alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 108 (Monday, June 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel--Program Project.
    Date: July 10, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH, Democracy II, 6701 Democracy Plaza II, 200, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: John K. Hayes, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 959, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-
3398, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d656c74687e674d606c646123636465236a627b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c141d05190f163c111d151052121514521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 1, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-13282 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- The Boeing Company Under Contract No. NOOOI9-07-C-0035 et al. APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ) ) ) ASBCA No. 59580 ) ) Andrew E. Shipley, Esq. Seth H. Locke, Esq.

Perkins Coie Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Arthur M. Taylor, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Chantilly, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 14 April 2016

MARK N. STEMPLER Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59580, Appeal ofThe Boeing Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
EXHIBIT 32.1-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  eTotalSource,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date  May 12, 2005                     By: /s/ Virgil Baker
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Virgil Baker
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to  _______________________
and will be retained by ________________________ and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                 ADVANCED ENERGY RECOVERY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES




            Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           and Chief Executive Officer

     I, Charles A. Holtgraves, Chief Executive officer (Principal Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer), certify that this quarterly report on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ended (June 30, 2005) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that the information contained herein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced Energy
Recovery, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the periods presented.


Date: 09/14/2005                            /s/  Charles A. Holtgraves
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Charles A. Holtgraves
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7810

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SALVATORE COTTONE, a/k/a Sal, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CR-89-102) Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: June 14, 2004 Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Salvatore Cottone, Appellant Pro Se. Justin W. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Salvatore Cottone seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion that the court construed as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cottone has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Fire Aviation & Media 

Ref. Public Law 103-11 eff. April 23, 1995.

Media requests to ride as passengers on fire fighting aircraft:

No non-essential personnel are permitted.  Includes air-attack, recon flights, lead planes, air tankers, helicopters etc.

Under certain circumstances, media may be transported, or pooled on a non-mission flight, but they must have the appropriate authorization of the 

Line Office having jurisdiction over the event of interest

The National or Regional Dir. Of FAM or IC (FSM 5716.4, 2.5(4))

The installation of special photographic or sound equipment (internally or externally to aircraft)  no matter what size, is yet another risk area.  These installations can cause accidents or injury and cannot be done haphazardly. Installations (aircraft modifications) must be coordinated with the Reg.Aviation Officer, and Reg. Maintenance Spec. as meet FAA requirements (PL 103-411)
JAMMIE D. GORDON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0905

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 6, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Jack M. Schemer, Judge.

Jammie D. Gordon, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
z 30-/5:ILE COPY

ELECTRONIC RECORD

C0A# 11-12-00328-CR OFFENSE: 22.011

Robert Thornburgh, Jr. v.

STYLE: The State of Texas COUNTY: Brown

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 35th District Court

DATE: 2/5A5 Publish: NO TCCASE#: CR21718

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Robert Thornburgh, Jr. v.

style: The State of Texas

A?PEllANT*S> Petition

cca#: PD-0230-15

CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

-RZfuterb JUDGE:

DATE: 0Hl9-**l34>ir

JUDGE: fJk UiSU/2^L~

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
April 7, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TYRONE BERRY , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00844

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the j udgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Number of Gaming Number of Gaming Number of Gaming Revenue

Operations Revenues Operations Revenues Operations Revenues Percentage

Portland 51 $2,902,799 49 $2,873,925 2 $28,874 1.0%

Sacramento 66 $6,992,690 64 $6,956,562 2 $36,128 0.5%

Phoenix 48 $2,738,803 48 $2,716,525 0 $22,278 0.8%

St. Paul 128 $4,745,087 120 $4,797,631 8 ($52,544) (1.1%)

Tulsa 68 $2,033,815 64 $2,014,997 4 $18,818 0.9%

OK City 60 $1,866,562 53 $1,800,972 7 $65,590 3.6%

Washington DC 28 $6,751,839 27 $6,739,392 1 $12,447 0.2%

Totals 449 $28,031,595 425 $27,900,004 24 $131,591 0.5%

Portland Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.

Sacramento California, and Northern Nevada

Phoenix Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Southern Nevada.

St. Paul Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska, South Dakota, Wisconsin and Wyoming

Tulsa Kansas, and Eastern Oklahoma.

OK City Western Oklahoma and Texas.

Washington DC Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and New York.

Source: Compiled from gaming operation audited financial statements received by the NIGC through June 27, 2014.

National Indian Gaming Commission

Tribal Gaming Revenues (in thousands) by Region

Fiscal Year 2013 and 2012

Fiscal Year 2013 Fiscal Year 2012 Increase (decrease)
#### FURMANEK v. SOUTHERN TRADING CO. THE SOUTHERN STATES.

No. 399.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Dec. 3, 1953.

*406Stark & Goldstein, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Krusen, Evans & Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

WELSH, District Judge.

Respondents except to all of the interrogatories propounded by libellant on the ground that in a preamble or introductory statement respondents are advised the interrogatories are to be deemed continuing so as to require supplemental answers if respondents obtain further information between the time answers are served and the time of trial. In other words, respondents contend that under Admiralty Rule 31, 28 U.S.C.A., a party is obliged to file and serve only one set of answers to interrogatories even though he subsequently acquires additional information with regard to the subject matter of the interrogatories.

In Wolf v. Dickinson, D.C., 16 F.R.D. -, the identical contention was raised and resolved against the objecting party. See also Smith v. Acadia Overseas Freighters, Limited, D.C., 120 F.Supp. 192, where it was held the interrogatories are to be deemed continuing even though there is no preamble to the interrogatories specifying that the interrogatories are to be deemed continuing.

The exception is accordingly dismissed.

Respondents take specific exception to libellant’s interrogatory No. 25 on the ground that it does not seek factual information regarding the accident alleged in the libel but instead seeks to develop the theory of respondents’ defenses to the libel. Said interrogatory provides: “Did claimant’s assumption of risk, or his carelessness, fault or neglect, or his vice or misconduct, aggravate, cause or contribute to, his illness, injury or condition? If you answer ‘yes’, state all-facts in connection therewith.”

Respondents’ answer to the libel alleges the accident was caused by the negligence and carelessness of the libellant and alleges the affirmative defenses of contributory negligence and assumption of risk. We believe that the libellant is entitled to know upon what facts those allegations and defenses are based, and it is our thought that the interrogatory in question was propounded for the purpose of discovering those facts. However, since the interrogatory in question as drawn is perhaps technically objectionable leave will be granted the libellant to re-draft the interrogatory so as to conform with the views heretofore expressed.

Accordingly, respondents’ exception to interrogatory No. 25 is sustained.
Exhibit 10.2


 


JOINDER AGREEMENT


 


This Joinder Agreement (the “Joinder
Agreement”) is made and entered into as of August 2, 2022 by the undersigned with respect to that certain Letter
Agreement, dated January 25, 2021 (the “Letter Agreement”), delivered by DHP SPAC-II Sponsor LLC and the
executive officers and directors of DiamondHead Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) to the Company. Capitalized terms
used herein without definition are used as defined in the Letter Agreement.


 


By executing this Joinder Agreement, the undersigned
hereby agrees, as of the date first set forth above, that the undersigned shall become a party to the Letter Agreement and shall be bound
by, and entitled to the rights provided under, the terms and provisions of the Letter Agreement as an Insider (as applicable and as defined
therein).


 


This Joinder Agreement shall be governed by and
construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to conflicts of law principles that
would result in the application of the substantive laws of another jurisdiction. The undersigned hereby (i) agrees that any action,
proceeding, claim or dispute arising out of, or relating in any way to, this Agreement shall be brought and enforced in the courts of
New York City, in the State of New York, and irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction and venue, which jurisdiction and venue shall be
exclusive, and (ii) waives any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and venue or that such courts represent an inconvenient forum.


 


[Signature page follows]


 






    


    


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed
this Joinder Agreement as of the date written above.


 


		By:	/s/ Michael Bayles
	 	 	Name: Michael Bayles



 


 


Acknowledged and Agreed:


 


Diamondhead holdings corp.


 


	By:	/s/ David T. Hamamoto	 
	 	Name: David T. Hamamoto	 
	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer	 



 


[Signature
Page to Joinder to Letter Agreement]
MOBILE FOOD SERVICE REQUEST FORM 

Incident Name: Financial Code: 

Incident/Project #: Food Service Request E #: 

Shower Unit Request E #: 

I. FOOD SERVICE: Requested Date, Time, Meal Types, and Number of Meals (Dinner will 

always be the first meal served) 

Date of first meal: Time of first meal: 

1st meal: Dinner 

2nd meal: Hot Breakfast 

3rd meal: Shift Provisions/Sack Lunches 

This Block For National Interagency Coordination Center Use Only 

Actual agreed upon Date/Time first meals are to be served: Date: _________ Time: _________ 

1st meal: ____________ Dinner 

2nd meal: ____________ Hot Breakfast 

3rd meal: ____________ Shift Provisions/Sack Lunches 

II. SHOWER SERVICE: Requested Date and Time Mobile Shower Unit is Needed 

Date Needed: Time Needed: 

Mobile Shower Unit Type Ordered: Large (12+ stalls) Small (4-11 stalls) 

This Block For National Interagency Coordination Center Use Only 

Actual Agreed Upon Date/Time Mobile Shower Unit to be Operational: Date: ____________ Time: ____________ 

III. Additional Information 

Spike Camp: Yes No Unknown 

Estimated Duration of Incident: Estimated Personnel at Peak: 

IV. Location 

Dispatch Contact: Telephone Number: 

Reporting Location (Must Match RO): 

Contact Person at the Incident (Must Match RO): 

National Interagency Coordination Center – (208) 387-5400
Exhibit 13.1

Section 906 Certification

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20‐F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a‐14(b) or Rule 15d‐14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

José Antonio Álvarez, the Chief Executive Officer, José G. Cantera, the Chief Financial Officer and José Doncel, the Chief Accounting Officer of Banco Santander, S.A., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

|  | 1. |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|--|----|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Banco Santander, S.A. |
|--|----|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |                               |                           |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Date: March 31, 2017 |                               |
|                      |                               |
|                      |                               |
|                      | /s/ José Antonio Álvarez |
|                      | Name:                              | José Antonio Álvarez |
|                      | Title:                             | Chief Executive Officer        |
|                      |                               |                           |
|                      |                               |                           |
|                      |                               |                           |
|                      | /s/ José G. Cantera           |
|                      | Name:                              | José G. Cantera           |
|                      | Title:                             | Chief Financial Office         |
|                      |                               |                           |
|                      |                               |                           |
|                      |                               |                           |
|                      | /s/ José Doncel               |
|                      | Name:                              | José Doncel               |
|                      | Title:                             | Chief Accounting Officer       |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of eTotalSource, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Virgil Baker,  Chief
Financial Officer of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sction 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Virgil Baker
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Virgil Baker, CFO

Dated:  8/16/04
-  Home 
        -  Health Information 
        -  Urologic Diseases 
        -  Kidney Infection 
        -  Symptoms & Causes 

        - English
        - Español

Kidney Infection
-  Definition & Facts 
-  Symptoms & Causes 
-  Diagnosis 
-  Treatment 
-  Eating, Diet, & Nutrition 
-  Clinical Trials 

# Symptoms & Causes of Kidney Infection (Pyelonephritis)

## What are the symptoms of kidney infections?

Symptoms of kidney infections vary by age. Symptoms may include
          - chills
          - fever
          - pain in your back, side, or groin
          - nausea
          - vomiting
          - cloudy, dark, bloody, or foul-smelling urine
          - frequent, painful urination

A child younger than 2 years old with a kidney infection may only have a high fever.

An adult older than age 65 with a kidney infection may have none of the typical symptoms. An older person may only have problems with thinking, such as
          - confusion
          - hallucinations
          - jumbled speech

## Seek care right away

Seek care right away if you have kidney infection symptoms. A kidney infection can sometimes lead to a dangerous condition called sepsis, which can be life threatening. Symptoms of sepsis include fever, chills, rapid breathing and heart rate, rash, and confusion.

A kidney infection that becomes chronic, or long lasting, can cause permanent damage to your kidneys.

## What causes a kidney infection?

Kidney infections are caused by bacteria or viruses.

Scientists believe that most kidney infections start as a bladder infection that moves upstream to infect one or both of your kidneys. Most often, the infection is caused by bacteria that normally live in your bowel. The urinary tract has several ways to prevent infection from moving up the urinary tract. For example, urination most often flushes out bacteria before it reaches the bladder. Sometimes your body can’t fight the bacteria and the bacteria cause a UTI. If you don’t get medical treatment to stop the infection, the bacteria may infect your kidneys. 

In some cases, your blood can carry bacteria or viruses from another part of your body to your kidneys.

Share this page
FacebookXEmailWhatsAppLinkedInRedditPinterest

*Previous:*                Definition & Facts            *Next:*                Diagnosis            

        This content is provided as a service of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases(NIDDK), part of the National Institutes of Health. NIDDK translates and disseminates research findings to increase knowledge and understanding about health and disease among patients, health professionals, and the public. Content produced by NIDDK is carefully reviewed by NIDDK scientists and other experts.

The NIDDK would like to thank:Ann E. Stapleton, MD, FIDSA, FACP, University of Washington School of Medicine