alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Boyd E. Hoback, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Good Times Restaurants Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

/s/ Boyd E. Hoback

Boyd E. Hoback
*President and Chief Executive Officer*
May 14, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jesse Abner, Appellant.

Submitted April 15, 2013;

decided April 25, 2013

Motion for poor person relief granted.
#### George Bundy Smith, Sr., Individually and on Behalf of Twenty Plus Members of Grace Congregational Church of Harlem, Inc./United Church of Christ, Appellant, v United Church of Christ et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 9, 2012;

decided June 27, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal etc. dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain it *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3; CPLR 5602).
#### In the Matter of the Guardianship of Kevin Z., a Person Alleged to be Mentally Retarded and/or Developmentally Disabled. Carmella AA., Respondent; Edward Z., Appellant. (And Another Proceeding.)

Submitted June 17, 2013;

decided August 27, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 342 

To provide for the treatment of service as a member of the Alaska Territorial 

Guard during World War II as active service for purposes of retired 

pay for members of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2009 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself, Mr. BEGICH, and Mr. INOUYE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for the treatment of service as a member of 

the Alaska Territorial Guard during World War II as 

active service for purposes of retired pay for members 

of the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT AS ACTIVE SERVICE FOR RETIRED 

4 PAY PURPOSES OF SERVICE AS A MEMBER OF 

5 THE ALASKA TERRITORIAL GUARD DURING 

6 WORLD WAR II. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Service as a member of the Alas8 ka Territorial Guard during World War II of any indiVerDate Nov 24 2008 07:20 Jan 29, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S342.IS S342

smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 342 IS

1 vidual who was honorably discharged therefrom under sec2 tion 8147 of the Department of Defense Appropriations 

3 Act, 2001 (Public Law 106–259; 114 Stat. 705) shall be 

4 treated as active service for purposes of the computation 

5 under chapter 71, 371, or 1223 of title 10, United States 

6 Code, as applicable, of the retired pay to which such indi7 vidual may be entitled under title 10, United States Code. 

8 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall apply with 

9 respect to amounts of retired pay payable under title 10, 

10 United States Code, for months beginning on or after Au11 gust 9, 2000. No retired pay shall be paid to any indi12 vidual by reason of subsection (a) for any period before 

13 that date. 

14 (c) WORLD WAR II DEFINED.—In this section, the 

15 term ‘‘World War II’’ has the meaning given that term 

16 in section 101(8) of title 38, United States Code. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### Morrison Cohen, LLP, Respondent, v David Fink, Appellant.

Submitted July 23, 2012;

decided September 13, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 112 (Friday, June 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13719]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Announcement of the Priority Grant Competition; Effective 
Immediately

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency announces its ongoing Priority Grant Competition. 
The Priority Grant Competition focuses on seven countries as they 
relate to USIP's mandate. The Priority Grant Competition is restricted 
to projects that fit specific themes or topics identified for each 
country.
    The seven Priority Grant Competition countries are outlined below. 
The specific themes and topics for each country may be found at our Web 
site at: http://www.usip.org/grants/priority_grantmaking.html.
    <bullet> Afghanistan.
    <bullet> Colombia.
    <bullet> Iran.
    <bullet> Iraq.
    <bullet> Nigeria.
    <bullet> Pakistan.
    <bullet> Sudan.
    Deadline: The Priority Grant Competition applications are accepted 
throughout the year and awards are announced throughout the year. 
Please visit our Web site at: http://www.usip.org/grants/priority_grantmaking.html for specific information on the competition as well as 
instructions about how to apply.

ADDRESSES: If you are unable to access our Web site, you may submit an 
inquiry to: United States Institute of Peace, Grant Program, Priority 
Grant Competition, 1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 
20036-3011; (202) 429-3842 (phone), (202) 833-1018 (fax), (202) 457-
1719 (TTY), E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a1d081b140e093a0f09130a5415081d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d2a3f2c23393e0d383e243d63223f2a">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Grant Program, Phone (202) 429-
3842, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#791e0b18170d0a390c0a100957160b1e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="264154474852556653554f5608495441">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 8, 2009.
Michael Graham,
Vice President for Management.
[FR Doc. E9-13719 Filed 6-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 2-56066, 2-85158, 33-15439, 33-35667, 333-03611, 333-18057, 333-75924, 333-75922, and 333-75920), Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-90468 and 333-110094), and Form S-3/A (No. 333-110094) of Bausch & Lomb Incorporated of our report dated January 26, 2004 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Rochester, NY
March 8, 2004
Exhibit
32.1





Certifications
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Houston Wire & Cable
Company (the “Corporation”) for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Charles A. Sorrentino, as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
and Nicol G. Graham, as Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best


of his
knowledge, that:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
  Corporation.








