alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exh_1039.htm


Exhibit 10.39


 



SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This Second Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement by and between NetSol Technologies, Inc. (“Netsol” or the “Company”) and Boo-Ali Siddiqui (“Executive”), dated July 25, 2013 (the “Employment Agreement”) is entered into effective as of the date indicted below.  Other than the specific amendments enumerated in the Amendment, all of the terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in the full force and effect, and shall not be obviated or affected by this Amendment.







In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall govern.  All capitalized terms contained herein are, unless otherwise stated, as defined in the Agreement.







Now therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:







Section 3.1 shall be amended to read as follows:







3.1           The Company shall pay, effective July 1, 2013, an increase in base salary to One Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($125,000) per year (the "Base Salary"), payable in accordance with the Company policy.  Such salary shall be pro rated for any partial year of employment on the basis of a 365-day fiscal year.  Executive will be eligible for bonuses from time to time as determined by the Board.







A new section 3.10 shall be added to read as follows:







3.10           Executive shall be granted ten thousand shares (10,000) of common stock to vest in equal 25% tranches (2,500) upon the conclusion of each quarter of service.  The shares are granted from the Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan.  The Shares shall be granted in tranches of 2,500 shares on October 1, 2013; the next 2,500 on January 1, 2014; the next 2,500 on April 1, 2014 and the final 2,500 shares on July 1, 2013.


 





  





  











  






The Amendment is agreed to on July 25, 2013, and shall become effective as of the date first written above.


 







 


Employee


 







 


By:  /s/Boo Ali Siddiqui


Boo Ali Siddiqui


 







 


NetSol Technologies, Inc.


 







 


By:  /s/Najeeb Ghauri                                                                          By: /s/Patti L. W. McGlasson


Najeeb Ghauri                                                                                      Patti L. W. McGlasson


Chief Executive Officer                                                     Sr. V.P., Corporate and Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
Exhibit 10.22

 

SUBLEASE TERMINATION AGREEMENT

 

THIS SUBLEASE TERMINATION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into effective as of June 30, 2013 (the “Effective Date”), by and between ADK GEORGIA, LLC, a Georgia limited liability Company (“Sublessor”) and ADK OCEANSIDE OPERATOR, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“Sublessee”).

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Lease (“Master Lease”) dated August 1, 2010, Sublessor leased from William M. Foster (“Lessor”) the premises described and defined in the Master Lease as the Property (the “Property”);

 

WHEREAS, Sublessee subleased that portion of the Property located at 7 Rosewood Avenue, Tybee Island, Georgia consisting of 85 licensed beds (the “Premises”) pursuant to that certain Sublease Agreement and Lessor’s Consent dated as of April 10, 2010 (the “Sublease”);and

 

WHEREAS, Sublessor and Sublessee desire to terminate the Sublease in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, promises, undertakings, and releases herein, the receipt, adequacy, and sufficiency of such consideration being expressly acknowledged, Lessor and Lessee hereby agree as follows:

 

1.                                      The foregoing recital of facts is hereby made a part of this Agreement to the same extent as if fully set forth herein.  All capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them above.

 

2.                                      The Sublease shall terminate, without further action or notice, on the Effective Date at 11:59 p.m.  Each party’s duties and obligations to the other under the Sublease shall terminate as of 11:59 p.m. on the Effective Date.

 

3.                                      This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted under the laws of the State of Georgia.

 

{Signatures on Following Page}

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed and sealed as of the date stated on the first page of this Agreement.

 

 

	
 
    	
SUBLESSOR:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
ADK   GEORGIA, LLC,
    
	
 
    	
a   Georgia limited liability company
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Boyd P. Gentry
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Boyd   Gentry
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
C.E.O.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
SUBLESSEE:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
ADK   OCEANSIDE OPERATOR, LLC,
    
	
 
    	
a   Georgia limited liability company
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Boyd P. Gentry
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Boyd   Gentry
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
C.E.O.
    


 

2
November 19, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NHH-CANAL STREET APARTMENTS, INC., A TEXAS NON-PROFIT 

CORPORATION, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00251-CV V.

HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT AND HARRIS COUNTY 

APPRAISAL DISTRICT APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD, Appellee

________________________________

We order that the court’s former judgment of June 30, 2015, be vacated, set 

aside, and annulled. We further order this court’s memorandum opinion of June 

30, 2015, withdrawn.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, Harris County 

Appraisal District and Harris County Appraisal District Appraisal Review Board, 

signed December 23, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the 

judgment of the court below REVERSED and RENDER judgment that appellant, 

NHH-Canal Street Apartments, Inc., a Texas Non-Profit Corporation, is entitled to 

an ad valorem tax exemption.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee, Harris County Appraisal District and Harris County Appraisal District 

Appraisal Review Board.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of VelaTel Global Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"), I Carlos Trujillo, Chief, Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, as adopted pursuant to §. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 15, 2011
By: /s/ Carlos TrujilloCarlos Trujillo, Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 118 (Monday, June 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14619]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Forest Service

AGENCY: Notice of Resource Advisory Committee, Custer, South Dakota, 
USDA Forest Service.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Law 92-463) and Public Law 110-343, enacted on October 3, 2008, 
reauthorizing and amending the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self 
Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393), the Black Hills National 
Forest Custer County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on 
Wednesday, June 24, 2009 in Custer, South Dakota. The meeting is open 
to the public.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting on June 24, 2009 will begin at 
5:30 p.m. at the Black Hills National Forest Supervisor's Office at 
25041 North Highway 16, Custer, South Dakota. Agenda topics will be 
Project status update and general business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn Kolund, Hell Canyon District 
Ranger and Designated Federal Official, at 605-673-4853.

Lynn Kolund,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9-14619 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7875

STANLEY A. BLAKEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER MCCUEN, Kitchen Officer; MAJOR LYCETT; LIEUTENANT MOORE, Head of discipline committee, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-747-2) Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 5, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley A. Blakey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Stanley A. Blakey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint withoutprejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a) (West Supp. 2001). Because Blakey didnot demonstrate to the district court that he had exhausted administrative remedies or that such remedies were not available, the court’s dismissal of the action, without prejudice, was not an abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc., (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  September 27, 2008, as filed
with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of the date hereof (the "Annual
Report"),  I,  Jeffrey D.  Kastner,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  SS.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    This  Annual   Report  on  Form  10-K  of  the  Company,   to  which  this
certification is attached as an Exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    The information  contained in this Annual Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

                                     /s/ Jeffrey D. Kastner
                                  -------------------------------------
                                  Name: Jeffrey D. Kastner
                                  Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
                                  Date: December 22, 2008

                    The foregoing certificate is provided solely for the purpose
                    of complying with Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
                    2002 and for no other  purpose  whatsoever.  Notwithstanding
                    anything to the  contrary  set forth herein or in any of the
                    Company's previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933,
                    as  amended,  or the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
                    amended,   that  might   incorporate  the  Company's  future
                    filings, including this annual report on Form 10-K, in whole
                    or in part,  this  certificate  shall not be incorporated by
                    reference into any such filings.  A signed  original of this
                    written statement  required by Section 906 has been provided
                    to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
                    furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
                    staff upon request

                                       55
<PAGE>


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 Nos. 333-50132 and 333-75014) pertaining to the 1998 Incentive Compensation
Plan of BKF Capital Group, Inc. of our report dated March 3, 2004, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of BKF Capital Group, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2003 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and incorporation of our report dated March 3, 2004 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of BKF Capital Group, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2003 in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2005.




                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
March 9, 2006
Order entered January 20, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 20 - 00923 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 0092 4 - CR TRENT AARON SELVAGE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On A ppeal from the 296t h Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296 - 81230 - 2020 & 296 - 81231 - 2020 O RDER T he reporter ’ s record was due on December 4 , 2020. When it was not filed, we notified court repo rter Janet Dugger by postcard da ted December 8, 2020 and directed he r to file the record by January 7, 2021 . To date, the reporter ’ s record has not been filed , and we have had no communication from Ms. Dugger. We ORDER court repo rter Janet Dugger to file the reporter ’ s record by February 19 , 202 1

.We DIRECT the Clerk to s e nd copies of th is order to the Honorable John Roach Jr. , Presiding Judge, 2 96th Judi cial District Court ; Janet Dugger , official

cou rt reporter , 2 96th Judi cial District Court ; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D . BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### David TAFT, Jr., Plaintiff, Eddie Risdal, Appellant, Mystery Boy, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Jason SMITH; Matt Royster; Steve Schuck; Fred Scalleta; John Emmett, Appellees.

