alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Retirement Agreement with Michael D. Rose)



  ASHLAND INC. 50 E. RIVERCENTER BLVD. P.O. BOX 391 COVINGTON, KY 41012-0391

PHILIP W. BLOCK
Administrative Vice President
Human Resources
(606) 815-3759
(606) 815-5053 (FAX)



                                  November 22, 1999


Mr. Michael D. Rose
Midaro Investments, Inc.
6305 Humphreys Blvd.
Suite 110
Memphis, TN 38120

Dear Mike:

The purpose of this letter is to confirm our discussions earlier this month
in Covington, regarding your retirement from the Board and the operation of
our various  compensation  and benefit  programs.  The Board  approved  our
proposals and recommendations at its meeting on November 4, 1999.

I.       Your participation in the Directors'  Charitable Award Program was
         approved.  Thus, as contemplated  under the program,  Ashland will
         donate   $1,000,000   upon   your   death   to   your   designated
         beneficiaries.

II.      Under the shareholder-approved plan governing the restricted stock
         grants you've previously received,  your retirement will result in
         the  forfeiture of the shares.  Ashland will pay to you the market
         value of those  shares  on the  date of your  retirement  from the
         Board.

III.     With respect to the stock options you've  previously been granted,
         you  will  have  one year  from  the  date of your  retirement  to
         exercise  the  options.  To the  extent  you have  not  exercised,
         Ashland will pay to you the Black-Scholes value of the unexercised
         option shares.  The Black-Scholes  value will be determined on the
         first anniversary of your date of retirement.

IV.      Your account  balance under the Directors'  Deferred  Compensation
         Plan will be paid to you in accordance with your previously  filed
         elections.

V.       As you may recall,  the  Directors'  Retirement  and Death Benefit
         Plans were  terminated  and benefits  were  converted to shares of
         Ashland  Common  Stock  under  the  Deferred   Retirement  Benefit
         Account.  The shares allocated to this account will be paid to you
         in accordance with your previously filed elections.

A  detail  of  your  current  elections  and  account  balances  under  the
above-mentioned  plans is enclosed  with this  letter.  Should you have any
questions,  please don't hesitate to contact me or Susan Esler,  Manager of
Executive Compensation, at 606/815-3543.

                                               Sincerely,


                                                  /s/ Phil

                                               Philip W. Block
Enclosure
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                   Exhibit 12(e)

                            Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
              Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and
       Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends



                                                              1994     1995     1996     1997    1998     1999
<S>                                                          <C>     <C>       <C>     <C>     <C>        <C>
Fixed charges, as defined:
  Total Interest                                             $18,272 $17,802   $16,304 $15,287 $14,792    $14,680
  Interest applicable to rentals                               1,245     916       831     911   1,045      1,281
                                                             ----------------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges, as defined                               19,517  18,718    17,135  16,198  15,837     15,961

Preferred dividends, as defined (a)                            2,071   1,964     1,549   1,723   1,566      1,566
                                                             ----------------------------------------------------

Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined   $21,588 $20,682   $18,684 $17,921 $17,403    $17,527
                                                             ====================================================
Earnings as defined:

  Net Income                                                 $13,211 $34,386   $26,776 $15,451 $15,172    $18,961
  Add:
    Provision for income taxes:
     Total                                                     4,600  20,467    16,216  12,142  10,042     13,030
    Fixed charges as above                                    19,517  18,718    17,135  16,198  15,837     15,961
                                                             ----------------------------------------------------

Total earnings, as defined                                   $37,328 $73,571   $60,127 $43,791 $41,051    $47,952
                                                             ====================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined                  1.91    3.93      3.51    2.70    2.59       3.00
                                                             ====================================================

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
 preferred dividends, as defined                                1.73    3.56      3.22    2.44    2.36       2.74
                                                             ====================================================


------------------------
(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by
    dividing the preferred dividend requirement by one hundred percent (100%)
    minus the income tax rate.

(b) Earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 1991 include the $90
    million effect of the 1991 NOPSI Settlement.


</TABLE>
97-752.

#### State v. Phelps.

Cuyahoga App. No. 69157. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATS Medical, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard W. Kramp,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                                     /s/ Richard W. Kramp
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Richard W. Kramp
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     August 14, 2002
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 19, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00068-CV 

COLETTE FERRELL, Appellant 

V. 

MIDFIRST BANK, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-00014-E 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By electronically-delivered postcard dated 

September 2, 2015, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed 

appellant to file both her brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant 

that failure to file her brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal 

without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed her brief, an extension motion, or 

otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of her brief. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). 

150068F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

COLETTE FERRELL, Appellant 

No. 05-15-00068-CV V. 

MIDFIRST BANK, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 5, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-00014-E. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee MIDFIRST BANK recover its costs of this appeal from 

appellant COLETTE FERRELL. 

Judgment entered November 19, 2015.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/Stephen J. Hansbrough                  |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Stephen      J. Hansbrough                |
|   | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | HearUSA,      Inc.                        |
|   | May      11, 2010                         |
|   |                                      |
|   | /s/Francisco Puñal                   |
|   | Francisco      Puñal                 |
|   | Senior      Vice President and            |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer              |
|   | HearUSA,      Inc.                        |
|   | May      11, 2010                         |

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 112 (Friday, June 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13927]



[[Page 28109]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee 
on Disability Compensation will meet on July 7-8, 2009, in the 
Chandelier Room at the St. Regis Washington DC, 923 16th and K Streets, 
NW., from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day. The meeting is open to the 
public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on the maintenance and periodic readjustment of the VA Schedule 
for Rating Disabilities. The Committee is to assemble and review 
relevant information relating to the nature and character of 
disabilities arising from service in the Armed Forces, provide an 
ongoing assessment of the effectiveness of the rating schedule and give 
advice on the most appropriate means of responding to the needs of 
veterans relating to disability compensation.
    On July 7, the Committee will receive briefings about studies on 
compensation for Veterans with service-connected disabilities and other 
Veteran benefits programs. On July 8, the Committee will break into 
subcommittees to prepare draft recommendations which will be 
subsequently considered by the full Committee. In the afternoon of July 
8, time will be allocated for receiving public comments. Public 
comments will be limited to three minutes each. Individuals wishing to 
make oral statements before the Committee will be accommodated on a 
first-come, first-served basis. Individuals who speak are invited to 
submit 1-2 page summaries of their comments at the time of the meeting 
for inclusion in the official meeting record.
    The public may submit written statements for the Committee's review 
to Ms. Ersie Farber, Designated Federal Officer, Department of Veterans 
Affairs, Veterans Benefits Administration (211A), 810 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20420. Any member of the public wishing to attend 
the meeting or seeking additional information should contact Ms. Farber 
at (202) 461-9728 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#753007061c105b1314071710073503145b121a03"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="135661607a763d7572617176615365723d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 9, 2009.

    By direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-13927 Filed 6-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Gotham Partners, L.P., et al., Respondents, v High River Limited Partnership, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 2]

*454Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered September 6, 2005, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ cross motion for partial summary judgment as to liability, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Section 1.4 of the parties’ Unit Purchase Agreement unambiguously provided that plaintiff sellers would be entitled to an additional purchase price upon a subsequent “sale or other transfer” of the sale units by defendant purchaser. The motion court, taking into consideration the reasonable expectations of the contracting parties, as their agreement clearly evinces when read in part or as a whole *(see Sutton v East Riv. Sav. Bank,*55 NY2d 550, 555 [1982]), properly construed this broad language to include the subsequent merger transaction pursuant to which defendant received cash in exchange for the sale units *(see Paddington Partners v Bouchard,*730 F Supp 1241, 1244 [SD NY 1990]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
EX-10.7




 Exhibit 10.7 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ( the “Amendment”) is entered by and between CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE a
California banking corporation (the “Bank”), and Thomas M. Dorrance, an individual (the “Executive”), as of June 19, 2018 and amends that certain Employment Agreement dated as of March 10, 2016 between the
Bank and the Executive (the “Agreement”). 
 For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is
hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Bank and the Executive hereby agree as follows: 
 1. The
first sentence of Section 3.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to replace “$190,500” with “$208,500.” 

2. The following sentence is hereby added to the end of Section 2 of the Agreement: 

“Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, however, this Agreement and Executive’s employment
with the Bank, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, shall terminate on April 22, 2032.” 

3. Section 7.2(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“(i) cash payment in the amount equal to one half times the sum of the Executive’s (A) Base Salary
and (B) Average Annual Bonus, all payable in a lump sum within 30 days of the Date of Termination, and” 
 4. The
first sentence of the third paragraph of Section 7.2(b)(iii) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“The Executive acknowledges and agrees that severance benefits pursuant to this Section 7.2(b) are in
lieu of all damages, payments and liabilities on account of the events described above for which such severance benefits may be due the Executive under Section 7.2(a) of this Agreement.” 

5. Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. No amendment, modification or additions to this
Amendment shall be binding unless in writing and signed by the parties hereto. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns. 

[Signature page follows] 

  
 -1- 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has executed this Amendment as of the
date first set forth above. 
  

			
	CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE,
	a California banking corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Steven E. Shelton

		 	Steven E. Shelton, President and CEO
	
	 /s/ Thomas M. Dorrance

	Thomas M. Dorrance



  
 -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         339,968
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,194,236
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,588,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,849
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,502,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,588,204
<SALES>                                        283,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,785
<CGS>                                          143,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  181,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,293
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,492
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,492
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,492
<EPS-BASIC>                                    11.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.78


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3354 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3354

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges Complex 
  as the Sam D. Hamilton North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges 
                                Complex.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE NORTH MISSISSIPPI NATIONAL WILDLIFE 
              REFUGES COMPLEX.

    (a) In General.--The North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges 
Complex, located in the State of Mississippi and consisting of the 
Dahomey National Wildlife Refuge, the Tallahatchie National Wildlife 
Refuge, the Coldwater National Wildlife Refuge, and the Bear Lake Unit, 
is redesignated as the ``Sam D. Hamilton North Mississippi National 
Wildlife Refuges Complex.''
    (b) Boundary Revision.--Nothing in this Act prevents the Secretary 
of the Interior from making adjustments to the boundaries of the Sam D. 
Hamilton North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges Complex (referred 
to in this section as the ``Refuges Complex''), as the Secretary 
determines to be appropriate, to carry out the mission of the National 
Wildlife Refuge System in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge 
System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.) and any 
other applicable authority.
    (c) Addition of Land.--Nothing in this Act prevents the Secretary 
of the Interior from adding to the Refuges Complex new land or parcels 
of the National Wildlife Refuge System, as the Secretary determines to 
be appropriate, to carry out the mission of the National Wildlife 
Refuge System in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge System 
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.) and any other 
applicable authority.
    (d) References.--Any reference in any statute, rule, regulation, 
executive order, publication, map, paper, or other document of the 
United States to the North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges 
Complex is deemed to refer to the Sam D. Hamilton North Mississippi 
National Wildlife Refuges Complex.

            Passed the Senate August 5, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3354

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To redesignate the North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges Complex 
  as the Sam D. Hamilton North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges 
                                Complex.
```
97-374.

#### State ex rel. Timson v. Petro.

In Mandamus and Procedendo. On answer of respondents Paul Herbert et al. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,326
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                       830
<INVENTORY>                                     26,063
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,155
<PP&E>                                          42,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 169,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,420
<BONDS>                                        125,189
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,970
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,446)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   169,589
<SALES>                                        206,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               206,693
<CGS>                                          159,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  196,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,677)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,352)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,701)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (4,522)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,223)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (8.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (8.63)


</TABLE>