alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3465 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3465

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 15 South Main Street in Sharon, Massachusetts, as the ``Michael C. 
                        Rothberg Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 9, 2010

 Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Brown of Massachusetts) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 15 South Main Street in Sharon, Massachusetts, as the ``Michael C. 
                        Rothberg Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MICHAEL C. ROTHBERG POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 15 South Main Street in Sharon, Massachusetts, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Michael C. Rothberg Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any references in a law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Michael C. Rothberg Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           64457
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2358601
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2436497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5450
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2431047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2436497
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 15319
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (15319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15319)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.65)
        

</TABLE>
#### Ben Nehmadi, Appellant, v E. William Davis, Respondent.

Submitted April 8, 2013;

decided June 11, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### Deborah Rae Lamb et al., Appellants, v Governor for New York State et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 9, 2012;

decided June 5, 2012

Motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 21, 2012 dismissal order denied *[see*18 NY3d 920 (2012)]. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
#### Marcia L. Caronia et al., Appellants, v Philip Morris USA, Inc., Respondent.

Decided May 30, 2013

Certification of questions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, pursuant to section 500.27 of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.27), accepted and the issues presented are to be considered after briefing and argument.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.
MAILING ADRESS: NIGC/DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop #1621 Washington, DC 20040 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK; Oklahoma City, OK; Rapid City, SD

WWW.NIGC.GOV

May 15, 2023

VIA E-MAIL

Rebecca Avitia, Executive Director

Absentee Shawnee Tribe Gaming Commission

2025 S. Gordon Cooper Dr.

Shawnee, OK 74801

Re: Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Amended Gaming Ordinance

Dear Executive Director Avitia:

This letter responds to your request for the National Indian Gaming Commission 

(“NIGC”) Chairman to review and approve the Absentee Shawnee Tribe’s amended Gaming 

Ordinance (“Ordinance”). The Absentee Shawnee Tribe’s Executive Committee adopted the

amended Ordinance by Resolution L-AS-2023-13 on March 15, 2023.

Thank you for bringing the Ordinance to our attention and for providing us with a copy. The 

Ordinance is approved as it is consistent with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and NIGC 

regulations. If you have any questions or require anything further, please contact Staff Attorney 

Adam L. Candler at 202-580-5718 or by e-mail at adam.candler@nigc.gov.

Sincerely,

E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Chairman

cc: John R. Johnson, Governor, Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,848]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 24, 2009, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at MAG Automation and Controls, Machesney Park, Illinois.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of May 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13461 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Lisa M. Oakes, Individually and as Executrix of Daniel C. Oakes, Deceased, Respondent, v Rajnikant Patel, M.D., et al., Appellants.

Submitted September 10, 2012;

decided December 11, 2012

Motion to strike denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael D. Dale, Chief Executive Officer of ATS Medical, Inc. (the "Company")
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 8, 2006


/s/ Michael D. Dale
-------------------------------------
Name: Michael D. Dale
Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derly DE LA GARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41474.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Derly De La Garza appeals from his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute 8.84 grams of cocaine base. De La Garza correctly notes that his argument, made for the first time on appeal, that the district court lacked jurisdiction to convict and sentence him be*464cause 21 U.S.C. § 841 is unconstitutional under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is foreclosed by *United States v. Slaughter,*238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir. 2000). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
----

----

| 1.   | I have reviewed the Form 10-K /A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended December 31, 2009; |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           | Applied Minerals, Inc. |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------|
|                                |                   |   |
| Date:   December 14, 2010 | By:                    | /s/ ANDRE ZEITOUN |
|                                |                   | Andre Zeitoun |
|                                |                   | Principal Executive Officer |

----
No. 5042.

(Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.)

#### JOHN E. FLEURY vs. KENNER CANNING AND PACKING COMPANY, LIMITED.

Pierson, Walton & Pierson for plaintiff and appellant.

Jno. E. Pleury, A. E. Billings for defendant and appellee.

*419DUFOUR, j.

The plaintiff, a judgment creditor of defendant, issued execution on November 20, 1909, caused certain real estate to be seized and advertised for sale on January 15, 1910, and, on that day, the property was adjudicated to John B. Patorno, a creditor of defendant. In the interval, the commercial firm of which Patorno was a member, alleging that the judgment was an unlawful preference under the bankrupt law, filed proceedings in the Federal Court as a creditor of the defendant, which culminated in its being adjudged a bankrupt on February 4, 1910.

On January 14, 1910, the United States District Court authorized Loisel, the marshal, as receiver of the bankrupt “to intervene in a suit pending or hereafter to be brought for the purpose of claiming said property or its proceeds.” '

On the same day the receiver filed an intervention in the instant case asking to be recognized as custodian of the. bankrupt’s assets and that the proceeds of the sale be transferred to him as receiver, and, on January 20th, he further took a rule on the sheriff, the purchaser and the seizing creditor to show cause why the proceeds of sale should not be delivered to him.

About the same time, Fleury took a rule against Patorno, the purchaser, to comply with the adjudication and pay the price to the sheriff. The respondent answered that, under the order of the United States District Court, the price should be paid to the marshal.

The lower Court held that the demand of the receiver was premature and ordered the price of adjudication to be paid to the sheriff and, from this judgment the marshal and Patorno have both appealed.

The ruling is correct.

The sheriff could not confirm the adjudication by passing the act of sale unless and until he had received the *420proceeds, and he is the officer designated by law to perform both functions.

May 16, 1910.

The receiver in bankruptcy has no greater right’ than any other litigant when he comes into a State court to assert his claim. He may not arrogate to himself the privilege of performing a function imposed by the State on the sheriff, that of receiving directly from the adjudicatee the proceeds of a sale made by the sheriff pursuant to law.

The property, after the sale, is no longer that of the bankrupt and the proceeds do not arise until payment to the sheriff upon execution of the act of sale.

The receivership will be amply protected by arresting the fund in the sheriff’s hands in the manner indicated by the Code of Practice, and this is evidently in the mind of the Federal Judge when he issues his order.

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14159]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Rescission of Order of 
Revocation

    Notice is hereby given that the Order revoking the following 
license is being rescinded by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant 
to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and 
the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean 
Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.
    License Number: 020700F.
    Name: Allen & Sally Associates, LLC dba USA Customs Brokers & 
Freight Forwarders.
    Address: 7094 Peachtree Industrial Blvd., Ste. 270-1, Norcross, GA 
30071.
    Order Published: FR: 05/13/09 (Volume 74, No. 91 Pg. 22551).

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. E9-14159 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**






Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
      and
      (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UNITED STATES Code)




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Zoom Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
      “Company”), does hereby certify that:




|(1) | The
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the
              “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
              section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
              and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The
              information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Dated:
                August 14, 2006**/s/
                Frank B. Manning**Frank
                B. ManningChief
                Executive Officer


30
EXHIBIT 99(b)

CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I,
David M. Tehle, Chief Financial Officer of Haggar Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the fiscal ended September 30, 2002, and
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. I
further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/ David M. TehleDavid M. Tehle
Date: January 28, 2003
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Number of Gaming Number of Gaming Number of Gaming Revenue

Operations Revenues Operations Revenues Operations Revenues Percentage

Portland 49 $2,763,647 50 $2,655,096 (1) $108,551 4.1%

Sacramento 63 $6,902,843 62 $6,794,012 1 $108,831 1.6%

Phoenix 48 $2,614,362 48 $2,538,617 0 $75,746 3.0%

St. Paul 119 $4,565,004 119 $4,451,539 0 $113,465 2.5%

Tulsa 64 $1,889,706 65 $1,769,493 (1) $120,213 6.8%

OK City 51 $1,702,409 51 $1,582,635 0 $119,774 7.6%

Washington DC 27 $6,715,837 27 $6,711,142 0 $4,695 0.1%

Totals 421 $27,153,807 422 $26,502,533 (1) $651,274 2.5%

Portland Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.

Sacramento California, and Northern Nevada

Phoenix Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Southern Nevada.

St. Paul Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska, South Dakota, Wisconsin and Wyoming

Tulsa Kansas, and Eastern Oklahoma.

OK City Western Oklahoma and Texas.

Washington DC Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and New York.

Source:  Compiled from gaming operation audited financial statements received by the NIGC through June 20, 2012.

National Indian Gaming Commission

Tribal Gaming Revenues (in thousands) by Region

Fiscal Year 2011 and 2010

Fiscal Year 2011 Fiscal Year 2010 Increase (decrease)
1 | P a g e

August 4, 2021 

NIGC Consultation Comments 

Re: 25 C.F.R. Parts 502, 556, & 558 

The Forest County Potawatomi Gaming Commission (FCPGC) appreciates the opportunity to 

provide comments on the proposed changes to 25 C.F.R. Parts 502, 556, and 558. The FCPGC 

is providing comments for the following sections: 

§502.14 Key employee means: 

(a) Any person, irrespective of employment status or compensation who performs 

one or more of the following functions: 

Comment: The FCPGC recommends change to the language to be read as follows: “irrespective 

of employment status within the tribe or compensation”. This change clearly identifies key 

employees as individuals employed by the Tribe who performs the identified functions including 

those individuals who are employed by the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Authority. 

§502.14 (a) (9) Custodian of gambling devices, gaming supplies, gaming systems, or cash; 

Comment: The FCPGC recommends delete cash and replace it with the words “gaming-related 

cash” or “gaming-related cash and cash equivalents”. This change clearly identifies individuals 

who are custodians of gaming related cash as a key employee and is consistent with the terms 

preceding it: gambling devices, gaming supplies, and gaming systems. 

§502.14 (b) Any person with unescorted access to secured areas; 

Comment: The FCPGC requests a clarification of the term “secured areas” and recommends the 

following language “Any person with unescorted access to areas of the facility that store or 

FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI 

GAMING COMMISSION 

618 State Highway 32 | Wabeno, WI 54566 | (715) 473-6774 | Fax: (715) 473-2001 

3136 W. Kilbourn Avenue | Milwaukee, WI 53208 | (414) 847-7699 | Fax: (414) 847-7729 
2 | P a g e

house gambling devices, gaming supplies, gaming systems, or gaming-related cash or cash 

equivalents” for consistency with §502.14 (a)(9). 

§502.19 (b) (3) To supervise a Key Employee.

Comment: The FCPGC appreciates the inclusion of this statement as it adds clarity to the 

identification of who primary management officials are. 

§558.3 (e) (1) The information listed under §556.4 (a)(1) through (14); 

 (2) Investigative reports, as defined in §556.6 (b); and 

 (3) Eligibility determinations, as defined in §556.5. 

Comment: The FCPGC appreciates the inclusion of the specific information required to be 

retained helps to prevent confusion regarding what specific information must, at a minimum, be 

obtained and retained for at least three years from the date of termination of work.