alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------



                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William E. Saxelby, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



                                    /s/  William E. Saxelby
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    William E. Saxelby
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer


August 8, 2007
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies,
Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Q/A for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Martin S Smiley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s/ Martin S.
SmileyMartin S.Smiley Chief Financial Officer

April 21, 2010

---
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SCHEDULE 
 Overview  

A summary of our annual non-employee director compensation is provided below: 

 

					
	 Board Retainer
	 	$	 60,000	  
	 Chairman’s Retainer
	 	$	100,000	(1)
	 Meeting Fees
	 	 
  
	No separate fees for board or
 committee meetings
	  
   

	 Committee Retainer
	 			
	 Audit
	 	$	12,000	  
	 Compensation
	 	$	10,000	  
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance
	 	$	10,000	  
	 Committee Chair Retainer
	 			
	 Audit
	 	$	7,500	  
	 Compensation
	 	$	7,500	  
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance
	 	$	7,500	  
	 Equity Awards
	 			
	 Stock Options
	 	$	70,000	(2)
	 Restricted Stock Units
	 	$	70,000	(3)

  

	(1) 	 The Chairman’s retainer includes, and is not in addition to, the standard board retainer. 



	(2) 	 Upon being elected or continuing as a director, each non-employee director will receive such number of restricted stock units as is determined by
dividing $70,000 by the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. 



	(3) 	 Upon being elected or continuing as a director, each non-employee director will receive a stock option having $70,000 in value. The number of shares
for which the option may be exercised will be determined by dividing $70,000 by a binomial valuation of an option of one share of our common stock on the grant date. 


 Vesting  
 Stock options and restricted stock units will vest 100% on the earlier of
(i) the first anniversary of the grant date or (ii) immediately prior to the first annual meeting of shareholders following the grant date. 
 Deferred Compensation Plan  
 We have a non-employee director deferred compensation
plan. This plan allows directors to defer all or a part of their cash retainers until their service on the board ends. Based on the deferral election, the director is credited with a number of share units which are equivalent to shares of our common
stock with no voting rights. Upon cessation of service on the board, the director receives a share of common stock for each share unit in a lump sum distribution. 
 Restricted stock units are hypothetical shares of our common stock that are settled in shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis upon vesting. Under the deferred compensation plan, directors may defer
receipt of shares issuable pursuant to the restricted stock units until their service on the board ends.
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-A  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 14th day of November, 2005.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-A
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income Limited  Partnership  II-A and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership  II-A and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6816

ROBERT BIGGS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NURSE CARTWRIGHT; MR. WEEKS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

WILLIAM C. MEADOWS; SUPERINTENDENT BARNES,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-93-17-BR)

Submitted: September 10, 1996 Decided: September 24, 1996

Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Biggs, Appellant Pro Se. James Peeler Smith, Assistant

Attorney General, David L. Woodard, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Biggs v.

Cartwright, No. CA-93-17-BR (E.D.N.C. May 10, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

BI INCORPORATED, GEO CARE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2014-1266

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Colorado in No. 1:11-cv-00301-DME-CBS, 

Senior Judge David M. Ebel.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JON TREMBATH, Lathrop & Gage LLP, Denver, CO, 

argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by

PHILLIP S. LORENZO, JAMES ESPY DALLNER, ALEXANDER C.

CLAYDEN, ALLISON STEINCIPHER WALLIN. 

 TIMOTHY P. GETZOFF, Holland & Hart LLP, Boulder, 

CO, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by

MICHAEL P. MANNING, Holland & Hart LLP, Billings, MT.

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and 

MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 July 13, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
#### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Deon T. GANTT, Chad M. Carrico, Wilfredo Barrios, and Jose R. Vigil, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 03-2299, 03-3167, 03-3765, 04-1238.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

June 23, 2006.

*677Bradley Blackington, Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John A. Goodridge, Barbara Coyle Williams, Olsen, Labhart, White & Hambidge, Evansville, IN, Chad E. Groves, Wilson Womack & Groves, Henderson, KY, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, and Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

We ordered a limited remand to ask whether the district judge, had he known the sentencing guidelines were advisory, would have imposed the same sentence on Deon Gantt, Chad Carrico, Wilfredo Barrios, and Jose Vigil. *See United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); *United States v. Paladino,*401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir.2005). He answered that he would.

We invited the parties to respond, and the defendants did in a consolidated manner. The defendants summarily ask us to revisit all of the issues previously raised in their appeals, which we will not do. The defendants also claim — without elaboration or support — that “the district court abused its discretion in light of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553.” We will uphold sentences on *Paladino*remand if the district judge gave “meaningful consideration” to the statutory factors. *United States v. Williams,*425 F.3d 478, 480 (7th Cir.2005). Here, the court issued a separate order for each defendant, and in each instance the district court reaffirmed its sentencing rationale. Because each of the sentences were within properly calculated guidelines ranges, they are presumptively reasonable. *United States v. Mykytiuk,*415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir.2005). The defendants do not articulate a challenge to the reasonableness of their sentences, and we see no basis for error. The sentences are Affirmed.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

OFF I (!;\9\~0~l!J~~~~l:}E>L ~T,:, TION··A' :f..INy~S e..~3. fhOSTAGE)>) PITNEY BOWES 

STATE OF TEXAS ·",zt.·:~~;'::', ((~~~ ~~IJ~§? PENAL TV FOR . <!:~'·<:.i~~rc,, ~ == 

PRIVATE USE ::;1~;;:~ • .,/'fff;t···< r. .. &~ ;~701 $ (0)(0)(0).215 

~~'-="""'""· 0001401623JUN. 25. 2015 

G/24/2015 ~~t1; s~1L6e?. ~r~~ \\ . SI~~S, JON~THAN cn:i'Tlf~~:~·~.t.~~~[~~~~;~R. . yvR-83,339-01\ 

This 1s to advise that the"f~·ourt-has!de,pie.a::-""'ttb~lilh'!'Jt1tte,Q_fPrder motion for leave to 

f

. I th . . I I' . t'= !\·f"" ..... 'X""·t~~· ~'i>I'~;J« .. ltl. ~~1 V.PJ A. 1 e e ong1na ap~&aJ.2.r:!1.§rtWmne>.~a~uam.,y,s:,.,W~ OFF1Cl~ 

HARJ.US COUNT~{-..g~u.I=1_ ,:, ·-· Abel Acosta, Clerk 

r·~3B 77002 "II ill II '1 HFI'4iii I I II . · ... ·.· ~ · .·.·· :,,,.·_. ~ .·. ·1 ~ ·,•I" 

' . ' \ 

\. \ 

' \ 

'/ 

\
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 121 (Thursday, June 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14910]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5311-N-03]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Capital Fund Recovery 
Competition Grants; Correction to Deadline in June 9, 2009 Federal 
Register Notice

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian 
Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 9, 2009, HUD published a notice in the Federal 
Register (74 FR 27340) to announce that a revised version of the 
Capital Fund Recovery Competition (CFRC) NOFA had been issued and 
posted to the HUD website. That brief notice stated that the deadline 
date for Category 4 (Creation of Energy Efficient, Green Communities) 
applications is July 29, 2009. In fact, the correct deadline date for 
Category 4 applications is July 21, 2009. The July 21, 2009 deadline 
date for Category 4 applications is correctly stated in the revised 
CFRC NOFA posted on HUD's Web site on June 3, 2009. While the 
requirements for submitting an application for this assistance are 
those provided in the CFRC NOFA, HUD is using today's Federal Register 
notice to avoid any confusion in its applicant community.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have a question or need a 
clarification, you may contact the Office of Capital Improvements by 
sending an email message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#efbfa6a7a0aca6af879a8bc1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d6d7475727e747d554859135a524b">[email protected]</span></a>. Please see http://www.hud.gov/offices/pih/programs/ph/capfund/ocir.cfm, which can be 
accessed from http://www.hud.gov/recovery/, for the revised CFRC NOFA 
and additional information.

    Dated: June 19, 2009.
Aaron Santa Anna,
Assistant General Counsel for Regulations.
[FR Doc. E9-14910 Filed 6-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5210-67-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 21.1

VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

SUBSIDIARIES (ALL 100% Owned)



|                                    |  |                              
|----------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiaries of the Registrant      |  | Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
|Ventana Medical Systems, GmbH       |  | Germany                      
|Ventana Medical Systems, Japan K.K. |  | Japan                        
|Ventana Medical Systems, Ltd.       |  | United Kingdom               
|Ventana Medical Systems, Pty. Ltd.  |  | Australia                    
|Ventana Medical Systems, S.A.       |  | France                       
|Wattle Ventures Pty. Ltd.           |  | Australia
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P (the
“Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Randall H. Breitenbach, Co-Chief Executive Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLC, the
general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.





/s/ RANDALL H.
  BREITENBACHRandall
      H. BreitenbachCo-Chief
      Executive Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLCDated:  November
      6, 2009
97-598.

#### State ex rel. Spillman v. Dept. of Pub. Safety, Div. of Police, Pub. Records Unit.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss *1511sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of

INDEPENDENT BANCSHARES, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Independent BancShares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Mark A. Imes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Nicholas J. Panicaro, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the financial statements included in such Report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      |  |  |  |                         
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|/s/ Mark A. Imes                      |  |  |  | /s/ Nicholas J. Panicaro
|Mark A. Imes                          |  |  |  | Nicholas J. Panicaro    
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer 
|                                      |  | 
|Date: August 7, 2009                  |  |  |  | Date: August 7, 2009
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE FIRST AMENDED
AND RESTATED LOAN AGREEMENT
 Amendment Borrower Borrowers Agent
 W I T N E S S E T H :
 First Amended and Restated Loan Agreement Existing Credit Agreement
   Defined Terms . Agreement
 Recitals Agent




---



##### 



Amendment of Certain Defined Terms
    Cash Equivalent Investments Schedule 3.18
 Second Amendment
 Second Amendment Date
 Amendment of Section 6.04(e)
 2




---



##### 



Amendment of Section 6.04(h)
  Amendment of Section 6.07(d)
  Waiver
 Counterparts
 Saving Clause
 3




---



##### 



Fees and Expenses
 Authorization
  4




---



##### 



SIGNATURE PAGE 1 OF 4 TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED
AND RESTATED LOAN AGREEMENT
  BORROWERS:MICHAEL BAKER CORPORATIONBy:
Title:
    
    /s/ Michael J. Zugay

Exec. VP and CFOMICHAEL BAKER, JR., INC.By:
Title:
    
    /s/ Michael J. Zugay

Exec. VP and CFOBAKER/MO SERVICES, INC.By:
Title:
    
    /s/ Michael J. Zugay

Exec. VP and CFOBAKER/OTS, INC.By:
Title:
    
    /s/ Michael J. Zugay

Exec. VP and CFOBAKER ENGINEERING NY, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Michael J. ZugayTitle:
    
    Exec. VP and CFO




---



##### 



SIGNATURE PAGE 2 OF 4 TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED
AND RESTATED LOAN AGREEMENT
 AGENT:CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIABy:
Title:
    
    /s/ John J. Ligday, Jr.

Senior Vice President




---



##### 



SIGNATURE PAGE 3 OF 4 TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED
AND RESTATED LOAN AGREEMENT
 PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:
Title:
    
    /s/ Troy Brown

Vice President




---



##### 



SIGNATURE PAGE 4 OF 4 TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED LOAN AGREEMENT
 FIFTH THIRD BANKBy:
Title:
    
    /s/ Neil Corry-Roberts

Senior Vice President
#### Peter Gonzalez et al., Appellants, v L’Oreal USA, Inc., Respondent.

Submitted April 9, 2012;

decided June 5, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000851724
<NAME> GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-G
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,084,672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  810,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,895,524
<PP&E>                                      30,099,047
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,441,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,810,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,611
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,636,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,810,536
<SALES>                                      3,807,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,951,293
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,333,886
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,617,407
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,617,407
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,617,407
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>