alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000833054
<NAME>                         GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP II-C

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                            240,940
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     315,924
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  556,864
<PP&E>                          9,270,863
<DEPRECIATION>                  8,096,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,861,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              48,059
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                      1,758,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,861,021
<SALES>                           861,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  871,345
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     382,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   489,250
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               489,250
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      489,250
<EPS-BASIC>                          2.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0



</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Augustine Molina Leal, * From the 91st District Court

of Eastland County,

Trial Court No. 22707.

Vs. No. 11-15-00031-CR * July 16, 2015

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

Willson, J., and McCall, sitting by

assignment)

(Bailey, J., not participating)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC.*

|                                                       |  | Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Baltimore Gas and Electric Company.                    |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Holdings, Inc.                           |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Investments, Inc.                        |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Power, Inc.                              |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Real Estate Group, Inc.                  |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Enterprises, Inc.                        |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc.           |  | Delaware                     
|Constellation Energy Projects and Services Group, Inc. |  | Delaware                     
|Safe Harbor Water Power Corporation                    |  | Pennsylvania                 
|BGE Home Products & Services, Inc.                     |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Energy Resources, LLC                    |  | Delaware                     
|Constellation NewEnergy, Inc.                          |  | Delaware                     
|Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC                |  | Maryland                     
|Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Inc.               |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Power Source Generation, Inc.            |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Power Source Holdings, Inc.              |  | Maryland                     
|BGE Capital Trust II                                   |  | Delaware                     
|Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC                   |  | Delaware                     
|R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC                   |  | Maryland                     



---





QuickLinks
3

FY16-FY20 Gaming Revenues by Range

Number of Revenues Mean Median

Gaming Revenue Range Submissions (in thousands) Submissions Revenues (in thousands) (in thousands)

Submissions with fiscal years ending in 2020

$250 million and over 22 $10,250,430 4.2% 36.8% $465,929 $419,028

$100 million to $250 million 58 $9,667,030 11.1% 34.7% $166,673 $162,040

$50 million to $100 million 43 $3,179,021 8.2% 11.4% $73,931 $73,656

$25 million to $50 million 65 $2,396,995 12.4% 8.6% $36,877 $36,114

$10 million to $25 million 101 $1,646,696 19.3% 5.9% $16,304 $15,721

$3 million to $10 million 94 $566,973 17.9% 2.0% $6,032 $5,714

Under $3 million 141 $125,271 26.9% 0.5% $888 $551

Total 524 $27,832,416

Submissions with fiscal years ending in 2019

$250 million and over 33 $15,629,916 6.3% 45.2% $473,634 $386,381

$100 million to $250 million 62 $10,444,602 11.9% 30.2% $168,461 $165,864

$50 million to $100 million 54 $3,798,391 10.3% 11.0% $70,341 $66,958

$25 million to $50 million 67 $2,360,435 12.8% 6.8% $35,230 $34,292

$10 million to $25 million 97 $1,630,332 18.6% 4.7% $16,808 $16,185

$3 million to $10 million 90 $594,918 17.2% 1.7% $6,610 $6,824

Under $3 million 119 $119,948 22.8% 0.3% $1,008 $721

Total 522 $34,578,542

Submissions with fiscal years ending in 2018

$250 million and over 34 $15,702,390 6.8% 46.6% $461,835 $381,315

$100 million to $250 million 59 $9,658,287 11.8% 28.6% $163,700 $163,221

$50 million to $100 million 52 $3,668,802 10.4% 10.9% $70,554 $68,739

$25 million to $50 million 69 $2,439,840 13.8% 7.2% $35,360 $33,559

$10 million to $25 million 94 $1,554,036 18.8% 4.6% $16,532 $16,277

$3 million to $10 million 91 $590,180 18.2% 1.8% $6,485 $6,675

Under $3 million 102 $106,033 20.4% 0.3% $1,040 $910

Total 501 $33,719,569

Submissions with fiscal years ending in 2017

$250 million and over 33 $15,016,924 6.7% 46.3% $455,058 $363,086

$100 million to $250 million 56 $9,058,782 11.3% 28.0% $161,764 $164,374

$50 million to $100 million 54 $3,767,470 10.9% 11.6% $69,768 $69,893

$25 million to $50 million 68 $2,382,602 13.8% 7.4% $35,038 $32,287

$10 million to $25 million 91 $1,494,558 18.4% 4.6% $16,424 $15,749

$3 million to $10 million 89 $575,005 18.0% 1.8% $6,461 $6,754

Under $3 million 103 $108,586 20.9% 0.3% $1,054 $883

Total 494 $32,403,927

Submissions with fiscal years ending in 2016

$250 million and over 33 $14,429,248 6.8% 46.3% $437,250 $363,632

$100 million to $250 million 51 $8,286,641 10.5% 26.6% $162,483 $166,810

$50 million to $100 million 57 $4,011,478 11.8% 12.9% $70,377 $67,928

$25 million to $50 million 67 $2,290,169 13.8% 7.3% $34,182 $32,673

$10 million to $25 million 96 $1,561,863 19.8% 5.0% $16,269 $15,825

$3 million to $10 million 85 $521,096 17.6% 1.7% $6,131 $6,420

Under $3 million 95 $95,055 19.6% 0.3% $1,001 $723

Total 484 $31,195,549

Source: Compiled from gaming operation audit reports received and entered by the NIGC through 8/2/2021

NIGC Tribal Gaming Revenues

Percentage of
Exhibit 31.2 

CERTIFICATION

I, David C. Dreyer, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 of BIOLASE, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

|                              |        |                                                   |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Date: April 29, 2015

  |
|                         |   |
| By:                          |   | /s/ DAVID C. DREYER                               |
|                         |   | David C. Dreyer                                   |
|                         |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                         |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                     |
#### In the Matter of Empire Center for New York State Policy, Appellant, v Teachers’ Retirement System of the City of New York, Respondent.

Submitted April 8, 2013;

decided June 26, 2013

Motion by the Albany Times Union et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed.

Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
3/16/2015 Attachment 6
3/16/2015 Attachment 6
3/16/2015 Attachment 6
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------



                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathon M. Singer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

      i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
            section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
            of 1934; and

      ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
            in all material respects, the financial condition and
            result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




                                    /s/ Jonathon M. Singer
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    Jonathon M. Singer
                                    Chief Financial Officer



May 9, 2008
#### THE M-48. LEARY v. CITY OF NEW YORK.

No. 17074.

District Court, E. D. Now York.

May 7, 1945.

Hagen & Eidenbach, of New York City (Charles W. Hagen and Nelson J. Johnson, both of New York City, of counsel), for libelant.

Ignatius M. Wilkinson, Corporation Counsel, of New York .City (Herbert B. Lee and Edwin M. Bourke, both of New York City, of counsel), for City of New York. .

KENNEDY, District Judge.

In a memorandum dated March 13, 1945, I suggested that counsel submit findings of *149fact and conclusions of law. Both sides did this. I have, however, prepared my own ■findings of fact and conclusions of law. I treated the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law submitted by counsel in the same way as I would a memorandum on the facts in the case.

I mention this merely because the proposed findings of the respondent contain a great many items which the evidence in the case in no way bears put. In my decision and findings I rely very largely on the testimony of the respondent’s own representative, Captain Patrick McCarthy, whose testimony I thought was completely honest. During his testimony at the trial this witness was actually enraged by the, suggestion that either he had been a party to the acceptance of a defective scow, or that he had attested (in the outgoing survey) to items of damage that could have been produced by ordinary wear and tear. At times he could scarcely contain himself.

A great many of the proposed findings of the respondent find their explanation in the fact that, as the evidence discloses, in matters relating to the hiring of scows one municipal department was at loggerheads with another. This resulted in a great many belated contentions by respondent about unseaworthiness, alleged failure to report damage by scow-men and runners, omissions from the log of the Grabit, and all sorts of speculative matter which are reflected in respondent’s proposed findings.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 593 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the whistleblower 

complaint received on August 12, 2019, by the Inspector General of 

the Intelligence Community should be transmitted immediately to the 

Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select 

Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 

Mr. CURTIS (for himself, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. 

DIAZ-BALART, Mr. TIPTON, and Mr. STIVERS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the whistleblower complaint received on August 12, 2019, 

by the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community 

should be transmitted immediately to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent 

Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. 

1 Resolved, That — 

2 (1) the whistleblower complaint received on Au3 gust 12, 2019, by the Inspector General of the Intel4 ligence Community shall be transmitted immediately 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 593 IH 

1 to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Sen2 ate and the Permanent Select Committee on Intel3 ligence of the House of Representatives; and 

4 (2) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

5 Senate and the Permanent Select Committee on In6 telligence of the House of Representatives should be 

7 allowed to evaluate the complaint in a deliberate and 

8 bipartisan manner consistent with applicable stat9 utes and processes in order to safeguard classified 

10 and sensitive information. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Transition Report of Dreams, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/T for the nine months ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dorothy Sillano, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fully
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                            
|--- |  | ---------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Dorothy Sillano        
|    |  | Dorothy Sillano            
|    |  | Principal Financial Officer
|    |  | March 27, 2008
#### In the Matter of Almetta Rivers, Appellant, v New York City Department of Sanitation et al., Respondents.

[854 NYS2d 64]

Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the court did not convert the cross motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action into a motion for summary judgment without notice. Rather, the court, pursuant to CPLR 7804 (f), properly found that petitioner failed to state a legally cognizable cause of action that respondents acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or without a rational basis, where the record evidence establishes that the determination finding petitioner medically not qualified for the position of sanitation worker was rationally based upon the findings that she suffered from left ventricular hypertrophy and had elevated blood pressure. When arriving at its determination, respondents were entitled to rely on the conclusions of respondent Department of Sanitation’s medical director even in the face of conflicting opinions from petitioner’s physicians *(see McCabe v Hoberman,*33 AD2d 547 [1969]; *Matter of Winnegar v County of Suffolk,*13 AD3d 382 [2004]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ. *[See*2007 NY Slip Op 32740(U).]
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of ES Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Office
      of
      the Comptroller of the Currency on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony P.
      Costa, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date: November
              14, 2006
            /s/
              Anthony P. Costa
              Anthony
                P. Costa
              Chairman
                and Chief Executive
                Officer
Fernando Rodriguez

#01858563 Telford

3899 State liwy 98

New Boston, TX 75570

Keith Hottle

Clerk

Fourth Court of Appeals

300 Dolorosa St., Suite 3200

San Antonio, TX 78205-3037

RE: Copy of Petition for Discretionary Review—including Exhibits

Court of Criminal Appeals case number: PD-1357-14

Dear Mr. Hottle: July 8, 2015

need to purchase copy of my Petition for Discretionary Review—

including the Exhibits—in the above Court of Criminal Appeals case number.

When submitted the PDR, attached original documents as Exhibits that were

my only copies, as we have no access to copiers in prison. Thus, it is critical

that the Exhibits are included as part of this request. The clerk, Abel Acosta,

referred me to you in this matter. nn* -VU. Vw^AorffS |fcti*i -SV

Could you please respond with the pertinent cost information at your

earliest convenience? will promptly mail you certified funds.

Thank you for your courtesies.

Kindest regards.,

Fernando Rodriguez

CC: FR/file

Abel Acosta, Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals

P.O. Box 12308, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711
Order entered July 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00545-CR

PROMISE LASHAWN KELLEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-56130-I

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record in this 

case within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Felicia Pitre, Dallas County 

District Clerk, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
# FY20 Total Appropriation

NINDS receives its budget from the United States Congress as part of the federal budget process through appropriations for the Department of Health and Human Services and NIH.

### Current Fiscal Year (FY 2020) Budget

On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed into law a package of spending bills to fund the Federal Government for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020.  The map below describes the allocation of funds appropriated to NINDS in P.L. 116-94.  Although a significant portion of that budget is appropriated to extramural research, other parts of the budget fund specific extramural research initiatives and efforts that are supported by NINDS. Hover over an area of the budget to learn more about it.  Click onto an area of the budget to learn additional details, including the prior year expenditures.
> 

> 
Budget & Appropriations

FY20 Total Extramural Research Expenditures

RPG Success Rates and Payline

FY20 Funding Outcomes Data
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6834

ANDREW WINDSOR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

B. G. COMPTON, Warden, USP Lee,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CR-90-228, CA-03-251-7)

Submitted: September 30, 2003 Decided: October 8, 2003

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Windsor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Andrew Windsor, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Compton v. Windsor, Nos. CR-90-228, CA-03-251-7 (W.D.

Va. Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA, as Trustee for the Registered Holders of DJL Commercial Mortgage Corp., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1999-CG-2, Plaintiff, v E.M.V. Realty Corp. et al., Respondents, and RJR Mechanical, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Submitted August 13, 2012;

decided October 25, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### In the Matter of Willard Saperston, Appellant, v Heather Holdaway, Respondent.

Decided June 7, 2012

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 18-0391

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

JAMES BLAKE CONN,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Kathy Seeley, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Laurie McKinnon

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 3 2020

06/03/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0391