alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CITY OF EDINBURG v. CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO.

Civ. A. No. 180.

District Court, S. D. Texas, Brownsville Division.

Jan. 12, 1943.

Oxford, Haigh'& Oxford, of Edinburg, Tex. and Culbertson, Morgan, Christopher & Bailey, of Fort Worth, Tex., for plaintiff.

Kemp, Lewright, Dyer, Wilson & Sorrell, of Corpus Christi, Tex., Looney & Clark, of Austin, Tex., and Strickland, Ewers, & Wilkins, of Mission, Tex., for defendant.

HANNAY, District Judge.

 This is a suit brought by the City of Edinburg, Texas, a municipal corporation, against the Central Power & Light Company, a Massachusetts corporation, seeking to recover penalties in the sum of $10.0 per day for alleged noncompliance with Articles 1121 and 1122 of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925. Both plaintiff and defendant filed motions herein, whereby each seeks to obtain a summary judgment in its respective favor. Considering the pleadings, affidavits on file and briefs submitted in this case, it is clear that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that, therefore, Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c applies. Based upon the pleadings, affidavits and briefs, the Court finds that at all times material to this suit, the defendant, Central Power & Light Company, was engaged in operating public utilities in more than one municipality, and that, therefore, said Articles 1121 and 1122 of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas do not apply to the defendant, Central Power & Light Company, and that said defendant was not legally required to make reports to the plaintiff. The City of Baird v. West Texas Utilities Co., decided by the Supreme Court of Texas, and reported in 136 Tex. 148, 148 S.W.2d 392, reads as follows: “We agree with the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals to the effect that Articles 1121 and 1122 apply only to public utilities operating in one municipality.”

Believing as this Court does that 'the question here involved has been directly, clearly and correctly decided by the Supreme Court of Texas as above set out, and that such decision is binding upon this Court, it is this Court’s opinion that the summary judgment sought by the plaintiff, City of Edinburg, should be and the same is hereby denied, and that the summary judgment prayed for by the defendant, Central Power & Light Company, should be *561and the same is hereby granted, and that this case is, therefore, dismissed, and that all the court costs herein incurred should be and the same are hereby adjudged against the plaintiff, City of Edinburg.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel. NCI-ARRA Competitive Revisions-Epidemiology, Prevention and Population Science.                    

*Date:*                         July 22, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Marriott Bethesda North Hotel and Conference Center, Bethesda, MD.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ilda M. Mckenna, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Research Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard,  Room 8111, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-496-7481.                         *mckennai@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 4, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-13679 Filed 6-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Amounts from the audited financial statements for Baldor Electric Company as of
January 3, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                            9575
<SECURITIES>                                     11900
<RECEIVABLES>                                    92265
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3525
<INVENTORY>                                      96541
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                219440
<PP&E>                                          227769
<DEPRECIATION>                                  123672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  355889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            78172
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3795
<OTHER-SE>                                      239639
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    355889
<SALES>                                         557940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                559783
<CGS>                                           389711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   494148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   509
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  65635
<INCOME-TAX>                                     25270
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     40365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.6
                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-F ("Issuer") for the period
ending  June 30, 2007  as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 20th day of August, 2007.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-F
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-F and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-F and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,507
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,481,826
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (13,507)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    (347)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (6)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

d1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

139096

ALISHA ANN RECKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 139096 COA: 284676 Grand Traverse CC: CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING, 07-025927-NI COMPANY, L.L.C., and MICHAEL ALAN WARNES, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 12, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the
case of McCormick v Carrier (Docket No. 136738) is pending on appeal before this
Court and that the decision in that case ma y resolve an issue ra ised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
<PAGE> 82
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G.
Patrick Corydon, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.



/s/ G. Patrick Corydon
-------------------------
G. Patrick Corydon
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
March 14, 2005
#### In the Matter of Charla R. Bikman (Admitted as Charla Ruth Bikman), a Suspended Attorney, Appellant. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Respondent.

Submitted June 11, 2012;

decided June 28, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT (21)
 
                                  SUBSIDIARIES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    PERCENTAGE OF VOTING SECURITIES
                                                      OWNED OR SUBJECT TO VOTING
                                                              CONTROL BY
                                                   ----------------------------------
                                                       COMPANY            OTHER
                                                   ----------------   ---------------
<S>                                                <C>                <C>
Shakespeare Company, a Delaware
 corporation..............................               100%
Subsidiaries of Shakespeare Company:
  Shakespeare (Hong Kong) Ltd., a Hong
   Kong corporation.......................                                 100%
  Pacific Rim Metallic Products Ltd., a
   Hong Kong corporation..................                                 100%
  Shakespeare (Aust) Pty. Ltd., an Austra-
   lian corporation.......................                                 100%
  Shakespeare Hengelsport, B.V., a Dutch
   corporation............................                                 100%
  Shakespeare International Ltd., a Brit-
   ish corporation........................                                 100%
  Subsidiaries of Shakespeare Interna-
   tional Ltd.:
    Shakespeare Company (UK) Ltd., a Brit-
     ish corporation......................                                 100%
    Shakespeare Monofilament U.K. Ltd., a
     British corporation..................                                 100%
Sitca Corporation, a Washington corpora-
 tion.....................................               100%
Subsidiaries of Sitca Corporation:
  K-2 Corporation, an Indiana corporation.                                 100%
  Subsidiaries of K-2 Corporation:
    Madshus A.S., a Norwegian corporation.                                 100%
    K-2 Ski Sport, und Mode, GmbH, a Ger-
     man corporation......................                                 100%
SMCA, Inc., a Minnesota corporation.......               100%
Subsidiary of SMCA, Inc.:
  Stearns Manufacturing Company, a Minne-
   sota corporation.......................                                 100%
Girvin Inc., a Delaware corporation.......               100%
Dana Design Ltd., a Montana corporation...               100%
</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

BARBARA JAN BOYD

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 12 DB 201 7 (No. 16 RST 2017)

Attorney Registration No. 46549

( Bucks County )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13 th day of March, 2017 , the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated March 2 , 2017 , is approved and it is ORDERED that

Barbara Jan Boyd

, who has been on Administrative Suspension

, has never been

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that s he has the moral qualifications,

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of th e

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 15 (Monday, January 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1398]



[[Page 4459]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of 
Civil Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Civil Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure will hold a 
two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not 
participation.

DATES: April 20-21, 2009.

Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Northwestern Law School, McCormick Building, 350 East 
Superior Street, Room 375, Chicago, IL 60611.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: January 5, 2009.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
 [FR Doc. E9-1398 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
#### Victor Y. Batshever, Appellant, v Daniel Black et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 11, 2012;

decided June 28, 2012

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*19 NY3d 830 (2012)].
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3435 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3435

 To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to revise the definition of 
    the term ``adulterated'' to include contamination with E. coli.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 27 (legislative day, May 26), 2010

Mrs. Gillibrand introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to revise the definition of 
    the term ``adulterated'' to include contamination with E. coli.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF ADULTERATED.

    Section 1(m) of the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601(m)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (8), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (9), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(10) if it is contaminated with enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) 
        Shiga toxin-producing serotypes of Escherichia coli (E. 
        coli).''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23(ii)

   Consent of Independent Accountants



   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
   statements of Badger Paper Mills, Inc. and Subsidiary on Form S-8 (File
   Nos. 333-01671 and 333-01673) of our reports dated February 4, 1997, on
   our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
   statement schedule of Badger Paper Mills, Inc. and Subsidiary as of
   December 31, 1996, and for each of the two years in the period ended
   December 31, 1996, which reports are included in this Annual Report on
   Form 10-K.




                                 /s/  COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

   Milwaukee, Wisconsin
   March 26, 1998