photomorphogenesis in poor light, or accelerating flowering time in response to various light intensities, quality or duration to which a non-transformed plant would not similarly respond. Examples of such responses that have been demonstrated include leaf number and arrangement, and early flower bud appearances. Elimination of shading responses may lead to increased planting densities with subsequent yield enhancement. As these genes may also alter plant architecture, they may find use in the ornamental horticulture industry.
Pigment: Increased Anthocyanin Level in Various Plant Organs and Tissues.
G253, G386, G581, G707, G1482, G2453, G2456, G2459, G2604, G2718 and equivalogs can be used to alter anthocyanin levels in one or more tissues, depending on the organ in which these genes are expressed may be used to alter anthocyanin production in numerous plant species. Expression of presently disclosed transcription factor genes that increase flavonoid production in plants, including anthocyanins and condensed tannins, may be used to alter in pigment production for horticultural purposes, and possibly increasing stress resistance. A number of flavonoids have been shown to have antimicrobial activity and could be used to engineer pathogen resistance. Several flavonoid compounds have health promoting effects such as inhibition of tumor growth, prevention of bone loss and prevention of the oxidation of lipids. Increased levels of condensed tannins, in forage legumes would be an important agronomic trait because they prevent pasture bloat by collapsing protein foams within the rumen. For a review on the utilities of flavonoids and their derivatives, refer to Dixon et al. (1999) Trends Plant Sci. 4: 394-400.
Antisense and Co-suppression
In addition to expression of the nucleic acids of the invention as gene replacement or plant phenotype modification nucleic acids, the nucleic acids are also useful for sense and anti-sense suppression of expression, e.g. to down-regulate expression of a nucleic acid of the invention, e.g. as a further mechanism for modulating plant phenotype. That is, the nucleic acids of the invention, or subsequences or anti-sense sequences thereof, can be used to block expression of naturally occurring homologous nucleic acids. A variety of sense and anti-sense technologies are known in the art, e.g. as set forth in Lichtenstein and Nellen (1997) Antisense Technology: A Practical Approach IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K. Antisense regulation is also described in Crowley et al. (1985) Cell 43: 633-641; Rosenberg et al. (1985) Nature 313: 703-706; Preiss et al. (1985) Nature 313: 27-32; Melton (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 82: 144-148; Izant and Weintraub (1985) Science 229: 345-352; and Kim and Wold (1985) Cell 42: 129-138. Additional methods for antisense regulation are known in the art. Antisense regulation has been used to reduce or inhibit expression of plant genes in, for example in European Patent Publication No. 271988. Antisense RNA may be used to reduce gene expression to produce a visible or biochemical phenotypic change in a plant (Smith et al. (1988) Nature, 334: 724-726; Smith et al. (1990) Plant Mol. Biol. 14: 369-379). In general, sense or anti-sense sequences are introduced into a cell, where they are optionally amplified, e.g. by transcription. Such sequences include both simple oligonucleotide sequences and catalytic sequences such as ribozymes.
For example, a reduction or elimination of expression (i.e., a “knock-out”) of a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog polypeptide in a transgenic plant, e.g., to modify a plant trait, can be obtained by introducing an antisense construct corresponding to the polypeptide of interest as a cDNA. For antisense suppression, the transcription factor or homolog cDNA is arranged in reverse orientation (with respect to the coding sequence) relative to the promoter sequence in the expression vector. The introduced sequence need not be the full length cDNA or gene, and need not be identical to the cDNA or gene found in the plant type to be transformed. Typically, the antisense sequence need only be capable of hybridizing to the target gene or RNA of interest. Thus, where the introduced sequence is of shorter length, a higher degree of homology to the endogenous transcription factor sequence will be needed for effective antisense suppression. While antisense sequences of various lengths can be utilized, preferably, the introduced antisense sequence in the vector will be at least 30 nucleotides in length, and improved antisense suppression will typically be observed as the length of the antisense sequence increases. Preferably, the length of the antisense sequence in the vector will be greater than 100 nucleotides. Transcription of an antisense construct as described results in the production of RNA molecules that are the reverse complement of mRNA molecules transcribed from the endogenous transcription factor gene in the plant cell.
Suppression of endogenous transcription factor gene expression can also be achieved using RNA interference, or RNAi. RNAi is a post-transcriptional, targeted gene-silencing technique that uses double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to incite degradation of messenger RNA (mRNA) containing the same sequence as the dsRNA (Constans, (2002) The Scientist 16:36). Small interfering RNAs, or siRNAs are produced in at least two steps: an endogenous ribonuclease cleaves longer dsRNA into shorter, 21-23 nucleotide-long RNAs. The siRNA segments then mediate the degradation of the target mRNA (Zamore, (2001) Nature Struct. Biol., 8:746-50). RNAi has been used for gene function determination in a manner similar to antisense oligonucleotides (Constans, (2002) The Scientist 16:36). Expression vectors that continually express siRNAs in transiently and stably transfected have been engineered to express small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), which get processed in vivo into siRNAs-like molecules capable of carrying out gene-specific silencing (Brummelkamp et al., (2002) Science 296:550-553, and Paddison, et al. (2002) Genes & Dev. 16:948-958). Post-transcriptional gene silencing by double-stranded RNA is discussed in further detail by Hammond et al. (2001) Nature Rev Gen 2: 110-119, Fire et al. (1998) Nature 391: 806-811 and Timmons and Fire (1998) Nature 395: 854. Vectors in which RNA encoded by a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog cDNA is over-expressed can also be used to obtain co-suppression of a corresponding endogenous gene, e.g., in the manner described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,020 to Jorgensen. Such co-suppression (also termed sense suppression) does not require that the entire transcription factor cDNA be introduced into the plant cells, nor does it require that the introduced sequence be exactly identical to the endogenous transcription factor gene of interest. However, as with antisense suppression, the suppressive efficiency will be enhanced as specificity of hybridization is increased, e.g., as the introduced sequence is lengthened, and/or as the sequence similarity between the introduced sequence and the endogenous transcription factor gene is increased.
Vectors expressing an untranslatable form of the transcription factor mRNA, e.g., sequences comprising one or more stop codon, or nonsense mutation) can also be used to suppress expression of an endogenous transcription factor, thereby reducing or eliminating its activity and modifying one or more traits. Methods for producing such constructs are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,583,021. Preferably, such constructs are made by introducing a premature stop codon into the transcription factor gene. Alternatively, a plant trait can be modified by gene silencing using double-strand RNA (Sharp (1999) Genes and Development 13: 139-141). Another method for abolishing the expression of a gene is by insertion mutagenesis using the T-DNA of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. After generating the insertion mutants, the mutants can be screened to identify those containing the insertion in a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog gene. Plants containing a single transgene insertion event at the desired gene can be crossed to generate homozygous plants for the mutation. Such methods are well known to those of skill in the art (See for example Koncz et al. (1992) Methods in Arabidopsis Research, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., River Edge, N.J.).
Alternatively, a plant phenotype can be altered by eliminating an endogenous gene, such as a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog, e.g., by homologous recombination (Kempin et al. (1997) Nature 389: 802-803).
A plant trait can also be modified by using the Cre-lox system (for example, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,658,772). A plant genome can be modified to include first and second lox sites that are then contacted with a Cre recombinase. If the lox sites are in the same orientation, the intervening DNA sequence between the two sites is excised. If the lox sites are in the opposite orientation, the intervening sequence is inverted.
The polynucleotides and polypeptides of this invention can also be expressed in a plant in the absence of an expression cassette by manipulating the activity or expression level of the endogenous gene by other means, such as, for example, by ectopically expressing a gene by T-DNA activation tagging (Ichikawa et al. (1997) Nature 390 698-701; Kakimoto et al. (1996) Science 274: 982-985). This method entails transforming a plant with a gene tag containing multiple transcriptional enhancers and once the tag has inserted into the genome, expression of a flanking gene coding sequence becomes deregulated. In another example, the transcriptional machinery in a plant can be modified so as to increase transcription levels of a polynucleotide of the invention (See, e.g., PCT Publications WO 96/06166 and WO 98/53057 which describe the modification of the DNA-binding specificity of zinc finger proteins by changing particular amino acids in the DNA-binding motif).
The transgenic plant can also include the machinery necessary for expressing or altering the activity of a polypeptide encoded by an endogenous gene, for example, by altering the phosphorylation state of the polypeptide to maintain it in an activated state.
Transgenic plants (or plant cells, or plant explants, or plant tissues) incorporating the polynucleotides of the invention and/or expressing the polypeptides of the invention can be produced by a variety of well established techniques as described above. Following construction of a vector, most typically an expression cassette, including a polynucleotide, e.g., encoding a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog, of the invention, standard techniques can be used to introduce the polynucleotide into a plant, a plant cell, a plant explant or a plant tissue of interest. Optionally, the plant cell, explant or tissue can be regenerated to produce a transgenic plant.
The plant can be any higher plant, including gymnosperms, monocotyledonous and dicotyledenous plants. Suitable protocols are available for Leguminosae (alfalfa, soybean, clover, etc.), Umbelliferae (carrot, celery, parsnip), Cruciferae (cabbage, radish, rapeseed, broccoli, etc.), Curcurbitaceae (melons and cucumber), Gramineae (wheat, corn, rice, barley, millet, etc.), Solanaceae (potato, tomato, tobacco, peppers, etc.), and various other crops. See protocols described in Ammirato et al., eds., (1984) Handbook of Plant Cell Culture—Crop Species, Macmillan Publ. Co., New York, N.Y.; Shiinamoto et al. (1989) Nature 338: 274-276; Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 833-839; and Vasil et al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 429-434.
Transformation and regeneration of both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cells is now routine, and the selection of the most appropriate transformation technique will be determined by the practitioner. The choice of method will vary with the type of plant to be transformed; those skilled in the art will recognize the suitability of particular methods for given plant types. Suitable methods can include, but are not limited to: electroporation of plant protoplasts; liposome-mediated transformation; polyethylene glycol (PEG) mediated transformation; transformation using viruses; micro-injection of plant cells; micro-projectile bombardment of plant cells; vacuum infiltration; and Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation. Transformation means introducing a nucleotide sequence into a plant in a manner to cause stable or transient expression of the sequence.
Successful examples of the modification of plant characteristics by transformation with cloned sequences which serve to illustrate the current knowledge in this field of technology, and which are herein incorporated by reference, include: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,571,706; 5,677,175; 5,510,471; 5,750,386; 5,597,945; 5,589,615; 5,750,871; 5,268,526; 5,780,708; 5,538,880; 5,773,269; 5,736,369 and 5,610,042.
Following transformation, plants are preferably selected using a dominant selectable marker incorporated into the transformation vector. Typically, such a marker will confer antibiotic or herbicide resistance on the transformed plants, and selection of transformants can be accomplished by exposing the plants to appropriate concentrations of the antibiotic or herbicide.
After transformed plants are selected and grown to maturity, those plants showing a modified trait are identified. The modified trait can be any of those traits described above. Additionally, to confirm that the modified trait is due to changes in expression levels or activity of the polypeptide or polynucleotide of the invention can be determined by analyzing mRNA expression using Northern blots, RT-PCR or microarrays, or protein expression using immunoblots or Western blots or gel shift assays.
Integrated Systems—Sequence Identity
Additionally, the present invention may be an integrated system, computer or computer readable medium that comprises an instruction set for determining the identity of one or more sequences in a database. In addition, the instruction set can be used to generate or identify sequences that meet any specified criteria. Furthermore, the instruction set may be used to associate or link certain functional benefits, such improved characteristics, with one or more identified sequence.
For example, the instruction set can include, e.g., a sequence comparison or other alignment program, e.g., an available program such as, for example, the Wisconsin Package Version 10.0, such as BLAST, FASTA, PILEUP, FINDPATTERNS or the like (GCG, Madison, Wis.). Public sequence databases such as GenBank, EMBL, Swiss-Prot and PIR or private sequence databases such as PHYTOSEQ sequence database (Incyte Genomics, Palo Alto, Calif.) can be searched.
Alignment of sequences for comparison can be conducted by the local homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman (1981) Adv. Appl. Math. 2: 482-489, by the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch (1970) J. Mol. Biol. 48: 443-453, by the search for similarity method of Pearson and Lipman (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85: 2444-2448, by computerized implementations of these algorithms. After alignment, sequence comparisons between two (or more) polynucleotides or polypeptides are typically performed by comparing sequences of the two sequences over a comparison window to identify and compare local regions of sequence similarity. The comparison window can be a segment of at least about 20 contiguous positions, usually about 50 to about 200, more usually about 100 to about 150 contiguous positions. A description of the method is provided in Ausubel et al. supra.
A variety of methods for determining sequence relationships can be used, including manual alignment and computer assisted sequence alignment and analysis. This later approach is a preferred approach in the present invention, due to the increased throughput afforded by computer assisted methods. As noted above, a variety of computer programs for performing sequence alignment are available, or can be produced by one of skill.
One example algorithm that is suitable for determining percent sequence identity and sequence similarity is the BLAST algorithm, which is described in Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410. Software for performing BLAST analyses is publicly available, e.g., through the National Library of Medicine's National Center for Biotechnology Information (ncbi.nlm.nih; see at world wide web (www) National Institutes of Health U.S. goverment (gov) website). This algorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs (HSPs) by identifying short words of length W in the query sequence, which either match or satisfy some positive-valued threshold score T when aligned with a word of the same length in a database sequence. T is referred to as the neighborhood word score threshold (Altschul et al. supra). These initial neighborhood word hits act as seeds for initiating searches to find longer HSPs containing them. The word hits are then extended in both directions along each sequence for as far as the cumulative alignment score can be increased. Cumulative scores are calculated using, for nucleotide sequences, the parameters M (reward score for a pair of matching residues; always >0) and N (penalty score for mismatching residues; always <0). For amino acid sequences, a scoring matrix is used to calculate the cumulative score. Extension of the word hits in each direction are halted when: the cumulative alignment score falls off by the quantity X from its maximum achieved value; the cumulative score goes to zero or below, due to the accumulation of one or more negative-scoring residue alignments; or the end of either sequence is reached. The BLAST algorithm parameters W, T, and X determine the sensitivity and speed of the alignment. The BLASTN program (for nucleotide sequences) uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 11, an expectation (E) of 10, a cutoff of 100, M=5, N=−4, and a comparison of both strands. For amino acid sequences, the BLASTP program uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (see Henikoff and Henikoff (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 89: 10915-10919). Unless otherwise indicated, “sequence identity” here refers to the % sequence identity generated from a tblastx using the NCBI version of the algorithm at the default settings using gapped alignments with the filter “off” (see, for example, NIH NLM NCBI website at ncbi.nlm.nih, supra).
In addition to calculating percent sequence identity, the BLAST algorithm also performs a statistical analysis of the similarity between two sequences (see, e.g. Karlin and Altschul (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90: 5873-5787). One measure of similarity provided by the BLAST algorithm is the smallest sum probability (P(N)), which provides an indication of the probability by which a match between two nucleotide or amino acid sequences would occur by chance. For example, a nucleic acid is considered similar to a reference sequence (and, therefore, in this context, homologous) if the smallest sum probability in a comparison of the test nucleic acid to the reference nucleic acid is less than about 0.1, or less than about 0.01, and or even less than about 0.001. An additional example of a useful sequence alignment algorithm is PILEUP. PILEUP creates a multiple sequence alignment from a group of related sequences using progressive, pairwise alignments. The program can align, e.g., up to 300 sequences of a maximum length of 5,000 letters.
The integrated system, or computer typically includes a user input interface allowing a user to selectively view one or more sequence records corresponding to the one or more character strings, as well as an instruction set which aligns the one or more character strings with each other or with an additional character string to identify one or more region of sequence similarity. The system may include a link of one or more character strings with a particular phenotype or gene function. Typically, the system includes a user readable output element that displays an alignment produced by the alignment instruction set.
The methods of this invention can be implemented in a localized or distributed computing environment. In a distributed environment, the methods may implemented on a single computer comprising multiple processors or on a multiplicity of computers. The computers can be linked, e.g. through a common bus, but more preferably the computer(s) are nodes on a network. The network can be a generalized or a dedicated local or wide-area network and, in certain preferred embodiments, the computers may be components of an intra-net or an internet.
Thus, the invention provides methods for identifying a sequence similar or homologous to one or more polynucleotides as noted herein, or one or more target polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotides, or otherwise noted herein and may include linking or associating a given plant phenotype or gene function with a sequence. In the methods, a sequence database is provided (locally or across an inter or intra net) and a query is made against the sequence database using the relevant sequences herein and associated plant phenotypes or gene functions.
Any sequence herein can be entered into the database, before or after querying the database. This provides for both expansion of the database and, if done before the querying step, for insertion of control sequences into the database. The control sequences can be detected by the query to ensure the general integrity of both the database and the query. As noted, the query can be performed using a web browser based interface. For example, the database can be a centralized public database such as those noted herein, and the querying can be done from a remote terminal or computer across an internet or intranet.
Any sequence herein can be used to identify a similar, homologous, paralogous, or orthologous sequence in another plant. This provides means for identifying endogenous sequences in other plants that may be useful to alter a trait of progeny plants, which results from crossing two plants of different strain. For example, sequences that encode an ortholog of any of the sequences herein that naturally occur in a plant with a desired trait can be identified using the sequences disclosed herein. The plant is then crossed with a second plant of the same species but which does not have the desired trait to produce progeny which can then be used in further crossing experiments to produce the desired trait in the second plant. Therefore the resulting progeny plant contains no transgenes; expression of the endogenous sequence may also be regulated by treatment with a particular chemical or other means, such as EMR. Some examples of such compounds well known in the art include: ethylene; cytokinins; phenolic compounds, which stimulate the transcription of the genes needed for infection; specific monosaccharides and acidic environments which potentiate vir gene induction; acidic polysaccharides which induce one or more chromosomal genes; and opines; other mechanisms include light or dark treatment (for a review of examples of such treatments, see, Winans (1992) Microbiol. Rev. 56: 12-31; Eyal et al. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 19: 589-599; Chrispeels et al. (2000) Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 279-290; Piazza et al. (2002) Plant Physiol. 128: 1077-1086).
Table 7 lists sequences discovered to be orthologous to a number of representative transcription factors of the present invention. The column headings include the transcription factors listed by (a) the SEQ ID NO: of the Arabidopsis sequence that was used to discover the non-Arabidopsis orthologous sequence; (b) the GID sequence identifier of the Arabidopsis sequence; (c) the Sequence Identifier or GenBank Accession Number of the orthologous sequence;(d) the species from which the orthologous sequence is derived; (e) the SEQ ID NO: of the non-Arabidopsis orthologous sequence, and (e) the smallest sum probability pairwise comparison of each orthologous sequence to the similar Arabidopsis sequence determined by BLAST analysis. 







Lengthy table referenced here




US07825296-20101102-T00001


Please refer to the end of the specification for access instructions.






Table 8 lists sequences discovered to be paralogous to a number of transcription factors of the present invention. The columns headings include, from left to right, the Arabidopsis SEQ ID NO; corresponding Arabidopsis Gene ID (GID) numbers; the GID numbers of the paralogs discovered in a database search; and the SEQ ID NOs assigned to the paralogs.







TABLE 8







Arabidopsis Transcription Factor Genes and Paralogs










Arabidopsis

Paralog
Paralog


Transcription Factor
Arabidopsis
GID
Nucleotide SEQ


SEQ ID NO:
TF GID No
No.
ID NO:













3
G12
G1379
1441




G24
1349


7
G30
G1791
1461




G1792
1463




G1795
1465


9
G46
G1004
1425




G1419
1447




G29
1351




G43
1355


11
G47
G2133
1495


39
G148
G142
33


43
G153
G152
1365




G1760
1459




G860
1419


45
G155
G131
15




G135
21


79
G355
G1994
1491


83
G370
G1995
1493




G2826
1531




G2838
1535




G361
1383




G362
1385


97
G438
G1548
1453




G390
1389




G391
1391




G392
1393


105
G485
G1364
1439




G2345
1501




G481
1395




G482
1397


121
G627
G149
1363


125
G651
G1914
1481




G1973
1485


127
G652
G1335
1435


141
G807
G810
1417


145
G839
G1196
1429


153
G916
G184
1369




G186
1371


155
G926
G2632
1517


159
G961
G2535
1507




G957
157


161
G975
G1387
1443




G2583
1515


163
G1011
G154
1367


171
G1037
G722
1409


181
G1128
G1399
1445


185
G1142
G2659
1521


189
G1206
G1207
1431


199
G1313
G1325
1433


207
G1357
G1452
1451




G512
1401


215
G1412
G759
1413




G773
1415


223
G1451
G990
1423


225
G1452
G1357
1437




G512
1401


233
G1482
G1888
1477


277
G1792
G1791
1461




G1795
1465




G30
7


281
G1797
G1798
283


283
G1798
G1797
281


287
G1816
G225
1375




G226
1377




G2718
507




G682
1407


297
G1840
G1749
1457




G1839
1473


303
G1863
G2334
1499


305
G1893
G1976
1489




G3062
1555


311
G1928
G2664
1523


333
G1995
G2826
1531




G2838
555




G361
1383




G362
1385




G370
1387


341
G2041
G2882
1537


371
G2207
G2199
1497


393
G2334
G1863
303


407
G2432
G736
1411


417
G2457
G2459
1505


419
G2459
G2457
417


425
G2505
G2635
1519


431
G2536
G511
1399


435
G2550
G2546
1509


441
G2567
G1017
167


483
G2650
G617
1405


505
G2717
G204
1373




G2709
1525


507
G2718
G1816
287




G225
1375




G226
1377




G682
1407


511
G2741
G1435
1449


525
G2768
G600
117


529
G2776
G1652
1455


545
G2826
G1995
333




G2838
555




G361
1383




G362
1385




G370
1387


547
G2830
G2562
1511




G2563
1513




G2828
1533


555
G2838
G1995
333




G2826
545




G361
1383




G362
1385




G370
1387


557
G2839
G1889
1479




G1974
1487




G353
1379




G354
1381


567
G2854
G1940
1483


569
G2859
G2779
533


571
G2865
G2934
595


593
G2933
G2928
1539




G2932
1541


607
G2979
G2980
1547


609
G2981
G2982
1551


611
G2982
G2981
1549


615
G2990
G2989
1553


651
G3067
G2966
1545









Table 9 lists the gene identification number (GID) and relationships for homologous (found using analyses according to Example IX) and variant sequences for the sequences of the Sequence Listing.







TABLE 9







Similarity relationships found within the Sequence Listing













DNA or




SEQ ID

Protein
Species from which


NO:
GID
(PRT)
Sequence is Derived
Relationship














671

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


672

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


673

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


674

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


675

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


676

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


677

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


678

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


679

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


680

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


681

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G12


682

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G12


683

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G12


684

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


685

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G30,






G1792


686

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G30,






G1792


687

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G30,






G1792


688

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G30,






G1792


689

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G30,






G1792


690

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G30, G1792


691

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G30,






G1792


692

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G46


693

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G46


694

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G46


695

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G46


696

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G46


697

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G46


698

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G46


699

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G46


700

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G46


701

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G46


702

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G47


703

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G47


704

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


705

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


706

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


707

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G148


708

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


709

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


710

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


711

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


712

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


713

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153


714

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153


715

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G153


716

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153


717

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153


718

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153


719

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


720

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


721

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


722

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


723

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


724

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


725

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


726

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


727

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


728

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


729

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G155


730

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G155


731

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G155


732

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


733

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


734

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


735

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


736

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


737

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


738

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


739

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


740

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


741

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


742

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


743

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G200


744

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


745

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


746

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


747

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G355


748

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G355


749

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G355


750

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G355


751

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G355


752

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G355


753

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370,






G1995, G2826, G2838


754

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370,






G1995, G2826, G2838


755

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370,






G1995, G2826, G2838


756

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370,






G1995, G2826, G2838


757

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370,






G1995, G2826, G2838


758

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370,






G2826


759

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370,






G1995, G2826, G2838


760

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G370, G1995, G2826, G2838


761

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G370, G1995, G2826, G2838


762

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G370, G1995, G2826, G2838


763

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G370, G1995, G2826, G2838


764

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370,






G1995, G2826, G2838


765

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370,






G1995, G2826, G2838


766

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G372


767

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G372


768

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


769

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


770

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


771

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


772

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


773

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


774

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


775

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


776

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


777

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


778

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


779

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


780

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


781

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


782

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G438


783

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G438


784

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G438


785

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G438


786

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


787

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


788

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


789

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


790

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


791

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


792

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


793

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


794

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


795

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


796

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


797

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


798

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


799

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


800

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


801

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


802

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


803

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


804

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


805

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


806

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


807

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G485


808

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G485


809

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G485


810

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G485


811

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G485


812

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


813

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


814

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


815

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


816

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


817

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


818

DNA
Zea inays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


819

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


820

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


821

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


822

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G627


823

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G627


824

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G627


825

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G651


826

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G651


827

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G651


828

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G651


829

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G651


830

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G651


831

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G651


832

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G651


833

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G651


834

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G651


835

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


836

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


837

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


838

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


839

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


840

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


841

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


842

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


843

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


844

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


845

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G652


846

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G652


847

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G652


848

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G652


849

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G652


850

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G652


851

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G652


852

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G652


853

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


854

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


855

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


856

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


857

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


858

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


859

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


860

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


861

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807


862

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807


863

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807


864

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807


865

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G807


866

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807


867

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807


868

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


869

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


870

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


871

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


872

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G839


873

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G839


874

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


875

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


876

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


877

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


878

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


879

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


880

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


881

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


882

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


883

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


884

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


885

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G916


886

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G916


887

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G916


888

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


889

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G926


890

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G926


891

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G926


892

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G926


893

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G926


894

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G926


895

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G961


896

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G961


897

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G961


898

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G961


899

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G961


900

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G961


901

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G961


902

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


903

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


904

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


905

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


906

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


907

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


908

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G975


909

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


910

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


911

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


912

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


913

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


914

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


915

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


916

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


917

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


918

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


919

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1011


920

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


921

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


922

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


923

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


924

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


925

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1013


926

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


927

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


928

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


929

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


930

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


931

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


932

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1037


933

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1037


934

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1037


935

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1037


936

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1037


937

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1037


938

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


939

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


940

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


941

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


942

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1128


943

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1128


944

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1142


945

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1142


946

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1142


947

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1142


948

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


949

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


950

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


951

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


952

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


953

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


954

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


955

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


956

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1206


957

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1206


958

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1206


959

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1206


960

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


961

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


962

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


963

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


964

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


965

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


966

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


967

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


968

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1274


969

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1274


970

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1274


971

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1274


972

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1274


973

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1274


974

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1274


975

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1274


976

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1313


977

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1313


978

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1313


979

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1313


980

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1313


981

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1313


982

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1357,






G1452


983

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1412


984

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1412


985

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1412


986

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1412


987

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1412


988

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1412


989

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1412


990

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1412


991

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1412


992

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1420


993

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1420


994

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1420


995

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1420


996

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


997

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


998

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


999

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1000

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1001

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1451


1002

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1451


1003

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1451


1004

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1451


1005

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1006

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1007

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1008

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1009

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1010

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1468


1011

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1468


1012

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1468


1013

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1476


1014

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1015

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1016

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1017

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1018

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1019

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1020

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1021

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1022

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1023

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1482


1024

PRT
Oryza sariva
Orthologous to G1482


1025

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1026

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1027

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1028

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1029

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1030

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1031

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1510


1032

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1510


1033

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1539


1034

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1539


1035

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1557


1036

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


1037

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


1038

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


1039

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


1040

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1660


1041

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1660


1042

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1660


1043

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


1044

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


1045

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


1046

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


1047

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


1048

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1730


1049

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1753


1050

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1753


1051

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1779


1052

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1779


1053

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1779


1054

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1779


1055

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1779


1056

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1796


1057

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1816,






G2718


1058

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1816,






G2718


1059

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1816,






G2718


1060

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1816,






G2718


1061

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1816,






G2718


1062

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1816


1063

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1816,






G2718


1064

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1816, G2718


1065

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1816, G2718


1066

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1816,






G2718


1067

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1816,






G2718


1068

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1893


1069

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1893


1070

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1893


1071

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1893


1072

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1893


1073

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1893


1074

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1893


1075

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1893


1076

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1893


1077

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1893


1078

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1893


1079

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1893


1080

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1893


1081

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1893


1082

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


1083

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


1084

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


1085

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


1086

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1928


1087

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1928


1088

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


1089

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


1090

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1968


1091

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1968


1092

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1968


1093

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1968


1094

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1095

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1096

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1097

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1985


1098

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988


1099

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988


1100

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988


1101

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988


1102

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988


1103

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988


1104

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988


1105

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2041


1106

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2041


1107

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2041


1108

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2085


1109

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2085


1110

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2085


1111

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2085


1112

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2085


1113

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2085


1114

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2109


1115

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2109


1116

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1117

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1118

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1119

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1120

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1121

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1122

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1123

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1124

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1125

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2239


1126

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2239


1127

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2239


1128

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2239


1129

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2239


1130

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2239


1131

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2239


1132

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2239


1133

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2239


1134

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2239


1135

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2239


1136

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2239


1137

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2317


1138

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2317


1139

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2319


1140

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2319


1141

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2319


1142

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2319


1143

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2432


1144

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2432


1145

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2432


1146

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2453


1147

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2457,






G2459


1148

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2457,






G2459


1149

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2457,






G2459


1150

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2457, G2459


1151

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2457, G2459


1152

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2457, G2459


1153

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2457,






G2459


1154

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2457


1155

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2457


1156

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2457


1157

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2457


1158

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2459


1159

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2459


1160

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2459


1161

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2505


1162

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2505


1163

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2536


1164

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2536


1165

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2536


1166

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2536


1167

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2536


1168

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2536


1169

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2536


1170

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2536


1171

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2536


1172

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2536


1173

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2550


1174

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2550


1175

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2550


1176

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1177

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1178

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1179

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1180

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1181

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1182

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1183

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1184

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2567


1185

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2567


1186

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2567


1187

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1188

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1189

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1190

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1191

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1192

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2571


1193

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2571


1194

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2571


1195

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2579


1196

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2579


1197

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2585


1198

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2585


1199

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2585


1200

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2617


1201

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2650


1202

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2650


1203

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2650


1204

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2650


1205

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2650


1206

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2650


1207

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2650


1208

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2661


1209

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1210

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1211

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1212

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1213

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1214

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1215

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1216

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1217

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1218

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1219

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2717


1220

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2717


1221

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2717


1222

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1223

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1224

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1225

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1226

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1227

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1228

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2723


1229

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2741


1230

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2741


1231

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2741


1232

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2741


1233

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2741


1234

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2741


1235

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2741


1236

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2741


1237

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2754


1238

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2754


1239

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2754


1240

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2754


1241

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2754


1242

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2754


1243

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2754


1244

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1245

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1246

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1247

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1248

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1249

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1250

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1251

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1252

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2768


1253

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2768


1254

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2768


1255

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1256

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1257

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1258

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1259

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1260

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1261

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1262

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1263

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1264

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1265

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1266

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1267

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1268

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1269

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1270

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1271

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1272

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2776


1273

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2776


1274

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2776


1275

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2776


1276

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2776


1277

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1278

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1279

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2826, G2838


1280

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2830


1281

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1282

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1283

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1284

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1285

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1286

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1287

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2839


1288

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2839


1289

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2839


1290

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2839


1291

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2839


1292

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2839


1293

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1294

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1295

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1296

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1297

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1298

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1299

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1300

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


1301

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2854


1302

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


1303

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2859


1304

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2865


1305

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2865


1306

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2885


1307

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2907


1308

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2907


1309

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2907


1310

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2907


1311

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2907


1312

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2913


1313

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2913


1314

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2933


1315

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2933


1316

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2933


1317

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2969


1318

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981,






G2982


1319

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981,






G2982


1320

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981,






G2982


1321

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981,






G2982


1322

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981,






G2982


1323

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981,






G2982


1324

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981


1325

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981,






G2982


1326

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981,






G2982


1327

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981,






G2982


1328

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2983


1329

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2983


1330

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2983


1331

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2983


1332

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2983


1333

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2983


1334

PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2990


1335

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2990


1336

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2990


1337

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3055


1338

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3055


1339

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3055


1340

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3055


1341

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3055


1342

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3055


1343

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3055


1344

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3055


1345

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3055


1346

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3083


1347

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3086


1348

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3086


1349
G24
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G12


1350
G24
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G12


1351
G29
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G46


1352
G29
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G46


1353
G30
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1792


1354
G30
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1792


1355
G43
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G46


1356
G43
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G46


1357
G131
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G155


1358
G131
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G155


1359
G135
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G155


1360
G135
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G155


1361
G142
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G148


1362
G142
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G148


1363
G149
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G627


1364
G149
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G627


1365
G152
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G153


1366
G152
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G153


1367
G154
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1011


1368
G154
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1011


1369
G184
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G916


1370
G184
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G916


1371
G186
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G916


1372
G186
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G916


1373
G204
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2717


1374
G204
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2717


1375
G225
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1816,






G2718


1376
G225
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1816, G2718


1377
G226
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1816,






G2718


1378
G226
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1816, G2718


1379
G353
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2839


1380
G353
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2839


1381
G354
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2839


1382
G354
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2839


1383
G361
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G370,






G1995, G2826, G2838


1384
G361
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G370, G1995, G2826, G2838


1385
G362
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G370,






G1995, G2826, G2838


1386
G362
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G370, G1995, G2826, G2838


1387
G370
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1995,






G2826, G2838


1388
G370
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1995, G2826, G2838


1389
G390
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G438


1390
G390
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G438


1391
G391
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G438


1392
G391
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G438


1393
G392
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G438


1394
G392
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G438


1395
G481
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G485


1396
G481
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G485


1397
G482
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G485


1398
G482
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G485


1399
G511
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2536


1400
G511
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2536


1401
GS12
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1357,






G1452


1402
G512
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1357, G1452


1403
G600
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2768


1404
G600
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2768


1405
G617
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2650


1406
G617
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2650


1407
G682
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1816,






G2718


1408
G682
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1816, G2718


1409
G722
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1037


1410
G722
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1037


1411
G736
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2432


1412
G736
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2432


1413
G759
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1412


1414
G759
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1412


1415
G773
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1412


1416
G773
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1412


1417
G810
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G807


1418
G810
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G807


1419
G860
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G153


1420
G860
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G153


1421
G957
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G961


1422
G957
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G961


1423
G990
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1451


1424
G990
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1451


1425
G1004
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G46


1426
G1004
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G46


1427
G1017
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2567


1428
G1017
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2567


1429
G1196
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G839


1430
G1196
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G839


1431
G1207
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1206


1432
G1207
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1206


1433
G1325
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1313


1434
G1325
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1313


1435
G1335
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G652


1436
G1335
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G652


1437
G1357
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1452


1438
G1357
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1452


1439
G1364
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G485


1440
G1364
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G485


1441
G1379
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G12


1442
G1379
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G12


1443
G1387
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G975


1444
G1387
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G975


1445
G1399
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1128


1446
G1399
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1128


1447
G1419
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G46


1448
G1419
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G46


1449
G1435
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2741


1450
G1435
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2741


1451
G1452
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1357


1452
G1452
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1357


1453
G1548
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G438


1454
G1548
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G438


1455
G1652
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2776


1456
G1652
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2776


1457
G1749
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1840


1458
G1749
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1840


1459
G1760
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G153


1460
G1760
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G153


1461
G1791
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G30,






G1792


1462
G1791
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G30, G1792


1463
G1792
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G30


1464
G1792
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G30


1465
G1795
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G30,






G1792


1466
G1795
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G30, G1792


1467
G1797
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1798


1468
G1797
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1798


1469
G1798
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1797


1470
G1798
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1797


1471
G1816
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2718


1472
G1816
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2718


1473
G1839
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1840


1474
G1839
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1840


1475
G1863
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2334


1476
G1863
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2334


1477
G1888
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1482


1478
G1888
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1482


1479
G1889
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2839


1480
G1889
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2839


1481
G1914
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G651


1482
G1914
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G651


1483
G1940
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2854


1484
G1940
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2854


1485
G1973
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G651


1486
G1973
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G651


1487
G1974
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2839


1488
G1974
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2839


1489
G1976
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1893


1490
G1976
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1893


1491
G1994
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G355


1492
G1994
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G355


1493
G1995
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G370,






G2826, G2838


1494
G1995
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G370, G2826, G2838


1495
G2133
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G47


1496
G2133
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G47


1497
G2199
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2207


1498
G2199
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2207


1499
G2334
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1863


1500
G2334
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1863


1501
G2345
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G485


1502
G2345
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G485


1503
G2457
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2459


1504
G2457
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2459


1505
G2459
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2457


1506
G2459
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2457


1507
G2535
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G961


1508
G2535
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G961


1509
G2546
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2550


1510
G2546
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2550


1511
G2562
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2830


1512
G2562
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2830


1513
G2563
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2830


1514
G2563
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2830


1515
G2583
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G975


1516
G2583
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G975


1517
G2632
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G926


1518
G2632
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G926


1519
G2635
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2505


1520
G2635
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2505


1521
G2659
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1142


1522
G2659
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1142


1523
G2664
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1928


1524
G2664
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1928


1525
G2709
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2717


1526
G2709
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2717


1527
G2718
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1816


1528
G2718
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1816


1529
G2779
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2859


1530
G2779
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2859


1531
G2826
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G370,






G1995, G2838


1532
G2826
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G370, G1995, G2838


1533
G2828
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2830


1534
G2828
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2830


1535
G2838
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G370,






G1995, G2826


1536
G2838
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G370, G1995, G2826


1537
G2882
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2041


1538
G2882
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2041


1539
G2928
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2933


1540
G2928
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2933


1541
G2932
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2933


1542
G2932
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2933


1543
G2934
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2865


1544
G2934
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2865


1545
G2966
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G3067


1546
G2966
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G3067


1547
G2980
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2979


1548
G2980
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2979


1549
G2981
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2982


1550
G2981
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2982


1551
G2982
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2981


1552
G2982
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2981


1553
G2989
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G2990


1554
G2989
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G2990


1555
G3062
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Predicted polypeptide sequence is paralogous to G1893


1556
G3062
PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana
Paralogous to G1893


1557

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


1558

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


1559

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G30


1560

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


1561

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


1562

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


1563

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1564

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1565

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1566

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1567

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


1568

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G319


1569

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G355


1570

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370


1571

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1572

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1573

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1574

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1575

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G627


1576

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G651


1577

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1578

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1579

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1580

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807


1581

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


1582

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1313


1583

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1313


1584

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1585

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1586

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1587

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1588

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1589

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1590

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1591

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1592

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1593

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


1594

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1796


1595

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1596

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1597

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1598

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1599

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1600

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1601

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988


1602

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2060


1603

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2109


1604

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2109


1605

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2207


1606

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2207


1607

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2317


1608

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2432


1609

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2453


1610

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2550


1611

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1612

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1613

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2650


1614

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1615

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2754


1616

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2826


1617

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1618

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


1619

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


1620

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2907


1621

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2907


1622

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2907


1623

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2913


1624

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2933


1625

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2969


1626

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981


1627

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2983


1628

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2990


1629

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2992


1630

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3076


1631

DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3083


1632

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


1633

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G30,






G1792


1634

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153


1635

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1636

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G355


1637

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370


1638

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1639

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1640

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1641

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


1642

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G624


1643

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1644

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1645

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1646

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


1647

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


1648

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


1649

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


1650

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G961


1651

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


1652

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


1653

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1128


1654

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


1655

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


1656

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


1657

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1412


1658

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1659

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1660

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1661

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1662

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1510


1663

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1816,






G2718


1664

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1893


1665

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


1666

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1667

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2207


1668

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2317


1669

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1670

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1671

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2741


1672

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1673

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1674

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2784


1675

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1676

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1677

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


1678

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2865


1679

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2907


1680

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2969


1681

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2969


1682

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2969


1683

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981


1684

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2983


1685

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2990


1686

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3055


1687

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3083


1688

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3086


1689

DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3086


1690

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


1691

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


1692

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G355


1693

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1694

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1695

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G627


1696

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


1697

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


1698

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


1699

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1276


1700

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1701

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1702

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1703

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1704

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


1705

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2051


1706

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2060


1707

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2085


1708

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1709

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2317


1710

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2382


1711

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2550


1712

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2550


1713

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1714

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2983


1715

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2990


1716

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3067


1717

DNA
Medicago truncatula
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3067


