alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NWCG Fire Training and Incident Qualifications

Employee Name:

IFPM Position: Prescribed Fire and Fuels Specialist (Low Complexity)

NWCG Incident Management Qualifications

Primary Core Requirement: Engine Boss (ENGB) OR Crew Boss (CRWB) OR Firing 

Boss (FIRB) OR Helicopter (HMGB)

Secondary Core Requirement: Incident Commander, Type 4 (ICT4)

The purpose of this form is to help identify required and developmental training for the 

NWCG Incident Management Qualification Standards for this position. The required 

training includes the IFPM “Additional Required Training” and the required training for 

the Incident Command Positions (ICS) and/or the Wildland Fire Positions based on the 

2009 Wildland Fire Qualification System Guide (PMS 310-1). Employees should refer 

to individual agency requirements.

Course 

Number

Course Name Training 

Needed

Training 

Completed

Estimated 

Cost

Required Training

S-200 Initial Attack Incident Commander

S-230 Crew Boss (Single Resource)

S-290 Intermediate Wildland Fire Behavior

A-110 Aviation Transportation of Hazardous 

Materials

S-372 Helicopter Manager

Suggested Developmental Training

L-280 Followership to Leadership

L-380 Fireline Leadership

S-215 Fire Operations in the Wildland/Urban 

Interface

S-234 Ignition Operations

S-390 Introduction to Wildland Fire Behavior 

Calculations

S-490 Advanced Fire Behavior Calculations

S-491 Intermediate National Fire Danger 

Rating System

RX-301 Prescribed Fire Implementation

RX-310 Introduction to Fire Effects

RX-341 Prescribed Fire Plan Preparation

RX-410 Smoke Management Techniques
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund V, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





Date: March 22, 2011/s/ Paritosh K. ChoksiParitosh K. ChoksiExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer ofATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-4.5



 





Exhibit 4.5



Specimen
Certificate
for Units



[Front of Certificate]








 








 





[Reverse of Certificate]





     The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TEN
COM 


TEN ENT

	 	—


—
	 	as tenants in common


as tenants by the entireties
	 	 
	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT—
	 	                     Custodian                     

     (Cust)                            (Minor)
	
JT TEN

	 	
—
	 	
as joint tenants with right of
survivorship and not as tenants
in common
	 	 	 	 	 	under Uniform Transfers to Minors

Act
                                                     

                       
     (State)






Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.




     FOR VALUE RECEIVED                                                                                                                          hereby sell, assign and transfer unto



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 





 
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)




 





 




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Units represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Attorney to transfer the said Stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full
power of substitution in the premises.




Dated                                                             




	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	NOTICE:

	 	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF
THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE
GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND
LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN
AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM),
PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.	 	 





KEEP THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN, MUTILATED OR DESTROYED, THE
CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND OF INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION TO THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT
CERTIFICATE.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 1 0

- 4 0 7 0 9 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,
P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v

.
H U G O E S P I N O Z A

- G O N Z A L E Z , a l s o k n o w n a s J o e l A l b e r t E s p i n o z a ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l s f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 4 : 0 9

- C R

- 2 1 7

- 1

B e f o r e R E A V L E Y , D E N N I S , a n d C L E M E N T , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t H u g o E s p i n o z a
G o n z a l e z h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e

w i t h A n d e r s v

. C a l i f

o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 ) , a n d U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. F l o r e s , 6 3 2
F

. 3 d 2 2 9 ( 5 t h C i r

. 2 0 1 1 )

. E s p i n o z a
- G o n z a l e z h a s f i l e d a r e s p o n s e

. T h e r e c o r d
i s i n s u f f i c i e n t l y d e v e l o p e d t o a l l o w c o n s i d e r a t i o n a t t h i s t i m e o f E s p i n o z a
G o n z a l e z ’ s c l a i m o f i n e f f e c t i v e a s s i s t a n c e o f c o u n s e l ; s u c h a c l a i m g e n e r a l l y

“ c a n n o t b e r e s o l v e d o n d i r e c t a p p e a l w h e n t h e c l a i m h a s n o t b e e n r a i s e d b e f o r e U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 16 , 20 11
Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40709 Document: 00511510762 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2011N o

. 1 0

- 4 0 7 0 9

t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t s i n c e n o o p p o r t u n i t y e x i s t e d t o d e v e l o p t h e r e c o r d o n t h e m e r i t s

o f t h e a l l e g a t i o n s

. ” U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. C a n t w e l l , 4 7 0 F

. 3 d 1 0 8 7 , 1 0 9 1 ( 5 t h C i r

. 2 0 0 6 ) ( i n t e r n a l q u o t a t i o n m a r k s a n d c i t a t i o n o m i t t e d )

. W e h a v e r e v i e w e d

c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f s a n d t h e r e l e v a n t p o r t i o n s o f t h e r e c o r d r e f l e c t e d t h e r e i n , a s w e l l

a s E s p i n o z a
- G o n z a l e z ’ s r e s p o n s e

. W e c o n c u r w i t h c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t t h a t t h e

a p p e a l p r e s e n t s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e l l a t e r e v i e w

. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e

m o t i o n f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r

r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 10-40709 Document: 00511510762 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2011
No. 862.

#### Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. *v.*Federal Power Commission.

February 16, 1942.

*Messrs. Walter C. Clephane, Charles Markell,*and *Arthur H. Clephane*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea,*and *Messrs. Melvin H. Siegel, Richard J. Connor,*and *Wallace H. Walker*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
#### Helen A. CHAGNON v. William J. GRIFFITHS, Jr.

Civ. A. No. 54-186.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

March 9, 1955.

Kenneth Hurwitch, Scituate, Mass., Harry Bergson, Jr., Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Anthony Julian, U. S. Atty., William J. Koen, Asst. U. S. Atty., Boston, Mass., for defendant.

ALDRICH, District Judge.

This motion raises a question under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq. The plaintiff, injured by an automobile driven by a now alleged member of the United States Selective Service while in the course of his duties on government business, sued the driver individually in the state court. The defendant removed it here under 50 U.S.C. § 738. The plaintiff moves to add the United States as a party defendant, and to add a corresponding second count to her complaint.

I do not question the general right of the plaintiff to add the government as a party, ’as distinguished from instituting a separate suit. Cf. United States v. Yellow Cab Co., 340 U.S. 543, 71 S.Ct. 399, 95 L.Ed. 523; United States v. Vernon Cab Co., D.C.Mass., 125 F.Supp. 335. I am more concerned with the question of the right of the plaintiff to sue the driver and the United States in one action, now that the government may be the only party ultimately liable.1 Cf. United States v. Gilman, 347 U.S. 507, 74 S.Ct. 695, 98 L.Ed. 898.

 While ordinary claims against a principal and an agent could be joined in one action I am unwilling, where, as here, I have discretion, to have this case proceed against the United States and the driver jointly. If the plaintiff files a motion to dismiss against the driver within 10 days, I will allow the motion to add the United States as a party, subject to service of process, etc., and then dismiss against the driver. Otherwise the motion to add the United States will be denied.

1

. This is not necessarily so. For one thing, the proof at the trial might show the government not liable because the driver was not its agent, but leave the driver liable personally. However, the United States Attorney removed the case, and the government apparently expects it may be liable, if anyone is. See also 28 U.S.C. § 2676; cf. Moon v. Price, 5 Cir., 213 F.2d 794.
FIRE MANAGEMENT BOARD

FMB Memorandum 19-002

May 24, 2019

TO: Fire Management Board Members Digitally signed by GRANT GRANT BEEBE 

Date: 2019.05.24 

FROM: Grant Beebe, Chair, FMB Executive Board BEEBE 08:48:24 -06'00'

SUBJECT: Interagency Fire Program Management (IFPM) Decision Paper #7: Change to M-581 

Fire Program Management course for Unit Fire Program Manager Positions and 

General Updates

The attached decision paper is the result of an agency request to modify the M-581 Fire Program 

Management course from a condition of hire (selective placement factor) to a condition of employment 

for Unit Fire Program Manager (UFPM) Positions. The DOI Bureaus will administer the M-581 

training requirement for Unit Fire Program Managers as a condition of employment required to be 

completed within one year of entry on duty.

National Incident Management System: Wildland Fire Qualification System Guide (PMS 310-1) 

changes have also resulted in modification to parts of the IFPM standard and are identified in the 

General Updates section of this document and IFPM Position Matrix (attached).

FMB fully supports and remains committed to the IFPM Standard and will continue to maintain the 

IFPM standard to ensure it meets the needs of the federal agencies. If you have any questions regarding

this decision, please contact your agency IFPM Fire Representative. This decision paper can also be

found on the IFPM website: http://www.ifpm.nifc.gov/.

Attachments: Decision Paper # 7: Change to M-581 Fire Program Management course for Unit Fire

Program Manager Positions; General Updates; and IFPM Qualifications Matrix

Distribution:

Interagency Fire Program Management Group
Facilities Work Request 

If an URGENT maintenance need, please call: extension 5538 

Email completed form to: Workrequest@blm.gov 

Is the work: REPAIR of EXISTING, Complete Part A 

(Check One) NEW WORK, Complete Part A and B 

Budget: $ 

Approving Official: 

Part A: 

Requestor Information: 

Name: Phone/Email: 

Date Submitted: Date Required: 

Building #/Name: Room #/Location: 

Summary of request: 

Part B: 

General: 

Requester’s estimated budget (confirmed): 

Number of FTE (non-telework) workstations: 

Number of Telework Employees: 

Number of spaces for Kiosk Hoteliers: 

Other personnel/agencies affected by request: 

Standard Equipment Needs:

Fax(s): Printer(s): Plotter(s): TV(s): 

Specialty Equipment Needs:

NIFC Form 9100-2 

Page 1 of 2 

(Revised) September 2019 

AV: Vertical Storage: Security Door: Other: 
 

 

Facilities Department use only: 

Facilities use only for  NEW WORK 

HVAC: IT/Phone: Power/Electrical: Security: 

Carpet: Paint: Lighting: Ceiling: 

NIFC approving official for change of Area Assigned to Agency: 

Signature of Division Chief of Support Services Date 

Facilities use only for  REPAIR of EXISTING: 

Assigned to: Date Assigned: 

Number: Contractor Cost: 

Staff Hours spent: Date Completed: 

Cost of Materials: Priority: 

Comments (5 lines Maximum): 

NIFC Form 9100-2 

Page 2 of 2 

(Revised) September 2019
EXHIBIT 99.1





Certification Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Catalina Lighting,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Varakian, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b) The information contained in the Report
presents fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Chief Executive Officer



|                   
|-------------------
|/s/ Robert Varakian
|Robert Varakian    



Date: February 14, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2500 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2500

        To suspend temporarily the duty on p-fluorobenzaldehyde.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on p-fluorobenzaldehyde.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. P-FLUOROBENZALDEHYDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       p-                  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          Fluorobenzaldehyd                                                  31/2011.......
                          e (CAS No. 459-57-
                          4) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2913.00.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Scott Martzloff et al., Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Victoria Martzloff, an Infant, Appellants, v Rush-Henrietta Central School District, Respondent.

Submitted March 28, 2011;

decided May 3, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit 21.1 

 

CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION 

SUBSIDIARIES OFTHE COMPANY 

 

The following are certain wholly-owned ormajority-owned direct or indirect subsidiaries of Credence Systems Corporation as of December 31, 2004: 

 

Credence Capital Corporation, a California corporation; 

 

Credence Europa Limited, a private limited company in the United Kingdom; 

 

Credence International Limited, Inc., a Delaware corporation; 

 

Credence Systems Europe GmbH, a German corporation; 

 

Credence Systems KK, a Japanese company; 

 

Credence Systems Korea, a South Korea company; 

 

Credence-SZ Systems GmbH, a German corporation; 

 

Credence France SARL, a French company; 

 

Optonics, Inc., a California corporation; 

 

NPTest Credence Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation; 

 

NPTest, Inc., a Delaware corporation; 

 

NPTest International Ltd., a British Virgin Islands limited company; 

 

NPTest (Philippines) inc., a Philippines corporation; 

 

NPTest Pte Ltd., a Singapore limited company; 

 

NPTest UK Ltd., a United Kingdom limited company; 

 

NPTest SRL, an Italian company; and 

 

NPTest SAS, a French company.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**50 KA 08-02408**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CLEMON JONES, ALSO KNOWN AS CLEMENT/CLEMONT JONES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MATTHEW DUNHAM OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Teresa D. Johnson, A.J.), rendered October 29, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same Memorandum as in People v Jones (___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 14, 2014]).

Entered: February 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
September 20, 2021

Summary of Proposed Topics related to 25 C.F.R. Part 514 – Fees

National Indian Gaming Commission

The National Indian Gaming Commission seeks tribal input, feedback, and suggestions 

concerning amending 25 C.F.R. Part 514 – Fees – to respond to lessons learned from the 

pandemic’s impact. The Commission anticipates that consultation on this topic will lead to 

additional dialogue with tribes and industry stakeholders which will inform potential drafts of 

specific proposed regulatory changes.

1) The Commission proposes exploring options for including a mechanism within the 

NIGC fee regulations to adjust the assessed fiscal year in response to extreme and unexpected 

variations in assessable gross revenues. The assessed fiscal year is defined by NIGC fee 

regulations as the gaming operation’s fiscal year ending prior to January 1 of the year the 

Commission adopted fee rates. This definition is intended to result in all gaming operations 

applying the same fiscal year’s audited revenues to the same fee rate, but it also results in at least 

a calendar year transpiring between the end of the assessed fiscal year and a fee payment

calculated using that fiscal year. Thus, during the pandemic, fee payments were calculated using 

pre-pandemic assessed fiscal years and post-pandemic, fee payments will be calculated using 

pandemic impacted assessed fiscal years. The Commission seeks tribal input, feedback, and 

suggestions on a mechanism to adjust the assessed fiscal year to address these concerns in 

response to extreme and unexpected variations in assessable gross revenues.

2) The Commission proposes mandating a process for reporting on the amounts the 

NIGC has available to carry over at fiscal year-end. The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act provides 

that fees “shall be available to carry out the duties of the Commission, to remain available until 

expended.” 25 U.S.C. § 2717a. In addition, the Commission proposes requiring that NIGC 

budget commitments maintain a two-quarter transition fund. This reporting and budget 

requirement is intended to better inform tribes of the NIGC budget and to better prepare the 

NIGC for unexpected budgetary impacts.

3) The Commission proposes revising the fee regulations to incentivize electronic 

submission of fee payments, provide for flexibility in quarterly payments under certain 

circumstances, and provide guidelines for the fee rate calculation for self-regulated tribes. The 

Commission believes that increased adoption of electronic submission of fee payments will 

result in administrative cost savings for both the NIGC and tribal gaming operations and seeks 

tribal input on a means to incentivize electronic payment adoption. The Commission further 

proposes exploring options for providing gaming operations with increased flexibility in the 

timing of the quarterly payments in response to extreme industry-wide impacts such as the global 

pandemic. Finally, the Commission seeks tribal input on fee rate calculations for self-regulated 

tribe and whether additional guidance or regulatory changes are warranted to incentivize selfregulation.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Quandell Williams, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 885]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mondo, J.), imposed January 10, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

*981The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive *(see People v*Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; *People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; *People v Stokes,*109 AD3d 1016, 1017 [2013]). Eng, EJ., Mastro, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.
GGR Trending FY00 – FY20

$11.0

$12.8

$14.7

$16.8

$19.5

$22.6

$24.9

$26.1

$26.7 $26.5 $26.5 $27.2

$27.9 $28.0 $28.5

$29.9

$31.2

$32.4

$33.7

$34.6

$27.8

$0.0

$5.0

$10.0

$15.0

$20.0

$25.0

$30.0

$35.0

FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20