alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13a-14(a)

CERTIFICATION

I, John C. Fanning, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of COMFORCE Corporation, hereby certify that:

1. I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of COMFORCE Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 20, 2006



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ John C. Fanning                 
|John C. Fanning,                    
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



E-6
**Exhibit 32.2**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Randy Jones
 Randy Jones
 Acting Chief Financial Officer
 November 19, 2004
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1084

KENNETH D. BELL, in his capacity as court

- appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
LI YU CHEN , Appellant , and TODD DISNER; TRUDY GILMOND; TRUDY GILMOND, LLC; JERRY NAPIER; DARREN MILLER; RHONDA GATES; DAVID SORRELLS; INNOVATION MARKETING LLC; AARON ANDREWS; SHARA ANDREWS; GLOBAL INTERNET FORMULA, INC.; T. LEMONT SILVE R; KAREN SILVER; MICHAEL VAN LEEUWEN; DURANT BROCKETT; DAVID KETTNER; MARY KETTNER; P.A.W.S. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC; LORI JEAN WEBER; A DEFENDANT CLASS OF NET WINNERS IN ZEEKREWARDS.COM; DEFENDANT CLASS , Defendants

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv
- 00091

- GCM )

Submitted : July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Li Yu Chen, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth D. Bell, Irving Michael Brenner, MCGUIREWOOD, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this ci rcuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Li Yu Chen appeals the district court’s order granting Plaintiff ’ s motion for summary judgment and ordering that Chen return profits derived from a Ponzi scheme

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error . Accordingly, we grant Chen’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, but affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Bell v. Chen , No. 3:14

- cv
- 00091

- GCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the fac ts and legal co ntentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Union Security Insurance Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stacia N. Almquist, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 12, 2008



/s/ Stacia N. AlmquistStacia N. Almquist Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,106
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,224
<BONDS>                                         75,206
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                       220,044
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,236,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,252
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,938
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (206)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (46,144)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (46,144)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (46,144)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Jon D. Klugh, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Infinity, Inc.;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

     5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 19, 2003


/s/ Jon D. Klugh
Jon D. Klugh, Chief Financial Officer
ASSOCIATE GENERAL COUNSEL

SHARON AVERY

Sharon M. Avery is an Associate General Counsel in the NIGC’S Office of General 

Counsel.

Prior to joining the NIGC, Sharon served as General Counsel for Tribal Operations 

for the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan. Sharon served as General 

Counsel for the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan for 3 years and prior to 

that worked in the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan’s Legal Department 

for 7 years as a Senior Associate General Counsel and Associate General Counsel. 

Sharon graduated Cum Laude from Central Michigan University in 2003 with a

Bachelor of Science degree. She graduated from Michigan State University College 

of Law in 2009 with a Juris Doctor degree and a certificate from the Indigenous Law 

& Policy Center.

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act created the National Indian Gaming Commission to support tribal self-sufficiency and the integrity of 

Indian gaming. NIGC oversees the efficient regulation of 524 gaming establishments operated by 248 tribes across 29 states.

Updated 9/17/2021

Biography

National Indian Gaming Commission
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          53,055
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,055
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,140
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,055
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   572
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,128)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,208)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,208)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>
Not presented since all shares of common stock are held by a sole
shareholder.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 11

Calculation of Basic Earnings Per Share

|                                                     |  | Year Ended |             |   |   |           
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | ----------- | - | - | ----------
|
|
|Net (loss) earnings                                  |  | $          | (21,031,000 | ) | $ | (2,980,000
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |  |            | 24,198,000  |   |   | 24,196,000
|Basic (loss) earnings per share                      |  | $          | (.87        | ) | $ | (.12      

Calculation of Diluted Earnings Per Share

|                                                                                        |  | Year Ended |             |   |   |           
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | ----------- | - | - | ----------
|
|
|Net (loss) earnings                                                                     |  | $          | (21,031,000 | ) | $ | (2,980,000
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                                    |  |            | 24,198,000  |   |   | 24,196,000
|Dilutive effect of stock options outstanding after application of treasury stock method |  |            | 0           |   |   | 0         
|Adjusted weighted average shares                                                        |  |            | 24,198,000  |   |   | 24,196,000
|Diluted (loss) earnings per share                                                       |  | $          | (.87        | ) | $ | (.12      

---

QuickLinks
96-2443.

#### State ex rel. Hamilton v. Fifth Dist. Court of Appeals.

In Mandamus. On February 26, 1997, relator filed a document titled “Motion for Declaratory Judgment for “Writ of Mandamus’.” It appears to the court that relator’s motion is, in substance, a request for reconsideration of this court’s entry of January 15, 1997, and, as such, is untimely *1418pursuant, to S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(A). Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(2)(C) prohibits the filing of an untimely motion for reconsideration,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that appellant’s motion be, and hereby is, stricken.
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.









|/s/ Leo P. DenaultLeo P. Denault
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Entergy Corporation
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:	February 27, 2009
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6459

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. WILLIE EDWARD BARNES, a/k/a Big Will , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. ( 3:08

- cr - 00064

- GMG

- RWT

- 1 )

Submitted : September 26, 2017 Decided: September 28, 2017

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Willie Edward Barnes , Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg , West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are n ot binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Willie Edward Barnes seeks to appeal from the district court’s order construing his petition for a writ of audita querela as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion to vacate and dismissing the motion as unti mely. We conclude that Barnes ’ motion was in substance a successive § 2255 motion. The district court’s order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barnes has not made the requisite showing. The district court lacked jurisdiction to deny § 2255 relief
on the merits because Barnes ’ motion challenged th e validity of his sentence and should have been construed as a successive § 2255 motion. See Gonzalez v. Crosby , 545 U.S. 524, 531

– 32 (2005); United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 207 (4th Cir. 2003).3 In the absence of pre

- filing authorization from t his court, the district court lacked jurisdiction to hear a successive § 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3) (2012). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and l egal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
National Indian Gaming Commission 

Regulatory Review 

Tribal Consultation Agenda 

9:00am Opening & Introduction of Tribal Representative – Commissioner 

9:05am Tribal Welcome – Tribal Representative 

 Introductions of Tribal Leaders 

9:20am Introduction of Commission and Staff – Commissioner 

9:30am Summary of Regulation Group Scheduled for Review 

9:45am Tribal Comments 

10:30am Break 

10:45am Tribal Comments 

12:00pm Lunch 

1:30pm Tribal Comments 

3:00pm Break 

3:15pm Tribal Comments 

5:00pm Closing – Commissioner
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Santiago Alvarez, Appellant.

Submitted May 29, 2012;

decided May 31, 2012

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
Please use this button to print

& submit via fax to

(202) 632-0045

National Indian Gaming Commission

Portland Region

Attendee Information

Name (First & Last) Position/Title

Business Street address City/State/Zip

Business E-mail address

**All fields are required**

NOTE: Please use a separate form for each attendee

Business contact phone number

*include area code - numbers only please

Entity registrant represents

Tribe Information

Ext.

If you do not represent a Tribe/Tribal Casino/Tribal Gaming

Commission entity, please enter agency name above.

Please use this button to submit

via E-mail (Outlook or Internet

based e-mail)

or

For further information or questions, please contact:

Tribe Name

Regulatory Review Consultation

Tulalip Resort Casino

Tulalip, WA

 July 14-15, 2011

Rita Homa

Executive Assistant

1441 L Street, N.W. Suite 9100

Washington, DC 20005

Phone: (202) 418-9807

Consultation Registration Form