alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the filing by Camelot Corporation (the "Company") of the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending April 30, 2008 (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operation of the Company.







                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  May 7, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,

Board Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-14129 Filed 6-11-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
B EXH 10.3 06.30.2013






EXHIBIT 10.3






Amendment 2013-1 to the 
Barnes Group Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan


Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of the Barnes Group Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended effective July 23, 2013 (the “SERP”), shall be amended as follows:
		
	1.
	The second sentence in Section 4.1 of the SERP is hereby restated in its entirety to read as follows:




“A Participant who does not have a Spouse on the date the payment of benefits hereunder actually commences (with regard to Section 5.1) shall not be entitled to a benefit under the Plan.”
		
	2.
	Section 4.2 of the SERP is hereby restated in its entirety to read as follows: 




“Qualified Plan Component.  This component shall be the product, determined as of the Participant's Benefit Commencement Date hereunder, of (a) the Participant's Qualified Plan Benefit, times (b) one (1.0) minus the 50% contingent annuitant factor applicable under the Qualified Plan for the ages of the Participant and the Participant's Spouse.”
		
	3.
	In all respects not amended, the SERP is hereby ratified and confirmed.




Date of Approval by the Board of Directors:  July 23, 2013
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 19, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00283-CV

FRANK JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

DORENA MARINO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 280th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-03905

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 7, 2020. The clerk’s 

record was filed May 27, 2020. The reporter’s record was filed June 8, 2020. No 

brief was filed.

On October 8, 2020, this court issued an order stating that unless appellant 

filed a brief on or before November 9, 2020, the court would dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
2

Appellant filed no brief or other response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Wise and Hassan.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6834
ANDREW WINDSOR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus B. G. COMPTON, Warden, USP Lee, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-228, CA-03-251-7) Submitted: September 30, 2003 Decided: October 8, 2003 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew Windsor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Andrew Windsor, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Compton v. Windsor , Nos. CR-90-228, CA-03-251-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000850506
<NAME> GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-F
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         710,290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  328,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,038,879
<PP&E>                                      12,310,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,655,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,766,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,954
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,675,127
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,766,403
<SALES>                                      1,176,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,351,273
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,954,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (603,678)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (603,678)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (603,678)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000810836
<NAME> HEALTHCARE INVESTORS OF AMERICA, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          76,285
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,285
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,381,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,239,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          635,036
<BONDS>                                      4,325,404
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     (720,753)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,239,687
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               561,606
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  219,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             395,780
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (33,610)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,610)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,610)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY   FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BANTA CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS  ENDED  JANUARY 2, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                         1,846
<SECURITIES>                                   24,738
<RECEIVABLES>                                  237,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,835
<INVENTORY>                                    74,724
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               354,620
<PP&E>                                         758,440
<DEPRECIATION>                                 439,805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 769,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          196,491
<BONDS>                                        120,628
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,826
<OTHER-SE>                                     407,105
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   769,966
<SALES>                                        1,335,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,335,796
<CGS>                                          1,070,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,070,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               167,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                86,090
<INCOME-TAX>                                   33,150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            52,940
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   52,940
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.80 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.80
<FN>
<F1>THE EPS UNDER THE "EPS - PRIMARY" TAG REPRESENTS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
FOR THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS 

AT TEXARKANA, TEXAS 

CEDRIC CARLDWELL '

Appellant 

V. ' CASE NO. 06-15-00035-CR

TRIAL COURT NO. 42773-B 

THE STATE OF TEXAS 

Appellee '

THIRD MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE APPELLANT=S BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

NOW COMES, CEDRIC CARLDWELL, the Appellant herein, and moves the Court for 

an extension of time to file Appellant=s Brief in this cause, pursuant to Rules 38.6 and 10.5 (b) of 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and in support thereof would show the Court as follows: 

I.

The Appellant in this cause was convicted in the 124th District Court, Gregg County, 

Texas in cause number 42773-B for the offense of Murder. On November 20, 2014, punishment 

was assessed at Life in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division. 

II. 

The Reporter=s record was filed on May 5, 2015. The Appellant=s Brief is due on or about 

July 16, 2015. 

III. 

The Appellant hereby requests an extension of time to file Appellant=s Brief. 

The undersigned counsel has been unable to devote sufficient time to the review of the 

record, research and preparation of Appellant=s Brief for the following good and sufficient 

ACCEPTED

06-15-00035-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

7/13/2015 12:22:16 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 7/13/2015 12:22:16 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
reasons:

This counsel’s illness continues and he is still under a doctor’s care. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned counsel, on behalf of 

Appellant, respectfully prays that this Honorable Court extend the time for filing Appellant=s 

Brief for an additional one (01) week, to July 23, 2015. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

__/s/ Clement Dunn_______

Attorney for Appellant

140 E. Tyler Street, Suite 240

Longview, TX 75601

(903) 753-7071 Fax (903) 753-8783

State Bar # 06249300
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

As Attorney of Record for Defendant, I do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy of 

the above and foregoing document was this date provided to the Attorney for the State.

Date: 07-13-15

__/s/ Clement Dunn_______

Attorney for Appellant
FOR THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

AT TEXARKANA, TEXAS

CEDRIC CARLDWELL '

Appellant

VI. ' CASE NO. 06-15-00035-CR

TRIAL COURT NO. 42773-B

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee '

ORDER

BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the _____ day of __________________, 2015, came

on to be considered the above and foregoing Third Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Appellant=s Brief. After consideration of the same, it is the opinion of the Court that Appellant=s 

Motion be:

( ) GRANTED, and the present cause is hereby extended until _________________, 

2015.

( ) DENIED, to which ruling the Appellant excepts.

( ) SET FOR HEARING ON THE _____ day of __________________, 2015, at 

_____ o=clock_____.

SIGNED:

_____________________________

JUDGE PRESIDING
#### David P. Kaplan et al., Respondents, v Madison Park Group Owners, LLC, et al., Defendants, and David Lipman, Appellant.

Submitted June 11, 2012;

decided September 11, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
[879 NYS2d 266]

#### 46 East 91st Street Associates, LLC, Respondent, v Samuel Bogoch et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

April 27, 2009

*37APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Vernon & Ginsburg, LLP,*New York City *(Mel B. Ginsburg*of counsel), and *Pryor Cashman LLP,*New York City *{Eric D. Sherman*and *Luisa K. Hagemeier*of counsel), for appellants. *Morris K. Mitrani, PC.,*New York City, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order, dated November 15, 2007, insofar as appealed from, reversed, without costs, that branch of tenants’ motion seeking leave to amend their answer to assert a defense founded upon Multiple Dwelling Law § 302-a is granted, and the proposed amended answer is deemed served, upon condition that tenants, within 10 days after service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, deposit $53,076.60 with the Clerk of the Civil Court, an amount representing the rent allegedly due landlord at the time of tenants’ motion. Upon tenants’ failure to comply with this condition, the order appealed from is affirmed, without costs.

Leave to amend pleadings is to be freely given, absent a showing of prejudice or surprise *(see*CPLR 3025 [b]; *Edenwald Contr. Co. v City of New York,*60 NY2d 957, 959 [1983]). Here, there was no showing of prejudice or surprise resulting from the elderly tenants’ delay in formally seeking leave to amend their pro se answer to assert the “fundamental” defense relating to the applicability of the rent forfeiture provisions of Multiple Dwelling Law § 302-a *(see Cretans Assn.*‘Omonoia’ *Inc. v Perkis, 4*Misc 3d 136[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 50830[U] [2004]). Notably, tenants properly and timely asserted the statutory defense in a companion nonpayment proceeding subsequently commenced by landlord to recover possession of another apartment leased by tenants in the same building, and indicated their intention to assert the statutory defense in this proceeding by way of an “Annex to Answer” served and filed, albeit without authorization, within one month of the commencement of this proceeding. Nor were tenants’ moving papers unreliable or insufficient to support the defense *(see Peach Parking Corp. v 346 W. 40th St., LLC,*52 AD3d 260 [2008]). We thus exercise our discretion and grant tenants’ amendment request, upon *38their compliance with the rent deposit requirement of Multiple Dwelling Law § 302-a (3) (c), as indicated above.

McKeon, EJ., and Heitler, J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 118 (Monday, June 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14657]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, June 
24, 2009 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be: The Commission will 
consider whether to propose amendments governing the operations of 
money market funds.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: June 17, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-14657 Filed 6-18-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOHN B ERM AN, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. JOHN DOE; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-35739 D.C . No. 1:13-c v-00958-PA M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ore gon Owe n M . Panne r, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d M arc h 10, 2015 ** B e fore : FARR IS, W ARDLAW , a nd PAEZ, C irc uit Judge s. John B e rm an a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dism issing his a c tion a lle ging sta

te la w c la im s a

rising from

the burgla

ry of a re nta l prope rty . W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo a de te rm ination of subje c t m atte r jurisdic tion. K untz v . Lamar C

orp. , 385 F.3d 1177, 1191 n.6 (9th



# FIL ED MAR 20 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).C ir. 2004). W e re vie w for an a buse of disc re tion a dism issa l without le a ve to a m e nd. Lope

z v . Smith , 203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th C ir. 2000) (e n ba nc ). W e va c a te and re m and. Although the distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d B e rm an’ s a c tion for fa ilure to a lle ge fa c ts suffic ie nt to show c om ple te dive rsity

be twe e n the pa

rtie s, se e Molnar v . N at’l Broad. C

o ., 231 F.2d 684, 687 (9th C i r. 1956) (“ in the a bse n c e of [] ide n tific a tion or c onne c tion or na m e , [] the a lle gation of c itiz e nship ... is illusory ” ), the d istric t c o urt a

buse d its disc re tion by

dism issing without giving B e rm a n an opportunity

to a m e nd. Se e W

e ilburg v . Shapiro , 488 F.3d 1202, 1205 (9th C ir. 2007) (“ Dism issa l of a

pro se c om

pla int without le a ve to a

m e nd is prope r only

if it is a bsolute ly c le ar that the de fic ie nc ie s of the c om pla int c ould not bec ure d by a m e ndm e nt.” (c ita

tion a nd inte rna l quota

tion m arks om itte d)); se e also 28 U.S.C . § 1653 (“ De fe c tive a lle gations of jurisdic tion m ay be am e nde d, upon te rm s, in the tria l or a ppe l late c ourts.” ). Ac c ordingly , we va c a te the judgm e nt a nd re m and to the distric t c o urt with instruc tions to provide B e rm an with a

n opportunity to file an a m e nde d c o m

pla int. The pa rtie s sha ll be ar the ir own c osts on a ppe a l. V ACAT E D and RE M ANDE D .

1 3 - 3 5 7 3 9 2