alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary W.
Miller, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ GARY W. MILLER
-------------------------
Gary W. Miller
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
March 14, 2006
#### Joel Vig, Appellant, v New York Hairspray Co., L.P., Respondent.

Submitted July 30, 2012;

decided September 6, 2012

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*19 NY3d 807 (2012)].
Exhibit 32.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Michael D. Dale, Chief Executive Officer of ATS Medical, Inc., certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that:
The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: May 10, 2004    /s/ Michael D. Dale     Name: Michael D. DaleTitle: Chief Executive Officer
ACTIV Database & Inventory Effort

ACTIV Public-Private Partnership

Co-Chairs

• Larry Tabak, NIH

• William Pao, Roche

Members

• Gary Disbrow, BARDA

• Mikael Dolsten, Pfizer

• Anthony Fauci, NIH

• Gary Gibbons, NIH

• Peter Marks, FDA

• Gary Dubin,Takeda

• Janet Woodcock, FDA

• Vaccines Clinical 

Trials

• Protective Immune 

Responses

• Vaccine-Associated 

Immune Enhancement

• Impact of Vaccines on 

Transmission

• Correlates of 

Protection

• Survey Development

• Clinical Trial Network Inventory

• Design Innovations

Clinical Trial Capacity Working Group

• Agent Prioritization

• Master Protocol

Therapeutics Clinical Working Group

• Animal Models

• In VitroAssays

• Mutation Tracking

 Preclinical Working Group

ACTIV Partnership

Leadership Group

ACTIV Executive Committee

 Vaccines Working Group TRACE Working Group

• Variant emergence 

monitoring

• Resistance testing

• Data sharing
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7014

BRANDON ROBERTS,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

and

RANDY GOLDEN; AUGUSTUS WOODARD; JOHN ARTIS,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(8:13-cv-01528-RDB)

Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: January 8, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brandon Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his motion for discovery in this action filed 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Roberts

seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES v. PRIVINZINI.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Sept. 24, 1946.

John F. X. McGohey, of New York City, U. S. Atty., for Southern District of N. Y. (William M. Regan, of New York City, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel), for United States.

Henry K. Chapman, of New York City, for defendant-movant.

MANDELFAUM, District Judge.

I have granted reargument for the purpose of clarifying my decision of May 24, 1946 in which I was called upon to decide whether or not an affidavit is required in support of a motion made by a defendant to suppress evidence. I held that under Rule 47 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure the submission of an affidavit was optional with the moving party.

The government now urges upon me that there is an implication in that decision that under the new criminal rules the court has been divested of discretionary power to direct the submission of an affidavit in any case. I have accordingly reviewed the entire matter and affirmatively state that I do not so hold. Courts have always had discretion to direct the submission of affidavits to aid it in the disposition of motions and still continue to do so. Under Rule 47 the moving party may or may not submit an affidavit in support of its application but clearly the court may direct that such affidavit be submitted by the moving party if it finds it necessary to have one.

In the instant motion the government further urges that if the court finds that it still retains discretion to order the submission of an affidavit, it should exercise such discretion in favor of the government and direct the defendant to do so.

I have decided to direct the submission of an affidavit for the following reason. The motion is one to suppress evidence on the ground that the search and seizure was made without first obtaining a warrant, and as claimed by the defendant, against his will. While a hearing is ordinarily required in such matters, the submission of an affidavit by the defendant in this case may obviate such a hearing. Whether a court will require affidavits in other instances is not before me and must be decided as each situation arises.

Accordingly, my opinion of May 24, 1946 is recalled and defendant is hereby directed to furnish an affidavit in support of his motion to suppress.
EXHIBIT 10.10

 

Description of Director Compensation

 

Directors who are employees of YuMe, Inc. (“YuMe”) do not receive compensation from YuMe for the services they provide as directors.  Each non-employee member of the board of directors will be eligible to receive compensation for his or her service consisting of annual cash retainers and equity awards as follows:

 

	
Position
    	
 
    	
Retainer
    	
 
    
	
Board Member
    	
 
    	
$
    	
30,000
    	
 
    
	
Audit Committee Chair
    	
 
    	
15,000
    	
 
    
	
Compensation Committee Chair
    	
 
    	
10,000
    	
 
    
	
Nominating and Governance Committee Chair
    	
 
    	
5,000
    	
 
    
	
Audit Committee Member
    	
 
    	
7,500
    	
 
    
	
Compensation Committee Member
    	
 
    	
5,000
    	
 
    
	
Nominating and Governance Committee Member
    	
 
    	
2,500
    	
 
    
					


 

Equity awards will consist of an initial stock option grant, upon first appointment to our board of directors, with a Black-Scholes value of $125,000, and annual awards at each meeting of the stockholders thereafter with a Black-Scholes value of $70,000. Such options will be granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of YuMe’s common stock on the date of grant and vest over three years after the grant date (for initial grants) or one year after the grant date (for annual grants).
---



Exhibit 32.1



MPHASE TECHNOLGIES, INC.



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Durando, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, I all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ronald A. Durando



Ronald A. Durando

Chief Executive Officer



November 13, 2006

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000854062
<NAME> GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD. PARTNERSHIP II-H
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         177,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  187,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               364,863
<PP&E>                                       6,177,296
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,935,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,644,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,718
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,601,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,644,951
<SALES>                                        861,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               945,460
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,223,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (278,292)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (278,292)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (278,292)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### ANDERSON v. KENOSHA AUTO TRANSP. Inc., et al.

Civ. No. 745.

District Court, D. Minnesota, Fifth Division.

Nov. 7, 1946.

Meagher & Geer, of Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiffs.

Freeman and King, of Minneapolis, Minn., and Hunt, Palmer & Hood, of Duluth, Minn., for defendant in support of said motion.

Abbott, MacPherran, Dancer & Montague, and Harry C. Applequist, all of Duluth, Minn., for the said Hilmer Carlson, in opposition to said motion.

DONOVAN, District Judge.

The reasons for the ruling in this case are the same as set forth in the Memorandum in the case of Anderson v. Kenosha Auto Transport, Inc., 6 F.R.D. 265.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of


Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Richard Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of Spherix Incorporated (the “Company”), in compliance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:





·Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





·The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard Cohen

Richard Cohen

Chief Financial Officer

April 9, 2014





A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Spherix Incorporated and will be retained by Spherix Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of

INDEPENDENT BANCSHARES, INC.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Independent BancShares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report), I, Mark A. Imes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and I, Dennis M. Clarke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          |  |                                                    
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dennis M. Clarke                      |  | /s/ Mark A. Imes                                   
|Dennis M. Clarke, Chief Financial Officer |  | Mark A. Imes, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                          | 
|Date: May 11, 2007                        |  | Date: May 11, 2007
*Monday, April 28, 1997*

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

96-2078.

#### Scancarello v. Erie Ins. Co.

Franklin App. No. 96APE02-166.

This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000842881
<NAME>                         GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP II-E

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                            436,558
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     451,396
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  887,954
<PP&E>                         14,869,831
<DEPRECIATION>                 12,987,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,986,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              71,578
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                      2,872,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,986,827
<SALES>                         1,170,440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,185,489
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     582,187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   603,302
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               603,302
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      603,302
<EPS-BASIC>                          2.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0



</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<LEGEND> THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CORPORATIONS FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

      <MULTIPLIER> 1

      <S>                           <C>
      <PERIOD-TYPE>                     QUARTER
      <FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
      <PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-2000
      <CASH>                             16,352
      <SECURITIES>                        2,000
      <RECEIVABLES>                           0
      <ALLOWANCES>                            0
      <INVENTORY>                     1,450,000
      <CURRENT ASSETS>                        0
      <PP&E>                                  0
      <DEPRECIATION>                          0
      <TOTAL ASSETS>                  1,468,352
      <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,095,117
      <BONDS>                                 0
      <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
      <PREFERRED>                             0
      <COMMON>                            2,404
      <OTHER-SE>                        370,831
      <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,468,352
      <SALES>                                 0
      <TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
      <CGS>                                   0
      <TOTAL COSTS>                           0
      <OTHER EXPENSES>                   30,300
      <LOSS PROVISION>                        0
      <INTEREST EXPENSE>                 14,400
      <INCOME PRETAX>                   (44,700)
      <INCOME-TAX>                            0
      <INCOME CONTINUING>                     0
      <DISCONTINUED>                          0
      <EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
      <CHANGES>                               0
      <NET-INCOME>                      (44,700)
      <EPS-BASIC>                       (.002)
      <EPS-DILUTED>                       (.002)
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated July 16, 2013, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-188081) of Smart Trust, Strategic
Growth & Income Trust, Series 3.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


July 16, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             967
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                       175
<INVENTORY>                                     18,478
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,466
<PP&E>                                          36,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,619
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,523
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,905
<SALES>                                         86,027
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,027
<CGS>                                           66,337
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,677
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    66
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,163
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,347
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,816
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,816
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of China Granite Corporation, a Nevada
      Corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December
      31,
      2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), Dong Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies
      to
      the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Granite Corporation, and will be retained by China Granite Corporation
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.








/s/
      Dong Chen


Dong
      Chen


Chief
      Executive Officer


February
      8, 2006