alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 392 

Recognizing ‘‘National Public Works Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2019 

Mrs. CRAIG (for herself, Ms. TITUS, and Mr. FITZPATRICK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing ‘‘National Public Works Week’’. 

Whereas public works professionals focus on infrastructure, 

facilities, and services that are of vital importance to sustainable and resilient communities and to the public 

health, high quality of life, and well-being of the United 

States of America; 

Whereas such infrastructure, facilities, and services could not 

be provided without the dedicated efforts of public works 

professionals, who are engineers, managers, and employees of Federal, State, and local government and the private sector, and who are responsible for rebuilding, improving, and protecting our Nation’s transportation, 

water supply, water treatment and solid waste systems, 

public buildings, and other structures and facilities essential for our citizens; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 392 IH 

Whereas it is in the public interest for citizens, civic leaders, 

and children of the United States to gain knowledge of, 

and to maintain a progressive interest and understanding 

of, the importance of public works and public works programs in their respective communities; and 

Whereas the year the week of May 19 through 25, 2019, 

marks the 59th annual ‘‘National Public Works Week’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 ‘‘National Public Works Week’’ and encourages the people 

3 of the United States to pay tribute to our public works 

4 professionals, engineers, managers, and employees and to 

5 recognize the substantial contributions they make to pro6 tecting our national health, safety, and quality of life. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# Director’s Innovation Speaker Series: Beyond FDA Approval: Assessing the Value of New Health Technologies

### ** Date      

### ** Location

## Overview

Foluso Agboola, MBBS, MPH** provided a brief background on the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) and described the Value Assessment Framework (i.e., the conceptual framework and set of associated methods that guide the development of ICER’s evidence reports) using their review of esketamine for treatment-resistant depression as an example. Dr. Agboola also provided examples of how ICER’s work is applied in the real world.

## Recording

Read the transcript.

## About Dr. Agboola

Dr. Agboola is the Vice President of Research at ICER. This independent non-profit research institute generates evidence on the effectiveness and value of drugs and other medical services.

## About the Director’s Innovation Speaker Series

The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) established the Director’s Innovation Speaker Series to encourage broad, interdisciplinary thinking in the development of scientific initiatives and programs, and to press for theoretical leaps in science over the continuation of incremental thought. Innovation speakers are encouraged to describe their work from the perspective of breaking through existing boundaries and developing successful new ideas, as well as working outside their primary area of expertise in ways that have pushed their fields forward. We encourage discussions of the meaning of innovation, creativity, breakthroughs, and paradigm-shifting.

## Sponsored by

Division of Extramural Activities
FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/16/2015 4:02:51 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
No. 03-14-00080-CV

In the Third Court of Appeals

Austin, Texas

GATTIS ELECTRIC, INC.,

Appellant

V.

THERESA MARIE MANN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN

OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF JAMES LAWHON,

Appellee

APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-12-001971

125TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

HON. TIM SULAK PRESIDING

AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE ON APPELLEE’S 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE POST-SUBMISSION

LETTER OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY

Appellee’s undersigned counsel certifies that he has conferred with 

appellant’s lead counsel, Kevin Jewell, about appellee’s motion for leave to file a 

post-submission letter of supplemental authority. Mr. Jewell stated that he does not 

oppose the motion for leave.

ACCEPTED

03-14-00080-CV

6054847

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/14/2015 11:37:29 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/14/2015 11:37:29 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2

Respectfully submitted,

SMITH LAW GROUP LLLP

By: /s/D. Todd Smith

D. Todd Smith

State Bar No. 00797451

todd@appealsplus.com

1250 Capital of Texas Highway South

Three Cielo Center, Suite 601

Austin, Texas 78746

(512) 439-3230

(512) 439-3232 fax

Counsel for Appellee

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On July 14, 2015, in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

9.5, I served this document by e-service to:

Kevin D. Jewell

CHAMBERLAIN, HRDLICKA, WHITE,

WILLIAMS & AUGHTRY

1200 Smith Street, Suite 1400

Houston, Texas 77002

Lead Appellate Counsel for Appellant

Gattis Electric, Inc.

/s/ D. Todd Smith

D. Todd Smith
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF EVERYDAY HEALTH, INC.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of Everyday Health, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Benjamin Wolin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge, based upon a review of the Report:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Benjamin Wolin                         

Name: Benjamin Wolin

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 13, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>


                                                              Exhibit 27
                                                              ----------


                      CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
                         FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                             ($ In Millions)

<CAPTION>


THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.

       

<S>                               <C>

<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000,000

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<CASH>                                     87
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             649
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                               104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          959
<PP&E>                                  6,829
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          8,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,257
<BONDS>                                 1,732
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                              3,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            8,464
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        3,734
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           3,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           236
<INCOME-TAX>                              230
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         6
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                6
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0


        

<PAGE>


</TABLE>
@conference{1211021,
  author = {Julie Haney and Sandra Prettyman and Mary Frances Theofanos and Susanne M. Furman},
  title = {Data Guardians: Behaviors and Challenges While Caring for Others' Personal Data},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-07-23 04:07:00},
  publisher = {Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
, Copenhagen, DK},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=935379},
  language = {en},
}
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10185 Summary Calendar

MICHAEL HOWARD BERTOK, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CV-333-A

- - - - - - - - - - September 2, 1997 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Michael Howard Bertok, Texas state prisoner #631579, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This court previously granted Bertok a certificate of appealability on the issue whether retroactive application of a TDCJ policy discontinuing the restoration of forfeited good-conduct time violates the Ex Post Facto Clause. We have reviewed the recordNo. 97-10185 -2- and find no reversible error. See Hallmark v. Johnson , ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. July 25, 1997, No. 95-20752), 1997 WL 420147. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


Independent Auditors Consent


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Andover Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement on Form S-8
of Andover Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 18, 2001, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Andover Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report is
included herein.


                                             /s/ KPMG LLP
                                             --------------------------

Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 2001
94-2701.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Pagac.

IT IS ORDERED by this court, *sua sponte,*effective May 7, 1997, that Paul Pagac III, Attorney Registration No. 0015049, last known address in Youngstown, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of June 28,1995, to wit: failure to pay publication costs in the amount of $40.40 on or before April 18,1996.
Exhibit 10N - English translation BBVA Lease






FINAL VERSION
Tijuana, B.C., February 23, 2012
[see source for watermark in English]


PROCADEF 1, S.A.P.I. DE C.V.
Paseos de los Héroes 9188
Piso 5
Zona Urbana Río Tijuana
Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico.


Re: Notice of assignment.


With regard to the Lease Contract entered into on February 21, 2000, between BBVA Bancomer Servicios, S.A., in its capacity as Trustee of the “Submetrópoli de Tijuana” Trust and Ensatec, S.A. de C.V., with respect to the industrial unit and ancillary improvements located at Calle Colinas 11730 del Fraccionamiento Parque Industrial El Florido, Sección Colinas, Delegación La Presa, Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico, and also with regard to the Agreement that we entered into with you with effective date as of August 14, 2011 (the “Agreement”), we hereby serve notice in relation to the following:


		
	I.
	Pursuant to Clause Five of the Agreement, Ensatec, S.A. de C.V. assigned all of its rights to Pall Mexico Manufacturing, S. de R.L. de C.V., effective as of February 23, 2012.


		
	II.
	



		
	III.
	With regard to Clause Eight of the Agreement, Ensatec, S.A. de C.V. indicated as its domicile to hear and receive all types of notifications and notices, the address at: Blvd. Agua Caliente 10470, Desp.#1, Centro Comercial Barranquitas, Col. Revolución, Tijuana, B.C. Mexico 22015.




With nothing further at present, we thank you for your taking the time to read this notification and notice.


Regards,




Pall Mexico Manufacturing, S. de R.L. de C.V.            Ensatec, S.A. de C.V.


[signature]                            [signature]
Mr. Leobardo Tenorio Malof                    Mr. Hector Machado Barraza, Engineer




[handwritten:] Received original, 02/23/2012
Mauricio Javier Villa Soaje
Paseo de los Heroes 9188 Piso 5
Zona Urbana, Rio Tijuana
Tijuana, B.O., Mexico
[signature]


[9.5.2.4] [Notice of Assignment (A3-1).pdf] [Page 1 of 1]
#### Lorenzo Williams, Appellant, v Sayed B. Kadri, Also Known as Sayed Burhan Kadri et al., Respondents.

[976 NYS2d 460]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered May 13, 2013, which denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on liability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

The record shows that the limousine operated by plaintiff was struck in the rear by defendants’ taxi, while stopped at a red traffic light on East 75th Street and First Avenue. Defendant driver testified that he drove “very slowly” because of snowy conditions and ice on the roadway, but when he tried to stop, the taxi slid on ice and struck plaintiff’s vehicle. Defendant driver could not estimate the distance between his taxi and plaintiffs limousine when he applied the brakes, or his speed.

It is well settled that a rear-end collision with a stopped or stopping vehicle establishes a prima facie case of negligence on the part of the driver of the rear vehicle, and imposes a duty on the part of the operator of the moving vehicle to come forward with an adequate non-negligent explanation for the accident *(see Tutrani v County of Suffolk,*10 NY3d 906, 908 [2008]). De*443fendants’ explanation that the taxi slipped on ice was inadequate because a driver is expected to maintain enough distance between himself and cars ahead of him so as to avoid collisions with stopped vehicles, taking into account weather and road conditions *(see LaMasa v Bachman,*56 AD3d 340 [1st Dept 2008]).

Defendants provide alternative explanations for the accident, including that plaintiff’s vehicle stopped short, and that the snow created an emergency condition. We decline to consider these arguments, which were improperly raised for the first time on appeal and are unsupported by nonhearsay evidence in the record. In any event, these defenses are insufficient to rebut the presumption of defendants’ negligence. Even if plaintiff’s vehicle had stopped short in front of defendants’ taxi, defendant driver failed to provide evidence that he maintained a safe distance between his cab and plaintiffs vehicle. Additionally, the emergency doctrine is inapplicable because defendant driver was aware of the icy road conditions and should have accounted for them properly *(see Renteria v Simakov,*109 AD3d 749 [1st Dept 2013]; *Corrigan v Porter Cab Corp.,*101 AD3d 471 [1st Dept 2012]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, DeGrasse, Freedman and Gische, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

STEVEN WESLEY BARKER,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00223-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law

of Hood County, Texas

(TC# 45124)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order this decision 

shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
#### Kristin Kahkonen Dupree, Respondent-Appellant, v James E. Giugliano, Appellant-Respondent.

Submitted January 7, 2013;

decided February 14, 2013

Motion for reargument denied *[see 20*NY3d 921 (2012)].

Judge Rivera taking no part.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sentry Petroleum Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Arne Raabe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 6th day of October, 2009.

| |     |                                                   
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                   
| | BY: | ARNE RAABEArne Raabe, 
Principal Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Howard Glenn Blake, Alleged to be Larry W. Barnett, Appellant, v George E. Pataki, as Governor of the State of New York, Respondent.

Submitted November 19, 2012;

decided January 8, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
CR-EX10.1_EvansagreementMay20133






Exhibit 10.1
AMENDMENT AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made as of this 20th day of May, 2013, by and between Crane Co., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Robert S. Evans (“Mr. Evans”).


WHEREAS, Mr. Evans currently serves as non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, and in such capacity receives compensation in accordance with an Agreement with the Company dated January 24, 2011, as amended February 27, 2012 (the “Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, under the Agreement, Mr. Evans participated in the Company’s 2009 Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan (the “2009 Plan”) providing for, among other things, an annual retainer for the Chairman of the Board, in the form of cash and “Deferred Stock Units” under the Plan, in an amount established by the Board from time (initially set at $225,000);


WHEREAS, effective April 22, 2013 the shareholders of the Company voted to approve the 2013 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) pursuant to which, among other things, (i) no further grants or payments shall be made under the 2009 Plan and (ii) the Management Organization and Compensation Committee is authorized to grant deferred stock units to directors, including the Chairman of the Board; and


WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein to coordinate with the approval of the 2013 Plan described above;


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree that the Agreement is amended effective as of the date of the 2013 annual meeting of stockholders of the Company as follows:


1.    Section 3(a) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:


“(a) Fees. For his service as Chairman, Mr. Evans shall receive an annual retainer in the amount and form as determined by the Board of Directors. Such annual retainer shall be reviewed annually by the Management Organization and Compensation Committee.”


2.    Except as expressly or by necessary implication amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by authority of its Board of Directors, and Mr. Evans has hereunto set his hand, on the day and year first above written. 
	
				
	 
	 
	CRANE CO.
	 

	/s/ Robert S. Evans
	 
	By:/s/ Eric C. Fast
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Title:Chief Executive Officer
No. 01-15-00206-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

HOUSTON, TEXAS

__________________________________________________________ 

No. 17166

IN THE 253RD DISTRICT COURT OF 

CHAMBERS COUNTY, TEXAS

__________________________________________________________ 

CODY CRYMES § Appellant

v. § 

STATE OF TEXAS § Appellee

__________________________________________________________ 

STATE'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

__________________________________________________________ 

Cheryl Swope Lieck

District Attorney

Chambers County, Texas

Kathy Esquivel

Assistant District Attorney

Chambers County, Texas

P.O. Box 1409

Anahuac, Texas 77514

(409) 267-2682

(409) 267-3105 

 kesquivel@co.chambers.tx.us

ACCEPTED

01-15-00206-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/17/2015 1:04:29 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/17/2015 1:04:29 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
COMES NOW the State of Texas, by and through her Assistant District 

Attorney, Kathy Esquivel, and, pursuant to TEX. R. APP. PRO. 73, presents this 

Motion for Extension of Time. In support of the motion, the State submits the 

following:

1. The above case is on appeal from a plea of guilty in the 253rd Judicial District 

Court of Chambers County, Texas. 

2. The State’s brief is currently due on July 17, 2015. 

3. This is the State’s first Motion for Extension of Time.

4. Counsel for the State was preparing for another jury trial in the 253rd District 

Court and did not have adequate time to complete the brief in this case. 

Further, counsel for the State was recovering from an illness that required 

several days off from work. 

5. The State requests that the time for filing the State’s Brief be extended by 14 

days to July 31, 2015. The State requests this extension not for delay, but to 

see that justice is done.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State prays that this

Court grant the State’s Motion for Extension of Time and extend the due date of the 

State’s Appellate Brief until July 31, 2015. 

Respectfully submitted,

CHERYL SWOPE LIECK

Chambers County District Attorney

/s/ Kathy Esquivel

KATHY ESQUIVEL

Assistant District Attorney
Chambers County, Texas

P.O. Box 1409

Anahuac, Texas 77514

(409) 267-2682

(409) 267-3105 FAX

SBN 24034432

kesquivel@co.chambers.tx.us

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been sent to 

opposing counsel via email on ___17th _____ day of July, 2015.

/s/ Kathy Esquivel

KATHY ESQUIVEL

Assistant District Attorney

Chambers County, Texas 

Rick Oliver

Attorney for Appellant
#### Ellen J. Gallagher, Respondent-Appellant, v Edward R. Gallagher, Appellant-Respondent.

Submitted July 9, 2012;

decided September 18, 2012

Motion by Edward R. Gallagher for leave to appeal denied. Motion by Ellen J. Gallagher for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]). Motion by Ellen J. Gallagher for other relief denied.