alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      512,936
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     10,365
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         115,158
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        34,273
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  49,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 722,119
<COMMON>                                        45,025
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      103,126
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             86,227
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 234,378
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,917
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           229,500
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              51,625
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      229,500
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  18,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    5,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 196,699
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  722,119
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      473,581
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            16,979
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     431,877
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     448,856
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         24,725
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              19,179
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  43,904
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        17,842
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,062
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        288
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   25,774
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        20,988
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          44,540
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.91
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 202 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 202

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture in 
                  the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2019

  Mr. Peterson (for himself and Mr. Conaway) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture in 
                  the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture (hereafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the expenses of 
all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 
of the House of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 
not more than $12,451,130 for the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $6,225,565 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2019, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2020; and
            (2) not more than $6,225,565 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2020, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2021.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

MICHELLE BACKSTROM,

Appellant.

DIVISION ONE

No. 72406-1-

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: JUL 1 3 2019

Per Curiam — Michelle Backstrom appeals from the judgment and

sentence entered after she pleaded guilty to second degree murder. The State

concedes that Backstrom's prior conviction for vehicular homicide was incorrectly

scored as a violent offense, resulting in an erroneous offender score and

standard range. We accept the State's concession and remand for resentencing.

Remanded for resentencing.

FOR THE COURT: TKcAcy j<S

on

GC

CD

m
Exhibit 32.7
                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-G ("Issuer") for the period
ending  March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 18th day of May, 2007.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-G
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-G and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-G and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Maltby *v.*Graham *et al.*

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

May 22, 1888.)

Patents for Inventions—Infringement—Injunction.

Injunction granted to restrain the infringement of reissued letters patent No. 5,502, granted to George J. Capewell, July 29, 1873, for a nail extractor, the validity of this patent having been twice sustained, and defendant’s nail extractor being plainly an infringement.

In Equity. Bill for infringement of patent, brought by Douglass E. Maltby against John H. Graham and others. ' On motion for injunction.

*Francis*Forbes, for complainant.

*H. F. & Geo. H. Knight,*for defendants.

Lacombe, J.

This is an application to restrain the infringement of reissued letters patent No. 5,502, granted to George J. Capewell, July 29, 1873, for a nail extractor. The original patent was granted July 16, 1872. The patent has been twice sustained in this circuit. *Maltby*v. *Converse, Maltby*v. *Tool Co.*It is true that the Taft patent of 1870 (107,121) was not then before the court, but the Pish patent of 1866, (58,626,) which embodies the same principle, was then considered. The defendant’s nail extractor plainly infringes. Motion granted. The propositions which defendants seek to sustain amount to a rehearing of the two cases before Judges Wallace and Shipman, and may be presented at final hearing.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

________________________ No. ACM S323 96 (f rev)

________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Rashaad D. MICKENS Airman Basic (E

- 1 ) , U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 2 1 September 2017

________________________ Military Judge: James R. Dorman

. Approved sentence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 3 months, and a reprimand. S entence adjudged 2 March 2016 by SpCM convened at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska

. For Appellant: Major Travis L. Vaughan, USAF.
Before DREW
, JOHNSON, and MINK
, Appellate Military Judges

.

________________________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________ PE R CURIAM : We have this case for further review because the staff judge advocate originally erred in advising the c onvening authority that he could not disapprove the confinement portion of Appellant’s sentence , in whole or in part

. See United States v. Mickens, No. ACM S32396, 2017 CCA LEXIS 336 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 18 May 2017) (unpub. op.)

. Having resolved that issu e, we find the approvedfindings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice , 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).United States v. Mickens , No. ACM S323 96 (f rev)

2 Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

KURT J. BRUBAKER Clerk of the Court
Exhibit No. 23

** **

** **

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

TheBoard of DirectorsBarnwell Industries, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements No. 333-153070 and No. 333-88380 on Form S-8of Barnwell Industries, Inc. of our report dated December 15, 2009,with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Barnwell Industries, Inc.and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive(loss) income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year periodended September 30, 2009, which report appears in the September 30,2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Barnwell Industries, Inc.

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Honolulu,HawaiiDecember 15, 2009

 

122

----
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Boyd E. Hoback, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Good Times Restaurants Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

Boyd E. Hoback
*President and Chief Executive Officer*
August 9, 2006
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-B  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 20th day of November, 2006.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-B
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited Partnership  II-B and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-B and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*Wednesday, April 2, 1997*

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

96-1771.

#### State ex rel. Depriest v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 95APD05-587. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court *1446of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Leon R. Koziol, Individually and as Parent of Child A. and Child B., and on Behalf of Parents and Children Similarly Situated, Appellant, v Martha Walsh Hood, as Justice of the Supreme Court, et al., Respondents.

Decided June 7, 2012

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
Exhibit 32.1

mPhase Technologies, Ince CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald A. Durando, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronald A.
DurandoRonald A. Durando
     President and Chief Executive Officer
     February 13, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 118 (Monday, June 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14523]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, July 20, 2009, 8 a.m. to July 
21, 2009, 8 p.m., Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814 which was published in the Federal Register on May 18, 2009, 74 
FR 23193.
    This amendment is to cancel NCI SEP: IRG Subcommittee H--Clinical 
Cooperative Group. This meeting is being held as a regular Initial 
Review Group meeting and not a Special Emphasis Panel. Please see FR 
page 24859. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: June 10, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-14523 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #15-2006 (B) L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and


(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





By:
/s/ Freddie M. KotekName:
Freddie M. KotekTitle:
Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
August 13, 2009
#### LANDSMAN & FUNK PC, and all others similarly situated, Appellant v. SKINDER-STRAUSS ASSOCIATES, a New Jersey Partnership. Goodrich Management Corp., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Appellant v. AFGO Mechanical Services Inc., Goodrich Management Corp., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Appellant v. AFGO Mechanical Services Inc. Goodrich Management Corp., On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. Flierwire Inc. doing business as Schein Media Goodrich Management Corp., Appellant. Goodrich Management Corp., On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. Flierwire Inc. doing business as Schein Media Goodrich Management Corp., Appellant.

Nos. 09-3105, 09-3532, 09-3793.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

May 17, 2011.

Aytan Y. Beilin, Esq., Beilin & Associates, White Plains, NY, for Appellant.

Michael R. McDonald, Esq., Damian V. Santomauro, Esq., Gibbons, Newark, NJ, for Skinder-Strauss Associates.

Louis A. Bove, I, Esq., Jay M. Green, Esq., Bodell, Bove, Grace & Van Horn, Philadelphia, PA, Kristin Hitsous, Esq., Rosabianca & Associates, New York, NY, for Afgo Mechanical Services Inc., Goodrich Management Corp.

David J. Bloch, Esq., L’Abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, Livingston, NJ, for Flierwire Inc.

Present: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, BARRY, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR. VANASKIE and GARTH *, Circuit Judges.

*

 Judge Garth's vote is limited to panel rehearing only.

ORDER

THEODORE A. McKEE, Chief Circuit Judge.

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above consolidated appeals, it is ordered that the petitions for rehearing are GRANTED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-41243

BRUCE M. ANDERSON, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

ROGELIO VALDEZ, In his Individual and Official Capacities, 

 Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GRAVES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Anderson notes that after we issued our decision, Gregory Perkes was 

nominated by the Governor to once again serve as a justice on the Thirteenth 

Court of Appeals. This relates “to changed circumstances since the case was 

decided by the district court” and by our panel, which do not provide grounds 

for panel rehearing.1 Our decision and denial of rehearing are “[w]ithout 

 

1 Anastasiadis v. S.S. Little John, 347 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1965) (mem.); see also 

Armster v. U.S. Dist. Court, 806 F.2d 1347, 1356 (9th Cir. 1986) (“A panel is simply not 

capable of having overlooked or misapprehended ‘points of . . . fact’ occurring subsequent to 

its initial decision.”); 16AA Fed. Prac. & Proc. Juris. § 3986.1 (4th ed.) (“New factual material, 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 19, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 17-41243

2

prejudice to [the] pursuit of any appropriate remedies which may be available 

in the district court.”2 We express no opinion on the availability of further relief 

in the context of the close professional relationship between judge and staff

attorney.

The petition for panel rehearing is denied.

 

including material concerning events occurring after the initial decision, is not likely to be 

considered [in a petition for panel rehearing].”).

2 Anastasiadis, 347 F.2d at 823.