Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 121 / Thursday, June 25, 2009 / Notices 30285 

Compressor Station in Morris County, 

New Jersey (Hanover Station), and 

uprate to 6,500 HP the existing Solar 

compressor unit at the Hanover Station 

such that the certificated HP at the 

station is reduced from 9,200 HP to 

6,500, and (2) abandon in place one 

2,000 HP compressor unit and related 

appurtenances located at the Eagle 

Compressor Station (Station No. 25) in 

Chester County, Pennsylvania (Eagle 

Station), all as more fully set forth in the 

application which is on file with the 

Commission and open to public 

inspection. This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 

‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for 

review in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room in Washington, DC. 

There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the 

Web site that enables subscribers to 

receive e-mail notification when a 

document is added to a subscribed 

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC 

Online service, please e-mail 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call 

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call 

(202) 502–8659. 

Texas Eastern states that the two 

Pratt-Whitney compressor units at the 

Hanover Station and the unit at the 

Eagle Station are outdated, and in 

conjunction with approval of the 

requested uprate of the Solar unit at the 

Hanover Station, are not needed for 

Texas Eastern to continue to meet its 

current firm service obligations. Texas 

Eastern further states that there will be 

no termination or reduction in service to 

any existing firm customer of Texas 

Eastern as a result of the proposed 

uprate and abandonments proposed in 

the application. According to Texas 

Eastern, the proposed abandonment will 

not affect Texas Eastern’s existing 

tariffs. Texas Eastern states that the 

proposed abandonments will reduce 

Texas Eastern’s current repair and 

maintenance expenses and eliminate the 

need for future capital expenditures at 

the stations associated with the 

abandoned units. As a result, Texas 

Eastern submits that the requested 

uprate and abandonment authorization 

is consistent with the public 

convenience and necessity. 

In order to accomplish the 

abandonment at the Eagle Station, Texas 

Eastern proposes to abandon in place 

the Westinghouse Type CS Frame 2–36– 

26 compressor and associated piping. 

No work is required in order to 

accomplish the proposed uprate of the 

Solar unit at the Hanover Station. In 

order to accomplish the abandonment of 

the Pratt-Whitney units at the Hanover 

Station, Texas Eastern proposes to (1) 

Remove the two units and the concrete 

foundation and piers; (2) remove all 

associated valves, gas piping, lube oil 

piping and control panels associated 

with the two units; and (3) complete 

rehabilitation. 

Any questions regarding this 

application should be directed to: Lisa 

A. Moore, General Manager, Rates and 

Certificates, Texas Eastern 

Transmission, LP, PO Box 1642, 

Houston, Texas 77251–1642, at (713) 

627–4102. 

There are two ways to become 

involved in the Commission’s review of 

this project. First, any person wishing to 

obtain legal status by becoming a party 

to the proceedings for this project 

should, on or before the comment date 

stated below, file with the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, 

a motion to intervene in accordance 

with the requirements of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) 

and the Regulations under the NGA (18 

CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party 

status will be placed on the service list 

maintained by the Secretary of the 

Commission and will receive copies of 

all documents filed by the applicant and 

by all other parties. A party must submit 

14 copies of filings made with the 

Commission and must mail a copy to 

the applicant and to every other party in 

the proceeding. Only parties to the 

proceeding can ask for court review of 

Commission orders in the proceeding. 

However, a person does not have to 

intervene in order to have comments 

considered. The second way to 

participate is by filing with the 

Secretary of the Commission, as soon as 

possible, an original and two copies of 

comments in support of or in opposition 

to this project. The Commission will 

consider these comments in 

determining the appropriate action to be 

taken, but the filing of a comment alone 

will not serve to make the filer a party 

to the proceeding. The Commission’s 

rules require that persons filing 

comments in opposition to the project 

provide copies of their protests only to 

the party or parties directly involved in 

the protest. 

Persons who wish to comment only 

on the environmental review of this 

project should submit an original and 

two copies of their comments to the 

Secretary of the Commission. 

Environmental commentors will be 

placed on the Commission’s 

environmental mailing list, will receive 

copies of the environmental documents, 

and will be notified of meetings 

associated with the Commission’s 

environmental review process. 

Environmental commentors will not be 

required to serve copies of filed 

documents on all other parties. 

However, the non-party commentors 

will not receive copies of all documents 

filed by other parties or issued by the 

Commission (except for the mailing of 

environmental documents issued by the 

Commission) and will not have the right 

to seek court review of the 

Commission’s final order. 

Comments, protests and interventions 

may be filed electronically via the 

Internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 

385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions 

on the Commission’s Web site under the 

‘‘e-Filing’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. 

The Commission strongly encourages 

intervenors to file electronically. 

Persons unable to file electronically 

should submit an original and 14 copies 

of the protest or intervention to the 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20426. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on July 9, 2009. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–14934 Filed 6–24–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. PF09–3–000; BLM Reference 

No. UTU–87295] 

Magnum Gas Storage, LLC; Notice of 

Intent To Prepare an Environmental 

Assessment for the Proposed Magnum 

Gas Storage Project and Draft Pony 

Express Resource Management Plan 

Amendment for the Bureau of Land 

Management, Request for Comments 

on Environmental Issues, and Notice 

of Public Scoping Meetings 

June 18, 2009. 

The staff of the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission (FERC or 

Commission) will prepare an 

environmental assessment (EA) and the 

staff of the Bureau of Land Management 

(BLM) will prepare a Draft Pony Express 

Resource Management Plan Amendment 

(Draft RMP Amendment). The EA and 

the Draft RMP Amendment will discuss 

the environmental impacts of the 

construction and operation of a new 

interstate natural gas storage facility and 

pipeline lateral, located in central Utah, 

proposed by Magnum Gas Storage, LLC 

(MGS) as part of its Magnum Gas 

Storage Project (Project). 

This notice announces the opening of 

the scoping process that will be used to 

gather input from the public and 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
30286 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 121 / Thursday, June 25, 2009 / Notices 

1 ‘‘We,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the 

environmental staff of the Office of Energy Projects 

(OEP). 

2The appendices referenced in this notice are not 

being printed in the Federal Register. Copies of all 

appendices are available on the Commission’s Web 

site at the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link or from the Commission’s 

Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE., 

Washington, DC 20426, or call (202) 502–8371. For 

interested agencies on the Project. Your 

input will help the Commission staff 

and cooperating agencies determine 

which issues need to be evaluated in the 

EA/Draft RMP Amendment. The staff 

will also use the scoping process to 

determine whether preparation of an 

environmental impact statement is 

required for this Project based on the 

anticipated level of impacts. Please note 

that the scoping period for this Project 

will close on July 27, 2009. 

Comments may be submitted in 

written form or verbally. Further details 

on how to submit written comments are 

provided in the Public Participation 

section of this notice. In lieu of or in 

addition to sending written comments, 

you are invited to attend public scoping 

meetings scheduled in the Project area 

where you can verbally comment on the 

proposed Project. These meetings are 

scheduled as follows: 

Date Location 

Tuesday, July 7, 2009 at 6 p.m. (MST) ................................................... Juab County School District, 346 E. 600 N. Street, Nephi, UT 84648. 

Wednesday, July 8, 2009 at 6 p.m. (MST) .............................................. Millard County School District, 285 E. 400 N., Delta, UT 84624. 

Interested groups and individuals are 

encouraged to attend the meetings and 

to present comments on the 

environmental issues they believe 

should be addressed in the EA/Draft 

RMP Amendment. A transcript of the 

meeting will be generated so that your 

comments will be accurately recorded. 

The FERC will be the lead federal 

agency for the preparation of the EA and 

the BLM will be the lead federal agency 

for the preparation of the Draft RMP 

Amendment. The EA will satisfy the 

requirements of the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and 

will be used by the FERC to consider the 

environmental impacts that could result 

if it issues MGS a Certificate of Public 

Convenience and Necessity under 

section 7 of the Natural Gas Act. 

