alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         176,823
<SECURITIES>                                   260,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,905
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,988
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               422,191
<PP&E>                                      15,726,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,739,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,240,123
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    800,000
<COMMON>                                         9,858
<OTHER-SE>                                     665,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,739,383
<SALES>                                         69,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,432
<CGS>                                           48,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  715,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               174,640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (896,086)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (896,086)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (896,086)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charge Calculation
(dollars in thousands)
 Fiscal Year Ended September 30,2003
    
    
    2004
    
    

2005Pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations
    
    
    (9,147
    )(1)
    
    
    16,979
    
    
    
    16,167Fixed charges:Interest expense + Amortization of deferred financing from continuing operations
    
    
    36,171
    
    
    
    31,347
    
    
    
    29,828Interest expense from discontinued operations
    
    
    3,036
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest factor of rental expense
    
    
    10,012
    
    
    
    8,148
    
    
    
    8,948Total fixed charges
    
    
    49,219
    
    
    
    39,495
    
    
    
    38,776Pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations plus fixed charges
    
    
    40,072
    
    
    
    56,474
    
    
    
    54,943Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charge
    
    
    N/A
    (2)
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.4
 
 (1)
    
    Included in earnings for 2003 was a nonrecurring loss of $14,000 before income taxes relating to the settlement of class action securities
litigation stemming from accounting irregularities discovered in October 2000. If this settlement had not occurred, the coverage ratio would
have been 1.1:1.(2)
    
    In 2003 the ratio coverage was less than 1:1. The Company must generate additional earnings of $9,147 to achieve a coverage ratio of 1:1.
EXHIBIT 99.1


    Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
                                     Code)


     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Zoom Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

(1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the
     "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Form  10-Q  fairly  presents,  in all
     materials  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



Dated:  May 8, 2003                        /s/ Frank B. Manning
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Frank B. Manning
                                            Chief Executive Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ZOOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL
BE RETAINED BY ZOOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.2


    Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
                                     Code)


     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Zoom Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

(1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the
     "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Form  10-Q  fairly  presents,  in all
     materials  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
     the Company.


Dated:  May 8, 2003                        /s/ Robert A. Crist
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert A. Crist
                                            Chief Financial Officer



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ZOOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND WILL
BE RETAINED BY ZOOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
INTER PARFUMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES





Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION




The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Inter Parfums, Inc., that the Quarterly Report of Inter Parfums, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Inter Parfums, Inc.




Date: May 9, 2011
By:
/s/ Russell GreenbergRussell GreenbergExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inter Parfums, Inc. and will be retained by Inter Parfums, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- The Boeing Company Under Contract No. N00019-07-C-0035 APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60185

Andrew E. Shipley, Esq. Seth H. Locke, Esq.

Perkins Coie LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Samuel W. Morris, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Chantilly, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 11 April 2017

MARK N. STEMPLER Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA No. 60185, Appeal ofThe Boeing Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
*Monday, April 14, 1997*

MOTION DOCKET

96-2853.

#### State v. White.

Summit C.P. No. CR96010059. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Summit County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to supplement the record/motion to amend filing date and stay proceedings,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the briefing schedule under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIX(5) shall commence on April 8,1997, the date the Clerk of the Supreme Court received and filed the transcript of proceedings in this case. Under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIX(5), appellant’s brief shall be due ninety days from April 8, 1997, and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. XIX(5).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3075 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3075

   To withdraw certain Federal land and interests in that land from 
location, entry, and patent under the mining laws and disposition under 
                the mineral and geothermal leasing laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 4, 2010

Mr. Baucus (for himself and Mr. Tester) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To withdraw certain Federal land and interests in that land from 
location, entry, and patent under the mining laws and disposition under 
                the mineral and geothermal leasing laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North Fork Watershed Protection Act 
of 2010''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Eligible federal land.--The term ``eligible Federal 
        land'' means any federally owned land or interest in land 
        depicted on the Map as within the North Fork Flathead 
        Watershed.
            (2) Map.--The term ``Map'' means the Bureau of Land 
        Management map entitled ``North Fork Federal Lands Withdrawal 
        Area'' and dated February 27, 2010.
    (b) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing rights, the eligible 
Federal land is withdrawn from--
            (1) all forms of location, entry, and patent under the 
        mining laws; and
            (2) disposition under all laws relating to mineral or 
        geothermal leasing.
    (c) Availability of Map.--The Map shall be made available to the 
public at each appropriate office of the Bureau of Land Management by 
not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.14

ADDENDUM
NO. 1

THIS
ADDENDUM NO. 1 to that certain Option Agreement dated September 4, 2002 ("Option
Agreement"), by and between Western Gold Resources, Inc. (as "Optionor")
and Atlas Minerals, Inc. (as "Optionee"), is made and entered into this 3rd
day January, 2003. By executing below, the parties hereto agree that the Option
Agreement shall be amended as follows:

Item
1.    Effective as of the date of this Addendum No. 1, all of the rights, title and
interest of Atlas Minerals, Inc., as Optionee, are hereby assigned to, and assumed by,
Atlas Precious Metals, Inc. ("APMI"), a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Atlas Minerals, Inc.

Item
2. Option Period is hereby amended to extend the term of the
Option to March 31, 2003, unless a lesser or greater term shall be agreed upon
by the parties.

Item
3.    Option Price  in consideration of the extension of the Option period as provided in
Item 2. above, $50,000 shall be paid to the Optionor's account upon execution of this
Addendum No. 1.

Item
4.    Merger Consideration  subparagraph a. under this heading is rewritten to read
as follows:

a.   
$100,000.00 due and payable by wire transfer to Optionors account within
five business days following the successful closing of one or more private
placements or other offerings of the securities of APMI and/or Western Gold
Resources which, in the aggregate, result in net proceeds to the merged entity
of $500,000.00 or more.

Item
5.    Except as amended above, all terms and provisions of the Option Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect, as written.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties herein have affixed their signatures on the day
and date first above written.

|Atlas Minerals, Inc.,
a Colorado corporation/s/ Gerald E. Davis
Gerald E. Davis
Its: President | Western Gold Resources, Inc.,
an Arizona corporation/s/ Harold R. Shipes
Harold R. Shipes
Its: President
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Atlas Precious Metals, Inc.
a Nevada corporation/s/ Gerald E. Davis
Gerald E. Davis
Its: President | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                          USD

       

<S>                                                         <C>


<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                        9,023,581
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                12,581,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  6,145,878
<INVENTORY>                                                  12,235,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             40,151,479
<PP&E>                                                        3,844,483
<DEPRECIATION>                                                2,977,347
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               45,384,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         4,661,577
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                     25,190,579
<OTHER-SE>                                                   15,531,907
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 45,384,063
<SALES>                                                      23,394,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             18,758,702
<CGS>                                                        13,557,817
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 5,077,578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                123,307
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 322,665
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    123,086
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             199,579
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    199,579
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0.03

        


</TABLE>
S. 2950 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal history background checks. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal History Background 

Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2009’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM. 

Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a 

note) is amended by striking ‘‘a 78-month’’ and inserting ‘‘a 92- 

month’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            9236
<SECURITIES>                                      1127
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9450
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          518623
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (8495)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  529941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           589561
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      20000
<COMMON>                                        864482
<OTHER-SE>                                    (942102)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    529941
<SALES>                                          40672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 40672
<CGS>                                            (396)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    (396)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 38980
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    749
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       749
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricky L. Winters, Appellant.

[977 NYS2d 664]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis and for other relief denied. Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Peradotto and Lindley, JJ.
#### Eduardo Alfredo TALLEDO-ACOSTA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-60707.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Nov. 2, 2006.

Renata Anna Pilny, Marcia S Kasdan & Associates, Hackensack, NJ, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Jennifer Jeanette Keeney, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Cindy S. Ferrier, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Caryl G. Thompson, U.S. Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, District Directors Office, Joe A. Aguilar, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pro se.

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Eduardo Alfredo Talledo-Acosta seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial as untimely of his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. Talledo-Acosta asserts that the denial of his motion to reopen was a violation of his Fifth Amendment due process rights because he has never been granted an opportunity to present evidence on behalf of his application for adjustment of status, which is based on a 1995-approved 1-140 immigrant worker visa petition filed by his prospective employer.

The decision to reopen proceedings is a discretionary decision, and this court applies a highly deferential abuse of discretion standard when reviewing the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. *Lara v. Trominski,*216 F.3d 487, 496 (5th Cir. 2000). Talledo-Acosta does not challenge the BIA’s ruling that his motion to reopen his 1986 deportation proceedings was untimely filed. Thus, any challenge to the timeliness of his motion to reopen is deemed abandoned. *See Soadjede v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir.2003). Because there is no protected liberty interest in a motion to reopen, Talledo-Acosta cannot establish a due process violation under the Fifth Amendment. *See Altamirano-Lopez v. Gonzales,*435 F.3d 547, 551 (5th Cir.2006).

*425Accordingly, Talledo-Acosta’s petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.