alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Eon.D.LeonEarp 

Securities Commissioner 

Secretary of State's Office 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: opinion No. O-1629 

Re: Travhling expenses of Securities 

Commissioner to attend conference 

of State's Securities Commissioners 

in Chicago, February 19th and 

2Oth, 1940. 

We have your request for an opinion on the above subject, dated Februsry 

14th and also e copy of tour report to the Secretary of State, dated 

February 23rd, wherein you summarize your conclusions relating to various 

types of securities which may ba offered for registration in Texas which 

conclusions and recomdetions arrived at after ccnference with other 

conferees, ale to be used in determiningthe future policies of your 

department, You have advised the writer that this conference was arranged 

by mutmr'lagreement among the five persona attending same, being yourself, 

the Securities Conmissioners of the respective states of Minnesota, Illinois 

and Florida, and the field secretary of the American Investment Bankers 

Association. 

It is our opinion that khe object of this conference is clearly a State 

&pose. Nor do we believe that the conference constitutes a "convention" 

as that word is used in the general rider to Senate Bill 427 of the 46th 

Lagisla ture. 

Yours very truly 

APPROVED MAR. 12, 1940 ATTORNEY CERERALOFTEXAS 

s/GERALD c. MAN-N 

A!lTORNEY cZ3NEW.L OF TEXAS a/ Walter R. Koch 

THIS OPINION CONSIDERED 

ANDAPPROVED IN LIMITFLD 

CONFERENCE 

bs 

Walter Pi. Koch 

Assistant 

WFX: aw
96-2698.

#### Tosi v. Jones.

Franklin App. No. 96APE04-500. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal.

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
# Children: Anxiety Disorders

### Pediatric Mood and Anxiety Research

**Enrolling locally from the Washington, D.C. metro region**

This pediatric research study seeks to learn how the brain functions in children and adolescents with anxiety and/or depression. This study seeks boys and girls ages 8-17 to participate in research at the NIH Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. Research participation includes brain imaging and computer-based problem solving and memory tasks. Treatment is available over 12-weeks of outpatient visits. Parent and child must consent to participate.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:



(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;



(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.



|       |                                                                  
|------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    | Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation                        
|       | General Partner                                                  
|       |                                                                  
|       |                                                                  
|By:    | /S/ Brenda G. Gujral                                             
|       |                                                                  
|Name:  | Brenda G. Gujral                                                 
|Title: | President of the General Partner and                             
|       | principal executive officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P
|Date:  | July 24, 2006
CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                          SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-A ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies  with the  requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the information  contained  in  the Report fairly  presents,  in all
            material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and   results  of
            operations of the Issuer.

      Dated this 13th day of August, 2002.

                              GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II-A
                              ("Issuer")

                              //S//Dennis R. Neill
                              -------------------------------------
                              Dennis R. Neill
                              President (Chief Executive Officer)

                              //s//Craig D. Loseke
                              -------------------------------------
                              Craig D. Loseke
                              Chief Financial Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3348 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the treatment of 

documents that express disagreement with decisions of the Board of 

Veterans’ Appeals and that are misfiled with the Board within 120 

days of such decisions as motions for reconsideration of such decisions, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2010 

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

treatment of documents that express disagreement with 

decisions of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals and that 

are misfiled with the Board within 120 days of such 

decisions as motions for reconsideration of such decisions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3348 IS

1 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN MISFILED DOCU2 MENTS AS MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION 

3 OF DECISIONS BY BOARD OF VETERANS’ AP4 PEALS. 

5 Section 7103 of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub8 section (d); and 

9 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol10 lowing new subsection (c): 

11 ‘‘(c)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), if a per12 son adversely affected by a final decision of the Board, 

13 who has not filed a notice of appeal with the United States 

14 Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims under section 

15 7266(a) of this title within the period set forth in that 

16 section, files a document with the Board or the agency 

17 of original jurisdiction referred to in section 7105(b)(1) 

18 of this title that expresses disagreement with such decision 

19 not later than 120 days after the date of such decision, 

20 such document shall be treated as a motion for reconsider21 ation of such decision under subsection (a). 

22 ‘‘(2) A document described in paragraph (1) shall not 

23 be treated as a motion for reconsideration of the decision 

24 under paragraph (1) if— 

25 ‘‘(A) the Board or the agency of original juris26 diction referred to in paragraph (1)— 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3348 IS

1 ‘‘(i) receives the document described in 

2 paragraph (1); 

3 ‘‘(ii) determines that such document ex4 presses an intent to appeal the decision to the 

5 United States Court of Appeals for Veterans 

6 Claims; and 

7 ‘‘(iii) forwards such document to the 

8 United States Court of Appeals for Veterans 

9 Claims; and 

10 ‘‘(B) the United States Court of Appeals for 

11 Veterans Claims receives such document within the 

12 period set forth by section 7266(a) of this title.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (09-050)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

# SUMMARY:

Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

# DATES:

June 16, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert M. Padilla, Patent Counsel, Ames Research Center, Code 202A-4, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000; telephone (650) 604-5104; fax (650) 604-2767.

NASA Case No. ARC-16298-1: Nanotechnology-Based Supercapacitor.

Dated: June 10, 2009.

Richard W. Sherman,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. E9-14058 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### Rite Capital Group, LLC, et al., Respondents, v LMAG, LLC, et al., Defendants, and Zeg Enterprises, Inc., Appellant.

Submitted March 19, 2012;

decided May 1, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, 	Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Juan Torres, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), rendered January 8, 2013, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), rendered January 8, 2013, reversed, on the law, and accusatory instrument is dismissed.</p><p>The misdemeanor information charging defendant with disorderly conduct by obstructing pedestrian traffic (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 240.20[5]), was jurisdictionally defective, since it failed to allege "the essential element of either intent or recklessness" (<i>People v Tarka</i>, 75 NY2d 996, 997 [1990]). Defendant's requisite intent to threaten public safety, peace or order, or recklessness in creating such a risk (<i>see People v Baker</i>, 20 NY3d 354, 359 [2013]; <i>People v Weaver</i>, 16 NY3d 123, 128 [2011]), is not fairly inferable from police allegations that defendant was "sitting on a stoop in front of the entrance" to a specified "residential building" and that this "behavior created a public inconvenience in that .... approximately five (5) other tenants of the building [] were forced to walk around the defendants in order to gain entry into the building." At most, the pleaded allegations showed that defendant caused momentary inconvenience to a few tenants, which is not sufficient to satisfy the requisite public harm element of the disorderly conduct statute (<i>see People v Jones, </i>9 NY3d 259, 262 [2007] ["Something more than a mere inconvenience of pedestrians is required to support the charge"]).</p><p>All concur.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br><br>Clerk of the Court<br>Decision Date: June 5, 2020<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 116 (Thursday, June 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14329]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,396]


Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Sauget, IL; Notice of Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated February 11, 2009, the United Steelworkers 
International Union (USW), District 7 requested administrative 
reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' 
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on 
January 14, 2009. The Notice of Determination was published in the 
Federal Register on February 2, 2009 (74 FR 5871).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of copper tubing did not contribute 
importantly to worker separations at the subject firm and no shift of 
production to a foreign source occurred.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided 
additional information regarding imports of copper tubing and alleged 
that the customers might have increased imports of copper tubing in the 
relevant period.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of June 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-14329 Filed 6-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

**MPHASE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of mPhase Technologies, Inc., a NewJersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended September30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),I, Ronald A. Durando, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section1350), thatto his knowledge: 

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronald A. Durando__________________Ronald A. Durando Chief Executive Officer 

November 15, 2004 

----
Exhibit 99.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Kelly Tucek, the Chief Financial Officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/S/____________________________________

Name: Kelly Tucek

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 2, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 337 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 337

   To prohibit the importation of ruminants and swine, and fresh and 
 frozen meat and products of ruminants and swine, from Argentina until 
the Secretary of Agriculture certifies to Congress that every region of 
    Argentina is free of foot and mouth disease without vaccination.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 2009

    Mr. Johnson (for himself, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Tester, Mr. Thune, Mrs. 
 McCaskill, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. Barrasso, and Mr. 
    Conrad) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the importation of ruminants and swine, and fresh and 
 frozen meat and products of ruminants and swine, from Argentina until 
the Secretary of Agriculture certifies to Congress that every region of 
    Argentina is free of foot and mouth disease without vaccination.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Foot and Mouth Disease Prevention 
Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF ARGENTINE RUMINANTS AND SWINE 
              UNTIL ARGENTINA IS FREE OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE WITHOUT 
              VACCINATION.

    The Secretary of Agriculture shall prohibit the importation into 
the United States of any ruminant or swine, or any fresh (including 
chilled or frozen) meat or fresh (including chilled or frozen) product 
of any ruminant or swine, that is born, raised, or slaughtered in 
Argentina until the Secretary certifies to Congress that every region 
of Argentina is free of foot and mouth disease without vaccination.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134923 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134923 

 COA: 277083 

Wayne CC: 90-012672 

90-012674 

CARL NEAL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

s1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 8, 2008 

Clerk
ITRONICS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                           COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
                  FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,1998 AND 1997

                                    EXHIBIT 11


                                         Three Months Ended March 31,  
                                         ----------------------------  
                                               1998        1997           
                                            ----------  ----------     
Common and common
 equivalent shares used in
 determining net loss per
 share

Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding
 during the period(1,000's)                   43,366      29,943        

Common equivalent shares                        -           -             
                                          ----------  ----------    

                                              43,366      29,943        
                                          ==========  ==========    


Net Income (loss)                         $ (204,249) $ (171,657)    

Cumulative preferred dividends
for the period                                  -        ( 9,880)      
                                          ----------  ----------    

Net income (loss) less
 cumulative preferred
 dividends for the period                 $ (204,249) $ (181,537)    
                                           =========   =========    

Earnings (Loss) per share                 $ ( 0.0047) $ ( 0.0061)    
                                           =========   =========    

                                      
                                      17


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                             187,618
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   187,843
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     187,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               21,917
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1,800
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          (9,335)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       187,843
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     2,112
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    12,216
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (10,104)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (10,104)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>