alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Arsen Sarkis Zartarian, Respondent.

[976 NYS2d 676]

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1991, was suspended by this Court’s order dated September 24, 2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts *(see*22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

*1222Peters, EJ., Rose, Lahtinen and Stein, JJ. concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s 1996 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            3553
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2298
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                         69
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6551
<PP&E>                                           53085
<DEPRECIATION>                                   30416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   30780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3187
<BONDS>                                          11100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           821
<OTHER-SE>                                       10582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     30780
<SALES>                                          13310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14180
<CGS>                                             5291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (54)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2108
<INCOME-TAX>                                       878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1230
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13445]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,565]


Chrysler Quality Engineering Center, Auburn Hills, MI; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 11, 2009, in response to a 
petition filed on behalf of workers at Chrysler Quality Engineering 
Center, Auburn Hills, Michigan.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of May 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13445 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,537
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,077
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 897,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          226,905
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           699
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   897,694
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               286,195
<CGS>                                          135,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  478,292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (136,709)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (136,709)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (136,709)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.04)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1025
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        173
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1236
<PP&E>                                            7072
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4153)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2742
<BONDS>                                              7
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         11276
<OTHER-SE>                                      (8957)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5069
<SALES>                                           1633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1633
<CGS>                                             1897
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2720)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>
FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 12/16/2015 1:57:46 PM PAM ESTES Clerk
Exhibit 32.1  Certification  Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:  (1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;  (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.P.  By:Inland Real Estate Investment CorporationGeneral PartnerBy:/S/ Brenda G. GujralName:Brenda G. GujralTitle:President of the General Partner andprincipal executive officer of Inland Land Appreciation Fund, L.PDate:November 6, 2006
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24.1



                                  POWER OF ATTORNEY


   
     KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each individual whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Myles M. Kranzler and Edward J.
Klinsport, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents
with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead in any
and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Base Ten Systems,
Inc. for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1996 and any amendments thereto, and
to file same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done to
comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1934, and all requirements
of the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof. 



                                        /S/ MYLES M. KRANZLER
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Myles M. Kranzler


                                        /S/ EDWARD J. KLINSPORT
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Edward J. Klinsport


                                        /S/ ALAN J. EISENBERG
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Alan J. Eisenberg


                                        /S/ ALEXANDER M. ADELSON
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Alexander M. Adelson


                                        /S/ ALAN S. POOLE
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Alan S. Poole


                                        /S/ SUSAN M. KLINSPORT
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Susan M. Klinsport

                                          43
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, No. 08

- 18

- 00 215

- CR

§

A ppellant, Appeal from the

§

V. 384th District Court

§

ALFRED CORRAL

, of El Paso County, Texas

§

A ppellee. (TC# 20170D02456 )

§

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The State of Texas has filed a motion to dismiss its appeal pursuant to Rule 42.2 (a) . This

rule permits an appellate court to dismiss a criminal appeal on the appellant's moti on at any time

before the court’ s decision. T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.2(a). We grant the motion and dismiss the State’s

appeal.

February 5 , 2019

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
95-397.

#### St. Marys Foundry Co. v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 93APD11-1515. On request for oral argument. Request denied.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                    122479
<RECEIVABLES>                                   375000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          186137
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (69572)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2534540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3446414
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       8579136
<OTHER-SE>                                   (9491010)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2534540
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4339832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               20900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (4360732)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (4360732)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (4360732)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.291)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.192)


</TABLE>
### FOR PUBLICATION


### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  T HOMAS P AUL W EST ; G REGORY D ICKENS ; C HARLES M. H EDLUND ; R OBERT W. M URRAY ; T HEODORE W ASHINGTON ; T ODD S MITH , No. 11-16707

Plaintiffs-Appellants,
D.C. No. v. 2:11-cv-01409- J ANICE K B REWER , Governor of NVW



#  Arizona; C HARLES L. R YAN , District of Arizona, Director, Arizona Department of Phoenix Corrections; E RNEST T RUJILLO ; C ARSON M C W ILLIAMS , Warden, ORDER Arizona Department of Corrections- Florence; U NKNOWN P ARTIES , named as Does 1-50,

Defendants-Appellees. 

# 

Filed July 18, 2011

Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Thomas Paul West’s petition for panel rehearing is DENIED

.

9449
***NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION***

***MICS CLASS II - AUDIT CHECKLIST***

***BINGO (BI)***

Page 8 of 24
RUBEN J. MARTINEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-5662

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 4, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

James B. Fensom, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Courtenay H. Miller, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lauren L. Brudnicki, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DONAVON RAY NICHOLS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior

District Judge. (CR-94-21, CA-96-41-3)

Submitted: January 9, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donavon Ray Nichols, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Farrell,

Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), as amended by Antiterrorism

and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110

Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Nichols, Nos. CR-94-21; CA-96-41-3 (S.D.W. Va. May

20, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel

and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NWCG Fire Training and Incident Qualifications

Employee Name:

IFPM Position: Engine Module Supervisor

NWCG Incident Management Qualifications:

Primary Core Requirement: Engine Boss (ENGB) 

Secondary Core Requirement: Incident Commander, Type 4 (ICT4) 

The purpose of this form is to help identify required and developmental training for the 

NWCG Incident Management Qualification Standards for this position.  The required 

training includes the IFPM “Additional Required Training” and the required training for 

the Incident Command Positions (ICS) and/or the Wildland Fire Positions based on the 

2009 Wildland Fire Qualification System Guide (PMS 310‐1).  Employees should refer

to individual agency requirements.

Course

Number

Course Name Training  

Needed

Training

Completed

Estimated

Cost

Required Training     

S‐230  Crew Boss (Single Resource)       

S‐290  Intermediate Wildland Fire Behavior       

Suggested Developmental Training     

S‐211  Portable Pumps and Water Use       

S‐212  Wildfire Power Saws       

S‐215  Fire Operations in the Urban 

Interface 

    

S‐231  Engine Boss (Single Resource)       

S‐234  Ignition Operations       

S‐260  Interagency Incident Business 

Management 

    

S‐270  Basic Air Operations       

L‐280  Followership to Leadership       

ICS‐200  Basic ICS: ICS for Single Resources 

and Initial Action Incidents
#### Jackson & Nash LLP, Appellant, v E. Timothy McAuliffe PLLC et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Decided March 31, 2011

*825Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action with the meaning of the Constitution.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nicole Sanfo, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 474]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Burton Hecht, J., at plea and sentence in absentia; John N. Byrne, J., at execution of sentence), rendered on or about August 27,1993, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Williams, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
94-2669.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Manogg.

IT IS ORDERED by this court, *sua sponte,*effective May 7, 1997, that Philip M. Manogg, a.k.a. Philip Martin Manogg, Attorney Registration No. 0025402, last known address in Newark, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of January 10, 1996, to wit: failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before February 9, 1996, and failure to pay board costs on or before April 9,1996.
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Boyd E. Hoback, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of Good Times Restaurants Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

 

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)     All significant deficiencies inthe design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

 

*/s/ Boyd E. Hoback*

Boyd E. Hoback

*President and ChiefExecutive Officer*

February 14, 2008

----