alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52125)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Deferred
Compensation  and Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee  Directors,  in the
Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  2-95022)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc.  Amended Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees,  in the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-32612)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Employee
Savings  Plan,  in the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  33-26101)
pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.   Long-Term   Incentive   Plan,  in  the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.  33-55922)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc. 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-49907) pertaining to the Ashland Inc. Leveraged Employee Stock Ownership
Plan, in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-62901)  pertaining to
the Ashland Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, in the Registration  Statement
(Form  S-8  No.  333-33617)  pertaining  to the  Ashland  Inc.  1997  Stock
Incentive  Plan, in the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-3 No.  333-78675)
pertaining  to the  registration  of 68,925  shares of Ashland Inc.  Common
Stock, in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-36842) pertaining to
the  registration  of 96,600 shares of Ashland Inc.  Common  Stock,  in the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-54762)   pertaining  to  the
registration  of  149,300  shares of  Ashland  Inc.  Common  Stock,  in the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  333-82830)   pertaining  to  the
registration  of  265,100  shares of  Ashland  Inc.  Common  Stock,  in the
Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-54766)  pertaining to the Amended
and Restated Ashland Inc. Incentive Plan, and in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-70651) pertaining to the offering of $600,000,000 of Debt
Securities,   Preferred  Stock,  Depository  Shares,  Common  Stock  and/or
Warrants of Ashland Inc., of our report dated  February 18, 2003,  relating
to the financial  statements of Marathon Ashland  Petroleum LLC included in
this  Annual  Report  (Form  10-K/A  Amendment  No.  1) for the year  ended
September 30, 2002.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Houston, TX

March 20, 2003
Proclamation 8389 of June 2, 2009

# African-American Music Appreciation Month, 2009

The legacy of African-American composers, singers, songwriters, and musicians is an indelible piece of our Nation’s culture. Generations of African Americans have carried forward the musical traditions of their forebears, blending old styles with innovative rhythms and sounds. They have enriched American music and captured the diversity of our Nation. During African-American Music Appreciation Month, we honor this rich heritage.

This legacy tells a story of ingenuity and faith. Amidst the injustice of slavery, African Americans lifted their voices to the heavens through spirituals. This religious music united African Americans and helped sustain them through one of the darkest periods in our Nation’s history. Years later, spirituals contributed to the advent of a new form of music: gospel. Both styles incorporated elements of African music and were rooted in faith.

The African-American music tradition also reflects creativity and individualism. Blues, jazz, soul, and rock and roll synthesize various musical traditions to create altogether new sounds. Their novel chord progressions, improvisation, and mood showcase individual musicians while also creating a cohesive musical unit. In addition, African-American composers have thrived in traditional genres such as musical theater, opera, classical symphony, and choral music, providing their unique imprint and creatively growing these forms of music. All of these contributions are treasured across America and the world.

During African-American Music Appreciation Month, we recall the known and unknown musicians who helped create this musical history. Their contributions help illuminate the human experience and spirit, and they help us reflect on our Nation’s ongoing narrative.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2009 as African-American Music Appreciation Month. I call upon public officials, educators, and all the people of the United States to observe this month with appropriate activities and programs that raise awareness and foster appreciation of music which is composed, arranged, and performed by African Americans.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this second day of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.



[FR Doc. E9-13408 Billing code 3195-W9-P
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT
M.S., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND

FAMILIES, Appellee. No. 2D23-1844 April 3, 2024 Appeal from the Department of Children and Families. M.S., pro se. No appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SILBERMAN, KELLY, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Sample Audit Checklist for CJIS Security Policy (CJISSECPOL) Area 14

# QUESTION YES NO N/A STANDARD COMMENT

Page 1 of 1

5.14 System and Services Acquisition (SA)1

1. Does the Tribe or TGRA replace system 

components when support for the components is 

no longer available from the developer, vendor, or 

manufacturer?

Exceptions to this requirement include systems 

that provide critical mission or business 

capabilities where newer technologies are not 

available or where systems are so isolated that 

installing replacement components is not an 

option. ____ ____ ____ SA 22, a

2. Does the Tribe or TGRA provide the following 

options for alternative sources for continued 

support for unsupported components: original 

manufacturer support, or original contracted 

vendor support?

If necessary, organizations can establish in-house 

support by developing customized patches for 

critical software components or, alternatively, 

obtain the services of external providers who 

provide on going support for the designated 

unsupported components through contractual 

relationships. 

____ ____ ____ SA 22, b

1 These requirements are sanctionable for audit beginning October 1, 2023.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3100 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3100

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the Little Wood River Ranch.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2010

 Mr. Risch (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the Little Wood River Ranch.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT INVOLVING LITTLE WOOD RIVER RANCH.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12063, the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the 
licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in accordance 
with the procedures of the Commission under that section--
            (1) extend the time period during which the licensee is 
        required to commence the construction of project works to the 
        end of the 3-year period beginning on the date of enactment of 
        this Act; or
            (2) if the license for Project No. 12063 has been 
        terminated, reinstate the license and extend the time period 
        during which the licensee is required to commence the 
        construction of project works to the end of the 3-year period 
        beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WAINSWORTH MARCELLUS HALL, a/k/a Unique,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CR-93-162, CA-98-215)

Submitted: June 30, 1999 Decided: August 5, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wainsworth Marcellus Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Wainsworth Marcellus Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Hall is entitled to no relief

under Richardson v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 67 U.S.L.W. 3682

(June 1, 1999) (No. 97-8629). The district court instructed the

jury at trial that it must unanimously agree on which acts constituted the continuing series of violations under 21 U.S.C.A.

§ 848 (West Supp. 1999). See United States v. Hall, 93 F.3d 126,

129 (4th Cir. 1996). Therefore, we deny Hall’s motions to stay the

appeal. We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Hall, Nos. CR-93-162; CA-98-215 (E.D. Va. Dec. 3, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IDM Pharma, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: November 14, 2006       /s/ Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne Dr. Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Steve Westlund
 Steve Westlund
 Chief Executive Officer, President
 and Chief Accounting Officer
 May 21, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         4,760
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16,062
<ALLOWANCES>                                   5,711
<INVENTORY>                                    26,134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               53,608
<PP&E>                                         24,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 92,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,478
<BONDS>                                        5,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       78
<OTHER-SE>                                     50,273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   92,092
<SALES>                                        131,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,946
<CGS>                                          106,143
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               21,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,631
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,262
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,369
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,369
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .30


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 18, 2009

jm 

# Order

September 18, 2009

139682 (3)

DAVID HARDY,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 139682 AGC: 0340/09; 0341/09 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive f ees is considered and it
is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisone r pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $6.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned
with this order. Failure to comply with this orde r shall result in the appeal not being
filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $369.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.
The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
First Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.7 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the Employment Agreement
dated May 1, 2007 between BEA Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Thomas M. Ashburn (“Employee”) (the “Agreement”) is effective as of November 1, 2007 (the “First Amendment
Effective Date”) (the “First Amendment”). 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee entered into the Agreement, pursuant to which the Employee was assigned certain tasks and assignments as set
forth in Attachment A annexed thereto; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire to extend the term of the Agreement (the
“Term”) in order to facilitate Employee’s efforts on behalf of the Company. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the
Employee agree as follows. 
 AGREEMENT 
  

	1.	The Term of the Agreement shall be and hereby is extended through January 31, 2008. 

  

	2.	The Employee shall work on the key projects indicated on Attachment B, annexed hereto. 

  


	3.	Nothing herein shall modify employee’s “at will” status of employment as set forth in the Agreement. 

  

	4.	The validity, interpretation, enforceability, and performance of this First Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and
shall becoming effective upon the First Amendment Effective Date. This First Amendment may not be modified, amended or terminated except by an instrument in writing, signed by the Employee and by a duly authorized representative of the Company other
than Employee. 

  

	5.	Employee acknowledges (i) that he has consulted with or has had the opportunity to consult with independent counsel of his own choice concerning this First Amendment and has
been advised to do so by the Company, and (ii) that he has read and understands the First Amendment, is fully aware of its legal effect, and has entered into it freely based on his own judgment. 

  

	6.	All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 

 The parties have duly executed this First Amendment as of the First Amendment Effective Date. 
  

					
	FOR BEA SYSTEMS, INC.:	 		 	
			
	/s/ Alfred Chuang	 		 	/s/ Thomas M. Ashburn
		 		 	Thomas M. Ashburn








 Attachment B - Projects 
  

	1.	Work with BID organization to help them maximize their support revenue and to help ensure we have a common set of support policies, discounts and procedures.


  

	 	a.	Analyze historical data. 

  

	 	b.	Develop recommendations. 

  

	 	c.	Ensure that the rapid growth in BID products translates into corresponding increase in support renewals. 

  

	2.	Work to increase channel leverage with specific focus on VAR’s and ISV’s. 

  

	 	a.	Develop customer segmentation model. 

  

	 	b.	Define the product overlays with in this segmentation model. 

  

	 	c.	Use information to set new & substantially larger goals for our channel.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Anaren, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George A. Blanton, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ George A. Blanton


George A. Blanton


Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer)


August 11, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Anaren, Inc. and will be retained by Anaren, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.