alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 32.2


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Angelica Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James W. Shaffer, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
         78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ James W. Shaffer
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       James W. Shaffer
                                       Vice President, Treasurer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer of Angelica
                                       Corporation

                                       April 15, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of American Israeli Paper Mills Limited
(the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned Avi Brener, Active Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1)       
               The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)       
               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                     |                        
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|Date: June 28,  2007 |                        
|                     | /s/ Avi Brener         
|                     |                        
|                     | Avi Brener             
|                     | Chief Executive Officer
CASINO #1 Alverda Drive, Oroville, CA 95966

@ MOORETOWN RANCHERIA
GAMING COMMISSION

Phone: (530) 533-3885 ext. 336. Fax: (530) 533-3653

September 1, 2022
Via Electronic Mail Only

Mr. E, Sequoyah Simermeyer, Chair
National Indian Gaming Commission
1849 C Street, N.W.

Mail Stop # 1621

Washington, D.C. 20040

Email: NIGC.Outreach@nigc.gov

Re: Comments on the NIGC Proposed Regulatory Revisions

Dear Chairman Simermeyer:

Thank you for providing the Mooretown Rancheria Gaming Commission (Commission) an
opportunity to provide written comments to the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) on
the proposed rule changes to 25 CFR Parts 502, 556 and 558, as published in the Federal
Register on August 10, 2022.

First and foremost, the Commission applauds the NIGC efforts to create a meaningful and
respectful consultation program through the implementation of the NIGC Consultation Policy
(NIGC). Government-to-government relationships between tribes and the NIGC is best fostered
through direct, meaningful, and respectful communication which appears to be the goal of the
NIGC Consultation Policy. However, here conducting just two (2) back-to-back virtual
consultations in July of 2021—during a global pandemic—is far less than what should be
provided to tribes on such an important and complex matter. The limited tribal responses
received by the NIGC to date on these matters is further evidence that tribes have not yet had the
ability to fully participate in meaningful consultation with the NIGC on the proposed rule
changes. Additionally, the present narrow 30-day comment period, without further meaningful
in-person or virtual consultation opportunities, does not equate to sufficient tribal consultation on
such significant rule changes.

Unfortunately, we are simply unable to fully vet and address all of our concerns regarding the
draft rule changes prior to the September 9, 2022, comment period deadline. The current
proposed changes are significantly different than the initial proposal, the changes include
numerous undefined terms that will likely cause more confusion than clarity, and the impact of
the proposed changes to tribal gaming ordinances, CJIS compliance, and application to the
numerous tribal-state compacts as a result of the proposed rule changes is confusing at best.


For the reasons outlined above, the Commission respectfully urges the NIGC to consider
conducting further meaningful in person tribal consultations on the proposed changes to 25 CFR
Parts 502, 556 and 558 prior to publishing a final rule. There are numerous nationwide in-person
events scheduled across the country between now and the end of 2022 which the NIGC could
utilize to facilitate more meaningful in-person tribal consultation with respect to the proposed
changes. We are hopeful that further consultations will occur prior to issuance of a final rule.

Please contact me if you have any further questions related to this matter.

Sincerely,

Sharon Arnold, Director of Gaming / Sr. Commissioner
Mooretown Rancheria Tribal Gaming Commission
Please contact the CJIS Audit Unit at cau@nigc.gov with any questions.

Tribal Management Services (TMS) Portal:

Report Types 

Daily Reports - reports sent once daily to this contact which document all transactions of the prior 24 

hours which were facilitated by the Tribe.

Weekly Reports - reports sent once weekly to this contact which document all transactions of the prior 

7 days which were facilitated by the Tribe.

Monthly Reports - reports sent once monthly to this contact which document all transactions of the 

prior month which were facilitated by the Tribe.

Date Version Number CAU Personnel

07.21.23 1.0 McDonald
Exhibit 10.14


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


DECEMBER 22, 2017 LICENSE AGREEMENT


 


THIS First Amendment
to the December 22, 2017 License Agreement ("First Amendment"), effective as of the date last written below (the "Effective
Date"), is made by and between MDNA Life Sciences Inc. ("MDNA") and _____
("_____"). MDNA and _____ may be referred
to herein each as a "Party" or collectively as "Parties."


 


RECITALS


 


A.             MDNA
and _____ entered into a License Agreement having an
effective date of December 22, 2017 (the "Agreement"); and,


 


B.             The Parties
now wish to amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms of this First Amendment.


 


TERMS


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and
valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and the mutual covenants set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows:


 


1.             The definition
of "Commencement Date" in Section 1 of the Agreement 1s hereby amended and restated as follows:


 


"Commencement Date" means the earlier of: (a) three hundred
and thirty (330) days after the Effective Date of this Agreement, or (b) the Commercial Launch Date.


 


2.             MDNA acknowledges
that it has received full payment of the fees under Sections 3.1 and 3.2, as well as the Minimum Annual Royalty for Contract Year 1 under
Sections 3.3 and Exhibit C.


 


3.             All capitalized
terms used in this First Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned them in the Agreement.


 


4.             Except
as expressly stated in this First Amendment, the Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Parties hereto have executed this First Amendment through their authorized representatives signing below.


 


	MDNA LIFE SCIENCES INC.	______________________
	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	By:	 
	 	 	 	 
	Name:	Chris Mitto	Name:	 
	 	 	 	 
	Title:	President & CEO	Title:	CSO and SrVP,
	 	 	 	 
	Date:	May 20, 2019	Date:	05/12/2019


 




    	 	Page 1 of 1
# National Caribbean-American Heritage Month, 2009 

Caribbean Americans have made lasting contributions to our Nation’s culture and history, and the month of June has been set aside to honor their cultural, linguistic, ethnic, and social diversity.

 Generations of immigrants have preserved the traditions of their homelands, and these traditions have defined our Nation’s identity. Caribbean Americans bring a unique and vibrant culture. This multilingual and multiethnic tradition has strengthened our social fabric and enriched the diversity of our Nation.

Millions of individuals in the United States have Caribbean roots. Unfortunately some Caribbean Americans were forced to our country as slaves; others arrived of their own volition. All have sought the promise of a brighter tomorrow for themselves and their children.

 In their pursuit of success, Caribbean Americans exhibit the traits all Americans prize: determination, a devotion to community, and patriotism. They have made their mark in every facet of our society, from art to athletics and science to service. Caribbean Americans have also safeguarded our Nation in the United States Armed Forces.

 This month we also recognize the critical relationship the United States maintains with Caribbean nations. In a world of increasing communication and connectivity, this friendship has become even more important. We are neighbors, partners, and friends; we share the same aspirations for our children; and we strive for the very same freedoms. Together, we can meet the common challenges we face.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2009 as National Caribbean-American Heritage Month. I urge all Americans to commemorate this month by learning more about the history and culture of Caribbean Americans.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this second day of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.

[FR Doc. E9-13410

Billing code 3195-W9-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6549
EDWARD W. JEFFERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OFFICER HAMILTON; SERGEANT HAM, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Paul W. Grimm, Magistrate Judge. (CA-95- 2661-JFM) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: November 4, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward W. Jefferson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order entering judgment upon the jury's verdict in favor of the defendant on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Appellant failed to provide a transcript of the jury trial held on April 3 and 4, 1997. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Powell v. Estelle , 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir. 1992). Moreover, Appellant has failed to state a substantial claim justifying preparation of a transcript at government expense. 28 U.S.C. §753(f) (1994). Consequently, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby denied. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 237 SSM 28 Mary T. Heltz, Appellant, v. Bruce S. Barratt et al., Respondents.

Submitted by Scott R. Hapeman, for appellant. Submitted by Andrew J. Kowalewski, for respondents.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to produce admissible evidence raising a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendant Barratt had an opportunity to avoid the collision. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided December 17, 2014
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHS Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended November 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John D. Johnson,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ John D. Johnson
-----------------------
John D. Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003
# Keno Cash Summary
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1180

FRANCIS PIERRE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Office of the

Attorney General; ARLINGTON COUNTY GENERAL

DISTRICT COURT, The Judges and the Clerk’s

Office; WASHINGTON SHUTTLE, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-02-71-A)

Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 19, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis Pierre, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Francis Pierre appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his attempt to appeal his state action. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Pierre v. Virginia, No. CA-02-71-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
compensationcommitteecon






272536548 v2     1     ACTION BY UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT  OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF   THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF  KRONOS BIO, INC.    The undersigned, constituting all of the members of the Compensation Committee (the  “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of KRONOS BIO, INC., a Delaware corporation (the  “Company”), pursuant to Section 141(f) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, hereby adopt  the following resolutions by unanimous written consent:  SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL PLAN PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT AMENDMENT  WHEREAS, the Committee has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company  and its stockholders to adopt an amended form of Participation Agreement under the Company’s  Severance and Change in Control Plan in order to provide for equity acceleration benefits to C- level employees, in accordance with their employment agreements with the Company.      RESOLVED, that the amended form of Participation Agreement under the Company’s  Severance and Change in Control Plan in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A be,  and it hereby is, adopted and approved in all respects.   GENERAL AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION    RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company be, and each of them hereby is, authorized  and directed, for and on behalf of the Company, to take such actions and execute such documents  as each may deem necessary or appropriate in order to carry out and perform the purposes of the  foregoing resolution, and all actions authorized by this resolution and taken by such officers  prior to the date of this resolution are hereby ratified and approved in all respects.    [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]    DocuSign Envelope ID: FC565EFD-41FA-4C85-9E97-977CE7113865 





 






272536548 v2       2     Each of the undersigned Committee members has signed this Action by Unanimous  Written Consent as of the date set forth across from his or her name below:      DIRECTORS:                   Arie S. Belldegrun, M.D.   Date                     Marianne De Backer, Ph.D.   Date                    Roshawn Blunt    Date    DocuSign Envelope ID: FC565EFD-41FA-4C85-9E97-977CE7113865 7/31/2022 8/2/2022 8/1/2022 





 






272536548 v2            EXHIBIT A    AMENDED FORM OF PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT UNDER   SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL PLAN      DocuSign Envelope ID: FC565EFD-41FA-4C85-9E97-977CE7113865
#### SEABOARD MACHINERY CORP. et al. v. SEABOARD MACHINERY CORP. et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Aug. 25, 1953.

Fischbach *&*Crowe, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Samuel B. Ohlbaum, New York City, for defendant Seaboard Machinery Corp.

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

On July 13, 1953, the summons and complaint, in the within action for a declaratory judgment and other relief were served on the purported secretary of the defendant, Seaboard Machinery Corp. (New Jersey).

On July 28, 1953, said defendant served a notice of motion to dismiss the action on the grounds (1) it is a foreign corporation not subject to process in this district, and (2) it has not been properly served with process. That motion has not yet been determined.

On August 4, 1953, plaintiff’s notice to examine the defendant, Seaboard Machinery Corp. (New Jersey), upon oral examination was served upon the attorney who had appeared “specially” for that defendant.

Defendant, Seaboard Machinery Corp. (New Jersey), now moves for an order vacating plaintiff’s notice on the grounds (1) this court has not obtained jurisdiction over the defendant, Seaboard Machinery Corp. (New Jersey), and (2) the said notice has not been served upon said defendant by leave of court.

In the affidavit in opposition to the defendant’s motion the plaintiff’s counsel states that the plaintiff’s notice to take the deposition of the defendant, Seaboard Machinery Corp. (New Jersey)

> “was served with a view to getting the sworn facts from defendant so that they might be used in opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and quash the return of service”.

*41For that purpose the better practice seems to be that the deposition be permitted.1

Leave of court to take the deposition was not required because the notice was not served within twenty days after commencement of the action.2

Settle order for the movant’s examination, limited as hereinabove indicated, to be taken at a time and place agreeable to the parties.

1

. Moore’s Fed.Prac., 2d Ed., Vol. 4, para. 26.09(2), p. 1046, footnote 33.

2

. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 26(a), 28 U.S.C.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,059,338
<SECURITIES>                                   102,717
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,620,954
<ALLOWANCES>                                    52,521
<INVENTORY>                                  5,766,927
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,430,645
<PP&E>                                       2,341,317
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,318,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,789,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,643,986
<BONDS>                                      1,193,472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,353,346
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,611,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,789,184
<SALES>                                     26,429,804
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,429,804
<CGS>                                       16,077,801
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,077,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,860,010
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             228,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,568,857
<INCOME-TAX>                                   154,461
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,414,396
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,414,396
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)




</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Recovery of Judgment, LLC, as Assignee of Joshua Wander, Respondent, v Joseph Warren, Appellant.

Submitted March 19, 2012;

decided May 1, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Lewis, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 877]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Cassandra M. Mullen, J.), rendered January 8, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal mischief in the fourth degree (two counts), possession of burglar’s tools and resisting arrest, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). Defendant’s guilt was established through compelling circumstantial evidence that lacked any reasonable innocent explanation. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Freedman and Clark, JJ.