alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 44 

Expressing support for the designation of the week of January 20 through 

January 26, 2019, as ‘‘National School Choice Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2019 

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, and Mr. MARINO) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education 

and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of the week of January 20 through January 26, 2019, as ‘‘National School 

Choice Week’’. 

Whereas providing a diversity of choices in K–12 education 

empowers parents to select education environments that 

meet the individual needs and strengths of their children; 

Whereas high-quality K–12 education environments of all varieties are available in the United States, including traditional public schools, public charter schools, public magnet schools, private schools, online academies, and home 

schooling; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 44 IH 

Whereas talented teachers and school leaders in each of the 

education environments prepare children to achieve their 

dreams; 

Whereas more families than ever before in the United States 

actively choose the best education for their children; 

Whereas more public awareness of the issue of parental 

choice in education can inform additional families of the 

benefits of proactively choosing challenging, motivating, 

and effective education environments for their children; 

Whereas the process by which parents choose schools for 

their children is nonpolitical, nonpartisan, and deserves 

the utmost respect; and 

Whereas tens of thousands of events are planned to celebrate 

the benefits of educational choice during the 9th annual 

National School Choice Week, held the week of January 

20 through January 26, 2019: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National 

3 School Choice Week’’; 

4 (2) congratulates students, parents, teachers, 

5 and school leaders from K–12 education environ6 ments of all varieties for their persistence, achieve7 ments, dedication, and contributions to society in the 

8 United States; 

9 (3) encourages all parents, during National 

10 School Choice Week, to learn more about the edu11 cation options available to them; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 44 IH 

1 (4) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to hold appropriate programs, events, and activities 

3 during National School Choice Week to raise public 

4 awareness of the benefits of opportunity in edu5 cation. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-10024

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE MANUEL GONZALEZ-GONZALEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cr-00065-CEM-EJK-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 22-10024 Date Filed: 09/15/2022 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-10024

Before LUCK, LAGOA, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant 

to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. 

See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) 

(sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly 

and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 

1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver 

of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).

USCA11 Case: 22-10024 Date Filed: 09/15/2022 Page: 2 of 2
# Ending Structural Racism
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 21

- 10883 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:03

- cr - 00016

- MW

- MAF

- 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,
versus HERNANDEZ LOPAZ DANIELS, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

________________________ (September 3, 2021) Before JILL PRYOR , BRANCH and LUCK , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 21-10883 Date Filed: 09/03/2021 Page: 1 of 22 Randolph Murrell, counsel for Hernandez Lopaz Daniels in this appeal of the denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 404(b), 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (“First Step Act”) , has moved to withdraw from further representat ion of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and the district court’s denial of Daniels’s motion for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act is AFFIRMED
.

USCA11 Case: 21-10883 Date Filed: 09/03/2021 Page: 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6367

FELIPE FRANCO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (2:06-cv-00293-RAJ)

Submitted: September 5, 2007 Decided: September 19, 2007

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Felipe Franco, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Felipe Franco seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Franco has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We grant Franco’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma

pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Vol! of 1

lO*V */¥

COA # 10-13-00153-CR OFFENSE: Theft

STYLE: Donald Eugene Mims v. The State of Texas COUNTY: Brazos

TRIAL COURT:

TRIAL COURT #:

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Hon. J. P. Langley

DISPOSITION: Affirmed

85th District Court

10-03653-CRF-85

DATE: June 26, 2014

JUSTICE: ChiefJustice Gray PC

PUBLISH:

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR:

APP BR:

DNP:

May 21, 2013

November 20, 2013

May 15, 2014

February 18, 2014

FOR REHEARING IS:

DATE:

JUDGE:

MOTION

SUPP CLK RECORD:

SUPP RPT RECORD:

SUPP BR:

CORRECTED BR: March 4, 2014

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AfPFLLMTS Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

re.fl><eW

DATE: A*. //? . -ZO/y

JUDGE: /°<C

CCA IS:.

JUDGE:

/>"

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN

ON

CCA#

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP: -—

MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

ON

JUDGE:

VoL I of 2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00472-CV

Howard Bart Freidman, Appellant

v.

Deborah Jenkins, Appellee

FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-FM-22-002444, THE HONORABLE JESSICA MANGRUM, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant Howard Bart Freidman’s brief was originally due October 3, 2022.

