alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3354 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges Complex as the Sam D. Hamilton North Mississippi 

National Wildlife Refuges Complex. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3354 ES

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE NORTH MISSISSIPPI 

2 NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES COMPLEX. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The North Mississippi National 

4 Wildlife Refuges Complex, located in the State of Mis5 sissippi and consisting of the Dahomey National Wildlife 

6 Refuge, the Tallahatchie National Wildlife Refuge, the 

7 Coldwater National Wildlife Refuge, and the Bear Lake 

8 Unit, is redesignated as the ‘‘Sam D. Hamilton North 

9 Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges Complex.’’ 

10 (b) BOUNDARY REVISION.—Nothing in this Act pre11 vents the Secretary of the Interior from making adjust12 ments to the boundaries of the Sam D. Hamilton North 

13 Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges Complex (referred 

14 to in this section as the ‘‘Refuges Complex’’), as the Sec15 retary determines to be appropriate, to carry out the mis16 sion of the National Wildlife Refuge System in accordance 

17 with the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration 

18 Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.) and any other ap19 plicable authority. 

20 (c) ADDITION OF LAND.—Nothing in this Act pre21 vents the Secretary of the Interior from adding to the Ref22 uges Complex new land or parcels of the National Wildlife 

23 Refuge System, as the Secretary determines to be appro24 priate, to carry out the mission of the National Wildlife 

25 Refuge System in accordance with the National Wildlife 
3 

†S 3354 ES

1 Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 

2 668dd et seq.) and any other applicable authority. 

3 (d) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any statute, 

4 rule, regulation, executive order, publication, map, paper, 

5 or other document of the United States to the North Mis6 sissippi National Wildlife Refuges Complex is deemed to 

7 refer to the Sam D. Hamilton North Mississippi National 

8 Wildlife Refuges Complex. 

Passed the Senate August 5, 2010. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3354 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the North Mississippi National 

Complex. ilton North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges Wildlife Refuges Complex as the Sam D. Ham-
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



| | CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report (the Report) on the Form 10-QSB of China Tel Group Inc. (the Company) for the nine months ended March 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael Laidlaw, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: May 20, 2008

/s/ Michael Laidlaw Michael Laidlaw

Chief Executive Officer, President, principal executive officer and Member of the Board of Directors

---
No. 5015.

(Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.)

#### SUCCESSION OF MRS. CHAS. PETIT vs. JOHN T. HUBER.

Frank McGfloin for plaintiff and appellant.

Pierson, "Walton & Pierson for defendant and appellee.

ST. PAUL, J.

This is an action brought by an administratrix on an instrument which had been mislaid, lost, stolen or destroyed before her appointment and about which apparently she herself knows nothing, not having offered to testify at the trial.

To her petition she annexed interrogatories to be propounded to defendant. These he answered admitting the execution of the instrument, but declaring that it had been “paid and settled and the instrument destroyed by the deceased, prior to her death.”

At the same time as he filed his sworn answers to the interrogatories he also filed his answer to the suit, which was the general issue.

The first question, therefore, which arises is whether, under the pleadings, defendant may be permitted to prove "that the note was paid and settled.

Under the general issue alone defendant would not be permitted to do so. But the propounding of interrogatories to a defendant is in effect a demand that the defense to the suit be made in whole or in part under oath, and the law expressly allows the defendant to set up defenses in that form.

Code of Practice, Art. 353.

We are, therefore, of opinion that defendant was en*443titled to show that his obligation had been extinguished; and he was not limited to proof of payment alone, but might show payment in part and compensation of the balance of the debt.

May 30, 1910.

As to the proof of such payment and settlement, we think that defendant has made all the proof required or possible under the circumstances of the case.

The District Judge, who saw and heard the witnesses, declared in his written reasons for judgment that he believed the defendant and his witnesses, and found that defendant had paid the deceased in cash and in merchandise all that he owed her, and that the deceased herself had acknowledged this to be true and had herself destroyed the evidence of defendant’s debt some little time before her death.

In these conclusions of the District Judge we fully concur.

Judgment affirmed.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40690

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDITH LUNA-MUNIZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:09-CR-147-1

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edith Luna-Muniz appeals from her conviction of transporting an

undocumented alien. She challenges the condition of her supervised release

requiring her to participate in a mental health program.

At Luna-Muniz’s sentencing hearing, the district court stated that she

would be subject to the “[s]tandard terms and conditions of supervision, along

with drug treatment, mental health counseling, parenting program, nighttime

restriction of 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.” The written judgment, however, orders her

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 24, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 09-40690 Document: 00511034852 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2010
No. 09-40690

2

to “participate in a mental health program as deemed necessary and approved

by the probation officer.”

In United States v. Lopez-Muxtay, No. 08-41179, 2009 WL 3016263, *1 (5th

Cir. Sept. 22, 2009) (unpublished), we vacated and remanded a sentence in

which the written judgment contained language identical to the language used

in Luna-Muniz’s case and in which the district court’s oral judgment was similar

to Luna-Muniz’s. Id. We remanded that case for clarification because “[t]he

district court’s written judgment is unclear regarding whether the district court

intended to grant Lopez’s probation officer the authority not only to implement

the condition but to determine whether Lopez should or should not undergo

mental health treatment on supervised release.” Id; see also United States v.

Bigelow, 462 F.3d 378, 381 (5th Cir. 2006) (holding that when the sentence

imposed orally by the district court conflicts with the written judgment, the oral

pronouncement controls). We now vacate the judgment in Luna-Muniz’s case

and remand the case for resentencing so that the district court may clarify the

condition of supervised release at issue. We express no opinion on the proper

resolution of the issue.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Case: 09-40690 Document: 00511034852 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2010
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jerry M. Kennelly, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Riverbed Technology, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Riverbed Technology, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Jerry M. Kennelly                
|                     |  |  |  | Jerry M. Kennelly                    
|                     |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        

I, Randy S.
Gottfried, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Riverbed Technology, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Riverbed Technology, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Randy S. Gottfried                      
|                     |  |  |  | Randy S. Gottfried                          
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                     |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been
provided to Riverbed Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Riverbed Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates,
is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                    
                   OF
                    
 HARBOR AMERICAN HEALTH CARE TRUST, INC.
                    
                    
     Harbor American Health Care Trust,

Inc., a Maryland corporation (the

"Corporation") having its principal

office in Baltimore City, Baltimore,

Maryland, hereby certifies to the State

Department of Assessments and Taxation of

Maryland, that:



     FIRST:    The charter of the

Corporation is hereby amended by striking

out Article II of the Articles of

Incorporation, as heretofore amended and

restated, and inserting in lieu thereof

the following:

               ARTICLE II

The name of the Corporation is HEALTHCARE

               INVESTORS OF AMERICA, INC.



     SECOND:   The board of directors of

the Corporation on October 25, 1996, duly

adopted a resolution in which was set

forth the foregoing amendment to the

charter, declaring that said amendment of

the charter as proposed was advisable and

directing that it be submitted for action

thereon by the stockholders of the

Corporation at an annual meeting to be

held on December 18, 1996.



     THIRD:    Notice setting forth a

summary of the changes to be effected by

said amendment of the charter and stating

a purpose of the meeting of the

stockholders would be to take action

thereon, was given, as required by law,

to all stockholders entitled to vote

thereon.  The amendment of the charter of

the Corporation has herinabove set forth

was approved by the stockholders of the

Corporation at said meeting by the

affirmative vote of two-thirds of all the

votes entitled to be cast thereon.



     FOURTH:   The amendment of the

charter of the Corporation hereinabove

set forth has been duly advised by the

board of directors and approved by the

stockholders of the Corporation.



     FIFTH:    The articles of amendment

shall become effective upon the filing of

these articles of amendment.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Harbor American

Health Care Trust, Inc. has caused these

presents to be signed in its name and on

its behalf by its President and witnessed

by its Secretary on the 18 day of

December, 1996.



                    HARBOR AMERICAN
HEALTH                        CARE TRUST,
INC.


                    By: /s/      Thomas
M. Clarke
                          President


Witness:


/s/     Linda M. Clarke
     Secretary



























     THE UNDERSIGNED, President of Harbor
American Health Care Trust, Inc., who
executed on behalf of said Corporation
the foregoing Articles of Amendment, of
which this certificate is made a part,
hereby acknowledges, in the name and on
behalf of said Corporation, the foregoing
Articles of Amendment to be the corporate
act of said Corporation and further
certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge, information and belief, the
matters and facts set forth therein with
respect to the approval thereof are true
in all material respects, under the
penalties of perjury.


                         /s/   Thomas M.
Clarke
                         President
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of

INDEPENDENT BANCSHARES, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Independent BancShares, Inc., hereby certifies that:

1. Independent BancShares, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Independent BancShares, Inc.

/S/ Mark A. Imes
Mark A. Imes
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 3, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 329 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 329

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                           May 1, 2019.
    Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 9) to direct the President to develop a plan for the United States to 
meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement, and for 
other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 90 minutes, with 60 minutes 
equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs and 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by 
the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. 
After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-
minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions in the bill are waived. No amendment to the bill shall be in order 
except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the 
report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be 
considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be 
subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the 
question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 
against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the 
bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 23.3****CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-50132 and 333-75014) pertaining tothe 1998 Incentive Compensation Plan of BKF Capital Group, Inc. ofour reports dated: January 17, 2006 — FairmountCapital Partners, L.P. as of December 31, 2005 and for theperiod from April 1, 2005 (commencement of operations) toDecember 31, 2005, January 17, 2006 — IslandDrive Partners II L.P., as of December 31, 2005,January 20, 2006 — LR Capital Partners, L.P., as ofDecember 31, 2005 and for the period from June 1, 2005(commencement of operations) to December 31, 2005,January 20, 2006 (with respect to Note F February 9, 2006and February 28, 2006) — Levco Debt OpportunityPartners, L.P. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005,January 20, 2006 (with respect to Note A February 17,2006) — Alvarado Capital Partners, L.P., as of and for the yearended December 31, 2005, included in the Form 10-K of BKFCapital Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission.EisnerLLPNew York,New YorkFebruary 13, 2007
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO THE 
 AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. 

RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (the “Company”) is the Plan Sponsor of the Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Plan Section 7.01 the Plan may be amended at anytime; and 

WHEREAS, effective May 31, 2013, the Company will purchase the outstanding stock of EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc. and in
connection with such stock acquisition will hire certain employees of EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc.; and 
 WHEREAS,
the former employees of EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc. who are hired by the Company in connection with the stock acquisition will not participate in the Plan until 30 days after the purchase of the outstanding stock of EPCO Carbon Dioxide
Products, Inc.; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to reflect that employees of EPCO Carbon Dioxide
Products, Inc. hired in connection with the purchase of the outstanding stock of EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc. shall not be eligible to become Core Contribution Participants until July 1, 2013. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Section 2.15 shall be amended to read as follows: 

 “2.15 Core Contribution Participant shall mean an Electing Employee or a salaried Employee whose Employment Commencement Date or Reemployment Commencement Date occurs after
October 21, 2004, or who otherwise becomes a salaried Employee after such date, a non-union hourly Employee whose Employment Commencement Date or Reemployment Commencement date occurs after February 1, 2011, or an employee who otherwise
becomes a non-union hourly Employee after February 1, 2011 provided such employee is not accruing benefits in the Hourly Pension Plan. With respect to Employees who were employed by EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc. on May 31, 2013 and
who were hired by the Company on June 1, 2013, such Employees shall become a Core Contribution Participant effective July 1, 2013.” 
  

	 	2.	In all other respects the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer to execute this Seventh Amendment to the Plan on this
             day of May 2013. 
  

			
	AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
		 	Chief Administrative Officer
Document

Exhibit 10.3

                


To:         Alan King


From:          Ron Clarke


Date:         May 23, 2022


Subject:     Your Compensation 




			
	




Alan, we’re pleased to provide you with a review of your 2022 Compensation. 


1.Performance-Based Stock Option Grant.  In October 2021, the Compensation Committee provided you with a one-time, outsized grant of 30,000 performance-based stock options. This grant could allow you to make an incremental $5M.  You and I will work together to determine the 3-year performance criteria.  The options will be dependent on you achieving the criteria we establish and you must be employed at the time of vest.  Vesting is 3-year cliff and based on 2022, 2023 and 2024 performance.


2.2022 Go-Forward Compensation:  Your 2022 Compensation will be as follows.


a.2022 Cash.  Your cash compensation for 2022 will be:  


i.Base Salary:  Your 2022 base salary will increase to $450,000 USD annualized.  


ii.Bonus:  Your 2022 bonus target will remain at 75% of your base salary or $337,500.  We will formalize your 2022 PBOs over the next month.


iii.EPS Grant:  For 2022, you have been awarded 1,486 restricted shares ($335,000 in grant date value).  These shares will vest one year from the date of grant, if we achieve a specific 2022 Cash EPS Target (macro-adjusted and as revised for the pro-forma impact of acquisitions).  We will formalize the target over the next few weeks.


b.2022 New Equity Grants.  The Compensation Committee approved an increase in your annual performance-based restricted stock grant and your annual stock option grant.  You have been awarded three new equity grants as follows:


i.Performance-Based Restricted Stock: You were granted 5,323 new performance-based restricted shares ($1,200,000 in GDV) which have a one-year performance period and a three-year vest, upon achievement of a specific 2022 macro-adjusted net revenue.  We will work together to formalize the target over the next few weeks.  Assuming performance, your shares will vest in equal increments in early 2023, 2024 and 2025 (assuming continued employment).  If you do not achieve the target, all shares will be forfeited. 


ii.Stock Option Grant:  You were also granted 18,352 new stock options with an exercise price of $225.45 ($1,200,000 in GDV). These shares will time vest evenly over 4 years.  You must be employed in order for the shares to vest. 


iii.Retention Stock Option Grant.  We recognize the stock price has been challenged over the last several years and that you forfeited compensation in 2020, therefore, the Compensation Committee agreed to grant you an additional 18,352 new stock options with an exercise price of $225.45 ($1,200,000 in GDV).  This is a one-time grant.  These shares will time vest evenly over 4 years.  You must be employed in order for the shares to vest. 


1