alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 412 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 412

  Supporting the designation of May as ``National Lyme and Tick-Borne 
               Disease and Conditions Awareness Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 30, 2019

Mrs. Hartzler (for herself, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Peterson, and 
 Mr. Sires) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Supporting the designation of May as ``National Lyme and Tick-Borne 
               Disease and Conditions Awareness Month''.

Whereas there are an estimated 300,000 new cases of Lyme disease annually, 
        putting undue burden and suffering on countless individuals and 
        families;
Whereas Lyme disease is a rapidly growing epidemic and ticks that transmit Lyme 
        disease are found in half of all United States counties and about 80 
        countries worldwide;
Whereas Lyme disease has no known cure and is difficult to diagnose;
Whereas Lyme disease poses a significant threat to our communities, especially 
        when coupled with other tick-borne illnesses and conditions such as 
        alpha-gal allergy, Babesiosis, Heartland virus, Tularemia, and STARI;
Whereas symptoms are often mistaken for common illnesses but can affect the 
        nervous system, the heart, and joints, leading to arthritic symptoms, 
        paralysis, encephalitis, seizures, and death if left untreated;
Whereas a comprehensive approach utilizing increased education and more research 
        on Lyme and other tick-borne diseases and conditions and their vectors 
        can lead to significant advancements;
Whereas individuals and families should seek out and be aware of best practices 
        for the prevention of tick bites and Lyme and other tick-borne diseases 
        and conditions;
Whereas individuals living in or visiting wooded and other vulnerable areas 
        should check themselves and their loved ones for ticks each day;
Whereas spring marks the beginning of increased tick-bite activity; and
Whereas May would be an appropriate month to designate as ``National Lyme and 
        Tick-Borne Disease and Conditions Awareness Month'': Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of ``National Lyme and Tick-Borne Disease and Conditions 
Awareness Month'' to increase public knowledge of Lyme and other tick-
borne diseases and conditions, raise awareness about the prevention of 
tick bites, and advance the vision of finding cures through critical 
research.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Spherix Incorporated**

 

----

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued ourreports dated March 30, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements in the Annual Report of Spherix Incorporated on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2009.  We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements ofSpherix Incorporated on Form S-8 (File No. 333-66053 effective October 23,1998), on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-44973 effective March 23, 1998,333-79593 effective May 28, 1999, 333-32504 effective April 19, 2000,333-116422 effective June 14, 2004 and 333-126930 effective August 25,2009) and on Form S-2 (File No. 333-126930 effective October 4,2005).

 

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

 

Baltimore, Maryland

March 30, 2010

 

1

----
----

----

| 1.   | The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           | Atlas Mining Company |
|--------------------------------|----------------------|
|                           |                 |   |
| Date:  July 28, 2009 | By:                  | /s/ CHRISTOPHER T. CARNEY |
|                           |                 | Christopher T. Carney |
|                           |                 | Interim Chief Financial Officer |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

B.S.,

Respondent

v.

S.P.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 577 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of March, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
H. Res. 208 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 13, 2019. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the concurrent resolution 

(H. Con. Res. 24) expressing the sense of Congress that the 

report of Special Counsel Mueller should be made available 

to the public and to Congress. All points of order against consideration of the concurrent resolution are waived. The 

amendments to the concurrent resolution and the preamble 

printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The 

concurrent resolution, as amended, shall be considered as 

read. All points of order against provisions in the concurrent 

resolution, as amended, are waived. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution 

and preamble, as amended, to adoption without intervening 

motion or demand for division of the question except one 

hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair 

and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. 
2 

•HRES 208 EH 

SEC. 2. On any legislative day during the period from 

March 15, 2019, through March 22, 2019— 

(a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day 

shall be considered as approved; and 

(b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at a date and time, within the limits of 

clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the adjournment. 

