alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(e)

CERTIFICATIONS



I, E. Renae Conley, certify that:1.
I have reviewed these annual reports on Form 10-K of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and Entergy Louisiana, Inc.;2.
Based on my knowledge, these reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by these reports;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in these reports, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in these reports;4.
The registrants' other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrants, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which these reports are being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants' disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by these reports based on such evaluation;c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants' internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants' most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants' internal control over financial reporting; and5.
The registrants' other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants' auditors and the audit committee of the registrants' board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants' ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants' internal control over financial reporting.










|/s/ E. Renae ConleyE. Renae Conley
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of
Entergy Louisiana, Inc.; President and Chief Executive
Officer-Louisiana of Entergy Gulf States, Inc.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:	March 9, 2004
INTER
PARFUMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES





Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an
officer of Inter Parfums, Inc., that the Annual Report of Inter Parfums, Inc. on
Form 10-Qfor the period ended  March 31, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Inter Parfums,
Inc.





Date:
      May 8, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/ Jean MadarJean
      Madar,Chief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Inter Parfums, Inc. and will be retained by Inter Parfums, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
----

Exhibit 31.2 

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Ash, certify that:

(1) 

I have reviewedthis Form 10-QSB of The Tirex Corporation; 

(2) 

Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 

(3) 

Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

(4) 

The smallbusiness issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have: 

(a) 

Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) 

Evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

(c) 

Disclosed inthis report any change in the small business issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financialreporting; and 

(5) 

The smallbusiness issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thesmall business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small businessissuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) 

All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

(b) 

Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financialreporting. 

*/s/ Michael Ash, CFO           * Michael Ash, CFO 

Date: May 6, 2008 

----
Exhibit 23.1











INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT














We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Andrea Electronics Corporation on Form S-3 (333-114245, 333-69248, 333-51424, 333-83173, 333-61115), and Form S-8 (333-133090, 333-82738, 333-31946, 333-82375, 333-52129, 333-45421, 333-38609, 333-35687, 033-84092, 333-14385, 333-142548) of our report dated March 16, 2010 with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Andrea Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the years then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Andrea Electronics Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009.











/s/ Marcum LLP








Marcum LLP


Melville, New York


March 16, 2010
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-17-00387-CR

____________________

DUSTIN DANIEL HARDING, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 359th District Court 

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 16-04-04189-CR 

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Dustin Daniel Harding appeals his conviction of continuous sexual abuse of a 

child. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.02(b) (West Supp. 2018).1 A jury found 

Harding guilty and sentenced him to 75 years confinement. The attorney appointed 

to represent Harding in his appeal filed an Anders brief, which asserted that the 

attorney carefully reviewed the record and the law and found no meritorious claims 

 

1 We cite the current version of the statute as subsequent amendments do not 

affect our disposition.
2

on which he could argue Harding’s conviction should be reversed. After receiving 

Harding’s Anders brief, we granted an extension of time to allow Harding to file a 

pro se response. Harding requested an extension to file a pro se brief, and we granted 

his request. However, Harding did not file a brief with the court.

We have reviewed the record and agree with Harding’s counsel that no 

arguable issues exist to support an appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 

744–45 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 810–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); 

Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Therefore, it is not 

necessary that we appoint new counsel to rebrief Harding’s appeal. Cf. Stafford v. 

State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (requiring the court of appeals 

to appoint other counsel only if it determines that there were arguable grounds for 

the appeal). Given our conclusion that no arguable grounds exist to support 

Harding’s appeal, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.2

AFFIRMED.

_________________________

 CHARLES KREGER

 Justice

 

2 Harding may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for 

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
3

Submitted on December 4, 2018

Opinion Delivered January 30, 2019

Do Not Publish 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ
Exhibit 10.1a


Under the Company's 1999 Management Variable Incentive Plan, the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company,  with the approval of the Human  Resources  Committee of
the Board of Directors,  annually  designates  employees to  participate  in the
program,   establishes  their  participation   level,  and  establishes  certain
financial and operational goals for the Company which must be satisfied in order
for  variable  pay awards to be made.  The impact,  if any,  of each  employee's
performance  on  his or her  variable  pay  award  is  determined  by his or her
officer. Subject to final approval by the Human Resources Committee of the Board
of  Directors,  the Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company also  determines at
year-end the degree to which those goals have been  satisfied  and the amount of
variable pay to be awarded to participating employees, if any.
Exhibit 12.2
 ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(dollars in thousands)
 Twelve Months Ended December 31,2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005Earnings:Income from Continuing
Operations
    
    $
    251,225
    
    
    $
    262,344
    
    
    $
    283,940
    
    
    $
    269,730
    
    
    $
    170,479Income taxes
    
    
    152,574
    
    
    
    107,261
    
    
    
    151,157
    
    
    
    138,927
    
    
    
    98,010Fixed charges
    
    
    233,614
    
    
    
    213,583
    
    
    
    202,044
    
    
    
    191,174
    
    
    
    178,437Total earnings
    
    $
    637,413
    
    
    $
    583,188
    
    
    $
    637,141
    
    
    $
    599,831
    
    
    $
    446,926Fixed Charges:Interest charges
    
    $
    206,222
    
    
    $
    183,503
    
    
    $
    170,594
    
    
    $
    158,769
    
    
    $
    145,502Amortization of
debt discount
    
    
    4,675
    
    
    
    4,702
    
    
    
    4,639
    
    
    
    4,363
    
    
    
    4,085Estimated interest
portion
of annual rents
    
    
    22,717
    
    
    
    25,378
    
    
    
    26,811
    
    
    
    28,042
    
    
    
    28,850Total fixed charges
    
    $
    233,614
    
    
    $
    213,583
    
    
    $
    202,044
    
    
    $
    191,174
    
    
    $
    178,437Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
Charges (rounded down)
    
    
    2.72
    
    
    
    2.73
    
    
    
    3.15
    
    
    
    3.13
    
    
    
    2.50
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February 22, 2011 |   | /s/  Carrie L. Majeski                                                                                             |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   | Carrie L. Majeski, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(principal executive and financial officer) |
<PAGE>
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY
JUNE 30, 2003

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortis Benefits Insurance
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ Larry M. Cains
-----------------------------
Larry M. Cains
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2003







                                       16
Exhibit 31.6

CERTIFICATION

I, Anthony J. Kamerick, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Delmarva Power & Light Company; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                                      
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 5, 2012 |  | /s/ A. J. KAMERICK                                                   
|                    |  | Anthony J. Kamerick Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31(i)

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Jay A. Lewis, certify that:1.
I have reviewed these annual reports on Form 10-K of Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, Inc., Entergy Mississippi, Inc., and Entergy New Orleans, Inc.;2.
Based on my knowledge, these reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by these reports;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in these reports, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in these reports;4.
The registrants' other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrants, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which these reports are being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants' disclosure controls and procedures and presented in these reports our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by these reports based on such evaluation;c) Disclosed in these reports any change in the registrants' internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants' fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants' internal control over financial reporting; and5.
The registrants' other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants' auditors and the audit committee of the registrants' board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants' ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants' internal control over financial reporting.








|/s/ Jay A. LewisJay A. Lewis
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States, Inc.,
Entergy Louisiana, Inc., Entergy Mississippi, Inc.,
and Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:	March 9, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. CIGARETTE MERCHANDISERS ASSOCIATION, Inc., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Oct. 27, 1955.

See also 136 F.Supp. 214.

*498Richard B. O’Donnell, Sp. Asst, to the Atty. Gen., for the United States.

Mervin C. Poliak, New York City, for defendant Cigarette Merchandisers Ass’n, Inc.

NOONAN, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendants in the above entitled action for a preliminary hearing under Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., or in the alternative, for a separate trial under Rule 42(b) of said Rules, of the jurisdictional issue of interstate commerce.

Defendants are a trade association of cigarette vending machine operators engaged in the New York Metropolitan Area, defined in the complaint as “the City of New York and the counties of Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Putnam and Rockland”; five corporate members of defendant trade association; Local 805, a labor union whose members are employed by members of defendant trade association; and certain individuals respectively connected with these defendants.

The complaint in this action was filed on April 28, 1954. On the same date a companion criminal indictment No. C 144-105 was also filed. In essence the same violations of the Sherman AntiTrust Act, Title 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 and 2, are charged.

In view of the pendency of the criminal indictment, it is urged by the government that the granting of this motion at this time would have the effect of permitting the defendants to obtain the government’s entire case on the issue of interstate commerce, prior to the trial of the criminal indictment. With this contention I cannot disagree. Furthermore, the granting of this motion would be tantamount to compelling the government to produce its witnesses prior to trial and permitting the taking of their depositions on an issue vital to it in the proof of its criminal action.

It seems to me that the net effect of the filing by the government of a criminal indictment contemporaneously with the institution of a civil anti-trust suit, where the same violations are charged in each case, results, for all practical purposes, in a suspension of certain of the defendants’ rights that they might otherwise have available to them, in the civil action, under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This appears to be the end result of the decisions dealing with this problem.

However, I can readily understand the government’s aversion to proceeding to a trial of the issue of interstate commerce in the civil action at this time, in view of the imminence of the trial of the criminal indictment. The government assures the court in its papers on this motion that the criminal action will be prosecuted diligently and I have no reason to believe otherwise.

Therefore, the defendants’ motion is denied without prejudice to its being renewed upon the disposition of the criminal indictment.

Settle order.
#### INVERNESS MEDICAL SWITZERLAND GMBH, and Unipath Diagnostics, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ACON LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-1135.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 29, 2006.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph M. Rigby, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Pepco Holdings, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                             
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 5, 2012 |  | /s/ JOSEPH M. RIGBY                                         
|                    |  | Joseph M. Rigby                                             
|                    |  | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer