alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - [Docket No. 070827327-7327-01]
          - RIN 0648-XS21

# AGENCY:

                         National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and                               ( print page 54549)                            Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.                    

# ACTION:

 Notice of vendor to provide year 2010 cage tags.

# SUMMARY:

 NMFS informs surfclam and ocean quahog allocation owners that they will be required to purchase their year 2010 cage tags from the National Band and Tag Company. The intent of this notice is to comply with regulations for the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries and to promote efficient distribution of cage tags.

# ADDRESSES:

 Written inquiries may be sent to: Regional Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Regional Office, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-2298.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Anna Macan, Fishery Management Specialist, (978) 281-9165; fax (978) 281-9135.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog fishery regulations at 50 CFR 648.75(b) authorize the Regional Administrator of the Northeast Region, NMFS, to specify in the                     **Federal Register**                     a vendor from whom cage tags, required under the Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery Management Plan (FMP), shall be purchased. Notice is hereby given that National Band and Tag Company of Newport, Kentucky, is the authorized vendor of cage tags required for the year 2010 Federal surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries. Detailed instructions for purchasing these cage tags will be provided in a letter to allocation owners in these fisheries from NMFS within the next several weeks.                

Authority:16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: October 16, 2009.

Emily H. Menashes,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. E9-25468 Filed 10-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.1
                                                                  ------------

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Zsolt Rumy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.

Date:  December 27, 2006                     By: /s/ Zsolt Rumy
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                     Zsolt Rumy
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
[939 NE2d 805, 913 NYS2d 639]

#### Francesco Strangio, Appellant, v Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Thomas Johnson, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Decided November 30, 2010

*915APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria LLP,*Buffalo *(John A. Collins*of counsel), for appellant.

*Phillips Lytle LLP,*Buffalo *(William D. Christ*and *Donna M. Lanham*of counsel), for Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. and another, respondents.

*Sliwa & Lane,*Buffalo *(Michael T Coutu*of counsel), for Thomas Johnson, Inc., respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by denying the motions of defendants and the third-party defendant for summary judgment insofar as they seek dismissal of plaintiffs Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and, as so modified, affirmed.

Triable issues of fact exist as to whether the defendants provided proper protection under Labor Law § 240 (1). Plaintiffs remaining contentions lack merit.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order modified, etc.
Exhibit   99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westford Technology Ventures, L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jeffery T. Hamilton, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.



/s/      Jeffrey T. Hamilton
------------------------------------
Jeffery T. Hamilton
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
#### HERTZ v. HUDSON MOTOR CAR CO. et al.

Civ. A. No. 630.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Jan. 7, 1939.

R. H. McNeill, of Washington, D. G, for plaintiff.

Hogan & Hartson, of Washington, D. G, for defendants.

COX, Associate Justice.

The complaint alleges negligence by the Hudson Company in manufacturing and assembling the parts of an automobile and by the Packard Company, the agent of the Hudson Company, in selling and delivering the automobile in a defective and dangerous condition, as a result of which a wheel collapsed and caused the death of plaintiff’s wife.

The Insurance Company, as insurer of the Hudson Company “against damages by reason of negligence in the manufacture or sale of its said car”, is joined as defendant for the sole reason that in the event of recovery by the plaintiff, the Hudson Company would have a cause of action against it. The Insurance Company moves to dismiss on the ground that no cause for relief is stated against it,—neither privity of contract between it and the plaintiff nor negligence on its part being alleged. To justify the joinder, plaintiff relies on Rule 18 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.GA.

Ordinarily, not the plaintiff but the Hudson Company would determine whether and when it would sue the Insurance Company. The latter may be entirely willing to meet its obligation. No reason or necessity appears on the part of the plaintiff for suing it and to permit the joinder might prove prejudicial both to its interest and to the interest of the Hudson Company. To permit the plaintiff to show that the defendant is protected by liability insurance is held to be reversible error in the trial of a cause such as this. Capitol Construction Co. v. Holtzman, 27 App.D.C. 125; Brooke v. Croson, 61 App.D.C. 159, 58 F.2d 885; Culp v. Repper, 64 App.D.C. 337, 78 F.2d 221. Rule 18 is not understood to authorize a plaintiff to join as de*432fendant a party against whom he asserts no claim and by whom no claim can be asserted against him.

The motion of the Insurance Company to dismiss is sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1997
<CASH>                                            1000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 108 (Monday, June 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27162]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13174]



[[Page 27162]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary is 
announcing a public meeting of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public 
Advisory Committee.

DATES: June 25, 2009, at 10:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council Office, 441 West 5th 
Avenue, Suite 500, Anchorage, Alaska.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Mutter, Department of the 
Interior, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, 1689 ``C'' 
Street, Suite 119, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, (907) 271-5011.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Public Advisory Committee was created by 
Paragraph V.A.4 of the Memorandum of Agreement and Consent Decree 
entered into by the United States of America and the State of Alaska on 
August 27, 1991, and approved by the United States District Court for 
the District of Alaska in settlement of United States of America v. 
State of Alaska, Civil Action No. A91-081 CV. The meeting agenda will 
include a review of the draft fiscal year 2010 work plan and budget.

Willie R. Taylor,
Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance.
[FR Doc. E9-13174 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RG-P
Exhibit 10.4
AMENDMENT TO RSU AGREEMENT
Reference is made to that certain Restricted Stock Unit Agreement evidencing the restricted stock unit granted effective as of March 2, 2021 to James Mullen (the “RSU Agreement”).  The RSU Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
1.Section 7(b) of the RSU Agreement is amended by deleting the second and third sentence thereof such that Section 7(b) shall read in its entirety as follows:
“(b) Withholding.  The Participant acknowledges and agrees that the Company has the right to deduct from payments of any kind otherwise due to the Participant any federal, state, local or other taxes of any kind required by law to be withheld with respect to the vesting of the RSUs.  The Company shall not deliver any shares of Common Stock to the Participant until it is satisfied that all required withholdings have been made.”
2.The RSU Agreement shall be amended by deleting Exhibit A thereto.
3.Except as specifically amended herein, the RSU Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.  Upon the effectiveness of this Amendment, each reference in the RSU Agreement to “the Agreement,” “this Agreement,” “hereunder,” “hereof,” “herein” or words of like import, and each reference in the other documents entered into in connection with the RSU Agreement, shall mean and be a reference to the RSU Agreement as amended hereby.
4.This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and signatures may be delivered by facsimile, each of which may be executed by less than all parties, each of which shall be enforceable against the parties actually executing such counterparts, and all of which together shall constitute one instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to RSU Agreement as of the date first written above.
EDITAS MEDICINE, INC.
By:_/s/ Charlene Stern__________________
Name: Charlene Stern
Title:  EVP, General Counsel
​
/s/ James Mullen​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​
James Mullen
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00088-CR

Juan Manuel GONZALEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1989CRA000237D3

Honorable Elma Teresa Salinas Ender, Judge Presiding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 27, 2022

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

This is an appeal from one count of murder. Appellant was convicted by jury trial on July 

24, 1989. The written judgment states the sentence was imposed on July 25, 1989. 

On August 3, 1989, Gonzalez’s counsel filed a notice of appeal, and his appeal followed. 

This court affirmed his conviction on April 24, 1991, in case number 04-89-00401-CR.

On February 11, 2022, Appellant filed a notice of appeal, pro se, challenging his 

conviction. On February 22, 2022, we ordered Appellant to show cause why his appeal should not 

1 Beckie Palomo is the current presiding judge of the 341st District Court in Webb County.
04-22-00088-CR

- 2 -

be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.2 To date, this court has not received a response to the order 

to show cause. Even if we consider the current notice of appeal as an untimely motion for rehearing 

from the opinion in 04-89-00401-CR, this court’s plenary power from that appeal expired on June 

24, 1991. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1; Rodriguez v. State, 28 S.W.3d 25, 26 (Tex. App.—Houston 

[1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.). We now dismiss the purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish 

2 A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 

522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
**Appendix 1**

**Fire and Aviation Preparedness Review Guide**

**Suggested Drill**

**Drill #12*Fire and Aviation Preparedness Review Guide***

**Helitack/Helispot**

April 2000

A-

Drill 12-1Revised 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2905 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2905

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the reduction in 
       the deductible portion of expenses for business meals and 
                             entertainment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 17, 2009

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the reduction in 
       the deductible portion of expenses for business meals and 
                             entertainment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REDUCTION IN BUSINESS MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT TAX 
              DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 274(n)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to only 50 percent of meal and entertainment expenses 
allowed as deduction) is amended by striking ``50 percent'' and 
inserting ``80 percent''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 274(n) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph (3).
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The heading for section 274(n) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``Only 50 
Percent'' and inserting ``Portion''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered April 15, 2020

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00886

- CR

LATAURUS KENSHEY MUR PHY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Cr iminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F 19

- 00400

- X

O RDER

Before the Court is the State ’ s April 14, 2020 motion to extend time to file

its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received with the motion

filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of FC Banc Corp. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Coleman J. Clougherty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/    Coleman J. Clougherty
|Coleman J. Clougherty,      
|Chief Financial Officer     



March 29, 2004



65
#### In the Matter of Douglas B. Worth, Appellant, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

Submitted September 13, 2010;

decided November 18, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 17, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 17, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17I0061. WELLSTAR HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al. v. JENNIFER PAHL et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2014A3225
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |     |  |                         |  | 
|-------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|March 16, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert A. Paul      |  | 
|               |  |     |  | Director, Chairman and  |  | 
|               |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|               |  |     |  | Robert A. Paul          |  | 



|                                      |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|ampco pittsburgh | 2010 annual report |  |  |  |
#### Theresa LIVINGSTONE, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2006-7186.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 13, 2006.

Theresa Livingstone, pro se.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Theresa Livingstone’s motion for leave to withdraw her appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted and this appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
EXHIBIT
23.01





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Forms
S-3 (Registration No.'s 333-1314, 333-15959) and Forms S-8 (Registration No.'s
333-1136, 333-1138) of Sandston Corporation of our report dated March 27, 2009
on the financial statements of Sandston Corporation as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Sandston Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008.





/s/ Plante & Moran,
PLLCAuburn
      Hills, MichiganMarch
      27, 2009