alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Gary Kouletas, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report of Form 10-Q of Hybred International, Inc.



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to me by others within the company, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and



b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements fort external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and



c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based upon such evaluation; and



d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);



a)

All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.



Date: November 12, 2009

/s/ Gary Kouletas

Gary Kouletas

President (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

        In connectionwith the quarterly report of Medical Technology Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Todd E. Siegel,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

    (1)                 The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

    (2)                 The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statements (Nos. 333-143232 and 333-143233) on Form S-8 of our report dated October 9, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements of AIM SERVICES Co., Ltd. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to (1) that accounting principles generally accepted in Japan vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as
discussed in Note 12 and (2) that the audits also comprehended the translation of Japanese yen amounts into U.S. dollar amounts and such translation has been made in conformity with the basis stated in Note 1) appearing in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of ARAMARK Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended October 2, 2009.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
|                            
|Tokyo, Japan                
|December 14, 2009
Exhibit 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form  S-8  No.   33-52125)   pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.   Deferred
Compensation  and Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee  Directors,  in the
Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  2-95022)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc.  Amended Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees,  in the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-32612)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Employee
Savings  Plan,  in the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  33-55922)
pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.  1993  Stock   Incentive  Plan,  in  the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.  33-49907)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc. Leveraged Employee Stock Ownership Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form  S-8  No.   33-62901)   pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.   Deferred
Compensation  Plan, in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-33617)
pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.  1997  Stock   Incentive  Plan,  in  the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-78675)   pertaining  to  the
registration  of  68,925  shares  of  Ashland  Inc.  Common  Stock,  in the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-36842)   pertaining  to  the
registration  of  96,600  shares  of  Ashland  Inc.  Common  Stock,  in the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-54762)   pertaining  to  the
registration  of  149,300  shares of  Ashland  Inc.  Common  Stock,  in the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-82830)   pertaining  to  the
registration  of  265,100  shares of  Ashland  Inc.  Common  Stock,  in the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-105396)  pertaining  to  the
registration  of 296,385  shares of Ashland Inc.  Common Stock,  and in the
Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-69138) pertaining to the offering
of $600,000,000 of Debt  Securities,  Preferred Stock,  Depository  Shares,
Common Stock and/or  Warrants of Ashland Inc., of our report dated November
24,  2003,  with  respect  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
schedule of Ashland Inc.  and  consolidated  subsidiaries  included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2003.



/s/ Ernst & Young

Cincinnati, Ohio
November 24, 2003
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3012 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2–116th Street in North Troy, New York, as the Martin G. ‘‘Marty’’ 

Mahar Post Office. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2010 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2–116th Street in North Troy, New York, 

as the Martin G. ‘‘Marty’’ Mahar Post Office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MARTIN G. ‘‘MARTY’’ MAHAR POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 2–116th Street in North Troy, 

6 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Martin 

7 G. ‘Marty’ Mahar Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3012 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Martin G. ‘Marty’ 

3 Mahar Post Office’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 113 (Monday, June 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13897]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,690]


Tube Fabrication Industries, Inc., Logansport, IN; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 27, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Tube Fabrication 
Industries, Inc., Logansport, Indiana. The workers at the subject 
facility produce steel tube components.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 18th day of May 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13897 Filed 6-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re Michael Shane Tinsley, * Original Mandamus Proceeding

No. 11

- 18

- 00328

- CR * November 29, 2018

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has considered Relator’s peti tion for writ of mandamus and

concludes that the writ of mandamus should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction

.

Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the petition for writ of

mandamus is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<NAME>                        BENTLEY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 
<CIK>                         0000821616
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998       
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1998                 
<CASH>                          9,471
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,916
<ALLOWANCES>                    (57)
<INVENTORY>                     757
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                13,690
<PP&E>                          4,340
<DEPRECIATION>                  (2,849)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  19,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           4,178 
<BONDS>                         5,381
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           2,406
<PREFERRED>                     2,406
<COMMON>                        168
<OTHER-SE>                      6,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    19,245
<SALES>                         3,358
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                3,492
<CGS>                           1,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   4,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (1,603)
<INCOME-TAX>                    218
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (1,821)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,821)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.22)
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Pitter

Case below: 180 N.C. App. 474

No. 640P06

Def-Appellant’s PDR (COA05-1547)

Denied 06/27/07
No. 893.

#### United States Gypsum Co. *v.*Galeota.

March 2, 1942.

*Mr. T. Carl Nixon*for petitioner. *Mr. William L. Clay*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
January 31, 2011

Lael Echo-Hawl

Counselor to the Chait

National Indian Gaming Commission
1441 L Street NW

Suite 9100

Washington D.C. 20005

Dear Counselor Echo-Hawk:

We, the Commissioners of the Nisqually Tribal Gaming Commission, with consent of the Nisqually Indian
Tribal Council take this opportunity to offer comments.

CFR 25 Part 514 NIGC Fee Calculation

The Nisqually Tribal Gaming Commission would support calculating fees on an annual basis dependent on and
consistent with the financial calendar of the tribal gaming enterprise;

CFR 25 Pact 514 Late Payment System

Issuing an NOV as a violation for submitting fees untimely is not in the best interest of displaying a
cooperative working telationship between the ‘Tribes and NIGC. We feel late notices with a progressive
approach would be much more amenable;

CER 25 Part 537 Appeal of an NOV
We agree that when NIGC has clear authority to issue an NOV that there must be a concise outline and
procedure for dispute resolution including that which allows for equal protections for those patties involved;

FR 25 Part 542 Class III Minimum Internal Control Standards
‘The Nisqually Indian Tribe strongly supports the CRIT decision citing that NIGC has no authority to enforce
or promulgate internal control standards in regatd to Class III gaming. The Nisqually ‘Tribal Gaming
Commission respectfully suggests that the MICS should be presented as recommendations only and each Tribe
should adopt their own Minimum Internal Controls Standards in compliance with the Tribal-State Compact
and Minimum Internal Control recommendations from NIGC that best protect the assets of the Tribe. The

Primary Regulators of the Tribe need to be fully recognized as being best suited to determine the level of
compliance to protect tribal assets.

CER 25 Part 573 Enforcement

We would urge NIGC to develop a policy that allows NIGC to withdraw an NOY. Should new information
come to light, aa issue was timely resolved, or the NOV was issued in error, the NOV being withdrawn would
be in the best interest of dealing with Tribes in good faith.

On behalf of the members of the Nisqually Tribal Gaming Commission, thank you in advance for the
opportunity to submit comments during this consultation petiod.

Respect
Inez Dover Slape
Chair

12819 Yelm Ifighway SL: * Olympia, WA 98513 * phone 360-486-8500 + fax 360-486-8512
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop #1621 Washington, DC 20240 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 WWW.NIGC.GOV

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK; Oklahoma City, OK

April 20, 2021

Cyrus Ben, Chief

Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians

PO Box 6010

101 Industrial Rd

Choctaw, MS 39350

Re: MS Band of Choctaw Indians Gaming Ordinance No. 16-KKKKK

Dear Chief Ben:

This letter responds to the January 22, 2021 request from Interim Attorney General 

Melissa Carleton on behalf of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians for the National Indian 

Gaming Commission Chairman to review and approve an amended gaming ordinance. 

Resolution Number 16-KKKKK amends the Band’s Gaming Ordinance to address recent 

changes to the FBI’s authority to conduct background checks on applicants for key employee and 

primary management official positions. 

The gaming ordinance is consistent with the requirements of the Indian Gaming 

Regulatory Act and NIGC regulations, and is hereby approved. If you have any questions 

concerning this letter or the ordinance review process, please contact Jennifer Lawson at 

Jennifer_lawson@nigc.gov.

Sincerely,

E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Chairman

cc: Melissa Carleton, Interim Attorney General, Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians
Exhibit 32(e)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael D. Bakewell, President and Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Louisiana Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"),certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.









|/s/ Michael D. BakewellMichael D. Bakewell
President and Chief Executive Officer of
Entergy Louisiana Holdings, Inc.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	March 9, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Casey, Appellant.

[822 NYS2d 467]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), rendered March 25, 1991, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant youthful offender treatment *(see*CPL 720.20 [1]; *People v Kinloch,*7 AD3d 734, 735 [2004]; *People v Gonzalez,*265 AD2d 216 [1999]). Prudenti, EJ., Mastro, Fisher and Lunn, JJ., concur.
J

- S63038

- 15

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellee : : v. : : DONALD FRANCIS , : : Appellant : No. 916 EDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence entered on February 11, 2015

in the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Criminal Division, No(s): CP

- 39

- CR

- 0004292

- 2014;

CP

- 39

- CR

- 0004317

- 2014
BE FORE: DONOHUE, MUNDY and MUSMANNO, JJ. JUDGMENT ORDER BY MUSMANNO, J. : FILED NOVEMBER 12, 2015 Donald Francis (“Francis”) appeals from the judgment of sentence
i mposed following his guilty plea to possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance. See 35 P.S. § 780

- 113(a)(16), (30). Francis’s counsel, Amy E. Sonin, Esquire (“Sonin”), ostensibly seeking to withdraw her representation, has filed a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). See Anders Brief at 7,
11

- 12, 18

- 23.
Pursuant to Anders , when counsel believes an appeal is frivolous and wishes to withdraw from representation, he/she must (1) petition the [C]ourt for leave to withdraw stating that after making a conscientious examination of the record, counsel has determined the appeal would be frivolous; (2) file a brief referring to any issues that might arguably support the appeal, but which does not resemble a no

- merit letter; and (3) furnish aJ

- S63038

- 15

- 2

-

copy of the brief to the defendant and advise him of his right to retain new counsel, proceed pro se, or raise any additional points he deems worthy of this Court’s attention. Commonwealth v. Ed wards , 906 A.2d 1225, 1227 (Pa. Super. 2006) (citation omitted); see also Commonwealth v. Santiago , 978 A.2d 349, 361 (Pa. 2009) (setting forth the requirements of the contents of an Anders brief). Here, Sonin’s brief fulfills the requirements of Anders a nd Santiago

. Moreover, Sonin provided Francis with notice of her intention to seek permission to withdraw from representation, a copy of the Anders Brief filed on his behalf, and advised Francis of his rights in lieu of representation. However, Sonin has failed to file a petition to withdraw as counsel with this
Court. 1 See Edwards , 906 A.2d at 1227. We hereby Order Sonin to either file a proper petition to withdraw that fulfills the requirements of Anders with this Court, or file an advocate’s brief wit hin thirty (30) days of the date this Order is filed. In the event Sonin files an advocate’s brief, the Commonwealth will be permitted thirty (30) days to respond from the filing of the brief. Panel jurisdiction retained. Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

1 We note that Sonin appears to have provided a petition to withdraw to Francis. See Letter, 6/5/15. However, no petition was filed with this Court.J

- S63038

- 15

- 3

-

Date: 11/12/2015
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3088 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3088

     To reduce the number of executive branch political appointees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2010

  Mr. Feingold (for himself and Mr. McCain) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reduce the number of executive branch political appointees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reduce Bureaucracy Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF POLITICAL APPOINTEES.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``political appointee'' 
means any individual who--
            (1) is employed in a position on the executive schedule 
        under sections 5312 through 5316 of title 5, United States 
        Code;
            (2) is a limited term appointee, limited emergency 
        appointee, or noncareer appointee in the senior executive 
        service as defined under section 3132(a) (5), (6), and (7) of 
        title 5, United States Code, respectively; or
            (3) is employed in a position in the executive branch of 
        the Government of a confidential or policy-determining 
        character under Schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5 
        of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    (b) Limitation.--The President, acting through the Office of 
Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management, shall 
take such actions as necessary to ensure that the total number of 
political appointees shall not exceed 2,000.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect 1 year after 
the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```