alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1335

_____________________________

KENDRICK RISCHARD JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

June 26, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Appellant is warned that any future filings that 

this court determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition 

of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se 

filings in this court and a referral to the appropriate institution for 

disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida 

Statutes (2023) (providing that “[a] prisoner who is found by a 

court to have brought a frivolous or malicious suit, action, claim, 

proceeding, or appeal” is subject to disciplinary procedures 

pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections).

ROWE, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Kendrick Rischard Johnson, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Mark L. Weinstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.



|                       |  |                                       
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Dated: August 11, 2006 |  | /s/ Mark L. Weinstein*                
|                       |  | Mark L. Weinstein, President and Chief
|                       |  | Executive Officer                     
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)         

---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Sample Tribe/TGRA Training Records Form**

**Agency Name:**

**CJIS Security Policy (CJISSECPOL) Area 2: Awareness and Training (AT).**

**Section 5.2 (AT)** Security training is key to the human element of information security. All users with authorized access to CJI should be made aware of their individual responsibilities and expected behavior when accessing CJI and the systems which process CJI. LASOs require enhanced training on the specific duties and responsibilities of those positions and the impact those positions have on the overall security of information systems. (see CJISSECPOL Section 5.2 (AT-1) through Section 5.2 (AT-4))

**Section 5.2 (AT-2, a,1) Literacy Training and Awareness**- a. Provide security and privacy literacy training to system users (including managers, senior executives, and contractors): 1. As part of initial training for new users **prior to accessing** CJI and annually thereafter.

**Section 5.2 (AT-4) Training Records-**a. Document and monitor information security and privacy training activities, including security and privacy awareness training and specific role-based security and privacy training; and b. Retain individual training records for a minimum of three years.

CERTIFICATION:

The persons named above have received the required training in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. 

LASO: ___________________________________________			Date: _____________________

**NIGC Advisory Notice:  Keep training logs on file. Training logs will be reviewed during audits. The NIGC will also periodically request the agency to submit training logs as part of quality assurance and compliance review. Please do not send them to the NIGC unless requested.**

# image1.jpeg
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Shaw, Appellant.

Submitted November 15, 2010;

decided December 14, 2010

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 denied as unnecessary and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
Exhibit 31.2

Rule 13a-14(a)

CERTIFICATION

I, Harry V. Maccarrone, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of COMFORCE Corporation, hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of COMFORCE Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 20, 2006



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Harry V. Maccarrone                             
|Harry V. Maccarrone                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



E-7
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post Effective Amendment Number
19 to Registration Statement Number 2-8439 on Form S-3 dated November 10, 1983,
Post Effective Amendment Number 1 to Registration Statement Number 33-18316 on
Form S-8 dated December 14, 1987, Registration Statement Number 33-87992 on Form
S-3 dated January 13, 1995 and Post Effective Amendment Number 1 to Registration
Statement Number 33-65165 on Form S-3 dated February 2, 1996 and the Related
Prospectuses of our report on the financial statements and schedule included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Atlas Corporation for the year ended December
31, 1997.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 31, 1998
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-60560

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CLIFF STOKES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:95-CR-72-3-B

- - - - - - - - - -

October 18, 2000

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Cliff Stokes appeals from the district court’s denial of his

motions for production of a transcript at government expense, for

copies of all records regarding his case at government expense,

and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Even if it

is assumed that Stokes was indigent, he was not entitled to

production of a transcript and copies of all court records

regarding his case at government expense in order to search for

possible defects. See Walker v. United States, 424 F.2d 278,

278-79 (5th Cir. 1970). Furthermore, because there was no action
No. 99-60560

-2-

or appeal pending, the district court could not have granted his

motion to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

Accordingly, the instant appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS

and Stokes’s request for appointment of counsel is DENIED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification of Principal Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted By the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nextel Communications, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy
M. Donahue, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002) that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ TIMOTHY M. DONAHUE
Timothy M. Donahue
Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 14, 2003
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---



##### 



Certification of Principal Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,
As Adopted By the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nextel Communications, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul N.
Saleh, Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ PAUL N. SALEH
Paul N. Saleh
Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 14, 2003
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Jon D. Klugh, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Infinity, Inc.;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting

Date:  May 17, 2004


/s/ Jon D. Klugh
-------------------------------------------
Jon D. Klugh, Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,571]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 12, 2009, in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Chrysler LLC, Warren Office Building, Warren, Michigan. The workers at the subject facility are engaged in activities related to the production of motor vehicles and parts.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 5th day of May 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13446 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 5 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk December 5 , 2018

15 8 645 ( 1 8 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 158 645

v COA: 345218

Oakland CC: 2015

- 255833

- FH

, 2015

- 255834

- FH

STEVEN BARRY RUZA

, Defendant

- Appellant

.

____________________________________ _ _ ____ /

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of pl a intiff

- appellee to extend the time for

filing its answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer will be

accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before January 17 , 2019

.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3129 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3129

  To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to allow States to certify 
   children for participation in the special supplemental nutrition 
    program for women, infants, and children for a period of 1 year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2010

Mrs. Gillibrand introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to allow States to certify 
   children for participation in the special supplemental nutrition 
    program for women, infants, and children for a period of 1 year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION PROGRAM FOR WOMEN, INFANTS, 
              AND CHILDREN.

    Section 17(d)(3)(A) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 
1786(d)(3)(A)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``clause (ii)'' and 
        inserting ``clauses (ii) and (iii)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iii) Children.--A State may elect to 
                        certify children for a period of 1 year.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### BROWN v. UNITED STATES LINES CO.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

Dec. 7, 1953.

Arkin & Kottler, New York City, for plaintiff.

Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, for defendant.

SUGARMAN, District Judge.

Defendant "excepts” to plaintiff’s answers to eleven of the fourteen interrogatories propounded by defendant, on the ground that the answers are not responsive.

Although the local rules of this court contain no provision governing a situation such as here presented,1 this court may entertain a motion to require further answers to interrogatories, as have other districts, lacking such specific local rule.2

The instant “exceptions” by defendant to plaintiff’s answers to its interrogatories are so treated.

Plaintiff is the administratrix of a deceased seaman who died on March 29, 1953 allegedly as a result of injuries sustained aboard defendant’s vessel at Bremerhaven, Germany, on March 17, 1953. The complaint alleges negligence and unseaworthiness as the proximate cause of the deceased’s injuries and death.

In opposition to defendant’s “exceptions”, plaintiff's attorney states that the answers are as responsive as possible at the present time. A reading of the interrogatories and answers thereto convinces me that the interrogatories said to be unanswered have been answered as fully and completely as is possible at present.3

Accordingly, defendant’s “exceptions” to plaintiff’s answers to its interrogatories, here 'treated as a motion by defendant for further answers to its interrogatories, is denied.

Settle order.

1

. See Civil Rule 13, N.D.N.Y.

2

. Kraft v. Washington & Jefferson College, D.C.W.D.Pa., 11 F.R.D. 503; Sikes Co. v. Swift & Co., D.C.W.D.N.Y., 9 F.R.D. 19.

3

. Carstens v. Great Lakes Towing Co., D.C.Ohio, 71 F.Supp. 394.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             130
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      634
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        367
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,152
<PP&E>                                           7,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,839)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,583
<BONDS>                                             91
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,534
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,275)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,934
<SALES>                                          1,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,531
<CGS>                                            2,811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 357
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,065)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,065)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,532
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,533)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)
        

</TABLE>