alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ATS Medical, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d- 15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors;
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/  Michael D. DaleName:
    Michael D. DaleTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
#### Nella Manko, Appellant, v Elton Strauss et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Submitted January 22, 2013;

decided April 25, 2013

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as denied appellant’s motion to renew her prior motion for poor person relief and for the assignment of counsel, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
iion.,D. 0. Oreo, pmge 3

In 4 Oar. Jur.,p. 53.7, uad 17 **C.J.S., p.**  **679 et**  **seq. it**  **3.8 maid:** 

**“Where an**  **agreeaent lm**  **l8wfu$ oa**  it.8 **fmae,** or is aapablr of belong executed in a lartul my, and the intention

of one of the mica is that it be 80 **exeautiid** he 18 mtltled to enfareeIt notwlthmtandlng

the other

party intended

8a lllegal 

### l bt, it ths fLr8tpor8on v88 uaavare of. **the illegal**  **Intention.**
**. .**  **. ”**  84lQ 1 III

mixhell VB. porter, 191 s. Y. 981, p. 986, %tia " Rovever,

it hma beenheld that 8 ~t7;04~inv~d5ank#t,vhi~i8 aotlllegd a@ unlawful, may be aqultabXg emteppe& to &spite the rflldlty

er the aantrwt. In'10 9!&. air.,p* bg, it 3.8 m&d: :,gl$~ i :, .?. : made, for the partlois aE0 pnsumed to k.wv the IBV. . -.i" 

## I Am to the’alrtake

mmde 0% authorltle8

gonerally

to be a8 i. 

## oe8luappurJwefllwlt~

ov8: 'Wllllmtan

on Ooalxautm,

Rev. Pd.,Vol. 5;.+&4414, oeoi 1580,

## et seq., it 18 Said:

"The 

### l aeprlnalpkthetpmhibit~ reeorrrp of-7 GY 8fterthedef~th88~ him posit maces it clo8rthat lfll8toTeP eqult7thisren8ybekfaiaroror~eaewhohamma&uluallnteral mistakela the focwtion ot a ~9..8&0$ ooatraot,

the effecrtof

lt lo em gherehere~
l trretloat1488t~ whollyUuOutca~. PIP pro m o ed l & h 6 o e a tmt < r8 O F a a n b m n o r e lief, . . . . lunderwxmng .up&b In stat0 vs. seholcRro8.,4 s. w. (241661, 66% it 18 said:Ron. D. D. finer,pege 4



### ABrH;rr

”
Biography

National Indian Gaming Commission

PRIVACY & RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER

TIM OSUMI

Tim Osumi serves as the Privacy & Records Management Officer for the National Indian Gaming Commission

(NIGC). In this position, Osumi oversees all privacy, records management matters, and is the agency’s designated 

Senior Agency Official for Privacy (SAOP). His responsibilities include monitoring and reporting on, agency 

compliance with the Privacy Act, Federal Records Act, Freedom of Information Act, and Paperwork Reduction Act and 

he is responsible for formulating agency policy and guidance on matters related to these statutes.

Prior to assuming this position in the Division of Technology, Osumi worked in the agency’s Office of the General 

Counsel where he developed and maintained the General Counsel’s case and document management application as 

well as assisted in the development of the agency’s Freedom of Information Act business processes.

On numerous occasions, Osumi has been recognized for his achievements including in 2019 when he was the recipient 

of the NIGC Chairman’s Award for his successful transitioning of the agency’s records from analog to electronic 

schedules and systems.

Osumi received a Bachelor’s degree from Georgetown University and has numerous certifications pertaining to 

information governance and regulatory compliance. 

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act created the National Indian Gaming Commission to support tribal self-sufficiency and the integrity of Indian gaming. 

NIGC oversees the efficient regulation of 524 gaming establishments operated by 248 tribes across 29 states.

