alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Ranell M. Jacobson, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Union Security Insurance Company; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 10, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          111907     
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                111907
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  150810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7140
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      143670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    150810
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1304
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (12396)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (12396)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (12396)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>
Not presented since all shares of common stock are held by a sole
shareholder.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHS
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John Schmitz, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ JOHN SCHMITZ                                        
| |                                                         
| | John Schmitz                                            
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer

July 12, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pedro Luna, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 474]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two resentences of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), both imposed February 1, 2006, on the ground that the resentences are excessive.

Ordered that the resentences are affirmed. No opinion. Florio, J.E, Santucci, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.
---

EXHIBIT 99d

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arbor, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen Spoonamore, in my capacity as Treasurer and acting Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
  Company.


|Date: May 1, 2003 | _______________________
    Stephen Spoonamore, Acting Chief Financial Officer
|----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00587-CV

Cielo Property Group, LLC; Robert Dillard III; and Robert Gandy IV, Appellants

v.

Branigan Mulcahy, Appellee

FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY 

NO. D-1-GN-18-003429, THE HONORABLE JAN SOIFER, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellants have filed an emergency motion for temporary relief, seeking a stay of 

the underlying proceedings during the pendency of their interlocutory appeal from an order 

denying their motion to compel arbitration. We grant the motion for temporary relief and stay 

the trial-court proceedings until the disposition of the appeal or until further order of this Court. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 29.3 (“[T]he appellate court may make any temporary orders necessary to 

preserve the parties’ rights until disposition of the appeal . . . .”).

It is ordered on September 20, 2018.

Before Justices Goodwin, Field, and Bourland
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

    Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
          Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements

         I, Eric Bescoby, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Lynn Skillen, Chief
Financial Officer, of Catalina Lighting, Inc., a Florida corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certify that:

         (a) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (b) The information contained in the Form 10-Q presents fairly, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                      * * *

Chief Executive Officer                              Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Eric Bescoby                                     /s/ Lynn Skillen
------------------------                             ---------------------------
Eric Bescoby                                         Lynn Skillen

Date: August 13, 2002                                Date: August 13, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             349
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   349
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                         339
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       349
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    19
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    10562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (10543)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (10543)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (10543)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        1<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1<F1>
<FN>
<F1>not presented since all shares of common stock are held by
a sole shareholder.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-15190 and 333-134206on Form S-3; in Registration Statement Nos. 333-40796, 33-54307, 333-95035, 333-91786 and 333-13809on Form S-8; and in Registration Statement No. 2-96386 on Form S-14 of our report dated February28, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphrelating to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.158), relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules ofPinnacle West Capital Corporation and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pinnacle West CapitalCorporation for the year ended December 31, 2006.Phoenix, Arizona
Exhibit 23

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Anaren Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-36761, No. 333-03193, No. 333-70397, No. 333-70427, No. 333-50390, and No.
333-50392) on Form S-8 and Registration Statement (No. 333-70422) on Form S-3 of
Anaren Inc. of our report dated August 6, 2004, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of Anaren Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2004 and June 30,
2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended June 30, 2004, which report appears in the June 30,
2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Anaren, Inc.

                                                        /s/ KPMG LLP

Syracuse, New York
August 27, 2004


                                       76
#### William S. SPEED et al., Plaintiffs, v. TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION, Defendant. Jack FRIEDMAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION, Defendant. Philip ZAHN, suing individually and on behalf of all similarly situated holders of Class A Common Stock of Axton-Fisher Tobacco Company, Plaintiff, v. TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION, Defendant.

Civ. A. Nos. 480, 468, 490.

United States District Court D. Delaware.

Dec. 28, 1955.

*493See also 135 F.Supp. 176.

Daniel O. Hastings and Clarence W. Taylor (of Hastings, Lynch & Taylor), Wilmington, Del., for plaintiffs and claimants.

Edwin D. Steel, Jr. (of Morris, Steel, Nichols & Arsht), Wilmington, Del., for defendant.

Herbert L. Cobin, Wilmington, Del., for intervenors.

LEAHY, Chief Judge.

On the application for increase in bond on appeal for costs, two guides are relevant. First, there is F.R. 73(c), 28 U.S.C., which deals with increase of bond for costs incurred in connection with any appeal. Our Court of Appeals Rule 35(4) specifically deals with the items of costs for printing briefs and appendices. These are costs which are fixed by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals, subject to review by that Court.

I think the matter of potential costs in connection with any pending appeal should be exclusively within the control of the Judges of the Court of Appeals. Hence, any application to increase a cost bond to secure payment of potential costs to be finally awarded to the successful party, should be presented to the Judges of the Court of Appeals.

However, Professor Moore1 believes (perhaps correctly) F.R. 73(e) was incorporated into Rule 73 to give the trial judge jurisdiction to pass on a motion for insufficiency of cost bonds on appeal. This distinction is based on the verbal-ism between a dissatisfied litigant “filing” an appeal or whether the appeal “is not yet docketed with the appellate court”. I am of the view once a litigant commences to operate the procedural machinery for an appeal, the district court loses jurisdiction.

But, if I do have jurisdictional power to pass on the question of sufficiency of the present cost bonds filed by plaintiffs, then my views are these:

This case presents, at bottom, questions of law. Defendant should be able to discuss the case in its briefs. If resort is had to the factual findings, Rule 16(1) of the Court of Appeals provides for the filing of all original papers necessary to constitute' a record on appeal. Subdivision (2) of the Rule provides for the filing of the transcript of testimony. There is little necessity for *494printing all the transcripts, both before the Court and the Special Master, and the exhibits. Moreover, F.R. 75 (k) provides, where more than one appeal is taken to the same Court from the same judgment, a single record on appeal shall be sufficient. In this case, there is no necessity for duplication which will result in a massive record for the Court of Appeals.

Motions to increase plaintiffs’ cost bonds already filed will be denied.

1

. 7 Moore’s Federal Practice pp. 3184-85.
Exhibit 12(e)Entergy New Orleans, Inc.Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges andRatios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends2003
2004
2005
2006
2007Fixed charges, as defined:Total Interest
$17,786
$16,610
$13,555
$19,329
$21,497Interest applicable to rentals
910
644
426
527
407Total fixed charges, as defined
18,696
17,254
13,981
19,856
21,904Preferred dividends, as defined (a)
1,686
1,545
1,172
2,501
1,745Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined
$20,382
$18,799
$15,153
$22,357
$23,649Earnings as defined:Net Income (loss)
$7,859
$28,072
$1,250
$5,344
$24,582Add:Provision for income taxes:Total
5,875
16,868
1,790
5,051
13,506Fixed charges as above
18,696
17,254
13,981
19,856
21,904Total earnings, as defined
$32,430
$62,194
$17,021
$30,251
$59,992Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined (b)
1.73
3.60
1.22
1.52
2.74Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges andpreferred dividends, as defined
1.59
3.31
1.12
1.35
2.54------------------------(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by
dividing the preferred dividendrequirement by one hundred percent (100%) minus the income tax rate.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 dated October 14, 1988 and
Form S-8 dated December 28, 1994) pertaining to the 1988 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the 1994 Incentive Stock Option Plan of K2 Inc. of our report dated
February 23, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of K2 Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000. We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 dated August 9, 1999) of K2 Inc. and in the related Proxy Statement of
our report dated February 23, 2001 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of K2 Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.

Our
audits also include the financial statement schedule of K2 Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

logo

Los
Angeles, California
March 26, 2001

---

QuickLinks
[945 NE2d 1027, 920 NYS2d 776]

#### William B. Clarke, Respondent, v Rafael Rodriguez, Appellant.

Decided March 29, 2011

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Law Offices of Thomas Weiss, P.C.,*Hempstead *(Thomas Weiss*of counsel), for appellant.

*Ramo, Nashak, Brown & Garibaldi LLP,*Glendale *(Gregory J. Brown*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

There is support in the record for the affirmed finding that the original contract was in the possession or control of defendant. Upon due notice, defendant failed to produce the original. Accordingly, plaintiff sufficiently explained the unavailability of the original contract and, therefore, a photocopy was admissible as secondary evidence of its contents *(see Schozer v William*
      *816
      *Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.,*84 NY2d 639, 643-644 [1994]). Moreover, as there is support for the undisturbed finding of Supreme Court that defendant frustrated plaintiffs efforts to perform the contract, plaintiff is entitled to the remedy of specific performance *(see Kooleraire Serv. & Installation Corp. v Board of Educ. of City of NY.,*28 NY2d 101, 106 [1971]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Exhibit 12

             WASHINGTON MUTUAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>

                                                        Year Ended December 31,
                                   -------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands)                 2002         2001          2000        1999         1998
                                   ---------    ---------    ----------   ---------    ---------
Income from continuing operations
<S>                                <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
before income taxes                $  70,114    $  84,328    $  114,033   $ 107,055    $  76,910
                                   ---------    ---------    ----------   ---------    ---------

Fixed charges:
Interest and debt
expense on all
indebtedness                         168,793      191,125       181,050     133,687      120,587

Appropriate portion
of rentals (33%)                       3,779        3,857         3,830       3,765        3,636
                                   ---------    ---------    ----------   ---------    ---------

Total fixed charges                  172,572      194,982       184,880     137,452      124,223
                                   ---------    ---------    ----------   ---------    ---------

Earnings available for
fixed charges                      $ 242,686    $ 279,310    $  298,913   $ 244,507    $ 201,133
                                   =========    =========    ==========   =========    =========

Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges                           1.41         1.43          1.62        1.78         1.62
                                   =========    =========    ==========   =========    =========

</TABLE>