28704 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 17, 2009 / Notices 

(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise 

noted, nonbanking activities will be 

conducted throughout the United States. 

Additional information on all bank 

holding companies may be obtained 

from the National Information Center 

website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/. 

Unless otherwise noted, comments 

regarding each of these applications 

must be received at the Reserve Bank 

indicated or the offices of the Board of 

Governors not later than July 10, 2009. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 

(Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice 

President) 230 South LaSalle Street, 

Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414: 

1. Van Financial Corp., Breda, Iowa; 

to become a bank holding company by 

acquiring at least 80 percent of Breda 

Savings Bank, Breda, Iowa. 

B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 

(Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs 

Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, 

Missouri 63166-2034: 

1. BCC Bancshares, Inc., Hardin, 

Illinois; to become a bank holding 

company by acquiring 100 percent of 

Bank of Calhoun County, Hardin, 

Illinois. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, June 12, 2009. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Deputy Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. E9–14202 Filed 6–16–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–S 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention 

[60Day–09–0604] 

Proposed Data Collections Submitted 

for Public Comment and 

Recommendations 

In compliance with the requirement 

of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for 

opportunity for public comment on 

proposed data collection projects, the 

Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic 

summaries of proposed projects. To 

request more information on the 

proposed projects or to obtain a copy of 

the data collection plans and 

instruments, call 404–639–5960 and 

send comments to Maryam I. Daneshvar, 

CDC Acting Reports Clearance Officer, 

1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta, 

GA 30333 or send an e-mail to 

omb@cdc.gov. 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. Written comments should 

be received within 60 days of this 

notice. 

Proposed Project 

School Associated Violent Death 

Surveillance System (0920–0604)— 

Reinstatement—National Center for 

Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), 

Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention (CDC). 

Background and Brief Description 

The Division of Violence Prevention 

(DVP), National Center for Injury 

Prevention and Control (NCIPC) 

proposes to maintain a system for the 

surveillance of school-associated 

homicides and suicides. The system 

will rely on existing public records and 

interviews with law enforcement 

officials and school officials. The 

purpose of the system is to (1) estimate 

the rate of school-associated violent 

death in the United States and (2) 

identify common features of schoolassociated violent deaths. The system 

will contribute to the understanding of 

fatal violence associated with schools, 

guide further research in the area, and 

help direct ongoing and future 

prevention programs. 

Violence is the leading cause of death 

among young people, and increasingly 

recognized as an important public 

health and social issue. In 2006, over 

3,200 school aged children (5 to 18 

years old) in the United States died 

violent deaths due to suicide, homicide, 

and unintentional firearm injuries. The 

vast majority of these fatal injuries were 

not school associated. However, 

whenever a homicide or suicide occurs 

in or around school, it becomes a matter 

of particularly intense public interest 

and concern. NCIPC conducted the first 

scientific study of school-associated 

violent deaths during the 1992–99 

academic years to establish the true 

extent of this highly visible problem. 

Despite the important role of schools as 

a setting for violence research and 

prevention interventions, relatively 

little scientific or systematic work has 

been done to describe the nature and 

level of fatal violence associated with 

schools. Until NCIPC conducted the first 

nationwide investigation of violent 

deaths associated with schools, public 

health and education officials had to 

rely on limited local studies and 

estimated numbers to describe the 

extent of school-associated violent 

death. 

The system will draw cases from the 

entire United States in attempting to 

capture all cases of school-associated 

violent deaths that have occurred. 

Investigators will review public records 

and published press reports concerning 

each school-associated violent death. 

For each identified case, investigators 

will also interview an investigating law 

enforcement official (defined as a police 

officer, police chief, or district attorney), 

and a school official (defined as a school 

principal, school superintendent, school 

counselor, school teacher, or school 

support staff) who are knowledgeable 

about the case in question. Researchers 

will request information on both the 

victim and alleged offender(s)— 

including demographic data, their 

academic and criminal records, and 

their relationship to one another. They 

will also collect data on the time and 

location of the death; the circumstances, 

motive, and method of the fatal injury; 

and the security and violence 

prevention activities in the school and 

community where the death occurred, 

before and after the fatal injury event. 

There are no costs to the respondents 

other than their time. 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 17, 2009 / Notices 28705 

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS

Respondents Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Average 

burden per 

response 

(in hours) 

Total burden 

(in hours) 

School Officials ................................................................................................ 35 1 60/60 35 

Police Officials ................................................................................................. 35 1 60/60 35 

Total .......................................................................................................... ........................ ........................ 70 ........................

Dated: June 11, 2009. 

Maryam I. Daneshvar, 

Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. E9–14224 Filed 6–16–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request 

Periodically, the Substance Abuse and 

Mental Health Services Administration 

(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of 

information collection requests under 

OMB review, in compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35). To request a copy of these 

documents, call the SAMHSA Reports 

Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243. 

Project: Garrett Lee Smith Campus Case 

Studies Funded Through the Garrett 

Lee Smith Memorial Suicide Prevention 

and Early Intervention Programs—New 

The Substance Abuse and Mental 

Health Services Administration’s 

(SAMHSA), Center for Mental Health 

Services (CMHS) is conducting up to six 

campus case studies with Garrett Lee 

Smith Memorial (GLS) Suicide 

Prevention and Early Intervention 

Campus Program grantees. The GLS 

Campus Case Studies (CCS) build upon 

campuses’ existing local evaluation 

being implemented and funded through 

the GLS grant program. The goal of the 

CCS is to understand how a public 

health approach is successfully applied 

as a model for campus suicide 

prevention efforts, and will explore, in 

a systematic manner: The suicide 

prevention related infrastructures and 

supports (e.g., clinical and non-clinical) 

that exist on up to six selected GLSfunded campuses; the various studentlevel factors that are related to suicide 

prevention efforts (e.g., protective 

factors, coping strategies, social norms, 

and facilitators and barriers to student 

access and receipt of behavioral 

healthcare); campus interdepartmental 

collaboration and the relationship 

between various efforts to promote 

student mental health and wellness; and 

the extent to which the campus 

infrastructures and supports promote 

and address these factors. 

The data collected through this 

project will contribute to the knowledge 

base regarding a successful model for 

suicide prevention that integrates 

multiple prevention programs targeting 

risk and protective behaviors which 

place students at risk for a host of 

negative mental and physical health 

outcomes correlated with suicide, 

including violence, stress, untreated 

depression and mental illness, and 

academic failure. The strategies 

targeting various populations on 

campus will also be discussed, as well 

as the campus policies and procedures 

which facilitate campus efforts related 

to mental health promotion and crisis 

response. The CCS design includes 

three data collection strategies: (1) Case 

study key informant interviews (CSIs); 

(2) focus groups with students, faculty, 

and staff; and (3) an Enhanced Module 

to the OMB-approved Suicide 

Prevention Exposure, Awareness and 

Knowledge Survey—Student Version 

(OMB No. 0930–0286) administered to a 

sample of students. Data collection is 

planned to commence in fall 2008. CCS 

activities will be implemented on up to 

six GLS-funded campuses. 

The following describes the specific 

data collection activities and the data 

collection instruments to be used, 

followed by a summary table of the 

number of respondents and the 

respondent burden: 

• Enhanced Module for the SPEAKS. 

The Enhanced Module will be added to 

the OMB-approved Suicide Prevention 

Exposure, Awareness, and Knowledge 

Survey (SPEAKS)—Student Version 

(OMB No. 0930–0286). The Enhanced 

Module examines coping strategies, 

help-seeking behaviors, awareness of 

available mental health services, and 

risk and protective factors across the 

student population. Questions include 

the availability of resources to provide 

assistance to those at risk for suicide; 

the types of coping strategies they use 

when experiencing stress; from whom, 

if anyone, they would seek help; if they 

have dealt with mental health issues, 

sought help, and experienced trauma; 

and their use of protective factors. The 

Enhanced Module is Web-based and 

includes multiple-choice, Likert-scale, 

and yes/no questions. The Enhanced 

Module includes 16 items and will take 

approximately 10 minutes to complete. 

The Enhanced Module will be 

administered at each campus once in 

conjunction with the SPEAKS—Student 

Version to a random sample of 200 

students. 

• Student Focus Group Moderator’s 

Guide. This component will assess 

student risk and protective factors 

related to mental health, help-seeking 

behaviors, and knowledge of prevention 

activities on campus and their perceived 

effectiveness. This will help researchers 

more fully understand student-level 

factors in relation to population-level 

factors addressed by the Enhanced 

Module for the SPEAKS. Questions 

address stressors that different groups of 

students face while in college, barriers 

to seeking help, attitudes and stigma 

related to seeking help, and the 

accessibility of the campus counseling 

center. Six of the following seven 

groups of students will participate in 

focus groups on each campus, as 

decided by the campus: (1) First-year 

students, (2) athletes, (3) international 

students, (4) Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and 

Transgender (LGBT) students, (5) Greek 

life students, (6) graduate students, and 

(7) residential advisors/peer educators. 

Recruitment will be conducted by 

campus project staff. Focus groups will 

include a maximum of 9 students. Thus, 

the total number of student focus group 

participants will not exceed 324. Groups 

will last approximately 90 minutes. 

• Faculty/Staff Focus Group 

Moderator’s Guide. The faculty and staff 

focus groups will assess the campus’ 

approach to prevention, attitudes and 

stigma around student mental health 

and wellness on campus, campus 

infrastructure supports for students who 

need mental health help, and the 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES