alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 123

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 5946,

3 the Clerk of the House shall make the following correc4 tions:

5 (1) In the table of contents, strike the item re6 lating to section 702 and redesignate the item relat7 ing to section 703 as relating to section 702.

8 (2) In title VII, strike section 702 and redesig9 nate section 703 as section 702.

Passed the Senate December 7, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 123

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for correction to the enrollment of the

bill H.R. 5946
Exhibit 31.2

                             CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Public Law
Number107-204), the Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies
that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Art's-Way Manufacturing Co.,
   Inc.;

2. Based upon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary
   in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
   under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
   the period covered by this report;

3. Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows
   of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this report;

4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
   defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company
   and have:

   (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
       disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
       supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
       the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known
       to us by others within those entities, particularly during
       the period in which this report is being prepared;

   (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
       procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
       effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
       of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control
       over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent
       fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
       materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
       reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
   to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company board
   of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

   (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
       operation of internal controls over financial reporting which could
       adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize,
       and report financial information; and

   (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
       employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control
       over financial reporting.

/s/ John C. Breitung
John C. Breitung
Chief Financial Officer

2/23/04
Date
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 346 

To implement equal protection under the 14th article of amendment to the 

Constitution for the right to life of each born and preborn human person. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 29, 2009 

Mr. WICKER (for himself, Mr. VITTER, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. ENZI, Mr. 

BROWNBACK, Mr. MARTINEZ, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. THUNE, Mr. COBURN, 

and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To implement equal protection under the 14th article of 

amendment to the Constitution for the right to life of 

each born and preborn human person. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Life at Conception 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RIGHT TO LIFE. 

7 To implement equal protection for the right to life 

8 of each born and preborn human person, and pursuant 

9 to the duty and authority of the Congress, including ConVerDate Nov 24 2008 04:12 Jan 30, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S346.IS S346

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 346 IS

1 gress’ power under article I, section 8, to make necessary 

2 and proper laws, and Congress’ power under section 5 of 

3 the 14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the 

4 United States, the Congress hereby declares that the right 

5 to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each 

6 human being. 

7 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

8 For purposes of this Act: 

9 (1) HUMAN PERSON; HUMAN BEING.—The 

10 terms ‘‘human person’’ and ‘‘human being’’ include 

11 each and every member of the species homo sapiens 

12 at all stages of life, including, but not limited to, the 

13 moment of fertilization, cloning, and other moment 

14 at which an individual member of the human species 

15 comes into being. 

16 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ used in the 

17 14th article of amendment to the Constitution of the 

18 United States and other applicable provisions of the 

19 Constitution includes the District of Columbia, the 

20 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each other terri21 tory or possession of the United States. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                     Subsidiaries of COMFORCE Corporation

The following is a list of the material subsidiaries of COMFORCE Corporation
with jurisdiction of incorporation indicated thereby.

1.  COMFORCE Operating, Inc. (Delaware)
2.  COMFORCE Technical Services, Inc. (Delaware)
3.  COMFORCE Telecom, Inc. (Delaware)
4.  SUMTEC Corporation (Delaware)
5.  Uniforce Services, Inc. (New York)
6.  PrO Unlimited, Inc. (New York)
7.  Uniforce Staffing Services, Inc. (New York)
8.  Uniforce Payrolling Services, Inc. (New York)
9.  COMFORCE Technical NW, Inc. (New York)
10. COMFORCE Information Technologies, Inc. (New York)
11. Temporary Help Industry Servicing Co., Inc. (New York)
12. Brentwood Service Group, Inc. (New York)
13. Thisco of Canada, Inc. (New York)
14. Camelot Communications Group, Inc. (New Jersey)
15. Camelot Control Group, Inc. (New Jersey)
16. PrO Services, Inc. (Delaware)
17. PrO Unlimited Services, Inc. (Delaware)
18. COMFORCE Technical Administrative Services, Inc. (New York)
19. Uniforce Payrolling Tri-State, Inc. (New York)
20. Gerri G. Inc. (New York)
21. Clinical Labforce of America, Inc. (New York)
22. Brentwood Canada, Inc. (New York)
23. BXI Net, Inc. (California)
24. COMFORCE Coding Services, Inc. (New York)
25. COMFORCE P-T-P Services, Inc. (New York)
26. Labforce Services of America, Inc. (New York)
Exhibit No. 99

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of  Ambassador  Food Services  Corporation
10-KSB  for the year  ending  May 30,  2002 as filed  with  the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert A. Laudicina,
Chief Executive Officer (and chief finanical  officer) of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial condition and result of operation of
          the Company.


                                                        /s/ Robert A. Laudicina
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        September 10, 2002
Presidential Documents

27903 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 112 

Friday, June 12, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2009–19 of June 5, 2009 

Suspension of Limitations Under the Jerusalem Embassy Act 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, including section 7(a) of the Jerusalem 

Embassy Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–45) (the ‘‘Act’’), I hereby determine 

that it is necessary, in order to protect the national security interests of 

the United States, to suspend for a period of 6 months the limitations 

set forth in sections 3(b) and 7(b) of the Act. 

You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit this determination to 

the Congress, accompanied by a report in accordance with section 7(a) 

of the Act, and to publish the determination in the Federal Register. 

This suspension shall take effect after transmission of this determination 

and report to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, June 5, 2009 

[FR Doc. E9–14051 

Filed 6–11–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


OB#1.EPS</GPH>
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Hadera Paper Ltd. (the Company)
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Shaul Gliksberg,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of his knowledge, that:

| | (1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: June 16, 2009 |  | /s/ Shaul Gliksberg
Shaul GliksbergChief Financial and Business Development Officer
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,232
<SECURITIES>                                     5,890
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,350
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         137,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                  75,252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,755
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,635
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,348
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,348
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,348
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
APR

Resolution No. 9 7-26 ~~ I

BY THE dOUNCIL METLAKATLA INDIAN COMMUNITY

ANNETTE ISLANDS RESERVE

WHEREAS, the Metlakatla Indian Community Council is the governing

body of the Metlakatla Indian Community, Annette Islands Reseive,

Alaska by the authority of the Constitution and By-laws of the Metlakatla

Indian Community as approved on August 23, 1944 by the Secretary the

Interior; and,

WHEREAS, the Metlakatla Indian Community allows gaming operations

on the Reseive subject to the Indian Gaming Regulatory act and

regulations by the National Indian Gaming Commission; and,

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED, the Council hereby approves the

attached REVISED TITLE 4 CIVIL CODE, CHAPTER 4, GAMING

ORDINANCE, dated March 2/, 1997; and,

BE IT FURTHER RESOL VED, aid ordinance shall replace all previous

gaming ordinances approved by the Council and as stated in SECTION 4

4.9 REPEAL; and,

BE IT FURTHER RESOL VED, the Tribal Gaming Commission is authorized

to submit the ordinance to the National Indian Gaming Commission for

their review and approval.

Signed & Dated: This 26th day of March , 1997 at Metlakatla, Alaska.

Signed:

Met/akatla India ommunity

/Ja L. Booth.

~

Sr., Mayor

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly approved at a

meeting of the Council, held on March21, 1997; at which a quorum was

present by a vote of 7 FOR and ~OPPOSED; the Mayor being

authorized to sign said Resolution.

L

Signed

ATTEST.~
#### SEACOAST LIQUOR DISTRIBUTORS, Inc., v. KIPS BAY BREWING CO., Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Sept. 10, 1947.

On Rehearing Oct. 3, 1947.

Samuel Bernstein, of New York City (Thomas R. Strahan, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Lord, Day & Lord, of New York City (Woodson D. Scott, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

MEDINA, District Judge.

 The motion is denied. In order to make applicable here the reasoning of Bradley v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp., D.C., 6 F.R.D. 37, affirmed 2 Cir., 159 F.2d 39, the illegality of the contract relied upon by defendant must appear upon the face of the affirmative defense which plaintiff seeks to strike. Affidavits may not be relied upon to demonstrate such alleged illegality. Nor is there any basis for the alternative relief requested.

Settle order on notice.

On Rehearing.

The motion for reargument is granted and the conclusion previously reached is adhered to. Counsel mistakenly rely on Rule 12(b) (6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, which is applicable to motions to dismiss the complaint, whereas a motion to strike an affirmative defense for insufficiency is governed by Rule 12(f). On such a motion affidavits may not be considered.

