alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the ACompany@) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Elwood Shepard, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: August 12 2005

By: /s/ Elwood Shepard

Elwood Shepard

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jean Cantave, Appellant.

Submitted July 23, 2012;

decided August 28, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
FY21 GGR by Revenue Range

8% submissions 

reported revenues 

>$250M = 52% of 

total GGR

55% submissions 

reported revenues 

<$25M = 6% of 

total GGR

% OF OPERATIONS

<$25M, 55%

$25M to $50M, 13%

$50M to $100M, 11%

$100M to $250M, 12%

$250M+, 8%

% OF REVENUE

<$25M, 6%

$25M to $50M, 6%

$50M to $100M, 10%

$100M to $250M, 26%

$250M+, 52%
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of EnerJex Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd R. Bart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Todd Bart                                   			

Todd R. Bart |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | June 12, 2007 |
|--------|---------------|
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edwin King, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 474]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), imposed October 30, 2003, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Miller, J.E, Crane, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         43
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,893
<PP&E>                                           2,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,293
<BONDS>                                          1,811
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         40
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,047
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,388
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    119
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (34)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                153
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       153
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR NOTES
THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3367 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the rate of pension 

for disabled veterans who are married to one another and both of whom 

require regular aid and attendance, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2010 

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

rate of pension for disabled veterans who are married 

to one another and both of whom require regular aid 

and attendance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3367 IS

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN RATE OF PENSION FOR DISABLED 

2 VETERANS MARRIED TO ONE ANOTHER AND 

3 BOTH OF WHOM REQUIRE REGULAR AID AND 

4 ATTENDANCE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1521(f)(2) of title 38, 

6 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘$8,911’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘$31,305’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact10 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 824098
<NAME> SCOTTSDALE LAND TRUST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       8,992,569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,897,413
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,578,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,075,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,578,115
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,005,011
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,458,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,381,945
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,381,945
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,381,945
<EPS-BASIC>                                      67.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,862]

      ( print page 27354)    
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 28, 2009, in response to a petition filed by the IUE-CWA Region Seven union on behalf of workers of BU Professional Luminaries NA, Burlington, Massachusetts.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of May, 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13469 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jermaine Donnell KORNEGAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-7112.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 23, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 3, 2006.

Jermaine Donnell Kornegay, Appellant Pro Se. Ethan Ainsworth Ontjes, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Donnell Kornegay seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substan*199tial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kornegay has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Elwood Shepard, certify that: 1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  July 23, 2008  /s/ Elwood Shepard Elwood Shepard President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>   1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Associates First Capital Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-09215,
333-12141, 333-12143, 333-12145, 333-12147, 333-12149, 333-12151, 333-12153,
333-19417, 333-22367, 333-22369, 333-24727, and 333-42001) of our report dated
January 20, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
Associates First Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997
and 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                            COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
Dallas, Texas
February 17, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Entergy
Corporation financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000065984
<NAME> ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER> 023
   <NAME> ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   15,500,756
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  1,778,119
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       3,219,132
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,487,080
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,985,087
<COMMON>                                         2,471
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    4,636,163
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          2,786,467
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               7,425,101
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          284,650
<PREFERRED>                                    488,455
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         6,612,583
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             120,715
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  194,555
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    205,464
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               178,247
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               7,475,317
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               22,985,087
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    8,773,228
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           356,667
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   7,521,574
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   7,521,574
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      1,251,654
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             255,640
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               1,507,294
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       555,601
<NET-INCOME>                                   595,026
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     42,567
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  552,459
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       291,483
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      601,739
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       1,307,369
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $2.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $2.25



</TABLE>
#### The State ex rel. Williams, Appellant, *v.*Brigano, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Williams v. Brigano*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 413.]

(No. 96-2752

Submitted March 18, 1997

Decided May 14, 1997.)

*414
      *Donald L. Williams, Sr., pro se.*

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Donald Gary Keyser,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee, Anthony Brigano, Warden.

*Per Curiam.*

Williams asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. Williams’s assertion lacks merit for the following reasons.

First, a claimed denial of the right to a speedy trial is not cognizable in habeas corpus. *State ex rel. Dotson v. Rogers*(1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 25, 607 N.E.2d 453. Instead, appeal is the appropriate remedy to raise this claim. *Russell v. Tate*(1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 444, 444-445, 596 N.E.2d 1039, 1040.

Second, the speedy trial issue has been previously adjudicated on direct appeal, and *res judicata*bars Williams from relitigating the issue in a habeas corpus action. *Id.,*64 Ohio St.3d at 445, 596 N.E.2d at 1040.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          141831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                141831
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  253503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6282
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      247221
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    253503
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1226
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (11527)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11527)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not presented, as all shares of common stock are held by a sole
shareholder.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. —, original.

#### Ex parte John A. Kennedy.

January 19, 1942.

The motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.
97-417.

#### State v. Nolen.

Franklin App. No. 95APA05-569. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
Please use this button to print

& submit via fax to

(202) 632-0045

National Indian Gaming Commission

St. Paul Region

Attendee Information

Name (First & Last) Position/Title

Business Street address City/State/Zip

Business E-mail address

**All fields are required**

NOTE: Please use a separate form for each attendee

Business contact phone number

*include area code - numbers only please

Entity registrant represents

Tribe Information

Ext.

If you do not represent a Tribe/Tribal Casino/Tribal Gaming

Commission entity, please enter agency name above.

Please use this button to submit

via E-mail (Outlook or Internet

based e-mail)

or

For further information or questions, please contact:

Tribe Name

Regulatory Review Consultation

Mystic Lake Casino & Resort

 May 16, 2011

Rita Homa

Executive Assistant

1441 L Street, N.W. Suite 9100

Washington, DC 20005

Phone: (202) 418-9807

Consultation Registration Form