No. 05-3907.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 23, 2006.

Filed: June 26, 2006.

Eddie Risdal, Cherokee, IA, pro se.

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Risdal appeals the judgment of the district court1 dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Following careful review, we affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
#### Hampia Teddy AQUEREBURU, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-1308.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 6, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 26, 2006.

Ronald D. Richey, Law Office of Ronald D. Richey, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Song E. Park, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILLIAMS, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Hampia Teddy Aquereburu, a native and citizen of Togo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

In his petition for review, Aquereburu challenges the determination that he failed to establish his eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Aquereburu fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that he seeks.

Additionally, we uphold the denial of Aquereburu’s request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum — even though the facts that must be proved are the same — an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” *Camara v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir.2004). Because Aquereburu fails to show that he is eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal.

*253We also find that substantial evidence supports the finding that Aquereburu failed to meet the standard for relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2006). We find that Aquereburu failed to make the requisite showing before the immigration court.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
DENY ; and Opinion Filed September 16 , 2014 . 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 14 - 01157 - CV No. 05 - 14 - 01158 - CV No. 05 - 14 - 01 159 - CV No. 05 - 14 - 01 160 - CV No. 05 - 14 - 01 161 - CV IN RE C.T. AND T.T. , Relator Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13 - 21229 - U Trial Court Cause No. 10 - 12513 - 2 Trial Court Cause No. 13 - 21227 - 2 Trial Court Cause No. 01 - 11212 - U

Trial Court Cause No. 12 - 275 - U 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang, and Brown Opinion by Justice O'Neill Relators filed this petition for writ of mandamus complaining of numerous actions of the trial court. The facts and issues are well

- known to the parties so we do not recount them here. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator s h ave not shown the y are entitled to the relief requested. See T EX . R. A PP . P.– 2

– 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

– 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator s ’ petition for writ of mandamus.

141157F.P05 /Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUST ICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6287

JEFFREY WHITEHEAD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LINDA SKINNER, Unit Manager, Hoke Correctional

Center; DOCTOR DAVENPORT; W. SHIELDS, Superintendant, Hoke Correctional Center; JOEL HERON,

Unit Manager, Hoke Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-95-556-3)

Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 10, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Whitehead, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ray Garvey, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Whitehead v. Skinner, No.

CA-95-556-3 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2015 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

7-13-2015

Karen Barkes v. First Corr Med Inc

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015

This July is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University

School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2015 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of

Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Karen Barkes v. First Corr Med Inc" (2015). 2015 Decisions. Paper 716.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015/716
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

______

No. 12-3074

______

KAREN BARKES, as administratrix

of the Estate of Christopher Barkes;

ALEXANDRA BARKES; BRITTANY BARKES

v.

FIRST CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL, INC.;

STANLEY TAYLOR; RAPHAEL WILLIAMS;

CERTAIN UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES

OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

CERTAIN UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES

OF FIRST CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL, INC.

STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Stanley Taylor and Raphael Williams,

Appellants

______

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Delaware

(D. DE. No. 1-06-cv-00104)

District Judge: Honorable Leonard P. Stark

______

Originally Argued September 24, 2013

Remanded by the Supreme Court of the United States 

on July 6, 2015

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)

on July 6, 2015
2

Before: AMBRO, FISHER and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges.

______

JUDGMENT ORDER

______

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court 

for the District of Delaware and was argued on September 24, 2013.

By opinion and judgment dated June 1, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United 

States REVERSED the decision of the Third Circuit, it is now hereby ORDERED and 

ADJUDGED that the case is REMANDED to the District Court to dismiss the complaint 

consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court. 

By the Court,

s/ D. Michael Fisher 

Circuit Judge

Attest:

s/Marcia M. Waldron

Clerk

Dated: July 13, 2015