alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.10


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2


TO


PENNY AUCTION SOLUTIONS, INC.


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


April 18, 2013


 


WHEREAS, on February
9, 2012, Penny Auction Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), issued an unsecured promissory note,
as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to Promissory Note dated December 10, 2012 (the “Note”), pursuant to which
it promised to pay to the order of Kodiak Capital Group, LLC (the “Holder”), the principal amount of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND
DOLLARS ($500,000), together with interest incurred thereon, as therein provided;


 


WHEREAS, the Note provided
that, all principal and interest accrued and unpaid thereunder shall become due on March 31 2013 (the “Maturity Date”);


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Holder have determined that it is advisable and in their best interests to amend the Note to extend the Maturity Date to
March 31, 2014;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged,
and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Company and the Holder hereby agree as follows:


 


1.Each of the first
paragraph of the Note and Section 2(a) of the Note is hereby amended by deleting “March 31, 2013” and inserting “March
31, 2014” in lieu thereof.


 


2.This Amendment
No. 1 may be executed and delivered (including by facsimile transmission) in any number of counterparts, and by the different parties
hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken
together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Except to the extent necessary to implement the change set forth above, the
Note shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. This Amendment No. 1 shall be construed and enforced in accordance with,
and the rights of the parties shall be governed by, the laws of the State of Nevada, without giving effect to the conflict of law
provisions thereof.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Company and the Holder have caused this Amendment No. 2 to be signed on the date first set forth above.


 


	 	PENNY AUCTION SOLUTIONS, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Michael Holt 	 
	 	 	Michael Holt, President	 
	 	 	 	 


 


	 	KODIAK CAPITAL GROUP, LLC	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Ryan Hodson	 
	 	 	Ryan Hodson
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3481 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3481

  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify Federal 
                responsibility for stormwater pollution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 2010

  Mr. Cardin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify Federal 
                responsibility for stormwater pollution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION.

    Section 313 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
1323) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Federal Responsibility for Stormwater Pollution.--Reasonable 
service charges described in subsection (a) include reasonable fees or 
assessments made for the purpose of stormwater management in the same 
manner and to the same extent as any nongovernmental entity.
    ``(d) No Treatment as Tax or Levy.--A fee or assessment described 
in this section--
            ``(1) shall not be considered to be a tax or other levy 
        subject to an assertion of sovereign immunity; and
            ``(2) may be paid using appropriated funds.''.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 205 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 

in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2019 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Small Business in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 

4 (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $6,738,000 for the One Hundred Sixteenth 

9 Congress. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 205 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $3,369,000 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2019, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2020; and 

7 (2) not more than $3,369,000 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2020, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2021. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Carl R., Respondent. Gerald G. Wright, Appellant.

Submitted April 29, 2013;

decided June 11, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-D  ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 12th day of August, 2005.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-D
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-D and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-D and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8091

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD GRAVELY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-82) Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 25, 2002 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Gravely, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Richard Gravely appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his coram nobis petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Gravely , No. CR-94-82 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 23A

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52405) pertaining to the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 1993 Long Term Incentive Plan,
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52407) pertaining to the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 1993 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors,
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-60327) pertaining to the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 1997 Employee Stock Plan, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-43188) pertaining to the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 2000 Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Bassett Furniture
Industries, Incorporated 1997 Employee Stock Plan, and the Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated 1993 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated February 6, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Bassett Furniture Industries, Incorporated and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Bassett
Furniture Industries, Incorporated, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended November 24, 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina

February 6, 2008
Exhibit 32(c)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Frank O. Heintz, President and Chief Executive Officer of Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:



|/s/FRANK O. HEINTZ                                    |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Frank O. Heintz
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 

Date:
March 9, 2004

144

---

QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1180

THOMAS WILLIAM JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SPRINT INTERNATIONAL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District

Judge. (CA-95-1017-A)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas William Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Michels, Jr.,

MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting the

employer's motion for summary judgment in this Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) claim under 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12117 (West

1995). After a hearing, the district court granted Appellee's

motion for summary judgment. Jones v. Sprint International, No. CA95-1017-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 1996).

Notwithstanding his employer's reasonable accommodations, the

record reveals that Appellant failed to perform his job as legitimately expected due to his excessive absenteeism. The record is

uncontroverted that Appellant's attendance was a necessary component of his job and that although Appellant was given several

opportunities to remedy his unacceptable attendance, he failed to

do so. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's grant of summary

judgment to the Appellee employer finding that Appellant failed to

establish a prima facie case of discrimination. See Ennis v.

National Ass'n of Business & Educ. Radio, Inc., 53 F.3d 55, 57-58

(4th Cir. 1995) (holding that the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,

411 U.S. 792 (1973), scheme used in Title VII cases applies to ADA

claims; to establish a prima facie case of discrimination, a plaintiff must show at the time of discharge he was performing his job

at a level that met his employer's legitimate expectations).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 199 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, 

and Technology in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2019 

Ms. JOHNSON of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Science, Space, and Technology in the One Hundred 

Sixteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Science, Space, 

4 and Technology (hereafter in this resolution referred to 

5 as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff 

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $11,533,400 for the One 

9 Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 199 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $5,766,700 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2019, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2020; and 

7 (2) not more than $5,766,700 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2020, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2021. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14182]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOREIGN CLAIMS SETTLEMENT COMMISSION

[F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 3-09]


Meetings; Sunshine Act

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR Part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
meetings for the transaction of Commission business and other matters 
specified, as follows:
    Date and Time: Thursday, June 25, 2009, at 10:30 a.m.
    Subject Matter: Issuance of Proposed Decisions, Amended Proposed 
Decisions and Orders in claims against Albania.
    Status: Open.
    All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance 
notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: 
Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E 
Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-
6975.

Mauricio J. Tamargo,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. E9-14182 Filed 6-12-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

                    The notice “                    *Draft Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections 2008,”*                     was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 3rd, 2009, (Vol. 74 FR No. 105).                           ( print page 27805)                        This notice is corrected as follows: On page 26704 first column, under                     **SUMMARY**                    , the Web site should read:                     *http://wwwn.cdc.gov/​publiccomments/​.*

Dated: June 4, 2009.

James D. Seligman,

Chief Information Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-13694 Filed 6-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 18, 2020

No. 04-20-00463-CR

Michael Lee HERNDON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR13361

The Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court clerk has forwarded the appellant’s notice of appeal and the 

trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(e). 

The certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. We 

therefore ORDER the trial court clerk to file, by September 28, 2020 a clerk’s 

record containing the following documents:

1. All pre-trial motions and the orders on those motions, if 

any;

2. all documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain, 

including the court’s admonishments, the defendant’s 

waiver and consent to stipulation of testimony, and any 

other stipulations;

3. the judgment;

4. all post-judgment motions and the orders on those motions, 

if any;

5. the notice(s) of appeal;

6. the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal; 

7. the criminal docket sheet; and

8. the bill of costs.

After the clerk’s record has been filed, this court will review the 

certification to determine whether it is defective. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 

610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding court of appeals must review clerk’s record 

to determine whether the certification is defective). 
We further ORDER that appellant is hereby notified that if the clerk’s 

record or a supplemental clerk’s record filed with this court does not contain a 

certification or amended certification showing appellant has the right of appeal, 

and if the trial court’s certification is not defective, this appeal will be dismissed

within 30 days of this order unless appellant shows cause why this appeal 

should not be dismissed. See id. R. 25.2(d), (f) (requiring “dismiss[al] if a 

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made 

part of the record” and providing an amended certification may be filed in the 

appellate court under Rule 37.1 or any time before the appellant’s brief is filed).

We further ORDER that all other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further 

order of this court. We also ORDER the clerk of this court to send a copy of this order to the 

attorneys of record, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the 

reporter’s record in this appeal.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of September, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court