alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(g)

CERTIFICATIONS

 
I, E. Renae Conley, certify that:  
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Entergy Louisiana, LLC;  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:   
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   
b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;   
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

		/s/ E. Renae Conley
Exhibit 32.2  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/S/ Donna UrbainName:Donna UrbainTitle:Principal Financial Officer with respect to Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.Date:July 27, 2007
#### HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as Trustee for the Registered Holders of Renaissance Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-1, Respondent, v Robert T. Ashley et al., Appellants.

Submitted April 22, 2013;

decided June 6, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          31,923
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,232<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     56,216
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,099
<PP&E>                                          75,928<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,292
<BONDS>                                         19,080
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           214
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   203,802
<SALES>                                        257,436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               284,486
<CGS>                                          217,196
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  217,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 939
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,050
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,603
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,447
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,447
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.85
<FN>
<F1>Accounts Receivable and PP&E are Net
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.17 


 


Cost Assignment Agreement


 


THIS AGREEMENT is dated as of 30th day of June 2019 between


 


Global Engine Limited, (the “Party A”),
having its place of business at Room A, 8/F, Reason Group Tower, 403 Castle Peak Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories, Hong Kong;


 


and


 


Boxasone Limited, (the “Party B”),
having its place of business at Room A, 8/F, Reason Group Tower, 403 Castle Peak Road, Kwai Chung, New Territories, Hong Kong.


 


The parties agree as follows:


 


		1.	Party A shall share the portion of salaries expenses paid by Party B in relation to the general work allocation
of the staff, in accordance with the estimated workload of staff used by Party A, for staff as listed below, starting from 1 July 2019
until termination by either party with one month’s written notice



 


			Samantha Foong (shared equally by Party A and B)



 


		2.	Any amendments for the Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties hereto.



 


		3.	This Agreement shall be construed under and governed by the Laws of Hong Kong.



 


	Global Engine Limited	Boxasone Limited
	 	 
	By: 			By:		 
	Lee Yat Lung Andrew	Lee Yat Lung Andrew
	Director	Director
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ("Quarterly Report") ofItronics Inc. (the "Registrant") for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of theundersigned, in their capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

 

Date: November 14, 2008                     /S/JOHN W. WHITNEY
                                            JohnW. Whitney

                                            President

                                            (PrincipalExecutive and 

                                            FinancialOfficer)

53
96-1406 and 96-1407.

#### NFI Metro Ctr. II Assoc. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 95-J-80 and 95-J-79. Reported at 78 Ohio St.3d 105, 676 N.E.2d 881. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas, J., dissents.
EX-10.10



 Exhibit 10.10 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED GAS GATHERING AGREEMENT 

FOR 
 QUESTAR
EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION COMPANY 
 THIS AMENDMENT is entered into this 16 day of August, 2007, between Questar Exploration
and Production Company (Shipper) and Questar Gas Management Company (QGM). Shipper and QGM are collectively referred to as the Parties. 
 The Parties represent as follows: 
  

	A.	Shipper and QGM entered into an Amended and Restated Gas Gathering Agreement dated September 7, 2001 (“Agreement”). 


 

	B.	The Parties have determined that it is in their mutual interest to amend the Agreement. 

 Accordingly, the Parties agree that the date listed in the second sentence of Paragraph 4.1 of the Agreement shall be amended as follows: 

 

	 	1.	“April 1, 1998” is hereby deleted and replaced with “May 1, 2007.” 


 

	 	2.	Except as adjusted by this Amendment, or as may have been previously been amended, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. 


THIS AMENDMENT is entered into by the authorized representatives of the Parties whose signatures are set forth below. 

 

			
	Shipper
	QUESTAR EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ J.B. Neese

		 	J.B. Neese
		 	Executive Vice President
	
	QGM:
	QUESTAR GAS MANAGEMENT COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ P.H. Richards

		 	P.H. Richards
		 	Vice President
97-261.

#### Middendorf v. Middendorf.

Shelby App. No. 17-96-5.

