Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules 26823 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 0023.1, 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD which guides the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions which do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment because it 

simply promulgates the operating 

regulations or procedures for 

drawbridges. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 

Bridges. 

Regulations 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: 

PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE 

OPERATION REGULATIONS 

1. The authority citation for part 117 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 

CFR 1.05–1(g). 

2. Revise § 117.337 as follows: 

§ 117.337 Trout River. 

The draw of the CSX Railroad Bridge 

across the Trout River, mile 0.9 at 

Jacksonville, operates as follows: 

The bridge is not tender. 

(a) The draw is normally in the fully 

open position, displaying green lights to 

indicate that vessels may pass. 

(b) As a train approaches, provided 

the scanners do not detect a vessel 

under the draw, the lights change to 

flashing red and a horn continuously 

sounds while the draw closes. The draw 

remains closed until the train passes. 

(c) After the train clears the bridge, 

the lights continue to flash red and the 

horn again continuously sounds while 

the draw opens, until the draw is fully 

open and the lights return to green. 

Dated: May 12, 2009. 

R.S. Branham, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, 

Seventh Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. E9–12979 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2009–0342] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zones; Annual Events 

Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain 

of the Port Lake Michigan Zone 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR Part 165 to amend the 

rules that restrict vessels from portions 

of water areas during events that pose a 

hazard to public safety. The safety zones 

proposed in this rulemaking are 

necessary to protect spectators, 

participants, and vessels from the 

hazards associated with fireworks 

displays, air shows, and other events. 

DATES: Comments and related materials 

must reach the Coast Guard on or before 

July 6, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by Coast Guard docket 

number USCG–2009–0342 to the Docket 

Management Facility at the U.S. 

Department of Transportation. To avoid 

duplication, please use only one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Online: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(3) Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on 

the Ground Floor of the West Building, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The telephone 

number is 202–366–9329. 

(4) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call BM2 Adam Kraft, Prevention 

Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake 

Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747– 

7154. If you have questions on viewing 

or submitting material to the docket, call 

Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2009–0342), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a telephone number in the 

body of your document so that we can 

contact you if we have questions 

regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, select the 

Advanced Docket Search option on the 

right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG– 

2009–0342’’ in the Docket ID box, press 

Enter, and then click on the balloon 

shape in the Actions column. If you 

submit your comments by mail or hand 

delivery, submit them in an unbound 

format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, 

suitable for copying and electronic 

filing. If you submit comments by mail 

and would like to know that they 

reached the Facility, please enclose a 

stamped, self-addressed postcard or 

envelope. We will consider all 

comments and material received during 

the comment period and may change 

the rule based on your comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, select the 

Advanced Docket Search option on the 

right side of the screen, insert USCG– 

2009–0342 in the Docket ID box, press 

Enter, and then click on the item in the 

Docket ID column. You may also visit 

the Docket Management Facility in 

Room W12–140 on the ground floor of 

the Department of Transportation West 

Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

26824 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. We have an 

agreement with the Department of 

Transportation to use the Docket 

Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008 issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one to the Docket Management 

Facility at the address under ADDRESSES

explaining why one would be 

beneficial. If we determine that one 

would aid this rulemaking, we will hold 

one at a time and place announced by 

a later notice in the Federal Register. 

Background and Purpose 

This rule proposes the amendment of 

regulations in § 165.929, Annual Events 

requiring safety zones in the Captain of 

the Port Lake Michigan zone. This rule 

proposes the removal of three events 

that do not require establishment of a 

safety zone; revising the location of 

three safety zones, revising the 

enforcement date and time of two safety 

zones; and the addition of three 

recurring safety zones. These safety 

zones are necessary to protect vessels 

and people from the hazards associated 

with fireworks displays. Such hazards 

include obstructions to the waterway 

that may cause marine casualties and 

the explosive danger of fireworks and 

debris falling into the water that may 

cause death or serious bodily harm. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The proposed rule and associated 

safety zones are necessary to ensure the 

safety of vessels and people during 

events in the Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan area of responsibility that may 

pose a hazard to the public. The 

proposed safety zones will be enforced 

only immediately before and during 

events that pose a hazard to the public. 

If the event concludes prior to the 

scheduled termination time, the Coast 

Guard will cease enforcement of the 

safety zone and will announce that fact 

via Broadcast Notice to Mariners or 

Local Notice to Mariners. 

Regulatory Evaluation 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, 

Regulatory Planning and Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office 

of Management and Budget has not 

reviewed it under that Order. 

The Coast Guard’s use of these safety 

zones will be periodic in nature, of short 

duration, and designed to minimize the 

impact on navigable waters. These 

safety zones will only be enforced 

immediately before and during the time 

the events are occurring. Furthermore, 

these safety zones have been designed to 

allow vessels to transit unrestricted to 

portions of the waterways not affected 

by the safety zones. The Coast Guard 

expects insignificant adverse impact to 

mariners from the activation of these 

safety zones. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. 

This proposed rule would affect the 

following entities, some of which might 

be small entities: The owners and 

operators of vessels intending to transit 

or anchor in the areas designated as 

safety zones during the dates and times 

the safety zones are being enforced. 

These safety zones would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities for 

the following reasons. The safety zones 

in this proposed rule would be in effect 

for short periods of time and only once 

per year. The safety zones have been 

designed to allow traffic to pass safely 

around the zone whenever possible and 

vessels will be allowed to pass through 

the zones with the permission of the 

Captain of the Port. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact BM2 Adam 

Kraft, Prevention Department, Coast 

Guard Sector Lake Michigan, 

Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747–7154. The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this rule or any policy or action 

of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule calls for no new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for 

Federalism under Executive Order 

13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial 

direct effect on State or local 

governments and would either preempt 

State law or impose a substantial direct 

cost of compliance on them. We have 

analyzed this proposed rule under that 

Order and have determined that it does 

not have implications for Federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 or more in any one year. 

Though this proposed rule will not 

result in such an expenditure, we do 

discuss the effects of this proposed rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule will not effect the 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules 26825 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This proposed rule is not an 

economically significant rule and does 

not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

The Coast Guard recognizes the treaty 

rights of Native American Tribes. 

Moreover, the Coast Guard is committed 

to working with Tribal Governments to 

implement local policies and to mitigate 

tribal concerns. We have determined 

that these safety zones and fishing rights 

protection need not be incompatible. 

We have also determined that this 

Proposed Rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

Nevertheless, Indian Tribes that have 

questions concerning the provisions of 

this Proposed Rule or options for 

compliance are encouraged to contact 

the point of contact listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD and Department of 

Homeland Security Management 

Directive 023–01, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is not likely to have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. A preliminary 

environmental analysis check list 

supporting this preliminary 

determination is available in the docket 

where indicated under ADDRESSES. We 

seek any comments or information that 

may lead to the discovery of a 

significant environmental impact from 

this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

2. In § 165.929 make the following 

amendments: 

a. In paragraph (a)(4), revise 

paragraph (ii). 

b. In paragraph (a)(11), revise 

paragraph (i). 

c. In paragraph (a)(15), revise 

paragraph (ii). 

d. In paragraph (a)(26), revise 

paragraph (i). 

e. In paragraph (a), revise paragraph 

(33). 

f. In paragraph (a), remove and reserve 

paragraph (37). 

g. In paragraph (a), revise paragraph 

(38). 

h. In paragraph (a)(49), revise 

paragraph (i). 

i. In paragraph (a), add paragraph (67). 

The amendments read as follows: 

§ 165.929 Safety Zones; Annual events 

requiring safety zones in the Captain of the 

Port Lake Michigan zone. 

(a) * * * 

(4) * * * 

(ii) Enforcement date and time. The 

second Saturday of May; 8 a.m. to 5 

p.m. 

* * * * * 

(11) * * * 

(i) Location. All waters of the Grand 

River within the arc of a circle with a 

500-foot radius from the fireworks 

launch site located on a barge in 

position 43°04′24′′ N, 086°12′17′′ W 

(NAD 83). 

* * * * * 

(15) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(ii) Enforcement date and time. July 3; 

9 p.m. to 11 p.m., July 4; 9 p.m. to 11 

p.m., and July 5; 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. 

* * * * * 

(26) * * * 

(i) Location. All waters of Muskegon 

Lake within the arc of a circle with a 

1,000-foot radius from a fireworks 

launch site located on a barge in 

position 43°14′13′′ N, 086°15′54′′ W 

(NAD 83). 

* * * * * 

(33) New Buffalo Independence Day 

Fireworks; New Buffalo, IN. 

(i) Location. All waters of Lake 

Michigan and New Buffalo Harbor 

within the arc of a circle with a 1,000- 

foot radius from the fireworks launch 

site located in position 41°48′09′′ N, 

086°44′49′′ W (NAD 83). 

(ii) Enforcement date and time. The 

first Friday after July 4; 9 p.m. to 11 

p.m. 

* * * * * 

(37) [Reserved] 

(38) Gills Rock July 4th Fireworks; 

Gills Rock, WI. 

(i) Location. All waters of Green Bay, 

in the vicinity of Hedgehog Harbor, 

within the arc of a circle with a 800-foot 

radius from the fireworks launch site 

located on a in position 45°17′20′′ N, 

087°01′32′′ W (NAD 83). 

(ii) Enforcement date and time. July 4; 

9 p.m. to 11 p.m. If the July 4 fireworks 

26826 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules 

are cancelled due to inclement weather, 

then this section will be enforced July 

5; 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. 

