alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3473 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3473

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to authorize advances from Oil 
    Spill Liability Trust Fund for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADVANCES FROM OIL SPILL LIABILITY TRUST FUND FOR DEEPWATER 
              HORIZON OIL SPILL.

    Section 6002(b) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2752) 
is amended in the second sentence--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``Coast Guard''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``and (2) in the case of the discharge of oil that 
        began in 2010 in connection with the explosion on, and sinking 
        of, the mobile offshore drilling unit Deepwater Horizon, may, 
        without further appropriation, obtain 1 or more advances from 
        the Fund as needed, up to a maximum of $100,000,000 for each 
        advance, with the total amount of all advances not to exceed 
        the amounts available under section 9509(c)(2) of the Internal 
        Revenue Code of 1986, and within 7 days of each advance, shall 
        notify Congress of the amount advanced and the facts and 
        circumstances necessitating the advance''.

SEC. 2. BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go-Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the Senate June 9, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3473

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to authorize advances from Oil 
    Spill Liability Trust Fund for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
```
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-B  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 14th day of November, 2005.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-B
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited Partnership  II-B and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-B and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
m-3 m 

Governor James Lee Edwards 

Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 

2025 South Gordon Cooper . 

Shawnee, OK 74801 

Subject: Amendment to Tribal Gaming Ordinance 

Dear Governor Edwards: 

The Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) first approved the 

Absentee Shawnee Tribe's mbe) Gaming Code on January 10,1995, and approved an 

amendment to the Gaming Code on hlarch 27,2000. This letter responds the request of 

the Tribe's Attorney General that the NlGC review and approve another amendment to 

the Tribe's Gaming Code. 

In a letter dated July 15,2003, Merrilyn B. Livermon submitted the amendment, adopted 

by Resolution No. LrAS-2003-42. The amendment to the Tribe's gaming ordinance 

concerns the licensing of vendors. 

This letter constitutes approval of the amendment to the Tribe's gaming ordinance. 

sente&hawnee Tribe of Oklahoma's amendment for 

or require Mer assistance, please contact Sandra J. 

cc: Memilyn B. Livemon, Attorney General 

Tim E. Harper, NiGC Regional Director, Tulsa, with enclosure 

NATIONAL HEAUQUA~RS 1441 L Sf. NW. Suite 9100, Washington. DC 20W5 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 www.nlac.wV 

RECiONAL OFFICES Portland. OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix. AZ St. Paul, MN;Tulsa. OK
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000824840
<NAME> ADVANTAGE LIFE PRODUCTS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,540,826
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       125,745
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,666,571)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of ASI Technology Corporation (the "Company"), in his
capacity and as of the date set forth below, does hereby certify with respect to
the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"10-KSB Report") that to his knowledge:

         (1) the 10-KSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  December 19, 2006

                              /s/ JERRY E. POLIS
                              ------------------
                              Jerry E. Polis, President and Principal Executive
                              Officer of ASI Technology Corporation


(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ASI Technology Corporation and will be retained by ASI Technology
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000850506
<NAME>                         GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-F
                                
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                              832,039
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       223,840
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,055,879
<PP&E>                           11,196,484
<DEPRECIATION>                    8,973,666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    3,335,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                49,807
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                        3,257,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      3,335,564
<SALES>                             820,953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  1,486,941
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       486,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   1,000,052
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               1,000,052
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                      1,000,052
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          5.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        
 

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about October 29, 2009 (the
“Report”), I, Robert H. Joseph, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Exchange Act; and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  October
      29, 2009
            /s/ Robert H. Joseph, Jr.Robert
      H. Joseph, Jr.Chief
      Financial OfficerAllianceBernstein
      Holding L.P.
EXHIBIT 32(b)



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of The Bank of New York Company, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 22, 2005



/s/ Bruce W. Van SaunName: Bruce W. Van SaunTitle: Chief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
*Monday, March 17, 1997*

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

97-32.

#### State ex rel. Gantz v. McGraw-Edison Co.

Franklin App. No. 96APD01-87. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due March 10,1997, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua sponte.*
#### In the Matter of Harry Josifidis, Appellant, v Richard F. Daines, as Commissioner of Health, et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 4, 2012;

decided August 30, 2012

