alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 14, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-2938

Lower Tribunal No. 12-46046

________________

Kingston Mortgage, LLC,

Appellant,

vs.

Ivette Cohen, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Victoria S.

Sigler, Judge.

P.A. Bravo, Paul Alexander Bravo and Ruzy Behnejad, for appellant.

Bart T. Heffernan (Ft. Lauderdale) and Michael T. Gelety (Ft. Lauderdale),

for appellees.

Before SUAREZ, C.J., and EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
We affirm without discussion the trial court’s order vacating its earlier

dismissal order, as the arguments raised by appellant are without merit. Further,

and upon this court’s own motion, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure

9.410(a), appellant’s counsel, Paul Alexander Bravo, and P.A. Bravo, P.A., is

hereby ordered to show cause, within ten days, why sanctions should not be

imposed upon Paul Alexander Bravo, and P.A. Bravo, P.A., for the filing of a

proceeding and briefs which are frivolous or in bad faith. Such sanctions may

include reprimand, contempt, attorney’s fees, costs, or other sanctions. 

2
Exhibit 31(l)

CERTIFICATIONS

** 
I, Theodore H. Bunting, Jr., certify that:  
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of System Energy Resources, Inc.;  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:   
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   
b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;   
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

		/s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.		

**
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13560]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review; Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its 
intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The 
purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The 
agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation 
may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The 
majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being 
reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, 
including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the 
agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act.
    These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an 
individual basis in the Federal Register. NSF intends to publish a 
notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of 
the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the 
proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on 
changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site: 
http://www.nsf.gov/events/advisory.jsp. This information may also be 
requested by telephoning 703/292-8180.

    Dated: June 5, 2009.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-13560 Filed 6-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 23.1




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
33-51085,  33-57822,  33-61228, 33-55473, 33-64455 and 333-15379 on Form S-3, of
our report dated  February 28, 1997 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Arizona Public Service Company for the year ended December 31, 1996.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

March 27, 1997
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II-OW for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F.
Wells, III, Principal Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Principal Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Leo F. Wells, III      
|Leo F. Wells, III          
|Principal Executive Officer
|November 8, 2007           



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Douglas P. Williams    
|Douglas P. Williams        
|Principal Financial Officer
|November 8, 2007
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                      ASSOCIATES FIRST CAPITAL CORPORATION
 
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
                                                 ----------------------------------------------------
                                                   1997       1996       1995       1994       1993
                                                 --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                              <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Fixed Charges (a)
  Interest expense.............................  $2,775.2   $2,456.0   $2,177.9   $1,657.3   $1,421.7
  Implicit interest in rent....................      20.3       17.1       13.8       11.7       10.8
                                                 --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
          Total fixed charges..................  $2,795.5   $2,473.1   $2,191.7   $1,669.0   $1,432.5
                                                 ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Earnings (b)...................................  $1,640.0   $1,404.6   $1,198.1   $1,017.4   $  821.3
Fixed charges..................................   2,795.5    2,473.1    2,191.7    1,669.0    1,432.5
                                                 --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
  Earnings, as defined.........................  $4,435.5   $3,877.7   $3,389.8   $2,686.4   $2,253.8
                                                 ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.............      1.59       1.57       1.55       1.61       1.57
                                                 ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
</TABLE>
 
---------------
 
    (a) For purposes of such computation, the term "fixed charges" represents
        interest expense and a portion of rentals representative of an implicit
        interest factor for such rentals.
 
    (b) For purposes of such computation, the term "earnings" represents
        earnings before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of
        changes in accounting principles, plus fixed charges.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet and related Statement of Income of Auto-Graphics, Inc. as of December 31,
1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          364094
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1920304
<ALLOWANCES>                                     38000
<INVENTORY>                                     123082
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2557921
<PP&E>                                         9589699
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5164177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7131950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1747770
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        110928
<OTHER-SE>                                     2507431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7131950
<SALES>                                        9217937
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9251917
<CGS>                                          5500527
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8571753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              253258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 426906
<INCOME-TAX>                                    190000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             236906
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    236906
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3244 

AN ACT 

To provide that Members of Congress shall not receive a 

cost of living adjustment in pay during fiscal year 2011. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3244 ES

1 SECTION 1. NO COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT IN PAY OF 

2 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no ad4 justment shall be made under section 601(a) of the Legis5 lative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31) (relating 

6 to cost of living adjustments for Members of Congress) 

7 during fiscal year 2011. 

Passed the Senate April 22, 2010. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3244 

AN ACT 

To provide that Members of Congress shall not refiscal year 2011. ceive a cost of living adjustment in pay during
Exhibit 12(b)Entergy Gulf States, Inc.Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges andRatios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends2001
2002
2003
2004
2005Fixed charges, as defined:Total Interest charges
$174,368
$144,840
$157,343
$133,598
$126,788Interest applicable to rentals
18,520
16,483
16,694
13,707
8,832Total fixed charges, as defined
192,888
161,323
174,037
147,305
135,620Preferred dividends, as defined (a)
13,017
6,190
6,485
6,991
6,444Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined
$205,905
$167,513
$180,522
$154,296
$142,064Earnings as defined:Income (loss) from continuing operations before extraordinary items andthe cumulative effect of accounting changes
$179,444
$174,078
$63,895
$192,264
$206,497Add:Income Taxes
82,038
65,997
24,249
108,288
110,270Fixed charges as above
192,888
161,323
174,037
147,305
135,620Total earnings, as defined (b)
$454,370
$401,398
$262,181
$447,857
$452,387Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined
2.36
2.49
1.51
3.04
3.34Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges andpreferred dividends, as defined
2.21
2.40
1.45
2.90
3.18(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by dividing the preferred dividend
      requirement by one hundred percent (100%) minus the income tax rate.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ADRIAN RAYMOND WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant,

v. No. 97-6673 THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-97-1237-S) Submitted: July 21, 1998 Decided: August 11, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Adrian White, Appellant Pro Se.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). Appellant's conviction b ecame final in March 1995. On April 22, 1997, Appellant filed his § 2254 petition. The district court deniedrelief because Appellant filed his petition outside the one-year limitation period imposed by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(d) (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). Pursuant to our r ecent decision in Brown v. Angelone , ___ F.3d ___, Nos. 96-7173, 96-7208, 1998 WL 389030 (4th Cir. July 14, 1998), Appellant had until April 23, 1997, in which to file a timely petition. Accordingly, because Appellant filed his§ 2254 petition before April 23, 1997, we grant a certificate of appealability, v acate the district court's order, and remand this case for consideration on the merits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3309 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3309

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the rate of tax 
                for the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 2010

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the rate of tax 
                for the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund 
Improvement Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. RATE OF TAX FOR OIL SPILL LIABILITY TRUST FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 4611 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to the imposition of tax) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (B) 
                and inserting the following:
                    ``(B) except as provided in paragraph (3), the Oil 
                Spill Liability Trust Fund financing rate is 9 cents a 
                barrel.''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following new 
                paragraph:
            ``(3) Temporary suspension of oil spill liability trust 
        fund financing rate.--In the case of any calendar quarter in 
        which the Secretary estimates that, as of the close of the 
        previous quarter, the unobligated balance in the Oil Spill 
        Liability Trust Fund is greater than $10,000,000,000, the Oil 
        Spill Liability Trust Fund financing rate is 0 cents a 
        barrel.''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (f).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply on and after the first day of the first calendar quarter after 
the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2796 

To extend the authority of the Secretary of Education to purchase guaranteed 

student loans for an additional year, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2009 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. 

BURR, Mr. COBURN, Mr. GREGG, Mr. HATCH, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. 

MCCAIN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To extend the authority of the Secretary of Education to 

purchase guaranteed student loans for an additional 

year, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF STUDENT LOAN PURCHASE AU4 THORITY. 

5 Section 459A of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

6 (20 U.S.C. 1087i–1) is amended— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2796 IS

1 (1) in subsections (a)(1), (a)(3)(A), and (f), by 

2 striking ‘‘July 1, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘July 1, 

3 2011’’; and 

4 (2) in subsection (e)— 

5 (A) in the matter preceding clause (i) of 

6 paragraph (1)(A) and the matter preceding 

7 subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2), by striking 

8 ‘‘September 30, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep9 tember 30, 2011’’; 

10 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘Feb11 ruary 15, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘February 15, 

12 2012’’; and 

13 (C) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘2010, 

14 and 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2010, 2011, and 

15 2012’’. 

16 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE LEND17 ERS FOR LENDER-OF-LAST-RESORT PRO18 GRAM. 

19 Section 428(j) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

20 (20 U.S.C. 1078(j)) is amended— 

21 (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘June 30, 

22 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2011’’; 

23 (2) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘June 30, 

24 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2011’’; and 

25 (3) in paragraph (9)(A)— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2796 IS

1 (A) in the matter preceding subclause (I) 

2 of clause (ii), by striking ‘‘June 30, 2011’’ and 

3 inserting ‘‘June 30, 2012’’; 

4 (B) in subclause (III) of clause (ii), by 

5 striking ‘‘June 30, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘June 

6 30, 2011’’; and 

7 (C) in the matter preceding subclause (I) 

8 of clause (iii), by striking ‘‘July 1, 2011’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘July 1, 2012’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00475

- CV

ESTATE OF MARY LAVER NE BOORTZ, DECEASED

----------

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF HOOD COUNTY

----------


### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

----------
Appellant Mary Denise Langwell att empts to appeal the trial court’ s July

25, 2011 order removing her as independent executr ix of the Estate of Mary

Laverne Boortz

. Appellant timely filed a request for findings of fact and

conclusions of law, extending the deadline for filing t he notice of appeal until

October 24, 2011

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 (a)(4) ; Tex. R. Civ. P. 306c

. But

appellant did not file a notice of appeal until November 14, 2011 , and there is no

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

evidence that s he mailed h er notice of appeal during the time for fil ing a motion

to extend. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b), 26.3.

On November 1 7, 2011, we sent appellant a letter expressing our concern

that we lack jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was untimely filed. See

Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 26.1; Crites v. Collins, 284 S .W.3d 839, 840 (Tex. 2009)

(indicating that the timely filing of a notice of appeal under rule 26.1 is

jurisdictional). We informed appellant that unless s he or any party desiring to

continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for c ontinuing the appeal,

this appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Appellant filed a

response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal.

Because appellant’ s notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss the appeal

for want of jurisdi ction

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 22, 2011