alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Entergy Corporation as of December 31, 2006

Certain subsidiaries, which if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of December 31, 2006, have been omitted.

**Name of Company **State of Incorporation   
Entergy Corporation 
Delaware
   Entergy Arkansas, Inc. 
Arkansas
      System Fuels, Inc 
Louisiana
      The Arklahoma Corporation 
Arkansas
      Arkansas Power & Light Company 
Arkansas
   Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 
Texas
      Varibus LLC (Varibus) 
Texas
      Prudential Oil & Gas LLC 
Texas
      Southern Gulf Railway LLC 
Texas
      GSG&T Inc. 
Texas
      Gulf States Utility Company 
Texas
   Entergy Louisiana Holdings, Inc 
Texas
      Entergy Louisiana Properties, LLC 
Texas
         System Fuels, Inc 
Louisiana
      Entergy Louisiana, LLC 
Texas
         Louisiana Power & Light Company 
Louisiana
   Entergy Mississippi, Inc 
Mississippi
      System Fuels, Inc 
Louisiana
      Jackson Gas Light Company 
Mississippi
      Entergy Power & Light Company 
Mississippi
      The Light, Heat and Water Company of Jackson, Mississippi 
Mississippi
      Mississippi Power & Light Company 
Mississippi
   Entergy New Orleans, Inc. 
Louisiana
      System Fuels, Inc. 
Louisiana
      New Orleans Public Service, Inc 
Louisiana
   System Energy Resources, Inc 
Arkansas
      Entergy New Nuclear Utility Development, LLC 
Delaware
   Entergy Services, Inc. 
Delaware
   Entergy Operations, Inc 
Delaware
   EPI Holdings, Inc. 
Delaware
      Entergy Power, Inc. 
Delaware
   Entergy Enterprises, Inc. 
Arkansas
   Entergy Nuclear, Inc. 
New York
      TLG Services, Inc 
Connecticut
      Entergy Nuclear PFS Company 
Delaware
      Entergy Nuclear Potomac 
Delaware
      Nu Start Energy Development, LLC 
Delaware
   Entergy Nuclear Holding Company # 1 
Delaware
      Entergy Nuclear Generation Company 
Massachusetts
      Entergy Nuclear New York Investment Company I 
Delaware
         Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC 
Delaware
         Entergy Nuclear FitzPatrick, LLC 
Delaware
   Entergy Nuclear Holding Company # 2 
Delaware
      Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc 
Delaware
      Entergy Nuclear Fuels Company 
Mississippi
   Entergy Nuclear Holding Company 
Delaware
      Entergy Nuclear Holding Company # 3, 
Delaware
         Entergy Nuclear Investment Company, 
Delaware
            Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC 
Delaware
            Entergy Nuclear Nebraska, LLC 
Delaware

 

**Name of Company **State of Incorporation   
         Entergy Nuclear Vermont Investment Company, LLC 
Delaware
            Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC 
Delaware
   Entergy Nuclear Finance Holding, Inc 
Arkansas
      Entergy Nuclear Finance, LLC 
Delaware
   Entergy Global Trading Holdings, LTD 
Cayman Islands
      Entergy Power Generation, LLC 
Delaware
         Entergy Nuclear Power Marketing, LLC 
Delaware
** **********
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ("Quarterly Report") ofItronics Inc. (the "Registrant") for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of theundersigned, in their capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

 

Date: May 15, 2008                             /S/MICHAEL C. HORSLEY
                                                MichaelC. Horsley

                                                Controller

                                                (PrincipalAccounting Officer)

48
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Corey Gamble, Appellant.

Submitted March 26, 2012;

decided May 1, 2012

Motion for reargument denied *[see*18 NY3d 386 (2012)].
----

| Subsidiaries of the Registrant | Jurisdiction of Organization |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                           |                         |
| BCP Ingredients, Inc.          | Delaware                     |
|                           |                         |
| Balchem Minerals Corporation   | Delaware                     |
|                           |                         |
| Chelated Minerals Corporation  | Utah                         |
|                           |                         |
| BCP Saint Gabriel, Inc.        | Delaware                     |
|                           |                         |
| Balchem BV                     | Netherlands                  |
|                           |                         |
| Balchem Trading BV             | Netherlands                  |
|                           |                         |
| Balchem Italia Srl             | Italy                        |
|                           |                         |
| Balchem Ltd.                   | Canada                       |
|                           |                         |
| Aberco, Inc.                   | Maryland                     |

----
*Thursday, May 22, 1997*

MOTION DOCKET

97-728.

#### Cleveland Police Patrolmen’s Assn. v. Cleveland.

Cuyahoga App. No. 70380. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to vacate April 30, 1997 entry and strike motion for stay or, in the alternative, motion for sanctions,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs, but would grant seven days to respond and would then have this court reconsider the stay.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



                      AVEMCO Corporation and Subsidiaries
                        Statement Regarding Computation
                             Of per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE/1/                YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                             ------------------------
 
                                        1995           1994            1993   
                                     -----------    -----------     -----------
<S>                                  <C>            <C>             <C>       
     Net earnings                    $ 7,918,000    $10,833,000     $15,572,000
                                     ===========    ===========     ===========
                                                                              
     Average shares outstanding        8,845,857      9,019,322      11,041,447
                                     ===========    ===========     ===========
                                                                              
     Net earnings per share          $     .8951    $    1.2011     $    1.4103
                                     ===========    ===========     ===========
 
FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE/2/
 
     Net earnings                    $ 7,918,000    $10,833,000     $15,572,000
                                     ===========    ===========     ===========
                                                                              
     Average shares outstanding        8,845,857      9,019,322      11,041,447
                                     ===========    ===========     ===========
                                                                              
     Net earnings per share          $     .8951    $    1.2011     $    1.4103
                                     ===========    ===========     ===========
</TABLE>                                                        
                                                                
  /1/ Primary earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of
      common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the year.
      Outstanding common stock options are considered to be common stock
      equivalents (based upon the average market price of the Registrant's
      common stock) for the purpose of this calculation, when their impact is
      dilutive.

  /2/ Fully diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted average number
      of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the year.
      Outstanding common stock options are considered to be common stock
      equivalents (based upon the higher of the ending market price or the
      average market price of the Registrant's common stock) for the purpose of
      this calculation, when their impact is dilutive.

                                      69
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA FROM OUR CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND OUR CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>     1
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         159,953
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               710,314
<PP&E>                                         190,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 847,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          518,699
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,825
<OTHER-SE>                                     256,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   847,966
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,177,363
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,147,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,147,899)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,147,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,147,899)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)


</TABLE>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

N O . A P - 7 6 , 6 2 1

E X P A R T E T R A C Y J . H O W A R D , A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R A W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O . 1 9 1 5 1 I N T H E 3 5 6 D I S T R I C T C O U R T T H F R O M H A R D I N C O U N T Y

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.0 7 o f t h e T exas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applica n t was convicted of possession of marijuana , over 50 pounds, and s en t en ced to twenty y ear s’ imprisonment. The Ninth Court of Appeal s af

fi rm ed his conviction. Howard v. State , No. 09-09-00203- CR (Tex. App.–B eaumont, May 12, 2010). A p p li cant contends that his appellate counsel rende red ineffe ctive assis ta n c e b e c a u s e c o u n s e l failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been aff irmed. Couns el s u b m i t ted a2

response stating that he ti mely mailed a let t er to Applicant informing him that his conviction was aff irmed and that he had a rig ht to file a pro se petition for discretionar y revie w. Applicant alleg es that during the applicable t i m e fr ame, the mail room at his fac ility did not rec eive any mail from counsel addre ssed to Applicant. We rema nded this application to the trial court t o d et er m ine whether Applicant re ceive d the letter f rom counsel. T h e a p p licable mail logs from the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice have been su b mi tt e d
to the trial court. Ba sed on those logs, the trial court has enter ed finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that Applicant did not rec eive the le tter fr om appellate c ounsel. Applicant is entitled to relief based not on ineffe ctive assistance of counsel, but r ather on a brea k-down in the sy stem. Ex parte Riley , 193 S.W .3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We find that Applicant is entitled to the oppo rt u n i t y t o file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the Ninth Court of Appea ls in Cause No. 09-09-00203- CR that aff irmed his co n v iction in Case No. 19151 from the 356 J udicial District Court of Har din t h County

. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionar y revie w with this Court within 30 day s of the date on w hich this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: September

14, 2011 Do not publish
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE Justice 

# Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449 www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

July 6, 2015

Danny Shead
TDCJ-ID#01484832

Tulia Transfer Facility

400 Hwy 86 West Tulia, TX 79088 Warren L. Clark

Asst. Criminal District Attorney

Randall County Justice Center

2309 Russell Long Blvd., Suite 120 Canyon, TX 79015

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07-15-00164-CV, 07-15-00165-CV, 07-15-00166-CV

Trial Court Case Number: 8460B, 8461B, 19154B

Style: Danny Shead v. The State of Texas

Dear Mr. Shead and Counsel: F

Appellee's brief is filed on Wednesday, July 01, 2015.

Very truly yours, 

# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
Sole Proprietary Interest

Regulation – Discussion Draft

Page 1 of 2

01/18/2018 Version

Sole Proprietary Interest – draft regulation

Add to Compliance regulations, Part 573:

a) In determining whether the sole proprietary interest mandate has been violated, the Chair may

take any of the following factors, including only a single factor, into consideration:

1. whether the Tribe received the primary benefit of its gaming revenue;

2. the amount of revenue paid or given to the third party or kept by it;

3. whether the third party received or was entitled to the gaming revenue for no return, 

service, or asset provided to the gaming operation;

4. whether the amount of revenue given to an approved or unapproved management 

contractor or kept by it exceeds the statutory cap set forth in IGRA for management 

contractors;

5. the right of control provided to the third party or exercised by it, including, but not 

limited to:

a. whether the Tribe was excluded from the premises of the gaming operation or 

part thereof;

b. whether the third party operated the gaming operation or part thereof as the 

proprietor;

c. whether the third party possesses the right to seek a judicial appointment of a 

receiver over the gaming operation;

d. whether the Tribe and third party created a joint venture; and

e. whether a third party, third parties, or individuals possess stock ownership in a 

gaming operation.;

6. the term of the relationship between the Tribe and the third party, including, but not 

limited to, the cost or difficulty in terminating the relationship;

7. the provision or assignment of Tribal rights to the third party, including, but not 

limited to:
Sole Proprietary Interest

Regulation – Discussion Draft

Page 2 of 2

01/18/2018 Version

a. the third party’s right to access to records or financial information regarding 

the gaming operation or part thereof;

b. the right to place gambling devices that are controlled by a third party in the 

gaming operation or part thereof; and

c. the grant of a security interest in the gaming operation.

b) The Chair has discretion to take other factors not listed in (a) into consideration for 

purposes of determining whether the sole proprietary interest mandate has been violated. 

c) Any enforcement action for a sole proprietary interest violation must specify the factors 

relied on and the reasons for relying on them.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 13A-14(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Peak  Entertainment  Holdings,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date therein specified
(the "Report"), the undersigned,  Nicola Yeomans, as Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Nicola Yeomans
---------------------------
Nicola Yeomans
Principal Financial Officer
Date:  August 26, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND
PAGES 3, 4, 5 AND 6 FO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997 AND ITS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          48,159
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    734,518
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,030,275
<PP&E>                                       3,616,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                 411,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,418,441
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,349,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       120,412
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,863,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,418,441
<SALES>                                        366,903
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               366,903
<CGS>                                          379,120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  675,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,514
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (709,867)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (709,867)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        

</TABLE>
October 10, 1997 

Mr. Lawerence F. Snake 

President 

Delaware Tribe of Western Oklahoma 

P.O. Box 825 

Anadarko, Oklahoma 73005 

Dear President Snake: 

I am writing on behalf of the National Indian Gaming Commission (MGC) to commend the 

recent decision of the Delaware Tribe of Western Oklahoma (Tribe) to cease operation of the 

Cyberdyne Video Pull Tab machines which had previously been located in its gaming facility in . 

Anadarko, Oklahoma. 

As you were recently advised, the NIGC examined these machines and has determined that the 

Cyberdyne Video Pull Tab Dispensers are a form of Class 111 gaming. The MGC notes that there 

YII~-I' is no tribal-state compact between the Tribe and the State of Oklahoma which authorizes the Tribe 

to operate Class III gaming machines. Accordingly, the continued operation of the Cyberdyne Video 

Pull Tab Dispensers would have made it necessary for the NIGC to initiate enforcement proceedings 

to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and NIGC 

regulations. 

The Tribe's decision to voluntarily cease operation of the Cyberdyne machines has made it 

unnecessary to take such a step. This decision reflects the Tribe's commitment to conduct its gaming 

activities on a lahl basis. Such a commitment will contribute to the long terns success of the 

Tribe's gaming operation and is credit to the good judgement of its leaders. 

chairman 

Uh /i'!l L- ,, 

- . 

-. -- -. !.U1 L STSEs. N.'N 9Tk rl_CCP \NASilNGTCPI 7 C 2CCO5 ?E- 252-;22-7503 FIX 2')2-332.7g60 -. .. - . - - - - --- - -
Exhibit
32.1





Section
1350


CERTIFICATION








The
undersigned officer hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, (1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of COMFORCE Corporation for the year ended December
30, 2007 as to which this Certification is an exhibit fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in such Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of COMFORCE Corporation.





Signed
March 20, 2008.





/s/
      John C. FanningJohn
      C. Fanning,Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
96-2190.

#### Cleveland v. Trzebuckowski.

Cuyahoga App. No. 69478. Reported at 77 Ohio St.3d 1515, 674 N.E.2d 370. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted; *sua sponte,*discretionary appeal allowed.

F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., dissent.