alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
<CURRENCY>                                 U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>              
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,647,087 
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     97,742 
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         322,277 
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,351,156 
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,418,262 
<COMMON>                                       178,162 
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    1,039,550 
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            403,843 
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,621,555 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           75,000 
<PREFERRED>                                    193,561 
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,132,021 
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0 
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0 
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 177,800 
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    3,512 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0 
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0 
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0 
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,214,813 
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,418,262 
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,614,952 
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           178,865 
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,054,333 
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,233,198 
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        381,754 
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              25,548 
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 407,302 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       167,732 
<NET-INCOME>                                   239,570 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     19,134 
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  220,436 
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       170,000 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      155,016 
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         542,325 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0 
                                               

</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 99a

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Costas Takkas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB for the period ended
December 31, 2002 of Arbor, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
  that material information relating to the registrant, including its
  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
  entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
  prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
  registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days
  prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and (c) Presented in this report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
  evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
  internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
  record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
  the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
  management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
  internal controls; and


6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Date: May 1, 2003 | _______________________
    Costas Takkas, Chief Executive Officer
|----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------

* Provide a separate certification for each principal
executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant. See Rules
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20558 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS MARQUEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-13-1

-------------------- February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Marquez-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Marquez-Hernandez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry Ivan GARCIA-ALEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40582.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 20, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Henry Ivan Gareia-Aleman appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Garcia-Aleman challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than as elements of the offense that must be found by a jury in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Gareia-Aleman’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Gareia-Aleman contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Gareia-Aleman properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Gareia-Aleman also argues that the district court erred by ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release. This claim is not ripe for review on direct appeal. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). The claim is dismissed. *See id.*at 1102.

*453JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Michael Lurie, Appellant, v Holly Lurie, Respondent.

Submitted April 15, 2013;

decided June 6, 2013

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the portion of Supreme Court’s order denying reargument, dismissed upon the ground that such part of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000823533
<NAME> FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         2,396,600
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     109,477
<MORTGAGE>                                     618,505
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   30,824
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               3,317,585
<CASH>                                        (32,272)
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              15,745
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         296,089
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,144,725
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              2,521,274
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             11,527
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 255,987
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            8,321
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     889,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,144,725
<PREMIUMS>                                     314,177
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             58,731
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              18,054
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  10,589
<BENEFITS>                                     263,517
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     10,343
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            98,153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,533
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,987
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 988,036
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18.
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Arabian American Development Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Nicholas Carter, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Nicholas
Carter


Nicholas
Carter, President and Chief Executive Officer




March 15,
2010



















A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3218 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3218

  To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify that persons who 
enter into a conspiracy within the United States to possess or traffic 
 illegal controlled substances outside the United States, or engage in 
   conduct within the United States to aid or abet drug trafficking 
 outside the United States, may be criminally prosecuted in the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 15, 2010

  Mr. Conrad (for himself and Mr. Sessions) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify that persons who 
enter into a conspiracy within the United States to possess or traffic 
 illegal controlled substances outside the United States, or engage in 
   conduct within the United States to aid or abet drug trafficking 
 outside the United States, may be criminally prosecuted in the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Drug Trafficking Safe Harbor 
Elimination Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT TO CLARIFY 
              CONSPIRACIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE UNITED STATES MAY BE 
              CRIMINALLY PROSECUTED IN THE UNITED STATES.

    Section 406 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 846) is 
amended by--
            (1) inserting ``(a)'' before ``Any''; and
            (2) inserting at the end the following:
    ``(b) Whoever, within the United States, conspires with one or more 
persons, or aids or abets one or more persons, regardless of where such 
other persons are located, to commit at any place outside the United 
States an act that would constitute a violation of this title if 
committed within the United States, shall be subject to the same 
penalties that would apply to such act if it were to occur within the 
United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Terry L. Eilers, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of eTotalSource, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  November 13, 2003


/s/ Terry L. Eilers
-----------------------
Terry L. Eilers,
President & Director
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - VI A (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  the operations of the Partnership.


        August 15, 2005                    /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
        ---------------                    ------------------------------
              Date                         Joseph M. Jayson,
                                           Individual General Partner and
                                           Principal Financial Officer
#### In re: GTI CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC, DBA Rockland Materials, Debtor, Triad Commercial Captive Co.; et al., Appellants, v. Comerica Bank; et al., Appellees.

No. 09-60003.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 6, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 8, 2010.

Before: THOMPSON, FERNANDEZ and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Appellants appeal the bankruptcy court’s approval of a settlement between Appellees David Reaves, the bankruptcy trustee, and Comerica Bank. However, Appellants’ brief does not identify any error in any of the bankruptcy court’s rulings.

Rather, Appellants appear to be seeking on appeal an advisory opinion about the *69effects of the settlement agreement on other litigation. We lack jurisdiction to render advisory opinions. *See Kittel v. Thomas,*620 F.3d 949, 951 (9th Cir.2010).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7503

DARIAN ANTONIO COLEMAN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ASSISTANT WARDEN RANDALL WILLIAMS, each defendant is being 

suited in their individual and official capacity all times

herein; WARDEN JOHN PATE, each defendant is being suited in 

their individual and official capacity all times herein,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(8:14-cv-00748-DCN)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: May 17, 2016

Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darian Antonio Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Christy L. Scott, 

SCOTT & PAYNE LAW FIRM, Walterboro, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Darian Antonio Coleman appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Coleman v. Williams, No. 8:14-cv-00748-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED