alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED MARCH 29, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                         JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                                      33,729
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            64,074
<PP&E>                                                       2,712
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 541
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              66,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      924,790
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                  2,394
<COMMON>                                                     9,325
<OTHER-SE>                                                (869,723)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                66,786
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 0
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          17,829
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (316,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            (316,320)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (316,320)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (.03)
        


</TABLE>
#### BREWER et al. v. HASSETT, Collector of Internal Revenue.

Civil Action No. 1017.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Feb. 4, 1942.

*223W. A. Barrows, Palmer, Dodge, Barstow, Wilkins & Davis, and E. L. Twomey, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.

Edmund J. Brandon, U. S. Atty., and George F. Garrity, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

FORD, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on a motion by the plaintiffs, in accordance with Rule 37(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to compel Sidney H. Litner, an Internal Revenue Agent, to answer questions on deposition. The questions asked concern statements made by the plaintiff Brewer to Litner. Litner objects to answering on the ground that the testimony is irrelevant and incompetent, and also on the ground that he received the statements while acting in his official capacity and the regulations of the Treasury Department forbid its disclosure.

By Rule 26(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “the deponent may be examined regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action, whether relating to the claim or defense of the examining party or to the claim or defense of any other party”. Under this provision it seems proper to require the witness to answer the questions. The answers sought would no doubt form part of the defendant’s case, since they would be admissions by a party-opponent and may be used by the defendant in direct or cross-examination.

In numerous decided cases, plaintiffs who had given a statement to agents of the defendants’ insurers have been allowed to inquire into its contents by deposition. Price v. Levitt, D.C., 29 F.Supp. 164; Kulich v. Murray, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 675; Bough v. Lee, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 673; and Colpak v. Hetterick, D.C., 40 F.Supp. 350. The analogy to the testimony sought in the instant case is clear.

 The questions therefore must be answered unless some privilege protects the answers from disclosure. I see no merit in defendant’s claim that such a privilege protects all information gained by Internal Revenue Agents in their official capacity. The plaintiffs are not seeking for use in private litigation the files, records, or documents whose production might be prohibited by regulations or statute. Cf. Boske v. Comingore, 177 U.S. 459, 20 S.Ct. 701, 44 L.Ed. 846. They want to know the content of statements the existence of which they know about and which, in all probability, will be used by the defendant at the trial. The privilege from disclosure accorded to official documents is granted because public policy requires secrecy of the proceedings of certain branches of government, that these branches may better serve the public interest. There are no such considerations here where the Collector is a party to the suit. Cf. Fleming v. Bernardi, D.C., 1 F.R.D. 624.

The motion is allowed.
EXHIBIT 23.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-52065; No. 333-74255 and No. 333-87786) and on
Form S-3 (No. 333-92388 and 333-117534) of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. of our report
dated December 12, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements,
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders and which is incorporated in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Houston, Texas
December 13, 2006
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3502 

To restore Americans’ individual liberty by striking the Federal mandate 

to purchase insurance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2010 

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To restore Americans’ individual liberty by striking the 

Federal mandate to purchase insurance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Liberty Res5 toration Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESTORING INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY. 

7 Sections 1501 and 1502 and subsections (a), (b), (c), 

8 and (d) of section 10106 of the Patient Protection and 

9 Affordable Care Act (and the amendments made by such 

10 sections and subsections) are repealed and the Internal 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3502 IS

1 Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered 

2 as if such provisions and amendments had never been en3 acted. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.1

ITRONICS INC.

Certificationof Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act

 

 

CERTIFICATION

I, John W. Whitney, President of ITRONICS INC., certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ITRONICSINC.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer andhave:

> 
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls    and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this    report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period    covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control    over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent    fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,    the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

35

----

> 
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of    internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect    the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial    information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who    have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial    reporting.

 

 

Date: May 14, 2007                         /S/JOHN W. WHITNEY
                                           JohnW. Whitney

                                           President

36
NUMBERS

13-15-00218-CV

13-15-00237-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

CITY OF PORT ISABEL, TEXAS, Appellants,

MARIA DE JESUS GARZA, 

GUILLERMO TORRES AND JOE E. VEGA,

v.

JUAN JOSE “JJ” ZAMORA, SR. 

AND MARTIN C. CANTU, Appellees.

On appeal from the 444th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Garza, Benavides and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

Appellants, the City of Port Isabel, Texas, Maria de Jesus Garza, Guillermo Torres 

and Joe E. Vega, have perfected two appeals of orders rendered in trial court cause 
2

number 2015-DCL-2342-H. Attorney Humberto Silva, purporting to represent appellants, 

has filed a “Motion to Show Authority to Act” in which he requests that we abate the 

appeals and remand to the trial court for determination as to whether attorneys Robert L. 

Colllins, Audrey Guthrie and Christopher D. Lewis have authority to bring these appeals

on behalf of appellants. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 12.

Having reviewed the motion, we hereby ORDER that Robert L. Colllins, Audrey 

Guthrie and Christopher D. Lewis file any response to the motion with this Court on or 

before Thursday, July 2, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

25th day of June, 2015.
EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Peak Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified
(the "Report"), the undersigned, Wilfred Shorrocks, as Chief Executive Officer
and as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Wilfred Shorrocks
-------------------------------------------------------
Wilfred Shorrocks
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Date:  November 21, 2003
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

TEXCHEM ADVANCED PRO DUCTS INCORPORATED SDN. BH D., Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

E.PAK INTERNATIONAL INC ., Defendant

- Appellant

______________________

2015

- 1355

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 5:12

- cv

- 01341

- JGB

SP, Judge Jesus G. Bernal.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K ENT M. W ALKER , Lewis Kohn & Fitzwilliam LLP, San Diego, CA, argued for plaintiff -appellee.

S TEVEN C. S USSER , Carlson, Gaskey & Olds, P.C., Birmingham, MI, argued for defendant

- appellant. Also represented by D AVID J. G ASKEY

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (T ARANTO , P LAGER , and L INN , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

November 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income  Partners  1987-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement  of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1,723
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               289,360
<PP&E>                                         24,834,756
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (20,824,715)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,299,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          218,713
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,864,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,299,401
<SALES>                                        888,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               900,664
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  900,415<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (147,811)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (147,811)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (147,811)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6935

GRAHAM SCHIFF,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (1:22-cv-03332-TDC)

Submitted: October 19, 2023 Decided: December 19, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Graham Harry Schiff, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6935 Doc: 5 Filed: 12/19/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Graham Harry Schiff seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion 

to stay adjudication of a pending 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, concluding his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2241 petition was duplicative, granting a motion to seal filed by Respondent, and ruling 

on various nondispositive motions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). 

The order Schiff seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6935 Doc: 5 Filed: 12/19/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 21
Subsidiaries of Arvin Industries, Inc.

Set forth below are the names of certain subsidiaries, at least
50% owned, directly or indirectly, of the Company included in the
consolidated financial statements of the Company and its
subsidiaries in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 28, 1997.  Certain subsidiaries, which when
considered in the aggregate would not constitute a significant
subsidiary, are omitted from the list below.


                                             State or Other
                                             Jurisdiction of
Company Name                                 Incorporation
-------------                                ---------------
Maremont Corporation                         Delaware
Maremont Exhaust Products, Inc.              Delaware
Gabriel Europe, Inc.                         Delaware
Gabriel Ride Control Products, Inc.          Delaware
Roll Coater, Inc.                            Indiana
Arvin International Holdings, Inc.           Delaware
AVM, Inc.                                    South Carolina
Arvin Automotive of Canada                   Canada
Arvin Ride Control Products, Inc.            Canada
Arvin Finance Company of Canada              Canada
Arvin Canada Holding, Ltd.                   Canada
Way Assauto S.r.l.                           Italy
Autocomponents Suspension S.r.l.             Italy
ANSA Marmitte S.p.A.                         Italy
Arvin de Mexico S.A. de C.V.                 Mexico
Arvin-Exhaust B.V.                           The Netherlands
Arvin International Holland B.V.             The Netherlands
Timax Exhaust Systems Holding                The Netherlands
Arvin RCI B.V.                               The Netherlands
Arvin-Exhaust S.A.                           Spain
A. P. Amortiguadores, S.A.                   Spain
Arvin France S.A.                            France
Financiere ROSI S.A.                         France
Arvin International U.K., Ltd.               United Kingdom
Arvin Exhaust Ltd.                           United Kingdom
Arvin Investment U.K., Ltd.                  United Kingdom
Timax U.K., Ltd.                             United Kingdom
Gabriel S. A. Pty. Ltd.                      South Africa
97-628.

#### State v. Perry.

Hamilton App. No. C-960297.

Resnick, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3118 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that monetary benefits 

paid to veterans by States and municipalities shall be excluded from 

consideration as income for purposes of pension benefits paid by the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2010 

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that 

monetary benefits paid to veterans by States and municipalities shall be excluded from consideration as income 

for purposes of pension benefits paid by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Veterans Pensions Protec5 tion Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3118 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS FROM CONSID2 ERATION AS INCOME FOR PURPOSES OF VET3 ERANS PENSION BENEFITS. 

4 (a) EXCLUSION.—Section 1503(a) of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

7 (10); 

8 (2) by redesignating paragraph (11) as para9 graph (12); and 

10 (3) by inserting after paragraph (10) the fol11 lowing new paragraph (11): 

12 ‘‘(11) payment of a monetary amount to a vet13 eran from a State or municipality that is paid as a 

14 veterans’ benefit; and’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to determinations 

17 of income for calendar years beginning after the date of 

18 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS