alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30,
1997 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         538,783
<SECURITIES>                                    72,712
<RECEIVABLES>                                  192,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,199
<INVENTORY>                                     69,649
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               894,393
<PP&E>                                       2,654,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                 411,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,828,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          424,621
<BONDS>                                      4,336,264
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    300,000
<COMMON>                                           244
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,272,340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,828,824
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               256,614
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               224,704
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             172,456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (568,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (85,930)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (482,473)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (482,473)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.01)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3354 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3354

To redesignate the North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges Complex 
  as the Sam D. Hamilton North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges 
                                Complex.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 2010

  Mr. Cochran introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges Complex 
  as the Sam D. Hamilton North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges 
                                Complex.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE NORTH MISSISSIPPI NATIONAL WILDLIFE 
              REFUGES COMPLEX.

    (a) In General.--The North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges 
Complex, located in the State of Mississippi and consisting of the 
Dahomey National Wildlife Refuge, the Tallahatchie National Wildlife 
Refuge, the Coldwater National Wildlife Refuge, and the Bear Lake Unit, 
is redesignated as the ``Sam D. Hamilton North Mississippi National 
Wildlife Refuges Complex.''
    (b) Boundary Revision.--Nothing in this Act prevents the Secretary 
of the Interior from making adjustments to the boundaries of the Sam D. 
Hamilton North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges Complex (referred 
to in this section as the ``Refuges Complex''), as the Secretary 
determines to be appropriate, to carry out the mission of the National 
Wildlife Refuge System in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge 
System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.) and any 
other applicable authority.
    (c) Addition of Land.--Nothing in this Act prevents the Secretary 
of the Interior from adding to the Refuges Complex new land or parcels 
of the National Wildlife Refuge System, as the Secretary determines to 
be appropriate, to carry out the mission of the National Wildlife 
Refuge System in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge System 
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.) and any other 
applicable authority.
    (d) References.--Any reference in any statute, rule, regulation, 
executive order, publication, map, paper, or other document of the 
United States to the North Mississippi National Wildlife Refuges 
Complex is deemed to refer to the Sam D. Hamilton North Mississippi 
National Wildlife Refuges Complex.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ARAMARK Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Neubauer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JOSEPH
NEUBAUERJoseph Neubauer
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

c/o Hon. Abel Acosta, Clerk

P.O. BOX 12308

Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711

January 30; 2015

RE: Hamilton, Walter Aaron

CCA NO. WR-80,458-01

Trial Court Case No. 2006-CR-3927-W1

%)MS8-o\

Dear Honorable Acosta,

In your response dated October 22, 2014 you stated that the status of my

application for writ of habeas corpus was still pending a decision by the Court.

It is now three months later and I am simply inquiring as to the status of

my application again to show due diligence. Is my application still pending a

decision by the Court at this time?

Thank you so much for your help and understanding in this matter.

Sincerely,

Walter Aaron Hamilton, Pro-se

TDCJ-CID #1493992

ELLIS UNIT

1697 FM 980

HUNTSVILLEV.; TEXAS' 77343

c.c file

RECEIVED IN

ypamm

-EI04
##### 



EXHIBIT 14

|                     |   |                              |   |     |  |  |                | 
|-------------------- | - | ---------------------------- | - | --- |  |  | -------------- | 
|(ERNST & YOUNG LOGO) | § | The Ernst & Young Building   | § | Tel |  |  | 61 2 9248 5555 | 
|                     |   | 321 Kent Street              |   | Fax |  |  | 61 2 9262 6565 | 
|                     |   | Sydney NSW 2000              |   | DX  |  |  | Sydeny Stock   | 
|                     |   | Australia                    |   |     |  |  | Exchange 10172 | 
|                     |   |                              |   |     |  |  |                | 
|                     |   | GPO Box 2646
Sydney NSW 2001 |   |     |  |  |                | 

The Board of Directors
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
48 Martin Place
SYDNEY NSW 2000

Dear Directors

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Registration Statement on Form F-3
filed pursuant to Rule 415, relating to the issuance of debt securities of
Commonwealth Bank of Australia (the Bank) of our report dated August 20,
2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Bank and its
subsidiary companies appearing in the Banks Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 (which is incorporated by reference in such
Registration Statement to which this consent appears as Exhibit 10), and to the
use of our name in the Registration Statement under the heading Experts.

(-s- Ernst & Young)

Ernst & Young
Chartered Accountants

Sydney
Dated: 20 November 2003
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-56866, 333-90063, 333-90057 and 333-97567 of Atlantic American Corporation on
Form S-8 of our report dated March 26, 2004 relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Atlantic American Corporation as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes explanatory paragraphs relating to (1) the Company's change in its
method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets to conform with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 and (2) the application of
procedures relating to certain disclosures of financial statement amounts
related to the 2001 consolidated financial statements that were audited by other
auditors who have ceased operations and for which we have expressed no opinion
or other form of assurance other than with respect to such disclosures)
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Atlantic American Corporation
for the year ended December 31, 2003.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 26, 2004
#### McCrary *v.*The Pennsylvania Canal Co.*

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.*

October 28, 1880.)

1. Patent—Ru-rs;1,tie—Immaterial Variation from Devices in Original Patent.—An immaterial difference between a re-issue and the original patent, wliicb does not affect the mode of operation, the manner of construction, or the function performed, will not invalidate the re-issue.

2. Same—Refusal of Injunction where Great Injury would Result to Defendant.—Where the allowance of an injunction would cause much greater injury to respondent than benefit to complainant, the decree will be only for an account.

*368This was a hill in equity complaining of the infringement of re-issued letters patent No. 5,630, for an improvement in coupling and steering canal-boats. The respondent denied the novelty of the invention, and alleged also that the re-issue was for a different invention from that described in the original invention. The ease was heard on bill, answer, and proofs.

*J. J. Combs,*for complainant.

*Henry Baldwin, Jr.,*for respondent.

*

Reported by Frank P. Prichard, Esq., of the Philadelphia bar.

Per Curiam.

The bill here is founded upon a re-issued patent to the complainant for “improvement in coupling and steering canal-boats.”

This re-issue is alleged to be invalid, as being for a different invention from that described in the original patent. The difference between the two patents consists in a slight change in the points of attachment of the coupling and centering chain, D, to the stem of the forward boat, which appears Only in the drawing attached to the re-issue. It is altogether immaterial, inasmuch as the mode of operation, the manner of construction, or the function performed are not in anywise affected.

The remaining defences do not require a detailed discussion. It must suffice to say that they are not sustained.

The allegation of infringement is supported by satisfactory evidence, which the respondent’s proofs have not overthrown, and none of the prior patents exhibited cover the complainant’s invention.

There must, therefore, be a decree for the complainant; but, inasmuch as the allowance of an injunction would cause much greater injury to the respondent than benefit to the complainant, the decree will be only for an account.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Apogee Technology, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Herbert M. Stein, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly represents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: November 14, 2006 |   | /s/ Herbert M. Stein               |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                     |   | Herbert M. Stein                   |   |   |
|                     |   | Chairman of the Board,             |   |   |
|                     |   | President, Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
|                     |   | (principal executive officer)      |   |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoingcertification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission asour exhibit to the Form 10-QSB and shall not be deemed to be considered filedas part of the Form 10-QSB.

----
<PAGE>   1

                             TUSCARORA INCORPORATED
            EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Three Months Ended                  Six Months Ended
                                                 February 28,        February 28,      February 28,      February 28,
                                                     1998               1997               1998              1997
                                                   ------------      -----------        -----------       ----------

<S>                                                  <C>                <C>               <C>               <C>  
Weighted average number of shares
     of Common Stock outstanding                     9,482              9,449             9,446             9,437
Net effect of dilutive stock options -
     based on the treasury stock method
     using the average market price for
     the period                                         --                208               196               171
                                                   -------             ------            ------            ------

               TOTAL                                 9,482              9,657             9,642             9,608
                                                   =======             ======            ======            ======

