alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ON
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
of Michael Baker Corporation:

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report
dated March 10, 2004 appearing in the 2003 Annual Report to Shareholders of
Michael Baker Corporation (which report and consolidated financial statements
are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) also included
an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this
Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in
all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
--------------------------------------
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 10, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5                  
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<S>                             <C>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1997               JAN-07-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-01-1997               SEP-01-1997
<CASH>                          62862                     62862
<SECURITIES>                    0                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                   3340                      3340
<ALLOWANCES>                    0                         0
<INVENTORY>                     12405                     12405
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                79399                     79399
<PP&E>                          257576                    257576
<DEPRECIATION>                  90891                     90891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  246285                    246285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           17954                     17954
<BONDS>                         31                        31
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0                         0
<PREFERRED>                     0                         0
<COMMON>                        3                         3
<OTHER-SE>                      183194                    183194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    246285                    246285
<SALES>                         17587                     51124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                17587                     51124
<CGS>                           21661                     63198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   21661                     63198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                624                       3245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              204                       646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (4902)                    (15965)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (4902)                    (15965)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0                         0
<CHANGES>                       0                         0
<NET-INCOME>                    (4902)                    (15965)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.18)                    (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.18)                    (0.60) 
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2
 

     REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

To the Board of Directors
of Michael Baker Corporation

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report
dated February 6, 1997, appearing within Exhibit 13.1 which has been
incorporated by reference into various items of Michael Baker Corporation's
Annual Report on Form 10-K, also included an audit of the Financial Statement
Schedule listed in Item 14(a) of the Form 10-K.  In our opinion, this 
Financial Statement Schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements.


/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
-------------------------
Price Waterhouse LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
February 6, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14175]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Form F-80; OMB Control No. 3235-0404; SEC File No. 270-357.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of 
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this 
existing collection of information to the Office of Management Budget 
for extension and approval.
    Form F-80 (17 CFR 239.41) is used by large, publicly-traded 
Canadian foreign private issuers registering securities that are 
offered in business combinations and exchange offers. The information 
collected is intended to ensure that the information required to be 
filed by the Commission permits verification of compliance with 
securities law requirements and assures the public availability of the 
information. Form F-80 takes approximately 2 hours per response and is 
filed by 4 issuers for a total annual burden of 8 hours. The estimated 
burden of 2 hours per response was based upon the amount of time 
necessary to compile the registration statement using the existing 
Canadian prospectus plus any additional information required by the 
Commission.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; 
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collections of information 
on respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will 
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Charles Boucher/CIO, 
Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 General 
Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312; or send an e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#df8f8d9e8092beb6b3bdb0a79facbabcf1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85d5d7c4dac8e4ece9e7eafdc5f6e0e6abe2eaf3">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 10, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-14175 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
97-630.

#### State ex rel. Serv. Emp. Internatl. Union, Dist. 925 v. State Emp. Relations Bd.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent and on motion for judgment on the pleadings. *Sua sponte,*alternative writ granted.

*Sua sponte,*this cause is to be set for oral argument.

Cook, J., would defer ruling on oral argument until after briefing.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apogent Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DENNIS
BROWNDennis Brown Chief Financial Officer February 13, 2004




This certification accompanies
this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Frawley, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 920]

by the *815appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 1, 1987 *(People v Frawley,*131 AD2d 504 [1987]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 1, 1982.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Florio, Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          987876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    43462
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     570001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1628439
<PP&E>                                          403932
<DEPRECIATION>                                  281243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1757228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           166187
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2485
<OTHER-SE>                                     1580133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1757228
<SALES>                                        1007979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1020968
<CGS>                                           734003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   274369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  12596
<INCOME-TAX>                                      8580
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4016
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                         <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<CASH>                            4,199
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                    71,929
<ALLOWANCES>                      1,151
<INVENTORY>                     117,071
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                198,431
<PP&E>                           84,287
<DEPRECIATION>                   26,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  300,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           160,196
<BONDS>                          94,129
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                       3,878
<COMMON>                          2,444
<OTHER-SE>                       33,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    300,990
<SALES>                         113,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                113,385
<CGS>                           101,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   101,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     59
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                6,121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (2,929)
<INCOME-TAX>                     (1,142)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,787)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,787)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (1.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (1.34)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                             COLUMBUS ENERGY CORP.
                 Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings
                                  (Unaudited)
                      (In Thousands Except Per Share Data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Nine Months           Three Months    
                                 Ended August 31,      Ended August 31,  
                                 ----------------      ----------------  
                                 1996        1995      1996        1995
                                 ----        ----      ----        ----
<S>                              <C>         <C>       <C>         <C>
Primary:                                           
                                                   
 Based on weighted average                         
 shares outstanding including                      
 the effect of common stock                        
 equivalents:                                      
                                                   
 Weighted average shares                           
  outstanding:                    3,049     3,160       3,049     3,117  
                                                                         
Incremental shares attributable                                          
 to dilutive stock options and                                           
 warrants outstanding based on                                           
 average market price during                                             
 the period calculated using                                             
 the treasury stock method           34        18          82        22  
                                 ------    ------      ------    ------  
                                                                         
   Total average common and                                              
    common equivalent shares      3,083     3,178       3,131     3,139  
                                 ======    ======      ======    ======  
                                                                         
     Net earnings                $1,539    $  501      $  456    $   50  
                                 ======    ======      ======    ======  
                                                                         
Earnings per share               $  .50    $  .16      $  .15    $  .02  
                                 ======    ======      ======    ======  
</TABLE>                                               


Note:  Fully diluted incremental shares for the nine months were 51,000 and
       18,000 with total average common and common share equivalent shares
       3,100,000 and 3,178,000 in 1996 and 1995, respectively.

