alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3356 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 

children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2010 

Mr. FEINGOLD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

maximum age for children eligible for medical care under 

the CHAMPVA program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE FOR CHILDREN 

4 ELIGIBLE FOR MEDICAL CARE UNDER 

5 CHAMPVA PROGRAM. 

6 (a) INCREASE.—Section 1781(c) of title 38, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘twenty-three’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘twenty-six’’; and 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3356 IS

1 (2) by striking ‘‘twenty-third birthday’’ and in2 serting ‘‘twenty-sixth birthday’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to medical care pro5 vided on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

6 SEC. 2. CANCELLATION OF HUMAN LUNAR MISSION UNDER 

7 CONSTELLATION PROGRAM OF NATIONAL 

8 AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection 

10 (b), the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and 

11 Space Administration may not obligate or expend any 

12 amount to support a human lunar mission, including any 

13 such mission under the Constellation Program of the Ad14 ministration. 

15 (b) EXCEPTION.—The Administrator may use 

16 amounts obligated or otherwise made available before the 

17 date of the enactment of this Act for a human lunar mis18 sion, including amounts for a human lunar mission under 

19 the Constellation Program, to wind down any activity or 

20 operations related to such mission. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
{"agency":"NIGC","generated":"2017-01-27 13:40:09","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"}],"value":"2017"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["NIGC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["13"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["14"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["36"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2017","quarter":"Q1"}
ACCEPTED

01-15-00603-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/14/2015 10:28:41 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/14/2015 10:28:41 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apogent Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank H. Jellinek, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Frank H. Jellinek Jr.                                       
|Frank H. Jellinek, Jr. Chief Executive Officer February 13, 2002



This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
96-2515.

#### State ex rel. Ochs v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 95APD10-1359.

This cause is pending before the court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of the application of appellants/cross-appellees for dismissal of their appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal of the appeal be, and hereby is, granted.

The cross-appeal of Rodney Ochs remains pending.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that cross-appellant’s brief is due March 10, 1997.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 10, 2015

NO. 03-14-00694-CV

Anthony Passeur, Appellant

v.

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on October 7, 2014. Appellant has

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the 

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
# Director’s Innovation Speaker Series: Diagnosing Resilience: A Multisystemic Model for Positive Development in Stressed Environments

### ** Date      

## Overview

Using examples from his research and clinical practice, Dr. Michael Ungar, Ph.D., explored the nature of young people’s patterns of resilience in contexts where children and adolescents are affected by social marginalization, migration, violence, and mental disorder. His work is demonstrating that resilience can be assessed with sensitivity to culture and context, identifying factors that are most likely to have the greatest impact on behavioral outcomes at different levels of risk exposure. Dr. Ungar’s program of research provides support for an ecological, culturally sensitive interpretation of what resilience means to young people who experience extreme forms of adversity.

In this lecture, Dr. Ungar showed that resilience results from both individual abilities to overcome adversity and the capacity of social and physical ecologies, including mental health care providers, to help young people navigate and negotiate their way to the resources they need to build and sustain well-being. Finally, aspects of hidden resilience (maladaptive coping) will be discussed as reasonable ways young people protect themselves from risk when growing up in challenging contexts.

## Recording

Read the transcript.

## About Dr. Michael Ungar

Dr. Michael Ungar is the founder and director of the Resilience Research Centre and Canada Research Chair in Child, Family and Community Resilience at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada. He is the former chair of the Nova Scotia Mental Health and Addictions Strategy, executive board member of the American Family Therapy Academy, and a family therapist who continues to work with mental health services for individuals and families at risk. His international series of studies spans six continents and has changed the way resilience is understood, shifting the focus from individual traits to the interactions between individuals and their social, institutional, built, and natural environments, including health and social services.

## About the Director’s Innovation Speaker Series

The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) established the Director’s Innovation Speaker Series to encourage broad, interdisciplinary thinking in the development of scientific initiatives and programs, and to press for theoretical leaps in science over the continuation of incremental thought. Innovation speakers are encouraged to describe their work from the perspective of breaking through existing boundaries and developing successful new ideas, as well as working outside their primary area of expertise in ways that have pushed their fields forward. We encourage discussions of the meaning of innovation, creativity, breakthroughs, and paradigm-shifting.

## Sponsored by

Division of Extramural Activities

## More Information

Submit general questions to the NIMH Director’s Innovation Speaker Series mailbox.
#### Sherman *v.*Nutt.

*(Circuit Court, D. Connecticut.*

May 23, 1888.)

Patents foe Inventions—Threatened Infringement—Injunction.

Under Rev. St. U. S. § 4921, providing that “the several courts vested with, jurisdiction of cases arising under the patent laws shall have power to grant injunctions, according to the course and principles of courts of equity, to prevent the violation of any right secured by patent, ” a bill in equity will lie in the circuit court between parties who are residents of the same state to prevent an anticipated infringement of a patent, no infringement having actually occurred.

