alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28574-28575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (09-049)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to 
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for 
licensing.

DATES: June 16, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James J. McGroary, Patent Counsel, 
Marshall Space Flight Center, Mail Code

[[Page 28575]]

LS01, Huntsville, AL 35812; telephone (256) 544-0013; fax (256) 544-
0258.
    NASA Case No. MFS-32342-1-CIP: Nuclear Fuel Element Using 
Curvilinearly Grooved Fuel Rings;
    NASA Case No. MFS-32733-1: Unbalanced-Flow, Fluid-Mixing Plug with 
Metering Capabilities;
    NASA Case No. MFS-32748-1: Flow Plug with Length-to-Hole Size 
Uniformity for Use in Flow Conditioning and Flow Metering;
    NASA Case No. MFS-32651-1: Orientation Control Method and System 
for Object in Motion.

    Dated: June 10, 2009.
Richard W. Sherman,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-14059 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

**(PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

 

(Subsections (a) and (b)of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, UnitedStates Code), each of the undersigned officers of Apogee Technology, Inc., aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, that:

 

The quarterly report on Form 10QSB for the quarterended June 30, 2003 (the “Form 10QSB”) of the Company fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and the information contained in the Form 10QSB fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Dated:   August 14, 2003 | /s/                                                                        | Herbert M. Stein |   |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|--------|
|                          | Herbert M. Stein                                                           |
|                          | Chairman of the Board, President  and Chief Executive Officer              |
|                          |                                                                       |
|                          |                                                                       |
| Dated:   August 14, 2003 | /s/                                                                        | David Spiegel    |   |
|                          | David Spiegel                                                              |
|                          | Treasurer (principal  financial officer  and principal accounting officer) |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,966
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,505
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,471)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The  undersigned  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-F  ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 13th day of August, 2003.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-F
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-F and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-F and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
97-477.

#### State ex rel. Kline v. Crow.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss of Jack Dennin, motion to dismiss of Frederick W. Crow III, and motion to strike motion to dismiss of Frederick Crow. Motions to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents, would grant the writ of mandamus, and would order the return of the tapes.
#### In the Matter of Cheyenne J., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Christian J., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Submitted July 15, 2013;

decided September 10, 2013

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument or leave to appeal, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
#### Jennifer Cangro, Appellant, v Gina Marie Reitano, Respondent.

Submitted October 29, 2012;

decided December 13, 2012

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3481 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify 

Federal responsibility for stormwater pollution. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3481 ES

1 SECTION 1. FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITY TO PAY FOR 

2 STORMWATER PROGRAMS. 

3 Section 313 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

4 Act (33 U.S.C. 1323) is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘(c) REASONABLE SERVICE CHARGES.— 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For the purposes of this 

8 Act, reasonable service charges described in sub9 section (a) include any reasonable nondiscriminatory 

10 fee, charge, or assessment that is— 

11 ‘‘(A) based on some fair approximation of 

12 the proportionate contribution of the property 

13 or facility to stormwater pollution (in terms of 

14 quantities of pollutants, or volume or rate of 

15 stormwater discharge or runoff from the prop16 erty or facility); and 

17 ‘‘(B) used to pay or reimburse the costs 

18 associated with any stormwater management 

19 program (whether associated with a separate 

20 storm sewer system or a sewer system that 

21 manages a combination of stormwater and sani22 tary waste), including the full range of pro23 grammatic and structural costs attributable to 

24 collecting stormwater, reducing pollutants in 

25 stormwater, and reducing the volume and rate 

26 of stormwater discharge, regardless of whether 
3 

†S 3481 ES

1 that reasonable fee, charge, or assessment is de2 nominated a tax. 

3 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON ACCOUNTS.— 

4 ‘‘(A) LIMITATION.—The payment or reim5 bursement of any fee, charge, or assessment de6 scribed in paragraph (1) shall not be made 

7 using funds from any permanent authorization 

8 account in the Treasury. 

9 ‘‘(B) REIMBURSEMENT OR PAYMENT OBLI10 GATION OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.—Each de11 partment, agency, or instrumentality of the ex12 ecutive, legislative, and judicial branches of the 

13 Federal Government, as described in subsection 

14 (a), shall not be obligated to pay or reimburse 

15 any fee, charge, or assessment described in 

16 paragraph (1), except to the extent and in an 

17 amount provided in advance by any appropria18 tions Act to pay or reimburse the fee, charge, 

19 or assessment.’’. 

Passed the Senate December 21, 2010. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3481 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 

pollution. to clarify Federal responsibility for stormwater
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3346 

To increase the limits on liability under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands 

Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2010 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself and Mr. MENENDEZ) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To increase the limits on liability under the Outer 

Continental Shelf Lands Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Outer Continental 

5 Shelf Lands Act Amendments Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REMEDIES AND PENALTIES UNDER THE OUTER 

7 CONTINENTAL SHELF LANDS ACT. 

8 (a) CIVIL PENALTIES.—Section 24(b) of the Outer 

9 Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1350(b)) is 

10 amended— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3346 IS

1 (1) in the first sentence of paragraph (1), by 

2 striking ‘‘$20,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000’’; and 

3 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘may be as4 sessed’’ and inserting ‘‘of not more than $150,000 

5 for each day of the continuance of the failure shall 

6 be assessed’’; and 

7 (b) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.—The first sentence of 

8 section 24(c) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

9 (43 U.S.C. 1350(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘$100,000’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 subsection (a) take effect on April 15, 2010. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### Beede *v.*Cheeney and others.

*(Circuit Court, D. Minnesota.*

December, 1880.)

1. Removal—Bond Approved by State Court.

In a case of removal the jurisdiction of the federal court does not depend upon the form or substance of the bond approved by the state court.

*2.*Same—When Requisite Citizenship Must Exist.

A cause cannot be removed under the act of 1795, unless the required citizenship existed, not only when the petition for removal was filed, but also at the time when the action was begun in the state court.

8. Same—Same.

A petition for removal stated that the defendants *are*residents of another state. *Meld,*that the cause must be remanded, upon the ground that the petition was in the present tense.—[Ed.

Motion to Bemand.

*M. 0. Little,*for plaintiff.

*A. Oppenheim*and *W. P. Warner,*for defendant.

McCrary, C. J.

In this case there is a motion to remand on the ground that the bond accepted by the state court to secura the filing of the transcript in this court, and the payment of *389any costs that might arise because of the wrongful removal, is not such a bond as the statute requires. We are of opinion that the jurisdiction of this court in a case removed from a state court does not depend upon the form, nor even upon the substance, of the bond which is presented to and approved by the state court before removal. If the statute in other respects is complied with, and a copy of the record is filed here in accordance with the statute, the removal is complete. But, upon looking into this record, we observe what counsel seem to have overlooked—the petition for the removal of the cause into this court is in the present tense. It states that the defendants *are*residents of another state. Under the judiciary act of 1789 the supreme court has held that the record must show the citizenship of the parties at the time of the commencement of the action. In a case recently decided in St. Louis, where Justice Miller was present in court, it was held that the same rule prevails under the act of 1875, and that the petition for removal under that act must also show the citizenship of the parties at the time of the commencement of the action, and not at the time of the application for removal. On that ground, therefore, this case must be remanded. Although the motion does not present that question, the court is bound as to that jurisdictional matter, and to take notice of it without any formal motion.

Note. See *Curtin*v. *Decker, supra.*
# RADx
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6519

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JEROME RICO EVANS, a/k/a Wank,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (7:10-cr-00013-F-1; 7:12-cv-00029-F)

Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 23, 2013

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Rico Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Rico Evans seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2013) motion and his self-styled motion filed pursuant to Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 59(e) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 36, and has filed a motion 

for a certificate of appealability. The district court’s orders

are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Evans has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 
3

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Eon.D.LeonEarp

Securities

Commissioner Secretary

of State'sOffice Austin,

Texas

Dear Sir: opinion No. O-1629

Re: Travhling

expenses

of Securities Commissioner

to attend conference of State's Securities Commissioners in Chicago,

February19th and 2Oth, 1940.

We have your requestfor an opinionon the above subject, dated Februsry 14th and also e copy of tour report to the Secretary of State, dated February 23rd,whereinyou summarize your conclusions

relatingto various types of securities which may ba offeredfor registration in Texas which conclusions

and recomdetions arrivedat after ccnference with other conferees,

ale to be used in determiningthe future policies

of your department,You have advisedthe writer that this conference was arranged by mutmr'lagreement among the five personaattending same, being yourself, the Securities

Conmissioners

of the respective

states of Minnesota, Illinois and Florida,

and the field secretary of the American Investment Bankers Association.

It is our opinionthat khe object of this conference is clearly

a State &pose. Nor do we believe that the conference constitutes

a "convention"

as that word is used in the general rider to Senate Bill 427 of the 46th Lagisla ture.

Yours very truly

APPROVED

MAR. 12, 1940 ATTORNEYCERERALOFTEXAS s/GERALD

c. MAN-N A!lTORNEY

cZ3NEW.L

OF TEXAS a/ Walter R. Koch THIS OPINION

CONSIDERED ANDAPPROVED IN LIMITFLD CONFERENCE bs Walter Pi. Koch Assistant

WFX: aw
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         117,408
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,955,692<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    127,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,284,888
<PP&E>                                         923,745<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,411,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,693,158
<BONDS>                                      6,276,273<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          401,671<F4>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       420,770
<OTHER-SE>                                     206,754
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,411,875
<SALES>                                      3,249,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        1,300,101
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,014,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             307,326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (52,335)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (59,835)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowances
<F2>Net of depreciation
<F3>Long-term debt
<F4>Redeemable warrants
</FN>
        




</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Ernst & Young, Independent Auditors

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 

Form S-8 No. 33-38302 

Form S-8 No. 333-49779, 

Form S-8 No. 333-62037,

Form S-8 No. 333-97703,

Form S-8 No. 333-82828,

Form S-8 No. 333-16821,

Form S-8 No. 333-70387,

Form S-8 No. 333-70673, and

Form S-8 No. 333-54158

of our report dated March 28, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Fairchild Corporation and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2003.

 

 

         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

McLean, VA

September 22, 2003
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-C  ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 13th day of August, 2004.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-C
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-C and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-C and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.