alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 9, 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EXXON MOBIL CORPORAT ION , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00456

- CV V.

DELIA PAGAYON, MICHE LLE FULTON, ALFREDO G. PAGAYON, MICHAEL G. PAGAYON, AND THE ESTATE OF AL FREDO M. PAGAYON

, Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed February 26 , 2013 in favor of appellee s Delia Pagayon, Michelle Fulton, Alfredo G. Paga yon, Michael G. Pagayon, and t he Estate of Alfredo M. Pagayon, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for

pr oceedin gs in accordance with the court’ s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee s Delia Pagayon, Michelle Fulton, Alfredo G. Pa gayon, Michael G. Pagayon, and t he Estate of Alfredo M. Pagayon.

We furt her order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We have issued our reports dated March 10, 2005 with respect to the consolidated
statement of financial condition of BKF Capital Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries and
the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders'
equity and cash flows, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 which are
incorporated by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.
333-50132 and 333-75014).  We consent to the incorporation by reference in these
Registration Statements of the aforementioned reports.




\s\GRANT THORNTON LLP

New York, New York
March 10, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6286

FREDERICK SMITH, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-99-511-2) Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 6, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey,III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked “filed” on February 3, 2000, the district court’s records show it was entered on the docket sheet on February 4, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Frederick Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. Angelone , No. CA-99-511-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 4, 2000). * We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.3




 


BONUS DESCRIPTION


PRESIDENT OF WATERSTONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION


APRIL 26, 2012


 


	Bonus:	5%
of all Waterstone Mortgage pre-tax income in excess of $2,000,000.00,

                                                                                           adjusted as set forth below

                                                                                 

			
	Adjustments:	a.	WSB warehouse line to be priced equivalent to USB warehouse line (or best lender pricing by third party to Waterstone Mortgage)
	 	 	 
		b.	$100,000 in annual parent company pass-through expenses
	 	 	 
		c.	Expensing of Waterstone Mortgage officer bonuses prior to computation of Egenhoefer bonus
	 	 	 
		d.	No bonus payable if Waterstone Mortgage or WaterStone Bank become subject to a regulatory order the caused or contributed to by the operations of Waterstone Mortgage.
#### WALLACE v. UNITED STATES.

No. 1320 A.

District Court, W. D. New York.

Sept. 22, 1941.

William B. Mahoney, of Buffalo, N. Y., for plaintiff.

George L. Grobe, U. S. Atty., and Robert M. Hitchcock, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Buffalo, N. Y., for defendant.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This suit has been pending since January 23, 1934. It was noticed for trial for the November, 1937, term of court. Upon the plaintiff’s failure to move it for trial, the case was dismissed. The order of dismissal was entered and a copy thereof served on the attorney for the plaintiff on May 13, 1938. Nothing further was done until November 12, 1940, when the plaintiff moved to vacate the order of dismissal. Pending consultations between the attorneys for the parties, action on the motion to vacate was held until February 14, 1941, when the motion was granted.

The defendant now moves, under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to set aside the vacating order on the ground of the alleged “inadvertence” of the United States Attorney to call attention to such rule on the motion to vacate. At the time of the granting of the motion it was agreed between the respective attorneys that to expedite the trial a stipulation of facts would be promptly prepared. This was done, and the stipulation signed by both attorneys. No further order or other proceedings were taken with respect to the last-mentioned motion until the instant motion was made.

The motion to vacate was granted for reasons which the Court deemed sufficient.

Rule 60(b) provides that it shall be made “within a reasonable time” but in no case exceeding six months after such judgment, order or proceeding was taken. This motion was not within a reasonable time. The section finds its origin in section 473 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Moore’s Federal Practice, Vol. 3, p. 3280. Under the California Code it has been held that the granting of an order under such section is discretionary. Moore’s Federal Practice, Vol. 3, pp. 3281 and 3282, and citations. The rule itself provides that the court may “relieve a party.” In the exercise of the Court’s discretion in the instant case, the motion should be denied for the reasons hereinbefore assigned.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3481 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3481

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify Federal 
                responsibility for stormwater pollution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITY TO PAY FOR STORMWATER PROGRAMS.
    Section 313 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
1323) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Reasonable Service Charges.--
        ``(1) In general.--For the purposes of this Act, reasonable 
    service charges described in subsection (a) include any reasonable 
    nondiscriminatory fee, charge, or assessment that is--
            ``(A) based on some fair approximation of the proportionate 
        contribution of the property or facility to stormwater 
        pollution (in terms of quantities of pollutants, or volume or 
        rate of stormwater discharge or runoff from the property or 
        facility); and
            ``(B) used to pay or reimburse the costs associated with 
        any stormwater management program (whether associated with a 
        separate storm sewer system or a sewer system that manages a 
        combination of stormwater and sanitary waste), including the 
        full range of programmatic and structural costs attributable to 
        collecting stormwater, reducing pollutants in stormwater, and 
        reducing the volume and rate of stormwater discharge, 
        regardless of whether that reasonable fee, charge, or 
        assessment is denominated a tax.
        ``(2) Limitation on accounts.--
            ``(A) Limitation.--The payment or reimbursement of any fee, 
        charge, or assessment described in paragraph (1) shall not be 
        made using funds from any permanent authorization account in 
        the Treasury.
            ``(B) Reimbursement or payment obligation of federal 
        government.--Each department, agency, or instrumentality of the 
        executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the Federal 
        Government, as described in subsection (a), shall not be 
        obligated to pay or reimburse any fee, charge, or assessment 
        described in paragraph (1), except to the extent and in an 
        amount provided in advance by any appropriations Act to pay or 
        reimburse the fee, charge, or assessment.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	$289,997.72	May 31, 2013


 


FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
IDS Solar Technologies,
Inc., a Nevada Corporation,
("Maker") hereby promises to pay to the order of
Bruce R. Knoblich ("Holder") the sum of TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY
NINE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINETY-SEVEN DOLLARS ($289,997.72). This note shall
bear interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum.
All principal and interest due hereunder shall be paid
on or before November 30,
2013.


 


This note supersedes the Note dated
February 27, 2013 for $183,497.72
between IDS Solar Technologies, Inc.
and Bruce R. Knoblich and incorporates the
principal balance into this promissory note.


 


Maker hereby waives presentment, dishonor,
notice of dishonor and
protest. All parties hereto consent
to, and Holder is expressly
authorized to make, without notice,
any and all renewals, extensions, modifications,
or waivers of the time for or the terms
of payment of any sum or sums due
hereunder, or under any documents or instruments
relating to or thereof or the taking
or release of collateral securing this Note. Any
such action by Holder shall
not discharge the liability of any party to this Note.


 


This Note shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State
of Nevada without regard
to conflict of law principles. Maker shall also pay
Holder any and all costs of collection incurred
in connection with this Note, including court costs and
reasonable attorney's fees.


 


IDS Solar Technologies, Inc.


 


 


/s/ Bruce R.
Knoblich


Bruce R.
Knoblich
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the following: (i) reference of our firm under the caption
"Portfolio Performance Information" in Item 1-Business, included in BKF Capital
Group Inc.'s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001; and
(ii) incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos.
333-50132 and 333-75014) pertaining to the 1998 Incentive Compensation Plan of
BKF Capital Group, Inc. of our report dated February 15, 2002, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of BKF Capital Group, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Ernst & Young LLP
New York, New York
April 1, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of 110 Media Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on May ___, 2005 (the "Report"), I,
Raymond Barton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Raymond Barton
------------------------------------
Raymond Barton
Chief Executive Officer
May 23, 2005

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
oe 'No,

2 yy
a 2
Y, AS)

3
GE comm?
TO: Michael Mukasay
Attorney General
United States Department of Justice

Jim Nussle
Director
Office of Management and Budget

Melanie Ann Pustay

Director
Office of Information and Privacy \

FROM: Cynthia K. Shaw pdr
Chief FOIA Officer
National Indian Gaming Commission
DATE: October 20, 2008

SUBJECT: _ Certification of Agency Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) Reading
Room.

The National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) conducted a review of the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) Reading Room for compliance with FOIA’s Reading Room
Requirements under EO 13,392.

A. Internal Review of Agency FOIA Reading Room

After a preliminary review of the NIGC’s Reading Room, no deficiencies were located.
Our website is monitored on a bi-weekly basis for maintenance and updated as warranted.

B. Any Reading Room Deficiencies Addressed
No deficiencies were located.
C. Certification

I, Cynthia K. Shaw, certify that the NIGC’s Reading Room is in compliance with the
requirement of the FOIA.

NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1441 L St. NW, Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 WWW.NIGC.GoVv

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                  
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                          96461
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   3220
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     10496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                110875
<PP&E>                          223338
<DEPRECIATION>                  85341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  248872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           12186
<BONDS>                         31
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        3
<OTHER-SE>                      190931
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    248872
<SALES>                         14862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                14862
<CGS>                           19811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   19811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2809
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (7979)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (7979)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (7979)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.31)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 13A-14(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Peak  Entertainment  Holdings,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date therein specified
(the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Wilfred Shorrocks, as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Wilfred Shorrocks
---------------------
Wilfred Shorrocks
Chief Executive Officer
Date: June 7, 2004

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IPVA-OLD Consent ltr 071813




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the references to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 25, 2013 with respect to the financial statements of Principal Life Insurance Company Separate Account B, (2) dated March 20, 2013 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Principal Life Insurance Company, and (3) dated 
 
March 20, 2013 with respect to the financial statement schedules of Principal Life Insurance Company, in Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4, 
 
No. 333-116220) of Principal Life Insurance Company Separate Account B and the related prospectus of the Principal Investment Plus Variable AnnuitySM Contract.
/s/Ernst & Young LLP
Des Moines, Iowa
July 18, 2013


    

	
		
	 

	1204-1349964-e-H
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            MPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT OT SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc., a New
Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Q/A for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Martin S. Smiley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350), that to his knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Martin S. Smiley
--------------------
Martin S. Smiley
Chief Financial Officer


January 26, 2004
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhaseTechnologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Qas amended by Amendment no.1 on Form 10Q/A for thequarter ended December 31, 2008  asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Durando, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), that to hisknowledge: 

1. 

The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

2. 

The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Ronald A.Durando                        Ronald A. Durando Chief Executive Officer 

March 13, 2009 

 

----
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

> 
(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation      General Partner

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral                                       

Name: Brenda G. GujralTitle: President of the General Partner and          principal executive officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P

Date: November 12, 2003
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 3

- 11 29

_____________________________
A LAN E. D AVIDSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County

. Melissa Olin , Judge

. April 16, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , W INOKUR , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Tyler K. Payne, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney Gene ral, Tallahassee, for Appellee.