alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           553,567
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           45,341
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             46,825
<EQUITIES>                                          19
<MORTGAGE>                                     156,313
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   47,224
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 834,740
<CASH>                                         287,627
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             167,176
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          35,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,554,048
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                432,005
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             26,291
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 304,329
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 76,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          184,771
<PREFERRED>                                     15,623
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     298,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,554,048
<PREMIUMS>                                     719,251
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             50,348
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               5,142
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  57,442
<BENEFITS>                                     539,689
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     11,580
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             3,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 44,946
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,824
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,053
<DISCONTINUED>                                   5,693
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel. Animal Models of Infectious Diseases 1.                    

*Date:*                         June 29-July 1, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 7 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Crowne Plaza—Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Tracy A. Shahan, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, NIH/NIAID/DHHS, Room 3121, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616,                               ( print page 27155)                            Bethesda, MD 20892-7616. 301-451-2606.                         *tshahan@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 1, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-13285 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                 |                                                 |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |                            |                                            |
| Date: November              9, 2006 | By:                        | /s/ David              L.              Weinberg |
|                                     | David              L. Weinberg       |
|                                     | Chief              Financial Officer |

----
[944 NE2d 1119, 919 NYS2d 480]

#### Gretchen Rivera, an Infant by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Maria Rivera, et al., Appellants, v Paul G. Kleinman, M.D., et al., Respondents.

Argued January 4, 2011;

decided February 15, 2011

*758APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Pagan Law Firm, P.C.,*New York City *(Tania M. Pagan*of counsel), for appellants.

*McAloon & Friedman, P.C.,*New York City *(Gina B. Di Folco*of counsel), for Paul G. Kleinman, M.D. and another, respondents.

*Garbarini & Scher, P.C.,*New York City *(William D. Buckley*of counsel), for St. Barnabas Hospital and others, respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Infant plaintiff was born in October 1995 with cerebral palsy and spastic quadriplegia. In March 2003, defendant doctor operated on the infant’s right and left hips, which had both dislocated as a consequence of her maladies. These surgeries, performed two weeks apart, entailed cutting and repositioning the bones that join at the hip and fixing them with a plate (with side screws) and a hip screw. This hardware was to be removed later, after the bones healed. In August 2005, plaintiff mother, on the infant’s behalf and individually, sued the doctor and defendant hospital for medical malpractice with respect to the March 2003 surgeries. She ultimately focused on a claim that *759the doctor had improperly positioned the screw implanted in the infant’s left hip, causing pain and suffering. This screw eventually broke through the infant’s skin and was taken out during emergency surgery in December 2006. Supreme Court granted the doctor’s motion and the hospital’s cross motion seeking summary judgment to dismiss the complaint. The Appellate Division affirmed (67 AD3d 482 [1st Dept 2009]), and so do we. In response to defendants’ prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, plaintiffs’ expert did not raise an issue of fact as to any departure from good and accepted practice in the doctor’s treatment of the infant (including the two surgeries); and did not demonstrate any causal connection between the doctor’s alleged departures from good and accepted practice in placing the hip screw in the infant’s left hip and the injuries claimed to have been suffered on account of the hardware’s delayed removal.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7774

NICHOLAS WARNER JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD MURPHY; ROBERT C. MILLER, ROBERT A.

CLAYTON, M.D.; E. G. ELIAS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

ROY WHITEHOUSE, Regional Administrator; ROBERT

GRANGER; RONALD JONES, Physician Assistant;

JANE DOE, Registered Nurse; JOHN DOE,

Physician Assistant; JAMES WRIGHT, Health

Services Administrator; SCOTT D. CORLEW, M.D.;

BRYON K. BARTLE, M.D.; ALLEASE SLOAN; NAVZAT

TURKMAN,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge.

(CA-91-1166-K)

Submitted: May 29, 1998 Decided: June 30, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nicholas Warner Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Carol A. Zuckerman,

WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton

Andrews, KRAMON & GRAHAM, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Nicholas Jones appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants Ronald Jones, Robert A. Clayton,

Allease Sloan, Nevzat Turkman, Scott D. Corlew, Bryon K. Bartle,

and E.G. Elias in an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994), and granting summary judgment on all allegations except as

to the claim of inadequate medical treatment for suture wire

remaining in Jones’s abdomen following hernia surgery. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm primarily on the reasoning

of the district court. Jones v. Murphy, No. CA-91-1166-K (D. Md.

July 22, 1992). We further grant Defendant Clayton’s and Elias’s

motion and memorandum to strike Jones’s Reply to the Informal Brief

filed by Defendants. We also deny as moot the motion of Roy Whitehouse and Robert Granger to dismiss the case as to them. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Francisco B. LOPEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan JOSLIN, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, Seagoville, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-10214

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2006.

Francisco Lopez, Seagoville, TX, pro se.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Francisco B. Lopez, federal prisoner # 56053-079, appeals the district court’s *467denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged the way the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is crediting the time he has served on a 72-month federal sentence and a 240-month federal sentence. Lopez argues that the BOP should back date the commencement of his 240-month sentence to coincide with the date he began serving his 72-month sentence. He contends that because the offenses are related, he can serve no more than the 240-month sentence imposed as a result of his second conviction. He argues that by refusing to credit the time he has served on his 72-month sentence toward the service of his 240-month sentence, his' punishment for those offenses is being illegally cumulated.

To the extent that Lopez attempts to raise claims cognizable in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, the district court was without jurisdiction to entertain them. *See*§ 2255. Accordingly, Lopez is not entitled to relief based on those claims.

With regard to his remaining claims, Lopez has not shown that the district court erred by denying his § 2241 petition. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3585(a) & (b). Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *467published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gordon F. Burley, Chief Executive Officer of Terrace Ventures
  Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                             

| | By:    | /s/ Gordon F. Burley    | 
| | ------ | ----------------------- | 
| |        |                         | 
| | Name:  | GORDON F. BURLEY        | 
| |        |                         | 
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer | 
| |        |                         | 
| | Date:  | September 19, 2005      | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and
  will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
  relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
  is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under
  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
  language contained in such filing.

---
#### Henok HABTEMICHAEL-SHIFERAW, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-2119.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 28, 2009.

Decided: May 26, 2009.

Aragaw Mehari, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Paul T. Cygnarowicz, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henok Habtemichael-Shiferaw, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for relief from removal.

Habtemichael-Shiferaw challenges the determination that he failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Habtemichael-Shiferaw fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, he cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *Chen v. INS,*195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir.1999); *INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca,*480 U.S. 421, 430, 107 S.Ct. 1207, 94 L.Ed.2d 434 (1987). Finally, we uphold the finding below that Habtemichael-Shiferaw failed to demonstrate that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured if removed to Ethiopia. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2008).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,888
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                       550
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,831
<PP&E>                                          17,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,822
<BONDS>                                          6,444
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,485
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,370
<SALES>                                        439,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               439,546
<CGS>                                          340,483
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  340,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                72,848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,210
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,829
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,381
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,381
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09
        

</TABLE>
****
****

**NATIONAL INTERAGENCY FIRE CENTER**

**CASUAL PAYMENT CENTER**

**A SERVICE FIRST ORGANIZATION**

   CASUAL PAYMENT CENTER MS 270 

3833 S DEVELOPMENT AVE BOISE, ID 83705-5354

PHONE:  877-471-2262      FAX:  208-433-6405

****

**Conditional Offer of**

**Federal Employee Health Benefits Form**

**Check one:     |_| BIA        |_| BLM        |_| FWS        |_| NPS**

...................................................................................................................................................

As an Administratively Determined Emergency Worker (AD/Casual), you will be eligible for Federal Employee Health Benefits (FEHB) when you work 130 hours per month for 90 consecutive days. This coverage includes a 31 day extension of FEHB following employment termination.

More information about the FEHB program is available on the OPM website: https://www.opm.gov/healthcare-insurance/healthcare/plan-information/plans/.

As an****AD/Casual, I understand that if I work 130 hours per month for 90 days, I am eligible for FEHB coverage.  

|_|   I **elect** FEHB upon meeting the above eligibility criteria.  

|_|   I **decline** coverage in a Federal Employee Health Benefits plan.

*****I understand if at any time I choose to receive more information, I can contact the Casual Payment Center.***

...................................................................................................................................................

**By signing below, I attest I am the person named above and I have read and understand the information presented.**

**SIGNATURE:  DATE:**

*Privacy Act Statement: Information on this form is collected under the authority of the Administratively Determined (AD) Pay Plan. Information collected via this form is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974 and Privacy Act System of Records Notice DOI-85. The primary use of this information is to start, stop, or change entitlements and to process any voluntary or involuntary deductions on pay and leave issues. The information you furnish will be used to identify records properly associated with you, to obtain additional information to update your record, if necessary, and to determine any present or future entitlement. Disclosure may be made only to authorized persons according to Title 5 USC 552a and for uses described in System of Records Notices DOI-85. Submission of the information in this form is voluntary; however, requests will not be completed without the information needed to process the request.*

*Revised 01/2022*

# image1.gif

# image2.png