alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         213,672
<SECURITIES>                                 2,507,552
<RECEIVABLES>                                      997
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               562,701
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,896,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          330,367
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,711,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,896,282
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,072
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               310,040
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (889,578)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (889,578)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (889,578)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (34.45)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (34.45)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS IS NET LOSS PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Isaac Ainetchi et al., Appellants, v 500 West End LLC, Respondent.

Submitted July 23, 2012;

decided September 6, 2012

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*19 NY3d 805 (2012)].

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
#### Agrifina C. BARO, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2006-7064.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 13, 2006.

Agrifina C. Baro, pro se.

*ORDER*

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Agrifina C. Baro moves to vacate the court’s April 11, 2006 order dismissing Baro’s appeal for failure to file a brief.

We note that Baro has now submitted her informal brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The court’s April 11, 2006 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the appeal is reinstated.

*999(2) The Secretary of Veterans Affairs’ brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order.
# NIMH Pages About Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)

Overview of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)...

Find current clinical trials on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)...

----

### Latest Director's Messages About Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)

From Lab to Clinic: The Power of Translational Research for Mental Health
                                                          By  on                September 18, 2023

                                                          By  on                April 18, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION

Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on May 1, 2009, Noramco Inc., Division of Ortho-McNeil, Inc., 1440 Olympic Drive, Athens, Georgia 30601, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of Noroxymorphone (9668), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.

The company plans to bulk manufacture the above listed controlled substance for distribution to its customers.

Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a).

Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152; and must be filed no later than August 24, 2009.

Dated: June 15, 2009.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-14704 Filed 6-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
srer_ex102.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


PROMISSORY NOTE







This First Amendment to Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is entered into on July 11, 2013 by and between SearchCore, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and Sabas Carrillo, an individual (the “Holder”)







RECITALS







WHEREAS, Company and Holder are parties to that certain Promissory Note dated December 31, 2012 in the original principal amount of $53,750 (the “Original Note”);







WHEREAS, Company and Holder desire to amend certain provisions of the Original Note, effective as of June 30, 2013, as set forth herein.







NOW, THEREFORE, for good and adequate consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Holder agree as follows:







AGREEMENT







1.           Section 2 of the Original Note is restated in its entirety as follows:


 


“2.           PAYMENT OF THE NOTE.  The Principal Amount of this Note shall be paid by the Company as follows:


 


(a) The Company shall pay the Holder Twelve Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($12,500) on September 30, 2013; and


 


(b) The Company shall make twenty three (23) equal monthly installments of principal and interest of One Thousand Eight Hundred Eleven Dollars and Sixty Five Cents ($1,811.65) beginning September 30, 2013 and continuing on the 30th of each month thereafter.


 


If any payment of principal or interest under this Note shall not be made within ten (10) business days when due, a late charge of ten percent (10%) of the outstanding payment amount may be charged by Holder for the purpose of defraying the expenses incident to handling such delinquent payments.  Such late charge represents a reasonable sum considering all of the circumstances existing on the date of this Note and represents a fair and reasonable estimate of the costs that will be sustained by Holder due to the failure of Company to make timely payments.”


 




  





Page 1 of 2











  











2.           Other than as set forth herein, the terms and conditions of the Original Note shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Company and Holder have executed this Agreement on the date first written above.








	
“Holder”

	
“Company”


	  	  
	  	
SearchCore, Inc.


	  	
a Nevada corporation


	  	  
	  	  
	
/s/ Sabas Carrillo                                                 

	
/s/ James Pakulis                                                     


	By:	
Sabas Carrillo, an individual

	By:	
James Pakulis


	  	Its:	
President and Chief Executive Officer


	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	  	  










 


Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 24


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY



         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each of the undersigned directors
and officers of Bethlehem Steel Corporation, a Delaware corporation,
constitutes and appoints Robert S.  Miller, Jr., Leonard M.  Anthony and Lonnie
A.  Arnett, and each of them, with full power to act without the others, as his
or her true and lawful attorney-in- fact and agent, with full and several power
of substitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any
and all capacities, to sign Bethlehem Steel Corporation's Annual Report on Form
10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, including any amendments thereto, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of
them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as they or he might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all the said attorneys- in-fact and agents, or any of
them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands and
seals as of the 29th day of January, 2002.



/s/ Robert S. Miller, Jr.                   /s/ Leonard M. Anthony
-----------------------------               --------------------------
Robert S. Miller, Jr.                       Leonard M. Anthony
Chairman and Director                       Senior Vice President
(principal executive officer)               (principal financial officer)



/s/ Lonnie A. Arnett
------------------------------
Lonnie A. Arnett
Vice President and Controller
(principal accounting officer)



<PAGE>


/s/ Benjamin R. Civiletti                   /s/ Harry P. Kamen
-----------------------------               ----------------------------
Benjamin R. Civiletti                       Harry P. Kamen
Director                                    Director



/s/ Worley H. Clark                         /s/ William M. Landuyt
-----------------------------               ----------------------------
Worley H. Clark                             William M. Landuyt
Director                                    Director



/s/ John B. Curcio                          /s/ Shirley D. Peterson
-----------------------------               ----------------------------
John B. Curcio                              Shirley D. Peterson
Director                                    Director



/s/ Lewis B. Kaden                          /s/ John F. Ruffle
-----------------------------               ----------------------------
Lewis B. Kaden                              John F. Ruffle
Director                                    Director




                                       2

<PAGE>
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-15-00241-CR 

ROBERT DALE KNOOP, JR., APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 31st District Court 

Hemphill County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2506, Honorable Steven Ray Emmert, Presiding 

 

July 9, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant, Robert Dale Knoop, Jr., pled guilty to and was convicted of the offense 

of driving while intoxicated. On January 24, 2002, appellant was sentenced to 

incarceration in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, for a 

period of fifteen years, and a $500 fine. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal of this 

conviction and was appointed counsel. After appointed counsel filed a motion to 

withdraw supported by an Anders brief, see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 

87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), this Court independently examined the record 
2

and, agreeing with counsel’s assessment that there were no arguable grounds that 

might support the appeal, granted counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirmed the trial

court’s judgment. See Knoop v. State, No. 07-02-00199-CR, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 

8037, at *2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Nov. 8, 2002, pet. ref’d). Following refusal of 

appellant’s petition for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, 

mandate was issued on May 7, 2003. This Court’s plenary power expired 60 days after 

judgment. TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1(a). 

As appellant has been previously informed on two separate occasions, this Court 

does not have jurisdiction over appellant’s attempted appeal. See Knoop v. State, No. 

07-15-00057-CR, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 1610 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Feb. 18, 2015, no 

pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Knoop v. State, No. 07-14-

00380-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 11587 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Oct. 21, 2014, no pet.) 

(per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Because this Court is without 

plenary power over this appeal, no further action may be taken by this Court in this 

proceeding and the appeal is hereby dismissed.1

Per Curiam

Do not publish. 

 

1

Appellant’s attempt to appeal contends that, since the time of his conviction and sentencing, 

one of the prior convictions used to enhance the punishment range for his DWI conviction has been 

vacated. While this is not an issue that can be addressed in this cause due to this Court’s lack of 

jurisdiction, appellant may be able to obtain recourse by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus 

returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West 

Supp. 2014).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond Michael, Appellant.

Submitted June 17, 2013;

decided June 25, 2013

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
NOTE

$50,000,000
        July 3, 2008


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ENERJEX RESOURCES, INC., ENERJEX KANSAS, INC. and DD ENERGY, INC. (collectively, Borrowers), jointly and severally, hereby promise to pay to the order of TEXAS CAPITAL BANK, N.A., or its registered assigns (Bank), in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement (as hereinafter defined) the principal amount of FIFTY MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($50,000,000) or so much thereof as may be outstanding from time to time, pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of even date herewith (as the same may be amended, restated, extended, or supplemented from time to time, the Agreement), among Borrowers, Texas Capital Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent and the Banks party thereto from time to time.  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Note have the meanings given them in the Agreement.

Borrowers promise to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Loan from the date of such Loan until such principal amount is paid in full, at such interest rates and at such times as provided in the Agreement.  All payments of principal and interest shall be made to Bank in Dollars in immediately available funds at Banks Lending Office.  If any amount is not paid in full when due hereunder, such unpaid amount shall bear interest, to be paid upon demand, from the due date thereof until the date of actual payment (and before as well as after judgment) computed at the per annum rate set out in the Agreement.

This Note is the Note referred to in the Agreement and may be prepaid in whole or in part subject to the terms and conditions provided therein. This Note is also entitled to the benefits of and is secured by the Collateral.  Upon the occurrence and continuation of one or more of the Events of Default specified in the Agreement, all amounts then remaining unpaid on this Note shall become, or may be declared to be, immediately due and payable all as provided in the Agreement.  Loans made by Bank shall be evidenced by one or more Loan accounts or records maintained by Bank in the ordinary course of business.  Bank may also attach schedules to this Note and endorse thereon the date, amount and maturity of its Loans and payments with respect thereto.

Borrowers, for themselves, and their respective successors and assigns, hereby waive diligence, presentment, protest and demand and notice of protest, demand, dishonor and non-payment of this Note.

THIS NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS.

[Signatures follow]

1364932v1



---





ENERJEX RESOURCES, INC.

By: /s/ Steve Cochennet


Steve Cochennet


Chief Executive Officer






ENERJEX KANSAS, INC.

By: /s/ Steve Cochennet


Steve Cochennet


Chief Executive Officer




DD ENERGY, INC.

By: /s/ Steve Cochennet


Steve Cochennet


Chief Executive Officer








Signature Page to Note
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Palladium Communications,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Wilf Shorrocks, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,
          in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


/s/WILF SHORROCKS
Wilf Shorrocks
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6753

ANTHONY LAMBERT, SR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Albermarle Child Support Enforcement Agency,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-96-833-5-BO)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lambert, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). The district court rejected the magistrate judge's

analysis and found the case to be moot. We find that the case is

not moot, see Leonard v. Hammond, 804 F.2d 838, 842-43 (4th Cir.

1986) (holding that habeas corpus challenges to civil contempt

orders for failure to pay child support are "capable of repetition

yet evading review"), but that, as the magistrate judge found, Appellant's claims are meritless. We therefore grant a certificate of

appealability and affirm as modified for the reasons stated by the

magistrate judge. Lambert v. North Carolina, No. CA-96-833-5-BO

(E.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
EXHIBIT 32(b)



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of The Bank of New York Company, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 28, 2006



/s/ Bruce W. Van SaunName:

Bruce W. Van SaunTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
# Development of the RDoC Framework

The initial development of the RDoC matrix was the collaborative effort of leading scientists across multiple workshops to articulate and define the knowledge for each of the five domains.

The proceedings of these meetings demonstrate the type of formative conversations that laid the foundation for each of the five domains that comprise RDoC:
                  - Working Memory Workshop Proceedings, July 2010 (this construct is part of the Cognitive Systems Domain, but the meeting was conducted separately as a trial run for the entire workshop process) ( HTML  /  PDF )
                  - Negative Valence Systems Workshop Proceedings, March 2011 ( HTML  /  PDF )
                  - Positive Valence Systems Workshop Proceedings, June 2011 ( HTML  /  PDF )
                  - Cognitive Systems Workshop Proceedings, October 2011 ( HTML  /  PDF )
                  - Systems for Social Processes Workshop Proceedings, February 2012 ( HTML  /  PDF )
                  - Arousal/Regulatory Systems Workshop Proceedings, June 2012 ( HTML  /  PDF )
                  - Sensorimotor Domain Workshop Proceedings, September 2018 ( PDF )

These documents are intended only as summaries of the workshops’ proceedings, and not as definitive scientific reviews of the many issues involved.
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop #1621 Washington, DC 20240 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 WWW.NIGC.GOV

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK; Oklahoma City, OK

July 11, 2022

Beverly Cook

Michael Conners

Ronald LaFrance Jr.

Tribal Chiefs

Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe

71 Margaret Terrance Memorial Way

Akwesasne, NY 13655

Re: Saint Regis Mohawk Tribal Gaming Ordinance amendments, Resolution 2022-14

Dear Chiefs Cook, Conners, and LaFrance:

This letter responds to your request dated May 3, 2022, on behalf of the Saint Regis 

Mohawk Tribe for the National Indian Gaming Commission Chairman to review and approve 

amendments to the Tribe’s gaming ordinance.

Resolution 2022-14 replaces the Tribe’s current gaming ordinance, TCR 1993-102, with 

a wholly revised and updated version. This newly amended ordinance reflects recent 

amendments to NIGC background and licensing provisions, the Tribe’s intent to allow only 

tribally owned gaming on its lands, and other updates deemed necessary by the Tribe in the 

twenty years since the last amendment.

The amendments are consistent with the requirements of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 

Act and NIGC regulations and are hereby approved. If you have any questions concerning this 

letter or the ordinance review process, please contact Jennifer Lawson at 

jennifer_lawson@nigc.gov.

Sincerely,

E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Chairman