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*19 NY3d 801 (2012)].
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 192 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Homeland Security 

in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi (for himself and Mr. ROGERS of Alabama) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Homeland Security in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Homeland Se4 curity (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $17,832,436 for the One Hundred 

9 Sixteenth Congress. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 192 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $8,718,127 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2019, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2020; and 

7 (2) not more than $9,114,309 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2020, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2021. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-05987, 333-59941,033-62887, 333-69306, 333-123232 on Forms S-8 of our report dated March 15, 2007, relating to theconsolidated financial statements of Michael Baker Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”)incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Michael Baker Corporation for theyear ended December 31, 2006, and of our reports on the Company’s financial statement schedule, andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPPittsburgh, Pennsylvania
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apogent Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank H. Jellinek, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ FRANK H. JELLINEK, JR.Frank H. Jellinek, Jr. Chief Executive Officer  August 13, 2003




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Apogent Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Apogent Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Willie JAMES, a/k/a Mutcey, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-4194.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 9, 2006.

Decided July 3, 2006.

Henry M. Anderson, Jr., Anderson Law Firm, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellant. Jonathan S. Gasser, United States Attorney, Alfred W. Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*410Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Willie James pled guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute and distribution of five grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000). The district court determined James was responsible for 2.5 kilograms of cocaine base, and sentenced him to 188 months’ imprisonment. We affirm James’s sentence.*

The sole issue James raises on appeal is the contention he should be resentenced in light of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because the district court based his offense level on a drug weight that was neither admitted by him nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. As James raises this issue for the first time on appeal, review is for plain error. *See United States v. Evans,*416 F.3d 298, 300 (4th Cir.2005). To establish that a Sixth Amendment error occurred during sentencing, a defendant must show that the district court imposed a sentence exceeding the maximum allowed based only on the facts to which he admitted. *Id.*“Admissions may take a variety of forms, including guilty pleas and stipulations, a defendant’s own statements in open court, and representations by counsel.” *United States v. Revels,*455 F.3d 448 (4th Cir. 2006) (internal citations omitted).

At sentencing, counsel represented that James “did not disagree with the total weight which was computed in the presentence report,” but rather that James disagreed with the specific dates on which drug transactions occurred. Any issues involving specific dates were resolved, and counsel withdrew his objections to the presentence report. Consequently, James was assigned an offense level based on the drug weight specified in the presentence report. Like the representation made in *Jones,*counsel’s assertion that James did not disagree with the total weight computed served as the “functional equivalent” of adopting the factual basis for sentencing. *See Jones,*181 Fed.Appx. 337; *see also Revels,*455 F.3d at 449. Therefore, we conclude judicial factfinding was not required and there was no Sixth Amendment error.

Accordingly, we affirm James’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 This appeal was placed in abeyance pending the issuance of *United States v. Jones,*181 Fed.Appx. 337 (4th Cir.2006) (unpublished).
# Messages about Men’s Mental Health

Follow the NIMH Director on **

Coping With Coronavirus: Managing Stress, Fear, and Anxiety
                                                                      By Joshua Gordon on                March 16, 2020

Each person responds to stress in different ways. In this Director’s message, Dr. Gordon talks about managing fear, anxiety, and stress related to the coronavirus pandemic.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

OF FLORIDA 

SECOND DISTRICT 

LETITIA NANETTE LOLLIS, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D14-834 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed July 10, 2015. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Lisa Campbell, Judge. 

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, 

Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

VILLANTI, Chief Judge. 

 Letitia Nanette Lollis appeals her convictions for aggravated battery with a 

deadly weapon, tampering with a witness, petit theft, uttering a forged instrument, and 

fraudulent use of personal information. We affirm her convictions without further 
- 2 -

discussion. However, Lollis argues and the State properly concedes that we must 

reverse her sentences for the uttering and fraudulent use charges because the trial 

court's oral pronouncement of sentence differs from the written sentencing documents. 

Specifically, the written sentencing documents do not include the qualifying conditions 

orally announced by the court that Lollis's prison sentences are to be suspended after 

three years in favor of two years' probation on the uttering and fraudulent use charges. 

A trial court's written sentence must conform to its oral pronouncement; when the two 

differ, that constitutes reversible error. See Rivera v. State, 34 So. 3d 207, 208 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 2010). Accordingly, we reverse this portion of Lollis's sentence and remand for the 

trial court to enter an amended sentence consistent with its oral pronouncement. 

 Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. 

KELLY and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.