alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### PALMER v. LANAC REALTY CO., Inc., et al. GIBBONS v. LANAC REALTY CO., Inc., et al.

Civ. A. Nos. 15752, 15753.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Feb. 25, 1954.

Raymond A. White, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Howard R. Detweiler, Frank R. Ambler, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

GANEY, District Judge.

This case arises upon plaintiffs’ motions to vacate the order allowing the third-party complaints and also to strike off pleadings in two death actions. The gist of plaintiffs’ complaints is that the accident and injuries which caused the death of the respective decedents were due to the negligence of the agents of the defendant, Lanac Realty Company, Inc.1 The latter has filed third-party complaints against L. Blumberg’s Son, Inc., the employer of each of the decedents, claiming that on the basis of a written agreement between them the employer is liable to it for the full amount of any judgment which plaintiffs may obtain in the actions.

The reason for plaintiffs’ motions is that the third-party complaints would introduce new and separate causes of action between defendant and the additional defendant, resulting in delay, inconvenience and prejudice to plaintiffs’ trial.

We believe the motions to vacate or to strike the third-party complaints are improper here. Kravas v. Great A. & P. Tea Co., D.C.W.D.Pa.1939, 28 F.Supp. 66. Motions for separate trials under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., would seem to this court as being more appropriate in these actions. See 5 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d Ed., § 42.03. The allowing of such *360*a*motion by the trial judge would grant the relief sought by plaintiffs in making their present motions. Consequently we will deny plaintiffs’ motions without prejudice so that they may be free to present motions for separate trials at the proper time.

Accordingly, plaintiffs’ motions will be denied.

1

. Diversity is the sole basis for this court’s jurisdiction over the subject matter of the actions.
# Drill #8

&"Times New Roman,Bold"Fireline Construction		&"Times New Roman,Bold"Drill #8

&P	

&P	

# Code Page

# image1.png
No. 858.

#### Lavietes *v.*Ferro Stamping & Manufacturing Co. et al.

March 16, 1942.

*Mr. Frank C. Sibley*for petitioner. *Mr. Victor C. Swearingen*for the Ferro Stamping *&*Mfg. Co. et al., and *Mr. Raymond K. Dykema*for the Detroit Harvester Co., respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
#### Fahim Majawalla, as Executor of Yusuf K. Majawalla, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v Utica First Insurance Company, Appellant.

Submitted March 14, 2011;

decided May 3, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12883]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Intent To Grant an Exclusive License; University of 
Maryland

AGENCY: National Security Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Security Agency hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant University of Maryland a revocable, non-assignable, exclusive 
license to practice the following Government-Owned invention as 
described in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 61/081,998 entitled: 
``Flexible, High Specific Energy Density, Rechargeable Battery,'' filed 
with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office on July 18, 2008, and any 
related non-provisional patent application and all Letters Patent 
issuing thereon, and any continuation, continuation-in-part or division 
of said non-provisional patent application and any reissue or extension 
of said Letters Patent, in the field of thin film batteries. The above-
mentioned invention is assigned to the United States Government as 
represented by the National Security Agency.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license has 
fifteen (15) days from the date of this notice to file written 
objections along with any supporting evidence, if any.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the National 
Security Agency Technology Transfer Program, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 
6541, Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-6541.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marian T. Roche, Director, Technology 
Transfer Program, 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6541, Fort George G. Meade, 
MD 20755-6541, telephone (443) 479-9569.

    Dated: May 28, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-12883 Filed 6-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                                     969,259
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              135,158
<ALLOWANCES>                                                15,552
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           4,114,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                               3,109,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             4,114,956
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         1,066,654
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           530,093
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          96,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            440,279
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        440,279
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               440,279
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        
 

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of Synergx  Systems  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Daniel
S. Tamkin,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  and I, John A.  Poserina,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to ss.  906  of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  to my
knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                         /S/ Daniel S. Tamkin
                                         Daniel S. Tamkin
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Synergx Systems Inc.
                                         August 11, 2006



                                         /S/ John A Poserina
                                         John A, Poserina
                                         Chief Financial  Officer
                                         Synergx Systems Inc.
                                         August 11, 2006
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 22 

Congratulating Bode Miller for winning the 2004–2005 World Cup overall 

title in Alpine skiing. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. SUNUNU (for himself and Mr. GREGG) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Bode Miller for winning the 2004–2005 

World Cup overall title in Alpine skiing. 