       Fully diluted incremental shares for the three months were 126,000 and
       22,000 with total average common and common share equivalent shares
       3,175,000 and 3,139,000 in 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Accountants






We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (333-53087) and in
the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-35529, No. 333-35531, No.
333-27081, No. 333-16833, No. 33-50371, No. 33-21717 and No. 33-40438) of Arvin
Industries, Inc. of our report dated January 29, 1999, except as to Note 15
which is as of February 26, 1999 appearing on Page 38 of this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
March 1, 1999

                                       78
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:



(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;



(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.



|       |                                                                   
|------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation                         
|       | General Partner                                                   
|       |                                                                   
|By:    | /S/ Kelly Tucek                                                   
|       |                                                                   
|Name:  | Kelly Tucek                                                       
|Title: | Vice President of the General Partner and                         
|       | principal financial officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.
|Date:  | July 24, 2006
EX-10.11



 Exhibit 10.11 
 TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FOR THOSE TERMS HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THE REDACTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, AND
THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH TWO ASTERISKS (**). 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 

GAS GATHERING AGREEMENT 
 FOR 
 EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION COMPANY 

THIS AMENDMENT is entered into this 22 day of March, 2010, and made effective the first day of June, 2010 between Questar
Exploration and Production Company (Shipper) and Questar Gas Management, 1050 17th St. Suite 500, Denver, CO 80265 (QGM). Shipper and QGM are collectively referred to as the Parties. 
 The Parties represent as follows: 
  

	 	A.	Shipper and Gatherer entered into a Gas Gathering Agreement dated September 7, 2001. 


 

	 	B.	The Parties have determined that it is in their mutual interest to amend the Gas Gathering Agreement, dated September 7, 2001. 


The Parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Effective June 1, 2010, Section 4.1 of the contract shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


Shipper shall pay a base gathering rate of $** per MMBtu received by QGM, for gathering services downstream of a point
located in ** (commonly referred to as **) to the Delivery Point(s) as identified in Exhibit B, as revised. Beginning June 1, 2011, this rate shall be adjusted annually in proportion to the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index –
All Urban Customers, U.S. All Items, (most current) as published by the Department of Labor for the preceding calendar year. In no event shall the adjusted rate be less than the base rate. 

 

	 	2.	Effective June 1, 2010, Section 4.3 of the Contract shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


Commencing January 1, 2020, renegotiation of the rates may be initiated by either party given 90 days written notice.
In the event that the parties cannot reach agreement concerning gathering rates, then the rates and rate structure in effect shall prevail. 
  

	 	3.	Except as amended by this Amendment, or as may have previously been amended, the Agreement of September 7, 2001, remains in full force and effect.










 TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FOR THOSE TERMS HAS BEEN
REQUESTED. THE REDACTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH TWO ASTERISKS (**). 
  

 THIS AMENDMENT is entered into by the authorized representatives of the Parties whose signatures are
set forth below. 
  

			
	Shipper
	QUESTAR EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ J.B. Neese

	J.B. Neese
	Executive Vice President
	
	QGM:
	QUESTAR GAS MANAGEMENT COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ P.H. Richards

	P.H. Richards
	Vice President
96-2883.

#### State ex rel. Harrison v. Wilkinson.

In Habeas Corpus. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DAVID HATCHIGIAN,

Petitioner

v.

STEIN & TROIANI, A PROFESSIONAL 

CORPORATION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 659 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### In the Matter of Dornell Corley, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 817]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Egan, Jr., J.), entered April 12, 2006 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR *1143article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

In 1995, petitioner was convicted of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and was sentenced to eight years to life in prison. He was on parole at the time he committed this crime, having been previously convicted of two drug-related felonies. Following his third appearance before the Board of Parole in November 2004, petitioner’s request for parole release was denied and he was ordered held for an additional 24 months. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

We affirm. Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the Board considered the appropriate statutory factors set forth in Executive Law § 259-i in denying his request for parole release and did not rely exclusively upon petitioner’s criminal history or the crime of which he was convicted. In addition to petitioner’s crime and criminal history, the Board took into account petitioner’s receipt of a certificate of earned eligibility, his relatively clean disciplinary record and his postrelease plans *(see Matter of Thompson v New York State Div. of Parole,*30 AD3d 746 [2006]; *Matter of Pearl v New York State Div. of Parole,*25 AD3d 1058 [2006]). The Board was not required to accord each factor that it considered equal weight *(see Matter of Wood v Dennison,*25 AD3d 1056, 1057 [2006]). While petitioner received a certificate of earned eligibility, this did not entitle him to discretionary parole release *(see Matter of Pearl v New York State Div. of Parole, supra*at 1058). Inasmuch as we do not find that the Board’s decision exhibits “ ‘irrationality bordering on impropriety’ ” *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000], quoting *Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]), we find no reason to disturb it.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.