alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 180 

Supporting the designation of March 2019 as National Colorectal Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2019 

Mr. PAYNE (for himself, Mr. RASKIN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. SOTO, 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. 

CLARKE of New York, Mr. COHEN, Ms. SLOTKIN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, 

Mr. MCEACHIN, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. RUSH, and Mr. HASTINGS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of March 2019 as National 

Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month. 

Whereas colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men and women combined in the United 

States; 

Whereas in 2019, more than 145,600 Americans will be diagnosed with colorectal cancer and approximately 51,000 

Americans will die from it; 

Whereas colorectal cancer is one of the most highly preventable forms of cancer because screening tests can find polyps that can be removed before becoming cancerous; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 180 IH 

Whereas screening tests can detect colorectal cancer early, 

when treatment works best; 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that if every individual aged 50 or older had regular screening tests, as many as 60 percent of deaths 

from colorectal cancer could be prevented; 

Whereas the 5-year survival rate for patients with localized 

colorectal cancer is 90 percent, but only 39 percent of all 

diagnoses occur at this stage; 

Whereas colorectal cancer screenings can effectively reduce 

colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, yet, 1 in 3 

adults over 50 years of age are not up to date with recommended colorectal cancer screening; 

Whereas public awareness and education campaigns on 

colorectal cancer prevention, screening, and symptoms 

are held during the month of March each year; and 

Whereas educational efforts can help provide information to 

the public of methods of prevention and screening, as 

well as about symptoms for early detection: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the month with appropriate awareness 

6 and educational activities. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information quarterly report on Form
10-QSB for the fiscal quarter is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
a
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,665,676
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,095,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             9,245,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 41,610,520
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    106,684,562
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,852,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             169,683,763
<DEPOSITS>                                 143,257,784
<SHORT-TERM>                                11,550,160
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            233,045
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,810,716
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,832,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             169,683,763
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,360,445
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              615,948
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                55,843
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,032,236
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,414,817
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,489,983
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,542,253
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  300,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               7,112
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,339,873
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 95,678
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      95,678
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (5,065)
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,743
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.14
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,455,657
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,151,387
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,802,773
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  288,460
<RECOVERIES>                                    38,567
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,852,880
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,852,880
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at September 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and
the Statement of Income for the three months ended September 30, 1997
(Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             472
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,972
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,376
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   (1,241,015)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,972
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (807)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (807)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (807)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Jazmine Weisman et al., Appellants, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

Submitted May 14, 2012;

decided June 26, 2012

Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DASHAWN L. SMITH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 785 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies,
Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Durando, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronald A.
DurandoRonald A. Durando Chief Executive Officer

May 17, 2010

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Se ptember 18, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00463

- CR

Michael Lee HERNDON, Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR13361

The Honorable Jennifer Pena , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court clerk has forwarded the appellant’s notice of appeal and the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(e).

The certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. We

therefore ORDER the trial court clerk to file, by September 28, 2020 a clerk’s record containing the following documents:

1. All pre

- trial motions and the orders on those motions, if

a ny; 2. all documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain, including the court’s admonishments, the defendant’s waiver and consent to stipulation of testimony, and any other stipulations;

3. the judgment;

4. all post

-

judgment motions and the orders on those motions, if any;

5. the notice(s) of appeal;

6. the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal;

7. the criminal docket sheet; and

8. the bill of costs.

After the c lerk’s record has been filed, this court will review the

certification to determine whether it is defective. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding court of appeals must review clerk’s record

to determine whether the certificati on is defective).We further ORDER that appellant is hereby notified that if the clerk’s

record or a supplemental clerk’s record filed with this court does not contain a certification or amended certification showing appellant has the right of appeal, and if the trial court’s certification is not defective, this appeal will be dismissed within 30 days of this order un less appellant shows cause why this appeal

should not be dismissed. See id. R. 25.2(d), (f) (requiring “dismiss[al] if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record” and providing an amended certifica tion may be filed in the appellate court under Rule 37.1 or any time before the appellant’s brief is filed).

We further ORDER that all other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further

order of this court. We also ORDER the clerk of this court to s end a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on thi s 18th day of September, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40698

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAVIER GARZA-FLORES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:14-CR-39-1

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The July 3, 2019 opinion was issued in error. It is WITHDRAWN and 

the following is SUBSTITUTED in its place:

Javier Garza-Flores pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation in 

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b), and was sentenced below the advisory 

guidelines range to 54 months of imprisonment and no term of supervised 

release. Garza-Flores was released from custody on April 16, 2018.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 8, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40698 Document: 00515025589 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/08/2019
No. 16-40698

2

“The question of whether an appeal is moot is jurisdictional.” United 

States v. Villanueva-Diaz, 634 F.3d 844, 848 (5th Cir. 2011). “In criminal 

cases . . . a defendant wishing to continue his appeals after the expiration of 

his sentence must suffer some ‘continuing injury’ or ‘collateral consequence’ 

sufficient to satisfy Article III.” United States v. Juvenile Male, 564 U.S. 932, 

936 (2011). Where the defendant has challenged only his expired sentence, he 

has “the burden of identifying some ongoing collateral consequence that is 

traceable to the challenged portion of the sentence and likely to be redressed 

by a favorable judicial decision.” Id. (internal quotation marks, modification, 

and citation omitted).

As Garza-Flores has been released from prison, was not sentenced to a 

term of supervised release, challenges only his sentence on appeal, and fails to 

identify any ongoing collateral consequence, his appeal is DISMISSED AS 

MOOT.

 Case: 16-40698 Document: 00515025589 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/08/2019
#     All Disorders  

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPRSTVWZ
View All

## C

CADASIL

Canavan Disease

Central Cord Syndrome

Central Pain Syndrome

Central Pontine Myelinolysis

Cerebellar Degeneration

Cerebellar Hypoplasia

Cerebral Aneurysms

Cerebral Arteriosclerosis

Cerebral Cavernous Malformations

Cerebral Palsy

Cerebro-Oculo-Fascio-Skeletal (COFS) Syndrome

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Chiari Malformations

Coffin-Lowry Syndrome

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Congenital Myasthenia

Congenital Myopathy

Corticobasal Degeneration

Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease

Cushing's Syndrome

Cytomegalovirus, Neurological Consequences of
#### BRIGHTWATER PAPER CO. v. MONADNOCK PAPER MILLS.

Civ. A. No. 1712.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Oct. 8, 1942.

*548Damon E. Hall, Philip N. Jones (of Hurlburt, Jones, Hall & Bickford), all of Boston, Mass., and Walter J. Donovan, of Adams, Mass., for plaintiff.

William B. Sleigh, Jr., of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

SWEENEY, District Judge.

In this case the defendant has propounded eleven pages of interrogatories to the plaintiff, seeking much detailed information. Annexed to the plaintiff’s declaration are more than one hundred detailed exhibits, and it is toward the items entered in these annexed exhibits that the interrogatories are directed. To require the answers to all of the interrogatories filed would compel the adverse party to examine closely into many hundreds of items. The interrogatories themselves have many subdivisions, and would be violative of Chapter 231, Section 61 of the Annotated Laws of Massachusetts which limits interrogatories to thirty, including subdivisions. While this court does not adopt the Massachusetts statute as its criterion, it is pointed to as a sensible guide for would be interrogators.

The objections filed by the plaintiff are sustained on the broad ground that the use of interrogatories cannot be permitted where the information sought results in a vexatious and harassing burden to the adverse party.

The plaintiff has likewise offended with a group of fifty-five interrogatories, many of which have numerous subdivisions. The objections to these interrogatories are sustained on the same ground referred to above.

The information sought to be elicited by each party can be obtained, if relevant, through the use of oral depositions.

See Checker Cab Manufacturing Corporation v. Checker Taxi Company and Frank Sawyer, 2 F.R.D. 547, decided this date.
#     All Disorders  

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPRSTVWZ
View All

## D

Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders

Dementia, Multi-Infarct

Dementias

Dermatomyositis

Developmental Dyspraxia

Dravet Syndrome

Dyssynergia Cerebellaris Myoclonica
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 244 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 244

     Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on House 
         Administration in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 2019

 Ms. Lofgren submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on House 
         Administration in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on House Administration 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $10,644,422 for the One 
Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,172,211 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2019, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2020; and
            (2) not more than $5,472,211 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2020, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2021.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the chair of the Committee, and approved in 
the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Good Times Restaurants Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Boyd E. Hoback, Chief Executive Officer and Susan M. Knutson, Controller of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Boyd E. Hoback

Boyd E. Hoback

Chief Executive Officer

February 13, 2006

/s/ Susan M. Knutson

Susan M. Knutson

Controller (principal financial officer)

February 13, 2006
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 12 OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on March 4, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

The State of Texas, Appellant(s)

V.

John D. Deloach, Appellee(s)

No. 04-14-00324-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 130556

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we WITHDRAW our

opinion and judgment dated November 19, 2014, we REVERSE the county

court at law’s judgment, and we RENDER judgment reinstating the municipal

court’sjudgment.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on July 10, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853