alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed October 11, 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00846

- CR

____________ GARY WAYNE FILM , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1361607

ORDER

Our review has determined that relevant item s ha ve been omitted from the clerk’s record filed in this court

. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not
contain : (1) t he indictment or information, any special plea or defense motion that was presented to the court and overruled, any written waiver, any written stipulation, and, in cases in which a plea of guilty or nolo contendere has been entered, any documents executed for the plea;( 2 ) the court's docket sheet;

( 3 ) the court's charge and the jury's verdict, or the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 4 ) the court's judgment or other order that is being appealed;
( 5 ) any request for findings of fact and con clusions of law, any post

judgment motion, and the court's order on the motion;
( 6 ) any formal bill of exception;
( 7 ) any request for a reporter's record, including any statement of points or issues under Rule 34.6(c); (10) any request for preparation of t he clerk's record; and
(1 1 ) any filing that a party designates to have included in the record.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk s record on or before October 21 , 201 3 , containing the items listed above.

If any of th e omitted item s are not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PAUL A. JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement, Dated as of November 1, 2005 

Securitized Asset Backed Receivables, LLC 2005-HE1,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1913

[January 6, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Barry Stone, Judge; L.T. Case No. 18-15025 CACE (11).

Paul A. Jackson, North Lauderdale, pro se.

Brian Pantaleo of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27351-27352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13472]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,865]


Seel Tool and Die, St. Marys, PA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 29, 2009, in response to a 
petition filed on behalf of workers of Seel Tool and Die, St. Marys, 
Pennsylvania.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.


[[Page 27352]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of May 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13472 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           984,333
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      35,795
<MORTGAGE>                                      88,922
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      532
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,597,972
<CASH>                                          10,351
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              11,210
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         240,554
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,055,687
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                315,866
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             45,054
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  65,057
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,097,066
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 63,571
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          103,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,139
<OTHER-SE>                                     249,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,055,687
<PREMIUMS>                                     308,857
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            110,897
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 552
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,325
<BENEFITS>                                     195,033
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     38,929
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           121,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,646
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  54,740
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            128,340
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                 (183)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              99,873
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                21,604
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 61,420
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.(b)
 
 This
Certificate is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be
incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such
filing.
 
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
 Of Title
18 of the United States Code
 
 In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of the Companies (as
defined below) on Form 10-K/A (the “reports”) for the year ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Susan Tomasky, the chief financial officer of
 
 American
Electric Power Company, Inc.
 AEP
Generating Company
 AEP Texas
Central Company
 AEP Texas
North Company
 Appalachian
Power Company
 Columbus
Southern Power Company
 Indiana
Michigan Power Company
 Kentucky
Power Company
 Ohio
Power Company
 Public
Service Company of Oklahoma
 Southwestern
Electric Power Company
 
 (the
"Companies"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i)
the Reports fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Reports fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Companies.
 
 
 
 
 /s/
Susan Tomasky
 Susan
Tomasky
 Chief
Financial Officer
 
 
 May 6,
2005
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 311 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 311

    To prohibit the application of certain restrictive eligibility 
 requirements to foreign nongovernmental organizations with respect to 
the provision of assistance under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act 
                                of 1961.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2009

  Mrs. Boxer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the application of certain restrictive eligibility 
 requirements to foreign nongovernmental organizations with respect to 
the provision of assistance under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act 
                                of 1961.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Global Democracy Promotion Act''.

SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR FOREIGN NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS UNDER PART 
              I OF THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, regulation, or policy, 
in determining eligibility for assistance authorized under part I of 
the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.), foreign 
nongovernmental organizations--
            (1) shall not be ineligible for such assistance solely on 
        the basis of health or medical services, including counseling 
        and referral services, provided by such organizations with non-
        United States Government funds if such services do not violate 
        the laws of the country in which they are being provided and 
        would not violate United States Federal law if provided in the 
        United States; and
            (2) shall not be subject to requirements relating to the 
        use of non-United States Government funds for advocacy and 
        lobbying activities other than those that apply to United 
        States nongovernmental organizations receiving assistance under 
        part I of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2992 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the drawback 

fee on the manufacture or production of certain distilled spirits used 

in nonbeverage products. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2010 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. MENENDEZ) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate 

the drawback fee on the manufacture or production of 

certain distilled spirits used in nonbeverage products. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF DRAWBACK FEE ON MANU4 FACTURE OR PRODUCTION OF CERTAIN DIS5 TILLED SPIRITS USED IN NON-BEVERAGE 

6 PRODUCTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 5114 of 

8 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘of $1 less than’’ and inserting ‘‘equal to’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2992 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to claims filed on or after the 

3 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Ex 10.216

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
​
ThisFOURTHAMENDMENTTOCONTRIBUTIONAGREEMENT(this
“Amendment”) is effective as of the 8th day of June 2022 (the “Amendment Date”) by and among Lodging Fund REIT III OP, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), and RLC V RIFC, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (the “Contributor”).
​
WHEREAS, Contributor and Operating Partnership entered into that certain Contribution Agreement dated February 1, 2022 (the “Agreement”) as amended by the First Amendment on March 24, 2022, as amended by the Second Amendment on April 29, 2022, as amended by the Third Amendment May 10th, 2022 for the contribution of a 113-room hotel business known as the Residence by Marriott Fort Collins located at 1127 Oakridge Drive, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 (the “Property”);
​
WHEREAS, consistent with the terms of the Third Amendment, the Parties have agreed to extend the Closing Date accommodating the satisfaction of the conditions within Section 2.17.1, as described in the Third Amendment;
​
NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
​
1.Capitalization. All capitalized terms used herein will have the meanings ascribed to those terms in the Agreement, unless otherwise specified herein.
​
2.Time and Place. The Operating Partnership and Contributor shall perform each obligation required to convey and close this transaction (including those described in section 2.17.1 as amended by each amendment) by June 21, 2022, notwithstanding the Operating Partnership’s right to extend the Closing Date in 30-day increments which may be done by written notice (email acceptable).
​

3.Conflict; Counterparts. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement, this Amendment shall control. This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts via facsimile or email in .PDF format, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but such counterparts when taken together shall constitute but one Amendment.
​
4.Successors and Assigns. This Amendment shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective successors, administrators, and assigns.
​

​



Ex 10.216

5.Ratification. Except as set forth above, the terms of the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed in their entirety.
​
​
​
​
​
[signature pages to follow]
​

​



Ex 10.216

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first above written.
​
SELLER:
​
RLC V RIFC, LLC
a Colorado limited liability company
​
​
​
By: /s/ Stephen Mills
Stephen Mills, Manager
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​

​



Ex 10.216

​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
[OPERATING PARTNERSHIP’S SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
​

​



Ex 10.216

OPERATING PARTNERSHIP:
​
LODGING FUND REIT III OP, LP
A Delaware limited partnership
​
By: Lodging Fund REIT III, Inc. Its: General Partner
​
​
By: /s/ David R. Durell
Name: David R. Durell
Title: Chief Investment Of

​



Ex 10.223

​

​
September 20, 2021 

Summary proposed implementation of 25 U.S.C. § 2706(b)(3)

National Indian Gaming Commission

Background investigations of vendors, equipment manufacturers & consultants, 

if included in an approved tribal gaming ordinance

Currently, the NIGC processes fingerprints submitted by Tribes for purposes of 

conducting background investigations on primary management officials and key employees.

Under IGRA, 25 U.S.C. § 2706(b)(3), the Commission “shall conduct or cause to be conducted 

such background investigations as may be necessary.” Consultation B seeks Tribes’ views on 

whether NIGC should promulgate regulations for backgrounding— and submitting fingerprints 

for —gaming vendors, suppliers, equipment manufacturers, and consultants with physical or 

logical access to gaming machines, systems, software, supplies, cash and cash equivalents or 

secured/restricted areas of gaming operations as defined by tribal gaming authorities. Such 

background investigations would be mandatory if included in a gaming ordinance approved by 

the NIGC Chair. 

To this end, what are Tribes’ views on who warrants backgrounding? Should the 

determination be made based upon access as described above, job duties, a ten percent or more 

ownership interest in the company, or all of these criteria? And how should these criteria be 

qualified or defined? Should access be limited to routine access? What job duties do Tribes 

believe warrant backgrounding? What other factors, if any, should be considered? Further, must 

licenses be issued to these individuals?

As to Class III gaming, compacts may require some states to conduct significant 

background investigations on prospective vendors. Those states typically maintain a matrix of 

approved vendors. Should the NIGC exempt individuals from state-approved vendors from the 

background investigation process? Or limit the investigation requirements? What do Tribes 

suggest should be included for limited investigation submissions?

Instead of promulgating these regulations, would it be better if the Commission used its 

authority under IGRA, 25 U.S.C. § 27081, to request information from other government 

agencies, such as FBI, IRS, FinCEN, and OFAC, to provide information necessary for NIGC 

investigations of potential bad actors associated with gaming vendors, suppliers, equipment 

manufacturers, and consultants? Potential violations of law then could be referred to appropriate 

law enforcement, including federal, state, and tribal civil and criminal law enforcement 

agencies.2

 1 “The Commission may secure from any department or agency of the United States information necessary to enable 

it to carry out this chapter. Upon the request of the Chairman, the head of such department or agency shall furnish 

such information to the Commission, unless otherwise prohibited by law.” 2 See 25 U.S.C. § 2716(b) (“The Commission shall, when such information indicates a violation of Federal, State, or 

tribal statutes, ordinances, or resolutions, provide such information to the appropriate law enforcement officials.”).
August 31, 2016
By U.S. mail and email

Wilfred Cleveland, President
P.O. Box 667

W9814 Airport Road

Black River Falls, WI 54615

Re: _ Review of financing documents for the Ho-Chunk Nation

Dear President Cleveland:

This letter responds to a June 24, 2016 request from Aaron Harkins on behalf of
the Ho-Chunk Nation for the National Indian Gaming Commission’s Office of General
Counsel to review a financing agreement among the Nation, PNC Bank, and a syndicate
of lenders. Specifically, you have asked for my opinion whether the document is a
management contract requiring the NIGC Chair’s approval under the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act. You also asked for my opinion whether the document violates IGRA’s
requirement that the Tribe have the sole proprietary interest in its gaming activity.

A previous version of this agreement and numerous collateral documents were the
subject of a declination letter issued by this office on March 16, 2015. In my review, for
purposes of this letter, I considered only the Loan Agreement among the Ho-Chunk
Nation, the Lenders, and PNC Bank, NA, Version: NIGC Submitted Draft 6/24/16.

The Loan Agreement submitted by the counsel for the Nation contains terms
similar to other agreements the Office of General Counsel has already reviewed and
analyzed. Copies of declination letters can be found on the NIGC’s website. Applying the
same analysis here, it is my opinion that the Loan Agreement is not a management
contract and does not require the approval of the NIGC Chair. It is also my opinion that it
docs not violate IGRA’s sole proprietary interest requirement.

It is my understanding that the draft is represented to be in substantially final
form, and if the Loan Agreement changes in any material way prior to closing or is
inconsistent with assumptions made herein, this opinion shall not apply. Further, this
opinion is limited to the Loan Agreement. This opinion does not include or extend to any
other agreements not submitted for review.

NEW MAILING ADDRESS: NIGC/DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop #1621 Washington, DC 20240 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fox: 202.632.7066
REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK; Oklahoma City, OK

WWW.NIGC.GOV


I anticipate that this letter will be the subject of Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) requests and will be posted on NIGC’s website. Prior to posting, the NIGC will
notify you and give you an opportunity to identify and request that information subject to
the exemptions under FOIA be redacted or withheld. A list of the FOIA exceptions may
be found at 5 U.S.C. § 552(b).

If you have any questions, please contact NIGC Staff Attorney Jennifer Lawson at
(202) 632-7003.

Sincerely,

Meche Qtfy

Michael Hoenig
General Counsel

ce: Aaron J. Harkins, Faegre Baker Daniels (via email)
Townsend Hyatt, Orrick, Herrington & Suitcliffe, LLP (via email)
Ramon Galvan, Orrick, Herrington & Suitcliffe, LLP (via email)
**Aviation ManagementChecklist #04**

**Aviation ManagementChecklist #04**

For the National Preparedness Review you will need to have the following items available for review.

**4-1Revised 2010**

1-                                   2003

**4-2Revised 2010**
Exhibit 23.1   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-154708 and 333-188451) and Form S-3 (No. 333-183350) of Arabian American Development Company (the “Company”) of our report dated March 18, 2013, except as to Notes 3, 10, 17 through 19, as to which the date is June 21, 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Arabian American Development Company for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, and our report dated March 18, 2013 with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting both which appears in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as amended by the Form 10-K/A-1 filed on June 26, 2013 and by this Form 10-K/A-2.
 
 Our report on the consolidated financial statements of the Company includes an emphasis of matter paragraph regarding the restatement of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 to reflect the effect of adjustments identified in the preparation of the financial statements of an equity method investee in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
 
 Our report on the consolidated financial statements of the Company includes an explanatory paragraph concerning the Company’s change in its method of accounting for its investment in AMAK from the cost method of accounting to the equity method of accounting.
 
 We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in the Registration Statement on Form S-3.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ BKM Sowan Horan, LLP
 Addison, Texas
 August 30, 2013





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-154708 and 333-188451) and Form S-3 (No. 333-183350) of Arabian American Development Company (the “Company”) of our report dated June 10, 2013 with respect to the financial statements of Al Masane Al Kobra Mining Company for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, which appears in the Company’s Form 10-K/A-1  for the year ended December 31, 2012 and amended by this Form 10-K/A-2.











/s/ Mamdouh Al Majed CPAs


Riyadh, Saudi Arabia


August 30, 2013