2022 USDI Bureau of Land Management

National Aviation Plan

and

Oregon / Washington State Supplement

Prepared by: ________________________________________________________ Date: _________

 Amanda Lucas-Rice, BLM OR/WA State Aviation Manager (Acting)

Reviewed by: ________________________________________________________ Date: _________

 Jeff Fedrizzi, BLM OR/WA State Fire Management Officer

 

Approved by: _______________________________________________________ Date: _________

 Barry R. Bushue, BLM OR/WA State Director
U.S. Department of the Interior 

Bureau of Land Management

2022 National Aviation Plan

BLM Fire and Aviation

National Aviation Office
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

1

Table of Contents

1.0 Aviation Plan ......................................................................................................................................... 9

1.1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................................. 9

1.0.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement................................................................................................. 9

1.0.2 District Supplement .............................................................................................................................. 9

1.2 Mission Statement .................................................................................................................................. 9

1.2.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement................................................................................................. 9

1.2.2 District Supplement .............................................................................................................................. 9

1.3 Aviation Program Objectives.................................................................................................................... 9

1.3.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement ................................................................................................. 10

1.4.2 District Supplement..............................................................................................................................10

1.4 National Fire Aircraft Management Strategy...........................................................................................10

1.4.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement...............................................................................................11

1.4.2 District Supplement..............................................................................................................................12

1.5 Authority ...............................................................................................................................................12

1.6 Policy ...................................................................................................................................................12

1.6.1 Handbooks .........................................................................................................................................12

1.6.2 Plans ..................................................................................................................................................12

1.6.3 Guides/Standards ...............................................................................................................................13

1.6.4 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement ................................................................................................. 13

1.6.5 District Supplement..............................................................................................................................13

2.0 Aviation Management Organizations................................................................................................. 14

2.1 Department of the Interior (DOI)............................................................................................................14

2.2 National Aviation Groups/Committees.....................................................................................................14

2.3 Bureau of Land Management (BLM)......................................................................................................16

2.4 National Aviation Office - NAO (FA-500) (reference BLM NAP Appendix 1 for the NAO Staff contact 

information)............................................................................................................................................17

2.4 BLM State/District/Field Office Organizations .........................................................................................22

2.5.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: State/District/Field Office Organizations................................25

2.5.2 District Supplement..............................................................................................................................26

2.5 Aviation Positions ................................................................................................................................. 26

3.0 Administrative Requirements.............................................................................................................29

3.1 General ................................................................................................................................................29

3.2 Reporting and 2021 National Aviation Plan Documentation Requirements ..............................................29

3.2.1 - BLM OR/WA Supplement: Reporting & Documentation requirements................................................29

3.2.2 District Supplement: Local reporting/documentation requirements, roles/responsibilities, etc. ............29

3.3 Aviation Plans: National, State, Unit, and Project...................................................................................29

3.3.1 - BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: State and Unit Aviation Plans................................................30

3.3.2 District Supplement..............................................................................................................................31

3.4 Aircrew Orientation Briefing Package.....................................................................................................31

3.4.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: PNW Aircrew Orientation Guide ..............................................31

3.4.2 District Supplement.............................................................................................................................31

3.5 Land Use Policy for Aviation Activities ...................................................................................................31

3.5.1 BLM OR/WA Supplement: Land Use Policy for Aviation Activities........................................................31
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

2

3.5.2 District Supplement: (List/describe any backcountry airstrips utilized by the agency or the public; the 

status and condition of any airstrips, notification procedures for use, etc. if applicable.).........................32

3.6 Budget..................................................................................................................................................32

3.7 Aircraft Flight Service Ordering ..............................................................................................................33

3.7.1.0 BLM OR/WA Supplement: Aircraft Flight Service Ordering ...............................................................34

3.7.1.1 District Supplement: (Local procedures and points of contact for ordering flight services for non- fire 

resource projects/missions)....................................................................................................................34

3.7.1 Inter-Agency Agreements (IAA) ...........................................................................................................34

3.8 Aircraft Contracts ..................................................................................................................................35

3.8.1.1 BLM OR/WA Supplement: Aircraft Contracts ..................................................................................36

3.8.1.2 District Supplement: (Types of Local Unit EU aircraft contracts and designated ACORs, other 

qualified CORs/PIs, local policies/procedures for contract administration, etc.)......................................36

3.8.1 Non-Fire Exclusive Use Aircraft Contract Process ................................................................................36

3.8.2 Fire Exclusive Use Aircraft Contract Process .......................................................................................36

3.8.3 On-Call/Call When Needed (CWN) Aircraft Contracts...........................................................................37

3.8.4 DOI Aircraft Rental Agreements, Non-Fire – (ARA) ..............................................................................38

3.8.5 Contractor Evaluations........................................................................................................................39

3.8.6 Contractor Fueling-Lower 48 ...............................................................................................................39

3.9 End Product Contracts..........................................................................................................................40

3.9.1.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: End Product Contracts .........................................................40

3.9.1.2 District Supplement: Local Unit procedures and use of End-Product contracts..................................41

3.9.1 End Product Contract Specifications.....................................................................................................41

3.9.2 End Product Project Management........................................................................................................42

3.10 BLM Supplemental Fire Aircraft Acquisition...........................................................................................42

3.11 Cooperator Aircraft ..............................................................................................................................43

3.11.1.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Cooperator Aircraft .............................................................44

3.11.1 Non-Federally Approved Aircraft ........................................................................................................45

3.11.1.2 BLM OR/WA Supplement: Non-federally Approved Aircraft...........................................................45

3.11.1.2 District Supplement: (Identify locally based Cooperator Aircraft and any additional policies on use of 

Cooperator Aircraft, beyond national/state policy.) .................................................................................46

3.12 Senior Executive Service (SES) Flights ................................................................................................46

3.12.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: BLM Senior Executive Service (SES) Flights.......................46

3.13 BLM Law Enforcement Flights..............................................................................................................47

3.13.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: OR/WA LE Appendices.......................................................47

3.14 Search and Rescue (SAR) Flights (see also BLM NAP 3.71.1, 5.6, 5.12 & 5.16)..................................47

3.14 National Guard and United States Military Aircraft Flights .....................................................................47

3.15 Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Flights (see also BLM NAP 5.29) ...................................................48

3.16.1 UAS Flights: BLM UAS Operations may only be performed by the following methods:.......................49

3.16.2 District Supplement: ..........................................................................................................................51

3.17 Dispatching BLM Aircraft - Flight Requests ..........................................................................................51

3.18 Aircraft Use Payment Systems .............................................................................................................53

3.19 Coding for Flight Use Reports..............................................................................................................53

3.20 FEPP ..................................................................................................................................................55

3.21 FBMS..................................................................................................................................................55

3.22 Aviation Program Reviews....................................................................................................................55

3.23 New Program Requests........................................................................................................................55
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

3

4.0 Aviation Safety Management Systems ..............................................................................................56

4.1 General ................................................................................................................................................56

4.2 Safety Management Systems (SMS) .....................................................................................................56

4.2.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: (SMS) .....................................................................................56

4.2.2 District Supplement: (Describe how SMS is implemented on the local unit level.)................................. 56

4.3 Policy ...................................................................................................................................................57

4.3.1 Aviation Life Support Equipment (ALSE)..............................................................................................57

4.3.2 Project Aviation Safety Planning (PASP*) ............................................................................................57

4.3.2.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: PASP/MASP ........................................................................58

4.3.2.2 District Supplement: Local procedures for processing PASP/MASPs .................................................59

4.3.3 Aircraft Accident Investigation Process ................................................................................................59

4.4 Risk Management................................................................................................................................. 60

4.5 Assurance ............................................................................................................................................62

4.5.1.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: SAFECOM ...........................................................................62

4.5.1.2 District Supplement: ..........................................................................................................................62

4.5.1 Aviation Safety and Technical Assistance Team (ASTAT)....................................................................62

4.5.2 Aviation Safety Communiqué - SAFECOM...........................................................................................63

4.5.3 Program Evaluations, Readiness Reviews, Site Visits..........................................................................63

4.5.4 National Fire and Aviation Operations Alert System.............................................................................64

4.5.5 Promotion ..........................................................................................................................................64

4.5.6 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Safety Promotion ..................................................................64

4.5.7 District Supplement: .............................................................................................................................64

4.6.1 Lessons Learned ................................................................................................................................65

4.6.2 Aviation Safety Awards Program..........................................................................................................65

5.0 Aviation Operations ............................................................................................................................66

5.1 General ................................................................................................................................................66

5.1.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: General.................................................................................66

5.1.2 District Supplement: Local Unit Aviation Operations...........................................................................67

5.2 Policy, Operational Guides and Handbooks ...........................................................................................67

5.3 Public/Civil Aircraft Operations ...............................................................................................................67

5.4 BLM Employees on Non-BLM Aircraft....................................................................................................68

5.5 Passengers ..........................................................................................................................................69

5.6 Emergency Exception to Policy:.............................................................................................................70

5.7 Categories of Flight...............................................................................................................................70

5.8 Flight Planning......................................................................................................................................70

5.8.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Flight Planning and Mobilization...............................................71

5.8.2 District Supplement: .............................................................................................................................71

5.9 Flight Following.....................................................................................................................................71

5.9.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Flight Following .......................................................................73

5.10 Radio Frequency Management/Communications....................................................................................73

5.11 Overdue, Missing or Downed Aircraft....................................................................................................73

5.11.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Frequency management/communications .........................73

5.11.2 District Supplement: ..........................................................................................................................73

5.12 Mishap Response................................................................................................................................74

5.12.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Mishap Response ...............................................................74
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

4

5.12.2 District Supplement: (Insert local unit mishap response procedures or consider posting local unit 

mishap response plan in DAP Appendix.) ..............................................................................................74

5.13 Transportation of Hazardous Materials ................................................................................................. 74

5.13.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Transportation of Hazardous Materials...................................74

5.14 Invasive Species Control......................................................................................................................74

5.15 Fire Chemicals, Aerial Application Policy Near Waterways ....................................................................75

5.15.1.1................................................................................................BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement:

75

5.15.1.2 District Supplement ........................................................................................................................75

5.15.1Stormwater Pollution Prevention Planning ..........................................................................................75

5.15.2 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Planning .............................75

5.15.3 District Supplement ...........................................................................................................................75

5.17 Large Airtanker (LAT), and Very Large Airtanker (VLAT) Operations ....................................................76

5.17.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Large Airtanker Operations ....................................................76

5.17.2 District Supplement:.........................................................................................................................76

5.18 Airtanker/SEAT Base Operations..........................................................................................................76

5.19 SEAT Operations ................................................................................................................................77

5.19.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: SEAT Operations...................................................................77

5.19.2 District Supplement: (Describe Local SEAT program and base facilities-primary and reload bases. 

Attach Unit SEAT base operating plan as appendix to Unit Aviation Plan if applicable.).........................78

5.20 Foreign Airtanker Operations................................................................................................................78

5.20.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Foreign Airtankers ................................................................. 78

5.20.1 Water Scooper Operations................................................................................................................78

5.21 Air Attack, ASM and Lead plane Operations.........................................................................................78

5.21.1Aerial Supervision Personnel..............................................................................................................79

5.21.2 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Aerial Supervision..................................................................79

5.21.3 District Supplement: (Insert any applicable information on local Unit use of aerial supervision, 

available resources, and personnel.)......................................................................................................80

5.22 Helicopter Operations..........................................................................................................................80

5.22.1.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Helicopter Operations.........................................................80

5.22.1.2 District Supplement: Local Unit Helicopter use, personnel, equipment, training, etc..........................81

5.22.1Helitack .............................................................................................................................................81

5.22.2Single Skid, Toe In, and Hover Exit/Entry Procedures (STEP)............................................................82

5.22.3Cargo letdown ...................................................................................................................................82

5.22.4Type-1 Helicopter Program.................................................................................................................82

5.23 Aerial Ignition Operations .....................................................................................................................82

5.24 Wild Horse & Burro Operations (WH&B) ..............................................................................................82

5.25 Aerial Capture, Eradication and Tagging of Animals (ACETA)...............................................................82

5.26 Smokejumper Operations .....................................................................................................................82

5.26.1Smokejumper Personnel ...................................................................................................................82

5.27 Light Fixed Wing Operations................................................................................................................83

5.27.1Low-level Flight Operations (Less than 500’ AGL):.............................................................................83

5.27.2Aerial Observer ................................................................................................................................. 83

5.27.3Non-Fire Reconnaissance...................................................................................................................83

5.27.4Single Engine IFR/Night Flight............................................................................................................83

5.27.5Backcountry Airstrip Operations..........................................................................................................83
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

5

5.28 Law Enforcement Operations (LE)........................................................................................................83

5.28.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: PNW Law Enforcement (LE) Operations Reference Appendix

#10 Oregon and Washington Law Enforcement Aviation Operations Supplement...................................84

5.28.2 District Supplement: Local Unit law enforcement aviation personnel and program...............................84

Interagency Fire/Incident UAS Operations: ...................................................................................................84

5.29.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: UAS Operations..................................................................85

5.29.2 District Supplement: ..........................................................................................................................86

5.30 Fleet Aircraft........................................................................................................................................86

5.31 Non-Federally Approved Aircraft...........................................................................................................87

5.32 Snow Operations................................................................................................................................. 87

6.0 Aviation Training................................................................................................................................. 88

6.1 General ................................................................................................................................................88

6.1.1 Fire Training and Qualifications ...........................................................................................................88

6.1.2 Aviation Training for Non-Fire Flight Activities and Positions................................................................. 88

6.2 Management Responsibility ..................................................................................................................89

6.2.1 Supervisory Personnel ........................................................................................................................89

6.2.2 Line Managers....................................................................................................................................89

6.2.3 Aviation Managers at the Local, State and National Level....................................................................90

6.2.3.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: .............................................................................................90

6.2.4 Aviation Contracting Responsibilities COR Training Requirements .......................................................90

6.2.5 Contractor and Cooperator Pilot Training .............................................................................................90

6.2.6 Pinch Hitter Training............................................................................................................................91

6.3 Instructor Standards..............................................................................................................................91

6.4 Development ........................................................................................................................................91

7.0 Airspace Coordination........................................................................................................................92

7.1 Interagency Airspace Coordination.........................................................................................................92

7.2 Flight Planning, Hazards and Obstructions .............................................................................................92

7.3 Fire Traffic Area (FTA) ..........................................................................................................................92

7.4 Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR)........................................................................................................92

7.5 National Firefighting Aircraft Transponder Code (1255)..........................................................................93

7.6 Airspace Boundary Plan ........................................................................................................................93

7.7 Airspace Deconfliction...........................................................................................................................93

7.8 Airspace Conflicts ................................................................................................................................. 94

7.9 Operations Along Foreign Borders.........................................................................................................94

7.10 Airspace Agreements – Memorandums of Understanding .....................................................................94

7.11 Emergency Security Control of Air Traffic (ESCAT)...............................................................................94

8.0 Aviation Security – Facilities/Aircraft................................................................................................. 95

8.1 Aviation Security Policy .........................................................................................................................95

8.2 USFS Facilities Security Assessments ...................................................................................................96

8.3 USFS Security Response Actions..........................................................................................................96

8.4 General Aviation Security Awareness Programs ....................................................................................96

8.5 Cooperators Aircraft Security .................................................................................................................97

8.6 Aircraft Physical Security Requirements ................................................................................................. 97

8.7 Aviation Facility Security Requirements..................................................................................................97

8.8 Exceptions............................................................................................................................................98
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

6

8.9 Transportation Security Administration (TSA).........................................................................................98

9.0 Aviation Facilities................................................................................................................................99

9.1 General ................................................................................................................................................99

9.2 Aviation Facilities (Permanent and Temporary) ......................................................................................99

9.3 Temporary Operations Bases ................................................................................................................99

9.4 Safety...................................................................................................................................................99

9.5 Permanent Facility Construction Planning/Funding and Maintenance .....................................................99

9.6 BLM Owned/Operated Airstrips............................................................................................................100

Appendix Table of Contents.........................................................................................................................101

Appendix 1 - BLM National Aviation Organization Directory....................................................................102

Appendix 2 - SES Flight Scheduling Guide ...............................................................................................103

Appendix 3 - Latitude/ Longitude Information...........................................................................................105

Appendix 4 - BLM SAFECOM Management Roles ....................................................................................107

Appendix 5 - OAS Aviation Program Evaluation Schedule.......................................................................108

Appendix 6 - BLM Cargo Letdown Operations..........................................................................................109

1.1 Purpose..............................................................................................................................................109

1.2 Approval.............................................................................................................................................109

1.3 Cargo Letdown Spotter Eligibility..........................................................................................................110

1.3.1 Cargo Letdown Spotter Initial Training ...............................................................................................110

1.3.2 Cargo Letdown Spotter Refresher Training ........................................................................................110

1.3.3 Cargo Letdown Spotter Proficiency ....................................................................................................111

1.4 Cargo Letdown Check Spotter.............................................................................................................111

1.5 Pilot Experience, Training, and Currency Requirements .......................................................................111

1.6.1 Gloves..............................................................................................................................................112

1.6.2 Spotter Harness................................................................................................................................112

1.6.3 Adjustable Spotter Lanyard................................................................................................................112

1.6.4 Cargo Letdown Spotter Tether Attachment.........................................................................................113

1.6.5 Carabiners and Connectors ...............................................................................................................113

1.6.6 Knife / Knife Sheaths ........................................................................................................................114

1.6.7 Rappel Plate Anchors .......................................................................................................................114

1.6.8 Figure 8 with ears .............................................................................................................................114

1.6.9 Cargo Letdown Line ..........................................................................................................................115

1.6.10Let-Down Containers ........................................................................................................................116

1.6.11External Cargo Deployment (Break-away strap and Cargo Strap) .....................................................117

1.6.12Figure 8 Extender............................................................................................................................117

1.6.13External Cargo Swivel ......................................................................................................................117

1.7 Cargo Letdown Documentation ............................................................................................................117

1.7.1 Cargo Letdown Spotter......................................................................................................................118

1.7.2 Equipment Logs................................................................................................................................118

1.7.3 Spotter Harness................................................................................................................................118

1.7.4 Cargo Letdown Line ..........................................................................................................................118

1.7.5 Rappel Tower Anchor........................................................................................................................118
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

7

1.8 Internal Cargo Deployment Procedures................................................................................................118

1.8.1 Pre-Flight Duties for Cargo Only Missions .........................................................................................118

1.8.2 Equipment Check of Spotter..............................................................................................................118

1.8.3 Rigging and Loading Cargo...............................................................................................................120

1.8.4 Pre-Cargo Delivery Sequence............................................................................................................120

1.8.5 Cargo Deployment Sequence ............................................................................................................121

1.9 External Cargo Deployment Procedures...............................................................................................121

1.9.1 Pre-Flight Duties for Cargo Only Missions .........................................................................................121

1.9.2 Rigging and Loading Cargo...............................................................................................................122

1.9.3 Pre-Cargo Delivery Sequence............................................................................................................122

1.9.4 Cargo Delivery Sequence ..................................................................................................................123

1.10 Cargo Letdown Emergency Procedures..............................................................................................123

1.10.1Cargo Letdown Emergency Procedures: Internal Cargo....................................................................125

1.10.2Cargo Letdown Emergency Procedures: External Cargo...................................................................126

1.11 Cargo Letdown Activities in Support of Extended Attack or Large Fire Operations ..............................129

1.12 Cargo Letdown Training.....................................................................................................................129

BLM Cargo Letdown Trainee Qualification Record...................................................................................131

BLM Cargo Letdown Harness Log.............................................................................................................141

BLM Cargo Letdown Line Log....................................................................................................................142

BLM Cargo Letdown Mission Log..............................................................................................................143

Appendix 7 - BLM Fleet Aircraft Standard Operations Procedures..........................................................144

Appendix 8 – Acting vs Point of Contact...................................................................................................149

Appendix 9 - Acronyms..............................................................................................................................150

1. Oregon and Washington BLM – Law Enforcement Aviation ...........................................................156

1.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................................156

1.2 Purpose..............................................................................................................................................156

2. Organizations....................................................................................................................................157

2.1 Management Positions .......................................................................................................................157

2.2 Aviation Position Definitions.................................................................................................................157

3. Aviation Operations ..........................................................................................................................159

3.2.1 Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) MOU...................................................................................159

3.2.2 Department of Defense (DoD) MOU..................................................................................................159

3.2.3 National Guard (NG) MOU................................................................................................................160

3.3.1 Point-to-Point Flight Following............................................................................................................161

3.3.2 Mission Flight Following ....................................................................................................................161

3.4.1 Small Arms Ammunition....................................................................................................................162

3.5.1 Transport of Injured Officers..............................................................................................................162

3.5.2 Transport of Canines ........................................................................................................................163

3.5.3 Transport of Prisoners ......................................................................................................................163

3.6.1 BLM Contracted Aircraft.....................................................................................................................163

3.6.2 Cooperator Aircraft............................................................................................................................163
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

8

4. Aviation Safety ..................................................................................................................................166

4.1.4.1 ..................................................................................................................................................Helmet

167

4.1.4.2 ......................................................................................................................................Eye Protection

167

4.1.4.3 ..................................................................................................................Personal Protective Clothing

167

4.1.4.4 ..................................................................................................................................................Gloves

167

4.1.4.5 ....................................................................................................................................................Boots

167

4.2.1 PASP/MASP.....................................................................................................................................168

5. Aviation Training...............................................................................................................................170

5.1.1 Supervisor ........................................................................................................................................170

5.1.2 Passenger ........................................................................................................................................170

5.1.3 Aircrew Member/Hazmat....................................................................................................................170

5.1.4 Fixed Wing Flight Manager ...............................................................................................................170

5.1.5 Fixed Wing Flight Manager (Special Use)..........................................................................................171

5.1.6 Helicopter Flight Manager..................................................................................................................171

5.2.1 Helicopter Crewmember ...................................................................................................................171

5.2.2 Helicopter Manager ..........................................................................................................................172

5.3.1 Law Enforcement Short Haul.............................................................................................................172

5.3.2 External Load Operations .................................................................................................................172

Appendix 10: Aviation Memorandums of Understanding and Cooperator Letters of Agreements .......174

Appendix 11: Reference Material ................................................................................................................174
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

9

1.0 Aviation Plan

1.1 Purpose

The purpose of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) National Aviation Plan (NAP) is to describe 

National Aviation Office (NAO) leader’s intent, authority, role and responsibilities, program 

objectives, and to provide strategic and operational guidance to each organizational level. The NAO 

identified the need for a cohesive national aviation management plan that will allow all state, 

district/field offices, and aviation users to easily acquire the necessary information and policy to 

manage the BLM aviation program. Each organizational level plan provides the detailed operational 

procedures pertinent to their organization. This plan is supplemental and does not replace the policy 

as described in the Departmental Manual or the BLM Manual 9400 – Aviation Management.

1.0.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement

The purpose of the BLM Oregon/ Washington (OR/WA) State Aviation Plan (SAP) is to provide the 

nine districts with a uniform set of policies, procedures, guidance, and business practices that 

promote safe, efficient, and economic use of aircraft in support of land management objectives.

This plan is inserted into the BLM NAP as a supplement as a second tier to reduce redundant 

language and provide more specific guidance and direction. Unit Aviation Managers/Unit Aviation 

Officers (UAM/UAO) are encouraged to insert their district/unit or zone aviation plan as a third tier 

into this combined national and SAP. A district/unit level aviation plan developed and maintained as 

a stand-alone document is an acceptable alternative to the three-tiered format. A district/unit level 

aviation plan should describe how national and state aviation policy is implemented at the field level. 

See Section 3.3 for additional details on the required contents.

1.0.2 District Supplement

1.2 Mission Statement

The NAO is responsible for supporting BLM through an active and professional aviation 

organization that:

• Develops and coordinates effective aviation policy and management processes.

• Provides guidance for aviation programmatic and operational risk management.

• Leads aviation safety assurance and promotion programs.

• Provides aircraft acquisition support as specified by BLM management objectives.

• Develops and promotes a skilled aviation management workforce.

1.2.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement

The BLM OR/WA State Office (SO) is aligned with the mission of the NAP stated above. The SO 

provides aviation program leadership to BLM districts in Oregon and Washington with the intent to 

enhance safety, assist the field to develop efficient processes, and encourage cooperation with 

federal and state partner agencies. 

1.2.2 District Supplement

1.3 Aviation Program Objectives

The BLM aviation program provides the aviation tools to meet public expectation for efficient and 

safe management of the National System of Public Lands. Aviation management balances mission
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

10

goals, environmental considerations, available funding, and safety of involved personnel.

Safety: The priority in all BLM aviation missions is the safety of employees, contractors, 

cooperators, and the public.

• Risk management as part of Safety Management Systems (SMS) will be integral in all 

aviation missions and programs.

• Aviation personnel are empowered and expected to manage the risks of aviation 

operations and make reasonable and prudent decisions to accomplish the mission.

• Aviation personnel must take every opportunity to plan missions thoroughly, in respect to 

the aircraft and environment in which they operate.

• Individuals will be held accountable for their decisions, which should be based on policy, 

principles, risk management, training, experience, and the given situation.

• The Bureau is committed to ensuring our workplaces are free of recognized hazards. 

Prior to conducting any mission, all risks will be mitigated to the lowest acceptable level 

possible.

Professionalism: BLM personnel performing aviation functions must be service oriented and 

meet all qualification requirements of the Departmental and Bureau manuals, handbooks, and 

guides.

Diversity: Individual development, employee wellness and workforce diversity will be 

emphasized at all levels of the BLM aviation program.

Innovation: Management at all levels is responsible for enhancing the aviation program with a 

commitment to aviation safety and operational efficiency.

1.3.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement

In addition to the roles and responsibilities identified in the NAP, state and district/unit level 

aviation program managers should strive to achieve the following objectives:

• Provide leadership, direction, service, and support to promote safe, cost-effective 

interagency coordination and cooperation.

• Create a learning environment for aviation personnel and encourage open 

communication with line managers/officers.

• Strive towards zero aircraft incidents/accidents and a reduction in the occurrences of 

mishaps by focusing attention on human factors and the application of sound risk 

management practices.

• Promote effective interagency working relations in a service first organizational structure 

that values mission over agency.

• Maintain and promote aviation currency in accordance with OPM-4.

1.4.2 District Supplement

1.4 National Fire Aircraft Management Strategy

Aviation resources are one of several tools available to accomplish land management objectives. 

The proper utilization of aircraft in support of resource management programs serve as a force 

multiplier when dealing with issues of time, remoteness, terrain, large areas, and distances. Fire 

suppression aviation resources will be mobilized at the earliest opportunity when new starts are 

detected to maximize the effectiveness of initial attack resources.

This national strategy will:

• Optimize overall aviation capability.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

11

• Apply effective management controls to suppression costs.

• Ensure aviation assets are assigned to areas of greatest risk and/or highest probability of 

success.

• Maximize operational flexibility and mobility.

• Contribute to interagency suppression efforts.

The BLM national fire aircraft fleet composition is based in part on the National Interagency Aviation 

Council (NIAC) Aviation Strategy document. Current and out-year appropriations ultimately

influence overall year to year fleet configuration. Any changes in aircraft type or capability must be 

either supported and approved by the Assistant Director of the BLM Fire and Aviation Directorate 

(FA-100) or reflected in this document. Baseline numbers of aircraft, by category, are derived in part 

from either the Interagency Aviation Strategy approved by the Fire Executive Council (FEC) and 

NWCG in 2008 or will be based on the new 2022 BLM Aviation Strategic Plan as adopted. Changes 

to the BLM fire aircraft fleet shall be determined and approved by the Division Chief, Aviation in 

coordination with the Assistant Director of Fire and Aviation. If budget constraints dictate a reduction 

in core aviation assets, these reductions will be absorbed primarily in categories that have the most 

elastic, On Call component and/or that do not impact aerial delivered firefighter capabilities such as 

SEAT’s, Scooper’s, ATGS’s, and Utility Aircraft. When planning tools or strategic plans indicate an 

increase in aircraft numbers, aircraft will be attained through CWN/On-Call procurement and hosted 

in locations that are best suited to logistically support both the aircraft and personnel associated.

To maximize effectiveness and efficiency, aviation resources should be centrally controlled, and 

operations must be locally executed. National strategy considers all BLM fire aircraft and assigns 

personnel to be national resources available for immediate assignment to areas of greatest national 

need, regardless of their status in the National Dispatching System.

The BLM national aircraft management strategy is predicated on the NAO providing oversight to all 

BLM fire aircraft acquisition, coordination, and allocation of aircraft between states. To the extent 

possible, BLM will acquire aircraft that provide the best performance, capacity, speed, technology, 

and safety features that are available and affordable. Government ownership, long- term contracts, 

multiple-aircraft contracts, sharing of contracts and innovative procurement methods will be 

explored to achieve economies whenever possible. The NAO will modify contract terms (designated 

base, MAP, etc.) as required to ensure maximum utilization and effectiveness of firefighting aircraft.

The NAO coordinates with State Fire Management Officers (SFMO) and their staff on aircraft needs, 

availability, and re-positioning.

The NAO facilitates aircraft pre-positioning with funding charge codes. During fire season, BLM 

exclusive use aircraft will be activated and mobilized to meet BLM’s fire needs to the extent 

possible. Once authorized and acquired, all BLM fire exclusive use aircraft, other nationally funded 

aircraft (i.e., On-call/CWN contract task orders) and severity funded aviation resources will be 

considered national resources subject to pre-positioning by SFMOs within their states, and by the 

national office on a national basis. This includes aviation personnel such as single engine airtanker 

(SEAT) managers and Air Tactical Group Supervisors (ATGS). The NAO will coordinate with 

SFMOs and State Aviation Managers (SAM) prior to any aircraft movements.

Supplemental fire aircraft acquisition will be in accordance with BLM NAP 3.10.

Aircraft need and staffing is very dynamic during the wildland fire season. Each aviation facility that 

hosts wildland fire assets should evaluate minimum staffing and maximum aircraft capacity to meet 

aircraft surge. The district/unit aviation plan should provide details identifying aircraft capacity, 

staffing and as a minimum reference appropriate NWCG aviation standards. The plan should 

include proper turn down protocol and be readily available for employees at each identified facility.

1.4.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

12

In the BLM OR/WA, we recognize the national aviation plans and policies regarding aviation assets 

utilized as national resources. The SO highly recommends and encourages district fire and aviation 

managers pre-position aviation resources where needed and share them with neighboring units and

agencies as appropriate via established mobilization procedures. Assignment of exclusive use (EU) 

aircraft outside of the BLM OR/WA for extended attack fire or non-fire projects requires notification 

to the BLM SFMO. The Northwest Coordination Center (NWCC) will in-turn assess current drawdown levels, anticipated resource requirements, and coordinate the movement of aircraft between

agency units accordingly.

1.4.2 District Supplement

1.5 Authority

This plan fulfills the Departmental Manual (DM) requirements outlined in 350 DM 1, Appendix 3, and

BLM Manual 9400.3 Directives. This plan has been developed to provide policy standardization for 

all BLM aviation programs.

1.6 Policy

BLM aviation management and operations will be conducted within policies contained in the Federal 

Aviation Regulations, DOI 350-354 Departmental Manuals, Operational Procedures Memorandums 

(OPM) and Handbooks (HB), and BLM Manual 9400. In addition, the current version of the following 

Handbooks, Plans and Guides constitute BLM Aviation policy as specified in the BLM Manual 9400.

Exemptions/Waivers: Exemptions/waivers to Federal Aviation Regulations and DOI regulations 

must be requested in writing to the BLM Aviation Division Chief. Final approval will reside at the 

OAS Director level (reference 350 DM 1.10). The following are standing waivers that have been 

granted and remain in place as overarching policy will not be changed:

• Waiver for Exemption from 351 DM 1, Aviation Life Support Equipment Handbook, granted 

by BLM Director, Office of Fire and Aviation to BLM State Director, Alaska on 05/23/97. This 

waiver is approved only for Alaska and allows special use mission operations personnel to 

wear rubber boots as necessary.

• Waiver for Exemption from 351 DM 1, Aviation Life Support Equipment Handbook, granted 

by BLM Director, Office of Fire and Aviation on 05/06/98 waiving the requirement for flight 

helmets in all multi-engine airplanes for special use, lead plane and smokejumper 

operations.

• Waiver to 351 DM 1.9B(1) granted by OAS Director to BLM/BIA on 02/14/14. This waiver 

authorizes the applicable SEAT and Fire Boss contracts to specify that flight time will begin 

when the aircraft begins to taxi to the runway with the intent to take off.

1.6.1 Handbooks

• Aerial Capture, Eradication and Tagging of Animals Handbook (ACETA)

• Aviation Life Support Equipment Handbook (ALSE)

• BLM Wild Horse & Burro Aviation Management Handbook (WH&B)

• Law Enforcement Short-Haul Policy

• Military Use Handbook

1.6.2 Plans

• BLM National Aviation Plan

• BLM State Aviation Plans,

• BLM District/Unit Aviation Plans
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

13

1.6.3 Guides/Standards

• NWCG Standards for Aerial Ignition (PMS 501)

• NWCG Standards for Aerial Supervision (PMS 505)

• NWCG Standards for Airspace Coordination (PMS 520)

• NWCG Standards for Airtanker Base Operations (PMS 508)

• NWCG Standards for Helicopter Operations (NSHO PMS 510)

• NWCG Standards for Water Scooping Operations (PMS 518)

• Interagency Smokejumper Pilots Operations Guide (ISPOG)

• Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations (Redbook)

• Interagency Aviation Training Guide (IAT)

• Interagency Standards for Fire Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations (PMS 515)

• NWCG Standards for Aviation Transport of Hazardous Materials (PMS 513)

• NWCG Standards for Aviation Risk Management (PMS 530)

1.6.4 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement

Service first units which have integrated the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and BLM aviation programs

will additionally comply with the USFS 5700 aviation policy and the current USFS National and 

Regional Aviation Safety and Management Plans. The following supplemental guides apply to 

aviation management and operations in OR/WA:

• Pacific Northwest (PNW) Interagency Mobilization Guide,

• PNW Aviation Frequency Guide.

1.6.5 District Supplement
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

14

2.0 Aviation Management Organizations

2.1 Department of the Interior (DOI)

Office of Aviation Services (OAS): The OAS is responsible for Departmental functions related to 

aircraft services. The OAS provides service offerings that include aviation safety services, aviation 

technical services, fleet management, fleet property accountability, aviation user training services, 

and flight scheduling and coordination services (reference 350 DM 1 for a complete list of functions 

and responsibilities). https://www.doi.gov/aviation/

Interior Business Center (IBC) Acquisition Services Directorate (AQD): The Aviation Acquisition 

Services Directorate provides department-wide centralized contracting for aviation flight services for 

DOI and DOI customers. Other acquisition management activities include property accountability and 

small purchase service in support of OAS and Bureau operations including DOI fleet aircraft. 

https://www.doi.gov/aviation/aqd

2.2 National Aviation Groups/Committees

Executive Aviation Board (EAB): The EAB is responsible for the DOI aviation program. The Board 

provides executive oversight and performance accountability and assures that Department-wide 

strategies and initiatives are developed collaboratively and implemented consistently. Additionally, the 

Board provides final review and approval of policy, when needed. The EAB is chartered under the 

direction of the Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget. The EAB has authority over 

all aviation related boards/committees/groups within the Department. The BLM permanent member of 

the EAB is the Bureau Deputy Director.

Executive Aviation Committee (EAC): The EAC is chartered under the direction of the EAB. The 

Committee follows guidance and directives from the EAB and ensures full collaboration among 

members to ensure that EAB and Department objectives are met. The EAC also provides Bureau and 

Department level aviation program performance measurement metrics to the EAB. The EAC is 

responsible for establishing a Bureau Aviation Managers working group to be the primary surrogate of 

the Committee to engage in all DOI aviation related issues at the operational Bureau level. The BLM 

permanent member of the EAC is the Assistant Director, Fire and Aviation.

Executive Aviation Sub-Committee (EAS): The EAS is an advisory group for the EAC. The BLM 

representative to the EAS is the Division Chief, Aviation.

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG): The purpose of NWCG is to coordinate programs 

of the participating wildfire management agencies to avoid wasteful duplication and to provide a 

means of constructively working together. Its goal is to provide more effective execution of each 

agency’s fire management program. The group provides a formalized system to agree upon 

standards of training, equipment, qualifications, and other operational functions. Agreed upon 

policies, standards, and procedures are implemented directly through regular agency channels.

• Membership: NWCG is made up of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 

Forest Service; four DOI agencies: BLM, National Park Service (NPS), Bureau of Indian 

Affairs (BIA), and the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS); the National Association of State 

Foresters and the Intertribal Timber Council. Membership is limited to one individual 

organization representative, except the Forest Service will be represented by two 

representatives – one from fire and aviation management and one from fire research. 

https://www.nwcg.gov/
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

15

National Interagency Aviation Committee (NIAC): The Committee is established to serve as a 

body of resident aviation experts, assisting NWCG with realizing opportunities for enhanced 

safety, effectiveness, and efficiency in aviation related operations, procedures, programs, and 

coordination. NIAC is chartered under the Equipment and Technology Branch of NWCG.

• Membership: Committee membership will reflect a mix of people who are knowledgeable 

in the subject area and who are from NWCG member agencies and organizations, 

including representation from OAS.

https://www.nwcg.gov/committees/national-interagency-aviation-committee

NIAC Sub Committees:

• Interagency Aerial Supervision Subcommittee (IASS)

• ATGS Cadre

• Lead plane Cadre

• ASM Cadre

• Interagency Airspace Subcommittee (IASC)

• Interagency Airtanker Base Operations Subcommittee (IABS)

• Interagency Airtanker Board (IAB)

• Interagency Fire UAS Subcommittee (IFUAS)

• Interagency Aviation Training Subcommittee (IATS)

• Interagency SEAT Board

• Aviation Risk Management Subcommittee (ARMS)

• Smokejumper Aircraft Screening and Evaluation Subcommittee (SASES)

• Interagency Helicopter Screening and Evaluation Subcommittee (IHSES)

• Interagency Aviation Strategic Plan Subcommittee

• Interagency Helicopter Operations Subcommittee (IHOpS)

• Aerial Capture Eradication and Tagging Animals Unit (ACETA)

• Interagency Aerial Ignition Unit

• NWCG Standards for Helicopter Operations

• Interagency Helicopter Rappel Unit

 Rappel Equipment Subunit

• Helicopter Short-Haul Unit

• Interagency Water Scooper Subcommittee (IWSS)

BLM Aviation Management Group (AMG): AMG is chartered under the BLM Fire Leadership 

Team (FLT) to provide BLM leadership and expertise in all areas of aviation management. The 

AMG will promote aviation safety, standardization, and efficiency in support of fire management 

and non-fire activities and provide representation in the development of aviation policy, 

acquisition plans and operational procedures.

• Membership: BLM; NAO program managers, State Aviation Managers, Liaison from Fire 

Operations (FA-300) and FLT.

BLM Air Attack Committee: The BLM Air Attack Committee is formed under the authority of the 

AMG with the concurrence of the BLM FLT to provide national leadership in all areas of BLM air 

attack operations. Promote and coordinate safe, effective, and efficient fire operations to accomplish 

Bureau of Land Management (BLM) fire management objectives. This will be done in collaboration 

with the AMG in coordination with the BLM National Air Attack Program Manager.

• Membership: The AMG designee (Co-Chair), The BLM National Air Attack Program 

Manager, one liaison from the Fire Operations Group (FOG), one voting representative
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

16

each from those states with exclusive use air attack aircraft (ID, CO, MT, NV, OR, UT, 

AK).

BLM Airbase Committee: The Airbase Committee (ABC) is formed under the authority of the 

AMG with the concurrence of the BLM Fire Leadership Team (FLT). The Airbase Committees 

mission is to provide BLM leadership expertise in all areas of air base facilities and operations. 

Promote aviation safety, standardization, and efficiency in air base operations. Recommend 

opportunities for improvement in review and standardization of air base facilities. This will be 

done in collaboration with the AMG.

Membership:

• AMG representative (Co-Chair)

• One voting member from states with permanent BLM fixed wing air bases; AK, AZ, CA, 

CO, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR/WA, UT, WY.

• NIFC Ramp Representative

• Fire Chemicals Program Lead (FA-500)

BLM Helitack Committee: Chartered under the Fire Operations Group (FOG): The Helitack 

Committees mission is to provide national leadership in all areas of BLM Helitack operations. 

Promote and coordinate safe, effective, and efficient fire operations to accomplish Bureau of 

Land Management (BLM) fire management objectives. This will be done in collaboration with

and under the direction of the BLM Fire Operations Group in coordination with the BLM National 

Helicopter Program Manager and AMG.

2.3 Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

BLM Director: The Director is responsible for the aviation management program. This 

responsibility is exercised through the Assistant Director for Fire and Aviation (FA-100).

Assistant Director, Fire and Aviation (FA-100): This position is responsible for aviation policy 

and program oversight. This responsibility is delegated and accomplished through the Division 

Chief, Aviation (FA-500).
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

17

2.4 National Aviation Office - NAO (FA-500) (reference BLM NAP Appendix 1 for the NAO Staff contact 

information)

Division Chief, Aviation (FA-500): This position serves as principal aviation advisor to the 

Assistant Director for the BLM Fire and Aviation Directorate (FA-100), and other staff, BLM state 

offices, and Departmental aviation programs. This position supervises the Deputy Division Chief, 

Staff Assistant and Aviation Safety & Training Advisor.

• Identifies and develops Bureau aviation policies and procedures, as well as standardized 

technical specifications for aviation missions for incorporation into the directives system. 

• Coordinates aviation-related activities and services between the Washington Office (WO), 

and states with other wildland firefighting, regulatory, investigative, and military agencies.

• Represents the BLM at interagency meetings, on interagency committees developing 

government-wide aviation policies, requirements, procedures, and reports, at aviation 

industry meetings and conventions.

• Plans and conducts technical and managerial analyses relating to the identification of 

aviation organization and resources appropriate for agency use, cost-effectiveness of 

aviation, other specialized missions, aircraft acquisition requirements, equipment 

developmental needs, and related areas.

• Provides oversight of aircraft acquisition and fleet management, contract administration, 

aviation operations, aviation safety, security and risk management, reviews, and 

evaluations of state aviation programs.

Deputy Division Chief, Aviation: This position serves as the Deputy to the Division Chief and 

has responsibility for direction of all phases of the Aviation Division’s program of work. This 

position supervises and provides program guidance and technical direction to the Flight
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

18

Operations Manager, Helicopter Program Manager, SEAT Program Manager, SEAT 

Coordinator, UAS Program Manager, and Ramp Services Supervisor.

• Develops the BLM National Aviation Plan.

• Prioritizes and coordinates national allocation/reallocation of BLM fire aircraft.

• Manages the BLM NAO Operations, Labor, and fire exclusive use contract budgets.

• Coordinates contracting and cooperator aircraft requests with AQD/OAS.

• Reviews states aircraft severity and preposition funding requests; coordinates with BLM 

Fire Operations.

• Serves as the standing Co-Chair of the AMG Committee.

• Serves as the aviation liaison to the Fire Operations Group.

Flight Operations Manager: This position provides oversight and supervision for the Aerial 

Supervision Module (ASM) and Smokejumper programs and standardization of all BLM flight 

operations.

• Serves on the Interagency Aerial Supervision Subcommittee (IASS) and lead plane cadre.

• May function as a qualified pilot.

• Develops guidance for BLM aircraft and pilot standards.

• Develops and coordinates ASM and Smokejumper operational procedures, training, and 

certification.

• Provides guidance on light and medium fixed-wing aircraft operations and standards.

• Primary point of contact for management of BLM Fleet (WCF) aircraft.

• Assigns BLM representative on the Smokejumper Aircraft Screening Equipment and 

Evaluation Subcommittee (SASES) and Interagency Smokejumper Pilots Operation 

Guide Steering Committee.

• Coordinates primary relief for the Fleet Smokejumper aircraft.

• Supervisor for the Air Attack Program Manager, Pilots and Development Pilots located 

within FA-500.

Aviation Safety & Training Advisor: This position provides leadership and technical expertise 

for aviation safety management systems, risk management and accident prevention programs. 

Has oversight of aviation training for BLM, providing training/certification guidance (curriculum, 

course materials, and instruction) for BLM fire and resource management aviation personnel.

• Serves as the BLM investigation team member and/or liaison to National Transportation 

Safety Board (NTSB) and OAS accident investigation teams.

• Oversees the BLM SAFECOM System and Management Roles.

• Compiles BLM aviation safety statistics and analysis.

• Serves on accident review boards.

• Develops and/or coordinates aviation training in support of BLM aviation programs.

• Serves as a member of the Interagency Aviation Training Subcommittee (IATS).

• Serves as a member of the Interagency Aviation Risk Management Subcommittee 

(ARMS)

• Coordinates the development of web-based training for both vendor and government 

communities.

• Manages Aviation Leadership Development Initiative (ALDI) supported by the NAO.

• Primary point of contact for OAS Aviation Program Evaluations.

Helicopter Program Manager: This position provides oversight of the BLM helicopter program.

• Reviews requests for exclusive use contracted helicopters, and coordinates with AQD, 

OAS and State Aviation Managers.

• Develops and establishes agency helicopter operational standards.

• Develops helicopter position requirements and training.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

19

• Conducts site visits, reviews, and inspections.

• Serves as a member of the Interagency Helicopter Operations Subcommittee (IHOpS), 

Interagency Helicopter Screening and Evaluation Subcommittee (IHSES) and BLM 

Helitack Committee.

• Coordinates movement of BLM EU helicopters from AK to L-48 and L-48 to AK.

• NAO point of contact for End Product Contracts that potentially have an aviation 

component.

Single Engine Airtanker (SEAT) Program Manager: This position provides oversight and 

guidance to the SEAT and Scooper programs.

• Develops and coordinates requirements and training for the SEAT program.

• Assists in development and review of contract specifications for National SEAT and Fire 

Boss On-call contracts.

• Performs site visits and inspections of SEAT operating bases.

• Develops contract specifications in coordination with both AQD and industry 

representatives.

• Chair of the Interagency SEAT Board.

• Serves as BLM representative to the Interagency Airtanker Board.

• Develops the SEAT Operations Section of the NWCG Standards for Airtanker Base 

Operations.

• Coordinates with the BLM State Aviation Managers on SEAT contract activation and 

allocation of aircraft.

• Functions as national liaison with State SEAT programs.

• BLM advisor to the Interagency Airtanker Base Subcommittee (IABS).

• BLM national lead for fire chemicals development and implementation. Maintains and 

updates fire chemicals policy, plans and direction. National COR for fire chemical 

contracts, BPAs, and EERAs. Wildland Fire Chemicals Systems interagency technical 

contact and DOI liaison. DOI (except BIA) representative on the Fire Chemicals 

Subcommittee. Organizes and conducts national level training in fire chemical application 

and use.

SEAT Coordinator (SECO): This position is responsible for coordinating the allocation and 

reallocation of SEATs nationwide, management and oversight of the BLM fire chemical program 

and is the primary focal point for BLM airbase standardization.

• Advises the NMAC and the NICC of the status, location, and utilization of Federal and 

State contracted SEATs throughout the nation.

• Makes best value determinations when hiring aircraft to meet field requirements.

• Primary subject matter expert on fire retardants/suppressants and responsible for 

overseeing the Bureau fire chemicals program.

• Provides leadership for the use of fire chemicals by developing and implementing 

procedures to assure safe, environmentally appropriate, and effective retardant and 

suppressant operations.

• Functions as the Bureau representative on the Interagency Fire Chemical Board.

• Works in coordination with the US Forest Service as the BLM’s Contract Officer 

Representative (COR) on the long-term retardant contract.

• Provides technical expertise and assistance to BLM fire and aviation management for 

development of policy, guidance and direction regarding the establishment, management, 

and utilization of airbases.

• Coordinates with subject matter experts in the fields of environmental compliance, airfield 

design and aviation experts to assess current conditions of Bureau airbases to establish 

a baseline understanding of the scope and nature of existing issues.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

20

• Establishes standards that ensure Bureau airbase compliance with all Federal and State 

requirements while creating and implementing best management practices.

• Serves as the National Office representative to the BLM Airbase Subcommittee

UAS Program Manager: This position provides national guidance and standardization for BLM 

UAS programs.

• Serves as the national point of contact for BLM UAS Program.

• Identifies and develops program need, growth, and capacity commensurate with 

evolution of UAS.

Communicates, coordinates, and collaborates with aviation leadership on UAS initiatives, 

standards, and performance expectations.

• Provides programmatic strategy and oversight to the development of UAS 

projects/missions.

• Coordinates the BLM national UAS training programs in conjunction with interagency 

partners.

• Provides BLM input to the NWCG Standards for Fire Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Operations (PMS 515).

• Serves as a member of the Interagency Fire Unmanned Aircraft Systems Subcommittee.

UAS Fleet Manager

• Coordinates the acquisition of agency owned/operated UAS in conjunction with SAMs 

and OAS/AQD.

• Evaluates, develops, and reviews exclusive use and on-call UAS contract specifications; 

coordinates with AQD, OAS and State Aviation Managers.

• Maintains an inventory of BLM owned UAS.

• Manages systems and payloads including maintenance, warranty, and repair.

UAS Specialist: This position supports the UAS Program Manager in the implementation of the 

BLM UAS program.

• Supports Bureau programs in the planning and execution of incident and resource 

UAS projects; reviews and approves project plans which require UAS.

• Observes and monitors field applications of UAS to ensure compliance with Bureau 

policy. This will require field assignments to wildland fire suppression or resource 

management activities.

• Conducts fire UAS operations as a UAS Pilot (UASP), UAS Module Leader (UASL) or 

UAS Manager (UASM).

• Conducts non-fire UAS projects as required.

• Completes missions/projects safely, effectively, and efficiently in accordance with 

mission/project goals and objectives.

• Develops Project Aviation Safety plans (PASP) to support national, state, and local UAS 

projects/missions. These plans are developed and implemented in accordance with DOI 

and BLM policy.

• Develops and evaluates sensor and data collection/processing equipment/techniques.

• Develops UAS training curriculum to support Bureau aviation programs.

• Coordinates and leads the presentation of UAS training programs in accordance with 

FAA, DOI, and BLM policy.

• Maintains a roster of qualified BLM UAS personnel.

• Develops and leads reporting, data collection, geospatial program.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

21

• Coordinates with AQD, OAS and State Aviation Managers.

Air Attack Program Manager: This position provides national guidance and standardization for 

the BLM Air Attack program.

• Develops and reviews exclusive use and on-call Air Attack contracts specifications, 

coordinates with AQD, OAS and State Aviation Managers.

• Coordinates the BLM national ATGS training program (S-378, CRM, and associated flight 

training) in conjunction with interagency partners.

• Develops, coordinates, and implements strategic and tactical utilization of air attack 

aircraft, and associated personnel in conjunction with State Aviation Managers, 

Geographic Area Coordination groups, and interagency partners.

• Provides BLM direction for the NWCG Standards for Aerial Supervision and relevant 

policy/operations documents.

• Coordinates with Geographic Area Coordinating groups regarding the activities of the 

ATGS Cadre and the BLM Air Attack Committee.

• Serves as a qualified ASM/ATGS Instructor/Final Evaluator and coordinates staffing for 

the BLM national ATGS training platform.

• Serves as a member of the Interagency Aerial Supervision Subcommittee (IASS).

• Maintains a list of qualified BLM ATGS Instructors, and ATGS Final Evaluator personnel.

Air Tactical Supervisors (AITS): These positions serve as Air Tactical Supervisors on Aerial 

Supervision Modules.

• Develop and review ASM procedures, make recommendations to the Aerial Supervision 

Program Manager.

• Instruct NWCG S-378 ATGS and AITS courses and mentor trainee ATGS and AITS 

personnel.

• Serve as subject matter experts (SME) for aerial supervision, airspace coordination, 

SEAT and airtanker operations.

Air Tactical Pilots (ATP): These positions serve as ASM and/or Lead plane (LPIL) pilots.

• Serve as a contract project inspector for the BLM contracted ASM planes.

• Serve as an SME for aerial supervision, airspace coordination, SEAT and airtanker 

operations.

• Develop and review ASM/Lead plane procedures, make recommendations.

• Provides aircraft and mission training for tactical resources as assigned.

Smokejumper Pilots: These positions serve as smokejumper pilots.

• Serve as an SME for smokejumper pilot operations, smokejumper operations and back 

country airstrip operations.

• Develop and review smokejumper pilot procedures and make recommendations.

• Provides aircraft and mission training for tactical resources as assigned.

Aviation Staff Assistant: This position provides a full range of administrative support to the 

national aviation staff.

• Prepares and approves travel authorizations and vouchers, processes payroll, monitors 

budget reports and credit card statements to ensure expenditures are correctly made.

• Works with the Financial and Business Management System (FBMS) to create purchase 

requisitions for interagency agreements, contracts, and requisitions.

• Prepares all formal office correspondence, including memorandums, Instruction 

Memorandums, and Information Bulletins.

• Coordinates meetings and conferences for local and national-level events.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

22

Ramp Services Supervisor (FA-510): This position oversees and directs aircraft ramp 

operations providing ground aviation management and ground support services to based and 

transient aircraft, air crews, transient personnel, and cargo on the NIFC Aircraft Ramp.

• Ensures compliance with FAA, OSHA, EPA, BLM, OAS and airport aviation and security 

regulations.

• Develops the NIFC Ramp Services Operation Plan

• Manages interagency flight helmet repair service through the NFES for participating 

agencies and cooperators.

Assistant Aviation Management Specialist/Pilot: This position is developmental and provides 

the incumbent with the skills and background to compete for vacancies at the State and National 

levels, GS-12 and above. This position works under the guidance of national program managers 

as assigned but is supervised by the Flight Operations Manager.

• Provides assistance to program managers within the National Aviation Office.

• Serves as a Developmental Pilot functioning as a Pilot Trainee and Pilot-In-Command of 

single and multi-engine reciprocating and turbine powered airplanes under visual and 

instrument flight rules.

2.4 BLM State/District/Field Office Organizations

State Directors, District/Field Manager: Aviation responsibilities are outlined in 350 DM 1 Appendix 4.

• State Directors are responsible for all aviation activities within their respective jurisdiction.

• Each state will assign a State Aviation Manager (SAM). The SAM position provides 

oversight of the state aviation program and support to the state/district/field offices on all 

aviation matters.

• District/Field Managers are responsible for all aviation activities within their respective 

jurisdictions.

• Each District/Field Manager will assign a Unit Aviation Manager (UAM) to provide 

oversight and staff assistance on all aviation matters.

• District/Field Managers are responsible for review and approval of Project Aviation Safety 

Plans, when required, for aviation activities within their respective jurisdictions.

State Fire Management Officer (SFMO): The SFMO is responsible for providing oversight and 

approval of the acquisition and use of BLM fire aircraft within their state.

• Provides state strategic direction and guidance.

• Has the authority to prioritize the allocation, reallocation, pre-positioning and movement 

of all fire aircraft assigned to the BLM within their state.

• Coordinates with Districts/Units, Geographical Area Coordination Centers (GACC), and 

NAO to maximize the utilization of Exclusive Use aircraft assigned to their state.

• Ensure all state assigned aerial resources are managed to maximize initial attack 

effectiveness.

State Aviation Manager (SAM): The SAM serves as the principal aviation professional for the 

State Director and is responsible for providing aviation program management, oversight, and 

support to district/field office aviation operations within the state. The SAM has functional 

responsibility in the following areas and should have a delegation of authority for each area of 

responsibility:

• Develops and implements the state aviation management plan and establishes aircraft 

safety and accident prevention measures.

• Reviews all Project Aviation Safety Plans (PASP) with a Final Risk Rating of “High” prior 

to implementation.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

23

• Serves as the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) on all BLM aviation exclusive 

use contracts assigned to the state.

• Nominates candidates to the Contracting Officer for potential appointment as Alternate 

CORs (ACOR) and assigns Project Inspectors (PI) for all BLM exclusive use aviation 

contracts in their state.

• Authorized to order aircraft and ensures all aircraft ordering and dispatching occurs via a 

dispatch office.

• Provides aviation training support to the state office, field/district offices, and other 

cooperative agencies.

• Provides statewide statistical analysis and A-126 reporting.

• Coordinates with the NAO specialists regarding aviation issues.

• Coordinates with other interagency partners on regional and state levels.

• Is a member of a geographic area(s) coordinating group aviation committee.

• Establishes an “Aviation Point of Contact” or designates an acting SAM when needed. 

Ensures that acting SAM meet all training requirements and any state requirement for 

delegation (reference BLM NAP Appendix 8).

• Reviews all potential End Product contracts that could conceivably utilize aircraft 

(reference BLM NAP 3.9).

• Collects annual BLM aviation statistics for the state to include all fire and resource flight 

hours and associated costs. Desired delivery to the NAO by November 1st annually. 

https://www.nifc.gov/about-us/our-partners/blm/aviation/administration

• Reference the NWCG Standards for Airspace Coordination (Chapter 2, Roles and 

Responsibilities) for specific airspace coordination responsibilities.

• Reviews request for UAS projects to ensure agency compliance.

Zone/District Fire Management Officer (FMO): This position is responsible for hosting, staffing, 

supporting, providing daily management, and dispatching all BLM fire aircraft assigned to their 

unit.

• Authorized, through a line officer delegation, to request additional fire aircraft; establish 

priorities; and allocate all fire aircraft assigned to the BLM within their unit or zone.

• Ensure that all BLM Exclusive Use aircraft and affected Airbases assigned to their unit 

are staffed for seven-day coverage throughout the contract period barring adverse 

weather conditions and callback provisions.

• Ensure status of all BLM fire aircraft (On-Call and Exclusive Use) assigned to their unit is 

reported each day to the GACC as either “Committed” or “Available”. Aircraft will not be

designated as available “local only”.

• When directed by the state office, will mobilize BLM fire aircraft, and assigned

personnel as requested.

• Ensure BLM fire aircraft and aircrews are ready for assignments off-unit.

• Ensure that when dispatched off-unit, assigned aircraft managers and aircrew will 

accompany the aircraft to provide appropriate staffing.

• Delegates or performs the function of the UAM when this position is not assigned.

Unit Aviation Manager (UAM): Field offices (district/center/zones) must designate a UAM, 

either full time or collateral duty, to provide program oversight at the local level. Some units may 

utilize Service First or similar agreements with interagency partners to fulfill the UAM duties (Unit 

Aviation Officer (UAO) or Forest Aviation Officer (FAO)). The UAM is the principal local aviation 

professional and is responsible for managing and supporting the aviation program for the unit.

The UAM has functional responsibility in the following areas and should have a delegation of 

authority for each area of responsibility:
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

24

• Ensures district/unit flight compliance with DOI/BLM/state and district policies and 

regulations.

• Confirms that a qualified flight manager is assigned to all flights as required.

• Ensures that visiting aircrews, pilots and incident management teams receive a Unit 

aviation briefing.

• Develops and implements the District/Unit aviation management plan (Interagency 

aviation management plans if applicable), as well as specific operating plans for other 

aviation programs (helitack, SEAT, airbase, and air tactical).

• Ensure the unit aviation plan identifies aviation base(s) maximum aircraft capacity and 

minimum staffing levels to operate safely and efficiently. Shall also include turn down 

protocol.

• May serve as the ACOR or PI on BLM exclusive use aircraft.

• Interagency Aviation Manager may also function as a COR for USFS contracts.

• Authorized to order approved aircraft utilizing agency procurement documents and 

processes. See NAP 3.8.3 for DOI On-Call and USFS Type 1 and Type 2 helicopter 

CWN and NAP 3.8.4 for DOI Aircraft Rental Agreement.

• Assists in development, review and briefing the appropriate level of signatory authority for 

PASPs per BLM NAP 4.3.2

• Ensures that the local dispatch center’s airspace coordination procedures, with the 

military airspace schedulers, are current and that coordination with military airspace 

schedulers is completed for all flights.

• Identifies unit flight hazards and coordinates the creation and annual updating of flight hazard 

map products (reference Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations, 

Chapter 16, NSHO Chapter 3).

• Reviews unit SAFECOM reports and facilitates corrective actions.

• Ensure units’ Aviation Mishap Response Guide and Checklist is updated in accordance 

with NAP 5.12, and functional.

• Facilitates, tracks unit aviation training, and coordinates with unit training manager and 

SAM.

• Conducts reviews and inspections of aviation facilities, aircrews, and field operations.

• Coordinates arrangements for land use agreements/leases of aviation operations 

facilities.

• Ensures Aviation Security Plan is current and implemented.

• Collects and compiles aviation activity statistics and makes reports. 

https://www.nifc.gov/about-us/our-partners/blm/aviation/administration

• Coordinates with SAM on all Senior Executive Service (SES) flights and use of 

cooperator aircraft.

• Coordinates with SAM on any aircraft flight service contracting needs.

• Designates an acting UAM when needed. Ensures that acting UAM meets all training 

requirements (reference BLM NAP Appendix 8).

• Coordinates with SAM on all potential End Product contracts that could conceivably 

utilize aircraft.

• Reference the NWCG Standards for Airspace Coordination (Chapter 2, Roles and 

Responsibilities) for specific responsibilities.

• Reviews request for UAS projects to ensure agency compliance.

• If a Storm Water Prevention Pollution Plan (SWPPP) is in place at their facilities, UAMs 

will ensure that the SWPPP is current and being followed by BLM personnel.

• Ensures that procedures are in place so that in the event of an aviation mishap or 

accident involving aircraft, UAM/SAM is notified in a timely manner.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

25

First Line Supervisors of BLM Pilots: Duties for this position are outlined in 350 DM 1 Appendix 3.

Duties include:

• Maintain aviation supervisory currency in accordance with OPM-4.

• Ensure employee pilots meet training requirements set forth by the Bureau as well as 

those outlined by 351 DM 3 and OPM-22.

• Ensure employee pilots maintain personal documentation of required training.

• Maintain an employee pilot training file.

• Pilot training records documentation will be submitted to the Alaska SAM for BLM Alaska 

pilots and to the BLM NAO for all other BLM employee pilots by May 15 annually.

BLM Pilot – Fleet (2101, 2181 position series) & Incidental/Dual Function: The pilot is in 

command of the aircraft and has ultimate responsibility, under both Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) and DOI policy, for the safety of the aircraft and personnel onboard. Other 

responsibilities include the following:

• Duties outlined in 350 DM 1 Appendix 3.

• Meet training requirements set forth by the BLM as well as those outlined by 351 DM 3

and OPM-22.

• Maintain personal documentation of required training.

• Submit training records documentation to immediate supervisor by May 1 annually.

• Comply with all requirements of 351 DM 3 and any other applicable policy, including pilot 

qualification carding for authorized missions.

• Incidental/Dual Function pilots must have a letter of authorization issued by the BLM state 

office in coordination with the NAO. The letter describes the pilots’ duties and restrictions 

to include any special use requirements (reference 351 DM 3.2C).

• Operates the aircraft in accordance with applicable federal aviation regulations (FAR) and 

DOI/BLM guides, policy, and procedures, and within aircraft contract specifications.

• Develops, activates, and closes FAA or agency flight plans.

• Wears and uses personal protective equipment as required (reference Aviation Life

Support Equipment Handbook (ALSE) and applicable operations Handbooks).

• Conducts mission planning, performs a thorough pre-flight inspection of the aircraft,

and briefs all passengers in accordance with 351 DM 1.5.

• Does not deviate from flight plan or mission profiles unless agency authorization is 

received or as directed by air traffic control.

• Completes all flight records (OAS-AURM or AMD-23), completes OAS procedures as 

authorized.

• Works with OAS maintenance and helps to arrange for aircraft maintenance as needed.

2.5.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: State/District/Field Office Organizations

The BLM OR/WA State Director has overall responsibility for the BLM OR/WA aviation program

which is delegated to the BLM OR/WA SFMO. The SFMO delegates the daily duties and

responsibilities of managing the aviation program to the BLM OR/WA SAM. There is delegated

written authority to act in the absence of the SAM when needed and vice versa.

State Aviation Manager: The following duties are supplemental to the list found in the BLM NAP:

• Maintains currency as an Intermediate-level Interagency Aviation Trainer (IAT) per the standards in 

OPM-4. The current SAM serves as a designated evaluator for IAT instructor trainees on behalf of 

the training division of OAS and the BLM National Aviation Safety and Training Program Manager.

• Functions as BLM representative on the Pacific Northwest Wildfire Coordinating Group (PNWCG) 

Aviation Committee along with aviation managers from four other federal agencies and two State 

agencies. The Pacific Northwest Coordination Group Aviation Working Committee (PNWCG-AWTC) 

provides interagency management, coordination, and oversight for fire-related aviation programs 

and aviation safety.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

26

• Serves as the point of contact for aviation policy and planning, training, Airspace Coordination, and 

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) policy.

• Participates as the SO representative on the PNW Interagency UAO Working Group (UAOWG).

UAM/Unit Aviation Officer (UAO):

This position is commonly referred to as an UAO instead of UAM here in the PNW region. Each 

BLM district in OR/WA has identified and designated UAM or UAO who is responsible for the 

oversight of all aviation activities conducted under BLM operational control on his/her respective 

district/unit(s). The specific authority and responsibilities of each UAM/UAO is specified in a 

letter of delegation signed by the district manager. In the case for interagency service first UAO 

a delegation from BLM District Manager and USFS Forest Supervisor to manage an 

interagency aviation program.

Each district/unit is required to have a specific aviation management plan, and have it updated, 

reviewed, and approved annually. Unit aviation plans should be submitted to the SAM for review 

by May 1st each year to be finalized/signed by a line officer, i.e., district manager by June 1st 

each year. The list of required contents for a district/unit aviation plan is found in Section 3.3 

below.

On those districts that host BLM EU aircraft contract(s) (currently Burns, Vale, and Lakeview),

the UAM/UAO serves as and has been delegated the responsibility to function as the 

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), with written authorization by a DOI-AQD 

Contracting Officer.

The UAM/UAO on each district is responsible for reviewing all Project Aviation Safety 

Plans/Mission Aviation Safety Plans (PASP/MASP) and any end-product contract solicitations 

that may potentially utilize aircraft prior to being opened for bids. The SAM shall then review the 

PASP/MASP or any contract solicitation before it is approved. See Sections 3.8 and 3.9 below 

for more information on contract administration responsibilities. See Section 5.1 Operations, for 

a more detailed description of the district aviation programs in OR/WA.

2.5.2 District Supplement

2.5 Aviation Positions

Aircrew Members: Personnel (not pilot/passenger) that are required to be on board the aircraft 

to perform an active mission function during a flight to ensure the successful outcome of the 

mission. For public aircraft operations, an aircrew member is also defined as a “qualified noncrewmember” (see definition for qualified non-crewmember below). For position equivalency 

Reference OPM-04 One-Way NWCG Position to IAT Training Position Crosswalk. Aircrew 

Members include, but are not limited to:

• Designated observers - Spotters

• Personnel conducting surveys or mapping

• Photo/video operators

• Loadmasters and flight attendants
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

27

Aircraft Dispatcher: Dispatch personnel trained in aviation mission operations, policies, and 

procedures who receive process and place orders for aircraft, provide flight following and other 

aviation support services. Duties include:

• Confirms that a BLM Flight Request 9400-1a (or equivalent) is utilized, and completed for 

BLM operationally controlled non-fire flights (point-to-point and mission flights).

• Provides flight following and coordinates with other agencies on flight following when air 

operations cross jurisdictional boundaries.

• Maintains a current Aviation Mishap Response Guide and Checklist and initiates 

emergency search-and-rescue procedures for overdue, missing, or downed aircraft.

Required to test the plan at least annually through a simulation exercise. (See also BLM

NAP 5.12)

• Follows the procedures established in the Geographic and National Mobilization Guides.

• Utilizes required boundary plan checklist (reference NWCG Standards for Airspace

Coordination Chapter 7) when dispatching any aircraft into identified dispatch boundary 

zones.

• Provides appropriate notification to assist in airspace coordination and de-confliction and 

meet any applicable airspace coordination agreements that BLM has with military 

airspace scheduling authorities (FAA, bordering dispatches, and military).

• Authorized to order and/or hire approved aircraft utilizing DOI AQD aircraft contract 

sources for non-fire and fire flights. Cooperator aircraft (USFS, state, and National Guard) 

can be ordered per fire master agreements and Unit Aviation Plan.

• Reference the NWCG Standards for Airspace Coordination (Chapter 2, Roles and 

Responsibilities) for specific responsibilities.

Airspace Coordinator (ASCO): An Airspace Coordinator may be ordered to assist or assume 

airspace coordination duties. The Airspace Coordinator may be located at a GACC, local unit, 

Area Command, or State Office. Individual must have extensive experience coordinating 

airspace issues. Duties could include airspace deconfliction, Temporary Flight Restriction, 

coordination with DoD and FAA, activating airspace agreements, Pilot briefings and conflict 

resolution. For additional information, consult Chapter 2 “Agency Organizations, Roles and 

Responsibilities and Airspace Committees” of the NWCG Standards for Airspace Coordination.

An “Agency Specific” Position Task book has been created for ASCO. The Task book is posted

at: http://www.nwcg.gov/publications/agency-taskbooks

Aircraft Manager: Aircraft managers supervise tactical aircraft operations. Each manager 

complies with appropriate Interagency Operations Guide, Redbook and is responsible for the 

following:

• Plans, coordinates, and supervises aircraft operations according to DOI/BLM policy.

• Directs pilots and crews, and provides operational and safety briefings to aircrews, 

project leaders, and passengers.

• Conducts and completes flight time reports, daily diaries, and all related documentation.

• Conducts mission planning and risk/hazard analysis with the pilot.

Flight Manager: A flight manager will be designated for point-to-point flights transporting 

personnel. The flight manager is a government employee (which may be the pilot) that is 

responsible for coordinating, managing, and supervising flight operations. The flight manager is not 

required to be on board for most flights, however for complex multi segment flights a flight manager 

is recommended to attend the entire flight. The flight manager will meet the qualification standard 

for the level of mission assigned as set forth in the Interagency Aviation Training (IAT) Guide.

• Reference National Interagency Mobilization Guide Chapter 20 for specific 

responsibilities.

• Non-fire Special Use fixed wing missions (as defined by OPM-29) require oversight by a 

Fixed Wing Flight Manager-Special Use.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

28

A helicopter flight manager is utilized to supervise missions limited to point-to-point transport of 

personnel from one helibase/airport to another helibase/airport, low- and high-level 

reconnaissance, and landings or takeoffs at unimproved sites; the helicopter flight managerresource is not expected to fulfill all the duties of a qualified non-fire helicopter manager. Rather, 

he/she is the government representative who coordinates with the pilot regarding the safety and 

efficiency of the flight.

Helicopter Manager – Resource: Responsible for coordinating, scheduling, managing, and 

supervising non-fire resource helicopter operations. Training Requirements involve the 

completion of the task book and meeting the training requirements in OPM-04.

Fire Helicopter Manager: A Single Resource Boss (HMGB) is responsible for supervising and 

directing a fire suppression module. Training Requirements HMGB.

Vendor Pilot: All vendor pilots must conform to the procurement document requirements they 

are operating under.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

29

3.0 Administrative Requirements

3.1 General

This section establishes: definitions, management responsibilities, policies, and procedures for 

administration of the aviation program in BLM.

New program requests involving aerial assets, not already approved by established Bureau or 

Departmental policy, must be routed through the State Director to the Division Chief Aviation for 

approval. (See NAP 3.23)

3.2 Reporting and 2021 National Aviation Plan Documentation Requirements

General administration policy for BLM Aviation is found in 350 DM 1.

• The approval and documentation of Senior Executive travel in agency and agency procured 

aircraft is as required by OMB Circular A-126. States shall forward biannual reports (April and 

October) to the NAO, who will forward to OAS.

• Documentation requirements for aviation activities shall follow requirements in

BLM Manual 1220 Records and Information Management Appendix 2, Combined Records 

Schedules, Schedule 10/8 and 9.

• Each office will maintain an aviation reference library and aviation files (these may be paper

copies and/or electronic documents) per BLM Preparedness Review Checklist #10 “Aviation 

Management” located at: BLM Preparedness Review Checklists

• Documents must be retained for at least three years. The designated aviation manager at the 

unit, state and national levels must be responsible for maintaining and updating all aviation 

related references, files, and records.

3.2.1 - BLM OR/WA Supplement: Reporting & Documentation requirements

The UAOs will submit flight use and cost summary data to the SAM at the end of each fiscal year so that an 

end-of- year summary report can be compiled and submitted to the NAO. A template spreadsheet is 

distributed to each BLM OR/WA UAO by early summer each year to utilize for submitting data for the annual

report. Separate reports will be submitted to the NAO by the SAM to report Cooperator Aircraft use, SES flight 

hours, or other flight use as requested. During PNW preparedness levels 4 and 5, interim use statistics and 

UAO participation on daily aviation conference calls may be requested by the SAM to assist with Geographic 

Multi-Agency Coordination (MAC) resource allocation.

3.2.2 District Supplement: Local reporting/documentation requirements, roles/responsibilities, etc.

3.3 Aviation Plans: National, State, Unit, and Project

BLM Manual 9400, Aviation Management specifies national aviation management policy. The 

national, state and district/field offices aviation plans describe procedures that implement policy 

direction in the 9400 manual. State and unit plans supplement national policies and procedures. 

State and field offices must not implement policy or procedures less restrictive than national policy. 

If a state or unit plan must contain more restrictive procedure, a written request, prior to 

implementation, is to be sent to the NAO.

National Aviation Plan (NAP): The BLM NAP provides comprehensive information regarding BLM 

aviation organization, responsibilities, administrative procedures, and policy. The BLM NAP is 

intended to serve as an umbrella document that state aviation plans can follow for formatting and 

describe procedures applicable to the organizational level. The BLM NAP will be updated and 

issued annually prior to March 1 by the NAO. The NAP is approved by the Assistant Director of the 

BLM Fire and Aviation Directorate (FA-100).
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

30

NIFC Ramp Services Operation Plan: The Ramp Services Operation Plan defines the mission, 

provides checklists, orientation outlines and instruction for employees and contractors and 

standardizes operating procedures at NIFC Ramp Services.

State Aviation Plans: Each state must publish an aviation plan that implements national policy and 

describes protocols specific to each state’s aviation program. The State Aviation Plan serves as an 

umbrella document for Unit Aviation Plans. However, the State Aviation Plan may also be designed 

to serve as an overall Unit Aviation Plan provided that the local unit administrative and operational 

procedures are incorporated along with the aircraft supplemental plans that are

specific to each unit aviation program (see identified procedures listed under Unit Aviation 

Plans). State Aviation Plans are approved by the State Director. State Aviation Plans shall be 

updated annually and submitted to the NAO for inclusion to the BLM Aviation web site: 

https://www.nifc.gov/about-us/our-partners/blm/aviation/library

Unit Aviation Plans: Units (districts/field offices/zones) are required to maintain and update Unit 

Aviation Plans annually, which implement national and state policy and establish local procedures 

and protocol. Unit Aviation Plans are approved by the District/Field Office Manager. Unit Aviation 

Plans must address local administrative and operational procedures to include:

• Unit/state organizations

• Aviation facilities

• Radio use

• Repeater locations

• Phone and computer use

• Airspace coordination to include boundary zone deconfliction (reference 

NWCG Standards for Airspace Coordination Chapter 7) 

• Flight hazards

• Aircraft ordering

• Dispatching and flight following procedures

• Administrative procedures

• Identification of typical aviation missions

• Risk assessment and mitigation specific to the Unit or not addressed in State/National 

Aviation Plan (reference BLM NAP 4.4)

• Unit Aviation Plan, Supplemental Operational Plans or Project Aviation Safety Plans must 

address recurring aircraft operations. Examples include:

o Airbase operations

o Helitack operations

o Smokejumper operations

o Airtanker operations

o Aerial Supervision.

o Light Fixed Wing (Fire Detection and Recon, Logistical, etc.).

o WH&B

o ACETA

o Law Enforcement operations

o Non-Fire Aviation Activities

Project Aviation Safety Plans (PASP): A PASP will be developed and approved at appropriate 

levels depending on project/flight complexity and risk as required for specific non-fire 

flights/projects (reference BLM NAP 4.3.2 for specific PASP requirements).

3.3.1 - BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: State and Unit Aviation Plans
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

31

As suggested in the BLM NAP, Sec. 3.3 above, the BLM OR/WA is inserting the SAP as a supplement 

or second tier to the NAP. BLM districts are encouraged, but not required, to adopt this format and

include their unit aviation plan as a third tier into the appropriate sections of this document. A standalone aviation plan document is equally acceptable. Regardless of which format is utilized, the 

following two requirements must be met: district/unit aviation plans must contain all the required 

elements specified in this section of the BLM NAP above, and in DOI-OPM-6. Unit Aviation Plans 

should be reviewed by the SAM and signed then approved by the unit line officer by June 1st each 

year. The valid duration of a unit aviation plan is one year from the date it was signed by the line officer 

at which time it must be replaced with an updated signed/approved plan. A thirty-day extension is 

available upon request and approval of the SAM. A district/unit aviation plan or program may not 

implement a policy or procedure that is less restrictive than State and NAP direction.

It should be noted that the PNW uses the new term MASP in place of or interchangeable with PASP as

an interagency standard. You will see the two terms used and mean the same thing.

3.3.2 District Supplement

3.4 Aircrew Orientation Briefing Package

Each state and unit will create an Aircrew/Pilot Orientation Briefing Package. Ultimately, the format of 

this package will be standardized throughout the states. Unit Aviation Managers are responsible for 

providing visiting pilots, aircrews, and Incident Management Teams with a briefing. The orientation 

briefing package serves as a source of information about local administrative and operational 

procedures (copy of the unit aviation plan, frequency sheets, repeater locations, flight following 

procedures, hazard map, known landing zones, recommended lodging/dining list, maps, etc.).

3.4.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: PNW Aircrew Orientation Guide

The PNW IUAOWG has an established the PNW Aviation Orientation Guide which is updated as 

needed and shall be incorporated in each individual unit’s supplement.

3.4.2 District Supplement

3.5 Land Use Policy for Aviation Activities

The regulation of aviation activities on or above BLM managed lands is typically dependent on 

resource management plan (RMP) direction, wilderness management regulations and any 

applicable federal aviation regulations.

Temporary aviation operations on BLM lands may be restricted due to RMP direction. UAMs should 

coordinate with resource managers to identify areas of restriction when developing district/field 

office operating plans, Unit Aviation Plan, and PASP. For information regarding implementing 

invasive species control measures for aviation activities reference BLM NAP 5.14. For information 

regarding aerial application of fire chemicals, refer to Chapter 12 of the Red Book, additionally, the 

local resource advisor is the focal point for coordinating the reporting of any fire chemical aerial 

application in or near waterways.

3.5.1 BLM OR/WA Supplement: Land Use Policy for Aviation Activities

Aviation operations supporting fire incidents or non-fire projects on the BLM lands may require 

coordination with agency resource advisors. Private lands and certain airports owned/managed by 

the Oregon State Division of Aviation are sometimes temporarily used by agency or interagency fire
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

32

suppression aircraft. This incidental use of non-federal land will normally require an emergency land 

use agreement that defines the authorized use and method of reimbursement by the government. 

Procedures for reporting the inadvertent or intentional application of fire chemicals within 300 feet of 

waterways are listed in Chapter 12 of the Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations 

(Red Book). Additional local procedures and points of contact may be described in more detail in the 

Unit Aviation Plan.

There is increasing interest and differing internal viewpoints regarding public recreational use of 

airstrips that are located on BLM lands which may or may not be depicted on aeronautical sectional 

charts. The following language is found in the BLM Policy Manual MS 1626.pdf. This updated BLM 

Manual 1626 – Travel and Transportation Manual (Public), Release 1-1731, dated 9/27/2016. The 

specific guidance includes but not limited to:

6.7 Water and Air Travel RMPs should address access across BLM-managed lands to federal and 

state-owned waters and for aircraft landings on land and water. Recreational backcountry airstrips 

can be an integral part of a balanced and efficient transportation system. Backcountry airstrip 

designations need to be consistent with the goals and objectives for the planning area and applicable 

Federal Aviation Administration regulations

6.10 Recreational Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) “Drones”. The term "unmanned aircraft" means 

a device that is used or intended to be used for flight in the air without the possibility of direct 

intervention from within or on the device, and the associated operational elements and components 

that are required for the pilot or system operator in command to operate or control the device (such 

as cameras, sensors, communication links). This term includes all types of devices that meet this 

definition (e.g., model airplanes, quadcopters, drones) that are used for any purpose, including for 

recreation or commerce. The Federal Aviation Administration provides regulation and guidance 

governing the use of Unmanned Aerial Systems, however as a motorized vehicle, an unmanned

aircraft is governed by the OHV regulations while they are on or immediately over the ground. Other 

regulations, such as closures and restrictions (43 CFR 8364) may be required to manage this activity 

more comprehensively.

80. 43 CFR 4740 – Protection, Management, and Control of Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros | 

Motor Vehicles and Aircraft.

3.5.2 District Supplement: (List/describe any backcountry airstrips utilized by the agency or the public;

the status and condition of any airstrips, notification procedures for use, etc. if applicable.)

3.6 Budget

BLM Fire exclusive use contract fire aircraft daily availability is budgeted by the NAO (FA-500). All 

exclusive use availability guarantees and fixed government ownership costs for fire aircraft are held at 

the NAO.

Non-Fire exclusive use contract and fleet aircraft are budgeted outside the NAO through a variety of 

sources.

3.6.1 BLM OR/WA Supplement: Budget

The budget for the BLM OR/WA is tracked by the SO by both SO Budget Officer and BLM SFMO. 

Preparedness funds are allocated to the districts with SFMO concurrence. Severity requests are

prepared by the BLM representative to the national Fire Operations Group (FOG) with assistance 

from others in the SO fire operations, as well as the SAM.

District Supplement:
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

33

3.7 Aircraft Flight Service Ordering

Only flights with a scheduled air carrier on a seat fare basis and with payment utilizing their federal 

government credit card are initiated by individual BLM employees. Aircraft acquisition and 

procurement for all other flights are approved to be arranged only by IBC (AQD), (Exceptions - 353 

DM 1.2.A & OPM-15). These flights are scheduled, managed, and arranged by qualified aviation and 

dispatch personnel in their respective BLM offices (see also BLM NAP 3.17.1) and approved at the 

appropriate management level (reference state and unit aviation plans).

Aviation services under DOI contract or rental agreement are paid through the IBC. Contractors are 

responsible for final submission for payment, through the processes defined by IBC. Assigned 

Flight/Aircraft Managers are responsible for input/review and signature of the AMD-23E. COTRs and 

CORs are designated by the CO to monitor aviation services contract performance and technical 

provisions of the contract.

When ordering aircraft, no modification of contract requirements is authorized, except by the CO.

Ratification of Unauthorized Commitments: Unauthorized commitments (orders with vendors 

without a current and valid DOI ARA or On-Call contract, or commitments on contracts that are 

not funded by a task order) could be subject to the ratification procedures set forth in the Federal 

Acquisition Regulation 48 CFR 1.602-3 (reference 353 DM 1.8).

On-Call contracts and ARAs have specific ordering procedures. The procedures are found on the 

OAS web site: https://www.doi.gov/aviation/aqd/contracts

An ordering official is a person who places an order directly with a Contractor. They must have the 

knowledge to conduct and document a cost comparison/ Contractor selection rationale. For

BLM, the only personnel that have Bureau authorization to order aircraft are qualified aircraft 

dispatchers, UAMs and SAMs.

Orders for service shall be placed with the Contractor who is determined to represent the best value 

to the Government, using tradeoff analysis. In selecting an aircraft, the ordering official must evaluate 

Contractors by trading-off the differences in capability and price. If one Contractor has both the better 

capability and the overall lower price, then that Contractor will be the best value. If one Contractor has 

the better capability and the higher price, the ordering official will decide whether the difference in 

capability is worth the difference in price. If the ordering official considers the better capability to be 

worth the higher price, then the more capable, higher priced Contractor will represent the ultimate 

best value to the Government.

When selecting a Contractor with the better capability but a higher price, the ordering official must 

provide a short explanation to support this decision on the cost comparison.

Criteria evaluated are:

• Aircraft or contractor capability.

• Price (flight time, guarantees, mobilization, per diem, service truck mileage)

• Availability of the contractor to meet time frames.

Once the selection is made, it is the Bureau personnel’s responsibility to ensure the aircraft and 

pilot offered by the vendor are approved for the mission.

Procedures for placing orders against the DOI On-Call/ARA for all “Non-Fire” and “NonEmergency” aircraft services: The ordering unit shall complete a DOI Flight Services Request
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

34

Form (AQD-91) for all flights and submit the completed form to: aqd91@ibc.doi.gov

If utilizing the ARA and your estimate exceeds $150,000.00, contact your OAS Flight Coordination 

Center or the Contracting Officer.

The ordering official shall document the vendor price analysis on the second tab of the Flight 

Services Request Form (AQD-91). Selection of three sources within the local area to compare best 

value criteria will meet this competition requirement. When selecting a Vendor with the better 

capability but a higher price, the ordering official shall place a short explanation to support this 

decision on the AQD-91. (Reference BLM NAP 3.2 for documentation retention)

3.7.1.0 BLM OR/WA Supplement: Aircraft Flight Service Ordering

The UAOs, center managers, and qualified aircraft dispatchers (or others as designated by the 

Center Manager or UAO in a local dispatch mobilization plan) are authorized to arrange for the use

of rental and on-call (CWN) contract aircraft for administrative, logistical, or tactical mission flights. 

The UAM will ensure that an aircraft with the appropriate performance capability for the mission is 

selected using acceptable evaluation criteria and processes.

The NAP and the acquisition section of the OAS website describe the requirement to complete a Best 

Value Determination form prior to hiring an aircraft using one of the DOI on-call flight services 

contracts or the Aircraft Rental Agreement. The documentation requirements may vary depending on 

which contract will be used to procure an aircraft to perform a mission. The appropriate instructions, 

forms, and documents are found on the OAS website. When in doubt about the process, UAOs 

should call the appropriate AQD Contracting Officer to receive specific guidance. Districts are 

responsible for developing the IAA and obligating the funds for specific missions. Cross servicing is 

another option for local units to efficiently procure flight services through AQD and the Contracting 

staff at a district or state office level. See NAP Sec. 3.7.2 above for more details.

Use of a BLM EU contract fire aircraft, for either fire or non-fire projects, is already covered by an IAA 

established at the national level. Fire aircraft may become unavailable on short notice or be 

unexpectedly diverted from a resource project to perform initial attack.

Several example references documents, including IAAs, AQD-91, and documents needed to create a 

purchase requisition (Statement of Work, “Determination and Findings,” etc.), are available from the 

SAM to assist field units with ordering flight services for non-fire projects. Districts are cautioned about 

exceeding the amount authorized in any IAA obligation that will result in ratification. If that occurs, a 

second IAA will be needed to obligate additional funds. Estimate high when you obligate and refer to 

the latest SO instruction memorandum for specific details about ratifications of unauthorized 

commitments.

3.7.1.1 District Supplement: (Local procedures and points of contact for ordering flight services for nonfire resource projects/missions)

3.7.1 Inter-Agency Agreements (IAA)

DOI AQD Contract/ARA aviation services procured by BLM can be funded via an Interagency 

Agreement with AQD. This will require a substantial amount of lead time for non-fire aviation 

services to ensure the agreements for funding are in place before any flight activity takes place. 

The Ordering Official of the aircraft must ensure that an Interagency Agreement (IAA) has been 

completed by their agency and accepted by DOI prior to placing an order against the contract. That 

document will identify the amount, purpose, period of performance and source of the funding.

DOI AQD Contract/ARA Aviation Services Acquired in Support of Non-Fire Activities:

Aviation users must work with local UAM to assure non-fire aviation services are ordered in
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

35

accordance with State/District protocols to include:

• Identifying the need for a non-fire flight.

• Completing an AQD-91 Flight Services Request Form / Best Value Comparison to 

identify a particular aircraft and associated cost.

• Completing a PR request with appropriate funding from benefiting activity.

• Creating a new IAA or modifying an existing IAA as needed and referencing the existing 

IAA on the AQD-91.

BLM Exclusive Use contract aircraft can perform BLM non-fire project work without the need to 

create an AQD-91 specific to that aircraft and mission. If no AQD-91 exists, the Aircraft Manager 

would just include the appropriate charge code for the BLM non-fire costs on their normal 

payment document and the benefiting activity will be expensed. If an AQD-91 has already been 

created and the Unit wishes to utilize those dollars already obligated on the AQD-91 then the 

Aircraft Manager will need to submit a separate payment document specific to just that project 

that references the Task Order created for the AQD-91. If this process does not occur, the unit 

could in effect be double billed if the Unit does not de-obligate the AQD-91 prior to year-end fiscal 

blackout.

DOI Contract/ARA Aircraft Services Acquired in Support of Fire Management Activities: 

The Department has provided direction to create miscellaneous obligations for inter-agency 

agreements with AQD. These obligation numbers will be disseminated by the National Aviation 

Office each fiscal year after the agreements for fire exclusive use availability and BLM fire 

management activities are executed.

• A National IAA is established for BLM fire management activities (suppression, severity, 

prescribed fuels, emergency stabilization, burned area rehabilitation, preparedness, and 

any other federal emergency response).

• A separate National IAA is established for BLM fire exclusive use aircraft availability and 

BLM NAO Fleet aircraft (N190PE, N49SJ, N618, N162GC, and N700FW) monthly rate.

3.7.2 Cross Servicing with AQD for Contract/ARA Aviation Services Acquired in Support 

of Non-Fire Activities: Cross Servicing functionality in the Financial and Business Management 

System (FBMS) affords Bureaus 100% financial transparency of funding from requisition to award 

by eliminating the need for Interagency Agreements as well as the burden of managing the IntraGovernmental Payment and Collections (IPAC's). The functionality allows requesting Bureaus to 

create requisitions in their business area of the Systems, Applications, and Products data 

processing software (SAP) that flow directly to AQD's area of Procurement Information System for 

Management (PRISM) for award. When awards are released in PRISM the obligation flows 

directly to the requesting Bureaus business area of SAP. Aviation users must work with local UAM 

to assure non-Fire aviation services are ordered in accordance with State/District protocols to 

include:

• Identifying the need for a non-fire flight.

• Completing an AQD-91 Flight Services Request Form / Best Value Comparison to 

identify a particular aircraft and associated cost.

• Create a PR with the appropriate funding from benefiting activity.

o The PR must be completed in accordance with the cross-servicing instructions 

provided by AQD.

• Document the PR number in the block provided on the AQD-91.

3.8 Aircraft Contracts
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

36

Aircraft flight services in excess of $150,000 require an Exclusive Use aircraft contract or the use 

of: DOI On-Call or USFS Call When Needed (CWN) contract to include competitive task orders 

when deemed appropriate. Short term projects (< $ 150,000) may utilize the DOI Aircraft Rental 

Agreement (ARA) or the On-Call contract.

The DOI On-Call and USFS CWN contracts are competitive bid contracts that do not have a 

$150,000 limit like the ARA.

3.8.1.1 BLM OR/WA Supplement: Aircraft Contracts

The BLM UAM in Burns/Vale Districts and UAO on the Lakeview District serve as the COR on 

their respective BLM EU fire helicopter contracts and the air tactical fixed wing contract in Ontario, 

OR. The daily duties of administering these contracts are often delegated to the aircraft manager 

(helicopter crew supervisor, air attack group supervisor, etc.) who may be formally designated as 

the “Alternate COR” (ACOR) by a DOI-AQD contracting officer (if trained and certified as a Level

2 COR), or as a project inspector via letter of delegation from the COR. A description of these 

contract aircraft is found in Chapter 5, Operations.

• When an existing EU contract expires (all option-years have passed), or if a new contract 

is needed in the BLM OR/WA, the SAM will submit a new AQD-13 to the BLM NAO.

• The NAO will verify that adequate funds are available in the current year FA-500

allocation to support the contract daily availability, and an AQD-16 will be issued to 

confirm funding.

• The UAM/UAO will consult with his/her unit FMO to determine the start date for each 

year’s EU contract period and then notify the SAM. The SAM will coordinate with and 

notify the SO Operations section and NAO.

• The COR will submit an AQD-19 “Notice to Proceed” to the Contractor and the DOI-AQD 

Contracting Officer (with a courtesy copy sent to the SAM and NAO) at least four weeks

in advance of the desired start date. Once the AQD-19 is acknowledged by the contractor, 

the start date can be varied by up to 14 days before or after the projected start date, as 

stated in the contract and in Sec. 3.8.2 of the NAP above.

• Contract extensions will be authorized per the NAP procedures in Sec. 3.8.2 above.

3.8.1.2 District Supplement: (Types of Local Unit EU aircraft contracts and designated ACORs, other 

qualified CORs/PIs, local policies/procedures for contract administration, etc.)

3.8.1 Non-Fire Exclusive Use Aircraft Contract Process

• State, field, and district offices are required to submit a “Request for Contract Services” 

Form (AQD-13) to the SAM for all potential or desired contracted flight services. The SAM 

will review and approve/disapprove all AQD-13’s. The SAM will work with the appropriate 

AQD Contracting Officer (CO) and NAO personnel to provide coordination, technical 

input, solicitation review, and decision making for each contract award.

• A “Pre-Validation of Funds for Contract Award/Renewal” Form (AQD-16) will be 

authorized by an appropriate budget officer prior to awarding or renewing non-fire 

aircraft contracts.

• The SAM will provide the NAO program manager with a copy of any AQD-13, AQD-16,

“Notice to Proceed” (AQD-19), Request for Amendment/Modification and/or Request for 

Contract Extension for any Non-Fire Exclusive Use aviation contract at the same time the 

original request is forwarded to the AQD CO.

3.8.2 Fire Exclusive Use Aircraft Contract Process

• Any changes in aircraft type or capability that would significantly increase fixed costs 

must be supported and approved by the Assistant Director of the BLM Fire and Aviation 

Directorate (FA-100).

• The appropriate NAO program manager completes Form AQD-13 in coordination with the
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

37

SAM for approval of all requested exclusive use aircraft. The NAO program manager will 

review all AQD-13’s and work with the appropriate contracting officer in providing 

coordination, technical input, solicitation review, and decision making for each contract 

award.

• SAM will provide the NAO program manager with a copy of any AQD-19 and/or Request 

for Amendment/Modification for any Exclusive Use aviation contract at the same time the 

original request is forwarded to the AQD CO.

• All AQD-16’s will be authorized by the NAO prior to awarding, renewing, or extending fire 

aircraft contracts.

Changing the Contract Start Date: The aircraft start dates can be changed to accommodate 

the government work or training schedules. If the start date is altered from that shown on the 

original AQD-16, the COR will notify the Deputy Division Chief, Aviation (FA-500). The start date 

of the exclusive use period may be adjusted up to 14 days prior to, or 14 days after the normal 

start date (as stated in the aircraft contract). The start date is established by a Notice to Proceed 

Form (AQD-19) issued by the COR. Adjusting the start date does not alter the length of the use 

period.

Funding through the following code: LLFA540000 LF1000000.HT0000 begins on the new start 

date and is available continuously for the total number of exclusive use days (excluding contract 

extension) specified in the contract.

Contract Extension: Mutual Extension - The exclusive use period may be extended on a dayby-day basis after the Mandatory Availability Period (MAP), provided that such extension is 

agreeable to both parties in writing prior to the extension. An extension on the use period creates 

use “outside” of the normal exclusive use period and requires early planning, coordination, and a 

contract modification by the CO. It also requires a dedicated funding source approved by the 

NAO. Extensions are not guaranteed; they require written mutual agreement (contract 

modification). They are normally used when additional work is anticipated, and other funding

sources are available. Funding for extensions may be through BLM (i.e., suppression, severity, 

rehab, non-fire, etc.) or from another agency which requires a reimbursable agreement to be in 

place.

• Funding from LLFA540000 LF1000000.HT0000 is limited to the number of days specified 

in the contract and is not to be utilized during contract extension.

• Use Rates for Pay Item Codes (FT, SM, PD, EP, ET, SC, etc.) - All Use Rates will be 

charged to the appropriate office and benefiting activity, but not to the NAO code.

• SAM will make a request for any Exclusive Use contract extension a minimum of two 

weeks prior to end of exclusive use period to the Deputy Division Chief, Aviation.

• Contract extension on Severity Funding must be requested by the State and approved by 

the National Office through the standard severity request process.

3.8.3 On-Call/Call When Needed (CWN) Aircraft Contracts

AQD administers the DOI On-Call aircraft contracts and the USFS administers the Type 1 and 

Type 2 Helicopter CWN contract. Authorized BLM personnel (check procurement on who is 

authorized to order) can hire aircraft using these contracts through the Interagency Resource 

Ordering Capability (IROC) as described in the contracts and the National/Geographic Area 

Mobilization Guides. Funding for these aircraft is made through specific incident emergency fire 

suppression, approved severity funding, or approved non-fire activity funding. The emergency

fire suppression funding is only available until the specific incident is controlled/out. Resource 

ordering procedures are described in the Geographic Mobilization Guide. The types of DOI OnCall and USFS CWN aircraft contracts available to BLM are:

DOI On-Call Contracts: Reference AQD web site for contract details and ordering procedures:
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

38

https://www.doi.gov/aviation/aqd

There are separate contracts for:

• Small helicopters (ICS Type 3) – 4 to 6 seat helicopters.

• Used for Fire Operations and Resource Management Projects.

• DOI On-Call C27.2.2 NON-FIRE and ONE-DAY FIRE missions can be hired on a 

daily availability and fixed flight rate basis or a project flight rate basis. Orders 

placed and accepted on the basis of payment for daily availability and the fixed 

flight rate will be subject to contract clause C27.

• Reference DOI On-Call C26.2.1“.......... requires a government representative to

submit an AQD-91 Flight Request Form with a government estimate to include 

three contractors......”

• SEAT – Fire suppression.

• Air Tactical Fixed Wing – Fire Suppression or Non-fire missions.

• On Call Wild Horse & Burro and ACETA – Inventory/Census, Herding, 

Marking/Eradication/High Velocity Darting, Net-Gunning/Low Velocity Darting, Wild Horse 

and Burro (WH&B) herding and capture. Census and classification may be accomplished 

under the DOI On-Call Small Helicopter Contract.

• UAS

• Fire: Reconnaissance, mapping, and situational awareness.

• Non-Fire: Resource management projects.

USFS CWN Aircraft Contracts: Reference USFS web site for contract details and ordering 

procedures: http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/contracting/helicopters_cwn/helicopters_cwn.htm

There are separate contracts for:

• USFS National Type 1 and 2 Helicopter CWN contract - Medium to heavy lift helicopters. 

Project flight rates apply for non-fire projects.

• USFS Regional Type 3 Helicopter CWN contracts – Light, multi-purpose helicopters.

• USFS Exclusive Use and CWN contracted aircraft are available for DOI use per 

requirements of OPM-39.

3.8.4 DOI Aircraft Rental Agreements, Non-Fire – (ARA)

ARA for helicopters in the L-48 has been combined with the DOI On-Call Small Helicopter 

contract. The ARA must NOT be utilized to obtain direct fire suppression aircraft and tactical fire 

support aircraft. Non-tactical operations that an ARA aircraft may be used to include fire 

monitoring, fire detection, personnel, or cargo transportation (non-Initial attack), etc. The ARA is 

used to procure flight services requested under a blanket purchase agreement (BPA) and are 

acquired under the authority of Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), Part 13, and BPA. These 

are not competitive contracts, thus have limitations of $150,000 total expenditure per ordered 

project. Project requirements of more than $150,000 must not be separated into several 

transactions to avoid expenditure limits. The OAS Regional Offices administer the ARA program 

through the Flight Coordination Centers. The AQD web site has a link to the Aircraft and Pilot 

Source List: https://www.doi.gov/aviation/aqd/aviation_resources

Resources are in a database that is searchable by: vendor, type of aircraft, special use 

qualification. Helicopters are ordered, depending on project needs, from the DOI On-Call 

contracts: Small Helicopter, or the ACETA. The airplanes available on the ARA Source List

typically do not have the same level of avionics that On-Call contracted planes have. Most ARA 

aircraft have a minimum flight hour daily guarantee.

The numbers of approved rental aircraft must be consistent with program objectives. Requests 

from the field to add new vendors must be carefully reviewed at the state and national level. All
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

39

“Request for Rental Services” (AQD-20) will be reviewed and submitted by the SAM to the NAO. 

The appropriate NAO program manager (fixed wing, helicopter) will review the request and, if 

approved, forward to the OAS for processing. Some criteria for assessing need for additional 

rental aircraft are:

• Type of aircraft.

• The number of same type of aircraft available locally to the field offices.

• The estimated annual usage of that type of aircraft.

• Special services/equipment provided by the contractor.

3.8.5 Contractor Evaluations

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation 42.1502, past performance evaluations shall 

be prepared at least annually and at the time the work under a contract or order is completed. 

The AQD-136A Form Evaluation Report on Contractor Performance (Exclusive Use, On-Call, 

CWN and ARA) is used for documenting contractor performance for aviation services performed 

in support of DOI customers.

The CO will register each contract by submitting the contract information to the agency’s CPARs 

office. For both exclusive use and on-call contracts, the Project Inspector (PI)/Flight Manager is 

responsible for completing the contractor evaluation form. The evaluations for the exclusive use 

contracts will be forwarded to the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) for review and entry 

into the CPARs system.

On-Call includes Small Helicopters, Air Attack, SEAT, UAS and ACETA. The on-call contract 

evaluations shall be forwarded to the SAM. The SAM will review and forward the on-call 

evaluations to the respective Contracting Officer for entry into CPARs.

National Call When Needed (CWN) USFS Type1 and Type 2 helicopter contract. The 

PI/Helicopter Manager shall complete the USFS Contractor Performance Assessment Report 

and submit to the USFS CWN Contracting Officer with a courtesy copy to the SAM.

The CO will review and submit the evaluation to the Contractor for their review and signature. 

The contractor has 30 days to either accept the rating or provide comments. After agreement of 

both parties, the evaluation becomes an official past performance record which may be used in 

future source selections.

The PI / Flight Manager should discuss the evaluation with the contractor’s representative before 

submission. If during the performance of a contract there are negative performance issues, the 

PI should attempt to resolve issues with the contractor’s representative and inform the UAM and 

COR of issues. If any issues cannot be resolved locally, then the COR will facilitate contacting 

the contractor and/or the CO.

3.8.6 Contractor Fueling-Lower 48

DOI / BLM aviation contracts in the lower 48 states require the aircraft contractor to provide fuel 

for government contracted aviation operations regardless of the location. SEAT and helicopter 

contracts require the vendor to have a fuel truck in addition to the aircraft. Aircraft contractors are 

obligated to provide fuel for their own contracted aircraft and the fuel support vehicles. The

aircraft contractors have the discretion to purchase aircraft fuel from commercial sources on

site/airport or provide their own fuel for the contracted aircraft. FAA specifically addresses what 

aircraft owners and associate businesses are permitted to do specific to fueling operations.

The FAA’s Airport Compliance Manual - Order 5190.6B 11.2. Restrictions on Selfservicing Aircraft. Grant Assurance 22(f), Economic Nondiscrimination, clearly indicates 

that an aircraft owner or operator may perform their own self-fueling activities, including 

bringing fuel to the airport with its own employees in conformance with the airports rules 

and regulations pertaining to self-service operations.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

40

BLM personnel will not direct the contractor on where or how to acquire aviation fuel. Local 

aviation managers should be familiar with their local airport authority’s rules governing selffueling and any fuel flowage fees that apply to BLM operations. Local Aircrew Orientation 

Briefings will address the airport’s schedule of fees that may be applicable to their BLM flight 

operations. At a minimum the briefing shall address the following:

• Airport fees such as landing fees, tie down fees and or fuel flowage fees.

• Identify who the contractor is responsible for paying on site / airport. Point of contact with 

the airport authority.

• Fees applicable to BLM operations may be paid for by the BLM unit or through the aircraft 

contract. In instances where the contractor is responsible, units should refer to the 

aviation contract or the contracting officer for specific information on miscellaneous fees 

that are permitted for reimbursement.

Contractors involved with aircraft fueling are held to NFPA 407-Standard for Aircraft Fuel 

Servicing or as otherwise directed by the governing contract.

3.9 End Product Contracts

End Product Contracts are not aircraft flight service contracts. They are used to acquire a 

product for the Department (i.e., per-acre, per-unit, or per-area, or per head basis). The intent of 

this type of procurement is for the contractor to supply all personnel and equipment to provide a 

“service” or “end-result.” Many contractors utilize aircraft (including UAS) to meet the

performance objectives of End Product contracts for activities such as: animal capture, seeding, 

spraying, survey, photography, etc. Since these are not flight services contracts, the AQD does 

not perform any acquisition service. End Product contracts are administered from the state office 

or BLM National Operations Center (NOC) procurement units. All contracts with cost estimates 

greater than $100,000 are administered from the NOC.

Contracting officers, procurement specialists, Bureau program managers and aviation managers 

at all levels must be aware of the requirements outlined within OPM-35.

Understanding the differences between End Product contracts and flight service contracts is 

important to avoid placing the Department with operational control when it is not appropriate.

Attempting to exert any influence on certain aspects of the operation conducted under an End 

Product contract exposes the Department to risks that would be appropriately managed under a 

flight services contract.

These contracts will be conducted in accordance with OPM-35. OPM-35 aids in determining 

whether an operation is being conducted as either “end-product” or “flight service” and 

supplements existing DOI policy regarding End Product contracts found in 353 DM 1.2A (3). If 

the provisions of 353 DM 1.2A (3) and OPM-35 are met, the aircraft (including UAS) will be 

operating as a civil aircraft and the aviation management principles normally required for aircraft 

under BLM operational control do not apply.

3.9.1.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: End Product Contracts

The SAM highly encourages all districts in OR/WA to consider using end-product contracts to the 

maximum extent possible whenever a project need arises that does not require BLM personnel to 

be on board an aircraft or directly controlling operations or is of considerable high risk. Per the NAP, 

“End Product contracts where contractors could conceivably utilize aircraft must be reviewed by the 

BLM SAM prior to solicitation to ensure that specifications and language do not unintentionally

imply or determine aircraft operation control.” The same policy will apply at the district level when 

contracting/procurement staff and resource specialists are developing a local end-product
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

41

solicitation. The UAM must also review the solicitation prior to it being opened for bids. (BLM 

employees should refer to OPM-35 for additional DOI policy guidance.)

3.9.1.2 District Supplement: Local Unit procedures and use of End-Product contracts

3.9.1 End Product Contract Specifications

Specifications in the contract must only describe the desired quantity or quality of the service or 

contracted end-result. BLM contracting officers and resource specialists must consult with BLM 

aviation managers if the acceptable language guidelines do not address a specific project 

requirement or the contract solicitation does not follow the guidelines in OPM-35. End Product 

contracts where contractors could conceivably utilize aircraft (including UAS) must be reviewed 

by the BLM SAM prior to solicitation to ensure that specifications and language do not 

unintentionally imply or determine aircraft operation control. Bureau-wide End Product Contracts 

(i.e., Wild Horse & Burro) must be reviewed by the BLM National Aviation Office prior to 

solicitation. Reference FA-IB-2015-021

The following list describes acceptable contract language for BLM End Product Contracts.

• No contract language describing aircraft (including UAS) or pilot capabilities, standards, 

requirements, or aircraft specific payment provisions.

• The area of work should be described in terms of scale of area, general topography, 

elevation, slope, vegetation, and accessibility by roads or off-road vehicles, land use 

restrictions for mechanized equipment, etc.

• Aviation Regulations - Acceptable Language: “The Contractor must comply with all 

applicable federal, state and local regulations and appropriate land use permitting 

procedures applicable to their operations.”

• Airspace Coordination – In areas of military airspace it is acceptable to describe any BLM 

coordination agreements with military airspace scheduling or range control authorities 

and that it is the contractors’ responsibility to coordinate their activities with the 

scheduling office or Range Control. Close coordination is necessary to ensure 

compliance with applicable airspace coordination agreements that states have with 

military authorities.

• Aircraft Equipment Specifications - Acceptable Language: Delete all reference to aircraft/equipment. Suggested example clause: “...Contractor is required to demonstrate to 

the government that the equipment can capture the imagery and/or data as specified in 

the project description.”

• Radio/Communication Requirements - Acceptable Language: “Contractor must provide a 

communication system so that contractor personnel engaged in the project at different 

locations can communicate at all times with each other, and so that government Project 

Inspectors may communicate with the contractor at any time to discuss performance 

matters.” (The government VHF-FM radio system may have to be described.)

• Application validation: Marking/GPS - Acceptable Language: “Application equipment will 

be capable of physically marking or electronically mapping application routes to ensure 

that seed/fertilizer is applied evenly and completely and at the specified rates.”

• Transporting, Passengers and Equipment - Acceptable Language: “Only approved 

contractor personnel, contractor equipment and government-provided equipment required 

for performance ... will be transported by contractor vehicles, trailers, animals or 

equipment.”

• Safety Hazards - Acceptable Language: “Any ground or aerial hazards that would pose a 

danger to Contractor’s personnel or operating equipment must be identified and mitigated 

by the Contractor prior to commencing operations”.

• Aircraft Use Reporting -: Do not mention or require flight hour/aircraft usage reports.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

42

3.9.2 End Product Project Management

Operational Control: During the performance of End Product contracts, DOI will not exercise 

operational control of the aircraft (including UAS) in any way. DOI will not direct the contractor as 

to flight profiles, flight following, landing areas (except for areas that are off limits due to land 

management restrictions), use of personal protective equipment, etc. DOI personnel assigned to 

administer End Product contracts will have no aviation management responsibility or authority. 

Any directions to the contractor must be in terms of the service or end-result being specified, 

e.g., desired imagery quality, number and disposition of animals surveyed, etc. It is acceptable to 

inform military airspace scheduling authorities or range control that the contractor plans on 

performing work during specified time periods and provide the military authorities the contractor 

contract information. DOI dispatchers will not perform the airspace scheduling service for the 

contractor. DOI personnel must not become involved in any way with aircraft ground operations 

such as take-off and landing areas, loading, fueling, etc. They can, however, be on site for other 

support activities such as setting ground control, scale bars, etc. or collection of data for ground 

truthing to aid in the overall data collection aspects.

BLM Passengers or Aircrew: BLM personnel are not allowed to board any aircraft that is being 

provided by the contractor during performance of the End Product Contract. BLM personnel 

must not become involved in any way with aircraft ground operations such as take-off and 

landing areas, loading, fueling, etc.

Aircraft Use Reporting: Since aircraft utilized by the contractor under DOI End Product 

contracts are operating entirely within the applicable 14 CFR as a civil aircraft, and procurement 

is not through AQD, the Bureau will not submit any billing invoice to AQD in conjunction with End 

Product contracts. Any flight time incurred by the contractor will not be recorded or reported as 

DOI or Bureau aviation statistics.

Aircraft Incidents and Accidents: Although aircraft utilized by the contractor under End 

Product contracts are operating entirely within the applicable 14 CFR as a civil aircraft, mishaps 

should be reported in accordance with 49 CFR 830. To continue to promote aviation safety, the 

Bureau will report aviation incidents or accidents incurred by these contractors to OAS. These 

events should be noted in the Contract Daily Diary and reported through channels as normally 

required for End Product contracts.

Reconnaissance/Observation Flights: Before, during or after the performance of an End 

Product contract it may be necessary for Bureau employees to aerially survey or inspect the 

project area. When flights transporting DOI personnel are required, an AQD aviation “flight 

service” procurement (separate from the End Product contract) is required. Aircraft and pilots

must have current OAS approvals for the intended mission and a current DOI contract or Aircraft 

Rental Agreement must be in place. When a DOI procurement is utilized all DOI and Bureau 

aviation management policy, procedures and requirements must be applied.

Operations within Military Airspace: If an “End Product” contract project using aircraft is being 

conducted within Military Airspace (MOA, RA, MTR) it is the responsibility of the contractor to 

coordinate with the Military Airspace Scheduling Office. DOI Contracting Officers and CORs 

should inform the contractor of any DOI agreements with the Military organizations regarding 

airspace. The Bureau may contact the Scheduling Office to alert them of the project and general 

time frames and provide contractor contact information.

3.10 BLM Supplemental Fire Aircraft Acquisition

When existing contracted aircraft cannot meet all demands, supplemental aircraft will be 

requested and acquired using the following procedures:
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

43

Fire Aircraft Needed Immediately for Initial Attack

• Obtain Bureau or cooperator aircraft from adjacent units under existing mutual aid 

agreements.

• Coordinate with BLM state office to obtain the BLM contracted aircraft from other 

locations within the state.

• Coordinate with the NAO to reassign BLM contracted aircraft from out of state.

• Hire On-Call/CWN aircraft available locally.

Fire Aircraft Needed to Fill Large Fire Orders: Aircraft will be obtained through normal 

dispatch procedures. The BLM exclusive use aircraft are primarily initial attack resources. 

Assignment of these aircraft to ongoing large fires should be the exception and require 

coordination with the State Office.

Severity Fire Aircraft: Statewide needs will be met with existing aircraft within the state 

whenever possible. When state offices determine that supplemental aircraft are needed, they 

may submit a request for fire severity funding to the Fire and Aviation Directorate. Fire severity 

funding is the authorized use of suppression operations funds (normally used exclusively for 

suppression operations and distinct from preparedness funds) for extraordinary preparedness 

activities that are required due to an abnormal increase in fire potential or danger, or to fire 

seasons that either start earlier or last longer than planned in the fire management plan.

Specific direction is stated in Chapter 10 of the Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation 

Operations, which may be found at:

https://www.nifc.gov/sites/default/files/redbook-files/Chapter10.pdf

• The NAO will consolidate and adjudicate all state office supplemental aircraft requests 

and determine the number/type/configuration and procurement method of aircraft. If there 

is a possibility to re-position a BLM aircraft from other areas, the NAO will coordinate the 

re-positioning of the aircraft. NAO then will make recommendations of severity funded 

aircraft needs to FA-300 Fire Operations, which makes final approvals of states’ requests.

• Severity funding covers the following costs: aircraft mobilization, daily availability, per 

diem, proficiency/mission currency, rental vehicle, relief crew transportation, additional 

aviation management personnel base pay (non-fire personnel), travel and per diem.

National Preposition Funding: Units may request national preposition funding to acquire 

supplemental fire operations assets. National preposition funding may be used to mobilize 

resources when BLM units:

• Do not have available preparedness funding

• Do not have available short-term severity funding; or

• Do not meet the criteria for use of national severity funding

Approved national preposition funding may be used only for travel and per diem costs for the 

duration of the assignment, and overtime labor costs associated with the original move. The 

Preposition Request Process can be referenced at:

https://doimspp.sharepoint.com/sites/blm-fa/fire-operations/

3.11 Cooperator Aircraft

Cooperator Aircraft are an affiliated, military, or other Government agency aircraft as defined in 

350 DM 1 Definitions

Cooperative aircraft operations and partnerships are encouraged for the purpose of efficiency 

and standardization in procedure. The NAO and the states shall make a concerted effort to 

establish cooperative structures to increase capability and avoid duplication and conflicting
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

44

procedures.

Use of cooperator aircraft and pilots; affiliate, state/local government, military, or other federal 

agency aircraft by BLM employees may require prior inspection and will require approval by OAS, 

usually in the form of a Letter of Authorization (LOA) and/or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) 

(reference 351 DM 2.5.(3). Proposed use of these aircraft must be requested through the SAM to 

the NAO and include the following:

• Name of cooperator agency and point of contact to include phone numbers and e-mail 

address if available.

• Requested aircraft make and model, pilot(s) name, and support equipment.

• Intended use.

• If reimbursement through IBC is contemplated, a copy of the document(s) authorizing the 

relationship (e.g., multi-agency agreement).

• The requesting bureau point-of-contact to include phone numbers and e-mail address if 

applicable.

• Period of need – single use, single year, or repetitive multiyear.

• Military Aircraft Use (if applicable)

o Coordinate with the appropriate OAS Regional Director to assist in a search for 

commercial resource availability.

o Identify and locate military aircraft capable of meeting identified needs.

o Initiate a written request for non-emergency use to the appropriate OAS Regional 

Director.

 Requests shall include statements that clearly demonstrate that the 

requirement is in the national interest and indicates action taken toward 

obtaining commercial resources.

 Military support specifically authorized by statute negates the requirement for a 

statement concerning national interest. The requesting agency must furnish a

reference to the appropriate statute. 

Any employee who is considering using or flying on a cooperator aircraft must consult their respective 

aviation manager to ensure approvals are in place. States are required to obtain necessary letters of 

authorization in advance of intended use (reference 351 DM 4).

Annual Operating Plans or Interagency Agreements (IAA) specifies how re-imbursement for flight 

services is managed. Note: When using aircraft under USFS contracts reference OPM-39.

3.11.1.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Cooperator Aircraft

Aircraft owned, contracted, and operated by the USFS generally meet the same inspection 

standards as DOI and may be utilized by Bureau employees without additional approval.

However, cooperator aircraft operated by affiliate organizations or partner agencies such as a 

county sheriff, national guard, and state agencies require special approval through a 

Cooperator Aircraft Letter of Approval. References are found in the BLM 9400 aviation policy, 

the BLM NAP, DOI 351DM4, and the FS 5700 manual.

DOI-BLM approval letters are issued by the West Region Director of OAS via the BLM National 

Aviation Office. BLM OR/WA has historically submitted requests for approval letters concurrent 

with USFS Regional inspections and approval. The following is a partial list of the primary 

Cooperator aircraft which are approved annually via a joint USFS/DOI Letter of Approval. Other 

letters to approve additional aircraft are issued as the need arises. The following is a list of 

historical issuances:

• Washington Dept. of Natural Resources:

• 5-7 FEPP UH-1H Huey helicopters plus several support vehicles, pilots, and 

mechanics (named and specified in each annual approval letter.)
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

45

• Washington Army National Guard (WAARNG):

• Variable number (6-7) UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters and pilots for firefightingbucket and cargo only.

• Oregon Dept. of Forestry (ODF):

• 1 Cessna 414 fixed wing and pilot(s) for point-to-point passenger transport.

• Several contract Single Engine Air Tankers (SEATs) and fire helicopters.

• Oregon Army National Guard (ORARNG):

• Variable number of UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters (Fire-bucket and cargo only).

• Hoist capable extraction UH-60 helicopter, when available.

Requests to approve a new cooperator aircraft will be submitted by the UAM to the SAM and 

USFS Regional Aviation Officer (RAO). Adequate lead time of at least two to three months is 

normally necessary to schedule aircraft inspections and secure approvals. In the PNW, the SAM 

will consolidate these requests whenever possible so that a single Interagency Approval Letter 

signed by the OAS West Region Director and RAO may be issued. Approval letters have a oneyear life span and must be carried on board the specified aircraft whenever agency personnel 

are utilizing that aircraft. If there will be an exchange of funds for flight services, there must also 

be an IAA or MOU in place. During the fire season, the annual operating plan of the PNW 

Interagency Master Agreement allows for and authorizes cost sharing and billing between all the

signatory firefighting agencies in the PNW. All Cooperator Letters of Approval are maintained on 

file by the SAM and RAO for those that are interagency in nature. These will be disseminated to 

the UAOs via email as soon as they are issued. There are currently no UAS in use by cooperator 

agencies in the PNW for which a Cooperator Aircraft Letter of Approval has been issued. At this 

time, all cooperator agency UAS will be managed as non-federally approved aircraft as 

addressed in Section 3.11.1 below.

3.11.1 Non-Federally Approved Aircraft

Reference Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations, Chapter 16 for protocols 

regarding utilization of non-federally approved aircraft in response to federal wildfire: 

https://www.nifc.gov/standards/guides/red-book

3.11.1.2 BLM OR/WA Supplement: Non-federally Approved Aircraft

An internal interagency policy memo is updated and reissued annually for BLM OregonWashington and USFS PNW and Alaska on this topic. This memo provides the following 

direction:

1. Non-federally approved aircraft shall not be used on Federal lands, when the BLM or U.S. 

Forest Service (Forest Service) has operational control of the aircraft, unless there is 

human life immediately at risk.

2. Non-federally approved aircraft shall not be used when the BLM or the Forest 

Service is the protecting agency in a reciprocal or off-set agreement.

3. State cooperators may use non-federally approved aircraft on federal lands only 

when state lands are threatened; however, the state shall retain operational control 

of the aircraft and associated financial responsibility.

4. When in unified command, non-federally approved aircraft shall not be used on 

federal lands unless state lands are threatened, and the state shall retain operational 

control of the aircraft. Aircraft shall not be used on unprotected lands unless Federal 

lands are threatened.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

46

Under Clause 27 of the 2014 Master Cooperative Fire Protection Agreement, Independent 

Action, any agency may assign its respective aircraft to an incident in which a wildfire is deemed 

a threat to lands under its jurisdiction. In such instances, the resulting interagency mix of aircraft 

sharing the same airspace is allowed if communications, command/control, and on-scene 

operating procedures exist to ensure a safe and efficient aviation operation. When non-approved 

aircraft are used on Federal lands, the approving agency administrator shall be identified and 

documented in the resource order.

When no federally approved aircraft is available to meet the timeframes needed to address 

human life immediately at risk on a federal fire, a local line officer may approve the use of an 

unapproved aircraft. If the decision is made to use an unapproved aircraft, the line officer must 

call the SO DO at (503) 808-2775 to advise him/her of the risk-informed decision and document

the decision. The DO will then contact the Coordinator on Duty (COD) at the NWCC to notify 

them of the decision and request. The local dispatch center, in coordination with the NWCC, will 

attempt to replace the non-federally approved aircraft with an approved aircraft as soon as 

possible and make the appropriate notification calls. Additional documentation is maintained at 

the local dispatch center that includes the date and time of initial request, who requested the 

aircraft, the time at which the line officer approval was granted, and the number of retardant loads 

requested and delivered.

3.11.1.2 District Supplement: (Identify locally based Cooperator Aircraft and any additional policies on use of 

Cooperator Aircraft, beyond national/state policy.)

3.12 Senior Executive Service (SES) Flights

An aircraft may be used to transport SES personnel to meetings, administrative activities, or 

training sessions when it is the most cost-effective mode of transportation. Prior approval is 

required by the solicitor’s office for employees above the GS/GM-15 level, members of their 

families, and all non-federal travelers on the flight. These flights are typically requested through 

the SAM however some of the responsibilities may be delegated to UAMs (refer to applicable 

State Aviation Plan for specifics). DOI requirements and procedures are outlined in OMB Circular 

A-126 and OPM-07. The OPM and OAS Forms may be found at the OAS document library: 

https://www.doi.gov/aviation/library

• Coordination with the State Aviation Manager prior to any SES flight activity is mandatory.

• All government aircraft use (including SES flights) must be requested and arranged at the 

local level (where the flight is to occur) utilizing a BLM Aircraft Flight Request 9400-1a (or 

equivalent).

• The SES flight requests require a minimum of seven days advance notice.

All point-to-point SES transportation in government aircraft must be evaluated and 

approved by the Department of the Interior (DOI) Solicitor’s Office.

• All mission flights (non-point-to-point transportation), including the SES mission flights, 

will be approved by a local line manager. Special Use mission flights require the 

completion of a Project Aviation Safety Plan (PASP) and local line manager approval. 

Mission flights do not require prior approval from the DOI Solicitor’s Office.

• An AQD-91/Best Value Comparison Form is completed prior to using DOI contract 

aircraft (reference BLM NAP 3.7).

Reference BLM NAP Appendix 3 for SES Flight Scheduling Guide

3.12.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: BLM Senior Executive Service (SES) Flights

All point-to-point SES flights in BLM OR/WA will be ordered and coordinated by the SAM due to the 

complexity of the required documentation package that is submitted to the DOI Solicitor’s Office for
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

47

approval. If the planned flight is going to be a non-fire mission special-use flight on one specific 

district then, that district (i.e., UAM/UAO) will develop the PASP/MASP, provide a qualified flight 

manager, and provide passengers with any required personal protective equipment order.

Additionally, the district will place a request for the appropriate aircraft for the flight. Early 

notification and close coordination with the SAM will be needed so that appropriate justification 

documents (OAS-110) can be prepared and submitted to the Solicitor.

3.13 BLM Law Enforcement Flights

The state and/or unit plan should describe all procedures related to BLM law enforcement aviation 

that occur at that level. Non-DOI contracted aircraft and personnel requires prior to use:

• A fiscal agreement for the exchange of funds (reference 351 DM 4 & OPM-39).

• Aircraft that are not approved by DOI-OAS or USFS (DEA, National Guard, etc.) will 

require a Letter of Authorization (LOA) for those missions not identified in current MOU’s.

3.13.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: OR/WA LE Appendices

Reference Appendix 10; the OR/WA BLM Law Enforcement Aviation Operations Supplement for 

specific guidance on all law enforcement flight activity not governed under incident management 

operational guidance.

3.14 Search and Rescue (SAR) Flights (see also BLM NAP 3.71.1, 5.6, 5.12 & 5.16)

The use of BLM aircraft and aviation personnel for SAR operations are not considered normally 

planned BLM operations. DOI policy (900 DM 1.10 and BLM H-1112-1.40.C) and the Federal

Land Policy and Management Act (43.U.S.C. 1742) provide authority to incur expenses and to take 

a temporary lead role in any SAR emergencies in which immediate and quick response can save 

lives. Request for BLM aircraft to respond to a SAR mission is coordinated through the UAM, 

FMO/Duty Officer/IC and the responsible Line Officer.

• Documentation of the request can be made on a BLM Flight Request 9400-1a (or 

equivalent), on a resource order or in WildCad or equivalent dispatch program.

• Sheriff’s Office SAR: Request for BLM aircraft to assist is typically routed through BLM law 

enforcement officials to the responsible Line Officer. If a request for assistance is made 

directly to the Dispatch Center, the authority to dispatch BLM aircraft and personnel is at the 

District/Field Office Manager level.

• Notification to the Air Force Rescue Coordination Center and FAA of BLM aircraft response 

is required if the SAR involves a missing or downed aircraft (reference Interagency Aviation

Mishap Response Guide).

• BLM Exclusive Use contracted aircraft should not be released from their contract for nonagency search and rescue operations. If the local unit deems that exigent circumstances 

exist, and they are unable to provide funding, the COR will work with the CO to facilitate 

release. The NAO program manager should be notified of any release from contract after the 

fact.

3.14 National Guard and United States Military Aircraft Flights

U.S. Military – Requests for U.S. military aircraft support is per agreement between Department of 

the Interior and Department of Defense. The National Interagency Coordination Center is authorized 

to coordinate for fire and large Incident activations. The Military Use Handbook describes 

procedures. Additionally, there are MOUs for non-fire and LE counterdrug joint missions between 

DOI and DOD. Proposed use of these aircraft must be requested through the SAM. Refer to OAS 

website for current MOU’s and corresponding IBs: https://www.doi.gov/aviation/library

National Guard – Each state typically has an agreement between the State and the National Guard 

for fire support resources. A request for National Guard aviation support is coordinated with the 

Geographic Area Coordination Center (reference National and Geographic Area Mobilization
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

48

Guides, Military Use Handbook, and OPM-41). A Cooperator Letter of Approval is required to be in 

place prior to utilizing National Guard aircraft for those missions not identified in current MOUs.

Additionally, there are MOUs for non-fire and LE counterdrug joint missions between DOI and DOD. 

Refer to OAS website for current MOUs and corresponding IBs: https://www.doi.gov/aviation/library. 

Proposed use of these aircraft must be coordinated through the SAM. Requests for approval for 

those missions not identified in current MOUs must be submitted through the SAM to the NAO.

3.15 Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Flights (see also BLM NAP 5.29)

Policy: BLM UAS operations will be conducted in accordance with the FAA Small Unmanned 

Aircraft Rule (14 CFR, Part 107) and DOI, OPM-11. UAS operations on incidents will be 

conducted in accordance with the NWCG Standards for Fire Unmanned Aircraft Operations

(PMS 515).

• Remote Pilots will possess a DOI Remote Pilot card (OAS-30U) and an FAA Remote 

Pilot certificate. DOI Remote Pilots are required to maintain their FAA Remote Pilot 

certificate as required by FAA.

• Agency owned UAS will be certified by OAS and have a current UAS Data Card (OAS 

36-U). Annual inspections are required. Refer to OPM-11.

• UAS flights will have an airspace authorization (FAA part 107, DOI/FAA MOA, COA, or 

SGI). Refer to OPM-11.

• A signed and approved PASP is required for all non-incident UAS operations. For UAS 

missions occurring on a routine basis, the required PASP can be rolled into a station/unit 

aviation plan (i.e., flight by notification) that is reviewed at least annually (OPM-06).

• All UAS flights will be reported and submitted on an OAS-2U form.

• Personally owned UAS aircraft are not to be used for agency purposes. Agency 

employees are not authorized to purchase UAS with federal funds or utilize personally 

owned UAS for agency purposes.

• Additional information: Interagency UAS Website or Interagency Fire UAS NWCG

Subcommittee Website

Presidential Memorandum, February 15, 2015, Promoting Economic Competitiveness While 

Safeguarding Privacy, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties in Domestic Use of Unmanned Aircraft 

Systems require that:

• Data not essential to the mission of the BLM should be destroyed within 180 days.

• UAS will only be used to collect data consistent with the authorized mission of the BLM. 

Any data-sharing agreements or policies, data use policies, and record management 

policies applicable to UAS shall conform to applicable laws, regulations, and policies.

• UAS collected information can only be shared outside of BLM if it helps to meet the 

authorized mission of this agency.

• It is prohibited to use UAS to collect, use, retain, or disseminate data in any manner that 

would violate the First Amendment or in any manner that would discriminate against 

persons based upon their ethnicity, race, gender, national origin, religion, sexual 

orientation, or gender identity.

• Program evaluations, per NAP 4.5.3, will include review of the unit’s compliance with 

UAS policies and regulations.

UAS Training

• An FAA Remote Pilot certificate (Part 107) is a pre-requisite for training.

• UAS Basic Remote Pilot (IAT, A450) is required for all UAS remote pilots.

• Incident Operations require successful completion of the UAS Incident Operations course 

(S-373).

• Training, certification, and qualification as standards or policy requires.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

49

UAS Purchase

UAS purchase requests are routed to the UAS Program Manager (or designee) via the SAMs. 

State leadership should be notified of UAS purchases. The Program Manager will consolidate all 

requests and forward them to the OAS fleet manager via the Division Chief, Aviation. Purchase 

requests must be documented and approved with the OAS-13U and OAS 93U forms and

forwarded to the UAS Program Manager by the SAM.

Recreational UAS Flights

BLM has no national restrictions for flying UAS for hobby or recreational purposes on public 

lands. People operating UAS for hobby/recreational purposes do not need permission from the 

BLM to fly on public lands as long as they comply with FAA policy and don’t interfere with official 

government business or emergency operations such as wildfire management. Additional 

state/local office guidance may apply.

Non-Recreational (Commercial) UAS Flights

• Conduct flights in accordance with current DOI and FAA policy.

Additional state/local office guidance may apply

Incident Flights

Flights conducted on incidents will be conducted in accordance with:

• FAA Policy

• OPM-11

• NWCG Standards for Fire UAS Operations (PMS 515)

• Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations

UAS Investigation Flights

Flights for the purposes of mishap investigation involving death or injury shall be authorized and 

conducted by pilots identified by the NAO UAS Program Manager in concurrence with the NAO 

Safety Advisor and/or NAO Division Chief.

Cooperator Agency UAS Project Coordination

• Any other federal agency operating UAS within BLM jurisdiction will coordinate with the 

Line Officer and UAM prior to the commencement of UAS flight operations.

UAS Mishaps and SAFECOMS

• UAS mishaps must be reported as per DOI policy. Refer to BLM NAP 4.5.2.

• Cooperator UAS mishaps on BLM jurisdiction will be reported to the Local UAM and the 

program manager. DOI mishap reporting policies also apply.

3.16.1 UAS Flights: BLM UAS Operations may only be performed by the following methods:

• Agency employees who are appropriately trained and DOI-certified Remote Pilots/UAS 

Operators using DOI-approved equipment. (Ref. NAP Sec. 3.16 above and Sec. 5.29).

• Agency procured contract UAS flight services: Missions performed under a DOI EU, on-call, 

or CWN “flight services” contract in accordance with NAP Sec. 3.7 above.

• End Product contracts, to acquire data or imagery only, as described in Sec. 3.9 above.

• Cooperator agency aircraft operated for BLM under a current Cooperator Aircraft Letter of 

Approval signed by the West Regional Director of OAS (ref. NAP Sec. 3.11 above).

All other government use of UAS on BLM lands are considered “non-federally approved aircraft” 

operations which is addressed in Sec. 3.11.1 above.

Government procurement of UAS equipment: All requests to procure DOI-approved UAS
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

50

equipment with government funds that will be operated by DOI trained and certified operators must 

be routed through the SAM before being submitted to DOI-OAS via the BLM National Aviation 

Office-UAS Program Manager. Once any UAS equipment has been acquired and issued to state 

office or district level employees remain as DOI OAS property on the OAS property inventory. The 

BLM districts and states are not authorized to independently procure any aircraft (including UAS)

outside of national channels.

Use of cooperator agency or an affiliate organization UAS on/for BLM projects under 

agreements or MOUs with cooperators: Questions frequently arise regarding the Bureau’s use of 

UAS that are operated in cooperative partnerships with State/county agencies, university research 

scientists, non-profit environmental interest organizations, etc. BLM may work in cooperative 

partnerships with such entities without a Cooperator Aircraft Letter of Approval ONLY when:

• The BLM does not have operational control of the UAS flight and is not directing any aspect 

of the operation of that aircraft.

• The BLM is not paying for flight services. Our interest is limited to only acquiring or sharing of 

the data or imagery that is captured by the on-board sensors or camera.

• The entity or person having operational control of the UAS has an FAA Part 107 certificate 

that allows them to operate a UAS for commercial or research purposes, and the Operator 

complies with all applicable FAA operating regulations when conducting a flight for the 

purpose of sharing data with the BLM. Note: The BLM reserves the right to see the 

Operator’s Part 107 certificate or FAA-Certificate of Authorization (COA) to ensure the 

Bureau is not inadvertently associated with a UAS flight operation that could potentially not 

be compliant with the 14 CFR Federal Aviation Regulations.

• A courtesy call is made to the appropriate agency or interagency Dispatch Center and UAM 

for the sake of safety and deconfliction in case the agency is planning a manned aircraft 

mission in the same general location and time as the UAS operation.

• At the discretion of the BLM line officer or agency administrator, a land use permit may be 

required for the non-BLM entity having operational control to take off and land on BLM public 

lands.

Use of personally owned UAS for Agency purposes: In addition to what is stated in NAP, Sec.

3.0 (ref. the sixth bullet item under “Policy” above): It is not uncommon for BLM employees to own 

and operate UAS for personal recreation or hobby purposes, or as an FAA certified Part 107 

Remote Pilot on their own time outside of work with the BLM. BLM employees may not perform 

government work using personal manned aircraft or UAS equipment on behalf of any Bureau 

program including, but not limited to; fire or resource reconnaissance, wildlife monitoring, census, or 

habitat surveys, archeological site inventories, stream surveys, visitor use monitoring in WSAs, 

filming activities or scenic areas to post on a BLM website to promote recreational opportunities on 

BLM lands, etc. In all cases, only DOI (or USFS) certified pilots operating DOI (or USFS) 

inspected/carded aircraft, or operators in the categories of procurement or use described above 

(contract, end-product, etc.) may conduct government business or fly on behalf of a Bureau 

program.

Acceptance of unsolicited “free” UAS flight services: Employees of USFS and BLM continue to 

be approached by vendors, organizations, and researchers who wish to demonstrate the capability 

of their UAS technology to our agencies, either for compensation or under the guise of a cost-free 

demonstration. Agency employees are often eager to observe the capability of new technology 

which may lead to inadvertent policy deviations or unauthorized commitments. Accepting a free 

service can lead to an expectation by a vendor that we will hire them in the future as a sole source. 

In one case, a vendor initially said they would provide aerial UAS imagery to the government for 

free, but then attempted to submit a bill for their services after a government employee reviewed the 

data acquired by the UAS sensors and gave positive feedback. Employees should also use caution 

to avoid making an “unauthorized commitment” to compensate any vendor for unsolicited data or 

imagery or flight services outside of an agency-approved procurement process. BLM Instruction
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

51

Memorandum OR-2018-002 defines this as “an agreement or commitment that is not binding solely 

because it was incurred by a BLM employee who does not have the authority to enter into that 

agreement on behalf of the Government.” Such action may constitute a contract ratification for 

which the employee may be held personally liable and fiscally responsible.

3.16.2 District Supplement:

3.17 Dispatching BLM Aircraft - Flight Requests

All flights will be arranged by aviation dispatchers and/or appropriate aviation manager except 

for:

• Flights with a scheduled air carrier on a seat fare basis (Part 121 or 135 scheduled flights 

open to the public on a ticket sale basis). Seat fare is defined as the cost for a DOI 

employee to occupy one seat between two different airports/heliports when the aircraft is

not under the exclusive control of the DOI. It does not include any charter or on- demand 

operation.

• Transactions to acquire an End Product contract.

All BLM flights must:

• Be approved at the appropriate management level.

• Be authorized and documented prior to takeoff.

• Use approved pilots and aircraft as directed by the DMs.

• Allow only authorized passengers.

• All passengers shall be given a preflight safety briefing by the pilot or qualified aircrew 

member as per 351 DM 1.5.B. 

• For all flights utilizing DOI contract aircraft, the ordering official/user must assure that 

there is an Interagency Agreement in place with AQD that includes approved funding for 

the flight (reference NAP 3.7).

The BLM standard format for aviation operations is Degrees and Decimal Minutes (DDD o 

MM.MMM’). Reference BLM NAP Appendix 3 for additional details. Utilization of the correct format 

must be discussed between dispatch and the flight crew to assure accurate navigation.

• Note: The format for the US NOTAM OFFICE for Temporary Flight Restrictions issued by 

the FAA and in IROC will be in a Degree, Minutes and Seconds, input with NO punctuation 

(ddmmssN/dddmmssW).

A BLM Aircraft Flight Request 9400-1a (or equivalent) is required to be completed for all non-fire 

flights that do not require a PASP (reference BLM NAP 4.3.2). The 9400-1a Form (Aircraft Flight 

Request/Schedule) can be accessed at:

https://www.nifc.gov/about-us/our-partners/blm/aviation/administration

The UAM must review the 9400-1a (or equivalent) Flight Request and obtain approval by 

appropriate level of authority as determined by the Unit’s Line Management and documented in the 

Unit Aviation Plan.

3.17.1 Categories of Flight with specific procedures regarding Flight Requests: Life

Threatening Emergency Flight Requests (See also BLM NAP 3.14, 5.6 & 5.16)

• Requests for aircraft to meet life threatening emergency needs should be filled with the 

closest available aircraft with the appropriate capability for the mission.

• Normal protocols associated with ordering/hiring of aircraft can be addressed as time allows 

after the initial response.

• Local Line Officers are responsible for all aviation activities within their jurisdiction. The
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

52

response to a life-threatening emergency must be coordinated with the UAM, FMO/Duty 

Officer and Line Officer.

Non-Fire Point to Point Flight Requests (see NAP 5.7 Categories of Flight)

• Prior to hiring or arranging for the flight: Complete a cost analysis comparing costs of using a 

chartered or government owned aircraft versus commercial airline or driving, time frame 

requirements, other associated costs. An example Travel Cost Analysis Form (OAS-110) is 

located at: https://www.doi.gov/aviation/library/opm

• Prior to flight: 9400-1a (or equivalent) is completed. UAM reviews and appropriate approval 

obtained (state or local unit determination).

• AQD-91 and Best Value Comparison forms are not required for exclusive use aircraft but are 

required when comparing rentals to fleet, etc. (reference BLM NAP 3.7).

• Flight Manager designated when required (reference National Interagency Mobilization

Guide Chapter 20, BLM NAP 2.6, for specific responsibilities).

• Resource tracking method determined (reference National and Geographic Mobilization

Guide for details).

Non-Fire Special Use Activities (see NAP 5.7 Categories of Flight)

• Lead time for flight request, IAA & Task Order issuance, as described in Unit Aviation Plan.

• UAM to assess project/mission complexity; determine whether a PASP is required (reference 

BLM NAP 4.3.2).

• 9400-1a (or equivalent) is approved by the appropriate level of authority for low complexity 

one-time types of missions.

• If a PASP is required (reference BLM NAP 4.3.2), a 9400-1a Form may be used for dispatch 

office internal flight tracking purposes.

• AQD-91/Best Value Comparison Form is not required for exclusive use aircraft but is 

required when comparing rentals to fleet, etc. (reference BLM NAP 3.7).

Fire Point to Point and Fire Training Flight Requests (BLM Operational Control)

• Dispatch office receives a request, completes a resource order per dispatch procedures.

• UAM/Dispatch assures the front page of a 9400-1a Flight Request/Schedule or equivalent 

Aircraft Flight Strip (per Dispatch SOP) completed.

• The BLM Fire IAA # is used, and the DOI Fire contract Task Order # for the hired vendor is 

used.

• Flight Manager designated when required (reference National Interagency Mobilization

Guide Chapter 20, BLM NAP 2.6, for specific responsibilities).

• Resource tracking method determined (reference National and Geographic Mobilization 

Guides for details).

• Training: Fire training flight requests are made by the supervisor/manager (Helitack, SEAT, 

and Aerial Supervision) to the FMO, duty officer, UAM and coordinated with the aircraft 

dispatcher.

• Contractor directed training flights are coordinated with the PI, airbase manager, or UAM. 

These flights are the responsibility of the contractor. The Dispatcher/UAM is responsible for 

conducting and documenting a cost comparison and Contractor selection rationale prior to 

hiring aircraft. (Reference BLM NAP 3.2 for documentation retention)

Fire Operations Flight Requests

• Requests come from:

o Incident Commander (IC) or designated incident personnel (i.e., AOBD, ASGS, 

ATGS/ATS).

o FMO or duty officer.

o Per unit dispatching plan.

• Initial Attack aircraft requests can be documented on a Resource Order and/or Aircraft
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

53

Dispatch form.

• Initial Attack aircraft requests should be ordered on a Resource Order via IROC and/or 

Aircraft Dispatch Form. Generating and awaiting a Resource Order should not affect the 

response time for an initial attack mobilization within the host Geographic Area or with 

neighborhood agreements across Geographic Area boundaries through established dispatch 

ordering channels. Resource orders through IROC can be provided after mobilization has 

occurred for initial attack. BLM Initial Attack aircraft may be launched to new incidents with 

just the location, bearing, distance and flight following frequency. All other pertinent 

information will be provided to aircrews while enroute to include:

i. Destination latitude – longitude coordinates (Degrees and Decimal Minutes 

(DDD o MM.MMM’)

ii. Radio frequencies - air to air/air to ground/flight following

iii. Incident name/contact (if any)

iv. Airspace hazards and dispatch boundary concerns

v. Other aircraft on scene or enroute

• The Dispatcher/UAM is responsible for conducting and documenting a cost comparison and 

Contractor selection rationale prior to hiring aircraft. (Reference BLM NAP 3.2 for 

documentation retention)

• The BLM Fire IAA # is used, and the DOI Fire contract Task Order # is used.

3.18 Aircraft Use Payment Systems

Aviation Information Report Support (AIRS): AIRS is an IBC web-based system utilized by 

vendors for generating and processing flight use invoices.

• BLM-AK currently renders payment to non-fire vendors via the BLM-AK Pilot Project.

AIRS training - https://www.doi.gov/aviation/aviation-information-report-support-airs-help-video

AIRS Help Desk - Email: AIRS_access@ibc.doi.gov Phone: (208) 433-5010

Internet Payment Platform (IPP): The Internet Payment Platform (IPP) is a comprehensive 

electronic invoicing and payment information service made available to all Federal agencies and 

their suppliers by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Management Service (FMS).

IPP centralizes transaction processing in the order-to-payment notification cycle, including purchase 

orders, invoices, and payments: https://www.ipp.gov/

Aircraft Use Report Manager (AURM): The AURM is used within DOI for government owned 

“Fleet” aircraft billing to create aircraft use report data files which are emailed to 

OASfleetmanager@ios.doi.gov for uploading into the FBMS system. OAS Technical Services has 

also developed a "next generation" Aircraft Use Report Manager application for iPads.

Forest Service Incident Business System (IBS): Flight time, daily availability, and other 

authorized charges or deductions shall be recorded on a Flight Use Report in IBS for all USFS 

contracted aircraft. The data shall be entered and reviewed by the government and the contractor’s 

representative. BLM employees (including BLM AD employees) that are flight or aircraft managers 

with responsibility to input flight use data into the USFS IBS will need to register with the USFS IBS 

program. IBS can be found at: apps.fs.usda.gov/ibs (in Google Chrome only).

3.19 Coding for Flight Use Reports

Documentation of all non-fleet flight services is accomplished on an AMD-23E Aircraft Use Report 

form, which is then entered by the vendor into AIRS. The hard copy form acts as the ‘Field 

Receiving Report’ which provides evidence that the flight information is accurate. Until further notice, 

AIRS will be the Government’s “Electronic Receiving Report”, which supports Contractor payments
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

54

that are invoiced and paid through IPP.

BLM SAMs serve as the COR for exclusive use contract aircraft in their state. As such, they are 

responsible for ensuring that designated alternate CORs and aircraft managers are informed of all 

coding requirements and that flight invoices are properly completed. BLM pilots, in coordination with 

the SAM, are similarly responsible for proper flight invoice coding for fleet aircraft.

The following business rules apply to all BLM contracted aircraft:

3.19.1 Task “Order” Number: The contract number to be identified on the AMD-23E forms is the 

appropriate order number that was issued by the CO for the applicable contract.

• Reference https://www.doi.gov/aviation/aqd for On-Call Fire Suppression Task Order 

Numbers for specific type of contract being utilized.

3.19.2 Billee Code: Billee Codes are a required field, for payment by AQD, on the AMD-23E. The 

Billee Code is a good method to query reports in FBMS and should continue to be utilized for that 

purpose.

• For Exclusive Use contract aircraft, the “Hiring Unit” Billee Code will be used regardless of 

the operating location for all Pay Item codes when utilizing a BLM Task Order number.

3.19.3 Charge Codes: New direction now allows for simplified coding for aircraft costs associated 

with suppression related charges and Fire Exclusive Use Availability. The following outlines new 

procedures for inputting financial coding on the AMD-23E form.

BLM Nationally Funded SEAT’s: Separate guidance will be provided annually to address coding 

for nationally funded SEATs.

BLM Fire Exclusive Use contracted aircraft:

Availability during MAP:

• FA540 – This is the financial code for entry in the “Charge Code” section of the AMD-23 for 

EU Availability only.

 Do not use “FA-540” for anything other than “AV” during the exclusive use mandatory 

availability period.

Availability during Contract Extension:

• Appropriate four-digit only “Fire Code” (suppression/severity/GACC support code) or;

• Entire (Cost Center, Functional Area and WBS) cost string if utilizing Preparedness (LF100), 

Pre-Positioning (LF561) or other non-fire funds.

All other pay item codes (FT, SM, PD, EP, ET, SC, etc.):

• Appropriate four-digit only “Fire Code” (suppression/severity/GACC support code) or;

• Entire (Cost Center, Functional Area and WBS) cost string if utilizing Preparedness (LF100), 

Pre-Positioning (LF561) or other non-fire funds.

BLM hired On Call/CWN/ARA fire aircraft:

Availability:

• Appropriate four-digit only “Fire Code” (suppression/severity/GACC support code) or;

• Entire (Cost Center, Functional Area and WBS) cost string if utilizing Preparedness (LF100), 

Pre-Positioning (LF561) or other non-fire funds.

All other pay item codes (FT, SM, PD, EP, ET, SC, etc.):

• Appropriate four-digit only “Fire Code” (suppression/severity/GACC support code) or;
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

55

• Entire (Cost Center, Functional Area and WBS) cost string if utilizing Preparedness (LF100), 

Pre-Positioning (LF561) or other non-fire funds.

BLM-hired On Call/CWN/ARA non-fire aircraft:

• Entire (Cost Center, Functional Area and WBS) cost string for all charges.

• Additional guidance specific to utilizing non-fire aircraft is referenced in BLM NAP 3.7.1, 

3.7.2, 3.8.3, 3.8.4 and 3.17.1

3.19.4 Mission Use Codes: Mission Codes apply only to AMD-23E line entries for flight time. (For 

all non-flight time entries AQD will input a default mission code and are not required to be filled out 

by either the aircraft manager or the pilot.) Each specific type of flight will have the unique mission 

use code recorded. Example: A helicopter flies a total of 2.1 hours but does 1.1 hours of bucket 

work; 0.5 hours initial attack delivery of firefighters, and 0.5 hours of recon. Each type of flight will be 

shown on its own line entry with the specific mission use codes.