 The motion for summary judgment is also denied. This is not because of any error, irregularity or omission on the part of counsel for plaintiff but because the sit-*75nation disclosed by the pleadings and the affidavits and briefs is not a proper one for summary judgment. The legality or illegality of the agreement alleged in the affirmative defense under attack, which was evidently verbal, and the terms of which appear to be in dispute, should be determined on the trial when all the attendant facts and circumstances as well as the conflicting testimony relative to the agreement entered into by the parties, if any, can be fully inquired into. Furthermore, even in the absence of the existing controversy on the facts, it is difficult to see how the elimination of this affirmative defense could lead to any judgment, summary or otherwise. It would merely narrow the area of dispute; and the Rules do not appear to contemplate the use of the summary judgment procedure in situations such as the present one.

Motion denied.

Settle order on notice.
#### John Doe, Appellant, v Guthrie Clinic, Ltd., et al., Respondents.

Decided April 25, 2013

*896Certification of a question by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, pursuant to section 500.27 of the Rules of Practice of the Court Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.27), accepted and the issues presented are to be considered after briefing and argument.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED, PURSUANT
                              TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned executive officers of the registrant hereby certify that
this Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained herein fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the registrant.


                                            Parkvale Financial Corporation

Dated: February 17, 2004

                                            By: /s/ Timothy G. Rubritz
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Timothy G. Rubritz
                                                Vice President-Treasurer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer



                                       23
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Edward F. Ruttenberg, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Locker Group Incorporated;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Date: September 4, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/EDWARD F. RUTTENBERGEdward F. Ruttenberg
Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
3

GGR Trending

+2.5%
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

CHAIR’S NOTICE – Chairman E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Visit www.NIGC.gov to learn more about the NIGC 3 For 35 Project— a 

year-long project emphasizing the importance of conversations among 

the tribal gaming regulatory community about workforce preparedness.

Date: May 1, 2023

Re: AISES Leadership Summit

I am grateful to the American Indian Science and Engineering 

Society (AISES) for the opportunity the NIGC team had to 

participate in the AISES leadership summit. I contributed a 

prerecorded video message as part of a panel discussion. The 

panel’s in-person participants included NIGC’s IT Audit Manager, 

Tim Cotton and Mary Parker, Public Affairs Manager as part of a 

discussion with students and professionals in the science and 

engineering fields.

For over a year, NIGC’s 3 For 35 Campaign has consistently 

promoted the Indian gaming regulatory community’s conversation 

around preparing for a robust and thoughtful next generation of 

regulators. In particular we have focused on what is required to 

cultivate a strong workforce with the skills and knowledge 

necessary to address future trends in the regulation of Indian 

gaming industry.

Professions with a passion for STEM skills and a talent for 

helping to spark innovation are increasingly needed to meet our 

regulatory responsibilities in an effective way. Remaining 

engaged in the new game platforms and technology that operators 

regularly innovate; leveraging new automation technology with 

the potential for more efficient and dynamic background 

investigations and surveillance; and cultivating Indian country 

protectors to guard against cyber security threats to Indian 

gaming’s operations and regulation are some of the examples 

discussed during this panel.

My video presentation for the panel can be found HERE.

As an important means to strengthening Indian gaming regulation, 

I look forward to more opportunities to support students and 

professionals dedicated to the science and engineering fields.

###
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<LEGEND> THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CORPORATIONS FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

      <MULTIPLIER> 1

      <S>                           <C>
      <PERIOD-TYPE>                     QUARTER
      <FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAR-31-1999
      <PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1999
      <CASH>                                  0
      <SECURITIES>                        2,000
      <RECEIVABLES>                           0
      <ALLOWANCES>                            0
      <INVENTORY>                             0
      <CURRENT ASSETS>                        0
      <PP&E>                                  0
      <DEPRECIATION>                          0
      <TOTAL ASSETS>                      2,000
      <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              77,368
      <BONDS>                                 0
      <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
      <PREFERRED>                             0
      <COMMON>                            2,257
      <OTHER-SE>                        (77,625)
      <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            0
      <SALES>                                 0
      <TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
      <CGS>                                   0
      <TOTAL COSTS>                           0
      <OTHER EXPENSES>                        0
      <LOSS PROVISION>                        0
      <INTEREST EXPENSE>                      0
      <INCOME PRETAX>                         0
      <INCOME-TAX>                            0
      <INCOME CONTINUING>                     0
      <DISCONTINUED>                          0
      <EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
      <CHANGES>                               0
      <NET-INCOME>                            0
      <EPS-BASIC>                           0
      <EPS-DILUTED>                           0