alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000823533
<NAME> FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         2,383,784
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     128,789
<MORTGAGE>                                     619,615
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   77,499
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               3,363,247  
      
<CASH>                                         (26,411) 
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              16,888
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         312,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,059,673
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              2,528,749
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             11,132
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 252,506
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            8,374
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     901,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,059,673
<PREMIUMS>                                     962,002
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            176,177
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              46,136 
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  33,742
<BENEFITS>                                     797,062
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     30,883
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           306,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 80,762 
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,267 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             52,495 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,495 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 988,036
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Union Security Insurance Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stacia N. Almquist, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 7, 2008



/s/    Stacia N. AlmquistStacia N. Almquist Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3109 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3109

     To require the Secretary of the Army to conduct levee system 
evaluations and certifications on receipt of requests from non-Federal 
                               interests.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 2010

Mr. Baucus (for himself and Mr. Tester) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require the Secretary of the Army to conduct levee system 
evaluations and certifications on receipt of requests from non-Federal 
                               interests.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Community Flood Protection Act 
of 2010''.

SEC. 2. RURAL COMMUNITY FLOOD PROTECTION.

    (a) In General.--On receipt of a request from a non-Federal 
interest, the Secretary of the Army (referred to in this section as the 
``Secretary'') shall conduct a levee system evaluation and 
certification of a federally authorized levee or a non-federally 
authorized levee for purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program 
established under chapter 1 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 
(42 U.S.C. 4011 et seq.).
    (b) Requirements.--A levee system evaluation and certification 
under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) at a minimum, comply with the requirements of section 
        65.10 of title 44, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on 
        the date of enactment of this Act); and
            (2) be carried out in accordance with such procedures as 
        the Secretary, in consultation with the Director of the Federal 
        Emergency Management Agency, may establish.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Non-federal share.--Subject to paragraph (2), the non-
        Federal share of the cost of carrying out a levee system 
        evaluation and certification under this section shall be 35 
        percent.
            (2) Adjustment.--The Secretary shall adjust the non-Federal 
        share under paragraph (1) to zero if--
                    (A) the non-Federal interest is located in an area 
                with a population of 10,000 or fewer individuals; or
                    (B) the division of the non-Federal interest with 
                responsibility for the applicable levee is staffed by 
                individuals operating on a volunteer basis.
                                 <all>
```
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

CHAIR’S NOTICE – Chairman E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Visit www.NIGC.gov to learn more about the NIGC 3 For 35 Project— a 

year-long project emphasizing the importance of conversations among 

the tribal gaming regulatory community about workforce preparedness.

Date: June 6, 2023

Re: Class II Summit Remarks, Mystic Lake Casino Hotel

I am grateful to the organizers of the annual Class II Summit 

taking place this year in Mystic Lake Casino Hotel. I had the 

opportunity to help make introductory remarks as the Summit 

kicked off by its organizer, Heidi Buss. 

Class II gaming is both a distinct part of the global gaming 

industry, and a significant vehicle for industry innovation,

growth and approach to regulation. Since IGRA’s passage 35 years 

ago this year, class II gaming has been central to Indian 

gaming‘s sustainability and its growth as a $40 billion industry 

with a reputation as well regulated. Over the past 35 years 

NIGC‘s impact on class II has been reflected in the agency’s 

regulations and guidance on game standards. 

As I noted in my remarks, beginning in 1990 the Agency developed 

minimum internal control standards focused on protecting against 

theft of cash and cash equivalents. The agency responded to 

litigation on NIGC’s authority over class III games and over

technology considerations and in subsequent years, NIGC 

Commissions published updates and clarifications to guidance and 

regulations.

I also emphasized regulatory bodies clarifying regulations 

should consider both the approach to defining the issue, and its 

interpretation of lawmakers’ intent to avoid unintended impacts 

from its guidance and preserve and foster industry innovation. 

Over the past three decades the Agency’s clarification process 

for class II regulations has done just that. NIGC Commissions 

have implemented different working group, consultation, and 

inter-governmental outreach models, and considered statutory 

interpretations informed through legislative history that makes 

available maximum flexibility for technological aids in class II 

development. 

I was grateful to the NIGC Saint Paul Minneapolis team for their 

participation in today’s class II summit, as well as the many 

participants from across the Indian gaming community.

###
#### HAHN v. BUCYRUS-ERIE CO.

Civ. No. 7617.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

June 17, 1948.

Richter, Lord & Farage, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Philip Price, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

