alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3195 

To prohibit air carriers from charging fees for carry-on baggage and to 

require disclosure of passenger fees, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 12, 2010 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Ms. LANDRIEU) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit air carriers from charging fees for carry-on baggage and to require disclosure of passenger fees, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE OF PASSENGER FEES; PROHIBI4 TION ON FEES FOR CARRY-ON BAGGAGE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Trans7 portation shall complete a rulemaking that— 

8 (1) prohibits each air carrier operating in the 

9 United States under part 121 of title 49, Code of 


srobinson on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3195 IS

1 Federal Regulations, from charging any fees for 

2 carry-on baggage that falls within the restrictions 

3 imposed by the air carrier with respect to the 

4 weight, size, or number of bags; 

5 (2) requires each such air carrier to make de6 tailed information about restrictions with respect to 

7 the weight, size, and number of carry-on baggage 

8 available to passengers before they arrive at the air9 port for a scheduled departure on the air carrier; 

10 and 

11 (3) requires each such air carrier to make avail12 able to the public and to the Secretary a list of all 

13 passenger fees and charges (other than airfare) that 

14 may be imposed by the air carrier, including fees 

15 for— 

16 (A) checked baggage or oversized or heavy 

17 baggage, including specialty items such as bicy18 cles, skis, and firearms; 

19 (B) meals, beverages, or other refresh20 ments; 

21 (C) seats in exit rows, seats with additional 

22 space, or other preferred seats in any given 

23 class of travel; 

24 (D) purchasing tickets from an airline 

25 ticket agent or a travel agency; or 


srobinson on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3195 IS

1 (E) any other good, service, or amenity 

2 provided by the air carrier, as required by the 

3 Secretary. 

4 (b) PUBLICATION; UPDATES.—In order to ensure 

5 that the fee information required by subsection (a)(3) is 

6 both current and widely available to the traveling public, 

7 the Secretary— 

8 (1) may require an air carrier to make such in9 formation available on any public Web site main10 tained by an air carrier, to make such information 

11 available to travel agencies, and to notify passengers 

12 of the availability of such information when adver13 tising airfares; and 

14 (2) shall require air carriers to update the in15 formation as necessary, but no less frequently than 

16 every 90 days unless there has been no increase in 

17 the amount or type of fees shown in the most recent 

18 publication. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 40624 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Roslandy Garcia**

**- Cruz,** 

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 2:18

- CR

- 1113

- 1

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Higginson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roslandy
Garcia

- Cruz has moved to withdraw , has filed brief s per Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011) , and has submitted letters under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(j).

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opin

ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 23, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40624 Document: 00515753171 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2021No. 19

- 40624

2 Garcia

- Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief s , the Rule 28(j) letters , and relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non frivol ous issue for appel late review.
Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is
**D ISMISSED** 

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42

. Case: 19-40624 Document: 00515753171 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/23/2021
**Identify gaming facility(ies):**

**Identify tribal, gaming commission, and/or gaming operation personnel contacted:**

Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2
EX-4.13


  Exhibit 4.13

  Schedule of Holders of Credit Agreement Warrants to Purchase Stock

  			
	Name of Warrant Holder
	Number of Shares Subject to Warrant
	Expiration Date

	Warberg WF X, LP
	54,793
	June 23, 2027

	Warberg WF X, LP
	49,314
	October 16, 2028

	Warberg WF X, LP
	49,314
	October 7, 2029

	Perceptive Credit Holdings III, LP
	150,684
	August 23, 2031
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

137170 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PRIME FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 137170 

 COA: 273264 

Kent CC: 01-010952-CK 

CASEY VINTON,

Defendant, 

and 

BANK ONE, NA,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.









|/s/ J. Wayne LeonardJ. Wayne Leonard
Chief Executive Officer of Entergy Corporation
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:	March 9, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth McMaster, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 923]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Mc-Keighan, J.), rendered June 22, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree and, under the terms of the plea agreement, was sentenced as a second felony offender to *l1/2*to 3 years in prison, that sentence to run consecutively with the sentence he was then serving. He now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, which reflects that defendant received the minimum permissible sentence, as well as counsel’s brief and defendant’s letter submission, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel’s request for leave to withdraw is granted *(see People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979 [1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 650 [1986]; *see generally People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Stein, J.E, McCarthy, Spain and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
Exhibit 12(a)Entergy Arkansas, Inc.Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges andRatios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends2001
2002
2003
2004
2005Fixed charges, as defined:Total Interest Charges
$109,523
$103,210
$91,221
$84,430
$84,992Interest applicable to rentals
14,563
12,762
15,425
13,171
13,911Total fixed charges, as defined
124,086
115,972
106,646
97,601
98,903Preferred dividends, as defined (a)
12,348
11,869
14,274
12,646
12,093Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined
$136,434
$127,841
$120,920
$110,247
$110,996Earnings as defined:Net Income
$178,185
$135,643
$126,009
$142,210
$174,635Add:Provision for income taxes:Total
105,933
71,404
105,296
89,064
96,949Fixed charges as above
124,086
115,972
106,646
97,601
98,903Total earnings, as defined
$408,204
$323,019
$337,951
$328,875
$370,487Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined
3.29
2.79
3.17
3.37
3.75Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges andpreferred dividends, as defined
2.99
2.53
2.79
2.98
3.34------------------------(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by dividing the preferred dividend
      requirement by one hundred percent (100%) minus the income tax rate.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13556]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Initial Review 
Group, (NCIPC IRG)

    Times and Dates:

12:30 p.m.-7 p.m., June 22, 2009 (Closed).
9 a.m.-5 p.m., June 23, 2009 (Closed).
9 a.m.-5 p.m., June 24, 2009 (Closed).
9 a.m.-5 p.m., June 25, 2009 (Closed).

    Correction: This notice was published in the Federal Register on 
May 19, 2009, Volume 74, Number 95, Page 23423. The timeframe for the 
closed portion of the meeting was published incorrectly.
    Contact Person For More Information: Rick Waxweiler, Ph.D., 
Director, Extramural Research Program Office, NCIPC and Executive 
Secretary, NCIPC IRG, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., M/S F-62, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30341, Telephone (770) 488-4850.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for 
both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: June 3, 2009.
Lorenzo Falgiano,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-13556 Filed 6-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 dated October 14, 1988 and Form S-8 dated December 28, 1994)
pertaining to the 1988 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the 1994 Incentive Stock
Option Plan of K2 Inc. of our report dated February 21, 2000, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of K2 Inc. included in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 dated August
9, 1999) of K2 Inc. and in the related Proxy Statement of our report dated
February 21, 2000 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of K2
Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1999.

Our audits also include the financial statement schedule of K2 Inc. listed in
Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the
financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.

                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 24, 2000
Exhibit 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form  S-8  No.   33-52125)   pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.   Deferred
Compensation  and Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee  Directors,  in the
Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  2-95022)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc.  Amended Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees,  in the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-32612)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Employee
Savings  Plan,  in the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  33-26101)
pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.   Long-Term   Incentive   Plan,  in  the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.  33-55922)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc. 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-49907) pertaining to the Ashland Inc. Leveraged Employee Stock Ownership
Plan, in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-62901)  pertaining to
the Ashland Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, in the Registration  Statement
(Form  S-8  No.  333-33617)  pertaining  to the  Ashland  Inc.  1997  Stock
Incentive  Plan, in the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-3 No.  333-78675)
pertaining  to the  registration  of 68,925  shares of Ashland Inc.  Common
Stock, in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-36842) pertaining to
the  registration  of 96,600 shares of Ashland Inc.  Common  Stock,  in the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-54762)   pertaining  to  the
registration  of  149,300  shares of  Ashland  Inc.  Common  Stock,  in the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-82830)   pertaining  to  the
registration of 265,100 shares and in the Registration  Statement (Form S-3
No.  333-69138)   pertaining  to  the  offering  of  $600,000,000  of  Debt
Securities,   Preferred  Stock,  Depository  Shares,  Common  Stock  and/or
Warrants  of Ashland  Inc.,  of our report  dated  November  6, 2002,  with
respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of Ashland
Inc. and  consolidated  subsidiaries  included in this Annual  Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2002.





Cincinnati, Ohio
November 26, 2002
# Patent

## Title
Assembly for preparing hot and frothed milk

## Abstract

A baking equipment has an oven to bake an article which was dipped in a resin, a sealing box, and a plurality of heating devices and a turning structure disposed in the sealing box. The turning structure has a pair of transporting devices and a pair of air-cushioning devices disposed in the transporting devices.

## Background
The present invention relates to a turning structure of a baking equipment. More particularly, the present invention relates to a turning structure which has a pair of transporting devices and a pair of air-cushioning devices.

Referring to FIG. 1, a conventional baking equipment has an oven B to bake an article A which was dipped in a resin, a pair of air-pressuring boxes E, a cooling device C, a sealing box F, and a plurality of transporting devices D. When the article A passes through the transporting devices D, the surface of the article A will be damaged while the article contacts one of the transporting devices D. Therefore, the cooling device C is required to decrease a surface temperature of the article A. However, the producing efficiency and the energy efficiency are decreased significantly.

An object of the present invention is to provide a turning structure which has a pair of transporting devices and a pair of air-cushioning devices disposed in the transporting devices in order to provide an air-cushioning function for an article.

Accordingly, a baking equipment comprises an oven to bake an article, a sealing box, and a plurality of heating devices and a turning structure disposed in the sealing box. The turning structure has a pair of transporting devices and a pair of air-cushioning devices disposed in the transporting devices.

FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a conventional baking equipment of the prior art; and

FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a baking equipment of a preferred embodiment in accordance with the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 2, a baking equipment comprises an oven 1 to bake an article 4 which was dipped in a resin, a sealing box 3, and a plurality of heating devices 30 and a turning structure disposed in the sealing box 3.

The turning structure has a pair of transporting devices 2 and a pair of air-cushioning devices 20 disposed in the transporting devices 2.

The air-cushioning devices 20 produce high-pressure air to blow the article A in order to provide an air-cushioning function for the article A so that the article A will not contact the transporting devices 2.

Therefore, the surface temperature of the article A need not be decreased. Thus the producing efficiency and the energy efficiency are increased significantly.

The present invention is not limited to the above embodiment but various modification thereof may be made. Furthermore, various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.

## Claims

1. A baking equipment comprising an oven to bake an article, a sealing box, and a plurality of heating devices and a turning structure disposed in the sealing box, characterized in that: air-cushioning devices disposed in the transporting devices, and
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sergio Rodriguez, Appellant.

Submitted March 7, 2011;

decided March 24, 2011

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 15, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131844 & (27)(28) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

SHERMAN TOWNSHIP,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131844 

 COA: 269020 

St. Joseph CC: 03-001068-CZ

JOSEPH A. LEEMREIS AND 

LORI M. LEEMREIS,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the June 29, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to stay the trial court proceedings is 

DENIED. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

p1108 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 15, 2006 

 Clerk
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2636 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain stage lights of aluminum. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain stage lights 

of aluminum. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN STAGE LIGHTS OF ALUMINUM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2636 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Fresnel lanterns, ellipsoidal 

reflector spotlights or floodlights, parabolic aluminized 

reflector lights, cyclorama, 

strip lights, scoop lights or 

followspots, the foregoing of 

aluminum, suitable for use as 

theatrical lighting and designed to be affixed to or installed in walls, ceilings, supporting beams or frameworks 

or theater stages (provided 

for in subheading 

9405.40.60) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
August 22,2013 

Tracie Stevens, Chairperson 

Daniel Little, Associate Commissioner 

National lndian Gaming Commission 

1441 L. St., N.W., Suite 9100 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Dear Chairperson Stevens and Commissioner Little, 

After reading everything I have at my disposal regarding Class II/III game classification, I believe that the 

distinction between Class II and Class Ill has been already been argued in court and defined under the 

three legal requirements identified (as well as the maximum flexibilitv given to tribes to take advantage 

of technological advances in the design of Class II games). I see no basis to overturn their previous 

decision and'classify Class II gaming as Class Ill gaming. In the State of Montana this could possibly open 

up the door for the State to seek to require the Montana lndian tribes engaged in gaming operations; to 

pay a cut of gaming revenue generated by the Fort Belknap lndian Community to the State. The State of 

Montana by way of gaming compacts with each Montana lndian tribe, regulates Class Ill gaming. The 

NlGC regulates Class II gaming in lndian Country. If all Class II gaming was reclassified as Class Ill gaming, 

wouldn't control of lndian gaming revert to the control of the State of Montana? Gaming compacts 

between the tribes and states would be under attack by the states for financial gain. 

The one-touch feature in electronic gaming machines is merely a technological advance in the game of 

bingo, it does not alter the manner in which the basic game of bingo is played. It merely speeds up the 

game, initiating a game of bingo, covering the numbers called for the player during a game of bingo and 

deciding if the player has a win. No need to push the button to start the game and push the button a 

second time to cover the numbers that have been electronically called for the game if the software for 

the game can do it for the player. The main gaming classification determination is whether or not the 

player is playing solely against the game machine by themselves or are they playing against other 

players via each players game, playing for the one prize. I believe that the distinction between Class II 

and Class Ill gaming has already been litigated, defined and should stand in the manner which clearly 

differentiates Class II from Class Ill gaming. The tribes depend upon this Class II gaming classification 

distinction as a means of generating revenue. In doing so, improving the economies of their reservations 

without fear of intrusion from outside entities who would like to rewrite laws/compacts to benefit from 

lndian gaming when it is not their right to do so. Tribal sovereignty and economic improvement is critical 

to our people here at the Fort Belknap lndian Community. 

Robert H. Williams, Jr. 

General Manger 

Fort Belknap Casino, Inc. 

104 Assiniboine Ave. 

P.O. Box 308 

Harlem, MT 59526