alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13471]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,864]


Baker Furniture, Hickory, NC; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 29, 2009, in response to a worker 
petition filed by workers of Baker Furniture, Hickory, North Carolina.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of May 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13471 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
| (1)    | The      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,      2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and        |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods presented in the    Report. |

| /s/ John R. HerronJohn      T. HerronChairman,      President, and Chief Executive Officer ofSystem      Energy Resources, Inc. |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of China Granite Corporation a Nevada
corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
2003,  as  filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"), Dong Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the  best  of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  ss.  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the  Company.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  China  Granite  Corporation, and will be retained by China Granite
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon  request.


/s/ Dong Chen
--------------------------
Dong Chen
Chief Executive Officer
April 13, 2004


<PAGE>
NIGC.GOV

GGRFY2022GAMINGREVENUE

COMPARISON

GGR FY 2022

FY 2022 FY 2021

Increase / 

(Decrease)

% of 

Change

Portland 4,483,512,096 4,440,688,687 42,823,409 1.0%

Sacramento 11,759,106,562 11,926,737,084 (167,630,522) (1.4%)

Phoenix 3,722,950,358 3,217,759,740 505,190,618 15.7%

St. Paul 4,950,589,631 4,787,386,386 163,203,245 3.4%

Rapid City 406,169,922 372,306,820 33,863,102 9.1%

Tulsa 3,489,234,645 3,155,036,484 334,198,161 10.6%

Oklahoma City 3,149,318,979 3,027,386,184 121,932,795 4.0%

D.C. 8,976,860,441 8,098,283,597 878,576,844 10.8%

Totals 40,937,742,634 39,025,584,982 1,912,157,652 4.9%
Exhibit 24

DATE:     January 26, 1996

TO:       Louis E. Buck, Jr.
          Laurence M. Hamric

FROM:     Edwin Lupberger, et. al.

SUBJECT:  Power of Attorney


Entergy Corporation, referred to herein as the Company, will
file  with the Securities and Exchange Commission its Annual
Report  on  Form 10-K for the year ended December  31,  1995
pursuant  to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
Act of 1934.

The   Company  and  the  undersigned,  in  their  respective
capacities  as directors and/or officers of said Company  as
specified  in Attachment I, do each hereby make,  constitute
and  appoint Louis E. Buck, Jr. and Laurence M. Hamric, and
each  of  them, their true and lawful Attorneys  (with  full
power  of substitution) for each of the undersigned  and  in
his  or  her name, place and stead to sign and cause  to  be
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  the
aforementioned Annual Report on Form 10-K and any amendments
thereto.

Yours very truly,

Entergy Corporation




By:     /s/ Edwin Lupberger
  Edwin Lupberger                     Gerald D. McInvale
Chairman of the Board and            Senior Vice President
and Chief Executive Officer          Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>

__/s/ W. Frank Blount               ____/s/ John A. Cooper,Jr.
  W. Frank Blount                    John A. Cooper, Jr.




__/s/ Lucie J. Fjeldstad            __/s/ Norman C. Francis
 Lucie J. Fjeldstad                   Norman C. Francis




__/s/ Kaneaster Hodges, Jr.         ____/s/ Robert v.d. Luft
Kaneaster Hodges, Jr.                  Robert v.d. Luft




___/s/ Edwin Lupberger               ___/s/ Kinnaird R. McKee
  Edwin Lupberger                     Kinnaird R. McKee




___/s/ Paul W. Murrill               _____/s/ James R. Nichols
  Paul W. Murrill                      James R. Nichols




_____/s/ Eugene H. Owen              ___/s/ John N. Palmer, Sr.
   Eugene H. Owen                    John N. Palmer, Sr.




_____/s/ Robert D. Pugh              ___/s/ H. Duke Shackelford
   Robert D. Pugh                    H. Duke Shackelford




___/s/ Wm. Clifford Smith            __/s/ Bismark A. Steinhagen
 Wm. Clifford Smith                  Bismark A. Steinhagen


<PAGE>

Entergy Corporation

Chairman  of  the Board, President, Chief Executive  Officer
and Director (principal executive officer) - Edwin Lupberger