Whereas on March 12, 2005, Bode Miller became the first 

United States skier in 22 years to win the Alpine skiing 

World Cup overall title; 

Whereas on the previous day Bode Miller won the World Cup 

super G title for the 2004–2005 season when he tied 

teammate Daron Rahlves for first place in the final super 

G race of the season; 

Whereas Bode Miller won gold medals in the downhill and 

super G at the 2005 World Alpine Ski Championships in 

Bormio, Italy; 

Whereas in the 2004–2005 season Bode Miller accomplished 

what only two other men have done in the history of the 
2 

•SCON 22 IS

Alpine skiing World Cup by leading the overall standings 

from the season’s start to finish; 

Whereas Bode Miller finished the 2004–2005 World Cup season with seven victories and became only the second athlete to win in all four disciplines (slalom, giant slalom, 

super G, and downhill) in a single season; 

Whereas Bode Miller was raised in Easton, New Hampshire, 

began skiing at age 3 at nearby Cannon Mountain, and 

began competing at age 11; 

Whereas in 1990 Bode Miller became a competitive ski racer 

at Carrabassett Valley Academy in Maine at age 13 and 

debuted in World Cup competition in 1998, finishing 

11th in his first race; 

Whereas Bode Miller has skied in every World Cup race over 

the last three seasons; 

Whereas Bode Miller’s career accomplishments include the 

2003–2004 World Cup giant slalom title, six World Cup 

victories in 2004, two gold medals and a silver medal at 

the 2003 World Alpine Ski Championships, two Olympic 

silver medals, and six U.S. National Championships gold 

medals; and 

Whereas Bode Miller’s 2004–2005 championship season 

helped the entire U.S. Ski Team complete its most successful season ever by finishing second in the final 2005 

Nations Cup standings: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That the Congress— 

3 (1) congratulates Bode Miller for winning the 

4 2004–2005 World Cup overall title in Alpine skiing 
3 

•SCON 22 IS

1 and establishing himself as the top alpine skier in 

2 the world; and 

3 (2) directs the Secretary of the Senate to make 

4 available an enrolled copy of this resolution to Bode 

5 Miller. 

Æ
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 20-0005

IN REPETITION OF JOHN C.BOYD FOR CONDITIONALADMISSION TO THEBAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA. 

# ALED JUN 30 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State nf Montana ORDER

John C. Boyd has petitioned for conditional admission to the practice of law in Montana. Boyd is applying for employment with the Missoula Office ofthe Montana Public Defender, and seeks conditional or temPorary admission to practice until he can complete the process ofadmission by motion. He will complete the process upon taking the MontanaLaw Seminar,but"believes conditional early admission would strengthen his candidacy for that position or any other attorney positions that may become available before the Montana Law Seminar scheduled to be held on July 30,2020." Wepreviously waived the requirement thatBoyd sitfor the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam. We have routinely denied such petitions for temporary admission. See Petition of Gosch, 07-0303, issued March 7, 2016. We have explained that the Court has made substantial revisions to the rules of admission over the past several years to open and streamline the process ofentering the practice oflaw in Montana by admission on inotion or by transfer of a UBE score. Those rules are now in effect and applicants are being processed routinely. The Court's intention was that the implementation of these rule revisions would eliminate the necessity for consideration ofmany ofthe ad hocpetitions for temporary admission or for waiver ofadmission requirements thatwerereceived in the past. Granting temporary admission as a matter of course to lawyers intending to seek admission on motion or admission by UBE score transfer would burden the Court and Clerk ofCourt with duplicative consideration and processing ofeach applicant. Further, no system exists to formally monitorthose who are admittedtemporarily to ensurethey are 06/30/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0005advancing their intention to be admitted on motion or have remained in the employment

for which they sought admission. Because rules now exist for the expeditious admission ofqualified candidates to the practice oflaw in Montana,we decline to pursue a practice ofgranting temporary admission to applicants who intend to seek admission thereunder. As we stated in Petition ofGosch, "Temporary admission until sitting for the bar exam may be appropriate in circumstances where a candidate does not qualify for admission on motion or for transfer ofa UBE score." Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for conditional admission to the practice oflaw is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this it day ofJune,2020.

ChiefJustice

Justices
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2558 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2558

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-ethylhexyl (4-chloro-2-
                        methylphenoxy) acetate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

  Mr. Burris introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-ethylhexyl (4-chloro-2-
                        methylphenoxy) acetate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-ETHYLHEXYL (4-CHLORO-2-METHYLPHENOXY) ACETATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.54 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-ethylhexyl (4-chloro-2-
methylphenoxy) acetate) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-19180, 33-89896, 33-25244 and
33-87626 of Analysts International Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated February 13, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to the change in the method of accounting for goodwill and certain intangibles in 2002), incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Analysts International Corporation for the year ended December 28, 2002.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Minneapolis,
Minnesota
March 21, 2003

---

QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST

OF S.C.B., JR.,

A CHILD.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00117-CV

Appeal from the

383rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2016DCM6044)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in that 

part of the judgment awarding retroactive child support. We therefore reverse that part of the trial 

court’s judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings related to the 

retroactive child support issue. We further order that the remainder of the judgment of the court 

below is affirmed.

It appearing to this Court that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes 

no other order with respect thereto. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2019.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
**Individual Feedback (2024)***

**Unit Location:**

**Date:**

***This checklist is optional. It is used to provide unit leadership with honest feedback. There are no right or wrong answers. All individual feedback is consolidated and provided to unit and state leadership anonymously.**

***On a scale from 0 (not) to 10 (extremely), rank your motivation to work here.***

***On a scale from 0 (none) to 10 (total transformation), rank the amount of change you have seen.***

***On a scale from 0 (not) to 10 (extremely), how included do you feel.***

***On a scale from 0 (not) to 10 (extremely), how well do you fit with the culture?***

***On a scale from 0 (none) to 10 (full), what level of support do you receive?***

Individual Feedback	3	Revised April 2024

# image1.png
Exhibit
4.1


 


	CERTIFICATE
    NUMBER	SHARES


 


REBORN
COFFEE, INC.


INCORPORATED
UNDER THE LAWS OF DELAWARE


COMMON
STOCK


SEE
REVERSE FOR

CERTAIN DEFINITIONS


 


	This Certifies that
    

    is the owner of	CUSIP 75618M
    107


 


FULLY
PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE CLASS A SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF THE PAR


VALUE
OF $0.0001 EACH OF


REBORN
COFFEE, INC.


 


transferable
on the books of the Company in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.


 


This
certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

Witness the facsimile seal of the Company and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


 


Dated:


 


	 	 	 
	PRESIDENT	 	SECRETARY


 


The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written
out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:


 


	TEN COM
    –	as tenants in common	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - _____ Custodian
    ______
	TEN ENT
    –	as tenants by the entireties	(Cust)
    (Minor)
	JT TEN
    –	as joint tenants with right
    of survivorship	under
    Uniform Gifts to Minors
	 	and not as tenants in common	Act ______________
	 	 	(State)


 


Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.


Reborn
Coffee, Inc.


For
value received, ___________________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


 


	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY
    OR OTHER
	IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE


 


	 
	(PLEASE
    PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)
	 
	 
	 
	 


shares
of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney


	 



 


to
transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Company with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


Dated
_________________


 


	 	 
	Notice:	The signature
    to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the certificate in every particular, without alteration
    or enlargement or any change whatever.
	 	 


Signature(s)
Guaranteed:


	 	 
	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE
    GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP
    IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15).
Exhibit
24.2
 
 CERTIFICATE
 
 I, Steven
L. Frey, hereby certify that I am the Secretary of Angelica Corporation, a
Missouri corporation, with its principal office in the County of St. Louis,
State of Missouri, and as such in charge of its corporate records, including
minutes of meetings of its shareholders and Board of Directors.
 
 I further
certify that the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the following
resolutions under date of February 22, 2005, which resolutions have not since
been amended or rescinded and are in full force and effect at the date
hereof:
 
 “FURTHER RESOLVED, That Stephen M. O’Hara, Steven
L. Frey, Richard M. Fiorillo and James W. Shaffer, or any of them, are hereby
authorized to do all acts and things and to execute any and all instruments on
behalf of the Company, including the execution of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended January 29, 2005, or any amendment thereto, relating to compliance with
the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which said
attorneys, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable to enable the Company
to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and any rules, regulations
and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect
thereof;
 
 FURTHER
RESOLVED, That this Board of Directors does approve the execution by the
directors and officers of the Company or any of them, of a Power of Attorney in
favor of Stephen M. O’Hara, Steven L. Frey, Richard M. Fiorillo and James W.
Shaffer, or any of them (with power of substitution in each), empowering such
attorneys, or any of them, to do all acts and things and to execute any and all
instruments on behalf of such directors and officers, including the execution of
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29,
2005 and all amendments thereto, which such attorneys, or any of them, may deem
necessary or advisable to enable the Company to comply with the reporting
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect
thereof.”
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
corporation this 14th day of April, 2005.
 
 
 /s/
      Steven L. FreySteven
      L. FreySecretary
 
 
 [SEAL]