alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

IN THE MATTER OF THE 

RESIGNATION OF DOROTHY NASH 

HOLMES, BAR NO. 2057. 

No. 85279 

MED 

SEP 2 6 2022 

A. BROWN 

CLERK COURT 

BY 

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR RESIGNATION 

This is a joint petition by the State Bar of Nevada and attorney 

Dorothy Nash Holmes for her resignation from the Nevada bar. 

SCR 93(5) provides that Nevada attorneys who are not actively 

practicing law in this state may resign from the state bar if certain 

conditions are met. The petition includes statements from state bar staff 

confirming that no disciplinary, fee dispute arbitration, or client security 

fund matters are pending against Holmes; and that she is current on all 

membership fee payments and other financial commitments relating to her 

practice of law in this state. See SCR 93(5)(a)(1)-(2). 

Bar counsel has recommended that the resignation be 

approved, and the Board of Governors has approved the application for 

resignation. See SCR 93(5)(a)(2). Holmes acknowledges that her 

resignation is irrevocable and that the state bar retains continuing 

jurisdiction with respect to matters involving a past member's conduct prior 

to resignation. See SCR 93(5)(c)-(d). Finally, Holmes has submitted an 

affidavit of compliance with SCR 115. See SCR 93(5)(e). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A <441P1(4 

C IEF DEPUTY CLERK 

301q3 
The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 93(5). 

Accordingly, we approve attorney Dorothy Nash Holmes's resignation. SCR 

93(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted. 

It is so ORDERED. 

cc: Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada 

Dorothy Nash Holmes 

Executive Director 

Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 947A
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-51085 and 333-90824 of Arizona Public Service Company on Form S-3 and in
Registration Statement 333-46161 of Arizona Public Service Company on Form S-8
of our report dated February 3, 2003 (March 14, 26 and 27, 2003 as to Note 20)
(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to the change in 2001 in the method of accounting for
derivatives and hedging activities in order to comply with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Arizona Public Service Company for the year ended December 31, 2002.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona

March 27, 2003
97-582.

#### State ex rel. Isreal v. Rosmarin.

In Mandamus. On motion for judicial notice and on motion to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-51085 and 333-94277 of Arizona Public Service Company on Form S-3 and in
Registration Statement No. 333-46161 of Arizona Public Service Company on Form
S-8 of our report dated February 9, 2001, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Arizona Public Service Company for the year ended December 31,
2000.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona

March 12, 2001
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

June 27, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41028 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAVIER RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-01-CR-539-1

--------------------

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Javier Ramirez was convic ted for conspiracy and possession

with intent to distribute in excess of 100 kilograms of marijuana.

The district court made a two-level upward departure and sentenced

Ramirez to 121 months of imprisonment. R amirez has moved to

supplement the record with additional evidence indicating he was a

minor player in the drug conspiracy. But "[a]n appellate court may

not consider new evidence furnished for the first time on appeal.

. . . " Theriot v. Parish of Jefferson , 185 F.3d 477, 491 n.26No. 02-41028

-2-

(5th Cir. 1999) . Therefore, Ramirez’s motion to supplement the

record is DENIED.

On appeal, Ramirez first argues that the district court erred

in denying his request to remove a member of the venire for cause.

Because the prospective juror was not seated on the jury, Ramirez

has not shown that any reversible error arose from the district

c ourt’s decision not to strike this juror for cause. S ee United

States v. Martinez-Salazar , 528 U.S. 304, 306-07 (2000).

Ramirez also argues that the district court’s addition of two

levels to his sentencing score under § 3B1.1(c) was in error, as he

disputes the district court’s factual fin ding that he supervised

Charles Elizondo. Ramirez has not shown this finding was in clear

error, however, and therefore we will not vacate his sentence.

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 111 (Thursday, June 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27777-27778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13625]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1611]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 84, Houston, Texas, Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Port of Houston Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade 
Zone 84, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand 
its zone to include six additional sites (Sites 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, & 
22) in the Houston, Texas, area, adjacent to the Houston Customs and 
Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 49-2008, filed 9/10/08);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (73 FR 54556, 9/22/08), and the application has been processed 
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 84 is approved, subject to the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, subject to 
the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the overall 
general-purpose zone project, and further subject to a sunset provision 
that would terminate authority on May 31, 2014, for Sites 17, 18, 19, 
20, 21, & 22, where no activity has occurred under FTZ procedures 
before that date.

[[Page 27778]]

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of April 2009.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board/
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13625 Filed 6-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3089 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3089

 To require a study and report by the Office of Advocacy of the Small 
 Business Administration regarding the effects of proposed changes in 
                              patent law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2010

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require a study and report by the Office of Advocacy of the Small 
 Business Administration regarding the effects of proposed changes in 
                              patent law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT OF PATENT LAW CHANGES.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``Chief Counsel'' means the Chief Counsel for 
        Advocacy of the Small Business Administration; and
            (2) the term ``small business concern'' has the meaning 
        given that term under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 
        U.S.C. 632).
    (b) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Chief Counsel, in consultation with 
        the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, 
        shall conduct a study of the effects of changing from a first-
        to-invent to a first-to-file invention priority system under 
        patent law under title 35 of the United States Code.
            (2) Areas of study.--The study conducted under paragraph 
        (1) shall include examination of the effects of changing from a 
        first-to-invent to a first-to-file invention priority system, 
        including examining--
                    (A) how the change would affect the ability of 
                small business concerns to obtain patents;
                    (B) whether the change would create or exacerbate 
                any disadvantage for applicants for patents that are 
                small business concerns relative to applicants for 
                patents that are not small business concerns; and
                    (C) the costs and benefits to small business 
                concerns of the change.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Chief Counsel shall submit to the Committee on Small 
Business and Entrepreneurship and the Committee on the Judiciary of the 
Senate and the Committee on Small Business and the Committee on the 
Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report regarding the 
results of the study under subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Legal Services Corporation
 AGENCY: Legal Services Corporation.
 ACTION: Announcement of intention to make FY 2009 Competitive Grant Awards.
 SUMMARY: The Legal Services Corporation (LSC) hereby announces its intention to award grants and contracts to provide economical and effective delivery of high quality civil legal services to eligible low-income clients in Wyoming, beginning August 1, 2009.
 DATES: All comments and recommendations must be received on or before the close of business on July 13, 2009.
 ADDRESSES: Legal Services Corporation—Competitive Grants, Legal Services Corporation; 3333 K Street, NW., Third Floor; Washington, DC 20007.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Haley, Office of Program Performance, at (202) 295-1545, or 
                        *haleyr@lsc.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to LSC's announcement of funding availability on December 9, 2008 (73 FR 74756), LSC intends to award funds to the following organizations to provide civil legal services in the indicated service areas. Amounts are subject to change. State and service area
Applicant name
Annualized grant amountWyoming:WY-4
Center for Dispute Solutions, Inc
$527,007WY-4
Legal Aid of Wyoming, Inc
527,007NWY-1
Center for Dispute Solutions, Inc
184,660NWY-1
Legal Aid of Wyoming, Inc
184,660MWY
Center for Dispute Solutions, Inc
13,266MWY
Legal Aid of Wyoming, Inc
13,266
 These grants and contracts will be awarded under the authority conferred on LSC by the Legal Services Corporation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2996e(a)(1)). Awards will be made so that each service area is served, although none of the listed organizations are guaranteed an award or contract. This public notice is issued pursuant to the LSC Act (42 U.S.C. 2996f(f)), with a request for comments and recommendations concerning the potential grantees within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this notice. Grants will become effective and grant funds will be distributed on or about August 1, 2009. Dated: June 8, 2009. Janet LaBella, Director, Office of Program Performance, Legal Services Corporation.


[FR Doc. E9-13798 Filed 6-11-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3345 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3345

 To amend title 46, United States Code, to remove the cap on punitive 
 damages established by the Supreme Court in Exxon Shipping Company v. 
                                 Baker.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2010

 Mr. Whitehouse (for himself, Mr. Menendez, and Mr. Leahy) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 46, United States Code, to remove the cap on punitive 
 damages established by the Supreme Court in Exxon Shipping Company v. 
                                 Baker.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Big Oil Polluter Pays Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) in the case styled Exxon Shipping Co. v Baker, 128 S. 
        Ct. 2605 (2008), the Supreme Court held that when reviewing 
        jury awards for punitive damages under maritime law, courts 
        should limit the punitive-to-compensatory damages ratio to 1:1;
            (2) in that decision, the Court conceded that discretion to 
        award punitive damages has not mass-produced runaway awards, 
        and although some studies show the dollar amounts of punitive-
        damages awards growing over time, even in real terms, by most 
        accounts the median ratio of punitive-to-compensatory awards 
        has remained less than 1:1;
            (3) district and appellate courts have the authority under 
        common law to reduce excessively large punitive awards; and
            (4) punitive damages serve to punish reckless or worse 
        behavior, deter future similar offenses, and compensate for 
        intangible injuries that would not otherwise be available to 1 
        or more plaintiffs.

SEC. 3. REMOVAL OF CAP FOR MARITIME PUNITIVE DAMAGES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 301 of title 46, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 30107. Punitive damages in maritime law
    ``In a civil action for damages arising out of a maritime tort, 
punitive damages may be assessed without regard to the amount of 
compensatory damages assessed in the action.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The analysis for chapter 301 of title 
46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

``Sec. 30107. Punitive damages in maritime law.''.
                                 <all>
```
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
33-51085, 33-57822, 333-27551 and 333-58445 of Arizona Public Service Company on
Form S-3 and in Registration  Statement No.  333-46161 of Arizona Public Service
Company on Form S-8 of our report dated March 4, 1999,  appearing in this Annual
Report  on Form  10-K of  Arizona  Public  Service  Company  for the year  ended
December 31, 1998.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

March 26, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC. FOR THE SIX 
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            1545
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                       869
<INVENTORY>                                      2,292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,451
<PP&E>                                           8,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,754
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,949
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,998
<SALES>                                          9,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,637
<CGS>                                            5,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    793
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                793
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,441
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

        Inconnection with the quarterly report of Medical Technology Systems, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form10-Q”), I, Michael P. Conroy, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)              The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

(2)              The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
# Minimum Bankroll

# Instructions

# Class II

# Class III

# Look-up Tables
________________

BULLETIN

________________

No. 2017-02 June 1, 2017

Subject: 2017 Final Fee Rate and Fingerprint Fees

The National Indian Gaming Commission (Commission) has adopted its 2017 final annual fee rates of 

0.00% for tier 1 and 0.062% (.00062) for tier 2, which remain the same as the 2017 preliminary fee 

rates. The tier 2 annual fee rate maintains the lowest fee rate adopted by the Commission since 2010. 

These rates shall apply to all assessable gross revenues from each gaming operation under the 

jurisdiction of the Commission. If a tribe has a certificate of self-regulation under 25 CFR part 518, the 

2017 final fee rate on Class II revenues shall be 0.031% (.00031), which is one-half of the annual fee 

rate. 

The final fee rates being adopted here are effective June 1, 2017, and will remain in effect until new 

rates are adopted.

The NIGC has implemented an electronic payment system through Pay.gov in 2014. The system 

can be used for the quarterly payment of annual fees and submission of associated worksheets. 

Tribes interested in using the new Pay.gov electronic payment system should visit www.pay.gov

and select the NIGC using the tab Find an Agency. Additionally, tribes can visit the Commission’s 

website at www.nigc.gov for details on how to sign into the system, what information is required to 

be submitted and how to handle changes or corrections to submissions. Use of this system is 

optional and paper worksheets and fee payments by check will still be accepted. Please remit 

quarterly fee payments to:

National Indian Gaming Commission

Attn.: Division of Finance

1849 C Street NW

Mail Stop #1621

Washington, DC 20240

Pursuant to 25 CFR 514.4, please be sure to use the appropriate fiscal year as the base period for 

determining 2017 fee payments. Also, please provide the following identifying information: name, 

address, and telephone number of the gaming operation; name of licensing tribe; and the name,
telephone number, and email address of contact person. 

The National Indian Gaming Commission has also adopted its 2017 final fingerprint processing fees of 

$18 per card effective June 1, 2017. These fees remain the same as the 2017 preliminary fingerprint 

processing fees. 

Pursuant to 25 CFR part 514, the Commission regularly reviewsthe cost of processing fingerprint cards 

and sets a fee based on the amount charged by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and costs incurred by 

the Commission. Commission costs include Commission personnel, supplies, equipment costs, and 

postage to submit the results to the requesting tribe.

The announcement of 2017 final fee rate and fingerprint fees will be published in the Federal Register 

and the notice will be posted to the NIGC website as soon as it is available.

Should you have any questions, please contact Yvonne Lee, National Indian Gaming Commission, 

1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop #1621, Washington, DC 20240; telephone (202) 632-7003; fax (202) 

632-7066; email fee_questions@nigc.gov.
**Vehicles**

**For Agency Preparedness Review, you will need to have the following items available for review:**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**IF THE VEHICLE HAS AN EXTERNAL BULK FUEL TANK, COMPLETE CHECKLIST #22, FUEL TRANSPORT**

Checklist #18 - Vehicles	1	Revised June 2021

# image1.png