alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-D  ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 14th day of August, 2006.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-D
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-D and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-D and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                   EXHIBIT 12
 
                         AVCO FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
 
                  STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NUMBER OF TIMES
                              FIXED CHARGES EARNED
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Year ended December 31,
                                              -----------------------------------------------------
                                                1995       1994       1993       1992       1991
                                              ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
<S>                                           <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
                                                             (Thousands of dollars)
Income
  Income before income taxes and cumulative
     effect of changes in accounting
     principles                               $ 287,459  $ 259,110  $ 225,784  $ 203,913  $ 196,886
                                              ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
  Fixed charges to be added back to
     income --
     Interest and debt expense                  455,379    334,084    324,211    370,884    395,703
     Rentals (one-third of all rent and
       related costs charged to income)          14,905     13,942     14,378     15,460     14,915
                                              ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
          Total fixed charges                   470,284    348,026    338,589    386,344    410,618
                                              ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Income before income taxes, cumulative
  effect of changes in accounting principles
  and fixed charges                           $ 757,743  $ 607,136  $ 564,373  $ 590,257  $ 607,504
                                               ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Ratio
  Number of times fixed charges covered by
     income before income taxes, cumulative
     effect of changes in accounting
     principles, and fixed charges               1.6        1.7        1.7        1.5        1.5
                                                 ---        ---        ---        ---        ---
                                                 ---        ---        ---        ---        ---
</TABLE>
 
                                       S-3
S. 3481 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify Federal responsibility 

for stormwater pollution. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FEDERAL RESPONSIBILITY TO PAY FOR STORMWATER 

PROGRAMS. 

Section 313 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 

U.S.C. 1323) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(c) REASONABLE SERVICE CHARGES.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For the purposes of this Act, reasonable 

service charges described in subsection (a) include any reasonable nondiscriminatory fee, charge, or assessment that is— 

‘‘(A) based on some fair approximation of the proportionate contribution of the property or facility to 

stormwater pollution (in terms of quantities of pollutants, 

or volume or rate of stormwater discharge or runoff from 

the property or facility); and 

‘‘(B) used to pay or reimburse the costs associated 

with any stormwater management program (whether associated with a separate storm sewer system or a sewer 

system that manages a combination of stormwater and 

sanitary waste), including the full range of programmatic 

and structural costs attributable to collecting stormwater, 

reducing pollutants in stormwater, and reducing the 

volume and rate of stormwater discharge, regardless of 

whether that reasonable fee, charge, or assessment is 

denominated a tax. 

‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON ACCOUNTS.— 

‘‘(A) LIMITATION.—The payment or reimbursement of 

any fee, charge, or assessment described in paragraph (1) 

shall not be made using funds from any permanent 

authorization account in the Treasury. 

‘‘(B) REIMBURSEMENT OR PAYMENT OBLIGATION OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.—Each department, agency, or 

instrumentality of the executive, legislative, and judicial 

branches of the Federal Government, as described in subsection (a), shall not be obligated to pay or reimburse 

any fee, charge, or assessment described in paragraph (1), 

except to the extent and in an amount provided in advance 
S. 3481—2 

by any appropriations Act to pay or reimburse the fee, 

charge, or assessment.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
6

FY16-FY17 Gaming Revenues by Region

Number of Gaming Number of Gaming Number of Gaming Revenue

Submissions Revenues Submissions Revenues Submissions Revenues Percentage

Portland 52 $3,383,829 53 $3,177,311 (1) $206,518 6.5%

Sacramento 74 $8,996,042 70 $8,380,918 4 $615,124 7.3%

Phoenix 59 $3,037,879 57 $2,932,157 2 $105,722 3.6%

St. Paul 92 $4,586,695 93 $4,511,156 (1) $75,539 1.7%

Rapid City 39 $363,257 39 $373,179 0 ($9,922) (2.7%)

Tulsa 72 $2,391,294 69 $2,295,202 3 $96,092 4.2%

OK City 69 $2,311,621 66 $2,264,665 3 $46,955 2.1%

Washington DC 37 $7,333,311 37 $7,260,962 0 $72,350 1.0%

Totals 494 $32,403,927 484 $31,195,549 10 $1,208,378 3.9%

Portland Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.

Sacramento California, and Northern Nevada.

Phoenix Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Southern Nevada.

St. Paul Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska and Wisconsin.

Rapid City North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana and Wyoming.

Tulsa Kansas, and Eastern Oklahoma.

OK City Western Oklahoma and Texas.

Washington DC Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and New York.

Source: Compiled from gaming operation audited financial statements received by the NIGC through June 26, 2018.

National Indian Gaming Commission

Tribal Gaming Revenues (in thousands) by Region

Fiscal Year 2017 and 2016

Fiscal Year 2017 Fiscal Year 2016 Increase (decrease)
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael D. Dale, Chief Executive Officer of ATS Medical, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September
30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 8, 2006


/s/ Michael D. Dale
-------------------------------------
Name: Michael D. Dale
Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                       32
EXHIBIT 32.2
------------


                      SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James M. O'Connell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

i.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
     of the Company.


                      /s/  James M. O'Connell
                      ------------------------------
                      Chief Financial Officer


February 11, 2004




[Signed originals of these written statements required by Section 906 have
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. ]
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3609 

To extend the temporary authority for the performance of medical disability 

examinations by contract physicians for the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2010 

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary authority for the performance of 

medical disability examinations by contract physicians 

for the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR PERFORM4 ANCE OF MEDICAL DISABILITY EXAMINA5 TIONS BY CONTRACT PHYSICIANS. 

6 Section 704(c) of the Veterans Benefits Act of 2003 

7 (Public Law 108–183; 38 U.S.C. 5101 note) is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘December 31, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘Decem9 ber 31, 2012’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
[993 NE2d 409, 970 NYS2d 923]

#### Mia Plaza, an Infant by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Claribel Rodriguez, Appellant, v New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (Jacobi Medical Center), Respondent.

Decided June 26, 2013

*984APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Law Offices of Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, EC.,*Yonkers *(John M. Daly*of counsel), for appellant.

*Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel,*New York City *(Janet*L. Zaleon of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The certified question should not be answered on the ground that it is unnecessary.

Plaintiff admittedly served a late notice of claim against defendant without seeking leave of court.

General Municipal Law § 50-e (1) requires that a claimant serve a notice of claim against a public corporation within 90 days after a tort claim arises. However, section 50-e (5) provides that a court, “in its discretion,” may grant an application extending the time to serve a notice of claim as long as the application is made within the limitations period for commencing the action, including any tolls or extensions. CPLR 208 provides that “[i]f a person entitled to commence an action is under a disability because of infancy ... at the time the cause of action accrues, and . . . the time otherwise limited [for commencing the action] is less than three years, the time shall be extended by the period of disability.” Where a medical malpractice action accrues during infancy, the extension is limited to 10 years from the time of accrual *(see*CPLR 208).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary, in a memorandum.
96-2247.

#### State ex rel. The Plain Dealer v. Ohio Dept. of Ins.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of the joint motion to extend time for oral argument currently scheduled for May 20,1997,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to extend time for oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, to the extent that oral argument is extended to twenty minutes per side.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11


                        MEDICORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    Year Ended December 31,
                                                                          -----------------------------------------
                                                                              1996           1995           1994
                                                                              ----           ----           ----

<S>                                                                       <C>            <C>            <C>
PRIMARY



Weighted average common shares outstanding                                  5,456,255      5,454,940      5,120,913

Net effect of dilutive stock options - based on the
  modified treasury stock method for 1996 and 1995 and
  the treasury stock method for 1994                                          574,749        474,275        193,348
                                                                          -----------    -----------    -----------
                                                                            6,031,004      5,929,215      5,314,261
                                                                          -----------    -----------    -----------

Net income                                                                $ 2,417,269    $ 2,251,271    $   864,108
                                                                          ===========    ===========    ===========


Net income per share                                                         $ .40          $ .38          $ .16
                                                                              ====           ====           ====

FULLY DILUTED

Weighted average common shares outstanding                                  5,456,255      5,454,940

Net effect of dilutive stock options - based on the
  modified treasury stock method using ending market price                    683,048        505,155
                                                                          -----------    -----------
                                                                            6,139,303      5,960,095
                                                                          ===========    ===========

Net income                                                                $ 2,417,269    $ 2,251,217
                                                                          ===========    ===========


Net income per share                                                         $ .39          $ .38
                                                                              ====           ====
</TABLE>



Note:  Fully diluted earnings per common share were the same as primary
earnings per common share and are not presented for 1994.
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-C  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 8th day of January, 2003.

                                   GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                   PARTNERSHIP II-C
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                          80960
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2697
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     11856
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                96365
<PP&E>                          304185
<DEPRECIATION>                  96520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  304155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           16306
<BONDS>                         31
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        3
<OTHER-SE>                      244761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    304155
<SALES>                         10803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                10803
<CGS>                           15033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   15033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                484
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (4906)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (4906)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (4906)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
United States Department of the Interior 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

Washington, D.C. 20240 

The Honorable Mike Thompson 

House of Representatives -J 

Washington, D.C. 205 15 : 

7 

<% -.., -_ L 

23 

Dear Mr. Thompson: - ,. 

__ , -_ rk -.- % e ,. "3 :-* * 

-. Thank you for your letter of December 10,2002, regarding the status of land on which the ~*ree& . 

Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians operates a Class III gaming establishment known as the Riva ROG~ 

Casino. We apologize for our failure to respond to your earlier letters of last summer. We a@ re&; 

any misunderstanding your office may have experienced with the Bureau of Indian Affairs CongrerssiSal 

Affairs staff. 

The Dry Creek Rancheria lands, consisting of 75 acres in Sonoma County, California, are owned in fee 

by the United States for the Band's beneficial use. Enclosed is'a letter dated March 29,2002, fiom The 

Superintendent, Central California Agency, to the Chairperson, Dry Creek Rancheria, regarding the 

status of the Rancheria lands. We concur with the Superintendent's determination. Our views regarding 

this matter recently have been upheld by the U.S. District court for the Northern District of California 

in Proschold v. United States, No. C 01-2390 SBA (August 13,2002). 

In addition, we believe that the Dry Creek Rancheria lands are within the definition of the term "Indian 

lands" as defined in 25 U.S.C. 2703(4) because they are both within the limits of the Band's reservation 

and are held in trust for the benefit of the Band. Finally, the Band has negotiated a Class III gaming 

compact with the State of California, and this compact has been approved by the Secretary of the 

Interior, and notice of its approval published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on May 1 6,2000, as required 

by 25 U.S.C. 271 0(d)(3)(B). 

It is within the Bureau of Indian Affairs authority to determine the status of lands within its jurisdiction 

and to determine whether any such lands are within the boundaries of an Indian reservation. If you have 

any additional questions regarding this matter, please call me at (202) 208-7163. 

Thank you for your interest in Indian gaming matters. 

Sincerely, 

lsgdl Aurene M. Martin 

Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs 

Enclosure 

cc: Regional Director, Pacific Region 

Superintendent, Central California Agency 

Acting General Counsel, National Indian Gaming Commission
# NIGC Documents