alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6057
WALLACE WILSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PARKER EVATT, Commissioner of the Department of Corrections; T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, Dist rict Judge. (CA-94-3238-18BD) Submitted: April 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996 Before WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wallace Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Evatt , No. CA-94-3238-18BD (D.S.C. Nov. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      50,000
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,000
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,448
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    55,356
<OTHER-SE>                                 (19,804)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,000
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.00
        




</TABLE>
Exhibit 23
                                                                      ----------

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Anaren, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-36761, No. 333- 03193, No. 333-70397, No. 333-70427, No. 333-50390, and No.
333-50392) on Form S-8 and Registration Statement (No. 333-70422) on Form S-3
of Anaren Inc. of our report dated August 5, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Anaren, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2003
and June 30, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2003, which report appears in
the June 30, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Anaren, Inc.

                                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP

Syracuse, New York
August 26, 2003
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-152803 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 16, 2010, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation, and the effectiveness of
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporations internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP              
|                                       
|Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania March 16, 2010
Exhibit 23


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52125)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Deferred
Compensation  and Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee  Directors,  in the
Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  2-95022)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc.  Amended Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees,  in the  Registration
Statement  (Form S-8 No. 33-7501)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Employee
Savings  Plan,  in the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  33-26101)
pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.   Long-Term   Incentive   Plan,  in  the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.  33-55922)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc. 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-49907) pertaining to the Ashland Inc. Leveraged Employee Stock Ownership
Plan, in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-62901)  pertaining to
the Ashland Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, in the Registration  Statement
(Form  S-8  No.  333-33617)  pertaining  to the  Ashland  Inc.  1997  Stock
Incentive Plan, in the  Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No.  33-57011) as
amended  by  Post-Effective   Amendment  No.  2,  pertaining  to  the  U.S.
$200,000,000  Ashland  Inc.  Medium-Term  Notes,  Series H, and the related
Prospectus,  of our report  dated  November  5, 1997,  with  respect to the
consolidated   financial  statements  and  schedule  of  Ashland  Inc.  and
subsidiaries  included in the Annual  Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
September 30, 1997.



                                                    Ernst & Young LLP


November 24, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3168 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3168

   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain non-
  Federal land in the State of Pennsylvania for inclusion in the Fort 
                    Necessity National Battlefield.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2010

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain non-
  Federal land in the State of Pennsylvania for inclusion in the Fort 
                    Necessity National Battlefield.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fort Necessity National Battlefield 
Land Acquisition Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Battlefield.--The term ``Battlefield'' means the Fort 
        Necessity National Battlefield in the State of Pennsylvania.
            (2) Non-federal land.--
                    (A) In general.--The term ``non-Federal land'' 
                means the approximately 157 acres of land in 
                Farmington, Pennsylvania, owned by Marie Rush.
                    (B) Inclusion.--The term ``non-Federal land'' 
                includes the historic Braddock Road trace surrounding 
                the land described in subparagraph (A).
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR FORT NECESSITY NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD, 
              PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may acquire, by donation or 
purchase, the non-Federal for inclusion in the Battlefield.
    (b) Boundary Revision.--On acquisition of the non-Federal land by 
the Secretary--
            (1) the non-Federal land shall be incorporated in, and 
        administered as part of, the Battlefield; and
            (2) the boundary of the Battlefield shall be revised to 
        reflect the acquisition of the non-Federal land.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
               EXTRACTED FROM THE ARMCO INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
               SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND 
               COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
               BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
<CIK>          0000007383
<NAME>         ARMCO INC.
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
<CURRENCY>     U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                            263,800
<SECURITIES>                        7,000
<RECEIVABLES>                     161,300
<ALLOWANCES>                        3,400
<INVENTORY>                       250,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  692,800
<PP&E>                          1,336,100
<DEPRECIATION>                    714,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,893,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             417,100
<BONDS>                           250,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                       185,900
<COMMON>                            1,100
<OTHER-SE>                         (8,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,893,800
<SALES>                         1,706,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,706,500
<CGS>                           1,503,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,503,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 28,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   115,400
<INCOME-TAX>                        5,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               109,600
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                         237,500
<NET-INCOME>                      347,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        3.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                        2.69
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.4(d)

                   [VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. LETTERHEAD]



February 26, 1998


Mr. Jack W. Schuler
C/O Crabtree Partners
1419 Lake Cook Road
Suite 410
Deerfield, IL 60015

Dear Jack:

     This letter is to confirm the extension for an additional two years of the 
arrangement (the "Arrangement") under which you have agreed to devote a 
significant portion of your professional working time to the business and 
affairs of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., ("Ventana" or the "Company").

     Under the extension of the Arrangement, you would receive a grant of a 
nonstatutory option to purchase 150,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company 
at an exercise price of $12.625 per share, the fair market value of the 
Company's Common Stock on the date that the extension of the Arrangement, as 
well as the grant of these additional options, was approved by the Company's 
Board of Directors. These options would vest on a cumulative monthly basis over 
24 months commencing February 26, 1998; provided that during such 24 month 
vesting period you devote, on a cumulative average basis, at least 50% of your 
professional working time to matters related to the Company.

     Please acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by signing the 
enclosed counterpart of this letter.

Very truly yours,


/s/ HANK PIETRASZEK
-------------------
Hank Pietraszek
President & CFO


          Acknowledged and agreed as of this 23rd day of April, 1998.

                            /s/  JACK W. SCHULER
                            -------------------------
                                 Jack W. Schuler
97-577.

