27526 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 10, 2009 / Notices 

protests or other comments filed, but 

only those who file a motion to 

intervene in accordance with the 

Commission’s Rules may become a 

party to the proceeding. Any comments, 

protests, or motions to intervene must 

be received on or before the specified 

comment date for the particular 

application. 

o. Filing and Service of Responsive 

Documents—Any filings must bear in 

all capital letters the title 

‘‘COMMENTS’’, ‘‘PROTESTS’’, AND/OR 

‘‘MOTIONS TO INTERVENE’’, as 

applicable, and the Docket Number of 

the particular application to which the 

filing refers. A copy of any motion to 

intervene must also be served upon each 

representative of the Applicant 

specified in the particular application. 

p. Agency Comments—Federal, State, 

and local agencies are invited to file 

comments on the described application. 

A copy of the application may be 

obtained by agencies directly from the 

Applicant. If an agency does not file 

comments within the time specified for 

filing comments, it will be presumed to 

have no comments. One copy of an 

agency’s comments must also be sent to 

the Applicant’s representatives. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–13546 Filed 6–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Project No. 12636–001] 

Mohawk Hydro Corp.; Notice of 

Preliminary Permit Application 

Accepted for Filing and Soliciting 

Comments, Motions To Intervene, and 

Competing Applications 

June 3, 2009. 

On May 1, 2009, Mohawk Hydro 

Corporation filed an application, 

pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal 

Power Act, for a successive preliminary 

permit to study the feasibility of the 

Middle Mohawk Hydroelectric Project, 

to be located on the Mohawk River, in 

Schenectady and Montgomery Counties, 

New York. 

The proposed Middle Mohawk 

Hydroelectric Project would be located 

at existing facilities that are owned by 

the New York State Canal Corporation. 

The proposed run-of-river project would 

consist of the following eight 

Developments: 

Lock #8 Development 

(1) An existing 530-foot-long, 14-foothigh bridge type dam constructed 

primarily of steel, (2) an existing 

reservoir having a surface area of 336 

acres, with a storage capacity of 3,360 

acre-feet and a normal water surface 

elevation of 224 feet USGS, (3) a 

proposed intake structure, (4) two 

proposed powerhouses containing 18 

generating units having a total installed 

capacity of 6 MW, (5) a proposed 1,800- 

foot-long, 34.5 kV transmission line, and 

(6) appurtenant facilities. 

The development would have an 

annual generation of 16 gigawatt-hours 

which would be sold to a local utility. 

Lock #9 Development: 

(1) An existing 530-foot-long, 15-foothigh bridge type dam constructed 

primarily of steel, (2) an existing 

reservoir having a surface area of 428 

acres, with a storage capacity of 4,280 

acre-feet and a normal water surface 

elevation of 239 feet USGS, (3) a 

proposed intake structure, (4) two 

proposed powerhouses containing 18 

generating units having a total installed 

capacity of 6 MW, (5) a proposed 200- 

foot-long, 13.2 kV transmission line, and 

(6) appurtenant facilities. 

The development would have an 

annual generation of 17.6 gigawatthours which would be sold to a local 

utility. 

Lock #10 Development 

(1) An existing 500-foot-long, 15-foothigh bridge type dam constructed 

primarily of steel, (2) an existing 

reservoir having a surface area of 414 

acres, with a storage capacity of 4,140 

acre-feet and a normal water surface 

elevation of 254 feet USGS, (3) a 

proposed intake structure, (4) two 

proposed powerhouses containing 18 

generating units having a total installed 

capacity of 6 MW, (5) a proposed 1,500- 

foot-long, 115 kV transmission line, and 

(6) appurtenant facilities. 

The development would have an 

annual generation of 17.3 gigawatthours which would be sold to a local 

utility. 

Lock #11 Development 

(1) An existing 588-foot-long, 12-foothigh bridge type dam constructed 

primarily of steel, (2) an existing 

reservoir having a surface area of 414 

acres, with a storage capacity of 4,140 

acre-feet and a normal water surface 

elevation of 266 feet USGS, (3) a 

proposed intake structure, (4) two 

proposed powerhouses containing 18 

generating units having a total installed 

capacity of 6 MW, (5) a proposed 700- 

foot-long, 34.5 kV transmission line, and 

(6) appurtenant facilities. 

The development would have an 

annual generation of 16.1 gigawatthours which would be sold to a local 

utility. 

Lock #12 Development 

(1) An existing 460-foot-long, 11-foothigh bridge type dam constructed 

primarily of steel, (2) an existing 

reservoir having a surface area of 737 

acres, with a storage capacity of 7,370 

acre-feet and a normal water surface 

elevation of 277 feet USGS, (3) a 

proposed intake structure, (4) two 

proposed powerhouses containing 18 

generating units having a total installed 

capacity of 6 MW, (5) a proposed 400- 

foot-long, 13.2 kV transmission line, and 

(6) appurtenant facilities. 

The development would have an 

annual generation of 11.7 gigawatthours which would be sold to a local 

utility. 

Lock #13 Development 

(1) An existing 370-foot-long, 8-foothigh bridge type dam constructed 

primarily of steel, (2) an existing 

reservoir having a surface area of 464 

acres, with a storage capacity of 4,640 

acre-feet and a normal water surface 

elevation of 285 feet USGS, (3) a 

proposed intake structure, (4) a 

proposed powerhouse containing 9 

generating units having a total installed 

capacity of 3 MW, (5) a proposed 200- 

foot-long, 13.2 kV transmission line, and 

(6) appurtenant facilities. 

The development would have an 

annual generation of 7.3 gigawatt-hours 

which would be sold to a local utility. 

Lock #14 Development 

(1) An existing 430-foot-long, 8-foothigh bridge type dam constructed 

primarily of steel, (2) an existing 

reservoir having a surface area of 219 

acres, with a storage capacity of 2,190 

acre-feet and a normal water surface 

elevation of 293 feet USGS, (3) a 

proposed intake structure, (4) a 

proposed powerhouse containing 9 

generating units having a total installed 

capacity of 3 MW, (5) a proposed 200- 

foot-long, 13.2 kV transmission line, and 

(6) appurtenant facilities. 

The development would have an 

annual generation of 5.8 gigawatt-hours 

which would be sold to a local utility. 

Lock #15 Development: 

(1) An existing 430-foot-long, 8-foothigh bridge type dam constructed 

primarily of steel, (2) an existing 

reservoir having a surface area of 578 

acres, with a storage capacity of 5,780 

acre-feet and a normal water surface 


erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 10, 2009 / Notices 27527 

elevation of 293 feet USGS, (3) a 

proposed intake structure, (4) two 

proposed powerhouses containing 18 

generating units having a total installed 

capacity of 6 MW, (5) a proposed 200- 

foot-long, 13.2 kV transmission line, and 

(6) appurtenant facilities. 

The development would have an 

annual generation of 5.8 gigawatt-hours 

which would be sold to a local utility. 

The total installed capacity for all eight 

proposed developments is 41 MW and 

the total annual generation is 97.6 

gigawatt-hours. 

Applicant Contact: Mr. James A. 

Besha, P.E., President of Albany 

Engineering Corporation, Agent for 

Mohawk Hydro Corp., 5 Washington 

Square, Albany, NY 12205, (518) 456– 

7712. 

FERC Contact: John Ramer, (202) 502– 

8969. 

Deadline for filing motions to 

intervene, competing applications 

(without notice of intent), or notices of 

intent to file competing applications: 60 

days from the issuance date of this 

notice. Comments, motions to intervene, 

notices of intent, and competing 

applications may be electronically filed 

via the Internet. See 18 CFR 

385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions 

on the Commission’s Web site under the 

‘‘e-Filing’’ link. If unable to be filed 

electronically, documents may be paperfiled. To paper-file, an original and eight 

copies should be filed to: Kimberly D. 

Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission, 888 First 

Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 

more information on how to submit 

these types of filings please go to the 

Commission’s Web site located at 

http://www.ferc.gov/fillingcomments.asp. More information about 

this project can be viewed or printed on 

the ‘‘e-library’’ link of the Commission’s 

Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docsfilings/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket 

number (P–12636–001) in the docket 

number field to access the document. 

For assistance, call toll free 1–866–208– 

3372. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–13545 Filed 6–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. EL09–56–000] 

Notice of Complaint 

June 3, 2009. 

People of the State of California, ex rel., 

Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Attorney General of 

the State of California, Complainant, v. 

Powerex Corp. (f/k/a British Columbia Power 

Exchange Corp.), Sempra Energy Trading, 

LLC (f/k/a Sempra Energy Trading Corp.), 

Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC, 

TransAlta Energy Marketing (US), Inc., 

Public Service Company of New Mexico, 

MIECO, Inc., Shell Energy North America 

(U.S.), L.P. (successor by merger to Coral 

Power LLC), Merrill Lynch Capital Services, 

TransCanada Energy Ltd. (f/k/a TransCanada 

Power Corp.), Commerce Energy Corp. (f/k/ 

a Commonwealth Energy Corp.), Nevada 

Power Company, Tucson Electric Power 

Company, American Electric Power Service 

Corp., Comision Federal de Electricidad, 

Sierra Pacific Power Company, Sierra Pacific 

Industries, Avista Corp. (f/k/a Washington 

Water Power Power Company), Avista 

Energy, Inc., Sempra Energy Solutions LLC, 

Respondents. 

Notice of Complaint 

Take notice that on May 22, 2009, 

pursuant to section 206 of the Rules and 

Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 

and sections 205, 206, 306, and 309 of 

the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824(d), 

824(e), 825(e), and 825(h), the People of 

the California, ex rel. Edmond G. Brown 

Jr., Attorney General of the State of 

California (Complainant) filed a formal 

complaint against the Respondents 

alleging that the named Respondents, 

public utility sellers of short-term 

bilateral energy to the California Energy 

Resources Scheduling Division of the 

California Department of Water 

Resources (CERS) during the period 

January 18, 2001 to June 20, 2001, owe 

refunds to California ratepayers on sales 

to CERS because those sales were made 

at unjust and unreasonable prices. 

The Attorney General certifies that 

copies of the complaint were served 

upon the named Respondents or their 

authorized representatives via 

individual e-mails, by e-mails to the 

Docket EL00–95–000 and Docket EL02– 

71–000 Listserv, by e-mail to the E-mail 

service list in Docket EL01–10, and by 

express delivery service. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to 

protest this filing must file in 

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). 

Protests will be considered by the 

Commission in determining the 

appropriate action to be taken, but will 

not serve to make protestants parties to 

the proceeding. Any person wishing to 

become a party must file a notice of 

intervention or motion to intervene, as 

appropriate. The Respondent’s answer 

and all interventions, or protests must 

be filed on or before the comment date. 

The Respondent’s answer, motions to 

intervene, and protests must be served 

on the Complainants. 

The Commission encourages 

electronic submission of protests and 

interventions in lieu of paper using the 

‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. 

Persons unable to file electronically 

should submit an original and 14 copies 

of the protest or intervention to the 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20426. 

This filing is accessible on-line at 

http://www.ferc.gov, using the 

‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for 

review in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room in Washington, DC. 

There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the 

Web site that enables subscribers to 

receive e-mail notification when a 

document is added to a subscribed 

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC 

Online service, please e-mail 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call 

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call 

(202) 502–8659. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on August 20, 2009. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–13537 Filed 6–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. OR09–8–000] 

Chevron Products Company, 

Complainant, v. SFPP, L.P., 

Respondent; Notice of Complaint 

June 3, 2009. 

Take notice that on May 29, 2009, 

pursuant to Rule 206 of the Rules and 

Practice and Procedure of the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission 

(Commission), 18 CFR 385.206, section 

343.2 of the Procedural Rules 

Applicable to Oil Pipeline Proceedings, 

18 CFR 385.343.2, sections 1(5), 8, 9, 13, 

15, and 16 of the Interstate Commerce 

Act, 49 U.S.C. App. 1(5), 8, 9, 13, 15, 

and 16 (1988), and section 1803 of the 

Energy Policy Act of 1992, Chevron 

Products Company (Complainant) filed 

a formal complaint challenging the 

justness and reasonableness of the index 


erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES