alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet found on page 3 and consolidated statement
of operations found on page 5 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the
year to date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      141,402
<SECURITIES>                             10,828,125
<RECEIVABLES>                               621,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                 11,452
<INVENTORY>                                 156,057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,002,679
<PP&E>                                    7,366,719
<DEPRECIATION>                            3,239,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           16,296,274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     3,757,259
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        305
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               10,733,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             16,296,274
<SALES>                                   1,966,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          1,966,356
<CGS>                                     1,160,559
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             1,160,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          1,283,463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (319,442)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (769,645)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (621,563)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (148,082)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (148,082)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.05)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2   RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTS   I, David E. Pertl, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Fresh Choice, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that  (1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 29, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.  March 21, 2003
  /S/ David E. PertlDavid E. PertlSenior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-50919

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

ARTURO ROGEILO DOMINGUEZ, JR.,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

No. 7:18-CR-127-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Arturo Dominguez, Jr., has moved 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 10, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-50919 Document: 00515111295 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2019
No. 18-50919

2

to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), 

and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dominguez has filed 

a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair 

evaluation of Dominguez’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, which we 

therefore decline to consider without prejudice to collateral review. See United 

States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief, relevant portions of the record, and 

Dominguez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-50919 Document: 00515111295 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/10/2019
# EXHIBIT 99.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cenex Harvest States
Cooperatives (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended
November 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 9, 2003 (the Report), I, John D. Johnson, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of  1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ John D. Johnson
John D. Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer
January 9, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  INFINITY, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Infinity, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2003:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Infinity, Inc.





/s/ Stanton E. Ross
Stanton E. Ross
Chief Executive Officer
August 19, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Infinity, Inc. and will be
retained by Infinity, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.
BULLETIN 

No. 2001-1 February 27,2001 

Subject: 2001 FEE RATE; PRELIMINARY 

The National Indian Gaming Commission (Commission) has adopted preliminary annual 

fee rate of 0.00% for tier I and 0.08% (-0008) for tier 2 for calendar year 2001. 'This rate 

applies to all assessable gross revenues from each gaming operation under the jurisdiction 

of the Commission. 

If a tribe has a certificate of self-regulation under 25 CFR part 5 18, the preliminary fee 

rate on class I1 revenues for calendar year 2001 shall be one-half of the annual fee rate, 

which is 0.04% (.0004). 

The fees are due in four quarterly payments. Enclosed is a copy of the Federal Register 

Notice announcing the adoption of these rates. 

Please be sure to use calendar year 2000 as the base period for determining 2001 fee 

payments. Also, please provide the following identifying information: name, address and 

telephone number of the gaming operation; name of licensing tribe; name and telephone 

number of contact person. 

Should you have any questions, please call Bobby Gordon at 2021632-7003- 

NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1441 L St. NW, Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 WWw.NICC.GOV 

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ: St. Paul, MN; Tulsa. OK
***NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION***

***MICS AUDIT CHECKLIST***

***TIER A-SURVEILLANCE (ASV)***

Page 9 of 9
From: Karen Marron

To: Doulou, Vannice C.

Subject: Billings, MT Consultations

Date: Monday, April 24, 2017 12:48:36 PM

As a participant in the NIGC trainings, I attended the tribal consultations in Billings. I have never been

present for these before, and I was unclear if comments were welcome from the general public or if

only tribal leaders were to speak.

I would like to offer my thumbs up on the idea of suspending 542 regulations. I believe the biggest

drawback to the guidance offered by

these MICS is the lack of nimbleness in updating them. New technology is hard to keep up with

under the best of circumstances. If this suspension

would make the NIGC quicker to adapt standards and guidance, I see it as a positive change.

A speaker for the Ho Chunk Nation expressed his concern that the MICS would be dropped which

would cause possible problems for some

tribes’ compact negotiations, which I can understand. But it sounds as though a suspension would

bridge that gap. I would not want to see

the MICS become obsolete or neglected.

Karen DeRoode Marron

Internal Auditor

Upper Sioux Gaming Commission
# SEAT Pilot Duty-Day 2018
96-1645.

#### State ex rel. Walker v. Lancaster City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

Fairfield App. No. 95CA0024. On request for oral argument. Request denied.
Exhibit 23
                         Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Anaren Microwave, Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements (No.
33-19618,  No. 33-1768,  No.  33-36761 and No.  333-03193) on Form S-8 of Anaren
Microwave,   Inc.  of  our  report  dated  August  14,  1997,  relating  to  the
consolidated  balance sheets of Anaren  Microwave,  Inc. and  subsidiaries as of
June 30, 1997 and June 30,  1996,  and the related  consolidated  statements  of
operations,  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended June 30, 1997, which report appears in the June 30, 1997
annual report on Form 10-K of Anaren Microwave, Inc.

                                                      KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Syracuse, New York
September 18, 1997
EXHIBIT 12

                 ACX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                        For the Year Ended
                          Dec. 27,  Dec. 31,  Dec. 31,  Dec. 31,  Dec. 31,
                            1992      1993      1994      1995      1996
Income (loss) from                                                       
  continuing operations  $(10,012)  $20,789   $32,783  $51,247   $22,409
                                                                         
Amortization of
  capitalized interest        344       427       443      465       573
                                                                         
Fixed charges related to                                                 
  pre-tax income (loss)                                                    
  from continuing                                                          
  operations                5,859     3,894     6,918   10,023     9,120
                                                                         
ADJUSTED EARNINGS (LOSS) $ (3,809)  $25,110   $40,144  $61,735   $32,102
                                                                         
Fixed charges:                                                           
Interest expense         $  5,379   $ 3,412   $ 6,370  $ 9,306   $ 8,177
                                                                         
Interest factor of rent                                                  
  expense                     480       482       548      717       943
                                                                         
Fixed charges related to                                                 
  pre-tax income (loss)                                                    
  from continuing                                                          
  operations                5,859     3,894     6,918   10,023     9,120
                                                                         
Fixed charges related to                                                 
  discontinued operations  13,455       952       790      881     1,060
                                                                         
Interest capitalized for                                                 
  continued operations        828       163       223      885       744
                                                                         
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES     $  20,142   $ 5,009   $ 7,931  $11,789   $10,924
                                                                         
Ratio of earnings to                                                     
  fixed charges                NA      5.01      5.06     5.24      2.94


NA    Fixed charges exceeded 1992 adjusted earnings by $23.9 million.
Included in these results were $13.7 million of restructuring charges
associated with the spin-off from Adolph Coors Company.  Without giving
effect to such charges, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the
year ended December 27, 1992 would have been 0.49.
For Immediate Release Contact: Shawn Pensoneau 

 (202) 632-7003 

NIGC Announces Tribal Consultation 

Washington, DC, December 16, 2010 — The National Indian Gaming Commission 

(Commission) has announced a government-to-government consultation to be held 

January 14, 2011, at the Little Creek Resort in Shelton, Washington. 

“The Commission places a high priority on consultation. We are eager to engage in a 

meaningful dialogue with tribes as we begin to consider the relevance of the 

Commission’s current regulations for today’s industry and what can be done to improve 

them in order to better protect the industry,” said Chairwoman Stevens. “As the primary 

regulators for the Indian gaming industry, tribes and tribal regulators are uniquely 

positioned to provide the NIGC with relevant information and feedback. We look forward 

to the discussion.” 

A Notice of Inquiry was published in the Federal Register November 18, 2010, notifying 

the public that the Commission is conducting a comprehensive review of all regulations 

promulgated to implement the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA). The NOI 

encourages input regarding which regulations need revision and what process should be 

utilized to revise them. 

This process is consistent with Executive Order 13,175, “Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments,” and reflects the Commission’s commitment to hold 

discussions prior to initiating the rulemaking process and before drafting proposed rules. 

All information on the regulatory review, including the Federal Register notice can be 

found by visiting our website at www.nigc.gov. 

If you have questions or need additional information prior to the meetings, please 

contact Rita Homa, at (202) 632-7003. 

The NIGC is an independent regulatory agency established within the Department of the Interior pursuant 

to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. 

###
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Everett M. Durant, Appellant.

[977 NYS2d 535]

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Alex R. Renzi, J.), rendered June 10, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of robbery in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1]). Viewing the evidence in light of the contested element of larcenous intent as charged to the jury *(see generally People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]), we reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). “Where, as here, witness credibility is of paramount importance to the determination of guilt or innocence, the appellate court must give [g]reat deference ... [to the] fact-finder’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony and observe demeanor” *(People v McMillon,*77 AD3d 1375, 1376 [2010], *lv denied*16 NY3d 897 [2011] [internal quotation *1367marks omitted]). While a finding that defendant did not have the requisite intent would not have been unreasonable, “it cannot be said that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” *(id.).*The victim testified that defendant stole his wallet during a group assault on him, and the People presented evidence establishing that defendant “knowingly participated and continued to participate even after his companion[s’] intentions [to take the victim’s cell phone] became clear” and thus “shared a ‘community of purpose’ with his companion[s]” *(People v Allah,*71 NY2d 830, 832 [1988]). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, County Court properly denied his request for an adverse inference charge concerning the failure of the police to record his interrogation electronically *(see McMillon,*77 AD3d at 1375; *People v Hammons,*68 AD3d 1800, 1801 [2009], *lv denied*14 NY3d 801 [2010]). Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Lindley Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
II 

Calendar No. 382 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3012 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2–116th Street in North Troy, New York, as the Martin G. ‘‘Marty’’ 

Mahar Post Office. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2010 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2–116th Street in North Troy, New York, 

as the Martin G. ‘‘Marty’’ Mahar Post Office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MARTIN G. ‘‘MARTY’’ MAHAR POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 2–116th Street in North Troy, 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3012 RS

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Martin 

2 G. ‘Marty’ Mahar Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Martin G. ‘Marty’ 

7 Mahar Post Office’’. 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS

PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 382 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3012 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMahar Post Office. Troy, New York, as the Martin G. ‘‘Marty’’ al Service located at 2–116th Street in North 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


PWALKER on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
#### The John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. *v.*Manning.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

April 27, 1881.)

1. New TttrAL—Mandate eeom Suiuíeme Coima’.

The circuit court cannot out ertain a motion for a now trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence, after a mandate has been received from the supreme court entitling tlie plaintiff to an absolute and final judgment.—[Hd.

Wallace, D. J.

If the defendant’s motion for a new trial, on account of newly-discovercd evidence, were to be decided according to the rules which govern the exercise of judicial *300discretion on such motions, the case made would not seem to be a sufficient one. But this court has no authority to grant the motion, however meritorious the case might be, because it must execute the. mandate of the supreme court sent here upon the affirmance of the judgment of this court by the supreme court. That mandate entitles the plaintiff to an absolute and final judgment. If a mandate of the supreme court is open to construction, the court below can resort to the opinion of the supreme court, and can apply proper rules of construction, but further than this the court below cannot go

In *Skilleru’s Ex’rs*v. *May’s Ex’rs,*6 Cranch, 267, where it appeared to the circuit court, in a case remanded by the supreme court for further proceedings, that the cause was one not within the jurisdiction of the court, it was held the circuit court was bound to carry the mandate into execution. In *Ex parte Story,*12 Pet. 339, it was held that the court below properly-refused to allow the defendant to file a supplemental plea and answer, because the cause was before it upon a mandate of the supreme court, and the court below was bound to execute the mandate. See, also, *Ex parte Sibbald,*12 Pet. 488, where it is said “the inferior court is bound by the decree as the law of the ease, and must carry it into execution according to the mandate. They cannot vary it or examine it for any other purpose than execution, or give any other or further relief.” In *Ex parte Dubuque*v. *Pacific Railroad,*1 Wall. 69, where the court below, after entering judgment according to the mandate, and thereafter affidavits of ability to show new facts having been filed, granted a motion for a new trial, the supreme court issued a *mandamus*commanding the lower court to vacate and erase the order, upon the ground that the authority of the court below extended only to executing the mandate.

The motion is, therefore, denied.
#### In the Matter of Kevin Clark, Petitioner, v Martin Rettinger et al., Respondents.

[977 NYS2d 664]

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, and a cross motion having been made on behalf of respondent Hon. Martin Rettinger to dismiss the petition, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied, the cross motion granted and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Acosta, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Fortis Benefits Insurance Company (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert B. Pollock, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 16, 2005 /s/ Robert B. PollockRobert B. PollockPresident and Chief Executive Officer