alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

BALDOR ELECTRIC COMPANY AND AFFILIATES

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                       |  |                    
|-------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARIES                   |  | LOCATION           
|Baldor of Arkansas, Inc.               |  | Arkansas           
|                                       | 
|Baldor of Nevada, Inc.                 |  | Nevada             
|                                       | 
|BEC Business Trust                     |  | Massachusetts      
|                                       | 
|Baldor of Texas, L.P.                  |  | Texas              
|                                       | 
|Baldor International, Inc.             |  | U.S. Virgin Islands
|                                       | 
|Southwestern Die Casting Company, Inc. |  | Arkansas           
|                                       | 
|Baldor UK Holdings, Inc.               |  | Delaware           
|                                       | 
|Baldor UK Ltd                          |  | United Kingdom     
|                                       | 
|Baldor Holdings, Inc.                  |  | Delaware           
|                                       | 
|Baldor de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.         |  | Mexico             
|                                       | 
|Baldor ASR AG                          |  | Switzerland        
|                                       | 
|Baldor ASR GmbH fur Antriebstechnik    |  | Germany            
|                                       | 
|Baldor ASR U.K. Limited                |  | United Kingdom     
|                                       | 
|Baldor Italia S.r.l.                   |  | Italy              
|                                       | 
|Australian Baldor Pty Limited          |  | Australia          
|                                       | 
|Baldor Electric (Asia) PTE, Ltd.       |  | Singapore          
|                                       | 
|Northern Magnetics, Inc.               |  | California         
|                                       | 
|Baldor Japan Corporation               |  | Japan              
|                                       | 
|Baldor Investments, LLC                |  | Delaware           
|                                       | 
|PowR Gard Generator Corp.             |  | Wisconsin          
|                                       | 
|Energy Dynamics, Inc.                  |  | Wisconsin          
|                                       | 
|Baldor Power Finance, Inc.             |  | Wisconsin          
|                                       | 
|Baldor Electric India Pvt Ltd          |  | India
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ("Quarterly Report") ofItronics Inc. (the "Registrant") for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of theundersigned, in their capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

 

Date: November 14, 2008                     /S/MICHAEL C. HORSLEY
                                            MichaelC. Horsley

                                            Controller

                                            (PrincipalAccounting Officer)

54
NATIONAL 

INDIAN 

GAMING 

CoMMlSSlON 

Daniel Ebby, Jr., Chairman 

Colorado River Indian Tribes 

Route 1, Box 23-B 

Parker, AZ 85344 

Dear Chairman Ebby: Il 

This letter responds to your request to review and approve 

the amendment to the Colorado River Indian Tribe's tribal gaming 

ordinance submitted on June 7, 1995. The amendment was adopted 

by Resolution No. 91-95 on May 5, 1995. The ordinance was 

approved by the Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commissia 

(NIGC) on September 14, 1994. The amendment does not require 

approval by the NIGC because the amendment addresses issues not 

raised in the IGRA or the NIGCfs regulations. 

Under the IGRA and the regulations of the NIGC, the Chairma 

is directed to review ordinances and amendments with respect to 

the requirements of the IGRA and the implementing regulations. 

Thus, the scope of the Chairman's review and approval is limited 

to the requirements of the IGRA and the NIGC regulations. 

Provisions other than those required under the IGRA or the NIGC 

regulations that may be included in a tribal ordinance are not 

subject to review and approval. 

Thank you for submitting the Colorado River Indian Tribe's , amendment for review. If you have questions or require further 

assistance, please contact Jessica J. Kachur at (202) 632-7003. 

/ ITHakolh . Monteau 

p1850 M STREET N W SUITE 250 \%A 

RESOLUTION NO. R- 91-95 

MAY 5, 1995 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tribal Council of the 

Colorado River Indian Tribes, that Section 201 

Definitions of the Tribes' Gaming Ordinance is hereby 

amended to include the following subsection: "ii "Gaming 

Floor" means the area where Gaming Devices and/or any 

areas designated for Bingo or Card Games. This provision 

shall not be construed to prohibit minors from passing 

through the Gaming Floor when accompanied by their parent 

or guardian." 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board is directed to establish 

policies to ensure that minor children are not left 

unattended within the Gaming Facility or allowed to 

loiter, with or without their parent or guardian, on the 

Gaming Floor; and 

BE IT FURTHER AND FINALLY RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary 

of the . Tribal Council, or their designated 

representatives, are hereby authorizedto execute any and 

all documents necessary to implement this action.
#### Dorrell R. COULTHRUST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden J. RASBEARY, Warden; Warden L. Bond, Warden; H. Bryan, Warden; J. Smith, Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-10568

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2006.

Dorrell R. Coulthrust, Cibola County Correctional Center, Milan, NM, pro se.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

*465PER CURIAM: *

Dorrell R. Coulthrust, federal prisoner # 15382-016, appeals from the district court’s interlocutory order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motions for leave to amend his complaint in his civil action under *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Coulthrust has not demonstrated that an order denying such a motion is an appealable interlocutory order. *See Briargrove Shopping Ctr. Joint Venture v. Pilgrim Enters., Inc.,*170 F.3d 536, 538 (5th Cir.1999). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain his appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
State of Arizona

Corporation Commission

seal

to all to whom these presents shall come greeting:

I, George S. Livermore, secretary of the arizona corporation commission,
do hereby certify that the annexed is a true and complete copy fo the
annual report for the gold ore mining company, which was filed in the
office of the arizona corporation commission, for the year ending
december 31, 1966, as provided by law.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,

I have heneunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
arizona corporation commission, at the capitol, in the
city of phoenix this 28th day of november 1967.

by

Assistant Secretary

Seal




certificate of renewal and extension of corporate existance of
the gold ore mining company

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

That by resolution duly and regularly passed and adopted by the
unanimous vote of the holders of 1,228,633 shares, being all of the
shares represented and present and more than a majority of the issued
and outstanding stock of gold ore mining company, a corporation organized
and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of arizona at a
special regularly and duly called and held for that purpost pursuant to
the by laws of said corporation and the laws of the state of arizona,
at the office of said corporation in Oatman, Mohave County, Arizona, on
the 10th day of March, 1936, the corporate existance of said corporation
was renewed and extended for the period of twenty five years from and
after March 11, 1936, up to and including march 11, 1961, and in
accordance therewith and for that purpose the articles of
incorporation of said corporation were amended by adding thereto article
AA to read as follows:

ARTICLE AA

On the 10th day of march, 1936, the corporate existance of said
corporation gold ore mining company was renewed and extended and such
renewal and extension shall be and is for the period of twenty five
years from and after March 11, 1936, up to and including March 11, 1961.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, we, the duly authorized officers af said gold ore
mining company, have hereunto set our hands on behalf of said corporation
and affexed the corpoarte seal of said corporation this 10th day
of March,  1936.

Gold Ore Mining Company

By W.B. Phelps
Its assistant Vice President and Director.
08/~7/98 FRI 16:00 FAX 605 867 1004 OST SECRETARY ~J002

ORDINANCE NO. 96-.2&

ORDINANCE OF THE OGLALA SIOUX TRIBAL COUNCIL

OF THE OGLALA SIOUX TRIBE

(An Unincorporated Tribe) A~

~1999 ORDINMCE OF THE OGLALA SIOUX TRIBAL COUNCIL AMENDING ORDThIANCE NO. 94-

01, THE GAMUTG CODE OF THE OGLALA SIOUX TRIBE, SECTION 4, GAMES

PERMITTED.

WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has enacted the Indian

Gaming Regulacory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 102 Stat, 2426, 25

U.S.C. 23701, cc seq. (1988), which permits Indian tribes to operate

Class III Gaming Activities on Indian reservations, pursuant to a TribalState Compact entered into for that purpose, and

WHEREAS, such authorization requires an amendment o~ Oglala Sioux

Tribal Council Ordinance No. 94-01, and

WHEREASJ the Oglala Sioux Tribal Council officers and

representatives ha,,e discussed this matter with the National Indian

Gaming Commission, now

THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, that the Oglala Sioux Tribal Council does

hereby amend OglalÆ Sioux Tribal Ordinance No. 94-01 by authorizing a

bingo operation, is~, Class II Gaming, as defined in the Indian Gaming

Regulatory A:t, 2~S U.S.C. § 2703 (7) (A) and by the regulations

promulgated by the National Indian Gaming Commission at 25 U.S.C. §502.3,

and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Ordinance No. 94-01, Section i, Games

Permitted, shall be amended to read as follows: Bingo, poker, blackjack,

and slot machines are expressly authorized by this Ordinance and such

other gaming as may be approved by legislative act of the State of South

Dakota- All gami–g authorized by this Ordinance may be operated and

maintained, within~ the boundaries of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation,

South Dakota, s~j:act to the provisions of this Ordinance. The Oglala

Sioux Tribe shall exclusively manage and operate all Class II Gaming

activities within the exterior boundaries of the Pine Ridge Reservation.

C-E-R.-T-I-F-I-C-A-T-I-O-N

I, as undersigned Recording Secretary of the Oglala Sioux Tribal Council,

hereby certify th4t this Ordinance was adopted by the vote of: fl for;

~ against; 2 abstain; and fl not voting, during a REGULM SESSION held

on the 2Ith day of JULY 1998.
* 08/~7/98 FRI 16:01 FAX 605 867 1004 OST SECRETARY ~003

ORDINANCE NO. 96-28

Page Two

STACY

~d~//~/

If.~iWO

~raM7 LANCE

~

Recording-Secretary

Oglala ~3ioux Tribe

A-T-T-E-S-T:

~L

R. MIL~O YELILOW

~

HAIR

Vice-President

Oglala Sioux Tribe
For Immediate Release Contact: NIGC 

 (202) 632-7003 

NIGC Announces Regulatory 

Review Tribal Consultations 

Washington, DC May 3, 2012 — The National Indian Gaming Commission 

(NIGC/Commission) announced today that it has scheduled five consultations in 

2012 as part of its continued Regulatory Review process. 

In April 2011, the Commission embarked on a regulatory review process that 

included tribal consultations throughout Indian Country. As a result, NIGC has 

posted several discussion draft rules on the NIGC website including, most 

recently, 25 CFR Part 543 and 25 CFR Part 547, which were formed by 

deliberative conversations with tribes and comments received by the public. The 

upcoming consultation sessions are a further opportunity for tribes to provide the 

Commission with substantive input during the next phases of the regulatory 

review process. 

The Commission invites all tribal leaders and their designees to share their views 

with the Commission during the following scheduled consultations: 

Consultation Date Event 

 June 7, 2012 Regulatory Review Group 3 

Radisson Hotel & Conference Center 

2040 Airport Road 

Green Bay, WI 

9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 

*Held immediately following the Class II 

Summit

June 11, 2012 Regulatory Review Group 3 

Riverwind Casino 

1544 W. State Hwy 9 

Norman, OK 

9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 

*Held immediately prior to the OK 

Sovereignty Symposium 
June 27, 2012 Regulatory Review Group 3 

Wild Horse Pass Hotel & Casino 

5040 Wild Horse Pass Blvd. 

Chandler, AZ 

9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 

July 11, 2012 Regulatory Review Group 3 

Cache Creek Casino Resort 

14455 Highway 16

Brooks, CA 

9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 

July 19, 2012 Regulatory Review Group 3 

Little Creek Casino Resort 

91 West State Route 108 

Shelton, Washington 

9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 

*Held immediately following the Northwest 

Indian Gaming Conference & Expo

Tribal consultations will include a discussion of the following regulations: 

Group 3: 

(a) Part 543 – Minimum Internal Control Standards for Class II Gaming; 

and 

(b) Part 547– Minimum Technical Standards for Gaming Equipment Used 

with the play of Class II Games. 

For planning purposes and to accommodate all who wish to attend the 

consultation, please RSVP to Rita Homa, Executive Secretary, at (202) 418-9807 

or by e-mail at consultation.rsvp@nigc.gov. 

For those tribal leaders or designees unable to attend these consultations, we 

invite you to submit written comments by e-mail to reg.review@nigc.gov, or by 

U.S. Mail to the National Indian Gaming Commission, Attn: Regulatory Review, 

1441 L Street, NW, Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005. 

 

Consistent with its commitment to transparency, the Commission will continue to 

consult with tribal governments throughout the regulatory review process. All 

information related to this review process can be found on our website at 

www.nigc.gov. Click on the Tribal Consultation tab on the left side of the 

website. 

The NIGC is an independent regulatory agency established within the Department of the Interior pursuant 

to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. 

###
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.6

                AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS OF
                          ASSURANCEAMERICA CORPORATION

                              ADOPTED JUNE 15, 2004

      1 The Amended and Restated By-laws of AssuranceAmerica Corporation, a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), are hereby amended by striking Section 6.1
thereof in its entirety and by replacing it with the following:

      Section 6.1 Number and Qualifications. The Board of Directors of the
      Corporation shall consist of at least one (1) but not more than ten (10)
      members, which number shall be determined, from time to time, by
      resolution adopted by the Board of Directors. Directors need not be
      residents of the State of Nevada or Shareholders of the Corporation.

      2 Except as hereby amended, the Amended and Restated By-laws of
AssuranceAmerica Corporation shall remain in full force and effect.

                                                  /s/ Robert J. Cormican
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Robert J. Cormican, Secretary
                                       34
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                           4,349
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                    4,502
<ALLOWANCES>                       (28)
<INVENTORY>                      1,434
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                10,854
<PP&E>                           5,274
<DEPRECIATION>                  (1,660)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  25,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            7,455
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                           273
<OTHER-SE>                      16,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    25,720
<SALES>                         13,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                13,574
<CGS>                            5,177
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   13,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (182)
<INCOME-TAX>                       378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (560)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                      (560)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (0.04)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50715

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE ALBERTO CECENA-VERELA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-2390-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jorge Alberto

Cecena-Verela raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3501 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3501

 To protect American job creation by striking the job-killing Federal 
                           employer mandate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 17, 2010

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To protect American job creation by striking the job-killing Federal 
                           employer mandate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Job Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECT JOB CREATION.

    Sections 1513 and 1514 and subsections (e), (f), and (g) of section 
10106 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (and the 
amendments made by such sections and subsections) are repealed and the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered as if 
such provisions and amendments had never been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-05-0108-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A JULY 22, 2005

______________________________ BALDEMAR ARMENDARIZ, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLE E

_________________________________ FROM THE 69TH DISTRICT COURT OF MOORE COUN TY; NO. 3603; HONORAB LE RON E NNS, JUD GE

_______________________________ Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and H ANCOCK, JJ.
ABATEMENT AND REMAND Following a plea of not guilty, appellant Baldema r A rmendariz was convicted by a jury of delivery of cocaine and punishment was assessed at 27 years confinement and a $10,000 fine. The clerk’s record and reporter’s record have both been fi led. Appellant’s brief was dueto be fil ed on Jun e 22, 200 5, b ut has yet to be filed. Also, no motion for2

extension of time has been filed. By letter dated June 29, 2005, this Court notified appellant’s appointed attorney, Thomas C. Moore, of the defect and also explained that i f
no response was received by July 11, 2005, the appeal would be abated pursuant to Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate P rocedure. Therefore, we now a bate this appeal and re mand the cau se to the trial court for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2 ) and (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall i mmediatelycause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing t o determine

the foll owing:
1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 2. whether

appointed counsel for appellant hasabandoned the appeal; and 3. whether appellant has been denied effective assi stance of counsel given hi s attorney's failu re to file a brief.
The tri al court shall cause a hearing to be transcribed . Should it be determin ed tha t appe llantdoe s want to continue the appeal and is indigent, then the trial court shall also take such measures as may be nece ssary t o assure appellant effective assistance of counsel, which measures may include the appointment of new counsel. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, tel epho ne number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be include d in the order app ointing new coun sel. Fin ally, thetrial co urtshall execute findings of fact, conclus ions of l aw, and s uch order s as the court

may enter regarding the aforementioned issues and caus e its findings and conclusions to be i ncluded in a3

supplemental clerk's record. A supplemental record of the hearing sh all also be included in the appellate record. Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and the supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk of this Court by Friday, September 2, 2005.
It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.