alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| 1.   | I have reviewed the small business issuer's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 (this "report"); |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       | Applied Minerals, Inc. |
|---------------------------------|------------------------|
|                            |                   |   |
| Date:  March 29, 2010 | By:                    | /s/ ANDRE ZEITOUN |
|                            |                   | Andre Zeitoun |
|                            |                   | Chief Executive Officer |

----
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

July 13, 2016

CONTACT

Sarah_Beccio@NIGC.gov

(202) 632-7003

MEDIA ADVISORY

National Indian Gaming Commission to Announce 2015 Gross Gaming Revenues

WASHINGTON, DC– The National Indian Gaming Commission will hold a press conference to 

announce the Indian gaming industry’s 2015 gross gaming revenues. 

WHO: NIGC Chair Jonodev O. Chaudhuri

NIGC Vice Chair Kathryn Isom-Clause

NIGC Associate Commissioner E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Director of Public Affairs Sarah Beccio

Director of Finance Yvonne Lee 

WHEN: Tuesday, July 19, 2016, 11 a.m. PDT.

WHERE: Fantasy Springs Resort Casino 

84-245 Indio Springs Parkway 

Indio, CA 92203-3499 

NOTE: Press must RSVP by Monday, July 18, 2016, by 12:00 PM EDT 

Mark_Gaston@NIGC.Gov

Credentialed Press must wear badges at all times.

###

The National Indian Gaming Commission is an independent regulatory agency established within the Department of the Interior 

pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          The  consolidated  balance  sheet  as  of  August  31,  1999  and  the
consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended August 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000823975
<NAME>                        Columbus Energy Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                          1,403
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,690
<ALLOWANCES>                                      116
<INVENTORY>                                       102
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,273
<PP&E>                                         39,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                 21,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 22,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,806
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          929
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   22,431
<SALES>                                         7,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                8,159
<CGS>                                           2,098
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    4
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (70)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (27)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (43)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (43)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements  contained in the  Registrant's  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1999,  and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               4,189
<SECURITIES>                                        12,470
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    16,659
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      16,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               39,007
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               312
<OTHER-SE>                                         917,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        16,659
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       173
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    16,040
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (15,867)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (15,867)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (15,867)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0)



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Kaytlin TT., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Cortland County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Betty SS., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) (And Two Other Related Proceedings.)

Submitted October 15, 2012;

decided December 13, 2012

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*13 NY3d 709 (2009)].
The Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation

P.O. Box 150, Nespelem, WA 99155 (509) 634-2200
OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN FAX: (509) 634-4116

July 5, 2011

National Indian Gaming Commission
1440 L. Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20004

Att: Lael Echo Hawk

Dear Commissioners:

On behalf of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, we wish to convey our support
for the proposed revisions to Parts 543 and 547 of the NIGC’s regulations recently submitted for
your consideration by the Tribal Gaming Working Group (TGWG). Additionally, we wish to
extend our utmost appreciation to the Chair and members of the Commission for their willing to
re-examine the NIGC’s regulations, particularly in this instance, the Class II regulations.

Class II gaming is extremely important to all of Indian Country, which has played a key role in
its development and success. We applaud the Commission for reaching out and seeking tribal
input as to how best regulate Class II gaming technology in a manner that ensures integrity in
Class II technology without compromising the authority and primacy of tribal gaming regulatory
agencies. Indian Country assembled a working group with a high level of expertise in from
various sectors of the tribal gaming industry with the broad base of knowledge needed to assist
the NIGC in developing regulations consistent with its oversight function without compromising
the regulatory framework intended in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. We are confident that
the revisions to Parts 543 and 547 proposed by the TGWG provide a strong foundation for
government-to-government consultation by the NIGC and tribal governments concerning Class
II gaming.

Accordingly, we urge the Commission to give favorable consideration to the revisions as
proposed by the TGWG and begin consultation with tribal governments on the proposed Class II
regulatory revisions with a goal to timely adopt revised Class II regulations.

Sincerely,

WhLO.F

Michael O. Finley
Chairman, Colville Business Council

WS Zity oz

NOs
NVIO

JO
#### In the Matter of Walter Adelman, Appellant, v Michael A. Gary, Respondent.

Submitted October 22, 2012;

decided December 13, 2012

Motion for reargument denied *[see*19 NY3d 1003 (2012)].
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on April 14, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Sensory System for Critical Infrastructure Defect Recognition, Visualization and Failure Prediction (“Sensory System”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: ELXSI, Orlando, FL; Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA; and Beyond Vision, LLC, Ruston, LA. The general area of Sensory System's planned activity is to develop a novel, deep-penetrating scanning system based on ultrawideband radar for inspecting buried infrastructure such as pipelines, tunnels, and culverts that can detect fractures, quantify corrosion and determine the presence of voids in the surrounding soil to “see” beyond the structure to prevent accidents. The technology provides analysis which cannot be detected by current pipe inspection. The sensory system would be used by dull engineers to rehabilitate and replace critical non-conductive infrastructure such as concrete bridges, concrete dams, sea walls, highways, runways and non-ferrous pipelines. The activities of this joint venture project will be partially funded by award #7ONANB9H9009 from the Technology Innovation Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce.

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. E9-13928 Filed 6-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### In re Alex WATHEN, Debtor, Alex Wathen, Appellant, v. Rick A. Yarnall, Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellee, Haines & Krieger, LLC, In re Francisco J. Martinez, Debtor, Francisco J. Martinez, Appellant, v. Rick A. Yarnall, Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellee, Haines & Krieger, LLC, In re Melissa J. Stine, Debtor, Melissa J. Stine, Appellant, v. Rick A. Yarnall, Appellee, Haines & Krieger, LLC.

Nos. 09-60043, 09-60044, 09-60045.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 8, 2010.*

Filed Jan. 3, 2011.

*14Christopher P. Burke, Chris P. Burke & Associates, George Haines, Esquire, Haines *&*Krieger, LLC, Las Vegas, NV, for Debtor.

Marianne Gatti, Esquire, Senior Staff, Las Vegas, NV, for Appellee.

Rick A. Yarnall, pro se.

Before: REINHARDT, HAWKINS, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for disposition without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER**

The Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) decided this case on October 5, 2009. On January 25, 2010, the bankruptcy courts dismissed the bankruptcies of Appellants Alex Wathen and Francisco Martinez for reasons unrelated to this appeal. This court lacks jurisdiction to decide appeals that become moot by the intervening dismissal of the underlying bankruptcy. *See In re Pattullo,*271 F.3d 898, 901 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, the appeals for Wathen and Martinez are DISMISSED.

Additionally, although Appellant Melissa Stine received ample notice of the proceedings before the BAP, she failed to appear and participate in the resolution of that appeal. Under *In re Commercial W. Fin. Corp.,*761 F.2d 1329, 1335 (9th Cir.1985), an appellant lacks standing to challenge a decision rendered without her participation or objection, *see id.*(“attendance and objection” at the prior proceedings are “prerequisites” for standing to appeal). Accordingly, Ms. Stine’s appeal is DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31(b)

CERTIFICATIONS

** 
I, Leo P. Denault, certify that:  
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Entergy Corporation;  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:   
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   
b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;   
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

		/s/ Leo P. Denault 			

**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              24
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      636
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         21
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   979
<PP&E>                                           5,614
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,078
<BONDS>                                          1,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        300
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,008
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,021
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  77
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    229
<INCOME-TAX>                                        71
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                158
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                         (13)
<NET-INCOME>                                       145
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>Not separately identified in the Consolidated Financial Statements or
accompanying notes thereto.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,506-01

IN RE LEEROY CESAR CARBALLO, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1097497-A IN THE 179 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. He contends that he mailed an “amended/supplemented application for

writ of habeas corpus” in November 2013, and has received no confirmation that the District Clerk 1

filed the documents. 

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. The Respondent, the District Clerk of 

Harris County, is ordered to file a response, addressing whetherthey received Applicant’s pleadings,

 It appears that the original writ filed is still pending under authority of an order 1

designating issues signed on October 20, 2011. 
2

and, if so, stating whether they were filed. If the pleadings were received and filed, the District

Clerk’s response shall include proof establishing the date of filing. If the pleadings were received

but not filed, the District Clerk shall detail its rationale for not filing them. 

This motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until the

Respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30

days of the date of this order.

Filed: July 29, 2015

Do not publish