alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 106 (Thursday, June 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11709 and <greek-i>11710]


Minnesota Disaster Number MN-00020

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-1830-DR), dated 04/10/
2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 03/16/2009 and continuing through 05/22/2009.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/22/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/09/2009.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/11/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Minnesota, dated 04/10/2009 is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
03/16/2009 and continuing through 05/22/2009.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Roger B. Garland,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13031 Filed 6-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2960 

To exempt aliens who are admitted as refugees or granted asylum and 

are employed overseas by the Federal Government from the 1-year physical presence requirement for adjustment of status to that of aliens 

lawfully admitted for permanent residence, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2010 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself and Mr. LUGAR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To exempt aliens who are admitted as refugees or granted 

asylum and are employed overseas by the Federal Government from the 1-year physical presence requirement 

for adjustment of status to that of aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Refugee Opportunity 

5 Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2960 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO ONE-YEAR PHYSICAL PRESENCE RE2 QUIREMENT FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS 

3 FOR ALIENS GRANTED ASYLUM AND EM4 PLOYED OVERSEAS BY THE FEDERAL GOV5 ERNMENT. 

6 Section 209 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

7 (8 U.S.C. 1159) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a)(1)(B), by inserting ‘‘(ex9 cept as provided under subsection (d))’’ after ‘‘one 

10 year’’; 

11 (2) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting ‘‘(except 

12 as provided under subsection (d)),’’ after ‘‘asylum’’; 

13 and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(d) EXCEPTION TO 1-YEAR RESIDENCY REQUIRE16 MENT FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—An alien who does 

17 not meet the physical presence requirement under sub18 section (a)(1)(B) or (b)(2), but who otherwise meets the 

19 requirements under subsection (a) or (b) for adjustment 

20 of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for perma21 nent residence, shall be eligible for such adjustment of sta22 tus if the alien did not meet the 1-year physical presence 

23 requirement because the alien was employed outside of the 

24 United States by the Federal Government or by a con25 tractor of the Federal Government.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### KOONTZ v. KOONTZ.

No. 5877.

United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

April 1, 1941.

*375James R. Kirkland, and Nita S. Hinman, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

James E. Shifflette, of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

BAILEY, Justice.

This case came on to be heard upon the complaint, the answer and cross complaint of the defendant and the answer of the plaintiff to the cross complaint. No evidence was offered on behalf of either party, but the attorneys, after having stated that neither the plaintiff nor the defendant were domiciled in the District of Columbia, stated that the parties had come to an agreement as to the custody of their infant child and requested the court to enter the following judgment:

> ■ “This cause coming on for trial upon the complaint for maintenance of minor child filed by plaintiff, Helen R. Koontz, the answer and cross complaint for custody of the child filed by defendant, Edwin C. Koontz, father of said child, the Court, with knowledge of the prior order for custody of the child signed by the Court and filed in the case, and being advised by counsel for the respective parties to -the case of the desire of plaintiff to agree to a final judgment of the court awarding permanent custody of the minor to the defendant, Edwin C. Koontz, it is by the Court, this 10th day of March, 1941,

> “Ordered, that the complaint filed by the plaintiff is hereby dismissed, and it is

> “Further Ordered, that the custody of the minor child, Edwin C. Koontz, Jr., be and he is hereby awarded, permanently to the child’s father, Edwin C. Koontz, and it is

> “Further Ordered, that the plaintiff herein, Helen R. Koontz, shall have the company and presence of the said minor child with her on the first and third Sundays of each succeeding month hereafter from the hour of eight o’clock in' the morning until darkness in the evening of such Sundays, provided however, that without the prior consent of Edwin C. Koontz, the father, the said child shall not be removed out of the District of Columbia.”

 A court of equity has the power to enter a judgment for the custody of a minor as ancillary to a judgment for divorce or maintenance, or to appoint a guardian when the minor has property in the jurisdiction, (Lehmer v. Hardy, 54 App.D.C. 51, 294 F. 407, 3rd Pom.Eq.Jur. Sec. 1307) or perhaps as a temporary matter as a police protection, but otherwise it has no such power, certainly where the minor is not domiciled in the jurisdiction (3rd Pom.Eq.Jur. Sec. 1305). In this-case there is nothing to justify the proposed action of the court. The plaintiff has abandoned her suit for maintenance and the parties have agreed upon the custody of the infant.

Both the original and the cross complaints should be dismissed and the application to enter the agreed judgment denied.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2972 

To amend titles 18 and 28 of the United States Code to provide assistance 

to the Federal law enforcement agencies in investigating offenses involving child victims. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2010 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. VITTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend titles 18 and 28 of the United States Code to 

provide assistance to the Federal law enforcement agencies in investigating offenses involving child victims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Arresting Child Preda5 tors Act of 2010’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUBPOENA AUTHORITY. 

7 (a) ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENAS.—Section 3486 of 

8 title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2972 IS

1 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

2 (i) in subparagraph (A)— 

3 (I) by redesignating clause (ii) as 

4 clause (iii); 

5 (II) by striking clause (i) and in6 serting the following: 

7 ‘‘(i) a Federal health care offense, the Attorney 

8 General; 

9 ‘‘(ii) a Federal offense involving the sexual ex10 ploitation or abuse of children, the Attorney General, 

11 the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Post12 master General; or’’; and 

13 (III) in clause (iii), as so redesig14 nated, by striking ‘‘Secretary of the 

15 Treasury’’ and inserting ‘‘Secretary of 

16 Homeland Security’’; and 

17 (ii) in subparagraph (D), by inserting 

18 ‘‘, 2250’’ after ‘‘2243’’; 

19 (B) in paragraph (6)(A), by striking 

20 ‘‘United State’’ and inserting ‘‘United States’’; 

21 (C) in paragraph (9), by striking ‘‘para22 graph (1)(A)(i)(II) or (1)(A)(ii)’’ and inserting 

23 ‘‘paragraph (1)(A)(ii) or (1)(A)(iii)’’; and 

24 (D) in paragraph (10), by striking ‘‘para25 graph (1)(A)(ii), the Secretary of the Treasury’’ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2972 IS

1 and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)(A)(iii), the Sec2 retary of Homeland Security’’; and 

3 (2) in subsection (c)— 

4 (A) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘, in 

5 coordination with the Secretary of Homeland 

6 Security or the Postmaster General, as appro7 priate,’’ after ‘‘the Attorney General’’; and 

8 (B) in the second sentence, by striking 

9 ‘‘appear before the Attorney General’’ and in10 serting ‘‘appear before the Government officer 

11 that issued the subpoena’’. 

12 (b) UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE.—Section 

13 566(e)(1) of title 28, United States Code, is amended— 

14 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

15 the end; 

16 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period 

17 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

18 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(C) issue administrative subpoenas in accord20 ance with section 3486 of title 18.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

(i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                       |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------------------------- |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ David Wohlberg
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | David Wohlberg                       
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | President and Chief Operating Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21


                            FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE

     THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE made as of this 31st day of December, 1998
by and between HIALET ASSOCIATES, a Connecticut general partnership with a
principal place of business at 29 Haviland Street, South Norwalk, Connecticut
06854, and MICRO WAREHOUSE, INC., a Delaware corporation with a principal place
of business at 535 Connecticut Avenue, Norwalk, Connecticut 06854.

                                   WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into a Lease Agreement dated February
13, 1991, as amended, covering premises located at 53 Water Street, South
Norwalk, Connecticut (as amended, the "Lease"); and

     WHEREAS, the Lease expires on December 31, 1998; and

     WHEREAS, the parties wish to extend the term of the Lease on the terms set
forth below.

     NOW, THEREFORE, for One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration,
the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as
follows:

     1.   Paragraph 3 of said Lease Agreement is hereby amended to read as
          follows:

               "3. Term. The term of this Lease shall begin on February 13, 1991
               (the "Commencement Date") and end on December 31, 1999 (the
               "Termination Date")."

     2.   Paragraph 4(a) of said Lease Agreement is hereby amended by inserting
          at the end thereof the following:


<PAGE>

               "Beginning on January 1, 1999, the Rent shall be increased by ten
               percent (10%) to Seventy Eight Thousand Six Hundred Fifty and
               00/100 ($78,650.00) payable in equal monthly installments of
               $6,554.17 in advance on the first day of each calendar month."

     3.   Except as specifically set forth herein, in all other terms,
          conditions and provisions set forth in the Lease shall remain
          unchanged and in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement effective
the day and year first above written.

                                            HIALET ASSOCIATES

                                            By: /s/ Peter Godfrey
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Peter Godfrey, a Partner
                                               Hereunto Duly Authorized

MICRO WAREHOUSE, INC.

By: /s/ Bruce L. Lev
   ---------------------------------------
Bruce L. Lev, Its
Executive Vice President, Legal and Corporate Affairs
and General Counsel
Hereunto Duly Authorized



                                       2
Exhibit 21.1







Subsidiaries of COMFORCE Corporation





The following is a list of the subsidiaries of COMFORCE Corporation with jurisdiction of incorporation indicated thereby.





COMFORCE Operating, Inc. (Delaware)


COMFORCE Technical Services, Inc. (Delaware)


COMFORCE Technical, LLC (New York)


CTS Global, Inc. (New York)


CTS of Washington, LLC (New York)


COMFORCE Telecom, Inc. (Delaware)


SUMTEC Corporation (Delaware)


Uniforce Services, Inc. (New York)


PrO Unlimited, Inc. (New York)


PrO Unlimited Global (HK) Limited (Hong Kong)


PrO Unlimited Global Japan Ltd. (Japan)


PrO Unlimited Global Ltd (United Kingdom)


PrO Unlimited MPS, Inc. (New York)


Uniforce Staffing Services, Inc. (New York)


COMFORCE Information Technologies, Inc. (New York)


Temporary Help Industry Servicing Company, Inc. (New York)


Thisco of Canada, Inc. (New York)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                   5,287
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  47,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  70,042
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 165,698
<PP&E>                                               0                     846
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 166,544
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                 966,720
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                  59,147
<OTHER-SE>                                           0             (1,185,323)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 166,544
<SALES>                                         61,928                 198,374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,928                 198,374
<CGS>                                           33,798                  54,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,633                 479,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               436,422                 288,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,185                  68,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (582,708)               (692,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       400                   1,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (583,108)               (693,410)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
NIGC.GOV

Revenues Revenues

55%

51%

13%

5% 6%

11% 10%

13%

29%

8%

55%of

Amount in Millions

8%of

Submissions

reported

<$25M = 5%

of TotalGGR

Submissions

reported

>$250M=51%

of TotalGGR

GGR FY 2022

REVENUE BY RANGE

GGR FY 2022

Percent
EXHIBIT  31.2

Certification  of  Principal  Financial  Officer

I,  Michael  J.  Bongiovanni,  Chief  Financial  Officer,  certify  that:

1.   I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  HairMax
     International,  Inc.

2.   Based  on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a  material  fact  or  omit  to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the period covered by this
     quarterly  report;

3.   Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other financial
     information  included  in  this  quarterly  report,  fairly  present in all
     material  respects  the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows  of  the  registrant  as  of,  and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly  report;

4.   The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I  am  responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  ensure that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including  its
          consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during  the  period  in  which this quarterly
          report  is  being  prepared;

     b)   evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this  annual  report  ("Evaluation  Date");  and

     c)   disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most  recent  quarter  that  has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely  to  materially  affect, the registrant's internal control over
          financial  reporting;  and;

5.   The  registrant's  other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our  most  recent  evaluation,  to  the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee  of  registrant's  board  of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent  functions):

     a)   all  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting which are
          reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect  the registrant's ability to
          record,  process,  summarize  and report financial information (all of
          which  do  not  apply);  and

     b)   any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees  who  have  a  significant role in the registrant's internal
          control  over  financial  reporting,  (all  of  which  do  not apply).


Date:  November  11,  2004



/s/  Michael  J.  Bongiovanni
-----------------------------
Michael  J.  Bongiovanni
Chief  Financial  Officer
#### Guillermo Nova, Respondent, v Robert Fontanez, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 72]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J„), entered on or about March 29, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by defendant’s brief, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment *dismissing*the complaint based on plaintiff’s failure to demonstrate that he suffered serious injury under the “significant limitation of use” and “permanent consequential limitation of use” categories, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

Defendant made a prima facie showing that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident. Defendant submitted, among other things, the affirmed report of his orthopedist who opined that plaintiff had no deficits in range of motion in any of the body parts claimed to have been injured in the subject accident, and the affirmed report of a radiologist who opined that the MRI films of plaintiffs cervical spine, right knee and lumbar spine showed only chronic and degenerative conditions predating the accident *(see Mitrotti v Elia,*91 AD3d 449, 449-450 [1st Dept 2012]).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to causation. Flaintiff submitted an affirmed report from a physician who examined him once four years after the subject accident and acknowledged that plaintiff had preexisting arthritic *436conditions in each of the body parts claimed to have been injured. While the physician opined that his preexisting conditions were aggravated by the subject motor vehicle accident, he “failed to provide any basis for determining the extent of any exacerbation of plaintiff’s prior injuries” *(Brand v Evangelista,*103 AD3d 539, 540 [1st Dept 2013]; *see also Dorrian v Cantalicio,*101 AD3d 578 [1st Dept 2012]). Moreover, the physician failed to explain the inconsistencies between plaintiffs treating physician’s findings of improved range of motion within four months of the accident and his present findings of deficits *(see Santos v Perez,*107 AD3d 572 [1st Dept 2013]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Renwick, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Jean Occhiogrosso et al., Appellants, v New York State Office of Children and Family Services et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 7, 2011;

decided April 28, 2011

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*16 NY3d 703 (2011)].
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1






                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-59118, 33-59228, 33-81336, 333-46789 and 333-65745 of Fresh Choice, Inc. on
Form S-8 of our report dated February 12, 1999 appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Fresh Choice, Inc.
for the year ended December 27, 1998.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
March 26, 1999