alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION***

***MICS CLASS II - AUDIT CHECKLIST***

***GAMING PROMOTIONS & PLAYER TRACKING SYSTEMS (PTS)***

Page 1 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,832,297
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,096,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,645,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 43,198,615
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    107,821,220
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,517,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             168,407,986
<DEPOSITS>                                 154,020,096
<SHORT-TERM>                                 8,436,347
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            712,517
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       832,910
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,554,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             168,407,986
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,410,990
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,907,297
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               180,516
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,498,803
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,638,037
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,865,880
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,632,923
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                2,027,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              31,682
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,611,768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (391,004)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (183,568)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (183,568)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,218,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   439,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,667,651
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                1,267,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    79,444
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,517,095
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,517,095
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
FIFTH AMENDMENT TOLOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT 

        **THISFIFTH AMENDMENT TO LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT**(**“Amendment”**) is madeeffective this 31th day of January, 2007 by and among **LASALLE BUSINESS CREDIT, LLC**,successor by merger to LaSalle Business Credit, Inc., as Agent(**“Agent”**)****for **LASALLE BANK MIDWEST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION**(formerly known as Standard Federal Bank National Association)****(**“Lender”**), **MTS MEDICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**(formerly knownas Medical Technology Systems, Inc.) (**“MTS”**) and **MTS PACKAGINGSYSTEMS, INC.** (**“Packaging”,**and with **MTS**, each a**“Borrower”** and collectively, the **“Borrowers”**). 

BACKGROUND
Exhibit 32(g)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,

|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.





/s/ Daniel F. Packer                             		Daniel F. Packer
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.


Date:  	March 9, 2005
#### Luis Casas, Appellant, v Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Respondent.

Submitted May 13, 2013;

decided June 27, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of**

**Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Claire L. Kruger, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Spherix Incorporated (the “Company”), in compliance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

 

·                  Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

·                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Claire   L. Kruger            |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   | Claire L.   Kruger                |
|   | Chief Executive Officer and Chief |
|   |    Operating Officer    |
|   | September 16, 2011           |

 

 

A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Spherix Incorporated and will be retained by Spherix Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Stefano Misciagnu, Appellant, v Ocean Avenue Restaurant, Inc., Doing Business as Bridgeview Yacht Club, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[822 NYS2d 706]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered March 9, 2006, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment and granted defendant-respondent’s cross motion to extend its time to answer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In light of the reasonable excuse proffered by defendant-respondent for its delay in answering the complaint, Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting defendant’s cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) *(see Nason v Fisher,*309 AD2d 526 [2003]; *Terrones v Morera,*295 AD2d 254 [2002]). Concur—Tom, J.P, Andrias, Marlow, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
#### Education Plus, Inc., Doing Business as The Family Foundation, Respondent, v Grisel Glasser, Also Known as Grisel Baltazar, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[976 NYS2d 706]

Rose, J.E

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lambert, J.), entered February 27, 2013 in Delaware County, which partially granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

After commencing this action to recover an amount owed by defendants in connection with their child’s attendance at plaintiffs school, plaintiff moved for summary judgment against defendant Grisel Glasser (hereinafter defendant). Supreme Court granted plaintiffs motion on its breach of contract cause of action, and defendant appeals. We now affirm.

Contrary to defendant’s argument, plaintiff established its entitlement to summary judgment by producing the contract entered into by the parties, an account activity report reflecting the various charges incurred and payments made by defend*1126ants, and an affidavit from plaintiffs billing manager explaining the computation of the amount due for services rendered and the applicable finance charges *(see George S. May Intl. Co. v Thirsty*Moose, *Inc.,*19 AD3d 721, 722 [2005]; *Hussey v Leggio Agency,*299 AD2d 690, 691 [2002]). The billing manager’s affidavit adequately explained that her knowledge was based upon the books and records that were made and maintained in the ordinary course of plaintiffs business together with her own personal knowledge of defendants’ account *(see*CPLR 3212 [b]; 4518 [a]; *Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324-325 [1986]). Nor does defendant deny that she entered into the contract and failed to pay the amounts incurred. Instead, she contends that plaintiff did not give her full credit for a deposit of $8,910. However, the billing statements submitted by plaintiff reflect that defendants received credit for their deposit minus the nonrefundable enrollment fee of $4,610, which, pursuant to the contract, is nonrefundable if the student does not complete the program. Defendant does not dispute that her child left the program early without completing it. Defendant’s remaining contention, that plaintiff falsely identified itself as a not-for-profit corporation, was explained by plaintiff as an inadvertent misstatement on its part. In any event, defendant has not shown how any such misstatement would affect the validity of the contract entered into between plaintiff and defendants. As defendant failed to come forward with proof in admissible form raising a triable issue of fact, Supreme Court properly granted the motion for summary judgment on the breach of contract cause of action *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; *Convenient Med. Care v Medical Bus. Assoc.,*291 AD2d 617, 618 [2002]).

Stein, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Order entered October 27, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01220-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.A. A CHILD

On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JD-14-01218-X

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this termination of parental rights appeal is overdue. By postcard 

dated October 13, 2015, we notified Court Reporter Pamela Sumler that the reporter’s record was 

overdue in this case. We directed Ms. Sumler to file the record within ten days and cautioned 

that any request for an extension must be submitted in writing explaining the extraordinary 

reasons for the delay. To date, the Court has not received a response.

Accordingly, we ORDER Pamela Sumler, Official Court Reporter for the 305th Judicial 

District Court, to file, within TEN DAYS, either (1) the reporter’s record; or (2) written 

verification that appellant has not requested the record. 

Because this is a parental termination case, we remind both the trial court and the court 

reporter that it is the responsibility of the court reporter to prepare, certify, and timely file the 

reporter’s record and that the trial court must direct the court reporter to immediately commence 
the preparation of the reporter’s record. The trial court must arrange a substitute reporter if 

necessary. TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(b)(1).

We notify appellant that if we receive verification that no request for the record has been 

made, the appeal will be submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order, by electronic 

transmission, to the following persons:

Honorable Cheryl Lee Shannon 

Presiding Judge of the 305th Judicial District Court

Pamela Sumler

Official Court Reporter, 305th Judicial District Court

All parties

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax Credit Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be Wednesday, July 8, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax Credit Issue Committee will be held Wednesday, July 8, 2009, at 1 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                 

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: May 27, 2009. 

Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. E9-12752 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal will hold a meeting on July 7, 2009, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

### Tuesday, July 7, 2009—8:30 a.m.-12 p.m.

The Subcommittee will discuss the Prairie Island license renewal application and the associated Safety Evaluation Report with Open Items. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, and other interested persons regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.

                    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. Christopher Brown telephone (301) 415-7111 five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted. Detailed procedures for the conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 6, 2008 (73 FR 58268-58269).                

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 6:45 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

 Dated: June 10, 2009.

Cayetano Santos,

Chief, Reactor Safety Branch A, Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.

[FR Doc. E9-14112 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
No. 4910.

(Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.)

#### AMERICAN MANUFACTURING CO. vs. MRS. L. MASSMAN.

Stafford, Lambert & Robinson for plaintiff and appellant.

Lazarus, Michel & Lazarus for defendant and appellee.

ST. PAUL, J.

Plaintiff sold and delivered to defendant certain building materials as follows:

September 30, 1908........................$26.00

October 30, 1908........................... 73.00

November 11,1908......................... 15.00

These sales were all on a credit of thirty days.

On March 23, 1909, plaintiff sued and recovered judgment on the items of October 30th and November 11,1908,

On June 1, 1909, plaintiff filed this suit in which it seeks to recover judgment for the item of September 30th.

Defendant pleads that plaintiff by failing to include this item in the former suit lias waived and abandoned the same under the terms of the Code of Practice, Article 156.

Whilst it is true that at the time the first suit was, filed all three bills were equally due and demandable, it is none-the-less to be observed that the three bills were contracted separately and matured at different times *257thus constituting, not one single indebtedness but three several and entirely distinct debts.

March 7, 1910.

Rehearing refused March 21, 1910.

We are of opinion that it is now the settled jurisprudence that Article J.56 of tLe Code of Practice merely prohibits the dividing of a single and undivisible debt into parts and suing on each part severally.

It has no application to separate and distinct debts, nor where a debt is divisible and the different parts or installments are demandable severally or at different •times.

Brandagie vs. Chamberlain et al., 2 Rob. 207; In re Dimmick, 111 La. 658.

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment appealed from be reversed, and it is now ordered, adjudged and •decreed, that there be judgment in favor of plaintiff, American Manufacturing Co., and against defendant, Mrs. L. Massman, for the full sum of twenty-six dollars $26.00 with legal interest from September 30, 1908, and the costs of both courts, with recognition of plaintiff’s lien as furnisher of materials,' on the building owned by defendant and situated on the corner of Hickory and Cohn Streets in the City of New Orleans.
# NIH-Wide Grants Information

## OER Grants Web Site Map **

*Information about funding opportunities, award data, grants policy, Electronic Research Administration (ERA), Research Involving Human Subjects **, Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare **, reinvention activities, and biomedical engineering.*

## NIH Grants and Contracts Information and Application Forms **

*Information on NIH's extramural research and training programs including NIH's funding opportunities (with application kits), grant policy, and award data that includes access to the RePORT tool **.*

## NIH Extramural Research Training and Career Development Programs **

*Guide to NIH Research Training and Career Development Programs—intramural and extramural opportunities compendium organized by level of training, NIH Program Announcements, and NIH Policy Documents*

## Guidelines for Support of Scientific Meetings by NIH **

*NIMH supports R13 grants. Please see NIMH Notice of Participation of the NIH Support for Conferences and Scientific Meetings (Parent R13 Clinical Trial Not Allowed) **.*

## NIH Grants Policy Statement **

*This is the main NIH Grants Policy document containing information on NIH grants policy statements, terms and conditions of NIH grant awards, terms and conditions for specific types of grants, grantees, and activities, points of contact, and a master list of links to documents external to the NIHGPS.*

## Appeals of Initial Scientific Peer Review **

*Information on the NIH appeals procedures.*
P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

STATE OF TEXAS

PENALTY FOR

PRIVATE USE

Q. U.

j£^ U.S.POSTAGE»PITNEYBOW

ZIP .7 8.701

02 1VV

0001401623 JUL 02 20

00O4

RE: WR-82,652-01

PRESIDING JUDGE 63RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

100 EAST BROADWAY

RETURN TO SENDER

47 EWE-N3^7^a^ft<3..B8

NO MAIL RECEPTACLE

"UNABLE TO FORWARD

BC: 7 8 7;i:123:©e;&8 *21:93 -0:1 41.1 --.e.B•

l||ll1H|M]Hl!Ml"lll:n1J,!,il,P,Hi,:,!hMl!l!,,lll,l,.il,].l
#### Archer Capital Fund, L.P., Respondent, v GEL, LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted June 18, 2012;

decided September 6, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE 290TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on May 13, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise

or reverse your judgment between

Kathleen G. Reyes, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-14-00607-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2013CR5404

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the

trial is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on July 13, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853