alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------



                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William E. Saxelby, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

      i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
            in all material respects, the financial condition and result
            of operations of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



                                    /s/  William E. Saxelby
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    William E. Saxelby
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer



May 9, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LifeCare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Wayne McAlister, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 13, 2009



/s/ G. Wayne McAlisterG. Wayne McAlisterChief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Westchester County Correction Officers Benevolent Association, Inc., Respondent, v Kevin M. Cheverko et al., Appellants.

[978 NYS2d 60]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm four arbitration awards dated March 11, 2011, March 14, 2011, May 7, 2011, and May 8, 2011, determining that Michael Simmons, Alex Ciampa, Michael Mucciolo, and Allison Hoard, respectively, are entitled to benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c, Kevin M. Cheverko, as Commissioner of the Westchester County Department of Corrections, the Westchester County Department of Corrections, and Westchester County appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walker, J.), entered March 15, 2012, which granted the petition to confirm the arbitration awards dated March 11, 2011, March 14, 2011, May 7, 2011, and May 8, 2011, in favor of Michael Simmons, Alex Ciampa, Michael Mucciolo, and Allison Hoard, respectively, and denied their cross petition, inter alia, to vacate those awards.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition to confirm four arbitration awards dated March 11, 2011, March 14, 2011, May 7, 2011, and May 8, 2011, is denied, that branch of the cross petition which was to vacate those awards is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to remit the matter to the arbitrator for further proceedings consistent herewith.

An arbitration award is indefinite or nonfinal for purposes of CPLR 7511 and subject to vacatur “only if it leaves the parties unable to determine their rights and obligations, if it does not resolve the controversy submitted or if it creates a new controversy” *(Matter of Meisels v*Uhr, 79 NY2d 526, 536 [1992]; *see Matter of Board of Educ. of Amityville Union Free School Dist. v Amityville Teacher’s Assn.,*62 AD3d 992, 993 [2009]). Here, Corrections Officers Michael Simmons, Alex Ciampa, Michael Mucciolo, and Allison Hoard sought benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c. General Municipal Law “[s]ection 207-c provides benefits to officers who are disabled ‘in the performance of or ‘as a result of their job duties” *(Matter of White v County of Cortland,*97 NY2d 336, 339 [2002]). The arbitration awards awarding them benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c were indefinite or nonfinal for purposes of CPLR 7511 and must be vacated, since those awards did not address whether each officer sustained a disability. Accordingly, we reverse the order, deny the petition to confirm the four *843subject arbitration awards, grant that branch of the cross petition which was to vacate those awards, and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to remit the matter to the arbitrator for further proceedings and a determination as to whether each officer sustained a disability. Mastro, J.E, Skelos, Balkin and Roman, JJ., concur.
BOSTON FINANCIAL QUALIFIED HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP




                                 EXHIBIT [32.1]


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Financial Qualified Housing
Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, the Executive Vice President, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Partnership.



                                                       /s/Jenny Netzer
                                                       ----------------------
                                                       Jenny Netzer
                                                       Executive Vice President
                                                       MMA Financial, LLC, LLC

                                                       Date:  June 30, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23(b)

 

 

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendments No. 3 and 5A on Form S-8 and their related prospectuses to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 33-54298) of Entergy Corporation, Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-02503 and 333-22007) of Entergy Corporation and Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-98179, 333-90914, 333-75097, 333-55692, and 333-68950) of Entergy Corporation of our report dated March 1, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Entergy-Koch, LP included in Exhibit 99(a) in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Entergy Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

                                                                                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Houston, Texas March 8, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------



                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William E. Saxelby, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



August 6, 2009

                                    /s/ William E. Saxelby
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    William E. Saxelby
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer
#### Irene Gottesman et al., Respondents, v Evelyn Friedman, Also Known as Eveline Friedman, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted April 30, 2012;

decided June 12, 2012

*898Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 29, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00445

- CR

Jeremiah HINDMAN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

From the 226th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR11660B

Honorable Sid L. Harle , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the c ourt’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on July 29, 2015

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of July, 2015

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
December 15, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, Appellant

NO. 14-10-01040-CV V.

GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the order in favor of appellee, GREAT AMERICAN 

INSURANCE COMPANY, signed October 1, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the 

record. For the reasons stated in this court’s opinion, we reverse the trial court’s order 

denying appellant HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT’s second plea to 

the jurisdiction to the extent that the trial court refused to dismiss (1) appellee’s 

equitable-subrogation claim in which it seeks recovery beyond what appellant owes 

under the Handex Contract, as that term is defined in this court’s opinion, and (2) 

appellee’s waste claim based upon appellant’s allegedly negligent or wrongful conduct. 

We remand to the trial court with instructions to dismiss these two claims for lack of 

subject-matter jurisdiction. We affirm the remainder of the trial court’s order. For good 

cause, we order both appellant and appellee to pay one-half of all costs incurred in this 

appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mikal Smith, Appellant.

Submitted January 7, 2013;

decided March 26, 2013

Motion to strike appellant’s appendix denied without prejudice to the serving and filing of a supplemental appendix by respondent on or before May 10, 2013.
#### In the Matter of Diamond Lee P., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Paula C., Also Known as Paula T., Appellant; Cardinal McCloskey Services, Respondent.

Submitted November 26, 2012;

decided January 15, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
# 2024 NINDS Nonprofit Forum

Register Now

----

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) invites members of nonprofit organizations to an annual Nonprofit Forum. The Progress through Partnership Forum provides an opportunity for nonprofit leaders to network with colleagues and to engage in discussions with NINDS staff.

The 2024 NINDS Nonprofit forum will take place July 23-24 virtually and in person at the Neuroscience Center Building in Rockville MD.   We expect to open the meeting registration and soon so check back for details regarding this hybrid event.  This is a public event, so please feel free to share the news with your networks.  

If you have any questions, please reach out to Andrea Varea.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-36380, 333-59601, 33-57658,
333-56572, 333-24705, and 33-49801 and 33-59545, 333-45051, 333-46980, and 33-
56084, respectively) of Constellation Energy Group, Inc. of our report dated
January 17, 2001 relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

                                        /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                        __________________________
                                        PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

   Baltimore, Maryland
   March 30, 2001

                                       97
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



--------------------------------------------------------------------



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Equine Alliance Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Demitro Marianovich, Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Registrant         |  | Royal Equine Alliance Corporation                                                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |                                                                                                        
|Date:  May 1, 2009 |  | By:  /s/ Demitro Marianovich                                                                           
|                   |  |                                                                                                        
|                   |  | Demitro Marianovich
Chief Executive Officer 
(Principle Executive Officer, Principle Financial Officer)



23



|
|
#### In the Matter of Debra A. Ramallo, Appellant, v New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.

Submitted May 13, 2013;

decided June 26, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
H. Res. 31 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 9, 2019. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON ETHICS: Mr. Deutch, Chair. 

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Ms. Lofgren, 

Chair. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### Akron Bar Association *v.*Snyder.

[Cite as *Akron Bar Assn. v. Snyder*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 57.]

(No. 96-2428

Submitted December 11, 1996

Decided March 26, 1997.)

*59
      *John C. Weisensell, Michael C. Scanlon*and *Michael L. Stark,*for relator.

*Scott W. Snyder, pro se.*

*Per Curiam.*

We approve the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation of the board. From a review of the record we can understand the factors which caused respondent to neglect his professional duty to his clients. Nevertheless, we have a constitutional duty to oversee the conduct of the legal profession in' Ohio, and we cannot condone respondent’s failures to meet his responsibilities. An attorney’s failure to carry out a legal matter entrusted to him and failure to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation have warranted suspension from the practice of law. *Disciplinary Counsel v. Leibold*(1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 128, 559 N.E.2d 749. In a previous case where we found that rehabilitation was as much or more appropriate than discipline, we imposed a sanction of indefinite suspension. *Disciplinary Counsel v. Trumbo*(1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 369, 667 N.E.2d 1186. We believe the same sanction is appropriate here. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
### In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

_________________________ No. 06

- 11

- 00248

- CR

______________________________

MICHAEL MANDEL CHRISTIAN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th Judicial District Court

Lamar County, Texas Trial Court No. 23277

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Michael Mandel Christian argues

— on appeal from a judgment adjudicating his guilt for aggravated assault and sentencing him to fifteen years’ imprisonment

— that his trial counsel was

ineffective be cause he recommended that Christian plead guilty in the underlying action from which he was placed on deferred adjudication. Because ineffective assistance of counsel during the original proceeding cannot now be raised on appeal from Christian’s adjudicat ion of guilt, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

A defendant placed on deferred adjudication community supervision may raise issues relating t o the original plea proceeding only in appeals taken when deferred adjudication is first imposed. Manuel v. S tate , 994 S.W.2d 658 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). 1 Christian’s argument is therefore not cognizable in this appeal from the final adjudication of guilt. Even if it were reviewable, Christian runs headlong into the rigorous requirements of establishing ineffective assistance of counsel

. He would be required to prove by a preponderance of the evidence (1) that his counsel ’ s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) that the deficient performance prejudiced his defense.

St rickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 689 (1984); Rosales v. State , 4 S.W.3d 228, 231 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). To meet this burden, Christian would be required to prove that the attorney ’ s representation fell below the standard of prevailing professional n orms and that there is a reasonable probability that, but for the attorney ’ s deficiency, the result of the trial would have

1 An exception exists in the case of a void judgment, but there is no suggestion that this exception could apply to this
case. See Nix v. State , 65 S.W.3d 664, 667 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).3

been different. Ex parte Martinez , 195 S.W.3d 713, 730 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Tong v. State , 25 S.W.3d 70 7, 712 (Tex. Crim. App. 2 000). Where an appellate record is silent as to why trial counsel failed to take certain actions, the appellant has failed to rebut the presumption that trial counsel ’ s decision was in some way

reasonable. See Mata v. State , 226 S.W.3d 425, 431 (Tex. Cri m. App. 2007). In this case, there is no record at any level to indicate why counsel chose to take or declined to take any of these

actions

. We affirm the judgment.

Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice

Date Submitted: September 4 , 2012 Date Decided: September 7 , 2012

Do Not Publish
5

FY13-FY17 Gaming Revenues by Range

Number of Revenues Percentage of Mean Median

Gaming Revenue Range Submissions (in thousands) Submissions Revenues (in thousands) (in thousands)

Submissions with fiscal years ending in 2017

$250 million and over 33 15,016,924 6.7% 46.3% $455,058 $363,086

$100 million to $250 million 56 9,058,782 11.3% 28.0% $161,764 $164,374

$50 million to $100 million 54 3,767,470 10.9% 11.6% $69,768 $69,893

$25 million to $50 million 68 2,382,602 13.8% 7.4% $35,038 $32,287

$10 million to $25 million 91 1,494,558 18.4% 4.6% $16,424 $15,749

$3 million to $10 million 89 575,005 18.0% 1.8% $6,461 $6,754

Under $3 million 103 108,586 20.9% 0.3% $1,054 $883

Total 494 32,403,927

Submissions with fiscal years ending in 2016

$250 million and over 33 14,429,248 6.8% 46.3% $437,250 $363,632

$100 million to $250 million 51 8,286,641 10.5% 26.6% $162,483 $166,810

$50 million to $100 million 57 4,011,478 11.8% 12.9% $70,377 $67,928

$25 million to $50 million 67 2,290,169 13.8% 7.3% $34,182 $32,673

$10 million to $25 million 96 1,561,863 19.8% 5.0% $16,269 $15,825

$3 million to $10 million 85 521,096 17.6% 1.7% $6,131 $6,420

Under $3 million 95 95,055 19.6% 0.3% $1,001 $723

Total 484 31,195,549

Submissions with fiscal years ending in 2015

$250 million and over 31 13,438,296 6.5% 45.0% $433,493 $364,412

$100 million to $250 million 48 7,912,634 10.1% 26.5% $164,847 $171,114

$50 million to $100 million 54 3,880,101 11.4% 13.0% $71,854 $69,112

$25 million to $50 million 69 2,466,214 14.6% 8.3% $35,742 $33,948

$10 million to $25 million 98 1,590,194 20.7% 5.3% $16,226 $15,676

$3 million to $10 million 79 495,275 16.7% 1.7% $6,269 $6,434

Under $3 million 95 99,031 20.0% 0.3% $1,042 $771

Total 474 $29,881,744

Submissions with fiscal years ending in 2014

$250 million and over 26 $11,476,930 5.7% 40.3% $441,420 $352,632

$100 million to $250 million 53 $8,879,425 11.5% 31.2% $167,536 $166,669

$50 million to $100 million 50 $3,497,403 10.9% 12.3% $69,948 $66,707

$25 million to $50 million 70 $2,495,929 15.3% 8.8% $35,656 $32,415

$10 million to $25 million 96 $1,533,912 20.9% 5.4% $15,978 $15,605

$3 million to $10 million 76 $479,275 16.6% 1.7% $6,306 $6,425

Under $3 million 88 $96,437 19.2% 0.3% $1,096 $888

Total 459 $28,459,310

Submissions with fiscal years ending in 2013

$250 million and over 26 $11,339,225 5.8% 40.5% $436,124 $374,214

$100 million to $250 million 52 $8,581,295 11.6% 30.6% $165,025 $163,382

$50 million to $100 million 51 $3,633,364 11.4% 13.0% $71,242 $69,459

$25 million to $50 million 68 $2,416,657 15.1% 8.6% $35,539 $33,501

$10 million to $25 million 95 $1,511,162 21.2% 5.4% $15,907 $15,605

$3 million to $10 million 79 $462,919 17.6% 1.7% $5,860 $5,368

Under $3 million 78 $86,974 17.4% 0.3% $1,115 $847

Total 449 $28,031,595

Source: Compiled from gaming operation audit reports received and entered by the NIGC through 6/26/2018.

NIGC Tribal Gaming Revenues