The motion for summary judgment must be denied. I do not think it can be said that there is no genuine issue as to at least one very material point, namely, the precise nature of the relationship between Fenner and the defendant and Fauzio Bros, as it existed at the time of the accident. This is not a pure question of law but may involve fact issues. Although the defendant’s admissions and Fauzio’s answers to the questions addressed to it indicate clearly what the relationship was at its inception, it does not appear that it was never modified either by subsequent arrangements or by course of conduct and practice. The plaintiff suggests that the true scope and extent of the defendant’s right to control Fenner may depend upon a number of facts and circumstances, as to which evidence must be adduced. Incidentally, the case of Town of River Junction v. Maryland Casualty Co., 5 Cir., 110 F.2d 278, cited by the plaintiff, is not in point. Fauzio’s answers plainly constitute a deposition under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 31, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and, by the express terms of Rule 56, depositions may be considered on the motion for summary judgment. In the Town River Junction case, supra, what the Court excluded from its consideration was answers of a party to interrogatories under Rule 33.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Associates Corporation of North America on Form S-3 (File No. 333-62861) of
our report dated January 19, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Associates Corporation of North America and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                            /s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
 
                                            PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
March 2, 1999
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David A. Ranhoff, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Credence Systems Corporation; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

CHAIR’S NOTICE – Chairman E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Visit www.NIGC.gov to learn more about the NIGC 3 For 35 Project— a 

year-long project emphasizing the importance of conversations among 

the tribal gaming regulatory community about workforce preparedness.

Date: June 6, 2023

Re: Remarks to the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) 

Mid-Year Meeting

I had the opportunity to address the Gaming and Taxation 

subcommittees at the National Congress of American Indians 

(NCAI) Mid-Year Meeting at the Mystic Lake Casino. I want to 

thank the Indian Gaming Association (IGA) for its invitation to 

participate in the subcommittee’s agenda. 

My address focused on NIGC’s attention to technology both as a 

threat to tribe’s gaming operations and an opportunity to 

promote more efficient and focused regulatory oversight tools. 

Whether a threat or an opportunity, technology provides tribal 

law makers a reason to articulate more focused and updated 

oversight objectives, to design more multi-year budget planning 

strategies, and to demonstrate the Indian gaming community’s 

dedication to innovation and support for sustainable industry 

growth. I also previewed upcoming NIGC outreach at the region, 

and national levels. That outreach shapes NIGC planning 

processes and cultivates stronger collaboration between tribes 

and the NIGC. 

During my remarks today I also congratulated IGA Chairman Ernie 

Stevens for leading this policy focused NCAI Gaming Subcommittee 

for over two decades. Early in my career I had the privilege of 

working at NCAI for the Gaming Subcommittee. This privilege 

allowed me to experience first-hand tribal officials’ dedication 

and advocacy for Indian gaming’s success.

###
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

PHILLIP RICHARDS

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 767

LT Case No. 2015

- CF

- 002828

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Decision filed May 2, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Marion County

, Lisa D. Herndon , Judge.

Phillip Richar ds, Okeechobee, pro

se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and A lyssa M. Williams

, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS

, HARRIS and PRATT , JJ., concur.
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
   We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 33-5524, 33-53971, 33-59781, 333-124192, 333-124193, and 333-82847 on
Form S-8 of our reports dated April 9, 2008, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Angelica Corporation
and the effectiveness of Angelica Corporation’s internal control over financial
reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Angelica Corporation
for the year ended January 26, 2008.
 
  St. Louis,
Missouri
 April 9,
2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

*Time and Date:*                         1 p.m.-4 p.m., June 25, 2009 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters to be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of “Addressing Emerging Infectious Diseases and Related Public Health Threats in the People's Republic of China, FOA GH09-002.”                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Shoukat Qari, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone (404) 639-4663.                    

The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Dated: June 2, 2009.

Lorenzo Falgiano,

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-13518 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
EXHIBIT 15

May 5, 2000
Shoreline Financial Corporation
Benton Harbor, Michigan

We have reviewed, in accordance with standards established by the AICPA, the unaudited interim financial information of Shoreline Financial Corporation for the periods ended March 31, 2000 and 1999 as indicated in our report dated May 5, 2000.  Because
we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, which was included in your quarterly report on Form 10-Q, is being incorporated by reference in Registration Statements (File Nos.
33-29052, 333-10629 and 333-09819) on Form S-8 and in the Registration Statement (File No. 33-34008) on Form S-3.

We also are aware that our report referred to above, under Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

/s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
3
6
> COMM

National Indian Gaming Commission
Regulatory Review
Tribal Consultation Agenda — January 30, 2012

Palm Springs, CA
Monday, January 30, 2012*
8:00 am — 8:30 am Registration
94 " TM_ a 4s = ry Opening & Introduction of Tribal Representative — Commissioner

Tribal Representative Welcome and Introductions of Tribal Leaders
Introduction of Commission and Staff —- Commissioner
| Meeting Agenda Overview
Tribal Opening Statements

8:45 am - 10:15 am | Group 1 Regulation Summary & Tribal Comments:
| Part 559 — Facility License Notifications, Renewals, and Submissions

| _ Group 2 Regulation Summary & Tribal Comments:

| Part 573 — Enforcement;

Part 502 — Definitions;

| Regulations concerning proceedings before the Commission, including: Parts
519 — Service, Part 524 — Appeals, Part 539 — Appeals, and Part 577 —
Appeals Before the Commission.

Morning Break

10:15 am - 10:30 am |
10:30am-12:30pm Group 4 Regulation Summary & Tribal Comments:

Part 556 — Background Investigations for Primary Management Officials and
Key Employees — Pilot Program;

Part 558 — Gaming Licenses for Key Employees and Primary Management
Officials — Pilot Program; and

Part 537 — Background Investigations for Persons or Entities With a Financial
Interest in, or Having Management Responsibility for, a Management
Contract; and

Group 5 Regulation Summary & Tribal Comments:
Part 518 — Self Regulation of Class II Gaming

Please note that for Group 3 regulations (Minimum Internal Control Standards and Technical
Standards) the Commission is utilizing a Tribal Advisory Committee to facilitate its review and
intends to consult with Tribes on any potential changes after the TAC process is completed.

* The timeframes set forth in the agenda are estimates. Consultations may run longer or shorter depending on the needs of a
particular consultation. Tribal leaders may provide comments on all regulatory groups identified for the consultation regardless of
the order set forth in the agenda.