Date:   November
      10, 2008
                  /s/ Charles A.
SorrentinoCharles
      A. SorrentinoChief
      Executive OfficerDate:   November
      10, 2008
                  /s/ Nicol G. GrahamNicol
      G. GrahamChief
      Financial Officer








This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed


by
Houston Wire & Cable Company for purposes of section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Upcoming Observances and Related Events

This calendar includes health observances and other events related to mental health that you can use to join the conversation and help raise awareness about mental illnesses.

**Let us know what types of resources or topics would better help you connect with and educate your community.**Email your suggestions to NIMHOutreach@mail.nih.gov.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 278 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 278

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives to recognize the 
                crisis of violence against Native women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2019

 Ms. Moore (for herself, Ms. Haaland, Ms. Davids of Kansas, Mr. Young, 
 Mr. Grijalva, and Mr. Cole) submitted the following resolution; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives to recognize the 
                crisis of violence against Native women.

Whereas according to a study commissioned by the Department of Justice, in some 
        Tribal communities, American Indian women face murder rates that are 
        more than 10 times the national average;
Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, homicide 
        was the third-leading cause of death among American Indian and Alaska 
        Native women between 10 and 24 years of age and the fifth-leading cause 
        of death for American Indian and Alaska Native women between 25 and 34 
        years of age;
Whereas Native women face some of the highest levels of violence of any group, 
        but there is little data that exists on the number of missing American 
        Indian and Alaska Native women in the United States;
Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives are 2.5 times more likely to 
        experience violent crimes and at least 2 times more likely to experience 
        rape or sexual assault crimes than people who are not American Indians 
        or Alaska Natives;
Whereas 96 percent of female and 89 percent of male American Indian and Alaska 
        Native victims report being victimized by a non-Indian;
Whereas according to a 2010 Government Accountability Office report, the Offices 
        of the United States Attorneys declined to prosecute nearly 52 percent 
        of violent crimes that occur in Indian country;
Whereas Indian Tribes report that children are usually involved in domestic 
        violence and dating violence incidents that occur on Indian lands, 
        either as witnesses or as victims themselves;
Whereas the Indian Law and Order Commission issued a report entitled ``A Roadmap 
        for Making Native America Safer'', which recommends the restoration of 
        the inherent authority of Tribal courts; and
Whereas Tribal communities should be able to protect themselves from dating 
        violence, domestic violence, and child violence, and from violence 
        committed against members of the Tribal justice system: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses the sense of 
the House to recognize the crisis of violence against Native women.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Federal Maritime Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

June 24, 2009—10 a.m.

# PLACE:

800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

The meeting will be in Open Session.

## Matters To Be Considered

### Open Session

1. Docket No. 02-15 Passenger Vessel Financial Responsibility.

                    2.                     *FMC Agreement No. 201201:*                     Port of Seattle/Terminal Operator Agreement.                

3. Marine Terminal Agreements Exemption at 46 CFR 535.308.

4. FY 2009 Budget Status Update.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.

Karen V. Gregory,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-14575 Filed 6-17-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### Gerald CODERRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edwar PESANTI, MD; Edward Blanchette, MD; Dr. Germain Bianchi; E. White, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees, *95John Doe, I/O, Defendant.

No. 05-5403-pr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 20, 2006.

Gerald Coderre, pro se, Norwalk, CT, for Appellant.

Anne E. Lynch, Assistant Attorney General, State of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, for Defendants-Appellees.

PRESENT: JOSÉ A. CABRANES, CHESTER J. STRAUB, PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Gerald Coderre appeals *pro se*from an order of the District Court, *Coderre v. Pesanti*3:02-CV-1096, 2005 WL 2481453, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22787 (D.Conn. Sept. 30, 2005), which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiffs complaint. Plaintiff initially alleged a violation of his Eighth Amendment rights by medical personnel at the Connecticut Department of Corrections on the grounds that he requested and was denied Interferon treatment for hepatitis.

To substantiate an Eighth Amendment claim for medical indifference, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant was deliberately indifferent to a serious medical need. *See Farmer v. Brennan,*511 U.S. 825, 834-35, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994). The deliberate indifference standard is comprised of an objective and subjective component. “Objectively, the alleged deprivation must be sufficiently serious, in the sense that a condition of urgency, one that may produce death, degeneration or extreme pain exists.” *Hathaway v. Coughlin,*99 F.3d 550, 553 (2d Cir.1996) (internal quotation marks omitted). “Subjectively, the charged official must act with a sufficiently culpable state of mind,” *id.*(internal quotation marks omitted), meaning “something more than mere negligence,” and akin to criminal recklessness, *see id.*

Upon a review of the record, we conclude that plaintiff has not raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether he had a serious medical need, *Farmer,*511 U.S. at 835, 114 S.Ct. 1970, for the treatment he requested, and that the evidence proffered by plaintiff supports, at most, a showing of negligence, and not one of “deliberate indifference” as is required to support an Eighth Amendment claim, *id.; see Bender v. Regier,*385 F.3d 1133, 1137 (8th Cir.2004) (holding that although “[a hepatitis] infection is unquestionably a serious problem, the Eighth Amendment issue is not whether the infection itself is a serious medical need, but rather whether [the prisoner] had a serious medical need for prompt interferon treatment.”) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court, substantially for the reasons provided by Judge Chatigny in his Ruling and Order of September 30, 2005, *Coderre,*2005 WL 2481453, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22787.
#### Jancis L. FULLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John J. ARMSTRONG, Eileen P. Higgins, Warden, Steven Henchy, Dentist, Paul Bernard, Dentist, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-6720-pr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 13, 2006.

*988Jancis L. Fuller, pro se, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Madeline A. Melchionne, Assistant Attorney General, for Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General, for Defendants-Appellants.

Present: ROGER J. MINER, ROSEMARY S. POOLER and ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Jancis L. Fuller (“Fuller”) appeals from a December 2, 2004, decision of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Chatigny, J.), granting defendants-appellees’ motion for summary judgment. *See Fuller v. Armstrong,*No. 00-cv-0812, 2004 WL 2808700 (D.Conn. Dec.2, 2004). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal.

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. *See Steel Partners II, L.P. v. Bell Indus., Inc.,*315 F.3d 120, 123 (2d Cir.2002). Summary judgment is appropriate where, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, the record shows that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. *Id.*In addition, we construe the pleadings of a pro se plaintiff liberally and interpret them to raise the strongest arguments that they suggest. *McPherson v. Coombe,*174 F.3d 276, 280 (2d Cir.1999). To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation of medical treatment in violation of the Eighth Amendment, Fuller must show that defendants acted with “deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.” *Estelle v. Gamble, 429*U.S. 97, 104, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976).

We conclude that no issue of material fact has been raised with respect to Fuller’s claim that defendants acted with deliberate indifference to her need for dental care. Fuller acknowledges that she received care within weeks of her initial request for treatment. Fuller subsequently refused dental care on at least two occasions. The district court therefore properly concluded that defendants did not act with deliberate indifference to her serious medical needs.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 31 , 2018
.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00952

- CV
IN RE DARLA JALANE E DDINS , Relator
Original Proceeding from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 13

- 23371


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Boatright Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and relator’s notice of

settlement . In the notice of settlement, relator states that the parties have settled the underlying dispute and, as such, this o riginal proceeding is now moot. We treat the notice of settlement as a

moti on to dismiss this proceeding. We dismiss this proceeding in accordance with the motion of

relator

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

180952F.P05 /Jason Boatright/ JASON BOATRIGHT JUSTICE
#     Find NINDS Clinical Trials  

#### Pagination

-  « FirstFirst page 
-  ‹ PreviousPrevious page 
-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-  4 
-  5 
-  6 
-  7 
-  8 
-  9 
-  Next ›Next page 
-  Last »Last page
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00 027
- C R

Blair Beck McCall , Appellant

v. The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR
- 15
- 0868 , THE HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

On March 10, 2021, the Court of Criminal Appeals issued Ortiz v. State , Nos. PD

- 1061

- 19, PD

- 1362

- 18,

__ S.W.3d __, 2021 WL 900673 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 10, 2021) (op., designated for publication). This Court requests supplemental briefing from the parties

on what effect, if any, Ortiz ’s analysis has on our disposition of appellant’s motion for rehearing and of this appeal. A ppellant should file his brief no later than April 8 , 2021. The State’s response
will be due within 14 days of the filing of a ppellant’s brief.
It is so ordered March 2 5 , 2021.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker , and Kelly
Do Not Publish