alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14091]



[[Page 28476]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


National Security Education Board Members Meeting

AGENCY: Under Secretary of Defense Personnel and Readiness, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a 
forthcoming meeting of the National Security Education Board. The 
purpose of the meeting is to review and make recommendations to the 
Secretary of Defense concerning requirements established by the David 
L. Boren National Security Education Act, Title VII of Public Law 102-
183, as amended.

DATES: June 24, 2008 (8:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m.).

ADDRESSES: National Security Education Program, 1101 Wilson Blvd., 
Suite 1210, Arlington, VA 22219.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Kevin Gormley, Program Officer, 
National Security Education Program, 1101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1210, 
Rosslyn P.O. Box 20010, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2248; (703) 696-1991. 
Electronic mail address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ecab839e8180899587ac828899c2898899"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e49617c63626b77654e606a7b206b6a7b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Security Education Board 
Members meeting is open to the public. The public is afforded the 
opportunity to submit written statements associated with NSEP.

    Dated: June 8, 2009.
Morgan E. Frazier,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-14091 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Rabiul ISLAM, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-2099.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 10, 2006.

Decided: June 29, 2006.

*367Cynthia G. Katz, Law Offices of Cynthia A. Groomes, P.C., Bethesda, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Carol Federighi, James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Rabiul Islam, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board), upholding the immigration judge’s ruling finding Islam removable and denying his motion for a continuance of his removal hearing pending adjudication of a labor certification filed by his employer on his behalf. On appeal, Islam challenges the continuance ruling.

“The immigration judge may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (2006). Whether to grant such a motion “is within the sound discretion of the immigration judge and is reviewed for abuse of discretion only.” *Onyeme v. INS,*146 F.3d 227, 231 (4th Cir.1998). Having reviewed the administrative record, we conclude that the Board did not err in finding the immigration judge acted within its discretion in denying Islam’s motion for continuance.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-01-1997
<CASH>                          82448
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   3068
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     11444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                97559
<PP&E>                          237393
<DEPRECIATION>                  88053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  247009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           13297
<BONDS>                         31
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        3
<OTHER-SE>                      188076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    247009
<SALES>                         18675
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                18675
<CGS>                           21726
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   21726
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                (188)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (3084)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (3084)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (3084)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATIONS

   Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Public Law
Number107-204), the Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies
that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Art's-Way Manufacturing Co.,
   Inc.;

2. Based upon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary
   in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
   under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
   the period covered by this report;

3. Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows
   of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
   defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company
   and have:

   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
       disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
       supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
       the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known
       to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
       period in which this report is being prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
       procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
       effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
       of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control
       over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most
       recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
       likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over
       financial reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
   to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company board
   of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
       or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which
       could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process,
       summarize, and report financial information; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
       other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
       internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ John C. Breitung
John C. Breitung
Chief Executive Officer

2/23/04
Date
#### Judith Lynn Stenroos, Respondent, v William A. Maecker, Appellant.

Decided June 6, 2013

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no appeal lies to the Court of Appeals from the order of County Court affirming the Silver Creek Village Court judgment *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5601).
Exhibit 24

 

 

March 8, 2005

 

 

TO:         		Nathan E. Langston               		John M. Adams, Jr.

Re:          		Power of Attorney; 2004 Form 10-K

Entergy Corporation, referred to herein as the Company, will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Company and the undersigned persons, in their respective capacities as directors and/or officers of the Company, as specified in Attachment I, do each hereby make, constitute and appoint Nathan Langston and John M. Adams, Jr. and each of them, their true and lawful Attorneys (with full power of substitution) for each of the undersigned and in his or her name, place and stead to sign and cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the aforementioned Annual Report on Form 10-K and any amendments thereto.

Yours very truly,

ENTERGY CORPORATION

By: /s/ J. Wayne Leonard                                           J. Wayne Leonard	9;              Chief Executive Officer      and Director
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 14 (Friday, January 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4280-4281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Notice To Rescind Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental 
Impact Statement: Lawrence, Christian, and Greene Counties, MI

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT and the Missouri 
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Rescind Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that we 
are rescinding the Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an environmental 
impact statement (EIS) for improvements that were proposed to the 
transportation system in Lawrence, Christian, and Greene Counties, 
Missouri.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy J. Casey, Environmental Projects 
Team Leader, FHWA Division Office, 3220 West Edgewood, Suite H, 
Jefferson City, Missouri 65109, Telephone: (573) 638-2620 or Kathy 
Harvey, State Design Engineer, Missouri Department of Transportation, 
P.O. Box 270, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, Telephone: (573) 526-
5678.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Missouri 
Department of Transportation (MoDOT), is rescinding the NOI to prepare 
an EIS for a project that had been proposed to improve the 
transportation system in Lawrence, Christian and Greene Counties,

[[Page 4281]]

Missouri. The NOI is being rescinded because MoDOT lacks funding to 
build this project. They do not want to concentrate their efforts on 
completing an EIS for a project which may not be built for 20 years.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

    Issued on: January 15, 2009.
Peggy J. Casey,
Environmental Projects Team Leader, Jefferson City.
 [FR Doc. E9-1420 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Quarterly Report")of Itronics, Inc. (the "Registrant") for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of theundersigned, in their capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

 

 

Date: May 15, 2006                            /S/JOHN W. WHITNEY
                                                  JohnW. Whitney

                                                  President

Date: May 15, 2006                            /S/MICHAEL C. HORSLEY
                                                  MichaelC. Horsley

                                                  Controller

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typedform within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

39
Unassociated Document


EXHIBIT (10)(98)







ALLONGE NO. 8 TO SECURED NOTE ISSUED FEBRUARY 22, 2012


 


This Allonge No. 8 to Secured Note (“Allonge”) is made as of this 11th day of April, 2013, by Attitude Drinks Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Borrower”) to Alpha Capital Anstalt (“Lender”).  Reference is hereby made to that certain Secured Note issued by Borrower to Lender dated February 22, 2012 (“Note”).  Except as amended hereby, the terms of the Note remain as originally stated.







The Principal Amount as stated on the face of the Note shall be increased to $1,196,500.00 ($175,000 – Principal Amount of Note dated February 22, 2012) + ($75,000.00 – Allonge #1 dated on or about 8/22/12) + ($150,000 – Allonge #2 dated on or about 10/15/12) + ($135,000 – Allonge #3 dated on or about 11/9/12) + ($165,000 – Allonge #4 dated on or about 12/6/12) + ($165,000 – Allonge #5 dated on or about 1/13/12) + ($220,000 – Allonge #6 dated on or about 1/14/13) + ($40,000 – Allonge #7 on or about February 15, 2013) and + ($71,500 – Allonge #8 hereto).   The amendment to the Principal Amount due and owing on the Note described herein notwithstanding, Lender does not waive interest that may have accrued at a default rate of interest and liquidated damages, if any, that may have accrued on the Note through the date of this Allonge, which default interest and liquidated damages, if any, remain outstanding and payable.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Allonge is executed as of the date written above.


 




	ATTITUDE DRINKS INC.	 
	 	 	 
	
By: 

	 
/s/ Roy G. Warren

	 
	 	Name:  Roy G. Warren	 
	 	 
Title:  President & CEO
Exhibit 32(e)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,



|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.









|/s/ Joseph F. DominoJoseph F. Domino
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer-Texas of Entergy Gulf States, Inc.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	March 1, 2007
***NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION***

***MICS AUDIT CHECKLIST***

***TABLE GAMES (TG)***

Page 26 of 27
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  A MELIA S IBUGM ACASPAC , Petitioner,

v. No. 02-1699



#  U.S. I MMIGRATION& N ATURALIZATION S ERVICE ; J OHN A SHCROFT , Attorney General, Respondents. 

# 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A72-513-082) Submitted: October 15, 2002 Decided: October 29, 2002 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Amelia Sibug Macaspac, Petitioner Pro Se. George W. Maugans, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Baltimore, Maryland; Allen Warren Hausman, Assistant Director, Emily AnneRadford, Blair Timothy O’Connor, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Amelia Sibug Macaspac, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision to deny her motion to reopen removal proceedings. Macaspac first contends thatcounsel was ineffective in failing to file an updated asylum application on her behalf by the deadline established by the Immigration Court. Because Macaspac failed to exhaust administrative remedies by raising this claim before the Board, we find that we are without jurisdiction to consider it in the context of this appeal. See Stewart v. INS , 181 F.3d 587, 596 (4th Cir. 1999); Bernal-Vallejo v. INS , 195 F.3d 56, 64 (1st Cir. 1999); Farrokhi v. INS , 900 F.2d 697, 700 (4th Cir. 1990). Macaspac next asserts that the Board, in affirming the IJ, abusedits discretion in declining to grant the motion to reopen due to Macaspac’s failure to demonstrate prima facie eligibility for asylum. Wehave reviewed the administrative record and conclude that this finding does not amount to an abuse of discretion. M.A. v. INS , 899 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1990) (en banc); see 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(a) (2002). We accordingly affirm the Board’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 M ACASPAC v. INS
EX - 10.2 SERP Amend 3


Exhibit 10.1 SERP Amendment 3


AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE 
CHS INC. 
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
(2010 Restatement)
CHS Inc., pursuant to the power of amendment reserved to it in Section 7.1 of the CHS Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“Plan”), hereby amends the Plan in the manner set forth below effective as of the date executed below.
Section 4.4 of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following new paragraph (g):
(g)    Special 2013, 2014 Contribution Credit for Shirley Cunningham.  Due to the fact that Ms. Cunningham will not have satisfied the eligibility service requirements to become an active participant in the Pension Plan for 2013 and the first four months of 2014, her 2013 contribution credits and her 2014 contribution credits for the first four months of 2014 determined under both the Pension Plan and Section 4.2(b) of this Plan will equal zero dollars ($0).  Accordingly, if Shirley Cunningham is an Active Participant in this Plan on December 31, 2013, then notwithstanding Section 4.2(b), her Pension Plan Account shall be credited with a contribution credit equal to the amount of the contribution credit which would have been credited under the Pension Plan as of December 31, 2013 if she had been an active participant in the Pension Plan since April 22, 2013 and if she is an Active Participant in this Plan on December 31, 2014, then notwithstanding Section 4.2(b), her Pension Plan Account shall be credited with a contribution credit equal to the amount of the contribution credit which would have been credited under the Pension Plan as of December 31, 2014 if she had been an active participant in the Pension Plan for the first four months of 2014.  However, such credits shall be determined as if the limitations on benefits imposed by Section 401(a)(17) and Section 415 of the Code on the Pension Plan were disregarded and if compensation deferred upon her election under any nonqualified plan maintained by CHS or any other participating employer in the Pension Plan were to be taken into account as compensation under the Pension Plan, except that amounts deferred or paid under the mandatory deferral portion of any long term incentive compensation program maintained by such an employer, any amounts she receives as replacement of forfeited compensation in accordance with her employment term sheet, or any amounts paid under any other nonqualified plan or program maintained by CHS or such a participating employer will not be considered part of that compensation.


 
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CHS Inc. has caused its name to be hereunto subscribed on this 13th day of June, 2013.
CHS INC. 
 
 
By /s/ Carl M. Casale     
 
      Its President and CEO    

114818-1739-7524\1 5/14/2013