alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT


Board of Directors
Badger Paper Mills, Inc. and Subsidiary


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Badger Paper Mills, Inc. and Subsidiary on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-01671,
effective March 13, 1996 and File No. 333-01673, effective March 13, 1996) of
our reports dated January 25, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Badger Paper Mills, Inc. for the years ended December
31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2001.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Appleton, Wisconsin
February 28, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14177]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

Times and Dates: 6 p.m., Monday, June 22, 2009; 10 a.m., Tuesday, June 
23, 2009; and 8 a.m., Wednesday, June 24, 2009.

Place: Washington, DC., at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: 

Monday, June 22 at 6 p.m. (Closed)

    1. Financial Matters.
    2. Strategic Issues.
    3. Pricing.
    4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    5. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

Tuesday, June 23 at 10 a.m. (Closed)

    Continuation of Monday's agenda.

Wednesday, June 24 at 8 a.m. (Closed)--If Needed

    Continuation of Monday's agenda.

Contact Person for More Information: Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-14177 Filed 6-12-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,259
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,505
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,764)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,037
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,037)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,037)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,037)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, Steven A. Schumm, the Chief Administrative Officer of Enstar Income/Growth Program Six-A, L.P. (the "Partnership") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

- fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Steven A. SchummSteven A. SchummChief Administrative OfficerNovember 13, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew J. Schenker,  President and Chief Financial  Officer of DOMINIX,  INC.
(the "Company"),  hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a) the  Periodic  Report on Form  10-QSB of the  Company  for the period  ended
September  30,  2003,  which  this  certification   accompanies  (the  "Periodic
Report"),  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  section  13(a)  of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) the  information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated November 17, 2003



                /s/ Andrew J. Schenker
                ------------------------------------------
                Andrew J. Schenker
                President, Chief Executive Officer
                and Chief Financial Officer


"A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to DOMINIX,  INC., and will be retained by DOMINIX, INC., and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request."


                                       23
UNITED STATES 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Amendment No. 1 
On

(X)  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED September 30, 2008

COMMISSION FILE NO.

mPhase Technologies, Inc.

|NEW
    JERSEY                           | 22-2287503            
|---------------------------------------- | ----------------------
|(State
    or other jurisdiction of      | (I.R.S.
    Employer  
|incorporation or organization)           | Identification Number)
|                                         |                       
|587
    CONNECTICUT AVE., NORWALK, CT    | 06854-1711            
|(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip
    Code)        

ISSUER'S TELEPHONE NUMBER,(203) 838-2741

INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE
REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR
SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORT), AND (2)
HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS.

YES

THE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING OF
EACH OF THE REGISTRANT'S CLASSES OF COMMON STOCK AS OF NOVEMBER 14, 2008 IS
544,239,955 SHARES, ALL OF ONE CLASS OF $.01 STATED VALUE COMMON STOCK.

---



mPhase Technologies,
Inc., a New Jersey corporation, is filing this Amendment No. 1 to our Form 10Q/A
solely for the purpose of correction of the Certifications required by Item 302
of Regulation SK of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.



---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the
requirements of the Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant, has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



|Dated: March 13, 2009 | mPHASE TECHNOLOGIES,
    INC.
|--------------------- | -----------------------------
|                      |                              
|                      | By: /s/ Martin S. Smiley     
|                      | Martin S. Smiley             
|                      | Executive Vice President     
|                      | Chief Financial Officer and  
|                      | General Counsel              
|                      |                              
|                      |                              

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-21305 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v. WILLIAM CARL BROWN

Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-511-ALL

-------------------- September 16, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * William Carl Brown appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty-plea conviction for two counts of theft of government funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. Brown argues that the district court abused its discretion in departing upward based on its finding that Brown’s criminal history category underrepresented the seriousness of his past criminal conduct. The district court explained that theNo. 01-21305 -2- upward departure was based on Brown’s extensive criminal history, the nature of Brown’s prior offenses, and his violent assaults against women. The district court also considered the fact that at the time that Brown committed the instant offense, he was awaiting sentencing for five state guilty-plea convictions for possession of cocaine, forgery, distribution of cocaine, aggravated assault, and attempted theft. The district court provided acceptable reasons for the departure, and the departure was reasonable. See United States v. McKenzie , 991 F.2d 203, 204 (5th Cir. 1993); see also United States v. Lambert , 984 F.2d 658, 662-63 (5th Cir. 1993) ( en banc ). Therefore, the sentence imposed by the district court is AFFIRMED.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DAYNA BLYTHE ANDERSSON

, Appellant,

v.

