alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.5


  Exhibit 10.5

  AMENDMENT TO
Stock Transfer Restriction Agreement

   

  THIS AMENDMENT TO THE Stock Transfer Restriction Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made as of June 30, 2022, by and among LifeStance Health Group Inc., a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), TPG VIII Lynwood Holdings Aggregation, L.P. (“TPG”), and Gwendolyn Booth ( “Booth” and collectively with the Company and TPG, the “Parties”).  Any capitalized term not defined herein shall have the meaning given it in the Stock Transfer Restriction Agreement between the Parties and certain other Sponsor Investors, Management Investors and Employee and Other Investors, dated June 9, 2021 (the “Agreement”).

  RECITALS

  Whereas, the Parties wish to modify certain terms of the Agreement solely with respect to Booth; 

  NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties in consideration of the value to the Parties of this Amendment and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, agree as follows:

  AGREEMENT

  1.Transfer Restrictions.  Solely with respect to Booth, effective on July 1, 2022, Section 2.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 


  “Management Investors. Until the two (2)-year anniversary of the closing of Initial Public Offering, no Management Investor shall Transfer a number of Shares exceeding the greater of: (i) that number of Shares the Transfer of which would result in the Relative Ownership Percentage of such Management Investor immediately following such Transfer being less than the Relative Ownership Percentage of the TPG Investor immediately following such Transfer; and (ii) ten percent (10%) of the Vested Equity of such Management Investor at the time of Transfer, in any three-month period (for the avoidance of doubt, excluding any Excluded Transfers).” 

   

  2.Remainder of Agreement Unaffected.  Except to the extent expressly stated herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as written.  


  3.	Facsimile and Counterpart Signature Pages.  This Amendment may be executed by facsimile and in one or more counterparts, each of which counterparts will be deemed to be an original and all of which, which taken together, will be deemed to constitute one in the same agreement.  

  [Signature Page to Amendment Follows]

   

   

  

   

  	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Grantee have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the first date written above. 

   

   

  		
	THE COMPANY:

	 
	 

	LifeStance Health Group, Inc.

	 
	 

	Signature:
	/s/ Ryan Pardo

	Name:
	Ryan Pardo

	Title:
	Chief Legal Officer

	 
	 

	TPG:

	 
	 

	TPG VIII Lynwood Holdings Aggregation, L.P.

	 
	 

	Signature:
	/s/ Deirdre Cummings

	Name:
	Deirdre Cummings

	Title:
	Vice President

	 
	 

	THE PARTICIPANT:

	 
	 

	Signature:
	/s/ Gwendolyn Booth

	 
	Gwendolyn Booth



   

  	2
AGENDA

National Indian Gaming Commission 

Headquarters Office

90 K St. NE Suite 200

Washington, D.C. 20002

October 16, 2018

2:30 pm

I. Welcome and Opening prayer/Blessing.

II. Introduction of Commission, brief statements and Q&A

III. Tribal Leadership Remarks

IV. IGRA History 

V. Chair Panel

VI. Honored Guest Reflections

VII. Open Dialogue Session

VIII. Closing Blessing
Travel Worksheet for a Crew

List casual names: add ECI if common or similar last name

Indicate dates and Type of Travel

List dates to be reimbursed for M&IE, city/state of where the night was spent, and 4-digit fire code

Ensure POV mileage is indicated at reimbursement rate of $0.67 per mile

Approving Official signature

The first & last day of travel are always calculated at 3⁄4 rate (includes $5 incidental expenses) minus the cost of any meals provided:  $44.25 - $26   = $18.25 (total allowance for 1st day)

8/12-8/21 - All meals provided at incident; only Incidental Expenses of $5 reimbursed

SUBMIT FORM TO CPC

Travel Worksheet for a Single Casual

Casual name: add ECI if common last name

Indicate dates and Type of Travel

List dates to be reimbursed for M&IE, city/state of where the night was spent, and 4-digit fire code

Ensure POV mileage is indicated at reimbursement rate of $0.67 per mile

Approving Official signature

The first & last day of travel are always calculated at 3⁄4 rate (includes $5 incidental expenses) minus the cost of any meals provided:  $44.25 - $26   = $18.25 (total allowance for 1st day)

8/12-8/21 - All meals provided at incident; only Incidental Expenses of $5 reimbursed

SUBMIT FORM TO CPC

# image1.tmp

# image2.tmp
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Oswald Jordan, Deceased. Victor Jordan, Appellant; Lenna Susannah Jordan, Respondent.

