alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
onfolio_ex103.htm

EXHIBIT 10.3
  
 Amendment No. 1
 to
 Onfolio Holdings Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan
  
 On August 11, 2022, Onfolio Holdings Inc. effectuated a 1-for-4.7619 reverse split of its common stock, so that each 4.7619 shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to August 11, 2022 was combined and converted into one (1) share of common stock. As a result of the reverse split, the Onfolio Holdings Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows (capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the respective meaning ascribed to such terms in the Plan):
  
  
 	  
	 1.
	 Section 4.1 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



 
 
  
  
 	  
	 4.1
	 Subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 11, no more than 2,600,000 shares of Common Stock shall be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan (the "Total Share Reserve"); however, at the time of any grant of Awards under the Plan, no more than the lesser of (i) the Total Share Reserve, or (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock equal to 20% of the total shares of Common Stock outstanding at the time of any such grant of Awards under the Plan, shall be available for the grant of Awards under the Plan. During the terms of the Awards, the Company shall keep available at all times the number of shares of Common Stock required to satisfy such Awards.



 
 
  
  
 	  
	 2.
	 Section 4.3 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



 
 
  
  
 	  
	 4.3
	 Subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 11, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued in the aggregate pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Stock Options is equal to the number of shares of Common Stock available for the grant of Awards under the Plan (the "ISO Limit").



 
 
  
  
 	  
	 3.
	 All other provisions of the Plan remain in full force and effect, other than any provision that conflicts with the terms and spirit of this amendment.



 
 
  
 Adopted by the Board of Directors on August 15, 2022.
  
 Adopted by the stockholders on August 15, 2022.
Exhibit 32.1
  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Stanley Tepper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
 the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Steve Westlund
 Steve Westlund
 Chief Executive Officer, President
 and Chief Accounting Officer
 December 23, 2003
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Balchem Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dino A. Rossi,
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Dino A. RossiDino
      A. RossiChairman,
      President, andChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)March
      17, 2008





This
certification accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-K pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.










70
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at March 31, 1999 (Unaudited)
and the Consoliated Statement of Income for the three months ended March
31, 1999 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,484
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,274,464
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,288
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,288)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
- 2861-6.pdf
- 2861-1.pdf
March 18, 2020 

VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL AND E-MAIL 

Virgil Lewis, Chairman 

Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation 

401 Fort Road 

Toppenish, WA 98948 

Re: Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation 

 Gaming Ordinance Amendment 

Dear Chairman Lewis: 

This letter responds to your request for the National Indian Gaming Commission 

Chairman to review and approve an amendment to the Nation’s amended gaming ordinance. The 

Yakama Tribal Council amended the Nation’s gaming ordinance on December 4, 2019 by 

Resolution T-015-20. 

The amended gaming ordinance updates the definition of key employee, and vests the 

Yakama Tribal Council with the authority to approve future amendments to the Nation’s gaming 

ordinance. 

Thank you for bringing the amended ordinance to our attention and for providing us with 

a copy. The amended ordinance is approved as it is consistent with the Indian Gaming 

Regulatory Act and NIGC regulations. If you have any questions, please contact Rea Cisneros, 

Associate General Counsel at (202) 632-7003. 

Sincerely, 

E. Sequoyah Simermeyer 

Chairman 

Cc: Ethan Jones, Lead Attorney, Yakama Nation Office of Legal Counsel
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

(PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

 

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code)

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of Apogee Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), does hereby certify, that:

 

Thequarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006(the “Form 10-QSB”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Dated:  May 15, 2006 | /s/    | Herbert M. Stein                           |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Herbert M. Stein                           |
|                      |   | Chairman of the Board,                     |
|                      |   | President, Chief Executive Officer         |
|                      |   | (principal executive officer)              |
|                      |   |                                       |
|                      |   |                                       |
| Dated:  May 15, 2006 | /s/    | Paul J. Murphy                             |   |
|                      |   | Paul J. Murphy                             |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President |
|                      |   | Finance (principal financial officer and   |
|                      |   | principal accounting officer)              |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
97-157.

#### State v. Bowser.

Greene App. No. 95CA82. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Resnick, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Applied Minerals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Andre Zeitoun, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:   March 15, 2012
By:
/s/  ANDRE ZEITOUNAndre ZeitounChief Executive Officer
{"agency":"NIGC","generated":"2015-02-26 16:39:58","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"}],"value":"2014"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["NIGC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["16"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["15"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["21"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2014","quarter":"Q2"}
**LETTER IN LIEU OF CONSENT FOR REVIEWREPORT**
August 8, 2003
Nextel Communications, Inc.2001 Edmund Halley DriveReston, Virginia
     We have made a review, in accordance withstandards established by the American Institute of CertifiedPublic Accountants, of the unaudited interim financialinformation of Nextel Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries (the“Company”) for the three-month and six-month periodsended June 30, 2003 and for the three-month period endedMarch 31, 2003, as indicated in our reports datedAugust 8, 2003 and May 14, 2003; because we did notperform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.
     We are aware that our reports referred to above,which are included in your Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and for the quarterended March 31, 2003, are incorporated by reference inPost-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration StatementNo. 33-91716 on Form S-8 to Form S-4 of NextelCommunications, Inc., Registration Statement No. 333-06521of Nextel Communications, Inc. on Form S-8, RegistrationNo. 333-06523 of Nextel Communications, Inc. onForm S-8, Post-Effective Amendment No.1 to RegistrationStatement No. 333-26369 on Form S-8 to Form S-4of Nextel Communications, Inc., Registration StatementNo. 333-42537 of Nextel Communications, Inc. onForm S-8, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 toRegistration Statement No. 333-53429 of NextelCommunications, Inc. on Form S-8, Registration StatementNo. 333-69312 of Nextel Communications, Inc. onForm S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-1290 ofNextel Communications, Inc. on Form S-4, and RegistrationStatement No. 333-104076 on Form S-3.
     We are also aware that the aforementioned report,pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933,is not considered a part of the Registration prepared orcertified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified byan accountant with the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of thatAct.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
McLean, Virginia
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 1 4 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk February 1 4 , 2019

15 8 599 ( 124 ) (130)(132)

In re RHEA BRODY LIVING TRUST, dated

January 17, 1978, as amended.

_________________________________________

ROBERT BRODY and JAY BRODY,

Intervenors

- Appellants,

SC: 158599

v COA: 330871

Oakland PC: 2015

- 361379

- TV

CATHY B. DEUTCHMAN,

Petitioner

- Appellee,

and

MICHAEL BARTON, Special Fiduciary,

Intervenor

. _________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of conservator and successor trustee Mary

Lyneis to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED

. Th e amicus brief submitted on

December 17, 2018, is accepted for filing. On further order of the Chief Justice, the motion

of appellants to file a response to the amicus brief and the motion of appellee to file a

response to the amicus brief and to appellan ts’ response are GRANTED. The responses

filed by appellants and appellee on January 29, 2019, and February 1, 2019, respectively,

are accepted for filing.
.

Zachariah Pahmahmie

Tribal Council Chainnan

Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation

16281 Q Road

Mayetta, KS 66509

APR2 1 2005

RE: Amendment of Prairie Band ofPotawatomi Nation Gaming Ordinance

Dear Chainnan:

This letter is in response to your request for the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC)

to review and approve an amendment to the Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation Gaming

Ordinance. The Tribal Council approved this amendment by Resolution 2005-004 on January

10, 2005.

This letter constitutes such approval of this amendment under the Indian Gaming Regulatory

Act (IGRA). It is important to note that the amendment is approved for gaming only on

Indian lands, as defined in the IGRA, over which the Tribe has jurisdiction and exercises its

governmental power.

We note that in its amendment the Tribe's definition of "ancillary facilities" can be

interpreted as including any physical structure or area separate from the gaming facility where

gaming activity may be conducted on an intennittent basis. If such gaming occurs, the Tribe

should issue a separate license for gaming at each separate location, 25 C.F.R. § 522.4(6), and

pay feesfor ~te gaming operation,see 25 C.F.R. §§ 502.10 and 514.1.

cc: David Prager III, Tribal attorney

NATIONALHEADQUARTERS1441 LSt. NW, Suite 9100. Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 WWW.NIGC.GOV

REGIONALOFFICES Portland. OR; Sacramento. CA; Phoenix. AZ; St. Paul. MN; Tulsa. OK
Exhibit
10.2


 


AMENDMENT
TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC. 2021 INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN 


 


This
Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions, Inc. 2021 Incentive Stock Plan (the “Plan”)
is effective as of August 14, 2022 (“Effective Date”).


 


WHEREAS
the Board of Directors of the Corporation and Consenting Shareholder Steven Reinharz have approved the following Amendment
to the Plan:


 


Amendment
to Section 5(b) of the Plan amending the maximum number of shares appliable to the Plan from 5,000,000 to 100,000,000:


 


From
(as stated in Original Plan).


 


“Number
of Shares: Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 6(i) or Section 11 of the Plan, the total number of shares of Stock which may
be purchased or granted directly by Options, Stock Awards or Restricted Stock Purchase Offers, or purchased indirectly through exercise
of Options granted under the Plan shall not exceed five million (5,000,000) shares. If any Grant shall for any reason terminate or expire,
any shares allocated thereto but remaining unpurchased upon such expiration or termination shall again be available for Grants with respect
thereto under the Plan as though no Grant had previously occurred with respect to such shares. Any shares of Stock issued pursuant to
a Grant and repurchased pursuant to the terms thereof shall be available for future Grants as though not previously covered by a Grant.”


 


Amended
to state: 


 


Number
of Shares: Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 6(i) or Section 11 of the Plan, the total number of shares of Stock which may
be purchased or granted directly by Options, Stock Awards or Restricted Stock Purchase Offers, or purchased indirectly through exercise
of Options granted under the Plan shall not exceed 100 million (100,000,000) shares. If any Grant shall for any reason terminate or expire,
any shares allocated thereto but remaining unpurchased upon such expiration or termination shall again be available for Grants with respect
thereto under the Plan as though no Grant had previously occurred with respect to such shares. Any shares of Stock issued pursuant to
a Grant and repurchased pursuant to the terms thereof shall be available for future Grants as though not previously covered by a Grant.


 


The
undersigned, an authorized office of the Corporation, has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the Effective Date.


 


	ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC.	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Steven
    Reinharz	 
	 	Steven Reinharz,
    Chief Executive Officer
#### DUBLIN DISTRIBUTORS, Inc. v. BREWING CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

May 6, 1948.

Godfrey & Marx, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Clark, Carr & Ellis, of New York City (Paul A. Crouch, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Brewing Corporation of America.

HULBERT, District Judge.

This action was removed here from the New York Supreme Court, New York County, on or about Feb. S, 1948, by the defendant Brewing Corporation of America, which thereafter interposed its answer to the complaint on or about Feb. IS, 1948. Annexed to the answer were interrogatories pro-pounded to the plaintiff to be answered under oath. See Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 33, Title 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

No objections were presented to the court and no copy of answers to said interrogatories were served on the moving defendant within the period specified in said Rule and no extension of time was requested and agreed to, except that on April 19th, 1948 the attorneys for the moving defendant did sign a stipulation extending the time of the plaintiff to answer said interrogatories to May 21st, 1948, but there was deleted from such stipulation the words “or move with respect to” said interrogatories. But thereafter, on April 23rd, 1948, plaintiff’s attorneys served a. notice of the taking of the deposition of the moving defendant by its President, or if no longer so employed, by its Assistant Sales Manager, on the 3rd day of May, 1948 before a Notary Public.

The defendant moves to vacate said notice, or in the alternative, to stay the examination pursuant to plaintiff’s notice until the plaintiff has served its answers to the interrogatories.

It is urged by the plaintiff that it is necessary to examine the defendant in order that the plaintiff may answer said interrogatories. No facts are set forth to substantiate this contention. On the contrary, the elimination from the stipulation of April 19th of the words “or move with respect to” is rather persuasive that plaintiff sought the opportunity to comply with the requirements of Rule 33, F.R.C.P. without then disclosing that it had any realization of the necessity for or the intent to take the deposition of the moving defendant in order to answer said interrogatories.

Motion to stay the examination of the moving defendant will be granted until the plaintiff has answered the interrogatories in accordance with Rule 33, supra. Settle order on notice.
EXHIBIT 23.1











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-74255, No. 333-87786 and No. 333-140781) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-92388, as amended, and No. 333-117534) of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. of our report dated November 25, 2009 relating to the consolidated
financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders which is filed herewith and incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




















/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Houston, Texas


November 25, 2009