Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circumstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 50097 c o ns o l i da t e d wi t h N o. 09- 50098 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t if f
- A pp el l ee v. I GNACI O S OLI S
- GARCIA , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp eal s f

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e W est ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 3 : 0 0 - CR- 1 3 0 7 - ALL U SDC N o . 3 : 0 8 - CR- 2 9 3 5 - ALL B ef ore K IN G , ST E W A R T an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IAM: * Igna ci o Soli s- G arci a ( S ol i s) il l egally t ri ed to reenter t h e U n t i ed States w h i l e on su pervi sed rel ease af t er i m pri so n m en tf

or a pri or il l egal- reentry vi o l at i o n. H e pl e ad e d g uil t y t o a t t e m pt e d il l e ga lr e e nt r y af t e rde po r t at i o n, a nd h i s s u pervi sed rel ease w as revoked . Sol i s w as sentenced to a 60 - m on t h pri son t erm f or il l egal reentry, w h i ch w as 14 m on t h s above the gu i del i n es r an ge. For United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I LE D November

2, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o . 0 9 -5 0 0 9 7 c/w N o. 09- 50098

2 vi ol at i ng t he t er m s of hi s su p erv i se d r el eas e, Soli s r ec eived a c ons ec ut ive 24- m o nt h s e nt e nc e , w hi c h was w i t hi n t he g u i del i ne s r ang e . So l i s c hall e nge s t he a b o v e -g u id e lin e s s e n te n c e fo rille g a l r e e n tr y , a r g u in gth a t itis u n r e a s o n a b le becau se, he says, iti s great er th an necessary t o achi eve t h e pu rposes of se nt enc i ng. B ec auseS oli s doe s notargue t hatthe se nt enc e r es ul t ed f r om pr oc edur al e r r o r , w e e x a m in e o n lyth e s u b s ta n tiv e re a s o n a b le n e s s o f th e s e n te n c e . S eeG a ll v . Un i t ed S t ate s , 5 5 2 U .S . 3 8 , 1 2 8 S . C t. 5 8 6 , 5 9 6 -9 7 (2 0 0 7 ); Uni t e d St a t e s v. B ran t ley , 537 F . 3d347 , 349 ( 5th C i r. 200 8) . W e give t h e d i st ri ctcou rt ’ s s en t en ce ah i gh de gr ee of d eferen ce b eca u se a sen ten ci n g cou rt i s i n th e b est p ositi on to f i nd fac t s and w ei gh t he 18 U . S. C . § 3553( a) fac t or s i n re l at i on t o apar t i c ul ar d e fe n d a n t. S eeG a ll , 1 2 8 S . C t. a t 5 9 7 -9 8 ; Uni t e d St at e sv . Campo s - Maldo nado , 5 3 1 F .3 d3 3 7 , 3 3 9 (5 th C ir .), cer t . den i ed , 129 S. C t . 3 2 8 ( 2008) . Sol i s di d n ot obj ecti n t h e di st ri ct court t o t h e reasona bl en ess of t h e sentence; t h u s, our revi ew is fo rp la in e r r o r . Uni t e d St at e sv . W hi t e law , ___F. 3d __

__ , N o. 08- 50346, 2009 W L 2 5 1 5 6 7 0 , a t * 2 (5 th C ir . A u g . 1 9 , 2 0 0 9 ); Un i t ed S t ate s v. Pel t i er , 5 05 F. 3d 3 8 9 , 3 9 1 -9 2 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ), cer t . den i ed , 1 2 8 S . C t. 2 9 5 9 (20 0 8 ). T h e di st ri ct court caref u l ly w ei gh ed the § 355 3( a) fact ors an d arti cul ated s u ffic ie n tlyco m p e llin gre a s o n s to ju s tifyth e a b o v e -g u id e lin e s s e n te n c e . S ee Un itedS ta tes v. S m ith , 4 40 F. 3d7 04 , 7 07 ( 5th Ci r . 200 6) . Itc o ns i de r e d a nd di scussed al lof

Soli s’ s argum en t s f

or a w ithi n - gu i del i n es s en t en ce. Th e court determ i n ed, how ever, t h at th ese fact ors w ere outw e igh e d b y t h e needt o deter Sol i s f r om c ont i nui ng t o r ee nt ert he U ni t ed St at es il l egally, es pec i al ly given that th is w a s S o l i s ’ s fo u r th co n v ic tio n fo rille g a l re e n tr ya n dth a t h is e n tir e fa m ily l ive s i n t hi s c o unt r y, m ak i ng r e c i divi s m m o r e li ke ly. Al t ho ughSo l i s m i ght di sagree w i t h t h e w ei gh tt h at th e courtgave t o the rel evan tsentenci n g fact ors, t hi s di s agr e e m e nti s farf r o m s uf f i c i e ntt oes t ab l i s h t hatt he co ur tpl ai nly e r r e d. Cf . id . a t 7 8 (noti n g t h at a non - gu i del i n es s en t en ce i s un reasona bl e w h ere,N o . 0 9 -5 0 0 9 7 c/w N o. 09- 50098

3 a m o n go th e rth in g s , th e d is tr ic t c o u r t c o m m its a“c le a re r r o ro f ju d g m e n t in balanci n g t h e sentenci n g fact ors” ) . Th eref ore, t h e j u dg m en tof t h e di st ri ctcourt i s A F F I RMED.