alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      99.4**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Quarterly Report”) on the Form
      10-QSBA of Loma Verde Inc. (“Loma”) for the three months ended September 30,
      2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
      I, Virgilio Santana, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
      Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
      and belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Loma.









VIRGILIO
      SANTANA


Virgilio
      Santana


Chief
      Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director








-1-
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 60 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 60

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to restore 
            service standards in effect as of July 1, 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2019

 Mr. McKinley (for himself, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Joyce of Ohio, Mr. Tonko, 
 Mr. Young, and Ms. Gabbard) submitted the following resolution; which 
         was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
 States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to restore 
            service standards in effect as of July 1, 2012.

Whereas, on January 5, 2015, the United States Postal Service has implemented 
        lower ``service standards'' to virtually eliminate overnight delivery of 
        first class mail and periodicals, and further delay most other mail;
Whereas delayed mail negatively impacts businesses, hurts residents, rural 
        communities and the economy, and drives customers away, resulting in 
        lower revenue and worsens the Postal Service's financial situation; and
Whereas robust service standards implemented by the United States Postal Service 
        are essential to providing prompt and timely delivery of all mail: 
        Online purchases, local newspapers, newsletters, bill payments, letters, 
        invitations, packages, and medicines: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures 
to restore service standards in effect as of July 1, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
[980 NE2d 531, 956 NYS2d 482]

#### In the Matter of Robert P. Apple.

Decided November 29, 2012

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Thomas F. Purcell,*Mahopac, for Hon. Robert P Apple.

*Robert H. Tembeckjian,*New York City, for New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On consideration of the continuation of this Court’s October 23, 2012 suspension, with pay, of Honorable Robert P Apple from his office of Justice of the Pawling Village Court, Dutchess *918County *(see*19 NY3d 1045 [2012]), it is determined that the suspension continue, with pay, effective immediately.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott.
^uixl. i£-

CO

///CHA€i &,-^/o#a/s<?kI fjkH ~°° \7 J c. k/z Hl-olro~ij

REC'D IN COURT OF APPg

iSthjCourt of Appeal?I

CATHYE

•Kff&titf. MeGL£>j^i'CH,£fjzcp^rr ctc&k' cfrmyiusK -cLeou

/

.TyLC^ 7* 7S7 c 2

%£: / Pt£AS£ //£ZP*M&J*AU>f P'SAZLCQJ UJ&0*JG£Ltl &x*VicTto>S*-APP£Ai; #0.Hl-olSSsW/ £>£^\AL G>£ OuC PROCESS -1 LcCQAL tMAL !£'C?M.5/ ^po^Tco^SCL JHM£X>l/Titi} \

i\SQ&&> ^ Ca dAiC , JrJOi&t&Sr, : ^iLfoPA^srx &u/?ts aastk? flC&utJTACLUCrt 1

Cfcaaj^ucslLCs*^

KgA«v/ Ok) £7*W// (cP)^uRAL H£Mo7mm)iR3SStCfjl^7rt T&AikMATiC fto*An<tZ&Atkf Xu^&3X'&.

k//cLCt4TL^

^(^,lM^lM^r) gy Z/tdV Cm y, £*'tfa&AiJ£Laf-ALL6££ri \ZicTiW SiACjCj^,,J A>j

<77/f ^^Vfl^AJ6| flaa** /AjrftAt A«AuLr ¥suAs^p^s,^- xeue&Ai A&&t(lrs jo Mi HeA§

£*, ft,I^JA^i^^mp1 ot ALL MCSeJ /a/&£& ALL 7)-i&$L TyocuASfUrr ggfLdg*/«gQ e o^cc •

tJMs&fT'l ulCUAMAb LertE&Slt 7HCC&a&T, f^pQKT^fA$h2i

srAt4>~fti£c* coPtcsef Moneys 1 snftMi77g-Q:n? flggt/£ s'^vgesso^ eV^€^ccx>^ie'bl

&4*Po(+ia< £aKMo. Logical <zcAsck)/dl^jial dfbtrc^sc fcfiOJsic PiVc>/o^e>6tsr;#

.... • v \ // ^^

u-
*t<£Adirt£fUl.acccss-in ?&<?&&• l*1^ i iRRP&ljEZCL-) '£- ~£W'

>&ALLlJtJ!dAU£&<&>.L 1

GRou hi ft C, fo 2hlC^..l&iMjZ-CsidaT -Pease* y tipm

f~&A LK<d /

7C^TJSg..oT AocruSC^ /A>TO/7(C?*Ad£Y hJi-TVH^t r^ P®^\/j*+Jth4<=i /T^PG<3r\i*tL'T,t?Wl

jSeZL&crroTtf r£dulL^J A(ftCCctSd^ hAvC SfiAl^! £/>AW£o -D£^j,£r} 4^^9^TC "

&_-

J£a£e&_4j!8£j£.G&iGhi/\L MC^at * mc^ta^hcM'th t«tAfM&^r4 fttesai 1pt«^

&>U&TbJiThHeUs £X<icALPATo&i C^b&^ce ! Cou&r l&HoQ£A~ry£jJie,r\ tfAsJrsr-

/

S"P CRUCIAL M0 7(OAt$: PfcoSe<U4TuR 7L^iSTSQ'Bh^gA&<j£ fAc'7%TL> MAc\ZP.M&

/My \ttOlfs4T. 7£{AiA*<lA7iCM£A&1t fi-RA/A( S^&Ge&y ^/JtftCfeo M£*ITA\, HCACV:i |

l\i<zfp&Tt0h> Of C?o"uRT 7fr£ M^hiCT U/AS 5CC/DCQ <2v lOT.nQ.ik} **NA4h4*J&e

aGTUg US.Geo T ojiLI a/oT'.VC&MtT.CcfilV'sCTictA of AtW PaHScM aiilAuJTZS\ Tcsr,

yT^.s fAOLiJi oc^iy,,jc m& 1*iuq&jt L^al ^.p?Liei^L^^luzjumS-

<Zmc^€iy

^£C££H /^j3A£l-[uS. s/AYi (]fcl-y^-HU l'ICt?\(l c:c:a'l)
Order entered July 13, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00083-CR

CHAD ELDON HUDSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-51555-I

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On June 11, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings whether certain exhibits 

were admitted into evidence and, if so, whether the exhibits can be located and filed with the 

reporter’s record. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) the trial court admitted Defendant’s 

Exhibits nos. 1, 2, and 3 for record purposes only; (2) Defendant’s Exhibit no. 4 consisted of 

letters already included in the district clerk’s record and was admitted for all purposes; (3) the 

trial court was unable to determine who retained custody of the exhibits and the original exhibits 

cannot be located and produced; (4) appellant is not at fault for the loss of the exhibits; (5) the 

parties agree to the use of substituted exhibits; and (6) the State, while agreeing to the substituted 
exhibits, maintains its objection to the exhibits themselves. The reporter’s record, including the 

substituted exhibits has now been filed.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-G  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 8th day of January, 2003.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP II-G
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

s hould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________ No. 98-10978 Summary Calendar

_______________

MELVIN E. HEARN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS GREYHOUND LINE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:97-CV-1483-R)

_________________________ March 8, 1999 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

Melvin Hearn sued his employer under title VII, claiming race discrimination for the failure to promote him to the position of maintenance supervisor. Finding no genuine issue of material fact,
the district court entered summary judgment f or the employer and explained its ruling in a thorough memorandum opinion.
The court concluded that the employer's stated reason SS that other candidates for the job had superior q ualifications SS was not2

pretextual. Seeing no error in this reasoning on the basis of the record, we affirm, essentially for the reasons set forth by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
Opinion filed June 21 , 201 2



## In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________


### No. 11

- 12

- 00166

- CR

__________

IN RE ROBERT L. GREENE

Original Mandamus Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator, Robert L. Greene , has filed an application for writ of mandamus complaining of

Hon. Ralph H. Walton Jr.

, Judge of the 355 th District Court, with re spect to relator’s criminal
proceedings.

T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.221( b)(1) (West 2004 ) provides that e ach court of appeals
for a court of appeals district may issue all writs of mandamus, agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs, “against a judge of a district or county court in the cou rt of appeals

district.” Hood County is not in the Eleventh Court of Appeals District

. T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.201 ( l ) (West Supp. 2011 ). Instead, Hood County is in the Second Court of Appeals District.

See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.201( c ) (West Supp. 2011 ). Therefore, we do not have
jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against the Judge of the 355 th District Court of Hood
County

. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

June 21 , 2012 PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

P anel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Kalenak , J.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel DeJesus, Appellant.

Submitted February 11, 2013;

decided February 14, 2013

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
#### Melanie Kelley, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Alex Dustin Smith, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v Richard Schneck, Doing Business as Schneck Service & Installation and/or Schneck Appliance Service, Respondent.

Submitted June 24, 2013;

decided September 17, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Order entered July 8, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01497-CV

IN RE J.H. WALKER, INC. D/B/A J.H. WALKER TRUCKING, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-00661

ORDER

Before the Court is the unopposed motion of real parties in interest for a twenty-one day 

extension of time to file their response to the petition for writ of mandamus. We GRANT the 

motion. Real parties in interest shall file their response to the petition for writ of mandamus on 

or before August 5, 2015. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of Shawn Green, Appellant, v Mark L. Bradt, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Submitted June 18, 2012;

decided October 18, 2012

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*19 NY3d 802 (2012)].
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50306

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OLEGARIO SAAVEDRA-ROJAS, also known as Ricardo

Cordova-Valdez 

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-1968-ALL

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Olegario Saavedra-Rojas

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. UnitedStates, 523

U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision

and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A0 34 0 . J ADARRI US MI LLER v . THE STATE.

Th i s cas e was d o ck et ed by t h i s Co u rt o n Sep t em ber 2 1
, 2 0 2 1

. Th e Ap p el l an t ’ s b ri ef an d en u m erat i o n of erro rs were o ri g in al ly d ue o n Oct ob er 1 1
, 2 0 2 1

. On Oct o b er 5
, t h e A p p el l an t fi l ed a m ot i o n fo r ex t en s i o n o f t i m e. In an o rd er d at ed Oct o b er 1 3,
2 0 2 1
, we g ran t ed an ex t en s i o n u n t i l No v em b er 1 2
, 2 0 2 1

. As o f t he d at e o f t h i s o rd er,
t h e Ap p el l an t s t i l l h as n ot fi l ed a b ri ef an d en u m erat i o n o f erro rs

. Th e fi l i n g i s 1 1 5
d ay s l at e. Acco rd i n g l y , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y d eem ed ab an d o n ed a n d D I S M ISSED

p u rs u an t t o Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 2 3 (a). See al s o Co u rt o f Ap peal s Ru l e 1 3

.

Th e Cl erk o f Co u rt is DIRECTED t o s en d a co p y o f t hi s o rd er t o t h e Ap p el l an t

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. March 07, 2022

03/07/2022
----

| 1.     | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                             |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| Date:  February 12, 2010 | /s/  Edsel R.    Burns          |   |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |         Edsel R. Burns          |   |
|                               |         Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                               |                                      |   |
|                               |                                      |   |
| Date:  February 12, 2010 | /s/  Larry A.    Blount         |   |
|                               |         Larry A. Blount         |   |
|                               |         Chief Financial Officer |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of AdAl Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nicholas A.
Shrager, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                        /s/ Nicholas A. Shrager
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Nicholas A. Shrager
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)
                                        April 15, 2005


This Certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request. This written statement shall not be deemed to be "filed" as part
of the annual report on Form 10-KSB that it accompanies.


                                      F-30
#### In the Matter of James Holmes, Respondent, v Jana Winter, Appellant.

Submitted September 9, 2013;

decided September 12, 2013

Motion by Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and nine copies filed within seven days.
February 3, 2012 

Dear Tribal Advisory Committee Member: 

On behalf of the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC or Commission), we would like to 

thank each member of the Tribal Advisory Committee (TAC or Committee) for all of your 

efforts over the past four months. We are very grateful for your commitment to reviewing and 

providing recommendations for improving Part 547, Minimum Technical Standards for Gaming 

Equipment used with the Play of Class II Games and Part 543, Minimum Internal Control 

Standards for Class II Games. 

At the final in-person meeting on January 12, 2012, the Committee completed recommendations 

for Part 547. We have received the Committee’s final report and are in the process of reviewing 

those recommendations. The Committee also completed its final review of all sections for Part 

543 and made recommendations at that meeting as well. These are incredible accomplishments 

made well in advance of the anticipated completion date. We commend the Committee’s work 

and are thankful for the time and energy dedicated to this endeavor. 

Additionally, we received your January 12, 2012 and January 30, 2012 letters which raise 

valuable points that deserve additional explanation. At the conclusion of the November meeting, 

it was clear that the review of the material would be completed more quickly than either the 

Commission or the Committee originally anticipated. As such, the Commission determined that 

any remaining work could be completed through virtual meetings and other electronic means. In 

making our determination to adjust the February and March meetings, the Commission took into 

account a number of considerations. These included cost savings for all participants, the 

extraordinary progress made by the Committee in completing its recommendations, and an 

understanding that everyone has important responsibilities back home. 

As we have stated previously, the Commission applauds the dedication each of you have shown 

by participating in the important work of this Committee. We formed the Committee to draw on 

the expertise of tribal regulators to provide recommendations to the Commission as we review 

these standards. We also understand that many of you have chosen to meet in Tucson, AZ next 

week for further discussions. We look forward to receiving your final written report summarizing 

the completed review of Part 543 and respectfully request your recommendations be forwarded 

to the Commission no later than February 14, 2012. 
The Commission intends to fully review each recommendation and will carefully consider all 

information gathered as we move forward. As has been the practice of this Commission, we 

intend to conduct government-to-government tribal consultations on revisions proposed to Part 

543 and Part 547 as we progress. 

We thank you again for your commitment to this process. 

Sincerely, 

Tracie L. Stevens Steffani A. Cochran Daniel J. Little 

Chairwoman Vice-Chairwoman Associate Commissioner