alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following entities, unless otherwise indicated, are wholly-owned direct
or indirect subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 2007:



|    |  |                                                 |  |                                
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|    |  | Name                                            |  | State or Countryof Organization
|1.  |  | Baker Construction, Inc.                        |  | Delaware                       
|2.  |  | Baker Global Project Services, Inc.             |  | Delaware                       
|3.  |  | Baker Holding Corporation                       |  | Delaware                       
|4.  |  | Baker/OTS, Inc.                                 |  | Delaware                       
|5.  |  | International Pipeline Services, Inc.           |  | Delaware                       
|6.  |  | Michael Baker International, Inc.               |  | Delaware                       
|7.  |  | Baker Engineering, Inc.                         |  | Illinois                       
|8.  |  | Michael Baker Architects/Engineers, P.C.        |  | New Jersey                     
|9.  |  | Baker Engineering NY, Inc.                      |  | New York                       
|10. |  | Baker Environmental, Inc.                       |  | Pennsylvania                   
|11. |  | Baker Heavy & Highway, Inc.                     |  | Pennsylvania                   
|12. |  | Baker Mellon Stuart Construction, Inc.          |  | Pennsylvania                   
|13. |  | Michael Baker Global, Inc.                      |  | Pennsylvania                   
|14. |  | Michael Baker Jr., Inc.                         |  | Pennsylvania                   
|15. |  | Baker/MO Services, Inc.                         |  | Texas                          
|16. |  | Vermont General Insurance Company               |  | Vermont                        
|17. |  | Baker Energy International, Ltd.                |  | Cayman Islands                 
|18. |  | Baker O&M International, Ltd.                   |  | Cayman Islands                 
|19. |  | Baker/OTS International, Inc.                   |  | Cayman Islands                 
|20. |  | Overseas Technical Services (Middle East) Ltd.  |  | Cayman Islands                 
|21. |  | Michael Baker de Mexico S.A. de C.V.            |  | Mexico                         
|22. |  | Baker/OTS Ltd.                                  |  | United Kingdom                 
|23. |  | OTS International Training Services Ltd.        |  | United Kingdom                 
|24. |  | Overseas Technical Services (Harrow) Ltd.       |  | United Kingdom                 
|25. |  | SD Forty-Five Ltd.                              |  | United Kingdom                 
|26. |  | OTS Finance and Management Ltd.                 |  | Vanuatu                        
|27. |  | Overseas Technical Services International, Ltd. |  | Vanuatu
**Exhibit 21**

**SUBSIDIARIES OFCONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC.***
| ** **                                                   | ** ** | **Jurisdiction  of  Incorporation** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------|
| Baltimore Gas and Electric Company                           |       | Maryland                            |
| Constellation Holdings, Inc.                            |       | Maryland                            |
| Constellation Investments, Inc.                         |       | Maryland                            |
| Constellation Power, Inc.                               |       | Maryland                            |
| Constellation Real Estate Group, Inc.                   |       | Maryland                            |
| Constellation Enterprises, Inc.                         |       | Maryland                            |
| Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc.            |       | Delaware                            |
| Constellation Energy Projects and Services  Group, Inc. |       | Delaware                            |
| Safe Harbor Water Power Corporation                          |       | Pennsylvania                        |
| BGE Home Products & Services, Inc.             |       | Maryland                            |
| CEG Acquisition, LLC                                         |       | Delaware                            |
| Constellation NewEnergy, Inc                                 |       | Delaware                            |
| Constellation Generation Group, LLC                          |       | Maryland                            |
| Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Inc.                |       | Maryland                            |
| Constellation Power Source Generation, Inc.             |       | Maryland                            |
| Constellation Power Source Holdings, Inc.               |       | Maryland                            |
| BGE Capital Trust II                                         |       | Delaware                            |
| Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC                         |       | Delaware                            |
| R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC                         |       | Maryland                            |

 

----

*    The names of certain indirectly owned subsidiarieshave been omitted because, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary,they would not constitute a significant subsidiary pursuant toRule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Spherix Incorporated**

 

----

 

**Certification of**

**Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

I, Robert L. Clayton,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Spherix Incorporated (the “Company”),in compliance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, herebycertify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission:

 

·                  Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

·                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Robert L. Clayton                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Robert L. Clayton                      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  and Treasurer |
|   | April 3, 2008                     |

 

A signed copy of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SpherixIncorporated and will be retained by Spherix Incorporated and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 34 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 12
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 34

 To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating 
                         the fairness doctrine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2009

  Mr. DeMint (for himself, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Thune, Mr. Alexander, Mr. 
   Barrasso, Mr. Bond, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Coburn, Mr. 
 Cornyn, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Hutchison, 
   Mr. Isakson, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Martinez, Mr. McConnell, Mr. 
   Roberts, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Voinovich, and Mr. Wicker) 
      introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                            January 7, 2009

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating 
                         the fairness doctrine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Broadcaster Freedom Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. FAIRNESS DOCTRINE PROHIBITED.

    Title III of the Communications Act of 1934 is amended by inserting 
after section 303 (47 U.S.C. 303) the following new section:

``SEC. 303A. LIMITATION ON GENERAL POWERS: FAIRNESS DOCTRINE.

    ``Notwithstanding section 303 or any other provision of this Act or 
any other Act authorizing the Commission to prescribe rules, 
regulations, policies, doctrines, standards, or other requirements, the 
Commission shall not have the authority to prescribe any rule, 
regulation, policy, doctrine, standard, or other requirement that has 
the purpose or effect of reinstating or repromulgating (in whole or in 
part) the requirement that broadcasters present opposing viewpoints on 
controversial issues of public importance, commonly referred to as the 
`Fairness Doctrine', as repealed in General Fairness Doctrine 
Obligations of Broadcast Licensees, 50 Fed. Reg. 35418 (1985).''.
                                                        Calendar No. 12

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 34

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating 
                         the fairness doctrine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 7, 2009

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT





The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Base Ten Systems, Inc.
Trenton, New Jersey 08619

   
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
33-89712, No. 33-60454, No. 33-55752 and Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 2-84451 of Base Ten Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 and
the Registration Statement No. 33-89710 of Base Ten Systems, Inc. and
Subsidiaries on Form S-3 of our report dated December 23, 1996, appearing in
this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Base Ten Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries for
the year ended October 31, 1996.
    




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

   
Parsippany, New Jersey
April 2, 1997
    

                                          42
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ronald A.
Durando, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

1.   
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronald A. Durando
Ronald A. Durando
Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2010

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-2112

___________________________

Cordarious Q. Willis

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Chynna Thomas, Correctional Sergeant, Arkansas Division of Correction;

Roderick Johnson, Corporal, Correctional Officer, Arkansas Division of Correction

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central

 ____________

Submitted: April 1, 2024

Filed: April 4, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Cordarious Willis appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After a careful review, we conclude that the

district court did not err in granting judgment for the defendants. See Johnson v.

Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (de novo review). Accordingly, we

affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1The Honorable D.P. Marshall, Jr., then Chief Judge, now United States

District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and

recommendations of the Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 118 (Monday, June 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14539]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Capital Construction Fund--Deposit/Withdrawal Report.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-0041.
    Form Number(s): NOAA Form 34-82.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Number of Respondents: 1,200.
    Average Hours per Response: 20 minutes.
    Burden Hours: 3,600.
    Needs and Uses: Respondents are fishermen holding Fishing Vessel 
Capital Construction Fund (FVCCF) agreements. The FVCCF is a tax-
deferral program for fishing vessel construction, acquisition, or 
reconstruction. Information collected on the NOAA Form 34-82 is used in 
checking for respondents' compliance with program requirements and for 
inconsistencies in their reporting of program-related adjustments to 
their income. The deposit and withdrawal information is also required, 
by the Merchant Marine Act of 1936, to be annually reported to the 
Secretary of Treasury.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#12765a6b7c777952767d713c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90f4d8e9fef5fbd0f4fff3bef7ffe6">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#175376617e7348457864637c726557787a753972786739707861"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aaeecbdcc3cef5f8c5d9dec1cfd8eac5c7c884cfc5da84cdc5dc">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 16, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-14539 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 174 

Recognizing the self-determination of Gibraltar to determine its status as 

a British Overseas Territory. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2019 

Mr. HOLDING (for himself, Mr. BUDD, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. COOPER, Mr. 

HASTINGS, Ms. FRANKEL, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. KILMER, Mr. DIAZBALART, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. KIND, Mr. 

NUNES, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. COLE, Mr. THORNBERRY, and Mr. CHABOT) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the self-determination of Gibraltar to determine 

its status as a British Overseas Territory. 

Whereas the Department of State recognizes Gibraltar as an 

overseas territory of the United Kingdom based on the 

1713 Treaty of Utrecht; 

Whereas the citizens of Gibraltar have freely and democratically expressed their view to remain a British Overseas 

Territory in 1967 and 2002, when 99.6 and 98.48 percent of the Gibraltarians, respectively, voted in a popular 

referenda their wish to remain a British Overseas Territory; 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 174 IH 

Whereas the United States has relied on Gibraltar’s military 

facilities numerous times, including America’s first overseas military intervention in 1801 against the Barbary 

States, World War II, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization intervention in 2011 in Libya; 

Whereas, during World War II, General Dwight Eisenhower 

used Gibraltar as his headquarters to plan the liberation 

of North Africa stating, ‘‘Without it the vital air cover 

would not have been quickly established on the North African fields.’’; 

Whereas the security situation in North Africa and the Middle East continues to underscore the need for the United 

States to maintain secure access to Gibraltar’s military 

facilities; 

Whereas Gibraltar has the right, under the United Nations 

Charter and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to determine its own future; and 

Whereas the United Kingdom is a loyal ally that has stood 

by the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) the United States honors the contribution 

4 that Gibraltar has made to advancing United States 

5 security interests in the Mediterranean region since 

6 1801 and extends its deepest appreciation and 

7 thanks to the Government of Gibraltar and its citi8 zens; and 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 174 IH 

1 (2) the views and rights of Gibraltarians should 

2 always be imperative in any discussion of Gibraltar’s 

3 status as a British Overseas Territory. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KATHREIN GRADY,

Appellant,

v.

CARL H. LINDER, ESQ, an Individual; and GREENSPOON MARDER, 

LLP, a Florida Limited Liability Partnership,

Appellees.

No. 4D2023-1754

[May 9, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michele Towbin Singer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 23-001644 

CACE (21).

David Di Pietro and Rodolfo Mayor of Di Pietro Partners, PLLC, Fort 

Lauderdale, and Kenneth R. Mikos of Law Office of Kenneth R. Mikos, Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

John H. Pelzer of Greenspoon Marder LLP, Fort Lauderdale, and Jose 

Riguera of Keller Landsberg, PA, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3341 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend eligibility for coverage 

under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program with respect 

to certain adult dependents of Federal employees and annuitants, in 

conformance with amendments made by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2010 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Ms. 

MIKULSKI, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KAUFMAN, Mr. KERRY, 

Ms. LANDRIEU, Ms. STABENOW, and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to extend eligibility 

for coverage under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program with respect to certain adult dependents 

of Federal employees and annuitants, in conformance 

with amendments made by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3341 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FEHBP Dependent 

3 Coverage Extension Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEPENDENT COVERAGE UNDER 

5 FEHBP. 

6 (a) PROVISIONS RELATING TO AGE.—Chapter 89 of 

7 title 5, United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in section 8901(5)— 

9 (A) in the matter before subparagraph (A), 

10 by striking ‘‘22 years of age’’ and inserting ‘‘26 

11 years of age’’; and 

12 (B) in the matter after subparagraph (B), 

13 by striking ‘‘age 22’’ and inserting ‘‘age 26’’; 

14 and 

15 (2) in section 8905(c)(2)(B)— 

16 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘22 years of 

17 age’’ and inserting ‘‘26 years of age’’; and 

18 (B) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘age 22’’ and 

19 inserting ‘‘age 26’’. 

20 (b) PROVISIONS RELATING TO MARITAL STATUS.— 

21 Chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, is further 

22 amended— 

23 (1) in section 8901(5) and subsections 

24 (b)(2)(A), (c)(2)(B), (e)(1)(B), and (e)(2)(A) of sec25 tion 8905a, by striking ‘‘an unmarried dependent’’ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3341 IS

1 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘a dependent’’; 

2 and 

3 (2) in section 8905(c)(2)(B), by striking ‘‘un4 married dependent’’ and inserting ‘‘dependent’’. 

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall become effective as if included in the en7 actment of section 1001 of the Patient Protection and Af8 fordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148), except that the 

9 Director of the Office of Personnel Management may im10 plement such amendments for such periods before the ef11 fective date otherwise provided in section 1004(a) of such 

12 Act as the Director may specify. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 83 5- CR Sonia SUA RE Z , Appellant
v . The STA TE of Texas, Appellee Fr om the 399th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2006-CR-9375 Honora ble J uanita A . Vasque z-Gardne r, Judge Pre siding

PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Sandee B ry an Mar ion , J ustice

Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Marc h 4, 2009 DI SMI SSED The trial c ourt signe d a ce rtification of de fenda nt’s rig ht to appeal stating that this “is a pleabarg ain ca se, and the defe ndant has NO rig ht of appe al.” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 2 5. 2( a )( 2) . Ru le 25.2(d) pr ovides, “The appea l must be dismi ssed if a cer tification that shows the def endant ha s the rig ht of appe al has not bee n made p ar t o f the re cord unde r these r ules.” T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d).04
- 08
- 00 83 5- CR

- 2- Acc ording ly , on J anuar

y 6, 2009, this court issued an order stating this appe al would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unle ss an amende d trial court c ertification that shows d ef en dant has the rig ht of appe al was ma de par t of the appe llate rec ord. Se e Da nie ls v . S tat e , 1 1 0 S. W. 3 d

1 7 4 ( T e x. Ap p. —Sa n A nto nio 20 03 , o rd e r) ; T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1. No amende d cer

tification has bee n filed. I n light of the reco rd p resented, Rule 25.2(d) require s this court to dismi ss this appeal. Ac cording ly , this appeal is dismissed.

PER C URI AM

DO NO T PU B L I SH