alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PRAIRIE BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS

TRIBAL COUNCIL RESOLUTION PBP No. 2~~L

Amending PBP Code Sec. 12-3-20(C) and 12-3-2 1

Whereas: The Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians (the Nation) is a duly organized

Tribal entity, with a Constitution and By-Laws approved by the Secretary

of the Interior on February 19, 1976, and amended on August 28, 1985.

Whereas: Pursuant to the Prairie Band Potawatomi Constitution, the Tribal Council is

charged with the duty of protecting the health, security and general welfare

of the Tribe and of regulating law and order on the reservation.

Whereas: -1 he Tribal Council recognizes the need to amend Tribal Law and Order

Code, Gaming Title 12, Sections 12-3-20(C) and 12-3-2 1.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Prairie Band Potawatomi Tribal

Council does hereby amend Section 12-3-20(C) and 12-3-2 1 as follows:

Section 12-3-20(C) To prepare and submit to the General Tribal Councilfor its

approval proposals, including budget and monetary proposals, to enable the Tribe

to carry forth the policies and intent of this Title.

Section 12-3-21. Annual Budget.

The Tribal Commission shall prepare an annual operating budget for

all Tribal Commission activities and present it to the General Tribal

Council by August 15th of each yearfor approval.

CERTIFICATION

This resolution was duly adopted on the 22~ day of March, 2000, at a Meeting of

the Prairie Band Potawatomi Tribal Council, during which ( ..5 members were

present, constituting a quorum, by a vote of ( 9~ ) for, L ~.) opposed, (_~~j

abstaining, ( Z.. ) absent from voting and the Chairperson not voting.

ATTEST: _____________________

Mamie Rupnicki, ç-rperson

________________

/

Mày~ Mattwaoshshe, Acting Secretary

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 22hdday of A4~-~ 1~ 2000.

IA

____________________

James M. Potter I 1~~iry

~

Public

~~

NOTARY PUBLIC I I STArE Of~KANSAS I

AP~T EXO~3
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the filing by Camelot Corporation (the "Company") of the
Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  April  30,  2006  (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operation of the Company.







                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  July 24, 2006
Exhibit No. 21

 

List ofSubsidiaries

 

Thesubsidiaries of Barnwell Industries, Inc., at September 30, 2008were:

 
|                                         |   | Jurisdiction of           |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
| Name of Subsidiary                           |   | Incorporation or  Organization |
|                                         |   |                           |
| Barnwell of Canada, Limited                  |   | Delaware                       |
| Water Resources International, Inc.     |   | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell Hawaiian Properties, Inc.      |   | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell Kona Corporation                    |   | Hawaii                         |
| Kaupulehu Developments                       |   | Hawaii                         |
| Cambridge Hawaii Limited Partnership         |   | Hawaii                         |
| Barnwell Management Co., Inc.           |   | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell Shallow Oil, Inc.              |   | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell Geothermal Corporation              |   | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell Mining Co.                          |   | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell Overseas, Inc.                 |   | Delaware                       |
| Geothermal Exploration and Development Corp. |   | Delaware                       |
| Victoria Properties, Inc.               |   | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell Financial Corporation               |   | Delaware                       |
| NDTX, Inc.                              |   | Delaware                       |
| Barnwell Investment Corporation              |   | Hawaii                         |
| WRI Properties, Inc.                    |   | Hawaii                         |
| Barnwell Alakea Properties, Inc.        |   | Hawaii                         |
| Barnwell Hilo Corporation                    |   | Hawaii                         |
| Kaupulehu Investors, LLC                     |   | Hawaii                         |
| Mauka 3K, LLC                                |   | Hawaii                         |
| Kaupulehu Mauka Investors, LLC               |   | Hawaii                         |
| Kaupulehu 2007, LLLP                         |   | Hawaii                         |
| Barnwell Makai, Inc.                    |   | Hawaii                         |
| Barnwell of Israel, Ltd.                     |   | Israel                         |
| Barnwell Oil & Gas, Ltd.            |   | Israel                         |
| Bill Robbins Drilling, Ltd.                  |   | Alberta, Canada                |
| Gypsy Petroleum Ltd.                         |   | Alberta, Canada                |
| Dartmouth Petroleum, Ltd.                    |   | Alberta, Canada                |
| J.H. Wilson Associates, Ltd.                 |   | Alberta, Canada                |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 282 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 282

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
   importance of local print and digital journalism to the continued 
welfare, transparency, and prosperity of government at every level and 
the continuation and freedom of the United States as it is known today.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2019

Mr. DeSaulnier (for himself, Ms. DeGette, Mr. Raskin, and Ms. Lofgren) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                        on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
   importance of local print and digital journalism to the continued 
welfare, transparency, and prosperity of government at every level and 
the continuation and freedom of the United States as it is known today.

Whereas local print and digital journalism is disappearing at a record rate;
Whereas trust in journalists is at an all-time low nationally, while many local 
        reporters retain the good will and trust of their communities;
Whereas subscriptions to local news have decreased steadily since the spread of 
        the internet;
Whereas nonjournalistic digital media has been falsely labeled and marketed as 
        news;
Whereas corporations are buying local news outlets and cutting budgets and 
        staff, leading to less local coverage;
Whereas local print and digital journalism are essential to promoting good 
        governance at the local and State level; and
Whereas a lack of local news will allow for greater local and statewide 
        political corruption: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) it is in the best interests of Federal, State, and 
        local governments to make all possible efforts to ensure the 
        continuation of robust local digital and print news sources; 
        and
            (2) Congress should work with news outlets and other 
        relevant stakeholders to ensure that local digital and print 
        news continues to operate in a robust manner for years to come.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
The Board of Directors
  BAY STATE GAS COMPANY
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 33-39118, and No. 33-44156) on Form S-3 and in the registration statements
(No. 33-35897, No. 33-22300 and No. 33-22301) on Form S-8 of our report dated
October 24, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets and statements of
capitalization of Bay State Gas Company and subsidiaries as of September 30,
1996 and 1995 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 1996, which report is included in the September 30, 1996 annual
report on Form 10-K of Bay State Gas Company.
 
                                          KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 2, 1996
' /-6 -1!:--

\ / 13L/lJJ'()3 

Abet Acosta, Gler-~< 

..C t-Jovlcf e-f:.o /,'~c /o )/,/oN ''{ "-N/d~~ ~c.._> 

h'f'f:>f>Ne.J CO;V(.c-IN//~ l>lj CG..SC'. 

fr Lf ;YO. Lj ~ 1 /OO c 

tJJ:- J? 3l/b- 03
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 269 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 269

Expressing support for the designation of March 2, 2020, as ``Gold Star 
                      Families Remembrance Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 28, 2019

 Mr. Latta (for himself, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Ms. Stefanik, 
Mrs. Bustos, Mr. Gallagher, Mr. Green of Tennessee, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Cox 
  of California, Mr. Steube, Mr. Moulton, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Turner, 
 Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, Mr. Cisneros, Mrs. Axne, Mr. Wilson of South 
Carolina, and Mr. Byrne) submitted the following resolution; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the 
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of March 2, 2020, as ``Gold Star 
                      Families Remembrance Day''.