In EquitjT. On demurrer to bill.

Suit brought by George B. Sherman against Joseph Nutt to restrain infringement of a patent.

*Wm, Edgar*Simonds, for plaintiff.

*Morris W. Seymour,*for defendant.

Shipman, J.

This is a general demurrer to a bill in equity for an injunction against the infringement of letters patent, which are owned by the plaintiff. The patent is for an improvement which was jointly invented by the plaintiff'and defendant, who made joint application for a patent. Pending the application, the defendant assigned to the plaintiff all his interest in said invention and said patent. The parties are citizens of this state. The bill alleges that the defendant is now constructing, in this state, a machine, with full intent to use the same, in infringement of said patent, and it is infringing and will infringe upon *150the plaintiff’s exclusive rights thereunder. The demurrer is upon the ground—it being admitted that this court has jurisdiction of the cause only by reason of its subject-matter, and that the jurisdiction of the court is such only as is authorized or conferred by the statutes of the United States,—that a bill in equity, in the circuit court, between parties who are residents of the same state will not lie to prevent an anticipated infringement, no infringement having actually occurred. Section 4921 of the Revised Statutes provides that “the several courts vested with jurisdiction of cases arising under the patent laws shall have power to grant injunctions according to the course and principles of courts of equity, to prevent the violation of any right secured by patent.” In iny opinion the suit is one arising under the patent laws of the United States, and is properly brought. “The case is not like that of an action at law for the breach of a patent, to support which it is indispensable to establish a breach before the suit was brought.” “A bill will lie for an injunction if the patent right is admitted, or has been established, upon well-grounded proof of an apprehended intention to violate the patent right.” *Woodworth*v. *Stone,*3 Story, 749. The same doctrine is declared in *Poppenhusen*v. *Comb Co.,*4 Blatchf. 184.

The demurrer is overruled.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the filing by Camelot Corporation (the "Company") of the
Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  April  30,  2005  (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operation of the Company.







                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  July 28, 2005
Chairwoman LaRue Paiker 

Caddo Nation of OkIahoma 

P.O. Box 487 

Binger, OK 73009 

RE: Amendments to the Caddo Nation Gaming Ordinance 

Dear Chairwoman Parker: 

This letter is in response to your request for the National Indian Gaming 

Commission (NIGC) to review and approve amendments to the Caddo Nation of 

Oklahoma's revised Garming Ordinance, submitted on May 16,2006. The Caddo 

Nation Council approved the Ordinance by Resolution # 05-2006-03 on May 16, 

2006. This letter constitutes approval of your submission under the Indian 

Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA). It is important to note that the Gaming 

Ordinance is approved for gaming only on Indian lands, as defined in the IGRA, 

over which the Tribe has jurisdiction. 

/--? 

the ordinance for review and approval. The NIGC staff 

with you and the Nation on future gaming issues. 

Chairman 

NATHJNAL HEADQUA~S 1441 L St. NW. Suite 9100. Whington, DC 2000~ Tel: 202.632.Xu3 Fax: 202.632.7066 www.u~c.~av 

REGIONAL OF- %eland. OR; Sacramento. CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul. MN;Tuisa. OK 
1 (605) 656-2344 405-656-2345 

FAX # 4051056-2892 

\, s, 

RESOLUTION AMENQMG THE '~kbb~ &ATION GAMING ORDINANCE 

IN ACCORDANCE WJTB[ JITLE 1, SECTION 108 

OF THE GAMING O~DINANCE PASSED ' 

BY RESOLUTION 12-94-02 ... . . 

... .... .->. 1.1, 

8. 

,< . - . . ,:,., ' ' '.. ... .ji. :;:' .. ,; * - ..!:, - ,, ..... ..... :: -.. , , 

. . .<, ,$7?Jq.!,:+:k :; .. . . .., :&p.$:<', .:.$, .. .: 

-\ <r-.. '. 

WHEREAS: The ~adddhtion k 0~ahoma in /&+pacity as a sovereign federally 

. . 

ac&rdancc Article V, 

contracts or :I&iy+edments 

WEEREAS: 

or 

. . ... ,.. .. 

WHEREAS: ~he~addo Nation Gaming ~rdi*'&sdo~ted on bk ber'l5,1994 by 

No. 1 2-94-02 provides p e 5 Section 108 

amended by a,mpjPiity we of the Tribal 

Council. ! , .. . :: 

NOW ']TIBEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Caddo Nation Council hereby 

amends the Caddo Nation Gaming Ordinance Section 2, Part 2.1 to read 

that the Commission consists of Five (5) members instead of Eight (8) 

members..
#### ALLSTATE INS. CO. v. CROSS et al.

No. 1489.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

Nov. *7,*1941.

Sylvia E. Detweiler and George H. Detweiler, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Jacob Boonin and Rebecca D. Boonin, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant Cross.

John V. McDonald, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants Maher.

BARD, District Judge.

Peter Joseph Maher, a minor, was injured by the automobile of Frank O. Cross, who was insured against liability by the plaintiff insurance company. Some time thereafter plaintiff filed this action against Cross, Maher and his parents for a declaratory judgment that at the time of the injury to the minor defendant, Cross was carrying passengers for hire within the meaning of a provision relieving the insurer from liability under such circumstances.

Answers to the complaint were filed by the Mahers and by Cross, both of which denied that Cross was carrying passengers for hire at the time of the accident. In the concluding paragraph of Mahers’ answer they stated: “Wherefore, the defendants Maher pray that the issues raised by the complaint and answer be submitted for determination by a jury as provided by the Act of Congress under which these proceedings are brought.”

No endorsement demanding a jury trial appeared on this answer, however, and the answer of Cross contained no demand for jury trial by either prayer or endorsement. The case having appeared on the non-jury trial list several months later, defendants promptly filed petitions for a jury trial.

Section 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, provides: “Any party may demand a trial by jury of any issue triable of right by a jury by serving upon the other parties a demand therefor in writing at any time after the commencement of the action and not later than 10 days after the service of the last pleading directed to such issue. Such demand may be endorsed upon a pleading of the party.”

While the endorsement of a demand for jury trial on the pleading would seem to be better practice, as it would tend to avoid such confusion as arose in the present case, I am of the opinion that the last paragraph of the Maher answer does constitute a demand in writing within the meaning of Rule 38(b).

Even if defendants had failed to make proper demand for a jury trial of the factual question presented, this court has discretion, under Rule 39(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to grant a jury trial in an action in which such a demand might have been made of right. In an action for a declaratory judgment by an automobile liability insurer to determine its liability under its policy a jury trial may be had as of right. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. of Illinois v. Timms & Howard, Inc., et al., 2 Cir., 1939, 108 F-.2d 497. Under the circumstances of this case, I think defendants should be permitted a jury trial.

Petitions granted.
1Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-31343

Summary Calendar

MOHD RIBHE MAHMOUD,

Petitioner-Appellant,

VERSUS

IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, 

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(97-CV-642)

November 12, 1998

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 27 

Expressing the sense of the House that more should be done to instill 

Holocaust education in school curricula around the country. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, and 

Ms. BONAMICI) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House that more should be 

done to instill Holocaust education in school curricula 

around the country. 

Whereas more than 70 years after the conclusion of World 

War II, it is even more important now to remember the 

events of the Holocaust and the genocidal pursuits of the 

Nazi regime; 

Whereas troubling numbers of people are ignorant of the 

events of the Holocaust and there are even those who 

deny that the Holocaust occurred; 

Whereas lies continue to be spread with the goal of perpetuating racist, xenophobic, and anti-Semitic principles; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 27 IH 

Whereas these insensitive beliefs are all too common, and 

only serve to dishonor those that were persecuted, tortured, and killed at the hands of the Nazis; 

Whereas with each passing year we lose some of our greatest 

ambassadors and storytellers as Holocaust survivors age 

and pass away; 

Whereas in the words of Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel, not 

all victims were Jews, but all Jews were victims; 

Whereas many Members of Congress are proud to represent 

large populations of survivors in each of their districts; 

Whereas too many students are graduating with little exposure to Holocaust education and its universal relevance; 

Whereas education about this tragedy is our best defense 

against intolerance and bigotry, and against history repeating itself; 

Whereas we are proud that 11 States require by law that 

schools teach students about the Holocaust and the lessons that can be learned from that tragic chapter of history; and 

Whereas Congress has consistently acted to preserve the 

memory of the Holocaust, including establishing a national Holocaust Remembrance Day in 1978: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the House of Representatives— 

3 (A) commends Holocaust education activ4 ists on their longstanding efforts to include 

5 Holocaust education in States’ public school 

6 curricula across the country; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 27 IH 

1 (B) encourages more States and school dis2 tricts to include Holocaust education in their 

3 curricula and support continued efforts to move 

4 this initiative forward; and 

5 (2) it is the sense of the House of Representa6 tives that more should be done to instill in the Na7 tion’s schools the promise that we will never forget 

8 the horrors of the Holocaust and must always work 

9 to prevent such atrocities from occurring in the fu10 ture. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# Multimedia About Social Anxiety Disorder

Ashley Smith, Ph.D., Winner of the 2017 NIMH Three-Minute Talks Competition

Webinar: RDoC - Fear & Anxiety: From Mechanisms to Implementation