alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jerry M. Kennelly, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Riverbed Technology, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Riverbed Technology, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                     |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: April 26, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Jerry M. Kennelly                                               |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | Jerry M. Kennelly                                                   |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) |  | 

I, Randy S. Gottfried, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Riverbed Technology, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Riverbed Technology, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                      |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: April 26, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Randy S. Gottfried                                               |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | Randy S. Gottfried                                                   |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to Riverbed Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Riverbed Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to
which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             710
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,353
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,155
<PP&E>                                             718
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,686
<BONDS>                                            180
<COMMON>                                         5,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,055
<SALES>                                          2,298
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,298
<CGS>                                            1,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (8)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (137)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (119)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        48
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (167)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (167)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

NICHOLE SCOTT, §
§ No. 166, 2015
Defendant Below, §
Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court
§ of the State of Delaware in and
v. § for New Castle County
§
STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 090917609
§
Plaintiff Below, §
Appellee. §

Submitted: July 8, 2015
Decided: July 13, 2015

ORDER

This 13" day of July 2015, it appears to the Court that, on June 4,
2015, the Clerk issued a notice directing the appellant, Nichole Scott, to
show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for Scott’s failure to file
the opening brief. Scott has failed to respond to the notice to show cause
and has not filed the opening brief. Under these circumstances, dismissal of
the appeal is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules
3(b)(2) and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY, THE COURT:

(ax On q
fésfice
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 USC. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FGX International Holdings Limited (the "Company") for the nine and three months ended
September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alec Taylor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|December 7, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ALEC TAYLORAlec Taylor                            
|---------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)

---



QuickLinks
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maria Ester HERNANDEZ-ESPARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40930.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Maria Ester Hernandez-Esparza (Hernandez) appeals her conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after previous deportation. She argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Hernandez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Hernandez contends that *AlmendarezTorres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Hernandez properly concedes that her argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but she raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
ACCEPTED

01-15-00175-cv

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

7/10/2015 9:25:09 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/10/2015 9:25:09 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 6, 2010 

0929 

Order 

 

October 6, 2010 

141280 

CHRISTOPHER DIRLA and APRIL DIRLA, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 141280 

 COA: 292676 

Schoolcraft CC: 06-003811-NI 

SENEY SPIRIT STORE & GAS STATION and 

STACEY STACHNIK, 

Defendants, 

and 

ANDY’S SENEY BAR, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 25, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TREMANE DARNELL CARTHEN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

P. SCOTT; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 21-15063 

D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00227-DAD-EPG 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges. 

Federal prisoner Tremane Darnell Carthen appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown 

Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging 

violations of his constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-15063 

§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Hamilton v. 

Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir. 2011). We vacate and remand. 

On appeal, Carthen submitted objections to the magistrate judge’s finding 

and recommendations and a proposed amended complaint. Carthen claims that 

these documents were not filed in the district court due to his prison’s failure to 

mail the documents. Because Carthen’s proposed amended complaint includes

allegations that may cure the deficiencies noted by the findings and 

recommendations, we vacate the judgment and remand for the district court to 

consider whether Carthen should be allowed to file an amended complaint. 

On remand, the district court should address whether a Bivens remedy exists 

for the various claims Carthen asserts. See Ziglar v. Abbasi, 137 S. Ct. 1843

(2017).

Carthen’s motion to file an amended complaint with this court (Docket Entry 

No. 5) and motion for appointment of counsel (Docket Entry Nos. 8 and 9) are 

denied.

VACATED and REMANDED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Committee Renewal.

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C. Appendix). Following consultation with the General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior has formally renewed the Preservation Technology and Training Board to provide advice and professional oversight to the Secretary and the National Center for Preservation                               ( print page 29517)                            Technology and Training, as authorized by Title IV, Section 404 of Public Law 102-575, October 30, 1992. The specific duties of the Board are to (1) provide leadership, policy advice, and professional oversight to the Center; (2) advise the Secretary on priorities and the allocation of grants among the activities of the Center; and (3) submit an annual report to the President and the Congress.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kirk Cordell, Executive Director, National Center for Preservation Technology and Training, National Park Service, 645 College Avenue, Natchitoches, Louisiana 71457, (318) 356-7444.

Dated: June 3, 2009.

Ken Salazar,

Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. E9-14590 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 224 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Deaf History Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2019 

Mrs. BEATTY (for herself, Ms. NORTON, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. 

MORELLE, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. BROWN of 

Maryland, Mr. COURTNEY, Ms. MOORE, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of 

New York, and Mrs. LURIA) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Deaf History 

Month. 

Whereas the purpose of National Deaf History Month is to 

increase awareness of and express appreciation for the 

many contributions that deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals have made to our society; 

Whereas, according to 2017 Census Bureau estimates, at 

least 11,200,000 individuals in the United States are 

deaf or hard of hearing; 

Whereas Deaf culture is an important part of the fabric of 

our society; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 224 IH 

Whereas deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals have made and 

continue to make numerous contributions to the United 

States; 

Whereas the American School for the Deaf opened in Hartford, Connecticut, on April 15, 1817, as the first public 

school for the deaf in the United States; 

Whereas Gallaudet University was founded on April 8, 1864, 

when President Lincoln signed the charter establishing it 

as the first college for the deaf in the world; 

Whereas, on March 13, 1988, Gallaudet University selected 

its first deaf university president; 

Whereas National Deaf History Month has been observed 

from March 13 to April 15 every year since 1997; and 

Whereas the National Association of the Deaf and the American Library Association support recognizing March 13 to 

April 15 as National Deaf History Month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Deaf History Month; 

4 (2) recognizes the many contributions that deaf 

5 and hard-of-hearing individuals have made to the 

6 United States; and 

7 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

8 to observe National Deaf History Month with appro9 priate programs and activities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Katharine Biscone, Appellant, v JetBlue Airways Corporation, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Decided March 26, 2013

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 118 (Monday, June 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29471-29472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14540]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Application for Appointment in the NOAA Commissioned Officer 
Corps.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-0047.
    Form Number(s): NOAA Forms 56-42; 56-42D.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Number of Respondents: 1,800.
    Average Hours per Response: Application, 2 hours; reference, 15

[[Page 29472]]

minutes; and applicant interview, 5 hours.
    Burden Hours: 2,475.
    Needs and Uses: The NOAA Commissioned Officer Corps is the 
uniformed service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration, a bureau of the United States Department of Commerce. 
The NOAA Corps provides a cadre of professionals trained in 
engineering, earth sciences, oceanography, meteorology, fisheries 
science, and other related disciplines who serve their country by 
supporting NOAA's mission of surveying the Earth's oceans, coasts, and 
atmosphere to ensure the economic and physical well-being of the 
Nation. NOAA Corps officers operate vessels and aircraft engaged in 
scientific missions and serve in leadership positions throughout NOAA. 
Persons wishing to apply for an appointment in the NOAA Commissioned 
Officer Corps must complete an application package.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#395d7140575c52795d565a175e564f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7a38fbea9a2ac87a3a8a4e9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9fdd8cfd0dde6ebd6cacdd2dccbf9d6d4db97dcd6c997ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c381d0a1518232e130f0817190e3c13111e5219130c521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 16, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-14540 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCIS GRANDINETTI,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

FTC SEG. UNIT STAFF; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 07-16339

D.C. No. CV-07-00821-PHXMHM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Mary H. Murguia, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2011** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Francis Grandinetti, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing, under the “three strikes” provision of 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g), his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal

FILED

APR 12 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-16339

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir. 2005).

 We affirm. 

Grandinetti has waived any issue on appeal by failing to make any

arguments in his opening brief. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350

F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not consider any claims that were not

actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”). 

Grandinetti’s requests set forth in letters submitted March 13, 2009 and June

12, 2009 are denied.

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sentry Petroleum Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Iynky Maheswaran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of January, 2009.

| |     |                                                               
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | BY: | IYNKY MAHESWARANIynky Maheswaran, 
Principal Financial Officer





1
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133482 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. 

### Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman, Justices 

### v SC: 133482 COA: 266894 Macomb CC: 2 005-000166-FH FRANK JOHN WEBER, III, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk