alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 11.01
                                           
                                           
                                           
                        OAK TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
            STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                        (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                     (UNAUDITED)
                                           
                                                                          
                            
                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                               September 30,
                                                             -----------------
                                                             1996         1995
                                                           --------      -------
Statement of operations data:
    Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(1,653)     $13,233
                                                           --------      -------
                                                           --------      -------

Weighted average number of common and
    dilutive common equivalent shares used
    in computations:
         Common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  40,297       37,588
         Stock options and other common stock equivalents .       -        5,094
                                                           --------      -------
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share (1). .  40,297       42,682
                                                           --------      -------
                                                           --------      -------
Net income (loss) per share (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (0.04)     $  0.31
                                                           --------      -------
                                                           --------      -------



(1)  Shares used in computing net income per share for prior periods have been
restated to reflect the impact of a two for one stock split approved by the 
Company's shareholders and effective as of March 28, 1996.



(2) The difference between the primary and fully diluted shares used in
computing net income per share is not material.
#### O’MALLEY et al. v. WYOMING NAT. BANK.

Civ. No. 4786.

United States District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania.

May 4, 1954.

*458Michael J. O’Malley, pro se.

Michael H. Sheridan, Wilkes-Barre, Pa., for defendant.

WATSON, Chief Judge.

In this action the defendant moved the Court to dismiss the action and in the alternative to require the plaintiffs to file a more definite statement.

The plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that during the period commencing December 1, 1948 and terminating December 15, 1949, plaintiffs in the course of business with the defendant bank made applications for loans in various amounts, which applications were approved and credit thereon given the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs further alleged that in applying credit to the plaintiffs on the applications, the defendant overcharged plaintiffs in the sum of $12,300 beyond the amount defendant was lawfully permitted to charge.

Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint averring that the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations. While such a motion is permitted under Rule 9(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., when the complaint shows that the statute has run,1 such motion is not proper here. The plaintiffs do not aver in their complaint when the alleged overcharges were made and, therefore, the complaint on its face does not show that the statute has run.

The motion to dismiss the action must be denied.

Defendant has moved in the alternative to require plaintiffs to file a more definite statement. A motion for a more definite statement may be made but only if the information sought is necessary to frame a responsive pleading and not for the purpose of preparing for trial. It is not a proper remedy unless the adversary’s pleading is so vague or ambiguous that a responsive pleading cannot reasonably be framed. Since an averment of time is material, the plaintiffs should have averred when the alleged overcharges were made. The complaint is vague and ambiguous in that respect and in other respects to such an extent that a responsive pleading cannot reasonably be framed.

For these reasons the motion for a more definite statement must be granted, and an appropriate order will be filed herewith.

1

. DiSabatino v. Mertz, D.C., 82 F.Supp. 248; Stofey v. U. S., D.C., 87 F.Supp. 81.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

National Security Agency, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The National Security Agency hereby gives notice of its intent to grant University of Maryland a revocable, non-assignable, exclusive license to practice the following Government-Owned invention as described in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 61/081,998 entitled: “Flexible, High Specific Energy Density, Rechargeable Battery,” filed with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office on July 18, 2008, and any related non-provisional patent application and all Letters Patent issuing thereon, and any continuation, continuation-in-part or division of said non-provisional patent application and any reissue or extension of said Letters Patent, in the field of thin film batteries. The above-mentioned invention is assigned to the United States Government as represented by the National Security Agency.

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license has fifteen (15) days from the date of this notice to file written objections along with any supporting evidence, if any.

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with the National Security Agency Technology Transfer Program, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6541, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6541.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marian T. Roche, Director, Technology Transfer Program, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6541, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6541, telephone (443) 479-9569.

Dated: May 28, 2009.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. E9-12883 Filed 6-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3327 

To add joining a foreign terrorist organization or engaging in or supporting 

hostilities against the United States or its allies to the list of acts 

for which United States nationals would lose their nationality. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 6, 2010 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To add joining a foreign terrorist organization or engaging 

in or supporting hostilities against the United States 

or its allies to the list of acts for which United States 

nationals would lose their nationality. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Terrorist Expatriation 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LOSS OF NATIONALITY. 

7 Section 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

8 (8 U.S.C. 1481) is amended— 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3327 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a)— 

2 (A) in each of paragraphs (1) through (6), 

3 by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

4 (B) in paragraph (7), by striking the pe5 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

6 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(8)(A) providing material support or resources 

8 to a foreign terrorist organization; 

9 ‘‘(B) engaging in, or purposefully and materi10 ally supporting, hostilities against the United States; 

11 or 

12 ‘‘(C) engaging in, or purposefully and materi13 ally supporting, hostilities against any country or 

14 armed force that is— 

15 ‘‘(i) directly engaged along with the United 

16 States in hostilities engaged in by the United 

17 States; or 

18 ‘‘(ii) providing direct operational support 

19 to the United States in hostilities engaged in by 

20 the United States.’’; and 

21 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

22 ‘‘(c) For purposes of this section— 

23 ‘‘(1) the term ‘foreign terrorist organization’ 

24 means an organization so designated by the Sec25 retary pursuant to section 219(a); 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3327 IS

1 ‘‘(2) the term ‘hostilities’ means any conflict 

2 subject to the laws of war; and 

3 ‘‘(3) the term ‘material support or resources’ 

4 has the meaning given the term in section 2339A of 

5 title 18, United States Code.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
| (1)   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |  Alliance Health,      Inc. |                                |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                         |                             |                                |   |
|                         |                             |                                |   |
| Dated:      January 23, 2009 |                             | /s/      Sarkis J. Kechejian, M. D. |   |
|                         |                             | Sarkis      J. Kechejian, M. D.     |   |
|                         |                             | Chief      Executive Officer,       |   |
|                         |                             | and      Chief Financial Officer    |   |

----
Exhibit 10.9
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Agreement st Effective Date Employer Executive
      1. Definitions.
  Base Salary
 Board
 Cause.
 American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 1




---



##### 



Change of Control Exempted Transaction
 Continuing Directors
 Date of Termination.
 Disability
 American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 2




---



##### 



Exchange Act
 Fiduciary Breach
 Good Reason.
     ICP
 Notice of Termination Section
11
 American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 3




---



##### 



Person
 Voting Stock
 2. Term of Employment.
 Section 2
  3. Compensation and Benefits.
 Base Salary
   American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 4




---



##### 



4. Termination.
 Termination Due to Death
 Termination Due to Disability
 Termination by Executive by Resignation
 Termination by the Employer Other Than for Death, Disability or Cause
 American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 5




---



##### 



Termination for Cause.
 Termination by the Executive for Good Reason Payment Period
  Termination by Mutual Consent.
 Cooperation with Employer After Termination of Employment
 American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 6




---



##### 



Full Discharge of Employer Obligations
 Access to Computers Systems following Termination
 Vesting of Stock Options
 Effect of Termination on Participation in Incentive Compensation Plan
 5. Mitigation; Exclusivity of Benefits; Notice of Other Employment .
  American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 7




---



##### 



Section 4(b) 4(d)
 6. Withholding.
  7. Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation of Customers and Employees.
     American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 8




---



##### 



Provided however Provided further, Provided further,
  Person
 Customer
 Competing Business/Competing Services
 Employee
 Restricted Period
 American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 9




---



##### 



8. Confidential Information, Return of Corporate Property.
 Confidential Information:
 Return of Employer Property.
 9. Survival Beyond Termination.
  American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 10




---



##### 



10. Assignability.
  11. Notice.
   
   
 
  
 12. General Provisions.
 Amendment and Waiver.
 American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 11




---



##### 



Non-Waiver of Breach.
 Severability.
 Governing Law.
 Entire Agreement; Termination of Prior Agreement.
 Binding Effect.
 Counterparts.
 Arbitration
 American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 12




---



##### 



AAA
  Sanctions Code .
  American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 13




---



##### 



Signature page follows
 American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 14




---



##### 



American
Locker Group Incorporated, a Delaware corporationBy:
    /s/ John E. HarrisName:
    John E. HarrisIts:      Chairman of the Board/s/ Paul M. ZaidinsPaul M. Zaidins American Locker Group Incorporated  Employment Agreement
 15
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 106 (Thursday, June 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26851-26852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13006]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1184-000]

NaturEner Power Watch, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

May 28, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
NaturEner Power Watch, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is June 18, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a

[[Page 26852]]

document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail [email protected]. or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13006 Filed 6-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David M. Harnett, Appellant.

Submitted December 6, 2010;

decided December 14, 2010

*939Motion by New York Civil Liberties Union for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF  SEPTEMBER  30, 1998 AND THE  STATEMENT OF  OPERATIONS  FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 824098
<NAME> SCOTTSDALE LAND TRUST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,313,768
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 16,650,866
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,734,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,129,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,734,475
<SALES>                                      5,391,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,157,328
<CGS>                                        2,625,610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,969,779
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,969,779
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,969,779
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    59.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 107 (Friday, June 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13194]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Princeton University


Notice of Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of 
Scientific Instruments

This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 
Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 
3705, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14\th\ and Constitution Ave, NW, 
Washington, D.C.

Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments 
of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described 
below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time of its order.
Docket Number: 09-013. Applicant: Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 
08544. Instrument: Electron Beam Evaporator. Manufacturer: Plassys, 
France. Intended Use: See notice at 74 FR 20459, May 4, 2009. Reasons: 
This instrument can make low-defect aluminum Josephson junctions, a 
necessary component of all quantum bits. This evaporator is unique in 
that it offers full state rotation, in-situ angle control for bilayer 
Josephson junction fabrication and controlled oxidation. Stage rotation 
is necessary to fabricated Josephson junctions in a single deposition 
process, which is essential in fabricating devises with long coherence.

    Dated: June 1, 2009.
Christopher Cassel,
Acting Director Subsidies Enforcement Office Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-13194 Filed 6-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
97-394.

#### Scott v. Money.

In Habeas Corpus. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
(October 10, 2006)

#### James Abenante et al., Plaintiffs, v Star Gas Corporation, Doing Business as Coleman Gas Service, Defendant. William M. Weisberg, Nonparty Appellant; Meiselman, Denlea, Packman & Eberz, P.C., Nonparty Respondent.

[821 NYS2d 911]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, William M. Weisberg, the plaintiff James Abenante’s outgoing attorney, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Berry, J), dated September 30, 2005, which granted his motion to apportion an attorney’s fee between himself and Meiselman, Denlea, Packman & Eberz, PC., the plaintiff James Abenante’s incoming attorney, only to the extent of awarding him 1% of the net attorney’s fee, i.e., the sum of $10,699.64.

*639Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

When there is a fee dispute between outgoing and incoming attorneys, “[t]he outgoing attorney may elect to take compensation on the basis of a presently fixed dollar amount based upon quantum meruit for the reasonable value of services or, in lieu thereof, the outgoing attorney has the right to elect a contingent percentage fee based on the proportionate share of the work performed on the whole case” *(Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co.,*73 NY2d 454, 458 [1989]). There is no dispute that William M. Weisberg elected to receive a contingent percentage fee. When considering the amount of time spent by each attorney on the case, the work performed, and the amount of recovery for the client *(see Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., supra*at 458), the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in fixing Weisberg’s fee at $10,699.64, which was 1% of the total attorney’s fee.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are either improperly raised for the first time on appeal or without merit. Miller, J.E, Luciano, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.