alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                 406,671
<SECURITIES>                            0 
<RECEIVABLES>                           1,150
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        409,821
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          409,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   4,450
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                11,100,000
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            409,821
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        5,039
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            3,216
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0
        


</TABLE>
#### Dygert *against*Coppernoll.

Where,o£<jd formerea judgpiSntiG;prblfn| tof“ vent’4t obtf ‘{¡y Mentis5?ei a?aem.tnesseaand minutes of the' wtnehCIthere is an ambiguity as to the form of the action, the evidence of the justice is mad' miseibietoshow contractfntapfnh^possesston bitten S?ai cy|dence'Cof o

not admissible In á justice's tíonlomdedon tort.

IN ERROR, on *certiorari*to a justice^ court,

The defendant in error brought ah action of assumpsit in the' *conT^*below, against the plaintiff in error, in which the latter pleaded a former trial between the same parties, in which the defendant in error, the .plaintiff below, ought to have, set off the present demand. -The justice, before whom the former action was tried, appeared ás a witness, and produced his rninutes *%*-from which it appeared, that a judgment had. béen rendered in a suit of *Dygert*v. *Coppernoll,*stated thereon to be á plea of *trespass On the case,*but without specifying whether it were founded on *tort*or *contract;*he also stated that the original ' claration was m writing which he had left át home 5 arid, on its being proposed by the defendant below, that he should explain, from memory, what was the ground'of that action, in order to ascertain whether the set-off might .legally , have beef? made,tbe evidence, was overruled, and judgment given for the plain» tiff below.

*M‘Koun,*for the plaintiff in error»

Dodge, contra..

*Per Curiam.*

No set-off can be allowed,^except, it.be against a claim founded in con tract,, express .or implied. The, minutes.^ of the ‘ former judgment are equivocal and uncertain • as to the cause of action. , *Trespass on the case*may be for tort or contract; and, to explain that ambiguity, the written declaration. which the justice had left at home was the best evidence ; and, therefore,., the parol evidence to that point was properly excluded.,

The judgment ought to be affirmed.--
[948 NE2d 923, 924 NYS2d 317]

#### Joyce Henderson, Respondent, v Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Decided May 10, 2011

*887APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Office of Wallace D. Gossett,*Brooklyn *(Lawrence Heisler*of counsel), for appellants.

*Lipsig Shapey Manus & Moverman, P.C.,*New York City *(Jillian Rosen*of counsel), and *Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP,*New York City *(Brian J. Isaac*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Appellants failed to comply with the conditional or*888der. Therefore, the courts below did not err in striking appellants’ answer.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2694 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2694

To suspend temporarily the duty on Hexanedioic acid, polymer with N-(2-
 aminoethyl)-1,3-propanediamine, aziridine, (chloromethyl)oxirane, 1,2-
 ethanediamine, N,N-1,2-ethanediylbis(1,3-propanediamine), formic acid 
         and alpha-hydro-omega-hydroxypoly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on Hexanedioic acid, polymer with N-(2-
 aminoethyl)-1,3-propanediamine, aziridine, (chloromethyl)oxirane, 1,2-
 ethanediamine, N,N-1,2-ethanediylbis(1,3-propanediamine), formic acid 
         and alpha-hydro-omega-hydroxypoly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HEXANEDIOIC ACID, POLYMER WITH N-(2-AMINOETHYL)-1,3-
              PROPANEDIAMINE, AZIRIDINE, (CHLOROMETHYL)OXIRANE, 1,2-
              ETHANEDIAMINE, N,N-1,2-ETHANEDIYLBIS(1,3-PROPANEDIAMINE), 
              FORMIC ACID AND ALPHA-HYDRO-OMEGA-HYDROXYPOLY(OXY-1,2-
              ETHANEDIYL).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Hexanedioic acid,   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        polymer with N-(2-                                                 31/2011.......
                        aminoethyl)-1,3-
                        propanediamine,
                        aziridine,
                        (chloromethyl)oxi
                        rane, 1,2-
                        ethanediamine,
                        N,N-1,2-
                        ethanediylbis(1,3-
                        propanediamine),
                        formic acid and
                        alpha-hydro-omega-
                        hydroxypoly(oxy-
                        1,2-ethanediyl)
                        (CAS No. 114133-
                        44-7) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        3911.90.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 24.2

                                 CERTIFICATE
                                 -----------

         I, Steven L. Frey, hereby certify that I am Secretary of Angelica
Corporation, a Missouri company, with its principal office in the County of
St. Louis, State of Missouri, and as such in charge of its corporate records,
including minutes of meetings of its shareholders and Board of Directors.

         I further certify that the Board of Directors of the Company adopted
the following resolutions under date of March 27, 2001, which resolutions
have not since been amended or rescinded and are in full force and effect at
the date hereof:

                  "FURTHER RESOLVED, That Don W. Hubble, T. M. Armstrong and
         James W. Shaffer, or any of them, are hereby authorized to do all
         acts and things and to execute any and all instruments on behalf of
         the Company, including the execution of the Company's Annual Report
         on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 27, 2001, or any
         amendment thereto, relating to compliance with the reporting
         requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which said
         attorneys, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable to enable
         the Company to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
         any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and
         Exchange Commission in respect thereof;

                  FURTHER RESOLVED, That this Board of Directors does approve
         the execution by the directors and officers of the Company or any of
         them, of a Power of Attorney in favor of Don W. Hubble, T. M.
         Armstrong and James W. Shaffer, or any of them (with power of
         substitution in each), empowering such attorneys, or any of them, to
         do all acts and things and to execute any and all instruments on
         behalf of such directors and officers, including the execution of
         the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
         January 27, 2001 and all amendments thereto, which such attorneys,
         or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable to enable the
         Company to comply with the reporting requirements of the Securities
         and Exchange Commission in respect thereof."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal
of the said corporation this 24th day of April, 2001.


                                           /s/ Steven L. Frey
                                           ------------------------------------
                                                        Secretary
[SEAL]
POWI-EX10.1_2022.6.30_Q2

​

 
Exhibit 10.1
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
​
LETTER AGREEMENT RE: EXECUTIVE OFFICER BENEFITS AGREEMENT
​
This Letter Agreement Re: Executive Officer Benefits Agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) is made and entered into as of August 1, 2022 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Power Integrations, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the “Company”) and Sunil Gupta (“Executive”).
Whereas, Executive is an executive officer of the Company and possesses valuable knowledge of the Company, its business and operations, and the markets in which the Company competes, and the Company desires to supplement Executive’s employment arrangements so as to provide additional benefits to the Executive to encourage Executive to continue to devote his attention and dedication to the Company and its business.
Whereas, the Company and Executive previously entered into an Executive Officer Benefits Agreement by and between the Company and Executive, dated February 1, 2021 (the “EOBA”).
Now, Therefore, in consideration of the mutual agreements, covenants and considerations contained herein, the undersigned hereby agree and acknowledge that, notwithstanding the definition of “Senior Executive” set forth in the EOBA, for the purposes of the EOBA Executive is hereby deemed a “Senior Executive” thereunder as of the Effective Date.
In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have executed this Letter Agreement, intending to be legally bound as of the Effective Date.
	COMPANY:
​
	Power Integrations, Inc.
By: /s/ BALU BALAKRISHNAN
Name: Balu Balakrishnan
Title:   President and CEO
​

	​
	​

	EXECUTIVE:
​
​
​
	​
 /s/ SUNIL GUPTA
Sunil Gupta
​



​

​
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2954 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2954

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to apply the ban on 
    contributions and expenditures by foreign nationals to domestic 
   corporations which are owned or controlled by foreign principals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2010

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to apply the ban on 
    contributions and expenditures by foreign nationals to domestic 
   corporations which are owned or controlled by foreign principals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prohibiting Foreign Influence in 
American Elections Act''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF BAN ON CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES BY FOREIGN 
              NATIONALS TO FOREIGN-CONTROLLED DOMESTIC CORPORATIONS.

    Section 319(b) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 
U.S.C. 441e(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (1);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (2) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) a corporation (other than a foreign principal, as so 
        defined) which is a subsidiary of a foreign principal, or with 
        respect to which--
                    ``(A) one or more foreign principals serves on the 
                board of directors,
                    ``(B) one or more foreign principals directly or 
                indirectly has an ownership interest, or
                    ``(C) one or more foreign principals directly or 
                indirectly holds debt or other obligations.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Damian Gardner, Appellant.

Submitted November 29, 2010;

decided December 14, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
2024 Daniels Switch Settings

2024 Daniels Switch Settings

2024 Daniels Switch Settings

2024 Daniels Switch Settings

2024 Daniels Switch Settings

2024 Daniels Switch Settings

2024 Daniels Switch Settings

2024 Daniels Switch Settings

2024 Daniels Switch Settings

2024 Daniels Switch Settings

2024 Daniels Switch Settings

- 4248-UHF Repeater Switch Settings (E-Model)
- 4248-UHF Repeater Switch Settings
- 4312-VHF Repeater Switch Settings (E-Model)
- 4312-VHF Repeater/Link Switch Settings (E-Model)
- 4312-VHF Repeater Switch Settings
- 4312-VHF Repeater/Link Switch Settings
- 4370-AC Radio Base Switch Settings
- 4370-AC Radio/Link Switch Settings
- 4370-AC Radio Base Switch Settings (E-Model)
- 4370-AC Radio/Link Switch Settings (E-Model)
- 4281-Crossband Link Switch Settings
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Debra Pagan, Appellant.

Submitted April 4, 2011;

decided April 28, 2011

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., the Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1997
<CASH>                                            1000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |     |  |                                         
|------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|March 6, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Marliss D. Johnson                  
|              |  |     |  | Vice President, Controller and Treasurer
|              |  |     |  | Marliss D. Johnson
#### State v. McAdams

Case below: 178 N.C. App. 393

No. 416P06

1. Def’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA05-992)

2. AG’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. _

2. Allowed 01/25/07

3. Denied 01/25/07

Hudson, J. Recused
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT J ul y Term 2014

PALM BEACH PARK CENTRE 4, LLC ,

Appellant,

v.

TOWN OF PALM BEACH ,

Appellee

.

No. 4D 13

- 1993

[ July 16, 2014 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Edward H. Fine , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502013CA003051XX

.
Raymond M. Masciarella II, North Palm Beach, for appellant.

Kelly A. Gardner, John C. Randolph and Stephanie Eassa Rapp of Jones, Foster, Johnston & Stubbs, P.A., West Pal m Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
We affirm the circuit court’s final order dismissing with prejudice appellant’s amended complaint for declaratory relief a gainst the appellee

. See Frix v. Beck , 104 So. 2d 81, 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958) (where the law provides for a quasi

- judicial tribunal’s decision to be reviewed on appeal,

“ and the procedure thus afforded is not availed of, a party adversely affected by such an order may not seek to have it altered or reversed by a suit for declaratory decree ”). Our affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to petition appellee for relief. See Johnson v. Terry Hunt Const r

. Co
., 878 So. 2d 1282 , 1284

- 85 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (reversing administrative order denying relief where administrative final order had not bee n mailed to the correct address) ; Durando v. Palm Beach C nty

. , 719 So. 2d 1258 , 1258

- 59 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (dismissing untimely appeal without prejudice to appellant’ s right to petition agency for reli ef)

.
Affirmed without prejudice

.

G ROSS , G ERBER and C ONNER , JJ., con cur

.2 * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11709 and #11710]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-1830-DR), dated 04/10/2009.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         03/16/2009 and continuing through 05/22/2009.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         05/22/2009.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/09/2009.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/11/2010.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Minnesota, dated 04/10/2009 is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 03/16/2009 and continuing through 05/22/2009.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Roger B. Garland,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-13031 Filed 6-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P