alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 23, 1999


Stephen A. Cloughley
929 Gainsway Road
Yardley, PA  19067

Dear Stephen:

To confirm your previous conversation with Thomas Gardner, this is to advise you
of your termination of employment effective April 23, 1999.

You will receive  severance pay,  accrued  vacation,  and final pay representing
employment  through April 23, 1999. As mutually  agreed with Mr.  Gardner,  this
severance amount totals $60,000.  After  accounting for the $30,000  outstanding
personal  loan  that you have  with  the  company,  this  results  in a  $30,000
severance  payment.  Your  acceptance of the severance  payment is considered an
agreement not to accept  employment  either  directly or as a consultant  with a
direct  competitor of Base Ten  including  POMS and ProPack Data for a period of
two years.

Your health,  dental, and life insurance will remain in effect through April 30,
1999. Effective May 1, 1999 you will be eligible to continue your current health
and dental  coverage  through COBRA,  and you would be eligible for three months
medical coverage at no cost to you through the Aetna U.S.  Healthcare Safety Net
Program.  Jo Ann Fechter will answer any questions that you may have and explain
COBRA and 401(k) options to you during your exit interview.

Stephen,  we  appreciate  your  contributions  to the  company  over  this  past
five-year period. We expect to maintain a consulting relationship with you going
forward,  and estimate the need to use a minimum  fifty days of your time during
1999 at a daily rate to you of $1,200.00.

Very truly yours,

WILLIAM F. HACKETT
-------------------
William F. Hackett
Senior Vice President


STEPHEN A. CLOUGHLEY                                 April 23, 1999
---------------------------                          --------------------
Accepted - Stephen A. Cloughley                      Date
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6029

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY WHITE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-91-106) Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 10, 1999 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney White, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rodney White appeals the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his action seeking to correct a procedurally deficient forfeiture. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny White’s motion for the appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. White , No. CR-91-106 (E.D. Va. Dec. 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Grants &amp; Funding
35 of 36
                                       
                                                            EXHIBIT 15
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Certified Public Accountants
345 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10154


                  Independent Auditors' Review Report
                  ----------------------------------


The Board of Directors
First Fidelity Bancorporation:


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated statement of condition
of First Fidelity Bancorporation and subsidiaries as of September 30,
1995, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 1995 and 1994.  These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of First Fidelity Bancorporation's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of
interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of
persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications
that should be made to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, the consolidated statement of condition of First
Fidelity Bancorporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1994
(presented herein) and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended
(not presented herein); and in our report dated January 18, 1995, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements.



KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
October 12, 1995
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000826345
<NAME> GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD. PARTNERSHIP II-B
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         492,664
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  530,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,023,095
<PP&E>                                      22,202,493
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,985,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,399,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,050
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,215,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,399,692
<SALES>                                      2,844,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,915,406
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,172,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                743,163
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            743,163
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   743,163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 118 (Monday, June 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14511]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel;
    Date: July 22, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20895 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Marilyn Moore-Hoon, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Dental and 
Craniofacial Research, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Rm. 676, Bethesda, MD 
20892-4878, 301-594-4861, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aec3c1c1dccbc3cfdceec0c7cacddc80c0c7c680c9c1d8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81eceeeef3e4ece0f3c1efe8e5e2f3afefe8e9afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 12, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-14511 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marche Johnson, Appellant.

Submitted August 6, 2012;

decided August 28, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Adam H. Van Buskirk, Esq., 3100 State Route 90, Aurora, New York 13026 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Exhibit 10.5


 


AGREEMENT


 


This Agreement is entered into as of July 22,
2013 between Silverstar Mining Corp., a Nevada corporation (“Silverstar” or the “Company”) and Elco Securities
Ltd. (“Lender”).


 


WHEREAS, on or about
June 8, 2012 Lender loaned Silverstar $15,000, and on or about October 2, 2012 Lender loaned Silverstar $7,500, and on or about
January 25, 2013 Lender loaned Silverstar $10,000, in aggregate $32,500; and


 


WHEREAS, the loan
agreements have been memorialized in a demand notes dated June 8, 2012, and January 25, 2013; and


 


WHEREAS, Silverstar
does not have sufficient funds to satisfy the loan obligations; and


 


WHEREAS, on July
22, 2013 the Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan whereby debt holders could convert their loan into shares of common
stock at a conversion rate of $0.35 per share; and


 


WHEREAS, Lender
has agreed to exchange the loan obligation(s) for the convertible debenture;


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
it is mutually agreed that:


 


1. SilverStar shall execute
the attached convertible debenture solely in exchange for the $32,500 loans plus accrued interest made by Lender to Silverstar.


 


2. Upon execution of the
convertible debenture, all sums otherwise due and payable by Silverstar are hereby incorporated in the convertible debenture. In
case of default, Lender’s sole remedy shall be pursuant to the Convertible Debenture.


 


3. This Agreement
shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Nevada. Jurisdiction for any dispute shall be
in the state of Nevada. In the event of any litigation, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all costs including
attorney fees.


 


4. Each party acknowledges
and represents that each party has either retained independent legal counsel or had sufficient time to retain independent legal
counsel to review this Agreement and the Convertible Debenture.


 




    	 



    	 



    


 


This Agreement is executed this 22nd
day of July, 2013


 


	Silverstar Mining Corp.	 
	 	 	 
	BY:	/s/ Neil Kleinman	 
		Neil Kleinman	 
	ITS:	CEO	 
	 	 	 
	Lender	 
	 	 	 
	BY:	/s/ Isaac Collie	 
		 Isaac Collie	 
	ITS:	Authorized Signatory
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 17, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 28635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14265]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 635

[Docket No. 080728943-9716-02]
RIN 0648-AX12


Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; 2009 Atlantic Bluefin Tuna 
Quota Specifications and Effort Controls; Correction

AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION:  Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  NMFS published a final rule in the Federal Register on June 
1, 2009, concerning the final 2009 fishing year specifications for the 
Atlantic bluefin tuna (BFT) fishery, including quotas for each of the 
established domestic fishing categories and effort controls for the 
General category and Angling category. While the effective dates in the 
DATES section were correct, the rule contained a typo with regard to 
effective dates of the BFT daily retention limits in the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION section. This document corrects that typo.

DATES:  This correction is effective on June 1, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah McLaughlin, 978-281-9260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In rule FR Doc. E9-12654 that published in the Federal Register on 
June 1, 2009 (74 FR 26112) make the following correction. On page 
26112, in the first column, revise SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION sections 
IV and V to read as follows:

IV. General Category Effort Controls

    Because of the large quota available for the General category, NMFS 
increases the daily retention limit of BFT for the June-August 
subperiod from the default one-fish retention limit to a three-fish 
limit. Therefore, persons aboard vessels permitted in the General 
category may retain three large medium or giant BFT (measuring 73 
inches or greater) per vessel per day/trip from June 1, 2009 through 
August 31, 2009. The BFT retention limit may be adjusted via inseason 
action, if warranted, under Sec.  635.23(a)(4).

V. Angling Category Effort Controls

    This final rule establishes an Angling category retention limit of 
one school BFT (27 inches to less than 47 inches), and one large 
school/small medium BFT (47 inches to less than 73 inches) per vessel 
per day/trip. This retention limit is effective for persons aboard 
vessels permitted in the Angling category from June 1, 2009 through 
December 31, 2009. This retention limit may be adjusted via inseason 
action, if warranted, under Sec.  635.23(b)(3).

    Dated: June 11, 2009.
Kristen C. Koch,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-14265 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
Exhbit 10.1 Schedule 6.1(f) Format of Joint Venture Reporting






	
																									
	Schedule 6.1(f)

	M/I Homes

	Joint Ventures

	DATE: ________________

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	12 mo.
	 

	 
	 
	M/I
	Managing
	Additional
	Year
	 
	 
	 
	 
	M/I
	M/I
	 

	Joint Venture Name
	Market
	% Ownership
	Member
	Member(s)
	Formed
	Assets
	Liabilities
	Debt
	Equity
	Investment
	Earnings (Loss)
	Lender

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	NAME
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	NAME
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	NAME
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	NAME
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	NAME
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	NAME
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	NAME
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	—
	—
	—
	—
	—
	—
	 

	NAME
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	—
	—
	—
	—
	—
	—
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	TOTAL
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	$
	—
	

	$
	—
	

	$
	—
	

	$
	—
	

	$
	—
	

	$
	—
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	PLUS M/I SUB DEBT TO JVs
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	—
	 
	 

	LESS IMPAIRMENT
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	M/I INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	$
	—
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 117 (Friday, June 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29206-29207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14450]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM08-11-000]


North American Electric Reliability Corporation; Notice of Filing

June 12, 2009.
    Take notice that on May 29, 2009, the North American Electric 
Reliability Corporation (NERC) submitted modifications to Violation 
Severity Levels (VSLs) for three revised Facilities Design, 
Connections, and Maintenance (FAC) Reliability Standards: FAC-010-2--
System Operating Limits Methodology for the Planning Horizon; FAC-011-
2--System Operating Limits Methodology for the Operations Horizon; and 
FAC-014-2--Establish and Communicate System Operating Limits in 
compliance with Order No. 722 issued on March 20, 2009, 126 FERC ] 
61,255 (2009).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to

[[Page 29207]]

the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice 
of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aceae9feefe3c2c0c5c2c9ffd9dcdcc3ded8eccac9decf82cbc3da"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="41070413020e2f2d282f24123431312e333501272433226f262e37">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on July 6, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-14450 Filed 6-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 117 (Friday, June 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29248-29249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11750 and <greek-i>11751]


West Virginia Disaster Number WV-00012

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-1838-DR), dated 05/
15/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Mudslides, and Landslides.
    Incident Period: 05/03/2009 through 06/08/2009.

 Effective Date: 06/12/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/14/2009.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/15/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration

[[Page 29249]]

for the State of West Virginia, dated 05/15/2009 is hereby amended to 
include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:
Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Calhoun.
Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    West Virginia: Braxton, Clay, Gilmer, Ritchie, Roane, Wirt.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-14368 Filed 6-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### MASSACHUSETTS BONDING & INS. CO. v. HARRISBURG TRUST CO.

No. 4159.

District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania.

Dec. 18, 1941.

*198See, also, D.C., 27 F.Supp. 987.

Swartz, Campbell & Henry, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Braddock and Sohn, by Victor Braddock, of Harrisburg, Pa., for plaintiff.

Snyder, Hull, Leiby & Metzger, by Arthur H. Hull, of Harrisburg, Pa., for defendant.

JOHNSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff bonding company executed a bond to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to secure deposits by the Commonwealth in the defendant bank. Plaintiff alleges that the premium of $1,000, due from defendant annually on December 6, was unpaid in the years 1933 to 1937 inclusive, and that during those years the bond was in effect. On February 11, 1938, plaintiff instituted this action to recover the above premiums with interest. On June 24, 1940; plaintiff served defendant with twenty-three (23) interrogatories to be answered by it. Defendant has objected to interrogatories numbered 8, 20, 21, 22, and 23 on the grounds that the information sought is not relevant to the issues raised by the pleadings.

 After hearing oral argument and carefully considering the briefs filed, the court has decided that the objections must be sustained. The five interrogatories in question ask certain information covering the period from November 21, 1932, to June 27, 1940, whereas the facts necessary to support the alleged cause of action must have existed not later than February 11, 1938, the date this action was started. Information concerning transactions or events after that date would be irrelevant and immaterial and would not support the allegations of the complaint. A party will not be required to answer interrogatories where the answers necessarily will be irrelevant and immaterial. The court will limit the interrogatories as justice requires.

For the foregoing reasons the defendant’s exceptions to plaintiff’s interrogatories numbered 8, 20, 21, 22, and 23 are sustained, and the said interrogatories need not be answered as stated. In accordance with the foregoing discussion, defendant hereby is required to answer plaintiff’s interrogatories 8, 20, 21, 22 and 23 concerning transactions between November 21, 1932, and February 11, 1938.