4196 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 14 / Friday, January 23, 2009 / Notices 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

ER–FRL–8589–8] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments 

Availability of EPA comments 

prepared pursuant to the Environmental 

Review Process (ERP), under section 

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 

Policy Act as amended. Requests for 

copies of EPA comments can be directed 

to the Office of Federal Activities at 

202–564–7146. 

An explanation of the ratings assigned 

to draft environmental impact 

statements (EISs) was published in FR 

dated April 6, 2008 (73 FR 19833). 

Draft EISs 

EIS No. 20080415, ERP No. D–FHW– 

L40235–ID, I–90 Post Falls Access 

Improvements Project, Transportation 

Improve from Spokane Street 

Interchange through the State 

Highway 41 (SH–41) Interchange, 

Kootenai County, ID 

Summary: EPA has no objections to 

the proposed project. Rating LO. 

EIS No. 20080389, ERP No. DA–AFS– 

L65369–00, Southwest Idaho 

Ecogroup Land and Resource 

Management Plan, Provide Additional 

Information to Reanalyzes the Effects 

of Current and Proposed Management 

on Rock Mountain Bighorn Sheep 

Viability in the Payette National 

Forest 2003 FEIS, Boise National 

Forest, Payette National Forest and 

Sawtooth National Forest, Forest Plan 

Revision, Implementation, Several 

Counties, ID; Malhaur County, OR 

and Box Elder County, UT. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about disease 

transmission between bighorn sheep 

and domestic sheep, the uncertainty in 

modeling, and monitoring details. 

Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20080442, ERP No. DS–AFS– 

J65469–CO, White River National 

Forest Travel Management Plan, 

Updated Information for the Preferred 

Alternative, To Accommodate and 

Balance Transportation Needs, 

Implementation, Eagle, Garfield, 

Gunnison, Mesa, Moffat, Pitkin, Rio 

Blanco, Routt and Summit Counties, 

CO. 

Summary: EPA’s previous concerns 

were resolved, therefore EPA has no 

objections to the proposed action. 

Rating LO. 

Final EISs 

EIS No. 20080487, ERP No. F–AFS– 

F65035–WA, Cayuga Project, 

Proposed Vegetation and 

Transportation Management 

Activities northeast of Clam Lake, 

Preferred Alternative Selected 

Alternative 7, Great Divide Ranger 

District, Chequamegon-Nicolet 

National Forest, Ashland County, WI. 

Summary: EPA’s concerns about 

marten habitat have been addressed. 

Therefore, EPA has no objections to the 

project. 

EIS No. 20080488, ERP No. F–FHW– 

F40442–MI, Detroit River 

International Crossing Study, Propose 

Border Crossing System between the 

International Border Cities of Detroit, 

Michigan and Windsor, Ontario, 

Wayne County, MI. 

Summary: EPA has no objections to 

the proposed project. 

EIS No. 20080495, ERP No. F–USN– 

K10011–CA, Southern California 

(SOCAL) Range Complex, To 

Organize, Train, Equip, and Maintain 

Combat-Ready Naval Forces, San 

Diego, Orange and Los Angeles 

Counties, CA. 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns about impacts 

to marine resources and ocean water 

quality from munitions. 

EIS No. 20080501, ERP No. F–AFS– 

J65500–00, Wild and Scenic River 

Suitability Study for National Forest 

System Lands on the Ashley, Dixie, 

Fishlake, Manti-La Sal, Uinta and 

Wasatch-Cache National Forests in 

UT and Portion of National Forests 

extend into Colorado and Wyoming, 

several counties, UT, Montrose 

County, CO and Uinta County, WY. 

Summary: No formal comment letter 

was sent to the preparing agency. 

Dated: January 16, 2009. 

Ken Mittelholtz, 

Environmental Protection Specialist, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. E9–1395 Filed 1–22–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–8765–5] 

Science Advisory Board Staff Office; 

Clean Air Scientific Advisory 

Committee (CASAC); Notification of 

Public Teleconferences; of the 

Ambient Air Monitoring & Methods 

(AAMM) Subcommittee 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA or Agency) Science 

Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office 

announces two public teleconferences 

of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory 

Committee (CASAC) Ambient Air 

Monitoring & Methods Subcommittee 

(AAMMS or Subcommittee) to conduct 

consultations concerning ambient air 

monitoring issues related to the 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS) for ozone and particulate 

matter. 

DATES: The meeting dates are Tuesday, 

February 10, 2009, from 11 a.m. to 2 

p.m. (Eastern Time) and Wednesday, 

February 11, 2009, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. 

(Eastern Time). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any 

member of the public who wishes to 

obtain further information concerning 

this public teleconference may contact: 

Ms. Kyndall Barry, Designated Federal 

Officer (DFO), EPA Science Advisory 

Board (1400F), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; 

via telephone/voice mail: (202) 343– 

9868; fax: (202) 233–0643; or e-mail at 

barry.kyndall@epa.gov. General 

information concerning the CASAC can 

be found on the EPA Web site at 

http://www.epa.gov/casac/. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background: The Clean Air Scientific 

Advisory Committee (CASAC) was 

established under section 109(d)(2) of 

the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) (42 

U.S.C. 7409) as an independent 

scientific advisory committee. CASAC 

provides advice, information and 

recommendations on the scientific and 

technical aspects of air quality criteria 

and NAAQS under sections 108 and 109 

of the Act. The CASAC is a Federal 

advisory committee chartered under the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(FACA), as amended, 5 U.S.C., App. The 

CASAC Ambient Air Monitoring & 

Methods Subcommittee (AAMMS) was 

established in 2004 as a standing 

subcommittee of CASAC to provide 

advice and recommendations to the EPA 

Administrator on topics specific to 

ambient air monitoring, methods and 

networks. The Subcommittee will 

comply with the provisions of FACA 

and all appropriate SAB Staff Office 

procedural policies. Section 109(d)(1) of 

the CAA requires that the Agency 

periodically review and revise, as 

appropriate, the air quality criteria and 

the NAAQS for the six ‘‘criteria’’ air 

pollutants, including both ozone (O3) 

and particulate matter (PM). 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES