alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). It is within our discretion to 

determine if a writ petition will be considered. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 

818 P.2d at 851. Petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that 

extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 

Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). 

Having considered both the petition and the amended 

petition,' we conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that 

extraordinary relief is warranted. See Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 

844. Thus, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 

677, 818 P.2d at 851. 

It is so ORDERED. 

iLt 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

Cherry 

cc: Renard Truman Polk 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Pershing County Clerk 

'We direct the clerk of this court to file the amended petition, 

provisionally received in this court on August 1, 2013. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 12

                      NORMAN ENERGY CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                           (in thousands of dollars)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            1995          1994          1993          1992          1991          1990
                                          --------      --------      --------      --------      --------      --------
<S>                                       <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Income from continuing operations
  as set forth in Consolidated 
  Statement of Income                     $ 65,529      $ 51,291      $ 39,935      $  6,227      $ 16,515      $100,826

Add back:
  Provision for income taxes                55,379        34,372        46,481        12,516        18,418        52,643

Less:
  Non-utility interest capitalized               0             0             0             0             0             0
                                          --------      --------      --------      --------      --------      -------- 
                                           120,908        85,663        86,416        18,743        34,933       153,469
                                          --------      --------      --------      --------      --------      --------

Fixed charges (from continuing
  operations):
  Interest                                 155,584       167,384       169,857       182,453       174,044       150,593

  Amortization of debt discount
    and expense                              3,483         3,312         3,421         4,450         3,290         2,191

  Portion of rents considered to 
    represent an interest factor            16,215        11,292        10,402         7,704         6,514         5,534
                                          --------      --------      --------      --------      --------      --------
      Total fixed charges                  175,282       181,988       183,680       194,607       183,848       158,318
                                          --------      --------      --------      --------      --------      --------

Earnings                                  $296,190      $267,651      $270,096      $213,350      $218,781      $311,787
                                          ========      ========      ========      ========      ========      ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            1.69          1.47          1.47          1.10          1.19          1.97
                                          ========      ========      ========      ========      ========      ========
</TABLE>
- 2018.10.22 Ord Amend Appr
2018.10.22 Ordinance approval - Southern Ute
3422-3

- 3422-1
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





TO THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF


EnerJex
Resources, Inc.





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No,
333-154472 on Form
S-8 of EnerJex Resources, Inc., relating to our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of EnerJex Resources, Inc. included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of EnerJex Resources, Inc. for the years ended March 31, 2009 and
2010.





/s/
      Weaver
      & Martin, LLCWeaver
      & Martin, LLCCertified Public Accountants





Kansas
City, Missouri


Date:
July 14, 2010
Exhibit 31(c)

BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

CERTIFICATION

I,
Kenneth W. DeFontes, Jr., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Baltimore Gas and Electric Company;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(f) and 15d15(f) for
the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 27, 2009

|                                      |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ KENNETH W. DEFONTES, JR.          |  | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140556 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140556 

 COA: 294900 

Wayne CC: 05-012647 FC 

MARVIN BUCHEE BRADLEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 29, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-C  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

     Dated this 14th day of November, 2005.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-C
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-C and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-C and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                            Certificate of Amendment
                      of the Certificate of Incorporation

                                       of

                        OAK HILL SPORTSWEAR CORPORATION

               Under Section 805 of the Business Corporation Law

                              --------------------

         It is hereby certified that:

         FIRST: The name of the corporation is Oak Hill Sportswear Corporation.

         SECOND: The certificate of incorporation of the corporation was filed
by the Department of State of the State of New York on November 29, 1967 under
the name Computronic Sciences Inc.

         THIRD: The certificate of incorporation of the corporation is hereby
amended to change the name of the corporation to "REXX Environmental
Corporation."

         FOURTH: To accomplish the foregoing amendment, Article 1 of the
certificate of incorporation of the corporation is hereby amended to read as
follows:

         "1. The name of the corporation is REXX Environmental Corporation."

         FIFTH: The foregoing amendment of the certificate of incorporation of
the corporation was authorized by the vote of the directors at a meeting of the
Board of Directors of the corporation, followed by the vote of the holders of at
least a majority of all of the outstanding shares of the corporation entitled
to vote on the said amendment of the certificate of incorporation.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have signed this Certificate on the 17th day of
February, 1998, and we affirm under penalties of perjury that the statements
therein are true.


                                    /s/ Arthur L. Asch
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                        Arthur L. Asch, Chairman of the Board


                                    /s/ Joseph Greenberger
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                        Joseph Greenberger, Secretary



                                 42 OF 44 PAGES
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence will hold a one-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation.

# DATES:

November 20, 2009.

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

# ADDRESSES:

The Planters Inn, 112 North Market Street, Charleston, South Carolina 29401.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: June 11, 2009.

John K. Rabiej, 

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. E9-14132 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
Exhibit No. 32

 

 

**Barnwell Industries, Inc.**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the undersigned officers of Barnwell Industries, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition as of September 30, 2010 and consolidated results of operations for the year ended September 30, 2010 of the Company and its subsidiaries.

 

 
| Dated:  December 15, 2010 | /s/ Morton H. Kinzler          |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                                | Name: Morton H. Kinzler        |
|                                | Title: Chief Executive Officer |
|                                |                           |
|                                |                           |
| Dated:  December 15, 2010 | /s/ Russell M. Gifford         |   |
|                                | Name: Russell M. Gifford       |
|                                | Title: Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

112

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  the
undersigned  officer  of ASI  Technology  Corporation  (the  "Company"),  in his
capacity and as of the date set forth below, does hereby certify with respect to
Amendment  No. 1 to the  Annual  Report of the  Company  on Form  10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission (the "10-KSB Report") that to his knowledge:

         (1) the Amendment  No. 1 to the 10-KSB  Report fully  complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (2) the  information  contained  in the  Amendment  No. 1 to the 10-KSB
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  April 25, 2005


                                                       /s/ ERIC M. POLIS
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Eric  M.  Polis,   Treasurer  and
                                              Principal  Financial  Officer  of
                                              ASI Technology Corporation
#### Holstein, Appellee, *v.*Registrar, Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles, Appellant.

[Cite as *Holstein v. Ohio Bur. of Motor Vehicles*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 1.]

(Nos. 95-2317 and 95-2547

Submitted February 19, 1997

Decided March 5, 1997.)

*Hunter, Samuels & Breckenridge*and *Donald O. Breckenridge,*for appellee.

*Ronald J. O’Brien,*City Attorney, *David M. Buchman,*City Prosecutor, and *Brenda J. Keltner,*Assistant City Prosecutor, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *Bryan v. Hudson*(1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 376, 674 N.E.2d 678.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., not participating.
FORM 10-Q--QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the period ended

 March 31, 2003

or

[  ]  Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ___________

 

Commission File Number: 33-18089-A

 

HICKORY LENDERS, LTD.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
#### In the Matter of Arthur G. Administration for Children’s Services, Appellant; Tiffany M. et al., Respondents.

[978 NYS2d 286]

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Beckoff, J.), dated March 8, 2013, which, after a hearing pursuant to Family Court Act § 1027, in effect, granted the parents’ application to parole the subject child to their custody under the petitioner’s supervision, pending determination of the petition. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 18, 2013, enforcement of the order was stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts, without costs or disbursements, the parents’ application is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Following a hearing conducted pursuant to Family Court Act § 1027, at which the parents testified, the Family Court directed that the subject child be paroled to the parents’ custody under the petitioner’s supervision, pending the determination of the proceeding. The petitioner appeals.

A credibility assessment of a hearing court is accorded considerable deference on appeal unless it lacks a sound and *926substantial basis in the record (see *Matter of Irene O.,*38 NY2d 776 [1975]; *Matter of Sadiq H. [Karl H.],*81 AD3d 647 [2011]; *Matter of Andrew B. [Deborah B.],*73 AD3d 1036 [2010]; *Matter of Jennifer R.,*29 AD3d 1003 [2006]). Where, as here, the Family Court’s credibility determination is not supported by the record, this Court is free to make its own credibility assessments and overturn the determination of the hearing court (see *Matter of Serenity S. [Tyesha A.],*89 AD3d 737, 739 [2011]; *Matter of Chanyae S. [Rena W.],*82 AD3d 1247 [2011]; *Matter of Melissa O. [David*O.], 73 AD3d 783 [2010]).

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that in light of, among other things, the subject child’s age and the documented history of the parents’ drug use, the child’s life or health would be at imminent risk if he were released to the custody and care of his parents during the pendency of this proceeding *(see*Family Ct Act § 1027 [a], [b], [d]; *Nicholson v Scoppetta,*3 NY3d 357, 368-370 [2004]). Moreover, the evidence adduced at the hearing demonstrated that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the imminent risk to the child’s life or health could not be mitigated by reasonable efforts short of removal *(see Nicholson v Scoppetta,*3 NY3d at 378). Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31(c)**

**BALTIMORE GAS ANDELECTRIC COMPANY**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Kenneth W. DeFontes, Jr., certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Kof Baltimore Gas and Electric Company;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 27, 2007
| /s/ KENNETH W. DEFONTES, JR.      |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| President and Chief Executive  Officer |   |

 

----