alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SHARLOT et al. v. FORD MOTOR CO.

Civil Action No. 3106.

District Court, E. D. New York.

Sept. 7, 1945.

Irving J. Sharlot, of New York City, for plaintiffs (for the motion).

Alfred W. Andrews, of New York City, for defendant (opposed).

KENNEDY, District Judge.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained in October, 1939, at the defendant’s building at the World’s Fair, New York. Plaintiff’s attorney is her husband.

The action was commenced September, 1942, in the Supreme Court of New York in Nassau County. It was removed to this Court on January 22, 1943. Defendant answered on January 29, 1943. The case was placed on the dismissal calendar on June 24, 1944, and on June 26, 1944, Judge Inch entered an order dismissing the action. The present application is to rescind the order of Judge Inch and to restore the case to the calendar. The motion papers were filed on May 11, 1945, nearly 11 months after the order of dismissal. Plaintiff’s attorney says that in May, 1944, he was required to have an appendicitis operation, and that he was convalescing for about two months thereafter. In an affidavit prepared on May 8, 1945, he says that “several months ago your deponent was informed by his counsel that the office of the attorney for the defendant had informed.him that this case had been dismissed.”

In opposition to the motion it is urged that Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, prohibits the rescinding of Judge Inch’s order because six months and more have elapsed since it was made. In reply plaintiff says that the motion is actually brought under Rule 55(c). However, plaintiff seems to have overlooked the fact that Rule 55(c) *156specifically limits the power of the Court to relieve against judgments by default to the power granted under Rule 60(b). Actually, this case is ruled by Wallace v. United States, 2 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 240. In that case Judge Frank wrote for reversal of the judgment. In the course of the opinion he plainly indicates that dismissals like the one at bar are subject to the terms of Rule 60(b), and says that the six months’ limitation contained in Rule 60(b) is so emphatic as to preclude exceptions even by way of Rule 6(b) and Rule 6(c), both of which seem to give wide latitude and discretion to the district court in the matter of enlargement of time and proceedings after the term has expired.

The motion is denied for the want of power.

Settle order on notice.
#### James L. Melcher, Appellant, v Apollo Medical Fund Management L.L.C. et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 14, 2011;

decided April 5, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the orders sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      50,000
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,000
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,448
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    55,356
<OTHER-SE>                                 (19,804)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,000
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Edward J. Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc.,
hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
2007 of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-KSB) upon my best knowledge and
belief fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Derma Sciences, Inc.

|Dated:  March 31, 2008 | /s/ Edward J. QuiltyEdward J. Quilty
     Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                            Exhibit 21


                       SUBSIDIARIES
                       ------------


Registrant:  Angelica Corporation, State of Incorporation:  Missouri


                                                             Percentage
                                                             of Voting
                                                             Securities
                                      State of               Owned by
       Name                           Incorporation          Registrant
       ----                           -------------          ----------

Angelica Realty Co.            California                       100%
Angelica Textile
  Services, Inc.               California                       100%
Angelica International Ltd.    Federal Corporation, Canada      100%
Angelica Textile
  Services, Inc.               New York                         100%
Southern Service Company       California                       100%
Industrias Textiles El Curu    Costa Rica                       100%
Angelica Holdings Limited<F*>  United Kingdom                   100%

Retail operations of the Registrant include a chain of 309 retail
uniform specialty shops operating under the umbrella name of "Life
Uniform and Shoe Shops."  Generally, all shops operating in a specific
state form one company incorporated under the laws of that state.  All
such corporations (38) are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant.

[FN]
<F*>Parent Company of Angelica International Limited, incorporated under
the laws of the United Kingdom, all of whose voting securities were
owned by Angelica Holdings Limited.  Angelica International Limited was
sold March 1, 1999.

All of the above subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial
statements filed herewith.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 39 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 39

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2005

              Referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
         To express the sense of Congress on the Purple Heart.

Whereas the Purple Heart is the oldest military decoration in the world in 
        present use;
Whereas the Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the President of the United 
        States to members of the Armed Forces who are wounded in conflict with 
        an enemy force or are wounded while held by an enemy force as prisoners 
        of war, and posthumously to the next of kin of members of the Armed 
        Forces who are killed in conflict with an enemy force or who die of a 
        wound received in conflict with an enemy force;
Whereas the Purple Heart was established on August 7, 1782, during the 
        Revolutionary War, when General George Washington issued an order 
        establishing the Honorary Badge of Distinction, otherwise known as the 
        Badge of Military Merit;
Whereas the award of the Purple Heart ceased with the end of the Revolutionary 
        War, but was revived in 1932, the 200th anniversary of George 
        Washington's birth, out of respect for his memory and military 
        achievements; and
Whereas National Purple Heart Recognition Day is a fitting tribute to George 
        Washington and to the more than 1,535,000 recipients of the Purple 
        Heart, approximately 550,000 of whom are still living: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Purple Heart 
        Recognition Day;
            (2) encourages all people of the United States to learn 
        about the history of the Purple Heart and to honor its 
        recipients; and
            (3) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to conduct 
        appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate 
        support for people who have been awarded the Purple Heart.

            Passed the Senate July 28, 2005.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                     884
<SECURITIES>                                                55
<RECEIVABLES>                                              149
<ALLOWANCES>                                                21
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             0
<PP&E>                                                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           1,273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      226
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                               1,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             1,273
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         2,224
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          1,727
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      1,727
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                             1,727
<EPS-BASIC>                                             3.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Mark L. Weinstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.



|                         |  |                                       
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Mark L. Weinstein*                
|                         |  | Mark L. Weinstein, President and Chief
|                         |  | Executive Officer                     
|                         |  | (Principal Executive Officer)         

---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XIII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission of the Partnership's  Annual Report
on Form  10-K for the  period  ending  December  31,  2002 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
    respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
    Partnership.

Date: March 24, 2003                /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                    Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Board of Commissioners of Great Neck Park District of Town of North Hempstead, Respondent, v Kings Point Heights, LLC, Appellant.

Submitted February 7, 2011;

decided April 5, 2011

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
**Fuel Transport**

**For Agency Preparedness Review, you will need to have the following items available for review:**

**For Agency Preparedness Review, you will need to have the following items available for review:**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**Fire Extinguishers**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**Training**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**Drip Torches**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**Jerricans**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**Truck Bed Mounted Fuel Tank**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**Trailer Mounted Fuel Tank**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**T**

Checklist #19 - Fuel Transport	1	Revised June 2021

# image2.jpeg

# image1.jpg

# image3.png
No. 832.

#### Seago, Administratrix, *v.*New York Central Railroad Co.

February 2, 1942.

*Messrs. Mark D. Eagleton*and *William H. Allen*for petitioner. *Mr. Samuel W. Baxter*for respondent.

*Per Curiam:*

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed on the ground that there was sufficient evidence of negligence for submission to the jury. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Missouri for its consideration of other questions presented on the appeal and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2954 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to apply the ban 

on contributions and expenditures by foreign nationals to domestic corporations which are owned or controlled by foreign principals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2010 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

apply the ban on contributions and expenditures by foreign nationals to domestic corporations which are owned 

or controlled by foreign principals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prohibiting Foreign 

5 Influence in American Elections Act’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2954 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF BAN ON CONTRIBUTIONS AND EX2 PENDITURES BY FOREIGN NATIONALS TO 

3 FOREIGN-CONTROLLED DOMESTIC COR4 PORATIONS. 

5 Section 319(b) of the Federal Election Campaign Act 

6 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441e(b)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph 

8 (1); 

9 (2) by striking the period at the end of para10 graph (2) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(3) a corporation (other than a foreign prin14 cipal, as so defined) which is a subsidiary of a for15 eign principal, or with respect to which— 

16 ‘‘(A) one or more foreign principals serves 

17 on the board of directors, 

18 ‘‘(B) one or more foreign principals di19 rectly or indirectly has an ownership interest, or 

20 ‘‘(C) one or more foreign principals di21 rectly or indirectly holds debt or other obliga22 tions.’’. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 File Nos. 333-58100, 333-50432, 333-32834, 333-77007, 333-59051, 333-27499, 333-03806 and 33-90728) pertaining to the Credence Systems Corporation Supplemental Stock
Option Plan, 1993 Stock Option Plan, and the 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-38428) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan of TMT, Inc. (assumed by Credence Systems Corporation), (Form S-8 No. 333-69584) pertaining to the
1995 Stock Incentive Plan, 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the 2000 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan of Integrated Measurement Systems, Inc. (each assumed by Credence Systems
Corporation), and (Form S-8 No. 333-74346) pertaining to the Fluence Technology, Inc.1997 Stock Option Plan (assumed by Credence Systems Corporation), the Opmaxx, Inc. 1997 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan (assumed by Credence Systems Corporation),
the Credence Systems Corporation 1993 Stock Option Plan and the Credence Systems Corporation Supplemental Stock Option Plan, of our report dated November 22, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Credence
Systems Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 2002.





/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP





San Jose, California


January 28, 2003
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2777 

To repeal the American Recovery Capital loan program of the Small Business 

Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2009 

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To repeal the American Recovery Capital loan program of 

the Small Business Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AMERICAN RECOVERY CAPITAL 

4 LOAN PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 506 of division A of the 

6 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public 

7 Law 111–5; 123 Stat. 157) is repealed. 

8 (b) RETURN OF FUNDS.—Any unobligated balances 

9 of the amounts appropriated under the heading ‘‘BUSI10 NESS LOANS PROGRAM ACCOUNT’’ under the heading 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2777 IS

1 ‘‘SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION’’ under title 

2 V of division A of the American Recovery and Reinvest3 ment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–5; 123 Stat. 151) for 

4 loan subsidies and loan modifications for loans to small 

5 business concerns authorized in section 506 of division A 

6 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 

7 are rescinded. 

8 (c) APPLICABILITY.—Any loan guarantee under sec9 tion 506 of division A of the American Recovery and Rein10 vestment Act of 2009 entered into before the date of en11 actment of this Act, shall remain in full force and effect 

12 under the terms, and for the duration, of the loan guar13 antee. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS