alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
97-100.

#### State v. Lacy.

Butler App. No. CA95-12-221. Reported at 78 Ohio St.3d 1439, 676 N.E.2d 1186. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and the discretionary appeal is allowed on Proposition of Law No. II only; *sua sponte,*cause held for the decision in 96-1871, *State v. Stowers,*Tuscarawas App. No. 94AP090066; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3270 

To include the county of Mohave, in the State of Arizona, as an affected 

area for purposes of making claims under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear testing. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2010 

Mr. MCCAIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To include the county of Mohave, in the State of Arizona, 

as an affected area for purposes of making claims under 

the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear testing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION UNDER THE RADIATION EXPOSURE 

4 COMPENSATION ACT. 

5 Section 4(b)(1)(C) of the Radiation Exposure Com6 pensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note) is amended by insert7 ing ‘‘Mohave,’’ after ‘‘Apache,’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2725 

To provide for fairness for the Federal judiciary. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 3, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. LEAHY, and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for fairness for the Federal judiciary. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Judicial Fair5 ness Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. JUDICIAL COST-OF-LIVING INCREASES. 

7 (a) REPEAL OF STATUTORY REQUIREMENT RELAT8 ING TO JUDICIAL SALARIES.—Section 140 of the resolu9 tion entitled ‘‘A Joint Resolution making further con10 tinuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1982, and for 

11 other purposes.’’, approved December 15, 1981 (Public 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2725 IS

1 Law 97–92; 95 Stat. 1200; 28 U.S.C. 461 note), is re2 pealed. 

3 (b) AUTOMATIC SALARY ADJUSTMENTS.—Section 

4 461(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended to read 

5 as follows: 

6 ‘‘(a) Effective at the beginning of the first applicable 

7 pay period commencing on or after the first day of the 

8 month in which an adjustment takes effect under sections 

9 5303 and 5304 of title 5 in the rates of pay under the 

10 General Schedule, each salary rate which is subject to ad11 justment under this section shall be adjusted by an 

12 amount, rounded to the nearest multiple of $100 (or, if 

13 midway between multiples of $100, to the next higher mul14 tiple of $100) equal to the percentage of such salary rate 

15 which corresponds to the overall average percentage of the 

16 adjustment in the rates of pay under the General Sched17 ule.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 4(a)11

	

 

U.S. $35,000,000

 

CREDIT AGREEMENT

Dated as November  24, 2003

 

Among

ENTERGY CORPORATION

as Borrower

THE BANKS NAMED HEREIN

as Banks

 

BAYERISCHE HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH

as Administrative Agent

BAYERISCHE HYPO- UND VEREINSBANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH

as Arranger

CREDIT AGREEMENT

Dated as of November 24, 2003

ENTERGY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "***Borrower*"), the banks (the "***Banks*") listed on the signature pages hereof and Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG, New York Branch ("***HypoVereinsbank*"), as administrative agent (the "***Administrative Agent*") for the Lenders hereunder, agree as follows:********
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,843]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 23, 2009, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Solar World, Vancouver, Washington.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of May 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13459 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
***NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION***

***MICS CLASS II - AUDIT CHECKLIST***

***INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & IT DATA (ITD)***

Page 2 of 9
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="Microsoft Word 97">
<TITLE>EX11-1</TITLE>
<META NAME="Template" CONTENT="C:\PROGRAM FILES\MICROSOFT OFFICE\OFFICE\html.dot">
</HEAD>
<BODY LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#800080">

<FONT FACE="Arial"><P>EXHIBIT 11.1</P>
<B><P ALIGN="CENTER">STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS<BR>
</B>(Millions of Canadian dollars)<BR>
(shares in millions)</P>
<P> </P></FONT>
<TABLE BORDER CELLSPACING=1 CELLPADDING=7 WIDTH=683>
<TR><TD WIDTH="75%" VALIGN="TOP"> </TD>
<TD WIDTH="25%" VALIGN="TOP" COLSPAN=2>
<B><FONT FACE="Arial"><P ALIGN="CENTER">First Quarter Ended<BR>
March 31,</B></FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD WIDTH="75%" VALIGN="TOP">
<B><FONT FACE="Arial"><P>BASIC</B></FONT></TD>
<TD WIDTH="13%" VALIGN="TOP">
<B><U><FONT FACE="Arial"><P ALIGN="RIGHT">2000</B></U></FONT></TD>
<TD WIDTH="11%" VALIGN="TOP">
<B><U><FONT FACE="Arial"><P ALIGN="RIGHT">1999</B></U></FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD WIDTH="75%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT FACE="Arial"><P>Weighted average shares outstanding</FONT></TD>
<TD WIDTH="13%" VALIGN="TOP">
<U><FONT FACE="Arial"><P ALIGN="RIGHT">743.5</U></FONT></TD>
<TD WIDTH="11%" VALIGN="TOP">
<U><FONT FACE="Arial"><P ALIGN="RIGHT">743.5</U></FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD WIDTH="75%" VALIGN="TOP">
<P> </TD>
<TD WIDTH="13%" VALIGN="TOP">
<P> </TD>
<TD WIDTH="11%" VALIGN="TOP">
<P> </TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD WIDTH="75%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT FACE="Arial"><P>Income (loss) from operations in accordance with U.S. GAAP</FONT></TD>
<TD WIDTH="13%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT FACE="Arial"><P ALIGN="RIGHT">$(10.0)</FONT></TD>
<TD WIDTH="11%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT FACE="Arial"><P ALIGN="RIGHT">$9.8</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD WIDTH="75%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT FACE="Arial"><P>Basic earnings (loss) per share in accordance with U.S. GAAP</FONT></TD>
<TD WIDTH="13%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT FACE="Arial"><P ALIGN="RIGHT">$(0.01)</FONT></TD>
<TD WIDTH="11%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT FACE="Arial"><P ALIGN="RIGHT">$0.01</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD WIDTH="75%" VALIGN="TOP">
<P> </TD>
<TD WIDTH="13%" VALIGN="TOP">
<P> </TD>
<TD WIDTH="11%" VALIGN="TOP">
<P> </TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD WIDTH="75%" VALIGN="TOP">
<B><FONT FACE="Arial"><P>DILUTED</B></FONT></TD>
<TD WIDTH="13%" VALIGN="TOP">
<P> </TD>
<TD WIDTH="11%" VALIGN="TOP">
<P> </TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD VALIGN="TOP" COLSPAN=3>
<FONT FACE="Arial"><P>Diluted earnings per share are not computed as the effect of the conversions of convertible debentures and the exercise of stock options are antidilutive. The convertible debentures are convertible at U.S.$0.35 per common share.</FONT>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

<FONT FACE="Arial"><P> </P></FONT></BODY>
</HTML>
[945 NE2d 1028, 920 NYS2d 777]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tiray M. Paige, Appellant.

Decided March 29, 2011

*817APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Gregory D. LaDuke,*Lake Placid, for appellant.

*Derek P. Champagne, District Attorney,*Malone *(Glenn MacNeill*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Whether an officer had a reasonable belief that the subject of the arrest warrant was in the home so as to demand entry into the residence is a mixed question of law and fact, which, if supported by record evidence, is beyond further review by this Court *(see generally People v Francois,*14 NY3d 732 [2010]). We conclude that record evidence exists to support the determinations of the courts below.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.









|/s/ Leo P. DenaultLeo P. Denault
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Entergy Corporation
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:	March 9, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000823560
<NAME>                 Medical Technology Systems, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
<CURRENCY>                                          US

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Mar-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                              Apr-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                             163
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (287)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,719
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,880
<PP&E>                                           1,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4,973)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,995
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      (8,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,918
<SALES>                                          4,679
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,679
<CGS>                                            2,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    374
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                374
<DISCONTINUED>                                      29
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       403
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06




</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States Institute of Peace

# AGENCY:

United States Institute of Peace.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Agency announces its Annual Grant Competition, which offers support for research, education and training, and the dissemination of information on international peace and conflict resolution. The Annual Grant Competition is open to any project that falls within the Institute's broad mandate of international conflict resolution.

*Deadline:*                         October 1, 2009.                    

                        NEW Online application available:                         *http://www.usip.org/​grants*                        /.                    

# DATES:

Submission of Application: October 1, 2009. Notification Date: March 31, 2010.

# ADDRESSES:

                        United States Institute of Peace, Grant Program, 1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036-3011, (202) 429-3842 (phone), (202) 833-1018 (fax), (202) 457-1719 (TTY), E-mail:                         *grants@usip.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Grant Program—Annual Grant Competition, Phone (202)-429-3842, E-mail:                         *grants@usip.org.*

Dated: June 8, 2009.

 Michael Graham,

Vice President for Management.

[FR Doc. E9-13717 Filed 6-11-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
#### In re: Robert Leo SHEPARD; et al., Debtors, *982Robert Leo Shepard, Appellant, v. Glenn Conklin, Appellee.

No. 10-60016.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 10, 2011.*

Filed Jan. 24, 2011.

Robert Leo Shepard, Oakhurst, CA, pro se.

David Ray Jenkins, David R. Jenkins, PC, Fresno, CA, for Appellee.

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Robert Leo Shepard, a Chapter 7 debt- or, appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment determining that Shepard’s debt to Glenn Conklin was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4) and (a)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo BAP decisions, and apply the same standard of review that the BAP applied to the bankruptcy court’s ruling. *Boyajian v. New Falls Corp. (In re Boyajian),*564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir.2009). We review de novo the bankruptcy court’s grant of summary judgment. *Id.*We affirm.

The bankruptcy court properly granted summary judgment based on issue preclusion because a prior, final state court decision between the parties necessarily decided that Shepard committed “defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity” with respect to Conklin and inflicted “willful and malicious injury” on him. *See*11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(4) and (a)(6); *see also Harmon v. Kobrin (In re Harmon),*250 F.3d 1240, 1245 (9th Cir.2001) (explaining that “[principles of collateral estoppel apply to proceedings seeking exceptions from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a),” and setting forth issue preclusion requirements under California law).

Shepard’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Edward K. TAKAKI, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent.

No. 05-3297.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 11, 2006.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 29, 2006.

Before MAYER, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Edward K. Takaki appeals the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, affirming his removal from his position of machinist by the Navy. *Takaki v. Dep’t of the Navy,*SF0752050330-I-1 (MSPB May 9, 2005). We *affirm.*

This court may only reverse the board’s decision if it was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or unlawful; procedurally deficient; or unsupported by substantial evidence. *See*5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (2000). The board’s findings that Takaki was unable to perform the essential duties of his position, that he failed to prove that he was a “qualified” disabled person, that he failed to show his removal resulted from illegal discrimination based on perceived disability, and that the agency’s action was responsibly considered and did not exceed the maximum reasonable action under the circumstances is supported by substantial evidence. It is irrelevant that Takaki did some recycling work while in the position of Machinist; the relevant finding is that he could no longer perform the official duties of that position, his permanent position of record.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,407,775
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    683,909
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         511,628
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        62,671
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,665,983
<COMMON>                                        78,002
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      880,885
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          (336,940)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 637,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    130,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,474,924
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              10,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  118,750
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,295,046
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,665,983
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,964,679
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            55,379
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,677,374
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        287,305
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (8,438)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 278,867
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       157,959
<NET-INCOME>                                    65,477
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      7,800
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   57,677
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        34,538
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       62,191
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         347,361
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3139 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3139

 To amend title 32, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
 Defense to cover a larger share of expenses under the National Guard 
Youth Challenge Program in the case of a State program during its first 
                       three years of operation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 18, 2010

   Mr. Crapo introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 32, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
 Defense to cover a larger share of expenses under the National Guard 
Youth Challenge Program in the case of a State program during its first 
                       three years of operation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard Youth Challenge 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SHARE OF EXPENSES FOR NEW 
              STATE PROGRAMS UNDER NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CHALLENGE 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) Increased Share Authorized.--Section 509(d) of title 32, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 
        paragraph:
    ``(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), for the first three fiscal 
years during which a State program of the Program is in operation, the 
amount of assistance provided by the Secretary of Defense to the State 
program may not exceed 100 percent of the costs of operating the State 
program.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2010.
                                 <all>
```