alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Stress Catcher

      - Download PDF
      -  En español 

Life can get challenging sometimes, and it’s important for kids (and adults!) to develop strategies for coping with stress or anxiety. This stress catcher “fortune teller” offers some strategies children can practice and use to help manage stress and other difficult emotions.

Download the PDF of the stress catcher instructions and template to create a fun and interactive way for children to practice coping strategies.

Check out this video to see a demonstration of how to make and use a stress catcher.

## Create Your Stress Catcher

Download and print the PDF template, and then follow these steps to create your own personal stress catcher.

- Step 1. Color the stress catcher (on page 2), and cut out the square.
- Step 2. Place the stress catcher face down. Fold each corner to the opposite corner and then unfold to create two diagonal creases in the square.
- Step 3. Fold each corner toward the center of the square so that the numbers and colors are facing you. Turn over the square, and again fold each corner into the center so that the color names are visible.
- Step 4. Fold the square in half so that the color names are touching, and the numbers are on the outside. Now open it and fold it in half the other way.
- Step 5. Insert your thumb and first finger of each hand (pinching motion) under the number flaps.
- Step 6. Close the stress catcher so only the numbers show.

## Use Your Stress Catcher

- Pick a number, and open and close the stress catcher that number of times.
- Next, pick a color and spell out the color name, opening and closing the stress catcher for each letter.
- Then pick a color that is visible and open that flap.
- Read what it says, and practice the coping strategy.
- This game can be played with one or two players and is a way to practice coping strategies.

## Additional Resources

5 Things You Should Know About Stress

The Teen Brain: 7 Things to Know

5 Action Steps for Helping Someone in Emotional Pain

National Suicide Prevention Lifeline** 1-800-273-TALK (8255) for free 24-hour help

Crisis Text Line** Text HELLO to 741741 for free 24-hour help

Learn more about mental health on NIMH’s Mental Health topic pages and find information on a wide variety of health topics on the National Library of Medicine’s MedlinePlus service **.

U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesNational Institutes of HealthNIH Publication No. 20-MH-8121

## Reprints

The information in this publication is in the public domain and may be reused or copied without permission. However, you may not reuse or copy images. Please cite the National Institute of Mental Health as the source. Read our copyright policy to learn more about our guidelines for reusing NIMH content.
96-2744.

#### Platinum Fin. Serv. Ltd. v. Gurney.

Cuyahoga App. No. 69481. Reported at 78 Ohio St.3d 1428, 676 N.E.2d 533. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., dissents.
#### United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company et al., Respondents, v American Re-Insurance Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted March 18, 2013;

decided May 2, 2013

Motions for reargument denied *[see*20 NY3d 407 (2013)].

Judge Rivera taking no part.
#### Mara Gajevska, Respondent, v Teachers’ Retirement System of the City of New York et al., Respondents. In the Matter of Mara Gajevska, Appellant, v Teachers’ Retirement System of the City of New York, Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 669]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered May 1, 2012, which, inter alia, denied the petition seeking a judgment that petitioner was entitled to either a determination of *her*rights as contingent beneficiary under the qualified pension plan (QPP) of Steven J. Brown (decedent), that she was entitled to the payment of benefits as contingent beneficiary under the QPP of decedent, or directing respondent to pay petitioner benefits as a contingent beneficiary of the QPP of decedent, and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered April 23, 2012, which granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that, inter alia, plaintiff was entitled to the subject retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The parties agree that the four-month statute of limitations controls this action, which challenges an agency determination. *425The court properly determined that petitioner/plaintiff was provided with notice by respondent on September 18, 2009 that she would not receive the member’s retirement benefits as a contingent beneficiary because he died prior to his retirement date, and that the designated in-service beneficiary was entitled to the benefits. The court properly found that petitioner failed to file a proceeding to challenge that determination within the requisite four-month period (CPLR 217 [1]). Concur — Andrias, J.P, Acosta, Moskowitz, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 36 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that congressional 

redistricting should be reformed to remove political gerrymandering. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mr. LOWENTHAL (for himself and Mr. FITZPATRICK) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

congressional redistricting should be reformed to remove 

political gerrymandering. 

Whereas political gerrymandering occurs when politicians 

draw their own congressional district lines to protect 

their self-interest at the expense of creating districts that 

reflect communities of interest; 

Whereas political gerrymandering can result in decreased 

electoral competition between congressional candidates, 

and in turn decreased responsiveness by Members of 

Congress to their voters’ interests; 

Whereas political gerrymandering can be used to split or pack 

certain demographic and political groups into congressional districts in order to disproportionately diminish 

their representation in Congress; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 36 IH 

Whereas political gerrymandering can be used to protect the 

majority party and punish the minority party; 

Whereas political gerrymandering can decrease Americans’ 

faith and trust in congressional elections; 

Whereas political gerrymandering is generally harmful to our 

democracy; 

Whereas many States have taken great strides to ameliorate 

political gerrymandering, ranging from Hawaii and California to Arizona and Ohio; 

Whereas the United States Constitution provides the authority for Congress to regulate elections and redistricting; 

and 

Whereas the Supreme Court has affirmed Congress’ authority 

provided in the United States Constitution to regulate 

elections and redistricting: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that congressional redistricting should be re3 formed to remove political gerrymandering. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Document

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. (“ARC”) and JORGE AVALOS (“Executive”) agree to enter into this AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment No. 4”) dated as of June 29, 2022 (“Effective Date”). 
RECITALS
    WHEREAS, ARC and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 2014, as amended and restated on February 1, 2015 and June 9, 2015, as subsequently amended (“Executive Agreement”), under which Executive was employed as Chief Financial Officer.  All capitalized terms in this Amendment No. 4 not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Executive Agreement.

    WHEREAS, the parties now wish to amend certain terms of the Executive Agreement as of the Effective Date.
    Now, therefore, in consideration of the promises, covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment No. 4, the parties agree as follows:
1.Compensation. 
(a)Section 5 as set forth below is hereby added to Appendix B to the Executive Agreement:
5.Annual Long Term Equity Incentive Award.  Executive shall be eligible to receive Annual Long Term Equity Incentive Awards of $100,000 per fiscal year, payable in the form of a stock option award to Executive under ARC's 2021 Incentive Plan, to be approved by the Compensation Committee of ARC's Board of Directors at the first meeting of the Compensation Committee following the close of each fiscal year.   The number of shares subject to such option shall be determined based on the Black-Scholes valuation model (taking into account the closing price of ARC's common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant) and shall vest in equal installments of twenty-five percent (25%) on each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to Executive's continued employment with ARC on each vesting date.
Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment No. 4, the Executive Agreement remains in full force and effect without modification.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment No. 4 as of the date first hereinabove set forth. 
						
	ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, INC.


By:        
     Dilantha Wijesuriya


Title:  President and Chief Operating Officer
	EXECUTIVE


By:  ______________________________
Jorge Avalos





1
Exhibit 23



                         CONSENT of Independent Auditors

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  following  Registration
Statements  of The Black & Decker  Corporation  of our report dated  January 26,
1999, with respect to the consolidated  financial statements and schedule of The
Black & Decker  Corporation  included in the Annual  Report  (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1998.


