alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3259 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3259

 To amend subtitle A of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and 
  Reform Act of 2004 to make the operation of such subtitle permanent 
                                  law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2010

    Mr. Kohl (for himself, Mr. Leahy, and Mr. Hatch) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend subtitle A of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and 
  Reform Act of 2004 to make the operation of such subtitle permanent 
                                  law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Antitrust Criminal Penalties 
Enforcement and Reform Act of 2004 Extension Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF SUNSET.

    The Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and Reform Act of 2004 
(15 U.S.C. 1 note) is amended by striking section 211.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect immediately 
before June 22, 2010.

SEC. 4. GAO REPORT.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Comptroller General shall submit a report to the Committees on the 
Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Senate on the 
effectiveness of the Antitrust Criminal Penalties Enforcement and 
Reform Act of 2004, both in criminal investigation and enforcement by 
the Department of Justice and in private civil actions. Such report 
shall consider, inter alia, the effectiveness of incentives for 
cooperation, and the timeliness of that cooperation, in private civil 
actions.
                                 <all>
```
#### AMERICAN CHICLE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. JOINT COUNCIL 16, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, A. F. of L., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Feb. 25, 1955.

Spiro, Felstiner & Prager, New York City, for plaintiff.

Howard Schulman, New York City, for defendant Local 819.

Boudin, Cohn & Glickstein, New York City, for defendant Local 807.

Nicholas S. Falcone, New York City, for defendant Local 707.

KNOX, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff’s service of a demand for a jury trial was timely as respects twenty-six of the twenty-nine of the defendants named in the amended complaint. The demand was not timely as to the three original defendants.

Nevertheless, the causes of action set forth in the complaint are substantially the same, and I see no good reason why this Court should be burdened by two trials, one before a judge and the other before a judge and jury. In deference to the desirability of saving time, effort and money, and, in consideration of the rights of other litigants, I shall exercise my discretion and hold that plaintiff may have a jury trial as to all defendants.
#### Judith Klein, Appellant, v New York City Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

Submitted March 26, 2012;

decided June 26, 2012

Motion for reargument etc. denied *[see*18 NY3d 806 (2012)].
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          31,882
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,010
<INVENTORY>                                      1,345
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,602
<PP&E>                                         848,564
<DEPRECIATION>                                 355,039
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 585,941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,832
<BONDS>                                        374,093
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,328
<OTHER-SE>                                     105,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   585,941
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,008
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,654)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,425)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,229)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,229)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of EnerJex Resources, Inc.

As of December 31, 2010



|                        |  |                        |  |                     
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | --------------------
|Name of Subsidiary      |  | State of Incorporation |  | Percentage Ownership
|DD Energy, Inc.         |  | Nevada                 |  | 100%                
|EnerJex Kansas, Inc.    |  | Nevada                 |  | 100%                
|Black Sable Energy, LLC |  | Texas                  |  | 100%                
|Working Interest, LLC   |  | Kansas                 |  | 100%
#### Frank Cervera, Appellant, v Rossanna Bressler, Respondent.

Decided May 1, 2012

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Elwood Shepard, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the ACompany@), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: May 17, 2004

By: /s/ Elwood Shepard

Elwood Shepard

Chief Executive Officer





Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership - VI A (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual        General Partner and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the Partnership.

      May 15, 2009     /s/ Joseph M. Jayson      

           Date             Joseph M. Jayson,

                               Individual General Partner and

                               Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 12(g)System Energy Resources, Inc.Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges andRatios of Earnings to Fixed Charges2001
2002
2003
2004
2005Fixed charges, as defined:Total Interest
$138,018
$76,639
$64,620
$58,928
$60,424Interest applicable to rentals
4,458
3,250
3,793
3,426
3,039Total fixed charges, as defined
$142,476
$79,889
$68,413
$62,354
$63,463Earnings as defined:Net Income
$116,355
$103,352
$106,003
$105,948
$111,644Add:Provision for income taxes:Total
43,761
76,177
75,845
78,013
69,343Fixed charges as above
142,476
79,889
68,413
62,354
63,463Total earnings, as defined
$302,592
$259,418
$250,261
$246,315
$244,450Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined
2.12
3.25
3.66
3.95
3.85
Exhibit 12(d)Entergy Mississippi, Inc.Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges andRatios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends2003
2004
2005
2006
2007Fixed charges, as defined:Total Interest
$47,464
$44,637
$43,707
$51,216
$47,020Interest applicable to rentals
1,880
1,162
771
1,427
1,577Total fixed charges, as defined
$49,344
$45,799
$44,478
$52,643
$48,597Preferred dividends, as defined (a)
5,099
5,067
5,129
4,373
4,144Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined
$54,443
$50,866
$49,607
$57,016
$52,741Earnings as defined:Net Income
$67,058
$73,497
$62,103
$52,285
$72,106Add:Provision for income taxes:Total income taxes
34,431
37,040
33,952
28,567
35,850Fixed charges as above
49,344
45,799
44,478
52,643
48,597Total earnings, as defined
$150,833
$156,336
$140,533
$133,495
$156,553Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined
3.06
3.41
3.16
2.54
3.22Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges andpreferred dividends, as defined
2.77
3.07
2.83
2.34
2.97------------------------(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-K, are computed by dividing the preferred dividendrequirement by one hundred percent (100%) minus the income tax rate.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JOSE RAMON CRUZ-GAMEZ, AKA 

Brian Colindre-Hernandez, AKA Jose Cruz, 

AKA Jose Ramon Cruz Martinez, AKA Jose 

Martinez Cruz, AKA Normin Ricardo 

Ramos-Calis, AKA Normin Ricardo RamosCallis, AKA Carlos Torres-Hernandez, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-10335 

D.C. No. 3:19-cr-00196-WHA-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 8, 2020**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Jose Ramon Cruz-Gamez appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 63-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 16 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-10335 

possession of fentanyl with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 

§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Cruz-Gamez contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The 

government argues that this claim is covered by the appeal waiver in the parties’ 

plea agreement. We decline to enforce the waiver, and instead affirm on the 

merits. See United States v. Jacobo Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 956-57 (9th Cir. 2007) 

(en banc) (appeal waiver is not a jurisdictional bar). Contrary to Cruz-Gamez’s 

argument, the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the 63-month

sentence, which was at the bottom of the uncontested Guidelines range. See Gall 

v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable 

in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the 

circumstances, including the failure of Cruz-Gamez’s previous sentences to deter 

him. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. 

Cruz-Gamez also asks us to remand for resentencing in light of COVID-19. 

However, we have no authority to vacate a sentence that is procedurally sound and 

substantively reasonable.1 See United States v. Rangel, 697 F.3d 795, 800 (9th Cir. 

1 Cruz-Gamez acknowledges that he is not alleging any procedural defects in the 

sentence. His reliance on United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2005) 

(en banc), to argue that this court can remand for the district court to reconsider his 

sentence even absent any procedural or substantive error, is misplaced. The 

holding in Ameline was predicated on the substantial change in sentencing law 
3 19-10335 

2012). This disposition is without prejudice to any right Cruz-Gamez may have to 

seek compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). 

AFFIRMED.

announced by the Supreme Court in United State v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). 

Cruz-Gamez points to no such legal change here.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership
     VI-A for the six months ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its
     entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             31,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         764,657
<PP&E>                                                20,416,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                         6,146,248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        15,740,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  1,616,428
<BONDS>                                               11,350,099
<COMMON>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          15,740,649
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       2,058,113
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          2,724,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       519,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (666,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (666,583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (4.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        

</TABLE>
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Presidential Documents 26931 

Proclamation 8388 of June 1, 2009 

Great Outdoors Month, 2009 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

The United States is blessed with unparalleled natural beauty. From remote 

forests to urban parks, these spaces have inspired visitors for generations. 

Today, these areas continue to raise the human spirit in those who experience 

them. During the month of June, I encourage Americans to pay tribute 

to and preserve the great outdoors. 

Americans of all ages can find calm and enjoyment in our Nation’s vast 

outdoors. Those desiring quiet or solitude can explore one of our many 

National Parks, which offer tranquil and pristine surroundings. Those seeking 

recreation can also explore public lands, or they can simply run, bicycle, 

or fish in areas close to their homes. Whether near or far, the outdoors 

offers unique experiences. 

Exploring the great outdoors can also help improve one’s health. These 

spaces provide countless venues for walking, hiking, running, swimming, 

and boating, among other activities. Americans can combine the enjoyment 

of being outside with the exercise we all need to stay healthy. 

My Administration is working to connect America’s youth with our treasured 

landscapes, which should be viewed as classrooms for environmental education and gateways to careers in natural resources. These efforts will include 

outreach to those who typically lack representation in, and exposure to, 

these fields. The Department of the Interior is launching a summer mentoring 

initiative as part of this effort. This program invites families and friends 

to teach children about the joys and wonders of the outdoors. My Administration is also increasing the number of youth involved in national service 

on public lands. Through AmeriCorps and other programs and partnerships, 

we can continue our Nation’s proud tradition of service and respect for 

the environment. 

Americans are fortunate to have so many beautiful natural wonders and 

open spaces. I encourage all in our Nation to enjoy these resources and 

to help protect them for future generations. Together, we can carry forward 

our Nation’s proud tradition of admiration and preservation of the great 

outdoors. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2009 as Great 

Outdoors Month. I encourage all Americans to spend more time outside 

and to participate in the nationwide events marking this occasion. 

26932 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this first day of 

June, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third. 

[FR Doc. E9–13283 

Filed 6–3–09; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


OB#1.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 12.1

                         ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
                    Computation of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                    ($000's)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       2002         2001         2000         1999         1998
                                                    ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                                 <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Income From Continuing Operations                   $  199,343   $  280,688   $  306,594   $  268,322   $  255,247
Income Taxes                                           126,805      183,136      195,665      133,015      133,452
Fixed Charges                                          168,985      166,939      179,381      179,088      183,398
                                                    ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
    Total                                           $  495,133      630,763      681,640      580,425      572,097

Fixed Charges:
    Interest Charges                                   133,878      130,525      141,886      140,948      144,695
    Amortization of Debt Discount                        2,888        2,650        2,105        2,084        2,410
    Estimated Interest Portion of Annual Rents          32,219       33,764       35,390       36,056       36,293
                                                    ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
        Total Fixed Charges                            168,985      166,939      179,381      179,088      183,398

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (rounded down)         2.93         3.77         3.79         3.24         3.11
                                                    ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>
97-328.

#### State ex rel. GTE N., Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm.

In Mandamus. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Resnick, J., not participating.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0511

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRADLEY ALAN STOKES,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursu ant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Randal I. Spaulding , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 4 2023

10/04/2023
Case Number: DA 21-0511