alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas G. Seifert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of GlobalNet Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

April 16, 2004

                               /s/  Thomas G. Seifert
                                    -----------------
                                    Thomas G. Seifert
                                    Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Orient Paper, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Winston C. Yen, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.

|                   |     |                                               
|------------------ | --- | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2009 | By: | /s/ Winston C. Yen                            
|                   |     |                                               
|                   |     | Winston C.
  Yen                              
|                   |     | Chief
  Financial Officer                     
|                   |     | (principal
  financial and accounting officer)

15

---
Exhibit 4.3




 





Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated July 30, 2013, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-188667) of Smart Trust, Adelante
REIT Growth & Income Trust, Series 2.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


July 30, 2013
Argentex Mining Corporation - Exhibit 4.14 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Vancouver B.C, 2 July, 2013 

AUSTRAL GOLD ARGENTINA S.A. 
Attn: Mr.
Chairman

c.c.: AUSTRAL GOLD LTD 
Attn: Secretary and CFO 

Ref: Acceptance
Letter

Dear Sirs, 

 

We hereby irrevocably accept your Subscription Offer dated July
2, 2013. 

Sincerely, 

 

ARGENTEX MINING CORPORATION 

 

	Per: 	/s/Mike Brown 	 
	  	Authorized Signatory
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brekford International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tin M. Khin, Principal Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



| |  |                                                              
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Tin M. Khin                                              
| |  | Tin M. Khin
Principal Financial Officer

Date: August 3, 2009



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Manuel Occiano, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of RevCare, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant andhave:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisannual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluationas of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes ininternal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.

 

Date: December 29, 2004
|   |
|--------|
|   |
|   | /S/: Manuel Occiano |   |
|   |  Manuel  Occiano |
|   |  Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32(d)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Theodore H. Bunting, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.









|/s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
(acting principal financial officer)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	February 27, 2009
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 CECILE FOY GSANGER

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

July 14, 2015

Hon. Stephen B. Tyler

District Attorney

205 N. Bridge St., Suite 301

Victoria, TX 77901

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Daniel Gilliam

County Court at Law No. 2

115 N. Bridge, Room 127

Victoria, TX 77901

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Brendan W. Guy

Assistant District Attorney

205 N. Bridge Street, Ste 301

Victoria, TX 77901

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Patti Hutson

Attorney at Law

110 E. Constitution

Victoria, TX 77901

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-15-00317-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 2-103177

Style: In Re The State of Texas ex. rel. Stephen B. Tyler

Enclosed please find a copy of an order issued by this Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Cecile Foy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. Heidi Easley (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
#### MINNEAPOLIS GASOLINE *&*FUEL CO. v. ETHYL GASOLINE CORPORATION et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 13, 1941.

See, also, D.C., 38 F.Supp. 454.

Louis Karasik, of New York City, Hiram Z. Mendow, of Minneapolis, Minn., and Maurice J. Dix, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Richard M. Page and Benjamin C. Loder, both of New York City, for defendants.

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

This is a motion to strike certain allegations from the complaint under the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The courts are reluctant to strike matter from a complaint unless it has no relation to the controversy in any way, and a failure to strike such matter will unduly prejudice the adverse party. Raymond Brothers Motor Transportation Co., Inc., v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, Inc., et al., D.C., W.D. Wis., decided January 7, 19411; Huber Inc., v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co., D.C., 30 F.Supp. 108; Samuel Goldwyn, Inc., v. United Artists, Corporation, D.C., 35 F. Supp. 633; Kraus v. General Motors Corp., D.C., 27 F.Supp. 537; Westmoreland Asbestos Co., Inc., v. Johns-Manville Corporation, D.C., 30 F.Supp. 389.

Paragraphs 20 to 29 recite the various steps in the suit brought by the United States Government. Defendants contend that these allegations may be read to the jury to the prejudice of defendants. This problem of the admissibility of those allegations, together with the admissibility in evidence of the government decree in the proceeding, can be had at the pre-trial conference. In any event, the defendants may take appropriate steps before the trial judge to prevent the plaintiff’s reading these allegations to a jury if such procedure should then appear improper.

Paragraphs 2, 3, 3a, 30 to 33 deal with the question of venue and will not be stricken. Hansen Packing Co. v. Armour & Co., D.C., 16 F.Supp. 784, 787.

*308The portions of paragraphs 13, 15 and 18 objected to deal with the controversy herein and their presence do not prejudice defendants.

From a reading of the complaint, the use of the word “defendants” in paragraphs 39 and 40 means defendants in the plural sense.

The motion is denied. Settle order.

1

 No opinion for publication.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P (the
      “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Randall H. Breitenbach, Co-Chief Executive Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLC,
      the
      general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





/s/
                RANDALL H. BREITENBACHRandall
                H. Breitenbach*Co-Chief
                Executive Officer of BreitBurn GP,
                LLC*




Dated:
      November 10, 2008
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO 
 THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION 

EXECUTIVE SEPARATION ALLOWANCE PLAN 
 (2006 AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT) 
 WHEREAS, The Progressive
Corporation Executive Separation Allowance Plan (“Plan”) is currently maintained pursuant to the 2006 Amendment and Restatement and three amendments thereto; and 
 WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to amend the Plan further; 
 NOW, THEREFORE,
effective January 1, 2013, the Plan is hereby amended as set forth below: 
  

	 	1.	Section 3.5 of the Plan is amended and restated hereby in its entirety to provide as follows: 


“3.5 Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no separation allowance payments shall be made under this Plan to any Eligible
Employee later than two and one-half months following the end of the year in which the Eligible Employee’s Separation Date occurs.” 
  

	 	2.	Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain entirely unchanged and continue in full force and effect.


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has hereunto caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized
representative as of the 1st day of January, 2013. 
  

			
	The Progressive Corporation
		
	By:	 	/s/ Charles E. Jarrett
	Title:	 	Vice President
#### John Mescall et al., Respondents, v Structure-Tone, Inc., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[852 NYS2d 763]

Plaintiff, an ironworker, was injured when a crane that was lifting a 25-by-25-foot steel “screen” or “curtain” failed, causing the screen to fall some 20 feet in the air before striking plaintiff. Although defendant asserts that it instructed plaintiff to use steel “cradles” to prepare the screens for hoisting, plaintiff and the coworker attested that no such cradles were available on the date of the accident, and defendant adduces no evidence to the contrary. Thus, defendant cannot argue that plaintiff was a recalcitrant worker, or that his actions were the sole proximate cause of the accident *(see Rivera v Ambassador Fuel & Oil Burner Corp.,*45 AD3d 275, 276 [2007]; *Ramos v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.,*306 AD2d 147 [2003]). We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Williams and McGuire, JJ.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 16, 2015

NO. 03-14-00192-CR

Christopher Lawrence, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. 

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proper Power and Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph E. Abdo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my knowledge that:  (i)  the accompanying Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act); and  (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  PROPER POWER AND ENERGY, INC.  /s/:  Joseph E. Abdo JOSEPH E. ABDO, Chief Executive Officer   November 15, 2010
#### City of New York, Respondent-Appellant, v Welsbach Electric Corp., Defendant, and Insurance Company of North America, Appellant-Respondent.

[852 NYS2d 134]

Because defendant Welsbach Electric Corp., the named insured under the policy issued by Century, and the City, an additional insured under the policy, were adverse parties in the underlying action, the City had an independent obligation to provide timely written notice of the claim to Century *(see Travelers Ins. Co. v Volmar Constr. Co.,*300 AD2d 40, 44 [2002]). Further discovery as to whether Welsbach provided timely notice would serve no purpose *(see American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v CMA Enters.,*246 AD2d 373 [1998]).

Since Century asserted its late notice defense 92 days after receiving the City’s summons and complaint, its disclaimer cannot be held to be timely as a matter of law *(see*CPLR 3012 [c]; Insurance Law § 1212 [b]). While the City waived any defense based on lack of personal jurisdiction in the parties’ agreement *323extending Century’s time to answer, it did not waive its right to assert an untimely disclaimer defense *(cf. DiGuglielmo v Travelers Prop. Cas.,*6 AD3d 344, 346 [2004], *lv denied 3*NY3d 608 [2004]).

Nor can Century’s notice of disclaimer be held to be untimely as a matter of law, since Century asserts that it needed time to investigate the 10-year-old claim. However, an issue of fact exists whether Century conducted its investigation promptly, diligently and in good faith *(see Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v Gray,*49 AD3d 1, 7 [2007]; *cf. 2540 Assoc. v Assicurazioni Generali,*271 AD2d 282, 284 [2000]). Contrary to Century’s contention, discovery as to its investigation would not violate the attorney-client and protected work-product privileges *(see Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v American Home Assur. Co.,*23 AD3d 190, 191 [2005]).

Contrary to Century’s further contention, Insurance Law § 3420 (d) protects the insured from the insurer’s unreasonable delays in disclaiming coverage even where, as here, the underlying claim has been satisfied *(see e.g. 474431 Assoc. v AXA Global Risks US Ins. Co.,*18 AD3d 604, 605 [2005]).

In light of our determination, we do not address Century’s remaining contentions. Concur—Tom, J.P., Buckley, Sweeny and Moskowitz, JJ. [See 11 Misc 3d 1085(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 50705(U).]
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

5 Star Forestry, LLC 

Under Contract No. W912EF-12-P-5091 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59591 

Michael S. Bissell, Esq. 

Tyler S. Waite, Esq. 

Campbell & Bissell, PLLC 

Spokane, WA 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

J. Tyler Moore, Esq. 

Deputy District Counsel 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Walla Walla 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 14 July 2015 

Administrativ Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59591, Appeal of 5 Star Forestry, 

LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals