alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      | PORTER BANCORP, INC. |
|---------------------------|----------------------|
|                      |                 |   |
|                      |                 |   |
| Dated:  May 16, 2011 | By:                  | /s/ David B. Pierce |
|                      |                 |  David B. Pierce |
|                      |                 |  Chief Financial Officer |
#### In the Matter of Jacqueline Perez, Respondent, v John B. Rhea, as Chairman of the New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

Submitted August 6, 2012;

decided August 28, 2012

Motion by Housing Court Answers, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 19 copies filed within seven days.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9                          
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000                   
                                     
<S>                             <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         102,948
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          12,910
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                71,730
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    803,519
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         521,082
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           517,981
<LOANS>                                      3,555,524
<ALLOWANCE>                                     38,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,259,857
<DEPOSITS>                                   3,863,180
<SHORT-TERM>                                   588,877
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             76,691
<LONG-TERM>                                    269,439
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              415
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     461,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               5,259,857
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                125,856
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,612
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                40,011
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               177,479
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              81,213
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,796
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           77,683
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 377
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 62,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,981
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      27,902
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (403)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,499
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.24
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,265
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,433
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   857
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 39,891
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                39,985
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,374
<RECOVERIES>                                       750
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               38,361
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            38,361
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
  OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Clean Power
Concepts Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated May 15, 2007

By:   /s/ Cory Turner
           Cory Turner 
           CEO, CFO, President, Secretary
  and Treasurer 
           (Principal Executive Officer,
  Principal Financial 
           Officer and Principal Accounting
  Officer)

---
#### Eastside Exhibition Corp., Appellant, v 210 East 86th Street Corp., Respondent.

Submitted April 9, 2012;

decided June 26, 2012

Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*18 NY3d 617 (2012)].
EX-4.6



 Exhibit 4.6 
 Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting) Services, Inc. 
 Basic
Prototype Defined Contribution Retirement Plan 
 Claims Procedure Amendment 

Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting) Services, Inc., as the Prototype Sponsor, hereby adopts this amendment to its pre-approved Thomson Reuters
(Tax & Accounting) Services Inc. Basic Prototype Defined Contribution Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) (formerly known as the AccuDraft Basic Prototype Defined Contribution Retirement Plan) for purposes of reflecting the claims
procedures in the Plan document. This amendment is intended to address the United States Supreme Court holding in CIGNA Corp. v Amara and subsequent case law interpreting that holding. The amendment is effective, with respect to each
individual defined contribution plan adopted by a Sponsoring Employer based on the Plan, as of the later of (a) the first day of the Plan Year that includes the date this amendment was adopted by the Prototype Sponsor or (b) the effective
date of the individual defined contribution plan. 
 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT PROVISIONS

 Section 8.9 of the Basic Plan is amended in full to read as follows: 

 

	8.9	Claims Procedures. The claims procedure required under ERISA §503 and Department of Labor Regulations thereunder is set forth in an administrative policy
regarding claims procedures that is promulgated under Section 8.6 by the Administrator. The terms of such administrative policy are incorporated as part of the Plan by reference. Such administrative policy will be the sole and exclusive remedy
for an Employee, Participant or Beneficiary (“Claimant”) to make a claim for benefits under the Plan. No civil action for benefits under the Plan will be brought unless and until the aggrieved person has (a) submitted a timely claim
for benefits in accordance with the provisions of the claims procedure; (b) been notified by the Administrator that the claim has been denied (or such claim is deemed denied); (c) filed a written request for a review of the claim in
accordance with the claims procedure; and (d) been notified in writing of an adverse benefit determination on review. Any civil action by an aggrieved person will be based solely on the contentions advanced by the aggrieved person in the
administrative review process and the judicial review will be limited to the Plan document and the record developed during the administrative review process. 

 SECTION 2. EXECUTION 
 Thomson Reuters (Tax &
Accounting) Services, Inc., as the Prototype Sponsor, hereby adopts this amendment to the Plan on the date set forth below. 
  

									
					
	 By
	 	/s/ Donald C. Whitmire	 		 		 	Date: April 23, 2012
		 	 Donald C. Whitmire, Senior Editor
#### In re JOSHUA HENDY IRON WORKS. HENDY REALIZATION CO. et al. v. BEHNEMAN et al. SHORES v. HENDY REALIZATION CO. et al.

Nos. 25937-S, 21792-S.

District Court, N. D. California, S. D.

Jan. 20, 1942.

Byrne, Lamson & Jordan and Paul S. Jordan, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

Stanley Pedder, Kenneth Ferguson, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, and Long & Levit, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

ST. SURE, District Judge.

An appeal has been taken from the judgment in the above-entitled consolidated causes.

Appellees move “to require appellants to file reporter’s transcript; and to direct the Clerk as to the certification and transmittal of a proper record on appeal.”

Appellants’ “Designation of Contents of Record on Appeal,” Rule 75(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, included only certain portions of the transcript. Appellees request that the court compel appellants to furnish and file a complete record.

Appellees may properly request additional portions of the record, as well as two copies of the reporter’s transcript. Rule 75(a) and (b), F.R.C.P.; Cloud v. McLean-Arkansas Lbr. Co., D.C., 28 F.Supp. 623.

Appellant is protected by Rule 75 (e), which provides that inessential matter shall be omitted, and if appellee violates this rule, “the appellate court may withhold or impose costs as the circumstances of the case and discouragement of like conduct in the future may require; and costs may be imposed upon offending attorneys or parties.” This will be done where the request is unreasonable. Amerlux Steel Corp. v. Johnson Line, *9*Cir., 33 F.2d 70, 71.

The motion will be granted.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00821-CV

GOLDEN REHABILITATION CENTER, L.L.C.,

Appellant

v.

Juanita PEREZ, Virginia Garcia, Paul Zapata, and Sylvia Sanchez, Individually and as Heirs of 

Elisa Zapata,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-06946

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is reinstated, the stay 

imposed upon the trial court proceedings is lifted and this appeal is dismissed. The cause is 

remanded to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement 

agreement. 

SIGNED July 15, 2015.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice
Amendment 2 To


 


DEFERRED COMPENSATION DEFERRAL AND CONVERSION
OPTION AGREEMENT


 


This Agreement (the “Amendment Agreement”) is an
amendment to the DEFERRED COMPENSATION DEFERRAL AND CONVERSION OPTION AGREEMENT dated the 27th day of March, 2013 (“Conversion
Option Agreement”), by and between GRANT RUSSELL ("Executive"), and VUZIX CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Company").


 


In consideration of the mutual covenants
and agreements contained herein and in the Conversion Option Agreement, the parties agree to amend the Conversion Option Agreement
effective immediately as follows:


 


		1.	Paragraph 5 (a) (v) of the Conversion Option Agreement as amended currently provides that:



 


5 (a) (v) Before June 30, 2013, the Company shall
have consummated a public offering of its securities as described in its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-185661),
as amended.


 


The Conversion Option Agreement Paragraph
5 (a) (v) is hereby amended to state:


 


			5 (a) (v) Before August 31, 2013, the Company shall have
                                                              consummated a public offering of its securities as described in
                                                              its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-185661), as
                                                              amended.



 


		2.	Paragraph 5 (b) (iii) of the Conversion Option Agreement currently provides that:



 


5 (b) (iii) Before June 30, 2013, the Company shall
have consummated a public offering of its securities as described in its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-185661),
as amended.


 


The Conversion Option Agreement Paragraph 5 (b) (iii)
is hereby amended to state:


 


5 (b) (iii) Before August 31 2013, the Company
shall have consummated a public offering of its securities as described in its Registration Statement on Form S-1(File No. 333-185661)
, as amended.


 


		3.	All provisions and terms making reference to or subject to the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSXV”) or
listing thereon shall be deleted and removed from the Conversion Agreement and any amendments there to.



 


		4.	All other provisions and terms of the Conversion Option Agreement and any amendments thereto shall remain the in effect in
accordance with their original terms.



 




    	 



    	 



    

 


EXECUTED on this 26th day of July 2013.


 


	Company: Vuzix Corporation	Executive: Grant Russell
	 	 
	By: /s/ Paul Travers	/s/ Grant Russell
	 	 
	Name:  Paul Travers	Grant Russell
	Title:  President & CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 485 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 485

  Recognizing the historic significance of the ``Betsy Ross Flag'', a 
   symbolic representation of America's revolutionary period and our 
               Nation's commitment to freedom and unity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2019

Mr. Bost (for himself, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Brooks of Alabama, Mr. Collins 
 of New York, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Reschenthaler, Mr. Baird, 
 Mr. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. 
LaHood, Mr. Comer, Mr. Walker, Mr. Riggleman, Mr. Brady, Mr. Gianforte, 
 Mr. Meadows, Mr. Shimkus, and Mr. Moolenaar) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the historic significance of the ``Betsy Ross Flag'', a 
   symbolic representation of America's revolutionary period and our 
               Nation's commitment to freedom and unity.

Whereas legend credits Elizabeth Griscom Ross, popularly known as Betsy Ross, 
        with the creation of the new American Nation's 13-starred flag;
Whereas Betsy Ross was born on January 1, 1752, in the city of Philadelphia, 
        Pennsylvania;
Whereas Betsy Ross' first husband, John Ross, perished while serving as a member 
        of the Pennsylvania militia during the American Revolutionary War, 
        leaving Betsy Ross a widow at the age of 24;
Whereas Betsy Ross, a seamstress, worked as a flag maker during the war, and 
        according to legend, met with General George Washington to complete a 
        design for a flag of the United States;
Whereas such flag designs have been popularly called the Betsy Ross Flag;
Whereas Betsy Ross has been recognized as an important historical and cultural 
        figure, and her legacy has been associated with patriotic causes and the 
        fight for the equal rights of women;
Whereas the Betsy Ross Flag has been presented at numerous historical, cultural, 
        and political events of great significance, including America's 
        Bicentennial celebration and Presidential inaugural ceremonies;
Whereas the United States Postal Service commissioned a commemorative stamp in 
        1952 to honor the 200th anniversary of the birth of Betsy Ross; and
Whereas the Betsy Ross Flag continues to serve as a reminder of a new nation's 
        founding spirit and commitment to liberty, a commitment that continues 
        to make the United States a beacon for freedom across the world: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes that the 
spirit of the Betsy Ross Flag should be celebrated and has served as an 
inspiration for the cause of freedom.
                                 <all>
```
The City of San



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 16, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00720

- CV

Marilyn STEWART, Appellant

v.

THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 09344 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On April 30, 2014, this court ordered appellant to file written proof with this court by May 15, 2014, that she had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the preparation of the
clerk’s record and reporter’s record for this appeal. On May 14, 2014, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating that appellant had “made a payment arrangement, with the first payment of $10.00 to be paid on or around May 28, 2014.” At the top of th e notification of late record, appellant added a handwritten note stating, “This is proof of payment arrangement for the
clerk’s record.” The trial court clerk has informed this court that the total cost of the clerk’s record will be $80.00. The notifica tion by the trial court clerk that the first payment will be made “on or around” May 28, 2014, does not provide this court with sufficient information regarding the payment arrangement s because it does not provide a date certain for payment. In addition, appellant’s note does not inform this court of the dates when the balance of the fee for preparing the clerk’s record will be paid or even address the fee for preparing the reporter’s

record.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide this court with specific dates when all of the fees for the clerk’s record and reporter’s record will be paid no later than ten days from the date of this order. If appellant fails to respond to this order within the time provided, this appeal

will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b) (c)

._________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of May, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit
32.1




INTEGRATED
MICROMETALLURGICAL SYSTEMS, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the periodic report of INTEGRATED MICROMETALLURGICAL SYSTEMS,
INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), I, Hans-Werner Huss, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)
 the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.





This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.




Date: November
20, 2007







By:
            /s/
      H.WernerHussH.
      Werner Huss, PresidentChief
      Executive Officer






---
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00643-CV

JOSEPH GLASS AND HILDEGARD GLASS, Appellants

V.

MILES GILBERT D/B/A MG SHEET METAL WORKS, Appellee

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 

1013437).

TO THE COUNTY CIVIL COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF HARRIS COUNTY, 

GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 25th day of June 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed 

by the trial court on May 28, 2014. After submitting the case 

on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by 

the parties, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the portion of the trial court’s judgment that granted summary 

judgment on the breach of contract and unjust enrichment 

claims. Accordingly, the Court reverses this portion of the 

trial court’s judgment.

The Court further holds that there was no reversible 

error in the remaining portions of the trial court’s judgment. 

Therefore, the Court affirms the remaining portions of the 

trial court’s judgment.
The Court further remands the case to the trial court 

for further proceedings.

The Court orders that appellate costs are assessed 

against each party incurring same. 

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered June 25, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bland.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

July 14, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
Exhibit 32
                                                       ----------

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

  In  connection  with the Annual Report of Diversified  Historic
Investors IV on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,  2003
as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Spencer Wertheimer,  President  and
Treasurer of the Company's managing partner, EPK, Inc.,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all  material  respects, the financial condition and  results  of
operations of the Company.



Date: August 28, 2006                          /s/ Spencer Wertheimer
      ---------------                          ----------------------
                                        Name:  Spencer Wertheimer
                                       Title:  President (principal
                                               executive officer,
                                               principal financial
                                               officer) of the
                                               registrant's managing
                                               partner, EPK, Inc.

<PAGE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darren Patterson, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 474]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 10,1997 *(People v Patterson,*237 AD2d 384 [1997]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 13, 1995.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see *Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Florio, J.E, Spolzino, Skelos and Fisher, JJ., concur.