alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-12-00163- CV
Jam es E. Sm ith, in his O ff icial Capacity as Sup erinte ndent of the Nor th Texas State Hospi tal, Ver non Campus; and the Texas Departm ent of State Health Service s, Appellan ts v. Kim ani B utler, Appellee
F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 403 RD JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -DC- 11- 9040 33, H ONO RAB LE B RENDA KENNEDY , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A ND U M O PI N I O N Appellants J ames E. Smith, in his Offic ial Capac ity as Superintendent of the North Texas State Hospital, Ver

non Campus; and the Texas Depa rtment of State Hea lth Service s no longe r wish to pursue their appeal an d have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss . Appellants’ counsel states that she has confe rre d with counsel for the State of Texas and counsel for Kimani Butler , who do not oppose this moti on. We grant the motion and dismiss the appea l. Tex. R . App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________ J eff Rose, Justice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Rose Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: May

18, 2012
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









(1)
The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.










|/s/ Leo P. DenaultLeo P. Denault
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:	March 9, 2004
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Elwood Shepard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 15, 2003                                                 By: /s/ Elwood Shepard

Elwood Shepard, Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3100 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of 

a hydroelectric project involving the Little Wood River Ranch. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2010 

Mr. RISCH (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of 

construction of a hydroelectric project involving the Little 

Wood River Ranch. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY 

4 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT IN5 VOLVING LITTLE WOOD RIVER RANCH. 

6 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 

7 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

8 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com9 mission project numbered 12063, the Federal Energy 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3100 IS

1 Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the li2 censee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in 

3 accordance with the procedures of the Commission under 

4 that section— 

5 (1) extend the time period during which the li6 censee is required to commence the construction of 

7 project works to the end of the 3-year period begin8 ning on the date of enactment of this Act; or 

9 (2) if the license for Project No. 12063 has 

10 been terminated, reinstate the license and extend the 

11 time period during which the licensee is required to 

12 commence the construction of project works to the 

13 end of the 3-year period beginning on the date of en14 actment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000823610
<NAME>                        Rancon Pacific Realty, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,358
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       54
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,582
<PP&E>                                          42,694
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,704)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              430
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,142
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,311
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,821
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     21
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 21
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        22
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### DE GAETANO v. FRANK A. CLENDANIEL, Inc. et al.

Civ. A. No. 1545.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

Nov. 27, 1953.

Albert L. Simon and Stephen E. Hamilton, Jr., Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

William Prickett, Wilmington, Del., for defendants.

LEAHY, District Judge.

This is an action for damages arising out of an automobile collision. Defendants served interrogatories on plaintiff. Interrogatory 3 reads:

> “Give the names and addresses of persons from whom statements have been procured in regard to the facts alleged in the complaint.”

> Plaintiff’s answer was:

> “Thomas Goldsberry U. S. M.C. Naval Hospital Philadelphia, Pa.”

Defendants move under F.R. 34 to compel plaintiff to produce this statement of Goldsberry. The motion states this statement is in possession of plaintiff, contains evidence of plaintiff’s negligence, and is not privileged.

1. A party seeking production under F.R. 34 must show “good cause therefor”.1 What constitutes good cause has no general answer but depends on the facts of each case. There must be, however, a substantial showing of good cause.2

*1152. Defendants rely on Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Julian, D.C.Del., 10 F.R.D. 452. The facts of that case are different from those present in the case at bar. The conclusion is good cause has not been shown, here, and defendants’ motion for production should be denied.

1

. 28 U.S.C.A. 4 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2nd Ed., § 34.08; Alltmont v. U. S. 3 Cir., 177 F.2d 971.

2

. Dellameo v. Great Lakes S. S. Co., D.C. Ohio, 9 F.R.D. 77; Grogan v. Pennsylvania R. Co., D.C.N.Y., 11 F.R.D. 342; McDonald v. Pennsylvania R. Co., D.C., 15 F.R.D. 145; Bonefond v. Borden Co., D.C.N.Y., 12 F.R.D. 183; Gajowski v. Empie, D.C.N.Y., 11 F.R.D. 60.
**Exhibit 32.1****Section 1350 Certification**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of NextelCommunications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Timothy M. Donahue, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to18 U.S.C.§ 1350 (as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that, to thebest of my knowledge:     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     (2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.Date: May 10, 2005     /s/ Timothy M. Donahue         _______________________________________
97-402.

#### Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos.

Montgomery App. No. 15865. Discretionary appeal allowed; *sua sponte,*cause consolidated with 97-551, *supra.*

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

** **

**SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF ANACOMP, INC.**

 
| **Name**         |   | **State or  Country of  Incorporation** |   | **Percentage  of Voting  Securities Owned *** |   |
|------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|             |   |                                    |   |                                          |   |
| Anacomp,  GmbH   |   | Germany                                 |   | 100                                           | %      |
| Anacomp  Limited |   | United  Kingdom                         |   | 100                                           | %      |
| Anacomp,  S.A.   |   | France                                  |   | 100                                           | %      |
|             |   |                                    |   |                                          |   |
|             |   |                                    |   |                                          |   |

----

| *  Directly or indirectly |   |   |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2607 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2607

   To amend the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related 
  Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 to repeal a provision of that Act 
                relating to geothermal energy receipts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related 
  Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 to repeal a provision of that Act 
                relating to geothermal energy receipts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY RECEIPTS PROVISION.

    Section 423 of the Department of the Interior, Environment, and 
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32(c)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,





|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.









|/s/ Hugh T. McDonaldHugh T. McDonald
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer 
of Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	February 27, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,496]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 5, 2009, in response to a petition filed by the union on behalf of workers at Ovonic Energy Products, Inc., Springboro, Ohio.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of May 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13444 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### CALICO BRAND, INC. and Honson Marketing Group, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERITEK IMPORTS, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant, and ACME International Enterprises, Inc., Defendant-Cross Appellant.

Nos. 2008-1324, 2008-1325, 2008-1341.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 4, 2011.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Calico Brand, Inc. and Honson Marketing Group, Inc. (Calico) move to lift the stay of proceedings and set a briefing schedule with respect to its claims against Acme International Enterprises, Inc. Acme responds and “takes no position” on the motion.

These appeals were stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362 upon the filing of Ameri-tek Imports, Inc.’s bankruptcy petition. Calico asserts that the appeals with respect to Acme should proceed. The court notes that it has not received a recent status report from Ameritek regarding the status of the bankruptcy proceedings following the status report received on September 28, 2010. A status report was due in December of 2010. It appears from a review of the bankruptcy court docket that proceedings before that court may be completed.

Accordingly,

It Is ORDERED That:

(1) Ameritek is directed to file a status report in 2008-1324, -1325 within 14 days concerning the status of the bankruptcy proceeding. If this court does not receive a status report, Ameritek’s cross-appeal, 2008-1325, will be dismissed, the stay of the briefing schedule will be lifted, Calico’s opening brief will be due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order, and 2008-1324, -1341 will proceed.

(2) The motion is denied without prejudice to renewal.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13446]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,571]


Chrysler LLC, Warren Office Building, Warren, MI; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 12, 2009, in response to a 
petition filed on behalf of workers at Chrysler LLC, Warren Office 
Building, Warren, Michigan. The workers at the subject facility are 
engaged in activities related to the production of motor vehicles and 
parts.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 5th day of May 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13446 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2906 

AN ACT 

To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to modify a provision 

relating to leases involving certain Indian tribes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2906 ES

1 SECTION 1. LEASES INVOLVING CERTAIN INDIAN TRIBES. 

2 The first section of the Act of August 9, 1955 (25 

3 U.S.C. 415), is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (a), in the second sentence, by 

5 inserting ‘‘and land held in trust for the Kalispel 

6 Tribe of Indians, the Puyallup Tribe of Indians,’’ 

7 after ‘‘the Kalispel Indian Reservation’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘, the Puy9 allup Tribe of Indians, the Swinomish Indian Tribal 

10 Community, or the Kalispel Tribe of Indians’’ after 

11 ‘‘Tulalip Tribes’’. 

Passed the Senate September 22, 2010. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2906 

AN ACT 

To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to modify a 

dian tribes. provision relating to leases involving certain In-
Document

Exhibit 10.7

QuidelOrtho Corporation
Restricted Stock Unit Award Grant Notice
(Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan)
Pursuant to Section 6.10 of the QuidelOrtho Corporation Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), QuidelOrtho Corporation (the “Company”) hereby awards to you a performance-based Restricted Stock Unit Award covering the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock set forth below (the “Award”).  This Award will be evidenced by this Grant Notice and the attached Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms and Conditions (the “Terms and Conditions”). 
Recipient:                    
Date of Grant:                
Number of Shares Subject to Award:                    


Vesting and Settlement:  Subject to the applicable tax withholding requirements, the Restricted Stock Units will vest and be delivered at the time set forth on Exhibit A.


Additional Terms/Acknowledgements:  The undersigned acknowledges receipt of, and understands and agrees to, this Restricted Stock Unit Award Grant Notice, the Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms and Conditions, the Plan and the Plan Prospectus.  You further acknowledge that as of the Date of Grant, this Restricted Stock Unit Award Grant Notice, the Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms and Conditions, the Plan and the Plan Prospectus set forth the entire understanding between the Company and you regarding the acquisition of shares of Common Stock of the Company and supersede all prior oral and written agreements on that subject with the exception of Awards previously granted and delivered to you under the Plan.  You further acknowledge that there may be adverse tax consequences upon the vesting or settlement of the Restricted Stock Units or disposition of the underlying shares and that you have been advised to consult a tax advisor prior to such vesting, settlement or disposition.
QuidelOrtho Corporation    Recipient:
By:             
    Signature    Signature
Title:             Date:     
Date:    
Attachments/Incorporated by Reference:     Restricted Stock Unit Award Terms and Conditions and Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan












Exhibit A
VESTING SCHEDULE


Subject to your continued employment, the performance-based restricted stock units will vest as follows:


[Insert vesting schedule]
#### In the Matter of David Dale, Appellant, v Christopher J. Burns, Justice of the Supreme Court, et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 22, 2013;

decided June 11, 2013

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.