alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        REDHOOK ALE BREWERY, INCORPORATED
                 FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Operating Officer of Redhook Ale Brewery, Incorporated, a Washington corporation
(the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form
10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-K").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2005



                                       BY:   /s/  David J. Mickelson
                                          --------------------------------------
                                              David J. Mickelson
                                              Executive Vice President,
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              and Chief Operating Officer
No. —, original.

#### Ex parte John St. Francis Slaughter; and Ex parte Pedro E. Sanchez Tapia.

No. —, original.

March 30, 1942.

The motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.
6. Section Headings. The various headings of this Amendment are insertedfor convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation ofthis amendment or the Agreement or any provision hereof or thereof.[SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
 

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly signed by theparties as of the date set forth above.         COFINA FUNDING, LLC as Issuer           By:              Name:              Title:           
 

 
         VOYAGER FUNDING CORPORATION as    Conduit Purchaser           By:              Name:              Title:                    BANK HAPOALIM B.M.    as Funding Agent           By:              Name:              Title:                    By:              Name:              Title:           
 

 
         M & I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK,    as a Committed Purchaser    Purchaser Percentage: 25%           By:              Name:              Title:           
 

 
         THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI UFJ,    LTD., NEW YORK BRANCH    Purchaser Percentage: 75%           By:              Name:              Title:
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHS Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, John D. Johnson, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.     /s/ John D. Johnson           John D. Johnson *President and Chief Executive Officer*April 11, 2005
#### American Tower Asset Sub, LCC, et al., Respondents, v Buffalo-Lake Erie Wireless Systems, Co., LLC, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 917]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered August 3, 2012. The order, among other things, granted the motion of plaintiffs for partial summary judgment dismissing the first counterclaim and denied the cross motion of defendant for partial summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court. Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Garni, Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - VI A (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General
Partner and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of the
              operations of the Partnership.


           November 14, 2008                    /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
           -----------------                    --------------------
                 Date                           Joseph M. Jayson,
                                                Individual General Partner and
                                                Principal Financial Officer
**Suggested UAS Twitter and Facebook Posts**

· Know Before You Fly Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)! Visit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06pz4GW7mY0

· Know how to fly your UAS on public lands. Visit  http://knowbeforeyoufly.org/

· The FAA regulates the use of UAS. Fly yours safely: http://knowbeforeyoufly.org/

· Unauthorized unmanned aircraft system flights threaten firefighter safety and hinder fire suppression efforts. https://www.nifc.gov/drones/index.html

· Drones can be dangerous if flown near a wildfire. Fly responsibly! https://youtu.be/KVl8UJEAIZI

· Ensure your UAS excursion doesn’t become a deadly incursion.  Please, don’t fly near wildfires. https://youtu.be/06pz4GW7mY0

· Unmanned aircraft should stay well away from manned aircraft, especially low-flying aircraft and helicopters. http://knowbeforeyoufly.org/

· Even the sky has limits. Learn the Unmanned Aircraft Systems laws. http://knowbeforeyoufly.org/learn-the-drone-laws

**Suggested graphics to use with posts. Graphics can be found at:****https://www.nifc.gov/drones/outreach.html******

****

# image1.tiff

# image2.jpeg

# image3.tiff

# image4.jpg
Supreme Court ofthe United States

Office ofthe Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

April 27, 2015

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202)479-3011

Clerk

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District

600 Commerce Street

Dallas, TX 75202-4658

Re: Jesse Cole

v. Generations Adoptions, et al.

No. 14-1024

(Your No. 05-12-00919-CV)

Dear Clerk:

CL£RK^oiiTRlCTAPR 30 2015

"*«* 5ft osr.

20/5

CLEf*. 5th 0/S71R/cr

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk
••••••Pi

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

WASHINGTON, DC 20543-0001

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE S300

B«m

752G2S&&3X CGG4 ^tfllll,»»llll,llll,,Il"ll»l|i«,,llH
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 106 (Thursday, June 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13077]



[[Page 26866]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; HIT Policy Committee Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the second meeting of the HIT Policy 
Committee in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

DATES: HIT Policy Committee meeting on June 16, 2009, from 10 a.m. to 1 
p.m. [Eastern Time].

