alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; ARRA Supplement Applications.                    

*Date:*                         July 22, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         D. G. PATEL, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 756, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7682,                         *pateldg@niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, HS)

Dated: June 1, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-13288 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Westlund,
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
      best
      of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Steven Westlund


Steven
      Westlund


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      17, 2007
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In Re: Darlene M. Lay :

:

v. :

:

County of Erie Tax Claim Bureau :

:

v. :

:

Daniel Bolla, as Executor of the :

Estate of Lawrence C. Bolla, : No. 652 C.D. 2021

Appellant :

:

:

In Re: :

:

Darlene M. Lay :

:

v. :

:

County of Erie Tax Claim Bureau :

:

v. :

:

Daniel Bolla, as Executor of the :

Estate of Lawrence C. Bolla :

:

Appeal of: County of Erie Tax : No. 653 C.D. 2021

Claim Bureau : Submitted: February 7, 2022

AMENDING ORDER

AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2022, the tenth sentence of the first 

full paragraph of the eighth page of the slip memorandum opinion in the abovematter, filed March 2, 2022, is amended to reflect the following correction (deleting 
text inadvertently included in a quotation from the trial court’s Opinion of the Court 

filed May 12, 2021):

This matter hinges, however, on the additional 

requirement contained in Section 601(a)(3) of the RETSL 

that the Bureau personally serve an “owner-occupant” of 

a property subject to an upset sale with notice of that sale. 

The RETSL defines “owner-occupant” as “the owner of a 

property which has improvements constructed thereon and 

for which the annual tax bill is mailed to an owner residing 

at the same address as that of the property.” Section 102 

of the RETSL, 72 P.S. § 5860.102. As the trial court 

observed, the plain text of this definition “contains four 

necessary elements: (1) an owner-occupant must be an 

owner of the property; (2) the property must have 

improvements constructed thereon; (3) the annual tax bill 

for the that property must be mailed to an owner at the 

property; and (4) such owner referenced in prong three 

must reside at the property.” Trial Court Opinion at 29; 

see also Commonwealth v. Giulian, 141 A.3d 1262, 1267 

(Pa. 2016) (“A statute’s plain language generally provides 

the best indication of legislative intent.”).

__________________________________

CHRISTINE FIZZANO CANNON, Judge
Comments from Rose Soulier, Chairperson, Red Cliff Tribe 

1. 514- Fees I would suggest that we change from calendar year to fiscal year for 

the fee payments to NIGC. 

2. Definition I would like to see NIGC have the same definition as the GAAP for 

the following term “Gross Gaming Revenue”. 

3. Notice of Violation: (NOV) for submitting fees late I feel this term or title is 

inappropriate and only should be use if there is gross negligence, and the NIGC 

could consider a ticket system in lieu of a NOV. Also a NOV could lead to closure 

of the gaming facility.
Order entered October 31 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00975

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

JOHN FLANAGAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12

- 23858

- V



### O RDER

The clerk’s record is overdue in this State’s appeal. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS

the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of

this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6705

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ENERVA W. TROTMAN, a/k/a Charles Carlos Clark , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. ( 4:91

- cr - 00092

- M

- 1 )

Submitted : January 31, 2023 Decided: February 2, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Enerva W. Trotman , Appellant Pro Se. Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant U nited States Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6705 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/02/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Enerva W. Trotman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion s for a sentence reduction and compassionate rel ease , challenging only the denial of his compassionate release request

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Trotman , No. 4:91

- cr - 00092

- M

- 1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 2022) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6705 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/02/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
{"agency":"NIGC","generated":"2019-07-30 14:08:04","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"}],"value":"2019"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["NIGC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["13"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["12"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2019","quarter":"Q3"}
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ARAMARK Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, L. Frederick Sutherland, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 15, 2008



/s/    L. FREDERICK SUTHERLANDL. Frederick Sutherland Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of WNC  CALIFORNIA  HOUSING
     TAX CREDITS III, L.P.;

2.   Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information included in this annual report,  fairly present in all material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I are  responsible  for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     (a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     (b)  evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c)  presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based on
     our most recent  evaluation,  to the  registrant's  auditors  and the audit
     committee of  registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing  the
     equivalent function):

     (a)  all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     (b)  any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

Date:  November 8, 2005




         /s/  Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
         ---------------------------

         [Signature]

         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
97-575.

#### Dewey v. Ghee.

On motion for temporary restraining order and on motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
August 30, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LEWIN E. BEARD, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00606-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and 

having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment 

requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is capable 

of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is REFORMED, to read as 

follows: The judge found true paragraph numbers 1, 4, 13, 16, 26, and 35.

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 24






INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration No.
33-49683 of Atlantic Energy, Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration
Nos. 33-53511, 333-11683, and 333-07745 of Atlantic Energy, Inc.
on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-06625 of Atlantic
City Electric Company and Atlantic Capital 1 on Form S-3 and
Registration No. 333-18843 of Conectiv, Inc. on Form S-4 of our
reports dated February 7, 1997 appearing in this Annual Report of
Form 10-K of Atlantic Energy, Inc. and Atlantic City Electric
Company for the year ended December 31, 1996.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
March 14, 1997
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIGIA MARIA GUZMAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-70353

Agency No. A075-581-260

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 

Ligia Maria Guzman, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision finding her removable for participating in alien

smuggling. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

FILED

JUN 09 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 06-70353

claims of due process violations, Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107

(9th Cir. 2003), and review for substantial evidence the agency’s findings of fact,

Urzua Covarrubias v. Gonzales, 487 F.3d 742, 744 (9th Cir. 2007). We deny the

petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Guzman

participated in alien smuggling where the record contains Guzman’s sworn

statement admitting she knew the birth certificate she presented to the immigration

officer did not belong to the passenger in her vehicle. See id. at 744. 

The determination that Guzman’s sworn statement was not coerced is also

supported by substantial evidence. See Cuevas-Ortega v. INS, 588 F.2d 1274,

1278 (9th Cir. 1979) (“the bare assertion that a statement is involuntary is

insufficient” to prove coercion); see also Espinoza v. INS, 45 F.3d 308, 310 (9th

Cir. 1995) (“The burden of establishing a basis for exclusion of evidence from a

government record falls on the opponent of the evidence, who must come forward

with enough negative factors to persuade the court not to admit it.”)

Guzman’s due process rights were not violated by the admission of the

smuggled alien’s Form I-213 because the form was probative and its admission

was fundamentally fair. See id. at 310 (noting that “[t]he sole test for admission of

evidence [in a deportation proceeding] is whether the evidence is probative and its
3 06-70353

admission is fundamentally fair,” and rejecting the argument that a Form I-213 was

inadmissible as hearsay). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### Mark D. HUGHES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roy COOPER, North Carolina Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-7191.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 7, 2006.

*247Mark D. Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Mark D. Hughes seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hughes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              44
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    44
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,430
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,660
<OTHER-SE>                                    (158,046)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        44
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (593)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (593)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>