alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3129 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to allow States to certify children 

for participation in the special supplemental nutrition program for 

women, infants, and children for a period of 1 year. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2010 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to allow States 

to certify children for participation in the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children for a period of 1 year. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION PRO4 GRAM FOR WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHIL5 DREN. 

6 Section 17(d)(3)(A) of the Child Nutrition Act of 

7 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1786(d)(3)(A)) is amended— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3129 IS

1 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘clause (ii)’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘clauses (ii) and (iii)’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(iii) CHILDREN.—A State may elect 

5 to certify children for a period of 1 year.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Exhibit 12(c)

                          Entergy Louisiana, Inc.
           Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and
    Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends



                                                               1998      1999       2000      2001      2002
<S>                                                           <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed charges, as defined:
Total Interest                                                $122,890  $117,247  $111,743  $116,076  $100,667
  Interest applicable to rentals                                 9,564     9,221     6,458     7,951     6,496
                                                              ------------------------------------------------

Total fixed charges, as defined                                132,454   126,468   118,201   124,027  $107,163

Preferred dividends, as defined (a)                             20,925    16,006    16,102    12,374   $10,647
                                                              ------------------------------------------------

Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined    $153,379  $142,474  $134,303  $136,401  $117,810
                                                              ================================================
Earnings as defined:

  Net Income                                                  $179,487  $191,770  $162,679  $132,550  $144,709
  Add:
    Provision for income taxes:
Total Taxes                                                    109,104   122,368   112,645    86,287    84,765
    Fixed charges as above                                     132,454   126,468   118,201   124,027   107,163
                                                              ------------------------------------------------

Total earnings, as defined                                    $421,045  $440,606  $393,525  $342,864  $336,637
                                                              ================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined                    3.18      3.48      3.33      2.76      3.14
                                                              ================================================

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
 preferred dividends, as defined                                  2.75      3.09      2.93      2.51      2.86
                                                              ================================================


------------------------
(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by
    dividing the preferred dividend requirement by one hundred percent (100%)
    minus the income tax rate.


</TABLE>
#### In Re: DB ISLAMORADA, LLC, Debtor-in-Possession. David Finnegan, William P. Kelly, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DB Islamorada, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 10-10780.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 19, 2011.

William Patrick Kelly, Jr., Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

*280Patricia A. Redmond, for Defendant-Ap-pellee.

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal involves a challenge to sanctions imposed by the Bankruptcy Court on David Finnegan (client) and William P. Kelly, Jr. (lawyer). We have studied the record and the briefs and have had the benefit of oral argument. The record simply fails to support the sanctions imposed on David Finnegan. On the other hand, there is ample evidence supporting the sanctions imposed upon William P. Kelly, Jr.

The sanctions imposed upon David Finnegan are vacated; the sanctions imposed upon William P. Kelly, Jr. are affirmed.

VACATED in part; AFFIRMED in part.
No. 972.

#### O’Brien *v.*Pabst Sales Co.

March 30, 1942.

*Mr. R. G. Storey*for petitioner. *Mr. Alex F. Weisberg*and *Wm. T. Woodson*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.





|/s/ J. Wayne LeonardJ. Wayne Leonard
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of Entergy Corporation
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:	February 28, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2827 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2827

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the military 
  housing allowance exclusion for purposes of determining area gross 
   income in determining whether a residential rental property is a 
   qualified residential rental property for purposes of the exempt 
                          facility bond rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 3, 2009

