alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SYBRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          27,726
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  180,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,113
<INVENTORY>                                    166,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               419,605
<PP&E>                                         206,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                 167,934
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,401,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          158,677
<BONDS>                                        741,880
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,008
<OTHER-SE>                                     438,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,401,773
<SALES>                                        695,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               695,638
<CGS>                                          342,974
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  223,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   152
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 86,821
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,468
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,353
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,353
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47<F1>
<FN>
<F1>(As adjusted for the two-for-one stock split effective February 20, 1998. Prior
Financial Data Schedules other than for the periods ended March 31, 1998 and
1997 and December 31, 1997 and 1996, have not been restated to reflect the
stock split.)
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# NIH research matter Feed

A weekly summary of research developments and discoveries at the National Institutes of Health (NIH)

- Gut bacteria may reduce cholesterol and lower heart disease risk Researchers pinpointed gut bacteria that affect levels of cholesterol and other compounds linked to heart disease.
- Rejuvenating the immune system by depleting certain stem cells Researchers found that depleting certain stem cells improved the immune systems of aged mice.
- Sensor monitors bladder fullness Researchers developed a wireless implantable device that can monitor bladder filling and emptying in real time and send data to a smartphone.
- How lung distress from SARS-CoV-2 can cause heart damage Researchers found that SARS-CoV-2 can damage heart tissue without directly infecting it.
- Gum disease-related bacteria tied to colorectal cancer Scientists identified a specific subtype of bacteria implicated in gum disease that may promote the growth of colorectal tumors.
- Skin test detects evidence of Parkinson’s and related disorders A study showed that a simple skin biopsy could identify people who had Parkinson’s disease or similar disorders with a high degree of accuracy.
- Weight-loss surgery yields long-term benefits for type 2 diabetes Bariatric surgery helped people with type 2 diabetes better control their blood glucose years later compared to medical and lifestyle interventions.
- Altered brain connections in youth with ADHD Youth with ADHD have elevated brain activity connecting the frontal cortex with the information processing centers deep in the brain.
- Coordinating speech and breathing in the brain Researchers identified a brain circuit that controls vocalization and prevents it from interfering with breathing in mice.
- Talk therapy cuts risk of postpartum depression An intervention given to pregnant women by non-specialist providers greatly reduced the chances of developing postpartum depression or anxiety.
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jeremy Frommer, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this Form 10-Q/A of Jerrick Media Holdings, Inc.;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report;



|Date:
    September 2, 2016 | By: | /s/
    Jeremy Frommer          
|--------------------------- | --- | --------------------------------
|                            |     | Jeremy
    Frommer              
|                            |     | Principal
    Executive Officer 
|                            |     | Jerrick
    Media Holdings, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Tel Group, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (“Company”), on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Untied States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Carlos A. Trujillo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By: /s/ Carlos A. Trujillo


Carlos A. Trujillo


Chief Financial Officer


April 15, 2010





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Tel Group, Inc. and will be retained by China Tel Group, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Exhibit 10.36







AMENDMENT AND EXTENSION TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT AND EXTENSION is entered into and effective as of the 8th day of March 2011, by and between BUTLER NATIONAL CORPORATION, a Kansas corporation (“Employer”) and CLARK D. STEWART of Olathe, Kansas.







RECITALS







Employer desires to continue to employ Employee through 2021, and Employee wishes to continue employment with Employer through 2021, and from time to time, Employer and Employee have extended the Employment Agreement between Employer and Employee dated the 17th day of March, 1994.







AGREEMENT







NOW, THEREFORE, on the basis of the respective promises and agreements, the parties agree that the provisions of the Employment Agreement dated the 17th day of March, 1994 shall be extended and continue in effect to, and including, December 31, 2021.







All of the terms of the Employment Agreement dated the 17th day of March, 1994 shall continue in full force and effect with the exception of the following previous amendments:







1.            The parties agree that Employee shall receive a salary increase of five percent (5%) per year for each year of this Amendment and Extension to the Employment Agreement.







2.            The term of the Employment Agreement dated the 17th day of March, 1994 shall be extended to, and including, December 31, 2021.







3.            The address for section 9.0 of Employer shall be changed to:19920 W. 161st Street, Olathe, Kansas 66062.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment and Extension to Employment Agreement as of the day and year first written above.







BUTLER NATIONAL CORPORATION


 


By /s/ R. Warren Wagoner


R. Warren Wagoner


Its Chairman of the Board of Directors







EMPLOYEE:


 


/s Clark D. Stewart


Clark D. Stewart
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50391 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARCO ANTONIO ORTIZ-GOMEZ, also known asAntonioGomez, also known as Antonio Ortiz Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:06-CR-178-2 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Marco Antonio Ortiz-Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ortiz-Gomez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50391

2 GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
#### Carolyn Johnson et al., Respondents, v Allstate Insurance Company, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 415]

In an action to recover damages for breach of an insurance contract, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brennan, J.), dated November 21, 2005, as granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion for leave to serve an amended complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the cross motion is denied.

The first cause of action in the original complaint sought compensatory damages of $5,000,000 for breach of an insurance policy, and the second cause of action sought compensatory and punitive damages in the sum of $5,000,000 for malicious intent, undue hardship, and bad faith refusal to honor the plaintiffs’ rights and remedies under the insurance policy.

The defendant moved to dismiss the second cause of action and the plaintiff cross-moved for leave to amend that cause of action to allege an intentional refusal to pay benefits “maliciously and . . . [in] wanton disregard of the rights of the plaintiffs.” The court granted the cross motion for leave to serve an amended complaint on the ground that there was no prejudice to the defendant *(see*CPLR 3025).

Since the cross motion was made in response to a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR former 3211 (e), the plaintiffs were required to establish a “good ground” for granting leave to re-plead *(Carle Place Union Free School Dist. v Bat-Jac Constr., Inc.,*28 AD3d 596 [2006]). We note that recent amendments to CPLR 3211 (e) do not apply to this case because those amendments apply only to actions commenced after January 1, 2006 *(see*L 2005, ch 616; *Andux v Woodbury Auto Park, Inc.,*30 AD3d 362 [2006]).

*666The amended second cause of action is duplicative of the first cause of action. There is no separate tort for bad faith refusal to comply with an insurance contract. Thus, both the first cause of action and the amended second cause of action sound in breach of contract *(see Zawahir v Berkshire Life Ins. Co.,*22 AD3d 841 [2005]; *Continental Cas. Co. v Nationwide Indem. Co.,*16 AD3d 353 [2005]). Further, to recover punitive damages, conduct must be alleged which is part of a pattern directed at the public generally, which was not alleged here *(see New York Univ. v Continental Ins. Co.,*87 NY2d 308, 316 [1995]).

Accordingly, the proposed amendment failed to state a cause of action and the plaintiffs’ cross motion should have been denied. Florio, J.E, Goldstein, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.1 - Exhibit B Form of Compliance Certificate






EXHIBIT B
FORM OF COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
This Compliance Certificate is delivered to you by the Borrower pursuant to Sections 6.1(c) and 6.1(g) of the Credit Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2013 (as amended, supplemented, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”; unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among M/I HOMES, INC., an Ohio corporation (the “Borrower”), the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties thereto as lenders, including the Swingline Lender and the Issuing Lender (collectively, the “Lenders”), PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as administrative agent for the Lenders (the “Administrative Agent”) and the other agents party thereto.  This Compliance Certificate relates to the accounting period ending __________, 20__.  I, the undersigned, on behalf of the Borrower, do certify on behalf of the Borrower that:
1.    I am (a) the Chief Executive Officer, President or an Executive Vice President of the Borrower or (b) an Authorized Financial Officer of the Borrower.
2.    I have reviewed and am familiar with the contents of this Compliance Certificate.
3.    [I, on behalf of the Borrower, have read the Credit Agreement and, based on an examination which I have deemed sufficient to enable me to make an informed statement, there does not exist,  as at the end of the accounting period covered by the financial statements filed with or furnished to the SEC by the Borrower pursuant to Section [6.1(a] [6.1(b)] of the Credit Agreement, any Default or Event of Default except as set forth below:]1 
4.    Attached hereto as Attachment 1 are the computations showing compliance with the covenants set forth in Sections 7.1, 7.4(f) and 7.4(g) of the Credit Agreement as of the accounting period set forth above.






[Signature page follows.]














1Not to be included in the Compliance Certificate delivered on the Closing Date pursuant to Section 5.1(g), because absence of Default or Event of Default is covered by Officer's Certificate delivered pursuant to Section 5.1(f).













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Compliance Certificate this ___ day of ________, 20___.
M/I HOMES, INC., an Ohio corporation
By:_____________________________
Name:                    
Title:                    











Attachment 1
to Exhibit B
Compliance with Covenants


[To be supplied by Borrower]
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  By:
    /S/ Joshua G. JamesDate: November 10, 2008
    
    Name:
    Joshua G. JamesTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  By:
    /S/ Michael S. HerringDate: November 10, 2008
    
    Name:
    Michael S. HerringTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
and Executive Vice President(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) A signed original of each of the written statements above required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Omniture, Inc. and will be retained by Omniture,
Inc. and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 The forgoing certifications are being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, and
they shall not be considered filed as part of such report
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6059

FRANCIS C. MBEWE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNKNOWN NAMES, (MCDCR) Montgomery County Department of 

Correction and Rehabilitation Mail Room Clerks; DAVID, Cpt., 

Head of Montgomery County Department of Correction and 

Rehabilitation (MCDCR) Mail Room; RICHARD DOVEY, C.O.S., 

Chief of Security of MCI-H; RICHARD, C.O. II, former 

Property Room Officer of MCI-H; WACH, Mr., Case Manager; 

STEVENUS, Ms., Librarian, MCI-H; MCI-H; MCDCR MAIL ROOM,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

STOUFFER, C.D.C, Head of Correction for the State of 

Maryland; SOWERS, Warden (former) m MCI-H; WEBB, Warden, 

MCI-H; SCOTT, MJ, Shift Commander, MCI-H; CLEVENGER, C.O. 

II, Tier Officer for B2; WILLIAMS, Lt., Unit Manager of 

Northside MCI-H; POWELL, Lt., former Unit Manager of 

Northside MCI-H; VINSON, C.O. II, Dietary Officer of MCI-H; 

WORGUL, C.O. II, Dietary Officer of MCI-H; HULL, Cpt., 

Dietary Manager of MCI-H,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District 

Judge. (8:12-cv-03344-AW)

Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 22, 2014
2

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis C. Mbewe, Appellant Pro Se. Silvia Carolina Kinch, 

OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Rockville, Maryland; Siobhan 

Kelly Madison, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Francis C. Mbewe appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint against the 

Appellees for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Mbewe v. Unknown 

Names, No. 8:12-cv-03344-AW (D. Md. Dec. 3, 2013). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Chui Fong Lam, Respondent, v Spring Scaffolding, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[824 NYS2d 337]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bayne, J.), dated February 17, 2005, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

While we affirm the order of the Supreme Court, we do so on a ground other than that relied upon by the Supreme Court. The defendants did not satisfy their initial prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). The affirmed medical report of the defendants’ examining orthopedist merely *956noted that the plaintiff had “full” range of motion in the cervical and lumbosacral regions of her spine, as well as her left shoulder, without setting forth the objective test or tests performed supporting these conclusions *(see Nembhard v Delatorre,*16 AD3d 390 [2005]; *Black v Robinson,*305 AD2d 438 [2003]). Moreover, while the affirmed medical report of the defendants’ examining neurologist set forth findings concerning the range of motion of the cervical and thoracolumbar regions of the plaintiffs spine, those findings were not compared to the normal range of motion *(see Sullivan v Dawes, 28*AD3d 472 [2006]; *Browdame v Candura,*25 AD3d 747 [2006]; *Paulino v Dedios,*24 AD3d 741 [2005]; *Kennedy v Brown,*23 AD3d 625 [2005]; *Baudilio v Pam Car & Truck Rental, Inc.,*23 AD3d 420 [2005]; *Manceri v Bowe,*19 AD3d 462 [2005]; *Aronov v Leybovich,*3 AD3d 511 [2004]).

Since the defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in the first instance, it is unnecessary to consider whether the plaintiff’s papers, submitted in opposition, raised a triable issue of fact *(see Coscia v 938 Trading Corp.,*283 AD2d 538 [2001]). Miller, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Concho Resources Inc.
(Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 5, 2009
    /s/ Darin G. HoldernessDarin G. HoldernessVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

ERIC STEWART, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

RAYMOND BANACH, LAWRENCE 

FLANSBURG AND WESTFALL 

TOWNSHIP, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 525 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 2nd day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.