alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2980 

To protect the democratic process and the right of the people of the District 

of Columbia to define marriage. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2010 

Mr. BENNETT (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. WICKER, Mr. VITTER, Mr. 

ENZI, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. HATCH) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To protect the democratic process and the right of the people 

of the District of Columbia to define marriage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds that— 

5 (1) a broad coalition of residents of the District 

6 of Columbia petitioned for an initiative in accord7 ance with the District of Columbia Home Rule Act 

8 to establish that ‘‘only marriage between a man and 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2980 IS

1 a woman is valid or recognized in the District of Co2 lumbia’’; 

3 (2) this petition anticipated the Council of the 

4 District of Columbia’s passage of an Act legalizing 

5 same-sex marriage; 

6 (3) the unelected District of Columbia Board of 

7 Elections and Ethics and the unelected District of 

8 Columbia Superior Court thwarted the residents’ ini9 tiative effort to define marriage democratically, hold10 ing that the initiative amounted to discrimination 

11 prohibited by the District of Columbia Human 

12 Rights Act; and 

13 (4) the definition of marriage affects every per14 son and should be debated openly and democrat15 ically. 

16 SEC. 2. REFERENDUM OR INITIATIVE REQUIREMENT. 

17 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including 

18 the District of Columbia Human Rights Act, the govern19 ment of the District of Columbia shall not issue a mar20 riage license to any couple of the same sex until the people 

21 of the District of Columbia have the opportunity to hold 

22 a referendum or initiative on the question of whether the 

23 District of Columbia should issue same-sex marriage li24 censes. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Hyman Harvey KLEIN, Isifor J. Klein, Albert McLennan, George Norgan, Ellis Rosenberg, Maurice Haas, Irving A. Koerner, Morris O. Alprin and Albert Roer, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

April 12, 1955.

See also, D.C., 131 F.Supp. 807.

*440J. Edward Lumbard, U. S. Atty., New York City, for United States, Arnold Bauman, Arthur Brooks, Asst. U. S. Attys., New York City, of counsel.

Louis Bender, New York City, for defendant Haas.

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

The defendant Haas seeks discovery and inspection of statements voluntarily made by him as answers to questions put to him by a special agent of the Intelligence Division of the Bureau of Internal Revenue prior to his indictment. A stenographer transcribed the questions and answers. Defendant’s request for a copy was then denied unless he would be later requested to sign the transcript, which he was never asked to do.

It is manifest that the requisites of Fed.Rules Crim.Proc. rule 16, 18 U.S. C.A., are here presented:1

(a) the statements were “obtained from” Haas;

(b) they are “material to the preparation of his defense” and

(c) the “request is reasonable”.

In view of the foregoing, no opinion is expressed as to defendant’s further contention that he is entitled to the relief sought under 5 U.S.C.A. § 1005(b).

Motion granted.

Enter an order complying with the last sentence of F.R.Crim.P. 16.

1

. United States v. Peace, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 16 F.R.D. 423.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

PHILLIP S. CARPENTER, 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

In her official capacity as Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant 

Civil Action No. 13-01637 (CKK/GMH) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 (March 14, 2016) 

 On February 24, 2016, the Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey’s Report and 

Recommendation was entered, and the parties were allowed 14 days to file objections to 

the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections have been filed as of 

this date. Upon careful consideration of the record in this case and of Magistrate Judge 

Harvey’s [24] Report and Recommendation, the Court ADOPTS and ACCEPTS the 

Report and Recommendation in full. 

The Court shall GRANT Plaintiff’s [15] Motion for Judgment of Reversal and DENY 

Defendant’s [18] Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Court shall vacate the 

Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff disability benefits, and remand the matter 

back to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings, which may include 

the taking of additional testimony to resolve the conflict between the vocational expert’s 

testimony and the information provided by the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. 

An appropriate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. 

 /s/ 

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY 

United States District Judge
**Helicopter UnitChecklist #15**

**Helicopter UnitChecklist # 15**

For the National Preparedness Review you will need to have the following items available for review.

**15-1Revised 2010**

**15-9 Revised 2010**
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26724-26725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12856]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3304-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Minnesota; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Minnesota (FEMA-3304-EM), dated March 26, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 22, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective May 22, 2009.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance

[[Page 26725]]

(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation 
Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-12856 Filed 6-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 

Office of Fire and Aviation 

Operations Alert 

No. 05-03 August 4, 2005 

Subject: Use of Personnel Protective Equipment (PPE) 

Area of Concern: Appropriate attire for the ATGS, Fire Recon/Detection Mission and the use of 

shoulder harnesses. 

Discussion: 

Recent events have heightened awareness on how personnel are choosing to dress for the 

above mentioned missions; it is common to observe employees in casual dress (shorts and 

sandals). The Interagency Standards for Fire and Aviation Operations chapter 17 states that 

for fixed wing operations above 500 feet PPE is recommended. This is our current policy, 

which will be reviewed prior to the 2006 fire season. 

In the interim it is strongly recommended that personnel performing these missions protect 

themselves from potential unnecessary injury by wearing leather shoes or boots and a flight 

suit or full length cotton or nomex trousers. 

Recent events have also highlighted the positive effects of fully utilizing the shoulder 

harnesses which are required in the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR), DM 351 1.1 G and 

the Aviation Life Support Equipment Handbook 4-4.2. Incidents and accidents, although 

rare, do occur. Please help yourselves be as prepared as possible. 

For additional information contact 

Joe Bates, DOI, BLM (208) 387-5879 Cell (208) 830-1634 

Sean Cross, DOI, BLM (208) 387-5444 Cell (208) 867-0285
Exhibit
23




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-136432  on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 28, 2008
relating to the financial statements (and with respect to the report on those
financial statements, expressed an unqualified opinion and included an
explanatory paragraph concerning the adoption of new accounting pronouncements
in 2006 and 2007) and financial statement schedule of Appalachian Power Company
and subsidiaries appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Appalachian Power Company and subsidiaries for the year ended
December 31, 2007.












/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP




Columbus,
Ohio


February
28, 2008
#### Robert H. Hamilton et al., Respondents, v David Murphy, Appellant.

Submitted April 4, 2011;

decided May 5, 2011

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*16 NY3d 794 (2011)].
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2720 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2720

        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1, 1, 2-2-
               Tetrafluoroethene, oxidized, polymerized.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1, 1, 2-2-
               Tetrafluoroethene, oxidized, polymerized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1, 1, 2-2-TETRAFLUOROETHENE, OXIDIZED, POLYMERIZED.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.14 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP VI-A FOR
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0              
<SECURITIES>                                         0              
<RECEIVABLES>                                  426,873        
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0              
<INVENTORY>                                          0              
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,114,380        
<PP&E>                                      19,762,996     
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,913,379               
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,963,967             
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,123,329      
<BONDS>                                      9,647,728      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                      
<PREFERRED>                                          0              
<COMMON>                                             0  
<OTHER-SE>                                           0              
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,963,967            
<SALES>                                              0                      
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,024,961              
<CGS>                                                0              
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,314,919      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,985         
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0              
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             441,382        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (355,943)              
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0              
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0              
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                      
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                      
<CHANGES>                                            0              
<NET-INCOME>                                  (355,943)      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.19)          
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0               
                                                                    
                                           

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1768

LESTER MOODY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BALTIMORE CITY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES STATE OF 

MARYLAND,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00488-ELH)

Submitted: October 18, 2018 Decided: October 22, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KEENAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lester Moody, Appellant Pro Se. Elise Song Kurlander, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lester Moody appeals the district court’s order granting the Baltimore City 

Department of Social Services’ motion to dismiss Moody’s civil complaint, which 

asserted claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. 

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2018); Title IX of the Education Amendments 

of 1972, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 to 1688 (2012); and the Maryland Fair Employment Practices 

Act, Md. Code Ann., State Gov’t § 20-606(a)(1)(i) (West 2014). We have reviewed the 

record and considered the parties’ arguments. Finding no reversible error, we affirm the 

district court’s order. See Moody v. Baltimore City Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 1:18-cv00488-ELH (D. Md. June 25, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000006879
<NAME> APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,031,989
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     35,467
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         332,776
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        41,975
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 441,223
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,883,430
<COMMON>                                       260,458
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      613,048
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            207,544
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,081,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           22,310
<PREFERRED>                                     19,747
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,415,026
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              33,700
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  96,600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   79,509
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     48,552
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                11,558
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,075,378
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,883,430
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,720,010
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            67,421
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,412,595
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,480,016
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        239,994
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (222)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 239,772
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       119,258
<NET-INCOME>                                   120,514
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      7,006
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  113,508
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       114,436
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       81,009
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         280,513
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 108 (Monday, June 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13292]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 23, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Jessie Doyle Buffington; Helmut Hans Cawthon; Kenneth Franklin 
Davis; Clinton Gray Hubbard; Stephen Curtis Klasson; Kimberly Gill 
Mauer; Laura Hallin Mumber; Matthew Peter Mumber; Delos Harley Yancey, 
III; John Demetrius Xanthos, all of Rome, Georgia; Andrew Charles 
Heaner, Atlanta, Georgia; Wayne Elm Vick, Armuchee, Georgia; and Delos 
Harley Yancey Jr., Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida; collectively to acquire 
additional voting shares of Heritage First Bancshares, Inc., Rome, 
Georgia, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of 
Heritage First Bank, Rome, Georgia, and Heritage First Bank, Orange 
Beach, Alabama.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 3, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-13292 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
97-64.

#### State v. Patterson.

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 69551, 69552 and 69553.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0115

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ALEXANDER KIM TORPPE,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until June 18, 2021, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

May 20 2021

05/20/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0115
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00403-CV

In re Cleo Petricek

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Filed: August 27, 2021
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2644 

To suspend temporarily the duty on high pressure fuel pump. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on high pressure fuel pump. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HIGH PRESSURE FUEL PUMP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 High pressure fuel pumps for 

gasoline/ethanol direct injection fuel systems capable of 

delivering fuel at pressures of 

3.5 MPa or more and but not 

over 12 MPa (provided for in 

subheading 8413.30.90) ........ 1.3% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2644 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.8

CERTIFICATION

I, Anthony J. Kamerick, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Atlantic City Electric Company; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                            
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: March 5, 2012 |  | /s/ A. J. KAMERICK                         
|                    |  | Anthony J. Kamerick Chief
Financial Officer