alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LILM, Inc. (the            “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with            the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),            I,**George I. Norman, III**, Chief            Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to            18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,            that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly            presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of            the Company.

 

| /s/ | **GEORGEI.NORMAN,III** |
|-----|------------------------|

 

**George I. Norman, III**

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Accounting Officer

May 14, 2008

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or            other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that            appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been            provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the            Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing            certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906            of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63            of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as            a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 410 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 410

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         March 9, 2020.
Whereas the Korean Peninsula, with the Republic of Korea (in this resolution 
        referred to as ``South Korea'') in the South and the Democratic People's 
        Republic of Korea (in this resolution referred to as ``North Korea'') in 
        the North, remains divided following the signing of the Korean War 
        Armistice Agreement on July 27, 1953;
Whereas the division of the Korean Peninsula separated more than 10,000,000 
        Korean family members, including some who are now citizens of the United 
        States;
Whereas there have been 21 rounds of family reunions between South Koreans and 
        North Koreans along the border since 2000;
Whereas Congress signaled its support for family reunions between United States 
        citizens and their relatives in North Korea in section 1265 of the 
        National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110-
        181), signed into law by President George W. Bush on January 28, 2008;
Whereas most of the population of divided family members in the United States, 
        initially estimated at 100,000 in 2001, has significantly dwindled as 
        many of the individuals have passed away;
Whereas the summit between North Korea and South Korea on April 27, 2018, has 
        prioritized family reunions;
Whereas the United States and North Korea have engaged in talks during 2 
        historic summits in June 2018 in Singapore and February 2019 in Hanoi; 
        and
Whereas many Korean Americans are waiting for a chance to meet their relatives 
        in North Korea for the first time in more than 60 years: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) calls on the United States and North Korea to begin the process 
        of reuniting Korean-American divided family members with their immediate 
        relatives through ways such as--
                    (A) identifying divided families in the United States and 
                North Korea who are willing and able to participate in a pilot 
                program for family reunions;
                    (B) finding matches for members of such families through 
                organizations such as the Red Cross; and
                    (C) working with the Government of South Korea to include 
                American citizens in inter-Korean video reunions;
            (2) reconfirms the institution of family as inalienable and, 
        accordingly, urges the restoration of contact between divided families 
        physically, literarily, or virtually; and
            (3) calls on the United States and North Korea to pursue reunions as 
        a humanitarian priority of immediate concern.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### In the Matter of Randolph W., Appellant, v Commissioner of Social Services, on Behalf of Ana B., Respondent.

Submitted June 10, 2013;

decided August 27, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martin Heidgen, Appellant.

Submitted March 11, 2013;

decided August 27, 2013

*1034Motion to require respondent to provide appellant’s counsel with a copy of respondent’s supplementary appendix granted.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 356 

Expressing support for designation of May as ‘‘National Asthma and Allergy 

Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2019 

Mr. ENGEL (for himself, Mr. UPTON, and Mr. KING of New York) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of May as ‘‘National 

Asthma and Allergy Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas 6,200,000, or 8.4 percent, of children in the United 

States currently have asthma; 

Whereas 25,200,000, or one in 13 people in the United 

States have asthma, and the numbers are increasing each 

year; 

Whereas on average, in 2013, children missed 5 days of 

school and adults missed 4 days of work because of asthma; 

Whereas asthma is the second most common noncommunicable disease among children; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 356 IH 

Whereas 2,000,000 individuals per year visit emergency departments because of asthma’s effects; 

Whereas the total economic cost of asthma was $81.9 billion 

per year from 2008 to 2013 in the United States; 

Whereas fewer than half of people with asthma report being 

given an asthma action plan, which is key to the prevention of asthma attacks; 

Whereas asthma is a manageable disease; and 

Whereas May would be an appropriate month to designate as 

‘‘National Asthma and Allergy Awareness Month’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Asth3 ma and Allergy Awareness Month’’; 

4 (2) encourages awareness of the prevalence of 

5 asthma and allergies, including heightened preva6 lence among women, minority, and urban demo7 graphics; 

8 (3) recognizes and salutes health care profes9 sionals who treat asthma and allergy-related health 

10 issues; 

11 (4) recognizes and salutes researchers working 

12 to identify asthma and allergy cures; 

13 (5) recognizes and reaffirms commitment to 

14 public education about asthma and allergy treatment 

15 and symptoms and to advancing care for both asth16 ma and allergy conditions; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 356 IH 

1 (6) supports investment in researching the pre2 vention, treatment, and eradication of asthma. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Date: November 8, 2007
    /s/ Joshua G. JamesJoshua G. JamesPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Date: November 8, 2007
    /s/ Michael S. HerringMichael S. HerringChief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)
No. 4895.

(Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.)

#### N. A. MORANO vs. MRS. M. A. HARDY.

Dinkelspiel, Hart & Davey for plaintiff and appellee.

T. M. & J. D. Miller and C. F. Fletchinger for defendant and appellant.

*12November 29, 1909.

DUEOUR, J.

Considering the motion on file herein suggesting to the Court that the matters in controversy in this cause have been amicably adjusted.

It is ordered that the appeal herein be, and the same is dismissed at appellant’s cost.
Schedule II


                      CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
                     VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                     FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
[CAPTION]
                               (In Millions)

<TABLE>
                                            Additions
                                      ----------------------
                           Balance at Charged to  Charged                Balance
                           Beginning   Costs and   to Other              At End
Description                of Period   Expenses   Accounts   Deductions   of Period
-----------               ----------- ----------- ---------  ----------  ----------
<S>                           <C>         <C>       <C>         <C>          <C>
                                                    (1)

1994
Casualty reserves
   Current...............    $ 93                             $(10) (2)      $103
   Noncurrent............     132        $175      $ 12        107  (3)       212

Allowance for disposition
  of property and
  equipment (4)...........    256                               15            241


1995
Casualty reserves
   Current...............     103                               (4) (2)       107
   Noncurrent............     212         174        14        183  (3)       217

Allowance for disposition
  of property and
  equipment (4) (5).......    241         261                   63            439


1996
Casualty reserves
   Current...............     107                              (31) (2)       138
   Noncurrent............     217         168        11        206  (3)       190

Allowance for disposition
  of property and
  equipment (4)............   439                               31            408



(1)  Includes charges to property accounts in connection with construction
     projects and the recording of receivables from third parties.

(2)  Includes net transfers from noncurrent.

(3)  Transfers to current.

(4)  Deductions of $15 million, $63 million and $31 million in 1994, 1995
     and 1996, respectively, represent net losses on asset dispositions.

(5)  In 1995, the Company recorded an asset disposition charge, which
     resulted from a review of the Company's route system and other operating
     assets to determine those that no longer effectively and economically
     support current and expected operations.  The Company identified and has
     committed to sell 1,800 miles of rail lines that are expected to provide
     proceeds substantially less than net book value.  In addition, other
     assets, principally yards and side tracks, identified for disposition have
     been written down to estimated net realizable value.


                                    S-1
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Smith, Appellant, v Harold D. Graham, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[977 NYS2d 663]

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Scudder, EJ., Peradotto, Garni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 13

- 13000 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:13

- cr
- 00006

- RV

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus CORINE D. MOTLEY , a.k.a. Corine Gillreath,
Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Ap peal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

________________________ ( February 25, 2014 )
Before HULL , MARCUS and WILSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 13-13000 Date Filed: 02/25/2014 Page: 1 of 22 Michael Ufferman , appointed coun sel for Corine D. Motley in this direct criminal appeal , has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of t he relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Motley ’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 13-13000 Date Filed: 02/25/2014 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.1
                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gaye Adams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Online  Originals,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small
business issuer and I have:

     a)    designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
           material information relating to the small business issuer, including
           its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within
           those  entities,   particularly  during  the  period  in  which  this
           quarterly report is being prepared;

     b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
           controls  and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days  prior to the
           filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)    presented in this report our  conclusions about the  effectiveness of
           the disclosure controls and  procedures based on our evaluation as of
           the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business
issuer's  auditors and the audit  committee of small business  issuer's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)    all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could  adversely  affect the small  business  issuer's
           ability to record,  process,  summarize and report financial data and
           have identified for the small business issuer's auditors any material
           weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who  have a significant role in the small business issuer's
           internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes
in  internal  controls  or in other  factors  that  could  significantly  affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.

Date:    October 15, 2007


By:      /s/ Gaye Adams
         -------------------------------
         Gaye Adams
         President and CEO
| (1)    | The      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,      2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and        |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods presented in the    Report. |

| /s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.Theodore      H. Bunting, Jr.Senior      Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer ofEntergy      New Orleans, Inc.(acting      principal financial officer) |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Toussant Dent, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 875]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William McGuire, J.), rendered August 5, 2011, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of possession of an imitation pistol, and sentencing him to a conditional discharge, unanimously affirmed.

The information was not jurisdictionally defective. “[A]s a matter of common sense and reasonable pleading” *(People v Davis,*13 NY3d 17, 31 [2009]), the allegation that the imitation pistol was “all black in color,” sufficiently negated both the permissible-colors exception set forth in Administrative Code of City of NY § 10-131 (g) (1) (a) and the transparent/translucent materials exception set forth in section 10-131 (g) (1) (b) *(see People v Delarosa,*27 Misc 3d 1209[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 50636[U], *4-5 [Crim Ct, NY County 2010]). Concur — Tom, J.P, Mazzarelli, Freedman, Richter and Feinman, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000810999
<NAME> 87A
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         339,531
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  324,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               664,363
<PP&E>                                      20,183,108
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,382,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,464,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,651
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,418,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,464,619
<SALES>                                      1,750,425
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,775,470
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,264,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                511,237
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            511,237
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   511,237
<EPS-BASIC>                                      17.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Eric J. Koch, D.O., Respondent, v James G. Sheehan, New York State Medicaid Inspector General, Appellant.

Submitted February 11, 2013;

decided February 14, 2013

Motion by Medical Society of the State of New York for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and nine copies filed within seven days.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





The Board of Directors
FirstFed Financial Corp.:





We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (No.
333-33463;033-63207) on Form S-8 of FirstFed Financial Corp. of our report dated
January 28, 2004, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition
of FirstFed Financial Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and
the related  consolidated  statements of operations and comprehensive  earnings,
stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the  years in the  three-year
period ended  December 31, 2003,  which report  appears in the December 31, 2003
annual report on Form 10-K of FirstFed Financial Corp.


                                 KPMG LLP





Los Angeles, California
March 5, 2004
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 15, 2015

NO. 03-14-00028-CV

In the Matter of C. B

APPEAL FROM 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the trial court’s December 13, 2013 order transferring C.B. to the 

custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division and the trial court’s 

December 11, 2013 order that he register as a sex offender pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal 

Procedure chapter 62. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds 

that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s orders. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s orders. Because C.B. is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is 

made.
#### Stan LABER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Francis J. HARVEY, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-1082.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 15, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 17, 2006.

Stan Laber, Appellant Pro Se.

Ralph Andrew Price, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Stan Laber appeals the district court’s order dismissing his suit for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Laber v. Harvey,*No. 1:05-cv-00803-CMH (E.D.Va. Nov. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*