alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          32,804
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          52,081
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    213,137
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          85,744
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            86,534
<LOANS>                                        628,930
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,047,287
<DEPOSITS>                                     727,372
<SHORT-TERM>                                   112,741
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,928
<LONG-TERM>                                    117,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,965
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,281
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,047,287
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,427
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,674
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   549
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                37,650
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,568
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,220
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           19,862
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,161
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,566
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,566
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.17
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,194
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    535
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,485
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      554
<RECOVERIES>                                       145
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,237
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,237
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            926
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  Exhibit 12(d)

                        Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
          Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and
     Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends


                                                             1996       1997      1998      1999      2000
<S>                                                          <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed charges, as defined:
  Total Interest                                             $48,007   $45,274   $40,927   $38,840   $44,877
  Interest applicable to rentals                               2,165     1,947     1,864     2,261     1,596
                                                            ------------------------------------------------

Total fixed charges, as defined                               50,172    47,221    42,791    41,101    46,473

Preferred dividends, as defined (a)                            7,610     5,123     4,878     4,878     5,347
                                                            ------------------------------------------------

Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined   $57,782   $52,344   $47,669   $45,979   $51,820
                                                             ===============================================

Earnings as defined:

  Net Income                                                 $79,210   $66,661   $62,638   $41,588   $38,973
  Add:
    Provision for income taxes:
    Total income taxes                                        41,107    26,744    28,031    17,537    22,868
    Fixed charges as above                                    50,172    47,221    42,791    41,101    46,473
                                                            ------------------------------------------------
Total earnings, as defined                                  $170,489  $140,626  $133,460  $100,226  $108,314
                                                            ================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined                  3.40      2.98      3.12      2.44      2.33
                                                            ================================================

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
 preferred dividends, as defined                                2.95      2.69      2.80      2.18      2.09
                                                            ================================================


------------------------
(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by
    dividing the preferred dividend requirement by one hundred percent (100%)
    minus the income tax rate.

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The  undersigned  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
undersigned's  best knowledge and belief,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-H  ("Issuer") for the period
ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):

      (a)   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (b)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated this 13th day of August, 2003.

                                    GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LIMITED
                                    PARTNERSHIP II-H
                                   ("Issuer")

                                    //s// Dennis R. Neill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Dennis R. Neill
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)

                                    //s// Craig D. Loseke
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Craig D. Loseke
                                    Chief Accounting Officer
                                    (Chief Financial Officer)


      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  furnished to Geodyne Energy Income  Limited  Partnership  II-H and will be
retained by Geodyne Energy Income Limited  Partnership II-H and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 22

- 10024 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,
versus JOSE MANUEL GONZALEZ

- GONZALEZ,
Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:21

- cr - 00065

- CEM

- EJK

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-10024 Date Filed: 09/15/2022 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 22

- 10024
Before LUCK, LAGOA, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

- 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard

- Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or eve n blatant error). USCA11 Case: 22-10024 Date Filed: 09/15/2022 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 21


                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT*



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   JURISDICTION OF
                                                    INCORPORATION
                                                  ----------------
<S>                                               <C>
Constellation Holdings, Inc. ..................       Maryland
Constellation Investments, Inc. ...............       Maryland
Constellation Power, Inc. .....................       Maryland
Constellation Real Estate Group, Inc. .........       Maryland
Constellation Enterprises, Inc. ...............       Maryland
Constellation Power Source, Inc. ..............       Delaware
Constellation Energy Source, Inc. .............       Delaware
Safe Harbor Water Power Corporation ...........     Pennsylvania
BGE Home Products & Services, Inc. ............       Maryland
BGE Capital Trust I ...........................       Delaware
</TABLE>

----------
* The names of certain indirectly owned subsidiaries have been omitted because,
  considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not
  constitute a significant subsidiary pursuant to Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation
  S-X.


                                       79
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00178-CR

RON EASTON D/B/A ACE BAIL BONDS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5521

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Ron Easton d/b/a Ace Bail Bonds appealed the trial court’s entry of a 

default judgment. Appellant now files a motion to dismiss his appeal, stating that the 

appeal is moot because the trial court granted a motion for new trial and amended its 

judgment. 

The motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). 

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Easton v. State of Texas Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Opinion delivered and filed July 16, 2015

[CV06]
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement numbers 333-27817 on Form S-8 filed May 27, 1997; 333-40643 on Form S-
8 filed November 20, 1997; 333-16477 on Form S-8 filed November 20, 1996; 333-
16131 on Form S-8 filed November 13, 1996; 333-15559 on Form S-3 filed November
5, 1996, as amended by Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 filed December 4, 1996; 
333-09575 on Form S-8 filed on August 5, 1996; 33-55225 on Form S-8 filed August
25, 1994; 33-54385 on Form S-3 filed June 30, 1994, as amended by Pre-Effective
Amendment No. 1 filed August 17, 1994; 33-61483 on Form S-8 filed August 1,
1995; 33-53919 on Form S-8 filed June 1, 1994; 33-60648 on Form S-8 filed April
2, 1993; 33-51064 on Form S-3 filed August 20, 1992, as amended by Pre-Effective
Amendment No. 1 filed October 23, 1992 (to which the prospectus in 33-54385 also
applies); 33-50124 on Form S-8 filed July 29, 1992; 33-65326 on Form S-8 filed
July 1, 1993; 333-32769 on Form S-8 filed August 4, 1997; 333-27965 on Form S-8
filed May 29, 1997; 33-43862 on Form S-3 filed November 12, 1991, as amended by
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 filed January 17, 1992 (to which the prospectus in
33-54385 also applies); 33-36718 on Form S-3 filed September 7, 1990, as amended
by Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 filed November 28, 1990 (to which the
prospectus in 33-54385 also applies); 33-26755 on Form S-3 filed January 27,
1989, as amended by Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 filed February 16, 1989 and
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 filed November 3, 1992; 33-23192 on Form S-3
filed July 21, 1988, as amended by Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 filed September
13, 1988 (to which the prospectus in 33-54385 also applies); 2-93664 on Form S-3
filed on October 9, 1984, as amended by Amendment No. 1 filed November 23, 1984;
33-28252 on Form S-8 filed April 19, 1989, as amended by Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 filed August 15, 1989 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 filed
on February 22, 1990; 33-13368 on Form S-8 (to which the prospectus in 33-28252
also applies); 33-29646 on Form S-8 filed June 30, 1989, as amended by Post-
Effective Amendment No. 1 filed August 3, 1990; and 2-82873, 2-71577, 2-64201, 
2-58595, 2-57423, 2-53068, 2-47747, 2-32651 and 33-14135 on Form S-8 (to all of
which the prospectus in 33-29646 also applies), of BankAmerica Corporation and
in their related prospectuses of our report dated January 20, 1998, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of BankAmerica Corporation incorporated
by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1997.




                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Francisco, California
March 13, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          24,766
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             398
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     22,641
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           6,704
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,827
<LOANS>                                        169,270
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 240,954
<DEPOSITS>                                     216,800
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,947
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,043
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 240,954
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,871
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  821
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   504
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,196
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,393
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,803
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      360
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (15)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,721
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,077
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.42
<LOANS-NON>                                        952
<LOANS-PAST>                                         7
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,148
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,787
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      330
<RECOVERIES>                                       101
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,900
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,404
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            496


</TABLE>
Exhibit
10.8





Summary
of Compensation Arrangements with Executive Officer


2009
Fiscal Year





Carrie L. Majeski currently serves as
the President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Art’s-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. (the “Company”).  The “at-will”
employment relationship between Ms. Majeski and the Company is not currently
governed by a written employment agreement.  During the 2009 fiscal
year, the Company orally agreed to increase the salary paid to Ms. Majeski from
an annual amount of $100,000 to an annual amount of $120,000.  As a
result of the increase, Ms. Majeski earned a total of approximately $117,000
during the 2009 fiscal year.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 347 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to distinguish between the severity of a qualifying loss of a 

dominant hand and a qualifying loss of a non-dominant hand for purposes of traumatic injury protection under Servicemembers’ Group Life 

Insurance, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 29, 2009 

Mr. ENSIGN (for himself and Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to distinguish between the 

severity of a qualifying loss of a dominant hand and 

a qualifying loss of a non-dominant hand for purposes 

of traumatic injury protection under Servicemembers’ 

Group Life Insurance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 347 IS

1 SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF LOSS OF DOMINANT HAND 

2 IN PRESCRIPTION OF SCHEDULE OF SEVER3 ITY OF TRAUMATIC INJURY UNDER 

4 SERVICEMEMBERS’ GROUP LIFE INSURANCE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1980A(d) of title 38, 

6 United States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘Payments under’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘(1) Payments under’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

10 paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(2) As the Secretary considers appropriate, the 

12 schedule required by paragraph (1) may distinguish in 

13 specifying payments for qualifying losses between the se14 verity of a qualifying loss of a dominant hand and a quali15 fying loss of a non-dominant hand.’’. 

16 (b) PAYMENTS FOR QUALIFYING LOSSES INCURRED

17 BEFORE DATE OF ENACTMENT.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans 

19 Affairs shall prescribe in regulations mechanisms for 

20 payments under section 1980A of title 38, United 

21 States Code, for qualifying losses incurred before the 

22 date of the enactment of this Act by reason of the 

23 requirements of paragraph (2) of subsection (d) of 

24 such section (as amended by subsection (a)(2) of 

25 this section). 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•S 347 IS

1 (2) QUALIFYING LOSS DEFINED.—In this sub2 section, the term ‘‘qualifying loss’’ means— 

3 (A) a loss specified in the second sentence 

4 of subsection (b)(1) of section 1980A of title 

5 38, United States Code; and 

6 (B) any other loss specified by the Sec7 retary of Veterans Affairs pursuant to the first 

8 sentence of that subsection. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Exhibit 12-B





Atlantic City
Electric Company





Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends


(Dollars in Thousands)





Year Ended December 31,2001

2000

1999

1998

1997Income before extraordinary item

$
75,476

$
54,434

$
63,930

$
30,276

$
85,747Income taxes


46,698


36,746


49,326


18,178


50,442Fixed charges:Interest on long-term debt including amortization of discount, premium and expense


62,166


76,178


60,562


63,940


64,501Other interest


3,314


4,518


3,837


3,435


3,574Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiary trusts


7,619


7,619


7,634


6,052


5,775Total fixed charges


73,099


88,315


72,033


73,427


73,850Earnings before extraordinary item, income taxes and fixed charges

$
195,273

$
179,495

$
185,289

$
121,881

$
210,039Fixed charges

$
73,099

$
88,315

$
72,033

$
73,427

$
73,850Preferred dividend requirements


2,724


3,571


3,777


5,289


7,506$
75,823

$
91,886

$
75,810

$
78,716

$
81,356Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends


2.58


1.95


2.44


1.55


2.58





For purposes of computing the ratio, earnings are income before extraordinary
item plus income taxes and fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on long- and short-term debt, amortization of debt discount, premium, and expense, dividends on preferred securities of subsidiary trusts, and the estimated interest
component of rentals. Preferred dividend requirements represent annualized preferred dividend requirements multiplied by the ratio that pre-tax income bears to income.
#### EICKHOFF v. VULCAN IRON WORKS.

No. 1164.

District Court, Middle District, Pennsylvania.

June 12, 1942.

*491Bialkowski, Bialkowski & Bialkowski, of Scranton, Pa., for plaintiff.

Howson & Howson, of Philadelphia, Pa., and O’Malley, Hill, Harris & Harris, of Scranton, Pa., for defendant.

WATSON, District Judge.

This case is before the Court for disposition of a motion by the plaintiff to review the action of the Clerk in taxing the costs. The plaintiff seeks to have items 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 of defendant’s bill of costs dismissed as not properly taxable.

At the argument, the plaintiff withdrew his objection to items 7, 8, and 9. Item 5 deals with the cost of taking and transcribing the testimony in the case. The general practice in this court is that the losing party shall bear the entire expense thereof. I find nothing in the record that would warrant a finding that the parties intended that this practice be changed for the purpose of this case and the motion as to this item is denied.

Item 6 deals with the cost of obtaining a certified copy of the file wrapper and contents of the patent in suit. I find that this is a proper charge and the objection thereto must be overruled. Cincinnati Traction Bldg. Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co., D.C., 27 F.Supp. 329.

Item 10 sets forth the cost of making drawings offered in evidence in the sum of $515.85. I find that these drawings were necessary in order that the Court might have a proper understanding of the subject matter of the suit and, although their preparation was not ordered or authorized by the Court, the defendant undoubtedly would have been directed to supply drawings similar to those under consideration.

Item 11 consists of a claim for the cost of constructing a model which was offered in evidence. I find no special circumstance which would warrant the allowance of this item as a part of the cost of this case. Therefore, the objection to this item must be sustained. Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co. v. Beckwith Machinery Co., D.C., 25 F.Supp. 591.

Now, June 12, 1942, it is ordered that the defendant be, and it is hereby, allowed the sum of $728.23 as costs in the above entitled proceeding.