alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.246

 

SUBLEASE TERMINATION AGREEMENT

 

THIS SUBLEASE TERMINATION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”)  is made and entered into effective as of November 30, 2012 (the “Effective Date”), by and between ADK GEORGIA, LLC, a Georgia limited liability Company (“Sublessor”)  and ADK JEFFERSONVILLE OPERATOR, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“Sublessee”).

 

WITNESSETH:

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Lease (“Master Lease”) dated August 1, 2010, Sublessor leased from William M. Foster (“Lessor”) the premises described and defined in the Master Lease as the Property (the “Property”);

 

WHEREAS, Sublessee subleased that portion of the Property located in Jeffersonville, Georgia consisting of 131 licensed beds (the “Premises”) pursuant to that certain Sublease Agreement and Lessor’s Consent dated as of April 10, 2010 (the “Sublease”); and

 

WHEREAS, Sublessor and Sublessee desire to terminate the Sublease in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, promises, undertakings, and releases herein, the receipt, adequacy, and sufficiency of such consideration being expressly acknowledged, Lessor and Lessee hereby agree as follows:

 

1.                              The foregoing recital of facts is hereby made a part of this Agreement to the same extent as if fully set forth herein. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them above.

 

2.                              The Sublease shall terminate, without further action or notice, on the Effective Date at 11:59 p.m. Each party’s duties and obligations to the other under the Sublease shall terminate as of 11:59 p.m. on the Effective Date.

 

3.                              This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted under the laws of the State of Georgia.

 

{Signatures on Following Page}

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed and sealed as of the date stated on the first page of this Agreement.

 

 

	
 
    	
SUBLESSOR:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
ADK   GEORGIA, LLC,
    
	
 
    	
a   Georgia limited liability company
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Boyd P. Gentry
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
SUBLESSEE:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
ADK   JEFFERSONVILLE OPERATOR, LLC,
    
	
 
    	
a   Georgia limited, liability company
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Christopher F. Brogdon
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
 
    


 

2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1455

OLAKUNLE A. OJO, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A72-416-950) Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: February 8, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.Joshua A. Moses, JOSHUA MOSES & ASSOCIATES, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Joseph F. Ciolino, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Olakunle Ajibola Ojo, a native and citizen of Nigeria, seeks review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying Ojo’s claims for suspension of deportation and voluntarydeparture and ordering him deported. We find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that Ojo is statutorily precluded from demonstrating the good moral character necessary to sustain applications for suspension of deportation or voluntary departure. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101(f) (West 1999). Therefore, we deny Ojo’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 3/31 10-QSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,181,053
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,193,477
<PP&E>                                         178,473
<DEPRECIATION>                                 141,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,359,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          163,988
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,806,369
<COMMON>                                           752
<OTHER-SE>                                     425,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,359,953
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               259,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,661,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,921,023)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,921,023)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,928,023)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC.*

|                                            |  | Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation
|------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Baltimore Gas and Electric Company          |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Holdings, Inc.                |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Investments, Inc.             |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Power, Inc.                   |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Real Estate Group, Inc.       |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Enterprises, Inc.             |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Power Source, Inc.            |  | Delaware                     
|Constellation Energy Source, Inc.           |  | Delaware                     
|Safe Harbor Water Power Corporation         |  | Pennsylvania                 
|BGE Home Products & Services, Inc.          |  | Maryland                     
|CEG Acquisition, LLC                        |  | Delaware                     
|Constellation NewEnergy, Inc                |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Generation Group, LLC         |  | Maryland                     
|Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Inc.    |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Nuclear Services, Inc.        |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Power Source Generation, Inc. |  | Maryland                     
|Constellation Power Source Holdings, Inc.   |  | Maryland                     
|BGE Capital Trust II                        |  | Delaware                     
|Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC.       |  | Delaware                     



136

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 116 (Thursday, June 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14283]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation Advisory Board; 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. I), notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the Advisory Board of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development 
Corporation (SLSDC), to be held from 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. (EDT) on 
Saturday, July 11, 2009, at the Corporation's Administration Building, 
180 Andrews Street, Massena, New York 13662. The agenda for this 
meeting will be as follows: Opening Remarks; Consideration of Minutes 
of Past Meeting; Quarterly Report; Old and New Business; Closing 
Discussion; Adjournment.
    Attendance at the meeting is open to the interested public but 
limited to the space available. With the approval of the Administrator, 
members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. 
Persons wishing further information should contact, not later than 
Monday, July 6, 2009, Anita K. Blackman, Chief of Staff, Saint Lawrence 
Seaway Development Corporation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 
Washington, DC 20590; 202-366-0091.
    Any member of the public may present a written statement to the 
Advisory Board at any time.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on June 12, 2009.
Collister Johnson, Jr.,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-14283 Filed 6-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-61-P
CUSTODIAN AGREEMENT


 


This Deed of Custodian Agreement made in Hong Kong on this the 3rd
January of 2013.


 


Between


 


LUCKYCOM INC., having its registered office
at 4790 CAUGHLIN PKWY STE 387 RENO, NV 89519,USA represented by its President Mr. Kingrich J. Lee hereinafter referred to as the
FUND Owner which expression shall, unless it be repugnant to the context or meeting thereof, include its representatives, successors
in interest and assigns of the First Part.


 


And


 


BHP Capital Markets Hong Kong Ltd, having its
registered office at Level 8, Two Exchange Square, Central, Hong Kong represented by its chief Executive officer Mr. Kingrich J.
Lee, hereinafter referred to as the Custodian which expression shall, unless it be repugnant to the context or meaning thereof,
include its representatives, successors in interest and assigns of the Second Part.


 


Now therefore, with the intent to manage the
LUCKYCOM INC Asian Offering Fund in Hong Kong before remit back to USA as well as contact parties for Asian investors , The Fund
owner and the Custodian hereby mutually agreed between the parties hereto as follows;


 


		1.	The Custodian shall keep the fund in safe custody and pay for the
expenses for Asian operation.



 


		2.	The Custodian should preserve the following documents & information
and perform the following

duties:



		a.	Details of Offering record and subscription agreement for Asian investors(
NON-US Investors)



		b.	Details of receipt and disbursement of the offering funds.



		c.	Details about the shareholder records for the private placements.



		d.	Details of transfer and registration of securities for Asian investors.



		e.	To maintain updated balance position of the fund.



		f.	To maintain book information and to collect/received dividend ,warrant,
interest and installments which accrue against the List firm LUCKYCOM INC. from time to time for Asian investors,



		g.	To furnish all statement/ information to the shareholders, Asian
investor and other relevant laws/rules.



		h.	To handle over LUCKYCOM INC stock certificates to investors. 



 




    	 



    	 



    

 


		3.	LUCKY COM INC shall pay to the custodian a monthly service fee US$5200/month=HK$40300/Month.



 


		4.	LUCKYCOM INC may terminate this agreement at any time with one month
notice and for any reason by providing written notice to the Custodian. At such time, the Custodian will expedite preparation of
its record and custodian fund as Custodian and will deliver the records to its successor or the Company.



 


In Witness Whereof the Fund owner and the Custodian
have caused their common seals to be affixed to these presents and have hereto set their hands the day and year above written


 


The Party of the First Part, the Fund owner


 


FOR LUCKYCOM Inc.


 


/s/ Kingrich J. Lee


Represented by Chief Executive Officer


Mr. Kingrich J. Lee


 


And


 


The party of the Second Part, The custodian


 


FOR BHP CAPITAL MARKETS (HONG KONG) LTD


 


/s/ L.C. Yi


Represented by L. C. Yi


Place: HONG KONG


Date: 3rd Jan 2013








    	2
Exhibit 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

      We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in Registration  Statements
(Nos. 333-155655,  333-118292,  333-118291,  333-78355,  333-44489, 333-5912 and
333-5910) on Form S-8 of Balchem  Corporation  and  subsidiaries  of our reports
dated  March  12,  2009  relating  to our  audit of the  consolidated  financial
statements, the financial statement schedule and internal control over financial
reporting,  which  appear  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  of  Balchem
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008.


/s/McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
New York, New York
March 12, 2009


                                       66
August 14,2003 

JR Mathews 

Quapaw Gaming Corporation 

P.O. Box 765 

Quapaw, OK 74363 

Re: Ultimate Winner's Blackjack Tournament 

Dear Mr. Mathews: 

Thank you for your letter of July 14,2003, which enclosed a proposed format for 

a blackjack tournament. We appreciate the Tribe's willingness to work with NIGC on 

this issue. However, based on the information you have provided, we cannot determine 

$4~ whether or not the proposed blackjack tournament would qualify as a class I1 gaming 

activity. 

The legal basis for concluding that tournament blackjack play constitutes Class I1 

gaming in Oklahoma was set forth in advisory opinions from the NIGC's Office of 

General Counsel in letters dated July 9, 1999, and January 15,2003. Each letter stressed 

the importance of bona fide tournament play as a condition to invoking an exception to 

the general prohibition of gambling card games established in Oklahoma law. 

The materials you provided to us only outline the tournament fees, ranking 

system, prize structure, and duration. For the NIGC to be able to make a determination 

as to whether this tournament qualifies as a class II activity we would need a more 

detailed description of how the tournament proceeds. Specifically, we would need to 

know how participants actually compete in the tournament (i.e. how they are awarded 

points). 

Our advisory opinion of July 9, 1999, indicated that when card tournaments were 

first proposed, it was made clear by the tribes that the prize to be awarded would be 

established independently of the pool of entry fees and tournament participants would not 

be trying to win money from one another but would be competing instead to win the 

prizes offered by the tribe. Based upon the description you submitted us, it would seem 

that the prize being offered was directly related to the entry fees. Your description 

indicated that there would be a "tournament sponsor7' who would determine and collect 4l,*ll 

* 

NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1441 L St NW, Suite 9100. Wash~ngton. DC 20005 Tel- 202.632.7003 Fax 202.632.7066 WWW.NlGC.GOV 

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento. CA; Phoen~x, AZ; St Paul, MN;Tulsa. OK 
W the entry fees as well as award prizes. If the sponsor is an individual or entity other than 

the Tribe or the casino, we would need to know their identity. 

We request that you provide us with a more detailed description of the proposed 

tournament. If you have any questions please contact John Hay at (202) 632-7003. 

Sincerely yours, 

pqw Penny J. Coleman 

Acting General Counsel
Exhibit 32.3
                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-C ("Issuer") for the period
ending  June 30, 2007 as  filed  with  the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 20th day of August, 2007.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-C
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-C and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-C and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Tyrone HURT, Appellant v. Richard M. NIXON, Former President, Appellee.

No. 06-5249.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 30, 2006.

Tyrone Hurt, Washington, DC, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

BEFORE: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the *899brief filed by appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed August 22, 2006, be affirmed. Dismissal with prejudice is justified when a district court determines that “‘allegation of other facts consistent with the challenged pleading could not possibly cure the deficiency.’ ” *Firestone v. Firestone,*76 F.3d 1205, 1209 (D.C.Cir. 1996) (quoting *Jarrell v. United States Postal Serv.,*753 F.2d 1088, 1091 (D.C.Cir. 1985) (other quotations omitted)). The district court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint with prejudice where he could not possibly state a claim for damages resulting from his allegations concerning the late President Nixon.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James M. Holland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the periods presented.











Date:           November 25, 2009                                                                           /s/JAMES
M. HOLLAND


James M. Holland


Senior Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer
97-824.

#### Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. LMI Ins. Co.

Richland App. No. 96CA32. Reported at 78 Ohio St.3d 1470, 678 N.E.2d 579.

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for reconsideration in this ease be, and hereby is, denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Van T. Cung, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[976 NYS2d 904]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah A. Haendiges, J.), rendered September 21, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal contempt in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same memorandum as in *People v Cung*(112 AD3d 1307 [2013]). Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 12.2
 ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(dollars in thousands)
 Twelve Months Ended December 31,2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001Earnings:Income from continuing
operations
    
    $
    170,479
    
    
    $
    199,627
    
    
    $
    180,937
    
    
    $
    199,343
    
    
    $
    280,688Income taxes
    
    
    98,010
    
    
    
    120,030
    
    
    
    86,854
    
    
    
    126,805
    
    
    
    183,136Fixed charges
    
    
    178,437
    
    
    
    181,372
    
    
    
    181,793
    
    
    
    168,985
    
    
    
    166,939Total earnings
    
    $
    446,926
    
    
    $
    501,029
    
    
    $
    449,584
    
    
    $
    495,133
    
    
    $
    630,763Fixed Charges:Interest charges
    
    $
    145,502
    
    
    $
    146,983
    
    
    $
    147,610
    
    
    $
    133,878
    
    
    $
    130,525Amortization of
debt discount
    
    
    4,085
    
    
    
    4,854
    
    
    
    3,337
    
    
    
    2,888
    
    
    
    2,650Estimated interest
portion
of annual rents
    
    
    28,850
    
    
    
    29,535
    
    
    
    30,846
    
    
    
    32,219
    
    
    
    33,764Total fixed charges
    
    $
    178,437
    
    
    $
    181,372
    
    
    $
    181,793
    
    
    $
    168,985
    
    
    $
    166,939Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
Charges (rounded down)
    
    
    2.50
    
    
    
    2.76
    
    
    
    2.47
    
    
    
    2.93
    
    
    
    3.77