alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I,
John A. Poserina, Chief Financial Officer of Synergx Systems certify
that:
 
 1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Synergx Systems
Inc.;
 
 2.  Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such  disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this quarterly
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period cover by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 
 c)  Disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a)
All significant deficiencies in material weakness the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a  significant  role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date:      May
14, 2008
  /s/JOHN A. POSERINA
 John A. Poserina
 Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60822 Summary Calendar

SHAHILA SABJAALI MAREDIA,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

------------------------------------------------------------------ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A95 421 317

------------------------------------------------------------------

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Shahila Sabjaali Maredia, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration A

ppeals’(BIA’s) summary affirmance of the denial of her requests for asylum,

withholding of r emo val, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). In light of the

BIA’s summary affirmance, we review the immigration judge’s decision. S ee Mikhael v. INS , 115

F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997).-2-

Maredia fails to show that substantial evidence supports that she has an objective fear of being

persecuted if she returns to India. She has not shown that she will be singled out for persecution if

she returns or t hat t here is a pattern of discrimination against Muslims that she cannot avoid by

moving to another part of the country. See Zhao v. Gonzales , 409 F.3d 306-07 (5th Cir. 2005); 8

C.F.R. § 203.13(b)(2)(iii); Eduard v. Ashcroft , 379 F.3d 182, 193-94 (5th Cir. 2004).

Because Maredia did not make the showing required to establish eligibilit y for asylum, she

cannot meet the more stringent standard necessary to establish eligibilit y for withholding of removal.

See Efe v. Ashcroft , 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 2002). Nor does the record compel a finding that

Maredia met her burden of showing that more likely than not she would be tortured if she returned

to India, such that she is entitled to relief under the CAT. See Bah v. Ashcroft

, 341 F.3d 348, 352

(5th Cir. 2003).

Accordingly, Maredia’s petition for review is DENIED.
**Appendix 1**

**Fire and Aviation Preparedness Review Guide**

**Suggested Drill**

**Skill #01*Fire and Aviation Preparedness Review Guide***

**Vehicle Inspection and Equipment Location**

April 2000

A-

Skill 1-1Revised 2008
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RUTH STAIRS, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee. No. 11-17240 D.C. No. 1:10-cv-00132-DLB
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dennis L. Beck, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Submitted May 10, 2013 **

San Francisco, California Before: W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Ruth Stairs, a successful Social Secu rity benefits claimant, appeals the district court’s reduction of her request for attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). We review a district court’s denial of 

# FILED
JUN 10 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 attorneys’ fees under the EAJA for abuse of discretion. See Lewis v. Barnhart , 281 F.3d 1081, 1083 (9th Cir. 2002). We ha ve jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. In its denial or reduction of attorneys’ fees, the district court must offer a clear and concise explanation, but the expl anation does not need to be elaborate. Moreno v. City of Sacramento , 534 F.3d 1106, 1111 (9th Cir. 2008). A district court has “substantial discretion in fi xing the amount of an EAJA award.” Comm’r, INS v. Jean , 496 U.S. 154, 163 (1990). Here, the magistrate judge adequately explained his reasoning for reducing attorney Sengthiene Bosavanh’s fees for reviewing various documents, duplicating work, and preparing EAJA time sheets. Healso adequately explained his reasons for reducing attorney Ralph Wilborn’s fees for preparing the opening and reply briefs and the EAJA time sheets. The magistrate judge appropriately recognized that many issues from the Confidential Letter Brief likely overlapped with the issues raised in the opening and reply brie fs, reducing the time necessary to prepare those briefs. The magistrate judge was in a better position to judge the reasonableness of the time requested becau se he was familiar with the attorneys’ work product. Hensley v. Eckerhart , 461 U.S. 424, 437 (1983) (district court has significant discretion due to its “superi or understanding of the litigation and the3 desirability of avoiding freque nt appellate review of what essentially are factual matters”). AFFIRMED.
Northwest area (with ATNI Conference)

Double Tree by Hilton (Portland)

Helens Room

1000 Multnomah Street

Portland, OR 97232

May 25, 2017

1:30 – 5:30 pm

I. Welcome and Opening prayer/Blessing.

II. Introduction of Commission and brief statements.

III. Introduction of NIGC Staff and Tribal leadership and representatives.

IV. Discuss format for the consultation

o Questions/comments will be taken after each topic presentation.

V. Opening statements/comments for those who cannot stay for the entire consultation.

VI. Housekeeping items

o Scheduled to go to 5:30 pm – however may end early if all topics covered and 

there is no tribal comments

o Meeting will be transcribed, when speaking please state name/organization and 

designees from your tribal governments – not open to the public or media.

VII. Topic order

1. Rural Outreach

2. Developing a Strong Tribal Workforce through Training

3. Management Contract Regulations and Procedures

4. Technical Standards for Mobile Gaming Devices

5. Fees

6. Draft guidance in accordance with Tribal comments received for voluntary nonbinding Class III minimum internal control standards (MICS) and regulatory 

changes as a result of the 2015-16 consultation.

VIII. Comment period will end July 1, 2017.

Page 1 of 1
STATEMENT OF THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS INDIAN RESERVATION OF 

OREGON CONCERNING INDIAN GAMING MATTERS

NIGC – STRATEGIC PLAN FOR FY 2014-2018

OCTOBER 31, 2012

ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

TO: Chairwoman Tracie Stevens

Vice-Chair, Steffani Cochran

Commissioner Daniel Little

The Warm Springs Gaming Commission would like to present the following concern and official 

comments on behalf of the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Indian Reservation of Oregon to 

the National Indian Gaming Commission on the following issue:

STRATEGIC PLAN FOR FY 2014-2018

In response to the proposed Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2014-2018, the Warm Springs Gaming 

Commission has the following concerns:

Page 8 – Goal 4 and Page 10 – Supporting Performance Measures

The language “tribal, federal and state regulatory agencies and authorities...” is of grave concern.

The Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs (CTWS) and the Warm Springs Gaming Commission (WSGC) 

maintain that the WSGC is the regulatory agency for the CTWS and the Tribally owned casino. 

The WSGC maintains that the Oregon State Police – Tribal Gaming Section are an oversight agency and 

are not “regulators;” which is clearly defined within the Tribal/State Compact which states “the Tribe 

and the State agree that the State functions of monitoring and oversight of tribal gaming operations...”

The CTWS and the WSGC recommend that the language be modified to read “tribal regulatory 

authorities, federal and state agencies.” This minor change maintains the integrity and sovereignty of 

the Tribes. 

Please forward written responses to:

Pamela Douglas, Chairman

Warm Springs Gaming Commission

PO Box 1590

Warm Springs, OR 97761

pam.oaks@wstribes.org
# Great Outdoors Month, 2009 

 The United States is blessed with unparalleled natural beauty. From remote forests to urban parks, these spaces have inspired visitors for generations. Today, these areas continue to raise the human spirit in those who experience them. During the month of June, I encourage Americans to pay tribute to and preserve the great outdoors.

 Americans of all ages can find calm and enjoyment in our Nation’s vast outdoors. Those desiring quiet or solitude can explore one of our many National Parks, which offer tranquil and pristine surroundings. Those seeking recreation can also explore public lands, or they can simply run, bicycle, or fish in areas close to their homes. Whether near or far, the outdoors offers unique experiences.

 Exploring the great outdoors can also help improve one’s health. These spaces provide countless venues for walking, hiking, running, swimming, and boating, among other activities. Americans can combine the enjoyment of being outside with the exercise we all need to stay healthy.

 My Administration is working to connect America’s youth with our treasured landscapes, which should be viewed as classrooms for environmental education and gateways to careers in natural resources. These efforts will include outreach to those who typically lack representation in, and exposure to, these fields. The Department of the Interior is launching a summer mentoring initiative as part of this effort. This program invites families and friends to teach children about the joys and wonders of the outdoors. My Administration is also increasing the number of youth involved in national service on public lands. Through AmeriCorps and other programs and partnerships, we can continue our Nation’s proud tradition of service and respect for the environment.

 Americans are fortunate to have so many beautiful natural wonders and open spaces. I encourage all in our Nation to enjoy these resources and to help protect them for future generations. Together, we can carry forward our Nation’s proud tradition of admiration and preservation of the great outdoors.

 NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2009 as Great Outdoors Month. I encourage all Americans to spend more time outside and to participate in the nationwide events marking this occasion.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this first day of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.

[FR Doc. E9-13283

Billing code 3195-W9-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2763 

To terminate the preemption of State and local laws that prohibit or regulate 

gaming or the operation of bucket shops, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2009 

Ms. CANTWELL (for herself, Mr. WYDEN, and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To terminate the preemption of State and local laws that 

prohibit or regulate gaming or the operation of bucket 

shops, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF PREEMPTION OF STATE AND 

4 LOCAL LAWS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 12(e) of the Commodity 

6 Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 16(e)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking paragraph (2); and 

8 (2) in paragraph (1)— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2763 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘(1) Nothing’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘Nothing’’; 

3 (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) 

4 through (C) as paragraphs (1) through (3), re5 spectively, and indenting appropriately; and 

6 (C) in paragraph (2) (as redesignated by 

7 subparagraph (B))— 

8 (i) by redesignating clauses (i) 

9 through (iii) as subparagraphs (A) through 

10 (C), respectively, and indenting appro11 priately; and 

12 (ii) in the matter preceding subpara13 graph (A) (as redesignated by clause (i)), 

14 by striking ‘‘(except as provided in para15 graph (2))’’. 

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2(e)(1) of 

17 the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 2(e)(1)) is 

18 amended by striking ‘‘(other than section 12(e)(2)(B))’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than June 23, 2009.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Steve Foley, Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:                

*1. Jessie Doyle Buffington*; Helmut Hans Cawthon; Kenneth Franklin Davis; Clinton Gray Hubbard; Stephen Curtis Klasson; Kimberly Gill Mauer; Laura Hallin Mumber; Matthew Peter Mumber; Delos Harley Yancey, III; John Demetrius Xanthos, all of Rome, Georgia; Andrew Charles Heaner, Atlanta, Georgia; Wayne Elm Vick, Armuchee, Georgia; and Delos Harley Yancey Jr., Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida; collectively to acquire additional voting shares of Heritage First Bancshares, Inc., Rome, Georgia, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Heritage First Bank, Rome, Georgia, and Heritage First Bank, Orange Beach, Alabama.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 3, 2009.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-13292 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EXHIBIT 12
                                ASHLAND INC.
             COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                               (In millions)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                       Years ended September 30
                                                      -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                          2000         2001        2002         2003        2004
                                                      ---------   ----------   ---------   ----------   ---------
<S>                                                   <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>
EARNINGS

Income from continuing operations                     $    272    $     390    $    115    $      94    $    398
Income taxes                                               179          266          68           44         150
Interest expense                                           189          160         133          121         112
Interest portion of rental expense                          39           40          35           33          35
Amortization of deferred debt expense                        2            2           2            2           2
Distributions in excess of (less than) earnings
    of unconsolidated affiliates                          (113)         (91)         20          (98)       (263)
                                                      ---------   ----------   ---------   ----------   ---------
                                                      $    568    $     767    $    373    $     196    $    434
                                                      =========   ==========   =========   ==========   =========

FIXED CHARGES

Interest expense                                      $    189    $     160    $    133    $     121    $    112
Interest portion of rental expense                          39           40          35           33          35
Amortization of deferred debt expense                        2            2           2            2           2
                                                      ---------   ----------   ---------   ----------   ---------
                                                      $    230    $     202    $    170    $     156    $    149
                                                      =========   ==========   =========   ==========   =========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                        2.47         3.80        2.19         1.26        2.91

</TABLE>
#### Edward J. Len, as Administrator of the Estate of Michael E. Len, Deceased, Appellant, v State of New York et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 16, 2010;

decided November 23, 2010

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that portion of the Court of Claims order that denied appellant’s motion to amend the claim, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.