alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
4.2


 


Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


 


We
have issued our report dated August 18, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2126 contained
in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-265001) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use
of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the
caption “Experts”.


 


		/s/
Grant Thornton LLP



 


Chicago,
Illinois


August
18, 2022
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies,
Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Amendment No. 9 to Form 10Q/A for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Martin S Smiley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s/ Martin S.
SmileyMartin S .Smiley Chief Financial Officer

March 22, 2011

---
----

|   | (1)    |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                             |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (2)    |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |

|                                  |   |               |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|
| By: /s/ Joseph      Young   |   | July      11, 2008 |
|                                  |   |               |
| Joseph      Young,                    |   |               |
| Princpal      Accounting Officer      |   |               |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,697
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,406
<INVENTORY>                                     45,375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,172
<PP&E>                                         432,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                 255,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 412,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          484,779
<BONDS>                                        108,146
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,748
<OTHER-SE>                                   (224,123)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   412,550
<SALES>                                         95,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               178,146
<CGS>                                          131,841
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  217,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (204,249)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (204,249)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (204,249)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.005)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-86494) of American
Locker Group, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated March 18, 2005, May 12, 2005 and August 31, 2007 with respect to the financial statements and financial
statement schedule of American Locker Group Incorporated included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/
Schneider Downs & Co., Inc.
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
August 31, 2007

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                    The Consolidated Balance Sheet As Of August 31, 1997 And The
                    Consolidated  Statement  Of Income For The Nine Months Ended
                    August 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                                      U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,232
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                   116
<INVENTORY>                                    248
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,658
<PP&E>                                         36,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 26,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,292
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       889
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   26,782
<SALES>                                        9,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,922
<CGS>                                          2,323
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,385
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,286
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,099
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,099
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .54
<FN>
<F1>
Five-For-Four  stocksplit May 27, 1997;  Prior financial data schedules have not
been restated for this split.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23**

**SpherixIncorporated**

----

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reportdated March 29, 2007 accompanying the consolidated financial statements (whichreport expressed an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraphrelating to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, “*Share-Based Payment*,”effective January 1, 2006) included in the Annual Report of SpherixIncorporated on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.  We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of said report in the Registration Statements of Spherix Incorporatedon Form S-8 (File No. 333-66053 effective October 23, 1998), onForms S-3 (File No. 333-44973 effective March 23, 1998,333-79593 effective May 28, 1999, and 333-32504 effective April 19,2000, and 333-116422 effective June 14, 2004) and on Forms S-2 (FileNo. 333-126930 effective October 4, 2005).

/s/  Grant Thornton LLP

McLean, VirginiaMarch 29, 2007

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

*** ***

***Certificationof the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Chief FinancialOfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSolera National Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas Crichfield, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Robert J. Fenton, VicePresident, Secretary & Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q,that we have reviewed the Form 10-Q and that to the best of our knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and

 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the Company’s financial conditionand results of operations as of the date and for the periods covered by theReport.

 
| Date: November 12, 2008 | /s/ Douglas Crichfield                              |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Douglas Crichfield                                  |
|                         | President and Chief Executive Officer               |
|                         | (Principal Executive Officer)                       |
|                         |                                                |
|                         |                                                |
|                         | /s/ Robert J. Fenton                                |
|                         | Robert J. Fenton                                    |
|                         | Vice President, Secretary & Treasurer      |
|                         | (Principal Accounting and Chief Financial  Officer) |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Jennifer McLaughlin, Respondent, v Timothy McLaughlin, Appellant.

[977 NYS2d 664]

Motion for reargument denied. Present — Scudder, EJ., Fahey, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20826 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DAVID SCOTT EVANS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-615-1

-------------------- June 7, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM: * David Scott Evans (Evans) appeals his guilty-plea conviction for aiding and abetting the possession with intent to distribute more than 10 grams of lysergic acid in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), b(1)(A)(v). He contends that the district court erred in assessing him two criminal history points for a prior juvenile adjudication which resulted in his commitment to a mental hospital. He argues that he should haveNo. 01-20826 -2- received only one criminal history point for his juvenile adjudication, which would have made him eligible for the “safety valve” provision of United States Sentencing Guidelines § 5C2.3, thereby reducing his offense level by two points and his guidelines punishment range to 87 to 108 months. As Evans failed to raise these arguments at the sentencing hearing, we review for plain error. See United States v. McCaskey , 9 F.3d 368, 376 (5th Cir. 1993). As we have not previously addressed whether commitment to a mental hospital constitutes a “sentence to confinement” under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(d)(2)(A) or a “sentence of imprisonment” under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(b), there can be no plain error with respect to this issue. Even assuming arguendo that the district court erred in calculating Evans’s criminal history score and that the guidelines range should have been 87 to 108 months, Evans has not shown that the error affected his substantial rights as his sentence of 100 months was within that range. See United States v. Leonard , 157 F.3d 343, 346 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Ravitch , 128 F.3d 865, 871 (5th Cir. 1990).
AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of Starla D., Respondent, v Jeremy E., Appellant.

Submitted July 16, 2012;

decided September 11, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             BKF CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of BKF Capital Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John A. Levin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (including subsections (a) (b) and (c)
thereof), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                     /s/ John A. Levin
                                                   -----------------------
                                                       John A. Levin
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

May 11, 2005
II 

Calendar No. 650 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3650 

To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that fathers 

of certain permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be included 

with mothers of such veterans as preference eligibles for treatment in 

the civil service. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2010 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. VOINOVICH, Ms. COLLINS, Ms. 

LANDRIEU, and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 18, 2010 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to 

provide that fathers of certain permanently disabled or 

deceased veterans shall be included with mothers of such 

veterans as preference eligibles for treatment in the civil 

service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3650 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jessica Ann Ellis Gold 

3 Star Fathers Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PREFERENCE ELIGIBLE TREATMENT FOR FATHERS 

5 OF CERTAIN PERMANENTLY DISABLED OR 

6 DECEASED VETERANS. 

7 Section 2108(3) of title 5, United States Code, is 

8 amended by striking subparagraphs (F) and (G) and in9 serting the following: 

10 ‘‘(F) the parent of an individual who lost 

11 his or her life under honorable conditions while 

12 serving in the armed forces during a period 

13 named by paragraph (1)(A) of this section, if— 

14 ‘‘(i) the spouse of that parent is to15 tally and permanently disabled; or 

16 ‘‘(ii) that parent, when preference is 

17 claimed, is unmarried or, if married, le18 gally separated from his or her spouse; 

19 ‘‘(G) the parent of a service-connected per20 manently and totally disabled veteran, if— 

21 ‘‘(i) the spouse of that parent is to22 tally and permanently disabled; or 

23 ‘‘(ii) that parent, when preference is 

24 claimed, is unmarried or, if married, le25 gally separated from his or her spouse; 

26 and’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3650 RS

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 

3 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 650 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3650 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States 

erence eligibles for treatment in the civil service. cluded with mothers of such veterans as prefnently disabled or deceased veterans shall be inCode, to provide that fathers of certain permaNOVEMBER 18, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund II-OW (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMSDouglas P. Williams Chief
Financial Officer





August 12, 2002
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



I, Paul E. Martin, the Principal Financial Officer of Enstar Income/Growth Program Six-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

- fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/  Paul E. MartinPaul E. MartinPrincipal Financial OfficerMay 17, 2004
- 2018.01.18 Ltr re Amendment to the Kickapoo Tribe of OK to Tribe Chair from NIGC
- 3303-2
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3640 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitations 

on the amount excluded from the gross estate with respect to land 

subject to a qualified conservation easement. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2010 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. GREGG, Mr. BENNET, 

and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the limitations on the amount excluded from the gross 

estate with respect to land subject to a qualified conservation easement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Family 

5 Farm and Ranchland Protection Act of 2010’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3640 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATIONS ON THE AMOUNT EX2 CLUDED FROM THE GROSS ESTATE WITH RE3 SPECT TO LAND SUBJECT TO A QUALIFIED 

4 CONSERVATION EASEMENT. 

5 (a) INCREASE IN DOLLAR LIMITATION ON EXCLU6 SION.—Paragraph (3) of section 2031(c) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exclusion limitation) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘the exclusion limitation is’’ and 

9 all that follows and inserting ‘‘the exclusion limitation is 

10 $5,000,000.’’. 

11 (b) INCREASE IN PERCENTAGE OF VALUE OF LAND

12 WHICH IS EXCLUDABLE.—Paragraph (2) of section 

13 2031(c) of such Code (relating to applicable percentage) 

14 is amended— 

15 (1) by striking ‘‘40 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘50 

16 percent’’, and 

17 (2) by striking ‘‘2 percentage points’’ and in18 serting ‘‘2.5 percentage points’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to the estates of decedents dying 

21 after December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
*Wednesday, March 19, 1997*

DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED

96-2727.

#### In re Estate of Baughman.

Warren App. No. CA96-02-018.

Resnick, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
1Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-10337

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

JOE WESLEY CROSSLIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(4:96-CR-131-A-1)

February 10, 1998

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Appellant-Crosslin’s petition for rehearing is granted to the

extent and for the reasons set forth below. Our panel decision is

otherwise left undisturbed. In his petition, Crosslin correctly

points out that we erred in affirming the fine imposed by the

district court. “When a sentencing court adopts a [presentence
investigation report] which recites facts showing limited or no

ability to pay a fine the government must then come forward with

evidence showing that a defendant can in fact pay a fine before one

can be imposed.” United States v. Fair, 979 F.2d 1037, 1041 (5th

Cir. 1992). Here, the district court adopted the presentence

investigation report. The presentence investigation report

contained evidence that the defendant could not pay. See

Presentence Investigation Report ¶ 45. The government did not come

forward with evidence to show ability to pay. And the court did

not articulate its reasons for departing from the presentence

investigation report. Under these circumstances, we cannot uphold

the fine imposed by the district court. See United States v.

Hodges, 110 F.3d 250, 251 (5th Cir. 1997).

For the foregoing reasons, Crosslin’s petition for rehearing

is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. We VACATE Crosslin’s $5,000

fine and REMAND this case for further consideration. Crosslin’s

conviction and sentence of incarceration are otherwise AFFIRMED.