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the military 
  housing allowance exclusion for purposes of determining area gross 
   income in determining whether a residential rental property is a 
   qualified residential rental property for purposes of the exempt 
                          facility bond rules.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Families Affordable Homes 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF MILITARY HOUSING ALLOWANCE EXCLUSION FOR 
              DETERMINING AREA MEDIAN GROSS INCOME FOR QUALIFIED 
              RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROJECT EXEMPT FACILITY BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (B) of section 142(d)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``qualified military installation to 
        which'' and all that follows through ``December 31, 2005'' in 
        clause (iii)(I) and inserting ``military installation or 
        facility'', and
            (2) by striking clause (iv).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to determinations of the status of qualified residential rental 
projects for periods beginning after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, with respect to bonds issued before, on, or after such date.
                                 <all>
```
#### In re: Tommy F. ROBINSON; Carolyn Robinson, Debtors, Tommy F. Robinson; Carolyn Robinson, Appellants, v. Wildlife Farms II, LLC, also known as Mallard Pointe Lodge and Reserve LLC; Bill Thompson; Boyd Rothwell, Appellees.

No. 10-2785.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.

Filed: Jan. 19, 2011.

David O. Bowden, Little Rock, AR, for Appellants.

Stuart W. Hankins, Hankins Law Firm, North Little Rock, AR, for Appellees.

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Tommy and Carolyn Robinson appeal the district court’s1 affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s2 order restraining them from pursuing certain claims and defenses in state court, on the ground that those claims and defenses are property of their bankruptcy estates. After carefully reviewing the record, *see In re Reynolds,*425 F.3d 526, 531 (8th Cir.2005) (like district court, appellate court reviews bankruptcy court’s fact findings for clear error and conclusions of law de novo), we conclude that the bankruptcy court’s order is enforceable for the reasons discussed by the district court, *see*11 U.S.C. § 105(a) (bankruptcy court may issue any order necessary or appropriate to carry out provisions of title). Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

2

. The Honorable James G. Mixon, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3147 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22 (legislative day, MARCH 19), 2010 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patient Choice Res5 toration Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and 

8 the amendments made by that Act, are repealed. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
*Friday, May 9, 1997*

DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

94-2184.

#### In re Resignation of Kuhlman.

IT IS ORDERED by this court, *sua sponte,*effective May 7,1997, that Jack D. Kuhlman, Attorney Registration No. 0001109, last known address in Columbiana, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of November 17, 1994, to wit: failure to pay publication costs in the amount of $40.95 on or before April 18, 1996.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 27, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41028

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAVIER RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-01-CR-539-1

--------------------

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Javier Ramirez was convicted for conspiracy and possession

with intent to distribute in excess of 100 kilograms of marijuana.

The district court made a two-level upward departure and sentenced

Ramirez to 121 months of imprisonment. Ramirez has moved to

supplement the record with additional evidence indicating he was a

minor player in the drug conspiracy. But "[a]n appellate court may

not consider new evidence furnished for the first time on appeal.

. . . " Theriot v. Parish of Jefferson, 185 F.3d 477, 491 n.26
No. 02-41028

-2-

(5th Cir. 1999). Therefore, Ramirez’s motion to supplement the

record is DENIED. 

On appeal, Ramirez first argues that the district court erred

in denying his request to remove a member of the venire for cause.

Because the prospective juror was not seated on the jury, Ramirez

has not shown that any reversible error arose from the district

court’s decision not to strike this juror for cause. See United

States v. Martinez-Salazar, 528 U.S. 304, 306-07 (2000).

Ramirez also argues that the district court’s addition of two

levels to his sentencing score under § 3B1.1(c) was in error, as he

disputes the district court’s factual finding that he supervised

Charles Elizondo. Ramirez has not shown this finding was in clear

error, however, and therefore we will not vacate his sentence.

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



I, Robert Varakian, Chief Executive Officer of Catalina Lighting, Inc., hereby certify to my knowledge, and I, Gary Rodney, Chief Financial Officer,
Catalina Lighting, Inc., hereby certify to my knowledge, that:



| | (a) | The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                         |  |                        
| |  | ----------------------- |  | -----------------------
| |  | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
| |  |                        
| |  | /S/ Robert Varakian     |  | /s/ Gary Rodney        
| |  | Robert Varakian         |  | Gary Rodney            
| |  |                        
| |  | Date: February 14, 2005 |  | Date: February 14, 2005



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Catalina Lighting, Inc. and will be retained by Catalina Lighting, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004








In connection with the Quarterly Report of All Grade Mining, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary Kouletas, President of the Company, respectfully certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that:





That as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, I conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012. In making this evaluation, I used the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, I concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of September 30, 2012.





The Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Gary Kouletas


Gary Kouletas


President (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)








Date: 14 June 2013





This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to All Grade Mining, Inc. and will be retained by All Grade Mining, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Page 31 of 31
Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO SECTION 302 

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 

I, Todd E. Siegel, certify that: 

    1.                 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Medical Technology          Systems, Inc.; 

    2.                 Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a          material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements          made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

    3.                 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial          condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and          for, the periods presented in this report; 

    4.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for          establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in          Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

        Inconnection with the quarterly report of Medical Technology Systems, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form10-Q”), I, Michael P. Conroy, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)              The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

(2)              The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ranell M. Jacobson, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Union Security Insurance Company; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 9, 2006
Exhibit 21

      The  seven registrants, Entergy Corporation, System Energy Resources,
Inc., Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Entergy Louisiana,
Inc.,  Entergy Mississippi, Inc., and Entergy New Orleans, Inc., are listed
below:

                                                 State or Other
                                                Jurisdiction of
                                                  Incorporation

       Entergy Corporation                            Delaware
       System Energy Resources, Inc. (a)              Arkansas
       Entergy Arkansas, Inc. (a)                     Arkansas
       Entergy Gulf States, Inc. (a)                  Texas
       Entergy Louisiana, Inc. (a)                    Louisiana
       Entergy Mississippi, Inc. (a)                  Mississippi
       Entergy New Orleans, Inc. (a)                  Louisiana
_______________________

(a)Entergy  Corporation  owns  all of the Common  Stock  of  System  Energy
   Resources,  Inc.,  Entergy  Arkansas Inc., Entergy  Gulf  States,  Inc.,
   Entergy   Louisiana,  Inc.,  Entergy  Mississippi,  Inc.,  Entergy   New
   Orleans, Inc.
97-95.

#### Schilling v. Fifth Dist. Court of Appeals.

In Prohibition. On answer of respondent and on motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.