3.20 FEPP

Reserved

3.21 FBMS

All BLM financial activities are managed through the DOI FBMS program. All fire-retardant 

expenditures (Full-service contract and bulk purchase) are entered into FBMS by the district or state 

level designated officials (reference state and unit aviation plans).

End of Year financial procedures are announced via the Departmental and Bureau Instruction 

Memorandum (IM) system.

3.22 Aviation Program Reviews

Details about aviation program evaluations and fire preparedness reviews are described in BLM 

NAP 4.5.3.

3.23 New Program Requests

New program requests involving aerial assets, not already approved by BLM, must be routed 

through the State Director to the Division Chief, Aviation for approval. Upon NAO approval, new 

program requests will be forwarded for consideration of approval to the Associate Director, OAS. 

This request shall include a copy of the NAO approval, and a proposed Operations Plan. New 

Program Request Form is available on the NAO website.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

56

4.0 Aviation Safety Management Systems 

4.1 General

The BLM Aviation Safety program is modeled after the aviation industry and FAA Safety 

Management Systems (SMS). Each BLM employee and contractor involved with aviation has the 

responsibility to plan missions thoroughly, conduct missions with a conservative attitude, and 

respect for the aircraft and environment in which the missions operate. The intent is to improve 

the aviation culture by increasing hazard identification, reduce risk taking behavior, learn from 

mistakes, and correct procedures before a mishap occurs rather than after the accident.

The BLM NAO Aviation Safety & Training Advisor is the focal point for the BLM national level 

program. SAMs are the focal point for state aviation programs, and the unit aviation manager 

(UAM) is the focal point for district/field office aviation program.

4.2 Safety Management Systems (SMS)

SMS serves to structure the BLM existing safety initiatives and provides a review process for 

how well those initiatives function. SMS is not a safety program; rather it is a system which 

organizes existing safety processes around the concept of system safety and the four pillars 

(Policy, Risk Management, Safety Assurance and Safety Promotion). SMS incorporates a 

proactive approach using hazard identification and risk management to achieve accident 

prevention. Additional information regarding SMS is available at the Lessons Learned website: 

http://www.wildfirelessons.net/Home/

4.2.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: (SMS)

The SAM is responsible for managing a statewide BLM Aviation Accident Prevention program in 

OR/WA. This is frequently accomplished in partnership with the USFS-R6 Regional Aviation Safety 

Manager (RASM) via training sessions, briefings, site visits, information sharing with the field, 

preparedness reviews, etc. The SAM and RASM are co-members of the PNWCG Aviation 

Committee and are liaisons to the UAO Working Team.

The SAM implements all components of SMS via the following duties and responsibilities:

• Provides safety briefings and leads discussions for BLM and cooperator (interagency) 

employees in a variety of venues including the PNW Fire and Aviation Leadership Team

and agency administrator workshops, as an IAT course instructor, and at workshops for 

Helicopter Managers, Airtanker Base Managers, SEAT Managers, and Dispatchers.

• Performs interagency aviation safety related task assignments for PNWCG to include 

participation on ASATs. (See Sec. 4.5.1 of NAP below.)

• Manages the SAFECOM program in BLM OR/WA, writes corrective action response 

statements, and addresses or elevates issues.

• Reviews BLM and Interagency PASP/MASPs, providing suggestions and edits for enhanced 

language in the Risk Assessment portion.

• Disseminates DOI and Interagency Safety Alerts, PASP/MASPs, and other aviation safety 

information via email to the UAMs and other field aviation users.

• Conducts site visits to airbases, project sites, and fire incidents to meet with the Air 

Operations Brand Directors (AOBD), flight crews, fire managers, line officers, and UAOs. 

Assists with aviation mishap investigations as needed or requested on behalf of the State 

Office or NAO.

• Evaluates new IAT Instructors as a designated IAT evaluator to ensure quality aviation 

safety presentations are occurring at the field level.

4.2.2 District Supplement: (Describe how SMS is implemented on the local unit level.)
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

57

4.3 Policy

SMS is a critical element of management responsibility in determining the agency’s safety policy 

and SMS also defines how the agency intends to manage safety as an organizational core 

function.

• Policy guides aviation safety doctrine, philosophy, principles, and practices.

• Policy provides framework for aviation plans (reference BLM NAP 3.3).

• Policy assists in the development of local standard operating procedures.

• Policy will foster and promote doctrinal principles and safety management systems within 

the states.

Aviation management policies describe authorities, responsibilities, acceptable operating 

practices, and administrative procedures. These directives provide the structure for the SMS to 

effectively function. Safety is a product of effective policy and management processes. All 

aviation safety standards and policy requirements identified in the BLM NAP 1.6 must be 

followed.

4.3.1 Aviation Life Support Equipment (ALSE)

All personnel engaged in aviation activities must wear appropriate Personal Protective 

Equipment (PPE), depending on the mission (reference NAP 5.4 and 350 DM 1.2.C regarding 

flights on foreign aircraft in foreign countries). Requirements are listed in 351 DM 1.7 and 

outlined in the ALSE Handbook and mission specific guides and handbooks. Reference BLM

NAP 5.22 and 5.27.1 for additional PPE requirements utilized for helicopter operations and low 

level (less than 500’ AGL) fixed-wing flight operations. Any questions concerning the 

requirements and procedures for obtaining PPE are directed to the local aviation manager.

Project leaders must ensure that appropriate and adequate ALSE, including PPE, is available

and worn by individuals. If required ALSE is not available, all flights will be canceled or 

postponed.

4.3.2 Project Aviation Safety Planning (PASP*)

Accident prevention is paramount when planning individual aviation projects. Flights may not 

deviate from Department and Bureau policy and procedures, except for safety of flight 

considerations. A PASP is required for non-fire Special Use Activities. A 9400-1a (or equivalent) 

may be completed in lieu of the PASP for a low complexity/one-time non-fire mission flights. The 

PASP or 9400-1a must be reviewed by the UAM and approved by the appropriate level of 

authority per the state/unit aviation plan. Managers must be briefed by the UAM prior to their 

approval of the plan.

• PASPs that have a final risk assessment of high will require a SAM review prior to line 

manager approval.

• A courtesy copy of all PASPs will be routed to the SAM prior to implementation.

Projects/flights that occur periodically over a season or fiscal year can have one PASP prepared 

and approved. In this situation a 9400-1a (or equivalent) will be required for each periodic flight. 

The 9400-1a approval level would be at the UAM level with a courtesy notification to the SAM.

For projects/flights that are conducted by a unit’s aviation operations group (helitack, aerial 

supervision, smokejumpers, UAS) if the project/flight is typical and routine to the operational 

group with mission risk assessment documented in the group’s annual operations plan and the 

state and unit plan allows; then the project/flight can be conducted, without a specific PASP, after 

completion of 9400-1a documentation.

• “PASPs developed for reoccurring projects will be reviewed, updated and signed each 

year (not to exceed12 months).
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

58

• Routine, time critical UAS flights may utilize the Flight by Notification in lieu of completing 

an entire new PASP if the mission falls within the overarching/blanket PASP identified 

within the Unit Aviation Plan. (Reference BLM NAP 5.29)

Required elements of a PASP include:

• Project name/Objectives/Supervision

• Justification

• Project date and location

• Projected cost of aviation resources and funding code(s)

• Desired aircraft, make/model, pilot skills (Included if available and/or specific N# and pilot 

to be noted on 9400-1a)

• Communication Plan, Flight following and emergency search and rescue plan

• Flight routes/areas and altitudes

• Hazard identification (e.g., weather, takeoff or landing weights, landing areas, wire 

hazards, etc.)

• Wire Strike Prevention (352DM1.9.D)

o Flight Environment Considerations: Bureau projects often dictate that flights be 

conducted in close proximity to the ground where wires are prevalent

o Risk Assessment/Hazard Maps: To reduce wire strike potential, it is critical that a risk 

assessment be conducted prior to all low-level flights. A low-level flight hazard map 

must be constructed for the local operational area. All preplanned low-level flights 

require a thorough map reconnaissance of the route to be flown

• Description of take-off and landing areas

• Pre-flight briefings/After Action Reviews

• Participants: List individuals involved in flights, their qualifications (HMGB, Aircrew 

Member, Passenger, etc.) dates of last aviation training and include individual’s project 

responsibilities

• Aircraft and equipment approval

• Airspace Coordination and Aerial hazard identification

• Risk assessment utilizing the SMS worksheets as appropriate

• Personal protective clothing/equipment (if required)

• Load calculations and/or weight and balance information requirements

• Unit Aviation Manager’s review and signature (not to exceed 12 months if reoccurring 

project)

• Project Lead Supervisor’s and line officer’s approval signature (not to exceed 12 months 

if reoccurring project). See NAP 6.2 for Management Responsibilities and training 

requirements.

A good resource for aviation project planning can be found in the NSHO Chapter 3. Personnel 

needing assistance with mission flight or project planning requirements should contact their 

unit/state aviation manager. Risk assessments of the relevant project hazards can utilize maps, 

aerial photos, Google Earth photos, and SkyVector.com maps to help identify and map out 

where the hazards are located. Particular attention in the risk assessment is essential when 

determining how to mitigate the risk by reducing exposure to hazards in flight profiles, method of 

operations, external load operations, winter weather, and high/hot/heavy operations.

*U.S. Forest Service uses the title Mission Aviation Safety Plan (MASP) to meet the same 

objective.

4.3.2.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: PASP/MASP

It should be noted that the PNW uses the new term MASP in place of or interchangeable with PASP 

as a PNW interagency standard. You will see the two terms used and mean the same thing.

At least two weeks of advanced notice is normally required for most non-fire PASP/MASPs to be
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

59

developed, reviewed, and routed for approval signature. Local unit aviation plans may specify 

additional needed lead time.

The BLM OR/WA requires a PASP/MASP for every mission regardless of complexity. The NAP

statement that “The reverse side of the 9400-1a may be used as a PASP/MASP for low complexity, 

one-time non- fire mission flights” applies only in rare circumstances and with case-by-case SAM 

approval. The process of identifying hazards and developing mitigation strategies using the formal 

risk assessment process of a PASP is an effective tool for briefing line officers, supervisors, pilots, 

and Aircrew.

Interagency projects that involve BLM and USFS personnel require the PASP/MASP to be reviewed 

by both the BLM SAM and the USFS RASM. Only line officers, i.e., the BLM DM or field manager 

are authorized to approve PASP/MASPs. When multiple agency employees are involved in a 

mission, only the approval signature by the line officer of the agency having operational control is 

normally required. (Some projects, such as an interagency wild horse census, may require both 

agency line officers’ signatures.) By signing a PASP/MASP, a line officer is certifying that he/she 

accepts the remaining “residual” risk after mitigations are implemented and has determined that the 

benefits of allowing the mission to proceed outweigh that residual risk.

A briefing on hazards and an assessment of risk are also required on the day of each flight. Items to 

consider include the current and forecast weather conditions, the status of personnel assigned, and 

any last minute logistical or mission requirements that could affect complexity or risk. Likewise, 

each mission should conclude with a debriefing or After-Action-Review (AAR).

UAOs are asked to use the PNW MASP format (version 13 currently) which meets the BLM 

standards found in this document as well as the USFS-FSM 5711.1 policy requirement.

PASPs used for multiple recurring missions over a period are only valid for one year from 

the date the PASP/MASP was signed and approved by a line officer. No mission is authorized 

to be flown under any PASP/MASP after one year until it has been reviewed, edited, and re-signed 

with a new approval signature by a unit line officer.

The NWCG Aviation Risk Management Workbook, PMS 530-1is available at: NWCG Aviation Risk

Management Workbook, PMS 530-1 | NWCG

Additional information about the process is found in the National Standards for Helicopter 

Operations (NSHO) Chapter 3 at https://www.nwcg.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pms510.pdf

4.3.2.2 District Supplement: Local procedures for processing PASP/MASPs

4.3.3 Aircraft Accident Investigation Process

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has the responsibility to investigate all aviation 

accidents except for military (49 CFR Parts 830 and 831, Public Law 106-181, and Federal 

Management Regulation 102-33.185). OAS Chief of Aviation Safety is typically invited by the 

NTSB to be a party to the investigation. NTSB is still the controlling authority. Policy, including 

responsibilities and procedures concerning DOI aircraft mishaps are contained in 352 DM 3. Two 

Bureau positions may be established to assist the DOI Investigation Team: 1) as a selected 

member of the investigation team working directly for the OAS Safety Investigator-In-Charge 

(IIC), or 2) as the Bureau-designated on-site liaison to coordinate with the OAS Safety 

Investigator-In-Charge. NOTE: In many cases, the Bureau will provide only one representative to 

the investigation team and that individual will perform only as a liaison, or as both a team 

member and a liaison. OAS Chief of Aviation Safety, as the Departments representative to the 

NTSB, will determine who will participate. The NTSB IIC will then either accept or deny the 

individuals proposed by the Chief, or OAS IIC.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

60

The BLM investigation team member:

• Must be requested by OAS to be an investigation team member.

• Will be appointed by the BLM Aviation Division Chief.

• Will normally be BLM NAO staff members or SAM.

• Must not have a personal interest in the mishap.

• Will work directly with the OAS Safety Investigator-In-Charge (IIC).

• Is bound by confidentiality regarding all aspects of the investigation and preliminary 

findings and conclusions.

• Will at no time express opinions of their own or recite opinions of others on the team.

The BLM Liaison:

• Will be appointed by the BLM Aviation Division Chief (FA-500).

• Will provide on-site coordination and support to the OAS Safety IIC for personnel, 

resources, transportation, office space, communications, etc.

• Will coordinate and facilitate in and out-briefings with local BLM management.

• Will serve as liaison between the investigation team and local BLM management, BLM 

specialists and/or incident management team.

• Will provide the IIC with technical expertise and Bureau organizational information.

• Will make arrangements for interviews, site visits, document review, etc.

• Will not conduct interviews or investigative actions unless requested by the IIC.

• Will be bound by confidentiality regarding all aspects of the investigation and preliminary 

findings and conclusions.

• Will at no time express opinions of their own or recite opinions of others on the team

• Must not have a personal interest in the mishap.

4.4 Risk Management

Risk management enables personnel at all levels to do exactly what the term implies: manage 

risks. The process of risk management applies to programs and operational missions. The risk 

management process is designed to mitigate risk to acceptable levels by the identification, 

assessment, and prioritization of risks followed by coordinated application of resources to 

minimize, monitor, and control the probability and/or impact of unfortunate events.

These basic decision-making principles must be applied before any anticipated job, task, or 

mission is performed:

• Accept no unnecessary risk: Unnecessary risk does not contribute to the safe 

accomplishment of a task or mission. The most logical choices for accomplishing a 

mission are those that meet all the mission requirements while exposing personnel and 

resources to the lowest possible risk.

• Make risk decisions at the appropriate level: Making risk decisions at the appropriate 

level establishes clear accountability. Those accountable for the success or failure of a 

mission must be included in the risk decision process. Supervisors at all levels must 

ensure subordinates know how much risk they can accept and when they must elevate 

the decision to a higher level.

• Accept risk when benefit outweighs cost: Weighing risks against opportunities and 

benefits helps to maximize unit capability. Even high-risk endeavors may be undertaken 

when there is clear knowledge that the sum of the benefits exceeds the sum of the 

potential costs.

• Integrate risk management into planning and execution at all levels: To effectively 

apply risk management, leaders at all levels must dedicate time and resources to 

incorporate risk management principles into the planning and execution phases of all 
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

61

operations. Integrating risk management into planning as early as possible provides the 

decision maker with the greatest opportunity to apply risk management principles.

Risk assessment can be divided into three levels:

• Time Critical: This method is an “on-the-run” mental or verbal review of the situation 

using the risk management process without necessarily recording the information. The 

process is used to consider risk while making decisions in a time limited situation. Rapid 

risk assessment requires effective training of personnel, effective operational practices 

and a thorough understanding of objectives of the mission.

o Note that “time critical” does not mean “hasty” or “uninformed.”

• Deliberate: This method is used when planning time permits. It involves systematic risk 

identification, risk assessment/analysis, consideration of control options and risk decision

making, implementation of controls, and supervision. Note that all of these may be 

applied to time critical risk management; however, the time frame in which the rapid 

examination is performed is extremely compressed by the urgency of the situation. This 

will involve documentation of the process and actions.

• Strategic: Strategic Risk management is conducted at the highest levels of the 

organization and is typically applied to multiple systems type complexity and requires 

professional reviews. This method should be used in instances where new technology, 

change, or development of new programs or activities. It involves an analysis of 

cost/benefit of mitigations. The strategic process produces a more permanent record of 

findings and decisions used for long term planning, organizational decision-making,

and as authoritative training resources.

Risk Management Process: The process by which risk is managed is ongoing throughout the 

mission. It starts in the planning stage, continues to the approval and scheduling phase, is 

evaluated, and adapted during the execution phase and is analyzed and collected as lessons 

learned in the post flight phase. Reference NWCG Standards for Aviation Risk Management. 

• Identify Hazards: The first step in risk management is to identify hazards. The hazards 

are the potential sources of danger that could be encountered while performing a task or 

mission. Hazards include, but are not limited to, weather, time of flight, terrain, 

equipment, training, and proficiency level of personnel.

• Assess Hazards: Hazard or risk assessment is part of the risk management process. 

Risk assessment can range from simple to complex but must be detailed. The process of 

assessing hazard causes personnel to analyze the degree of risk associated with each 

threat, and place these in perspective relative to the objectives of the mission and 

organization.

• Develop Controls/Make Risk Decisions: Starting with the highest threat, identify the 

risk control options that reduce exposure to the threats for all of those identified in the 

previous steps that exceed an acceptable level of risk. 

• Implement Controls/Execute and Monitor: Implement the plan and ensure that the risk 

controls are known by all and are utilized. Ensure that people know and do what is 

expected of them. A high level of risk that cannot be effectively controlled should be 

reported to the person supervising the operation. Continually evaluate the effectiveness 

of the controls and ensure that the risk remains in balance with the benefits.

• Supervise and Evaluate: Note any changes to the operation, equipment, environment, 

and/or people and how they may affect your plan. It is important to remember that risk 

management is a continuous process! Adjust to changes in the situation in real time by 

remaining vigilant and maintaining your situation awareness to identify unexpected as 

well as planned threats. Track your progress by taking note of intermediate 

accomplishments that will denote and add up to the completion of your objective. 

Additionally, after action reviews are a good way to assure that the supervision and 

monitoring of the mission are effective and that lessons learned are captured for the 
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

62

future.

Risk Assessment Tools: As discussed previously, the second step of risk management is 

assessment of the threats/hazards. There are several tools that may be used to document the 

risk involved in the operation. A good source for a variety of risk assessment tools can be found 

in the NSHO Chapter 3: and https://www.nifc.gov/about-us/our-partners/blm/aviation/safety

4.5 Assurance

The safety assurance component involves processes for quality control, mishap investigation, 

and program reviews. Assurance emphasizes:

• Continuous monitoring and evaluation

• Standards for evaluations

• Internal/external audits and evaluations

• Investigations

• Emergency preparedness and response

• Reporting and feedback

Quality assurance (QA) techniques can be used to provide a structured process for achieving 

objectives. Currently BLM efforts have shifted with more emphasis being placed on the 

assurance pillar which consists of annual review of BLM contracted aviation resources during the 

field season.

4.5.1.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: SAFECOM

Personnel at all levels are encouraged to promote a positive safety culture through reporting 

hazards and mishaps. SAFECOMs may be submitted by any individual who witnesses or has 

specific knowledge of an event. Although retaining anonymity is an option when submitting a 

SAFECOM, it is highly recommended that employees engage in discussions with the UAM/UAO or 

SAM when submitting the report and provide a method of being contacted in case further questions 

arise. Although not required, the most effective learning SAFECOMs are often jointly written by the 

government employee and the involved pilot or mechanic so that technical facts can be articulated 

correctly.

An employee, i.e., a new UAM/UAO, who needs to review and edit SAFECOMs in the system 

should submit an access request form to the SAM who will sign and forward it to the BLM National 

Aviation Safety and Training Program Manager.

The UAO should provide a corrective action statement on a SAFECOM generated on their Unit 

during a flight or mission where the BLM has operational control. The SAM will review and initiate 

follow-up discussions with the UAO if needed and may write additional corrective action language 

before the final submission of the document. When a BLM contract aircraft or BLM employees are 

involved in another agency’s event that generates a SAFECOM, the SAM is available to engage in 

learning discussions with the Cooperator agency and may request and retain a copy of the 

SAFECOM on file.

4.5.1.2 District Supplement:

4.5.1 Aviation Safety and Technical Assistance Team (ASTAT)

During high levels of aviation activity, it is advisable to request an Aviation Safety and Technical 

Assistance Team (ASTAT). An ASTAT’s purpose is to enhance risk management, efficiency, 

effectiveness and provide technical assistance while reviewing aviation operations. If an ASTAT 

cannot be filled internally, the request may be placed with NICC through established ordering 

channels using individual overhead requests. An ASTAT should operate under a Delegation of 

Authority from the appropriate State/Regional Aviation Manager(s) or Multi Agency Coordinating 
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

63

Group. Formal written reports shall be provided to appropriate manager(s) as outlined at the inbrief. A team should be developed to fit the need of the requesting unit and may consist of the 

following:

• Aviation Safety Manager.

• Operations Specialist (helicopter and/or fixed wing).

• Pilot Inspector.

• Maintenance Inspector (optional).

• Avionics Inspector (optional).

• Aircraft Dispatcher (optional).

4.5.2 Aviation Safety Communiqué - SAFECOM

The SAFECOM system is used to report any condition, observance, act, maintenance problem 

or circumstance which has the potential to cause an aviation-related mishap. The SAFECOM 

system is not intended for initiating punitive actions. Mission personnel are encouraged to 

collaborate on SAFECOM development prior to submission to avoid any punitive implication, 

submission duplication and to increase the narrative accuracy of events. Submitting a 

SAFECOM is not a substitute for “on-the-spot” correction(s) to a safety concern. It is a tool used 

to identify, document, track, and correct safety related issues. All personnel involved in aviation 

activities are encouraged to submit SAFECOMs. A SAFECOM can be submitted via:

• Website: https://www.safecom.gov/

• Mobile application: https://www.safecom.gov/mobile/#/

• Phone: 1-888-464-7427

Personnel in doubt about completing a SAFECOM should contact their UAM. Reference the BLM 

NAP Appendix 4 for BLM SAFECOM management roles.

• Elevated SAFECOM’s will not be made “Public” until a determination/ investigation has 

been completed. The National Aviation Safety Manager (FA-500) will assign a liaison to 

OAS-Safety on a case–by-case basis.

4.5.3 Program Evaluations, Readiness Reviews, Site Visits

Aviation program evaluations/reviews are an integral part of the System Safety Assurance 

program.

BLM aviation program reviews are conducted at two levels within the department to ensure that 

safety standards, policy compliance and Bureau efficiency objectives are being met.

BLM Fire Preparedness Reviews: Aviation functional operations and facilities are reviewed as 

part of the total Fire Preparedness review of field/district operations. Reviews are conducted 

every four years by a national level review team. District or state level fire readiness reviews are 

conducted annually. The SAM will be responsible for coordinating annual readiness reviews of 

the state’s aviation crews/personnel, project, and base site visits, and developing guidelines for 

UAM oversight of district/field office aviation activities. The SAM has the responsibility to ensure 

the reviews are being conducted for aviation operations within the required time frame and to 

identify well qualified individuals to conduct the review (reference

Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations, Chapter 18 for information).

OAS Aviation Program Evaluation: OAS will administer an aviation program evaluation of each 

BLM state and the NAO every five years. The purpose of these evaluations is primarily to review 

non-fire aviation activities as they relate to administration, operations, safety, training, and 

security. The NAO will identify qualified individuals to assist with the review (reference BLM NAP 

Appendix 5 for schedule). The SAM will assist with the review and provide scheduling and 

logistical support. Additional reviews may be conducted if a need is identified by the aviation 

division chief.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

64

4.5.4 National Fire and Aviation Operations Alert System

The BLM Office of Fire and Aviation has established an “Operation Alert” system designed to

provide field units and personnel with critical ground or aerial operational information in a timely 

manner. The system is intended to respond to emerging issues as identified through such means 

as SAFECOMS, SAFENETS, investigation reports, after action reviews, etc. This system is not a 

replacement for any existing formal notification and alert system such as Interagency Safety 

Alerts or Aviation Accident Prevention Bulletin. In fact, the intent is for the operations alerts to 

complement these existing systems in those instances where it is appropriate. These alerts will 

also complement the Department and Bureau manual process. The operations alert system will 

provide time sensitive information to state and unit FMOs and aviation managers. It is anticipated 

that these individuals will provide the information to appropriate parties through established 

channels and processes. The Office of Fire and Aviation, Operations (FA-300) and Aviation (FA500) groups manage the program.

4.5.5 Promotion

The BLM must promote safety as a core value with practices that support a positive safety 

culture. BLM Aviation Managers are encouraged to promote aviation safety and accident 

prevention at every opportunity, within all fire and non-fire programs. Line Managers play a 

critical role in establishing a just safety culture at the State and Field levels. Safety promotion can 

be accomplished through:

• Training

• Communication

• Reporting and Feedback

• Safety and Mishap Information

• Safety Awards

4.5.6 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Safety Promotion

The BLM OR/WA SAM and UAOs promote aviation safety through frequent interaction and 

briefings, AARs, and SAFECOM reviews with line officers, other state, and regional office staff, the 

PNWCG Aviation Working Committee, district FMOs, and through the measures listed in Section

4.2 above. The UAOs are responsible for local safety promotion and quality assurance through:

• Preparing and reviewing PASP/MASPs and risk assessments for non-fire projects.

• Updating the Unit Aviation Plan annually with attention to accuracy, completeness, and 

detail, submitting it for signature within required timeframes.

• Providing aviation training on the local Unit, monitoring the IAT training records for non-fire 

district employees to ensure those who fly on aviation missions are current and qualified as 

Aircrew and/or Flight Manager.

• Presenting, attending, or ensuring a qualified flight manager conducts pre-mission briefings 

and AARs with an emphasis on reviewing the PASP/MASP and risk assessment.

• Providing corrective action statements for SAFECOMs submitted on the local Unit during 

missions in which the Bureau has operational control. Briefing the SAM and local fire 

managers/supervisors when events occur, or trends are identified.

• Disseminating Safety Alerts, Accident Prevention Bulletins, Lessons Learned reports, and

other safety-related information, and/or maintaining a display board of these products as 

they are received from the SAM and other sources.

• Requesting and/or preparing/presenting aviation safety awards for extraordinary proactive 

measures that are likely to have prevented a mishap, or to reward an exceptional action 

taken for accident prevention.

4.5.7 District Supplement:
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

65

4.6.1 Lessons Learned

National and State level aviation program managers are responsible for providing input into

training curriculum development, lessons learned messages, development of new procedures 

and operational methodologies.

SAMs are responsible for disseminating pertinent aviation safety information and actively 

engaging resource and fire managers during annual work plan development.

Additional information regarding Lessons Learned is available at the Lessons Learned website: 

http://www.wildfirelessons.net/Home

4.6.2 Aviation Safety Awards Program

Aviation safety awards are a positive part of the aviation program and are provided to all 

organization levels. National awards are given following the guidelines in 352 DM 4 for pilots and 

employees. Airward recommendation narratives are submitted through the SAM to the NAO 

Safety and Training Advisor.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

66

5.0 Aviation Operations

5.1 General

As a Bureau, we are often challenged with working in high-risk and dynamic environments that 

are not always predictable. It is the responsibility of each employee, cooperator, and contractor to 

conduct aviation operations that have been planned properly, approved by management, that 

utilize the correct equipment and personnel and are carefully executed per SOP to minimize risk. 

Safety is the priority and leadership at all levels must foster a culture that encourages 

employees to communicate unsafe conditions, policies or acts that could lead to accidents 

without fear of reprisal. The four components of SMS (policy, risk management, assurance, and 

promotion) are critical to the success of safe operations.

State and local units are required to staff exclusive use aircraft assigned to their jurisdiction 

throughout the contract period and any extensions. Additionally, local units will ensure that 

support functions (i.e., airtanker bases and local dispatch centers) necessary for the mobilization 

of national assets (i.e., large airtankers, Lead planes, SEATs, ASMs and fire helicopters) are 

staffed to support local dispatch as well as GACC to GACC and national mobilization.

5.1.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: General

The BLM OR/WA conducts a wide range of fire and non-fire aviation missions each year in support 

of fire and resource management programs. It is imperative that managers and supervisors pay 

close attention to the work and flight environments due to the complex and dynamic nature of each. 

Successful and safe operations depend on effective mission planning, open communication, 

adherence to policies and established procedures, maintaining situational awareness, and a 

continuous focus on sound risk management principles and practices.

The BLM State Office is committed to the success of interagency programs and partnerships with 

the USFS PNW & Alaska. Seven of the nine BLM districts in OR/WA have interagency and/or 

Service First fire programs with a UAM (or UAO) who provides service to more than one agency per 

written letter(s) of delegation from line officers. The BLM provides staffing for tactical aircraft and 

operates several base facilities that support both interagency and stand-alone Bureau aviation 

programs and operations. There is also significant Bureau and interagency use of the cooperator 

aircraft listed in Section 3.11 above throughout the Northwest on any given year. The following is a 

basic list of aviation program components in the districts of BLM OR/WA. Additional information 

about the BLM EU aircraft contracts and helitack operations are found in Section 5.22 below.

Vale District:

• Stand-alone, USFS permanent full-time (PFT) BLM UAM, shared with and based in Burns

• One PFT Assistant UAM/Air Attack (ATGS).

• One EU 90-day contract, Type 3 helicopter, a PFT Helicopter Manager/crew supervisor and 

assistant manager, and 9-person helitack fire crew, based at government-owned facility at 

Vale- Miller Memorial Airport (S49). The crew is trained and equipped to perform aerial 

ignition.

• One EU 90-day contract, Aero Commander 690B fixed-wing twin-engine air tactical airplane 

based at Ontario Airport (ONO), with a qualified BLM Air Tactical Group Supervisor (ATGS) 

assigned. The ATGS also functions as the Assistant UAM.

• One bulk retardant contract (LC-95A) with a 10,000-gallon capacity retardant storage tank and 

mix tank, water supplied by hydrant. Base is capable of operating multiple SEATs procured 

on national- level EU or on-call contracts.

Burns District:

• Stand-alone PFT BLM UAM, shared with Vale District with the duty location in Burns.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

67

• On-Call helicopter contracted budgeted for 110-days, A-Star B3E (Type 3) staffed by a 10- 

person helitack fire crew, based at a government-leased facility at Burns Airport (BNO). 

Crew is supervised by a permanent full-time helicopter manager/crew supervisor and an 

assistant crew supervisor. The helitack crew is trained, certified to perform aerial ignition.

• During severity conditions, one or more supplemental contract aircraft (fixed wing or rotor 

wing) are prepositioned to augment existing initial attack capability.

• One bulk retardant contract (LC-95A) with a 10,000-gallon capacity retardant storage tank 

and mix tank on leased ramp space, and water supplied from a storage tank. The base can 

operate three SEATs simultaneously.

Lakeview District (South Central Oregon Fire Management Program):

• Stand-alone PFT USFS Unit Aviation Officer (shared with BLM Lakeview District, and US Fish 

and Wildlife Service, Sheldon-Hart National Wildlife Refuge) per an interagency Service-First 

agreement and delegation.

• One EU 110-day contract, Bell 205A-1++ Type 2 helicopter, 17-20-person interagency 

helitack fire crew, based at government-owned facility on leased property at Lakeview 

Airport (LKV). Crew is supervised by a permanent full-time helicopter manager/crew 

supervisor and an assistant manager. The flight crew and helitack crew are trained, certified, 

and capable of performing aerial ignition.

• Any of the national EU or DOI on-call contract SEATs may be based at LKV where there is a 

government-owned trailer on leased airport property. There is an 8,000-gallon LC retardant 

tank and a 10,000-gallon water tank supplied from a hydrant. The base is normally staffed

by a permanent SEAT Base Manager/Unit Training Officer.

Prineville District (Central Oregon Fire Management):

• Stand-alone permanent full-time USFS Unit Aviation Officer (shared with Prineville District of 

BLM, and Deschutes and Ochoco National Forest), per an interagency Service-First 

agreement and line officer letters of delegation. There is a permanent full-time Assistant 

UAO/Air Tactical Group Supervisor staffing a USFS contract fixed wing aircraft during fire 

season.

Spokane District:

• FMO Collateral duty UAM.

• No permanent bases or assigned EU contracts.

Westside BLM districts (West side of the Oregon Cascade Range include Salem, Eugene 

(which combined to form the Northwest Oregon District in 2016), Coos Bay, Medford, and 

Roseburg.

 These districts are under a BLM fire suppression agreement with the Oregon Department of 

Forestry. Most of the aerial firefighting in western Oregon is performed and directed by the 

state and their resources. In these districts, there are no EU DOI aircraft contracts in place, 

and only occasions when “On-Call” aircraft are procured for Bureau use, mostly non-fire 

resource management projects.

5.1.2 District Supplement: Local Unit Aviation Operations

5.2 Policy, Operational Guides and Handbooks

A list of all the BLM aviation policy documents can be found in the BLM 9400 Manual and BLM NAP 

1.6.

5.3 Public/Civil Aircraft Operations

DOI aviation activities include both “civil” and “public” operations. Civil aircraft operations must
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

68

comply with 14 CFR (Federal Aviation Regulations) in the operation and maintenance of public 

aircraft with the few exceptions outlined in DM 350-353. Operators under contract to DOI are 

bound by that contract to conduct operations in accordance with their FAA-approved commercial 

operator or airline certificate specifications, unless otherwise authorized by the contracting 

officer.

Standard Flight and Duty Limitations (Reference Redbook Chapter 16 for Interim Duty 

Limitations): Interagency standards for pilot duty days and flight time are:

• 14-hour maximum duty day.

• 8 hours maximum daily flight time for mission flights.

• 10 hours for point-to-point, with a 2-pilot crew.

• A maximum of 42 hours flight time during any consecutive 6-day period. When a pilot 

acquires 36 or more flight hours in a consecutive 6-day period, the pilot shall be given 

the following day off. A new 6-day cycle shall begin upon return from any day off.

• Minimum of 10 hours uninterrupted time off (rest) between duty periods; and

• Two days off within any 14-day period.

If these standards are exceeded, the following time off requirements will be followed.

• 11 consecutive hours of rest if the duty day or flight time limitations are exceeded by not 

more than 30 minutes.

• 12 consecutive hours of rest if the duty day or flight time limitations are exceeded by 

more than 30 minutes, but not more than 60 minutes.

• 16 consecutive hours of rest if the duty day or flight time limitations are exceeded by 

more than 60 minutes.

There will be no impact to the contractor’s daily availability for these additional time-off 

requirements. Notification through the contracting chain of command shall occur and a 

SAFECOM should be submitted.

Maintenance Test and Ferry Flights by Government Pilots on contracted aircraft: 

Government Pilots may perform functional maintenance check-flights and ferry aircraft to and 

from the Contractor’s maintenance facilities when it is in the best interest of the Government and 

the following conditions are met:

• Flights are not being paid for by the Government and the operational control remains with 

the Contractor.

• The test flight does not follow any installation, overhaul, major repair, or replacement of 

any engine, propeller, or flight control system.

• The aircraft is operating under an approved and current OAS Inspection.

• Notification and approval from OAS and the NAO.

5.4 BLM Employees on Non-BLM Aircraft

All agency employees will comply with Bureau and DOI aviation policies when performing 

agency employment-related duties on board any organization’s aircraft and/or aircraft operated 

under any other organization’s operational control. These policies include but are not limited to

approved aircraft and pilot (by carding or cooperator letter of approval), project aviation safety 

plans, flight following, PPE, appropriate flight management, etc. (reference 351 DM 4).

Exceptions are:

• Flights in foreign countries (351 DM 4.1.E.(4)), (350 DM 1.2.C). Parts 350 - 354 of the DM 

do not apply to international DOI operations (except for fleet operations). However, BLM 

employees are expected to use good judgment and should attempt to follow DOI aviation 

policies to the extent practical.

• Undercover Law Enforcement missions (351 DM 1.6.D).
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

69

• Flights with a scheduled air carrier on a seat fare basis (Part 121 or 135 scheduled flights 

open to the public on a ticket sale basis). Seat fare is defined as the cost for a DOI 

employee to occupy one seat between two different airports/heliports when the aircraft is

not under the exclusive control of the DOI. It does not include any charter or on- demand 

operation (353 DM 1 & OPM-15)

5.5 Passengers

A passenger is any person aboard an aircraft, when traveling on official BLM business, who does 

not perform the function of a flight crewmember or Aircrew member. Unauthorized passengers 

will not be transported in any DOI aircraft. For official, unofficial, and unauthorized definitions, 

reference 350 DM 1.8.

All passengers will:

• Use appropriate personal protective equipment (reference ALSE Handbook).

• Report aviation incidents, operations deviating from policy to the UAM and/or through the 

SAFECOM system.

• Emphasize personal safety as well as the safety of others involved in the flight.

• Meet the requirements of DOI OPM-04.

Agency employees in off duty status: Federal employees cannot utilize annual leave/LWOP 

or “volunteer” to circumvent agency policy. If any aspect of the employee’s activity is related to 

their official duties, they are conducting agency business, irrespective of their pay status.

Reference the regulations regarding off-duty activities in accordance with the Standards of 

Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch (5 CFR. Part 2635.802-803).

Non-Federal passengers (not covered by established agreements): (reference 350 DM

1.8.A(3)) 

• General: A qualified Helicopter Manager or Flight Manager must be assigned to the 

mission. All requirements regarding use of personal protective equipment, flight following, 

load calculations, and hazard analysis must be followed.

• Resource/Project Missions: If the mission is special use, a Project Aviation Safety Plan is 

required and must be approved by line management prior to the flight. It must show that 

the carriage of Non-Federal passengers aboard the aircraft is of an official nature and is 

advantageous to the agency. Since the Non-Federal passengers are designated official 

passengers, no flight release waiver is necessary

• Incident Missions: As a rule, the Incident Commander on Type I or II Incident 

Management Teams may authorize all flights with Non-Federal passengers on board. On 

local unit fires, the line manager or their designee is usually the approving authority. 

Flights on government aircraft with Non-Federal passengers aboard must be in the 

interest of the government. No flight release waiver is required. This general guidance 

may be further restricted by agency local unit policy. The air operations staff should check 

with the local area to ascertain any additional restrictions or necessary approvals.

• Restricted Category Helicopters: Carriage of passengers aboard restricted category 

aircraft is specifically prohibited.

• Local Unit Aviation Manager and State Aviation Manager shall be notified prior to any 

flights with Non-Federal passengers aboard.

Volunteers: Volunteers when traveling on official business, are official passengers, within the 

terms of 350 DM 1.8.A.(3) and BLM 9400.67.A. Volunteers are not permitted to operate aircraft 

or serve as an aircrew member on any DOI aircraft. Volunteers aboard DOI aircraft performing 

mission flights must be pre-approved by the appropriate BLM line manager. During fire mission
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

70

flights, the incident commander with delegation of authority or the local line officer are the 

appropriate levels of approval. OMB 0596-0080 requires use of Volunteer Service Agreement 

form OF301a. 

5.6 Emergency Exception to Policy:

Federal employees who are involved in an event in which there clearly exists an imminent threat 

to human life, and when there is insufficient time to utilize approved methods, may deviate from 

policy to the extent necessary to preserve life (reference 350 DM 1.3.B). The following provisions 

and follow-up actions apply:

• Personnel involved are expected to use good judgment.

• Personnel involved in the decision-making associated with deviating from policy must 

weigh the risks verses benefit.

• Any deviations must be documented on a SAFECOM.

5.7 Categories of Flight

The following terminology is used throughout this section under these definitions.

A “Point-to-Point” flight is one that originates at one FAA-designated airport, seaplane base or 

permanent helibase (identified in the FAA Airport/Facilities Directory, FAA Sectional Aeronautical 

Charts or FAA supplement for the geographic area) and flies directly to another developed 

airport, seaplane base or permanent helibase with the sole purpose of transporting personnel or 

cargo (this term does not apply to flights with a scheduled air carrier on a seat fare basis). These 

types of flights are often referred to as “administrative” flights and require the aircraft and pilot to 

be only carded and approved for point-to-point flight. A point-to-point flight is conducted higher 

than 500 feet above ground level (AGL). Point-to-point missions, when flown in Department 

owned or contracted aircraft, shall be considered civil aircraft operations and must be flown in full 

compliance with applicable provisions of 14 CFR.

“Special Use Activities” Special Use Activities involve the utilization of airplanes and 

helicopters in flight operations which do not meet the definition of point-to-point flight (see 350 

DM 1), and which require special considerations due to additional equipment and/or the 

increased complexity inherent in such operations. Point-to-point missions, when flown in 

Department owned or contracted aircraft, shall be considered civil aircraft operations and must 

be flown in full compliance with the applicable provisions of 14 CFR. Regardless of any status as 

a public aircraft, pilots must comply with the applicable provisions of 14 CFR and deviate only as 

authorized by published Department policy. OPM-29 Special Use Activities for Manned Aircraft

5.8 Flight Planning

Unless exempted by 351 DM 1.4, all flights will be conducted with an approved flight plan. (See 

also National Interagency Mobilization Guide Chapter 20)

Point-to-Point Flights will be tracked by a FAA - visual flight rules (VFR) or instrument flight 

rules (IFR) flight plan or on an international Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) flight plan; or in 

accordance with a Bureau approved flight plan program; or in accordance with an OAS Director 

approved vendor flight program specified in a DOI procurement document. FAA flight plans may 

be supplemented by agency flight plans and the administrative tracking and notification 

procedures specified in the National and Geographic Area Mobilization Guides. A qualified flight 

manager (per OPM-04) will be assigned to perform the administrative functions and assure a 

briefing is given to the pilot and a pre-flight safety briefing is given to the passengers (reference 

National Interagency Mobilization Guide Chapter 20 for specific responsibilities). A 9400-1a Form 

or other Aircraft Flight Strip (per Dispatch SOP) will be utilized to provide dispatch with the 

appropriate aircraft and pilot information, a passenger manifest, and an estimated time of 

departure and arrival.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

71

Special Use Activities: Agency flight plans for fire/emergency mission flights will be documented 

on the Aircraft Flight Strip (per Dispatch SOP) and/or Resource Order. Agency flight plans for nonfire/non-emergency mission flights will be documented on the 9400-1a Flight Request/Schedule or 

equivalent Aircraft Flight Strip (per Dispatch SOP) and/or PASP. The flight manager and the pilot 

will plan the mission together. Approval to conduct non-fire/non- emergency mission flights is 

required prior to flight (see NAP 4.3.2). Elements to be considered are:

• Type of mission

• Environmental conditions – departure point, route, destination

• Time frames

• Logistics – fuel, landing areas, equipment, support crew

• Communications

• Airspace, flight hazards

• Aircraft and/or Pilot carding requirements (i.e., ACETA, Low-Level, etc. reference OPM29)

5.8.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Flight Planning and Mobilization

Proper tracking of tactical aircraft requires either a resource order or an agency flight plan (i.e.,

Form 9400-1a or a Mission Planning Worksheet) for all flights in the PNW. Flight managers will 

notify dispatch of departure and arrival times, any necessary deviations from the planned flight 

route or timeframes, and upon arrival at any intermediate stops and the destination. If there are 

unique or specific local procedures on how the flight planning and approval process is managed on 

the local Unit, those details may be addressed in the unit aviation plan or the Dispatch Center

Operating Plan. A PASP/MASP is required for non-fire mission flights in OR/WA with few 

exceptions, as discussed in Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2. Non-Fire include prescribe fire missions 

unless that which has escaped and requires full suppression.

5.8.2 District Supplement:

5.9 Flight Following

(See also National Interagency Mobilization Guide Chapter 50 and Interagency Standards for Fire

and Fire Aviation Operations Chapter 16)

Sterile Cockpit All Aircraft: Sterile cockpit rules apply within a 5-mile radius of the airport. The 

flight crew will perform no radio or cockpit communication during that time that is not directly related 

to safe flight of the aircraft from taxi to 5 miles out and from 5 miles out until clearing the active 

runway. This would consist of reading checklists, communication with Air Traffic Control (ATC), 

Flight Service Stations, Unicom, or other aircraft with the intent of ensuring separation or complying 

with ATC requirements. Communications by passengers or air crew members can be accomplished 

when the audio panels can be isolated and do not interfere with flight operations of the flight crew.

Exception: When conducting firefighting missions within 5 miles of an uncontrolled airport, maintain 

sterile cockpit until departing the traffic pattern and reaching final altitude. Monitor CTAF frequency if 

feasible while engaged in firefighting activities. Monitor CTAF as soon as practical upon leaving the 

fire and returning to the uncontrolled airport. When conducting firefighting missions within Class B, 

C, or D airspace, notify dispatch that ATC communications will have priority over dispatch 

communications.

Point-to-Point Flight following is accomplished by an authorized flight plan as outlined in NAP

5.8. Aircraft on FAA IFR flight plans are continuously tracked via radar. Radar tracking for VFR 

traffic is not guaranteed, but is available when requested if the controller workload, terrain, and 

operating altitude allow coverage. The designated flight manager will confirm that the pilot has filed 

and activated an authorized flight plan and performs several functions associated with the agency 

flight plan. When utilizing an FAA VFR flight plan or agency flight plan, the pilot or flight manager will
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

72

notify Dispatch upon departure, arrival at any interim stops, and arrival at the destination to close

out resource tracking. The flight following method is documented on the Flight Strip or 9400- 1a

Form.

Mission Flight Following is accomplished by flight crews and agency dispatchers using positive 

two-way communication (agency radio systems, satellite telephones, satellite texting), via the 

internet-based Automated Flight Following (AFF) system, or by agency personnel on the scene of 

an incident or project where the aircraft is operating.

The method of flight following for fire incidents is documented on an aircraft resource order or in a 

Dispatch Center’s Mobilization/Operating Guide. The method for flight following non-fire missions 

will be documented in a PASP and/or 9400-1a (or equivalent).

Agency Flight Following begins with providing the departure time, souls on board (total personnel 

on the aircraft), quantity/duration of fuel, and heading to next check-in point. Position reports during 

a mission normally include the aircraft call sign, latitude, longitude, and heading. The default 

standard check-in for flight following is 15 minutes. If this is not possible, reporting frequency must 

be established and briefed prior to the mission and position reporting shall not exceed one-hour

intervals under normal circumstances (reference 351 DM 1.4.B). If the 15 minute time limitation is to 

be exceeded, prior approval by the SAM is required (reference 9400.45.C.2.a).

• In certain circumstances, a position report may be given by some other descriptive 

location, such as reference to a mission grid-square map, a prominent known landmark, 

etc.

• Flight following may be conducted by FAA air traffic control if the mission flight is 

operating within Class B, C, or D airspace, and with prior notification to dispatch.

• Position reports and tactical radio transmissions should not be given when operating 

within five miles of an airport in the “sterile cockpit” environment.

The BLM standard format for aviation operations is Degrees and Decimal Minutes (DDD o 

MM.MMM’). Reference BLM NAP Appendix 3 for additional details. Utilization of the correct 

format must be discussed between dispatch and the flight crew to assure accurate navigation.

Local/on-scene Flight Following: Local flight following by incident or project personnel may be 

implemented and utilized only when certain requirements are met and in place (reference 

NSHO Chapter 4. Page 29 line 28.):

• Local flight follow procedures pre-identified and approved in the 9400-1a or PASP for 

project operations and in conjunction with Dispatch for tactical operations.

• Flight following procedures and responsibilities have been addressed in pre-flight 

briefings.

• Methods of flight following are in place and tested, including mandatory communication 

between designated flight following personnel and dispatch before flight operations begin. 

Positive communication with Dispatch must be maintained continuously during the 

operational period.

• A positive, clean “hand-off” must occur between dispatch and the project site when local 

flight following begins and ends.

• Backup/alternate communication devices are in place, available and tested.

• A reporting interval not to exceed fifteen minutes (or continuous visual contact) is 

maintained, and the location/status documented on a field radio log.

• Emergency accident and lost communication procedures must be briefed and understood 

by project flight following personnel, the pilot, flight manager, and dispatch.

Automated Flight Following (AFF): AFF is the preferred method of agency flight following by 

Dispatch Centers since the aircraft N-number/identifier, position, speed, and heading of each AFFequipped aircraft is graphically depicted every two minutes. The ability to resume radio flight
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

73

following will be maintained and utilized in the event the AFF system ceases to function (i.e., agency 

network internet connection failure or aircraft AFF transmitter failure). Reference the National 

Interagency Mobilization Guide, Chapter 50 for specific direction regarding AFF.

5.9.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Flight Following

If there are supplemental methods or additional procedures for flight following on an individual Unit, 

those should be addressed in the District/Unit Aviation Plan. It is recommended that the aviation 

portion of a Dispatch Center Operating Plan be included as an appendix or at least referenced in a 

Unit Aviation Plan to address this topic.

5.10 Radio Frequency Management/Communications

Bureau of Land Management policies for radio communications are found in Manual 

Sections:MS-1291 Radio Frequency Authorization Manual, and MS-1292 Radio

Communications.

Do not transmit on a frequency without formal approval from the authorized radio frequency 

management personnel at the local, state, regional or national levels.

5.11 Overdue, Missing or Downed Aircraft

An aircraft is considered “overdue” when it fails to arrive within 30 minutes past the estimated time of 

arrival (ETA) and cannot be located. An aircraft is considered “missing” when its fuel duration has 

been exceeded, it has been reported as “overdue” to the FAA and the FAA has

completed an administrative search for the aircraft without success. If an aircraft is overdue, 

missing, or downed, initiate the Interagency Aviation Mishap Response Guide and Checklist (NFES 

2659). It is critical that the response plan is implemented, followed, and documented throughout the 

duration of the event.

5.11.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Frequency management/communications

Frequency management/communications aviation frequencies are issued and controlled in the

PNW by and for USFS, BLM, and interagency partners in accordance with FSH 6609.14 and DOI 

policies. The Pacific Northwest Unit Aviation Officers’ Working Group gathers frequency

information and publishes the annual Pacific Northwest Aviation Frequency Guide in a spiralbound pocket-sized format. Each district or forest (unit) has a designated point of contact who is

required to submit changes or updates for the Frequency Guide by March 1 of each year. The 

UAOs and the PNWCG Aviation Committee are available to provide interagency coordination and 

support for frequency-related issues between fire operations personnel, agency radio program 

managers/technicians, and dispatch centers.

National Flight Following (NFF) and Air Guard frequencies: Dispatch Center radio consoles and 

aircraft radios are required to be capable of monitoring and transmitting on the emergency Air Guard 

and NFF frequencies.

Air Guard is generally reserved for transmitting aircraft emergencies, however the PNW (Oregon 

and Washington) current permits utilization of this frequency for the purpose of aerial medevac 

operation. This is a permitted work-around if the newly assigned VMED-29 frequency isn’t viable. 

The VMED -29 was recently established under an interagency MOU with the State Medical 

agencies to be utilize in Oregon, Washington, and Idaho. This will help facilitate communication with 

air medical life flight operators. Dispatch Centers and pilots are always required to monitor Air Guard 

during flight operations.

5.11.2 District Supplement:
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

74

5.12 Mishap Response

The Interagency Aviation Mishap Response Guide and Checklist outlines appropriate response to a 

loss of flight following, or an aircraft incident or accident. The plan describes procedures and 

requirements, including initiation of SAR, fire and medical response, notification of OAS

Safety (1-888-4MISHAP) and BLM management. This guide (or equivalent) is specific to each Unit 

and shall be available in all Dispatch Offices (reference 352 DM 3.5). The guide must be updated 

annually by the date established in the state aviation plan. Dispatch Centers are encouraged to 

augment the Interagency Aviation Mishap Response Guide and Checklist with additional local 

protocols and notification procedures and are required to test the Plan at least annually through a 

simulation exercise.

• Timely upward reporting of any confirmed or potential accident or incident is critical. If 

there is any doubt on how any occurrence might be classified contact your: State Aviation 

Manager, National Aviation Safety Advisor or the National Division Chief, Aviation (in that 

order) for clarification.

The Interagency Aviation Mishap Response Guide and Checklist is available at: 

https://www.doi.gov/aviation/library

5.12.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Mishap Response

Dispatch centers in Washington and Oregon are required to have their Aviation Mishap Response Plans 

updated annually by May 1st or prior to any flight operations. The plan shall be tested with one or more 

simulation exercises known as an Aviation Incident Response Exercise (AIRE) annually prior to the start of 

fire season. Units are encouraged to take opportunities for an outside AIRE simulation team to help the unit 

with assess or more extensive exercises. Contact SAM for more assistance.

Multiple simulations and drills are recommended to ensure all dispatchers who will be mobilizing, and 

tracking aircraft are proficient with initiating an effective response and proper notifications. It is critical to 

ensure that phone contact lists are current and accurate. The UAOWG has created a canned curriculum for 

AIRE training that is available for local use. Please reach out to the SAM, RAO or UAOWG member for 

more information. An Information Memo (IM) from the State Office may be issued that provides more 

direction and clarification annually.

5.12.2 District Supplement: (Insert local unit mishap response procedures or consider posting local unit 

mishap response plan in DAP Appendix.)

5.13 Transportation of Hazardous Materials

Transportation of hazardous materials aboard agency contracted aircraft must meet the 

requirements set forth in the NWCG Standards for Aviation Transport of Hazardous Materials.

Transport of hazardous materials aboard commercial aircraft must be in accordance with that 

company’s policy.

5.13.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Transportation of Hazardous Materials

The most current DOT 9198 letter of Exemption and the current edition of the Interagency Aviation 

Transport of Hazardous Materials Guide must be carried on board any aircraft under BLM 

operational control when hazardous materials are being transported.

The pilot and any employees who are involved with packaging, transporting, or carrying such 

materials on any flight must have completed the required IAT A-110 course within the past three

years per OPM-4 and the IAT Guide. The course length is two hours, and it may be completed as 

on-line computer-based training, or in a classroom setting. (See Chapter 6-Aviation Training for 

more details).

5.14 Invasive Species Control
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

75

Aquatic invasive species are easily transported in a variety of ways (i.e., helicopter buckets, 

scoopers, fixed tank helicopters and SEATs utilizing open water sources, fire engines and water 

tenders, and other water handling equipment). Agency personnel should become knowledgeable 

in the preventive measures associated with mitigating the spread of aquatic plants and 

invertebrates. Aviation managers should consult with local unit resource advisors to acquire 

information associated with contaminated water sources, approved water sources, cleaning of 

equipment exposed to contaminated water requirements, and other pertinent information.

Work is underway to develop additional guidance and procedures in the cleaning of equipment 

that has been exposed to aquatic invasive. Additional operational guidelines for aquatic invasive 

species can be found in the Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations,

Chapter 12 and Guide to Preventing Aquatic Invasive Species Transport by Wildland Fire

Operations

5.15 Fire Chemicals, Aerial Application Policy Near Waterways

Interagency policy only allows the use of a product that is qualified and approved for intended 

use. A qualified products list (QPL) is published for each wildland fire chemical type and 

maintained on the Wildland Fire Chemical Systems (WFCS) web site.

Products must be blended or mixed at the proper ratio by approved methods prior to being 

loaded into the aircraft by authorized personnel, Long-Term Fire Retardant Characteristics and

Mix Factors.

Personnel involved in handling, mixing and applying fire chemicals or solutions shall be trained in 

proper safe handling procedures and use the personal protective equipment recommended on 

the product label and safety data sheet (SDS).

For operational guidelines on use of fire chemicals and the Policy for Delivery of Wildland Fire 

Chemicals near Waterways, reference the Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation

Operations, Chapter 12.

5.15.1.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement:

It is highly recommended that all districts are familiar and follow the guidance in the NAP 5.14 and

5.15 above and complete necessary training and preparedness for retardant avoidance 

areas, misapplication reporting requirements, and a link to a map of avoidance areas.

5.15.1.2 District Supplement

5.15.1 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Planning

Airtanker bases shall have appropriate spill containment measures in place. Bases should refer 

to the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Best Management Practices (BMP’s) 

and procedures for their specific base. Consult with the local hazmat specialist on requirements. 

SWPPPs will need reviewed/updated annually and SWPPP training conducted for 

airtanker/SEAT base personnel.

5.15.2 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Planning

Each permanent SEAT base in Oregon now has an established SWPPP in place and the bases are working

toward if not already in full compliance. Additional these bases are working to correct CACHE findings as 

funds become available.

5.15.3 District Supplement

5.16 Search and Rescue (SAR) (See also BLM NAP 3.14)

Agency line officers, managers or an incident commander may direct agency personnel to 
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

76

participate in SAR aviation missions on or over public lands.

• All personnel involved with SAR operations should remain within the scope of their 

employment.

• Proper planning, risk assessments, and briefing the mission prior to an event will 

significantly reduce risk and improve the odds of success.

• SAR operations could lead to actions in conflict with DOI policy (reference BLM NAP 5.6 

Emergency Exception to Policy).

• DOI policy (900 DM 1.10 and BLM H-1112-1.40.C) and the

Federal Land Policy and Management Act (43.U.S.C. 1742) provide authority to incur 

expenses and to take a temporary lead role in any SAR emergencies in which immediate 

and quick response can save lives.

5.17 Large Airtanker (LAT), and Very Large Airtanker (VLAT) Operations

Airtankers are a national resource, and their primary mission is initial attack. GACCs mobilize 

these aircraft according to National and Geographic Area Mobilization Guides. In addition to 

federally contracted airtankers, military airtankers with the Modular Airborne Fire Fighting System 

(MAFFS) and cooperator aircraft may be utilized to supplement the federal fleet through 

established agreements.

Operational considerations concerning LAT, and VLAT operations can be referenced in the 

NWCG Standards for Aerial Supervision (SAS), and airtanker contract currently hosted by the

USFS. Additional airtanker operations information can be found in the Interagency Standards for 

Fire and Aviation Operations, Chapter 16.

5.17.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Large Airtanker Operations

MAFFS: Klamath Falls, OR and Moses Lake, WA are currently the only air tanker bases approved 

for using MAFFs. Medford and Moses Lake are approved as reload bases for VLATs. Orders for 

MAFFS, VLATs, and other Large Airtankers are placed through NWCC per the procedures found in 

the PNW Mobilization Guide.

Foreign Airtankers: Due to the adjacent proximity of the State of Washington to Canada, there is 

an MOU in place with British Columbia for boundary firefighting operations in the BLM Spokane 

District and on national forests adjacent to the border. The USFS R6 airtanker program manager in 

Redmond meets with and provides training and briefings for Canadian airtanker pilots and aviation 

managers on a regular basis. These aircraft are required to be inspected and approved annually by 

letter as with all cooperator aircraft. This will be coordinated and accomplished through the PNW 

Interagency request process with and through the FS RAO and OAS.

5.17.2 District Supplement:

5.18 Airtanker/SEAT Base Operations

The airtanker/SEAT base manager supervises fixed wing ground and retardant operations in 

accordance with the NWCG Standards for Airtanker Base Operations (SABO). The SABO 

standardizes operations and procedures at interagency airtanker/SEAT bases to ensure safe, 

efficient, and effective operations in support of interagency goals and objectives.

An airtanker/SEAT base manager and required minimum staffing must be identified and in place
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

77

prior to conducting operations.

Airtanker Base Manager (ATBM), SEAT Manager (SEMG) and base support personnel 

responsibilities, training and currency requirements are outlined in the NWCG Standards for 

Wildland Fire Position Qualifications, PMS 310.1.

Airtanker/SEAT base staffing requirements are located within the appendices of the SABO

Staffing levels must consider ramp operations, risk management and 7-day staffing. An 

airtanker/SEAT base may have operational limitations, refer to the appropriate base operations 

plan.

Airtanker/SEAT Bases must develop and annually update their Airtanker Base/SEAT Base) 

Operations Plan (ABOP/SBOP). Additional administrative requirements (examples: FLIGHT/duty 

day logs/inspection) are in the SABO or on the NIFC–SEAT website.

5.19 SEAT Operations

Nationally Funded Preparedness SEATs (EU) as well as National On-Call SEATs are national 

resources. Their primary mission is initial attack. Mobilization is managed by dispatch centers 

with support by a national SEAT Coordinator and aviation managers. The BLM is currently the 

host for the National On-Call SEAT Services Contract.

Operational considerations concerning SEATs can be referenced in the

BLM Nationally Funded SEAT SOP’s, NWCG Standards for Airtanker Base Operations and the 

Standards for Aerial Supervision (SAS). 

5.19.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: SEAT Operations

BLM maintains several SEAT bases that are available to host and/or reload the current fleet of 

national-contract SEATs. These bases, which have water sources and retardant are in Ontario,

Burns, and Lakeview. A brief description of the three primary Oregon BLM SEAT bases is 

provided in Sec. 5.1 above. Additional bases have historically been temporarily established at 

numerous other small airports throughout the Northwest at locations such as Prineville, Troutdale, 

Madras, etc.

Each BLM Unit Aviation Plan that has a SEAT base or reload base on their unit will include a SEAT 

Base Operating Plan as an appendix to the Unit or DAP.

Districts are highly encouraged to share SEAT aircraft and other aerial resources with neighboring 

districts, forests, and other agency lands in accordance with established interagency initial attack 

agreements. Resource sharing is encouraged both within the geographic area as well as across 

GACC boundary lines if aircraft are available. Coordination between the ordering Dispatch Center, 

the National SEAT Coordinator’s desk at the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC), and the 

NWCC is required when additional aircraft are needed but unavailable from a neighboring dispatch 

center.

SEAT missions are occasionally cancelled (i.e., due to a false alarm) after an aircraft has already 

taken off in response to a reported fire. Due to safety and aircraft structural limitations, the aircraft 

cannot return and land with a full load of retardant on board. Therefore, each base shall identify at 

least two acceptable retardant jettison sites away from the airport, any urban area, or developed 

private land. Jettison site locations are generally located on remote public land and should be 

documented in each SEAT base operating plan and known by the local and adjacent dispatch 

center. Agency resource management specialists should be consulted annually to review 

established jettison sites for continued suitability. Jettison areas should be discussed during initial 

pilot briefings, and pilots should enter jettison site locations as waypoints in the aircraft panelmounted GPS as soon as possible when operating from a new or unfamiliar base.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

78

Additionally, all USFS LAT bases can service, support and host SEATS as needed. The PNW 

has an Interagency Airtanker Base Manager Committee that works closely together to assist 

each other in the management of all airtanker type resources.

5.19.2 District Supplement: (Describe Local SEAT program and base facilities-primary and reload bases. 

Attach Unit SEAT base operating plan as appendix to Unit Aviation Plan if applicable.)

5.20 Foreign Airtanker Operations

The National Interagency Mobilization Guide identifies procedures for ordering foreign airtankers. 

Requests for foreign airtankers will be ordered through the GACC and forwarded on to NICC. In 

accordance with 351 DM 2.3.C all airtanker make and models, regardless of nationality, must be 

Interagency Airtanker Board approved. Each aircraft and pilot(s) will be issued Letters of 

Approval per the procedures outlined in 351 DM 4.1 and 351 DM 4.4 and the

National Interagency Mobilization Guide. Operations of foreign airtankers will be consistent with 

the procedures outlined in the SAS.

5.20.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Foreign Airtankers

Due to the adjacent proximity of the State of Washington to Canada, there is an MOU in place with 

British Columbia for boundary firefighting operations. The USFS R6 airtanker program coordinator 

in Redmond meets with and provides training and briefings for Canadian airtanker pilots and 

aviation managers on a regular basis. These aircraft are required to be inspected and approved 

annually by letter as with all cooperator aircraft. This will be coordinated and accomplished through 

the PNW Interagency request process with and through the FS RAO and OAS.

5.20.1 Water Scooper Operations

Scooping operations may be conducted by single engine or multi engine water scoopers. 

Operational considerations can be found in the Standards for Water Scooping Operations and

appropriate water scooper contract. Currently the USFS is the host for the multi engine water 

scooper contract, with the BLM as the host for the National on-call Fire Boss contract.

Local Units and States should incorporate water scooper planning into local unit aviation plans 

and state aviation plans.

Coordination of water scoopers is done at the National, Geographic, State, and local units.

Both multi engine and single engine water scoopers must have an aircraft manager identified. 

SEMGs (or ATBMs) may manage up to 4 aircraft if co-located out of the same location.

5.21 Air Attack, ASM and Lead plane Operations

These air tactical resources conduct operations in accordance with the SAS, and the policies and 

procedures prescribed in the Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations. 

Dispatch and ordering procedures are accomplished in accordance with the Geographic Area 

and National Interagency Mobilization Guide.

The SAS, Aerial Supervision Logbook and associated forms are located on the NWCG website: 

http://www.nwcg.gov/publications

Aerial supervision resources will be dispatched, when available, for initial and extended attack to 

enhance efficiency and safety of ground and aerial operations. The rapid response speed of 

aerial supervision aircraft is critical to maximizing initial attack safety, effectiveness, and

efficiency. This includes responding to incidents outside of the dispatch zone and GACC 
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

79

boundaries.

The IROC status of BLM exclusive use air attack aircraft and personnel will be updated daily as 

GACC available. Aircraft and personnel will be released from incident at the end of each day to 

be available for IA the following day.

In accordance with NAP 2.5 (FMO Duties) BLM Exclusive Use aircraft will be staffed for sevenday coverage throughout the contract period. Regular Agency employees should be prioritized 

ahead of Casual (AD) employees to staff the aircraft in the event the assigned agency employee 

is not available (days off, etc.).

Air tactical aircraft must meet the avionics typing requirements listed in the SAS, and the pilot 

must be carded to perform the air tactical mission.

The BLM Air Attack Program is managed by the BLM Air Attack Program Manager. This position 

will provide oversight for operational and strategic movement of national funded Exclusive Use 

ATGS Aircraft in coordination with the National/Geographic Area Coordination centers to 

optimize response efficiency and effectiveness during all planning levels.

• The BLM Air Attack Program Manager or designated Fixed Wing Coordinator GACC 

representative shall be consulted on all orders outside of the hosting GACC.

o Factors that should be considered include but are limited to:

1. Closest resource

2. Days off schedule

3. Continued GACC and local coverage

4. Scheduled maintenance

5. Pilot schedules

6. Weather and Fire Behavior Forecast

• Closest resources apply to all immediate fire responses. This does not include GACC 

aviation preposition orders on regional support codes.

5.21.1 Aerial Supervision Personnel

Personnel associated with aerial supervision will be trained to the standards in NWCG PMS 310- 1

and the Standards for Aerial Supervision (SAS). Training and qualification requirements for ASM 

crewmembers are defined in the SAS. Individuals performing duties as an AITS or ATP must be 

certified and authorized by the BLM NAO. AITSs will match days off with the ATP on the aircraft they 

are an aircrew member on. This is for the purpose of maximizing aircraft and crew availability.

ATGS training and currency requirements are contained in NWCG PMS 310-1. However, additional 

currency requirements for BLM ATGS are defined in the SAS. The ATGS Cadre monitors and 

coordinates ATGS personnel and training at the GACC level and coordinates with National Program 

Managers, SAMs, GATRs, and the ATGS Cadre Chair.

Personnel who are performing aerial reconnaissance and detection will not perform aerial 

supervision duties unless they are fully qualified as an ATGS, and the aircraft is equipped and

carded for air tactical operations (reference BLM NAP 5.27.2&3 for additional information on aerial 

observation).

5.21.2 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Aerial Supervision

• BLM has one EU Air Tactical fixed wing contract in Ontario, OR. The contractor provides a 

twin turbine engine aircraft with pilot. There is a dedicated BLM Air Tactical Group 

Supervisor (ATGS) assigned to this resource. The PNW has a dedicated Air Attack

coordinator working at Redmond who help NWCC and SFMO coordinate the movement. 

The NWCC assists with staffing of ATGS platforms throughout the GACC on an
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

80

interagency basis.

• It is our policy in BLM OR/WA, for aerial supervision aircraft (with a qualified ATGS on 

board) to be launched immediately at the beginning of any initial attack response (as 

dictated by WildCAD or run cards) whenever one is reasonably available and if current 

weather conditions allow. This policy supports BLM’s Principles of Fire Suppression Actions, 

that is defined by “Speed and Focus, and Positioning” as stated in Chapter 1 of the 

Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations (Red Book).

5.21.3 District Supplement: (Insert any applicable information on local Unit use of aerial supervision, 

available resources, and personnel.)

5.22 Helicopter Operations

All BLM helicopter operations must be accomplished in accordance with the NWCG Standards 

for Helicopter Operations, (NSHO), unless otherwise waived by the NAO and/or the aircraft 

contract.

The applicable hover out of ground effect (HOGE) chart will be used to determine payload limits 

for all BLM helicopter operations for the first-time landing into remote landing sites, or when the 

pilot deems that environmental conditions warrant use of HOGE chart.

BLM Exclusive Use contracted helicopters must meet the daily minimum staffing levels defined 

by NSHO (Chart 2-1). Exceptions to minimum daily staffing are noted in the Helicopter 

Minimum Staffing Exceptions section of the NSHO.

Utilization of the Robinson R-44 helicopter shall be addressed in the State Aviation Plan. 

Additionally, the aircraft user shall review OAS Safety Information Bulletin NO. 05-02 “R-44 

Helicopters” prior to ordering.

National BLM approval is required for new program requests to host the following:

• Cargo Letdown

• Short-Haul

• Rappel

• Fast Rope

• Single-Skid, Toe-In, and Hover Exit/Entry Operations (STEP)

Requests for approval are initiated by a State Office to the NAO with the final approval made by 

the Division Chief Aviation. The “BLM Aviation Enhancement Application Form” has been 

developed for these requests (reference BLM NAP 3.23).

5.22.1.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: Helicopter Operations

A summary overview of fire aircraft in the PNW is found in Sec. 5.1 above. This section will address 

the three BLM EU helicopter programs in greater detail. Additional aircraft are frequently ordered 

and pre-positioned for initial attack using Severity funding or another supplemental allocation.

Vale District has a Type 3 helicopter on a 90-day EU contract and a 9- person BLM helitack crew. 

The district owns and uses one Plastic Sphere Dispenser (PSD) for aerial ignition, and there is 

three qualified PSD Operators (PLDO) on the crew. The Vale helitack program does not own or 

operate a helitorch, the aircraft costs for daily availability and the hourly flight rate for each contract 

year will be disseminated annually on a State/Regional reference spreadsheet. Flight hour rates are 

subject to change if there is a significant increase in the cost of Jet-A fuel throughout the industry.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

81

Burns District has a Type 2 helicopter contract on an EU contract for 110 days/year. The aircraft 

daily availability and the hourly flight rate for each contract year will be disseminated annually on a 

State/Regional reference spreadsheet. The primary Burns contract helicopter is staffed by a 10- 

person crew. The district owns and uses two PSD machines for aerial ignition. The number of 

qualified PLDO operators vary from year to year.

Lakeview District has a Type 2/medium helicopter on EU contract which is staffed by a 17-person 

interagency helitack crew. The district owns three PSDs for aerial ignition, and there are at least 

three qualified PLDO’s on the crew. The aircraft daily availability and the hourly flight rate for each 

contract year will be disseminated annually on a state/regional reference spreadsheet.

The UAM is the COR on all BLM EU aircraft contracts in Oregon. A DOI-AQD Contracting Officer 

writes formal letters of delegation annually to identify the UAM as the COR any Alternate CORs 

(ACOR). The Helicopter Manager/Crew Supervisor, each Assistant Manager, and the Lead 

Crewmember on each crew are usually designated as Project Inspectors via a letter of delegation 

from the COR.

5.22.1.2 District Supplement: Local Unit Helicopter use, personnel, equipment, training, etc.

5.22.1 Helitack

All helicopter personnel responsibilities are outlined in the NWCG Position Catalog. CWN Helitack 

training and currency requirements are contained in the NWCG PMS 310-1 to include the Federal 

Wildland Fire Qualifications Supplement. Exclusive use helitack minimum crew staffing, training and 

currency requirements are contained in the Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation

Operations. Each unit hosting an exclusive-use helicopter is responsible for providing essential 

management, overhead, equipment, facilities, and the resources necessary to fully support the 

helitack crew.

BLM EU Helitack Crews are encouraged to meet the following staffing levels:

• Type 3 helicopter – 10 helitack personnel

• Type 2 helicopter – 17 helitack personnel

• Type 1 helicopter – 24 helitack personnel

Hover-fill operations are authorized for BLM Exclusive Use helicopter crews and aircraft. Before 

an Exclusive Use Helitack Program utilizes hover-fill operations; training, risk management, and 

operational procedures, must be outlined and approved within their Unit Aviation/Helitack 

Operations Plan.

Helicopter Emergency Longline Last Option (HELLO):

The HELLO mission is defined as transporting a critically injured person from an otherwise 

inaccessible location using a helicopter longline. The HELLO is considered a last resort option 

when other methods are unavailable or cannot respond in the necessary time frame for life

preservation. The HELLO can be considered, utilizing available resources in the field, to perform

such a rescue, when faced with this type of life-threatening situation. The HELLO should be 

performed by exclusive use helicopter programs if possible. The goal is to get a critically injured 

patient to definitive care (hospital) by the quickest means available.

The HELLO supporting documents can be referenced at: BLM Helicopter Web Page

Fire Helicopter Program Strategy:

The fire helicopter program strategy lays out a path forward into the future for the BLM’s helitack 

programs. Some of the items identified in the strategy are:

• Helitack crew size adjustments to realize the full capability of contract helicopters

o Type 1 helicopter crew staffing at 24
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

82

o Type 2 helicopter crew staffing at 17

o Type 3 helicopter crew staffing at 10

• Evaluation of Part 27 or Part 29 twin engine helicopters in Type 2 & 3 operations.

• Expand the Type 1 helicopter program with the addition of 1-2 aircraft.

• Creation of a national helitack Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) document

5.22.2 Single Skid, Toe In, and Hover Exit/Entry Procedures (STEP)

All BLM EU Helitack programs, which are approved to conduct STEP, must outline STEP 

operations in their local aviation plans and adhere to the policies and procedures outlined in 

OPM-40. Exclusive Use Helicopter programs interested in implementing a STEP program must 

follow the steps for new program requests in section 3.23 of the NAP.

5.22.3 Cargo letdown

BLM cargo letdown will be conducted in compliance with the BLM Cargo Letdown Operations.

BLM personnel involved in cargo letdown operations shall record initial and recurrent training on 

the BLM Cargo Letdown Trainee Qualification Record (reference BLM NAP Appendix 6).

5.22.4 Type-1 Helicopter Program

The BLM Type 1 Helicopter Program has a primary mission of initial attack. While most effective 

at providing rapid initial response, the crew is well equipped to respond to extended attack 

incidents and critical need missions on large fires. Extended attack incidents that utilize the crew 

to fill critical positions, should immediately order replacement personnel for those positions in 

case the aircraft and crew are reassigned. BLM States may request to preposition the helicopter 

and crew, either directly to the BLM State Duty Officer hosting the crew, or through the National 

Duty Officer (208-387-5876) followed by a resource order placed through the established 

dispatch channels.

5.23 Aerial Ignition Operations

Aerial ignition operations and projects are accomplished in accordance with the 

NWCG Standards for Aerial Ignition. 

The DOI On-Call Small Helicopter contract provides for vendor supplied helitorch equipment and 

mix/load personnel. If a vendor supplied helitorch operation is desired, the CO must be contacted 

prior to ordering. The CO will negotiate the helitorch services pricing.

5.24 Wild Horse & Burro Operations (WH&B)

Wild Horse and Burro operations will be conducted in accordance with the BLM

WH&B Aviation Management Handbook H-4740-1, the DOI OPM-33 and NAP 4.3.2 Project 

Aviation Safety Planning, if conducted as a flight service contract (reference NAP 3.9 for End 

Product contract procedures).

5.25 Aerial Capture, Eradication and Tagging of Animals (ACETA)

ACETA will be conducted as per the DOI OPM-33, if conducted as a flight service contract 

(reference NAP 3.9 for End Product contract procedures). The DOI On-Call ACETA contract has 

been established to acquire vendor services for ACETA and WH&B operations.

5.26 Smokejumper Operations

Smokejumper dispatch and ordering is accomplished in accordance with the Great Basin, Alaska 

and National Interagency Mobilization Guide.

5.26.1 Smokejumper Personnel

Smokejumpers: Smokejumper operations are performed according to the Interagency
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

83

Smokejumpers Pilots Operations Guide (ISPOG) and the policies and procedures prescribed in 

the Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations.

Smokejumper Pilots: The ISPOG serves as policy for smokejumper pilots’ qualifications, 

training, and operations.

5.27 Light Fixed Wing Operations

Fixed wing dispatch, ordering, and operations must be accomplished in accordance with state 

and unit aviation plans. At minimum flights must meet the requirements outlined in NAP 3.17 for 

flight scheduling/operations.

5.27.1 Low-level Flight Operations (Less than 500’ AGL):

The only fixed-wing aircraft missions authorized for low level operations are:

• Smokejumper/para-cargo

• ASM and lead operations

• Retardant, water, and foam application

• Seeding/spraying

• Other missions approved by a PASP (i.e., resource recon <500’ AGL) 

Operational Procedures:

• Fixed-wing aircraft and pilots must be specifically approved for low-level flight operations.

• No passengers are allowed. Non-pilot participants must be qualified as Aircrew Member.

• A high-level recon will be made prior to low-level flight operations.

• All flights below 500 feet will be contained to the area of operation.

• PPE is required for all fixed-wing, low-level flights (reference ALSE Handbook). Flight 

helmets are not required for multi-engine airtanker crews, smokejumper pilots, lead plane 

and ASM flight/aircrew members.

5.27.2 Aerial Observer

The purpose of Aerial Observer is to locate and relay fire information to fire management. In 

addition to detecting, mapping, and sizing up new fires, this resource may be utilized to 

describe access routes into and out of fire areas for responding units.

Flights as an Aerial Observer and referenced as “Patrol or Detection” designation should 

communicate with tactical aircraft only to announce location, altitude and to relay their 

departure direction and altitude from the incident. Training Requirements: Federal Wildland

Fire Qualifications Supplement.

Only qualified aerial supervisors (ATGS, ASM, HLCO and LPIL) are authorized to coordinate 

aircraft operations in incident airspace and give tactical direction to aviation assets.

5.27.3 Non-Fire Reconnaissance

BLM non-fire fixed wing mission flights require at least one agency person on that flight or at 

the departure/arrival base meet the IAT requirements of Flight Manager. Agency personnel 

must meet IAT requirements for Fixed Wing Flight Manager or NWCG comparable position. 

Reference OPM-04 One Way NWCG Position to IAT Position Crosswalk. 

https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/opm-04.pdf

5.27.4 Single Engine IFR/Night Flight

For single engine night flight reference 351 DM 1.3. 

5.27.5 Backcountry Airstrip Operations

Reserved

5.28 Law Enforcement Operations (LE)
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

84

LE personnel involved in any aviation operation will adhere to DOI and Bureau aviation policy. 

Local LE personnel that are required to utilize aircraft to support LE operations shall discuss all 

aspects of the operation with the UAM or SAM, well in advance of operations. The BLM SAM 

must be briefed on all BLM law enforcement involvement in Short-Haul missions occurring within 

their state. The UAM will review all LE PASPs prior to commencing operations. Line officers shall 

be informed of LE aviation activities within their area of responsibility.

LE personnel involved with aviation activities shall receive and be current in required aviation 

training (NWCG and/or IAT) commensurate with the aviation position they will fill, prior to any 

aviation operations.

LE personnel will utilize aircraft and pilots that have been approved by OAS (carded/LOA/MOU) 

for the intended use.

Aircraft contracted for fire/resource operations are allowed to conduct non-threatening 

surveillance and reconnaissance law enforcement missions only.

• Certain LE operations could lead to actions in conflict with DOI policy (reference BLM 

NAP 5.6 Emergency Exception to Policy).

• Certain exceptions to policy for undercover Law Enforcement operations are addressed 

in 351 DM 1.6.D.

5.28.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: PNW Law Enforcement (LE) Operations Reference Appendix

#10 Oregon and Washington Law Enforcement Aviation Operations Supplement

The DM or special agent and the UAM will ensure all flights are properly coordinated. A 

PASP/MASP will be developed, and approval signatures acquired prior to each mission. The local 

Dispatch Center Manager must be notified of any non-emergency BLM law enforcement aviation 

mission at least 12 hours in advance and be provided with a copy of the PASP/MASP. All planning 

and operations will incorporate risk management principles and require a thorough pre-mission 

briefing with pilots, observers, the flight manager, and aircrew.

5.28.2 District Supplement: Local Unit law enforcement aviation personnel and program

5.29 Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) (see also BLM NAP 3.16)

Minimum Operational Requirements: The following requirements must be met prior to any 

operational use of UAS:

• Approved operations plan:

o PASP (non-fire/incident, planned project)

o Flight by notification (non-fire/incident spontaneous flight)

o Fire/Incident: See below

• Airspace authorization (part 107, DOI/FAA MOA, COA, or SGI).

• Certified Remote Pilot(s) possessing DOI (OAS 30-U) and FAA Remote Pilot certificates.

• Certified UAS and current UAS data cards (OAS-36U).

• A NOTAM must be filed for all operations other than standard part 107 flights.

• UAS NOTAMs are depicted online on the Sky Vector website.

• Personally owned UAS or model aircraft may not be used by federal agencies or their 

employees.

Interagency Fire/Incident UAS Operations:

• Fire/Incident UAS Operations information is posted on the Interagency Fire UAS Website.

• Questions pertinent to incident UAS Operations or UAS ordering should be routed to the
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

85

UAS Fire Coordinator at 208-387-5335.

• Fire/incident flights shall be conducted in accordance with the NWCG Standards for Fire

UAS Operations (PMS 515) and the Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation

Operations.

• Flights within a TFR require a Special Government Interest Waiver (SGI). SGI requests 

shall be routed to the FAA via the UAS Fire Coordinator (208-387-5335).

• Cooperators, pilot associations and volunteer aviation groups or individuals may offer to 

fly unmanned aviation missions (i.e., aerial surveys, fire reconnaissance, infrared 

missions, etc.) at no charge to the IMTs. Although these offers seem very attractive, we 

cannot accept these services unless they meet FAA, USFS/DOI policy.

5.29.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement: UAS Operations

(See also Sec. 3.16)

There are numerous OAS-carded UAS operators employed in BLM OR/WA. Operators are 

required to comply with currency and refresher requirements defined in DOI Secretarial Order 3379, 

issued in January 2020 and Executive Order 13981 issued in January 2021.

Bureau remote system operations are still fixed by these orders but in preparation of relief from these, 

NOA has drafted an interim strategy plan for transition to new fleet, training, and policy expectations 

congruent to bureau priorities, and legislation (Dingell Act) mandating the deployment and integration 

of optionally piloted technologies.

This national strategy document outlines the 12–18-month approach to the elements listed below of 

the BLM Remote Pilot and Remote Systems program. The plan outlines an approach to this next era 

conservatively, deliberately, and with purpose and remain committed to research – development – 

testing – training – evaluation (RDTTE). The NAO goal is to continue to learn through measured 

growth over the next 5 years to determine maximum utilization and management strategies for UAS in 

the BLM and posture the bureau for sustainable success.

Bureau strategy will remain focused on operational and programmatic stability to include improving 

aircraft capacity, professional pilot pathway, inspection and carding standards, systems, and sensor 

management, and developing training curriculum while maintaining the BLM standard and reputation 

for quality and service.

Systems

• ‘Smalls’ Program - The 5-year strategy is to ensure, at a minimum, States have UAS capacity 

if desired.

• The BLM program was built upon Type 4 (small) UAS. Statistically, approximately 80% of (all) 

agency remote piloted missions are conducted with Type 4 aircraft.

• Given these lessons learned, the BLM program strategy is to implement capacity effectively 

and efficiently through utilization of approved Type 4 remote systems.

• Upon policy relief and in the best-case scenario, approved next generation systems will not be 

available at the Field Office level until the Spring of 2023. (Projected manufacturing and 

distribution delays are driving this).

• Current remote pilots should develop a plan to transfer legacy systems in communication with 

the Bureau Fleet Manager by December 2023 unless otherwise directed.

• The RDTTE approach towards Type 3 UAS will be led nationally and through BLM units with 

existing Type 3 capability once a Type 3 replacement platform is identified and approved.

• Type 1 and 2 large UAS are under continued evaluation nationally. Direction and utilization 

for this class of system will be determined on a case-by-case basis.

• Individual Fleet Accounts for each state will be managed by SAMs or designees in 

coordination with Bureau Fleet Manager. Fleet Account for National Aviation Office (NAO) 
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

86

and National Operations Center (NOC) will be managed by the Bureau Fleet Manager.

Inspections – Carding

• Initial carding will remain the responsibility of the DOI Office of Aviation Services (OAS) upon 

successful completion of approved Basic Remote Pilot Training.

• A-454 Add-On Training will be the responsibility of the National Aviation Office (NAO). Any 

remote pilots who need carding on a new aircraft should coordinate with their SAM and the 

NAO for scheduling and completion.

• The NAO is drafting a remote pilot inspection and carding standard consistent with OAS 

policy. The standard will ensure a consistent, professional approach for remote pilots to 

remain proficient and current, including initial and annual knowledge, and performance 

evaluations.

Training

• Training is evolving where training already exists. Training is also in development where it 

does not exist.

• BLM Remote Pilot Corps: The pathway and investment towards professional remote pilot in 

the BLM will include enhanced, objective based knowledge and performance testing, and 

evaluation commensurate with lessons learned, cost of aircraft, and responsibility of flying in 

ever increasing complex airspace.

• BLM Remote Pilot Program standard to date has been that remote pilot candidates will not be 

entered into training without approved aircraft. Policy restrictions from SO3379 and EO13981 

have limited new pilot training since early 2020 due to lack of approved systems. Until new 

Type 3 and 4 systems are approved, new remote pilot candidacy will remain minimal.

• The NAO is developing a reintegration training plan for Bureau remote pilots who wish to 

reestablish proficiency and currency when operations beyond emergency response resume 

(per SO3379).

5.29.2 District Supplement: 

5.30 Fleet Aircraft

The BLM currently operates seven Fleet aircraft. N49SJ, N190PE, N32PX, N437CC, N618, 

N162GC, and N700FW are DOI owned aircraft operated by the BLM.

• N49SJ is a De Havilland DHC-6 Twin Otter; the primary mission is smokejumper delivery. 

BLM NAO provides overall management of the aircraft. The aircraft is assigned to the 

Great Basin Smokejumpers, in Boise.

• N190PE is a Pilatus PC-12; the primary mission is utility and fire logistics support. BLM 

NAO provides overall management of the PC-12. The aircraft is assigned to Alaska Fire 

Service a portion of the year and Boise NAO the balance of that year.

• N32PX is a Cessna 206; the primary mission is as a utility aircraft. The BLM AlaskaOffice of Law Enforcement and Security will have primary use of the aircraft through the 

calendar year flown by dual function special agent/ranger-pilots. The management of the 

aircraft will fall under the BLM Alaska Aviation Office with mission management under 

AFO/AKSO and Anchorage Interagency Dispatch Center.

• N437CC is a CubCrafters CC-18-180 Top Cub. The primary mission is as a utility aircraft. 

The BLM Alaska Office of Law Enforcement and Security will have primary use of the 

aircraft through the calendar year and flown by dual function special agent/ranger-pilots. 

The management of the aircraft will fall under the BLM Alaska Aviation Office with 

mission management under FDO/AKSO and Anchorage Interagency Dispatch Center.

• N618 and N162GC are Beechcraft Super King Air B200’s; the primary mission is 

ASM/lead plane operations. BLM NAO maintains overall management responsibility. The

aircraft is assigned to the National Aviation Office.

• N700FW is a Quest Kodiak K-100; the primary mission is utility and fire logistics support.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

87

BLM NAO provides overall management of the K-100. The aircraft is assigned to Alaska 

Fire Service a portion of the year and Boise NAO the balance of that year.

BLM fleet aircraft are operated in accordance with the BLM Fleet Aircraft Standard Operations 

Procedures Guide (reference BLM NAP Appendix 7).

5.31 Non-Federally Approved Aircraft

Reference Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations, Chapter 16 for protocols 

regarding utilization of non-federally approved aircraft in response to federal wildfire: 

https://www.nifc.gov/standards/guides/red-book

5.32 Snow Operations

All snow operations will be conducted per Departmental Policy. 351 DM1.3 J(4) Snow 

Operations, 351 DM1.6 Special Operations (A) Cold Weather & 351 DM 1.7 Special Use 

Activities.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

88

6.0 Aviation Training

6.1 General

Aviation training is essential to ensure that BLM maintains a safe and efficient aviation operation 

in pursuit of the Bureau’s mission. Aviation users, supervisors, and managers need to make 

certain that they and their employees are knowledgeable of the inherent hazards of aviation 

operations and have been provided the necessary skills, training, and equipment to be

successful conducting aviation operations. There are two separate, but linked, training programs 

for BLM Aviation: NWCG fire curriculum and Interagency Aviation Training (IAT) non-fire 

curriculum.

6.1.1 Fire Training and Qualifications

The National Wildland Coordinating Group (NWCG) guides fire and fire aviation qualifications. 

Personnel serving in NWCG positions need only meet the qualification and currency 

requirements required in the NWCG Standards for Wildland Fire Positions Qualifications, 

PMS 310-1 or other interagency guidance as appropriate (smokejumper Spotter, ATS, 

ATGS, LPIL, BLM Exclusive Use Helitack, etc.).

BLM agency-specific qualifications not in the PMS 310-1 can be found in the Federal

Wildland Fire Qualification Supplement.

6.1.2 Aviation Training for Non-Fire Flight Activities and Positions

The DOI Aviation User’s Interagency Aviation Training Program (IAT) regulates the “non-fire” aviation 

training requirements for Bureau personnel. Individuals holding a current qualification under the 

Incident Qualification Certification System (IQCS) may also be qualified to perform some equivalent 

non-fire aviation positions under IAT guidelines and do not require additional IAT training. Reference: 

One-Way NWCG Position to IAT Position Crosswalk located within Interagency Aviation Training (IAT)

Guide.

Training requirements for non-fire aviation positions are in OPM-4. A description of each position and 

role can be found in the Interagency Aviation Training (IAT) Guide.

Aircrew Member: An Aircrew member is a person working in and around aircraft who is 

essential to ensure the safety and successful outcome of the mission. Aircrew Members are 

required to:

• Be on board or to attend to the loading and unloading of passengers and cargo at all 

landings and takeoffs

• Attend to external loads

• Ensure all passengers have received a safety briefing prior to all flights.

Required training:

• A-100* Basic Aviation Safety (required in classroom for initial training)

• A-110 Aviation Transportation of Hazardous Materials

• A-200* Mishap Review

*Required every three years

An employee may be authorized to complete the initial Aircrew Member training on-line, on a 

case-by-case basis and at the discretion of the SAM. A written request must come from the 

employee’s supervisor to the SAM explaining why it is not feasible to attend and complete a 

classroom A-100 Basic Aviation Safety course prior to the day of the mission.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

89

BLM requires that personnel involved with helicopter external load operations must comply with 

the following:

• All personnel involved in hover hook ups must complete S-271 Helicopter Crewmember 

or A-219 Interagency Helicopter Transport of External Loads.

• All personnel involved in long line work must be either:

o Currently qualified as a Helicopter Crewmember (HECM) or;

o Currently qualified as an aircrew member and completed A-219.

• Documentation for non-fire personnel, indicating the completion of the required training to 

perform external load work must be maintained at the interagency aviation training 

website: https://www.iat.gov/.

• BLM adheres to the Federal Wildland Fire Qualifications Supplement which requires 

triennial A-219 and A-110 attendance to maintain Helicopter Long Line/Remote Hook 

Specialist (HELR) qualifications.

BLM Pilot – Fleet (2101, 2181 position series) & Incidental/Dual Function:

All pilots will be entered into a pilot training program approved by the BLM Division Chief, 

Aviation.

Minimum pilot training requirements for DOI employee pilots are outlined in OPM-22.

6.2 Management Responsibility

Supervisors and managers are those individuals that have management or supervisory oversight 

responsibilities for programs using aviation resources for mission accomplishment.

6.2.1 Supervisory Personnel

A person who supervises employees that use aircraft to accomplish Bureau programs (first and 

second level supervisors). These may include but are not limited to such positions as State Fire 

Management Officers and their Deputy/Assistant, District Fire Management Officers, Dispatch 

Center Managers, Wild Horse and Burro Program Supervisors and Law Enforcement 

Supervisors.

Required Training: 

• *M-3 Aviation Management for Supervisors (initial course either in a classroom or online)

• *A-200 Mishap Review

*Required every three years

6.2.2 Line Managers

Line managers are those individuals who are responsible and accountable for using aviation resources to accomplish BLM programs. These may include but are not limited to such positions 

as State Directors and their Deputy/Associate, District Managers, Field Office Managers, Fire 

and Aviation Assistant and Deputy Assistant Directors.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

90

Required Training: 

• *M-3 Aviation Management for Supervisors (initial course either in a classroom or online)

or

• *M-2 DOI Aviation Management for Line Managers briefing

*Required every three years

6.2.3 Aviation Managers at the Local, State and National Level

Individuals with aviation management responsibilities for a unit, state, regional or national level 

and serve as a focal point for aviation services and management. These include such positions 

as unit aviation managers (UAM/UAO), state, regional and national program managers, and 

helicopter and fixed-wing operations specialists. Aviation Managers must meet the training 

requirements outlined in the IAT Guide.

6.2.3.1 BLM Oregon/Washington Supplement:

All managers and supervisors responsible for oversight of programs that use aviation resources 

for mission accomplishment need and shall comply with IAT requirements for their agency 

position. This covers fire management and other programs using aviation resources. UAS is an 

aviation program, this includes programs that use UAS. Personnel assigned with aviation duties 

and/or responsibilities that are identified in more than one position in the IAT matrix, must satisfy 

training requirements for all positions (i.e., supervisor and aviation manager, fire, and non-fire 

positions).

1) Supervisors. Supervisors must complete M-3 Aviation Management for Supervisors and A200 Mishap Review every three years. Knowledge required includes aviation safety, policy, 

risk management, and supervisory responsibilities. Included are crew, helitack and engine 

supervisors that oversee remote pilots and/or employees that function as aircrew-members.

2) Line Managers/Officers. Line managers must complete the M-3 Aviation Management for 

Supervisors and/or complete the M-2 Aviation Management Line Managers Briefing course 

depending on the supervisory responsibilities, and/or A-314 Forest Service line officers 

(depending on their agency of over-sight) every three years. Knowledge required includes 

familiarization with the DOI (and USDA Forest Service where applicable) aviation management 

program, policies, and related requirements and responsibilities.

3) Aviation Managers: Must meet the identified “aviation manager” position training 

requirements. This includes regional/state and district level UAMs, and aviation program 

managers.

6.2.4 Aviation Contracting Responsibilities COR Training Requirements

BLM CORs and alternate CORs, on BLM exclusive use contracts, are required to have training in 

DOI aviation policy, basic contract administration, and contract performance verification and 

understanding technical aspects of contracts. Initial and recurrent COR training requirements can 

be found in the DOI COR Manual or obtained from AQD contracting officers. CORs are required 

to be registered in the FAI Cornerstone OnDemand (CSOD) and be certified as a COR by the 

Federal Acquisition Institute before performing the duties of the position on a DOI contract. FACCOR initial requests and renewal/maintenance requests should be submitted through the Lead 

Acquisition Official in the State for submission to the Bureau Procurement Chief in WO. These 

should not be submitted directly to DOI.

6.2.5 Contractor and Cooperator Pilot Training

BLM aviation managers at all levels are responsible for assuring that contractors and 

cooperators are provided adequate briefings of mission requirements, standards, and 

procedures. This may be accomplished through classroom training, computer-based training,
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

91

simulations, pre-work conferences, aircraft and pilot inspections, pre-flight briefings, or other 

appropriate venues.

6.2.6 Pinch Hitter Training

Pinch Hitter training is encouraged to be completed by aviation personnel whose primary job 

requires extended flight time as an aircrew member, Spotter, ATGS or reconnaissance duties. 

Requests for training should be routed via your immediate supervisor to your respective State 

Aviation Manager (SAM).

6.3 Instructor Standards

• Standards for NWCG Instructors are outlined in NWCG Standards for Course Delivery

PMS 901-1 .

• Instructors for IAT courses will meet the IAT trainer requirements of the 

Interagency Aviation Training Guide.

6.4 Development

The NAO offers an Aviation Leadership Development Initiative (ALDI) opportunity for aircraft 

managers and unit aviation managers. This opportunity is available to GS-7 to GS-9 individuals 

who currently have aviation management responsibilities along with an interest in a career in 

aviation management. An Instruction Memorandum is issued periodically informing potential

candidates of the opportunity and application process. The program runs approximately 24-28 

months, while maintaining the employees’ current position requirements.

Aviation/Pilot and Pilot Mentor Developmental Program: The NAO has two separate 

Aviation/Pilot Developmental Programs that provide training for employee development in the 

aviation manager and pilot career paths. The objective for these positions is to develop well 

qualified aviation managers and pilot candidates with the necessary skills and background to 

compete for interagency aviation vacancies at the state and national level. These opportunities 

are for BLM employees that meet the requirements of 351 DM 3.2 and have identified career 

goals in flight operations. These programs are filled on an as needed basis and as candidates 

are identified.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

92

7.0 Airspace Coordination

7.1 Interagency Airspace Coordination

Interagency airspace coordination is accomplished through the Interagency Airspace 

Subcommittee (IASC) charted under the NIAC. Guidance and education are provided through

the NWCG Standards for Airspace Coordination.

7.2 Flight Planning, Hazards and Obstructions

It is the pilots’ responsibility to plan the flight and meet the requirements of 14 CFR 91.103 

Preflight action. It is the flight manager’s responsibility to provide information to the pilot for the 

project area and mission objectives. It is the aircraft dispatcher’s responsibility to inform the 

aircrew of “boundary airspace” issues and coordinate with neighboring dispatch centers 

(reference Airspace Boundary Plan, this chapter). State/districts are responsible to develop area 

flight hazard maps or planning tools that are posted at: operating bases, aircrew briefing 

packages, and dispatch office. The following hazards or locally significant areas should be 

depicted:

• Military Airspace – Warning Area (WA), Restricted Area (RA), Military Operations Area 

(MOA), Alert Area (AA), Prohibited Area (PA), Military Training Routes (MTRs) such as 

instrument flight rules military training routes (IR), visual flight rules military training routes 

(VR), Controlled Firing Areas (CFA), Slow Routes (SR), Aerial Refueling Routes (ARs) 

and Low Altitude Tactical Navigation (LATN) Areas.

• Airspace – Class B/C/D and National Security Areas

• Airports/airstrips – public and private, military

• Dispatch zone boundaries

• Parachute, hang glider, rocket, model airplane operating areas

• Towers over 200 feet. Other towers as locally determined significant

• Wires – Major transmission lines, other lines determined locally as significant (wires 

crossing – canyons, rivers, lakes, near airports)

• Update/Revision date

7.3 Fire Traffic Area (FTA)

The FTA provides agency communication protocol through a standardized structure to enhance 

air traffic separation over wildfire or All-Risk incidents. The structure emphasizes established 

communications, clearances, and compliances. See the SAS for details.

7.4 Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR)

To enhance safety during an incident, the FAA may be requested to issue a TFR that closes the 

airspace to non-participating aircraft (with some exceptions). While there are currently nine 

different types of TFRs, the most issued TFR for wildfire is 14 CFR 91,137 (a) 2 which is explicit 

as to what aviation operations are prohibited, restricted, or allowed. Aviation Managers requesting

a TFR should be familiar with the ordering procedures, coordination protocol and exceptions that 

are outlined in Chapter 6 of the NWCG Standards for Airspace Coordination. TFRs are not 

authorized by the FAA for resource management projects or planned prescribed fires. A NOTAM 

D may be requested through the aircraft dispatcher at a local GACC who will contact the local 

Flight Service Station (FSS).
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

93

Non wildfire TFRs are under the jurisdiction of the FAA. All participants involved with an “all risk” 

TFR should be acquainted with the FAA’s publication “FAA Airspace Management Plan for

Disasters”.

Presidential (VIP) TFRs (91.141) involve a set of concentric circular Temporary Flight 

Restrictions with a 10 nautical mile diameter inner ring inside a 30 nautical mile outer ring. Flights 

within the Presidential TFRs require coordination well in advance of the TFR implementation. For 

further information, contact a qualified Airspace Coordinator.

7.5 National Firefighting Aircraft Transponder Code (1255)

The FAA has provided the 1255 transponder code as the national designation for firefighting 

aircraft. It is not agency specific. The code must be utilized by aircraft responding to and 

operating over fire incidents supporting suppression operations unless otherwise directed by air 

traffic control (ATC). It is not to be used for repositioning or during cross-country flights. It is 

authorized specifically for firefighting and is not to be used for FEMA or all-risk disasters.

Reference NWCG Standards for Airspace Coordination, PMS 520 and NWCG Standards for

Aerial Supervision. PMS 505.

7.6 Airspace Boundary Plan

When resources are dispatched by multiple units to an incident or area that shares a common 

boundary, care should be taken to ensure safe separation and communication of responding 

aircraft. Boundary Plans should be prepared that focus on a 10 NM wide “neutral airspace” 

corridor for mutual or exchanged initial attack areas or zones. Agencies conducting flight activity 

within the boundary corridors should implement notification procedures to adjoining agencies and 

cooperators (reference NWCG Standards for Airspace Coordination Chapter 7 for details). 

7.7 Airspace Deconfliction

While the word “deconflict” is not in the dictionary, it is a commonly used aviation term describing 

the process of reducing the risk of a mid-air collision or a TFR intrusion. Airspace deconfliction 

should occur for both emergency response and non-emergency aviation activities.

Deconfliction can be accomplished through the following measures:

• Pilots must obtain all information pertinent to flight before flying. This is accomplished by 

obtaining a briefing from the FAA through the Flight Service Stations. This is the official 

source of NOTAM information.

• Dispatching units should obtain scheduling information from DOD units that have special 

use airspace or military training routes and share this information as “Aircraft Hazards” 

information on the NWCG Aircraft Dispatch Form, PMS 250 when the aircraft are 

dispatched. For non-emergency flights, information should be shared through common 

communication protocol.

• A variety of aviation Internet websites are frequently used for obtaining airspace 

information, the user must be aware of any disclaimers regarding the timeliness of the 

information posted. The FAA’s U.S. NOTAM office provides current TFR information 

through DOD Internet NOTAM Service (DINS) at: 

https://www.notams.faa.gov/dinsQueryWeb/ and http://tfr.faa.gov/tfr2/list.html
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

94

7.8 Airspace Conflicts

Aviation personnel have a responsibility to identify and notify the Air Route Traffic Control Center 

(ARTCC) and report conflicts and incidents through the Interagency SAFECOM System to assist 

in the resolution of airspace conflicts. When a conflict or incident occurs, it may indicate a 

significant aviation safety hazard. Conflicts may include near mid-air collisions (NMAC), TFR 

intrusions, and FTA communication non-compliance. Further guidance is available in the NWCG

Standards for Airspace Coordination, Chapter 8.

7.9 Operations Along Foreign Borders

All aircraft operations along border patrol zones require coordination with the U.S. Border Patrol. 

The Dispatch Centers with foreign border zones will have an operational plan detailing the 

coordination measures with the U.S. Border Patrol Air Marine Operations Center (AMOC). All 

pilots and aircrews will be briefed about border zone flight procedures.

7.10 Airspace Agreements – Memorandums of Understanding

When Special Use Airspace (SUAs), MTR’s, Slow Routes (SRs), or Aerial Refueling Routes 

(ARs) are located over public lands administered by BLM or in areas frequently utilized for flight 

operations (fire or non-fire), the BLM should consider instituting an agreement with the 

appropriate DOD entity that schedules the airspace. Airspace agreements provide DOD and 

local agency dispatch centers and aviation managers with a tool that shares contact information 

and defines protocols for time-critical airspace deconfliction, response coordination, and 

resolution of issues.

A template and sample format are provided in the NWCG Standards for Airspace Coordination,

Chapter 12.

7.11 Emergency Security Control of Air Traffic (ESCAT)

ESCAT may be implemented due to an air defense emergency as directed by the North American 

Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD). Reference NWCG Standards for Airspace Coordination,

Chapter 4.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

95

8.0 Aviation Security – Facilities/Aircraft

8.1 Aviation Security Policy

The policies and procedures in this chapter are intended to make the theft of BLM owned or 

contracted aircraft more difficult and time consuming and therefore an unattractive target to 

potential criminals or terrorists. The BLM security program includes the following elements:

Department of Interior Security Policy: Departmental Manuals 444-1 and 352 DM 5 set forth 

the security requirements for all DOI aviation facilities and assigned aircraft. Reference DOI 

Aviation Security Policy 352 DM 5:

Scope and Applicability

• To the extent applicable, the policies and procedures established herein are intended to 

supplement the minimum physical security standards detailed in 444 DM 1, Appendix A. 

Nothing in this chapter reduces the requirements prescribed by 444 DM 1, Physical 

Protection and Building Security, or any other requirement established by law or authority 

as it pertains to DOI aviation operations.

• The policies and procedures established herein are applicable to all BLM aviation 

facilities and aircraft owned or controlled by the DOI.

• Contractors are solely responsible for the security of their aircraft while under the control 

of the DOI. All DOI aviation contracts will include language describing the DOI aviation 

security policies applicable to contractor operations and require contractor compliance 

with those policies.

Definitions:

The term “aircraft operations area” (AOA) means the area within an aviation facility in which 

flight-capable aircraft are present for any purpose, including but not limited to the loading or 

unloading of cargo or passengers, refueling, maintenance, parking, and storage.

The term “aviation facility” means any DOI owned or controlled real property used for aircraft 

landing and takeoff at which DOI owned or controlled aircraft are permanently based. (352

DM5.4B) 

The term “control” is used in two contexts.

• As it relates to aviation facilities, the term “control” refers to the condition existing when a 

BLM entity has authority to institute, modify or otherwise effect physical security changes 

at an aviation facility regardless of property ownership.

• As it relates to aircraft, the term “control” means “operational control” as defined in the 

Federal Aviation Regulations at 41 CFR 1.1: “Operational control with respect to a flight 

means the exercise of authority over initiating, conducting or terminating a flight.” This 

definition is independent of aircraft ownership.

The term “dual-lock method” means using a combination of two locking devices or methods to 

physically secure or disable a parked aircraft for the purpose of reducing the probability of aircraft 

theft and associated misuse by unauthorized persons.

The term “risk assessment” refers to the result of a combined threat and vulnerability 

assessment. It can generally be characterized as an analysis of the probability of serious impact 

or damage resulting from a known or postulated threat successfully exploiting on or more 

vulnerabilities
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

96

Risk Assessment

A “risk assessment” will be conducted for each BLM aviation facility (see definition above). Each 

aviation facility risk assessment will be periodically reexamined and adjusted as necessary to 

ensure it accurately reflects current conditions. At a minimum, reexaminations shall be 

conducted and documented every 2 years.

Security Plans

Security plans will conform to the following conditions:

• The “Field Reference Guide for Aviation Security for Airport or other Aviation Facilities”

(AAF) is intended to provide a standardized method of assessing aviation airport 

facilities. Each unit is encouraged to utilize this written document to identify the 

appropriate level of security planning needed. https://www.doi.gov/aviation/library/guides

• Individuals preparing aviation facility security plans can reference the TSA “Security

Guidelines for General Aviation Airports” TSA Information Publication A-001, which is 

available on the TSA Website at www.tsa.gov

• The scope and depth of the aviation facility security plan should be commensurate with 

the size and operations complexity of the facility for which it is prepared.

Training

Employees involved in the control or use of aviation resources or facilities shall complete the 

appropriate level of aviation security training (aircrew member minimum). 

BLM Specific Policy/Guidance:

BLM HSPD12 Policy: https://www.nifc.gov/about-us/our-partners/blm/aviation/security

Aviation Security Questionnaire: https://www.nifc.gov/about-us/our-partners/blm/aviation/security

8.2 USFS Facilities Security Assessments

Reserved

8.3 USFS Security Response Actions

Reserved

8.4 General Aviation Security Awareness Programs

The BLM utilizes the AOPA Airport Watch Program for Security Awareness: 

http://www.aopa.org/airportwatch/

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) TSA implemented a national toll-free hotline that 

the general aviation (GA) community can use to report any “out-of-the-ordinary” event or activity 

at airports. The hotline is operated by the National Response Center and centralizes reporting to 

the appropriate local, state, and federal agencies.

To report any suspicious activity at your airport- Call (866) GA-SECURE (866) 427-3287
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

97

8.5 Cooperators Aircraft Security

Military or government agency cooperator aircraft under DOI operational control shall adhere to 

their department-specific aircraft security policies.

8.6 Aircraft Physical Security Requirements

At any time, an aircraft, controlled or owned by the DOI, is not directly attended by its assigned 

flight crew, ground crew, or government managers, it will be physically secured in a manner that 

disables the aircraft from being utilized.

Exceptions

• Military or government agency cooperator aircraft under DOI operational control. Such 

cooperator aircraft shall adhere to their department-specific aircraft security policies.

• Aircraft mechanically incapable of flight.

Security Devices: The DOI aircraft contracts specify the aircraft security measures and it is the 

contractors’ responsibility for the aircraft security. Approved security devices require using a dual 

lock method consisting of any combination of anti-theft devices attached to the aircraft for the 

sole purpose of locking flight controls, aircraft power, or directional ground movement. Pilots and 

aircrews must be diligent in pre-flight procedures to prevent engine start up with security 

measures in place. These may include any combination of the following:

• Locking hanger doors

• Keyed Magneto, starter, or master switch

• Hidden battery cut-off switches

• Throttle, mixture/fuel, fuel cut-off locks

• Control surface gust-locks; propeller locks (chain, cable, mechanical) - (airplane only)

• Locking wheel, chock, or aircraft tie downs

• “Club-type” devices for control yoke

8.7 Aviation Facility Security Requirements

Security risk assessments will be performed on all BLM aviation facilities, temporary bases, and 

aviation airport facilities (AAF) which meet the definition of “aviation facility”, using the

DOI Field Security Guidelines for General Aviation.

• Completed assessment should be housed within the unit’s aviation plan as an appendix 

or chapter.

Aviation Facility Security – Suggested Enhancements

After completing the AAF Airport Characteristics Measurement tool and determining your 

facilities total score, reference the Suggested Airport Security Enhancements template included 

within the Field Reference Guide for Aviation Security for Airport or other Aviation Facilities 

(AAF) pg. 6.

• The total score obtained from the Airport Characteristics Measurement Tool is considered 

minimum mandatory security requirements.

For a more in-depth list of suggested airport Security Enhancements reference TSA Information 

Publication A-001, Security Guidelines for General Aviation Airports, Appendix B: www.tsa.gov
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

98

Suggested area enhancement may include:

Signage

• Signage should be multi-lingual where appropriate.

Lighting

• Lighting type and illumination levels will comply with published Illuminating Engineering 

Society (IES) standards and will not supersede standard aviation guidelines governing 

runway lighting and nighttime flight requirements.

Fencing

• Install perimeter security fencing as needed to control access to the AOA and all other 

sensitive areas.

• Fence height and other characteristics will comply with standard FAA guidelines where 

appropriate. Where FAA guidelines are not available, minimum fencing characteristics will 

be sufficient to meet access control needs.

Access Control

• The number of access points should be minimized, with their use and conditions regularly 

monitored.

• Any access point through a fence or other boundary should not only be able to control or 

prevent access, but also differentiate between an authorized and an unauthorized user.

• Anti-pass back, anti-piggyback and anti-tailgating systems or protocols should be 

implemented where appropriate.

• Gates when appropriate, should be constructed and installed to the same or greater 

standard of security as any adjacent fencing to maintain the integrity of the area. 

Pedestrian/personnel gates can be constructed using a basic padlock or designed with 

an electrical or mechanical locks or keypad/card system.

8.8 Exceptions

If facility ownership or control constraints preclude full implementation of the identified minimum 

mandatory security requirements, notification must be immediately given to the NAO in writing.

• Written notification will detail the minimum mandatory security requirements(s) which 

cannot be implemented and the circumstances preventing the implementation. A waiver 

of the requirements may be requested.

• Pending the response, the facility will comply with 352 DM 5.10, “Aircraft Physical 

Security Requirements.”

8.9 Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

BLM employees who are traveling on commercial airlines are personally responsible for 

compliance with TSA and DOT hazardous cargo regulations.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

99

9.0 Aviation Facilities

9.1 General

All BLM aviation support facilities will be constructed, maintained, and operated in compliance to 

applicable regulations/direction of DOI, BLM, FAA, OSHA, and lease agreements.

9.2 Aviation Facilities (Permanent and Temporary)

BLM has permanent and temporary airbases managed by the districts/field offices. Permanent 

air bases include heavy airtanker and SEAT retardant bases, and airplane and 

helibase/heliport facilities with permanent or temporary fixtures that are used on a continuous 

or seasonal basis. These aircraft bases of operations include government owned or leased 

aviation facilities on federal or non-federal land where BLM has primary responsibility for 

operations, maintenance, and oversight. Facility base reviews shall be conducted in 

accordance with the NWCG Standards for Helicopter Operations (NSHO), Appendix E; 

NWCG Standards for Airtanker Base Operations (SABO), Appendix M and Interagency

Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations, Chapter 18, as appropriate.

9.3 Temporary Operations Bases

Temporary operations bases are those that are used to support short term projects and wildland 

fire. These bases can be located on federal, state, local government, or private land. Permission to 

operate on the land should be obtained prior to use. Land use agreements may have to be set up 

describing payment terms, use limitations and land restoration measures. For wildland fire 

operations the NWCG Standards for Chapter 20 (20-4) describes procedures for land use 

agreements. Only procurement officials with warrant authority may enter into agreements. For nonwildland fire situations, the state/district procurement official is the point of contact for agreements.

BLM Smokejumper Bases: The BLM Smokejumpers’ primary operations bases are Fairbanks, 

Alaska, and Boise, Idaho. Each smokejumper base has multiple sub-bases that are established to 

support smokejumper operations on as-needed basis. Some sub-bases are in BLM owned facilities 

and some are leased.

9.4 Safety

Aviation facilities must comply with safety regulations described in DOI manuals, guides and 

handbooks, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Buildings, equipment,

and aircraft operating surfaces (helibase, airplane parking and retardant base) will be inspected 

annually for safety and maintenance deficiencies, by the unit aviation manager and/or unit health 

and safety officers.

9.5 Permanent Facility Construction Planning/Funding and Maintenance

Reference BLM Manual 9100 - Engineering

FAAForm7480-1 - NoticeforConstruction,AlterationandDeactivationofAirports:Title 14 Code of Federal 

Regulations Part 157 requires all persons to notify the FAA at least 90 days before construction, 

alteration, activation, deactivation, or change to the status or use of a civil or joint-use (civil/military) 

airport. (As used herein, the term “airport” means any Landing or Takeoff Area, e.g., airport, 

heliport, vertiport, gliderport, seaplane base, ultralight flightpark, or balloonport.) 
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

100

9.6 BLM Owned/Operated Airstrips

Reference the document titled Recreational Aviation Foundation located at: 

Home - Recreational Aviation Foundation (theraf.org)
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

101

Appendix Table of Contents

1. BLM National Aviation Organization Directory

2. SES Flight Scheduling Guide

3. Latitude – Longitude Information

4. BLM SAFECOM Management Roles

5. OAS Aviation Program Evaluation Schedule

6. BLM Cargo Letdown Operations

7. BLM Fleet Aircraft Standard Operations Procedures

8. Acting vs. Point of Contact

9. Acronyms

10. OR/WA Law Enforcement Aviation Operations Supplement

11. District UAS Operations Supplement

12. District Mishap Response Plan and Checklist

13. District Aircrew Briefing Guide
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

102

Appendix 1 - BLM National Aviation Organization Directory

Position Name Duty Station E-Mail Office Number Cell Number

Division Chief, Aviation (FA-500) vacant Boise, ID (208) 387-5448 (208)

Deputy Division Chief, Aviation Glen Claypool Boise, ID gclaypoo@blm.gov (208) 387-5160 (208) 859-7506

SEAT Program Manager Kristina Curtis Boise, ID kcurtis@blm.gov 208-387-5441 208-850-2780

Flight Operations Manager, vacant

Helicopter Program Manager Mike Reid Boise, ID mreid@blm.gov 208-387-5173 208-994-1623

Aviation Safety/ Training Advisor Kirk Rothwell Boise, ID mrothwell@blm.gov (208) 387-5879 (208) 914-8483

UAS Program Manager Matt Dutton Boise, ID mdutton@blm.gov (208)-387-5325 (208) 484-8031

UAS Fleet Manager Bobby Eisele Boise, ID beisele@blm.gov (801) 814-1357

UAS Specialist Jay Murgoitio Boise, ID jmurgoitio@blm.gov 208-387-5334

Air Tactical Pilot, Bravo 5 Andre Mascheroni McCall, ID amascheroni@blm.gov (208) 630-3771

Air Tactical Pilot, Bravo 4 Paul Lenmark Dillon, MT plenmark@blm.gov (406) 660-0257

Aviation Staff Assistant Andrea Vigil Boise, ID avigil@blm.gov (208) 387-5180

Air Tactical Pilot, Bravo 9 Lisa Allen Boise, ID lmallen@blm.gov (208) 387-5197 (208) 972-1677

Air Tactical Supervisor Ivan Smith Boise, ID ismith@blm.gov (208) 387-5872 (208) 859-9524

Smokejumper Pilot Bob McCormick Boise, ID rmcormick@blm.gov 907-356-5763

Smokejumper Pilot vacant

Pilot Hans Germann Boise, ID hgermann@blm.gov 208-850-1946

Developmental Pilot Chris Swisher Fairbanks, AK cswisher@blm.gov 907-370-3113

Air Tactical Program Manager Jed Johns Boise, ID jjohns@blm.gov (208) 387-5140 208-871-7535

SEAT Coordinator Angie Forbes Boise, ID aforbes@blm.gov (208) 387-5419 208-954-2072

Ramp Services Supervisor Tony Lolli Boise, ID alolli@blm.gov (208) 387-5529
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

103

Appendix 2 - SES Flight Scheduling Guide

These flights are typically requested through the SAM however some of the responsibilities may 

be delegated to UAMs (refer to applicable State Aviation Plan for specifics).

The OAS-110 will be utilized as the parent or cover document for additional pages of 

documentation. Additional information regarding SES flight scheduling to include OPM-7 and 

OAS-110 Form is located at: https://www.doi.gov/aviation/library/opm

1. Gather information needed to develop the flight plan and OAS-110.

• Determine the nature of flight. Is it-point-to-point, mission, special use, etc.

• Determine the proposed itinerary/schedule requirements.

• Determine any special needs: security, dual-pilot crew, etc.

• Assess and consider any travel schedule time limitations for SES employees and time 

needed to accomplish objectives.

• Names, passenger and baggage weights, salaries. (If only annual salaries are 

available, multiply that number by 1.2 and divide by 2087 to derive the approximate 

hourly salary.)

2. Notify solicitor of impending request (courtesy call) at least a week to ten days prior to the 

proposed flight.

3. Conduct research and document cost estimate for the elements in each of these three 

options.

a. Scheduled commercial air carrier (not applicable for mission flights)

• Use only contract travel agency quotes to determine airfare estimates.

• Does itinerary meet time frame requirements?

• Cost of airfare and booking fees

• Cost of rental car from airport to meeting location

• Additional lodging and per diem costs incurred if traveling by airline

• Total employee salaries for time spent in travel status. (Add one hour of 

preflight airport time to the flight time, plus time spent driving rental car to 

location where fleet or charter aircraft would have otherwise flown to any 

locations not served by airlines.)

b. Fleet Aircraft

• Confirm if fleet aircraft are even available within reasonable distance.

• Include ferry flight time and standby costs with passenger transport flight time 

estimate.

• Document total salaries for employee’s time spent flying on fleet aircraft.

c. Charter Operators

• Use only established contract vendors with carded pilots and aircraft capable 

of carrying the required passenger manifest and weight.

• Compare two or more competing vendors using the AQD-91 form; maintain 

documentation in local files and use the best-value vendor in the OAS-110

cost analysis.

• Include ferry flight costs, guaranteed time, and standby rates (if applicable) in 

cost estimate.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

104

4. Determine the cost for each of the three options above and document on the OAS-110.

Document and forward an explanation why any of the three options was not considered 

possible or reasonable. Examples:

• Proposed flight is a reconnaissance mission that can’t be performed by scheduled air 

carriers.

• Scheduled airline service cannot meet SES employee time constraints or schedule or

would incur additional days in travel status. (Forward itinerary and additional salaries 

that would be incurred to illustrate infeasibility.)

5. Forward the completed OAS-110 and attached documentation to the Solicitor through the 

SAM, or with courtesy copy sent to the SAM (refer to specific State Aviation policy).

6. Be sure a qualified Flight Manager is assigned to tend to the safety requirements and 

administrative details associated with the flight.

7. A Project Aviation Safety Plan (PASP) should be developed for all SES Mission Flights, 

even those deemed to be “one-time, non-complex.” A 9400-1a (or equivalent) may be 

used as a supplemental manifest and flight tracking device on point-to-point flights.

8. The SAM will report any SES flight hours to the NAO twice each year (October 1 and 

April 1).
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

105

Appendix 3 - Latitude/ Longitude Information

If coordinates are wrong...

• Risk/danger/liability goes up

• Calculations become erroneous (weight/distance/fuel ratios)

• People can’t find the “right” spot

• Data goes onto maps in the wrong place

• We look bad as an organization, a unit, an individual

• Contractors/pilots become angry/confused/frustrated 

and loss trust in our dispatching system.

Latitude

• Parallel east-west lines

• Measures 90o North and 90o South of equator

Longitude

• Lines run south to north.

• Measures east and west of the prime meridian

• Lines converge at North and South poles

Common Formats

Format Example

Decimal Degrees 

(DDD.DDDDD o) 

64.84052o N by 147.60437o W 

Degrees and Decimal 

Minutes (DDD o MM.MMM’)

64o 50.431’ N by W 147o

36.262’ W 

Degrees, Minutes and 

Seconds (DDD o MM’ SS.S”)

64o 50’ 25.5” N by W 147o 36’

15.5” W 

Notation

Degrees o

Minutes ’ 

Seconds ” 

Decimal . 

Hemisphere N, S, E, W or - 

On-line Calculators for converting between Formats: 

https://rechneronline.de/geo-coordinates/ 

http://www.calculatorcat.com/latitude_longitude.phtml

GPS Datums

• Datums define the origin and orientation of latitude/longitude lines

• Describing a place by lat/long is not good enough. The datum must also be stated.

• Changing the datum changes the lat/long of a point on the surface of the Earth

• There are hundreds of different Datums, agencies use different Datums.

• Referencing lat/long coordinates to the wrong datum can result in position errors of 

hundreds of meters
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

106

Know your agency’s standard Format and Datum

• BLM Aviation (Degrees and Decimal Minutes, WGS84)

• BLM GIS (Various)

• TFRs (Degrees, Minutes and Seconds, WGS84). US NOTAM OFFICE FORMAT 

ddmmssN/dddmmssW

• BLM Fire (Degrees and Decimal Minutes, WGS84)

• FAA Temporary Flight Restrictions (Degrees, Minutes and Seconds). US NOTAM 

OFFICE FORMAT ddmmssN/dddmmssW

Remember...

• Use only ONE period/decimal point when writing a latitude or longitude in Decimal 

Degrees, or Degrees, Decimal Minutes.

• Do NOT use periods/decimal points for degrees or minutes when writing a latitude or 

longitude in Degrees, Minutes and Seconds

• There can NEVER be more than 60 seconds in Degrees, Minutes and Seconds format

• Do NOT mix formats

• Know and use proper Datum
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

107

Appendix 4 - BLM SAFECOM Management Roles

POSITION AUTHORITY RESPONSIBILITIES CRITICAL NOTES

Individual Submission Fills out the SAFECOM form, completing all required fields including initial 

determination of Operational Control. Completes the Original Text in both 

the Narrative and Corrective Action fields. Consults with mission personnel

prior to submitting electronically to OAS, courtesy notification to UAM.

Fill out completely and accurately. 

Report only the facts. Narratives should 

be brief and concise.

BLM UAM Submission

E-Mail 

Notification

Corrective 

Actions

If only a hardcopy has been submitted, submits electronically to OAS.

Receives e-mail notification of all initial, modified and completed 

SAFECOMs identifying their BLM Field Office as having operational control.

Takes corrective action at the local level and describes these actions in the 

Public Text area of the Corrective Action field. Include your Job Title (do not 

enter personal information)

X

Provide feedback to person submitting 

(unless anonymous)

Must treat all corrective action 

descriptions as if they were public.

BLM State 

Aviation 

Manager

E-Mail 

Notification

Corrective 

Actions

Modify Actions

Operational 

Control

Category 

Make Public

Receives e-mail notification of all initial, corrective action, modified, and 

completed SAFECOMs identifying BLM operational control within their State.

Review all information. May take and document additional corrective actions.

Authority to change all SAFECOM information (except for name of the 

submitter and the original narrative).

Make final determination of the Agency, State/Region and Field Unit that has 

Operational Control.

Select or edit the appropriate category to classify the SAFECOM.

Copies Original Text into the Public Text area for both the Narrative and 

Corrective Action fields. Sanitizes the Public Text. Makes the SAFECOM 

“Public” (if overly sensitive, consult with NAO before making public)

Coordinate with UAM.

X

Coordinate with UAM. Verify and amend 

all info for accuracy.

Determines who will receive e-mail 

notification.

Multiple categories possible. 

Ensures all Public Text is sanitized in

Narrative & Corrective Action fields prior 

to making public. SAM determines who 

makes “public” within their state.

BLM

National 

Aviation 

Safety 

Advisor

E-Mail 

Notification

Corrective 

Actions

Modify

Actions 

Make Public

Completion

Distribution

Designates 

Users

Out of Agency

Receives e-mail notification of all initial, corrective action, modified, and 

completed SAFECOMs nationwide that identify BLM operational control.

Takes additional corrective actions, if necessary, and documents on the 

SAFECOM.

Authority to change all SAFECOM information (except for name of submitter 

and the original narrative).

Has the authority to sanitize information and make the SAFECOM “public” (if 

not already done at the State level). Coordinates with OAS.

Has the authority to make the SAFECOM “complete”.

Distributes all “Public” BLM SAFECOMs to BLM SAMs and Other Agencies.

Authority to identify all BLM users and their appropriate permission levels. 

Must notify OAS of additional users/changes/updates.

Authorized to review another agency “Public” SAFECOMs. Read Only!

Coordinate with SAM. 

Coordinate with SAM 

X 

Ensures all Public Text is sanitized in 

Narrative & Corrective Action fields prior 

to making public.

X

Coordinates with OAS. 

Coordinates with SAM and OAS.

X

Elevated 

SAFECOM

All Actions

Make Public

OAS or NAO recommends SAFECOM be elevated. NAO-Safety retains 

control of Elevated SAFECOM and coordinates with SAM for proposed 

action. Coordination will take place with the SAM to gather detailed 

documentation.

NAO-Safety will make SAFECOM public with concurrence of SAM. Pictures, 

reports and sensitive material may or may not be made public but will be 

accessible to those with modify access.

Action may include lessons learned 

write up, safety alert etc. Important to 

follow up with Contracting Officer 

through the chain of command if aircraft 

or personnel are not meeting contract 

specifications.

Elevated SAFECOMs will not be made 

“Public” until investigation has been 

completed.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

108

Appendix 5 - OAS Aviation Program Evaluation Schedule

2022 – Idaho, Montana, Eastern States 

2023 – Alaska, Arizona

2024 – New Mexico, Wyoming 

2025 – Colorado, California 

2026 – NAO, Nevada

2027 – Oregon/ Washington, Utah 

2028 – Idaho, Montana, Eastern States
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

109

Appendix 6 - BLM Cargo Letdown Operations

1.1 Purpose

Cargo Letdown is a procedure used to lower cargo out of a hovering helicopter to the ground 

with the use of a lowering line and rappel anchor. This procedure is used by helitack programs to 

get needed equipment and supplies to the ground when conventional methods are not the most 

efficient option.

1.2 Approval

National BLM approval is required to host a cargo letdown program. Requests for approval are 

initiated by a state office to the National Aviation Office (NAO) with final approval from the 

Division Chief, Aviation.

NAO approval may allow for both internal and external (off the hook) cargo letdown operations. 

Initial approval will be based upon indicated need and limited to one field season. Subsequent 

conditional approval must be requested after the initial field season and validated based on 

proper utilization and justification of continued need. Approved cargo letdown programs will be 

re-evaluated in conjunction with new helicopter contract solicitations. Several administrative 

procedures need to be addressed as part of the request for approval:

• Initial justification to include nomination of Helicopter Cargo Letdown Spotter Trainee 

candidates (HCLS (T)).

• Request for Contract Modification from NAO to Contracting Officer (CO) to: 

o Provide for a contractor purchased cargo letdown anchor. Costs to the contractor 

would be recovered in an adjusted Daily Availability rate negotiated by the CO.

o Add additional “Special Pilot Requirements for Cargo Letdown” language.

• Cargo Letdown Operations Plan. This plan is a supplement to the Helibase Operations 

Plan. The Cargo Letdown plan should describe all aspects of the letdown program to 

include:

o Risk Management mitigation measures: Cargo Let Down (CLD) Risk Assessment

/ Hazard Identification (CLD RA) 

o Decision Matrix (under what parameters will this operation be conducted).

o Detailed operational procedures.

o Detailed equipment and configuration descriptions.

o Equipment certification/inspection/retirement intervals and documentation.

o Personnel training, experience and proficiency requirements and record-keeping

o Letdown mission documentation and record-keeping.

o Year-end statistical data on form “BLM Annual Helitack Data”. The form is 

available for download on the BLM NAO website.

o Completed copies of the BLM Cargo Letdown Spotter Trainee Qualification 

Record will be sent to the BLM State Aviation Manager and BLM Helicopter 

Program Manager annually.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

110

The NAO will aid in arranging for Pilot and HCLS(T) certification as well as help with obtaining 

required equipment.

1.3 Cargo Letdown Spotter Eligibility

Eligibility for BLM Cargo Letdown Spotter is limited to qualified Helicopter Managers on Exclusive 

Use Helitack crews at the squad leader level or above. In addition, CLD Spotters must meet the 

following requirements:

• Meet the prerequisite experience, training, and currency requirements outlined in the 

Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations “Exclusive Use Fire 

Helicopter Position Requisites” for the position they encumber.

• Any deviation from these requirements must be approved in writing by the State Aviation 

Manager with a courtesy notification to the NAO Helicopter Program Manager.

1.3.1 Cargo Letdown Spotter Initial Training

Initial cargo letdown training shall be conducted by a DOI Office of Aviation Services (OAS) 

training specialist or a fully qualified Spotter (HERS/HCLS). The DOI OAS training specialist or 

cargo/rappel check Spotter is responsible for conducting the final initial check ride and 

certification of a HCLS(T).

When coordinating for and during training it is important that clear communications are 

maintained between the designee trainers (if utilized), the DOI OAS training specialist and the 

BLM Helicopter Program Manager.

Each component of training (tower, mock-up, and live helicopter) must allow sufficient time to 

satisfy the training requirements; this may vary based on the number of and progression of 

students. Requesting unit and trainees must be prepared to commit to the necessary time frames 

and associated expense when entering into agreement with Trainers.

This training is performance based and trainees will only move forward as specific training 

targets are met. It must be understood that there is the potential that a selected trainee may not 

be qualified due to inadequate performance.

Tower training (if utilized) can be generic. Mock-ups and live cargo letdown training shall be 

helicopter model specific to the aircraft utilized by the trainee and will follow the current model 

specific cargo letdown procedures in this appendix.

All trainees will utilize the attached “BLM Cargo Letdown Spotter Trainee Qualification Record” to 

ensure all aspects of training are complete. This record shall include further training 

recommendations and a clear picture of the trainee’s current level of competence.

1.3.2 Cargo Letdown Spotter Refresher Training

Each year a Spotter must attend or instruct an annual helicopter cargo letdown training, as well 

as complete deployment of three loads of cargo from the helicopter to the satisfaction of the 

appropriate agency certifying official.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

111

Subsequent re-qualification certification may be conducted by a qualified Spotter (USFS or DOI). 

Typical terrain shall be utilized for at least one of the three loads.

1.3.3 Cargo Letdown Spotter Proficiency

To maintain Spotter proficiency Individuals must make at least one cargo letdown spot every 14 

days. If a helicopter letdown is not completed within 14 days, the Spotter may use a simulation.

If a simulation is used to maintain proficiency during the 14-day period, an airborne deployment 

must be done in the following 14-day period.

1.4 Cargo Letdown Check Spotter

To be considered for approval as Helicopter Cargo Letdown Check Spotter (HCCS), the trainee 

must:

• Be nominated by the State Aviation Manager to the National Helicopter Program 

Manager.

• Be a current helitack supervisor or assistant on an exclusive use helitack crew.

• Must have been a qualified spotter for two (2) years

• Must have assisted in training of at least two (2) cargo letdown spotters

• Meet the prerequisite experience, training, and currency requirements outlined in the 

Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations “Exclusive Use Fire 

Helicopter Position Requisites”.

• Subsequent yearly self-certification is subject the HCCS completing annual recurrent 

training with State Aviation Manager concurrence.

Annual Check Spotter Currency

• Each Cargo Letdown check spotter must maintain currency and proficiency as a cargo 

letdown spotter

1.5 Pilot Experience, Training, and Currency Requirements

Pilots must meet all the following requirements:

• Meet the appropriate requirements of the procurement document to include having 

logged additional experience as pilot-in-command as follows:

o 50 hours -- Total hours in make, model and series offered.

o 25 hours -- Rappel, cargo letdown or long line requiring precision placement, last 

12 months.

• Annually attend a cargo letdown training/refresher training session. This training must be 

conducted and documented by a qualified Spotter and will include:

o Briefing and familiarization on letdown bracket and hard points for the specific 

model.

o Seating arrangements for cargo and Spotters.

o Cargo placement/location and deployment sequence and method.

o Exit procedures and sequence.

o Perform a minimum of six ground mockups in the aircraft model to be used, 

including rigging the aircraft for cargo letdown mission and deploying cargo.

o Briefing on any peculiarities of the specific model.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

112

o Demonstrate ability to operate helicopter during three cargo letdown sequences.

o Demonstrate ability to work with Spotter.

Upon meeting the above requirements, the pilot may be approved for helicopter cargo letdown 

operations by an OAS or USFS helicopter inspector pilot. The pilot must maintain currency in 

helicopter cargo letdown at the same frequency required of the Spotter (every 14 days). If 

currency is not maintained a mockup and proficiency flight must be completed prior to any actual 

operational mission.

The helicopter must meet the requirements of the departmental manual and the procurement 

document.

1.6 Cargo Letdown Equipment

Any equipment that a unit wishes to test or incorporate into cargo letdown must be reviewed by the BLM 

representative to the Interagency Helicopter Rappel Unit (i.e., use of rope, throw bag, and lowering device).

NOTE: Any equipment item with time life criteria of 10 years must be removed from service once 

it meets that time limitation. If manufacture date stamps for equipment become illegible, 

damaged, or lost, they will be replaced and then documented in the applicable equipment log.

Replacement tags must correspond with the original manufacture date in the equipment log. Any 

equipment with a time life limitation that cannot be age verified must be removed. Equipment 

removed from service will be disposed of in accordance with Bureau of Land Management 

Personal Property Management Manual 1520.

1.6.1 Gloves

The Sullivan PV or PVG, PMI GL2200x rappel glove, and the Metolius climbing 3⁄4 finger glove 

are approved for cargo letdown operation. The Metolius glove shall only be used in conjunction 

with a flight glove.

1.6.2 Spotter Harness

Cargo Letdown Spotters will utilize a harness the meets the requirements of the ALSE Handbook 

that has a frontal attachment point (i.e., Yates 388, or ARS 338 Heli Ops Harness) during all 

helicopter cargo letdown and tower operations. The harness shall be issued and tagged with a 

unique identifier that corresponds to an in-service date. Harness tags from the manufacturer may 

be used.

The Harness will be inspected in accordance with manufacturers requirements. In addition:

• The Spotter harness must be inspected by the user prior to operation.

• Inspect stitching and webbing for abrasion, wear, or other damage.

• Check leg strap buckles, chest strap buckles, l D-rings and Cam Buckle adjusters for 

correct adjustment and function.

• Check connectors for correct function.

1.6.3 Adjustable Spotter Lanyard

The adjustable lanyard is the interface between the spotter harness attachment point and 

approved helicopter hard point or anchor attachment point. Commercially produced adjustable 

lanyards must be utilized that are certified to National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1983, 

EN, or American National Standards Institute (ANSI Z359). Examples: Petzl® Grillon Plus,
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

113

Petzl® Grillon International®, Yates® 571-DMM Rappel Master Adjustable Lanyard w/Shock 

Stop and DMM Captive Eye Carabiners.

The harness lanyard must adjust to prevent the attachment point from extending past the door 

plane of the helicopter. A connector is attached to the free end of the spotter lanyard connecting 

to an STC or manufacturer approved helicopter hard point, tower hard point, or other approved 

tether attachment point.

When a lanyard is adjusted to allow access beyond the door plane, it is considered a reportable 

event. The SAFECOM system will be used for facilitated learning purposes.

Inspection:

• Lanyard is inspected with spotter harness prior to operation.

• Inspect stitching and webbing for abrasion, wear, or other damage.

• Metal hardware should be free from cracks, dings, or other damage.

1.6.4 Cargo Letdown Spotter Tether Attachment

Cargo Letdown Spotter Tether (Lanyard) Attachment(s) will be manufactured in accordance with 

drawing # MTDC-946, or the Air Rescue Systems® Primary Anchor. The spotter tether 

attachment will secure the spotter harness tether to the aircraft. The spotter tether attachment 

will be installed in the aircraft according to model specific requirements.

Inspection:

• Inspected by a Spotter prior to each use.

• Inspect stitching and webbing for abrasion, wear, or other damage.

• Metal adjusters and attachment ring should be free from cracks, dings, or other damage.

• Meets lifetime criteria in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications.

1.6.5 Carabiners and Connectors

Carabiners and connectors used in cargo letdown operations will meet the requirements of 

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1983 General Use, 2012 or most recent edition, or 

American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z359.12 2009, or most recent edition.

Exception: Carabiners specifically identified by an FAA Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) for 

direct attachment to an anchor.

Inspection:

• Inspect in accordance with manufactures data sheet

• Inspect to be sure that gates and locking mechanism function properly. If gate becomes 

sticky, remove from service.

• Look for abrasion, burrs, or rough edges. If there is any visual indication that raises 

question, retire it.

• When using for cargo letdown operations make certain that gates are locked when in use 

and that tension is not on gate.

• Are not dropped on ground or hard surface. Rough handling is avoided.

• Kept clean.

• Inspected by a Spotter prior to each use.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

114

1.6.6 Knife / Knife Sheaths

Spotters are required to have a hook knife, with lanyard, readily accessible for emergency use. 

The Raptor® knife or Gerber®Vital Zip with Seber Blade is required for use by cargo letdown 

Spotters. The Spotter Raptor® knife must be enclosed within the MTDC rappel Spotter Raptor® 

sheath (MTDC drawing # 1042) and attached to the Spotter harness in the manner shown in 

rappel bulletin 051005.

Certain STC’s for rappel anchor installations require an additional Raptor knife be installed inside 

the aircraft.

Inspection:

• Knife sheaths are to be inspected with any harness inspection.

• Knives shall be inspected annually or prior to being installed on a harness. Ensure knives 

used for rappel have properly installed blades.

• Knife blades must be changed after any use.

• Handle/body of knife should be free from damage, screws should be tight.

• The sheath should be in good condition.

• Ensure the lanyard is stowed and attached correctly.

• Pull snap(s) should close/open with enough resistance to prevent inadvertent opening.

1.6.7 Rappel Plate Anchors

Rappel anchors are evaluated for use by OAS for DOI. Each helicopter model will be evaluated 

for anchor hard points and design to determine the proper rappel bracket or brackets that may be 

used.

Inspection:

• Rappel Anchor inspection will occur in accordance with the applicable STC, continuing 

airworthiness instructions, or manufacturers standards in the flight manual or 

maintenance manual. In addition, an annual inspection shall also be conducted.

• The designer or manufacturer of the anchor is responsible for developing maintenance 

inspection criteria, which ensures the continued airworthiness of the anchor. The owner 

of the anchor is responsible for ensuring that the inspection(s) is conducted. Prior to each 

use, the rappel anchor will be visually inspected by the Spotter for general condition and 

documented on the daily diary.

• Additional information regarding existing rappel anchors is available from MTDC.

1.6.8 Figure 8 with ears

For BLM cargo letdown operations, the steel or aluminum CMC rescue 8 with ears is the 

approved letdown device.

Inspection:

• Inspect in accordance with manufactures data sheet
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

115

• Inspect for grooves developing or flaking occurring in aluminum figure 8's. When a groove 

develops beyond the anodized surface of the aluminum figure 8, wear will rapidly occur. If 

the groove is beyond 1/16-inch deep, the figure 8 must be retired.

• Inspect the figure 8 for aluminum flaking. The flaking develops rough edges that could 

cause excessive wear on the line. If flaking is evident, remove the figure 8 from service. 

Although the acquisition cost is higher than other models, steel figure 8's have proven 

more durable and service life is considerably longer than aluminum. However, steel may 

cause heat damage more easily because it does not dissipate heat as readily as 

aluminum.

• Inspect for cracks or breaks. If cracks are evident, retire figure 8.

• Figure 8’s must be inspected by a Spotter prior to each use.

• Take care to avoid rough handling; do not drag or drop on ground and keep the device 

clean.

1.6.9 Cargo Letdown Line

To maintain even wear and maximize each lines useful life, line ends will be rotated after each 

use. To track line use, each end shall be marked A or B.

Let-down lines are available in lengths of 250ft or 300 ft. Both let-down lines shall conform to MilW-5625K Webbing, Textile, Nylon, Tubular, 3⁄4”. Webbing conforming to this standard has a 

minimum breaking strength of 2300lbs.

Let-down lines 250 feet in length will be of white tubular nylon webbing and conform to drawing 

#MTDC-983.

Let-down lines of 300 ft. will be of yellow tubular nylon webbing and conform to drawing #MTDC983.

Accordion packs will be constructed as to easily identify a 250 ft. let-down line from a 300 ft. letdown line. Accordion packs for 250 ft. let-down lines will be constructed of white cotton duck 

cloth, and accordion packs for 300 ft. let-down lines will be made from white cotton duck cloth 

with yellow seam tape.

To further identify accordion packs, 1-inch stencils will be used to mark the outside surface of 

accordion packs with the length of let-down line to be used with each size accordion pack. 250 ft. 

Accordion Packs will conform to drawing #MTDC-974 and 300 ft Accordion Packs will conform to 

drawing number #MTDC-1037. Both lines will be packed in accordance with the Wildland Fire 

Helicopter Rappel Cargo Letdown Accordion Pack video produced by MTDC. Edge Protection 

may be necessary along helicopter door edge or helicopter skids to prevent abrasion of the line.

• 250-foot line: White 3⁄4” tubular nylon webbing, dyed appropriately, with stenciled 

accordion pack.

• 300-foot line: Yellow 3⁄4’ tubular nylon webbing, dyed appropriately, with stenciled 

accordion pack
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

116

Inspection:

• Let-down lines will be inspected for wear and burns after cargo deployment, and ends 

reversed for the next let-down sequence.

• Inspect stitching and webbing for abrasion, wear, cuts, chemical contamination, or

other damage.

Marking:

• A twenty-five-foot section from each end of the let-down lines shall be clearly marked in 

red and a ten-foot section in the center of the line should be marked with a contrasting 

color.

• Use only Rit dye to mark lines.

1.6.10 Let-Down Containers

Bags are to be manufactured with high strength abrasion-resistant materials. The attachment 

points on the bag must be reinforced to ensure there is not a failure during deployment. Sources 

for approved cargo letdown containers are also listed on the USFS rappel website. Maximum 

allowable suspended weight per internal cargo let down container shall be 125 lbs. Approved 

cargo let down containers shall pass a static strength test with no failure or ruptured stitches 

when loaded to a minimum weight of 468.75 lbs. (safety factor of 3.75 to 1).

Internal cargo letdown containers shall consist of the following:

• Cardboard box with harness, the cardboard box shall consist of double wall construction 

and shall be certified by manufacturer as having passed Edge Crush Test of 71 pounds 

(71-ECT). Cargo boxes must be girded with an approved box harness for deployment.

• The box harness and attachment hardware shall have a minimum tensile strength of 

1125 lbs.

• Metolius style haul bag.

• Large Klamath Bag.

• Small Klamath Bag.

External cargo letdown containers shall consist of the following: 

• Tuna Net (NFES #000795).

• Metolius style haul bag.

• Large Klamath Bag.

• Small Klamath Bag.

The maximum weight and the minimum weight for the large and small Klamath bags will be 

stenciled on the container with 3-inch letters in a high contrast color.

The limitations will be illustrated on opposing sides of the container.

Maximum weight and minimum weight for external cargo deployment containers.

• Large Klamath Bag

o Maximum Weight: 300 lbs.

o Minimum Weight: 150 lbs.

• Small Klamath Bag

o Maximum Weight: 300 lbs.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

117

o Minimum Weight: 80 lbs.

• Tuna Net

o Maximum Weight: 300 lbs.

o Minimum Weight: 40 lbs.

Bags and other containers should be frequently inspected and not used if damaged.

During flight testing of external containers, loads became unstable above 60 knots indicated 

airspeed. External load operations shall be conducted at an airspeed that ensures the load 

remain stable.

1.6.11 External Cargo Deployment (Break-away strap and Cargo Strap)

For external cargo deployment the break-away strap which is the connecting line between the 

external load or cargo strap and cargo let down line shall conform to Mil-W-5625K and be 1” 

tubular nylon. The minimum breaking strength of 1” tubular is 4000 lbs. External cargo 

operations shall use the model specific Break Away and Cargo Straps manufactured in 

accordance with drawing # MTDC 980 Helicopter Rappel External Cargo Break Away strap and 

drawing # MTDC 982 Helicopter Rappel External Cargo Strap.

Inspection:

• Equipment will be inspected prior to use by a qualified Spotter.

• Inspect stitching and webbing for abrasion, wear, cuts, chemical contamination, or

other damage.

1.6.12 Figure 8 Extender

Relocates the Figure 8 away from an aircraft hardpoint. Figure 8 extender conforms to MTDC 

Drawing # 1040.

Inspection:

• Equipment will be inspected prior to use by a qualified Spotter.

• Inspect stitching and webbing for abrasion, wear, cuts, chemical contamination, or

other damage.

1.6.13 External Cargo Swivel

All external cargo-letdown loads must be attached to the helicopter with an approved swivel.

The Petzl P58 S, P58 L and swivels approved for cargo in the ISHO are the approved swivels for 

external cargo letdown operations.

Inspection:

• Inspect in accordance with manufactures data sheet,

• Equipment will be inspected prior to use by a qualified Spotter.

• Spinning action of the swivel,

• Physical damage

• Inspection criteria as outlined in chapter 9 of NSHO approved equipment.

1.7 Cargo Letdown Documentation

For fire operations, copies of certifying and recertifying documentation will be maintained in
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

118

individual permanent records and forwarded to the Incident Qualifications Certification Systems 

(IQCS) Account Manager. All documentation logs are official documents and will be kept 

electronically or in hard copy format.

1.7.1 Cargo Letdown Spotter

The Helicopter Cargo Letdown Spotter Qualification Record will document each individual step in 

the training. Competency at each level of the training must be demonstrated by the trainee 

before the Spotter will permit advancement to the next step. Each Spotter will maintain a record 

of training, proficiency and operational cargo letdowns in a unit log or other format.

1.7.2 Equipment Logs

All equipment requiring documentation will be assigned a unique identification number. The 

number will be retired with the piece of equipment. The following equipment must have a log 

assigned: Spotter Harness, Cargo Letdown Line, and Rappel Tower Anchor.

1.7.3 Spotter Harness

Harness will be inspected annually and recorded. Any deficiencies during pre-use inspections 

and/or repairs or component replacement will be noted on the harness log or the electronic 

equivalent.

1.7.4 Cargo Letdown Line

All cargo letdown line use must be documented. After inspection, any irregularities will be 

noted. Use the Letdown Line Log or electronic equivalent.

1.7.5 Rappel Tower Anchor

Use and inspection of rappel tower anchors must be documented. The forms will provide at a 

minimum the information listed below.

• Date put in service

• ID number

• Remarks/problems

• Inspector’s name/date inspected

1.8 Internal Cargo Deployment Procedures

All training and actual deployment missions will use the following steps and procedures. The 

intent is to standardize and maintain continuity between units.

1.8.1 Pre-Flight Duties for Cargo Only Missions

• Prior to departure, the pilot(s) and involved personnel shall receive a briefing on mission 

objectives, communications, known hazards, and emergency procedures.

• Load calculations and manifests complete and posted.

• Spotter puts on harness, ensures raptor knife is attached to harness.

• Spotter completes necessary pre-flight inspections.

1.8.2 Equipment Check of Spotter

Prior to flight, the Spotter must receive a Spotter equipment check. When ground personnel are 

unavailable, the Spotter shall have the pilot perform this check. Positive communication between 

the Spotter and pilot must occur to ensure Spotter has attached their tether to an approved hard 

point.

• Flight Helmet
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

119

o Good Condition - no cracks or damage, avionics in place

o Eye protection

o Chin strap secured, adjusted to fit snuggly, with no loose ends

• Nomex Shirt/Flight Suit

o Good condition, shirt tucked in collar up, buttoned to the top, flight suit fully zipped 

up

o Sleeves rolled down covering arms (no holes, clean & tight at wrist)

• Gloves

o Gloves in good condition, fastened with no loose ends, and free of pitch or 

contaminants

• Harness – Front Side

o Risers

 Visible webbing & stitching in good condition

 No twists, buckles secured with no cracks, keepers in place

o Chest Strap

 Positioned mid-chest

 Buckled & snuggly fit

o Leg Straps

 Buckles attached; no fabric caught

 Visible webbing & stitching in good condition

 No twists, snug fit, loose ends secured, keepers in place

o Raptor Knife

 Secured in sheath on left riser

 Horn facing to left side

 Lanyard stowed

• Nomex & Boots

o Nomex pants/flight suit in good condition, no Velcro showing

o Pant cuffs over approved boots

Indicate Spotter to turn around with a tap on the left shoulder.

• Spotter’s Back Side

o Helmet in good condition

o Collar up

o Harness - visible webbing & stitching in good condition with no twists

o Spotter tether attached to dorsal O-Ring through double pass adjustor and tacked 

when using Miller Harness and MTDC specified tethers. Extendable tether 

stowed, all snaps in place, or Spotter tether attached to front or waist O-ring 

when utilizing a Yates 388 or ARS 338 Heli Ops Harness front or waist 

attachment

o Ensure carabiner or connector is in place at end of tether

o Buckles & loose ends secured

o Nomex shirt, pants or flight suit in good condition, no Velcro showing

o Pant cuffs over approved boots

Tap on shoulder to indicate Spotter to turn around.

• Exchange thumbs-up - “YOU ARE O.K., I AGREE”
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

120

1.8.3 Rigging and Loading Cargo

• Spotter will configure helicopter to meet the needs of the specific cargo mission.

• Rig cargo with carabiners and secure in helicopter. Cargo should be secured in 

accordance with model specific configurations in Appendix B

• Check cargo delivery equipment to ensure proper number of letdown lines, extra 

carabiners, and figure 8 are available and secured in accessible location.

• Spotter visually inspects anchor. (See Chapter 3, Rappel Anchor Inspection)

• Spotter boards aircraft, connects tether, plugs into avionics, and secures seatbelt.

• Spotter tells pilot, “Tether attached OK to depart,”

• Pilot responds, “Tether attached, departing.”

1.8.4 Pre-Cargo Delivery Sequence

• Pilot(s) flies a reconnaissance of the area to look for hazards and works with Spotter to 

select an appropriate cargo delivery site.

• Contact appropriate flight following authority (ATGS, HLCO, dispatch, etc.) prior to 

commencing the cargo operation. Spotter communicates with flight following authority & 

pilot regarding number of loads to be deployed.

• Inform ground personnel to stay clear of cargo during deployment.

• Adjust radios as needed to ensure pilot and Spotter communication will not be 

compromised by excessive radio chatter. Radios must remain on and dialed to the 

appropriate flight following frequency.

• Where possible helicopter should maintain at least 50 ft. clearance above any obstacles 

before starting a cargo operation.

• If this is not possible and helicopter must descend below the canopy, helicopter will 

operate within an opening no less than 1 1/2 times the main rotor diameter (e.g., an 

aircraft with a 36 ft. main rotor diameter would require a 54 ft. diameter opening).

• Before starting cargo operations, A HOGE Power assurance check is accomplished at an 

altitude comparable to the cargo site or greater. A positive rate of climb must be 

established without exceeding aircraft limitations. Pilot states “Hover established, positive 

rate of climb, power is good.”

• Spotter responds “Power is good”

• Spotter activates hot mic if not done already

• If not performed on the ground, Spotter rigs Figure 8 with cargo letdown line and attaches 

figure 8

o If using overhead bracket on a type III helicopter connect two (2) carabiners in 

anchor bracket, barrel down, gate facing inboard. Connect one (1) carabiner to 

the upper carabiners, barrel down, gate facing aft.

o If using floor bracket connect one (1) carabiner in anchor bracket, (barrel inboard, 

gate facing aft) with extender strap and one (1) additional carabiner attached to 

figure 8.

• Cargo letdown pack must be connected to a hard point.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

121

• Spotter removes restraining straps from cargo, ensure remaining cargo is secure, and 

positions cargo in doorway. Spotter relays to pilot when rigging is complete.

• Aircraft with sliding doors in the closed position will follow the procedures in the following 

three (3) bullets

o Pilot states to Spotter “Clear to open door(s)”.

o Spotter states to pilot, “Opening aircraft door(s)”. Once Spotter has opened 

aircraft door, Spotter states to pilot “Door open and locked”.

• Spotter finalizes proper position over cargo site. Using pilot’s perspective (left, right, 

forward, back, and up or down relative to altitude above the ground.)

1.8.5 Cargo Deployment Sequence

• Spotter will communicate with pilot regarding adequate main and tail rotor clearance, 

power assessments, and cargo spot status throughout the cargo operation. Using pilot’s 

perspective (left, right, forward, back, and up or down relative to altitude above the 

ground)

• Spotter states to pilot, “Cargo ready. How is the power?”

• Pilot “Powers good send cargo”.

• Spotter states to pilot, “Sending Cargo” then eases cargo out the door, over the flight step 

and skid (Bell 206L4 cargo goes between skids).

• Begin lowering cargo with positive control of letdown line; do not allow un-arrested 

descent of cargo. Keep pilot informed of actions and progress of cargo descent:

o “Cargo out the door”

o “Cargo halfway down”

o “Cargo on the ground”

• When cargo is on the ground, unhook figure 8 from carabiner/Anchor and remove 

letdown line. Hold slack in line to prevent billowing and unhook letdown line bag from 

hard point. Wrap excess letdown line around bag and throw clear of aircraft.

• Inform pilot if more cargo is to be lowered. Pilot/Spotter will determine whether to hold 

hover or orbit area until cargo is ready for subsequent deployment.

• When cargo deployment is complete Spotter states to pilot, “Lines are away, clear to 

depart.”

• Pilot responds, “Lines away, clear to depart”.

• Spotter closes doors (if necessary), returns to seat, and fastens seatbelt.

• Radio returned to normal operational mode and flight following authority is informed that 

cargo operation has been completed.

1.9 External Cargo Deployment Procedures

All training and actual deployment missions will use the following steps and procedures. The 

intent is to standardize and maintain continuity between units.

1.9.1 Pre-Flight Duties for Cargo Only Missions

• Prior to departure, the pilot(s) and involved personnel shall receive a briefing on mission 

objectives, communications, known hazards, and emergency procedures.

• Load calculations and manifests complete and posted.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

122

• Spotter puts on harness, ensures safety knife is attached to harness.

• Spotter completes necessary pre-flight inspections.

• Prior to flight, the Spotter must receive a Spotter equipment check (see Internal Cargo 

Deployment Procedures above). When ground personnel are unavailable, the Spotter 

shall have the pilot perform this check. Positive communication between the Spotter and 

pilot must occur to ensure Spotter has attached their tether to an approved hard point.

1.9.2 Rigging and Loading Cargo

• Loaded cargo container is set up in the front of the helicopter.

• Attach one end of the cargo strap to the cargo container and the other end to the swivel

o External cargo must be attached to the belly hook, utilizing approved equipment.

• Spotter performs all appropriate hook checks, attaches single hard loop end of 

breakaway strap to the top end of the swivel hardware, and then connects swivel system 

and cargo to helicopter cargo hook.

• Rig letdown line through figure 8 and attach a carabiner to the hard loop on the free end 

of the line.

• Anchor

o Overhead Anchor: Attach the rigged figure 8 to the overhead anchor carabiners 

with a third carabiner barrel down, gate facing aft. Once complete, pull the free 

end of the line and carabiner down to the floor and attach to the Velcro® loop on 

the breakaway strap. Spotter must secure the breakaway strap attached to the 

carabiner during flight. (Add drawing or a photo)

o Floor anchor: Attach the rigged figure 8 with extender strap to the forward attach 

point on of the floor anchor, typically the opposite side of the pilot. Attach locking 

carabiner on rigged letdown line to the Velcro® loop on the breakaway strap.

• Lock off letdown line on figure 8.

• Cargo letdown pack must be connected to an appropriate hard point.

• Spotter connects tether, plugs into avionics, completes necessary external cargo checks, 

boards aircraft, and secures seatbelt.

• Spotter tells pilot, “Tether attached, load on the hook, OK to depart,”

• Pilot Responds, “Tether attached, load on the hook, departing.”

1.9.3 Pre-Cargo Delivery Sequence

• Pilot(s) flies a reconnaissance of the area to look for hazards and works with Spotter to 

select an appropriate cargo delivery site.

• Contact appropriate flight following authority (ATGS, HLCO, dispatch, etc.) prior to 

commencing the cargo operation. Spotter communicates with flight following authority & 

pilot regarding number of loads to be deployed.

• Inform ground personnel to stay clear of cargo during deployment.

• Adjust radios as needed to ensure pilot and Spotter communication will not be 

compromised by excessive radio chatter. Radios must remain on and dialed to the 

appropriate flight following frequency.

• Where possible helicopter should maintain at least 50ft. clearance above any obstacles 

before starting a cargo operation.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

123

• If this is not possible and helicopter must descend below the canopy, helicopter will 

operate within an opening no less than 1 1/2 times the main rotor diameter (e.g., an 

aircraft with a 36 ft. main rotor diameter would require a 54 ft. diameter opening).

• Before starting cargo operations, A HOGE Power check is accomplished at an altitude 

comparable to the cargo site or greater. A Positive rate of climb must be established 

without exceeding aircraft limitations. Pilot states “hover established, positive rate of 

climb, power is good.”

• Spotter responds” Power is good”

• Spotter activates hot mic if not done already

• Spotter states to pilot “Removing seatbelt” and “moving into position”. (Some Spotters 

may elect to remain in the seat with seatbelt fastened).

• Spotter attaches hard loop on the breakaway strap and ensures carabiner is locked. 

Spotter states to pilot “Hard Loop Connected” Pilot confirms “Hard Loop Connected.”

• Spotter unlocks the figure 8 and ensures the carabiner is clear of the skid.

• Spotter finalizes proper position over cargo site. Using pilot’s perspective (left, right, 

forward, back, and up or down relative to altitude above the ground.)

1.9.4 Cargo Delivery Sequence

• Spotter will communicate with pilot regarding adequate main and tail rotor clearance, 

power assessments, and cargo spot status throughout the cargo operation. Using pilot’s 

perspective (left, right, forward, back, and up or down relative to altitude above the 

ground).

• Spotter states to pilot, “Cargo is ready for deployment on your count.”

• Pilot gives a three (3) count and releases cargo from belly hook.

• Spotter begins lowering cargo with positive control of letdown line; do not allow unarrested descent of cargo. Keep pilot informed of actions and progress of cargo descent:

o “Cargo away”

o “Cargo halfway down”

o “Cargo on the ground”

• When cargo is on the ground, unhook figure 8 from carabiner/anchor and remove letdown 

line. Hold slack in line to prevent billowing and unhook letdown line bag from hard point. 

Wrap excess letdown line around bag and throw clear of aircraft.

• When cargo deployment is complete Spotter states to pilot, “Lines are away, clear to 

depart.”

• Pilot responds, “Lines away, clear to depart”.

• Spotter closes doors (if necessary), returns to seat, and fastens seatbelt.

• Radio returned to normal operational mode and flight following authority is informed that 

cargo operation has been completed

1.10 Cargo Letdown Emergency Procedures

There are many circumstances that can constitute an in-flight emergency. Pilots and Spotters 

must understand that the consequences of an emergency change significantly once cargo have

been deployed. It is extremely important for a pilot and Spotter to have a firm understanding of 

the situation and discuss up front as many circumstances as possible prior to operations. 

“Emergency procedures” are defined as the standard established procedures used to respond to
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

124

a situation, serious in nature, developing suddenly or unexpectedly, and demanding immediate 

action. In the cargo delivery environment, clear and concise communication culminating in a 

coordinated response between the Spotter and pilot is critical to a successful outcome. There are 

two (2) basic categories of emergencies:

1. Those that require an immediate response:

There are a limited number of emergencies that fall into this category. In the cargo delivery 

environment these emergencies are characterized by a need to depart the hover without delay. 

In this type of emergency, the possibility of affecting a positive outcome will be impacted by the 

ability to jettison lines quickly.

Examples of possible emergencies that require an immediate response:

• Engine Failure

• Tail Rotor Failure

• Hard over of controls

• Engine over speed/driveshaft failure

• Compressor Stall (Single engine)

• Governor Failure Low Side (Twin Engine)

• Governor Failure (Single Engine)

2. Those that permit a delayed response: 

There are any numbers of events, typically mechanical or environmental, that fall into this 

category. In the cargo delivery environment, these events are characterized by an ability to delay 

the departure from the hover. In events of this nature there is typically time to complete a cargo

sequence prior to departing the hover.

Caution: These procedures may not require immediate action and responses can vary in time 

from seconds to minutes. Examples of possible events that may permit a delayed response:

• Transmission/Engine/Tail Rotor Gear Box Chip Light

• Hydraulic Failure

• Oil temp/Oil pressure light

• Hydraulic temp or pressure light

• Unknown Master Caution

• Fire light (require pilot check of controls and for fire on board)

• Stuck pedal

• Fuel control or governor failure high side (Twin Engine)

• Electrical failure

• Fuel/air filter clog

• Fuel pump failure

• Decrease in rotor RPM

• Compressor Stall (twin engine)

• Severe up or down drafts
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

125

1.10.1 Cargo Letdown Emergency Procedures: Internal Cargo

Challenge/Response Communications - Immediate Response Emergency 

Pilot States “Abort, Abort”

• Spotter:

o If cargo is still secure:

 Spotter states “Clear”

 Immediately take seat and fasten seatbelt

 Aircraft will depart immediately, and pilot will comply with Rotorcraft

Flight Manual direction.

o If the cargo process has begun and the cargo has been unsecured:

 Spotter states, “Clearing cargo” and:

o If cargo is still in the aircraft:

 Re-secure cargo or Cut line directly above cargo container and Jettison 

cargo out open door.

 Spotter states “Clear”

 Take seat and buckle-up.

o If cargo has been delivered outside the aircraft:

 Cut line

 Spotter states “Clear” when the cargo container has cleared the aircraft

 Take seat and buckle-up.

NOTE: The “Abort, Abort ...” and the subsequent actions taken by the pilot and Spotter 

will occur almost simultaneously. Pilot will attempt to gain forward flight, if possible, 

which will require that the Spotter clear the cargo without hesitation. The pilot is not 

expected to wait for the “Clear” from the Spotter before acting to appropriately respond

to the emergency. Any failure to immediately clear the aircraft of cargo and line may pose 

a threat to the aircraft and personnel onboard.

Challenge and Response Communications - Delayed Response Emergency

When experiencing this type of emergency, “EXPEDITE, EXPEDITE” is intended as the initial 

alert for the crew communicating that the cargo deployment must be curtailed due to an aircraft 

malfunction or environmental condition. Communication shall not be limited, and pilot should 

advise the crew of the status of the aircraft and the intended duration of the flight.

Unnecessary delays should be avoided due to the critical nature of the flight profile. The only 

time there should be any delay is during the cargo deployment sequence. If there is to be a 

delay, the Spotter should advise the pilot as to the amount of time needed to get the cargo on the 

ground and cut line.

Events of a mechanical nature require termination of the cargo mission until such problem(s) can 

be resolved. An event of this nature requires that the pilot announce the problem, describe the 

problem, and inform the Spotter of the actions required to address the event. The ensuing 

discussion between pilot and Spotter will determine a course of action and the time available.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

126

Pilot states “Expedite, Expedite.”

• Spotter

o If cargo is still secure:

 Spotter states “Clear”

 Immediately take seat and buckle-up.

 Aircraft will depart immediately, and pilot will comply with Rotorcraft

Flight Manual direction.

o If cargo has been unsecured but not delivered outside the aircraft:

 Spotter states “Clear”

 Secure the cargo as quickly as possible

 Take seat and buckle seatbelt.

o If you are in mid sequence (cargo has been delivered past the skids)

 Continuation of the cargo delivery may be permissible if circumstances 

warrant.

 Once cargo is on the ground the Spotter will cut the line freeing the aircraft 

for immediate departure and compliance with RFM direction

Events of an environmental nature may be resolved by waiting for the event to subside or 

relocating to an alternate cargo site. An event of this nature requires that the pilot inform the 

Spotter of the actions required to address the event. The ensuing discussion between pilot and 

Spotter will determine a course of action and whether relocation is necessary.

• If relocation is not required:

o Once the pilot and Spotter concur that the event is no longer of concern cargo 

operations can resume.

• If relocation is required: Pilot states “Expedite, Expedite.”

o If cargo is still secure:

 Spotter states “Clear”

 Immediately take seat and buckle-up.

 Aircraft will depart immediately, and pilot will comply with Rotorcraft

Flight Manual direction.

o If cargo has been unsecured but not delivered outside the aircraft:

 Spotter states “Clear”

 Secure the cargo as a quickly as possible

 Take seat and buckle seatbelt.

 If you are in mid sequence (cargo has been delivered past the skids)

o Continuation of the cargo delivery may be permissible if circumstances warrant.

o Once cargo is on the ground the Spotter will cut the line freeing the aircraft for 

immediate departure and compliance with Rotorcraft Flight Manual direction.

1.10.2 Cargo Letdown Emergency Procedures: External Cargo

Challenge/Response Communications - Immediate Response Emergency 

Pilot states “Abort, Abort”
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

127

• Cargo still secure on the belly hook and cargo process has not yet commenced while 

aircraft is in a hover or in forward flight with breakaway strap hooked “Soft”.

o Pilot jettisons external cargo from the aircraft

o Spotter states “Clear” and

o Immediately take seat and fasten seatbelt

• If cargo process has started, break away strap is hooked “hard” w/ figure 8 locked off and 

cargo is still on the hook.

o Spotter states “Cutting Line”

o Spotter cuts line below the figure 8 

o Spotter states “Clear- Jettison Load” and

o Immediately take seat and fasten seatbelt

• If cargo process has started break away strap is hooked “hard” w/ figure 8 unlocked and 

cargo still on the belly hook

o Spotter states “Cutting Line”

o Spotter cuts line below the figure 8 

o Spotter states “Clear- Jettison Load” and

o Immediately take seat and fastens seatbelt

• If the cargo process has begun and the cargo has been released off the belly hook.

o Spotter states “Cutting Line”

o Spotter cuts line below the figure 8 

o Spotter state “Clear” when the letdown line has cleared the aircraft and

o Immediately take seat and buckle-up.

NOTE: The “Abort, Abort ...” and the subsequent actions taken by the pilot and Spotter will occur 

almost simultaneously. Pilot will attempt to gain forward flight, if possible, which will require that 

the Spotter clear the cargo without hesitation. The pilot is not expected to wait for the “Clear” 

from the Spotter before acting to appropriately respond to the emergency. Any failure to 

immediately clear the aircraft of cargo and line may pose a threat to the aircraft and personnel 

onboard.

Challenge/Response Communications - Delayed Response Emergency

When experiencing this type of emergency, “Expedite, Expedite” is intended as the initial alert for 

the crew communicating that the cargo deployment must be curtailed due to an aircraft 

malfunction or environmental condition. Communication shall not be limited, and pilot should 

advise the crew of the status of the aircraft and the intended duration of the flight.

Unnecessary delays should be avoided due to the critical nature of the flight profile. The only 

time there should be any delay is during the cargo deployment sequence. If there is to be a 

delay, the Spotter should advise the pilot as to the amount of time needed to get the cargo on the 

ground and cut line.

Events of a mechanical nature require termination of the cargo mission until such problem(s) can 

be resolved. An event of this nature requires that the pilot announce the problem, describe the 

problem, and inform the Spotter of the actions required to address the event. The ensuing 

discussion between pilot and Spotter will determine a course of action and the time available.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

128

Pilot states: “Expedite, Expedite.”

• If cargo is still secure on the belly hook and cargo process has not yet commenced while 

aircraft is in a hover or in forward flight with breakaway strap hooked “Soft”.

o Spotter states “Clear” Cargo can be jettisoned at pilot discretion

o Spotter immediately takes seat and fastens seat belt.

o Aircraft will depart immediately, and pilot will comply with Rotorcraft Flight

Manual direction.

• If cargo process has started, break away strap is hooked “hard” w/ figure 8 locked off and 

cargo is still on the hook.

o Spotter states “Going to soft loop”

o Spotter disconnects breakaway strap from carabiner and connects carabiner to 

soft loop. Spotter states “Clear- to Jettison Load” at pilot discretion

o Spotter immediately takes seat and fastens seatbelt.

• If cargo process has started break away strap is hooked “hard” w/ figure 8 unlocked and 

cargo still on the belly hook

o Spotter states “Clearing Breakaway Strap”

o Spotter disconnects Breakaway strap from carabineer or cuts letdown line below 

the figure 8

o Spotter states “Clear to Jettison Load” at pilot discretion

o Spotter immediately takes seat and fastens seatbelt

• If the cargo process has begun and the cargo has been released off the belly hook.

o Continuation of the cargo delivery may be permissible if circumstances warrant.

o Once cargo is on the ground the Spotter will cut the line below the figure 8 freeing 

the aircraft for immediate departure and compliance with RFM direction.

o Spotter states “Clear” when the letdown line has cleared the aircraft

o Spotter immediately takes seat and buckles up.

Events of an environmental nature may be resolved by waiting for the event to subside or 

relocating to an alternate cargo site. An event of this nature requires that the pilot inform the 

Spotter of the actions required to address the event. The ensuing discussion between pilot and 

Spotter will determine a course of action and whether relocation is necessary.

• If relocation is not required:

o Once the pilot and Spotter concur that the event is no longer of concern cargo 

operations can resume.

• If relocation is required Pilot states “Expedite, Expedite”.

o Cargo still secure on the belly hook and cargo process has not yet commenced 

while aircraft is in a hover or in forward flight with breakaway strap hooked “Soft”.

 Spotter states “Clear” Cargo can be jettisoned at pilot discretion

 Spotter immediately takes seat and fastens seatbelt.

 Aircraft will depart immediately, and pilot will comply with Rotorcraft

Flight Manual direction.

o If cargo process has started, break away strap is hooked “hard” w/ figure 8 locked 

off and cargo is still on the hook.

 Spotter states “Going to soft loop”
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

129

 Spotter disconnects breakaway strap from carabiner and connects carabiner 

to soft loop. Spotter states “Clear- to Jettison Load” at pilot discretion

 Spotter immediately takes seat and fastens seatbelt.

o If cargo process has started break away strap is hooked “hard” w/ figure 8 

unlocked and cargo still on the belly hook

 Spotter states “Clearing Breakaway Strap”

 Spotter disconnects Breakaway strap from carabineer or cuts letdown line 

below the figure 8

 Spotter states “Clear to Jettison Load” at pilot discretion

 Spotter immediately takes seat and fastens seatbelt.

o If the cargo process has begun and the cargo has been released off the belly 

hook.

 Continuation of the cargo delivery may be permissible if circumstances 

warrant.

 Once cargo is on the ground the Spotter will cut the line below the figure 8 

freeing the aircraft for immediate departure and compliance with Rotorcraft 

Flight Manual direction.

 Spotter states “Clear” when the letdown line has cleared the aircraft

 Spotter immediately takes seat and fastens seatbelt.

1.11 Cargo Letdown Activities in Support of Extended Attack or Large Fire Operations

Integration of cargo letdown activities into complex airspace associated with extended attack and 

large fire operations necessitates risk assessment and operational planning to ensure the safety 

of aircraft and ground personnel.

While working on extended attack and large fire incidents where cargo letdown operations are 

planned (medical response, IA within the incident response zone, division requests, line 

resupply, proficiency, etc.), the following conditions should be met:

• Identified in the Incident Action Plan in the ICS-220 and the ICS-204 for the location 

where the cargo letdown operation is planned to occur.

• Reviewed by the highest-level aviation position assigned.

• Completed operational risk assessment and briefing.

• Coordinated with the helibase manager prior to conducting operations at the helibase.

Costs associated with routine proficiency operations and/or cargo letdown will be the 

responsibility of the agency contracting the helicopter.

1.12 Cargo Letdown Training 

Objectives:

• Describe the function of all cargo letdown equipment

• Demonstrate proper cargo letdown configuration

• Demonstrate proper cargo letdown procedures without error
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

130

• Demonstrate effective communications with pilot

Key Points

• Gather cargo letdown equipment

• Reference procedures, Challenge and Response in the Interagency Helicopter Rappel 

Guide (IHRG), Appendix B

• Pilot should be present during this phase of the training

• Utilize BLM Cargo Letdown Trainee Qualification Record

Lesson Outline

Ground Training

• Review cargo letdown procedures

o Familiarize trainee with equipment

o Review applicable portions of IHRG

• Familiarize trainee with Spotter equipment checks and Spotter “buddy check.”

o Stress that the Spotter is responsible to ensure all equipment is in good condition 

and properly fitted

• Cargo letdown training should be accomplished utilizing a Cargo Letdown tower in 

addition to helicopter mock-ups but utilizing helicopter mock-ups as the sole means of 

ground training is acceptable.

• Demonstrate anchor inspection.

• Demonstrate placement and securing of cargo.

• Demonstrate pre-flight checks, e.g., Spotter equipment check, hook checks, etc.

• Demonstrate cargo configuration procedures.

• Demonstrate cargo letdown procedures, including Spotter and pilot communications, and 

emergency procedures.

• Trainee will perform the following until instructor deems competency is accomplished 

(minimum of three (3) complete cycles without procedural error):

o Anchor inspection

o Secure of cargo

o Cargo letdown procedures

o Spotter and pilot communications

o Emergency procedures

Helicopter Deployment

• Under the supervision of a qualified Spotter, trainee will inspect equipment, prepare cargo 

load, configure the helicopter, and deploy a minimum of ten cargo letdown cycles,

without procedural error, at low, medium, and high heights. Five (5) of these deployments 

will be in typical terrain. Final evaluation will be completed by a Check Spotter.

• Should at any point during live cargo deployment the trainee makes repetitive procedural 

errors, the instructor will return the trainee to ground training for additional training.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

131

BLM Cargo Letdown Trainee Qualification Record

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING QUALIFICATION RECORDS

Each requirement or task for each qualification record shall be completed under the direct supervision of 

a qualified HERS/HCLS and signed and dated by the evaluating Spotter Trainer. Comments should be 

included in the space provided to ensure appropriate documentation of performance and to provide 

feedback to trainees. The number of evaluations of each task is not limited to the number of signature 

lines provided within the Evaluator/Date column.

CARGO LETDOWN TRAINEE:

TRAINEE’S NAME DUTY STATION PHONE NUMBER

TRAINEE RECOMMENDED BY:

NAME TITLE PHONE NUMBER

QUALIFICATION RECORD INITINATED BY:

NAME TITLE PHONE NUMBER

Helicopter Make/Model:

Notes:

SIGNATURE DATE
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

132

Position: CARGO LETDOWN SPOTTER Trainee: 

TASK: CARGO LETDOWN GROUND TRAINING Evaluator Date Comments

1 Review IHRG Chapters 3,4,7, and Appendix B 

2 Equipment inspections procedures

3 Documentation of equipment

4 Discuss model specific procedures

5 Review Go-No Go checklist & Discuss mission 

specific Risk Mgt.

6 Discuss CRM and Spotter directions with pilot

7 Discuss emergency procedures with pilot 

present

TASK: CARGO LETDOWN SIMULATOR (optional) Evaluator Date Comments

1 Tower, simulator briefing

2 Cabin configuration and rigging (model specific)

3 Challenge and Response with pilot

4 Proper equipment checks

5. Cargo configuration

6 Cargo equipment orientation

7 Rigging and deploying cargo

8 Maintain visual on cargo

9 Emergency procedures

TASK: CARGO LETDOWN MOCK-UPS Evaluator Date Comments

1 Proper Briefing crew /pilot

2 Proper rigging /model specific

3 Verbalization with pilot

4 Proper equipment checks

5 Cargo configuration

6 Cargo equipment orientation

7 Maintain control during deployment
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

133

8 Maintain focus and control of mission

9 Emergency procedures

TASK: CARGO LETDOWN INITIAL LIVE 

HELICOPTER

Evaluator Date Comments

1 Proper rigging /model specific

2 Proper Briefing crew /pilot

3 Proper Equipment Checks

4 Proper Verbalization

5 Ensure power check completed

6

Select adequate cargo letdown site and alternate 

sites and notify ground resources of mission 

(Stay Clear)

7 Maintain aircraft and rotor clearance throughout 

sequence

8 Maintain visual on cargo letdown line and cargo

9 Maintain controlled decent of load to the ground

10 Maintain focus and control of mission

TASK: CARGO LETDOWN CHECKRIDE Evaluator Date Comments

1 Configure helicopter with proper Cargo rigging 

and perform appropriate equipment checks

2 Maintain communication with appropriate flight 

following authority

3 Identify flight hazards

4 Identity adequate cargo letdown and alternate 

emergency sites

5 Assess helicopter performance capabilities at 

local temp. and altitude, perform power check

6 Assist pilot to position helicopter over cargo 

letdown site

7 Deploy cargo using appropriate verbiage with 

pilot

8 Maintain clearance of cargo from all obstacles
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

134

9 Maintain aircraft and rotor clearance throughout 

cargo sequence

10 Deploy cargo maintaining controlled decent at all 

times

11

Establish communication with firefighters on the 

ground. Report to appropriate flight following 

authority

12 Debrief with HERS/HCCS

TASK: ASSIST IN INSTRUCTION OF CARGO 

LETDOWN TRAINING

Evaluator Date Comments

BASE NAME:

1

2

3

TASK: CHECKRIDE PROCEDURAL ERROR FREE 

CYCLES

Evaluator Date Comments

1 Low < 75’ AGL

2 Low < 75’ AGL

3 Medium 75’ to 150’ AGL

4 Medium 75’ to 150’ AGL

5 High Above 150” AGL

6 Low - Typical Terrain

7 Medium - Typical Terrain

8 Medium - Typical Terrain

9 High - Typical Terrain

10 High - Typical Terrain
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

135

CARGO LETDOWN SPOTTER TRAINEE APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION

Additional Cargo Letdown Training Recommended

No Yes Date

Recommendation:

Spotter Trainer Name Signature Date

Successful Completion of Cargo Letdown Training

No Yes Date

Annual Recertification

Annual Recertification

Annual Recertification

Annual Recertification

Date Certifying Official

Comments:
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

136

Mission Conditions Yes No

Is this CLD mission necessary? (Pilot and Spotter in agreement)

Is this a time critical mission?

Site Conditions

Does vegetation exceed limitations?

Is there a helispot location nearby that could be utilized instead?

Do the main and tail rotors have adequate clearance from terrain and trees?

Is terrain conducive to receiving cargo? (Too steep? Etc.)

Aircraft/Pilot

Are pilot and aircraft approved for the mission?

Pilot completed pre-flight checks?

Intercom and radio communications set and checked?

Load calculation completed for the CLD deployment site?

Remove or secure all loose items within the aircraft?

Pilot briefed for the intended mission and communication procedures?

Weather/Time

Are winds within an acceptable range to perform a CLD operation?

Is there enough time to complete the operation before sunset (pumpkin time)?

Spotter

Is the Spotter qualified and proficient to perform this operation?

Preflight walk around check of helicopter performed by Spotter?

Spotter checks completed?

Spotter harness and tether in working order and installed correctly?

Spotter PPE utilized?

Completed a pre-deployment briefing to all parties involved?

Completed an emergency procedures briefing with the pilot?

Equipment

Is all CLD equipment approved and in good working order?

Internal cargo rigged and checked by Spotter?

Operations

All personnel briefed for the operation, emergency plan in place?

Ground personnel briefed? (Remain away from site)

Communication with pilot is good?

High hover power check is good, positive rate of climb established. Power is Good?

Completed By:

CLD Operation Approved By:

Check Spotter Name Signature Date

BLM Cargo Letdown Decision Matrix
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

137

BLM Cargo Letdown GAR Risk Model

Operation: Scheduled Date:

Objective(s):

Supervision Circle the number as appropriate

Supervisor has perfect knowledge about the <1 2 3 4 5 6 Supervisor has little knowledge about the

mission, personnel, capabilities and 7 8 9 10> mission, personnel, capabilities, and limitations,

limitations, and can apply the and lacks skill, knowledge, or ability to apply the

appropriate control to minimize risk appropriate control to minimize risk.

Planning

There is a well-designed plan that is <1 2 3 4 5 6 There is no plan, or the plan doesn’t address

reviewed and revised as needed to meet the 7 8 9 10> many current adaptations made in response of

demands for safety and efficiency and to demands for efficiency. Time constraints have a

account for adaptation. Time is well strong effect on ability to plan.

managed.

Contingency Resources

Reliable alternative equipment and <1 2 3 4 5 6 The outcome depends on the equipment and

personnel are available, easily accessed 7 8 9 10> personnel assigned completing the mission

and informed about the mission perfectly. Failure is not an option

requirements

Communication

Interpersonal communications are clear and <1 2 3 4 5 6 There is low trust in the organization or the

there is a high level of trust in the 7 8 9 10> personnel/communication equipment is

organization. Adequate personnel and unreliable based on the expected needs for the

technology are available to relay information mission.

accurately to those who make the decisions

Team Selection

Multiple personnel with skill, knowledge and <1 2 3 4 5 6 Only one person is available and the success of

ability are available to fulfill the requirements 7 8 9 10> the mission depends on that person juggling

of the mission. Selection and preparation many responsibilities to squeeze this mission

are done well in advance so there is plenty into the work schedule. Additional time will be

of time for personnel to get personal and job donated to keep up with the workload

related demands addressed.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

138

Team Fitness

Personnel are trained, proficient, healthy, <1 2 3 4 5 6 Personnel lack one or more critical component

and rested prior to starting the mission. 7 8 9 10> in their training. These persons have been

Personal issues are addressed and little squeezing in many additional duties as

external stress is being exerted. assigned distracting them from their proficiency

or personal life.

Environment

Weather and visibility are conducive to the <1 2 3 4 5 6 Winds are unpredictable, temperature is

best possible chance for success in the 7 8 9 10> extreme, low ceilings and visibilities,

mission. Operational tempo is appropriate precipitation, sun angle creates strong

for the mission shadows, etc. Mission tempo is too low or high.

Mission Complexity

A single agency is involved with personnel <1 2 3 4 5 6 Multiple agencies are involved in a mission that

from the same unit who regularly work 7 8 9 10> defies definition or has ever been attempted.

together. Mission is straight forward and Personnel are new to each other and come

covered by standard operating procedures. from different cultures. Many leaders are

emerging and working toward different

objectives.

Mission Total

Benefit Statement:

GAR Assessment Completed by:

Operation Approved by: Title:

Date:

GREEN ZONE (1-35) AMBER ZONE (36-60) RED ZONE (61-80)
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

139

BLM Risk Assessment for Cargo Letdown

BLM RISK ASSESSMENT 

MATRIX FOR CARGO 

LETDOWN HAZARD PROBABILITY

Frequent Probable Occasional Remote Improbable

A B C D E

EFFECT

Catastrophic I High (4) Medium

Critical II Serious (3) Medium

Marginal III Serious Medium (2)

Negligible IV Medium Low (1)

Assignment: Internal Cargo Let-Down Date: 2009

Pre-Mitigation hazards rate out as: Medium (2)

Describe Hazard: Probability

(A-E)

Effect

(I-IV)

Risk

Level

1. Aircraft Performance, allowable weight limits E I Med (2)

2. Unsecured items E I Med (2)

3. Mechanical failure E I Med (2)

4. Equipment malfunction E I Med (2)

5. Environmental-hot, high, gusty winds C II Serious

(3)

6. Unqualified personnel E II Low (1)

Mitigation Controls:

Post-Mitigation hazards rate out as: Low (1)

Probability

(A-E)

Effect

(I-IV)

Risk

Level

1. Aircraft Performance – use HOGE performance 

charts, proper fuel load, c/g calculation, load calc

complete, manifest complete/correct

E II Low (1)

2. Unsecured items—secure loose items, clear aircraft of

unnecessary items, double check

E II Low (1)

3. Mechanical failure—power checks complete,

emergency procedures known and followed, follow 

IHRG, qualified mechanic

E II Low (1)

4. Equipment malfunction—complete logbook as per

IHRG, inspect equip as per IHRG complete Spotter 

checks

E II Low (1)

5. Environmental—OGE power check, check weather

forecast, identify/utilize alternate sites

D III Low (1)

6. Unqualified personnel—check pilot card, CLD Spotter

carded and proficient

E III Low (1)

Operation Approved by: Title: Date:
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

140

BLM Cargo Letdown Carabiner Log

ID#: Date Put Into Service: Date Retired: 

Inspection/Use 

Date:

Inspector Signature Remarks/Problems
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

141

BLM Cargo Letdown Harness Log

CLD Spotter Issued To:

ID#: Date Put Into Service: Date Retired: 

Inspection/Use 

Date:

Inspector Signature Remarks/Problems
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

142

BLM Cargo Letdown Line Log

ID#: Date Put Into Service: Date Retired: 

Number of Prior Uses: 

Date Spotter Height End Inspection

Date

Inspector

Signature

Remarks/Problems
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

143

BLM Cargo Letdown Mission Log

Date Operator Mission Cargo

type/ 

weight

# of 

Letdowns

Carabiner Let

down 

Line

Harness Figure 

8 

Notes
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

144

Appendix 7 - BLM Fleet Aircraft Standard Operations Procedures

The Bureau of Land Management currently operates seven fleet aircraft, N49SJ, N190PE, N700FW, N618,

N162GC, N437CC and N32PX. The following procedures will be utilized for all BLM fleet aircraft.

Administration Aircraft

N49SJ, N190PE, N32PX, N700FW, N618, N162GC, and N437CC are DOI owned aircraft

operated by the BLM. N49SJ, N618, N162GC and N190PE are Boise based and maintenance is managed 

through OAS Headquarters in Boise ID. N32PX, N700FW and N437CC are Alaska based and maintenance is 

managed through Alaska Region OAS in Anchorage.

N49SJ – DE Havilland DHC-6-300 Twin Otter

BLM NAO maintains overall management responsibility. The aircraft is assigned to the Boise Smokejumpers.

N618 and N162GC – Beechcraft Super King Air B200

BLM NAO maintains overall management responsibility. The aircraft is assigned to the National Aviation 

Office.

N190PE – Pilatus PC-12

BLM NAO maintains overall management responsibility. The aircraft is assigned to Alaska Fire Service a 

portion of the year and Boise NAO the balance of that year.

N190PE core use period will be mid-April through mid-September as dictated by conditions.

The Aircraft will transition to Alaska as negotiated with AFS and the BLM National Flight Operations Manager. 

That will usually occur on or around mid-April depending upon anticipated needs.

The Aircraft will transition to Boise from Alaska when negotiated by AFS and the NAO Flight Operations 

Manager.

Funding for the transition to Boise will be done under a resource order or as designated by the NAO Flight 

Operations Manager.

N700FW – Quest Kodiak K-100

BLM NAO maintains overall management responsibility. The aircraft is assigned to Alaska Fire Service a 

portion of the year and Boise NAO the balance of that year.

N700FW core use period will be mid-April through mid-September as dictated by conditions.

The Aircraft will transition to Alaska as negotiated with AFS and the BLM National Flight Operations Manager. 

That will usually occur on or around mid-April depending upon anticipated needs.

The Aircraft will transition to Boise from Alaska when negotiated by AFS and the NAO Flight Operations 

Manager.

Funding for the transition to Boise will be done under a resource order or as designated by the NAO Flight 

Operations Manager.

N32PX – Cessna U206F

The BLM Alaska-Office of Law Enforcement and Security will have primary use of the aircraft through the 

calendar year flown by OAS carded BLM-AK law enforcement pilots. The
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

145

management of the aircraft will fall under the State Aviation Office with mission management under ADO and 

Anchorage Interagency Dispatch Center.

N437CC – Cub Crafters CC-18-180

The BLM Alaska-Office of Law Enforcement and Security will have primary use of the aircraft through the 

calendar year flown by OAS carded BLM-AK law enforcement pilots. The management of the aircraft will fall

under the State Aviation Office with mission management under FDO and Anchorage Interagency Dispatch 

Center.

Pilots

Pilots seeking to be qualified in BLM aircraft will be approved through the NAO and must attend an approved 

simulator training course in that aircraft type. If no simulator training is available, a training plan will be

developed to meet the training needs of the Pilot and approved by the NAO.

Staffing

BLM aircraft are staffed to meet the appropriate mission as denoted below.

Lower 48 Staffing

N49SJ: Primary staffing will be provided by FA-500. During the fire season the goal is that the aircraft is 

staffed 7 days a week.

N190PE, N700FW: Primary staffing will be provided by BLM Alaska during the core operational use.

N618 and N162GC: Primary staffing will be provided by the BLM NAO.

N437CC: N/A

N32PX: N/A

The Temporary Duty Assignment for the Alaska pilot while in the L48 will allow travel to the domicile or 

equivalent at the end of a 27-day period.

Outside of the core use period the NAO Flight Operations Manager will prescribe staffing levels with available 

pilots.

Alaska Staffing

N190PE, N700FW: The aircraft will be staffed on a 12 on, 2 off schedule during the Alaska use period. Days

off will be established to not coincide with the scheduled days off of other logistics aircraft.

N32PX: The aircraft will be staffed to meet the needs of the Anchorage Field Office.

N437CC: The aircraft will be staffed to meet the needs of the Fairbanks Field Office.

Fleet Aircraft Use Report Manager (AURM)

The AURM is used within DOI for government owned “Fleet” aircraft billing to create aircraft use report data 

files which are emailed to OASfleetmanager@ios.doi.gov for uploading into the FBMS system. Download the

latest version of the AURM from the OAS website. OAS Technical Services has also developed a "next 

generation" Aircraft Use Report Manager application for iPads. Because the AURMA is not released to the 

public, it is not available on the iTunes app store. Instead, contact Sherry Lambert (208-433-5084, 

shery_lambert@ios.doi.gov)

Fuel

Lower 48

When utilizing either the Government Multiservice Aircard or the OAS MasterCard, fleet aircraft will attempt to 

purchase fuel at a DOD Vendor.

Record flight time under the pay item code “FW” (Wet Rate) on the OASAURM when receiving fuel from these 

locations.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

146

Receipts for fuel purchased through the Government Aircard Multiservice program will be mailed directly to 

OAS Fleet Activities Specialist (Andrea Peckham) weekly.

Fuel or other items (oil, maintenance, etc.) purchased with the OAS MasterCard will follow OAS requirements,

and signed statements with receipts will be provided in the requisite time and format to the appropriate 

authority.

Both fleet aircraft may purchase fuel through the NIFC ramp, and no charge code is required. Fuel is part of 

the flight rate on both fleet aircraft.

NIFC ramp fuel receipts must be submitted in the same manner as the Government Aircard program, IE 

weekly to OAS Fleet Activities Specialist.

Alaska

Alaska Fire Service has fueling contracts for Fort Wainwright and Galena. Record flight time under the pay

item code “DF” (Dry Rate) on the OAS AURM when receiving fuel from these locations. Fuel received at these 

locations will be recorded on an OAS-59 provided to the pilot by the fueler.

Navigation/Charting data base updates

The data bases will be purchased by the BLM Aviation Office through the aircraft account. Those services 

(electronic and paper) will be updated by the pilot currently assigned to the aircraft in the requisite time 

intervals specified.

Aircraft Mission N49SJ

Primary mission is as a Smokejumper aircraft.

During fire season the aircraft is staffed 7 days a week.

Outside of fire season this aircraft is staffed during normal business hours.

While this aircraft is not in fire season aircraft maintenance is should occur during normal business hours.

During fire season maintenance support is encouraged to use extraordinary measures (overtime, AOG parts,

charter aircraft to transport maintenance personnel and/or parts, etc.) to keep the aircraft in flight status per 

the maintenance procedures that follow.

N190PE

Primary mission as a multi-role utility, Air Attack, and logistics aircraft.

During the core use period this aircraft is staffed at single pilot duty requirements. 12 on 2 off or 6 on and 1 off 

with a maximum of 14-hour duty days.

During the non-core use period the aircraft is staffed as the NAO Flight Operations Manager requires.

During all operations maintenance support is sought during normal business hours as determined by the 

maintenance procedures that follow.

There is currently no provision for a relief pilot in the core use period.

The in-flight opening door is approved for use for photogrammetry.

Special Use (<500” AGL) require an ALSE approved flight helmet.

N700FW

Primary mission as a multi-role utility, Air Attack, and logistics aircraft.

During the core use period this aircraft is staffed at single pilot duty requirements which are 12 on 2 off or 6 on 

and 1 off with a maximum of 14-hour duty days.

During the non-core use period the aircraft is staffed as the NAO Flight Operations Manager requires.

During all operations maintenance support is sought during normal business hours as determined by the 

maintenance procedures that follow.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

147

There is currently no provision for a relief pilot in the core use period.

Special Use (<500” AGL) require an ALSE approved flight helmet.

N618 and N162GC

Primary mission as an ASM/lead plane aircraft.

During the core use period these aircraft is staffed at single pilot duty requirements which are 12 on 2 off or 6 

on and 1 off with a maximum of 14-hour duty days.

During the non-core use period these aircraft is staffed as the NAO Flight Operations Manager requires.

While these aircraft are not in fire season aircraft maintenance is sought during normal business hours.

During fire season maintenance support is encouraged to use extraordinary measures (overtime, AOG parts,

charter aircraft to transport maintenance personnel and/or parts, etc.) to keep the aircraft in flight status per 

the maintenance procedures that follow.

N618 and N162GC meet all the requirements to perform ASM and lead plane missions; Air Tactical missions 

must be conducted only with qualified ATP/LPIL/AITS.

There is currently no provision for a relief pilot in the core use period.

The in-flight opening door is not approved for use at this time.

N32PX

Primary mission to support the BLM’s Law Enforcement program.

Enhanced patrol and investigative coverage to lands and resources that were previously unpatrolled for their 

remoteness and distance from Anchorage and the state’s road system.

N437CC

Primary mission to support the BLM’s Law Enforcement program.

Enhanced patrol and investigative coverage to lands and resources that were previously unpatrolled for their 

remoteness and distance from Fairbanks and the state’s road system.

Single Engine Operations

351 DM 1.3 provides authorization for DOI aircraft to perform night and IFR operations in Single Engine 

aircraft.

United States Forest Service FSM 5716 provides authorization for the Forest Service to perform night and IFR 

operations in Single Engine aircraft.

Aircraft Scheduling N49SJ

Scheduled through the Boise Smokejumpers.

N190PE

Scheduled by Alaska Interagency Coordination Center (AICC), Aircraft Desk while in Alaska or the National

Interagency Coordination Center (NICC) while in the Lower 48. During the non-core use period the NAO Flight 

Operations Manager will schedule the aircraft.

N618 and N162GC

Scheduled through NAO Flight Operations Manager/Boise Interagency Dispatch Center.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

148

N700FW

Scheduled by Upper Yukon Dispatch Center, Aircraft Desk while in Alaska or the National Interagency

Coordination Center (NICC) while in the Lower 48. During the non-core use period the NAO Flight Operations 

Manager will schedule the aircraft.

N32PX

Scheduled by Anchorage Interagency Dispatch Center.

N437CC

Scheduled by Anchorage Interagency Dispatch Center.

Maintenance

Use of a government contract requires the permission of the appropriate Contracting Officer. For unscheduled

maintenance or scheduled maintenance from other than the Boise contractor, a list of government contract

maintenance facilities is included in each airplane. Flight Crew members will contact OAS to assure the proper

payment schedule is in place (i.e., credit cards or purchase order) and that the facility has the pertinent 

expertise, manuals, tools, and parts to perform the work. Flight crewmembers will need to assure that the 

repair facility understands the BLM discrepancy reporting and sign-off procedures.

If a maintenance issue arises in the field, the Flight Crew Member on duty will contact the OAS Aircraft 

Maintenance Specialist as soon as possible.

If they are not available, you may then contact the appropriate maintenance facility directly. For minor

unscheduled maintenance, Flight crewmembers may contact the vendors directly. The OAS Aircraft 

Maintenance Specialist shall be contacted as soon as possible.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

149

Appendix 8 – Acting vs Point of Contact

State Aviation Manager (SAM) and Unit Aviation Manager (UAM) “Acting” vs 

“Point of Contact” Definitions and Expectations

Acting: Authority by position to make and implement decisions directly related to aviation operations

• Signs documents at the appropriate level.

• Clear direction is given during in-brief on COR roles, if qualified to perform COR duties or as a PI as delegated 

by the COR.

• Will be provided copies/access to State/Unit Aviation Plans, contacts, and related documents.

• Brief aviation crews and Incident Management Teams as applicable.

• Must receive a briefing from SAM or UAM.

• Working knowledge of Aviation Policy and operations.

Longer Term Detail:

• Must have "Manage" access to edit SAFECOMs and make public for their state

• Letter of Delegation as per state aviation plan on Project Aviation Safety Plan (PASP) signature levels

• Qualifications: At a minimum meets currency for Aviation Manager (OPM-04) and COR or PI roles if applicable.

Point of Contact (POC): aka “Messenger”

Forwards/refers aviation information and questions to a qualified UAM, SAM or Duty Officer as per chain-of 

command. Does not give direction, sign, or authorize flight or Project Aviation Safety Plans (PASPs).

Ultimately, the POC “messages” information to the identified next in chain-of-command (AFMO, FMO, Duty Officer, 

Dispatch) who has the authority and qualifications to make aviation decisions.

• Will be provided a copy/access to State/Unit Aviation Plans and related aviation documents.

• Mustreceive a briefing from SAM or UAM.

• General working knowledge of Aviation Policy and operations.

Qualifications: At a minimum, have at least one aviation related red-card qualification (HECM, HMGB, SEMG, ATGS 

etc.) or IAT aircrew member currency or a Duty Officer. 

SAM & UAM responsibilities Reference BLM NAP 2.5 BLM State/District/Field Office Organizations
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

150

Appendix 9 - Acronyms

Acronym Definition

310-1 Wildland Fire Incident Management System

9400-1a BLM Flight Request Form

AAF Aviation Airport Facilities

ABC BLM Airbase Committee

ABOD Aviation Board of Directors

ACETA Aerial Capture Eradication and Tagging of Animals

ACMIS Acquisition Career Management Information System

ACOR Alternate COR

AD Administratively Determined

AFF Automated Flight Following

AFS BLM Alaska Fire Service

AGL Above Ground Level

AIRS Aviation Information Reporting Support

ALDI BLM Aviation Leadership Development Initiative

ALSE Aviation Life Support Equipment Handbook

AMD-23E Aircraft Use Report Form

AMG BLM Aviation Management Group

AMOC Air Marine Operations Center - US Border Patrol

AMS IBC Aviation Management Systems

AOA Aircraft Operations Area (AOA)

AQD Acquisition Services Directorate

AQD-13 Request for Contract Services

AQD-16 Contract Award/Renewal Recommendation and Funding Availability Certification

AQD-19 Notice to Proceed

AQD-20 Request for Rental Services

AQD-91 Flight Services Request Form

ARA Aircraft Rental Agreement

ARTCC Air Route Traffic Control

ASAT Aviation Safety Assistance Team

ASM Aerial Supervision Module

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATGS Air Tactical Group Supervisor

ATP Air Tactical Pilot

AITS Air Tactical Supervisor

AURM Aircraft Use Report Manager (Fleet)

AV Exclusive Use Contract Availability

BLM Bureau of Land Management

BPA Blanket Purchase Agreement

BVC Best Value Comparison (Part of AQD-91)

CO Contracting Officer

COA Certificate of Authorizations

COR Contracting Officer’s Representative

COTR Contracting Officer Technical Representative

CFA Controlled Firing Areas

CWN Call When Needed

DHS Department of Homeland Security

DINS Internet NOTAM Service - DOD

DM Departmental Manual
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

151

Acronym Definition

DOD Department Of Defense

DOI Department of the Interior

EAB Executive Aviation Board

EAC Executive Aviation Committee

EAS Executive Aviation Sub-Committee

EATPL Emergency Air Traffic Priority List

ESCAT Emergency Security Control of Air Traffic

ETA Estimated Time of Arrival

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAIRS Federal Aviation for Interactive Reporting System

FAO Forest Aviation Officer

FAR Federal Acquisition Regulations

FAR Federal Aviation Regulations

FBMS Financial and Business Management System

FLT BLM Fire Leadership Team

FMO Fire Management Officer

FOR Fixed Operating Rate

FPMR Federal Property Management Regulations

FTA Fire Traffic Area

FWFM Fixed Wing Flight Managers

GA General Aviation

GACC Geographical Area Coordination Centers

GTR Government Transportation Request

HB Handbooks

HOGE Hover Out of Ground Effect

IAA Interagency Agreement

IASC Interagency Airspace Subcommittee

FWFM Fixed Wing Flight Managers

IASG Interagency Aerial Supervision Guide

IASS Interagency Aerial Supervision Subcommittee

IAT Interagency Aviation Training

IATS Interagency Aviation Training Subcommittee

IBC 

IBS

Interior Business Center 

Incident Business System

IC Incident Commander

IES Illuminating Engineering Society

IFR Instrument Flight Rules

IHOpS Interagency Helicopters Operations Subcommittee

IHRG Interagency Helicopter Rappel Guide

IIC OAS Safety Investigator-In-Charge

IPAC Intra-Governmental Payment and Collection

IPP 

IROC

Internet Payment Platform

Interagency Resource Ordering Capability

ISPOG Interagency Smokejumper Pilots Operations Guide

IWP Incident With Potential

LAT Large Airtanker

LATN Low Altitude Tactical Navigation Areas

LE Law Enforcement Operations

LPIL Lead plane Pilot

LOA Letter of Authorization

M3 Aviation Management for Supervisors training course
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

152

Acronym Definition

M-410 Facilitative Instructor

MAC Multi-Agency Coordination

MACAP Mid Air Collision Avoidance Program

MAP Mandatory Availability Period

MAFFS Modular Airborne Fire Fighting System

MOU Memorandum of Understanding

SDS Safety Data Sheet

NAO BLM National Aviation Office

NAP BLM National Aviation Plan

NIAC National Interagency Aviation Committee

NIAIS National Interagency Airspace Information System

NICC National Interagency Coordination Center

NM Nautical Mile

NMAC National Multi-Agency Coordinating Group

NORAD North American Aerospace Defense Command

NOTAM 

NSHO

Notice to Airmen

NWCG Standards for Helicopter Operations

NTSB National Transportation Safety Board

NWCG National Wildfire Coordinating Group

OAS Office of Aviation Services

OAS-2 Fleet Use Report

OPM Operational Procedures Memorandums

OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration

PASP Project Aviation Safety Plan

PI Project Inspector

PPE Personal Protective Equipment

PRISM Procurement Information System for Management

QPL Qualified Products List

RADS Rope Assisted Deployment

Redbook Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations

RMP Resource Management Plans

SABO 

SAM

NWCG Standards for Airtanker Base Operations 

BLM State Aviation Manager

SAP FBMS related Systems, Applications, and Products data processing software

SAR Search and Rescue

SAS NWCG Standards for Aerial Supervision

SASES Smokejumper Aircraft Screening Equipment & Evaluation Subcommittee

SDS Safety Data Sheet

SEAT Single Engine Airtanker

SECO SEAT Coordinator

SEMG Single Engine Airtanker Manager

SES Senior Executive Service

SFMO State Fire Management Officer

SGI Special Government Interest Waiver

SME Subject Matter Expert

SMS Safety Management System

SR’s Slow Routes

SUA Special Use Airspace

TFR Temporary Flight Restriction

TSA Transportation Security Administration

UAM Unit Aviation Manager
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

153

Acronym Definition

UAO Unit Aviation Officer

UAS Unmanned Aircraft Systems

USDA United States Department of Agriculture

USFS United States Forest Service

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VLAT Very Large Airtanker

WFCS Wildland Fire Chemical Systems

WH&B Wild Horse and Burro
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

154

Appendix 10 – OR/WA Law Enforcement Aviation Operations Supplement

2022

BLM Oregon and Washington 

Law Enforcement

Aviation Plan Supplement

This document is a supplement to the 2022 BLM Oregon and Washington State Aviation Plan and 

is incorporated by reference as policy for BLM Oregon and Washington. It will be updated yearly

along with the BLM Oregon and Washington State Aviation Plan. Suggested changes to the

document can be sent at any time to the BLM Oregon and Washington State Aviation Manager 

and/or State Fire Management Officer. 

This document has been designed as an easy-to-read reference guide for law enforcement officers 

in the Bureau of Land Management Oregon and Washington who have the need to utilize aircraft 

to complete their law enforcement mission.

References are incorporated to include policy from other documents (i.e., OPM-11, National

Aviation Plan, etc.). Most of the references are hyperlinked to provide ease of access to the

original document.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

155

1 Oregon and Washington BLM –Law Enforcement Aviation Operations Supplement

1.1 Introduction

1.2 Purpose

2 Organizations

2.1 Management Positions

2.2 Aviation Position Definitions

3 Aviation Operations

3.1 Law Enforcement Operations

3.2 BLM Employees on Cooperator Aircraft

3.3 Exclusive Use Fire Contract Aircraft

3.4 Emergency Exception to Policy

3.5 Flight Following

3.6 Transportation of Hazardous Materials

3.7 Personnel Transport

3.8 Undercover Law Enforcement Operations

3.9 Search and Rescue (SAR) Flights

3.10 BLM Exclusive Use Aircraft

3.11 Sheriff Office / State Aircraft

3.12 New Program Requests

3.13 Participation in Existing Program

3.14 New Program

4 Aviation Safety

4.1 Aviation Life Support Equipment (ALSE)

4.2 Project Aviation Safety Planning

5 Aviation Training

5.1 Interagency Aviation Training (IAT)

5.2 NWCG Aviation Training

5.3 Additional Aviation Training

Appendix 1: Aviation Mission Planning Document

Appendix 2: Aviation Memorandums of Understanding and Cooperator Letters of Agreements

Appendix 3: Reference Material
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

156

1. Oregon and Washington BLM – Law Enforcement Aviation

Supplement

1.1 Introduction

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Office of Law Enforcement and Security (OLES) - 

Region 2 (OR, WA, IS, AK), supports resource management within Oregon and Washington, 

and works cooperatively with county, state, and other Federal agencies. Due to the nature of law 

enforcement field operations, lead time for project planning often is not sufficient to meet normal 

Oregon and Washington BLM aviation project planning and approval standards as described in 

the Oregon and Washington BLM SAP. Typically, these situations occur when other agencies 

enlist cooperator support from BLM OLES and those agencies have full operational control of all 

aviation resources.

The Department of Interior (DOI), Office of Aviation Services (OAS) has issued Information

Bulletin 13-04, dated May 8, 2013 that identifies and clarifies DOI Bureau responsibilities in the 

implementation of and use of Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) between DOI and various 

agencies to include: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Department of Defense (DOD) - 

National Guard, U.S. Coast Guard, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection - Office of Air and 

Marine (CBP-OAM).

The majority of these MOU’s objective was to support joint operations for drug law enforcement. 

Currently only U.S. Coast Guard and the CBP-OAM have MOU’s which contain an operational 

scope beyond drug enforcement. MOUs with DEA, DOD, and National Guard only support the 

following drug law enforcement missions:

• Transporting DOI personnel for the purpose of locating and interdicting illicit drug 

activities

• Transporting contraband in the custody of DOI law enforcement agents from public 

and tribal lands.

• Training flights to improve coordination and tactical capabilities of/between DOI and 

National Guard participants

• Aerial surveillance of known or suspected drug activities.

1.2 Purpose

The purpose of this document is to enhance the safety of Oregon and Washington BLM/OLES 

personnel involved with aviation and to set up operational procedures that improve the

efficiency of project planning, approval, and field operations while ensuring compliance with DOI 

and OLES policy.

The objectives of this supplement are to provide direction for Oregon and Washington BLM and 

OLES R-2 employees regarding the law enforcement aviation program and activities. This 

supplement will serve as the OLES PASP/MASP in combination with a Mission Planning sheet 

and/or form 9400-1a for routine low complexity OLES aviation field operations. This supplement 

is similar to BLM Fire and Aviation base operating plans (i.e., helitack, air tanker base) that 

allow those functions to conduct identified routine field operations without the formal 

PASP/MASP development and approval process. However, in place of the PASP/MASP a 

9400-1a (or Mission Planning Sheet) must be completed. (See pg. 11).
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

157

2. Organizations

2.1 Management Positions

2.1.1 State Director

The State Director has overall responsibility for the aviation program, which is delegated to the 

SFMO.

2.1.2 Special Agent-in-Charge, BLM OLES Region 2 (OR, WA)

The Special Agent-in-Charge (SAC) has overall responsibility for law enforcement in Oregon and 

Washington and is an approving official for the SAP which is a parent to this document.

2.1.3 Assistant Special Agent-in-Charge (ASAC), State Chief Ranger (SCR)

The SCR and ASAC have delegated responsibilities from the SAC. The SCR/ASAC is an 

approving official for PASPs in Oregon and Washington BLM.

2.1.4 State Aviation Manager

The SAM serves as the focal point for the aviation program and provides technical and 

management expertise regarding the use of aviation resources.

2.1.5 District Manager

The DM has overall responsibility for aviation activities conducted within the district. Aviation 

management and operational authorities and responsibilities are delegated to the district FMO, 

UAM/UAO, and dispatch center manager.

2.1.6 UAM/UAO

The UAM/UAO serves as the focal point for the district aviation program.

2.2 Aviation Position Definitions

2.2.1 Aircrew Members

Aircrew members are classified for BLM aviation operations as those persons who are trained 

and qualified to perform an active mission function during the flight on an aircraft under BLM 

operational control. Aircrew members are not classified as passengers. An aircrew member is 

someone considered essential to ensure the safety and successful outcome of the mission.

2.2.2 Passenger

Any person aboard an aircraft who does not perform the function of a flight crew/pilot or aircrew 

member. Passengers must receive a briefing by an aircrew member for all special use missions. 

Additionally, an aircrew member is required to be on board or to attend to the loading and 

unloading of passengers and cargo at all landings and takeoffs to ensure the safety of the 

passengers for all special use missions.

2.2.3 Aircraft Manager

The aircraft managers include fixed wing and helicopter personnel who have been trained and 

qualified to manage aircraft operations. Each manager complies with their appropriate
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

158

interagency standards document as applicable and is responsible for completing workflow 

obligations for flight invoices.

2.2.4 Flight Manager

The flight manager is the government representative who ensures compliance with procurement 

document requirements and is responsible for coordinating the flight(s).
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

159

3. Aviation Operations

As a bureau, we are often challenged with working in high-risk and dynamic environments that 

are not always predictable. It is the responsibility of each employee, cooperator, and contractor 

to conduct aviation operations that have been planned properly and approved by management. 

It is important to utilize the correct equipment and properly trained and qualified personnel to 

minimize risk.

a. Law Enforcement Operations

LE personnel involved in any aviation operation will adhere to DOI and bureau aviation policy. 

Local LE personnel who are required to utilize aircraft to support LE operations shall discuss all 

aspects of the operation with the UAM/UAO or SAM, in advance of operations. The UAM/UAO 

will review all LE PASP/MASPs, Mission Plan Sheet, and/or 9400-1a (or Mission Planning 

Sheet) prior to commencing operations. Line officers shall be informed of LE aviation activities 

within their area of responsibility.

All aircraft ordering must be done through approved personnel. Aviation Managers and Aircraft 

Dispatchers can order contract aircraft services through IBC-AQD. Cooperator aircraft do not fall

under this process. All cooperator aircraft are under the operational control of other agencies and 

are not restricted to DOI regulations for ordering.

b. BLM Employees on Cooperator Aircraft

Use of Cooperator aircraft and pilots; affiliate, state/local government, military, or other federal 

agency aircraft by BLM employees may require prior inspection and approval by OAS. This 

approval will be in the form of a Letter of Approval (LOA) and/or Memorandum of Understanding 

(MOU). Utilizing a cooperator aircraft that does not have documented approval (i.e., MOU, LOA, 

etc.) is not authorized.

Oregon and Washington BLM currently have MOUs in place. To check the currency of a 

particular MOU, contact the SAM or visit https://www.doi.gov/aviation/library/mou

3.2.1 Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) MOU

Currently BLM has an MOU with DEA (last updated 11/20/91). DOI employees may be 

transported by DEA aircraft under DEA operational control under the following circumstances:

• Employee who are trained and authorized to perform law enforcement duties 

may be transported in DOI and DEA aircraft during joint law enforcement 

missions.

• During non-law enforcement activities, employees may be transported in DOI and 

DEA aircraft when required to complete joint missions. Example: BLM to locate 

land boundaries or assist in locating areas of marijuana growth, etc.

• Non-law enforcement missions may be accomplished as necessary when 

approved by DEA and DOI enforcement first line supervisors. All DEA pilots and 

crew members must meet or exceed the qualification standards established by 

DEA. Pilots must have 500 hours in category of aircraft, or the mission request 

will be refused.

3.2.2 Department of Defense (DoD) MOU
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

160

Currently BLM has an MOU with DoD (last updated 6/25/90). DOI employees may be 

transported by DoD aircraft under DoD operational control for DOI missions intended to detect 

and interdict illegal drug activities, under the following conditions:

• Transporting DOI law enforcement personnel and essential equipment as approved 

jointly by the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) and the Attorney General (AG).

• Transporting contraband in the custody of DOI law enforcement agents as approved 

jointly by the SECDEF and the AG.

• Training flights to assist DOI and other law enforcement personnel in preparing for 

drug enforcement missions as approved jointly by the SECDEF and the AG.

• Aerial reconnaissance of areas of known or suspected drug activities.

All DoD flights with DOI personnel on board require that at minimum one pilot has 500 hours in 

category of aircraft, or the mission request will be refused. Operational request, as listed above, 

that require SECDEF and AG approval must be routed through SAC and/or SAM.

Reference MOU regarding flight time documentation requirements

3.2.3 National Guard (NG) MOU

Currently BLM has multiple MOU with various National Guard (NG) units, by state. DOI 

employees may be transported by participating NG aircraft for joint missions intended to detect 

and interdict illegal drug activities, under the following conditions:

• Transporting DOI personnel for the purpose of locating and interdicting illicit drug 

activities.

• Transporting contraband in custody of DOI law enforcement agents from the public 

lands.

• Training flights to improve coordination and tactical capabilities of DOI and National 

Guard participants.

• Aerial surveillance of known or suspected drug activities.

When transporting DOI personnel, the National Guard will assure the Pilot in Command (PIC) 

has a minimum of 500 hours pilot time experience, or the mission request will be refused.

A list of current NG MOU by state, can be found at: https://www.doi.gov/aviation/library/mou_ng

The following States do not have a NG MOU:

Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maryland, Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania, and 

Virginia.

Please reference MOU for additional considerations it contains, to include planning 

requirements, regulations for weapons and ammunition, flight documentation, and more. The 

requirement for pilots to have a minimum of 500 hours pilot time experience, as stated in above 

context, is the responsibility of the participating agency. If there is question regarding this 

requirement, contact your aviation manager to help confirm compliance.

All agency employees will comply with bureau and DOI aviation policies when conducting 

missions on board any organization’s aircraft, to include those aircraft under the operational 

control of another organization. These policies include but are not limited to; approved aircraft 

and pilot(s), PASPs, flight following, PPE, and appropriate management approvals.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

161

Exceptions are:

• Undercover law enforcement missions. (Ref: 351 DM 1.6.D)

• PPE exceptions for law enforcement short haul (Ref: DOI Law Enforcement Short 

Haul Policy) Utilizing a cooperator aircraft that does not have documented approval 

(i.e. MOU, LOA, etc.) is not authorized. Use of these aircraft outside of policy could 

have serious consequences. If you are not sure if an aircraft is approved, contact your 

aviation manager for clarification before you fly.

a. EU Fire Contract Aircraft

Law enforcement may use BLM EU contracted fire aircraft to conduct missions that are nonthreatening. Concerning the safety of the aircraft, the Pilot has the final authority to determine

what is threatening or non-threatening. The use of fire aircraft must be during the exclusive 

period of contract. The aircraft will not be released from contract for law enforcement missions 

without prior SAM approval and concurrence of Contracting Officer.

Operations conducted by EU helitack crew will require a PASP/MASP and/or 9400-1a (or 

Mission Planning Sheet) to be completed and signed.

b. Emergency Exception to Policy

Federal employees who are involved in an event in which there clearly exists an imminent threat 

to human life, and there is insufficient time to utilize approved methods, may deviate from policy 

to the extent necessary to preserve life. The following provisions and follow-up actions apply:

i. Personnel involved are expected to use good judgment.

ii. Personnel involved in the decision making associated with deviating from 

policy must weigh the risks verses benefit.

iii. Any deviations shall be documented on a SAFECOM.

b. Flight Following

Flight following is required for all flights. There are several methods by which flight following 

may be accomplished dependent on the type of flight being taken. PASP/MASP’s, Mission 

Planning Sheet and/or 9400-1a (or Mission Planning Sheet) should include details regarding 

how flight following will be conducted.

3.3.1 Point-to-Point Flight Following

Point-to-point is defined as a flight that originates at one developed airport or permanent 

helibase and flies directly to another developed airport or permanent helibase with the sole 

purpose of transporting personnel or cargo. A point-to-point flight is conducted higher than 500 

feet above ground level (AGL). Point-to-point flights will be tracked by a FAA – visual flight rules 

(VFR) or instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan. The pilot is responsible for filing the flight plan. 

A 9400-1a will be utilized to provide dispatch with the appropriate aircraft and pilot information, 

a passenger manifest, and an estimated time of departure and arrival for all missions under 

BLM operational control.

3.3.2 Mission Flight Following

Mission flight is defined as any flight other than point-to-point, conducted with the express 

purpose of performing an agency or resource management related task or tactical job. DOI 

refers to many such missions as “Special Use.” Aircraft and Pilots must be approved for each 

specific activity prior to use. Agency flight plans are required for mission flights and will be
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

162

document in PASP/MASP, Mission Planning Sheet and/or on a 9400-1a (or Mission Planning 

Sheet). Mission flight following is accomplished by flight crews and agency dispatchers using 

positive two-way communication, via Automated Flight Following (AFF) system, or by agency 

personnel on the scene of an incident or project where the aircraft is operating. Mission flight 

following is required for all missions under BLM operational control. Flights that are not under 

BLM operational control, which are conducted under MOU or LOA, will follow guidelines of the 

specific authorizing document.

d. Transportation of Hazardous Materials

Transportation of hazardous materials aboard agency contracted aircraft must meet the 

requirements set forth in the NWCG Standards for Aviation Transport of Hazardous Materials.

3.4.1 Small Arms Ammunition

Law enforcement officers may transport small arms ammunition in aircraft that are under the 

exclusive direction and control of DOI or USFS. Loaded weapons will be transported in aircraft 

only when the mission dictates their use in flight or soon after landing. Small arms ammunition 

may be carried on aircraft if contained in original package, box, pack, or manufactured container 

designed for transporting ammunition. (Manufacture container examples include magazine, belt 

container designed to hold magazine or clip, etc.).

3.4.2 Defensive Aerosols

Law enforcement officers may carry defensive aerosols in a duty belt or similar protective 

device in aircraft that are under the exclusive direction and control of DOI or USFS. There is no 

requirement that hazard communication marking be in place. However, all hazardous materials 

must be declared to the pilot prior to flight.

3.4.3 Training Requirements

Training in the proper handling of a hazardous material must be completed by each person who 

loads or unloads hazardous materials on aircraft. The DOI approved training course that meets 

requirements is A-110 Aviation Transportation of Hazardous Materials. The online course is 

available on the Interagency Aviation Training website.

a. Personnel Transport

The following guidelines should be followed when transporting personnel. The Pilot always has 

the final authority to approve these transports and must be consulted prior to flight operations.

3.5.1 Transport of Injured Officers

Prior to transporting an officer with serious injuries, all weapons being carried by the injured 

officer shall be secured by another law enforcement officer.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

163

3.5.2 Transport of Canines

All canines should be either muzzled and restrained or constrained in a secured portable 

carrier. Canines shall be transported in the rear of the aircraft and be accompanied by a 

handler. When transporting during LESH operations, follow direction provided in DOI Short Haul 

Policy.

3.5.3 Transport of Prisoners

When prisoners are transported by aircraft, ensure that the pilot is briefed on the prisoner and 

extent of crimes. Prisoner must be briefed on aircraft safety and procedures. Search the 

prisoner for weapons even if the prisoner has been previously searched. Handcuff the prisoner 

using standard law enforcement policy and procedures. Seat the prisoner next to LEO in rear of 

aircraft where he has no access to the pilot or controls.

a. Aerial Recon (Marijuana Spotting) Missions

Law enforcement officers may utilize aircraft to support looking for and identifying illegal 

marijuana grows on Federal lands. Both fixed wing and helicopters may be utilized depending 

on availability and mission requirements. These missions may fall under the category of “Covert 

Operations” (see section 5.10). If an officer deems the mission to be “Covert Operations”, it 

must be authorized by special agent in charge (SAC) or assistant special agent in Charge 

(ASAC) or state chief ranger (SCR) in concurrence with UAM or SAM. DOI Employees, who 

take part in this mission profile, when it is not categorized as “Covert Operations”, must adhere

to all applicable DOI Policy.

3.6.1 BLM Contracted Aircraft

BLM EU (see section 5.3) or on-call contracted aircraft may be used to conduct recon for the 

purpose of spotting marijuana. A completed 9400-1a (or Mission Planning Sheet) must be 

reviewed and approved by UAM/UAO (SAM if there are multiple districts involved) prior to flight. 

Dispatch must be provided with 9400-1a (or Mission Planning Sheet) prior to flight and be 

briefed with appropriate information to conduct flight following and support operations. A map or 

detailed description of the general area to be flown must be attached to the 9400-1a (or Mission 

Planning Sheet). There must be a qualified aircraft manager (appropriate to type aircraft and 

mission profile) either at departure and destination locations or on board the aircraft during the 

operation (see section 6.1). All applicable PPE will be worn during flight operations (see section 

4.1) in accordance with the Aviation Life Support Equipment (ALSE) Handbook.

3.6.2 Cooperator Aircraft

BLM law enforcement officers may fly onboard cooperator aircraft during recon missions for the 

purpose of spotting marijuana, given that the proper approval is in place (LOA or MOU – see 

section 3.2). A completed 9400-1a (or Mission Planning Sheet) must be reviewed and approved 

by UAM/UAO (SAM if there are multiple districts involved) prior to flight. Flight following must be 

conducted using an approved method (see section 3.5). A map or detailed description of the 

general area to be flown must be attached to the 9400-1a (or Mission Planning Sheet). BLM 

employees flying on cooperator aircraft during spotting mission is an aircrew member and must 

be qualified and current in this position (see
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

164

section 5.1.3). All applicable PPE will be worn during flight operations (see section 4.1) in 

accordance with the ALSE Handbook.

Recon missions (above 500’) are generally considered to be low risk and routine. However, 

missions conducted at low level (below 500’ AGL) during any point outside of take- offs/landings 

is “Special Use.” A PASP/MASP may be required depending upon the complexity and 

associated risk of a “Special Use” flight mission. Consult the district UAM/UAO/UAO for help in 

determining if a PASP/MASP or Mission Planning Sheet is needed.

a. Undercover Law Enforcement Operations

BLM employees involved in undercover LE operations are authorized to use unapproved aircraft 

and pilots during the covert phase of an operation provided the activity is essential to the 

accomplishment of the mission. Such use must be consistent with the undercover operating 

policy and practices of BLM law enforcement.

Undercover LE operations involving the use of non-approved aircraft will be reported to SAM 

upon completion.

b. Search and Rescue (SAR) Flights

The use of BLM aircraft and aviation personnel for SAR operations are not considered normally 

planned BLM operations. SAR is typically the responsibility of the Sheriff’s Office. BLM does not 

budget for SAR operations. However, each situation and request are different and will be 

authorized based on the specific details and need for each event. It is important to obtain 

approval at the appropriate level prior to using aviation resources for SAR operations.

c. BLM EU Aircraft

Request for BLM aircraft to assist is typically routed through BLM law enforcement officials to 

the DM. Aircraft and crew that have been contracted for EU by the BLM will not be released 

from their contract for non-agency SAR operations. Law enforcement officers (LEO’s) should 

work with UAMs and/or SAM to ensure proper procedures and policy is followed.

d. Sheriff Office / State Aircraft

On occasion BLM law enforcement may be requested to support SAR operations using 

cooperator or private aircraft. BLM employees must not fly on a non-approved aircraft. BLM 

LEO’s should stay within the scope of policy, MOUs, and/or LOA’s (example: DOI has an MOU 

with the Oregon and Washington National Guard which allows LEO’s to fly on NG aircraft.

Federal employees who are involved in an event in which there clearly exists an imminent threat 

to human life, and there is insufficient time to utilize approved methods, may deviate from policy 

to the extent necessary to preserve life. (ref. NAP 5.6 and 350 DM 1.3.B)

e. New Program Requests

Aviation is a dynamic environment in which technology and best practices are continually 

evolving. There may be an opportunity to improve efficiency, safety, or other aspects of 

operations by starting a new program or participating in an existing program for the first time.

f. Participation in Existing Program

Prior to joining operations where complex aviation programs are being utilized, it is important 

that proper approval and training is received. If you desire to participate in an existing aviation
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

165

program (i.e., short haul, rappel, fast rope, hoist, etc.), you must have supervisor approval to 

forward the request through ASAC or SAM to appropriate decision authority. Depending on the 

amount of risk involved with the program, the state director and/or R-3 SAC may need to 

approve participation. Participating in activities without prior consent may place you outside the 

scope of your employment and could create potential for accident or injury.

g. New Program

Starting a new program consists of identifying the need and developing a proposal. Work with 

the ASAC or SCR to develop the proposal. All new program proposals will be reviewed by 

Oregon and Washington BLM SAM, who will give guidance in routing proposal for consideration 

to the appropriate management levels.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

166

4. Aviation Safety

The BLM Aviation Safety program is modeled after the aviation industry and FAA Safety 

Management Systems (SMS). Each BLM employee and contractor involved with aviation has 

the responsibility to plan missions thoroughly, conduct missions with a conservative attitude,

and respect for the aircraft and environment in which the missions operate. Both employees and 

contractors have the responsibility to speak up when unsafe operations are observed.

a. Aviation Life Support Equipment (ALSE)

All personnel engaged in aviation activities must wear appropriate Personal Protective 

Equipment (PPE), depending on the mission. The ALSE Handbook is policy and must be 

followed unless a waiver is authorized. All waivers will be in writing, specific, and signed by 

authorized authority.

• Point to Point Operations

Flights which are conducted between developed airports, are point to point operations. 

These flights must not contain any deviation in flight route or special pilot skills. Point to 

point flights should remain 500’ Above Ground Level (AGL) during all phases of flight 

outside of take-off and landing.

• All Helicopter flights will follow ALSE requirements of “Special Use Operations” (see 

4.1.2)

• Fixed Wing operations which are considered Point to Point do not require any ALSE

• Special Use Operations

Operations which do not fall under point-to-point flight and are typically conducted less 

than 500’ AGL are “Special Use” operations. Flight crewmembers and aircrew members 

engaged in special use activities are required to wear the following ALSE unless exempted 

(see 4.1.3).

• Flight helmet

• Fire-resistant clothing

• Fire –resistant flight gloves. All leather gloves are and approved substitution for firefighter and non-flight crewmember and aircrew members

• Leather or approved non-leather boot

If possibility exists that a planned flight will deviate from above 500’ AGL to below 500’ 

AGL, the above PPE should be worn (unless otherwise exempted or waived).

• Exceptions/Waivers

For exceptions to ALSE Policy exist (ref. ALSE Handbook 1.5.A).

• Personal protective equipment (PPE) is not required, but is recommended, for 

flights conducted entirely (less takeoff and landing) above 500 feet AGL in 

airplanes, such as resource recon, fire recon, and air tactical use.

If a Bureau identifies an ALSE requirement that presents a concern affecting employee 

safety or security, then DOI Bureau Directors have discretionary authority to grant a 

waiver. This authority may be exercised by the Bureau Director or by written delegation at 

a lower authority level. Bureau Directors may exercise this authority by providing a copy of 

the waiver and any written delegation to OAS Aviation Safety and Evaluations Division and 

appropriate OAS Regional Director. Waivers will specify safety or security concern, the 

requirement being waived, the duration and dates of waiver, risk mitigations in lieu of the 

prescribed ALSE and supporting rationale. Deviations from PPE require approval through
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

167

exceptions as listed in this document or written request to ASAC which includes risk 

evaluation and identified mitigations. ASAC will forward waiver requests to the SAM for 

proper routing.

Some exceptions are authorized through approval of policy in a Guide, Handbook, or 

similar document. An example of this is the law enforcement short haul policy where 

exceptions to standard PPE are described (see 4.1.4).

• DOI Law Enforcement Short haul (LESH) PPE Exceptions

During LESH operations, DOI LEO shall wear personal protective equipment (PPE) as 

specified in DOI LESH Policy – Chapter 3. No other exceptions shall be permitted. For 

flights other than the tactical extraction of LEO, DOI personnel will wear aviation life 

support equipment as specified above in Special Use Operations (see 4.1.2).

For flights involving tactical extraction of 5 miles or less, LEO may wear either approved 

tactical LESH ALSE as defined below or may wear the ALSE specified above in Special 

Use Operations (see 4.1.2).

Exceptions to DOI ALSE as specified in DOI LESH Policy – Chapter 3 are as follows:

4.1.4.1 Helmet

LEO shall wear a subdued color tactical helmet meeting Union International Alpine Association 

(UIAA) or “CE” standards, or Kevlar ballistic helmet with four-point suspension or approved 

aviator’s helmet while being transported externally via DOI LESH Policy.

4.1.4.2 Eye Protection

LEO will wear agency-approved goggles or glasses meeting mil spec or American National 

Standards Institute (ANSI) spec protection requirements over the eyes with a retainer strap in 

place during all flight operations while wearing other-than-approved aviator helmets.

4.1.4.3 Personal Protective Clothing

Due to the increased safety concerns of LEO once they have been inserted into the law 

enforcement situation, they are granted a waiver to the policy of wearing Nomex-type fire resistant

clothing, while engaged in training for and conducting ground tactical law enforcement operations. 

All outer clothing should be made of 100% natural fibers, such as 100% cotton military-style 

tactical uniforms; however, due to the short service life, limited utility and difficulty of procurement, 

cotton/polyester blend uniforms are permitted.

Undergarments of natural fiber (i.e., 100% cotton, 100% wool, etc.) are preferred. Moisturewicking/skin-temperature-reducing synthetic undergarments may be worn by LEO operating in 

environments where heat stress to the officers is expected.

4.1.4.4 Gloves

LEO’s being short hauled are at a reduced risk from post-crash thermal injuries and, 

simultaneously, must maintain the dexterity to fire their weapons if the tactical situation dictates. 

Therefore, LEO may, at their discretion, wear Nomex flight gloves or any glove made of 100% 

natural materials, to include fingerless-style gloves.

4.1.4.5 Boots
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

168

Military flight-approved leather/cordura nylon combination boots may be worn by LEO and other 

onsite LESH LEO.

LEO shall be advised prior to the commencement of each LESH operation of the increased 

danger to them in the event of an accident if they are not wearing a full complement of aviation 

life support equipment (ALSE) per the DOI ALSE Handbook as listed in Special Use Operations 

(see 4.1.2). 

These exceptions are specific to the activity as described in the document and do not give 

permission to deviate from ALSE requirements in any other situation.

a. Project Planning

All Law Enforcement flights require project planning prior to implementation. The level of 

planning and approval depends on complexity, scale of the project, and level of associated risk.

4.2.1 PASP/MASP

A PASP/MASP is required prior to all law enforcement aviation flights. The size and detail of the 

PASP/MASP should be proportionate with the complexity of the project. For templates and 

guidance on completing a PASP/MASP, contact the UAM/UAO/UAO on the district that the 

flight will occur. The following components must be included in the plan:

• Project name/Objectives/Supervision

• Justification

• Project date and location

• Projected cost of aviation resources and funding code(s)

• Desired aircraft, make/model, pilot skills (Included if available and/or specific N# and 

pilot to be noted on 9400-1a or Mission Planning sheet )

• Communication Plan, Flight following and emergency search and rescue

• Flight routes/areas and altitudes

• Hazard identification (e.g., weather, takeoff or landing weights, landing areas, wire 

hazards, etc.)

• Wire Strike Prevention (352DM1.9.D)

• Flight Environment Considerations: Bureau projects often dictate that flights be 

conducted near the ground where wires are prevalent

• Risk Assessment/Hazard Maps: To reduce wire strike potential, it is critical that a risk 

assessment be conducted prior to all low-level flights. A low-level flight hazard map 

must be constructed for the local operational area. All preplanned low-level flights 

require a thorough map reconnaissance of the route to be flown

• Description of take-off and landing areas

• Pre-flight briefings/After Action Reviews

• Participants: List individuals involved in flights, their qualifications (HMGB, Aircrew 

Member, Passenger, etc.) dates of last aviation training and include individual’s 

project responsibilities

• Aircraft and equipment approval

• Airspace Coordination and aerial hazard identification

• Risk assessment utilizing the SMS worksheets as appropriate

• Personal protective clothing/equipment (if required)

• Load calculations and/or weight and balance information requirements

• UAMs/UAO review and signature (within 12 months if reoccurring project)

• Project Lead Supervisor’s and line officer’s approval signature (within 12 months if 

reoccurring project) Aircraft Flight Request Form (9400-1a)

Low complexity single day projects may utilize the 9400- 1a (or Mission Planning Sheet) form in 
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

169

place of a formal PASP/MASP. A Mission Planning Sheet is considered equivalent to the 9400- 

1a when used in connection with an approved reoccurring PASP/MASP. These forms document

the required components of an aviation safety plan. When using this form as a stand-alone 

document, both front and back pages must be completed and a signature from an authorized 

manager is required.

Additionally, the 9400-1a (or Mission Planning Sheet) form may be used in conjunction with a 

PASP/MASP for projects that occur periodically over a season or fiscal year. In this situation a 

PASP/MASP is prepared and approved to cover all similar flights in a span of time. The 9400-

1a (or Mission Planning Sheet) form will be required for each periodic flight associated with that 

one time PASP/MASP. When using the form in conjunction with a PASP/MASP only the front 

page must be completed, and no additional signatures are required. The approval of the 9400-

1a in this case would be at the UAM/UAO level, with a courtesy copy provided to the SAM.

All low complexity “Special Use” flights will require a line officer signature on the 9400-1a (or 

Mission Planning Sheet). Exception to this is when the 9400-1a (or Mission Planning Sheet) is 

used to support a PASP/MASP that has already been approved and signed by a line officer.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

170

5. Aviation Training

Aviation training is essential to ensure that BLM maintains a safe and efficient aviation operation 

in pursuit of the bureaus mission. Aviation users, supervisors, and managers need to make 

certain that they and their employees are knowledgeable of the inherent hazards of aviation 

operations and have been provided the necessary skills and training to be successful 

conducting aviation operations.

a. Interagency Aviation Training (IAT)

The OAS is responsible for all DOI aviation training. Training is conducted and managed using

the Interagency Aviation Training website. All aviation users and their supervisors should have

an account on this system. Required training for employees is based on aviation roles and is 

as follows:

5.1.1 Supervisor

DOI personnel that supervise employees who use aircraft to accomplish bureau programs must 

complete aviation training. It is the responsibility of the supervisor to ensure that employees who 

use aircraft are doing so in a safe and appropriate manner. Supervisors must attend the 

following training and maintain currency per DOI Policy (OPM-04): 

• M-3 Aviation Management for Supervisors (every three years)

• A-200 Mishap Review (every three years)

5.1.2 Passenger

Any person aboard an aircraft who does not perform the function of a flight crew/pilot or aircrew 

member. Passengers are not required to take any training prior to taking flight. However, every 

passenger must receive a safety briefing from the pilot or designated aircrew member.

Additionally, an aircrew member must be present to load and unload passengers from the 

aircraft at each departure/destination location.

5.1.3 Aircrew Member/Hazmat

Employee working in and around aircraft and is essential to ensuring the safety and successful 

outcome of the mission. Aircrew Members must complete the following training and maintain 

currency per DOI Policy (OPM-04): 

• A-100 Basic Aviation Safety (every three years)

• A-200 Mishap Review (every three years)

• A-110 Aviation Transportation of HAZMAT (every three years)

• A-116 General Awareness Security Training (one time only)

5.1.4 Fixed Wing Flight Manager

Government representative who works jointly with the pilot-in- command and aircrew members 

to ensure safe, efficient flight management on point-to-point flights. Fixed Wing Flight Managers 

must complete the following training and maintain currency per DOI Policy (OPM- 04): 

• A-100 Basic Aviation Safety (every three years)

• A-109 Aviation Radio Use (one time only)

• A-110 Aviation Transportation of HAZMAT (if applicable, every three years)

• A-112 Mission Planning and Flight Request Process (every three years)

• A-116 General Awareness Security Training (one time only)

• A-200 Mishap Review (every three years)
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

171

5.1.5 Fixed Wing Flight Manager (Special Use)

Government representative who works jointly with the pilot-in-command and aircrew members to 

ensure safe, efficient flight management of missions other than point-to-point flying i.e., 

reconnaissance below 500’ AGL, aerial photo, or any other special use mission. Fixed wing 

flight manager (special use) must complete the following training and maintain currency per DOI 

Policy (OPM-04): 

• A-100 Basic Aviation Safety (every three years)

• A-109 Aviation Radio Use (one time only)

• A-110 Aviation Transportation of HAZMAT (if applicable, every three years)

• A-112 Mission Planning and Flight Request Process (every three years)

• A-115 Automated Flight Following (one time only)

• A-116 General Awareness Security Training (one time only)

• A-200 Mishap Review (every three years)

• A-204 Aircraft Capabilities and Limitations (one time only)

• A-205 Risk Management I (one time only)

• A-218 Aircraft Pre-use Inspection (one time only)

• A-302 Personal Responsibility and Liability (one time only)

• A-303 Human Factors in Aviation (one time only)

• A-310 Overview of Crew Resource Management (one time only)

5.1.6 Helicopter Flight Manager

Government representative who supervises missions such as transport of personnel from one 

developed heliport/airport to another developed heliport/airport, low- and high-level 

reconnaissance, and landings or takeoffs at unimproved landing sites. Helicopter flight manager 

must complete the following training and maintain currency per DOI Policy (OPM- 04): 

• A-100 Basic Aviation Safety (every three years)

• A-109 Aviation Radio Use (one time only)

• A-110 Aviation Transportation of HAZMAT (if applicable, every three years)

• A-112 Mission Planning and Flight Request Process (one time only)

• A-115 Automated Flight Following (one time only)

• A-116 General Awareness Security Training (one time only)

• A-200 Mishap Review (every three years)

• A-204 Aircraft Capabilities and Limitations (one time only)

• A-205 Risk Management I (one time only)

• A-209 Helicopter Operations (one time only)

Individuals holding a current qualification under IQCS are also qualified to perform equivalent 

non-fire aviation positions under IAT guidelines. (See next section)

a. NWCG Aviation Training

Fire and Aviation training is conducted under the authority of the National Wildfire Coordination 

Group (NWCG) and is tracked in the Incident Qualification and Certification System (IQCS).

Many aviation qualifications under this system are recognized as equivalent training and 

qualification to DOI IAT requirements. For a complete list of equivalent qualifications and 

training, you can reference those in the Interagency Aviation Training Guide under the position 

and training crosswalk matrixes.

5.2.1 Helicopter Crewmember

Helicopter Crewmembers work in conjunction with the Pilot-in-command to ensure safe and 

efficient operations. Training for this position requires attendance in S-271 Helicopter
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

172

Crewmember training. Qualification requires that a Position Task Book be completed under the 

supervision of a qualified Helicopter Crewmember. This position is equivalent to the following 

IAT positions:

• Aircrew Member

5.2.2 Helicopter Manager

Helicopter Managers work in conjunction with the Pilot-in-command to ensure safe and efficient 

operations. This position is also instrumental in representing the Government’s best interest in 

contract compliance and administrative areas (i.e., payment documentation, daily diaries, etc.). 

Training for this position requires attendance in S-372 Helicopter Manager training. Qualification 

requires that a Position Task Book be completed under the supervision of a qualified Helicopter 

Manager. This position is equivalent to the following IAT positions:

• Aircrew Member

• Fixed Wing Flight Manager

• Helicopter Flight Manager

• Resource Helicopter Manager

Helicopter Crewmembers or Helicopter Managers that do not have fixed wing 

experience/qualifications must take A-100 in addition to maintaining IQCS qualification when 

involved with fixed wing aircraft.

a. Additional Aviation Training

In addition to standard IAT or NWCG training to meet qualifications, there are additional 

trainings required to participate in some special use helicopter missions. The training listed 

below is in addition to required training to work in and around aircraft (i.e., A-100, S-271, etc.)

5.3.1 Law Enforcement Short Haul

BLM LEO’s participation in law enforcement short haul missions in Oregon and Washington are 

limited to coordinated missions with C.E.R.T. for Marijuana Eradication. All LEO’s will complete 

training per the requirements in DOI Law Enforcement Short Haul Policy (version 1.7, 2011).

5.3.2 External Load Operations

BLM requires that personnel involved with helicopter external load operations must comply with 

the following:

• All personnel involved in hover hook ups must complete S-271 and A-219 units 1-6 

• All personnel involved in long line work must be a qualified aircrew member and 

complete A-219 units 1-4 and unit 6.

• Documentation, for non-fire personnel, indicating the completion of the required 

training to perform external load work shall be maintained on the Interagency Aviation

Training website.

• OPM-04 does not require any recurrent training for A-219, and thus bureau 

employees will not need any further external load training. However, the skills 

associated with external load operations are perishable. Law enforcement personnel 

who wish to participate in external load operations should strive to maintain 

proficiency or otherwise not participate without supervision.
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

173

Appendix 1: Aviation Mission Planning Document

Helicopter Missions

Requirement

P.P.E. Flight Approval Additional

Following

Document

Documentation

National Guard Yes Yes MOU (current) *Report Flight Hours

Drug Mission

National Guard

Yes Yes

LOA

***

9400-1a

PASP/MASP

*Report Flight Hours Non-Drug Mission

BLM/USFS Contract

Yes Yes

Contract

9400-

1a

PASP

Payment Documentation

DEA/CBP Drug

Yes Yes

MOU(current)

9400-1a

PASP

*Report Flight Hours Mission

DEA/CBP Non- Drug

Yes Yes

MOU (current) 9400-1A

Mission PASP *Report Flight Hours

DOD Drug Mission

Yes Yes

MOU(current)

9400-1a

PASP

*Report Flight Hours

Short Haul Yes,Per

LESH

Policy

Yes DOI LESH Policy

PASP

*Report Flight Hours

(w/ CERT)

State Police or Yes No **Life Threatening SAFECOM

Sheriff’s Office

*Report flight hours to UAM/UAO or SAM upon completion of associated flights

**In case of life-threatening emergency where LEO is essential to the successful outcome of the mission

***National Guard non-drug mission is outside DOI MOU and requires specific Letter of Authorization

**** Does complexity require a formal PASP/MASP?

Fixed Wing Missions

Requirement

P.P.E. Flight

Following

Approval Document Additional

Documentation

BLM/USFS contract Above

500’

No

But recommended

Yes Contract 9400-1a Payment

Documentation

BLM/USFS contract Below

500’

Yes Yes Contract PASP Payment

Documentation

CBP Drug Mission Above

500’

No

But recommended

Yes MOU

(current)

9400-1a

*Report Flight Hours

CBP Drug Mission Below

500’

Yes Yes MOU

(current)

PASP

*Report Flight Hours

OtherCooperator

Aircraft

Above 500’

No

But recommended

Yes LOA 9400-1a *Report Flight Hours

Other

Cooperator

Aircraft

Below 500’

Yes Yes LOA PASP *Report Flight Hours

*Report flight hours to UAM or SAM upon completion of flights. Contact UAM or SAM to clarify any questions
BLM National and State Aviation Plan 

174

Appendix 10: Aviation Memorandums of Understanding and Cooperator Letters of Agreements

The following MOUs are in place and current. Please keep in mind when using an MOU that the 

scope of the document may be specific to one mission profile. In these cases, the MOU does 

not cover flights operated outside of the identified scope.

To check on the currency of these MOU’s please contact the SAM or visit the: OAS Aviation

MOU Library.

DEA/DOJ – MOU between DOI and DEA for joint law enforcement and non-law enforcement missions.

DOD – MOU between DOI and DOD for drug interdiction and eradication related missions.

ORNG – MOU between DOI and Oregon and Washington National Guard for drug interdiction related missions.

CBP/OAM – MOU between DOI and DHS, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Office of Air and

Marine.

USCG – MOU between DOI and DHS, U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Aviation Forces.

Appendix 11: Reference Material

BLM Aviation Website: https://www.nifc.gov/aviation/av_BLMaviation.html Office of Aviation

Services Website: https://www.doi.gov/aviation/

BLM National Aviation Plan: https://www.nifc.gov/aviation/BLMlibrary/NAP.pdf Oregon and 

Washington BLM State Aviation Plan: https://www.nifc.gov/aviation/BLMlibrary/UT_AP.pdf OAS

Information Bulletin 13-04:

https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/migrated/aviation/library/upload/IB_2013-04.pdf

9400-1a Flight Request/Schedule: https://www.nifc.gov/aviation/BLMadmin/AFR9400-1a.pdf

351 DM 1 Aviation Operations: https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/351dm1.pdf DOI

Law Enforcement Shorthaul Policy:

https://www.iat.gov/help/guides/DOI_Law_Enforcement_Short_Haul_Policy_2011_01.pdf NWCG

Standards for Aviation Transportation of Hazardous Materials:

https://www.nwcg.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pms513.pdf Aviation Life Support

Equipment Handbook:

https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/interagency_alse_handbook_v2.8.pdf

352 DM 1 Aviation Safety: https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/352dm1.pdf OAS 

OPM-04 Aviation User Training Program: https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/opm04.pdf