Registration Statement Number               Description
-----------------------------               ----------- 
33-6610                                     Form S-8
33-6612                                     Form S-8
33-26917                                    Form S-8
33-26918                                    Form S-8
33-33251                                    Form S-8
33-39608                                    Form S-3
33-47651                                    Form S-8
33-47652                                    Form S-8
33-53807                                    Form S-3
33-58795                                    Form S-8
33-65013                                    Form S-8
333-03593                                   Form S-8
333-03595                                   Form S-8
333-51155                                   Form S-8
333-51157                                   Form S-8


/s/ERNST & YOUNG                                                     


Baltimore, Maryland
March 9, 1999
° Copy of the trial record Te iwielade >but net Limited ts the
. trensens pts, reporters record, pelice repert in order fs Le
- aN Adequate PAR » Also, if this NEF posse ble & he assrqued
- Caeisel Chy He court) te assist him mWithe Flug of ths PAR,
Prager
Applicant prays Po~ relret,

. Res ai Subimithed

sbdd Rel. Ralero* 1848 915
» Co@ietd Uw
_ ebl EM2054

- Tennessee Colony ke. 1588 4-S000

: pre set Applicant

Execetod / Sig wed on—l-7-1F


83, SaS- 4!

Duly T-2ers

Abel Neasty . Clon RECEIVED IN
. \ COURT M
| Couwk ae Calm wal App «. i Vfezas OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 13 2015
~ AO. dex 2268, Cap ste
7 Rerstiny, To 78111 Abel Acosta, Clerk

Res Ex Paste /2eey Ralero Cause Ne. 20ll-43/, 152 “A
-3bu Mistict Coat of Lubhack Const 7) Texas »

. Habens Compas Refifion Unde TOD Art eT

Howorable Acasta 2

Exclased Lid Appli canits Res pduse to the Courts -
- Ainiding of Facds tnd Cometitton of Law oPLease Cle aud
- bring the aiteaton of the Cows.
—— Applizand ia-this pleading :& aw indigemt, prose, sarah avi
~ eat mecditim 6 exchange fo pay forespres, and. pleads the Alen,
Acasta. Parrish any sther copies regurred hey Lous ar practice.
Thank You Forte Time. And Kindwess IN Thes Ma ter.

Rew ec. SL Lley
ZL Balen 12 489 ie

CO Ubsit
2b FM Es
Teainexsem_ Coloaiy Tn, 8B 4

pro se ! Applicant


TN The Gart oP Caminal Aooeals

of
Texas

Foam The. 364% Disticd Court

Lubbock Coonty Texas
Trial Cause Ne. 26 (1-431,252,

Habeas Corpus Relihan Ne Zel- 431,25 2-A
Apolicants Respeuse.
Te
The. Courts

Finding of Facts aad Comelusron of Law

“sey RaLlere 348%
Cae Unit

eet FMrs4
Tensessee Colony, Tkr 75884

pre se! Applicant



‘ Ln the. Cased of Crt mival Appeals of lexae.

~Réspouse To the Cast Fnlinige af Fact-Dnlasselsriant of Low

Bb the. Uowerable Medae at The @C.A°

oa
Ex parte. Lnithe 264th Nest. Bart
of
Seey Ralero Lubbock Cocsstly } lexns
TE

_ Comes Meus, Teesy RaLleve TDCAA-CED No. [R481 (Applicant
~ aad Giles this His Response Te The. Courts Bind teags of Peed and con-

- ChetsioN oF Laws (Fi ECL dated Rawe 25 2ors, and all sfowas
Polos,

. hr a
. Dn the cous FRGL the coat clatms Hat Apolicaut should he
+ Geastied veleat vequesied on His Habeas Writ under TCC, D, Art,

= ter. His issue. Reethe gretling file ant oaf--of-tme_ Deb fins
For Nserchowany reureno CPR,
- oY a
Applica arques that dae tothe. delay t and vot recieving .
- the sixfes Auswer or Courtis Conclusion of Law of His
Origival Challange ON Diet Appeal He is initled  atee

Page Lole_
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2880] 

A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). Oppositions to this petition must be filed by January 23, 2009. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired. 

*Subject:*                     In the Matter of An Inquiry into the Commission's Policies and Rules Regarding AM Radio Service Directional Antenna Performance Verification (MM Docket No. 93-177).                 

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-142 Filed 1-7-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P (the
      “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Halbert S. Washburn, Co-Chief Executive Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLC, the
      general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.




/s/
                  HALBERT S. WASHBURNHalbert
                  S. Washburn*Co-Chief
                  Executive Officer of BreitBurn GP,
                  LLC*


Dated:
      May 12, 2008
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-H  ("Issuer") for the period
ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"):

(a)  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

         Dated this 15th day of May, 2003.

                          GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                          PARTNERSHIP II-H
                          ("Issuer")

                          //s// Dennis R. Neill
                          -----------------------------------
                          Dennis R. Neill
                          President (Chief Executive Officer)

                          //s// Craig D. Loseke
                          -----------------------------------
                          Craig D. Loseke
                          Chief Accounting Officer
                          (Chief Financial Officer)


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-H and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-H and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

TYRONE MILLER,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 559 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Howard Grubstein, Appellant.

Submitted September 3, 2013;

decided September 12, 2013

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard L. Herzfeld, Esq., 104 West 40th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10018 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1064 TP 10-00450**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF TOMMY HERRIN, PETITIONER,

V ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES AND D.S.A. BULSON, HEARING OFFICER, MID-STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENTS.

TOMMY HERRIN, PETITIONER PRO SE.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARTIN A. HOTVET OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County [Samuel D. Hester, J.], entered January 4, 2010) to review a determination of respondents. The determination found after a Tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Entered: November 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
Exhibit No. 21

 

List of Subsidiaries

 

 

The subsidiaries of Barnwell Industries, Inc., at September 30, 2010 were:

 

 
|                                     |   | Jurisdiction of               |
|------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Name of Subsidiary                       |   | Incorporation or Organization |
| Barnwell of Canada, Limited              |   | Delaware                      |
| Water Resources International, Inc. |   | Delaware                      |
| Barnwell Hawaiian Properties, Inc.  |   | Delaware                      |
| Barnwell Kona Corporation                |   | Hawaii                        |
| Kaupulehu Developments                   |   | Hawaii                        |
| Cambridge Hawaii Limited Partnership     |   | Hawaii                        |
| Barnwell Management Co., Inc.       |   | Delaware                      |
| Barnwell Shallow Oil, Inc.          |   | Delaware                      |
| Barnwell Geothermal Corporation          |   | Delaware                      |
| Victoria Properties, Inc.           |   | Delaware                      |
| Barnwell Financial Corporation           |   | Delaware                      |
| Barnwell Alakea Properties, Inc.    |   | Hawaii                        |
| Kaupulehu Investors, LLC                 |   | Hawaii                        |
| Mauka 3K, LLC                            |   | Hawaii                        |
| Kaupulehu Mauka Investors, LLC           |   | Hawaii                        |
| Kaupulehu 2007, LLLP                     |   | Hawaii                        |
| Barnwell Makai, Inc.                |   | Hawaii                        |
| Barnwell of Israel, Ltd.            |   | Israel                        |
| Barnwell Oil & Gas, Ltd.   |   | Israel                        |
| Bill Robbins Drilling, Ltd.         |   | Alberta, Canada               |
| Gypsy Petroleum Ltd.                     |   | Alberta, Canada               |
| Dartmouth Petroleum, Ltd.           |   | Alberta, Canada               |
| J.H. Wilson Associates, Ltd.        |   | Alberta, Canada               |

 

108

----
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Base Ten Systems, Inc.
Trenton, New Jersey 08619

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
33-89712, No. 33-60454, No. 33-55752, No. 333.721; No. 33-21925 and Amendment
No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 2-84451 of Base Ten Systems, Inc. and
Subsidiaries on Form S-8 and the Registration Statement No. 33-89710, No.
333-719, No. 333-34159, and No. 333-31335 of Base Ten Systems, Inc. and
Subsidiaries on Form S-3 of our report dated February 6, 1998, appearing in this
annual report on Form 10-K of Base Ten Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the
year ended October 31, 1997.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
February 9, 1998