alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 9, 2015

No. 04-14-00078-CV

RIVER CITY CARE CENTER, INC. d/b/a River City Care Center,

Appellants

v.

Betty TAYLOR,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-15814

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice 

 Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice 

 Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000012473
<NAME> BLACKSTONE VALLEY ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        85650
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        196
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           19132
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         29167
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  134145
<COMMON>                                          9203
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        17908
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              14547
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   41658
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       6130
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             32000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                     1500
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   52857
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   134145
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       130202
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                              3245
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      118197
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      121442
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                           8760
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (71)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                    8689
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          3784
<NET-INCOME>                                      4905
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        289
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                     4616
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          1049
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                         3030
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            9997
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32A

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending November 25, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I
Robert H. Spilman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert H. Spilman, Jr.           
|Robert H. Spilman, Jr.               
|President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bassett Furniture
Industries, Incorporated and will be retained by Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nicholas Sanchez, Appellant.

Submitted July 2, 2012;

decided August 28, 2012

*987Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 11 Park Place, Suite 1601, New York, NY 10007 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 15

- 12 271 Non

- Argument Calendar

______________ __________ D.C. Docket No. 2:13

- cv
- 14 4 53

- JEM

OSCAR RODRIGUEZ , LIZABETH RODRIGUEZ , Plaintiff s
- Appell ants ,

versus DETECTIVE MARK SH I REMAN , in his individual and official capacity,
Defendant

- Appellee

.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ (March 28, 2016) Before WILSON, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES , Circuit Judges.
PER CUR IAM:

Case: 15-12271 Date Filed: 03/28/2016 Page: 1 of 22 Detective Mark Shireman arrested Oscar and Liz a beth Rodriguez on charges of dealing in stolen property , in violation of Florida Statutes § 812.019

. However , the state attorney ultimately dropped the charges

. Thereafter , t he Rodriguezes filed

a complaint in district court raising 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state malicious prosecution claims against Shireman. The Rodriguezes asserted that Shireman violated their Fourth Amendment rights and engaged in malicious prosecution
because he arrested them witho ut probable cause. The district court granted summary judgment to Shireman on all of the Rod riguezes’ claims . This appeal
followed. After careful consideration of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm substantially for reasons given by the opinion of the district court. See Rodriguez
v. Shireman , No. 2: 13

- cv
- 14453

- JEM (S.D. Fla. May 13, 2015).
AFFIRMED. Case: 15-12271 Date Filed: 03/28/2016 Page: 2 of 2
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXA

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

7/10/2015 \A COA Case No. 

WILEY, CHRISTOPHER Tr. Ct. No. 241-1239-13 

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant's Pro Se motion 

of time in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. Th

petition has been extended to Tuesday, September 15, 2015. 

EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition F

Review must be filed with The Court of Criminal Appeals.

A

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
#### Hamlet at Willow Creek Development Co., LLC, et al., Respondents, v Northeast Land Development Corporation, Respondent, and Pav-Co Asphalt, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Submitted February 19, 2013;

decided April 2, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made by William Fehr, dismissed upon the ground that he is not a party aggrieved; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden 
(Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer 
Burden (Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer 
service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, February 19, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7979.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden 
(Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Thursday, February 19, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time. For more 
information, please contact Ms. Sallie Chavez. Please call Ms. Chavez 
at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write Sallie Chavez, TAP Office, 
1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post 
comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: December 22, 2008.
Roy L. Block,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E9-147 Filed 1-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
***NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION***

***MICS CLASS II - AUDIT CHECKLIST***

***PULL TABS (PT)***

Page 2 of 4
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 199 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 199

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, 
         and Technology in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2019

  Ms. Johnson of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, 
         and Technology in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $11,533,400 for the One 
Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,766,700 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2019, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2020; and
            (2) not more than $5,766,700 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2020, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2021.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
#### Brenda Cornell, Respondent, v 360 West 51st Street Realty, LLC, et al., Defendants, and 360 W. 51st Street Corp., Appellant.

Submitted November 5, 2012;

decided December 11, 2012

Motion to dismiss appeal denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of M.M-Y.P., a Child

S.L.R. v. Department of Family and Protective Services

Appellate case number: 01-15-00258-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-00702J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

Appellant filed an original brief on May 18, 2015. Appellee filed a responsive brief on 

June 8, 2015. Appellant has not filed a reply. 

Appellant is requested to file a reply brief to address Appellee’s argument that “Mother’s 

Motion for New Trial” should be treated as a judicial admission regarding Appellant’s interest in 

terminating her parental rights.

Appellant’s reply brief, if she chooses to file one, is due no later than Friday, July 17, 

2015.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 9, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             BKF CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of BKF Capital Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Glenn A. Aigen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (including subsections (a) (b) and (c)
thereof), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          (3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                        /s/ Glenn A. Aigen
                                                       -----------------------
                                                          Glenn A. Aigen
                                                       Chief Financial Officer

May 11, 2005
# Types of NINDS Small Business Grants 

The NINDS Small Business Program has two main component programs: the **Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program** and the **Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Program.**Applicant success rates of both the SBIR and STTR programs depend on the budget and the number of applications and can fluctuate from year to year. While the STTR budget is significantly smaller, historically the program gets far fewer applications. 

> -  Potential applicants should **send a brief abstract or overview of their technology at least one month before** the SBIR/STTR standard deadline. 
-  Contact Small Business Program staff at: NINDS_SBIR@ninds.nih.gov 
- Further questions? Visit our list of  NINDS Small Business FAQS .

## 

## 

## 

> NINDS Small Business Program Contact Information
Sign up for the Division of Translational Research Listserv to stay up to date with the latest news and funding opportunities!
Emily Caporello, Ph.D.Directoremily.caporello@nih.govTaryn Aubrecht, Ph.D.Program Director, Clinical and Research Toolstaryn.aubrecht@nih.govAnnette Gilchrist, Ph.D.Program Director, Drug Developmentannette.gilchrist@nih.govJessica Forbes, Ph.D.Health Program Specialistjessica.forbes@nih.govSara Sameni, Ph.D.Health Program Specialistsara.sameni@nih.govSara Dauber, MBAStrategic Consultantsara.dauber@nih.gov
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 204 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2019 

Mr. TAKANO (for himself and Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Veterans’ Af4 fairs (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $11,084,062 for the One Hundred Six9 teenth Congress. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 204 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $5,542,031 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2019, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2020; and 

7 (2) not more than $5,542,031 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2020, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2021. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sharon Mabry, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 722]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 13, 2001 *(People v Mabry,*288 AD2d 326 [2001]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 17, 2000, and an amended sentence of the same court imposed March 24, 2000.

Ordered that the application is denied.

*1024The appellant has failed to establish that she was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Florio, Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# mniteb**~tates** 

# ([ourt of §ppeaIs for tlJejf 

# eberaI ([ircuit
JOSE A. CADIENTE, Petitioner, 

### v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. • 2011-3146 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. SF0831100627-I-1. 

### ON MOTION

ORDER Upon consideration of Jose A. Cadiente's motion to voluntarily withdraw his appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.CADIENTE v. OPM 

## J\D.. 

## 19 2011 Date
cc: Jose A. 

### Cadiente Sarah M. Bienkowski, Esq. 

### s21 FOR THE COURT lsI 

### Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2



### IssuedAs A Mandate: 

## J\D.. 1

## 92011

U.S.

## couJ~~~~PEALS FOR THE fEDERAL CIRCUIT 

## JUb 1 92011

JAN HOR8AlY 

### CLERK
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>     5

<MULTIPLIER>  1


<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                 APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                                           201,850
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 201,887
<PP&E>                                                            13,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    13,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   201,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             27,411
<BONDS>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                           1,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                         2,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     201,987
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   6,432
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  23,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (17,011)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (17,011)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0



</TABLE>
Dismissed and Opinion Filed April 8, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00040

- CV

JASON PARKS , Appellant

V.

GEICO CASUALTY COMPA NY , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006

- 00926

- 2020

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Smith Opinion by Justice Molberg

Appellant ’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated M arch 11 , 2021,

we notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant

to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that

failure to file his brief by that time might result in the dismissa l of this appeal without

further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, nor

otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.– 2

–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a )(1); 42.3(b),

(c).

210040f.p05 /Ken Molberg/

KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JASON PARKS, Appellant

No. 05

- 21

- 00040

- CV V.

GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006

- 00926

- 2020. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg. Justices Goldstein and Smith participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that appellee GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY recover its costs of this appeal from appellant JASON PARKS.

Judgment entered this 8 th day of April, 2021.