alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BURNHAM v. LOUIS MEYERS & SON, Inc., et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Aug. 16, 1948.

Harry Meisnere, of New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Philip W. Lowry, of New York City, for defendants-appellees.

KAUFMAN, District Judge.

The trial of this case was concluded before Honorable Alfred D. Barksdale, District Judge, and a jury, on May 6, 1948. The Court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants and dismissed the complaint. Judgment was accordingly entered in favor of the defendants and plaintiff appealed.

On June 14, 1948, the plaintiff served a notice pursuant to Rule 75(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., designating limited portions of the record to be submitted on appeal. On June 6, defendants’ attorney, who practices alone, had left on an extended trip to the West and did not return until July 21. He was unable, therefore, to serve and file a designation of additional portions of the record to be included on the appeal within the ten-day period required by Rule 75(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Immediately upon his return, however, defendants’ attorney notified opposing counsel that plaintiff’s designation had just come to his attention; that it did not include the cross-examination and recross-examination of the plaintiff at the trial, and asked consent for such portions of the testimony, along with the exhibits referred to therein, to be included in the record on appeal. When plaintiff’s attorney refused, defendants served and filed counter-designations which included the above portions of the trial despite the lapse of the statutory ten-day period.

Defendants have now moved for an order relieving them of their default in failing to file the designation of additional matters to be included in the record on appeal within the prescribed period and for an order directing that the cross-examination and recross-examination of the plaintiff, together with the exhibits referred to in such testimony, be included therein. Plaintiff, by cross motion, urges that the counter-designations be stricken.

It is apparent from the papers and the argument on these motions that the record *322on appeal without the cross-examination and recross-examination of the plaintiff and the exhibits referred to in that portion of the testimony is inadequate and incomplete. Defendants should therefore be relieved of their default in failing to file the designation of additional matters within the ten-day period, and their counter-designation should be allowed. It is understood that the defendants will furnish the originals of the exhibits so designated on appeal.

Plaintiff’s cross motion is denied. Settle order on notice.
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the
amended Annual Report of LanOptics Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the
period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Dror Israel, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

| |  | BY: /S/ Dror Israel
Dror IsraelChief Financial Officer June 21, 2006
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company's offices and will be
made available for inspection upon request.



---

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS AMENDED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF AMETEK, INC. AT SEPTEMBER 30,
1995, AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF AMETEK, INC. FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           3,312
<SECURITIES>                                     7,406
<RECEIVABLES>                                  134,062
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,227
<INVENTORY>                                    102,419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               258,835
<PP&E>                                         394,396
<DEPRECIATION>                                 224,829
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 522,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          237,783
<BONDS>                                        150,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           353
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   522,230
<SALES>                                        635,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               635,560
<CGS>                                          490,234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  490,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,588
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,353
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,967
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,059
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,908
<DISCONTINUED>                                  11,199
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,676)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,431
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exclusive Use Air Attack (2024)**

**Checklist #21**

**For the National Preparedness Review, you will need to have the following items available for review:**

**GENERAL INFORMATION**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**SUPERVISION**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**QUALIFICATIONS AND TRAINING**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

Air Tactical Group Supervisor	9	April 2024

# image1.png
# Skill #6

&"Times New Roman,Bold"Fire Shelter Use		&"Times New Roman,Bold"Skill #6

&P	

&P	

# Code Page

# image1.png
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2893 

To amend the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act to prevent 

the use of Indian reservations located on the United States borders 

to facilitate cross-border drug trafficking, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Import and Export 

Act to prevent the use of Indian reservations located 

on the United States borders to facilitate cross-border 

drug trafficking, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cross Border Reserva5 tion Drug Trafficking Sentence Enhancement Act of 

6 2009’’. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2893 IS

1 SEC. 2. SENTENCING ENHANCEMENT FOR THE USE OF A 

2 BORDER INDIAN RESERVATIONS TO FACILI3 TATE CROSS-BORDER DRUG TRAFFICKING. 

4 Section 1010(b) of the Controlled Substances Import 

5 and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 960(b)) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(8)(A) Whoever during and in relation to a 

8 violation of subsection (a) enters, leaves, or is within 

9 a border Indian reservation, or attempts or conspires 

10 to do so, shall be fined under title 18, United States 

11 Code, or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or 

12 both. Any term of imprisonment imposed under this 

13 paragraph shall be served consecutively to any term 

14 imposed for the violation of subsection (a). 

15 ‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘border Indian 

16 reservation’ means a Federal or State Indian res17 ervation that borders or traverses any portion of a 

18 United States international border.’’. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
**SASES APPROVED SMOKEJUMPER AIRCRAFT**

12/1/2015

**AIRCRAFT****RESTRAINT METHOD**

Beech, BE-90, and subsequent series (King Air)					SA

Beech, BE-99A, and subsequent series (Airliner)					S

Beech, BE-200, and subsequent series (King Air)					SA

De Havilland, DHC-6 100/200/300 series Twin Otter					S

Casa, 212, 100/200/300 series							SA

Douglas, DC-3TP									S

Embraer, 110 Bandierante								SA

Dornier, DO-228									SA-FM

Short, C-23 A/SD-330									SA-FM

Cessna, C-208B, Grand Caravan							SA

**RESTRAINT METHOD CODE**

S	Simula Restraint System designed for and available

SA	Simula Restraint System can likely be adapted

FA	Factory seating provisions will accommodate smokejumpers

FM	Factory seating provisions may accommodate smokejumpers
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      34,009,629
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  395,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,745
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,798,325
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,125,146)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,977,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       36,135,601
<BONDS>                                         29,494
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,841,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,977,168
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,159,133
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,598,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (95,328,792)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,248,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             71,137,449
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         71,137,449
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                71,137,449
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   269.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   269.32
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
BOOKS-A-MILLION, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FOR 10-K FOR THE FIFTY-TWO WEEKS ENDED JANUARY 29,
2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,489
<INVENTORY>                                    194,624
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,909<F1>
<PP&E>                                         125,454
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,785<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,037
<BONDS>                                              0<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F4>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           181
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   286,785
<SALES>                                        404,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               404,057
<CGS>                                          296,316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  376,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,583
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,641
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,942
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,942
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.33<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33<F5>
<FN>
<F1>8,423-OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
<F2>1,644-OTHER ASSETS
<F3>35,936-LONG TERM DEBT
<F4>2,407-DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
<F5>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SFAS NO. 128 AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE
OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re:

DARIN DAVIS,

Debtor.

ASPHALT PROFESSIONALS, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DARIN DAVIS,

Appellee.

BAP Nos. CC-19-1275-FSTa

CC-19-1279-FSTa

(Related Appeals)

Bk. No. 1:10-bk-17214-VK

Adv. No. 1:10-ap-01354-VK

MEMORANDUM*

Argued and Submitted on May 20, 2020

Filed – June 22, 2020

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court

for the Central District of California

Honorable Victoria S. Kaufman, Bankruptcy Judge, Presiding

FILED

JUN 22 2020

SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK

U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL

OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication. Although it may be cited for

whatever persuasive value it may have, see Fed. R. App. P. 32.1, it has no precedential

value, see 9th Cir. BAP Rule 8024-1.
 

Appearances: Ray B. Bowen, Jr. argued on behalf of appellant; Alan

Wayne Forsley of Fredman Lieberman Pearl, LLP argued

on behalf of appellee.

 

Before: FARIS, SPRAKER, and TAYLOR, Bankruptcy Judges.

After we heard oral argument in these appeals, the Ninth Circuit

affirmed two of our prior decisions in appeals taken by Asphalt

Professionals, Inc. (“API”) in this case. Asphalt Professionals, Inc. v. Davis (In

re Davis), No. 19-60061, --- F. App’x ----, 2020 WL 3259449 (9th Cir. June 16,

2020); Asphalt Professionals, Inc. v. Davis (In re Davis), No. 19-60036, --- F.

App’x ----, 2020 WL 3259444 (9th Cir. June 16, 2020). In those decisions, the

Ninth Circuit has rejected every argument made by API in these appeals.

We could not deviate from the Ninth Circuit’s decisions even if we wanted

to (and we would not do so even if we could). Accordingly, we AFFIRM. 

2
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

Rimage Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-147344, 333-34788, 333-53875, 333-69550, 333-106901 and 333-127244) on Form S-8 of Rimage Corporation of our reports dated March 14, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Rimage Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated financial statement schedule, and our report dated March 14, 2008 with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Rimage Corporation.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, on January 1, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

March 14, 2008



---
EXHIBIT
32.1




STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Digital Media
Corporation (the "Company") for the nine months ended SEPTEMBER 30, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Daniel Ng, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company, certify that:





* the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





*
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates
and for the periods presented.






/s/
      Ng Chi Shing
              ---------------------
              Ng
      Chi Shing
              Director,
      President, Chief Executive Officer
              
              /s/
      Ng Chi Shing
              ---------------------
              Ng
      Chi Shing
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              
              November
      11, 2008








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2988 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the exceptions 

process for two years with respect to caps on payments for therapy 

services under the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2010 

Mr. ENSIGN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend 

the exceptions process for two years with respect to 

caps on payments for therapy services under the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing Effective and 

5 Necessary Individual Outpatient Rehabilitation Services 

6 (SENIORS) Act of 2010’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2988 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCEPTIONS PROCESS FOR MEDI2 CARE THERAPY CAPS. 

3 (a) EXTENSION.—Section 1833(g)(5) of the Social 

4 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(g)(5)) is amended by strik5 ing ‘‘December 31, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

6 2011’’. 

7 (b) REVISION TO THE MEDICARE IMPROVEMENT

8 FUND.—Section 1898(b)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 1395iii(b)(1)(A)), as amended by section 

10 1011(b) of the Department of Defense Appropriations 

11 Act, 2010 (Public Law 111–118), is amended by striking 

12 ‘‘$20,740,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$19,740,000,000’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### Interboro Insurance Company, Appellant, v Dahiana Perez et al., Defendants, and KHL Acupuncture, P.C., et al., Respondents.

[976 NYS2d 378]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered April 12, 2013, which denied plaintiffs motion for leave to enter a default judgment against all defendants and granted the cross motion of defendants-respondents KHL Acupuncture, EC. and South Shore Osteopathic Medicine, EC., to compel acceptance of their answers, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action for a declaration that no-fault insurance coverage does not exist, based solely on defendant Perez’s failure to appear for an examination under oath (EUO), the motion court providently exercised its discretion in granting defendants-respondents’ cross motion to compel plaintiff to accept their belated answers *(see*CPLR 3012 [d]). The affirmation from respondents’ attorney sufficiently explained that the minimal delay was due to a computer inputting error in her office *(Smoke v Windermere Owners, LLC,*109 AD3d 742 [1st Dept 2013]; *Goldman v Cotter,*10 AD3d 289, 291 [1st Dept 2004]). We note that respondents’ counsel acted promptly upon discovering the error, there is no history of willful neglect, and plaintiff suffered no prejudice.

Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, a meritorious defense is not required to obtain relief under CPLR 3012 (d) *(see Smoke,*109 AD3d at 742). In any event, respondents made such a showing by demonstrating that there is insufficient evidence that defendant Perez was properly notified of the EUOs. The affidavit of service submitted in support of plaintiffs motion for a default judgment was insufficient to satisfy its burden of establishing that the EUO scheduling letters were mailed in accordance with the no-fault implementing regulations *(see Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC,*82 AD3d 559, 560 [1st Dept 2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 705 [2011]). Plaintiff also failed to provide objective proof of mailing establishing that the letters were mailed to Perez *(see Matter of Szaro v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*13 AD3d 93, 94 [1st Dept 2004]). Accordingly, the motion court also properly denied plaintiffs motion for a default judgment *(see*CPLR 3215 [f]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Andrias, Saxe, Richter and Clark, JJ.
INTER
PARFUMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION



The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Inter
Parfums, Inc., that the Quarterly Report of Inter Parfums, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Inter Parfums, Inc.



|Date: August 8, 2012 | By: | /s/ Russell Greenberg       
|-------------------- | --- | ----------------------------
|                     |     | Russell Greenberg           
|                     |     | Executive Vice President,   
|                     |     | Chief Financial Officer and 
|                     |     | Principal Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Inter Parfums, Inc. and will be retained by Inter Parfums, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.