alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 5,2004 

Kenneth E. Chambers, Principal Chief 

Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 

P.O. Box 1498 

Wewoka, OK 74884 

Re: Reopening of Gaming Facilities by the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 

Dear Chief Chambers: 

The National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) issued an Order on December 

12, 2003, allowing the Seminole Nation to reopen its gaming facilities subject to the 

terms and conditions of a "Pre-opening Agreement" incorporated into the Order. The 

Nation had previously accepted the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement. The 

gaming facilities were closed by the Nation on June 14, 2003, following the NIGC's 

Notice of Decision and Order of May 7, 2002, making permanent Orders of Temporary 

Closure issued by the NIGC Chairman. 

The Nation, acting through the Seminole Nation Gaming Commission, the 

Seminole Nation Development Authority, and the Nation's General Council, has now 

satisfactorily complied with the terms and conditions in the "Pre-opening Agreement" for 

the reopening of the 1-40 Travel Plaza gaming facility, since renamed the Mystic Winds 

Casino. Accordingly, the Nation is authorized to re-open the facility subject to the 

further terms and conditions in the Agreement that apply aAer re-opening. This reopening is to be on a probationary basis, as described in the "Pre-opening Agreement." 

This has been a difficult path for the Seminole Nation. I commend the Nation for 

accepting the challenge and working through the many issues that had to be addressed 

before re-opening the 1-40 Travel Plaza gaming facility. We look forward to the Nation 

enjoying the benefits of what we hope will be a successful and well-regulated gaming 

operation. /_-- 

; 

{ 

\ 

Chairman 

NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1441 L St NW, Su~te 9100. Washmgton DC 20005 Tel 202 632 7003 Fax 202 632 7066 www ~~cc.cov 

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland. OR. Sacramento. CA. Phoen~x AZ, St Paul. MN. Tulsa. OK
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

RONALD G. DANDAR,

Appellant

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 19 WAP 2016

Appeal from the Order of

Commonwealth Court entered March 30, 2016 at No. 222 MD 2016.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22 nd day of November, 2017

, the Order of the Commonwealth

Court is hereby AFFIRMED

.

The “Motion to Modify and Correct Illegal Sentence Nunc Pro Tunc” is DENIED

.
#### RHODES *v.*UNITED STATES.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

March 25, 1954.

Weiss & Weiss, New York City, for plaintiffs.

J. Edward Lumbard, U. S. Atty. Southern Dist. of N. Y., New York City, for defendant.

MURPHY, District Judge.

Absent a specific provision in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., the appropriate district court rule, in the case of actions on behalf of infants, merely directs that “the balance of the proceeds of the recovery * * * be distributed as [the court] deems may best protect the interest of the infant * * General Rules of United States District Courts for *the*Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, Rule 20, par. 3. The direction to “conform, as nearly as may be, to the practice in the New York state courts”, appearing in the same rule, id., par. 1; see also id., note, ought to be followed in the absence of circumstances indicating their lack of wisdom. A bond cannot be dispensed with in the exercise of discretion for a recovery of the amount in the instant case. New York Civil Practice Act, § 980-a. Recommendations made to the legislature which would make such bond unnecessary have not been adopted. See Eighteenth New York Judicial Council Report, 77-79 (1952); Nineteenth New York Judicial Council Report, 83-84 (1953). In passing, it should be noted that procedure without bond is possible by payment of the funds into court which are then turned over to the county treasurer, or the city treasurer in cases within the city of New York. Cf. New York Civil Practice Act, art. 14, § 133-137. The expense involved, cf. id., § 1561, and other obvious considerations, might well make such a procedure not feasible.

Accordingly, I again refrain from signing this order.
#### Jeana Barenboim et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v Starbucks Corporation, Respondent. Eugene Winans et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v Starbucks Corporation, Respondent.

Submitted April 29, 2013;

decided May 2, 2013

Motion by UNITE HERE! Local 100, Align: Alliance for a Greater New York et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on consideration of the certified questions herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and nine copies filed within seven days.
97-578.

#### State v. Furr.

Hamilton App. No. C-940326. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHAWN ALLEN BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1310 

[December 31, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Susan L. Alspector, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-006224CF10A.

Shawn Allen Brown, Moore Haven, pro se. 

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
U.S. Department of the Interior

Bureau of Land Management

BLM Fire

Understanding the News Media

Freedom of the press is protected by the First Amendment to ensure citizens have 

access to information not regulated by the government.

Most journalists consider themselves defenders of the “public’s right to know.”

Expect reporters to be especially interested in stories that offer intriguing angles 

(structures threatened, evacuations, fire costs, fire management, or anything that 

may affect the taxpayers).

Expect a reporter to probe for information, and to challenge assertions made by the 

agency verbally or in print.

Do not assume that probing or challenging questions indicate a bias or hostility on 

the part of the reporter. It may, but it may be more likely that the reporter is simply 

trying to understand the matter about which he/she is writing.

Do not assume the reporter knows everything you know about a situation, or that 

the reporter knows nothing. It’s ok to ask the reporter what their background 

knowledge is prior to beginning an interview.

Consider the difficulty of the task facing the journalist: compile a lot of information 

in a brief period of time in a manner readable to someone with a sixth grade 

education. To help the reporter write a well-informed story, do what you can to 

translate complex topics in a way that makes sense to the average person. 

EVERY reporter has a deadline. Don’t let their deadline determine the quality of 

information you provide to them. However, try to accommodate their deadline to 

the best of your ability, without compromising the message you are trying to convey.
Exhibit 23-1




To the Board of Directors
Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Armstrong, Iowa


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 33-53724 on Form S-8 related to the 401(k) Savings Plan and the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 related to the 1991 Employee Stock
Option Plan of Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. of our report,
dated January 9, 2004 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. for the year ended November 30, 2003.

                              /s/ McGladrey & Pullen LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
February 27, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27352-27353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,787]


Stand By Screw Machine, Incorporated, Berea, OH; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 13, 2009, in response to a 
petition filed on behalf of workers of Stand By Screw Machine, 
Incorporated, Berea, Ohio.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.


[[Page 27353]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of May, 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13452 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
1 NO. 04-15-00487-CV


### In the Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

________________________ ______________________ ____________________
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY et al.

v. LEON OSCAR RAMIREZ, JR. et al.

________________________ ______________________ ____________________
APPELLEES’ MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL

________________________ ______________________ ____________________
TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS:
Leon Oscar Ramirez, Jr. and Jesus M. Dominguez, as Guar dian for Minerva
Clementina Ramirez, an incapacitated person , Appellees and Cross-Appellants, file this
motion to reinstate the appeal and for cause show:

1. On November 11, 2015, ConocoPhillips Co mpany, defendant in the trial court
and one of the appellants, filed a notice of bankruptcy stating that on October
26, 2015, while this appeal was pendin g, Leon Oscar Ramirez, Jr., Appellee and
Cross-Appellant in this appeal, filed a petition in bankruptcy, in Case Number
15-50164, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
Texas, Laredo Division, styled In re Leon Oscar Ramirez, Jr.

2. On November 13, 2015, this Court ordere d the appeal abated and removed from
the court’s active docket pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. The Court also ordered ACCEPTED 04-15-00487-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 11/18/2015 6:15:15 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK2 that the appeal would be reinstated upon proper motion and proof. Tex. R. App.

P. 8.3.

3. On November 18, 2015, the Bankruptcy Court signed an order lifting the
automatic stay provided by 11 U.S.C. § 362, precisely so that this appeal may
continue to judgment. Attached hereto is a true and correct copy of the
Bankruptcy Court’s order lifting the automatic stay.

4. Therefore, Appellees and Cross-Appellant s request that the Court reinstate the
appeal on the Court’s active docket.
/s/ Alberto Alarcon Alberto Alarcon State Bar No. 00968425 H ALL , Q UINTANILLA & A LARCON , LC P.O. Box 207 1302 Washington Laredo, Texas 78042-0207 (956) 723-5527 (956) 723-8168 (fax) aalarcon@sbcglobal.net

Lisa Bowlin Hobbs State Bar No. 24026905 K UHN H OBBS PLLC 3307 Northland Drive, Suite 310 Austin, Texas 78731 (512) 476-6000 (512) 476-6002 (fax) lisa@kuhnhobbs.com3 C ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this motion was served on this 18 th day of November, 2015, to the following parties and counsel as designated:

Michael V. Powell Locke Lord LLP 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2200 Dallas, Texas 75201 via e-service

John A. Kazen 211 Calle del Norte, Suite 100 Laredo, Texas 78041-6237 via e-service

Bruce J. Werstak, III 6721 McPherson Road, Suite 360 Laredo, TX 78041 via e-service

Jesse R. Castillo via e-service Bank of America Plaza, Suite 1020 300 Convent St. San Antonio, Texas 78205
/s/ Alberto Alarcon Alberto Alarcon
#### In the Matter of Anna Scheffey-Hohle, Appellant, v Travis C. Durfee, Respondent.

Decided June 5, 2012

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent at the Appellate Division is not on a question of law (CPLR 5601 [a]).
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Lori Stevens

, * From the 118 th District Court

of Howard County,

Trial Court No. 52889

Vs. No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 397

- C V * December 30 , 20 2 1

Thomas Stevens

, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey

, C. J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by

reason of this appeal are taxed against Lori Stevens

.
97-355.

#### State v. Reed.

Hamilton App. No. C-950682. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Resnick, J., dissents.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Jack E. Davis, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Arizona Public ServiceCompany; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 

 

 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 15, 2004.     /s/ Jack E. Davis   Jack E. Davis
#### Albert G. Fraccola, Jr., et al., Appellants, v Phyllis Fraccola, Individually and as Sole Shareholder of Hydrania, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Decided May 8, 2012

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: January 26, 2017 522847 

________________________________

In the Matter of LUSHER 

WALLACE,

Petitioner,

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting

Commissioner of Corrections

and Community Supervision,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: November 29, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Aarons, JJ.

__________

Lusher Wallace, Coxsackie, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J.

Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of

violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to

challenge a tier III prison disciplinary determination. The

Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at

issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto

have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the

mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate

account. In light of this, and given that petitioner has been

afforded all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition

is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Kirshtein v New York State
-2- 522847 

Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 142 AD3d 1246, 1246

[2016]; Matter of Boyd v Annucci, 142 AD3d 1214, 1214 [2016]). 

Although petitioner has also requested to be restored to the

status that he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination,

he is not entitled to such relief (see Matter of Ramierz v

Annucci, 142 AD3d 1198, 1198 [2016]; Matter of Guiffre v Annucci,

142 AD3d 1193, 1193 [2016]). He is, however, entitled to the

restoration of any good time lost as a result of the

determination (see Matter of Ramierz v Annucci, 142 AD3d at 1198;

Matter of Guiffre v Annucci, 142 AD3d at 1193).

Peters, P.J., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without

costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3147 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3147

       To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 22 (legislative day, March 19), 2010

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patient Choice Restoration Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and the amendments 
made by that Act, are repealed.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership VI-B for
the quarter ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                           824,015
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     97,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       0
<PP&E>                                                         7,078,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 2,155,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 6,466,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            273,101
<BONDS>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   6,466,077
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 493,838
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    420,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               114,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (33,749)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (33,749)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23
          Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors
Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Armstrong, Iowa

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 33-53724 on Form S-8 related to the 401(k) Savings Plan and the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 related to the 1991 Employee Stock
Option Plan of Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. of our report, dated
January 7, 2006 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Art's-Way Manufacturing Co., Inc. for the year ended November 30, 2005.

                                            /s/ McGladrey & Pullen LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
February 28, 2006
#### In the Matter of Joel R. Brandes, a Disbarred Attorney.

Decided April 25, 2013

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Judiciary Law § 90 (8) does not provide an independent predicate for an appeal as of right to the Court of Appeals.