alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M ARI A A ZUCE NA BE NA VI DEZ, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 70055 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 064- 324 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay14, 2013 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T H O M A S , an dM U R G U IA , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M ari a A zu cen a B en av i d ez, a n at i v e an dci t i zen o f M ex i co , p et i t i o n s p ro se for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng her mo t i o n t o r e o p e n r e mo v a lp r o c e e d i n g s . O u rj u r i s d i c t i o n i s g o v e rn e db y8 U . S. C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f

o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f a m o tio n to r e o p e n . 

# FI LED MA Y22 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 70055 2 Mo h a m m ed

v. G o n za les, 400 F . 3d 785, 791 ( 9th C i r . 2005) . W e de nyi n partand d i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g B e n av id e z ’s m o tio n to r e ope n w he r e B e na vi de z f a i l e d t o s ubm i tanyne w l ya va i l abl e , m a t e r i a l e vi de nc e of h ar d s h ip . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (1). C on traryt o B enavi dez’ s a ss ert i on s i n h er m ot i on t o r e ope n, no m e di c a l e vi de nc e r e l e vantt o the har ds hi p t o he rqua l i f y i ng r e la tiv e s w a s s ub m itte dw ith h e rm o tio n . T h e B I A a ls o d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g B e n av id e z ’s m o tio n to r e ope n on the gr ound tha ts he w a i ve d he ra l l e ga t i ons of i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e of c o u n s e l. Se e To q u e r o v . I NS , 9 5 6 F .2 d1 9 3 , 1 9 6 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 2 ) . W e l ackj u ri sd i ct i o n t o co n si d er B en av i d ez’ s co n t en t i o n th ath er case w arr an ts af

a v o r ab le e x e r c is e o f

p r o s e c u to r ia l d is c r e tio n . See V i lchi z- So to v. H o lder, 6 8 8 F .3 d6 4 2 , 6 4 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 2 ) ( o r d e r ) . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 10, 2014

No. 04-14-00705-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.A.T.,

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-02779

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The 

appellant’s brief is due on December 17, 2014.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DARYL JAMES BRYANT, 

Appellant, 

v.

Case No. 5D21-2592

LT Case No. 2018-CF-003674-A 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed September 13, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Marion County, 

Steven G. Rogers, Judge. 

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and 

Robert J. Pearce, III, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock 

McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

WALLIS, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      99.2**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB of
      Mortlock Ventures Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended December 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
      I, Michael Laidlaw, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.








Date: 
      Janaury 15, 2008





MICHAEL
      LAIDLAW


Michael
      Laidlaw


Chief
      Executive Officer,


President
      and Director








-1-
#### ROSENBLUM v. DINGFELDER et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

July 7, 1941.

See, also, D.C., 1 F.R.D. 179.

Bernard Gordon, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Harry Weinberger, of New York City, for defendant.

KNOX, District Judge.

Before plaintiff is required to throw open to the inspection of defendant “all of the books, ledgers, records, accounts sales of the two assignor corporations, and accounts sales, letters, telegrams in his possession, which plaintiff intends to use on the trial” the defendant, in conformity with Federal Rules of Procedure, rule 34, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, should, showing good cause therefor, formally move for this relief. When this shall have been done, the Court will be in better position than at present to pass upon the merits of the application.
### NUMBER 13
- 12
- 00 082
- CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

ROGER POMPA , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

.

On appeal from the 214 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Roger Pompa , attempts to appeal his conviction for possession of a

controlled substance . The trial court has certified that this A is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. @ See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2).2

On January 30, 2012 , this Court notified appellant = s counsel of the trial court = s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determ ine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel = s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.
On February 14, 2012 , counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel = s response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure pro vide that an appeal must be
dismissed if the trial court = s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 1st day of March , 20 12

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, P30 Competitive Revisions I.                    

*Date:*                         August 6, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Gail J. Bryant, Medical Officer, Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8111, MSC 8328, Bethesda, MD 20852-8328, (301) 402-0801,                         *gb30t@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 10, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-14521 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 216 

Expressing support for designation of March 2019 as Music in Our Schools 

Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2019 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself and Ms. NORTON) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of March 2019 as Music 

in Our Schools Month. 

Whereas music has been present in every known human culture throughout history and modern times; 

Whereas music is one of the most important manifestations 

of our cultural heritage, as it embodies our national identity and illustrates our shared history; 

Whereas music education helps communities share ideas and 

values among cultures and generations, promoting a more 

cooperative and inclusive citizenry; 

Whereas singing has existed in American classrooms since before the signing of the Declaration of Independence; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 216 IH 

Whereas, in 1838, music as its own curriculum was first 

adopted by public authority in the public schools of Boston, Massachusetts; 

Whereas the development of a musical people has been and 

remains dependent on a public commitment to the teaching of music in all schools; 

Whereas State legislatures and educational agencies have 

supported music as part of the regular school curriculum; 

Whereas the Every Student Succeeds Act identified music as 

part of a well-rounded education; 

Whereas music is a means for exploring the emotional and 

aesthetic dimensions of the human experience; 

Whereas music holds intrinsic value as an art form, providing 

opportunity for self-expression, fellowship, and spiritual 

fulfillment; 

Whereas research has documented that participation in school 

music promotes student engagement, leading to improved 

social and academic outcomes, particularly for at-risk 

students; 

Whereas research has documented that participation in school 

music also promotes cognitive, social, and emotional development, exercising skills valuable to the workforce 

such as motivation, attentiveness, self-discipline, teamwork, persistence, empathy, respect, and leadership; and 

Whereas racial minorities and students who are of low-socioeconomic backgrounds are less likely to have access to a 

high-quality music education: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of Music in Our Schools Month and recog3 nizes— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 216 IH 

1 (1) the fundamental importance of music to the 

2 Nation’s culture; 

3 (2) the long history of music as an integral part 

4 of the Nation’s schools; 

5 (3) the disparate access to high-quality music 

6 education that exists across the country; and 

7 (4) the need to do more to support the teaching 

8 and learning of music in public schools. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Donald Rozz, Appellant, v Nassau County Department of Assessment et al., Respondents.

Decided October 23, 2012

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2023

- 0879

_____________________________
J UAN C ARLOS G ARCIA , Appellant,

v.

F LORIDA C OMMISSION ON O FFENDER R EVIEW , et al.,

Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. J. Lee Marsh , Judge

. April 30, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , R OBERTS , and R OWE , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Juan Carlos Garcia, pro se
, Appellant.

Rana M. Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark J. Hiers, Deputy General Counsel, Tallahassee
, for Appellee s

.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

> (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
> 
> (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
> 
> (3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.

|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation                        
|------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|       | General Partner                                                  
|       |                                                                  
|       |                                                                  
|       | /S/ Brenda G. Gujral                                             
|       |                                                                  
|Name:  | Brenda G. Gujral                                                 
|Title: | President of the General Partner and                             
|       | principal executive officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P
|Date:  | May 14, 2004
#### In the Matter of Ben Gary Treistman, Appellant, v Suzanne Mary Cayley, Respondent.

Decided February 12, 2013

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that it does not lie *(see*CPLR 5601).

Judge Rivera taking no part.
Exhibit
10.87


 


SECOND
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF SALE AND PURCHASE


 


THIS
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF SALE AND PURCHASE (this “Second Amendment”) is made as of August 2, 2022, by and
between AIM IMMUNOTECH INC., a Delaware corporation (“Seller”), and ACELLORIES, INC., a New York corporation (“Buyer”).


 


WHEREAS,
Seller and Buyer have executed that certain Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated March 3, 2022, as amended by a First Amendment to Agreement
of Sale and Purchase dated June 27, 2022 (collectively, the “Purchase Agreement”) for the purchase of certain Property,
as defined in the Purchase Agreement, situate in the City of Brunswick, Middlesex County, New Jersey and commonly known as 783 Jersey
Avenue; and


 


WHEREAS,
Seller and Buyer now desire to make certain amendments to the Purchase Agreement, upon and subject to the terms and conditions of this
Second Amendment.


 


NOW
THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the mutual promises hereinafter set forth, and intending to be legally bound, hereby
agree as follows:


 


1.
The Closing Date is hereby extended to August 31, 2022, subject to Seller’s right to further extend the Closing date as set forth
in Section 4(b) of the Purchase Agreement.


 


2.
All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Purchase Agreement. This Second Amendment
may be signed in counterpart(s). For purposes of this Second Amendment, facsimile or electronic signatures shall constitute original
signatures. The transmission of a signed counterpart of this Second Amendment by electronic signature, facsimile or by portable document
file shall have the same force and effect as delivery of an original signed counterpart of this Second Amendment, and shall constitute
valid and effective delivery for all purposes. Except as expressly modified hereby, and in all respects, the remainder of the Purchase
Agreement is hereby ratified and shall continue in full force and effect without modification. Nothing in this Second Amendment shall
be construed as, or otherwise effect, a waiver of any right, remedy, power or privilege of Seller or Buyer under the Purchase Agreement,
all of which are expressly reserved.


 


[Signatures
on Following Page]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


 


	 	Seller:
	 	 
	 	AIM
    IMMUNOTECH INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/Peter
    W. Rodino
	 	Name:	Peter
    W. Rodino
	 	Title:	C.O.O.
	 	 	 
	 	Buyer:
	 	 
	 	ACELLORIES,
    INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/Albert
    Lalou
	 	Name:	Albert
    Lalou
	 	Title:	V.P.


 




    	-2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

## Notice of Meeting

The ACRS Subcommittee on Radiation Protection and Nuclear Materials will hold a meeting on July 6, 2009, Room T2-B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

The meeting will be open to public attendance.

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

### Monday, July 6, 2009—1 p.m.-5 p.m.

The Subcommittee will review Template NEI-08-08, “Generic FSAR Template Guidance for Life-Cycle Minimization of Contamination,” and Interim Staff Guidance (ISG) ISG-06, “Evaluation and Acceptance Criteria for 10 CFR 20.1406 to Support Design Certification and Combined License Applications.” The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), NRC staff and other interested persons regarding the template and the draft ISG. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.

                    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. Derek Widmayer, (Telephone: 301-415-7366) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted. Detailed procedures for the conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 6, 2008 (73 FR 58268-58269).                

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 8 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

Dated: June 9, 2009.

Antonio F. Dias,

Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B, Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.

[FR Doc. E9-14117 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
K[nOa-V3r<30&q-£Q

Vs. ) -for -Wve. SWvW c^-^kyj^s

The, SU^e, o£ TexAS ] t^A^l-.T^A-S COURT OF .CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 10 2015

J^ifl^i-^SLASP^^ fc-Ae. Pi.ZlSXJj^Xi

-CQUBT43RGg|MINAL APPEAbSlQ.JDbe.-\Vj^g^e^e^..Cxx^ ct. C^W.n^V ,Jkfip^SJ'Q. 2G>5

v Abel Acosta, Clerk ^.

Cowie,

JP£D_2£ ^o£ rY\n\res ^p^ .r^uA-\r\-._s>uiS9.Pi>^-jt^vp, ex^es:..

UvOstY\P*A" \.1\ -VW^• Y^uW, ..<^r„,fc^p eA\a5te,. Vc^C^A^^^Sl^.

ja^-cg) ixW^ ^\>v)5 Vy;s ^p^VIo^ fe?r d^

fiKJd , Xlsl ^\A.„JSbQVs\.-o,

?:\e^ b^

"The, pp^ruvA fee YVm\^mJ u\ aiAfrnvMy due, ^o ...b^..

kv ^ <fa- ra-~3yv o^,Th&.. op^<*rl o^.....iV^...cAjrV-...ij^s

dA^Pffed Qk^ kprtl °^ QO^Sl-^A-iA-i'oKtPjT.: hA.s_.J£w* &-BqA&eI

-fcr exA^L&s&xV c£ 4iyy^,.

Y^kkoKte^ a.5._.jC.vjLffl&M-kty—iAic.<g^i3gr^:^u^,,, j^,,-„, ~tt>&.,

jT^yt-Au-kcas<^ ,.Dcv;sqj\V^ le^AS T>e^rVifY\piv^' r!r C>r>VofMfel duske.

feklii OMfj/" ^W. b», &l^ & yrp se^ fte.VA-W\. lA- v^ cuffex^,.

kM , , „fe^pel\^M±L_.

YYNQNTeT jV \ y v