alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-24-00098-CR

IN RE NOEMI CONSTANCIO

Original Proceeding

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-13-C2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus/Emergency Hearing Requested, filed on 

April 2, 2024, is denied.1

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, 

Justice Smith, and 

Justice Wright2

Petition denied

1 See Polvon v. State, 682 S.W.3d 651 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2024, pet. filed).

2 The Honorable Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired) of the Eleventh Court of Appeals, sitting by 

assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.
In re Constancio Page 2

Opinion delivered and filed May 2, 2024

Do not publish 

[OT06]
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 205 (Monday, October 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 54992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25618]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER06-615-011; ER06-615-012; ER07-1257-000]


California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice 
Deferring Technical Conference

October 19, 2009.
    On September 15, 2009, the Commission issued a notice in the above-
captioned proceeding,\1\ seeking comments from parties on the need for 
Commission staff to convene a technical conference as directed in Cal 
Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 122 FERC ] 61,271 (2008). Comments were 
submitted by the Indicated Parties,\2\ Western Power Trading Forum, 
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the California Independent System 
Operator Corporation, and Southern California Edison Company. Upon 
consideration, the Commission will defer holding a technical conference 
pending further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Notice Seeking Comment on Need for Technical Conference, 
Docket Nos. ER06-615-011, et al. (Sept. 15, 2009).
    \2\ Indicated Parties include the California Municipal Utilities 
Association, Silicon Valley Power, M-S-R Public Power Agency, 
Transmission Agency of Northern California, Modesto Irrigation 
District, Bay Area Municipal Transmission Group, Northern California 
Power Agency, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Metropolitan 
Water District of Southern California, the Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, 
Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, California, and the City 
and County of San Francisco, California.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-25618 Filed 10-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,953,765
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,028,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    89,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,334,409
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,746,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,333,763
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    70
<COMMON>                                       1,034
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,221,314
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,746,743
<SALES>                                        8,298,789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,298,789
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,484,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             696,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,262,440
<INCOME-TAX>                                   275,641
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            986,799
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   986,799
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .08



</TABLE>
II 

Calendar No. 383 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3013 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

216 Westwood Avenue in Westwood, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Sergeant 

Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2010 

Mr. REID (for Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. MENENDEZ)) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 216 Westwood Avenue in Westwood, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3013 RS

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER R. HRBEK POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 216 Westwood Avenue in 

5 Westwood, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher R. Hrbek Post Office Build7 ing’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher 

12 R. Hrbek Post Office Building’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 383 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3013 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Posttopher R. Hrbek Post Office Building’’. Westwood, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Sergeant Chris- al Service located at 216 Westwood Avenue in 

MAY 18, 2010 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

BRAD J. KOPLINSKI,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2899 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 100 DB 2022

(Dauphin County Court of Common 

Pleas, Criminal Division No. CP-22-CR0004745-2020)

Attorney Registration No. 201951

(Cumberland County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2022, the Joint Petition for Temporary 

Suspension is GRANTED, Brad J. Koplinski is placed on temporary suspension, see

Pa.R.D.E. 214(d)(5), and he shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this Order and to 

request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this Order are specifically 

preserved. See Pa.R.D.E. 214(f)(2).

Justice Dougherty did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7574

EMORY G. SNELL, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LESTER RICH, Special Agent of the Bureau ofAlcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Charleston Division, and others as yet unknown, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-3422-5-11JI) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emory G. Snell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parkwood Griffith,Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The district court properly construed Snell’s complaint as one filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 2 PER CURIAM:Emory G. Snell, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. * We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinionaccepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Snell v. Rich , No. CA-96-3422-5-11JI (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 1998). We deny Snell’s four motions for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6665

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DENITRA CARMITA LEWIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District

Judge. (5:06-cr-00057-gee-jgw-4)

Submitted: June 30, 2008 Decided: July 8, 2008

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Denitra Carmita Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Albert Lustig,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).

-2-

PER CURIAM:

Denitra Carmita Lewis seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying her motion for reduction of sentence pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). In a criminal case, a notice of

appeal must be filed within ten days after the order appealed from

is entered. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). However, with or

without a motion, the district court may extend the time to file a

notice of appeal for an additional thirty days upon a finding of

excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United

States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

While the district court dismissed Lewis’ motion for

sentence reduction on March 12, 2008, the district court identified

March 22, 2008, as the “effective date” of the order. On April 21,

2008, Lewis filed a notice of appeal.* While the notice of appeal

was filed after the ten-day appeal period expired, it was filed

within the thirty-day excusable neglect period. Therefore, we

remand the case to the district court for a determination as to

whether Lewis has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting

an extension of the appeal period. The record, as supplemented,

will then be returned to this court for further consideration. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
-3-

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

REMANDED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

t0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142786 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142786 

 COA: 293134 

Oscoda CC: 08-001021-FC 

RICHARD ANDREW CUNNINGHAM, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>
                            THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY
                            FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
                            FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                            CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S 1998
                            FORM 10K AND IS  
		            QUALIFIED BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                            FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                          260,934
<SECURITIES>                     11,906
<RECEIVABLES>                 1,060,425
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                     957,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              2,618,370
<PP&E>                        4,785,499
<DEPRECIATION>                2,896,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                4,785,759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,472,315
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                         81,912
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                    2,582,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  4,785,759
<SALES>                       5,481,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              5,481,555
<CGS>                         3,903,414
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 3,903,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               63,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   3,431
<INCOME-TAX>                      1,116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               2,315
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                      2,315
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .01
        

</TABLE>
# White Cane Safety Day, 2009

All Americans deserve the freedom to participate in every aspect of our society and pursue their full measure of happiness. For blind Americans, the white cane is a potent symbol of that freedom—affording them greater independence and mobility. Today we renew our commitment to provide full inclusion and equal opportunities for those among us who are blind or have low vision. As Americans, we must nurture a society that values the unique abilities and individual contributions of all its people.

Individuals who are blind or have low vision are less constrained and better integrated in our country than ever before, but much work remains to ensure they have the opportunity to reach their full potential. My Administration is committed to securing full and equal access to education and employment for blind Americans and all those with disabilities. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act substantially increased funding for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, as well as vocational rehabilitation services, including job training, education, and placement.

For Americans who are blind or have low vision, a white cane is just one of a wide range of tools that sustain independence and productivity. In recent years, refreshable Braille displays and speech synthesis devices have given these individuals access to the Internet, unlocking a new frontier of limitless possibility. As we encourage the development of new assistive technologies, we must also improve access to existing tools. The Braille code has opened a doorway to literacy for countless individuals, but far too many blind children in our country are not learning to read it. By improving Braille literacy, we will secure a brighter future for these young Americans.

In the 45 years since White Cane Safety Day was first proclaimed by President Lyndon Johnson, Americans who are blind or have low vision have achieved substantial progress. As leaders in government and business, academics, and the arts, they have made remarkable contributions to our Nation, proving that sight is no requisite for success. We will continue to strive for a more just and equitable Nation that celebrates diversity in all its forms and promotes the full inclusion of all individuals in our communities.

By joint resolution approved on October 6, 1964 (Public Law 88-628, as amended), the Congress designated October 15 of each year as White Cane Safety Day to recognize the contributions of Americans who are blind or have low vision.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim October 15, 2009, as White Cane Safety Day. I call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifteenth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.

[FR Doc. E9-25409

Billing code 3195-W9-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2547 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on triphenyltin hydroxide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. BURRIS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on triphenyltin 

hydroxide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIPHENYLTIN HYDROXIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.96 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 triphenyltin hydroxide) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2547 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Robert Bryan Finch, Appellant

No. 06-19-00042-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of 

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 27636). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief

Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Robert Bryan Finch, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 22, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall Jones, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
      best
      of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Randall Jones


Randall
      Jones


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      22, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

     <ARTICLE>      5
     <MULTIPLIER>   1
            
     <S>                                    <C>
     <PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JUN-30-1997
     <PERIOD-START>                         JUL-01-1996
     <PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1996
     <CASH>                                        9309
     <SECURITIES>                                     0
     <RECEIVABLES>                                    0
     <ALLOWANCES>                                     0
     <INVENTORY>                                      0
     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                             10465
     <PP&E>                                       16561
     <DEPRECIATION>                                8275
     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                              212569
     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        95550
     <BONDS>                                          0
     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
     <PREFERRED>                                      0
     <COMMON>                                     23664
     <OTHER-SE>                                  (72441)
     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                212569
     <SALES>                                          0
     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
     <CGS>                                            0
     <TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                            371693
     <LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
     <INCOME-PRETAX>                            (371693)
     <INCOME-TAX>                                     0
     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (371693)
     <DISCONTINUED>                                   0
     <EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
     <CHANGES>                                        0
     <NET-INCOME>                               (371693)
     <EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.02)
     <EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
             
     
</TABLE>