alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick Devone WALKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-6210.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 2006.

Decided: June 29, 2006.

Patrick Devone Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Devone Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(b) motion as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and denying it as a successive motion for which authorization had not been granted. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Walker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
97-14.

#### J.A. Croson Co. v. J.A. Guy, Inc.

Pickaway App. No. 95CA10. On motion to modify the court’s entry stating the issue to be briefed. Motion denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27354-27355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13463]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,851]


Precise Engineering, Lowell, MI; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on April 27, 2009, in response 
to a petition filed by a Michigan One-Stop Operator on behalf

[[Page 27355]]

of workers of Precise Engineering, Lowell, Michigan.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 1st day of May, 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13463 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3109 

To require the Secretary of the Army to conduct levee system evaluations 

and certifications on receipt of requests from non-Federal interests. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2010 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Army to conduct levee system 

evaluations and certifications on receipt of requests from 

non-Federal interests. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Community 

5 Flood Protection Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RURAL COMMUNITY FLOOD PROTECTION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—On receipt of a request from a 

8 non-Federal interest, the Secretary of the Army (referred 

9 to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall conduct a levee 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3109 IS

1 system evaluation and certification of a federally author2 ized levee or a non-federally authorized levee for purposes 

3 of the National Flood Insurance Program established 

4 under chapter 1 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 

5 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4011 et seq.). 

6 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—A levee system evaluation and 

7 certification under subsection (a) shall— 

8 (1) at a minimum, comply with the require9 ments of section 65.10 of title 44, Code of Federal 

10 Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment 

11 of this Act); and 

12 (2) be carried out in accordance with such pro13 cedures as the Secretary, in consultation with the 

14 Director of the Federal Emergency Management 

15 Agency, may establish. 

16 (c) COST SHARING.— 

17 (1) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—Subject to para18 graph (2), the non-Federal share of the cost of car19 rying out a levee system evaluation and certification 

20 under this section shall be 35 percent. 

21 (2) ADJUSTMENT.—The Secretary shall adjust 

22 the non-Federal share under paragraph (1) to zero 

23 if— 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3109 IS

1 (A) the non-Federal interest is located in 

2 an area with a population of 10,000 or fewer 

3 individuals; or 

4 (B) the division of the non-Federal interest 

5 with responsibility for the applicable levee is 

6 staffed by individuals operating on a volunteer 

7 basis. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<LEGEND>         The schedule contains summary financial information
                 extracted from the consolidated balance sheets and
                 consolidated statements of operations and is qualified in
                 its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                     46,675
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                              66,758
<ALLOWANCES>                                5,051
<INVENTORY>                                 1,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          152,096
<PP&E>                                     35,611
<DEPRECIATION>                             24,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            357,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     208,914
<BONDS>                                   117,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                      185
<OTHER-SE>                                 30,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              357,240
<SALES>                                   231,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          231,186
<CGS>                                     203,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             238,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              388
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          4,339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (12,477)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  451
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (12,928)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                             (12,928)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.07)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Elwood Shepard, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the ACompany@), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: November 8, 2005

By: /s/ Elwood Shepard

Elwood Shepard

Chief Executive Officer



Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Jemal Albritton, Appellant, v Brian Fisher, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Submitted April 22, 2013;

decided June 4, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
- 931 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

303 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. McGINN

Cite as 303 Neb. 931

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. 

Danny J. McGinn, appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed August 23, 2019. No. S-18-744.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Holt County, Mark D. 

Kozisek, Judge, on appeal thereto from the County Court for 

Holt County, Kale B. Burdick, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.

Forrest F. Peetz, of Peetz Law, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Nathan A. Liss, 

for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller‐Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the 

appellee, State of Nebraska, concerning our opinion in State v. 

McGinn.

1

 We overrule the motion, but we modify the opinion 

as follows:

In the analysis section, we withdraw the last paragraph2 and 

substitute the following:

1 State v. McGinn, ante p. 224, 928 N.W.2d 391 (2019).

2 Id. at 234, 928 N.W.2d at 398.

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

11/01/2019 01:05 AM CDT
- 932 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

303 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. McGINN

Cite as 303 Neb. 931

In this matter, because we consider all evidence admitted by the trial court, erroneously or not, we consider the 

breath test in our double jeopardy analysis. Considering 

the breath test, the evidence was sufficient to sustain 

a guilty verdict for a violation of § 60-6,196(1)(c) as 

charged. As such, double jeopardy does not forbid a 

remand for a new trial. Therefore, in consideration of 

all of the above, we reverse the district court’s decision 

affirming the county court’s conviction and remand the 

cause to the district court with directions to remand the 

matter to the county court for a new trial.

In the sole paragraph of the conclusion section, we withdraw 

the last sentence3 and substitute the following: “Accordingly, 

we reverse the district court’s decision affirming the county 

court’s conviction, but determine double jeopardy does not 

require dismissal of this action.”

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

 Former opinion modified. 

 Motion for rehearing overruled.

3 Id.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 112 (Friday, June 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 28051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13760]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Extramural Associates Research 
Development Award (EARDA).
    Date: July 9, 2009.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Carla T. Walls, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health, and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6898, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0d7c1ccccd3c3e0cdc1c9cc8ecec9c88ec7cfd6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d6a7c71716e7e5d707c747133737475337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 5, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-13760 Filed 6-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Elwood Shepard, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Heavenly Hot Dogs, Inc. (the ACompany@), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  c) presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and   Date: November 8, 2006 By: /s/ Elwood Shepard Elwood Shepard Chief Executive Officer  Chief Financial Officer
Biography

National Indian Gaming Commission

DEPUTY ASSISTANT CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER

RAYMOND CAMPBELL

Raymond Campbell is the Deputy Assistant Chief Compliance Officer at the 

National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC). As the Deputy Assistant, he will 

monitor compliance of tribal gaming operations in accordance with the Indian 

Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), NIGC Regulations and Commission directives.

Campbell joined NIGC as Deputy Assistant in March 2023. Campbell spent the 

previous 6 years with NIGC as a Compliance Officer in the NIGC’s Oklahoma City 

Region. He has assisted NIGC ensuring tribal compliance with IGRA and by 

providing technical assistance and training to numerous tribes and tribal gaming 

regulatory authorities. Prior to NIGC, Campbell worked as an attorney representing 

tribal clients in the areas of tribal sovereignty, governance and gaming.

Campbell is a graduate of Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State 

University where he received Juris Doctor certificates in both the Indian Law and 

Law, Science and Technology programs. He also earned a Bachelor of Science 

degree in Biochemistry from the University of Oklahoma.

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act created the National Indian Gaming Commission to support tribal self-sufficiency and the integrity of Indian gaming. 

NIGC oversees the efficient regulation of 520 gaming establishments operated by 243 tribes across 29 states.

Updated 3/14/2023
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of  Dominix,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 23, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Raymond
Barton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

            (1)   The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Raymond Barton
----------------------------
Raymond Barton
Chief Executive Officer
August 23, 2004


A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

VCC, LLC; ALL STAR STEEL, LLC; 

MARTIN IRON WORKS, INC.; 

TANDEM INDUSTRIES, LLC; AND 

TITAN DEMOLITION, LLC, 

Petitioners, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE 

ELISSA F. CADISH, DISTRICT JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

CAROLYN LOVETT, AS HEIR AND AS 

SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE 

ESTATE OF MARK BRIAN LOVETT; 

JAMES RAY LOVETT, AS HEIR OF 

MARK BRIAN LOVETT; AND THE 

ESTATE OF MARK BRIAN LOVETT, 

Real Parties in Interest. 

No. 69704 

FILED 

MAY 1 3 2016 

TRAGIC K. LINDEMAN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

SY 

DEPUTY CLERK 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause 

appearing, this writ petition is dismissed. The parties shall bear their 

own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b). 

It is so ORDERED. 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

TRACE K. LINDEMAN 

BY: 4....SVW,..t t 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

10)-1947 e I (0- to 
cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge 

Olson, Cannon, Gormley, Angulo & Stoberski 

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas 

Lasater & Martin, P.C. 

Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg 

Morris, Sullivan, Lemkul & Pitegoff/Las Vegas 

Kemp, Jones & Coulthard, LLP 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

01-1947 e 

2