alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Balchem Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Francis J.
Fitzpatrick, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Francis J. FitzpatrickFrancis
      J. FitzpatrickChief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal
      Financial and PrincipalAccounting
      Officer)March
      12, 2010





This
certification accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-K pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.







71
[973 NYS2d 566]

#### In the Matter of James W. Miskowski (Admitted as James William Miskowski), an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

October 23, 2013

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Gary L. Casella,*White Plains *(Antonia Cipollone*of counsel), for petitioner.

*89OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

By corrected order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated March 8, 2011 (205 NJ 265, 14 A3d 1288 [2011]), the respondent was reprimanded in New Jersey based on his violation of rule 1.15 (a) of the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct (hereinafter the RPC) for failing to safeguard client funds, as well as rule 1.15 (d) of the RPC and rule 1:21-6 of the New Jersey Court Rules for record-keeping violations.

A notice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3 was served upon the respondent, by mail, on January 17, 2013, affording him an opportunity to file a verified statement setting forth any of the defenses enumerated under 22 NYCRR 691.3 (c) and a written demand for a hearing, and advising him that if he did not file a verified statement and request a hearing, this Court would impose such discipline or take such disciplinary action as it deemed appropriate *(see*22 NYCRR 691.3 [b]).

Inasmuch as the respondent has not filed a verified statement setting forth any of the defenses to the imposition of discipline enumerated in 22 NYCRR 691.3 (c) or a request for a hearing, there is no impediment to the imposition of reciprocal discipline.

Under the totality of the circumstances, the respondent is publicly censured in New York.

Eng, PJ, Mastro, Rivera, Skelos and Roman, JJ, concur.

Ordered that the petitioner’s application to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3 is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3, the respondent, James W Miskowski, admitted as James William Miskowski, is publicly censured for his professional misconduct.
Exhibit 12(f)Entergy New Orleans, Inc.Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges andRatios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends2001
2002
2003
2004
2005Fixed charges, as defined:Total Interest
$19,661
$27,950
$17,786
$16,610
$13,555Interest applicable to rentals
977
1,043
910
644
426Total fixed charges, as defined
20,638
28,993
18,696
17,254
13,981Preferred dividends, as defined (a)
2,898
2,736
1,686
1,545
1,172Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined
$23,536
$31,729
$20,382
$18,799
$15,153Earnings as defined:Net Income
($2,195)
($230)
$7,859
$28,072
$1,250Add:Provision for income taxes:Total
(4,396)
(422)
5,875
16,868
1,790Fixed charges as above
20,638
28,993
18,696
17,254
13,981Total earnings, as defined
$14,047
$28,341
$32,430
$62,194
$17,021Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined
0.68
0.98
1.73
3.60
1.22Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges andpreferred dividends, as defined
0.60
0.89
1.59
3.31
1.12------------------------(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by dividing the preferred dividend
      requirement by one hundred percent (100%) minus the income tax rate.(b)  For Entergy New Orleans, earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001 were not adequate to cover fixed charges and combined fixed charges and preferred dividends by $6.6 million and $9.5 million, respectively.(c)  For Entergy New Orleans, earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 were not adequate to cover combined fixed charges and preferred dividends by $0.7 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
Exhibit 31.3**CERTIFICATION**I, Jack E. Davis, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Arizona Public Service Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 

 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:March 10, 2006.     /s/  Jack E. Davis     Jack E. Davis  President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,027
<SECURITIES>                                     6,043
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,846
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,356
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         135,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,896
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,176
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,052)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,052)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,052)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Felix Hernandez, Appellant.

Submitted November 13, 2012;

decided November 19, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., The Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3384 

To direct the General Accountability Office to conduct a full audit of hurricane protection funding and cost estimates associated with post-Katrina 

hurricane protection. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2010 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the General Accountability Office to conduct a 

full audit of hurricane protection funding and cost estimates associated with post-Katrina hurricane protection. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUDIT OF HURRICANE PROTECTION FUNDING 

4 AND COST ESTIMATES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the 

6 date of enactment of this Act, the Government Account7 ability Office, in coordination with the National Academy 

8 of Engineering, shall conduct and submit to Congress a 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3384 IS

1 full audit of hurricane protection funding and cost esti2 mates associated with post-Katrina hurricane protection. 

3 (b) PURPOSES.—The purposes of the audit shall be— 

4 (1) to identify the causes for the extraordinary 

5 miscalculations in cost estimates of damage caused 

6 by Hurricane Katrina that were completed before 

7 the date of enactment of this Act; 

8 (2) to conduct an analysis of resources available 

9 and work required with respect to hurricane protec10 tion funding and post-Katrina hurricane protection; 

11 and 

12 (3) to identify strategies to replenish repro13 grammed funding from out-year work to immediate 

14 needs. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1471

MUMFORD & MILLER CONCRETE, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

Pete Geren, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY,

Appellee.

William D. Auxer , Kaplin Stewart Meloff Reiter & Stein, PC, of Blue Bell,

Pennsylvania, argued for appellant.

Bryant G. Snee , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigat ion Branch, Civil Division United

States Department of Justic e, of Washington, DC, argued fo r the appellee. On the brief

were Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, Mark A. Melnick , Assistant Director, and A. Bondurant

Eley , Trial Attorney.

Appealed from: Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

Administrative Judge M onroe E. Freeman, Jr.

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1471

MUMFORD & MILLER CONCRETE, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

Pete Geren, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY,

Appellee.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the Armed Servic es Board of Contract Appeals

in CASE NO(S). 53652 and 53653

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED March 14, 2008 /s/ Jan H orbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
FORM 10-Q--QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the period ended June 30, 2001

or

[  ]  Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ___________

 

Commission File Number: 33-18089-A

 

HICKORY LENDERS, LTD.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G.
Patrick Corydon, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ G. PATRICK CORYDON
-------------------------
G. Patrick Corydon
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
March 14, 2006
Kathryn L. Tierney, Attorney 

Bay Mills Indian Community 

12 140 West Lake Shore Drive 

Brimley, Michigan 497 15 

Dear Ms. Tierney: 

This letter responds to your request to review and approve the amendment to the Gaming 

Commission's Rule #12: Restrictions on Gaming Activity by Employees of Gaming 

Facilities. The amendment to the rule was adopted by the Community on November 8, 

1999. This letter constitutes approval under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA). 

Thank you for submitting the amendment to the tribal gaming ordinance of the 

Bay Mills Indian Community for review and approval. The National Indian Gaming 

Commission staff and I to look forward to worlung with you and the Community in 

implementing the IGRA. If you have any questions or require further assistance, please 

contact Ms. Frances Fragua at 2021632-7003. 

Sincerely yours, 

Montie R. Deer 

Chairman 

1441 L !jlREET, N.W. 9TH FLOOR WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 EL: 202632-7003 FAX: 202-632-7066 
BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY 

GAMING COMMISSION RULES 

RULE 72: RESTRICTIONS ON GAMING ACTIVITY BY EMPLOYEES OF 

GAMING FA CIL /TIES 

(a) Slot Machine Gaming Prohibited. No person holding 

one of the following positions, or their equivalent, at a 

gaming facility licensed by the Commission shall engage in 

any gaming activity at any such licensed facility: 

(1) General Manager of Casino Operations. 

(2) Assistant Manager/ Head Shift Manager. 

(3) Director of Surveillance. 

(4) Surveillance staf . 

(5) Slot Technician. 

(6) Slot Attendant. 

(7) Slot Manager. 

(8) Key employee or primary management official who 

is on duty or in uniform. 

(9) Any employee with access to the Smart System. 

(b) Table Games Prohibited. No key employee or primary 

management official will be permitted to play table games 

at any time. 

(c) Penalty for Violation. Any person subject to this 

Rule shall be subject to license suspension or termination 

by the Gaming Commission under sec. 6.8 (A) (8) of the 

Gaming Ordinance. 

CERTIFICATION 

This is to certify that the above Gaming Commission Rule #12, as amended, has 

been reviewed and approved at a meetin of the Bay Mills Executive Council held at 

- - 

Bay Mills, Michigan, on the 8th day o B November, 1999, with a vote of 3 for, 

-- 0 opposed, 1 absent, and 1 abstaining. The President must abstainexcept in Ke event of ZiiE 

Amended 11-8-99
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

__________________________________________________________________ No. DA 21 - 0215 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. BRUCE ALAN GARAY , Defendant and Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________ **ORDER**

__________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED tha t Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 21, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s reply brief on appeal. No further extensions will be granted. 11/07/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0215[Type here] Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 7 2022
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3448 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3448

  To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to permit 
   certain service institutions in all States to provide year-round 
                               services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 27 (legislative day, May 26), 2010

 Mr. Udall of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 
                                Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to permit 
   certain service institutions in all States to provide year-round 
                               services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring All Students Year-round 
(EASY) Access to Meals and Snacks Act''.

SEC. 2. YEAR-ROUND SERVICES FOR ELIGIBLE ENTITIES.

    Section 13(a) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1761(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following--
            ``(11) Year-round option.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Except as provided in 
                subparagraph (B), a service institution that is 
                described in paragraph (6) (excluding a public school), 
                or a private nonprofit organization described in 
                paragraph (7), shall be eligible for the program under 
                the same terms and conditions as other service 
                institutions.
                    ``(B) Reimbursement exception.--A service 
                institution described in subparagraph (A), in addition 
                to being eligible for reimbursement for meals described 
                in subsection (b)(2) served during each day of 
                operation during the periods described in subsection 
                (c)(1), may be reimbursed for up to 1 meal and 1 snack 
                per child served during each day of operation during--
                            ``(i) after school hours;
                            ``(ii) weekends; and
                            ``(iii) school holidays during the regular 
                        school calendar.''.

SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.

    Section 18 of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 
U.S.C. 1769) is amended by striking subsection (h).
                                 <all>
```
#### Jeana Barenboim et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v Starbucks Corporation, Respondent. Eugene Winans et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v Starbucks Corporation, Respondent.

Submitted April 29, 2013;

decided May 2, 2013

*920Motion by the New York City Hospitality Alliance for leave to appear amicus curiae on consideration of the certified questions herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and nine copies filed within seven days.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (09-052)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

# SUMMARY:

Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

# DATES:

June 16, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bryan A. Geurts, Patent Counsel, Goddard Space Flight Center, Mail Code 140.1, Greenbelt, MD 20771-0001; telephone (301) 286-7351; fax (301) 286-9502.

*NASA Case No. GSC-15421-1:*                         Spring Joint with Overstrain Sensor;                    

*NASA Case No. GSC-15557-1:*                         System and Method for Embedding Emotion in Logic Systems;                    

*NASA Case No. GSC-15458-1:*                         System and Method for Transferring Telemetry Data Between a Ground Station and a Control Center;                    

*NASA Case No. GSC-15001-1:*                         Apparatus and Method for a Light Direction Sensor.                    

Dated: June 10, 2009.

Richard W. Sherman,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. E9-14055 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P