alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 22.1      List of Subsidiaries



The following  companies are subsidiaries of the Company and are included in the
consolidated financial statements of the Company:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                         Percentage of Voting
NAME                                                  Jurisdiction of Organization       Securities Owned
----                                                  ----------------------------       ----------------

<S>                                                   <C>                                <C>
American Locker Security Systems, Inc.                Delaware                           100%
American Locker Company, Inc.                         Delaware                           100%
American Locker Company of Canada, Ltd.               Dominion of Canada                 100% (1)
Canadian Locker Company, Ltd.                         Dominion of Canada                 100% (2)
American Locker Security Systems International        Virgin Islands                     100% (1)
Security Manufacturing Corporation                    Delaware                           100%
ALTRECO, Incorporated                                 Delaware                           100%

(1)   Owned by American Locker Security Systems, Inc.
(2)   Owned by American Locker Company of Canada, Ltd.



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000824578
<NAME> INFORMATION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,576,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                    81,400
<INVENTORY>                                    331,193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,570,912
<PP&E>                                       5,787,151
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,737,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,817,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,652,888
<BONDS>                                        908,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,722,113
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       231,594
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,563,073)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,817,653
<SALES>                                      2,754,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,754,668
<CGS>                                        1,696,811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,696,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                19,916
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,482
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,482
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,482
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Respondent, v Lauren Scudero, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 300]

*928In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated August 8, 2005, which granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

On August 13, 2004, Lauren Scudero served a notice of intent to arbitrate an uninsured motorist claim on State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter State Farm). Almost six months later, State Farm commenced this proceeding for a permanent stay of arbitration on the ground that Scudero had previously made an identical demand to arbitrate a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, and State Farm was granted a permanent stay of arbitration based on the court’s finding that the alleged offending vehicle was insured by New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company. The Supreme Court granted State Farm’s petition for a permanent stay of arbitration, finding that it was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We reverse.

A petition to stay arbitration must be brought within 20 days of service of a notice of intent *to*arbitrate (CPLR 7503 [c]). “This limitation is strictly enforced and a court has no jurisdiction to entertain an untimely application” *(Matter of Metropolitan Prop. & Liab. Ins. Co. v Hancock,*183 AD2d 831, 832 [1992]). We reject State Farm’s contention that the 20-day limitation period does not apply when the basis for the stay is res judicata *(see Matter of Allcity Ins. Co. [Vitucci],*151 AD2d 430, 431 [1989], *affd,*74 NY2d 879, 880 [1989]). Accordingly, the proceeding was untimely and should have been dismissed.

In light of our determination, it is unnecessary to reach the merits of whether the arbitration was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Crane, J.P, Ritter, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Irwin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the periods presented.











Date:           November 25, 2009                                                                           /S/
JOHN R. IRWIN


John R. Irwin


President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT        23.1

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by        reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-74255, No. 333-87786 and No.        333-140781) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-92388 and 333-117534) of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. of our        report dated November 28, 2007relating to the consolidated financial        statementsand the effectiveness of        internal control over financial reporting,which appears in the Annual Report toShareholders which is incorporated in this        Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

/S/        PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

 

Houston,        Texas

November        28, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

# Written Statement of
the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Bandag, Incorporated
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chairman of
the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Bandag, Incorporated (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Martin G. Carver Martin G.
CarverChairman and Chief Executive Officer
April 27, 2007
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated January 9, 2009, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on January 21, 2009, (74 FR 3643), Organix Inc., 240 Salem Street, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II: Drug
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
ICocaine (9041)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for sale to its customers for research purposes. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 USC 823(a) and determined that the registration of Organix Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Organix Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with State and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: June 3, 2009. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E9-13359 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 23(i)

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statements:



| | 1. | Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-28239) pertaining to the Baldor Electric Company Employee Savings Plan,
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Registration Statements (Forms S-8, No. 33-59281, No. 33-60731, and No. 333-62331) pertaining to the Baldor Electric Company 1994 Incentive Stock Plan,
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-33109) pertaining to the Baldor Electric Company 1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors,
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-33287) pertaining to the Baldor Electric Company Employees Profit Sharing and Savings Plan,
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 5. | Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-67474) Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors,
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 6. | Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-0134641) pertaining to the Baldor Electric Company 2006 Equity Incentive Plan,
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 7. | Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-149687) pertaining to the Baldor Electric Company Employees Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 8. | Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-139854) and the related Prospectuses pertaining to the offering of Debt Securities and Common Stock
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated March 3, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Baldor Electric Company and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Baldor Electric Company included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 3, 2009.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma

March 3, 2009
- 3353-2
- 3353-21
1933_001
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Floyd L. Smart, Appellant.

Submitted May 6, 2013;

decided May 30, 2013

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Mark D. Funk, Esq., 144 Exchange Blvd., Ste. 400, Rochester, New York 14614 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Exhibit 12.3
 PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS
(dollars in thousands)
 Twelve Months Ended December 31,2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Earnings:Income from continuing
operations
    
    $
    213,557
    
    
    $
    298,744
    
    
    $
    316,265
    
    
    $
    227,288
    
    
    $
    242,887Income taxes
    
    
    65,407
    
    
    
    150,910
    
    
    
    155,855
    
    
    
    129,533
    
    
    
    133,771Fixed charges
    
    
    241,976
    
    
    
    235,705
    
    
    
    225,119
    
    
    
    214,430
    
    
    
    214,803Total earnings
    
    $
    520,940
    
    
    $
    685,359
    
    
    $
    697,239
    
    
    $
    571,251
    
    
    $
    591,461Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    216,290
    
    
    $
    208,521
    
    
    $
    196,826
    
    
    $
    185,087
    
    
    $
    183,527Estimated interest
portion of annual
rents
    
    
    25,686
    
    
    
    27,184
    
    
    
    28,293
    
    
    
    29,343
    
    
    
    31,276Total fixed charges
    
    $
    241,976
    
    
    $
    235,705
    
    
    $
    225,119
    
    
    $
    214,430
    
    
    $
    214,803Preferred Stock Dividend
Requirements:Income before income
taxes
    
    $
    278,964
    
    
    $
    449,654
    
    
    $
    472,120
    
    
    $
    356,821
    
    
    $
    376,658Net income from
continuing operations
    
    
    213,557
    
    
    
    298,744
    
    
    
    316,265
    
    
    
    227,288
    
    
    
    242,887Ratio of income before
income taxes to net
income
    
    
    1.306
    
    
    
    1.505
    
    
    
    1.493
    
    
    
    1.570
    
    
    
    1.551Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Preferred stock dividend
requirements  ratio
(above) times preferred
stock dividends
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Fixed Charges and Preferred
Stock Dividend Requirements:Fixed charges
    
    $
    241,976
    
    
    $
    235,705
    
    
    $
    225,119
    
    
    $
    214,430
    
    
    $
    214,803Preferred stock dividend
requirements
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total
    
    $
    241,976
    
    
    $
    235,705
    
    
    $
    225,119
    
    
    $
    214,430
    
    
    $
    214,803Ratio of Earnings to
Combined Fixed Charges
and Preferred Stock
Dividend
Requirements (rounded
down)
    
    
    2.15
    
    
    
    2.90
    
    
    
    3.09
    
    
    
    2.66
    
    
    
    2.75
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              14,448
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           55,356
<OTHER-SE>                                        (69,804)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            0
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .00
        



</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11 - 5137

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. LOUIS A. BROWN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:11

- cr - 00057

- REP

- 1 )

Submitted : July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Frances H. Pratt, Mary E. Maguire, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpubli shed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2

PER CURIAM:

Louis A. Brown appeals his conviction and 240

- month sentence following his guilty plea, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to distribution of cocaine base , in violation of 21
U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2006). On appeal, Brown’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal but questioning whether Brown’s waiver of appellate rights was valid
and enforc eable. Brown filed a pro se supplemental brief in which he argued that trial counsel was ineffective and that the district court erred by sentencing him as a career offender, enhancing his offense level for obstruction of justice, and denying him a downwa rd adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. Finding no error, we affirm.

The sole issue counsel raised in the Anders brief is whether Brown’s waiver of appellate rights is valid and enforceable. However, we decline to sua sponte enforce the waive r because t he Government has not sought to do so
. See United States v. Blick , 408 F.3d 162, 168 (4th Cir. 2005) (citing United States v. Brock , 211 F.3d 88, 90 n.1 (4th Cir. 2000) )
. After considering Brown’s pro se claims that relate to alleged errors by the district court and reviewing the record in this case i n accordance with Anders , we have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We decline to consider Brown’s3

ineffective assistance of counsel claims in this appeal. See United States v. Powell , 680 F.3d 350, 359 (4th Cir. 2012) (proceeding standard).

We therefore affirm the district court’s judgmen t . This court requires that counsel inform Brown , in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Br own requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof
was served on Brown . We dispens e with oral argument because the facts and legal con tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED