alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 373 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 373

    Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Move Over Law Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2019

Mr. Biggs submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Move Over Law Day.

Whereas the House of Representatives wishes to recognize tow truck operators (as 
        defined by the Federal Highway Workers Association Manual of Uniform 
        Traffic Control Devices) as private sector responders;
Whereas due to the increasingly high rate of distracted drivers on the roadway, 
        many towing operators lose their lives while performing their duties 
        each year;
Whereas nationally in 2018 the towing industry lost 21 towers, of which it is 
        aware, to roadside collisions;
Whereas every State has a ``move over'' law, which has correlated directly to a 
        safer environment along our Nation's roadsides for towers, law 
        enforcement, first responders, and stranded citizens;
Whereas these laws generally require motorists to move at least one lane over 
        when there is an emergency or rescue activity taking place on the 
        shoulder or side of the roadway; or, if unable to do so safely, to 
        alternatively slow down and pass the scene with caution; and
Whereas providing the towing industry and law enforcement an enhanced 
        opportunity to inform the motoring public about these laws is critical 
        to the public safety: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of a National Move Over 
        Law Day;
            (2) urges the national incident management organizations, 
        as well as State and regional incident management 
        organizations, to spread awareness and promote the existence 
        of, and adherence to, State move over laws; and
            (3) urges the national incident management organizations, 
        and similar State and regional incident management 
        organizations, to further educate the public on the dangers and 
        loss of life if the provisions and requirements of State move 
        over laws are not faithfully observed.
                                 <all>
```
# Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia

## What is hereditary spastic paraplegia?

Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP), also known as familial spastic paraparesis, refers to a group of inherited disorders that involves weakness and spasticity, which is stiffness of the legs. These symptoms get worse over time. Early in the disease, there may be mild trouble walking and stiffness. These symptoms typically get worse slowly until a cane, walker, or wheelchair is needed. 

The progressive lower limb spasticity and weakness are the main features of “pure” HSP. Complicated forms of HSP may include other symptoms:
              - Impaired vision due to cataracts and problems with the optic nerve and retina of the eye
              - Ataxia, which is a lack of muscle coordination
              - Epilepsy
              - Cognitive impairment
              - Peripheral neuropathy, damage to the nerves outside of the brain and spinal cord
              - Deafness

HSP is diagnosed mainly by neurological exam and testing to rule out other disorders. 

Several genetic mutations have been identified that are linked to various forms of HSP, and specialized genetic testing and diagnosis are available at some medical centers.  HSP has several forms of inheritance. Not all children in a family will necessarily develop symptoms, but they may be carriers of the abnormal gene. Depending on the HSP gene involved, symptoms may begin in childhood or adulthood.

There are no treatments to prevent, slow, or reverse HSP. Treatments such as muscle relaxers can sometimes relieve spasticity. Regular physical therapy is important for muscle strength and to keep range of motion.

The outlook for people with HSP varies. Some people are significantly limited and others have only mild disability. Most people with pure HSP have a normal life expectancy.

file-medical

## How can I or my loved one help improve care for people with hereditary spastic paraplegia?

Consider participating in a clinical trial so clinicians and scientists can learn more about HSP and related disorders. Clinical research uses human volunteers to help researchers learn more about a disorder and perhaps find better ways to safely detect, treat, or prevent disease. 

All types of volunteers are needed—those who are healthy or may have an illness or disease—of all different ages, sexes, races, and ethnicities to ensure that study results apply to as many people as possible, and that treatments will be safe and effective for everyone who will use them. 

For information about participating in clinical research visit NIH Clinical Research Trials and You. Learn about clinical trials currently looking for people with HSP at Clinicaltrials.gov.
> Where can I find more information about hereditary spastic paraplegia?
The following organizations and resources can help individuals, families, friends, and caregivers of people living with HSP:

Genetic AlliancePhone: 202-966-5557 or 800-336-4363

The Lilly Blair FoundationPhone: 717-574-1348

National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD)Phone: 203-744-0100 or 800-999-6673; 844-259-7178 Spanish

Spastic Paraplegia FoundationPhone: 877-773-4483

book-open
[984 NE2d 923, 960 NYS2d 725]

#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Shenendehowa Central School District Board of Education, Appellant, and Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Local 864, et al., Respondents.

Argued January 3, 2013;

decided February 12, 2013

*1027APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Whiteman Osterman & Hanna LLP,*Albany *(Beth A. Bourassa*of counsel), for appellant.

*Daren J. Rylewicz,*Albany, for respondents.

*Jay Worona,*Latham, *Kimberly A. Fanniff*and *Jacinda H. Conboy*for New York State School Boards Association, and another, amici curiae.

*Michael E. Bergeron,*Latham, and *Richard E. Casagrande*for New York State United Teachers, amicus curiae.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Grievant school bus driver, in her tenth year of employment, tested positive for marijuana after a random drug test. As a result, the School District terminated her employment and respondent union filed a grievance on her behalf. The parties agreed to arbitrate whether grievant’s termination was a violation of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement and, if so, the appropriate remedy. The arbitrator concluded that the School District had violated the agreement and that the penalty of discharge was too severe. He then directed the School District to reinstate grievant without back pay,* subject to certain conditions, including evaluation by a substance abuse professional and a negative drug test. The School District commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511, seeking to vacate the portion of the arbitration award directing reinstatement and to modify the award by imposing the penalty of termination.

We have recognized “three narrow grounds that may form the basis for vacating an arbitrator’s award—that it violates public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator’s power” *(Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v Transport Workers Union of Am., Local 100,*14 NY3d 119, 123 [2010] [citations and internal quotation marks omitted]). None of these grounds has been established here.

The arbitrator’s decision did not exceed a specific limitation on his power; nor was it irrational. Rather, he determined that, contrary to the School District’s argument, the parties’ agreement *1028did not require the penalty of termination in these circumstances and that the District did not in fact have a zero tolerance policy. The consequent determination that reinstatement with conditions was the appropriate penalty did not violate public policy *(see Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v Mine Workers,*531 US 57 [2000]). “That reasonable minds might disagree over what the proper penalty should have been does not provide a basis for vacating the arbitral award or refashioning the penalty” *(City School Dist. of the City of N.Y. v McGraham,*17 NY3d 917, 920 [2011]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur; Judge Rivera taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

*

 This effectively imposed, at that time, a six-month unpaid suspension.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DONAVON RAY NICHOLS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-21, CA-96-41-3) Submitted: January 9, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1997 Before HALL and MI CHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donavon Ray Nichols, A ppellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Farrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nichols , Nos. CR-94-21; CA-96-41-3 (S.D.W. Va. May 20, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counseland dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Appellant, v Jason S. Conn et al., Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 467]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a motor vehicle lease, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Burke, J.), dated July 11, 2005, which denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“[T]he proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact” *(Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; *see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Failure to make such a showing requires denial of the motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., supra).*We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate prima facie its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Rentz v Modell,*262 AD2d 545, 546 [1999]). Adams, J.E, Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 439 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 439

  Maintaining North Korea's seizure of the vessel USS Pueblo and its 
   detention of the crew were in violation of international law and 
       seeking the return of the USS Pueblo to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2019

 Mr. Steube submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Maintaining North Korea's seizure of the vessel USS Pueblo and its 
   detention of the crew were in violation of international law and 
       seeking the return of the USS Pueblo to the United States.

Whereas the USS Pueblo is a commissioned ship of the United States Navy captured 
        by North Korea on January 23, 1968;
Whereas the USS Pueblo carried three 50-caliber machine guns and were not fired 
        when the USS Pueblo was being seized by North Korean patrol boats and 
        engaged in no hostilities against anyone, including North Korea;
Whereas the United States has made clear that the USS Pueblo was on an 
        intelligence collection mission in the Sea of Japan at the time of its 
        seizure by North Korea;
Whereas intelligence collection by vessels of this type is a standard and 
        accepted practice in the world today;
Whereas the USS Pueblo was engaged in a mission that is accepted by the navies 
        and governments of the world;
Whereas the USS Pueblo had strict orders to remain at all times at a distance 
        more than 13 nautical miles from the nearest point in North Korean 
        territory, in order to avoid any possible incident. The United States 
        has no reason to believe the orders were not obeyed;
Whereas even in the case of a warship that has entered territorial waters, the 
        coastal state is not entitled to assert any jurisdiction over it other 
        than to require the warship to leave the territorial sea if the warship 
        does not comply with regulations of the coastal state concerning passage 
        through the territorial sea and disregards a request for compliance;
Whereas the United States contends international law gives no such right to 
        seize a foreign war vessel within the territorial waters of North Korea; 
        and
Whereas all evidence shows that the USS Pueblo was on the high seas: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) maintains North Korea's seizure of the vessel USS 
        Pueblo and its detention of the crew were in violation of 
        international law; and
            (2) declares that USS Pueblo is the property of the United 
        States Government and it should be returned to the United 
        States.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 118 (Monday, June 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29485-29486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14582]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 7, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. B. Dirk Bagenstos and Lesley D. Bagenstos, both of Cherokee, 
Oklahoma; to acquire voting shares of First Keyes Bancshares, Inc., and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The First State Bank, both 
of Keyes, Oklahoma.


[[Page 29486]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 17, 2009.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-14582 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 10.1

​
One Church Street
Suite 201
Rockville, MD  20850
301-315-0027
fax 301-315-0064
www.arganinc.com
​
​
August 16, 2022
To the Board of Directors of Argan, Inc.
I hereby elect to retire as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Argan, Inc. (“Argan”), as a member of the Boards of Directors of each of Argan’s subsidiaries and from each position as an officer of Argan and each of its subsidiaries, in each case effective as of the date hereof. Accordingly, my Employment Agreement is hereby terminated. 
This election is being made upon the conditions that (i) I shall be entitled for a period of 36 months to the continuation of monthly payments and all benefits, as provided for in Section 4(a) and Section 5 of my Employment Agreement (in lieu of any fees for serving as a director), respectively, excluding sick and vacation time, (ii) I shall continue to use my current office in the Rockville headquarters of Argan for that period, and (iii) I shall be entitled to enter into any activities that may be deemed in competition with Argan, provided, however, that if I do enter into such competitive activities, I will immediately resign from the Board of Directors of Argan and will no longer be able to maintain an office at Argan.
​
​
	

	


		
	 
	/s/ Rainer Bosselmann

	 
	Rainer Bosselmann



​
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00213-CR

Joseph Alan Neeley

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1338837D)

July 9, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
EXHIBIT 24

 

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

     The undersigned directors of Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (the "Company"), each hereby constitutes and appoints Ronald L. Zarrella and Robert B. Stiles, or either of them, his or her respective true and lawful attorneys and agents, each with full power and authority to act as such without the other, to sign for and on behalf of the undersigned the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2003, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and the related rules and regulations thereunder, and any amendment or amendments thereto, the undersigned hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys and agents, or either one of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed by the undersigned as of this 24th day of February 2004.
DENY; and Opinion Filed September 16, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01157-CV

No. 05-14-01158-CV

No. 05-14-01159-CV

No. 05-14-01160-CV

No. 05-14-01161-CV

IN RE C.T. AND T.T., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 13-21229-U

Trial Court Cause No. 10-12513-2

Trial Court Cause No. 13-21227-2

Trial Court Cause No. 01-11212-U

Trial Court Cause No. 12-275-U

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O'Neill, Lang, and Brown

Opinion by Justice O'Neill

Relators filed this petition for writ of mandamus complaining of numerous actions of the 

trial court. The facts and issues are well-known to the parties so we do not recount them here. 

Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly 

abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. 

Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we 

conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P.
–2–

52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). 

Accordingly, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

141157F.P05

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
#### United States *v.*C. Huffmaster.

(No. 4,997.)

*(Circuit Court, N. D. California.*

May 21, 1888.)

*J. C. Carey,*U. S. Atty., for plaintiff.

*Wm. H. Coolt,*for defendant.

Before Sawyer, Circuit Judge.

Sawyer, J.

This is an action similar to the last, to recover 150 cords of wood cut upon public lands, of the alleged value of $960, commenced on July 12, 1837. For reasons given in the two preceding,cases, (Nos. 3,704 and 4,998,) the suit must be dismissed, without prejudice, for -want of jurisdiction, and it is so ordered.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14704]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on May 1, 2009, Noramco Inc., 
Division of Ortho-McNeil, Inc., 1440 Olympic Drive, Athens, Georgia 
30601, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of 
Noroxymorphone (9668), a basic class of controlled substance listed in 
schedule II.
    The company plans to bulk manufacture the above listed controlled 
substance for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152; and must be filed no later 
than August 24, 2009.

    Dated: June 15, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-14704 Filed 6-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P