28886 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 116 / Thursday, June 18, 2009 / Notices 

1 In past segments of this proceeding, the 

Department has included the transaction fees 

relating to the factoring of certain comparison 

market and U.S. sales by CP Kelco Oy through an 

affiliated finance company in its dumping margin 

calculations. However, the Department intends to 

re-examine the appropriateness of including these 

affiliated transactions in its calculations in 

subsequent reviews of this proceeding. 

acquisition of Grupo IMSA (and its 

subsidiary IMSA), demonstrates that 

there was little to no change in 

management structure, supplier 

relationships, or customer base between 

pre–acquisition Hylsa and post– 

acquisition (after the acquisitions of 

Hylsamex and Grupo IMSA) Ternium. 

For these reasons, we preliminarily find 

that Ternium is the successor–ininterest to Hylsa and, thus, should be 

accorded the same antidumping duty 

treatment with respect to standard pipe 

and tube from Mexico as Hylsa. If the 

above preliminary results are affirmed 

in the Department’s final results, the 

cash deposit rate from this changed 

circumstances review will apply to all 

entries of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

changed circumstances review. See 

Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin 

from Italy; Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 

68 FR 25327 (May 12, 2003). 

Public Comment 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.310(c), any interested party may 

request a hearing within 30 days of 

publication of this notice. Any hearing, 

if requested, will be held no later than 

37 days after the date of publication of 

this notice, or the first workday 

thereafter. Case briefs from interested 

parties may be submitted not later than 

30 days after the date of publication of 

this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(ii). Rebuttal briefs, limited to 

the issues raised in those comments, 

may be filed not later than 5 days after 

the time limit for filing the case brief, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(d). All 

written comments shall be submitted in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.303. 

Persons interested in attending the 

hearing, if one is requested, should 

contact the Department for the date and 

time of the hearing. In accordance with 

19 CFR 351.216(e), the Department will 

issue the final results of its antidumping 

duty changed circumstances review not 

later than 270 days after the date on 

which the review is initiated. 

During the course of this antidumping 

duty changed circumstances review, 

deposit requirements for the subject 

merchandise exported and 

manufactured by Ternium will continue 

to be the all–others rate established in 

the investigation. See Notice of 

Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain 

Circular Welded Non–Alloy Steel Pipe 

from Brazil, the Republic of Korea 

(Korea), Mexico, and Venezuela, and 

Amendment to Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain 

Circular Welded Non–Alloy Steel Pipe 

from Korea, 57 FR 49453 (November 2, 

1992). The cash deposit rate will be 

altered, if warranted, pursuant only to 

the final results of this review. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results and notice in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i)(1) and (2) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.216. 

Dated: June 11, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–14366 Filed 6–17–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–405–803] 

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from 

Finland; Notice of Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On April 9, 2009, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published in the Federal 

Register the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on purified 

carboxymethylcellulose from Finland. 

See Purified Carboxymethylcellulose 

from Finland; Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 74 FR 16180 (April 9, 2009) 

(Preliminary Results). We gave 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the Preliminary Results, 

and received no comments. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 18, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tyler Weinhold, or Robert James, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–1121 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 9, 2009, the Department 

published the preliminary results of 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order covering 

purified CMC from Finland. See 

Preliminary Results. The parties subject 

to this review are CP Kelco Oy and CP 

Kelco U.S., Inc. (collectively, CP Kelco). 

The petitioner in this proceeding is the 

Aqualon Company, a division of 

Hercules Incorporated (Petitioner). 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department stated that interested parties 

were to submit case briefs within 30 

days of publication of the Preliminary 

Results and rebuttal briefs within five 

days after the due date for filing case 

briefs. See Preliminary Results at 16185. 

No interested party submitted a case or 

rebuttal brief. On April 8, 2009, we 

issued a supplementary questionnaire to 

CP Kelco to address certain 

inconsistencies in CP Kelco’s U.S. sales 

response. CP Kelco responded on April 

14, 2009, and submitted a corrected U.S. 

sales database. We modified the margin 

calculation program used in the 

Preliminary Results in order to use CP 

Kelco’s April 14, 2009, U.S. sales 

database for the final results. We made 

no other changes for the final results.1

Period of Review 

The period of review (POR) is July 1, 

2007, through June 30, 2008. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order is all purified 

carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), 

sometimes also referred to as purified 

sodium CMC, polyanionic cellulose, or 

cellulose gum, which is a white to off– 

white, non–toxic, odorless, 

biodegradable powder, comprising 

sodium CMC that has been refined and 

purified to a minimum assay of 90 

percent. Purified CMC does not include 

unpurified or crude CMC, CMC 

Fluidized Polymer Suspensions, and 

CMC that is cross–linked through heat 

treatment. Purified CMC is CMC that 

has undergone one or more purification 

operations which, at a minimum, reduce 

the remaining salt and other by–product 

portion of the product to less than ten 

percent. The merchandise subject to this 

order is classified in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States at 

subheading 3912.31.00. This tariff 

classification is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes; 

however, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Final Results of Review 

The Department has determined that 

the following margins exist for the 

period July 1, 2007, through June 30, 

2008: 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 116 / Thursday, June 18, 2009 / Notices 28887 

Manufacturer / Exporter 

Weighted Average 

Margin (percentage) 

CP Kelco ....................... 12.00% 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to these final results, the 

Department has determined, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

for CP Kelco to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of these final results. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we 

calculated importer–specific (or 

customer–specific) ad valorem duty 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of the dumping 

margins calculated for the examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

same sales. We will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review if any importer–specific (or 

customer–specific) assessment rate 

calculated in the final results of this 

review are above de minimis. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties). This clarification 

will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by CP Kelco for which CP Kelco did not 

know the merchandise was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate un– 

reviewed entries at the 6.65 percent all– 

others rate if there is no company– 

specific rate for an intermediary 

involved in the transaction. See Notice 

of Antidumping Duty Orders: Purified 

Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland, 

Mexico, the Netherlands and Sweden, 

70 FR 39734 (July 11, 2005) (Purified 

Carboxymethylcellulose Orders). See 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties for a 

full discussion of this clarification. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Furthermore, the following deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results for all 

shipments of CMC from Finland 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act: 1) 

the cash deposit rate for CP Kelco will 

be the rate established in the final 

results of review; 2) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review or the 

less–than-fair–value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and 3) if neither the 

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm 

covered in this or any previous review 

conducted by the Department, the cash 

deposit rate will be the all–others rate 

of 6.65 percent ad valorem from the 

LTFV investigation. See Purified 

Carboxymethylcellulose Orders. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this POR. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act. 

Dated: June 11, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–14373 Filed 6–17–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–836] 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Review: 

Light–Walled Rectangular Pipe and 

Tube From Mexico 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 27, 2008, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published in the Federal 

Register a notice of initiation of a 

changed circumstances review of the 

antidumping duty order on light–walled 

rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) 

from Mexico in order to determine 

whether Ternium Mexico, S.A. de C.V. 

(Ternium) is the successor–in-interest to 

Hylsa S.A. de C.V. (Hylsa) for purposes 

of determining antidumping duty 

liability. See Notice of Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review: Light–Walled 

Rectangular Pipe and Tube from 

Mexico, 73 FR 63686 (October 27, 2008) 

(Notice of Initiation). We have 

preliminarily determined that Ternium 

is the successor–in-interest to Hylsa for 

purposes of determining antidumping 

duty liability in this proceeding. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 18, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Drury or Brian Davis, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482– 

7924, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department published the 

antidumping duty order of LWRPT from 

Mexico on August 5, 2008. See Light– 

Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from 

Mexico, the People’s Republic of China, 

and the Republic of Korea (Korea): 

Antidumping Duty Orders; Light–Walled 

Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Korea: 

Notice of Amended Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 FR 

45403 (August 5, 2008). 

On September 3, 2008, Ternium filed 

a request for a changed circumstances 

review of the antidumping duty order of 

LWRPT from Mexico (Initial 

Submission), claiming that Hylsa, a 

Mexican producer of LWRPT, changed 

its name to Ternium. Ternium requested