alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 328 

To postpone the DTV transition date. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2009 

Mr. ROCKEFELLER (for himself, Mr. KERRY, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. 

SCHUMER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and considered 

A BILL 

To postpone the DTV transition date. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DTV Delay Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. POSTPONEMENT OF DTV TRANSITION DATE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3002(b) of the Digital 

7 Television Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005 (47 

8 U.S.C. 309 note) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘February 18, 2009;’’ in para10 graph (1) and inserting ‘‘June 13, 2009;’’; and 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘February 18, 2009,’’ in para12 graph (2) and inserting ‘‘that date’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 328 IS 

1 (b) EXTENSION OF COUPON PROGRAM.—Section 

2 3005(c)(1)(A) of that Act (47 U.S.C. 309 note) is amend3 ed by striking ‘‘March 31, 2009,’’ and inserting ‘‘July 31, 

4 2009,’’. 

5 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

6 (1) Section 3008(a)(1) of that Act (47 U.S.C. 

7 309 note) is amended by striking ‘‘February 17, 

8 2009.’’ and inserting ‘‘June 12, 2009.’’. 

9 (2) Section 309(j)(14)(A) of the Communica10 tions Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)(14)(A)) is 

11 amended by striking ‘‘February 17, 2009.’’ and in12 serting ‘‘June 12, 2009.’’. 

13 (3) Section 337(e)(1) of the Communications 

14 Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 337(e)(1)) is amended by 

15 striking ‘‘February 17, 2009,’’ and inserting ‘‘June 

16 12, 2009,’’. 

17 (d) EMERGENCY DESIGNATION.—Each amount made 

18 available under section 3005 of the Digital Television 

19 Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005 (47 U.S.C. 309 

20 note) as a result of the amendments made by this section 

21 is designated as an emergency requirement and necessary 

22 to meet emergency needs pursuant to section 204(a) of 

23 S. Con. Res. 21 (110th Congress) and section 301(b)(2) 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•S 328 IS 

1 of S. Con. Res. 70 (110th Congress), the concurrent reso2 lutions on the budget for fiscal years 2008 and 2009. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2568 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on N-Cyclohexylthiophthalimide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on NCyclohexylthiophthalimide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. N-CYCLOHEXYLTHIOPHTHALIMIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.26 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 N-Cyclohexylthiophthalimide) is amended by striking ‘‘12/ 

7 31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2568 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60151 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JERRY LEE QUINN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:95-CR-83-S-D

- - - - - - - - - - October 17, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jerry Lee Quinn appeals the magistrate judge’s denial of his motion for the return of certain property seized during a search of his residence. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Appellate courts are without jurisdiction to hear appeals directly from federal magistrates. United States v. Renfro , 620 F.2d 497, 500 (5th Cir.), cert.No. 96-60151 - 2 - denied , 449 U.S. 921 (1980). Therefore, Quinn’s appeal of the magistrate judge’s denial of his motion for return of property seized must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32(j)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.





/s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.                   		Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of System Energy Resources, Inc.


Date:  	March 9, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Elwood Shepard, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the ACompany@), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: November 19, 2004

By: /s/ Elwood Shepard

Elwood Shepard

Chief Executive Officer





Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1995
<CASH>                                       2,486,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,493,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,691,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   264,000
<INVENTORY>                                 10,589,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,615,000
<PP&E>                                      30,109,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,840,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,791,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,152,000
<BONDS>                                      8,628,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,001,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,346,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,791,000
<SALES>                                     82,403,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            82,660,000
<CGS>                                       55,289,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               75,439,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             238,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,221,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,490,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,731,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herbert BENAVIDES, a/k/a Erick Gimenez, a/k/a Marbin Yobani Garcia, a/k/a Erick Jimenez, a/k/a Enri Chavez, a/k/a Herberth Benavides, a/k/a Herberth Benavides-Argueta, a/k/a Eduardo Antonio Argueta-Portillo, a/k/a Henry Chavez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-5156.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 15, 2006.

Decided: June 21, 2006.

Michael S. Nachmanoff, Acting Federal Public Defender, Meghan S. Skelton, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Kevin R. Gingras, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Herbert Benavides appeals his thirty-three month prison sentence imposed after his guilty plea to illegal reentry of an aggravated felon in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2) (2000). Finding no error, we affirm.

Benavides claims that his sentence was unreasonable. After *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), a sentencing court is no longer bound by the range prescribed by the sentencing guidelines, but still must calculate and consider the guideline range as well as the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2000). *See United States v. Hughes,*401 F.3d 540, 546 (4th Cir.2005). We will affirm a *post-Booker*sentence if it is both reasonable and within the statutorily prescribed range. *Id.*

The district court properly calculated the sentencing guideline range of thirty-three to forty-one months’ imprisonment. As Benavides’ sentence is within the properly calculated guideline range, it is presumptively reasonable. *United States v. Green,*436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir.2006). Benavides has not rebutted that presump*340tion as the district court appropriately treated the guidelines as advisory, considered the guideline range, and weighed the relevant factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2000).

We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 18(a)
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                                                 
February 13, 1997

System Energy Resources, Inc.
Echelon One
1340 Echelon Parkway
Jackson, Mississippi 39213

Gentlemen:

We  are  providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit
to your Form 10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We   have  read  management's  justification  contained  in   the
Company's Financial Statements which are included in its Form 10-
K  for  the  year  ended December 31, 1996,  for  the  change  in
accounting  principle  from expensing incremental  nuclear  plant
outage  maintenance costs during the operating  period  in  which
they  were  incurred  to capitalizing incremental  nuclear  plant
outage  maintenance  costs as incurred  and  amortizing  them  to
expense  during the operating period between outages.   Based  on
our  reading  of  the data, including documents relating  to  the
Company's  May  1995  filing with the Federal  Energy  Regulatory
Commission  requesting  a  rate increase,  and  discussions  with
Company  officials of the business judgment and business planning
factors   relating   to  the  change,  we  believe   management's
justification to be reasonable.  Accordingly, we concur that  the
newly  adopted accounting principle described above is preferable
in the Company's circumstances to the method previously applied.


Very truly yours,

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          33,870
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                       850
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,892
<PP&E>                                          44,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 186,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,668
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,255
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   186,216
<SALES>                                        620,156
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               620,156
<CGS>                                          486,816
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  486,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                96,313
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   989
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,268
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,535
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,733
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,733
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.00


</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00521

- CR

Lonnie Kendrick Phillips

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 371st District Court

o f Ta rrant County (1269836D )

February 13 , 2014

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judg ment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

_______________________ Justice Bill Meier
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

|   | (1) | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008                (the                “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of                section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 14, 2008 |                                                 |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | **/s/                Frank B. Manning**              |
|                                 | Frank                B. Manning                      |
|                                 | President                and Chief Executive Officer |

----
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                      ASSOCIATES FIRST CAPITAL CORPORATION
 
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
                                             ----------------------------------------------------
                                               1996       1995       1994       1993       1992
                                             --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                          <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Fixed Charges(a)
  Interest expense.........................  $2,456.0   $2,177.9   $1,657.3   $1,421.7   $1,352.1
  Implicit interest in rent................      17.1       13.8       11.7       10.8       10.2
                                             --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
          Total fixed charges..............  $2,473.1   $2,191.7   $1,669.0   $1,432.5   $1,362.3
                                             ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Earnings(b)................................  $1,404.6   $1,198.1   $1,017.4   $  821.3   $  664.6
Fixed Charges..............................   2,473.1    2,191.7    1,669.0    1,432.5    1,362.3
                                             --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
          Earnings, as defined.............  $3,877.7   $3,389.8   $2,686.4   $2,253.8   $2,026.9
                                             ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.........      1.57       1.55       1.61       1.57       1.49
                                             ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
</TABLE>
 
---------------
 
(a) For purposes of such computation, the term "fixed charges" represents
    interest expense and a portion of rentals representative of an implicit
    interest factor for such rentals.
 
(b) For purposes of such computation, the term "earnings" represents earnings
    before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of changes in
    accounting principles, plus fixed charges.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden (Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, March 12, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7979. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Wage & Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden (Notices) Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held                           ( print page 4310)                        Thursday, March 12, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time. For more information, please contact Ms. Sallie Chavez. Please call Ms. Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write Sallie Chavez, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include: Various IRS issues. 

Dated: January 13, 2009. 

Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E9-1333 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P