alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23A

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52405) pertaining to the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 1993 Long Term Incentive Plan,
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52407) pertaining to the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 1993 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors,
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-60327) pertaining to the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 1997 Employee Stock Plan, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-43188) pertaining to the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 2000 Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Bassett Furniture
Industries, Incorporated 1997 Employee Stock Plan, and the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 1993 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated February 12, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Bassett
Furniture Industries, Incorporated, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended November 29, 2008.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina

February 12, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3578 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3578

   To repeal the expansion of information reporting requirements for 
   payments of $600 or more to corporations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2010

   Mr. Johanns (for himself, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Thune, Mr. 
Vitter, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Risch, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Crapo, Ms. 
   Murkowski, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Enzi) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal the expansion of information reporting requirements for 
   payments of $600 or more to corporations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Paperwork Mandate 
Elimination Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXPANSION OF INFORMATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 9006 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and 
the amendments made thereby, are hereby repealed; and the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if such section, and 
amendments, had never been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Office of Refugee Resettlement; Single-Source Program Expansion 
Supplement to the Lutheran Social Services of South Dakota (LSS-SD) 
Under the South Dakota Wilson-Fish Program, Award

AGENCY: Office of Refugee Resettlement, ACF, HHS.

ACTION: Notice to award a single-Source program expansion supplement to 
the Lutheran Social Services of South Dakota (LSS-SD) under the South 
Dakota Wilson-Fish Program.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    CFDA Number: 93.583.
    Legislative Authority: The Refugee Act of 1980 as amended, Wilson-
Fish Amendment, 8 U.S.C. 1522(e)(7); section 412(e)(7)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.
    Amount of Award: $125,000.
    Project Period: 09/30/2007-09/29/2010
    Justification for the Exception to Competition: The Wilson-Fish 
program is an alternative to the traditional State-administered refugee 
assistance program for providing integrated assistance and services to 
refugees, asylees, Amerasian Immigrants, Cuban and Haitian Entrants, 
Trafficking Victims and Iraqi/Afghani SIV's. South Dakota is one of 12 
sites that has chosen this alternative approach.
    The supplemental funds will allow the grantee, LSS-SD, located in 
Sioux Falls, SD, to provide refugee cash assistance through the end of 
this fiscal year to eligible refugees (and others eligible for refugee 
benefits) under the South Dakota Wilson-Fish Program.
    The primary reason for the grantee's supplemental request is a 
higher number of arrivals than anticipated when the grantee's budget 
was submitted and approved last year. The Refugee Act of 1980 mandates 
that the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) reimburse States and 
Wilson-Fish projects for the costs of cash and medical assistance for 
newly arriving refugees. Since 1991, ORR has reimbursed States and 
Wilson-Fish agencies for providing cash and medical assistance to 
eligible individuals during their first eight months in the United 
States. Hence, the supplement is consistent with the purposes of the 
Wilson-Fish Program, the Refugee Act of 1980, and ORR policy.

Contact for Further Information: Carl Rubenstein, Wilson-Fish Program 
Manager, Office of Refugee Resettlement, Aerospace Building, 8th Floor 
West, 901 D Street, SW., Washington, DC 20447. Telephone: 202-205-5933, 
E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4122333423242f323524282f012022276f2929326f262e37"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7310010611161d0007161a1d331210155d1b1b005d141c05">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: 06/04/2009.
David H. Siegel,
Acting Director, Office of Refugee Resettlement.
[FR Doc. E9-14140 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### PIKE v. SPARTANBURG RAILWAY, GAS AND ELECTRIC CO.

1. Amendment of Pleadings. — Order requiring plaintiff to amend her amended complaint so as to conform to order requiring more specific allegations, proper here.

2. Discretion. — Extension of Time to Answer is within discretion of Circuit Judge, and here properly exercised.

Before Watts, J., Spartanburg, June, 1903.

Affirmed.

Action by Minnie H. Pike, admx., against Spartanburg Railway, Gas and Electric Co. From order requiring plaintiff to further amend complaint, she appeals.

*Messrs. Joseph L.*Stoppelbein, and *Fvans &*Finley, for appellant,

cite: *Not necessary to allege that defendants knew of defects in machinery:*35 S. C., 407; 18 S. C., 363, 375; 33 S. C., 301. *Master is charged with knowledge of defects:*34 S. C., 314; 18 S. C., 363; 33 S. C., 93. *Not necessary to allege date when and person who called attention of master to defects:*34 S. C., 316; 18 S. C., 381; 35 S. C., 407.

*Mr. C. P.*Sanders, contra,

cites: *Plaintiff’s appeal is premature:*Code, 11; 43 S. C., 547; 53 S. C., 587.

March 25, 1903.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is an appeal by- plaintiff from an order of Judge Watts, requiring plaintiff to make her complaint definite and certain, in accordance with the previous order of Judge Townsend. The defendant also appealed, but at the hearing abandoned the same. In the effort to comply with the order of Judge Townsend, plaintiff prepared and served an amended complaint. On defendant’s motion to require plaintiff to further amend her complaint in conformity with Judge Townsend’s order, Judge Watts held that the amended complaint conformed to Judge *410Townsend’s order in every particular save one, which he specified, and ordered plaintiff to comply therein, and further allowed defendant twenty days in which to answer after service of the complaint, amended as directed. Plaintiff’s exceptions complaint of the order in both particulars.

1 We see no error. There was no appeal from the order of Judge Townsend, and whether right or wrong, it was the law in the case. Judge Watts could not and did not undertake to review or overrule the order of Judge Townsend, but merely undertook to require compliance therewith, and in this he was right.

*2*
      **The extension of the time in which to answer was within his discretion, and entirely proper under the circumstances.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE VICE PRESIDENT

           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350



     Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the
undersigned Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Badger Paper Mills,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




/s/ William H. Peter
----------------------------------
William H. Peters
March 3, 2003

                                      -49-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s 1997 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            4402
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2075
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                         70
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6952
<PP&E>                                           58191
<DEPRECIATION>                                   33084
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   34398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5347
<BONDS>                                          11100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           821
<OTHER-SE>                                       11329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     34398
<SALES>                                          13680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14830
<CGS>                                             5176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3044
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2778
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1728
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1050
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1050
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamie HERNANDEZ-MENDEZ, also known as Roman Martinez-Mendez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41001.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jamie Hernandez-Mendez appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation. Hernandez-Mendez argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Hernandez-Mendez’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Hernandez-Mendez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Hernandez-Mendez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.2  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral Partner.By:/s/ Donna UrbainName:Donna UrbainTitle:Principal Financial Officer with respect to Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.Date:July 25, 2008
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Thang Quoc VO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-6026.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 2006.

Decided June 19, 2006.

*403Thang Quoc Vo, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Riley Pedersen, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Thang Quoc Vo seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Vo has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### Terry Dwight SANDERS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. K.J. WENDT, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 06-6141.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 2006.

Decided May 31, 2006.

*390Terry Dwight Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Terry Dwight Sanders, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Sanders v. Wendt,*No. l:04-ev-00-204-FPS (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
H. Res. 26 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 8, 2019. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON RULES: Ms. Matsui and Mr. Perlmutter. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-G  ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 12th day of August, 2005.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-G
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-G and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-G and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3650 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3650

  To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
 fathers of certain permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be 
  included with mothers of such veterans as preference eligibles for 
                    treatment in the civil service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 26, 2010

  Mr. Wyden (for himself, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Voinovich, Ms. Collins, Ms. 
 Landrieu, and Mr. Lieberman) introduced the following bill; which was 
   read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
 fathers of certain permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be 
  included with mothers of such veterans as preference eligibles for 
                    treatment in the civil service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Jessica Ann Ellis Gold Star Fathers 
Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. PREFERENCE ELIGIBLE TREATMENT FOR FATHERS OF CERTAIN 
              PERMANENTLY DISABLED OR DECEASED VETERANS.

    Section 2108(3) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subparagraphs (F) and (G) and inserting the following:
                    ``(F) the parent of an individual who lost his or 
                her life under honorable conditions while serving in 
                the armed forces during a period named by paragraph 
                (1)(A) of this section, if--
                            ``(i) the spouse of that parent is totally 
                        and permanently disabled; or
                            ``(ii) that parent, when preference is 
                        claimed, is unmarried or, if married, legally 
                        separated from his or her spouse;
                    ``(G) the parent of a service-connected permanently 
                and totally disabled veteran, if--
                            ``(i) the spouse of that parent is totally 
                        and permanently disabled; or
                            ``(ii) that parent, when preference is 
                        claimed, is unmarried or, if married, legally 
                        separated from his or her spouse; and''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 90 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```