alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS,  INC. FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000823560
<NAME>                 Medical Technology Systems, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
<CURRENCY>                                          US

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              Apr-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (256)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,267
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,059
<PP&E>                                           6,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4,744)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,243
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,039
<SALES>                                         12,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,283
<CGS>                                            6,416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,436
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                735
<DISCONTINUED>                                     701
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,436
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      16,211,975
<SECURITIES>                                   559,038
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,021,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                   210,000
<INVENTORY>                                 41,326,628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            65,294,210
<PP&E>                                       2,520,376
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,752,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,470,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,559,935
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       190,266
<OTHER-SE>                                  68,719,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,470,172
<SALES>                                      4,127,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,127,355
<CGS>                                        2,584,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,584,052
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,263,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                400,996
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            400,996
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   400,996
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                 ADVANCED ENERGY RECOVERY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


          Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and
                            Chief Executive Officer

     I, Charles A. Holtgraves, Chief Executive officer (Principal Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer), certify that this quarterly report on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ended (September 30, 2004) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and that the information contained herein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced Energy
Recovery, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the periods presented.


Date: June 15, 2005                         /s/  Charles A. Holtgraves
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Charles A. Holtgraves
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                            Medicore, Inc.

October 20, 1997


Mr. Brett D. Anderson
100 S.E. 2nd Street, Suite 3920
Miami, Florida  33131

RE:  Unit 4, 75 West Commerce Center
     2647 West 81st St., Hialeah, Florida  33016

Dear Mr. Anderson:

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of our lease of November 17, 1992, on
2647 West 81st St., Hialeah, Florida 33016, we are exercising our option to
renew the lease, for which the initial lease term ends December 11, 1997,
for an additional 5 years.

Please acknowledge receipt of this correspondence by signing the enclosed
copy and returning to me in the enclosed self-addressed, stamped envelope.

If you have any questions regarding our renewal or need any additional in-
formation, please feel free to contact either Ms. Bonnie Kaplan who is in
charge of our Medical Supply Division located at the leased property or
myself at (305) 558-4000.

Yours very truly,

/s/ Daniel R. Ouzts

Daniel R. Ouzts
Vice President/Finance

Receipt is hereby acknowledged:

/s/ Brett D. Anderson           10/27/97
-------------------------       --------
Brett D. Anderson                Date

cc:  Bonnie Kaplan, Medicore, Inc.
     Lawrence E. Jaffe, c/o Medicore, Inc.
     James Sullivan, Sullivan Realty, Inc. (via fax to (305)557-8585)

     Certified Mail-Receipt P 263 348 480

     2337 WEST 76th STREET, HIALEAH, FLORIDA  33016 . (305) 558-4000
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Elwood Shepard, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the ACompany@), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





Date: August 12, 2005

By: /s/ Elwood Shepard

Elwood Shepard

Chief Executive Officer





Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10 (B)
Management Incentive Plans



For many years the Company has established annual incentive plans for its
executive officers and other key employees. These plans provide for the payment
to the eligible employees of additional cash compensation based on Company,
divisional or individual performance as measured against criteria established at
the beginning of the year. The executive officers of the Company were eligible
for incentive compensation payments under the "1998 Executive Incentive Plan"
which provided for payments based on earnings per share and the achievement of
certain financial and other business-related objectives established at the
beginning of the year.

                                       71
<PAGE>
#### Archer Capital Fund, L.P., Respondent, v Eagle Realty, LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted June 18, 2012;

decided September 6, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 30, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00903-CV

IN RE W.O.H., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JD-25148-W

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Bridges, and Justice Stoddart

Opinion by Justice Stoddart

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the district clerk has 

failed to transmit his “Motion to Rectify Jurisdiction of a Child and Proceed through Texas 

Family Code Section 54.02” and “Motion for Bench Warrant” to the juvenile court. The Court's 

power to issue a writ of mandamus is set forth in section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code. 

Because the Dallas County District Clerk is not a judge, the district clerk falls within our 

mandamus jurisdiction only to the extent necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T 

CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b) (West 2004) (granting writ power to courts of appeals). There is no 

pending or imminent appeal of relator’s conviction, which has become final. This Court does 

not have jurisdiction over any post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding relator may seek to 

bring to collaterally attack his conviction. See TEX. CODE CRIM. P. ANN. art. 11.05 (West 2005) 

(by whom writ may be granted). Therefore, any inaction by the district clerk does not impact our 

jurisdiction.
–2–

We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

150903F.P05

/Craig Stoddart/

CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE
DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED

97-310.

#### Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Cincinnati.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-950931, C-950932 and C-950933.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 10.1 Q3 FY2013






                                                
                
TWENTY- THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Twenty-Third Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of March 1, 2013, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Employer") and John Hildebrandt ("Executive").


Recitals


		
	A)
	On June 1, 2001 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive.




		
	B)
	Said Employment Agreement has been amended on twenty-two prior occasions;




		
	C)
	Employer and Executive now desire to further amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow:




Agreement




		
	1.
	Section 3.1 of the Agreement which provides: 




3.1    Term. The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on June 1, 2001 and shall continue until March 31, 2013 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.


is hereby amended, effective March 1, 2013, to provide as follows:


3.1    Term.  The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on June 1, 2001 and shall continue until March 31, 2014 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.
 


		
	2.
	All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective.






Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.




EXECUTIVE                            EMPLOYER
PriceSmart, INC.


John Hildebrandt                    By: ____________________


______________________                Name: Jose Luis Laparte    


Its: CEO & President
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 346 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 346

 To implement equal protection under the 14th article of amendment to 
 the Constitution for the right to life of each born and preborn human 
                                person.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 29, 2009

    Mr. Wicker (for himself, Mr. Vitter, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Enzi, Mr. 
Brownback, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Thune, Mr. Coburn, and Mr. 
    Inhofe) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To implement equal protection under the 14th article of amendment to 
 the Constitution for the right to life of each born and preborn human 
                                person.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Life at Conception Act''.

SEC. 2. RIGHT TO LIFE.

    To implement equal protection for the right to life of each born 
and preborn human person, and pursuant to the duty and authority of the 
Congress, including Congress' power under article I, section 8, to make 
necessary and proper laws, and Congress' power under section 5 of the 
14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the 
Congress hereby declares that the right to life guaranteed by the 
Constitution is vested in each human being.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act:
            (1) Human person; human being.--The terms ``human person'' 
        and ``human being'' include each and every member of the 
        species homo sapiens at all stages of life, including, but not 
        limited to, the moment of fertilization, cloning, and other 
        moment at which an individual member of the human species comes 
        into being.
            (2) State.--The term ``State'' used in the 14th article of 
        amendment to the Constitution of the United States and other 
        applicable provisions of the Constitution includes the District 
        of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each other 
        territory or possession of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31(d)**

**BALTIMORE GAS ANDELECTRIC COMPANY**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, E. Follin Smith, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kof Baltimore Gas and Electric Company;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 27, 2007
| /s/ E. FOLLIN SMITH                                |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

       General Partner

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral                                   

Name: Brenda G. GujralTitle: President of the General Partner and        Principal Executive Officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P

Date: August 11, 2003
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 12

- 00668

- CV

EX PARTE John B. NOONE , Jr.

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 09095

Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 6, 2013

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Appellant has filed a certificate of

service, stating that a ppellee does not oppose the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a). Costs of appeal are tax ed against appellant. See

id. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

URIEL ANTONIO MORENO

GONZALEZ, Petitioner,

v. ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 70661 Agency No. A208

- 687

- 436

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 17, 2021 * *
Before: FERNANDEZ, BYBEE, BADE, Circuit Judges

. Uriel Antonio Moreno

- Gonzalez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withhol ding of removal, and relief under the C onvention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 25 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 70661

A gainst T orture (“CAT”)

. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. In his opening brief, Moreno

- Gonzales does not challenge the agency ’s dispositive conclusion that his proposed particular social group, “victims of police brutality,” was not cognizab le

. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072,
1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). We lack jurisdiction to consider the new proposed particular social group
Moreno

- Gonzalez raised in his opening brief, “people targeted for death by gang members who have Government Police working from them under color of law,”
because he did not raise thi s group before the agency
. S ee Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review claims not presented to the agency). Thus, Moreno

- Gonzalez’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. We lack jurisdiction to consider Moreno

- Gonzalez’s contentions as to the
IJ’ s denial of his CAT claim because he failed to challenge this decision to the
BIA

. See Barron , 358 F.3d at 677

- 78

.3 19

- 70661

We also lack jurisdiction to consider Moreno

- Gonzalez’s contention s that
the IJ misin terpreted the law and did not allow him to present evidence. See id.
As stated in the court’s Ma y 21 , 201 9 order, the temporary stay of removal
remains in p lace until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.