UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 6422

RICKY BUTLER
,

Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
SUPERINTENDENT EDWARD HULL, a/k/a Superintendent Ted Hull; NURSE HRYN; ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT PHYLLIS BACK, a/k/a Deputy Superintendent Back, a/k/a Major Back; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAW, JR.; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAW, SR.; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BUNTIN; COR RECTIONAL OFFICER WILLIAMS; NURSE VAUGHAN; SERGEANT TYLER TAYLOR, a/k/a Sergeant Taylor; CHIEF OF SECURITY DARYL TURNER, a/k/a Captain Daryl Turner, a/k/a Captain Turner; DR. JAMES DUDLEY, Medical Director at Northern Neck Regional Jail and Physician at Ri verside Tappahannock Hospital; LIEUTENANT J. NEWSOME, a/k/a Lieutenant Newsome; LIEUTENANT ELEAZAR LUNA, a/k/a Lieutenant Luna; AMY DAMERON, a/k/a Medical Director Amy Dameron, Inmate Services Director; JAMES BARNES, a/k/a EMT Barnes, Emergency Medical Tec hnician/Assistant Medical Director; EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN JETER, a/k/a EMT Jeter; EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN SHELTON, a/k/a EMT Shelton; KEITH JOHNSON, a/k/a Counselor Johnson, Mental Health Counselor; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HARRIS; OFFICER IAN HO UCHIN, a/k/a Correctional Officer Houchin; OFFICER ANTHONY T. GRAY, a/k/a Correctional Officer Gray; SERGEANT ENGLISH; OFFICER ALEX WILLIAMS; OFFICER DORIAN GARNER; OFFICER CHASITY JONES, a/k/a Chasity Taylor; OFFICER DIVINE VENEY; OFFICER ASHLEY VENEY; OF FICER BERNARD NELSON; LIEUTENANT BURRELL; OFFICER JOHNTIEUS BALL; OFFICER R. RAY; OFFICER R. WALKER; OFFICER C. THOMAS; OFFICER SMITH; OFFICER GIBSON; OFFICER JOHNATHAN DAVIS; OFFICER MALCOLM PARKER; OFFICER WESTON SHROPSHIRE; OFFICER BRYAN TINDER; OFFICER SIGIFREDO A. LUNA; OFFICER E. FREDERICK; OFFICER E. HALL; OFFICER DANIEL BROWN; OFFICER ESAW LEE; OFFICER J. VIARS; OFFICER RICHARD ROSE; OFFICER ANTHONY DARBY; OFFICER CONNOR JERNIGAN; OFFICER MELINDA BEST; OFFICER J. DEGAETANI;2 SERGEANT W. CHATHAM; SERG EANT M. MOORE; SERGEANT R. KNIGHT; SERGEANT SAMUEL BRINKLEY; LIEUTENANT CURTIS BURTON; DR. JEFFREY M. HASKINS, Urologist at Riverside Tappahannock Hospital; RIVERSIDE TAPPAHANNOCK HOSPITAL; RIVERSIDE HEALTH SYSTEM, as parent company at Riverside Tappahanno ck Hospital; DR. EMMETH A. DANIEL, Riverside Tappahannock Hospital Doctor
,

Defendants

- Appellees
,

and

NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL; NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL BOARD
,

Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv

- 01525

- TSE

- JFA )

Submitted : June 24, 2021 Decided: June 28, 2021

Before KING and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Ricky Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Ricky Butler seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting in part and denying

in part Defendants’ motions for summary judgment, denying Butler’s motions for

reconsideration, and granting in part and denying in part several pretrial motions in Butler’s

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949).

“Ordinarily, a di strict court order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties.”

Porter v. Zook , 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Our review of the record reveals that the district court did not adjudicate all of t he

claims raised in Butler’s complaint

. Id. at 696

- 97. Because Butler’s claims against one
Defendant are still proceeding before the district court, and the court did not certify its

orders for immediate appeal, we conclude that t he order s Butler seeks to appeal are neither

final order s nor appealable interlocutory or collateral order s. Accordingly, we deny

Butler’s motion to voluntarily withdraw certain claims as moot and dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction. Id. at 699.

We dispense wi th oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED