alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 11

               SYBRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                         December 31,
                                                         1996      1995
                                                         ----      ---- 
        <S>                                             <C>      <C>
        Primary:
        Net income ........................             $15,403  $11,722
                                                         ======   ======


         Shares
          Weighted average Common shares ..              46,980   46,552
          Common equivalent shares ........               1,641      930
                                                         ------   ------
                                                         48,621   47,482
                                                         ======   ======

          Primary earnings per share ......             $   .32  $   .25
                                                         ======   ======
</TABLE>



                                       20
**Exhibit No. 31.2**

** **

**SECTION302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Russell M. Gifford,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-KSB of Barnwell Industries, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The small businessissuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

 

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.               Thesmall business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thesmall business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small businessissuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.

 
| Date:  | December 22, 2004       |   | /s/ Russell M.  Gifford |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Russell M. Gifford      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.2

ITRONICS INC.

Certificationof Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act

 

 

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael C. Horsley, Controller of ITRONICS INC., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ITRONICS INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

> 
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls    and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this    report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and    procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the    disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report    based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control    over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent    fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,    the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

37

----

> 
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of    internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect    the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial    information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who    have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial    reporting.

 

Date: May 14, 2007                         /S/MICHAEL C. HORSLEY
                                           MichaelC. Horsley

                                           Controller

38
Exhibit 32.1  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/S/ Brenda G. GujralName:Brenda G. GujralTitle:President of the General Partner andPrincipal Executive Officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.PDate:July 27, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6759

FREEMAN CARVER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK; JIM CAUBLE, Superintendent,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-00-96-2-MU)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Freeman Carver, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Freeman Carver seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See Carver v. Beck, No. CA-00-96-2-MU (W.D.N.C.

May 8, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
KEITH LITCHFIELD, Petitioner

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD, Respondent

______________________

2017

- 2165

______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT

- 1221

- 15

- 0621 -W- 1.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

L EON A LAN B LAIS , Law Office of Leon Alan Blais, Port Charlotte, FL, argued for petitioner.

K ATRINA L EDERER , Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by K ATHERINE M. S MITH
, J EFFREY G AUGER

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE
, D YK
, and H UGHES
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 4, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------



                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathon M. Singer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

i.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



                              /s/ Jonathon M. Singer
                              ----------------------------------------
                              Jonathon M. Singer
                              Chief Financial Officer



May 6, 2011
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-F  ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 14th day of August, 2006.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-F
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-F and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-F and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,470
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,442)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          98,525
<DEPRECIATION>                                (70,303)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,441
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         18,540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,441
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,396
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,426
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (364)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,251
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,251
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,251
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32(b)**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, E. Follin Smith, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,and Chief Administrative Officer of Constellation Energy Group, Inc.,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(i)     The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)    Theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Constellation Energy Group, Inc.
| /s/ E. FOLLIN SMITH                                                                                  |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| E. Follin Smith  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative  Officer |   |

 

Date: February 27,2007

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwina Arlethia BURNETT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-6616.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 15, 2006.

Decided: June 21, 2006.

Edwina Arlethia Burnett, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Edwina Arlethia Burnett seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burnett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
[Cite as State ex rel. Nelson v. Astrab , 2011-Ohio-5838.] 

# Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97338



## STATE OF OHIO, EX REL., J. C. NELSON

RELATOR

vs. 

## MICHAEL ASTRAB, JUDGE

RESPONDENT



### JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED

Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 448615 Order No. 448942 RELEASE DATE: November 8, 2011 2


ATTORNEY FOR RELATOR J. C. Nelson, pro se Inmate #A-491-417 Grafton Correctional Institution 1800 S. Avon-Belden Road Grafton, Ohio 44044

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT William D. Mason Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor 8th Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J.: {¶ 1} J.C. Nelson has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Nelson seeks an order from this court that requires Judge Michael Astrab to render a ruling with regard to a motion for jail-time credit as filed in State v. Nelson , Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-466734. 1 Judge Astrab has filed a motion for summary judgment, which is granted for the following reason.

1 Pursuant to Civ.R. 25(D)(1), Judge Mich ael Astrab is substituted for the judge that was originally assigned to the underlying case. 3

 {¶ 2} Attached to Judge Astrab ’ s motion for summary judgment is a copy of a judgment entry, as journalized on October 14, 2011, which granted Nelson ’ s motion for jail-time credit in the amount of 77 days. Nelson ’ s request for a writ of mandamus is moot. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas , 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723; State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163. In addition, any error associated with the calculation of jail-time credit must be addressed through an appeal. State ex rel. Britton v. Foley-Jones (Mar. 5, 1998), Cuyahoga App. No. 73646; State ex rel. Spates v. Sweeney (Apr. 17, 1997), Cuyahoga App. No. 71986. {¶ 3} Accordingly, we grant Judge Astrab ’ s motion for summary judgment. Costs awarded to Nelson; costs waived. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Eighth District Court of Appeals serve notice of this judgment upon all parties as required by Civ.R. 58(B). Writ denied.

__________________________________________ EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, JUDGE MARY J. BOYLE, P.J., and FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J., CONCUR
September 14, 2021

Via E-Mail

Jody Cummings, General Counsel

Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation

2 Matt’s Path

Mashantucket, CT 06338-3060

Re: Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation Gaming Ordinance Amendments, 

 Resolution No. TCR080521-02 of 02 

Dear Mr. Cummings:

This letter responds to your request on behalf of the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal 

Nation for the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) to review and approve the 

Tribe’s amendments to its gaming ordinance. The amendments were adopted by the 

Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Council in Resolution TCR080521-02 of 02. The 

amendments execute a revised Gaming Ordinance intended to update certain provisions 

to more clearly align with NIGC regulations.

These amendments are approved as they are consistent with the requirements of the 

Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and NIGC regulations. If you have any questions or 

require anything further, please contact Staff Attorney Mary Modrich-Alvarado at (202) 

632-7003.

Sincerely,

 E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

 Chairman 

CC: 

Rodney Butler (RodneyButler@mptn-nsn.gov)

Marietta Anderson (MAnderson@mptn-nsn.gov)

Betsy Conway (bconway@mptn-nsn.gov)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000850506
<NAME>                         GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP II-F

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                            293,845
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     316,944
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  610,789
<PP&E>                         11,010,638
<DEPRECIATION>                  9,283,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,372,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              31,648
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                      2,318,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,372,313
<SALES>                           507,658
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  519,367
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     244,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   274,730
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               274,730
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      274,730
<EPS-BASIC>                          1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0



</TABLE>