alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28493-28494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14161]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a 
Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and 46 CFR 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicants
I.M.A. Limited dba Miracle Brokers International, 207 Sparkys Drive, 
George Town, Grand Cayman, KY1-1007 Cayman Islands, Officer: Irma M. 
Arch, Director (Qualifying Individual)
World Wide Cargo Partners, LLC, 7901 Stoneridge Drive, Ste. 117, 
Pleasanton, CA 94588, Officer: Joyce E. Behringer, Manager (Qualifying 
Individual)

Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicants

[[Page 28494]]

Transmodal Corporation, 48 South Franklin Turnpike, Suite 202, Ramsey, 
NJ 07446, Officer: Max Angel Kantzer, President (Qualifying Individual)
Scrap Freight Inc., 801 S. Garfield Ave., <greek-i>101, Alhambra, CA 
91803, Officer: Stephen Leng, President (Qualifying Individual)
Magic Transport, Inc., PR-2 KM 19.5 Interior BO. Candelaria, Pepsi 
Industrial Park, TOA Baja PR 00949, Officers: Jorge Mangual, Asst. 
Secretary (Qualifying Individual) Carlos Padial, President
Interlogistix, LLC, 5075 Paloma Street, Brighton, CO 80601, Officer: 
Brad Schmeh (Qualifying Individual)
Guempel Lynnwood Corporation dba GalaxSea Freight Forwarding, 4828 45th 
Pl., SW, Lynnwood, WA 98087, Officer: Terrina R. Guempel, President 
(Qualifying Individual)
American Global Logistics LLC, 53 Perimeter Center E., <greek-i>450, 
Atlanta, GA 30346, Officer: Otto J. Valdes, Managing Member (Qualifying 
Individual)

Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicants
Upakweship, Inc., 1629 Folly Rd., Charleston, SC 29412, Officer: Mark 
A. Nash, President (Qualifying Individual)

     Dated: June 11, 2009.
Tanga S. FitzGibbon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-14161 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
SCWC-30516

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I ,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

LAWRENCE PAI,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. 30516; CASE NO. 1DTA-10-00706)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Lawrence Pai’s

application for writ of certiorari, filed on September 12, 2011,

is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 21, 2011.

Timothy MacMaster for

petitioner/defendantappellant on the

application

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-30516

21-OCT-2011

09:24 AM
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

July 23, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-10538

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 05-00108-CR-J-32-MMH

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LOVARNSO A. WALKER,

a.k.a. Scoot,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(July 23, 2009)

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges,

PER CURIAM:

Sylvia A. Irvin, appointed counsel for Lovarnso A. Walker in this appeal,

has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d

493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's decision regarding the

extent of the reduction of Walker’s sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2),

is AFFIRMED.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND THE AUDITED  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
OF  THE  REGISTRANT  AS OF THE  AND  FOR  THE  YEAR  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1998,
RESPECTIVELY,  AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS. AMOUNTS ARE IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         37,912
<SECURITIES>                                   9,712
<RECEIVABLES>                                  236,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                   18,724
<INVENTORY>                                    111,734
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               439,124
<PP&E>                                         503,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                 290,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 755,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          174,909
<BONDS>                                        109,757
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       21,956
<OTHER-SE>                                     445,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   755,729
<SALES>                                        1,059,669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,079,498
<CGS>                                          648,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  648,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               320,847
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               8,460
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,772
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                99,513
<INCOME-TAX>                                   40,194
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            59,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   59,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.63
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700054

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

CARLETON M. MIELKE

Hospitalman Apprentice (E-2), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Robert J. Crow, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Southeast, Naval 

Air Station, Jacksonville, FL.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Commander 

George W. Lucier, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Commander Donald R. Ostrom, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 24 August 2017

_________________________

Before HUTCHISON, FULTON, and RUSSELL, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

The supplemental court-martial order will reflect that the appellant is 

credited with having served 126 days of pretrial confinement.

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 31.1****Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification**I, Stephen J. Hansbrough, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HearUSA, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: November 14, 2006     /s/Stephen J. Hansbrough Stephen J. Hansbrough     President/Chief Executive Officer
97-224.

#### Garfield Hts. Firefighters, Internatl. Assn. of Fire Fighters, Local # 340 v. Garfield Hts.

Cuyahoga App. No. 69652. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 11

                SYBRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                               Three Months Ended
                                                    December 31,
                                                 1997      1996
                                                 ----      ----
Basic:
<S>                                            <C>        <C>     
   Income available to Common Shareholders..   $ 19,335   $ 15,678
                                               ========   ========

   Weighted average Common shares ..........     96,442     93,960
                                               ========   ========

   Basic earnings per share ................   $    .20   $    .17
                                               ========   ========


Diluted:
   Income available to Common Shareholders..   $ 19,335   $ 15,678
                                               ========   ========

   Weighted average Common shares ..........     96,442     93,960
   Common equivalent shares ................      3,894      3,282
                                               --------   --------
                                                100,336     97,242
                                               ========   ========

   Diluted earnings per share ..............   $    .19   $    .16
                                               ========   ========
</TABLE>


(As adjusted for the two-for-one stock split effective February 20, 1998).

                                      EI-2
#### IBC Sales Corporation et al., Appellants, v Village of Black River, Respondent.

[978 NYS2d 707]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered August 24, 2012. The order denied the motion of plaintiffs for leave to file a late notice of claim on defendant.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Lindley, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 12(a)

               CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 12 Months Ended
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   December December December December December
                                     1999     1998     1997     1996     1995
                                   -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
                                             (In Millions of Dollars)
<S>                                <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Income from Continuing Operations
 (Before Extraordinary Loss)......  $326.4   $305.9   $254.1   $272.3   $297.4
Taxes on Income, Including Tax
 Effect for BGE Preference Stock
 Dividends........................   182.5    169.3    145.1    148.3    152.0
                                    ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
Adjusted Income...................  $508.9   $475.2   $399.2   $420.6   $449.4
                                    ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
Fixed Charges:
 Interest and Amortization of Debt
  Discount and Expense and Premium
  on all Indebtedness.............  $245.7   $255.3   $234.2   $203.9   $206.7
 Earnings required for BGE
  Preference Stock Dividends......    21.0     33.8     45.1     59.4     61.0
 Capitalized Interest.............     2.7      3.6      8.4     15.7     15.0
 Interest Factor in Rentals.......     1.8      1.9      1.9      1.5      2.1
                                    ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
 Total Fixed Charges..............  $271.2   $294.6   $289.6   $280.5   $284.8
                                    ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
Earnings (1)......................  $777.4   $766.2   $680.4   $685.4   $719.2
                                    ======   ======   ======   ======   ======
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
 Charges..........................    2.87     2.60     2.35     2.44     2.52
</TABLE>

--------
(1) Earnings are deemed to consist of income from continuing operations (be-
    fore extraordinary loss) that includes earnings of Constellation Energy's
    consolidated subsidiaries, equity in the net income of BGE's unconsoli-
    dated subsidiary, income taxes (including deferred income taxes, invest-
    ment tax credit adjustments, and the tax effect of BGE's preference stock
    dividends), and fixed charges other than capitalized interest.

                                      96
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000833054     
<NAME>                             GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PARTNERSHIP II-C
                                    
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                 1,302,424
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            158,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,460,435
<PP&E>                                 9,269,178
<DEPRECIATION>                         7,828,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         3,040,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     48,306
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                             2,942,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           3,040,458
<SALES>                                  896,558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       2,303,071
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            598,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        1,704,579
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,704,579
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                           1,704,579
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              10.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
 

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3 Q3 FY2013








TWENTY- SIXTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Twenty-Sixth Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of March 1, 2013, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Employer") and Thomas Martin ("Executive").




Recitals


		
	A)
	On March 31, 1998 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive. 




		
	B)
	Said Employment Agreement has been amended on twenty-five prior occasions;




		
	C)
	Employer and Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow:




Agreement 




1.    Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement, which provides:


3.1    Term.  The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on April 1, 1998 and shall continue until March 31, 2013 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided (the "Employment Term").




is hereby amended, effective as of March 1, 2013, to provide as follows:




3.1    Term.  The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on April 1, 1998 and shall continue until March 31, 2014 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided (the "Employment Term").




		
	2.
	All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective.






Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.


EXECUTIVE                            EMPLOYER
PriceSmart, INC.


Thomas Martin                    By: ___________________


______________________            Name: Jose Luis Laparte    


Its: CEO & President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7123
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ETON ROSE, a/k/a Tony Barrett, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-01-421; CA-03-613-1) Submitted: November 3, 2004 Decided: November 19, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eton Rose, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although Rose indicates that he signed the notice of appeal on June 26, 2004, it is not clear whether he submitted the notice to prison officials in a timely manner or whether he even utilized his institution’s internal mail system. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Eton Rose seeks to appeal the denial of relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The notice of appeal was received in the district court approximately seven days after the expiration of the appeal period. Under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988), the notice is considered filed as of the date Rose properly delivered it to prison officials for mailing to the court. The record does not reveal if or when Rose complied with the requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1). * Accordingly, we remand the case for the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack . The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23(A)

             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the 
incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's 
previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 33-41184, 33-53357,33-53359,
33-57597, 33-57599, 33-63571, 33-64305, 333-16357, 333-19687, 333-21005, 
333-21519, and 333-21649.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Jacksonville, Florida
March 18, 1997
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 1 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 2 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 3 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 4 not include the filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 7 Plaintiff-Appellee, 8
v. NO. 30,644 9 JERRY CARRASCO, 10 Defendant-Appellant. 11
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY 12 William G. Shoobridge, District Judge 13 Gary K. King, Attorney General 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 for Appellee 16 Ching Law Firm 17 Alexander B. Ching 18 Hobbs, NM 19 for Appellant 20
MEMORANDUM OPINION 21 CASTILLO, Judge. 222 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed, 2 and the time for doing so has expired. 3 Dismissed. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

___________________________________ 6 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

__________________________________ 9 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 10

__________________________________ 11 ROBERT. E. ROBLES, Judge 12