alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          21,260
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,952
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    100,012
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         111,015
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           110,432
<LOANS>                                        413,449
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 677,306
<DEPOSITS>                                     499,507
<SHORT-TERM>                                   111,291
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,993
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,909
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 677,306
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,739
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,345
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    43
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,127
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,720
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,286
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,121
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      455
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  59
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (292)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (103)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.79
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,660
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    981
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,737
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       82
<RECOVERIES>                                        38
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,148
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hybred International, Inc. (the Company) on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary Kouletas, President of the Company, respectfully certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









/s/ Gary Kouletas

Gary Kouletas

President (Principal Executive Officer)





Date: November 9, 2009



This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hybred International, Inc. and will be retained by Hybred International, Inc.. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
MOTION DOCKET

92-405.

#### State v. Hawkins.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-900092 and C-910017. On motion to set execution date. Motion granted.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.4798
<CASH>                                               9
<SECURITIES>                                        52
<RECEIVABLES>                                       87
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         67
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   215
<PP&E>                                            1458
<DEPRECIATION>                                     523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              111
<BONDS>                                           1200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         16
<COMMON>                                           641
<OTHER-SE>                                       (841)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1286
<SALES>                                            312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   359
<CGS>                                              219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      262
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (2)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (10)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (12)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (12)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,849]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 24, 2009, in response to a petition filed by Woodworkers/IAM Local Lodge W536 on behalf of all workers at Stimson Lumber Company, Clatskaine, Oregon.

The petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of May 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13462 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


        Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the
undersigned Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Fortis Benefits Insurance
Company (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



/s/ LARRY CAINS
---------------
Larry Cains
August 14, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

_____________________

No. 16-70027

_____________________

MELISSA ELIZABETH LUCIO, 

Petitioner - Appellant 

v. 

LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, 

Respondent - Appellee 

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

__________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion July 29, 2019, 5 Cir., 2019, 783 Fed.Appx. 313)

Before OWEN, Chief Judge, JONES, SMITH, STEWART, DENNIS,

ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, COSTA, 

WILLETT, HO, DUNCAN, ENGELHARDT, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for 

rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active 

service and not disqualified having voted in favor, 

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc

with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a

briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 20, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law

of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 4/24/96 TENTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM LUCKY LENHART, Petitioner - Appellant, No. 95-6335 v. (D.C. No. CIV-95-1123-M) R. MICHAEL CODY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, (W.D. Okla.) Respondents - Appellees.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Petitioner is asserting a right to counsel in his first state post-conviction2

proceeding because he did not use his right to counsel through a direct appeal. He argues that the post-conviction proceeding should be considered his first appeal because he never had a direct appeal from his guilty plea. The district court rejected this argument. We affirm for substantially the reasons given in the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation as adopted by the district court. Also, Petitioner claims that he was never advised of his right to direct appeal. This issue was not exhausted by the state’s highest court. Petitioner must completely exhaust all state remedies before resorting to the federal courts. Anderson v. Harless , 459 U.S. 4 (1982). We dismiss this claim without prejudice. AFFIRMED in part and DISMISSED in part. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
#### Digestive Disease and Nutrition Center of Westchester, LLP, Respondent, v Richard Abrams, Appellant.

[977 NYS2d 286]

In an action to recover on two written guarantees, brought by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the defendant appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), entered July 25, 2011, as granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and denied his cross *779motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the action for lack of personal jurisdiction, and (2) from a judgment of the same court entered August 16, 2011, which, upon the order, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the total sum of $81,378.42.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment in the action *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The plaintiff brought this action to recover on two written guarantees by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213. The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion. The plaintiff made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting proof of the existence of two underlying promissory notes, which contained guarantees executed by the defendant, and a failure to make payment in accordance with the terms of the notes and guarantees *(see TD Bank, N.A. v Piccolo Mondo 21st Century, Inc.,*98 AD3d 499, 500 [2012]; *Provident Bank v Giannasca,*55 AD3d 812 [2008]). In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to a bona fide defense.

The parties’ remaining contentions either are without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination. Mastro, J.P, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              21
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      156
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        217
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   414
<PP&E>                                           7,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,795)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,787
<BONDS>                                             51
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,036
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,229)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,694
<SALES>                                            372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   372
<CGS>                                              722
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,185)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,185)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Web2 Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB
      for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on August 14, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Darren Cioffi, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Darren Cioffi





Darren
      Cioffi


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      14, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andrew C. McQuality, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 918]

Rose, J.P

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main Jr., J.), rendered January 26, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

When defendant’s appeal was previously before this Court, we rejected an *Anders*brief, withheld decision and assigned new counsel to address at least one issue of arguable merit pertaining to the order of protection imposed in connection with the sentence (100 AD3d 1186 [2012]). Defendant now maintains that County Court erred in imposing an eight-year order of protection in favor of his children. A review of the record, however, reveals that this issue is unpreserved for our review as defendant did not object to the order of protection at sentencing or move to amend the final order of protection on this ground *(see People v Nieves,*2 NY3d 310, 315-317 [2004]; *People v Shaw,*78 AD3d 1376, 1377 [2010]; *People v Decker,*77 AD3d 675, 675 [2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 952 [2010]). “Moreover, considering that defendant specifically agreed to the terms of the order of protection as part of his plea, we decline to exercise our interest *984of justice jurisdiction” *(People v Smith,*83 AD3d 1213, 1214 [2011]).

McCarthy, Spain and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
97-419.

#### State ex rel. Adams v. Ghee.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7151

ALVON ALLEN THOMAS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CA-02-426-1)

Submitted: December 9, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2003

Before WILLIAMS and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvon Allen Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alvon Allen Thomas, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and dismissing for failure to file in the proper court his petition

filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We grant Thomas’s motion for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially

on the reasoning of the district court, but modify the district

court’s order to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice to

Thomas’ right to refile in the proper court. See Thomas v. United

States, No. CA-02-426-1 (M.D.N.C. filed July 2, 2002, entered July

5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Exhibit 32(i)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,



|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.





|/s/ Carolyn C. ShanksCarolyn C. Shanks
Chair of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer of
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	February 28, 2008
**Fire Management AdministrationChecklist #02**

**Fire Management Administration Checklist #02**

For the National Preparedness Review you will need to have the following items available for review.

**2-1Revised 2010**

**2-2Revised 2010**