alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bonnie G. Scudero 

Chairman 

Metlakatla Indian Gaming Commission 

P.O. Box 216 

Metlakatla, Alaska 99926 

Re: Game Classification Opinion - "Raffles" 

Dear Ms. Scudero: 

The purpose of this letter is to respond to yours of November 13, 1998, in which you request 

the National Lndian Gaming Commission ("NIGC) to issue an advisory opinion on whether "raffles" 

constitute class I1 or class I11 gaming, as defined by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act ("IGRA"), 

25 U.S.C. fj 2701, et seq. For the reasons outlined below, we conclude that raffles qualify as class 

111 gaming. 

IGRA creates three classes of gaming which differ in the degree of tribal, state, and federal 

oversight. Class I gaming consists of "social games [played] solely for prizes of minimal value or 

traditional forms of Indian gaming engaged in by individuals as part of, or in connection with, tribal 

ceremonies or celebrations." 25 U.S.C. $2703(6). Class I garning is within the exclusive jurisdiction 

of Indian tribes and is not subject to state or federal regulation. 25 U.S.C. $ 2710(a)(l). Class I1 

gaming primarily consists of "the game of chance commonly known as bingo including pull-tabs, 

lotto, punch boards, tip jars, instant bingo, and other games similar to bingo." 25 U.S.C. Cj 

2703(7)(A). Class I1 gaming is generally not subject to state regulation, but is subject to federal 

oversight by the NIGC. 25 U.S.C. 5 2710(a)(2). Class 111 gaming is defined residually; it includes 

"all forms ofgaming that are not class I gaming or class I1 garning." 25 U.S.C. § 2703(8). Class 111 

gaming "includes such things as slot machines, casino games, banking card games, dog racing, and 

lotteries." 25 C.F.R. 3 502.4. Class I11 saming is lawfbl on Indian lands only if it is authorized by a 

tribal ordinance approved by the NIGC. permitted by the state for some person or organization, and 

covered by a tribal-state compact. 25 U.S.C. S 2710(d)(l). 

Raffles do not qualify as either class I or class 11 gaming. Therefore, raffles constitute class 

111 gamins, as class 111 gaming includes "all forms of garning that are not class I gaming or class 11 

gaming." 25 U.S.C. fj 2703(8). 

It is important to note that the I~Ietlakatla Indian Community does not have a compact with 

%~d the State of Alaska for class 111 gamins activities, and therefore, cannot lawfblly offer raffles at its 

1441 L STREET, N.W. 9TH FLOOR WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 EL.: 202-632-7003 FAX. 202-632-7066 
4lW1' 

gaming facility. If you have any hrther questions regarding this matter, please call Todd J Araujo 

at (202) 632-7003 

Sincerely, 

Penny J. Coleman 

Deputy General Counsel
#### QUICKVIEW SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BELO INTERACTIVE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2006-1091.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 14, 2006.

*ORDER*

Quickview Systems Incorporated moves without opposition to reinstate this appeal.

On July 31, 2006, this court dismissed this appeal without prejudice to reinstatement if the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas entered a final judgment within 30 days and Quick-view filed another timely notice of appeal thereafter. Quickview states that the district court entered a final judgment on August 14, 2006 and that Quickview filed another notice of appeal on August 17, 2006.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The mandate is recalled, the dismissal order is vacated, and the appeal is reinstated.

(2) Because the briefs were previously filed, the case may now be assigned to an oral argument calendar. Copies of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
BALANCE SHEET.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 824134
<NAME> FFCA INVESTOR SERVICES CORPORATION 88-B
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
From: Walt Fales

To: Doulou, Vannice C.

Subject: NEPA Management Contracts

Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 5:20:18 PM

Importance: High

Dear Ms. Doulou:

I am Walt Fales, Chief Development Officer for Warner Hospitality and Warner Gaming. Our

 affiliated companies manage tribal gaming facilities for the Mescalero Apache Tribe of New Mexico

 and the Spokane Tribe of Indians of Washington under NIGC-approved management agreements

 (and currently have another management agreement before the NIGC for the Fort Mojave Indian

 Tribe of Nevada and Arizona).

I support your proposed change regarding the application of categorical exclusions to management

 agreements. I do not view IGRA as requiring NEPA analysis for the review and approval of gaming

 management agreements. I believe that this categorical exemption would benefit Indian Tribes

 greatly, in that it would facilitate economic development, and help tribes avoid millions of dollars in

 expenses and years in delay in development of their gaming projects.

Thank you,

Walt Fales

Walter D. Fales | Chief Development Officer

WARNER HOSPITALITY

m. 702.302.6820 | o. 702.871.7700

6720 Via Austi Parkway | Suite 400

Las Vegas, NV 89119

WarnerHospitality.com

CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and

 intended solely for the use of the person(s) to whom they are addressed. If you are not the

 named addressee, you must not disclose, copy, print, distribute, take any action or rely on it

 and should notify the sender by reply. If you have received this message in error, please

 notify me immediately.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-1224

LT Case No. 2021-CF-3675

_____________________________

BRANDON JAMES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, 

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

November 7, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, JAY, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TENET HOSPITALS LIMI TED, A

TEXAS LIMITED PARTNE RSHIP,

D/B/A/ SIERRA MEDICA L CENTER

,

Appellant,

v.

MARIVA J. BARAJAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00048

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2013

- DCV1930)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in that

part of the judgment overruling the objections to Nurse Holguin’s and Dr. Allen’s reports on the

basis of their respective qualifications. We therefore reverse the tri al court’s judgment as to

Nurse Holguin ’s and Dr. Allen’s expert report s and remand the case to the trial court for

proceeding s consistent with this opinion . The judgment of the court below is affirmed as it

pertains to the expert report of Dr. Arredondo.

We further order that Appellant, and its sureties, if any, s ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.5, and

Appellee each pay one

- half (1/2) the costs of this appeal. This decision shall be certified below

for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER , 201 4

.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Parks, Judge

Parks, Judge, sitting by assignment
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 118 (Monday, June 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13882]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Flight 93 National Memorial Advisory Commission

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of August 1, 2009 Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the date of the August 1, 2009 meeting 
of the Flight 93 Advisory Commission.

DATES: The public meeting of the Advisory Commission will be held on 
Saturday, August 1, 2009 from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. (Eastern). The 
Commission will meet jointly with the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force.
    Location: The meeting will be held at the Somerset County 
Courthouse, Court Room <greek-i>1, located at 111 E. Union Street, 
Somerset, PA 15501.

Agenda

    The August 1, 2009 joint Commission and Task Force meeting will 
consist of:
    1. Opening of Meeting and Pledge of Allegiance.
    2. Review and Approval of Commission Minutes from February 7, 2009.
    3. Reports from the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force and National Park 
Service.
    4. Old Business.
    5. New Business.
    6. Public Comments.
    7. Closing Remarks.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanne M. Hanley, Superintendent, 
Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501. 
814.443.4557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    The meeting will be open to the public. Any member of the public 
may file with the Commission a written statement concerning agenda 
items. Address all statements to: Flight 93 Advisory Commission, 109 
West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501.

    Dated: June 2, 2009.
Joanne M. Hanley,
Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial.
[FR Doc. E9-13882 Filed 6-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-25-M
***NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION***

***MICS AUDIT CHECKLIST***

***TIER B-INTERNAL AUDIT (BIA)***

Page 3 of 6
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 27806)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review Recovery Act Limited Competition: RFA-OD-09-005, Supporting New Faculty Recruitment.                    

*Date:*                         July 10, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         12:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mary Kelly, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Inst of Dental & Craniofacial Research, NIH 6701 Democracy Blvd, room 672, MSC 4878, Bethesda, MD 20892-4878, 301-594-4809,                         *mary_kelly@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 4, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-13676 Filed 6-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Peter A. Walker, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Union Security Insurance Company; 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 9, 2007
96-2333.

#### Zukowski v. Testa.

Franklin App. No. 96APH03-358. Reported at 77 Ohio St.3d 1518, 674 N.E.2d 371. On motion for reconsideration and on second motion for reconsideration. Motions denied.
- 931 - 

### N ebraska 

### S upreme 

### C ourt 

### A dva nc e 

### S heets 

### 303 N ebraska 

### R eports STATE v . M c GINN Cite as 303 Neb. 931



### S tate of 

### N ebraska 

### , appellee 

### , v



### .

D a nn y 

### J. M c 

### G i nn 

### , appella n t



### . ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed August 23, 2019. No. S

- 18

- 744.

suppleme n tal opi n io n 

### Appeal from the District Court for Holt County, M ark 

### D

. K ozisek 

### , Judge, on appeal thereto from the County Court for Holt County, K ale 

### B

. B urdi c k 

### , Judge. Former opinion modi

fied. Motion for rehearing overruled. Forrest F. Peetz, of Peetz Law, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Nathan A. Liss, for appellee.
H eavi c a n 

### , C.J., M iller 

### ‐ L erma n 

### , C assel 

### , S ta c y 

### , F u n ke 

### , P

apik 

### , and F reude n ber g 

### , JJ.

P er 

### C uriam



### . This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellee, State of Nebraska, concerning our opinion in State v. McGinn

. 1 

### We overrule the motion, but we modify the opinion as follows: In the analysis section, we withdraw the last paragraph 2 

### and substitute the following:

1 State v. McGinn, ante p. 224, 928 N.W.2d 391 (2019).
2 Id. at 234, 928 N.W.2d at 398. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 11/01/2019 01:05 AM CDT- 932 - 

### N ebraska 

### S upreme 

### C ourt 

### A dva nc e 

### S heets 

### 303 N ebraska 

### R eports STATE v . M c GINN Cite as 303 Neb. 931 

### In this matter, because we consider all evidence admit

ted by the trial court, erroneously or not, we consider the breath test in our double jeopardy analysis. Considering the breath test, the evidence was sufficient to sustain a guilty verdict for a violation of § 60

- 6,196(1)(c) as charged. As such, double jeopardy does not forbid a remand for a new trial. Therefore, in consideration of all of the above, we reverse the district court’s decision affirming the county court’s conviction and remand the cause to the district court with directions to remand the matter to the county court for a new trial. In the sole paragraph of the conclusion section, we withdraw the last sentence 3 

### and substitute the following: “Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s decision affirming the county court’s conviction, but determine double jeopardy does not require dismissal of this action.” The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. F ormer opi n io n modified



### . M otio n for reheari ng overruled



### .

3 Id.
## T HE 

## M ILLER 

## L AW 

## F IRM

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

___

J. KEITH WEBB TURTLE CREEK CENTRE kwebb@tmlfpc.com 3811 TURTLE CREEK BLVD., SUITE 1950 DALLAS, TEXAS 75219 TELEPHONE (469) 916-2552 FACSIMILE (469) 916-2555

February 2 , 2015

Via e-Filing Fifth Court of Appeals George L. Allen, Sr. Courts Building 600 Commerce Street, Suite 200 Dallas, Texas 75 202 -4658

Re: Case No. 05-13 -01653

- CV Thomas Allen Powell, et al. v. Penhollow, Inc., et al. Our File No. 0500.23259

Dear Clerk:

Please allow this correspondence to serve as notice that I will be out of the office and unavailable on the following dates for pre-planned events:

March 5 & 6, 201 5 Continuing Education
March 24 - 30, 201 5 Vacation May 14 & 15, 2015 Child’s College Graduation

I would appreciate you not setting any matters for hearing and/or oral argument during this period of time.

By copy of this letter, I am notifying all counsel of record in this matter of the above and respectfully would request that he not set any matters during the aforementioned dates as well.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please feel free to

contact me.

Sincerely,

/s/ J. Keith Webb

J. Keith Webb
JKW/km

c c: Via e-Service Ray Murphy Abernathy, Roeder, Boyd & Joplin, P. C. ACCEPTED
05-13-01653-cv FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS 2/2/2015 9:20:38 AM

LISA MATZ CLERK
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,880]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on May 4, 2009, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at the Carpenter Company, Cookeville, Tennessee.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of May 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13918 Filed 6-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P