alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Gary Kouletas, certify that:
 
 1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report of Form 10-Q of Hybred International, Inc.
 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.
 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 4.
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:
 
 a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to me by others within the company, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and
 
 b)           Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and
 
 c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based upon such evaluation; and
 
 d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5.
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the  registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);
 
 a)       All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.
  
 Date: October 5, 2011
   /s/ Gary Kouletas
 Gary Kouletas
 President (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Applied Minerals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Andre Zeitoun, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:   October 7 , 2011
By:
/s/  ANDRE ZEITOUNAndre ZeitounChief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mitchel D.G., Appellant, v Interfaith Medical Center et al., Respondents.

Submitted May 13, 2013;

decided June 4, 2013

Motion for sanctions and other relief denied.
[J-43-2015] [MO: Wecht, J.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Appellee**

**v.**

**WILLIAM A. JOHNSON,**

**Appellant :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 701 CAP** 

**Appeal from the Order entered on July**
**10, 2014 in the Court of Common Pleas, of Philadelphia County, Criminal** 

**Division at No. CP-51-CR-0936052-**

**1991**

**SUBMITTED: July 1, 2015**

CONCURRING OPINION

JUSTICE TODD DECIDED: June 20, 2016

**I join the Majority Opinion, except for its handling of Appellant’s Kloiber**  **1 issue in** 

**Part IV(D). On that issue, I join the analysis of Chi ef Justice Saylor in his Concurring** 

**Opinion.**

**Justice Donohue joins this concurring opinion.**

**1 Commonwealth v. Kloiber, 106 A.2d 820 (Pa. 1954).**
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the quarterly  report of Dominix,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ending  March  31,  2004 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on May ___, 2004 (the "Report"),  I, Raymond
Barton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ Raymond Barton
---------------------------
Raymond Barton
Chief Executive Officer

May ___, 2004

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1768

LESTER MOODY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. BALTIMORE CITY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES STATE OF MARYLAND , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Ellen L. Hollander , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv - 00488

- ELH )

Submitted : October 18, 2018 Decided: October 22, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KEENAN , Circuit Judge , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Lester Moody, Appellant Pro Se. Elise Song Kurlander, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lester Moody appeals the district court’s order granting the Baltimore City Department of Social Services’ motion to dismiss Moody’s civil complaint, which asserted claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civ il Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 (West 2012 & Supp. 201 8 ) ; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 to 1688 (2012); and the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act, Md. Code Ann., State Gov’t § 20

- 606(a)(1)(i) ( West 2014)

. We have review ed the record and consider ed the parties’ arguments . Finding no reversible error , we affirm the district court ’s order. See Moody v. Baltimore City Dep’t of Soc. Servs. , No. 1:18

- cv 00488

- ELH (D. Md

. June 25, 2018 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 2-72576) pertaining to the 1981 Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-34107) pertaining to the Baldwin & Lyons, Inc.
Deferred Directors Fee Option Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-31316) pertaining to the Baldwin & Lyons, Inc. Employee Discounted Stock
Option Plan of our reports dated March 4, 2005, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedules of Baldwin & Lyons, Inc., Baldwin & Lyons,
Inc. management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of the Baldwin & Lyons, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form
10K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.



                                                          /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Indianapolis, Indiana
March 10, 2005
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

AND

CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Richard J. Heckmann, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of K2 Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 of K2 Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of K2 Inc.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                            |  |                                     
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    RICHARD J.
HECKMANN
|Date: June 16, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  | Richard J. Heckmann       
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                            |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



I, John J. Rangel,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of K2 Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 of K2 Inc. for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of K2 Inc.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                |  |                                                  
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                |  | /s/    JOHN J.
RANGEL                            
|Date: June 16, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  | John J. Rangel
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John R. Judd, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of ATS Medical, Inc.;
     and

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report.

Date: July 17, 2006


/s/ John R. Judd
----------------------------------------
Name: John R. Judd
Title: Chief Financial Officer
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-6566, styled State of Texas v. Jason Miears, in the 379th

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding. 

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00713-CR

IN RE Jason MIEARS

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 11, 2009 

PETITION DENIED

On November 2, 2009, relator Jason Miears filed a petition entitled “Petition for Writ of Quo

Warranto” in which he complains his appointed counsel has failed to provide him copies of

discovery received by his counsel from the State. He asks this court to issue a writ to force his

appointed counsel to furnish him with copies of all discovery. 

A writ of quo warranto is an extraordinary remedy used to determine disputed questions

about the proper person entitled to hold a public office and exercise its functions, or to question the

existence of a public corporation or district and its right to act. State ex rel. Angelini v. Hardberger,
04-09-00713-CR

-2-

932 S.W.2d 489, 490 (Tex. 1996) (citing State ex. rel Jennett v. Owens, 63 Tex. 261, 270 (1885))

(person holding public office); Save Our Springs Alliance, Inc. v. Lazy Nine Mun. Util. Dist. ex rel

Bd. of Directors, 198 S.W.3d 300, 310 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2006, pet. denied) (special-law

municipal utility water district). Relator’s petition is wholly unrelated to the issues for which a writ

of quo warranto is available, and therefore is an improper vehicle for obtaining the relief sought by

relator.

Even if we interpret relator’s petition as a petition for writ of mandamus, he is still not

entitled to relief. This court’s writ power is limited to issuance of writs necessary to enforce our

jurisdiction, writs of habeas corpus in civil cases, and writs of mandamus against a (1) judge of a

district or county court in our district, (2) judge of a district court acting as a magistrate at a court

of inquiry in our district. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004). Relator’s request

has no relationship to our jurisdiction, arises out of a criminal case, and is directed against his

appointed counsel, not a judge as described in that statute. 

Based on the foregoing, we deny relator’s petition. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                                   AUGAT INC.
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
 
<TABLE>
     The subsidiaries listed below have been included in the consolidated
financial statements filed herewith.
 
<CAPTION>
                                                                    JURISDICTION OF     PERCENTAGE
                  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT                     INCORPORATION        OWNED
------------------------------------------------------------------  ---------------     ----------
<S>                                                                 <C>                     <C>
Augat Components GmbH.............................................  Germany                 100
Augat AB..........................................................  Sweden                  100
Augat AG..........................................................  Switzerland             100
Augat Communication Products Inc..................................  Washington              100
Augat Canada Inc..................................................  Canada                  100
Augat International Ltd...........................................  Virgin Islands          100
Augat KK..........................................................  Japan                   100
Augat Limited.....................................................  England                 100
Augat PTE Limited.................................................  Singapore               100
Augat Pty Limited.................................................  Australia               100
Augat Realty Inc..................................................  Massachusetts           100
Augat SA..........................................................  France                  100
Augat SA de CV....................................................  Mexico                  100
Augat SRL.........................................................  Italy                   100
Augat Wiring Systems Inc..........................................  Alabama                 100
AUG-ISO Inc.......................................................  New Jersey              100
Augat Manufacturing SA............................................  Switzerland             100
LRC Electronics, Inc..............................................  New York                100
Reliable Electronic Finishing Company, Inc........................  Massachusetts           100
Augat Photon Systems Inc..........................................  Canada                  100
Elastomeric Technologies Inc......................................  Pennsylvania            100
</TABLE>
 
                                       39
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14160]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocation

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 
409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515, effective on 
the corresponding date shown below:
    License Number: 020488N.
    Name: Cycle Logical Supply Chain Solutions, LLC.
    Address: 8014 Cumming Hwy., Ste 403-362, Canton, GA 30115.
    Date Revoked: May 17, 2009.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. E9-14160 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
97-604.

#### Walter v. State.

In Habeas Corpus. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.4


 



THE COMPANY’S UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET DATED MARCH 31, 2013


 



	  	 	
March 31, 2013


(Unaudited)

	 
	
ASSETS

	 	 	 
	
Current assets:

	 	 	 
	
Cash

	 	$	242,000	 
	
Accounts receivable, net of $8,000 allowance for doubtful accounts at March 31, 2013 


and September 30, 2012

	 	 	286,000	 
	
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts

	 	 	91,000	 
	
Inventories

	 	 	358,000	 
	
Prepaid expenses and other current assets

	 	 	198,000	 
	
Total current assets

	 	 	1,175,000	 
	
Property and equipment, net

	 	 	867,000	 
	
Patents and trademarks, net

	 	 	187,000	 
	
Goodwill

	 	 	2,131,000	 
	
Other assets

	 	 	557,000	 
	
Total assets

	 	$	4,917,000	 
	
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

	 	 	 	 
	
Liabilities not subject to compromise:

	 	 	 	 
	
      Current liabilities:

	 	 	 	 
	
Accounts payable

	 	$	252,000	 
	
Accrued liabilities

	 	 	585,000	 
	
Customer deposits

	 	 	23,000	 
	
Billing in excess of costs and estimated earnings

	 	 	56,000	 
	
Notes payable, related party

	 	 	450,000	 
	
     Total current liabilities

	 	 	1,366,000	 
	
Other

	 	 	47,000	 
	
Total liabilities not subject to compromise

	 	 	1,413,000	 
	
Liabilities subject to compromise

	 	 	49,196,000	 
	
Total liabilities

	 	 	50,609,000	 
	
Commitments and contingencies

	 	 	—	 
	
Stockholders’ deficit:

	 	 	 	 
	
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and 


outstanding

	 	 	—	 
	
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 146,510,818 and 


146,436,893 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and September 30, 2012

	 	 	1,465,000	 
	
Additional paid-in capital

	 	 	131,396,000	 
	
Accumulated deficit

	 	 	(178,553,000	)
	
Total stockholders’ deficit

	 	 	(45,692,000	)
	
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit

	 	$	4,917,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                             746
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5933
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8988
<PP&E>                                            4341
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    9738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8353
<BONDS>                                           4629
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       5700
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                      (8996)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      9738
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7969
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3062
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    276
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                276
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       276
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>