alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FY21 vs FY20/FY19 GGR Comparison

FY21 FY20 Inc / (Dec) % FY19 Inc / (Dec) %

Portland $ 4,440,688,687 $ 3,115,639,674 $ 1,325,049,013 42.5% 3,811,460,603 $ 629,228,084 16.5%

Sacramento 11,926,737,084 8,398,732,119 3,528,004,965 42.0% 9,680,299,513 $ 2,246,437,571 23.2%

Phoenix 3,217,759,740 2,358,077,411 859,682,329 36.5% 3,275,522,440 $ (57,762,700) -1.8%

St. Paul 4,787,386,386 3,730,300,247 1,057,086,139 28.3% 4,922,393,815 $ (135,007,429) -2.7%

Rapid City 372,306,820 238,635,440 133,671,380 56.0% 376,486,722 $ (4,179,902) -1.1%

Tulsa 3,155,036,484 2,104,460,609 1,050,575,875 49.9% 2,468,143,914 $ 686,892,570 27.8%

Oklahoma City 3,027,386,184 2,064,025,328 963,360,856 46.7% 2,669,838,721 $ 357,547,463 13.4%

Washington DC 8,098,283,597 5,822,544,712 2,275,738,885 39.1% 7,374,396,307 $ 723,887,290 9.8%

Total $ 39,025,584,982 $ 27,832,415,540 $ 11,193,169,442 40.2% 34,578,542,035 $ $ 4,447,042,947 12.9%

• FY21 GGR of $39B was $11.2B, or 40%, higher than FY20 GGR of $27.8B.

• FY21 GGR increased $4.4B, or 13%, from FY19 (pre-pandemic) GGR of $34.6B.

• 510 Audited Financial Statement submissions from 243 Tribes.
Exhibit 31(b)

CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC.        CERTIFICATION

I,
E. Follin Smith, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Constellation Energy Group, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(f) and 15d15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 3, 2006

|/s/E. FOLLIN SMITH                                                                 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
|    |                                                                                                                       |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                           |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AZZ incorporated. |

|                    |
|--------------------|
|                    |  |  |
| Date:  May 2, 2013 |   | /s/ Dana L. Perry |
|               |   | Dana L. Perry |
|               |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
#### RFR INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REX-HIDE INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Century Steps, Inc., Third Party Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 2005-1587, 2006-1284.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 13, 2006.

*ORDER*

Upon review of the file, it appears that RFR Industries, Inc.’s amended notice of appeal, related to the postjudgment orders entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas in district court case no. 3-02-CV-1444, should not have been docketed as a separate appeal, 2006-1284, but should have been treated as an amended notice of appeal filed in 2006-1587.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Appeal 2006-1284 is dismissed as improperly docketed.

(2) The revised official captions are reflected above.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 113 (Monday, June 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13906]



[[Page 28281]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,820]


Swanson Group/Swanson Aviation LLC, Grants Pass, OR; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 20, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed on behalf of workers at Swanson Group/Swanson Aviation LLC, 
Grants Pass, Oregon.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of May 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13906 Filed 6-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 3.1
 THIRD RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
ATS MEDICAL, INC.
  ARTICLE 1. NAME
  ARTICLE 2. REGISTERED OFFICE
  ARTICLE 3. AUTHORIZED SHARES
  ARTICLE 4. NO CUMULATIVE VOTING
  ARTICLE 5. NO PREEMPTIVE RIGHTS




---



##### 



ARTICLE 6. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
  Name
    
    AddressJohn R. Holroyd
    
    6905 Limerick Lane SouthEdina, Minnesota 55435John S. Salstrom
    
    1250 West Minnehaha ParkwayMinneapolis, Minnesota 55419Manuel A. Villafana
    
    P.O. Box 2122Loop StationMinneapolis, Minnesota 55402
 ARTICLE 7. WRITTEN ACTION BY DIRECTORS
  ARTICLE 8. DIRECTOR LIABILITY




---



##### 



ARTICLE 9. INDEMNIFICATION
#### Office of Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Vazquez.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Vazquez*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 295.]

*296(No. 96-2375

Submitted January 8, 1997

Decided April 23, 1997.)

*297
      *Geoffrey Stem,*Disciplinary Counsel, and *Sally Ann Steuk,*Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

*Per Curiam.*

The court adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the board on the conditions stated. It is therefore ordered that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for eighteen months and that six months of the suspension be stayed, with a period of probation for one year pursuant to the following conditions: (a) respondent must make restitution of $405 to Rivera; (b) within ninety days of this order respondent must provide Disciplinary Counsel with a report of findings, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis from his treating psychiatrist, and (c) at the end of nine months, respondent must obtain a current report from a psychiatrist or psychologist selected by Disciplinary Counsel and provide Disciplinary Counsel with the report. Costs are taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apogent Technologies Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
C. Leathe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                         /s/ Jeffrey C. Leathe
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Jeffrey C. Leathe
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         August 13, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Columbus Bar Association *v.*Jackson.

[Cite as *Columbus Bar Assn. v. Jackson*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 463.]

(No. 96-2782

Submitted February 19, 1997

Decided May 21, 1997.)

*465
      *Stanley D. Ross*and *Bruce A. Campbell,*for relator.

*Eric K. Jackson, pro se.*

*Per Curiam.*

We accept the findings and conclusions of the board. In a previous case involving failure to file an Ohio estate tax return, we imposed a public reprimand. *Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Stocker*(1989), 47 Ohio St.3d 46, 547 N.E.2d 1175. Here, because of his inexperience, respondent not only failed to file an estate tax return but also neglected a number of other probate matters. This is a case where mentoring is warranted. We therefore accept the board’s recommendation and suspend respondent from the practice of law for six months, but we stay the entire suspension subject to respondent’s being monitored for the duration of the suspension as determined by relator. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cook, J., dissents.

Cook, J.,

dissenting. Respondent’s course of conduct depicts a great deal more than inexperience. A lawyer new to the practice of law should not be excused for (1) issuing an insufficient-funds check to his client from his trust account, (2) twice ignoring requests from courts for status letters, (3) being cited five times for past-due probate filings, (4) twice failing to appear at citation hearings with resulting contempt of court charges, (5) ignoring the responsibility to file a tax return rather than seeking assistance, and (6) espousing a “didn’t get to it” reason for failure to fulfill the responsibility he accepted as a fiduciary. Diligence is not a “goal” to be reached through experience in the practice; it is a requirement from the first day. The public is entitled to be protected from lawyers who will not perform, in the manner of a competent professional, the work for which they were engaged. I would, therefore, suspend the respondent for one year.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         291,952
<SECURITIES>                                    51,130
<RECEIVABLES>                                  437,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                    53,282
<INVENTORY>                                     85,286
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               916,635
<PP&E>                                       5,626,262
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,040,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,113,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          862,113
<BONDS>                                      7,335,254
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,386,658
<PREFERRED>                                    290,545
<COMMON>                                           287
<OTHER-SE>                                     315,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,113,533
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,255,145
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  365,753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               583,108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             467,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,275,022)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (127,502)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,147,520)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (133,225)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,280,745)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.04)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Applied Minerals, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending  December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof,  I, Andre Zeitoun,  Chief  Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

















Applied Minerals, Inc.Date:  April 15, 2011
By:
/s/  ANDRE ZEITOUNAndre ZeitounChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael D. Dale, Chief Executive Officer of ATS Medical, Inc. (the "Company")
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September
30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 9, 2005


/s/ Michael D. Dale
-------------------------------------
Name: Michael D. Dale
Title: Chief Executive Officer
**CHECKLIST FOR MANAGEMENT CONTRACTS**

**ENTITY BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION**

**Tribe:**

**Management Contractor:**

**Class(es) of Gaming:**

**Reviewer:**

**Date Received:****Date of Review:**

Rev. 1/11/99
MAILING ADRESS: NIGC/DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop #1621 Washington, DC 20040 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax:

202.632.7066

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK; Oklahoma City, OK; Rapid City, SD

WWW.NIGC.GOV

January 12, 2024

Dear Tribal Leader:

We hope this letter finds you well. This correspondence is based on our records that indicate 

your Tribal casino(s) and/or the Tribal Gaming Regulatory Authority (TGRA) has issued a manual 

check payment to the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC). According to the U.S. Postal 

Service (USPS), there has been an increase in mail theft and stolen check fraud across the country 

this past year. The Commission has become aware of incidents involving check payments issued by 

Tribes, so we are reaching out to provide recommended increased security measures. 

The Commission encourages the use of the PAY.gov online payment system as a secure 

payment option that can be used for all payments to NIGC. Should the Tribe, its operation(s) and/or 

TGRA choose to continue issuing manual checks, NIGC recommends, at the minimum, using USPS 

confirmation services. Additionally recommended for all issued checks are the use of security 

envelopes without transparent windows, mailing checks only at attended mail receptacles, and 

conducting detailed account reconciliations to verify payment amounts.

As bad actors continue to seek new opportunities to take advantage of vulnerabilities, it has 

become more important to remain vigilant and flexible with our business practices and procedures to 

safeguard tribal assets. For questions regarding payments to NIGC, please contact us at

fee.questions@nigc.gov or by phone at 202-632-7003. 

Sincerely,

E. Sequoyah Simermeyer 

Chairman
Document

Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT TWENTY TO THE LOGISTICS SERVICES AGREEMENT


This AMENDMENT TWENTY TO THE LOGISTICS SERVICES AGREEMENT
(the “Amendment”), dated as of July 15, 2022, is by and between The Honest Company, Inc. (“CLIENT”) and GEODIS Logistics LLC (“GEODIS”). CLIENT and GEODIS are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”.


RECITALS:


A.The Parties entered into a Logistics Services Agreement dated January 31, 2014, as amended from time to time (collectively the “Agreement”);


B.Pursuant to Amendment Ten to the Agreement, dated November 2, 2018 (“Amendment Ten”), GEODIS currently provides warehousing, distribution and fulfillment services for CLIENT at the CLIENT-leased facility located at 5550 Donovan Way, North Las Vegas 89081 (the “Warehouse”);


C.Pursuant to Amendment 19 to the Agreement, dated May 17, 2022 (“Amendment 19”), the Parties extended the Initial Term set forth in Amendment Ten through August 1, 2022; and


D.The Parties desire to amend the Agreement for the purpose of extending the Initial Term set forth in Amendment 19 through September 2, 2022, as set forth herein.


NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement with respect to the Warehouse as follows:


1.Extension. The Initial Term of the Agreement, as set forth in Amendment Nineteen, is hereby extended from March 31, 2022, through Friday, September 2, 2022.


2.Conflict. To the extent there is any conflict between the Agreement and this Amendment with respect to the Services hereunder, the terms of this Amendment and any exhibits hereto will supersede such conflicting terms of the Agreement.


3.Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment or any of the exhibits attached hereto will have the meanings given to them in the Agreement unless otherwise defined.


4.No Other Changes. Except as provided herein, the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.








[Signature Page to Follow]


			
	Page 1 of 2






Exhibit 10.2



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.


									
	THE HONEST COMPANY, INC.
		GEODIS LOGISTICS LLC

	By: /s/ Kelly Kennedy
		By: /s/ Anthony Jordan

	Name: Kelly Kennedy		Name: Anthony Jordan
	Title: Chief Financial Officer		Title: EVP, COO
	Date: 7/15/2022		Date: 7/15/2022






			
	Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (09-054)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

# SUMMARY:

Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

# DATES:

June 16, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda B. Blackburn, Patent Counsel, Langley Research Center, Mail Code 141, Hampton, VA 23681-2199; telephone (757) 864-3221; fax (757) 864-9190.

*NASA Case No. LAR-17384-1:*                         Advanced Modified High Performance Synthetic Jet Actuator with Curved Chamber;                    

*NASA Case No. LAR-17390-1:*                         Advanced High Performance Horizontal Piezoelectric Hybrid Synthetic Jet Actuator;                    

*NASA Case No. LAR-17416-1:*                         Integrated Universal Chemical Detector with Selective Diffraction Array;                    

*NASA Case No. LAR-17112-2:*                         Multilayer Electroactive Polymer Composite Material;                    

*NASA Case No. LAR-17547-1:*                         Multiple-Wavelength Tunable Laser;                    

*NASA Case No. LAR-17154-2:*                         Sol-Gel Based Oxidation Catalyst and Coating System Using Same;                    

*NASA Case No. LAR-17736-1:*                         Controlled Deposition and Alignment of Carbon Nanotubes;                              ( print page 28574)    

*NASA Case No. LAR-17629-1:*                         Method and Apparatus for Shape and End Position Determination Using an Optical Fiber;                    

*NASA Case No. LAR-17382-1:*                         Advanced High Performance Vertical Hybrid Synthetic Jet Actuator;                    

*NASA Case No. LAR-17759-1:*                         Multilayer Electroactive Polymer Composite Material.                    

Dated: June 10, 2009.

Richard W. Sherman,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. E9-14052 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P