UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                  FORM 10-KSB/A


     [X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
                                   ACT OF 1934

                    FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2006

   [_] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
                                   ACT OF 1934

        FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______________ TO________________

                           COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-15840

                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.

                 (NAME OF SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER IN ITS CHARTER)

                    DELAWARE                                14-1688816
            ---------------------                           ----------
         (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION                      (IRS EMPLOYER
       OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)               IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)


                       8 MERRILL INDUSTRIAL DRIVE UNIT 12
                          HAMPTON, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03842
                    (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

                                 (603) 758-1333
                           (ISSUER'S TELEPHONE NUMBER)

    Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
                   of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"): NONE.

    Title of each class name of each exchange on which registered Securities
               registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

                    COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE.

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed under
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the Issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. |X| Yes |_| No


Check if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation
S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the
best of Issuer's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB/A or any amendment to
this Form 10-KSB/A. |X| Yes |_| No


Check whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). |_| Yes |X| No

The Issuer's revenues for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 were $630,575.

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
Issuer, computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold, or the
average bid and ask prices of such stock as of June 30, 2006, was $0.00 per
share. Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director, and
by certain persons who own 5% or more of the outstanding common stock, have been
excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination
of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other
purposes.

Number of shares outstanding of Issuer's common stock, $0.01 par value,
outstanding on June 30, 2006: 5,601,140.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: Certificate of Incorporation, By-laws and
Code of Ethics.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes |_|; No |X|
<PAGE>


                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                         Page
                                     PART I                            Number(s)
                                                                       ---------

Item 1.  Description of Business                                          2-7
Item 2.  Description of Property                                           8
Item 3.  Legal Proceedings                                                 8
Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders               8

                                     PART II

Item 5.  Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder                  8
         Matters
Item 6.  Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan                    8-13
         of Operations
Item 7.  Consolidated Financial Statements                                13
Item 8A. Controls and Procedures                                          15

                                    PART III

Item 9.  Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons;
         Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act                16
Item 10. Executive Compensation                                           17
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
         Management and Related Stockholder Matters                      17-18
Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions                   18
Item 13. Exhibits                                                         19
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services                           19

Signatures                                                                19


<PAGE>

                                                            Form 10-KSB/A Page 2

                                     PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

Kingston Systems Inc. ("Kingston" or the "Company") was incorporated in 1983 and
re-incorporated in Delaware on January 12, 1987. The Company operated a
proprietary recovery system that reclaimed paper pulp and non-biodegradable
polyethylene from packaging material scrap. The Company sold the recovered fiber
as substitute for virgin wood pulp and the reclaimed polyethylene for use in
injection molding. The Company experienced some difficult and turbulent periods
and subsequently made its last Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filing
of a 10-Q for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 1988. The
Company had remained dormant until August of 2005 when, as disclosed in a Form
8-K filed on August 19, 2005, the Company acquired all of the issued and
outstanding common stock of Parallel Robotics Systems Corporation ("Robotics"),
making Robotics a wholly-owned subsidiary (see Item 5 and Note 2).

Description of the Parallel Robotics business and products

Robotics is a New Hampshire corporation headquartered in Hampton, New Hampshire.
Robotics was formed in February 2002 when Robotics obtained a licensing
agreement from Hexel Corporation (see Note 4) to utilize their intellectual
property to build parallel robots. Robotics is engaged in the development,
manufacture and marketing, directly or through collaborations with one or more
third parties, of proprietary materials handling and machine technology, and
hardware and software based upon such technology, which is generally referred to
as hexapod technology.


Robotics is engaged in the development of technology, consisting of software and
robotic hardware, which is based upon mathematical models. These models enable
the creation of machinery and integrated computer software, known as a hexapod,
that can, unlike any other apparatus presently available in the marketplace or,
to Robotics' knowledge, under development, handle, manipulate and machine
materials of all sizes (from microchips to airplane parts) at high speed and
with great precision, potentially resulting in significant efficiencies and cost
savings to a wide array of manufacturers. This level of speed and precision is
made possible by the models' ability to solve the problems of moving and
positioning objects quickly, precisely and in the presence of considerable
stresses and forces often associated with the manufacturing environment, along
the six axes of three-dimensional space (i.e. X, Y, Z, Yaw, Pitch and Roll), and
the technology's expected ability to translate those solutions into physical
reality. In contrast, other technology available in the marketplace offers only
a multi-step sequential process which, management believes, is considerably less
efficient and effective than Robotics' technology, which operates in parallel,
and not in sequential steps.

Hexapod robots are made up of six legs (or actuators) that cause the movements
of a motion platform to occur with respect to an immobile base. For the motion
platform to move, these legs are mounted into twelve joints (ball joints in the
Company's current machines) that allow the six legs to change the distance
between the two platforms. The six legs are generally arranged into three
triangular pairs, with the top end of the three triangles, where the two legs
are mounted next to each other, attached at the movable surface, i.e. the
working part of the robot. If the two legs next to each other are not attached
at a single joint, but to two separate joints, then there are 12 joints in the
robot, with six joints (i.e. three pairs) at the top and six joints at the
bottom. The Company refers to this as a "12 node" hexapod. If, on the other
hand, the two legs next to each other are attached to a single joint (a ball
joint in all of the Company's current machines), then there would only be 9
nodes in this machine, with three at the top and six at the bottom. These joints
(both single and paired) are also called "gimbals." The Company licenses
patented technology that includes a device that allows the two top legs in each
pair on a nine-node robot to share a single joint, called a "triangular gimbal"
or a "bi-ball" joint. The movement of the robot's top surface can be
accomplished in one of two ways in the Company's machines: the length of the
legs can change (i.e. this type of leg is called an "actuator" and is used in
the "P" series); or the bottom joints of each leg can be mounted on a carriage
that rotates around a circular base, thereby changing the distance between the
bottom legs (used in the "R" series).

Robotics' two different platforms (or models) use a programmable robotic device
and the same proprietary software. The P Series, which is a conventional
parallel mechanism where each of the six servo driven actuators, or legs,
changes in length to create motion, has until recently come in a large and small
size referred to as the P 1000 and P 2000, respectively. The Company has
recently shipped a new, larger unit named the P 3000 for use in the water jet
cutting industry. The R Series, which has rigid fixed length legs and derives
its movement from the precise servo-driven actuation of the lower trucks around
a fixed rotary track, also comes in two sizes which are referred to as the R
1000 and R 2000.


<PAGE>

                                                            Form 10-KSB/A Page 3


The P Series device provides precise positioning combined with an ability to
provide superior stiffness compared to conventional robots which typically have
only one arm. The main uses, for customers doing either testing or simulation,
are to provide motion using the Company's base for either repetitive motion
under heavy loads or 6 degrees of freedom testing (i.e. X, Y, Z, Yaw, Pitch and
Roll movements are all being tested), where force measurement is required and an
experiment cannot allow for a platform that will deflect. Examples of these uses
would include, but not be limited to: force feedback and repetitive motion on
footwear; positioning of medical devices for testing; and failure testing of new
products for the defense and oil industry.


For industrial applications, the P Series provides 6 degrees of freedom of
motion with superior accuracy and an ability to deal with variety or
inconsistencies in the parts, the environment, or the setup of the pieces.
Examples of these would include: finding light bulbs that are in various
locations and positioning them in a housing according to the orientation of the
filaments prior to laser welding; compensating for variation in the size and
taper of a water jet cutting stream, allowing for greater accuracy in the
process; and moving a plastic part under a laser tool to remove flash after
molding.


The R Series provides precise positioning combined with an ability to provide
superior stiffness, as compared to conventional "one armed" robots. In addition,
the R Series also has one rotary axis with the ability to provide a much greater
range of motion around this axis. The R Series product has the theoretical
ability to spin infinitely around its "yaw" axis, depending on how it is built.
(The P Series provides more X, Y & Z motions in a similar-sized package than the
R Series. Therefore this is an application-specific choice when the customer is
deciding on which of these two robot types to purchase from the Company).

Much like the P Series, the R Series provides motion using its base for either
repetitive motion under heavy loads or 6 degrees of freedom testing where force
measurement is required (and experiments cannot allow for a platform that will
deflect). The ability to spin simulates, for example, the motion of an elbow or
knee, which requires motion in one axis. A company can develop an experiment
that will include an entire range of motion and still have the needed stiffness
to provide accurate results. Examples of these would include, but not be limited
to: force feedback and repetitive motion for prosthetics; and a motion base for
ride or flight simulation.


Robotics' continued success is heavily dependent upon proprietary technology.
Robotics relies on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and
trademark law, non-disclosure agreements and technical measures to protect its
rights pertaining to such products (Robotics licenses the technology covered by
a patent entitled Triangular Gimbal, Patent No: US 6,240,799 B1 and a patent
entitled Methods Employing a Rotary Track, Patent No: US 6,196,081 B1 for
machining and manufacturing, key components of its robots). Such protection may
not preclude competitors from developing products with similar features.
Robotics' success will depend in part on its ability to obtain and defend United
States and foreign patent protection for its products and to preserve its trade
secrets. In addition to seeking patent protection, Robotics does (and will
continue to) rely on contractual arrangements and trade secrets to protect
proprietary technology.

Robotics holds a non-exclusive license on the patents identified above. This
license is irrevocable, for so long as Robotics continues to honor its payment
obligations. The Company will continue to seek patent protection as new products
are developed. Although patenting of Robotics' core technology is important,
Robotics' largest technological advantage continues to be the interrelationship
of this hardware with Robotics' proprietary software, which management believes
is unique and revolutionary. For example, the large spherical joints provide the
Company's products a much stiffer platform than the other hexapods. The Company
is the first to employ these types of joints in this type of robotic technology.
Also, they allow the Company's products to very accurately define where the
exact pivotal locations of the nodes are in relation to the software's
understanding of those points. To management's knowledge, the Company's
competitors use gimbals or universal joints and those are not able to accurately
define the exact location of the nodes. Degree of accuracy is one of the most
critical selling points for the Company's type of robotics products.


Management believes that even if a competitor could also obtain a non-exclusive
license from the owner of Robotics' licensed technology, or otherwise lawfully
reproduce any of the Robotics' hardware devices, the absence of lawful access to
Robotics' proprietary software would make it extremely difficult or
prohibitively expensive to render any of such devices functional at levels of
performance comparable to those achieved by Robotics' devices. Management
believes that the hardware devices themselves are not readily susceptible to
duplication, and that the software is replete with subtleties that would be
difficult to develop independently. Management believes that most parties in the
market would conclude that it would be preferable simply to license Robotics'
technology on a consensual basis.

The software interface continues to evolve and yield refinements. Robotics has
chosen not to patent this interface, but to hold it as a "trade secret" (similar
to the formula for Coca-Cola). By patenting or copyrighting this product,
Robotics would reveal how it has accomplished many of its product advantages. By
protecting this information as a non-public trade secret, management believes
Robotics will more effectively create and preserve technical, financial and
timing barriers to replicating Robotics' technological innovations. Access to
the software source code is granted only to selected individuals. This code is
maintained in the corporate offices and off-site for redundancy. No source code
is made available to the Company's customers. Only executable application data
is distributed, with the exception of small amounts of user-accessible interface
modules. Copyright notices are included in the executables. This software is
co-owned with the Hexel Corporation, the corporation that previously developed
the robotic patents and licensed the robotic technology to Robotics.


<PAGE>


                                                            Form 10-KSB/A Page 4


Robotics is currently assembling its platforms at its Hampton, NH facilities.
These machines are manufactured and assembled with many standard parts and
components. In areas where specialty parts are required, Robotics identifies
three or more sources for creating these specialty parts. The purpose of three
sources is to avoid sole source urgent delivery issues, as well as to have the
standard purchasing practice of target pricing for best price from qualified
suppliers.

Robotics currently supports its machines with company-employed engineers. It is
anticipated that, over time, distributors will provide service support to
customers. Service will be performed on site and will include both hardware and
software assistance. As more products are sold, service will be outsourced to
existing firms that currently perform this service for today's machinery. As
Robotics licenses technology, it is anticipated that buyers would use their
existing service channels to maintain future products.


Research and development will continue to be a priority of Robotics, with the
aim of providing both standardized and custom advanced hardware and software
solutions to its customers in a wide variety of machine tooling, manufacturing
and other commercial settings (see Item 6, "Plan of Operations").


Markets and Business Strategy


The Company's Robotics subsidiary markets its products in a number of markets,
including the bio-medical, automotive assembly, defense, education and gas/oil
markets. In the biomedical market, a number of companies and universities in the
United States, Canada and Germany use the Company's P and R Series equipment to
manipulate and simulate cadaver or prosthetic body parts for motion studies and
force feed back analysis. In the automotive market, Osram Sylvania uses the
Company's P Series robots in conjunction with a vision system to position light
bulbs in a high speed laser welding operation for their automotive line. In the
defense market, BAE Systems and Astronics, Inc. use the Company's P and R Series
products for testing functionality during rapid motion on some of their defense
related products. In the oil and gas market, Deep Flex, Inc. uses the Company's
P Series product for repetitive motion testing on their underwater composite
piping products. Lastly, in the educational market, MIT uses the Company's P
Series product to provide motion to test some of their new control schemes for
damping vibration and motion on conventional robots during travel.

The percentage of the Company's revenues derived from each of the aforementioned
industries for the year ended March 31, 2006 is as follows: Biomedical - 37%;
Automotive - 0%; Defense - 30%; Oil and Gas - 33%; and Educational - 0%.

Robotics' primary marketing medium is its small, experienced sales staff.
Robotics competes against established products that employ older technology and,
therefore, cannot perform the range of movement which the Robotics' products can
perform. In the machine tool market, the Company competes against 3 axis and 5
axis machines, as well as conventional robotics, which each have their
disadvantages in relation to the Company's products. Serial Link 3 Axis machines
are made by numerous companies such as Haas Automation, Inc., Fadal Machining
Centers, LLC and many others. These are price competitive machines, but are
limited in their ability to move in relation to linear motions of X, Y & Z. The
rotational axes (Yaw, Pitch & Roll) are ignored. Along with limited travel,
these products are built for specialized applications like milling or other
machining tasks and, unlike the Robotics' unit, these three axis machines cannot
also do laser or water jet cutting with essentially the same machine. Also, due
to the nature of a serial link system, the customer's application has to be
placed very specifically in relation to the manufacturer's equipment. If these
serial link systems are used as the manufacturer has intended, then the customer
is able to efficiently and effectively utilize the manufacturer's equipment. If
the application is not conventional in the way intended by the manufacturer, it
is extremely costly and difficult for the customer to integrate their
application into the serial link equipment.

Serial Link 5 Axis products are also made by numerous companies such as Mori
Sieki, DMG and Cincinnati Milacron. These products are very expensive and,
although they provide for two of the rotations, they do not possess the ability
to provide a sixth degree of freedom. Some of these are configured to provide
Pitch and Yaw and some Pitch and Roll. All of theCompany's robotics devices
provide all three rotations-Yaw, Pitch and Roll. Similar to the 3 axis
offerings, these devices are very difficult to integrate or program into the
wide variety of tasks that are outside the scope of the specific applications
these devices were built to perform.

Conventional (anthropomorphic) robots are made by numerous companies such as
Fanuc Robotics, ABB, and Motoman, as well as many others. These products provide
a wide range of capabilities, are usually priced competitively but, for some of
the more capable offerings, are very expensive. However, this type of product is
not able to compete with the Company's product in terms of stiffness. This
limitation virtually eliminates its ability to compete in the manufacturing
applications that require accuracy and speed under a varying load. Along with
their deficiencies in stiffness and limited range of movement, these products
are usually intended to move a tool through a specified work space. A customer
who wishes to move their product or switch between moving the product and a tool
has a very difficult time utilizing this equipment.

These technological advantages give Robotics a significant competitive advantage
in the marketplace. In the future, Robotics may adopt a strategy of pursuing the
licensing of Robotics' core technology to strategic alliance partners. By
establishing such strategic relationships and leveraging the manufacturing and
marketing strengths of such strategic partners, Robotics hopes to gain rapid
worldwide recognition.


<PAGE>

                                                            Form 10-KSB/A Page 5


Robotics intends to focus upon particularly on the biomedical markets.
Management believes that there are no other products available in this market
that can effectively perform 6 axis simultaneous movement of an end attachment
or positioning platform with the same degree of reliability, repeatability and
accuracy. Ongoing projects in which Robotics is also currently involved include
further penetrating further the automotive assembly markets, as well as precise
positioning for defense related applications and contractors. Robotics will
continue to identify, develop and deliver other innovative and cost-efficient
machine hardware and software enhancements, adaptations and customized solutions
utilizing its proprietary hexapod technology.

Robotics has two major revenue sources: 1. assembling and selling two standard
products (the R and P Series machines) and; 2. creating custom "engineered to
order" products where customers are willing to pay for the engineering and
development costs. The engineered to order products are usually variations of
the R and P series devices, but can also be custom devices for a customer
interested in utilizing the Company's engineering expertise. The percentage of
revenue from the R and P Series machines for the year ended March 31, 2006 was
94%. The percentage of revenue from engineered to order products for that same
period was 6%.

Although Robotics has chosen to develop these two platforms as its initial
hexapod applications, its core technology allows the development of many
different types of hexapods. Robotics' technology is valuable in a wide variety
of industries. Management believes that the technology can be used to develop
very large machines capable of performing operations on structures such as
aircraft, or much smaller machines for use in such industries as silicon wafer
handling and testing. Due to the complex mathematical problems inherent in
developing the software to effectively operate a hexapod, and management's
belief that no other existing or aspiring hexapod or machine tool manufacturer
has achieved workable solutions to such mathematical problems and translated
such solutions into viable hexapod software, Robotics believes it has a lead on
its competition. With continued software development, it believes it can
maintain this lead.

While Robotics will most likely continue to manufacture and market biomedical
testing machines, Robotics also intends to adopt a strategy of pursuing the
licensing of its core technology to strategic alliance partners. These partners
may manufacture and distribute entire machines, or Robotics may elect to provide
only the core components. This is a strategy comparable to that of Intel
Corporation, whereby Intel manufactures the chips used in most IBM compatible
personal computers. Much like the "Intel Inside" concept, Robotics hopes to be
the provider of 6 degree of freedom robots to various applications. By
establishing such strategic relationships and leveraging the manufacturing and
marketing strengths of such strategic partners, Robotics hopes to gain rapid
worldwide recognition. At this time, Robotics has no strategic partnerships.


Customers


Through its Robotics subsidiary, the Company sold robots to three major
customers during the period from August 18, 2005, the first day of the Robotics
acquisition, through March 31, 2006. The sales to those customers accounted for
approximately 90% of the period's sales. The companies are in the oil and gas,
biomedical and defense industries. Those customers are: Deep flex, University of
Edmonton in Canada and BAE Systems. Manufacturers that use the Company's robots
are Osram-Sylvania (manufacture automotive light bulbs), Adidas and TSM (water
jet cutting in a machine shop environment).

The Company is not dependent upon these customers for future sales, in that it
is unlikely that any customer in these markets (i.e. primarily research and
development applications) will place a succession of repeat orders.
Occasionally, one of these types of customers will buy a second or third
machine, but significant additional purchases are unlikely. There are no robot
order contracts in production with any of these customers at this time.

In addition to the sale of robots, Robotics also receives revenue from the
service and warranty of existing systems. For the year ended March 31, 2006, the
Company derived 2 % of its revenue from service of existing systems and 98 % of
its revenue from sales of its robotic products.


Competition


Robotics' products compete against established products that employ older
technology. While Robotics is not aware of any products that incorporate
technology which is equivalent to that of Robotics' products, it is conceivable
that, in the future, other competitors could develop products based on different
technology that does not infringe on Robotics' patent or other rights, and that
may provide capabilities similar or superior to Robotics' products.


<PAGE>


                                                            Form 10-KSB/A Page 6



In the hexapod market, there are two companies producing products that compete
in similar markets to Robotics. One company from Japan, Fanuc Robotics, has a
product similar to Robotics' P 2000 product, called the F200IB, and a German
company named PI Instruments, produces a product similar to Robotics' P 1000
product. In regard to the F200IB, the Robotics' product is able to publish and
achieve accuracies and forces not offered by the Japanese manufacturer. In
regard to the German product, the Robotics' device offers a larger range of
motion in a similar work space. In both cases, Robotics is competitive from a
pricing standpoint and able to offer customization that competitors are unlikely
able to offer.

Along with hexapod manufacturers, Robotics frequently competes against
traditional robot manufacturers. Robotics offers a robot that is much more
accurate than these traditional robotic devices. Due to the mechanical
advantages of Robotics' equipment over these standard devices, it is unlikely
that they will be able to compete with the Robotics' devices in terms of
accuracy or stiffness.


Although the size of the hexapod robotic market is not known, it is likely that
PI Instruments and Fanuc Robotics are selling more robots than Robotics per
year. Robotics is likely third in this market. However, Robotics believes that
its product provides for capabilities previously not available from any hexapod
manufacturers in its targeted markets. The Company is seeking to introduce its
products to potential customers that are not aware that there is a product that
can provide a better solution. The Company's initial efforts are focused on
introducing the products to the various industry's' "Early Adapters". The
Company then intends to expand its service and sales capability to meet the
demands of the mainstream market. The three targets the Company is focused on
are as follows:


o    Custom or Flexible Manufacturing

     The Company provides an accurate and stiff motion platform that can be
     easily integrated to move a tool or a platform under a stationary tool.
     This product can be sized to fit a particular application and its accuracy,
     stiffness and cost can be scaled based on the application. By giving this
     type of flexibility to developers introducing new products, the Company can
     greatly decrease their time to market and the cost of integration.
     Currently this is a multi-billion dollar industry and the Company's product
     will allow for new players to enter the markets with competitive or
     improved products. An example of this would be the P 3000 Water Jet Cutter
     "Hex-a-Jet" that Robotics helped introduce early in 2006.

o    Biomedical Testing

     Previous to the Company's product, most of the testing in this market was
     either done on theoretical or mathematical models or using devices that,
     due to their lack of stiffness or range of motion, provided a less than
     realistic model for testing, rendering their results suspect. The Company's
     product allows researchers to perform real life tests to prove or model
     their experiments and achieve the verification needed to prove their
     theories or perform life cycle testing. Currently, the Company believes
     that this is one of the fastest growing markets for new equipment.

o    Simulation

     The Company offers a unique simulator in our R 2000 platform. This patented
     device allows the person to spin as well as experience acceleration and
     inertia in their virtual experience. Along with its ability to provide
     extra motion, the Company's product also provides a very low cost and
     compact platform for testing. Currently, many of the airline companies and
     military organizations employ simulators for training. Comparatively, the
     Company's device will be a very low cost, easy to integrate positioner for
     applications that require extensive training but don't warrant the cost of
     the multi-million dollar systems employed today.


Suppliers


Robotics relies on outside suppliers for substantially all of its parts,
components, and manufacturing supplies. While Robotics has deliberately followed
a policy of designing products with "off-the-shelf" components which are
available from a number of suppliers, there can be no assurance that Robotics'
existing suppliers will be able to meet all of Robotics' needs on terms
favorable or acceptable to Robotics. Currently, the Company does not have any
material contracts for the future purchase of parts or materials for inventory.

Robotics' products use a small amount of custom components that are critical to
the performance of its products. Next Move Controllers and MEI Controllers are
both plug in cards for PC's which allow the Robotics' robots to process the math
and control each of the 6 axes in a coordinated fashion. Two suppliers are used
and the Robotics' product is tested and developed for both. Another control
manufacturer (of which there are several) could be used, but the process for
porting to a new card is a significant effort. This is because each original
equipment manufacturer's motion control system has to be evaluated both in terms
of the availability of a very wide range of physical movements on the mechanical
side, as well as the software effort on the Company's part to add the third or
fourth control system to the Company's existing control software system. This
software effort also includes the job of building-in proprietary software
movements the Company's customers have typically come to expect in the Company's
systems. The Company is continuously evaluating alternative systems and the
Company is presently in the process of expanding robot controls from two
manufacturers to three. The Company expects this process to take approximately
six to nine months to complete. These cards are both supplied by Target
Electronic Supply Inc., a local electronics and electro-mechanical components
distributor.


<PAGE>

                                                            Form 10-KSB/A Page 7


E-Drive Actuators are provided by a manufacturer who Robotics has taught to make
the actuators for the precise P Series machines. To date, the best result
Robotics has achieved has been with their product. That does not preclude
Robotics from developing an additional supplier in the future, should that be
necessary. The E-Drive legs are provided by Automation Solutions Inc., a local
distributor of these types of equipment. Robotics has used two other leg
manufacturers for its less precise applications. The suppliers of these legs are
Tolo-Matic Inc. and Ultra-Motion LLC.

Lastly there is a manufacturer that produces the ring gear with an integrated
guide rail which is used for guiding the movable tracks on the R Series robot.
To date, Robotics has single sourced this activity because its source's standard
product fits the Robotics application perfectly. The name of this supplier is
the Bishop-Wisecarver Company. However if this product becomes scarce or too
expensive, Robotics could purchase the gear and the rail system separately from
a number of manufacturers.


Research and Development


Over the last two years, Robotics has spent approximately $50,000 on research
and development. Additionally, Robotics employs three engineers, whose time is
spent primarily on modifications requested by customers to Robotics' standard
products.

One area of research and development on which Robotics is focused is perfecting
the software and hardware capabilities of the R Series line for Robotics'
bio-medical opportunities. The main focus has been implementing a dual encoder
set-up on the motors to allow for precise motion under heavy and varied load,
coupled with a software interface that allows communication directly with Math
Lab and the Lab View products (which are standard in this industry).


On the P Series line, Robotics has focused on improving the joint retaining
rings and sockets for improved accuracy, manufacturability and ease of assembly.


Robotics has continued to enhance its software product and capabilities. The
concentration has been focused on addressing the applications which customers
are bringing to Robotics' attention. Along with this, Robotics has continued to
monitor, track and release versions for bug fixes, as well as customer specific
applications.


