alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Elwood Shepard, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the ACompany@), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and   Date: August 17, 2006 By: /s/ Elwood Shepard Elwood Shepard Chief Executive Officer  Chief Financial Officer
97-11.

#### Smith v. Ohio Dept. of Human Serv.

Clermont App. No. CA96-05-045. Reported at 78 Ohio St.3d 1439, 676 N.E.2d 1186. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Michael D. Dale, Chief Executive Officer of ATS Medical, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); andThe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.     Date: November 8, 2007         /s/ Michael D. Dale   Name: Michael D. Dale  Title: Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE

JORGE GONZALEZ,

RELATOR. §

§

§

§ No. 08

- 15

- 00320

- CR

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus

against the Honorable Annabell Perez, Judge of the 41st District Court of El Paso County, Texas,

and concludes Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We t herefore deny the

petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodrigu ez, and Hughes, JJ.
T00'd “96 OT:T2 Tt0%-St-aad

Picayune Rancheria
of the

CHUKCHANSI INDIANS

46575 Road 417 + Coarsegold, CA 93614 + (559) 683-6633 » FAX (559) 683-0599

February 15, 2011

SENT VIA U.S. MAIL & FAC: E (202) 632-7066.
National Indian Gaming Commission

1441 L. Street, NW, Suite 9100

Washington, D.C. 20005

Att: Tracie Stevens, Chairwoman

Re: — NIGC Notice of Inquiry Comments
Dear Chairwoman Stevens:

The following comments are submitted on behalf of the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians
(Tribe) in response to the recent National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) Notice of Inquiry as
published in the Federal Register on November 18, 2010 (NOI):

1) The Tribe requests the NIGC to preserve the current Class II Minimum Internal Control
Standard (MICS) re; ions.

Because the Tribe has an NIGC approved Tribal Gaming Ordinance that provides for NIGC Class
Ill MICS oversight, preservation of the NIGC class iI] MICS regulations is vital to maintaining
the current effective level of Class II MICS oversight activities.

2) The Tribe requests the NIGC to continue to develop its tribal consultation and communication
process and protocol.

Although most NIGC activities involving the Tribe are handled directly through the Picayune
Rancheria Tribal Gaming Commission (PRTGC) as the primary regulatory authority within the
Tribe’s jurisdiction, the Tribe believes it is best to include both the Tribal Chairperson and
PRTGC Chairperson in all NIGC notices, correspondence and any other communications in order
to ensure the best communication of NIGC activities with the Tribe.

The Tribe enjoys an excellent government-to-government relationship with the NIGC and values the
regulatory assistance your agency provides to the Tribe on both national and regional levels. To that end,
the Tribe respectfully requests you consider the above comments accordingly prior to issuing any final
rule or decision on the matters addressed in the recent NOI. If you have any questions, please contact our
regulatory attorneys, Rosette & Associates, PC, at (916) 353-1084.

Sincerely,

)Z 7
Lng bs
Nancy Ayala, Vie cneenen

ce: Picayune Rancheria Tribal Gaming Commission

1700/1002) XWd  6T'8T BML TIOZ/ST/Z0
[Cite as State v. Burns, 2022-Ohio-250.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WARREN COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, 

 Appellee, 

 - vs - 

SHANE BURNS, 

 Appellant. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

CASE NO. CA2021-09-081 

D E C I S I O N 

 1/31/2022 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. 21CR37664 

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 

Ostrowski Law Firm Co., L.P.A., and Andrea G. Ostrowski, for appellant. 

 Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, Shane Burns, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of 

proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and 

upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of 
Warren CA2021-09-081 

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; 

(2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine 

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both 

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous. 

M. POWELL, P.J., PIPER and BYRNE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              36
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,017
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,192
<PP&E>                                           5,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,254
<BONDS>                                          1,434
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        300
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,945
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,826
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    368
<INCOME-TAX>                                       120
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                248
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     77
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       325
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the consolidated financial statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                             666
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    15800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 16466
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  633883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            47570
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      13453
<COMMON>                                         62937
<OTHER-SE>                                      509923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    633883
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            59498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    59498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (934807)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (994305)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (999105)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (999105)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (999105)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals.

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number: 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/10/2015 11:00:37 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-K
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,340
<OTHER-SE>                                      (5,758)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,582
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (15)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     15
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 15
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        15
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>*Less than $.01 per share
</FN>

        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1765 

KURT G. SCHLEGEL, Assignee of Piedmont

Building and Development Corporation,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BANK OF AMERICA, NA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District

Judge. (3:07-cv-00022-nkm)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 17, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kurt G. Schlegel, Appellant Pro Se. Megan Conway Rahman, TROUTMAN

& SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kurt G. Schlegel appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his civil conspiracy complaint and denying his motion

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA, No. 3:07-cv00022-nkm (W.D. Va. June 12 & July 23, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derek Chisholm, Appellant.

Submitted July 9, 2012;

decided August 28, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Exhibit 10.1



[bfdi_ex101002.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex101004.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex101006.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex101008.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex101010.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex101012.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex101014.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex101016.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex101018.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex101020.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex101022.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex101024.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex101026.gif]
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the filing by Camelot Corporation (the "Company") of the
Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  April  30,  2006  (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operation of the Company.







                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  July 24, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

K.L.B.,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

CUMBERLAND COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 916 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of June, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### In the Matter of Council of the City of New York, Respondent, v Department of Homeless Services of the City of New York et al., Appellants.

Submitted August 5, 2013;

decided August 22, 2013

Motion by Coalition for the Homeless et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein denied.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 215 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee 

on Intelligence in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2019 

Mr. SCHIFF (for himself and Mr. NUNES) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select 

Committee on Intelligence in the One Hundred Sixteenth 

Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee 

4 on Intelligence (hereafter in this resolution referred to as 

5 the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff sala6 ries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $15,264,953 for the One 

9 Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 215 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $7,550,369 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2019, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2020; and 

7 (2) not more than $7,714,584 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2020, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2021. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10(cc)(2)


The Black & Decker Corporation           Leonard A. Strom
701 East Joppa Road, TW 235              Senior Vice President - Human Resources
Towson, Maryland  21286
410 716 3525


March 30, 1998


Mr. Frederik B van den Bergh
Le Cret Chemin de la Sabliere
74140 Chens le Pont
FRANCE


Dear Frits:

This is an amendment  to our offer  letter  dated May 9, 1997.  Section 6 of the
letter states that it is a condition of our offer that you relocate your home to
be within a reasonable  commuting distance of Slough prior to September 1, 1998.
We have agreed at your  request to extend the  relocation  date by one year,  to
September 1, 1999. All other terms and conditions of our letter agreement remain
in full force and effect.

If you concur with this change,  please sign, date, and return the enclosed copy
of this letter to indicate your acceptance.

Sincerely,


THE BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION


/s/LEONARD A. STROM
--------------------                                 
Leonard A. Strom
Senior Vice President
Human Resources



ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

/s/FREDERIK B. VAN DEN BERGH       21/April/1998
-----------------------------      -------------
Frederik B. van den Bergh          Date