alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             252
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      325
<ALLOWANCES>                                        19
<INVENTORY>                                        894
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    12
<PP&E>                                            6454
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              911
<BONDS>                                            452
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         14
<COMMON>                                           115
<OTHER-SE>                                        1086
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4803
<SALES>                                           4631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4631
<CGS>                                             4053
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  48
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    336
<INCOME-TAX>                                        55
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                281
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       239
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.03
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Summit Exploration Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Alan Hart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of July, 2007.

BY:
/s/ ALAN HART                        Alan  Hart, Principal Executive Officer **
DENY;andOpinionFiledJune20,2014.InTheQtnurtofAppealsJFiftljDistrictofexasatIaltasNo.05-14-00757-CVINREJAYSANDONCOOPER,RelatorOriginalProceedingfromtheCountyCourtatLawNo.2GraysonCounty,TexasTrialCourtCauseNo.2011-2-1391MEMORANDUMOPINIONBeforeJusticesO’Neill,Lang,andBrownOpinionbyJusticeBrownRelatorfiledthispetitionforwritofmandamusrequestingthattheCourtorderthecountyclerkofGraysonCountytoprovidehimwithafreecopyoftheclerk’srecordinadditiontothecopythattheclerkhasfiledinrelator’spendingappealsothatrelatorcanusetheadditionalcopytopreparehisproseappealofhiscriminalconviction.Relatorwasadjudgedindigentinthetrialcourt.Theclerk’srecordwastiledinhisappealwithoutcosttorelatoronMay7,2014.AlthoughtheCourtordinarilydoesnothavejurisdictiontoissueawritofmandamustoacourtclerk,Texascourtsofappealsmay,inappropriatecases,issuewritsofmandamusnecessarytoenforcethejurisdictionofthecourt.TEx.GOVTCODEANN.§22.221(West2004);InreSmith,270S.W.3d783,796(Tex.App.—Waco2008,orig.proceeding)(Mandamusagainstadistrictclerkisappropriateiftheactsofthedistrictclerkinterferewithappellatecourt’sjurisdiction.).Thisisnotsuchacase.Contrarytorelator’sassertions,rule20oftheTexasRulesofAppellateproceduredoesnotentitleapartytoanadditionalfreecopyoftherecordforhisownpersonaluse.Receivinganadditionalfreecopyisnottheonlymeansofaccesstotherecord.hiyePius,No.07-98-0374-CV,1999WL5078,at*1(Te.App.—AmarilloJan.5,1999,orig.proceeding)(mem.op.).Rule34.5(g)oftherulesofappellateprocedureprovidesthatincriminalcasesanadditionalcopyoftheclerk’srecordmustberetainedbythetrialcourtclerkforthepartiestousewiththecourt’spermission.TEX.R.App.P.34.5(g).ReLatordoesnotallegehepresentedarequestforaccesstothetrialcourtclerk’scopyoftherecordwhichwasdenied.Accordingly,theGraysonCountyclerkhasnotfailedtocomplywithaministerialdutybecauseshedoesnothaveaministerialdutytoproviderelatorwithanadditionalfreecopyoftherecord.WeDENYthepetitionforwritofmandamus./AdaBrown!ADABROWNJUSTICE140757F.P05—2—
#### In the Matter of New York State Urban Development Corporation, *Doing*Business as Empire State Development Corporation, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring in Fee Simple Certain Real Property Currently Owned by Fallsite, LLC, and Known as: 232 Sixth Street, 700 Rainbow Blvd., 231 Sixth Street, 626 Rainbow Blvd., and 701 Falls Street, City of Niagara Falls, Situated in the County of Niagara, State of New York and Having, Respectively, the Following Tax Sections, Blocks and Lots: 159.09-2-25.122, 159.09-2-25.112, 159.09-2-25.121, 159.09-2-25.111 and 159.09-2-25.211, Together with All Compensable Interests Therein Currently Owned by Fallsite, LLC, et al., Appellants.

Submitted August 20, 2012;

decided October 25, 2012

*1085Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000810876
<NAME> MINUTEMAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             322                     322
<SECURITIES>                                     3,332                   3,332
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,289                  15,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                       469                     469
<INVENTORY>                                     18,527                  18,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,385                  38,385
<PP&E>                                          22,406                  22,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,993                  12,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,623                  53,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,094                   8,094
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         6,396                   6,396
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,868                  26,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,623                  53,623
<SALES>                                         16,710                  76,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,710                  76,060
<CGS>                                           11,232                  52,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,925                  69,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (1)                   (316)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (70)                      91
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 192                     791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,594                   6,288
<INCOME-TAX>                                       472                   2,281
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,122                   4,007
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,122                   4,007
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .31                    1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31                    1.12


</TABLE>
# Melkersson-Rosenthal Syndrome

## What is Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome? 

Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome is a rare neurological disorder characterized by recurring facial paralysis, swelling of the face and lips (usually upper lip), and the development of folds and furrows in the tongue. Onset is in childhood or early adolescence. 

After recurrent episodes (ranging from days to years in between), swelling may persist and increase, eventually becoming permanent. The lip may become hard, cracked, and fissured with a reddish-brown discoloration. Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome may recur intermittently after its first appearance, and it can become a chronic (long-lasting) disorder.

The cause of Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome is unknown, but there may be a genetic predisposition. It can be symptomatic of Crohn's disease or sarcoidosis.

Treatment is symptomatic and may include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids to reduce swelling, as well as antibiotics and immunosuppressants. Surgery may be recommended to relieve pressure on the facial nerves and to reduce swollen tissue, but its effectiveness has not been established. Massage and electrical stimulation may also be prescribed.

file-medical

## How can I or my loved one help improve care for people with Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome?

Consider participating in a clinical trial so clinicians and scientists can learn more about Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome and related disorders.  Clinical research uses human volunteers to help researchers learn more about a disorder and perhaps find better ways to safely detect, treat, or prevent disease. 

All types of volunteers are needed—those who are healthy or may have an illness or disease—of all different ages, sexes, races, and ethnicities to ensure that study results apply to as many people as possible, and that treatments will be safe and effective for everyone who will use them. 

For information about participating in clinical research visit NIH Clinical Research Trials and You. Learn about clinical trials currently looking for people with Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome at Clinicaltrials.gov.
> Where can I find more information about Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome?
Information may be available from the following resources:

MedlinePlus

National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD)Phone: 800-999-6673

book-open
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL J. KAHANE , Appellant,

v.

DETECTIVE ANGELA C. FLOWERS and KEN MASCARA, SHERIFF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 19

- 285

[ February 6, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; William L. Roby , Judge; L.T. Case No. 432018CA000544

.

Michael J. Kahane, Defuniak Springs, pro se

.

Harrison A. Joss and Bruce W. Jolly of Purdy, Jolly, Giuffreda,

Barranco & Jisa, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee s

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, C.J., G ROSS and D AMOORGIAN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32





WOOZYFLY, INC.





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,


UNITED STATES CODE)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of WoozyFly, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








October 28, 2009/s/ ERIC STOPPENHAGENInterim President
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3368 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize certain individuals 

to sign claims filed with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on behalf 

of claimants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2010 

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize certain 

individuals to sign claims filed with the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs on behalf of claimants, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS TO 

4 SIGN CLAIMS FILED WITH SECRETARY OF 

5 VETERANS AFFAIRS ON BEHALF OF CLAIM6 ANTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5101 of title 38, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3368 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘A specific’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘(1) A specific’’; and 

4 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

5 paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(2) If an individual has not attained the age of 18 

7 years, is mentally incompetent, or is physically unable to 

8 sign a form, a form filed under paragraph (1) for the indi9 vidual may be signed by a court appointed representative 

10 or a person who is responsible for the care of the indi11 vidual, including a spouse or other relative. If the indi12 vidual is in the care of an institution, the manager or prin13 cipal officer of the institution may sign the form.’’; 

14 (2) in subsection (c)— 

15 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

16 (i) by inserting ‘‘, signs a form on be17 half of a person to apply for,’’ after ‘‘who 

18 applies for’’; and 

19 (ii) by inserting ‘‘, or TIN in the case 

20 that the person is not an individual,’’ after 

21 ‘‘of such person’’; and 

22 (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or 

23 TIN’’ after ‘‘social security number’’ each place 

24 it appears; and 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3368 IS

1 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub2 section: 

3 ‘‘(d) In this section: 

4 ‘‘(1) The term ‘mentally incompetent’ with re5 spect to an individual means that the individual 

6 lacks the mental capacity— 

7 ‘‘(A) to provide substantially accurate in8 formation needed to complete a form; or 

9 ‘‘(B) to certify that the statements made 

10 on a form are true and complete. 

11 ‘‘(2) The term ‘TIN’ has the meaning given the 

12 term in section 7701(a)(41) of the Internal Revenue 

13 Code of 1986.’’. 

14 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by sub15 section (a) shall apply with respect to claims filed on or 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
No. 99-20870 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20870 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MASSOOD DANESH PAJOOH, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CV-3402

-------------------- January 25, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Massood Danesh Pajooh seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to advise him properly as to pleading guilty, in failing to present a proper defense theory, in disallowing him to testify on his own behalf, and in failing to conduct adequate pretrial investigation. He also asserts that he was denied his constitutional right to testify and that the Government engaged in misconduct when it used the perjured testimony of Michael KentNo. 99-20870 -2- Stephens. To obtain a COA, Pajooh must make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See § 2253(c)(2). He has not made such a showing with regard to any of his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. He has, however, made the requisite showing with regard to his claim that his constitutional rights were violated when his counsel refused to permit him to testify. Accordingly, we GRANT him a COA on this issue, VACATE the district court’s judgment, and REMAND with instructions that Pajooh is to file a supplement to his § 2255 motion setting forth in greater detail the circumstances surrounding his failure to testify. See United States v. Martinez , 181 F.3d 627, 628-29 (5th Cir. 1999). If, once this is done, the record does not conclusively show that Pajooh is entitled to no relief, the district court is directed to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Pajooh was denied his right to testify. See United States v. Hughes , 635 F.2d 449, 451 (5th Cir. 1981); § 2255. Pajooh’s request for COA on his other issues is DENIED. His motion for an expedited appeal is DENIED as moot. COA GRANTED in part, DENIED in part; VACATED AND REMANDED.
Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8, No.  333-86494)  pertaining to the American Locker Group  Incorporated 1999
Stock  Incentive Plan of our report dated February 24, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated   financial  statements  and  schedule  of  American  Locker  Group
Incorporated  included  in its  Annual  Report  (Form  10-K) for the year  ended
December 31, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                                  /s/Ernst & Young LLP

Buffalo, New York
March 26, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         246,355
<SECURITIES>                                   372,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               246,355
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 849,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          899,652
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       729,707
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   849,699
<SALES>                                          6,173
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,163
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               127,786
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (118,623)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                249,500
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (587,561)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE: JOHN RISSIO, JOHN CAMERON,

Appellants

______________________ 

2017-1090

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/672,385.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JAMES W. PROSCIA, Brooks Kushman PC, Southfield, 

MI, argued for appellants. Also represented by MARK A.

CANTOR. 

 KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, 

argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by 

NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 
 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and STOLL,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 December 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Bank of Granite Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the periods ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
John A. Forlines, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
Company. Date: March 8, 2004
    
    /s/ John A. Forlines, Jr.John A. Forlines, Jr.Chairman andChief Executive Officer