alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
97-106.

#### State ex rel. Magyar v. McQuade.

Erie App. No. E-96-045. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Erie County. On March 4, 1997, appellants tendered for filing a motion to supplement the record but did not tender the number of copies required by S.Ct.Prac.R. VII(5)(A)(9). Accordingly.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that appellants’ motion to supplement the record be, and hereby is, stricken, effective March 5,1997.
. - , . . ; , . * - , i 4~? .,:.-;?.FLt r-7, rc:;i-lr::q:c I: - 'k::r==!r 

. . <1,::iyc,7 :,: :r,,s.l (-1:. , = .- s-.fi:r.ia:,. -";?? ILZ:~~. i'~~:.-,f-~3! 'rC:llr. f;:r!.:i*::+ <> . * --,:T*?:T,:,.-,~ '\':!;?:; -.-,, %-~*,m.. p---=,*' .c. -.-,. ,.. - . , y~, :,~~*,+c~~~ py5:7-:-::,i+ 9- r:yr :.::;; ?:- 

?n>va-.- - ->, .',:* \.-f:f- +.' .,: -,=,, . <> ,: , , *, ;,+ -, -. . 2 .; < - ,-: ,- . .- .: , -. . - . . ., , .- , -. . . .... . .!T c7' : = I:.:..,. . :.; .. + - . 2 - - .,. - ,. 

>-.- 

-. <,*,h * . ,, 

i . *7-, . ,I... *--. '-, .. ,-... .t-+ .-.. P5,2!+- ?? ,>--: -5 . ':-:\ \2-hb,T F r,x! t-p c.>Arcl- : l!hp-; --,-t~-~! -. -..' ...... .,. 

. . v, .,'.-*--- - -,,.- .-,. ---.\ - 7v:. ? >. !i.', -;*; -?.? ,-r,, z.-7p.-; .+T.f r:.rc .: ~?<=,., -- .. . .. , 11. .. .. . .. . 
t -. 4 - ' '-,A.;:Q. -:,+F..:- L ? Tly-:i 3- ,i ~i:~-~_:t~r..\ , -r': 1J5 -: r - . , 1. .. . 7.- . .* ... . * , , . . - - - .,,.. -* ,'P' :; ' ;I-, . -A. 

, .... - ._.. . . . . -: ..-. cr3 %.',. , -, ,.+% ,> .:.. Lin >:*,*. ;<, h,, ,: -..,- .-A,~ .-.- \:~.: .,->; , -: r,., e, : ,;>, I.. - . J -' - - - . . . . . . . . - .. . .,. .. ..< -.-, ,.. -, -;- . .- . .. .
Order entered October 31, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00975-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

JOHN FLANAGAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-23858-V

ORDER

The clerk’s record is overdue in this State’s appeal. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS

the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of 

this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
----

----

| 1.   | The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 | Atlas Mining Company |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                 |                 |   |
| Date:   September 30, 2009 | By:                  | /s/ ANDRE ZEITOUN |
|                                 |                 | Andre Zeitoun |
|                                 |                 | Chief Executive Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3028 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3028

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 190-
day lifetime limit on inpatient psychiatric hospital services under the 
                           Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 2010

 Mr. Kerry (for himself and Ms. Snowe) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 190-
day lifetime limit on inpatient psychiatric hospital services under the 
                           Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Mental Health Inpatient 
Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF 190-DAY LIFETIME LIMIT ON INPATIENT PSYCHIATRIC 
              HOSPITAL SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1812 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395d) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by adding ``or'' at the end;
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``; or'' at the 
                end and inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking paragraph (3); and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``(but shall not be 
        included'' and all that follows before the period at the end.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**Certifications Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, inconnection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Atlantic American Corporation (the“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Companycertifies, that, to such officer’s knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods expressed in the Report.     Date: March 29, 2007      /s/ Hilton H. Howell, Jr.      Hilton H. Howell, Jr.         President and Chief Executive Officer       Date: March 29, 2007      /s/ John G. Sample, Jr.      John G. Sample, Jr.         Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
Growth in Indian Gaming

Source: National Indian Gaming Commission

Revenues (in millions)
EXHIBIT 1

                   STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Arthur J.
Seidenfeld certify that:

1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
    2002 (the "Report") of Daine Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.

Date: October 21, 2002

                        /s/ Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                        ------------------------
                          Arthur J. Seidenfeld
                  President and Chief Executive Officer
August 11, 2014 

Via US. Mail and Email 

Mr. David Rapport 

Legal Counsel to the Susanville Indian Rancheria 

405 W. Perkins Street 

Ukaih, California 95482 

Re: Review of financing agreements on behalf of the Susanville Indian Rancheria 

Dear Mr. Rapport: 

This letter responds to the request on behalf of the Susanville Indian Rancheria 

("the Tribe") for the National Indian Gaming Commission's Office of General Counsel to 

review several loan agreements. Specifically, you asked for an opinion whether these 

agreements are management contracts requiring the NIGC Chair's approval under the 

Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. 

In my review, I considered the following documents (collectively "the Financing 

Agreements") submitted as attachments to e-mails sent on behalf of the Tribe: 

• Te1m Loan Agreement, marked as 10161A-Loan Agreement(9-8red).doc 

• Security Agreement, marked as 10161A·Security(4-3red).doc 

• Springing Depository Agreement, marked as 10161 A-SPRINGING(9-

8RED).doc, and 

• Promissory Note, marked as 10161A-NOTE(2014-5red).doc 

The Financing Agreements contain terms similar to other agreements the Office 

of General Counsel has already reviewed and analyzed. See 

www.nigc.gov/Reading_ Room/Management_ Review_ Lettcrs.aspx. Applying the same 

analysis here, it is my opinion that collectively the Financing Agreements are not 

management contracts and do not require the approval of the Chair. 

It is my understanding that the Financing Agreements are represented to be in 

substantially final form with respect to terms affecting this opinion, and if such tenns 

change in any material way prior to closing or are inconsistent with assumptions made 

herein, this opinion shall not apply. Further, this opinion is limited to the Financing 

Agreements listed above. This opinion does not include or extend to any other 

agreements or documents not submitted for review. 

NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 90 K SI. NE, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202.632.7003 fox: 202.632.7066 WWW.NIGC.GOV 

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Socromento, CA; Pho~mix, AZ; St. Povl, MN; Tul!o OK 
Mr. David Rapport 

Re: Review of financing agreements on behalf of the Susanville Indian Rancheria 

August 11, 2014 

Page 2 of2 

I anticipate that this letter will be posted to the NIGC1s website. Prior to posting, 

NIGC will notify you and give you an opportunity to identify and request that 

informati n subject to the exemptions under FOIA be redacted or withheld. A list of the 

FOIA exemptions may be found at 25 U.S.C. § 552(b). 

If you have any qLlestions, please contact NIGC Attorney Mary ModrichAlvarado at (202) 632-7003. 

Sincerely, 

o.4-M~ · eEric Shepard 

General Counsel (Acting) 

cc: Steven C. Huskey, Esq. 

Epport, Richman & Robbins, LLP 

(via e-mail: Shuskey@erlaw.com)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
            Financial Data Schedule for Specialty Retail Group, Inc.
                              First Quarter 10-QSB
            --------------------------------------------------------

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                            38,892
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  46,251
<PP&E>                                             3,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                       181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    49,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            599,090
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                        2,394
<COMMON>                                           9,325
<OTHER-SE>                                      (641,486)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      49,323
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 3,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (88,083)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (88,083)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (88,083)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.01)
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Raymond Negron, on Behalf of Paul White, Petitioner, v Suffolk County Sheriff et. al, Respondents.

[976 NYS2d 675]

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Suffolk County indictment Nos. 2710-2012 and 912A-2013, to release the defendant on his own recognizance or, in the alternative, fixing bail.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” *(People ex rel. Klein v Krueger,*25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; *see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson,*48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Skelos, J.E, Lott, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1142

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. David Anton Wesley, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 9, 2010 Filed: June 11, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. David Wesley appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after revoking his supervised release. Upon careful revie w, we conclude that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable. SeeUnited States v. Tyson , 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences are re viewed for unreasonableness in accordance with United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005)). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Bangor
Hydro-Electric Company-1998 Form 10K and is qualified in its entirety by
rreference to such 10K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000009548
<NAME> BANGOR HYDRO-ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      251,342
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     55,557
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          36,645
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       262,144
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 605,688
<COMMON>                                        36,817
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       59,054
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             22,993
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 118,864
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,604
<PREFERRED>                                      4,734
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           263,028
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       12,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   25,515
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        1,594
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 172,349
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  605,688
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      195,144
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             6,093
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     153,915
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     160,008
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         35,136
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,292
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  36,428
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        24,963
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,465
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,244
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   10,221
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       22,906
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          30,932
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.33
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7583

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ABDAL MALIEK SALAAM, a/k/a Gary McLaughlin,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CR-94-79, CR-94-80, CA-97-722-1)

Submitted: March 14, 2000 Decided: March 24, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abdal Maliek Salaam, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Even if Salaam’s notice of appeal was timely, he would not

be entitled to relief on appeal. The district court’s conclusion

that Salaam’s § 2255 motion could not be considered because it was

not filed within the one-year limitations period of the

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act is clearly correct.

2

PER CURIAM:

Abdal Maliek Salaam seeks to appeal the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing as

untimely Salaam’s 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999)

motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

Salaam’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.

In civil cases in which the United States is a party, a notice

of appeal must be filed no later than sixty days after entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order, see Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and

jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on July

16, 1999. Salaam’s notice of appeal was filed on November 9, 1999.

Because Salaam failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.*
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Elwood Shepard, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the ACompany@), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and   Date: May 11, 2007 By: /s/ Elwood Shepard Elwood Shepard Chief Executive Officer  Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LAURANCE KRIEGEL,

Appellant,

v.

SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC 

SERVICE COMPANY AND XCEL 

ENERGY,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00115-CV

Appeal from the

State Office of 

Administrative Hearings

(SOAH Docket No. 473-19-1644

PUC Docket No. 48973)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We 

further order Appellant pay all costs of this appeal, and this decision be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2019.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.