alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27381-27382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13400]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board (STB) publishes the names of 
the Persons selected to serve on its Senior Executive Service 
Performance Review Board (PRB).

[[Page 27382]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula Chandler, Director of Human 
Resources, (202) 245-0340.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 5 U.S.C. 4314 requires that each 
agency implement a performance appraisal system making senior 
executives accountable for organizational and individual goal 
accomplishment. As part of this system, 5 U.S.C. 4314(c) requires each 
agency to establish one or more PRBs, the function of which is to 
review and evaluate the initial appraisal of a senior executive's 
performance by the supervisor and to make recommendations to the final 
rating authority relative to the performance of the senior executive.
    The persons named below have been selected to serve on STB's PRB.

Leland L. Gardner, Director, Office of Economics, Environmental 
Analysis and Administration.
Matthew T. Wallen, Director, Office Public Assistance, Governmental 
Affairs, and Enforcement.
Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings.
Ellen D. Hanson, General Counsel.

    Dated: June 2, 2009.
Andrea Pope-Matheson,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9-13400 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3179 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to designate certain medical facilities 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs as health professional shortage 

areas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2010 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to designate certain 

medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

as health professional shortage areas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Access to 

5 Care Act’’. 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3179 IS

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF MEDICAL FACILITIES OF THE DE2 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AS 

3 HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SHORTAGE AREAS. 

4 (a) PHSA.—Section 332(a)(1) of the Public Health 

5 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254e(a)(1)) is amended in the sec6 ond sentence by inserting ‘‘and medical facilities of the 

7 Department of Veterans Affairs (including State homes, 

8 as defined in section 101(19) of title 38, United States 

9 Code)’’ after ‘‘(42 U.S.C. 1395x(aa)),’’. 

10 (b) CONCURRENT BENEFITS.— 

11 (1) SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM.—Section 338A(b) 

12 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l(b)) 

13 is amended— 

14 (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

15 (B) in paragraph (4), by striking the pe16 riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

17 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

18 paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(5) not be participating in the Department of 

20 Veterans Affairs Health Professionals Educational 

21 Assistance Program under chapter 76 of title 38, 

22 United States Code.’’. 

23 (2) DEBT REDUCTION PROGRAM.—Section 

24 338B(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

25 U.S.C. 254l–1(b)) is amended— 

26 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’; 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3179 IS

1 (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the pe2 riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(4) not be participating in the Department of 

6 Veterans Affairs Health Professionals Educational 

7 Assistance Program under chapter 76 of title 38, 

8 United States Code.’’. 

9 (c) CONSULTATION.—In carrying out the National 

10 Health Service Corps Program under subpart II of part 

11 D of title III of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 254d et seq.), the Secretary of Health and Human Serv13 ices shall consult with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

14 with respect to health professional shortage areas that are 

15 medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

16 (including State homes, as defined in section 101(19) of 

17 title 38, United States Code). 

18 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall take effect on the date that is 90 days 

20 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 113 (Monday, June 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13892]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,795]


Caye Upholstery, Amory, MS; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 15, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by workers of Caye Upholstery, Amory, Mississippi.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of May 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13892 Filed 6-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Michael D. Dale, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ATS Medical,Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for , the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluations, and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affectedor is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors;
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any Fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.
Date: May 10, 2004    /s/ Michael D. Dale   Name: Michael D. DaleTitle: Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          75,424
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,624
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (533)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,091
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,668
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,337)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.74)
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-2900

___________

Randall T. McArty, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Appeal from the United States

Department of Correction; * District Court for the Eastern

Ray Hobbs, Deputy Director, * District of Arkansas.

Arkansas Department of Correction; *

M. D. Reed, Warden, Cummins Unit, * [UNPUBLISHED]

ADC; J. Hipple, Assistant Warden, *

Cummins Unit, ADC; L. Herring, Lt., *

Cummins Unit, ADC; W. Ashcraft, *

Sgt., Cummins Unit, ADC, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: November 30, 2001

Filed: December 3, 2001

___________

Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
*

The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District

of Arkansas.

-2-

Arkansas inmate Randall T. McArty appeals the district court's*

 denial of

McArty's motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against

Arkansas correction staff. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties'

briefs, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion or suffer any

misconception preventing a genuine application of its discretion to all facets of the

case. See Dakota Indus., Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc., 988 F.2d 61, 63 (8th Cir.

1993). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 15 (Monday, January 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1400]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES

Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules of 
Criminal Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Criminal Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure will 
hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation 
but not participation.

DATES: April 6-7, 2009.

Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus 
Circle, NE., Washington, DC 20054.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: January 5, 2009.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. E9-1400 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3266 

To ensure the availability of loan guarantees for rural homeowners. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2010 

Mr. BENNET introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To ensure the availability of loan guarantees for rural 

homeowners. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Housing Preser5 vation and Stabilization Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LOAN GUARANTEE FEES. 

7 (a) FEES.— 

8 (1) UP-FRONT FEES.—Paragraph (8) of section 

9 502(h) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 

10 1472(h)(8)) is amended to read as follows: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3266 IS

1 ‘‘(8) GUARANTEE FEES.—With respect to a 

2 guaranteed loan under this subsection, the Secretary 

3 may collect from the lender, at the time of issuance 

4 of the guarantee, a fee equal to not more than 4.05 

5 percent of the principal obligation of the loan, as de6 termined sufficient by the Secretary to cover the 

7 costs (as such term is defined in section 502 of the 

8 Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 

9 661a)) of loan guarantees under this subsection.’’. 

10 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 739 

11 of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and 

12 Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appro13 priation Act, 2001 (as enacted by Public Law 106– 

14 387; 114 Stat. 1549A–34) is hereby repealed. 

15 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNT OF LOAN GUARAN16 TEES.—Section 513 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 

17 U.S.C. 1483) is amended by adding at the end the fol18 lowing new subsection: 

19 ‘‘(f) AUTHORIZATION FOR LOAN GUARANTEES.—The 

20 Secretary may, to the extent approved in appropriation 

21 Acts, guarantee loans under section 502(h) in aggregate 

22 amounts not to exceed $30,000,000,000 for fiscal year 

23 2010.’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3266 IS

1 SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

2 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

3 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go-Act of 2010, 

4 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

5 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

6 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

7 by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the 

8 House of Representatives, provided that such statement 

9 has been submitted prior to the vote on passage. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131347 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131347 

 COA: 254523 

Wayne CC: 03-003196-02

DERAY JEROME SMITH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 11, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
# Bandag, Incorporated

EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

The Company
has the following subsidiaries including significant subsidiaries as defined in Regulation
S-X, each incorporated in the jurisdiction stated opposite its name. All of the following
subsidiaries are 100% owned by the Company. The Company has additional subsidiaries,
which, if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a
significant subsidiary as such term is defined in Regulation S-X.

|Name of Subsidiary                                | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Bandag A.G                                        | Switzerland                  
|Bandag Canada Ltd.                                | Canada                       
|Bandag Europe N.V                                 | Belgium                      
|Bandag Licensing Corporation                      | Iowa                         
|Bandag Incorporated of S.A. (Proprietary) Limited | South Africa                 
|Bandag do Brasil Ltda                             | Brazil                       
|Bandag B.V                                        | Netherlands                  
|Bandag de Mexico, S.A. de C.V                     | Mexico                       
|Quality Design Systems, Inc.                      | Iowa                         
|Tire Distribution Systems, Inc.                   | Delaware                     
|Tire Management Solutions, Inc.                   | Iowa
Exhibit 32(c)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,



|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.









|/s/ Hugh T. McDonaldHugh T. McDonald
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer 
of Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	March 1, 2007
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3089 

To require a study and report by the Office of Advocacy of the Small 

Business Administration regarding the effects of proposed changes in 

patent law. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2010 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To require a study and report by the Office of Advocacy 

of the Small Business Administration regarding the effects of proposed changes in patent law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT OF PATENT LAW 

4 CHANGES. 

5 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

6 (1) the term ‘‘Chief Counsel’’ means the Chief 

7 Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Admin8 istration; and 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3089 IS

1 (2) the term ‘‘small business concern’’ has the 

2 meaning given that term under section 3 of the 

3 Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632). 

4 (b) STUDY.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Chief Counsel, in con6 sultation with the Director of the United States Pat7 ent and Trademark Office, shall conduct a study of 

8 the effects of changing from a first-to-invent to a 

9 first-to-file invention priority system under patent 

10 law under title 35 of the United States Code. 

11 (2) AREAS OF STUDY.—The study conducted 

12 under paragraph (1) shall include examination of the 

13 effects of changing from a first-to-invent to a first14 to-file invention priority system, including exam15 ining— 

16 (A) how the change would affect the ability 

17 of small business concerns to obtain patents; 

18 (B) whether the change would create or ex19 acerbate any disadvantage for applicants for 

20 patents that are small business concerns rel21 ative to applicants for patents that are not 

22 small business concerns; and 

23 (C) the costs and benefits to small busi24 ness concerns of the change. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3089 IS

1 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the 

2 date of enactment of this Act, the Chief Counsel shall sub3 mit to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepre4 neurship and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Sen5 ate and the Committee on Small Business and the Com6 mittee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives 

7 a report regarding the results of the study under sub8 section (b). 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          (6726)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          501259
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (7661)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  486872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           627641
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      20000
<COMMON>                                        872432
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1033201)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    486872
<SALES>                                           2812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2812
<CGS>                                             1299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 16033
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 671
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15191)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>