alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3473 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3473

 To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to authorize advances from Oil 
    Spill Liability Trust Fund for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 9, 2010

     Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 
              considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to authorize advances from Oil 
    Spill Liability Trust Fund for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADVANCES FROM OIL SPILL LIABILITY TRUST FUND FOR DEEPWATER 
              HORIZON OIL SPILL.

    Section 6002(b) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2752) 
is amended in the second sentence--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``Coast Guard''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``and (2) in the case of the discharge of oil that 
        began in 2010 in connection with the explosion on, and sinking 
        of, the mobile offshore drilling unit Deepwater Horizon, may, 
        without further appropriation, obtain 1 or more advances from 
        the Fund as needed, up to a maximum of $100,000,000 for each 
        advance, with the total amount of all advances not to exceed 
        the amounts available under section 9509(c)(2) of the Internal 
        Revenue Code of 1986, and within 7 days of each advance, shall 
        notify Congress of the amount advanced and the facts and 
        circumstances necessitating the advance''.

SEC. 2. BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go-Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,701
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,460)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          96,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                (75,124)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         14,956
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,931
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,526
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,966
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (9)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000                 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         192408
<SECURITIES>                                     1039
<RECEIVABLES>                                  548689
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8129
<INVENTORY>                                    383281
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1185144
<PP&E>                                        4461318
<DEPRECIATION>                                2187230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                4120349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          672557
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       614443
<OTHER-SE>                                    1122502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  4120349
<SALES>                                       2696694
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              2696694
<CGS>                                         2089305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2089305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               303950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1992
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              76442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                322754
<INCOME-TAX>                                    99924
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            222830
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   138336
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    3.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    3.23
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3346 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3346

 To increase the limits on liability under the Outer Continental Shelf 
                               Lands Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2010

Mr. Whitehouse (for himself and Mr. Menendez) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To increase the limits on liability under the Outer Continental Shelf 
                               Lands Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 
Amendments Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. REMEDIES AND PENALTIES UNDER THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF LANDS 
              ACT.

    (a) Civil Penalties.--Section 24(b) of the Outer Continental Shelf 
Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1350(b)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence of paragraph (1), by striking 
        ``$20,000'' and inserting ``$75,000''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``may be assessed'' and 
        inserting ``of not more than $150,000 for each day of the 
        continuance of the failure shall be assessed''; and
    (b) Criminal Penalties.--The first sentence of section 24(c) of the 
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1350(c)) is amended by 
striking ``$100,000'' and inserting ``$10,000,000''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) take 
effect on April 15, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

JOHN FRANCIS BRISCOE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM SMITH, Warden; PARRIS N.

GLENDENING, Governor;

KATHLEEN K. TOWNSEND, Lieutenant;

No. 95-7720

BISHOP L. ROBINSON, Secretary of

Public Safety; RICHARD LANHAM,

Parole Commissioner; PAUL DAVIS,

Deputy Commissioner; DAN D.

ZACCOGNINI, Commissioner; MICHAEL

BLOUNT, Commissioner,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.

(CA-95-2791-DKC)

Submitted: February 20, 1996

Decided: March 12, 1996

Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed in part and vacated and remanded in part by unpublished

per curiam opinion.
COUNSEL

John Francis Briscoe, Appellant Pro Se.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

John Francis Briscoe, a Maryland inmate, claimed in this 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (1988) action that he was improperly denied parole in August

1995. He also alleged that his next parole eligibility hearing was

scheduled for 1997, although he previously had received annual hearings. The district court dismissed the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(d) (1988). We affirm in part and vacate and remand in part.

Briscoe's claim concerning the timing of his parole eligibility

reviews is sufficient to survive dismissal under§ 1915(d). If there was

a statutory or regulatory amendment which altered the definition of

criminal conduct or increased the penalty by which a crime is punishable, that amendment should be analyzed for a possible ex post facto

violation. See California Dep't of Corrections v. Morales, 63

U.S.L.W. 4327 (U.S. Apr. 25, 1995) (No. 93-1462). The record is

devoid of any reference to any such amendment or regulation, rendering it impossible to conduct an analysis under Morales. We therefore

vacate the district court's decision with regard to this claim and

remand for an analysis of the claim under the factors set forth in

Morales.

To the extent that Briscoe appeals the district court's remaining

findings, we have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Briscoe v. Smith, No. CA-95-2791-DKC (D. Md.

Sept. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

 2
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART 

 3
Order entered December 3, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01649-CV

IN RE MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES CORPORATION, Appellant

Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-02198

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Phillip Huggins, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 671]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obús, J., at suppression hearing; Thomas Farber, J., at plea and sentencing), rendered November 15, 2011, convicting defendant of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence. An officer saw defendant engaging in conduct that reasonably appeared to be robbery, rather than horseplay as defendant now suggests. Accordingly, the officer had probable cause for an arrest, which does not require exclusion of all *421hypotheses of innocence *(see e.g. People v Lewis,*50 AD3d 595 [2008], *lv denied*11 NY3d 790 [2008]). Concur — Andrias, J.E, Acosta, Moskowitz, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Cochran, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 921]

Rose, J.E

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered December 16, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

*998Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree in full satisfaction of a seven-count indictment and waived his right to appeal. In accordance with the plea agreement, County Court thereafter sentenced him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate prison term of 12 years, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. By entering a knowing, voluntary and intelligent guilty plea before a suppression hearing was held, defendant forfeited his right to appellate review of his sole contention on appeal, that his arrest arose out of an unlawful search and seizure *(see People v Buckler,*80 AD3d 889, 890 [2011], *lv denied,*17 NY3d 804 [2011]; *People v Costa,*4 AD3d 675, 676 [2004], *lv denied 2*NY3d 797 [2004]; *People v Huff,*257 AD2d 678, 679 [1999], *lv denied*93 NY2d 854 [1999]). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Spain, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ, concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3365 

To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 

any hours worked by Federal firefighters under a qualified trade-oftime arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations relating to overtime pay. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2010 

Mr. WEBB introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to 

provide that any hours worked by Federal firefighters 

under a qualified trade-of-time arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations relating to overtime pay. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF HOURS WORKED UNDER A 

4 TRADE-OF-TIME ARRANGEMENTS. 

5 Section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3365 IS

1 ‘‘(g)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this 

2 section, any hours worked by a firefighter under a quali3 fied trade-of-time arrangement shall be disregarded for 

4 purposes of any determination relating to eligibility for or 

5 the amount of any overtime pay under this section. 

6 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this section— 

7 ‘‘(A) the term ‘qualified trade-of-time arrange8 ment’ means an arrangement under which 2 fire9 fighters who are employed by the same agency 

10 agree, solely at their option and with the approval 

11 of their employing agency, to substitute for one an12 other during scheduled work hours in performance 

13 of work in the same capacity; and 

14 ‘‘(B) the term ‘firefighter’ has the meaning 

15 given such term by sections 8331(21) and 8401(14), 

16 respectively.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
----

|                                    | /s/      Herbert M. Stein                                                                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:  January      15, 2010 | ___________________________________________                                                                                   |
|                                    | Herbert      M. Stein                                                                                                         |
|                                    | Chief      Executive Officer and President (principal executive    officer)                                                   |
|                                    |                                                                                                                          |
|                                    |                                                                                                                          |
|                                    | /s/      Paul J. Murphy                                                                                                       |
| Dated:  January      15, 2010 | ___________________________________________                                                                                   |
|                                    | Paul      J. Murphy                                                                                                           |
|                                    | Chief      Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance (principal financial      officer and principal accountingofficer) |

----
EXHIBIT 15

            Letter Regarding Unaudited Interim Financial Information


To the Board of Directors
AquaPenn Spring Water Company, Inc.:

     Re: Registration Statement No. 333-49123 and No. 333-51659

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated May 8, 1998 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of Section 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,


KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


State College, PA
May 8, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Entergy
Arkansas' financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000007323
<NAME> ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER> 001
   <NAME> ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,803,386
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    319,569
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         464,744
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       418,952
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,006,651
<COMMON>                                           470
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      590,134
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            487,855
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,078,459
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           82,027
<PREFERRED>                                    116,350
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,172,285
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 667
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,094
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     80,936
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                64,068
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,410,765
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,006,651
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,608,698
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            71,374
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,353,883
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,353,883
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        254,815
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              19,990
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 274,805
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        92,480
<NET-INCOME>                                   110,951
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     10,201
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  100,750
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        92,600
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       95,050
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         357,116
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




The
undersigned, Michael McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of The Fairchild
Corporation (“Company”), hereby certifies that (1) the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-K for the Annual Period Ended September 30, 2007 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the
results of operations of the Company.






Date:
            
            March 4,
      2008/s/
            MICHAEL
      MCDONALDMichael
      McDonaldSenior Vice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer
II 

Calendar No. 384 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3200 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

23 Genesee Street in Hornell, New York, as the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2010 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, New York, 

as the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ZACHARY SMITH POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3200 RS

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Zachary 

2 Smith Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, or other record of the United States 

5 to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 

6 to be a reference to the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post Office Build7 ing’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 384 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3200 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. Hornell, New York, as the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post al Service located at 23 Genesee Street in 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS