alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 201 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 201

   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Energy and 
            Commerce in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2019

   Mr. Pallone (for himself and Mr. Walden) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Energy and 
            Commerce in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Energy and Commerce (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $22,584,586 for the One Hundred 
Sixteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $11,292,293 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2019, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2020; and
            (2) not more than $11,292,293 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2020, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2021.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Greenlee Henry, Also Known as Henry Greenlee, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 441]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William I. Mogulescu, J.), rendered May 6, 2004, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree and assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, *455to concurrent terms of 16 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the DNA databank fee, and otherwise affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility.

As the People concede, since the crime was committed prior to the effective date of the legislation (Penal Law § 60.35 [1] [a] [v] [former (1) (e)]), providing for the imposition of a DNA databank fee, that fee should not have been imposed. Concur— Buckley, RJ., Tom, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                             BAY STATE GAS COMPANY
 
               STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF
                           EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            1997        1996        1995        1994        1993
                                           -------     -------     -------     -------     -------
<S>                                        <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings:
     Net income..........................  $26,062     $27,072     $23,128     $24,485     $22,807
     Adjustments:
          Income taxes...................   16,979      16,953      14,575      15,642      13,726
          Fixed charges (as below).......   21,192      21,522      19,365      17,359      15,906
                                           -------     -------     -------     -------     -------
               Total adjusted earnings...  $64,233     $65,547     $57,068     $57,486     $52,439
                                           =======     =======     =======     =======     =======
Fixed charges:
     Total interest expense..............  $18,255     $17,345     $17,300     $15,305     $13,610
     Interest component of rents.........    2,937       4,177       2,065       2,054       2,296
                                           -------     -------     -------     -------     -------
               Total fixed charges.......  $21,192     $21,522     $19,365     $17,359     $15,906
                                           =======     =======     =======     =======     =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.......     3.03        3.05        2.95        3.31        3.30
                                           =======     =======     =======     =======     =======
</TABLE>
 
                                       40
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 193 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 193

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Budget in 
                  the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2019

 Mr. Yarmuth submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Budget in 
                  the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on the Budget (hereafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the expenses of 
all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 
of the House of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 
not more than $10,380,424 for the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,190,212 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2019, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2020; and
            (2) not more than $5,190,212 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2020, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2021.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Mark T. Wood, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of GlobalNet Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

April 16, 2004


                                   /s/  Mark T. Wood
                                        ------------
                                        Mark T. Wood
                                        Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit
        99.2**
 
 CERTIFICATE
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
            connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB/A of
            Loma Verde Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended March 31,
            2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
            hereof,
            I, Peter Hill, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify,
            pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
            of the
            Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
            belief:
 1.
              The Report
                  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
                  of the
                  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
                  Company.
 
 September
            1, 2006
  PETER
        HILL
 Peter
        Hill
 Chief
        Executive Officer,
 President
        and Director








-1-
H. Res. 354 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 21, 2019. 

Whereas Congress passed the 19th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, guided by the shared 

ideals of freedom, sovereignty, democracy, civil liberties, 

and individual rights; 

Whereas from 1919 to 1920, the Sixty-Sixth Congress debated, and State legislatures considered, an amendment 

to the Constitution to provide suffrage for women; 

Whereas on May 21, 1919, the House of Representatives approved a proposed amendment, followed by the Senate a 

few weeks later on June 4, 1919; 

Whereas the introduction, passage, and ultimate ratification 

of the 19th Amendment were the culmination of decades 

of work and struggle by advocates for the rights of 

women across the United States and worldwide; 

Whereas the ratification of the 19th Amendment ensured 

women could more fully participate in our democracy and 

fundamentally changed the role of women in the civic life 

of our Nation; 

Whereas August 18, 2020, marks the centennial of the ratification of the 19th Amendment by three-fourths of the 

States, providing the support necessary under article V of 

the Constitution of the United States; 
2 

•HRES 354 EH 

Whereas August 26, 2020, marks the centennial of the 19th 

Amendment becoming a part of the Constitution of the 

United States, providing for women’s suffrage; and 

Whereas the centennial anniversary of the ratification of the 

19th Amendment represents a historical milestone to be 

lauded and celebrated: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) celebrates the 100th anniversary of the passage 

and ratification of the 19th Amendment, providing for 

women’s suffrage, to the Constitution of the United 

States; 

(2) honors the role of the ratification of the 19th 

Amendment in further fulfilling the promise of the Constitution of the United States and promoting the core 

values of our democracy; 

(3) reaffirms the opportunity for people in the 

United States to learn about and commemorate the efforts of the women’s suffrage movement and the role of 

women in our democracy; and 

(4) reaffirms the desire of Congress to continue 

strengthening democratic participation and to inspire fu-
3 

•HRES 354 EH 

ture generations to cherish and preserve the historic 

precedent established under the 19th Amendment. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sarael Morales, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 334]

*983Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), dated April 14, 2005, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The hearing court correctly determined that the People met their burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the facts that supported the defendant’s adjudication as a level three sex offender *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *People v Ruddy,*31 AD3d 517 [2006]; *People v Perser,*29 AD3d 767 [2006]). The defendant admitted that at the time he committed the crimes against his victim, he was abusing alcohol and marijuana. Consequently, the Supreme Court properly assessed 15 points under the 11th risk factor (drug or alcohol abuse). Additionally, the Case Summary and Risk Assessment Instrument established that the defendant had not accepted responsibility for his crime, and he admitted that he had refused treatment *(see People v Thompson,*31 AD3d 409 [2006]; *People v Fortin,*29 AD3d 765, 766 [2006]; *People v Sinclair,*23 AD3d 537 [2005]; *People v Mitchell,*300 AD2d 377 [2002]). Therefore, the court was justified in assessing 15 points under the 12th risk factor (acceptance of responsibility). In the absence of evidence of circumstances warranting a departure from the presumptive risk level *(see People v Maiello,*32 AD3d 463 [2006]; *People v Inghilleri,*21 AD3d 404, 405-406 [2005]; *cf. People v Abdullah,*31 AD3d 515 [2006]), the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion by refusing to depart.

The defendant’s remaining claims are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Miller, J.R, Crane, Santucci and Luciano, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vincent Thomas, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 716]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), rendered October 13, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Florio, J.P., Crane, Luciano, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.
# Paroxysmal Choreoathetosis

## What is paroxysmal choreoathetosis?

Paroxysmal choreoathetosis (also known as paroxysmal kinesigenic choreathetosis) is a neurological disorder that involves episodes of unwanted, uncontrollable movements, often of the muscles in the arms, legs, face, and body. One or both sides of the body may be affected. 

The episodes can be as short as 10 seconds or last longer than an hour. The frequency of episodes varies from person to person, with some people having only one episode a month to others having several a day. Paroxysmal choreoathetosis can be triggered by sudden movements, such as standing up quickly. People may feel their muscles get tight before an episode starts or a tingling sensation.

Some people may have episodes:
              - After drinking alcohol or caffeine
              - When cold
              - When tired or stressed

Paroxysmal choreoathetosis often begins in childhood or adolescence. It can affect a few members of a family, or only one person. The cause is unknown but the disorder may be associated with the PRRT2 gene which is also connected to epilepsy. There is no test to conclusively diagnose paroxysmal choreoathetosis. The drug carbamazepine is most often used to treat the disorder.  

file-medical

## How can I or a loved one help improve care for people with paroxysmal choreoathetosis?

Consider participating in a clinical trial so clinicians and scientists can learn more about paroxysmal choreoathetosis and related disorders. Clinical research uses human volunteers to help researchers learn more about a disorder and perhaps find better ways to safely detect, treat, or prevent disease. 

All types of volunteers are needed—those who are healthy or may have an illness or disease—of all different ages, sexes, races, and ethnicities to ensure that study results apply to as many people as possible, and that treatments will be safe and effective for everyone who will use them. 

For information about participating in clinical research visit NIH Clinical Research Trials and You. Learn about clinical trials currently looking for people with paroxysmal choreoathetosis at Clinicaltrials.gov.
> Where can I find more information about paroxysmal choreoathetosis?
Information may be available from the following organizations and resources:

Dystonia Medical Research Foundation

MedlinePlus

National Organization of Rare Disorders (NORD)Phone: 203-744-0100 or 800-999-6673

book-open
#### BOWLES v. ALFORD.

Civ. No. 5434.

District Court, N. D. California, N. D.

April *29,*1946.

*289Galen E. Bush, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

H. L. Chamberlain and Myron Moyle, both of Modesto, Cal., for defendant.

WELSH, District Judge.

Defendant moved for a more definite statement and a bill of particulars. The motion for a more definite statement is denied.

Defendant’s first point is that he is entitled to know the dates when, and the persons from whom he is alleged to have demanded and received rental higher than the maximum rents permitted by the rent regulations, the amount in each case thereof higher than the maximum rent so permitted, and in each case the number or designation and location of the room or rooms for which said rents are alleged to have been demanded and received.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges in this behalf: “Since July 1, 1942 defendant demanded and received rents higher than the maximum rents permitted by said rent regulation for the use and occupancy of such accommodations.” Said complaint was filed December 29, 1945.

Defendant is accordingly faced with the problem of answering the allegation that between July 1, 1942 and December 29, 1945, he violated the rent regulation for hotels and rooming houses by demanding and receiving rents higher than the maximum permitted thereby.

This Court is impressed with the fairness of defendant’s contentions with respect to the first count of plaintiff’s complaint. His counsel argues in his brief that what is sought by the present motion is a statement sufficient to identify the particular violations upon which the plaintiff may depend with sufficient particularity to enable defendant to answer. He points out that it is advisable to have the issues framed by the pleadings before according the parties a right to unlimited discovery as to matters which will not be put in issue.

Views relative to the exercise of judicial discretion in requiring bills of particulars in suits brought by the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration have been expressed in Bowles v. Sebastopol Berry Growers’ Association, D.C., 4 F.R.D. 502 and Bowles v. Schlamberg, 5 F.R.D. 287. In accordance therewith, it is ordered that defendant’s motion be granted with respect to the first count.

The second count of the complaint charges that defendant rented rooms without posting signs; the third count that he did not keep or make available for examination by the Administrator records showing the rents received and other matters; the fourth count that he rented certain rooms without filing any Registration Statements correctly setting forth all maximum rents established for said rooms, all as required by said Regulation. Attorneys for plaintiff argued orally and in their brief that these matters were purely within the knowledge of the defendant. The Court agrees that the defendant, either personally or by his agents and employees, has available information as to these matters so that he can answer the allegations of the complaint. His motion for bill of particulars is accordingly denied insofar as the second, third and fourth counts are concerned.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 14, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-900 Lower Tribunal No. 19-7742

________________ Elizabeth Maya, Appellant, vs. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc.,

Appellee. An Appeal from non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge. Elizabeth Maya, in proper person. Lapin & Leichtling, LLP, and Jan T. Williams, for appellee. Before SCALES, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.