alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-Q AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,065
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,089
<INVENTORY>                                     39,994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,337
<PP&E>                                          27,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,783
<BONDS>                                         10,095
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,087
<SALES>                                         45,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,095
<CGS>                                           37,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,083
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     29
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 22
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        22
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
 CALCULATION OF THE MAXIMUM NOTES BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2005
UNDER THE SENIOR SECURED NOTES FACILITY DATED JANUARY 13, 2005
(dollars in thousands)
 I. Lesser of:A. the product of:1. the Free Cash Flow Multiple
    
    
    9.0
    xMultiplied by2. Services Business Free Cash Flow
    
    $
    7,003$
    63,027OrB. the product of:x. 2.0 times
    
    
    2.0
    xmultiplied byy. Services Business Revenue
    
    $
    18,698$
    37,396II. Lesser of1. 50% of the results of the immediately preceding clause (I)
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    18,698Or2. 30% of the Companys After-tax PV10
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    11,141III. 10% of the Companys After-tax PV10
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    3,714Maximum Notes Balance = (I) + (II) + (III)
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    52,251Aggregate Notes Outstanding at Determination Date
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    30,000Companys After-tax PV10 as of June 30, 2005
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    37,135Services Business Revenue {Section 2(a)(xxxx)}
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    18,698Services Business operating income
    
    $
    5,709Services Business depreciation and amortization expense
    
    
    1,294Less: Any net operating income from affiliates
    
    
    (A) Services Business net operating income before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    7,003(B) Aggregate interest paid on permitted indebtedness
    
    
    
    
    
    
    280Services Business capital expenditures
    
    $
    2,827Less: Issuances of stock by Infinity, less costs
    
    
    (9,478
    )Less: Aggregate interest expense
    
    
    (280
    )Services Business capital expenditures, not funded
    
    
    (280
    )
    
    
    (280
    )Services Business Free Cash Flow {Section 2(a)(xxxix)}
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    7,003
Exhibit 10.2


 


 


 


[TRANSLATION FROM HEBREW]


State of Israel


Energy Ministry


 


Fuel and Gas Authority


3 Av 5782


31 July 2022


_423_2022


To:


 


Mr. Jeffrey Moskowitz


Managing Director Zion Oil & Gas Inc.


Caesarea


 


Re: Approval Extension License New Megiddo
428 


Reference: Your request 25 July to Extend the License
for the Purpose of completing MJ-2 Well Production Tests


 


After consultation with the Advisory Council pursuant
to the Petroleum Law and in accordance with the reasoning set forth in your referenced letter I hereby approve the extension of the “New
Megiddo " / 428 license to February 1 ,2023 for the purpose only of completing the activities regarding MJ2 drilling and in accordance
with the schedule as set forth in the above mentioned request .


 


Another application for an extension shall be considered
if and inasmuch as it shall be proven that you have encountered extraordinary circumstances and after consultation with the Advisory Council
pursuant to the Petroleum Law.


 


Sincerely,


 


Chen Bar- Yoseph,


Substitute Petroleum Commissioner.


 


CC.


 


Mr. Lior Shilat Managing Director Ministry of Energy


Members of the Professional Staff, Natural Resources
Authority, Ministry of Energy


Mr. Elad Golan, Head of Regulatory Section, Ministry
of Energy


Advocate Yonit Vannu Shrem Legal Department, Ministry
of Energy
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortis Benefits Insurance
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert B. Pollock
--------------------------
Robert B. Pollock
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2003




                                       16
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         289,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,877,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                   368,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,664,906
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,125,440
<PP&E>                                       7,889,213
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,116,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,152,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,253,644
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,519
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,820,301
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,152,464
<SALES>                                     14,588,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,588,739
<CGS>                                       11,410,117
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,410,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,989,966
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             349,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,160,355)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,160,355)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,160,355)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.66)


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Jorge Escal ante

,

Appellant

,

v.

Claudia B. Escalante

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 067

- C V

Appeal from the

388 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 201 5DCM8192 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ee ’ s third motion for extension of time within which to file

the b rief until Ma y 7

, 201 9

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO F ILE

THE APPELL EE ’ S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Lyda Ness Garcia

, the Appell ee ’ s attorney, prepare

the Appell ee ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or b efore Ma y 7 , 201 9

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 nd day of A pril

, 20 1 9.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 02-4184

JOHN ROBERT GROOM,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken.

Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge.

(CR-01-383)

Submitted: October 23, 2002

Decided: November 18, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Katherine E. Evatt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Columbia,

South Carolina, for Appellant. Anthony S. Murry, Trial Attorney,

Terrorism and Violent Crime Section, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

John Robert Groom appeals his conviction for transmitting in interstate commerce a communication containing a threat to injure the person of another in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) (2000). Groom was

convicted following a bench trial in the District Court of South Carolina and sentenced to eighteen months of imprisonment to be followed

by a two-year term of supervised release. On appeal, Groom contends

that there was insufficient evidence to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Finding no reversible error, we affirm. 

We must uphold Groom’s conviction on appeal if there is substantial evidence in the record to support it. See Glasser v. United States,

315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). In determining whether the evidence in the

record is substantial, we view the evidence in the light most favorable

to the government and inquire whether there is evidence that a reasonable finder of fact could accept as adequate and sufficient to support

a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. United

States v. Burgos, 94 F.3d 849, 862 (4th Cir. 1996) (en banc). Groom

stipulated that he transmitted the letter at issue in interstate commerce. We have reviewed the record and conclude that there was sufficient evidence to find the letter contained a true threat. Accordingly,

we affirm Groom’s conviction. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. GROOM
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHS
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A-2 for the
quarterly period ended November 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John Schmitz, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ JOHN SCHMITZ                                        
| |                                                         
| | John Schmitz                                            
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer

March 2, 2004
June 5, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

COLLEGE OF THE MAINLAND, Appellant

NO. 14-13-01047-CV V.

BRUCE GLOVER, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the trial court’s order denying the “Motion for 

Summary Judgment” filed by appellant, College of the Mainland (the “College”), 

signed on November 18, 2013 in favor of appellee, Bruce Glover, was heard on the 

transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find that the undisputed 

facts negate the College’s alleged waiver of immunity. We therefore order the 

judgment of the court below REVERSED and RENDER judgment dismissing 

with prejudice Bruce Glover’s claims against the College.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee, Bruce Glover.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Tony L. REED, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-6649.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 3, 2006.

*308Tony L. Reed, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Tony L. Reed seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certifícate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Reed has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Analysts International Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Brittany B. McKinney, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Randy W. Strobel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
The   Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated:   February 24, 2011
By:
/s/   Brittany B. McKinneyBrittany   B. McKinneyPresident   and Chief Executive OfficerDated:   February 24, 2011
By:
/s/   Randy W. StrobelRandy   W. StrobelSenior   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60271

 

MARIO ALBERTO FLORES-GONZALEZ,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT,

ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A34-609-635

--------------------

March 7, 2002

Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mario Alberto Flores-Gonzalez petitions for review of an

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) holding that

Flores-Gonzalez’s state conviction for felony driving while

intoxicated was an aggravated felony warranting his removal from

this country. The respondent has moved to dismiss the petition

for review and to remand the case to the BIA for reconsideration

in light of United States v. Chapa-Garza, 243 F.3d 921, 927 (5th

Cir. 2001). Flores-Gonzalez has filed a response in which he
No. 01-60271

-2-

agrees that the case should be remanded to the BIA for

reconsideration in light of Chapa-Garza.

Flores-Gonzalez’s petition for review is GRANTED. The order

of the BIA is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the BIA for

disposition consistent with Chapa-Garza, 243 F.3d at 927. All

other outstanding motions are DENIED.
# Wireless

This website is intended for NIFC employees and guests that would like to use the NIFC Wireless Network. We have one Service Set Identifier (SSID) NIFC Guest. The NIFC Guest Wi-Fi is for guests, visitors, and campus employees to use while on campus for web, email, and communications needs. Print and filesharing is not enabled.

This Wi-Fi connection does not provide direct access to internal agency networks.

The links below have step-by-step instructions for connecting to NIFC Guest, minor variations may occur depending on the device and its software version.

If you have any questions or are in need of assistance with the process, please contact the NIFC Help Desk at (208) 387-5734 or email nifchelp@blm.gov

## NIFC Guest instructions:

Guest Wireless Login (Apple devices)

Guest Wireless Login (Android devices) 

Guest Wireless Login (Windows 7 Laptops) 

Guest Wireless Login (DOI Employees)

## More About Us

-  What is NIFC? 
-  NIFC Campus 
-  Our Partners 
-  NIFC History 
-  Working with  Us 
-  NIFC Help Desk    -  Telephones 
  -  Wireless 
  -  IQCS Help Desk 
  -  Help Desk Links 
-  Social Media 
-  Media Submission
!"#!$%!&'( 

)*)+
,!-./-01,23# 

45*6789:;'<=>;?@"" 

AA7)
B+C2@!$%!&>( 

+DA

74EFG!% 

B6)CHIJ1KLMNJ1 L!?!-#O<,23#!.CHIJLPO!3Q-.C2#/?!3R 

AA7)
7CHIJ1KLMNJ1;> S!?T-/?QO #Q-.Q&.3 

B+A7)CHIJ1KLMNJ1;MLKS; J2$$!-#2-KLM2?U;V>W 

+DA))575A*)7 *ALQ@!-S/##O! 5

 

X/?T/0Q-@!CY J 

GQ3T/-0#2-  ( ZA*[&?#/##O!\0$Q/OR?2$ ]7V 



^75*[AA7) ST!CQ#/2-QOH-./Q-IQ$/-0J2$$/33/2-P&0/-0#2Q33/3##&/%QO02@!&-$!-#3(0Q$/-0&!0POQ#2&< QP#T2&/#/!3(Q-.2"!&Q#/2-3/3-!?!33Q&<#2!-3P&!#TQ#CQ#/@!#&/%!3Q&!%!/-0"&20&!33/@!_/#T&!0POQ#/-0 #T!/&#!&&/#2&/!3R /-?!''(#T!&!TQ3%!!-&!0POQ#/2-2-0Q$/-02-H-./Q-OQ-.3#2$Q:!3P&!#TQ##T! Q-/$QO3#TQ#&!3/.!2-#T!3!OQ-.3Q&!-2#%!/-02@!&:/OO!.RN-N?#2%!&'('(#T!K!.!&QOL!0/3#&Q& /$"O!$!-#!.Q&PO!#2`P&#T!&&!0POQ#!0Q$/-02-CQ#/@!OQ-.3#2!-3P&!#T!/-#!0&/#<Q-.3!?P&/#<2` JOQ33HH0Q$/-0RST/3_Q3Q-!?!33Q&</$"O!$!-#!.&PO!%!?QP3!#T!CQ#/@!"!2"O!2-O<TQ@!32$P?T .!3/0-Q#!.OQ-.`2&#T!$3!O@!3Q-.#T!3!"!2"O!QO32-!!.#2!-3P&!#TQ##T!OQ-.3#TQ##T!<.22_-Q&! 3#Q%O!Q-.Q&!Q%O!#2"&2@/.!Q3$Q-<-!!.!.&!32P&?!3Q3"233/%O!R
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3232 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3232

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make employers of spouses 
    of military personnel eligible for the work opportunity credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 20, 2010

 Mr. Burr (for himself and Mr. Burris) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make employers of spouses 
    of military personnel eligible for the work opportunity credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Spouses Employment Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF SPOUSES OF MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR THE WORK 
              OPPORTUNITY CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of 
subparagraph (H), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (I) 
and inserting ``, or'', and by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(J) a qualified military spouse.''.
    (b) Qualified Military Spouse.--Subsection (d) of section 51 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating paragraphs 
(11), (12), (13), and (14) as paragraphs (12), (13), (14), and (15), 
respectively, and by inserting after paragraph (10) the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(11) Qualified military spouse.--The term `qualified 
        military spouse' means any individual who is certified by the 
        designated local agency as being a spouse (determined as of the 
        hiring date) of a member of the Armed Forces of the United 
        States who is serving on a period of extended active duty which 
        includes the hiring date. For purposes of the preceding 
        sentence, the term `extended active duty' means any period of 
        active duty pursuant to a call or order to such duty for a 
        period in excess of 90 days or for an indefinite period.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made this section shall apply 
to amounts paid or incurred after the date of the enactment of this Act 
to individuals who begin work for the employer after such date.
                                 <all>
```