alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(k)

CERTIFICATIONS

** 
I, Roderick K. West, certify that:  
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Entergy New Orleans, Inc.;  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:   
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   
b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;   
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

		/s/ Roderick K. West			

**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Entergy
Louisiana's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000060527
<NAME> ENTERGY LOUISIANA, INC.
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER> 012
   <NAME> ENTERGY LOUISIANA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,280,721
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    136,606
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         333,075
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       334,248
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,084,650
<COMMON>                                     1,088,900
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       (2,171)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             59,554
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,146,283
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          105,000
<PREFERRED>                                    100,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,145,463
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  116,388
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     23,543
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                28,387
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,419,086
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,084,650
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,806,594
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           122,368
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,386,452
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,386,452
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        420,142
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               7,131
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 427,273
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       113,135
<NET-INCOME>                                   191,770
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      9,955
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  181,815
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       197,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      144,731
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         410,394
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
PAY.GOV: E-PAYMENT PROCESS INSTRUCTIONS

1. Enter the payment system via their website at www.pay.gov and click on the “Find an Agency” 

tab. After click on the “Find an Agency” tab, click on the letter “N” to select “National Indian Gaming 

Commission” from the list. Click on “Continue” and “Continue to the Form” to reach the NIGC 

Sample Quarterly Fee Worksheet. 

2. The National Indian Gaming Commission Fee Worksheet is a PUBLIC FORM. Public forms are 

freely available to everyone. It is not necessary to self-enroll to make a payment using a public 

form. However, by self-enrolling with Pay.gov, the user can duplicate a previously submitted form by 

clicking the link titled “Duplicate” under their submitted forms list. If you would like to have a record of 

the payments you submit online, you should register and create an account.

3. Enter the information as indicated. Certain fields are mandatory and the form will not process if 

you do not provide complete and correct information; some fields have a drop box option such as for 

Fiscal Year-End and Payment Due Dates; some fields have a built-in formula to perform the 

necessary calculation. If a field requires a numerical response, you must place a zero (0) in the field 

in order to continue. The form will not allow you to continue if a field is blank.

4. The form calls for an NIGC-ID number. This number can be found on your quarterly fee 

statements. If you are not sure what your NIGC-ID is, please contact us.

5. PLEASE BE SURE YOU HAVE THE CORRECT FISCAL YEAR AND PAYMENT DUE DATE 

ON YOUR FORM. You need to select the Fiscal Year-End first in order to be able to select the 

Payment Due Date from the drop down list. The current Tier Two Rate can be obtained from 

WWW.NIGC.GOV. 

6. Once you complete the form, select the continue option; it will take you to the next page for the 

payment process. You need to provide your bank information as requested.

7. If you have questions related to the form, please send your questions 

to fee_questions@nigc.gov. If you have payment related questions, please contact pay.gov 

Customer Service by phone at (800) 624-1373 or by email at pay.gov.clev@clev.frb.org.

NIGC Contacts: Your NIGC Regional Office or Wei Zhong in the Division of Finance by email at 

fee_questions@nigc.gov or by phone at (202) 632-7003.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 17, 2017

s0214 

# Order

Clerk February 17, 2017

155148

SC: 155148

In re DENG, Minors. COA: 333365

Kent CC Family Division:

14

- 053706

- NA; 14

- 053707

- NA;

14

- 053708

- NA; 14

- 053709

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 24**

 

 

February 26, 2009

 

 

TO:		        Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.              		Robert D. Sloan

Re:          		Power of Attorney - 2008 Form 10-K

 

Entergy Corporation, referred to herein as the Company, will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Company and the undersigned persons, in their respective capacities as directors and/or officers of the Company, as specified in Attachment I, do each hereby make, constitute and appoint Theodore H. Bunting, Jr and Robert D. Sloan and each of them, their true and lawful Attorneys (with full power of substitution) for each of the undersigned and in his or her name, place and stead to sign and cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the aforementioned Annual Report on Form 10-K and any amendments thereto.

Yours very truly,

ENTERGY CORPORATION

 

 

 

By: /s/ J. Wayne Leonard                                 J. Wayne Leonard	     Chairman of the Board, Director      and Chief Executive Officer
```
      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit





No. 97-2214

                          UNITED STATES,

                            Appellee,

                                v.

                     MARIO HERNANDEZ-MORENO,

                      Defendant, Appellant.



           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                 FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

        [Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]



                              Before

                     Torruella, Chief Judge,
               Boudin and Lipez, Circuit Judges. 
                                
                                
 

     Joseph C. Laws, Jr., Federal Public Defender, and Laura
Maldonado Rodriguez, Assistant Federal Public Defender, on brief
for appellant.
     Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Jose A. Quiles-
Espinosa, Senior Litigation Counsel, and Camille Velez-Rive,
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.    





September 22, 1998



                                
  Per Curiam.  Upon careful consideration of the briefs and
record presented for this appeal, we conclude that the sentence
imposed upon revocation of supervised release was within the
district court's authority under 18 U.S.C. � 3583(e)(3) and was not
inconsistent with U.S.S.G. � 7B1.4.  See United States v. O'Neil,
11 F.3d 292, 301 n.11 (1st Cir. 1993).  In our view, the district
court's stated reasons for the 18-month prison term were entirely
conventional, aimed at protecting society from a defendant in need
of substance abuse treatment, and raised no issue within the plain
thrust of 28 U.S.C. � 944(k).
  Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.














                               -2-
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. ER06-615-000; ER07-1257-000; ER08-1113-000; ER08-1178-000; ER09-241-000]

                    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives notice that on the following dates members of its staff will participate in teleconferences and meetings to be conducted by the California Independent System Operator (CAISO). The agenda and other documents for the teleconferences and meetings are available on the CAISO's Web site,                    *http://www.caiso.com.*

June 1, 2009 Market Simulation Review.

June 2, 2009 Systems Interface User Group.

Market Simulation Checkpoint.

June 3, 2009 Settlements and Market Clearing User Group. Congestion Revenue Rights.

June 4, 2009 Market Simulation Checkpoint.

June 9, 2009 Systems Interface User Group. Market Simulation Checkpoint.

June 10, 2009 Settlements and Market Clearing User Group. Congestion Revenue Rights.

June 11, 2009 Market Simulation Checkpoint.

June 16, 2009 Systems Interface User Group.

                    Sponsored by the CAISO, the teleconferences and meetings are open to all market participants, and                           ( print page 27141)                        Commission staff's attendance is part of the Commission's ongoing outreach efforts. The teleconferences and meetings may discuss matters at issue in the above captioned dockets.                

                    For further information, contact Saeed Farrokhpay at                     *saeed.farrokhpay@ferc.gov;*                     (916) 294-0322 or Maury Kruth at                     *maury.kruth@ferc.gov,*                     (916) 294-0275.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9-13224 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel Enrique MORENO-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40276.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Manuel Enrique Moreno-Gomez, McRae, GA, pro se.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Enrique Moreno-Gomez on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Moreno-Gomez has filed a response.

Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Moreno-Gomez’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - VI B (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General
Partner and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Partnership.


              November 15, 2004                 /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
              -----------------                 --------------------
                    Date                        Joseph M. Jayson,
                                                Individual General Partner and
                                                Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ARAMARK Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Frederick Sutherland, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 15, 2009



/s/    L. FREDERICK
SUTHERLANDL. Frederick Sutherland Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Legend
Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 1998 and 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such September 30, 1998 Quarterly Report filed on Form 10-Q and 1997 Annual
Report filed on Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      19,614,628
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,656,912
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                113,615,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      31,020,367
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,227,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             164,859,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     59,313,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,117
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,326,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               164,859,239
<SALES>                                     26,755,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,431,048
<CGS>                                       18,410,807
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               37,744,293
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,598,030
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,229,201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,911,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,911,277)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,911,277)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.58)
        

</TABLE>
#### Henry C. HIGGINS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Respondent.

No. 05-3263.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 14, 2006.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 31, 2006.

Before NEWMAN, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: *AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 31, 2015

NO. 03-15-00121-CR

Tom Benson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 7 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed the 

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the trial

court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and remands the case 

for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Appellee shall pay all costs relating to this 

appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
**Local Dispatch**

**For the National Preparedness Review, you will need to have the following items available for review:**

**ADMINISTRATIVE**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**INITIAL ATTACK**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**AIRCRAFT AND AVIATION MANAGEMENT**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**INTELLIGENCE**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

****

**EXPANDED DISPATCH/INCIDENT BUSINESS MANAGEMENT**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**QUALIFICATONS AND TRAINING**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

Checklist #9 - Local Dispatch Center	13	Revised June 2021

# image1.png
***NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION***

***MICS AUDIT CHECKLIST***

***CREDIT (CR)***

Page 8 of 9