alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Randy Ratajczak, as Administrator of the Estate of Mary Ratajczak, Deceased, Respondent, v Mahmood Yoonessi, M.D., et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Submitted January 18, 2011;

decided March 29, 2011

Motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 23, 2010 dismissal order denied *[see*15 NY3d 913 (2010)]. Motion, insofar as it seeks disqualification of Chief Judge Lippman, dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has no authority to entertain the motion made on nonstatutory grounds. The application seeking recusal is referred to the Chief Judge for his individual consideration and determination. Chief Judge Lippman denies the referred motion for recusal.
Exhibit 18(b)
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                                                 

February 13, 1997

Entergy Corporation
639 Loyola Avenue
New Orleans, Louisiana 70113

Gentlemen:

We  are  providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit
to your Form 10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We   have  read  management's  justification  contained  in   the
Company's Financial Statements which are included in its Form 10-
K  for  the  year  ended December 31, 1996,  for  the  change  in
accounting  principle  of  System  Energy  Resources,  Inc.  from
expensing  incremental  nuclear plant  outage  maintenance  costs
during  the  operating  period in which  they  were  incurred  to
capitalizing  incremental nuclear plant outage maintenance  costs
as  incurred and amortizing them to expense during the  operating
period  between  outages.  Based on  our  reading  of  the  data,
including  documents relating to the Company's  May  1995  filing
with  the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission requesting a  rate
increase, and discussions with Company officials of the  business
judgment and business planning factors relating to the change, we
believe    management's   justification   to    be    reasonable.
Accordingly,   we  concur  that  the  newly  adopted   accounting
principle   described  above  is  preferable  in  the   Company's
circumstances to the method previously applied.


Very truly yours,

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Fund II-OW (the“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officerof the corporate General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|                                                                                                                                |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS  **Douglas P. Williams****Chief Financial Officer****November 13, 2002**   21 |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership VI-A for
the quarter ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>            1

<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 158,705
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             0
<PP&E>                                              20,775,588
<DEPRECIATION>                                       7,712,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      14,057,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        0
<BONDS>                                             11,813,191
<COMMON>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        14,057,032
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,034,378
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1,324,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     285,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (336,203)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (336,203)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                         691,085
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,077,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,415,585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,518,334
<PP&E>                                       2,005,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,127,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,460,874
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,953,162
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,127,399
<SALES>                                      6,574,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,574,740
<CGS>                                        4,505,509
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,060,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   209
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                508,140
<INCOME-TAX>                                   195,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            313,040
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   313,040
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 107 (Friday, June 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27055]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[OMB Control No. 3206-0099; Form RI 25-41]


Proposed Collection; Request for Comment Extension of a Currently 
Approved Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) a request for extension of a currently 
approved information collection. ``This information collection, Initial 
Certification of Full-Time School Attendance'' (OMB Control No. 3206-
0099; Form RI 25-41), is used to determine whether a child is unmarried 
and a full-time student in a recognized school. OPM must determine this 
in order to pay survivor annuity benefits to children who are age 18 or 
older.
    Comments are particularly invited on: Whether this collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the 
Office of Personnel Management, and whether it will have practical 
utility; whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection 
of information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and 
methodology; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on those who are to respond, through the use 
of appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.
    Approximately 1,200 RI 25-41 forms are completed annually. It takes 
approximately 90 minutes to complete the form. The annual burden is 
1,800 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Cyrus S. Benson on (202) 606-
4808, FAX (202) 606-0910 or via E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#12516b6067613c50777c617d7c527d627f3c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e0d373c3b3d600c2b203d21200e213e2360292138">[email protected]</span></a>. Please 
include a mailing address with your request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 60 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--James K. Freiert, Deputy 
Assistant Director, Retirement Services Program, Center for Retirement 
and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E 
Street, NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC 20415-3500.
    For information regarding administrative coordination contact: 
Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/
Support Group, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., 
Room 4H28, Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
[FR Doc. E9-13143 Filed 6-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-38-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NIFC SECURITY GUIDELINES 

***ON SITE SPEED LIMIT 15 MPH*** 

All persons must STOP and provide identification upon entry 

ID Badges must be worn at all times while on site

Upon site entry, show ID badge to entry guard

Display parking pass on vehicle mirror or dash

* Seasonal employees should be ready to provide photo ID in addition to badge

Lost ID badges must be reported immediately to J.Lake 387‐5886 or security

All visitors coming on site MUST have a Valid photo ID

All Vehicle operators are required to have a valid driver’s license in possession

Call the main gate @ 387‐5915 when expecting a visitor or having a family member pick you up.

All parking must be in designated spaces only

Long term parking is to be used when leaving vehicles over‐night or longer on official business

Dogs should not be brought on site. If they must be brought on site, they are not permitted outside

vehicles, in buildings, nor left unattended more than 30 minutes. Police dogs and guide dogs are the

exception

For safety reasons, SLOW DOWN when exiting Gate 5

WARNING: NIFC perimeter fence is alarmed. Do not disturb!
#### PARAMOUNT FILM DISTRIBUTING CORP. et al. v. RAM et al.

Civ. Nos. 2257 to 2264.

United States District Court, E. D. South Carolina, Aiken Division.

May 3, 1954.

See also 91 F.Supp. 778.

*405Augustus T. Graydon, Columbia, S. C., T. Sam Means, Jr., Spartanburg, S. C., Kenneth C. Royall, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Lonnie A. Garvin, Aiken, S. C., H. H. Edens, Henry Hammer, Columbia, S. G., for defendants.

WYCHE, District Judge.

(Sitting by designation.)

The above cases are before me upon Objections by the plaintiffs to Interrogatories propounded by the defendants numbered 1 through 10 and 12 and 13 and 11, 14 and 15.

I have already overruled Objections to Interrogatories 11,14 and 15.

Plaintiffs’ objections to the remaining interrogatories are based upon their contention that the allegations by the defendants of an anti-trust conspiracy do not constitute a valid defense unless the contract between the parties in these actions was inherently illegal in itself without reference to any collateral facts and that such a conspiracy could in no event foe a valid defense in favor of the defendants who are not alleged to be a part of that conspiracy, and consequently the interrogatories propounded are not relevant to the issues involved in the controversies.

 Plaintiffs have argued in their objections to the interrogatories that such a defense is not a valid defense, but so far as I am aware no motion has been made by the plaintiffs to strike this defense of the defendants. I know of no authority that I have to strike such a defense of my own motion. The defense, therefore, until stricken is valid. I cannot say that the interrogatories are not relevant to the issues made by the pleadings. Riordan v. Ferguson, D.C., 2 F.R. D. 349.

The Objections to the Interrogatories are, therefore, overruled, and

It is so ordered.

The plaintiffs will be permitted to renew their Objections to the Interrogatories in the event such defense is hereafter held to be insufficient.
#### THE CREEK. NORTH RIVER BARGE LINE, Inc. v. GRACE LINE, Inc.

No. A 148-383.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Dec. 13, 1947.

See also 8 F.R.D. 118.

Purdy, Lamb, & Catoggio, of New York City (Vincent A. Cattogio, of New York City, of counsel), for libelant.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox & Keating, of New York City (John H. Hanrahan, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

RYAN, District Judge.

Libellant excepts to interrogatories addressed to it by respondent numbered 3, 4, S, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, IS, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 on the ground that the information called for in said interrogatories is incompetent, immaterial and irrelevant and not the proper subject matter of inquiry.

*118, Libellant seeks to recover for damages to a scow chartered to respondent and alleges that the damage was occasioned by the fault, neglect and negligence of respondent.

This Court held in The Velox, D. C., 36 F.Supp. 929, 930, that "Admiralty Rule 31 [28 U.S.C.A. following section 723] is identical with Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and was adopted subsequent thereto, and I think it should be given the same construction.”

Interrogatories under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, have been extended to permit examination concerning all matters which are relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action. It is proposed in the new rules to provide further, in Rule 26(b) which will govern the extent to which interrogatories may go, that “It is not ground for objection that the testimony will be inadmissible at the trial if the testimony sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

The test to be applied is not only that of relevancy, but also whether the testimony sought to be elicited by the interrogatories, even though inadmissible at the trial, “appears to be reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

The answer sets up no affirmative defense and does not plead that the damage done to the scow was occasioned and caused by the act of any third party. The pleadings, in their present form, would make the information sought to be secured by many of the interrogatories not only inadmissible, but the pleadings also preclude the possibility that much of the testimony sought might be “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

Under the present pleadings, the exceptions to interrogatories numbered 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 23 are sustained, and overruled as to interrogatories numbered 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial "Statements at March 31, 1998 (unaudited) and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such" financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,518,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (79,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,383,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,948,000
<PP&E>                                       1,121,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (349,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,771,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,367,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           54,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,073,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,771,000
<SALES>                                     14,264,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,264,000
<CGS>                                       10,938,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,938,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,889,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                334,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            322,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   322,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31(j)

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Theodore H. Bunting, Jr., certify that:1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of System Energy Resources, Inc.;2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.








|/s/ Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of System Energy Resources, Inc.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:	March 9, 2004
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00269-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF W.C.S., a Child

From the 452nd District Court, Mason County, Texas

Trial Court No. 175751

Honorable Robert Rey Hofmann, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORERED that Appellee Candice Hafley recover her costs on appeal from 

Appellant Will Simpson. 

SIGNED July 20, 2022.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice