alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James E. SIGLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Thomas McBRIDE, Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-6138.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 2006.

Decided: June 29, 2006.

James E. Sigley, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James E. Sigley seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dis-positive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sigley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ENRIQUE GURROLA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-10-00037-CR

Appeal from the

243rd Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20090D01393) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to withdraw his notice of appeal pursuant

to TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2(a). Appellant has personally signed his request and has filed it prior to the

appellate court’s decision. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2(a). Further, a duplicate copy has been filed

with this Court and has been forwarded to the trial court clerk. See id. As the motion complies

with the requirements of Rule 42.2(a), we GRANT Appellant’s motion, and dismiss the appeal.

February 17, 2010

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Patriot Energy Corporation because of questions regarding the accuracy of assertions by Patriot Energy Corporation in press releases to investors concerning, among other things: (1) The company's business agreements and (2) a tender offer for Patriot Energy Corporation's outstanding shares.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of Patriot Energy Corp.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities Patriot Energy Corp. is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on June 2, 2009, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on June 15, 2009.

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-13144 Filed 6-2-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Bill Anoatubby

tile Goyernor 

11.l�L la�aw Chris Anoatubby

f l,f t.,,111.1:)1 Lt. Goyernor ation OFFICE OF THE GAMING COMMISSIONER

1500 N. COUNTRY CLUB ROAD I PMB 228,902 ARLINGTON CENTER I ADA, OK 74820

Mr. Sequoyah Simermeyer, Chaitperson 

National Indian Gaming Commission 

1849 C. Street NW 

Mail Stop #1621 

Washington, D.C. 20240 

Re: Tribal Comments on July 2021 Topics of Consultation 

Dear Chairperson Simermeyer & Commission members: 

August 12, 2021 

Included in with this letter are the Chickasaw Nation's comments regarding the topics 

presented for consultation at virtual sessions held on July 27-28, 2021, particularly regarding the 

NIGC's proposed changes to its Consultation Policy, Strategic Plan, and regulations related to key 

employees and primary management officials, fees, facility licenses notifications, and management 

contr,icts. 

Thank you for your consideration of our comments. 

1
#### Richbell Information Services, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiff, v Jupiter Partners L.P., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. Richbell Information Services, Inc., et al., Counterclaim Defendants.

[822 NYS2d 705]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered November 9, 2005, unanimously withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the stipulation of the parties hereto. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                     4,677,568
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     164,906
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          350,388
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                      1,138,280
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                6,331,142
<COMMON>                                        178,162
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                     1,142,364
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             528,798
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                1,849,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            29,110
<PREFERRED>                                     142,051
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                          1,953,162
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                    0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                             0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  130,750
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   104,068
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                             0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                           0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                      0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                2,122,677
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                 6,331,142
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                     1,878,553
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            184,737
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    1,321,991
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                    1,506,728
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         371,825
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               21,586
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  393,411
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        141,918
<NET-INCOME>                                    251,493
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      12,803
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   238,690
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        170,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       126,426
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          554,508
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0


</TABLE>
For Immediate Release Media Contact: Kim Myers

(202) 632-7003

2016 Indian Gaming Revenues Increased 4.4%

WASHINGTON – July 17, 2017- Today Chairman Jonodev Osceola Chaudhuri, Vice Chair Kathryn

Isom-Clause, and Associate Commissioner Sequoyah Simermeyer of the National Indian Gaming

Commission (NIGC) released the Fiscal Year 2016 Gross Gaming Revenue numbers totaling $31.2 

billion, an overall increase of 4.4%.

“The success reflected in the 2016 gross gaming revenue is due, at least in part, to the Indian Gaming 

Regulatory Act’s promotion of tribal self-determination principles,” said the Chair of the NIGC, Jonodev 

O. Chaudhuri.

In the 1970s rural Tribes began gaming, mostly as small bingo facilities, as a means to provide revenue 

and jobs for their people and to manifest self-determination. The same holds true today as is evident by 

57% of gaming revenue being generated by small or moderately sized Indian gaming operations grossing

less than $25 million per year. For gaming tribes, revenue has become a lifeline to generate economic 

development and supplement moderate funding received from federal government programs and services. 

Revenues are calculated based on 484 independently audited financial statements, comprised of 244

federally recognized Tribes across 28 States. The GGR for an operation is calculated based on (1) the 

amount wagered minus winnings returned to players and (2) earnings before salaries, tribal-state 

compacts and operating expenses. Each of the NIGC administrative regions showed growth during FY16

with the following increases being reported:

• Sacramento Region (6.3%)

• Oklahoma City Region (5.7%)

• Portland Region (5.1%)

• Phoenix Region (4.4%)

• Tulsa Region (4.0%)

• Washington, DC Region (3.8%) 

• St. Paul Region (1.1%)

“The stable growth is reflective of a healthy and well regulated industry with a tremendous 

impact on local and state economies,” said Chairman Chaudhuri. “When Congress passed IGRA 

almost thirty years ago, it expressly cited in its findings and purposes the long standing federal 

policy goal to promote tribal economic development, tribal self-sufficiency, and strong tribal 

governments; no other economic driver has been able to do that for Indian country as successfully 

as gaming,” he said.

###

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act created the National Indian Gaming Commission to support tribal 

self-sufficiency and the integrity of Indian gaming. The NIGC has developed four initiatives to support 

its mission including (1) To protect against anything that amounts to gamesmanship on the backs of 

tribes; (2) To stay ahead of the Technology Curve; (3) Rural outreach; and (4) To maintain a strong 

workforce within NIGC and with its tribal regulatory partners. To learn more, visit www.nigc.gov and 

follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1



                                  Dominix, Inc
                               40 Marquette Drive
                            Smithtown, New York 11787



CERTICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Dominix,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form10-QSB  for the period ending March 31, 2003,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on May 23, 2003 (the "Report"),  I, Andrew J. Schenker,
President and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Andrew J. Schenker
-------------
Andrew J. Schenker
President and Chief Financial Officer
May 23, 2003

                                       6
<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 29 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.29
                                        Agreed to April 28, 2005        

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, April 28, 2005, Friday, April 29, 2005, Saturday, April 30, 
2005, or Sunday, May 1, 2005, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until Monday, May 9, 2005, at a time to be 
specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate or his designee, after 
consultation with the Minority Leader, shall notify the Members of the 
Senate to reassemble whenever, in his opinion, the public interest 
shall warrant it.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
#### Miami County Bar Association *v.*Thompson.

[Cite as *Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Thompson*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 103.]

(No. 96-1465

Submitted January 8, 1997

Decided April 2, 1997.)

*104
      *Dale G. Davis*and *James D. Utrecht,*for relator.

*Jack W. Skogstrom*and *David Greer,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We accept the findings and conclusions of the board, but believe that a more stringent penalty is warranted. Respondent represented the lender in this case, but his arrangement with the parties enabled him to receive a fee from the borrower for each loan made by the lender. Despite the fact that the lender independently decided to make each loan, this arrangement put respondent in a position where he could profit by withholding information from or exercising influence on the lender.

A lawyer should avoid even the appearance of impropriety and the implication that his professional judgment on behalf of a client could be affected by the *105lawyer’s own interests. Respondent is therefore suspended for one year from the practice of law. Costs are taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
[974 NE2d 1169, 950 NYS2d 727]

#### Maxine Mallory, as Executor of the Estate of Matthew Mallory, Deceased, Appellant, v Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.

Decided August 28, 2012

*979APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Shayne, Dachs, Corker, Sauer & Dachs, LLP,*Mineola *(Norman H. Dachs*of counsel), for appellant.

*Feldman, Rudy, Kirby & Farquharson, P.C.,*Jericho *(Brian R. Rudy*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.

Plaintiff sought compensation pursuant to decedent’s homeowner’s insurance for fire damage. Defendant sought to raise three affirmative defenses based on plaintiff’s alleged breach of the insurance policy. Under the facts of this case, the Appellate Division correctly determined that an insurer’s failure to comply with 11 NYCKR 216.6 (c) in processing a claim does not preclude that insurer from relying upon a policy exclusion to disclaim coverage.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, etc.
Airbus Helicopters H 125/ AS350 Series

Audio Requirements for USFS Cooperators 

RX 

ICS 

...-.-�- _,__________ ,.. 

RX 

ICS 

TX - Radio Transmit Capability 

RX - Radio Receive Capability 

I CS- Intercom Capability

April 9, 2024
Airbus Helicopters H 125/ AS350 Series

Audio Requirements for USFS Contracted

Helicopters Approved for Passengers

TX 

RX 

ICS 

RX 

ICS -

RX 

ICS 

TX 

RX 

ICS 

TX - Radio Transmit Capability 

RX - Radio Receive Capability 

I CS- Intercom Capability
Airbus Helicopters H 125/ AS350 Series 

Audio Requirements for USFS Helicopters

Contracted for Rotor Wing Aerial Supervision

The aft audio control shall be ceiling mounted

and face the middle of the two center PAX seats

TX 

RX 

ICS ffiu] RX 

,Q � ICS 

-0 ..., § -

u RX mm ICS

�

TX 

RX 

ICS 

TX - Radio Transmit Capability

RX - Radio Receive Capability

ICS - Intercom Capability
Exhibit 32


    Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Each of the undersigned officers of American Locker Group Incorporated (the
"Company"),  in such  capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  does hereby
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

1)   The Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual  period ended
     December 31, 2003 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of
     Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:    March 26, 2004

                                             /s/Edward F. Ruttenberg
                                             --------------------------
                                             Edward F. Ruttenberg
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                             /s/Wayne L. Nelson
                                             --------------------------
                                             Wayne L. Nelson
                                             Principal Accounting Officer
INDIAN GAMING OVERVIEW

CLASS I:

CLASS III:

15 TRIBES

27 GAMING

OPERATIONS

Indian gaming’s success also often means benefits to

surrounding communities & regional economies.

RECORD HIGH GGR FOR FY 21 WAS:

-$39 BILLION -

40% GROWTH FROM FY 20 & 19% FROM FY 19

INFO@NIGC.GOV

NIGC.GOV

ABOUT:

NIGC regulates Indian gaming to promote tribal

economic development, self-sufficiency and strong

tribal governments; to maintain the integrity of the

Indian gaming industry; and to ensure that tribes are

the primary beneficiaries of their gaming activities.

SEPTEMBER 2022

INDIAN GAMING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN ARIZONA

ARIZONA GAMING REVENUE FY21:

$2,453,909,959

NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

Enacted in 1988 as Public Law 100-497 and codified at 25 U.S.C. 2701, the Indian Gaming Regulatory

Act established the jurisdictional framework that presently governs Indian gaming. 

CLASS II:

Traditional Indian gaming & social gaming

for minimal prizes.

Game of chance commonly known as bingo, &

if played in the same location as pull tabs,

punch boards, tip jars, instant bingo, & other

games similar to bingo. Class II gaming also

includes non-banked card games.

All forms of gaming that are neither Class I

nor Class II. Commonly played in casinos.

GAMING CLASSES
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kirk Hanley, Appellant.

Submitted May 14, 2012;

decided May 31, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 11 Park Place, Suite 1601, New York, NY 10007 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
OFFICE OFTHE AlTORNEY OENERAL OFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

fionorablo Jaawra W. Straw5 

Count&' Attorney 

Uillaoy (fountp 

Raymondrlll4, TeJccrs 

Dear sir: 

sn pour letter 0 

opf514n in response 

ofb!di4 I:IX, Texa6 COn6tftUti.05 

maad 

uEe 6haUhav4 DO pow4rtoE4- 

h, or to 6uthorleb the re$4asSng :- 

in whole or in part, ths fndsbt- -" 

i or obligation of any 44rp43?atiO5 

0 this state or to any countp or 

subdltieion thereof, or (lither muniaipti 

uorporiation therein, except delfnqu4nt taxes whlah 

have be4n due for a perl4d of at 3.46st ten y46r6* 

(344. 68, iirt. 8, 6dbpt8d 814Cti45 W4V. 8, &k?%)" 
E@tzoiable Jaraer w. fitram, h&6 a 

Yrom the opinion of th6 Suprerr, Caurt, Janet 'I* 

pilllla6l6, 45 s* w. (PitI) 130, m qu4t6t 

* . . . 

9b6 6t6tUt66 iZOi@ ti6i4 to t-0 h6V6 BOIItrima pr4rieions for the aall4otl?~n of aemqu4ut tax46 by rrttoX&e$'s 03 Oth6T6 by OOntT48t6 

tar a *roentage a? tho tax, or t4x66, lnter48t, 

and ~penaltiO6 OOu60t6a. 96rOn'S Aanr Clr. &St., 

&6. 7%5&, 7344, -6. %t644 6IUI 788th. The : 

power to sake 4ontra4t6 ,UtldeF th.66 6tatut66 i6 

aubordlnate ii4 the general ~egirlativm pmbr to 

i~3po64, lmareas4, di&,njllh, of remit p4,aalti46 

ror tax a4linpuuroi~, ana th4 ~i6tOJUto or rwh 

oontract6, where kZ46 bar. adtbr becm paid 

nor raduord to ,jud@,ment, boaa not provent tlm 

rer&s8lon 6 tatuto *on beIn@ erfeatlvo, an6 thb 

d4lfllqU4nt t4Xpay4r h66 th4 R4Ck6 right to p6y 

bf8 t6XOS Without p&@lSg 0S6lti 

(60-Oa16b) that he woi&U6f~ hiii i%h+!%%ta 

n474r bean made. The rmisslon ,statuto ~agplier 

UU1OS6 peior to the offWQ%ire &at0 Of the 6t6tute th6 taxer ha4 actua12Y be46 asU.64t4d O_E 

rsducbd to, fisal~3ul6m48~ l . . .w 

YPM the above aatborlti86 rhioh you &iRdly iprr&6hbd U6 in y3ll.r brief, WXi CtOU6hUi4 that YOU&? Qu66tiOE 6hOti6 

be aaswered in the n4gatire. 

Yours vary truly