alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 182 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means 

in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mr. NEAL (for himself and Mr. BRADY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Ways and Means in the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Ways and 

4 Means (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $20,634,454 for the One Hundred 

9 Sixteenth Congress. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 182 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $10,119,889 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2019, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2020; and 

7 (2) not more than $10,514,565 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2020, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2021. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         332,385
<SECURITIES>                                 2,197,444
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               746,497
<PP&E>                                       1,510,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                 495,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,492,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          361,543
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,549,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,492,806
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               246,476
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               567,230
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,016,922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,016,922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,016,922)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (39.38)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (39.38)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EOS IS NET LOSS PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration 

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT and the Missouri Department of Transportation. 

# ACTION:

Rescind Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact statement. 

# SUMMARY:

The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that we are rescinding the Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) for improvements that were proposed to the transportation system in Lawrence, Christian, and Greene Counties, Missouri. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy J. Casey, Environmental Projects Team Leader, FHWA Division Office, 3220 West Edgewood, Suite H, Jefferson City, Missouri 65109, Telephone: (573) 638-2620 or Kathy Harvey, State Design Engineer, Missouri Department of Transportation, P.O. Box 270, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, Telephone: (573) 526-5678. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FHWA, in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), is rescinding the NOI to prepare an EIS for a project that had been proposed to improve the transportation system in Lawrence, Christian and Greene Counties,                           ( print page 4281)                        Missouri. The NOI is being rescinded because MoDOT lacks funding to build this project. They do not want to concentrate their efforts on completing an EIS for a project which may not be built for 20 years.                 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

Issued on: January 15, 2009. 

Peggy J. Casey, 

Environmental Projects Team Leader, Jefferson City.

 [FR Doc. E9-1420 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
# NIMH Pages About Eating Disorders

Overview of Eating Disorders...

Find current clinical trials on Eating Disorders...

----

### Latest Science News About Eating Disorders

Life Beyond Anorexia Nervosa
December 5, 2023

Youth Emergency Department Visits for Mental Health Increased During Pandemic
July 19, 2023

Chatbot Encourages People With Eating Disorders to Seek Care
April 17, 2023

----

### Latest Video and Audio About Eating Disorders

Let’s Talk About Eating Disorders with NIMH Grantee Dr. Cynthia Bulik

Mental Health Minute: Eating Disorders

----

### Latest Director's Messages About Eating Disorders

From Brain Mechanisms to Novel Therapies: Understanding and Treating Eating Disorders
                                                          By Joshua Gordon on                February 23, 2021
#### In the Matter of Miladin Dobric, Appellant, v Park Len North Owner, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 17, 2012;

decided May 1, 2012

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*17 NY3d 921 (2011)].
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6746

HAYES MALLOY, 

 Petitioner – Appellant, 

 v. 

WARDEN, LEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 

 Respondent – Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(8:08-cv-03125-TLW) 

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: November 5, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Hayes Malloy, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Hayes Malloy seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We 

have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Malloy

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                            |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. |

|   |   | July 13, 2012                   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|   |   |                            |
|   |   | By: /s/ Jim Poage               |
|   |   |                            |
|   |   | Jim Poage                       |
|   |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer |
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1062

MARIA S. REMINGTON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:17

- cv
- 00375

- FL )

Submitted : June 29, 2018 Decided: August 15, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and DUNCAN and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Maria S. Remington, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Maria S. Remington appeals the district court’s order acce pting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint without prejudice

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stat ed by the district

court. Remington v. Univ. of North Carolina , No. 5:17

- cv
- 00375

- FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following entities, unless otherwise indicated, are wholly-owned direct or
indirect subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 2005:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        State or Country
      Name                                               of Organization
      ----                                              ----------------
<S>   <C>                                               <C>
 1.   Baker Program Management, Inc.                    Arizona
 2.   Baker Construction, Inc.                          Delaware
 3.   Baker Global Project Services, Inc.               Delaware
 4.   Baker Holding Corporation                         Delaware
 5.   Baker/OTS, Inc.                                   Delaware
 6.   International Pipeline Services, Inc.             Delaware
 7.   Michael Baker International, Inc.                 Delaware
 8.   Baker Engineering, Inc.                           Illinois
 9.   Steen Production Services, Inc.                   Louisiana
10.   Michael Baker Jr. Company                         Nevada
11.   Michael Baker Architects/Engineers, P.C.          New Jersey
12.   Baker Engineering NY, Inc.                        New York
13.   Baker Environmental, Inc.                         Pennsylvania
14.   Baker Heavy & Highway, Inc.                       Pennsylvania
15.   Baker Mellon Stuart Construction, Inc.            Pennsylvania
16.   Michael Baker Global, Inc.                        Pennsylvania
17.   Michael Baker Jr., Inc.                           Pennsylvania
18.   Baker/MO Services, Inc.                           Texas
19.   Vermont General Insurance Company                 Vermont
20.   Baker Energy International, Ltd.                  Cayman Islands
21.   Baker O&M International, Ltd.                     Cayman Islands
22.   Baker/OTS International, Inc.                     Cayman Islands
23.   Overseas Technical Services (Middle East) Ltd.    Cayman Islands
24.   Michael Baker de Mexico S.A. de C.V.              Mexico
25.   Baker/OTS Ltd.                                    United Kingdom
26.   OTS International Training Services Ltd.          United Kingdom
27.   Overseas Technical Services (Harrow) Ltd.         United Kingdom
28.   SD Forty-Five Ltd.                                United Kingdom
29.   OTS Finance and Management Ltd.                   Vanuatu
30.   Overseas Technical Services International, Ltd.   Vanuatu
</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-005-113259-3-054-CV

THE CADLE COMPANY ANDVeErRnNoOnN WhHiIpPpPlLeECaAnNdDlLeEwWiIcCkK HoOmMeEsS, InNcC. aAnNdD LeEoO WeEnNtTzZ 	APPELLANTSS

DANIEL C. CADLEVernon Whipple

	V.

DAVID B. LOBINGIER AND THER2 EeEnNtTeErRpPrRiIsSeEsS, IiInNcC. aAnNdD TtTeEdD RrReEeEvVeEsSEdDwWaArRdDoO TrRuUjJiIlLlLoO aAnNdD PaAtTrRiIcCiIaA TrRuUjJiIlLlLoO 	APPELLEES

STATE OF TEXAS

	----------

	FROM COUNTY THE 48TH 158TH158TH DISTRICT COURT AT LAWN NO. 2 OF TARRANT DENTON TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the “aapAppellant’s’ Joint uNOPPOSEDUnopposed Motion tTo Dismiss The Appeal.”  for Mootness.”  Appeal Due To Settlement.”  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(21), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL DMD:	mMCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON ANDand DAUPHINOT, JLIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 118, 20045June 2430, 2005December 31, 2003
Exhibit 32.1
 Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Allen D. Tilley

Allen D. TilleyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Paul M. Zaidins

Paul M. ZaidinsPresident, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: 

*Name:*                         Business and Operations Advisory Committee (9556).                     

*Date/Time:*

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Stafford I, Room 375.                     

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Patty Balanga, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-8100.                     

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice concerning issues related to the oversight, integrity, development and enhancement of NSF's business operations.                     

*Agenda:*

## November 18, 2009 

Welcome/Introductions; 

OIRM/CIO/BFA Updates; 

FastLane/Grants.gov/System-to-System Capabilities; 

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act-Reporting/Update; 

NSF Workforce Management; 

iTrak-Financial System Modernization. 

## November 19, 2009 

NSF Strategic Plan Revision-2010-2015; 

Future NSF-2013 Lease Expiration; 

Committee discussion and prepare for Meeting with NSF Deputy Director; 

Discussion with Deputy Director; 

Closing Committee Discussion/Wrap-Up. 

Dated: October 20, 2009. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-25575 Filed 10-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
***EXHIBIT
      32***




***Certification
      of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer***


***Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes−Oxley Act of 2002***





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Solera National Bancorp, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10−QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul M.
      Ferguson, President of the Company, and I, Robert J. Fenton, Vice President,
      Secretary, & Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes−Oxley Act of
      2002 and in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10−QSB, that we have
      reviewed the Form 10−QSB and that to the best of our knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the Company’s financial condition and results of operations as of the date and
      for the periods covered by the Report.


Date:
                  May 10, 2007
              /s/
                  Paul M. FergusonPaul
                  M. FergusonPresident(Principal
                  Executive Officer)/s/
                  Robert J. FentonRobert
                  J. FentonVice
                  President, Secretary & Treasurer(Principal
                  accounting and chief financial
                  officer)




19
CAG-5.26-2013-10K Ex10.21




Exhibit 10.21





Personal & Confidential


May 16, 2013


Paul Maass
2115 S. 189th Circle
Omaha, NE 68130


Dear Paul:


With your increased responsibilities as President, Commercial Foods, it is my pleasure to provide you with details of your new compensation, effective May 2, 2013:


		
	1)
	Annual Salary: $600,000, payable bi-weekly at a rate of $23,076.92




		
	2)
	Annual Incentive:  You will continue to participate in the ConAgra Foods Management Incentive Plan and in future fiscal years, in accordance with the plan’s provisions.  Your targeted incentive opportunity will continue to be 100% of your annual base salary and be prorated at your new base salary as of your effective date for FY2013. 




		
	3)
	Restricted Stock Units:  The Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors has approved a grant of 15,000 restricted stock units (RSUs), subject to the provisions of the ConAgra Foods, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan.  These RSUs are scheduled to fully vest on the third anniversary of the grant date (May 15, 2013), pursuant to the terms of the plan.  Dividend equivalents are not earned or paid during the restriction period.  




		
	4)
	Long Term Incentive:  You will continue to be eligible to participate in the company’s executive long term incentive program at the Tier 2 participation level.  The program is made up of performance shares and non-qualified stock options, at an estimated value of $1,600,000 (or the equivalent grant for this level of participation), as determined each year in the discretion of the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors.  The stock awards will be granted under and are subject to the ConAgra Foods, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan (or a successor plan) and the award agreements provided.




		
	5)
	Stock Ownership Guidelines:  ConAgra Foods believes that senior management stock ownership demonstrates our commitment to our stockholders.  You will continue to be subject to the company’s stock ownership policy for senior executives as adopted by the Human Resources 







Committee of the Board of Directors from time to time.  Your ownership requirement continues to be at least four times (4x) your annual base salary.  



Page 2




I look forward to your favorable response, which you can indicate by signing and returning a copy of this letter.  


Sincerely, 


/s/ Gary Rodkin


Gary Rodkin
Chief Executive Officer
ConAgra Foods, Inc.




Enclosures


Offer Acceptance


I accept this offer of employment.  In so doing, I understand and agree that my employment with ConAgra Foods is at will, that I am not employed for any specified duration, and that my employment may be terminated by myself, or ConAgra Foods at any time, with or without cause and with or without notice.


_/s/ Paul Maass_____________________________________May 16, 2013_____________________
Signature                            Date 


cc:    Nicole Theophilus