alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000006879
<NAME> APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,102,503
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    111,020
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         359,479
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        47,843
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 426,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,047,038
<COMMON>                                       260,458
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      663,633
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            179,461
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,103,552
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           22,310
<PREFERRED>                                     19,359
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,472,451
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              34,600
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  41,800
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   80,004
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     52,429
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                12,746
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,207,787
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,047,038
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,672,244
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            60,477
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,383,224
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,443,701
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        228,543
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              (8,301)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 220,242
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       126,912
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,330
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,497
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   90,833
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       118,916
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       72,057
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         274,164
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dwayne Blyden, Appellant.

*[963*NYS2d 861]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered November 10, 2010, as amended June 21, 2012, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 364 days, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of adjudicating defendant a youthful offender, and otherwise affirmed.

We find the sentence excessive to the extent it did not include youthful offender treatment.

Concur—Acosta, J.E, Moskowitz, Renwick, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Lucchese Boot Co.

, Bartolo Mata, and

Rigoberto Gutierrez

Appellant ’ s

,

v.

Jose Solano

.

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00 229

- C V

Appeal from the

34 th Judicial District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2007

- 1198 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee ’ s third motion for extension of time to file the brief

until January 12

, 2015

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO F ILE

THE APPELLEE ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon

. Jeffrey B. Pownell , the Appelle e ’ s Attorney

,

prepare the Appellee ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before January 12 , 201 5

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22 nd day of December , 20 1 4

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.

(Hughes, J., not participating)
EXHIBIT 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - VI A (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

       (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of the
            operations of the Partnership.


           August 14, 2008                   /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
           ---------------                   ------------------------
                Date                         Joseph M. Jayson,
                                               Individual General Partner and
                                               Principal Financial Officer
97-531.

#### State ex rel. Edgington v. Fourth Appellate Dist. Court.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1


                                  ASHLAND INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual  Report of Ashland Inc.  (the  "Company") on
Form  10-K  for the  year  ended  September  30,  2002 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James J. O'Brien, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
         operations of the Company.



/s/ James J. O'Brien
--------------------------------
James J. O'Brien
Chief Executive Officer
December 3, 2002
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
 CALCULATION OF THE MAXIMUM NOTES BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2006
UNDER THE SENIOR SECURED NOTES FACILITY DATED JANUARY 13, 2005
 I. Lesser of:A. the product of:1. the Free Cash Flow Multiple
    
    
    8.0 xMultiplied by2. Services Business Free Cash Flow
    
    $
    7,335$
    58,680OrB. the product of:x. 2.0 times
    
    
    2.0xmultiplied byy. Services Business Revenue
    
    $
    29,815$
    59,630II. Lesser of1. 50% of the results of the immediately preceding clause (I)
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    29,340Or2. 30% of the Companys After-tax PV10
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    11,534III. 10% of the Companys After-tax PV10
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    3,845Maximum Notes Balance = (I) + (II) + (III)
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    74,059Aggregate Notes Outstanding at Determination Date
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    47,500Companys After-tax PV10 as of 6/30/06
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    38,446Services Business Revenue {Section 2(a)(xxxx)}
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    29,815Services Business operating income
    
    $
    10,729Services Business depreciation and amortization expense
    
    
    1,292Less: Any net operating income from affiliates
    
    
    (A) Services Business net operating income before interest,
taxes,
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    12,021(B) Aggregate interest paid on permitted indebtedness
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Services Business capital expenditures
    
    $
    (5,739
    )Less: Issuances of stock by Infinity, less costs
    
    
    1,053(4,686
    )Less: Aggregate interest expense
    
    
    (
    )Services Business capital expenditures, not funded
    
    
    (4,686
    )
    
    
    (4,686
    )Services Free Cash Flow {Section 2(a)(xxxix)}
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    7,335
#### In the Matter of Anonymous et al., Appellants, v Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Respondent.

Submitted February 27, 2012;

decided May 1, 2012

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
#### In the Matter of Waheem Allah, Petitioner, v Michael R. Sonberg et al., Respondents.

[961 NYS2d 780]

—The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, and a cross motion having been made on behalf of respondent Hon. Michael R. Sonberg to dismiss the petition, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied, the cross motion granted, and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Abdus-Salaam and Gische, JJ.
#### The State ex rel. Grinnell *v.*Mitchell, Judge.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Grinnell v. Mitchell*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 1209.]

(No. 97-131

Submitted March 18, 1997

Decided April 30, 1997.)

*Timothy Grinnell, pro se.*

*Mark E. Piepmeier,*Special Prosecuting Attorney, and *William E. Breyer,*Assistant Special Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

The motion to dismiss is granted.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs separately.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

concurring. I concur in the order of dismissal. Although we are not directing the lower court to take immediate action in this matter, I strongly urge the trial court to take note that relator’s motion has been pending for nearly one year and to make the utmost effort to expeditiously rule on this motion.
#### PETRIZZO v. UNITED STATES.

Civ. No. 2043.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

June 9, 1948.

Jacob Schwolsky, of Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff.

Adrian W. Maher, U. S. Atty., Dist. of Connecticut, of New Haven, Conn., for defendant.

SMITH, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought suit against the United States under the>Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S: C.A. §§ 1291, 1346, 1402, 1504, 2110, 2401, 2402, 2411, 2412, 2671-2680, to recover for personal injuries and damage to his car alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant’s servant.

*368After the one-year period limited by the Act for the commencement of action, plaintiff moves to amend to claim for the damage to the car as bailee rather than owner. Defendant opposes the amendment as the assertion of a new claim for relief barred by the limitation of actions in the Act.

The amendment should be allowed. The misdescription by plaintiff of the capacity in which he made claim for the damage to the car has in no way misled defendant.1 The claim is for the same damage, caused by the same alleged negligence. Plaintiff is, in each case, claiming as an individual, not in any representative capacity, although the facts governing his legal relationship to the car are stated differently in the amendment.

The plaintiff’s motion to amend the Complaint is granted.

1

 Compare Owen v. Paramount Productions, D.C.1941, 41 F.Supp. 557.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         100,023
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,687,891
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    683,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,322,456
<PP&E>                                       6,135,394
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,604,928)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,994,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,693,410
<BONDS>                                        641,198
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,250,000
<COMMON>                                     6,126,338
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,014,815)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,994,692
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,102,509
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,620,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (248,118)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                153,697
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            153,697
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (500,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (346,303)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 14, 2019

Order 

Clerk

February 14, 2019

158599(124)(130)(132)

In re RHEA BRODY LIVING TRUST, dated

January 17, 1978, as amended.

_________________________________________

ROBERT BRODY and JAY BRODY,

Intervenors-Appellants,

SC: 158599

v COA: 330871

Oakland PC: 2015-361379-TV

CATHY B. DEUTCHMAN,

Petitioner-Appellee,

and

MICHAEL BARTON, Special Fiduciary, 

Intervenor.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of conservator and successor trustee Mary 

Lyneis to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on 

December 17, 2018, is accepted for filing. On further order of the Chief Justice, the motion 

of appellants to file a response to the amicus brief and the motion of appellee to file a 

response to the amicus brief and to appellants’ response are GRANTED. The responses 

filed by appellants and appellee on January 29, 2019, and February 1, 2019, respectively, 

are accepted for filing.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2987 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the exceptions 

process for one year with respect to caps on payments for therapy 

services under the Medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2010 

Mr. ENSIGN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend 

the exceptions process for one year with respect to caps 

on payments for therapy services under the Medicare 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing Effective and 

5 Necessary Individual Outpatient Rehabilitation Services 

6 (SENIORS) Act of 2010’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2987 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCEPTIONS PROCESS FOR MEDI2 CARE THERAPY CAPS. 

3 (a) EXTENSION.—Section 1833(g)(5) of the Social 

4 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(g)(5)) is amended by strik5 ing ‘‘December 31, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

6 2010’’. 

7 (b) REVISION TO THE MEDICARE IMPROVEMENT

8 FUND.—Section 1898(b)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 1395iii(b)(1)(A)), as amended by section 

10 1011(b) of the Department of Defense Appropriations 

11 Act, 2010 (Public Law 111–118), is amended by striking 

12 ‘‘$20,740,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$20,340,000,000’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The
undersigned officer hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of COMFORCE Corporation for the fiscal year December 28, 2003 as to which this Certification is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of COMFORCE
Corporation.



Date: March 26, 2004



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ John C. Fanning                 
|John C. Fanning,                    
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2987 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2987

     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the 
 exceptions process for one year with respect to caps on payments for 
              therapy services under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 4, 2010

  Mr. Ensign introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the 
 exceptions process for one year with respect to caps on payments for 
              therapy services under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securing Effective and Necessary 
Individual Outpatient Rehabilitation Services (SENIORS) Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCEPTIONS PROCESS FOR MEDICARE THERAPY CAPS.

    (a) Extension.--Section 1833(g)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395l(g)(5)) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2009'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2010''.
    (b) Revision to the Medicare Improvement Fund.--Section 
1898(b)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395iii(b)(1)(A)), 
as amended by section 1011(b) of the Department of Defense 
Appropriations Act, 2010 (Public Law 111-118), is amended by striking 
``$20,740,000,000'' and inserting ``$20,340,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Alexander J.S., an Infant. Steuben County Department of Social Services, Respondent; David J.S., Jr., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[978 NYS2d 707]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Marianne Furfure, A.J.), entered December 13, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order denied the motion of respondent David J.S., Jr. to dismiss the neglect petition against him.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Lindley, Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 23.1





                                       
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Micro Warehouse, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 
333-33945 and 333-47163) on Form S-8 and (Nos. 333-59561 and 333-71131) on 
Form S-3 if Micro Warehouse, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) of our 
reports dated February 16, 1999, related to the consolidated balance sheets 
of the Company as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated 
statements of operations, comprehensive operations, stockholders' equity and 
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 
1998, and the related schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 1998 
annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.


                                       KPMG LLP


Stamford, Connecticut
March 31, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from SEC filing Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,255   
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,642
<INVENTORY>                                     10,583
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,925
<PP&E>                                         573,866
<DEPRECIATION>                                 239,782
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 860,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           96,775
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           379
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     532,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   860,118
<SALES>                                        312,901
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               312,901
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  257,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (6,234)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,565 
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,949
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,949
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
        


</TABLE>