* * * * * 

(49) * * * 

(i) Location. All waters of Muskegon 

Lake within the arc of a circle with a 

1,000-foot radius from a fireworks barge 

located in position 43°14′13′′ N, 

086°15′54′′ W (NAD 83). 

* * * * * 

(67) Sister Bay Marina Fest Fireworks; 

Sister Bay, WI. 

(i) Location. All waters of Green Bay, 

in the vicinity of Sister Bay, within the 

arc of a circle with a 800-foot radius 

from the fireworks launch site located 

on a boat in position 45°11′30′′ N, 

087°07′20′′ W (NAD 83). 

(ii) Enforcement date and time. The 

Saturday prior to Labor Day; 9 p.m. to 

11 p.m. 

* * * * * 

Dated: May 7, 2009. 

Bruce C. Jones, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Lake Michigan. 

[FR Doc. E9–12985 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 09–1126; MB Docket No. 08–117; RM– 

11450] 

Television Broadcasting Services; St. 

Paul, MN 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Dismissal. 

SUMMARY: The Commission dismisses 

the pending rulemaking petition filed by 

Twin Cities Public Television, Inc. 

(‘‘Twin Cities’’), the licensee of 

noncommercial educational station 

KTCI–TV, analog channel *17 and 

KTCI–DT, pre-transition digital channel 

*16, and permittee of post-transition 

digital channel *26, St. Paul, Minnesota, 

to substitute digital channel *38 for its 

assigned post-transition digital channel 

*26. Duluth-Superior Area Educational 

Television Corporation (‘‘DuluthSuperior’’), the licensee of 

noncommercial educational station 

WDSE–TV/DT, Duluth, Minnesota, filed 

comments and a counterproposal in the 

proceeding. Twin Cities and DuluthSuperior subsequently came to a 

Commission approved agreement by 

which Duluth-Superior agreed to 

withdraw its counterproposal and Twin 

Cities agreed to request a different posttransition digital channel substitution. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joyce L. Bernstein, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–1600. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Order, 

MB Docket No. 08–117, adopted May 

18, 2009, and released May 22, 2009. 

The full text of this document is 

available for public inspection and 

copying during normal business hours 

in the FCC’s Reference Information 

Center at Portals II, CY–A257, 445 12th 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. 

This document will also be available via 

ECFS (http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). 

(Documents will be available 

electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/ 

or Adobe Acrobat.) This document may 

be purchased from the Commission’s 

duplicating contractor, Best Copy and 

Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., 

Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, 

telephone 1–800–478–3160 or via e-mail 

http://www.BCPIWEB.com. To request 

this document in accessible formats 

(computer diskettes, large print, audio 

recording, and Braille), send an e-mail 

to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the 

Commission’s Consumer and 

Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 

418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 

(TTY). This document does not contain 

information collection requirements 

subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act 

of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition, 

therefore, it does not contain any 

information collection burden ‘‘for 

small business concerns with fewer than 

25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small 

Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, 

Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to 

this proceeding. 

This document is not subject to the 

Congressional Review Act. (The 

Commission, is, therefore, not required 

to submit a copy of this Order to the 

Government Accountability Office, 

pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) since this 

proposed rule is dismissed, herein.) 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Clay C. Pendarvis, 

Associate Chief, Video Division, Media 

Bureau. 

[FR Doc. E9–13052 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 09–1125; MB Docket No. 09–71; RM– 

11533] 

Television Broadcasting Services; St. 

Paul, MN 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Commission requests 

comments on a channel substitution 

proposed by Twin Cities Public 

Television, Inc. (‘‘Twin Cities’’), the 

licensee of noncommercial educational 

station KTCI–TV, analog channel *17 

and KTCI–DT, pre-transition digital 

channel *16, and permittee of posttransition digital channel *26, St. Paul, 

Minnesota. Twin Cities requests the 

substitution of digital channel *23 for 

its assigned post-transition digital 

channel *26 at St. Paul. 

DATES: Comments must be filed on or 

before June 19, 2009, and reply 

comments on or before June 29, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, Office of the Secretary, 

445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20554. In addition to filing comments 

with the FCC, interested parties should 

serve counsel for petitioner as follows: 

Lawrence Miller, Esq., Schwartz, Woods 

& Miller, Suite 610, The Lion Building, 

1233 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 

20036–7322. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joyce L. Bernstein, 

joyce.bernstein@fcc.gov, Media Bureau, 

(202) 418–1600. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 

09–71, adopted May 18, 2009, and 

released May 22, 2009. The full text of 

this document is available for public 

inspection and copying during normal 

business hours in the FCC’s Reference 

Information Center at Portals II, CY– 

A257, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. This document 

will also be available via ECFS (http:// 

www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents 

will be available electronically in ASCII, 

Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This 

document may be purchased from the 

Commission’s duplicating contractor, 

Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th 

Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, telephone 

1–800–478–3160 or via e-mail http:// 

www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this 

document in accessible formats 

(computer diskettes, large print, audio