#### State ex rel. Jackson v. Cain.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 108 (Monday, June 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; ARRA Supplement 
Applications.
    Date: July 22, 2009.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: D. G. PATEL, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 756, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-7682, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#27574653424b434067494e43434c09494e4f09404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a7a6b7e6f666e6d4a64636e6e6124646362246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research 
and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, HS)

    Dated: June 1, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-13288 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Oneil Myron WILKS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States,* Respondent.

No. 03-4837-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 19, 2006.

*94Jose L. DelCastillo, DelCastillo & Associates, LLC, Hartford, Conn., for Petitioner.

Dione M. Enea, Special Assistant United States Attorney (Scott Dunn, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), for Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N.Y., for Respondent.

PRESENT: Hon. AMALYA L. KEARSE, Hon. GUIDO CALABRESI, Hon. ROSEMARY S. POOLER, Circuit Judges.

*

 Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales has been substituted for his predecessor as the *94respondent in this matter. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

SUMMARY ORDER

Petitioner Oneil Myron Wilks (‘Wilks”), a native and citizen of Jamaica and a legal permanent resident of the United States, petitions this court pursuant to § 242(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (“the Act” or “INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), to review an April 7, 2003, order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). In that order, the BIA affirmed the January 9, 2001, decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) ordering Wilks removed from the United States on the basis of his conviction (entered by plea) for credit card theft in violation of Conn. GemStat. 53a-128c, a crime for which he was sentenced to one year imprisonment. Wilks argues that he is not subject to removal, because he is a derivative beneficiary of his father’s United States citizenship, or in the alternative, because he can be considered a national of the United States. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the procedural history, and the specific issues on appeal.

In view of the commendable position taken by the government at oral argument, this case will be held pending Wilks’s effort in state court to reduce, *nunc pro tunc,*his criminal sentence by one day or more. *See In re Cota-Vargas,*23 I. & N. Dec. 849, 851-53, 2005 WL 3105750 (BIA 2005) (holding that a state trial court’s decision to reduce an alien’s criminal sentence *nunc pro tunc*is entitled to full faith and credit by Immigration Judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals without regard to the trial court’s reasons for the reduction); *see also*8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G) (stating that the INA’s definition of “aggravated felony” includes “a theft offense ... for which the term of imprisonment [is] at least one year”); 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(II)(iii) (authorizing the removal of aliens who have committed an “aggravated felony”). The government has stipulated to a stay of removal pending the outcome of the state court proceedings.

The parties shall report to the court within 90 days. We GRANT Wilks’s motion for a stay of removal until further order of this court.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory Lee RUTHERFORD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-6693.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 15, 2006.

Decided: June 21, 2006.

Gregory Lee Rutherford, Appellant .Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Lee Rutherford seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his Rule 60(b) motion challenging the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The court found the motion was successive. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Rutherford has not made the requisite showing.

Additionally, we construe Rutherford’s notice of appeal and informal brief on appeal as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. *See United States v. Winestock,*340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.2003). To obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence sufficient to establish that no reasonable fact finder would have found the movant guilty. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(C), 2255 (2000). *337Rutherford’s claim does not satisfy either of these conditions.

For these reasons, we deny a certificate of appealability, decline to authorize Rutherford to file a successive § 2255 motion, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### State v. Joyner

Case below: 178 N.C. App. 742

No. 468P06

Def’s PDR Under 7A-31 (COA05-1124)

Denied 05/03/07
Exhibit
24.1
 
 **POWER
OF ATTORNEY**
 
 
 KNOW ALL
MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of Angelica Corporation
(hereinafter referred to as the “Company”)
hereby constitutes and appoints Stephen M. O’Hara, Steven L. Frey, Richard M.
Fiorillo and James W. Shaffer and each of them acting singly, the true and
lawful agents and attorneys, or agent and attorney, with full powers of
substitution, resubstitution and revocation, for and in the name, place and
stead of the undersigned to do any and all things and to execute any and all
instruments which said agents and attorneys, or any of them, may deem necessary
or advisable to enable the Company to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities
and Exchange Commission in respect thereof, in connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005,
including specifically, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
full power and authority to sign the name of the undersigned in the capacities
indicated below to the said Annual Report on Form 10-K to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, and to any and all amendments to said Annual
Report on Form 10-K, and the undersigned hereby grants to said attorneys and
agents, and to each of them singly, full power and authority to do and perform
on behalf of the undersigned every act and thing whatsoever necessary or
appropriate to be done in the premises as fully as the undersigned could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys and agents, or
any of them, or the substitutes or substitute of them or any of them, shall do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has subscribed these presents this 22nd day of
February, 2005.
 
 /s/
      Stephen M.
      O’Hara
    /s/
      James W.
      ShaffferStephen
      M. O’Hara
    James
      W. ShafferPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
    Vice
      President & Chief Financial OfficerDirector
    (Principal
      Financial Officer)(Principal
      Executive Officer)/s/
      Richard M.
      FiorilloRichard
      M. FiorilloChief
      Accounting Officer(Principal
      Accounting Officer)/s/
      Susan S.
      Elliott
    /s/
      Don W.
      HubbleSusan
      S. Elliott
    Don
      W. Hubble(Director)
    (Director)/s/
      Ronald J.
      Kruszewski
    /s/
      Charles W.
      MuellerRonald
      J. Kruszewski
    Charles
      W. Mueller(Director)
    (Director)/s/
      William A.
      Peck
    /s/
      Kelvin R.
      WestbrookWilliam
      A. Peck
    Kelvin
      R. Westbrook(Director)
    (Director)