After resolving a jurisdictional question, this Court reset the brief due date to November 18, 

2022. This Court granted two extensions of time to file the brief in part because Freidman 

asserted he was seeking to obtain counsel, making the brief due on or before February 2, 2023. 

Freidman has filed a third motion for extension of time in which he asserts that he has obtained 

counsel who is becoming familiar with the record, a process hampered by the winter storm of 

early February 2023. Appellee Deborah Jenkins opposes the extension, in part noting that 

Freidman did not identify his new counsel and no new counsel has appeared in this appeal.

We grant the motion and extend the deadline for filing Freidman’s brief until 

March 3, 2023. We caution Freidman and any counsel he may retain that no further extensions 
2

will be granted and that failure to file the brief timely may result in the dismissal of this appeal

for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. 42.3(b).

Ordered on February 9, 2023.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION 

2000 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
 ON Semiconductor Corporation, formerly SCG Holding Corporation (the “Company”) previously approved and adopted the SCG Holding Corporation 2000 Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”). The
Plan has been amended on a number of occasions. By this instrument, the Company desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares available for purchase under the Plan from its existing 15,000,000 shares to 18,000,000 shares. 

1. The provisions of this Amendment shall be effective as of the date approved by the Company’s shareholders (i.e., May 15,
2013). 
 2. Section 4 (Stock Subject to Plan) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence and
replacing it with the following language: 
 Subject to adjustment as provided below, the total number of shares of Stock
reserved and available for issuance or which may be otherwise acquired upon exercise of Purchase Rights under the Plan will be 18,000,000. 
 3. This Amendment shall amend only the provisions of the Plan as set forth herein. 

Those provisions of the Plan not expressly amended hereby shall be considered in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ON Semiconductor Corporation has caused this Amendment to be executed as of this 20th day of February, 2013.

  

			
	ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ JUDITH A. BOYLE

		 	Judith A. Boyle
	Its:	 	Vice President, Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Secretary
#### In the Matter of Vilma Lancaster et al., Appellants, v Incorporated Village of Freeport et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of William F. Glacken et al., Appellants, v Incorporated Village of Freeport et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Submitted February 11, 2013;

decided March 21, 2013

Motion to dismiss appeal denied.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**SECTION1350 CERTIFICATION**

I, David K. Hill, thePrincipal Executive Officer of Kimball Hill, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that based on my knowledge theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006,filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission: (i) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
|   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   | /s/ DAVID K.  HILL                                   |
|   |   |   |   | David K. Hill,*Chairman and Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: August 11, 2006

1

 

----
Exhibit 10.23

 

SUBLEASE TERMINATION AGREEMENT

 

THIS SUBLEASE TERMINATION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into effective as of June 30, 2013 (the “Effective Date”), by and between ADK GEORGIA, LLC, a Georgia limited liability Company (“Sublessor”) and ADK SAVANNAH BEACH OPERATOR, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“Sublessee”).

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Lease (“Master Lease”) dated August 1, 2010, Sublessor leased from William M. Foster (“Lessor”) the premises described and defined in the Master Lease as the Property (the “Property”);

 

WHEREAS, Sublessee subleased that portion of the Property located at 26 Van Horne Street, Tybee Island, Georgia consisting of 50 licensed beds (the “Premises”) pursuant to that certain Sublease Agreement and Lessor’s Consent dated as of April 10, 2010 (the “Sublease”);and

 

WHEREAS, Sublessor and Sublessee desire to terminate the Sublease in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, promises, undertakings, and releases herein, the receipt, adequacy, and sufficiency of such consideration being expressly acknowledged, Lessor and Lessee hereby agree as follows:

 

1.             The foregoing recital of facts is hereby made a part of this Agreement to the same extent as if fully set forth herein.  All capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them above.

 

2.             The Sublease shall terminate, without further action or notice, on the Effective Date at 11:59 p.m.  Each party’s duties and obligations to the other under the Sublease shall terminate as of 11:59 p.m. on the Effective Date.

 

3.             This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted under the laws of the State of Georgia.

 

{Signatures on Following Page}

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed and sealed as of the date stated on the first page of this Agreement.

 

 

	
 
    	
SUBLESSOR:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
ADK   GEORGIA, LLC,
    
	
 
    	
a   Georgia limited liability company
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Boyd P. Gentry
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Boyd   Gentry
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
C.E.O.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
SUBLESSEE:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
ADK   SAVANNAH BEACH OPERATOR, LLC,
    
	
 
    	
a   Georgia limited liability company
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Boyd P. Gentry
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Boyd   Gentry
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
C.E.O.
    


 

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on May 22, 2009, Noramco Inc., Division of Ortho-McNeil, Inc., 500 Swedes Landing Road, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of Tapentadol (9780), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.

The company plans to bulk manufacture the above listed controlled substance for distribution to its customers.

Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such a substance, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a).

Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152; and must be filed no later than August 24, 2009.

Dated: June 15, 2009.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-14695 Filed 6-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Plaintiffsʼ Notice of Appeal

NO. 2011-18770

JOAN DEYOUNG, STEPHEN DEYOUNG, 

M.D., AND DAVID DEYOUNG,

Plaintiffs,

V.

JUDY PAGE MAYNARD, WILLIAM L. 

MAYNARD, MAYNARD PROPERTIES, 

L.P., AND BEIRNE, MAYNARD & 

PARSONS, L.L.P.,

Defendants.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

270TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

PLAINTIFFSʼ NOTICE OF APPEAL

Plaintiffs Joan DeYoung, Stephen DeYoung, M.D., and David DeYoung

(“plaintiffs”) file this notice of appeal, as follows:

1. This is an appeal from an order granting defendantsʼ motion for summary 

judgment, signed by the Court on February 17, 2015.

1

2. Plaintiffs have not filed a motion for new trial and, pursuant to Tex. R. Civ. 

P. 324 and Tex. R. App. P. 33.1, are not required to do so as a prerequisite for appeal.

3. Plaintiffs desire to appeal the order granting defendantsʼ motion for 

summary judgment to either the First or Fourteenth Court of Appeals in the State of 

Texas.

 1 While the Court has indicated that an additional judgment will be entered in this matter, this notice of appeal 

is filed in an excess of caution based on plaintiffsʼ understanding that the Court considered its February 17, 

2015 order to be a final judgment in this matter.

ACCEPTED

01-15-00260

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

3/30/2015 4:50:24 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/30/2015 4:50:24 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Plaintiffsʼ Notice of Appeal 2

Respectfully submitted,

THE JACKSON LAW FIRM

/s/ Daniel W. Jackson

Daniel W. Jackson, SBN 00796817

Scott K. Vastine, SBN 24056469

3900 Essex Lane, Suite 1116

Houston, Texas 77027

(713) 522-4435

(713) 527-8850 – fax

daniel@jacksonlaw-tx.com

scott@jacksonlaw-tx.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing document has been served on all counsel of 

record, via ProDocs, on March 19, 2015:

Gregory N. Jones

Law Office of Gregory N. Jones

2323 S. Shepherd, 14th Floor

Houston, Texas 77019

gjones@gnjlaw.net

William L. Maynard

1300 Post Oak Blvd, Suite 2500

Houston, Texas 77056

Fax: (713) 960-1527

/s/ Daniel W. Jackson

Daniel W. Jackson
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  ONLINE  ORIGINALS,  INC.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Shari
Sookarookoff,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (a) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



Date:    October 13, 2009


By:  /s/ Shari Sookarookoff
     -------------------------------
     Shari Sookarookoff
     President/Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial (Accounting) Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #15-2006 (B) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            August
      12, 2008
#### Ricky Taylor, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 888]

Order of the Court of Claims of the State of New York (Richard E. Sise, EJ.), entered April 14, 2005, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the claim and denied claimant’s cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Claimant’s failure to verify his claim in compliance with Court of Claims Act § 8-b (4) mandated dismissal *(Long v State of New York,*7 NY3d 269 [2006]). Concur—Saxe, J.E, Marlow, Nardelli, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
Exhibit 99.4



CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of HIGH END VENTURES, INC., a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Thomas Forzani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Lance R. Larsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C.  1350), that to his knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Thomas Forzani



Thomas Forzani, Chief Executive Officer



August 16, 2006





/s/ Donald Thompson



Donald Thompson, Secretary/Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer



August 16, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HIGH END VENTURES, INC. and will be retained by HIGH END VENTURES, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





1