alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 2/4/14 P. v. Murray CA2/7

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

RONALD MURRAY,

Defendant and Appellant.

 B249132

 (Los Angeles County

 Super. Ct. No. YA082450)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 

Mark S. Arnold, Judge. Affirmed. 

Linn Davis, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. 

_____________________
2

Ronald Murray was charged in an information with the murder of Mun Seog Jang 

(Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a)).1 Represented by counsel, Murray pleaded not guilty to 

the charge.

According to the evidence at trial, early on the morning of September 30, 2011, 

there was a physical confrontation outside a Gardenia donut shop between Murray and 

Jang, both of whom had been drinking alcohol. Murray punched Jang, who fell to the 

ground, and then punched and/or kicked Jang on the chest and head.2 Police were called,

and Jang was transported to the hospital, where he later died of his head injuries. The 

jury acquitted Murray of second degree murder and convicted him of voluntary 

manslaughter (§ 192, subd. (a)) as a lesser included offense.

Following argument by counsel, the trial court sentenced Murray to the middle 

term of six years in state prison. The court ordered Murray to pay a $40 court security 

fee, a $30 criminal conviction assessment, a $240 restitution fine and $47,057.80 in 

victim restitution. The court imposed and suspended a parole revocation fine pursuant to 

section 1202.45. Murray was awarded a total of 622 days of presentence credit (541

actual days and 81 days conduct credit).

We appointed counsel to represent Murray on appeal. After examination of the 

record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. On October 4, 

2013 we advised Murray he had 30 days in which to personally submit any contentions or 

issues he wished us to consider. No response has been received to date. 

We have examined the record and are satisfied Murray’s attorney has fully 

complied with the responsibilities of counsel and no arguable issue exists. (Smith v. 

Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284 [120 S.Ct. 746, 145 L.Ed.2d 756]; People v. Kelly

(2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 112-113; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.) 

 

1 Statutory references are to the Penal Code. 

2 A video of the incident recorded by a donut shop security camera was played for 

the jury. 
3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

ZELON, J. 

We concur:

PERLUSS, P. J

WOODS, J.
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, that to his knowledge:

      1) BKF Capital Group, Inc.'s Form 10-K for the annual period ended
      December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2) The information contained in BKF Capital Group, Inc.'s Form 10-KSB for
      the annual period ended December 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated:  March 31, 2011


                                            /s/ Maria Fregosi
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Maria Fregosi, CFO
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 197 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to Marcus 

Garvey. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2019 

Ms. CLARKE of New York (for herself, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. NORTON, Mr. LEWIS, Mr. 

MEEKS, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. 

JEFFRIES, Mr. RICHMOND, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. MCEACHIN, and Ms. PRESSLEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with 

respect to Marcus Garvey. 

Whereas Marcus Mosiah Garvey, Jamaica’s first national 

hero, was born in St. Ann’s Bay, Jamaica, on August 17, 

1887, and died on June 10, 1940; 

Whereas Marcus Garvey emigrated to the United States, 

where he founded the Universal Negro Improvement Association; 

Whereas Marcus Garvey was the father of the largest African-American movement for human rights and economic 

self-sufficiency of all time, attracting millions of followers 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 197 IH 

in the United States, the Caribbean, Latin America, Africa, and Europe; 

Whereas Marcus Garvey’s philosophy inspired some of the 

world’s great Black leaders; 

Whereas leading a movement for economic independence 

among Black Americans, Marcus Garvey became the target of surveillance and harassment by United States Government law enforcement agencies; 

Whereas Marcus Garvey was prosecuted and convicted of 

mail fraud, imprisoned, and later, deported to Jamaica; 

Whereas the case against Marcus Garvey was politically motivated, the charges unsubstantiated, and his conviction 

unjust; 

Whereas millions of petitioners have appealed for his exoneration; 

Whereas Marcus Garvey is recognized as a national hero in 

his native Jamaica, and as a towering figure in nations 

around the world; and 

Whereas Marcus Garvey’s life and contributions to the 

United States should be recognized and appropriate steps 

taken to restore his name and reputation in this country: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) Marcus Garvey was innocent of the charges 

4 brought against him by the United States Govern5 ment; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 197 IH 

1 (2) Marcus Garvey was and should be recog2 nized internationally as a leader and thinker in the 

3 struggle for human rights; and 

4 (3) the President should take appropriate meas5 ures within his power to exonerate Marcus Garvey 

6 and clear his good name. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly
report of Medical Technology Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Todd E. Siegel, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                      | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Dated:  February 17, 2004             | 
|                                      | 
|/s/Todd E. Siegel                     | 
|Todd E. Siegel                        | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                      | 
|                                      |
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 9, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00993-CV

SAMUEL JOSEPH JACKSON, Appellant

V.

PAUL HOUSTON LAVALLE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-17352

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed November 14, 2014. No clerk’s 

record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal 

informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On May 28, 2015, this court ordered appellant to pay or make arrangements 

to pay for the record and provide this court with proof of payment on or before 
2

June 12, 2015. Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the 

record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, McCally and Donovan.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Sidney Wisdom, Respondent.

Submitted December 10, 2012;

decided December 11, 2012

*953Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the respondent on the appeal herein.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ MATTHEW A. JONESName:
    
    Matthew A. JonesTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer of the 
Managing General PartnerDate: August 16, 2010
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 11198 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MIGUE L ANGEL ZAPATA

- CORONADO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:14

- CR

- 229

- 1

Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Angel Zapata

- Coronado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Zapata

- Coronado h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 18 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-11198 Document: 00513158870 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015No. 14

- 11198

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for lea ve to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-11198 Document: 00513158870 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Solera National Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each ofthe undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to his knowledge:

 

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                                | SOLERA NATIONAL  BANCORP, INC.                |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: November 10,  2010      |                                               |
|                                |                                               |
|                                | By:                                                | /s/ Douglas Crichfield |
|                                | Douglas Crichfield                                 |
|                                | President & Chief  Executive Officer      |
|                                | (Principal Executive  Officer)                     |
|                                |                                               |
| Dated:  November 10, 2010 |                                               |
|                                |                                               |
|                                | By:                                                | /s/ Robert J. Fenton |
|                                | Robert J. Fenton                                   |
|                                | Executive Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer |
|                                | (Principal Accounting and  Financial Officer)      |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (“Section 906”), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Solera National Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained bySolera National Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Baldor Electric Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John A. McFarland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 28, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John A. McFarland
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | John A. McFarland Chief Executive Officer of Baldor Electric Company

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Baldor Electric Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald E. Tucker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                                                    
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 28, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Ronald E. Tucker
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Ronald E. Tucker Chief Financial Officer of Baldor Electric Company
CAUSE NUMBER 03—15—00284—CR 

EX PARTE X IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 X 

 X THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 

 X 

LEONARD RAY BARKER X STATE OF TEXAS 

APPELLANT’S AMENDED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR 

FILING OF APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

COMES NOW THE APPELLANT, by and through his appointed 

attorney of record, Paul M. Evans, in the above entitled and numbered 

cause, and moves this Court, to grant the Appellant’s Motion to Extend 

Time for Filing Appellant’s Brief, and, in support thereof, would show the 

Court as follows: 

 I.

Appellant’s Brief was due before this Court on June 18, 2015. No 

previous Motions to Extend Time have been sought. 

 II. 

The undersigned counsel needs additional time to examine the record 

and complete the research necessary to complete the Appellant’s Brief. 

Counsel reasonably anticipates that he will need only three weeks from the 

ACCEPTED

03-15-00284-CR

6048015

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/13/2015 7:41:19 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/13/2015 7:41:19 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
date of the filing of the instant motion to complete all requisite tasks while 

not causing undue slight to other pending clients, and would hereby 

respectfully request the deadline be extended to August 5, 2015. 

 III. 

This Motion is not made for purposes of delay, but so that justice 

might be served. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Defendant respectfully 

prays that this Court, upon good cause shown, grant the Appellant’s Motion 

to Extend Time for Filing Appellant’s Brief.

 Respectfully submitted,

 Law Office of Paul M. Evans

 811 Nueces Street

 Austin, Texas 78701

 (512) 569-1418

 (512) 692-8002 FAX

 _/s/ Paul M. Evans________ 

 PAUL M. EVANS

 SBN 24038885

 Attorney for Defendant
 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

was delivered by facsimile unto the office of the prosecuting attorney for the 

State of Texas—the Travis County District Attorney, mailing address P.O. 

Box 1748, Austin, TX, 78767, physical address 509 W. 11th Street, Austin, 

TX, 78701—on this the 13

th day of July, 2015. 

 

 _/s/ Paul M. Evans________ 

 PAUL M. EVANS

 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

 I hereby certify that the present document contains 348 words, all 

contents included. 

 _/s/ Paul M. Evans________ 

 PAUL M. EVANS
Exhibit No. 32

 

 

**Barnwell Industries, Inc.**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the undersigned officers ofBarnwell Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to suchofficer’s knowledge that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,2009 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information containedin the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, theconsolidated financial condition as of September 30, 2009 and consolidatedresults of operations for the year ended September 30, 2009 of the Companyand its subsidiaries.

 

 
| Dated:  December 15, 2009 |      /s/  Morton H. Kinzler  |   |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           | Name:  Morton H. Kinzler                              |   |
|                           | Title:  Chief Executive Officer                       |   |
|                           |                                                  |   |
|                           |                                                  |   |
| Dated:  December 15, 2009 |      /s/  Russell M. Gifford |   |
|                           | Name:  Russell M. Gifford                             |   |
|                           | Title:  Chief Financial Officer                       |   |

 

 

The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K oras a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of the writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

125

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

***Certification of the Principal ExecutiveOfficer and Principal Accounting and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Solera National Bancorp, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Paul M. Ferguson, President of the Company, and I, Robert J. Fenton, VicePresident, Secretary, & Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q,that we have reviewed the Form 10-Q and that to the best of our knowledge:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations as of thedate and for the periods covered by the Report.

 
| Date:  May 14, 2008 | /s/  Paul M. Ferguson                               |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                     | Paul  M. Ferguson                                   |
|                     | President                                           |
|                     | (Principal  Executive Officer)                      |
|                     |                                                |
|                     |                                                |
|                     | /s/  Robert J. Fenton                               |
|                     | Robert  J. Fenton                                   |
|                     | Vice  President, Secretary & Treasurer     |
|                     | (Principal  Accounting and Chief Financial Officer) |

 

----