alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.3
                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-C  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 13th day of November, 2007.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-C
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-C and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-C and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         7,455
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  66,477
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    85,882
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,310
<PP&E>                                         48,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (20,695)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,113,215
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,677
<OTHER-SE>                                     (887,610)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,282
<SALES>                                        336,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               336,948
<CGS>                                          73,249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               476,960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (221,570)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consentto the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment toRegistration Statement No. 333-66986 of BarrPharmaceuticals, Inc., formerly Barr Laboratories, Inc., onForm S-4 and in the Registration Statement Nos. 33-73696,33-73698, 333-17349, 333-17351, 333-50356, 333-75388, 333-75390,333-102070 and 333-102072 of BarrPharmaceuticals, Inc., formerly Barr Laboratories, Inc., onForm S-8 of our report dated March 1, 2007 (which reportexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph relating to the adoption of Statement of FinancialAccounting Standard No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment) relating tothe financial statements and financial statement schedule of BarrPharmaceuticals, Inc. and of our report dated March 1, 2007relating to management’s report on the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, each appearing in the TransitionReport on Form 10-K/T of BarrPharmaceuticals, Inc. for the six months ended December 31, 2006./s/  Deloitte& Touche LLP
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Patrick M. Flynn, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 of Blue Ridge Real Estate Company and Big Boulder Corporation (together , the Registrants);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants boards of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: February 14, 2006



/s/ Patrick M. Flynn

Patrick M. Flynn

Chief Executive Officer

and President
# Multimedia About Genetics

Genes to Mental Health Network Open Session Meeting

Facebook Live: Understanding Schizophrenia

Facebook Live: Bipolar Disorder in Adults

Director’s Innovation Speaker Series: How Looking at Genetics and Networks Led to Solving a Quantum Gravity Problem

Let’s Talk About Eating Disorders with NIMH Grantee Dr. Cynthia Bulik

Workshop: Gene-based Therapeutics for Rare Genetic Neurodevelopmental Psychiatric Disorders

Gabrielle Michel, Winner of the 2021 Three-Minute Talks Competition

Workshop: Genes to Biology: Integrative Systematic Approaches for Revealing Biological Functions of Psychiatric Risk Genes and Alleles

Workshop: Genes to Biology: Integrative Systematic Approaches for Revealing Biological Functions of Psychiatric Risk Genes and Alleles: Breakout Rooms

Elisa Dumett, Ph.D., Winner of the 2018 NIMH Three-Minute Talks Competition

Kaela Kuitchoua, Winner of the 2019 Three-Minute Talks Competition

PsychENCODE - the molecular architecture of the brain

Elisa Dummett Torres, Winner of the 2019 Three-Minute Talks Competition

PMDD Linked to Gene Network

iPS Cells & Organoids - Sci-Fi vs Reality

Genes Impact Suspect Cortex Areas More as Youth Mature
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Joshua G. James, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Omniture, Inc. (the “Registrant”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and          (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:  August 11, 2006 /s/ Joshua G. James        Joshua G. James    Chief Executive Officer and President
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 376 

Recognizing Israeli-American heritage and the contributions of the IsraeliAmerican community to the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2019 

Mr. ZELDIN (for himself, Ms. MENG, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, and Mr. 

ROSE of New York) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Israeli-American heritage and the contributions 

of the Israeli-American community to the United States. 

Whereas there are currently up to 800,000 Israeli-Americans 

contributing to our society; 

Whereas the values of Israelis and Israeli-Americans are 

shared American values; 

Whereas Israeli-Americans bring invaluable skills that promote our economy and national security, such as expertise in cybersecurity and water technologies; 

Whereas hundreds of Israeli startups have been brought to 

the United States; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 376 IH 

Whereas the contributions of Israeli-Americans in the fields 

of high-tech and biotech have been invaluable to the 

United States; 

Whereas Israeli-Americans have helped to form a strong bond 

between the people of the United States and the people 

of Israel, reinforcing our shared values and interests; and 

Whereas countless Israeli-Americans and Israeli-based companies have enriched the society of the United States, including— 

(1) Israeli-based companies operating in the United 

States creating tens of thousands of jobs in the United 

States; 

(2) Israeli engineers based in the United States developing the Intel’s Pentium M chip, which revolutionized 

the mobile computer world; 

(3) Israeli-American engineer Abraham Karem being 

the pioneer of the unmanned aerial vehicle, and described 

by The Economist magazine as the man who ‘‘created the 

robotic plane that transformed the way modern warfare 

is waged and continues to pioneer other airborne innovations’’; and 

(4) Israeli-American businesswoman Safra Catz, 

CEO of Oracle, being one of the most successful female 

business executives in the United States: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives affirms 

2 that the Israeli-American community has contributed im3 mensely to American society and culture. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jocelyn Clermont, Appellant.

Submitted October 9, 2012;

decided October 18, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
[993 NE2d 1264, 971 NYS2d 243]

#### Island Park, LLC, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

Argued May 30, 2013;

decided June 26, 2013

*982APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Young/Sommer LLC,*Albany (J. *Michael Naughton*of counsel), for appellant.

*Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General,*Albany *(Andrew D. Bing, William E. Storrs, Peter H. Schiff*and *Barbara D. Underwood*of counsel), for respondent.

*Elizabeth Dribusch, General Counsel, New York Farm Bureau,*Albany *(Cynthia Feathers*of counsel), for New York Farm Bureau, amicus curiae.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Claimant brought this action in the Court of Claims to recover compensation for an alleged regulatory taking of its property. The basis for the claim is that the State Department of Transportation required the closure of a railroad crossing that claimant had used to move equipment from one part of its land to another. The record shows that the Department ordered the closure after it determined that the crossing presented a safety hazard. It found that fast-moving trains passed by frequently; that a curve in the tracks limited the distance at which a train could be seen from the crossing; that heavy, slow-moving farm equipment was being transported over the tracks; and that there was a substantial grade at the approaches to the crossing, which made it necessary for crossing vehicles to reduce their speed. In a CPLR article 78 proceeding brought by claimant, the Department’s determination was upheld as being supported by *983substantial evidence *(Matter of Island Park, LLC v New York State Dept. of Transp.,*61 AD3d 1023 [3d Dept 2009]).

On this record, the conclusion is inescapable that the closure of the crossing was a proper exercise of the State’s police power. Moreover, claimant has failed to show the extent to which the Department’s action diminished the value of its land, and has not argued that its easement to cross the railroad tracks should be treated for these purposes as an item of property separate from the land itself. Claimant’s claim of a regulatory taking is without merit.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
#### In the Matter of Annette J.S.J. Administration for Children’s Services et al., Respondents; Rebecca F., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Sabrina R.M.I. Administration for Children’s Services et al., Respondents; Rebecca F., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Submitted July 29, 2013;

decided September 17, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceedings within the meaning of the Constitution.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 14, 2015

jam

Order 

Clerk

July 14, 2015

151949 (22)

EDDIE POPE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 151949

COA: 326137

CENTRAL MICHIGAN CORRECTIONAL 

FACILITY WARDEN, 

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $9.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$366.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
Order entered October 23, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00709-CR

WILLIAM AUTREY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-16130-Q

ORDER

The clerk’s and reporter’s records are overdue in this appeal. Court reporter Marissa 

Garza was previously granted one thirty-day extension of time to file the reporter’s record. On 

October 1, 2013, the Dallas County District Clerk filed a letter stating that appellant has not paid 

for the clerk’s record. However, the documents before this Court reflect that appellant is 

represented by court-appointed counsel.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding 

whether appellant has been deprived of the clerk’s and reporter’s records because of ineffective 

counsel, indigence, or for any other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.
 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.

 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed.

 The trial court shall next determine the date by which the clerk’s record will be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written 

findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY 

DAYS of the date of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be 

reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
97-536.

#### Gibbs v. State.

In Habeas Corpus. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Exhibit (99.2)


  Written Statement of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. s.1350


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. s.1350, I, the undersigned
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Banta Corporation (the
"Corporation"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended December 28, 2002 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



                                       /s/ Gerald A. Henseler
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Gerald A. Henseler
                                       Executive Vice President and Chief
                                        Financial Officer


                                       March 27, 2003
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Date
#### In the Matter of Walter Adelman, Appellant, v Michael A. Gary, Respondent.

Submitted July 16, 2012;

decided September 6, 2012

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.