alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 1


                             AMENDMENT TO
                         ANGELICA CORPORATION
                  DEFERRED COMPENSATION OPTION PLAN
                  FOR SELECTED MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES


     The Deferred Compensation Option Plan for Selected Management
Employees (the "Plan") is amended, effective as of February 1,
1997, in the following particulars:


                                  I.

     Section 2.1(x)(ii) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its
entirety and the following is substituted in lieu thereof:


     "(ii) As to benefits attributable to Deferrals made
           on or after January 1, 1986, the percentage (not to
           exceed one-hundred percent (100%)) determined by
           dividing (A) the number of full and fractional
           years elapsed from the effective date of the
           Participant's Deferred Compensation Agreement to
           the date of determination, by (B) the number of
           full and fractional years from the effective date
           of the Participant's initial Deferred Compensation
           Agreement to the Participant's Normal Retirement
           Date; provided that, no Participant shall be vested
           before he or she completes five (5) years of
           continuous service as an Employee.  Anything
           contained herein to the contrary notwithstanding,
           to determine the number of full and fractional
           years calculated in (A) above with respect to a
           Participant whose employment terminates with the
           Company, is reemployed with the Company and who
           again becomes an Active Participant in the Plan
           before any payment of his benefit to which he is
           entitled under the Plan is paid to him, only the
           number of full and fractional years during which
           the such Participant is an Employee shall be
           counted."


                                 II.

     Section 3.3 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and
the following is substituted in lieu thereof:

     "3.3  Participation.
      ------------------
     An Employee shall become an Active Participant as of the
     date on which his or her Deferred Compensation Agreement
     becomes effective."



<PAGE> 2

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parent Company has caused this Plan to
be amended by signature of its duly authorized officer this 25th
day of February, 1997.

                              ANGELICA CORPORATION


                              By /s/ L. J. Young
                                 -------------------------------------
                                 Chairman of the Board

                                    -2-
(October 31, 2006)

#### David Jones et al., Appellants-Respondents, v West 56th Street Associates et al., Defendants, Cityspire Condominium et al., Respondents, and Cityspire Centre LLC, Also Known as Cityspire Center LLC, Respondent-Appellant. Liberty Marble, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v All City Marble Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (And Another Action.)

[825 NYS2d 182]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered July 26, 2004, which to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment under Labor Law § 240 (1) against defendants Cityspire Condominium, Cityspire Centre LLC, Zeckendorf Realty L.R and Liberty Marble, Inc. and denied the Cityspire defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs’ motion with respect to Zeckendorf Realty was properly denied since there are issues of fact as to whether Zeckendorf was a statutory agent with authority to supervise and control plaintiffs work *(see Walls v Turner Constr. Co.,*4 NY3d 861, 863-864 [2005]; *Russin v Louis N. Picciano & Son,*54 NY2d 311, 318 [1981]). Similarly, there is insufficient evidence to conclude as a matter of law that Liberty Marble, a subcontractor, had authority to supervise or control plaintiffs work *(see Walsh v Sweet Assoc.,*172 AD2d 111, 113 [1991], *lv denied*79 NY2d 755 [1992]). Although plaintiff is correct that the Cityspire defendants are owners for purposes of assigning liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) *(see Coleman v City of New York,*91 NY2d 821, 822 [1997]; *Gordon v Eastern Ry. Supply,*82 NY2d 555, 560 [1993]), summary judgment as to liability on the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim was properly denied since an is*552sue of fact exists as to the manner of the accident, and whether plaintiffs alleged injury was caused by a fall from a scaffold (see *Maldonado v Townsend Ave. Enters., Ltd. Partnership,*294 AD2d 207 [2002]; *Eitner v 119*W *71st St. Owners Corp.,*253 AD2d 641 [1998]; *Saaverda v East Fordham Rd. Real Estate Corp.,*233 AD2d 125 [1996]; *Manna v New York City Hous. Auth.,*215 AD2d 335 [1995]). Plaintiff testified in deposition that he lost his balance and fell off the scaffold when the saw he was using to cut stone “binded up.” However, the day after the alleged accident plaintiff reported to his supervisor that he wrenched his back and made no mention of a fall from a scaffold. Nor did he mention a fall from a scaffold when he sought treatment from a chiropractor a few days later. Notably, plaintiff did not submit an affidavit from the coworker who was allegedly present at the time of the accident. In these circumstances, a factual issue is raised as to whether a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) was a proximate cause of plaintiffs injury.

We have considered the parties’ remaining arguments for affirmative relief and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Friedman, Sullivan and Sweeny, JJ.
*Wednesday, February 26, 1997*

MERIT DOCKET

96-2348.

#### State ex rel. Martin v. Anderson.

Richland App. No. 96CA43. On motion to strike appellant’s merit brief. Motion granted; *sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      204
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,877
<PP&E>                                           7,648
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,867
<BONDS>                                          2,170
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,844
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,130
<SALES>                                            575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,201
<CGS>                                            2,617
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,185)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,185)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.44)
        

</TABLE>
#### Max BOGAEV and Harold Jacoby, a partnership trading as Arrow Display Associates, v. MURTA, APPLETON CO., Inc.

Civ. A. No. 17876.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. 26, 1955.

*438Harry Langsam, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Robert N. Perrer, Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

The objections to interrogatories Nos. 3, 4 and 5 are sustained.

 Although it is well settled that an interrogatory is not objectionable merely because the opinion sought is not strictly relevant, in the evidentiary sense, to the issue in the case, it must be at least germane, that is, there must be at least some possibility of the answer leading to the discovery of relevant evidence. In the present case I can find nothing which indicates that the answers to these interrogatories will have even the remotest bearing upon the issue raised by the defendant's second defense. The defense is simply that the claims of the patent “disclose no invention and the same are invalid”. Interrogatories of a similar nature were sustained in General Motors Corporation v. California Research Corporation, D.C., 9 F.R.D. 568. In that case the pleadings raised the issues: (1) that the patentees were not the first inventors in that the subject matter was patented and described in this and foreign countries more than two years prior to the application, and (2) that the subject matter of the patents was in public use more than two years, etc. The relevancy and propriety of the interrogatories *in*such a case are, of course, at once apparent.

In the present case I can see no possible relationship between the dates asked for, namely, invention, first disclosure and first drawing, and the issue raised that the claims disclosed no invention.
97-343.

#### State ex rel. Simpson v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 96APD04-463. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due April 21,1997, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua, sponte.*
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

 

The undersigned, Jeffrey J. Steiner, Chief Executive Officer of The Fairchild Corporation ("Company"), hereby certifies that (1) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the Annual Period Ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ JEFFREY J. STEINER
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3162 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3162

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To clarify the health care provided by the Secretary of Veterans 
          Affairs that constitutes minimum essential coverage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDED BY THE SECRETARY OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS THAT CONSTITUTES MINIMUM ESSENTIAL 
              COVERAGE.

    (a) In General.--Clause (v) of section 5000A(f)(1)(A) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as added by section 1501(b) of the 
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, is amended to read as 
follows:
                            ``(v) chapter 17 or 18 of title 38, United 
                        States Code, or otherwise under the laws 
                        administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
                        Affairs, of an individual entitled to coverage 
                        under such chapter or laws for essential health 
                        benefits (as defined by the Secretary for 
                        purposes of section 1302(b) of the Patient 
                        Protection and Affordable Care Act) insofar as 
                        such benefits are available under such chapter 
                        or laws; or''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in section 1501(b) of the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act and shall be executed immediately after the 
amendments made by such section 1501(b).

            Passed the Senate March 26 (legislative day, March 25), 
      2010.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3162

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To clarify the health care provided by the Secretary of Veterans 
          Affairs that constitutes minimum essential coverage.
```
Exhibit 24

 

February 26, 2008

 

TO:		    Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.          Paul A. Castanon

Re:      		Power of Attorney - 2007 Form 10-K

 

Entergy Corporation, referred to herein as the Company, will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Company and the undersigned persons, in their respective capacities as directors and/or officers of the Company, as specified in Attachment I, do each hereby make, constitute and appoint Theodore H. Bunting, Jr and Paul A. Castanon and each of them, their true and lawful Attorneys (with full power of substitution) for each of the undersigned and in his or her name, place and stead to sign and cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the aforementioned Annual Report on Form 10-K and any amendments thereto.

Yours very truly,

ENTERGY CORPORATION

 

 

By: /s/ J. Wayne LeonardJ. Wayne LeonardChairman of the Board, Directorand Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 4.1


ImmuCell Corporation


 


AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT is entered
into as of August 10, 2022, between IMMUCELL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and American Stock Transfer
& Trust Co., a New York corporation, as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agent”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company and
the Rights Agent are parties to (i) a Rights Agreement dated as of September 5, 1995, providing for the issuance of certain common stock
purchase rights (the “Rights”) to holders of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, (ii) an Amendment to the Rights
Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005, (iii) a second Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2008, (iv) a third Amendment
to the Rights Agreement dated as of August 9, 2011 (v) a fourth Amendment to the Rights Agreement dated as of June 16, 2014, (vi) a fifth
Amendment to the Rights Agreement dated as of April 15, 2015 and (vii) a sixth Amendment to the Rights Agreement dated as of August 10,
2017 (collectively, the “Rights Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, under Section 7(a)
of the Rights Agreement, the Rights terminate on or before the Final Expiration Date, defined in Section 1(a) of the Rights Agreement
to be September 19, 2022; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company’s
Board of Directors has determined that extending the Final Expiration Date for the Rights is in the best interest of the Company;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
benefits arising herefrom, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


		1.	FINAL EXPIRATION DATE. Section 1(i) of the Rights Agreement
is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:



 


			“(i) “Final Expiration Date” shall mean
the Close of Business on September 19, 2023.”



 


		2.	OTHER PROVISIONS. The “Summary of Rights to Purchase
Common Stock” (attached to the Rights Agreement as Exhibit B thereto) shall likewise be deemed amended to reflect the change under
Section 1 above. In all other respects, the terms and provisions of the Rights Agreement are hereby confirmed and shall remain in full
force and effect, subject to the changes stated herein.



 


Signature page to follow


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused
this Amendment to be duly executed and attested, all as of the date first above written.


 


		Attest:	IMMUCELL CORPORATION



 


	By:	/s/ Elizabeth
    S. Toothaker	 	By:	/s/ Michael
    F Brigham
	 	
    Elizabeth S. Toothaker

    Director of Finance and Administration
	 	 	
    Michael F. Brigham

    President and Chief Executive Officer




 


		Attest:	AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC



 


	By:	/s/ Joseph Dooley	 	By:	/s/ Michael Legregin
	 	Name: 	Joseph Dooley	 	 	Name: 	Michael Legregin
	 	Title:	Senior Vice President	 	 	Title:	Senior Vice President, Corporate Actions Relationship Management & Operations



 


Signature Page to Amendment to Rights Agreement
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000009342
<NAME> BALDOR ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996             DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996             DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                            7950                    6322
<SECURITIES>                                     17892                   28487
<RECEIVABLES>                                    83383                   80568
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3200                    2800
<INVENTORY>                                      92387                   83689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                218157                  212095
<PP&E>                                          202470                  182214
<DEPRECIATION>                                  107106                   93143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  325486                  313462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            71182                   67026
<BONDS>                                          45027                   25255
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                          2862                    2817
<OTHER-SE>                                      197463                  208561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    325486                  313462
<SALES>                                         502875                  473103
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                505372                  475699
<CGS>                                           353345                  334306
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   448180                  422753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   695                     886
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2668                    1260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  57192                   52946
<INCOME-TAX>                                     22019                   20641
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              35173                   32305
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     35173                   32305
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00                    0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.97                    0.84 
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3082 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3082

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize individuals who are 
pursuing programs of rehabilitation, education, or training under laws 
administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to receive work-study 
allowances for certain outreach services provided through congressional 
                    offices, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 5, 2010

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize individuals who are 
pursuing programs of rehabilitation, education, or training under laws 
administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to receive work-study 
allowances for certain outreach services provided through congressional 
                    offices, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF WORK-STUDY ALLOWANCE TO INCLUDE CERTAIN 
              OUTREACH SERVICES CONDUCTED THROUGH CONGRESSIONAL 
              OFFICES.

    Section 3485(a)(4) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(G) The following activities carried out at the offices 
        of Members of Congress for such Members:
                    ``(i) The distribution of information to members of 
                the Armed Forces, veterans, and their dependents about 
                the benefits and services under laws administered by 
                the Secretary and other appropriate governmental and 
                non-governmental programs.
                    ``(ii) The preparation and processing of papers and 
                other documents, including documents to assist in the 
                preparation and presentation of claims for benefits 
                under laws administered by the Secretary.''.
                                 <all>
```
[980 NE2d 532, 956 NYS2d 483]

#### In the Matter of Weeks Woodlands Association, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Dormitory Authority of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

Decided November 29, 2012

*920APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Albert K. Butzel Law Offices,*New York City *(Albert K. Butzel*and *Michael S. Gruen*of counsel), for appellants.

*Wachtel Masyr & Missry LLP,*New York City *(Karen Binder*of counsel), for Dormitory Authority of the State of New York and another, respondents.

*Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel,*New York City *(Edward F.X. Hart*of counsel), for New York City Department of Buildings, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. Under the particular circumstances of this case, we agree with the Appellate Division majority that the challenged project is substantially complete and that the proper course of action was to dismiss the appeals taken to that Court as moot.

*921Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott.