alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committees on Appellate, Bankruptcy, Civil, Criminal, and Evidence Rules. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Cancellation of Open Hearings. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The following public hearings on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate, Bankruptcy, Civil, Criminal, and Evidence Rules, have been canceled: Evidence Rules Hearing, January 13, 2009, in San Antonio, TX; Criminal Rules Hearing, January 16, 2009, in Los Angeles, CA; Bankruptcy Rules Hearing, January 23, 2009, in New York, NY; Evidence Rules Hearing, January 26, 2008, in Atlanta, GA; Appellate Rules Hearing, January 30, 2009, in Washington, DC; and Bankruptcy Rules Hearing, February 6, 2009, in San Francisco, CA. [Original notice of hearings appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on July 29, 2008.]                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United State Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820. 

Dated: January 15, 2009. 

John K. Rabiej, 

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. E9-1401 Filed 1-23-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at June 30, 1999 (Unaudited) and
the Consolidated Statement of Income for the six months ended June 30, 1999
(Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          311,036
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,274,464
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               307,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (307,840)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.23)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.0

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Annual Report of Andrea Electronics Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                            
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 28, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ DOUGLAS J. ANDREA                                                                      
|                     |  |  |  | Douglas J. Andrea                                                                          
|                     |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Corporate Secretary          
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | /s/ CORISA L. GUIFFRE                                                                      
|                     |  |  |  | Corisa L. Guiffre Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Assistant Corporate Secretary
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.l.



                Supplemental Benefits Agreement
                dated July 9, 1990 and December 6, 1990
                between M.A. Stein and the Parent

<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.l.



              Supplemental Benefits Agreement dated July 9, 1990



                      [Bank of America NT&SA Letterhead]



                                 July 9, 1990



Mr. Martin A. Stein
Executive Vice President
BankAmerica Systems Engineering #3001
San Francisco

Re:  Special Annuity
     ---------------

Dear Marty:

     Per the terms of your employment offer, we agree to pay you an annual
benefit of $20,000, payable monthly, commencing at age 65 and ceasing upon your
death.

     I just wanted to inform you that the Benefit Department is accruing for
this benefit.  As detailed in your offer letter, these payments are separate
from any benefits you may receive from the BankAmeraccount and BankAmerishare
plans.

     A copy of this letter is being included in your Personnel file and the
Retirements department for future reference and planning.


                                          Sincerely,

                                          /s/  ROBERT N. BECK

                                          Robert N. Beck




4129352
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.l.



            Supplemental Benefits Agreement dated December 6, 1990



                      [Bank of America NT&SA Letterhead]



                                 December 6, 1990



Marty Stein
Executive Vice President
BASE Executive Office #3789


Dear Marty:

     Per the terms of your offer letter, effective September 1990 you became
vested in an equivalent benefit of $20,000 per year (payable monthly) commencing
the month you reach age 65 and with all payments ceasing upon death.  These
benefits are separate from the BankAmeraccount and BankAmerishare plans.  These
payments were to provide you a benefit equivalent to the retirement benefits
that would have been vested at Paine Webber.

     If you have any questions regarding this issue, please let me know.

                                          Sincerely,

                                          /s/ ROBERT N. BECK

                                          Robert N. Beck



4129352
97-6.

#### State v. Rooney.

Butler App. No. CA96-01-020. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of conflict by the Court of Appeals for Butler County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due March 31, 1997, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua sponte.*
Exhibit 99

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Information provided by Arvin from time to time, including statements in Arvin's
Annual Report on Form 10-K and in documents that are incorporated by reference
in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, may constitute forward-looking statements, as
that term is defined in the Securities Reform Act of 1995. These statements are
subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include
information concerning Arvin's anticipated financial performance, business
prospects, technological developments, Year 2000 plans and risks, new products,
research and development activities and similar matters, including the effect of
recent acquisitions. These forward-looking statements generally are accompanied
by words such as "believes," "anticipates," "expects," "estimates," "should,"
"planned," "outlook," "goal" and "on target" or similar expressions. You should
understand that forward-looking statements are not guarantees since there are
inherent difficulties in predicting future results. Actual results could differ
materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.

Risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance and results
of Arvin's business include the following:

(1)  general economic and competitive conditions in the markets and countries in
     which Arvin operates;

(2)  strikes or other work stoppages affecting Arvin or its major customers or
     suppliers;

(3)  the level of consumer demand for new vehicles equipped with Arvin's
     products;

(4) Arvin's ability to continue to control and reduce its costs of production;

(5)  the level of consumer demand for Arvin's replacement products, which varies
     based on such factors as the severity of winter weather and the age of
     automobiles in Arvin's markets, as well as general economic conditions;

(6)  the impact on demand for Arvin's replacement products of prior improvements
     in original equipment product quality;

(7)  Arvin's ability to integrate recently acquired businesses in a timely and
     cost-effective manner;

(8)  the effect of changes in the distribution channels for replacement
     products;

(9)  the effect of technological change;

(10) the risks inherent in international operations and joint ventures;

(11) the strength of the U.S. dollar against currencies of other countries where
     Arvin operates; and

(12) changes in financial markets affecting Arvin's financial structure and its
     cost of capital and borrowed money.

Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should
underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from
those described in the forward-looking statement. Arvin does not intend to
update forward-looking statements.

                                       79
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley Paul DRAKE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50593

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 20, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Walter Mabry Reaves, Jr., Law Offices of Walter Reaves, West, TX, William Wilson Johnston, Johnson & Johnson, Waco, TX, for Defendani>-Appellant.

