alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
imma_ex103.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 


Addendum to Loan Agreement (Original Agreement Date 7/31/2012)


(The “Addendum”)


 


 



	Between:	Morpheus Financial Corporation (“Lender”)
	 	 
	And:	Interactive Multi-Media Auction Corporation (“Borrower”)
	 	 
	AMENDED TERMS
	 	 
	COMPANY	Interactive Multi-Media Auction Corporation
	 	 
	LENDER	Morpheus Financial Corporation
	 	 
	AMOUNT OWING	Up to $75,000
	 	 
	INTEREST	Non-interest Bearing
	 	 
	TERMS	Unsecured loan for general working capital purposes
	 	 
	CLOSING	May 17, 2013
	 	 
	DETAILS TO AMENDMENT	On July 31, 2012, the Lender, provided a loan facility to the Borrower, of CDN$15,000, with CDN $7,500 to be advanced on or before October 15, 2012 and CDN $7,500 on or before April 30, 2013.  At the request of the Borrower, the Lender hereby now further agrees as per this Addendum, to increase the loan availability amount during the next 12 month period.  Therein, as at today’s date of May 17, 2013, the Lender agrees to increase the loan amount available to the Borrower up to an additional $75,000 available in traunches as required on request of the Borrower during the upcoming 12 month period immediately following the Addendum date.  An initial traunch of $20,000 has been requested by the Borrower and shall be released by the Lender on or before June 1, 2013.  The terms of the original loan remain intact as the entire loan amount will continue to be unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on or before October 31, 2017.







 


Dated this day of the 17th of May 2013 by:












Morpheus Financial Corporation







/MCHU/ (Electronic Approval)


Authorized Signatory












Interactive Multi-Media Auction Corporation







/AMCCANDLESS/ (Electronic Approval)


Authorized Signatory
SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA

INDIAN COMMUNITY

10,005 East Osborn Road 2 0 1909

Scottsdale, Arizona 85256

ORDINANCE NUMBER: SRO-253-99

In order to amend the provision of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Code of

Ordinances pertaining to the operation, regulation, and enforcement of Class III gaming.

BE IT ENACTED:

Chapter 15 of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Code of Ordinances is hereby

amended by adding thereto and inserting therein the highlighted working, and by deleting those

words struck through.

Sec. 15.5-17. Detention and questioning of persons suspected of violations.

(a) The authorized agents of the Community Gaming Agency or security persoimel of

the Gaming Facility (hereafter Authorities), may question any person in the

Gaming Facility who may be involved in illegal acts or who is suspected of

violating any of the provisions of the Compact or this Section 15.5-16. None of

the Authorities is criminally or civilly liable:

(1) On account of any such questioning; or

(2) For reporting to the Community Gaming Agency, the State Gaming

Agency, Community, Federal or State regulatory authorities, or law

enforcement authorities the identity of the persons suspected of the

violation.

(b) Any of the Authorities who have probable cause for believing that there has been

involvemo~it in illegal acts or a violation of the Compact or ~.is Section 15.5-16 in

the Gaming Facility by any person may take that person into custody and detain

him in the Gaming Facility in a reasonable manner and for a reasonable length of

time. Such a taking into custody and detention does not render the Authorities

criminally or civilly liable unless it is established by clear and convincing

evidence that the taking into custody and detention are unreasonable under all the

circumstances.

(c) There must be displayed in a conspicuous place in the Gaming Facility a notice in

boldface type clearly legible and in substantially this form:

Agents of the Community Gaming Agency

or any of the Authorities who have
probable cause for believing that any

person may be involved in illegal acts or

has violated any provision of applicable

law prohibiting cheating or other gaming

offense may detain that person in the

Gaming Facility.

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to authority contained in Article VII, Section 1(c) of the Constitution of the Salt River

Pima-Maricopa Indian Community ratified by the Tribe, February 28, 1990, and approved by the

Secretary of the Interior, March 19, 1990, the foregoing ordinance was adopted this 1 7th day of

March, 1999, in a duly called meeting held by the Community Council in Salt River, Arizona at

which a quorum of 8 members were present by a vote of 7 for; 0 opposed; I abstaining; I

excused.

SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA

INDIAN COMMUNITY COUNCIL

Merna Le is, Vice Pre dent

ATTEST:

Secretary

2
Exhibit 10.2

                             ORAL AGREEMENT SUMMARY

The below is a summary of the oral agreements between Mr. Blaszczak and Tenaya
Acquisitions Company regarding expenses of the offering and an acquisition.

Mr. Blaszczak has agreed to pay all the expenses of the offering estimated at
$7,504 and has in fact paid most of those fees prior to the filing of this
prospectus. Mr. Blaszczak has also agreed to pay all expenses of finding, doing
due diligence and completing an acquisition. It is anticipated that these
expenses will be between $15,000 and $20,000.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 118 (Monday, June 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14568]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration  11772 and  11773]

Florida Disaster Number FL-00043

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Florida 
(FEMA-1840-DR), dated 06/04/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Tornadoes, and Straight-line 
Winds.
    Incident Period: 05/17/2009 through 05/28/2009.
    Effective Date: 05/28/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/03/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/04/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Florida, dated 06/04/2009, is hereby amended to establish the incident 
period for this disaster as beginning 05/17/2009 and continuing through 
05/28/2009.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-14568 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
Unassociated Document


EXHIBIT (10)(113)







ALLONGE NO. 10 TO SECURED NOTE ISSUED FEBRUARY 22, 2012


 


This Allonge No. 10 to Secured Note (“Allonge”) is made as of this 21th day of June, 2013, by Attitude Drinks Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Borrower”) to Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Lender”).  Reference is hereby made to that certain Secured Note issued by Borrower to Lender dated February 22, 2012 (“Note”).  Except as amended hereby, the terms of the Note remain as originally stated.







The Principal Amount as stated on the face of the Note shall be increased to $1,372,500.00 ($175,000 – Principal Amount of Note dated February 22, 2012) + ($75,000.00 – Allonge #1 dated on or about 8/22/12) + ($150,000 – Allonge #2 dated on or about 10/15/12) + ($135,000 – Allonge #3 dated on or about 11/9/12) + ($165,000 – Allonge #4 dated on or about 12/6/12) + ($165,000 – Allonge #5 dated on or about 1/13/12) + ($220,000 – Allonge #6 dated on or about 1/14/13) + ($40,000 – Allonge #7 on or about February 15, 2013) + ($71,500 – Allonge #8 on or about 4/11/13) + ($88,000 – Allonge #9 hereto) + ($88,000 – Allonge #10 hereto).   The amendment to the Principal Amount due and owing on the Note described herein notwithstanding, Lender does not waive interest that may have accrued at a default rate of interest and liquidated damages, if any, that may have accrued on the Note through the date of this Allonge, which default interest and liquidated damages, if any, remain outstanding and payable.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Allonge is executed as of the date written above.











	
ATTITUDE DRINKS INC.

	 
	 	 	 
	
By: 

	/s/ Roy G. Warren	 
	 	Name:  Roy G. Warren	 
	 	Title:  President and CEO
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
John R. Collins, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Constellation Energy Group, Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(i)    The
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   The
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Constellation Energy
Group, Inc.

|/s/JOHN R. COLLINSJohn R. Collins
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Date:
February 27, 2008

---



QuickLinks
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0398 

_____________________________

SHAWN J. VESTAL, SR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

August 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, M.K. THOMAS, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Shawn J. Vestal, Sr., pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Adam B. Wilson, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.2  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral Partner.By:/s/ Donna UrbainName:Donna UrbainTitle:Principal Financial Officer with respect to Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.Date:May 13, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------


                  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Brent A. Latta, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     i.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     ii.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the Company.




                              /s/  Brent A. Latta
                              -----------------------------------
                              President & Chief Executive Officer



May 7, 2004




[Signed originals of these written statements required by Section 906 have
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
#### In the Matter of Perry Bellamy, Appellant, v New York City Police Department, Respondent.

Submitted April 15, 2013;

decided June 25, 2013

Motion for reargument denied *[see 20*NY3d 1028 (2013)].

Judges Rivera and Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
#### Joseph Schimicci, Jr., et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 915]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the *688defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated September 10, 2004, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the ground that it never received prior written notice of the alleged street defect at issue in this case. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the plaintiffs’ submissions in opposition to the motion, which included an expert affidavit relying upon photographs and other competent evidence, raised a triable issue of fact with regard to whether the defendant affirmatively created the alleged defect *(see e.g. Ealey v City of New York,*16 AD3d 543 [2005]; *Simpson v Tenore & Guglielmo,*287 AD2d 613 [2001]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.E, Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ, concur.
#### FORREST v. CITY COUNCIL OF CHARLESTON.

