alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [F-22260, F-22265; AK-962-1410-HY-P]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

# SUMMARY:

As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an appealable decision approving the conveyance of surface and subsurface estates for certain lands pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to NANA Regional Corporation, Inc. for 69.05 acres located northwesterly of the Native village of Buckland, Alaska. Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the Arctic Sounder.

# DATES:

The time limits for filing an appeal are:

1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected by the decision shall have until July 20, 2009 to file an appeal.

2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.

Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the decision may be obtained from:  Bureau of Land Management,  Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13,  Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:

                        The Bureau of Land Management by phone at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at                         *ak.blm.conveyance@ak.blm.gov.*                         Persons who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.                    

Dina L. Torres,

Land Transfer Resolution Specialist, Resolution Branch.

[FR Doc. E9-14405 Filed 6-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P
1 Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-31343 Summary Calendar

MOHD RIBHE MAHMOUD, Petitioner-Appellant,

VERSUS
IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(97-CV-642) November 12, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: 1
AFFIRMED. See 5 th Cir. R. 47.6.
State of Arizona

Corporation Commission

seal

to all to whom these presents shall come greeting:

I, M.C. hankins, secretary of the arizona corporation commission,
do hereby certify that the annexed is a true and complete
transcript of the

AMENDMENT

TO

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

OF

THE GOLD MINING COMPANY

Extending corporate existence for an additional twenty-five years
which was filed in the office of the said Arizona Corporation
Commission on the 11th day of March A.D. 1936 at 11:00 o'clock
A.M., as provided by law.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,

I have heneunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
arizona corporation commission, at the capitol, in the
city of phoenix this 11th day of March, 1936.

by

Assistant Secretary

Seal
Document

Exhibit 10.1

June 29, 2022
Ronald J. Grensteiner
[REDACTED]
Dear Ron,
On behalf of American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company, I am pleased to confirm our offer of employment. This offer is to transition to your new role effective July 1, 2022 as Vice Chairman of American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company reporting to Anant Bhalla.  Per your retirement from your other offices and directorships with American Equity companies, this will be your only office with us.
Our offer to you is at an annual salary rate of $100,000 per year ($8,333 per month). This position is exempt and at-will. A performance evaluation will be conducted by January 2023 and periodically thereafter.  Your role will not be eligible for STIP and LTIP programs, effective July 1, 2022.  Per the rules of the STIP plan, if you are an active employee at the time of payment in Q1 of 2023, your award amount for the 2022 performance year will be prorated based on the number of days you were in a STIP eligible role – i.e., 6 months – based on your salary and STIP target opportunity as of June 30, 2022. 
As discussed in the offer of employment, you will be eligible to continue to participate in other rewards programs appropriate to a management position (e.g., medical benefits).  You will continue to be eligible for the 401k match and ESOP contributions.  You will be periodically called upon for your advice and perspective as needed.  Also, as discussed, you will be expected to attend American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company Board meetings, and other meetings as requested.  You should maintain your existing laptop and badge to ensure you are able to access the office and communicate on behalf of the company as needed.
Upon acceptance of our offer, please electronically sign this letter below. If you have any questions about this offer, please contact Megan Kohler, Manager, Talent Acquisition at [REDACTED]. You are encouraged to keep a copy for your records, or we can provide one upon request.
We are excited to make this opportunity available to you and know that you will find your new role in our company to be a rewarding event in your career.
Best regards,
Megan Kohler
Manager, Talent Acquisition 
Accepted by:  /s/ Ronald J. Grensteiner
Date: _June 30, 2022
#### DUANE ZIEMBA *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 24402)

Flynn, Gruendel and Harper, Js.

Submitted on briefs April 29

officially released July 5, 2005

*Richard C. Marquette,*special public defender, filed a brief for the appellant (petitioner).

*Timothy J. Liston,*state’s attorney, *Elizabeth M. Moseley,*special deputy assistant state’s attorney, and *Jo Anne Sulik,*assistant state’s attorney, filed a brief for the appellee (respondent).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Duane Ziemba, fails to set forth in his brief any analysis of his claim that the court abused its discretion by denying his petition for *71certification to appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

“We are not required to review issues that have been improperly presented to this court through an inadequate brief. . . . Analysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly. . . . The petitioner has provided us with nothing more than conclusory assertions.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) *Blakeney*v. *Commissioner of Correction,*47 Conn. App. 568, 586, 706 A.2d 989, cert. denied, 244 Conn. 913, 713 A.2d 830 (1998).

The appeal is dismissed.
97-570.

#### State v. Wimberly.

Summit App. No. 17693. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.
----

**Exhibit 32.2**

**MPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**) 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc., a NewJersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended September30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),I, Martin S. Smiley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), thatto his knowledge: 

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Martin S. Smiley__________________Martin S. Smiley Chief Financial Officer 

November 15, 2004 

----
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-B  ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 12th day of August, 2005.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-B
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited Partnership  II-B and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-B and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Exhibit 32.2 

MPHASE TECHNOLGIES, INC. 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhaseTechnologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the "Report"), I, Martin S. Smiley, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, Iall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

/s/ Martin S. Smiley 

Martin S. Smiley Chief Financial Officer 

May 14, 2008 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1523

DIANE M. KENT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; DANA WHITT, Lieutenant;

AURORA BULLOCK,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.

(1:05-cv-02593-RDB)

Submitted: April 14, 2008 Decided: May 8, 2008

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas R. Taylor, Kensington, Maryland, for Appellant. Douglas F.

Gansler, Attorney General of Maryland, M. Cecilia Hellrung,

Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Diane M. Kent appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment in favor of her former employer and individual

supervisors on her claims of retaliation and discrimination brought

under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2000), 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2000), and Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e

to 2000e-17 (2000). This court reviews a district court’s order

granting summary judgment de novo, drawing reasonable inferences in

the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Doe v. Kidd, 501

F.3d 348, 353 (4th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 2008 WL

112249 (U.S. Sept. 19, 2007) (No. 05-1570). Summary judgment may

be granted only when “there is no genuine issue as to any material

fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of

law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). With this standard in mind, we have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kent v.

Maryland Transp. Auth., No. 1:05-cv-02593-RDB (D. Md. May 1, 2007).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32(a)**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Mayo A. Shattuck III, Chairman of the Board, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Constellation Energy Group, Inc., certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(i)     The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)    Theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Constellation Energy Group, Inc.
| /s/ MAYO A. SHATTUCK III                                                           |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Mayo A. Shattuck III  Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

Date: February 27,2007

----
Exhibit 23.1


                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of Signet Banking Corporation, or most recent post-effective
amendments thereto, filed prior to March 14, 1997, of our report dated January
22, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Signet
Banking Corporation included in the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996:

                  - Form S-8 (2-82600)               - Form S-3 (33-4491)
                  - Form S-8 (33-2498)               - Form S-3 (33-21963)
                  - Form S-8 (33-43190)              - Form S-3 (33-28089)
                  - Form S-8 (33-10637)              - Form S-3 (2-92081)
                  - Form S-8 (33-47591)              - Form S-3 (33-54803)
                  - Form S-8 (33-47590)
                  - Form S-8 (33-57455)
                  - Form S-8 (33-022996)


                                                     ERNST & YOUNG LLP





Richmond, Virginia
March 14, 1997
#### Debra Ayer Harris, Appellant, v Kevin James Harris, Respondent.

[978 NYS2d 294]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Thomas, J.), dated March 13, 2012, which, upon a decision of the same court dated December 9, 2011, made after a nonjury trial, inter alia, awarded custody of the parties’ children to the father.

Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Modification of an existing court-sanctioned custody arrangement is permissible only upon a showing that there has been a change in circumstances such that modification is necessary to ensure the best interests of the children *(see Matter of Sidorowicz v Sidorowicz,*101 AD3d 737, 738 [2012]; *Matter of Englese v Strauss,*83 AD3d 705, 706 [2011]; *Matter of Said v Said,*61 *888AD3d 879, 880 [2009]). As custody determinations turn in large part on assessments of the credibility, character, temperament, and sincerity of the parties, the Supreme Court’s determination should not be disturbed unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record *(see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 173-174 [1982]). Here, the Supreme Court’s determinations that there had been a change in circumstances, and that a transfer of custody of the parties’ children to the father would be in the children’s best interests, have a sound and substantial basis in the record and, thus, should not be disturbed *(see Matter of Bennett v Schultz,*110 AD3d 792 [2013]; *Matter of Doroski v Ashton,*99 AD3d 902 [2012]; *Matter of Tobar v Velez-Molina,*95 AD3d 1224 [2012]).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Dickerson, J.E, Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.

Appeal by the plaintiff Debra Ayer Harris, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 13, 2012. By order to show cause dated March 14, 2013, inter alia, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal from so much of the judgment as pertains to visitation on the ground that it has been rendered academic by a subsequent stipulation on the issue of visitation entered into between the parties on November 7, 2012. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 1, 2013, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied. Dickerson, J.E, Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.
96-2430.

#### Hoeffel v. Henry Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

Henry App. No. 7-95-9. Reported at 77 Ohio St.3d 1547, 674 N.E.2d 1186. On motion for reconsideration, motion for leave to file motion for reconsideration by *amicus curiae*Ohio Nurses Association, and motion for leave to file motion for reconsideration by *amicus curiae*Ohio Board of Nursing. Motions denied.

Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissents.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Demetrius McGee, Appellant.

Submitted May 21, 2012;

decided May 31, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and David C. Schopp, Esq., Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., 237 Main Street, Suite 1602, Buffalo, New York 14203 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his or her
capacity as an officer of ASI Technology Corporation (the "Company"), that, to
his or her knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, as amended,
for the period ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





Dated:
March 15, 2010




/s/ JERRY E.
      POLISJerry E. Polis,
      President and Principal Executive Officer of ASI Technology
      Corporation/s/ ERIC M.
      POLISEric
      M. Polis, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of ASI Technology
      Corporation
# Funding Opportunities for Predoctoral Researchers

The following funding opportunities are available through NIMH for individuals in the predoctoral stage of training.

NIMH strongly encourages prospective applicants to consult with the **NIMH Research Training and Career Development representative** in the appropriate Division well in advance of preparing an application. The Program Officer will discuss the relevance of your proposed research to the Institute’s research priorities, provide guidance on the proposed research and training plans, and help identify the most appropriate funding opportunity for your research and training.

* The NIH RePORTER is an electronic tool that allows users to search a repository of both intramural and extramural NIH-funded research projects. 

****** The NIH RePORTER query for the F31 Predoctoral Awards includes Parent F31 and the Parent F31 – Diversity.

Read the NIMH NRSA Fellowship FAQs to learn more. 

NRSA Policy Updates ** – Applicants are strongly encouraged to review NRSA policy updates before submitting an application. Failure to follow relevant policies may lead you to submit an incomplete application, which will not be reviewed. Relevant policy notices can also be found in the “Related Notices” section of each funding announcement.

### NIMH-specific policies and other relevant notices

                  - NIMH National Research Service Awards (NRSA) Practices and Guidance
                  - NOT-OD-23-076:  Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA) Stipends, Tuition/Fees and Other Budgetary Levels Effective for Fiscal Year 2023 **
|  By:                            |   /s/   JEFFREY              STEINER |   |   |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                 |                                                          |   |   |
|  Print              Name:       |  Jeffrey              J. Steiner                         |   |   |
|                                 |                                                          |   |   |
|  Title:                         |  Chief              Executive Officer                    |   |   |
|                                 |                                                          |   |   |
|  Certification              Is: |  Without              Qualification                      |   |   |
|                                 |                                                          |   |   |
|  Date:                          |  March              24, 2006                             |   |   |
|                                 |                                                          |   |   |