ADDRESSES: HIT Policy Committee Meeting, Hubert H. Humphrey Building 
(200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 
505A. Please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://healthit.hhs.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will include presentations from 
the HIT Policy Committee Workgroups. Space is limited, and seating is 
on a first-come, first-served basis. The meeting will be available via 
Web cast. If you have special needs for the meeting, please contact 
(202) 690-7151.

    Dated: June 1, 2009.
Judith Sparrow,
Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator 
for Health Information Technology.
[FR Doc. E9-13077 Filed 6-1-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4150-45-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Omar C. Richards, Appellant.

[977 NYS2d 68]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Firetog, J.), dated July 9, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level one sexually violent offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the *686defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Feivish,*105 AD3d 724 [2013]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Dillon, J.E, Angiolillo, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
#### Victor Batshever et al., Appellants, v Jafar Jafar et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 14, 2011;

decided March 31, 2011

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*16 NY3d 731 (2011)].
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                          135,716
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  135,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           95,564
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      40,152
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    135,716
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                5,825
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   47,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (41,787)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41039

Conference Calendar

 

JEFFERY ELGIN CRUMEDY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:95-CV-438

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jeffery Elgin Crumedy, Texas prisoner # 612356, appeals the

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition seeking credit towards

his federal sentence for time served in state custody. The

petition was proper under § 2241 because Crumedy is challenging

the execution of his federal sentence. See United States v.

Cleto, 956 F.2d 83, 84 (5th Cir. 1992). Because his petition was

filed before the enactment of the Antiterrorism and Effective

Death Penalty Act, neither a certificate of probable cause nor a 
No. 97-41039

-2-

certificate of appealability is required. See Green v. Johnson,

116 F.3d 1115, 1119-20 (5th Cir. 1997); Ojo v. INS, 106 F.3d 680,

681-82 (5th Cir. 1997).

Crumedy is, however, required to exhaust administrative

remedies before proceeding. See United States v. Wilson, 503

U.S. 329, 335 (1992); United States v. Dowling, 962 F.2d 390, 393

(5th Cir. 1992). The Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) determined that

Crumedy’s claim was premature because it will not calculate

Crumedy’s sentence, including any credit for time served, until

he reports for federal custody. See Wilson, 503 U.S. at 334-35. 

Since his sentence has not yet been calculated, Crumedy’s § 2241

petition is likewise premature. Additionally, his claim for

credit appears to be without merit on its face. See Savage v.

Henderson, 475 F.2d 78, 79 (5th Cir. 1973). The district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.
Document

Execution Version

Counterpart to Registration Rights Agreement
The undersigned hereby absolutely, unconditionally and irrevocably agrees as a Guarantor (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 15, 2022 by and among Magallanes, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC) to be bound by the terms and provisions of such Registration Rights Agreement.











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this counterpart as of April 8, 2022.


WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY, INC.
By /s/ Fraser Woodford___________ 
Name: Fraser Woodford
Title: Executive Vice President, Treasury and Corporate Finance


DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
By /s/ Fraser Woodford___________
Name: Fraser Woodford
Title: Executive Vice President, Treasury and Corporate Finance


SCRIPPS NETWORKS INTERACTIVE, INC.
By /s/ Fraser Woodford___________  
Name: Fraser Woodford
Title: Executive Vice President, Treasury and Corporate Finance
Human Resources Advisory Number: 002 

Subject: Supplemental Qualification Standard for GS-401- Fire Management 

 Specialist 

Effective Date: September 3, 2003 

This HR Advisory transmits additional guidance for Fire Management Specialist, GS-401 

qualification requirements. The Supplemental Qualifications Standard for Fire Management 

Specialist, GS-401 was developed under the sponsorship of the Department of Interior (DOI) 

Policy Office and the Federal Fire and Aviation Leadership Council. The Council was 

composed of representatives from Bureau of Land Management (BLM), National Park Service 

(NPS), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), the Forest Service and 

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). The supplemental qualification standard has 

been approved and released for immediate use by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 

for DOI and USDA. The goal of the standard is to ensure consistent application in qualifying 

and hiring employees for key fire management specialist positions in these agencies. The 

standard is to be used for noncompetitive actions involving reassignment and selection from 

another two-graded interval position or for competitive actions. 

The attachments that accompany this HR Advisory are to be utilized in the implementation of 

this standard. Attachment 1 is the new Fire Management Specialist standard; Attachment 2 

provides information on the basic requirements and specialized experience needed to qualify via 

the new standard; and Attachment 3 provides a list of creditable courses from other than an 

accredited university or college that can be used to satisfy the educational requirement. The new 

standard is in effect and should be implemented immediately. 

Attachment 

J. Lynn Smith 

Assistant Director, Human Resources 

Inquiries: Contact your servicing Human Resources Office 

Distribution: Human Resources Managers 

Human Resources Office National Park Service 

1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.55
                                                                   -------------



                                Amendment No. 3
                                    to the
                         1995 Stock Incentive Plan of
                                 AMETEK, Inc.

          WHEREAS, AMETEK, Inc. (the "Corporation") has adopted the 1995 Stock
Incentive Plan of AMETEK, Inc. (the "Plan"); and

          WHEREAS, Section 19 of the Plan permits the Corporation to amend the
Plan; and

          WHEREAS, the Corporation now desires to amend the Plan in certain
respects;

          NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

          1.  The first sentence of Section 13 of the Plan is amended to read,
in its entirety, as follows:

          "If a holder of an Option and/or Rights shall voluntarily or
involuntarily leave the employ of the Corporation and its Affiliates, the Option
and Rights of such holder shall terminate forthwith, except that the holder
shall have until the expiration of 3 months (3 business days in the case of
Incentive Stock Options granted before November 20, 1996)from the cessation of
the holder's employment with the Corporation and its Affiliates (without regard
to any period of severance) to exercise any unexercised Option and/or Rights the
holder could have 
<PAGE>
 
exercised on the day on which he left the employ of the Corporation and
Affiliates."

          2.  The provisions of this Amendment No. 3 shall be effective for
terminations occurring on and after November 20, 1996.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AMETEK has caused these presents to be executed,
in its corporate name, by its duly authorized officer, and its corporate seal to
be affixed on this 12th day of December, 1996.

                                        AMETEK, Inc.

                                        By: /s/ Robert W. Yannarell
                                            -----------------------
                                                Robert W. Yannarell

Attest:

/s/ Donna F. Winquist
---------------------
Donna F. Winquist
(Seal)
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00237-CV

Sean Sheldon Power, Appellant

v.

Xenia A. Ramos, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 146TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 221,593-B, HONORABLE RICK MORRIS, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Sean Sheldon Power filed his notice of appeal with the trial court clerk on

June 22, 2007, and a copy was filed with this Court on April 23, 2008. That same day, this Court

received notice from the Bell County District Clerk’s office that appellant had not paid or made

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. The clerk’s record has not been filed. This Court sent

notice to appellant that if he did not submit a status report to this Court by June 17, 2008, this appeal

would be dismissed for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not responded to this Court’s

notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b),

42.3(b).
2

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: July 11, 2008
#### Randy Ratajczak, as Administrator of the Estate of Mary Ratajczak, Deceased, Respondent, v Mahmood Yoonessi, M.D., et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Decided November 23, 2010

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that it does not lie *(see*CPLR 5601).
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - VI A (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

       (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of the
                operations of the Partnership.


          August 16, 2004                   /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
          ---------------                   --------------------
               Date                         Joseph M. Jayson,
                                            Individual General Partner and
                                            Principal Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.01**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350**


**(Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, the undersigned officer of Sandston Corporation (the
      "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
      the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                March 22, 2006
            /s/
                Daniel J. DormanName:
                Daniel J. DormanTitle:
                President and Chief Executive
                Officer





The
      foregoing certification (i) accompanies the filing and is being furnished solely
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, (ii) will not be deemed "filed" for purposes
      of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to
      the
      liability of that section, and (iii) will not be deemed to be incorporated
      by
      reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange
      Act,
      except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates
      it
      by reference.








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Sandston Corporation and will be retained
      by Sandston Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.