alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

Section 906 Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

       General Partner

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral                                   

Name: Brenda G. Gujral

Title: President of the General Partner and

          Principal Executive Officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P

Date: November 12, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATS Medical, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John R. Judd,
Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                      /s/ John R. Judd
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      John R. Judd
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                                      December 2, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ATS Medical, Inc. and will be retained by ATS Medical, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       19
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,789]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 14, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Bracalente Manufacturing Company, Inc., Trumbaursville, Pennsylvania.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of May 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13902 Filed 6-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Narun Nahar, Respondent, v Abdul J. Awan et al., Appellants.

[821 NYS2d 894]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated August 17, 2004, which granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to enter judgment upon their default in appearing or answering and setting the matter down for an inquest on the issue of damages, (2) from a judgment of the same court (Partnow, J), dated June 2, 2005, which, after an inquest on the issue of damages, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $75,000, and (3), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court (Partnow, J.), dated September 16, 2005, as denied those branches of their motion which were to vacate their *681default in appearing or answering the complaint and for leave to serve and file an answer.

Ordered that the appeals from the order dated August 17, 2004 and the judgment are dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order or judgment made upon the default of an appealing party *(see*CPLR 5511; *Wiener v Iwachiw,*22 AD3d 747 [2005]; *Matter of Baptiste v Emmanuel,*21 AD3d 503 [2005]; *Catania v DeCintio,*9 AD3d 378 [2004]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated September 16, 2005 is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

A defendant seeking to vacate a default must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the delay in appearing and answering the complaint and a meritorious defense to the action *(see*CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; *Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co.,*67 NY2d 138, 141 [1986]; *Gray v B. R. Trucking Co.,*59 NY2d 649, 650 [1983]). The defendants failed to offer a reasonable excuse for the delay in this case. The defendants were already in default when they retained their former attorney to represent them in this action. Furthermore, even if their former attorney was responsible for some of the delay, the defendants subsequently received notice of the scheduled inquest on damages, but took no steps to vacate their default and to serve an answer until after the plaintiff attempted to enforce the judgment against a bank account *(see Robinson v 1068 Flatbush Realty, Inc.,*10 AD3d 716 [2004]; *Eretz Funding v Shalosh Assoc.,*266 AD2d 184 [1999]; *MRI Enters, v Arnanat,*263 AD2d 530 [1999]; *Perellie v Crimson’s Rest.,*108 AD2d 903 [1985]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying those branches of the defendants’ motion which were to vacate their default and for leave to serve and file an answer. Florio, J.P, Santucci, Mastro, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6636

RANDY DEAN STEWART, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:05-cv-00996-JAB) Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 1, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy Dean Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Mary Carla Hollis, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Randy Dean Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stewart has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The  undersigned  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-F ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 14th day of November, 2002.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP II-F
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE> 68
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                              Form 10-K Year Ended December 31, 2003

                                           EXHIBIT 11

                                 COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                                                              Year Ended December 31
                                              ---------------------------------------------------------
                                                     2003                 2002                2001
                                              -----------------    -----------------    ---------------
<S>                                           <C>                  <C>                  <C>
Basic:
  Average number of Class A and
   Class B shares outstanding                       14,562,310           14,609,727         15,153,577
                                              =================    =================    ===============

  Net income                                       $33,075,554          $12,365,636         $5,390,495
                                              =================    =================    ===============

  Per Share Amount                                      $ 2.27               $ 0.85             $ 0.36
                                              =================    =================    ===============


Diluted:
  Average number of Class A and
   Class B shares outstanding                       14,562,310           14,609,727         15,153,577

  Dilutive stock options--based on
    treasury stock method using higher
    of average or year end market prices               135,659              104,168            105,104
                                              -----------------    -----------------    ---------------
                                      TOTALS        14,697,969           14,713,895         15,258,681
                                              =================    =================    ===============

  Net income                                       $33,075,554          $12,365,636         $5,390,495
                                              =================    =================    ===============

  Per Share Amount                                      $ 2.25               $ 0.84             $ 0.35
                                              =================    =================    ===============


<FN>
Note:  All share, per share and option amounts reflect a five-for-four stock split, effective Feburary 17, 2003.
</FN>
</TABLE>
1 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr ., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-1541

___________ Bola Ajiwoju, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. University of Missouri- * Kansas City, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 27, 2010 Filed: February 3, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Bola Ajiwoju appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his discrimination action. After careful de novo review, see Carter v. St. Louis Univ. , 167 F.3d 398, 400 (8th Cir. 1999), we c onclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the districtcourt. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vernon Paul McLEAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-6606.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 7, 2006.

Vernon Paul McLean, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley D. Ragsdale, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Vernon Paul McLean appeals the district court’s order denying McLean’s motion for discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See United States v. McLean,*No. 0:04-cr-00322-CMC (D.S.C. Mar. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**EXHIBIT 23.3****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8Nos. 333-50132 and 333-75014) pertaining to the 1998 Incentive Compensation Plan of BKF CapitalGroup, Inc. of our reports dated October 17, 2002, January 13, 2003, January 13, 2003, January 13,2003, February 6, 2004, April 11, 2003, January 12, 2004 and January 24, 2005, included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) of BKF Capital Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004 withrespect to our audits of the respective financial statements (not shown separately herein) ofMeadow Lane Associates, L.P., SR Capital Partners, L.P., Greenspring Partners, L.P., PWF CapitalPartners, L.P., Levco Debt Opportunity Partners, L.P., AltVantage Absolute Return Fund, L.P., RCLCapital, L.P. and Alvarado Capital Partners, L.P., respectively./s/ EISNER LLPNew York, New York
95-2594.

#### Derby Downs Ltd. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 94-M-1215. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of the *amicus curias*motion to participate in oral argument scheduled for February 19,1997,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that counsel for Franklin County Auditor, the Ohio State Bar Association, and the Ohio County Auditor’s Association may present argument within the time allotted to appellees pursuant to S.Ct. Prac.R. IX(5).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3503 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3503

 To authorize grants for an international documentary exchange program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 17, 2010

  Mr. Cardin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize grants for an international documentary exchange program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``International Documentary Exchange 
Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY EXCHANGE PROGRAMS.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary of State may award grants, on such 
terms and conditions as the Secretary may determine, to United States 
film makers and nongovernmental organizations that use independently 
produced documentary films to promote better understanding of the 
United States among individuals in other countries.
    (b) Use of Grant Funds.--Grants awarded under subsection (a) shall, 
to the maximum extent practicable, be used--
            (1) to fund, distribute, and promote documentary films that 
        convey a diversity of views about life in the United States to 
        foreign audiences;
            (2) to support the production of documentaries described in 
        paragraph (1) that are made by independent foreign and domestic 
        producers, selected through a peer review process; and
            (3) to develop a network of overseas partners to produce, 
        distribute, and broadcast such documentaries according to the 
        allowable rights of each program.
    (c) Preference Factors.--In awarding grants under this section, the 
Secretary shall give preference to nongovernmental organizations that--
            (1) are as cost effective as possible; and
            (2) have experience supporting independently produced 
        documentary films.
    (d) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit a report to Congress that 
describes in detail the implementation of this section.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of State such sums as may be necessary 
for each of fiscal years 2010 and 2011 to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23 - 30873 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Jawan Fortia,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:14 - CR - 131 - 4

**______________________________** Before **Graves, Willett,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Jawan Fortia was convicted of numerous crimes related to his participation in a New Orleans street gang. On appeal, we vacated one conviction, affirmed the others, vacated the sentence on his drug - trafficking conspiracy conviction , and remanded for resentencing. See United States v. McClaren , 13 F.4th 386 , 418 – 19 (5th Cir. 2021 ). The district court

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 24, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-30873 Document: 51-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/24/2024No. 23 - 30873

2 resentenced Fortia and reentered judgment. He now appeals that judgment but rightly concedes that his arguments are foreclosed by the law - of - the - case doctrine. S ee United States v. Agofsky , 516 F.3d 280, 283 (5th Cir. 2008) . Because summary disposition is appropriate , see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969) , Fortia ’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is **GRANTED** , and the district cour t’s judgment is **AFFIRMED** . Case: 23-30873 Document: 51-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/24/2024
# Benefits

## Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) 

The Federal Employees Health Benefit Program (FEHBP) offers a wide selection of health plans to employees, retirees, and their survivors. You can choose from a variety of plans to cover yourself and family members.

Learn More **

## Federal Employees Group Life Insurance (FEGLI)  

FEGLI provides group term life insurance. As such, it does not build up any cash value or paid-up value. It consists of Basic life insurance coverage and three options. In most cases, if you are a new Federal employee, you are automatically covered by Basic life insurance and your payroll office deducts premiums from your paycheck unless you waive the coverage. In addition to the Basic, there are three forms of Optional insurance that you can elect. You must have Basic insurance in order to elect any of the options. Unlike Basic, enrollment in Optional insurance is not automatic -- you must take action to elect the options.

Learn More **

## Thrift Saving Plan ( TSP)

The TSP is a retirement savings plan for civilians who are employed by the United States Government and members of the uniformed services

Learn More **

## Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program (FLTCIP)  

The Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program provides long term care insurance to help pay for costs of care when you need help with activities you perform every day, or you have a severe cognitive impairment, such as Alzheimer's disease. Over 20 million members of the Federal Family can apply for the insurance offered in this Program.

Learn More **

## Flexible Spending Accounts for Federal Employees (FSAFEDS)  

FSAFEDS is a Flexible Spending Account (FSA) program for Federal employees that will save you money on health and dependent care expenses by allowing you to set aside pre-tax funds to pay for a wide range of common out-of-pocket expenses.

Learn More **

## Dental

The Federal Dental program provides eligible Federal employees, retirees and their eligible family members on an enrollee-pay-all basis. Employees can enroll in a plan for Self Only, Self plus one or Self and Family.

Learn More **

## Vision

The Federal Vision program provides eligible Federal employees, retirees and their eligible family members on an enrollee-pay-all basis. Employees can enroll in a plan for Self Only, Self plus one or Self and Family.

Learn More **

## Fitness Reimbursement Program (BLM Internal Use Only)  

                      - Fitness IM : Fitness Membership Fee Reimbursement Program
                      - Informed Consent & Waiver Form
                      - Report Of Taxable Fringe Benefit
                      - Self Certification Of Usage

## Human Resources

-  Human Resources Contacts 
-  Benefits 
-  eOPF 
-  Employee Relations 
-  Ethics 
-  Forms 
-  Jobs and Human Resources 
-  Telework 
-  OWCP 
-  Performance Management 
-  Rating Management 
-  Retirement 
-  Security 
-  Manager’s Corner