alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 121 (Thursday, June 25, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30249-30250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14927]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Parts 1 and 31

[REG-146893-02, REG-115037-00, REG-138603-03]
RIN 1545-BI78, 1545-BI80, 1545-BI79


Treatment of Services Under Section 482; Allocation of Income and 
Deductions From Intangibles; Stewardship Expense; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to a notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (REG-146893-02, REG-115037-00, and REG-138603-03) that was 
published in the Federal Register, on Friday, August 4, 2006 (71 FR 
44247) providing guidance regarding the treatment of controlled 
services transactions under section 482 and the allocation of income 
from intangibles, in particular with respect to contributions

[[Page 30250]]

by a controlled party to the value of an intangible owned by another 
controlled party, and modifying the regulations under section 861 
concerning stewardship expenses to be consistent with the changes made 
to the guidance under section 482.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning REG-146893-02 and REG-
115037-03, Carol B. Tan or Gregory A. Spring, (202) 435-5265; 
Concerning REG-138603-03, Richard L. Chewning, (202) 622-3850 (not 
toll-free numbers).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-146893-02, REG-115037-00 and 
REG-138603-03) that is the subject of this document is under sections 
482, 861, 6038, 6662, and 3121 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-146893-02, 
REG-115037-00, and REG-138603-03) contains regulation identification 
numbers (RINs) that must be corrected.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking 
(REG-146893-02, REG-115037-00, and REG-138603-03), which was the 
subject of FR Doc. 06-6674, is corrected as follows:
    On page 44247, in the document heading, the language ``RIN 1545-
BB31, 1545-AY38, 1545-BC52'' is corrected to read ``RIN 1545-BI78, 
1545-BI80, 1545-BI79''.

LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. E9-14927 Filed 6-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Norex Petroleum Limited, Appellant, v Leonard Blavatnik et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 17, 2013;

decided September 12, 2013

*1063Motion by Thomas D. Rowe, Jr., et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed.
CAS - EX 10.37 - 6.30.2013 - Tiffany Separation Agrmt


Exhibit 10.37


HAND DELIVERY


To: Blain Tiffany


From: Scott Dolan


Date: April 26, 2013


Re: "Good Reason" Resignation


I have reviewed your latest proposal to resolve our dispute regarding your claim of "Good Reason" termination under your Severance Agreement.  In a final attempt to resolve this matter amicably, I propose the following:


		
	•
	You would continue on the payroll as an employee until June 1, 2013 ("Termination Date"), but would resign as an officer effective April 29, 2013, and be available as needed thereafter to assist with any transition matters until your Termination Date (up to a maximum of 40 hours per week).




		
	•
	You would receive all benefits you would otherwise be entitled to under your Severance Agreement for Good Reason termination, except that: (i) you will receive a lump sum severance payment equal to 5 months' base pay (instead of one year); and (ii) permitted use of the Company-leased car shall be limited to 5 months from the Termination Date, or such earlier date as you commence employment with another employer.  All of the other terms and conditions in the Severance Agreement would continue to apply, including the delivery of a valid release as a condition of payment.




		
	•
	Effective upon your resignation as an officer on April 29, 2013, you would be relieved from the executive stock ownership guidelines.




		
	•
	You would receive your $62,500 cash retention bonus upon its scheduled vesting date of June 1, 2013, but you would forfeit the remaining restricted stock portion of your retention bonus which would have otherwise vest on December 31, 2014.




To accept this proposal, you must indicate your acceptance by signing this memo in the space provided below and delivering it to me no later than 5:00 p.m. (Central Time) on Friday, April 26, 2013.  If this proposal is not accepted prior to that time, it will expire by its terms and be of no further force or effect.


Nothing in this memo should be construed as an admission by the Company, or a waiver of any rights or defenses the Company may have under the Severance Agreement or otherwise.




	
			
	 
	Sincerely,
	 

	 
	/s/ Scott J. Dolan
	 

	 
	Scott J. Dolan
	 

	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 

	 
	 
	 

	Seen and Accepted:
	 
	 

	/s/ Blain A. Tiffany
	 
	4/26/2013

	Blain A. Tiffany
	 
	Date

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 















E-1
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00168-CV

G. N. E.-A., a/k/a G. N. E., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 

NO. D-1-FM-13-001449, THE HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due to be filed on 

March 31, 2014. LaDelle Abilez requested an extension of time to file the reporter’s record.

Any extensions of time granted for the filing of the reporters’ records may not 

exceed 30 days cumulatively. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(2). Accordingly, LaDelle Abilez is 

hereby ordered to file the reporter’s record in this case on or before April 17, 2014. If the record 

is not filed by that date, Abilez may be required to show cause why she should not be held in 

contempt of court.

It is ordered on April 9, 2014.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (124,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (63,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (63,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (63,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Order issued November ~ 0 ,2012

In The

(£ourt of o ppeals

 fih i tri t of at aIlaa

No. 05-12-01554-CV

WALTER MITCHELL, Appellant

VQ

DALLAS COUNTY, ET AL., Appellees

ORDER

We DENY as moot appellant’s November 15, 2012 motion for an extension of time to file

a notice of appeal. Appellant’s notice of appeal was timely filed on November 15, 2012.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





The Board of Directors
FirstFed Financial Corp.:





We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (No.
333-33463;033-63207) on Form S-8 of FirstFed Financial Corp. of our report dated
January 29, 2003, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition
of FirstFed Financial Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and
the related  consolidated  statements of operations and comprehensive  earnings,
stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the  years in the  three-year
period ended  December 31, 2002,  which report  appears in the December 31, 2002
annual report on Form 10-K of FirstFed Financial Corp.


                                 KPMG LLP





Los Angeles, California
March 11, 2003
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orient Paper, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Winston C. Yen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 

| Date: February 1, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Winston C. Yen                                            |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |  

Winston C. Yen

Chief Financial Officer 

(principal financial andaccounting officer)                                                                                                                                                                                        |

 

9

----
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------



                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William E. Saxelby, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

      i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of
            operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



                              /s/ William E. Saxelby
                              ----------------------------------------
                              William E. Saxelby
                              President & Chief Executive Officer



February 7, 2008
#### In the Matter of James R. Mercer Jr., Petitioner, v Superintendent of the Livingston Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[976 NYS2d 898]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of damaging state property. The Attorney General has informed this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination has been administratively reversed, references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see *Matter of Oliver v Fischer,*107 AD3d 1276, 1277 [2013]; *Matter of Canales-Sanchez v Schneiderman, 107*AD3d 1258, 1259 [2013]).

Rose, J.P., Lahtinen, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00226-CR

STEPHEN KENNETH LANE SELLERS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-2242-C1

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed June 4, 2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

          - 38 CFR Part 1

### CFR Correction

In Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 0 to 17, revised as of July 1, 2008, on page 91, in § 1.911, remove paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(4).

[FR Doc. E9-14689 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wniteb ~tate~ ~ourt of ~peaI~ 

for tbe jf eberaI ~ircuit 

ST. CLAIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 

CONSULTANTS, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. 

AND MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC CORPORATION OF 

AMERICA, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

JVC AMERICAS CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

NOKIA CORPORATION AND NOKIA, INC., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

PALM, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

KYOCERA WIRELESS CORPORATION AND 

KYOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 
ST. CLAIR INTELLECTUAL v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

VIVITAR CORPORATION, PETTERS GROUP 

WORLDWIDE, LLC, POLAROID CONSUMER 

ELECTRONICS, LLC, POLAROID HOLDING 

COMPANY, AND POLAROID CORP., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

HTC CORPORATION, HTC (BVI) CORP" AND HTC 

AMERICA, INC., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND 

RESEARCH IN MOTION LTD. AND RESEARCH IN 

MOTION CORP., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

2012-1348, -1349, -1350 

2 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in case nos. 04-CV-1436, 06-CV-0404, 

and 08-CV-0371, Judge Leonard P. Stark. 

ON MOTION 

Before LOURIE, SCHALL and DYK, Circuit Judges. 

LOURIE, Circuit Judge. 

ORDER. 

Defendants-Appellees move to dismiss these appeals 

for lack of jurisdiction and move for fees and costs. St. 
3 ST. CLAIR INTELLECTUAL v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC 

Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. (St. Clair") 

does not oppose the dismissal without prejudice to refiling 

after entry of final judgment but opposes costs and fees. 

Defendants-Appellees reply. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion is granted to the extent that the appeals are dismissed as premature. 

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

AUG 032012 

Date 

FOR THE COURT 

lsi Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

cc: Dominic E. Massa, Esq. 

s25 

Mark Andrew Woodmansee, Esq. 

Huan-Yi Lin, Esq. 

Robert Francis Perry, Esq. 

Ralph Terrance Rader, Esq. 

Charlene M. Morrow, Esq. 

John G. Day, Esq. 

Richard de Bodo, Esq. 

Jack B. Blumenfeld, Esq. 

ISSUED AS MANDATE: _A_U_G_0_3_2_012 __ 

u.s. couJtan.~ FOR 

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

AUG 03 ZOlZ 

JANHORBALY 

ClERK
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 15, 2016

jam 

# Order

Clerk August 15, 2016

1 54094

MICHAEL RICHARD KAUFMAN

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 1 54094

C O A: 331756

CHIPPEWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

WARDEN and DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Defendant s

- Appellee s

.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff

- appellant having failed to pay the

partial filing fee as required by the order of July 20, 2016 , the Clerk of the Court is

hereby d irected to close this file.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies,
Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Q/A for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Martin S Smiley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s/ Martin S.
SmileyMartin S .Smiley Chief Financial Officer

June 4, 2010

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51348

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE REMEDIOS MENDIETA-JIMENEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:07-CR-1805-ALL

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Remedios MendietaJimenez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a

penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 4, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51348

2

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# Cooperative Agreements

> handshakeWhat is a cooperative agreement?In certain instances, NINDS may opt to use a cooperative agreement mechanism, rather than a grant, to support research where there is a significant need for active collaboration between investigators and NINDS staff.

### Features of Cooperative Agreements

              - Cooperative agreements are indicated by a “U” in the activity code or mechanism (e.g. U01, U54).
              - Participation from NINDS staff in cooperative agreements most often comes via the inclusion of an NINDS Project Scientist on a cooperative agreement in addition to an NINDS Program Officer.
              - An NINDS Project Scientist can be considered as part of the investigator team, and can be involved in activities such as designing research protocols and interpreting results as well as overall oversight and management of a project.  
> 
The involvement and role(s) of NINDS staff as part of a cooperative agreement will be outlined in section VI of the notice of funding opportunity (usually under a heading labeled “Cooperative Agreement Terms and Conditions of Award”) as well as in Section IV of the terms and conditions in your Notice of Award. 

### Commonly used NINDS Cooperative Agreement Mechanisms

> commentFor Questions about Cooperative AgreementsContact the "Scientific Contact" listed at the bottom of the Notice of Funding Opportunity ("Section VII. Agency Contacts") you are considering.

>