alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

3rd DISTRICT OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12547 \^JE£PEIpjYiE_

Austin, Texas 78711-2547 July 12, 2015

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-15-00397-CV

Trial Court Number: D-13-0197-C

STYLE: ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE DOLLARS IN U.S CURRENCY VS

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE HONORABLE CLERK OF SAID COURT:

My name is Jason Dale Whitlock, appellant in the above referenced and

styled cause number. I have recently received tuo notices from the Clerk of

the Court of Appeals.

The first notice which uas dated June 30, 2015: I did not receive until

July 8, 2015 @ approximately 11:00am, informing me that I uas required to

pay a filing fee of $195.00 and send a docketing list by July 10, 2015.

The second notice from the Court of Appeals uas dated July 1, 2015 and

uas directed to the Tom Green County District Clerks office uich uas stating

to the District Clerk that the clerk's records uere due in This Court on June

25, 2015 and uas over-due. I have been having complications uith the Tom Green

County District Clerk's office and have been having difficulties getting them

to respond back to any urits or requests filed uith their office.

On Feb. 4, 2014, I filed an "Affidavit of Indigency" and uas recognized

as an idigent offender regarding cause number D-13-0197-C. Furthermore, I

had requested on multiple occassions for the District Courts "Docket Roster"

or docketing list and never received a response or acknouledgement regarding

this issue, so you uill have to refer to the Clerk's records in this matter.

A "Declaration of inability to pay costs" uas also filed seperately but

I understand this is voided in this matter. Could you please inform me if

the Trail Court recognized me as indigent in this cause or if I am still required

to pay the filing fee's? And if I am required to pay the Court Fees, could

payment arrangements be scheduled...? I uas simply unable to make any arrangements

from the day I received the notice, (July 8, 2015) until the deadline that

they uere due. (July 10, 2015).

Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter, it is greatly

appreciated.

Sincerely,

Jason Whitlock # 1877065

/RECEIVED ^

JUL 1 5 2015

THIRD CC'JRT OF ACFEALS

XfffTun^^

1697 F.M. 980

Huntsville, Texas 77343
dawn hV/iTTTec^tf /87706TV%££7* C7/?i77~

(697 J*M. 98o

NORTH HOUSTON TX

13 JUL 2G1S PM 9 L

H.H,l,I»J,i.|,i}plIi,|H{Hh«.,iJW»I.ll,lM«»'l'Ui
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

d1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145565

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145565

COA: 307732

Wayne CC: 02-014810-FH

ELIZABETH LLOYD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 8, 2012 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### In the Matter of Gabriel J. and Another, Children Alleged to be Neglected. O’Neill H. et al., Respondents; Dainee A., Appellant. (And Another Proceeding.)

Submitted November 13, 2012;

decided January 10, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal from the October 2012 Appellate Division order dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 607 

Supporting the goals and ideals of the International Day of Non-Violence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 

Ms. MENG (for herself, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. NORTON, and Mrs. DINGELL) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of the International Day 

of Non-Violence. 

Whereas the United Nations General Assembly established 

the International Day of Non-Violence on June 15, 2007, 

to disseminate the message of non-violence, through 

means such as education and public awareness; 

Whereas, the United Nations General Assembly has stated 

that ‘‘non-violence, tolerance, full respect for all human 

rights and fundamental freedoms for all, democracy, development, mutual understanding and respect for diversity are interlinked and mutually reinforcing’’; 

Whereas the annual International Day of Non-Violence celebration date, October 2, was chosen to commemorate the 

birthday of Mohandas K. Gandhi, more commonly known 

as ‘‘Mahatma’’, which means ‘‘great soul’’; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 607 IH 

Whereas Mahatma Gandhi was a world-renowned civil rights 

and spiritual leader, who experienced injustices early in 

life, and learned to embrace the principles of non-violence 

as a vehicle for social and political change; 

Whereas Mahatma Gandhi was influenced by religious teachings in Hinduism, Jainism, and Christianity in the development of his philosophy; 

Whereas Mahatma Gandhi was a major influence for Martin 

Luther King, Jr., whose emphasis on non-violence is 

credited with ushering in our Nation’s civil rights; and 

Whereas people around the world commemorate the International Day of Non-Violence by participating in volunteer projects as a way to give back to their communities: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of the Inter3 national Day of Non-Violence; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the International Day of Non-Violence 

6 with appropriate ceremonies, programs, and activi7 ties. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brekford International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ryan E. Kirch, Principal Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ Ryan E. Kirch          
| | Ryan E. Kirch              
| | Principal Financial Officer
| |                            
| | Date: August 14, 2008      
| |                            



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[992 NE2d 420, 970 NYS2d 492]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Curtis L. Mason, Appellant.

Decided June 11, 2013

*963APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Mary J. Fahey,*Syracuse, for appellant.

*Barry L. Porsch, District Attorney,*Waterloo, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the case remitted to that Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.

On appeal, defendant argued that the jury’s verdict was against the weight of the evidence. The order of the Appellate Division (101 AD3d 1659 [2012]), however, “ ‘manifests] a lack of application of that review power’ ” *(People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633, 646 [2006], quoting *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 496 [1987]). Consequently, we must reverse and remit for a proper consideration of the claim. Defendant’s remaining contention lacks merit.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.
Exhibit10.34-AmendmenttoIncentivePlanforExecutiveOfficersEDGARversion05012013








AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED & RESTATED
AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING, INC.
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS




THIS AMENDMENT is made this 1st day of May, 2013 by American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. (“AAM”).


WHEREAS, AAM adopted the Amended & Restated American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers effective January 1, 2006 (the “Plan”); 


WHEREAS, pursuant to the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (the “Compensation Committee”) may amend the Plan at its discretion; and


WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee desires to amend the Plan to clarify the meaning of a defined term contained in the Plan as set forth below:


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended to state as follows effective as of January 1, 2013:


1. Section 1.10 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:


1.10  Cash Flow means the cash provided by and used in the Company’s operating activities for the Plan Year in question less the Company’s capital expenditures net of proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment for the Plan Year in question, all as determined by the Company in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and as reported in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the Plan Year.


    
Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan. 


The Compensation Committee hereby authorizes the Vice President, Human Resources of AAM to execute this Amendment to the Plan.


This Amendment is executed as of the date set forth above. 


	
	
	AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING, INC.

	 

	By:  /s/ Terri M. Kemp

	Terri M. Kemp

	Vice President, Human Resources
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                                 AMERALIA, INC.

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
Principal Executive Officer

         To my knowledge: the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
June 30, 2003, containing financial statements for the period then ended, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934;
and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
AmerAlia, Inc. for the periods presented.

November 19, 2002



  /s/ Bill H Gunn
-----------------
Bill H. Gunn
Principal Executive Officer

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
Principal Financial Officer

         To my knowledge: the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
June 30, 2003, containing financial statements for the period then ended, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934;
and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
AmerAlia, Inc. for the periods presented.

November 19, 2002



  /s/ Robert van Mourik
-----------------------
Robert C.J. van Mourik
Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-118845 and 333-129231) of Blue Ridge Real Estate Company (Blue Ridge) and Big Boulder Corporation (Big Boulder), of our reports, dated February 2, 2006 with respect to the combined financial statements of Blue Ridge and Big Boulder and the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the October 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Blue Ridge and Big Boulder.







/s/ Parente Randolph, LLC



Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

February 9, 2006
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements of Empire Banc Corporation on Form S-8 (Registration Statement
Nos. 33-58578, 333-36747, 333-63759), of our report dated January 21, 1999
on the consolidated financial statements of Empire Banc Corporation, as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1998, which report is included in the 1998 Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Empire Banc Corporation.




<TABLE>
<S>                                    <S>

                                        /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP 
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 25, 1999

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME (BOTH DATED 12/31/95) AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             273
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                    13416
<ALLOWANCES>                                       406
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                             451<F3>
<DEPRECIATION>                                     268<F3>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   15717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                           7793<F4>
<COMMON>                                            53
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        115
<OTHER-SE>                                        1335<F5>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     15717
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2398<F6>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      816<F7>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1016<F8>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   295
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0<F9>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    270
<INCOME-TAX>                                       120
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                150
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       150
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.70
<FN>
<F1>CURRENT MARKETABLE EQUITY SECURITIES ARE NOT SEPARATELY STATED
<F2>DO NOT PREPARE CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
<F3>PP&E PER BALANCE SHEET (183.1) IS SHOWN NET OF DEPRECIATION.
<F4>LONG-TERM DEBT PER BALANCE SHEET
<F5>INCLUDES ADDITIONAL CAPITAL (270.0), NET UNREALIZED GAIN ON INVESTMENT
(18.4), FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION ADJ (-46.4), AND RETAINED EARNINGS
(1093.0) PER BALANCE SHEET = 1335.0
<F6>INCLUDES FINANCE CHARGES AND FEES (2014.6), INSURANCE PREMIUMS (152.7) AND
OTHER REVENUE (230.9) PER INCOME STATEMENT = 2398.2
<F7>INTEREST EXPENSE PER INCOME STATEMENT.
<F8>INCLUDES SALARIES & BENEFITS (384.6), INSURANCE BENEFITS (80.4), PROVISION FOR
RESTRUCTURING (9.8) AND OTHER (541.6) PER INCOME STATEMENT = 1016.4
<F9>COMPANY'S PRIMARY COST OF GENERATING REVENUE IS INTERST EXPENSE WHICH IS
INCLUDED IN TOTAL COSTS (ABOVE).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEKName:
    
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    
    Chairman of the Board of DirectorsChief Financial Officer and President of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    November 12, 2010
Ex 10(e)4 10-Q 6.30.13






Exhibit 10(e)4
BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY


The following are the annual base salaries, effective March 1, 2013, of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Mississippi Power Company and certain other executive officers of Mississippi Power Company who have served during 2013.




	
		
	G. Edison Holland, Jr.*
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$652,133

	Moses Feagin
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
	$245,309

	John W. Atherton
Vice President
	$252,659

	Jeff G. Franklin
Vice President
	$249,059

	Edward Day, VI**
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$418,454

	Thomas O. Anderson***
Vice President
	$199,906






__________
*    Mr. Holland was elected President and Chief Executive Officer effective May 20, 2013
**    Mr. Day retired effective May 20, 2013
***    Mr. Anderson retired effective May 31, 2013
Exhibit 32.6
                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-F  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 13th day of November, 2007.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-F
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-F and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-F and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Joseph Murray, Appellant, v Suzanne Murray, Respondent.

Submitted February 4, 2013;

decided March 26, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00036-CV

In the Interest of J.V. and D.V., 

children

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 2

of Wichita County (12202-JR-F)

July 9, 2015

Opinion by Justice Gardner

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Anne Gardner_____________

 Justice Anne Gardner
#### Frances Calderon, Respondent, v Noonan Towers Company LLC et al., Appellants.

[823 NYS2d 135]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered January 11, 2006, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff was allegedly injured when she fell after catching *496her heel in a cracked or broken portion of the threshold to the vestibule of defendants’ building. A triable issue of facts exists regarding whether the alleged defective condition is actionable *(see Trincere v County of Suffolk,*90 NY2d 976 [1997]). Questions of fact were also raised, from the photographs and defendants’ superintendent’s deposition testimony, as to whether defendants had constructive notice of the defect *(see Taylor v New York City Tr. Auth.,*48 NY2d 903 [1979]; *see also Batton v Elghanayan,*43 NY2d 898 [1978]). Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Saxe, Sullivan and McGuire, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Max Crane, Deceased. Alan M. Crane, Respondent; Judith Hollander, Appellant.

Submitted May 28, 2013;

decided June 27, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.