1718

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G47


1719

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1720

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1721

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1722

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1723

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1724

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1725

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


1726

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


1727

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G627


1728

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1729

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1730

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1731

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807


1732

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


1733

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


1734

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1313


1735

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1736

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1737

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1738

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1739

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


1740

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2051


1741

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2317


1742

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2457


1743

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1744

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1745

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2741


1746

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2754


1747

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2763


1748

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1749

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1750

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


1751

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


1752

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2907


1753

DNA
Hordeum vulgare
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3083


1754

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G30,






G1792


1755

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


1756

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


1757

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153


1758

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153


1759

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1760

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1761

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1762

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1763

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1764

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1765

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


1766

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


1767

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


1768

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


1769

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


1770

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G319


1771

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1772

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1773

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1774

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1775

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1776

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


1777

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


1778

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


1779

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G651


1780

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G651


1781

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G651


1782

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1783

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807


1784

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


1785

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


1786

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


1787

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


1788

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


1789

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


1790

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1142


1791

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


1792

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1793

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1794

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1795

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1796

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1797

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1798

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1799

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1800

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1801

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1802

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1803

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


1804

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


1805

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1796


1806

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1893


1807

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1808

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1809

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1810

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2041


1811

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2109


1812

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1813

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2453


1814

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2457


1815

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2550


1816

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1817

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2579


1818

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1819

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2741


1820

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2754


1821

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2754


1822

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2754


1823

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


1824

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


1825

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2907


1826

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2907


1827

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2930


1828

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2933


1829

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981


1830

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981


1831

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2992


1832

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3055


1833

DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3067


1834

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G30


1835

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


1836

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1837

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1838

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1839

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G319


1840

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1841

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1842

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1843

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1844

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1845

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1846

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


1847

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


1848

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


1849

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


1850

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G627


1851

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1852

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1853

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1854

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1855

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1856

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


1857

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G926


1858

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


1859

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


1860

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


1861

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


1862

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


1863

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1128


1864

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1865

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1866

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1867

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1868

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1869

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1870

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1871

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1872

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1873

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1874

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1875

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1876

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1877

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1878

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


1879

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


1880

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1510


1881

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


1882

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1796


1883

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1816,






G2718


1884

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1840


1885

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1886

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1887

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1888

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1889

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1890

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1891

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1892

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1893

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1894

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1895

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1896

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


1897

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2060


1898

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2109


1899

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1900

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1901

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


1902

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2382


1903

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2457,






G2459


1904

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2457


1905

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2550


1906

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


1907

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1908

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1909

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


1910

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2754


1911

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2754


1912

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


1913

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


1914

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1915

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1916

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1917

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


1918

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


1919

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


1920

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


1921

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2990


1922

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3055


1923

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3070


1924

DNA
Triticum aestivum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3083


1925

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G46


1926

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1927

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1928

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1929

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


1930

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1412


1931

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


1932

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1510


1933

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2317


1934

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2907


1935

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2930


1936

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2969


1937

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


1938

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


1939

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G12


1940

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G46


1941

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G46


1942

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G46


1943

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


1944

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G148


1945

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153


1946

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153


1947

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1948

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1949

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1950

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1951

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1952

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G155


1953

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


1954

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G200


1955

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G319


1956

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G355


1957

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G355


1958

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G355


1959

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370,






G1995, G2826, G2838


1960

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370,






G1995, G2826, G2838


1961

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G370,






G1995, G2826, G2838


1962

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1963

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1964

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1965

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1966

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1967

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1968

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1969

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1970

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1971

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1972

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1973

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1974

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1975

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1976

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1977

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1978

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1979

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G438


1980

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


1981

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485


1982

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G627


1983

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G651


1984

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G651


1985

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G651


1986

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1987

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G652


1988

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807


1989

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807


1990

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


1991

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


1992

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G839


1993

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


1994

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


1995

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


1996

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


1997

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


1998

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G916


1999

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G926


2000

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G926


2001

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G926


2002

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G961


2003

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


2004

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


2005

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


2006

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G975


2007

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


2008

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


2009

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


2010

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1011


2011

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1037


2012

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1142


2013

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


2014

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


2015

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


2016

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1206


2017

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1274


2018

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1274


2019

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1276


2020

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1357,






G1452


2021

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1412


2022

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1412


2023

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


2024

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


2025

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


2026

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


2027

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


2028

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


2029

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


2030

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1451


2031

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1468


2032

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1482


2033

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1510


2034

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


2035

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1660


2036

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1779


2037

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1893


2038

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


2039

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


2040

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


2041

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


2042

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1928


2043

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1968


2044

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1983


2045

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988


2046

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2041


2047

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2041


2048

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


2049

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


2050

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


2051

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2142


2052

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2207


2053

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2207


2054

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2319


2055

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2334


2056

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2382


2057

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2382


2058

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2432


2059

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2459


2060

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2536


2061

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2536


2062

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


2063

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


2064

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2567


2065

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2571


2066

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2650


2067

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2650


2068

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


2069

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2717


2070

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2741


2071

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2741


2072

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


2073

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


2074

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2768


2075

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


2076

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2776


2077

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2784


2078

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2839


2079

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


2080

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


2081

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


2082

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


2083

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


2084

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2854


2085

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2859


2086

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2865


2087

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2865


2088

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2885


2089

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2907


2090

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2933


2091

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2969


2092

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2979


2093

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2981,






G2982


2094

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2983


2095

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2990


2096

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2990


2097

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3055


2098

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3067


2099

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3067


2100

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3076


2101

DNA
Lycopersicon esculentum
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G3083


2102
G131_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P15154 (sequence variant)


2103
G324_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P3299 (sequence variant)


2104
G386_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P15647 (sequence variant)


2105
G624_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P2461.7 (sequence variant)


2106
G651_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P2812 (sequence variant)


2107
G744_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P15010 (sequence variant)


2108
G1037_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P15001 (sequence variant)


2109
G1150_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P15631 (sequence variant)


2110
G2041_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P13846 (sequence variant)


2111
G2106_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P13733 (sequence variant)


2112
G2319_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P13388 (sequence variant)


2113
G2453_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P2750 (sequence variant)


2114
G2453_2
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P3322 (sequence variant)


2115
G2559_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P15538 (sequence variant)


2116
G2639_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P15568 (sequence variant)


2117
G2679_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P15056 (sequence variant)


2118
G2768_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P15431 (sequence variant)


2119
G2771_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P15182 (sequence variant)


2120
G2784_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P15148 (sequence variant)


2121
G2802_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P2771 (sequence variant)


2122
G2907_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P15595 (sequence variant)


2123
G3003_1
DNA
Arabidopsis thaliana
Expression construct P3291 (sequence variant)


2124
G3380
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1795






Member of G1792 clade


2125
G3380
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1795 Member of G1792 clade


2126
G3381
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G30






Member of G1792 clade


2127
G3381
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G30 Member of G1792 clade


2128
G3383
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1792






Member of G1792 clade


2129
G3383
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G1792 Member of G1792 clade


2130
G3392
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G682






Member of G1816 and G2718 clade


2131
G3392
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G682 Member of G1816 and G2718






clade


2132
G3393
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G682






Member of G1816 and G2718 clade


2133
G3393
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G682 Member of G1816 and G2718






clade


2134
G3394
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2135
G3394
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2136
G3395
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2137
G3395
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2138
G3396
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2139
G3396
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2140
G3397
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2141
G3397
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2142
G3398
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2143
G3398
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2144
G3429
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2145
G3429
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2146
G3431
DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G682






Member of G1816 and G2718 clade


2147
G3431
PRT
Zea mays
Orthologous to G682 Member of G1816 and G2718






clade


2148
G3434
DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2149
G3434
PRT
Zea mays
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2150
G3435
DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G482






Member of G485 clade


2151
G3435
PRT
Zea mays
Orthologous to G482 Member of G485 clade


2152
G3436
DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2153
G3436
PRT
Zea mays
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2154
G3437
DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2155
G3437
PRT
Zea mays
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2156
G3444
DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G682






Member of G1816 and G2718 clade


2157
G3444
PRT
Zea mays
Orthologous to G682 Member of G1816 and G2718






clade


2158
G3445
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G225






Member of G1816 and G2718 clade


2159
G3445
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G225 Member of G1816 and G2718






clade


2160
G3446
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G225






Member of G1816 and G2718 clade


2161
G3446
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G225 Member of G1816 and G2718






clade


2162
G3447
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G225






Member of G1816 and G2718 clade


2163
G3447
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G225 Member of G1816 and G2718






clade


2164
G3448
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G225






Member of G1816 and G2718 clade


2165
G3448
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G225 Member of G1816 and G2718






clade


2166
G3449
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G225






Member of G1816 and G2718 clade


2167
G3449
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G225 Member of G1816 and G2718






clade


2168
G3450
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G682






Member of G1816 and G2718 clade


2169
G3450
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G682 Member of G1816 and G2718






clade


2170
G3470
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G482






Member of G485 clade


2171
G3470
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G482 Member of G485 clade


2172
G3471
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G482






Member of G485 clade


2173
G3471
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G482 Member of G485 clade


2174
G3472
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2175
G3472
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2176
G3473
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2177
G3473
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2178
G3474
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2179
G3474
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2180
G3475
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2181
G3475
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2182
G3476
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G482






Member of G485 clade


2183
G3476
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G485 Member of G482 clade


2184
G3477
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G482






Member of G485 clade


2185
G3477
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G485 Member of G482 clade


2186
G3478
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G485






Member of G485 clade


2187
G3478
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G485 Member of G485 clade


2188
G3479
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153






Member of G153 clade


2189
G3479
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G153 Member of G153 clade


2190
G3484
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153






Member of G153 clade


2191
G3484
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G153 Member of G153 clade


2192
G3485
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153






Member of G153 clade


2193
G3485
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G153 Member of G153 clade


2194
G3487
DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153






Member of G153 clade


2195
G3487
PRT
Zea mays
Orthologous to G153 Member of G153 clade


2196
G3488
DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153






Member of G153 clade


2197
G3488
PRT
Zea mays
Orthologous to G153 Member of G153 clade


2198
G3489
DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G153






Member of G153 clade


2199
G3489
PRT
Zea mays
Orthologous to G153 Member of G153 clade


2200
G3491
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807






Member of G807 clade


2201
G3491
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G807 Member of G807 clade


2202
G3494
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807






Member of G807 clade


2203
G3494
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G807 Member of G807 clade


2204
G3495
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807






Member of G807 clade


2205
G3495
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G807 Member of G807 clade


2206
G3512
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G807






Member of G807 clade


2207
G3512
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G807 Member of G807 clade


2208
G3515
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G30






Member of G1792 clade


2209
G3515
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G30 Member of G1792 clade


2210
G3516
DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1792






Member of G1792 clade


2211
G3516
PRT
Zea mays
Orthologous to G1792 Member of G1792 clade


2212
G3517
DNA
Zea mays
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1791






Member of G1792 clade


2213
G3517
PRT
Zea mays
Orthologous to G1791 Member of G1792 clade


2214
G3518
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1792






Member of G1792 clade


2215
G3518
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G1792 Member of G1792 clade


2216
G3519
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1792






Member of G1792 clade


2217
G3519
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G1792 Member of G1792 clade


2218
G3520
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1792






Member of G1792 clade


2219
G3520
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G1792 Member of G1792 clade


2220
G3527
DNA
Glycine max


2221
G3527
PRT
Glycine max


2222
G3528
DNA
Glycine max


2223
G3528
PRT
Glycine max


2224
G3643
DNA
Glycine max
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G47






Member of G47 and G2133 clade


2225
G3643
PRT
Glycine max
Orthologous to G47 Member of G47 and G2133 clade


2226
G3644
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G47






Member of G47 and G2133 clade


2227
G3644
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G47 Member of G47 and G2133 clade


2228
G3645
DNA
Brassica rapa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G47






Member of G47 and G2133 clade


2229
G3645
PRT
Brassica rapa
Orthologous to G47 Member of G47 and G2133 clade


2230
G3646
DNA
Brossica oleracea
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2133






Member of G47 and G2133 clade


2231
G3646
PRT
Brassica oleracea
Orthologous to G2133 Member of G47 and G2133 clade


2232
G3647
DNA
Zinnia elegans
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G47






Member of G47 and G2133 clade


2233
G3647
PRT
Zinnia elegans
Orthologous to G47 Member of G47 and G2133 clade


2234
G3649
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G47






and G2133 Member of G47 and G2133 clade


2235
G3649
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G47 and G2133 Member of G47 and






G2133 clade


2236
G3651
DNA
Oryza sativa
Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G2133






Member of G47 and G2133 clade


2237
G3651
PRT
Oryza sativa
Orthologous to G2133 Member of G47 and G2133 clade









EXAMPLES
The invention, now being generally described, will be more readily understood by reference to the following examples, which are included merely for purposes of illustration of certain aspects and embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to limit the invention. It will be recognized by one of the skill in the art that a transcription factor that is associated with a particular first trait may also be associated with at least one other, unrelated and inherent second trait which was not predicted by the first trait.
The complete descriptions of the traits associated with each polynucleotide of the invention are fully disclosed in Table 4 and Table 6. The complete description of the transcription factor gene family and identified conserved domains of the polypeptide encoded by the polynucleotide is fully disclosed in Table 5.
Example I
Full Length Gene Identification and Cloning
Putative transcription factor sequences (genomic or ESTs) related to known transcription factors were idetified in the Arabidopsis thaliana GenBank database using the tblastn sequence analysis program using default parameters and a P-value cutoff threshold of −4 or −5 or lower, depending on the length of the query sequence. Putative transcription factor sequence hits were then screened to identify those containing particular sequence strings. If the sequence hits contained such sequence strings, the sequences were confirmed as transcription factors.
Alternatively, Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA libraries derived from different tissues or treatments, or genomic libraries were screened to identify novel members of a transcription family using a low stringency hybridization approach. Probes were synthesized using gene specific primers in a standard PCR reaction (annealing temperature 60° C.) and labeled with 32P dCTP using the High Prime DNA Labeling Kit (Boehringer Mannheim Corp. (now Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, Ind.). Purified radiolbelled probes were added to filters immersed in Church hybridization medium (0.5 M NaPO4 pH 7.0, 7% SDS, 1% w/v bovine serum albumin) and hybridized overnight at 60° C. with shaking. Filters were washed two times for 45 to 60 minutes with 1×SCC, 1% SDS at 60° C.
To identify additional sequence 5′ or 3′ of a partial cDNA sequence in a cDNA library, 5′ and 3′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) was performed using the MARATHON cDNA amplification kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.). Generally, the method entailed first isolating poly(A) mRNA, performing first and second strand cDNA synthesis to generate double stranded cDNA, blunting cDNA ends, followed by ligation of the MARATHON Adaptor to the cDNA to form a library of adaptor-ligated ds cDNA.
Gene-specific primers were designed to be used along with adaptor specific primers for both 5′ and 3′ RACE reactions. Nested primers, rather than single primers, were used to increase PCR specificity. Using 5′ and 3′ RACE reactions, 5′ and 3′ RACE fragments were obtained, sequenced and cloned. The process can be repeated until 5′ and 3′ ends of the full-length gene were identified. Then the full-length cDNA was generated by PCR using primers specific to 5′ and 3′ ends of the gene by end-to-end PCR.
Example II
Construction of Expression Vectors
The sequence was amplified from a genomic or cDNA library using primers specific to sequences upstream and downstream of the coding region. The expression vector was pMEN20 or pMEN65, which are both derived from pMON316 (Sanders et al. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15:1543-1558) and contain the CaMV 35S promoter to express transgenes. To clone the sequence into the vector, both pMEN20 and the amplified DNA fragment were digested separately with SalI and NotI restriction enzymes at 37° C. for 2 hours. The digestion products were subject to electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The DNA fragments containing the sequence and the linearized plasmid were excised and purified by using a QIAQUICK gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia Calif.). The fragments of interest were ligated at a ratio of 3:1 (vector to insert). Ligation reactions using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs, Beverly Mass.) were carried out at 16° C. for 16 hours. The ligated DNAs were transformed into competent cells of the E. coli strain DH5alpha by using the heat shock method. The transformations were plated on LB plates containing 50 mg/l kanamycin (Sigma Chemical Co. St. Louis Mo.). Individual colonies were grown overnight in five milliliters of LB broth containing 50 mg/l kanamycin at 37° C. Plasmid DNA was purified by using Qiaquick Mini Prep kits (Qiagen).
Example III
Transformation of Agrobacterium with the Expression Vector
After the plasmid vector containing the gene was constructed, the vector was used to transform Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells expressing the gene products. The stock of Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells for transformation were made as described by Nagel et al. (1990) FEMS Microbiol Letts. 67: 325-328. Agrobacterium strain ABI was grown in 250 ml LB medium (Sigma) overnight at 28° C. with shaking until an absorbance over 1 cm at 600 nm (A600) of 0.5-1.0 was reached. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4,000×g for 15 min at 4° C. Cells were then resuspended in 250 μl chilled buffer (1 mM HEPES, pH adjusted to 7.0 with KOH). Cells were centrifuged again as described above and resuspended in 125 μl chilled buffer. Cells were then centrifuged and resuspended two more times in the same HEPES buffer as described above at a volume of 100 μl and 750 μl, respectively. Resuspended cells were then distributed into 40 μl aliquots, quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80° C.
Agrobacterium cells were transformed with plasmids prepared as described above following the protocol described by Nagel et al. (supra). For each DNA construct to be transformed, 50-100 ng DNA (generally resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) was mixed with 40 μl of Agrobacterium cells. The DNA/cell mixture was then transferred to a chilled cuvette with a 2 mm electrode gap and subject to a 2.5 kV charge dissipated at 25 μF and 200 μF using a Gene Pulser II apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). After electroporation, cells were immediately resuspended in 1.0 ml LB and allowed to recover without antibiotic selection for 2-4 hours at 28° C. in a shaking incubator. After recovery, cells were plated onto selective medium of LB broth containing 100 μg/ml spectinomycin (Sigma) and incubated for 24-48 hours at 28° C. Single colonies were then picked and inoculated in fresh medium. The presence of the plasmid construct was verified by PCR amplification and sequence analysis.
Example IV
Transformation of Arabidopsis Plants with Agrobacterium tumefaciens with Expression Vector
After transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens with plasmid vectors containing the gene, single Agrobacterium colonies were identified, propagated, and used to transform Arabidopsis plants. Briefly, 500 ml cultures of LB medium containing 50 mg/l kanamycin were inoculated with the colonies and grown at 28° C. with shaking for 2 days until an optical absorbance at 600 nm wavelength over 1 cm (A600) of >2.0 is reached. Cells were then harvested by centrifugation at 4,000×g for 10 min, and resuspended in infiltration medium (1⁄2× Murashige and Skoog salts (Sigma), 1× Gamborg's B-5 vitamins (Sigma), 5.0% (w/v) sucrose (Sigma), 0.044 μM benzylamino purine (Sigma), 200 μl/l Silwet L-77 (Lehle Seeds) until an A600 of 0.8 was reached.
Prior to transformation, Arabidopsis thaliana seeds (ecotype Columbia) were sown at a density of  ̃10 plants per 4′′ pot onto Pro-Mix BX potting medium (Hummert International) covered with fiberglass mesh (18 mm×16 mm). Plants were grown under continuous illumination (50-75 μE/m2/sec) at 22-23° C. with 65-70% relative humidity. After about 4 weeks, primary inflorescence stems (bolts) are cut off to encourage growth of multiple secondary bolts. After flowering of the mature secondary bolts, plants were prepared for transformation by removal of all siliques and opened flowers.
The pots were then immersed upside down in the mixture of Agrobacterium infiltration medium as described above for 30 sec, and placed on their sides to allow draining into a 1′×2′ flat surface covered with plastic wrap. After 24 h, the plastic wrap was removed and pots are turned upright. The immersion procedure was repeated one week later, for a total of two immersions per pot. Seeds were then collected from each transformation pot and analyzed following the protocol described below.
Example V
Identification of Arabidopsis Primary Transformants
Seeds collected from the transformation pots were sterilized essentially as follows. Seeds were dispersed into in a solution containing 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Sigma) and sterile water and washed by shaking the suspension for 20 min. The wash solution was then drained and replaced with fresh wash solution to wash the seeds for 20 min with shaking. After removal of the ethanol/detergent solution, a solution containing 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and 30% (v/v) bleach (CLOROX; Clorox Corp. Oakland Calif.) was added to the seeds, and the suspension was shaken for 10 min. After removal of the bleach/detergent solution, seeds were then washed five times in sterile distilled water. The seeds were stored in the last wash water at 4° C. for 2 days in the dark before being plated onto antibiotic selection medium (1× Murashige and Skoog salts (pH adjusted to 5.7 with 1M KOH), 1× Gamborg's B-5 vitamins, 0.9% phytagar (Life Technologies), and 50 mg/l kanamycin). Seeds were germinated under continuous illumination (50-75 μE/M2/sec) at 22-23° C. After 7-10 days of growth under these conditions, kanamycin resistant primary transformants (T1 generation) were visible and obtained. These seedlings were transferred first to fresh selection plates where the seedlings continued to grow for 3-5 more days, and then to soil (Pro-Mix BX potting medium).
Primary transformants were crossed and progeny seeds (T2) collected; kanamycin resistant seedlings were selected and analyzed. The expression levels of the recombinant polynucleotides in the transformants varies from about a 5% expression level increase to a least a 100% expression level increase. Similar observations are made with respect to polypeptide level expression.
Example VI
Identification of Arabidopsis Plants with Transcription Factor Gene Knockouts
The screening of insertion mutagenized Arabidopsis collections for null mutants in a known target gene was essentially as described in Krysan et al. (1999) Plant Cell 11: 2283-2290. Briefly, gene-specific primers, nested by 5-250 base pairs to each other, were designed from the 5′ and 3′ regions of a known target gene. Similarly, nested sets of primers were also created specific to each of the T-DNA or transposon ends (the “right” and “left” borders). All possible combinations of gene specific and T-DNA/transposon primers were used to detect by PCR an insertion event within or close to the target gene. The amplified DNA fragments were then sequenced which allows the precise determination of the T-DNA/transposon insertion point relative to the target gene. Insertion events within the coding or intervening sequence of the genes were deconvoluted from a pool comprising a plurality of insertion events to a single unique mutant plant for functional characterization. The method is described in more detail in Yu and Adam, U.S. application Ser. No. 09/177,733 filed Oct. 23, 1998.
Example VII
Identification of Modified Phenotypes in Overexpression or Gene Knockout Plants
Experiments were performed to identify those transformants or knockouts that exhibited modified biochemical characteristics. Among the biochemicals that were assayed were insoluble sugars, such as arabinose, fucose, galactose, mannose, rhamnose or xylose or the like; prenyl lipids, such as lutein, beta-carotene, xanthophyll-1, xanthophyll-2, chlorophylls A or B, or alpha-, delta- or gamma-tocopherol or the like; fatty acids, such as 16:0 (palmitic acid), 16:1 (palmitoleic acid), 18:0 (stearic acid), 18:1 (oleic acid), 18:2 (linoleic acid), 20:0, 18:3 (linolenic acid), 20:1 (eicosenoic acid), 20:2, 22:1 (erucic acid) or the like; waxes, such as by altering the levels of C29, C31, or C33 alkanes; sterols, such as brassicasterol, campesterol, stigmasterol, sitosterol or stigmastanol or the like, glucosinolates, protein or oil levels.
Fatty acids were measured using two methods depending on whether the tissue was from leaves or seeds. For leaves, lipids were extracted and esterified with hot methanolic H2SO4 and partitioned into hexane from methanolic brine. For seed fatty acids, seeds were pulverized and extracted in methanol:heptane:toluene: 2,2-dimethoxypropane:H2SO4 (39:34:20:5:2) for 90 minutes at 80° C. After cooling to room temperature the upper phase, containing the seed fatty acid esters, was subjected to GC analysis. Fatty acid esters from both seed and leaf tissues were analyzed with a SUPELCO SP-2330 column (Supelco, Bellefonte, Pa.).
Glucosinolates were purified from seeds or leaves by first heating the tissue at 95° C. for 10 minutes. Preheated ethanol:water (50:50) is added and after heating at 95° C. for a further 10 minutes, the extraction solvent is applied to a DEAE SEPHADEX column (Pharmacia) which had been previously equilibrated with 0.5 M pyridine acetate. Desulfoglucosinolates were eluted with 300 ul water and analyzed by reverse phase HPLC monitoring at 226 nm.
For wax alkanes, samples were extracted using an identical method as fatty acids and extracts were analyzed on a HP 5890 GC coupled with a 5973 MSD. Samples were chromatographically isolated on a J&W DB35 mass spectrometer (J&W Scientific Agilent Technologies, Folsom, Calif.).
To measure prenyl lipid levels, seeds or leaves were pulverized with 1 to 2% pyrogallol as an antioxidant. For seeds, extracted samples were filtered and a portion removed for tocopherol and carotenoid/chlorophyll analysis by HPLC. The remaining material was saponified for sterol determination. For leaves, an aliquot was removed and diluted with methanol and chlorophyll A, chlorophyll B, and total carotenoids measured by spectrophotometry by determining optical absorbance at 665.2 mn, 652.5 nm, and 470 nm. An aliquot was removed for tocopherol and carotenoid/chlorophyll composition by HPLC using a Waters μBondapak C18 column (4.6 mm×150 mm). The remaining methanolic solution was saponified with 10% KOH at 80° C. for one hour. The samples were cooled and diluted with a mixture of methanol and water. A solution of 2% methylene chloride in hexane was mixed in and the samples were centrifuged. The aqueous methanol phase was again re-extracted 2% methylene chloride in hexane and, after centrifugation, the two upper phases were combined and evaporated. 2% methylene chloride in hexane was added to the tubes and the samples were then extracted with one ml of water. The upper phase was removed, dried, and resuspended in 400 ul of 2% methylene chloride in hexane and analyzed by gas chromatography using a 50 m DB-5 ms (0.25 mm ID, 0.25 um phase, J&W Scientific).
Insoluble sugar levels were measured by the method essentially described by Reiter et al. (1999), Plant J. 12: 335-345. This method analyzes the neutral sugar composition of cell wall polymers found in Arabidopsis leaves. Soluble sugars were separated from sugar polymers by extracting leaves with hot 70% ethanol. The remaining residue containing the insoluble polysaccharides was then acid hydrolyzed with allose added as an internal standard. Sugar monomers generated by the hydrolysis were then reduced to the corresponding alditols by treatment with NaBH4, then were acetylated to generate the volatile alditol acetates which were then analyzed by GC-FID. Identity of the peaks was determined by comparing the retention times of known sugars converted to the corresponding alditol acetates with the retention times of peaks from wild-type plant extracts. Alditol acetates were analyzed on a Supelco SP-2330 capillary column (30 m×250 μm×0.2 μm) using a temperature program beginning at 180° C. for 2 minutes followed by an increase to 220° C. in 4 minutes. After holding at 220° C. for 10 minutes, the oven temperature is increased to 240° C. in 2 minutes and held at this temperature for 10 minutes and brought back to room temperature.
To identify plants with alterations in total seed oil or protein content, 150 mg of seeds from T2 progeny plants were subjected to analysis by Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) using a Foss NirSystems Model 6500 with a spinning cup transport system. NIRS is a non-destructive analytical method used to determine seed oil and protein composition. Infrared is the region of the electromagnetic spectrum located after the visible region in the direction of longer wavelengths. ‘Near infrared’ owns its name for being the infrared region near to the visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum. For practical purposes, near infrared comprises wavelengths between 800 and 2500 nm. NIRS is applied to organic compounds rich in O—H bonds (such as moisture, carbohydrates, and fats), C—H bonds (such as organic compounds and petroleum derivatives), and N—H bonds (such as proteins and amino acids). The NIRS analytical instruments operate by statistically correlating NIRS signals at several wavelengths with the characteristic or property intended to be measured. All biological substances contain thousands of C—H, O—H, and N—H bonds. Therefore, the exposure to near infrared radiation of a biological sample, such as a seed, results in a complex spectrum which contains qualitative and quantitative information about the physical and chemical composition of that sample.
The numerical value of a specific analyte in the sample, such as protein content or oil content, is mediated by a calibration approach known as chemometrics. Chemometrics applies statistical methods such as multiple linear regression (MLR), partial least squares (PLS), and principle component analysis (PCA) to the spectral data and correlates them with a physical property or other factor, that property or factor is directly determined rather than the analyte concentration itself. The method first provides “wet chemistry” data of the samples required to develop the calibration.
Calibration of NIRS response was performed using data obtained by wet chemical analysis of a population of Arabidopsis ecotypes that were expected to represent diversity of oil and protein levels.
The exact oil composition of each ecotype used in the calibration experiment was performed using gravimetric analysis of oils extracted from seed samples (0.5 g or 1.0 g) by the accelerated solvent extraction method (ASE; Dionex Corp, Sunnyvale, Calif.). The extraction method was validated against certified canola samples (Community Bureau of Reference, Belgium). Seed samples from each ecotype (0.5 g or 1 g) were subjected to accelerated solvent extraction and the resulting extracted oil weights compared to the weight of oil recovered from canola seed that has been certified for oil content (Community Bureau of Reference). The oil calibration equation was based on 57 samples with a range of oil contents from 27.0% to 50.8%. To check the validity of the calibration curve, an additional set of samples was extracted by ASE and predicted using the oil calibration equation. This validation set counted 46 samples, ranging from 27.9% to 47.5% oil, and had a predicted standard error of performance of 0.63%. The wet chemical method for protein was elemental analysis (% N×6.0) using the average of 3 representative samples of 5 mg each validated against certified ground corn (NIST). The instrumentation was an Elementar Vario-EL III elemental analyzer operated in CNS operating mode (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany).
The protein calibration equation was based on a library of 63 samples with a range of protein contents from 17.4% to 31.2%. An additional set of samples was analyzed for protein by elemental analysis (n=57) and scanned by NIRS in order to validate the protein prediction equation. The protein range of the validation set was from 16.8% to 31.2% and the standard error of prediction was 0.468%.
NIRS analysis of Arabidopsis seed was carried out on between 40-300 mg experimental sample. The oil and protein contents were predicted using the respective calibration equations.
Data obtained from NIRS analysis was analyzed statistically using a nearest-neighbor (N-N) analysis. The N-N analysis allows removal of within-block spatial variability in a fairly flexible fashion, which does not require prior knowledge of the pattern of variability in the chamber. Ideally, all hybrids are grown under identical experimental conditions within a block (rep). In reality, even in many block designs, significant within-block variability exists. Nearest-neighbor procedures are based on assumption that environmental effect of a plot is closely related to that of its neighbors. Nearest-neighbor methods use information from adjacent plots to adjust for within-block heterogeneity and so provide more precise estimates of treatment means and differences. If there is within-plot heterogeneity on a spatial scale that is larger than a single plot and smaller than the entire block, then yields from adjacent plots will be positively correlated. Information from neighboring plots can be used to reduce or remove the unwanted effect of the spatial heterogeneity, and hence improve the estimate of the treatment effect. Data from neighboring plots can also be used to reduce the influence of competition between adjacent plots. The Papadakis N-N analysis can be used with designs to remove within-block variability that would not be removed with the standard split plot analysis ((Papadakis (1973) Inst. d'Amelior. Plantes Thessaloniki (Greece) Bull. Scientif. No. 23; Papadakis (1984) Proc. Acad. Athens 59: 326-342).
Experiments were performed to identify those transformants or knockouts that exhibited modified sugar sensing. For such studies, seeds from transformants were germinated on media containing 5% glucose or 9.4% sucrose which normally partially restrict hypocotyl elongation. Plants with altered sugar sensing may have either longer or shorter hypocotyls than normal plants when grown on this media. Additionally, other plant traits may be varied such as root mass.
Experiments may be performed to identify those transformants or knockouts that exhibited an improved pathogen tolerance. For such studies, the transformants are exposed to biotropic fungal pathogens, such as Erysiphe orontii, and necrotropic fungal pathogens, such as Fusarium oxysporum. Fusarium oxysporum isolates cause vascular wilts and damping off of various annual vegetables, perennials and weeds (Mauch-Mani and Slusarenko (1994) Molec Plant-Microbe Interact. 7: 378-383). For Fusarium oxysporum experiments, plants are grown on Petri dishes and sprayed with a fresh spore suspension of F. oxysporum. The spore suspension is prepared as follows: A plug of fungal hyphae from a plate culture is placed on a fresh potato dextrose agar plate and allowed to spread for one week. Five ml sterile water is then added to the plate, swirled, and pipetted into 50 ml Armstrong Fusarium medium. Spores are grown overnight in Fusarium medium and then sprayed onto plants using a Preval paint sprayer. Plant tissue is harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen 48 hours post-infection.
Erysiphe orontii is a causal agent of powdery mildew. For Erysiphe orontii experiments, plants are grown approximately 4 weeks in a greenhouse under 12 hour light (20° C.,  ̃30% relative humidity (rh)). Individual leaves are infected with E. orontii spores from infected plants using a camel's hair brush, and the plants are transferred to a Percival growth chamber (20° C., 80% rh.). Plant tissue is harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen 7 days post-infection.
Botrytis cinerea is a necrotrophic pathogen. Botrytis cinerea is grown on potato dextrose agar under 12 hour light (20° C.,  ̃30% relative humidity (rh)). A spore culture is made by spreading 10 ml of sterile water on the fungus plate, swirling and transferring spores to 10 ml of sterile water. The spore inoculum (approx. 105 spores/ml) is then used to spray 10 day-old seedlings grown under sterile conditions on MS (minus sucrose) media. Symptoms are evaluated every day up to approximately 1 week.
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum hyphal cultures are grown in potato dextrose broth. One gram of hyphae is ground, filtered, spun down and resuspended in sterile water. A 1:10 dilution is used to spray 10 day-old seedlings grown aseptically under a 12 hour light/dark regime on MS (minus sucrose) media. Symptoms are evaluated every day up to approximately 1 week.
Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola (Psm) strain 4326 and pv maculicola strain 4326 was inoculated by hand at two doses. Two inoculation doses allows the differentiation between plants with enhanced susceptibility and plants with enhanced resistance to the pathogen. Plants are grown for 3 weeks in the greenhouse, then transferred to the growth chamber for the remainder of their growth. Psm ES4326 may be hand inoculated with 1 ml syringe on 3 fully-expanded leaves per plant (4 1⁄2 wk old), using at least 9 plants per overexpressing line at two inoculation doses, OD=0.005 and OD=0.0005. Disease scoring is performed at day 3 post-inoculation with pictures of the plants and leaves taken in parallel.
In some instances, expression patterns of the pathogen-induced genes (such as defense genes) may be monitored by microarray experiments. In these experiments, cDNAs are generated by PCR and resuspended at a final concentration of  ̃100 ng/ul in 3×SSC or 150 mM Na-phosphate (Eisen and Brown (1999) Methods Enzymol. 303: 179-205). The cDNAs are spotted on microscope glass slides coated with polylysine. The prepared cDNAs are aliquoted into 384 well plates and spotted on the slides using, for example, an x-y-z gantry (OmniGrid) which may be purchased from GeneMachines (Menlo Park, Calif.) outfitted with quill type pins which may be purchased from Telechem International (Sunnyvale, Calif.). After spotting, the arrays are cured for a minimum of one week at room temperature, rehydrated and blocked following the protocol recommended by Eisen and Brown (1999; supra).
Sample total RNA (10 μg) samples are labeled using fluorescent Cy3 and Cy5 dyes. Labeled samples are resuspended in 4×SSC/0.03% SDS/4 μg salmon sperm DNA/2 μg tRNA/50 mM Na-pyrophosphate, heated for 95° C. for 2.5 minutes, spun down and placed on the array. The array is then covered with a glass coverslip and placed in a sealed chamber. The chamber is then kept in a water bath at 62° C. overnight. The arrays are washed as described in Eisen and Brown (1999, supra) and scanned on a General Scanning 3000 laser scanner. The resulting files are subsequently quantified using IMAGENE, software (BioDiscovery, Los Angeles Calif.).
RT-PCR experiments may be performed to identify those genes induced after exposure to biotropic fungal pathogens, such as Erysiphe orontii, necrotropic fungal pathogens, such as Fusarium oxysporum, bacteria, viruses and salicylic acid, the latter being involved in a nonspecific resistance response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Generally, the gene expression patterns from ground plant leaf tissue is examined.
Reverse transcriptase PCR was conducted using gene specific primers within the coding region for each sequence identified. The primers were designed near the 3′ region of each DNA binding sequence initially identified.
Total RNA from these ground leaf tissues was isolated using the CTAB extraction protocol. Once extracted total RNA was normalized in concentration across all the tissue types to ensure that the PCR reaction for each tissue received the same amount of cDNA template using the 28S band as reference. Poly(A+) RNA was purified using a modified protocol from the Qiagen OLIGOTEX purification kit batch protocol. cDNA was synthesized using standard protocols. After the first strand cDNA synthesis, primers for Actin 2 were used to normalize the concentration of cDNA across the tissue types. Actin 2 is found to be constitutively expressed in fairly equal levels across the tissue types we are investigating.
For RT PCR, cDNA template was mixed with corresponding primers and Taq DNA polymerase. Each reaction consisted of 0.2 μl cDNA template, 2 μl 10× Tricine buffer, 2 μl 10× Tricine buffer and 16.8 μl water, 0.05 μl Primer 1, 0.05 μl, Primer 2, 0.3 μl Taq DNA polymerase and 8.6 μl water.
The 96 well plate is covered with microfilm and set in the thermocycler to start the reaction cycle. By way of illustration, the reaction cycle may comprise the following steps:
Step 1: 93° C. for 3 min;
Step 2: 93° C. for 30 sec;
Step 3: 65° C. for 1 min;
Step 4: 72° C. for 2 min;
Steps 2, 3 and 4 are repeated for 28 cycles;
Step 5: 72° C. for 5 min; and
STEP 6 4° C.
To amplify more products, for example, to identify genes that have very low expression, additional steps may be performed: The following method illustrates a method that may be used in this regard. The PCR plate is placed back in the thermocycler for 8 more cycles of steps 2-4.
Step 2 93° C. for 30 sec;
Step 3 65° C. for 1 min;
Step 4 72° C. for 2 min, repeated for 8 cycles; and
Step 5 4° C.
Eight microliters of PCR product and 1.5 μl of loading dye are loaded on a 1.2% agarose gel for analysis after 28 cycles and 36 cycles. Expression levels of specific transcripts are considered low if they were only detectable after 36 cycles of PCR. Expression levels are considered medium or high depending on the levels of transcript compared with observed transcript levels for an internal control such as actin2. Transcript levels are determined in repeat experiments and compared to transcript levels in control (e.g., non-transformed) plants.
Experiments were performed to identify those transformants or knockouts that exhibited an improved environmental stress tolerance. For such studies, the transformants were exposed to a variety of environmental stresses. Plants were exposed to chilling stress (6 hour exposure to 4-8° C.), heat stress (6 hour exposure to 32-37° C.), high salt stress (6 hour exposure to 200 mM NaCl), drought stress (168 hours after removing water from trays), osmotic stress (6 hour exposure to 3 M mannitol), or nutrient limitation (nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium) (nitrogen: all components of MS medium remained constant except N was reduced to 20 mg/l of NH4NO3; phosphate: all components of MS medium except KH2PO4, which was replaced by K2SO4; potassium: all components of MS medium except removal of KNO3 and KH2PO4, which were replaced by NaH4PO4).
Experiments were performed to identify those transformants or knockouts that exhibited a modified structure and development characteristics. For such studies, the transformants were observed by eye to identify novel structural or developmental characteristics associated with the ectopic expression of the polynucleotides or polypeptides of the invention.
Flowering time was measured by the number of rosette leaves present when a visible inflorescence of approximately 3 cm is apparent. Rosette and total leaf number on the progeny stem are tightly correlated with the timing of flowering (Koornneef et al. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 229: 57-66). The vernalization response was also measured. For vernalization treatments, seeds were sown to MS agar plates, sealed with micropore tape, and placed in a 4° C. cold room with low light levels for 6-8 weeks. The plates were then transferred to the growth rooms alongside plates containing freshly sown non-vernalized controls. Rosette leaves were counted when a visible inflorescence of approximately 3 cm was apparent.
Modified phenotypes observed for particular overexpressor or knockout plants are provided in Table 4. For a particular overexpressor that shows a less beneficial characteristic, it may be more useful to select a plant with a decreased expression of the particular transcription factor. For a particular knockout that shows a less beneficial characteristic, it may be more useful to select a plant with an increased expression of the particular transcription factor.
The sequences of the Sequence Listing or those in Tables 4-9, or those disclosed here, can be used to prepare transgenic plants and plants with altered traits. The specific transgenic plants listed below are produced from the sequences of the Sequence Listing, as noted. Tables 4 and 6 provide exemplary polynucleotide and polypeptide sequences of the invention.
Example VIII
Examples of Genes that Confer Significant Improvements to Plants
Examples of genes and homologs that confer significant improvements to knockout or overexpressing plants are noted below. Experimental observations made by us with regard to specific genes whose expression has been modified in overexpressing or knock-out plants, and potential applications based on these observations, are also presented.
This example provides experimental evidence for increased biomass and abiotic stress tolerance controlled by the transcription factor polypeptides and polypeptides of the invention.
Salt stress assays are intended to find genes that confer better germination, seedling vigor or growth in high salt. Evaporation from the soil surface causes upward water movement and salt accumulation in the upper soil layer where the seeds are placed. Thus, germination normally takes place at a salt concentration much higher than the mean salt concentration of in the whole soil profile. Plants differ in their tolerance to NaCl depending on their stage of development, therefore seed germination, seedling vigor, and plant growth responses are evaluated.
Osmotic stress assays (including NaCl and mannitol assays) are intended to determine if an osmotic stress phenotype is NaCl-specific or if it is a general osmotic stress related phenotype. Plants tolerant to osmotic stress could also have more tolerance to drought and/or freezing.
Drought assays are intended to find genes that mediate better plant survival after short-term, severe water deprivation. Ion leakage will be measured if needed. Osmotic stress tolerance would also support a drought tolerant phenotype.
Temperature stress assays are intended to find genes that confer better germination, seedling vigor or plant growth under temperature stress (cold, freezing and heat).
Sugar sensing assays are intended to find genes involved in sugar sensing by germinating seeds on high concentrations of sucrose and glucose and looking for degrees of hypocotyl elongation. The germination assay on mannitol controls for responses related to osmotic stress. Sugars are key regulatory molecules that affect diverse processes in higher plants including germination, growth, flowering, senescence, sugar metabolism and photosynthesis. Sucrose is the major transport form of photosynthate and its flux through cells has been shown to affect gene expression and alter storage compound accumulation in seeds (source-sink relationships). Glucose-specific hexose-sensing has also been described in plants and is implicated in cell division and repression of “famine” genes (photosynthetic or glyoxylate cycles).
Germination assays followed modifications of the same basic protocol. Sterile seeds were sown on the conditional media listed below. Plates were incubated at 22° C. under 24-hour light (120-130 μEin/m2/s) in a growth chamber. Evaluation of germination and seedling vigor was conducted 3 to 15 days after planting. The basal media was 80% Murashige-Skoog medium (MS)+vitamins.
For salt and osmotic stress germination experiments, the medium was supplemented with 150 mM NaCl or 300 mM mannitol. Growth regulator sensitivity assays were performed in MS media, vitamins, and either 0.3 μM ABA, 9.4% sucrose, or 5% glucose.
Temperature stress cold germination experiments were carried out at 8° C. Heat stress germination experiments were conducted at 32° C. to 37° C. for 6 hours of exposure.
For stress experiments conducted with more mature plants, seeds were germinated and grown for seven days on MS+vitamins+1% sucrose at 22° C. and then transferred to chilling and heat stress conditions. The plants were either exposed to chilling stress (6 hour exposure to 4-8° C. ), or heat stress (32° C. was applied for five days, after which the plants were transferred back 22° C. for recovery and evaluated after 5 days relative to controls not exposed to the depressed or elevated temperature).
Results:
G12 (SEQ ID NO: 3)
Published Information
G12 (At4g36900) is on chromosome 4, contig fragment No. 86, GenBank accession number AL161590 (nid=7270623). The gene has been described as RAP2.10 by Okamuro et al., (1997) Proc Natl Acad Sci 94, 7076-7081.
Experimental Observations
G12 was determined to be ubiquitously expressed in plants. The function of G12 was studied using a line homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in the gene. G12 knockout mutant seedlings germinated in the dark on ACC-containing media (an ethylene insensitivity assay) were more severely stunted than the wild-type controls. These results indicate that G12 is involved in the ethylene signal transduction or response pathway, a process in which other proteins of the AP2/EREBP family are implicated. G12 KO mutant plants were wild-type in morphology and development, and in all other physiological and biochemical analyses that were performed.
In addition to the knockout mutant, the function of the gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which the cDNA clone for G12 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G12 caused seedlings to develop black necrotic tissue patches on cotyledons and seedlings died before the formation of true leaves. Some 35S::G12 overexpressing seedlings exhibited a weaker phenotype characterized by smaller necrotic patches on leaf margins. However, those plants arrested growth and died before flowering. No seed was obtained from any of the G12 overexpressing lines.
Utilities
The overexpression and knockout phenotypes indicate that G12 can have a role in regulating programmed cell death. Such a function could have various applications. The gene, its equivalogs, or its targets could be used to induce cell death in a controlled manner in specific tissues or in response to pathogen attack. For example, if the gene was specifically active in gametes or reproductive organs, it might be used to achieve male or female sterility. Alternatively, in the latter scenario, it might restrict the spread of a pathogen infection through a plant.
G30 (SEQ ID NO: 7)
Published Information
G30 (At1g04370) is part of the BAC clone F19P19, GenBank accession number AC000104 (nid=2341023).
Experimental Observations
Initial experiments were performed with G30 knockout mutant plants. However, these experiments did not uncover the functions of the gene.
In order to characterize the gene further, 35S::G30 overexpressing lines were generated. Morphological analysis of the transgenic plants indicated that G30 could be involved in light regulation: the seedlings had long hypocotyls and elongated cotyledon petioles. In addition, some of the seedlings also had longer roots compared to control plants. At later stages, the plants became darker green, and had glossy leaves, perhaps indicating elevated levels of epidermal wax. The phenotype for G30 overexpression resembled those produced by related AP2 genes.
Utilities
Based on the appearance of 35S::G30 leaves, the gene could be used to engineer changes in the composition and amount of leaf surface components (most likely wax). The ability to manipulate wax composition, amount, or distribution could modify plant tolerance to drought and low humidity, or resistance to insects or pathogens. Additionally, in some species, wax is a valuable commodity and altering its accumulation and/or composition could enhance yield.
The phenotypes of 35S::G30 seedlings indicate that the gene may also be used to manipulate light-regulated developmental processes like shade avoidance. Eliminating shading responses might allow increased planting densities with subsequent yield enhancement.
Additionally, if the dark coloration of 35S::G30 lines reflects an increase in biochemical composition, the gene might be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield.
G46 (SEQ ID NO: 9)
Published Information
G46 was first identified in the sequence of P1 clone MBK20 (GenBank accession number AB010070, gene MBK20.1). No information is available about the function(s) of G46.
Experimental Observations
RT-PCR experiments revealed that G46 was ubiquitously expressed, but was potentially induced by stress conditions such as auxin, heat, salt and Erysiphe. 
The function of G46 was studied using a line homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in the gene. G46 knockout mutant plants were indistinguishable from wild-type in all assays performed.
The function of G46 was also analyzed using transgenic plants in which a cDNA clone of the gene was expressed under the control of the 35 S promoter. A number of lines were larger than wild-type plants, developed more rapidly, and yielded an increased quantity of seed compared to wild-type controls.
In the physiological analysis, all three 35S::G46 lines (number 32, 35, and 36) tested showed more resistance to severe water deprivation stress. Seedlings were generally larger and greener than the control plants exposed to the same conditions.
35S::G46 plants were also significantly larger and greener in a soil-based drought assay than wild-type control plants.
Utilities
The reduced sensitivity of 35S::G46 lines in the dehydration stress assay indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to engineer crops with increased tolerance to drought, salt, freezing and/or chilling stress, or increased water use efficiency.
Additionally, the increased size and growth rate seen in some of the lines indicated that the gene or its equivalogs can be used to increase crop productivity.
G47 (SEQ ID NO: 11)
Published Information
G47 corresponds to gene T22J18.2 (AAC25505). No information is available about the function(s) of G47.
Experimental Observations
The function of G47 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G47 resulted in a variety of morphological and physiological phenotypic alterations.
35S::G47 plants showed enhanced tolerance to osmotic stress. In a root growth assay on PEG containing media, G47 overexpressing transgenic seedlings were larger and had more root growth compared to the wild-type controls (FIG. 3A). Interestingly, G47 expression levels might be altered by environmental conditions, in particular reduced by salt and osmotic stresses. In addition to the phenotype observed in the osmotic stress assay, germination efficiency for the seeds from G47 overexpressors was low.
35S::G47 plants were also significantly larger and greener in a soil-based drought assay than wild-type controls plants.
Overexpression of G47 also produced a substantial delay in flowering time and caused a marked change in shoot architecture. 35S::G47 transformants were small at early stages and switched to flowering more than a week later than wild-type controls (continuous light conditions). Interestingly, the inflorescences from these plants appeared thick and fleshy, had reduced apical dominance, and exhibited reduced internode elongation leading to a short compact stature (FIG. 3B). The branching pattern of the stems also appeared abnormal, with the primary shoot becoming ‘kinked’ at each coflorescence node. Additionally, the plants showed slightly reduced fertility and formed rather small siliques that were borne on short pedicels and held vertically, close against the stem.
Additional alterations were detected in the inflorescence stems of 35S::G47 plants. Stem sections from T2-21 and T2-24 plants were of wider diameter, and had large irregular vascular bundles containing a much greater number of xylem vessels than wild type. Furthermore some of the xylem vessels within the bundles appeared narrow and were possibly more lignified than were those of controls.
G47 was expressed at higher levels in rosette leaves, and transcripts can be detected in other tissues (flower, embryo, silique, and germinating seedling), but apparently not in roots.
Utilities
G47 or its equivalogs could potentially be used to manipulate flowering time, to modify plant architecture and stem structure, including development of vascular tissues and lignin content, and to improve plant performance under drought and osmotic stress conditions.
The use of G47 or its equivalogs from tree species could offer the potential for modulating lignin content. This might allow the quality of wood used for furniture or construction to be improved.
G148 (SEQ ID NO: 39)
Published Information
G148 corresponds to AGAMOUS-LIKE 13 (AGL13), and was originally identified based on its conserved MADS domain (Purugganan et al. (1995) Genetics 140: 345-356.; Rounsley et al. (1995). Plant Cell 7: 1259-1269). No functional information about G148 is available in the public domain. However, its expression pattern indicated that the gene has a role in ovule development; AGL13 transcript was present in ovules at the time of integument development, but fell following fertilization. Additionally, lower levels of expression were found in anther filaments and style tissue (Rounsley et al. (1995) supra).
Experimental Observations
Homozygotes were analyzed for a transposon insertion (SLAT collection) within G148; these plants showed no obvious macroscopic changes in morphology and exhibited a similar response to wild type in all of the physiological assays performed.
The effects of G148 overexpression were studied by generating transgenic lines in which a G148 genomic clone was expressed from the 35S CaMV promoter. 35S::G148 transformants displayed a range of morphological changes including a severe reduction in overall plant size, leaf curling, accelerated flowering, and terminal flower formation. Such changes indicate that G148 influences the genetic networks controlling various aspects of development including flowering time and meristem determinacy.
Utilities
The morphological changes seen in the overexpression lines demonstrate that G148 could be used to manipulate various aspects of plant development.
The appearance of terminal flowers in 35S::G148 transformants indicated that the gene or its orthologs can modify inflorescence architecture and confer a determinate habit in species where the shoots otherwise show an indeterminate growth pattern. Such changes completely alter the overall plant form, and may, for example, facilitate mechanical harvesting (as already exemplified by the SELF-PRUNING gene, which controls shoot determinacy in tomato, Pnueli L et al. (1998). Development 125: 1979-1989).
Additionally, the accelerated switch to reproductive growth seen in 35S::G148 plants, indicated that the gene can be used to manipulate flowering time in commercial species. Specifically, the gene can accelerate flowering or eliminate any requirement for vernalization. In some instances, a faster cycling time might allow additional harvests of a crop to be made within a given growing season. Shortening generation times can also help speed-up breeding programs, particularly in species such as trees, which grow for many years before flowering.
G151 (SEQ ID NO: 41)
Published Information
G151 corresponds to AGL15, a gene isolated by virtue of its conserved MADS box sequence (Rounsley et al. (1995). Plant Cell 7: 1259-1269) and by its preferential expression in young Brassica napus embryos (Heck et al. (1995) Plant Cell 7:1271-1282). On the basis of AGL15 expression patterns, it has been suggested that this gene might be involved in embryogenesis (Heck et al., 1995; supra, Perry et al. (1996) Plant Cell 8:1977-1989; Perry et al. (1999) Plant Physiol. 120:121-130). In addition, overexpression of AGL15 has been shown to inhibit perianth organ senescence and abscission (Fernandez et al. (2000) Plant Cell 12:183-198). However, G151/AGL15 still remains poorly characterized, and the gene likely has multiple roles.
G151 is expressed preferentially during embryogenesis and accumulates during early seed development (Perry et al., 1996, supra). AGL15-specific antibodies were used to demonstrate that AGL15 accumulates before fertilization in the cytoplasm of cells of the egg apparatus and moves into the nucleus during early stages of development in the suspensor, embryo, and endosperm (Perry et al., 1996; 1999, supra). Relatively high levels of AGL15 are present in the nuclei during embryo morphogenesis and until the seeds start to dry in Brassica, maize, and Arabidopsis. It has also been shown that AGL15 is associated with the chromosomes during mitosis, and gel mobility shift assays were used to demonstrate that the protein binds DNA in a sequence-specific manner (Perry et al., 1996, supra).
AGL15 expression, however, is not restricted to embryonic tissues. It has been found that the AGL15 protein accumulates transiently in the shoot apices of young Arabidopsis and Brassica seedlings, and that promoter activity is associated with the shoot apex and the base of leaf petioles throughout the vegetative phase (Fernandez et al. (2000) supra). In addition, during the reproductive phase, AGL15 accumulates transiently in floral buds (Fernandez et al. (2000) supra). When AGL15 was expressed in Arabidopsis under the control of a strong constitutive promoter, delayed abscission of perianth organs in the flowers was noted, changes in leaf shape occurred, and some age-dependent developmental processes (including the transition to flowering and fruit maturation) were delayed (Fernandez et al. (2000) supra).
Experimental Observations
The function of G151 was analyzed using a line that was homozygous for a T-DNA insertion within the gene. However, these plants displayed no consistent differences to wild type in any of the assays performed. We surmised that this could be due to potential redundancy between G151 and a highly related gene, G858 (AGL18). (G858 and G151 from a monophyletic clade within the Arabidopsis MADS box gene family (Alvarez-Buylla et al. (2000) Plant J. 24:457-466).
RT-PCR experiments also indicated that G151 is expressed ubiquitously, with the highest levels occurring in embryo and silique tissues. These results confirmed and expanded previously published observations describing that AGL15/G151 is preferentially expressed in the developing embryo, and also in germinating seedlings and leaf tissue (Rounsley et al. (1995) supra; Heck et al., (1995) supra; Perry et al., (1996, 1999) supra). In addition, G151 expression appeared to be induced by auxin.
35S::G151 overexpressing lines displayed a wild-type response in all of the physiological assays. Furthermore, although our lines expressed the transgene (determined by RT-PCR), for unknown reasons, we failed to recapitulate the effects on petal and sepal abscission, leaf shape, and flowering time that had been obtained by Fernandez et al. (2000) supra. It is noteworthy that Fernandez et al. attained much more pronounced results, and detected much higher levels of AGL15 protein, in 35S::AGL15 lines that harbored a genomic clone of the gene, rather than a cDNA clone. All of the 35S::G151 lines we created contained a cDNA clone; it is possible that the transcript from this transgene was less stable those in the ‘genomic lines’ of Fernandez et al. (2000). The discrepancy in results might also derive from differences in the lengths of 5′ UTR included in the overexpression construct, or differences in the strengths of different versions of the 35S promoters that were used.
Interestingly, however, in a small number of lines we noted an effect, which was not explicitly mentioned by Fernandez et al. (2000); the seeds were larger than were those of wild type. It is not clear, though, whether this could have been related to delayed seed ripening, which Fernandez et al. documented, or whether it was due to some other aspect of the G151 role in seed or embryo development.
Utilities
Based on the publicly available data, G151 or its equivalogs could likely be used to manipulate age related developmental processes such as flowering time, seed maturation and floral organ retention. The latter trait might be of particular interest to the ornamental plant industry and might allow the ‘campaign life’ of flowers to be extended.
This gene or its equivalogs may also be used to increase seed size and yield. The promoter of G151 might be useful for engineering auxin-inducible expression.
G153 (SEQ ID NO: 43)
Published Information
G153 corresponds to the Arabidopsis ANR1 gene. This locus was identified by Zhang and Forde (1998) as a MADS box gene that is rapidly induced in the roots of nitrogen starved seedlings, following exposure to a nitrate source. Additionally, it was shown that transgenic lines in which an antisense clone of ANR1 is overexpressed show altered sensitivity to nitrate and, unlike wild-type plants, do not exhibit lateral root proliferation in response to nitrate treatments. From these data, it was concluded that ANR1 is a key regulator of nutrient-induced changes in root architecture (Zhang and Forde (1998) Science 279: 407-409).
However, Wang et al. ((2000) Plant Cell 12, 1491-1509) have data that contradicts the results of Zhang and Forde (1998). These authors found that ANR1 is actually repressed, rather than induced, following treatment of nitrogen starved seedlings (grown on 10 mM ammonium succinate as the sole nitrogen source) with 5 mM nitrate.
A phylogenetic analysis of the Arabidopsis MADS box gene family situated ANR1 in same clade as three other MADS box genes: AGL16 (G860), AGL17 (G152) and AGL21 (G1760) (Alvarez-Buylla et al. (2000) Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 97: 5328-5333). Two of the genes, AGL17 and AGL21 were recently shown to be expressed in specific zones of the root, indicating that different members of the ANR1 clade may play distinct regulatory roles during root development (Burgeffet al. (2002 Planta 214: 365-372).
The ANR1 sequence (GenBank accession AX507709) has also been included in a patent publication (WO0216655A) by Harper et al. (2002).
Experimental Observations
RT-PCR experiments revealed that G153 is up-regulated in leaves in response to heat and Fusarium treatments. Lower levels of induction were also observed following auxin, ABA, and cold treatments, indicating that G153 might have a role in a variety of stress responses.
To further assess the function of the gene, 35S::G153 overexpressing lines were generated and subjected to a suite of assays. Around a third of the lines showed a marked acceleration in the onset of flowering, indicating that the gene might impinge on genetic pathways that regulate flowering time.
In addition to the effects on flowering, 35S::G153 lines displayed an enhanced performance in an assay intended to reveal alterations in C/N sensing. 35S::G153 seedlings contained less anthocyanin and in a number of cases were larger than wild-type controls grown on high sucrose/N-plates. Seedlings were also larger and greener on high sucrose/N-plates that had been supplemented with glutamine. Together, these data indicated that overexpression of G153 may alter the ability to modulate carbon and/or nitrogen uptake and utilization.
It should be noted that a closely related gene, G1760, prior to the C/N sensing assay being implemented. Like 35S::G153 transformants, 35S::G1760 lines also exhibited early flowering, and RT-PCR studies showed G1760 to be predominantly expressed in roots and to be stress responsive. Thus, G1760 and G153 could have similar and/or overlapping functions.
Utilities
The response of G153 expression to different physiological treatments indicates that the gene or its equivalogs could be used to improve resistance to a variety of different stresses. In particular, the enhanced performance of 35S::G153 lines under low nitrogen conditions indicated that G153 might be used to engineer crops that could thrive in environments with reduced nitrogen availability.
The finding that 35S::G153 lines make less anthocyanin on high sucrose media containing glutamine indicated that G153 or its equivalogs might be used to modify carbon and nitrogen status, and hence alter assimilate partitioning.
Given the early flowering seen amongst the 35S::G153 transformants, the gene or its equivalogs might also be applied to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, G153 could be used to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
G155 (SEQ ID NO: 45)
Published Information
G155 corresponds to AGAMOUS-LIKE 8 (AGL8), and was originally identified based on its conserved MADS domain (Mandel et al. (1995) Plant Cell 7: 1763-1771). The gene behaves as an early marker of the switch to reproductive growth; AGL8 RNA is not present during vegetative growth, but accumulates to high levels in the inflorescence apical meristem, as well as in the inflorescence stem and cauline leaves (Mandel et al. supra; Hempel et al. (1997) Development 124: 3845-3853). Additionally, AGL8 RNA is excluded from the young flower primordia that arise on the flanks of the inflorescence meristem (Mandel et al. supra). Such expression patterns indicate that AGL8 could have a role in maintaining the separation between inflorescence and floral meristem identity. Later, AGL8 RNA also accumulates in the walls of the developing carpels (Gu et al. (1998) Development 125: 1509-1517), indicating that it functions in fruit development. This has been confirmed through the study of mutants; the gene was found to have a major role in fruit valve differentiation. Loss of function mutants form siliques that lack coordinated growth, often fail to dehiscence, show premature rupture of the carpel valves, and become overcrowded with seeds (Gu et al. (1998) supra). Based on this phenotype, the gene was renamed FRUITFUL (FUL). Overexpression lines for FUL also show abnormalities in silique shattering and it has been shown that the gene acts as an inhibitor of the SHATTERPROOF (SHP1, SHP2; GIDs G136, G140) genes (Ferrandiz et al. (2000) Science 289: 436-438).
Experimental Observations
To determine whether G155 has functions additional to its known roles in fruit development, overexpression lines were generated and subjected to a battery of assays. 35S::G155 transformants exhibited early flowering and a number of lines also developed terminal flowers, giving a phenotype very similar to that exhibited by the terminal flower 1 mutant (Shannon et al. (1991) Plant Cell 3: 877-892.; Bradley et al. (1997) Science 275: 80-83. Alterations in silique development in the transformed lines were not detected. However, given that such effects are thought to occur through inhibition of the SHP genes, it is possible that the G155 expression levels in the 35S::G155 lines were not sufficiently high enough to elicit such effects, compared to the 35S::FUL lines reported by Ferrandiz et al. (2000), supra.
In addition to the changes in morphology, when subjected to physiological assays, 35S::G155 transformants showed increased sensitivity to osmotic stress in germination assays on either glucose or mannitol plates.
Utilities
Based on its published function, G155 can manipulate flower and fruit traits in commercial species. The overexpression data o demonstrated that G155 or its orthologs could be used to manipulate various other aspects of plant development.
The appearance of terminal flowers in 35S::G155 transformants indicated that the gene can modify inflorescence architecture and confer a determinate habit in species where the shoots show an indeterminate growth pattern. Such changes can completely alter the overall plant form, and can facilitate mechanical harvesting (as exemplified by the SELF-PRUNING gene, which controls shoot determinacy in tomato, Pnueli et al. (1998), supra).
Additionally, the rapid switch to reproductive growth seen in 35S::G155 plants, indicated that the gene can manipulate flowering time in commercial species. The gene could be used to accelerate flowering or eliminate any requirement for vernalization. In some instances, a faster cycling time might allow additional harvests of a crop to be made within a given growing season. Shortening generation times could also help speed-up breeding programs, particularly in species such as trees, which grow for many years before flowering.
The results of physiological assays on 35S::G155 plants indicate that the transcription factor can be used to manipulate abiotic stress responses or to modify source/sink relationships or other sugar regulated processes.
G200 (SEQ ID NO: 53)
Published Information
G200 corresponds to gene AT1g08810, and has been described as MYB60 (Kranz et al. (1998) Plant J. 16: 263-276). Expression analysis by reverse Northern blot indicates that G200 is slightly induced only in silique tissue and by IAA, cold and UV treatments (Kranz et al., 1998). No information is available about the function(s) of G200.
Experimental Observations
Analysis of a G200 knockout demonstrated that homozygous G200 knockout plants were phenotypically wild-type. G200 was determined to be ubiquitously expressed in Arabidopsis, contradicting the report by Kranz et al., supra.
Overexpression of G200 produced pleiotropic effects on plant development, causing alterations in overall plant size, coloration, flowering time, leaf shape, flower structure and fertility.
Relatively few 35S::G200 overexpressing lines were obtained; only 10 T1 plants were recovered from 4 separate 300 mg aliquots of T0 seed (a 300 mg aliquot typically yields 15-120 T1 plants), indicating that G200 can be lethal in plants that highly overexpress the gene.
The 35S::G200 lines that were isolated were generally very small, slightly pale in coloration, had rather pointed and/or contorted leaves, and abnormal phyllotaxy. A number of the lines also produced flower buds slightly earlier than wild type. Additionally, the flowers of overexpressing G200 plants were typically smaller and gaped open more widely than those of controls. Interestingly, in an assay intended to determine whether the transgene expression could alter C:N sensing, 35S::G200 seedlings contained less anthocyanins, and in some cases were greener, than wild-type controls grown on high sucrose/N deficient plates. This indicates that some of the growth defects observed in these lines were related to the carbon or nutrient availability in different growth substrates. Seedlings were also greener on high sucrose/nitrogen deficient/glutamine-supplemented plates. These data together indicate that overexpression of G200 may alter a plant's ability to modulate carbon and/or nitrogen uptake and utilization.
Utilities
The enhanced performance of G200 overexpression lines under low nitrogen conditions indicate that the gene could be used to engineer crops that could thrive under conditions of reduced nitrogen availability. Such a trait would afford the following benefits: (1) cost savings to the farmer by reducing the amount of fertilizer needed (2) environmental benefits of reduced fertilizer run-off into watersheds (3) improved yield and stress tolerance.
That 35S::G200 lines make less anthocyanin on high sucrose plus glutamine, indicates G200 might be used to modify carbon and nitrogen status, and hence assimilate partitioning.
G319 (SEQ ID NO: 71)
Published Information
G319 (At1g05290) was identified in the sequence of YAC yUP8H12, GenBank accession number AC000098, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other CONSTANS-like related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about G319.
Experimental Observations
Low levels of G319 expression were detected only in embryo and siliques. No expression of G319 was detected by RT-PCR in any other tissues or conditions tested. The function of G319 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G319 produced plants with short broad leaves and delayed flowering. 35S::G319 plants were wild-type in physiological analyses that were performed.
Utilities
G319 could be used to alter flowering time or produce plants with altered leaf morphology.
The delayed flowering displayed by 35S::G319 transformants indicates that the gene might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases. In some species (for example sugar beet), where the vegetative parts of the plant constitute the crop, it would be advantageous to delay or suppress flowering in order to prevent resources being diverted into reproductive development. Additionally, delaying flowering beyond the normal time of harvest could alleviate the risk of transgenic pollen escape from such crops.
Given the effects of G319 overexpression, it is likely that the activity of the gene (or its orthologs) could be modified to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
G354 (SEQ ID NO: 1381)
Published Information
G354 was identified in the sequence of BAC clone F12M12, GenBank accession number AL355775, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. G354 corresponds to ZAT7 (Meissner and Michael (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 33: 615-624).
Experimental Observations
The highest level of expression of G354 was observed in rosette leaves, embryos, and siliques. Some expression of G354 was also observed in flowers.
The function of this gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which G353 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. 35S::G354 plants had a reduction in flower pedicel length, and downward pointing siliques. This phenotype was very similar to that described for the brevipedicellus (bp) mutant (Koornneef et al. (1983) J. Hered. 74: 265-272) and in overexpression of a related gene G353. Other morphological changes in shoots were also observed in 35S::G354 plants. Many 35S::G354 seedlings had abnormal cotyledons, elongated, thickened hypocotyls, and short roots. The majority of T1 plants had a very extreme phenotype, were tiny, and arrested development without forming inflorescences. T1 plants showing more moderate effects had poor seed yield.
Overexpression of G354 in Arabidopsis resulted in seedlings with an altered response to light. In a germination assay conducted in darkness, G354 seedlings failed to show an etiolation response, as can been seen in FIG. 4 which shows G354 overexpressing and wild-type seedlings germinated on MS plates in the dark. In some cases the phenotype was severe; overexpression of the transgene resulted in reduced open and greenish cotyledons.
G354 overexpressors were also shown to be tolerant to water deprivation in a soil-based drought assay. Closely related paralogs of this gene, G353 and G2839, also showed an osmotic stress tolerance phenotype in a germination assay on media containing high sucrose; one line of 35S::G353 seedlings and several lines of 35S::G2839 were greener and had higher germination rates than controls. Thus, G354 and its paralogs G353 and G2839 appear to influence osmotic stress responses.
Utilities
G354 could be used to alter inflorescence structure, which may have value in production of novel ornamental plants.
G355 (SEQ ID NO: 79)
Published Information
G355 was identified in the sequence of BAC F3G5 (GenBank accession number AC005896; gene At2g37430), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. G355 is also known as ZAT11 (Meissner and Michael (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 33:615-624). No information has been published about the function of this gene.
Experimental Observations.
G355 expression was found to be weakly induced in rosette leaves by ABA treatment, drought stress, osmotic stress and infection by Erysiphe. An attempt to determine the function of G355 was analyzed using transgenic plants in which the expression of this gene was knocked out using a T-DNA insertion. However, these plants appeared wild-type in all morphological, physiological and biochemical assays performed.
The function of G355 was then studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. G355 overexpressing lines show more tolerance to salt stress and enhanced growth under limiting phosphate in root growth assays. Seedlings in both assays were larger, greener and had more root growth. 35S::G355 plants were wild-type in morphological analyses that were performed.
Utilities
Based on the increased salt tolerance exhibited by the 35S::G355 lines in physiology assays, this gene might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in saline soils, or under drought conditions. The trait is of particular importance early in the life cycle, since evaporation from the soil surface causes upward water movement, and salt accumulates in the upper soil layer where the seeds are placed. Thus, germination normally takes place at a salt concentration much higher than the mean salt level in the whole soil profile. Increased salt tolerance during the germination stage of a crop plant would therefore enhance survivability and yield.
The response of 35S::G355 seedlings to low phosphate conditions indicates that the gene could be used to manipulate nutrient uptake, or the ability to grow in poor nutrient soils. Phosphorus is a limiting nutrient in plant growth and is often added to soil as fertilizer. Young plants have a rapid intake of phosphate and sufficient phosphate is important for yield of root crops such as carrot, potato and parsnip. Phosphate costs represent a relatively small but significant portion of farmers' operating costs (3-4% of total costs to a corn farmer in the U.S., higher to a vegetable grower). Plants that are tolerant to phosphate deficiency could represent a cost saving for farmers, especially in areas where soils are very poor. They could also provide environmental benefits by reducing pollution from field runoff.
G370 (SEQ ID NO: 83)
Published Information
G370 was initially described as ZFP8, one of a set of C2H2 zinc finger proteins (Tague and Goodman (1995) Plant Mol. Biol. 28: 267-279). No functional information is available about ZFP8.
Experimental Observations
G370 was shown to be expressed throughout the aerial portions of the plant, but showed no detectable expression in roots. It was not induced by any condition tested. A knockout line homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in G370 was initially used to determine the function of this gene and showed more sensitivity to osmotic stress in a germination assay. Thus, when selectively regulated, the gene could have utility in creating plants with enhanced tolerance to dehydration stresses.
The function of G370 was also studied using overexpressing transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. All 35S::G370 primary transformants were small. Flowers showed a striking increase in trichome density on sepals, and carried ectopic trichomes on petals, anthers, and carpels. The changes in morphology produced by overexpression of G370 are indicative of heterochronic shifts (i.e. cells in various lineages and tissues adopt fates that are normally associated with cells from other developmental stages). For example, trichomes are normally associated with vegetative rather than reproductive organs. Additionally, aerial rosettes occur when a secondary inflorescence meristem develops in a manner comparable to a primary shoot meristem during the vegetative phase of growth.
Utilities
G370 is expressed throughout the aerial portions of the plant, but shows no detectable expression in roots. It was not induced by any condition tested. A line homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in G370 was initially used to determine the function of this gene and showed more sensitivity to osmotic stress in a germination assay and displayed defects in leaf and inflorescence development.
The function of G370 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. All 35S::G370 primary transformants were small and stunted. Flowers showed a striking increase in trichome density on sepals, and carried ectopic trichomes on petals, anthers, and carpels. Because insufficient seed was produced by 35S::G370 plants, no physiological analyses were performed.
G370 is closely related to five other Z-C2H2 genes: G2826, G1995, G361, G362, and G2838, which produced broadly similar phenotypes when overexpressed, such as ectopic trichomes on flowers, aerial rosettes, and various other morphological defects. The changes in morphology produced by overexpression of genes in this clade are suggestive of heterochronic shifts (i.e. cells in various lineages and tissues adopt fates that are normally associated with cells from other developmental stages). For example, trichomes are normally associated with vegetative rather than reproductive organs. Additionally, aerial rosettes occur when a secondary inflorescence meristem develops in a manner comparable to a primary shoot meristem during the vegetative phase of growth.
G372 (SEQ ID NO: 85)
Published Information
G372 was identified in the sequence of BAC clone T6D20, GenBank accession number U90439, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. There is no other published or public information about the function of G372.
Experimental Observations
As determined by RT-PCR, G372 is highly expressed under all environmental conditions tested. The function of G372 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G372 in Arabidopsis delayed the onset of flowering resulted in plants with increased in leaf size and plant biomass compared to control plants. Leaf size was twice that of the controls in many cases
Utilities
Given the effects of G372 overexpression, the gene or its orthologs could be used to modify leaf size and flowering time. Increasing leaf size in crop plants through the activity of G372 could result in the direct increase in yield in situations where the vegetative tissues are the harvested products. In addition, the increases in leaf surface area attributed to G372 activity could also result in yield increases in fruit bearing or seed bearing crops due to the increase in the photosynthetic capacity of larger leaves. In species such as sugarbeet where the vegetative parts of the plants constitute the crop and the reproductive tissues are discarded, it would be advantageous to delay or prevent flowering. Extending vegetative development can bring about large increases in yields. Additionally, a major concern is the escape of transgenic pollen from GMOs to wild species or so-called organic crops. Systems that prevent or delay vegetative transgenic crops from flowering could be used to mitigate this concern.
G438 (SEQ ID NO: 97)
Published Information
G438 was identified as a homeobox gene (MUP 24.4) within P1clone MUP 24 (GenBank accession number AB005246). We have also identified G438 as the Arabidopsis REVOLUTA (REV) gene (Ratcliffe et al. (2000) Plant Cell 12: 315-317). Based on its mutant phenotype, REV had previously been identified as having a key role in regulating the relative growth of apical versus non-apical (cambial) meristems (Alvarez, J. (1994). The SPITZEN gene. In Arabidopsis: An atlas of morphology and development, ed., J. Bowman). pp. 188-189. New York: Springer-Verlag); Talbert et al. (1995) Development 121: 2723-2735). The revoluta phenotype is highly pleiotropic but is characterized by a failure in development of all types of apical meristem: lateral shoot meristems in the axils of cauline and rosette leaves are often completely absent, or replaced by a solitary leaf. These effects are most evident in higher order shoots, but in some cases, the primary shoot meristem also fails and terminates growth in a cluster of filamentous structures. Rev floral meristems often fail to complete normal development and form incomplete or abortive filamentous structures. In contrast to apical meristems, structures formed by non-apical meristems, such as leaves, stems and floral organs often become abnormally large and contorted in the rev mutant.
The features of rev mutants are similar to those of the interfascicular fiberless1 (ifl1) mutant. Ifl1 was isolated during screens for mutants lacking normal stem fiber differentiation (Zhong et al. (1997) Plant Cell 9, 2159-2170). Wild-type Arabidopsis plants form interfascicular fibers which become lignified and add support to the inflorescence stem (Aloni et al. (1987) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 38: 179-204; Zhong et al. (1997) supra; Zhong et al. (1999) Plant Cell 11: 2139-2152. In the ifl1 mutant, normal interfascicular fibers are absent and the differentiation of both xylary fibers and vessel elements is disrupted. In additions to these internal features, ifl1 mutants have secondary morphological features very similar to those of rev. Recently the IFL1 gene was cloned by Zhong et al. (1999) supra. We have found that the IFL1 sequence and map position are identical to those of the REV gene cloned by us, demonstrating that REV and IFL1 are in fact, the same gene (Ratcliffe et al. (2000) supra).
It has been suggested that REV promotes the growth of apical meristems (including floral meristems) at the expense of non-apical meristems (Talbert et al. (1995) supra). It is not yet clear, however, whether expression data support such a role: strong expression of REV has been detected in interfascicular regions and developing vascular tissue, but in-situ expression analysis of apical meristems has not yet been reported (Zhong et al. (1999) supra). REV is a group III HD-ZIP protein and shares high sequence similarity (and organization) with the proteins encoded by three other Arabidopsis genes: Athb8, Athb9, and Athb14 (Sessa et al. (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38: 609-622). It is possible, therefore, that these genes act together in the same developmental process.
Closely Related Genes from Other Species
Blast searches reveal that the Physcomitrella patens homeobox protein PPHB10 has a relatively high degree of sequence identity to REV. The function of PpHB10 has not been published but it contains 465 conserved amino acid identities to REV across its 880 amino acid sequence. The existence of this similar protein in such a distantly related species suggests that potential orthologs from dicots or monocots would be expected to have a much greater degree of identity to REV over their sequences.
Experimental Observations
G438 was initially identified as MUP24.4, a novel putative homeobox gene within P1 clone MUP24 (GenBank Accession AB005246). Annotation was confirmed by isolation of the G438 cDNA: the cDNA had an in-frame stop codon immediately 5′ to the predicted start codon and comprised 18 exons that had been predicted within the genomic sequence.
Plants homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in the G438 sequence were obtained by PCR based screening of DNA pools from the Jack Collection of insertional mutants (Campisi et al. (1999) Plant Journal 17, 699-707). The T-DNA insertion was located 466 bp downstream of the putative start codon, and was predicted to create a null mutation. The mutation was recessive and produced a revoluta phenotype. The most prominent characteristic was a failure in the development of all types of apical meristem: lateral shoot meristems in the axils of cauline and rosette leaves were often completely absent, or replaced by a solitary leaf. These effects were most evident in higher order shoots, but in some cases, the primary shoot meristem also failed and terminated growth in a cluster of filamentous structures. Overall, the mutant had a dramatic reduction in branching at maturity compared to wild-type plants. The T-DNA insertion mutant also showed delayed senescence, had enlarged revolute leaves, long pendent stems, and exhibited floral meristem defects whereby flowers had enlarged organs, altered organ numbers, or sporadically failed to develop and were replaced by filamentous structures.
The similarity between the phenotype of KOG438 and that described for revoluta raised the possibility that the two genes were allelic. This possibility was strengthened by the fact that the rev mutation mapped to a region of chromosome 5 close to MUP 24 (Talbert et al. (1995) supra. To examine this, we obtained mutants homozygous for the rev-1 and rev-1011 alleles (kindly supplied by E. Meyerowitz) and compared their phenotype to the KOG438 mutant. The features of these mutants were very similar to those of KOG438. The most prominent characteristic of these mutants was a reduction in branching in the inflorescence. Populations of rev-1, KO438, rev-1011, and wild type (Col) plants were grown under continuous light conditions and the inflorescences examined at approximately 5 weeks after sowing. The structures present in axils of the cauline leaves on the primary shoot and the cauline leaves on secondary shoots (i.e. paraclades borne by the primary shoot) were noted (Table 10). Cauline leaf axils either contained a leaf, a shoot or were empty. The total number of visible shoots on the entire plant was also recorded.







TABLE 10







Structures present in axils of the cauline leaves on the primary shoot


and the cauline leaves on secondary shoot of G438 overexpressors


Wild type Columbia (12 plants scored at approx. 5 weeks from sowing)











primary cauline (26 on 12 plants)
secondary cauline (60 on 12 plants):





100% contained shoots
 95% contained shoots


 0% contained leaves
 0% contained leaves


 0% empty
 5% empty










Mean total number of visible shoots = 45 +/− 8


rev-1 (14 plants scored at approx. 5 weeks from sowing)








primary cauline (32 on 14 plants)
secondary cauline (24 on 14 plants):





 25% contained shoots
 0% contained shoots


 3% contained leaves
 0% contained leaves


 72% empty
100% empty










Mean total number of visible shoots = 3.5 +/− 0.8


rev-1011 (6 plants scored at approx. 5 weeks from sowing)








primary cauline (10 on 6 plants)
secondary cauline (2 on 6 plants):





 10% contained shoots
 0% contained shoots


 20% contained leaves
 0% contained leaves


 70% empty
100% empty










Mean total number of visible shoots = 2.2 +/− 1.2


KOG438 (27 plants scored at approx. 5 weeks from sowing)








primary cauline (38 on 27 plants)
secondary cauline (55 on 27 plants):