Updated 1/11/2022
---

Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of China Granite Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, [to such officer's knowledge], that:

The Form 10-KSB for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2005(the
"Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: April 14, 2006 | /s/ Dong Chen                           
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------
|                      | Dong Chen, Chief Executive
  Officer    
|                      |                                         
|Dated: April 14, 2006 | /s/ Costas Takkas                       
|                      | Costas Takkas, Chief Financial
  Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32(e)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.





|/s/ E. Renae ConleyE. Renae Conley
Chair of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer of 
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	February 28, 2008
#### Bois *v.*Merriam.

*(Circuit Court, D. Nebraska.*

November 10, 1880.)

Void Tax Sale—Lies of Vexdbe fob Taxes Paid—Ixtekest.

In Equity.

*G. W. Seymour,*for complainant.

*E. F. Warren,*for respondent.

This cause was brought to set aside the tax deed of the respondent, and was decided by Judge McCrary, who held that the ruling of the state courts, in their interpretation of the statutes of their respective states, in these tax cases, would be followed by this court ordinarily, and in this case the report of the master is ratified and confirmed, as follows:

*First.*The complainant was the owner and in peaceable possession of lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, block 168, Nebraska City, Nebraska.

*Second.*On the twenty-third of February, A. D. 1876, the said lots above described wore sold by the then treasurer of Otoe county for the delinquent taxes of 1873, at private sale, to the assignor of the respondent, Merriam.

*Third.*The holder and owner of said tax certificate has paid the taxes upon said lots both prior and subsequent to said date. That from 1869 to 1875 the complainant had abundance of personal property in Otoe county out of which said taxes might have been made. Gen. St. 916; 4 Neb. 139; 8 Neb. 59; 7 Neb. 119, 123.

*Fourth.*The said tax sale of said real estate was illegal and void, and that said pretended tax deed is void upon its face. 6 Neb. 236; New Kev. vol. 445,453; New Kev. vol. 445, 447; Kev. Law's, §§ 113, 112.

*Fifth.*That the respondent be subrogated to the rights of the county, and decreed to have a lien upon said real estate for all the taxes by him paid, with 12 per cent, interest from the date of such payment, and that the respondent pay the costs of this action. 8 Neb. 92; Gen. St. 922, § 64.

*440
      *Sixth.*That the decree in this ease draw 10 per cent, interest from the date of the master’s report; and that the complainant have until May 12, 1881, to satisfy the decree.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel, July 20, 2009, 8 a.m. to July 24, 2009, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 27, 2009, 74 FR 25262.                

The previously published July 20-24, 2009, meeting has been changed to a one day meeting on July 24, 2009. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: June 8, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-13950 Filed 6-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,791]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 14, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Commercial Vehicle Group/Trim Systems, Dublin, Virginia. The workers at the subject facility produce truck interiors.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 20th day of May 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13903 Filed 6-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT        21.1

 

SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES AND STATE OR

JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION

 

 

| **UNITED STATES -**                           |                   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| Atwood Drilling, Inc.                         | Delaware               | 100%   |
| Atwood Hunter Co.                             | Delaware               | 100%   |
| Atwood Management, Inc.                       | Delaware               | 100%   |
| Atwood Oceanics Management, LP                | Delaware               | 100%   |
| ATW Management, Inc.                          | Delaware               | 100%   |
| Atwood Deep Seas, Ltd.                        | Texas                  | 100%   |
| **FOREIGN -**                                 |                   |   |
| Atwood Oceanics Drilling Pty. Ltd.            | Australia              | 100%   |
| Atwood Oceanics Australia Pty. Limited        | Australia              | 100%   |
| Atwood Oceanics Platforms Pty. Ltd.           | Australia              | 100%   |
| Atwood Oceanics Services Pty. Ltd.            | Australia              | 100%   |
| Atwood Oceanics West Tuna Pty. Ltd.           | Australia              | 100%   |
| Alpha Leasing Drilling Limited                | Mauritius              | 100%   |
| Atwood Oceanics Pacific Limited               | Cayman Islands, B.W.I. | 100%   |
| Alpha Offshore Drilling Services Company      | Cayman Islands, B.W.I. | 100%   |
| Atwood Oceanics International Limited         | Cayman Islands, B.W.I. | 100%   |
| Swiftdrill Offshore Drilling Services Company | Cayman Islands, B.W.I. | 100%   |
| Swiftdrill, Inc.                              | Cayman Islands, B.W.I. | 100%   |
| Atwood Oceanics Leasing Limited               | Malaysia               | 100%   |
| Atwood Oceanics (M) Sdn. Bhd.                 | Malaysia               | 100%   |
| Clearways Offshore Drilling Sdn. Bhd.         | Malaysia               | 49%    |
| Drillquest (M) Sdn. Bhd.                      | Malaysia               | 90%    |
| PT Alpha Offshore Drilling                    | Indonesia              | 100%   |
| PT Pentawood Offshore Drilling                | Indonesia              | 80%    |
| Aurora Offshore Services Gmbh                 | Germany                | 100%   |
| Swiftdrill Nigeria Limited                    | Nigeria                | 60%    |
| Alpha Offshore Drilling (Cambodia) Ltd.       | Cambodia               | 100%   |
| Alpha Offshore Drilling (S) Pte. Ltd.         | Singapore              | 100%   |
| Atwood Oceanics Services                      | Singapore              | 100%   |
| Atwood Oceanics Malta Ltd.                    | Malta                  | 100%   |
| Atwood Offshore Drilling Limited              | Hong Kong              | 100%   |
| Atwood Oceanics (NZ) Limited                  | New Zealand            | 100%   |
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed January 19, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-0860

Lower Tribunal No. 17-28717

________________

Miguel Pena Montes de Oca and Patricia Ojeda,

Appellants,

vs.

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos 

Guzman, Judge.

Alexander Appellate Law P.A., and Samuel Alexander (DeLand), for 

appellants.

Paul R. Pearcy, P.A., and Maureen G. Pearcy, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ. 

LINDSEY, J.
2

Appellants Miguel Pena Montes de Oca and Patricia Ojeda, the 

insured homeowners, appeal from a final judgment, following a jury trial, in 

favor of Appellee Citizens Property Insurance Corp. Based on the record 

before us, we find no reversible error and affirm. See Empire Pro 

Restoration, Inc. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 322 So. 3d 96, 98 (Fla. 4th 

DCA 2021) (“‘[A]n insured claiming under an all-risks policy has the burden 

of proving that the insured property suffered a loss while the policy was in 

effect. The burden then shifts to the insurer to prove that the cause of the 

loss was excluded from coverage under the policy’s terms.’ [Kokhan v. Auto 

Club Ins. Co. of Florida, 297 So. 3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020)] (alteration 

in original) (quoting Jones v. Federated Nat’l Ins. Co., 235 So. 3d 936, 941 

(Fla. 4th DCA 2018)). ‘If there is an exception to the exclusion, the burden 

once again is placed on the insured to demonstrate the exception to the 

exclusion.’ E. Florida Hauling, Inc. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 913 So. 2d 673, 678 

(Fla. 3d DCA 2005) . . . .”). Given the specific facts in this case, any alleged 

error with the jury instructions is harmless. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2021) 

(“No judgment shall be set aside or reversed, or new trial granted by any 

court of the state in any cause, civil or criminal, on the ground of misdirection 

of the jury . . . unless in the opinion of the court to which application is made, 

after an examination of the entire case it shall appear that the error 
3

complained of has resulted in a miscarriage of justice. This section shall be 

liberally construed.”). 

Affirmed.
----

----

|   |                                               |  /s/ Herbert M.      Stein                                                                                                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  Dated:  August      13, 2010  |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |  ___________________________________________                                                                                    |
|   |                                               |  Herbert M.      Stein                                                                                                          |
|   |                                               |  Chief      Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer)                                                       |
|   |                                               |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |  /s/ Paul J.      Murphy                                                                                                        |
|   |  Dated:  August      13, 2010  |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |  ___________________________________________                                                                                    |
|   |                                               |  Paul J.      Murphy                                                                                                            |
|   |                                               |  Chief      Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance (principal financial      officer and principal accounting officer) |
|   |                                               |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |                                                                                                                                 |
|   |                                               |                                                                                                                                 |

----

----
97-627.

#### State ex rel. Snitzky v. Suster.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.