alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.4



SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WITH EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS*



|Name                |  | Date of Agreement |  | Title                                                  |  | Initial Annual Base Salary
|------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------
|                    |  |                   | 
|Robert V. Ahlgren   |  | April 1, 2002     |  | Group PresidentLabware and Life Sciences              |  | $320,000                  
|                    |  |                   | 
|Michael K. Bresson  |  | December 7, 2001  |  | Executive Vice PresidentGeneral Counsel and Secretary |  | $310,000                  
|                    |  |                   | 
|Dennis B. Brown     |  | April 1, 2003     |  | Chief Financial Officer                                |  | $322,500                  
|                    |  |                   | 
|Gary J. Marmontello |  | December 7, 2001  |  | Vice President, Human Resources                        |  | $221,000                  
|                    |  |                   | 
|Peter Scheu         |  | December 7, 2001  |  | Group President, Clinical Diagnostics                  |  | $275,000                  
|                    |  |                   | 
|Michael S. Smith    |  | June 18, 2003     |  | Vice President of Strategic Initiatives                |  | $250,000                  
|                    |  |                   | 
|Mark F. Stuppy      |  | December 7, 2001  |  | Group President, Clinical Consumables                  |  | $246,000                  
|                    |  |                   | 
|Stephen K. Wiatt    |  | December 15, 2000 |  | Group President, Industrial Glass                      |  | $267,400                  



*Mr. Jellinek, the President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, is a party to a separate form of Employment Agreement that was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2001.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3443 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3443

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to eliminate the 30-day 
              time limit for approving exploration plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 27 (legislative day, May 26), 2010

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to eliminate the 30-day 
              time limit for approving exploration plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPLORATION PLANS FOR OFFSHORE DRILLING.

    Section 11(c)(1) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 
U.S.C. 1340(c)(1)) is amended in the fourth sentence by striking 
``within thirty days of its submission,''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P (the
“Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Halbert S. Washburn, Co-Chief Executive Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLC, the
general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.





/s/ HALBERT S. WASHBURNHalbert
      S. WashburnCo-Chief
      Executive Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLCDated:  May
      8, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-146]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New 
Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 17, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, February 17, 2009, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time. For more 
information please contact Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-
488-2085. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written 
statement, please write Audrey Y. Jenkins, TAP Office, 10 MetroTech 
Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or you can post comments 
to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: December 22, 2008.
Roy L. Block,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E9-146 Filed 1-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40927

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CORNELIO HERNANDEZ-GURUSCIATA, also known as Cornelio 

Hernandez, also known as Cornelio Hernandez-Gurugeinte, also

known as Leonel Lopez-Hernandez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:06-CR-226

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Cornelio

Hernandez-Gurusciata raises arguments that are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998),

which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 15, 2010

s0708 

# Order

July 15, 2010

140336

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140336 COA: 293833 Wayne CC: 05-005425 MARIO TIMOTHY JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 23, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is cons idered. We DIRECT the Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after
the date of this order.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
#### EMICH MOTOR CORPORATION et al. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al.

Civ. A. No. 3514.

District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

Sept. 15, 1942.

Thomas Dodd Healy and A. Bradley Eben, both of Chicago, 111., for plaintiff.

Ernest S. Ballard and Ferris E. Hurd, both, of Chicago, 111., for defendant.

HOLLY, District Judge.

In my opinion this complaint should be redrafted. We are not interested in this action in all the activities of defendant corporation but only in those that affected the plaintiffs. If defendants by their alleged combination in restraint of trade affected the business of plaintiffs, the complaint should state in general terms the nature of their agreement or combination and then set forth what was done that injured plaintiffs. Copying the indictment in the criminal case does not constitute a compliance with the rule that the complaint shall contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the plaintiff is entitled to relief.”

An order accordingly will be entered September 16, 1942, at 10 o’clock, a. m.
July 9, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HENRY RICHARD BULLOCK, JR., Appellant

NO. 14-14-00304-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Nicolasa PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-71265.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Filed June 21, 2006.

Nicolasa Perez, Paramount, CA, pro se.

CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Nancy E. Friedman, Esq., Paul Fiorino, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: WALLACE, KLEINFELD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Nicolasa Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals order affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review due process claims in immigration proceedings de novo, *Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Perez’s contention that the IJ misapplied relevant BIA precedent to the facts of her case because this contention does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim that overcomes the jurisdictional bar to our review of the agency’s discretionary hardship determination. *See Martinez-Rosas*at 930 (“[tjraditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”); *see also Sanchez-Cruz v. INS,*255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir.2001) (holding that the “misapplication of case law” may not be reviewed).

Perez’s contention that the IJ denied her right to a full and fair hearing is unpersuasive. Although the IJ guided Perez’s testimony to address certain factors, Perez’s counsel was able to elicit relevant evidence supporting her hardship claim, and it cannot be said that the proceedings were “so fundamentally unfair that [she] was prevented from reasonably presenting [her] case.” *Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000) (citation omitted). Moreover, Perez failed to demonstrate that additional testimony would have affected the outcome of the proceedings. *See id.*(requiring prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 02/72-0625]

Notice is hereby given that Founders Equity SBIC I, L.P., 711 Fifth Avenue, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10022, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Founders Equity SBIC I, L.P. proposes to provide equity security financing to Richardson Foods, Inc., 101 Erie Blvd., Canajoharie, NY 13317. The financing will provide the company with additional capital to fund an acquisition and to meet working capital requirements, and for debt repayment.

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a) of the Regulations because Founders Equity NY, L.P., an Associate of Founders Equity SBIC I, L.P., owns more than ten percent of Richardson Foods, Inc. and therefore Richardson Foods, Inc. is considered an Associate of Founders Equity SBIC I, L.P. as defined in § 107.50 of the Regulations.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

Dated: June 9, 2009.

Harry Haskins,

Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. E9-14813 Filed 6-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Earl Bell, Jr., Appellant.

Submitted January 7, 2013;

decided January 10, 2013

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Alex Smith, Esq., 6 North Street, Middletown, New York 10940 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
KATHERINE ANNE SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

DOUGLAS W. SMITH AND E. 

DREW MITCHELL, 

INDIVIDUALLY, AS COPERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE 

ESTATE OF ROBERT H. 

SMITH, AND AS COTRUSTEES OF THE ROBERT 

H. SMITH MARITAL TRUST,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2621

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 6, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

James C. Hankinson, Judge.

F. Wallace Pope, Jr., Brandon D. Bellew, and Caitlein J. Jammo of Johnson, Pope, 

Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Dubose Ausley and Kevin A. Forsthoefel of Ausley McMullen, Tallahassee; James 

P. Judkins and Larry D. Simpson of Judkins, Simpson & Schulte, Tallahassee, for 

Appellees.
2

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WINOKUR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the filing by Camelot Corporation (the "Company") of the
Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  April  30,  2004  (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operation of the Company.







                                               /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Danny Wettreich
                                               Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  July 28, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 

[74 FR 28293, June 15, 2009]

# Status: 

Closed Meeting.

# Place: 

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

# Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting: 

Friday, June 19, 2009 at 11 a.m.

# Change in the Meeting: 

Additional Item.

The following item has been added to the Friday, June 19, 2009 Closed Meeting agenda: Formal Order of Investigation.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(c)(3), (5), (7) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7) and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, determined that Commission business required the above change and that no earlier notice thereof was possible. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: June 16, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-14538 Filed 6-17-09; 11:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 23, 2009

d1116 

# Order

November 23, 2009

139036

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139036 COA: 282613 Wayne CC: 07-006705-FC VINCENT EDWARD EMERY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 21

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES*



|(a) | Bassett Furniture Industries of North Carolina, LLC. (North Carolina limited liability Corporation )
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | The E.B. Malone Corporation (Delaware Corporation)
|--- | --------------------------------------------------



|(c) | Bassett Direct Stores, LLC. (Virginia limited liability Corporation)
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



|(d) | Bassett Direct NC, LLC (Virginia limited liability company)
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------



|(e) | Bassett Direct SC, LLC (Virginia limited liability company)
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------



|(f) | The Accessories Group, Inc. (Virginia Corporation)
|--- | --------------------------------------------------



|(g) | Bassett Industries Alternative Asset Fund, L.P. (99.95% ownership) (Delaware limited partnership)
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(h) | LRG Furniture, LLC (Virginia limited liability company)
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------



|(i) | BDP, LC (Texas limited liability company)
|--- | -----------------------------------------



|(j) | BFD-Atlanta, LLC (Virginia limited liability company)
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------



|(k) | BD Boston, LLC (Virginia limited liability corporation)
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------



|(l) | BDU NY, LLC (Virginia limited liability company)
|--- | ------------------------------------------------



|* | All subsidiaries are wholly-owned unless otherwise noted.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------
#### In the Matter of Village of Port Chester, Appellant. Dominick D. Bologna et al., Respondents.

Submitted September 9, 2012;

decided November 20, 2012

Motion by G&S Port Chester, LLC for leave to file a memorandum of law amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the memorandum of law is accepted as filed.