alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

# AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility under the EB program for Nevada.

The following change has occurred since the publication of the last notice regarding Nevada's EB status:
      - Nevada has modified its law by adding a total unemployment rate (TUR) trigger retroactive to February 1, 2009. As a result, Nevada has retroactively triggered “on” to a high unemployment period (HUP) for weeks of unemployment beginning February 22, 2009, and eligible unemployed workers will be able to collect up to an additional 20 weeks of unemployment insurance benefits.

## Information for Claimants

The duration of benefits payable in the EB program, and the terms and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and the operating instructions issued to the states by the U.S. Department of Labor. In the case of a state beginning an HUP, the State Workforce Agency will furnish a written notice of potential entitlement to each individual who has exhausted all rights to regular benefits and is potentially eligible for EB (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)). Persons who believe they may be entitled to EB or who wish to inquire about their rights under the program should contact their State Workforce Agency.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Workforce Security, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances Perkins Bldg. Room S-4231, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3008 (this is not a toll-free number) or by                         *e-mail: gibbons.scott@dol.gov*.                    

Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of June 2009.

Douglas F. Small,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-14973 Filed 6-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of IT Tech Packaging, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhenyong
Liu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference
into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language
in such filing.



|Dated: August 8, 2019 | By: | /s/
    Zhenyong Liu         
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------------
|                      |     | Zhenyong Liu                 
|                      |     | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      |     | (Principal Executive Officer)
July 9, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DAVID E. JOHNSON, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00197-CV V.

NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on March 2, 2015. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, David E. Johnson.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
November 15 , 2011



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TRIPLE 8 VENTURE COR PORATION D/B/A TRIPL E 8 CONSULTING , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00740

- CV V.

BLANKENSHIP REALTY C ONSULTANTS GROUP, IN C. , Appellee

____________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on May 27, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reas on of this appeal be paid by
TRIPLE 8 VENTURE COR PORATION D/B/A TRIPL E 8 CONSULTING

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 
 SCHLUMBERGER 2005 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 Third Amendment 

Schlumberger Limited, a Curaçao corporation, having heretofore adopted the Schlumberger 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”), and having reserved the right under Section 12 thereof to amend the Plan, does hereby amend Section 3(a) of the Plan by adding the following sentence to the end thereto, effective as of June 30, 2013: 

“The foregoing notwithstanding, with respect to an employee who has received an Award and whose employment is transferred directly
and without interruption to a corporation, limited liability company or other entity (a ‘OneSubsea Company’) pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of that certain Master Formation Agreement by and among Cameron International
Corporation, the Company, Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Schlumberger B.V., dated as of November 14, 2012, and the related agreements contemplated therein, such employee’s employment with the Company shall include employment with a
OneSubsea Company for all purposes under the Plan (other than eligibility for new grants), and any Awards shall not be affected by such employee’s subsequent transfer of employment directly and without interruption from a OneSubsea Company to
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, from the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to a OneSubsea Company or between OneSubsea Companies.” 
 Approved on behalf of Schlumberger Limited by: 

Name:    /s/    Alexander C. Juden 
 Title:      Secretary and General Counsel
*Monday, March 3, 1997*

MOTION DOCKET

95-2635.

#### McClosky v. Regal Mining, Inc.

Carroll App. No. 650. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Carroll County.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that oral argument scheduled for March 4, 1997, be, and hereby is, continued until further order of the court.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTA ENA LOPEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-72449 

Agency No. A205-515-800 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Marta Ena Lopez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal 

from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-72449 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence 

the agency’s factual findings. Conde Quevedo v. Barr, 947 F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th 

Cir. 2020). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Lopez failed 

to establish that the Salvadoran government was or would be unable or unwilling 

to protect her from the persecution she fears. See Truong v. Holder, 613 F.3d 938, 

941-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (record did not compel the conclusion that the government 

was unable or unwilling to control the individuals feared); see also Sanjaa v. 

Sessions, 863 F.3d 1161, 1164 (9th Cir. 2017) (“To reverse the BIA, we must 

determine that the evidence not only supports [a contrary] conclusion, but compels

it . . . .” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)). Thus, Lopez’s asylum 

and withholding of removal claims fail.

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Lopez’s remaining contentions 

regarding the merits of her asylum and withholding of removal claims. See

Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and agencies are 

not required to decide issues unnecessary to the results they reach). 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Lopez failed to show it is more likely than not she will be tortured by or with the 

consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El Salvador. See Aden v. 

Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). 
3 15-72449 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1129

_____________________________

ALAN E. DAVIDSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Melissa Olin, Judge.

April 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and LONG, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Tyler K. Payne, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40523

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GUSTAVO ORTEGA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:15-CR-1170-1

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gustavo Ortega has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Ortega has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 20, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40523 Document: 00513843035 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/20/2017
No. 16-40523

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40523 Document: 00513843035 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/20/2017
JOE EDDIE WILSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-6131

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 14, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County.

Stanley H. Griffis, III, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Ream, Assistant Public 

Defender, Crawfordville, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Joe Eddie Wilson appeals his conviction for driving while his license was 

canceled, suspended, or revoked with two or more previous convictions for the 

same offense in violation of section 322.34(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2012). He was 

sentenced to four years in prison after a jury trial where he had proceeded pro se.

He argues on appeal, with the assistance of public counsel, that the trial 

court did not conduct an adequate inquiry into whether his waiver of the right to 
2

counsel was knowing and intelligent. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.111(d); Faretta v. 

California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975). We agree. As the State properly concedes, 

Appellant is entitled to a new trial. See e.g., Brown v. State, 971 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 

1st DCA 2008). Accordingly, we REVERSE Appellant’s conviction and sentence 

and REMAND for a new trial.

ROWE, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 10

                                                               November 11, 1998

Century Communications Corp.
50 Locust Avenue
New Canaan, Connecticut 06840-4750

Gentlemen:

        Reference is made to the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 
12, 1998, by and between American Cable TV Investors 5, Ltd. and Century 
Communications Corp. (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used but not defined 
herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

        This letter will confirm our agreement with you as follows:

        1. The reference in the definition of Termination Date in Article I of 
           the Agreement to "210 days" shall be replaced with "300 days".

        2. The reference in the proviso in Section 7.14(a) of the Agreement to
           "Closing Date" shall be replaced with "date on which the Joint
           Venture is consummated" and the reference to "Closing" shall be
           replaced with "consummation of the Joint Venture".

        This letter shall constitute an amendment to the Agreement. Except as 
modified in this letter, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.

        This letter may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which
will be deemed an original.

Very truly yours,

AMERICAN CABLE TV INVESTORS 5, LTD.

By:  IR-TCI PARTNERS V, L.P., its general partner
 
     By:  TCI Ventures Five, Inc., its general partner

          By:  /s/ Marvin Jones
               ------------------------------
               Marvin Jones
               Vice President

CENTURY COMMUNICATIONS CORP.

By:  /s/ Scott N. Schneider
     ----------------------------------------
     Name: Scott N. Schneider
     Title: CFO
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Porter
Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David B. Pierce, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                      |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                    |  |  |  | PORTER BANCORP, INC.
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 13, 2008 |  |  |  | By:                  |  | /s/ David B. Pierce    
|                    |  |  |  |                      |  | David B. Pierce        
|                    |  |  |  |                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 11.01
                      DIGITAL LINK CORPORATION
         STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE  
               (In thousands, except per share data)
               
                                               1996      1995      1994

Weighted-average common shares outstanding
  for the period                               9,106     8,784     7,972
Weighted-average shares from conversion of
  preferred stock                               ----      ----       319
Common equivalent shares from conversion of
   stock options under treasury stock method     372       683       822
Shares used in computing per share amounts     9,478     9,467     9,113
Net income                                    $4,697    $4,814    $4,408

Net income per share                          $ 0.50    $ 0.51    $ 0.48


Note:  There is no material difference in the computation of net income 
       per share on a fully diluted basis.
# Publications about Prevention

5 Action Steps for Helping Someone in Emotional Pain

Infographic presents five steps for helping someone in emotional pain in order to prevent suicide. Steps include: Ask, Keep Them Safe, Be There, Help Them Connect, and Stay Connected.

En español

My Mental Health: Do I Need Help?

This fact sheet presents information about how to assess your mental health and determine if you need help. It provides examples of mild and severe symptoms, as well as self-care activities and options for professional help.

En español

Tips for Talking With a Health Care Provider About Your Mental Health

This fact sheet provides five tips to help prepare and guide you on how to talk to a health care provider about your mental health and get the most out of your visit.

En español
3ox -IS

COA # 08-12-00300-CR OFFENSE: 1

Robert Carver v. The State of __.,,,._, ~ . STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Denton

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM

DATE: 1/28/15

TRIAL COURT: 362nd District Court

Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-2010-2243-D

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

Robert Carver v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA#:

PRO SF Petition CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

DATE: as-/A3/*f^o/r

JUDGE: rtA tct^U^aJ^.

JUDGE:

SIGNED:.

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR
Exhibit 21.1



Subsidiaries of the Registrants





|                                            |                                         
|------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------
|                                            |                                         
|Blue Ridge Real Estate Company Subsidiaries | Jurisdiction of Incorporation/ Formation
|                                            |                                         
|1.
Northeast Land Company                   | Pennsylvania                            
|2.
Jack Frost Mountain Company              | Pennsylvania                            
|3.
BRRE Holdings, Inc.                      | Delaware                                
|4.
Boulder Creek Resort Company             | Pennsylvania                            
|5.
Moseywood Construction Company           | Pennsylvania                            
|6.
Jack Frost National Golf Course, Inc.    | Pennsylvania                            
|7.
Oxbridge Square Shopping Center, LLC     | Virginia                                
|8.
Coursey Commons Shopping Center, LLC     | Louisiana                               
|9.
Coursey Creek, LLC                       | Louisiana                               
|10.
Cobble Creek, LLC                       | Louisiana                               
|                                            |                                         
|                                            |                                         
|Big Boulder Corporation Subsidiaries        | Jurisdiction of Incorporation/ Formation
|                                            |                                         
|1.
Lake Mountain Company                    | Pennsylvania                            
|2.
BBC Holdings, Inc.                       | Delaware                                
|3.
Big Boulder Lodge, Inc.                  | Pennsylvania                            
|                                            |