# Patent

## Title
Personal cleansing composition

## Abstract

Disclosed are water-based personal cleansing compositions having an isotropic surfactant phase, the compositions containing (a) cationic surfactant that includes a quaternary ammonium compound and/or an amidoamine, (b) cleansing surfactant and (c) water, the cleansing surfactant containing 85 to 100% by weight of a combination of betaine surfactant and taurate surfactant in particular ratios; also disclosed are methods of thickening such compositions by the addition of electrolyte.

## Background
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
The present application is a U.S. National Phase Application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2018/072600, filed on Aug. 22, 2018, which claims priority to European Patent Application No. 17187893.7, filed on Aug. 25, 2017, the contents of which are incorporated herein in their entireties.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The subject invention relates to personal cleansing compositions, in particular, to water-based personal cleansing compositions including, for example, body washes, facial washes, and shampoos.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The selection, amount and relative amount of cleansing surfactant contributes to the microstructure of a personal cleansing composition. In turn, microstructure can impact rheological properties such as composition viscosity and viscosity building characteristics, and may also contribute to composition stability.
A sufficient level of cleansing surfactant is ordinarily needed for surfactant molecules to be able to assemble into micelles, and for the micelles to aggregate to build structure. Commercially available water-based cleansing compositions frequently contain upwards of 12 weight percent of cleansing surfactant. The major cleansing surfactant component of such compositions is commonly an alkyl and/or alkyl ether sulfate surfactant, with lauryl and laureth sulfates, surfactants known to afford good detergency, being among the sulfate surfactants commonly employed. Sulfate surfactants belong to a class of materials known as anionic surfactants. The sulfate surfactants are frequently used together with an amphoteric co-surfactant, with betaine surfactants such as cocamidopropyl betaine and cocamido betaine being among the amphoteric surfactants commonly employed. Betaine surfactants help to boast lather and are generally milder than sulfate surfactants, albeit without the detergent power of the sulfate surfactants. Advantageously, personal cleansing compositions based on sulfate surfactant can normally be thickened by the addition of simple salts.
Despite the widespread use of sulfate surfactants in personal cleansing compositions, there is considerable interest in milder alternatives, including compositions in which the anionic surfactant is or includes a taurate surfactant.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,569,825 discloses aqueous cleansing compositions which include (a) a short-chain anionic surfactant chosen from C6-C9 alkyl ether sulphates, C8-C11 acyl lactylates, C6-C9 acyl methyl taurates, C6-C9 acyl isothionates, C6-C11 fatty acid soaps, C6-C9 alkyl sulfates, C6-C11 acyl sarcosinates, C6-C9 alkyl sulphosuccinates, C6-C9 alkyl ether sulphosuccinates, or mixtures thereof; (b) a long chain anionic surfactant chosen from C13-C18 alkyl ether sulphates, C13-C18 acyl lactylates, C13-C16 acyl methyl taurates, C13-C15 acyl isothionates, C13-C16 alkyl sulfates, C13-C16 acyl sarcosinates, C13-C16 alkyl sulphosuccinates, C13-C16 alkyl ether sulphosuccinates, or mixtures thereof; (c) optionally, a medium chain anionic surfactant chosen from C10-C12 alkyl ether sulphates, C12 acyl lactylates, C10-C12 acyl methyl taurates, C10-C912 acyl isothionates, C10-C12 alkyl sulfates, C12 acyl sarcosinates, C10-C12 alkyl sulphosuccinates, C10-C12 alkyl ether sulphosuccinates, or mixtures thereof, and (d) water; wherein (i) at least one of the surfactants (a) and (b) is selected from the group consisting of the acyl lactylates, the acyl sarcossinates, or the short-chain anioinic surfactant (a) is a C9 to C11 fatty acid soap; (ii) if surfactant (c) is present, then the surfactants (a), (b) and (c) are present in an amount such that the weight ratio of (c): [(a)+(b)] is less than 1:1. Among the examples and comparative examples therein disclosed are: Comparative Example F, said to contain 10% cocoether sulphate (3EO)+5% cocoamidobetaine; Comparative Example G said to contain 10% C8 taurate+5% cocoamidobetaine; and Example 3, said to contain 7% coco ether sulphate (3EO)+3% C8 Taurate+5% cocoamido betaine. In commenting on foam and Zion test data for these compositions, Zion test data therein said to be an indication of composition mildness, the patent reports that the addition of the C8 taurate in the blend of Example 3 boosted lather without adversely affecting mildness. Comparative Example F, Comparative Example G and Example 3 were reported to have foam volumes of 79 ml, 44 ml and 145 ml, respectively.
CN 104997661 discloses what are therein said to be mild, silicone-free shampoos having ingredients that include acrylates/steareth-20 methacrylate copolymer, cocamidopropyl betaine, polyquaternium-10, disodium lauroamphoacetate, methyl cocoyl taurate, behenyl trimethyl ammonium chloride, stearyl amidopropyl dimethylamine, glycol distearate, quaternium-27, and cationic conditioning agents, in amounts as therein more particularly described, including compositions having the following ingredient contents: acrylates/steareth-20 methacrylate copolymer 1 ̃6 percent, cocamidopropyl betaine 20 ̃40 percent, polyquaternium-10 0.25 ̃1.25 percent, disodium lauroamphoacetate 2.5 ̃15 percent, methyl cocoyl taurate 1.0 ̃5 percent, behenyl trimethyl ammonium chloride 0.5 ̃3 percent, stearyl amidopropyl dimethyl amine 0.5 ̃3 percent, glycol distearate 1 ̃3 percent, quaternium-27 0.5 ̃3 percent, and cationic conditioning agents 1 ̃4 percent. The composition is said to be free from sulfate surfactants.
WO 99/32079 discloses shampoo compositions that include a silicone microemulsion, at least one surfactant which is a cationic derivative of guar gum, and a deposition polymer. At page 9, line 28 to page 10, line 4, the patent publication states: “exceptional optical clarity and stability, across a wide range of temperatures, can be achieved with the following combination of cleansing surfactants in the stated amounts: from 4 to 8% by weight of the total shampoo composition of acyl methyl taurate and/or acylated collagen polypeptide; and up to 8% by weight of the total shampoo composition of cocamidopropyl betaine.”
US 2014/086864 discloses shampoo compositions comprising a taurine derivative surfactant, an amphoteric surfactant which is an alkylamide betaine, a cationic conditioning polymer, a quaternary ammonium group-containing betaine surfactant, and a quaternary ammonium group-containing silylated urethane polymer. With respect to use on dyed hair, the compositions are therein said to be excellent in fading-inhibiting effect and what is said to be in “in use feeling”. The Examples include compositions that, in addition to other ingredients, contain coconut oil fatty acid methyltaurine and coconut oil fatty acid amide propyl betaine in a combined amount of from 6 to 24 mass %.
JP 2001-220325 A2 discloses hair shampoo compositions having a combination of acyl taurate and betaine surfactants. The compositions further include an alkylbis(dihydroxypropyl)amine represented by the formula: R7N (CH2CH(OH)CH2OH)2, where R7 is an alkyl or alkenyl group having 8 to 22 carbons.
Achieving an acceptable composition viscosity is an important factor in providing a mild personal cleansing composition that can be applied in a controlled manner and readily spread in use. Composition viscosity, together with attributes such as foamability can also impact consumer perception of such products. When sulfate surfactants are eliminated or the level thereof significantly reduced, developing a microstructure that results in desirable rheological properties can be challenging, particularly in the case of mild compositions with low cleansing surfactant contents; additionally, building the viscosity of such compositions by the addition of a simple salt can be problematic. Reducing or eliminating sulfate surfactants can also be problematic in regard to formulating mild cleansing compositions that are stable at acidic pHs.
One approach to the issue of thickening systems that are free or essentially free of sulfate surfactants has been to use sulfate-free surfactants together with polymeric thickeners. Polymeric thickeners can have a gelation effect that transforms a product with what is ordinarily Newtonian rheology under conditions of low shear, such as is experienced, for example, during dosing, application and spreading in-use, to a non-Newtonian rheology. In addition to being detectable by a consumer as an undesirable departure from product norms, the use of such thickeners can further limit the ability to subsequently adjust composition viscosity through the use of simple salts.
Employing relatively high levels of non-sulfate surfactant may also assist in building the viscosity of systems that are free or essentially free of sulfate surfactants. The levels of non-sulfate surfactant needed may, however, be higher than conventional norms, and may also result in non-isotropic surfactant systems having relatively non-labile liquid crystalline structures or domains. In contrast to isotropic surfactant systems, the relatively labile microstructure of which tends to promote foaming efficiency, liquid crystalline microstructures tend to “trap” surfactant and impair foamability. Additionally, liquid crystalline structures or domains may impede light transmission and may impart a turbid or cloudy appearance to a composition, which may be problematic where translucency is desired.
One aspect of this invention is to provide mild personal cleansing compositions having desirable rheological properties, including compositions with relatively low surfactant contents. Another aspect of this invention is to provide mild personal cleansing compositions having an isotropic surfactant phase, including compositions that are stable at acidic pHs. Yet another aspect of this invention is to provide mild personal cleansing compositions, including low surfactant content compositions free or essentially free of sulfate surfactants, the viscosity of which compositions may be increased through the addition of electrolytes such as simple salts. Yet another aspect of this invention is to provide mild personal cleansing compositions having a translucent or transparent appearance.
One or more aspects of this invention may be achieved by the compositions and methods hereinafter described.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Pursuant to the subject invention it was found that inclusion of a cationic surfactant in a personal cleansing composition that contains a combination of taurate surfactant, preferably acyl taurate surfactant, and betaine surfactant can further the development and/or strength of the surfactant phase, even at a relatively low cleansing surfactant concentration, and may allow for the further thickening of the compositions by the addition of an electrolyte such as a simple salt.
In one embodiment there is provided a personal cleansing composition comprising:

    
    
        a) a cationic surfactant comprising a quaternary ammonium compound and/or an amidoamine,
        b) from 5 to 15% weight of cleansing surfactant and
        c) water,

wherein the cleansing surfactant contains from 85 to 100% by weight, based on the total weight of the cleansing surfactant, of a combination of betaine surfactant and taurate surfactant and wherein:

        when the composition contains 5 to 6 weight percent of cleansing surfactant, the weight ratio of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant is from 55:45 to 45:55; when composition contains from greater than 6 weight percent to up to 10 weight percent of cleansing surfactant, the weight ratio of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant is from 80:20: to 40:60; and
        when the composition contains greater than 10 weight percent of cleansing surfactant, the weight ratio of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant is from 80:20: to 20:80.
    
    


Preferably the composition has an isotropic surfactant phase.
According to another embodiment of this invention there is provided a method of adjusting the viscosity of a composition, the method comprising the steps of

    
    
        I) providing a personal cleansing composition comprising:
        
            a) a cationic surfactant comprising a quaternary ammonium compound and/or an amidoamine,
            b) from 5 to 15% by weight of cleansing surfactant and
            c) water,
        
        
        wherein the cleansing surfactant contains from 85 to 100% by weight of a combination of betaine surfactant and taurate surfactant and wherein:
        
            when the composition contains 5 to 6 weight percent of cleansing surfactant, the weight ratio of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant is from 55:45 to 45:55;
            when composition contains from greater than 6 weight percent to up to 10 weight percent of cleansing surfactant, the weight ratio of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant is from 80:20: to 40:60; and
            when the composition contains greater than 10 weight percent of cleansing surfactant, the weight ratio of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant is from 80:20: to 20:80; and.
        
        
        II) adding electrolyte to the composition,
        wherein the addition of electrolyte increases the viscosity of the composition.
    
    





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the shift in crossover frequency under dynamic oscillation that occurs with the addition of stearamidopropyl dimethylamine to a composition having a combined content of taurate surfactant and betaine surfactant of 8.25 wt. % and a weight ratio of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant of 50:50.
FIGS. 2 to 7 are ternary plots of relaxation times (Tr) for compositions containing a taurate surfactant, a betaine surfactant, and various levels of stearamidopropyl dimethylamine; the plots were derived from dynamic oscillatory measurements made under conditions as hereinafter described using a TA ARES-G2 rheometer configured as described below.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Unless indicated otherwise, as used herein, “%” means weight %, alternatively referred to as % by weight. All references to the amount by weight of a component of the instant composition are, unless indicated otherwise, based on the total weight of the composition. Unless indicated otherwise, all ratios are by weight. Unless indicated to the contrary, reference to the amount of a composition component is to the amount of component as active.
All numerical ranges employed in this description ought to be understood as modified by the word “about”. Numerical ranges are understood to encompass the ranges expressly disclosed, as well as ranges subsumed by same. Where the system or method of the subject invention is described as “including” or “comprising” specific components and/or features, narrower embodiments that “consist essentially of” or “consist of” the recited components and/or features are also contemplated.
Cationic Surfactant
Included among the cationic surfactants suitable for use herein are quaternary ammonium compounds of the formula:

N+R1R2R3R4X−  (I)

wherein R1, R2, R3 and R4 are independently, hydrogen, benzyl or C1 to C30 alkyl, and wherein one, two or three of R1, R2, R3 and R4 are independently C6 to C30 alkyl (“long chain alkyl”) and the remaining R1, R2, R3 and R4 group or groups are hydrogen, benzyl or C1 to C4 alkyl (“lower alkyl), and X is a solubilizing anion. Among the suitable solubilizing anions are halides. In one embodiment, one or two of R1, R2, R3 and R4 are long chain alkyl and the other R1, R2, R3 and R4 groups are hydrogen, benzyl or lower alkyl. Formula I compounds wherein one of R1, R2, R3 and R4 are long chain alkyl and the other R1, R2, R3 and R4 groups are hydrogen, benzyl or lower alkyl are herein referred to as monoalkyl quats; formula I compounds wherein two of R1, R2, R3 and R4 are long chain alkyl and the other R1, R2, R3 and R4 groups are hydrogen, benzyl or lower alkyl are herein referred to as dialkyl quats; and formula I compounds wherein three of R1, R2, R3 and R4 are long chain alkyl and the other R1, R2, R3 and R4 group is hydrogen, benzyl or lower alkyl are herein referred to as trialkyl quats. In one embodiment, the long chain alkyl groups of the Formula I quaternary ammonium compounds are independently C6 to C24 alkyl groups. In another embodiment, the long chain alkyl groups of the Formula I quaternary ammonium compounds are independently C8 to C22 alkyl groups.

The long chain alkyl groups of the formula (I) quaternary ammonium compounds may be saturated or unsaturated; the long chain alkyl groups may include an ester, ether or amido inter-chain linkage. In one embodiment the cationic surfactant is an amidoquat of the formula:

CH3(CH2)rC(O)NH(CH2)tN+R13R14R15X1−  (IA)

where r is 5 to 24, t is 2 or 3, and R13, R14, and R15 are independently lower alkyl, preferably methyl and X1 is a solubilizing anion, preferably halide. In one embodiment, r is 5 to 22.

Examples of suitable quaternary ammonium compounds are cetyltrimethylammonium chloride, behenyltrimethylammonium chloride, tetramethylammonium chloride, tetraethylammonium chloride, octyltrimethylammonium chloride, dodecyltrimethylammonium, decyldimethylbenzylammonium chloride, stearyldimethylbenzylammonium chloride, didodecyldimethylammonium chloride, dioctadecyldimethylammonium chloride, tallowtrimethylammonium chloride, di(hydrogenated tallow) dimethyl ammonium chloride, cocotrimethylammonium chloride, and palmitoamidopropyltrimonium chloride. One particularly useful quaternary ammonium compound is behenyltrimethylammonium chloride, yet another particularly useful quaternary ammonium compound is palmitoamidopropyltrimonium chloride.
Another class of cationic surfactants suitable for use herein are amidoamines. Among the suitable amidoamines are the condensation products of fatty acids and polyfunctional amines, for example, amidoamines represented by the formula:

R5R6N—(CH2)x—NHC(O)R7  (II)

where R5 and R6 are independently methyl or ethyl, x is 2 or 3, and R7 is C6 to C30 alkyl. In one embodiment, R7 is C6 to C24 alkyl. R7 may be saturated or unsaturated. In one embodiment, R5 and R6 are methyl and x is 3. Examples of such amidoamines are stearamidopropyldimethylamine, stearamidoethyldiethylamine, stearamidopropyldiethylamine, palmitoamidopropyldimethylamine, palmitamidopropyldiethylamine, palmitoamidoethyldimethylamine, behenamidopropyldimethylamine, behenamidoethyldimethylamine, and arachiamidopropyldimethylamine. One particularly useful amidoamine is stearamidopropyldimethylamine.

Without wishing to be bound to theory it is believed that, in the presence of a protonating agent such as, for example, an organic or mineral acid, the amidoamine may form what is in effect a non-permanent quaternary ammonium or pseudo-quaternary ammonium cationic surfactant. Examples of acids suitable for use as protonating agents include, for example, hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, malic acid and citric acid. Reference to the amidoamine encompasses the surfactant in protonated or non-protonated form.
In one embodiment, the cationic surfactant includes a mixture of formula II amidoamine and formula I quaternary ammonium compound. In one embodiment, the cationic surfactant includes a mixture of Formula I (A) amidoquat and formula amidoamine. In one embodiment, the cationic surfactant comprises a monalkyl quat, a dialkyl quat and/or an amidoamine.
In one embodiment, the personal cleansing composition of the subject invention contains a total amount of up to 2 wt. % of cationic surfactant, based on the total weight of the composition. In another embodiment, the composition contains up to 1.5 wt. % of cationic surfactant, based on the total weight of the composition. In yet another embodiment, the personal cleansing composition contains from 0.05 to 1 wt. % of cationic surfactant, based on the total weight of the composition. In yet another embodiment the personal cleansing composition contains from 0.1 to 0.5 wt % of cationic surfactant, based on the total weight of the composition. In yet another embodiment, the personal cleansing composition contains from 0.1 to 0.3 wt. % of cationic surfactant, based on the total weight of the composition.
Cleansing Surfactant
As used herein the term “cleansing surfactant” refers to anionic and amphoteric/zwitterionic surfactants; cationic surfactant and non-ionic surfactant are not considered to be part of the cleansing surfactant. The cleansing surfactant of the instant invention includes both taurate surfactant and betaine surfactant. In one embodiment, cleansing surfactant is present in an amount of from 5 to 15 wt. %, based on the total weight of the personal cleansing composition. In another embodiment, cleansing surfactant is present in an amount of from 6 to 12 wt. %, based on the total weight of the personal cleansing composition. In yet another embodiment, cleansing surfactant is present in an amount of from 6 to 10 wt. %, based on the total weight of the personal cleansing composition. In yet another embodiment, cleansing surfactant is present in an amount of from 8 to 10 wt. %, based on the total weight of the personal cleansing composition.
Taurate Surfactant
Included among the taurate surfactants employed herein are acylamides of taurine or N-methyltaurine, and salts thereof, for example, acyl taurates represented by the general formula:

R8C(O)N(R9)(CH2)ySO3M  (IIIa),

and preferably by the general formula

R8C(O)N(R9)CH2CH2SO3M  (IIIb),

where R3 is C6 to C30, more particularly C6 to C24 alkyl, y is 2 or 3, R9 is hydrogen or methyl, and M is a solubilizing cation such as, for example, hydrogen, ammonium, alkali metal cation, a lower, i.e., C to C4, alkanolammonium cation, or a basic amino acid cation. In one embodiment, R8 is C8 to C18 alkyl. In one embodiment at least half of the R3 groups are C8-C18 alkyl. In another embodiment at least half of the R8 groups are C10 to C14 alkyl. R8 may be saturated or unsaturated. In one embodiment R9 is methyl.

Suitable acyl taurates according to formula IIIa include, for example, taurates commonly known as sodium methyl lauroyl taurate, potassium methyl lauroyl taurate, sodium methyl myristoyl taurate, potassium methyl myristoyl taurate, ammonium methyl myristoyl taurate, sodium methyl cocoyl taurate, potassium methyl cocoyl taurate, ammonium methyl cocoyl taurate, sodium methyl oleoyl taurate, potassium methyl oleoyl taurate, ammonium methyl oleoyl taurate, sodium lauroyl taurate, potassium lauroyl taurate, ammonium myristoyl taurante, sodium cocoyl taurate, potassium oleoyl taurate, and the like. In one embodiment, a salt of the coconut fatty acid amide of N-methyltaurine is of particular interest.
Betaine Surfactant
Among the suitable betaines for use herein are betaines represented by the general formula:

R10[C(O)NH—(CH2)y]z—N+(R11)(R12)CH2CO2−  (IV)

where R10 is C6 to C30, more particularly C6 to C24 alkyl, z is 0 or 1, R11 and R12 are independently alkyl, hydroxyalkyl or carboxyalkyl of 1 to 3 carbon atoms, and y is 2 or 3; and salts thereof. In one embodiment, at half of the groups R10 are C8 to C18 alkyl. In another embodiment, at least half of the groups R10 are C 10 to C14 alkyl. R10 may be saturated or unsaturated. In one embodiment, R10 is derived from coconut oil or palm kernel oil. In one embodiment R11 and R12 are methyl.

The formula (IV) betaines include the simple betaines:

R10—N+(R11)(R12)CH2CO2−  (IVa)

where R10, R11, and R12 are as described above, and the amidobetaines:

R10C(O)NH—(CH2)y—N+(R11)(R12)CH2CO3−  (IVb)

where R10, R11, R12, and y are as described above.

In one embodiment the betaine surfactant is an amidobetaine, preferably cocamidopropylbetaine.

While the inclusion of cleansing surfactant in addition to the taurate surfactant and betaine surfactants is contemplated, such additional cleansing surfactant, when present, is a minor component of the total cleansing surfactant. In one embodiment the cleansing surfactant contains from 85 to 100% by weight, based on the total weight of the personal cleansing composition, of a combination of betaine surfactant and taurate surfactant. In another embodiment the cleansing surfactant contains from 90 to 100% by weight, based on the total weight of the personal cleansing composition, of a combination of betaine surfactant and taurate surfactant. In another embodiment the cleansing surfactant contains from 95 to 100% by weight, based on the total weight of the personal cleansing composition, of a combination of betaine surfactant and taurate surfactant. In yet another embodiment the cleansing surfactant contains from 99 to 100% by weight, based on the total weight of the personal cleansing composition, of a combination of betaine surfactant and taurate surfactant.
In one embodiment the personal cleansing composition is free or essentially free of sulfate surfactant. “Essentially free of sulfate surfactant” means that the amount of sulfate surfactant, if present, does not exceed 0.5% by weight of the composition. In one embodiment the composition is free or essentially free of additional anionic surfactant. “Essentially free of additional anionic surfactant” means that the amount of anionic surfactant in addition to the taurate surfactant does not exceed 0.5% by weight of the composition.
In one embodiment, when the personal cleansing composition contains 5 to 6 weight percent or less of cleansing surfactant, the weight ratio of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant is from 55:45 to 45:55, preferably from 50:50 to 45:55. In one embodiment, when the composition contains from greater than 6 weight percent to up to 10 weight percent of cleansing surfactant, the weight ratio of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant is from 80:20 to 40:60, preferably from 75:25 to 50:50. In one embodiment, when the composition contains from greater than 10 weight percent to up to 15 weight percent of cleansing surfactant, the weight ratio of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant is from 80:20: to 20:80, preferably from 75:25 to 25:75.
Water
Water is also included in the personal cleansing compositions of the present invention. Water is generally present in a total amount of from 70 to 95%. by weight. In one embodiment, water is present in a total amount of from 75 to 95% by weight. In another embodiment, water is present in a total amount of from 85 to 93% by weight. In yet another embodiment, water is present in a total amount of from 85 to 90% by weight.
Electrolyte
The personal cleansing compositions of the invention may further comprise electrolyte. The addition of electrolyte may assist in adjusting composition viscosity. Electrolytes are materials that dissolve in water and ionize. The term excludes materials such as cleansing surfactant and cationic surfactant, as well as other materials that aggregate in solution. Among the electrolytes suitable for use herein are simple salts of organic or inorganic acids. Chlorides, nitrates, sulfates, and carboxylates are among the suitable salts. Examples of suitable electrolytes are sodium chloride, ammonium chloride, magnesium chloride, sodium sulfate and sodium citrate. Typically, the electrolytes are relatively small molecules that frequently have nominal molecular weights of less than 600 g/mol.
When present, the total amount of electrolyte is preferably less than 5 wt. %, more preferably less than 4 wt. % based on the total weight of the personal cleansing composition. In one embodiment electrolyte is present in an amount of from 0.05 to 3 wt. %, based on the total weight of the personal cleansing composition. In another embodiment, electrolyte is present in an amount of from 0.1 to 2 wt. %, based on the total weight of the personal cleansing composition. In yet another embodiment, electrolyte is present in an amount of from 0.1 to 1.5 wt. % Instill another embodiment, electrolyte is present in an amount of from 0.1 to 1 wt. %, based on the total weight of the personal cleansing composition.
While the addition of electrolyte may assist in building composition viscosity, at too high a level, it may detract from the translucency of the composition. Where translucency is or transparency is desired, the amount of cleansing surfactant and relative amount of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant should be selected such that little or no added electrolyte is needed to build viscosity, while at the same time keeping the amount of cleansing surfactant at a level where such surfactant does not undesirably impact transmission of light through the composition. In this regard, a total cleansing surfactant content of from 6 to 10 weight may be of particular interest.
Excluding products in pre-diluted form or products formulated as relatively non-viscous or “water thin” products for applicators such as, for example, pump foamers, the personal cleansing compositions of the subject invention have or are adjusted to viscosities in the range of from 2500 cP to 10000 cP, depending upon the particular product form of the composition, and the desired thickness thereof. In one embodiment viscosities in a range of from 3000 to 9000 cP are of interest. In yet another embodiment viscosities in a range of from 3500-8000 cP are of interest. In yet another embodiment viscosities in a range of from 4000-6000 cP are of interest. Unless otherwise indicated, viscosity references are given with respect to measurements obtained using an AR2000EX rheometer from TA Instruments (30° C., 1 mm gap, 90 sec equilibrium time, 30 sec measurement, at 4 reciprocal seconds, 40 mm steel plate spindle).
The personal cleansing compositions of the subject invention are commonly formulated to a pH of from 3.5 to 7. In one embodiment, compositions formulated to pH of from 4 to 6 are of interest. In another embodiment, compositions formulated to a pH of from 4 to 5 are of interest. In one embodiment, when the cationic surfactant comprises an amidoamine, the composition has a pH of from 4 to 5.5.
Additional Optional Ingredients
The personal cleansing compositions of the invention may contain one or more additional ingredients for enhancing performance and/or consumer appeal. Such ingredients include, for example, fragrance, fragrance encapsulates, botanical extracts, fruit extracts, and other emotives, dyes, pigments, pH adjusting agents, buffers, pearlescers, opacifiers, preservatives, humectants, suspending agents, skin and/or hair conditioners, skin and/or hair nutrients, vitamins, amino acids, preservatives, and bactericides, to name a few. In one embodiment, the total amount of such additional optional ingredients is less than 15 wt % of the personal cleansing composition. In another embodiment, the total amount of such additional optional ingredients is less than 10 wt % of the personal cleansing composition. In yet another embodiment, the total amount of such additional optional ingredients is from 0.01 to 5 wt % of the personal cleansing composition. The amount of additional optional ingredients will depend, in part, upon the particular ingredient, the use for which it is employed, and the properties desired from its use.
In one embodiment the personal cleansing composition is free or essentially free of (meth)acrylate polymers and copolymers. “Essentially free of (meth)acrylate polymers or copolymers” means that the total amount of such polymers and copolymers, if present, does not exceed 0.0.01 wt. % of the personal cleansing composition. In one embodiment, the personal cleansing composition is free or essentially free of quaternary ammonium group-containing silylated urethane polymer. “Essentially free of quaternary ammonium group-containing silylated urethane polymer” means that the total amount of such polymer, if present, is less than 0.01 wt. % of the personal cleansing composition. In one embodiment the personal cleansing composition is free or essentially free of a cationic derivative of guar gum. “Essentially free of a cationic derivative of guar gum” means that, if present, the total amount thereof is less than 0.01 wt. % of the composition.
The personal cleansing compositions may be prepared by conventional techniques wherein the cationic surfactant and cleansing surfactant are solubilized in water, typically with heating and stirring, and cooled, as needed, to a temperature that allows for subsequent addition of composition ingredients. Cooling and subsequent ingredient addition may be staged, based on the properties of the ingredients subsequently added. For example fragrance and other volatile components are typically added when the composition is below a temperature at which they volatize. Heated surfactant solutions in which the cation surfactant is solubilized should not be cooled so rapidly as to precipitate the cationic surfactant.
The personal cleansing compositions of this invention may be provided in a variety of product forms including, for example, body washes, facial washes and shampoos. In one embodiment, compositions in the form of shampoos are of particular interest. The personal cleansing composition is typically diluted with water and worked into a lather. Unless expressly indicated otherwise, the percentages of composition ingredients recited herein are with reference to the composition prior to dilution in use, that is, in the composition as packaged. The personal cleansing compositions may be provided in packaging that includes directions that convey that the composition is to be applied, lathered and rinsed-off.
EXAMPLES
In the Examples that follow, stearamidopropyl dimethyl amine is alternatively referred to as “TAS”, cocamidopropyl betaine is alternatively referred to as “CAPB” or “Betaine”, and sodium cocoyl taurate is alternatively referred to as “Taurate”. In the tables that follow the reported wt. % of listed ingredients is given in reference to such ingredients as separately added components. For example, the reported wt. % of disodium EDTA, sodium chloride and sodium benzoate does not take into account such materials, if any, included as part of any ingredients identified in the Tables by brand name. Compositions as described in Tables 1, 2A and 3 below were prepared by means of the following general procedure:

    
    
        Heat an initial aliquot of water (deionized) to a target temperature of 63° C. to 65° C.; if used, add cationic surfactant surfactant (stearamidopropyl dimethylamine and/or behenyltrimethylammonium chloride, the behenyltrimethylammonium chloride (BTAC) being provided as a mixture with dipropylene glycol) and mix until dissolved. Discontinue heating, add the sodium cocoyl taurate (Pureact WS Conc) and mix until dissolved; add the cocamidopropyl betaine (Tego® Betain CK KB5) and mix for approximately 5 minutes. When the mixture has cooled to 40° C. to 43° C., add the additional water (deionized), into which is mixed the polyquaternium-10. Then add the disodium EDTA, sodium benzoate, fragrance and citric acid and mix for 10 minutes.
    
    


Example 1
The general procedure above was used to prepare a series of samples as described in Table 1 (6 compositions per sample series; TAS present in an amount of 0 (no TAS), 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 or 0.5 wt. %).









TABLE 1









Sample Series













Ingredient wt. %
A
B
C
D
E
F





Initial Aliquot of Water
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100


Additional Water
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0


Polyquaternium-10
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


Tego ® Betain CK KB5*
3.33
6.66
10.00
6.87
13.75
20.63


Pureact WS Conc.**
10.00
6.66
3.33
20.63
13.75
6.87


Stearamidopropyl
0 to 0.5
0 to 0.5
0 to 0.5
0 to 0.5
0 to 0.5
0 to 0.5


dimethyl amine (TAS)


Fragrance
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9


Disodium EDTA
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05


Sodium Benzoate
0.45
0.47
0.45
0.47
0.43
0.40


Citric Acid (50 wt. %
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2


aqueous solution)


Total Cleansing
4
4
4
8.25
8.25
8.25


surfactant (wt. %)


Wt. Ratio
25:75
50:50
75:25
25:75
50:50
75:25


Betaine:Taurate





*Tego ® Betain CK KB5 from Evonik Industries; ≈30% cocamidopropyl betaine


**Pureact WS CONC from Innospec Performance Chemicals; ≈30% sodium methyl cocoyl taurate






Viscoelastic properties of the compositions under harmonic oscillation were obtained employing a TA ARES-G2 rheometer with 50 mm parallel plate geometry (1 mm gap). Measurements were made at 25° C. A frequency range of 0.01 to 100 Hz was applied to the compositions at 1% strain, with the elastic modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G′′) of the composition being measured as a function of frequency. An isotropic surfactant phase is a surfactant phase in which the predominant surfactant microstructures are micelles of aggregated surfactant molecules. Preferably the surfactant phase is an isotropic, rod-like micellar system, that is, a system in which the predominant surfactant microstructure is that of generally rod-like micelles. For an isotropic, rod-like micellar system, the oscillatory response resembles a Maxwell spring and dashpot model where, below the crossover frequency (crossover frequency representing the frequency where G′=G′′), the ratio of the slope of G′ to the slope of G′′ is approximately 2 to 1.
FIG. 1 is a graph comparing the elastic modulus (G′) and elastic loss modulus (G′′) of compositions from the Sample E series (combined content of taurate and betaine of 8.25 wt. %; weight ratio of betaine:taurate of 50:50) at stearamidopropyl dimethylamine levels of 0 or 0.5 wt. %. The graph shows the shift in crossover frequency that occurs by the addition of stearamidopropyl dimethylamine, demonstrating the addition of stearamidopropyl dimethylamine to be effective in building micellar structure of the composition. The ratio of the slope of G′ to the slope of G′′ below the crossover of G′ and G′′ is approximately 2 to 1, indicative of the composition having an isotropic, rod-like micellar system.
The reciprocal of the frequency at the crossover of G′ and G′′, where G′=G′′, is the characteristic relaxation time, alternatively referred to as “relaxation time” or Tr. Relaxation times of the Series A to F compositions are shown in the ternary plots of FIGS. 2 to 7; relaxation times are reported in units of milliseconds (ms).
FIG. 2 is a plot of relaxation times of the Sample A series of compositions. The plotted relaxation times were very short and ranged from 21.1 ms to 54.2 ms; no crossover frequency was observed for the compositions containing 0.1 to 0.3 wt. % stearamidopropyl dimethylamine, an indication that these compositions did not build sufficient micellar structure to provide a measurable relaxation time.
FIG. 3 is a plot of relaxation times of the Sample B series of compositions. The plotted relaxation times ranged from 31.4 ms to 267.8 ms. Relaxation times were shown to increase from 31.4 ms for the composition with no stearamidopropyl dimethylamine to 267.8 ms for the composition containing 0.2 wt. % stearamidopropyl dimethyl amine. Between 0.3 and 0.5 wt % stearamidopropyl dimethylamine relaxation times decreased from 185.0 ms to 84.9 ms, but were still significantly higher than the relaxation time for composition with no stearamidopropyl dimethylamine.
FIG. 4 is a plot of relaxation times of the Sample C series of compositions. Relaxation times were shown to increase from 67.6 ms for the composition with no stearamidopropyl dimethylamine to 83.6 ms for the composition containing 0.1 wt. % stearamidopropyl dimethylamine. Between 0.2 to 0.5 wt. % stearamidopropyl amine, the relaxation times decreased from 48.2 ms to 14.0 ms. The reported relaxation times are generally consistent with compositions that have a relatively weak micellar structure.
FIG. 5 is a plot of relaxation times of the Sample D series of compositions. The plotted relaxation times were relatively short and ranged from 33.1 ms to 41.2 ms. The reported relaxation times are generally consistent with compositions that have a relatively weak micellar structure.
FIG. 6 is a plot of relaxation times of the Sample E series of compositions. The plotted relaxation times ranged from 101.0 ms to 666.7 ms. Relaxation times were shown to increase as the level of stearamidopropyl dimethylamine increased.
FIG. 7 is a plot of relaxation times of the Sample F series of compositions. The plotted relaxation times ranged from 303.0 ms to 454.5 ms, with relaxation times increasing as the level of stearamidopropyl dimethylamine increased to 0.4 wt. % of the composition. The relaxation time of the compositions containing 0.4 wt. % stearamidopropyl dimethylamine and the composition containing 0.5 wt. % stearamidopropyl dimethyl amine was essentially the same.
The plots of FIGS. 2 to 7 show that both the cleansing surfactant content and the amount of betaine surfactant relative to taurate surfactant to betaine surfactant can significantly impact the ability of stearamidopropyl dimethylamine to assist in building micellar structure.
Example 2
Compositions as described in Table 2A were prepared following the general procedure prepared above. The pH of the compositions ranged from 4.0 to 4.7. The initial viscosity of each of the resulting compositions was measured. Viscosity adjusting agent was post-added to the initially formed TAS-containing compositions, as indicated; sodium chloride to adjust the viscosity upward, or PPG-9 to adjust the viscosity downward. Viscosity adjusting agent was post-added until an adjusted viscosity within a target viscosity of 4000 to 8000 cP was obtained or the added amount of viscosity adjusting agent reached the maximum total amount. Viscosity adjusting agent was posted added in increments of 0.05 wt. % up to a total amount of 0.2 wt. %, and thereafter as increments of 0.1 wt. %, up to the maximum total amount of 2.0 wt. %, based on the total weight of the initially formed composition. Sodium chloride was post-added to the TAS-free C1 and C2 compositions in increments of 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 wt. %, up to a total amount of 1.0 wt %, based on the total weight of the initially formed composition. At total post added salt levels of 0.2 wt %, 0.5. wt. % and 1.0 wt. %, the adjusted viscosity of the C1 composition was 2656 cP, 2508 cP, and 2706 cP, respectively. At total post-added salt levels of 0.2 wt %, 0.5. wt,% and 1.0 wt. %, the adjusted viscosities of the C2 composition were 6197 cP, 6443 cPs, and 7093 cP, respectively. Viscosity measurements were obtained using an AR2000EX rheometer from TA Instruments (30° C., 1 mm gap, 90 sec equilibrium time, 30 sec measurement, A-4 1/s, 40 mm steel plate spindle).










