# Patent

## Title
Continuous glucose monitoring using an FAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenase

## Abstract

Provided is a method of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) comprising using an FAD-GDH. The FAD-GDH is capable of retaining initial activity over a certain period of time. Also provided is a method for screening for an FAD-GDH suitable for use in CGM as well as a CGM device comprising an FAD-GDH.

## Background
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is the U.S. National Stage of PCT/JP2018/013830, filed Mar. 30, 2018, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/479,442, filed Mar. 31, 2017.
The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted in ASCII format via EFS-WEB and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Jan. 16, 2019, is named sequence.txt and is 34 KB.


TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to continuous glucose monitoring using an FAD-Dependent glucose dehydrogenase.
BACKGROUND ART
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM, also referred to as flash glucose monitoring, FGM) systems are important for diagnosing and managing diabetes. CGM systems are capable of measuring blood glucose levels over a period of from a few days to about 1-2 weeks. A CGM system comprises a glucose sensor.
Measurement of glucose levels may be carried out with a glucose oxidase (GOD). Glucose oxidase uses oxygen as the electron acceptor when oxidizing glucose. This may be affected by dissolved oxygen present in a measurement sample. Currently, to the best of our knowledge, commercially available CGM devices are all based on glucose oxidase (GOD). Certain GODs, such as GODs from microorganisms belonging to the genus Aspergillus, such as Aspergillus niger, are known to retain enzyme activity even when placed under harsh thermal conditions (Non-patent literature 1: THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 278, No. 27, Issue of July 4, pp. 24324-24333, 2003). For this reason, CGM systems, in general, employ heat stable GODs.
Patent literature document 1 (WO 2015/099112, US20160319246) describes a GDH from a microorganism belonging to the genus Mucor. 
Non-patent literature 2 (Satake, et al, J Biosci Bioeng. 2015 November; 120(5):498-503) describes an FAD-GDH from Mucor prainii. This document states that “Glucose oxidase (GOD) (EC 1.1.3.4) has been widely used as a mediated amperometric glucose sensor based on its high thermostability and high glucose selectivity”.
Patent literature document 2 (WO 2002/036779, US 2004/0023330) describes a GDH from Burkholderia cepacia. The disclosed GDH is a membrane bound protein and comprises a cytochrome c domain. The amino acid sequence of the B. cepacia GDH is not similar to the FAD-dependent GDHs (also referred to herein as FAD-GDH) from microorganisms belonging to the genus Mucor. 
Patent literature document 3 (WO2013/051682) describes a GDH from Mucor guilliermondii (MgGDH).
Patent literature document 4 (JP Patent Application publication (Kokai) No. 2013-116102) describes a GDH from Mucor hiemalis (MhGDH).
Patent literature document 5 (WO 2013/022074, US20140154777) describes CsGDH from Circinella simplex and CRGDH from Circinella sp.
Patent literature document 6 (JP Patent Application publication (Kokai) No. 2013-176363) describes MdrGDH from Mucor RD056860.
Patent literature document 7 (JP Patent Application publication (Kokai) No. 2013-176364) describes MsGDH from Mucor subtilissimus. 
Patent literature document 8 (WO 2012/169512, US20140287445) describes a GDH from M. prainii. 
Patent literature document 9 (WO 2015/129475, EP3112461) describes a GDH from M. prainii. 
Patent literature document 10 (JP Patent Application publication (Kokai) No. 2014-207911) described a PQQ dependent GDH. The PQQ dependent GDH disclosed is reported to have activity on maltose.
Difficulties in implementing glucose sensors based on PQQ dependent GDHs have been reported. One reason is the relatively low substrate specificity, i.e., PQQ dependent GDHs are known to react on maltose in addition to glucose. See Non-patent literature 3.
CITATION LIST
Patent Literature
[PTL 1]
WO 2015/099112 (US20160319246)
[PTL 2]
WO 2002/036779 (US 2004/0023330)
[PTL 3]
WO 2013/051682
[PTL 4]
JP Patent Application publication (Kokai) No. 2013-116102 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,260,699)
[PTL 5]
WO 2013/022074 (US20140154777)
[PTL 6]
JP Patent Application publication (Kokai) No. 2013-176363
[PTL 7]
JP Patent Application publication (Kokai) No. 2013-176364
[PTL 8]
WO 2012/169512 (US20140287445)
[PTL 9]
WO 2015/129475 (EP3112461)
[PTL 10]
JP Patent Application publication (Kokai) No. 2014-207911
Non Patent Literature
[NPL 1]


    THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 278, No. 27, Issue of July 4, pp. 24324-24333, 2003


[NPL 2]

    Satake, et al, J Biosci Bioeng. 2015 November; 120(5):498-503


[NPL 3]

    Review of Adverse Events Associated With False Glucose Readings Measured by GDH-PQQ-Based Glucose Test Strips in the Presence of Interfering Sugars”, Diabetes Care. 2010 April; 33(4): 728-729


SUMMARY OF INVENTION
Technical Problem
It is an object of the invention to provide an improved CGM method.
Solution to Problem
Continuous glucose monitoring can, in theory, be carried out with a glucose sensor comprising a glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) or a glucose oxidase (GOD). Glucose dehydrogenase uses an electron acceptor when dehydrogenizing glucose. This may be advantageous in that the measurement may not affected by dissolved oxygen.
However, to the best of the inventor's knowledge, currently available commercial CGM devices are all based on glucose oxidase (GOD). This is believed to be due to the thermal stability of the GODs. Certain GODs, such as GODs from microorganisms belonging to the genus Aspergillus, such as Aspergillus niger, are widely known to retain enzyme activity even when placed under harsh thermal conditions for a short period of time (see Non-patent literature 1). It was known that GODs retain higher activity when placed under harsh thermal conditions than GDHs, particularly in the case of enzymes suitable for glucose sensors. This indicates that GODs are more stable than GDHs are.
However, the present inventor surprisingly found that certain FAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenases retain higher enzyme activity at ambient temperatures over a long period of time compared to commercially available GODs under identical conditions. This was particularly surprising in view of the fact that the commercially available GODs retained higher enzyme activity compared to said FAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenases when placed under high temperatures, e.g., under an accelerated test comprising heat treatment.
In view of such findings, provided herein is a method of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) comprising using an FAD-GDH. The FAD-GDH is capable of retaining initial activity over a certain period of time. Also provided herein is a method for screening for an FAD-GDH suitable for use in CGM as well as a CGM device comprising an FAD-GDH.
The following exemplary embodiments are provided:
Embodiment 1
A method of continuous glucose monitoring comprising using a GDH capable of
(a) retaining about 60% or more of the initial activity over a period of 1 week when retained at about 37-40° C.,
(b) retaining about 40% or more of the initial activity over a period of 2 weeks when retained at about 37-40° C., or
(c) retaining about 30% or more of the initial activity over a period of 3 weeks when retained at about 37-40° C.,
wherein said GDH is an FAD dependent GDH and wherein said GDH is not a membrane bound protein.
Embodiment 2
The method of embodiment 1, wherein the GDH is capable of retaining the activity specified in (a) to (c) of embodiment 1 when retained at a pH of 7.4.
Embodiment 3
The method of embodiment 1 or 2, wherein continuous glucose monitoring can be carried out without re-calibration.
Embodiment 4
A method for screening a GDH to be used in continuous glucose monitoring, said method comprising the steps of:
(i) preparing a candidate GDH,
(ii) retaining said candidate GDH at about 30-40° C. for a predetermined period,
(iii) determining the residual activity of said GDH after step (ii),
(iv) comparing the residual activity determined in step (iii) with the initial activity of said candidate GDH, wherein, when the residual GDH activity is
(a) about 60% or more compared to the initial GDH activity when retained at about 30-40° C. over a period of 1 week,
(b) about 40% or more compared to the initial GDH activity when retained at about 30-40° C. over a period of 2 weeks, or
(c) about 30% or more compared to the initial GDH activity when retained at about 30-40° C. over a period of 3 weeks,
then said candidate GDH is selected as a GDH having the potential to be used in continuous glucose monitoring over a period of 1 to 3 weeks.
Embodiment 5
The method of embodiment 4 in which step (ii) is not replaced with an accelerated heat treatment step comprising heat treatment at a temperature of about 50-60° C. at about 5-30 minutes.
Embodiment 6
A continuous glucose monitoring device comprising a GDH capable of
(a) retaining about 60% of the initial activity over a period of 1 week when retained at about 37-40° C.,
(b) retaining about 40% of the initial activity over a period of 2 weeks when retained at about 37-40° C., or
(c) retaining about 30% of the initial activity over a period of 3 weeks when retained at about 37-40° C., wherein said GDH is an FAD dependent GDH and wherein said GDH is not a membrane bound protein.
Embodiment 7
The device of embodiment 6, wherein the GDH is capable of retaining the activity specified in (a) to (c) of embodiment 6 when retained at a pH of 7.4.
Embodiment 8
The method of any one of embodiments 1-3, wherein the GDH has the following characteristics:
(1) activity as defined in any one of (a) to (c) of embodiment 1,
(2) substrate specificity: the reactivity to maltose is 2% or less, relative to the reactivity to D-glucose (100%);
(3) optimal activity pH: 6.5 to 7.5; and
(4) a molecular weight of about 65 to about 81 kDa when measured by SDS-PAGE.
Embodiment 9
The method of any one of embodiments 1-5 and 8, wherein the GDH is from a microorganism belonging to the genus Mucor, Absidia, Actinotnucor, Circinella, Parasitella or Rhizopus. 
Embodiment 10
The method of embodiment 9, wherein the GDH is a GDH from Mucor prainii, Mucor circinelloides, Mucor circinelioides f. cirinelloides, Mucor ambiguus, Mucor hiemalis, Mucor hiemalis f. silvaticus, Mucor subtilissimus, Mucor guilliermondii, Mucor javanicus, Mucor dimorphosporus, Mucor RD056860, Mucor subtilissimus, Absidia cylindrospora, Absidia hyalospora, Actinomucor elegans, Circinella minor, Circinella mucoroides, Circinella muscae, Circinella rigida, Circinella simplex, Circinella umbellata, Parasitella parasitica or Rhizopus microsporus. 
Embodiment 11
The device of embodiment 6 or 7, wherein the GDH has the following characteristics:
(1) activity as defined in any one of (a) to (c) of embodiment 6,
(2) substrate specificity: the reactivity to maltose is 2% or less, relative to the reactivity to D-glucose (100%);
(3) optimal activity pH: 6.5 to 7.5; and
(4) a molecular weight of about 65 to about 81 kDa when measured by SDS-PAGE.
Embodiment 12
The device of embodiment 6, 7 or 11, wherein the GDH is from a microorganism belonging to the genus Mucor, Absidia, Actinotnucor, Circinella, Parasitella or Rhizopus. 
Embodiment 13
The device of embodiment 12, wherein the GDH is a GDH from Mucor prainii, Mucor circinelloides, Mucor circinelioides f. cirinelloides, Mucor ambiguus, Mucor hiemalis, Mucor hiemalis f. silvaticus, Mucor subtilissimus, Mucor guilliermondii, Mucor javanicus, Mucor dimorphosporus, Mucor RD056860, Mucor subtilissimus, Absidia cylindrospora, Absidia hyalospora, Actinomucor elegans, Circinella minor, Circinella mucoroides, Circinella muscae, Circinella rigida, Circinella simplex, Circinella umbellata, Parasitella parasitica or Rhizopus microsporus. 
Advantageous Effects of Invention
An advantage of the present invention over conventional devices using GODs is that GDHs can be used with but less frequently or without fingerstick calibrations over the sensor's lifetime due to the long-term stability thereof. Most systems based on GOD require calibration once in every certain period of time, such as once in every 12 hours, during the sensor's lifetime. One of the reasons for this is that GOD activity diminishes rapidly during incubation at ambient temperatures (30-40° C.), the temperature at which CGM devices are used. By contrast, it was found by the present inventor that, surprisingly, GDH retains higher stability (enzyme activity) at ambient temperatures (30-40° C.) over a long period of time such as 1-3 weeks and can be used without re-calibration or with re-calibration but less frequently.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows residual enzyme activity of different types of GDH and GOD after heat treatment at 57° C. for 15 minutes.
FIG. 2 shows residual enzyme activity of different types of GDH and GOD after maintaining at 40° C. for up to 21 days.
FIG. 3 shows residual enzyme activity of different types of GDHs and GODs after maintaining at 40° C. for up to 7 days.
FIG. 4 shows residual enzyme activity of different types of GDHs after maintaining at 40° C. for up to 14 days.
FIG. 5 shows residual enzyme activity at 0 to 4 hours for GDH-M2 or GOD-3 immobilized electrode using PEI and PEGDE.
FIG. 6 shows residual enzyme activity at 0 to 4 hours for GDH-M2 or GOD-3 immobilized electrodes using PA and PEGDE.
FIG. 7 shows optimal pH of GDH-M2.
FIG. 8 shows optimal pH of GLD3.
FIG. 9 shows a cyclic voltammetry using the GDH-M2 electrode.
FIG. 10 shows glucose concentration dependency of the response current. Oxidation current value was recorded at 0.4V.
FIG. 11 shows SDS-PAGE of GDH-M2 and GLD3.



DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
1-1. Glucose Dehydrogenase Activity and Storage Stability
In one embodiment, the present invention provides a method of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) comprising using a GDH. In said method, a GDH capable of
(a) retaining about 60% or more, e.g., about 65% or more, about 70% or more, about 75% or more, about 80% or more, e.g., about 60-100%, about 60-99%, about 70-100%, 75-100%, or 80-100% of the initial activity for a period of 1 week when retained at about 37-40° C.,
(b) retaining about 40% or more, e.g., about 45% or more, about 50% or more, about 55% or more, about 60% or more, about 65% or more, e.g., about 40-100%, about 40-99%, about 45-100%, about 50-100%, about 55-100%, about 60-100%, or about 65-100% of the initial activity for a period of 2 weeks when retained at about 37-40° C., or
(c) retaining about 30% or more, e.g., about 35% or more, about 40% or more, about 45% or more, about 50% or more, about 55% or more, about 60% or more, e.g., about 30-100%, about 30-99%, about 40-100%, 45-100%, 50-100%, 55-100%, or about 60-100% of the initial activity for a period of 3 weeks when retained at about 37-40° C. may be used. Retaining GDH activity as above may be referred to herein as having (comprising) “storage stability”. However, the term “storage” here is merely used for convenience and should not be construed or interpreted in any limiting way. That is, the phrase “storage stability” is merely intended to explain a characteristic of the GDH, namely, that the GDH retains activity over a certain period of time at a certain temperature, and does not imply that the GDH should be physically stored or shelved. The GDH having the storage stability described above can be used in an electrode, a glucose sensor, or a CGM device or in a method comprising continuous glucose monitoring. In one embodiment, said GDH may be an FAD-dependent GDH. In one embodiment, said GDH may be a soluble type GDH or derived from a soluble type GDH. The phrase “soluble type GDH” herein refers to a GDH which is soluble in solution and is not a membrane bound protein (such as the B. cepacia GDH described in WO 2002/036779, US 2004/0023330). It should be noted however, that the phrase “soluble type GDH” herein merely describes the “type” of GDH (or the origin of the GDH) and does not indicate that the GDH must physically be in solution. The soluble type GDH may be stored in dry state or immobilized onto an electrode. The type of such immobilized GDH may still be referred to herein as soluble type. In another embodiment, said GDH is not a membrane bound protein and does not comprise a cytochrome domain. In another embodiment, said GDH is not an FAD-GDH composed of three subunits capable of forming a complex non-covalently. The FAD-GDH from B. cepacia (WO 2002/036779, US 2004/0023330) is composed of three subunits capable of forming a complex non-covalently and this B. cepacia GDH is excluded from the GDHs used in the present methods and devices. In another embodiment, said GDH of the present invention is composed of one subunit, although this does not exclude the possibility of being fused covalently to one or more a cytochrome domains. In yet another embodiment, said GDH is not a PQQ-dependent GDH. In yet another embodiment, said GDH is not a NAD dependent GDH. In one embodiment, said GDH is a monomer. In one embodiment, said GDH is not a dimer. In one embodiment, the storage stability of the GDH may be assessed at a pH of about 7.0 to 7.5, e.g., about pH 7.4.
The GDH may retain activity as described in (a) to (c) above at a temperature of about 37-40° C., e.g., about 37° C., about 38° C., about 39° C., or about 40° C.
Preferably, a GDH relatively stable under harsh temperature conditions may be used. In one embodiment, a GDH which retains about 20% or more, e.g., about 20-100%, of its initial GDH activity after 15 minutes of heat treatment of at 57° C., pH 7.0 may be used.
In one embodiment, the GDH may be from a microorganism belonging to the genus Mucor, Absidia, Actinotnucor and Circinella. In another embodiment, the GDH may be a GDH from Mucor prainii, Mucor circinelloides, Mucor circinelioides f. cirinelloides, Mucor ambiguus, Mucor hiemalis, Mucor hiemalis f. silvaticus, Mucor subtilissimus, Mucor guilliermondii, Mucor javanicus, Mucor dimorphosporus, Mucor RD056860, Mucor subtilissimus, Absidia cylindrospora, Absidia hyalospora, Actinomucor elegans, Circinella minor, Circinella mucoroides, Circinella muscae, Circinella rigida, Circinella simplex, Circinella umbellata, Parasitella parasitica or Rhizopus microsporus. In another embodiment, the GDH may comprise mutations which alter characteristics thereof.
In one embodiment, the GDH used in the CGM method of the present invention may retain a higher enzyme activity over a long period of time such as 1-3 weeks compared to known GODs currently being used in conventional CGM systems. The residual activity ratio of a GDH or GOD enzyme is defined herein as follows:

Residual activity ratio=(residual activity A after 3 weeks at about 37-40° C.)/(initial activity B)×100

Residual activity and initial activity of the same enzyme should be measured under identical assay conditions. In one embodiment, the residual activity and initial activity may be measured at a pH suitable for CGM such as pH 6.9 to 7.4, e.g., pH 7.0.
The pH of the CGM method may be adjusted to about 6.9 to 7.4, e.g., about 7.0. This is because the pH of blood is about 7.0. The pH may be adjusted using a phosphate buffer such as PBS or other conventional buffers.
In one embodiment, the residual activity ratio of the GDH used in the present invention is preferably higher than that of a known GOD enzyme used in a CGM system. Such known GOD enzyme may be a GOD from a microorganism belonging to the genus Aspergillus such as Aspergillus niger or Aspergillus sp. Such known GOD enzyme may be selected from the group consisting of Toyobo GOD (catalogue No. GLO-201, from Aspergillus sp.), Wako Pure Chemicals GOD (catalogue No. 074-02401, from Aspergillus niger), Sigma-Aldrich GOD type VII (GOD from Aspergillus niger), and Sigma-Aldrich GOD type X-S (GOD from Aspergillus niger).
In one embodiment, continuous glucose monitoring can be carried out with or without re-calibration. In an embodiment, continuous glucose monitoring can be carried out infrequently, e.g., with re-calibration once in every 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 or 14 days.
In another embodiment, the present invention provides a method for screening a GDH capable of being used in continuous glucose monitoring. This method comprises the steps of:
(i) preparing a candidate GDH,
(ii) retaining said candidate GDH at about 30-40° C., e.g., about 37-40° C. for a predetermined period,
(iii) determining the residual activity of said GDH after step (ii), and
(iv) comparing the residual activity determined in step (iii) with the initial activity of said candidate GDH. When the residual GDH activity is
(a) about 60% or more, e.g., about 65% or more, about 70% or more, about 75% or more, about 80% or more, e.g., about 60-100%, about 60-99%, about 70-100%, 75-100%, or 80-100% compared to the initial GDH activity when retained at about 30-40° C., e.g., about 37-40° C. for a period of 1 week,
(b) about 40% or more, e.g., about 45% or more, about 50% or more, about 55% or more, about 60% or more, about 65% or more, e.g., about 40-100%, about 40-99%, about 45-100%, about 50-100%, about 55-100%, about 60-100%, or about 65-100% compared to the initial GDH activity when retained at about 30-40° C., e.g., about 37-40° C. for a period of 2 weeks, or
(c) about 30% or more, e.g., about 35% or more, about 40% or more, about 45% or more, about 50% or more, about 55% or more, about 60% or more, e.g., about 30-100%, about 30-99%, about 40-100%, 45-100%, 50-100%, 55-100%, or about 60-100% compared to the initial GDH activity when retained at about 30-40° C., e.g., about 37-40° C. for a period of 3 weeks,
then said candidate GDH can be selected as a GDH suitable for continuous glucose monitoring or as a GDH having the potential to be used in CGM, e.g., in CGM for over a period of 1 to 3 weeks. In step (ii) above, the candidate GDH may be retained at about 30-40° C., e.g., about 37-40° C. for a period of e.g., 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 12 hours, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7 days, or 1, 2 or 3 weeks, when carrying out the screening. CGM is typically carried out at temperatures of about 30-40° C., in part since the average body temperature is about 37° C. Thus, screening of the GDH may be carried out at about 30-40° C., e.g., about 37-40° C., about 30° C., about 31° C., about 32° C., about 33° C., about 34° C., about 35° C., about 36° C., about 37° C., about 38° C., about 39° C., or about 40° C.
The candidate GDH may be a GDH from a microorganism belonging to the genus Mucor, or a derivative, variant or mutant thereof. The candidate GDH may be a GDH having low specificity towards maltose, D-galactose and/or D-xylose. The candidate GDH may be a heat stable GDH (thermally stable GDH), although it is not required to be more heat stable than GODs used in CGM devices under accelerated test conditions. In one embodiment, the candidate GDH of step (i) preferably retains about 20% or more, e.g., about 20-100%, of its initial GDH activity after 15 minutes of heat treatment of at 57° C., pH 7.0.
In order to screen for a GDH having the potential to be used in CGM, it may appear feasible according to conventional wisdom to carry out an accelerated heat treatment step on the candidate GDH enzymes instead of carrying out a full term a stability test over the entire lifetime of a CGM device, such as over 1-3 weeks. However, the present inventor surprisingly found that multiple GDHs retain higher stability at ambient temperatures over a long period of time compared to commercially available GODs under similar conditions. This was particularly surprising in view of the fact that known GODs retained higher activities than GDHs in accelerated tests employing heat treatment at 57° C. Therefore, in one embodiment of the present invention, it may be preferable not to replace step (ii) above with an accelerated test comprising a heat treatment step such as heat treatment at a temperature of about 50-60° C., at about 5-30 minutes.
In one embodiment, the present invention provides a continuous glucose monitoring device comprising a GDH capable of
(a) retaining 60% or more, e.g., about 65% or more, about 70% or more, about 75% or more, about 80% or more, e.g., about 60-100%, about 60-99%, about 70-100%, 75-100%, or 80-100% of the initial activity for a period of 1 week when retained at about 37-40° C.,
(b) retaining 40% or more, e.g., about 45% or more, about 50% or more, about 55% or more, about 60% or more, about 65% or more, e.g., about 40-100%, about 40-99%, about 45-100%, about 50-100%, about 55-100%, about 60-100%, or about 65-100% of the initial activity for a period of 2 weeks when retained at about 37-40° C., or
(c) retaining 30% or more, e.g., about 35% or more, about 40% or more, about 45% or more, about 50% or more, about 55% or more, about 60% or more, e.g., about 30-100%, about 30-99%, about 40-100%, 45-100%, 50-100%, 55-100%, or about 60-100% of the initial activity for a period of 3 weeks when retained at about 37-40° C.,
wherein said GDH is an FAD dependent GDH and wherein said GDH is not a membrane bound protein. In one embodiment, said GDH is not a PQQ dependent GDH.
In terms of monitoring glucose over a certain time period, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) may also be referred to as flash glucose monitoring (FGM). As such, the phrase “continuous glucose monitoring”, as used herein with regard to embodiments of the present invention, encompass embodiments of flash glucose monitoring, unless clearly indicated otherwise.
In one embodiment, the device comprises a GDH which preferably retains about 20% or more, e.g., about 20-100%, of its initial GDH activity after 15 minutes of heat treatment of at 57° C., pH 7.0.
In one embodiment, the CGM device may comprise a glucose sensor to be placed under the skin. The sensor may be worn for a certain time period such as from one day to about 3 weeks. The sensor portion may be disposable. The sensor may comprise a sensor membrane layer to prevent direct tissue contact with the enzyme. The sensor may be designed to be inserted into the abdomen by using an applicator. In one embodiment, the present invention provides a CGM device further comprising a transmitter and a link from the sensor to the transmitter. The transmitter need not be implanted. Preferably, the transmitter is capable of communicating to a radio receiver. The CGM device may further comprise an electronic receiver that may continuously display glucose levels. The CGM device may optionally comprise a fingerstick (fingerprick) for calibration. The CGM device may optionally comprise a manual for use. In one embodiment, the CGM device may be self-powered (SPGS) and the reference electrode may be omitted.
FAD-GDH catalyzes a reaction in which the hydroxyl group of glucose is oxidized in the presence of an electron acceptor to form glucono-δ-lactone.
This reaction can be used to measure the activity of an FAD-GDH, for example, by using the following system that utilized phenazine methosulfate (PMS) and 2,6-dichloroindophenol (DCIP) as electron acceptors.

D-glucose+PMS (oxidized form)→D-glucono-δ-lactone+PMS (reduced form) (catalyzed by FAD-GDH)   (Reaction 1)

PMS (reduced form)+DCIP (oxidized form)→PMS (oxidized form)+DCIP (reduced form)  (Reaction 2)

In Reaction 1, glucose is oxidized and reduced form PMS is produced. In subsequent Reaction 2, the reduced form PMS is oxidized and DCIP is reduced. By detecting the degree of decrease in oxidized form DCIP, by way of change in optical absorbance at a wavelength of 600 nm, GDH enzyme activity can be determined.
Activity of FAD-GDH can be measured as follows. 2.05 mL of 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.6 mL or 1 M D-glucose solution and 0.15 mL of 2 mM DCIP solution are mixed and then incubated at 37° C. for 5 minutes. Then, 0.1 mL of 15 mM PMS solution and 0.1 mL of enzyme sample solution are added to initiate the reaction. Optical absorbance is measured at the initial conditions and over time, decrease in optical absorbance at 600 nm (ΔA600) per minute is determined, and GDH activity can be computed accordingly. 1 U of GDH activity can be defined as the amount of enzyme that reduces 1 μmol of DCIP in one minute in the presence of D-glucose at a concentration of 200 mM at 37° C.



 
  
   GDH
   ⁢
      
   activity
   ⁢
      
   
    (
    
     U
     /
     mL
    
    )
   
  
  =
  
   
    
     -
     
      (
      
       
        Δ
        ⁢
        A
        ⁢
        600
       
       -
       
        Δ
        ⁢
        A
        ⁢
        
         600
         blank
        
       
      
      )
     
    
    ×
    3.
    ×
    df
   
   
    16.3
    ×
    0.1
    ×
    1.
   
  
 



The value 3.0 in the equation represents the amount of the reaction reagent and enzyme reagent (mL), 16.3 represents the millimolar molecular extinction coefficient (cm2/μmol), 0.1 represents the amount of the enzyme solution (mL), 1.0 represents the cell length (cm), Δ600blank represents the amount of decrease in blank optical absorbance per minute at 600 nm where only the buffer is added to initiate the reaction instead of adding the enzyme solution, and df represents the dilution factor.
The GDH used in the present methods may have glucose dehydrogenase activity and storage stability as described above. Equivalents thereof may also be used.
1-2. Substrate Specificity
The GDH used in the present methods may have high substrate specificity. In one embodiment, the GDH may have low reactivity at least to maltose compared to the reactivity to glucose (D-glucose). In another embodiment, the GDH may have low reactivity at least to maltose and xylose (D-xylose), compared to the reactivity to glucose (D-glucose). In one embodiment, the GDH used in the present methods has reactivity to maltose of, for example, 2% or less, preferably 1% or less, more preferably 0.7% or less, more preferably 0.4% or less, relative to the reactivity to glucose at the same concentration (100%). In one embodiment, the GDH used in the present methods may have reactivity to xylose, for example, of 3% or less, more preferably 2% or less, more preferably 1 or less, more preferably 0.6% or less, relative to the reactivity to glucose at the same concentration (100%). In another embodiment, the GDH may have low reactivity at least to galactose, compared to the reactivity to glucose (D-glucose). In one embodiment, the GDH used in the present methods may have reactivity to galactose, for example, of 5% or less, 4% or less, 3% or less, 2% or less, or 1 or less, relative to the reactivity to glucose at the same concentration (100%).
Reactivity of GDH used in the present methods to each sugar can be measured by replacing glucose with another sugar such as xylose or maltose in the method for measuring the glucose dehydrogenase activity described herein, and comparing the measured activity with that obtained with glucose. For example, the concentration of each sugar can be set as 200 mM. Further, when reactivity to glucose is measured, the final enzyme concentration of the reaction liquid can be set as 1.4 μg/mL and when reactivity to xylose or maltose is measured, the final enzyme concentration of the reaction liquid can be set as 28 μg/mL. The GDH used in the present methods having such high substrate specificity can be used as an enzyme for accurately measuring the glucose concentration of a sample, for example, even when the sample contains impurities, such as maltose or xylose.
1-3. Optimal pH
The GDH used in the present methods may have a broad optimal pH activity range. Since CGM is carried out on blood and interstitial fluid, it is preferable for the GDH enzyme used in the method to have an optimal pH around neutral pH (pH 7.0). In one embodiment, the GDH used in the present methods may have, for example, optimal pH activity at a pH of from 5.0 to 7.5, preferably from 5.5 to 7.5, more preferably from 6.0 to 7.5, more preferably from 6.5 to 7.5. In another embodiment, the GDH used in the present methods may have optimal pH activity at a pH of from 5.0 to 8, preferably from 5.5 to 7.5, more preferably from 6.0 to 7.5, more preferably from 6.5 to 7.5. Such GDHs are shown in the examples. In one embodiment, optimal pH may be considered as a relative activity of 70% or more relative to the highest activity (100%). In another embodiment, optimal pH may be considered as a relative activity of 75% or more, for example 80% or more relative to the highest activity (100%). In one embodiment, the GDH used in the present methods has an optimal pH of 6.0 to 7.5 wherein optimal activity is 70% or more activity relative to the highest activity (100%).
Optical absorbance is measured at the initial conditions and over time, decrease in optical absorbance at 520 nm (ΔA520) per minute is determined, and GDH activity can be computed accordingly. 6.8 represents the millimolar molecular extinction coefficient (cm2/μmol). The molar adsorption coefficient of DCIP at 600 nm is known to vary to a large degree depending on the pH. The molar adsorption coefficient of DCIP at 520 nm is known to be fairly constant regardless of pH. Measurements can be made at 520 nm by taking this into account.
1-4. Optimal Activity Temperature
The GDH used in the present methods may have an optimal activity temperature over a broad range, for example, of 30 to 50° C., 30 to 55° C., 35 to 50° C., 35 to 55° C., 35 to 60° C., or 30 to 60° C. The optimal activity temperature of 30 to 60° C. herein typically means that the temperature is more or less within a range of about 30 to 60° C., and the range further includes an acceptable allowance to some extent, while the activity is optimal. In the present specification, optimal activity temperature can be computed by measuring the enzyme activity in a potassium phosphate buffer solution (pH of 7.0) at a final enzyme concentration of the reaction liquid (1.4 μg/mL).
1-5. pH Stability
The GDH used in the present methods may have high pH stability over a broad range of pH. In one embodiment, the GDH used in the present methods is stable at least within the entire pH range of 5.0 to 7.5. In the present specification, when 100 U/mL of enzyme that has been treated at 25° C. for 16 hours under specific pH conditions has residual enzyme activity of 75% or more compared to the initial enzyme activity of the same enzyme before treatment (100%), the enzyme is considered to be stable under such pH condition.
1-6. Temperature Stability
The GDH used in the present methods may have temperature stability. In one embodiment, the GDH used in the present methods is, for example, stable least at 50° C. or less (i.e., within a temperature range of 0 to 50° C.), 51° C. or less, 52° C. or less, 53° C. or less, 54° C. or less, 55° C. or less 56° C. or less, or 57° C. or less for 15 minutes. In the present specification, when 10 U/mL of enzyme that has been treated for 15 minutes in an appropriate buffer solution (e.g., potassium acetate buffer (pH of 5.0)) under specific temperature conditions has remaining enzyme activity of 20% or more compared to the initial enzyme activity of the same enzyme prior to heat treatment (100%), the enzyme is considered to be stable under such temperature condition.
The GDH used in the present methods may have at least one or more, 2 or more, 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more or all six of the enzyme characteristics described above. The GDH used in the present methods may have any combination of the characteristics described above. In one embodiment, that the GDH used in the present methods may have the characteristic described in Section 1-1, and further at least one characteristic selected from the group consisting of the characteristics described in Sections 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-5, and 1-6 above.
1-7. Molecular Weight
In one embodiment, the polypeptide moiety constituting the GDH used in the present methods may have a molecular weight of about 65 to 81 kDa, about 65 to 80 kDa, about 65 to 75 kDa, about 65 to 70 kDa or about 70 kDa as measured by SDS-PAGE. The phrase “about 70 kDa as measured by SDS-PAGE” includes a range in which a person artisan would usually determine that the band is present at a position of 70 kDa when the molecular weight of the polypeptide is measured by SDS-PAGE. The skilled artisan will appreciate that the band appearing on an SDS-PAGE may vary 5 kD above or below the expected value depending on the conditions. “Polypeptide moiety” refers to the polypeptide moiety of GDH and does not include attached sugar chains.
In one embodiment, the polypeptide moiety constituting the GDH used in the present methods may have a theoretical molecular weight of about 65 to 80 kDa, about 65 to 75 kDa, about 65 to 70 kDa, about 69 to 70 kDa or about 70 kDa as deduced from the amino acid sequence. The phrase “theoretical molecular weight of about 70 kDa as deduced from the amino acid sequence” refers to the molecular weight of the GDH computed from the amino acid sequence. This does not include attached sugar chains.
When producing the GDH used in the present methods using certain microorganisms, the GDH maybe expressed in glycosylated form. In one embodiment, regarding glycosylated forms of GDH, heat treatment or deglycosylating treatment may be carried out to remove sugar chains to provide the polypeptide moiety. Deglycosylation may be carried out using a glycohydrolase such as EndoH endoglycosidase. When producing the GDH used in the present methods using certain other microorganisms, the GDH may be expressed in non-glycosylated form. For such form, the expressed GDH is the polypeptide moiety.
Various methods are known for removing sugar chains from glycosylated form GDHs. One example may be to denature the glycosylated GDH by heat treatment at 100° C. for 10 minutes, followed by treatment with the endoglycosidase Endo H at 37° C. for 14 hours. One example may be to denature the glycosylated GDH by treatment with the endoglycosidase Endo H at 37° C. for 24 hours.
Where the GDH used in the present method has attached sugar chains, the molecular weight thereof is not limited so long as there is no adverse effect on the glucose dehydrogenase activity, substrate specificity, specific activity, and the like. For example, when the GDH used in the present method has attached sugar chains, the molecular weight thereof may be 80 to 120 kDa as measured by SDS-PAGE. The GDH used in the present method may or may not be a glycosylated form. The molecular weight measurement by SDS-PAGE may be performed using conventional techniques and devices with the use of commercially available molecular weight markers.
In one embodiment, that the GDH used in the present methods may have the characteristic described in Section 1-1, and further at least one characteristic selected from the group consisting of the characteristics described in Sections 1-2 to 1-7 above.
1-8. Origin
The origin of the GDH used in the present methods is not particularly limited as long as the GDH has the characteristics described above. The GDH used in the present method can be derived from, for example, microorganisms belonging to members of the subphylum Mueoromyeotina, members of the class Mucoromycetes, members of the order Mucorales, members of the family Mucoraceae. Specific examples include Mucor species, Absidia species, Actinotnucor species and Circinella species. Examples of Mucor species include Mucor prainii, Mucor javanicus, Mucor circinelioides f. cirinelloides, Mucor ambiguus, Mucor guilliermondii, Mucor hiemalis f. silvaticus, Mucor subtilissimus and Mucor dimorphosporous. Examples of Absidia species include Absidia cylindrospora and Absidia hyalospora. Examples of Actinomucor species include Actinomucor elegans. Examples of Circinella species include Circinella minor, Circinella mucoroides, Circinella muscae, Circinella rigida, Circinella simplex and Circinella umbellata. Further examples include those described in WO2010/140431, US 2011/0318810. Further examples include Parasitella parasitica and Rhizopus microsporus. 
Other origins may be the genus Arthrinium and the genus Apiospora. Examples of the genus Arthrinium include, but are not limited to, Arthrinium japonicum, Arthrinium phaeospermum, Arthrinium terminalis, Arthrinium saccharicola, Arthrinium sacchari, Arthrinium serenense, Arthrinium arundinis, Arthrinium euphaubie. Examples of the genus Apiospora include, but are not limited to, Apiospora montagnei, Apiospora setosa, and Apiospora tintinnabula and Arthrinium sacchari. For microorganisms of the genus Arthrinium and the genus Apiospora, see U.S. Pat. No. 9,796,963, incorporated herein in its entirety.
Other origins include, but are not limited to, members of the Metarhizium genus, for example, Metarhizium sp., for example, Metarhizium sp. F2114 (HyphaGenesis Inc.) (see JP Patent Application Publication No. 2016-116488, incorporated herein in its entirety); members of the Aspergillus genus, for example, Aspergillus sp. RD009469 (see WO 2015/060150, incorporated herein in its entirety), Aspergillus iizukae, for example Aspergillus iizukae No. 5453 strain (see WO 2017/077924, incorporated herein in its entirety), Aspergillus versicolor, for example Aspergillus versicolor No. 52439 strain (see JP Patent Application Publication No. 2017-221147, incorporated herein in its entirety); Aspergillus kawachii, Aspergillus awamori, e.g., Aspergillus awamori No. 1731 strain (see JP Patent Application Publication No. 2017-112860, incorporated herein in its entirety); Aspergillus foetidus, e.g., Aspergillus foetidus NBRC4312 strain (NBRC), Aspergillus niger CBS 513.88 strain (Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures: CBS), Aspergillus awamori No. 1751 strain, Aspergillus aureus, e.g., Aspergillus aureus No. 2062 strain (see JP Patent Application Publication No. 2017-112858, incorporated herein in its entirety), Aspergillus bisporus, e.g., Aspergillus bisporus NBRC32017 strain (NBRC); Thermoascus aurantiacus, e.g., Thermoascus aurantiacus strain 6766, Thermoascus aurantiacus strain 9748 (see JP Patent Application Publication No. 2015-167506, incorporated herein in its entirety); and Talaromyces emersonii, e.g., Talaromyces emersonii 31232 strain and 9734 strain, Thermoascus crustaceus, e.g., Thermoascus crustaceus 9129 strain and 9816 strain and other microorganisms disclosed in Table 1 of WO 2014/045912 (see WO 2014/045912, incorporated herein in its entirety) as well as Botryothinia fuckeliana (see WO 2012/001976, incorporated herein in its entirety).
In one embodiment, an FAD-GDH can be obtained, for example, by initially obtaining a known GDH gene such as the GDH gene described in Patent document 1 (WO 2015/099112, US20160319246), Patent document 8 (WO2012/169512, US20140287445) or Patent document 9 (WO 2015/129475, EP3112461). The obtained gene may or may not be mutated. Mutations may be any mutation such as those described in these documents or corresponding mutations. In one embodiment, the GDH from Mucor prainii (MpGDH, SEQ ID NO:1) may be modified by introducing mutations N66Y/N68G/C88A/Q233R/T387C/E554D/L557V/S559K thereto.
Other mutations may also be applied, such as mutations described in the literature. Amino acid substitutions may be indicated herein with the abbreviation “aXXXb” (wherein a is the amino acid prior to substitution, XXX is the position within a particular amino acid sequence being substituted and b is the amino acid post substitution). For example, A175C with regard to SEQ ID NO:1 represents the substitution where alanine at position 175 of SEQ ID NO:1 is replaced with cysteine.
In another embodiment, the GDH designated as GLD3 (Funakoshi) or equivalents thereof can be used in CGM. In another embodiment, a GDH derived from the Mucor hiemalis GDH can be used in CGM. In another embodiment, the GDH designated MpGDH-M2 (SEQ ID NO: 11) can be used in CGM.
Examples of methods for introducing target amino acid substitutions include methods in which a mutation is introduced randomly and methods in which a site-directed mutation is introduced at a designated position. Examples of Random mutagenesis methods include Error-Prone PCR Methods (Techniques, 1, 11-15 (1989)) and methods using XL1-Red competent cells, in which errors frequently occur during plasmid replication and which are susceptible to occurrence of modification during cell proliferation (Stratagene Corp.). Examples of site directed mutagenesis methods include methods comprising selecting an amino acid which may confer a target effect, and introducing a site-directed mutation using conventional kits such as the commercially available Quick Change Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene Corp.).
In order to obtain an FAD-GDH gene, chromosomal DNA or mRNA can be extracted from known microbial cells or various other cells having the ability to produce FAD-GDH using conventional methods such as those described in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Wiley Interscience (1989)). Further, cDNA can be synthesized by using mRNA as a template. A chromosomal DNA or cDNA library can then be prepared using chromosomal DNA or cDNA so obtained.
Subsequently, DNA containing target gene fragments encoding FAD-GDH having high substrate specificity may be amplified, said DNA fragments may be connected, and DNA containing the entire FAD-GDH gene can be obtained. Connection of the DNA fragments may be carried out by synthesizing a suitable probe DNA based on amino acid sequence information of a known FAD-GDH, using the probe DNA to select an FAD-GDH gene having high substrate specificity from a chromosomal DNA or cDNA library, or using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method such as 5′ RACE or 3′ RACE by preparing suitable primer DNA based on the amino acid sequence and linking the DNA fragments.
A gene encoding FAD-GDH may be used as the starting material and screening of mutants can be carried out by selecting clones expressing preferable FAD-GDHs.
Mutants may be produced by exposing an FAD-GDH gene or cell comprising said gene to mutagens or to ultraviolet radiation, or carry out genetic engineering methods that cause mutagenesis.
Examples of mutagens include N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, hydroxylamine, nitrous acid, sulfurous acid, hydrazine, formic acid and 5-bromouracil among others. In the case of irradiating with ultraviolet light, irradiation can be carried out using conventional techniques as described in Chemistry Today, 24-30, June 1989.
Examples of site-specific mutagenesis include the Kunkel method (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 82, 488 (1985); Methods Enzymol., 154, 367 (1987)), the Eckstein method (Nucleic Acids Res., 13, 8749 (1985); Nucleic Acids Res., 13, 8765 (1985); Nucleic Acids Res., 14, 9679 (1986)), and the Kramer method (Nucleic Acids Res., 12, 9441 (1984); Methods Enzymol., 154, 350 (1987); Gene, 37, 73 (1985)). Commercially available kits (such as the Transformer Mutagenesis Kit (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.), ExOIII/Mung Bean Deletion Kit (Stratagene Corp.) or Quick Change Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene Corp.)) may be used to transform a DNA sequence.
Further, a FAD-GDH gene may be obtained by using DNA synthesis methods. The gene may be designed to comprise the gene sequence of a naturally occurring GDH or may have mutations.
The DNA sequence of a GDH gene may be sequenced using conventional sequencing techniques and commercially available systems such as the Multi-Capillary DNA Analysis System CEQ2000 (Beckman Coulter Inc.) may be used.
An FAD-GDH can be acquired by obtaining a naturally occurring FAD-GDH or by modifying a known FAD-GDH. Examples of microorganisms comprising an FAD-GDH include members of the subphylum Mueoromyeotina, members of the class Mucoromycetes, members of the order Mucorales, members of the family Mucoraceae. Specific examples include Mucor species, Absidia species, Actinotnucor species and Circinella species.
Examples of Mucor species include Mucor prainii, Mucor javanicus, Mucor circinelioides f. cirinelloides, Mucor ambiguus, Mucor guilliermondii, Mucor hiemalis f. silvaticus, Mucor subtilissimus and Mucor dimorphosporous. Examples of Absidia species include Absidia cylindrospora and Absidia hyalospora. Examples of Actinomucor species include Actinomucor elegans. Examples of Circinella species include Circinella minor, Circinella mucoroides, Circinella muscae, Circinella rigida, Circinella simplex and Circinella umbellata. Further examples include those described in WO2010/140431, US 2011/0318810. Further examples include Parasitella parasitica and Rhizopus microsporus. Further examples include those described above.
An FAD-GDH gene can be incorporated into a vector such as a bacteriophage, cosmid or plasmid and these can be used to transform a prokaryotic cell or eukaryotic cell using conventional methods.
Examples of prokaryotic host cells include microorganisms belonging to the genus Escherichia such as Escherichia coli strain K-12, Escherichia coli BL21(DE3), Escherichia coli JM109, Escherichia coli DH50α, Escherichia coli W3110 or Escherichia coli C600 (Takara Bio Inc.). Cells can be transformed or transduced using CaCl2 methods or electroporation methods. Commercially available competent cells (such as ECOS Competent Escherichia coli BL21(DE3), Nippon Gene Co., Ltd.) may be employed.
Examples of eukaryotic host cells include yeasts such as those of the genus Zygosaccharomyces, genus Saccharomyces, genus Pichia and genus Candida. Marker genes may be used to identify transformed cells.
Examples of marker genes include genes that complement the nutritional requirements of the host such as URA3 or TRP 1. Further, the inserted gene may comprise a promoter or other control sequence (such as an enhancer sequence, terminator sequence or polyadenylation sequence). Examples of promoters include the GAL1 promoter and ADH1 promoter. Yeast may be transformed using conventional methods such as, without limitation, the lithium acetate method (Methods Mol. Cell. Biol., 5, 255-269 (1995)) or electroporation method (J. Microbiol. Methods, 55, 481-484 (2003)). Alternatively, methods such as the spheroplast method or glass bead method may be used.
Further examples of eukaryotic host cells include molds such as those of Aspergillus species and Tricoderma species. The inserted gene may comprise a promoter, such as the tef1 promoter, and other control sequences (such as a secretion signal sequence, enhancer sequence, terminator sequence or polyadenylation sequence). Further, the inserted gene may also comprise a marker gene such as niaD or pyrG to select a transformed cell. Further, the inserted gene may comprise homologous recombination domains for insertion into the chromosome. Known methods such as the method described by Unkles et al., (Mol. Gen. Genet., 218, 99-104 (1989)) using polyethylene glycol and calcium chloride following protoplast formation may be employed to transform molds.
An FAD-GDH may be produced by culturing a host cell capable of producing FAD-GDH and collecting FAD-GDH from the culture.
Examples of media to culture the host cells include media comprising one or more types of inorganic salts such as sodium chloride, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, magnesium sulfate, magnesium chloride, ferric chloride, ferric sulfide or manganese sulfate and one or more type of nitrogen source such as yeast extract, tryptone, peptone, beef extract, corn steep liquor, or soybean or wheat bran extract. The medium may further comprise carbohydrate sources or vitamins where necessary. The initial pH of the medium may be adjusted to a pH of 6 to 9 although not limited to this range.
Culturing may be carried out by aeration-agitation submerged culturing, shake culturing or static culturing for 1 hours to 4 days or more at a culturing temperature of e.g., 10-42° C., such as 25° C. or 37° C.
After culturing, the FAD-GDH may be collected from the culture. This may be carried out using conventional methods. In one example, microbial cells can be pulverized using ultrasonication or ground or milled, the enzyme can be extracted using a lytic enzyme such as lysozyme or yatalase, or the enzyme can be released from the cells by lysing the cells with agitation or exposing the cells to toluene. A crude FAD-GDH may then be obtained by filtering the solution, the solid fraction may be removed by centrifugation, nucleic acids may be removed with streptomycin hydrochloride, protamine sulfate or manganese sulfate where necessary, ammonium sulfate, alcohol or acetone may be used for fractionation and the precipitate may be collected.
The crude FAD-GDH enzyme can be purified using conventional means. Purification can be carried out using gel filtration methods using a gel such as Sephadex (Registered Trademark), Ultrogel (Registered Trademark) or Biogel (Registered Trademark), adsorption elution methods using ion exchange resins, electrophoresis methods using polyacrylamide gels, adsorption elution methods using hydroxyapatite, precipitation methods such as sucrose density gradient centrifugation, affinity chromatography methods, or fractionating methods using a molecular sieve membrane or hollow fiber membrane, or a combination thereof.
Measurement of glucose concentration can be carried out using a colorimetric glucose assay kit. A composition containing an FAD-GDH, an electron acceptor and a reaction accelerator can be used. Agents selected from the group consisting of N-(2-acetamido)iminodiacetic acid (ADA), bis(2-hydroxyethyl)iminotris(hydroxymethyl)methane (Bis-Tris), sodium carbonate and imidazole may be retained in the reaction layer of a glucose assay kit. Optionally, a pH buffer or coloring reagent may be added. A sample containing glucose is then added and reaction is allowed to take place for a certain amount of time. During reaction, optical absorbance is monitored.
The optical absorbance corresponds to an absorption wavelength, preferably to the maximum absorption wavelength of an electron acceptor that is discolored by reduction, or a pigment formed by polymerization as a result of accepting electrons from an electron acceptor.
Glucose concentration in the sample can be computed with reference to a calibration curve produced by using glucose solutions with known standard concentrations. In a rate change method, the concentration may be computed based on the rate of change in absorbance per unit time. In an endpoint method, the concentration may be computed based on the point at which all glucose in the sample has been consumed (oxidized).
In one example employing a mediator and a coloring reagent, glucose can be quantified by adding 2,6-dichloroindophenol (DCIP) as an electron acceptor followed by monitoring the decrease in absorbance at 600 nm. Further, glucose concentration can be computed by adding an electron acceptor in the form of phenazine methosulfate (PMS) and a coloring reagent in the form of nitrotetrazolium blue (NTB) followed by determining the amount of diformazan formed by measuring absorbance at 570 nm. Other electron acceptors and coloring reagents may of course be used.
Glucose Sensor Comprising FAD-GDH
In one embodiment, a glucose sensor comprising an FAD-GDH is provided. In one embodiment, the glucose sensor comprises a working electrode comprising the FAD-GDH, a reference electrode and a counter electrode. An electrode such as a carbon electrode, palladium electrode, gold electrode or platinum electrode may be used for the working electrode, and the FAD-GDH may be immobilized on the working electrode. The type of FAD-GDH to immobilize may be a soluble type FAD-GDH. Alternatively, or in addition, the electron mediator may be immobilized on the working electrode. The counter electrode may be a conventional electrode such as a platinum electrode or Pt/C electrode. The reference electrode may be a conventional electrode such as an Ag/AgCl electrode.
Examples of immobilization methods include methods using cross-linkers, methods comprising embedding in a polymer matrix, methods comprising covering with a dialysis membrane, and methods utilizing photo-cross-linkable polymers, electrically conductive polymers and oxidation-reduction polymers. Alternatively, the FAD-GDH may be immobilized in a polymer together with an electron mediator such as ferrocene or a derivative thereof, immobilized by adsorbing onto the electrode, or a combination thereof. In a typical method, the FAD-GDH may be immobilized on a carbon electrode using glutaraldehyde followed by blocking of glutaraldehyde using a reagent comprising an amino group. Another method may be to use polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (PEGDE) as the cross-linker. The molecular weight of PEGDE is not limited and any type may be used.
Methods for producing a glucose sensor can be found in the literature, such as Liu, et. al, Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 3403-3409 and Tsujimura, et. al, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 14432-14437 (both incorporated by reference in their entirety). Disclosed methods may be modified by using a GDH in place of GOD. For example, a redox polymer, such as a polymer containing an osmium complex can be mixed with another polymer such as polyethylene glycol and a GDH in a suitable buffer such as HEPES buffer to prepare a glucose sensing reagent. The osmium complex may be an osmium complexed with one or several organic molecules including a bipyridine molecule such as 2,2′-bipyridine, a biimidazole molecule such as 2,2′-biimidazole, a pyridine-imidazole compound such as 2-(2-pyridyl)imidazole or combinations thereof. The organic molecules which form the complex may optionally be substituted with an alkyl group, such as a C1-C6 alkyl, such as a methyl or ethyl group. In one embodiment, the osmium complex may be as follows:
(Os organic molecule complex)-(Polymer)
One of the organic molecules which form the complex may optionally be attached to a polymer via a linker. Therefore, in another embodiment, the osmium complex may be as follows:
(Os organic molecule complex)-(Linker)-(Polymer)
Exemplary molecules are disclosed in the literature such as in Ohara, et al, Anal Chem. 1993 Dec. 1; 65(23):3512-7 and Antiochia et al, Materials Sciences and Applications Vol. 4 No. 7 A2(2013) (both incorporated by reference in their entirety). Examples of polymers containing an osmium complex include osmium bis(2,2′-bipyridine)chloride complexed poly(1-vinylimidazole), osmium bis(2,2′-bipyridine)chloride complexed poly(4-vinylpiridine), poly(1-vinylimidazole)n-[osmium(4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridyl)2Cl2]2+/+, and derivatives thereof.
The solution may be deposited on a carbon sensor to form an active electrode area serving as the working electrode comprising redox polymer-wired GDH. A mixture of membrane polymer and cross-linker solutions can be added to form a membrane on the sensor. The membrane may comprise a polymer such as poly(1-vinylimidazole), poly(4-vinylpyridine), derivatives or combinations thereof. The polymers containing the osmium complex above may be used in combination with such membrane polymers to form a hydrogel film.
In one embodiment, the glucose sensor may comprise a printed electrode. In such case, an electrode may be formed on an insulated substrate. Specifically, an electrode may be formed on a substrate by means of photolithography or printing techniques, such as screen printing, gravure printing, or flexography. Examples of materials constituting insulated substrates include silicon, glass, ceramics, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene, polypropyrene, and polyester. Materials exhibiting high tolerance against various solvents or chemicals may be used.
In one embodiment, the FAD-GDH electrode or the glucose sensor may comprise ionic polymer, for example, polyethyleneimine (PEI), polyacrylic acid (PA), ε-polylysine, α-polylysine or polystyrene. The molecular weight of these polymers are not limited and any type may be used.
Glucose measurement may be carried out as follows. A buffer is placed in a thermostatic cell and maintained at a certain temperature. Potassium ferricyanide or phenazine methosulfate can be used as the mediator. A working electrode comprising immobilized FAD-GDH, a counter electrode (such as a platinum electrode) and a reference electrode (such as an Ag/AgCl electrode) are prepared. A constant voltage is applied to the carbon electrode, and after the current is stable, a sample containing glucose is added followed by measurement of the increase in current. The glucose concentration in the sample can then be computed against a calibration curve prepared with glucose concentrations having known standard concentrations.
In one example, 1.5 U of FAD-GDH is immobilized on a glassy carbon (GC) electrode and the response current value with respect to glucose concentration is measured. 1.8 ml of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) and 0.2 ml of a 1 M aqueous solution of potassium hexacyanoferrate (III) (potassium ferricyanide) are added to the electrolysis cell. The GC electrode is connected to a BAS100B/W potentiostat (BAS Co., Ltd.) and the solution is stirred at 37° C. followed by applying a voltage of +500 mV to the Ag/AgCl reference electrode. In another example, the voltage applied to the Ag/AgCl reference electrode may be selected from, but not limited to, a voltage between −100 to +550, e.g., +400 mV. Glucose solutions having final concentrations of, e.g., 1 mM, 2 mM, 3 mM, 4 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM, 20 mM, 30 mM and 40 mM are added to these systems followed by measurement of the steady-state current value for each addition. These current values are plotted against known glucose concentrations (e.g., 1 mM, 2 mM, 3 mM, 4 mM 5 mM, 10 mM, 20 mM, 30 mM and 40 mM) to prepare a calibration curve. Glucose concentration can be quantified by comparing measured values against the calibration curve.
In another example, cyclic voltammetry can be carried out with the immobilized FAD-GDH described herein and conventional means. Measurements can be made by sweeping from 0 to +600 mV. Then, a certain voltage can be selected to measure the glucose concentration of a sample. This can be done by preparing a calibration curve as described above and then measuring the response current of the sample with unknown glucose concentration.
In one embodiment, the glucose sensor comprising FAD-GDH or the working electrode comprising the FAD-GDH may comprise a protective film (protective membrane).
The enzyme activity of a GOD may be determined using the same assay system as that for evaluating GDH activity, such as an assay system in which an excessive amount of mediator is present to accept the electron. Alternatively, the enzyme activity of a GOD may be determined using an assay system in which oxygen is the acceptor. Alternatively, the enzyme activity of a GOD may be determined following instructions of the manufacturer. The enzyme activity should be measured using the same system for initial activity and for residual activity in order to compute the residual activity ratio.
The following is an exemplary assay method for measuring GOD activity. Other methods may be employed as well.
GOD Assay Principle:
beta-D-Glucose+O2+H2O→D-Glucono-delta-lactone+H2O2 (catalyzed by GOD)
2H2O2+4-AA+EHSPT→Quinoneimine dye+4H2O (catalyzed by POD)
(wherein 4-AA is an abbreviation for 4-Aminoantipyrine and EHSPT is an abbreviation for N-Ethyl-N-(2-hydroxy-3-sulfopropyl)-m-toluidine)
Production of quinoneimine can be measured spectrophotometrically.
Definition of a Unit:
A GOD unit may be defined as enzyme activity capable of causing formation of one micromole of hydrogen peroxide (1⁄2 micromole of quinoneimine dye) per minute under the following conditions.
GOD Assay Method:
Reagents A-F are as follows
A. MES-Na buffer pH 5.7: 0.1M (Dissolve 2.13 g of 2-(N-morpholino) ethansulfonic acid (MW=213.25) in ca. 60 ml H2O, adjust the pH to 5.7 with 1N NaOH at 25° C., fill up to 100 ml with H2O)
B. Glucose solution: 15% (Dissolve 1.5 g of β-D-glucose and fill up to 10 ml with H2O) (should be prepared fresh)
C. 4-AA solution: 0.5% (50 mg of 4-aminoantipyrine (MW=203.25)/10 ml of H2O)
D. EHSPT solution: 40 mM (118 mg of N-Ethyl-N-(2-hydroxy-3-sulfopropyl)-m-toluidine (MW=295.3)/10 ml of H2O)
E. Peroxidase solution: 500 U (expressed in terms of purpurogalin unit)/ml in H2O
F. Enzyme diluent: 10 mM MES-Na buffer, pH 5.7, comprising 0.1% Triton X-100
Concentration in the assay mixture:
MES buffer: 79 mM
D-Glucose: 131 mM
4-AA: 0.2 mM
EHSPT: 0.3 mM
POD: ca.4 U/ml
Procedure:
Step 1. Prepare the following working solution freshly in a brownish bottle and store on ice.
30 ml Buffer solution (A)
6 ml Substrate solution (B)
0.3 ml 4-AA solution (C)
0.3 ml EHSPT solution (D)
0.3 ml POD solution (E)
Step 2. Pipette 3.0 ml of working solution into a cuvette (d=1.0 cm) and equilibrate at 37° C. for about 5 minutes.
Step 3. Add 0.1 ml of the enzyme solution* and mix gently with inversion. (* Dissolve the enzyme preparation in ice cold enzyme diluent (F) and dilute to 0.05-0.2 U/ml with the same buffer, immediately before the assay.)
Step 4. Record the increase in optical density at 555 nm against water for 2-3 min in a spectrophotometer thermostated at 37° C., and calculate the Δ OD per minute from the initial linear portion of the curve (Δ OD test).
In addition, measure the blank rate (Δ OD blank) by using the same method as the test with the proviso that enzyme diluent (F) is added instead of the enzyme solution.
GOD Activity can be calculated as follows:

