alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

 

1Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(ii).

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-21106

Summary Calendar

JEANNENE MEINECKE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

H & R BLOCK OF HOUSTON, a general

partnership; ADMINISTAFF,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(H-94-CV-19)

May 29, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JONES and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

JeanneneMeinecke suedH&RBlockandAdministaff, herformer employers, alleging

age and sex discrimination and breach of contract. On March 13, 1994 the parties filed a

stipulation declaring that all claims against Administaff and the breach of contract claims

againstH&RBlockwould be dismissedvoluntarily.1 Several days later, however, the district

court granted the defendantssummaryjudgment and dismissed all of Meinecke’s claimswith
 

2Meinecke v. H&R Block of Houston, 66 F.3d 77 (5th Cir. 1995).

 

3

Id. at 84.

 

4We would merely note that our prior opinion observed that the claims subsequently

included in the amended judgment were dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(ii).

This rule provides in pertinent part:

Unless otherwise stated in the notice of dismissal or stipulation, the dismissal is

without prejudice, except that a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication upon

the merits when filed by a plaintiff who has once dismissed in any court of the United

States or of any state an action based on or including the same claim.

2

prejudice.

On direct appeal we reversed the grant of summary judgment as to those claims

included in the antecedent voluntary dismissal,2remanding with instructionsthat the district

court “reform the judgment to reflect the dismissal of all claims against Administaff and the

breach of contract claims against H&R Block.”3 On November 22, 1995 the district court

entered the following Amended Final Judgment:

Pursuant to the judgment and mandate of the Court of Appeals, this

court dismisses all claims against Administaff and the breach of contract

claims against H&R Block.

This is a FINAL JUDGMENT.

Meinecke now appeals, contending that the inclusion of the phrase “Thisis a FINAL

JUDGMENT” is a departure from this court’s mandate insofar as it obscures whether the

judgment is with or without prejudice. This argument is specious. The district court’s

“Amended FinalJudgment” is correctly termed a “final judgment” because it endsthe instant

litigation. What Meinecke in fact seeks, but may not secure through the medium of this

appeal, is an advisory opinion concerning the judgment’s preclusive effect in the event she

refiles the voluntarily dismissed claims.4

Appeal DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our  report  included  in this Form  10-Q,  into  NIPSCO  Industries,  Inc.'s
previously  filed  Form  S-8  Registration  Statement  No.  33-30619;  Form  S-8
Registration  Statement  No.  33-30621;  Forms S-8  Registration  Statement  No.
333-08263;  Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-19981; Form S-8 Registration
Statement No. 333-19983; Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-19985; Form S-8
Registration  Statement  No.  333-59151;  Form S-8  Registration  Statement  No.
333-59153;  Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-22347; Form S-3 Registration
Statement No. 333-26847; Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-39911, and Form
S-4A Registration Statement No. 333-50537.


                           /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Chicago, Illinois
August   , 1998
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41039 Conference Calendar

JEFFERY ELGIN CRUMEDY, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:95-CV-438

- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Jeffery Elgin Crumedy, Texas prisoner # 612356, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition seeking credit towards his federal sentence for time served in state custody. The petition was proper under § 2241 because Crumedy is challenging the execution of his federal sentence. See United States v. Cleto , 956 F.2d 83, 84 (5th Cir. 1992). Because his petition was filed before the enactment of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, neither a certificate of probable cause nor aNo. 97-41039 -2- certificate of appealability is required. See Green v. Johnson , 116 F.3d 1115, 1119-20 (5th Cir. 1997); Ojo v. INS , 106 F.3d 680, 681-82 (5th Cir. 1997). Crumedy is, however, required to exhaust administrative remedies before proceeding. See United States v. Wilson , 503 U.S. 329, 335 (1992); United States v. Dowling , 962 F.2d 390, 393 (5th Cir. 1992). The Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) determined that Crumedy’s claim was premature because it will not calculate Crumedy’s sentence, including any credit for time served, until he reports for federal custody. See Wilson , 503 U.S. at 334-35. Since his sentence has not yet been calculated, Crumedy’s § 2241 petition is likewise premature. Additionally, his claim for credit appears to be without merit on its face. See Savage v. Henderson , 475 F.2d 78, 79 (5th Cir. 1973). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,907
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         10,840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,502
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,057
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,650
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (297)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    141
<INCOME-TAX>                                        19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                122
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       122
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          94,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,099
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,502
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,674
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (23,064)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (23,064)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (23,064)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>
Not presented since all shares of common stock are held by a sole
shareholder.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(f)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.





/s/ Carolyn C. Shanks                            		Carolyn C. Shanks
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.


Date:	March 9, 2005
#### Joseph L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry BROWN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-1560.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2006.

Decided June 5, 2006.

Rehearing Denied July 12, 2006.

Joseph L. Williams, Miami Correctional Facility, Bunker Hill, IN, pro se.

Robert J. Palmer, May, Oberfell & Lorber, South Bend, IN, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, and Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

We remanded the dismissal of this prisoner’s civil rights case insofar as it charged one of the defendants, Nurse Brown, with reckless disregard of the plaintiffs medical condition (a rectal abscess). On remand, the district judge correctly found that there was no evidence of anything more than honest disagreement over the best way of treating the plaintiffs condition, and therefore the judge granted summary judgment for Brown.

AFFIRMED.
Yational Indian Gaming Commission 

. ,, . . . ~x . C:'::CI?ICT: :'I~T*:uTs~cR! : ~lcrcerncnt) is rr.rsrc2 +I ant: Ir.:ir c:.~. rb2 . . - 

: .:Jnin:: !-~5~ I .J'f5~'!. E !:>ier?,!&-p:~ncni~od Indian r5hc. md Chak:::;:r: ' !.!?:: * - 

'iz:ic~nn! ir~ilinr, tixming it!rnr~_ission i\!C;C Chairman k. rr.la?ing ::;t. ,::::::i.r :-:r?:;!i:::.. . . -.: , -..:I S[T:C ";i?zi7ag's Noticr. of l'ioiatjon No. 3~\'-?3-~~~. 

I. lI'!?r.rc:1s. E!!C II?L!~L~ Gi?~i?p Rcgulston. .-w 1 iCiIC.2.) nu!l?orize~ r::.: Y:rfC' . ., - r,'!l.:~i=~~ It1 i.%t;ur. cr7::: : IEC~ firr \.icr':~~ions nfthr IGR;?. Ss?io~r: i i 7i!i217 C !:r?: in c 

T sit \I GC' i r~guimioas. or titibal scguIatior?s, OT<!~~I?C<?. .,\r -2~: \11!:;~11.: . . . , 1-. I-. l 1: , . ::r7ni~ . . 2; :-\ !he SIC;C C'llaimm under 75 I '.S.C . : 5 - I. - , -. ... .\. . : -937 . + .- ,!;:' . 8 . 
-. : r'. 'l3c '' :b: agxcs ?hat the f~ilurc [n submit quancr!? .i:rr:cr?ec:+ a?.: !'::i . :r .:. 

gaming oyrrat ionts J ir! a ri~el!' :xs!~ion is 3 -, io!n~ion o'XTT.!-' rt.c::ir!- .on3. 

~ ! . . T,~ " .. ~~~3~,..,.,T.,,~~~., .- - ,.,.--- I ?a: 2 civi! !int of four thr>usnnd sever! hu~r!~=c' .ii!i!:!rs .,i.. 

.. m::dr. paya:?;~ 1112 t:.s. .l'rufl?;~q' 3n2 :rj ;!?;- Y i{ i'-, ':.IT L, 

,. . -.- ~~;~~~~nn~ :!y2t: IlunGr.:d agd :;tfy Jo!lars ('32,75f! I c~-'*I-. ..:- ':-a, . .... it:z:: . :- - . .. ..., ..+ 17 :;:- ,.:-- 

:\11fl.> i 1 I ri:?ys zfi:.: FIf'ft.cSp: napc of T?:!:: ,\grp<r?.cn:. 

. . -. ' I-:* r.h%Y..,lp,?k, ,.A ., -7 -. . .., . , ..., ..,.., . . .:.ol;sz~d ??rec hundred snc! :l$* doliars t 52.' 5 .sv!!! bc ' . . . *. *. S.!<?,l?,' ... *.r.r -< 

. <. , ..,, ,>, . .L:rtg :!:ncT~. su!vnlssror! o!' rhc quarterly ~xLcTc-.:.< 2:':' . :': 

?..a . . .--,:,-. .. .,... 3 - :::ir -!?r. .:uarxr endiag !Uarch .: 1. 701:19. I<;hi. :!!::r:c:'~ ~:::::.-7:~11": :!:-;i , - . .+. . ~ 

4LL,2 ' -:,. . - T-- .. .< .*? ..,> . 2~ :!o: ~r.53it:~;. :\YO :$nusagti :I?TL': ~:I~;'TL.: 27.: :: : : .::* :I-:: ". 

.-- . b-.: > : ~vii: becolr~e ?z>ablc ..t?ril 70. 21iJ?9. 

17 . ,- 13: 2!7;~.ring :?:s .lgr::i.z', :kt S\;IGU C'hnim-la> Zgrccs Ill u rl!cc ,::s rig!.: ID .. . 

~m~t~sc adJ{ij~!i2: :i\-ii fiat. ;1 clnsur~ OTJCT ~gninsr '!-ri:?~ :-L?T C!:C ~!::!:!<:i 

. . ?;i,:rcqsc2 ty \ (?'\*-i-iX-?9. prOvidcd th2r if the .l'rjhc :;?il.; :(: ~p?r.!? %-. ::.: !?i< 

'<.T- .,..'?.ry' ... L 

. ,: c,. .,,. ... N!I&' c'hairman may issue a prr~po~eii ci\,ii :-:c := -:c,,ji:.;. 'I--' 

-7- . . : r: x's \.iolxrir~n ~12. irr hr-ac!: o? tI?is :2grcernr~'.. 

/, ' 1 5, I'!.ris \gyetmcgf coas:i:urt5 132 cztire agcrn?e!l? ?c!\\ th~ t .' !!2i !??::!I . . .~q> +hc 'I'Fhe rr~!ating to r!:c c.!lfnrcr.rr.c.tl? ?nzllcr .wl ?i>fl!! :?I !h~ :kg!?"'!?:! i11':T?t.c: 

*lgpi.:~i.r:. 1r.l. :rrt~diflc3'lion or i~1jv.e~ nf an) ttm o!'~hi!: -\ETL'~:--,:~: :fl::S' 'Y - . . I:: \r.r::::g mJ signed hy 30th parries,
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13639]



[[Page 27551]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuances

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 
U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to 
the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         License No.              Name/address          Date reissued
------------------------------------------------------------------------
001593F.....................  Robertson Forwarding  May 10, 2009.
                               Co., Inc., 4469 NW
                               97th Ave., Miami,
                               FL 33178.
013172N.....................  Yung Hoon Kim, dba    May 6, 2009.
                               Conex
                               International,
                               20695 South Western
                               Ave., Suite 136,
                               Torrance, CA 90501.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. E9-13639 Filed 6-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Document

Exhibit 10.3


AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENTS
The holder listed below (“Participant”) and TransDigm Group Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby enter into this Amendment to Option Agreements as of July __, 2022.  
Participant and Company are parties to one or more Stock Option Agreements as listed below (the “Option Agreements”) pursuant to the Company’s 2007 Stock Incentive Plan and/or the Company’s 2014 Stock Option Plan (each, a “Plan”), whereby Participant was granted options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 (“Stock”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the applicable Option Agreement.


						
	Date of Grant	Number of Shares Underlying Options Outstanding as of the Date Hereof
		
		
		
		


 
The Company and Participant would like to amend the Option Agreements by adding the following paragraph to said Option Agreement:
“Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Option Agreement, the Plan or any applicable plan providing for cash dividend equivalent rights, if an extraordinary dividend is declared on the Stock following the date of this Amendment and if the holders of Options of the Company generally are entitled to receive dividend equivalent payments with respect thereto, then the exercise price of the Option shall be reduced by the amount per share of such extraordinary dividend; provided, however, that if as a result of the foregoing reduction, the exercise price would be below zero, then this provision will apply only to the extent the exercise price would be zero and the remainder of any dividend equivalents related to an extraordinary dividend will be paid in cash.”
No other provisions of the Option Agreements or the Plan or any applicable dividend equivalent plan are amended hereby.
By his or her signature, Participant agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Stock Option Agreement, as modified by this Amendment.  
																											
									
	TRANSDIGM GROUP INCORPORATED				PARTICIPANT
					
	By:
						By:		
	Print Name:		Michael Lisman				Print Name:		
	Title:
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer						
	Address:
		1301 E. 9th St., Suite 3000
Cleveland OH 44114
				Address:
Exhibit 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Anaren, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-36761, No. 333-03193, No. 333-70397, No. 333-70427, No. 333-50390, No.
333-50392, and No. 333-153382) on Form S-8 of Anaren, Inc. of our report dated
September 15, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Anaren,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash
flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2008, which
report appears in the June 30, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Anaren, Inc.

Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to a change in the
accounting for uncertain tax positions in 2008, and changes in the accounting
for defined benefit pensions and other postretirement plans in 2007.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Syracuse, New York
September 14, 2009
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statements (Nos. 333-143232 and 333-143233) on Form S-8 of our report dated November 24, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of AIM SERVICES Co., Ltd. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to (1) that accounting principles generally accepted in Japan vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as discussed
in Note 15 and (2) that the audits also comprehended the translation of Japanese yen amounts into U.S. dollar amounts and such translation has been made in conformity with the basis stated in Note 1) appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of ARAMARK Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended October 1, 2010.



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU LLC
|                                
|Tokyo, Japan                    
|December 14, 2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ARAMARK Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 1, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Neubauer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 16, 2010

/s/    JOSEPH
NEUBAUERJoseph Neubauer Chairman and Chief Executive Officer