alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***Official Fire Information***

Those of us in the information business realize there is value to being an “official” source. Toward that end, we have attempted to create a way to “brand” official information sites in a non-agency logo, interagency way.  Here, you will see a new logo.  We encourage you to use this logo as the avatar on your social media sites, on business cards you hand out, on your bulletin boards as a poster, on community bulletin boards or trapline stops, and even on your letterhead for your press releases, instead of your team or the agency letterhead. The public will quickly learn that, where the “official” logo is, is an official site for information.

The idea is that if we work together, on incidents across the country, we can educate communities about how to know when information is “official.”  If we all use the logo (the actual name on the account will be specific to each incident so there will be no confusion when there are multiple incidents), we can achieve something like InciWeb has: an interagency, available to all, crossing all agency boundaries, point of “official” information.

This logo is merely a suggestion.  It was not created nor approved by a large group but by only a few PIO’s interested in finding a way to brand “official information” when agency logos cannot be used; and get something out in time for the 2012 fire season!  Use it if you think it will help your communities understand WHICH information is from the official source.  

# image1.jpeg
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Mary Paul, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 460 C.D. 2019

:

Pennsylvania Public Utility :

Commission, :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, September 18 , 2023

, upon consideration of P etitioner’s

application for re consideration

, and Intervenor PECO Energy Company’s

answer in response thereto, the application is DENIED

.
#### Mack Neil MYERS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Henry Dargan McMaster, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina; Lieber Correctional Institution, Warden, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 06-7138.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 7, 2006.

*322Mack Neil Myers, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 86(c).

PER CURIAM:

Mack Neil Myers seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying rehef on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Myers that the failure to file timely, specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Myers failed to specifically object to the dispositive portion of the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. *Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Myers has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHS Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodended May 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, John Schmitz, Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.     /s/John Schmitz           John Schmitz *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*July 8, 2005
<PAGE>
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortis Benefits Insurance
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ ROBERT B. POLLOCK
----------------------------
Robert B. Pollock
Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2003
***NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION***

***MICS AUDIT CHECKLIST***

***KENO (KE)***

Page 16 of 16
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,498
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                       848
<INVENTORY>                                     25,929
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,839
<PP&E>                                          41,375
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,648
<BONDS>                                        125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,944
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,935)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,231
<SALES>                                        220,404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,966
<CGS>                                          169,260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,808)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,919)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,189)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,260)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,897)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (8.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.90)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-60560 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CLIFF STOKES, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:95-CR-72-3-B

- - - - - - - - - - October 18, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Cliff Stokes appeals from the district court’s denial of his motions for production of a transcript at government expense, for copies of all records regarding his case at government expense, and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Even if it is assumed that Stokes was indigent, he was not entitled to production of a transcript and copies of all court records regarding his case at government expense in order to search for possible defects. See Walker v. United States , 424 F.2d 278, 278-79 (5th Cir. 1970). Furthermore, because there was no actionNo. 99-60560 -2- or appeal pending, the district court could not have granted his motion to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the instant appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS and Stokes’s request for appointment of counsel is DENIED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11040 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DAVID CHIN KWAN , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 83

- 1

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and OWEN and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * David Chin Kwan appeals his sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana. He contends that the district court imposed an unconstitutional , standard , supervised release condition requiring him to “permit a probation officer to visit [him] at any time at home or elsewhere and permit confiscation of any contraband observed in plain view by the probation officer.” He further argues that the district court procedurally erred by

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 19, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11040 Document: 00515003018 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2019No. 18

- 11040

2 imposing the condition without explanation. Our review is for plain error only

. See United States v. Cabello , 916 F.3d 543, 544 (5th Cir. 2019) ; United States v. Mondragon

- Santiago , 564 F.3d 357, 361 (5th Cir. 2009); see also Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009) ( explaining plain error standard of
review ). We recently uphe ld a similar , if not identical, condition on plain error review, noting that we ha d not yet addressed the constitutionality or substantive reasonableness of such a condition or whether a sentencing court must give reasons for imposing a standard supervised release condition. Cabello , 916 F.3d at 544. Because our law remains unsettled and the other federal circuits have reached divergent conclusions, Kwan cannot satisfy the second prong of the plain error test

— that the error be clear or obvious under exist ing law. See United States v. McRae , 702 F.3d 806, 833 (5th Cir. 2012); compare United States v. Kappes , 782 F.3d 828, 844, 850

- 51 (7th Cir. 2015), with United States v. Clarke , 428 F. App’x 712, 713 (9th Cir. 2011) ; see also Puckett , 556 U.S. at 135. AFFIRMED. Case: 18-11040 Document: 00515003018 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/19/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,038
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         12,019
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,502
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,432
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   480
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      598
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (211)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     93
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 93
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        93
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                 INFINITY, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Infinity, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2003:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Infinity, Inc.






/s/ Jon D Klugh
Jon D. Klugh
Chief Financial Officer
August 19, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Infinity, Inc. and will be
retained by Infinity, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.
Exhibit 31(e)

CERTIFICATIONS

** 
I, E. Renae Conley, certify that:  
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.;  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:   
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   
b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;   
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

		/s/ E. Renae Conley 		

**
Document

Exhibit 10.3
Strictly Private & Confidential


June 9, 2022


Dear Mr. Textor:


You have advised us on your potential acquisition of interests owned by IDG Capital and Pathé SAS (collectively, the “Lyon Selling Shareholders”) in Olympique Lyonnais Groupe SA (“Lyon”) (“the Transaction”).  In support of the Transaction, Cannae Holdings, Inc. (“Cannae”) is providing this binding commitment letter to provide up to a €523 million Credit Facility to John Textor (“Textor”) with summary terms and key conditions to funding set forth below:   


Summary Terms


Borrower:  John Textor or his assignee


Lender:  Cannae Holdings, Inc. or a subsidiary thereof 


Size of Commitment:  Up to €523 million


Use of Proceeds:  Capital to acquire interests in Lyon owned by the Lyon Selling Shareholders as well as tender for Lyon’s free float, fund up to €80 million of equity financing and potentially acquire interests in Lyon owned by Holnest / the Aulus Family


Interest Rate:  8% per annum payable at maturity


Maturity:  1 year from closing


Collateral:  Mr. Textor’s existing 40% interest in Crystal Palace, as well as all equity interests of Lyon acquired as a result of the Transaction


Guarantee:  Personal guarantee from Mr. Textor as well as entities holding Mr. Textor’s equity interests in Crystal Palace and Lyon


Negative Covenants:  After the Transaction has closed, no ability for Lyon and Crystal Palace to pay dividends / restricted payments to equity holders (subject to Cannae approval) or if Textor does not control Lyon or Crystal Palace, then any such dividends or restricted payments will be used to pay interest and then principal under the note. 


Repayment Terms:  100% of loan due one year from closing


Fees:  Cannae agrees to waive all fees other than Transaction related fees and expenses incurred


We look forward to working to complete the debt Commitment and Transaction.  This letter supersedes and replaces that certain letter to you dated May 22, 2022.


















/s/ William P. Foley
...................................................................
William P. Foley, II
Chairman
Cannae Holdings, Inc. 




/s/ John Textor
...................................................................
John Textor
Title: 
Company:
Exhibit 32(c)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,



|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.





|/s/ Hugh T. McDonaldHugh T. McDonald
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer 
of Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	February 28, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
ANACOMP,  INC.'S  SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.  THE INCOME  STATEMENT
DATA IS THE  COMBINATION  OF RESULTS FOR THE EIGHT MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1996 AND
FOR THE FOUR MONTHS  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,  1996.  EPS DATA IS FOR ONLY THE FOUR
MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         47,795
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  65,265
<ALLOWANCES>                                   6,459
<INVENTORY>                                    31,856
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               147,530
<PP&E>                                         30,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 435,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,148
<BONDS>                                        248,892
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       101
<OTHER-SE>                                     58,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   435,421
<SALES>                                        296,883
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               486,140
<CGS>                                          226,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  331,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               592
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             39,629
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                98,619
<INCOME-TAX>                                   98,619
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            90,519
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                52,442
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   142,961
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (2.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.19)