alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Casual Payment 

Center 2022 

Annual Report

NATIONAL INTERAGENCTY FIRE CENTER

Department of Interior
Mission statement

The principal mission of the CASUAL PAYMENT 

CENTER (CPC) is the delivery of excellent customer 

service in the cost effective and prompt processing 

of payment of casual/AD hires for the Bureau of 

Indian Affairs (BIA), the Bureau of Land Management 

(BLM), the National Park Service (NPS), and the Fish 

and Wildlife Service (FWS).

20XX Contoso business plan 2
Costs

Usability

Department of Interior

Agency Agency Desc All Hzd 

C d

Casual 

Count

Payment 

Count

Amt Gross Col 

Tot

Amt Travel 

Reimburse Col 

Tot

POV Mileage Amt Boot 

Stipend

Amount Gross Total

IN05 BLM C 1,130 4,947 $15,229,020.53 $102,010.40 $18,033.66 $60,621.00 $15,409,685.59

IN05 BLM H 89 89 $395,787.06 $5,130.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400,917.06

BLM Total 1,219 5,036 $15,624,807.59 $107,140.40 $18,033.66 $60,621.00 $15,810,602.65

IN06 BIA C 1,041 4,248 $10,303,375.16 $124,341.50 $2,062.98 $80,995.00 $10,510,774.64

IN06 BIA H 18 18 $77,037.04 $2,440.00 $0.00 $0.00 $79,477.04

BIA Total 1,059 4,266 $10,380,412.20 $126,781.50 $2,062.98 $80,995.00 $10,590,251.68

IN10 NPS C 322 1,107 $4,218,477.93 $3,643.50 $942.28 $23,547.00 $4,246,610.71

IN10 NPS H 367 883 $412,627.41 $90.00 $0.00 $0.00 $412,717.41

NPS Total 689 1,990 $4,631,105.34 $3,733.50 $942.28 $23,547.00 $4,659,328.12

IN15 FWS C 262 603 $1,430,210.39 $787.50 $464.14 $23,881.00 $1,455,343.03

IN15 FWS H 21 30 $123,352.05 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $123,352.05

FWS Total 283 633 $1,553,562.44 $787.50 $464.14 $23,881.00 $1,578,695.08

Grand 

Total

 3,250 11,925 $32,189,887.57 $238,442.90 $21,503.06 $189,044.00 $32,638,877.53

2022 CALENDAR YEAR STATISTICS
Agency Breakdowns

4
July 20XX

20XX Contoso business plan 5

5-Year Average 2018-2022

Department of Interior

Agency Desc Number 

of 

Casuals

Amount Gross 

Total

Casual 

Payments 

Processed

Payment 

Percentage

BLM Total 1,490 $15,661,867.62 5,649 41%

BIA Total 1,295 $11,713,201.45 5,279 39%

NPS Total 604 $4,101,590.38 1,918 14%

FWS Total 399 $1,771,881.92 811 6%

Grand Total 3,788 $33,248,541.37 13,657 100%
Our Staff consists of:

GS employees (4)

Contractors (4-6)

ADs (4-6)

20XX 6

2023

Department of Interior
CPC Updates

CPC has converted its filing to a 

100% electronic filing system. 

Weekly all payroll documents are 

uploaded into DOI’s ECS platform 

where they will be maintained for 

seven years.

Our office continues to prepare 

BLM NERV Payment Invoices for 

payment by the NOC.

The CPC processed over 7,000 

BLM BIL and Non-BIL awards the 

3

rd and 4th quarters of the 

calendar year.

Department of Interior 7
8

Thank you
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00475-CV

ESTATE OF MARY LAVERNE 

BOORTZ, DECEASED

----------

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF HOOD COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Mary Denise Langwell attempts to appeal the trial court’s July 

25, 2011 order removing her as independent executrix of the Estate of Mary 

Laverne Boortz. Appellant timely filed a request for findings of fact and 

conclusions of law, extending the deadline for filing the notice of appeal until 

October 24, 2011. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(4); Tex. R. Civ. P. 306c. But 

appellant did not file a notice of appeal until November 14, 2011, and there is no 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

evidence that she mailed her notice of appeal during the time for filing a motion 

to extend. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b), 26.3.

On November 17, 2011, we sent appellant a letter expressing our concern 

that we lack jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was untimely filed. See

Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 26.1; Crites v. Collins, 284 S.W.3d 839, 840 (Tex. 2009)

(indicating that the timely filing of a notice of appeal under rule 26.1 is 

jurisdictional). We informed appellant that unless she or any party desiring to 

continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, 

this appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant filed a 

response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal.

Because appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss the appeal 

for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 22, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3099 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 403
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3099

                          [Report No. 111-195]

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the American Falls Reservoir.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2010

 Mr. Risch (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                              May 24, 2010

              Reported by Mr. Bingaman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the American Falls Reservoir.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT INVOLVING AMERICAN FALLS RESERVOIR.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12423, the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the 
licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in accordance 
with the procedures of the Commission under that section, reinstate the 
license and extend the time period during which the licensee is 
required to commence the construction of project works to the end of 
the 3-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                                       Calendar No. 403

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3099

                          [Report No. 111-195]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the American Falls Reservoir.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 24, 2010

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2761 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2761

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the bonus 
 depreciation deduction applicable to the Gulf Opportunity Zone for 2 
                           additional years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 10, 2009

  Mr. Wicker (for himself, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Vitter, and Ms. Landrieu) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the bonus 
 depreciation deduction applicable to the Gulf Opportunity Zone for 2 
                           additional years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``GO Zone Bonus Depreciation Extension 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF BONUS DEPRECIATION DEDUCTION APPLICABLE TO THE 
              GULF OPPORTUNITY ZONE FOR 2 ADDITIONAL YEARS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (6) of section 1400N(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``2010'' each place it 
appears and inserting ``2012''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Biography

National Indian Gaming Commission

PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGER 

MARY PARKER

Mary Parker is the Public Affairs Manager for the National Indian Gaming 

Commission, an independent federal regulatory agency established within the 

Department of the Interior. In this position, Parker is responsible for national policy, 

planning, management and evaluation of communication programs encompassing 

media engagement, internal information, external relations, social media platforms and 

legislative affairs.

Prior to this role Parker was the Management and Programs Analyst for the NIGC and 

Instructional Systems Specialist. She continues to grow and shape each role she has 

taken on and focuses her work on creating a foundation for the agency to establish 

effective communication, messaging and outreach to the agency’s stakeholders. Prior 

to her role within the NIGC, Parker served as the first Compliance trainer for 

Cherokee Nation Entertainment where her focus was designing, developing and 

implementing regulatory compliance training for all casino employees. She worked for 

her tribe for 7 years before joining the agency.

In 2020, Parker was named to the National Center for American Indian Enterprise 

Development’s 40 Under 40 and was also awarded the Emerging Leaders of Gaming recognition by Global Gaming 

Business magazine. 

In 2021, Parker was name as an Achiever Under 40, by the Journal Record Magazine located out of Oklahoma City.

A native of Tahlequah Oklahoma, Parker received her bachelor’s degree in Psychology, Mental Health from 

Northeastern State University in 2006. She earned her master’s degree in Administrative Leadership from the 

University of Oklahoma in 2017. She is currently in the doctoral program for Instructional Systems Design and 

Technology from Sam Houston State University. Parker is also a certified online professional trainer (COPT). 

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act created the National Indian Gaming Commission to support tribal self-sufficiency and the integrity of Indian gaming. 

NIGC oversees the efficient regulation of more than 500 gaming establishments operated by 250 tribes across 29 states.

Updated 1/29/2024
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
      best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/  Steve
      Westlund


Steve
      Westlund


Chief
      Executive Officer, President


and
      Chief
      Accounting Officer


August
      17, 2007
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                CERTIFICATION

I, John N. Hanna certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of YoCream
International, Inc. (the small business issuer);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (small business issuers fourth quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
controls over financial reporting.


/s/ John N. Hanna                                    Dated:  March 17, 2005
-----------------
John N. Hanna, Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# Agency:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# Action:

Notice; location change.

# SUMMARY:

                        The location for the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation Board of Visitors meeting scheduled for June 18, 2009 that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Tuesday, June 2, 2009 (74 FR 26378) has changed. The meeting will now be held at the Rayburn House Office Building, HR 2212, Washington, DC.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

WHINSEC Board of Visitors Secretariat at (703) 614-1452.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-13441 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Frank J. LEPERE.

No. CR No. 83-308-T.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Feb. 27, 1985.

*376Janis M. Berry, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Criminal Narcotics Task Force, Boston, Mass., for the United States.

Martin G. Weinberg, Oteri, Weinberg & Lawson, Boston, Mass., for defendant.

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TAURO, District Judge.

On February 26, 1985, the Court of Appeals issued the following order:

> Because of this court’s uncertainty as to whether the district court interpreted the relevant statutory presumption as this court interpreted it in the subsequently decided case of *United States of America v. Mark Jessup,*— F.2d —, No. 84-1983 (1st Cir. February 25, 1985), we vacate the district court’s order and remand this case for reconsideration in light of *Jessup.*

In response, this court advises that it did interpret the relevant statutory presumption in accordance with the subsequently decided case of *United States of America v. Mark Jessup.*In order to resolve any ambiguity on that score, this court amends the last paragraphs of its memorandum and order of December 19, 19841 as follows:

The court is persuaded that Congress intended to impose on persons charged with major drug offenses the burden of producing evidence that would rebut the statutory presumption that they pose a significant risk of flight or danger to the community. Absent the statutory presumption, defendant’s proposed conditions of release might satisfy the court that he presents a reasonable bail risk. The defendant’s proposal, however, is not sufficient to counterbalance the additional factor presented by the statutory presumption established in the Bail Reform Act. In other words, because of that presumption, the government has met its burden of persuasion.2

For the reasons stated herein, defendant’s motion to revoke the Magistrate’s detention order is hereby denied.

1

. 599 F.Supp. 1322 (D.Mass.1984).

2

. This paragraph previously read:

> The court is persuaded that Congress intended by its statutory presumption to raise the threshold that persons charged with major drug offenses must meet in order to establish that they do not pose a significant risk of flight or danger to the community. Thus, while the defendant’s proposed conditions and proffered property might otherwise satisfy the court that he poses a reasonable risk of flight, the defendant’s proposal does not satisfy the new statutory burden regarding flight. Nor does it rebut the presumption of dangerousness. [footnote omitted]
No. 953.

#### Princeton Knitting Mills, Inc. *v.*Arcadia Knitting Mills, Inc.

March 16, 1942.

*Messrs. W. Hastings Swenarton*and *Benjamin Jaffe*for petitioner. *Mr. Herman Seid*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             667
<SECURITIES>                                 1,276,402
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,299,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,889
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,276,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,299,690
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,737
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,737
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,737
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000822658
<NAME>                        Whitney American Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          95,354
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (95,355)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               26,375
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (26,375)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (26,375)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (26,375)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26,375)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>