alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Hammerschlag Manuf’g Co. *v.*Spalding *et al.*

*(Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts.*

November 17, 1886.)

Patents for Inventions—Infringement—Waxed Paper.

In view of the broad construction given to the fifth claim of reissued letters patent No. 8,460, of October 22, 1878, to Siegfried Hammerschlag, for a process of mating waxed paper by machinery, in *Hammerschlag*v. *Wood,*18 Ped. Rep. 175, and other similar decisions, *held,*that the “Spaulding Machine” was an infringement, and that a preliminary injunction should issue.

In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.

The bill was filed to enjoin an alleged infringement of reissued letters patent No. 8,460, of October 22, 1878, (original No. 193,867, of August 7,1877,) to Siegfried Hammerschlag, for a process of making waxed paper by machinery. The fifth claim of the reissue is as follows:

“The method herein set forth of waxing paper, consisting in spreading the wax upon the surface, heating the paper from the opposite side to spread and fuse the wax into the fabric of the paper, removing the surplus wax, and remelting and polishing the wax upon the paper, substantially as set forth. ”

*Frost & Coe*and *Livermore & Fish,*for complainants.

*H. D. Hadlock, Thomas Weston, Jr.,*and *Lorenzo Dow,*for defendant.

Colt, J.

In view of the broad construction given to the fifth claim of the Hammerschlag patent by various courts, and especially in view of *67the decision of Judge Lowell in the *Wood Case,*18 Fed. Rep. 175. Iain clearly of opinion that the complainant is entitled to a preliminary injunction. The Spaulding machine manifestly comes within the scope of these decisions. Differences of such a class as exist between the Spaulding and Hammerschlag machines have been held not to relieve a party from the charge of infringement. Injunction granted.

1

The opinion in this case reached us but recently. It is now published in connection with the opinion on final hearing, reported *infra.*
#### UNITED STATES v. STARKS.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Aug. 20, 1946.

Nathan April, of New York City, for defendant, for the motion.

John F. X. McGohey, U. S. Atty., and Joseph P. Giaimo, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of New York City, opposed.

HOLTZOFF,

Justice, District Court of U. S. for District of Columbia, sitting by designation.

Assuming that at common law an indictment for forgery had to set out in haec verba the document charged to have been forged,* it is the view of this Court that this requirement no longer prevails under the new Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rule 7(c) provides that the indictment or the information shall be a plain, concise and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged. The rule also contains the following provision:

> “It”—meaning the indictment—“need not contain a formal commencement, a formal conclusion or any other matter not necessary to such statement.”

 It is the view of this Court that this indictment complies with the requirement that it must be a plain, concise and definite written statement of the facts constituting the offense charged. There are two tests that an indictment must meet: First, it must apprise the defendant of the specific offense with which he is charged. This indictment clearly meets that test. The second test is that the indictment must be sufficiently definite in order that if the defendant is later charged with the same offense he will be in a position to interpose a plea of double jeopardy. The Court feels that this indictment also complies with this test.

It is no longer necessary to comply with any technical requirements with which the common law was replete in respect to the contents of an indictment. It must be borne in mind that these archaic standards of the common law originated in an era when practically every felony was punishable by death and the courts devised them as a means of avoiding the necessity of imposing death sentences. These technicalities h'ave long been outmoded. They are no longer the law in the Federal courts. The Court will deny the motion.

*

 See United States v. Heinze, C.C., 161 P. 425, 428, and United States v. French, C.C., 57 F. 382, 888.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 16 

Recognizing the importance of access to comprehensive, high-quality, lifeaffirming medical care for women of all ages. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mrs. LESKO, and Mr. GAETZ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of access to comprehensive, highquality, life-affirming medical care for women of all ages. 

Whereas women of all ages should have access to comprehensive, convenient, compassionate, life-affirming, high-quality medical services; 

Whereas all women should feel empowered and equipped with 

the knowledge to listen to their body and advocate for 

their health; 

Whereas health care for women should emphasize the whole 

woman, including her physical, mental, and spiritual 

wellness; 

Whereas health care for women should also address the needs 

of men, families, and communities as they relate to women’s health care; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 16 IH 

Whereas health care centers should include access to social 

services that empower women to care for their health; 

Whereas Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers is a consortium of 

centers that serves as an example of the high-quality, 

comprehensive, life-affirming care that women deserve; 

Whereas every Pro Women’s Healthcare Center-certified clinic has a licensed medical professional; 

Whereas every Pro Women’s Healthcare Center offers comprehensive health services, including well-woman exams, 

sexually transmitted disease testing and treatment, 

breast exams, pregnancy testing, prenatal and pregnancy 

care, miscarriage support, fertility awareness instruction, 

infertility consultation, and onsite or nearby, direct referrals for material, emotional, practical, and spiritual resources; and 

Whereas Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers has certified 

health care centers nationwide that meet its standards 

for high-quality, life-affirming care and continue to do so: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses its support for women nationwide 

3 to have access to comprehensive, convenient, com4 passionate, life-affirming, high-quality health care; 

5 and 

6 (2) recognizes the high standards established by 

7 Pro Women’s Healthcare Centers consortium as 

8 standards worth implementing nationwide. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
;//£/ dLJs~, ~/c;r/ c k~ /0/ 77£ ~/:J£1~1 

-dsd-u· 7Y7 7 g 7; I 

:2- ~d/aV /' --r-~/' //~cff'~ 

9'3 J' /5/J /&, ;Ty 

~i/(j/d-t' ·Y ?'Ys-~7 

c£f ~ ·al&/5 

IJ~, <?lfl·03 

JUL 1"' ,. ' . d '-• . J 

z /fJ£GIIAJ. ~.i~~r:\ 

~/~.,- <Ll£/1/ c k.r: . / ..:::;£;;/ hi# ~£yd LS~~J //A// Ld't/J5 ,t/l/&W 

iJ/ ddd /?, .J~/S ~ k/~J ~)7 cYA£:'l' ~~ L--14-

~//lff/ A/,-;J£:/1:4.</ /£/? yJV:e/R/~£~ /LJ/f/'#'5 ~// . 

//..£J7 rrd5 ~d/dl •'/£//15 fla~s b/ 11/lfJc:/Jrj hilc6kL- ~.J./. 

{_1~; ~y£_rd# o / p<-H £-rf 76. /;Ykfk kAP me:_ 

/k L'jk~L/ £) / /k £.&d6- 7.s.l /14./ /b //5 \ 

c£r£;/_ ~ // ~.5 ~ad~/ ~~Lb m£ /a/ b ./ ~tf£dJ c"""'?us. 

c .. e.
EXHIBIT 10.1


FORM OF


FIRST AMENDMENT TO UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE





THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE originally dated November 9, 2009, is made as of April 30, 2010, by and between the Borrower, Brekford International Corp., a  Delaware corporation (“Borrower”) and __________________, an individual person (the “Lender”),.whose principal business address is located at 7020 Dorsey Road, Suite C, Hanover, Maryland 21076 (Lender and all other or subsequent holders of this promissory note, referred to as a “Holder”)(the “Amendment”)





WHEREAS, the Borrower delivered to Lender a Promissory Note, dated November 9, 2009, in the original principal amount of $___________, a copy of which is attached hereto as Annex A and made a part hereof by reference, (collectively, the “Promissory Note”);





WHEREAS, the parties to this Amendment desire to amend the conversion terms and the maturity date of the Promissory Note consistent with the terms and conditions set forth herein;





NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties intending to be legally bound hereby agree as follows:




1.           Incorporation of Recitals.  The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.




Terms




Payment Terms Maturity Date




4.           Amended Conversion Rights.  The Holder’s conversion rights shall be amended to reflect that the Holder, at his option, so long as any portion of this Note remains outstanding, may elect to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal portion of this Note, and any accrued and unpaid interest (the date of delivery of a completed Notice of Conversion in the form annexed to the Promissory Note to the Borrower’s Vice President of Finance being a “Conversion Date”) into shares (“Shares”) of the Borrower’s common stock, par value $.0001 per share (“Common Stock”), at a price of fourteen cents ($0.14) per Share (the “Conversion Price”), subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3(b) in the Promissory Note.







5.           Conflict between the Promissory Note and this Amendment.  In the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of the Promissory Note and the terms and provisions of this Amendment, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall govern.






6.           Ratification of Promissory Note. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Promissory Note remains in full force and effect.




7.           Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all constituting only one agreement.  All executed facsimile copies of this Amendment shall have the same force and effect as an executed original.







[Signature Page Follows]


2


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed and delivered by the Borrower as of the dateand year first above written.




Brekford International Corp.By:Name:
Tin KhinTitle:
Vice President of Finance














Accepted and Agreed:By:Name:





3


Annex A





Promissory Note
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and the Statement
of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          300,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,287,718
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,278
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,278)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
FCFS 06.30.2013 Exhibit 10.2




EXHIBIT 10.2


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED 
EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF RICK L. WESSEL




This is the Second Amendment (“Second Amendment”) to the First Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement of Rick L. Wessel originally entered into as of October 16, 2007, as amended with Amendment No. 1 dated January 1, 2010, (the "Agreement"), by and between First Cash Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, and Rick L. Wessel (the "Executive").  This Second Amendment shall apply prospectively and is effective as of July 23, 2013.      


WHEREAS, Executive is presently serving the Company as an employee pursuant to the Agreement between the parties (said Agreement including all previous amendments and/or addenda, if any), and the parties desire to modify the Agreement as set forth below.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and obligations hereinafter set forth, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


		
	1.
	In paragraph 4 of the Agreement, replace the term “December 31, 2015” with “December 31, 2018.”




		
	2.
	In paragraph 7(a) of the Agreement, replace the content of section (iii) with the following:  “(iii) be payable at the annual rate of $963,040 beginning January 1, 2013.”




		
	3.
	Except as modified herein, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.  




EXECUTIVE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE HAS BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS THIS FIRST AMENDMENT WITH HIS PRIVATE LEGAL COUNSEL AND HAS AVAILED HIMSELF OF THAT OPPORTUNITY.


	
				
	FIRST CASH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
	EXECUTIVE

	 
	 

	By:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Mikel D. Faulkner
	Rick L. Wessel

	 
	Chairman of the Compensation Committee
Exhibit 32B

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending November 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I Barry C. Safrit, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Barry C. Safrit                              
|Barry C. Safrit                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bassett Furniture
Industries, Incorporated and will be retained by Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3616 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3616

  To withdraw certain land in the State of New Mexico, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 20, 2010

 Mr. Bingaman (for himself and Mr. Udall of New Mexico) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To withdraw certain land in the State of New Mexico, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Law Enforcement Training 
Center Protection Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTER LAND.

    (a) In General.--For the purposes of protecting, operating, and 
maintaining the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Eddy County, 
New Mexico, and subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land 
described in subsection (b) is reserved for use by the Secretary of 
Homeland Security for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center and 
withdrawn from--
            (1) entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land 
        laws;
            (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and
            (3) operation of the mineral leasing, mineral materials, 
        and geothermal leasing laws.
    (b) Description of Land.--The Federal land referred to in 
subsection (a) is the approximately 2,700 acres of Federal land 
generally depicted as the ``Withdrawal Area'' on the map entitled 
``FLETC Land Withdrawal'' and dated May 4, 2010.
    (c) Withdrawal Period.--The withdrawal of the Federal land 
described in subsection (b) shall remain in effect for a period of 20 
years beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           1,885
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  283,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               285,235
<PP&E>                                      24,992,892
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,620,197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,657,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          678,519
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,730,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,657,930
<SALES>                                      1,230,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,254,817
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,828,918<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (783,607)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (783,607)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (783,607)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expense production taxes, and depreciation, depletion
and amortization expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-D ("Issuer") for the period
ending  March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 14th day of May, 2004.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-D
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-D and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-D and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John R. Judd, Chief Financial Officer of ATS Medical, Inc. (the "Company")
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,
2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 9, 2006


/s/ John R. Judd
-------------------------------------
Name: John R. Judd
Title: Chief Financial Officer