alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-64,190] 

                    By application dated January 1, 2009, the Department of Labor (Department) received a request for administrative reconsideration of the Department's Notice of negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on November 26, 2008. The Department's Notice of determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 10, 2008 (73 FR 75138). The subject workers are engaged in textile distribution services for goods produced in Canada.                 

The negative determination was based on the Department's findings that the petitioning workers do not support a firm or appropriate subdivision that produces an article domestically. 

In the request for reconsideration, a worker alleged that the subject workers' work was related to the textile manufactured in affiliated facilities in North Carolina, Virginia, New York, and related to the textile dyed and finished at an affiliated facility in Pennsylvania. 

The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974. 

## Conclusion 

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of January 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer,  Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-1490 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### In re: MEDI-CAL REIMBURSEMENT RATE REDUCTION LITIGATION.

MDL No. 2069.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

Aug. 19, 2009.

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman, ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN, W. ROYAL FURGESON, JR. and FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., Judges of the Panel.

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel: Plaintiffs in the Northern District of California action have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of this litigation in the Central District of California. Plaintiffs in one Central District of California action support the motion. Plaintiffs in three Central District of California actions oppose centralization or, alternatively, suggest a stay in the Northern District of California action. Defendant David Maxwell-Jolly opposes centralization.

This litigation currently consists of six actions listed on Schedule A and pending in two districts, five actions in the Central District of California and one action in the Northern District of California.

On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we find that the benefits of Section 1407 centralization are not significant enough to justify transfer of these cases. The actions here are pending in two districts within the same state and, by and large, raise strictly legal issues. One of the Panel’s prime considerations is often the need to avoid inconsistent rulings on similar issues. Usually, that consideration is bolstered by the concern for duplicative and burdensome discovery leading up to the legal issues. Here, very little discovery appears necessary prior to the joinder of the legal issues. Merely to avoid two federal courts having to decide the same issue is, by itself, usually not sufficient to justify Section 1407 centralization.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for centralization of these six actions is denied.

SCHEDULE A

MDL No. 2069 — IN RE: MEDI-CAL REIMBURSEMENT RATE REDUCTION LITIGATION

> *Central District of California*

> *Independent Living Center of Southern California, et al. v. Sandra Shewry, et al,*C.A. No. 2:08-3315

> *California Association for Health Services at Home v. Sandra Shewry,*C.A. No. 2:08-7045

> *California Medical Transportation*As*sociation, Inc. v. Sandra Shewry,*C.A. No. 2:08-7046

> *Managed Pharmacy Care, et al. v. David Maxwell-Jolly,*C.A. No. 2:09-382 *California Pharmacists Association, et al. v. David Maxwell-Jolly,*C.A. No. 2:09-722

> *1379
>       *Northern District of California*

> *Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, et at. v. Sandra Shewry,*C.A. No. 3:08-5173
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment to
Registration Statement No. 33-13901, and in Registration Statement Nos.
33-73696, 33-73698, 33-73700, 333-17349 and 333-17351 of Barr Laboratories, Inc.
on Form S-8 of our reports dated August 6, 1999, appearing in and incorporated
by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Barr Laboratories, Inc. for
the year ended June 30, 1999.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
August 25, 1999




                                                                              56
EXHIBIT 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kingston Systems Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George J. Coupe,
Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                              KINGSTON SYSTEMS INC.

                                   By: /s/ George J. Coupe
                                       -------------------------------
                                       George J. Coupe
                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                       January 26, 2007
EXHIBIT 31.1
                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gaye Adams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10 QSB of Online  Originals,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
small business issuer and I have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material information relating to the small business issuer,  including
          its  consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within
          those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's  disclosure
          controls  and  procedures  as of a date  within  90 days  prior to the
          filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
          the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business
issuer's  auditors and the audit  committee of small business  issuer's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the small  business  issuer's
          ability to record,  process,  summarize and report  financial data and
          have identified for the small business  issuer's auditors any material
          weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's
          internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes
in  internal  controls  or in other  factors  that  could  significantly  affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.

Date:    April 16, 2007


By:       /s/ Gaye Adams
         --------------------------------
         Gaye Adams
         President and CEO
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





The undersigned hereby certifies that
he is the duly appointed and acting Chief Executive Officer of Neoprobe
Corporation (the Company) and hereby further certifies as follows:





(1)       The
periodic report containing financial statements to which this certificate is an
exhibitfully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
information contained in the periodic report to which this certificate is an
exhibitfairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





In witness whereof, the undersigned has
executed and delivered this certificate as of the date set forth opposite his
signature below.





March
      31, 2010
            /s/ David C. BuppDavid
      C. BuppPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23B 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Board of Directors 

Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 

Bassett, Virginia 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 33-52405, 33-52407, 333-60327 and 333-43188) on Form S-8 of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and subsidiaries of our report datedDecember 20, 2006, relating to the balance sheets of International Home Furnishings Center, Inc. as of October 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related statements of income, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of thethree years in the period ended October 31, 2006, which report is included in the annual report on Form 10-K of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and subsidiaries. 

/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC 

High Point, NorthCarolina 

February 7, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Williams, Also Known as DeAndre Williams, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 902]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 16, 1991 *(People v Williams,*178 AD2d 570 [1991]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered October 17, 1989.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Ritter, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
The State of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 14, 2015

No. 04-15-00181-CR

Genevieve Marie PANTOJA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR4434

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Time is 

extended to August 12, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 7TH DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 11th

day of February, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JOSEPH EDWARD SULLIVAN, Appellant

NO. 12-13-00253-CR; Trial Court No. 007-1018-12

Opinion by Brian Hoyle, Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, 

and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the 

judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the 

court below be in all things affirmed, for which execution may issue, and that this decision be 

certified to the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 15th day of July, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3525 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3525

To repeal the Jones Act restrictions on coastwise trade, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 23, 2010

 Mr. McCain (for himself and Mr. Risch) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the Jones Act restrictions on coastwise trade, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Open America's Waters Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF JONES ACT LIMITATIONS ON COASTWISE TRADE.

    (a) In General.--Section 12112(a) of title 46, United States Code, 
is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) In General.--A coastwise endorsement may be issued for a 
vessel that qualifies under the laws of the United States to engage in 
the coastwise trade.''.
    (b) Regulations.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Commandant of the United States Coast Guard 
shall issue regulations to implement the amendment made by subsection 
(a). Such regulations shall require that a vessel permitted to engaged 
in the coastwise trade meets all appropriate safety and security 
requirements.
    (c) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Tank vessel construction standards.--Section 
        3703a(c)(1)(C) of title 46, United States Code, is amended by 
        striking ``Coast Guard and is qualified for documentation as a 
        wrecked vessel under section 12112 of this title.'' and 
        inserting ``Coast Guard.''.
            (2) Liquified gas tankers.--Section 12120 of title 46, 
        United States Code, is amended by striking ``United States,'' 
        and all that follows and inserting ``United States.''.
            (3) Small passenger vessels.--Section 12121(b) of title 46, 
        United States Code, is amended by striking ``12112,''.
            (4) Loss of coastwise trade privileges.--Section 12132 of 
        title 46, United States Code, is repealed.
            (5) Table of sections.--The table of sections for chapter 
        121 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking the 
        item relating to section 12132.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Black Hills Power, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark T. Thies,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Mark T. Thies
Mark T. Thies
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
March 25, 2004
#### In the Matter of Michael S. Pascazi, Appellant, v Colleen C. Gardner, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Decided September 10, 2013

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
# Social Media at NIMH

## Connect With Us

The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) uses social media to share the latest research findings, funding and training opportunities, events, and information and resources on mental illnesses. Follow, share, and be a part of the conversation on X ** (formerly known as Twitter), Facebook **, YouTube **, LinkedIn ** and Instagram **. Use our social media shareables to educate your community about mental health.

## **** Facebook

> Facebook **

## **** Instagram

Powered by Curator.io**

## **** YouTube

#### Featured Videos

75 Years and 75 Seconds **
The National Institute of Mental Health was established in response to America's post-World War II need to address mental health. Today, the institute leads federal research on mental disorders, aiming to prevent and cure mental illnesses through basic and clinical research.
The People Behind NIMH **
At NIMH, our employees are the driving force that brings our mission to life. From supporting and training the next generation of scientists to exploring the mysteries of the brain, these passionate individuals are working to make people's lives better.
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Scout Acquisition, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher Kelly, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Christopher KellyChristopher
      KellyPrincipal
      Financial OfficerAugust
      11, 2010
#### Parviz Noghrey, Respondent-Appellant, v Town of Brookhaven et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Submitted November 26, 2012;

decided February 7, 2013

Motion for reargument denied *[see*19 NY3d 1023 (2012)].