alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

 <ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000823533
<NAME> FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         2,677,663
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      89,976
<MORTGAGE>                                     758,447
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   47,634
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               3,762,010
<CASH>                                         (53,487)
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              39,053
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         424,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,970,692
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              3,151,402
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             29,878
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 256,744
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            7,566
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     861,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,970,692
<PREMIUMS>                                     367,282
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             72,039
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (11,548)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  15,736
<BENEFITS>                                     293,724
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     10,576
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           121,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,532
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,989
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,543
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,534
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                               1,139,603
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0



</TABLE>
#### AZAROW et al. v. SHERNETH CORPORATION.

District Court, S. D. New York.

May 13, 1948.

Bernard S. Glick, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

John P. Smith, of New York City (Joseph A. Minch, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

HULBERT, District Judge.

Defendant moves for an order directing plaintiffs to furnish security for costs in the sum of $250.

The plaintiffs, both of whom are residents of the State of New Jersey, oppose the application upon the ground that this Court is without authority.

It is conceded that such authority formerly existed by Local Rule 53 of this Court which, however, counsel points out, was omitted from the present Rules of this District. And moreover, he contends that the Conformity Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 724,* has been abrogated by the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and by reason of the fact that the present Local Rules of this District do not contain such provision. In this he is in error.

Pursuant to Rule 83, F.R.C.P., this Court adopted Local Rule No. 34, which reads as follows:

“Whenever a procedural question arises which is not covered by the provisions of any statute of the United States, or of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or of these rules, it shall be determined, if possible, by the parallels or analogies furnished by such statutes and rules. If, however, no such parallels or analogies exist, then the procedure heretofore prevailing in courts of equity of the United States, or in default thereof the procedure which shall then prevail in the Supreme Court of the State of New York shall be applied.”

This Court has heretofore had occasion pursuant to this rule, in bankruptcy, to follow the provisions of Sec. 1522 of the Civil Practice Act of the State of New York, In re Utility Consumers Service, Inc., D.C., 38 F.Supp. 102, and Judge Leibell applied the rule in a civil action for declaratory judgment in Cavicchi v. Mohawk Mfg. Co., Inc., D.C., 27 F.Supp. 981. Judge Leibell denied it in a derivative stockholders action, Craftsman Finance & Mortgage Co. v. Brown et al., D.C., 64 F. Supp. 168, at page 178, where he said:

“Whether this Court in'any given case will follow the State Supreme Court in applying § 61-b (of the General Corporation Law of New York, Consol.Laws, c. 23) rests in the sound discretion of the Federal Judge, under Rule 34 of our local Civil Rules.”

In the case at bar the defendant is a New York Corporation engaged in the operation of a hotel at 59th Street and Fifth Avenue, Borough of Manhattan, New *248York, and it is a reasonable inference that the plaintiffs could not secure jurisdiction over said, defendant anywhere except in the Southern District of New: York. Therefore, this Court, in the exercise of what it believes to be a sound discretion, will deny the motion. Settle order on notice.

*

 See Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., Inc., 312 U.S. 1, 655, 61 S.Ct. 422, 85 L.Ed. 479.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of China Granite Corporation, a Nevada
Corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Costas M. Takkas, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Granite Corporation, and will be retained by China Granite Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
 
 /s/ Costas M.
Takkas
 Costas M.
Takkas
 President/Chief
Financial Officer
 March 26, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7076

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TIMNAH RUDISILL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-01-48; CA-05-212-1) Submitted: November 23, 2005 Decided: December 20, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timnah K. Rudisill, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Timnah Rudisill seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rudisill has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
May 26,2011 

Kathy Zebell 

· National Indian Gaming Commission 

1441 L Street, NW, Suite 9100 

Washington, DC 20005 

Re: NIGC Consultation Policy 

TRIBAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. 

P.O. BOX 305 • LAPWAI, IDAHO 83540 • (208) 843-2253 

The Nez Perce Tribe would like to provide the following comments concerning the NIGC's 

consultation policy. The Tr,ibe coinmendsthe NIGC for its revised consultation policy. The 

policy as it is written complies with Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with · 

Tribal Governments. The consultation policy is a positive step forward to foster respectful and 

meaningful Govemment-to-Govefru:nent consultation between Tribal Governments and the · 

NIGC. 

The Tribe remains concerned however that the NIGC, as a commission within the Department of 

the Interior, should follow the administrative rules for all Federal agencies, including: 

• Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Rulemaking (recently amended by 

Executive Order 13497 to restore the Vice President's oversightresponsibilities); 

• The Unfunded Mandates Act; 

• The Regulatory Flexibility Act; and 

• The Federal Advisory Committee Act. 

The Nez Perce Tribe respectfully requests that the draft policy on consultation be amended to 

incorporate the requirements of these federal laws and policies. By failing to adhere to these 

federal laws impacting tribal consultation, the NIGC's recent process on regulatory rulemaking 

was defective. For example, the 2009 Facility Licensing rules were promulgated with only a 45-

. day comment period. The facility licensing regulation should be withdrawn and revised to be 

consistent with the IGRA and re-issued for consultation with Indian tribes. Concerning the Class · 
II regulations, the NI GC did not provide for tribal gaming regulatory review and did not make 

any of the reasonable changes recommended by tribal governments. 

In the past when anJndian tribe has identified an operational concern or regulatory issue, the 

NIGC has reacted by issuing a Notice of Violation which inhibits further Tribal cooperation. 

Instead, the NIGC should send an initial letter of inquiry detailing their concerns and work with 

Tribes to assure tribal regulatory compliance without imposing fines or unnecessary penalties. 

The Nez Perce Tribe appreciates the steps you are currently taking with regards to consultation. 

The Tribe believes the NIGC's new approach is a reflection of the fact that while the NIGC may 

have approximately 100 regulators, Tribal Governments employ more than 3,000 tribal 

regulators and regulatory staff. Therefore, it is imperative that the NIGC should act to promote 

best practices for Indian gaming regulation, assist tribal governments to build strong tribal 

regulatory agencies, and promote voluntary compliance with Indian gaming regulations. 

Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this comment
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated January 23, 2001 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Integrated Measurement Systems, Inc. included in this Form 10-K
into Credence Systems Corporation's previously filed Registration Statement File
Nos. 333-58100, 333-50432, 333-32834, 333-77007, 333-59051, 333-27499,
333-03806, 33-90728, 333-38428, 333-69584 and 333-74346 on Form S-8.

Portland, Oregon,
January 28, 2002



                                       /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13466]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,857; TA-W-65,857A; TA-W-65,857B]


Steelcase, Inc., Kentwood, MI; Steelcase University, Grand 
Rapids, MI; Steelcase, Inc., Caledonia, MI; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 28, 2009, in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Steelcase, 
Inc., Kellwood, Michigan (TA-W-65,857), Steelcase University, Grand 
Rapids, Michigan (TA-W-65,857A), and Steelcase, Inc., Caledonia, 
Michigan (TA-W-65,857B).
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of May, 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13466 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# Sobre El NIFA

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

 ubicada aquí en inglés

Sobre El NIFA(pdf - 124.12 KB)

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

funding opportunityNew Beginning for Tribal Students Program

funding opportunityResearch Facilities Act Program

funding opportunityAgriculture and Food Research Initiative - Education and Workforce Development

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

postProtecting Our Water

postNumber of AFRI FY 2024 Commodity Board Co-Funding Topics Breaks Record; Expands Focus on Nutrition 

postTropical Birds Could Tolerate Warming Better Than Expected 

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

postTropical Birds Could Tolerate Warming Better Than Expected 

postCultivating the Future: Agricultural Innovations for Climate Resilience

postNevada Researcher Aims to Improve Sorghum Hybrids for Dairy Cattle Feed
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13451]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,775]


Circor Energy, Oklahoma City, OK; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 8, 2009, in response to a petition 
filed by three workers on behalf of all workers at Circor Energy, 
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
    The petitioners requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of May 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13451 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
      to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Steve Westlund


Steve
      Westlund


Chief
      Executive Officer, President


and
      Director





November
      21, 2005
#### In the Matter of Ivan Rippy, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[976 NYS2d 419]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of refusing a direct order. The Attorney General has informed this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination at issue was administratively reversed, all references thereto were expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge was refunded to his inmate account. As such, petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see *Matter of Hinton v Rock,*108 AD3d 981, 982 [2013]; *Matter of Jimenez v Fischer,*108 AD3d 958 [2013]).

Peters, EJ, Stein, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3175 

To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to require the 

Bureau of Land Management to provide a claimant of a small miner 

waiver from claim maintenance fees with a period of 60 days after 

written receipt of 1 or more defects is provided to the claimant by 

registered mail to cure the 1 or more defects or pay the claim maintenance fee, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2010 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 

to require the Bureau of Land Management to provide 

a claimant of a small miner waiver from claim maintenance fees with a period of 60 days after written receipt 

of 1 or more defects is provided to the claimant by 

registered mail to cure the 1 or more defects or pay 

the claim maintenance fee, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3175 IS

1 SECTION 1. SMALL MINER WAIVERS TO CLAIM MAINTE2 NANCE FEES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 10101(d)(3) of the Omni4 bus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C. 

5 28f(d)(3)) is amended by striking ‘‘for any reason, the 

6 claimant shall have a period of 60 days after receipt of 

7 written notification of the defect or defects by the Bureau 

8 of Land Management to:’’ and inserting ‘‘for any reason 

9 (including the failure to timely file a small miner’s mainte10 nance fee waiver application or an affidavit of annual labor 

11 associated with the application and required application 

12 fees), the claimant shall have a period of 60 days after 

13 receipt of written notification of the 1 or more defects pro14 vided by the Bureau of Land Management by registered 

15 mail to’’. 

16 (b) TRANSITION RULES.— 

17 (1) The claimholder of claims numbered 

18 AA023149, AA023163, AA047913, AA047914, 

19 AA047915, AA047916, AA047917, AA047918, and 

20 AA047919 (as of December 29, 2004) shall be con21 sidered— 

22 (A) to have received a first half final cer23 tificate for application AA072648 (associated 

24 with the claims) before September 30, 1994; 

25 and 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3175 IS

1 (B) to qualify for relief under section 

2 10101(d)(3) of the Omnibus Budget Reconcili3 ation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C. 28f(d)(3)) and 

4 have the opportunity to cure under that section 

5 for any prior period for which 1 or more defects 

6 existed or there was a failure to pay claim 

7 maintenance fees. 

8 (2) The claims numbered AAFF057833, 

9 AKFF057834, AKFF057840, AKFF084389, 

10 AKFF085204, AKFF096323, AKFF086324, 

11 AKFF086267, AKFF084387, and AKFF084388 

12 shall be— 

13 (A) considered to qualify for relief under 

14 section 10101(d)(3) of the Omnibus Budget 

15 Reconciliation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C. 

16 28f(d)(3)); and 

17 (B) given notice of defect and the oppor18 tunity to cure. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
0 MEANS NOT APPLICABLE OR NOT SEPARATELY DISCLOSED. THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S AUDITED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,620
<SECURITIES>                                     1,866
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,038
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,379
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             239
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         48,633
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           147
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,609
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,577
<SALES>                                          7,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,099
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,805
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   949
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,503
<INCOME-TAX>                                       551
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                952
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       952
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>