alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.3


AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS
AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) is made and effective on the date hereof to that Employment Agreement dated as of May
1, 2022 , (the “Employment Agreement”), between Creek Road Miners, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
and John D. Maatta (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS,
Executive has been employed by the Company pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreement; and,


 


WHEREAS
the parties desire to now amend the Employment Agreement,


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the mutual promises contained herein and of other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree to further amend the Employment Agreement
and to supersede the provisions of the Employment Agreement as follows:


 


1.
Section 2(a) is hereby amended to provide that as of May 1, 2022, the compensation payable in Series “A” preferred
shares shall be calculated at the rate of $200,000.00 per year rather than at the rate of $250,000.00 per year.


 


2.
Section 2(c) is hereby amended to provide that the percentage of shares payable as an up-listing bonus shall be reduced from five
percent (5%) to three and one third percent (3.33%).


 


3.
Section 4 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows: (i) a new Paragraph (a) is inserted, (with the other currently
existing paragraphs now becoming sequentially numbered paragraphs (b), ( c), (d), etc. The new Paragraph (a) shall read as
follows:


 


Upon
an event of Change of Control this agreement shall immediately terminate as of the date of the event of Change of Control and this agreement
shall be of no further force or effect. However, immediately prior to any event of Change of Control the provisions of Paragraph 2(c)
shall become effective and the Stock to which Employee shall be entitled to receive will be calculated as of the date of the Change of
Control. Aside from calculation of shares under such Paragraph 2(c), and the payment to Executive of any accrued vacation time, which
shall be payable in Preferred Class A Stock issued by the Company, there shall be no further obligations including but not limited to
any further financial obligations of any nature owed or payable to Executive. Executive hereby acknowledges that except as stated herein,
the Company owes no obligations of any nature to him and hereby waives and relinquishes any and all rights or entitlements of any nature
whatsoever that may be owed to him by the Company except as expressly stated in this Amendment.


 


“Change
of Control” shall have the same meaning as defined in the Employment Agreement


 


Except
as expressly provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




    	 



    	 



    

 








IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties agree as follows:


 


	 	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 
	July
    6, 2022	 	/s/
    John D. Maatta
	 	 	John
    D. Maatta
	 	 	 
	 	 	Creek
    Road Miners, Inc.
	 	 	 
	July
    7, 2022	By:	/s/
    Paul Kessler
	 	Name:	 Paul Kessler, Chairman
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 03-2035

MS. M., as parent and next friend of K.M., a minor,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

PORTLAND SCHOOL COMMITTEE,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on March 9, 2004 is amended

as follows:

On page 8, line 2, "March 13, 2001" should be replaced with

"March 13, 2002"
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11746 and #11747]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION: 

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1837-DR), dated 05/12/2009.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes.                    

*Incident Period:*                         03/25/2009 through 03/28/2009.                    

*Effective Date:*                         06/05/2009.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         07/13/2009.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         02/12/2010.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Mississippi, dated 05/12/2009, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Jefferson Davis.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-14153 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Eric Michael WHITFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doug DRETKE, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division; Thomas A. Davis, Director, Texas Department of Public Safety Laboratory; David McEathron, Assistant Director, Texas Department of Public Safety Laboratory; Troy Scarborough, Administrator Associate; Tom Greff, Nurse Manager; Roger D. Powelek, Warden; Linda Basaldua-Cono, Licensed Vocational Nurse; Shane E. Piper, Licensed Vocational Nurse; Samuel Samora, Captain, Defendants-Appellees.

*497No. 05-50357.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 2006.

Eric Michael Whitfield, Hondo, TX, pro se.

Jason E. Magee, Office of the Attorney General Law Enforcement Defense Div., Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Eric Michael Whitfield, Texas prisoner # 1134493, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) following the district court’s certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that his appeal is not taken in good faith. Whitfield commenced this civil rights action alleging that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated when blood samples were taken from him on two occasions for the purpose of obtaining DNA information. Whitfield asserted that he was threatened with the use of force and with receiving a disciplinary violation if he did not submit to the blood tests. The district court granted the defendants’ *498motion to dismiss the action, holding that Whitfield had failed to state a claim.

Liberally construing Whitfield’s IFP application, as we must, he contends only that the district court erred in its certification decision because he stated a constitutional claim based on his having been threatened and coerced into providing DNA samples. The collection of DNA samples from prisoners under DNA collection programs is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. *See Groceman v. United States Dep’t of Justice,*354 F.3d 411, 413 (5th Cir.2004); *Velasquez v. Woods,*329 F.3d 420, 421 (5th Cir.2003). Allegations of verbal threats relating to obtaining the samples do not state a cognizable constitutional claim. *See Bender v. Brumley,*1 F.3d 271, 274 n. 4 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, Whitfield’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Therefore, his motion for leave to proceed IFP is denied, and his appeal is dismissed.

The district court’s dismissal of Whitfield’s action and our dismissal of his appeal count as two strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Whitfield is warned that should he accumulate three strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) he will be unable to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         391,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,687,600
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,937,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,120,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          554,800
<BONDS>                                      1,050,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,120,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,602,700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,412,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (19,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                21,800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             112,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 96,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             96,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    96,300
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00262-CR

Kwan Hung Ng, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-08-301833, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was due in this Court on November 10, 2010. On November 24,

2010, we notified appellant’s counsel that appellant’s brief was overdue and that if we did not

receive a satisfactory response from counsel on or before December 6, 2010, a hearing before the

district court pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) would be ordered. To date, appellant’s brief has

not been filed, nor have we received a response from counsel. 

We therefore abate the cause and remand it to the district court to hold a hearing

in accordance with rule 38.8 of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The

district court shall hold a hearing immediately to determine whether appellant still wishes to

prosecute his appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether counsel has abandoned the appeal.

See id. If appellant desires to appeal and is indigent, the district court should make appropriate
orders to ensure that appellant is adequately represented on appeal. See id. Following the hearing,

the district court should order the appropriate supplementary clerk’s and reporter’s records to be

prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than February 11, 2011. See id. 

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Abated

Filed: January 12, 2011

Do Not Publish

2
§543.4 What are the rules of interpretation and general applications for this part? 

Comparison of July TGWG Submission to 2008 Proposed MICS 

Page 1 of 1  NIGC VERSION 

11/30/2011 

On October 8, 2008, the NIGC published final Class III MICS in the Federal Register. 73 FR 

60492. The effective date of that rule has been postponed until 2012. 76 FR 53817.  In 2010, the 

NIGC posted on its web site draft Class II MICS. The Proposed MICS published in the Federal 

Register on October 8, 2008 reserved § 543.4 and the 2010 draft regulations did not suggest new 

language for the section. Because there is no draft 2010 regulation, this document will 

compare the TGWG MICS proposal to the 2008 MICS published in the Federal Register. 

Editing convention: The words in blue (underlined) and red (struck-through) are the additions and 

deletions made by the TGWG. 

2008 Proposed MICS TGWG Version 

§ 543.4 

RESERVED 

§ 543.4 What are the rules of interpretation 

and of general application for this part?  

RESERVED 

(a) Minimum Standards. A TGRA may 

establish and implement additional technical 

standards that are as stringent as, or more 

stringent than, those set out in this part.  

(b) Only Applicable Standards Apply. 

Gaming equipment and software used with 

Class II gaming systems shall meet all 

applicable requirements of this part. For 

example, if a gaming operation does not offer 

lines of credit, then any standards that govern 

credit do not apply.  

(c) No Limitation of Technology. This part 

should not be interpreted to limit the use of 

technology or to preclude the use of 

technology not specifically referenced.  

(d) Severability. If any provision of this part is 

declared invalid by a court of competent 

jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the 

remainder of this part.  

TGWG Guidance 

None
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          10,480
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,276
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,747
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,330
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,145
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,082
<SALES>                                        418,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               418,388
<CGS>                                          371,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  371,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,039
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,859
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,180
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,180
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        
<PAGE>

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Baldor Electric  Company and affiliates of our report dated February 3, 1998,
except for Note L, as to which the date is March 3, 1998,  included  in the 1997
Annual Report to Shareholders of Baldor Electric Company and affiliates.

Our audits also included the  financial  statement  schedule of Baldor  Electric
Company and affiliates listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility
of the Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits.  In our opinion,  the financial  statement  schedule  referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial  statements taken as a
whole,  presents  fairly in all  material  respects  the  information  set forth
therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, No. 2-77046) pertaining to the Baldor Electric Company 1982 Incentive
Stock Option Plan,  (Form S-8, No.  33-16766)  pertaining to the Baldor Electric
Company 1987 Incentive Stock Plan,  (Form S-8, No.  33-28239)  pertaining to the
Baldor  Electric  Company  Employee  Savings  Plan,  (Form  S-8,  No.  33-36421)
pertaining  to  the  Baldor   Electric   Company  1989  Stock  Option  Plan  for
Non-Employee Directors and (Forms S-8, No. 33-59281 and No. 33-60731) pertaining
to the Baldor  Electric  Company  1994  Incentive  Stock  Plan,  (Form S-8,  No.
333-33109)  pertaining to the Baldor Electric Company 1996 Stock Option Plan for
Non-Employee  Directors,  (Form S-8,  No.  333-33287)  pertaining  to the Baldor
Electric Company  Employees' Profit Sharing and Savings Plan of our report dated
February  3,  1998,  except for Note L, as to which the date is March 3, 1998, 
with  respect  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements
incorporated  herein by  reference,  and our report  included in the  proceeding
paragraph  with respect to the  financial  statement  schedule  included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Baldor Electric Company and affiliates.



/s/  Ernst & Young LLP
---------------------
Ernst & Young LLP
Little Rock, Arkansas
March 27, 1998



<PAGE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Rodriguez, Appellant.

Submitted October 29, 2012;

decided November 19, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Exhibit 32

 

ITRONICS INC.

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Itronics Inc. (the Company") on Form10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on January 6, 2006 (the "Report") each of the undersigned, in thecapacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: January 6, 2006                 /S/JOHN W. WHITNEY
                                      JohnW. Whitney

                                      President

Date: January 6, 2006                 /S/MICHAEL C. HORSLEY
                                      MichaelC. Horsley

                                      Controller

37
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3100 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 404
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3100

                          [Report No. 111-196]

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the Little Wood River Ranch.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2010

 Mr. Risch (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                              May 24, 2010

              Reported by Mr. Bingaman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the Little Wood River Ranch.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT INVOLVING LITTLE WOOD RIVER RANCH.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12063, the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the 
licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in accordance 
with the procedures of the Commission under that section--
            (1) extend the time period during which the licensee is 
        required to commence the construction of project works to the 
        end of the 3-year period beginning on the date of enactment of 
        this Act; or
            (2) if the license for Project No. 12063 has been 
        terminated, reinstate the license and extend the time period 
        during which the licensee is required to commence the 
        construction of project works to the end of the 3-year period 
        beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                                       Calendar No. 404

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3100

                          [Report No. 111-196]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the Little Wood River Ranch.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 24, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```