Equity. — Discontinuance of cause in equity, after framing issue for jury and fixing day for trial, may be ordered on noticed motion and payment of costs by plaintiff, there being no such progress in the cause as to entitle defendant to a decree, and no third party intervening having acquired a right to retention of case.

Before Townsend, J., Charleston, May, 1902.

Affirmed.

Action by John Forrest, M. D., against City Council of Charleston and T. Moultrie Mordecai *et*al., commissioners of the city orphan asylum. From order granting discontinuance, defendants appeal.

*Messrs. Geo. H.*Moffett, *W. A. Holman*and *Mordecai & Gadsden,*for appellants,

cite: 60 S. C., 1.

*Mr. Simeon Hyde,*contra,

cites: 2 Wait’s Prac., 600; 1 Bailey, 262; 1 Speer, 307.

March 31, 1903.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

The plaintiff, a taxpayer and resident in Charleston, brought this action 'to enjoin the city council of Charleston from appropriating the sum of $5,000 for the support of the inmates of the city orphan asylum and also to restrain the commissioners of said orphan asylum *501from contracting any further debts for the support of the said orphan asylum' upon the faith of such appropriation, basing his right to such injunction upon the ground that the city orphan asylum is a sectarian institute, under the control of the Roman Catholic Church, and that such an appropriation would be in violation of sec. 9, art. XI., of the Constitution of this State.

After issue joined, defendants, upon motion, under sec. 274 of the Code and rule 28 of the Circuit Court, obtained an order framing an issue to be submitted to a jury to ascertain whether the city orphan asylum is under the direction or control of any church or any religious denomination, society or organization. The cause was transferred to calendar No. 1 for trial of said issue by a jury, and a day during the term was fixed for trial. Before the day fixed for trial, upon motion and notice, plaintiff’s counsel obtained an order granting leave to discontinue the case on payment of costs. From this order defendants appeal upon three exceptions, which practicalfy raise but one question ■: Whether it was error to grant discontinuance in a case of equity — after the framing of an issue for trial by jury and a day for trial fixed. There was no error. The rule is well settled that a plaintiff may be granted leave, upon payment of costs, to discontinue his suit before verdict, in an action at law, and before decreee, in a suit in equity, where the cause has not so far progressed as to entitle defendant to a decree against plaintiff or a codefendant, and where no intervening party has acquired a right to a retention of the cause. *Branham*v. *Brown,*1 Bailey, 262; *Johnson*v. *Basguere,*1 Speer, 307; *Bossard*v. *Lester,*2 McCord’s Eq., 418; *Bank*v. *Rose,*1 Rich. Eq., 294; *Latimer*v. *Sullivan,*37 S. C., 120, 15 S. E., 198; 6 Ency. Pl. & Pr., 833, 834.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Conrado Pons, Appellant, v William A. Lee, Respondent.

Submitted August 27, 2012;

decided November 20, 2012

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   2-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         9,118,000
<SECURITIES>                                   112,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,723,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (140,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,231,000
<PP&E>                                          8,011,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (3,665,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 24,413,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,151,000
<BONDS>                                        15,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          6,155,000
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,274,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,195,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   24,413,000
<SALES>                                        181,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               181,000
<CGS>                                          1,457,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,698,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             312,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3,714,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3,714,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (222,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (3,936,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.48)
        


</TABLE>
FINAL REPORT1

REVISION OF THE COMMENT TO RULE OF EVIDENCE 605

On January 8, 2014, the Court rescinded the then-existing provisions of the Code 

of Judicial Conduct effective July 1, 2014, and adopted new Canons 1 through 4 of the 

Code of Judicial Conduct of 2014, also effective July 1, 2014. See 44 Pa.B. 455 

(January 25, 2014). At the direction of the Court, the Committee on Rules of Evidence 

identified and updated references to the Code of Judicial Conduct and Rules Governing 

Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges in the Comment to Rule 605. 

 

1

The Committee’s Final Report should not be confused with the official Committee 

Comments to the rules. Also note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the 

Committee’s Comments or the contents of the Committee’s explanatory Final Reports.
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-C  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 20th day of November, 2006.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-C
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-C and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-C and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.