alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 278 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives to recognize the crisis 

of violence against Native women. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2019 

Ms. MOORE (for herself, Ms. HAALAND, Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas, Mr. YOUNG, 

Mr. GRIJALVA, and Mr. COLE) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives to 

recognize the crisis of violence against Native women. 

Whereas according to a study commissioned by the Department of Justice, in some Tribal communities, American 

Indian women face murder rates that are more than 10 

times the national average; 

Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention, homicide was the third-leading cause of death 

among American Indian and Alaska Native women between 10 and 24 years of age and the fifth-leading cause 

of death for American Indian and Alaska Native women 

between 25 and 34 years of age; 

Whereas Native women face some of the highest levels of violence of any group, but there is little data that exists on 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 278 IH 

the number of missing American Indian and Alaska Native women in the United States; 

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives are 2.5 times 

more likely to experience violent crimes and at least 2 

times more likely to experience rape or sexual assault 

crimes than people who are not American Indians or 

Alaska Natives; 

Whereas 96 percent of female and 89 percent of male American Indian and Alaska Native victims report being victimized by a non-Indian; 

Whereas according to a 2010 Government Accountability Office report, the Offices of the United States Attorneys declined to prosecute nearly 52 percent of violent crimes 

that occur in Indian country; 

Whereas Indian Tribes report that children are usually involved in domestic violence and dating violence incidents 

that occur on Indian lands, either as witnesses or as victims themselves; 

Whereas the Indian Law and Order Commission issued a report entitled ‘‘A Roadmap for Making Native America 

Safer’’, which recommends the restoration of the inherent 

authority of Tribal courts; and 

Whereas Tribal communities should be able to protect themselves from dating violence, domestic violence, and child 

violence, and from violence committed against members 

of the Tribal justice system: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives ex2 presses the sense of the House to recognize the crisis of 

3 violence against Native women. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than July 7, 2009.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1. B. Dirk Bagenstos and Lesley D. Bagenstos*, both of Cherokee, Oklahoma; to acquire voting shares of First Keyes Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The First State Bank, both of Keyes, Oklahoma.                

      ( print page 29486)    
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 17, 2009.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-14582 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT I SOUTHERN SURGICAL HOSPITAL VERSUS NO. 2023 CW 0177 MESA LINE SERVICES, LLC AND ESIS, INC. 

### APRIL 24, 2023 In Re:
BEFORE: Proforce, LLC and Starr , Indemnity &

applying for supervisory wtits, Office Compensation, District 6, Noi 22-00788. WELCH, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ. WRIT DENIED.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT JEW AHP WIL Liability, of Workers'
# Director’s Innovation Speaker Series: Cancer Control in the 21st Century with an Emphasis on Risk Reduction

### ** Date      

### ** Location

## Overview

Otis Webb Brawley, M.D.** provided an overview of cancer incidence and mortality trends in populations defined by race, socioeconomic status, area of residence. Looking at the trends, Dr. Brawley discussed what has been learned and how to apply this knowledge to the future. One theme that has emerged is that much of the future of cancer control could be achieved through attention to health behavior. Dr. Brawley discussed his work to reduce over-screening of medical conditions, which has revolutionized patient treatment by increasing quality of life and reducing health disparities. How to optimize cancer screening strategies to increase their effectiveness and efforts to decrease smoking and implement other lifestyle risk reduction programs, and target cancer control efforts in areas where they could be most effective was also discussed.

## Recording

Read the transcript.

## About Dr. Brawley

Dr. Brawley is a Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of Oncology and Epidemiology at Johns Hopkins University. Dr. Brawley leads a broad interdisciplinary research effort regarding cancer health disparities at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, working to close racial, economic, and social disparities in the prevention, detection, and treatment of cancer in the United States and worldwide.

## About the Director’s Innovation Speaker Series

The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) established the Director’s Innovation Speaker Series to encourage broad, interdisciplinary thinking in the development of scientific initiatives and programs, and to press for theoretical leaps in science over the continuation of incremental thought. Innovation speakers are encouraged to describe their work from the perspective of breaking through existing boundaries and developing successful new ideas, as well as working outside their primary area of expertise in ways that have pushed their fields forward. We encourage discussions of the meaning of innovation, creativity, breakthroughs, and paradigm-shifting.

## Sponsored by

Division of Extramural Activities
#### McCarthy *v.*Clark.

*(Circuit Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.*

*May 31,*1888.)

Patents for Inventions — Patentability — Apparatus for Cleaning CessPools.

Claims 1, 4, and 10 of letters patent No. 188,034, issued to William C. McCarthy, April 23, 1873, for an improvement for apparatus for cleaning cesspools, *held,*in view of the state of the art at the date of their issuance, not to describe a patentable invention.

In Equity. Bill to restrain infringement of patent.

The patent referred to in the opinion is No. 138,034, issued to William C. McCarthy, April 22, 1873.

*Wm. L,*Pierce, for complainant.

*T. R. Davis,*for defendant.

Per Curiam.

The patent upon which this suit is founded, is for an improvement for apparatus for cleaning cess-pools, etc., and contains 10 claims, the first, fourth, and tenth of which are involved in this controversy. These three claims, taken together, comprehend the same mechanical elements, and are divided into three only nominally separate combinations. All these elements are old. Not one of them is new; and in view of the state of the art at the date of the patent, which is April *36122, 1873, it is difficult to perceive any patentable merit in them. In the machines then in nse for similar purposes are to be found like mechanical appliances, somewhat different in form, but adapted to perform exactly the same functions. Under these circumstances, the inventive thoughtfulness of the patentee ought to be manifest, and, certainly, his conception ought not to be within the scope of mere mechanical suggestiveness or skill. Upon the ground alone that the claims referred to do not describe a patentable invention, irrespective of the other features of the machine described in the patent, this suit cannot be sustained, and it is therefore unnecessary to consider the question of infringement. The bill is dismissed, with costs.
#### REED v. HICKEY et al.

Civil Action No. 1294.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

July 29, 1941.

Samuel Iv Kratzok, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Morton P. Rome, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant Hickey.

Joseph M. Price, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant Secretary of Banking.

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

As to all the averments essential' to establishing the plaintiff’s cause of action, the answer of the Secretary of Banking either admits them or answers that they are “neither admitted nor denied, but proof thereof is demanded if material.” This is an insufficient denial under the Rules. 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Of course, the Secretary of Banking could' not and would not say that he was without information sufficient to form a belief as to such matters of public knowledge as the closing of the Sixth National Bank (of which he was a stockholder), the appointment of successive receivers, etc. But nothing less than that will raise an issue, and put the plaintiff to proof. Judgment may be entered for the plaintiff against the Secretary of Banking for $1,000 with interest as claimed.

Judgment may also be entered' for the plaintiff against the defendant, James F. Hickey. “ * * * The receiver of a national bank has a right to proceed against both the record and actual owner of the shares of stock in an attempt to collect the liability thereupon imposed. * * * A judgment against either and a satisfaction, of course, would constitute a bar to a judgment against the other. A partial satisfaction would constitute a bar pro tanto.” Ericson v. Slomer, 7 Cir., 94 F.2d 437, 441. Thus, until satisfaction, there may be two judgments.

On Hickey’s “cross-claim” or third party complaint against the Secretary of Banking, the Secretary’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. The only substantial ground for this motion is the matter of jurisdiction. It is true that this Court in one or two earlier cases (decided before the Rules came into effect) ruled against jurisdiction in a similar situation. However, since the Rules, the question has been considered in a number of jurisdictions, and I think that the weight of authority, and the better rule, is that a third party complaint is to be considered ancillary to the main suit. The allowance of the joinder is discretionary, and in most cases makes for simplification of the proceedings.

Orders for judgment in accordance with the foregoing may be submitted.
#### Celluloid Manuf’g Co. *v.*Russell *et al.*

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

April 9, 1888.)

United States Examiners—Taking Testimony Out oe District.

An examiner of the United States circuit court for the Southern district of New York cannot take testimony outside of his district.

In Equity. Motion to strike out testimony.

*J. E. Hindon*Hyde, for complainant.

*H. M. Ruggles,*for defendant.

Lacombe, J.

This is a motion to strike out certain testimony taken before one of the examiners of this district, sitting at Waterbury, Conn. There is nothing in the statutes or rules, or in any reported case, which authorizes a person designated as “examiner of the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of New York” to sit and take testimony outside of his district. The decision cited *(Railroad Co.*v. *Drew,*3 Woods, 697) does not apply; in that case the examiner was specially appointed for the district in which he took the proof. The proper mode of taking testimony in equity cases pending in this circuit is indicated in a memorandum filed this day in *Arnold*v. *Chesebrough, ante,*16.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of LILM, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George I. Norman, III, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/   George I. Norman, III





George I. Norman, III


Chief Executive Officer


Principal Accounting Officer


May 21, 2012











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 33 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress should 

take all appropriate measures to ensure that the United States Postal 

Service remains an independent establishment of the Federal Government 

and is not subject to privatization. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Mr. LYNCH (for himself, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. 

COOK, Mr. MAST, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mrs. MURPHY, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. 

RICHMOND, Mr. LOEBSACK, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. CONNOLLY, and Mrs. 

DAVIS of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

Congress should take all appropriate measures to ensure 

that the United States Postal Service remains an independent establishment of the Federal Government and 

is not subject to privatization. 

Whereas the United States Postal Service is a constitutionally mandated service per article I, section 8, clause 

7 of the Constitution; 

Whereas the United States Postal Service is a self-sustaining, 

independent establishment that does not receive taxpayer 

funding and relies solely on revenue derived from the sale 

of postal services and products; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 33 IH 

Whereas the United States Postal Service and its more than 

500,000 employees are at the center of the $1.4 trillion 

mailing industry, employing a total of 7.5 million Americans; 

Whereas the United States Postal Service serves the needs of 

157 million business and residential customers at least 

six days a week, maintains an affordable and universal 

network, and connects the country’s rural, suburban, and 

urban communities; 

Whereas the United States Postal Service is consistently the 

highest rated agency of the Federal Government in nonpartisan opinion polls; 

Whereas the United States Postal Service is the Nation’s second-largest employer of military veterans; 

Whereas postal employees are dedicated public servants who 

do more than process and deliver the Nation’s mail, they 

serve as the eyes and ears of the Nation’s communities 

and often respond first in situations involving health, 

safety, and crime in their communities; 

Whereas privatization of the United States Postal Service 

would result in higher prices and reduced services for its 

customers, especially in rural communities; and 

Whereas privatization of the United States Postal Service 

would jeopardize the booming e-commerce sector and 

cripple a major part of the Nation’s critical infrastructure: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that Congress should take all appropriate 

3 measures to ensure that the United States Postal Service 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 33 IH 

1 remains an independent establishment of the Federal Gov2 ernment and not subject to privatization. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24.1



                                  POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each individual whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Myles M. Kranzler and Edward J.
Klinsport, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents
with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead in any
and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Base Ten Systems,
Inc. for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1995 and any amendments thereto, and
to file same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done to
comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1934, and all requirements
of the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof. 


                                        
                                        /S/ MYLES M. KRANZLER
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Myles M. Kranzler


                                        /S/ BRUCE D. COWEN
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Bruce D. Cowen


                                        /S/ EDWARD J. KLINSPORT
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Edward J. Klinsport


                                        /S/ ALAN J. EISENBERG
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Alan J. Eisenberg


                                        /S/ ALEXANDER M. ADELSON
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Alexander M. Adelson


                                        /S/ ALAN S. POOLE
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Alan S. Poole


                                        /S/ SUSAN M. KLINSPORT
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Susan M. Klinsport

                                          43
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO

, TEXAS

STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellant

,

v.

RAMON P. ASTORGA, JR.,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00180

- CR

Appeal from the 243rd

Judicial District Court

of El Paso County

, Texas

(TC# 20190D06768 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27 TH DAY OF OCTOBER , 20 2 1.

JEFF ALLEY

, Justice

Before Rodriguez

, C.J.

, Palafox

, and Alley

, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          89,965
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,147
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,329,128)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,617,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          276,474
<BONDS>                                      4,823,258
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     (482,312)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,617,420
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               727,241
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  445,484
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             473,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (191,741)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (191,741)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                200,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (391,741)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.99)
        

</TABLE>