alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The GWSPI Company, LLC, 

as Successor in Interest to 

Wilmington Trust, NA, 

Trustee of the Jeffrey P. 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 10, 2015

No. 04-15-00398-CV

Caroline BUSWELL,

Appellant

v.

THE GWSPI COMPANY, LLC, as Successor in Interest to Wilmington Trust, NA, Trustee of 

the Jeffrey P. Blanchard 2013 Family Trust,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-06197

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The District Clerk's Notification of Late Record is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended 

to July 24, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000854062
<NAME>                         GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-H
                                
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                              401,636
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       112,645
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    514,281
<PP&E>                            5,750,972
<DEPRECIATION>                    4,628,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,666,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                25,912
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                        1,626,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,666,577
<SALES>                             412,973
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    732,818
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       249,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     483,106
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 483,106
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        483,106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          4.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        
 

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Daltun A.B., an Infant. Steuben County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Daniel B., Jr., Appellant. (And Two Other Proceedings.)

Submitted April 22, 2013;

decided June 4, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. John L. BLANCHARD, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-6136.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 15, 2006.

Decided: June 19, 2006.

John L. Blanchard, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

John L. Blanchard seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Blanchard has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con*399tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 10.9


 


AGREEMENT


 


This Agreement is entered into as of July 22,
2013 between Silverstar Mining Corp., a Nevada corporation (“Silverstar” or the “Company”) and Petra Corp.
(“Lender”).


 


WHEREAS, on or about
December 17, 2010 Lender loaned Silverstar $15,000, and on or about December 31, 2010 Lender loaned Silverstar $2,183.68, and on
or about April 4, 2011 Lender loaned Silverstar $16,000, and on or about August 1, 2011 Lender loaned Silverstar $14,000, and on
or about September 2, 2011 Lender loaned Silverstar $16,000, in aggregate $63,183.68; and


 


WHEREAS, the loan
agreements have been memorialized in a demand notes dated December 17, 2010, December 31,2010, April 4, 2011, August 1, 2011, and
September 2, 2011; and


 


WHEREAS, Silverstar
does not have sufficient funds to satisfy the loan obligations; and


 


WHEREAS, on July
22, 2013 the Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan whereby debt holders could convert their loan into shares of common
stock at a conversion rate of $0.35 per share; and


 


WHEREAS, Lender
has agreed to exchange the loan obligation(s) for the convertible debenture;


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
it is mutually agreed that:


 


1. SilverStar shall execute
the attached convertible debenture solely in exchange for the $63,183.68 loans plus accrued interest made by Lender to Silverstar.


 


2. Upon execution of the
convertible debenture, all sums otherwise due and payable by Silverstar are hereby incorporated in the convertible debenture. In
case of default, Lender’s sole remedy shall be pursuant to the Convertible Debenture.


 


3. This Agreement shall
be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Nevada. Jurisdiction for any dispute shall be in the state
of Nevada. In the event of any litigation, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all costs including attorney fees.


 


4. Each party acknowledges
and represents that each party has either retained independent legal counsel or had sufficient time to retain independent legal
counsel to review this Agreement and the Convertible Debenture.


 




    	 



    	 



    


 


This Agreement is executed this 22nd
day of July, 2013


 


	Silverstar Mining Corp.	 
	 	 	 
	BY:	/s/ Neil Kleinman	 
	 	Neil Kleinman	 
	ITS:	CEO	 
	 	 	 
	Lender 	 
	 	 	 
	BY:	/s/ Avraham Mishal 	 
	 	Avraham Mishal	 
	ITS:	Authorized Signatory
Filed 7/13/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2015 ND 186

In the Interest of B.D.E.

Adam D. Miller, Psy.D, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

B.D.E., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20150188

Appeal from the District Court of Ramsey County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Donovan John Foughty, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Lonnie Olson, State’s Attorney, 524 Fourth Ave. N.E., Unit 16, Devils Lake, ND 58301, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Ulysses Samuel Jones, P.O. Box 165, Devils Lake, ND 58301-0165, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

Interest of B.D.E.

No. 20150188

Per Curiam.

[¶1]B.D.E. appeals from a district court order requiring him to continue outpatient treatment for six months.  B.D.E. argues clear and convincing evidence does not support the district court’s finding that he is a person requiring treatment.  We conclude the district court’s finding that B.D.E. qualifies as a person requiring treatment is supported by clear and convincing evidence and is, therefore, not clearly erroneous.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers
Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 CECILE FOY GSANGER

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

July 13, 2015

Don Ray White

CMRRR# 7013 3020 0000 9564 2169

TDCJ ID# 512713

Polunsky Unit

3872 FM 350

Livingston, TX 77351

Re: Cause No. 13-15-00308-CV

Tr.Ct.No. D-1-GN-13-002904

Style: Don Ray White v. Marla Ramirez

Dear Mr. White:

The Supreme Court ordered the above cause transferred to this Court from the

3rd Court of Appeals. 

The appellant’s notice of appeal in the above cause was received on June 8,

2015, and the clerk’s record was received on July 7, 2015. The docketing statement is

due in this Court within 15 days from the date of this notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 32. 

Upon review of the clerk’s record, it appears that the appeal has not been timely

perfected. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, you are hereby given notice of this defect

so that steps may be taken to cure the defect, if it can be done. If, after the expiration of

ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, this defect is not cured, this appeal will

be dismissed.

Appeals and original proceedings in this Court are governed by the Texas Rules

of Appellate Procedure. The parties to this cause should review the rules and ensure

that their filings meet the requirements of the rules. The parties should also review

information regarding the Court’s policies and procedures which can be found on the

Court’s website at http://www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa.aspx. The Court’s website includes

a wide variety of useful links and specific information about matters such as fees,

motions, the alternative dispute resolution program, oral argument, and access to

appellate records.

Under the recent amendments to the appellate rules, effective January 1, 2014,

all attorneys in civil and criminal cases are required to file all documents (except a

document submitted under seal or subject to a motion to seal) with the Court through

the eFileTexas.gov electronic filing system. Parties not represented by an attorney are

strongly encouraged to e-file documents, but e-filing is not required. An e-filer is not

FILE COPY
Case No. 13-15-00308-CV

Page 2

required to file any paper copies of an e-filed document unless specifically requested by

the Court. All e-filed documents must conform to Rule 9 of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure. If a party is not required to e-file a document, the original and one

unbound copy of the document should be filed. See id. R. 9.3(a)(1). All documents, efiled or submitted in paper, must be redacted in compliance with Rule 9, see id. R. 9.9,

9.10, and e-filed briefs must follow the Texas Supreme Court’s Redaction Guidelines. 

Very truly yours,

Cecile Foy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:pf

FILE COPY
#### In the Matter of Corrina W., Respondent, v Jennifer J. et al., Respondents. Attorney for the Children, Appellant. (And Another Proceeding.)

Submitted May 6, 2013;

decided June 25, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceedings within the meaning of the Constitution.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 15 (Monday, January 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4425-4426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1472]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IN09-9-000]


Seminole Energy Services, LLC; Seminole Gas Company, LLC; 
Seminole High Plains, LLC; Lakeshore Energy Services, LLC; Vanguard 
Energy Services, LLC; Notice of Designation of Commission Staff as Non-
Decisional

January 15, 2009.
    With respect to an order issued by the Commission today in the 
above-captioned docket, with the exceptions noted below, the staff of 
the Office of Enforcement's Division of Investigations (DOI) and Jerome 
Pederson, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Enforcement, are designated 
as non-decisional in deliberations by the Commission in this docket. 
Accordingly, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2202 (2008), they will not serve

[[Page 4426]]

as advisors to the Commission or take part in the Commission's review 
of any offer of settlement. Likewise, as non-decisional staff, pursuant 
to 18 CFR 385.2201 (2008), they are prohibited from communicating with 
advisory staff concerning any deliberations in this docket. Exceptions 
in DOI to this designation are: Robert E. Pease, Todd Mullins, Suzanne 
McNamara, Tegan Flynn, Lauren Rosenblatt, John Hutchings, Renee Thorne.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-1472 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 337 

To prohibit the importation of ruminants and swine, and fresh and frozen 

meat and products of ruminants and swine, from Argentina until the 

Secretary of Agriculture certifies to Congress that every region of Argentina is free of foot and mouth disease without vaccination. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2009 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself, Mr. ENZI, Mr. TESTER, Mr. THUNE, Mrs. 

MCCASKILL, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. BARRASSO, 

and Mr. CONRAD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To prohibit the importation of ruminants and swine, and 

fresh and frozen meat and products of ruminants and 

swine, from Argentina until the Secretary of Agriculture 

certifies to Congress that every region of Argentina is 

free of foot and mouth disease without vaccination. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foot and Mouth Dis5 ease Prevention Act of 2009’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 337 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF ARGENTINE 

2 RUMINANTS AND SWINE UNTIL ARGENTINA 

3 IS FREE OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE 

4 WITHOUT VACCINATION. 

5 The Secretary of Agriculture shall prohibit the impor6 tation into the United States of any ruminant or swine, 

7 or any fresh (including chilled or frozen) meat or fresh 

8 (including chilled or frozen) product of any ruminant or 

9 swine, that is born, raised, or slaughtered in Argentina 

10 until the Secretary certifies to Congress that every region 

11 of Argentina is free of foot and mouth disease without vac12 cination. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
# Publicaciones acerca trastorno bipolar

El trastorno bipolar en los niños y los adolescentes

Este folleto ofrece información sobre el trastorno bipolar en los niños y los adolescentes, incluyendo causas, síntomas, diagnóstico, opciones de tratamiento y cómo ayudar y apoyar a un niño o adolescente que tenga este trastorno.

In English

Trastorno bipolar

Este folleto sobre el trastorno bipolar presenta información sobre los síntomas, las causas, el diagnóstico, las opciones de tratamiento y los recursos para encontrar ayuda sea para usted o para los demás. 

In English

Trastorno bipolar en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes: Conozca los signos

Esta infografía presenta los indicios y los síntomas frecuentes del trastorno bipolar en los adolescentes y los adultos jóvenes.

In English
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     financial statements contained in the Registrant's Quarterly Report on 
     Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its
     entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              10,760
<SECURITIES>                                         7,445
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    18,205
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      18,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               26,129
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               312
<OTHER-SE>                                         912,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        18,205
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       240
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     5,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (5,066)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (5,066)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (5,066)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0)
        


</TABLE>
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 303 

Expressing support for the designation of April 11, 2019, as 

‘‘Remanufacturing Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Ms. STEVENS (for herself, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, and Ms. JACKSON LEE) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of April 11, 2019, 

as ‘‘Remanufacturing Day’’. 

Whereas remanufacturing is a comprehensive and rigorous 

industrial process by which a previously sold, leased, 

used, worn, or nonfunctional product or part is returned 

to a ‘‘same-as-when-new’’ or better condition, from both 

a quality and performance perspective, through a controlled, reproducible, and sustainable process; 

Whereas remanufacturing has been recognized by leading 

universities, research institutions, and manufacturers 

around the world as the highest form of recycling, by reducing greenhouse gas production, saving energy, and reclaiming end-of-life products; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 303 IH 

Whereas by encouraging businesses, State agencies, nonprofit 

organizations, schools, and individuals to celebrate Remanufacturing Day, 2019, we can further promote remanufacturing as environmentally friendly and economically efficient; and 

Whereas to focus the Nation’s attention on the benefits of remanufacturing, businesses, educational institutions, and 

nonprofit organizations have joined together to celebrate 

Remanufacturing Day and are encouraging colleagues, 

friends, families, and communities to learn more about 

the benefits of remanufactured products: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘Remanufacturing Day’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# Publications about Eating Disorders

Eating Disorders: About More Than Food

This brochure provides information about eating disorders including who is at risk, common types of eating disorders and the symptoms of each, treatment options, and resources to find help for yourself or someone else.

En español

Let’s Talk About Eating Disorders

This infographic presents facts that can help shape conversations around eating disorders.

En español
Exhibit 10.1 - Exhibit G-2 Form of Exeption Certificate






EXHIBIT G-2
FORM OF EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE
Reference is made to the Credit Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2013 (as amended, supplemented, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”; unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among M/I HOMES, INC., an Ohio corporation (the “Borrower”), the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties thereto as lenders, including the Swingline Lender and the Issuing Lender (collectively, the “Lenders”), PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as administrative agent for the Lenders (the “Administrative Agent”) and the other agents party thereto.  [______________________] (the “Non-U.S. Lender”) is providing this certificate pursuant to Section 2.16(d) of the Credit Agreement.  The Non-U.S. Lender hereby represents and warrants that:
1.    The Non-U.S. Lender is the sole record owner of the Loans (as well as any Note(s) evidencing such Loans) in respect of which it is providing this certificate;
2.    The Non-U.S. Lender's direct or indirect partners/members are the sole beneficial owners of the Loans (as well as any Note(s) evidencing such Loans) in respect of which it is providing this certificate;
3.    Neither the Non-U.S. Lender nor its direct or indirect partners/members that are beneficial owners  of the Loans is a “bank” for purposes of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Code;
3.    Neither the Non-U.S. Lender nor its direct or indirect partners/members that are beneficial owners of the Loans is a 10-percent shareholder of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Code; 
4.    Neither the Non-U.S. Lender nor its direct or indirect partners/members that are beneficial owners of the Loans is a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Code; and
5.    The interest payments in question are not effectively connected with the  conduct of a U.S. trade or business by the undersigned nor any of its partners/members that is a beneficial owner of the Loans.


The undersigned has furnished the Administrative Agent and the Borrower with IRS Form W-8IMY accompanied by an IRS Form W-8BEN from each of its partners/members claiming the portfolio interest exemption.  By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that (1) if the information provided on this certificate changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform the Borrower and the Administrative Agent and (2) the undersigned shall have at all times furnished the Borrower and the Administrative Agent with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of the two calendar years preceding such payments. 
[Signature page follows.]









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this certificate to be duly executed and delivered as of the date indicated below.
[NAME OF NON-U.S. LENDER]
By:_______________________________
Name:
Title:
Date:  ____________________