Net income                                         $  (889)            $2,074            $2,883            $5,765
                                                   =======             ======            ======            ======

Per share amount                                   $  (.09)            $  .21            $  .30            $  .60
                                                   =======             ======            ======            ======
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,162,708
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         138,829
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               282,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                13,789
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    897,436
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,198,762
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,103,247
<LOANS>                                     21,633,960
<ALLOWANCE>                                    510,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,056,753
<DEPOSITS>                                  21,386,306
<SHORT-TERM>                                 6,454,538
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            378,974
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,333,092
<COMMON>                                         1,293
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    303,185
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,199,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              33,056,753
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,340,311
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              424,392
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                28,567
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,793,270
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             500,451
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             992,735
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          800,535
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,257
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                736,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                377,721
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     236,656
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   236,656
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.44
<LOANS-NON>                                    187,462
<LOANS-PAST>                                    42,831
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                22,213
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               542,116
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  120,344
<RECOVERIES>                                    35,442
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              510,569
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           510,569
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

<PAGE> 


</TABLE>
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

97-329.

#### GTE N., Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 95-790-TP-COI. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

*1434ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Exhibit 32



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, the undersigned officers of Astronics
Corporation (the Company) hereby certify that:

The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                               
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 16, 2014 |  |  |  | /s/
Peter J. Gundermann       
|                    |  |  |  | Peter J. Gundermann           
|                    |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 16, 2014 |  |  |  | /s/ David C.
Burney           
|                    |  |  |  | David C. Burney               
|                    |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent specifically incorporated by the Company into such filing.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

April 28, 2015

Hon. J. Rolando Olvera Jr.

Presiding Judge, 5th Administrative 

Judicial Region

200 N. Almond St.

Alice, TX 78332

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. J. R. 'Bobby' Flores

139th District Court

Hidalgo County Courthouse

100 N. Closner

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Laura Hinojosa

District Clerk

100 N Closner - 1st Floor

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Carlos E. Hernandez Jr.

Attorney at Law

200 E. Cano Street

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Tiffany Cox

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & 

Stewart

2700 Weston Centre

1200 E. Pecan Street

San Antonio, TX 78205-1551

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Lawrence D. Smith

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & 

Stewart

2700 Weston Centre

1220 East Pecan Street

San Antonio, TX 78205

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-15-00160-CV

Tr.Ct.No. C-6316-13-C

Style: In re Brenntag Southwest, Inc.

Enclosed please find the opinion issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.
April 3, 2020

BY FIRST CLASS MAIL

Darrell Paiz, President

Jicarilla Apache Nation 

P.O. Box 507

Dulce, NM 87528

Re: Revised Gaming Ordinance for the Jicarilla Apache Nation

Dear President Paiz:

On January 6, 2020, the National Indian Gaming Commission received correspondence from the Bureau 

of Indian Affairs, Southwest Region Office, enclosing the Jicarilla Apache Nation’s Revised Gaming 

Ordinance (RGO) for review. The Nation’s Council adopted this ordinance on October 31, 2019. By its 

terms, it supersedes the previous Gaming Ordinance approved by the NIGC Chairman on April 11, 1994 

and amended on June 8, 2009 and July 19, 2010. The NIGC subsequently communicated with the 

Executive Director of the Jicarilla Apache Gaming Regulatory Commission, who confirmed that the 

Nation submits this ordinance for NIGC review.

I approve the RGO, as it is consistent with the requirements of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the 

NIGC’s regulations. I do note, however, that in several sections the RGO uses the term “Investigative 

Report” rather than “Notice of Results.” The NIGC has confirmed with the Nation’s Gaming Regulatory 

Authority that in those instances, the Notice of Results is the intended document, not the Investigative 

Report, and that the Gaming Regulatory Authority submits the Notice of Results as required. 

Additionally, the RGO provides that the Nation will follow all NIGC regulations pertaining to 

background investigations.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Maria Getoff, Senior Attorney, at 202-632-7003. 

Sincerely,

E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Chairman