alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment No. 1”) is effective as of the      day of May 2013 (the “Effective Date”) between ATRICURE, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”) and MICHAEL H.
CARREL (the “Executive”). 
 RECITALS 
 A. The Corporation and the Executive have entered into that certain Employment Agreement, effective as of November 1, 2012 (the “Employment Agreement”), pursuant to which the Corporation
retained the Executive. 
 B. The Corporation and the Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement as provided in this
Amendment No. 1. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations hereinafter set forth, the
parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment No. 1 have the meanings
assigned such terms in the Employment Agreement. 
 2. Section 3 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated
to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “3. Work Location. The Executive shall perform his duties hereunder in such
locations as may be required by the nature of such duties from time to time.” 
 3. Other than as set forth in this
Amendment No. 1, all of the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 
 4.
This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio, without reference to the conflicts of laws of the State of Ohio or any other jurisdiction. 

[signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment No. 1 to Employment
Agreement effective as of the date first above written. 
  
  

			
	ATRICURE, INC.
		
	By:	 	 
		 	M. Andrew Wade
		 	Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
	
	EMPLOYEE
	
	 
	Michael H. Carrel



  
 -2-
#### In the Matter of the Foreclosure of Tax Liens by County of Sullivan, Respondent. Witold Matejkowski, Appellant.

Decided September 12, 2013

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00153-CR

DANNY JOE WEIR, JR.,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 66th District Court

Hill County, Texas

Trial Court No. 38,293

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We 

have not issued a decision in this appeal, and Appellant personally signed the motion. 

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice
Weir v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed July 16, 2015

Do not publish

[CR25]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kingston Systems Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George J. Coupe, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.




                               By: /s/ George J. Coupe
                                   -------------------------------
                                   George J. Coupe
                                   Chief Financial Officer

                                   July 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kingston Systems Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ralph E. McKittrick,
Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                           KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.

                                       By: /s/ Ralph E. McKittrick
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Ralph E. McKittrick
                                           Chief Executive Officer

                                           July 16, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000833054
<NAME>                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PTSP II-C

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                   118,170
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            192,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         310,735
<PP&E>                                 9,314,754
<DEPRECIATION>                         8,034,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,744,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     66,909
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,618,008
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,744,225
<SALES>                                  524,665
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         526,572
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            407,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          119,155
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      119,155
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             119,155
<EPS-BASIC>                               0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 116 (Thursday, June 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14339]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6773]


Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs

    Notice: Amendment to original Request for Grant Proposals (RFGP) 
(Critical Language Scholarships for Intensive Summer Institutes--
Reference Number ECA/A/E-10-01).
    Summary: The United States Department of State, Bureau of 
Educational and Cultural Affairs, announces revisions to the original 
RFGP (Public Notice 6640) announced in the Federal Register on 
Thursday, May 28, 2009 (Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101):
    (1) Due to a typographic error on page 25600, Section II. Award 
Information, it should be noted that the anticipated award date is 
October 1, 2009 and not October 1, 2010. This section should read: 
``Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, the proposed 
start date is October 1, 2009.''
    (2) The deadline for proposals for Critical Language Scholarships 
for Intensive Summer Institutes has been extended to July 17, 2009.
    (3) All other terms and conditions of the original RFGP remain the 
same.
    Additional Information: As stated in the original RFGP, interested 
organizations should contact Heidi Manley, Program Officer at 202-453-
8534 or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#367b57585a534f7e7a76454257425318515940"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ade0ccc3c1c8d4e5e1edded9ccd9c883cac2db">[email protected]</span></a> for additional information 
regarding the Critical Language Scholarships for Intensive Summer 
Institutes prior to the application deadline.

    Dated: June 12, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-14339 Filed 6-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[980 NE2d 532, 956 NYS2d 482]

#### Kayla James, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Atara James, et al., Appellants, v Loran Realty V Corp., Defendant, and Frank Palazzolo et al., Respondents.

Decided November 29, 2012

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo P.C.,*New York City *(Brian J. Shoot*of counsel), for appellants.

*919*Hass & Gottlieb,*Scarsdale *(Lawrence M. Gottlieb*of counsel), for Frank Palazzolo, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.

Plaintiffs, as the party seeking to pierce the corporate veil, had the burden to show that the individual defendants “abused the privilege of doing business in the corporate form to perpetrate a wrong or injustice against” them *(Matter of Morris v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin.,*82 NY2d 135, 142 [1993]). Plaintiffs did not meet this burden, inasmuch as they failed to produce evidence that the individual defendants took steps to render the corporate defendant insolvent in order to avoid plaintiffs’ claim for damages or otherwise defraud plaintiffs.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative, in a memorandum.
[986 NE2d 436, 963 NYS2d 618]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Rodriguez, Appellant.

Decided March 21, 2013

*1074APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Lynn W.L. Fahey, Appellate Advocates,*New York City *(Ellen Fried*of counsel), for appellant.

*Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney,*Brooklyn *(Victor Barall*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed *(see People v Norris,*20 NY3d 1068 [2013] [decided today]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott. Taking no part: Judge Rivera.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<CIK>                                               0000811078
<NAME>                                Shearson Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P.

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                     4,010,166
<SECURITIES>                                                  (2,058)
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 12,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           4,020,521
<PP&E>                                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             4,020,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        164,126
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 3,856,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               4,020,521
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            (833,521)
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             243,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (1,076,852)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (1,076,852)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (590.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Theophilus Y. Ojuola, Appellant, v New York State Division of Human Rights, Respondent.

Submitted January 14, 2013;

decided February 12, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Judge Rivera taking no part.
- 492 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance S

302 Nebraska Report

STATE v. SAVAGE

Cite as 302 Neb. 492

State of Nebraska, appellee, v.

Courtney J. Savage, appella

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed March 15, 2019. No. S-17-1166.

supplemental opin

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: Sus

I. Strong, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overrul

Darik J. Von Loh, of Hernandez Frantz, Von Loh, appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Austin N. Relph 

for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stac

Papik, and Freudenberg, 

Per Curiam

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the 

appellant, Courtney J. Savage, concerning our opinion in State 

v. Savage, 301 Neb. 873, 920 N.W.2d 692 (2018). We overrule 

the motion, but we modify the opinion as follows:

In the subsection “(a) Authentication,” after the fourth 

sentence of the fourth paragraph, we insert the following 

language:

As for Savage’s contention that the State did not properly 

authenticate messages sent to him by others, we again 

disagree. The State was required only to introduce testimony sufficient to establish that the evidence was what 

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

04/25/2019 09:07 AM CDT
- 493 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance S

302 Nebraska Report

STATE v. SAVAGE

Cite as 302 Neb. 492

the State claimed it to be. The State did not claim that 

messages sent by others were anything more than messages sent to Savage’s cell phone. See State v. Elseman, 

287 Neb. 134, 841 N.W.2d 225 (2014).

Savage, 301 Neb. at 885, 920 N.W.2d at 703.

In subsection “(b) Hearsay,” following the second to the last 

paragraph, we insert the following paragraph:

We also reject Savage’s argument that text messages 

sent to his cell phone by unidentified individuals contained 

inadmissible hearsay. Hearsay is “a statement, other than 

one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or 

hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-801(3) (Reissue 2016). 

Messages sent to Savage’s cell phone were not offered 

for the truth of the matters asserted. They were offered to 

prove that the statements were made.

Savage, 301 Neb. at 887, 920 N.W.2d at 704.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

 Former opinion modif

 Motion for rehearing overru
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

RICARDO RAMIREZ, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 22-0173 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2008-155341-001

The Honorable Adam D. Driggs, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Krista Wood

Counsel for Respondent

Ricardo Ramirez, Florence

Petitioner

FILED 2-28-2023
STATE v. RAMIREZ

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Cynthia J. Bailey, Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, and Judge 

David D. Weinzweig delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Ricardo Ramirez seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is 

petitioner’s sixth successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is 

petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 

537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of 

establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
Exhibit 32.2  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/S/ Donna UrbainName:Donna UrbainTitle:Principal Financial Officer with respect to Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.Date:May 11, 2007
Appeal Notice of Assignment 

CAUSE NO. 73277 

THE STATE OF TEXAS 300th District Court 

vs of 

DEXTER KEITH ROYSTON Brazoria County, Texas 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT ON APPEAL 

 ON THE 17th day of June, 2015, the defendant in the above styled and numbered cause 

excepted to the order of the Court in said cause and gave Notice of Appeal to the Court of 

Appeals, First Judicial District. 

Date of Judgment or Other Order Appealed From: 6/10/15 

Date of Sentencing: 6/10/15 

Name of Trial Court Judge: K. Randall Hufstetler 

Name of Court Reporter: Renee Rape 

Name and Address of Defense Attorney on Appeal: 

 Perry Stevens, (Appointed) 

 603 E. Mulberry 

 Angleton, Texas 77515 

 

Name and Address of Attorney for the State on Appeal: 

 Jeri Yenne, District Attorney 

 Brazoria County Courthouse 

 111 East Locust, Suite 408-A 

 Angleton, TX 77515 

Defendant Incarcerated? Yes 

Motion for New Trial Filed? No 

Appeal Bond: No Date N/A 

Offense and Punishment: AGGRAVATED ASSAULT – HABITUAL: FORTY (40) YEARS – 

TDCJ-ID 

 RHONDA BARCHAK, District Clerk 

 By /S/ Kathleen McDougald, Deputy

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/10/2015 9:36:43 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
70', 

I fl • I r-e. 

r I 

I: 

I 

I 

I 

\ I 

12410 

BC020'<"CA CO. O; .. ·h .... c.T 

I\\~. ).....0""",,' -\- ..s~ 

A/'I'?l",e~otJ 11'")( 77c-IS 

ND+\cl. o-P Fi! \\1119 A ppec...-\ '. C~e '\$- 73;:)./1 / />(39"-0. Vo.-+ed .4.s..s"""'"'-I-\-

GY"~-\-n--e I ON /1> of' 3'u",e :lOIS iN 

~ ::,r::f0 0 IS -h \ d· CCU"Y '\ c.f' &-0.:20'<"; 0 ~~, 

I .......:>Q...S se.N~.....,ce 4-c:. LjO yrs. of T.\:). c. 3. ~ "S:... s+o.;\ .... e ~-\- 1: '-'-';,:::.\-.. \-~ ~ppeo..\ 
\~ 

f-

;:: 

0 

~ 'i! 

~1; 

t" 

ct 

., 

'" . ~ 

1 

1 

j 

I 

,.,,1 

'" z.

c:~. 

iii 

'" ~ 

,~" u..i"-'I 

l_).;-. 

u~ u ,~ 

,-" j -

" 11'1- _ ur->i ? 

L. L 

.. 

L .' -

w' , 

u. 

:c , 

u , 

, ,: , 

, 

< 

, 

c.' '. 

Ul 

i\j 

<) 

r'" 

\11 

'::1" 

111 -,..1 

1.0 

r~· 

r···
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15029]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

June 19, 2009.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 27, 2009 
to be assured of consideration.

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)

    OMB Number: 1513-0087.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Labeling and Advertising Requirements Under the Federal 
Alcohol Administration Act.
    Description: Bottlers and importers of alcohol beverages must 
adhere to numerous performance standards for statements made on labels 
and in advertisements of alcohol beverages. These performance standards 
include minimum mandatory labeling and advertising statements.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 7,071 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Frank Foote (202) 927-9347, Alcohol and Tobacco 
Tax and Trade Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20005.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed (202) 395-7873, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.

Celina Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-15029 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P