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In this interlocutory appeal, Stanley Drake argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss a one-count indictment for distribution of hydrocodone on the ground of double jeopardy. We review *de novo. See United States v. Delgado,*256 F.3d 264, 270 (5th Cir.2001).

Drake argues that state officials were aware that he was on probation by the Texas State Board of Pharmacy for the same misconduct alleged in his federal indictment. He argues that the delay in the instant prosecution by the federal government establishes a sham prosecution effected by state officials manipulating the federal prosecution.

The “dual sovereignty” doctrine provides that a person may be prosecuted for the same act by both state and federal governments. *United States v. Moore,*958 F.2d 646, 650 (5th Cir.1992). To establish the narrow exception of a “sham prosecution” to the dual sovereignty doctrine, Drake must demonstrate that one sovereign manipulated the other into the subsequent prosecution. *See Bartkus v. Illinois,*359 U.S. 121, 123-24, 79 S.Ct. 676, 3 L.Ed.2d 684 (1959); *United States v. Angleton,*314 F.3d 767, 774 (5th Cir.2002).

Drake fails to meet the arduous burden of demonstrating a sham prosecution. *See United States v. Cooper,*949 F.2d 737, 751 (5th Cir.1991). His allegations of delay alone will not suffice to establish that the federal government was manipulated by state officials in the instant proceedings. *See Angleton,*314 F.3d at 774. Because Drake failed to allege sufficient facts to support his allegations of a sham prosecution, the district court did not abuse its discretion in failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the issue of double jeopardy. *See Dickens v. Lewis,*750 F.2d 1251, 1255 (5th Cir.1984); *United States v. Harrelson,*705 F.2d 733, 737 (5th Cir.1983).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Rajendra ULLAL, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

. No. 05-72367.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Decided June 19, 2006.

Judith Lott, Newark, CA, for Petitioner.

*731Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Steven J. Saltiel, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: WALLACE, KLEINFELD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rajendra Ullal, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence, *Hakeem v. INS,*273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir. 2001), we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s partial adverse credibility determination. Ullal testified that he fears his father will have him killed if he returns to India because he has converted to Christianity, yet he failed to mention this purported fear in his asylum application or his otherwise detailed declaration submitted two weeks before his merits hearing. *See Alvarez-Santos v. INS,*332 F.3d 1245, 1254 (9th Cir.2003) (upholding adverse credibility finding where alien failed to mention pivotal event in asylum application).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s conclusion that Ullal is not eligible for withholding of removal because he could relocate safely in India. *See Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 995, 998-99 (9th Cir.2003) (relying on a country report to determine the reasonableness of internal relocation). Contrary to Ullal’s assertion, both the BIA and IJ properly considered background material on India to determine that Ullal could safely relocate. *See id.*

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory Committee will meet 
in Lakeview Oregon, for the purpose of evaluating and recommending 
resource management projects for funding in FY 2010, under the 
provisions of Title II of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-
Determination Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-343).

DATES: The meeting will be held on July 21 and 22, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Lakeview Interagency 
Office, 1301 South G Street, Lakeview, OR 97630.
    Send written comments to Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory 
Committee, c/o USDA Forest Service, 2819 Dahlia Street, Klamath Falls, 
OR 97601 or electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8aebede5fdebe4caecf9a4ecefeea4fff9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d7c7a726a7c735d7b6e337b787933686e">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Gowan, Designated Federal 
Official, c/o Klamath Ranger District, 2819 Dahlia Street, Klamath 
Falls, OR 97601, telephone (541) 883-6741.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agenda will include a review of FY 2010 
Title II project proposals submitted by the Forest Service, the public, 
non-profits and other agencies, presentations by project proponents, 
and final recommendations for funding of fiscal year 2010 projects.
    All Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory Committee Meetings are 
open to the public. Public input and comment forum will take place in 
the afternoon of July 22, 2009. Interested citizens are encouraged to 
attend.

    Dated: June 1, 2009.
Amy Gowan,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. E9-13311 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 10-K and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000009548
<NAME> BANGOR HYDRO-ELECTRIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      218,440
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     48,666
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          35,763
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       263,207
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 566,076
<COMMON>                                        36,508
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       56,611
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             10,073
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 103,192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,070
<PREFERRED>                                      4,734
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           288,075
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       35,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   13,646
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        3,923
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 106,066
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  566,076
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      184,914
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             1,422
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     159,823
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     161,245
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         23,669
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 760
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  24,429
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        20,092
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,337
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,702
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    2,635
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         6,319
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       17,597
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       (164,522)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12.1

                         ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES(A)
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Twelve Months Ended
                                                             December 31,
                                       --------------------------------------------------------
                                         2001        2000        1999        1998        1997
                                       --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
<S>                                    <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings:
  Income from continuing operations    $280,688    $306,594    $268,322    $255,247    $251,493
  Income taxes                          183,136     195,665     133,015     133,452     129,986
  Fixed Charges                         166,939     179,381     179,088     183,398     189,600
                                       --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
     Total                              630,763     681,640     580,425     572,097     571,079
                                       ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

Fixed Charges:
  Interest charges                      130,525     141,886     140,948     144,695     150,335
  Amortization of debt discount           2,650       2,105       2,084       2,410       2,336
  Estimated interest portion of
     annual rents                        33,764      35,390      36,056      36,293      36,929
                                       --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
     Total fixed charges                166,939     179,381     179,088     183,398     189,600
                                       ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
  (rounded down)                           3.77        3.79        3.24        3.11        3.01
                                       ========    ========    ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>

----------
(a)  We have  reclassified  certain prior year amounts to conform to the current
     year presentation.