alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1


  CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENTS, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE BOLT BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. HAS DETERMINED THE INFORMATION (I) IS NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO BOLT BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.

  CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENTS, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE BOLT BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. HAS DETERMINED THE INFORMATION (I) IS NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO BOLT BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.

  Exhibit 10.1

   

  April 27, 2022

    

    

  Albert C. Lin

  Business Development Director 

  EirGenix, Inc.

  No. 101, Lane 169

  Kangning Street, Xizhi District 

  New Taipei City 22180, Taiwan

    

    

  RE: Clarification regarding certain pricing terms in the Amended and Restated Supply Agreement between Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc. and EirGenix, Inc. dated January 25, 2022

    

    

  Dear Albert,

    

  The purpose of this letter is to document the parties' agreement regarding pricing of Antibody at the [***] under Section5.1 of the above referenced agreement. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined in this letter shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the agreement.

  The parties agree that if Bolt orders a batch of Antibody [***], then the Supply Price for such Antibody would be [***] per gram. This price would apply in the case where the batches [***].

  Please acknowledge EirGenix's agreement with the foregoing by signing below and returning a countersigned version of this letter to me.

    

  Sincerely,

    

    

  Grant Yonehiro

  Chief Business Officer 

  Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc.

    

    

  The undersigned acknowledges and agrees with and to the terms of this letter. 

  On behalf of EirGenix, Inc.

    

  By: /s/ Lee-Cheng Liu

  Names: Lee-Cheng Liu

  Title: President & CEO

  Date: 2022/05/06 

  |www.boltbio.com | 900 Chesapeake Drive | Redwood City | CA | 94063 |	| 1
96-2485.

#### State ex rel. Crum v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 95APD11-1516. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of the agreed motion for remand filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and is, hereby, granted, and this cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the parties shall pay their respective costs herein expended; and that a mandate be sent to the court of appeals to carry this judgment into execution; and that a copy of this entry be certified to the court of appeals for entry.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------



              Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
     As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      The  undersigned  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that,  to
their  knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September
27, 2003 of Innovative  Micro  Technology,  Inc. (the "Company")  fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that the information  contained in such periodic report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of  operations  of the  Company as of, and for,  the periods  presented  in such
report.

Date:  January  9, 2004                         /s/ John S. Foster
                                                --------------------------------
                                                John S. Foster
                                                Chairman and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer


                                                /s/ Peter T. Altavilla
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Peter T. Altavilla
                                                Chief Financial Officer,
                                                   Corporate Controller and
                                                   Secretary




A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



AMENDMENT No. 1
TO
NOTE PURCHASE AND PRIVATE SHELF AGREEMENT
     Definitions.
 Facility Amount.
 Amendment to Paragraph 2B(2).




---



##### 



Uncommitted Facility. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THIS AMENDMENT AND THE AGREEMENT HAVE BEEN ENTERED INTO ON THE EXPRESS UNDERSTANDING THAT NEITHER PRUDENTIAL NOR ANY
PRUDENTIAL AFFILIATE SHALL BE OBLIGED TO MAKE OR ACCEPT OFFERS TO PURCHASE SHELF NOTES, OR TO QUOTE
RATES, SPREADS OR OTHER TERMS WITH RESPECT TO SPECIFIC PURCHASES OF SHELF NOTES, AND THE FACILITY
SHALL IN NO WAY BE CONSTRUED AS A COMMITMENT BY PRUDENTIAL OR ANY PRUDENTIAL AFFILIATE.
 Company Representations.
 Effective Date.
 General Provisions.
 7.1
    
    The Note Agreement, except as expressly modified herein, shall continue in
full force and effect and shall continue to be binding upon the parties thereto.7.2
    
    The execution, delivery and effectiveness of the Amendment shall not operate
as a waiver of any right, power or remedy of the Purchasers under the Note
Agreement, nor constitute a waiver of any provision of the Note Agreement.
 Reference to and Effect on Note Agreement.
 Governing Law.
 Counterparts.
 2




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 COMPANY:CHS Inc.By:
    
    /s/ John Schmitz                    4/9/07Name:
    
    John SchmitzTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer
 PRUDENTIAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.By:
    
    /s/ G. A. Coletta

Vice PresidentTHE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICABy:
    
    /s/  G. A. Coletta

Vice PresidentING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANYBy:
    
    Prudential Private Placement Investors, L.P.(as Investment Advisor)By:
    
    Prudential Private Placement Investors, Inc.(as its General Partner)By:
    
    /s/  G. A. Coletta

Vice President
 3




---



##### 



RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYBy:
    
    Prudential Private Placement Investors,L.P. (as Investment Advisor)By:
    
    Prudential Private Placement Investors, Inc.(as its General Partner)By:
    
    /s/  G. A. Coletta

Vice PresidentMUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANYBy:
    
    Prudential Private Placement Investors,L.P. (as Investment Advisor)By:
    
    Prudential Private Placement Investors, Inc.(as its General Partner)By:
    
    /s/  G. A. Coletta

Vice PresidentUNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYBy:
    
    Prudential Private Placement Investors,L.P. (as Investment Advisor)By:
    
    Prudential Private Placement Investors, Inc.(as its General Partner)By:
    
    /s/  G. A. Coletta

Vice President
 4
#### Frederick SIMUNICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-15795.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 2006.*

Filed June 23, 2006.

Frederick Simunich, Phoenix, AZ, pro se.

Rachel R. Aexander, Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Division of County Counsel, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant — Appellee.

Before: WALLACE, KLEINFELD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Frederick Simunich appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action challenging a proposition that appeared on the ballot in an Arizona special election. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Fisher,*104 F.3d 280, 284 (9th Cir.1997) (dismissals based on res judicata); *Bianchi v. Rylaarsdam,*334 F.3d 895, 898 (9th Cir.2003) (dismissals based on *Rooker-Feldman),*and we affirm.

The district court properly concluded that to the extent Simunich could have raised his claims in state court, these claims are precluded by res judicata. *See Olson v. Morris,*188 F.3d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.1999) (“[Under Arizona law, the] doctrine [of res judicata] binds the same party standing in the same capacity in subsequent litigation on the same cause of action, not only upon facts actually litigated but also upon those points that might have been litigated.”). Moreover, to the extent Simunich’s complaint challenged the rulings of the Arizona state courts, the district court properly dismissed this action for lack of jurisdiction because it is a forbidden de facto appeal. *See Noel v. Hall,*341 F.3d 1148,1163-64 (9th Cir.2003).

Simunich’s remaining contentions lack merit.

Ml pending motions and requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Tennessee Valley Authority (Meeting No. 09-03). 

# Time and Date:

10:15 a.m. (EDT), June 4, 2009, Young Harris College, Clegg Fine Arts Building, Glenn Auditorium, 1 College Street, Young Harris, Georgia 30582. 

# Status:

Open. 

## Agenda 

### Old Business 

Approval of minutes of April 2, 2009, Board Meeting. 

### New Business 

1. Chairman's Report. 

2. President's Report. 

A. Potential gas-fired generation plant. 

3. Report of the Finance, Strategy, Rates, and Administration Committee. 

A. Modified two-part real-time pricing product. 

B. Seasonal time-of-use rates and interaction with growth credits. 

4. Report of the Operations, Environment, and Safety Committee. 

A. Contract with Areva NP/DZ, LLC, for Nuclear Steam Supply System services and related parts. 

5. Report of the Audit, Governance, and Ethics Committee. 

6. Report of the Community Relations and Energy Efficiency Committee. 

A. Temporary enhanced growth credit policy. 

B. Grant of a 30-year term public recreation easement to Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency affecting 8.6 acres on Fort Loudoun Reservoir. 

C. Regional Resource Stewardship Council membership. 

# For more information:

                        Please call TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. People who plan to attend the meeting and have special needs should call (865) 632-6000. Anyone who wishes to comment on any                               ( print page 26485)                            of the agenda in writing may send their comments to: TVA Board of Directors, Board Agenda Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.                     

Dated: May 28, 2009. 

Maureen H. Dunn, 

General Counsel and Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-12898 Filed 5-29-09; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
Exhibit 12

                      ARISTAR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

             COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Year Ended December 31,          

(Dollars in Thousands)             1995      1994      1993      1992      1991
<S>                            <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Income from operations before
 income taxes and, in 1992,
 cumulative effect of a change
 in accounting principle       $ 93,134  $ 91,592  $ 79,683  $ 75,728  $ 63,430

Fixed charges:
 Interest and debt
 expense on all
 indebtedness                    91,257    87,074    86,385    89,005    80,261

Appropriate portion
 of rentals (33%)                 2,875     2,537     2,825     2,358     2,157

Total fixed charges              94,132    89,611    89,210    91,363    82,418

Earnings available for
 fixed charges                 $187,266  $181,203  $168,893  $167,091  $145,848

Ratio of earnings to
 fixed charges                     1.99      2.02      1.89      1.83      1.77
</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1






Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of China Granite Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, [to such officer's knowledge],
that:




The Form
10-KSB for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2005(the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:
      March 26, 2008
            /s/
      Costas M. TakkasCostas
      M. Takkas, PresidentDated:
      March 26, 2008
            /s/
      Costas TakkasCostas
      Takkas, Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
$207

$615

$106

$76

-$10

$96

$47

$72

$279 $283

$104

$209

$5

$75

$168

$192

$149

$401

$134 $126

$8 $2

$190

-$151

-$200

-$100

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

Portland Sacramento Phoenix St. Paul Rapid City Tulsa OK City Washington

DC

($K)

10

Annual GGR Change by Region FY17-FY19

FY17 vs FY16 FY18 vs FY17 FY19 vs FY18
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1








                             CONSENT OF KPMG LLP







The Board of Directors
Aqua-Chem, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
333-60759 on Form S-4 of Aqua-Chem, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 1997,
relating to the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows of Aqua-Chem, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December
31, 1996, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears
in the March 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Aqua-Chem, Inc.



Milwaukee, Wisconsin
June 28, 1999
lyra-ex102_68.htm



Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO LYRA THERAPEUTICS, INC.

2022 EMPLOYMENT INDUCEMENT AWARD PLAN

 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE LYRA THERAPEUTICS, INC. 2022 EMPLOYMENT

 

INDUCEMENT AWARD PLAN (this “Amendment”) is made and adopted by Lyra Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan (as defined below).

WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Lyra Therapeutics, Inc. 2022 Employment Inducement Award Plan (the “Plan”).

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan as set forth below.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows:


	
 
	
1.
	
Section 11.28 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:




 

11.28 “Overall Share Limit” means 1,703,002 Shares.

 

2.This Amendment is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan. All other terms of the Plan shall remain unchanged except as specifically modified herein. The Plan, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby ratified and confirmed.

 

 

ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS: June 29, 2022
Page 1 of 7.
     The Exhibit Index
     appears on page 5.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549

____________


FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1996
Commission File Number 33-20110-02

____________


COOPERATIVE UTILITY TRUST
(BIG RIVERS SERIES)
1988-A3
(Issuer of the Certificates)

CoBANK, ACB
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

     UNITED STATES  84-1102254
     (State or other jurisdiction of    (I.R.S. Employer
     incorporation or organization)     Identification No.)

5500 South Quebec Street, Englewood, Colorado     80111
(Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)

(303) 740-4000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

__________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes   X   No  __

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
registrant's classes of common stock as
of the latest practicable date:  not applicable.




PART I--FINANCIAL INFORMATION

     Financial information has not been included in
accordance with the no action letter issued
to Louisville Bank for Cooperatives (now merged into CoBank,
ACB) (pub. avail. March 22,
1988) (the "No Action Letter").



PART II--OTHER INFORMATION

     Item 1 through item 4 have not been included either
because such items are inapplicable or
in accordance with the No Action Letter.

Item 5.   Other Information.

     On August 15, 1996, certain distributions were made by
the trustee, as more specifically
described in a Semiannual Report dated February 15, 1996,
and delivered to the holders of the
Certificates of Beneficial Interests after such
distribution.  This Semiannual Report is filed as
Exhibit 21.1 to this report pursuant to the No Action
Letter.

Item 6(b).     Reports on Form 8-K.

     (a)  Exhibits.

     21.1 Semiannual Report dated August 15, 1996, from the
CoBank, ACB, as
the Servicer, to Holders of Certificates of Beneficial
Interests.

     (b)  Reports on Form 8-K.

     No report on Form 8-k has been filed during the quarter
for which this report is
filed.





SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


     CoBANK, ACB


November 1, 1996         /s/ Margaret E. Newell
                    Vice President and Manager of General
Accounting


November 1, 1996         /s/ William D. Snider
                    Chief Financial Officer




EXHIBIT INDEX



     Exhibit        Sequential
       No.          Page No.

     21.1 Semiannual Report dated August 15, 1996,
6
          from CoBank, ACB, as the Servicer,
          to Holders of Certificates of Beneficial
Interests.
#### FALCON INDUSTRIES, Inc. v. R. S. HERBERT CO., Inc., et al.

Civ. A. No. 14128.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

April 28, 1954.

Alexander, Maltitz, Derenberg & Daniels, New York City, by Louis Kunin, Flushing, N. Y., for plaintiffs, for the motion.

Abraham J. Nydick, New York City, for defendants, in opposition.

*395RAYFIEL, District Judge.

The plaintiffs sue the defendants herein for patent infringement and unfair competition in the manufacture and sale of a pipe called “Falcon” by the plaintiffs and “Viking” by the defendants.

The plaintiffs now move for discovery of certain documents pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rales of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. in connection with the taking of the deposition of two of the individual defendants.

The defendants object to all of the items requested in the notice of motion except the last sentence of item A.

I agree with the plaintiffs’ position that the Rules regarding examination, discovery and inspection should be liberally construed, Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 67 S.Ct. 385, 91 L.Ed. 451. In my opinion they have shown good cause for their discovery and inspection as required by Rule 34.

However, I do not think that the plaintiffs, in a suit of this kind, are entitled to discovery as to the defendants’ profits, distribution and sales until there has been an adjudication as to the merit of the plaintiffs’ claim for patent infringement and unfair competition. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., v. Dubois Brewing Co., D.C., 3 F.R.D. 336; Lyophile-Cryochem Corporation v. Charles Pfizer & Co. Inc., D.C., 7 F.R.D. 362.

Accordingly, the defendants are required to comply with the following: The last sentence of “A”; “B”; “C”; “E,” except the phrase “of profits in the production, distribution, and sale of Viking pipes complained of,” “F” except the phrase “of profits between the corporate defendants and Henry, Leonard and Thomas and Mr. Henry Levitas,” otherwise denied.

Settle order on notice.
Document

AMENDMENT TO 
EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT
This Amendment to the Executive Employment Contract (“Agreement”) is made as of August 1, 2022 by and between Applied Blockchain, Inc. (the “Employer”) and Regina Ingel (the “Employee”).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Employer and the Employee entered into an Executive Employment Contract on November 1, 2021 (the “Agreement”);
WHEREAS, the Employer and Employee desire to revise certain terms of the Agreement as discussed more fully in this Amendment (“Amendment”);  
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.    All terms and conditions of the Agreement between the Employee and the Employer shall remain in full force and effect except as expressly modified herein, and there shall be no modification of such terms and conditions except as expressly made herein.
2.    Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is hereby amended to change Employee’s title to be “Chief Marketing Officer.” 
3.    Paragraph 8 of the Agreement is hereby amended to change the amount of the base annual salary to $185,000 and to further provide that the Employer and Employee may from time to time during the Term of the Agreement, review and adjust (but not downward) the base salary based upon Employee's performance, without the need for a formal Amendment to this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment to the Agreement as of the date first written above.


APPLIED BLOCKCHAIN, INC.    REGINA INGEL
        
By:                                 
    Name:
    Title:


4874-2823-2996v.3
#### In the Matter of Jerry Lineberger, Appellant, v Norman Bezio, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Decided May 8, 2012

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.