alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3448 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to permit 

certain service institutions in all States to provide year-round services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 27 (legislative day, MAY 26), 2010 

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to permit certain service institutions in all States 

to provide year-round services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring All Students 

5 Year-round (EASY) Access to Meals and Snacks Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. YEAR-ROUND SERVICES FOR ELIGIBLE ENTITIES. 

7 Section 13(a) of the Richard B. Russell National 

8 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1761(a)) is amended by add9 ing at the end the following— 

10 ‘‘(11) YEAR-ROUND OPTION.— 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3448 IS

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 

2 subparagraph (B), a service institution that is 

3 described in paragraph (6) (excluding a public 

4 school), or a private nonprofit organization de5 scribed in paragraph (7), shall be eligible for 

6 the program under the same terms and condi7 tions as other service institutions. 

8 ‘‘(B) REIMBURSEMENT EXCEPTION.—A 

9 service institution described in subparagraph 

10 (A), in addition to being eligible for reimburse11 ment for meals described in subsection (b)(2) 

12 served during each day of operation during the 

13 periods described in subsection (c)(1), may be 

14 reimbursed for up to 1 meal and 1 snack per 

15 child served during each day of operation dur16 ing— 

17 ‘‘(i) after school hours; 

18 ‘‘(ii) weekends; and 

19 ‘‘(iii) school holidays during the reg20 ular school calendar.’’. 

21 SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENT. 

22 Section 18 of the Richard B. Russell National School 

23 Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1769) is amended by striking sub24 section (h). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3279 

To reauthorize the national small business tree planting program, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2010 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. SPECTER, Mrs. 

HAGAN, and Mr. HARKIN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the national small business tree planting 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Envi5 ronmental Stewardship Assistance Act of 2010’’. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3279 IS

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(e)’’; 

2 (2) by striking ‘‘year 1991 and’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘year 1991,’’; 

4 (3) by inserting after ‘‘through 1997,’’ the fol5 lowing: ‘‘and $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

6 2011 through 2015,’’; and 

7 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(2)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B)— 

9 ‘‘(i) the Administrator may use amounts made 

10 available for the program under this section for ad11 ministrative costs relating to the program; and 

12 ‘‘(ii) a State receiving amounts under a grant 

13 or contract under this section may use a percentage, 

14 as determined by the Administrator, of the amounts 

15 for administrative costs relating to the grant or con16 tract. 

17 ‘‘(B) The total of all amounts used for administrative 

18 costs under subparagraph (A) during a fiscal year may 

19 not exceed the amount equal to 20 percent of the amount 

20 made available for the program under this section for the 

21 fiscal year.’’. 

22 (b) RULES AND REGULATIONS.—Section 24(f) of the 

23 Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 651(f)) is amended— 

24 (1) by striking ‘‘date of enactment of this sec25 tion’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘date of 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3279 IS

1 enactment of the Small Business Environmental 

2 Stewardship Assistance Act of 2010’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘the administration’’ and insert4 ing ‘‘the Administrator’’. 

5 (c) ANNUAL REPORT TO PRESIDENT AND CON6 GRESS.—Section 24(h) of the Small Business Act (15 

7 U.S.C. 651(h)) is amended by striking ‘‘The Adminis8 trator shall submit annually’’ and inserting ‘‘Not later 

9 than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Small Busi10 ness Environmental Stewardship Assistance Act of 2010, 

11 and annually thereafter, the Administrator shall submit’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.4735
<CASH>                                              72
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       52
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         67
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   196
<PP&E>                                            1436
<DEPRECIATION>                                     469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              110
<BONDS>                                           1193
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         16
<COMMON>                                           641
<OTHER-SE>                                       (790)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1316
<SALES>                                            271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   302
<CGS>                                              224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (3)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  57
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (22)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (23)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (23)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3472 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3472

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to require oil polluters to pay 
          the full cost of oil spills, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 9, 2010

 Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. 
     Schumer, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mrs. 
  Gillibrand, Mr. Kaufman, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Reed, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. 
Feingold, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Casey, Mr. Leahy, Ms. Mikulski, 
Mr. Franken, Mr. Harkin, Ms. Klobuchar, Mrs. Shaheen, and Ms. Stabenow) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to require oil polluters to pay 
          the full cost of oil spills, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Big Oil Bailout Prevention Unlimited 
Liability Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF LIMITS ON LIABILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1004(a)(3) of the Oil Pollution Act of 
1990 (33 U.S.C. 2704(a)(3)) is amended by striking ``plus $75,000,000'' 
and inserting ``and the liability of the responsible party under 
section 1002''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section takes 
effect on April 15, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

The
Company has the following subsidiaries including significant subsidiaries as defined in
Regulation S-X, each incorporated in the jurisdiction stated opposite its name. All of the
following subsidiaries are 100% owned by the Company with the exception of Speedco, Inc.
which is 87.5% owned. The Company has additional subsidiaries, which, if considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant
subsidiary as such term is defined in Regulation S-X.

|Name of Subsidiary              | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Bandag A.G.                     | Switzerland                  
|Bandag Canada Ltd.              | Canada                       
|Bandag Europe N.V.              | Belgium                      
|Bandag do Brasil Ltda           | Brazil                       
|Bandag B.V.                     | Netherlands                  
|Bandag de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.  | Mexico                       
|Open Road Technologies, Inc.    | Iowa                         
|Speedco, Inc.                   | Indiana                      
|Tire Distribution Systems, Inc. | Delaware
Via Facsimile and U.S. Mail 

August 9,2012 

W. Charles Ulrey, Jr., Director of Development 

Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma 

P.O. Box 110 

Miami, OK 74355 

Fax: (91 8) 542-32 14 

Re: Indian Lands Legal Opinion 

Dear Director Ulrey: 

Thank you for your letter dated December 2 1,20 1 1, requesting an Indian lands opinion from the 

National hdian Gaming Commission Office of General Counsel regarding two parcels of land as 

follows: Lots 3 1 and 32, Block 11 7, City of Miami, Original Plat, Ottawa County, Oklahoma, 

and Lots 1,2,3, and 4, Block 125, City of Miami, Ottawa County, Oklahoma. 

You provided copies of trust deeds for both properties and letters from BL4 confirming the 

parcels are within the Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma's (Tribe) farmer reservation. We have 

reviewed the submission and the Bureau of Indian Affairs confirmed that the parcels are in trust 

for the Tribe and within the Tribe's former reservation in Oklahoma as defined by the Secretary. 

Therefore, the parcels are Indian lands eligible for gaming as trust lands over which the Tribe 

exercises governmental power. See 25 U.S .C . $2703(4). Although the trust deeds are dated 

July 1 5,2004, and August 1 7,2004, the parcels are not subject IGRA's prohibition on gaming on 

trust lands acquired after October 17,1988, because they are within the boundaries of the Tribe's 

former reservation in Oklahoma as defined by the Secretary. See 25 U.S .C . $27 1 9(a)(2)(A)(i). 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 202-632-7003. 

Sincerely, 

Associate General ~ounkl 
To:
Exhibit 32(d)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
E. Follin Smith, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(i)    The
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   The
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Baltimore Gas and Electric
Company.

|/s/E. FOLLIN SMITH                                                |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|E. Follin Smith
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

Date:
March 11, 2005

---



QuickLinks
---

EXHIBIT 99b

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen Spoonamore, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB for the period ended
December 31, 2002 of Arbor, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
  that material information relating to the registrant, including its
  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
  entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
  prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
  registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days
  prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and (c) Presented in this report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
  evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
  internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
  record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
  the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
  management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
  internal controls; and


6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Date: May 1, 2003 | _______________________
    Stephen Spoonamore, Acting Chief Financial Officer
|----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* Provide a separate certification for each principal
executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant. See Rules
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).
Exhibit 10.1
THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE
This is a Third Amendment to Lease dated as of May 16, 2022 by and between Bulfinch Square Limited Partnership, a Massachusetts limited partnership (“Landlord”) and Leap Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Tenant”).
WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated November 13, 2018, as amended by First Amendment to Lease dated August 17, 2021 and Second Amendment to Lease dated as of October 1, 2021 (as so amended, the “Lease”) with respect to certain premises at 47 Thorndike Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts; and
WHEREAS, Tenant wishes to extend the term of the Lease until July 31, 2024 from its current expiration of January 31, 2023; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1.Capitalized terms used herein without definition, including in the foregoing recitals, shall have the meanings ascribed to them by the Lease.
2.The Original Term shall be extended to expire on July 31, 2024. The date by which Tenant must elect whether to exercise its option to extend the term of the Lease for the Extended Term shall be November 30, 2023.
3.Annual Fixed Rent for the period of February 2023 through July 2024 shall be $452,353.00 per annum (i.e. $37,696.08 for each month) through January 2024, and $460,020.00 per annum (i.e. $38,335.00 per month) for the period of February 2024 through July 31, 2024.
4.Tenant warrants and represents that it has dealt with no broker in connection with this Third Amendment to Lease, and that in the event of any brokerage claims or liens against Landlord or the Property predicated on dealings with Tenant, Tenant agrees to defend the same and to indemnify and hold Landlord harmless from any such claim and to discharge any such lien.
5.Except as herein amended the Lease is ratified and affirmed.

​



-2-
​

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this Third Amendment to Lease as of the date first set forth above.
	​
	LANDLORD:

	​
	​

	​
	Bulfinch Square Limited Partnership

	​
	​

	​
	By:
	Courthouse Associates, Inc., its general partner

	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	By:
	/s/ Kenneth Krozy

	​
	​
	​
	Kenneth Krozy

	​
	​
	​
	Vice President



​
	​
	TENANT:

	​
	​

	​
	Leap Therapeutics, Inc.

	​
	​

	​
	By:
	/s/ Douglas E. Onsi

	​
	​
	Name:
	Douglas E. Onsi

	​
	​
	Title:
	President & CEO



​
94-2303.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. McDonald.

IT IS ORDERED by this court, *sua sponte,*effective May 7, 1997, that Michael J. McDonald, Attorney Registration No. 0022740, last known address in Miamisburg, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of March 29, 1995, to wit: failure to pay publication costs in the amount of $171.39 on or before October 12,1995.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RAYMOND A. ATUGUBA, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3782

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Respondent. )

)

Opinion filed April 10, 2019.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the

Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; 

Martha J. Cook, Judge.

Raymond A. Atuguba, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Katie Salemi Ashby, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for

Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Denied. 

SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3305 

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to require oil polluters to pay 

the full cost of oil spills, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2010 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. 

CARDIN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to require oil polluters to pay the full cost of oil spills, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Big Oil Bailout Pre5 vention Liability Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITS ON LIABILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES. 

7 Section 1004(a)(3) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 

8 (33 U.S.C. 2704(a)(3)) is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘$75,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000,000’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3305 IS

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 This Act and the amendments made by this Act take 

3 effect on April 15, 2010. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of China Granite Corporation a Nevada
corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31,
2003,  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"), Dong Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the  best  of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  ss.  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the  Company.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  China  Granite  Corporation, and will be retained by China Granite
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon  request.


/s/ Dong Chen
--------------------------
Dong Chen
Chief Executive Officer
August 3, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maria T. Kinalis, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 400]

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Honorof, J.), rendered February 15, 2012, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that she violated a condition thereof, upon her admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous convictions of aggravated unlicensed operation of a

*740motor vehicle in the second degree and aggravated driving while intoxicated.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review her contention that her admissions to violating conditions of her probation were not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made *(see People v Reyes,*98 AD3d 1140, 1141 [2012]; *People v Guzzardo,*87 AD3d 1160, 1161 [2011]; *People v Decker,*83 AD3d 731, 732 [2011]; *People v Emery,*40 AD3d 1009, 1010 [2007]; *People v Alvarez,*26 AD3d 442, 442-443 [2006]). Furthermore, the “rare case” exception to the preservation requirement does not apply here because the defendant’s allocution did not call into question the voluntariness of her admission *(People v McNair,*13 NY3d 821, 822 [2009] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]). In any event, the defendant’s contention that she did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently admit that she violated the conditions of her probation is without merit *(see generally People v Reyes,*98 AD3d at 1141; *People v Decker,*83 AD3d at 732; *accord Marshall v Lonherger,*459 US 422, 437-438 [1983]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit. Dickerson, J.E, Chambers, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.