alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD): More Than the Winter Blues

      - Download PDF
      -  En español 

As the days get shorter and there is less daylight, you may start to feel sad. While many people experience the “winter blues,” some people may have a type of depression called seasonal affective disorder (SAD).

The first step is to determine how much your symptoms interfere with your daily life.

## Do you have mild symptoms that have lasted less than 2 weeks?

- Feeling down but still able to take care of yourself and others
- Having some trouble sleeping
- Having less energy than usual but still able to do your job, schoolwork, or housework

## These activities can make you feel better

- Doing something you enjoy
- Going outside in the sunlight
- Spending time with family and friends
- Eating healthy and avoiding foods with lots of sugar

If these activities do not help or your symptoms are getting worse, talk to a health care provider.

## Do you have more severe symptoms that have lasted more than 2 weeks?

- Social withdrawal
- Oversleeping
- Gaining weight
- Craving foods with lots of sugar like cakes, candies, and cookies

## Seek professional help

- Light therapy
- Psychotherapy (talk therapy)
- Medications
- Vitamin D supplements

For help finding treatment, visit NIMH’s Help for Mental Illnesses webpage.

If you or someone you know is in immediate distress or is thinking about hurting themselves, call or text the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline** at **988**or chat at 988lifeline.org**.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESNational Institutes of HealthNIMH Identification No. OM 22-4320

## Share the Infographic on Social Media

#### Seasonal Affective Disorder

Is it just the 'winter blues' or seasonal affective disorder (SAD)? This infographic may help guide you on when to seek professional help. https://go.usa.gov/xeqyS ** #shareNIMH

Copy post to clipboard

Find more resources to share on social media.

## Reprints

The information in this publication is in the public domain and may be reused or copied without permission. However, you may not reuse or copy images. Please cite the National Institute of Mental Health as the source. Read our copyright policy to learn more about our guidelines for reusing NIMH content.
EXHIBIT 31.2
------------


            RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION


I, James M. O'Connell, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Landauer, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
     necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
     under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
     the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     report;

4.   The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
     defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
     Registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
          such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
          our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
          to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
          made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
          during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
          controls and procedures and presented in this report our
          conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
          and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
          report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's
          internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
          the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
          affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
          Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
     on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
     reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
     the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
          design or operation of internal control over financial
          reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
          Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
          financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's
          internal control over financial reporting.


August 12, 2004
                              /s/ James M. O'Connell
                              ------------------------------
                              Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anonymous, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 456]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael A. Corriero, J.), entered on or about June 9, 2005, which specified and informed defendant that the court would resentence defendant to a term of 10 years for his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, unanimously affirmed, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings upon defendant’s application for resentencing.

The applicable section of the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, *337ch 738, § 23) permits a defendant to appeal, on the ground of excessiveness, from a court’s order specifying its intended resentence. We perceive no basis for reducing the proposed sentence. The record fails to support defendant’s contention that the resentencing court erroneously penalized him twice for the same violation of a 2003 cooperation agreement that led to his initial A-I felony conviction and his sentence of 15 years to life. In proposing a resentence that was two years more than the minimum permissible sentence, the court appropriately considered various factors including the quantity of drugs that were involved and the extent of defendant’s criminal conduct. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
EX-4.1 2013CHSResolutionAmending8Preferred




Exhibit 4.1


CHS INC.
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE TERMS OF THE 8% CUMULATIVE REDEEMABLE  PREFERRED STOCK TO PROVIDE FOR CALL PROTECTION


WHEREAS, on January 7, 2003, the Board of Directors of CHS Inc. (the “Company”) adopted an Amended and Restated Resolution Creating a Series of Preferred Equity to be Designated 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “2003 Resolution”), and the Company has issued shares of its 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock in several issuances pursuant to the 2003 Resolution (the “Preferred Shares”); and
WHEREAS, Section 5(a) of the 2003 Resolution provides that all shares of Preferred Stock are subject to redemption at the option of the Company at any time after February 1, 2008; and 
WHEREAS, the Company has created and intends to issue a new series of preferred equity designated as Class B Preferred Stock (the “Class B Preferred Stock”), which is expected to include a 10-year no-call period, and management and the Board of Directors have determined it is in the best interests of the Company to amend the 2003 Resolution to provide that the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock may not be redeemed at the option of the Company until July 18, 2023; and         
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors finds and determines that the establishment of a no-call period for the Preferred Shares does not adversely affect the rights or preferences of the Preferred Shares and, accordingly, Section 6(b) of the 2003 Resolution permits the amendment of the 2003 Resolution and the establishment of a no-call period for the Preferred Shares without a vote of the holders of the Preferred Shares.
RESOLVED, that, effective on the date the Company files an S-1 Registration Statement with respect to the Class B Preferred Shares, Section 5(a) of the 2003 Resolution is hereby amended by deleting the phrase “From and after February 1, 2008” therein and substituting in place of that phrase the phrase “From and after July 18, 2023”, effective immediately on adoption of this Resolution.  
FURTHER RESOLVED, that each of the President and CEO, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, the Executive Vice President  and General Counsel, and the Vice President of Accounting and Corporate Controller (the “Authorized Officers”) is authorized and directed to take all actions necessary or appropriate to give effect to the foregoing resolution, including to cause to be prepared, with the advice of counsel for the Company, and 





filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission such documents announcing this Resolution as any of the Authorized Officers deems necessary or advisable.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**SECTION1350 CERTIFICATION**

I, David K. Hill, thePrincipal Executive Officer of Kimball Hill, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that based on my knowledge theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007,filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission: (i) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
|                    |   | /s/ DAVID K. HILL                                |
|--------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|               |   | David K. Hill,                                   |
|               |   | *Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director* |
| Date: May 15, 2007 |   | * *                                         |

 

----
# ALL
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Atlantic American Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: March 29, 2007
    
    /s/ John G. Sample, Jr.

     John G. Sample, Jr.Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.1a



Under the Company's 1997 Senior  Management  Variable Pay Plan, the President of
the Company,  with the approval of the Human Resources Committee of the Board of
Directors,   annually  designates  employees  to  participate  in  the  program,
establishes  their  participation  level, and establishes  certain financial and
operational  goals for the Company which must be satisfied in order for variable
pay awards to be made. The impact, if any, of each employee's performance on his
or her variable pay award is determined by his or her officer.  Subject to final
approval  by the  Human  Resources  Committee  of the  Board of  Directors,  the
President of the Company also  determines  at year-end the degree to which those
goals  have been  satisfied  and the  amount of  variable  pay to be  awarded to
participating employees, if any.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3256 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3256

 To require a study to determine the feasibility of mitigating damages 
relating to Federal navigation work conducted at Oklahoma Beach in the 
                           State of New York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2010

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require a study to determine the feasibility of mitigating damages 
relating to Federal navigation work conducted at Oklahoma Beach in the 
                           State of New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY ON PREVENTION OR MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGE CAUSED BY 
              FEDERAL NAVIGATION WORK AT OKLAHOMA BEACH.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Project.--The term ``project'' means the Federal 
        navigation project--
                    (A) to be carried out by the Secretary at 
                Irondequoit Bay in the State of New York; and
                    (B) authorized under section 101 of the River and 
                Harbor Act of 1958 (Public Law 85-500; 72 Stat. 299).
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers.
    (b) Study.--The Secretary shall investigate and study the 
feasibility of implementing structural and nonstructural measures for 
the prevention or mitigation of shore damage at Oklahoma Beach in the 
State of New York attributable to the project.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of the study 
described in subsection (b) shall be 100 percent.
                                 <all>
```
96-2655.

#### Cambridge Arms II, Ltd. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 94-P-1130. On motion to dismiss of Hamilton County Auditor. Motion *1413denied.

Cook, J., dissents.
#### BECHIK v. HANDY MATTRESS ACCESSORIES CORPORATION.

No. 2257.

District Court, E. D. New York.

Jan. 8, 1942.

*290Morris Kirschstein, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Frederick W. Scholem, of New York City, for defendant.

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion for a bill of particulars in a patent suit.

While as stated in Selrite, Inc., v. Tropical Chair Co., Inc., D.C., 1 F.R.D. 438, patent litigation is sui generis, that does not justify the granting of all the demands herein.

Defendant’s contention that all the demands herein have been granted before does not convince me that some of them should be granted now. The practice be-, fore the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure became effective was quite different than since that time.

Under Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the bill of particulars is in reality to make the complaint more definite and certain, so as to enable the defendant to answer the complaint, which it supplements and becomes a part of the pleading.

The remedies of examination before trial, and interrogatories still remain available in proper cases.

Demand 1, requiring plaintiff to state on what claims of each patent it will rely, is granted.

Demand 2, requiring a statement of the dates of invention of the patents in suit, on which plaintiff will rely, is granted, upon the condition that there be the usual exchange of dates, in the customary manner, defendant giving the dates of invention, prior to the filing dates, if any, of any of the patents on which it will rely.

Demand 3, requiring a statement of where models of the alleged inventions may be inspected, is denied, as it is improper under the Rules.

Demand 4, requiring plaintiff to state whether he communicated with the customers of the defendant, urging them to refuse to purchase the goods of the defendant, and similar requests, are not matters which should have been alleged in the complaint. That demand is improper under the Rules, and is denied.

Demand 5, requiring plaintiff to state whether or not he has ever purchased any rights or patent applications to any inventions, alleged to be covered by any of the patents sued on, and details thereof, are not matters which should have been alleged in the complaint. That demand is improper under the Rules and is denied.

Demand 6, requiring the plaintiff to state when and in what manner the plaintiff has given notice of infringement of each of the patents in suit, to the defendant, if oral, the substance thereof, and if in writing, a copy of such notice, is proper, as plaintiff pleaded the giving of notice and this demand will properly supplement the complaint and is granted.

Defendant’s time to answer will be extended for seven days after service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, and the bill of particulars on the attorney for the defendant.

Settle order on notice.
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-D  ("Issuer") for the period
ending  September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 20th day of November, 2006.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-D
                                    ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne  Energy Income  Limited  Partnership II-D and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-D and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.