alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Entergy
Mississippi's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000066901
<NAME> ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI INC.
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER> 016
   <NAME> ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,045,103
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     13,454
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         284,252
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       178,657
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,521,466
<COMMON>                                       199,326
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                         (143)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            225,764
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 482,828
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,000
<PREFERRED>                                     57,881
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           399,054
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              50,253
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   96,015
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 486,316
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,521,466
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      958,430
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            41,106
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     793,834
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     793,834
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        164,596
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,805 
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 167,401
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        47,084
<NET-INCOME>                                    79,211 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      5,010
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   74,201 
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        79,900
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         181,966
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,985,692
<SECURITIES>                                20,964,907
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,772,293
<ALLOWANCES>                                   265,000
<INVENTORY>                                 24,093,113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,142,527
<PP&E>                                       1,979,925
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,235,964
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,261,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,685,584
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       177,681
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,398,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,261,747
<SALES>                                      4,248,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,248,720
<CGS>                                        2,639,975
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,639,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               914,128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                694,617
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            694,617
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   694,617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        


</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3501 

To protect American job creation by striking the job-killing Federal employer 

mandate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2010 

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To protect American job creation by striking the job-killing 

Federal employer mandate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Job Protec5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECT JOB CREATION. 

7 Sections 1513 and 1514 and subsections (e), (f), and 

8 (g) of section 10106 of the Patient Protection and Afford9 able Care Act (and the amendments made by such sections 

10 and subsections) are repealed and the Internal Revenue 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3501 IS

1 Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered as if such 

2 provisions and amendments had never been enacted. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Balchem   Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dino A.
Rossi, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


                                              /s/ Dino A. Rossi
                                              Dino A. Rossi
                                              Chairman, President, and
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)
                                              March 12, 2009

      This  certification  accompanies the  above-described  Report on Form 10-K
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent  required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       69
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy gives notice of its intent to grant Sigma Technologies International a revocable, nonassignable, partially exclusive license, with exclusive field of use in passivation of aluminum flake pigments that have a flake thickness of 5 nm to 2 micron and an area of 10 nm to 500 microns in diameter, in the United States to practice the Government-owned invention, U.S. Patent 7,193,649 entitled “Passivation Layer on Aluminum Surface and Method Thereof.” 

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later than February 20, 2009. 

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with Indian Head Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Code CAB, Suite 107, 1st floor, 3824 Strauss Avenue, Indian Head, MD 20640-5152. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. J. Scott Deiter, Head, Technology Transfer Office, Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division, Code CAB, 3824 Strauss Avenue, Indian Head, MD 20640-5035, telephone: 301-744-6111. 

Dated: January 15, 2009. 

A.M. Vallandingham, 

Lieutenant Commander,  Judge Advocate General's Corps,  U.S. Navy,  Federal Register Liaison Officer.

 [FR Doc. E9-1452 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7802

ALFRED MILTON RIVERA, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus WARDEN BLEDSOE, United States Penitentiary - Lee, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-638-7) Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 4, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alfred Milton Rivera, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).*To the extent Rivera may be seeking authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second and successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, such a motion should be filed in the circuit in which he was sentenced. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Alfred Milton Rivera, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order that construed his petition he labeled as filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and dismissed it as successive. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a subst antial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rivera has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. * DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000010242
<NAME> BASE TEN SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,502,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,808,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    478,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,692,000
<PP&E>                                       4,305,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,217,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,021,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,214,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (13,196,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,217,000
<SALES>                                      2,512,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,660,000
<CGS>                                        3,436,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,640,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,627,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (15,980,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (15,980,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (6,027,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (22,007,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.79)
        

</TABLE>
----

|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                             |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |

|   |   | June      18, 2010                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                              |
|   |   | By:      /s/ Joseph Young     |
|   |   |                                              |
|   |   | Joseph      Young                                 |
|   |   | Princpal      Accounting Officer                  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                 6,137,490
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,548,063
<PP&E>                                         581,420
<DEPRECIATION>                                (119,741)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,652,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,868,457
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       257,718
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,292,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,652,447
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,814,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (17,578)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,797,195)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,797,195)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,797,195)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6
​
Amendment to Appendix 1 – Scope of Employment
​
This document serves as an amendment to the vacation paragraph within your most recent employment agreement appendix. The below paragraph replaces the paragraph related to vacation in its entirety. This amendment does not constitute a new employment agreement or alter any other terms of your employment with Enfusion.
​
In accordance with Enfusion’s Flexible Time Off policy effective July 1, 2022, which may be amended from time to time, Employee is entitled to flexible time off as needed each calendar year. Flexible Time Off will not accrue or vest and therefore will not be paid out at the time of separation of employment. Any unused and unexpired accrued vacation days that Employee earned under the previous policy will expire on December 31, 2022 if unused by the Employee. If the Employee’s Termination Date is on or before December 31, 2022, the Employee will receive a final payment for all vested paid vacation time through their Termination Date. If the Employee’s Termination Date is on or after January 1, 2023, in accordance with Enfusion’s vacation policy, Employee will not be paid out for any expired accrued vacation days. Any employee beginning employment after July 1, 2022 will not accrue vacation days.
​
​
/s/ Bronwen Bastone
​
Bronwen Bastone
Chief People Officer
July 01, 2022
​
​
/s/ Steve Bachert
​
Steven (Steve) Bachert
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6807

ANTHONY W. TIMMONS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD MOATS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA98-515-S)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: November 16, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony W. Timmons, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony W. Timmons seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Timmons v. Moats, No. CA-98-515-S (D.

Md. May 5, 1998). Timmons’ motion for appointment of counsel is

denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1240

___________

Rick Lee Grove, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota

Bureau of Prisons; Martha Jordan, *

Warden, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: February 11, 1998

 Filed: February 25, 1998

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Rick Lee Grove appeals from a final order of the United States District Court for

the District of Minnesota, summarily dismissing with prejudice Grove&s 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In light of our recent decision in Martin v.

Gerlinski, No. 97-2232, 1998 WL 7258 (8th Cir. Jan. 13, 1998), and for the reasons

discussed therein, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case to

the district court with instructions to refer the case to the Bureau of Prisons to properly

consider Grove&s eligibility for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e)(2)(B).

See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.0

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

-     2 Quaker Road Corp., a New York Corporation

-     2 Quaker Road, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company

-     265 Livingston Street Corp., a New Jersey Corporation

-     Barrcip Inc., a Delaware Corporation

-     Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a New York Corporation

-     BRL, Inc. d/b/a Barr Research, a Delaware Corporation

-     Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

-     Marketmaster, Inc., an Ohio Corporation

-     Duramed Reasearch and Development Corporation, a New York Corporation

-     Duramed Europe, Ltd., a UK Corporation