alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 347 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 347

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to distinguish between the severity of a qualifying 
 loss of a dominant hand and a qualifying loss of a non-dominant hand 
for purposes of traumatic injury protection under Servicemembers' Group 
                Life Insurance, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 29, 2009

 Mr. Ensign (for himself and Mr. Rockefeller) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to distinguish between the severity of a qualifying 
 loss of a dominant hand and a qualifying loss of a non-dominant hand 
for purposes of traumatic injury protection under Servicemembers' Group 
                Life Insurance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF LOSS OF DOMINANT HAND IN PRESCRIPTION OF 
              SCHEDULE OF SEVERITY OF TRAUMATIC INJURY UNDER 
              SERVICEMEMBERS' GROUP LIFE INSURANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1980A(d) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Payments under'' and inserting ``(1) 
        Payments under''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) As the Secretary considers appropriate, the schedule required 
by paragraph (1) may distinguish in specifying payments for qualifying 
losses between the severity of a qualifying loss of a dominant hand and 
a qualifying loss of a non-dominant hand.''.
    (b) Payments for Qualifying Losses Incurred Before Date of 
Enactment.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
        prescribe in regulations mechanisms for payments under section 
        1980A of title 38, United States Code, for qualifying losses 
        incurred before the date of the enactment of this Act by reason 
        of the requirements of paragraph (2) of subsection (d) of such 
        section (as amended by subsection (a)(2) of this section).
            (2) Qualifying loss defined.--In this subsection, the term 
        ``qualifying loss'' means--
                    (A) a loss specified in the second sentence of 
                subsection (b)(1) of section 1980A of title 38, United 
                States Code; and
                    (B) any other loss specified by the Secretary of 
                Veterans Affairs pursuant to the first sentence of that 
                subsection.
                                 <all>
```
97-688.

#### State v. Cordosi.

Clark App. No. 95CA0126. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the question certified by the court of appeals at page 3 of its Decision and Entry filed March 5,1997:

> “The question certified to the Ohio Supreme Court is as follows:

> “Whether a finding pursuant to Evid.R. 601(A) that a child under ten years of age is incompetent to testify at trial makes that child’s testimony ‘not reasonably obtainable’ for purposes of Evid.R. 802(A)(2) under the standards set out in Evid.R. 807(B)(2), rendering admissible an out-of-court statement that the child allegedly made describing a sexual act or act of violence performed with or on, or directed against, the child.” [The conflict case is *State v. Black*(1993), 87 Ohio App.3d 724, 622 N.E.2d 1166.]

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.
#### Hovsep Gregorian, Respondent, v New York Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

Submitted June 4, 2012;

decided June 28, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 274 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 274

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         April 2, 2019.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 7) to direct the removal 
of United States Armed Forces from hostilities in the Republic of Yemen that 
have not been authorized by Congress. All points of order against consideration 
of the joint resolution are waived. The joint resolution shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution and 
on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 
one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs; and (2) one motion to 
commit.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order without 
intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the resolution (H. 
Res. 271) Condemning the Trump Administration's Legal Campaign to Take Away 
Americans' Health Care. The resolution shall be considered as read. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution and preamble to 
adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the question 
except one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
    Sec. 3.  It shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of April 4, 
2019, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules as 
though under clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or her designee shall consult with 
the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter for 
consideration pursuant to this section.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 10.1 - Exhibit G-4 Form of Exemption Certificate for Participant Non-Partnership






EXHIBIT G-4
FORM OF EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE
(For Non-U.S. Participants That Are Not Partnerships For U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes)
Reference is made to the Credit Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2013 (as amended, supplemented, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”; unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among M/I HOMES, INC., an Ohio corporation (the “Borrower”), the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties thereto as lenders, including the Swingline Lender and the Issuing Lender (collectively, the “Lenders”), PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as administrative agent for the Lenders (the “Administrative Agent”) and the other agents party thereto.  The undersigned is providing this certificate pursuant to Section 2.16(d) of the Credit Agreement.  The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that:
1.    It is the sole record and beneficial owner of the participation in respect of which it is providing this certificate;
2.    It is not a “bank” for purposes of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Code;  
3.    It  is not a 10-percent shareholder of the Borrower within the meaning of Section 871(h)(3)(B) of the Code;
4.    It is not a controlled foreign corporation related to the Borrower within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(C) of the Code; and
5.    The interest payments in question are not effectively connected with the undersigned's conduct of a U.S. trade or business.
The undersigned has furnished its participating Lender with a certificate of its non-U.S. Person status on IRS Form W-8BEN.  By executing this certificate, the undersigned agrees that (1) if the information provided on this certificate changes, the undersigned shall promptly so inform such Lender and (2) the undersigned shall have at all times furnished such Lender with a properly completed and currently effective certificate in either the calendar year in which each payment is to be made to the undersigned, or in either of the two calendar years preceding such payments.
[Signature page follows.]









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this certificate to be duly executed and delivered as of the date indicated below.
[NAME OF PARTICIPANT]
By:_______________________________
Name:
Title:
Date:  ____________________
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

***Certificationof the Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act***

 

I, Paul M. Ferguson, President, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Solera National Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; and

 

(b) Reserved

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any changes inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially effect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 14, 2008 | /s/ Paul M. Ferguson          |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                       | Paul M. Ferguson              |
|                       | President                     |
|                       | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment to
Registration Statement No. 33-13901, and in Registration Statement Nos.
33-73696, 33-73698, 33-73700, 333-17349 and 333-17351 of Barr Laboratories, Inc.
on Form S-8 of our reports dated August 7, 2000, appearing in and incorporated
by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Barr Laboratories, Inc. for
the year ended June 30, 2000.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
August 17, 2000


                                                                              33
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00254-CV

Combined Financial Holdings Trust, Appellant

v.

The County of Bastrop, Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 11,884, HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER DARROW DUGGAN, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Combined Financial Holdings Trust, through its Trustee William H.

Mikulin, filed its notice of appeal on April 24, 2015. On June 16, 2015, the Clerk of this Court sent

a letter notifying appellant that the clerk’s record was overdue and requesting that it make payment

arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report regarding this appeal. The overduerecord notice also informed appellant that failure to make payment arrangements or respond to

the Court’s notice by June 26, 2015, could subject this appeal to dismissal for want of prosecution. 

To date, the clerk’s record in this cause has not been filed and the district clerk

has not received any payment. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).
__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: July 10, 2015
EX-10.1






EXHIBIT 10.1


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
USEC INC. PENSION RESTORATION PLAN
(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2008)


WHEREAS, the USEC Inc. Pension Restoration Plan (“Plan”) was amended and restated effective January 1, 2008; and further amended by the First Amendment dated August 1, 2008 and by resolution of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on January 10, 2013; and
WHEREAS, a further amendment is desired in order to freeze the benefits accrued under the Plan effective August 5, 2013;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows, effective August 5, 2013:
I.
A new Section 1.4 is added to read as follows:
1.4.  Plan Frozen August 5, 2013.  The Qualified Plan (as defined in Section 1.2) was amended to freeze accruals thereunder effective August 5, 2013.  Accordingly, benefits under the Plan also became frozen as of August 5, 2013.
II.
Section 4.1 is amended and restated to read as follows:
4.1  Amount of Benefits.  The benefit payable under this Plan to the Participant with respect to Non-Grandfathered Benefits shall not increase after August 5, 2013, and accordingly shall be equal to the difference between the amount in (1) and the amount in (2) where - 
(1)    is the amount of the retirement benefit that would be payable under the Qualified Plan as of August 5, 2013 in the form of a single life annuity beginning at the Participant's Retirement, before the application of the Section 401 Limits in effect on August 5, 2013 and the Section 415 Limits in effect on August 5, 2013 and by taking into account “Compensation” (as defined or interpreted under the Plan) earned as of August 5, 2013, or deferred as of August 5, 2013 by a Participant under the terms of any nonqualified deferred compensation plan maintained by the Corporation;
(2)    is the amount of the benefit actually payable as of August 5, 2013 under the Qualified Plan commencing at the Participant's Retirement in the form of a single life annuity.









The amount payable as Non-Grandfathered Benefits shall be the difference between the amount determined above and the amount of the Grandfathered Benefits.
III.
Section 4.2 is amended by adding the following at the end thereof:
The form of payment for Non-Grandfathered Benefits previously elected by the Participant under this Section 4.2 shall not be affected by the August 5, 2013 freeze in Plan benefits or any change in the form of benefit available under the Qualified Plan.
IV.
Section 4.3 is amended by adding the following at the end thereof:
The commencement date for Non-Grandfathered Benefits under Section 4.3 shall not be affected by the August 5, 2013 freeze in Plan benefits or any change in the time of payment under the Qualified Plan.
V.
Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


Executed this 25th day of July, 2013


	
		
	 
	USEC INC.

	ATTEST:
	 

	By: /s/ Peter B. Saba
Senior Vice President, General Counsel,
Chief Compliance Officer 
and Corporate Secretary
	By: /s/ Richard V. Rowland
Vice President, Human Resources
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135362 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 135362 

 COA: 272781 
 Wayne CC: 06-003240-01

RICARDO TOLSON a/k/a RICARDO WADE 

TOLSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
109 EAST HOPKINS STREET

SUITE 200

SAN MARCOS, TEXAS 78666

TEL: (512) 938-1800 www.theerwinlawfirm.com FAX: (512) 938-1804

josh@theerwinlawfirm.com

amanda@theerwinlawfirm.com

July 13, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle

Court of Appeals

Third District of Texas 

P.O. Box 12547

Austin, Texas 78711

Re: Court of Appeals Number: 03-13-00333-CR and 03-13-00334-CR

Trial Court Case Number: CR-12-0141 and CR-13-0053

Dear Mr. Kyle:

This letter is to certify my compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4 in 

the above case. I have already sent the Court compliance, however, that notice was sent to a 

Richard Gonzalez who was not my client, but another Defendant out of Hays County, Texas. I 

sent my client a letter explaining this, and instructions on how to file an extension. Please find a 

copy of the return receipt attached. Please file this letter in your record of the appeal in this case. 

Thank you for your time and please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. 

Sincerely,

/s/ Amanda Erwin

Amanda Erwin

ACCEPTED

03-13-00333-CR

6032079

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/13/2015 10:14:49 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/13/2015 10:14:49 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5, I certify that of July 13, 2105, a copy of 

this letter was delivered via electronic service to: Hays County District Attorney’s 

Office, Appellate Division, 712 South Stagecoach Trail, Suite 2057, San Marcos

Texas, 78666.

/s/ Amanda Erwin

_________________________________

Amanda Erwin
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 13A-14(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Peak Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein
specified (the "Report"), the undersigned, Wilfred Shorrocks, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Wilfred Shorrocks
---------------------
Wilfred Shorrocks
Chief Executive Officer
Date: December 16, 2004
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                            |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. |

|   |   | June 15, 2011                   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|   |   |                            |
|   |   | By: /s/ Jim Poage               |
|   |   |                            |
|   |   | Jim Poage                       |
|   |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer |
# Migraine Trainer® App

Migraine Trainer® is an app developed by NINDS to help teens ages 13+ understand possible causes of their migraines and take a greater role in their treatment by creating an individual migraine management plan with their parents and healthcare providers.

**What does the app do?**

Migraine Trainer provides teens with tools and resources to help them understand their migraine triggers, track their symptoms, and manage a migraine that is underway. Plus, the app gives teens a way to share a headache log with their healthcare provider to help develop a personalized migraine management plan.

**Why did NINDS develop the app?**

Ten percent of kids ages 5-15 have migraines and 90% of pediatric migraine cases are hereditary. Plus, about 1 in 4 younger people with migraines have depression, and 1 in 2 have anxiety.

**What does the research say?**

Many studies have shown that behavioral strategies may be effective in helping kids manage their migraines. Some of these techniques include getting enough sleep, staying hydrated, and lowering stress levels.

**Where can I get the app?**

Migraine Trainer is available for free from the Apple Store and Google Play. Download it today!

For more resources and activities related to brain health and function for parents, students, and teachers, visit the NINDSBrain Educational Resources page.

Migraine Trainer® and the Migraine Trainer® design are marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

**Want to share resources about the app?**

Use these resources to help share information about teen migraine and the Migraine Trainer app with your audiences.