alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund II-OW for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned,
Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LEO F. WELLS, III  
| |  | Leo F. Wells, III      
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | May 9, 2008            



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS
| |  | Douglas P. Williams    
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | May 9, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,629
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                   8,288
<INVENTORY>                                    29,149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               64,642
<PP&E>                                         28,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          27,765
<BONDS>                                        9,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       71
<OTHER-SE>                                     41,252
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,576
<SALES>                                        77,229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               77,229
<CGS>                                          62,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  62,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12,998
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                215
<INCOME-TAX>                                   60
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            155
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   155
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 21, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 3961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1364]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 21, 2009 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 3961]]

                Notice of January 15, 2009

                
Continuation of the National Emergency with 
                Respect to Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the 
                Middle East Peace Process

                On January 23, 1995, by Executive Order 12947, the 
                President declared a national emergency pursuant to the 
                International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
                1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 
                threat to the national security, foreign policy, and 
                economy of the United States constituted by grave acts 
                of violence committed by foreign terrorists who 
                threaten to disrupt the Middle East peace process. On 
                August 20, 1998, by Executive Order 13099, the 
                President modified the Annex to Executive Order 12947 
                to identify four additional persons, including Usama 
                bin Laden, who threaten to disrupt the Middle East 
                peace process.

                Because these terrorist activities continue to threaten 
                the Middle East peace process and to pose an unusual 
                and extraordinary threat to the national security, 
                foreign policy, and economy of the United States, the 
                national emergency declared on January 23, 1995, as 
                expanded on August 20, 1998, and the measures adopted 
                on those dates to deal with that emergency must 
                continue in effect beyond January 23, 2009. Therefore, 
                in accordance with section 202(d) of the National 
                Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing 
                for 1 year the national emergency with respect to 
                foreign terrorists who threaten to disrupt the Middle 
                East peace process.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    January 15, 2009.

[FR Doc. E9-1364
Filed 1-16-09; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3195-W9-P
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

-C.yucW 

*r(arrr.mtRu 

Dear h’. 

01 bar, refueett *,o 

a6on tiubt no pareimozS*e Beased Ultil Btatutea 

ate for the p3nmhase OS mater- 

, eqLLtpmont adl mlstenanoe sor 

BS&+,. exoept as ,MwoSnaSter pz' 

tw aball Be upon~t~tW& 

ale aaitnnlt .to Be expded is,rfir axoBB0 or the 

sumof +6,0OO,OotEepurcWee aballbeasde 

upon eealwl oonpetitlve biao rectelted by the 

Ilxulqger aster ten days eaY8rtLeement Till some 

paper or papere of g.3nw~,M.rcmlotioPinthie 

Btate . TEere~ the tummnt. of tEe paroEw4e it3 

lese than $6,000,0o~.tEa mxeger &all, before 

lettimg any oontrept fob swh parohDee, ask 
the 

for the msteriaJ5 sndinstallation sf asamiing plsntat 

the BtateJarmindi8strle5. The 6y5t0m,~ no tlouBt, aoted 

%$ guru-oe of Aytisls 6lW1, abwe quoted, and the Board 

r 

rhaps dsolinsd to approve the sontraat Beoause of Ar 1015 680 of the statutes. 

The langmge~ot A.IWole 0188m, *all toMroot* for 

the purchase of ad4rlal5, sup &es, eqaipmmt 55d sustename for the4 Prison SystenQ p' eBraod enootgb to %~5&uae 

the present; oontraot. mhel~ngaage ofdrtidee~4, %3.m 

supplies to inoluda * * e ard all othsr.tEings re@md By 

the iliffe~rent department5 or bmtitutions, sxsspt sb*iotly 

pwishable goods,* is also broad snsugb to ower the present 

eontraot. 

fhwe Is, therefore, an olmious ooafliot, and 0110 

OF t,hs other OS the statutes must fall. The rule in sued a 

0888 IS that ths'last Ast 'rep3515 or supereecles the prior 

Aot in respect to t&e OOafliOt. 
. 

Eonorable 460 ,, a. shfwgard - Ewe. 3 

1. 

i 

Article 6lflSn was enacted in IQzr. &tic18 634 

was smenlefl %q 1989 by H. B. 149 (ati C. 8. 41st Leg..p. 

aoj C@;l+ ,‘Lbere is no 5xprees repealSng clause in 

H. Bi Ho. $4*. mere is alwsgs an inrpl+ation of repeal, 

Jwweyer, where,,. as here, the prtieions of'the lzm statutes 

relste".to~the asme subjeot-m&t&r, and sre,l;n such conflict 

85 that both oalmot stsud at the ssme time. Furthermore, 

the. emergemy olauee of H. B. No. 149 la '$uite. eignifioant. 

~Thtat~clause ier 

*The neoeseity for 0onformIng and extending the e1x5roiee of the rosponsibil+ties to 

be aee@ed by the Board Of Control to all institutions of the St&e gorermo3nt, creates 

ane+frgemoy and an ikperatire ,plbliO.netes~ 

sk*y that ,the oonstitutional rule~requjr%ng 

that.biil&be reed on three meteral dsye be 

~usp51#%3d, an&the rule $5 hereby suep5n&&, 

andth%e A& shall t5ke SffeOt 8ndb5~i3l 

80:.&t, you are adylsed that the. oonf+raot in 

question should have been let by th0 @o&d-of Contro2 

rather than by the FrzLson System, Artiole 634 being the 

llaast Aot, ,and you should not pass the aooouut for psy- 

. 

Very bLly y0urs 

ATTORNEX 

O&aR Assistant
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 21

- 00366

- CV

Vonda L. COLLIER

, Appellant

v.

Hayward COLLIER

, Appellee

From the County Court a t Law No. 10

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020CV04756 Honorable J

. Frank Davis , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 9, 2022

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

On February 1, 2022, we ordered appellant to file her brief and to show cause in writing

by February 16, 2022, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

.

R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a); see also id. R. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant fails to

comply with court order). Appellant did not respond to this court’s order, and, to date, ap pellant

has not filed a brief. Because appellant failed to timely file a brief in this appeal, this appeal is

dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 10.10

AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT

Re: License Agreement, dated as of 03/01/2008, by and between ImmunoCellular and Regent Business Centers Woodland Hills, LLC as Licensor.

The above referenced Agreement is hereby amended subject to the following modifications or revisions:



|1. | The term set forth in the Agreement is hereby extended. The renewal term will commence on 7/1/2010 and will expire 6/30/2011. Subject to any modification
and or revisions, which both Regent and Client agree to.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Effective 7/1/10 for a three month duration client shall receive temporary rent relief on offices #45, 46 and 47. During term Fixed Office Fee shall be reduced
to $2,320.00.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Effective 10/1/10 for the duration of the term the Fixed Office Fee shall return to $2,894.30.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the same meaning as set forth in and defined in the License Agreement.

Except as set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the License Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



|                  |  |         
|----------------- |  | --------
|Agreed to:
Dated: |  | 5/7/2010

|                                            |  |                    
|------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|                                           
|Client:                                    
|                                            | 
|By:                                         |  | /s/ Manish Singh   
|                                            | 
|Name:                                       |  | Manish Singh, Ph.D.
|                                           
|Regent Business Centers Woodland Hills, LLC
|                                            | 
|By:                                         |  | /s/ Flor Garcia    
|                                            | 
|Name:                                       |  | Flor Garcia
#### Aura Quinones, Appellant, v Neighborhood Youth and Family Services, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Submitted September 13, 2010;

decided November 30, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Claire Marie HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41545

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 22, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

John Edward Cromwell, Cromwell & McCoy, Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Claire Marie Harris appeals the sentence imposed following her plea of guilty to possession of a counterfeit obligation of the United States with intent to defraud. The district court departed from the Sentencing Guidelines to sentence Harris to 24 months of imprisonment, twice the 12-month maximum under the Guidelines, on the ground that Harris’s criminal history score underrepresented the likelihood of repeated criminal wrongdoing.

We review “both the decision to depart and the extent of that departure for abuse of discretion.” *United States v. Desselle,*450 F.3d 179, 182 (5th Cir.2006). The district court did not abuse its discretion by departing on grounds that Harris has repeatedly committed the same type of crime, Harris was on supervised release for that same crime, and prior sentences have failed to deter Harris’s criminal conduct. *See United States v. De Luna-Trujillo,*868 F.2d 122, 125 (5th Cir.1989); *United States v. Lee,*358 F.3d 315, 328 (5th Cir.2004). Moreover, the 12-month departure was not an abuse of discretion; we have affirmed greater departures on similar grounds. *See United States v. Smith,*417 F.3d 483, 491-92 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 713, 163 L.Ed.2d 543 (2005).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### In the Matter of Felipe Concepcion, Appellant, v Robert T. Johnson, Respondent.

Decided April 28, 2011

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of. the Constitution.
<PAGE>   1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Associates Corporation of North America on Form S-3 (File No. 33-63577) of
our report dated January 20, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Associates Corporation of North America and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and
1995, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                            COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
Dallas, Texas
February 17, 1998
#### Stanley Reid HENRICKSEN, petitioner, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE.

No. 06-7516.

Jan. 8, 2007.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
#### Randy L. VALENTINE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Cecilia REYNOLDS, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 08-8522.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 2009.

Decided: May 27, 2009.

Randy L. Valentine, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*240PER CURIAM:

Randy L. Valentine seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Valentine has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              75
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2721
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        261
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3102
<PP&E>                                            7326
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4641)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3071
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         13976
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10492)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6556
<SALES>                                           1603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1603
<CGS>                                             1519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1487)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1487)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1487)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)


</TABLE>
97-374.

#### State ex rel. Timson v. Petro.

In Mandamus, Prohibition and Procedendo. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus, prohibition, and procedendo. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal of the first, second, third, fifth, sixth, and seventh causes of action,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal of the first, second, third, fifth, sixth, and seventh causes of action be, and hereby is, granted.

The fourth cause of action remains pending.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**Consent of Ernst& Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (nos. 333-109905 and 333-113167) of Anacomp, Inc. of ourreport dated November 18, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Anacomp, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended September 30, 2004.

 

 
|                   | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                   |                      |
|                   |                      |
| December 14, 2004 |                      |

 

----
#### Lexjac, LLC, et al., Respondents, v Julianne W. Beckerman et al., Appellants.

Submitted June 1, 2010;

decided August 31, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine an action or proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and is not an order of the type provided for in CPLR 5602 (a) (2).
<PAGE> 1
                                                                Exhibit 10.35


                            FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                             ANGELICA CORPORATION
                    1994 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS STOCK PLAN


      The Angelica Corporation 1994 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan is
hereby amended, effective as of January 27, 1998, in the following
particulars:

1.    Article 1.4(aa) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

      RETAINER DATE means the date on which a Retainer payment is payable
to a Non-Employee Director, which shall be November 29, 1994 for the Retainer
payment for the initial Plan Year and the date of the Annual Meeting for
subsequent Plan Years, provided, however, that if a Non-Employee Director is
first elected to the Board on a date other than the date of the Annual
Meeting, the Retainer Date for the then current Plan Year shall be the date
he or she commences to serve as a new Non-Employee Director.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed by
its duly authorized officer this 27th day of January, 1998.

                                    ANGELICA CORPORATION


                                    By:  /s/ Don W. Hubble
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Chairman of the Board,
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer