alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [AA-12219; AK-962-1410-HY-P]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

# SUMMARY:

As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an appealable decision approving the conveyance of surface and subsurface estates for certain lands pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to The Aleut Corporation for 64.11 acres on Umnak Island, Alaska. Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the Anchorage Daily News.

# DATES:

The time limits for filing an appeal are:

1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected by the decision shall have until July 20, 2009 to file an appeal.

2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.

Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office,  222 West Seventh Avenue, #13,  Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Bureau of Land Management by phone at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at                         *ak.blm.conveyance@ak.blm.gov.*                         Persons who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.                    

Dina L. Torres,

Land Transfer Resolution Specialist, Resolution Branch.

[FR Doc. E9-14397 Filed 6-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
ORDER OF TEMPORARY CLOSURE 

To: Mr. Jerry Haney 

Principle Chief 

Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 

Post Office Box 1498 

Wewoka, Oklahoma 74884 

Ref. No. CO-98-01 

January 13, 1998 

1. Under the authority of 25 U.S.C. S2701 & m. and 25 

C. F. R. S573.6 (a) and (b) , the Chairman of the National Indian 

Gaming Commission (NIGC) hereby gives notice that the Seminole 

Nation of Oklahoma is ordered to cease and desist the operation 

of all "Reels of Skill" video gaming machines located in its 

gaming facilities within 24 hours of the NIGC affirming Notice of 

Violation 98-01 by issuing a notice and order to the Respondent, 

pursuant to $3577.15 of NIGC regulations. This action is 

necessary due to violations of 25 C.F.R. 5573.6 (a) (11) of NIGC 

regulations as described in that Notice of Violation. 

2. The Chairman of the Commission may rescind this Order 

for good cause shown. 

3. Under 25 C.F.R. §573.6(c), within seven (7) days after 

service of this Order, the Respondent may request, orally or in 

writing, informal expedited review by the Chairman. The Chairman 

must complete such review within two (2) days after receipt of a 

timely request. Within two (2) days after the expedited review 

provided by 25 C. F.R. S573.6 (c) , the Chairman must decide whether 

to continue the Order and must provide the Respondent with an 

explanation of the basis for the decision. 

4. Whether or not a Respondent seeks the informal expedited 

review described in paragraph 3 above, within 30 (thirty) days 

after service of this Order, the Respondent may appeal to the 

full Commission under 25 C.F.R. Part 577 by submitting a notice 

of appeal to the Nacional Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L 

'lyWWuilsr Street, NW, suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005. The Respondent has 
w a right to assistance of counsel in such an appeal. A notice of 

appeal must reference this Order. 

5. Within ten (10) days after filing a notice of appeal, 

the Respondent must file with the Commission a supplemental 

statement that states with particularity the relief desired and 

the grounds therefore and that includes, when available, 

supporting evidence in the form of affidavits. If the Respondent 

wishes to present oral testimony or witnesses at the hearing, the 

Respondent must include a request to do so with the supplemental 

statement. The request to present oral testimony or witnesses 

must specify the names of proposed witnesses and the general 

nature of their expected testimony, whether a closed hearing is 

requested and why. The Respondent may waive its right to an oral 

hearing and instead elect to have the matter determined by the 

Commission solely on the basis of written submissions. 

Dated this !3-%day of January, 1998. 

Chairman 

National Indian Gaming Commission
EXHIBIT 10(iii).7



BALDOR ELECTRIC COMPANY

BONUS PLAN FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS



PLAN ADMINISTRATION



The Board of Directors of the
Company (the Administrator) has sole responsibility for installation, review, and revision of the Plan and all its provisions, at their discretion, including year-to-year implementation of the plan.



PLAN PARTICIPANTS



Participants include the Executive Officers of the Company as designated by the
Board of Directors. Participation in the Plan does not constitute a guarantee of employment and incentive awards for plan participants whose employment is terminated for any reason may forfeit their rights to the Bonus. Participants who
retire or go on disability during the plan year will receive a prorated portion of their bonus earned.



BONUS PAYMENT DATE



The bonus
will be paid in a lump sum as soon as practical after the Companys financial results for the applicable year have been certified by the outside auditors.



BONUS FORMULA FOR THE YEAR



The formula used in the Plan is based on the Companys Sales and Profit Plan (Company Plan) for each year the Plan is implemented. The formula is
constructed so a bonus (using the percentage as defined below) of total compensation, base and contingent combined, will be paid on a segment when that segments goal of the approved Company Plan is met. The formula will have two independent
segments as specified below.



|              |  |                                      |  |              |     |   |         |   |     |  
|------------- |  | ------------------------------------ |  | ------------ | --- | - | ------- | - | --- | -
|BONUS FORMULA |  |                                      |  | Company Plan |     |   | Stretch |  
|Segment 1     |  | Sales                                |  | $            | tbd |   |         | $ | tbd |  
|              |  | Bonus based on sales goals           |  |              | 2.5 | % |         |   | 5.0 | %
|Segment 2     |  | Pre-tax earnings                     |  | $            | tbd |   |         | $ | tbd |  
|              |  | Bonus based on financial performance |  |              | 2.5 | % |         |   | 5.0 | %
|              |  | EPS                                  |  | $            | tbd |   |         | $ | tbd |  



Segment 1  Sales Goals



The sales component will provide 50% of the Bonus Formula. The maximum
bonus to be paid for this component is 5%. For sales below Company Plan, 0% bonus is earned. For sales at or above Company Plan, the bonus will be paid on a straight line pro-rata basis up to the percentages indicated as Stretch.



Segment 2  Financial Performance



The pre-tax earnings component will provide 50% of the Bonus Formula. The maximum bonus to
be paid for this component is 5%. For pre-tax earnings below Company Plan, 0% bonus is earned. For pre-tax earnings at or above Company Plan, the bonus will be paid on a straight line basis up to the percentages indicated as Stretch.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 117 (Friday, June 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14405]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-22260, F-22265; AK-962-1410-HY-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving the conveyance of surface and 
subsurface estates for certain lands pursuant to the Alaska Native 
Claims Settlement Act will be issued to NANA Regional Corporation, Inc. 
for 69.05 acres located northwesterly of the Native village of 
Buckland, Alaska. Notice of the decision will also be published four 
times in the Arctic Sounder.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until July 20, 2009 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by 
phone at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85e4eeabe7e9e8abe6eaebf3e0fce4ebe6e0c5e4eeabe7e9e8abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="06676d28646a6b2865696870637f6768656346676d28646a6b28616970">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Persons who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

Dina L. Torres,
Land Transfer Resolution Specialist, Resolution Branch.
[FR Doc. E9-14405 Filed 6-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DLD-011 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-3161

___________

DAVID BOOKMAN,

 Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil No. 2-11-cv-03920)

District Judge: Honorable Petrese B. Tucker

____________________________________

Submitted for Possible Summary Action Pursuant to 

Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

October 14, 2011

Before: AMBRO, JORDAN and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: November 3, 2011 )

_________________

OPINION

_________________

PER CURIAM.

On June 14, 2011, David Bookman, a Pennsylvania state inmate, filed a pleading 

styled as a “petition for mandamus,” claiming that the District Court erred when it failed

to make a de novo determination after Bookman filed objections to a Report and 
2

Recommendation in his habeas corpus proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. According to 

Bookman, the District Court denied the habeas petition (which was docketed at E.D. Pa. 

Civ. No. 08-cv-05407) without a de novo review under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and thereby 

denied Bookman due process and equal protection of the law. 

The District Court dismissed the “petition for mandamus” sua sponte, noting that 

its order in the habeas case reflects that it considered Bookman’s objections and approved

of the Report and Recommendation after “careful and independent consideration of the 

petition.” Further, the District Court denied Bookman’s motion for reconsideration in the 

habeas case, and also denied his “Rule 60(b)” motion in which he raised the same 

argument about a purported lack of de novo review. Bookman timely filed this appeal.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and will affirm. There is no record 

support for Bookman’s contention that the District Court failed to conduct a proper 

review after he filed objections to the Report and Recommendation in his habeas case. 

Furthermore, this Court denied a certificate of appealability in the habeas case, explaining 

that Bookman did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right 

on any of his claims. See C.A. No. 10-1507 (order entered May 26, 2010). In short, 

Bookman’s claim that he was deprived of due process or equal protection in the habeas 

case is without merit, and his purported “petition for mandamus,” therefore, was properly 

dismissed. We will summarily affirm the District Court’s judgment. See 3d Cir. LAR 

27.4. Bookman’s motion for summary action is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,505,289
<SECURITIES>                                     8,123
<RECEIVABLES>                                  337,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                    68,194
<INVENTORY>                                    111,542
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,974,178
<PP&E>                                       4,451,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                 735,133
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,007,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          808,185
<BONDS>                                      6,396,799
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,307,197
<PREFERRED>                                    290,545
<COMMON>                                           272
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,231,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,007,560
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               327,134
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               184,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             145,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (420,502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (33,640)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (386,862)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (386,862)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.53)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000824894
<NAME>                         GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP II-A

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                            787,909
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     973,256
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,761,165
<PP&E>                         30,953,574
<DEPRECIATION>                 27,620,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  5,827,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             212,296
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                      5,393,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    5,827,244
<SALES>                         2,645,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,662,499
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,260,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 1,402,403
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             1,402,403
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                    1,402,403
<EPS-BASIC>                          2.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6367

FELIPE FRANCO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00293-RAJ) Submitted: September 5, 2007 Decided: September 19, 2007 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Felipe Franco, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Beatty Martin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Felipe Franco seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Franco has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We grant Franco’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Baldor Electric Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John A. McFarland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                           
|------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ John A. McFarland     
|                    |  |     |  | John A. McFarland         
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer   
|                    |  |     |  | of Baldor Electric Company

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Baldor Electric Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald E. Tucker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                           
|------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Ronald E. Tucker      
|                    |  |     |  | Ronald E. Tucker          
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer   
|                    |  |     |  | of Baldor Electric Company