alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Shawn Green, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[976 NYS2d 332]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging 15 administrative determinations, including two disciplinary determinations and 13 grievances. Supreme Court granted respondent’s motion to sever the proceedings into separate claims and, finding an issue of substantial evidence in the matter before us, transferred the instant proceeding to this Court.

Initially, given the obvious confusion and lack of common questions of law and fact among individual claims, we find no clear abuse of discretion in Supreme Court’s decision to sever the claims and consider the determinations separately *(see*CPLR 407; *see also Matter of Abreu v Parrish,*101 AD3d 1184, 1184 [2012]). Turning to the merits, we are unpersuaded by petitioner’s contention that the misbehavior report was not sufficiently detailed in order to apprise him of the charges and precluded him from preparing an adequate defense *(see Matter of Walker v Fischer,*107 AD3d 1273, 1273 [2013]). Furthermore, the misbehavior report and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination finding petitioner guilty of violent conduct, creating a disturbance, interfering with an employee, failing to comply with a movement regulation, failing to produce his identification card, mess hall seating violation and disobeying a direct order. We are unpersuaded by petitioner’s contention that he was denied documentary evidence, as the record establishes that no videotape of the incident existed *(see Matter of Hayes v Fischer,*78 AD3d 1396, 1397 [2010]).

*1020Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Rose, J.E, McCarthy, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Docket 18-2009]

                    The                     **Federal Register**                     notice published on May 4, 2009 (74 FR 20459) describing the application by the County of Kern Department of Airports to establish a general-purpose foreign-trade zone at sites in Kern County, California is corrected as follows:                

In paragraph 2, line 19, the correct acreage for Site 2 is 247 acres and for line 24, the correct site is Site 23.

Dated: June 3, 2009.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-13616 Filed 6-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2701 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phosphinic acid, diethyl- 

, aluminum salt with synergists and encapsulating agents. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phosphinic 

acid, diethyl-, aluminum salt with synergists and encapsulating agents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHINIC ACID, DIETHYL-, ALUMINUM SALT 

4 WITH SYNERGISTS AND ENCAPSULATING 

5 AGENTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.43 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 Phosphinic acid, diethyl-, aluminum salt with synergists 

9 and encapsulating agents) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

10 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2701 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, P. Bruce Camacho, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Union Security Insurance Company; 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 9, 2007
96-2133.

#### In re Belock.

IT IS ORDERED by this court, sita *sponte,*effective May 7,1997, that Dale John Belock, Attorney Registration No. 0031806, last known address in Cleveland, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of October 18, 1996, to wit: failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before November 18,1996.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Elwood Shepard, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: October 13, 2010  /s/ Elwood Shepard Elwood Shepard President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. and will be retained by Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 108 (Monday, June 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13244]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Form 13285-A; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to a notice and request 
for comments that was published in the Federal Register on Friday, May 
29, 2009 at 74 FR 25811 inviting the general public and other Federal 
Agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or 
continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the forms and instructions should be directed to Allan 
Hopkins, (202) 622-6665, or at Internal Revenue Service, Room 6129, 
1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, or through the 
internet, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b3a17171a1555365533140b101215083b120908551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="16577a7a7778385b385e79667d7f7865567f646538717960">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The notice and request for comments that is the subject of this 
correction is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public 
Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).

Need for Correction

    As published, the notice and request for comments for Proposed 
Collection; Comment Request for Form 13285-A contains an error that may 
prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the notice and request for comments 
for Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Form 13285-A, which was 
the subject of FR Doc. E9-12465, is corrected as follows:
    On page 25811, column 2, under the caption DATES:, line 2, the 
language ``received on or before June 19, 2006 to'' is corrected to 
read ``received on or before July 30, 2009 to''.

LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. E9-13244 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of Amerriah S. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Chris S., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (And Two Other Proceedings.)

Submitted January 7, 2013;

decided April 2, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Appellate Division order sought to be appealed from, affirming the Family Court fact-finding order, does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. The final paper in this proceeding was the Family Court dispositional order.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3171 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the approval of 

certain programs of education for purposes of the Post-9/11 Educational 

Assistance Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2010 

Mrs. LINCOLN (for herself and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

approval of certain programs of education for purposes 

of the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Training 

5 Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3171 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPROVAL OF CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL INSTITU2 TIONS FOR PURPOSES OF THE POST-9/11 EDU3 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 

4 Subsection (b) of section 3313 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(b) APPROVED PROGRAMS OF EDUCATION.—A pro7 gram of education is an approved program of education 

8 for purposes of this chapter if the program of education 

9 is approved for purposes of chapter 30 of this title (includ10 ing approval by the State approving agency concerned) 

11 and— 

12 ‘‘(1) the program of education is offered by an 

13 institution offering postsecondary level academic in14 struction that leads to an associate or higher degree 

15 and such institution is an institution of higher learn16 ing (as that term is defined in section 3452(f) of 

17 this title); or 

18 ‘‘(2) the program of education is offered by an 

19 institution offering instruction that does not lead to 

20 an associate or higher degree and such institution is 

21 an educational institution (as that term is defined in 

22 section 3452(c) of this title).’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Brian BEAR HEELS, Appellant.

No. 05-3294.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 20, 2006.

Filed: Oct. 31, 2006.

Randolph John Seiler, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pierre, SD, Mark Edward Salter, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Sioux Falls, SD, for Appellee.

Wade A. Reimers, Olinger & Lovald, Pierre, SD, Federal Correctional Institution, Florence, CO, for Appellant.

Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Brian Bear Heels appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he plead*755ed guilty to second degree murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153, 1111, and 2. His counsel has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Bear Heels objects to counsel’s request to withdraw.

Bear Heels’s plea agreement contains a valid appeal waiver. *See United States v. Andis,*333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir.2003) (en banc) (discussing enforceability of appeal waiver); *see also United States v. Estrada-Bahena,*201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in *Anders*case). Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to *Pen-son v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), for any nonfrivo-lous issues not covered by the appeal waiver, we find none. Accordingly, we enforce the waiver, and dismiss the appeal. We also grant counsel leave to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Entergy
Gulf States' financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000044570
<NAME> ENTERGY GULF STATES INC.
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER> 006
   <NAME> ENTERGY GULF STATES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,627,894
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     80,341
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         728,335
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       994,878
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,431,448
<COMMON>                                       114,055
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    1,152,689
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            325,312
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,728,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           77,459
<PREFERRED>                                    136,444
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,915,346
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  160,865
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     83,524
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                39,110
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,426,644
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,431,448
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,019,181
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           102,091
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,607,283
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,607,283
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        411,898
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            (122,039)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 289,859
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       191,655
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,887)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     28,505
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  (32,392)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         322,355
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
97-215.

#### State ex rel. Feher v. Belmont Cty. Court of Common Pleas.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent and on motion for judgment on pleadings. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the ACompany@) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Elwood Shepard, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: October 31, 2007 By: /s/  Elwood Shepard Elwood Shepard Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

RICHARD JENNINGS , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 609

[ August 5, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 5 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr.

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 1774

- CF

- 10A

.
Richard Jennings, Bristol, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C ONNER , C.J., L EVINE and K LIN GENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32(h)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.





|/s/ Jay A. LewisJay A. Lewis
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Entergy Louisiana, LLC
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	February 28, 2008