alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,433]

                    By application dated April 25, 2009, the petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on April 6, 2009. The Notice of Determination will be soon published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the finding that imports of two-piece automotive wheels did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm. The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not shift production of two-piece automotive wheels to a foreign country during the relevant period.

In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleged that the workers of the subject also supported production of one piece and cast wheels. The petitioner also alleged that the subject firm shifted production to China and that there was an increase in imports of one piece and cast wheels from China.

The Department carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

## Conclusion

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of May 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-14072 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been revoked pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515, effective on the corresponding date shown below: 

*License Number:*                     020488N.                 

*Name:*                     Cycle Logical Supply Chain Solutions, LLC.                 

*Address:*                     8014 Cumming Hwy., Ste 403-362, Canton, GA 30115.                 

*Date Revoked:*                     May 17, 2009.                 

*Reason:*                     Failed to maintain a valid bond.                 

Sandra L. Kusumoto, 

Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.

[FR Doc. E9-14160 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### In the Matter of Jeffrey Baker, Respondent, v Poughkeepsie City School District et al., Appellants.

Submitted April 30, 2012;

decided June 26, 2012

Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*18 NY3d 714 (2012)].
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4306

_____________________________
R ICHARD W HITSITT , Appellant,

v.

W ILLIAM A. L EONARD , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. James B. Fensom , Judge

. May 30, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , M AKAR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 William H. McLean, McLean Law, P.A., Panama City
, for Appellant.

Jeffrey P. Whitton and Max W. McCord, III, Panama City
, for Appellee.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14071]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,088]


Snoke Special Products Co., Inc. Including On-Site Leased Workers 
From 1st Choice Personnel and East Texas Staffing Jacksonville, TX; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 USC 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on February 12, 2009, applicable to workers of 
Snoke Special Products Co., Inc., including on-site leased workers from 
1st Choice Personnel, Jacksonville, Texas. The notice was published in 
the Federal Register on March 3, 2009 (74 FR 9278).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of copper tubing components for air conditioners.
    New information shows that some workers separated from employment 
at the subject firm had their wages reported under a separate 
unemployment insurance (UI) tax account for East Texas Staffing, the 
parent company of 1st Choice Personnel.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Snoke Special Products Co., Inc., Jacksonville, Texas, who 
were secondarily affected as a supplier of copper tubing components for 
air conditioners to a trade certified firm.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-65,088 is hereby issued as 
follows:

``All workers of Snoke Special Products Co., Inc. including on-site 
leased workers from 1st Choice Personnel and East Texas Staffing, 
Jacksonville, Texas, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after February 2, 2008 through February 12, 2011, 
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of 
the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for 
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of May 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-14071 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14251]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Guidance for the High-Speed Rail/Intercity Passenger Rail Grant 
Program

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Announcement of availability of guidance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 17, 2009, FRA intends to issue guidance for the High-
Speed Rail (HSR)/Intercity Passenger Rail (IPR) Grant Program. FRA will 
post this guidance on its Web site at: http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/2243. Subsequently, FRA will publish this guidance in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding the 
guidance document and grant program, please contact the FRA HSR/IPR 
Program Manager via e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d594878794fb87b4bcb995b1baa1fbb2baa3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="02435050432c50636b6e42666d762c656d74">[email protected]</span></a>, or by mail: Office of 
Passenger and Freight Programs, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue, MS-20, SE., Washington, DC, 20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The guidance document and additional 
information about the HSR/IPR Grant Program are available on FRA's 
public Web site at: http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/2243. This 
Program builds upon the President's ``Vision for High-Speed Rail in 
America,'' which was issued on April 16, 2009, and which describes a 
collaborative effort among the Federal Government, States, railroads 
and other key stakeholders to help transform America's transportation 
system by investing in an efficient, high-speed passenger rail network 
of 100 to 600 mile intercity corridors. The guidance document details 
HSR/IPR Grant Program funding opportunities as well as specific 
application requirements and procedures. The funds are being made 
available under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 
(ARRA) and the Department of Transportation Appropriations Acts of 
fiscal years 2008 and 2009. ARRA requires the Secretary of 
Transportation to issue interim guidance to applicants within 120 days 
of enactment. In addition to being available on the FRA's Web site, the 
guidance will be published in the Federal Register at a later date.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 12, 2009.
Paul Nissenbaum,
Director, Office of Passenger and Freight Programs.
[FR Doc. E9-14251 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7802

ALFRED MILTON RIVERA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN BLEDSOE, United States Penitentiary -

Lee,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (CA-05-638-7)

Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 4, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred Milton Rivera, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*To the extent Rivera may be seeking authorization under 28

U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second and successive 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000) motion, such a motion should be filed in the circuit

in which he was sentenced.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Alfred Milton Rivera, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order that construed his petition he labeled as

filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)

motion and dismissed it as successive. An appeal may not be taken

from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both

that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims

is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the

district court are also debatable or wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rivera has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.*

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual report of LipidViro Tech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Kenneth Hamik, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date:March 30, 2009By:/s/Kenneth HamikKenneth Hamik, President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,964
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,964
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,950
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,250
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,236)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (1,986)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,121)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,121)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7063

JAMIE NEIL CAPALBO

,

Petitioner

- Appellant

,

v.

B. M. ANTONELLI

, Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv

- 01946

- TMC )

Submitted : December 18, 2020 Decided: December 31, 2020

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Jamie Neil Capalbo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Jamie Neil Capalbo, a federal prisoner, appeals the distric t court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Capalbo’s 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 petition in which Capalbo sought to challenge his sentence and one of his

convictions by way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255. P ursuant to § 2255(e), a

prisoner may challenge his conviction and sentence in a traditional writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to § 2241 if a § 2255 motion would be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality

of his detention.

[Section] 2255 is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of a sentence when: (1) at the time of sentencing, settled law of this circuit or the Supreme Court established the legality of the sentence; (2) subsequent to the prisoner’s direct appeal and first § 2255 motion, the aforementioned settled substantive law changed and was deemed to apply retroactively on collateral review; (3) the prisoner is unable to meet the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255(h)(2) for second or successive motions; and (4) due to this retro active change, the sentence now presents an error sufficiently grave to be deemed a fundamental defect.

United States v. Wheeler , 886 F.3d 415, 429 (4th Cir. 2018). In addition,

[Section] 2255 is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of a conviction when: (1) at the time of conviction, settled law of this circuit or the Supreme Court established the legality of the conviction; (2) subsequent to the prisoner’s direct appeal and first § 2255 motion, the substantive law changed such that the conduct of which the prisoner was convicted is deemed not to be criminal; and (3) the prisoner cannot satisfy the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255 because the new rule is not one of constitutional law.

In re Jones , 226 F.3d 328, 333

- 34 (4th Cir. 2000).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Capalbo v. Antonelli , No

. 1:19

- cv

- 01946

- TMC

(D.S.C. J une 2 9 , 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                     Exhibit 12(a)

                          Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
          Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and
    Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends



                                                              1998     1999     2000     2001     2002
<S>                                                         <C>       <C>     <C>      <C>      <C>
Fixed charges, as defined:
  Total Interest Charges                                     $96,685  $97,023 $101,600 $109,523 $103,210
  Interest applicable to rentals                              15,511   17,289   16,449   14,563   12,762
                                                            --------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges, as defined                              112,196  114,312  118,049  124,086  115,972

Preferred dividends, as defined (a)                           16,763   17,836   13,479   12,348   11,869
                                                            --------------------------------------------

Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined  $128,959 $132,148 $131,528 $136,434 $127,841
                                                            ============================================
Earnings as defined:

  Net Income                                                $110,951  $69,313 $137,047 $178,185 $135,643
  Add:
    Provision for income taxes:
       Total                                                  71,374   54,012  100,512  105,933   71,404
    Fixed charges as above                                   112,196  114,312  118,049  124,086  115,972
                                                            --------------------------------------------

Total earnings, as defined                                  $294,521 $237,637 $355,608 $408,204 $323,019
                                                            ============================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined                  2.63     2.08     3.01     3.29     2.79
                                                            ============================================

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
 preferred dividends, as defined                                2.28     1.80     2.70     2.99     2.53
                                                            ============================================


------------------------
(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by
    dividing the preferred dividend requirement by one hundred percent (100%)
    minus the income tax rate.

</TABLE>