TABLE 2A









Sample














Ingredient wt. %
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6





Initial Aliquot Water
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100


Additional Water
12
12
12
12
12
12


Polyquaternium- 10
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


Tego ® Betain CK KB5*
20.63
31.25
3.33
6.66
10.0
6.87


Pureact WS Conc.
6.87
10.41
10.0
6.66
3.333
20.63


Stearamidopropyl
—
—
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10


dimethyl amine (TAS)


Fragrance
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9


Disodium EDTA
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05


Sodium Benzoate
0.41
0.34
0.45
0.47
0.45
0.47


Citric Acid (50 wt %
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2


Aqueous Solution)


Total Cleansing
8.25
12.5
4
4
4
8.25


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
75:25
75:25
25:75
50:50
75:25
25:75


Betaine:Taurate


Initial Viscosity (cP)
3240
6128
3
339
691
59


Hazy (Yes/No)
No
Yes
No
No
No
No


Viscosity adjusting
NaCl
NaCl
NaCl
NaCl
NaCl
NaCl


agent (wt. %)
(1.0)
(1.0)
(2.0)
(2.0)
(2.0)
(2.0)


Adjusted Viscosity (cP)
2706
7093
238
180
176
638


Hazy (Yes/No)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes












Sample













Ingredient wt. %
1
2
3
4
5
6





Initial Aliquot Water
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100


Additional Water
12
12
12
12
12
12


Polyquaternium- 10
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


Tego ® Betain CK KB5*
13.75
13.75
20.63
31.25
20.83
10.41


Pureact WS Conc**.
13.75
13.75
6.87
10.41
20.83
31.25


Stearamidopropyl
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10


dimethyl amine (TAS)


Fragrance
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9


Disodium EDTA
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05


Sodium Benzoate
0.43
0.43
0.40
0.34
0.40
0.45


Citric Acid (50 wt %
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2


aqueous solution)


Total Cleansing
8.25
8.25
8.25
12.5
12.5
12.5


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
50:50
50:50
75:25
75:25
50:50
25:75


Betaine:Taurate


Initial Viscosity (cP)
2327
2580
4741
10280
13990
259


Hazy (Yes/No)
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes


Viscosity adjusting
NaCl
NaCl
—
PPG-9
PPG-9
NaCl


agent (wt. %)
(0.7)
(0.7)

(0.1)
(0.15)
(2.0)


Adjusted Viscosity (cP)
4683
4876
—
6210
6704
4765


Hazy (Yes/No)
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes





*Tego Betain CK KB5 from Evonik Industries; ≈30% cocamidopropyl betaine


**Pureact WS Conc. from Innospec Performance Chemicals; ≈30% sodium methyl cocoyl taurate






Samples 1 to 6 and comparative samples C3 to C6 all contained 0.1 wt. % stearamidopropyl dimethyl amine. The initial viscosities of samples 4 and 5 (cleansing surfactant content of 12.5 wt. %; betaine:taurate weight ratio of 75:25 and 50:50, respectively) were above the targeted range and had to be adjusted downward. The viscosity of sample 6 (cleansing surfactant content of 12.5 wt. %; betaine:taurate weight ratio of 25:75) was brought within the targeted range by the addition of 2.0 wt. % sodium chloride. The C6 sample (cleansing surfactant content of 8.25 wt. %; betaine:taurate weight ratio of 25:75) was not brought with the targeted range by the addition of sodium chloride at the highest level considered (2.0 wt. %). The initial viscosity of sample 3 was within the targeted viscosity range and did not require viscosity adjustment.
The viscosities of comparative samples C3, C4 and C5 (total surfactant content of 4 wt. %; betaine:taurate ratios of 25:75, 50:50 and 75:25, respectively) was not brought within the targeted range by the addition of sodium chloride at highest level considered (2.0 wt. %). The viscosities of samples 1 and 2 (cleansing surfactant content of 8.25 wt. % betaine:taurate sodium ratio of 50:50) were brought within the targeted range by the addition of 0.7 wt. % sodium chloride. The initial viscosity of sample 3 (cleansing surfactant content of 8.25 wt. %, betaine:taurate ratio of 75:25) was within the targeted range and did not require adjustment.
The C1 sample had a significantly lower initial viscosity (3240 cPs) than sample 3 (initial viscosity 4741 cP), which, pre-salt adjustment, contained a like amount of cleansing surfactant (8.25%) and a like betaine:taurate ratio (75:25); the inclusion of TAS in sample 3 being shown to develop composition viscosity. Salt addition did not bring the adjusted viscosity of the C1 sample within the targeted range; at 1.0 wt. % of added salt, the adjusted viscosity of the C1 composition was less than the initial viscosity. The C2 sample had a significantly lower initial viscosity (6128 cP) than sample 4 (initial viscosity 10280 cP), which contained a like amount of cleansing surfactant and a like betaine:taurate ratio (75:25); the inclusion of TAS in sample 4 being shown to develop composition viscosity.
Foam properties of sample 3 and the viscosity adjusted compositions of samples 1 to 2, 4 to 6 and C3 to C6 are reported in Table 2B. Foam properties were obtained by the following general procedures.
Foam volume measurements were obtained using a Sitafoam R-2000 Foam Tester from SITA Lab Solutions (Sita Foam Software D/DAC; version 1.0.11.549). The water reservoir of the tester was filled with water at a temperature of 40-42° C. Test settings were adjusted to 40 stir cycles, 20 seconds per cycle, at 1000 rpm with 250 ml water. A 1 g sample of the composition to be tested was introduced to the tester, and the foam volume measured under the settings described. The volume of foam generated by the sample is reported in ml.
Foam density and stability were measured by the following procedure:

    
    
        Tare a 100 m graduated cylinder on a balance.
        Into a Braun kitchen blender, measure 200 ml of tap water at 45° C. and add 2 ml of the composition to be tested.
        Using a timer, use the “pulse” switch for 10 s and release the switch without stopping the timer, pausing pulsing for 10 seconds.
        Repeat the 10 second pulse/10 second pause cycles until 70 seconds are elapsed (a total of three and a half cycles).
        Transfer the resulting foam ton the graduated cylinder until the level reaches the 100 ml mark.
        Record the weight of the foam as shown on the balance (density).
        Start the timer for 5 minutes and record the volume of liquid at the bottom of the graduated cylinder (stability)
    
    














TABLE 2B








Foam Vol.
Foam Density
Foam Stability



Sample
(ml)
(g/100 ml)
(ml)





















1
427
8.7
6.5



2
411
8.1
8.0



3
450
15.0
13.0



4
446
8.7
7.5



5
441
9.5
8.0



6
424
10.3
9.0



C3
391
8.08
6.5



C4
399
9.92
7.0



C5
321
11.82
9.0



C6
409
9.97
8.0










On balance, all samples tested had acceptable foam properties, with samples 3 to 5 providing the highest foam volumes.

Salon testing (50 trained panelists) was carried out on the sample 3 composition. In such testing, the sample 3 composition was perceived as having good cleansing properties.

Example 3
Compositions as described in Table 3 were prepared by the general procedure described above and their initial viscosities measured. Viscosity adjusting agent was post-added to the initially formed compositions in the amounts indicated and viscosities of the final compositions measured. The final compositions were stored for 2 months at 45° C., and their viscosities re-measured. Viscosities were measured using the equipment and under the conditions described above.









TABLE 3









Sample














Ingredient wt. %
C7
7
8
9
10
11
12





Initial Aliquot Water
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100


Additional Water
12
12
12
12
12
12
12


Polyquaternium- 10
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


Tego ® Betain CK KB5*
15.83
15.83
15.83
15.83
15.83
15.83
15.83


Pureact WS Conc.**
—
11.33
11.33
11.33
11.33
11.33
11.33


Stearamidopropyl
0.1
—
—
0.10
0.1
0.25
0.5


dimethyl amine


BTAC/Dipropylene
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.10
—
0.25
0.5


Glycol (as a 70/30


mixture by weight)


Fragrance
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6


Disodium EDTA
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05


Sodium Benzoate
0.4208
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42


Citric Acid (50 wt %
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2


Aq. Soln.)


Total Cleansing
4.75
8.15
8.15
8.15
8.15
8.15
8.15


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
—
58:42
58:42
58:42
58:42
58:42
58:42


Betaine:Taurate


Initial Viscosity
Too thin
5016
8038
6736
5773
11100
21800


(cP)
to measure


Viscosity adjusting
NaCl.
NaCl
—
NaCl
NaCl
PPG-9
PPG-9


agent (wt. %)
(1.0)
(0.1)

(0.1)
(0.1)
(0.05)
(0.20)


Viscosity Final
Remained
6175
8038
8023
7259
7918
7990


Composition Fresh
too thin


(cP)
to measure


Viscosity Final
—
6589
9189
7955
7292
7857
7130


Composition After


Storage (cP)





*Tego Betain CK KB5 from Evonik Industries; ≈30% cocamidopropyl betaine


**Pureact WS Conc. from Innospec Performance Chemicals; ≈30% sodium methyl cocoyl taurate






After 2 months at 45° C., the final compositions of Samples 7 to 12 were all within % of their fresh viscosities, with the after storage viscosities of the final compositions of samples 9, 10 and 11 being within 1% of their fresh viscosities.
Example 4
Compositions as described in Tables 4, 5 and 6 below were prepared by means of the following procedure, a variation of the general procedure described above:

    
    
        Reserve approximately 10 to 15% of the initial water. Add polyquaternium-10 to the remainder of the initial water, and begin heating to a target temperature of 60° C. to 65° C. (70° C. if stearamidopropyl dimethylamine is to be added). Once the polyquaternium-10 is fully dissolved, add the sodium cocoyltaurate (Pureact WS Conc.) and mix until dissolved; if used, add stearamidopropyl dimethylamine and mix until dissolved. Begin cooling to 30° C. During the cooling phase, add the cocamidopropyl betaine (Tego® Betain CK KB5) and mix until dissolved. Add the disodium EDTA and sodium benzoate, pre-dispersed in the reserved water (warmed to 40-60° C.). If present in the formulation, add the palmitoamidopropyltrimonium chloride (Varisoft® PATC) and mix until fully dispersed. When the mixture has cooled to below 35° C., add fragrance and adjust to a pH of 4.2-4.8 by the addition of citric acid, then add the sodium chloride as indicated. Viscosities of the resulting compositions were measured using a discovery hybrid rheometer (model DHR-2) from TA Instruments (30° C. at 4 reciprocal seconds, sandblasted plate). Composition viscosities are reported in Tables 4 and 6 below. Samples C8, C9, C10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, C11, 19, C12, 20, and 21 of Table 4 respectively correspond to Samples A(1), B(1), B(2), K(1), K(4), O(1), Q(1), X(1), X(2), X(4), Y(1), Z(1), Y(5), BB(3) and BB(4) of Table 6.
        Light transmission through the compositions was measured using a Formulaction Turbiscan LAB, which uses a Static Multiple Light Scattering method. A ΔT of >−20% (compared against a sample of distilled water) is herein considered to be “transparent”.
    
    











TABLE 4









Sample














Ingredient wt. %
C8
C9
C10
12
13
14
15





Initial Water (deionized)
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100


Polyquaternium- 10
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


Pureact WS Conc.**
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
13.33
13.33


Stearamidopropyl
—
0.3
0.3
—
—
0.15
0.15


dimethyl amine


Tego ® Betain CK KB5*
6.66
6.66
6.66
20
20
13.33
13.33


Disodium EDTA
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05


Sodium Benzoate
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5


Varisoft ® PATC***
—
—
—
1
1
0.5
1


Fragrance
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7


Citric Acid (50 wt. %
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2


aq. solution)


Sodium Chloride
—
—
0.5
—
1.5
—
—


Total Cleansing
4
4
4
8
8
8
8


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
50:50
50:50
50:50
75:25
75:25
50:50
50:50


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
51
676
588
1897
2879
3015
8480


ΔT (%)
−5.34
−2.96
−2.53
−7.72
−86.59
−4.05
−2.67











*
Sample















Ingredient wt. %
16
17
18
C11
19
C12
20
21





Initial Water
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100
To 100


(deionized)


Polyquaternium- 10
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2


Pureact WS Conc.**
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20


Stearamidopropyl
0.15
0.15
0.15
—
0.3
—
0.3
0.3


dimethyl amine


Tego ® Betain CK KB5*
13.33
13.33
13.33
20
20
20
20
20


Disodium EDTA
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05


Sodium Benzoate
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5


Varisoft ® PATC***
0.5
0.5
0.5
—
—
—
1
1


Fragrance
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7


Citric Acid (50 wt. %
1.2.
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2


aq. solution)


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1.5
—
—
2
1
1.5


Total Cleansing
10
10
10
12
12
12
12
12


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
40:60
40:60
40:60
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
2466
5000
9031
11168
17632
23074
27959
26020


ΔT (%)
−4.42
−86.82
−87.00
−86.56
−86.84
−87.03
−86.94
−86.93





*Tego ® Betain CK KB5 from Evonik Industries; ≈30% cocamidopropyl betaine


**Pureact WS Conc. from Innospec Performance Chemicals; ≈30% sodium methyl cocoyl taurate


***Varisoft ® PATC from Evonik Industries; ≈60% palmitoamidopropyltrimonium chloride
















TABLE 5








General Formulation of



Ingredient wt. %
Table 6 Samples









Initial Water (deionized)
To 100



Polyquaternium- 10
0.2



Pureact WS Conc.**
As indicated in Table 6



Stearamidopropyl
As indicated in Table 6



dimethyl amine



Tego ® Betain CK KB5*
As indicated in Table 6



Disodium EDTA
 0.05



Sodium Benzoate
0.5



Varisoft ® PATC***
As indicated in Table 6



Fragrance
0.7



Citric Acid (50 wt. % aq.
1.2



solution)



Sodium Chloride
As indicated in Table 6







*Tego ®Betain CK KB5 from Evonik Industries; ≈30% cocamidopropyl betaine



**Pureact WS Conc. from Innospec Performance Chemicals; ≈30% sodium methyl cocoyl taurate



***Varisoft ® PATC from Evonik Industries; ≈60% palmitoamidopropyltrimonium















TABLE 6







Sample



























A(1)
A(2)
A(3)
A(4)
A(5)
B(1)
B(2)
B(3)
B(4)
B(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66


Stearamidopropyl
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
51
120
310
501
581
676
588
181
136
114


ΔT (%)
−5.34
−2.07
−3.83
−74.46
−82.84
−2.96
−2.53
−85.63
−86.84
−86.76






C(1)
C(2)
C(3)
C(4)
C(5)
D(1)
D(2)
D(3)
D(4)
D(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66


Stearamidopropyl
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
729
189
142
110
94
217
111
95
92
86


ΔT (%)
−5.77
−79.70
−83.07
−87.04
−87.05
−87.07
−87.15
−87.12
−87.11
−87.14






E(1)
E(2)
E(3)
E(4)
E(5)
F(1)
F(2)
F(3)
F(4)
F(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99


Stearamidopropyl
—
—
—
—
—
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99
9.99


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
114
299
651
1129
1802
222
553
1144
1872
2626


ΔT (%)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—






G(1)
G(2)
G(3)
G(4)
G(5)
H(1)
H(2)
H(3)
H(4)
H(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66


Stearamidopropyl
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
33:67
33:67
33:67
33:67
33:67
67:33
67:33
67:33
67:33
67:33


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
93
320
882
1542
1550
3510
3935
3913
3805
3725


ΔT (%)
−2.65
−3.36
−5.92
−83.81
−85.44
−3.42
−8.19
−86.59
−86.64
−86.32






I(1)
I(2)
I(3)
I(4)
I(5)
J(1)
J(2)
J(3)
J(4)
J(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
20
20
20
20
20


Stearamidopropyl
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
20
20
20
20
20
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
75:25
75:25
75:25
75:25
75:25
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
1084
1292
1386
1615
1858
1304
1526
1747
2145
2057


ΔT (%)
−4.60
−85.86
−85.14
−85.96
−86.10
−2.83
−86.61
−86.84
−86.87
−86.90






K(1)
K(2)
K(3)
K(4)
K(5)
L(1)
L(2)
L(3)
L(4)
L(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20


Stearamidopropyl
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
75:25
75:25
75:25
75:25
75:25
75:25
75:25
75:25
75:25
75:25


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
1897
2166
2393
2879
2792
3066
3456
3649
4082
3985


ΔT (%)
−7.72
−85.97
−86.43
−86.59
−86.62
−77.32
−86.76
−86.78
−86.79
−86.85






M(1)
M(2)
M(3)
M(4)
M(5)
N(1)
N(2)
N(3)
N(4)
N(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33


Stearamidopropyl
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
—
—
—
—
—


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
—
—
—
—
—
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
1069
2416
3978
5125
5671
1554
3067
4679
5893
6689


ΔT (%)
−2.56
−15.37
−86.55
−86.87
−86.90
−3.20
−46.47
−86.72
−86.9
−86.92






O(1)
O(2)
O(3)
O(4)
O(5)
P(1)
P(2)
P(3)
P(4)
P(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33


Stearamidopropyl
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
3015
5032
7104
7905
7867
5238
7271
8727
8443
6988


ΔT (%)
−4.05
−78.82
−86.84
−86.84
−86.92
−3.96
−85.41
−86.83
−86.91
−86.79






Q(1)
Q(2)
Q(3)
Q(4)
Q(5)
R(1)
R(2)
R(3)
R(4)
R(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33


Stearamidopropyl
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
1
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
8480
9812
8444
6467
4725
6525
7979
8514
7932
6797


ΔT (%)
−2.67
−86.60
−86.79
−86.82
−86.79
−2.56
−84.57
−86.99
−87.02
−86.97






S(1)
S(2)
S(3)
S(4)
S(5)
T(1)
T(2)
T(3)
T(4)
T(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20


Stearamidopropyl
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3−
0.3


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
12
19
41
79
248
39
94
231
495
1245


ΔT (%)
−3.37
−3.14
−6.19
−81.82
−84.47
−2.56
−3.71
−71.23
−83.69
−85.82






U(1)
U(2)
U(3)
U(4)
U(5)
V(1)
V(2)
V(3)
V(4)
V(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20


Stearamidopropyl
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66
6.66


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75
25:75


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
44
135
424
1013
1945
183
682
1670
2896
3272


ΔT (%)
−3.41
−3.96
−75.06
−84.66
−86.18
−2.92
−4.73
−85.72
−86.67
−86.41






W(1)
W(2)
W(3)
W(4)
W(5)
X(1)
X(2)
X(3)
X(4)
X(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
20
20
20
20
20


Stearamidopropyl
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
20
20
20
20
20
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33
13.33


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
60:40
60:40
60:40
60:40
60:40
40:60
40:60
40:60
40:60
40:60


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
11524
14553
15357
15286
15881
2466
5000
7498
9031
9345


ΔT (%)
−86.61
−86.97
−87.01
−87.04
−87.02
−4.42
−86.82
−86.96
−87.00
−87.04






Y(1)
Y(2)
Y(3)
Y(4)
Y(5)
Z(1)
Z(2)
Z(3)
Z(4)
Z(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20


Stearamidopropyl
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
11168
16161
19251
22904
23074
17632
23055
24150
26050
25917


ΔT (%)
−86.56
−86.68
−86.89
−86.96
−87.03
−86.84
−86.90
−86.96
−86.95
−86.92






AA(1)
AA(2)
AA(3)
AA(4)
AA(5)
BB(1)
BB(2)
BB(3)
BB(4)
BB(5)





Pureact WS Conc. (wt %)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20


Stearamidopropyl
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3−
0.3


dimethyl amine (wt %)


Tego ® Betain CK KB5
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20


(wt %)


Varisoft ® PATC (wt %)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1


Sodium Chloride
—
0.5
1
1.5
2
—
0.5
1
1.5
2


Total Cleansing
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12


Surfactant (wt. %)


Weight Ratio
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50
50:50


Betaine:Taurate


Viscosity (cP)
18529
21713
22528
22867
22833
29363
28650
27959
26020
22803


ΔT (%)
−87.00
−87.07
−87.16
−87.11
−87.13
−86.88
−86.91
−86.94
−86.93
−86.88









The Table 4 and Table 6 data demonstrates the impact of formulation on transparency and viscosity build. Samples C8, C9 and C10 were all transparent compositions, but lacked acceptable viscosities. Samples 12, 14 and 15 (total cleansing surfactant content of from 8 to 10 wt %) were all transparent compositions the viscosities of which ranged from ranged from 1897 cP to 8480 cP. All of the samples with surfactant contents of 12 wt % were hazy rather than transparent.

## Claims

1. A personal cleansing composition comprising:
a) a cationic surfactant comprising an amidoamine
b) 5 to 15 wt. % cleansing surfactant, and
c) water,
wherein:
the cleansing surfactant contains from 85 to 100% by weight of a combination of betaine surfactant and taurate surfactant, wherein the taurate surfactant is an acyl taurate represented by the general formula:


R8C(O)N(R9)(CH2)ySO3M  (IIIa)


where R9 is C6 to C30 alkyl,
y is 2 or 3,
R9 is hydrogen or methyl, and
M is a solubilizing cation, and wherein:
when the composition contains 5 to 6 weight percent of cleansing surfactant, the weight ratio of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant is from 55:45 to 45:55;
when composition contains from greater than 6 weight percent to up to 10 weight percent of cleansing surfactant, the weight ratio of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant is from 80:20: to 40:60; and
when the composition contains greater than 10 weight percent of cleansing surfactant, the weight ratio of betaine surfactant to taurate surfactant is from 80:20: to 20:80;
wherein the composition further comprises electrolyte;
wherein the personal cleansing composition is essentially free of a cationic derivative of guar gum;
wherein the composition is essentially free of (meth)acrylate polymers and copolymers;
wherein the composition is essentially free of sulfate surfactant.

2. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the quaternary ammonium compound includes one to three long chain alkyl groups having an ester, ether or amido inter-chain linkage, wherein the alkyl groups are saturated or unsaturated.

3. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the quaternary ammonium compound comprises a mono- and/or dialkyl quat.

4. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the betaine surfactant is an amidobetaine and the taurate surfactant is an acyl taurate.

5. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the betaine surfactant comprises cocamidopropyl betaine and the taurate surfactant comprises sodium methyl cocoyl taurate.

6. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition comprises from 6 to 12 wt. % of cleansing surfactant, based on the total weight of the composition.

7. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition has an isotropic surfactant phase.

8. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition is transparent.

9. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition has a pH of 4 to 6.

10. A method of adjusting the viscosity of a composition, the method comprising the steps of:
I) providing the personal cleansing composition according to claim 1; and
II) adding electrolyte to the composition, wherein the addition of electrolyte increases the viscosity of the resulting composition.

11. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein y is 2.

12. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the betaine surfactant is represented by the general formula:


R10[C(O)NH—(CH2)y]z—N+(R11)(R12)CH2CO2−  (IV)

where R10 is C6 to C30 alkyl,
z is 0 or 1,
R11 and R12 are independently alkyl, hydroxyalkyl or carboxyalkyl of 1 to 3 carbon atoms, and
y is 2 or 3; and salts thereof.

13. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the amidoamine comprises stearamidopropyl dimethyl amine.

14. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the electrolyte comprises sodium chloride, ammonium chloride, magnesium chloride, sodium sulfate, sodium citrate, and combinations thereof.

15. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the electrolyte is present in an amount of 0.05 to 3 wt. %, based on the total weight of the personal cleansing composition.

16. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition comprises less than 0.01 wt. % of a cationic derivative of guar gum.

17. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition is free of a cationic derivative of guar gum.

18. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition comprises less than 0.001 wt. % of (meth)acrylate polymers and copolymers.

19. The personal cleansing composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition is free of (meth)acrylate polymers and copolymers.