Currently, Robotics has produced a special R 2000 machine for Holo-Dek Gaming,
Inc. With this machine, Robotics is working on the perfection of a package that
will allow Holo-Dek Gaming, Inc. to integrate the simulator platform with
different video games for the amusement of its customers. Robotics hopes to
offer a similar product to companies working on flight training for small
aircraft.


There are other research and development projects that Robotics is
investigating, some resulting from customer requests.


Employees

The Company currently employs four people.

Government Regulations


The Company holds all licenses and permits necessary for the Company to operate
and meet applicable United States Environmental Protection Agency standards for
air and water discharge and Occupational Safety and Health Administration
standards. The Company does not do any manufacturing at its facility in Hampton,
New Hampshire (only assembly). The Company purchases all of the components for
its products from suppliers. Therefore, the Company has suffered no costs or
effects as a result of environmental regulations.


Other

The audit firm of Hansen, Barnett & Maxwell, the Company's Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm, has raised substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Recent Developments


The Company, through Robotics, has a relationship with a privately owned company
named Holo-Dek Gaming, Inc. ("Holo-Dek"). Ralph McKittrick, the CEO of Kingston,
is also the CEO of Holo-Dek (Ralph McKittrick is the largest shareholder,
directly or indirectly, of Kingston and the second largest shareholder of
Holo-Dek). Holo-Dek is a startup company that intends to open and operate a
number of theaters (one theater is currently open) for video gamers. Robotics
and Holo-Dek share office facilities, a number of employees and certain
expenses. The Flood Trust (the "Trust"), a shareholder of the Company which has
and continues to provide loans to the Company necessary to keep it in business
(which loans aggregated $62,549 at March 31, 2006), is also a significant
lender of working capital to Holo-Dek. The Company is considering acquiring
Holo-Dek. The Company views Holo-Dek as both an excellent prospect for
purchasing a large number of robotic machines from Robotics (to be used as
motion simulators) and as a viable entry vehicle into the multi-billion dollar
video game entertainment market (source-Electronic Software Association), as a
theater chain to be built exclusively for the use of video gamers.

<PAGE>

                                                            Form 10-KSB/A Page 8

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company owned no real property during the periods ended March 31, 2006 and
March 31, 2005.

Robotics has a lease obligation for office space and an assembly/research and
development facility in Hampton, New Hampshire. The lease was executed in 2002
and the term of the lease is five years, ending March 31, 2007.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In April 1988, a judgment was entered against the Company in the amount of
$353,883. The Company's current liabilities balances at March 31, 2006 and March
31, 2005 reflect the $353,883 principal, plus accrued interest of $638,123 and
$606,274, respectively. Subsequently, on April 6, 2006, the Company agreed to
settle this judgment. This settlement is discussed in Note 5.

There are no pending legal proceedings against the Company.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS


There were no matters submitted for shareholders' vote during the 2006 and 2005
fiscal years.


                                     PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

As of June 30, 2006, the majority and controlling shareholders of the Company
are the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


            Name                       Shares             Comments
            ----                       ------             --------
<S>                                      <C>              <C>
            Kingston Associates          105,902          Limited Partnership 60% controlled by Ralph McKittrick,
                                                          CEO of Kingston Systems
            Ralph McKittrick              32,453
            Thor Corporation           2,332,133          Thor Corporation is 100% controlled by Ralph McKittrick
            All others                 2,518,401
                                       ---------
                                       4,988,889
            Flood Trust                  612,251          See Note 2
            Total                      5,601,140
                                       =========
</TABLE>



On August 18, 2005, Kingston acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common
stock of Robotics for one dollar, as a result of which acquisition Robotics
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kingston. In addition, an Exchange Agreement
was signed between Kingston, Robotics and the Trust. The Trust, as payee, was
issued a promissory note (the "Note") by Robotics. The Trust acquired shares in
Kingston by assigning to Kingston, as consideration, its rights as payee under
the Note, in exchange for 612,251 newly issued shares of Kingston's common stock
(the shares were physically issued in June, 2006). Kingston, as the new payee
under the Note, then cancelled the Note, and any obligations of Robotics under
the Note. Kingston filed a Form 8-K regarding this transaction on August 19,
2005 (See Note 2).



Currently, the Company's common stock is not publicly traded.

The Company currently has no compensation plans or employee benefit plans.

ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS

General

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this
report. In addition, at March 31, 2006, the Company's auditors, Hansen, Barnett
& Maxwell, the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, raised
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. As
previously mentioned, the Company was inactive from 1988 until its recent
acquisition of Robotics in August, 2005.

The Company's fiscal year is from April 1 through March 31.

<PAGE>

                                                            Form 10-KSB/A Page 9

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of
operations is based upon Kingston's consolidated financial statements, which
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements
requires the use of estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities and expenses. The Company evaluates its estimates on an ongoing
basis, including estimates for income tax assets and liabilities and the
impairment of the value of investments. The Company bases its estimates on
historical experience and on actual information and assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances at that time. Actual results
may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The
Company believes that the following critical accounting policies affect its more
significant estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial
statements:


o     Accounting for Income Taxes - The Company records a full valuation
      allowance against the deferred tax benefit for net operating losses
      ("NOL") generated, since in management's opinion, the net operating losses
      do not meet the more likely than not criteria for future realization.

o     Impairment of Investments - The Company reviews estimates of the value of
      its investments each reporting period and will record an impairment loss
      to the extent that management believes that there has been an impairment
      to the carrying value.

o     Inventory Valuation - Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in,
      first-out) or market. Market value is estimated based upon assumptions
      made about future demand and market conditions. If the Company determines
      that the actual market value differs from the carrying value of the
      inventory, the Company will make an adjustment to reduce the value of the
      inventory.


Overview

Management's plan of operations for the next twelve months is to seek to expand
Robotics' business, increasing revenue volume and improving operating margins,
in order to reduce, and eventually eliminate, its historical net losses. There
are current activities that are critical to successfully achieving that plan.
The Company is working to sell a new robot application, consisting of a
hexapod-mounted water jet cutter, into markets that have been previously
untapped for robot sales. Another new product in production is a simulator,
which can be used in the video game theater business. This is an application
where the Company has identified an opportunity to become a significant supplier
of robots to Holo-Dek, which will use those robots if they succeed in
building-out their video gaming centers. The Company has been considering
acquiring Holo-Dek as part of its business expansion plan.

The Company is also evaluating its cost structure in order to minimize cost of
sales for each robot sale. A good portion of that cost reduction is expected to
come from cost savings related to volume purchases of fabrications and purchased
parts. An additional component of cost reduction may result from research and
development, as the Company continues to focus on standardization, in order to
reduce or eliminate non-recurring engineering and design costs, and to develop
new applications and additional markets for existing robot designs.

The Company is currently dependent upon working capital loans that originate
primarily from the Flood Trust through its investments and loans to Holo-Dek
which, in turn, are provided to the Company to fund research and development and
to offset the Company's operating income deficit. Although the Trust has proven
to be a reliable source of funds in the past, there is no guarantee that the
Trust will continue to provide funding, or that other sources will be available
during the next twelve months.


Plan of Operations


As discussed in Item 1 and below in the Management's Discussion and Analysis,
Kingston was a dormant company from 1988 until, in August of 2005, Kingston
acquired Robotics in an attempt to revive itself (see Note 2). Robotics'
business, although not yet profitable or cash flow self-sufficient, presents
opportunities for expansion. Robotics' robot products are unique in the industry
and more technologically advanced than competitor products. Additionally,
Robotics has a relationship with Holo-Dek, a startup gaming business, which
could provide another market for Robotics' products (see Item 1, "Recent
Developments"). The Company is considering acquiring Holo-Dek. The Company views
Holo-Dek as both an excellent prospect for purchasing a large number of robotic
machines from Robotics (to be used as motion simulators) and as a viable entry
vehicle into the multi-billion dollar video game entertainment market
(source-Electronic Software Association), as a theater chain to be built
exclusively for the use of video gamers.

Ongoing research and development will be a priority of the Company, with the aim
of providing both standardized and custom advanced hardware and software
solutions to its customers in a wide variety of machine tooling, manufacturing
and other commercial settings. Currently the Company is planning three different
arenas for research and development efforts. First, the Company will continue to
work on the software algorithms to improve upon the actuators purchased from
manufacturing partners. This will allow the Company's machines to achieve
greater accuracy and allow the Company to purchase lower cost components from a
larger group of vendors. Second, the Company is planning to use its R Series
platform as a simulator for both the small aircraft flight industry, as well as
an interactive ride for video game entertainment. The research and development
effort will seek to create the tools necessary for game developers and flight
schools to integrate their current or future software products with the
Company's simulator. Third, the Company plans to develop a standard, in-house
actuator that can be used for low cost applications.


<PAGE>

                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 10


The Company's head of sales is focused on selling robots into a number of
industries. In the Company's existing markets, such as universities (using the
Company's robots for bio-medical research) and in the automotive industry (using
the Company's robots for assembly), the Company is approaching existing
customers for additional orders and exploring opportunities to sell products to
other such universities and automotive companies. The Company's P 3000 Water-Jet
Cutter is a new product, (the water jet cutter is an accurate rapid device that,
when coupled with the Company's robot, can perform multi axis cutting, which is
currently rare in the industry and quite expensive), being direct-marketed at
this time primarily to the automotive, heavy equipment, and defense industries.
Robotics has produced a special R 2000 machine for Holo-Dek Gaming. With this
machine, Robotics is working on the perfection of a package that will allow
Holo-Dek to integrate its robotic simulator platform with different video games
for amusement and educational training. Robotics also intends to pursue channel
sales through machine tool integrators and distributors.

The Company currently uses its head of sales, its web site and business contacts
to market its products. The Company plans to develop more extensive use of print
advertising and display its products at numerous industry tradeshows and
conferences once improved sales provides additional funding.

In regards to the Company's Robotics business, given the current sales volumes,
the Company does not expect to acquire or dispose of any significant amount of
capital assets, nor does it expect to significantly expand or contract its
current number of employees. The Company does anticipate that if a number of the
above noted opportunities are realized, it will have to expand resources. Until
sales improve, the Company is reliant upon working capital advances from
Holo-Dek (through the Flood Trust's investments in Holo-Dek) to maintain its
liquidity and continue operations. The Company will utilize accounts receivable
funding to expand its ability to finance purchase orders.


The Company's business plans call for sales in the range of $2,000,000 during
the twelve month period ending March 31, 2007. The costs of goods sold
associated with these orders is estimated to be in the range of $1,200,000. The
Company does not know that the orders will ever be realized. The Company may
also find that the cost of materials and services to produce the future orders
envisioned in the plan will exceed the estimates now in the plan. As a result of
both of these uncertainties, the estimated future sales could be lower than
planned and the estimated future costs higher than planned, or both - perhaps by
a significant amount.


Although there has been a stable funding base for Robotics through the Trust and
other sources of capital, along with revenue from the sales of its robots,
management believes that it is necessary to obtain additional capital
investment, through either the public or private markets, in order to allow the
Company to expand its robotics business, invest in strategic opportunities,
achieve overall profitability and provide cash flow self-sufficiency. Management
is striving to obtain additional funding, but there can be no assurance that
management will succeed in a timely fashion. If additional funding is not
obtained, the Company may need to curtail operations.

Results of Operations

Summary

Kingston was incorporated in 1983 and re-incorporated in Delaware in 1987. The
Company operated a proprietary recovery system that reclaimed paper pulp and
non-biodegradable polyethylene from packaging material scrap. The Company sold
the recovered fiber as substitute for virgin wood pulp and the reclaimed
polyethylene for use in injection molding. The Company experienced some
difficult and turbulent periods and subsequently made its last SEC filing of a
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 1988. The Company had been inactive since
that date, with the exception of the expenses accrued for professional services
and interest on a judgment payable. Subsequent to that date, the Company has
made an acquisition, which is discussed in detail in Note 2. On August 18, 2005,
Kingston acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Robotics.
Thus, Robotics became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kingston.

The Year Ended March 31, 2006 as compared to the year ended March 31, 2005

Revenues for the 2006 fiscal year were $630,575, reflecting solely the revenues
of Robotics. During the period, the Company completed three major projects and
recognized $566,517 in sales for those projects. The Company had an additional
$64,058 in revenues from repairs/maintenance, frame sales and service contract
revenue amortization. There was no sales activity in the prior year period, as
the acquisition of Robotics had not yet occurred.

The Company categorizes all pre-shipment progress payments from the customers on
the balance sheet as "deferred revenue" (combined with service contract revenue
amortization on the Company's balance sheet). Upon shipment of the robot, the
Company releases those liabilities to revenue, along with the related cost of
sales. Should a completed robot have its shipment temporarily delayed, as
authorized by the customer (for example, the customer's facility may not yet be
prepared to install the robot), the Company will recognize the robot's revenue
and cost of sales at time of completion of the robot. As of March 31, 2006, that
liability was $161,563 and is expected to be recognized as revenue during the
Company's 2007 fiscal year.

<PAGE>

                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 11

Cost of sales was $389,759 for the 2006 fiscal year, which reflects costs
related to the Robotics sales orders shipped in that period, of which $317,102
was for materials used in the production of the robots. The remainder was
primarily labor used to produce the robots. There was no activity in the prior
year.


The Company capitalizes direct material, direct labor and overhead costs that
apply to Robotics' customer orders in progress. That inventory is reclassified
to cost of sales at the time the product is completed or shipped. As of March
31, 2006, the Company's inventory was $291,391, which reflects $263,015 of
customer order related inventory. That customer order related inventory is
expected to be recognized as cost of sales in the Company's 2007 fiscal year.

Selling expenses for the 2006 fiscal year reflect solely the expenses of
Robotics. There was no activity in the prior year period. The Company's expense
was $23,797, which was comprised primarily of salaries related to the selling of
Robotics' products.


General and administrative expenses were $186,465 in the 2006 fiscal year. That
amount consisted of engineering related expenses of $82,046, $32,289 of other
payroll related expenses, rent and utility expenses of $21,803 and insurance
expenses of $11,136. The remaining expenses of $39,191 were for professional
services, travel, depreciation and other costs. For the 2005 fiscal year,
general and administrative expenses were $50,000, which reflects professional
services for Kingston.


Research and development expenses were $50,608 for the 2006 fiscal year. Those
costs were primarily engineering salary costs related to the continuing
development of Robotics' products. There was no corresponding expense in 2005
fiscal year.


During the 2006 fiscal year, the Company had a goodwill impairment charge of
$1,787,431 related to the purchase of Robotics by the Company. That transaction
is discussed in detail in Note 2.


Interest expense for the 2006 fiscal year was $36,911, which reflects interest
related to the judgment payable and, to a lesser degree, the loan payable,
related party (to George Coupe), both reflected in the Company's March 31, 2006
balance sheet. Interest expense for the prior year period was $31,849, related
to the judgment payable.

The Company's loss for the 2006 fiscal year was $1,844,396 (primarily due to the
expense of $1,787,431 for the impairment of goodwill) and the Company's loss for
the 2005 fiscal year was $81,849 (the loss resulted from professional services
for the Company, as it attempted to revive itself, along with accrued interest
on the judgment payable), which resulted in an earnings per share loss of $0.34
and $0.02 in the 2006 and 2005 fiscal years, respectively.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

The cash flows during fiscal 2006 reflect the acquisition of the assets and
liabilities of Robotics (see Note 2). On an ongoing basis, the Company's primary
needs for liquidity and capital resources are for the funding of salaries and
other administrative expenses related to the management of the Company, for
payment of the cost of products sold and inventory (if these expenditures are
not covered by customer pre-shipment deposits) and, to a lesser degree, for
research and development. As discussed previously, the Company has had no
activity from 1988 through August 18, 2005. At that time, Kingston acquired 100%
of the issued and outstanding common stock of Robotics. Thus, Robotics became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Kingston. This transaction has been accounted for in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141,
"Business Combinations" using the purchase method of accounting. The fair value
of net assets acquired was $49,321, which was offset by equity issued in lieu of
cash of $1,836,752, resulting in the recording of the excess of cost over the
fair value of acquired net assets (goodwill) of $1,787,431. Subsequent to the
acquisition, the Company immediately evaluated the goodwill for impairment and
determined that it was impaired. The total amount of goodwill was charged to the
Company's statements of operations


During fiscal 2006, net cash used by operations was $292,444, compared with $0
in the prior year period. This use of funds was primarily due to increases in
inventory and accounts receivable, along with a reduction in deferred revenue
and accruals, partially offset by cash from accounts payable. With the exception
of the change in accruals, these cash flows are consistent with the Company's
fulfillment of three significant orders during the year, and the purchase of
inventory for current projects. The reduction in accruals was primarily related
to payments for professional services. In the prior year period, the net loss
related to accrued interest for the judgment payable and professional services
accruals was offset by the balance sheet impact of those entries.


Net cash from investing activities was $161,402 for the 2006 fiscal year,
compared with no activity for the prior year period. The source of funds in
fiscal 2006 reflects the repayment of a receivable from Holo-Dek and cash
acquired in the Robotics acquisition, partially offset by an increase in the
software development asset.

<PAGE>

                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 12


Cash provided by financing activities was $150,764 for fiscal 2006, compared
with $0 for fiscal 2005. The source of cash in 2006 was primarily from working
capital loans from Holo-Dek. Until October 31, 2004, the Trust invested directly
into Robotics, with the funding being in the form of debt that was converted to
stock. The debt and accumulated interest totaled $1,836,752 as of October 31,
2004. As of October 31, 2004, the accrual of interest on the debt was
temporarily delayed until October 31, 2005, at which time interest accrued at
the rate of 8% per year. Interest accrued from October 31, 2005 until June,
2006, when the debt was converted to stock, which was forgiven by the Trust.
After October 31, 2004, the Trust invested into Holo-Dek which in turn funded
Robotics on an as needed basis, through the working capital advance account,
which loans aggregated $62,549 at March 31, 2006, (The terms of those advances
are: it is a demand note payable April 1, 2007. Subsequent to that date, the
note will bear an annual interest rate of 8.0%) and a short-term $100,000 loan
from the Trust (this loan was made in March of 2006 and is payable on demand on
or after March 17, 2007, at the discretion of the Trust. The loan bears an
annual interest rate of 8.0%). These relationships are discussed in Item 1.

The Company's cash and cash equivalents of $19,722 as of March 31, 2006, along
with potential future sales revenue, is not presently sufficient to support
current levels of operations for the next twelve months and it is therefore
necessary for the Company to continue to seek additional financing. Such
financing has been obtained in the past from the Trust and other sources of
capital, along with the sale of the Company's robots. In addition, the Company
is continuing to pursue its interests in Holo-Dek, along with a focus on
increasing revenue through an increased level of sales of robotic products. As
mentioned previously, the Company is actively pursuing additional sources of
funding,


Given the aforementioned discussion, there is no assurance that the level of
funding ultimately received by the Company will be sufficient to sustain the
Company's future operations. Should that occur, the Company may need to curtail
its operations.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements


As of March 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had no off balance sheet arrangements
with any parties.


Legal Contingencies

The Company may be subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims, including
proceedings under laws and government regulations related to the environment,
labor, product liability and other matters. The Company is required to assess
the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters, as well as
potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserves
required, if any, for these contingencies is based on a careful analysis of each
individual issue with the assistance of outside legal counsel. The required
reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or
changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with
these matters. At March 31, 2006 there are no outstanding legal proceedings, nor
are there any reserves established.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS
No. 123 (revised 2004),"Share-Based Payment," which is an amendment to SFAS No.
123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" and supersedes Accounting
Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees." This new standard eliminates the ability to account for share-based
compensation transactions using APB No. 25 and requires such transactions to be
accounted for using a fair-valued-based method, with the resulting cost
recognized in the Company's consolidated financial statements. This new standard
is effective for annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company has
not awarded or granted any share-based compensation to date and, therefore, the
adoption of this standard is not expected to have any impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position or results of operations until such time as
share-based compensation is granted.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchange of Non-monetary
Assets." SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29, "Accounting for Non-monetary
Transactions," to eliminate the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar
productive assets. The Company is required to apply this statement to
non-monetary exchanges after December 31, 2005. The adoption of this standard
has not had a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial
statements.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections" which replaces APB Opinions No. 20 "Accounting Changes" and SFAS
No. 3 "Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements -- An
Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28." SFAS No. 154 provides guidance on the
accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It
establishes retrospective application, or the earliest practicable date, as the
required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and restatement
with respect to the reporting of a correction of an error. SFAS No. 154 is
effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005.

In June 2005, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") reached a consensus
on Issue No. 05-6, "Determining the Amortization Period for Leasehold
Improvements." The guidance requires that leasehold improvements acquired in a
business combination or purchased subsequent to the inception of a lease be
amortized over the lesser of the useful life of the assets or a term that
includes renewals that are reasonably assured at the date of the business
combination or purchase. The guidance is effective for periods beginning after
June 29, 2005. The adoption of EITF No. 05-6 is not expected to have a material
impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

<PAGE>

                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 13


In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, which is an amendment of SFAS
Nos. 133 and 140. This statement; a) permits fair value remeasurement for any
hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise
would require bifurcation, b) clarifies which interest-only strip and
principal-only strip are not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133, c)
establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets
to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid
financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation,
d) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are
not embedded derivatives, e) amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on
a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial
instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative
financial instrument. This statement is effective for financial statements for
fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. Earlier adoption of this
statement is permitted as of the beginning of an entity's fiscal year, provided
the entity has not yet issued any financial statements for that fiscal year. The
adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company's consolidated financial statements.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, which amends SFAS No. 140. This
statement establishes, among other things, the accounting for all separately
recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. This statement amends
SFAS No. 140 to require that all separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. This
statement permits, but does not require, the subsequent measurement of
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value.
An entity that uses derivative instruments to mitigate the risks inherent in
servicing assets and servicing liabilities is required to account for those
derivative instruments at fair value. Under this statement, an entity can elect
subsequent fair value measurement to account for its separately recognized
servicing assets and servicing liabilities. By electing that option, an entity
may simplify its accounting because this statement permits income statement
recognition of the potential offsetting changes in fair value of those servicing
assets and servicing liabilities and derivative instruments in the same
accounting period. This statement is effective for financial statements for
fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. Earlier adoption of this
statement is permitted as of the beginning of an entity's fiscal year, provided
the entity has not yet issued any financial statements for that fiscal year.
Management believes that adoption of this standard will not have a material
impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.


Forward Looking Statements


The Company is including the following cautionary statement in this Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB/A. Forward-looking statements include statements
concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance
and underlying assumptions and other statements which are other than statements
of historical facts. Certain statements contained herein are forward-looking
statements and accordingly involve risks and uncertainties which could cause
actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in the
forward-looking statements. The Company's expectations, beliefs and projections
are expressed in good faith and are believed by the Company to have a reasonable
basis, including without limitation, management's examination of historical
operating trends, data contained in the Company's records and other data
available from third parties, but there can be no assurance that management's
expectation, beliefs or projections will result or be achieved or accomplished.
In addition to other factors and matters discussed elsewhere herein, the
following are important factors that, in the view of the Company, could cause
actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking
statements: the Company's losses from period to period; the Company's current
dependence on a limited number of key suppliers and investors; the Company's
ability to successfully market and sell its products in view of changing trends,
acceptance of products and other factors affecting market conditions;
technological advances by the Company's competitors; capital needs to fund
operations and development programs; delays in the manufacture of new and
existing products by the Company or third party contractors; the loss of any key
employees; the outcome of any litigations; changes in governmental regulations;
and availability of capital on terms satisfactory to the Company. The Company
disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances after the date hereof.


ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Financial Statements are included after the Exhibit Index.

                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.


                                      INDEX
                                                                    Page Number
                                                                      ------
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm                21
 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
 March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005                                      22
 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
 March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005                                      23
 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
 for the years ended March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005                  24
 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
 March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005                                      25
 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements                       26-34


<PAGE>

                                                              Form 10KSB Page 14

ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the Company's reports filed under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), is recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported within the required time periods, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding disclosure.


As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, the Company has completed an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness and the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls
and procedures as of March 31, 2006. Based upon this evaluation and as a result
of the deficiencies discussed below, management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer, have concluded that the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2006.
Management nevertheless has concluded that the consolidated financial statements
included in this Form 10-KSB/A present fairly, in all material respects, the
results of the Company's operations and its financial position for the periods
presented, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

The deficiencies in the Company's internal control over financial reporting
related to the failure to measure or disclose the reasons for the zero provision
for income taxes, certain debt disclosures and certain cash flow transactions in
the financial statements initially prepared by the Company. All three errors
were detected during the independent audit process and corrected before they
were included in the financial statements in this Form 10-KSB/A.

         (1) The Provision for Income Taxes.

Footnote 8 to the financial statements calculates an income tax provision of
zero. The table identifies that there are tax loss carry-forwards caused by
losses dating back between 15 and 20 years, and the deferred tax consequences of
those carry forwards if the Company were to be profitable enough in the coming
years to utilize those loss carry-forwards. The table then states that, since it
is not certain that the Company will be profitable in the future, the tax
provision is zero (when the valuation allowance based on the uncertainty of
future profits is applied). The Company believes that the proper assessment of
how these tax laws might impact the Company's income tax expense provision
requires a significant level of up-to-date expertise in the constantly changing
tax regulations and court case decisions.

The deficiencies that resulted in the failure properly to disclose the provision
for income taxes in the financial statement footnote presented by the Company to
the auditors were related to the limited expertise of the Company's accounting
staff in corporate income tax matters and a failure of in-house staff to avail
themselves of outside experts for tax expense reporting assistance. These
outside experts would have been required to properly measure the impact of the
tax laws and regulations on the Company's provision for these tax expenses prior
to submitting the Company's financials to outside CPA's for review and
subsequent release to the investing public. However, the significance of this
deficiency should, in the opinion of management, be tempered by the fact that,
prior to the time this deficiency was brought to the attention of management,
there was the assessment by management that the tax provision of zero would be
accurate. While management agreed that, once it had been brought to their
attention, this tax provision internal control deficiency did exist at the time
of the audit, it is also important to note that the impact of this deficiency on
the Income statement and balance sheet for the year being audited was, in the
end, zero. Although the impact in this instance was immaterial, there still is
the strong desire by management to correct the lack of expertise in tax matters
in-house by developing these skills inside the Company as the Company's growth
objectives are realized and, in the interim, to use outside experts until the
in-house expertise is achieved.

         (2) Leasing Debt Disclosures.

The total related party lease obligations and assets listed in the balance sheet
amount to $52,136 at March 31, 2006. These refer to certain leases where
Robotics had obtained lease financing to fund the purchase of assets to be used
exclusively by Holo-Dek. When these transactions were first recorded, Holo-Dek
entered them into their books as assets off-set by lease liabilities, and no
entries for the lease liabilities were made on the books of Robotics at the time
the assets were first acquired by Holo-Dek, as they should have been. What
should have been recorded on the books of Robotics (prior to submission of these
books to the outside CPA audit firm) was the liability for the equipment to the
leasing Company and an inter-company receivable of an equal and off-setting
asset amount due Robotics from Holo-Dek.

The deficiencies that resulted in the failure to properly measure and disclose
the liability of Robotics to the leasing companies was an oversight by
management that should have been detected and corrected in the review process.
Although the amount of the deficiency was immaterial, management considers the
exclusion of all related-party leasing balances a discrepancy worthy of
immediate correction procedurally so that all of these transactions are recorded
appropriately on the books of each of the related parties. The accounting staff
has been trained to be more alert to properly recording all inter-company
transactions on the books of both companies.


<PAGE>
                                                            Form 10KSB/A Page 15


         (3) Cash Flow Transactions.

The Statement of Cash Flows in this Form 10-KSB/A correctly lists the $38,988
that was the cash on hand at Robotics on August 18, 2005, the date when Kingston
acquired Robotics, as a cash flow from investing activities. In the draft cash
flow report presented by the Company to the auditors, this item was incorrectly
disclosed as "cash on hand - beginning." The amount and nature of this item was
separately disclosed in both instances, it was just the characterization of the
item by the Company's accountants that was wrong. The mischaracterization was an
immaterial error in cash flow and, had it not been detected, it would have had
no impact on the balance sheet and income statement. Nevertheless, management
desires to take action to correct this discrepancy in reporting so that when
acquisitions take place in the future, the reports provided by the Company to
the auditors to review will be perfect and that there will be a total lack of
deficiencies to be detected by the Company's outside CPA firm. Improved training
of the accounting staff in reporting cash flows is expected to eliminate
problems of this nature in the future. Another corrective action taken by the
Company was the hiring of a CPA on September 25, 2006 to replace the previous
accounting manager - an action that is expected to improve the Company's
internal controls in all accounting areas.


Based on the matters identified above, the Company's Chief Executive
Officer/Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures were not effective. These deficiencies have been
disclosed to the Company's Board of Directors.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

As noted above, the Company has improved its internal control over financial
reporting and has resolved these deficiencies through improved supervision and
training of the accounting staff. The Company's management and directors will
continue to work with its auditors and outside advisors to ensure that the
Company's controls and procedures are adequate and effective.

Section 404 Assessment. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires
management's annual review and evaluation of the Company's internal controls,
and an attestation of the effectiveness of these controls by the Company's
independent registered public accountants, beginning with the Company's Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ending on March 31, 2008. The Company plans to
dedicate significant resources, including management time and effort, in
connection with the Company's Section 404 assessment. The evaluation of the
Company's internal controls will be conducted under the direction of its senior
management. The Company will continue to work to improve its controls and
procedures, and to educate and train its employees on the Company's existing
controls and procedures, in connection with the Company's efforts to maintain an
effective controls infrastructure at the Company.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls. A system of controls, however well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance
that the system will meet its objectives. The design of a control system is
based, in part, upon the benefits of the control system relative to its costs.
Control systems can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. In
addition, over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon
assumptions about the likelihood of future events.

<PAGE>


                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 16


                                    PART III

ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE
WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.

Directors and Executive Officers

As of June 30, 2006, the Directors and executive officers of the Company are
presented below.

       NAME                                 AGE    TITLE

       Ralph E. McKittrick                  56     Chairman, CEO, and Director

       George J. Coupe                      65     Chief Financial Officer

       James W. Byrne                       49     Director


The principal occupations and brief summary of the background of each Director
and executive officer of Kingston during the past five years is as follows:


Ralph E. McKittrick - Founder/CEO, and Chairman of the Board of Directors since
January 1987


Ralph McKittrick is the founder, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company. His term of office as a director of Kingston expires on
August 18, 2010. In 2004, he co-founded Holo-Dek and he has been the CEO of
Holo-Dek since its founding. Before founding Holo-Dek, Mr. McKittrick co-founded
Cargo Force, Inc. in 2003 and he has also been the CEO of Cargo Force since its
founding. Cargo Force is a commercial airlift/airfreight startup company whose
mission is to support US industry, especially the heavy manufacturers. Before
founding Cargo Force, Mr. McKittrick was a consultant to CNC Systems, Inc. from
December 15, 1999 to November 15, 2002, where he helped turn around this machine
tool distributor in Maine.

George J. Coupe - Chief Financial Officer since March 2006

George Coupe is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. His term of office
as a director of Kingston expires on 8/18/07. In 2004, he co-founded Holo-Dek
and has been the President of Holo-Dek since its founding. Mr. Coupe founded
Robotics in 2002 and he has also been the President of Robotics since its
founding. Prior to founding Robotics, and beginning with his departure from Ford
Finance Staff in 1975, Mr. Coupe was engaged in turning around companies in
financial difficulty, typically either as the CFO or as a financial control
consultant. Mr. Coupe also was one of the founders at two startup companies
during this period. In May of 2001, Mr. Coupe was hired by Renaissance Design,
Inc., a company in the contract engineering and manufacturing industry ("RDI").
Mr. Coupe was hired by RDI because of his reputation for saving companies and
because RDI was contemplating bankruptcy. Mr. Coupe was unable to save RDI and
they ceased operations on February 8, 2002. A few months later RDI filed for
bankruptcy. Prior to joining Renaissance Design, Inc., Mr. Coupe was a financial
consultant (from to March 15, 2000 to May 15, 2001) and before that he was the
CFO of Northland Tool, Inc., (from January 1, 1995 to March 15, 2000) a spindle
repair company.

James W. Byrne - Director since May 1989

Mr. Byrne is a member of the Company's Board of Directors and is the operations
manager for Holo-Dek Gaming, Inc., a position he has held since March 31, 2004.
His term of office as a director of Kingston expires on August 18, 2007. Prior
to joining the Company and Holo-Dek, Mr. Byrne spent 27 months renovating his
18th century home n New Hampshire. Prior to this he was the Director of
Engineering for Advanced Digital Internet ("ADI") from July 17, 1998 to August
1, 2002. ADI provided internet service to high-end multi-dwelling units in
Manhattan. Mr. Byrne's specialty was designing the infrastructure and overseeing
the installation of each system.

There are no significant (critical) employees of the Company, other than the
directors and officers noted above.


Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Company does not currently have an independent Board of Directors. The
Company intends to establish an independent Board, along with an Audit and
Compensation Committee, in its 2006-2007 fiscal year.

<PAGE>

                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 17

Compensation of Directors

Directors who are employees of the Company are not paid any other fees or
additional compensation for services as members of the Company's Board of
Directors or any committee thereof.

Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance


Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
directors, executive officers and any person who owns more than 10% of the
Company's common stock (the "Reporting Persons") to file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of
the Company's common stock. Under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, the
Company receives copies of all Section 16(a) forms that these Reporting Persons
file. The Company has determined that all stockholders required to file are in
compliance with Section 16(a).

Code of Ethics


The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics within the meaning of Item 406(b) of
Regulation S-B. This Code of Ethics applies to the Company's principal executive
officer, the Company's principal financial officer and principal accounting
officer, as well as all other employees, and is incorporated by reference. If
the Company makes substantive amendments to this Code of Ethics or grants any
waiver, including any implicit waiver, the Company will disclose the nature of
such amendment or waiver on the Company's website or in a report on Form 8-K
within five days of such amendment or waiver.

The Company's code of ethics is posted on its website www.kingstonsystems.com.

ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the aggregate cash compensation paid by the
Company to: (i) its Chief Executive Officer, Chairman; and (ii) its most highly
compensated officers whose cash compensation exceeded $100,000 for services
performed during the year ended March 31, 2006.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                          LONG TERM COMPENSATION
                                                                         -------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                 Awards
                                          ANNUAL COMPENSATION            ------------------------
                                -------------------------------------    Restricted   Securities              Payouts
                                                         Other Annual      Stock      Underlying    -----------------------------
Name and Principal                                       Compensation     Award(s)      Options        LTIP        All Other
Position              Year      Salary ($)     Bonus ($)     ($)             ($)        SARs(#)     Payouts ($)  Compensation ($)
------------------    ----      ----------     --------- ------------     --------      -------     -----------  ----------------
<S>                   <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Ralph McKittrick,     2006          0             0             0             0             0             0             0
CEO                   2005          0             0             0             0             0             0             0
                      2004          0             0             0             0             0             0             0
</TABLE>


The Company does not have any employment agreements.


The Company does not have any annuity, retirement, pension or deferred
compensation plan or other arrangements under which an executive officer is
entitled to participate without similar participation by other employees.

The Company does not currently have a stock option plan.

ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

As of June 30, 2006, there were 5,601,140 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding.

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 31, 2006,
regarding each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more
than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, each director, and named
executive officer of the Company, and all officers and directors as a group:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                              Amount and Nature
                                                                              of Beneficial
                                                                              Ownership of              Percentage of
      Name/Address of Beneficial                Position with                 Common Stock              Securities (1)
      Owner*                                       Company                       (1)
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>                            <C>                           <C>
      Ralph E. McKittrick (2)                   Chairman, CEO                  2,470,488                     44.1 %
      James W. Byrne                            Director                       0                             0.0%
      George J. Coupe                           Chief Financial Officer        0                             0.0%
      Flood Trust (3)                           N/A                            612,251                       10.9%
      All executive officers and Directors as a                                2,470,488                     44.1%
      group (3 people)
</TABLE>


<PAGE>



                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 18


* Address of all holders is c/o Kingston Systems, Inc., 8 Merrill Industrial
Drive, Unit 12, Hampton, NH 03842.


(1) Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a person is
deemed to "beneficially own" shares of common stock over which the person has or
shares investment or voting power, or has the right to acquire such power within
60 days. The percentage of common stock owned is calculated based on the number
of shares of common stock outstanding, plus, in the case of each person, the
number of shares of common stock issuable only to such person upon the exercise
of options or warrants and the conversion of convertible debt securities.
(2) The ownership noted is comprised of the following: Thor Corporation owns
2,332,133 shares of common stock and is 100% controlled by Ralph McKittrick, CEO
of Kingston; Kingston Associates owns 105,902 shares of common stock and is a
Limited Partnership, 60% controlled by Ralph McKittrick and; Ralph McKittrick
owns 32,453 shares of common stock.


(3) Mr. Larry Flood has sole control over the shares held by the Flood Trust.
The 612,251 shares were physically issued in June, 2006.

ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS


As of March 31, 2006, the Company was involved in the following related party
transactions:

o     The Company has certain credit card advances from George Coupe, President
      of Robotics, in the amount of $80,263. These advances are for the
      financing of operations and certain capital asset purchases. These
      advances consist of the balances on personal credit cards of George Coupe
      that were and are being used exclusively for the Company's expenditures.
      The monthly payments on these cards include all of the monthly interest
      being charged by the credit card company and the "principal" balances are
      being repaid on a 12-month repayment schedule. The interest rates being
      paid to the credit card companies vary between 2.99% and 16.74%. The
      average interest rate paid was 8.44% for the period from August 18, 2005
      (date of the purchase of Robotics) through March 31, 2006.

o     The Company has an additional note payable to George Coupe in the amount
      of $200. This demand note was issued in 2002 as part of the initial
      capitalization of Robotics and is due March 31, 2011. The note is
      non-interest bearing through April 1, 2006. Subsequent to that date, the
      note will bear interest at the rate of 8.0% per year. This note is
      reflected in notes payable, related parties on the Company's balance
      sheet.

o     The Company has a debt payable to Ralph McKittrick in the amount of
      $46,300 for unpaid wages prior to December 31, 1988. The debt is
      non-interest bearing. The amount of the debt has not changed since it was
      incurred.


o     The Company, through its Robotics subsidiary, has a relationship with
      Holo-Dek. Ralph McKittrick, the CEO of Kingston, is also the CEO of
      Holo-Dek (Ralph McKittrick is the largest shareholder, directly or
      indirectly, in Kingston and the second largest shareholder in Holo-Dek).
      Robotics and Holo-Dek share office facilities, a number of employees and
      certain expenses. The Trust, an investor in Kingston and Robotics, is also
      a significant lender of working capital to Holo-Dek. The Company is
      considering acquiring Holo-Dek. As of March 31, 2006, Holo-Dek has
      provided working capital advances to Robotics in the amount of $62,549,
      shown in current liabilities on the Company's balance sheet. Up until
      October 31, 2004, the Trust invested directly into Robotics, with the
      funding being in the form of debt that was converted to stock. The debt
      and accumulated interest totaled $1,836,752 as of October 31, 2004. As of
      October 31, 2004, the accrual of interest on the debt was temporarily
      delayed until October 31, 2005, at which time interest accrued at the rate
      of 8% per year. Interest accrued from October 31, 2005 until June, 2006,
      when the debt was converted to stock, which was forgiven by the Trust.
      After October 31, 2004, the Trust invested into Holo-Dek, which in turn
      funded Robotics on an as needed basis, through the working capital advance
      account, which loans aggregated $62,549 at March 31, 2006 (The terms of
      those advances are: it is a demand note payable April 1, 2007. Subsequent
      to that date, the note will bear an annual interest rate of 8.0%)


o     The Company has a licensing and royalty agreement in connection with the
      co-ownership of certain technology. The Hexel Corporation ("Hexel")
      originally developed the robotics technology. That corporation is still in
      existence, however, with limited operations. There are two current
      employees of Robotics who are stockholders in Hexel. In addition, a major
      stockholder in the Company also owns a minor interest in Hexel. Hexel has
      licensed the use of all intellectual property to Robotics. Under the
      agreement, Robotics is required to pay to Hexel, on a quarterly reporting
      basis, 2% of gross sales, less shipping, tax, and other customary costs
      normally born by the seller, on products sold which incorporate that
      certain licensed software and intellectual property. Any
      enhancements/developments by Robotics to the robot technology, including
      software, is co-owned with Hexel through the licensing agreement. At March
      31, 2006, $14,135 was owed to Hexel with $7,951 recorded as an expense
      during the year ended March 31, 2006.

o     The Company has a related party note and loan payable to the Trust,
      discussed in Note 5, and the Company is the lessee on two related party
      capital leases, discussed in Note 9.

<PAGE>

                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 19

ITEM 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

All references to the Company's Forms 8-K, 10-QSB and 10-KSB include reference
to File No. 0-15840.


 (a) Exhibits
                                                                      Page
 Exhibit No.        Document                                         Number
 -----------        --------                                         ------
 3.1                The Certificate of
                    Incorporation of the
                    Registrant, filed as Exhibit
                    3(a) to Registrant's
                    Registration Statement on Form
                    S-1 (File No. 33-12019), filed
                    on February 17, 1987, as
                    amended by Amendment Nos. 1,2
                    and 3 filed on March 25, April
                    3 and April 7, 1987,
                    respectively (the "S-1
                    Registration Statement"), is
                    incorporated herein by
                    reference.
 3.2                The By-Laws of the Registrant,
                    filed as Exhibit 3(b) to the
                    Registrant's S-1 Registration
                    Statement, is incorporated
                    herein by reference.
 14                 The Code of Ethics of the
                    Registrant, filed as Exhibit 14
                    to the Registrant's March 31,
                    2005 Form 10-KSB, is
                    incorporated herein by
                    reference.
 15                 Triangular Gimbal, Patent No: US 6,240,799
                    B1 and Systems and Methods Employing a
                    Rotary Track, Patent No: US 6,196,081 B1
 21*                List of Company's subsidiaries                     35
 31.1, 31.2*        Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification           36-37
 32.1, 32.2*        Section 1350 - Certification                     38-39

* Filed herewith

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:


The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on August 19, 2005 regarding the
acquisition of Parallel Robotic Systems Inc.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

    As of March 31,                        2006                     2005
                                         --------                 --------

    Audit Fees                           $ 35,881                 $ 45,117
    Audit Related Fees                         --                       --
    Tax Fees                                   --                       --
    Other Fees                                 --                       --
                                         --------                 --------
    Total Fees                           $ 35,881                 $ 45,117
                                         ========                 ========

                                   SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the 26th day of
January, 2007.


                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.

                           By: /s/ Ralph E. McKittrick
                               ------------------------------------------
                               Ralph E. McKittrick
                               Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

           Signature                                   Title                        Date

<S>                                <C>                                         <C>
/s/ Ralph E. McKittrick            Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
-----------------------            Principal Executive                         January 26, 2007
Ralph E. McKittrick

/s/ George J. Coupe
-----------------------            Chief Financial Officer                     January 26, 2007
George J. Coupe

/s/ James W. Byrne
-----------------------            Director                                    January 26, 2007
James W. Byrne
</TABLE>



<PAGE>


                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 20


                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.



                                                                           Page
                                                                          Number
                                                                          ------

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm                     20

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2006 and
March 31, 2005                                                              21

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005                                           22

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
for the Period from April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2006                         23

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005                                           24

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements                            25-33




<PAGE>









                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 21

                            HANSEN, BARNETT & MAXWELL
                           A Professional Corporation
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                            5 Triad Center, Suite 750
                          Salt Lake City, UT 84180-1128
                              Phone: (801) 532-2200
                               Fax: (801) 532-7944
                                 www.hbmcpas.com


             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Kingston Systems Inc. Hampton, New
Hampshire

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Kingston Systems Inc. and
subsidiary, as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the years
then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Kingston Systems Inc. and subsidiary as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred
losses and has current ratio deficits. As discussed in Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements, there is substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans concerning
these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.

                            HANSEN, BARNETT & MAXWELL

Salt Lake City, Utah
June 20, 2006


<PAGE>


                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 22


                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                    March 31,          March 31,
                                                                      2006               2005
                                                                  -----------        -----------
<S>                                                               <C>                <C>
                                        ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents                                         $    19,722        $        --
Accounts receivable                                                   138,542                 --
Inventory                                                             291,391                 --
Related party lease, current portion                                   13,636                 --
Other current assets                                                    2,692                 --
                                                                  -----------        -----------
     TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS                                         $   465,983        $        --

OTHER ASSETS:
Property and equipment, net of accumulated
  depreciation of $6,221                                               25,946                 --
Software, net of accumulated amortization
  of $1,098                                                               834                 --
Software development costs, net of accumulated
  amortization of $9,701                                              145,986                 --
Security deposits                                                      12,000                 --
Related party lease, non-current portion                               38,500                 --
                                                                  -----------        -----------
     TOTAL ASSETS                                                 $   689,249        $        --
                                                                  ===========        ===========

                        LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable                                                  $   149,511        $        --
Accrued expenses                                                       42,737            100,000
Deferred revenue                                                      179,480                 --
Capitalized lease obligations, current portion                         16,520                 --
Credit card advances, related party                                    80,263                 --
Related party advances                                                 62,549                 --
Note payable, including accrued interest of $336,611                1,836,752                 --
Judgment payable, including accrued interest of $638,123 and
  $606,274 as of March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005, respectively      992,006            960,157
Wages payable, related party                                           46,300             46,300
Notes payable, related parties, current portion                        16,200                 --
Loan payable, Flood Trust                                             100,000                 --
                                                                  -----------        -----------
     TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES                                    $ 3,522,318        $ 1,106,457

LONG TERM LIABILITIES:
Note payable, related party, non-current portion                       64,000                 --
Capitalized lease obligations, non-current portion                     53,784                 --
                                                                  -----------        -----------
     TOTAL LIABILITIES                                            $ 3,640,102        $ 1,106,457
                                                                  -----------        -----------
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
Common stock:
  $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized;
   4,988,889 shares issued and outstanding as of
   March 31, 2006 (612,251 shares issuable) and March 31, 2005         49,889             49,889
Additional paid-in capital                                         10,007,601         10,007,601
Accumulated deficit                                               (12,967,587)       (11,123,191)
Treasury stock at cost; 24,906 shares                                 (40,756)           (40,756)
                                                                  -----------        -----------
Total shareholders' deficit                                        (2,950,853)        (1,106,457)
                                                                  -----------        -----------
     TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT                  $   689,249        $        --
                                                                  ===========        ===========
</TABLE>



              The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
                       consolidated financial statements.

<PAGE>


                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 23


                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

                                 THE YEARS ENDED

                                                  March 31,          March 31,
                                                    2006               2005
                                                ------------       ------------
Revenue                                         $    630,575        $        --
Cost of sales                                        389,759                 --
                                                ------------        -----------
 Gross profit                                        240,816                 --

Operating expense:
 Selling                                              23,797                 --
 General and administrative                          186,465             50,000
 Research and development                             50,608                 --
 Goodwill impairment                               1,787,431                 --
                                                ------------        -----------
   Total operating expense                         2,048,301             50,000
                                                ------------        -----------
Operating loss                                    (1,807,485)           (50,000)
                                                ------------        -----------
Other expense:
 Interest expense                                    (36,911)           (31,849)
                                                ------------        -----------
   Total other expense                               (36,911)           (81,849)
                                                ------------        -----------
Net loss before provision
 for income taxes                                 (1,844,396)           (81,849)

Provision for income taxes                                --                 --
                                                ------------        -----------

Net loss                                        $ (1,844,396)       $   (81,849)
                                                ============        ===========
Basic and diluted loss
 per share                                      $      (0.34)       $     (0.02)
                                                ============        ===========
Weighted-average number of
 common shares outstanding                         5,367,981          4,988,889
                                                ============        ===========


              The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
                       consolidated financial statements.

<PAGE>


                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 24



                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.
            CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
               FOR THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 1, 2004 TO MARCH 31, 2006

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                    Common Stock        Additional
                                --------------------     Paid-in     Treasury     Accumulated
                                  Shares     Amount      Capital      Stock         Deficit
                                ----------  --------   -----------   ---------   -------------
<S>                             <C>         <C>        <C>           <C>         <C>
Balance at
March 31, 2004                   4,988,889  $ 49,889   $10,007,601   $(40,756)   $(11,041,342)

Net loss for the year                   --        --            --         --         (81,849)

Balance at                      ----------  --------   -----------   ---------   -------------
March 31, 2005                   4,988,889    49,889    10,007,601    (40,756)    (11,123,191)

Net loss for the year                   --        --            --         --      (1,844,396)

Balance at                      ----------  --------   -----------   ---------   -------------
March 31, 2006                   4,988,889  $ 49,889   $10,007,601   $(40,756)   $(12,967,587)
                                ==========  ========   ===========   =========   =============
</TABLE>




              The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
                       consolidated financial statements.

<PAGE>


                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 25


                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                THE YEARS ENDED
                                                        ------------------------------
                                                          MARCH 31,         MARCH 31,
                                                            2006              2005
                                                        ------------      ------------
<S>                                                      <C>               <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
   Net loss                                              $(1,844,396)      $   (81,849)
   Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
      from operating activities:
    Depreciation and amortization                             17,020                --
    Impairment of goodwill                                 1,787,431                --
   Changes in assets and liabilities:
     Accounts receivable                                    (106,423)               --
     Inventory                                              (153,370)               --
     Accounts payable                                        143,919                --
     Other current assets                                     (1,894)               --
     Deferred revenue                                        (90,103)               --
     Accrued liabilities                                     (76,477)           50,000
     Accrued interest on judgment payable                     31,849            31,849
                                                         -----------       -----------
NET CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES                          (292,444)               --
                                                         -----------       -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
   Cash acquired in acquisition of Robotics                   38,988                --
   Purchase of equipment                                      (1,290)               --
   Purchase of software development                          (27,309)               --
   Repayment of related party receivable                     151,013                --
                                                         -----------       -----------
NET CASH FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES                           161,402                --
                                                         -----------       -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
   Related party advances                                     62,548                --
   Loan payable, Flood Trust                                 100,000                --
   Payments on credit card advances, related party           (10,909)               --
   Payment of capital lease                                     (875)               --
                                                         -----------       -----------
NET CASH FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES                           150,764                --
                                                         -----------       -----------
Net increase in cash                                          19,722                --
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning                              --                --
                                                         -----------       -----------
Cash and cash equivalents, ending                        $    19,722       $        --
                                                         ===========       ===========

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Capital lease for equipment                              $    18,819                --
Assumption of capital lease from related party                52,136                --
Reclassification of software development costs to
  inventory                                                   40,506                --

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest                                   $     5,069       $        --
Cash paid for income taxes                                        --                --
</TABLE>


              The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
                       consolidated financial statements.

<PAGE>

                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 26

                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                             MARCH 31, 2006 AND 2005

NOTE 1 -- ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization, Acquisitions and Mergers and Controlling Shareholder -- Kingston
Systems Inc. ("Kingston" or the "Company") was incorporated in 1983 and
reincorporated in Delaware on January 12, 1987. The Company operated a
proprietary recovery system that reclaimed paper pulp and non-biodegradable
polyethylene from packaging material scrap. The Company sold the recovered fiber
as substitute for virgin wood pulp and the reclaimed polyethylene for use in
injection molding. The Company experienced some difficult and turbulent periods
and subsequently made its last Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filing
of a Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 1988. The Company had been
inactive, with the exception of expenses accrued for professional services and
interest accrued on the judgment payable, until August of 2005 when, as
disclosed in a Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2005, the Company acquired all of
the issued and outstanding common stock of Parallel Robotics Systems Corporation
("Robotics"), making Robotics a wholly-owned subsidiary. Robotics is in the
business of manufacturing robotic machinery and it has been an operating company
since February 11, 2002.

The majority and controlling shareholders of the Company are the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

            Name                       Shares             Comments
            ----                       ------             --------
<S>                                    <C>                <C>
            Kingston Associates          105,902          Limited Partnership 60% controlled by Ralph McKittrick,
                                                          CEO of Kingston Systems
            Ralph McKittrick              32,453
            Thor Corporation           2,332,133          Thor Corporation is 100% controlled by Ralph McKittrick
            All others                 2,518,401
                                       ---------
                                       4,988,889
            Flood Trust                  612,251          Shares issuable.  See Note 2
                                       ---------
            Total                      5,601,140
                                       =========
</TABLE>


Nature of Business -- The Company's revenue generating subsidiary, Robotics, is
in the business of building robots, called rotopods and hexapods. These robots
are similar to the type of apparatus used to move flight simulators. The robots
allow movement in all planes of motion and are primarily purchased by companies
for product development and testing, although some robots are used in
manufacturing. A significant component of the robot package is the customized
software program that operates the robot's motions. On average, it takes three
to six months to build a robot. Although many of the components of a robot are
standard from contract to contract, each contract typically requires certain
modifications to the standard product. A single contract generally generates
revenue of approximately $125,000. Robotics sells its products internationally.

Basis of Presentation -- The consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").
The Company's fiscal year is from April 1 through March 31.

Consolidation -- The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts and transactions of Kingston for all periods presented and the accounts
and transactions of Robotics from August 18, 2005. Intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates -- The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition -- The Company categorizes all pre-shipment progress
payments from the customers and service agreement revenues as "deferred revenue"
on the balance sheet. Upon shipment of the robot, the Company releases the
prepayment liabilities to revenue, along with the related cost of sales. Should
a completed robot have its shipment temporarily delayed, as authorized by the
customer (for example, the customer's facility may not yet be prepared to
install the robot), the Company will recognize the robot's prepayment revenue
and cost of sales at time of completion of the robot. The Company recognizes any
deferred service agreement revenue over the life of the agreement. Costs are
recognized as incurred.

<PAGE>


                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 27


                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Business Condition -- The accompanying consolidated financial statements have
been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of
assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As
shown in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31,
2006, the Company incurred a net loss of $1,844,396 ($56,965, excluding the
adjustment for goodwill impairment). As noted in the previous paragraph, the
Company's subsidiary, Robotics, receives progress payments from customers that
are not recognized as revenue until the product is shipped or billed as a
completed unit sold. That customer prepayment liability was $161,563 at March
31, 2006 (shown as a component of "deferred revenue" on the Company's balance
sheet) and reflects revenue of which is expected to be recognized in the fiscal
year 2007. Nonetheless, the losses from operations and the current ratio deficit
raise doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a
reasonable period of time. The consolidated financial statements do not include
any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded
assets or the amount and classification of liabilities which might be necessary
should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company's
continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate
sufficient cash flows to meet its obligations on a timely basis, to obtain
additional financing as may be required, and ultimately to attain successful
operations for an extended period of time. Should the Company not succeed in its
pursuit of either equity financing, debt financing, or significant sales
improvements, the Company may not be able to continue as a going concern and may
need to curtail operations.

Cash and Cash Equivalents -- Cash equivalents include highly liquid, short-term
investments with original maturities of three months or less, readily
convertible to known amounts of cash.

Accounts Receivable -- Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount.
An allowance for doubtful accounts would be the Company's best estimate of the
amount of probable credit losses in the Company's existing accounts receivable.
Management regularly analyzes accounts receivable, including any historical
write-off experience, customer creditworthiness and current economic trends to
determine a need, if any, for an allowance for doubtful accounts. As of March
31, 2006, management has determined that no allowance for doubtful accounts is
necessary.

Inventory -- Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or
market. Market value is estimated based upon assumptions made about future
demand and market conditions. If the Company determines that the actual market
value differs from the carrying value of the inventory, the Company will make an
adjustment to reduce the value of the inventory. At March 31, 2006, inventory
consisted of work in process materials, capitalized labor and spare parts for
five robotics contracts (at the time a robot is completed, the product is
shipped-the Company does not have finished goods inventory). Those amounts were:

            Inventory as of:             March 31, 2006    March 31, 2005
                                         --------------    --------------
            Work in Process                 $191,941          $     --
            Capitalized Labor                 71,074                --
            Spare Parts                       28,376                --
                                            --------          --------
            Total                           $291,391          $     --


Property and Equipment -- Assets are recorded at cost and depreciation is
computed using the straight-line method over the assets' estimated useful lives,
which range from three to seven years. Expenditures for maintenance, repairs,
and renewals are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for major renewals
and betterments, that extend the useful lives of existing equipment, are
capitalized and depreciated. On retirement or disposition of property and
equipment, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed and any resulting
gain or loss is recognized in the statement of operations.

Long-lived assets -- Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when
situations arise that indicate the asset could be impaired. Recoverability of
assets to be held and used is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of
an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such
assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is
measured by the amount that the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair
value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the
carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

Income Taxes -- No income taxes have been paid or accrued because the Company
has had no net taxable income since inception for any fiscal period for which a
tax return is required. The Company recognizes the amount of income taxes
payable or refundable for the current year and recognizes deferred tax assets
and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement amounts of certain assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases (if such a difference exists), and the effect of net
operating loss carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets would be reduced by a
valuation allowance to the extent that uncertainty exists as to whether the
deferred tax assets would be ultimately realized.

Research and Product Development Costs -- The Company is focusing its research
and development on perfecting the software and hardware capabilities of the R
Series line, improving the joint retaining rings and sockets on the P Series
line, and exploring other uses for its products. The Company expenses research
and product development costs as incurred.

<PAGE>


                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 28


                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Net Loss Per Share -- Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing
the income or loss available to common shareholders by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss)
per share is identical to basic earnings (loss) per share, as the Company has no
dilutive securities at this time.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments -- The carrying amounts reported in the
balance sheets for accounts receivables and debt obligations approximate their
fair values.

Intangible Assets -- The Company has an intangible asset, identified as
"Software development" reflected on its consolidated balance sheet as of March
31, 2006. This robotic software is a long-term asset and is the Company-built
control system software for operating the machines that Robotics has been
manufacturing and selling, and continues to sell to various industries. The
amortization periods for the software development asset have been determined to
be five and ten years. The five year amortization period applies to the portion
of the asset that was developed to support additional generic motion control
systems. The ten year amortization period applies to the portion of the asset
that was developed as additions to the core application programming, essential
to the basic operation of the robot.


The carrying value of the software development asset is compared to its net
realizable value at each balance sheet date, with any impairment recognized
immediately. No material changes to management's net realizable value estimate
occurred in the period ended March 31, 2006.


Shipping Costs -- Costs to ship products to customers are charged to operations
as incurred. During the years ended March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005, the
Company recognized shipping costs of $4,799 and $0, respectively, in cost of
sales.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123 (revised
2004),"Share-Based Payment," which is an amendment to SFAS No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation" and supersedes Accounting Principles Board ("APB")
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. This new standard
eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions
using APB No. 25 and requires such transactions to be accounted for using a
fair-valued-based method, with the resulting cost recognized in the Company's
consolidated financial statements. This new standard is effective for annual
periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company has not awarded or granted
any share-based compensation to date and, therefore, the adoption of this
standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated
financial statements until such time as share-based compensation is granted.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchange of Non-monetary
Assets." SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29, "Accounting for Non-monetary
Transactions," to eliminate the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar
productive assets. The Company is required to apply this statement to
non-monetary exchanges after December 31, 2005. The adoption of this standard
has not had a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial
statements.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections" which replaces APB Opinions No. 20 "Accounting Changes" and SFAS
No. 3 "Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements -- An
Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28." SFAS No. 154 provides guidance on the
accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It
establishes retrospective application, or the earliest practicable date, as the
required method for reporting a change in accounting principle and restatement
with respect to the reporting of a correction of an error. SFAS No. 154 is
effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005.

In June 2005, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") reached a consensus
on Issue No. 05-6, "Determining the Amortization Period for Leasehold
Improvements." The guidance requires that leasehold improvements acquired in a
business combination or purchased subsequent to the inception of a lease be
amortized over the lesser of the useful life of the assets or a term that
includes renewals that are reasonably assured at the date of the business
combination or purchase. The guidance is effective for periods beginning after
June 29, 2005. The adoption of EITF No. 05-6 is not expected to have a material
impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

<PAGE>

                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 29

                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, which is an amendment of SFAS
Nos. 133 and 140. This statement; a) permits fair value remeasurement for any
hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise
would require bifurcation, b) clarifies which interest-only strip and
principal-only strip are not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133, c)
establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets
to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid
financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation,
d) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are
not embedded derivatives, e) amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on
a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial
instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative
financial instrument. This statement is effective for financial statements for
fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. Earlier adoption of this
statement is permitted as of the beginning of an entity's fiscal year, provided
the entity has not yet issued any financial statements for that fiscal year. The
adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company's consolidated financial statements.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, which amends SFAS No. 140. This
statement establishes, among other things, the accounting for all separately
recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. This statement amends
SFAS No. 140 to require that all separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. This
statement permits, but does not require, the subsequent measurement of
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value.
An entity that uses derivative instruments to mitigate the risks inherent in
servicing assets and servicing liabilities is required to account for those
derivative instruments at fair value. Under this statement, an entity can elect
subsequent fair value measurement to account for its separately recognized
servicing assets and servicing liabilities. By electing that option, an entity
may simplify its accounting because this statement permits income statement
recognition of the potential offsetting changes in fair value of those servicing
assets and servicing liabilities and derivative instruments in the same
accounting period. This statement is effective for financial statements for
fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. Earlier adoption of this
statement is permitted as of the beginning of an entity's fiscal year, provided
the entity has not yet issued any financial statements for that fiscal year.
Management believes that adoption of this standard will not have a material
impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.


NOTE 2 -- ACQUISITION OF PARALLEL ROBOTICS SYSTEMS

On August 18, 2005, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding
common stock of Robotics for $1.00 (Robotics had issued no stock at that time
and one share of common stock was issued to Kingston to effect the acquisition),
making Robotics a wholly-owned subsidiary. At the time of the acquisition,
Robotics was indebted to the Trust in the amount of $1,836,752, so the total
purchase price for Robotics was $1,836,753. Shortly after the acquisition, an
Exchange Agreement was signed between Kingston, Robotics and the Trust, pursuant
to which the Trust was issued the Note by Robotics. The Trust then assigned to
Kingston its rights as payee under the Note in exchange for Kingston's agreement
to issue 612,251 shares of Kingston's common stock to the Trust. Kingston, as
the new payee under the Note, then cancelled the Note. The shares were issued in
June, 2006 and the Company's obligation in the amount of $1,836,752 to the Trust
was deemed to be the total outstanding indebtedness until that time. Kingston
filed a Form 8-K on this transaction on August 19, 2005.

This transaction has been accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141,
"Business Combinations," using the purchase method of accounting. The Company
has evaluated the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed as of the date of acquisition. The purchase of Robotics resulted in the
recording of the excess of cost over the fair value of acquired net assets
(goodwill) of $1,787,431 (see detail below). Subsequent to the acquisition, the
Company immediately evaluated the goodwill for impairment and determined that it
was impaired (the Company could not establish a basis for the goodwill, given
the historical performance of Robotics).


<PAGE>

                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 30

                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



         Acquisition of Robotics:
Fair value of assets acquired:
   Cash                                                      $       38,988
   Accounts receivable                                               32,119
   Note receivable, related party                                   151,013
   Inventory                                                         97,495
   Other assets (1)                                                 181,700
   Property, equipment and software, net                             13,767
                                                             --------------
Total fair value of assets acquired                          $      515,082
                                                             --------------

Fair value of liabilities assumed:
   Accounts payable                                          $        5,591
   Loan payable, related party                                       91,172
   Deferred revenue                                                 269,583
   Other liabilities (2)                                             19,215
   Notes payable                                                     80,200
                                                             --------------
Total fair value of liabilities assumed                      $      465,761
                                                             --------------

Fair value of net assets acquired                            $       49,321
                                                             ==============

Equity issued in lieu of cash
                                                                  1,836,752
Acquisition costs
                                                                         --
Goodwill-excess of cost over fair value of
 acquired net assets                                              1,787,431
Impairment of goodwill                                       $   (1,787,431)



(1) Comprised of a software development asset valued at $168,903 (the fair value
of the software development asset encompasses the value of the Company's
licenses and underlying patents and trade secrets), a security deposit of
$12,000 and $797 of employee advances.

(2) Comprised of payroll and tax liabilities of $10,113, $6,184 of liability to
the Hexel Corporation for software licensing and $2,918 for an outstanding auto
loan.


NOTE 3 -- PRO-FORMA RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


The following table sets forth the Company's results of operations for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, identifying the impact of the
acquisition of Robotics, as if it had taken place on April 1, 2004.

 Pro-forma Income Statements            Fiscal Year Ended     Fiscal Year Ended
                                        March 31, 2005        March 31, 2006
                                        -----------------     -----------------
 Revenue                                $        747,186      $         641,586
 Cost of sales                                   521,165                409,637
                                        ----------------      -----------------
 Gross profit                                    226,021                231,949
 Expense                                       2,259,223                377,629
 Other expense                                   187,652                 40,040
                                        ----------------      -----------------
 Net loss                               $     (2,220,854)     $        (185,720)
                                        ================      =================
 Basic and diluted loss per share       $          (0.40)     $           (0.03)
 Weighted-average common shares                5,601,140              5,601,140
 outstanding


Included in the expense for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 is the goodwill
impairment charge of $1,787,431, discussed in detail in Note 2.

<PAGE>

                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 31

                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4 -- RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As of March 31, 2006, the Company was involved in the following related party
transactions:

o     The Company has credit card advances, related party, in current
      liabilities on its March 31, 2006 balance sheet. Those advances are from
      George Coupe, President of Robotics, in the amount of $80,263. Those
      advances are for the financing of operations and certain capital asset
      purchases. Those advances consist of the balances on personal credit cards
      of George Coupe that were and are being used exclusively for the Company's
      expenditures. The monthly payments on these cards include all of the
      monthly interest being charged by the credit card company and the
      "principal" balances are being repaid on a 12-month repayment schedule.
      The interest rates being paid to the credit card companies vary between
      2.99% and 16.74%. The average interest rate paid was 8.44% for the period
      from August 18, 2005 (date of the purchase of Robotics) through March 31,
      2006.

o     The Company has a note payable, related party, to George Coupe in the
      amount of $200. This demand note was issued in 2002 as part of the initial
      capitalization of Robotics and is due March 31, 2011. The note is
      non-interest bearing through April 1, 2006. Subsequent to that date, the
      note will bear interest at the rate of 8.0% per year.

o     The Company has a note payable, related party, non-interest bearing to
      Ralph McKittrick in the amount of $46,300 for unpaid wages prior to
      December 31, 1988. The amount of the debt has not changed since it was
      incurred. It is reflected in current liabilities on the Company's balance
      sheet.

o     As previously discussed, the Company, through its Robotics subsidiary, has
      a relationship with a privately owned company named Holo-Dek. Ralph
      McKittrick, the CEO of Kingston, is also the CEO of Holo-Dek (Ralph
      McKittrick is the largest shareholder, directly or indirectly, in Kingston
      and the second largest shareholder in Holo-Dek). Robotics and Holo-Dek
      share office facilities, a number of employees and certain expenses. The
      Trust, an investor in Kingston and Robotics, is also a significant lender
      of working capital to Holo-Dek. The Company is considering acquiring
      Holo-Dek. As of March 31, 2006, Holo-Dek has provided working capital
      advances to Robotics in the amount of $62,549, which is shown in current
      liabilities on the Company's balance sheet. Until October 31, 2004, the
      Trust invested directly into Robotics, with the funding being in the form
      of debt that was converted to stock. The debt and accumulated interest
      totaled $1,836,752 as of October 31, 2004. As of October 31, 2004, the
      accrual of interest on the debt was temporarily delayed until October 31,
      2005, at which time interest accrued at the rate of 8% per year. Interest
      accrued from October 31, 2005 until June, 2006, when the debt was
      converted to stock, which was forgiven by the Trust. After October 31,
      2004, the Trust invested into Holo-Dek, which in turn funded Robotics on
      an as needed basis through the working capital advance account, which
      loans aggregated $62,549 at March 31, 2006. The terms of those advances
      are: it is a demand note payable April 1, 2007. Subsequent to that date,
      the note will bear an annual interest rate of 8.0%.

o     The Company has a licensing and royalty agreement in connection with the
      co-ownership of certain technology. The Hexel Corporation ("Hexel")
      originally developed the robotics technology. That corporation is still in
      existence, however, with limited operations. Two current employees of
      Robotics are stockholders in Hexel. In addition, a major stockholder in
      the Company also owns a minor interest in Hexel. Hexel has licensed the
      use of all intellectual property to Robotics. Under the agreement,
      Robotics is required to pay to Hexel, on a quarterly reporting basis, 2%
      of gross sales, less shipping, tax, and other customary costs normally
      born by the seller, on products sold which incorporate that certain
      licensed software and intellectual property. Any enhancements/developments
      by Robotics to the robot technology, including software, is co-owned with
      Hexel through the licensing agreement. At March 31, 2006, $14,135 was owed
      to Hexel with $7,951 recorded as an expense during the year ended March
      31, 2006.

o     The Company has a related party note and loan payable to the Trust,
      discussed in Note 5, and the Company is the lessee on two related party
      capital leases, discussed in Note 9.


NOTE 5 -- JUDGMENT, NOTE AND LOAN PAYABLE

In addition to the notes and loan payable discussed in Note 4, the current
liabilities as of March 31, 2006 reflect a judgment payable of $353,883
principal and $638,123 accrued interest. In early April 2006, the judgment
creditor agreed to release the judgment for a cash payment in the amount of
$100,000. The remaining judgment balance of $253,883, plus interest accrued
through March 31, 2006 of $638,123, will be reflected as a debt forgiveness gain
upon settlement of the judgment.

The Company has a note payable to the Trust for $80,000. Of that amount, $16,000
is a current liability and $64,000 is a long term liability. This note was
issued in 2002 as part of the initial capitalization of Robotics and requires
yearly principle payments of $16,000 through March 31, 2011. The note was
non-interest bearing through April 1, 2006, and now bears interest at the rate
of 8.0% per year (unpaid interest will be compounded). The Company has not yet
made a payment on this note.

The Company has a loan payable to the Trust in the amount of $100,000, shown in
current liabilities on the Company's balance sheet. This loan was made in March
of 2006 and is payable on demand on or after September 10, 2006, at the
discretion of the Trust. The loan bears an annual interest rate of 8.0%.

<PAGE>

                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 32

                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


As of March 31, 2006, the Company had a note payable to the Trust in the amount
of $1,836,752, comprised of $1,500,141 principal and $336,611 of accrued
interest. This note was payable upon demand. As of October, 2004, the accrual of
interest on the note was temporarily delayed until October 31, 2005. Beginning
that month, interest accrued at the rate of 8% per year. Interest accrued from
October 31, 2005 until June, 2006, when the debt was converted to stock, which
was forgiven by the Trust. This note is shown in current liabilities on the
Company's balance sheet.


See Note 9 regarding the Company's capital lease obligations.


NOTE 6 -- INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The Company has an intangible asset, identified as "Software development"
reflected on its consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2006. This robotic
software is a long-term asset and is the Robotics-built control system software
for operating the machines that Robotics has been manufacturing and selling, and
continues to sell to various industries. The software is used to drive the
motion simulation robots that have been sold for bio medical research,
positioning system robots for automotive production and motion testing robots
for oil pipelines. An analysis of the new robotic capability or features that
each new software project supports is conducted after the software project is
completed and after the new capability is tested functionally in the robot. The
results of this analysis are used to determine the expected life of the software
for this new capability in terms of future revenues, and with a view toward not
overstating this asset at any time over its useful life on a reasonable and
consistent basis. This software is co-owned with the Hexel Corporation (see Note
4), the corporation that patented the robotic technology and licensed the
robotic technology to Robotics. The carrying value of this software development
asset is compared to its net realizable value at each balance sheet date, with
any impairment recognized immediately. No material changes to management's net
realizable value estimate occurred in the year ended March 31, 2006 and
management believes that the value of the software is not impaired at March 31,
2006. The amortization periods for the software development asset have been
determined to be five and ten years. The five year amortization period applies
to the portion of the asset that was developed to support additional generic
motion control systems. The ten year amortization period applies to the portion
of the asset that was developed as additions to the core application
programming, essential to the basic operation of the robot.


The following is the anticipated amortization expense for the next five years
for the software development asset as of March 31, 2006:

                    For the year
                   ended March 31,         Amortization Expense
                   ---------------         --------------------
                   2007                          $19,305
                   2008                          $19,305
                   2009                          $19,305
                   2010                          $19,305
                   2011                          $15,620
                   Thereafter                    $53,146


NOTE 7 -- SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT

At March 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had 4,988,889 shares of common stock
issued and outstanding (At March 31, 2006, there were 612,251 shares
issuable-see Note 2) with 10,000,000 shares authorized with a par value of
$0.01. At March 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had $10,007,601 in additional
paid-in capital and an accumulated deficit of $12,967,587 and $11,123,191,
respectively. At March 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had 24,906 shares of
treasury stock, valued at $40,756.

NOTE 8 -- INCOME TAXES


The Company had net operating loss ("NOL") carry-forwards up to March 1988 when
it last filed with the SEC. The Company has had net operating losses since that
date. These net operating losses expire after 15 years for losses incurred
through March 1997 and 20 years for losses incurred beginning with the March
1998 year-end. Control of Robotics changed with the acquisition by the Company.
In accordance with the internal revenue code, the accumulated losses of Robotics
incurred prior to the Company's acquisition is limited to an annual amount of
approximately $79,531 and a total limit of approximately $1,590,627 over a
20-year period. As of March 31, 2006, the Company had consolidated net operating
loss carry-forwards for federal income tax reporting purposes of approximately
$2,420,678 which, if unused, will expire between 2007 through 2026.

<PAGE>

                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 33


                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The deferred tax asset and the provision for income taxes for the years ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005 were:

For the years ended March 31,                          2006               2005
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Deferred tax assets - operating loss
  carry-forwards                            $       958,831      $     321,881
Deferred tax liability - software
  development costs                         $       (45,282)                --
Valuation allowance                                (913,549)          (321,881)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Deferred Tax Asset                      $            --      $          --
==============================================================================

For the years ended March 31,                          2006               2005
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax at federal statutory rate (34%)         $      (627,095)     $     (27,829)
Operating losses of Robotics acquired              (581,739)                --
Non-deductible expenses                             708,023                 --
Expiration of NOL carry-forward                      12,615            407,898
State tax benefit                                  (103,471)            (4,592)
Change in valuation allowance                       591,667           (375,477)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Provision for Income Taxes                  $            --      $          --
==============================================================================



NOTE 9 -- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Lease

The Company's Robotics subsidiary has a lease obligation for office space and an
assembly/ research and development facility in Hampton, New Hampshire, which is
accounted for as an operating lease. The lease was executed in 2002 and the term
of the lease is five years, ending March 31, 2007. The lease includes a base
rent and common area/maintenance payment. The payment for the fiscal year
2006-2007 is expected to be $161,950. The lease does not have a renewal clause
for the period subsequent to March 31, 2007. As discussed in Note 4, Robotics
shares office space with Holo-Dek. The costs of leasing the facility in Hampton,
New Hampshire are allocated between the two companies based upon square footage.
Total lease expense for the year ended March 31, 2006 was $13,954.

Capital Leases

The Company has executed a capital lease for manufacturing equipment in the
amount of $19,766. As of March 31, 2006, accumulated depreciation on the
equipment was $1,412 and the net book value was $18,354. The following are the
expected minimum lease payments for the next five years:

      Year Ending March 31,                              Capital Lease
      ---------------------                              -------------
      2007                                                  $ 5,688
      2008                                                    5,688
      2009                                                    5,688
      2010                                                    5,688
      2011                                                    3,206
                                                            -------
      Total                                                 $25,958
      Less: Interest Included                                (7,790)
                                                            -------
      Total Obligations under Capital Lease                 $18,168
      Current Portion Due                                   $(2,884)
      Long-Term Portion                                     $15,284

<PAGE>

                                                           Form 10-KSB/A Page 34

                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



The Company's Robotics subsidiary is the named lessee on two leases used to
acquire equipment for Holo-Dek (see Note 4). The Company has ultimate
responsibility to make all payments regarding the leases. A total of $52,136 of
equipment was acquired. The leases are shown on the Company's balance sheet as a
related party lease asset and a capitalized lease obligation. The following are
the expected minimum lease payments for the next five years.


                 Year Ending March 31,                  Capital Leases
                 ---------------------                  --------------
                 2007                                         $ 21,420
                 2008                                           21,420
                 2009                                           14,375
                 2010                                            6,948
                 2011                                            6,148
                                                              --------
                 Total                                        $ 70,311
                 Less: Interest Included                       (18,175)
                                                              --------
                 Total Obligation under Capital Leases        $ 52,136
                 Current Portion Due                          $(13,636)
                 Long-Term Portion                            $ 38,500


NOTE 10 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT

The current liabilities as of March 31, 2006 reflect a judgment payable of
$353,883 principal and $638,123 accrued interest. In early April 2006, the
judgment creditor agreed to release the judgment for a cash payment in the
amount of $100,000. The remaining judgment balance of $253,883, plus interest
accrued through March 31, 2006 of $638,123, will be reflected as a debt
forgiveness gain upon settlement of the judgment.