alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME FROM ACE'S 1999 ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      984,662
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    110,332
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         340,774
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,142,475
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  76,416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,654,659
<COMMON>                                        54,963
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      493,007
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            129,981
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 677,951
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          118,950
<PREFERRED>                                      6,231
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           954,752
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              30,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   46,075
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     14,911
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                15,480
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 790,309
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,654,659
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,076,585
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            49,326
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     904,654
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     953,980
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        122,605
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               8,712
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 131,317
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        67,387
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,835<F1>
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,132
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    3,703<F1>
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        55,845
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       60,562
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                        (33,329)<F2>
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES EXTRAORDINARY LOSS OF $58,095.
<F2>INCLUDES $228,500 PAYMENT FOR TERMINATION OF PURCHASED POWER CONTRACT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Sunrise Solar Corporation; Order of Suspension 
of Trading

June 5, 2009.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Sunrise Solar Corporation (``Sunrise'') because of questions regarding 
the accuracy of statements by Sunrise Solar Corporation in press 
releases to investors concerning, among other things, the company's 
business prospects and agreements.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of Sunrise Solar Corporation.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the 
above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT 
June 5, 2009 through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on June 18, 2009.

    By the Commission.
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13551 Filed 6-5-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
§ 543.6 Does this part apply to small and charitable gaming operations? 

(a) Small gaming operations. This part does not apply to small gaming operations 

provided that: 

(1) The tribal gaming regulatory authority permits the operation to be exempt from this 

part; 

(2) The annual gross gaming revenue of the operation does not exceed $2 $3 million; and 

(3) The tribal gaming regulatory authority develops and the operation complies with 

alternate procedures that: 

(i) Protect the integrity of games offered; 

(ii) Safeguard the assets used in connection with the operation; and 

(iii) Create, prepare and maintain records in accordance with Generally Accepted 

Accounting Principles. 

(b) Charitable gaming operations. This part does not apply to charitable gaming 

operations provided that: 

(1) All proceeds are for the benefit of a charitable organization; 

(2) The tribal gaming regulatory authority permits the charitable organization to be 

exempt from this part; 

6-30-10 Version 

Page 1 of 2 
(3) The charitable gaming operation is operated wholly by the charitable organization's 

agents; 

(4) The annual gross gaming revenue of the charitable operation does not exceed $2 $3 

million; and 

(5) The tribal gaming regulatory authority develops and the charitable gaming operation 

complies with alternate procedures that: 

(i) Protect the integrity of the games offered; 

(ii) Safeguard the assets used in connection with the gaming operation; and 

(iii) Create, prepare and maintain records in accordance with Generally Accepted 

Accounting Principles. For more information please see www.fasb.gov or www.fasb.org . 

(c) Independent operators. Nothing in this section exempts gaming operations conducted 

by independent operators for the benefit of a charitable organization. 

6-30-10 Version 

Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          4,363
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     218
<ALLOWANCES>                                       73
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                          4,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  8,811
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                      8,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    8,811
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,836
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   278
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               278
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on March 18, 2009, Norac Inc., 405 S. Motor Avenue, P.O. Box 577, Azusa, California 91702-3232, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Nabilone (7379), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.

The company plans to manufacture bulk controlled substances for use in product development and for distribution to its customers.

Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such a substance, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a).

                    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control,                     **Federal Register**                     Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than August 10, 2009.                

Dated: June 3, 2009.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. E9-13351 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Bernard DeVeaux, Appellant, v Donald Sawyer, as Executive Director of Central New York Psychiatric Center, et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 28, 2011;

decided May 3, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie from the order of the individual Justice of the Appellate Division (see NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2977 

To prohibit the use of Department of Justice funds for the prosecution 

in Article III courts of the United States of individuals involved in 

the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2010 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. WEBB, Mr. MCCAIN, Mrs. 

LINCOLN, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CORKER, Mr. 

KYL, Mr. COBURN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. VITTER, Mr. HATCH, Mr. 

JOHANNS, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. PRYOR, and Mr. THUNE) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Department of Justice funds for 

the prosecution in Article III courts of the United States 

of individuals involved in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 2977 IS

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF DEPARTMENT OF 

2 JUSTICE FUNDS FOR PROSECUTION IN ARTI3 CLE III COURTS OF INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED 

4 IN THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, TERRORIST AT5 TACKS. 

6 (a) PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR PROSECU7 TION OF 9/11 TERRORISTS IN ARTICLE III COURTS.— 

8 None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made avail9 able for the Department of Justice may be obligated or 

10 expended to commence or continue the prosecution in an 

11 Article III court of the United States of an individual de12 scribed in subsection (b) for any offense that may be pros13 ecuted by military commission under chapter 47A of title 

14 10, United States Code (as amended by the Military Com15 missions Act of 2009 (title XVIII of Public Law 111–84)). 

16 (b) COVERED INDIVIDUALS.—An individual described 

17 in this subsection is an individual suspected of planning, 

18 authorizing, organizing, committing, or aiding the attacks 

19 on the United States and its citizens that occurred on Sep20 tember 11, 2001, who— 

21 (1) is not a citizen of the United States; and 

22 (2) is subject to jurisdiction under chapter 47A 

23 of title 10, United States Code (as amended by the 

24 Military Commissions Act of 2009). 

25 (c) ARTICLE III COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DE26 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘Article III court of the 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 2977 IS

1 United States’’ means a court of the United States estab2 lished under Article III of the Constitution of the United 

3 States. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13399]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

 United States Parole Commission


Record of Vote of Meeting Closure; (Pub. L. 94-409) (5 U.S.C. 
Sec. 552b)

    I, Isaac Fulwood, Chairman of the United States Parole Commission, 
was present at a meeting of said Commission, which started at 
approximately 10 a.m., on Thursday, May 21, 2009 at the U.S. Parole 
Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 
20815. The purpose of the meeting was to approve or disapprove the 
appointment of a hearing examiner. Four Commissioners were present, 
constituting a quorum, when the vote to close the meeting was 
submitted.
    Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the 
meeting and certifications of General Counsel that this meeting may be 
closed by vote of the Commissioners present were submitted to the 
Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other business. Upon motion 
duly made, seconded, and carried, the following Commissioners voted 
that the meeting be closed: Isaac Fulwood, Cranston J. Mitchell, Edward 
F. Reilly, Jr., and Patricia Cushwa.
    In witness whereof, I make this official record of the vote taken 
to close this meeting and authorize this record to be made available to 
the public.

    Dated: June 1, 2009.
Isaac Fulwood,
Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-13399 Filed 6-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Margaret Colleen Foston

, * From the 142 nd District

Court of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR37076

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00239

- CR * August 7, 2014

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the tri al court is in all things affirmed.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3028 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 190- 

day lifetime limit on inpatient psychiatric hospital services under the 

Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2010 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the 190-day lifetime limit on inpatient psychiatric hospital services under the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Mental 

5 Health Inpatient Equity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF 190-DAY LIFETIME LIMIT ON INPA7 TIENT PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL SERVICES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1812 of the Social Secu9 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395d) is amended— 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3028 IS

1 (1) in subsection (b)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (1), by adding ‘‘or’’ at 

3 the end; 

4 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘; or’’ at 

5 the end and inserting a period; and 

6 (C) by striking paragraph (3); and 

7 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘(but shall not 

8 be included’’ and all that follows before the period 

9 at the end. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply to items and services furnished 

12 on or after January 1, 2011. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>             THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
                     EXTRACTED   FROM  ASHLAND   INC.'S  ANNUAL  REPORT  TO
                     SHAREHOLDERS  FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30,
                     1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
                     SUCH ANNUAL REPORT.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                     268
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            1,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                                24
<INVENTORY>                                                729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         2,995
<PP&E>                                                   7,471
<DEPRECIATION>                                           3,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           7,777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    2,261
<BONDS>                                                  1,639
<COMMON>                                                    75
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                               1,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             7,777
<SALES>                                                 14,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        14,319
<CGS>                                                   12,424
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           12,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             8
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            320
<INCOME-TAX>                                               119
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        192
<DISCONTINUED>                                              96
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             (9)
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                               279
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             3.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             3.67
        

</TABLE>
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 02-4184



# 
J OHN R OBERT G ROOM ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge.

(CR-01-383) Submitted: October 23, 2002 Decided: November 18, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Katherine E. Evatt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Anthony S. Murry, Trial Attorney,Terrorism and Violent Crime Section, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM:John Robert Groom appeals his conviction for transmitting in interstate commerce a communication containing a threat to injure the person of another in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) (2000). Groom wasconvicted following a bench trial in the District Court of South Carolina and sentenced to eighteen months of imprisonment to be followed by a two-year term of supervised release. On appeal, Groom contendsthat there was insufficient evidence to find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.We must uphold Groom’s conviction on appeal if there is substantial evidence in the record to support it. See Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). In determining whether the evidence in the record is substantial, we view the evidence in the light most favorableto the government and inquire whether there is evidence that a reasonable finder of fact could accept as adequate and sufficient to support a conclusion of a defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Burgos , 94 F.3d 849, 862 (4th Cir. 1996) (en banc). Groomstipulated that he transmitted the letter at issue in interstate commerce. We have reviewed the record and conclude that there was sufficient evidence to find the letter contained a true threat. Accordingly, we affirm Groom’s conviction.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. G ROOM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000681

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

GREGORY LEIF DREXLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

AVANI RASHMIN-LAKHANI, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 2DV201000368)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

(By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, McCullen and Chan, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the November 18, 2022 Motion For

and Notice of Dismissal of Appeal From Order Regarding

Plaintiff's Motion Filed July 20, 2022, by Defendant-Appellant

Avani Rashmin-Lakhani, under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure

Rule 42(a), the papers in support, and the record, and noting no

opposition,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted, and

the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, December 22, 2022.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Presiding Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen

Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000681

22-DEC-2022

07:50 AM

Dkt. 14 OGMD
August 30, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LEWIN E

. BEARD , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00606

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment requiring reversal, but there was error in the ju dgment as entered, which is cap able of reformation by this Court. Ther efore, the judgment is REFORMED , t o read as follows: The judge found true paragraph numbers 1, 4, 13, 16, 26, and 35

. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.