alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Securities & Exchange Commission EDGAR Filing


EXHIBIT 10.32

WARRANT REPURCHASE AGREEMENT

This agreement (the “Agreement”) provides for the repurchase by The Quantum Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) of certain warrants previously issued to Newbridge Securities Corporation (“Newbridge”) which provided Newbridge the opportunity to purchase an aggregate of 70,911 shares (the “Warrants”) of the Company’s common stock, no par value.




NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Newbridge, intending to be legally bound, and for good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby agree as follows:




1.

Upon the closing of the Company’s secondary public offering of securities on Form SB-2 pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Newbridge hereby agrees to permit the Company to repurchase and the Company hereby agrees to repurchase the Warrants for an aggregate purchase price of $70,911.




2.

This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Delaware without giving effect to the conflict of laws principles thereof.  All agreements in this Agreement binding upon the Company or Newbridge shall bind and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the Company and Newbridge, respectively, whether so expressed or not.




3.

This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, which when so executed shall constitute one and the same agreement.  This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may not be changed, waived, discharged, or terminated orally but, rather, only by a statement in writing signed by the party or parties against which enforcement or the change, waiver, discharge or termination is sought.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date hereof.




				
	The Quantum Group, Inc.

	 
	 

	 
	 
	                                               

	                                                                   


	By:

	/s/  Noel J. Guillama

	 
	Date: December 7, 2007


	 
	Noel J. Guillama, Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Newbridge Securities Corporation

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:

	/s/  Douglas Aguililla

	 
	Date: December 7, 2007


	 
	Douglas Aguililla, Director of Investment Banking
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 31, 2014

No. 04-13-00293-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.J.D. A Child,

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. FL-11-356

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Appellate Review Placement Hearing is DENIED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of March, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the amended  quarterly  report of Synergx  Systems Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Daniel S. Tamkin,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  and I, John A.
Poserina, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to
my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                             /s/ Daniel S. Tamkin
                                            ------------------------
                                            Daniel S. Tamkin
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            Synergx Systems Inc.
                                            June 25, 2003



                                            /s/ John A. Poserina
                                            -------------------------
                                            John A, Poserina
                                            Chief Financial  Officer
                                            Synergx Systems Inc.
                                            June 25, 2003
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alfred Emanuel MEAIS, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-6479.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 2006.

Decided July 3, 2006.

*411Alfred Emanuel Meáis, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Alfred Emanuel Meáis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on April 4, 2005. The notice of appeal was filed on March 15, 2006. Because Meáis failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ASIA MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, LTD. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000823190
<NAME> ASIA MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, LTD.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,448
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       170,132
<OTHER-SE>                                   (201,326)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,026
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,026)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,026)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,026)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements of Andrea Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form S-3 (333-114245, 333-69248, 333-51424, 33-83173, 333-61115), and Form S-8 (333-133090, 333-82738, 333-31946, 333-82375, 333-52129,
333-45421, 333-38609, 333-35687, 033-84092, 333-14385) of our report dated March 26, 2006 with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the years then ended,
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Marcum and Kliegman LLP
|                           
|Marcum and Kliegman LLP    
|Melville, New York         
|                           
|March 27, 2007
Exhibit 10.6


		
			Exhibit 10.6
		

		
			List of Holders
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
						Purchaser

					
					
						 

					
					
						Subscription Amount

				
	
					
						Key Properties, Inc.

					
					
						 

					$100,000 
				
	
					
						Steven G. Lampe

					
					
						 

					$100,000 
				
	
					
						Thomas Staz Revocable Trust

					
					
						 

					$32,500 
				
	
					
						Sanford M. Litvack

					
					
						 

					$25,000 
				



		
			﻿
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. DA 20-0295

ROBYN DRISCOLL; MONTANA DEMOCRATIC PARTY; AND DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL 

CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE,

Plaintiffs and Appellees,

V.

COREY STAPLETON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MONTANA SECRETARY OF STATE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE

(WESTERN NATIVE VOICE, MONTANA NATIVE VOTE, 

ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES OF FORT PECK, BLACKFEET 

NATION, CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBES, 

CROW TRIBE, FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY)

Upon consideration of Intervernors’ Unopposed Motion to Intervene and 

brief in support, the Court grants leave for Intervenors to intervene on behalf of the 

Plaintiffs and Appellees in this matter.

Intervenors shall file their brief on or before the date that Appellees’ 

response brief is due in accordance with this Court’s scheduling order

06/18/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0295
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have filed a true and accurate copy of the foregoing 

MOTION TO INTERVENE with the Clerk of the Montana Supreme Court, each 

attorney of record, and each party not represented by an attorney in the abovereferenced District Court action, as follows: 

Dated this 12th day of June, 2020. 

 _/s/ Alex Rate_____________

Alex Rate

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 18 2020
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2912 

To require lenders of loans with Federal guarantees or Federal insurance 

to consent to mandatory mediation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 18, 2009 

Mr. NELSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To require lenders of loans with Federal guarantees or 

Federal insurance to consent to mandatory mediation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foreclosure Mandatory 

5 Mediation Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MANDATORY MEDIATION. 

7 Title I of the Helping Families Save Their Homes 

8 Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–22; 12 U.S.C. 5201 note) 

9 is amended by adding at the end the following: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2912 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 106. MANDATORY MEDIATION. 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other pro3 vision of law, before a qualified mortgagee may initiate 

4 a foreclosure proceeding or a sheriff sale, the qualified 

5 mortgagee shall conduct, consistent with any applicable 

6 State or local requirements, a one-time mediation with the 

7 affected mortgagor and a housing counseling agency, at 

8 the expense of the qualified mortgagee. 

9 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— 

10 ‘‘(1) the term ‘housing counseling agency’ 

11 means— 

12 ‘‘(A) a housing counseling agency certified 

13 by the Secretary under section 106(e) of the 

14 Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 

15 (12 U.S.C. 1701x(e)); or 

16 ‘‘(B) a neighborhood housing services pro17 gram established by the Neighborhood Rein18 vestment Corporation under section 606 of the 

19 Housing and Community Development Amend20 ments of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 8105); and 

21 ‘‘(2) the term ‘qualified mortgagee’ means an 

22 entity— 

23 ‘‘(A) that makes a mortgage loan for, or 

24 holds a note secured by, a one- to four-family 

25 residence that is— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2912 IS

1 ‘‘(i) insured under title II of the Na2 tional Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1707 et 

3 seq.); 

4 ‘‘(ii) guaranteed, insured, or made 

5 under chapter 37 of title 38, United States 

6 Code; 

7 ‘‘(iii) made, guaranteed, or insured 

8 under title V of the Housing Act of 1949 

9 (42 U.S.C. 1471 et seq.); or 

10 ‘‘(iv) eligible for purchase by the Fed11 eral National Mortgage Association or the 

12 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corpora13 tion; or 

14 ‘‘(B) that is acting, or otherwise author15 ized to act, as the mortgagee of record for a 

16 lender, including any entity, such as the Mort17 gage Electronic Registration Systems or 

18 MERS, acting as a nominee for a lender in any 

19 suit brought against a mortgagor.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
               EXTRACTED FROM THE ARMCO INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
               AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN
               ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                            189,900
<SECURITIES>                        5,000
<RECEIVABLES>                     147,000
<ALLOWANCES>                        4,000
<INVENTORY>                       268,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  637,400
<PP&E>                          1,305,500
<DEPRECIATION>                    653,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,881,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             386,300
<BONDS>                           306,900
<COMMON>                            1,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                       185,900
<OTHER-SE>                       (339,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,881,300
<SALES>                         1,829,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,829,300
<CGS>                           1,623,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,623,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 35,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    79,400
<INCOME-TAX>                        2,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                77,100
<DISCONTINUED>                      2,700
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    (3,000)
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       76,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.55
        

</TABLE>
WHITE EARTH RESERVATION

CHAIRMAN Michael Fairbanks SECRETARY-TREASURER Michael LaRoque 

DISTRICT I Henry Fox DISTRICT II Eugene Sommers DISTRICT III Cheryl “Annie” Jackson

July 28, 2022 

VIA ELECTRONIC AND U.S. MAIL 

information@nigc.gov 

Mr. E. Sequoyah Simermeyer, Chair 

National Indian Gaming Commission 

1849 C. Street NW 

Mail Stop #1621 

Washington, D.C. 20240 

Re: Comments on proposed rule creating 3rd Tier financial reporting 

for charitable gaming operations 

Dear Chairman, Simermeyer & Members of the Commission:

The White Earth Tribal Gaming Commission (“WE Gaming Commission”) supports the proposed rule creating a third tier financial 

reporting for charitable gaming operations. The current regulations create insurmountable burdens on small and charitable gaming 

activities within the exterior boundaries of the White Earth Reservation. Most bingo nights and other small charitable events generate

less than $5,000 in net revenue on an annual basis. The cost of complying with current audit requirements exceed the net revenue

generated from such events. The result is that most small charitable events have ceased within White Earth’s jurisdiction. This is

unfortunate because these activities support important cultural events such as school trips, church fundraisers, and community

celebrations. The proposed rule change should encourage the resumption of small and charitable gaming events at White Earth. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the WE Gaming Commission is concerned that the proposed rule gives unilateral authority to the NIGC

Chair to revoke the status of a charitable gaming operation that otherwise meets the requirements for third tier financial reporting

should (a) the assets of the charitable operation fail to be “appropriately safeguarded” or should (b) revenue be “misused under IGRA”.

Additional clarification as to the highlighted terms will create more certainty as to causes for a revocation and would lessen the

possibility of arbitrary and capricious decision making. 

Thank you for opportunity to submit these comments for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Chris Londo 

CHAIRMAN

WHITE EARTH TRIBAL GAMING COMMISSION

Cc: Christie Haverkamp 

Leif E. Rasmussen 

White Earth RBC 

P.O. Box 418 | White Earth, Minnesota 56591 | Tel. (218) 983-3285 | Fax (218) 983-3641
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC California Housing
Tax Credits III, L.P. (the  "Partnership")  for the year ended March 31, 2008 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Melanie  R.  Wenk,  Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/Melanie R. Wenk
------------------
Melanie R. Wenk
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Date:  October 9, 2009
----

Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Michael Ash, CFO of The Tirex Corporation (the "Company")do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

1. 

This QuarterlyReport on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

2. 

The information contained inthe report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

*/s/ Michael Ash, CFO           * Michael Ash, CFO 

Date: May 6, 2008 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed balance sheets and unaudited condensed statements of
income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to
date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         288,227
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    129,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               539,534
<PP&E>                                       1,869,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,450,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,070,429
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     3,898,817
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (3,021,853)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,450,418
<SALES>                                        104,063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,063
<CGS>                                          167,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,966,842
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,969
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,066,493)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,067,293)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,067,293)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.141)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.141)


</TABLE>