alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
0 MEANS NOT APPLICABLE OR NOT SEPARATELY DISCLOSED. THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S AUDITED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             433
<SECURITIES>                                     1,242
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,950
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         49,199
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,233
<SALES>                                          8,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,279
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,378
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,640
<INCOME-TAX>                                       608
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,032  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,032  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.97   
        

</TABLE>
Schedule of Omitted Documents



 Exhibit 10.15 
 Schedule of Omitted Documents 
 of CNL Healthcare Properties, Inc.

 The following property management agreements have not been filed as exhibits pursuant to Instruction 2 of Item 601
of Regulation S-K: These documents are substantially identical in all material respects to Exhibit 10.11 to this Form 8-K. 
  

	 	1.	Property Management Agreement effective July 10, 2013, between Healthcare Equity Partners, LLC and CHP Knoxville Plaza B MOB Owner, LLC 


 

	 	2.	Property Management Agreement effective July 10, 2013, between Healthcare Equity Partners, LLC and CHP Central Wing Annex MOB Owner, LLC 


 

	 	3.	Property Management Agreement effective July 10, 2013, between Healthcare Equity Partners, LLC and CHP Jefferson Commons Condo MOB Owner, LLC
EXHIBIT 21
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                      SUBSIDIARIES

Owned By                                               Jurisdiction of
Registrant                                              Incorporation         Percentage
----------                                              -------------         ----------
<S>                                                     <C>                      <C>
DCA Medical Services, Inc.(1)                           Florida                  64.8%

DCA of SO. GA., LLC(2)                                  Delaware                 45.5%

DCA of Vineland, LLC(3)                                 New Jersey               52.0%

Dialysis Corporation of America                         Florida                  64.8%

Dialysis Services of NJ, Inc. -
         Manahawkin(3)                                  New Jersey               52.0%

Dialysis Services of NJ, Inc. -
         Toms River(1)*                                 New Jersey               64.8%

Dialysis Services of PA., Inc. - Carlisle(3)            Pennsylvania             52.0%

Dialysis Services of PA., Inc. - Chambersburg(3)        Pennsylvania             52.0%

Dialysis Services of PA., Inc. - Lemoyne(1)             Pennsylvania             64.8%

Dialysis Services of PA., Inc. - Wellsboro(1)           Pennsylvania             64.8%

Lytton Incorporated(4)                                  Ohio                     70.8%

Renal Services of Pa., Inc.(1)*                         Pennsylvania             64.8%

Techdyne, Inc.                                          Florida                  70.8%

Techdyne (Europe) Ltd.(4)                               Scotland                 70.8%

Techdyne (Livingston) Limited(4)                        Scotland                 70.8%
-----------------
</TABLE>
* inactive

(1)      Owned 100% by Dialysis Corporation of America.
(2)      Owned 70% by Dialysis Corporation of America.
(3)      Owned 80% by Dialysis Corporation of America.
         Group, Inc.
(4)      Owned 100% by Techdyne, Inc.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,Martin Smiley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C.Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

 

1.          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

February22, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000851724
<NAME>                         GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP II-G

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                            654,894
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     856,237
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,511,131
<PP&E>                         23,412,290
<DEPRECIATION>                 19,800,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  5,200,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              61,410
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                      5,086,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    5,200,575
<SALES>                         2,283,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,335,584
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     958,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 1,376,956
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             1,376,956
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                    1,376,956
<EPS-BASIC>                          3.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000854062
<NAME>                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP II-H

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                   229,230
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            202,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         431,997
<PP&E>                                 5,519,138
<DEPRECIATION>                         4,694,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,274,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     15,329
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             1,248,262
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,274,607
<SALES>                                  829,411
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         860,251
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            332,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          527,325
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      527,325
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             527,325
<EPS-BASIC>                                 5.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
O MEANS NOT APPLICABLE OR NOT SEPARATELY DISCLOSED. THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S AUDITED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,666
<SECURITIES>                                     6,679
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,979
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             609
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         63,307
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,175
<SALES>                                          9,376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,376
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,940
<INCOME-TAX>                                       717
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,223
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,223
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.75
        

</TABLE>
96-2636.

#### Loreto Dev. Co. v. Chardon.

Geauga App. Nos. 95-G-1920 and 95-G-1923. Reported at 78 Ohio St.3d 1410, 675 N.E.2d 1249. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted; *sua sponte,*discretionary appeal allowed.

Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
**Exhibit32.1**

**Certifications ofCEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Houston Wire & Cable Company (the “Corporation”)for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Charles A. Sorrentino,as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, and Nicol G. Graham, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Corporation, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| /s/ Charles A. Sorrentino |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Charles A. Sorrentino     |   |
| Chief Executive Officer   |   |
|                      |   |
| May 2, 2007               |   |
|                      |   |
| /s/ Nicol G. Graham       |   |
| Nicol G. Graham           |   |
| Chief Financial Officer   |   |
|                      |   |
| May 2, 2007               |   |

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed byHouston Wire & Cable Company for purposes of section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.

----
EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
-------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-50082) pertaining to Bandag, Incorporated Stock Award Plan of our
report dated January 24, 2003, except as to Note 19 as to which the date is
March 19, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Bandag, Incorporated included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2002.


Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, IL
March 21, 2003

                                      -62-
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A0590. JESSICA L. DELONG v. NICHOLAS A. DELONG

This case was docketed by this court on November 14, 2023, and appellant’s

brief and enumerations of error were due December 4, 2023. As of the date of this

order, appellant still has not filed a brief and enumeration of errors and has not

requested an extension of time in which to do so. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby

DISMISSED as abandoned pursuant to Court of Appeals Rules 13 and 23.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

December 14, 2023

12/14/2023
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 6, 2010

0929 

# Order

October 6, 2010

141280

CHRISTOPHER DIRLA and APRIL DIRLA, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 141280 COA: 292676 Schoolcraft CC: 06-003811-NI SENEY SPIRIT STORE & GAS STATION and STACEY STACHNIK, Defendants, and

ANDY’S SENEY BAR, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 25, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY 

### , J., would grant leave to appeal.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felicia ROBERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41208.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 2006.

Traci Lynne Kenner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Amy R. Blalock, Wayne R. Dickey, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Felicia Roberson appeals from a guilty-plea conviction for possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute and for aiding and abetting in the offense. *See*21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); 18 U.S.C. § 2.

For the first time on appeal, Roberson argues that the district court erred in im*482posing a sentence under a mandatory guideline scheme, in violation of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). We review for plain error. *See United States v. Valenzuelar-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 732 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 267, 163 L.Ed.2d 240 (2005). Roberson has not shown that the district court would have sentenced her differently under an advisory sentencing scheme. Accordingly, Roberson has failed to show that the district court’s imposition of a sentence under a mandatory guideline scheme was plain error. *See id.*at 733-34.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Kenneth Lane NEUMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas D. BLACKWELL, Honorable; Mike Lynch, Honorable, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-50093

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 24, 2006.

*349Kenneth Lane Neuman, Amarillo, TX, pro se.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Kenneth Lane Neuman, Texas prisoner # 758440, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing, without prejudice, his pro se application for a writ of mandamus. In his application, Neuman urged the court to order a Texas state judge, Mike Lynch, to direct the Texas state judge who presided over Neuman’s 1998 criminal trial, Thomas Blackwell, to vacate Neuman’s conviction and sentence, based on the allegation that Judge Blackwell had not taken the oath of office required by Texas law.

The district court correctly concluded that it lacked the general power to issue a writ of mandamus to direct a state judicial officer in the performance of his duties when mandamus is the only relief sought. *See Moye v. Clerk, DeKalb County Superior Court,*474 F.2d 1275, 1275-76 (5th Cir. 1973); *Noble v. Cain,*123 Fed.Appx. 151, 152-53 (5th Cir.2005) (citing Moye). The court also correctly noted that Neuman had already filed one unsuccessful 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application in the district court and, in this court, an unsuccessful motion for authorization to file a successive § 2254 application. Contrary to Neuman’s suggestion, the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), does not provide an independent basis for mandamus jurisdiction. *See In re Grand Jury Proceedings,*724 F.2d 1157, 1160 (5th Cir.1984).

Neuman’s unauthorized mandamus application amounted only to an effort to avoid statutory restrictions to filing successive collateral attacks upon convictions and sentences. The appeal is without arguable merit, is frivolous, and is therefore dismissed. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Because Neuman has raised the oath-ofoffiee claim in prior attempts to avoid such statutory restrictions, he is hereby warned that any future filings of frivolous pleadings may subject him to sanctions, which may include monetary sanctions or restrictions on filing further pleadings, or both.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 113 (Monday, June 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28293-28294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14075]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Friday, June 19, 
2009 at 11 a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Friday, June 
19, 2009 will be: institution and settlement of injunctive actions; 
institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and other 
matters related to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.


[[Page 28294]]


    Dated: June 10, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-14075 Filed 6-11-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Exhitbit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about August 2, 2010 (the “Report”), I, John B. Howard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:  August 2, 2010
/s/ John B. HowardJohn B. HowardChief Financial OfficerAllianceBernstein Holding L.P.