ULF PATRICK ANDERSSON

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1497

[ March 1, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit,

County ; Kathleen J. Kroll , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2014DR011721XXXXNB

.

Troy William Klein, West Palm Beach , for appellant.

Ulf Patrick Andersso n, Nässjö, Sweden, for pro se.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
PCX Equities

Annual CEO Certification(Rule 5.3(m))

As the Chief Executive Officer of The Fairchild Corporation, and as required by Rule 5.3(m) of PCX Equities, Inc. (PCXE), I hereby certify that as of the date hereof I am not aware of any violation by the Company of PCXEs Corporate Governance listing standards, other than has been disclosed to PCXE pursuant to rule 5.3(m) and descried on Exhibit C to the Companys Rule 5.3(k)(5)(D) Annual Written Affirmation.

By:                         /s/ JEFFREY J. STEINER

Print Name:           Jeffrey J. Steiner

Title:                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date:                     February 16, 2005

Note: THE PCXE WILL NOT ACCEPT IF RETYPED, MODIFIED OR IF ANY TEXT IS DELETED. If you have any questions regarding applicability to your companys circumstances, please call the Listings Department prior to submission.
National Indian Gaming Commission

Tribal Gaming Revenues (in thousands) by Region

Fiscal Year 2003 and 2002 

Fiscal Year 2003 Fiscal Year 2002 Increase (decreas

Number of 

Operations 

Gaming 

Revenues 

Number of 

Operations 

Gaming 

Revenues 

Number of 

Operations 

Gaming Revenu

Region I 43 1,439,516 47 1,230,194 (4) Region II 54 4,699,889 51 3,678,095 3 1Region III 43 1,898,522 40 1,782,874 3 Region IV 91 3,547,360 109 3,537,227 (18) Region V 75 822,727 79 651,841 (4) Region VI 24 4,322,134 22 3,835,825 2 Totals 330 16,730,148 348 14,716,056 (18) 2

Source: Compiled from gaming operation audit reports received and entered by the NIGC through June 30, 200

Region I Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. 

Region II California, Northern Nevada. Region III Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Southern Nevada. Region IV Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska, Region V South Dakota, and Wisconsin Region VI Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

96-2143.

#### State ex rel. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Ohio v. Montgomery.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal, *a*

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                             OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                                       205,147
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             205,542
<PP&E>                                                        13,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                                13,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               205,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         18,059
<BONDS>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                       1,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    26,022
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 205,542
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               2,138
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               5,945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (3,807)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (3,807)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Elwood Shepard, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this 10-Q of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc.;   2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading;   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;   4. The registrant's certifying officer:   A. is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls;  B. has designed such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the issuer and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to such officers by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are being prepared;  C. has evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's internal controls as of a date within 90 days prior to the report; and  D. has presented in the report his conclusions about the effectiveness of his internal controls based on their evaluation as of that date;   5. The registrant's certifying officer has disclosed to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):  A. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  B. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls; and   6. the signing officer has indicated in the report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.   Date: August 8, 2012  /s/ Elwood Shepard Elwood Shepard President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Walter Pendleton, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 908]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated September 24, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

At a hearing conducted pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act *(see*Correction Law art 6-C; hereinafter *601SORA), to determine the defendant’s SORA risk level, the defendant requested that the County Court downwardly depart from his presumptive risk level. Although the defendant identified the existence of an appropriate mitigating factor that could provide a basis for a discretionary downward departure *(see*Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 17 [2006]; *People v Perez,*104 AD3d 746 [2013]; *People v Migliaccio,*90 AD3d 879, 880 [2011]; *People v Washington,*84 AD3d 910 [2011]), he failed to establish the facts in support of its existence by a preponderance of the evidence *(see People v Perez,*104 AD3d at 746-747; *People v Wyatt,*89 AD3d 112, 128 [2011]). In that respect, while the case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders indicated that the defendant had completed alcohol and substance abuse treatment, and had participated in sex offender treatment, the case summary did not show that the defendant’s response to treatment was exceptional, and the defendant did not submit any other evidence to so demonstrate *(see People v Perez,*104 AD3d at 747; *People v Watson,*95 AD3d 978 [2012]). Accordingly, the court lacked the discretion to downwardly depart from the presumptive risk level *(see People v Martinez,*104 AD3d 924, 925 [2013]; *People v Peeples,*98 AD3d 491 [2012]; *People v Wyatt,*89 AD3d at 128, 130). Skelos, J.E, Cohen, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.3

                  MISCELLANEOUS FRINGE BENEFITS FOR EXECUTIVES


   BLANKET TRAVEL ACCIDENT INSURANCE

   For those employees who are required to travel in carrying out their job
   responsibilities, the Company provides at no cost a travel accident
   insurance plan.  The coverage is based on position title with Senior Vice
   Presidents insured for $200,000 and the Chairman of the Board for
   $400,000.  This plan provides coverage for accidental death while
   traveling and while away from home on Company business.

   PERSONAL EXCESS LIABILITY POLICIES

   The Company reimburses certain executive officers for the cost of personal
   excess liability policies.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-81,540-01

EX P ARTE LINDA MARIE Mc KU SICK, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1415839-A IN THE 183RD DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas C o d e o f C ri minal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was con v icted of possessing a controlled substanc e and w as sentenc ed to imprisonment. There was no dire ct appe al. Applicant was arr ested in Webster, Texas, for possessing methamphetamine. The arr esting office r repor

ted that the substance had a weight of approximately 3.5 g rams. Applicant was there fore indicted for possessi n g 1 -4 grams of methamphetamine, which is a third-degree felony

. T E X . C O N T R O L L E D S U B S . A C T §§ 481.102(6), 481.115(a) , (c)

. She pled guilty under a plea agree ment for three y ear s in prison.-2-

At the time of Applicant’s plea, no laboratory analy sis had been perf ormed on the substance. L ater analy sis showed that the substance was methamphetamine but that its weight was far from the 3.5 g rams repor

ted by the arr esting office r. The true weight was 0.039 g rams. Poss es s ing this quantity of methamphetamine does not c onstitut e a third-degree felony , but it is a state-jail felony

. T E X . C O N T R O L L E D S U B S . A C T §§ 481.102(6), 481.115( a), (b). Applicant, throug h habea s counsel, alleg es that her plea was not voluntary : “My plea was not knowing and voluntary beca use I did not know that the evidenc e I was char g ed with possessing did not contain coca ine. I f I had known this, I would not have enter ed a gu i l t y plea.” A revie w of the

rec ord does not show that Applicant’s prosec ution had any thing to do with coca ine. Nonethele ss, the trial court finds, with the State’s assent, “B ased on the discrepa ncies i n the actua l amount of controlled substance possessed by the applicant versus the amount nece ssary to support a conviction for the char g ed offe nse and the applicant’ s understanding conce rning t h e relevant rang es of punishment, the applicant’ s plea was not knowing ly and voluntarily ent er ed

. ” The trial court’s findingis supported by

the re cord. Relief is g rante d. See , e.g. , Ex parte Golden , 991 S.W .2d 859, 862 n . 2 (T ex . C ri m. App. 1999). The judgme nt in Cause No. 1415839-01010 in the 183rd District Court of Har ris County is

s et aside, and Applicant is rema nded to the custody of the Sheriff of Har ris County to answe r t h e char g es as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any nece ssary bench war rant within 10 day s after

the mandate of this Court issues. Cop ie s o f th is o p in io n s h a ll be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Deliver ed: September

17, 2014 Do not publish