NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop #1621 Washington, DC 20240 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 WWW.NIGC.GOV

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK; Oklahoma City, OK

August 16, 2021

Kerry Patterson

Procopio

525 B Street, Suite 2200

San Diego, CA 92101

Re: Review of the Loan Documents for the Tule River Indian Tribe

Dear Ms. Patterson:

This letter responds to your July 16, 2021 request on behalf of the Tule River Tribe 

Gaming Authority of the Tule River Indian Tribe for the Office of the General Counsel, National 

Indian Gaming Commission, to review certain loan documents. The request asks for my opinion 

as to whether the submitted loan documents are management contracts requiring the NIGC 

Chairman’s approval pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. The request also asks for 

my opinion as to whether the loan documents violate IGRA’s requirement that a tribe have the 

sole proprietary interest in its gaming operation. 

In my review, I considered the following submissions (collectively, “the Loan 

Documents”):

• Credit Agreement, marked “US.132695004.06”;

• Exhibits A-1 and A-2 to the Credit Agreement, marked “US.132807315.02”;

• Security Agreement, marked “US.132816255.03”;

• Deposit Account Control Agreement - Keybank, marked “NIGC SUBMISSION 

DRAFT (07/16/2021)”;

• Deposit Account Control Agreement – Wells Fargo, marked “US.133423815.02”; 

and

• Guaranty, marked “US.132819637.04”.

The Loan Documents contain terms similar to other agreements that OGC has previously 

reviewed and analyzed. Some of these opinion letters may be found on the NIGC’s website. 

Applying the same analysis here, it is my opinion that, collectively, the Loan Documents are not 

management contracts and do not require the approval of the NIGC Chairman. It is also my 

opinion that they do not violate IGRA’s sole proprietary interest requirement.
Kerry Patterson

Re: Review of the Loan Documents for the 

 Tule River Indian Tribe

August 16, 2021

Page 2 of 2

It is my understanding that the Loan Documents are represented to be in substantially 

final form, and any further changes will not be material to OGC’s analysis. This opinion shall not 

apply if the Loan Documents change in any material way prior to closing or are inconsistent with 

assumptions made herein. Further, this opinion is limited to the Loan Documents listed above 

and does not include or extend to any other agreements.

Please note that it is my intent that this letter be released to the public through the 

NIGC’s website. If you have any objection to this disclosure, please provide a written statement 

explaining the grounds for the objection and highlighting the information that you believe should 

be withheld.1 If you object on the grounds that the information qualifies as confidential 

commercial information subject to withholding under Exemption Four of the Freedom of 

Information Act (FOIA),2 please be advised that any withholding should be analyzed under the 

standard set forth in Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media.

3 Any claim of 

confidentiality should also be supported with “a statement or certification by an officer or 

authorized representative of the submitter.”4 Please submit any written objection to 

FOIASubmitterReply@nigc.gov within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. After this 

time elapses, the letter will be made public and objections will no longer be considered.5 If you 

need any additional guidance regarding potential grounds for withholding, please see the United 

States Department of Justice’s Guide to the Freedom of Information Act at 

https://www.justice.gov/oip/doj-guide-freedom-information-act-0. 

If you have any questions, please contact Senior Attorney Austin Badger at (202) 632-

7003. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Hoenig

General Counsel

 1 See 25 C.F.R. § 517.7(c). 2 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4).

3 139 S. Ct. 2356 (2019).

4 See 25 C.F.R. § 517.7(d). 5 Id.