alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Chana Taub, Appellant, v Simon Taub, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 154]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krauss, J.), dated August 29, 2005, which, in effect, denied that branch of her motion which was for exclusive use and occupancy of the marital residence and directed the husband to erect a wall in the marital residence to provide separate living accommodations for the parties.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Courts are statutorily empowered to grant one spouse temporary exclusive use and occupancy of the marital residence during the pendency of divorce proceedings *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 234). Such an order is appropriate only upon a showing that the relief is necessary to protect the safety of persons or property, or one spouse has voluntarily established an alternative residence and a return would cause domestic strife *(see Kenner v Kenner,*13 AD3d 52 [2004]; *Mitzner v Mitzner,*228 AD2d 483 [1996]; *Annexstein v Annexstein,*202 AD2d 1062 [1994]; *Fakiris v Fakiris,*177 AD2d 540 [1991]; *Goodson v Goodson,*135 AD2d 604 [1987]; *Purdy v Purdy,*117 AD2d 659 [1986]; *Wolfe v Wolfe,*111 AD2d 809 [1985]).

Contrary to the wife’s contention, she did not meet her burden of establishing that the removal of the husband from the marital residence was necessary to protect her safety. The wife’s only allegations of actual violence were incredible, and the alleged threats made by the husband were uncorroborated.

As it is undisputed that the husband did not voluntarily vacate the marital residence, there was no basis to award the wife exclusive occupancy of the marital residence. Thus, directing the separation of the marital residence into two separate residences, with each spouse having access only to their respective portions, while novel, was within the court’s discretion.

*613The wife’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.E, Santucci, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; NHLBI Grant Opportunities in Comparative Effectiveness (ARRA).                    

*Date:*                         July 8, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Robert Blaine Moore, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7213, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-8394,                         *mooreb@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 18, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-15065 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Opinion filed June 21, 2012

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-12-00166-CR

__________

IN RE ROBERT L. GREENE 

Original Mandamus Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator, Robert L. Greene, has filed an application for writ of mandamus complaining of 

Hon. Ralph H. Walton Jr., Judge of the 355th District Court, with respect to relator’s criminal 

proceedings.

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b)(1) (West 2004) provides that each court of appeals 

for a court of appeals district may issue all writs of mandamus, agreeable to the principles of law 

regulating those writs, “against a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals 

district.” Hood County is not in the Eleventh Court of Appeals District. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.

§ 22.201(l) (West Supp. 2011). Instead, Hood County is in the Second Court of Appeals District. 

See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.201(c) (West Supp. 2011). Therefore, we do not have 

jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against the Judge of the 355th District Court of Hood 

County.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

June 21, 2012 PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Kalenak, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 15 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2008 Revision, published July 1, 2008, at 73 FR 37644.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the Certificate of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above-named company under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to qualify as acceptable surety on Federal bonds is terminated effective June 30, 2009. Federal bond-approving officials should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Department Circular 570 (“Circular”), 2008 Revision, to reflect this change.

With respect to any bonds, including continuous bonds, currently in force with above listed Company, bond-approving officers should secure new bonds with acceptable sureties in those instances where a significant amount of liability remains outstanding. In addition, in no event, should bonds that are continuous in nature be renewed.

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570.*

Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: June 11, 2009.

Kent Kuyumjian,

Comptroller and Deputy CFO.

[FR Doc. E9-14162 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
ACCEPTED

03-14-00819-cv

6094982

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/16/2015 11:57:59 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/16/2015 11:57:59 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Order entered July 15, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00943-CR

No. 05-14-00944-CR

CHARLES EVERAGE DOYAL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 199-80146-2014, 199-80147-2014

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s July 14, 2015 motion to extend time to file his amended 

brief. We ORDER the amended brief received on July 14, 2015 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1841-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-1841-DR), dated May 29, 2009, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         June 9, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 29, 2009.

Magoffin County for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E9-14274 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Please use this button to print

& submit via fax to

(202) 632-0045

National Indian Gaming Commission

Sacramento Region

Attendee Information

Name (First & Last) Position/Title

Business Street address City/State/Zip

Business E-mail address

**All fields are required**

NOTE: Please use a separate form for each attendee

Business contact phone number

*include area code - numbers only please

Entity registrant represents

Tribe Information

Ext.

If you do not represent a Tribe/Tribal Casino/Tribal Gaming

Commission entity, please enter agency name above.

Please use this button to submit

via E-mail (Outlook or Internet

based e-mail)

or

For further information or questions, please contact:

Tribe Name

Regulatory Review Consultation

Chukchansi Gold Resort & Casino

 September 15-16, 2011

Rita Homa

Executive Assistant

1441 L Street, N.W. Suite 9100

Washington, DC 20005

Phone: (202) 418-9807

Consultation Registration Form
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30532-30535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 09-23]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 09-23 with attached transmittal, and 
policy justification.

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 30533]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26JN09.214


[[Page 30534]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26JN09.215


[[Page 30535]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26JN09.216


    Dated: May 29, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-15111 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### In the Matter of Fatima U.T. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Winfred T., Appellant.

[977 NYS2d 754]

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals from (1) an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated September 10, 2012, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, terminated his parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect and committed the guardianship and custody of the subject child to the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, and (2) an order of the same court, also dated September 10, 2012, which approved the permanency plan of adoption by the child’s foster parents.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition and the order approving the permanency plan are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence presented at the fact-finding hearing established that, despite the presentment agency’s diligent efforts, the father permanently neglected the subject child by failing to plan for her future *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b; *Matter of Tramel T.V. [Tracina M.V.],*108 AD3d 726 [2013]; *Matter of Larice N. Mc. [Maurice Mc.],*108 AD3d 675, 676 [2013]; *Matter of Imani M.,*61 AD3d 870, 870-871 [2009]). Therefore, the Family Court’s determination that the father permanently neglected the child should not be disturbed.

In light of the evidence that the child had bonded with her foster family, with whom she had lived for most of her life, and that the father failed to plan for the child’s future, the Family Court properly determined that it was in the child’s best interests to terminate the father’s parental rights and free the child for adoption *(see Matter of Kenneth Frederick G. [Charles G.],*81 AD3d 645, 645-646 [2011]; *Matter of Jeremy D.R.,*40 AD3d 764, 765 [2007]). Mastro, J.E, Roman, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Leonel VARGAS-ALARCON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40420.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 20, 2006.

Paula Camille Offenhauser, James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Tony Ray Roberts, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Sarny K. Khalil, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for D efendant-App ellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Luis Leonel Vargas-Alarcon pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to being an alien unlawfully found in the United States after deportation and was sentenced to 57 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. As a condition of supervised release, Vargas-Alarcon was ordered to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as directed by his probation officer.

Vargas-Alarcon argues that the district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release. This claim is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it is not ripe for review. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662).

Vargas-Alareon’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although VargasAlarcon contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Vargas-Alarcon properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 54 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States 

Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2019 

Mr. CONNOLLY (for himself and Mr. GRAVES of Missouri) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure the continuation of its 6- 

day mail delivery service. 

Whereas the United States Postal Service has announced 

that it may need to reduce the frequency of its mail delivery service from 6 days a week to 5 days a week; 

Whereas 6-day mail delivery service is an essential service 

that the American people have relied on since 1912, particularly working families that depend on the Postal Service for the timely delivery of their paychecks; and 

Whereas reducing mail delivery service to 5 days a week 

would inevitably cause not only delays in the delivery of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 54 IH 

mail, but higher postal costs, due to the many hours of 

additional overtime that the Postal Service would require 

in order to handle the resulting back-up of mail: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the United States Postal Service should 

3 take all appropriate measures to ensure the continuation 

4 of its 6-day mail delivery service. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
97-657.

#### State ex rel. Miyagishima v. Funk.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondents. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent and would grant an alternative writ.
# Mental Health Minute: Stress and Anxiety in Adolescents 

September 10, 2021

## Transcript

**Transcript**

[music]

**Narrator:** Got 60 seconds? Take a mental health minute to learn about stress and anxiety in adolescents.

Anxiety is your body's reaction to stress and can occur even if there is no current threat.

If anxiety doesn't go away and begins to interfere with your life, it could affect your health.

There are several coping strategies you can try to reduce your anxiety and stress.

Keep a journal to help identify and challenge your negative and unhelpful thoughts.

Do a body scan to identify physical symptoms of stress and anxiety in your body like headaches or body pain.

Download an app that provides relaxation or mindfulness exercises such as deep breathing or visualization.

Exercise, eat healthy, avoid caffeine, and stick to a sleep routine.

And reach out to your friends or family members who can help you cope in a positive way.

If you are still struggling to cope, or the symptoms won't go away, share how you're feeling with a parent or trusted adult. It may be time to talk to a health care professional.

Learn more about anxiety through the NIMH website, and share this mental health minute video to help someone else.