alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(n)

CERTIFICATIONS

 
I, Wanda C. Curry, certify that:  
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of System Energy Resources, Inc.;  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:   
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   
b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;   
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

		/s/ Wanda C. Curry
#### Theresa Devito, Appellant, v Dennis Feliciano et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 29, 2013;

decided May 2, 2013

Motion by Defense Association of New York, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
Exhibit 32(k)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.









|/s/ Robert A. MaloneRobert A. Malone
Treasurer of Entergy Louisiana Holdings, Inc.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:	March 9, 2006
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                    CATALINA LIGHTING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                   EXHIBIT 11
          SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

                                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED 
                                                                  DECEMBER 31,
                                                         ----------------------------
                                                              1997           1996 
                                                         -----------      -----------

<S>                                                      <C>              <C>        
Net income (loss) for diluted earnings per share         $  (381,000)     $    22,000
                                                         ===========      ===========

Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding during the period                            7,105,000        7,064,000

Add:  common equivalent shares determined
      using the Treasury Stock method
      representing shares issuable upon exercise
      of stock options and warrants and shares
      issuable under contractual agreements                     --            496,000

                                                         -----------      -----------
Weighted average number of shares
  used in calculation of diluted earnings per share        7,105,000        7,560,000
                                                         ===========      ===========

Diluted earnings (loss) per share                        $     (0.05)     $      --
                                                         ===========      ===========
</TABLE>

NOTE

Subordinated notes convertible into 1,040,000 common shares were not included 
for 1997 and 1996 because their effect is anti-dilutive.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3105 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3105

 To expand the scope of the definition of airport planning to include 
                       waste management planning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 2010

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand the scope of the definition of airport planning to include 
                       waste management planning.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOLID WASTE RECYCLING PLANS.

    (a) Airport Planning.--Section 47102(5) of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended to read as follows:
            ``(5) `airport planning'--
                    ``(A) has the meaning given the term `planning' in 
                regulations prescribed by the Secretary; and
                    ``(B) includes--
                            ``(i) integrated airport system planning; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) a plan for recycling and minimizing 
                        the generation of airport solid waste, in 
                        accordance with applicable State and local 
                        recycling laws, including the cost of a waste 
                        audit.''.
    (b) Master Plan.--Section 47106(a) of title 49, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (5), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) if the project is for an airport that has an airport 
        master plan, the master plan addresses--
                    ``(A) the feasibility of solid waste recycling at 
                the airport;
                    ``(B) minimizing the generation of solid waste at 
                the airport;
                    ``(C) operation and maintenance requirements;
                    ``(D) the review of waste management contracts;
                    ``(E) the potential for cost savings or the 
                generation of revenue; and
                    ``(F) training and education requirements.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No's.
33-36761, 333-03193, 333-70397, 333-70427, 333-50390, 333-50392, and 333-153382
on Form S-8 of our reports dated September 14, 2009, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Anaren, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
"Company"), and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over
financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
for the year ended June 30, 2009.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Rochester, New York
September 14, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13362]



[[Page 27301]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 3603-013]


Pitkin County, CO, City of Aspen, CO; Notice of Application for 
Transfer of License, and Soliciting Comments, Motions to Intervene, and 
Protests

June 2, 2009.
    On May 12, 2009, Pitkin County, Colorado and City of Aspen, 
Colorado (Transferors) and City of Aspen, Colorado (Transferee) filed a 
joint application for transfer of license of the Ruedi Power Plant 
Project, located on the Fryingpan River in Pitkin and Eagle Counties, 
Colorado.
    Applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the license for 
Ruedi Power Plant Project from Pitkin County, Colorado and City of 
Aspen, Colorado to City of Aspen, Colorado.
    Applicant Contact: for Pitkin County: Mr. John M. Ely, Pitkin 
County Attorney, 530 E Main Street, Third Floor, Aspen, CO 81611. For 
the City of Aspen: Mr. Karl F. Kumli, III, Special Counsel for the City 
of Aspen, Dietze and Davis PC, 2060 Broadway, Suite 400, Boulder, CO 
80302, phone (303) 447-1375.
    FERC Contact: Robert Bell, (202) 502-6062.
    Deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to intervene: 
30 days from the issuance of this notice. Comments and motions to 
intervene may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
3603-013) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13362 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

96-330.

#### Cherovsky v. St. Luke’s Hosp. of Cleveland.

Cuyahoga App. No. 68326. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. Upon consideration of the joint application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Westlund,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to
      the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Steven Westlund


Steven
      Westlund


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      19, 2007
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                                           EXHIBIT 12
                                     APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
                  Computation of Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                                Year Ended December 31,              
                                                                   1993      1994        1995       1996       1997 
     <S>                                                         <C>       <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>     
     Fixed Charges:                                                                                                  
       Interest on First Mortgage Bonds. . . . . . . . . . .     $ 80,472  $ 75,815    $ 80,777   $ 82,082   $ 81,009
       Interest on Other Long-term Debt. . . . . . . . . . .       16,846    16,415      16,404     18,025     28,163
       Interest on Short-term Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . .        1,615     3,366       5,119      3,639      4,569
       Miscellaneous Interest Charges. . . . . . . . . . . .        2,954     3,913       5,323      7,327      6,857
       Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals . . . . .        7,900     7,700       7,000      6,600      6,000
                                                                                                                     
            Total Fixed Charges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     $109,787  $107,209    $114,623   $117,673   $126,598

     Earnings:                                                                                              
       Net Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     $125,132  $102,345    $115,900   $133,689   $120,514
       Plus Federal Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       51,681    39,599      53,355     65,801     54,835
       Plus State Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        8,887     5,910       7,273     10,180      8,109
       Plus Fixed Charges (as above) . . . . . . . . . . . .      109,787   107,209     114,623    117,673    126,598

            Total Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     $295,487  $255,063    $291,151   $327,343   $310,056

     Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. . . . . . . . . . .         2.69      2.37        2.54       2.78       2.44
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Infinity, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Stanton E. Ross
-----------------------
Stanton E. Ross
Chief Executive Officer
May 17, 2004


/s/ Jon D. Klugh
-----------------------
Jon D. Klugh
Chief Financial Officer
May 17, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Infinity, Inc. and will be retained by Infinity, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
#### FLEMING et al. v. WABASH R. CO.

No. 781-D.

United States District Court E. D. Illinois.

Oct. 7, 1948.

*420Frank L. Wolf, of Sullivan, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Frank J. Gollings, of Decatur, Ill., and Jones, Sebat, Stipp & Swanson, of Danville, Ill., for defendant.

LINDLEY, Chief Judge.

Defendant moves to strike the complaint as to Thomas Fleming because it does not set forth a cause of action in favor of Thomas Fleming against defendant, and does not specify sufficiently damages suffered by plaintiff Thomas Fleming. The motion is in essence a motion to dismiss the complaint as to Thomas Fleming and will be treated as such.

Though the complaint is perhaps not a model of good pleading, I deem it sufficiently specific to withstand the motion. Plaintiff Thomas Fleming is the father of plaintiff William Fleming, the injured party. Chapter 68, Section 15, Ill.Rev. Stats., makes the father liable for “family expenses.” This statute, of which I take judicial notice, has been construed to include “medical expenses.” The complaint contains the following averments. “By means of and as the proximate result of defendant’s negligence the plaintiffs were injured and damaged as hereinafter alleged.” “And because of said injuries, plaintiffs expended and became liable for large sums of money for ambulance service, doctors, surgery, nursing care and attention in and about endeavoring to cure the said William Fleming.”

Inasmuch as there need be no averment that the child was not emancipated for “Emancipation is never presumed, it must be proved * * Zozaski v. Mather Stock Car Co., 312 Ill.App. 585, 588, 38 N.E.2d 825, 826, we know that, under the Illinois law, plaintiff Thomas Fleming was liable for the medical expenses of his minor son, and are informed by the complaint that he “expended and became liable for large sums of money for doctors, surgery, nurses, etc.” This seems to be enough to state a cause of action under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure detailed pleading is seldom required. According to the illustrative form of a Complaint for Negligence, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, Appendix of Forms, Form 9, it is only necessary to allege that defendant acted negligently and that as a result the plaintiff was injured.” Watson v. World of Mirth Shows, D.C.Ga., 4 F.R.D. 31, 32. Here, the complaint alleges negligence on the part of defendant and asserts that plaintiff Thomas Fleming was injured and damaged thereby in that he incurred, became liable for and paid large sums of money for medical expenses for his son. I think the complaint states a cause of action in behalf of Thomas Fleming.

The motion is denied.
Exhibit 4.1


 





THE
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 


NEW
YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


240
Greenwich Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286


 


August
11, 2022


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc. 


2001
Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany,
New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust
596 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear
Sirs:


 


The
Bank of New York Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”)
included in the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust
on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on August 10,
2022, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement.
We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in
the Registration Statement (No. 333-265896) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration
of the sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


	 	Very truly
    yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/  Margarita
    Kalantarova
	 	Margarita Kalantarova
	 	Vice President
#### Cornelius BECHAK v. CONEMAUGH AND BLACK LICK RAILROAD COMPANY.

Civ. A. No. 14879.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. 6, 1955.

*148Richter, Lord & Farage, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Barnes, Deehert, Price, Myers & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KRAFT, District Judge.

The sole question involved concerns the following interrogatory to the second sentence of which the defendant objects :

> “15. State the names, addresses and job classifications of plaintiff’s fellow crew and gang workers, if any, who were working with the plaintiff at the time of the accident. State where each stood in relation to the plaintiff, what each was doing at the time of the accident and what part, if any, each played in the event.”

To require the defendant to answer that part of the interrogatory objected to would, under the present circumstances, clearly oblige the defendant, under oath, to state, as true facts unsworn oral or written statements of others; or, in the event of differing statements, to elect which defendant believes. We conclude that not even the most liberal construction of Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 33, 28 U.S.C., demands that a party to an action must, under these circumstances, elect to adopt or reject, under oath, the observations and recollections of the actual witnesses to the event.

This Court follows the latest rulings in this district in which identical objections to identical interrogatories were sustained. Shechtman v. Pennsylvania R. Co., D.C., 16 F.R.D. 459 and cases therein cited.

The defendant's objection to the second sentence of the interrogatory is sustained.
#### URBAN BRANDS INCORPORATED, petitioner, v. Evelyn Rodriguez OQUENDO.

No. 06-557.

Jan. 8, 2007.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico denied.
[969 NE2d 779, 946 NYS2d 561]

#### In the Matter of Diane L. Schilling.

Decided May 31, 2012

*850APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*E. Stewart Jones, Jr.,*Troy, for petitioner.

*Robert H. Tembeckjian,*New York City, for New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On the Court’s own motion, it is determined that Honorable Diane L. Schilling is suspended, with pay, effective immediately, from the office of Justice of the East Greenbush Town Court, Rensselaer County, pending disposition of her request for review of a determination by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct.

Concur: Judges Cipaeick, Graffeo, Smith, Pigott and Jones. Taking no part: Chief Judge Lippman and Judge Read.