alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.15
 Execution Version
 AMENDMENT No. 3
TO
NOTE PURCHASE AND PRIVATE SHELF AGREEMENT
     Definitions.
 Uncommitted Facility. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING,
THIS AMENDMENT AND THE AGREEMENT HAVE BEEN ENTERED INTO ON THE EXPRESS UNDERSTANDING THAT NEITHER
PRUDENTIAL NOR ANY PRUDENTIAL AFFILIATE SHALL BE OBLIGED TO MAKE OR ACCEPT OFFERS TO PURCHASE SHELF
NOTES, OR TO QUOTE RATES, SPREADS OR OTHER TERMS WITH RESPECT TO SPECIFIC PURCHASES OF SHELF NOTES,
AND




---



##### 



THE
FACILITY SHALL IN NO WAY BE CONSTRUED AS A COMMITMENT BY PRUDENTIAL OR ANY PRUDENTIAL AFFILIATE.
 Amendment to Paragraph 2B(2).
 Amendment to Paragraph 5A(i).
 Amendment to Paragraph 5A(ii).
 Amendment to Paragraph 5D.
 5D. Covenant to Secure Notes Equally.
 Amendment to Paragraph 5K.
 5K. Lines of Business.
 Amendment to Paragraph 6B.




---



##### 



6B(1). Minimum Consolidated Net Worth.
 Amendment to Paragraph 6D.
  Amendment to Paragraph 6I.
 6I. Subsidiary Preferred Stock.
 Amendment to Paragraph 10B.
 Consolidated Net Worth
 Company Representations




---



##### 



Effective Date
 General Provisions.
 Reference to and Effect on Note Agreement
 Governing Law
 Counterparts
 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank]




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 COMPANY:
CHS Inc.By:Name:
    John SchmitzTitle:
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer PRUDENTIAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.By:Vice PresidentTHE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY
OF AMERICABy:Vice PresidentING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANYBy:
    Prudential Private Placement Investors, L.P.(as Investment Advisor)By:
    Prudential Private Placement Investors, Inc.(as its General Partner)By:Vice President




---



##### 



RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYBy:
    Prudential Private Placement Investors,L.P. (as Investment Advisor)By:
    Prudential Private Placement Investors, Inc.(as its General Partner)By:Vice PresidentMUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANYBy:
    Prudential Private Placement Investors,L.P. (as Investment Advisor)By:
    Prudential Private Placement Investors, Inc.(as its General Partner) By:Vice President UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYBy:
    Prudential Private Placement Investors,L.P. (as Investment Advisor)By:
    Prudential Private Placement Investors, Inc.(as its General Partner) By:Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

*Time and Date:*                         1 p.m.-3 p.m., July 22, 2009 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Member Conflict Review, PA 07-318.”                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Chris Langub, Scientific Review Administrator, Office Of Extramural Programs, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E74, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; Telephone: (404) 498-2543.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: June 3, 2009.

Lorenzo Falgiano,

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-13559 Filed 6-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### Blodgett et al., Appellants, *v.*Kahn et al.: Lima Memorial Hospital, Appellee.

[Cite as *Blodgett v. Kahn*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 1226.]

(No. 96-757

Submitted April 15, 1997

Decided June 4, 1997.)

*Williams, Jilek, Lafferty & Gallagher Co., L.P.A, Martin W. Williams*and *Peter O. DeClark,*for appellants.

*Robison, Curphey & O’Connell*and *E. Thomas Maguire,*for appellee.

*Leeseberg, Maloon, Schulman & Valentine*and *Jeffrey L. Maloon,*urging reversal for *amicus curiae,*Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

*Elsass, Wallace, Evans, Schnelle & Co., L.P.A,*and *Stanley R. Evans,*urging affirmance for *amicus curiae,*Ohio Hospital Association.

The appeal is dismissed, *sua sponte,*as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., dissents.
#### In the Matter of Jennifer Sniffen, Respondent, v Arthur Weygant, Appellant. (And Two Other Related Proceedings.)

Submitted March 28, 2011;

decided May 5, 2011

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
NATION GAMING COMMISSION fir\ i 

- P.O. --. Box 514 fl'l t'awnee, OB 74058 - 

Ph. 918-762-3338 4 

Tracie Stevens, Chairperson 

Daniel Little, Associate Commissioner 

National Indian Gaming Commission 

1441 L St., N.W., Suite 9100 

Washington, DC 20005 

RE: Comments on "Electronic One Touch Bingo System" 

Dear Chairperson Stevens and Commissioner Little: 

The Pawnee Nation Gaming Commission is writing this letter to let you know we agree 

with the Commission's proposal to "reinterpret the position regarding one touch bingo". 

As was echoed by all in attendance at the consultation recently held at the Oklahoma 

Indian Gaming Conference in Oltlahoma City, one touch bingo is a Class I1 game and 

that the one touch auto-daub is consistent with the IC;RA definition of Bingo. We believe 

that advances in technology should not hinder the determination that the game is a live 

bingo game that is Lalcing place across a linked network of actual players. 

The Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma is pleased that the Commission has decided to clarify 

that a game that is otherwise Class I1 bingo is not converted into a Class 111 game through 

the addition of the one touch auto daub feature. 

Sincerely, 

Vi Wills, Gaming Director 

Pawnee Nation Gaming Commission
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6649

LEXIE WILLIAMS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DR. ROBLES; DR. GRADDY; DR. DUBOIS; DR. NOGO , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:21

- ct

- 03246

- FL )

Submitted : January 6, 2023 Decided: January 18, 2023

Before WYNN and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Lexie Williams , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6649 Doc: 7 Filed: 01/18/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:

Lexie Williams seeks to appeal the distri ct court’s order dismissing h is complaint

under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party in a civil case , the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the dist rict court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its order on February 28, 2022

. Williams filed t he notice of appeal on May 25, 2022

. * Because Williams failed to file a timely notice of appeal or obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dism iss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on Williams’ Declaration of Inmate Filing and postmark appearing on the envelope containing the notice of appeal and Declaration is the earliest date Williams could have delivered the notice to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c) (1) ; Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 , 276 (1988). USCA4 Appeal: 22-6649 Doc: 7 Filed: 01/18/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 11
      American Home Products Corporation and
                   Subsidiaries
         Computation of Per Share Earnings
      (In thousands except per share amounts)
                                                    Year Ended
                                                   December 31,
                                                       1996


1.Net Income .................................        $1,883,403
2.Reported earnings per share:
    a.  Average number of shares outstanding
  during the year ............................           634,834
    b.  Shares issuable upon the conversion of
  preferred stock ............................               592
    c.  Shares for reported earnings per share
  calculation (2a+2b) ........................           635,426
    d.  Reported earnings per share (1/2c) ...             $2.96

3.Primary earnings per share:
    a.  Average number of share outstanding
  during the year ............................           634,834
    b.  Shares issuable upon the conversion of
  preferred stock ............................               592
    c.  Shares deemed outstanding from the
  assumed execise of stock options reduced 
  by the number of shares purchased with the 
  proceeds (determined using average market 
  price during the year)......................            11,198
    d.  Deferred contingent common stock awards              457
    e.  Shares for primary earnings per share
  calculation (+3b+3c+3d)....................            647,081
    f.  Primary earnings per share (1/3e).....             $2.91

4.Fully diluted earnings per share:
    a.  Average number of shares outstanding
  during the year ...........................            634,834
    b.  Shares issuable upon the conversion of
  preferred stock ...........................                592
    c.  Shares deemed outstanding from the
     assumed execise of stock options reduced by
     the number of shares purchased with the
     proceeds (determined using market price at
     year-end)...............................             11,924
    d.  Deferred contingent common stock awards              457
    e.  Shares for fully diluted earnings per
     share calculation (4a+4b+4c+4d)........             647,807
    f.  Fully diluted earnings per share (1/4e)            $2.91
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         11,986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,502
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,849
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   945
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (124)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (233)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (233)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (233)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
97-125.

#### State ex rel. Troutman v. Voinovich.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondents. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1366

In re: PHIL JEMAR GRAHAM, a/k/a Touche,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(4:05-cr-01210-TLW-1)

Submitted: June 19, 2014 Decided: June 23, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phil Jemar Graham, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Phil Jemar Graham petitions for a writ of mandamus 

challenging his career offender sentence and seeking relief from 

this Court. We conclude that Graham is not entitled to mandamus 

relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used 

only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States 

Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. 

Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, 

mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a 

clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan 

Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).

Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal,

In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007),

and the relief sought by Graham is not available by way of 

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Dean L. Cash, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-K of ATEL Cash  Distribution
Fund V, LP;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within
     those entities,  particularly during the period in which this annual report
     is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
     procedures  as of December 31, 2003 (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
     process,  summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
     employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
     controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls  subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:               6/1/2004

 /s/ Dean Cash
--------------------
Dean L. Cash
President and Chief Executive
Officer of General Partner
BLM Aviation Safety & 

Training FY 2016 

 

Summary

Accident 

 Zero accidents in FY16. The BLM ten year (2007-2016) average accident rate per 100,000 

flight hours dropped from 3.97 in 2015 to 3.66 for 2016. 

Incident with Potential (IWP) 

 Zero IWPs 

Elevated Safecom 

 Zero Elevated Safecoms 

Safety Management 

Systems (SMS)

The BLM continues its dedication to SMS. 2016 was the 

fourth field season for Exclusive-Use (Ex-Use) Helicopter 

reviews and the second year 

for Fixed Wing (Air Tactical, 

Smokejumper, SEAT and 

Utility) Ex-Use aircraft reviews. 

Reviewed L48 & AK: 

19% of SEATs 

25% of Helicopters 

30% of Air Tactical 

20% of Smokejumper 

FY16 goal to review 25-30% 

of all Ex-Use contracts in 

L48 & AK. 

SAFECOM Summary 

FY16 (Submissions) 

 Helicopter (45) 

 SEAT (12) 

 Airtankers (5) 

 Airplane (44) 

 UAS (14) 

Average for all types of aircraft: 1 submission per 186 

flight hours. 1/186 flt hrs. 

Non-Fire Training (IAT) 

 4261 IAT course completions. 

 Course most often completed: A-100 Basic Aviation Safety, A-110 

Transport of Hazardous 

Materials, A-200 Annual 

Mishap Review, A-219 

Helicopter Transport of 

External Cargo 

Aviation Leadership Development Initiative (ALDI)

Aviation Leadership Development Initiative (ALDI) #3 finished fall 2016. Two candidates completed/

participated: College Courses in Aviation Safety Management Systems (4 each), job shadowing at the 

state and national levels, FW & RW aircraft inspections, NWCG course coordination, Pinch Hitter 

course completion & coordination, aviation OJT on fire assignments, National Aerial Firefighter Academy (NAFA 1 & 2), FAC-COR Training. ALDI #4 advertised spring 2017.

Questions or comments, contact Kirk Rothwell Aviation Safety & Training Advisor 208-387-5879 or mrothwell@blm.gov 

BLM Accident & Accident Rate 

2007-2016

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Accidents

Accident Rate

Trendline

ZERO

ZERO

3.5

5.4

5.7

6.6

BLM 10 Yr. Avg.

3.66 accidents/100k flt. 

hrs.

6.6

7.8

ZEROZERO

# Accidents/100,000 Flt. Hrs.