alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      596
<ALLOWANCES>                                        61
<INVENTORY>                                         16
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   818
<PP&E>                                           9,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,132
<BONDS>                                          1,432
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,595
<OTHER-SE>                                       (211)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,015
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,428
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    731
<INCOME-TAX>                                       305
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                426
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (3)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       423
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Norse Energy Corp. USA, Appellant, v Town of Dryden et al., Respondents. Dryden Resources Awareness Coalition, Proposed Intervenor.

Submitted June 24, 2013;

decided August 29, 2013

Motion by the Washington Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1           
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                 202,077
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       202,472
<PP&E>                                  13,556
<DEPRECIATION>                          13,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         202,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   18,472
<BONDS>                                      0
<COMMON>                                 1,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                              19,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           202,472
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         4,619
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        13,409
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (8,790)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            (8,790)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0
        


</TABLE>
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 251 

Expressing support for designation of September as ‘‘National Brain 

Aneurysm Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2019 

Mr. LYNCH (for himself, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. GAETZ, and Ms. 

SPEIER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of September as 

‘‘National Brain Aneurysm Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas an unruptured brain aneurysm can lead to double 

vision, vision loss, loss of sensation, weakness, loss of balance, uncoordination, and speech problems; 

Whereas a brain aneurysm is often discovered when it ruptures and causes a subarachnoid hemorrhage; 

Whereas a subarachnoid hemorrhage can lead to brain damage, hydrocephalus, stroke, and death; 

Whereas each year, more than 30,000 people in the United 

States suffer from ruptured brain aneurysms, and 40 

percent of these people die as a result; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 251 IH 

Whereas annually, between 3,000 and 4,500 people in the 

United States with ruptured brain aneurysms die before 

reaching the hospital; 

Whereas a number of advancements have been made in recent years regarding the detection of aneurysms, including the computerized tomography (CT) scan, the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) test, and the cerebral 

arteriogram, and early detection can save lives; 

Whereas various research studies are currently being conducted in the United States in order to better understand, prevent, and treat brain aneurysms; 

Whereas organizations, such as the Brain Aneurysm Foundation, serve as global leaders for brain aneurysm awareness, education, support, advocacy, and research funding; 

and 

Whereas the month of September would be an appropriate 

month to designate as ‘‘National Brain Aneurysm Awareness Month’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of a ‘‘National 

3 Brain Aneurysm Awareness Month’’; and 

4 (2) continues to support research to prevent, 

5 detect, and treat brain aneurysms. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# Inflammatory Myopathies

> 
Research on muscle diseases such as the inflammatory myopathies is primarily funded by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). 

## What are inflammatory myopathies?

The inflammatory myopathies are a group of rare diseases that involve chronic (long-standing) muscle inflammation, muscle weakness, and in some cases, muscle pain. Myopathy is a general term used to describe a number of conditions affecting the muscles. All myopathies can cause muscle weakness. Both children and adults can be affected.

The four main types of chronic, or long-term, inflammatory myopathy are:
              - Polymyositis, which affects skeletal muscles (the type involved in body movement) on both sides of the body
              - Dermatomyositis, which causes progressive muscle weakness
              - Inclusion body myositis, which is characterized by slow, progressive muscle weakness and muscle shrinking and loss of muscle
              - Necrotizing autoimmune myopathy, which involves muscle weakness in the upper and lower body

The majority of the inflammatory myopathies are considered to be autoimmune disorders, in which the body's immune response system that normally defends against infection and disease attacks its own muscle fibers, blood vessels, connective tissue, organs, or joints.

file-medical

## How can I or my loved one help improve care for people with inflammatory myopathy?

Consider participating in a clinical trial so clinicians and scientists can learn more about the inflammatory myopathies and related disorders.  Clinical research uses human volunteers to help researchers learn more about a disorder and perhaps find better ways to safely detect, treat, or prevent disease. 

All types of volunteers are needed—those who are healthy or may have an illness or disease—of all different ages, sexes, races, and ethnicities to ensure that study results apply to as many people as possible, and that treatments will be safe and effective for everyone who will use them. 

For information about participating in clinical research visit NIH Clinical Research Trials and You. Learn about clinical trials currently looking for people with myopathy at Clinicaltrials.gov.
> Where can I find more information about inflammatory myopathies?
The following organizations offer resources that help individuals, families, friends, and caregivers of people with myopathy and muscle diseases:

Autoimmune AssociationPhone:586-776-3900

Myositis AssociationPhone: 800-821-7356

Muscular Dystrophy AssociationPhone: 800-572-1717

## Learn about related topics

              - Polymyositis
              - Dermatomyositis
              - Inclusion Body Myositis

book-open
#### TAGUE v. DELAWARE, L. & W. R. CO.

Civil Action No. 5757.

District Court, E. D. New York.

April 2, 1946.

William Samuels, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (W. A. Blank, of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff.

John E. Morrissey, of New York City, for defendant.

KENNEDY, District Judge.

On March 26, 1946, I filed a decision, D.C., 5 F.R.D. 323, that there should be a separate trial of the issues raised by the answer concerning plaintiff’s agreement to litigate this case nowhere but in the courts of Pennsylvania. Plaintiff, as I indicated, takes the position that he signed this paper on the basis o'f a fraudulent representation by defendant’s agents that it was a mere receipt.

The parties now submit cross orders: plaintiff’s order provides for the trial of the separate issue to a jury; defendant’s proposed order provides for a trial to the court.

In support of their order counsel for the plaintiff cite a number of cases among them Union Pacific R. Co. v. Harris, 1895, 158 U.S. 326, 15 S.Ct. 843, 39 L.Ed. 1003; Radio Corp. v. Raytheon Co., 1935, 296 U.S. 459, 56 S.Ct. 297, 80 L.Ed. 327; and Beagle v. Northern Pac. R. Co., D.C.W.D.Wash., 1940, 32 F.Supp. 17. Defendant says the decision of this matter is ruled by Ross v. Service Lines, D.C.E.D.Ill., 1940, 31 F.Supp. 871; Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., D.C.E.D.N.Y., 1938, 23 F.Supp. 420; and Union Pac. R. Co. v. Syas, 8 Cir., 1917, 246 F. 561.

It seems clear to me that where a defendant pleads an agreement of this kind, and the plaintiff takes the position that he never intended to sign a paper embodying such a contract then the issue raised is “legal” rather than “equitable”. As I understand Rule 38, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, plaintiff by demanding a jury is insisting upon a jury trial of “all the issues so triable”. Rule 38(c). It would be wrong for me to deprive him of a jury in the circumstances of this case.

I have signed plaintiff’s proposed order.
WILLIAM BRADLEY 

EDMONSON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3111

Opinion filed December 30, 2015.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

William Bradley Edmonson, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

THOMAS, SWANSON, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
[995 NE2d 170, 972 NYS2d 208]

#### In the Matter of Dagan Lacorte, Appellant, v Howard L. Cytryn et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent. (And Another Proceeding.)

Argued August 21, 2013;

decided August 22, 2013

*1023APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Stroock, Stroock & Lavan, LLP,*New York City *(Jerry H. Goldfeder*of counsel), for appellant.

*Alan Goldston,*Scarsdale, for Howard L. Cytryn and others, respondents.

*Jeffrey J. Fortunato, County Attorney,*New City *(Thomas M. Mascola*of counsel), for Rockland County Board of Elections, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

The Appellate Division properly determined that the validating petition did not sufficiently specify which determinations of the Board petitioner claimed were erroneous *(see Matter of Krueger v Richards,*59 NY2d 680, 682 [1983]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-A  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 12th day of November, 2004.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-A
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income Limited  Partnership  II-A and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited Partnership  II-A and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
96-1589.

#### In re Sweeney.

IT IS ORDERED by this court, *sua sponte,*effective May 7, 1997, that Raymond John Sweeney, Attorney Registration No. 0054540, last known address in Toledo, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of September 25, 1996, to wit: failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before October 25, 1996.
EXHIBIT 23(ii)



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-26769) of Medicore, Inc. and in the related
Prospectus of our report dated March 9, 2001, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Medicore, Inc. for the years ended December
31, 200 and 1999 included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K/A2, as amended) for
the year ended December 31, 2000, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.


                                        /s/ WISS & COMPANY, LLP



May 25, 2001
Livingston, New Jersey
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                             BKF CAPITAL GROUP, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of BKF Capital Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Glenn
A. Aigen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 (including subsections (a) (b) and (c) thereof), as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



     /s/  Glenn A. Aigen
---------------------------------
Glenn A. Aigen
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 263 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 263

 Expressing support for the designation of April 9, 2019, as National 
                           Yellow Ribbon Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2019

   Mr. Tonko (for himself and Mr. Wenstrup) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for the designation of April 9, 2019, as National 
                           Yellow Ribbon Day.

Whereas yellow is the official color of the active combat arms branch of the 
        United States Army;
Whereas the yellow ribbon symbol was first used in the United States to mark 
        national unity and remembrance for the 52 Americans held hostage in Iran 
        for 444 days, beginning on November 4, 1979;
Whereas, during the Persian Gulf war, Americans again used the yellow ribbon to 
        promote solidarity for United States troops;
Whereas, in 2006, the New York State Assembly and Senate unanimously proclaimed 
        April 9 to be New York State Yellow Ribbon Day;
Whereas April 9, 2004, was the day Staff Sgt. Keith Matthew Maupin of Batavia, 
        Ohio, was captured in Iraq, making him the Iraq war's first POW/MIA;
Whereas yellow ribbons worn on lapels or clothing traditionally represent the 
        message of ``support our troops''; and
Whereas National Yellow Ribbon Day is a day for all Americans to celebrate our 
        current active duty troops: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of National Yellow Ribbon Day.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Broadband WirelessInternational Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period endedMarch 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Dr. Ron Tripp, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of	Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly	presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of	operations of the Company.

*/s/Dr. Ron Tripp       *

Dr. Ron Tripp

Chief Executive Officer

 

July 14, 2005
# Fourth **C ourt**  **o f**  **A ppeals**  **San Antonio, Texas**
September 1, 2020
No. 04-20-00127- CR Frank Henry WESCH , Jr., Appellant
v. The ST A TE of T exas, Appellee
From t he 451st Judicial District Court , Kendall County, Texas

Trial C ourt N o. 17- 378- CR Honorable K irsten Cohoon, Judge P re siding



### ORDE R
The S tate's M otio n f

or Extension o f Time to F ile B r ief is G RANTED in p art. Th e S tate's B rief is d ue October 16, 2020.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

I N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the s eal of the said court on this 1st day of September, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
2003 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

9-19-2003

Video Pipeline Inc v. Buena Vista Home

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 02-2497

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Video Pipeline Inc v. Buena Vista Home" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 227.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/227
PRECEDENTIAL

Filed September 19, 2003

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

02-2497

VIDEO PIPELINE, INC.

v.

BUENA VISTA HOME ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

BUENA VISTA HOME ENTERTAINMENT, INC.;

MIRAMAX FILM CORP.,

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs

v.

VIDEO PIPELINE, INC.,

Counterclaim-Defendant

Video Pipeline, Inc.,

Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Civil Action No. 00-cv-05236)

District Judge: Honorable Jerome B. Simandle

Argued January 21, 2003

Before: BECKER,* NYGAARD, and AMBRO, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed August 26, 2003)

* Judge Becker concluded his term as Chief Judge on May 4, 2003. 
ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The opinion in the above case is hereby amended as

follows: 

1. On page 2, the list of counsel for Appellees shall read

as follows: 

Gary A. Rosen, Esquire (Argued) 

Law Offices of Gary A. Rosen, P.C. 

1831 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Patrick Madamba, Jr., Esquire

Akins, Grump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP

2005 Market Street

One Commerce Square, Suite 2200

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Attorneys for Appellee

2. On page 5, footnote 3, the third paragraph of the

footnote is deleted in its entirety. 

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro

Circuit Judge

Dated: September 19, 2003

A True Copy:

Teste:

Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2