alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM OROAMERICA,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT APRIL 30, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED APRIL 30, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          22,636
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,420
<INVENTORY>                                     12,636
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,565
<PP&E>                                          26,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,254
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,169
<SALES>                                         39,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,277
<CGS>                                           30,497
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   165
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 295
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    742
<INCOME-TAX>                                       297
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                445
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       445
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral Partner.By:/s/ Donna UrbainName:Donna UrbainTitle:Principal Financial Officer with respect to Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.Date:November 6, 2008
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF BRUCE L. DOWNEY PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Bruce L. Downey, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Barr
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 23, 2004 /s/ Bruce L. DowneyBruce L. DowneyChief Executive Officer
 EX-3
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14070]



[[Page 28558]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,045A]


Parkdale Mills, Inc., Plant <greek-i>40, Graniteville, South 
Carolina; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on April 6, 2009, applicable to workers of 
Parkdale Mills, Inc., Plant <greek-i>40, Graniteville, South Carolina 
(TA-W-65,045A). The notice will soon be published in the Federal 
Register.
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers produce 
yarn.
    The review shows that all workers of Parkdale Mills, Inc., Plant 
<greek-i>40, Graniteville, South Carolina, were previously certified 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under petition number TA-W-
60,796, which expired on March 21, 2009.
    Therefore, in order to avoid an overlap in worker group coverage, 
the Department is amending the January 26, 2008 impact date established 
for TA-W-65,045A, to read March 22, 2009.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-65,045A is hereby issued as 
follows:

``All workers of Parkdale Mills, Inc., Plant <greek-i>40, 
Graniteville, South Carolina, who became totally separated from 
employment on March 22, 2009 through April 6, 2011, are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 
of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade 
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of April 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-14070 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

September 15 , 20 20
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO S
. 14

- 20

- 00594

- CR and 14

- 20

- 0059 5

- CR

IN RE MIGUEL SAENZ , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 405th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 14CR3080 and 14CR3117


### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 31, 2020 , relator Miguel Saenz filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( West Supp. 2017 ); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator ask s this c ourt to (1) compel the Honorable Jared Robinson , presiding judge of the 405th District Court of Galveston County , to rule on various motions relator alleges he has filed , an d to issue updated Findings of Fact and Conclusions of L aw , and (2) compel John D.2

Kinard, the District Clerk for Galveston County , to file documents that are allegedly missing into the record for trial court cause numbers 14CR3080 and 14CR3117 . It is evident from relator’s petition that the matters for which he seeks relief all relate to applications for writ of habeas corpus that relato r has filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. 1 We have no jurisdiction to grant the relief with respect to relator’s article 11.07 applications for writ of habeas corpus

. See Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist ., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117

– 18 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (indicating that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction when an article 11.07 application is pending). We have no authority to issue writ s of mandamus in criminal law matters pertaining to proceedings under article 11.07. In re McAfee , 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Should an applicant find it necessary to complain about the processing of applicat ion for writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or about an action or inaction of the convicting court , the applicant may seek mandamus relief from the Court of Criminal Appeals. See Benson v. Dist. Clerk , 331 S.W.3d 431 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) ; In re McAfee , 53 S.W.3d at 718

. Further, t his court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over district clerks unless it is shown that issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(a ), (b) (Supp.); In re Smith , 263 S.W.3d 93, 95 (Tex. App.

– Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding). Relator has not shown that

1 Relator’s petition states that the Court of Criminal Appeals has dismissed his applications for writ of habeas corpus, but that he has filed motions for rehearing , to reinstate, and for en banc hearing

.3

the issuance of a writ against the district clerk, John D. Kinard, is necessary to enforce this court ’ s jurisdiction.
For these reasons , we dismiss relator’s petition for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Bourliot

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6316

JACOB LEON MITCHELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

S. K. YOUNG, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-05-24-1)

Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: June 30, 2005

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jacob Leon Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jacob Leon Mitchell, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his

petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) for failure to exhaust

state remedies. The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack

v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676,

683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Mitchell has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.7
 Summary of Compensation Arrangements with Directors
 2010 Fiscal Year
 
 For the 2010 fiscal year, the independent directors of the Board determined that each of the Company’s directors would receive a cash retainer fee for his service, paid quarterly. The total cash retainer paid to each director was as follows:
 
 Director Name

Cash Retainer during Fiscal Year 2010J. Ward McConnell, Jr.

Executive Chairman of the Board

$
150,000Marc H. McConnell

Executive Vice Chairman of the Board

$
58,000Thomas E. Buffamante

$
30,000David R. Castle

$
30,000Fred W. Krahmer

$
30,000James Lynch

$
30,000Douglas McClellan

$
30,000
 
 The Company also reimburses directors for out-of-pocket expenses related to their attendance at board meetings and performance of other services as Board members.
 
 In addition, the independent directors of the Board determined that the Executive Chairman of the Board and Executive Vice Chairman of the Board would be eligible for discretionary cash bonuses following fiscal year end, based on Company performance and services rendered during the fiscal year, and in accordance with a recommendation by independent directors.
 
 Further, pursuant to the Company’s 2007 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, each director is automatically granted non-qualified stock options to purchase 2,000 (post-split) shares of the Company’s common stock on the date of the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The options have a five-year term and were immediately exercisable at a price equal to the grant-date fair value.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-64,979]

                    By application dated April 18, 2009, the petitioners requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment                           ( print page 28552)                        Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on March 4, 2009. The Notice of Determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 19, 2009 (74 FR 11760).                

The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the finding that imports of filtration media did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm. The investigation also revealed that the subject firm did not shift production of filtration media to a foreign country during the relevant period.

In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleged that the workers of the subject firm also produced non-filtration products. The petitioner also alleged that the subject firm shifted production of non-filtration products abroad and also increased imports of non-filtration products during the relevant period.

The Department carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

## Conclusion

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of May 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-14069 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Union Security Insurance Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John S. Roberts, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 7, 2008



/s/    John S. RobertsJohn S. Roberts Interim President and Chief Executive
Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1504

RONNIE T. SHELTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Social Security Administration; 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Disability Services; 

DISABILITY DETERMINATION SERVICES; SHARON L. GOTTOVI, 

Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Rehabilitative 

Services, Disability Determination Services; BARRY LAWLOR, 

Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Rehabilitative 

Services, Disability Determination Services,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

PEGGY CARTER, Social Security, Office of Disability 

Adjudication and Review; WINNIE J. WHITING, Social Security, 

Office of Disability Adjudication and Review,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, 

District Judge. (5:12-cv-00009-MFU-JGW)

Submitted: September 27, 2013 Decided: October 4, 2013

Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Ronnie T. Shelton, Appellant Pro Se. Kartic Padmanabhan, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia; Erin Laura 

Barrett, Pamela Brown Beckner, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie T. Shelton appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing Shelton’s civil complaint in part, and granting the 

Commissioner’s motion to remand. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Shelton v. Astrue, No. 

5:12-cv-00009-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. filed Feb. 15, 2013; entered 

Feb. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Spherix Incorporated**

 

----

 

**Certification of**

**Chief FinancialOfficer**

**Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Robert L. Clayton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofSpherix Incorporated (the “Company”), in compliance with Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of myknowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2009 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

 

·                  Fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

·                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert L. Clayton                 |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Robert L. Clayton                     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|   | March 30, 2010                   |

 

A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Spherix Incorporated and will be retained by SpherixIncorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----