alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lyon *v.*Union Pac. Ry. Co.

*(Circuit Court, D. Colorado.*

May 11, 1888.)

Railroad Companies—Accidents to Trains—Pleading.

A complaint alleged in substance that plaintiff was an express messenger on defendant’s train of cars: that the air-brake apparatus of the several coaches were different and not adjustable, and that by roasoft thereof, when the train was stopped at B. and the engine del ached, the brakes were not set, and the train, by force of gravity, moved down a steep grade, and was thrown from the track, and plaintiff was injured; and also alleged that the accident occurred through defendant’s employes negligently leaving the train without setting the brakes, *field,*that the complaint stated a good cause of action.

At Law. Action for damages. On demurrer to complaint.

*G. M. Campbell,*for plaintiff.

*Teller &*Orahood, for defendant.

Beisweb, ,T.

In *Lyon, Conservator of Edward S. Kelly, a lunatic,*v. *Union Pacific Mailway Co.,*is a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The chief vice of the complaint, as I. read it, is that there are too many words in it. It is very diffuse and prolix. I know that some people can shoot an idea at you in a single sentence, short and pithy, and others take a whole page to express the same idea. Of course the former is much pleasanter to examine, but the mere matter of form is not sufficient to sustain an objection to a complaint good in substance; and while it is not very easy to extract from this complaint the pith of it, I. think it may be boiled down to about this: That the lunatic, whose conservator the plaintiff is, was an express messenger on the defendant’s train. As such express messenger he has all the rights of a passenger without pay. He •was riding on a mixed train. The train was made up of coaches; some belonging to the defendant and some to the Denver & Rio Grande Railway Company. The air brake apparatus of the respective coaches were different and not adjustable one to another, in consequence whereof, when the train stopped at Breckenridge and the locomotive was detached, the brakes were not set, and the train, by force of gravity, started off' down a steep lull, and was thrown from the track, and Mr. Kelly injured. That is the iirst count. The second count is that the defendant negligently employed incompetent and unskillful agents and servants, and that one of these incompetent agents negligently left the train without setting the hand brakes; in consequence whereof, when the engine was detached, the train went off, the car was thrown from the track, and Mr. Kelly injured. The first count charges the use of defective appliances, and the second the negligent employment of unskillful agents and servants, in consequence of which Mr. Kelly, the lunatic, was injured. Now, if this is the gist and pith of this complaint and its two counts, I think it will have to be adjudged that it states a cause of action, and the demurrer will be overruled; defendant to answer in 20 days.
<PAGE>




                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                  SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Owned By                                                      Jurisdiction of
Registrant                                                    Incorporation                  Percentage
----------                                                    ---------------                ----------
<S>                                                                                              <C>
Dialysis Corporation of America                               Florida                            60.8%

DCA of Homerville, LLC(1)                                     Delaware                           60.8%

DCA Medical Services, Inc.(1)                                 Florida                            60.8%

DCA of Central Valdosta, LLC(2)                               Georgia                            42.6%

DCA of Fitzgerald, LLC(2)                                     Georgia                            42.6%

DCA of Hawkinsville, LLC(1)                                   Georgia                            60.8%

DCA of SO. GA., LLC(1)                                        Georgia                            60.8%

DCA of Royston, LLC(1)                                        Georgia                            60.8%

DCA of Lawrenceburg, LLC(3)                                   Indiana                            36.5%

DCA of Chevy Chase, LLC(4)                                    Maryland                           48.6%

DCA of Manahawkin, Inc.(4)                                    New Jersey                         48.6%

DCA of Vineland, LLC(5)                                       New Jersey                         31.0%

DCA of Cincinnati, LLC(3)                                     Ohio                               36.5%

DCA of Carlisle, Inc.(4)                                      Pennsylvania                       48.6%

DCA of Chambersburg, Inc.(4)                                  Pennsylvania                       48.6%

DCA of Lemoyne, Inc.(1)                                       Pennsylvania                       60.8%

DCA of Mechanicsburg, LLC(1)                                  Pennsylvania                       60.8%

DCA of Wellsboro, Inc.(1)                                     Pennsylvania                       60.8%

DCA of Warsaw, LLC                                            Virginia                           60.8%
</TABLE>

---------------
(1)      Owned 100% by Dialysis Corporation of America.
(2)      Owned 70% by Dialysis Corporation of America.
(3)      Owned 60% by Dialysis Corporation of America.
(4)      Owned 80% by Dialysis Corporation of America.
(5)      Owned 51% by Dialysis Corporation of America.



<PAGE>
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-D ("Issuer") for the period
ending  March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 13th day of May, 2005.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-D
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-D and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-D and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Facebook Live: Childhood Irritability

### ** Date      

### ** Location

## Overview

Many children go through periods of moodiness, but children with irritability experience severe symptoms that can lead to significant problems at home and school. The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) hosted a Facebook Live event on childhood irritability featuring NIMH expert Melissa Brotman, Ph.D., chief of the Neuroscience and Novel Therapeutics Unit in the Intramural Research Program.

During the event, Dr. Brotman discussed symptoms of irritability, why it's important to study irritability, NIMH-supported research in this area, and new treatments for severe irritability in youth.

## Recording

Read the transcript.
#### Dianne ANDERSON-DELOATCH, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent.

No. 05-3328.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 9, 2006.

Before SCHALL, LINN, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

*Judgment*

PER CURIAM

*This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:*

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
#### In the Matter of South Island Orthopaedic Group, P.C., Appellant, v Thomas P. DiNapoli, as Comptroller of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Submitted May 29, 2012;

decided June 28, 2012

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and is not an order of the type provided for in CPLR 5602 (a) (2).
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about October 29, 2009 (the
“Report”), I, Peter S. Kraus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Exchange Act; and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date:   October
      29, 2009
              /s/ Peter S. KrausPeter
      S. KrausChief
      Executive OfficerAllianceBernstein
      Holding L.P.
# Vol! of1 lO*V */¥
COA # 10-13-00153-CR OFFENSE: Theft 

## STYLE: Donald Eugene Mims v. TheState ofTexas COUNTY: Brazos TRIAL COURT: 

### TRIAL COURT #: TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Hon. J. P. Langley DISPOSITION: Affirmed 85th District Court 10-03653-CRF-85

DATE: June 26, 2014 

### JUSTICE: ChiefJustice Gray PC PUBLISH: CLK RECORD: RPT RECORD: STATE BR: APP BR: DNP: 

### May 21, 2013 November 20, 2013 

### May 15, 2014 

### February 18, 2014 FOR REHEARING IS: 

### DATE: JUDGE: MOTION

SUPP CLK RECORD: SUPP RPT RECORD: SUPP BR: CORRECTED BR: March 4, 2014



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
AfPFLLMTS Petition FORDISCRETIONARY REVIEW INCCA IS: 

# re.fl><eW 

# DATE: A*. //? . -ZO/y JUDGE: /°<C

CCAIS:. JUDGE: />"
MOTION FOR REHEARING IN ON 

### CCA# Disposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PC: PUBLISH: DNP:

-— MOTION FOR 

### STAY OF MANDATE IS: ON JUDGE: 

# VoL I of2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000851724
<NAME>                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHIP II-G

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                     502,847
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              634,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,137,521
<PP&E>                                  23,729,115
<DEPRECIATION>                          19,784,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           5,183,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       56,114
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                               5,069,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             5,183,892
<SALES>                                  2,593,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,607,020
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,621,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            985,480
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        985,480
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               985,480
<EPS-BASIC>                                 2.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0



</TABLE>
#### Town of Oyster Bay, Appellant, v Lizza Industries, Inc., Respondent. (And Other Actions.)

Submitted June 24, 2013;

decided August 22, 2013

Motion by Associated General Contractors of New York State, LLC for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeals herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and nine copies filed within seven days.
#### In the Matter of Anthony H. Linnen, Appellant, v Albert Prack, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Submitted August 27, 2012;

decided November 20, 2012

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the February 2012 Appellate Division judgment, dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 Pd]). The prior motion for leave to appeal made at the Appellate Division was untimely. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the June 2012 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Growth in Gaming Revenues

(in billions)

$8.5

$9.8 $11.0

$12.8

$14.7

$16.8

$19.5

$22.6

$24.9 

$0$5

$10$15$20$25$30

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Second Lease Amendment



 Exhibit 10.33 
 SECOND LEASE AMENDMENT 
 THIS LEASE AMENDMENT dated June 18, 2013 by and between
CRYO-CELL INTERNTIONAL, INC. hereinafter referred to as “Tenant” and EJB BROOKER CREEK, LLC, as successor of Brooker Creek North I, LLLP, hereinafter referred to as “Landlord”. 

WHEREAS, Tenant and Landlord did make and execute a Lease Agreement dated April 21, 2004 which was amended June 7, 2006 for premises
located at 700 Brooker Creek Blvd., Suite 1800, Oldsmar, Florida (the “Lease”). 
 NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the
premises hereof, the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant do hereby agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Landlord and Tenant do hereby acknowledge and agree that the Lease obligations on the 9,600 SF Expansion Space shall be terminated and of no further force and effect as
of May 1, 2013 upon receipt of a $150,000.00 termination fee less $41,769.64, which includes the May 2013 and June 2013 rent payments and the security deposit, within thirty (30) days of execution of this amendment. 


 

	 	2.	The lease term on the remaining 17,600 SF will be extended through December 31, 2015. 


 

	 	3.	The base rental rate for the 17,600 SF will be as follows: 

  

					
		 	Base Rent/SF/Year	 	Monthly
	5/13 – 12/13	 	  9.84	 	14,432.00
	1/14 – 12/14	 	10.14	 	14,872.00
	1/15 – 12/15	 	10.44	 	15,312.00

  

	 	4.	Tenant will be provided the option to renew and extend the lease for two (2) consecutive terms of six (6) months each exercisable upon written notice to Landlord at
least 90 prior to expiration of the then current lease term. Should the renewal option be exercised, the base rental rate will continue to escalate 3% annually. 


 

	 	5.	Except as hereby amended, the Initial Lease remains unchanged and in full force and effect. 

 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first written above. 
  

							
	WITNESS	 		 		 	TENANT: CRYO-CELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
				
	 /s/ Jill Taymans
	 		 		 	 /s/ Mark Portnoy

		 		 		 	Signature
	V.P. Finance/CFO	 		 		 	Co-CEO
		 		 		 	Title
				
		 		 		 	LANDLORD: EJB BROOKER CREEK, LLC
				
	  
	 		 		 	  

		 		 		 	Signature
				
	  
	 		 		 	  

		 		 		 	Title
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies,
Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Amendment No. 7 to Form 10Q/A for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Martin S Smiley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s/ Martin S.
SmileyMartin S .Smiley Chief Financial Officer

February 11, 2011

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3313 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3313

    To withdraw certain land located in Clark County, Nevada, from 
location, entry, and patent under the mining laws and disposition under 
   all laws pertaining to mineral and geothermal leasing or mineral 
                   materials, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 2010

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To withdraw certain land located in Clark County, Nevada, from 
location, entry, and patent under the mining laws and disposition under 
   all laws pertaining to mineral and geothermal leasing or mineral 
                   materials, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sloan Hills Withdrawal Act''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF SLOAN HILLS AREA OF CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA.

    (a) Definition of Federal Land.--In this section, the term 
``Federal land'' means the land identified as the ``Withdrawal Zone'' 
on the map entitled ``Sloan Hills Area'' and dated May 5, 2010.
    (b) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid rights in existence on the date 
of introduction of this Act, the Federal land is withdrawn from all 
forms of--
            (1) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and
            (2) disposition under all laws pertaining to mineral and 
        geothermal leasing or mineral materials.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Elwood Shepard, certify that: 1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  October 27, 2008  /s/ Elwood Shepard Elwood Shepard President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)