alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24.1


                              POWER OF ATTORNEY


          KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each individual whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Thomas E. Gardner and William F.
Hackett, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents
with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead in
any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Base Ten
Systems, Inc. for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1997 and any amendments
thereto, and to file same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of
1934, and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of
them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue thereof.




                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Thomas E. Gardner



                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       William F. Hackett



                                       /s/ Alexander M. Adelson
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Alexander M. Adelson



                                       /s/ Alan S. Poole
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Alan S. Poole



                                       /s/ David C. Batten
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       David C. Batten


                                       /s/ William Sword
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       William Sword
#### Roselyne Gisors, Appellant, v New York City Department of Education for the City School District Region 10 et al., Respondents.

Submitted May 29, 2012;

decided August 28, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          812731
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    37506
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     582002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1482797
<PP&E>                                          403932
<DEPRECIATION>                                  291698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1601131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            79081
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2485
<OTHER-SE>                                     1511142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1601131
<SALES>                                        1080031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1080031
<CGS>                                           785130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                380404
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (65679)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (704)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (64975)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (64975)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7246

DONNIE ORVILLE BUNDICK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-91-105-R, CA-95-513-R)

Submitted: March 31, 1997 Decided: May 20, 1997

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnie Orville Bundick, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Urban Baer,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Donnie Bundick appeals from the district court's order denying

his motion brought under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We dismiss.

Our review of Bundick's application to proceed on appeal without the prepayment of fees under the Prison Litigation Reform Act

reveals that he made a false allegation of poverty. Specifically,

Bundick stated on September 1, 1996, that he was not employed, that

he had not been employed since 1990, and that he had not received

within the past twelve months income from any source. Prison records, however, reveal that Bundick was employed and received pay at

least for the time period between October of 1995 and July of 1996.

This false allegation, bearing directly on Bundick's financial

capability, compels us to dismiss his appeal under 28 U.S.C.A. §

1915(e)(2) (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
96-2653.

#### State ex rel. Repasz v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 95APD11-1433. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. On April 8, 1997, appellant filed a request for oral argument, which was due under S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(2)(B) no later than April 7, 1997. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the untimely filing of a request for oral argument,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that appellant’s request for oral argument be, and hereby is, stricken.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002      In connection with the Annual Report of Lexington Energy Services Inc. (the "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Robert Rosner,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Robert Rosner ------------------- Robert Rosner President and Chief Executive Officer  April 21, 2008
**Exhibit No. 32**

BarnwellIndustries, Inc.

Certification ofChief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer Pursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of theundersigned officers of Barnwell Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge that:

TheAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006 of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial conditionas of September 30, 2006 and consolidated results of operations for the yearended September 30, 2006 of the Company and its subsidiaries.
| Dated: | December 19, 2006 |                           |   | /s/ Morton H.  Kinzler  |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |              | Name: Morton H. Kinzler        |
|   |              | Title: Chief Executive Officer |
|   |              |                           |
|   |              |                           |
| Dated: | December 19, 2006 |                           |   | /s/ Russell M.  Gifford |   |
|   |              | Name: Russell M. Gifford       |
|   |              | Title: Chief Financial Officer |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part ofthe Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

Asigned original of the written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Exhibit 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  following  Registration
Statements  of  our  report  dated  January  26,  1998,   with  respect  to  the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Black & Decker Corporation
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


Registration Statement Number               Description

33-6610                                     Form S-8
33-6612                                     Form S-8
33-26917                                    Form S-8
33-26918                                    Form S-8
33-33251                                    Form S-8
33-39608                                    Form S-3
33-47651                                    Form S-8
33-47652                                    Form S-8
33-53807                                    Form S-3
33-58795                                    Form S-8
33-65013                                    Form S-8
333-03593                                   Form S-8
333-03595                                   Form S-8


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
February 16, 1998
# Developmental Dyspraxia

## What is developmental dyspraxia? 

Developmental dyspraxia is a disorder characterized by an impairment in the ability to plan and carry out sensory and motor tasks. Generally, individuals with the disorder appear "out of sync" with their environment. Although individuals with the disorder may be of average or above average intelligence, they may behave immaturely. Symptoms vary and may include:

                    - Poor balance and coordination
                    - Clumsiness
                    - Vision problems
                    - Perception difficulties
                    - Emotional and behavioral problems

                    - Difficulty with reading, writing, and speaking
                    - Poor social skills
                    - Poor posture
                    - Poor short-term memory

Treatment is symptomatic and supportive and may include occupational and speech therapy, and "cueing" or other forms of communication such as using pictures and hand gestures. Many children with the disorder require special education.

