alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The  undersigned  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-E  ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 14th day of November, 2002.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP II-E
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KELLY DUTTON,

Petitioner

v.

VIRGINA COLEMAN AND WESCO 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 414 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000851724     
<NAME>                             GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PARTNERSHIP II-G
                                    
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                   438,860
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            348,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         787,320
<PP&E>                                23,929,295
<DEPRECIATION>                        19,295,737
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         5,544,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    108,502
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             5,372,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           5,544,855
<SALES>                                2,310,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       3,713,475
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          1,507,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        2,205,729
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    2,205,729
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                           2,205,729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               5.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
 

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO

CONSENT OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.

INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

As independent petroleum engineers, Miller and Lents, Ltd. hereby consents to the use of references in the Form 10-K of EnerJex Resources, Inc. of our estimates of reserves as of December 31, 2010
and to all references to our firm included in this Form 10-K.

The Form 10-K contains references to a certain report prepared by Miller and
Lents, Ltd. for the exclusive use of EnerJex Resources, Inc. The analysis, conclusions, and methods contained in the report are based upon information that was in existence at the time the report was rendered and Miller and Lents, Ltd. has not
updated and undertakes no duty to update anything contained in the report. While the report may be used as a descriptive resource, investors are advised that Miller and Lents, Ltd. has not verified information provided by others except as
specifically noted in the report, and Miller and Lents, Ltd. makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of such information. Moreover, the conclusions contained in such report are based on assumptions that Miller and Lents, Ltd.
believed were reasonable at the time of its preparation and that are described in such report in reasonable detail. However, there are a wide range of uncertainties and risks that are outside of the control of Miller and Lents, Ltd. which may
impact these assumptions, including but not limited to unforeseen market changes, actions of governments or individuals, natural events, economic changes, and changes of laws and regulations or interpretation of laws and regulations.

MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.

Texas Registered
Engineering Firm No. F-1442



|   |  |                                
|-- |  | -------------------------------
|By |  | /s/ Leslie A. Fallon           
|   |  | Leslie A. Fallon Vice
President

Houston, Texas

April 21, 2011

LOGO
EXHIBIT 21.1

 

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

**Subsidiary Name**

**Location of Incorporation or Organization**

 

 

 

 

Angelina Gathering Company, L.L.C.

Texas

 

A.W. Realty Company, LLC

Texas

 

DeSoto Gathering Company, LLC

Texas

 

SWN E & P Services, LLC

Texas

 

SWN Drilling Company, LLC

Texas

 

SWN Energy Services Company, LLC

Texas

 

SWN International, LLC

Delaware

 

SWN Midstream Services Company, LLC

Texas

 

SWN Producer Services, LLC

Texas

 

SWN Production (Arkansas), LLC

Texas

 

SWN Production Company, LLC

Texas

 

SWN Resources Canada, Inc.

Alberta, Canada

SWN Well Services, LLC

Texas
EXHIBIT 23.1

                               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of The Bank of New York Company, Inc. of our report dated February 1, 2002,
included in the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders of The Bank of New York
Company, Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements of The Bank of New York Company, Inc. of our report
dated February 1, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of The Bank of New York Company, Inc. incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001:

Registration Statement Number   Form   Description
-----------------------------   ----   -----------
No. 333-03811                    S-3   Dividend Reinvestment and Stock
                                       Purchase Plan
No. 333-15951                    S-3   Preferred Trust Securities in the
No. 333-15951-01                       amount of $700 million
No. 333-15951-02
No. 333-15951-03
No. 333-15951-04
No. 333-15951-05
No. 333-40837                    S-3   Preferred Trust Securities in the
No. 333-40837-01                       amount of $500 million
No. 333-40837-02
No. 333-40837-03
No. 333-62516                    S-3   Debt Securities, Preferred Stock,
No. 333-62516-01                       Common Stock, and Preferred Trust
No. 333-62516-02                       Securities in the amount of
No. 333-62516-03                       $1.6 billion
No. 333-62516-04
No. 333-70187                    S-3   Debt Securities, Preferred Stock,
No. 333-70187-01                       Common Stock, and Preferred Trust
No. 333-70187-02                       Securities in the amount of
No. 333-70187-03                       $1.3 billion
No. 333-70187-04
No. 333-78685                    S-8   Employees Stock Purchase Plan
                                       Employees Profit Sharing Plan
                                       1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan
                                       1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan
No. 33-56863                     S-8   Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
                                       Employee Preferred Stock Plan and
                                       1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan
No. 33-57670                     S-8   Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
                                       Employee Preferred Stock Plan and
                                       1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan
No. 2-95764                      S-8   1984 Stock Option Plan
No. 33-20999                     S-8   1988 Long-Term Incentive Plan
No. 33-33460                     S-8   Amendment to 1988 Long-Term Incentive
                                       Plan
No. 33-62267                     S-8   Putnam Stock Option Plan


                                                         \s\ Ernst & Young LLP
                                                             Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 25, 2002
J

- A21024

- 14

NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

– SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellant

v.

