alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HAYS et al. v. HERCULES POWDER CO.

No. 4505.

District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D.

Nov. 1, 1947.

*600Smith F. Brandom, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Madden, Freeman, Madden & Burke, of Kansas City, Mo., and Stevens & Brand, of Lawrence, Kan., for defendant.

REEVES, District Judge.

Several motions have been filed in the above cause, including a motion to dismiss. It is obvious from a reading of the complaint that the action is based upon the decision in Anderson et al. v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 90 L.Ed. 1515, which is known as the Portal to Portal case.

 Subsequently to that decision the Congress enacted a law, 29 U.S.C.A. § 251 et seq., which had the effect to nullify said opinion, or at least to authorize recovery in the federal courts only in those cases where by contract or custom the claimants were entitled to the compensation mentioned, that is, compensation for time spent in preparation for the day’s employment. In the absence of such contract or custom, the Congress took away from the federal courts jurisdiction. It is necessary, therefore, in such cases, for the claimant to allege, as required by Rule 8(a), Rules of Civil Procedure in the Federal Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, facts which show jurisdiction.

Moreover, another question arises in this case, and that is whether the plaintiffs were engaged in commerce or the production of goods for commerce. If the complainants were engaged in producing goods for the government in its war activities, then such activities were not in commerce.

In this case it may be questioned whether the complaint shows a right to relief. The courts have been very liberal in sustaining complaints as against motions to dismiss, but in this case no facts are stated which can do more than create a suspicion that plaintiffs may be able to state a cause of action cognizable in this court.

The complainants will be granted 30 days within which to file an amended complaint. Upon failure to do so an order of dismissal will be made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>



Exhibit 27.  Financial Data Schedule

                                    ZOOM TELEPHONICS, INC.
                                       March 31, 2000
</LEGEND>
           <MULTIPLIER>                                         1
            <CURRENCY>                                         USD



<S>                                              <C>


            <PERIOD-TYPE>                                     Year
            <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
            <PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
            <PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
            <EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
            <CASH>                                       8,118,943
            <SECURITIES>                                 3,316,870
            <RECEIVABLES>                                7,579,472
            <ALLOWANCES>                                 4,013,208
            <INVENTORY>                                  9,964,299
            <CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,347,303
            <PP&E>                                       4,157,361
            <DEPRECIATION>                                 199,380
            <TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,478,285
            <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,989,789
            <BONDS>                                              0
            <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
            <PREFERRED>                                          0
            <COMMON>                                    27,233,477
            <OTHER-SE>                                  10,830,063
            <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,478,285
            <SALES>                                     16,638,960
            <TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,618,052
            <CGS>                                        9,237,239
            <TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,880,004
            <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,793
            <LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
            <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (133,689)
            <INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,384,295)
            <INCOME-TAX>                                 (442,880)
            <INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (941,415)
            <DISCONTINUED>                                      0
            <EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
            <CHANGES>                                           0
            <NET-INCOME>                                 (941,415)
            <EPS-BASIC>                                    (.12)
            <EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)



</TABLE>
POWI-EX10.2_2022.6.30_Q2

​

 
Exhibit 10.2
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
​
LETTER AGREEMENT RE: EXECUTIVE OFFICER BENEFITS AGREEMENT
​
This Letter Agreement Re: Executive Officer Benefits Agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) is made and entered into as of August 1, 2022 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Power Integrations, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the “Company”) and Yang Chiah Yee (“Executive”).
Whereas, Executive is an executive officer of the Company and possesses valuable knowledge of the Company, its business and operations, and the markets in which the Company competes, and the Company desires to supplement Executive’s employment arrangements so as to provide additional benefits to the Executive to encourage Executive to continue to devote his attention and dedication to the Company and its business.
Whereas, the Company and Executive previously entered into an Executive Officer Benefits Agreement by and between the Company and Executive, dated June 14, 2021 (the “EOBA”).
Now, Therefore, in consideration of the mutual agreements, covenants and considerations contained herein, the undersigned hereby agree and acknowledge that, notwithstanding the definition of “Senior Executive” set forth in the EOBA, for the purposes of the EOBA Executive is hereby deemed a “Senior Executive” thereunder as of the Effective Date.
In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have executed this Letter Agreement, intending to be legally bound as of the Effective Date.
	COMPANY:
​
	Power Integrations, Inc.
By:    /s/ BALU BALAKRISHNAN
       Name: Balu Balakrishnan
Title:   President and CEO
​

	​
	​

	EXECUTIVE:
​
​
​
	​
​
  /s/ YANG CHIAH YEE 
Yang Chiah Yee 
​



​

​
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  Schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements  contiained in the Company's Form 10-Q and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    APR-30-1997
<CASH>                          398,415
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,000
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                399,415
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  399,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,100
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        10,970,000
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    399,415
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,830
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             2,836
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    2,836
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
        
<PAGE>


</TABLE>
: :
United States

Office of
Personnel Management — washington, DC 20415-0001

: «JUL 28 2nq9

Ms. Carolyn Cohen

* Director of Personnel
1849 C Street, NW, MS 5221
Washington, DC 20240

Dear Ms. Cohen:

This letter approves the Supplemental Standard for the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s
Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Interior’s Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of
. Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Park Service for GS-401,
’ Fire Manager'series. With this approval, the standard can be used ed immediately within

your agencies.

We pleased to have been a part of this cooperative effort, and hope that this supplemental
standard will meet the needs of the fire management community, Please convey our

) of the Federal Fire Institute for their time aid’expertise in the development of the
standard. Ifyou have any questions regarding the new standard, or if we can be of
further assistance, please contact me or Cynthia Diané of my staff at (202) 606-0830.

Sincerely,

A 2 Lon.

Assistant Director
for Employment Policy

Enclosure

NL

cB ADV OOHOd P8126 122% BELLT

In Reply Refer Tor Your Refeence:

sincere appreciation to James Tingwald for seeing this project to completion, and the staff

CON 114.243
aly 1895,

8682 /88/2T
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T SAND RA VI OLET A RAM I RE Z M A ZA RI EG O S, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70543 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 956- 004 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 6, 2012 ** B e f o r e : B . F L E T C H E R , R E I N H A R D T , an dT A S H I M A , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . S andra V i ol et a R am i re z M az ar i egos, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f G uat em al a, pe t i t i ons pr o s e f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) de c i s i on d e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e o p e n . W e h av e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e 

# FI LED MA R 13 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70543 2 r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a lof am ot i on t o r e ope n, and w e r e vi e w de n o v o c la im s o f

in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e in im m ig r a tio n p r o c e e d in g s , Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 40 0 F . 3d78 5, 79 1-92 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). W e grantthe pet i t i on for r evi ew an dr e m an d . T he B IA abused i t s di sc re t i on w hen i tdeni ed M az ar i egos’ s m ot i on t o reopen f o rf a ilu r e to e s tab lis h p r e

ju d ic e , b e c au s e M a z ar ie g o s p r e s e n te dap lau s ib le c la im f orr e l i e f , and he rnot ary ’ s f

a i l ur e t o f

i l e abr i e f

t o the B I A m ayhave a f f e c t e d the o u tc o m e o f

h e rr e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s . See Si ng h v. H older , 6 5 8 F .3 d8 7 9 , 8 8 7 ( 9 th C i r. 20 11 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.
#### REMINGTON’S DAIRY v. RUTLAND RY. CORP.

Civ. A. No. 1567.

United States District Court, District of Vermont.

May 21, 1954.

*489Christopher A. Webber, Rutland, Vt., for plaintiff.

Edwin W. Lawrence, Rutland, Vt., for defendant.

GIBSON, Judge.