Executive   Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial   Officer
(principal financial officer) - Gerald D. McInvale

Directors - W. Frank Blount, John A. Cooper, Jr.,  Lucie  J.
Fjeldstad, Norman C. Francis, Kaneaster Hodges, Jr.,  Robert
v.d.   Luft,   Kinnaird   R.   McKee,   Paul   W.   Murrill,
James  R.  Nichols,  Eugene H. Owen, John  N.  Palmer,  Sr.,
Robert  D.  Pugh,  H. Duke Shackelford, Wm. Clifford  Smith,
Bismark A. Steinhagen.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 21
                                                                      ----------
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF AMETEK, INC.
 
                                          State of other      Percentage of
                                          jurisdiction of    voting securities
     Name of subsidiary                  incorporation or      owned by its
and name under which it does business      organization      immediate parent*
--------------------------------------     ------------      -----------------
<S>                                     <C>                  <C>  
AmeSpace, Inc............................... Delaware                      100%
 AMETEK Aerospace Products Inc.............. Delaware                      100%
AMETEK (Bermuda) Ltd......................... Bermuda                      100%
AMETEK (Canada) Inc.......................... Canada                       100%
AMETEK Denmark A/S........................... Denmark                      100%
AMETEK (FSC), Inc.....................  U.S. Virgin Islands                100%
AMETEK, G.m.b.H.............................. Germany                      100%
 AMETEK Debro                               
   Messtechnik, G.m.b.H...................... Germany                      100%
AMETEK IMTSA, S.A. de C.V.................... Mexico                       100%
AMETEK (Italia) S.r.l........................  Italy                       100%
AMETEK Lamb Motores de Mexico, S.A.          
 de C.V...................................... Mexico                       100%
AMETEK Mexicana, S.A......................... Mexico                       100%
APIC international S.A....................... France                       100%
 AFIMO S.A.M................................. Monaco                       100%
EMA Corp.................................... Delaware                      100%
 AMETEK Holdings B.V....................... Netherlands                    100%
  Amekai Hong Kong.......................... Hong Kong                      50%
 AMETEK Singapore Private Ltd............... Singapore                     100%
   Amekai Singapore......................... Singapore                      50%
    Amekai Xiamen............................. China                       100%
   Amekai Taiwan............................. Taiwan                        50%
   AMETEK Motors Asia Pte. Ltd.............. Singapore                     100%
 WEBAK B.V................................. Netherlands                    100%
Panalarm Ltd................................. England                      100%
 AMETEK Filters Ltd.......................... England                      100%
</TABLE>
------
* Exclusive of directors' qualifying shares and shares held by nominees as
  required by the laws of the jurisdiction of incorporation.
| 16.26   | Severance      Payment shall mean the payment of a lump sum severance payment, in      cash, equal to the product of 2.99 times the sum of:  (a)      Executive’s annual base salary as in effect at any time within one year      prior to the effective date of the Agreement or, if higher, immediately      prior to a circumstance constituting Good Reason plus (b) the higher of:      (i) the annual incentive award actually awarded to the Executive under the      EAIP for Company’s fiscal year immediately preceding the fiscal year in      which Executive’s Date of Termination occurs;  or (ii) the EAIP      target award for the Executive for Company’s fiscal year in which the      effective date of the Agreement occurs.  Such Severance Payment      shall be made in accordance with the short term deferral exception of Code      Section 409A regulations. |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 16.30 | Target LTIP      Award shall mean the average annual number of performance share      units Executive is entitled to receive under the LTIP with respect to the      two most recent performance periods (as defined in the applicable program      or plan) that precede and do not include the Date of      Termination.  Such average annual number of performance share      units shall be determined by dividing by two the sum of the annual target      pay out levels under the LTIP with respect to such two most recent      performance periods. |
|--------|-------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32(o)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.









|/s/ Michael R. KanslerMichael R. Kansler
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of
System Energy Resources, Inc.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	February 27, 2009
<PAGE>
 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the addition of the financial statement schedule, listed in the
accompanying index to the financial statements covered by our report dated 
February 28, 1997, except for note 1, as to which the date is April 14, 1997, 
included herein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Post Effective Amendment
Number 19 to Registration Statement Number 2-8439 on Form S-3 dated November 10,
1983, Post Effective Amendment Number 1 to Registration Statement Number 33-
18316 on Form S-8 dated December 14, 1987, Registration Statement Number 33-
87992 on Form S-3 dated January 13, 1995 and Post Effective Amendment Number 1
to Registration Statement Number 33-65165 on Form S-3 dated February 2, 1996 and
the Related Prospectuses of our report on the financial statements and schedule
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Atlas Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 1996.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Denver, Colorado
April 14, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 310 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 310

To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure that safety net family 
 planning centers are eligible for assistance under the drug discount 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2009

  Mrs. Boxer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to ensure that safety net family 
 planning centers are eligible for assistance under the drug discount 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Affordable Care for Women Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANDING ACCESS TO DISCOUNT DRUG PRICES FOR SAFETY-NET 
              PROVIDERS.

    (a) Safety-Net Provider Drug Price Discounts.--Section 340B(a)(4) 
of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256b(a)(4)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) through (L) as 
        subparagraphs (E) through (M), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (C), the following:
                    ``(D) An entity that is a public or nonprofit 
                entity that primarily provides a service or services 
                described under section 318A or 1001(a).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              21
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      835
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                         25
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,285
<PP&E>                                           4,773
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,794
<BONDS>                                          1,081
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        499
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,468
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,455
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  34
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     66
<INCOME-TAX>                                        22
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 44
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        44
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED IN THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR
ACCOMPANYING NOTES THERETO.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Elwood Shepard, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  July 23, 2008  /s/ Elwood Shepard Elwood Shepard President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. and will be retained by Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
a T+ -m (O && thdY rudit Brighton Seminole Bingo 

Page 1 of 2 

)' . . . . . . .' , .'* :-. ,,, 
Page 2 of 2
#### SCHWAB et al. v. NATHAN et al.

Civ. 34-1.

District Court, S. D. New York.

May 13, 1948.

See also 8 F.R.D. 228.

Gerald I. McCarthy, of New York City, and Charles Edwin Wallington, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Nathan, Mannheimer, Asche & Winer, of New York City (Norman Winer, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

HULBERT, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves for leave to serve an amended complaint.

The action was commenced on Nov. 22, 1945 and issue was joined by the service of an answer on Jan. 7, 1946. The delay is reasonably accounted for by the death of the attorney of record and the counsel for the plaintiff.

Specifically, the motion is to amend the complaint so as to include therein a second count. No proposed amendment is attached to the motion papers. Counsel who argued the motion for the plaintiff stated that he had not yet been able to prepare the proposed amendment, and defendants contend they were unable to take any other attitude than to object to the amendment upon the ground that they were without any knowledge as to the nature, or details of the amendment.

In my 46 years of practice, I cannot recall any instance in which I have been on one side or the other when an application was made to amend the complaint or answer, that the proposed amendment was not served as a part of the moving papers. However, there is no controlling provision in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in this instance the Court wouia nave *228the right to apply the prevailing section under the New York Civil Practice Act, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Local Rules of this Court,—but there appears to be no controlling provision in that Act or in the Rules of Procedure in the New York State Courts.

However, it was said by Scott, J., in Plitt v. Illinois Surety Co., 165 App.Div. 973, 150 N.Y.S. 756, (1st Dept. 1914): “It is a well-established rule, which in our opinion should not be departed from, that no motion for leave to serve an amended or supplemental pleading should be granted, unless the motion papers include a copy of the pleading which it is desired to serve. The only exception to this rule is when the proposed amendment is purely formal and of a character which does not affect the issues. No such proposed pleading was served in the present case, and the motion for that reason should have been denied.”

Nevertheless, common sense dictates the necessity of having before the Court the proposed amendment. Therefore, the disposition of this motion will be held in abeyance and the plaintiffs’ attorney is herewith required to serve upon the attorneys for the defendant, and file with the Clerk of this Court, with proof of such service, the proposed amendment to the complaint within fifteen days, and an opportunity will be given counsel to be heard in my Chambers on a date, and at an hour to be specified, if the defendants desire such opportunity.