alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF BANTA CORPORATION

                                             OWNERSHIP BY           STATE OR
                                           ANTA CORPORATION       JURISDICTION
                                            OR ONE OF IT'S      OF INCORPORATION
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES                         SUBSIDIARIES       OR ORGANIZATION
--------------------                       ----------------     ----------------

Banta Direct Marketing, Inc.                    100%               Minnesota
Banta Europe BV                                 100%            The Netherlands
Banta Healthcare Group, Ltd.                    100%               Wisconsin
Banta Security Printing, Inc.                   100%               Wisconsin
Banta Global Turnkey B.V.                       100%            The Netherlands
Banta Global Turnkey Ltd.                       100%                Ireland
Banta Global Turnkey Ltd.                       100%               Scotland
Banta Packaging & Fulfillment, Inc.             100%               Wisconsin
Banta Specialty Converting, LLC.                100%               Wisconsin
Danbury Printing & Litho, Inc.                  100%               Minnesota
Banta Integrated Media - Cambridge, Inc         100%             Massachusetts
United Graphics, Inc.                            100%              Washington
Wrapper, Inc.                                   100%               Wisconsin
Banta Publications-Greenfield, Inc.             100%                 Ohio
Banta Direct Marketing-Berkeley, Inc.           100%               Minnesota
Meadows Information Systems, Inc.               100%               Wisconsin
Greenfield Holdings Corp.                       100%             Pennsylvania
Type Designs, Inc.                              100%`               Georgia
Banta Holding Corp.                             100%               Wisconsin
Banta Hong Kong,Ltd.                            100%               Hong Kong
Banta Global Turnkey (Singapore)
 Pte. Ltd.                                      100%               Singapore
Banta Southeastern, Inc.                        100%               Tennessee
Banta Finance Corporation                       100%               Minnesota
Banta Global Turnkey - Guadalajara
 Sde RL de CV                                   100%                Mexico
BGT Services, Guadalajara Sde RL de CV          100%                Mexico
BGT - US, LLC                                   100%               Wisconsin
Banta Global Turnkey, Ltd.                      100%           Texas Partnership
Banta G. Imagen, S. de R.L. de C.V.              50%                Mexico
Banta Global Turnkey Kft.                       100%                Hungary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000842881
<NAME> GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-E
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         613,587
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  430,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,043,796
<PP&E>                                      17,074,642
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,654,413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,819,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          216,826
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,543,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,819,672
<SALES>                                        780,293
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               784,504
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,488,791
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (704,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (704,287)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (704,287)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Selbin Martinez, Appellant.

Submitted June 24, 2013;

decided September 3, 2013

*1051Motion to strike page 520 of appellant’s appendix and references thereto in appellant’s brief granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                      44,759,579
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              689,534,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                23,244,410
<INVENTORY>                                513,814,855
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,323,768,319
<PP&E>                                   1,724,097,716
<DEPRECIATION>                             768,030,025
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,761,628,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    1,034,512,878
<BONDS>                                    655,908,616
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                               1,118,253,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,761,628,721
<SALES>                                  4,839,773,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         4,929,948,668
<CGS>                                    4,717,476,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,028,918
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          31,480,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             60,954,908
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,375,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         55,579,908
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                55,579,908
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-2461

___________

Gerry C. DuBose, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Janet E. Andrews, individually and as *

an agent of Hennepin County Medical * [UNPUBLISHED]

Center and Hennepin Faculty *

Associates; Ngoci J. Wamuo, *

individually and as an agent of *

Hennepin County Medical Center and *

Hennepin Faculty Associates; Hennepin *

County Medical Center; Hennepin *

Faculty Associates, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: September 12, 2002

 Filed: October 2, 2002

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit

Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jonathan

G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

-2-

Gerry DuBose appeals the district court’s1 dismissal without prejudice of his

civil complaint. After careful de novo review, we agree with the district court’s

conclusion that DuBose’s complaint did not state a cause of action actionable in

federal court. Further, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of

DuBose’s motion for leave to amend his complaint, or in the denial of his

postjudgment motion seeking reconsideration of the court’s judgment.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 23(b)

 

 

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendments No. 3 and 5A on Form S-8 and their related prospectuses to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 33-54298) of Entergy Corporation, Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-02503 and 333-22007) of Entergy Corporation and Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-98179, 333-90914, 333-75097, 333-55692, and 333-68950) of Entergy Corporation of our report dated March 4, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Entergy- Koch, LP included in Exhibit 99(a) in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Entergy Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

							                                                                                            							/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Houston, TexasMarch 8, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 116 (Thursday, June 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,526A]


North American Lighting, Inc., Salem, IL Plant, Including On-Site 
Leased Workers From Westaff, Manpower, and Salem Business Center, 
Salem, IL; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on April 21, 2009, applicable to workers of North 
American Lighting, Inc., Salem, IL Plant, Salem, Illinois including on-
site leased workers from Westaff, Manpower, and Select. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on May 7, 2009 (74 FR 21406).
    At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of exterior automotive lighting--signal lighting.
    The company reports that it incorrectly identified Select as one of 
the three leasing agencies with workers working on-site at the Salem, 
Illinois location of North American Lighting, Salem IL Plant. Salem 
Business Center is the third leasing agency, not Select. Accordingly, 
the Department is amending the certification to remove Select as the 
leasing agency and replacing it with workers from Salem Business Center 
working on-site at the Salem, Illinois location of the subject firm.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,526A is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of North American Lighting, Salem, IL Plant, Salem, 
Illinois, including on-site leased workers from Westaff, Manpower, 
and Salem Business Center, who became totally or partially separated 
from employment on or after November 21, 2007 through April 21, 
2011, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 
223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for 
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 14th day of May 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-14330 Filed 6-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
(c) **Advance Payment.** Upon the Employee’s (i) continuous employment with the Companythrough March 15, 2009, or, if earlier, the Employee’s separation from service by the Company otherthan for Cause, and (ii) satisfaction of the Participation Criteria and Company Criteria set forthin the Plan as relates to the Advance Payment Date, the Employee shall be entitled to an AdvancePayment Benefit of $111,375 on March 13, 2009, representing 25 percent of the Adjusted IncentivePayment Benefit. Applicable insurance contributions, payroll withholding and taxes shall bededucted from any payment.Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Employee shall not have a vested or legallybinding right to payment of compensation or benefits hereunder prior to the applicable AdvancePayment Date.     (d) In consideration of the increase in the Incentive Payment Benefit and the agreement tomake an Advance Payment of 25 percent of the Adjusted Incentive Payment Benefit as described inSection 4(c), the Employee hereby agrees that through June 30, 2009 he will not (i) directlycompete with the business of the Company, (2) engage in any business in direct competition with theCompany, or (3) solicit or encourage others to so compete. The obligation of the Employee setforth in this Section 4(d) shall survive the termination for cause or resignation of Employee’semployment with the Company prior to June 30, 2009, but shall terminate upon the occurrence of aTriggering Event.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed by its officerthereunto duly authorized, and the Employee has hereunto set his hand, all as of the day and yearfirst above written.             **EMPLOYEE**   **MICHAEL BAKER CORPORATION**               /s/ John D. Whiteford   By: Bradley L. Mallory           John D. Whiteford     Title: President and CEO
Order filed May 24, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00357

- CV

____________ SEECO, INC. AND SOUT HWESTERN ENERGY COMP ANY , Appellant s
V. K.T. ROCK, L

. L

. C

. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 69705



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed April 1 1 , 2012. To date, the filing fee of $175.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellants are excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. See Tex. R. App . P

. 5 . Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant s are ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $175.00 to the Clerk of this court
on or before June 8 , 2012. See Tex. R. App . P. 5. If appellant s fail to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
JUN u jm 

Mr. D. Fred Matt 

Chairman Tribal Council 

Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes 

P.O. Bax 278 

Pablo, Montana 59855 

RE: Amendment #4 to the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes Gaming Ordinance 

92D 

Dear Mr. Matt: 

This letter responds to your request to the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) 

for the review and approval of the amendment to the Confederated Salish and Kootenai 

Tribes' (Tribes) gaming ordinance that we received on May 7,2003. The Tribes adopted 

this Amendment No. 4 to Ordinance 92-D, Section 2.01, by an enactment of the Tribal 

Council on April 29,2003. This letter constitutes approval of your amendment under the 

Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA). It is important to note that the gaming ordinance 

is approved for gaming only on Indian lands, as defined in the IGRA, over which the 

Tribes exercise jurisdiction. 

Thank you for submitting the Tribes' amendment to the tribal gaming ordinance. The 

NIGC staff and I look forward to worlung with you and the Tribes on hture gaming 

issues. If you have any questions or require further assistance, please contact Ms. 

Frances Fragua at 202-632-7003. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Philip N. Hogen 

Chairman 
Ordinance 92-D 

Amendment No. #4 

ORDINANCE 

OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF 

THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBES 

OF THE FLATHEAD RESERVATION, MONTANA 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE TRIBAL COUNCIL OF THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND 

KOOTENAI TRIBES THAT AMENDMENT NO. 4 SHALL AMEND ORDINANCE 92-D 

AS FOLLOWS: 

Section 2.01, Establishment of Commission, is rescinded in its entirety and replaced with a new Section 

2.01 as follows: 

The CS&KT Tribal Gaming Commission shall consist of five (5) Commissioners. A 

Commissioner shall serve for three (3) years. All five (5) Commissioners must be enrolled tribal 

members who physically reside within the exterior boundaries of the Reservation during the three (3) 

year term and must be at least twenty-one (2 1) years of age. Vacancies on the Commission shall be 

filled within thirty (30) days by nominations and a majority vote of the Tribal Council. The Tribal 

Council shall select annually, from the membership of the Commission, a Commission Chair. 

CERTIFICATION 

The foregoing Amendment No. 4 to Ordinance 92-D was adopted by the Tribal Council on the 29th 

day of April, 2003, with a vote of 6 for, 0 opposed and 2 not voting, pursuant to authority 

vested in it by Article VI, Section 1 (i), (n) and (u) of the Tribes' Constitution and Bylaws; said 

Constittilicjn adopted and approved ilnder Section 16 of the Act of Jme 18, 1933 (48 Stat. 981), as 

amended. 

ATTEST: .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     Sep-30-1998
<CASH>                           2,191,406
<SECURITIES>                     000
<RECEIVABLES>                    176,542
<ALLOWANCES>                     361,435
<INVENTORY>                      000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 2,367,948
<PP&E>                           25,987,000
<DEPRECIATION>                   19,098,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   9,256,402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            1,726,811
<BONDS>                          000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            000
<PREFERRED>                      000
<COMMON>                         000
<OTHER-SE>                       7,357,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     9,256,402
<SALES>                          000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 3,834,434
<CGS>                            000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 3,250,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  587,803
<INCOME-TAX>                     000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              587,803
<DISCONTINUED>                   000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  000
<CHANGES>                        000
<NET-INCOME>                     587,803
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                    .12
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Approved Tribal-State Compact.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes approval of the 2009 Amendments to the Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians (“Tribe”) and the State of Wisconsin Gaming Compact of 1991.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         June 17, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paula L. Hart, Acting Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. This Amendment allows the Tribe to play poker and other card games; pari-mutuel, keno, craps and other dice games; roulette, big wheel and other wheel games; and electronic and video facsimile versions of any authorized game. This Amendment also allows for a 25-year term limit with an automatic 25-year renewal unless served notice of nonrenewal.                

Dated: June 9, 2009.

Larry Echo Hawk,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. E9-14260 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7141

LUKE D. PATTERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Martinsburg. Robert W. Trumble, Magistrate Judge. (3:20-cv-00074-GMG-RWT)

Submitted: December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luke D. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Luke D. Patterson appeals the magistrate judge’s orders denying his motion to waive 

the filing fee and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. 

Patterson v. United States, No. 3:20-cv-00074-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. June 11, 2020; 

July 14, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
THE STATE OF UTAH
STATE TAX COMMISSION

101 State Office Bldg.
SALT LAKE CITY

June 10, 1970

IN REPLY REFER TO:

DIVISION:
Auditing

ATTENTION:
James M. Haran

Mr. Richard M. Lade
Box 6
Skyforest, Calif. 92385

Re: Crown Oil Company

Dear Mr. Lade:

Thank you for your letter of June 6, 1970 in which you advise that the
subject Corporation was merged into Bagdad-Chase Inc. on August 14, 1968.

We have to advise that in order to have the merger made a matter of
official record in the State of Utah, a copy of the merger as approved
by the Secretary of State of the home State of the Corporation should
be filed with the Utah Secretary of State. Until such time as this is
done, we are required to carry Crown Oil Company on our franchise tax
rolls.

We would appreciate your letting us know of the action taken so as to
permit us to determine the tax status of the corporation.

Respectfully yours,
STATE TAX COMMISSION
James M. Haran

Corporation Collections
Auditing Division