Developmental dyspraxia is a lifelong disorder. Many individuals are able to compensate for their disabilities through occupational and speech therapy.

file-medical

## How can I or my loved one help improve care for people with developmental dyspraxia?

Consider participating in a clinical trial so clinicians and scientists can learn more about developmental dyspraxia and related disorders. Clinical research uses human volunteers to help researchers learn more about a disorder and perhaps find better ways to safely detect, treat, or prevent disease. 

All types of volunteers are needed—those who are healthy or may have an illness or disease—of all different ages, sexes, races, and ethnicities to ensure that study results apply to as many people as possible, and that treatments will be safe and effective for everyone who will use them. 

For information about participating in clinical research visit NIH Clinical Research Trials and You. Learn about clinical trials currently looking for people with developmental dyspraxia at Clinicaltrials.gov.
> Where can I find more information about developmental dyspraxia?
More information is available from the following organizations:

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)Phone: 800-638-8255 or 301-296-5650

MedlinePlus

book-open
----

**POWER      OF ATTORNEY**

| /s/                Alan M. Bennett              Alan                M. Bennett                  | /s/                Linda Johnson Rice                Linda                Johnson Rice    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/                Catherine M. Burzik              Catherine                M. Burzik          | /s/                William H. Waltrip                William                H. Waltrip    |
| /s/                Domenico De Sole               Domenico                De Sole          | /s/                Barry W. Wilson               Barry                W. Wilson                |
| /s/                Paul A. Friedman                Paul                A. Friedman    | /s/                Kenneth L. Wolfe                 Kenneth                L. Wolfe  |
| /s/                Jonathan S. Linen                Jonathan                S. Linen  | /s/                Ronald L. Zarrella                Ronald                L. Zarrella    |
| /s/                Ruth R. McMullin                Ruth                R. McMullin    |                                                                                                                                                                           |
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 322 

Recognizing the National Association of Letter Carriers one-day food drive. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2019 

Mr. JOYCE of Ohio (for himself, Mr. RYAN, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. TURNER, Mr. 

JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. GIBBS, and Ms. KAPTUR) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the National Association of Letter Carriers oneday food drive. 

Whereas the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) 

began their one-day food drive in 1992; 

Whereas for many years prior to 1992, a number of NALC 

branches collected food for the needy in the communities 

they served; 

Whereas in 1992, 10 cities were selected to explore a coordinated effort, and a pilot food drive was held in Columbus, 

Ohio, by Branch 78 of the NALC; 

Whereas the pilot food drive was so successful that the food 

drive was then expanded nationwide; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 322 IH 

Whereas a nationwide one-day food drive was organized for 

May 15, 1993, with the goal of having at least one 

NALC Branch participate in each of the 50 States; 

Whereas more than 220 NALC branches participated in the 

first national one-day food drive and set a one-day record 

for food collection in the United States by collecting more 

than 11,000,000 pounds of food; 

Whereas in 2018, the NALC collected over 71,600,000 

pounds of food to help restock food banks, pantries, and 

shelters throughout the United States; 

Whereas 2018 marked the 15th consecutive year that the Nation’s largest one-day food drive collected more than 

70,000,000 pounds of food; 

Whereas the NALC one-day food drive has collected more 

than 1,670,000,000 pounds of food since it began in 

1993; and 

Whereas the NALC one-day food drive occurs on the second 

Saturday in May each year: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the National Association of Let3 ter Carriers’ one-day food drive; and 

4 (2) honors the National Association of Letter 

5 Carriers for their distinguished community service 

6 and philanthropic efforts. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
fs1a2ex10xiv_chinacomm.htm


Exhibit 10.14


 


China Commercial Credit, Inc.


No. 1688, Yunli Road, Tongli


Wujiang, Jiangsu Province


People’s Republic of China


(86-0512) 6396-0022












August 1, 2012







Regeneration Capital Group, LLC


156 West 56th Street


Suite 1605


New York, NY 10019


Attn: Richard Kaufman







Dear Mr. Kaufman,


 


Reference is made to (i) certain subscription agreements (“Series A Subscription Agreements”) pursuant to which China Commercial Credit, Inc. (the “Company”) issued shares of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Stock”) to certain accredited investors; (ii) certain subscription agreements (“Series B Subscription Agreements”) pursuant to which the Company issued shares of its Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Stock”) to certain accredited investors; and (iii) the issuance of a total of 540,000 shares of our common stock to Regeneration Capital Group, LLC (“Regeneration”) on December 19, 2011 in consideration of the incorporation services Regeneration rendered (the “Regeneration Shares”).  As per the terms of their respective certificates of designations, each share of the Series A Stock and Series B Stock outstanding on the day on which the Company consummates its initial public offering (the “Offering”) will, automatically and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, convert into issued and outstanding shares of our common stock. The number of shares of common stock to be issued upon conversion of the Series A Stock will be the purchase price of the Series A Stock divided by a per share conversion price equal to 50% of the Offering price.  The number of shares of common stock to be issued upon conversion of Series B Stock will be the purchase price of the Series B Stock divided by a per share conversion price equal to 25% of the Offering price. It is acknowledged and agreed that it was the Company’s and Regeneration’s intention that upon the consummation of the Offering, the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Stock and Series B Stock would come from the Regeneration Shares and not newly issued shares of the Company.







To reflect your agreement to the foregoing, please sign below and return to us a copy of this letter agreement.


 




	 	
Very truly yours,

	 
	 	 	 
	 	
China Commercial Credit, Inc.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ Huichun Qin	 
	 	Name: 	Huichun Qin	 
	 	Title: 	CEO and President	 










	

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:



	 
	 	 
	

Regeneration Capital Group, LLC



	 
	 	 	 
	
By: 

	/s/ Richard Kaufman	 
	Name: 	Richard Kaufman	 
	Title: 	CEO
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 9, 

2024

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00181-CV

DAKOTA OEHLERT, Appellant

V.

GIGI GEAN WALLACE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 461st District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 120953-F

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from an order signed February 29, 2024. On April 24, 

2024, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The 

motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  22,389
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      44
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>             65,775
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                  32,979
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                    33,234
<LOANS>                                302,469
<ALLOWANCE>                              4,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         442,953
<DEPOSITS>                             386,670
<SHORT-TERM>                             5,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                      8,084
<LONG-TERM>                              7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                 9,715
<OTHER-SE>                              26,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>         422,953
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         27,059
<INTEREST-INVEST>                        5,984
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           376
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        33,419
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      14,433
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      15,189
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   18,230
<LOAN-LOSSES>                            1,459
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          (6)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         15,737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          7,843
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>               7,843
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             5,245
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             2.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                             2.52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                            4.73
<LOANS-NON>                                893
<LOANS-PAST>                               367
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           210
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                          1,507
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                         3,525
<CHARGE-OFFS>                            1,111
<RECOVERIES>                               252
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                        4,125
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                     2,491
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                          0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                  1,634
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Saab Defense and Security USA LLC, ) 

f/k/a Saab Training USA LLC ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W56HZV-11-D-0150 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59732 

Timothy Sullivan, Esq. 

Jayna Marie Rust, Esq. 

Thompson Coburn LLP 

Washington, DC 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

CPT Vera A. Strebel, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 14 July 2015 

//~:~· MARK N. STEMPLER 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59732, Appeal of Saab Defense and 

Security USA LLC, f/k/a Saab Training USA LLC, rendered in conformance with the 

Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals