alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-15-00594-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-34635

Trial court: 11th District Court of Harris County

On July 8, 2015, relator, Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc., filed a petition for a writ of 

mandamus. Relator also has filed a motion for emergency stay, requesting a stay as to the trial 

court’s order compelling production of documents reflecting relator’s net worth. The motion is 

denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 10, 2015
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G. Patrick Corydon, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ G. Patrick Corydon


G. Patrick Corydon


Executive Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer


March 11, 2010








- 90 -
Order entered November 10, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01519-CV

BEVER PROPERTIES, LLC AND JESSE M. TAYLOR, D.D.S., P.A., Appellants

V.

JERRY HUFFMAN CUSTOM BUILDER, L.L.C., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-2512-04

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ October 31, 2014 unopposed motion to extend time to file reply 

brief to appellee Jerry Huffman Custom Builder, LLC’s brief and ORDER the brief be filed no 

later than November 26, 2014.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 19 25

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Mi ch el le M. St rin gf

ie ld

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Co se nt in o's Fo od Sto res
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l

Defe nd an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i - Kan sa s C it y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Decem

be r 13 , 20 18 Fi le d: Decem

be r 18 , 20 18 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BENTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Mi ch el le M. St rin gf

ie ld ap pe al s th e a d v e rs e jud gm en t th e di st ric t co ur t 1

en te red , fo ll owi ng a be nc h tri al , in he r act io n un de r th e Fam il y an d Med ic al Leav e

1 Th e Hon or ab le Bet h Ph il li ps , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e W es t e r n Dis tri ct of M is so ur i.Act (FM LA). St rin gf ie ld , a fo rm er em

pl oyee of Co s en ti no ’s Fo od St or es , al le ge d th at Co se nt in o im

pe rm is si bl y in te rfer ed wit h he r rig ht to ta ke l e a v e u nd er th e FMLA. Hav in g ju ris di ct io n u nd er 2 8 U.S.C. § 12 91 , th is co ur t af fir m s.
Upo n care fu l rev ie w of th e di st ric t co ur t reco rd an d th e pa rti es ’ arg um en ts on ap pe al , th is c o u r t f

i n d s no ba si s to rev ers e th e di st ric t co ur t’s jud gm en t. Se e Smi th

v. AS Am., I

n c
. , 8 29 F.3 d 61 6, 62 1- 22 (8 th Ci r. 20 16 ) (fo ll owi ng be nc h tri al , le ga l

co nc lu si on s are rev ie wed de no vo , an d fin di ng s of fact are rev ie wed fo r cl ear erro r). The re was no erro r in th e di st ric t co ur t’s de te rm in at io n th at th e no ti ce St rin gf ie ld ga ve Co se nt in o reg ard in g th e ne ed to ta ke FMLA le av e was un ti m el y , a nd sh e was th us no t en ti tl ed to FMLA le av e. Se e Has en wi nk el v. Mos ai c , 80 9 F.3 d 42 7, 43 2 (8 th Ci r. 20 15 ) (to pr ev ai l on FMLA en ti tl em en t cl ai m , in di vi du al m us t sh ow (1 ) sh e was
en ti tl ed to FMLA le av e; (2 ) he r em pl oyer was on no ti ce of he r ne ed fo r FMLA le av e;
an d (3 ) th e em

pl oyer de ni ed he r FMLA b en efi ts ).

The jud gm en t i s af

fir m ed

. Se e 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 35 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 35

  To provide a permanent deduction for State and local general sales 
                                 taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2009

Mrs. Hutchison (for herself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Cornyn, and 
 Mr. Martinez) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide a permanent deduction for State and local general sales 
                                 taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION OF STATE AND LOCAL GENERAL 
              SALES TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (I) of section 164(b)(5) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended by section 201 of the Tax 
Extenders and Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008, is amended by striking 
``, and before January 1, 2010''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marvin Byer, Appellant.

Submitted August 20, 2012;

decided August 28, 2012

*983Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 360 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th
  1st Session
                                 S. 360

 To limit compensation to officers and directors of entities receiving 
           emergency economic assistance from the Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2009

Mrs. McCaskill introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit compensation to officers and directors of entities receiving 
           emergency economic assistance from the Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cap Executive Officer Pay Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. LIMIT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law or 
agreement to the contrary, no person who is an officer, director, 
executive, or other employee of a financial institution or other entity 
that receives or has received funds under the Troubled Asset Relief 
Program (or ``TARP''), established under section 101 of the Emergency 
Ecomonic Stabilization Act of 2008, may receive annual compensation in 
excess of the amount of compensation paid to the President of the 
United States.
    (b) Duration.--The limitation in subsection (a) shall be a 
condition of the receipt of assistance under the TARP, and of any 
modification to such assistance that was received on or before the date 
of enactment of this Act, and shall remain in effect with respect to 
each financial institution or other entity that receives such 
assistance or modification for the duration of the assistance or 
obligation provided under the TARP.

SEC. 3. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY.

    The Secretary shall expeditiously issue such rules as are necessary 
to carry out this Act, including with respect to reimbursement of 
compensation amounts, as appropriate.

SEC. 4. COMPENSATION.

    As used in this Act, the term ``compensation'' includes wages, 
salary, deferred compensation, retirement contributions, options, 
bonuses, property, and any other form of compensation or bonus that the 
Secretary of the Treasury determines is appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      This   schedule    contains   summary    financial
                              information extracted from Barringer  Technologies
                              Inc.'s  Form  10-QSB  for the  fiscal  year  ended
                              September   30,  1997  and  is  qualified  in  its
                              entirety   by   reference   to   such    financial
                              statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1
<CASH>                                            6,097
<SECURITIES>                                      3,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7,120
<ALLOWANCES>                                        185
<INVENTORY>                                       3,177
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 20,464
<PP&E>                                            2,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   21,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,550
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                         100
<COMMON>                                             55
<OTHER-SE>                                       19,069
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     21,897
<SALES>                                          15,343
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 15,343
<CGS>                                             6,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  5,089
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3,561
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (256)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3,817
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3,817
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.61



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3512 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3512

   To provide a statutory waiver of compliance with the Jones Act to 
   foreign-flagged vessels assisting in responding to the Deepwater 
                           Horizon oil spill.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2010

 Mrs. Hutchison (for herself, Mr. LeMieux, and Mr. Cornyn) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide a statutory waiver of compliance with the Jones Act to 
   foreign-flagged vessels assisting in responding to the Deepwater 
                           Horizon oil spill.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Water Assistance from International 
Vessels for Emergency Response Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVERS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, section 12112 and 
chapter 551 of title 46, United States Code, shall not apply to any 
vessel documented under the laws of a foreign country while that vessel 
is engaged in containment, remediation, or associated activities in the 
Gulf of Mexico in connection with the mobile offshore drilling unit 
Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3519 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3519

To stabilize the matching requirement for participants in the Hollings 
                   Manufacturing Partnership Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2010

  Ms. Snowe (for herself, Mr. Kohl, and Mr. Lieberman) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To stabilize the matching requirement for participants in the Hollings 
                   Manufacturing Partnership Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HOLLINGS MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM COST-
              SHARING.

    Section 25(c) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 
Act (15 U.S.C. 278k(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1), (3), and (5), for 
        each of the fiscal years 2011 through 2013, the Secretary may 
        not provide a Center with more than 50 percent of the costs 
        incurred by such Center and may not require that a Center's 
        cost share exceed 50 percent.
            ``(8) Not later than 2 years after the date of the 
        enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary shall submit a 
        report to Congress on the cost share requirements under the 
        Centers program, which shall--
                    ``(A) analyze various cost share structures, 
                including--
                            ``(i) the cost share structure in place 
                        before the date of the enactment of this 
                        paragraph;
                            ``(ii) the cost share structure in place 
                        under paragraph (7); and
                            ``(iii) the effect of such cost share 
                        structures on individual Centers and the 
                        overall program; and
                    ``(B) include a recommendation for structuring the 
                cost share requirement after fiscal year 2013 to best 
                provide for the long-term sustainability of the 
                program.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------



                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landauer, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William E. Saxelby, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

 i.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Landauer, Inc. and will be retained by Landauer, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                    /s/  William E. Saxelby
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    William E. Saxelby
                                    President & Chief Executive Officer



February 8, 2010
Document

Exhibit 4.10

THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE
PROTHENA CORPORATION PLC
2020 EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN


This Thirteenth Amendment (this “Thirteenth Amendment”) to the Prothena Corporation plc 2020 Employment Inducement Incentive Plan (“2020 EIIP”), was made and adopted by the Board of Directors (“Board”) of Prothena Corporation plc, a public limited company organized under the laws of Ireland (the “Company”), on August 1, 2022 (the “Amendment Date”).


RECITALS


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the 2020 EIIP; and


WHEREAS, the Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to amend the 2020 EIIP to increase the number of ordinary shares authorized for issuance under the 2020 EIIP.


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 2020 EIIP is hereby amended as follows, effective as of the Amendment Date:


AMENDMENT


1.Section 2.28 of the 2020 EIIP is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


“2.28 “Overall Share Limit” means 1,470,000 Shares.”


2.This Thirteenth Amendment shall be and hereby is incorporated into and forms a part of the 2020 EIIP, and except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the 2020 EIIP shall remain in full force and effect.
ITRONICS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                           COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
          FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND 1997

                                    EXHIBIT 11


                       Three Months Ended Sept 30,  Nine Months Ended Sept 30,
                       ---------------------------  -------------------------
                               1998        1997           1998        1997
                            ----------  ----------     ---------  ----------
Common and common
 equivalent shares used in
 determining net loss per
 share

Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding
 during the period(1,000's)    45,078      32,476        44,278      31,000

Common equivalent shares          -           -             -           -
                           ----------  ----------    ----------  ----------

                               45,078      32,476        44,278      31,000
                           ==========  ==========    ==========  ==========


Net income (loss)           $(253,654)  $(100,871)    $(687,488)  $(375,362)

Cumulative preferred dividends
for the period                    -       ( 6,240)          -       (26,000)
                           ----------   ----------    ----------  ----------

Net income (loss) less
 cumulative preferred
 dividends for the period  $(253,654)   $(107,111)    $(687,488)  $(401,362)
                           ==========   ==========    ==========  ==========

Earnings (Loss) per share  $( 0.0056)   $( 0.0033)    $( 0.0155)  $( 0.0129)
                           ==========   ==========    ==========  ==========



                                       18

<PAGE>
**B F**  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0051 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL BONACORSI ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including Dece mber 1 4 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court November 15 2021

11/15/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0051
##### 



EXECUTION COPY
 SEPARATION AGREEMENT
 Agreement Company Executive Effective Date
 Parties
 Entire Agreement Employment Agreement
 Cessation of Employment Termination Date
 Entitlements




---



##### 



Identified Parties
  provided




---



##### 



Consulting Services
 Return of Company Property
 Restrictive Covenants Restrictive Covenants
 Non-disparagement and Cooperation




---



##### 



Dispute Proceedings
 Indemnification
 Availability of Relief




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
 Notices
  
  
  
  
  Successors
 Taxes
 Severability




---



##### 



Non-Admission
 No Mitigation
 Governing Law/Venue
 Counterparts




---



##### 



BKF CAPITAL GROUP INC.By:

/s/ Marvin OlshanName:
    Marvin OlshanTitle:
    Chairman, Board of Directors/s/ Clarke GrayClarke Gray




---



##### 



BKF CAPITAL, INC.
  
 Re: Identified Parties
  Company Separation Agreement
  Sincerely,/s/ Marvin OlshanName:
    Marvin OlshanTitle:
    Chairman, Board of Directors Accepted and Agreed to:By:

/s/ Clarke GrayClarke Gray
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50919 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUIS GEORGIA-LUCIANO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1006-1-DB

- - - - - - - - - - February 15, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Luis Georgia-Luciano appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Georgia argues that his sentence should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Georgia acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000).No. 00-50919 - 2 - Georgia’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. at 235. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.