alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



     We  hereby  consent  to  the   incorporation   by  reference  in  the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52125)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc.  Deferred  Compensation  and Stock  Incentive  Plan for  Non-Employee
Directors, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 2-95022) pertaining
to the Ashland Inc. Amended Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees, in the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-32612)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc.  Employee Savings Plan, in the  Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-26101)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan, in the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-55922)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc. 1993 Stock  Incentive Plan, in the  Registration  Statement (Form S-8
No.  33-49907)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Leveraged  Employee  Stock
Ownership  Plan, in the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  33-62901)
pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.  Deferred  Compensation  Plan,  in  the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-33617) pertaining to the Ashland
Inc. 1997 Stock  Incentive Plan, in the  Registration  Statement (Form S-3
No. 333-78675)  pertaining to the registration of 68,925 shares of Ashland
Inc. Common Stock, in the Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-36842)
pertaining to the  registration  of 96,600  shares of Ashland Inc.  Common
Stock, in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-54766)  pertaining
to the  Amended and  Restated  Ashland  Inc.  Incentive  Plan,  and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-70651) pertaining to the offering
of $600,000,000 of Debt Securities,  Preferred Stock,  Depository  Shares,
Common Stock and/or Warrants of Ashland Inc., of our report dated February
7,  2001,  relating  to  the  financial  statements  of  Marathon  Ashland
Petroleum LLC included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1)
for the year ended September 30, 2000.





                                        /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                        PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                        Pittsburgh, PA

March 30, 2001
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION**




Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
      and
      (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UNITED STATES Code)




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Zoom Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
      “Company”), does hereby certify that:




The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Form
      10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
                August 14, 2008**/s/
                Robert A. Crist**Robert
                A. CristVice
                President of Finance and Chief Financial
                Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 05, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 05, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0198. JOHN RICHARDS et al. v. VINAY BOSE et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 18CV1887
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 106 (Thursday, June 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13140]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION

Sunshine Act Meeting for the 31st Annual Board of Directors

Time and Date: 12:15 p.m., Wednesday, June 3, 2009.

Place: 1325 G Street, NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.

Status: Open.

Contact Person for More Information: Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate 
Secretary; (202) 220-2376; [email protected].

Agenda: 

I. Call To Order.
II. Approval of the Minutes.
III. Summary Report of the Audit Committee.
IV. Summary Report of the Corporate Administration Committee.
V. Summary Report of the Finance, Budget and Program Committee.
VI. Board Appointments.
VII. Financial Report.
VIII. Corporate Scorecard.
IX. Chief Executive Officer's Quarterly Management Report.
X. Adjournment.

Erica Hall,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13140 Filed 6-2-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7570-02-P
```
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Richard N. Myers, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1337 C.D. 2019

: Pennsylvania Public Utility :

Commission, :

Respondent :

AMENDING ORDER

NOW, this 1 3 th day of December

, 2023

, it is hereby ORDERED that

the Opinion and Order filed on November 3 , 2023 is hereby withdrawn and replaced

with the attached a mended Opinion and Order , amending the citation in footnote 3

on page 9. The footnote now reads as follows :

“... the Fourth Amendment of the United States

Constitution, U.S. Const. amend IV

. ”

________________________________ PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge
exhibit10






FIRST AMENDMENT TO  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT  THIS IS THE FIRST AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”), dated as of May 9, 2022, to that  certain Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of August 10, 2021, by and between by  and between Spark SocialNet, Inc. (f/k/a Social Net, Inc.) (the “Company”) and David Clark  (Executive”).  The Company and Executive wish to amend the Agreement on the terms and conditions set  forth herein.  Therefore, in consideration of the mutual agreements set forth herein and intending to be  legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:  1. Capitalized Terms.  Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 2. Removal of Certain Language.  The following sentence is hereby removed in its entirety from Section 4(b) of the Agreement: “Such Severance shall be reduced by any remuneration paid to Executive because of  Executive’s employment or self-employment during the severance period, and  Executive shall promptly report all such remuneration to the Company in writing.”  3. Ratification of Agreement.  Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement is hereby ratified in full (including without limitation the provisions of Section 4(b) thereof other than the sentence removed by this Amendment) and shall, as so changed by this Amendment, continue in full force and effect. 4. Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed and delivered originally or by facsimile and in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which taken together shall constitute a single instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Amendment on the date first  above written.  SPARK SOCIALNET, INC.  __________________________________  By:  Eric Eichmann  Title:  Chief Executive Officer  __________________________________  David Clark  Exhibit 10.2
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Associates First Capital Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 33-60769) of our
report dated January 28, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Associates First Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995, and
1994, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                            COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
Dallas, Texas
March 25, 1997
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ J. Wayne Leonard                        		J. Wayne Leonard
Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Corporation


Date:  	March 9, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13443]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,331]


Trueseal Technologies, Barbourville, KY; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on April 27, 2009, in response 
to a petition filed by on behalf of workers of Truseal Technologies, 
Barbourville, Kentucky.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 5th day of May, 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13443 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A1136, A18A1137. ROBERT CHRISTOPHER EDWARDS v. THE STATE

(two cases).

A jury found Robert Edwards guilty of several sexual offenses, and we

affirmed his judgment of conviction in an unpublished opinion on direct appeal. 

Edwards v. State, No. A15A0209 (July 14, 2015). Edwards later filed two

extraordinary motions for a new trial. On August 17, 2016, the trial court denied the

first of these motions. On September 9, 2016, Edwards filed a notice of appeal from

that order, which has been docketed in this Court as Case No. A18A1136. The trial

court dismissed Edwards’s second such motion on June 8, 2017. Edwards filed a

notice of appeal from that order on June 21, 2017. That appeal has been docketed in

this Court as Case No. A18A1137. We lack jurisdiction over both appeals.

An appeal from an order denying or dismissing an extraordinary motion for a

new trial must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA

§ 5-6-35 (a) (7), (b); Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997);

Davis v. State, 182 Ga. App. 736, 736-737 (356 SE2d 762) (1987). “[C]ompliance

with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Fabe v. Floyd, 199 Ga.

App. 322, 332 (1) (405 SE2d 265) (1991). Edwards’s failure to follow the

discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over both appeals. 

February 22, 2018
Consequently, Case Nos.A18A1136 and A18A1137 are herebyDISMISSED for lack

of jurisdiction. See Balkcom, 227 Ga. App. at 332; Davis, 182 Ga. App. at 736-737.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/22/2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LEGEND
PROPERTIES, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH MARCH 31,
2000 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND 1999 ANNUAL REPORT FILED ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      14,296,269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,344,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 71,461,811
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      30,899,508
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,441,192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,040,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     18,736,042
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,117
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,510
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               121,040,967
<SALES>                                     13,327,228
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,180,101
<CGS>                                       10,250,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,674,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,281,982
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,395,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,776,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   627,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,154,587)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,154,587)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 96-30791

____________________

LAWRENCE CHILDRESS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

M. I. DRILLING FLUIDS, L.L.C.,

Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

( 95-CV-2141 )

__________________________________________

January 30, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM*:

Lawrence Childress appeals the summary judgment awarded M. I.

Drilling Fluids, L.L.C. concerning the termination of his

employment with M. I. Drilling on 8 August 1994. On 31 October

1995, Childress filed a charge with the EEOC, claiming violation of

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. 621; the charge

was filed far more than 180 days after he received the notice of

termination. 
The EEOC charge was untimely, for essentially the reasons

stated by the district court. Childress v. M. I. Drilling Fluids,

L.L.C., (95-CV-2141)(17 July, 1996)(unpublished); see also Blumberg

v. HCA Management Co., Inc., 848 F.2d 642 (5th Cir. 1988), cert.

denied, 488 U.S. 1007 (1989). 

 AFFIRMED
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 31, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D22-423

Lower Tribunal No. 21-15145

Birol Ozyesilpinar,

Appellant, 

vs.

GLM Omnimedia Group LLC, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. 

Echarte, Jr., Judge.

Birol Ozyesilpinar, in proper person.

Holland & Knight, LLP, Scott D. Ponce and Benjamin A. Taormina, for 

appellees Voice Media Group, LLC, Voice Media Group, Inc., and Miami 

New Times, LLC; Toth Funes PA, Brian Toth and Freddy Funes, for 

appellees DMG Media, Ltd., Daily Mail and General Trust PLC, and 

Associated Newspapers Ltd.; Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, and James H. 

Wyman, for appellee Raw Story Media, Inc.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Ozyesilpinar v. Reach PLC, 48 Fla. L. Weekly D1004a 

(Fla. 3d DCA May 17, 2023).
Exhibit 32(b)








This Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such filing.








Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title 18 of the United States Code








In connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Power Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Brian X. Tierney, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Brian X. Tierney


Brian X. Tierney


Chief Financial Officer








February 24, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40363

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

FRANK C. ALESI ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 641

Filed: August 28, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourt h Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Richard D. Greenwood , District Judge.

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben Patrick McGreevy

, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Frank C. Alesi pled guilty to two counts of felony using a telephone to harass . Idaho

Code § 18

- 6710 . The district court sentenced Alesi to a unified sentence of five years with two
years determinate for the first count and a consecutive sentence of five years indeterminate for

the second count. Alesi filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court denied.

Alesi appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by denying his I.C.R. 35

motion

. A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 3 18, 319, 144 P.3d

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In
presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of2 new or additional information subsequently provided t o the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). An appeal from the
denial of a Rule 35 motion cannot be used as a vehicle to review the underlying sentence absent
the presentation of new info rmation. Id. Because no new or additional information in support of

Alesi ’s Rule 35 motion was presented , the district court did not abuse its discretion

. In addition,

the di strict court’s articulation in response to Alesi’s motion for reconsideration of its reasoning
in denying the motion shows no abuse of discretion. For the foregoing reasons, the district
court’s order denying Alesi ’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,421
<PP&E>                                           4,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (54)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,513
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,137
<SALES>                                          3,698
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,825
<CGS>                                            4,666
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,338
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 382
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,703)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,703)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  9,199
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,496
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.78


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.0



                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Armatron International, Inc.:



      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements on Form S-3 (SEC File No. 2-80846 and SEC File No. 2-80950) and 
in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 2-80846) of Armatron 
International, Inc. of our reports dated November 30, 1998 on our audit of 
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of 
Armatron International, Inc. as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and for the 
years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 which report is included in this 
Annual Report on Form 10-K.




Needham, Massachusetts                 R. J. GOLD & COMPANY P.C.
November 30, 1998