alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

## Notice of Meeting

The ACRS Subcommittee on Future Plant Designs will hold a meeting on July 7, 2009, Commission Hearing Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

                    The meeting will be open to public attendance.                          ( print page 28584)    

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

### Tuesday, July 7, 2009—1:30 p.m.-5 p.m.

The Subcommittee will review the draft final Regulatory Guide 1.215 (DG-1204), “Guidance for ITAAC Closure under 10 CFR part 52,” and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) guidance document NEI 08-01, Revision 3, “Industry Guideline for the ITAAC Closure Process Under 10 CFR part 52.” The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, NEI, and other interested persons regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the Full Committee.

                    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. Girija Shukla, (Telephone: 301-415-6855) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted. Detailed procedures for the conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 6, 2008 (73 FR 58268-58269).                

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:15 a.m. and 5 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

                        Dated:                         *June 10, 2009*.                    

Antonio F Dias,

Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B, Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.

[FR Doc. E9-14115 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of

INDEPENDENT BANCSHARES, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Independent BancShares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Mark A. Imes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Dennis M. Clarke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Mark A. Imes                      |  |  |  | /s/ Dennis M. Clarke   
|Mark A. Imes                          |  |  |  | Dennis M. Clarke       
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                                      |  | 
|Date: November 6, 2007                |  |  |  | Date: November 6, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 15 (Monday, January 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OA08-62-000]


California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of 
FERC Staff Attendance

January 15, 2009.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that on January 16, 2009 members of its staff will participate 
in a teleconference to be conducted by the California Independent 
System Operator (CAISO) regarding the CAISO's 2009 transmission plan. 
Further information and documents for the teleconference can be 
obtained at: http://www.caiso.com.
    Sponsored by the CAISO, this teleconference is open to all market 
participants, and Commission staff's participation is part of the 
Commission's ongoing outreach efforts. This meeting may discuss matters 
at issue in the above captioned docket.
    For further information, contact Saeed Farrokhpay at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c6b5a7a3a3a2e8a0a7b4b4a9adaeb6a7bf86a0a3b4a5e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3043515555541e565142425f5b5840514970565542531e575f46">[email protected]</span></a>; (916) 294-0233 or Maury Kruth at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8fe2eefafdf6a1e4fdfafbe7cfe9eafdeca1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c111d090e0552170e0908143c1a190e1f521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>, (916) 294-0275.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-1473 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
95-42.

#### State v. Wogenstahl.

Hamilton App. No. C-930222. Upon consideration of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to continue stay of execution in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies, and it appearing from a notice filed contemporaneously with the motion, that a petition for post-conviction relief has been filed by appellant with the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that execution of sentence be, and the same is hereby, stayed pending the exhaustion of all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state, including any appeals.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant and for the appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state have been exhausted.
*Tuesday, February 25, 1997*

MOTION DOCKET

96-285.

#### State v. Eley.

Mahoning App. No. 87 C.A. 122. Upon consideration of the motion for stay of execution of death sentence pending the timely filing and final disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court and the motion for stay during pendency of post-conviction remedies, and it appearing from the exhibits to the motion that a petition for post-conviction relief has been filed by appellant with the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motions be, and the same are hereby, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that compliance with the mandate and execution of sentence be, and hereby are, stayed pending the timely filing of the petition in the Supreme Court of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if such petition is timely filed, this stay shall continue for an indefinite period pending final disposition of this cause by the Supreme Court of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this stay shall remain in effect until exhaustion of all state post-conviction proceedings, including any appeals.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant and for the appellee shall notify this court upon a final disposition by the Supreme Court of the United States or when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state have been exhausted, whichever occurs later.
#### In the Matter of Maureen S. Hoerger et al., Appellants, v Thomas J. Spota III et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 21, 2013;

decided August 21, 2013

Motion by District Attorneys Association of the State of New York for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

NO. 2024 KW 0060

JAMARCUS TATE MARCH 22, 2024

In Re: Jamarcus Tate, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

No. 10- 17- 0308. 

BEFORE: MCCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED AS MOOT. The records of the East Baton Rouge

Parish Clerk of Court' s Office reflect that the district court

acted on relator' s " Motion to Run Sentence Concurrent" on

December 18, 2023. 

PMC

CHH

SMM

OURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERK OIE- COURT

FOR THE COURT
#### Kulwant Singh GILL, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-73574.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 19, 2006.

Filed June 20, 2006.

Robert B. Jobe, Esq., Law Offices of Robert B. Jobe, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Susan K. Houser, Esq., Stacy S. Paddack, Tracy L. Hilmer, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: RYMER and WARDLAW, *736Circuit Judges, and WARE,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable James Ware, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Kulwant Singh Gill petitions for review of the Bureau of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying his application for asylum. We grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

The BIA’s summary affirmance included a footnote stating that it did not affirm the IJ’s adverse credibility determination. While the inclusion of that footnote violated the BIA regulation governing decisions affirming without opinion, *see Kumar v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 520, 523 (9th Cir.2006) (citing 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(4)), Gill does not argue that he was “prejudiced by the footnote or that the violation of the regulation affected the outcome of the proceedings,” *id.*at 524.

Gill argued, before the IJ, in his Notice of Appeal, and before this court, that he was persecuted on the basis of an imputed political opinion when he was mistaken for a Sikh militant with the same name. The IJ determined that Gill could not have been persecuted on the basis of a protected ground because his was just a case of mistaken identity. Although we recognize that “[i]n establishing an imputed political opinion, the focus of inquiry turns away from the views of the victim to the views of the persecutor,” *Sangha v. INS,*103 F.3d 1482, 1489 (9th Cir.1997), we find nothing in our own case law, nor any precedential BIA opinion, that addresses the precise question at issue here: whether imputed political opinion may exist when the persecutors believe that the individual they are persecuting holds particular political views *because*they have mistaken him for another person.

Therefore, we GRANT the petition for review and REMAND to allow the BIA an opportunity to issue a precedential decision on this question in the first instance. *INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16-17, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam). Because the BIA previously rejected the IJ’s adverse credibility determination, on remand, Gill’s testimony should be treated as credible and truthful. *Kumar,*439 F.3d at 521.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED. REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of China Tel Group, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George Alvarez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: May 16, 2011
By: /s/ George AlvarezGeorge Alvarez, Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133482 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices v SC: 133482 

 COA: 266894 

Macomb CC: 2005-000166-FH 

FRANK JOHN WEBER, III,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000014407
<NAME> EASTERN EDISON COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       556528
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      16010
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           81311
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        121233
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  775082
<COMMON>                                         72284
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        47206
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             120723
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  240213
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            27035
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            222402
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                2040
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  283392
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   775082
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       404808
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             16058
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      340736
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      356794
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          48014
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                3535
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   51549
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         18578
<NET-INCOME>                                     32971
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       1988
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    30983
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         34320
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        15233
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           72856
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Williams certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of Broadband Wireless
International Corporation, Inc., for the twelve month period ended March 31,
2004.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

<PAGE>

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.



/s/ MICHAEL WILLIAMS
---------------------------------
Michael Williams
President

Date: August 19, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 15 (Monday, January 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1478]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL09-28-000]


City of Pasadena, CA; Notice of Filing

January 2, 2009.
    Take notice that on December 23, 2008, the City of Pasadena, 
California filed its fourth annual revision to its Transmission Revenue 
Balancing Account Adjustment, to become effective January 1, 2009.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#084e4d5a4b47666461666d5b7d7878677a7c486e6d7a6b266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="397f7c6b7a76575550575c6a4c4949564b4d795f5c4b5a175e564f">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 22, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-1478 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
H. Res. 415 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 4, 2019. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6) to authorize the cancellation of removal and adjustment of status 

of certain aliens, and for other purposes. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived. An amendment 

in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules 

Committee Print 116–16, modified by the amendment printed 

in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 

resolution, shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 

amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, 

as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and rank-
2 

•HRES 415 EH 

ing minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and 

(2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.