alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### KURT M. JACHMANN CO., Inc., Plaintiff, v. MARINE OFFICE OF AMERICA, S. D. McComb & Co., Inc., Owen C. Torrey, Carl P. Kremer, George Inselman, American Insurance Co., American Eagle Fire Insurance Co., Continental Insurance Co. of the City of New York, Fidelity-Phoenix Fire Insurance Co., Firemen’s Insurance Co., Glens Falls Insurance Co., and Hanover Fire Insurance Co., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

Feb. 10, 1955.

*43See, also, 16 F.R.D. 381.

Joseph S. Meadow and M. K. & R. Josephson, New York City, for plaintiff.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, for defendants.

BICKS, District Judge.

Approximately 2% years ago plaintiff served notice to take the testimony of twelve persons by deposition pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The examination of one of said persons was commenced about two years ago and after a single session was adjourned without date. The examinations of the remaining eleven persons were never begun and they all stand adjourned, likewise without date. In July 1954 at plaintiff’s request defendant produced a thirteenth witness; the taking of his deposition was commenced but, again, never completed and adjourned without date. The examinations of still two other witnesses were begun and never completed.

Plaintiff now moves pursuant to Rule 34 for inspection of “All documents in the possession, custody or control of defendant insurance companies, the Marine Office of America, S. D. McComb & Co., Inc., or the. individual defendants, including contracts, minutes of meetings, reports, letters, telegrams, cables, inter- or intra-office memoranda whether originals, copies, drafts or revisions, stenographic transcripts, teletype recordings, diaries, logs, notes, or communications, books of account, records of meetings and telephone conversations, press releases, advertisements * * * ” relating to matters enumerated on a seventeen page schedule annexed to the motion papers.

The motion is resisted upon the grounds that (i) the designation of the documents sought to be examined lacks the particularity required by Rule 34, (ii) many of the documents are not within the scope of a permissible examination and (iii) there has been a failure to demonstrate “good cause" for the inspection.

 There has been such an obvious failure to properly designate the documents sought to be examined that it is unnecessary to consider the other objections articulated by the defendants. If the plaintiff does not have sufficient information to describe with particularity the documents which it desires to inspect, or that such documents exist or that they are under the control of the de*44fendants, it would be well advised to proceed with the depositions already noticed or by written interrogatories under Rule 33 to elicit the appropriate data. See 4 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d Edition, pages 2435-2438.

Motion denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2636 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2636

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain stage lights of aluminum.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Gillibrand) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain stage lights of aluminum.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN STAGE LIGHTS OF ALUMINUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Fresnel lanterns,   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        ellipsoidal                                                        31/2011.......
                        reflector
                        spotlights or
                        floodlights,
                        parabolic
                        aluminized
                        reflector lights,
                        cyclorama, strip
                        lights, scoop
                        lights or
                        followspots, the
                        foregoing of
                        aluminum,
                        suitable for use
                        as theatrical
                        lighting and
                        designed to be
                        affixed to or
                        installed in
                        walls, ceilings,
                        supporting beams
                        or frameworks or
                        theater stages
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        9405.40.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Hybred International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for
the quarter ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary Kouletas,
President of the Company, respectfully certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004,
that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.










/s/ Gary
Kouletas


Gary
Kouletas


President
(Principal Executive Officer)








Date:
January 19, 2010





This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to Hybred International, Inc. and will be
retained by Hybred International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









-17-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          31,629
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          38,546
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    225,469
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          45,024
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            45,582
<LOANS>                                        674,233
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,922
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,040,863
<DEPOSITS>                                     713,738
<SHORT-TERM>                                   106,967
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,541
<LONG-TERM>                                    124,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,002
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,615
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,040,863
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,714
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,570
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    90
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,374
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,522
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,189
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,185
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      501
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,659
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,659
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,036
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.34
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,587
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,175
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,569
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      244
<RECOVERIES>                                        96
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,922
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,922
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,154
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 14 (Friday, January 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1351]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-504-000]


AC Landfill Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

January 14, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
AC Landfill Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure(18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is February 3, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#367073647579585a5f585365434646594442765053445518515940"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="377172657478595b5e595264424747584543775152455419505841">[email protected]</span></a>. or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-1351 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Joseph ZIADEH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RICHBOURG’S SALES AND RENTALS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-6380.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 18, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 31, 2006.

Joseph Ziadeh, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*296PER CURIAM:

Joseph Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint for failure to pay the filing fee and denying relief on his Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the district court’s previous order denying his request to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Ziadeh v. Richbourg’s Sales & Rentals, Inc.,*No. 3:05-cv-00783-RLW (E.D.Va. Feb. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3186 

To reauthorize the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and Reauthorization 

Act of 2004 through April 30, 2010, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2010 

Mr. ROCKEFELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 

considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Satellite Home Viewer Extension and 

Reauthorization Act of 2004 through April 30, 2010, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Satellite Televison Ex5 tension Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SATELLITE TELEVISION EXTENSION. 

7 (a) AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 119 OF TITLE 17, 

8 UNITED STATES CODE.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 119 of title 17, 

10 United States Code, is amended— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3186 CPS

1 (A) in subsection (c)(1)(E), by striking 

2 ‘‘March 28, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘April 30, 

3 2010’’; and 

4 (B) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘March 

5 28, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘April 30 2010’’. 

6 (2) TERMINATION OF LICENSE.—Section 

7 1003(a)(2)(A) of Public Law 111–118 is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘March 28, 2010’’, and inserting ‘‘April 

9 30, 2010’’. 

10 (b) AMENDMENTS TO COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF

11 1934.—Section 325(b) of the Communications Act of 

12 1934 (47 U.S.C. 325(b)) is amended— 

13 (1) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ‘‘March 28, 

14 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘April 30, 2010’’; and 

15 (2) in paragraph (3)(C), by striking ‘‘March 29, 

16 2010’’ each place it appears in clauses (ii) and (iii) 

17 and inserting ‘‘May 1, 2010’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

        Thisagreement, effective as of July 1, 2003 (the “Agreement”) is made by and betweenMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), andMICHAEL P. CONROY, a resident of the State of Florida (the “Executive”).

BACKGROUND

        TheCompany desires to continue to obtain the benefit of services by the Executive, and theExecutive desires to continue to render services to the Company. 

        TheCompensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”)has determined that it is in the Company’s best interest and that of its stockholdersto recognize the substantial contribution that the Executive has made and is expected tomake in the future to the Company’s business and to continue to retain his servicesin the future. 

        Accordingly,in consideration of the mutual covenants and representations contained set forth below,the Company and the Executive agree as follows: 

TERMS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3041 

To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national monuments 

in Nevada except by express authorization of Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2010 

Mr. ENSIGN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the further extension or establishment of national 

monuments in Nevada except by express authorization 

of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FURTHER EXTENSION OR ES4 TABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL MONUMENTS IN 

5 NEVADA. 

6 This proviso of the last sentence of the first section 

7 of the Act of September 14, 1950 (64 Stat. 849, chapter 

8 950; 16 U.S.C. 431a), is amended by inserting ‘‘or Ne9 vada’’ after ‘‘Wyoming’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Farrah Donald, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

Submitted May 2, 2011;

decided May 5, 2011

Motion by Legal Aid Society, Criminal Appeals Bureau and Parole Revocation Defense Unit, for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 19 copies filed within seven days.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                       Exhibit 12(e)

                           Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
          Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and
     Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends



                                                             1996     1997     1998     1999     2000
<S>                                                         <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Fixed charges, as defined:
  Total Interest                                            $16,304  $15,287  $14,792  $14,680  $15,891
  Interest applicable to rentals                                831      911    1,045    1,281    1,008
                                                            -------------------------------------------

Total fixed charges, as defined                              17,135   16,198   15,837   15,961   16,899

Preferred dividends, as defined (a)                           1,549    1,723    1,566    1,566    1,643
                                                            -------------------------------------------

Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined  $18,684  $17,921  $17,403  $17,527  $18,542
                                                            ===========================================

Earnings as defined:

  Net Income                                                $26,776  $15,451  $16,137  $18,961  $16,518
  Add:
    Provision for income taxes:
     Total                                                   16,216   12,142   10,042   13,030   11,597
    Fixed charges as above                                   17,135   16,198   15,837   15,961   16,899
                                                            -------------------------------------------
Total earnings, as defined                                  $60,127  $43,791  $42,016  $47,952  $45,014
                                                            ===========================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined                 3.51     2.70     2.65     3.00     2.66
                                                            ===========================================

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
 preferred dividends, as defined                               3.22     2.44     2.41     2.74     2.43
                                                            ===========================================


------------------------
(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by
    dividing the preferred dividend requirement by one hundred percent (100%)
    minus the income tax rate.

(b) Earnings for the twelve months ended December 31, 1991 include the $90
    million effect of the 1991 NOPSI Settlement.

</TABLE>
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Ronald Hutt, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Guy H. Mitchell, J. at plea; Kate Paek, J. at sentencing), rendered March 13, 2017, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Guy H. Mitchell, J. at plea; Kate Paek, J. at sentencing), rendered March 13, 2017, affirmed.</p><p>The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. Allegations that defendant paid for food in a restaurant with a specified numbered credit card, and that the owner of the credit card stated that defendant "did not have permission or authority to take or possess said credit card number or to use it to make purchases," were sufficient to charge defendant with fourth-degree criminal possession of stolen property (<i>see </i>Penal Law ยง 165.45[2]; <i>People v Peterson</i>, 216 AD2d 10 [1995], <i>lv denied </i>86 NY2d 800 [1995]; <a href="../2009/2009_50138.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Martinez</i>, 22 Misc 3d 131</a>[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 50138[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2009]). Defendant's remaining challenges to the accusatory instrument were forfeited by operation of law as a consequence of his guilty plea. By pleading guilty, defendant not only waived any hearsay defect in the instrument (<i>see People v Keizer</i>, 100 NY2d 114, 122 [2003]), but also any claim that the information was based on information and belief without disclosing the source thereof (<i>see People v Scott</i>, 3 NY2d 148, 152 [1957]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: June 12, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>