alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SCPW-24-0000485

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

________________________________________________________________

SILAS VALDEZ, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE ROWENA A. SOMERVILLE, 

Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, 

State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge,

and

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent.

________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CASE NO. 1CPN-23-0000023)

ORDER DENYING PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the letter filed on July 22, 2024, 

which we construe as a petition for a writ of mandamus, and the 

record, the amount of time that has passed without court action 

does not amount to a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, 

nor a refusal to act on a subject before the court under 

circumstances in which the court has a legal duty to act. An 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-24-0000485

30-AUG-2024

01:25 PM

Dkt. 5 ODDP
2

extraordinary writ is unwarranted. See Womble Bond Dickinson

(US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 

(2023).

It is ordered that the petition is denied without 

prejudice.

It is further ordered that the appellate clerk shall serve 

a copy of the July 22, 2024 letter and this order on the 

Respondent Judge.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 30, 2024.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure. 

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure will hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation. 

# DATES:

April 20-21, 2009. 

# Time:

8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Northwestern Law School, McCormick Building, 350 East Superior Street, Room 375, Chicago, IL 60611. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820. 

Dated: January 5, 2009. 

John K. Rabiej, 

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.

 [FR Doc. E9-1398 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 224 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 224

    Supporting the goals and ideals of National Deaf History Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2019

 Mrs. Beatty (for herself, Ms. Norton, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. 
Morelle, Mr. Takano, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Brown of Maryland, 
Mr. Courtney, Ms. Moore, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, and Mrs. 
 Luria) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Supporting the goals and ideals of National Deaf History Month.

Whereas the purpose of National Deaf History Month is to increase awareness of 
        and express appreciation for the many contributions that deaf and hard-
        of-hearing individuals have made to our society;
Whereas, according to 2017 Census Bureau estimates, at least 11,200,000 
        individuals in the United States are deaf or hard of hearing;
Whereas Deaf culture is an important part of the fabric of our society;
Whereas deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals have made and continue to make 
        numerous contributions to the United States;
Whereas the American School for the Deaf opened in Hartford, Connecticut, on 
        April 15, 1817, as the first public school for the deaf in the United 
        States;
Whereas Gallaudet University was founded on April 8, 1864, when President 
        Lincoln signed the charter establishing it as the first college for the 
        deaf in the world;
Whereas, on March 13, 1988, Gallaudet University selected its first deaf 
        university president;
Whereas National Deaf History Month has been observed from March 13 to April 15 
        every year since 1997; and
Whereas the National Association of the Deaf and the American Library 
        Association support recognizing March 13 to April 15 as National Deaf 
        History Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Deaf History 
        Month;
            (2) recognizes the many contributions that deaf and hard-
        of-hearing individuals have made to the United States; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        National Deaf History Month with appropriate programs and 
        activities.
                                 <all>
```
96-2180.

#### Gentzler Tool & Die Corp. v. Green.

Summit App. No. 17633. Reported at 77 Ohio St.3d 1514, 674 N.E.2d 370. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., and Douglas, J., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>               1000

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               41645
<SECURITIES>                                         23557
<RECEIVABLES>                                       171667
<ALLOWANCES>                                          9494
<INVENTORY>                                         144740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    416328
<PP&E>                                              363625
<DEPRECIATION>                                      134469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     1176931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               332733
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                              2321
<OTHER-SE>                                          680052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       1176931
<SALES>                                             864320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    894218
<CGS>                                               318121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       318121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    485850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   14859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      75388
<INCOME-TAX>                                         18629
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  56759
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         56759
<EPS-BASIC>                                         2.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.42


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Franklin McPherson, Appellant.

Submitted August 20, 2012;

decided August 28, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Jonathan I. Edelstein, Esq., 271 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
To the Board of Directors
Of Nacanco Paketleme Sanayi vd Ticaret A.s.



22 September 1998


We agree to the inclusion in the Fairchild Company's annual
Report on Form 10-K of our report dated 12 March 1998 on our
audit of the financial statements of Nacanco Paketleme Sanayi vd
Ticaret A.S.


Regards,

Zeynep Uras
Partner
PriceWaterhouse Coopers
BJK Plaza Spo Caddesi No: 92
B Blok, Kat 9 Akaretler
Besilctas 80680 Istanbul-Turkey
<PAGE>


                               BASE TEN SYSTEMS, INC.
                                     EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


The following are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant:


                                               STATE OR JURISDICTION
     NAME                                         OR ORGANIZATION 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Base Ten Aerospace and Communications, Inc.       New Jersey (a)

Base Ten Software, Inc.                           New Jersey (a)

Base Ten Systems, Ltd.                            United Kingdom (a)

Base Ten of Canada, Ltd.                          Canada (b)

Base Ten Investment, Co.                          Delaware (b)

Base Ten International Sales, Ltd.                Jamaica (a)

Base Ten Software, Ltd.                           Ireland (a)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) Financial statements included in Consolidated Financial Statements of
Registrant

(b) Dormant
EXHIBIT 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


      We have issued our report dated April 13, 2009, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of BKF Capital
Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent
to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements
of BKF Capital Group, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-50132, effective November
17, 2000 and 333-75014, effective December 13, 2001).


/s/  Holtz Rubenstein Reminick LLP


New York, New York
April 13, 2009
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies,
Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Q/A for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Martin S Smiley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s/ Martin S.
SmileyMartin S.Smiley Chief Financial Officer

April 16, 2010

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00572-CR

Armando Agusitin Hernandez

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1289389D)

July 3, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to reflect 

that appellant Armando Agusitin Hernandez was convicted of injury to a child by 

knowingly causing serious bodily injury. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel_________________

 Justice Lee Gabriel
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11
BARR LABORATORIES, INC.
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (1)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 1997        1996        1995
<S>                                            <C>         <C>        <C>
PRIMARY
  Average shares outstanding                    21,133      20,968       20,125
  Net effect of dilutive stock options -
  based on the treasury stock method using
  average market price                           1,297         789         - (2)

                                    Total       22,430      21,757       20,125

  Net earnings                                 $19,447     $ 7,016     $  6,225


  Net earnings per share                       $  0.87     $  0.32     $   0.31

FULLY DILUTED
  Average shares outstanding                    21,133      20,968       20,125

  Net effect of dilutive stock options -
  based on the treasury stock method using
  average market price                                       1,172          504
  Fiscal year end market price                   1,773


                                    Total       22,906      22,140       20,629

  Net earnings                                 $19,447     $ 7,016     $  6,225


  Net earnings per share                       $  0.85     $  0.32     $   0.30(3)
</TABLE>

(1)      1996 and 1995 have been adjusted for the May 1997 3-for-2 stock split.

(2)      Stock options of 468 in 1995 are not included because their inclusion
         results in less than 3% dilution.

(3)      Results in less than 3% dilution.
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apogent Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis B. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DENNIS B. BROWNDennis B. Brown Chief Financial Officer  May 13, 2003




This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3608 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the credit for 

qualified fuel cell motor vehicles by maintaining the level of credit for 

vehicles placed in service after 2009 and by allowing the credit for 

certain off-highway vehicles. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2010 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the credit for qualified fuel cell motor vehicles by maintaining the level of credit for vehicles placed in service 

after 2009 and by allowing the credit for certain offhighway vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fuel Cell Industrial 

5 Vehicle Jobs Act of 2010’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3608 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS OF CREDIT FOR QUALIFIED FUEL 

2 CELL MOTOR VEHICLES. 

3 (a) MAINTENANCE OF $8,000 CREDIT AFTER

4 2009.—Subparagraph (A) of section 30B(b)(1) of the In5 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to new qualified 

6 fuel cell motor vehicle credit) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘($4,000 in the case of a vehicle placed in service after 

8 December 31, 2009)’’. 

9 (b) CREDIT FOR CERTAIN OFF-HIGHWAY VEHI10 CLES.—Subsection (b) of section 30B of such Code is 

11 amended by adding at the end the following new para12 graph: 

13 ‘‘(4) SPECIAL RULES FOR CERTAIN OFF-HIGH14 WAY VEHICLES.—Solely for purposes of this sub15 section— 

16 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘motor vehi17 cle’ includes any vehicle which is manufactured 

18 primarily for use in carrying or towing loads or 

19 materials for commercial or industrial purposes, 

20 whether or not on public streets, roads, and 

21 highways and regardless of the type of load or 

22 material carried or towed. The preceding sen23 tence shall not include any vehicle operated ex24 clusively on a rail or rails and any vehicle oper25 ated primarily for recreational purposes. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3608 IS

1 ‘‘(B) CERTAIN STANDARDS NOT TO

2 APPLY.—Subsection (h)(10) shall not apply to a 

3 vehicle which is a motor vehicle solely by reason 

4 of subparagraph (A).’’. 

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply to vehicles placed in service after 

7 December 31, 2009, in taxable years ending after such 

8 date. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KHALIL J. GASKIN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2320

[ December 9, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 0 0 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; William L. Roby

, Judge; L.T. Case No s. 562013CF1093B and 562013CF3488A.

Khalil J. Gaskin, Malone, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, M AY and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000824894    
<NAME>                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PSHIP II-A
                                     
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                   240,745
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            448,690
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         689,435
<PP&E>                                31,024,018
<DEPRECIATION>                        27,038,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         5,376,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    228,979
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             4,966,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           5,376,198
<SALES>                                  659,163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         661,232
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            648,070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           13,162
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       13,162
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              13,162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
 

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854062
<NAME> GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-H
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         399,740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               569,233
<PP&E>                                       6,292,262
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,987,230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,912,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,845
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,864,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,912,487
<SALES>                                        610,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               689,492
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,096,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (406,834)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (406,834)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (406,834)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>