alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 113 (Monday, June 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13922]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 9, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521:
    1. First BanCapital Fund I, LP.; First BanCapital Parallel Fund I, 
LP.; CBCF Partners, L.P.; MJR, LLC; MJR Financial Group, LLL, all of 
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania; to acquire between 6.1 and 9.7 percent of the 
voting shares of Old Florida Bancsahres, Inc., and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of Old Florida National Bank, both of Longwood, 
Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 9, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-13922 Filed 6-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALTIMORE
GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY'S DECEMBER 31, 1999 CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT,
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000009466
<NAME> BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        5,523
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        414
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             655
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           681
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,273
<COMMON>                                         1,494
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                861
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   2,355
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        190
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             2,206
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     129
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      524
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   1,869
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    7,273
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        3,028
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               178
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,324
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,502
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            526
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   8
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     534
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           206
<NET-INCOME>                                       262
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         13
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      249
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           251
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          174
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             783
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document

EXHIBIT 10.6


MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC.


Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors


Cash Compensation


Annual retainer for non-employee directors:                  $65,000 per annum, paid quarterly


Additional annual retainers:


Independent Chairman:                          $45,000 per annum, paid quarterly


Chairman of the Audit Committee:                  $25,000 per annum, paid quarterly


Chairman of the Compensation Committee:              $20,000 per annum, paid quarterly


Chairman of the N&G Committee:                   $12,000 per annum, paid quarterly


Chairman of the M&A and Finance Committee:              $12,000 per annum, paid quarterly


Chairman of the Government Relations Committee:     $12,000 per annum, paid quarterly


Directors are entitled to be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings.


Quarterly retainer payments shall be paid in arrears within 30 days following the end of each quarter.  The full quarterly retainer shall be paid to each director who served on the Board during all or a portion of a quarter.  


Equity Compensation


New non-employee directors will be granted equity awards in connection with their first election to the Board.  These awards will be granted by the Board of Directors and will consist of shares of restricted stock for the number of shares of common stock equal to $225,000 divided by the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during the 30 calendar days prior to the date of grant.  These awards will vest as to 50% of the covered shares on each of the first two anniversaries of the date of grant. 


Non-employee directors may also receive annual restricted stock awards for the number of shares of common stock equal to $175,000 divided by the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during the 30 calendar days prior to the date of grant.  These awards will vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant.


Non-employee directors will not be eligible to receive an annual restricted stock award for the fiscal year in which they are first elected.


Approved by the Board of Directors, as amended, on July 26, 2022.
1.1    1
Order entered July 23, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00307-CV

THIEN AN VO, Appellant

V.

HARRIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-72816

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal is currently due. By motion filed July 

22, 2021, appellant requests we declare her indigent so that the court reporter 

responsible for the record will file the record. Appellant notes she filed a statement 

of inability to afford costs in the trial court and was allowed to proceed there 

without payment of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145. She explains, however, that the 

court reporter has nonetheless asked for an order showing she is indigent.
Under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145, a party who has filed a statement 

of inability to afford costs cannot be required to pay costs unless ordered to do so. 

See id. Because nothing before the Court reflects appellant has been ordered to 

pay costs, we GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER Darlene Stein, 

Official Court Reporter for the 133rd Judicial District Court, to file the reporter’s 

record without payment of costs. The record shall be filed no later than August 9, 

2021.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Stein 

and the parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our report dated March 10, 2005, except forthe second paragraph of the fixed asset section of Note 1 andthe last two paragraphs of Note 13, the date of which isNovember 2, 2005, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and our report dated March 10, with respect tomanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of BKF Capital Group, Inc. andSubsidiaries (the “Company”) included in the AnnualReport on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004.We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of saidreports in the Registration Statements of the Company onForm S-8 (File Nos. 333-50132 and
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                         5
<MULTIPLIER>                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               5,014
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       82,672
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         22,407
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   120,285
<PP&E>                                              48,521
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (31,063)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     151,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               88,430
<BONDS>                                              3,138
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             8,166
<OTHER-SE>                                          37,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       151,861
<SALES>                                            521,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   521,271
<CGS>                                              474,027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      474,027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,331)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,088
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (2,419)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (2,419)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.30)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13450]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,772]


Snorkel International, Inc., Elwood, KS; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on April 8, 2009, in response 
to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Snorkel International, 
Inc., Elwood, Kansas.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 5th day of May, 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13450 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         17,437,000
<SECURITIES>                                   104,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,692,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (320,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,448,000
<PP&E>                                         9,103,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,077,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 33,821,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,966,000
<BONDS>                                        10,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          12,914,000
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       18,731,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,359,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   33,821,000
<SALES>                                        7,550,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,550,000
<CGS>                                           9,639,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  25,588,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (607,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,589,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,020,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (19,020,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (19,020,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (2.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.09)
        


</TABLE>
No. 4881.

(Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.)

#### MISS NICOLETTA SHELLY vs. LOUIS MIRAMON.

January 24, 1910.

W. J. *&*P. P. Hennessey for plaintiff and appellee.

Carroll, Henderson & Carroll for defendant and appellant.

ST. PAUL, J.

Considering the agreement of counsel on file

> “that the cause be remanded to the Civil District Court, Division D, in order that testimony may be taken and judgment rendered on the question of the defendant in order of seizure and sale rendered in said matter:”

It is ordered that the cause be remanded for the sole purpose of hearing and reporting to this court testimony on the question of acquiescence by appellant in the judgment herein appealed from.

Defendant’s Appeal.

Appeal from the Civil District Court, Division D.

ST. PAUL, J. — Plaintiff issued executory process against property belonging to defendant» The property was duly seized and sold by the Sheriff, and, thereafter, defendant took a devolutive appeal from the order directing the executory process to issue.

Thereupon plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal on *508the ground that defendant had acquiesced in the execution of the writ and the seizure and sale of the property. The case was remanded for the purpose of taking evidence on that point.

June 20, 1910.

This evidence is now before us and shows that defendant was fully cognizant of the proceedings about to- be taken against his property, even before such proceedings were begun; that he was in consultation with the parties in interest and raised no objection to the fact or form of such proceedings; that he was present at the sale made by the Sheriff, entered no protest against the same, and even arranged to have some one to bid on the property for his account.

We are of opinion that these facts taken together show a complete acquiescence on the part of defendant in the proceedings. His appeal must, therefore, be dismissed.

Code of Practice, Arts. 567, 612.

Appeal of Louis Miramon dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 116 (Thursday, June 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1615]


Expansion and Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 147, Reading, 
Pennsylvania Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-
Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zone Corporation of Southern 
Pennsylvania, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone No. 147, submitted an 
application to the Board for authority to expand and reorganize FTZ 147 
by deleting Site 4--Parcels A and C (632 acres total) and adding four 
additional sites (Sites 16-19) in Franklin and Cumberland Counties, 
Pennsylvania, adjacent to the Harrisburg Customs and Border Protection 
port of entry (FTZ Docket 35-2008, filed 5/27/2008);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (73 FR 31812, 6/4/2008) and the application has been processed 
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand and reorganize FTZ 147 is approved, 
subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 
400.28, subject to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for 
the overall general-purpose zone project, and further subject to a 
sunset provision that would terminate authority on May 31, 2014, for 
Sites 16-19 where no activity has occurred under FTZ procedures before 
that date.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of May 2009.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-14245 Filed 6-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of M.A. and M.A., children. )

___________________________________)

)

K.A., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2298

)

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )

FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM )

PROGRAM, )

)

Appellees. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed October 17, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; Robert Branning, Judge.

Karen H. Brouse, Blue Ridge, Georgia for 

Appellant.

Meredith K. Hall of Children's Legal 

Services, Bradenton, for Appellee 

Department of Children and Families.

Laura Lee, Tallahassee, and Rocco J. 

Carbone, III, St. Augustine, for Appellee 

Guardian Ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.
- 2 -

Affirmed. 

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20217

(Summary Calendar)

NORMAN GRENIER,

Plaintiff——Counter Defendant——Appellant,

versus

NOBLE DRILLING CORPORATION,

Defendant——Counter Claimant——Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(CA-H-94-3212)

 August 19, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM*:

In this appeal from an employment discrimination case,

Plaintiff - Counter Defendant - Appellant Norman Grenier challenges

the district court's grant of a summary judgment of dismissal in

favor of his former employer, Defendant - Counter Claimant -
2

Appellee Noble Drilling Corporation. We have carefully reviewed

the district court's opinion and the arguments set forth in the

appellate briefs of both parties; and we are convinced that the

district court correctly applied the law to the facts, which in all

material respects are undisputed, and reached the appropriate

conclusions, as reflected by its judgment. We therefore adopt the

opinion of the district court, a copy of which we attach hereto,

and affirm the judgment of that court. 

AFFIRMED.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 21-10883

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:03-cr-00016-MW-MAF-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HERNANDEZ LOPAZ DANIELS, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(September 3, 2021)

Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

USCA11 Case: 21-10883 Date Filed: 09/03/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2

Randolph Murrell, counsel for Hernandez Lopaz Daniels in this appeal of 

the denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018, 

Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404(b), 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (“First Step Act”), has moved 

to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant 

to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire 

record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is 

correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable 

issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district 

court’s denial of Daniels’s motion for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act 

is AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 21-10883 Date Filed: 09/03/2021 Page: 2 of 2
WRITTEN STATEMENT OFTHE PRESIDENT  

AND CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350  

        Solelyfor the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned President,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Badger Paper Mills, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report onForm 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Ronald E. Swanson
#### TAPSS, LLC, petitioner, v. NUNEZ COMPANY.

No. 06-741.

Jan. 8, 2007.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.