alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13462]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,849]


Stimson Lumber Company, Clatskaine, OR; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 24, 2009, in response to a 
petition filed by Woodworkers/IAM Local Lodge W536 on behalf of all 
workers at Stimson Lumber Company, Clatskaine, Oregon.
    The petitioner requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of May 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13462 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                        1000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                   137000
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                     137000
<EQUITIES>                               48684
<MORTGAGE>                               48684
<REAL-ESTATE>                               46
<TOTAL-INVEST>                          198841
<CASH>                                   34306
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                       39287
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                   20398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          351144
<POLICY-LOSSES>                         166649
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                      40093
<POLICY-OTHER>                            4203
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                          51000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                134
<COMMON>                                 24142
<OTHER-SE>                               54672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            351144
<PREMIUMS>                               91292
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      12877
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                        2831
<OTHER-INCOME>                            1172
<BENEFITS>                               77563
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>              11947
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                     31042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           3922
<INCOME-TAX>                             (6988)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      10910
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             10910
<EPS-BASIC>                               0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.46
<RESERVE-OPEN>                           64143
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                      73056
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                         3246
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                       44623
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                         27959
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                          87797
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      0


</TABLE>
# Drill #7

&"Times New Roman,Bold"Spot Fire		&"Times New Roman,Bold"Drill #7

&P	

&P	

# Code Page

# image1.png
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO DOMESTIC

RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES

COMMITTEE :

:

:

:

: NO. 702

CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18 th day of February , 2020, Carolyn Moran Zack, Esquire,

Philadelphia, is hereby appointed as a member of the Domestic Relations Procedural

Rules Committee for a term of five years, commencing April 1, 2020.
EXHIBIT 99.

 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
                                                         CONTACT:  HANK SHAFRAN
                                                            CONE COMMUNICATIONS
                                                                   617-951-8193

                                                       CONTACT:  JAMES F. FAGAN
                                              ARROW AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                                                   508-872-3711


                   ARROW AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES TO STREAMLINE
                PRODUCTION WITH CLOSING OF SANTA MARIA, CA PLANT

            EXPANDED MANUFACTURING IN ARKANSAS FACILITY DESIGNED TO
              IMPROVE OPERATING EFFICIENCIES AND CUSTOMER SERVICE

            AGGRESSIVE RELOCATION PLAN TARGETS CALIFORNIA WORKFORCE


 MORRILTON, AR (SEPTEMBER 26, 1996)- ARROW AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES (ASE: AI), A

 LEADER IN THE AUTOMOTIVE AFTERMARKET SINCE 1929, TODAY ANNOUNCED THAT IT WILL

 BE CLOSING ITS SANTA MARIA, CA PRODUCTION FACILITY.  PRODUCT LINES SERVICED AT

 THE CALIFORNIA FACILITY WILL NOW BE MANUFACTURED AT ARROW'S PRODUCTION

 FACILITY IN MORRILTON, ARKANSAS.  ARROW WILL CONTINUE TO OPERATE A FULLY

 STAFFED, FULL-INVENTORY DISTRIBUTION CENTER IN SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA FOR

 CUSTOMERS IN SEVEN WEST COAST STATES, ALASKA AND HAWAII.  THE COMPANY IS

 OFFERING A RELOCATION PACKAGE TO MANY SANTA MARIA EMPLOYEES AND HOPES THEY

 WILL CHOOSE TO RELOCATE TO ARKANSAS.



 "CONSOLIDATING OPERATIONS AT OUR ARKANSAS FACILITY REPRESENTS A CONTINUATION

 OF OUR EFFORTS TO IMPROVE OPERATING EFFICIENCIES AND CUSTOMER SERVICE," STATED

 JIM OSMENT, ARROW PRESIDENT AND CEO.  "WE WILL CONTINUE TO PRODUCE THE SAME

 HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS OUR CUSTOMERS HAVE COME TO DEPEND ON IN A MORE

 STREAMLINED AND COST-EFFECTIVE MANNER".



 EXHIBIT 99. (CONTINUED)



 SIMILAR CONSOLIDATION EFFORTS HAVE BEEN INSTITUTED THIS YEAR BY ARROW, WITH

 THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTRALIZED CUSTOMER SERVICE, PURCHASING AND BILLING

 OPERATIONS AT THE ARKANSAS OFFICES.  THE COMPANY'S SALES FORCE WILL REMAIN THE

 SAME FOR CUSTOMERS IN THE WEST COAST REGION.



 TO RESPOND TO EMPLOYEE NEEDS, ARROW IS WORKING TO CREATE AN ATTRACTIVE

 RELOCATION PACKAGE WHICH WILL BE OFFERED TO MANY SANTA MARIA EMPLOYEES.  AS AN

 EMPLOYER IN SANTA MARIA, CA SINCE 1981, ARROW WILL ALSO BE WORKING WITH

 SEVERAL JOB TRAINING AND RE-EMPLOYMENT GROUPS IN SANTA MARIA TO PROVIDE

 APPROPRIATE SERVICES TO EMPLOYEES WHO DO NOT RELOCATE.



 ARROW AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, WITH MANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTION CENTERS

 LOCATED IN THE U.S. AND CANADA, IS ONE OF THE LARGEST INDEPENDENT

 REMANUFACTURERS OF REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR DOMESTIC AND IMPORTED VEHICLES.  NOW

 IN ITS 67TH YEAR, ARROW AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES REMAINS A LEADER IN THE

 AUTOMOTIVE AFTERMARKET, WITH CURRENT SALES IN EXCESS OF $100 MILLION ANNUALLY.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 14 (Friday, January 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4210]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. 
The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential 
trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group; Subcommittee J--Population and Patient-Oriented Training.
    Date: February 13, 2009.
    Time: 7:45 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Alexandria Old Town, 1767 King Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314.
    Contact Person: Ilda M. Mckenna, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Research Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 8111, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-7481, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#117c727a747f7f7078517c70787d3f7f78793f767e67"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83eee0e8e6edede2eac3eee2eaefadedeaebade4ecf5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 14, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-1339 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
0 MEANS NOT APPLICABLE OR NOT SEPARATELY DISCLOSED. THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE YEAR THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             447
<SECURITIES>                                     1,051
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,563
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         41,105
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,434
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,268
<SALES>                                          7,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,098
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,086
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,405
<INCOME-TAX>                                       548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                857
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       857
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
For Immediate Release Contact: Shawn Pensoneau 

 (202) 632-7003 

NIGC Announces Tribal Consultation NIGC Announces Tribal Consultation Announces Tribal Consultation 

Washington, DC, December 14, 2010 — The National Indian Gaming Commission 

(Commission) has announced a government-to-government consultation to be held 

January 11, 2011, at the U.S. Grant Hotel in San Diego, California, and January 12, 

2011, at the Cache Creek Resort near Sacramento, California. 

“The Commission places a high priority on consultation. We are eager to engage in a 

meaningful dialogue with tribes as we begin to consider the relevance of the 

Commission’s current regulations for today’s industry and what can be done to improve 

them in order to better protect the industry,” said Chairwoman Stevens. “As the primary 

regulators for the Indian gaming industry, tribes and tribal regulators are uniquely 

positioned to provide the NIGC with relevant information and feedback. We look forward 

to the discussion.” 

A Notice of Inquiry was published in the Federal Register November 18, 2010, notifying 

the public that the Commission is conducting a comprehensive review of all regulations 

promulgated to implement the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA). The NOI 

encourages input regarding which regulations need revision and what process should be 

utilized to revise them. 

This process is consistent with Executive Order 13,175, “Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments,” and reflects the Commission’s commitment to hold 

discussions prior to initiating the rulemaking process and before drafting proposed rules. 

All information on the regulatory review, including the Federal Register notice can be 

found by visiting our website at www.nigc.gov. 

If you have questions or need additional information prior to the meetings, please 

contact Rita Homa, at (202) 632-7003. 

The NIGC is an independent regulatory agency established within the Department of the Interior pursuant 

to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. 

###
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1075

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Tirrell M. Thompson

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

 ____________

Submitted: May 19, 2023

Filed: May 24, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Tirrell Thompson appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he

pleaded guilty to a firearm offense, pursuant to a plea agreement containing an appeal

1The Honorable David Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.
waiver. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable,

and applicable to the issue raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d

702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (validity and applicability of an appeal waiver is reviewed

de novo); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc)

(appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the

defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver,

and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). We have also

independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and

have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal falling outside the scope of the waiver. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal based on the appeal waiver, and we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 13 - 00266 - CR NO. 02 - 13 - 002 91 - CR JOSE ALONSO ARREDOND O APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT CO URT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Pursuant to a plea bargain, Appellant Jose Alonso Arredondo pled guilty to burglary of a habitation and to evading arrest or detention with a vehicl e and pled true to the habitual offender allegations in each case. The trial court followed the plea bargain, convicting Appellant of each offense, entering a deadly weapon finding on the evading arrest or detention with a vehicle judgment, and

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 sentencing him to twenty

- five years’ confinement for each offense, with the sentences to run concurrently. Appellant filed a timely pro se notice of appeal in
each case. For each case, the trial court’s certification states that this is a plea

bargained case , that Appellant has no right of appeal , and that Appellant had waived the right of appeal . Accordingly, we informed Appellant by letter on June 19, 2013 that these cases were subject to dismissal unless he or any party showed grounds for continuing the appeals on or before July 1, 2013. 2 Appellant ’s appointed counsel timely responded, indicating that Appellant’s appeals should be dismissed because the trial court followed the plea bargain
and did not reserve issues for appeal. We therefore dismiss these appeals

. 3

P ER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: August 1, 2013

2 See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 25.2(d).

3 See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Consolidated  Financial  Statements  at March 31, 1997 and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1671
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (87)
<INVENTORY>                                    3313
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4967
<PP&E>                                         1090
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (249)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1394
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       54
<OTHER-SE>                                     3008
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5807
<SALES>                                        14385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14385
<CGS>                                          10814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10814
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                338
<INCOME-TAX>                                   31
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            307
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   307
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY
JUNE 30, 2003


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortis Benefits Insurance
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ Robert B. Pollock
------------------------------
Robert B. Pollock
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2003


                                       15
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis ARREDONDO-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40941

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Luis Arredondo-Perez (Arredondo) appeals his conviction and sentence following his guilty plea to being illegally present in this country subsequent to deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Arredondo challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Arredondo’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Arredondo contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States, v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Arredondo properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GERARD MORRISON and

BARBARA MORRISON

,

Appellant s

,

v.

THE LEGACY REALTY

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00044

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law

of Bastrop County, Texas

(TC# 22

- 21581)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of prosecution. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. It

appearing to this C ourt that Appellants are indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes no

other order with respect thereto. We further order this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2023.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, J.J.
#### Leslie Kahn, Appellant, v New York City Department of Education et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 22, 2011;

decided April 5, 2011

Motion by the New York State United Teachers for leave to file an affirmation amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the affirmation is accepted as filed, and for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted, three copies of the brief to be served and an original and 19 copies filed within 30 days.