alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2



[bfdi_ex102002.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102004.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102006.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102008.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102010.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102012.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102014.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102016.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102018.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102020.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102022.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102024.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102026.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102028.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102030.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102032.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102034.gif]



---

[bfdi_ex102036.gif]
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-F  ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 12th day of August, 2005.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-F
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-F and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-F and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 20, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00091

- CV

Melissa HERNANDEZ

, Appellant

v.

CHRISTUS SPOH N HEALTH SYSTEM CORP., d/b/a Christus Spohn Hospit al Kleberg, Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas
Trial Court No. 13

- 0352114

- CV Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On February 4, 2014, the appellant

, Melissa Hernandez, filed a motion for new trial and a notice of appeal. On June 16, 2014, the trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record. On June 19,
2014 , the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal filed a notification of late record, stating that the appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s record.

We, therefore, ORDER the appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s
f

ee. If the appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appellant’s brief will be due within thirty days from the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points raised in the appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 20th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 99.1

  STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Daine Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Arthur Seidenfeld, Chief Executive and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify that:

  *  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  *  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ Arthur Seidenfeld
---------------------
Arthur Seidenfeld Director,
President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

October 18, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32B

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending November 25, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I
Barry C. Safrit, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Barry C. Safrit                              
|Barry C. Safrit                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bassett Furniture
Industries, Incorporated and will be retained by Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131100 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

BRANDON CASSISE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131100 

 COA: 257299 

Oakland CC: 2003-052129-NZ 

WALLED LAKE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS, 

DAVID BARRY, NICK CONTI, and CHUCK 

APAP, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0821 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 29, 2006 

 Clerk
NUMBER 13-15-00139-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING, Appellant,

v.

BERNARDINO PEDRAZA JR., Appellee.

On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas

ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s unopposed motion to abate the 

appeal to allow the parties the opportunity to engage in settlement negotiations, and 

unopposed motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the 
2

unopposed motion to abate, is of the opinion that the unopposed motion to abate the 

appeal pending settlement should be granted. The motion to abate the appeal is 

GRANTED and this appeal is ordered ABATED until June 1, 2015. Appellant’s motion 

to extend the deadline for filing the reporter’s record to May 8, 2015, is GRANTED.

The Court directs appellant to file, on or before June 1, 2015, either (1) a motion 

to reinstate the appeal, or (2) a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to settlement. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

7th day of May, 2015.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of


Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Anthony Hayes, Director and Chief Executive Officer of Spherix Incorporated (the “Company”), in compliance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:





·Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





·The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony Hayes

Anthony Hayes

Director Chief Executive Officer

April 9, 2014





A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Spherix Incorporated and will be retained by Spherix Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                          SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-G ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies  with the  requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the information  contained  in  the Report fairly  presents,  in all
            material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and   results  of
            operations of the Issuer.

      Dated this 13th day of August, 2002.

                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-G
                              ("Issuer")

                              //S//Dennis R. Neill
                              -------------------------------------
                              Dennis R. Neill
                              President (Chief Executive Officer)

                              //s//Craig D. Loseke
                              -------------------------------------
                              Craig D. Loseke
                              Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     BARRINGER TECHNOLOGIES INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
     DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000010119
<NAME>                        BARRINGER TECHNOLOGIES INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                         18,802
<SECURITIES>                                   15,606
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                      626
<INVENTORY>                                     3,943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               49,056
<PP&E>                                          4,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,883
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 52,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,359
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                        92
<COMMON>                                           79
<OTHER-SE>                                     48,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   52,644
<SALES>                                        20,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               20,458
<CGS>                                           7,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                9,373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,122
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,309)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             4,431
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,431
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.58
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Nigel Williamson, Appellant, v New York State Office of Children and Family Services et al., Respondents.

[977 NYS2d 280]

In a proceeding pursuant to CELR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Office of Children and Family Services, dated November 30, 2011, denying the petitioner’s request to expunge sealed, unfounded reports maintained by the New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment, the petitioner appeals from a judg*731ment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated August 24, 2012, which denied the petition and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

As the petitioner correctly contends, and the respondents concede, the Supreme Court erred in denying the petition based on a failure to exhaust administrative remedies, since the petitioner was not entitled to a hearing with regard to his request to have the subject unfounded reports expunged *(see*Social Services Law § 422 [5] [c]).

Nonetheless, we affirm the judgment denying the petition and, in effect, dismissing the proceeding, because the petitioner, although afforded a full opportunity to do so, failed to present clear and convincing written evidence to the respondent affirmatively refuting the allegations in the reports *(see*Social Services Law § 422 [5] [c]; *see e.g. Matter of Anonymous v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs.,*53 AD3d 810, 812 [2008]). Accordingly, the challenged determination was not arbitrary and capricious. Mastro, J.E, Lott, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3137 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that solar electric 

property need not be located on the property with respect to which 

it is generating electricity in order to qualify for the residential energy 

efficient property credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 18, 2010 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself, Mr. BENNET, and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that solar electric property need not be located on the 

property with respect to which it is generating electricity 

in order to qualify for the residential energy efficient 

property credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Solar Uniting Neigh5 borhoods (SUN) Act of 2010’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3137 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO LOCATION OF 

2 SOLAR ELECTRIC PROPERTY. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 25D(d)(2) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘The term’’ and inserting the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term’’, and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(B) OFF-SITE PROPERTY.— 

11 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Such term shall 

12 include an expenditure for qualified prop13 erty described in the subparagraph (A) 

14 notwithstanding— 

15 ‘‘(I) whether such qualified prop16 erty is located on the same site as the 

17 dwelling unit for which the electricity 

18 generated from such property is used, 

19 and 

20 ‘‘(II) whether the electricity gen21 erated by the qualified property enters 

22 the electrical grid, so long as such 

23 electricity enters the grid at any point 

24 located on the same local electrical 

25 grid to which such dwelling unit is 

26 connected. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3137 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) QUALIFIED PROPERTY.—For 

2 purposes of this subparagraph, the term 

3 ‘qualified property’ means property— 

4 ‘‘(I) which is not used in a trade 

5 or business or an activity engaged in 

6 for profit, and 

7 ‘‘(II) the electricity generated 

8 from which does not result in annual 

9 income to the taxpayer in excess of 

10 amounts that would otherwise be 

11 charged to such taxpayer for elec12 tricity used at the taxpayer’s resi13 dence during the year. 

14 ‘‘(iii) RECAPTURE.—The Secretary 

15 may provide for the recapture of the credit 

16 under this subsection with respect to any 

17 property described in this subparagraph 

18 which ceases to be qualified property.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

21 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
BANDAG, INCORPORATED
                   Description of Short-term Compensation Plan

         As part of the total compensation package for members of the Executive
Leadership Team ("ELT"), the Management Continuity and Compensation Committee
("MCC") of the Board of Directors sets annual earnings per share ("EPS") targets
for the Company. The MCC then grants contingent award values to the members of
the ELT. The award values are typically based on a percentage of the target
compensations for members of the ELT set by the MCC. The awards are payable in
restricted shares of Class A Common Stock if the EPS targets are met.

         The MCC sets the EPS targets and award values to members of the ELT as
follows: the first is a Threshold EPS, below which no restricted stock grants
are made and, if met, provides for the lowest award value; the second is a
Target EPS, which provides for a higher award value if the Target EPS is met;
and the third is a Superior EPS, which provides for the highest award value if
the Superior EPS is met. If EPS falls between identified target EPS numbers,
arithmetical interpolation is used to determine the award value. The number of
shares of restricted stock to be granted are computed by dividing an individual
award value by the fair market value of a share of Class A Common Stock on the
date of the first Board of Directors meeting following the end of the fiscal
year. Except in the case of death, disability or retirement, the shares of
restricted stock become freely transferable after three years from the date of
grant.

         Members of the Executive Leadership Team currently consists of Martin
G. Carver, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Warren
W. Heidbreder, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, John C.
McErlane, Vice President, Marketing and Sales, and Nathaniel L. Derby II, Vice
President, Manufacturing Design.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apogent Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DENNIS BROWNDennis Brown Chief Financial Officer August 9, 2004




This certification accompanies
this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.