alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


NAME                                               STATE OF INCORPORATION
-----------------------------------                ----------------------
Athey Products International, Inc.                 Barbados



                                       27
<PAGE>
                 SCHEDULE II--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Balance at         Charges         Deductions              Balance at
                                                      Beginning        to Profit           from                   End of
Description                                            of Year          and Loss         Reserves                  Year
-----------                                            -------          --------         --------                  ----
<S>                                                       <C>              <C>               <C>                    <C>
Year Ended December 31, 1999:
-----------------------------
Allowance for doubtful                                    $ 285,280        $ (64,219)        $ 64,030  (a)          $ 157,031
    accounts-trade
Provision for obsolete
    and slow moving inventory                               970,373          129,627                -               1,100,000
Provision for lower of cost or market                       910,633                -          160,633                 750,000
Provision for warranty costs                              1,746,166          621,563        1,267,729  (c)          1,100,000

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998:
-----------------------------
Allowance for doubtful                                    $ 200,000        $ 117,194         $ 31,914  (a)          $ 285,280
    accounts-trade
Provision for obsolete
    and slow moving inventory                               760,000        1,050,104          839,731  (b)            970,373
Provision for lower of cost or market                        80,775          829,858                -                 910,633
Provision for warranty costs                              1,276,000        2,481,389        2,011,223  (c)          1,746,166

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997:
-----------------------------
Allowance for doubtful                                    $ 350,000              $ -        $ 150,000               $ 200,000
    accounts-trade
Provision for obsolete
    and slow moving inventory                               500,000          513,784          253,784  (b)            760,000
Provision for lower of cost or market                             -           80,775                -                  80,775
Provision for warranty costs                                690,000        2,263,565        1,677,565  (c)          1,276,000

</TABLE>
(a)  Uncollected trade receivables written off.
(b)  Deduction for obsolete inventory scrapped or sold at reduced selling price.
(c)  Warranty expenses incurred.

                                       28
<PAGE>
#### MAHON v. BENNETT et al.

No. 4177.

District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D.

Oct. 14, 1946.

Stinson, Mag, Thomson, McEvers & Fizzell, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Herman M. Langworthy and Charles M. Miller, both of Kansas City, Mo., for defendants.

REEVES, District Judge.

This is an action upon two contracts, one oral and the other written. The oral contract preceded the written contract and according to the averments of the complaint the plaintiff was coerced into the signing of the written contract. He charges, however, that both ox them have been violated and the relief prayed is largely predicated upon the alleged oral agreements.

The defendants by their motion ask the court to require the plaintiff to specify when the oral contract was made and thereafter to specify wherein and in what manner the plaintiff was coerced and put in such duress as to cause him to sign the written agreement. Counsel for the defendants courteously ask for an oral argument on the defendants’ motion.

1. The cases cited by the defendants in support of the motion are cases decided long before the promulgation of the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Both by the rules and by practice it is permissible to make general averments. This is true for the reason that the new rules provide for discovery so that all information not revealed in the complaints might be obtained by the simple method of making inquiry or by deposition or interrogatories.

2. It is alleged in the complaint that negotiations for the oral contract began in November, 1944, and continued over a period of several months before ultimately crystallizing into an oral agreement. It would be a simple matter to ask counsel for the plaintiff when it is contended such oral agreement was consummated. The written agreement bears date March 12, 1945, so that the intervening time between November, 1944, and March 12,1945, is a very brief period. Some where between these two dates the oral contract was made.

3. The same thing is true with respect to the alleged coercion or duress. The plaintiff should acquaint the defendants with the nature of the duress, but this can be done by answering questions rather than by amendment to the complaint. Under the rules it is contemplated that complaints should not be amplified or extended in view of the discovery rules. The complaint is entirely sufficient to enable the defendants to answer, and this they should do.

Counsel for the defendants will be granted 20 days to answer or plead further.
**EXHIBIT 10(g)**

THE BLACK & DECKER2003 STOCK OPTION PLAN 

The proper execution of the dutiesand responsibilities of the executives and other key employees of The Black &Decker Corporation and its subsidiaries is a vital factor in the continued growth andsuccess of the Corporation. Toward this end, it is necessary to attract and retaineffective and capable employees to assume positions that contribute materially to thesuccessful operation of the business of the Corporation. It will benefit the Corporation,therefore, to bind the interests of these persons more closely to its own interests byoffering them an attractive opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in theCorporation and thereby provide them with added incentive to remain in its employ and toincrease the prosperity, growth, and earnings of the Corporation. This stock option planwill serve these purposes. 

ARTICLE 1:00 

Definitions 

The following terms wherever usedherein shall have the meanings set forth below.
_________________________________________________________ 

 

_________________________________________________________ 

 

 

_________________________ 

 

NAME: 
 

CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT 

Full-time Tour of Duty - : Your initial tour of duty will be full-time (8 hours per day, 40 

hours per week) on a WHEN ACTUALLY EMPLOYED basis. Your services will not be 

required at certain times due to lack of funds, lack of work, weather conditions, or for 

other reasons. During these periods you will be placed in a nonpay status. It is 

expected that you will work at least 6 months and must be available to work up to, but 

not to exceed, 11 1/2 months each calendar year. You will be entitled to life insurance, 

health, and retirement benefits, within-grade increases, holiday pay, and sick/annual 

leave accrual, based upon the time worked. Federal Employees Health Benefits 

premiums must be paid by the employee throughout the calendar year, including 

periods of nonpay status. 

I certify that I have read and understand the conditions of employment cited above. 

(Signature of Appointee) 

(Office) 

(Date) 

P-9 (07/02)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 118 (Monday, June 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14514]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; ``NIAID/Division of AIDS: Clinical 
Site and Study Monitoring''.
    Date: July 8, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Hilton Washington DC/Rockville Hotel & Executive, 1750 
Rockville Pike, Lincoln Room, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Clayton C Huntley, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID/DHHS, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2570, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#107378657e647c7569507e797179743e7e79783e777f66"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e08388958e948c8599a08e89818984ce8e8988ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; R13 Conference Grants.
    Date: July 16, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Michelle M Timmerman, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, NIH/NIAID/DHHS, Room 3147, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-4573, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cbbfa2a6a6aeb9a6aaa5a68ba5a2aaa2afe5a5a2a3e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f5819c9898908798949b98b59b9c949c91db9b9c9ddb929a83">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 11, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-14514 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 4958.

(Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.)

#### IN RE STATE REALTY COMPANY, LIMITED, PRAYING FOR POSSESSION.

F. R. Richardson, Richardson & Soule, Humphrey & Daly, W. A. Bahns for appellee.

Rossi & Forman for appellant.

DTJFOUR, J.

In 1908, the plaintiff as alleged owner by the Auditor's deed of lots 5, 6 and 13 in square 1508 of the Third District of New Orleans, sued out a writ of possession.

Mr. and Mrs. Ibos, upon whom process was served by *345the Sheriff and who claimed to be owners, stayed the execution of the writ by injunction.

April 18, 1910.

Rehearing refused May 2, 1910.

In its answer to the petition of injunction the Realty Company changed its claim and instead of the original one, asserted title to Lots 2, 3, 5 and 13 of the same square.

It offered no deeds in evidence, made no attempt to clear the matter by testimony and merely presented two sketches, which contradict the assessment roll and the answer by showing different frontage of the property.

The plaintiff appears to content itself with the statement that the property it claims is not that claimed by Ibos and his wife.

If this be true, a settlement of the controversy appears to be easy.

It is abundantly shown that Mr. and Mrs. Ibos have been owners in undisputed possession for twenty-five years of all that part of Square 1508 which fronts on Bruxelles and Broad Street.

Both parties should be satisfied with a judgment which quiets the title of the Ibos claimants to that property, and which, at the same time, reserves the plaintiff’s rights, if any, to any other property in Square 1508.

Such do we understand the judgment to he.

Judgment affirmed.
July 28, 1975

The Honorable Kenneth W. Cook Administrator Alcoholic Beverage Commission P. 0. Box 13127, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 Dear Mr. Cook: Opinion No. H- 650 Re: Effect ofAdministrative

Procedure Act on subpoena power ofthe Alcoholic Beverage Commission.
You have requested our opinion concerning the effect ofthe Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act, Acts 1975, 64th Leg., ch. 61. p.136, on the subpoena power ofthe Alcoholic Beverage Commission. Article 666-7, Penal Auxiliary Laws, provides inpart: The Board. , . shall. . . have power toissue subpoenas. . . .

. . . ,Subpoenas shall be served . , . as in civil cases inthe District Court inthe county towhich such witness shall be called. Section 22 ofthe Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act provides inpart: This Act does not repeal any existing statutory

provisions conferring investigatory authority onany agency, including any provision which grants an agency the power, in connection with investigatory authority, to . . . issue subpoenas or summons. We have discovered noother provision ofthe Act which would affect the eubpoena power ofthe Alcoholic Beverage Commission. Accordingly, in our opinion the subpoena power provided inarticle 666-7 is unaffected bythe Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act.

p.2856The Honorable Kenneth W. Cook, page 2

SUMMARY The subpoena power ofthe Alcoholic Beverage Commission is not affected bythe Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act. Very truly yours, 

# u Attorney General ofTexas APPROVED:

DAVID M. KENDALL, First Assistant 

# 9
C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee

p. 2857
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement:

[to be published] 

# Status:

Closed Meeting. 

# Place:

100 F Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

# Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting:

June 19, 2009 at 11 a.m. 

# Change In the Meeting:

Deletion of an Item. 

The following item will not be considered during the Closed Meeting on Friday, June 19, 2009: Formal order of investigation. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: June 17, 2009. 

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-14656 Filed 6-22-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
# Science News About Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

NIH Researchers Identify Brain Connections Associated With ADHD in Youth
March 13, 2024                • Media Advisory

Researchers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have discovered that symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are tied to atypical interactions between the brain’s frontal cortex and information processing centers deep in the brain. 

The Ups and Downs of Bipolar Disorder
December 12, 2023                • Feature Story • 75th Anniversary

Josh Santana shares his story of growing up with ADHD and bipolar disorder.

Developing Rapid, Accurate Assessment of Mental Disorders, Suicide Risk in Youth
February 25, 2020                • Research Highlight

For many adults who have a mental disorder, symptoms were present—but often not recognized or addressed—in childhood and adolescence. Early treatment can help prevent more severe, lasting impairment or disability as a child grows up.

NIH Study Reveals Differences in Brain Activity in Children with Anhedonia
March 13, 2019                • Press Release

Researchers have identified changes in brain connectivity and brain activity during rest and reward anticipation in children with anhedonia, a condition where people lose interest and pleasure in activities they used to enjoy.

Understanding the Brain Mechanisms of Irritability in Youth
October 22, 2018                • Science Update

Researchers have identified differences in how the brains of irritable youth react to frustration, findings that could provide new paths for developing treatments for children and adolescents with severe irritability.

Inflammation in Pregnant Moms Linked to Child’s Brain Development
July 24, 2018                • Science Update

High levels of maternal inflammation during pregnancy have been linked to effects in children, including reduced brain circuit communications and altered long-distance brain wiring at birth, poorer cognitive function at one year – and to reduced impulse control and working memory at two years.

Estrogen Alters Memory Circuit Function in Women with Gene Variant
April 19, 2017                • Science Update

Brain scans reveal that fluctuations in estrogen can trigger atypical functioning in a key brain memory circuit in women with a common version of a gene. Since working memory function is often disturbed in mental disorders, such gene-hormone interactions are suspect mechanisms that may confer risk.

Distractible Mice Offer Clues to Attention Deficit
March 24, 2016                • Science Update

A recent NIMH-funded study sheds new light on how the brain’s processing of sensory information, a key impairment in autism and ADHD, can affect higher level cognitive functions, such as attention and decision making.
Exhibit 31(c)

CERTIFICATIONS

 
I, Hugh T. McDonald, certify that:  
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Entergy Arkansas, Inc.;  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:   
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   
b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;   
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

		/s/ Hugh T. McDonald
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40062

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROSALI MAURICIO RAMOS-SORTO, also known as Sorto Ramos-Mauricio,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-1569-1

Before BENAVIDES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rosali Mauricio Ramos-Sorto appealed the 46-month sentence imposed 

following his guilty plea conviction for being found in the United States after 

previous deportation. For the first time on appeal, he contends that the district 

court plainly erred in imposing a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. 

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) based on his 2001 District of Columbia conviction for 

distribution of a controlled substance in a drug-free zone because the statute 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-40062 Document: 00513112883 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2015
No. 14-40062

2

of conviction, District of Columbia Code §§ 33-541(a)(1), 33-547.1 (1999), does 

not require proof of commercial activity.

This argument is foreclosed by our recent holdings in United States v. 

Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 204-05 (5th Cir. 2015), and United States v. 

Rodriguez-Bernal, 783 F.3d 1002, 1003, 1008 (5th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, 

Ramos-Sorto has shown no clear or obvious error with regard to his sentence. 

See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009).

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 14-40062 Document: 00513112883 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/13/2015