alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,837]

In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 22, 2009, in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Duro Textiles, LLC, Fall River, Massachusetts.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 1st day of May 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13457 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM ANACOMP, INC.'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12 MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                                    19,415
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             90,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                               7,367
<INVENTORY>                                               53,995
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         175,193
<PP&E>                                                   141,881
<DEPRECIATION>                                            96,898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           421,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    188,957
<BONDS>                                                  389,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                               24,574
<OTHER-SE>                                              (188,243)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             421,029
<SALES>                                                  371,308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         591,189
<CGS>                                                    279,456
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            719,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           4,199
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           3,817
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        70,938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (203,326)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              35,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (238,326)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (240,484)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (5.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (5.22)
        

</TABLE>
----

Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATION

I, _John L. Threshie Jr., certify that: 

(1) I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of The TirexCorporation; 

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small businessissuer and have: 

(a) 

Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) 

Evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

(c) 

Disclosed inthis report any change in the small business issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financialreporting; and 

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

(a) 

All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

(b) 

Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financialreporting. 

/s/ 

  John L. Threshie Jr                                   John L. Threshie Jr., CEO 

Date: February 13, 2008 

----
{"agency":"NIGC","generated":"2020-10-07 16:30:11","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"},{"label":"2020","value":"2020"}],"value":"2020"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":null}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["NIGC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["4"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["3"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["3"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2020","quarter":"Q2"}
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of KT
Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does
hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that: The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, as amended, (the Form
20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: July 18, 2005
    
    /s/ Yong-Kyung LeeYong-Kyung LeePresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated: July 18, 2005
    
    /s/ Haing Min KwonHaing Min KwonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to KT Corporation and will be retained by KT Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-04-239-CV

CINDY SEALE, AS NEXT FRIEND OF	APPELLANTS

KATHERINE M. WATTS, AND  

KATHERINE M. WATTS

	V.

HERITAGE ST. JOSEPH GARDENS IN 	APPELLEES

ITS ASSUMED OR COMMON NAME; 

HERITAGE GERIATRIC HOUSING DEVELOPMENT

IX, INC.; INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A HERITAGE

ST. JOSEPH GARDENS; HERITAGE HOUSING

DEVELOPMENT, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND

D/B/A HERITAGE ST. JOSEPH GARDENS;

HERITAGE HOUSING V, INC., INDIVIDUALLY

AND D/B/A HERITAGE ST. JOSEPH GARDENS

	----------

	FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	On September 27, 2004, we notified appellants that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the clerk’s record in this appeal informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the record as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and provided this court with proof of payment.

	Because appellants have not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

	Appellants shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 12, 2004
**Exhibit
21**








**Subsidiaries
of Registrant**


**Year
Ended January 1, 2005**








**Subsidiaries**
    
    **State
      or Jurisdiction of Incorporation**
    
    **Percentage
      of Voting**
      **Securities
      Owned**AiC
      Analysts Limited
    
    United
      Kingdom
    
    100.0%Medical
      Concepts Staffing, Inc.
    
    Minnesota
    
    100.0%Analysts
      International Strategic Sourcing Services, LLC
    
    Minnesota
    
    100.0%Analysts
      International Business Resources Services, LLC
    
    Minnesota
    
    100.0%Analysts
      International Business Solutions Services, LLC
    
    Minnesota
    
    100.0%Analysts
      International Management Services, LLC
    
    Minnesota
    
    100.0%
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27357-27358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13612]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meeting

Board Votes To Close June 8, 2009 Meeting

    At its closed session meeting on June 2, 2009, the Board of 
Governors of the

[[Page 27358]]

United States Postal Service voted unanimously to close to public 
observation its meeting to be held on June 8, 2009, in Washington, DC 
via teleconference. The Board determined that no earlier public notice 
was possible.

Items Considered

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Financial Matters.
    3. Pricing.
    4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    5. Governors' Executive Session--discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

General Counsel Certification

    The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has 
certified that the meeting is properly closed under the Government in 
the Sunshine Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for information about the 
meeting should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board, Julie S. 
Moore, at (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13612 Filed 6-5-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0256 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LEA ALEX YATES II,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including Ju ly 13, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brie f on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 6 2022

06/06/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0256
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00286-CV

J. T., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY, 

NO. 19157, THE HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due to be filed on 

May 18, 2015. By request to this Court dated May 18, 2015, Gayla R. May requested an 

extension of ten days.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure prohibit this Court from granting 

extensions of over 10 days for the filing of reporters’ records in accelerated appeals, including 

those from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Further, any 

extensions of time granted for the filing of the reporters’ records may not exceed 30 days 

cumulatively. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(2). Accordingly, Gayla R. May is hereby ordered to 

file the reporter’s record in this case on or before May 29, 2015. If the record is not filed by that 

date, May may be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on May 19, 2015.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2645 

To suspend temporarily the duty on hybrid electric vehicle inverter. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on hybrid electric vehicle 

inverter. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE INVERTER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Inverters for converting DC 

battery output to three phase 

AC output used to power an 

electric drive motor, certified 

by the importer for use in hybrid electric vehicles (provided for in subheading 

8504.40.95) ........................... 1.0% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2645 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.2Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (on Form S-8 Nos.33-86090, 333-13355, 333-49355, 333-87855 and 333-117243 pertaining to the Rent-Way, Inc. StockOption Plan and Form S-3 and related prospectus Nos. 333-116635, 333-107022 and 333-102525) ofRent-Way, Inc. of our reports dated December 16, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Rent-Way, Inc., Rent-Way, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Rent-Way, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September30, 2005./s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPPittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,865]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 29, 2009, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Seel Tool and Die, St. Marys, Pennsylvania.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

      ( print page 27352)    
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of May 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13472 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Appendix 1**

**Fire and Aviation Preparedness Review Guide**

**Suggested Drill**

**Drill #13*Fire and Aviation Preparedness Review Guide***

**Helitack/Longline**

April 2000

A-

Drill 13-1Revised 2008
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angelo Meyes, Appellant.

[977 NYS2d 27]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered October 22, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the first and second degrees, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it denied defendant’s application to present expert testimony on eyewitness identification. The victim’s identification of defendant was both highly reliable and corroborated by strong circumstantial evidence that did not depend on the accuracy of the identification.

In addition to evidence that the police arrested defendant within a few blocks of the scene of the crime within minutes after the crime occurred, that defendant was the only person in the area, and that defendant matched the victim’s description of the perpetrator, the evidence showed that the victim followed defendant and had him under observation for the entire period between the crime and the arrest, except for very brief intervals. Given the circumstances under which defendant was observed and apprehended, expert testimony on identification would have been of little or no value to the jury *(see People v Zohri,*82 AD3d 493 [1st Dept 2011], *lv denied*16 NY3d 901 [2011]). These circumstances were independent of the victim’s identification itself, and they constituted “significant corroborating evidence” *(id.*at 494). The victim had ample opportunity to observe defendant, and his accurate description of defendant’s unusual hairstyle far outweighed any alleged deficiencies in the description.

Defendant did not preserve his particular challenges to the procedures by which the court disposed of the reverse *Batson*application *(see People u Richardson,*100 NY2d 847, 853 [2003]; *People v Smocum,*99 NY2d 418, 423-424 [2003]), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative hold*517ing, we also reject them on the merits *(see People v Payne,*88 NY2d 172, 184 [1996]). The record supports the court’s express and implied findings *(see Payne,*88 NY2d at 185) that the race-neutral reasons provided by defense counsel for the peremptory challenge at issue were pretextual. The court’s reasoning is supported by the record, which shows that other people who were victims of violent crime were seated and selected as alternates. These findings, based primarily on the court’s assessment of counsel’s credibility, are entitled to great deference *(see Snyder v Louisiana,*552 US 472, 477 [2008]; *People v Hernandez,*75 NY2d 350, 356 [1990], *affd*500 US 352 [1991]; *People v Chicco,*19 AD3d 199, 199 [1st Dept 2005]). Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephanie Guerrero CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-10823.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 2006.

Jeffrey Robert, HAAG, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jerry Y. Beard, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Stephanie Guerrero Cruz, former federal prisoner #24616-180, appeals the 18-month sentence she received after her term of supervised release was revoked. Given that Cruz has been released from prison and is not serving a term of supervised release, her appeal is moot. *See Spencer v. Kemna,*523 U.S. 1, 12-18, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); *United States v. Clark,*193 F.3d 845, 847-48 (5th Cir.1999).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.