alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<LEGEND> THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CORPORATIONS FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

      <MULTIPLIER> 1

      <S>                           <C>
      <PERIOD-TYPE>                      QUARTER
      <FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC 31-1999
      <PERIOD-END>                 JUNE 30-2000
      <CASH>                             14,522
      <SECURITIES>                        2,000
      <RECEIVABLES>                           0
      <ALLOWANCES>                            0
      <INVENTORY>                     1,450,000
      <CURRENT ASSETS>                        0
      <PP&E>                                  0
      <DEPRECIATION>                          0
      <TOTAL ASSETS>                  1,466,522
      <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,116,717
      <BONDS>                                 0
      <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
      <PREFERRED>                             0
      <COMMON>                            2,404
      <OTHER-SE>                        347,401
      <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,466,522
      <SALES>                                 0
      <TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
      <CGS>                                   0
      <TOTAL COSTS>                           0
      <OTHER EXPENSES>                   24,930
     <LOSS PROVISION>                         0
      <INTEREST EXPENSE>                 43,200
      <INCOME PRETAX>                   (68,130)
      <INCOME-TAX>                            0
      <INCOME CONTINUING>                     0
      <DISCONTINUED>                          0
      <EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
      <CHANGES>                               0
      <NET-INCOME>                      (68,130)
      <EPS-BASIC>                       (.003)
      <EPS-DILUTED>                       (.003)
#### Cincinnati Bar Association *v.*Brown.

[Cite as *Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Brown*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 345.]

(No. 96-2372

Submitted February 19, 1997

Decided May 14, 1997.)

*347
      *James L. O’Connell*and *Kevin L. Swick,*for relator.

*Per Curiam.*

We concur with the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Order entered February 23 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 19 - 01388 - CV TARSHA HARDY, Appellant

V. COMMUNICATION WORKER S OF AMERICA, INC., CWA LOCAL 6215 AFL - CIO, COMMUNICATION W ORKERS OF AMERICA, A FL - CIO,

BONNIE MATHIAS, Appellee s On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 15 - 04027

ORDER I voluntarily recuse myself from hearing any matter in the above appea l.

/s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA

- KIPNESS JUSTICE
​

Exhibit 10.1
​
SUMMARY OF ANNUAL INCENTIVE BONUS PROGRAM
​
The Company maintains an unwritten annual incentive bonus program which provides for annual cash bonuses to designated senior managers, including all of our named executive officers, upon the achievement of performance goals established by the Board of Directors. The purpose of this program is to provide an incentive for achieving defined target performance goals based on our annual business and profit plan. The target performance goals typically include, but are not limited to, objectives regarding earnings, loan and deposit growth, credit quality, operating efficiency, strategic initiatives and regulatory examinations, and are established annually. Under this program, participants may earn an annual cash bonus up to a maximum of 150% of his or her target annual incentive award, or may earn no bonus at all if the Company’s actual performance is less than 75% of the target performance goal. The Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may increase or decrease the actual award earned by an executive under the program. Executives must be employed on the date of payment in order to receive payment of an earned award.

​
#### Christopher J. MCNAUGHTON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UDC HOMES INC., a Delaware Corporation; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-16322.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Filed June 20, 2006.

Christopher J. McNaughton, Scottsdale, AZ, pro se.

Juliet R. Peters, Esq., Office of the Attorney General, Solicitor General *&*Opinions Section, WM. Charles Thomson, Galla Her *&*Kennedy, P.A., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants — Appellees.

Before: WALLACE, KLEINFELD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Christopher J. McNaughton appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action which arise from the purchase of his property from UDC Homes (“UDC”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. *Rivera v. United States,*924 F.2d 948, 950 (9th Cir. 1991). We affirm.

McNaughton alleged that UDC conspired with the State of Arizona and the City of Phoenix to engage in “witness tampering” and deprive him of his constitutional rights. The district court properly dismissed McNaughton’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, because McNaughton does not allege any affirmative acts taken by the UDC in furtherance of a conspiracy, or any other act under color of law that deprived him of his rights. *See Barren v. Harrington,*152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order) (“A plaintiff must allege *741facts, not simply conclusions, that show that an individual was personally involved in the deprivation of his civil rights.”).

McNaughton’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
# I t 

# f:'!J**~ .~** 

### ......

### 2o~.

# ..**~** 

# ,**·~** 

# ·

# c· 

# L) uOc:- IJ**,~'~;~,** 

## Sr,.·r· 

## Pt-; I· ···•**»;"''~.•.P•.** 

### •/g : ..**:·~ ~**  ... , f I •. I I . I NO. 29,269 STATE OF TEXAS 

### § § 

### § 

### § IN THE DISTRiQT COURTr".:/':··f.J;., I 

# 0'••'1J••'•

........ 

# ..,,, ;'·;

... r_

... , . '· ...

" I 't·... 354TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT '/ i

### vs. REBEKAH THONGINH ROSS 

### § HUNT COUNTY, TEXAS NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE .JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Now comes REBEKAH THONG INH, Defendant in the above styled and numbered cause, and gives this written notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals of the State of Texas from the judgment ofconviction and sentence herein rendered against REBEKAH THONGINH ROSS.

Greenville, Texas 75404 Tel: (903) 513-0510 Fax: (903) 200-1359 E-Mail: jessicaedwardslaw@gmail.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that on October 13, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was served on the Hunt Cou istrict Attorney's Oftice by hand delivery. 

# I I 1 

# I
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
AVEMCO Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 33-
41930 and registration statement No. 33-22520 on Forms S-8 of AVEMCO Corporation
of our reports dated January 26, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of AVEMCO Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994,
and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1995, and all related schedules, which reports appear or are incorporated by
reference in the December 31, 1995, annual report on Form 10-K of AVEMCO
Corporation.  Our reports refer to a change in the method of accounting for
investments in fixed maturities and a change in the method of accounting for
income taxes.



                                     /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Washington, D.C.
March 22, 1996

                                      119
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,920,096
<SECURITIES>                                11,976,736
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,099,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 34,101,209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            58,479,993
<PP&E>                                       2,485,067
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,531,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,826,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,406,765
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       178,559
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,241,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,826,723
<SALES>                                      8,912,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,912,150
<CGS>                                        5,484,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,484,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,467,530
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,467,530
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,467,530
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Paulette Y. Ucci, Respondent, v David G. Ucci, Appellant.

Submitted May 7, 2012;

decided June 27, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-E ("Issuer") for the period
ending  March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 14th day of May, 2004.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-E
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-E and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-E and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

|   | EXHIBIT                32 |
|--------|---------------------------|

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the                Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and results of operations of                Gateway. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Ronald M.                DinerRonald                M. DinerPresidentRaymond                James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.(Managing                General Partner)February                14, 2008                                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| /s/                Jonathan                OorlogJonathan                OorlogVice                President and Chief Financial OfficerRaymond                James Tax Credit Funds, Inc.(Managing                General Partner)February                14, 2008 |
<PAGE> 70

                                  EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
dated April 28, 1983 on Form S-8 No. 2-72576 pertaining to the 1981 Stock
Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement dated March 29, 1990 on Form S-8 No.
33-34107 pertaining to the Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. Deferred Directors Fee Option
Plan, and the Registration Statement dated August 6, 1993 on Form S-8 No.
33-31316 pertaining to the Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. Employee Discounted Stock
Option Plan of our report dated February 21, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedules of Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. and
subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10K) for the year ended
December 31, 2002.



                                                        /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Indianapolis, Indiana
March 24, 2003
Exhibit 31(c)

BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY    CERTIFICATION

I,
Kenneth W. DeFontes, Jr., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Baltimore Gas and Electric Company;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 11, 2005

|
|

|/s/KENNETH W. DEFONTES, JR.           |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Applied Minerals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Christopher T. Carney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:   March 15, 2012
By:
/s/  CHRISTOPHER T. CARNEYChristopher T. CarneyChief Financial Officer
#### Khamvisay SIHABOUTH, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2006-7164.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 27, 2006.

Khamvisay Sihabouth, pro se.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LINN and DYK, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) and to dismiss Khamvisay Sihabouth’s appeal from the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ judgment in *Sihabouth v. Nicholson,*04-0232, — Fed. Appx. -, 2006 WL 510058, for lack of jurisdiction. Sihabouth has not responded.

Sihabouth appealed to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims from a 2004 Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) decision finding that Sihabouth was not a veteran eligible for benefits within the meaning of the law. Sihabouth asserted that he was a “Lt. Instructor Soldier Commando United States of America” in Laos several years before he immigrated to the United States, but that his “paperwork” had been stolen. BVA denied Sihabouth’s claim for benefits on the ground that his alleged service as a foreign soldier under the instruction of United States military personnel did not qualify him for veteran status. Sihabouth appealed to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, which affirmed the BVA decision. Sihabouth appealed to this court.

Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court has limited jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of the Veterans Court. *See Forshey v. Principi,*284 F.3d 1335, 1338 (Fed.Cir. 2002) (en banc). This court “may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case.” 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2).

Sihabouth’s appeal does not satisfy any of the grounds for invoking this court’s jurisdiction. In his informal brief, Sihabouth states only that he wants the court “to grant me the benefits of V.A.” Sihabouth makes no claim that the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims decision involved the validity or interpretation of a statute or regulation. He further maintains that no constitutional issues were decided in the decision on appeal. It appears that Sihabouth seeks review of the facts of his case and, at most, the application of the law to the facts of his case. In these circumstances, this court lacks jurisdiction to review Sihabouth’s appeal. *See*38 U.S.C. § 7292(d).

Accordingly,

*1007IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Secretary’s motion to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) is granted.

(2) The Secretary’s motion to dismiss is granted.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apogent Technologies Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank
H. Jellinek, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                        /s/ Frank H. Jellinek, Jr.
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Frank H. Jellinek, Jr.
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 13, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## Court of Appeals Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler



## B I L L O F C O S T S

Court of Appeals No. 12-13-00005-CV

Trial Court No. 2012-876-A

The Good Shepherd Hospital, Inc.

Vs.

Ronald Masten, et al

DOCUMENTS FILED AMOUNT FEE PAID BY Motion fee Motion fee Motion fee Motion fee Motion fee Motion fee Motion fee Reporter's record Clerk's record Filing Supreme Court chapter 51 fee Indigent $15.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $200.00 $855.00 $100.00 $50.00 $25.00 David W Dodge David W Dodge McCathern, PLLC McCathern, PLLC Ted B. Lyons & Associates McCathern Mooty McCathern Mooty McCathern Mooty Grinke David W. Dodge McCathern Mooty McCathern Mooty McCathern Mooty
TOTAL: $1,305.00

I, Pam Estes, Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler, Texas, certify that the above copy of the Bill of Costs is true and correct. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at Tyler, this 28th day of September 2015

, A.D.

PAM ESTES, CLERK

By:

_____________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk