alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                MAY-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     MAY-28-1998
<CASH>                           271,709
<SECURITIES>                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                    1,193,619
<ALLOWANCES>                     0
<INVENTORY>                      483,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 2,383,135
<PP&E>                           7,433,750
<DEPRECIATION>                   5,622,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   5,686,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            4,220,972
<BONDS>                          0
<COMMON>                         1,009,230
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<OTHER-SE>                       (275,037)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     5,686,109
<SALES>                          19,205,078
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 19,205,078
<CGS>                            15,448,309
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    3,454,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               377,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (75,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (75,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0 
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     (75,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (.10)

        

</TABLE>
#### Ashelie Seye et al., Plaintiffs, v Ralph Sibbio, Respondent, et al., Defendant. McGivney & Kluger, P.C., Nonparty Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 473]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., McGivney & Kluger, EC., the attorney of record for the defendant Ralph Sibbio, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hinds-Radix, J.), dated January 9, 2006, which denied its motion for leave to withdraw as his counsel.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“It is settled law in this State that a motion to withdraw as counsel is a poor vehicle to test an insurer’s right to disclaim liability or deny coverage” *(Monaghan v Meade,*91 AD2d 1014, 1015 [1983]; *see Brothers v Burt,*27 NY2d 905, 906 [1970]; *Rusolo v Skate Odyssey,*109 AD2d 875 [1985]; *cf. Dillon v Otis El. Co.,*22 AD3d 1 [2005]). Rather “[t]he appropriate vehicle for resolving a dispute over the coverage offered by a policy is a declaratory judgment action in which the [insured] would be able to adequately litigate the facts of the insurance carrier’s disclaimer” *(Pryer v DeMatteis Orgs.,*259 AD2d 476, 477 [1999]; *609*see Sojka v 43 Wooster LLC,*19 AD3d 266, 267 [2005]; *Garcia v Zito,*242 AD2d 258, 259 [1997]; *Laura Accessories v A.P.A. Warehouses,*140 AD2d 182 [1988]). Adams, J.P, Krausman, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3478 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3478

To amend title 46, United States Code, to repeal certain limitations of 
                   liability and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 2010

Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mr. Leahy, and Mr. Whitehouse) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 46, United States Code, to repeal certain limitations of 
                   liability and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Remuneration for Ecological and 
Societal Tolls Occasioned by Reckless Errors Act'' or the ``RESTORE 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF LIMITATION OF LIABILITY.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 305 of title 46, United States Code, is 
amended by striking sections 30503, 30504, 30505, 30506, 30507, 30511, 
and 30512.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 30502 of title 46, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``(except section 30503)''.
    (c) Table of Sections Amendment.--The table of sections in chapter 
305 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking the items 
related to sections 30503, 30504, 30505, 30506, 30507, 30511, and 
30512.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 2 shall take effect as if enacted on 
April 15, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
# Accomplishing the Mission

NIMH developed the Strategic Plan for Research to advance the institute’s mission and guide research over a five-year period. The sections of this plan specifically address areas of crucial importance as NIMH strives to accomplish its mission. First, Challenges and Opportunities confronts the challenges that may lie ahead and describes some of the unique opportunities for scientific exploration to overcome these challenges and advance the understanding of mental illnesses. Second, Cross-Cutting Research Themes are topics that are integral to the Goals of the Strategic Plan for Research and will influence the direction of mental health research as we move forward. Finally, the four Goals of the Strategic Plan for Research form a broad roadmap for the institute’s research priorities, beginning with the fundamental science of the brain and behavior, and extending through evidence-based services that improve public health outcomes. Each of the four Goals include Objectives, followed by Strategies, which include research areas of specific interest that will help drive progress toward achieving our mission. The topics throughout the plan are not exhaustive. Prior to submitting an application, investigators are encouraged to contact NIMH program staff to discuss proposed aims and relevance to NIMH’s Goals and overall priorities.

NIMH will assess and monitor its performance in achieving the Goals presented in this plan by gathering and analyzing metrics associated with its core mission. Findings will be integrated to inform and refine the direction of the plan over time. The institute will share these findings and updates to the plan with stakeholders regularly, such as through NIMH's Strategic Plan Progress Reports.

In the context of prioritizing excellent science, the overall strategy for funding science is to support a broad spectrum of both investigator-initiated and institute-solicited research across the NIMH portfolio. Full implementation of the NIMH Strategic Plan for Research will help transform the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of mental illnesses.

NIMH envisions a world in which mental illnesses are prevented and cured.

To transform the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses through basic and clinical research, paving the way for prevention, recovery, and cure.

Updated:  May 2023
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 117 (Friday, June 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14538]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: [74 FR 28293, June 
15, 2009]

Status: Closed Meeting.

Place: 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting: Friday, June 19, 2009 at 
11 a.m.

Change in the Meeting: Additional Item.
    The following item has been added to the Friday, June 19, 2009 
Closed Meeting agenda: Formal Order of Investigation.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(c)(3), (5), (7) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), 
(5), (7) and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the 
Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, determined that Commission 
business required the above change and that no earlier notice thereof 
was possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: June 16, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-14538 Filed 6-17-09; 11:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 13, 2015

No. 04-14-00557-CR

Shamar Jerrell JOHNSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR6088

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s Agreed Motion for Issuance of Expedited Mandate is GRANTED. We 

ORDER the Clerk of this Court to issue the mandate as soon as possible.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
altimo_ex103.htm


EXHIBIT 10.3


 


Amended and Restated Lease Agreement


 


This Amended and Restated Lease Agreement, dated as of 26 June, 2013, hereby amends and restates in its entirety the Lease Agreement entered into on March 2, 2013 between Leszek Piekut (the “Lesser”) and Altimo Group Corp. (the “Lessee”).







The following sets forth the agreement of the parties hereto with regard to the lease by Lesser to Lessee of the Leased Premises:


 



	
1.

	
The Leased Premises area covers approximately 6 (six) square meters. The Leased Premises is located on the first floor of the building at St. Rynek Staromiejski 36/38, Bydgoszcz, 85-001, Poland.







 



	
2.

	
The Agreement shall be for a term of three (3) years, starting on March 2, 2013 and ending on March 2, 2016.







 



	
3.

	
Lessee has the option to renew the lease term for an additional term of two (2) years by giving the Lesser written notice on or before ninety (90) days before the expiration of the term of this lease. The renewal lease is to be upon the same terms, covenants, and conditions contained in this Lease except as to rent as provided in Section 4 below, which shall be negotiated by the parties prior to any renewal term hereof.







 



	
4.

	
The annual rent for the term of the lease shall be $3,600 plus applicable taxes payable in advance on the first day of every month, and shall be paid in twelve (12) equal and consecutive installments of $300 each plus applicable taxes.







 



	
5.

	
A late charge of $10 per day shall be paid as additional rental for any rental payment delivered or received more than three (3) days after the first day of any calendar month during the term of this lease. 







 



	
6.

	
Lessor agrees to provide, at its expense, to or for the Leased Premises, adequate heat, electricity, water, air conditioning, ventilation, replacement light tubes, trash removal service, and sewage disposal service, in such quantities and at such times as is necessary to Lessee's comfortable and reasonable use of the Leased Premises.







 



	
8.

	
Any holding over after the expiration of the term of this lease shall be deemed to constitute a tenancy from month to month only, and shall be on the same terms and conditions as specified in this Lease.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the date and year first above written 


 



	
LESSOR:

	  
	  	  	  
	
By:

	


	  
	  	
Leszek Piekut

	  
	  	  	  
	
LESSEE:

	  
	  	  	  
	
ALTIMO GROUP CORP.

	  
	  	  	  
	
By:

	


	  
	  	
Marek Tomaszewski, President
97-398.

#### State ex rel. Simms v. Brown.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E, Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
96-2015.

#### In re Resignation of Wilson.

IT IS ORDERED by this court, *sua sponte,*effective May 7, 1997, that William Thomas Wilson, Attorney Registration No. 0033182, last known address in Toledo, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of October 10, 1996, to wit: failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before November 12,1996.
March 6, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ORANGE ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00061-CV

THE CITY OF ORANGE, TEXAS AND SHAWN OUBRE, IN HIS OFFICIAL 

CAPACITY AS ORANGE CITY MANAGER, Appellees

_______________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, The City of 

Orange, Texas and Shawn Oubre, in his official capacity as Orange City Manager, 

signed December 7, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the 

judgment of the court below REVERSED and RENDER judgment compelling 

arbitration.

We further REMAND the cause for further proceedings regarding the City’s

fee request.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------



                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William E. Saxelby, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                    /s/  William E. Saxelby
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    William E. Saxelby
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer


February 6, 2009
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 3I

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

    Under Section 14A:9-4(3) of Title 14A, Corporations, General, of the
New Jersey Statutes, the undersigned does hereby amend the Certificate of
Incorporation of mPhase Technologies, Inc. as follows:

    1.  Amendment:

    The authorized shares of the Corporation are hereby changed to 150,000,000
shares, no par value, from 50,000,000 shares, no par value, by deleting
Paragraph 4 of the Certificate of Incorporation, as corrected, which reads as
follows:

        "4. THE AGGREGATE NUMBER OF SHARES WHICH THE CORPORATION SHALL HAVE
    AUTHORITY TO ISSUE IS 50,000,000, NO PAR VALUE." and inserting in place
    thereof:

        "4. THE AGGREGATE NUMBER OF SHARES WHICH THE CORPORATION SHALL HAVE
    AUTHORITY TO ISSUE IS 150,000,000, NO PAR VALUE."

    2.  Date of Adoption:

    The date of the adoption of this Amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation by the Shareholders was May 5, 2000.

    3.  Number of Shares Outstanding and Entitled to Vote:

    The number of shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to
vote on the adoption of this Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation was
TWENTY-EIGHT MILLION ONE HUNDRED FOUR THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE
(28,104,825) shares.

    4.  Number of Shares Voted:

    The number of shares of capital stock of the Corporation which voted for the
adoption of said Amendment was 14,478,469 shares and the number of shares voted
against the adoption of said Amendment was 435,755 shares. Shares not voting
were 13,190,601 shares.

    The undersigned as President of the above Corporation has signed this
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation this 31st day of
August, 2000.

<TABLE>
<S>                                            <C>
ATTEST:                                        MPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                               s/ RONALD A. DURANDO
/s/ ROBERT H. JAFFE                            --------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------   Ronald A. Durando
Robert H. Jaffe                                President
Assistant Secretary
</TABLE>
I

Picayune Rancheria

of the

CHUKCHANSI INDIANS

46575 Road 417 Coarsegold, CA 93614 (559) 683-6633 FAX (559) 683-0599

RESOLUTION

NO.2003-41

A Resolution Repealing Section 4.17.17 of the Picayune Rancheria of the

Chukchansi Indians Class II and III Gaming Ordinance of 2001

and Submitting such Repeal to the NIGC

WHEREAS, the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians is a sovereign federally

recognized tribe as established pursuant to the Constitution of the Picayune

ReservatiOn; and

WHEREAS, the Tribal Council of the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians is the

governing body of the Tribe pursuant to Article IV, Section 2 of the Tribal

Constitution; and

WHEREAS, the Tribal Council of the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians is

authorized by the Tribal Constitution, Article V, Section 4, to enact laws and

codes for the Tribe; and

WHEREAS, we the duly elected Tribal Council of the Picayune Ranchena of the Chukchansi

Indians are entrusted with the preservation of our cultural values, and promotion

of the general welfare of the Picayune Rancheria; and

WHEREAS, the protection, safety and welfare of all persons, including, but not limited to, the

preservation of education, economic and employment opportunities, and

preservation of cultural and natural resources, within Tribal jurisdiction of the

Picayune Rancheria, are primary goals and objectives of the Tribal Council; and

WHEREAS, the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians has considered, at a duly called

Tribal Council Meeting, the contents of Section 4.17.17 of the Picayune

Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians Gaming Ordinance of 2001 (hereinafter

Tribal Gaming Ordinance); and

WHEREAS, the Tribal Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the Tribe to

repeal SeŁtion 4.17.17 of such Tribal Gaming Ordinance;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi

Indians Tribal Council hereby repeals Section 4.17.17 of the Tribal Gaming

Ordinance, and the Tribal Chairperson is authorized to execute all documents

necessary to implement this Resolution;

I
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Picayune Rancheria of the

Chukchansi Indians Tribal Council hereby authorizes the submission of the Tribal

Gaming Ordinance reflecting this amendment, along with this Resolution to the

National Indian Gaming Commission for its approval forthwith.

C*E*R*T*I*F*I*C*A*T*I*O*N

This will certify that the foregoing resolution was considered at a meeting of the Tribal

Council of the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians, duly called on the (day of

September 2003, and was adopted by a vote of for, ~ against, and ? abstentions.

A quorum of (~ was presen~,. .L t~L5r~.4

Dated this _____

day of September 2003

A~e~

Dixie Jackson~hairperson

Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians

ATTEST:

c~~i~I2

Tribal Secretary

TRIBAL COUNCIL

RECEIVED:

Chairman

NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

2
#### Shawn Green, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 112892.)

Submitted July 9, 2012;

decided October 18, 2012

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*19 NY3d 805 (2012)].
EXHIBIT 32.1

32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
G. Flanigan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that to my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                                 /s/  Joseph G. Flanigan
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 Name:  Joseph G. Flanigan
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Date:  January 12, 2004


                                      -35-
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fearless International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Carol Stephan, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
Date: 	 	February 14, 2007 	 	 	 	By: 	 	/s/ Carol Stephan 	 	 	Name: 	 	Carol Stephan 	 	 	Title: 	 	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Latipac Corp., Appellant, v BMH Realty LLC et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 27, 2012;

decided October 30, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### In the Matter of Easylink Services International, Inc., Appellant, v New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal et al., Respondents.

Submitted July 1, 2013;

decided September 3, 2013

Motion by Institute for Professionals in Taxation for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein dismissed as academic.