alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 14 (Friday, January 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4316-4317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFFAIRS


Voluntary Service National Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under Public Law 
92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the annual meeting of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs Voluntary Service (VAVS) National 
Advisory Committee (NAC) will be held May 20-22, 2009, at the Marriott 
Westchase, 2900 Briarpark Drive, Houston, Texas. The meeting is open to 
the public, and the sessions are scheduled as follows:
    May 20--2 p.m. until 4 p.m.
    May 21--8:30 a.m. until 4 p.m.
    May 22--8:30 a.m. until 4 p.m.
    The Committee, comprised of sixty-three national voluntary 
organizations, advises the Secretary, through the Under Secretary for 
Health, on the coordination and promotion of volunteer activities 
within VA health care facilities. The primary purposes of this meeting 
are: To provide for Committee review of volunteer policies and 
procedures; to accommodate full and open communications between 
organization representatives and the Voluntary Service Office and field 
staff; to provide educational opportunities geared towards improving 
volunteer programs with special emphasis on methods to recruit, retain, 
motivate and recognize volunteers; and to approve Committee 
recommendations.
    The May 20 session will involve opening ceremonies and remarks by 
several VA and local officials. The May 21 session will feature the 
Voluntary Service Report and recognition of the recipients of the VAVS 
Award for Excellence and NAC Volunteers of the Year. In addition, the 
James H. Parke Memorial Scholarship Luncheon will be held to honor an 
outstanding youth

[[Page 4317]]

volunteer. Educational workshops will be held in the afternoon.
    On May 22, the business session will include subcommittee reports. 
This session will be followed by a repeat of the educational workshops 
and closing remarks from the Chairman.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. However, interested persons may either 
attend or file statements with the Committee. Written statements may be 
filed either before the meeting or within 10 days after the meeting and 
addressed to: Ms. Laura B. Balun, Director, Voluntary Service Office 
(10C2), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20420. Individuals interested in attending are 
encouraged to contact Ms. Balun at (202) 461-7300.
    By Direction of the Secretary.


    Dated: January 16, 2009.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
 [FR Doc. E9-1506 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cheryl Santiago, Appellant.

Submitted January 22, 2013;

decided February 7, 2013

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Malvina Nathanson, Esq., 40 Exchange Place, Suite 2010, New York, NY 10005 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 5015** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TAHARA NICOLE GAINEY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. James A. Beaty, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 1:11

- cr - 00088

- JAB

- 1 )

Submitted : March 29, 2012 Decided: April 2, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Louis C. Allen III, Federal Public Defender, Gregory Davis , Senior Litigator , Winston

- Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Randall Stuart Galyon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished o pinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tahara Nicole Gainey pled guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement to distributing 53.2 grams of cocaine base “crack” and was sentenced to 216 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, counsel f iled a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but raising the following issue: whether Gainey’s sentence was unreasonable because the district court imposed a sentence greater tha n necessary to accomplish the goals of 18
U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006). After United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), we review a sentence for reasonableness, whether inside or outside the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range, applying a deferential abu se - of

- discretion standard. Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 49 (2007). We first review a sentence for significant procedural error and then evaluate the sentence for substantive

error. Id. at 51; United States v. Carter , 564 F.3d 325, 328 (4th Cir. 2 009). We find no abuse of discretion in Gainey’s
sentence , which was imposed within a properly calculated advisory Sentencing Guidelines range. United States v. Allen , 491 F.3d 178, 193 (4th Cir. 2007) (“A sentence within the proper Sentencing Guidelines range is presumptively reasonable.”) (citation omitted); see Rita v. United States , 551 U.S. 338, 347 (2007).3 In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Gai ney’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform Gainey, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Gainey requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a p etition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Gainey. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are a dequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
@misc{1208051,
  author = {Ashley Beasley Green and Johanna Camara and N. Alan Heckert},
  title = {Certification of Standard Reference Material® 3666 Albumin and Creatinine in Frozen Human Urine},
  year = {2023},
  month = {2023-06-26 04:06:00},
  publisher = {Special Publication (NIST SP), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  url = {https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=936805},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.260-238},
  language = {en},
}
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 of Blue Ridge Real Estate Company and Big Boulder Corporation (together , the Registrants) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eldon D. Dietterick, Executive Vice President and Treasurer (principal financial officer) of the Registrants, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 78o(d)

)

; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.







/s/ Eldon D. Dietterick

Eldon D. Dietterick

Executive Vice President and Treasurer

(Chief Financial Officer)

February 22, 2010
J-S04046-16

2016 PA S uper 41

*Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Cour t. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee

v. JAMES PAUL FINNECY, Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1871 WDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence October 7, 201 4, in the Court of Common Pleas of Venango County, Criminal Division, at No(s): CP-61-CR-0000498-2013

CP-61-CR-0000688-2009 BEFORE: BOWES, OLSON, and STRASSBURGER, JJ.* CONCURRING OPINION BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED FEBRUARY 18, 2016 I join the Majority Opinion. I agree with the Majo rity that Appellant’s conviction for resisting arrest renders him ineligi ble for the RRRI program. I also agree that the trial court did not abuse its d iscretion in not ordering a new PSI report. Finally, I agree that the trial co urt did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Appellant to 121⁄2 to 25 year s of incarceration. I write separately, however, to point out just how mu ch discretion the trial

court had in the instant matter. Instantly, if all of Appellant’s sentences had been ordered to run concurrently, he would have received an aggregate s entence of 21⁄2 to 5 years’ incarceration. As the trial court pointed o ut, all sentences running consecutively would have resulted in 41 to 82 years ’ incarceration. N.T., 10/7/2014, at 38. Either way, for all practical pu rposes, this Court would be required to affirm Appellant’s judgment of sentence at either end and forJ-S04046-16

- 2 -

anything in between. See Commonwealth v. Klueber , 904 A.2d 911 (Pa. 2006) (holding that standard range consecutive sent ences are not clearly

unreasonable where the trial court relies on the de fendant’s prior history and a finding that he was a high risk to re-offend). This type of virtually unfettered discretion result s in similarly situated defendants being treated disparately, a situation o ur jurisprudence should

not countenance.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael Bruch, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cesca Therapeutics Inc.;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                        |  |        | Cesca Therapeutics Inc.
|----------------------- |  | ------ | -----------------------
|Dated: October 27, 2016 |  | By:/s/ | Michael Bruch          
|                        |  |        | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of ThermoGenesis Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period  ended June 30, 2004,  as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  each  of the
undersigned  officers of the Company  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to such officer's knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of  Section 13(a)  or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the  Company as of the dates and for the periods  expressed  in the
          Report.

Date:  September 9, 2004           /s/  PHILIP  H.  COELHO
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Philip H. Coelho
                                   Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors and
                                   Chief Executive Officer

                                   /s/  RENEE M. RUECKER
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Name: Renee M. Ruecker
                                   Title: Chief Financial Officer

                                       64
<PAGE>

                                   SCHEDULE II

                               ThermoGenesis Corp.
                        VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                               <C>               <C>               <C>              <C>

                                               Balance at        Charged to        Write-offs       Balance at
                                              beginning of        costs and          (net of          end of
                                                 period           expenses         recoveries)        period
                                              --------------    --------------    --------------   --------------

Allowance of Doubtful Accounts:

For the year ended June 30, 2004                    $80,000                --           $19,000          $61,000

For the year ended June 30, 2003                    $84,000            $1,000            $5,000          $80,000

For the year ended June 30, 2002                    $84,000           $35,000           $35,000          $84,000
</TABLE>

                                       65
@misc{1161516,
  author = {Chester H Page and Paul Vigoureux},
  title = {The International Bureau of Weights and Measures 1875-1975:},
  year = {1975},
  month = {1975-01-01 05:01:00},
  publisher = {, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD},
  doi = {https://doi.org/10.6028/NBS.SP.420},
  language = {en},
}
Exhibit 10.2


 




Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the


Securities and Exchange Commission. Double asterisks denote omissions.


 





 



 








PAGE 2


 


The purpose of this modification is to transfer Government Furnished Property identified in Emergent Contract 200-2009-30162 to this contract; 200-2011-42084, in accordance with FAR 45.106.  This transfer of property is at no additional cost to the Government.  As a result, this modification revises Section J – CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS OR ATTACHMENTS to add Government Furnished Property (GFP) to contract #200-2011-42084 as follows:


	
 

	
Tag #

	
Asset Description

	
Cap Data

	
Acquisition Value


	
[**]

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
[**]

	
[**]










Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A total of eight pages were omitted. [**]


 


 


 


 


Consider all other terms and conditions of the contract unchanged and in full force and effect.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7583

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus ABDAL MALIEK SALAAM, a/k/a Gary McLaughlin, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-94-79, CR-94-80, CA-97-722-1) Submitted: March 14, 2000 Decided: March 24, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abdal Maliek Salaam, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Even if Salaam’s notice of appeal was timely, he would not be entitled to relief on appeal. The district court’s conclusion that Salaam’s § 2255 motion could not be considered because it was not filed within the one-year limitations period of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act is clearly correct. 2 PER CURIAM: Abdal Maliek Salaam seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing as untimely Salaam’s 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Salaam’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. In civil cases in which the United States is a party, a notice of appeal must be filed no later than sixty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on July 16, 1999. Salaam’s notice of appeal was filed on November 9, 1999. Because Salaam failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *3 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
** **

** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Good Times RestaurantsInc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, BoydE. Hoback, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Susan M. Knutson, asController of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to and solely forthe purpose of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)        TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)        Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| */s/ Boyd E. Hoback*    | */s/ Susan M. Knutson*                   |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Boyd E. Hoback          | Susan M. Knutson                         |
| Chief Executive Officer | Controller (principal financial officer) |
| May 16, 2011            | May 16, 2011                             |

----
Exhibit 10.6



SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS WITH

INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS



|Name                   |  | Date of Agreement
|---------------------- |  | -----------------
|Robert V. Ahlgren      |  | April 1, 2002    
|Michael K. Bresson     |  | December 7, 2001 
|Dennis B. Brown        |  | April 1, 2003    
|Frank H. Jellinek, Jr. |  | December 7, 2001 
|Gary J. Marmontello    |  | December 7, 2001 
|Peter Scheu            |  | December 7, 2001 
|Michael S. Smith       |  | June 18, 2003    
|Mark F. Stuppy         |  | December 7, 2001 
|Stephen K. Wiatt       |  | December 7, 2001 
|Stephen R. Hardis      |  | October 1, 2001  
|R. Jeffrey Harris      |  | December 7, 2001 
|Joe L. Roby            |  | December 7, 2001 
|Kenneth F. Yontz       |  | December 7, 2001 
|William H. Binnie      |  | December 7, 2001 
|Don H. Davis, Jr.      |  | December 7, 2001 
|Christopher L. Doerr   |  | December 7, 2001 
|Richard W. Vieser      |  | December 7, 2001
Exhibit 32.2
------------



                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathon M. Singer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

      i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
            section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
            of 1934; and

      ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
            in all material respects, the financial condition and
            result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                    /s/ Jonathon M. Singer
                                    ---------------------------------
                                    Jonathon M. Singer
                                    Chief Financial Officer



February 8, 2007
EXHIBIT 32(a)



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of The Bank of New York Company, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 22, 2005



/s/ Thomas A. RenyiName: Thomas A. RenyiTitle: Chief Executive Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of TaxMasters, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Koscinski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Christopher J. Koscinski
 Christopher J. Koscinski, Chief Financial Officer
 February 16, 2012
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 6 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
MARCOS ALONZO DE LA CRUZ, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DONALD A. DORSEY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Respondents - Appellees. No. 96-2116 (D.C. No. CIV-94-30-HB) (District of New Mexico)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before TACHA , HENRY and LUCERO , Circuit Judges. Upon careful consideration of the record, the brief s of the parties, the district court’s order, and the applicable law, we AFFIRM for substantially the reasons stated in the district court’s order. ENTERED FOR THE COURT
Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge