alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                        JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                     29,416
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           42,059
<PP&E>                                      2,892
<DEPRECIATION>                                361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             74,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     724,895
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                 2,394
<COMMON>                                    9,325
<OTHER-SE>                               (742,247)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               74,367
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          9,429
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (188,844)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                           (188,844)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                             (188,844)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.02)
        

</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3329 

To provide triple credits for renewable energy on brownfields, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2010 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and Mr. BROWN of Ohio) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide triple credits for renewable energy on brownfields, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cleanfields Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. TRIPLE CREDITS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY ON 

6 BROWNFIELDS. 

7 Section 610 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies 

8 Act of 1978 (as added by section 132 of the American 

9 Clean Energy and Leadership Act of 2009) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)— 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3329 IS

1 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (4) 

2 through (12) as paragraphs (5) through (13), 

3 respectively; and 

4 (B) by inserting after paragraph (3) the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(4) BROWNFIELD SITE GENERATION FACIL7 ITY.—The term ‘brownfield site generation facility’ 

8 means a facility that— 

9 ‘‘(A) generates renewable electricity from 

10 wind energy, solar energy, or geothermal en11 ergy; and 

12 ‘‘(B) occupies a brownfield site (as defined 

13 in section 101 of the Comprehensive Environ14 mental Response, Compensation, and Liability 

15 Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601)).’’; 

16 (2) in subsection (c)— 

17 (A) in paragraph (2)— 

18 (i) in subparagraph (H), by striking 

19 ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon at the end; 

20 (ii) in subparagraph (I)(iv), by strik21 ing the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; 

22 and’’; and 

23 (iii) by adding at the end the fol24 lowing: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3329 IS

1 ‘‘(J) allow triple credits for generation of 

2 energy from brownfield site generation facili3 ties.’’; and 

4 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(6) BROWNFIELDS CAP.—Subject to a revision 

6 under subsection (l)(2)(D), not more than 1 percent 

7 of total renewable electricity generation described in 

8 this section may be eligible for consideration for the 

9 triple credit multiplier for brownfields in paragraph 

10 (2)(J).’’; and 

11 (3) in subsection (l)(2)— 

12 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘; 

13 and’’ and inserting a semicolon; 

14 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the 

15 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

16 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(D) the amount of renewable energy gen18 eration permitted on brownfields sites described 

19 in subsection (c)(6) should be revised.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THOMAS PAUL WEST; GREGORY 

DICKENS; CHARLES M. HEDLUND;

ROBERT W. MURRAY; THEODORE

WASHINGTON; TODD SMITH,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 11-16707

v. D.C. No.

2:11-cv-01409- JANICE K BREWER, Governor of  NVW Arizona; CHARLES L. RYAN,

District of Arizona, Director, Arizona Department of Phoenix Corrections; ERNEST TRUJILLO;

CARSON MCWILLIAMS, Warden, ORDER

Arizona Department of

Corrections- Florence; UNKNOWN

PARTIES, named as Does 1-50,

Defendants-Appellees. 

Filed July 18, 2011

Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and

Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Thomas Paul West’s petition for panel rehearing

is DENIED.

9449
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3200 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

23 Genesee Street in Hornell, New York, as the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2010 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, New York, 

as the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ZACHARY SMITH POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, 

6 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Zachary 

7 Smith Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, or other record of the United States 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3200 IS

1 to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 

2 to be a reference to the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post Office Build3 ing’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
NAL |
4° No,

V4

RP)

Y
é
>
Ne comm”
Wanda Stone, Chairperson and CEO
Kaw Nation AUG 2 1 2002

Drawer 50
Kaw City, OK 74641

Subject: Amendment to Tribal Gaming Ordinance
Dear Chairperson Stone:

This letter responds to your request received by the National Indian Gaming Commission
(NIGC) on June 3, 2002, for review of the amendment to the Kaw Nation’s tribal gaming
ordinance that was adopted by majority vote of the Kaw Nation Executive Council on
April 13, 2002. On December 27, 1993, the Chairman of the NIGC approved the original
ordinance. This amendment does not require approval by the NIGC because it addresses
issues not raised in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) or the NIGC regulations.

Under the IGRA and the NIGC regulations, the Chairman is directed to review ordinances and
amendments with respect to the requirements of the IGRA and the implementing regulations.
Thus, the scope of the Chairman’s review and approval is limited to the requirements
contained therein. Provisions other than those required under the IGRA or the NIGC
regulations that may be included in a tribal ordinance are not subject to review and approval.

However, the most recent amendment further loosens the restriction contained in the original
gaming ordinance on employment in the Kaw Nation’s gaming enterprise of elected tribal
officials and their families. The restriction on employment of family members was eliminated
by the Kaw Nation in 1996 and reviewed by the Chairperson of the NIGC on February 5,
1997. The most recent amendment permits all elected tribal officers, including members of
the Executive Council, to be employed by the gaming operation. The potential for conflict
and self-serving transactions in this situation is high. Therefore, it is recommended that the
Kaw Nation address these concerns by generating procedures to assure that the Executive
Council can effectively regulate its members who also are employees of the gaming operation.

Thank you for submitting the amendment to the tribal gaming ordinance of the Kaw Nation
for review and approval. The NIGC staff and I look forward to working with you and the
Kaw Nation in implementing the IGRA.

Sincerely yours,

Montie R. Deer
Chairman

NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1441 L St. NW, Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 WWW.NIGC.Gov

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK
96-922.

#### Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Keeler.

IT IS ORDERED by this court, *sua sponte,*effective May 7, 1997, that Robert C. Keeler, a.k.a. Robert Campbell Keeler, Attorney Registration No. 0029017, last known address in Westlake, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of August 28, 1996, to wit: failure to surrender his Certificate of Admission and failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before September 27, 1996.
#### Sabrina Oliveri, Respondent, v Vassar Brothers Hospital, Appellant.

Submitted October 29, 2012;

decided December 13, 2012

*966Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### UNITED STATES of America v. 7,534.04 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN BARTOW AND CHEROKEE COUNTIES, State of GEORGIA; C. P. Kennedy, et al.

Civ. A. No. 575.

United States District Court N. D. Georgia, Rome Division.

Oct. 18, 1954.

Slaton Clemmons, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff.

Jack Rogers, of Wright, Rogers, Magruder & Hoyt, Rome, Ga., for defendant.

HOOPER, Chief Judge.

Defendant property owners on June 21, 1954 filed interrogatories in said case to which the Government on July 15, 1954 filed a motion for protective order.

No objection is made to Interrogatories Nos. 1 and 2.

The remaining interrogatories in effect seek to obtain information as to the name of the Government’s appraisers, copies of their appraisals, method of appraisals, a breakdown of values, etc.

 In a case such as this, the burden of proof is upon the property owner to prove the value of the land in question. Value of land is primarily a matter of opinion, which no doubt the Government, as well as the property owners, will prove to a large extent by expert witnesses. The land is open to inspection by all parties, no information concerning the same is sought from the Government that is not readily available to the defendants. The information sought therefore, is necessarily information obtained by the Government in preparation of the trial of the case and in the opinion of this court is not obtainable by interrogatories. See Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport Corporation, D.C., 32 F.Supp. 21; General Motors Corp. v. California Research Corp., D.C., 8 F.R.D. 568(3).

Objections to interrogatories are therefore sustained as made.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                   EXHIBIT 23
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 33-50547 and 33-55953) of Avco Financial Services, Inc. and in
the related Prospectuses of our report dated January 25, 1996, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Avco Financial Services,
Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1995.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Orange County, California
March 27, 1996
 
                                       S-4
astra_ex102.htm

  
 EXHIBIT 10.2
  
 ADDENDUM TO COMMON STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
  
 Dated August 4, 2022
  
 WHEREFORE, on or about August 4, 2022, Astra Energy Inc. and Albert Mardikian entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement whereby Astra Energy Inc. purchased all of Albert Mardikian’s shares (66,230,268) and all interest in Regreen Technologies Inc. in exchange for 10,000,000 Common Shares of Astra Energy Inc. and $250,000.00 in cash pursuant to milestones delineated in Exhibit A of the Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 4, 2022.
  
 WHEREFORE, Section 1(l) of the Agreement indicates that “Buyer assumes agrees to pay Seller $3,000,000.00 for the sale of a 15 TPH machine once revenues from the sale have been received. All relevant patents and this technology have been transferred by Seller to the Company and shall remain the property of the Company”.
  
 It is acknowledged and agreed by Astra Energy Inc. and Albert Mardikian that Buyer shall pay Seller $3,000,000.00 from the proceeds of the sale of a 15 TPH machine if the sale price of the machine is greater than $12,500,000.00. In the event the sale price of the machine is less than $12,500,000, than Seller shall receive 8% of the total purchase price of the 15 TPH machine sold, and any additional 15 TPH machines sold, until Seller has received a total of $3,000,000.00.
  
 	 /s/ Albert Mardikian
	  
	  

	 Albert Mardikian, Seller date: 08/05/22
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  

	 /s/ Kermit Harris 
	  
	  

	 Kermit Harris, President, Astra Energy Inc. date: 08/05/22
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004








In connection with the Quarterly Report of All Grade Mining, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary Kouletas, President of the Company, respectfully certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that:





That as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, I conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012. In making this evaluation, I used the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, I concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 30, 2012.





The Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Gary Kouletas


Gary Kouletas


President (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)








Date: 7 June 2013





This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to All Grade Mining, Inc. and will be retained by All Grade Mining, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





---
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

97-133.

#### Grooms v. Herring.

Stark App. No. 1996CA00318. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due February 14, 1997, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua sponte.*
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

(PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

 

(Subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code)

 

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of Apogee Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”) of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 14,  2008 | /s/    | Herbert M. Stein                            |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                           |   | Herbert M. Stein                            |
|                           |   | Chairman of the Board,                      |
|                           |   | President, Chief Executive  Officer         |
|                           |   | (principal executive  officer)              |
|                           |   |                                        |
|                           |   |                                        |
| Dated: November 14,  2008 | /s/    | Paul J. Murphy                              |
|                           |   | Paul J. Murphy                              |
|                           |   | Chief Financial Officer  and Vice President |
|                           |   | Finance (principal  financial officer and   |
|                           |   | principal accounting  officer)              |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,859]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 28, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at T. Rad North America, Inc., Hopkinsville, Kentucky.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of May 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13913 Filed 6-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 21

                     BALDOR ELECTRIC COMPANY AND AFFILIATES
                          AFFILIATES OF THE REGISTRANT




NAME OF AFFILIATE
-----------------


Baldor of Arkansas                                        Arkansas

Baldor of Nevada, Inc.                                    Nevada

BEC Business Trust                                        Massachusetts

Baldor of Texas, L.P                                      Texas

Baldor International, Inc.                                U.S.Virgin Islands

Southwestern Die Casting, Inc.                            Arkansas

Baldor UK Holding Company, Inc.                           Delaware

Optimised LTD                                             United Kingdom

Optimized NZ                                              New Zealand

Baldor Holdings, Inc.                                     Delaware

Baldor de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                            Mexico

Baldor ASR, AG                                            Switzerland

Baldor ASR GmbH fuer Antriebstechnik                      Germany

Baldor ASR U.K. Limited                                   United Kingdom

Baldor Italia S.R.L.                                      Italy

Australian Baldor Pty. Limited                            Australia

Baldor Electric (Far East) PTE. Ltd.                      Singapore

Baldor Electric (Thailand) Ltd.                           Thailand

Baldor Industrial Automation PTE.Ltd.                     Singapore

Northern Magnetics, Inc.                                  California



<PAGE>