Decided May 8, 2012

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6489** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MICHAEL PRESTON MCCLAIN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Spartanburg
. Henry M. Herlong, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 7:11

- cr - 00477

- HMH

- 1; 7:14

- cv - 02671

- HMH )

Submitted : August 6, 2015 Decided: August 17, 2015

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael Preston McClain, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CUR IAM: Michael Preston McClain, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the G overnment’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion to vacate. Parties in a civil action in which the United States is a party have sixty days following entry of the judgment in which to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). Because McClain is incarcerated, the notice of appeal is considered filed on the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). The record does not conclusively reveal when McClain delivered the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack . The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,838]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 22, 2009, in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at C & W Industries, Inc., Malden, Massachusetts.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of May 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13458 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
II 

Calendar No. 332 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3152 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23 (legislative day, MARCH 19), 2010 

Mr. DEMINT (for himself, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. VITTER, Mr. RISCH, Mrs. 

HUTCHISON, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. BOND, Mr. LEMIEUX, Mr. CHAMBLISS, 

Mr. INHOFE, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. GRAHAM, and Mr. ENSIGN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read the first time 

MARCH 23, 2010 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL. 

4 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and 

5 the amendments made by that Act, are repealed. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 332 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3152 

A BILL 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act. 

MARCH 23, 2010 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 12(d)

                      Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
       Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and
Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              1997       1998       1999      2000       2001
<S>                                                           <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>
Fixed charges, as defined:
  Total Interest                                              $45,274    $40,927   $38,840    $44,877    $50,991
  Interest applicable to rentals                                1,947      1,864     2,261      1,596      1,849
                                                              --------------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges, as defined                                47,221     42,791    41,101     46,473     52,840

Preferred dividends, as defined (a)                             5,123      4,878     4,878      5,347      4,674
                                                              --------------------------------------------------
Combined fixed charges and preferred dividends, as defined    $52,344    $47,669   $45,979    $51,820    $57,514
                                                              ==================================================
Earnings as defined:

  Net Income                                                  $66,661    $62,638   $41,588    $38,973    $39,620
  Add:
    Provision for income taxes:
    Total income taxes                                         26,744     28,031    17,537     22,868     20,464
    Fixed charges as above                                     47,221     42,791    41,101     46,473     52,840
                                                              --------------------------------------------------
Total earnings, as defined                                   $140,626   $133,460  $100,226   $108,314   $112,924
                                                              ==================================================
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined                   2.98       3.12      2.44       2.33       2.14
                                                              ==================================================
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
 preferred dividends, as defined                                 2.69       2.80      2.18       2.09       1.96
                                                              ==================================================
</TABLE>
------------------------
(a) "Preferred dividends," as defined by SEC regulation S-
    K, are computed by dividing the preferred dividend
    requirement by one hundred percent (100%) minus the
    income tax rate.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Packaging and Logistics Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/  Steve Westlund


Steve Westlund


Chief Executive Officer, President


and Director





August 7, 2009
#### Jacob E. SACKS, d/b/a Cleenz Chemical Company, Plaintiff, v. The FRANK H. LEE COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Oct. 5, 1955.

*501Rubel *&*Silverman, New York City, for plaintiff.

Hahn & Golin, New York City, for defendant.

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

In three actions removed to this court from the Supreme Court, New York County, plaintiff, Jacob E. Sacks d/b/a Cleenz Chemical Company, sues The Frank H. Lee Company (1) for goods sold and delivered, (2) for storage charges and (3) for a balance on open account.

By motion No. 70(a) plaintiff seeks an order pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 30(b), 28 U.S.C.A., restraining the defendant in its taking of the deposition on oral examination of plaintiff from inquiring into the secret formulae and trade and business secrets of the plaintiff.

The information sought to be elicited from plaintiff deals with the items comprising his cost of manufacture of the goods sold to defendant. Plaintiff’s attorney’s affidavit in support of the motion states

> “Furthermore if the defendant is permitted to pry into these records of plaintiff it will force the plaintiff to disclose his secret formulas for the various products in question. If plaintiff is forced to disclose what ingredients he has purchased, he has been forced to show what ingredients are in the products. A chemical analysis by defendant of the products would fail to determine all the chemicals originally put into the products because some of these chemicals disappear in combination with the others in the product. They merely act as catalysts, which iniate [sic] or aecellerate [sic] chemical action of the combining ingredients.”

This is an utterly insufficient showing that the testimony sought will betray any secrets. The hearsay statements of an attorney do not persuade the court on so technical a question as plaintiff raises.

Plaintiff’s motion No. 70(a) is denied.

Defendant moves (motion No. 117) for an order under F.R.Civ. P. 37 directing plaintiff to answer questions propounded to him which he has refused to answer. These questions deal with plaintiff’s cost of manufacture of the goods sold to defendant. Their relevancy to the issues is beyond question. Plaintiff’s opposition to the granting of this motion on the ground of “trade secrets” *502is without merit for the reason set forth in the discussion of motion No. 70(a).

Defendant’s motion No. 117 is granted.

Defendant also moves for an order pursuant to F.R.Civ. P. 34 directing plaintiff to permit defendant to inspect, photograph and obtain samples of certain designated property of defendant’s on plaintiff’s premises. These items are goods processed for and sold to defendant by plaintiff but which have not yet been delivered. Upon the argument plaintiff agreed to supply samples and allow inspection of the premises which would include measurement of the area occupied by the goods. No good cause has been shown to permit photographing.

Defendant’s motion No. 118 is granted to the extent herein indicated.

Settle order on notice.
**Exhibit
23**








**CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 33-89896, 33-25244, 33-87626, 333-36188 and 333-118663 of Analysts
International Corporation on Form S-8 of our reports relating to the
financial statements of Analysts International Corporation and management’s
report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting dated
March 17, 2005, which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to the change in the method of accounting for
goodwill and certain intangibles in 2002, incorporated by reference in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Analysts International Corporation for the
year ended January 1, 2005.











/s/
      Deloitte & Touche LLPMinneapolis,
      MinnesotaMarch
      17, 2005
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Mary Paul, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 460 C.D. 2019

:

Pennsylvania Public Utility :

Commission, :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, September 18, 2023, upon consideration of Petitioner’s

application for reconsideration, and Intervenor PECO Energy Company’s 

answer in response thereto, the application is DENIED.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 317 

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 

for Members of Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2009 

Mr. FEINGOLD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay 

adjustments for Members of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUST4 MENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) 

6 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 

7 31) is repealed. 

8 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

9 Section 601(a)(1) of such Act is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)’’; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 317 IS

1 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 

2 and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; 

3 and 

4 (3) by striking ‘‘as adjusted by paragraph (2) 

5 of this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘adjusted as pro6 vided by law’’. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect 

8 on February 1, 2011. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
|                                                        |     |     |     | Exhibit      12(g) |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------|----------|--------------------|
|                                                        |     |     |     |               |
| System      Energy Resources, Inc.                          |
| Computation      of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and |
| Ratios      of Earnings to Fixed Charges                    |
|                                                        |     |     |     |               |   |
|                                                        |     |     |     |               |   |
|                                                        |     |     |     |               |   |
|                                                        | 2005     | 2006     | 2007     | 2008               | 2009 |
|                                                        |     |     |     |               |   |
| Fixed      charges, as defined:                             |     |     |     |               |   |
|   Total      Interest                             | $60,424  | $59,931  | $57,117  | $56,667            | $47,570 |
|   Interest      applicable to rentals             | 3,039    | 3,914    | 4,463    | 9,057              | 5,885 |
|                                                        |     |     |     |               |   |
| Total      fixed charges, as defined                        | $63,463  | $63,845  | $61,580  | $65,724            | $53,455 |
|                                                        |     |     |     |               |   |
| Earnings      as defined:                                   |     |     |     |               |   |
|   Net      Income                                 | $111,644 | $140,258 | $136,081 | $91,067            | $48,908 |
|   Add:                                            |     |     |     |               |   |
|     Provision      for income taxes:    |     |     |     |               |   |
|       Total                   | 69,343   | 54,529   | 45,447   | 59,494             | 96,901 |
|     Fixed      charges as above         | 63,463   | 63,845   | 61,580   | 65,724             | 53,455 |
|                                                        |     |     |     |               |   |
| Total      earnings, as defined                             | $244,450 | $258,632 | $243,108 | $216,285           | $199,264 |
|                                                        |     |     |     |               |   |
| Ratio      of earnings to fixed charges, as defined         | 3.85     | 4.05     | 3.95     | 3.29               | 3.73 |
|                                                        |     |     |     |               |   |
|                                                        |     |     |     |               |   |
|                                                        |     |     |     |               |   |