alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                              13,405
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      131,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,142
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   151,962
<PP&E>                                             113,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                      75,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     268,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              128,214
<BONDS>                                            127,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            15,917
<OTHER-SE>                                          (4,131)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       268,310
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   512,660
<CGS>                                              477,264
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      554,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (42,966)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        13,134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (56,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (69,906)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (126,118)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (7.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
Unit 7

Fuels and Fire Behavior

Unit  Objectives

Identify key elements of the fire environment:

        Fuels

        Weather

        Topography

        Fire behavior

Pre-burn ReconnaissanceFuels

Targeted participants:

      	- Pilot 

      	- Burn Boss/Firing Boss

A thorough recon of the burn area and a discussion of the burn objectives are essential to a successful firing operation

Fire environment elements to consider during the recon include:

Fuel type and loading

Fuel moisture

Chemical properties

Fuel size, shape and compactness

Vertical arrangement and horizontal continuity

Pre-burn ReconnaissanceWeather Factors

Temperature

Relative humidity

Inversions

Wind

       - Direction

      - Speed 

      - Duration

      - Local influences

Recent and expected precipitation

4

Pre-burn ReconnaissanceTopography

Slope

Aspect

Elevation

Local influences

  - Canyon

  - Lakes

  - Mountains

  - Glaciers

Pre-burn ReconnaissanceFire Behavior

Fire types

     - Surface

     - Crown

Fire growth characteristics

     - Head fires

     - Backing fires

     - Flank fires

Aerial Firing Ignition Patterns

Strip-head

Spot

Chevron

Center

Backing fire

Or a combination of the above

Fire Interaction

Fuels, weather, topography, fire behavior, and ignition patterns all interact to create fire effects.

Adjustments to firing patterns can be made to produce fire effects that will meet burn objective. 

Unit  Objectives

Identify key elements of the fire environment:

        Fuels

        Weather

        Topography

        Fire behavior

# image2.png

# image3.jpeg

# image4.jpeg

# image5.jpeg
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3044 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 

qualified motor vehicle taxes for motor homes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2010 

Mr. BAYH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the deduction for qualified motor vehicle taxes for motor 

homes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED 

4 MOTOR VEHICLE TAXES FOR MOTOR HOMES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (G) of section 

6 164(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend7 ed by inserting ‘‘(December 31, 2011, in the case of a 

8 motor home)’’ after ‘‘December 31, 2009’’. 

9 (b) INCLUSION OF RECREATION VEHICLE TRAILER

10 AND SLIDE-IN CAMPER.—Section 164(b)(6)(D) of the InVerDate Nov 24 2008 22:54 Feb 26, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3044.IS S3044

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3044 IS

1 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

2 clause (ii) and inserting the following new clauses: 

3 ‘‘(ii) MOTORCYCLE.—The term ‘mo4 torcycle’ has the meaning given such term 

5 under section 571.3 of title 49, Code of 

6 Federal Regulations (as in effect on the 

7 date of the enactment of this paragraph). 

8 ‘‘(iii) MOTOR HOME.—The term 

9 ‘motor home’ has the meaning given such 

10 term under section 571.3 of such title, and 

11 includes a recreation vehicle trailer (as de12 fined in section 571.3 of such title) and a 

13 slide-in camper (as defined in section 

14 575.103 of such title).’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to purchases after December 31, 

17 2009, in tax years ending after such date. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2829 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2829

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the cost of labor 
 for building envelope improvements to be included for purposes of the 
                nonbusiness energy property tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 3, 2009

 Mr. Wyden (for himself, Ms. Stabenow, and Mrs. Gillibrand) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                               on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the cost of labor 
 for building envelope improvements to be included for purposes of the 
                nonbusiness energy property tax credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION TO NONBUSINESS ENERGY PROPERTY CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 25C(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following 
flush sentence:
        ``Such term includes expenditures for labor costs properly 
        allocable to the onsite preparation, assembly, or original 
        installation of the component.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000821616
<NAME>                        BENTLEY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         509
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                   23
<INVENTORY>                                    764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,862
<PP&E>                                         4,297
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,264)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,651
<BONDS>                                        5,258
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          2,271
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       69
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,079
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,367
<SALES>                                        4,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,312
<CGS>                                          2,440
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               13
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,088)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,088)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,088)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.33)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc.
Columbia, MD

          We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-40606 and
the Registration Statement on Form S-8 file No 333-03718) of our report dated
November 22, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Hemagen
Diagnostics, Inc. appearing in Hemagen's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended September 30, 2004.





Grant Thornton, LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
December 23, 2004
#### Giovanni Guerrero SANTOS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 04-71122, 05-70990.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 14, 2006.

Filed Dec. 15, 2006.

*712Reeves & Associates, APLC, San Francisco, CA, Nancy E. Miller, Esq., Robert L. Reeves & Associates, Cynthia J. Scribe, Esq., Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Marion E. Guy-ton, Esq., Mark C. Walters, Esq., Mary Jane Candaux, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Circuit Judge, FARRIS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

In this consolidated proceeding, petitioner Giovanni Guerrero Santos petitions for review of the BIA’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal, denial of a motion to reopen visa adjustment proceedings, and affirmance of the INS’s decision to revoke a previously approved visa.

Petitioner’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail because he cannot show that fear of future persecution on account of his former political activities is objectively reasonable. Though one member of his former political group was killed, it is far from clear that he was killed on account of his political affiliation, much less by government officials or forces the government is unwilling or unable to control. *See Gormley v. Ashcroft,*364 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir.2004).

The dispositive issue on petitioner’s two remaining claims is whether he is eligible for relief in light of his prior sham marriage. By statute, relief is barred where a noncitizen has been a party to any sham marriage in the past, regardless of whether his current marriage is bona fide. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1154(c). Petitioner was party to such a marriage.

*713The petitions for review must therefore be denied.

Petitions for review are DENIED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**EXHIBIT 24**

 

INDEPENDENTAUDITORS’ CONSENT

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement No. 33-19180 of Analysts InternationalCorporation on Form S-8 of our report on the financial statements of theAnalysts International Corporation Savings and Investment Plan, dated April 8,2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 11-K filed under cover of Form10-K/A of Analysts International Corporation for the six months ended December31, 2002.

 

 
| /s/ Deloitte  & Touche LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| Minneapolis,  Minnesota        |
| April 25,  2003                |

 

----
Exhibit 99.2


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") by Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.


                                              /s/ Michael D. Price
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Michael D. Price
                                              Vice President, Chief Financial
                                              Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
                                              (Chief financial officer)

                                              May 13, 2003


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO BENTLEY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY BENTLEY
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### Larry RUTHER, Appellant v. U.S. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, Appellee.

No. 06-5189.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 19, 2006.

Larry Ruther, Manassas, VA, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed May 8, 2006, *29and May 80, 2006, be affirmed. The district court did not err in dismissing appellant’s complaint, because it appears that appellant did not establish the existence of a contract with the federal government and did not plead his claim of fraud with the particularity required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b). To the extent appellant alleged a tort claim, he has failed to show exhaustion of his administrative remedies as required by the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671*et seq.*Moreover, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration of the dismissal of the case. *See Firestone v. Firestone,*76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C.Cir.1996).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Gross Gaming Revenue Trending

FY15: Indian gaming industry’s largest year-over-year 

GGR increase during past 10 years.

($B)

Source: National Indian Gaming Commission
EXHIBIT 10.1

                                TAY CHONG WENG
                              M-3-19 Plaza Damas
                              Sri Hartamas, 50480
                            Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia


                              November 1, 2007

Greater Asia Realty Holdings, Ltd.
M-3-19 Plaza Damas
Sri Hartamas, 50480
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

To the Board of Directors:

       In  order  to  pursue  our  business  plan,  if  we  are unable to raise
sufficient  funds from our public offering or other financing  to  satisfy  our
minimum cash  requirements  to  initiate  operations and the purchase of income
producing  properties,  I  agree to lend such  funds  to  Greater  Asia  Realty
Holdings, Ltd. up to US$125,000.

       I will be willing to  lend those funds for a minimum period of 12 months
at an interest rate equal to the prime rate of Citibank N.A. (USA). I presently
have in excess of US$125,000 in readily available liquid funds.

       Please accept this letter  as  my  formal  personal  commitment,  as  an
individual  and not as an officer and director of Greater Asia Realty Holdings,
Ltd.

                                              Very truly yours,


                                              /s/ Tay Chong Weng
                                              ----------------------------
                                              Tay Chong Weng
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October

3, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00534-CR

EUGENE LEWIS III, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 56th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17-CR-3673

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Eugene Lewis III, has signed and filed a written request to 

dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this court has not delivered 

an opinion, we grant appellant’s request.
2

Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. We direct the clerk of the court 

to issue the mandate of the court immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Jewell, Bourliot. and Zimmerer 

Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
#### SOCIETE INTERNATIONALE POUR PARTICIPATIONS INDUSTRIELLES ET COMMERCIALES, S. A. v. BROWNELL et al.

Civ. A. No. 4360-48.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

Nov. 16, 1953.

See also 14 F.R.D. 44.

Whiteford, Hart, Carmody & Wilson, John J. Wilson, Washington, D. C. (Perder Konz, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Dallas S. Townsend, Asst. Atty. Gen., David Schwartz, Sp. Asst, to the Atty. Gen., Sidney B. Jacoby, Paul E. Mc-Graw, and Ernest S. Carsten, Washington, D. C., fair defendants.

Henry G. Fischer and Odell Kominers, Washington, D. *6.,*Graubard & Moskovitz, New York City, for intervenor plaintiffs Kaufman and others.

Hogan & Hartson, Edmund L. Jones, Paul R. Connolly and C. Frank Reifsnyder, Washington, D. C., for intervenor plaintiffs Attenhofer and others.

Henry F. Butter, Washington, D. C., for intervenor plaintiffs Klingler and others.

LAWS, Chief Judge.

Upon review of the proceedings in this case, and particularly developments since the last extension of time granted plaintiff to produce documents and records called for originally by order dated July 5, 1949, Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A. v. Clark, D.C., 9 F.R.D. 263, the Court is of opinion there is no reasonable likelihood plaintiff will be able to accomplish the full production required by law. During a period of more than four years, plaintiff’s efforts to make full production or accomplish full access to documents and records, such as was required by the Government of Switzerland in determining the same issues as are raised in this suit, have proved to be *84futile. Any less production or access will not comply with the requirement of Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., which governs this Court. Accordingly, the Court is constrained to deny plaintiff’s motion to vacate Paragraph 4 (as amended) of the order of March 31, 1953, and to extend time to make further discovery under the order of July 5, 1949, and will dismiss its suit with prejudice.

Counsel will prepare the appropriate order.
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-16 September, 2008
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-17 September, 2008
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-18 September, 2008
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-19 September, 2008
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-20 September, 2008
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-21 September, 2008
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-22 September, 2008
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-23 September, 2008
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-24 September, 2008
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-25 September, 2008
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-26 September, 2008
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-27 September, 2008
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-28 September, 2008
OPM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS 4-29 September, 2008
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132147 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132147 COA: 270858 Saginaw CC: 97-014075-FC ANDREW SCOTT TACKEBURY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 4, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

p1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13065]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

Board Votes To Close June 2, 2009, Meeting

    At its closed session meeting on May 5, 2009, the Board of 
Governors of the United States Postal Service voted unanimously to 
close to public observation its meeting to be held on June 2, 2009, in 
Washington, DC via teleconference. The Board determined that no earlier 
public notice was possible.

Items Considered

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Financial Matters.
    3. Pricing.
    4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    5. Governors' Executive Session--discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

General Counsel Certification

    The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has 
certified that the meeting is properly closed under the Government in 
the Sunshine Act.

Contact Person for More Information

    Requests for information about the meeting should be addressed to 
the Secretary of the Board, Julie S. Moore, at (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13065 Filed 6-1-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P