 71% contained shoots
 4% contained shoots


 3% contained leaves
 4% contained leaves


 26% empty
 92% empty










Mean total number of visible shoots = 3.4 +/− 0.6






We concluded that rev-1, rev-1011, and KO438 plants all exhibited a severe reduction in the development of secondary and higher order shoots compared to wild type at this flowering stage. Rev-1 and rev-1011 had a slightly stronger phenotype than KO438 based on the number of cauline leaves bearing shoots. The rev-1 and rev-1011 alleles had been isolated in a Nossen background. A batch of rev-1 were therefore grown alongside wild-type Nossen in continuous light conditions. The wild-type Nossen plants were noted to develop a similar architecture to the wild type Columbia plants in the previous experiment. The plants were examined at approximately 10 weeks after sowing in this second experiment. At this time rev-1 plants had 9.7+/−1.6 and Nossen wild type had 55+/−5 visible shoots. The additional shoots on the rev-1 plants at 10 weeks compared to 5 weeks were mainly axillary shoots that had grown out from the basal rosette. Only 2/61 of these rosette inflorescences had any side shoots.
To check whether G438 was the REVgene we isolated the G438 sequence from rev-1, rev-1011, wild type Columbia and wild type Nossen. The G438 sequence from rev-1 and rev-1011 were found to be identical, indicating that both were the same allele! These sequences exhibited eight single-base changes compared to that from wild type Nossen (and 9 differences compared to wild type Columbia, due to a single base polymorphism between Nossen and Columbia in the 5th intron). Of these eight changes, one was upstream of the putative start codon, four were present in putative introns, and two were present in the 3′ UTR. The final change was a G to A substitution predicted to disrupt the splice site at the junction between the eleventh intron and the twelfth exon. To confirm the intron-exon boundaries, the G438 cDNA sequence was isolated by PCR from cDNA derived from a mixture of tissues. The gene consisted of 18 exons, which were predicted to encode an 842 amino acid homeodomain leucine-zipper protein. The splice-site mutation in G438 from rev-1 was expected to prevent removal of the eleventh intron, resulting in an aberrant transcript.
The above result strongly suggested that G438 was REV gene. We therefore performed a genetic complementation test and crossed homozygotes for the KOG438 with rev-1 and rev-1011 homozygotes, and wild type plants. All 20 F1 plants from the cross to wild type had a wild-type phenotype. Twenty F1 plants from the KOG438×rev-1 population and 20 F1 plants from the KOG438×rev-1011 population all exhibited a revoluta phenotype. These data confirmed that G438 was the REV gene.
The T-DNA collection from which KOG438 was derived contained a GUS reporter gene construct. We stained heterozygous KOG438 plants with GUS to see whether a tissue specific expression pattern for G438 would be revealed. GUS staining was not noted in wild type controls at any stage. In seedlings containing KO438, no staining was seen before 3 days after sowing. From 5-8 days after sowing, strong staining was visible in the axils of rosette leaves in positions where secondary shoots were developing. Strong expression was not noted in the primary apex. These expression patterns correlate well with the enhanced deficiencies in axillary shoot development (compared to the primary shoot) in the rev mutant. It is possible that there is an increased requirement for REV in axillary shoots (compared to the primary) to ensure their proper initiation and outgrowth. GUS staining was also noted in the vascular tissue, roots (but not root tips), and in the stigmae and pedicels of flowers. (To verify that GUS staining was due to the T-DNA inserted in G438 and not some other background T-DNA, selfed seed was collected from F1 plants in the KO438× wt population. In the F2 population, 48 plants were resistant and 17 were sensitive to kanamycin. This 3:1 segregation suggested that the T-DNA was inserted at a single locus, i.e. within G438).
Shortly after we isolated the REV gene, the cloning of INTERFASCICULAR FIBERLESS1 (IFL1) was reported (Zhong et al. (1999) supra). IFL1 was found to be the same gene as REV, but had been studied independently and under a different name (Ratcliffe et al. (2000) supra). The salient feature of the ifl1 mutant was an absence of lignified interfascicular fiber cells in the stem (although it was noted to have features such as enlarged curled leaves). In wild type, these cells can be visualized by phloroglucinol staining, but are absent from the mutant (Zhong et al. (1997) supra). To examine whether these cells were absent, stem sections were cut from revoluta plants (F1 from the KOG438×rev-1 and KOG438×rev-1011 crosses) and wild type plants and stained with phloroglucinol. Lignified interfascicular fiber cells could be seen stained purple in the wild type but were absent from the revoluta mutants, confirming that rev has an ifl1 phenotype.
The finding that IFL1 is REVOLUTA might help explain the deficiencies in fiber differentiation in the mutant. Lignified fiber cells are essential in providing support for the plant stem, and are thought to develop in response to the polar auxin flow which originates at the shoot tips (Aloni (1987) supra; Zhong (1999) supra). IFL1 was proposed to act either by regulating polar auxin flow or by regulating the genes involved in the transduction of hormonal signals that trigger fiber differentiation. REVOLUTA is considered to be essential for apical meristem development. Since the auxin stream that induces fiber differentiation derives from shoots, it seems reasonable to suggest that defects in shoot meristem development would alter the polar auxin flow, and as a consequence, influence fiber differentiation. Thus, the interfascicular fiber-less phenotype of the rev mutant may be an indirect effect of the apical meristem deficiencies.
The precise role of REV still remains elusive. It has been suggested that REV promotes the growth of apical meristems (including floral meristems) at the expense of non-apical (cambial) meristems (Talbert et al. (1995) supra). It is not yet clear, however, whether expression data supports such a role: strong expression of REV has been detected in interfascicular regions and developing vascular tissue, but detailed in-situ expression analysis of apical meristems has not yet been reported (Zhong et al. (1999) supra). REV is a group III HD-ZIP protein and shares high sequence similarity (and organization) with the proteins encoded by three other Arabidopsis genes being studied: G392 (Athb8), G390 (Athb9), and G391 (Athb14) (Sessa et al. (1998) supra). It is possible, therefore, that these genes act together in the same developmental process. Supporting this suggestion, Athb8 has a similar expression pattern to REV and is transcribed in the procambial regions of vascular bundles (Baima et al. (1995) supra). Thus, to gain a full understanding of REV function and its contribution to plant architecture, it will be necessary to study the gene in conjunction with the other homologs. To further this aim we are now studying G438 alongside G392. A homozygous population of KOG392 plants has recently been obtained. The KOG392 plants display a wild-type morphology and exhibit a wild-type staining pattern with phloroglucinol. Crosses are now being made to obtain the KOG438; KOG392 double mutant. We are also in the process of producing overexpressors for G438 and G392. It is hoped that these studies will provide a greater understanding of the function of G438 and thereby allow us to engineer plants with a modified stem lignin content or altered patterns of branching.
RT-PCR analyses detected G438 expression at medium to high levels in all tissues and conditions tested. Further expression analysis was possible, however, since the T-DNA insertion contained an enhancer trap construct (Campisi et al. (1999) supra). GUS staining could therefore be used to reveal the expression pattern of genes within which insertions occurred. GUS staining of seedlings homozygous and heterozygous for the G438 T-DNA insertion revealed very strong expression within axillary shoots. This expression data has not yet been confirmed by other methods, but correlates with the marked effects of the rev mutation on outgrowth of higher order shoots.
Utilities
The mutant phenotypes indicate that REV/IFL1 has an important role in determining overall plant architecture and the distribution of lignified fiber cells within the stem. A number of utilities can be envisaged based upon these functions.
(1) Modification of Lignin Composition
Modifying the activity of REVOLUTA orthologs from tree species could offer the potential for modulating lignin content. This might allow the quality of wood used for furniture or construction to be improved.
(2) Modification of Plant Architecture
In Arabidopsis, reduced REV activity results in a reduction of higher-order shoot development. Reducing activity of REV orthologs might generate trees that lack side branches, and have fewer knots in the wood.
G485 (SEQ ID NO: 105)
Published Information
G485 is a member of the Hap3-like subfamily of CCAAT-box binding transcription factors. G485 corresponds to gene At4g14540, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. The gene corresponds to sequence 1042 from Patent Application WO0216655 on stress-regulated genes, transgenic plants and methods of use, in which G485 was reported to be cold responsive in a microarray analysis (Harper et al. (2002) Patent Application WO0216655). No information is available about the function(s) of G485.
Experimental Observations
RT-PCR analyses of the endogenous levels of G485 indicated that this gene is expressed in all tissues and under all conditions tested. Homozygotes for a T-DNA insertion allele of G485 flowered several days later than control plants. G485 was then overexpressed, and gain of function and loss of function studies on G485 revealed opposite effects on flowering time. Under conditions of continuous light, approximately half of the 35S::G485 primary transformants flowered distinctly up to a week earlier than wild-type controls. These effects were observed in each of two independent T1 plantings derived from separate transformation dates. These studies indicate that G485 acts as a floral activator and is also necessary in that role within the plant.
Utilities
Based on the loss of function and gain of function phenotypes, G485 or its orthologs could be used to modify flowering time.
The delayed flowering displayed by G485 knockouts indicated that the gene or its orthologs might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
The early flowering effects seen in the G485 overexpressors could be applied to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
G581 (SEQ ID) NO: 115)
Published Information
G581 was first identified as Atmyc1 by Urao et al. (1996) Plant Mol. Biol. 32: 571-576. It has been shown that its transcripts were more abundant in developing seeds than in stems and leaves. G581 contains a Sph box (CATGCATG) in its promoter region that is known as a cis-regulatory element conferring seed-specific expression. No other information regarding G581 function is available in the literature.
Experimental Observations
Using an RT-PCR-based approach, it was determined that G581 was uniformly expressed in all tissues tested, and the expression level was unchanged by all of the environmental conditions or pathogens infections tested.
The function of G581 was first studied by knockout analysis. Homozygous plants containing a T-DNA insertion within the first half of the G581 coding region displayed wild-type morphology at all developmental stages. Furthermore, G581 knockout mutant plants behaved similarly to wild type in all physiological and biochemical assays performed.
The function of G581 was also assessed by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the cDNA was constitutively expressed from the 35S CaMV promoter. Overexpression of G581 resulted in plants with alterations in seed coloration, and a mild delay in the onset of flowering. Seeds from 35S::G581 transgenic lines were pale and larger compared to wild-type controls. In addition, G581 overexpressing lines germinated better on plates containing low nitrogen or plates with low nitrogen supplemented with glutamine. Under such conditions, seedlings also had less measurable anthocyanin accumulation when compared to wild-type controls.
Utilities
The enhanced growth of G581 overexpression lines under low nitrogen conditions indicate that the gene could be used to engineer crops that could thrive under conditions of reduced nitrogen availability.
G581 could be used to alter anthocyanin production or accumulation. This could enhance the health benefits of foodstuffs, could be used to alter pigment production for horticultural purposes, or possibly increase resistance to a variety of stresses.
Additionally, the delayed flowering displayed by 35S::G581 transformants indicates that the gene might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
Given the effects of G581 overexpression, it is likely that the activity of the gene (or its orthologs) could also be modified to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
Finally, the changes in size and coloration shown by 35S::G581 seeds indicate that the gene might be used to enhance seed traits or yield.
G624 (SEQ ID NO: 119 and SEQ ID NO: 2105)
Published Information
G624 was identified in the sequence of BAC F18E5, GenBank accession number AL022603, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative.
Experimental Observations
Overexpression of G624 produced a moderate delay in the onset of flowering (approximately one week under continuous light conditions). A number of the late flowering 35S::G624 transformants also displayed a marked increase in vegetative biomass compared to controls. No altered phenotypes were detected in any of the physiological assays.
Intriguingly, overexpression lines containing a truncated form of the cDNA (SEQ ID NO: 2105) exhibited wild-type morphology but displayed enhanced tolerance to both high sodium chloride and low phosphate growth conditions. It is possible that this effect represents a dominant negative phenotype.
Utilities
The delayed flowering displayed by 35S::G624 transformants indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth or an increase in leaf size can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
Based on the increased salt tolerance exhibited by the 35S::G624 lines in physiology assays, this gene or its equivalogs might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in salinified soils, or under drought conditions.
The response of 35S::G624 seedlings to low phosphate conditions indicated that the gene or its equivalogs could be used to manipulate nutrient uptake or the ability to grow in poor nutrient soils.
G627 (SEQ ID NO: 121)
Published Information
G627 corresponds to AGAMOUS-LIKE 19 (AGL19) which was isolated by Alvarez-Buylla et al. (2000) Plant J. 24: 457-466. No genetic characterization of AGL19 has been reported, but it was found to be specifically expressed in the outer layers of the root meristem (lateral root cap and epidermis) and in the central cylinder cells of mature roots (Alvarez-Buylla et al. (2000), supra).
Experimental Observations
RT-PCR expression studies failed to detect G627 in any of the tissue types analyzed. This result partially agrees with the data of Alvarez-Buylla et al. (2000), supra, who found that the gene is expressed only in specific regions of the root. It is possible that such regions were not sufficiently represented, for G627 transcript to be detected in the whole root samples analyzed in expression studies. In later experiments, however, a G627 clone was isolated by high cycle PCR from a cDNA sample derived from mixed tissues, and transgenic lines were generated in which this clone was expressed from a 35S promoter.
A substantial proportion of the 35S::G627 lines flowered markedly earlier than control plants. Such effects were observed in both the T1 and T2 generations and indicate that the gene plays a role in the regulation of flowering time.
Utilities
Given the early flowering seen amongst the 35S::G627 transformants, the gene or its orthologs may be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, G627 could be used to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
G651 (SEQ ID NO: 125 and SEQ ID NO: 2106)
Published Information
G651 was identified in the sequence of BAC T7I23, GenBank accession number U89959, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. There is no other published or public information about G651.
Experimental Observations
The function of G651 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Two clones were used to determine the function of G651. One clone, P15159, contained no errors compared with the publicly annotated sequence. Another clone, P2812, lacked a glutamic acid residue at position 203 and was 3′ truncated, lacking the final 8 amino acids (SEQ ID NO: 2106). The conserved domains were present in both clones.
Equivalent morphological effects were observed in 35S::G651 lines containing either of the different overexpression constructs. Overexpression of G651 produced a number of alterations in Arabidopsis growth and development, including changes in leaf morphology, overall size, growth rate, and fertility. Leaves of 35S::G651 plants had a dark grayish appearance, were often contorted and had an abnormal undulated surface texture. It is possible that such features could reflect changes in leaf cuticle composition/deposition or alterations in the histology of the epidermis. 35S::G651 lines were generally small, slow developing, displayed retarded inflorescence outgrowth, and often had poorly developed flowers with multiple non-specific abnormalities.
G651 (P15159) overexpressing lines behave similarly to the wild-type controls in all physiological assays performed. However, in general, overexpression of G651 caused deleterious effects on plant growth. G651 seedlings were small and vitrified. One line also accumulated anthocyanins. G651 (P2812, comprising SEQ ID NO: 2106) overexpressing lines showed an additional effect and exhibited increased sensitivity to cold stress in a germination assay. Furthermore, 35S::G651 lines harboring P2812 displayed little or no secondary root growth.
Utilities
Depending on the basis of the color change seen in 35S::G651 lines, a number of applications could be envisaged. If the phenotype is due to loosening of epidermal cell layers, the gene or its equivalogs might be used to produce fruits, vegetables, and other plant products that can be more easily peeled. If the effects are due to changes in wax composition/accumulation, G651 or its equivalogs might be used to afford protection against pests or abiotic stresses such as drought. If, however, the phenotype is due to changes in pigment levels within the leaf, the gene or its equivalogs might be applied to alter photosynthetic capacity and yield.
The changes in root development seen in 35S::G651 lines indicated that the gene or its equivalogs could be used to manipulate root growth and thereby influence the uptake of water and nutrients.
The altered response to cold germination assays indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be applied to modify abiotic stress responses.
G652 (SEQ ID NO: 127)
Published Information
G652 (At1g14580) was identified in the sequence of BAC T5E21, GenBank accession number AC010657, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other Zinc CLDSH related proteins in Arabidopsis. 
G652 was described in the literature as atGRP2 (de Oliveira et al. (1990) Plant Cell. 2: 427-436). The authors describe atGRP2 as being rich in glycine and not induced by ethylene, abscisic acid, salicylic acid, water stress or drought. Kingsley and Palis (1994) Plant Cell 6: 1522-1523) noted that atGRP2 contains a cold shock domain and two zinc fingers.
Closely Related Genes from Other Species
G652 is glycine rich and shares homology with other GRP proteins found in plants in addition to the cold shock domain and zinc finger domain.
Experimental Observations
G652 appears to be constitutively expressed at medium levels in all tissues and environmental conditions tested as determined by RT-PCR analysis. Expression of G652 was not detected in other tissues. A line homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in G652 was used to determine the function of this gene. The T-DNA insertion of G652 is approximately 75% into the coding sequence of the gene and therefore is likely to result in a null mutation. Plants homozygous for a T-DNA insertions within G652 displayed a spectrum of developmental abnormalities, particularly at the early seedling stage. These phenotypes were variable within the population suggesting that other factors might be influencing the penetrance of the phenotype. For example, seedlings were small and filled with anthocyanins. Almost all the seedlings had defects in cotyledons ranging from unusual shape to fusions. Many seedlings did not survive. Those that did grew slowly. Fertility was reduced compared to controls, senescence delayed, and siliques were often rather short. The reason for this poor fertility was unclear. Many flowers had a reduced number of stamens (4-5 of these organs rather than 6). Interestingly, the absent stamen(s) were usually one or both of the shorter pair. Seeds produced by knockouts of G652 plants were somewhat wrinkled and misshapen.
The G652 knockout line had a reproducible increase in the leaf glucosinolate M39480. It also showed a reproducible increase in seed alpha-tocopherol. A decrease in seed oil as measured by NIR was also observed, but the values were slightly above the cutoff value for statistical significance.
The function of G652 was also studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G652 resulted in plants that were small and slow developing. Many plants died at an early stage of growth. The two lines that were morphologically examined in the T2 generation were small and showed premature senescence of rosette leaves.
Utilities
G652 could be used to manipulate seed tocopherol composition and seed structure and to alter glucosinolate composition in leaves. Tocopherols have anti-oxidant and vitamin E activity. Increases or decreases in specific glucosinolates or total glucosinolate content might be desirable depending upon the particular application. For example: (1) Glucosinolates are undesirable components of the oilseeds used in animal feed, since they produce toxic effects. Low-glucosinolate varieties of canola have been developed to combat this problem. (2) Some glucosinolates have anti-cancer activity; thus, increasing the levels or composition of these compounds might be of interest from a nutraceutical standpoint. (3) Glucosinolates form part of a plants natural defense against insects. Modification of glucosinolate composition or quantity could therefore afford increased protection from predators. Furthermore, in edible crops, tissue specific promoters might be used to ensure that these compounds accumulate specifically in tissues, such as the epidermis, which are not taken for consumption.
Based on the overexpression data, G652 could be used to manipulate plant growth and development. In particular, the accelerated senescence of the 35S::G652 lines indicates that the gene could be used to modify disease responses, or alter the rate of senescence in crops.
G807 (SEQ ID NO: 141)
Published Information
The heat shock transcription factor G807 is referred to in the public literature as the Arabidopsis HSF3, a class-A HSF characterized by an extended HR-A/B oligomerization domain (Nover et al. (1996) Cell Stress 1:215-223). G807 is found in the sequence of the chromosome 5 BAC clone F5E19 (GenBank accession number AL391147.1; nid=9755718), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. The translation start and stop codons were incorrectly predicted in the BAC annotation. Overexpression of the Arabidopsis HSF3 or HSF3-GUS fusion protein results in the constitutive expression of the heat shock proteins and in an increase in the basal thermotolerance in transgenic plants (Prandl et al. (1998) Mol. Gen. Genet. 258: 269-278).
Experimental Observations
RT-PCR analysis of the endogenous level of G807 transcripts revealed a moderate but constitutive level in all tissue examined. G807 transcript level increased moderately upon heat shock and auxin treatment, but decreased below detectable level following salt treatment. Analysis of a G807 null mutant reveals no apparent morphological, physiological or biochemical changes when compared to control plants.
The function of G807 was analyzed through its ectopic overexpression in Arabidopsis. A number of beneficial phenotypes were observed in the transgenic 35S::G807 overexpressor lines that have not been previously reported in the scientific literature. The seedling vigor was generally improved in primary T1 transformants and in the T2 progenies. Seedlings germinated on agar-MS plate under 12 hr light were reproducibly larger and showed longer hypocotyl than control plants. This phenotype was highly penetrant. The long petiole effect was observed in the primary transformants but was not apparent in any of the T2 progenies characterized.
Physiological analysis of 35S::G807 overexpressor lines revealed increased seedling vigor in a cold germination assay (MS-agar, 8° C., 3-15 days). Germinated seedlings were generally larger and accumulated less anthocyanin than control plants treated under the same conditions. This phenotype was observed in a primary screen using a mixed line population, as well as in repeated treatment with individual lines.
Utilities
Based on published data, G807 might be used to improve heat tolerance.
From the experimental studies performed by us, a number of other potential applications are apparent:
(1) G807 could be used to confer chilling tolerance
The growth of many crops is very sensitive to cool temperatures. A gene that enhances growth under chilling conditions could result in enhanced yields. For example, chilling may lead to yield losses and lower product quality through the delayed ripening of maize. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis (disruption of photosynthesis due to high light intensities) often occurs under clear atmospheric conditions subsequent to cold late summer/autumn nights. Another consequence of poor growth is the rather poor ground cover of maize fields in spring, often resulting in soil erosion, increased occurrence of weeds, and reduced uptake of nutrients. A retarded uptake of mineral nitrogen could lead to increased losses of nitrate into the ground water. Enhanced chilling tolerance could also extend the effective growth range of chilling sensitive crop species by allowing earlier planting or later harvest.
Chilling tolerance could also serve as a model for understanding how plants adapt to water deficit. Both chilling and water stress share similar signal transduction pathways and tolerance/adaptation mechanisms. For example, acclimation to chilling temperatures can be induced by water stress or treatment with abscisic acid. Genes induced by low temperature include dehydrins (or LEA proteins). Dehydrins are also induced by salinity, abscisic acid, water stress and during the late stages of embryogenesis.
Another large impact of chilling occurs during post-harvest storage. For example, some fruits and vegetables do not store well at low temperatures (for example, bananas, avocados, melons, and tomatoes). The normal ripening process of the tomato is impaired if it is exposed to cool temperatures. Genes conferring resistance to chilling temperatures may enhance tolerance during post-harvest storage.
(2) G807 could be used to accelerate seedling growth, and thereby allow a crop to become established faster. This would minimize exposure to stress conditions at early stages of growth, when the plants are most sensitive. Additionally, it might allow a crop to become grow faster than competing weed species.
(3) G807 might be used to manipulate light responses such as shade avoidance.
G839 (SEQ ID NO: 145)
Published Information
G839 was identified by amino acid sequence similarity to plant and mammalian ankyrin-repeat proteins. G839 is found in the sequence of the chromosome 5, TAC clone: K17O22 (GenBank accession number AB019224.1, nid=3869063), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. G839 has no other distinctive feature besides the presence of a 33-AA repeated ankyrin element known for protein-protein interaction, in the C-terminus of the predicted protein.
The G839 product is closely related to NPR1, a gene that controls the onset of systemic acquired resistance in plant (Cao et al. (1997) Cell 88:57-63; Cao et al. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 6531-6536). However, no information related to the functional characterization of G839 is currently available from the public literature.
Experimental Observations
RT-PCR studies revealed that G839 is expressed throughout the plant, with the lowest levels in germinating seedlings.
The function of G839 was analyzed through its ectopic overexpression in Arabidopsis; 35S::G839 lines displayed a delay in the onset of flowering (1-7 days), but were otherwise morphologically similar to wild-type control plants. In addition, 35S::G839 lines showed increased vigor and had more secondary root growth than controls when grown on plates containing low nitrogen.
Utilities
Nitrogen is the major nutrient affecting plant growth and development that ultimately impacts yield and stress tolerance. Plants of the G839 overexpressing lines grown under low nitrogen conditions were larger, showed enhanced primary and secondary root growth, and less chlorosis compared to the control plants. In some cases, twice as much root and shoot biomass was observed in the G839 transgenics plants when compared to a comparable wild-type plant, indicating that the gene or its orthologs could be used to engineer crops that could thrive under conditions of reduced nitrogen availability.
The delayed flowering in 35S::G839 lines indicated that the gene or its orthologs can manipulate flowering time. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
G916 (SEQ ID NO: 153)
Published Information
G916 corresponds to gene At4g04450, and it has also been described as WRKY42. No information is available about the function(s) of G916.
Experimental Observations
The complete cDNA sequence of G916 was experimentally determined. G916 appears to be expressed at low levels in a range of tissues, and was not significantly induced by any of the conditions tested.
A T-DNA insertion mutant for G916, displayed wild-type morphology. Overexpression of G916 produced a wide spectrum of developmental abnormalities in Arabidopsis. Many of the 35S::G916 seedlings were extremely tiny and showed an apparent lack of shoot organization. Such plants arrested growth and died at very early stages. Other individuals were small and displayed disproportionately long hypocotyls and narrow cotyledons. At later stages, the majority of surviving lines were markedly smaller than wild type, and formed rather weedy inflorescence stems that yielded very few flowers. Additionally, flowers often had poorly developed organs.
In addition, G916 overexpressing lines were larger than control wild-type seedlings in several germination assays. Larger seedlings were observed under conditions of high sucrose. In addition,
35S::G916 seedlings were larger and appeared to have less anthocyanin on high sucrose plates that were nitrogen deficient, with or without glutamine supplementation. The assays monitor the effect of C on N signaling through anthocyanin production. That 35S::G916 seedlings perform better under conditions of high sucrose alone makes it more difficult to interpret the better seedling performance under conditions of low nitrogen. Tissue specific or inducible expression of this gene could aid in sorting out the complex phenotypes caused by the constitutive overexpression of this gene.
G916 is related to two other WRKY genes, G184 and G186. Members of this clade could have redundant function in Arabidopsis. Overexpression of G184 caused a variety of morphological alterations, similar to those of the 35S::G916 seedlings. Similar to the G916 KO mutant, G186 single knockout mutant plants did not show phenotypic alterations in the analyses preformed.
Utilities
The enhanced performance of G916 overexpression lines under low nitrogen conditions indicate that the gene could be used to engineer crops that could thrive under conditions of reduced nitrogen availability.
That 35S::G916 lines make less anthocyanin on high sucrose plus glutamine, indicates G916 might be used to modify carbon and nitrogen status, and hence assimilate partitioning.
The results of physiological assays indicate that G916 could be used to alter the sugar signaling in plants. In addition to their important role as an energy source and structural component of the plant cell, sugars are central regulatory molecules that control several aspects of plant physiology, metabolism and development. It is thought that this control is achieved by regulating gene expression and, in higher plants, sugars have been shown to repress or activate plant genes involved in many essential processes such as photosynthesis, glyoxylate metabolism, respiration, starch and sucrose synthesis and degradation, pathogen response, wounding response, cell cycle regulation, pigmentation, flowering and senescence. The mechanisms by which sugars control gene expression are not understood.
Because sugars are important signaling molecules, the ability to control either the concentration of a signaling sugar or how the plant perceives or responds to a signaling sugar could be used to control plant development, physiology or metabolism. For example, the flux of sucrose (a sugar used for systemically transporting carbon and energy in most plants) has been shown to affect gene expression and alter storage compound accumulation in seeds. Manipulation of the sucrose signaling pathway in seeds may therefore cause seeds to have more protein, oil or carbohydrate, depending on the type of manipulation. Similarly, in tubers, sucrose is converted to starch that is used as an energy store. It is thought that sugar-signaling pathways may partially determine the levels of starch synthesized in the tubers. The manipulation of sugar signaling in tubers could lead to tubers with higher starch content.
Thus, manipulating the sugar signal transduction pathway may lead to altered gene expression to produce plants with desirable traits. In particular, manipulation of sugar signal transduction pathways could be used to alter source-sink relationships in seeds, tubers, roots and other storage organs leading to increase in yield.
Additionally, the morphological phenotypes shown by 35S::G916 seedlings indicate that the gene might be used to manipulate light responses such as shade avoidance.
G926 (SEQ ID NO: 155)
Published Information
G926 is equivalent to Hap2a (Y13720), a member of the CCAAT-box binding transcription factor family. The gene was identified by Edwards et al. ((1998) Plant Physiol. 117: 1015-1022). They showed that G926 or AtHap2a was able to functionally complement a Hap2 deficient mutant of yeast indicating that there is functional conservation between these proteins from diverse organisms. In addition, the AtHap2a gene was shown to be ubiquitously expressed in Arabidopsis. No functional information, however, was published for this gene.
Closely Related Genes from Other Species
G926 is most closely related to a Brassica napus protein (AAC49265). Similarity between the two proteins extends beyond the signature motif of the family to a level that would indicate the genes are orthologous. No functional information is available for the Brassica napus protein.
Experimental Observations
Consistent with the published expression pattern (Edwards et al. (1998) supra), G926 was determined to be ubiquitously expressed and transcript levels appeared to be unaltered by any environmental stress-related condition tested. A line homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in G926 was used to determine the function of this gene.
The G926 knockout mutant line was morphologically wild-type. Physiological analysis revealed that in the presumed absence of G926 function, the plants became more tolerant to high osmotic conditions during germination. This osmotic stress tolerance could be related to the plant's apparent insensitivity to the growth hormone ABA. This was the second instance where a member of a CCAAT-box protein complex altered the plants osmotic stress response and ABA sensitivity during germination. G926 and G1820 may function as part of the same complex or as part of the same or parallel signal transduction pathways.
G926 overexpressing plants were significantly greener and larger than wild-type control plants in a soil-based drought assay.
ABA plays an important regulatory role in the initiation and maintenance of seed dormancy. Lopez-Molina, L. et al. ((2001)) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98:4782-4787) described a bZIP transcription factor, AB15, that is involved in maintaining seeds in a quiescent state, preventing germination under adverse conditions such as drought stress. It is possible G926 also functions as part of this checkpoint for the germinating seeds and loss of G926 function promotes germination regardless of the osmotic status of the environment.
Utilities
G926 or its equivalogs could be used to improve plant tolerance to drought and salt stress.
G961 (SEQ ID NO: 159)
Published Information
G961 was first identified in the sequence of the BAC clone F19D11, GenBank accession number AC005310, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative.
Closely Related Genes from Other Species
A rice gene, GenBank accession number BAA84803, appears to be a gene that is related to G961.
Experimental Observations, knockout plants
The function of this gene was analyzed by knockout analysis. Homozygotes for a T-DNA insertion within G961 exhibited comparable morphology to wild type controls. However, these plants had altered seed oil content.
Experimental Observations overexpressors
Gene expression profiling by RT-PCR shows that G961 is primarily expressed in shoots, embryos and siliques at medium levels, and at low levels in flowers. RT-PCR data also indicates an induction of G961 transcript accumulation upon heat treatment.
35S::G961 Arabidopsis lines were generated, with which it was determined that overexpression of G961 produced marked changes in fertility and seed morphology. 35S::G961 transformants appeared wild-type at early stages of development, but following the switch to flowering, the majority of lines exhibited very poor fertility. Seeds from these plants frequently aborted and failed to mature. As a result of such deficiencies, the majority of the lines yielded very few seeds. The seeds that were obtained exhibited some striking differences in morphology compared to wild type controls; seed coloration was dark and white patches were visible on the seed coat, particularly at the tip near the micropyle. In some instances, it appeared as though the seeds might be germinating precociously. Aside from the poor germination efficiency observed for one of the G961 transgenic lines, no consistent differences were observed between G961 transgenics and the controls in the physiology assays.
Utilities
Based on the knock-out and overexpression phenotypes, G961 or its equivalogs might be used to manipulate oil and protein content of seeds. In particular, the changes in morphology and coloration shown by 35S::G961 seeds indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to enhance seed traits or yield.
G975 (SEQ ID NO: 161)
Published Information
After its discovery by us, G975 has appeared in the sequences released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (BAC F9L1, GenBank accession number AC007591).
Closely Related Genes from Other Species
The non-Arabidopsis gene most highly related to G975 (as detected in BLAST searches, 11-5-99) is represented by L46408 BNAF1258 Mustard flower buds Brassica rapa cDNA clone F1258. The similarity between G975 and the Brassica rapa gene represented by EST L46408 extends beyond the conserved AP2 domain that characterizes the AP2/EREBP family. In fact, this Brassica rapa gene appears to be more closely related to G975 than Arabidopsis G1387, indicating that EST L46408 may represent a true G975 ortholog. The similarity between G975 and Arabidopsis G1387 also extends beyond the conserved AP2 domain.
Experimental Observations
G975 was discovered by us and is a new member of the AP2/EREBP family (EREBP subfamily) of transcription factors. G975 is expressed in flowers and, at lower levels, in shoots, leaves, and siliques. GC-FID and GC-MS analyses of leaves from G975 overexpressing plants have shown that the levels of C29, C31, and C33 alkanes were substantially increased (up to 10-fold) compared to control plants. A number of additional compounds of similar molecular weight, presumably also wax components, also accumulated to significantly higher levels in G975 overexpressing plants. Although total amounts of wax in G975 overexpressing plants have not yet been measured, C29 alkanes constitute close to 50% of the wax content in wild-type plants (Millar et al. (1998) Plant Cell 11: 1889-1902), indicating that a major increase in total wax content occurs in these transgenic plants. However, the transgenic plants had an almost normal phenotype (small morphological differences are detected in leaf appearance), indicating that overexpression of G975 is not deleterious to the plant. It is noteworthy that overexpression of G975 did not cause the dramatic alterations in plant morphology that have been reported for Arabidopsis plants in which the FATTY ACID ELONGATION1 gene was overexpressed (Millar et al. (1998) supra). G975 could specifically regulate the expression of some of the genes involved in wax metabolism. One Arabidopsis AP2 gene was found that is significantly more closely related to G975 than the rest of the members of the AP2/EREBP family. This other gene, G1387, may have a function, and therefore a utility, related to that of G975.
Plants overexpressing G975 were significantly larger and greener than wild-type control plants in a soil-based drought assay.
Utilities
G975 or its equivalogs could be used to improve a plant's tolerance to drought or low water conditions.
G975 or its equivalogs could be used to manipulate wax composition, amount, or distribution, which in turn could modify plant tolerance to drought and/or low humidity or resistance to insects, as well as plant appearance (shiny leaves). A possible application for this gene or its equivalogs might be in reducing the wax coating on sunflower seeds (the wax fouls the oil extraction system during sunflower seed processing for oil). For this purpose, antisense or co-suppression of the gene in a tissue specific manner might be useful.
G975 could also be used to specifically alter wax composition, amount, or distribution in those plants and crops from which wax is a valuable product.
G1011 (SEQ ID NO: 163)
Published Information
G1011 was identified in the sequence of P1 clone MTG10 (gene MTG10.20, GenBank accession number BAB10179.1). No information is available about the function(s) of G1011.
Experimental Observations
The complete cDNA sequence of G1011 was determined, and the initial BAC annotation in GenBank was found to be incorrect. The G1011 cDNA sequence has now been confirmed by a number of full-length cDNA sequences, which have recently been deposited in GenBank.
G1011 function was examined via analysis of a T-DNA insertion mutant for the gene. However, plants that were homozygous for this insertion displayed a wild-type phenotype in all assays performed. Additionally, RT-PCR studies on wild-type plants revealed G1011 expression to be ubiquitously expressed at low levels in a range of tissues.
We have now assessed the role of G1011 by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the gene was overexpressed. 35S::G1011 transformants appeared wild-type in the physiology assays, but did displayed a number of interesting developmental changes during the morphological assays. First, around half of the lines were markedly early flowering. Such effects were observed under either inductive (24-hour light) or non-inductive (12-hour light) photoperiodic conditions, indicating that G1011 might have a central role in determining the timing of the floral transition. Interestingly, under 12-hour light conditions, the lines also developed shorter, more rounded leaves than wild type, but this was not seen under continuous light.
As well as the effects on flowering time, many of the 35S::G1011 lines displayed alterations in flower morphology; floral organs often had alterations in shape or number and petals were rather narrow and green. In particular, it was noted that floral organ abscission was somewhat delayed compared to wild-type flowers, with stamens, petals, and sepals persisting following pollination. It is noteworthy that Ferrandiz et al. ((2000) Plant Cell 12, 183-198) reported similar phenotypes as a result of overexpression of another MADS gene, AGL15.
Utilities
Based on the phenotypes observed in morphological assays, G1011 could have a number of applications.
Given its effects on the floral transition, G1011 might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, the gene could be use to accelerate flowering or to eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
The effects on flower morphology are also of commercial interest. G1011 might be used to modify flower development, in order to change form of flowers and fruits. This could create attractive new varieties or be used to influence pollination efficiency. The persistence of outer whorl organs following pollination is also of interest; such a trait could be applied to ornamental plants to prolong the life of blooms.
G1013 (SEQ ID NO: 165)
Published Information
G1013 (At5g43290) is a novel member of the WRKY family of transcription factors. No information is available about the function(s) of G1013.
Experimental Observations
RT-PCR analysis was used to look at the endogenous expression of G1013. Expression of the gene was only detected in floral tissues. It does not appear to be induced by any of the conditions tested.
Homozygous plants were analyzed for a T-DNA insertion within G1013 and found that they showed wild-type morphology at all developmental stages.
The effects of G1013 overexpression were studied. In an assay intended to determine whether the transgene expression could alter C:N sensing, 35S::G1013 seedlings contained less anthocyanins than wild-type controls grown on high sucrose/N-plates. Seedlings were also greener than the wild-type controls on high sucrose/N-/Gln plates. These data together indicate that overexpression of G1013 alters a plant's ability to modulate carbon and/or nitrogen uptake and utilization.
G1013 overexpression also had an effect on plant morphology. 35S::G1013 lines exhibited narrow downward curled leaves, which were sometimes held in a more upright orientation than those of wild type at early stages of growth. Plants from the two T2 lines grown under continuous light also flowered late. In addition to the effects on leaf shape, many lines were slightly smaller than controls, and a few showed sporadic defects in flower development.
Utilities
On the basis of the available analytical data, there are several potential applications for 61013:
(1) the gene or its orthologs could be used to alter plant leaf morphology;
(2) the observation that 35S::G1013 lines make less anthocyanin on high sucrose plus glutamine, indicated G1013 or its orthologs might be used to modify carbon and nitrogen status, and hence assimilate partitioning. The enhanced performance of G1013 overexpression lines under low nitrogen conditions indicate that the gene could be used to engineer crops that could thrive under conditions of reduced nitrogen availability.
(3) the promoter of G1013 could be used to drive floral specific expression in planta.
G1037 (SEQ ID NO: 171 and SEQ ID NO: 2108)
Published Information
G1037 was identified in the sequence of BAC MUJ8, GenBank accession number AB028621, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. G1037 has been named ARR12 (Hwang et al. (2002) Plant Physiol. 129: 500-515). G1037 was identified in the sequence of BAC F13D4, GenBank accession number AL031369, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. This BAC has since been removed from GenBank, and currently the genomic sequence is not present. G1037 corresponds to the TAIR locus AT2G25180. It is cited in the patent publication WO0216655 concerning stress-regulated genes (Harper et al. (2002)).
Closely Related Genes from Other Species
Several genes with strong similarity to G1037 are present in other species. The most closely related are a putative response regulator from maize (AB062095) and a Brassica oleracea gene represented by genomic clone BH007675. No further information is available about these genes.
Experimental Observations
G1037 is a member of the response regulator class of GARP proteins. G1037 was found to be expressed throughout the plant, with highest expression in roots. It may be induced by auxin, ABA, heat, salt, and salicylic acid treatments.
A line homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in G1037 was used to determine the function of this gene. The T-DNA insertion of G1037 was determined to be approximately one third of the way into the coding sequence of the gene, within the conserved GARP domain, and therefore was likely to result in a null mutation. Plants homozygous for the T-DNA insertion showed somewhat inconsistent changes in flowering time. In one experiment, two different populations of G1037 knockout plants were markedly early flowering. However, in a second experiment, only a proportion of the plants showed early flowering, and this phenotype was marginal. It is possible that the effects of a G1037 mutation on flowering time are dependent on environmental conditions. No altered phenotypes of G1037 knockout plants were detected in any of the physiological or biochemical assays.
The function of this gene has also been analyzed using transgenic plants in which G1037 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. It should be noted that the clone contained sequence differences (SEQ ID NO: 2108) from the public BAC sequence (SEQ ID NO: 171). Two 35S::G1037 lines showed more tolerance to salt stress in a germination assay. All 35S::G1037 lines showed wild-type morphology.
Because several members of the response regulator class of GARP genes have been implicated in cytokinin signaling, it is possible that the improved seedling growth noted on salt results from changes in hormone response pathways.
Utilities
G1037 or its equivalogs may be useful for alteration of flowering time in crop plants.
G1037 or its equivalogs may be useful for engineering salt tolerance. The salt tolerance of G1037 seedlings may also indicate a general increase in tolerance to osmotic stress, indicating a potential use for G1037 or its equivalogs in engineering drought tolerance.
G1128 (SEQ ID NO: 181)
Published Information
The sequence of G1128 was obtained from the Arabidopsis genome sequencing project, GenBank accession number AB018109, based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other AT-Hook related proteins in Arabidopsis. 
Experimental Observations
Gene expression profiling using RT/PCR shows that G1128 is predominantly expressed in roots and flowers. Its expression appears to be not induced by any treatments tested.
Previously, the function of this gene was studied by knockout analysis. Plants homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in G1128 were wild type for all assays performed. It should be pointed out that the functional knockout analysis for AT-Hook proteins has not provided useful information so far, as was the case for G280 and G1945. One of reasons could be that there is functional redundancy among some of AT-Hook proteins. In fact, G1128 protein shares a significant homology to one other AT-Hook protein G1399.
The function of G1128 was also studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G1128 in Arabidopsis produced a wide range of morphological changes including stunted growth, and alterations in leaf and flower development. Analysis of G1128 overexpressors reveals no apparent physiological changes when compared to wild-type control plants.
Utilities
Based on the effects of G1128 overexpression, the gene could be used to manipulate plant growth and development. In particular, the accelerated senescence of the 35S::G1128 lines indicates that the gene could be used to modify disease responses, or alter the rate of senescence in crops. Additionally, if the dark coloration of 35S::G1128 lines reflects an increase in biochemical composition, the gene might be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield.
G1142 (SEQ ID NO: 185)
Published Information
The sequence of G1142 was obtained from the Arabidopsis genome sequencing project (within clone T3K9, GenBank accession number AC004261), based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other bHLH related proteins in Arabidopsis. 
Experimental Observations
RT-PCR analysis indicated that G1142 is ubiquitously expressed. The function of this gene was first studied by knockout analysis. Homozygous plants carrying a T-DNA insertion in G1142 flowered slightly earlier than wild-type controls under continuous conditions light. This phenotype was observed in two independently grown populations of KO.G1142 plants. G1142 knock-out plants were otherwise identical to their wild-type counterparts in all physiological and biochemical assays.
The function of G1142 has now been assessed by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the cDNA was constitutively expressed from the 35S CaMV promoter. Under continuous light, 35S::G1142 transformants displayed narrow leaves and flowered approximately 5-7 days later than wild-type controls. However, G1142 overexpressing lines behaved similarly to the wild-type controls in all physiological assays performed.
Utilities
Based on the analysis of G1142 knock-out plants as well as 35S::G1142 transgenic lines, G1142 or its orthologs can be used to manipulate flowering time in commercial species.
The delayed flowering displayed by 35S::G1142 transformants indicated that the gene or its orthologs might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
Given the early flowering seen in the G1142 null mutant, it is likely that the activity of G1142 or its orthologs can accelerate flowering or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
The changes in leaf shape in 35S::G1142 lines also indicate that the gene or its orthologs can be used to modify plant architecture.
G1206 (SEQ ID NO: 189)
Published Information
G1206 was identified by amino acid sequence similarity to the pea early nodulin gene-binding protein 1 (ENBP1), which binds to an AT-rich sequence motif within the promoter of the early nodulin gene ENOD12 (Christiansen et al., (1996) Plant Mol. Biol. 32:809-821). G1206 is in chromosome 1, BAC F24O1 (GenBank accession AC003113.2 GI:7658296), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. The translational start and stop codons were correctly predicted. No public information related to the functional characterization of G1206 has been published or made available.
Experimental Observations
An analysis of the endogenous levels of G1206 transcripts by RT-PCR revealed a constitutive expression in all tissues tested. No change in G1206 expression was observed in the biotic and abiotic treatments examined. A line homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in G1206 was used to determine the function of this gene. The characterization of the G1206 null mutant showed no apparent morphological, physiological or biochemical changes when compared to control plants.
The function of G1206 was also analyzed through its ectopic overexpression in plants. Physiological analysis of 35S::G1206 overexpressor lines revealed increased seedling vigor under drought conditions. Seedlings were generally larger and greener than the control plants treated with the same conditions.
Utilities
The reduced sensitivity of 35S::G1206 lines in the dehydration stress assay indicates that the gene might be used to engineer crops with increased tolerance to drought, salt, freezing and chilling stress, or increased water use efficiency.
G1274 (SEQ ID NO: 193)
Published Information
G1274 is a member of the WRKY family of transcription factors. The gene corresponds to WRKY51 (At5g64810). No information is available about the function(s) of G1274.
Experimental Observations
RT-PCR analysis was used to determine the endogenous expression pattern of G1274. Expression of G1274 was detected in leaf, root and flower tissues. The biotic stress related conditions, Erysiphe and SA induced expression of G1274 in leaf tissue. The gene also appeared to be slightly induced by osmotic and cold stress treatments and perhaps by auxin.
The function of G1274 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. G1274 overexpressing lines were more tolerant to growth on low nitrogen containing media. In an assay intended to determine whether the transgene expression could alter C/N sensing, 35S::G1274 seedlings contained less anthocyanins (FIG. 5A) than wild-type controls (FIG. 5B) grown on high sucrose/N- and high sucrose/N/Gln plates. These data together indicated that overexpression of G1274 may alter a plant's ability to modulate carbon and/or nitrogen uptake and utilization.
G1274 overexpression and wild-type germination were also compared in a cold germination assay, the overexpressors appearing larger and greener (FIG. 5C) than the controls (FIG. 5D).
FIGS. 6A-6D compare soil-based drought assays for G1274 overexpressors and wild-type control plants, which confirms the results predicted after the performance of the plate-based osmotic stress assays. 35S::G1274 lines fared much better after a period of water deprivation (FIG. 6A) than control plants in (FIG. 6B). This distinction was particularly evident in the overexpressor plants after once again being watered, said plants almost all fully recovered to a healthy and vigorous state in FIG. 6C. Conversely, none of the wild-type plants seen in FIG. 6D recovered after rewatering, as it was apparently too late for rehydration to rescue these plants.
In addition, 35S::G1274 transgenic plants were more tolerant to chilling compared to the wild-type controls, in both germination as well as seedling growth assays. 35S::G1274 overexpression plants were significantly greener and larger than wild-type control plants in a soil-based drought assay.
Overexpression of G1274 produced alterations in leaf morphology and inflorescence architecture. Four out of eighteen 35S::G1274 primary transformants were slightly small and developed inflorescences that were short, and showed reduced internode elongation, leading to a bushier, more compact stature than in wild-type.
In an experiment using T2 populations, it was observed that the rosette leaves from many of the plants were distinctly broad and appeared to have a greater rosette biomass than in wild type.
A similar inflorescence phenotype was obtained from overexpression of a potentially related WRKY gene, G1275. However, G1275 also caused extreme dwarfing, which was not apparent when G1274 was overexpressed.
Utilities
The phenotypic effects of G1274 overexpression could have several potential applications:
The enhanced performance of 35S::G1274 plants in a soil-based drought assay indicated that the gene or its equivalogs may be used to enhance drought tolerance in plants.
The enhanced performance of 35S::G1274 seedlings under chilling conditions indicates that the gene or its equivalogs might be applied to engineer crops that show better growth under cold conditions.
The morphological phenotype shown by 35S::G1274 lines indicate that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to alter inflorescence architecture, to produce more compact dwarf forms that might afford yield benefits.
The effects on leaf size that were observed as a result of G1274 or equivalog overexpression might also have commercial applications. Increased leaf size, or an extended period of leaf growth, could increase photosynthetic capacity, and biomass, and have a positive effect on yield.
G1276 (SEQ ID NO: 195)
Published Information
G1276 (At5g60120) was identified as part of P1 clone: MG03 (GenBank accession AB019231).
Experimental Observations
G1276 was found to be expressed ubiquitously in Arabidopsis. The function of this gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which a G1276 cDNA clone was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G1276 in Arabidopsis delayed the onset of flowering by up to 2-3 weeks under continuous light conditions. No consistent differences were observed between the 35S::G1276 transgenics and the wild-type control plants in any of the physiology assays.
It is noteworthy that G1276 is a potential paralog of APETALA2 (G2) and that a number of genes from the G2 clade produced delayed flowering when overexpressed.
Utilities
The delayed flowering displayed by 35S::G1276 transformants indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. Given the effects of G1276 overexpression, it is likely that the activity of the gene or its equivalogs could be modified to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
G1313 (SEQ ID NO: 199)
Published Information
G1313 (At5g06100) corresponds to AtMYB33. Gocal et al. ((2001) Plant Physiol. 127: 1682-1693) showed that G1313 (AtMYB33) could bind to the GA (gibberellin) response element and activate the barley alpha-amylase promoter in a transient assay in barley aleurone cells. The gene was ubiquitously expressed in Arabidopsis. It was hypothesized that the gene could regulate GA responsive pathways that promote flowering in Arabidopsis. To test this hypothesis, Gocal et al. (supra) analyzed that whether AtMYB33 was capable of binding to the LFY gene promoter. LFY is a floral meristem identity gene that has a GA responsive element in its promoter. AtMYB33 was found to bind to the LFY promoter suggesting that the action of gibberellins on flowering could be mediated through the activity of AtMYB33 (Gocal et al. supra).
Experimental Observations
The complete sequence of G1313 was determined. The function of this gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which G1313 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. 35S::G1313 transgenics were wild-type in response to all physiological stress treatments performed.
Overexpression of G1313 produced an increase in seedling vigor in some of the T1 plants at an early seedling stage under normal growth conditions compared to the wild-type controls; transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings were up to two-fold larger than the wild-type seedlings at early stages of development. Given that gibberellins are known to promote seed germination, the increased seedling vigor may be related to a GA response in seeds. The lack on an effect of G1313 on flowering time may result from the fact that an additional factor is required for the activity of the protein. All assays were performed under continuous light.
Utilities
The increase in seedling vigor in G1313 transgenics plants indicated this gene or its orthologs could be used to increased survivability and vigor of small seedlings under field conditions potentially leading to a greater yield in crops. Published results indicate that the gene might modify a plant's response to the growth regulator gibberellic acid (Gocal et al. supra).
G1357 (SEQ ID NO: 207)
Published Information
G1357 corresponds to gene At3g44290, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information is available about the function(s) of G1357.
Experimental Observations
The complete sequence of G1357 was experimentally determined. G1357 expression was not detected in wild-type plants under our experimental conditions. The function of this gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which G1357 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter.
35S::G1357 seedlings were more tolerant to chilling stress in a growth assay and insensitive to ABA in a germination assay. Morphologically, overexpression of G1357 in Arabidopsis produced alterations in coloration, leaf shape, and a marked delay in the time to flowering. At the earliest stages, G1357 seedlings appeared normal, but towards the mid-rosette stage, the plants developed a darker green coloration and the leaves became slightly rounder than those of wild-type. Additionally, many lines were also slightly smaller than controls. The majority of lines produced flower buds markedly late, with the most severely affected individuals flowering approximately 1 month later than wild type under continuous light conditions.
In a soil based drought assay, G1357 overexpressing plants were significantly greener and larger than wild-type control plants.
It should be noted that a highly related gene, G1452 (analyzed in phase I) had similar endogenous expression patterns, and produced similar effects on coloration, leaf shape, flowering time, abiotic stress resistance, and ABA sensitivity.
Utilities
The results of physiological assays indicated that G1357 gene or its equivalogs could be used to improve a plant's tolerance to chilling stress and drought.
Enhanced chilling tolerance could also extend the effective growth range of chilling sensitive crop species by allowing earlier planting or later harvest.
The delayed flowering displayed by 35S::G1357 transformants indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
Given the effects of G1357 overexpression, it is likely that the activity of the gene or its equivalogs could be modified to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
Additionally, if the dark coloration of 35S::G1357 lines reflects an increase in biochemical composition, this gene or its equivalogs might be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield.
G1412 (SEQ ID NO: 215)
Published Information
G1412 is a member of the NAC family of transcription factors. G1412 was identified in the sequence of BAC clone F27G19, GenBank accession number AL078467, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. G1412 also corresponds to gene At4g27410, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, and to sequence 1543 from patent publication WO0216655 A2 on stress-regulated genes, transgenic plants and methods of use. In the latter publication, G1412 was reported to be cold, osmotic and salt responsive in microarray analysis. No information is available about the function(s) of G1412.
Closely Related Genes from Other Species
G1412 is very similar in sequence to LEJA2 from tomato that is regulated by jasmonic acid. The level of sequence homology between these two proteins is significant enough to indicate they could have similar functions in the plant.
Experimental Observations
RT-PCR was used to analyze the endogenous expression pattern of G1412. G1412 appears to be constitutively expressed in all tissues tested. G1412 induction was observed in response to ABA, heat, drought, mannitol and Erysiphe, indicating the gene's expression is regulated by environmental conditions.
A T-DNA insertion mutant for G1412 was analyzed. The mutant displayed a wild-type morphology, and was wild-type in its response to the physiological analyses that were performed.
The effects of G1412 overexpression were also studied; the transformants displayed wild-type morphology. However, the 35S::G1412 transgenics were insensitive to ABA and were more tolerant to osmotic stress in a germination assay on media containing high concentrations of sucrose.
Utilities
The phenotypic effects of G1412 overexpression, such as the increase in seedling vigor observed in a germination assay on high sucrose media and insensitivity to germination on ABA media, indicated that the gene or its equivalogs could be used to engineer plants with increased tolerance to abiotic stresses such as drought, salt, heat or cold.
G1420 (SEQ ID NO: 217)
Published Information
G1420 corresponds to gene AT5g49520, and it has also been described as WRKY48. No information is available about the function(s) of G1420.
Experimental Observations
G1420 is ubiquitously expressed in Arabidopsis and does not appear to be significantly induced by any of the conditions tested.
A T-DNA insertion mutant for G1420 was analyzed, and the mutant was phenotypically wild-type.
We have now generated 35S::G1420 lines. Overexpression of the gene in Arabidopsis produced marked alterations in the morphology of leaves and floral organs. 35S::G1420 seedlings typically displayed rather long narrow cotyledons. Later, the plants formed leaves that were often mildly serrated, narrow, slightly dark green, and rather contorted. Additionally many of the lines showed stunted growth and appeared markedly smaller than controls. Following the switch to reproductive growth, 35S::G1420 transformants developed rather thin spindly inflorescences. Flowers were often borne on particularly long pedicels, and floral organs, especially sepals and petals, were long, narrow and twisted in a comparable manner to the leaves. As a result of the reduced size, and floral abnormalities, the seed yield from most of the lines was very poor.
In addition to the developmental alterations produced as a consequence of G1420 overexpression, the 35S::G1420 seedlings displayed a sugar sensing phenotype in a germination assay on media containing high glucose.
Utilities
The results of physiological assays indicate that G1420 could be used to alter the sugar signaling in plants.
The effects of G1420 on plant development indicate that the gene could be used to manipulate architecture. In particular, the gene could be used to generate novel leaf and flower forms for the ornamental markets. Additionally, if the dark coloration of 35S::G1420 lines reflects an increase in biochemical composition, the gene might be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield.
G1451 (SEQ ID NO: 223)
Published Information
1451 is ARF8, a member of the ARF class of proteins with a VP1-like N-terminal domain and a C-terminal domain with homology to Aux/IAA proteins. ARF8, like several other ARFs, contains a glutamine-rich central domain that can function as a transcriptional activation domain (Ulmasov et al. (1999a) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 5844-5849). ARF8 was shown to bind to an auxin response element (Ulmasov et al. (1999b) Plant J. 19: 309-319). It was also shown that a truncated version of ARF8 lacking the DNA binding domain but containing the activation domain and the C-terminal domain could activate transcription on an auxin responsive promoter, presumably through interactions with another factor bound to the auxin response element (Ulmasov et al. 1999a, supra). ARF8 is closely related in sequence to ARF6 (Ulmasov et al. 1999b, supra).
Experimental Observations
A line homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in G1451 exhibited a change in seed oil content. RT-PCR studies revealed that G1451 was expressed throughout the plant, with the highest expression in flowers. Transcripts of G1451 were induced in leaves by a variety of stress conditions.
The function of G1451 was analyzed using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G1451 produced changes in leaf morphology and a general increase in the vegetative biomass of Arabidopsis plants. At early stages, 35S::G1451 transformants appeared normal. However, towards the end of the rosette phase, leaves became distinctly broader and longer than wild type leaves. Many of the plants showing this phenotype also exhibited a mild delay in the onset of flowering.
Utilities
G1451 or its orthologs can be used to increase plant biomass, thus improving yield. Additionally, the delay in flowering observed in some of the 35S::G1451 lines indicated that the gene might be used to manipulate the timing of reproductive growth.
G1452 (SEQ ID NO: 225)
Published Information
G1452 was identified in the sequence of clones T22013, F12K2 with accession number AC006233 released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information is available about the function(s) of G1452.
Experimental Observations
The function of G1452 was analyzed using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G1452 produced changes in leaf development and markedly delayed the onset of flowering. 35S::G1452 plants produced dark green, flat, rounded leaves, and typically formed flower buds between 2 and 14 days later than controls. Additionally, some of the transformants were noted to have low trichome density on leaves and stems. At later stages of life cycle, 35S::G1452 plants developed more slowly and senesced considerably later than wild-type controls. In addition, G1452 overexpressors were more tolerant to osmotic stress, and were insensitive to ABA in separate germination assays.
G1452 expression was not detected in any tissue tested by RT-PCR and was not induced by any environmental stress-related condition tested.
Utilities
On the basis of the analyses performed to date, G1452 or its equivalogs could be use to alter plant growth and development. In addition, G1452 or its equivalogs could be used to alter a plant's response to water deficit conditions and therefore, could be used to engineer plants with enhanced tolerance to drought and salt stress.
G1468 (SEQ ID NO: 227)
Published Information
The genomic sequence of G1468 is located on the Arabidopsis BAC clone T7123 (GenBank accession number U89959).
Experimental Observations
G1468 was predominantly expressed in flowers and embryos.
A line homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in G1468 was used to determine the function of this gene. The T-DNA insertion of G1468 was found to be within the first third of the coding sequence of the gene and therefore was likely to result in a null mutation. Furthermore, its expression level was unaffected by any of the conditions tested. G1468 knockout mutant plants behaved similarly to wild-type plants in all assays performed.
The function of G1468 was also studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G1468 produced plants that were very tiny and rather dark in coloration compared to wild type controls at early stages. Severely affected individuals arrested growth early in vegetative development. Plants that survived formed narrow, gray leaves and showed a marked delay in the onset of flowering. Many of the late flowering plants had more axillary rosette leaves compared to controls leading to an increase in vegetative biomass.
Utilities
The alterations in leaf shape, size, and coloration shown by 35S::G1468 transformants indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be applied to modify plant architecture.
The delayed bolting indicated that gene or its equivalogs might also be used to manipulate flowering time in commercial species. Conversely, it is possible that the activity of G1468 or its equivalogs could be modified to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
G1476 (SEQ ID NO: 231)
Published Information
G1476 (At5g43540) was identified in the sequence of TAC clone K9D7 (GenBank accession number AB016875) based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other C2H2 related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about the function of G1476.
Experimental Observations
G1476 is expressed in roots, flowers, embryos and germinating seeds.
The function of G1476 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G1476 produced highly deleterious effects on growth and development. At early stages, while on media, 35S::G1476 seedlings appeared to grow more rapidly than controls.
Utilities
Based on the effects of its overexpression, G1476 could be used to regulate plant growth and development.
G1482 (SEQ ID NO: 233)
Published Information
G1482 was identified as a gene in the sequence of BAC F10A5, GenBank accession number AC006434, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. There is no other published or public information about G1482.
Experimental Observations
The sequence of G1482 was experimentally determined. Homozygous plants harboring a T-DNA insertion in G1482 displayed significantly more root growth on MS control plates as well as on different stresses in three separate experiments.
The function of G1482 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter G1482 overexpression in Arabidopsis resulted in visually high levels of the anthocyanin pigment production throughout the plant.
Utilities
Based on the phenotypes produced when this gene is knocked out, G1482 or its orthologs can be used to manipulate root growth, particularly in response to environmental stresses such as drought and low nutrients.
In addition, G1482 or its orthologs could be used to modulate anthocyanin levels. The potential utilities of genes involved in anthocyanin production include alterations in pigment production for horticultural purposes and increase stress resistance perhaps in combination with other transcription factors. Flavonoids have antimicrobial activity and could be used to engineer pathogen resistance. In addition, several flavonoid compounds have health promoting effects such as the inhibition of tumor growth and cancer, prevention of bone loss and the prevention of the oxidation of lipids. Given that the phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway (from which anthocyanins are produced) feeds into the pathways for the production of a number of other classes of secondary metabolites, such as lignins and tannins, changing the activity of G1482 or its orthologs might also influence the levels of those types of compounds.
G1510 (SEQ ID NO: 241)
Published Information
G1510 was identified in the sequence of P1 clone MPI10, GenBank accession number AB020747, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. There is no other published or public information about G1510.
Experimental Observations
The 5′ and 3′ ends of G1510 were experimentally determined byRACE. RT-PCR expression analysis showed that G1510 is expressed in all tissues except roots, suggesting that the gene could have a role within green tissues.
The function of this gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which G1510 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. 35S::G1510 plants showed a dramatic change in coloration and were much darker green compared to controls. Green pigmentation also extended into the hypocotyls and roots from these plants, suggesting that the native function of G1510 could be related to plastid differentiation, chlorophyll production, or the regulation of chloroplast number. 35S::G1510 also exhibited disproportionately long hypocotyls, indicating that the gene could influence light-regulated developmental processes.
Utilities
The increased pigmentation indicated that 35S::G1510 plants had altered levels of chlorophylls or carotenoids. As such the gene or its orthologs could have a number of valuable applications.
Enhanced chlorophyll and carotenoid levels could improve yield and nutritional value in crop plants. For instance lutein, like other xanthophylls such as zeaxanthin and violaxanthin, is an essential component in the protection of the plant against the damaging effects of excessive light. Specifically, lutein contributes to the rapid rise of non-photochemical quenching in plants exposed to high light. Crop plants engineered to contain higher levels of lutein could therefore have improved photo-protection, possibly leading to less oxidative damage and better growth under high light. Additionally, elevated chlorophyll levels might increase photosynthetic capacity, and hence yield.
G1510 or its orthologs might be also applied to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs. For example, consumption of dark green leafy vegetables has been shown in clinical studies to reduce the risk of age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), the leading cause of blindness in elderly people.
G1538 (SEQ ID NO: 245)
Published Information
G1538 encodes a HD-ZIP class I homeodomain protein and corresponds to gene MSN2.9 within P1 clone MSN2 (chromosome 5, GenBank Accession ABO18119). No published data are available pertaining to the function of this gene.
Experimental Observations
G1538 function was examined via analysis of a T-DNA insertion mutant for the gene. However, plants that were homozygous for this insertion displayed a wild-type phenotype in all assays performed. Nevertheless, RT-PCR studies on wild-type plants revealed G1538 expression to be induced in leaves by heat and salicylic acid treatments. Under normal physiological conditions, G1538 was expressed at moderately high levels in roots, flowers and siliques, but at rather low levels in leaves, shoot stems, embryos, and germinating seeds.
We have now assessed the role of G1538 by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the gene was overexpressed. The boundaries of G1538 were identified by RACE experiments, a clone was amplified from cDNA derived from mixed tissues, and 35S::G1538 lines were generated. Approximately half of the T1 lines flowered earlier than wild-type controls under continuous light conditions, but this phenotype was not apparent in three of those lines, which were grown under a less inductive 12-hour photoperiod in the T2 generation. Interestingly, though, the plants from all three T2 lines did develop slightly longer leaf petioles than wild type. Such an effect had not been noted among the primary transformants, but it is noteworthy that increased petiole length is sometimes associated with accelerated or delayed flowering.
Given the alterations in flowering time, it is possible, that elevated G1538 activity can accelerate flowering specifically under inductive photoperiodic conditions. However, such effects on flowering time should be further examined by growing larger populations of plants from a number of different lines, under a variety of growth conditions.
Importantly, 35S::G1538 transformants also displayed a pronounced phenotype in the physiological assays: each of three independent T2 lines had improved tolerance to salt stress in a plate-based root growth assay. The 35S::G1538 seedlings were larger and displayed more secondary root growth than wild-type controls subjected to the same treatments.
Utilities
Based on the phenotypes observed in morphological and physiological assays, G1538 might be have a number of utilities.
Given the salt resistance exhibited by 35S::G1538 transformants, the gene might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in saline soils, or under drought conditions.
The early flowering displayed by 35S::G1538 transformants indicates that the gene might be used to accelerate the flowering of commercial species, or to eliminate any requirements for vernalization.
Finally, as noted in our earlier reports, the RT-PCR experiments indicate that the gene and/or its promoter could be useful in designing plants that are more resilient to heat or physiological conditions that result in high levels of salicylic acid. The G1538 promoter might also be applied to create gene expression systems that are heat or salicylic acid inducible.
G1539 (SEQ ID NO: 247)
Published Information
G1539 was identified within a sequence released by the Arabidopsis genome initiative (gene MEB5.20, P1 clone MEB5, Chromosome 3, GenBank accession, AB019230,), as a gene encoding a novel WUSCHEL-like homeodomain protein. No data regarding the function of this gene are available in the public literature.
Experimental Observations
The boundaries of G1539 were determined by RACE experiments, and transgenic lines were generated in which the gene was overexpressed from a 35S promoter. These plants displayed a wild-type response in all of the physiological assays, but showed some striking alterations in morphology compared to controls. 35S::G1539 lines exhibited a spectrum of developmental changes including alterations in leaf shape, phyllotaxy, coloration, growth rate, floral organ abnormalities, and a reduction in overall size. However, the most prominent phenotype was seen in the inflorescence, where strange growths, which took on a carpelloid identity, developed from stems, pedicels and floral organs. Occasionally, on the stems of 35S::G1539 T1 plants, trichomes were positioned at the apex of gland-like structures.
Similar results were previously obtained from overexpression of a related gene, WUSCHEL (G1540), which was found to induce the formation of callus like tissue that later took on a carpelloid identity. WUSCHEL has a key role in the maintenance of stem cell identity within apical meristems, and during the reproductive phase, participates in a feedback loop with the AGAMOU.S. gene, which induces floral meristems to terminally differentiate into carpels (Mayer et al. (1998) Cell 95: 805-815; Schoof et al (2000) Cell 100: 635-644; Lohmann et al. (2001) Cell 105: 793-803). The similarity between the WUS and G1539 overexpression phenotypes indicated that the genes have similar roles in regulating apical meristem activity.
Two other WUS-like genes, G1591 and G2983, have also yielded similar overexpression phenotypes to G1539.
Utilities
Given its capacity to trigger ectopic carpel development in Arabidopsis, G1539 or its orthologs could be applied to commercial species to induce formation of increased numbers of carpels or fruits. A particular application might exist in saffron, one of the world's most expensive spices. Saffron filaments, or threads, are actually the dried stigmas of the saffron flower, Crocus Sativus Linneaus. Each flower contains only three stigmas, and more than 75,000 of these flowers are needed to produce just one pound of saffron filaments. A gene such as G1539, which increased carpel numbers, could therefore substantially increase yield.
Additionally, the overexpression phenotypes of G1539 indicate that it or its orthologs might be used to regulate meristem activity and stem cell identity. As such, the gene could have applications in the plant cell culture lines, or in transformation or micro-propagation systems, where generation of callus is currently problematic but is required as part of the procedure.
The alterations in trichome development seen in occasional lines indicated that the gene or its orthologs could be used to manipulate the formation of those structures.
G1557 (SEQ ID NO: 255)
Published Information
G1557 was identified in the sequence of chromosome 4, GenBank accession number AL161501, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. It is not annotated in the public sequence. No functional information is available about G1557.
Experimental Observations
The function of G557 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. G1557 overexpression in Arabidopsis resulted in increased seedling vigor in response to salt stress in a germination assay.
Utilities
G1557 or its orthologs may be useful for increasing salt tolerance. Salt (and drought) stress signal transduction consists of ionic and osmotic homeostasis signaling pathways. The pathway regulating ion homeostasis in response to salt stress has been reviewed recently by Xiong and Zhu ((2002) Plant Cell Environ. 25: 131-139). The osmotic component of salt stress involves complex plant reactions that are possibly overlapping with drought and/or cold stress responses. Common aspects of drought, cold and salt stress response have been reviewed recently by Xiong et al. (Xiong et al. (2002) Plant Cell 14 Suppl. S165-S183).
G1593 (SEQ ID NO: 261)
Published Information
G1593 was initially identified within a sequence released by the Arabidopsis genome initiative (gene T22O13.1 within clone T22O13, chromosome 2, GenBank accession, AC007290), as a gene encoding a novel homeodomain protein of the BEL1 class. The gene has been designated AGI number At2g27220, but no public data are available regarding its function.
Experimental Observations
The boundaries of G593 were determined by RACE experiments, and transgenic lines were generated in which the gene was overexpressed from a 35S promoter. These transformants exhibited a wild-type response to physiological assays, but displayed a number of morphological phenotypes. 35S::G1593 lines were dark in coloration, displayed alterations in leaf shape, and formed shorter, more compact inflorescences than controls.
Utilities
The changes in morphology shown by the 35S::G1593 transformants indicate that the gene or its orthologs could be used to manipulate inflorescence architecture and branching patterns in commercial species, to create varieties with more compact forms. In particular, dwarf and compact forms of ornamental plants are extremely popular among consumers. They represent a lucrative market for breeders and growers alike, but currently for many varieties, suitable dwarf breeding lines are either unavailable or difficult to integrate into existing germ-lines. Therefore, currently, many ornamental plants are sprayed with expensive chemical growth regulators to reduce height and increase compactness. Overexpression of a gene with G1593 activity could potentially alleviate this requirement.
Additionally, if the altered coloration of 35S::G1593 plants reflects a change in biochemical composition, the gene or its orthologs might be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield. For example, consumption of dark green leafy vegetables has been shown in clinical studies to reduce the risk of age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), the leading cause of blindness in elderly people.
G1660 (SEQ ID NO: 263)
Published Information
G1660 was identified by amino acid sequence similarity to other DNA-binding proteins. G1660 is found in the sequence of the chromosome 2 BAC clone F504 (GenBank accession number AC005936, nid=g4038029), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information related to the functional characterization of G1660 is currently available from the public literature.
Experimental Observations
The 5′ and 3′ ends of G1660 were experimentally determined by RACE. The function of G1660 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Plants overexpressing G1660 had more root growth and seedling vigor when grown on media containing high salt, compared to wild-type control plants. Morphological analysis of transgenic plants revealed no phenotypic alterations.
Utilities
Based on the increased salt tolerance exhibited by the 35S::G1660 lines in physiology assays, this gene might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in salinified soils, or under drought conditions.
G1730 (SEQ ID NO: 267)
Published Information
G1730 was identified in the sequence of BAC T32F12, GenBank accession number AC005314, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. There is no other published or public information about G1730.
Experimental Observations
The full-length cDNA clone corresponding to G1730 was isolated from a gene library. Based on RT-PCR experiments, G1730 was highly expressed in all tissues except roots, but was markedly repressed in rosette leaves by cold or osmotic stress.
The function of G1730 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. 35S::G1730 plants showed wild-type morphology but displayed an enhanced performance compared to controls when subjected to osmotic stress in both mannitol and glucose germination assays. Given the expression profiles of the endogenous gene, and the putative role of RING C3H2C3 proteins in regulation of ubiquitin-dependent protein turnover, G1730 may act as a modulator of factors involved in the response to abiotic stress.
Utilities
The effects of osmotic stress on G1730 expression, and the phenotype seen in 35S::G1730 lines, indicated that the gene or its orthologs can be used to engineer plants with increased tolerance to abiotic stresses such as drought, salt, or cold.
G1753 (SEQ ID NO: 271)
Published Information
G1753 (At2g36450) was identified as part of the chromosome 2 clone F1O11 (GenBank accession AC006919).
Experimental Observations
The function of G1753 was analyzed using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G1753 produced changes in Arabidopsis shoot architecture. 35S::G1753 transformants generally displayed reduced internode elongation in the inflorescence. Overall, this gave the plants a shorter, bushier appearance compared to wild type.
Two out of the three G1753 overexpressing lines showed a increase in the germination efficiency on media containing high concentrations of sucrose, indicating the gene is involved in sugar metabolism and/or signaling. In this context, it is striking that expression of the endogenous G1753 in wild-type plants was only detected in siliques, indicating that G1753 could be involved in sugar sensing processes in early seed development.
Utilities
G1753 could be used to create dwarf and compact forms of ornamental plants in horticulture markets. Dwarf and compact forms of ornamental plants are extremely popular among consumers. They represent a lucrative market for breeders and growers alike, but currently for many varieties, suitable dwarf breeding lines are either unavailable or difficult to integrate into existing germ-lines. Therefore, currently, many ornamental plants are sprayed with expensive chemical growth regulators to reduce height and increase compactness. Overexpression of a gene with G1753 activity could potentially alleviate this requirement.
The results of physiological assays indicate that G1753 could be used to alter the sugar signaling in plants.
If the physiological phenotype is related to osmotic stress, the gene could be used to engineer cold and dehydration tolerance.
G1779 (SEQ ID NO: 275)
Published Information
G1779 was identified from the Arabidopsis genomic sequence (GenBank accession number AL049483) based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other GATA related proteins in Arabidopsis. 
Experimental Observations
The function of this gene was initially studied by knockout analysis. Plants homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in G1779 were wild type for all assays performed.
Gene expression profiling using RT-PCR showed that G1779 is expressed in all tissues, albeit at higher levels in leaves.
The function of G1779 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G1779 resulted in plants that showed enhanced tolerance to chilling stress when grown under low temperatures for an extended period of time. The majority of 35S::G1779 plants were wild type in morphological analyses that were performed.
Utilities
G1779 might be used to improve chilling tolerance.
G1792 (SEQ ID NO: 277)
Published Information
G1792 was identified in the sequence of BAC clone K14B15 (AB025608, gene K14B15.14). No information is available about the function(s) of G1792.
Closely Related Genes from Other Species
G1792 shows sequence similarity, outside of the conserved AP2 domain, with a protein from tomato, represented by EST sequence AI776626 (AI776626 EST257726 tomato resistant, Cornell Lycopersicon esculentum cDNA clone cLER19A14, mRNA sequence). No functional information is available about this tomato gene.
Experimental Observations
The function of G1792 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter.
35S::G1792 overexpressing plants were larger and greener than wild-type control plants in a soil-based drought assay.
35S::G1792 plants were more tolerant to the fungal pathogens Fusarium oxysporum and Botrytis cinerea: they showed fewer symptoms after inoculation with a low dose of each pathogen. These results were confirmed using individual T2 lines. FIG. 7C shows a G1792 overexpressing line (labeled G1792-12; on left) and wild-type plants (on right) five days after inoculation with Botrytis cinerea, showing the chlorosis and hyphal growth in the latter control plants but not in the former overexpressors. Additional, experiments have confirmed that 35S::G1792 plants also showed increased tolerance to challenge with Erysiphe. Five days after inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum, the G1792 overexpressors, as seen on the left in FIG. 7D, showed little or no chlorosis, as compared with wild-type plants on the right of FIG. 7D.
The effect of G1792 overexpression in increasing tolerance to pathogens received further, incidental confirmation. T2 plants of 35S::G1792 lines 5 and 12 were being grown (for other purposes) in a room that suffered a serious powdery mildew infection. For each line, a pot of 6 plants was present in a flat containing 9 other pots of lines from unrelated genes. In either of the two different flats, the only plants that were free from infection were those from the 35S::G1792 line. This observation indicated that G1792 overexpression might increase resistance to powdery mildew. Interestingly, G1792 was ubiquitously expressed, but appeared to be induced by salicylic acid.
35S::G1792 overexpressing plants showed more tolerance to growth under nitrogen-limiting conditions. In a root growth assay under conditions of limiting N, 35S::G1792 lines were less stunted. In a germination assay that monitors the effect of C on N signaling through anthocyanin production on high sucrose plus and minus glutamine (Hsieh et al. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A) 95: 13965-13970), the 35S::G1792 lines made less anthocyanin, showed greater cotyledon expansion and had more root growth on high sucrose medium supplemented with glutamine (FIG. 7A) than control plants (FIG. 7B), indicating that the gene could be involved in the plants' ability to monitor their carbon and nitrogen status.
G1792 overexpressing plants showed several mild morphological alterations: leaves were dark green and shiny, and plants bolted, subsequently senesced, slightly later than wild-type controls. Among the T1 plants, additional morphological variation (not reproduced later in the T2 plants) was observed: many showed reductions in size as well as aberrations in leaf shape, phyllotaxy, and flower development.
Utilities
G1792 or its equivalogs could be used to engineer pathogen-resistant plants.
In addition, G1792 or its equivalogs could also be used to improve seedling germination and performance under conditions of limited nitrogen, and plants with enhanced drought tolerance.
G1796 (SEQ ID NO: 279)
Published Information
G1796 (At1g12980) is found in the sequence of BAC clone F3F19, GenBank accession number AC007357 (nid=4662618). G1796 was identified by Banno et al. ((2001) Plant Cell 13: 2609-2618) as ESR1 (Enhancer of Shoot Regeneration) in a screening for Arabidopsis cDNAs that can confer cytokinin-independent shoot formation from root cultures when overexpressed. The authors found enhanced shoot regeneration when a chemically inducible system was used for transient expression of ESR1. Transformation of Arabidopsis plants with a 35S::ESR1 construct using the flower vacuum infiltration method strongly inhibited normal leaf development. Only one transgenic 35S::ESR1 plant was obtained which produced dark green calli suggesting that ESR1 enhances shoot regeneration but interferes with the subsequent differentiation of plant cells.
G1796 was found to be included in patent application WO0200903.
Experimental Observations
The intronless G1796 gene was cloned from genomic DNA for overexpression. The function of the gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which G1796 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G1796 caused severe growth defects: seedlings were generally distinctly small and formed rather dark curled leaves. The growth arrest at very early seedling stages was also found by Banno et al. (2001) supra. The thickened club-like carpels, and the changes found in the structure of the inflorescences could be related to the function of G1796 in organogenesis, but were not specifically described by Banno et al. (2001) supra.
G1796 was expressed at low level in root, flower and rosette, but not in stems, siliques, embryos or germinating seeds.
Utilities
The use of G796 for plant regeneration after transformation has been described by Banno et al. (2001) supra.
G1796 might be used to manipulate fruit size and shape.
Additionally, if the dark coloration of 35S::G1796 lines reflects an increase in biochemical composition, the gene might be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield.
G1797 (SEQ ID NO: 281)
Published Information
G1797 was identified within P1 clone MJM18 (chromosome 5, GenBank accession AB025623) as one of a pair of novel, highly related, tandemly arranged MADS box genes (the other gene was G1798). A functional characterization of G1797 remains to be published.
Experimental Observations
To assess the function of G1797, transgenic Arabidopsis lines were analyzed in which the gene was overexpressed from a CaMV promoter. 35S::G1797 transformants were very early flowering, had curled leaves, and retained outer whorl floral organs for a prolonged period following pollination and silique outgrowth. These phenotypes indicated that G1797 might influence genetic pathways that regulate flowering time or floral organ senescence and abscission. However, despite these changes in growth and development, 35S::G1797 lines displayed a wild type response in all of the physiological assays.
It should be noted that accelerated flowering and changes in flower morphology were also observed as a result of overexpression of the putative paralog, G1798, indicating that the two genes have related functions. Two other related genes, G627 and G1011, also produced very similar effects to G1797 and G1798 when overexpressed.
Interestingly, equivalent effects on perianth organs to those described above were obtained by Fernandez et al. ((2000) Plant Cell 12: 183-198) through overexpression of AGAMOUS-LIKE 15 (AGL15). G1797 and AGL15 occupy different clades within the MADS family, but the similarity in phenotype may indicate that they act in common pathways.
Utilities
The accelerated switch to reproductive growth seen in 35S::G1797 plants, indicated that the gene or its equivalogs could be used to manipulate flowering time in commercial species. Specifically, G1797 could be used to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization. Conversely, it is possible that the activity of G1797 or its equivalogs could be modified to delay flowering. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
The effects on flower development are also of commercial interest; the persistence of outer whorl organs following pollination in 35S::G1797 lines indicated that the gene or its equivalogs could be applied to ornamental plants to prolong the life of blooms.
G1798 (SEQ ID NO: 283)
Published Information
G1798 was identified within P1 clone MJM18 (chromosome 5, GenBank accession AB025623) as one of a pair of novel, highly related, tandemly arranged MADS box genes (the other gene was G1797). A functional characterization of G1798 remains to be published.
Experimental Observations
To assess the function of G1798, we analyzed transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the gene was overexpressed from a CaMV promoter. 35S::G1798 transformants were very early flowering, had curled leaves, were very small and displayed severe abnormalities in flower development. As a result of such defects, the plants showed very poor fertility and insufficient seed was obtained to perform physiological assays. Additionally, a number of 35S::G1798 lines displayed terminal flowers, indicating that the gene could influence meristem determinacy.
It should be noted that accelerated flowering and changes in flower development were also observed as a result of overexpression of the putative paralog, G1797, indicating that the two genes have related functions. Interestingly, 35S::G1797 lines exhibited delayed floral organ abscission; such a phenotype might also have been prevalent in 35S::G1798 plants, but could have been masked by the severe sterility of these lines. Two other related genes, G627 and G1011 also produced very similar effects to G1797 and G1798 when overexpressed.
Utilities
The accelerated switch to reproductive growth seen in 35S::G1798 plants, indicated that the gene or its equivalogs could be used to manipulate flowering time in commercial species. Specifically, G1798 could be used to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization. Conversely, it is possible that the activity of G1798 or its equivalogs could be modified to delay flowering. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
The effects on flower and inflorescence development are also of commercial interest and indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to manipulate floral traits such as sterility or fruit development, or to produce novel plant architectures.
G1816 (SEQ ID NO: 287)
Published Information
G1816 is a member of the MYB-related class of transcription factors. The gene corresponds to TRIPTYCHON (TRY), and has recently been shown to be involved in the lateral inhibition during epidermal cell specification in the leaf and root (Schellmann et al. (2002) EMBO J. 21: 5036-5046). The model proposes that TRY (G1816) and CPC (G225) function as repressors of trichome and atrichoblast cell fate. TRY loss-of-function mutants form ectopic trichomes on the leaf surface. TRY gain-of-function mutants are glabrous and form ectopic root hairs.
Experimental Observations
The complete sequence of G1816 was determined. The function of the gene was studied using transgenic plants in which G1816 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Consistent with the morphological phenotypes published for the 35S::TRY overexpressors, the transgenic plants were glabrous and form ectopic root hairs. These transgenic lines were also more tolerant to growth under nitrogen-limiting conditions, both in a germination assay as well as a root growth assay on older seedlings. In addition to the nitrogen-limiting tolerance phenotypes observed in these transgenic lines, the 35S::G1816 plants were also insensitive to growth retardation effects of germination on conditions of high glucose, indicating that this gene could play a role in sugar sensing responses in the plant or osmotic stress tolerance. Genes for many sugar-sensing mutants are allelic to genes involved in abscisic acid and ethylene signaling (Rolland et al. (2002) Plant Cell 14: Suppl. S185-S205). Therefore, G1816 could also be involved in hormone signaling pathways.
Utilities
The phenotypic effects of G1816 overexpression, such as the increase in root hair formation and the increase in seedling vigor observed in a germination assay on high glucose media, indicated that the gene or its orthologs can be used to engineer plants with increased tolerance to abiotic stresses such as drought, salt, heat or cold.
In addition, the enhanced performance of G1816 overexpression lines under low nitrogen conditions indicated that the gene or its orthologs could be used to engineer crops that could thrive under conditions of reduced nitrogen availability.
The effect of G1816 overexpression on insensitivity to glucose in a germination assay, indicated that the gene or its orthologs could be involved in sugar sensing responses in the plant.
G1816 or its orthologs could also be used to alter anthocyanin production and trichome formation in leaves.
The potential utilities of genes involved in anthocyanin production include alterations in pigment production for horticultural purposes and increase stress resistance perhaps in combination with other transcription factors. Flavonoids have antimicrobial activity and could be used to engineer pathogen resistance. In addition, several flavonoid compounds have health promoting effects such as the inhibition of tumor growth and cancer, prevention of bone loss and the prevention of the oxidation of lipids.
Given that the phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway (from which anthocyanins are produced) feeds into the pathways for the production of a number of other classes of secondary metabolites, such as lignins and tannins, changing the activity of G1816 or its orthologs might also influence the levels of those types of compounds.
G1837 (SEQ ID NO: 295)
Published Information
G1837 (At5g54480) was identified as part of the BAC clone F24B18, GenBank accession number AB026634 (nid=4757390).
Experimental Observations
The function of the gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which a G1837 genomic clone was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Transgenic plants overexpressing G1837 showed increased tolerance to NaCl in the root inhibition assay, and also a potential enhancement of chilling tolerance. Under normal growth conditions, 35S::G1837 lines showed wild-type morphology.
Utilities
G1837 could be used to engineer increased salt stress tolerance.
G1840 (SEQ ID NO: 297)
Published Information
G1840 (At5g67010) was identified as part of TAC clone K8A10 (GenBank accession AB026640).
Experimental Observations
Overexpression of G1840 induced necrosis and death of patches of tissue in aerial part of the plant, indicating that it might be influence pathways of disease response, programmed cell death, or senescence. At early stages of development, 35S::G1840 seedlings appeared normal. However, towards the end of the rosette phase, these plants displayed rather broad flat dark leaves with short petioles. Randomly distributed, brown specks of necrotic tissue became visible on the leaves at around this time. Similar effects were noted in the inflorescence; in severely affected plants, the entire inflorescence tips became brown and withered away without producing seeds. This phenomenon was seen in both primary and secondary inflorescences, and plants with a strong phenotype developed a very short, bushy architecture.
A related AP2 family gene, G1749, was analyzed, and found to produce similar effects to G1840 when overexpressed.
Utilities
The overexpression phenotype indicates G1840 could have a role in regulating programmed cell death. Such a function could have various applications. The gene, its targets, or its equivalogs could be used to induce cell death in a controlled manner in specific tissues or in response to pathogen attack. For example, if the gene was specifically active in gametes or reproductive organs, the gene or its equivalogs might be used to achieve male or female sterility. Alternatively, in the latter scenario, the gene or its equivalogs might restrict the spread of a pathogen infection through a plant.
G1863 (SEQ ID NO: 303)
Published Information
G1863 was identified by amino acid sequence similarity to rice Growth-regulating-factor1 (GRF1), which has a potential role in the regulation of stem growth (Knaap et al. (2000) Plant Physiol. 122: 695-704). G1863, which has also been referred to as Arabidopsis GRL3, is found in the sequence of chromosome II section 199 of 255 (GenBank accession AC006919.5 GI:6598632), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information related to the functional characterization of G1863 is currently available from the public literature.
Experimental Observations
G1863 was found to be ubiquitously expressed, but had lower levels of expression in the stems of shoots than in other tissues. It was also determined that homozygotes for a T-DNA insertion within G1863 showed increased sensitivity to NaCl in germination assays.
35S::G1863 overexpressing transformants displayed a wild-type response in the physiology assays, but did display a number of morphological phenotypes. Plants that overexpress G1863 had larger leaves that had higher levels of chlorophyll per unit area. These plants were dark in coloration, showed changes in leaf shape, and delayed flowering.
Utilities
G1863 or its orthologs could be used to generate salt or drought tolerant crops.
The overexpression data indicate that the gene could have a number of additional applications.
The delayed flowering displayed by 35S::G1863 transformants indicated that the gene or its orthologs might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
Conversely, the activity of G1863 or its orthologs might be modified to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
This transcription factor or its orthologs could be used to improve plant productivity through increased biomass or yield and/or improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield. With regard to the former, consumption of dark green leafy vegetables has been shown in clinical studies to reduce the risk of age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), the leading cause of blindness in elderly people.
The changes in leaf shape shown by 35S::G1863 plants also indicated that the gene or its orthologs could be used to engineer changes in plant form.
G1893 (SEQ ID NO: 305)
Published Information
G1893 (At1g(3790) was identified in the sequence of P1 clone MOE17 (GenBank accession number AB025629) based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other C2H2 related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about the function(s) of G1893.
Experimental Observations
G1893 is expressed ubiquitously at moderately low levels and was weakly induced by cold. The function of G1893 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G1893 resulted in seedlings with square cotyledons. True leaves were small with serrated margins. Many initial transformants did not survive past early stages of growth. Those that did survive were small and produced few seeds. These seedlings also contained more anthocyanin.
G1893 is a paralog of G3062 and G1976. Similar to what was seen with overexpression of G1893, overexpression of G3062 produced highly deleterious effects on Arabidopsis growth and development. It was nearly impossible to obtain 35S::G3062 transformants. Only one line survived to maturity, but was markedly smaller than wild-type controls at all stages of development, and yielded few seeds. Overexpression of G1976 also produced alterations in leaf morphology and flower development, as well as causing an extreme decrease in overall plant size and fertility. Severely affected 35S::G1976 lines were tiny, and died at early stages. More moderate phenotypes that were observed were very small plants with dark green leaves with serrated leaf margins. Inflorescences were short and lacked internode elongation. Floral organs were mostly very poorly developed with short pedicels. Fertility of 35S::G1976 transformants was very poor and many plants completely failed to set seed.
Utilities
G1893 or its equivalogs may have a utility in modifying fertility, cotyledon shape or plant architecture.
G1928 (SEQ ID NO: 311)
Published Information
G1928 was identified in the sequence of P1 clone MCP4, GenBank accession number AB028610, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. There is no other published or public information about the function(s) of G1928.
Experimental Observations
The function of G1928 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing G1928 grew much more vigorously than wild-type plants at 4° C.; the plants were larger, less chlorotic and showed fewer symptoms of stress.
Utilities
Based on the effects of G1928 overexpression, the gene or its orthologs might be used to protect crops against low temperature conditions.
G1968 (SEQ ID NO: 321)
Published Information
G1968 (At1g26610) was identified in the sequence of BAC T1K7 (GenBank accession number AC013427), based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other C2H2 related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about the function of G1968.
Experimental Observations
The function of G1968 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G1968 resulted in plants that were small and slow developing. Flowers were also small and had defects in organ formation. G1968 overexpressing lines contained more anthocyanins when grown under low nitrogen, or low nitrogen plus glutamine, in a germination assay. When grown on control plates, two lines exhibited size segregation. One line was wild type.
Utilities
On the basis of the response of G1968 to low nitrogen media, the gene might be useful in developing plants that are more tolerant to poor nutrient growth conditions.
G1983 (SEQ ID NO: 323)
Published Information
G1983 (At1g03790) was identified in the sequence of BAC F21M11 (GenBank accession number AC003027) based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other C3H related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about the function of G983.
Experimental Observations
The function of G1983 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G1983 resulted in plants that were small, darker green and flowered late. 35S::G1983 plants were wild type in all physiological analyses that were performed.
Utilities
Based on the delayed flowering of G1983 overexpression lines, the gene might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
If the dark coloration of 35S::G1983 lines reflects an increase in biochemical composition, the gene might be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield.
G1985 (SEQ ID NO: 325)
Published Information
G1985 was identified in the sequence of BAC F3L24, GenBank accession number AC011436, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. There is no other published or public information about G1985.
Experimental Observations
The 5′ and 3′ ends of G1985 were determined by RACE PCR, and the gene function was analyzed via overexpression lines.
Overexpression of G985 produced a spectrum of alterations in Arabidopsis development. However, the most dramatic effect was observed in the inflorescence, where G1985 appeared to inhibit reproductive development and caused a reversion towards vegetative growth. 35S::G1985 plants were very small, slow developing, formed rather dark curled leaves. The inflorescences from these plants were generally stunted, and carried flowers that often had underdeveloped organs and poor pollen production. Strikingly, however, inflorescences typically showed an increase in vegetative characteristics and often formed small aerial rosettes. Additionally, in some cases, the inflorescence meristem apparently reverted back to initiating leaf primordia once it had entered the phase of flower initiation.
Floral reversion is extremely rare in Arabidopsis, especially under inductive light conditions such as those in which these experiments were performed. In wild-type plants, the shoot meristem, on becoming an inflorescence meristem, usually forms 2-3 single cauline leaf primordia (which develop secondary shoots in their axils) and then initiates floral meristems until senescence occurs. The inflorescence meristem displays a strong commitment to flower formation, and usually never switches back into a phase of leaf production once flower initiation has commenced. However, in some species (e.g. Impatiens) floral reversion does occur, and is an important means by which the plant achieves developmental plasticity in response to changing environmental conditions (Battey et al. (2002). Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5: 62-68; Battey (2000) J. Exp. Bot. 51: 1769-1780).
Utilities
The experimental results obtained with G1985 overexpressors indicate that the gene or its orthologs can modulate the developmental programs, which regulate phase change and developmental plasticity of the shoot meristem. In particular, the gene might be used to manipulate seasonality and influence whether plants display an annual or perennial habit.
G1988 (SEQ ID NO: 327)
Published Information
G1988 (At3g21150) is in P1 clone MSA6 (GenBank accession number AP000604) and was identified based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other CONSTANS-like related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about the function of G1988.
Experimental Observations.
The function of G1988 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Evidence from physiological and morphological assays indicates that G1988 may play a role in developmental processes regulated by light; 35S::G1988 seedlings displayed longer hypocotyls, elongated petioles, and a number of lines flowered early.
When grown on limited phosphate, all lines appeared larger and had more root growth than controls. Seedlings germinated on plates that contained limited nitrogen (supplemented with glutamine) appeared less stressed than controls.
Utilities
Based on the results from physiological assays, G1988 might be used to engineer plants that show enhanced growth and survivability in low nutrient environments.
G1988 could also have a role in modulating developmental processes regulated by light, such as shade avoidance. Eliminating shading responses could lead to increased planting densities with subsequent yield enhancement. The gene might also be useful in manipulating flowering time.
G1995 (SEQ ID NO: 333)
Published Information
G1995 (At3g58070) is in BAC T10K17 (GenBank accession number AL132977) and was identified based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other zinc finger DOF-related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about the function of G1995.
Experimental Observations
The function of G1995 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G1995 resulted in plants that had flowers with increased trichome density on sepals and ectopic trichomes on carpels. The flowers also had rather poor pollen production and many of the lines yielded only relatively small quantities of seed. One line displayed aerial rosette like structures and had floral organs that were converted towards a bract-like identity. In physiological analyses, G1995 overexpressors showed size segregation and a slight increase in sensitivity to nutrient limitation.
Utilities
Based on the results from physiological assays, G1995 might be used to engineer plants that show enhanced growth and survivability in low nutrient environments.
The morphological effects of G1995 overexpression indicate a number of potential applications relating to increasing or changing trichome density:
Trichome glands on the surface of many higher plants produce and secrete exudates that give protection from the elements and pests such as insects, microbes and herbivores. These exudates may physically immobilize insects and spores, may be insecticidal or anti-microbial or they may produce allergens or irritants to protect against herbivores. Trichomes have also been suggested to decrease transpiration by decreasing leaf surface airflow, and by exuding chemicals that protect the leaf from the sun.
Depending on the plant species, varying amounts of diverse secondary biochemicals (often lipophilic terpenes) are produced and exuded or volatilized by trichomes. These exotic secondary biochemicals, which are relatively easy to extract because they are on the surface of the leaf, have been widely used in such products as flavors and aromas, drugs, pesticides and cosmetics. One class of secondary metabolites, the diterpenes, can effect several biological systems such as tumor progression, prostaglandin synthesis and tissue inflammation. In addition, diterpenes can act as insect pheromones, termite allomones, and can exhibit neurotoxic, cytotoxic and antimitotic activities. As a result of this functional diversity, diterpenes have been the target of research several pharmaceutical ventures. In most cases where the metabolic pathways are impossible to engineer, increasing trichome density or size on leaves may be the only way to increase plant productivity.
Thus, the use of G1995 and its homologs to increase trichome density, size or type may therefore have profound utilities in so called molecular farming practices and increasing the yield of cotton fibers.
If the effects on trichome patterning and/or aerial rosette formation reflect a general change in heterochronic processes, G995 or other clade members, might be used to modify the way meristems and/or cells develop during different phases of the plant life cycle. In particular, altering the timing of phase changes could afford positive effects on yield and biomass production.
G2041 (SEQ ID NO: 341 and SEQ ID NO: 2110)
Published Information
The transcriptional regulator G2041 was identified by amino acid sequence similarity to proteins of the SWI/SNF family of chromatin remodeling factors. G2041 is found in the sequence of the chromosome 3, BAC clone T12K4 (AL138640.1 GI:6899910), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No additional public information related to the functional characterization of G2041 is available.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2041 was analyzed through its overexpression in Arabidopsis; 35S::G2041 lines displayed no consistent morphological changes when compared to control plants. However, the overexpression lines were more tolerant to salt stress in a germination assay. It should be noted that since a truncated version of the gene (SEQ ID NO: 2110) was overexpressed, the phenotype obtained could be a dominant negative type effect.
Utilities
The results of physiological assays indicate that G2041 or its equivalogs could be modify abiotic stress responses. Given the salt resistance exhibited by 35S::G2041 transformants, the gene or its equivalogs might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in saline soils, or under drought conditions.
G2051 (SEQ ID NO: 343)
Published Information
G2051 corresponds to AT11G32510, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome initiative. No information is available about the function(s) of G2051.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2051 was analyzed using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. The phenotypes of the 35S::G2051 transgenic Arabidopsis plants were wild-type in morphology.
G2051 overexpressing lines were more tolerant of chilling stress in a germination assay. Two of the three lines analyzed showed the response.
Utilities
Based on the phenotype observed in 35S::G2051 transgenic plants, the gene or its equivalogs could be engineered to manipulate the response to abiotic stresses, such as cold during germination. For example, a gene that enhanced germination and seedling vigor in the cold would have tremendous utility in allowing seeds to be planted earlier in the season with a higher survival rate.
G2060 (SEQ ID NO: 345)
Published Information
G2060 corresponds to gene AT1g69810, and it has also been described as WRKY36. No information is available about the function(s) of G2060.
Experimental Observations
G2060 is ubiquitously expressed in Arabidopsis, with slightly higher levels of transcript being found in roots than in other samples.
A T-DNA insertion mutant for G2060 was analyzed and shown to display a wild-type morphology, and was also wild-type in its response to the physiological analyses that were performed.
Transgenic plants in which G2060 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter were then generated. No consistent morphological or developmental alterations were observed as a consequence of G2060 overexpression. However, 35S::G2060 seedlings were more tolerant to salt stress in a root inhibition assay when compared to the wild-type controls.
Utilities
Based on the increased salt tolerance exhibited by the 35S::G2060 lines in physiology assays, this gene might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in salinified soils, or under drought conditions.
G2085 (SEQ ID NO: 355)
Published Information
G2085 was identified in the sequence of BAC T22A6, GenBank accession number AL078637, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative.
G2085 appears to correspond to ZIM (at residue 306 near the carboxyl terminus, leucine is replaced by methionine in ZIM, compared to isolated cDNA, and the genomic sequence released by AGI). Nishii et al. ((2000) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 64: 1402-1409) isolated ZIM by differential screening of an arrayed normalized cDNA library from inflorescence tissue of Arabidopsis (Takemura et al. (1999) DNA Res. 6: 275-282). In addition to the GATA domain, ZIM contains a basic region with a sequence resembling a nuclear localization signal, and an acidic region. The nuclear localization of ZIM was detected using GFP as a reporter. Based on its expression pattern, zinc finger domain, and nuclear localization, the authors suggest that ZIM is involved in inflorescence and flower development.
Experimental Observations
G2085 was determined to be constitutively expressed throughout the plant, and that its expression is markedly repressed by a variety of stress conditions such as abscisic acid, cold, osmotic stress, and Erysiphe. G2085 was analyzed via a homozygous T-DNA insertion mutant and that line appeared wild-type in all assays.
The complete sequence of G2085 was determined, and G2085 overexpression lines were generated. Many of the plants overexpressing G2085 had small, dark colored, hirsute, inner rosette leaves. Altered seed morphology and increased seed size was also noted. Trichome density was increased.
In each set of primary transformants, many of the lines were smaller than wild type controls. In particular, the adult rosette leaves of around half of the plants from the second set were noted to be small, dark in coloration, and have a rather high trichome density. Additionally, alterations in morphology were observed in the seeds from a small number of T1 lines from each set. From the first set, seeds from 2/18 lines were larger than controls, and in the second set, 4/16 lines had rather pale seeds, and two of these showed seeds that were also large.
Utilities
The promoter of G2085 may also have utility as a promoter that can be down-regulated in response to a variety of stresses.
Based on the overexpression phenotypes, G2085 or its orthologs might be used to manipulate plant growth and development. Based on the increase in seed size of the 35S::G2085 transgenic lines, G2085 could be increasing the size of the embryo and that could enhance seed traits such as seed oil or seed protein content or yield. Additionally, G2085 might be used to modify trichome density. Additionally, if the dark coloration of 35S::G2085 lines reflects an increase in biochemical composition, the gene might be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield.
The morphological effects of G2085 overexpression indicate a number of potential applications relating to increasing or changing trichome density: Thus, the use of G2085 and its equivalogs to increase trichome density, size or type may therefore have profound utilities in so called molecular farming practices and increase the yield of cotton fibers.
G2133 (SEQ ID NO: 1495)
Published Information
G2133 corresponds to gene F26A9.11 (AAF23336). No information is available about the function(s) of G2133.
Closely Related Genes from Other Species
G2133 does not show extensive sequence similarity with known genes from other plant species outside of the conserved AP2/EREBP domain.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2133 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter.
G2133 expression was detected in a variety of tissues: flower, leaf, embryo, and silique samples. Its expression might be altered by several conditions, including auxin treatment, osmotic stress, and Fusarium infection. Overexpression of G2133 caused a variety of alterations in plant growth and development: delayed flowering, altered inflorescence architecture, and a decrease in overall size and fertility.
At early stages, 35S::G2133 transformants were markedly smaller than controls and displayed curled, dark-green leaves. Most of these plants remained in a vegetative phase of development substantially longer than controls, and produced an increased number of leaves before bolting. In the most severely affected plants, bolting occurred more than a month later than in wild type (24-hour light). In addition, the plants displayed a reduction in apical dominance and formed large numbers of shoots simultaneously, from the axils of rosette leaves. These inflorescence stems had short internodes, and carried increased numbers of cauline leaf nodes, giving them a very leafy appearance. The fertility of 35S::G2133 plants was generally very low. In addition, G2133 overexpressing lines were found to be more resistant to the herbicide glyphosate in initial and repeat experiments.
No alterations were detected in 35S::G2133 plants in the biochemical analyses that were performed.
G2133 is a paralog of G47, the latter having been known from earlier studies to confer a drought tolerance phenotype when overexpressed. It was thus not surprising when G2133 was also shown to induce drought tolerance in a number of 35S::G2133 lines challenged in soil-based drought assays. Results with two of these lines are shown in FIGS. 10A and 10B, which compare the recovery of these lines from eight days of drought treatment with that of wild-type controls. After re-watering, all of the plants of both G2133 overexpressor lines became reinvigorated, and all of the control plants died or were severely affected by the drought treatment.
Utilities
G2133 could be used for the generation of glyphosate resistant plants, and to increase plant resistance to oxidative stress.
G2133 can be used to increase the tolerance of plants to drought and likely to other osmotic stresses as well.
G2142 (SEQ ID NO: 365)
Published Information
G2142 was identified by amino acid sequence similarity to other HLH/MYC proteins. G2142 is found in the sequence of the chromosome 1 BAC clone T6L1 (GenBank accession number AC011665, nid=g6358759), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information related to the functional characterization of G2142 is currently available from the public literature.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2142 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. A small number of the 35S::G2142 plants displayed a slight acceleration of flowering compared to controls. Additionally, G2142 overexpressors were more tolerant to phosphate deprivation in a root growth assay, but this effect was rather subtle.
Utilities
The results of physiological assays indicate that G2142 could be used to improve plant performance in conditions of limited phosphate.
G2146 (SEQ ID NO: 367)
Published Information
The sequence of G2146 was obtained from Arabidopsis genomic sequencing project, GenBank accession number AC012393, nid=6143859, based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other bHLH related proteins in Arabidopsis. 
Experimental Observations
The function of G2146 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G2146 resulted in plants that displayed a mild increase in the time to flowering, darker coloration, and inflorescences that were shorter and bushier than those of wild-type plants.
Utilities
G2146 could be used to generate plants that flower late or have altered leaf coloration and plant architecture. The delayed flowering displayed by 35S::G2146 transformants indicates that the gene might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
Additionally, the dark coloration of 35S::G2146 lines may reflect an increase in biochemical composition; the gene may thus be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield.
G2207 (SEQ ID NO: 371)
Published Information
G2207 (At1g20640) was identified as part of the BAC clone F5M15, GenBank accession number AC027665 (nid=8096769).
Experimental Observations
The complete sequence of G2207 was determined. The function of the gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which a genomic clone for G2207 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. In germination assays, 35S::G2207 lines showed increased tolerance to osmotic stress under conditions of high salt or high sucrose and were less sensitive to abscisic acid. All these phenotypes indicate that G2207 is involved in the plant response to dehydration stress. A small number of the lines also showed delayed flowering, indicating that the gene regulates the timing of the floral transition.
The bZIP-NIN gene G2207 does not share significant homology to any of the bZIP genes, for some of which a role in abscisic acid signaling has been reported (ABF1=G2071, ABF2=G3028, ABF3=G570, ABF4=G1058; Choi et al. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275: 1723-1730).
Utilities
G2207 appears to affect ABA sensitivity. ABA is one of the key signal molecules in the stress response pathways. G2207 may have a utility in modifying ABA responses such as seed dormancy, seed development, and cold and/or drought tolerances.
In particular, based on the increased tolerance to high levels of salt or sucrose, exhibited by the 35S::G2207 lines in physiology assays, this gene might be used to engineer crops and trees that can flourish in salinified soils, or under drought conditions.
Although the increased sucrose tolerance observed for 35S::G2207 lines is most likely related to a general dehydration stress tolerance, the gene might be involved in sugar sensing. Thus G2207 might also be used to generate crop plants with altered sink source relations.
The late flowering shown by 35S::G2207 lines indicates that the gene might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
Additionally, if the dark coloration of 35S::G2207 lines reflects an increase in biochemical composition, the gene might be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield.
G2239 (SEQ ID NO: 379)
Published Information
G2239 was identified in the sequence of BAC T12H1, GenBank accession number AC009177, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative.
G2239 corresponds to ATL6, a member of the ATL (RHE) gene family (Jensen et al. (1998) FEBS Lett. 436: 283-287; Martinez-Garcia et al. (1996) Mol. Gen. Genet. 252: 587-596; Salinas-Mondragon et al. (1999) Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 579-590). Members of the ATL gene family contain, in addition to the RING C3H2C3 domain, an n-terminal transmembrane domain. Fungal elicitors and cycloheximide applications caused rapid induction of ATL6 and ATL2 (G649) expression. However, induced ATL6 expression was found to be more stable than that of ATL2. This difference might be accounted for by the fact that the ATL63′ UTR lacks a DST element (an mRNA stability determinant found in SAUR transcripts), whereas this element is found in the 3′ UTR of ATL2. The authors suggest that ATL6 and ATL2 may function in plant-pathogen interactions.
Experimental Observations
The complete sequence of G2239 was determined and its function was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter.
G2239 overexpression lines were greener and contained less anthocyanin when grown on low nitrogen media supplemented with sucrose or sucrose plus glutamine. However, the phenotype of 35S::G2239 plants was wild-type in all morphological assays performed.
Utilities
The enhanced performance of G2239 overexpression lines under low nitrogen conditions indicated that the gene or its orthologs could be used to engineer crops that could thrive under conditions of reduced nitrogen availability.
The observation that 35S::G2239 lines made less anthocyanin on high sucrose plus glutamine, indicated that G2239 might be used to modify carbon and nitrogen status, and hence assimilate partitioning.
G2317 (SEQ ID NO: 389)
Published Information
G2317 is a novel member of the Myb-related family of transcription factors. G2317 corresponds to gene At1g18330, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information is available about the function(s) of G2317.
Experimental Observations
The complete sequence of G2317 was determined. The function of G2317 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. 35S::G2317 plants did not show consistent alterations in morphology or development.
When analyzed in physiological assays, each of three 35S::G2317 lines showed more tolerance to salt stress by displaying more root growth in a root growth assay. G2317 overexpressing lines also displayed larger size and less chlorosis in high salt (150 mM) at the seedling stage when compared to wild-type plants.
One transgenic line showed enhanced performance when germinated under cold conditions.
Utilities
The results of physiological assays indicate that G2317 could be modify abiotic stress responses.
Given the salt resistance exhibited by 35S::G2317 transformants, the gene or its orthologs might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in saline soils, or under drought conditions.
The enhanced performance of a line of 35S::G2317 seedlings under chilling conditions indicated that the gene or its orthologs might be applied to engineer crops that show better growth under cold conditions.
G2319 (SEQ ID NO: 391 and SEQ ID NO: 2112)
Published Information
G2319 corresponds to AT3G09600, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome initiative. No information is available about the function(s) of G2319.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2319 was analyzed using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Two different G2319 constructs were transformed into Arabidopsis. 
P13388 contained a truncated version of the gene (SEQ ID NO: 2112) whereas P13446 contained a full-length clone. Transformants harboring P13446 exhibited wild-type morphology and exhibited wild-type phenotypes in response to the physiology assays. A marked delay in the onset of flowering was observed in ten of the eighteen lines transformed with the P13388 construct. Three lines co-transformed with P13388 showed more tolerance to salt stress in a root growth inhibition assay. When the assay was repeated, all thereof these lines repeated the phenotype.
Given that all of the phenotypic effects resulted from overexpression of a truncated version (SEQ ID NO: 2112) of the G2319 product, it might represent a dominant negative phenotype.
Utilities
Based on the phenotypes observed in morphological and physiological assays, G2319 or its equivalogs might be have a number of utilities.
Given the salt resistance exhibited by 35S::G2319 transformants, the gene or its equivalogs might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in saline soils, or under drought conditions.
The late flowering displayed by 35S::G2319 transformants indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to delay the flowering of commercial species.
G2334 (SEQ ID NO: 393)
Published Information
G2334 was identified by amino acid sequence similarity to the rice Growth-regulating-factor1 (GRF1), which has a potential role in the regulation of stem growth in rice (Knapp et al (2000) Plant Physiol. 122: 695-704). It is found in the sequence of chromosome 3, BAC clone F8J2 (AL132969.2 GI:7629988), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information related to the functional characterization of G2334 is currently available from the public literature.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2334 was analyzed through its overexpression in Arabidopsis; 35S::G2334 lines displayed marked delay in the onset of flowering, developed large wrinkled dark green leaves, and had substantially greater vegetative biomass than wild-type controls.
It should be noted that the effects of G2334 overexpression are very similar to those produced by overexpression of a related gene G1863, indicating that the two genes might have overlapping functions.
Utilities
The overexpression data indicate that G2334 could have a number of applications.
The phenotypes displayed by 35S::G2334 transformants indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to increase size or manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. Conversely, the activity of G2334 or its equivalogs might be modified to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
Additionally, if the altered coloration of 35S::G2334 plants reflects a change in biochemical composition, the gene or its equivalogs might be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, for example, by reducing the risk of ARMD, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield.
The changes in leaf shape shown by 35S::G2334 plants indicated that the gene or its equivalogs could be used to engineer changes in plant form.
G2382 (SEQ ID NO: 401)
Published Information
The sequence of G2382 was obtained from Arabidopsis genomic sequencing project, GenBank accession number AB020746, nid=3985949, based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other triple-helix related proteins in Arabidopsis. 
Experimental Observations
The function of G2382 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G2382 resulted in plants that were insensitive to ABA treatment in a germination assay.
Utilities
G2382 appears to affect ABA sensitivity. ABA is one of key signal molecules in the stress response pathways. Therefore, G2382 may have a utility in modifying ABA responses such as seed development, seed dormancy, and cold and dehydration tolerance.
G2432 (SEQ ID NO: 407)
Published Information
G2432 (At1g29160) is in the sequence of BAC F28N24 (GenBank accession number AC021043) based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other DOF related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about the function of G2432.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2432 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G2432 resulted in very small plants with narrow cotyledons and poorly developed roots. As 35S::G2432 plants matured, tiny, round, vertically oriented leaves with extremely long petioles were observed, and flowering was delayed. Such features often indicate alterations in light regulated development. Many lines senesced without setting seed. The lines that did flower produced inflorescences with infertile flowers. Consequently, no seed was obtained for physiological analysis.
Utilities
The phenotype of plants overexpressing G2432 or its paralog G736 indicate that the former gene or its equivalogs might be used to manipulate developmental processes regulated by light, such as shade avoidance. Eliminating shading responses could lead to increased planting densities with subsequent yield enhancement. The gene might also be useful in modifying flowering time.
G2453 (SEQ ID NO: 411, SEQ ID NO: 2113 and SEQ ID NO: 2114)
Published Information
The Y ABBY transcription factor G2453 is referenced in the public literature as INNER NO OUTER (INO), and has an established role in the abaxial-adaxial patterning of Arabidopsis ovules (Baker et al. (1997) Genetics 145: 1109-1124; Villanueva et al. (1999) Genes Dev. 13: 3160-3169). In common with other transcription factors from the Y ABBY gene family, INO has an important function in specifying abaxial cell fate in organs (Baker et al. (1997) supra; Villanueva et al. (1999) supra; Siegfried et al. (1999) Development 126: 4117-4128). G2453 is found in the sequence of the chromosome 1 BAC F28C11 (AC007945.3 GI:8096767), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2453 was analyzed through its ectopic overexpression in Arabidopsis. The sequences that were used to confer the phenotypes disclosed here were SEQ ID NOs: 2113 and SEQ ID NO: 2114, which are both variants of the G2453 sequence. These experiments revealed a number of morphological changes that are consistent with the previously defined role of Y ABBYs in abaxial cell fate determination in leaves, floral organs and ovules. The plants were generally small, slow developing, and produced rather dark, curled leaves that had a wrinkled surface texture compared to those of wild type. Additionally, an effect was observed which has not been discussed in the public literature: G2453 overexpression resulted in accumulation of high levels of anthocyanins, particularly at early stages of seedling development.
A number of lines in which an antisense version of G2453 was overexpressed were also examined. These lines exhibited wild-type morphology but displayed enhanced tolerance to salt stress in a germination assay.
Utilities
Based on the published data, the gene or its equivalogs could potentially be used to modify leaf and flower development. In particular, the gene might be used to manipulate fruit traits.
The increased pigment levels and dark coloration observed in 35S::G2453 transformants point towards a number of utilities reducing the risk of ARMD by consumption of plants so altered.
Given that the 35S::G2453 plants likely had increased chlorophyll levels, the gene or its equivalogs might also be used to enhance photosynthetic capacity and yield.
G2453 or its equivalogs could also be applied to alter pigment production for horticultural purposes and to increase stress resistance. Flavonoids have antimicrobial activity and could be used to engineer pathogen resistance. Since the phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway (from which anthocyanins are produced) feeds into the pathways for the production of a number of other classes of secondary metabolites, such as lignins and tannins, changing the activity of G2453 or its equivalogs might also influence the levels of those types of compounds.
Given the increased salt tolerance exhibited by the 35S::G2453 antisense lines, the gene or its equivalogs might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in salinified soils, or under drought conditions.
G2457 (SEQ ID NO: 417)
Published Information
G2457 is known in the public literature as CRABS CLAW (CRC), which in common with other members of the Y ABBY family, plays an important role in specifying abaxial cell fate in leaves and floral organs (Alvarez et al (1999) Development: 126: 2377-2386; Bowman et al. (1999) Development:126: 2387-2396; Eshed et al. (1999) Cell 99: 199-209; Siegfried (1999) Development 126: 4117-4128). G2457 is found in the sequence of the chromosome 1, BAC F23010 (GenBank accession number AC018364.5; GI:12325073), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2457 was analyzed through its ectopic overexpression in Arabidopsis; 35S::G2457 lines exhibited a number of morphological changes, which are consistent with the previously defined role of CRC in abaxial cell fate determination in leaves, floral organs, and ovules. These plants showed distinctly narrow and curled leaves and a variety of floral defects.
The overexpression lines revealed an additional potential role for G2457 in the response to abiotic stress which has not previously been recognized in the published literature; all three of the 35S::G2457 lines tested performed better than wild-type controls on plates containing sodium chloride.
Utilities
Based on the effects of G2457 overexpression and the published data, the gene or its orthologs could potentially be used to modify leaf and flower, and fruit development.
Given the increased salt tolerance exhibited by the 35S::G2457 lines, the gene may be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in salinified soils, or under drought conditions.
G2459 (SEQ ID NO: 419)
Published Information
G2459 was identified by amino acid sequence similarity to the Arabidopsis Y ABBY1. Transcription factors from the Y ABBY family play an important role in specifying abaxial cell fate in leaves and floral organs (Siegfried et al. (1999) Development 126: 4117-4128). G2459 is found in the sequence of the chromosome 2 clone T9J22 map B68 (AC002505.3 GI:20196938), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2459 was analyzed through its ectopic overexpression in Arabidopsis. The overexpression of G2459 revealed a number of morphological changes, which were consistent with the previously defined role of Y ABBYs in abaxial cell fate determination in leaves, floral organs and ovules. All the T1 plants were generally small, slow developing, and produced rather dark, curled leaves compared to those of wild type.
Additionally, an effect was observed which has not been discussed in the public literature: G2459 overexpression resulted in accumulation of high levels of anthocyanins, particularly at early stages of seedling development. This effect was exacerbated by stress conditions such as high levels of glucose.
Utilities
Based on the published data, the gene could potentially be used to modify leaf and flower development. In particular, the gene or its equivalogs might be used to manipulate fruit traits.
The increased pigment levels and dark coloration observed in 35S::G2453 transformants point towards a number of utilities reducing the risk of ARMD by consumption of plants so altered. Given that the 35S::G2453 plants likely had increased chlorophyll levels, the gene might also be used to enhance photosynthetic capacity and yield. G2453 or its equivalogs could also be applied to alter pigment production for horticultural purposes and to increase stress resistance. Flavonoids have antimicrobial activity and could be used to engineer pathogen resistance. In addition, several flavonoid compounds have health promoting effects such as the inhibition of tumor growth, prevention of bone loss and the prevention of the oxidation of lipids. Since the phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathway (from which anthocyanins are produced) feeds into the pathways for the production of a number of other classes of secondary metabolites, such as lignins and tannins, changing the activity of G2453 or its equivalogs might also influence the levels of those types of compounds.
G2505 (SEQ ID NO: 425)
Published Information
G2505 is a novel member of the NAC family of transcription factors. G2505 corresponds to gene At4g10350, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information is available about the function(s) of G2505.
Experimental Observations
G2505 was expressed at low or non-detectable levels in most tissue types. Higher levels of transcript were found in roots compared to other tissues. No induction of G2505 expression in leaf tissue was detected in response to environmental stress-related conditions.
The effects of G2505 overexpression (overexpression construct P1533) were analyzed. Despite numerous repeated attempts, 35S::G2505 transformants could not be obtained and it was concluded that overexpression of the gene caused lethality during embryo or early seedling development.
Upon repeating the transformation with a new overexpression construct (P2776), the transformation frequency was very low and the few lines that were obtained were distinctly small and dark in coloration Only two of these lines produced sufficient seed for physiology assays to be performed. However, both of those lines displayed enhanced performance in a severe drought assay.
Utilities
The reduced sensitivity of 35S::G2505 lines in the dehydration stress assay indicated that the gene or its orthologs might be used to engineer crops with increased tolerance to drought, salt, freezing and chilling stress, or increased water use efficiency.
G2536 (SEQ ID NO: 431)
Published Information
G2536 is a novel member of the NAC family of transcription factors. G2536 corresponds to gene At3g44350, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information is available about the function(s) of G2536.
Experimental Observations
The complete sequence of G2536 was determined. The function of the gene was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. 35S::G2536 plants did not show consistent alterations in their response to the physiological analyses that were performed.
Overexpression of G2536 produced a striking effect on leaf development and caused both an increase in leaf size as well as an apparent delay in the onset of leaf senescence. At early stages, 35S::G2536 transformants appeared normal, except for a small number of lines, which displayed rather long petioles. However, towards the end of the rosette stage and the start of the inflorescence stage, a marked alteration in rosette morphology was noticeable; leaves were generally larger and broader than in wild type and often exhibited mild serrations on the margins. This effect became increasingly apparent as the plants aged. At the end of the lifecycle, the leaves of 35S::G2536 plants also remained green and showed a delay in senescence compared to wild type. Some of the 35S::G2536 lines showed a mild delay in the onset of flowering (up to about seven days in continuous light).
Utilities
The effects on leaf size and shape that were observed as a result of G2536 overexpression might also have commercial applications. Increased leaf size, or an extended period of leaf growth as a result of G2536 or ortholog expression modification, could increase photosynthetic capacity, and biomass, and have a positive effect on yield. The observed stay green phenotype or delay in the onset of senescence could also result in yield increases by increasing the period of photosynthetic productivity in source tissues.
G2550 (SEQ ID NO: 435)
Published Information
G2550 was initially identified within sequence released by the Arabidopsis genome initiative (gene F1B16.6 within BAC clone F1B16, chromosome I, GenBank accession, AC023754), as a gene encoding a novel homeodomain protein of the BEL1 lass. No public data are available pertaining to the function of this gene.
Experimental Observations
The boundaries of G2550 were determined by RACE experiments, and transgenic lines were generated in which the gene was overexpressed from a 35S promoter. These transformants exhibited a wild-type response to physiological assays, but displayed a number of morphological phenotypes. 35S::G2550 lines were dark in coloration, displayed alterations in leaf shape, and formed shorter more compact inflorescences than controls.
Utilities
The changes in morphology shown by the 35S::G2550 transformants indicated that the gene or its orthologs could be used to manipulate inflorescence architecture and branching patterns in commercial species, to create varieties with more compact forms. In particular, dwarf and compact forms of ornamental plants are extremely popular among consumers. They represent a lucrative market for breeders and growers alike, but currently for many varieties, suitable dwarf breeding lines are either unavailable or difficult to integrate into existing germ-lines. Therefore, currently, many ornamental plants are sprayed with expensive chemical growth regulators to reduce height and increase compactness. Overexpression of a gene with G2550 activity could potentially alleviate this requirement.
The altered coloration of 35S::G2550 plants reflects a change in biochemical composition, and thus the gene or its orthologs might be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs. For example, consumption of dark green leafy vegetables has been shown in clinical studies to reduce the risk of age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), the leading cause of blindness in elderly people. Given that the 35S::G2550 plants likely had increased chlorophyll levels, the gene might be used to enhance photosynthetic capacity and yield.
G2567 (SEQ ID NO: 441)
Published Information
G2567 corresponds to ARF16 (Hagen and Guilfoyle (2002) Plant Mol. Biol. 49: 373-385; Liscum and Reed (2002) Plant Mol. Biol. 49: 387-400). G2567 was identified in genomic sequence (BAC accession number AL161576).
Experimental Observations
The complete cDNA sequence of G2567 was determined. The function of this gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which G2567 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Plants overexpressing G2567 showed enhanced tolerance to chilling stress in a growth assay. These plants were wild-type in morphology.
Utilities
G2567 may be used to engineer crop plants that are more tolerant to chilling stress.
G2571 (SEQ ID NO: 445)
Published Information
G2571(At1g64380) is part of the BAC clone F15H21, GenBank accession number AC066689 (nid=10645388).
Experimental Observations.
The complete sequence of G2571 was determined and the gene was cloned from cDNA for overexpression. The function of the gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which G2571 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G2571 resulted reduced size, changes in coloration, branching patterns, and leaf and flower development. In particular, some of the lines showed a sympodial-like growth pattern in the inflorescence, similar to that shown by tomato plants. Thus, the gene could have a key role in regulating shoot meristem activity and branching patterns. G2571 overexpressing lines behaved similarly to the wild-type controls in all physiological assays performed.
Utilities
The alterations in shoot architecture seen in 35S::G2571 lines indicate that the gene might be used to manipulate inflorescence branching patterns. This could influence yield and could offer the potential for more effective harvesting techniques. For instance, the self pruning mutation of tomato results in a determinate growth pattern and facilitates mechanical harvesting (Pnueli et al. (1998) Plant Cell 13: 2687-2702.
G2579 (SEQ ID NO: 451)
Published Information
G2579 was identified as part of the clone T28N17 (GenBank accession AC069328).
Experimental Observations
The function of G2579 was analyzed using transgenic plants in which a cDNA clone of the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G2579 produced striking changes in leaf shape and flower development. 35S::G2579 transformants were rather small in stature and formed narrow curled leaves with short petioles. The flowers from these plants exhibited markedly wider carpels than those of wild type, which gave rise to somewhat stumpy club-like siliques. Interestingly, although the fertility of these lines was very poor, siliques appeared to grow out fairly extensively in many instances, indicating that the gene might be producing parthenocarpic effects (fruit development in the absence of seed set).
It is perhaps noteworthy that overexpression of G2579 produced similar effects on carpels to overexpression of another member of the AP2 family, G1796.
Additionally, one of three 35S::G2579 lines examined in physiology assays showed increased tolerance to chilling in a plate-based growth assay.
Utilities
Based on the morphological phenotypes associated with the overexpression of G2579, the gene or its equivalogs could be used to engineer plants with altered fertility or altered fruit size and shape. For example, the parthenocarpic effects that were apparently induced indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to aid the production of seedless fruit varieties.
The results of physiological assays indicate that G2579 or its equivalogs could also be used to generate crop plants that have increased abiotic stress tolerance, and in particular, better growth under cold conditions.
G2585 (SEQ ID NO: 453)
Published Information
G2585 corresponds to gene At5g01900, and it has also been described as WRKY62. No information is available about the function(s) of G2585.
Experimental Observations
The complete sequence of G2585 was experimentally determined. The function of the gene was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Seeds from four out of eighteen of the 35S::G2585 primary transformants were larger than those of control plants grown in the same flats. However, in all other respects, G2585 overexpression lines appeared wild-type.
Utilities
G2585 could be used to alter seed size, shape and composition resulting in higher yielding crop plants.
G2617 (SEQ ID NO: 467)
Published Information
G2617 (At5g06070) was identified in the sequence of TAC clone K16F4 (GenBank accession number AP002030) based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other C2H2 related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about the function of G2617.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2617 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter.
Overexpression of G2617 severely affected plant growth and development and produced changes in seedling growth rate, rosette phyllotaxy, leaf and flower morphology, overall plant size, and seed yield. At early stages, many of the 35S::G2617 T1 plants appeared to develop faster and seemed more advanced than wild-type, but later became small and stunted. However, this effect on seedling development was not observed in the T2 lines.
Utilities
The developmental effects on G2617 overexpression indicated that the gene might be used to modify growth rate and architecture. Accelerated seedling growth would allow a crop to become established faster. This would minimize exposure to stress conditions at early stages of growth, when the plants are most sensitive. Additionally, it might allow a crop to grow faster than competing weed species. Furthermore, the changes in silique shape displayed by the 35S::G2617 plants, indicated that the gene may be used to alter fruit traits.
G2650 (SEQ ID NO: 483)
Published Information
G2650 is in the sequence of BAC T22D6, GenBank accession number AL357612, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information regarding the function of G2650 is available.
Experimental Observations.
The full-length cDNA sequence of G2650 was determined, after which the function of this gene was analyzed in transgenic plants in which G2650 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Plants overexpressing G2650 showed a number of effects that indicate that the gene can influence light regulated developmental processes. 35S::G2650 plants displayed long hypocotyls, elongated petioles, and formed narrow leaves that were held in a more upright orientation than those of controls. About half of the T1 lines and all of the T2 lines examined flowered earlier than wild type. Under 12-hour conditions, the T2 plants developed excessive numbers of small axillary rosette leaves, which may eventually result in an overall increase in biomass. G2650 overexpressing lines also showed enhanced tolerance to chilling stress in a growth assay.
Utilities
Based on the overexpression phenotypes, G2650 could have a number of applications.
(1) Manipulation of light regulated development:
G2650 could influence shade avoidance. Eliminating shading responses might allow increased planting densities with subsequent yield enhancement.
(2) The gene might also be useful in manipulating flowering time. In particular, G2650 could be applied to accelerate flowering or eliminate any requirements for vernalization.
(3) Enhanced chilling stress tolerance.
(4) Altered meristem activity. The increased activity of axillary meristems in the rosettes of 35S::G2650 plants indicates that the gene might be used to increase leaf numbers and biomass. Alternatively, the gene might be used to modulate branching patterns.
G2661 (SEQ ID NO: 487)
Published Information
The sequence of G2661 was obtained from the Arabidopsis genome sequencing project, GenBank accession number AL161746, nid=7327833, based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other bHLH related proteins in Arabidopsis. 
Experimental Observations
The function of this gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which G2661 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. G2661 overexpressors showed greener cotyledons on media containing high glucose compared to wild-type controls. This result indicated that G2661 may be involved in sugar sensing. Plants overexpressing G2661 were also found to be slightly smaller, darker, and slower developing than control plants in a small number of transgenic lines.
Utilities
The sugar sensing phenotype of G2661 indicated that this gene may be useful for altering source-sink relationships or other sugar regulated processes.
G2691 (SEQ ID NO: 497)
Published Information
G2691 (At1g25470) was identified as part of the BAC clone F2J7, GenBank accession number AC079281 (nid=10092314).
Experimental Observations
The complete sequence of G2691 was determined. The gene was cloned from cDNA for overexpression. The function of the gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which G2691 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. G2691 overexpressing lines were morphologically wild-type. One out of three lines overexpressing G2691 showed increased seedling vigor (manifested by increased expansion of the cotyledons) in germination assays on high salt compared to wild-type controls.
Utilities
G2691 could potentially be used to increase or facilitate seed germination and seedling growth under adverse environmental conditions, in particular salt stress.
G2694 (SEQ ID NO: 499)
Published Information
G2694 (At3g35770) belongs to a set of transcription factors termed OTHER. This group is comprised of regulatory genes that have been shown to bind DNA in a sequence specific manner and/or are presumed to be transcription factors based on their biochemical properties. In addition, the genes in this category do not belong to an established gene family and are, in effect, singletons in the genome. G2694 corresponds to STERILE APETALA (SAP) that was identified by Byzova et al. ((1999) Genes Dev. 13: 1002-1014). A mutation in SAP in Arabidopsis affects several aspects of reproductive growth including inflorescence, floral organ and ovule development. Mutants in the SAP gene fail to make female gametophytic tissue, and megasporogenesis arrests after the first meiotic division. The internode distance in sap mutants is also reduced, petals are narrow, stamens are short and malformed, and petals and stamens are reduced in number. SAP genetically interacts with both AG and AP2 during inflorescence development. While SAP seems to function synergistically with AP2, the authors hypothesize that SAP is a negative regulator of AG (Byzova et al. (1999) supra).
Experimental Observations
The function of this gene was analyzed using transgenic plants in which G2694 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G2694 produced very striking alterations in seedling size, leaf shape, delayed flowering, and changes in inflorescence and flower morphology. Some of the effects observed in the inflorescence were somewhat similar to those seen in sap mutants by Byzova et al. (1999) supra. However, the effects observed during the vegetative phase were not described for sap. No additional phenotypes were observed in physiological assays.
At the earliest stages, 35S::G2694 seedlings appeared larger than wild type. About two weeks after planting, the seedlings displayed markedly long petioles, narrow leaf blades, and had leaves held in a more vertical orientation than in wild type. Such effects indicated that the gene influences light-regulated developmental programs. Leaves were slightly dark in color and developed an extremely curled and twisted morphology as they expanded. In addition to these effects, the plants produced visible flower buds approximately 5 days later than controls under continuous light conditions. Following the switch to flowering, 35S::G2694 transformants formed inflorescences that had a very leafy appearance; typically an increased number of coflorescence nodes, and a higher order of branching was apparent. Changes in flower morphology were also seen; sepals were frequently enlarged and bract-like, petals and stamens were somewhat contorted, pollen production was low, and carpels were wider than in wild type. Such abnormal flowers were of low fertility and fewer siliques set than in control plants. However, siliques that did develop had a wide flattened appearance.
The morphological effects observed in overexpression lines fit with the hypothesis that SAP interacts with genes such as AGAMOUS, APETALA2 and CURLY LEAF. However, given the pleiotropy of the phenotype, such interactions are likely to be complex, and clearly affect many aspects of plant development.
Utilities
Based on the morphological effects of G2694 overexpression, a wide range of potential commercial applications for the gene or its orthologs exist, including:
(1) Modification of light regulated developmental processes such as shade avoidance.
(2) Modification of vegetative growth and flowering time.
The late flowering and excessive vegetative growth shown by 35S::G2694 lines indicated that the gene or its orthologs might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
That 35S::G2694 seedlings were larger than wild type at early stages, indicated that the gene could be used to confer a growth advantage at early stages and allow a crop to attain more rapid ground cover. Additionally, if the slightly dark coloration of 35S::G2694 plants reflects enhanced chlorophyll and/or carotenoid levels, this could enhance photosynthetic capacity and thereby lead to yield improvements. Finally, the changes in leaf shape seen in transgenic lines indicated that the gene could be used to produce novel ornamental forms.
(3) Modification of flower and fruit structure
The dark coloration of 35S::G2694 lines may reflect an increase in biochemical composition, and thus G2694 or its orthologs may be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield.
G2717 (SEQ ID NO: 505)
Published Information
G2717 corresponds to gene At1g49950, and it has also been described as Telomere Repeat Binding Factor 1 (TRBF1). No information is available about the function(s) of G2717.
Experimental Observations
The function of the gene was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. 35S::G2717 lines were wild type with respect to their morphology and development. However, the G2717 overexpressors appeared to be more tolerant to osmotic stress in germination assays. Seedlings from all three transgenic lines were larger than wild-type seedlings at the same developmental stage on control media.
In a soil based drought assay, G2717 overexpressing plants were significantly larger and greener than wild-type control plants.
Utilities
Based on the increased salt, osmotic stress and drought tolerance exhibited by the 35S::G2717 plants in physiology assays, this gene or its equivalogs may be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in salinified soils, or under drought conditions.
Since 35S::G2717 seedlings were slightly larger than controls, the gene or its equivalogs could also be used to accelerate the rate of germination and growth of plants.
G2718 (SEQ ID NO: 507)
Published Information
G2718 (AT1G01380) was identified in the BAC clone, F6F3 (GenBank accession AC023628). Two highly related genes, TRY and CPC have been implicated in epidermal cell specification. A lateral inhibition model proposes that TRY (G1816) and CPC (G225) function as repressors of trichome and atrichoblast cell fate (Shellmann et al. (2002) EMBO J. 21: 5036-5046). A comprehensive review on epidermal cell-fate specification has been published recently (Schiefelbein (2003) Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6: 74-78).
Experimental Observations
The function of G2718 was studied using plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G2718 resulted in a glabrous phenotype. The effect was highly penetrant, being observed in all primary transformants and each of three independent T2 lines. All of the T1 lines showed a very strong phenotype and completely lacked trichomes on leaves and stems. A comparably severe effect was observed in one of the three T2 populations, whereas the other two T2 populations each exhibited a weaker phenotype, indicating that the effect might have become partially silenced between the generations. Trichomes were present in these weaker lines, but at a much lower density than in wild type.
In addition to the effects on trichome density, 35S::G2718 transformants were also generally slightly smaller than wild type controls.
The phenotypic effects above were observed in the 35S::G2718 as well as in all 35S lines from members of the G2718 clade (G225, G226, G1816, and G682). Similarly, 35S::TF lines from the G2718 clade all had increased root hair formation, reduced anthocyanin levels, and showed improved growth under nitrogen limiting conditions, indicating that the genes improve nutrient uptake. It should be noted however, that due to the apparent silencing of the transgene in the T2 generation, only two of three 35S::G2718 lines examined displayed these phenotypes.
Utilities
The phenotypic effects of G2718 overexpression, such as the increase in root hair formation and the increase in seedling vigor observed in a root growth assay on N-limiting media, indicates that the gene or its equivalogs could be used to engineer plants with increased tolerance to abiotic stresses such as nutrient limitation, drought, salt, heat or cold.
The enhanced performance of G2718 overexpression lines under low nitrogen conditions indicates that the gene or its equivalogs could be used to engineer crops that could thrive under conditions of reduced nitrogen availability.
G2718 or its equivalogs could also be used to alter anthocyanin production or trichome formation. and production of secondary biochemicals (e.g., lipophilic terpenes) by trichomes.
G2723 (SEQ ID NO: 509)
Published Information
G2723 is a member of the Myb-related family of transcription factors. The gene corresponds to gene At1g19490, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information is available about the function(s) of G2723.
Experimental Observations
The complete sequence of G2723 was confirmed, and the function of the gene was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. 35S::G2723 plants did not show consistent alterations in their response to the physiological analyses that were performed.
With respect to the morphology and development of the transgenic plants, overexpression of G2723 produced a moderate delay in the onset of flowering in Arabidopsis by up to approximately two weeks under continuous light conditions. The phenotype was apparent in eleven out of eighteen of the primary transformants and each of three T2 populations that were examined.
Utilities
The delayed flowering displayed by 35S::G2723 transformants indicates that the gene or its orthologs can be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases Given the effects of G2723 overexpression, it is likely that the activity of the gene or its orthologs can be modified to accelerate flowering or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
G2741 (SEQ ID NO: 511)
Published Information
G2741 was identified in the sequence of BAC F12A12, GenBank accession number AL133314, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No functional information is available about G2741.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2741 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Five of the eighteen 35S::G2741 lines were significantly delayed in flowering and exhibited greater vegetative biomass than wild-type. No altered phenotypes were detected in any of the physiological assays.
It should be noted that G2741 is closely related to G1435, which also produced late flowering plants when overexpressed.
Utilities
The delayed flowering displayed by 35S::G2741 transformants indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases. Given the effects of G2741 overexpression, it is possible that the activity of the gene or its equivalogs could be modified to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
G2754 (SEQ ID NO: 517)
Published Information
The transcription regulator G2754 was identified by amino acid sequence similarity to proteins of the SWI/SNF family of chromatin remodeling factors. G2754 is found in the sequence of the chromosome 5, P1 clone MSN2 (GenBank accession number AC005936.1; nid=3702737), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No additional public information related to the functional characterization of G2754 is available.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2754 was analyzed through its ectopic overexpression in Arabidopsis; 35S::G2754 seedlings were slightly pale in coloration, displayed long hypocotyls, elongated petioles, and had leaves held in a more upright orientation. Many of the lines also flowered noticeably earlier than controls. Following the switch to flowering, the inflorescences from 35S::G2754 plants had a spindly appearance and exhibited somewhat increased internode elongation compared to wild type. The above effects were observed in ten out of eighteen of the primary transformants and each of three independent T2 lines.
Utilities
The phenotype of plants overexpressing G2754 indicated that the gene or its orthologs might be used to manipulate developmental processes regulated by light, such as shade avoidance. Eliminating shading responses could lead to increased planting densities with subsequent yield enhancement.
The gene or its orthologs might also be useful in modifying flowering time. In particular, G2754 could be applied to accelerate flowering or eliminate any requirements for vernalization.
G2763 (SEQ ID NO: 521)
Published Information
The sequence of G2763 was obtained from Arabidopsis genomic sequencing project, GenBank accession number AB026636, nid=4757392, based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other bHLH related proteins in Arabidopsis. 
Experimental Observations
The 5′ and 3′ ends of G2763 were experimentally determined by RACE. The full-length cDNA clone corresponding to G2763 was isolated in-house from the screening of Arabidopsis cDNA libraries.
The function of G2763 was assessed by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the cDNA was constitutively expressed from the 35S CaMV promoter. Overexpression of G2763 resulted in plants that displayed a mild delay in the onset of flowering, compared to wild-type controls. Additionally, a number of the plants were slightly small and appeared dark in coloration, particularly at later stages of development. In the physiological assays, G2763 overexpressors have a sugar sensing phenotype in a germination assay on media containing high glucose. The small seedling phenotype was confirmed in a repeat experiment on all three individual line. In addition, all three lines of G2763 were more sensitive to chilling stress in the chilling growth assay. Seedlings were small and in the case of line 5 had more anthocyanin accumulation.
The sugar sensing phenotype of G2763 overexpressing plants may be related to the late flowering phenotype. Sugars are central regulatory molecules that control several aspects of plant physiology, metabolism, and development, including flowering.
Utilities
The delayed flowering displayed by 35S::G2763 transformants indicates that the gene might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
G2763 might be used to generate crop plants with altered sugar sensing.
G2763 could also be used to generate crop plants enhanced resistance to chilling.
If the dark coloration of 35S::G2763 lines reflects an increase in biochemical composition, the gene might be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield.
G2768 (SEQ ID NO: 525 and SEQ ID NO: 2118)
Published Information
The sequence of G2768 was obtained from the Arabidopsis genome sequencing project, GenBank accession number AB018117 (nid=3702735). It corresponds to At5g47430, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2768 was assessed by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the cDNA was constitutively expressed from the 35S CaMV promoter.
The G2768 clone within the overexpression construct (P15431; comprising SEQ ID NO: 2118) encodes a product that lacks 227 amino acids at the carboxy-terminus compared to the full-length wild-type protein. Thus, it is possible that the morphological phenotypes seen in plants transformed with P15431 represent dominant negative type effects.
Overexpression of G2768 produced dramatic changes in flower morphology; flowers from 35S::G2768 transformants were strikingly similar to those of mutants for the MADS-box gene, AGAMOUS (A G, Bowman et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 37-52; Bowman et al. (1991a) Development 112: 1-20; Yanofsky et al. (1990) Nature 346: 35-39; Coen and Meyerowitz (1991) Nature 353: 31-37).
In a typical 35S::G2768 flower, a general loss of determinate floral meristem growth was apparent, such that a new flower bud developed within, or in place of, the central carpels. This pattern was then reiterated and the fourth whorl of the secondary flower in turn gave rise to a tertiary flower bud and so on, resulting in a chain of flowers, each emerging from the center of the previous one. The phenotype was observed to varying extents, and in the most severe cases, a central carpel was converted completely into a new flower bud. In other instances, however, the conversion was incomplete; fourth whorl organs developed as a contorted pair of carpel-like structures, which when dissected open, were seen to contain the vestigial floral organs of a secondary flower. Additionally, stamen development was compromised, and in the severest cases, six petals developed in place of stamens in the third whorls. As a result of these changes, 35S::G2768 flowers were infertile and failed to yield seed.
The features described above are identical to those displayed by AG mutants, indicating that G2768 might interact with AG during the development of wild type flowers. In particular, AG is specifically expressed in the third and fourth whorls of developing flowers, where it specifies stamen and carpel identity respectively, and prevents indeterminate growth of the floral meristem (Bowman et al. (1991b) Plant Cell 3: 749-758; Drews et al. (1991) Cell 65: 991-1002). Thus, in wild-type plants, G2768 might have a role in preventing AG expression in first and second floral whorls.
Additionally, G2768 overexpression produced changes in leaf shape, such that those organs became larger and flatter than in wild type.
Utilities
Based on the effects of G2768 overexpression, the gene or its equivalogs could be used to manipulate flower structure and development. A wide range of applications could be envisaged, including the following:

    
    
        (1) production of larger showier flowers for the ornamental market;
        (2) the gene or its equivalogs might be used to engineer sterility in trees and grasses to prevent escape of pollen from genetically engineered plants;
        (3) the sterility of the 35S::G2768 flowers, and failure of seed set, delays senescence, which would increase duration of the flowering period in ornamentals;
        (4) the gene or its equivalogs could be applied to artichokes to eliminate the choke;
        (5) the gene or its equivalogs could be applied to roses; increased numbers of petals might be of interest to the rose oil industry.
    
    


Given the increase in leaf size observed in 35S::G2768 lines, the gene or its equivalogs may also be applied to increase biomass and yield in crop plants.
G2771 (SEQ ID NO: 527 and SEQ ID NO: 2119)
Published Information
G2771 corresponds to gene AT4G28810, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information is available about the function(s) of G2771.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2771 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G2771 produced striking alterations in leaf morphology and a marked delay in the onset of flowering. The leaves of 35S::G2771 lines were noticeably narrower, darker, and more curled than were those of controls, particularly at late stages. At early stages, plants grown on plates were observed to show long hypocotyls and were rather pale in coloration, indicating that G2771 might influence light-regulated development. These lines also showed reduced accumulation of anthocyanins when subjected to a chilling growth assays.
It should be noted that the G2771 overexpression construct, contained a truncated clone of the gene (SEQ ID NO: 2119); the above phenotypes might therefore represent dominant negative effects.
Utilities
Based on the morphological effects of overexpression, G2771 or its equivalogs might be used to manipulate leaf shape. In particular, this could be used to create novel forms for the ornamental plant market. This effect might also have other commercial applications. Increased leaf size, or an extended period of leaf growth, could increase photosynthetic capacity, and biomass, and have a positive effect on yield. The dark coloration observed in 35S::G2771 transformants point towards a number of utilities. Consumption of dark green leafy vegetables has been shown in clinical studies to reduce the risk of ARMD.
Additionally, the delayed flowering displayed by 35S::G2771 transformants indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
G2771 or its equivalogs could also have a role in modulating developmental processes regulated by light, such as shade avoidance. Eliminating shading responses could allow for increased planting densities with subsequent yield enhancement.
G2771 or its equivalogs might also be used to generate crop plants that have better growth under cold conditions. The growth of many crops is very sensitive to cool temperatures. A gene that enhances growth under chilling conditions could result in enhanced yields.
G2776 (SEQ ID NO: 529)
Published Information
The sequence of G2776 was obtained from the Arabidopsis genome sequencing project, GenBank accession number AL161592, nid=7270751, based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other bHLH related proteins in Arabidopsis. 
Experimental Observations
The function of G2776 was assessed by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the cDNA was constitutively expressed from the 35S CaMV promoter. G2776 overexpressors have a sugar sensing or osmotic tolerant phenotype in a germination assay on media containing high sucrose. Seedlings of 35S::G2776 transgenic lines were larger with green cotyledons compared with wild-type seedlings grown on sucrose. The result could indicate that G2776 may be involved in sugar sensing and/or osmotic stress tolerance.
Utilities
The sugar sensing phenotype of G2776 indicates that this gene may be useful for altering source-sink relationships or other sugar regulated processes.
If the phenotype of 35S::G2776 seedlings on sucrose plates reflects a general resistance to osmotic stress conditions, the gene might be used to engineer plants that are more resilient to abiotic stresses such as drought, salt and/or freezing.
G2784 (SEQ ID NO: 537 and SEQ ID NO: 2120)
Published Information
G2784 corresponds to gene AT5G57770, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative.
Experimental Observations
The 5′ and 3′ ends of G2784 were determined by RACE. The function of G2784 was analyzed using transgenic plants in which G2784 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter.
Overexpression of G2784 (SEQ ID NO: 2120) produced marked changes in overall plant architecture. 35S::G2784 transformants, were small, slow developing and exhibited curled dark leaves. Additionally, plants from two of the T2 lines exhibited abnormal inflorescence morphology and produced secondary shoots that grew downwards.
35S::G2784 lines showed more tolerance to cold stress in a germination assay. When the assay was repeated on individual lines, all three lines showed enhanced seeding vigor when germinated under cold conditions.
Utilities
G2784 or its equivalogs could be used to engineer enhanced cold germination in plants. The germination of many crops is very sensitive to cold temperatures. A gene that would enhance germination and seedling vigor in the cold would have tremendous utility in allowing seeds to be planted earlier in the season with a higher survival rate.
The morphological changes exhibited by 35S::G2784 plants indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to manipulate plant architecture. In particular, G2784 could be applied to produce novel leaf and shoot morphologies for the ornamental markets.
Additionally, if the altered coloration of 35S::G2784 plants reflects a change in biochemical composition, the gene or its equivalogs may be used to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity to improve yield.
G2826 (SEQ ID NO: 545)
Published Information
G2826 (At1g68360) is in BAC T22E19 (GenBank accession number AC016447) and was identified based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other zinc finger C2H2-related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about the function of G2826.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2826 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Few primary transformants were produced, indicating that the gene can be lethal when overexpressed at high levels. Overexpression of G2826 resulted in plants that were small and slow developing. Some individuals developed aerial rosettes at coflorescence nodes, indicating a disruption in phase change in the inflorescence. Flowers were also small and had defects in organ formation, pollen production, and yielded few seeds. Strikingly, flowers also displayed increased trichome density on sepals and often possessed ectopic trichomes on the carpels. On dissecting the carpels, trichome-like structures developing from the internal walls were also apparent. Some plants also had floral organs converted towards a bract-like identity. The changes in morphology produced by overexpression of this gene is indicative of heterochronic shifts (i.e., cells in various lineages and tissues adopt fates that are normally associated with cells from other developmental stages). For example, trichomes are normally associated with vegetative rather than reproductive organs. Additionally, aerial rosettes occur when a secondary inflorescence meristem develops in a manner comparable to a primary shoot meristem during the vegetative phase of growth.
Utilities
The morphological effects of G2826 overexpression indicate a number of potential applications relating to increasing or changing trichome density: Thus, the use of G2826 and its homologs to increase trichome density, size or type may therefore have profound utilities in so called molecular farming practices and increasing the yield of cotton fibers.
If the effects on trichome patterning and/or aerial rosette formation reflect a general change in heterochronic processes, G2826 or other clade members might be used to modify the way meristems and/or cells develop during different phases of the plant life cycle. In particular, altering the timing of phase changes could afford positive effects on yield and biomass production.
G2830 (SEQ ID NO: 547)
Published Information
G2830 (At5g42640) was identified in the sequence of P1 clone MFO20, GenBank accession number AB013391, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. There is no published or public information about the function of G2830.
Experimental Observations
G2830 is expressed at a low level in embryos and siliques as determined by RT-PCR analysis. Expression of G2830 was not detected in other tissues. Previously, a line homozygous for a T-DNA insertion in G2830 was used to determine the function of this gene. G2830 mutant plants showed an increase in seed oil content.
The phenotype of 35S::G2830 lines has now been analyzed. No consistent effects on Arabidopsis growth and development were found in morphological assays. However, a proportion of plants from a single 35S::G2830 T2 line performed better than wild-type plants when germinated on media with low nitrogen supplemented with sucrose or with sucrose plus glutamine.
Utilities
G2830 or its equivalogs may be used to increase seed oil content of plants, which may be used to improve seed oil yield or increase the caloric content of foods.
Because expression of G2830 is embryo and silique specific, its promoter could be useful for targeted gene expression in these tissues. That fact that 35S::G2830 transformants produced less anthocyanin on high sucrose plus glutamine indicated that G2830 might be used to modify carbon and nitrogen status, and hence assimilate partitioning.
G2838 (SEQ ID NO: 555)
Published Information
G2838 was identified in the sequence of BAC F15M7, GenBank accession number AP002543, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. There is no other published or public information about the function of G2838.
Experimental Observations
The 5′ and 3′ ends of G2838 were determined by RACE PCR. The complete sequence of G2838 was determined. The function of G2838 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Many of the 35S::G2838 seedling transformants had large cotyledons compared to control plants. As plants matured, many lines became rather dark in coloration, showed a delay in the onset of flowering, and an increase in vegetative characteristics in the inflorescence. In some instances, aerial rosettes were seen at coflorescence nodes, and in other cases flowers had shoot like characteristics. Sepals from some flowers had a bract-like appearance and an increase in trichome density. Many lines showed non-specific flower abnormalities; floral organs were often small and contorted and pollen production was poor. As a result, seed yield from many of the lines was rather poor.
Utilities
The morphological effects of G2838 overexpression indicate a number of applications relating to increasing or changing trichome density by modification of the expression of this transcription factor or its equivalogs. Thus, the use of G2838 and its homologs to increase trichome density, size or type may therefore have profound utilities in so-called molecular farming practices and increasing the yield of cotton fibers. Since the mallow family is closely related to the Brassica family in which Arabidopsis is located, genes involved in trichome formation are likely to have homologs that function in cotton.
If the effects on trichome patterning and/or aerial rosette formation reflect a general change in heterochronic processes, G2838 or other clade members, might be used to modify the way meristems and/or cells develop during different phases of the plant life cycle, or manipulate flowering time. In particular, altering the timing of phase changes could afford positive effects on yield and biomass production. The enlarged size of 35S::G2838 seedlings might also be interpreted as a heterochronic shift, and indicated that the gene might be applied to crops in order to expedite ground coverage.
The dark coloration of 35S::G2838 lines might reflect a change in biochemical composition or chlorophyll content. Thus, the gene might be applied to improve the nutraceutical value of foodstuffs, or increase photosynthetic capacity in crop plants, to improve yield.
G2839 (SEQ ID NO: 557)
Published Information
G2839 (At3g46080) was identified in the sequence of BAC F12M12 (GenBank accession number AL355775) based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other C2H2 related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about the function of G2839.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2839 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Few primary transformants were generated. This indicates that G2839 overexpression can be lethal. T1 lines displayed stunted growth and development, and yielded very few or zero seeds. Inflorescences were poorly developed. In one line, flower pedicels were very short and flowers and siliques were oriented downwards. G2839 overexpressors showed a phenotype in a germination assay on media containing high sucrose: seedlings were green and had high germination rates. Thus, the gene appeared to influence sugar sensing and/or osmotic stress responses.
G2839 is closely related to G354 and G353. Flower phenotypes in which pedicels were very short and flowers and siliques were oriented downwards have been described for G353 and G354 and are also similar to the brevipedicellus mutant (Koornnefet al. (1983) J. Heredity 1983; 74: 265-272; Venglat et al. (2002) Proc. Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 99:47304735; Douglas et al. (2002) Plant Cell 14:547-558. Interestingly 35S::G353 lines also showed increased resistance to osmotic stress.
Utilities
The phenotypes observed in physiology assays indicate that G2839 might be used to generate crop plants with altered sugar sensing. If the physiological phenotype is related to osmotic stress, the gene could be used to engineer cold and dehydration tolerance.
The morphological phenotype shown by 35S::G2839 lines indicate that the gene might be used to alter inflorescence architecture. In particular, a reduction in pedicel length and a change in the position at which flowers and fruits are held, might influence harvesting or pollination efficiency. Additionally, such changes might produce attractive novel forms for the ornamental markets.
G2854 (SEQ ID NO: 567)
Published Information
The sequence of G2854 was obtained from the Arabidopsis genome sequencing project, GenBank accession number AL161566, nid=7269538, based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other ACBF-like related proteins in Arabidopsis. 
Experimental Observations
The 5′ and 3′ ends of G2854 were determined by RACE. The function of G2854 was analyzed using transgenic plants in which G2854 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. 35S::G2854 transformants showed increased germination efficiency on sucrose plates compared to wild-type controls.
Utilities
G2854 may be used to generate crop plants with altered sugar sensing.
G2859 (SEQ ID NO: 569)
Published Information
G2859 corresponds to gene AT1G73830, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information is available about the function(s) of G2859.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2859 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. 35S::G2859 transgenic plants produced marked changes in Arabidopsis seedling morphology, coloration, leaf shape, and inflorescence development. 35S::G2859 transformants appeared pale in coloration during all phases of the life cycle. At early stages, the seedlings displayed rather long hypocotyls and long oval shaped cotyledons. Such a phenotype could indicate that G2859 was influencing light regulated developmental programs. Later, the plants formed leaves were rather flat and had mild serrations on the margins. Following the switch to reproductive growth, 35S::G2859 inflorescences became increasingly proliferated and bushy as the plants aged, exhibited very thin stems, long narrow curled cauline leaves, and carried flowers that were rather small and had poorly developed organs.
G2859 overexpressing lines behaved similarly to the wild-type controls in all physiological assays performed.
Utilities
Based on the effects of G2859 overexpression, the gene or its orthologs could be used to modify light-regulated developmental processes such as shade avoidance. Additionally, G2859 could be used to manipulate inflorescence architecture and generate plants with a denser bushier shoot structure.
G2885 (SEQ ID NO: 579)
Published Information
G2885 was identified in the sequence of genomic clone K21L19.7, GenBank accession number AB024029, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. It is a member of the response regulator class of GARP proteins, and was recently named ARR18 (Hwang et al. (2002) Plant Physiol. 129: 500-515). No functional information is available about G2885.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2885 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G2885 produced highly pleiotropic effects on Arabidopsis development, including alterations in meristem initiation and growth, cell differentiation, leaf shape, flower morphology, overall plant size, and rate of senescence. Most strikingly, two T2 lines showed secondary rosettes of leaves developing from the adaxial surface of cotyledons. This phenotype was identical to that seen with overexpression of a truncated ARR1 (G1493) protein lacking its response regulator domain. Callus-like outgrowths were also noted on the stems of two T1 plants, consistent with the observation of disordered cell proliferation in the plants overexpressing a truncated ARR1 (Sakai et al. (2001) Science 294: 1519-1521). ARR1 is known to function in cytokinin signal transduction, and G2885 is therefore also likely to function in cytokinin response. G2885 may be a stronger activator than ARR1, since the ectopic rosettes did not appear in plants expressing an intact ARR1 protein (Sakai et al. (2001) supra; G1493). In physiology assays, 35S::G2885 lines were more sensitive to cold conditions than wild-type plants, indicating that the gene can influence the response to abiotic stress.
Utilities
The overexpression phenotypes of G2885 indicated that the gene regulates meristem activity and stem cell identity. As such, the gene or its orthologs could have applications in cell cultures lines, or in transformation or micro-propagation systems, where regeneration of shoots from callus is currently problematic.
Based on the increased sensitivity to cold exhibited by the 35S::G2885 lines, this gene or its orthologs could be used to engineer cold tolerance. The germination of many crops is very sensitive to cold temperatures. A gene that altered sensitivity to cold would have utility in understanding the sensory transduction pathway for the regulation of growth and development by temperature. Understanding how plants respond to temperature could lead to plants with enhanced germination and seedling vigor in the cold and have utility in allowing seeds to be planted earlier in the growing season with a higher survival rate.
G2907 (SEQ ID NO: 587 and SEQ ID NO: 2122)
Published Information
G2907 has been described as AtSR1 (Arabidopsis thaliana Signal-Responsive genes; Yang and Poovaiah (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277: 45049-45058). The authors have shown that the protein contains a functional calmodulin-binding domain in addition to the DNA binding domain. AtSR1 specifically recognizes a novel 6-bp motif (CGCC box). Expression analysis indicates that AtSR1 transcript levels increase in response to different signals and stresses such as ethylene, methyl jasmonate, hydrogen peroxide, heat, cold, UV light and sodium chloride (Yang and Poovaiah (2002) supra). G2907 also corresponds to sequence 2286 from patent publication WO0216655 A2 (2001) on stress-regulated genes, transgenic plants and methods of use. No functional characterization in planta has been published so far.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2907 was analyzed using transgenic plants in which a cDNA clone of the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G2907 (SEQ ID NO: 2122) markedly accelerated the onset of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. This phenotype was apparent in three independent 35S::G2907 T2 lines, and was confirmed when the lines were re-grown for a second time. For unknown reasons, however, the phenotype was not noted in the T1 generation.
35S::G2907 plants were indistinguishable from wild-type controls in all physiology assays performed.
Utilities
G2907 or its equivalogs may have utility in altering senescence-related processes. Although leaf senescence is thought to be an evolutionary adaptation to recycle nutrients, the ability to control senescence in an agricultural setting may have value. For example, a delay in leaf senescence in some maize hybrids is associated with a significant increase in yields and a delay of a few days in the senescence of soybean plants can have a large impact on yield as well. Delayed flower senescence may also generate plants that retain their blossoms longer, this could impact yield and may be of potential interest to the ornamental horticulture industry.
G2913 (SEQ ID NO: 589)
Published Information
G2913 (At1g76110) was identified as part of the BAC clone T23E18 (GenBank accession AC009978).
Experimental Observations
The function of G2913 was analyzed using transgenic plants in which a cDNA clone of the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. In an assay intended to determine whether the transgene expression could alter carbon and nitrogen sensing, 35S::G2913 seedlings contained less anthocyanins (and in some cases were larger) than wild-type controls grown on high sucrose/N-plates. The transgenic seedlings were also greener on high sucrose/N-/Gln plates.
Utilities
The enhanced performance of G2913 overexpression lines under low nitrogen conditions indicated that the gene or its orthologs can be used to engineer crops that could thrive under conditions of reduced nitrogen availability.
G2930 (SEQ ID NO: 591)
Published Information
The sequence of G2930 was obtained from the Arabidopsis genome sequencing project, GenBank accession number AC016972, nid=6714311, based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other bHLH related proteins in Arabidopsis. 
Experimental Observations
The complete sequence of G2930 was determined experimentally. The function of G2930 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G2930 resulted in plants that were more tolerant to chilling stress in a growth assay compared to control plants. However, overexpression of G2930 produced no consistent effects on Arabidopsis morphology.
Utilities
G2930 could be used to generate crop plants that are more tolerant to chilling stress.
G2933 (SEQ ID NO: 593)
Published Information
The sequence of G2933 was obtained from Arabidopsis genomic sequencing project, GenBank accession number AL138655, nid=6899905, based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other bHLH related proteins in Arabidopsis. 
Experimental Observations
The function of G2933 was assessed by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the cDNA was constitutively expressed from the 35S CaMV promoter. A small number of G2933 overexpression lines produced larger seeds than wild-type controls. The result indicates that G2933 is involved in the regulation of sink-source relationship in plants. In addition, seedlings of 35S::G2933 transgenic lines showed more tolerance to chilling stress in a growth assay. When the assay was repeated on individual lines, all three lines analyzed showed the phenotype.
Utilities
G2933 might be used to modify sink-source relationship and thereby enhance seed yield.
This gene could also be used to generate crop plants that have better growth under cold conditions. The growth of many crops is very sensitive to cool temperatures. A gene that enhances growth under chilling conditions could result in enhanced yields.
G2969 (SEQ ID NO: 603)
Published Information
G2969 (At2g29660) was identified in the sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 2 clone T27A16 (GenBank accession number AC005496) based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other C2H2 related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about the function of G2969.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2969 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. G2969 overexpressing lines showed increased tolerance to sucrose and ABA in germination assays. The ABA and sucrose insensitivity indicates that the effect of overexpressing G2969 might cause tolerance to osmotic stress. 35S::G2969 plants were wild type in morphological analyses that were performed.
Utilities
G2969 appears to affect ABA sensitivity. ABA is one of key signal molecules in the stress response pathways. Therefore, G2969 may have a utility in modifying ABA responses such as seed dormancy, seed development, and cold and drought tolerances.
G2969 might also be used to generate crop plants with altered sugar sensing.
G2972 (SEQ ID NO: 605)
Published Information
G2972 (At3g29340) was identified in the sequence of P1 clone MUO10 (GenBank accession number AP001309) based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other C2H2 related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about G2972.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2972 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. G2972 overexpressing lines showed more tolerance to growth under low phosphate conditions. 35S::G2972 plants were wild type in morphological analyses that were performed.
Utilities
The response of 35S::G2972 seedlings to low phosphate conditions indicates that the gene could be used to manipulate nutrient uptake, or the ability to grow in poor nutrient soils.
G2979 (SEQ ID NO: 607)
Published Information
The transcription factor G2979 was identified by amino acid sequence similarity to the mammalian E2F proteins. It has been referenced in the public literature both as E2L2 and E2Ff (Kosugi and Ohashi, (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277: 16553-16558; Mariconti et al. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277: 9911-9919). G2979 is found in the sequence of the chromosome 3 BAC T22N4 (AC010676.6 GI:1240872), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. The G2979 product is thought to function as a repressor and be involved in restricting cell proliferation (Kosugi and Ohashi (2002) supra).
Experimental Observations
The function of G2979 was analyzed through its overexpression in Arabidopsis; 35S::G2979 lines displayed a mild delay in the onset of flowering, a marked increase in vegetative biomass, and increases in floral organ number. Its seems more likely that increased floral organ number and leaf size are related effects, and could both be due to a change in meristem activity, such as increased numbers of cells being allocated to organ primordia, or such cells going through additional rounds of cell division.
Utilities
Based on the substantially increased size of 35S::G2979 organs, the gene or its equivalogs could be used to increase plant biomass, thus improving yield. The increased flower size seen in such plants indicated that G2979 or its equivalogs could be applied to produce desirable flower and fruit traits.
Additionally, the slight delay in flowering observed in some of the 35S::G2979 lines indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to manipulate the timing of reproductive growth. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases. Conversely, it is possible that the activity of G2979 or its equivalogs could be modified to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
G2981 (SEQ ID NO: 609)
Published Information
G2981 is similar in its amino acid sequence to the mammalian DP2a, a dimerization partner to E2F required for the progression and arrest of the cell cycle in animals and plants. G2981 is in chromosome 5, BAC clone F12E4 (GenBank accession AL162751.1 GI:7378607), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No public information related to the functional characterization of G2981 is available.
Experimental Observations
The boundaries of G2981 were determined by RACE (Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends; a PCR-based method that facilitates the cloning of full-length cDNA sequences when a partial cDNA sequence is known) and its function was analyzed through overexpression in Arabidopsis. 35:: G2981 seedlings were larger and appeared to have less anthocyanin on plates that were nitrogen deficient, but which were supplemented with glutamine and high sucrose levels. This assay monitors the effect of carbon on nitrogen signaling through anthocyanin production.
Utilities
The enhanced performance of G2981 overexpression lines under low nitrogen conditions indicate that the gene could be used to engineer crops that could thrive under conditions of reduced nitrogen availability.
That 35S::G2981 lines make less anthocyanin on high sucrose plus glutamine, indicates G2981 might be used to modify carbon and nitrogen status, and hence assimilate partitioning.
G2982 (SEQ ID NO: 611)
Published Information
G2982 is found in the sequence of the chromosome 5, BAC clone T22P11 (GenBank accession AL162971.1 GI:7413630), released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. The gene appears to have a role in cell cycle control (Magyar et al. (2000) FEBS Lett. 486:79-87) and its sequence has recently been included in patent publication WO0185946 A2.
Experimental Observations
The function of G2982 was analyzed through overexpression of a genomic clone in Arabidopsis. 35S::G2982 transformants displayed increased tolerance to dehydration stress. In all other respects, these transgenic lines appeared wild type.
In a soil based drought assay, G2982 overexpressing Arabidopsis plants were significantly greener and larger than wild-type control plants.
Utilities
The response of 35S::G2982 plants to dehydration stress indicated that G2982 or its equivalogs could be used to improve plant tolerance to cold, freezing, drought, and salt conditions.
G2983 (SEQ ID NO: 613)
Published Information
G2983 was initially identified within a sequence released by the Arabidopsis genome initiative (gene F2G19.11 within BAC clone F2G19, Chromosome 1, GenBank accession, AC083835), as a gene encoding a novel WUSCHEL-like homeodomain protein. No data are available regarding the function of this locus.
Experimental Observations
The boundaries of G2983 were initially determined by RACE experiments, and transgenic lines were generated in which the gene was overexpressed from a 35 S promoter. These plants displayed some striking alterations in morphology compared to wild type. 35S::G2983 lines exhibited a spectrum of developmental changes including alterations in leaf shape, phyllotaxy, coloration, growth rate, floral organ abnormalities, and a reduction in overall size. However, the most prominent phenotype was seen in the inflorescence, where strange growths developed from stems, pedicels and floral organs. In some cases, such outgrowths showed stigmatic tissue or took on a trichome-like identity.
Similar results from overexpression of a related gene, WUSCHEL had previously been obtained, in which the latter gene was found to induce the formation of callus like outgrowths. WUSCHEL has a key role in the maintenance of stem cell identity within apical meristems, and during the reproductive phase, participates in a feedback loop with the AGAMOUS gene, which induces floral meristems to terminally differentiate into carpels (Mayer et al. (1998) Cell 95: 805-815; Schoof et al (2000) Cell 100: 635-644; Lohmann et al. (2001) Cell 105: 793-803). The similarity between the WUS and G2983 overexpression phenotypes indicated that the genes might have similar roles in regulating apical meristem activity. Two other WUS-like genes, G1539 and G1591, have also yielded similar effects on the inflorescence to G2983.
An additional, potentially related phenotype was observed in the roots of 35S::G2983 lines in physiology experiments. During assays which involved the monitoring of root growth on vertical plates, following inversion of plates, it was noted that 35S::G2983 roots displayed an abnormal gravitropic response; rather than growing downwards, the roots grew in a spiral pattern, and appeared to proliferate and generate an increased number of root hairs.
Utilities
The overexpression phenotypes of G2983 indicated that this transcription factor or its orthologs might be used to regulate meristem activity and stem cell identity. As such, the gene could have applications in the plant cell culture lines, or in transformation or micro-propagation systems, where generation of callus is currently problematic but is required as part of the procedure. Additionally, the effects on root morphology seen in 35S::G2983 plants, indicated that the gene might be used to manipulate root hair development and thereby enhance the ability of crops to survive abiotic stresses such as drought. Finally, the alterations in trichome development seen in occasional lines indicated that the gene could be used to manipulate the formation of those structures.
Given its potential capacity to trigger ectopic carpel development in Arabidopsis, G2983 or its orthologs can be applied to commercial species to induce formation of increased numbers of carpels or fruits. A particular application might exist in saffron, one of the world's most expensive spices. Saffron filaments, or threads, are actually the dried stigmas of the saffron flower, Crocus Sativus Linneaus. Each flower contains only three stigmas, and more than 75,000 of these flowers are needed to produce just one pound of saffron filaments. A gene such as G2983, which increased carpel numbers, could therefore substantially increase yield.
G2990 (SEQ ID NO: 615)
Published Information
G2990 corresponds to gene MKM21.8 within P1 clone MKM21 (GenBank accession AB016876) derived from chromosome 5. We identified this locus as a novel member of the ZF-HB family and no data regarding its function are currently in the public domain (as of Aug. 5, 2002).
Experimental Observations
The boundaries of G2990 were identified by RACE experiments performed and a full-length clone was then PCR-amplified from cDNA derived from mixed tissue samples. Full-length cDNA sequences for this gene have recently been deposited in GenBank (Accessions AY091034 and AY117347), and the coding sequences are identical to that identified by us.
The function of G2990 was assessed by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the cDNA was constitutively expressed from a 35S CaMV promoter. Under normal growth circumstances, 35S::G2990 transformants displayed wild-type morphology. However, two of three independent T2 populations showed an altered response to nitrogen deprivation in plate-based assays, indicating that the gene might be involved in the response to conditions of nutrient limitation.
Utilities
The data from physiological assays, revealing that G2990 can influence the response to nitrogen deprivation, indicate that the gene might have utility in engineering commercial species that can be successfully cultivated in low nitrogen soils or growth media.
G2992 (SEQ ID NO: 617)
Published Information
G2992 corresponds to gene F24J1.29 within BAC clone F24J1 (GenBank accession AC021046) derived from chromosome 1. No data regarding its function are currently in the public domain.
Experimental Observations
This locus was identified as a member of the ZF-HB family. The boundaries of G2992 were determined by RACE, and a clone was PCR-amplified from cDNA derived from mixed tissue samples. The function of G2992 was then assessed by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the cDNA was constitutively expressed from a 35S CaMV promoter. 35S::G2992 T2 populations displayed an enhanced ability to germinate on plates containing high levels of sodium chloride, and on plates containing high levels of ABA. Thus, G2992 can function as part of response pathway to abiotic stress. 35S::G2992 seedlings were also noted to be rather pale in coloration, and appeared more sensitive than wild type to conditions of nitrogen deprivation. Furthermore, 35S::G2992 seedlings also showed altered root morphology; fewer lateral roots were present. Additionally, morphological studies revealed that overexpression of G2992 can accelerate the onset of reproductive development, reduce plant size, and produce changes in leaf shape.
Utilities
Based on the phenotypes observed in morphological and physiological assays, G2992 might be have a number of applications.
Given the salt resistance and ABA insensitivity exhibited by 35S::G2992 transformants, the gene might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in salinified soils, or under drought conditions.
G2992 appears to affect ABA sensitivity; therefore the gene may have a utility in modifying ABA responses such as seed development and dormancy, as well as cold and dehydration tolerance.
The data from physiological assays, revealing that G2992 can influence the response to nitrogen deprivation, indicate that the gene might have utility in engineering commercial species that can be successfully cultivated in low nitrogen soils or growth media.
The early flowering exhibited by 35S::G2992 lines, indicates that the gene might be used to manipulate flowering time in commercial species. In particular, G2992 could be applied to accelerate flowering or eliminate any requirements for vernalization.
Finally, the effects of G2992 overexpression on leaf shape indicate that the gene might be used to modify plant architecture.
G2996 (SEQ ID NO: 621)
Published Information
No data regarding the function of this gene are presently known or available. Experimental Observations.
This locus was identified as a novel member of the ZF-HB family. The boundaries of G2996 were identified from partial EST sequences in the public databases and were confirmed by RACE experiments. A full-length clone was then PCR-amplified from cDNA derived from mixed tissue samples. The function of G2996 was assessed by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the cDNA was constitutively expressed from a 35S CaMV promoter. Under normal growth conditions, 35S::G2996 transformants displayed wild-type morphology. However, each of three independent T2 populations showed increased sensitivity to mannitol in plate-based root growth inhibition assays, indicating that G2996 can influence osmotic stress responses.
Utilities
The data from physiological assays, revealing that G2996 can influence osmotic stress responses, indicate that the gene might have utility in engineering commercial species that have increased survivability and yield under adverse osmotic conditions.
G2998 (SEQ ID NO: 623)
Published Information
The gene is a member of the ZF-HB family. No data have been presented publicly regarding the function of this gene.
Experimental Observations
The boundaries of G2998 were determined by RACE, and a clone was PCR-amplified from cDNA derived from mixed tissue samples. A full-length cDNA sequence has recently been deposited in GenBank (Accession AY084462), and its coding sequence is identical that identified by us. The function of G2998 was assessed by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the cDNA was constitutively expressed from a 35S CaMV promoter. All three of the 35S::G2998 T2 populations analyzed, displayed an enhanced ability to germinate on plates containing high levels of sodium chloride. Thus, G2998 can function as part of response pathway to abiotic stress. Additionally, morphological studies revealed that overexpression of G2998 can produce a delay in the onset of reproductive development, indicating that the gene can have a role in determining flowering time in Arabidopsis. 
Utilities
Based on the increased salt tolerance exhibited by the 35S::G2998 lines in physiology assays, this gene might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in salinified soils, or under drought conditions.
The delayed flowering displayed by 35S::G2998 transformants indicates that the gene might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
Given the effects of G2998 overexpression, it is likely that the activity of the gene (or its orthologs) could be modified to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any requirement for vernalization.
G2999 (SEQ ID NO: 625)
Published Information
G2999 was identified within a sequence released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (Chromosome 2, GenBank accession AC006439).
Experimental Observations
The boundaries of G2999 were determined by RACE experiments and a full-length clone was PCR-amplified out of cDNA derived from mixed tissues. The function of G2999 was then assessed by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which the cDNA was constitutively expressed from a 35S CaMV promoter. 35S::G2999 transformants displayed wild-type morphology, but two of three T2 lines showed increased tolerance to salt stress in the physiology assays. Root growth assays with G2999 overexpressing seedlings and controls in a high sodium chloride medium showed that a majority of 35S::G2999 Arabidopsis seedlings appeared larger, greener, and had more root growth than the control seedlings on the right (FIG. 8C, four control seedling are on the right). G2998, a paralogous Arabidopsis sequence, also showed a salt phenotype and performed similarly in the plate-based salt stress assay (FIG. 8B). Thus, G2998 and G2999 could act in the same pathways, and have a role in the response to abiotic stress.
Utilities
Given the salt resistance exhibited by 35S::G2999 transformants, the gene might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in saline soils, or under drought conditions.
G3070 (SEQ ID NO: 653)
Published Information
G3070 was identified in the sequence of BAC T23J18, GenBank accession number AC01661, released by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. There is no other published or public information about the function of G3070.
Exerimental Observations
The 5′ end of G3070 was determined by RACE PCR. The function of G3070 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. 35S::G3070 transformants had leaves with distinctive steely gray coloration at all stages of the life cycle. In all other respects, however, the plants appeared morphologically normal. This dramatic change in leaf color might have arisen from a variety of possible causes, including a change in the level of pigments, alterations in wax accumulation/composition at the leaf surface, or by a change in the histology of the leaves. Alterations in cell shape or changes in the adhesion of epidermis to underlying cell layers have been found to result in coloration changes (Cornish and Zeevart (1986) Plant Physiol 81: 1017-1021; Glover et al. (1998) Development 125: 3497-3508; Heys et al. (1997) Planta 202: 85-92). There was no consistent difference in physiological assays between 35S::G3070 transformants and wild-type seedlings.
Utilities
Depending on the basis of the color change seen in 35S::G3070 lines, a number of applications could be envisaged.
If the phenotype is due to loosening of epidermal cell layers, the gene or its equivalogs might be used to produce fruits, vegetables, and other plant products, which can be more easily peeled.
If the effects are due to changes in wax composition and/or accumulation, G3070 or its equivalogs might be used to afford protection against pests or abiotic stresses such as drought.
If the phenotype is due to changes in pigment levels within the leaf, the gene or its equivalogs may be applied to alter photosynthetic capacity and yield.
G3076 (SEQ ID NO: 655)
Published Information
G3076 (At4g18650) was identified as part of the BAC clone F28A21 (GenBank accession AL035526).
Experimental Observations
The function of G3076 was studied using plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G3076 produced no consistent alterations in Arabidopsis growth and development. However, G3076 overexpressing lines showed more tolerance to a severe drought stress treatment.
Utilities
The reduced sensitivity of 35S::G3076 lines in the dehydration assay indicated that the gene or its equivalogs might be used to engineer crops with increased water use efficiency or increased tolerance to stresses such as drought, salt, freezing and/or chilling stress.
G3083 (SEQ ID NO: 657)
Published Information
G3083 (At3g14880) is part of BAC clone K15M2, GenBank accession number AP000370 (nid=5541653).
Experimental Observations
The 5′- and 3′-ends of G3083 were determined by RACE and the function of the gene was assessed by analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which a genomic clone was constitutively expressed from a 35S promoter. In the physiological analysis, two out of the three 35S::G3083 lines tested, displayed an enhanced ability to germinate on plates containing high levels of sodium chloride. Thus, G3083 can function as part of a response pathway to abiotic stress. 35S::G3083 plants were indistinguishable from wild-type controls in the morphological analysis.
Utilities
Based on the increased salt tolerance exhibited by the 35S::G3083 lines in physiology assays, this gene might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in salinified soils, or under drought conditions.
G3086 (SEQ ID NO: 661)
Published Information
G3086 corresponds to gene AT1G51140, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. No information is available about the function(s) of G3086.
Experimental Observations
The function of G3086 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Overexpression of G3086 in Arabidopsis produced a pronounced acceleration in the onset of flowering. 35S::G3086 transformants produced visible flower buds 5-7 days early (in inductive 24-hour light conditions), and were markedly smaller than wild-type controls.
G3086 overexpressing lines were larger and more tolerant of heat stress. FIG. 9A shows the effects of a heat assay on Arabidopsis wild-type and G3086-overexpressing plants. The overexpressors on the left were generally larger, paler, and exhibited earlier bolting than the wild type plants seen on the right of this plate.
35S::G3086 transformants were also larger and displayed more root growth when grown under high salt conditions. G3086 overexpressors, as exemplified by the eight seedlings on the right of FIG. 9B, were larger, greener, and had more root growth than control plants, as exemplified by the four seedlings on the right in FIG. 9B.
Utilities
Based on the phenotypes observed in morphological and physiological assays, G3086 might be have a number of utilities.
Given the salt resistance exhibited by 35S::G3086 transformants, the gene or its orthologs might be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in saline soils, or under drought conditions.
Based on the response of 35S::G3086 lines to heat stress, the gene or its orthologs might be used to engineer crop plants with increased tolerance to abiotic stresses such as high temperatures, a stress that often occurs simultaneously with other environmental stress conditions such as drought or salt stress.
The early flowering displayed by 35S::G3086 transformants indicated that the gene or its orthologs might be used to accelerate the flowering of commercial species, or to eliminate any requirements for vernalization.
Example IX
Identification of Homologous Sequences
This example describes identification of genes that are orthologous to Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factors from a computer homology search.
Homologous sequences, including those of paralogs and orthologs from Arabidopsis and other plant species, were identified using database sequence search tools, such as the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410; and Altschul et al. (1997) Nucleic Acid Res. 25: 3389-3402). The tblastx sequence analysis programs were employed using the BLOSUM-62 scoring matrix (Henikoff and Henikoff (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 10915-10919). The entire NCBI GenBank database was filtered for sequences from all plants except Arabidopsis thaliana by selecting all entries in the NCBI GenBank database associated with NCBI taxonomic ID 33090 (Viridiplantae; all plants) and excluding entries associated with taxonomic ID 3701 (Arabidopsis thaliana).
These sequences are compared to sequences representing genes of the Sequence Listing, for example, SEQ ID NO: 2N−1, wherein N=1-335, using the Washington University TBLASTX algorithm (version 2.0a19MP) at the default settings using gapped alignments with the filter “off”. For each of these gene sequences, individual comparisons were ordered by probability score (P-value), where the score reflects the probability that a particular alignment occurred by chance. For example, a score of 3.6e−40 is 3.6×10−40. In addition to P-values, comparisons were also scored by percentage identity. Percentage identity reflects the degree to which two segments of DNA or protein are identical over a particular length. Examples of sequences so identified are presented in Tables 7, 8 and 9Paralogous or orthologous sequences were readily identified from proprietary databases and in GenBank. The percent sequence identity among these sequences can be as low as 47%, or even lower sequence identity.
Candidate paralogous sequences were identified among Arabidopsis transcription factors through alignment, identity, and phylogenic relationships. A list of paralogs is shown in Table 8. Candidate orthologous sequences were identified from proprietary unigene sets of plant gene sequences in Zea mays, Glycine max and Oryza sativa based on significant homology to Arabidopsis transcription factors. These candidates were reciprocally compared to the set of Arabidopsis transcription factors. If the candidate showed maximal similarity in the protein domain to the eliciting transcription factor or to a paralog of the eliciting transcription factor, then it was considered to be an ortholog. Identified non-Arabidopsis sequences that were shown in this manner to be orthologous to the Arabidopsis sequences are provided in Tables 7 and 9.
Example X
Screen of Plant cDNA Library for Sequence Encoding a Transcription Factor DNA Binding Domain that Binds to a Transcription Factor Binding Promoter Element and Demonstration of Protein Transcription Regulation Activity
The “one-hybrid” strategy (Li and Herskowitz (1993) Science 262: 1870-1874) is used to screen for plant cDNA clones encoding a polypeptide comprising a transcription factor DNA binding domain, a conserved domain. In brief, yeast strains are constructed that contain a lacZ reporter gene with either wild-type or mutant transcription factor binding promoter element sequences in place of the normal UAS (upstream activator sequence) of the GALL promoter. Yeast reporter strains are constructed that carry transcription factor binding promoter element sequences as UAS elements are operably linked upstream (5′) of a lacZ reporter gene with a minimal GAL1 promoter. The strains are transformed with a plant expression library that contains random cDNA inserts fused to the GAL4 activation domain (GAL4-ACT) and screened for blue colony formation on X-gal-treated filters (X-gal: 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactoside; Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad Calif.). Alternatively, the strains are transformed with a cDNA polynucleotide encoding a known transcription factor DNA binding domain polypeptide sequence.
Yeast strains carrying these reporter constructs produce low levels of beta-galactosidase and form white colonies on filters containing X-gal. The reporter strains carrying wild-type transcription factor binding promoter element sequences are transformed with a polynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide comprising a plant transcription factor DNA binding domain operably linked to the acidic activator domain of the yeast GAL4 transcription factor, “GAL4-ACT”. The clones that contain a polynucleotide encoding a transcription factor DNA binding domain operably linked to GLA4-ACT can bind upstream of the lacZ reporter genes carrying the wild-type transcription factor binding promoter element sequence, activate transcription of the lacZ gene and result in yeast forming blue colonies on X-gal-treated filters.
Upon screening about 2×106 yeast transformants, positive cDNA clones are isolated; i.e., clones that cause yeast strains carrying lacZ reporters operably linked to wild-type transcription factor binding promoter elements to form blue colonies on X-gal-treated filters. The cDNA clones do not cause a yeast strain carrying a mutant type transcription factor binding promoter elements fused to LacZ to turn blue. Thus, a polynucleotide encoding transcription factor DNA binding domain, a conserved domain, is shown to activate transcription of a gene.
Example XI
Gel Shift Assays
The presence of a transcription factor comprising a DNA binding domain which binds to a DNA transcription factor binding element is evaluated using the following gel shift assay. The transcription factor is recombinantly expressed and isolated from E. coli or isolated from plant material. Total soluble protein, including transcription factor, (40 ng) is incubated at room temperature in 10 μl of 1× binding buffer (15 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 1 mM EDTA, 30 mM KCl, 5% glycerol, 5% bovine serum albumin, 1 mM DTT) plus 50 ng poly(dl-dC):poly(dl-dC) (Pharmacia, Piscataway N.J.) with or without 100 ng competitor DNA. After 10 minutes incubation, probe DNA comprising a DNA transcription factor binding element (1 ng) that has been 32P-labeled by end-filling (Sambrook et al. (1989) supra) is added and the mixture incubated for an additional 10 minutes. Samples are loaded onto polyacrylamide gels (4% w/v) and fractionated by electrophoresis at 150V for 2 h (Sambrook et al. supra). The degree of transcription factor-probe DNA binding is visualized using autoradiography. Probes and competitor DNAs are prepared from oligonucleotide inserts ligated into the BamHI site of pUC 118 (Vieira et al. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 153: 3-11). Orientation and concatenation number of the inserts are determined by dideoxy DNA sequence analysis (Sambrook et al. supra). Inserts are recovered after restriction digestion with EcoRI and HindIII and fractionation on polyacrylamide gels (12% w/v) (Sambrook et al. supra).
Example XII
Introduction of Polynucleotides into Dicotyledonous Plants
Any of the transcription factor sequences of the invention listed in the Sequence Listing, and paralogous, and orthologous sequences, may be recombined into pMEN20 or pMEN65 expression vectors and then are transformed into a plant for the purpose of modifying plant traits. The cloning vector may be introduced into a variety of cereal plants by means well known in the art such as, for example, direct DNA transfer or Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. It is now routine to produce transgenic plants using most dicot plants (see Weissbach and Weissbach, (1989) supra; Gelvin et al. (1990) supra; Herrera-Estrella et al. (1983) supra; Bevan (1984) supra; and Klee (1985) supra). Methods for analysis of traits are routine in the art and examples are disclosed above.
Example XIII
Transformation of Cereal Plants with an Expression Vector
Cereal plants such as, but not limited to, corn, wheat, rice, sorghum, or barley, may also be transformed with the present polynucleotide sequences in pMEN20 or pMEN65 expression vectors for the purpose of modifying plant traits. For example, pMEN020 may be modified to replace the NptII coding region with the BAR gene of Streptomyces hygroscopicus that confers resistance to phosphinothricin. The KpnI and BglII sites of the Bar gene are removed by site-directed mutagenesis with silent codon changes.
The cloning vector may be introduced into a variety of cereal plants by means well known in the art such as, for example, direct DNA transfer or Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. It is now routine to produce transgenic plants of most cereal crops (Vasil (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 925-937) such as corn, wheat, rice, sorghum (Cassas et al. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90: 11212-11216, and barley (Wan and Lemeaux (1994) Plant Physiol. 104:37-48. DNA transfer methods such as the microprojectile can be used for corn (Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 833-839); Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618; Ishida (1990) Nature Biotechnol. 14:745-750), wheat (Vasil et al. (1992) Bio/Technol. 10:667-674; Vasil et al. (1993) Bio/Technol. 11:1553-1558; Weeks et al. (1993) Plant Physiol. 102:1077-1084), rice (Christou (1991) Bio/Technol. 9:957-962; Hiei et al. (1994) Plant J. 6:271-282; Aldemita and Hodges (1996) Planta 199:612-617; and Hiei et al. (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 35:205-218). For most cereal plants, embryogenic cells derived from immature scutellum tissues are the preferred cellular targets for transformation (Hiei et al. (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 35:205-218; Vasil (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 925-937).
Vectors according to the present invention may be transformed into corn embryogenic cells derived from immature scutellar tissue by using microprojectile bombardment, with the A188XB73 genotype as the preferred genotype (Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 833-839; Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618). After microprojectile bombardment the tissues are selected on phosphinothricin to identify the transgenic embryogenic cells (Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618). Transgenic plants are regenerated by standard corn regeneration techniques (Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 833-839; Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618).
The plasmids prepared as described above can also be used to produce transgenic wheat and rice plants (Christou (1991) Bio/Technol. 9:957-962; Hiei et al. (1994) Plant J. 6:271-282; Aldemita and Hodges (1996) Planta 199:612-617; and Hiei et al. (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 35:205-218) that coordinately express genes of interest by following standard transformation protocols known to those skilled in the art for rice and wheat (Vasil et al. (1992) Bio/Technol. 10:667-674; Vasil et al. (1993) Bio/Technol. 11:1553-1558; and Weeks et al. (1993) Plant Physiol. 102:1077-1084), where the bar gene is used as the selectable marker.
Example XIV
Identification of Orthologous and Paralogous Sequences
Orthologs to Arabidopsis genes may identified by several methods, including hybridization, amplification, or bioinformatically. This example describes how one may identify homologs to the Arabidopsis AP2 family transcription factor CBF1 (polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 2238, encoded polypeptide SEQ ID NO: 2239), which confers tolerance to abiotic stresses (Thomashow et al. (2002) U.S. Pat. No. 6,417,428), and an example to confirm the function of homologous sequences. In this example, orthologs to CBF1 were found in canola (Brassica napus) using polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Degenerate primers were designed for regions of AP2 binding domain and outside of the AP2 (carboxyl terminal domain):







Mol 368 (reverse)







(SEQ ID NO: 2246)







5′- CAY CCN ATH TAY MGN GGN GT -3′


 


Mol 378 (forward)







(SEQ ID NO: 2247)







5′- GGN ARN ARC ATN CCY TCN GCC -3′


(Y: C/T, N: A/C/G/T, H: A/C/T, M: A/C, R: A/G)






Primer Mol 368 is in the AP2 binding domain of CBF1 (amino acid sequence: His-Pro-Ile-Tyr-Arg-Gly-Val) while primer Mol 378 is outside the AP2 domain (carboxyl terminal domain) (amino acid sequence: Met-Ala-Glu-Gly-Met-Leu-Leu-Pro).
The genomic DNA isolated from B. napus was PCR-amplified by using these primers following these conditions: an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 93° C.; 35 cycles of 93° C. for 1 min, 55° C. for 1 min, and 72° C. for 1 min; and a final incubation of 7 min at 72° C. at the end of cycling.
The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.2% agarose gel and transferred to nylon membrane and hybridized with the AT CBF1 probe prepared from Arabidopsis genomic DNA by PCR amplification. The hybridized products were visualized by colorimetric detection system (Boehringer Mannheim) and the corresponding bands from a similar agarose gel were isolated using the Qiagen Extraction Kit (Qiagen). The DNA fragments were ligated into the TA clone vector from TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen) and transformed into E. coli strain TOP10 (Invitrogen).
Seven colonies were picked and the inserts were sequenced on an ABI 377 machine from both strands of sense and antisense after plasmid DNA isolation. The DNA sequence was edited by sequencer and aligned with the AtCBF1 by GCG software and NCBI blast searching.
The nucleic acid sequence and amino acid sequence of one canola ortholog found in this manner (bnCBF1; polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 2244 and polypeptide SEQ ID NO: 2245) identified by this process is shown in the Sequence Listing.
The aligned amino acid sequences show that the bnCBF1 gene has 88% identity with the Arabidopsis sequence in the AP2 domain region and 85% identity with the Arabidopsis sequence outside the AP2 domain when aligned for two insertion sequences that are outside the AP2 domain.
Similarly, paralogous sequences to Arabidopsis genes, such as CBF1, may also be identified.
Two paralogs of CBF1 from Arabidopsis thaliana: CBF2 and CBF3. CBF2 and CBF3 have been cloned and sequenced as described below. The sequences of the DNA SEQ ID NO: 2240 and 2242 and encoded proteins SEQ ID NO: 2241 and 2243 are set forth in the Sequence Listing.
A lambda cDNA library prepared from RNA isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia (Lin and Thomashow (1992) Plant Physiol. 99: 519-525) was screened for recombinant clones that carried inserts related to the CBF1 gene (Stockinger et al. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94:1035-1040). CBF1 was 32P-radiolabeled by random priming (Sambrook et al. supra) and used to screen the library by the plaque-lift technique using standard stringent hybridization and wash conditions (Hajela et al. (1990) Plant Physiol. 93:1246-1252; Sambrook et al. supra) 6×SSPE buffer, 60° C. for hybridization and 0.1×SSPE buffer and 60° C. for washes). Twelve positively hybridizing clones were obtained and the DNA sequences of the cDNA inserts were determined. The results indicated that the clones fell into three classes. One class carried inserts corresponding to CBF1. The two other classes carried sequences corresponding to two different homologs of CBF1, designated CBF2 and CBF3. The nucleic acid sequences and predicted protein coding sequences for Arabidopsis CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3 are listed in the Sequence Listing (SEQ ID NOs:2238, 2240, 2242 and SEQ ID NOs: 2239, 2241, and 2243, respectively). The nucleic acid sequences and predicted protein coding sequence for Brassica napus CBF ortholog is listed in the Sequence Listing (SEQ ID NOs: 2244 and 2245, respectively).
A comparison of the nucleic acid sequences of Arabidopsis CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3 indicate that they are 83 to 85% identical as shown in Table 11.










TABLE 11









Percent identitya











DNAb
Polypeptide















cbf1/cbf2
85
86



cbf1/cbf3
83
84



cbf2/cbf3
84
85







aPercent identity was determined using the Clustal algorithm from the Megalign program (DNASTAR, Inc.).



bComparisons of the nucleic acid sequences of the open reading frames are shown.






Similarly, the amino acid sequences of the three CBF polypeptides range from 84 to 86% identity. An alignment of the three amino acidic sequences reveals that most of the differences in amino acid sequence occur in the acidic C-terminal half of the polypeptide. This region of CBF1 serves as an activation domain in both yeast and Arabidopsis (not shown).
Residues 47 to 106 of CBF1 correspond to the AP2 domain of the protein, a DNA binding motif that to date, has only been found in plant proteins. A comparison of the AP2 domains of CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3 indicates that there are a few differences in amino acid sequence. These differences in amino acid sequence might have an effect on DNA binding specificity.
Example XV
Transformation of Canola with a Plasmid Containing CBF1, CBF2, or CBF3
After identifying homologous genes to CBF1, canola was transformed with a plasmid containing the Arabidopsis CBF1, CBF2, or CBF3 genes cloned into the vector pGA643 (An (1987) Methods Enzymol. 253: 292). In these constructs the CBF genes were expressed constitutively under the CaMV 35S promoter. In addition, the CBF1 gene was cloned under the control of the Arabidopsis COR15 promoter in the same vector pGA643. Each construct was transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101. Transformed Agrobacteria were grown for 2 days in minimal AB medium containing appropriate antibiotics.
Spring canola (B. napus cv. Westar) was transformed using the protocol of Moloney et al. ((1989) Plant Cell Reports 8: 238) with some modifications as described. Briefly, seeds were sterilized and plated on half strength MS medium, containing 1% sucrose. Plates were incubated at 24° C. under 60-80 μE/m2s light using al 6 hour light/8 hour dark photoperiod. Cotyledons from 4-5 day old seedlings were collected, the petioles cut and dipped into the Agrobacterium solution. The dipped cotyledons were placed on co-cultivation medium at a density of 20 cotyledons/plate and incubated as described above for 3 days. Explants were transferred to the same media, but containing 300 mg/l timentin (SmithKline Beecham, Pa.) and thinned to 10 cotyledons/plate. After 7 days explants were transferred to Selection/Regeneration medium. Transfers were continued every 2-3 weeks (2 or 3 times) until shoots had developed. Shoots were transferred to Shoot-Elongation medium every 2-3 weeks. Healthy looking shoots were transferred to rooting medium. Once good roots had developed, the plants were placed into moist potting soil.
The transformed plants were then analyzed for the presence of the NPTII gene/kanamycin resistance by ELISA, using the ELISA NPTII kit from 5Prime-3Prime Inc. (Boulder, Colo.). Approximately 70% of the screened plants were NPTII positive. Only those plants were further analyzed.
From Northern blot analysis of the plants that were transformed with the constitutively expressing constructs, showed expression of the CBF genes and all CBF genes were capable of inducing the Brassica napus cold-regulated gene BN115 (homolog of the Arabidopsis COR15 gene). Most of the transgenic plants appear to exhibit a normal growth phenotype. As expected, the transgenic plants are more freezing tolerant than the wild-type plants. Using the electrolyte leakage of leaves test, the control showed a 50% leakage at −2 to −3° C. Spring canola transformed with either CBF1 or CBF2 showed a 50% leakage at −6 to −7° C. Spring canola transformed with CBF3 shows a 50% leakage at about −10 to −15° C. Winter canola transformed with CBF3 may show a 50% leakage at about −16 to −2° C. Furthermore, if the spring or winter canola are cold acclimated the transformed plants may exhibit a further increase in freezing tolerance of at least −2° C.
To test salinity tolerance of the transformed plants, plants were watered with 150 mM NaCl. Plants overexpressing CBF1, CBF2 or CBF3 grew better compared with plants that had not been transformed with CBF1, CBF2 or CBF3.
These results demonstrate that homologs of Arabidopsis transcription factors can be identified and shown to confer similar functions in non-Arabidopsis plant species.
Example XVI
Cloning of Transcription Factor Promoters
Promoters are isolated from transcription factor genes that have gene expression patterns useful for a range of applications, as determined by methods well known in the art (including transcript profile analysis with cDNA or oligonucleotide microarrays, Northern blot analysis, semi-quantitative or quantitative RT-PCR). Interesting gene expression profiles are revealed by determining transcript abundance for a selected transcription factor gene after exposure of plants to a range of different experimental conditions, and in a range of different tissue or organ types, or developmental stages. Experimental conditions to which plants are exposed for this purpose includes cold, heat, drought, osmotic challenge, varied hormone concentrations (ABA, GA, auxin, cytokinin, salicylic acid, brassinosteroid), pathogen and pest challenge. The tissue types and developmental stages include stem, root, flower, rosette leaves, cauline leaves, siliques, germinating seed, and meristematic tissue. The set of expression levels provides a pattern that is determined by the regulatory elements of the gene promoter.
Transcription factor promoters for the genes disclosed herein are obtained by cloning 1.5 kb to 2.0 kb of genomic sequence immediately upstream of the translation start codon for the coding sequence of the encoded transcription factor protein. This region includes the 5′-UTR of the transcription factor gene, which can comprise regulatory elements. The 1.5 kb to 2.0 kb region is cloned through PCR methods, using primers that include one in the 3′ direction located at the translation start codon (including appropriate adaptor sequence), and one in the 5′ direction located from 1.5 kb to 2.0 kb upstream of the translation start codon (including appropriate adaptor sequence). The desired fragments are PCR-amplified from Arabidopsis Col-0 genomic DNA using high-fidelity Taq DNA polymerase to minimize the incorporation of point mutation(s). The cloning primers incorporate two rare restriction sites, such as Not1 and Sfi1, found at low frequency throughout the Arabidopsis genome. Additional restriction sites are used in the instances where a Not1 or Sfi1 restriction site is present within the promoter.
The 1.5-2.0 kb fragment upstream from the translation start codon, including the 5′-untranslated region of the transcription factor, is cloned in a binary transformation vector immediately upstream of a suitable reporter gene, or a transactivator gene that is capable of programming expression of a reporter gene in a second gene construct. Reporter genes used include green fluorescent protein (and related fluorescent protein color variants), beta-glucuronidase, and luciferase. Suitable transactivator genes include LexA-GAL4, along with a transactivatable reporter in a second binary plasmid (as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/958,131, incorporated herein by reference). The binary plasmid(s) is transferred into Agrobacterium and the structure of the plasmid confirmed by PCR. These strains are introduced into Arabidopsis plants as described in other examples, and gene expression patterns determined according to standard methods know to one skilled in the art for monitoring GFP fluorescence, beta-glucuronidase activity, or luminescence.
The promoter region for G1753 is obtained from Arabidopsis chromosome 2 clone F1011 (AC006919), gene At2g36450, from position 43906-45410 of the genomic clone. The complement of this sequence is the promoter oriented in the 5′-3′ direction, with the translation start codon for G1753 the complement of positions 43903-43905.
The present invention is not limited by the specific embodiments described herein. The invention now being fully described, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many changes and modifications can be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the appended claims. Modifications that become apparent from the foregoing description and accompanying figures fall within the scope of the claims.
All references, publications, patent documents, web pages, and other documents cited or mentioned herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes. Although the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments and examples, it should be understood that one of ordinary skill can make various modifications without departing from the spirit of the invention. The scope of the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments and examples provided. 







LENGTHY TABLES




The patent contains a lengthy table section. A copy of the table is available in electronic form from the USPTO web site (http://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageRequest=docDetail&DocID=US07825296B2). An electronic copy of the table will also be available from the USPTO upon request and payment of the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.19(b)(3).

## Claims

1. A recombinant polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid molecule operably linked to a heterologous promoter wherein the nucleic acid molecule encodes a polypeptide having a conserved domain that is at least 95% identical to amino acids 12-80 of SEQ ID NO: 272; and wherein overexpression of the polypeptide in a plant results in greater tolerance to sucrose, dehydration, osmotic stress, cold, or freezing as compared to a control plant that does not comprise the recombinant polynucleotide.

2. The recombinant polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the recombinant polynucleotide encodes SEQ ID NO: 272.

3. A transgenic plant that comprises a recombinant polynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide;
wherein
the polypeptide has an amino acid sequence that is at least 95% identical to amino acids 12-80 of SEQ ID NO: 272; and wherein the overexpression of the polypeptide in the transgenic plant results in greater tolerance to sucrose, greater tolerance to dehydration, or greater tolerance to osmotic stress as compared to a control plant that does not comprise the recombinant polynucleotide.

4. A transgenic plant that comprises a recombinant polynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide, wherein the polypeptide comprises SEQ ID NO: 272.

5. The transgenic plant of claim 3, wherein expression of the polypeptide is regulated by a constitutive, inducible, or tissue-specific promoter.

6. The transgenic plant of claim 3, wherein the transgenic plant is a monocot.

7. The transgenic plant of claim 3, wherein the transgenic plant is a dicot.

8. A method for increasing the cold or freezing tolerance of a plant as compared to a control plant, the method comprising:
introducing into a target plant a recombinant polynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide;
wherein
the polypeptide has an amino acid sequence that is at least 95% identical to amino acids 12-80 of SEQ ID NO: 272; and wherein the transformed plant has greater tolerance to cold or freezing compared to a control plant.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the polypeptide comprises SEQ ID NO: 272.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein expression of the polypeptide is regulated by a constitutive, inducible, or tissue-specific promoter.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein the transgenic plant is a monocot.

12. The method of claim 8, wherein the transgenic plant is a dicot.

13. A transgenic plant that comprises a recombinant polynucleotide comprising a nucleic acid molecule operably linked to a heterologous promoter wherein the nucleic acid molecule encodes a polypeptide, wherein the polypeptide has an amino acid sequence that is at least 85% identical to SEQ ID NO:272; and wherein the overexpression of the polypeptide in the transgenic plant results in greater tolerance to sucrose, greater tolerance to dehydration, or greater tolerance to osmotic stress compared to a control plant.

14. The transgenic plant of claim 13, wherein the polypeptide has an amino acid sequence that is at least 95% identical to SEQ ID NO: 272.

15. The transgenic plant of claim 13, wherein the polypeptide is SEQ ID NO: 272.