alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 6/27/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2019 ND 150

Michael Aaron Schatz, Appellant

v.

North Dakota Department of Transportation, Appellee

No. 20190068

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial

District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Danny L. Herbel, Bismarck, ND, for appellant; submitted on brief.

Michael T. Pitcher, Office of Attorney General, Bismarck, ND, for appellee;

submitted on brief.
Schatz v. N.D. Dep’t of Transportation

No. 20190068

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Michael Schatz appeals from a district court judgment affirming a North

Dakota Department of Transportation (“DOT”) decision suspending his driving

privileges. On August 25, 2018, Schatz was pulled over by an officer with the

Bismarck Police Department and arrested for driving under the influence. Schatz was

issued a temporary operator’s permit, and the officer’s “Report and Notice Form” was

forwarded to the DOT. Schatz requested an administrative hearing. Following the

hearing, the hearing officer issued findings of fact, conclusions of law, and decision

suspending Schatz’s driving privileges for 91 days. Schatz argues the Report and

Notice form did not sufficiently articulate reasonable grounds to believe Schatz was

driving under the influence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

See Sutton v. N.D. Dep’t of Transp., 2019 ND 132, ¶ 8, 927 N.W.2d 93.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      This Schedule contains summary financial info-
                              mation extracted from financial statements for
                              the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1997 and is
                              qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                              financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         823314
<NAME>                        Advanced Financial, Inc.
<CURRENCY>                    United States

       


<S>                                                   <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                        APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                 1
<CASH>                                                     22,732 
<SECURITIES>                                                    0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                             190,235 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0 
<INVENTORY>                                                     0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          243,839 
<PP&E>                                                  1,093,214 
<DEPRECIATION>                                             36,926 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          1,337,059 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   4,611,917 
<BONDS>                                                         0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0 
<PREFERRED>                                                 1,815 
<COMMON>                                                    5,836 
<OTHER-SE>                                             (2,841,164)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            1,337,059 
<SALES>                                                         0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           127,128 
<CGS>                                                           0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             386,559 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           38,752 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         54,855 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (259,431)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0 
<CHANGES>                                                       0 
<NET-INCOME>                                             (259,431)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.05)
        



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Docket ID: DOD-2009-OS-0081]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice to delete a System of Records.

# SUMMARY:

The Office of the Secretary of Defense is deleting NSLRB 01 system of records notice in its existing inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

# DATES:

This proposed action will be effective without further notice on July 16, 2009 unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to the Privacy Act Officer, Office of Freedom of Information, Washington Headquarters Services, 1155 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mrs. Cindy Allard at (703) 588-6830.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Office of the Secretary of Defense systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                

The Office of the Secretary of Defense proposes to delete one system of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system report.

Dated: June 4, 2009.

Morgan E. Frazier,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

### Deletion:

## NSLRB 01

The National Security Labor Relations Board (NSLRB) (February 22, 2006, 71 FR 9102).

### Reason:

The Office of the Secretary of Defense never implemented this portion of the National Security Personnel System (NSPS) and no collection of records was ever made.

[FR Doc. E9-14092 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### Office of Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Clark.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Clark*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 302.]

(No. 96-1968

Submitted January 22, 1997

Decided April 30, 1997.)

*303
      *Geoffrey Stem,*Disciplinary Counsel, and *Sally Ann Steuk,*Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

*Dexter W. Clark, pro se,*and *Steven Fitten,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We have reviewed the record and accept the findings and conclusions of the board. Neglect of an entrusted legal matter warrants the sanction of suspension. *Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Droe*(1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 89, 671 N.E.2d 230. In view of the repetitive nature of respondent’s violations, we hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years, with one year of the suspension stayed and respondent placed on probation for that one-year period. As conditions of probation, respondent is to enter into a contract with OLAP or a similar monitoring agency, attend counseling and support-group meetings regularly, maintain regular contact with a legal mentor, remain alcohol-free, and attend legal-office management courses for a minimum of twelve hours, as a part of his Continuing Legal Education requirement. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,749
<SECURITIES>                                     1,620
<RECEIVABLES>                                      762
<ALLOWANCES>                                        79
<INVENTORY>                                        166
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,389
<PP&E>                                           9,422
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,012
<BONDS>                                         12,801
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,775
<PREFERRED>                                        291
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,292
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,339
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   583
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (536)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (16)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (520)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (104)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (624)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.97)


</TABLE>
**
**Exhibit No. 23.2**

Consent of Independent Auditors 

TheBoard of Directors 

Worthington Armstrong Venture: 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-138034,333-154765,333-177072 and 333-212457) on Form S-8 and in the registration statements (No. 333-224533) on Form S-3 ofArmstrong World Industries, Inc. of our report dated February 18, 2019, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Worthington Armstrong Venture and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidatedstatements of income and comprehensive income, partners’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes, which report appears in the December 31, 2018 annualreport on Form 10-K of Armstrong World Industries, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

February 25, 2019 
**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          20,687
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                15,125
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          20,852
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            20,852
<LOANS>                                        199,510
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 262,201
<DEPOSITS>                                     234,801
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,849
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,041
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 262,201
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,317
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  734
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   225
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,907
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,231
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,676
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      914
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,679
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,679
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,649
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0.068
<LOANS-NON>                                        915
<LOANS-PAST>                                       455
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,021
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,500
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      303
<RECOVERIES>                                       161
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,860
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,860
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            301


</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3409 

To make certain adjustments to the price analysis of propane prepared 

by the Secretary of Commerce. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2010 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To make certain adjustments to the price analysis of propane 

prepared by the Secretary of Commerce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. 

4 Section 9(a) of the Propane Education and Research 

5 Act of 1996 (15 U.S.C. 6408(a)) is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘price of consumer grade propane to a composite’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘average price of consumer grade propane to all 

8 end users to an equally weighted composite’’. 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3409 IS

1 SEC. 2. UPDATED PRICE ANALYSIS. 

2 Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment 

3 of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce shall prepare and 

4 make available to the public a propane price analysis re5 flecting the amendment made by section 1. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4.2



Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated August 12, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2124 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-265034) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in
the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


August 12, 2022
#### Sharron L. O’Buckley, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Michael O’Buckley, Deceased, Appellant, v County of Chemung, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[977 NYS2d 477]

Rose, J.E

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (O’Shea, J.), entered June 7, 2012 in Chemung County, which, upon remittal, denied plaintiffs cross motion to impose an appropriate discovery sanction against defendant County of Chemung.

In our prior decision in this matter (88 AD3d 1140 [2011]), we reversed that part of an order of Supreme Court granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. In addition, we remitted the matter for consideration of the merits of plaintiffs cross motion for sanctions against defendant County of Chemung pursuant to CPLR 3126 based upon the County’s alleged failure to respond to discovery demands *(id.*at 1141-1142). *1191On remittal, Supreme Court denied plaintiffs cross motion for sanctions, concluding that the County had complied with plaintiffs discovery demands to the extent that the requested records were within the County’s possession, custody or control. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.

It is well settled that a trial court has broad discretionary power to control discovery and disclosure, and only a clear abuse of discretion will cause us to disturb its determination *(see Hameroff & Sons, LLC v Plank, LLC,*108 AD3d 908, 909 [2013]; *Matter of Scaccia,*66 AD3d 1247, 1249 [2009]; *Jessmer v Martin,*46 AD3d 1059, 1060 [2007]). Here, the County provided responses — and supplemental responses — to plaintiff’s demands. Although plaintiff maintains that certain documents not produced must necessarily exist, the County denies their existence and has repeatedly explained that it does not have possession, custody or control of the documents sought. Plaintiff claims that records should exist regarding stream repair work, snow removal and oiling and stoning performed on the road in question, as well as records regarding the installation of signs on the road. The County established that it produced its entire road history file that included all the records it had related to the road, including stream repair records. According to the County, it only has snow removal records that reflect the time spent performing such work generally, without reference to specific roads. The County also indicated that it did not have any records regarding oiling and stoning the road and that the records regarding when signs were installed did not exist. Inasmuch as there is no evidence that the documents that plaintiff seeks actually exist and that the County has access to them but has improperly withheld them, plaintiff has failed to show a clear abuse of discretion here *(see Mary Imogene Bassett Hosp. v Cannon Design, Inc.,*97 AD3d 1030, 1032 [2012]; *Matter of Scaccia,*66 AD3d at 1249-1250; *cf. Hameroff & Sons, LLC v Plank, LLC,*108 AD3d at 909; *Rossi v Budget Rent A Car/Budget Car & Truck Rental,*49 AD3d 1088, 1089 [2008], *lv denied*11 NY3d 709 [2008]).

Spain, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
EXHIBIT 23.0


                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
 of Armatron International, Inc.:

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements on Form S-3 (SEC File no. 2-80846 and SEC File No. 2-80950) and in 
the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 2-80846) of Armatron 
International, Inc. of our reports dated December 9, 1996, on our audit of 
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of 
Armatron International, Inc. as of September 30, 1996 and 1995, and for the 
years ended September 30, 1996 and 1995, which report is incorporated by 
reference or included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Needham, Massachusetts
December 20, 1996                            R. J. GOLD & COMPANY P.C.
97-137.

#### Buckeye Community Hope Found. v. Cuyahoga Falls.

Cuyahoga App. No. 17933.

Cook, J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) LEGEND
PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 1999 AND 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
JUNE 30, 1999 QUARTERLY REPORT FILED ON FORM 10-Q AND 1998 ANNUAL REPORT FILED
ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      13,264,365
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,617,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 78,727,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      31,008,670
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,346,117
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             132,861,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     29,969,584
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           63,117
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,938,628)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               132,861,141
<SALES>                                     24,850,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,661,176
<CGS>                                       18,102,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,203,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,947,458
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,271,253
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,489,683)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,489,683)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,489,683)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.19)


</TABLE>
#### The State ex rel. Whitmer, Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio; Anchor Tool & Die Company, Appellant.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Whitmer v. Indus. Comm.*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 412.]

(No. 95-490

Submitted April 16, 1997

Decided May 14, 1997.)

*413*Berger & Kirschenbaum Co., L.P.A.,*and *Linda U. Elliott,*for appellee.

*Stevens & Mack*and *David E. Mack,*for appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

On authority of *State ex rel. Newman v. Indus. Comm.*(1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 271, 673 N.E.2d 1301, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.