alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John B. Bell, Appellant, v New York State Higher Education Services Corporation, Respondent.

Submitted March 19, 2012;

decided May 3, 2012

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from that portion of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from the September 2009 Supreme Court order, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the remaining portion of the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from the September 2009 Supreme Court order, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remaining portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit 99.1
                               ASHLAND INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual  Report of Ashland Inc.  (the  "Company") on
Form 10-K/A as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, James J. O'Brien, Chief Executive Officer of
the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, to the best of
my knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
         operations of the Company.




/s/ James J. O'Brien
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
March 20, 2003
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc.
Columbia, MD

          We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-80009,
333-06147, 33-40606 and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 file No
333-03718) of our report dated November 21, 2001, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. appearing in Hemagen's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2001.









Grant Thornton, LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
December  18, 2001
{"agency":"NIGC","generated":"2018-10-25 14:53:45","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"}],"value":"2018"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["NIGC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["14"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["15"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["6"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2018","quarter":"Q4"}
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3045 

To direct the Secretary of Commerce to study the Gulf of Mexico red snapper 

fishery and to limit the authority of the Secretary to promulgate any 

interim rules for the fishery, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2010 

Mr. NELSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Commerce to study the Gulf 

of Mexico red snapper fishery and to limit the authority 

of the Secretary to promulgate any interim rules for 

the fishery, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gulf of Mexico Red 

5 Snapper Fishery Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GULF OF MEXICO RED SNAPPER FISHERY. 

7 (a) STOCK ASSESSMENT.— 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3045 IS

1 (1) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Com2 merce shall conduct a benchmark stock assessment 

3 of the Gulf of Mexico red snapper fishery. 

4 (2) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary of 

5 Commerce shall submit to Congress a report on the 

6 findings of the assessment required by paragraph 

7 (1). 

8 (b) LIMITATION ON RULES TO SHORTEN FISHING

9 SEASON.— 

10 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Commerce 

11 may not promulgate any interim rule under section 

12 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conserva13 tion and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1855(c)) or 

14 any final rule that decreases the number of fishing 

15 days in the Gulf of Mexico red snapper fishery to 

16 less than the number of such days in 2009— 

17 (A) prior to the date the Secretary submits 

18 to Congress the report required by subsection 

19 (a)(2); and 

20 (B) unless such report demonstrates the 

21 need for any such an interim or final rule. 

22 (2) EXISTING INTERIM RULES.—Any interim 

23 rule promulgated under section 305(c) of the Mag24 nuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Manage25 ment Act (16 U.S.C. 1855(c)) that decreases the 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3045 IS

1 number of fishing days in the Gulf of Mexico red 

2 snapper fishery to less than the number of such days 

3 in 2009 that was promulgated prior to the date of 

4 the enactment of this Act shall have no force or ef5 fect. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
-  Home 
        -  Health Information 
        -  Urologic Diseases 
        -  Kidney Stones 
        -  Symptoms & Causes 

        - English
        - Español

Kidney Stones
-  Definition & Facts 
-  Symptoms & Causes 
-  Diagnosis 
-  Treatment 
-  Eating, Diet, & Nutrition 
-  Clinical Trials 

# Symptoms & Causes of Kidney Stones

## What are the symptoms of kidney stones?

Symptoms of kidney stones include
          - sharp pains in your back, side, lower  abdomen , or groin
          - pink, red, or brown blood in your urine, also called  hematuria
          - a constant need to urinate
          - pain while urinating
          - inability to urinate or can only urinate a small amount
          - cloudy or bad-smelling urine

See a health care professional right away if you have any of these symptoms. These symptoms may mean you have a kidney stone or a more serious condition.

Your pain may last for a short or long time or may come and go in waves. Along with pain, you may have
          - nausea
          - vomiting

Other symptoms include
          - fever
          - chills

## What causes kidney stones?

Kidney stones are caused by high levels of calcium, oxalate, and phosphorus in the urine. These minerals are normally found in urine and do not cause problems at low levels.

Certain foods may increase the chances of having a kidney stone in people who are more likely to develop them.

Share this page
FacebookXEmailWhatsAppLinkedInRedditPinterest

*Previous:*                Definition & Facts            *Next:*                Diagnosis            

        This content is provided as a service of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases(NIDDK), part of the National Institutes of Health. NIDDK translates and disseminates research findings to increase knowledge and understanding about health and disease among patients, health professionals, and the public. Content produced by NIDDK is carefully reviewed by NIDDK scientists and other experts.
| ATTEST:                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   | ANDREA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |                           |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |                           |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |                           |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |                           |   |   |   |   |
|      /s/      CORISA L. GUIFFRE                    |   | By:                            |   |   | /s/      DOUGLAS J. ANDREA |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |                           |   |   | For the Entire Board of Directors |   |
Sample Audit Checklist for CJIS Security Policy Area 1 

# QUESTION YES NO N/A STANDARD COMMENT 

Page 1 of 1 

5.1 Information Exchange Agreements 

1. Before exchanging CHRI with a Tribe or TGRA, 

the NIGC must enter into a formal agreement—

such as its CHRI MOU— with the Tribe/TGRA 

to specify security controls. Exchanging CHRI 

includes electronic mail, web services, facsimile, 

hard copy and information systems sending, 

receiving and storing CHRI. 

Does the Tribe or TGRA possess or receive 

CHRI from the NIGC? ____ ____ ____ CSP 5.1.1 

2. The NIGC CHRI MOU outlines the procedures 

for handling, processing, communicating and 

storing CHRI to protect it from unauthorized 

disclosure, alteration or misuse. The MOU 

incorporates the requirements of the CSP. 

Has the Tribe or TGRA entered into the CHRI 

MOU? If so, have they entered into the most 

recent version of the CHRI MOU? Please 

confirm the dates of the signatures on the MOU 

and indicate them here. ____ ____ ____ CSP 5.1.1 

3. Has the Tribe or TGRA established procedures 

for handling CJI/CHRI to protect them from 

unauthorized disclosure, alteration or misuse? ____ ____ ____ CSP 5.1.1.1 

4. Has the Tribe or TGRA established procedures 

for processing CJI/CHRI to protect it from 

unauthorized disclosure, alteration or misuse? ____ ____ ____ CSP 5.1.1.1 

5. Has the Tribe or TGRA established procedures 

for communicating CJI/CHRI to protect it from 

unauthorized disclosure, alteration or misuse? ____ ____ ____ CSP 5.1.1.1 

6. Has the Tribe or TGRA established procedures 

for storing CJI/CHRI to protect it from 

unauthorized disclosure, alteration or misuse? ____ ____ ____ CSP 5.1.1.1
#### Charmaine Mangaroo, Appellant, v James Beckman et al., Respondents.

Submitted December 13, 2010;

decided February 24, 2011

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the judgment of Supreme Court denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remaining portions of the Appellate Division order sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
EXHIBIT - 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - VI A (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General
Partner and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  the operations of the Partnership.


         November 14, 2003                     /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
         -----------------                     ------------------------------
               Date                            Joseph M. Jayson,
                                               Individual General Partner and
                                               Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         167,222
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,541,978
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,424,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,392,421
<PP&E>                                       2,100,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,279,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,964,969
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,391,867
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,279,683
<SALES>                                     10,675,144
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,675,144
<CGS>                                        7,366,610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,571,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (66,037)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,045,779
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (293,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            752,579
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   752,579
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32


</TABLE>
25 C.F.R. Part 502 – Management Definitions

Regulation – Discussion Draft

Page 1 of 1

NIGC DISCUSSION DRAFT 01/19/2018 Version

Management – Discussion Draft

Add to 25 C.F.R. Part 502 - Definitions:

§ 502.25 Management.

1. Management means planning, organizing, directing, coordinating, controlling or the 

performance of any one of these with respect to all or part of a gaming operation.

2. Management includes, but is not limited to, planning, organizing, directing, 

coordinating, or controlling:

(a) the daily operations;

(b) the maintenance of a facility or facilities;

(c) the training, supervision, direction, hiring, firing, retention, compensation 

(including benefits) of any employee (whether or not a management employee) or 

contractor;

(d) any employment or working policies, procedures, or practices;

(e) the hours or days of operation;

(f) any accounting systems or procedures;

(g) any advertising, promotions or other marketing activities;

(h) the purchase, lease, or substitution of any gaming device or related equipment or 

software, including player tracking equipment;

(i) the vendor, type, theme, percentage of pay-out, display or placement of any 

gaming device or equipment; 

(j) the budgeting, allocation, or conditioning of payments of the gaming operation’s 

operating expenses; or

(k) the supervision of construction or improvements.
97-401.

#### Franklin Iron & Metal Corp. v. Ohio Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Comp. Bd.

Montgomery App. No. 15904. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that no conflict exists within the meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B). This cause is therefore dismissed.

*1451Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur.

Douglas, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
#### Victor Y. Batshever, Appellant, v Daniel Black et al., Respondents.

Submitted February 27, 2012;

decided May 1, 2012

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain it *(see*CPLR 5602). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
EXHIBIT 32


                 ADVANCED ENERGY RECOVERY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES




          Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and
                            Chief Executive Officer

     I, Charles A. Holtgraves, Chief Executive officer (Principal Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer), certify that this quarterly report on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ended (June 30,2004) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that the information contained herein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced Energy
Recovery, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the periods presented.


Date: June 15, 2005                         /s/  Charles A. Holtgraves
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                 Charles A. Holtgraves
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST&YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-97099) pertaining to the 2002
Outside Director Restricted Stock Plan and the 2001 Stock Option Plan of Anacomp, Inc. of our report dated December 12, 2002 (except note 4, as to which the date is
December 19, 2002), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Anacomp, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the nine months ended
September 30, 2002 (Reorganized Company) and the three months ended December 31, 2001 (Predecessor Company). The consolidated financial statements of Anacomp, Inc. for the years
ended September 30, 2001 and 2000, were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors opinion on those statements contained an explanatory paragraph relating to the
Company's ability to Continue as a going concern in their report dated November 21, 2001.

| |  |                  
| |  | -----------------
| |  | Ernst & Young LLP

December 19,
2002
San Diego, CA

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHS Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended February 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John D. Johnson,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.


/s/ John D. Johnson
-------------------------------------
John D. Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Rocio Zamora, Respondent, v New York Neurologic Associates et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Appellant.

Submitted February 28, 2011;

decided April 5, 2011

Motion to dismiss appeal by New York Neurologic Associates et al. denied.
**Appendix 1**

**Fire and Aviation Preparedness Review Guide**

**Suggested Drill**

**Skill #04*Fire and Aviation Preparedness Review Guide***

**Belt Weather Kit**

April 2000

A-

Skill 4-1Revised 2008
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,848]


MAG Automation and Controls, Machesney Park, IL; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 24, 2009, in response to a 
petition filed on behalf of workers at MAG Automation and Controls, 
Machesney Park, Illinois.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of May 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13461 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P