alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Henrietta HART, for Use and Benefit of Joseph DANZANSKY et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gertrude W. FINLEY et al., Defendants.

Civ. A. No. 2236-55.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

Aug. 13, 1955.

*310Mark P. Friedlander, Edward A. Aaronson, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

King & Nordlinger, Milton W. King, Bernard I. Nordlinger, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

WILKIN, District Judge.

The complaint alleges breach of contract and misrepresentations. The defendant trustees were made parties because they hold the legal title to the property. The trustees are not charged with misrepresentation or breach of contract, and there is no allegation of threatened foreclosure of the deed of trust. There is, therefore, no basis for any relief against the trustees.

But because legal title to the property is in the trustees and because this action involves the contract which led to the transfer of the property, it seems to this Court that the trustees are proper parties. If the trustees had not been made parties and they had filed a motion to intervene, the Court certainly would have sustained such a motion. If further pleadings and proceedings warrant such action, the trustees may renew their motion to be dismissed. For the time being, however, the motion of defendant trustees to dismiss the complaint as to them is overruled.
ACCEPTED 12-14-00337-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 7/22/2015 4:23:38 PM CATHY LUSK CLERK
October 18,2005 

Via facsimile 864-220-6167 

and First Class mail 

Mr. David Waters 

VP Engineering 

Nova Gaming 

920 Frontage Rd. 

Greenville SC 2961 1 

Re: Classification, Nova Gaming Bingo system version 4.2.7.50 

3q,ll,a ' Dear Mr. Waters: 

This is in response to your 1e:tter of September 22, 2005, requesting classification of 

Nova Gaming's Bingo system, version 4.2.7.50. 

This office issued an opinion1 letter on April 4,2005, concluding that the Nova Bingo 

system version 4.2.0.12 was Class 11. Subsequently, in the ordinary course of business, 

Nova added features and fixed bugs. On August 25,2005, this office concluded that 

Bingo system version 4.2.5.9 was also Class I1 because the changes incorporated into that 

version left the bingo game's features and method of play unchanged. 

Time has passed again, and lUova is now seeking to place version 4.2.7.50 in Tribal 

casinos. We have reviewed a list from Nova of all of the new features and bug fixes 

incorporated into version 4.2.7.50 that were not in version 4.2.5.9. We have also reviewed 

a report from BMM test labs, which concludes that none of those modifications alters in 

any way the game features and play described in our April 4 letter. 

Accordingly, the opinion expressed in our April 4 letter that Nova Bingo system is Class 

I1 applies as well ro the Bing,o gaming central server file, BGC.EXE, version 4.2.7.50, 

which has an SHA-1 signature of 3b8d57845bca9456ccO4cSd 1965fd78487faabab. 

NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1441 L St. NW, Suite 9100. Washington. DC 2OOOS Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 WWW.NIGC.GOV 

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland. OR; Sacramento. CA; Phoenix. AZ; St. Paul. MN; Tulsa. OK 
David Waters 

P. 2 

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Michael Gross, Senior Attorney, 

at 202-632-7003. 

Sincerely, 

J 

Penny J. Coleman 

Acting General Counsel 

cc: Geoffrey Standing Bear, Esq.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6872

JAMES BILLY HENRY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAN MAHN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-99-175-7)

Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 3, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Billy Henry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Billy Henry seeks to appeal the district court's order

dismissing without prejudice his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999), for failure to exhaust state court

remedies. Because Henry failed to challenge the basis for the

district court's ruling in his informal brief, he has not preserved

the issue for our review. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Henry v. Mahn, No. CA-99-175-

7 (W.D. Va. June 11, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 12(c)Entergy Louisiana, Inc.Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges andRatios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends2000
2001
2002
2003
2004Fixed charges, as defined:Total Interest
$111,743
$116,076
$100,667
$76,756
$74,141Interest applicable to rentals
6,458
7,951
6,496
6,359
5,595Total fixed charges, as defined
118,201
124,027
$107,163
$83,115
$79,736Preferred dividends, as defined (a)
16,102
12,374
10,647
$11,189
$10,899Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined
$134,303
$136,401
$117,810
$94,304
$90,635Earnings as defined:Net Income
$162,679
$132,550
$144,709
$146,154
$127,495Add:Provision for income taxes:Total Taxes
112,645
86,287
84,765
97,408
79,475Fixed charges as above
118,201
124,027
107,163
83,115
79,736Total earnings, as defined
$393,525
$342,864
$336,637
$326,677
$286,706Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined
3.33
2.76
3.14
3.93
3.60Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges andpreferred dividends, as defined
2.93
2.51
2.86
3.46
3.16------------------------(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed
     by dividing the preferred dividendrequirement by one hundred percent
     (100%) minus the income tax rate.
VI 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3351 

For the relief of Marco Antonio Sanchez. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2010 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Marco Antonio Sanchez. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MARCO 

4 ANTONIO SANCHEZ. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Marco Antonio Sanchez shall be eli8 gible for an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) 

12 or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3351 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Marco Antonio 

2 Sanchez enters the United States before the filing deadline 

3 set forth in subsection (c), Marco Antonio Sanchez shall 

4 be considered to have entered and remained lawfully in 

5 the United States and shall be eligible for adjustment to 

6 lawful permanent resident status under section 245 of the 

7 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

9 (c) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub10 sections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for 

11 issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for ad12 justment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later 

13 than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or lawful perma16 nent resident status to Marco Antonio Sanchez, the Sec17 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce 

18 by one, during the current or next following fiscal year, 

19 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail20 able to natives of the country of birth of Marco Antonio 

21 Sanchez under section 202(a)(2) of the Immigration and 

22 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)). 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
CONSENT
OF MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.


INDEPENDENT
PETROLEUM ENGINEERS





As independent petroleum engineers,
Miller and Lents, Ltd. hereby consents to the use of references in the Form
10-K/A of EnerJex Resources, Inc. of our estimates of reserves as of March 31,
2010 and to all references to our firm included in this Form
10-K/A.





The Form 10-K/A contains references to
a certain report prepared by Miller and Lents, Ltd. for the exclusive use of
EnerJex Resources, Inc.  The analysis, conclusions, and methods
contained in the report are based upon information that was in existence at the
time the report was rendered and Miller and Lents, Ltd. has not updated and
undertakes no duty to update anything contained in the report.  While
the report may be used as a descriptive resource, investors are advised that
Miller and Lents, Ltd. has not verified information provided by others except as
specifically noted in the report, and Miller and Lents, Ltd. makes no
representation or warranty as to the accuracy of such
information.  Moreover, the conclusions contained in such report are
based on assumptions that Miller and Lents, Ltd. believed were reasonable at the
time of its preparation and that are described in such report in reasonable
detail.  However, there are a wide range of uncertainties and risks
that are outside of the control of Miller and Lents, Ltd. which may impact these
assumptions, including but not limited to unforeseen market changes, actions of
governments or individuals, natural events, economic changes, and changes of
laws and regulations or interpretation of laws and regulations.





MILLER
      AND LENTS, LTD.
                Texas
      Registered Engineering Firm No. F-1442By
              /s/Leslie A. FallonLeslie
      A. Fallon
                Vice
      President





Houston,
Texas


November
12, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 111 (Thursday, June 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13700]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Designation of Fishery Management Council Members and 
Application for Reinstatement of State Authority.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-0314.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 4,607.
    Number of Respondents: 146.
    Average Hours per Response: 58 hours average for a nomination 
package for one to three candidates; 16 hours for a nominee to provide 
background documentation, and 1 hour for application of State authority 
over a fishery.
    Needs and Uses: The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, as amended in 1996, provides for members of Fishery 
Management Councils by State governors and Indian treaty tribes, for 
the designation of a principal state fishery official for the purposes 
of the Act, and for a request by a state for reinstatement of state 
authority over a managed fishery. The information submitted with these 
actions will be used to ensure that the requirements of the Act are 
being met.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; State, Local or Tribal 
Government.
    Frequency: Annually and on occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1d5f9c8dfd4daf1d5ded29fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81e5c9f8efe4eac1e5eee2afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#246045524d407b764b57504f4156644b49460a414b540a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4c082d3a2528131e233f3827293e0c23212e6229233c622b233a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 8, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-13700 Filed 6-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      This Schedule contains summary financial  informa-
                              tion extracted from  financial  statements for the
                              fiscal quarter ended September 30,  1998  and   is
                              qualified in its entirety by reference   to   such
                              financial statements

</LEGEND>
     <CIK>                    823314
<NAME>                        Advanced Financial, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    United States
       
<S>                                                   <C>      
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                          MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                 1
<CASH>                                                     60,124
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               3,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           73,294
<PP&E>                                                  1,055,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                             15,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          1,128,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   3,971,331
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                 1,815
<COMMON>                                                    5,836
<OTHER-SE>                                             (3,138,812)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            1,128,741
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          107,776
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             286,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          (15,600)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         56,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (178,916)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (178,916)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.04)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of China Granite Corporation, a Nevada
Corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Costas Takkas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Granite Corporation, and will be retained by China Granite Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
 
 /s/
Costas Takkas
 Costas
Takkas
 Chief
Financial Officer
 April 14,
2005
Brian Sample 

Acting Chairperson 

Big Sandy Rancheria Tribal Council 

P.O. Box 337 

Auberry, California 93602 

Re: Amended Gaming Ordinance 

Dear Chairperson Sample: 

This letter is in response to your request to review and approve the amendment to the 

tribal gaming ordinance of the Auberry Big Sandy Band of Indians (Tribe). The amendment 

to the ordinance was adopted by the Tribe by Resolution No. 95-14 on April 23, 1997. 

Under the IGRA and the regulations of the National Indian Gaming Commission 

(NIGC), the NIGC Chairman is directed to review amendments to ordinances with respect to 

the requirements of the IGRA and the implementing regulations. Pursuant to the authority 

delegated to me in Part 11, Chapter 1, Section 2 of the NIGC Policies and Procedures Manual 

(1997), this letter constitutes such approval. 

Thank you for submitting the amendment to the tribal gaming ordinance of the 

Aubeny Big Sandy Band of Indians. The NIGC staff and I look forward to working with 

you and the Tribe in the implementation of the IGRA. 

Sincerely yours, 

Tom Foley 

Vice Chairman 
AUBERRY BIG SANDY BAND OF INDIANS 

AUBERRY, FRESNO COUNTY, CALLFQRNLA 

CLASS n AND CLASS m GAMING ORDINANCE 

IUSOLUTION NO, 95-14 

WHE'REAS, the Big Sandy Kancheria is a federally recognized Indian Tribe; and 

WHEREAS, the Big Sandy Rancheria Tribal Council is the governing body of the Big Sandy 

Rancheria; and 

WHEREAS, the Big Sandy Rancheria Tribal Council desires to amend the Gaming Ordinance 

95- 14, and 

WHEREAS, the Big Sandy Rancheria Tribal Council wishes to ensure that its governmental 

operations and related tnatters conform to all legal requirements; and 

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the Tribal Council of the Big Sandy 

Rancheria hereby authorizes its chairnlan, Brian Sample to sign the following ame~ldment to the 

Gaming Ordinance 95-14 and submit said amendment to the National Indian Gaming 

C:omtnission. 

AMENDMENT A 

1. In all instances, reference made to "Class 11" shall be replaced with "Class I1 and 

compacted Class Ill". 

2. Replace Section I1 with the following new language: 

"SECTION 11 GAMTNG AUTI-IORIZED 

Class IT and class 111 gaming subject to the establishment of a wrnpact with the 

State of California, as defined in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act P.L. 100-447, 25 

U.S.C. sections 2703 (7)(a) and 2702(8) ("IGRA") National Indian Gan~ing 

Commission at 25 C.F.R, section 502 3 (as published in the Federal Register at 57 FR 

12382-12393, April g, 1992 or any subsequerll ar~lendo~ents thereto) is Irereby 

authorized." 
The foregoing amendment to Gaming Ordinance 95-14 was adopted by a vote of for, and 

agaitlsl, and -0 abstentions, at a duly called telephonic meeting of the Tribal Council, at which a 

, quorum was present, on this ,;: day of hpQ/~ 1997. 

Eli~ Sandy Rancheria Tribal Council
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20419 Summary Calendar

KELJER KING, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CV-3904

- - - - - - - - - - February 19, 1998 Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Keljer King, prisoner #628021, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that counsel’s advice to him that he could be convicted of robbery under Texas law amounted to ineffective assistance which rendered his nolo contendre plea involuntary.No. 97-20419 -2- King has not presented “strong evidence” to overcome the presumption that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals accepted the trial court’s legal conclusion that King could have been convicted of robbery under Texas law. See Ylst v. Nunnemaker , 501 U.S. 797, 803 (1991). To establish ineffective assistance of counsel in the context of a nolo contendre plea, King must satisfy the two-prong test announced in Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52, 57 (1985) (guilty plea). King must show that counsel’s performance was deficient or that he was prejudiced as a result of the alleged deficiency. Strickland , 466 U.S. at 687. Since counsel’s advice was a correct statement of Texas law, King cannot demonstrate deficient performance. The district court did not err in refusing to grant federal habeas relief on King’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.
AFFIRMED.
ATV DRIP TORCH PRE-USE CHECKLIST

□ ATV personnel have proper PPE.

□ ATV is properly equipped and in serviceable condition.

1. Fire extinguisher 2A 10 B:C 

2. First aid kit

3. Tool kit

4. Hand tool

□ Frame and Mounting System

1. Mounting plates are firmly attached to the ATV rack.

2. ATV rack is securely attached, attachment hardware is tight.

3. Check torch frame welds for cracks or breaks.

4. Ejection system adjusted with holding clamps in place and secure.

□ Tanks - Fuel, Propane, Nitrogen 

1. Tanks are full and extras available for change out.

2. Tanks are secured and main tank is bolted down with no loose bolts.

3. Fuel (torch) tank cap is in place with serviceable gasket.

□ Wand

1. Break-away lock clamp adjusted to proper tension.

2. Wand length adjusted and clevis pin in place.

3. Propane igniter works properly and is secured to wand.

4. Trigger lock will hold trigger in on position.

5. Discharge check valve (at wand tip) stops flow of fuel when supply line is closed.

□ Gauges and Hoses

1. All hoses and fittings attached and connections are tight, look for kinks or deformed hoses.

2. Gauges function properly and are easy to read.

3. Nitrogen regulator gauges function properly and pressure is adjusted for correct flow.

4. Pressure relief valve is clean and operation checked manually (pull stem), over-pressurized to check automatic operation.  Valve should open automatically at 12-15 PSI.  DO NOT operate unit if valve fails to open in this pressure range.

□ All valves work properly.

1. Main supply fuel valve (under tank)

2. Fuel On-Off valve

3. Fuel metering valve

4. Propane On-Off valve