alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

*Time and Date:*                         9 a.m.-5 p.m., July 14, 2009 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Marriott Waterfront, 700 Aliceanna Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202; Telephone: (410) 385-3000.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters to be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Respirable Dust Control Related to Mining, PA 07-318.”                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         George Bockosh, Scientific Review Administrator, Office Of Extramural Programs, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop P05, Atlanta Georgia 30333; Telephone: (412) 352-5181;                         *GBockosh@cdc.gov.*

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: June 3, 2009.

Lorenzo Falgiano,

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-13557 Filed 6-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
*Wednesday, March 5, 1997*

*1420MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

96-2742.

#### State v. Greene.

Scioto App. No. 94CA2297. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due February 28, 1997, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua sponte.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7605

DESMOND CHARLES LAWRENCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIEUTENANT DAMON, in his individual capacity, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-97-155-3-19-BC) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: October 23, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Desmond Charles Lawrence, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief onhis 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lawrence v. Damon , No. CA-97-155-3-19-BC (D.S.C. Oct. 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-86745, Form S-8 No. 333-86497, Form S-8 No.
333-09215, Form S-8 No. 333-12145, Form S-8 No. 333-19417, Form S-8 No.
333-24727, Form S-8 No. 333-49049, Form S-8 No. 333-68245, Form S-3 No.
333-62875, Form S-3 No. 333-62875-01, Form S-3 No. 333-62875-02 and Form S-3
No. 333-92875-03) of our report dated January 27, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Associates First Capital Corporation
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 28, 2000
Document

                                        
Exhibit 10.56




SCHEDULE OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO HAVE ENTERED INTO THE 2018 FORM OF INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT 10.55
NAME 
Damon J. Audia
Judith L. Bacchus
Franklin Cardenas
Sanjay Chowbey
Michelle R. Keating
Carlonda R. Reilly
Patrick S. Watson
----

Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
I, Michael Ash, CFO of The Tirex Corporation (the "Company") do herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 
-  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the  period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company. 
/s/________________ Michael Ash, CFO 

Date: May 12, 2005
#### Nadine Yvette LAFELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentAppellee.

No. 06-1783.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 2, 2006.

Nadine Yvette Lafell, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. Greene, Michael J. Haungs, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Nadine Yvette Lafell appeals the tax court’s order dismissing her petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. *Lafell v. Comm’r, IRS,*Tax Ct. No. 05-20562 (U.S. Tax Ct. May 2, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Document

Exhibit 10.1

First Amendment to the
comScore, Inc.
Amended and Restated
2018 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (the “First Amendment”) to the comScore, Inc. Amended and Restated 2018 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by comScore, Inc.’s (the “Company’s”) board of directors (the “Board”) on April 22, 2022 to be effective June 15, 2022 (the “Effective Date”).
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Company previously adopted the Plan, under which the Company is authorized to grant equity-based incentive awards to certain employees and service providers of the Company;
WHEREAS, the Company’s Board has determined that it is desirable to amend the Plan, effective as of the Effective Date and subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company, to increase the maximum number of shares for which Awards may be granted under the Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 18 of the Plan provides that the Board may amend the Plan from time to time, subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company as required by applicable law.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as of the Effective Date, subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders, as set forth below: 
1.    Section 3(a)(i) of the Plan shall be deleted and replaced with the following:
Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 11 of this Plan and the share counting rules set forth in Section 3(b) of this Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock available under this Plan for awards of (A) Option Rights or Appreciation Rights, (B) Restricted Stock, (C) Restricted Stock Units, (D) Performance Shares or Performance Units, (E) awards contemplated by Section 9 of this Plan, (F) dividend equivalents paid with respect to awards made under this Plan, or (G) awards corresponding to those described in the preceding clauses (A) through (F) that were made under the Prior Plan will not exceed in the aggregate 27,850,000 shares of Common Stock. Such shares may be shares of original issuance or treasury shares or a combination of the foregoing.
2.    Section 3(c) of the Plan shall be deleted and replaced with the following:
Limit on Incentive Stock Options. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Plan, and subject to adjustment as provided in Section 11 of this Plan, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock actually issued or transferred by the Company upon the exercise of Incentive Stock Options (whether granted under this Plan or the Prior Plan) will not exceed 27,850,000 shares of Common Stock.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further provided that, except as set forth above, the Plan shall continue to read in its current state.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused the execution of this First Amendment by its duly authorized officer, effective as of the Effective Date and subject to approval of the Company’s stockholders.




															
		COMSCORE, INC.
		 
		By:	 

		Name:	 Ashley Wright
		Title:	 Secretary
		Date:	April 22, 2022
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Anthony White, Respondent, v Consolidated Edison et al., Respondents, and Special Fund for Reopened Cases, Appellant. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 929]

Peters, EJ.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 24, 2012, which transferred liability to the Special Fund for Reopened Cases pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a.

Claimant suffered a right knee injury in 2003 and received workers’ compensation benefits. He was eventually awarded a 10% schedule loss of use of his right leg in 2005, with no further action planned. Claimant also sustained a work-related injury to his neck and back in 2005, which he later sought to amend to include a consequential right knee injury. In 2009, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge directed that the 2003 claim be “open[ed]” and travel with the 2005 claim. Claimant subsequently withdrew his contention regarding the consequential knee injury, and was found to have sustained a permanent partial disability in the 2005 claim.

In 2011, claimant requested further proceedings in the 2003 claim, pointing to a medical report indicating that he was *1056entitled to a 30% schedule loss of use award for his right leg. The self-insured employer, in turn, argued that liability on the claim should be shifted to the Special Fund for Reopened Cases *(see*Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a). The Workers’ Compensation Board determined that the right knee treatment occasioned by the 2005 injury did not constitute a reopening of the 2003 claim and, accordingly, shifted liability for that claim to the Special Fund. The Special Fund now appeals.

We reverse. Among the arguments raised by the Special Fund in its application for Board review was that the 2009 decision of a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge — which authorized right knee surgery and directed that the 2003 claim be “open[ed]” and travel with the 2005 claim — barred the shifting of liability pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a. Inasmuch as the Board “failed to resolve or even acknowledge the existence of such an issue,” we remit so that it can make the necessary findings of fact *(Matter of Tucker v Fort Hudson Nursing Home,*65 AD3d 1442, 1442 [2009]; *see Matter of Searfoss v Anchor Glass Container Corp.,*78 AD3d 1368, 1369 [2010]).

Lahtinen, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3030 

To amend the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to 

eliminate cost-sharing requirements in connection with economic adjustment grants made to assist communities that have suffered economic 

injury as a result of military base closures and realignments, defense 

contractor reductions in force, and Department of Energy defense-related 

funding reductions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2010 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Works and Economic Development 

Act of 1965 to eliminate cost-sharing requirements in 

connection with economic adjustment grants made to 

assist communities that have suffered economic injury 

as a result of military base closures and realignments, 

defense contractor reductions in force, and Department 

of Energy defense-related funding reductions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3030 IS

1 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF COST-SHARING REQUIRE2 MENTS FOR CERTAIN ECONOMIC ADJUST3 MENT GRANTS. 

4 Section 204(c) of the Public Works and Economic 

5 Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3144(c)) is amended 

6 by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(4) CERTAIN ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT

8 GRANTS.—In the case of a grant made under section 

9 209 to a community that has suffered economic in10 jury as a result of a military base closure or realign11 ment, defense contractor reduction in force, or De12 partment of Energy defense-related funding reduc13 tion, the Federal share of the cost of the project as14 sisted by the grant shall be 100 percent instead of 

15 the percentage specified in subsection (a).’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.







|/s/ Leo P. DenaultLeo P. Denault
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Entergy Corporation
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:	February 28, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                         <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>               6-MOS
<CASH>                            2,711
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                    49,443
<ALLOWANCES>                      1,614
<INVENTORY>                      83,113
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                138,163
<PP&E>                           82,648
<DEPRECIATION>                   23,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  254,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           116,973
<BONDS>                          96,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                       3,878
<COMMON>                          2,444
<OTHER-SE>                       30,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    254,355
<SALES>                         218,920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                218,920
<CGS>                           197,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   197,210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    352
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               10,188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (2,531)
<INCOME-TAX>                       (911)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,620)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     (1,620)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (1.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (1.88)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Elwood Shepard, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the ACompany@), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: August 12, 2003                                                 By: /s/ Elwood Shepard

Elwood Shepard

Chief Executive Officer





Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(h)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.









|/s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of
Entergy Louisiana, LLC
(acting principal financial officer)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	February 27, 2009
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3200 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, New York, 

as the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3200 ES

1 SECTION 1. ZACHARY SMITH POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 23 Genesee Street in Hornell, 

4 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Zachary 

5 Smith Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, or other record of the United States 

8 to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 

9 to be a reference to the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post Office Build10 ing’’. 

Passed the Senate May 25, 2010. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3200 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. Hornell, New York, as the ‘‘Zachary Smith Post al Service located at 23 Genesee Street in