ΔOD/min (ΔOD test−ΔOD blank)×Vt×df




 
  
   Volume
   ⁢
      
   activity
   ⁢
      
   
    (
    
     U
     /
     ml
    
    )
   
  
  =
  
   
    
     Δ
     ⁢
     OD
     /
     min
     ⁢
        
     
      (
      
       
        Δ
        ⁢
        OD
        ⁢
           
        test
       
       -
       
        Δ
        ⁢
        OD
        ⁢
           
        blank
       
      
      )
     
     ×
     Vt
     ×
     df
    
    
     32.8
     ×
     
      1
      /
      2
     
     ×
     1.
     ×
     Vs
    
   
   =
   
    Δ
    ⁢
    OD
    ×
    1.89
    ×
    df
   
  
 



Weight activity (U/mg)=(U/ml)×1/C
Vt: Total volume (3.1 ml)
Vs: Sample volume (0.1 ml)
32.8: Millimolar extinction coefficient of quinoneimine dye under the assay conditions (cm2/micromole)
1⁄2: Factor based on the fact that 1 mole of H2O2 produces a half of one mole of quinoneimine dye.
1.0: Light path length (cm)
df: Dilution factor
C: Enzyme concentration in dissolution (c mg/ml).
The following examples describe aspects of the present invention in detail. However, the technical scope of the present invention is not to be construed or limited in any way to the following examples. Optional features, modification and variation of the concepts herein disclosed may be resorted to by those skilled in the art, and such modifications and variations are considered within the scope of this technology.
Example 1
Unless indicated otherwise, the assessment of heat stability and storage stability of GDH and GOD were carried out according to the test method below.
Test Method
(1) Introduction of the GDH gene from a microorganism belonging to the genus Mucor and confirmation of GDH activity in the transformant
Briefly, a GDH from a microorganism belonging to the genus Mucor (MpGDH, SEQ ID NO:1) was modified by introducing mutations N66Y/N68G/C88A/Q233R/T387C/E554D/L557V/S559K thereto to obtain a gene encoding a modified GDH (which may be referred to herein as MpGDH-M1, or GDH-M1). The amino acid sequence of MpGDH-M1 is indicated in SEQ ID NO: 3, while the base sequence is indicated in SEQ ID NO: 4. A DNA construct was obtained by introducing the MpGDH-M1 gene into the multi-cloning site of plasmid pUC19. More specifically, the pUC19 linearized Vector in the In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (Clontech) was used as the pUC19 vector. The MpGDH-M1 gene was connected to the In-Fusion Cloning Site of the multi-cloning site of pUC19 by using said In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit according to the protocol in the instructions of the kit to obtain the construct plasmid (pUC19-MpGDH-M1).
The obtained recombinant plasmid pUC19-MpGDH-M1 was used as the template and PCR reaction using synthesized oligonucleotides of SEQ ID NOs: 5 to 10 and KOD-Plus-(Toyobo) was carried out with the following conditions. 5 μl of 10×KOD-Plus-buffer, 5 μl of a mixture solution comprising 2 mM of each dNTP, 2 μl of 25 mM MgSO4 solution, 50 ng of the DNA construct comprising the connected template MpGDH-M1 gene, 15 pmol of each of the synthesized oligonucleotides above, and 1 Unit of KOD-Plus- were added and the total volume was adjusted to 50 μl with sterile water. The prepared reaction solution was applied to a thermal cycler (Eppendorf) and incubated at 94° C. for 2 min, and then the cycle “94° C. for 15 seconds”-“50° C. for 30 seconds”-“68° C. for 8 minutes” was repeated 30 times. A portion of the reaction solution was applied to 1.0% agarose gel and electrophoresis was carried out and it was confirmed that the DNA fragment of about 8,000 bp was specifically amplified. The obtained DNA was digested with the restriction enzyme DpnI (NEW ENGLAND BIOLABS) and after cleaving the remaining template DNA, E. coli. strain JM 109 was transformed and spread out on LB-amp agar medium. Colonies which grew were inoculated to 2.5 mL of LB-amp medium (containing 1% (W/V) bactotryptone, 0.5% (W/V) peptone, 0.5% (W/V) NaCl, 50 μg/ml Ampicillin) and shake cultured at 37° C. for 20 hours to obtain the culture. Bacterial cells were obtained by carrying out centrifugation 7,000 rpm for 5 minutes to collect the cells. Then the bacterial cells were applied to recombinant plasmid extraction using QIAGEN tip-100 (QIAGEN) to extract and purify the recombinant plasmid and 2.5 μg DNA was obtained. The DNA base sequence encoding MpGDH-M1 in said plasmid was determined using the multi-capillary DNA analysis system Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies) and, as a result, a DNA construct (SEQ ID NO:11) encoding the mutant MpGDH-M1/A175C/N214C/G466D (SEQ ID NO:12) was obtained (also referred to herein as MpGDH-M2, or GDH-M2). This gene was expressed in Aspergillus sojae and the GDH activity thereof was confirmed.
More specifically, a GDH gene from a microorganism belonging to the genus Mucor was used as the starting material and a modified GDH gene was designed to obtain a GDH suitable for recombinant expression in Aspergillus sojae. More specifically, based on the GDH gene sequence of SEQ ID NO:1, a codon optimized gene sequence with codon frequency adapted for expression in the host was designed and the entire gene was synthesized. This wholly synthesized DNA sequence is indicated in SEQ ID NO:2.
Double-joint PCR (Fungal Genetics and Biology, 2004, volume no. 41, pp. 973-981) was carried out to construct a cassette consisting of 5′ arm region—PyrG gene (uracil auxotrophy marker)—TEF1 promotor gene—flavin binding GDH gene-3′ arm region. This cassette was to transform of a pyrG deficient strain from Aspergillus sojae strain NBRC4239 (a strain in which 48 base pairs upstream, the 896 bp coding region and downstream 240 base pairs of the pyrG gene is deleted) as follows. Conidia of the pyrG-disrupted strain from Aspergillus sojae NBRC 4239 was inoculated to 100 ml of polypeptone dextrin liquid medium comprising 20 mM uridine in a 500 ml Erlenmeyer flask and after shaking the culture at 30° C. for about 20 hours, the cells were recovered. Protoplasts were prepared from the recovered cells. Transformation was carried out by using the protoplast PEG method with the obtained protoplasts and 20 μg of the target gene-inserted DNA construct. Subsequently, the cells were incubated at 30° C. for 5 days or more with Czapek-Dox minimal medium (Difco Co., pH 6) containing 0.5% (w/v) agar and 1.2 M sorbitol to obtain transformed Aspergillus sojae having the capability to form colonies.
In the resulting transformed Aspergillus sojae, pyrG, which is a gene capable of complementing uridine auxotrophy, is introduced and, therefore, the transformants can grow on uridine-free medium and can be selected as those strains in which the gene of interest was introduced. From the obtained strains, the desired transformants were selected by confirmation with PCR. Aspergillus sojae transformed with the MpGDH-M2 gene was used and GDH was produced.
Conidia of each strain were inoculated to 40 mL of DPY liquid medium (1% (w/v) polypeptone, 2% (w/v) dextrin, 0.5% (w/v) yeast extract, 0.5% (w/v) KH2PO4, 0.05% (w/v) MgSO4.7H2O; pH not adjusted) in a 200 ml Erlenmeyer flask and shaking culture was performed at 30° C. for 4 days at 160 rpm. Next, the cells were filtered from the culture after cultivation, and the supernatant fraction of the resulting medium was concentrated to 10 mL with Amicon Ultra-15, 30 K NMWL (Millipore). Then, this was applied to a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200 pg (GE Healthcare) column equilibrated with 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) containing 150 mM NaCl and eluted with the same buffer. Fractions exhibiting GDH activity were collected to obtain the purified product of MpGDH-M2.
(2) Heat stability evaluation of GDH and GOD
A GOD from Aspergillus niger was purchase from Sigma-Aldrich (Type X-S, referred to herein as GOD-1). Another GOD from Aspergillus sp. was purchase from Toyobo (Catalog No. GLO-201, referred to herein as GOD-2). A GOD from Aspergillus niger was purchase from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd (Catalog No. 074-02401, referred to herein as GOD-3). Another GOD from Aspergillus niger was purchase from Sigma-Aldrich (Type VII, referred to herein as GOD-4). The GDH designated as GLD3 was purchased from Funakoshi (the amino terminus of this enzyme was found to be identical to that of the GDH from Mucor hiemalis and it is highly plausible that this enzyme is from Mucor hiemalis, a microorganism belonging to the genus Mucor) (GLD3 may also be referred to herein as GDH-GLD3). When using GLD3, ultrafiltration was carried out using Amicon ultra 0.5 ml filter (Merck, cutoff 30 kDa) to remove low molecular weight constituents, and the solution was replaced with PBS (pH 7.4). MpGDH-M2 was prepared as above. The enzyme is diluted to retrieve a diluted enzyme solution of about 1 U/ml (100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0). A pair of such enzyme solutions each having 0.1 mL are prepared and one is preserved at 4° C. while the other is subjected to heat treatment for 15 minutes at 57° C., pH 7.
After heat treatment, the activity of each enzyme is determined and the “residual activity ration (%)” is computed as the percentage of residual activity after heat treatment for 15 minutes at 57° C., pH 7(%) compared to the enzyme activity of the enzyme preserved at 4° C. (100%). Results are shown in FIG. 1. GODs exhibited superior heat stability and were stable under harsh temperature conditions compared to GDHs.
(3) Storage Stability Evaluation of GDH and GOD
The solutions of 1 mg/ml of each GDH and GOD were replaced with PBS solution and stored at 40° C. for a prolonged period of time. After a day, 4 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 3 weeks, the GDH activity or GOD activity of each enzyme was measured. The “remaining activity rate (%)” was computed as the activity value after storage at 40° C. by setting the activity value before storage at 40° C. as 100%. Results are shown in FIGS. 2 to 4.
As a result, after 1 week, the residual activity ratio of GOD-3 was 22%, GOD-4 was 22%, GOD-2 was 30%, and GOD-1 was 41%. That is, after 1 week at 40° C., all GODs exhibited a significant decrease in activity. Further, after 2 weeks, the residual activity ratio of GOD-3 was 9%, GOD-4 was 8%, GOD-2 was 13%, and GOD-1 was 30% and again all GODs exhibited a significant decrease in activity.
On the other hand, after one week, the residual activity ratio of MpGDH-M2 was 80%, and that of GLD3 was 88%. That is, GDHs retained their activity over a prolonged period of time. After 2 weeks, the residual activity ratio of MpGDH-M2 after was 72%, and that of GLD3 was 83% and again the GDHs retained their activity over a prolonged period of time. Even after 3 weeks, MpGDH-M2 retained about 73% of its initial activity, whereas GOD-2 lost most of its activity over the same period of time (4%). See FIG. 2.
When comparing the residual activity after treatment at 57° C., pH 7 for 15 minutes, each GOD had both higher residual activity and higher stability than MpGDH-M2 and GLD3. However, it was found that, surprisingly, the stability of GODs were lower in the 40° C. storage test compared to said GDHs, and it was found that GODs, despite their superior heat stability under harsh temperature conditions, may not be optimal for use in CGM. Rather, GDHs proved to be suited for long term use such as in CGM.
Since the GDHs retained relatively high activity even in the 40° C. storage test, it is highly plausible that said GDHs will also retain relatively high activity when stored at 37° C.
Example 2
Storage stability test of GDH/GOD immobilized electrodes
GDH/GOD immobilized electrodes were produced and tested for storage stability as follows.
Method of Producing the Electrode
3 μl of 5% polyethyleneimine (PEI) (catalogue no. 164-17821, average molecular weight 10000, from Wako), which is a cationic polymer, is added onto a screen printed electrode based on carbon and then dried. Next, 0.5 μl of osmium polymer (catalogue no. 002096, BAS) treated at 98° C. for 1 hour is added and then dried. Next, 3 μl of 35 mg/ml GDH/GOD is added and then dried. Next, 3 μl of 2% polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether (PEGDE, average molecular weight 500, manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich) is added and stored at 4° C. overnight.

    
    
        Electrodes were also produced using 1% polyacrylic acid (PA) (catalogue no. 416037-100 ML, average molecular weight 15000, from Sigma-Aldrich), which is an anionic polymer, instead of PEI.
    
    


Storage Stability Test
The electrodes produced as above were washed with ultrapure water and dried at 30° C. for 1 hour. Next, for every 2 hours, the electrodes were taken and subjected to electrochemical measurement. After the electrochemical measurement, the electrode was again stored in an incubator at 30° C. in a dry state.
Electrochemical Measurement
The reference electrode Ag/AgCl, the counter electrode (platinum) and the screen printed electrode based on GDH or GOD as the working electrode were placed in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7). Then, cyclic voltammetry measurement sweeping from 0 to +600 mV was carried out.
The oxidation current values at +500 mV for a condition where no glucose was added and a condition where 5 mM glucose was added were compared and the difference was taken as the response current value. Measurements were carried out at 0, 2 and 4 hrs, and the relative value was recorded taking the response current value at 0 hr as 100%.
Results
For the electrodes produced by using PEI, the response current of the GDH-M2 electrode was 67.3% after for 2 hours. By comparison, GOD-3 lost much activity and the residual response current of the GOD-3 electrode was a mere 30.8% at 2 hours. Similar results were observed after 4 hours of storage and the relative response current value of GOD-3 was lower than that of GDH-M2. See FIG. 5.
For the electrodes produced by using PA, no response current could be observed with the GOD-3 immobilized electrode even at 0 hours. By contrast, the response current could be observed for the GDH-M2 immobilized electrode using PA. After 2 hours of storage, 68.3% of activity was retained, and after 4 hours, 47.1% of initial activity was retrained, showing stability superior to the electrode immobilized by using PEI. See FIG. 6.
It should be noted that the electrodes evaluated in this experiment have no protective film and thus the conditions are more harsh and severe than conditions in actual CGM. Sensors with glucose dehydrogenases which exhibit higher storage stability than sensors with glucose oxidases, which are used in current CGM devices, can be used advantageously for measurements over long periods.
Example 3
Optimal pH
The optimal pH of the glucose dehydrogenases GDH-M2 and GLD3 were evaluated.
Activity assay was carried out as follows. The 2,6-dichloro-indophenol (DCIP) assay was performed by measuring the time-dependent reduction of DCIP at 520 nm (300 mM DCIP/1 mM PMS/400 mM Glucose). Citrate-sodium buffer was used for pH 5.5 to 6.0 while phosphate-potassium buffer was used for pH 6 to 8. See FIG. 7 (GDH-M2) and FIG. 8 (GLD3).
By way of comparison, the optimal pH of GOD-3 is reported to be pH 5.6 according to the manufactures' catalogue.
Example 4
Glucose Concentration Dependency
The glucose concentration dependency of the electrodes with immobilized enzymes was evaluated as follows.
The sensors was prepared using PEI, GDH-M2, an Os polymer, and PEGDE as in Example 2 above. Next, the electrode was placed in 10 ml of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer solution (pH 7) together with an Ag/AgCl reference electrode and Platinum counter electrode (auxiliary electrode) to compose a three-electrode system. The measurements were carried out with this three-electrode system.
While stirring at 350 rpm, a predetermined concentration of glucose was added. Then, cyclic voltammetry measurement sweeping from 0 to +600 mV was carried out and the oxidation current value at +400 mV was recorded. Results are shown in FIGS. 9 and 10.
It was demonstrated that glucose concentration dependency of the response current could be confirmed from 1 to 30.1 mM glucose.
Example 5
Molecular Weight
The molecular weights of the enzymes were evaluated with SDS-PAGE as follows. EndoH endoglycosidase (New England Biolabs) treatment was carried out at 37° C. for 24 hours. Then SDS-PAGE was carried out with a 5-20% gradient gel. The molecular weight of M2 was about 70 kDa and that of GLD3 was about 65 to 80 kDa. See FIG. 11.
Example 6
Substrate Specificity
The substrate specificity of GDH-M2 was evaluated as follows. More specifically, the concentration of the substrate sugar was 200 mM. Activity on glucose was set as 100% and relative activity on other substrates is expressed in terms of percentage.










TABLE 1







GDH-M2
GLD3




















Glucose
 100%
 100%



Maltose
0.37%
0.67%



Xylose
0.55%
1.60%







*Values of GLD3 are those according to the catalog provided by the manufacturer.






Each patent, patent application, publication and document referenced herein hereby is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Citation or reference of the above patents, patent applications, publications and documents is not an admission that any of the foregoing is pertinent prior art, nor does it constitute any admission as to the contents or date of these publications or documents. Descriptions and definitions set forth in the present specification prevail over those in documents incorporated herein by reference. The technology illustratively described herein may suitably be practiced in absence of any element(s) not specifically disclosed herein. Terms and expressions which have been employed are used as terms of description and not of limitation. Use of such terms and expressions do not exclude any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, and various modifications are possible within the scope of the technology claimed. The term “a” or “an” can refer to one of or a plurality of the elements it modifies (e.g., “a reagent” can mean one or more reagents) unless the context clearly indicates either one of the elements or more than one of the elements is described. In each instance herein any of the terms “comprising,” “consisting essentially of,” and “consisting of” may be replaced with of the other two terms.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
In some embodiments, the present methods can be used, e.g., for continuous glucose monitoring.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEQUENCES
SEQ ID NO: 1 Mucor prainii wt GDH aa
SEQ ID NO: 2 Mucor prainii wt GDH DNA
SEQ ID NO: 3 MpGDH-M1 aa
SEQ ID NO: 4 MpGDH-M1 DNA
SEQ ID NOs: 5-10 Primers
SEQ ID NO: 11 MpGDH-M2 aa
SEQ ID NO: 12 MpGDH-M2 DNA
SEQ ID NO: 13 MhGDH aa
SEQ ID NO: 14 MhGDH DNA

## Claims

1. A method of continuous glucose monitoring comprising using a glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) capable of
(a) retaining 60% or more of the initial activity over a period of 1 week when retained at 40° C. in solution when retained at a pH of 7.4,
(b) retaining 40% or more of the initial activity over a period of 2 weeks when retained at 40° C. in solution when retained at a pH of 7.4, or
(c) retaining 30% or more of the initial activity over a period of 3 weeks when retained at 40° C. in solution when retained at a pH of 7.4,
wherein said GDH is a flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) dependent GDH and wherein said GDH is neither a membrane bound protein nor GLD3,
wherein the continuous glucose monitoring comprises
i) bringing a sample containing glucose into contact with a glucose sensor, wherein the glucose sensor comprises an electrode, the GDH and a mediator, wherein the GDH is immobilized on the electrode and wherein the mediator is immobilized on the electrode,
ii) applying a potential to the electrode, and
iii) measuring the response current,
wherein the continuous glucose monitoring is carried out for 1 day or more.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein continuous glucose monitoring can be carried out without re-calibration.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the GDH has the following characteristics:
(1) stability as defined in any one of (a) to (c) of claim 1,
(2) substrate specificity: the reactivity to maltose is 2% or less, relative to the reactivity to D-glucose (100%);
(3) optimal activity pH: 6.5 to 7.5; and
(4) a molecular weight of about 65 to about 81 kDa when measured by sodium dodecyl sulfonate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the continuous glucose monitoring is carried out over a period of 1 to 3 weeks.