alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5

<LEGEND>             THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
                     EXTRACTED   FROM  ASHLAND   INC.'S  ANNUAL  REPORT  TO
                     SHAREHOLDERS  FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30,
                     2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
                     SUCH ANNUAL REPORT.

<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      67
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            1,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                                25
<INVENTORY>                                                488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         2,131
<PP&E>                                                   2,879
<DEPRECIATION>                                           1,457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           6,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    1,699
<BONDS>                                                  1,899
<COMMON>                                                    70
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                               1,895
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             6,771
<SALES>                                                  7,961
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         8,436
<CGS>                                                    6,671
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            6,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            483
<INCOME-TAX>                                               191
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        292
<DISCONTINUED>                                            (218)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             (4)
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                70
<EPS-BASIC>                                                .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .98


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,857; TA-W-65,857A; TA-W-65,857B]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 28, 2009, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Steelcase, Inc., Kellwood, Michigan (TA-W-65,857), Steelcase University, Grand Rapids, Michigan (TA-W-65,857A), and Steelcase, Inc., Caledonia, Michigan (TA-W-65,857B).

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of May, 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13466 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,730,563
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    183,549
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         414,531
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,064,656
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,393,299
<COMMON>                                       178,162
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    1,195,625
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            601,968
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,975,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,401
<PREFERRED>                                     85,840
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,876,540
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 178,830
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  164,378
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,102,555
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,393,299
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,006,398
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           192,207
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,443,380
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,635,587
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        370,811
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              20,448
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 391,259
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       136,012
<NET-INCOME>                                   255,247
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      9,703
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  245,544
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       170,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      116,213
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         512,976
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Aimee Mutanda BATATA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-60286

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 19, 2006.

Peter Tatih Ndikum, Silver Spring, MD, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Linda Susan Wendtland, Saul Greenstein, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigra*436tion Litigation, Washington, DC, Anne M. Estrada, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Dallas, TX, Caryl G. Thompson, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, District Directors Office, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

Alberto R. Gonzalez, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pro se.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Aimee Mutanda Batata, a native and citizen of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), petitions this court for review of an order denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) summarily affirmed the denial of relief by the Immigration Judge (IJ).

Batata contends that the BIA and IJ erred by determining (1) that her claim of rape was not credible and (2) that, had she been raped, she did not show a well-founded fear of persecution or that it was more likely than not that she would be subjected to torture if she returned to the DRC. The inconsistencies and ambiguities in the evidence support the decision of the IJ. Because the record does not compel a finding that Batata was entitled to any of the relief she sought, Batata has failed to show that the decision was not supported by substantial evidence. *See INS v. EliasZacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992); *Faddoul v. INS,*37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir.1994).; *Efe v. Ashcroft,*293 F.3d 899, 906-07 (5th Cir. 2002).

Batata’s petition for review therefore is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Office of Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Washington.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Washington*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 541.]

(No. 96-2787

Submitted February 19, 1997

Decided June 11, 1997.)

*542
      *Geoffrey Stem,*Disciplinary Counsel, and *Stacy Solochek,*Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

*William T. Washington, pro se.*

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. By engaging a co-counsel without determining whether he would be able to perform his duties, respondent neglected the legal matter entrusted to him by the court. By being less than honest in his reasons for time extensions, respondent engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. *543Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months. Costs are taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would publicly reprimand respondent.
Exhibit 99.2


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") by Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.




                                              /s/ Michael D. Price
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Michael D. Price
                                              Vice President, Chief Financial
                                              Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
                                              (Chief financial officer)

                                              November 4, 2002
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable H. D. Garrett 

County Attorney 

Rains county 

Iiaory,~ Texes 

Dem se: 

. .~, 

ed 14 your latter OS 

rabla f3ar8ia 0. Yann, 

upon rhioh you his &spartment . 

ndent) arslatant superihgenoy and haa soma aohool 

e poliotas having been 

M abslatant euporlntendexpire prior to 1945, 

loited aohool lnsukanoe 

Siioe, nor doce ho propose to solloit 

hila in offlae. A queetion has been 

ether he may Pagally serve as asslstIMendent and om the agenoy, having 

in ioroe, oovering sohool builUlngs, 

to his induotlon into 0frh.w 

‘6e essume the assietant superintendent referred to 

was employ& by virtue of the authority vested in the County 

Superintep&ent unbar Artiole 2700 Revised Civil Statutes, 1926. 
669 

Honorable Ii. D. Garrett, pace 2 

Such an assistant oontemplated under this statute was held to 

be one whose duties are to be performed lo oonneotion with, end 

under the direotion of the superintendent. Neeper vs. Stewart, 

66 S. X. (2d) 812. 

The faot that an assistaut owns an insursnoe egenoy 

through whloh the Insurance on aohool property is written prior 

to his employment by the County Superintendent, suoh would note :~ 

eonetltute the employrent illegal nor prohibit the owner of the 

agency from legally performing the Unties or his employment as 

aesletant County Superintendent. 

Under your iaots aubmitteb, it 1s therefore the opinion 

of this department that your question be and It 16 answered in. 

the aiflnnatlre.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from Balance Sheet,
Statement of Operations, Statement of Cash Flows and Notes thereto incorporated
in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          62,552
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          922,632
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,325
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,394
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,014,351)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,079
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,357  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (42,436)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (42,436)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (42,456)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
97-47.

#### State ex rel. Jenkins v. Orient Correctional Inst.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents and would grant on the merits.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY**

The following are wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries of Credence Systems Corporation:

Credence Systems KK, a Japanese company;

Credence Systems International, Inc., a Barbados corporation;

Fluence Technology, Inc. (formerly Test Systems Strategies, Inc.), a Delaware corporation;

Opmaxx, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Fluence Technology, Inc.);

Credence International Limited, Inc., a Delaware corporation;

Credence Systems Korea, a South Korea company (a wholly owned subsidiary of Credence International Limited, Inc.);

Credence Systems Armenia L.L.C., an Armenian limited liability company; and

Innotech-Credence Corporation, a Japanese company (a joint venture with Innotech Corporation, majority owned by the Company).

TMT, Inc., a California corporation (in the process of being merged with Credence);

Modulations Instruments, Inc., a Colorado corporation;

NewMillennia Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation;

NewMillennia Solutions LLC, a California limited liability company;

Credence Europa Limited, a private limited company in the United Kingdom;

Credence Systems (UK) Limited, a private limited company in the United Kingdom (a wholly owned subsidiary of Credence Europa Limited);

Credence Systems Europe GmbH, a German corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of Credence Europa Limited);

Dimensions Consulting, Inc., a California corporation. 

****
#### Jorge Rene GARCIA GUEVARA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73918.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 2006.*

Filed Dec. 8, 2006.

*692Susan E. Hill, Hill & Piibe, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Jason K. Axe, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil *&*Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jonathan F. Potter, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Jorge Rene Garcia Guevara, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s order denying Garcia Guevara’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence, *Ochoa v. Gonzales,*406 F.3d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir.2005), we deny the petition for review.

Garcia Guevara testified that in 1988 members of an unidentified group attempted to recruit him, threatening harm to him and his family if he refused to join. Contrary to Garcia Guevara’s contention, neither his testimony nor any other evidence in the record compels the conclusion that he was or would be targeted on account of a statutorily protected ground. *See id.*at 1171-72. Consequently, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Garcia Guevara is not eligible for asylum or -withholding of removal. *See id.*at 1172.

The BIA properly denied Garcia Guevara CAT relief because he failed to present evidence that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured by Guatemalan officials or anyone acting with their acquiescence. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LUMBERFIOUS DEANDRE ARNOLD, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-911 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 26, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Frank Quesada, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia Richards, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 7, 2021

NO. 03-20-00406-CV

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas; and

Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellants

v.

Texas Westmoreland Coal Co., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on June 17, 2020. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Appellants shall pay all costs 

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
96-2780.

#### State ex rel. King v. Bond.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12959]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending May 23, 
2009

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1383 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0123.
    Date Filed: May 20, 2009.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:
     PSC/RESO/143 dated 6 February 2009.
     Finally Adopted Resolutions & Recommended Practices r1-r44.
     PSC/MINS/026 dated 6 February 2009.
     Minutes.
    Intended effective date: 1 June 2009.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisiory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Alternate Federal 
Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E9-12959 Filed 6-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P