Whereas March 2, 2020, marks the 91st anniversary of President Calvin Coolidge 
        signing an Act of Congress that approved and funded the first Gold Star 
        pilgrimage to enable Gold Star families to travel to the gravesites of 
        their loved ones who died during World War I;
Whereas the members and veterans of the Armed Forces of the United States bear 
        the burden of protecting the freedom of the people of the United States; 
        and
Whereas the sacrifices of the families of the fallen members and veterans of the 
        Armed Forces of the United States should never be forgotten: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Gold Star Families 
        Remembrance Day'';
            (2) honors and recognizes the sacrifices made by the 
        families of members and veterans of the Armed Forces of the 
        United States who gave their lives to defend freedom and 
        protect America; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        ``Gold Star Families Remembrance Day'' by--
                    (A) performing acts of service and good will in 
                their communities; and
                    (B) celebrating the lives of those who have made 
                the ultimate sacrifice so that others could continue to 
                enjoy life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
                                 <all>
```
No. 4998.

(Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans,)

#### SUCCESSION OF STEPHEN CAIN.

J. P. Flynn for appellant.

Denegre & Blair and Chaffe for appellee.

.ST. PAUL, J.

This succession was opened in the month of October, 1906, and the widow of the deceased qualified as administratrix. An inventory was taken, according to which the property of the succession consisted of two pieces of real estate appraised respectively at $1,200 and $2,700, furniture appraised at $230 and the *343contents of a barroom appraised at $257.00, tbe total appraisement being $4387.00.

No further proceedings were had until September, 1909, when the administratrix filed a “final account.” In this account she puts down as “receipts” the items of the inventory (less the barroom) at their appraised value, to-wit: furniture, $230; real estate, $3,900; total, $4,130.

This is followed by “disbursements” aggregating $2816.65 leaving “balance to credit of estate” $1313.39.

Taken in connection with the state of the record it would seem that the “receipts” consisted of all the items of the inventory remaining in kind, taken at their appraised value. The “disbursements” apparently represent liabilities of the succession either paid or to be paid.

The account was opposed by one claiming to be a creditor of the succession and asking to be placed on the account for the sum of $97.18. There was judgment in. favor of the opponent, and the administratrix appeals.

We do not see how this matter comes within our jurisdiction. If in view of the absolute solvency of the estate we consider the opposition merely as a claim urged against the succession by way of opposition to the account, instead of by direct action, then “the matter in dispute” being the amount claimed by opponent is only $97.18, and is below our jurisdiction.

If, on the other hand, we are to be guided by the amount of “the fund to be distributed” we are still without jurisdiction, whether the term “fund to be distributed ? ’ means money actually on hand and ready for distribution, or the sum total of all the assets taken charge of and which must eventually be accounted for and distributed, as would seem more likely. (See Perkins vs. Crystal Ice Co., 119 La. 519).

In one case the administratrix has no fund at all to be distributed, in the other the fund exceeds $2000.00. In *344either case this Court has no jurisdiction, for the sum to be distributed is either less than $100.00 or more than $2,000.00. The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed or transferred. But as it is doubtful whether any appellate court has jurisdiction, as the amount is small, and as, after hearing argument on the merits, we think there is no merit in the appeal; we think that there is no reason to .compel the parties to go to the expense of a transcript for the Supreme Court and hence, in the exercise of our discretion, tve will simply dismiss the appeal instead of transferring it.

April 18, 1910.

Rehearing refused May 2, 1910.

Appeal dismissed.
National Indian Gaming Commission

Tribal Gaming Revenues (in thousands) by Region

Fiscal Year 2004 and 2003

 Fiscal Year 2004 Fiscal Year 2003 Increase (decrease) 

Number of Gaming Number of Gaming Number of Gaming Revenu

Operations Revenues Operations Revenues Operations Revenues Percenta

Region I 44 1,601,346 46 1,441,488 (2) 159,858 11.1% Region II 52 5,788,332 54 4,699,889 (2) 1,088,443 23.2% Region III 43 2,133,116 43 1,898,522 0 234,594 12.4% 

Region IV 117 3,815,763 109 3,597,005 8 218,758 6.1% Region V 84 1,248,089 82 867,088 2 381,001 43.9% Region VI 27 4,820,864 24 4,322,134 3 498,730 11.5% Totals 367 19,407,510 358 16,826,126 9 2,581,384 15.3% Source: Complied from gaming operation audit reports received and entered by the NIGC through July 7, 2005.Region I Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington 

Region II California, and Northern Nevada Region III Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Southern Nevada Region IV Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska, 

South Dakota, and Wisconsin 

Region V Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas Region VI Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, 

North Carolina, and New York
#### Teresa Jimenez, Appellant, v Hispanic Catholic Charismatic Center of the Archdiocese of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[822 NYS2d 273]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nelson S. Roman, J.), entered August 22, 2005, which granted the motion of defendant Hispanic Catholic Charismatic Center of the Archdiocese of New York for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated.

Plaintiff attended a religious retreat held on the premises of defendant Hispanic Catholic Charismatic Center of the Archdiocese of New York (the Center). The retreat was several days long and plaintiff was required to stay overnight at the Center, which provided both single beds and bunk beds for the participants. The room to which plaintiff was directed contained three bunk beds and one single bed. Only the top portion of a bunk bed remained available to plaintiff. Despite the presence of three bunk beds there was only one ladder in the room. This ladder, which plaintiff characterized as “little” and “small,” was neither affixed to nor propped up against any of the bunk beds; it was in one of the corners of the room.

On the first evening of the retreat, plaintiff did not use the ladder. Rather, she reached her bunk by stepping first onto the single bed situated near her bunk. The following morning plaintiff descended her bunk in the same manner. According to plaintiff, neither of the two women who slept on top of the other bunk beds used the ladder; they climbed on and off their respective beds.

On the second evening plaintiff again reached her bunk by first stepping onto the single bed. The next morning, however, plaintiff was unable to descend onto the single bed since the bed was occupied by a fellow retreat participant. As plaintiff attempted to climb off her bunk by stepping down onto the bunk below, she fell and sustained injuries.

*417Plaintiff subsequently commenced the instant action against the Center, alleging that it failed to maintain its property in a reasonably safe condition by failing to provide a ladder or other safe means to get in and out of her bunk. The Center moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, arguing that it satisfied the duty of care owed to plaintiff by providing one ladder for all of the bunk beds in the room. Supreme Court granted the motion.

Triable issues of fact exist regarding whether the Center breached its duty to maintain its premises in a reasonably safe condition *(see Basso v Miller,*40 NY2d 233 [1976]), whether such breach was a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries *(see Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp.,*51 NY2d 308 [1980]), and whether plaintiff was comparatively negligent. Accordingly, Supreme Court erred in granting summary judgment in the Center’s favor. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Sweeny, Catterson, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14794]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1278-000]


AES Mountain Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

June 17, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
AES Mountain Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is July 16, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f7b1b2a5b4b8999b9e9992a4828787988583b791928594d9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="01474453424e6f6d686f64527471716e737541676473622f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>. or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-14794 Filed 6-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>