SEC. 3. The Speaker may appoint Members to perform 

the duties of the Chair for the duration of the period addressed by section 2 of this resolution as though under clause 

8(a) of rule I. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,685,214
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         199,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            10,513,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 37,375,484
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    100,764,385
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,108,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             159,952,714
<DEPOSITS>                                 135,895,264
<SHORT-TERM>                                 7,871,730
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            221,257
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,949,874
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,014,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              14,964,463
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,791,718
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,804,045
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               499,712
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             9,095,475
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,178,752
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,570,345
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,525,130
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   25,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (34,555)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,381,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                666,427
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     666,427
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   518,094
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.91
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,099,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    36,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,135,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,649,815
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  373,549
<RECOVERIES>                                   807,341
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,108,607
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,108,607
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        106,299


</TABLE>
#### Oddo Asset Management, Appellant, v Barclays Bank PLC et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Submitted August 13, 2012;

decided October 23, 2012

Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*19 NY3d 584 (2012)].
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-30861

JAMES NEAL, Plaintiff-Appellant

v. NABORS DRILLING USA, L.P.,

Defendant-Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:11-CV-648

Before DAVIS, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Neal appeals from an August 15, 2011 ord er by the dist ri c t c o urt. In its memorandum ruling issued w i th the order, the district court compelled arbitration pursuant to Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 3. The order itself explained what was to occur with the lawsuit thereafter: [T]he Clerk of this Court is to administratively terminate this action in his records, without prejudice to the right of the parties to move to reopen the proceedi n g s within thirty (30) days of the date the Arbitrator renders a decision in this matter. This order shall not be U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D July 3, 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the Court has det erm ined that this opi nion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-30861 Document: 00511909680 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2012No. 11-30861

considered a dismissal or di s p o sition of this matter, and should further proceedings in it become necessary or desirable, any party m ay initiate it in the same manner as if the order had no t b e e n entered.
Thi s c a s e still exists on the district court’s docket and may be reopened upon request of the parties or on the court’s own motion. The court’s order was the functional equivalent of a stay, not a dismissal, and there has thus not been

an appealable order. See 9 U.S.C. § 16(b)(1 ); Green Tree Fin. Corp.–Ala. v. Randolph , 531 U.S. 79, 87 n.2 (2000); Mire v. Full Spectrum Lending, Inc. , 389 F.3d 163, 167 (5th Cir. 2004). DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

2 Case: 11-30861 Document: 00511909680 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/03/2012
Exhibit 21  List of Subsidiaries

      The subsidiaries of Barnwell Industries, Inc., at September 30, 1998 were:

                                                  Percentage    Jurisdiction of
Name of Subsidiary                               of Ownership    Incorporation
                                                 ------------   ---------------

Barnwell of Canada, Limited                           100%      Delaware
Barnwell Hawaiian Properties, Inc.                    100%      Delaware
Water Resources International, Inc.                   100%      Delaware
Barnwell Management Co., Inc.                         100%      Delaware
Barnwell Shallow Oil, Inc.                            100%      Delaware
Barnwell Geothermal Corporation                       100%      Delaware
Barnwell Mining Co.                                   100%      Delaware
Barnwell Overseas, Inc.                               100%      Delaware
Geothermal Exploration and Development Corp.          100%      Delaware
Victoria Properties, Inc.                             100%      Delaware
Barnwell Financial Corporation                        100%      Delaware
NDTX, Inc.                                            100%      Delaware
Barnwell Investment Corporation                       100%      Hawaii
Barnwell Kona Corporation                             100%      Hawaii
WRI Properties, Inc.                                  100%      Hawaii
Barnwell Israel, Ltd.                                 100%      Israel
Barnwell Oil & Gas, Ltd.                              100%      Israel
Bill Robbins Drilling, Ltd.                           100%      Alberta, Canada
Gypsy Petroleums Ltd.                                 100%      Alberta, Canada
Dartmouth Petroleum, Ltd.                             100%      Alberta, Canada
J.H. Wilson Associates, Ltd.                          100%      Alberta, Canada
December 15, 2011



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT , Appellant

NO. 14

- 10

- 01040

- CV V.

GREAT AMERICAN INSUR ANCE COMPANY , Appellee

____________________ This cause, an appeal from the order in favor of appellee, GREAT AMERICAN
INSURANCE COMPANY , signed October 1, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the
record. For the reasons stated in this court’s opinion, we reverse the trial court’s order denying appe llant HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ’s second plea to the jurisdiction to the extent that the trial court refused to dismiss (1) appellee’s equitable

- subrogation claim in which it seeks recovery beyond what appellant owes
under the Handex Contract , a s that term is defined in this court’s opinion, and (2) appellee’s waste claim based upon appellant’s allegedly negligent or wrongful conduct.
W e remand to the trial court with instructions to dismiss these two claims for lack of subject

- matter jurisdiction. We affirm the remainder of the trial court’s order. For good cause, we order both appellant and appellee to pay one

- half of all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
RFCE.VEDlN , ; Thi -Lsrt ofAppeals Sixth District M 0 (02015 

### "exr.-*ana. Tsxas Y&, (Dk'lM- DOO&5-CV Debra Autrey, Clerk FILED !N TheCourtofAppeate Sixth District 

### FEB 0 6 2015 Texarkana, Texas DebraK. Autrey, Clerk 

## Julio fejte.Z)Jt.7 $ XAl THE C£>uRt Of APPEALS VS. roe 

## T.T>C.J.T Qi.oJ. # TH£ Sl*TW Ttt&TKfiCT 

# A?P£LLftfjrg> Morton Iro obj ect to -rue H0U0RA6LE JusrjL£B of-me sixtw qiurt of AfPeaeSf

I . 

# t& fc^ooJlta^i S&lsuKy WoaixAj2isa_ u\ VW_ -Wl*>\ leuj

I. ,X:

# Rajrkx- U Claris KsLGzmi l"C&) ok lOvOo-nH. (Wjtaa_

f^\4£R, 

## \A\-UGRE.fffR£; F&£ nurses VW_ £uV£_

### ousvtfu^ Vru^Vusti.
X«^L*& di*tt feral, .Ic*ff53734 C£RtxfXCAT£ CTC- <£(LUdX£ 

## cjour^ ra^Vum Vte£ boon t^ru^ ifeh CLUtrfc 'bzjpt* KvAuVr^y^

i»
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Michael S. Herring, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Omniture, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e))for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  May 15, 2007 /s/ Michael S. Herring   Michael S. Herring   Chief Financial Officer and Executive VicePresident(Principal Financial Officer)
Amendment #3 To 


 


DEBT CONVERSION AGREEMENT


 


This Agreement (the “Amendment Agreement”) is an
amendment to the Debt Conversion Agreement dated the 27th day of March, 2013 (“Conversion Agreement”), by
and between PAUL J. TRAVERS ("Holder"), and VUZIX CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Company").


 


In consideration of the mutual covenants
and agreements contained herein and in the Debt Conversion Agreement, the parties agree to amend the Conversion Agreement effective
immediately as follows:


 


1.          Paragraph
6 (a) of the Conversion Agreement currently provides that:


 


6 (a) At the option of any party in the event that
the Debt Conversion has not occurred by June 30, 2013 and such delay was not as a result of any breach of this Agreement by the
terminating party;


 


The Conversion Agreement Paragraph 6 (a) is hereby
amended to state:


 


6 (a) At the option of any party in the event that
the Debt Conversion has not occurred by August 31 2013 and such delay was not as a result of any breach of this Agreement
by the terminating party;


 


2.          All
provisions and terms making reference to or subject to the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSXV”) shall be deleted
and removed from the Conversion Agreement and any amendments there to.


 


3.          All
other provisions and terms of the Conversion Agreement and any amendments thereto shall remain the in effect in accordance with
their original terms.


 


EXECUTED on this 26h day of July 2013.


 


	Company:        Vuzix Corporation	Holder: Paul J. Travers
	 	 
	By: /s/ Grant Russell	By:  /s/ Paul J. Travers
	 	 
	Name:  Grant Russell	Name:  Paul J. Travers
	Title:  CFO	Title: President & CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000826345
<NAME> GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-B
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         481,884
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  611,782
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,093,666
<PP&E>                                      22,219,786
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,872,143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,601,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,013
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,411,201
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,601,412
<SALES>                                      2,059,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,119,852
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,659,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                459,899
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            459,899
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   459,899
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
97-41.

#### State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Plunkett.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of respondent’s answer, motion for leave to intervene by Carl Wilkenfeld, James R. Jump and Mary V. Fellabaum, and answer of intervening respondents,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to intervene be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Cook, J., would deny the motion for leave to intervene.