The BLM is participating as a 

cooperating agency in the preparation of 

the EA to satisfy its respective NEPA 

and planning responsibilities since the 

Project would cross federal land under 

the jurisdiction of the Fillmore and Salt 

Lake Field Offices in Utah. Under 

section 185(f) of the Mineral Leasing Act 

of 1920, the BLM has the authority to 

issue right-of-way grants for all affected 

federal lands. This would be in 

accordance with Title 43 Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 2800 

and 2880, subsequent 2800 and 2880 

Manuals, and Handbook 2801–1. As a 

cooperating agency, the BLM would 

adopt the EA per Title 40 CFR 1506.3 

to meet its responsibilities under NEPA 

in considering MGS’s application for a 

Right-of-Way Grant and Temporary Use 

Permit for the portion of the Project on 

federal land. In addition, the U.S. Forest 

Service (FS) will participate as a 

cooperating agency because FS land 

may be impacted. The concurrence or 

non-concurrence of the FS would be 

considered in the BLM’s decision as 

well as impacts on resources and 

programs and the proposed Project’s 

conformance with land use plans as 

well as the proposed land use plan 

amendment for the Pony Express RMP. 

With this notice, the FERC staff is 

asking other federal, state, local, and 

tribal agencies with jurisdiction and/or 

special expertise with respect to 

environmental issues to cooperate with 

us in the preparation of the EA. In 

addition, the BLM is asking other 

federal, state, local, and tribal agencies 

to cooperate in the review of the plan 

amendment process. These agencies 

may choose to participate once they 

have evaluated MGS’s proposal relative 

to their responsibilities. Agencies that 

would like to request cooperating 

agency status should follow the 

instructions for filing comments 

described later in this NOI. 

This notice is being sent to affected 

landowners; federal, state, and local 

government representatives and 

agencies; environmental and public 

interest groups; Native American tribes; 

other interested parties in this 

proceeding; and local libraries and 

newspapers. We 1 encourage 

government representatives to notify 

their constituents of this planned 

Project and encourage them to comment 

on their areas of concern. 

If you are a landowner receiving this 

notice, you may be contacted by a 

pipeline company representative about 

the acquisition of an easement to 

construct, operate, and maintain the 

proposed facilities. The pipeline 

company would seek to negotiate a 

mutually acceptable agreement. 

However, if the Project is approved by 

the Commission, that approval conveys 

with it the right of eminent domain. 

Therefore, if easement negotiations fail 

to produce an agreement, the pipeline 

company could initiate condemnation 

proceedings in accordance with state 

law. 

A fact sheet prepared by the FERC 

entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas 

Facility on My Land? What Do I Need 

To Know?’’ is available for viewing on 

the FERC Internet Web site (http:// 

www.ferc.gov). This fact sheet addresses 

a number of typically asked questions, 

including the use of eminent domain 

and how to participate in the 

Commission’s proceedings. 

Summary of the Proposed Project 

The proposed development of the 

Project would include construction and 

operation of an underground natural gas 

storage field with a capacity of 64 

billion cubic feet (Bcf) on state and 

private land near the town of Delta in 

Millard County; Utah, and a 60-mile, 36- 

inch-diameter natural gas pipeline 

lateral linking the gas storage facility 

with existing interstate gas transmission 

pipelines at an interconnect site north of 

Goshen, Utah. The pipeline lateral 

could potentially cross private, state, FS 

and BLM public lands in Millard, Juab, 

and Utah Counties. 

The Project would consist of the 

following facilities: 

• Eight gas storage salt caverns each 

having a working gas capacity of 8 Bcf, 

5.6 Bcf working capacity, and supported 

by 2.4 Bcf base gas; 

• Approximately 60 miles of 36-inchdiameter natural gas pipeline; 

• Water supply wells and associated 

water supply pipelines; 

• Injection/withdrawal wells; 

• Leaching facilities for solution 

mining and creation of caverns; 

• Brine evaporation ponds required 

for brine management; 

• Surface facilities for gas storage that 

would include central compression and 

gas handling facilities, valving and 

dehydration facilities, pig launchers/ 

receivers and an operations center; 

• Electric transmission lines; 

• Meter and regulator stations, and 

• A 4-inch-diameter natural gas 

supply pipeline extending 

approximately 9.3 miles to the storage 

site for temporary power generation. 

The locations of the Project facilities 

are shown in Appendix 1.2


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 121 / Thursday, June 25, 2009 / Notices 30287 

instructions on connecting to eLibrary refer to the 

last page of this notice. Copies of the appendices 

were sent to all those receiving this notice in the 

mail. 

Land Requirements for Construction 

The proposed storage field site would 

be comprised of both state and private 

land totaling approximately 2,050 acres. 

Approximately 710 acres would be 

required for permanent facilities and 40 

acres for temporary construction. 

Construction of the proposed pipeline 

would result in a temporary disturbance 

of approximately 708 acres. 

The proposed 36-inch-diameter 

pipeline would generally be installed on 

BLM, state, and private land within a 

100-foot-wide construction right-of-way. 

At certain locations (e.g., road, railroad, 

and waterbody crossings), extra 

workspaces would be required. MGS 

would retain a 50-foot-wide permanent 

right-of-way for the pipeline. 

The EA/NEPA Process 

NEPA requires the Commission to 

take into account the environmental 

impacts that could result from an action 

whenever it considers the issuance of a 

Certificate of Public Convenience and 

Necessity. The EA is being prepared to 

serve that purpose. NEPA also requires 

Commission staff and its cooperators to 

discover and address concerns the 

public may have about the proposal. 

This process is referred to as ‘‘scoping.’’ 

The main goal of the scoping process is 

to focus the analysis in the EA on the 

important environmental issues. By this 

NOI, the Commission and BLM staff 

request public comments on any issues 

that may arise during the scoping period 

and need to be addressed in the EA/ 

Draft RMP Amendment. All scoping 

comments received will be considered 

during the preparation of the EA/Draft 

RMP Amendment. 

In the EA, we will discuss impacts 

that could occur as a result of the 

construction and operation of the 

proposed Project under these general 

headings: 

• Geology and soils; 

• Mineral resources; 

• Land use (recreation, aesthetics/ 

visual resource management, special 

designations, and livestock grazing); 

• Water resources, riparian zones, 

and wetlands; 

• Cultural resources; 

• Vegetation; 

• Fisheries and wildlife; 

• Endangered and threatened species; 

• Air quality and noise; and 

• Public safety. 

We will also evaluate possible 

alternatives to the proposed Project, and 

make recommendations on how to 

lessen or avoid impacts on the various 

resource areas. 

Although no formal application has 

been filed, we have already initiated our 

NEPA review under the Commission’s 

Pre-filing Process. The purpose of the 

Pre-filing Process is to seek public and 

agency input early in the Project 

planning phase and encourage early 

involvement of interested stakeholders 

in a manner that allows for the early 

identification and resolution of 

environmental issues before an 

application is filed with the FERC. The 

BLM has agreed to conduct its work 

with all interested stakeholders to 

identify and attempt to address issues 

before and throughout the application 

process. 

As part of our Pre-filing Process 

review, FERC has begun to contact some 

federal and state agencies to discuss 

their involvement in the scoping 

process and the preparation of the EA. 

In addition, representatives from the 

FERC participated in a public open 

house sponsored by MGS in Delta, Utah 

on March 3, 2009, to explain the 

environmental review process to 

interested stakeholders. On April 8, 

2009, the FERC conducted an 

interagency meeting with agencies and 

MGS in Salt Lake City, Utah. The 

purpose of the meeting was to explain 

the FERC’s process and solicit 

comments and concerns about the 

MGS’s Project from other jurisdictional 

agencies. 

Our independent analysis of the 

issues will be discussed in the EA. The 

EA/Draft RMP Amendment will be 

published and mailed to federal, state, 

and local agencies, public interest 

groups, interested individuals, affected 

landowners, newspapers, libraries, and 

the Commission’s official service list for 

this proceeding. 

A 30-day review and comment period 

will be provided when the EA/Draft 

RMP Amendment are published. The 

Proposed Plan Amendment for the Pony 

Express RMP will be provided a 30-day 

protest period at that time, 

commensurate with a 60-day Governor’s 

Consistency Review in accordance with 

Title 43 CFR Part 1600. All comments 

on the EA will be considered before the 

recommendations to the Commission 

are made. To ensure your comments are 

considered, please carefully follow the 

instructions in the Public Participation 

section below. 

The BLM’s Plan Amendment Process 

As discussed above, the EA will 

analyze the impacts of amending the 

Pony Express RMP to accommodate the 

Proposal. An amendment is required 

because the Pony Express RMP (1990) 

does not currently allow for major 

rights-of-way to be placed outside of 

identified utility corridors. Publication 

of this notice formally initiates the plan 

amendment process and begins the 

scoping process. An interdisciplinary 

approach will be used to develop the EA 

in order to consider a variety of resource 

issues and concerns identified. An 

amendment to the Pony Express RMP 

will be based upon the following 

planning criteria: 

• The amendment will be completed 

in compliance with the Federal Land 

Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), 

NEPA and all other relevant Federal 

law, Executive Orders and management 

policies of the BLM; 

• Where existing planning decisions 

are still valid, those decisions will 

remain unchanged and be incorporated 

into the new amendment; 

• The amendment will recognize 

valid existing rights; and 

• Native American Tribal 

consultations will be conducted in 

accordance with policy and tribal 

concerns will be given due 

consideration. The planning process 

would include the consideration of any 

impacts on Indian trust assets. 

The BLM regulations in Title 43 CFR 

Part 1600 and the NEPA process 

detailed in the Council on 

Environmental Quality regulations in 

Title 40 CFR Parts 1500–1508 guide 

preparation of plan amendments. The 

process is tailored to the anticipated 

level of public interest and potential for 

significant impacts. 

Plan amendments (see Title 43 CFR 

Part 1610.5–5) change one or more of 

the terms, conditions, or decisions of an 

approved land use plan. These 

decisions may include those relating to 

desired outcomes; measures to achieve 

desired outcomes, including resource 

restrictions; or land tenure decisions. 

Plan amendments are required to 

consider any proposal or action that 

does not conform to the plan. 

An applicant may request that the 

BLM amend the land use plan to allow 

an otherwise non-conforming proposal. 

The amendment and any 

implementation actions (i.e., granting 

the Right-of-Way and Temporary Use 

Permit) may be considered together. 

However, at the decision stage, the land 

use plan decisions must be separated 

from the implementation decisions. 

Currently Identified Environmental 

Issues 

The EA will discuss impacts that 

could occur as a result of the 

construction and operation of the 

proposed Project. We have already 

identified several issues that we think 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
30288 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 121 / Thursday, June 25, 2009 / Notices 

1Adams Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Buckeye 

Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Butler Rural 

Electric Cooperative, Inc., Carroll Electric 

Cooperative, Inc., Consolidated Electric 

Cooperative, Inc., Darke Rural Electric Cooperative, 

Inc., Firelands Electric Cooperative, Inc., The 

Frontier Power Company, Ouernsey-Mnskingum 

Electric Cooperative, Inc., Hancock-Wood Electric 

Cooperative, Inc., Holmes-Wayne Electric 

Cooperative, Inc., Licking Rural Electrification, Inc., 

Logan County Cooperative Power and Light 

Association, Inc., Lorain-Medina Rural Electric 

Cooperative, Inc., Mid-Ohio Energy Cooperative. 

Inc., Midwest Electric, Inc., North Central Electric 

Cooperative, Inc., North Western Electric 

Cooperative, Inc., Paulding-Putnam Electric 

Cooperative, Inc., Pioneer Rural Electric 

Cooperative, Inc., South Central Power Company, 

Tricounty Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Union 

Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., and Washington 

Electric Cooperative, Inc. 

deserve attention based on a 

preliminary review of the proposed 

facilities, comments made to us at the 

MGS’s open house, preliminary 

consultations with other agencies, and 

the environmental information provided 

by MGS. This preliminary list of issues 

may be changed based on your 

comments and our analysis. Issues 

include, but are not limited to: 

• Cultural resources that may be 

affected by the Project; 

• Potential impacts on streams, 

riparian zones, and wetlands; 

• Rights-of-way required for proposed 

pipeline crossing of federal lands 

managed by the BLM and the FS; 

• Cumulative impacts of the proposed 

facilities combined with past, present, 

and reasonable foreseeable Projects; and 

• Assessment of alternatives, 

including alternative routes, that would 

avoid or reduce impacts on private and 

federal lands. 

Public Participation 

You can make a difference by 

providing us with your specific 

comments or concerns about MGS’s 

proposal. Your comments should focus 

on the potential environmental effects, 

reasonable alternatives, and measures to 

avoid or lessen environmental impacts. 

The more specific your comments, the 

more useful they will be. To ensure that 

your comments are timely and properly 

recorded, please send in your comments 

so that they will be received in 

Washington, DC on or before July 27, 

2009. 

For your convenience, there are three 

methods, which you can use to submit 

written comments to the Commission. 

In all instances please reference the 

Project docket numbers PF09–3–000 

with your submission. The Commission 

encourages electronic filing of 

comments and has dedicated eFiling 

expert staff available to assist you at 

202–502–8258 or efiling@ferc.gov. 

(1) You may file your comments 

electronically by using the Quick 

Comment feature, which is located on 

the Commission’s Internet Web site at 

http://www.ferc.gov under the link to 

Documents and Filings. A Quick 

Comment is an easy method for 

interested persons to submit text-only 

comments on a Project; 

(2) You may file your comments 

electronically by using the eFiling 

feature, which is located on the 

Commission’s Internet Web site at 

http://www.ferc.gov under the link to 

Documents and Filings. eFiling involves 

preparing your submission in the same 

manner as you would if filing on paper, 

and then saving the file on your 

computer’s hard drive. You will attach 

that file as your submission. New 

eFiling users must first create an 

account by clicking on ‘‘Sign up’’ or 

‘‘eRegister.’’ You will be asked to select 

the type of filing you are making. A 

comment on a particular project is 

considered a ‘‘Comment on a Filing;’’ or 

(3) You may file your comments via 

mail to the Commission by sending an 

original and two copies of your letter to: 

Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 

First St., NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 

20426. 

Label one copy of the comments for 

the attention of Gas Branch 2, PJ–11.2. 

You may also submit oral comments 

at one of two public scoping meetings 

identified earlier in this NOI. 

Becoming an Intervenor 

Once MGS formally files its 

applications with the Commission, you 

may want to become an ‘‘intervenor,’’ 

which is an official party to the 

proceeding. Intervenors play a more 

formal role in the process and are able 

to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be 

heard by the courts if they choose to 

appeal the Commission’s final ruling. 

An intervenor formally participates in a 

Commission proceeding by filing a 

request to intervene. Instructions for 

becoming an intervenor are included in 

the User’s Guide under the ‘‘e-filing’’ 

link on the Commission’s Web site. 

Please note that you may not request 

intervenor status at this time. You must 

wait until formal applications are filed 

with the Commission. 

Environmental Mailing List 

An effort is being made to send this 

notice to all individuals, organizations, 

and government entities interested in 

and/or potentially affected by the 

proposed Project. This includes all 

landowners who are potential right-ofway grantors, whose property may be 

used temporarily for Project purposes, 

or who own homes within certain 

distances of aboveground facilities (as 

defined in the Commission’s 

regulations). 

If you do not want to send comments 

at this time but still want to remain on 

our mailing list, please return the 

Information Request (Appendix 2). If 

you do not return the Information 

Request, you will be taken off the 

mailing list. 

Availability of Additional Information 

Additional information about the 

Project is available from the 

Commission’s Office of External Affairs, 

at 1–866–208–FERC or on the FERC 

Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) 

using the eLibrary link. Click on the 

eLibrary link, click on ‘‘General Search’’ 

and enter the docket number excluding 

the last three digits (i.e., PF09–3) in the 

Docket Number field. Be sure you have 

selected an appropriate date range. For 

assistance, please contact FERC Online 

Support at FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov 

or toll free at 1–866–208–3676, or for 

TTY, contact (202) 502–8659. The 

eLibrary link also provides access to the 

texts of formal documents issued by the 

Commission, such as orders, notices, 

and rulemakings. 

In addition, the Commission now 

offers a free service called 

eSubscription, which allows you to 

keep track of all formal issuances and 

submittals in specific dockets. This can 

reduce the amount of time you spend 

researching proceedings by 

automatically providing you with 

notification of these filings, document 

summaries and direct links to the 

documents. Go to http://www.ferc.gov/ 

esubscribenow.htm. 

Finally, public meetings or site visits 

will be posted on the Commission’s 

calendar located at http://www.ferc.gov/ 

EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along 

with other related information. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–14933 Filed 6–24–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. EL09–59–000] 

Buckeye Power, Inc., on Behalf of Itself 

and Members; Notice of Filing 

June 18, 2009. 

Take notice that on June 10, 2009, 

Buckeye Power, Inc. (Buckeye), on 

behalf of itself and its member electric 

distribution cooperatives (members),1


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES