alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                       EXHIBIT 12
                                APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
             Computation of Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                            (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Year Ended December 31,
                                                                   1995      1996        1997       1998       1999
     <S>                                                         <C>       <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>
     Fixed Charges:
       Interest on First Mortgage Bonds. . . . . . . . . . .     $ 80,777    $ 82,082   $ 81,009   $ 72,057  $ 65,697
       Interest on Other Long-term Debt. . . . . . . . . . .       16,404      18,025     28,163     40,642    50,712
       Interest on Short-term Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . .        5,119       3,639      4,569      4,245     5,959
       Miscellaneous Interest Charges. . . . . . . . . . . .        5,323       7,327      6,857     11,470     8,212
       Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals . . . . .        7,000       6,600      6,000      5,900     6,100
                                                                 --------     -------     ------   --------  --------

            Total Fixed Charges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     $114,623    $117,673   $126,598   $134,314  $136,680
                                                                 ========    ========   ========   ========  ========

     Earnings:
       Net Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     $115,900    $133,689   $120,514   $ 93,330  $120,492
       Plus Federal Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       53,355      65,801     54,835     43,941    70,950
       Plus State Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        7,273      10,180      8,109      6,845     5,085
       Plus Fixed Charges (as above) . . . . . . . . . . . .      114,623     117,673    126,598    134,314   136,680
                                                                 --------    --------   --------   --------  --------

            Total Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     $291,151    $327,343   $310,056   $278,430  $333,207
                                                                 ========    ========   ========   ========  ========

     Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. . . . . . . . . . .         2.54        2.78       2.44       2.07      2.43
                                                                     ====        ====       ====       ====      ====
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 111 (Thursday, June 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13583]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Oregon Coast Provincial Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Oregon Coast Province Advisory Committee will meet at the 
Grand Ronde Tribal Office. The agenda includes: Stimulus Project 
Update, Secure Rural Schools Update, Travel Management Update, Spotted 
Owl Plan Update, Round Robin, WOPR Update and Public Comments.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 18, 2009, beginning at 9:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Adult Educational Building, 9615 Grand Ronde Road, Grand 
Ronde, OR 07347. Google Map will put you in the correct parking lot.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joni Quarnstrom, Public Affairs 
Specialist, Siuslaw National Forest, 541-750-7075, or write to Siuslaw 
National Forest Supervisor, 4077 SW. Research Way, Corvallis, OR 97339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Council 
Discussion is limited to Forest Service/BLM staff and Council Members. 
Lunch will be on your own. A public input session will be at 2:45 p.m. 
for fifteen minutes. The meeting is expected to adjourn around 3 p.m.

    Dated: June 3, 2009.
Joni Quarnstrom,
Public Affairs Specialist.
[FR Doc. E9-13583 Filed 6-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 113 (Monday, June 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13923]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 29, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Richard Jordahl, Fargo, North Dakota; to acquire voting shares 
of Hatton Bancshares, Inc., Fargo, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of Farmers and Merchants National Bank, Hatton, 
North Dakota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 9, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-13923 Filed 6-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
96-2078.

#### Scancarello v. Erie Ins. Co.

Franklin App. No. 96APE02-166. *Sua sponte,*the parties are to brief the merits; this cause shall be set for oral argument.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
#### SWOBODA v. CARTON FINISHERS, Inc., et al.

No. 46C366.

District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

Oct. 31, 1946.

*601Paul G. Sullins and Harry A. Sewell, both of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Collen & Kessler, of Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

In this action for unpaid minimum wages and overtime compensation, plus liquidated damages and attorney’s fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., the plaintiff moves for an order under Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, requiring the defendants to permit the plaintiff and his attorneys to inspect and copy or photograph certain records. At this time the defendants object only to the plaintiff’s inspection and copying of their gross sales records and copies of sales invoices, and this motion is therefore so limited.

The defendants contend that the records in question will disclose to the plaintiff and his attorneys confidential information with regard to the volume of defendants’ business with each of their customers. The plaintiff states that inspection of these records is necessary to reveal the proportion of interstate business in which the defendants are engaged, which fact is necessary to determine whether the plaintiff is covered by the Act. The defendants state that they have no objection to examination of delivery tickets and shipping receipts. These records show the point of origin of the materials processed by the defendants, and the destination of materials following defendants’ processing, but apparently without revealing the dollar volume of such business. It is the revelation of the dollar volume of business with particular customers which is the basis of defendants’ objections to inspection of its gross sales records and sales invoices.

In Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Company, 1946, 327 U.S. 178, 66 S.Ct. 511, 513, the Supreme Court held that the proportion of an employer’s business in interstate commerce is immaterial in determining whether an employee is covered by the Act, so long as regular shipments, and not merely “sporadic or occasional shipments of insubstantial amounts of goods,” are made in interstate commerce. The inspection of the defendants’ delivery tickets and shipping receipts, which defendants offer to the plaintiff and his attorneys at any reasonable time, should enable the plaintiff to determine whether the defendants are regularly engaged in interstate commerce. Should such inspection reveal that the defendants are only occasionally and sporadically so engaged, the volume of such commerce would then become material under the rule of the White Plains Publishing case, and the plaintiff could then apply to the court for an order to inspect defendants’ gross sales records and sales invoices. At this time the plaintiff’s motion for an order to inspect such records is denied, on the representation of the defendants that the plaintiff and his attorneys may inspect and copy or photograph defendants’ delivery tickets and shipping receipts for the period in suit at any reasonable business hour.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 111 (Thursday, June 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13678]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; NCI-ARRA Competitive Revisions--Pre-Clinical, Drug Discovery 
& Imaging.
    Date: July 22-23, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Marriott Bethesda North Hotel & Conference Center, 
Bethesda, MD.
    Contact Person: Michael B. Small, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer 
Institute, National Institutes Of Health, 6116 Executive Blvd., Room 
8127, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, 301-402-0996, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d2a1bfb3bebebf92bfb3bbbefcbcbbbafcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="30435d515c5c5d705d51595c1e5e59581e575f46">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research and Research 
Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 4, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-13678 Filed 6-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 Arizona Public Service Company
Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges
($000s)
 2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Earnings:Income From Continuing Operations
    
    $
    283,940
    
    
    $
    269,730
    
    
    $
    170,479
    
    
    $
    199,627
    
    
    $
    180,937
    
    
    $
    199,343Income Taxes
    
    
    151,157
    
    
    
    138,927
    
    
    
    98,010
    
    
    
    120,030
    
    
    
    86,854
    
    
    
    126,805Fixed Charges
    
    
    202,044
    
    
    
    191,174
    
    
    
    178,437
    
    
    
    181,372
    
    
    
    181,793
    
    
    
    168,985Total Earnings
    
    $
    637,141
    
    
    $
    599,831
    
    
    $
    446,926
    
    
    $
    501,029
    
    
    $
    449,584
    
    
    $
    495,133Fixed Charges:Interest Charges
    
    $
    170,594
    
    
    $
    158,769
    
    
    $
    145,502
    
    
    $
    146,983
    
    
    $
    147,610
    
    
    $
    133,878Amortization of Debt Discount
    
    
    4,639
    
    
    
    4,363
    
    
    
    4,085
    
    
    
    4,854
    
    
    
    3,337
    
    
    
    2,888Estimated Interest Portion of Annual Rents
    
    
    26,811
    
    
    
    28,042
    
    
    
    28,850
    
    
    
    29,535
    
    
    
    30,846
    
    
    
    32,219Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    202,044
    
    
    $
    191,174
    
    
    $
    178,437
    
    
    $
    181,372
    
    
    $
    181,793
    
    
    $
    168,985Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (rounded down)
    
    
    3.15
    
    
    
    3.13
    
    
    
    2.50
    
    
    
    2.76
    
    
    
    2.47
    
    
    
    2.93
Exhibit 23.1 Silberstein Ungar, PLLC
CPAs and Business Advisors phone (248) 203-0080
fax (248) 281-0940
30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175
Bingham Farms, MI 48025
www.sucpas.com  December 29, 2010 To the Board of Directors of

Robertson Global Health Solutions Corporation

Saginaw, MI CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-169078 of
Robertson Global Health Solutions Corporation of our report dated December 29, 2010, related to the consolidated
financial statements of Robertson Global Health Solutions Corporation and Subsidiaries as of and for the nine months
ending September 30, 2010 and for the period from April 11, 2005 (inception) through September 30, 2010, which appears
in this Annual Report on Form 10-KT.

Sincerely, /s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC Bingham Farms, MI (LOGO)
#### Maria Eugenia Guevara AVILES; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-76344.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 6, 2006.*

Filed Nov. 9, 2006.

Leslie J. Frank, Esq., Frank Greenberg *&*Simone, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jeffrey Leist, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Eugenia Aviles and Erasmo Vicario Najera, natives and citizens of Mexico and husband and wife, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, summarily affirming the immigration judge’s denial of their application for cancellation of removal.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to their United States citizen child or to female petitioner’s parents. *See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir.2005). We also lack jurisdiction to consider the petitioners’ due process challenge because the contention is not colorable. *See id.*at *654930; *see also Torres-Aguilar v. INS,*246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Darvin Guillermo MIRANDA-MORALES, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-71113.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 21, 2006.*

Filed Dec. 29, 2006.

Darvin Guillermo Miranda-Morales, Denver, CO, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Jamie M. Dowd, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Julian S. Greenspun, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division/Fraud Section, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Darvin Guillermo Miranda-Morales (Miranda-Morales), a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s *714(“U”) denial of his application for withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and his request for voluntary departure.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary denial of Miranda-Morales’ request for voluntary departure. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229c(f); *see also Oropeza-Wong v. Gonzales,*406 F.3d 1135, 1141 (9th Cir. 2005).

We have jurisdiction over the remaining claims under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Where the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision while adding its own reasons, we review both decisions. *Kataria v. INS,*232 F.3d 1107, 1112 (9th Cir.2000). We review for substantial evidence, *see INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992), and we deny the remaining claims.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of withholding of removal because Miranda-Morales failed to establish a clear probability of persecution in Guatemala on account of a protected ground. *See id.*at 482-83, 112 S.Ct. 812; *see also Garcia-Ramos v. INS,*775 F.2d 1370, 1373 (9th Cir.1985) (concluding that petitioner’s evidence failed to establish the requisite probability of persecution).

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because Miranda-Morales did not establish that it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if returned to Guatemala. *See Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part, and DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
| 1.   | Pioche-Ely      Valley Mines, Inc. is a Nevada corporation doing business under its      corporate name.  The Company beneficially owns approximately 55%      of the capital stock of Pioche-Ely Valley Mines,  Inc. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | American      Shield Refining Company is a Delaware corporation doing business under its      corporate name.  The Company owns 100% of the capital stock of      American Shield Refining Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | South      Hampton Resources International, S.L. is a Spanish corporation doing      business under its corporate name.  The Company owns 100% of the      capital stock of South Hampton Resources International,    S.L. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | Texas      Oil & Chemical Co. II, Inc. is a Texas corporation doing business      under its corporate name.  American Shield Refining Company owns      100% of the capital stock of Texas Oil & Chemical Co. II.      Inc. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | South      Hampton Resources, Inc. is a Texas corporation doing business under its      corporate name.  Texas Oil & Chemical Co. II, Inc. owns 100%      of the capital stock of South Hampton Resources,  Inc. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 6.   | Gulf      State Pipe Line Company is a Texas corporation doing business under its      corporate name.  South Hampton Resources, Inc. owns 100% of the      capital stock of Gulf State Pipe LineCompany. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
For Immediate Release Contact: Shawn Pensoneau 

 (202) 632-7003 

NIGC Announces Tribal Consultation set for Washington, D.C. 

Washington, DC, December 28, 2010 — The National Indian Gaming Commission 

(Commission) has announced a government-to-government consultation to be held 

January 24, 2011, at the Department of the Interior South Auditorium in Washington, 

D.C. 

“The Commission places a high priority on consultation. We are eager to engage in a 

meaningful dialogue with tribes as we begin to consider the relevance of the 

Commission’s current regulations for today’s industry and what can be done to 

improve them in order to better protect the industry,” said Chairwoman Stevens. “As 

the primary regulators for the Indian gaming industry, tribes and tribal regulators are 

uniquely positioned to provide the NIGC with relevant information and feedback. We 

look forward to the discussion.” 

A Notice of Inquiry was published in the Federal Register November 18, 2010, 

notifying the public that the Commission is conducting a comprehensive review of all 

regulations promulgated to implement the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA). 

The NOI encourages input regarding which regulations need revision and what 

process should be utilized to revise them. 

This process is consistent with Executive Order 13,175, “Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,” and reflects the Commission’s 

commitment to hold discussions prior to initiating the rulemaking process and before 

drafting proposed rules. 

All information on the regulatory review, including the Federal Register notice can be 

found by visiting our website at www.nigc.gov. 

The consultations are scheduled on January 24, 2011 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the 

Department of the Interior. Consultations are being held utilizing a group discussion 

format. 

If you have questions or need additional information prior to the meetings, please 

contact Rita Homa, at (202) 632-7003. 

The NIGC is an independent regulatory agency established within the Department of the Interior pursuant to the 

Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. 

###