alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 2023 Global Mental Health Conference: Research Without Borders

### ** Date      

### ** Location

## Overview

The 12th Global Mental Health Research Without Borders Conference brought together researchers, innovators, and other scholars from around the globe to highlight findings from cutting-edge science and explore new opportunities for groundbreaking research. The 2023 conference was held in person. However, selected events were live-streamed or recorded **.

**Conference Objectives**

- To provide a premier interdisciplinary space for researchers, practitioners, policymakers, funders, and those with lived experience to meet and share innovative developments in the field of global mental health
- To discuss innovations in the study of social determinants and outcomes of global mental health
- To identify engagement approaches to increase the value, quality, and impact of global mental health research for people with lived experience of mental health challenges, researchers, and end-users
- To raise awareness and educate key audiences on the importance of global mental health research, which might allow for greater reach, empowerment, accountability, and mobilization toward sustainable development goals
- To cultivate the next generation of global mental health researchers with a particular emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion (country-led)
- To foster networking and sustainable partnerships among participants and conveners

**Workshops**

- Writing a Successful Global Mental Health Research Training Grant for the National Institutes of Health on  November 1, 2023  (Organized by NIMH)
- Advancing the Cultural Transferability of Common Measures in Mental Health Sciences on  October 31, 2023  (Organized by the International Alliance of Mental Health Research Funders).  This workshop was recorded.
- Connecting Climate Minds: Catalyzing a Global Research Community for Climate Change and Mental Health on  November 1, 2023  (Organized by Wellcome)
- Crafting Effective Resumes and Using Professional Social Media for Networking to Unlock Your Career Potential on  November 1, 2023  (Organized by NIMH and STEM Career Services)

**Research Tracks**

- Precision psychiatry/stratification in mental health research
- Climate change and mental health
- Youth mental health and wellbeing
- Data science, data sharing, common data elements
- Health communications
- Decolonization of global mental health
- Suicide prevention
- Innovations in implementation science

## Sponsored by

- National Institute of Mental Health
- Grand Challenges Canada  **
- Wellcome  **
- International Alliance of Mental Health Research Funders  **
#### Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Respondent, v Demetres Spanos et al., Defendants, and Isadora Sidroula Spanos, Appellant.

Submitted August 12, 2013;

decided September 17, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
NUMBER 13-16-00221-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL. MARK SKURKA

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition

and Motion for Emergency Stay.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Order Per Curiam

Relator, the State of Texas ex rel. Mark Skurka, has filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus and prohibition with this Court on April 15, 2016, contending that the 

Honorable Missy Medary, presiding judge of the 347th Judicial District Court of Nueces

County, Texas, abused her discretion, leaving relator without an adequate remedy by 

appeal, by ordering the State to disclose, before 5:00 p.m. on April 15, 2016, which jail 

telephone recordings of the defendant it will present as evidence at trial in trial court cause 

number 15-CR-3503-H. Relator has also filed a motion for emergency stay in which it 
2

asks this Court to stay the underlying proceedings until such time as we may fully consider 

the petition for writ of mandamus.

Having reviewed relator’s petition and motion, we hereby GRANT the motion for 

emergency stay and ORDER all proceedings in trial court cause number 15-CR-3503-H

STAYED until further order of this Court.

We further ORDER the real party in interest, Antonio Aguilera, to file any response 

to the petition for writ of mandamus with this Court on or before 5:00 p.m. on Friday, April 

22, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

Order delivered and filed the

15th day of April, 2016.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




/s/ James G. JacksonJames G. JacksonChief Financial Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLCDated:May 10, 2011
#### In the Matter of James Fisher, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[963 NYS2d 606]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

During a search of petitioner’s cube, which he did not share with other inmates, a correction officer found a homemade shank taped to the underside of petitioner’s bed. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing a weapon. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charge and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report and related documentation, together with the testimony of the correction officer who authorized the search, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Alache v Fischer,*91 AD3d 1240, 1241 [2012]; *Matter of Hamilton v Fischer,*84 AD3d 1614 [2011]). A reasonable inference of possession arises by virtue of the fact that the weapon was found in an area within petitioner’s control even though he did not have exclusive access to his cube *(see Matter of Rogers v Bezio,*67 AD3d 1100, 1101 [2009]; *Matter of Griffin v Selsky,*60 AD3d 1247, 1248 [2009]). While petitioner denied that the weapon was his and maintained that it had been planted in his cube, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Rogers v Bezio,*67 AD3d at 1101; *Matter of Muller v Fischer,*62 AD3d 1191, 1191 [2009]). In addition, we find no merit to petitioner’s claim that the Hearing Officer failed to independently verify the credibility of the information contained in the anonymous notes leading to the search given that the determination of guilt was not based upon the contents of the notes, but rather upon the results of the search *(see Matter of Horne v Fischer,*98 AD3d 788, 789 [2012]; *Matter of Nimmons v Fischer,*68 AD3d 1311 [2009]). Furthermore, upon reviewing the record, we find nothing to indicate that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias *Csee Matter of Jackson v Fischer,*98 AD3d 766, 767-768 [2012]; *Matter of Sweet v Poole,*48 AD3d 867, 868 [2008]). We have considered petitioner’s many remaining claims and find them either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.

*1287Peters, PJ., Rose, Spain and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Exhibit
      32.1








KMA
      GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.


FORM
      10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 2006


CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report (the “report”) of KMA Global Solutions
      International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April
      30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Jeffrey D.
      Reid,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
      § 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1)  The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Jeffrey D. Reid


Jeffrey
      D. Reid


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer








Date:
      July 28, 2006
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 269 

Expressing support for the designation of March 2, 2020, as ‘‘Gold Star 

Families Remembrance Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 28, 2019 

Mr. LATTA (for himself, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Ms. STEFANIK, 

Mrs. BUSTOS, Mr. GALLAGHER, Mr. GREEN of Tennessee, Mr. HUDSON, 

Mr. COX of California, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, 

Mr. TURNER, Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana, Mr. CISNEROS, Mrs. AXNE, Mr. 

WILSON of South Carolina, and Mr. BYRNE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in 

addition to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of March 2, 2020, 

as ‘‘Gold Star Families Remembrance Day’’. 

Whereas March 2, 2020, marks the 91st anniversary of 

President Calvin Coolidge signing an Act of Congress 

that approved and funded the first Gold Star pilgrimage 

to enable Gold Star families to travel to the gravesites of 

their loved ones who died during World War I; 

Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces of 

the United States bear the burden of protecting the freedom of the people of the United States; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 269 IH 

Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members 

and veterans of the Armed Forces of the United States 

should never be forgotten: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Gold Star 

3 Families Remembrance Day’’; 

4 (2) honors and recognizes the sacrifices made 

5 by the families of members and veterans of the 

6 Armed Forces of the United States who gave their 

7 lives to defend freedom and protect America; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to observe ‘‘Gold Star Families Remembrance Day’’ 

10 by— 

11 (A) performing acts of service and good 

12 will in their communities; and 

13 (B) celebrating the lives of those who have 

14 made the ultimate sacrifice so that others could 

15 continue to enjoy life, liberty, and the pursuit 

16 of happiness. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[Cite as State v. McKay, 124 Ohio St.3d 442, 2010-Ohio-718.] 

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MCKAY, APPELLANT. 

[Cite as State v. McKay, 124 Ohio St.3d 442, 2010-Ohio-718.] 

Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Singleton. 

(No. 2007-1023 — Submitted January 13, 2010 — Decided March 4, 2010.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ashtabula County, No. 2006-A-0066, 

2007-Ohio-1923. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of 

State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958, to the 

extent that the court of appeals held that R.C. 2929.191 could be applied in this 

case. R.C. 2929.191 may not be applied to a sentence entered prior to July 11, 

2006. 

 MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ., 

concur. 

 LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in 

the dissenting opinion of LANZINGER, J., in State v. Singleton. 

__________________ 

Thomas L. Sartini, Ashtabula County Prosecuting Attorney, and Shelley 

M. Pratt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 

Ashtabula County Public Defender Office, Inc., and Marie Lane, for 

appellant. 

______________________
#### In the Matter of Sanayi Beckles, Appellant, v Rafael E. Cestero, Respondent.

Submitted July 1, 2013;

decided September 3, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.

Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certifications of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HoustonWire & Cable Company (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), Charles A. Sorrentino, as Chief Executive Officer of theCorporation, and Nicol G. Graham, as Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| /s/ Charles A. Sorrentino |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Charles A. Sorrentino     |
| Chief Executive Officer   |
| August 14, 2006           |
|                      |
| /s/ Nicol G. Graham       |   |
| Nicol G. Graham           |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| August 14, 2006           |

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Houston Wire & Cable Company forpurposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

----
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

677 

CA 15-00059 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

IRONWOOD, L.L.C., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

ET AL., PLAINTIFF, 

V ORDER

JGB PROPERTIES, LLC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

SCHLATHER, STUMBAR, PARKS & SALK, LLP, ITHACA (RAYMOND M. SCHLATHER OF

COUNSEL), AND CAMARDO LAW FIRM, P.C., AUBURN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JANET D. CALLAHAN OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Brian

F. DeJoseph, J.), entered March 24, 2014. The order, among other

things, awarded plaintiff Ironwood, L.L.C., punitive damages in the

amount of $300,000. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988;

Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see

also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). 

Entered: July 10, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
[987 NE2d 631, 965 NYS2d 71]

#### Keith Orsi, an Infant, by His Parents and Natural Guardians, Lisa Orsi and Another, et al., Appellants, v Susan Haralabatos, M.D., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Argued February 13, 2013;

decided March 26, 2013

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, P.C.,*Garden City *(Dana E. Heitz*and *Joseph P. Awad*of counsel), for appellants.

*Phillips Lytle LLP,*New York City *(Eric M. Kraus*and *Craig R. Bucki*of counsel), for respondents.

*1080OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and so much of the motion of defendants Haralabatos and Stony Brook Orthopaedic Associates as seeks summary judgment dismissing the medical malpractice cause of action against them should be denied.

We agree with the Appellate Division that there are issues of fact as to whether Haralabatos and Stony Brook departed from the applicable standard of care. The Appellate Division erred, however, in granting summary judgment on the issue of proximate cause. Although the issue was preserved for review by being mentioned in an affirmation of counsel, it was not addressed in the experts’ affidavits that Haralabatos and Stony Brook submitted in support of their summary judgment motion. These defendants thus failed to meet their initial burden of showing that any departure from the standard of care was not the proximate cause of plaintiff Keith Orsi’s osteomyelitis.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and so much of the motion of defendants Haralabatos and Stony Brook Orthopaedic Associates as seeks summary judgment dismissing the medical malpractice cause of action against them denied, in a memorandum.
96-2153.

#### Internatl. Thomson Publishing, Inc. v. Tracy.

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 94-T-1078 and 94-T-1079. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for continuance of oral argument currently scheduled for April 22,1997,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for continuance of oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and oral argument is scheduled for April 23,1997.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 26 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 26

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 8, 2019.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Rules: Ms. Matsui and Mr. Perlmutter.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of VelaTel Global Communications, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George Alvarez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: August 15, 2011
By: /s/ George AlvarezGeorge Alvarez, Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fearless International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Carol Stephan, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: | February15,2008
|----- | ---------------
|      |                
|      | By:            
|      | Name:          
|      | Title:         

---
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


         The  Company  has  the  following  subsidiaries  including  significant
subsidiaries as defined in Regulation S-X, each incorporated in the jurisdiction
stated  opposite its name. All of the following  subsidiaries  are 100% owned by
the Company.  The Company has additional  subsidiaries,  which, if considered in
the  aggregate  as a single  subsidiary,  would not  constitute  a  "significant
subsidiary" as such term is defined in Regulation S-X.

Name of Subsidiary                                           Jurisdiction of 
                                                              Incorporation

Bandag A.G. ....................................................Switzerland
Bandag Canada Ltd. ..................................................Canada
Bandag Europe N.V. .................................................Belgium
Bandag Licensing Corporation.  ........................................Iowa
Bandag Incorporated of S.A. (Proprietary) Limited .............South Africa
Bandag New Zealand Limited .....................................New Zealand
Bandag do Brasil Ltda ...............................................Brazil
Bandag B.V. ....................................................Netherlands
Bandag de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. ......................................Mexico
BTC, Inc. .........................................................Delaware
Tire Distribution Systems, Inc. ...................................Delaware
Tire Management Solutions, Inc. .......................................Iowa