Ul, Sis
THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

B.O. BOX 12208 CAPITOL STATION RECEIVED iN

AUSTIN TEXAS 78711 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
eee eee eee ee teen cee eeeeeeeee JUL 10 2018

x
x
EX: PARTE,
x Al Glerk
WILLIS DEWAYNE DOUGLAS x Tr. Ct. nel ae. ce Al AGRA
x RE, WR-41,516-03

WILLIS THE RELATOR.FILE LEAVE OF COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
AS. TO 067 DAYS ELAPSED-—NO?—FORWARDING SUCH
APPLICATION WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

‘THAT IT TAKE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
BY WRIT OF MANDAMUS

TC THE HONORABLE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

NOW COMES WILLIS. DEWAYNE DOUGLAS, the Relator, as Exparte, in the above en-
titled Writ of Mandamus, in Writ Humber: 41,516-03, as to 067 days elapsed in
respondent not forwarding the Application Writ of Habeas Corpus, as on timely
basis'., in the circumstances, the Court of Criminal Appeals, ordered that ad-
ditional facts were needed, shown as to the. following;

a.

Relator, by and through, his pleading of Ex Parte, will respect-
fully show this Honorable Court of Appeals, where it has been given
the original jurisdiction, as to the Honorable Clerk Nors, of the
for Writ 03/16/

66th Judicial District Court, as noted: Applicati
ile. --, aS noted by Gate..-..seeeeees

1. As to the Court's OrGer, .in submitting a copy of a timely filed
oréer which designates issues to be investigated. 2. It is shown by
date of 05/22/15, as to this Honorable Court's Order, there is an ...
oversight by error, by designating the issue of proof, as to the dis-
trict attorney's office served as date: 05/22/15.

3. See Case Menu: Dewayne Douglas Willis, Active: Filed Modified:
03:14 pm, on 05/22/15, by the Clerk Annette M. Nors;



(2)

If the Court Clerk, Honorable Nors, requested, by Order of the
Court of Criminal Appeals, that relator contends that he filed an
application for a writ of ‘habeas corpus in the 66th District Court
of Hill County, and more: than 35 days had elapsed, and the appli-
cation, and such application has not yet been forwarded to this..
Court.-, date of the order Filed: June 17, 2015;

4. It is shown, by the relator, to this Honorable Court of Criminal

Appeals, that the respondent, by date, has fail to file a timely is-

5. Additional facts, is not supported, or were not submitted, as
ordered by the Criminal Court of Appeals, an order designating issues
Pp £ the date the district attorney's office was served with the
2% z! a 3 veo

habeas application shall also be submitted with the response;

BASED ON RELATOR'S REQUEST OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
TAKING ORIGINAL JURISOTION BY WAY OF LEAVE FOR WRIT
A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Relator, Willis contends, as_a dispute, through material facts, that
the given Gate, 05/22/15, were not served to the district attorney's

office: pS. Served as back-dated.

How.can it'be, when ‘there is a.factual dispute, in existen, such

Gate cannot justify, date: 05/22/15-., when factual Gispute exists;

The factual Gispute is, that the Honorable Clerk, Ms. Nors, as re-
sponcent were not aware of such Court Order of 05/22/15, and could

not have known about relator filing a writ of mandamus with the Court

of Criminal Appeais; Which was (05/28/2015).-, on this Gate, writ of

mandamus were ceceived and presented to the Court. MOREOVER, the ap-

plication for a writ of habeas corpus, was filed: 03/16/15, a 102 days.


(

The dispute is as to the Respondent, District Clerk of Hill County
being ordered to file a response-.-.; and submitting a copy of a timely
filed orGer which Gesignates issues to be investigated, how is it that
such order was followed, when. the respondent, Clerk filed/submittedé
the Gate, before the Court of Criminal Appeals, handed. down .it's Order
pursuant to the Gate of receiving the original application for writ of

mandamus;

As to the Court's Orcer, Respondent filed it's response, which were

May the 22, 2015;

May the 28, 2015, 6 days later, relator file with the Court of Criminal

Appeals, upon leave to file a writ of mandamus;

THEREAFTER, June 17, 2015, is when respondent, the Clerk of Hill County

was ordered to file a response: which Gesignates issues to be investi-
gated: Again were filed: June 17, 2015.

It is to nete, that relator maybe in error, as to the dates, but as
was submitted, the date has been given and submitted an inappropriate
Gate, as to serving the district attorney's office.

WHEREFORE, RELATOR, EX PARTE, WILLIS DEWAYNE DOUGLAS, by and through
pro se, respectfully prays of this Honorable Court of Appeals, to take
criginal jurisdiction of investigation of the application, of writ of
habeas corpus, through writ of mandamus, WR-41,516-03-; and in all
things granted-

Signed the.3.rd day of July, 2015. Respectfully Submitted

ahh bee.

Pro-Se/ExParte