The complaint in this civil action was brought in the name of the partnership, Remington’s Dairy, a Rhode Island entity. The defendant moved to dismiss on two grounds, i. e. that the partnership has no right to maintain the action in its own name, and that the complaint fails to show diversity of citizenship of the parties. Thereafter, the plaintiff moved to amend its complaint so as t<5 allege the citizenship of the members of the partnership. By agreement of counsel, the matter was submitted on briefs and argument was waived.

The Federal Rules, in defining the capacity of parties other than individuals and corporations, provide in part: “In all other cases capacity to sue or be sued shall be determined by the law of the state in which the district court is held * * Rule 17(b), F.R.C.P.

It is clear that under the law of this state, a partnership may bring suit in its firm name. Sec. 1565 of the Vermont Statutes, Revision of 1947, provides that “A partnership * * * may sue and be sued in its firm * * name * * *. ” See F. R. Patch Mfg. Co. v. Capeless, 79 Vt. 1, 63 A. 938. It follows, therefore, that the complaint here in issue was properly brought in the name of the partnership, and the first ground of defendant’s motion will be deemed faulty.

Plaintiff’s motion to amend is more directly concerned with the second ground of defendant’s motion to dismiss, and the two might well be discussed together.

 It seems a settled rule that— as far as diversity is concerned — a partnership will be deemed to be a resident of the district wherein it has its principal place of business. Darby v. Philadelphia Transportation Co. D.C.E.D.Pa., 73 F.Supp. 522. It appears here that the plaintiff has its principal place of business in Rhode Island, and inasmuch as the plaintiff’s motion is aimed only at a clarification of the diversity issue, it ought to be granted.

Therefore, it is the order of this Court that the following entries be made: “Defendant’s motion denied on all grounds.”; “Plaintiff’s motion to amend granted.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,948,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,110,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (213,014)
<INVENTORY>                                    231,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,683,893
<PP&E>                                       2,596,506
<DEPRECIATION>                               (973,517)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,677,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,866,942
<BONDS>                                        736,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       209,686
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,019,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,677,021
<SALES>                                      4,582,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,582,468
<CGS>                                        1,222,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,300,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                292,745
<INCOME-TAX>                                    96,606
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            196,139
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   196,139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership VI-A for
the quarter ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                           213,400
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       0
<PP&E>                                                        20,735,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 7,460,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                14,344,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            980,334
<BONDS>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  14,344,152
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               1,065,601
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    972,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               289,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (120,865)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (120,865)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0


</TABLE>
No. 49.

No. 763.

No. 764.

No. 765.

#### Morton Salt Co. *v.*G. S. Suppiger Co.; Fitzgerald, Trustee, *v.*Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana; Fitzgerald, Trustee, *v.*Gulf Refining Co.; Fitzgerald, Trustee, *v.*Humble Oil & Refining Co.; *827Fitzgerald, Trustee, *v.*Shell Oil Co., Inc.; Fitgerald, Trustee, *v.*Freeport Sulphur Co.; Fitzgerald, Trustee, *v.*Cockrell; Fitzgerald, Trustee, *v.*Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana et al.; and Fitzgerald, Trustee, *v.*Cockrell et al.

No. 766.

No. 767.

No. 768.

No. 769.

Nos. 770 and 771.

February 2, 1942.

Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications.

314 U. S. 488, 701.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3269

_____________________________
L ESTER Y ARBROUGH , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Linda F. Mc C allum , Judge

. April 17, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J.
, and M AKAR and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Lester Yarbrough, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, f or Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from unaudited financial statements for the
three month period ending March 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>        0000822983
<NAME>       SOUTHEASTERN INCOME PROPERTIES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY>   U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
<CASH>                                                   777,981
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0
<PP&E>                                                24,252,632
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (8,646,306)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        17,031,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          0
<BONDS>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                             8,509,528 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          17,031,721
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         962,332
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         459,786 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       187,227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (66,326) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (66,326) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (66,326) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (1.57) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (1.57)
        


</TABLE>