alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 188 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 188

    Expressing support for designation of July as National Sarcoma 
                            Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2019

  Mr. Duffy (for himself and Ms. Jackson Lee) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing support for designation of July as National Sarcoma 
                            Awareness Month.

Whereas sarcoma is a cancer of connective tissues, such as nerves, muscles, 
        joints, fat, bones, and blood vessels, and it can arise anywhere in the 
        body;
Whereas 15,000 people in the United States were diagnosed with sarcoma last 
        year, more than 6,000 died, and 50,000 are struggling with the disease 
        at any one time;
Whereas 1 percent of cancers diagnosed in adults and 20 percent of cancers 
        diagnosed in children each year are sarcoma;
Whereas more than 50 subtypes of sarcoma have been identified;
Whereas the National Cancer Institute recognizes that sarcoma is often 
        misdiagnosed and underreported; and
Whereas July would be an appropriate month to designate as National Sarcoma 
        Awareness Month to raise awareness of the disease and encourage more 
        individuals to get properly diagnosed and treated: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of National Sarcoma Awareness Month.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                             BKF CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of BKF Capital Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Clarke Gray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 (including subsections (a) (b) and (c) thereof), as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                   /s/ J. CLARKE GRAY
                                                 -----------------------
                                                      J. Clarke Gray
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

March 16, 2006
EXHIBIT 23.2Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmTheBoard of DirectorsPLIVA d.d.:We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.33-73696, 33-73698, 333-17349, 333-17351, 333-50356, 333-75388, 333-75390,333-102070, 333-102072 and 333-144210 on Form S-8 of Barr Pharmaceuticals,Inc., formerly Barr Laboratories, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2007, withrespect to the consolidated balance sheet of PLIVA d.d. (a subsidiary of BarrPharmaceuticals, Inc.) as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows forthe period from October 25, 2006 through December 31, 2006, before the effectsof any retrospective adjustments for the discontinued operations, which reportappears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for theyear ended December 31, 2007./s/ KPMG Hungária Kft.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
GLADGER

R OSS, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt,
v. ANGEL ORTIZ; M A TTHEW B R OW N, De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-56662 D.C . No. 5:10-c v-01606-SJO-JPR
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia S. Jam e s Ote ro, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 5, 2014 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, M c KEOW N, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. Form e r fe de ra l prisone r Gla dge r R oss a ppe a l s pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s sum m ary judgm e nt in his ac tion a

rising unde r B iv e ns v . Six Unk now n N ame d Age nts of Fe de ral Bure au of N arc otic s , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), a lle g ing de libe rate indiffe re nc e to his se rious m e dic a l ne e ds. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C
. § 

# F IL ED DEC 12 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).1291. W e re vie wde novo, Toguc hi v . C hung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th C ir. 2004), a nd we a ffirm
. The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt be c a

use R o ss fa ile d to ra ise a ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r de fe nda

nts we re de libe ra t e ly

indiffe re nt to his wrist frac ture . Se e id. at 1057-60 (a prison offic ia l
a c ts with de libe ra te indiffe re nc e only if he or she knows of a

n d disre ga

rds a n e xc e ssive risk to a

prisone r’ s he a lth; ne glige nc e and a m e re diffe re n c e in m e dic a l opinion a re insuffic ie n t); se e also Mc Guc k in v . Smith , 974 F.2d 1050, 1060 (9th C ir. 1992), ov e rrule d on othe r grounds by W MX Te c hs., Inc . v . Mille r , 104 F.3d 1133 (9th C ir. 1997) (e n ba n c ) (“ A de fe nda

nt m ust purpose fully

ignore or fa il to
re spond to a

prisone r’ s pa i n or possible m e d ic a l ne e d

in orde r for de l ibe rate indiffe re nc e to be e s ta

blishe d.” ). W e do not c onside r the c onte ntions in the re ply brie f c o nc e rning Dr. R e dix’ s sta te m e nts to Ross a fte r his wrist surgery or a ny othe r c onte ntion tha

t wa s not pre s e nte d to the distric t c ourt. Se e Unite d State s. v . Elias , 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th C ir. 1990) (“ Doc um e nts or fa c ts not pre se nte d to thedistric t c ourt a re not pa rt of the re c ord on a

ppe a l.” ). AFFIRM E D.

2 1 3
- 5 6 6 6 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ITRONICS
INC. FORM 10-QSB FOR MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,362,502
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  198,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,900
<INVENTORY>                                    215,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,015,216
<PP&E>                                       3,336,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                 351,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,401,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          712,157
<BONDS>                                      3,669,616
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        72,961
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,917,230
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,401,964
<SALES>                                         92,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               281,638
<CGS>                                          165,594
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  331,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                98,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,560
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (804,750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (804,750)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (804,750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.011)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.011)


</TABLE>
#### United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company et al., Respondents, v American Re-Insurance Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted June 18, 2012;

decided June 26, 2012

Motion by Reinsurance Association of America for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 19 copies filed within seven days.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50859 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JERRY THOMAS MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-95-CA-145

- - - - - - - - - - November 6, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jerry Thomas Maxwell appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court did not commit reversible error in rejecting Maxwell’s due process argument, which raises a factual issue concerning the amount of cocaine attributable to him. This issue was decided against him by this court in United States v. Thomas , 12 F.3d 1350 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 1861 (1994). SeeNo. 95-50859 - 2 - United States v. Kalish , 780 F.2d 506, 508 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 476 U.S. 1118 (1986). Nor did the district court err in rejecting Maxwell’s contention that his counsel was ineffective for failing to require the district court to resolve disputed factual issues at the sentencing hearing. See Spriggs v. Collins , 993 F.2d 85, 88 (5th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32

 

ITRONICS INC.

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Itronics Inc. (the Company") on Form10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on November 10, 2005 (the "Report") each of the undersigned, in thecapacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: November 8, 2005                          /S/ JOHN W. WHITNEY
                                                John W. Whitney

                                                President 

Date: November 8, 2005                         /S/ MICHAEL C. HORSLEY
                                               Michael C. Horsley

                                               Controller

34
EXHIBIT 21 - LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES*



|(a) | Bassett Furniture Industries of North Carolina, LLC. (North Carolina limited liability Corporation )
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | The E.B. Malone Corporation (Delaware Corporation)
|--- | --------------------------------------------------



|(c) | Bassett Direct Stores, LLC. (Virginia limited liability Corporation)
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



|(d) | Bassett Direct NC, LLC (Virginia limited liability company)
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------



|(e) | Bassett Direct SC, LLC (Virginia limited liability company)
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------



|(f) | The Accessories Group, Inc. (Virginia Corporation)
|--- | --------------------------------------------------



|(g) | Bassett Industries Alternative Asset Fund, L.P. (99.8% ownership) (Delaware limited partnership)
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(h) | LRG Furniture, LLC (Virginia limited liability company)
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------



|(i) | BDP, LC (Texas limited liability company)
|--- | -----------------------------------------



|(j) | BFD-Atlanta, LLC (Virginia limited liability company)
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------



|(k) | BD Boston, LLC (Virginia limited liability corporation)
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------



|(l) | BDU NY, LLC (Virginia limited liability company)
|--- | ------------------------------------------------



|* | All subsidiaries are wholly-owned unless otherwise noted.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3000 

To extend the increase in the FMAP provided in the American Recovery 

and Reinvestment Act of 2009 for an additional 6 months. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2010 

Mr. ROCKEFELLER (for himself, Mr. REID, Mr. KERRY, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. 

FRANKEN, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. DURBIN, 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. REED, Mr. DODD, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. 

LEAHY, Mr. KIRK, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. CASEY, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BURRIS, 

Mrs. BOXER, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. 

JOHNSON, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. KAUFMAN, Mr. WYDEN, 

Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. MERKLEY, Ms. CANTWELL, and Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the increase in the FMAP provided in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 for an 

additional 6 months. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ARRA INCREASE IN FMAP. 

4 Section 5001 of the American Recovery and Reinvest5 ment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–5) is amended— 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 3000 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ‘‘first cal2 endar quarter’’ and inserting ‘‘first 3 calendar quar3 ters’’; 

4 (2) in subsection (c)— 

5 (A) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ‘‘July 

6 1, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2011’’; 

7 (B) in paragraph (3)(B)(i), by striking 

8 ‘‘July 1, 2010’’ each place it appears and in9 serting ‘‘January 1, 2011’’; and 

10 (C) in paragraph (4)(C)(ii), by striking 

11 ‘‘the 3-consecutive-month period beginning with 

12 January 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘any 3-consecu13 tive-month period that begins after December 

14 2009 and ends before January 2011’’; 

15 (3) in subsection (g)— 

16 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Sep17 tember 30, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘March 31, 

18 2012’’; and 

19 (B) in paragraph (2)— 

20 (i) by inserting ‘‘of such Act’’ after 

21 ‘‘1923’’; and 

22 (ii) by adding at the end the following 

23 new sentence: ‘‘Voluntary contributions by 

24 a political subdivision to the non-Federal 

25 share of expenditures under the State 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 3000 IS

1 Medicaid plan or to the non-Federal share 

2 of payments under section 1923 of the So3 cial Security Act shall not be considered to 

4 be required contributions for purposes of 

5 this section.’’; and 

6 (4) in subsection (h)(3), by striking ‘‘December 

7 31, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2011’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Media Contact:

Interior_Press@ios.doi.gov

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Secretary Haaland Announces Appointments to National Indian Gaming 

Commission

WASHINGTON, D.C. March 25, 2024 – Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland today announced the 

proposed appointments of Sharon Avery and Jeannie Hovland as Associate Commissioners to the National Indian 

Gaming Commission.

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act established the three-person National Indian Gaming Commission in 1988 to 

support and promote Tribal economic development, self-sufficiency, and strong Tribal governments through the 

operation of gaming on Indian lands. The Commission’s Chair is appointed by the President and its two Associate 

Commissioners are appointed by the Secretary of the Interior. All Commission members serve three-year terms.

"The Biden-Harris administration is committed to ensuring that Tribes have the resources they need to exercise 

their Tribal sovereignty and support their communities," said Secretary Deb Haaland. "Not only does gaming 

support Tribal economies, but the funding it generates also helps to support the vital services that Tribal Nations 

provide to their citizens — from language preservation to healthcare. Today’s appointments to the National Indian 

Gaming Commission will help ensure we continue to provide resources and support for an industry that remains 

one of the most significant sources of economic development in Indian Country."

Sharon Avery is an enrolled member of the Saginaw Chippewa Tribe of Michigan. She currently serves as an 

Associate General Counsel for the National Indian Gaming Commission’s Office of General Counsel. In this role 

she has gained familiarity with the agency’s structure and the important role the agency plays within the Tribal 

gaming industry. Prior to joining the National Indian Gaming Commission, Ms. Avery worked in the Legal 

Department of the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan for 10 years. She graduated from Michigan State 

University College of Law with a Juris Doctor degree and a certificate from the Indigenous Law and Policy Center.

Jeannie Hovland is an enrolled member of the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota and currently serves 

as Vice Chair of the National Indian Gaming Commission. Since joining the Commission, she has worked 

collaboratively to consult with Tribes for the promulgation of regulations and to coordinate the agency's regulatory 

responsibilities with Tribal regulatory authorities. Prior to joining the Commission, Ms. Hovland served as 

Commissioner of the Administration for Native Americans and Deputy Assistant Secretary for Native American 

Affairs at the Department of Health and Human Services and held roles at the Interior Department as well as in the 

office of South Dakota Senator John Thune.

Appointments to the Commission can be finalized following a required 30-day public comment period. Information 

on how to comment and full biographies of the appointees can be found in the accompanying Federal Register 

notice.
Document



July 6, 2022


Matthew Field


Re:    Relocation Assistance


Dear Matt:


As you know, on June 29, 2022, Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Joby Aviation, Inc. (the “Company”) approved a relocation assistance package to incentivize you to permanently relocate to a location within 50 miles of the Company’s Santa Cruz, San Carlos or Marina, California office locations (a “Qualifying Residence”).  The relocation assistance consists of two separate components.  First, the Company will advance you $200,000 to be used for the down-payment on a Qualifying Residence (the “Down Payment Assistance”). The Down Payment Assistance shall be payable to you upon acceptance by the seller of your offer to purchase a Qualifying Residence and shall be subject to all applicable taxes and withholdings. If the purchase is not completed, you agree to repay the Down Payment Assistance to the Company within 30 days of the  purchase contract being cancelled or rescinded. In addition, the Down Payment Assistance will be subject to pro rata repayment obligation if you voluntarily resign or are terminated for Cause (as defined in the Company’s 2021 Equity Incentive Plan) within 3 years from the date you receive the Down Payment Assistance.


In addition, effective as of the Company’s July 8, 2022 payroll, you will receive an additional $100,000 per annum in cash compensation (the “Geographic Differential Compensation”), subject to all applicable taxes and withholdings. The Geographic Differential Compensation will terminate if you cease to rent or own a Qualifying Residence. Additionally, the Geographic Differential Compensation will be annually reviewed by the Committee and may be terminated by the Committee at any time in its sole discretion. For the avoidance of doubt, the Geographic Differential Compensation shall not be considered as part of your base salary for the purpose of calculating bonus, equity or other compensation.


This letter agreement is not a promise of continued employment and your employment relationship with the Company continues to be “at will” meaning that either you or the Company may terminate your employment at any time and for any reason.


Sincerely,


Joby Aero, Inc.




_/s/ Kate DeHoff_______________
Kate DeHoff
General Counsel and Secretary




Agreed and accepted,






   /s/ Matthew Field        
Matthew Field


2155 Delaware Street, Suite 225, Santa Cruz, CA 95060  |  (831) 201-6700  |  (831) 426-5666 FAX  |  jobyaviation.com
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apogent Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank H. Jellinek, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    FRANK H. JELLINEK,
JR.Frank H. Jellinek, Jr. Chief Executive Officer February 13, 2004




This certification accompanies
this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
97-476.

#### State ex rel. King v. Indus. Comm.

In Procedendo and Prohibition. On motion to dismiss of Industrial Commission of Ohio and on motion to dismiss of Toledo Stamping and Manufacturing Company. Motions to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

*1488Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., dissents and would grant the writs.