alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

CHAIR’S NOTICE – Chairman E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Visit www.NIGC.gov to learn more about the NIGC 3 For 35 Project— a 

year-long project emphasizing the importance of conversations among 

the tribal gaming regulatory community about workforce preparedness.

Date: 3 November, 2022

RE: November NTTM – Fee calculation

An important topic the Agency has given significant attention to

in recent years is NIGC’s efforts for more efficient and clear

calculation of an operation’s fee payments. During an NIGC

monthly training event today I shared my four insights in this

area:

• Promotional free play

- NIGC began to clarify regulations on deducting

promotional free play from assessable gross revenue

calculation in the summer of 2020. The new regulations

and an Agency commitment to provide uniform training

resulted from Tribes during information requests and

consultation.

• NIGC fee

- In setting the annual fee, the Commission considers a

number of factors including NIGC self-sufficiency, the

importance of providing value while meeting its

statutory responsibility, and the importance of the

resilient economic opportunity Indian gaming

represents. These considerations became particularly

important during the pandemic, when NIGC received no

supplemental funding for its regulatory operations and

lost nearly half its transition fund necessary to

maintain continuity of operations (a prudent Agency

fiscal practice).

• Accounting practices

- The attention professional governing bodies are giving

to new standards and advisories for accounting

practices related to revenue classifications is

contributing to change in the gaming regulatory

community’s professional disciplines. These changes

require the NIGC to remain knowledgeable about

professional practices and how tribes’ operations are

structuring their business in light of these

standards.
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

CHAIR’S NOTICE – Chairman E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Visit www.NIGC.gov to learn more about the NIGC 3 For 35 Project— a 

year-long project emphasizing the importance of conversations among 

the tribal gaming regulatory community about workforce preparedness.

• Pandemic recovery

- Financial and accounting staffs’ roles at tribal

operations remain valuable as tribes navigate an

economic recovery from the pandemic and contemplate

how the industry can best adjust to rapidly evolving

operations since the pandemic.

I was grateful to the nearly 500 attendees today and NIGC

subject matter experts, Paul Bycroft and David Privatsky, for

their presentation. I look forward to future training topics

including upcoming NIGC National Virtual Cyber Security

Conference, a NIGC Symposium on the Bank Secrecy Act, and a

National Training Topic of the Month on facility license

submissions. More information can be found on these events and

other training opportunities by visiting www.NIGC.gov.

###
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of eTotalSource (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank J. Orlando,
      Chief Restructuring Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





July
      31,
      2008


/s/
                Frank J. OrlandoFrank
                J. OrlandoChief
                  Restructuring Officer and
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
  16
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.3

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Sandra B. Cochran, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Books-A-Million, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the periods presented in this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: April 28, 2005

                                      /s/ Sandra B. Cochran
                                      ------------------------------
                                      Sandra B. Cochran
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Nikolai Gecetchkori, Appellant, v Anthony J. Annucci, as Deputy Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

Submitted November 22, 2010;

decided February 22, 2011

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10382 Conference Calendar

__________________ PAUL LOUIS HARRELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BONNIE HILL; FRED HILL; JANE DOE Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:95-CV-001-X

- - - - - - - - - - December 20, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Paul Harrelson appeals from the district court's order denying his application for leave to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Harrelson's action in filing this lawsuit violated an injunction issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the lawsuit.No. 95-10382 -2- Harrelson's brief is wholly without merit, rendering the appeal frivolous. We caution Harrelson that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Harrelson is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court.
APPEAL DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 106 (Thursday, June 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13177]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME:  Friday, June 12, 2009; 9:30 a.m. EDT.

PLACE:  624 9th St., NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Briefing Agenda

    Topic: Health Disparities.
I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman.
II. Speakers' Presentations.
III. Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director.
IV. Adjourn Briefing.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.
I. Approval of Agenda.
II. Approval of Minutes of May 15, 2009 Meeting.
III. Announcements.
IV. Staff Director's Report.
V. Program Planning.
    <bullet> Discussion of 2009 Statutory Report.
VI. Management & Operations.
    <bullet> Motion Regarding Evaluation of Staff Director Performance 
(Melendez).
    <bullet> Motion Regarding Staff Director's Provision of Quarterly 
Financial Reports to Commission (Melendez).
    <bullet> Motion Regarding Commission Preparation of a Public 
Service Announcement (Melendez).
    <bullet> Motion Regarding Review and Standardization of Agency 
Regulations, Administrative Instructions and Other Practices 
(Melendez).
VII. State Advisory Committee Issues.
    <bullet> California SAC.
    <bullet> New Hampshire SAC.
VIII. Future Agenda Items.
IX. Adjourn.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:  Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting 
Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: June 2, 2009.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-13177 Filed 6-2-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
J. 

The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5). 

Accordingly, we approve attorney Kirk Reynolds's resignation. SCR 

98(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted. 

It is so ORDERED. 

•-&43; , C.J. 

Hardesty 

PPanIrranguaiiirrrrer. 

J. 

Douglas 

Gibbons 

J. 

cc: David A. Clark, Bar Counsel 

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

Kirk Reynolds 

Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

2
#### John L. Bell, Individually and as Shareholder of Norpco Restaurant, Inc. and Butcher Block of Albany, Inc., Appellant, v David R. White et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 28, 2011;

decided May 10, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                     Subsidiaries of COMFORCE Corporation

The following is a complete list of all of the subsidiaries of COMFORCE
Corporation with jurisdiction of incorporation indicated thereby.

1.   COMFORCE Operating, Inc. (Delaware)
2.   COMFORCE Technical Services, Inc. (Delaware)
3.   COMFORCE Telecom, Inc. (Delaware)
4.   SUMTEC Corporation (Delaware)
5.   Uniforce Services, Inc. (New York)
6.   PrO Unlimited, Inc. (New York)
7.   Uniforce Staffing Services, Inc. (New York)
8.   Uniforce Payrolling Services, Inc. (New York)
9.   UTS of Delaware, Inc. (Delaware)
10.  Labforce of America, Inc. (New York)
11.  Uniforce MIS Services of Georgia, Inc. (Georgia)
12.  Uniforce Information Services of Texas, Inc. (New York)
13.  COMFORCE Information Technologies, Inc. (New York)
14.  Temporary Help Industry Servicing Co., Inc. (New York)
15.  Professional Staffing Funding & Support, Inc. (New York)
16.  Brentwood Service Group, Inc. (New York)
17.  Computer Consultants Funding & Support, Inc. (New York)
18.  Thisco of Canada, Inc. (New York)
19.  Camelot Consulting Group, Inc. (New Jersey)
20.  Camelot Communications Group, Inc. (New Jersey)
21.  Camelot Control Group, Inc. (New Jersey)
22.  Camelot Group, Inc. (New Jersey)
23.  PrO Services, Inc. (Delaware)
24.  PrO Unlimited Services, Inc. (Delaware)
25.  COMFORCE Technical Administrative Services, Inc. (New York)
26.  Uniforce Payrolling Tri-State, Inc.  (New York)
27.  Gerri G. Inc. (New York)
28.  G.M.G. Resources, Inc. (New York)
29.  Clinical Labforce of America, Inc. (New York)
30.  Brentwood Canada, Inc. (New York)
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7821** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TREADWAY LEVON MANNING, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. Cameron McGowan Currie , Senior District Judge. ( 4:97

- cr - 00323

- CMC

- 1; 4:15

- cv - 04354

- CMC )

Submitted : February 23, 2016 Decided: February 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Treadway Levon Manning, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolin a, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Treadway Levon Manning , Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motio n . The order is not appealabl e unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion st ates a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Manning has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Manning’s motion for a certificate o f appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
INTER
PARFUMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES





Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an
officer of Inter Parfums, Inc., that the Quarterly Report of Inter Parfums, Inc.
on Form 10-Q for the period ended  June 30, 2010, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Inter Parfums,
Inc.





Date:
      August 9, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Jean MadarJean
      Madar,Chief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Inter Parfums, Inc. and will be retained by Inter Parfums, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 205 (Monday, October 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 54988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25615]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2232-570]


Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC; Notice of Availability of Final 
Environmental Assessment

October 16, 2009.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 
as amended, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 
18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the Commission has 
reviewed an application, filed June 18, 2009, for non-project use of 
project lands and waters at the Catawba-Wateree Project, FERC Project 
No. 2232. The licensee seeks Commission approval to permit the City of 
Lenoir, North Carolina to construct a new raw water intake at Lake 
Rhodhiss. The Environmental Assessment (EA) analyzes the environmental 
impacts of the proposed construction and operation of the new intake 
facility and concludes that approval of the application, with 
appropriate environmental measures, would not constitute a major 
federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment. The project is located on the Catawba and Wateree Rivers 
in North and South Carolina.
    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Energy Projects, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission). A copy of the EA is 
attached to a Commission order titled ``Order Approving Non-Project Use 
of Project Lands and Waters: Construction of Raw Water Intake'' issued 
October 16, 2009, and is on file with the Commission and is available 
for public inspections. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the 
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number 
field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online 
Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#50161502131f3e3c393e35032520203f222410363522337e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a7c7f687975545653545f694f4a4a55484e7a5c5f4859145d554c">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-3372, 
or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-25615 Filed 10-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 931.

#### North Electric Manufacturing Co. *v.*National Labor Relations Board.

March 16, 1942.

*Messrs. Arthur D. Baldwin*and *Clare M. Vrooman*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Fahy*and *Messrs. Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gloss,*and *Morris P. Glushien*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 290 

To repeal a requirement with respect to the procurement and acquisition 

of alternative fuels. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 21, 2009 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. COBURN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To repeal a requirement with respect to the procurement 

and acquisition of alternative fuels. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL. 

4 Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security 

5 Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17142) is repealed. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
#### State v. Williamson

Case below: 175 N.C. App. 796

No. 139P06-2

Def’s Motion for “Petition for Discretionary Review” (COA05-290)

Dismissed 10/11/07
-Exhibit 32-1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Financial Report of NoFire Technologies Inc.,
Inc. on Form 10QSB for the quarter ended 11/30/2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Sam Gottfried, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10KQSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: January 22,2008
Name  /s/ Sam Gottfried (CEO)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
 the signature that  appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written  statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to NoFire Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by NoFire
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.







Exhibit 32-2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Financial Report of NoFire Technologies Inc.,
Inc. on Form 10QSB for the Quarter ended 11/30/2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Sam Oolie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and


(2) The information contained in the Form 10KSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: January 22, 2008

Name  /s/ Sam Oolie (CFO)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that  appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written  statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to NoFire Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by NoFire
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.