F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  July 30, 2009 |   |   |   | /s/ Robert H. Joseph, Jr.      |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |   |   | Robert H. Joseph, Jr.          |
|                           |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer        |
|                           |   |   |   | AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. |

----
#### NYCTL 1998-1 Trust et al., Respondents, v Carajo Holding Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Williamsburg Christian Church, Intervenor-Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 437]

In an action to foreclose a tax lien, the defendant Carajo Holding Corporation appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated December 13, 2004, which denied its motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated December 2, 2002, entered upon its default in answering the complaint, to vacate and rescind the public auction sale, and to vacate and rescind the referee’s report of sale.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

In a prior action the Kings County District Attorney’s office obtained a criminal court order of attachment and temporary restraining order (hereinafter the TRO) on property owned by the defendant Carajo Holding Corporation (hereinafter Carajo Corp.). Ernest J. Varacalli is the principal of Carajo Corp. The TRO enjoined Varacalli and Carajo Corp., as well as numerous other named individuals and corporations, from transferring, wasting, encumbering, or dissipating the property. It did not enjoin any party in the present action other than Carajo Corp.

The plaintiffs subsequently purchased an unpaid tax lien on the subject property. They commenced this action against, among others, Carajo Corp., by service of a summons and complaint upon the Secretary of State pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 306. The plaintiffs obtained a judgment of foreclosure and sale against Carajo Corp. upon its default in answering the complaint. The property was subsequently sold at a public auction and later assigned to the Williamsburg Christian Church (hereinafter the intervenor).

Carajo Corp. moved to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale solely on the ground that the TRO barred the sale of the property. The Supreme Court denied the motion. We affirm.

Contrary to Carajo Corp.’s contention, the Supreme Court did not improperly act as an appellate court, and did not violate the TRO in the prior action by directing the sale of the property in *776question at the foreclosure sale. The TRO did not bar the sale or transfer of the property by anyone except the parties named in the prior action *(see Finance Inv. Co. [Bermuda] v Gossweiler,*145 AD2d 462 [1988]). Since there is not even an allegation that the plaintiffs, the City of New York, or the intervenor were named in, or served with, the TRO, it was inapplicable to them by its own terms.

Carajo Corp.’s remaining contentions are raised for the first time on appeal and are not properly before this Court *(see Beneficial N.Y. v McGovern,*207 AD2d 369, 370 [1994]; *cf. Jones v Flowers,*547 US —, —, 164 L Ed 2d 415, 425 [2006]). Florio, J.E, Krausman, Luciano and Skelos, JJ., concur.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3594

_____________________________

SHUKEL MUTCH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County.

Andrew J. Decker, Judge.

May 15, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 13A-14(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Peak Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified
(the "Report"), the undersigned, Wilfred Shorrocks, as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Wilfred Shorrocks
-----------------------------------
Wilfred Shorrocks
Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 18, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership VI-B for
the quarter ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                851,091
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                              7,078,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                      2,272,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      6,384,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       0
<BONDS>                                             5,238,743
<COMMON>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        6,384,437
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      482,327
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         542,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    115,233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (59,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (59,534)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             991
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    11233
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 13411
<PP&E>                                        29213022
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                29246348
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3466682
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    25779666
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  29246348
<SALES>                                         301557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                360068
<CGS>                                            96237
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    27653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                139904
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  96274
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              96274
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     96274
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.28
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Swift Energy Income Partners 1987-B, Ltd., was in the process of liquidation as
of March 31, 2000 and as such is governed by liquidation basis accounting.  This
schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income Partners 1987-B, Ltd's statement of net assets in process of liquidation
and statement of operations contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statement.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         4,500
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  260,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               295,321
<PP&E>                                         3,184,132
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,480,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          32,709
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        154,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,224
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  86,681<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,223,734
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,223,734
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,223,734
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
JAVONNE TERRELL MURPHY

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2237

_ ____________________________/

Opinion filed November 7, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. John T. Brown , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for A ppellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., JAY and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.