alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000824894
<NAME>                         GEODYNE ENERGY INCOME LTD PSHP II-A

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                            641,726
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     769,904
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,411,630
<PP&E>                         31,010,576
<DEPRECIATION>                 27,563,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  5,591,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             212,370
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                      5,157,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    5,591,760
<SALES>                         1,239,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,247,671
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     685,870
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   561,801
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               561,801
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      561,801
<EPS-BASIC>                          1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income  Partners  1987-B,  Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1,473
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  296,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               307,034
<PP&E>                                         24,808,581
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (20,719,019)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,396,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          203,771
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,974,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,396,596
<SALES>                                        594,272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               602,784
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  498,536<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (174,037)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (174,037)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (174,037)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

d1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

139096 

ALISHA ANN RECKER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139096 

 COA: 284676 

Grand Traverse CC: 

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING, 07-025927-NI 

COMPANY, L.L.C., and MICHAEL ALAN 

WARNES, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of McCormick v Carrier (Docket No. 136738) is pending on appeal before this 

Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present 

application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE 

pending the decision in that case.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Gaudenzia Hroncich, Respondent, v Con Edison et al., Appellants, and Special Disability Fund, Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Submitted June 18, 2012;

decided September 6, 2012

Motion by the City of New York for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed, and for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 19 copies filed within seven days.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
E. Follin Smith, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Administrative Officer of Constellation Energy Group, Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(i)    The
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   The
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Constellation Energy
Group, Inc.

|/s/E. FOLLIN SMITH                                                                                 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|E. Follin Smith
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer |  | 

Date:
March 3, 2006

---



QuickLinks
### **Exhibit 32**

**SpherixIncorporated**

----

**Certification ofChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Richard C. Levin,Chief Executive Officer and President, and Chief Financial Officer of SpherixIncorporated (the “Company”), in compliance with Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006(the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

·                  Fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

·                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/ Richard C. Levin        |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|   |   | Richard C. Levin            |
|   |   | CEO and President and Chief |
|   |   | Financial Officer           |
|   |   | March 6, 2007               |

 

A signed copy of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SpherixIncorporated and will be retained by Spherix Incorporated and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

58

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     financial statements of AquaPenn Spring Water Company, Inc. for the period
     ended March 31, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
     financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                       U.S.$
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.000
<CASH>                                            9,149
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (100)
<INVENTORY>                                       2,836
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 17,905
<PP&E>                                           44,088    
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (7,323)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   59,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11,428
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                       45,014
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     59,140
<SALES>                                          18,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 19,045
<CGS>                                            15,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    18,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (349)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     478
<INCOME-TAX>                                        194
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 284
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        284
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .04
        


</TABLE>
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANANo.DA23-0140INRETHEMATTEROFTHEGUARDIANSHIP,ANDCONSERVATORSHIPOF:I.Q.,AProtectedPerson.GRANTPursuanttoauthoritygrantedunderMont.R.App.P.26(1),theAppellantisgivenanextensionoftimeuntilJune2,2023,toprepare,file,andservetheAppellant'sopeningbrief./04/24/2023Case Number: DA 23-0140
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

          - [F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 3-09]

The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its regulations (45 CFR Part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of Commission business and other matters specified, as follows:

*Date and Time:*                     Thursday, June 25, 2009, at 10:30 a.m.                

*Subject Matter:*                     Issuance of Proposed Decisions, Amended Proposed Decisions and Orders in claims against Albania.                

*Status:*                     Open.                

All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-6975.

Mauricio J. Tamargo,

Chairman.

[FR Doc. E9-14182 Filed 6-12-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2152

BERNARD SCARBOROUGH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WALMART CORPORATION, f/k/a Wal-Mart Super Center Stores, 

Incorporated,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,

Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00263-GCM)

Submitted: May 24, 2011 Decided: June 3, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Scarborough, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Stephen Clarke, 

LITTLER MENDELSON, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Scarborough appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his employment discrimination and malicious 

prosecution action for failure to state a clam. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Scarborough v. Walmart Corp., No. 3:10-cv-00263-GCM (W.D.N.C. 

Sept. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### George C. WELCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bill McCREEDY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-3954.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted July 14, 2006.*

Decided July 14, 2006.

Before Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge, Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge, Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge.

After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER

For more than four years the Wisconsin Department of Corrections treated prisoner George Welch for complaints relating to his right shoulder. His treatment included frequent doctor visits (including appointments with orthopedic specialists), numerous diagnostic tests, physical therapy, and a variety of pain-control and anti-inflammatory medication. Eventually he underwent a reportedly successful surgery known as an open Bankart procedure, which treated recurrent shoulder joint instability. Despite this care, Welch brought a claim *pro se*under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that various doctors and corrections officials were deliberately indifferent to his condition. In a comprehensive 45-page order, the district court granted summary judgment for the defendants and Welch appeals. We affirm.

Welch’s appellate brief recounts the undisputed facts of his treatment in great detail but barely raises any legal challenge to the district court’s decision. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 28(a)(9); *Anderson v. Hardman,*241 F.3d 544, 545 (7th Cir.2001). Generously construing his brief, we discern two issues. First, he seems to assert that the district court erred by finding that the pain and deterioration of his shoulder that he suffered during the four years preceding his surgery were not evidence that the defendants consciously disregarded his serious medical condition. But Welch’s extensive treatment record shows that corrections officials and doctors responded to his condition and, in addition to therapy and eventual surgery, prescribed medication to alleviate his pain. As we have observed, “mere differences of opinion among medical personnel regarding a patient’s appropriate treatment do not give rise to deliberate indifference.” *See Es-*
      *685
      *tote of Cole by Pardue v. Fromm,*94 F.3d 254, 261 (7th Cir.1996). Here, the record does not suggest that the choice to pursue therapy, even though some of Welch’s doctors recommended surgery earlier than it was preformed, was a “substantial departure from accepted professional judgment, practice, or standards.” *Id.*at 262. The district court therefore did not err by denying Welch’s deliberate indifference claim.

Second, he argues that the district court erroneously denied his motion for appointment of counsel, a denial that we review for abuse of discretion. *See Gil v. Reed,*381 F.3d 649, 656-57 (7th Cir.2004). But as the district court observed, the issues Welch raised were not complex enough to require the assistance of counsel, *see id.,*and thus the motion was properly denied.

For substantially the reasons stated by the district court, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Orlando Eleazar Guevara, * From the 35th District Court

of Brown County

Trial Court No. CR24084.

Vs. No. 11-17-00313-CR * August 30, 2019

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II-OW (the Registrant) for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | May 13, 2009           



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | May 13, 2009
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3389 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to exempt individuals who receive 

certain educational assistance for service in the Selected Reserve from 

limitations on the receipt of assistance under Post-9/11 Educational 

Assistance Program for additional service in the Armed Forces, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 20, 2010 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to exempt individuals 

who receive certain educational assistance for service in 

the Selected Reserve from limitations on the receipt of 

assistance under Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program for additional service in the Armed Forces, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3389 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM LIMITATION ON PERIOD OF 

2 ASSISTANCE UNDER TWO OR MORE PRO3 GRAMS OF EDUCATION ASSISTANCE FOR IN4 DIVIDUALS WHO RECEIVE EDUCATION AS5 SISTANCE FOR SERVICE IN SELECTED RE6 SERVE. 

7 (a) REPEAL OF LIMITATION.—Section 3695 of title 

8 38, United States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The aggre10 gate’’ and inserting ‘‘Except as otherwise provided 

11 in this section, the aggregate’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub13 section: 

14 ‘‘(c) In the case of an individual who served on active 

15 duty in the Armed Forces for not less than four years, 

16 the limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply with respect 

17 to the receipt by such individual of assistance under chap18 ter 30 or 33 of this title, on the one hand, and the receipt 

19 by such individual of assistance under chapter 1606 or 

20 1607 of title 10, on the other hand.’’. 

21 (b) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—Subsection (c) of 

22 such section, as added by subsection (a) of this section, 

23 shall apply with respect to any individual described in such 

24 subsection (c) regardless of whether the individual’s re25 ceipt of assistance under chapter 1606 or 1607 of title 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3389 IS

1 10, United States Code, occurs before or after the date 

2 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS