alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of 677 New Loudon Corporation, Doing Business as Nite Moves, Appellant, v State of New York Tax Appeals Tribunal et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 6, 2012;

decided August 28, 2012

Motion by CMSG Restaurant Group, LLC for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15093]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Initial Review 
Group (NCIPC IRG)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
group:

    Times and Date: 12 p.m.-1:30 p.m., July 16, 2009 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5, 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Section 10(d) of Public Law 
92-463.
    Purpose: This group is charged with providing advice and 
guidance to the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, 
and the Director, CDC, concerning the scientific and technical merit 
of grant and cooperative agreement applications received from 
academic institutions and other public and private profit and 
nonprofit organizations, including State and local government 
agencies, to conduct specific injury research that focuses on 
prevention and control.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the reporting 
and voting of the peer reviews conducted in response to Fiscal Year 
2009 Requests for Applications related to the following individual 
research announcements:
    (1) RFA-EH-09-001 Climate Change: Environmental Impact on Human 
Health (U01); (2) RFA-CD-09-001 Translating Research to protect 
Health Through Health Promotion, Prevention, and Preparedness (R18); 
(3) RFA-EH-09-002 Program to Expand State Public Health Laboratory 
Capacity for Newborn Bloodspot Screening (U01); (4) RFA-EH-009-003 
program to Enhance State Public Health Laboratory Capacity for 
Newborn Bloodspot Screening (U01); (5) RFA-TS-09-003 Environmental 
Health and Toxicology Educational Research Program (U01).
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Rick Waxweiler, PhD, 
Director, Extramural Research Program Office, National Center for 
Injury Prevention & Control and Executive Secretary, NCIPC IRG, CDC, 
4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop F-62, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, 
Telephone (770) 488-4850.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

    Dated: June 18, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-15093 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-50910

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Bradley Fariss Pieper, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:23-CR-1926-1

______________________________

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Bradley Fariss Pieper was charged with using interstate commerce to 

induce or coerce or attempt to induce or coerce a minor to engage in sexual 

activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). He appeals an order by the 

district court affirming the magistrate judge’s order of detention and 

requiring him to remain detained pending trial. 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 22, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50910 Document: 00517039881 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/22/2024
No. 23-50910

2

Pieper contends that the district court failed to consider the relevant 

factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) in finding that his appearance at trial and 

the safety of the community could not have been reasonably assured by 

conditions of pretrial release. He specifically argues that he rebutted the 

presumption against release that applies where probable cause supports that 

the defendant violated § 2422(b), see § 3142(e)(3)(E), by providing evidence 

of his personal history and characteristics to show that he is not a danger to 

the community. That evidence included his lack of criminal history, United 

States citizenship, and family ties in New Mexico, where he can reside with 

his parents.

We apply a deferential standard of review that “equate[s] to the 

abuse-of-discretion standard” when considering a district court’s pretrial 

detention order. See United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir. 

1992); United States v. Hare, 873 F.2d 796, 798 (5th Cir. 1989). Even if 

evidence is produced to rebut the presumption against release under 

§ 3142(e)(3), the presumption still “may be weighed in the evidentiary 

balance.” Hare, 873 F.2d at 799. Reviewing the record as a whole, we 

conclude that Pieper is not entitled to relief. The district court’s order is

supported by at least three of the four § 3142(g) factors: the nature and 

circumstances of the offense charged, the weight of the evidence against him,

and the seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would 

be posed by his release. Thus, we find no abuse of discretion by the district 

court in ordering Pieper detained pending trial. See Rueben, 974 F.2d at 586; 

Hare, 873 F.2d at 798. 

The order of detention pending trial is AFFIRMED.

Case: 23-50910 Document: 00517039881 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/22/2024
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40120

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SANDRA IRIS VENTURA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:12-CR-736-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Sandra Iris Ventura raises an

argument that she concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Morales-Mota, 704

F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 2374 (2013). In Morales-Mota,

704 F.3d at 412, this court, relying upon its holding in United States v. Joslin,

487 F. App’x 139, 141-43 (5th Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 1847 (2013),

rejected the argument that the Texas offense of “burglary of a habitation” is

outside the generic, contemporary definition of “burglary of a dwelling” under

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 13-40120 Document: 00512419394 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
No. 13-40120

U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) because it defines the “owner” of a habitation as a

person with a “greater right to possession.” Accordingly, the appellant’s motion

for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-40120 Document: 00512419394 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative, or  Renee Hallman, Contact Representative.  Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room H-303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-14919 Filed 6-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
exhibit10-4.htm
















Exhibit 10.4



AMENDMENT


To


Consultant Agreement












A Consulting Agreement was made and entered into effect on March 16, 2011 between AGH Management Corp. (the “Company) and William Mui (“Consultant”). Both parties agreed to transfer this consulting agreement to L.F. George Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, on June 20, 2011. The terms and conditions under the consulting agreement between the Company and the Consultant shall remain the same between L.F. George Holdings, Inc. and the Consultant.






















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Consultant have duly executed this amendment.












Company:                                                              Consultant:


AGH Management Corp.                                   William Mui

















____________________________              _________________________


Signature                                                              Signature


George Lam                                                          William Mui







____________________________              _________________________


Date                                                                       Date

















LF George Holdings, Inc.

















____________________________


Signature


George Lam












____________________________


Date
: — @,ala-

@. meas, Nod Kesedo ; 7-87-15
AY tore \S_ Downy pa WOKS. Toe \e14Ms
TLS ASS NNQOY Xo \es NSU AAQSLS Nook Yve

Nowa Scomeiecse dd Scom “Ss sows skokst SO 4
Bays SAS AO osien A AK, 1732d.¢ road_lo\

DOL Vee oT —
SSS

. __. -RECEIVED IN
e — , ; COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUD 13 2015 ~

Abel Acosta, Clerk.
Dismissal and Opinion Filed July 13, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00099-CV 

CARLA DEPAZA, Appellant 

V. 

AUSTIN INTERNATIONAL VENTURES INC., Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-06412-B 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By 

postcard dated January 23, 2015, we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed 

appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to 

do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated January 23, 2015, we 

notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant 

to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so 

might result in dismissal of the appeal. By letter dated March 27, 2015, we informed appellant 

the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to 

pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or 

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation that appellant had been 
 –2– 

found to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to 

do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has 

not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, or provided written documentation that she 

has been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs in the trial court. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 

150099F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

CARLA DEPAZA, Appellant 

No. 05-15-00099-CV V. 

AUSTIN INTERNATIONAL VENTURES 

INC., Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 2, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-06412-B. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered July 13, 2015.
#     All Disorders  

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPRSTVWZ
View All

## V

Vasculitis in the Nervous System

Von Hippel-Lindau Disease (VHL)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000012355
<NAME> THE BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         119,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  655,700<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    842,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,804,100
<PP&E>                                         875,500<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,126,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,333,400
<BONDS>                                      1,652,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,561,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,126,800
<SALES>                                      1,015,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,015,000
<CGS>                                          650,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  941,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .28<F3><F4>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .27<F4>
<FN>
<F1>Represents net trade receivables.
<F2>Represents net property, plant, and equipment.
<F3>Represents basic earnings per share.
<F4>Restated to reflect the Corporation's adoption of Statement of
    Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share".
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            46,330
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       1,173
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 149,440
<CASH>                                         101,937
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 288
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           3,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,569
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                115,529
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              9,702
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 98,961
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           23,571
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,022
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   306,569
<PREMIUMS>                                      88,648
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              7,769
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  31
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      55,638
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     16,870
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            17,268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,227
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,597
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,963
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 114,419
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             57,614
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (1,976)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              19,816
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                59,698
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 90,543
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        (1,976)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 593 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 593

     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
 whistleblower complaint received on August 12, 2019, by the Inspector 
General of the Intelligence Community should be transmitted immediately 
to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent 
   Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2019

  Mr. Curtis (for himself, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. McKinley, Mr. 
   Diaz-Balart, Mr. Tipton, and Mr. Stivers) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Permanent Select Committee on 
                              Intelligence

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
 whistleblower complaint received on August 12, 2019, by the Inspector 
General of the Intelligence Community should be transmitted immediately 
to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent 
   Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

    Resolved, That --
            (1) the whistleblower complaint received on August 12, 
        2019, by the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community 
        shall be transmitted immediately to the Select Committee on 
        Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee 
        on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and
            (2) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and 
        the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of 
        Representatives should be allowed to evaluate the complaint in 
        a deliberate and bipartisan manner consistent with applicable 
        statutes and processes in order to safeguard classified and 
        sensitive information.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CREENERGY Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David Calahasen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date:    October 20, 2010



By:      /s/ David Calahasen
         -------------------------------------
         David Calahasen
         President/Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JAIME GONZALEZ, §

No. 08-15-00187-CR

Appellant, §

Appeal from the

v. §

34th Judicial District Court

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS, of El Paso County, Texas

§

Appellee. (TC# 20110D03634)

§

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jaime Gonzalez attempts to appeal his convictions of possession of child pornography 

(Counts I - XVI). Finding that Appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal, we dismiss the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). In his response to our notice of intent to dismiss 

the appeal, Appellant indicates that the due date for the notice of appeal is calculated based upon 

the date the trial court signed the judgment of conviction. In a criminal case, a defendant’s 

notice of appeal is due within thirty days after the sentence is imposed in open court or the trial 

court enters an appealable order. See TEX.R.APP.P. 26.2(a)(1). The deadline is extended to 

ninety days after the date the sentence is imposed in open court if the defendant timely files a 

motion for new trial. See TEX.R.APP.P. 26.2(a)(2). The judgments of conviction reflect that the 
sentence for each count was imposed in open court on November 12, 2014. Appellant filed an 

untimely motion for new trial on May 25, 2015. Therefore, his notice of appeal was due to be 

filed no later than December 12, 2014, thirty days after the date sentence was imposed in open 

court. See TEX.R.APP.P. 26.2(a)(1). Appellant’s notice of appeal filed on June 18, 2015 is 

untimely. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

July 10, 2015

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)