alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 10, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Nokia, Copenhagen, Denmark has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 29, 2001, Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 30, 2001 (66 FR 39336).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 22, 2009. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on August 3, 2009 (74 FR 38473).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. E9-25303 Filed 10-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             598
<SECURITIES>                                 1,388,923
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,399,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,723
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,390,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,399,377
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,647
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,647
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,647
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2988 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2988

     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the 
 exceptions process for two years with respect to caps on payments for 
              therapy services under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 4, 2010

  Mr. Ensign introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the 
 exceptions process for two years with respect to caps on payments for 
              therapy services under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securing Effective and Necessary 
Individual Outpatient Rehabilitation Services (SENIORS) Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCEPTIONS PROCESS FOR MEDICARE THERAPY CAPS.

    (a) Extension.--Section 1833(g)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395l(g)(5)) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2009'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2011''.
    (b) Revision to the Medicare Improvement Fund.--Section 
1898(b)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395iii(b)(1)(A)), 
as amended by section 1011(b) of the Department of Defense 
Appropriations Act, 2010 (Public Law 111-118), is amended by striking 
``$20,740,000,000'' and inserting ``$19,740,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

KT Corporation:

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-100251)on Form F-3 of KT Corporation of our report dated May 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of KT Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings and retained earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which report, which is partially based on the
report of other auditors, appears in the December 31, 2005, annual report on Form 20-F of KT Corporation.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|KPMG Samjong Accounting Corp.
|Seoul, Korea                 
|June 26, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. 50-277 and 50-278]

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects a notice appearing in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 29, 2009 (74 FR 5191), that notified the public of the Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for issuance of an Exemption from Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Appendix R, Section III.G, “Fire Protection of Safe Shutdown Capability,” for the use of operator manual actions in lieu of the requirements specified in Section III.G.2 as requested by Exelon Generation Company, LLC for operation of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 located in York and Lancaster Counties, Pennsylvania. This action is necessary to correct the Licensee's name as stated in the subject heading of the original notice.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        John D. Hughey, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone (301) 415-3204, e-mail:                         *John.Hughey@nrc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On page 5191, in the first column, 11th  line, the subject heading is corrected to read from “Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.;” to “Exelon Generation Company, LLC, and PSEG Nuclear, LLC;.”

Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of January 2009.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

John D. Hughey, 

Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch I-2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. E9-2546 Filed 2-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHS
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A-2 for the
quarterly period ended May 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John Schmitz, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ JOHN SCHMITZ                                        
| |                                                         
| | John Schmitz                                            
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer

March 2, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements at March 31, 1999 (unaudited) and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               2
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (79)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,440
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,400
<PP&E>                                           1,148
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (441)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,604
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,246
<SALES>                                         14,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,373
<CGS>                                           11,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (208)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        28
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (236)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (236)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose AGUIRRE-ARIZAGA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-5116.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 2, 2006.

James Edward Quander, Jr., Quander & Rubain, P.A., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jose Aguirre-Arizaga pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute 487 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (2000). The district court sentenced Aguirre-Arizaga to ninety months of imprisonment. Aguirre-Arizaga’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that, in his view, there are no meritorious issues on which to appeal Aguirre-Arizaga’s sentence. Aguirre-Arizaga was informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so. We affirm.

In sentencing Aguirre-Arizaga, the district court considered the properly calculated advisory sentencing guidelines range and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp.2006). The sentence imposed is within the guideline range and well below the forty-year statutory maximum set forth in 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(B) (West 1999 & Supp.2006). Under these circumstances, we find that Aguirre-Arizaga’s sentence is reasonable. *See United States v. Johnson,*445 F.3d 339, 345 (4th Cir.2006); *United States v. Green,*436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir.) (stating that “a sentence imposed within the properly calculated Guidelines range ... is presumptively reasonable”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2309, 164 L.Ed.2d 828 (2006).

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record for any meritorious issues and have found none. Accordingly, we affirm Aguirre-Arizaga’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *191the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          7
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                    
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                  91,310
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                    91,310
<EQUITIES>                             37,762
<MORTGAGE>                              6,812
<REAL-ESTATE>                              46
<TOTAL-INVEST>                        142,485
<CASH>                                 45,499
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                     26,854
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                 15,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        252,994
<POLICY-LOSSES>                       120,459
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                    25,100
<POLICY-OTHER>                          3,639
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                        35,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                               164
<COMMON>                               18,712
<OTHER-SE>                             40,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          252,994
<PREMIUMS>                             86,025
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                    11,457
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                      1,589
<OTHER-INCOME>                              0
<BENEFITS>                             54,281
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>            26,959
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         7,815
<INCOME-TAX>                             (204)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     7,611
<DISCONTINUED>                         (4,447)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            3,164
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                         79,514
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                    57,481
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                      (4,802)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                     28,279
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                       24,227
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                        84,074
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                     0
                                    

</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-19-00120-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE JOHN CHRISTNER TRUCKING, LLC 

AND STEPHEN SPRAGUE

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Hinojosa

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa1

Relators John Christner Trucking, LLC and Stephen Sprague have filed an 

unopposed motion to dismiss this original proceeding. According to the motion, relators 

and the real parties in interest, Michael Ladd, Christopher Ladd, and Stephen Bryson, as 

next friend of his minor son E.B., have reached a settlement agreement that will resolve 

 1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); see 

also id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). 
2

their claims in the underlying lawsuit and the issues raised in relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus are now moot.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and the unopposed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that this matter has been rendered 

moot. See City of Krum, Tex. v. Rice, 543 S.W.3d 747, 749 (Tex. 2017) (per curiam) 

(stating that a case is moot when either no live controversy exists between the parties or 

the parties have no legally cognizable interest in the outcome); Heckman v. Williamson 

Cty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012) (“Put simply, a case is moot when the court’s 

action on the merits cannot affect the parties’ rights or interests.”); In re Kellogg Brown & 

Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (“A case becomes moot 

if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings, 

including the appeal.”). Accordingly, we lift the stay previously imposed in this case. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief 

is effective until the case is finally decided.”). We grant the unopposed motion to dismiss 

and we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. 

LETICIA HINOJOSA

Justice 

Delivered and filed the

24th day of May, 2019.