LISA KIM K. YOUNG,

Appellee No. 942 EDA 2013

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence February 1

, 2013

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 51

- CR

- 0003732

- 2011

BEFORE: BOWES J., OTT, J. and STRASSBURGER, * J.

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED OCTOBER 16, 2014

To the extent that such a light sentence for an assault resulting in a

horrific injury encourages vigilantism, this case troubles me. However, the

Majority correctly analyzed the tria l court’s decision under our standard of

review and concluded that there was no abuse of discretion or misapplication

of the law. Therefore, I join the Majority Memorandum.

___________________ _________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000833526
<NAME> GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-D
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         818,799
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  681,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,500,653
<PP&E>                                      19,682,584
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,845,570
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,200,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          212,129
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,721,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,200,806
<SALES>                                      2,279,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,380,464
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,378,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,002,203
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,002,203
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,002,203
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 117 (Friday, June 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14435]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 55-62335-SP; ASLBP No. 09-891-01-SP-BD01]


David B. Kuhl, II; Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing 
Board

Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972 
(37 FR 28,710), and the Commission's regulations, see 10 CFR 2.103(b), 
2.309, 2.313(a), and 2.318, notice is hereby given that an Atomic 
Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established to preside over 
the following proceeding:

David B. Kuhl, II (Denial of Senior Reactor Operator License)

    This proceeding concerns a request for hearing from David B. Kuhl, 
II, dated May 28, 2009. His request is in response to a denial letter 
from the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) dated May 13, 2009 
notifying him that, following an administrative review, NRR was in 
agreement with Region I's decision of February 20, 2009 not to issue 
him a Senior Reactor Operator License for the Beaver Valley Power 
Station.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Paul S. Ryerson, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Alan S. Rosenthal, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Michael F. Kennedy, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

    As provided in 10 CFR 2.302, all correspondence, documents, and 
other materials shall be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing 
rule, which the NRC promulgated in August 2007 (72 FR 49,139).

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of June 2009.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-14435 Filed 6-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies,
Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Q/A for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Durando, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C.
Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronald A.
DurandoRonald A. Durando Chief Executive Officer

April 21, 2010

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SYBRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AS RESTATED TO REFLECT THE ADOPTION OF
SFAS NO. 128 AND THE MERGER OF NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMPANY AND LRS ACQUISITION
CORP., BOTH ACCOUNTED FOR AS A POOLING OF INTERESTS, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          18,029
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,362
<INVENTORY>                                    158,429
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               379,926
<PP&E>                                         196,164
<DEPRECIATION>                                 147,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,264,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          159,252
<BONDS>                                        699,683
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           986
<OTHER-SE>                                     343,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,264,377
<SALES>                                        605,433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               605,433
<CGS>                                          297,102
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   551
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                100,182
<INCOME-TAX>                                    39,821
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             60,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (673)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    59,688
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58<F1>
<FN>
<F1>(As adjusted for the two-for-one stock split effective February 20, 1998.
Prior Financial Data Schedules other than for the periods ended March 31, 1997
and December 31, 1996 have not been restated to reflect the stock split.) 
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Banta Corporation (the "Corporation") of our report dated January 27, 2003,
included in the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders of Banta Corporation.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of the Corporation for
the year ended December 28, 2002 listed in Item 15(a). This schedule is the
responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule
for the year ended December 28, 2002 referred to above, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 File Nos. 33-40036, 33-54576, 33-61683, 33-01289 and 333-35530 and
Form S-3 File No. 33-55829) pertaining to the Corporation and in the related
prospectuses thereto, of our report dated January 27, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of the Corporation, included in
or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 28, 2002.



/s/ Ernst and Young LLP

ERNST AND YOUNG LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 24, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6726

HENRY L. ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. ROBERT H. MAUNCY, Warden, Northside Correctional Institution, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:07-cv-00061-SB)

Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 27, 2008

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry L. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Henry L. Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). See 28 U.S.C. § 2107 (2000). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Accord Bowles v. Russell , 127 S. Ct. 2360 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on March 24, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed on April 30,

2008. * Because Robinson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

23 facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED