alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(a)

CERTIFICATIONS

** 
I, J. Wayne Leonard, certify that:  
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Entergy Corporation;  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:   
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   
b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;   
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

		/s/ J. Wayne Leonard			

**
EXHIBIT 23.1

 

Consent of Independent Auditors 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-8 No. 333-07135, No. 333-89029, No. 333-28991, No. 333-70616 and No. 333-70618) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1996 Stock Option Plan, 401(k) Salary Reduction Plan and Trust and the 2001 Stock Option Plan of RibozymePharmaceuticals, Inc., and in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-66092 and No. 333-75976) of Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated February 22, 2002, except for Note 1 under the caption Restatement of Financial Informationand Note 5 under the caption Series A Preferred Stock, as to which the date is February 10, 2003, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, with respect to the financial statements, as amended, included in thisForm 10-K/A. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Denver, Colorado 

February 10, 2003
No. 532.

#### Centers *v.*Sanford, Warden.

Argued March 4, 1942.

Decided March 9, 1942.

*Per Curiam:*

Upon consent of the Government, the judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with permission to both parties to reopen the case for the purpose of taking further evidence with respect to all issues in the case, and for find*785ings on those issues, including whether petitioner consulted with appointed counsel, whether sueh counsel appeared in court with him, or whether he waived such consultation or appearance, and whether he understood the charge to which he pleaded guilty.

*Mr. Paul Crutch-field,*with whom *Mr. Augustus M. Roan*was on the brief, for petitioner. *Mr. Herbert Wechsler*argued the. cause, and *Assistant Attorney General Berge*and *Messrs. War-, ner W. Gardner*and *W. Marvin Smith*were on the brief, for respondent.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dominix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 26, 2002 (the "Report"), I, James
W. Zimbler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ James W. Zimbler
--------------------------------------
James W. Zimbler
Chief Executive Officer and
  Chief Financial Officer
November 26, 2002
EXHIBIT 10.3





                  MISCELLANEOUS FRINGE BENEFITS FOR EXECUTIVES





   BLANKET TRAVEL ACCIDENT INSURANCE

   For those employees who are required to travel in carrying out their job
   responsibilities, the Company provides at no cost a travel accident
   insurance plan.  The coverage is based on position and title with Senior
   Vice Presidents insured for $200,000 and the Chairman of the Board for
   $400,000.  This plan provides coverage for accidental death while
   traveling and while away from home on Company business.



   PERSONAL EXCESS LIABILITY POLICIES

   The Company reimburses certain executive officers for the cost of personal
   excess liability policies.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. C E DR I C R OB E R S ON , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 12- 10480 D. C. No . 2 : 1 0 - c r - 0 0 2 1 1 - GEB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G a r l a nd E . B urr e l l , J r . , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 16, 2013 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , IK U T A , an d W A T F O R D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C edri c R ob er son app ea l s f rom the di stri ctcourt ’ s j ud gm entand chal l enges the 22 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for c on spi ra cy t o de f r a ud the gove rnm e nt , i n vi ol a t i on of 18 U . S . C . § 286. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on



# FI LED APR22 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 10480 2 u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f i r m. R obe r s on c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc our tc l e a r l y e rr e d w he n i tappl i e d a thr e e - l e ve l a ggr a va t i ng r ol e e nha nc e m e ntunde rU . S . S . G . § 3B 1. 1( b) . R obe r s on ar gu es thatthe re cord do es no tsupp orta f i nd i ng thathe se rved as ei ther am anager ors upe r vi s orbe c a us e the r e w a s no e vi de nc e t o s how tha the di r e c t e d, m a na ge d or s upe r vi s e d a ny othe rpa r t i c i pa nti n the of f e ns e . C ontr a ry t o R obe r s on’ s c ont e nt i on, the r e c or d r e f

l e c t s tha the r e c rui t e d a nd s upe r vi s e d othe r s i n the c om m i s s i on of the o f f e n s e . T h e r e f

o r e , th e c o u r t d id n o t c le a r ly e rrin ap p ly in g th e a d ju s tm e n t. See U ni t ed Stat es v. R i l ey , 3 3 5 F .3 d 9 1 9 , 9 2 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ( a g g r a v a tin g r o le e nha nc e m e nti s w a rr a nt e d w he r e the de f e nda ntw a s “ r e s pons i bl e f oror ga ni z i ng others for the pu rpose of c arry i ng ou tthe cr i m e” ) ( i nt ernal qu ot at i on s om m i tt ed); U ni t e d Stat e s v . E

gge , 223 F . 3d 1128, 1131 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( s t a t i ng s t a nda r d of re vi ew ). R obe r s on al so cont ends thatthe di stri ctcourtshou l d b e ordere d t o con si der h is e n title m e n t to a m in o rr o le a d ju s tm e n t o n r e m a n d . W e d o n o t r e a c h th is cont ent i on i n l i gh tof ou r di sposi t i on abov e. AF F I RME D.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 14 (Friday, January 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1356]



[[Page 4178]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2281-011-CA; Project No. 4851-005-CA]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Availability of 
Environmental Assessment

January 14, 2009.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed the applications for new licenses for 
the Woodleaf-Kanaka Junction and Sly Creek transmission line projects, 
located near the South Fork Feather River, in Butte County, California, 
and has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for the projects. The 
projects occupy approximately 105 acres, which includes approximately 
34 acres that are administered by the Forest Supervisor of the Plumas 
National Forest.
    The EA contains staff's analysis of the potential environmental 
impacts of the projects and alternatives and concludes that licensing 
the projects, with appropriate environmental protective measures, would 
not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect 
the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the EA is available for review at the Commission in the 
Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at 
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket 
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#80c6c5d2c3cfeeece9eee5d3f5f0f0eff2f4c0e6e5f2e3aee7eff6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="40060512030f2e2c292e25133530302f323400262532236e272f36">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, 
(202) 502-8659.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and 
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, 
contact FERC Online Support.
    For further information, contact Lesley Kordella at (202) 502-6406.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-1356 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Aurora Associates, LLC, Respondent, v Laura Marquez, Appellant, et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 11, 2012;

decided August 30, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain the motion for leave to appeal from the order of the Appellate Division entered in this proceeding commenced in Civil Court (see NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [7]; CPLR 5602 [a]). Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Stacia N. Almquist, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Union Security Insurance Company; 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 12, 2008
----

----

|   |                                               |  /s/ Herbert M.      Stein                                                                                                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  Dated:  August      18, 2010  |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |  ___________________________________________                                                                                    |
|   |                                               |  Herbert M.      Stein                                                                                                          |
|   |                                               |  Chief      Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer)                                                       |
|   |                                               |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |  /s/ Paul J.      Murphy                                                                                                        |
|   |  Dated:  August      18, 2010  |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |  ___________________________________________                                                                                    |
|   |                                               |  Paul J.      Murphy                                                                                                            |
|   |                                               |  Chief      Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance (principal financial      officer and principal accounting officer) |
|   |                                               |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |                                                                                                                                 |

----

----
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

97-946.

#### Smith v. Serva-Portion, Inc.

In this case, appellant has filed two appeals involving entries entered by the Hamilton County Court of Appeals in case Nos. C-961075, C-961121, C-970024, C-970071 and C-961105 on March 28, 1997. In the entries, the court of appeals overruled appellant’s motions to extend time because appellant failed to provide any readable or intelligible reason within the motions; struck appellant’s “many other filings” as being unreadable and unintelligible; and *sua sponte,*dismissed the appeals for appellant’s failure to show cause why he had failed to comply with the Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure. Upon review of the documents appellant has filed in this case, this court finds that the appeals are not reasonably well grounded in fact or warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification or reversal of existing law.

This case is the seventh appeal filed by James Smith in this court in which Serva-Portion, Inc. is the appellee. In addition, appellant has filed fourteen appeals in which the Ohio Department of Human Services is the appellee. This court has declined jurisdiction in and/or dismissed all of the prior appeals. Furthermore, on October 23, 1996, this court limited appellant’s filings in connection with Clermont County Court of Appeals case No. CA96-05-045, *James Smith v. Ohio Department of Human Services,*to one notice of appeal to appeal the final decision of the court of appeals.

Upon consideration of the above, and pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(5), this court finds that the appeals filed herein are frivolous and that James Smith has abused his *in forma pauperis*status by filing numerous frivolous appeals. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk of this court shall not accept for filing any additional appeals from James Smith unless accompanied by the docket fee required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XV.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6244

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
RASHAUN ALLEN JUDGE , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 2:17

- cr - 00301

- RMG

- 1 )

Submitted : August 29 , 2023 Decided: September 1, 2023

Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Rashaun Allen Judge, Appellant Pro Se. Emily Evans Limehouse, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not bindin g precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6244 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Rashaun Allen Judge appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of dis cretion. United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021 ). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial. See United
States v. High , 997 F.3d 181, 188

- 91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of compassionate release motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6244 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
----

**Subsidiaries**

|  **Name**                                    |  **State                of Incorporation** | **Percentage                of Voting****Securities                Owned****by                Registrant** |
|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Angelica                Realty Co.                | California                                      |                   100%                                                                           |
| Angelica                Textile Services, Inc.    | California                                      | 100                                                                                                        |
| Angelica                Textile Services, Inc.    | New                York                         | 100                                                                                                        |
| Royal                Institutional Services, Inc. | Massachusetts                                   | 100                                                                                                        |
| The                Surgi-Pack Corporation         | Massachusetts                                   | 100                                                                                                        |
| Southern                Service Company           | California                                      | 100                                                                                                        |