alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STEIN et al. v. YOUNGSTOWN STEEL CAR CORPORATION.

Civ. No. 24152.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

Dec. 20, 1946.

John Ruffalo, of Youngstown, Ohio and A. M. Oliver, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

A. M. Henderson, of Youngstown, Ohio, for defendant.

JONES, District Judge.

In view of the position which I take, and earlier have taken, on the question here presented, the oral argument requested by the defendant seems unnecessary. See memorandum in Remley et al. v. Triangle Publications, Inc., et al., No. 23052, Civil, filed October 3, 1946.

The plaintiffs here seek to recover from the defendant certain unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages amounting to $8,000, and attorneys’ fees, pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of .1938, 29 U.S. C.A. § 201 et seq. The periods of employment for which the plaintiffs seek to recover begin on July 1, 1940. The action was filed on June 28, 1946.

On August 27, 1946, plaintiffs served 20 interrogatories on the defendant. Defendant objected to certain of these interrogatories which pertained to the plaintiffs’ employment prior to July 8, 1943. The ground of objection is that Section 11225 of the Ohio General Code establishes a three year period of limitation for actions by employees for the recovery of unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime compensation or liquidated damages therefor. Section 725, Title 28 U.S.C.A., provides that: “The laws of the several States, except where the Constitution, treaties, or statutes of the United States otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law, in the courts of the United States, in cases where they'apply.”

Inasmuch as the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 contains no provision limiting the time for commencement of actions arising thereunder, the Federal courts have generally followed the state statutes of limitations covering such actions. The only cases found where a Federal court has not applied the state statute of limitations to an action under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 are those cases wherein the court found that the state statute of limitations discriminated against such actions, or Federal actions in general, in that the statute was enacted for the purpose of depriving persons of a reasonable time within which to commence such actions.

The plaintiffs here have failed to point out that Section 11225 of the Ohio General Code is discriminatory. Indeed, the language of that Section is general and would apply as well to state legislation in this field. Moreover the time limit (three years) is reasonable considering the fact that some Federal courts have held that periods of two years are not unreasonable.

The ruling made in Remley v. Triangle Publications, Inc., supra, will be adhered to and defendant’s objections to interrogatories will be sustained as to those portions of interrogatories four, five and eight which pertain to the plaintiffs’ employment prior to July 8, 1943.

Order may be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                   EXHIBIT 27
                             Financial Data Schedule

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of AquaPenn Spring Water Company, Inc. for the period ended
June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1,745
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,244
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (100)
<INVENTORY>                                    3,707
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              13,895
<PP&E>                                        48,638
<DEPRECIATION>                                (8,122)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                58,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         10,086
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                    46,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  58,865
<SALES>                                       35,910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              36,401
<CGS>                                         28,170
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 34,846
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (464)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,904
<INCOME-TAX>                                     773
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,131
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,131
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .15
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



WEB2 CORP.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the annual report of Web2 Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William A. Mobley, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods indicated.





|                    |     |                                     
|------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------
|Date:  May 20, 2008 | By: | /s/ WILLIAM A. MOBLEY, JR.          
|                    |     | William A. Mobley, Jr.              
|                    |     | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                    |     | (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 342 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 342

   To provide for the treatment of service as a member of the Alaska 
Territorial Guard during World War II as active service for purposes of 
              retired pay for members of the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 2009

Ms. Murkowski (for herself, Mr. Begich, and Mr. Inouye) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the treatment of service as a member of the Alaska 
Territorial Guard during World War II as active service for purposes of 
              retired pay for members of the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT AS ACTIVE SERVICE FOR RETIRED PAY PURPOSES OF 
              SERVICE AS A MEMBER OF THE ALASKA TERRITORIAL GUARD 
              DURING WORLD WAR II.

    (a) In General.--Service as a member of the Alaska Territorial 
Guard during World War II of any individual who was honorably 
discharged therefrom under section 8147 of the Department of Defense 
Appropriations Act, 2001 (Public Law 106-259; 114 Stat. 705) shall be 
treated as active service for purposes of the computation under chapter 
71, 371, or 1223 of title 10, United States Code, as applicable, of the 
retired pay to which such individual may be entitled under title 10, 
United States Code.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall apply with respect to 
amounts of retired pay payable under title 10, United States Code, for 
months beginning on or after August 9, 2000. No retired pay shall be 
paid to any individual by reason of subsection (a) for any period 
before that date.
    (c) World War II Defined.--In this section, the term ``World War 
II'' has the meaning given that term in section 101(8) of title 38, 
United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Ryan G., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 399]

In two related juvenile delinquency proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Ryan G. appeals from (1) an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated February 21, 2013, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated January 2, 2013, made upon his admission, finding that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for placement in a limited secure facility for a period of 18 months under docket No. D-02320-12, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court, also dated February 21, 2013, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated September 12, 2012, made upon his admission, finding that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of robbery in the third degree, adjudged him to he a juvenile delinquent, and placed him in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for placement in a limited secure facility for a period of *71318 months under docket No. D-17640-12, with credit for time spent in detention pending disposition.

Ordered that the orders of disposition are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court has broad discretion in entering dispositional orders *(see*Family Ct Act § 141; *Matter of Leonard J.,*67 AD3d 911 [2009]; *Matter of Michael L.,*64 AD3d 780, 781 [2009]; *Matter of Bruce B.,*54 AD3d 1031 [2008]), and its determination is accorded great deference *(see Matter of Paul T.,*107 AD3d 726, 727 [2013]). Here, with regard to the two subject orders of disposition, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in placing the appellant in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for placement in a limited secure facility for a period of 18 months. The record establishes that the dispositions were the least restrictive alternative consistent with the best interests of the appellant and the needs of the community *(see*Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]), particularly in light of, inter alia, his need for structure, supervision, and therapeutic services, his history of arrests and record of truancy, the findings in the mental health services report, and the recommendation in the probation report *(see Matter of Paul T.,*107 AD3d at 727; *Matter of Calvin L.,*83 AD3d 842, 843 [2011]; *Matter of Jesse F.J.,*83 AD3d 710, 711 [2011]; *Matter of Bruce B.,*54 AD3d at 1031-1032; *Matter of Quamel J.,*51 AD3d 793, 794 [2008]; *Matter of Joseph B.,*49 AD3d 1309 [2008]). Rivera, J.E, Dillon, Chambers and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
.

May 20, 2004

ToddAraujo

Akin Gump StraussHauer & Feld LLP

1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036-1564

Dear Mr. Araujo:

This letter responds to your request that the National Indian Gaming Commission

("NIGC") review and approve the amended Seneca Nation of Indians Class III Gaming

Ordinance of 2002 as Amended ("Class III Ordinance as Amended"), which was received

by the NIGC on April 26, 2004. The ClassIII Ordinance as Amended was approved by

the NIGC on November 26, 2002. The amendment underreview was adopted on April

10, 2004, by Gaming Law Resolution No. R-04-10-04-11; it expands the power and

responsi .. 0 the neca Gaming Authority to include Class II gaming. This letter

con . utes approva f the amended Class III Ordinance as Amended.

e document for our review. If you have any questions, please

atherine Zebell at (202) 632-7003.

cc: Michael Green, Seneca Gaming Authority

NATIONALHEADQUARTERS1441 LSt. NW, Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 WWW.NIGC.GOV

REGIONALOFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA: Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK
| Subsidiaries                                                 |   | State      or Jurisdictionof      Incorporation |   | Percentage      of VotingSecurities      Owned |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|                                                         |   |                                            |   |                                           |
| AiC      Analysts Limited                                    |   | United      Kingdom                             |   | 100.0%                                         |
|                                                         |   |                                            |   |                                           |
| Medical      Concepts Staffing, Inc.                         |   | Minnesota                                       |   | 100.0%                                         |
|                                                         |   |                                            |   |                                           |
| Analysts      International Strategic Sourcing Services, LLC |   | Minnesota                                       |   | 100.0%                                         |
|                                                         |   |                                            |   |                                           |
| Analysts      International Business Resources Services, LLC |   | Minnesota                                       |   | 100.0%                                         |
|                                                         |   |                                            |   |                                           |
| Analysts      International Business Solutions Services, LLC |   | Minnesota                                       |   | 100.0%                                         |
|                                                         |   |                                            |   |                                           |
| Analysts      International Management Services, LLC         |   | Minnesota                                       |   | 100.0%                                         |
NAL /.
4,° No,

= Y
5 é
<7)

~
VG com we?

MAY - 3 2010

Robert Martin, Chairman
Morongo band of Mission Indians
12700 Pumarra Road

Banning, CA 92220

Re: Morongo Band of Mission Indians Gaming Ordinance Amendment
Dear Chairman Martin:

This letter responds to your request to the National Indian Gaming Commission
(NIGC) to review and approve an amendment to the Morongo Band of Mission Indians
(Tribe) Tribal Gaming Ordinance (Amendment). The Amendment was adopted by the
Tribal Council Resolution No. 041510-02 on April 15, 2010, and submitted to the NIGC
on April 20, 2010.

This letter constitutes approval of the Amendment to the tribal gaming ordinance.
Thank you for submitting the Amendment for my review and approval. The NIGC staff and
I look forward to working with you and the Tribe on future gaming issues. If you have any
questions or require assistance, please do not hesitate to contact John Hay, Senior Attorney,
at 202-632-7003.

Sincerel}

George ¥. Skibine
Acting Chairman

el: 202.632.7003 Fax 202.632.7066 WWww.NiGc.cov

NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1441 L St. NW, Suite 9100, Washingto!

Phoenix, AZ: St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK

REGIONAL OFFICES Portla
Form Last Updated by NYSE on February 8, 2005

# 

# 

Annual CEO Certification (Section 303A.12(a))

As the Chief Executive Officer of The Fairchild Corporation, and as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, I hereby certify that, as of the date hereof, I am not aware of any violation by the Company of NYSEs Corporate Governance listing standards, other than has been notified to the Exchange pursuant to Section 303A.12(b) and disclosed as Exhibit H to the Companys Section 303A Annual Written Affirmation.

Print Name:     Jeffrey J. Steiner

Title:                Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Note: THE NYSE WILL NOT ACCEPT IF RETYPED, MODIFIED OR IF ANY TEXT IS DELETED. If you have any questions regarding applicability to your companys circumstances, please call the Corporate Governance Department prior to submission.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 111 (Thursday, June 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13683]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Joint Hearing with the Department 
of Labor to examine target date funds and similar investment options on 
Thursday, June 18, 2009 beginning at 9 a.m.
    The Joint Hearing will take place in the Auditorium of the 
Department of Labor's headquarters at 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC. The Joint Hearing will be open to the public with 
seating on a first-come, first-served basis. Visitors will be subject 
to security checks.
    Discussion topics at the Joint Hearing will include issues related 
to how target date fund managers determine asset allocations and 
changes to asset allocations (including glide paths) over the course of 
a fund's operation; how they select and monitor underlying investments; 
how the foregoing and related risks are disclosed to investors; and the 
approaches or factors for comparing and evaluating target date funds. 
Joint Hearing participants will include representatives of plan 
participants and beneficiaries, plan sponsors, investor organizations, 
academia and the financial services industry.
    For further information, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: June 5, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13683 Filed 6-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
LANDMARK REALTY SERVICES CORPORATION

3310 WEST END AVENUE, SUITE 490

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37203



Mary Anne Collins

Telephone (615) 292-1040

Facsimile (615) 292-2003

November 13, 2003
VIA EDGAR



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE: Hickory Lenders, Ltd. (the "Registrant")
Form 10-Q for Quarter Ended September 30, 2003

Ladies and Gentleman:

On behalf of the above named registrant and in accordance with Regulation S-T, we are herewith filing electronically the Registrant's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. Please notify me at (615) 292-1040 immediately if you encounter any difficulties in receiving this filing electronically.

Very truly yours,
 
BY: /s/ Mary Anne Collins
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer  of ASI  Technology  Corporation  (the  "Company"),  in his
capacity and as of the date set forth below, does hereby certify with respect to
the Annual  Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the nine month period ended
September 30, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the
"10-KSB Report") that to his knowledge:

     (1) the 10-KSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information  contained in the 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  December 27, 2005


                              /s/ ERIC M. POLIS
                              -------------------------
                              Eric M. Polis, Treasurer and Principal
                              Financial Officer of ASI Technology Corporation


(A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to ASI  Technology  Corporation  and will be retained by ASI Technology
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.)