alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SYBRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           9,763
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  245,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,828
<INVENTORY>                                    228,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               529,455
<PP&E>                                         252,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                 232,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,976,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          162,350
<BONDS>                                        969,923
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,044
<OTHER-SE>                                     688,461
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,976,586
<SALES>                                        624,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               624,636
<CGS>                                          299,571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (377)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                114,654
<INCOME-TAX>                                    45,255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             69,399
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    69,399
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65


</TABLE>
# GREAT: Helpful Practices to Manage Stress and Anxiety

February 22, 2021

## Transcript

GREAT: Helpful Practices to Manage Stress and Anxietywww.nimh.nih.gov/stressandanxietyGREAT was developed by Dr. Krystal Lewis, a licensed clinical psychologist at NIMH.GratitudeRelaxationExerciseAcknowledge feelingsTrack thoughtsBe GREAT
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #15-2006 (B) L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and


(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





By:
/s/ Matthew A. JonesName:
Matthew A. JonesTitle:
Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
August 13, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 10, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 27455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 90

[WP Docket No. 07-100; FCC 09-29]


Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission is correcting a final 
rule that appeared in the Federal Register of May 21, 2009, 74 FR 
23799. The document issued a measurement procedure for the maximum 
conducted output power of radio equipment used in the 4.9 GHz frequency 
band.

DATES: Effective June 22, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Eng, Policy Division, Public 
Safety and Homeland Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 
Washington, DC 20554, at (202) 418-0019, TTY (202) 418-7233, via e-mail 
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#24704c4b4945570a614a43644247470a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fca89493919d8fd2b9929bbc9a9f9fd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>, or via U.S. Mail at Federal Communications 
Commission, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, 445 12th 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Communications Commission 
published a document in the Federal Register on May 21, 2009, 74 FR 
23799, inadvertently omitting the words ``using instrumentation.'' This 
correction is necessary for clarification. In rule FR Doc. E9-11908 
published May 21, 2009, 74 FR 23799 make the following correction:


Sec.  90.1215  [Corrected]

0
On page 23803, in the third column, in Sec.  90.1215 Power Limits, in 
paragraph (c), the first sentence, ``The maximum conducted output power 
is measured as a conducted emission over any interval of continuous 
transmission calibrated in terms of an RMS-equivalent voltage.'' is 
corrected to read ``The maximum conducted output power is measured as a 
conducted emission over any interval of continuous transmission using 
instrumentation calibrated in terms of an RMS-equivalent voltage.''

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13665 Filed 6-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
For Immediate Release Media Contact: Mark Gaston 

 (202) 632-7003 

2013 Indian Gaming Revenues Increased 0.5% 

Washington, DC July 21, 2014 —Today the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC 

or Commission) released data showing revenues generated by the Indian gaming 

industry in 2013 totaled $28 billion. 

 

“In 2013, the Indian gaming industry saw the growth of its gross gaming revenues for the 

fourth consecutive year,” said Jonodev Chaudhuri, Vice Chairman of the NIGC. “This 

stable, positive trajectory underscores the ongoing significance of Indian gaming to larger 

tribal nation building and self-determination efforts.” 

The 2013 Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR) is calculated on the 449 independently 

audited financial statements submitted by 235 gaming tribes. The 2013 GGR of $28 

billion represents a 0.5% growth in revenue as compared to 2012 reported GGR of 

$27.9 billion. Overall Indian gaming revenues stabilized over the past four years. 

Associate Commissioner Daniel Little said, “Indian Gaming topped $28B for the first 

time since the passage of IGRA. It's a testament to the trust the gaming public has 

placed on this industry and it reinforces the fact that this industry has the most 

comprehensive regulatory structure in the business”.

The table below shows the revenues trend over the past 10 years. Revenue numbers 

are in billions. 

The Indian gaming community primarily consists of tribes generating much needed 

revenue each year through small and moderate gaming operations. In 2013, 56% of 

Indian gaming operations reported gaming revenue less than $25 million. 157 of these 

operations generated gaming revenue less than $10 million. 
The map shown above illustrates the seven NIGC regions across the country. For 2013, 

all regions experienced growth with the exception of St. Paul region. The largest growth 

in GGR occurred within the Oklahoma City Region, which includes 60 gaming operations in 

western Oklahoma and Texas. 

Portland Sacramento Phoenix St. Paul Tulsa Washington 

DC OK City 

Revenue calculations are based on the independent audit reports NIGC receives 

annually from tribes conducting gaming operations in accordance with IGRA. The 2013 

GGR information was compiled from Indian gaming operations audited financial 

statements received by the NIGC through June 27, 2014. Gaming revenues represent 
the net win from gaming activities which is the difference between gaming receipts and 

payouts. 

Additional charts and graphs can be found on the NIGC website, www.nigc.gov. 

The NIGC is an independent regulatory agency established within the Department of the Interior pursuant to the 

Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. 

###
**EXHIBIT 24**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

        We,the undersigned Directors and Officers of The Black & Decker Corporation (the“Corporation”), hereby constitute and appoint Nolan D. Archibald, Michael D.Mangan and Charles E. Fenton, and each of them, with power of substitution, our trueand lawful attorneys-in-fact with full power to sign for us, in our names and in thecapacities indicated below, the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2005, and any and all amendments thereto.
#### PITMAN v. FLORIDA CITRUS EXCHANGE.

District Court, S„ D„ New York.

June 7, 1941.

Martin Van Blarcom, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Henry Weinberger, of New York City, for defendant.

KNOX, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s motion, asking that paragraphs 14, 15 and 16 of the amended answer — constituting defendant’s counterclaim — be stricken, will be granted.

The amended answers to plaintiff’s interrogatories fail to comply with the conditions stated in the first directory paragraph of my order of May 2, 1941, in that they fail to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 33, 28 U. S.C.A. following section 723c, to the effect that “Any party may serve upon any adverse party written interrogatories to be answered by the party served or, if the party served is a * * * private corporation * * * , *by any officer thereof competent to testify in its*behalf(Italics mine.)

In this case, the interrogatories have been answered and verified by the attorney for defendant. This is not sufficient.

The amended answers further are insufficient in that they fail to substantiate the said paragraphs of the amended answer.

Accordingly, the penalty provisions of my order of May 2 become operative.
Motions Denied; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 9, 

2015 .

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00197-CV

____________

DAVID E. JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 344th District Court

Chambers County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV28790

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed March 2, 2015. No clerk’s record has 

been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed 

the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On May 19, 2015, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, 

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court 
2

with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered DISMISSED.

Appellant’s motion to dismiss and motion to withdraw his motion to dismiss 

are DENIED AS MOOT.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, McCally, and Donovan
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C
SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of China Tel Group, Inc. and its Subsidiaries (“Company”), on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Untied States Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Carlos A. Trujillo, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








By: /s/
Carlos A. Trujillo


Carlos A.
Trujillo


Chief
Financial Officer


May 20,
2009





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Tel Group, Inc. and will be retained by China Tel Group, Inc. and
furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.]
H. Res. 1 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 3, 2019. 

Resolved, That Karen L. Haas of the State of Maryland, 

be, and is hereby, chosen Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Resolved, That Paul D. Irving of the State of Florida be, 

and is hereby, chosen Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Representatives. 

Resolved, That Philip George Kiko of the State of Ohio 

be, and is hereby, chosen Chief Administrative Officer of the 

House of Representatives. 

Resolved, That Father Patrick J. Conroy of the State of 

Oregon be, and is hereby, chosen Chaplain of the House of 

Representatives. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION IN THE 

OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS 

OF MARYLAND 

Petitioner, 

Misc. Docket AG No. 03 

V. 

September Term, 2015 

WALTER H. IULLIAN 

Respondent. 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to 

Maryland Rule 16-722, in which Respondent admits he committed professional misconduct in 

violation of Rule 1.15(d) and 8.4 (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct, and 

the record herein, it is this Etb day of July, 2015, 

ORDERED, that Respondent, Walter H. Killian, be and he is hereby disbarred from the 

practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further 

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Walter H. Killian from the 

register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of 

the Bar of Maryland and all clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland 

Rule 16-772(d). 

/s/ Lynne A. Battaglia 

Senior Judge
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30045-30046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14758]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Georgia Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Georgia Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will 
convene at 1:30 p.m. and adjourn at 3:30 p.m. on Wednesday, July 15, 
2009, at the Barnes Law Group, 31 Atlanta Street, Marietta, Georgia 
30060. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the Committee's report 
on fair housing enforcement in Georgia and discuss the Committee's 
activity plan for fiscal year 2010.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
address is 61 Forsyth St., SW., Suite 18T40, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. 
Persons wishing

[[Page 30046]]

to e-mail their comments, present their comments at the meeting, or who 
desire additional information should contact Dr. Peter Minarik, 
Regional Director, at (404) 562-7000 or 800-877-8339 for individuals 
who are deaf, hearing impaired, and/or have speech disabilities or by 
e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bdcdd0d4d3dccfd4d6fdc8cededecf93dad2cb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e1918c888f8093888aa19492828293cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Southern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, June 18, 2009.
Martin Dannenfelser,
Staff Director.
[FR Doc. E9-14758 Filed 6-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 2-96104, 33-13278, 33-27498, 33-45699, 33-58340, 33-50395,
33-51615 and 33-65301, and Form S-8 Nos. 2-67517, 2-97972, 33-20693, 33-21564,
33-41014, 33-52329 and 33-54971) and in the related Prospectuses of Bankers
Trust New York Corporation of our report dated January 25, 1996, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Bankers Trust New York Corporation
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1995.

                                                           /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                           ---------------------
                                                               Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 7, 1996

138  BANKERS TRUST NEW YORK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,Ronald A. Durando, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C.Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

 

1.          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

February22, 2016

 

 

 

.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Pearson, Appellant.

Submitted March 4, 2013;

decided April 25, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain the motion from the order of the Appellate Term *(see*CPLR 5602 [a]).
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CF JORDAN CONSTRUCTION, 

L.L.C.,

APPELLANT,

V.

LAZARO LOZANO,

APPELLEE.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00127-CV

Appeal from the

205th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2013-DCV-1847)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is the joint motion of Appellant, CF Jordan Construction, 

L.L.C., and Appellee, Lazaro Lozano, to dismiss the appeal with prejudice. See TEX.R.APP.P.

42.1(a)(2). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal with prejudice. In accordance with the 

parties’ agreement, costs of the appeal are taxed against the party incurring same. See

TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d)(“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the 

appellant.”).

July 10, 2015

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6196

DAVIS YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; M. WHIPPLE, Captain; RONALD JACQUES, Major; P. DOUGLAS TAYLOR, Warden; MARGARET HARRISON, DHO; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE, all sued in their individual capacities; BERNICE SMITH, Sergeant; ARON BROWN, Sergeant; T. ALEXANDER, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-3778-6-12AK) Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Davis Young, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, Francesca Macchiaverna, LAW OFFICE OF DUFFIE STONE, Bluffton, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Davis Young appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. Appellant’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6588

ALEXANDER CAMERON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusJ. BOONE, Unit Manager; MS. ROBERTS, Counselor; MS. MACER, Counselor, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-962-AM) Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Alexander Cameron, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Cameron Alexander, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cameron v. Boone , No. CA-99-962-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 6, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED