alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         (168,980)
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,214,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,045,423
<PP&E>                                         27,932
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,575,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,378,507
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,343
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,032,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,575,774
<SALES>                                        2,563,820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,563,820
<CGS>                                          1,721,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  756,865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             75,374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                10,059
<INCOME-TAX>                                   17,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            8,059
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   8,059
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.03



</TABLE>
#### Victoria L. SCHU, Appellant v. SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST HEADQUARTERS, Appellee.

No. 06-7115.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 17, 2006.

Victoria L. Schu, Forestville, MD, pro se.

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and GRIFFITH and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*26
      *JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(3). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed May 11, 2006, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because it is not a civil action arising under federal law, *see*28 U.S.C. § 1331, or between citizens of different states with an amount in controversy of more than $75,000, *see*28 U.S.C. § 1332; nor does the complaint allege any other basis for the district court’s jurisdiction.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC. FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             499
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,351
<INVENTORY>                                      2,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,762
<PP&E>                                           8,712
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,694
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,040
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,760
<SALES>                                          5,147
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,147
<CGS>                                            2,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (370)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (370)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.06)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This ledgend contains summary financial information extracted from Entergy's
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1995, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such fianacial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000066901
<NAME> MISSISSIPPI POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER> 010
   <NAME> MISSISSIPPI POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,001,686
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     11,146
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         281,482
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       287,669
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,581,983
<COMMON>                                       199,326
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        (218)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            231,463
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 430,571
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           16,770
<PREFERRED>                                     57,881
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           494,404
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   61,015
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 521,342
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,581,983
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      889,843
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            33,716
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     739,445
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        116,672
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,825
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 119,497
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        50,830
<NET-INCOME>                                    68,667
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      7,515
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   61,152
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        61,700
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         184,943
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
May 18,2005 

Via electronic mail 

Mr. Monte Bowman 

aivrasinc@yahoo.com 

Re: Keno 

Dear Mr. Bowman: 

John Peterson forwarded your May 12,2005, letter to me for reply. 

The National Indian Gaming Commission, not the Nebraska Attorney General, 

determined that Keno is a Class I11 game. The Commission adopted a regulation to that 

effect in 1992, and the courts upheld the regulation against subsequent legal challenge. 

Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Conzrnunity u. Hope, 16 F.3d 261 (8'h Cir. 1994). The regulation 

reads, in relevant part: 

Class 111 gaming means all forms of gaming that are not Class I or Class 

I1 gaming, including, but not limited to: 

(a) Any house banking game, including but not limited to - ... 

(2) Casino games such as roulette, craps, and keno ... 

25 C.F.R. 5 502.4(a)(!2). 

I trust that this answers your questions about Keno's classification, but please feel free to 

contact me if it does not. 

Very truly yours, 

Mi ael Gross 

Sta f Attorney f 

cc: John Peterson 

1 jr 

NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1441 L St. NW, Suite 9100. Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 WWW.NIGC.GOV 

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento. CA; Phoenix. AZ. St. Paul. MN; Tulsa. OK
EXHIBIT 21.1



|                                                                |  |               
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|ENTITY NAME (all 100% owned unless indicated otherwise)         |  | STATE OF INC. 
|AssuranceAmerica Corporation (the Company)                      |  | Nevada        
|fka BrainWorks Ventures, Inc.                                   |  |               
|fka Auric Metals Corporation                                    |  |               
|TrustWay Insurance Agencies, LLC                                |  | Delaware      
|fka AssetAmerica Insurance Agencies, LLC                        |  |               
|fka AssetAmerica Insurance, LLC                                 |  |               
|fka AcceptanceAmerica Insurance, LLC                            |  |               
|AssuranceAmerica Managing General Agency, LLC                   |  | Delaware      
|fka Ameraset Assurance Group, LLC                               |  |               
|AssuranceAmerica Managing General Agency of Alabama Corporation |  | Alabama       
|AssuranceAmerica Insurance Company                              |  | South Carolina
|AssuranceAmerica Claims Services, LLC                           |  | Delaware      
|fka Ameraset Claims Services, LLC                               |  |               
|fka Ameraclaim Services, LLC                                    |  |               
|AssuranceAmerica Capital Trust I                                |  | Delaware      
|Trustway T.E.A.M., Inc.                                         |  | Georgia
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.6

                AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS OF
                          ASSURANCEAMERICA CORPORATION

                              ADOPTED JUNE 15, 2004

      1     The Amended and Restated By-laws of AssuranceAmerica Corporation, a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), are hereby amended by striking Section 6.1
thereof in its entirety and by replacing it with the following:

      Section 6.1 Number and Qualifications. The Board of Directors of the
      Corporation shall consist of at least one (1) but not more than ten (10)
      members, which number shall be determined, from time to time, by
      resolution adopted by the Board of Directors. Directors need not be
      residents of the State of Nevada or Shareholders of the Corporation.

      2     Except as hereby amended, the Amended and Restated By-laws of
AssuranceAmerica Corporation shall remain in full force and effect.

                                           /s/ Robert J. Cormican
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Robert J. Cormican, Secretary
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Lewis, Appellant.

[977 NYS2d 663]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered on or about July 20, 2011, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, DeGrasse, Freedman and Gische, JJ.
Exhibit 31(i)

CERTIFICATIONS

** 
I, Carolyn C. Shanks, certify that:  
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Entergy Mississippi, Inc.;  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:   
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   
b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;   
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

		/s/ Carolyn C. Shanks			

**
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

KATHY FUNTILA, AKA Kathy Retter,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 20

- 10441

D.C. No. 1:17

- cr

- 00515

- LEK

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2022 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Kathy Funtila appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her

second motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand

.

With respect to Funtila’s first motion for compassionate release, the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 10441

court concluded that (1) Funtila had failed to exhaust her administrative remedies,

but that her failure to exhaust was excused because exhaustion would have been

futile, and (2 ) Funtila had not shown extraordinary and compelling reasons for

compassionate release under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13. The court denied Funtila’s

second compassionate release motion, which it described as “almost identical to

her first motion,” because she had a gain failed to provide any extraordinary and

compelling reasons.

After the district court issued its orders , we decided United States v. Keller

,

2 F.4th 1278 ( 9th Cir. 2021 ) and United States v. Aruda , 993 F.3d 799 (9th Cir.

2021 )

. Because the district court did not have the benefit of these decisions when

it reviewed Funtila’s motions, we vacate the district court’s orders and remand for

the district court to reassess Funtila’s motion under the standards set forth in those

opinions

.

We offer n o view of the merits of Funtila’s request for compassionate

release

.

VACATED and REMANDED

.
***NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION***

***MICS CLASS II - AUDIT CHECKLIST***

***AUDITING REVENUE (ARV)***

Page 1 of 12
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               25,731
<SECURITIES>                                        102,003
<RECEIVABLES>                                        26,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                            979
<INVENTORY>                                          25,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    184,989
<PP&E>                                               54,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                       34,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      247,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                40,949
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 57
<OTHER-SE>                                          206,221
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        247,764
<SALES>                                              50,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     50,988
<CGS>                                                25,025
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        25,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     26,903
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       1,529
<INCOME-TAX>                                            245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   1,284
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          1,284
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.02




</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Daniel S. Tamkin, Chief Executive Officer of Synergx Systems certify
that:





1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Synergx Systems
Inc.;





2.  Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such  disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
and    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period cover by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)  Disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions);





a)
All significant deficiencies in material weakness the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a  significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.





Date:                      May
14, 2008




/s/DANIEL S. TAMKIN


Daniel S. Tamkin


Chief
Executive Officer