alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
filing of the amended
Annual Report of LanOptics Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the period
ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Meir D. Burstin, Chairman of the Board of Directors of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |  | BY: /S/ Meir D. Burstin
Meir D. BurstinPrincipal Executive Officer June 21, 2006
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* The originally executed copy of
this Certification will be maintained at the Company's offices and will be made available
for inspection upon request.



---

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7789

DAVID JUNIOR SHIVELEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PAUL KIRBY, Commissioner, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-392) Submitted: March 25, 2002 Decided: April 16, 2002 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Junior Shiveley, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: David Junior Shiveley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Shiveley v. Kirby , No. CA-99- 392 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Alliance Health, Inc.
File No. 33-17387

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Health, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2005 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Sarkis
J.  Kechejian,  Chief  Executive  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: October 11, 2007                        /s/ Sarkis J. Kechejian, M. D.
       ------------------                      ---------------------------------
                                                      Sarkis J. Kechejian, M. D.
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alliance Health,  Inc. and will be retained by Alliance Health, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Delar WILKINS, also known as Delmar Wilkins, also known as Delman Wilkins, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-20518

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 20, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Delar Wilkins appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He raises two issues in this appeal.

First, Wilkins argues the district court erred by finding that his prior Texas felony conviction for burglary of a habitation was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. §§ 2K2.1(a)(2) and 4B1.2(a). The district court correctly found that Wilkins’s prior *446conviction for burglary of a habitation was a conviction for a crime of violence. *See United States v. Garcia-Mendez,*420 F.3d 454, 456-57 (5th Cir.2005), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1398, 164 L.Ed.2d 100 (2006); *United States v. Hornsby,*88 F.3d 336, 339 (5th Cir.1996).

Second, Wilkins contends that the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), is unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause because it criminalizes the possession of firearms which do not substantially affect interstate commerce and that there was insufficient evidence to establish there was a substantial effect on interstate commerce. Wilkins correctly concedes that these arguments are foreclosed by circuit precedent. *See United States v. Daugherty,*264 F.3d 513, 518 *&*n. 12 (5th Cir.2001). He raises the issues to preserve them for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
----

Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATION

I, _John L. Threshie Jr., certify that: 

(1) I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of The TirexCorporation; 

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small businessissuer and have: 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

*/s/ John L. Threshie Jr        *John L. Threshie Jr., CEO 

Date: May 14, 2007 

----
#### In the Matter of Carlos Rueda, M.D., Chairman, Department of Psychiatry, Montefiore North Medical Center, Respondent, v Charmaine D., Appellant.

Submitted March 14, 2011;

decided March 24, 2011

Motion by New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation *811for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of EZchip Semiconductor Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dror Israel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: March 25, 2010




By:
/s/ Dror Israel*Dror IsraelChief Financial Officer





* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall Jones, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
      best
      of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Randall Jones


Randall
      Jones


Chief
      Financial Officer


June
      21,
      2005
Approving Official Batch Memo 

Date: Unit Batch Number*: 

(Example: ID-BOD-001) 

To: Casual Payment Center MS 270 

3833 S Development Ave 

Boise, ID 83705-5354 

(Please overnight mail / Call Casual Payment Center for Saturday delivery) 

From: 

Name Phone Number 

Unit Address 

 Check here if you would like a confirmation of processed batch sent to you. 

Government Email address for batch confirmation 

Subject: Payment of Casual Hire, Incident Time Reports (OF-288) 

Attached are the forms necessary for processing casual hire payrolls as follows: 

Number of OF-288s in Batch: 

Number of Casual Names submitted (attach list): 

(For Crews attach Crew Manifest) 

Incidental Expenses: Pay $5 a day for all casuals listed. Starting Date Ending Date . 

*** Provide only if no other travel costs are incurred *** 

I have verified, attached, or have on file the following: 

1. OF-288s have been audited and are attached, including signatures of the casual (if available) and an 

original Time Officer signature on line 21 of the OF-288. 

2. I-9s are completed and on file at the hiring unit, (the CPC will return any I-9s to the hiring unit). 

3. W-4s and State withholding forms are complete and attached, or previously submitted. 

4. Verified Cost Accounting Data. 

5. Other (explain): 

........................................................................................................................................ 

If you have any questions, please contact at . 

As approving official, I certify the attached travel reimbursement and OF-288s are accurate, appropriate, and 

legal for payment and meet the provisions of the Department of the Interior Pay Plan for Emergency Workers. 

Print Approving Official Name: 

APPROVING OFFICIAL SIGNATURE: 

Job Title: 

*A unique batch number should be assigned to each payroll submitted. Please reference the applicable batch number when contacting 

the Casual Payment Center with questions. 
          

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

Batch Number: *EFT OR EFT

Waiver

Name of Casual

OF‐288W‐4EFT*EFT Waiver*FEHBOther

20

21

22

23

24

25
<PAGE>


<TABLE>
                                                      Exhibit 21

                                ARMCO INC.
                               SUBSIDIARIES

<CAPTION>
                                                     State/Country of 
           Name                                         Incorporation
           ----                                     ------------------
<S>                                                      <S>
AFSG Holdings, Inc.                                      Delaware

Armco Europe Limited                                     United Kingdom

Armco Financial Services Corporation                     Delaware

Armco Financial Services International, Inc.             Ohio

Armco Financial Services International, Ltd.             Delaware

Armco Funding Corporation                                Delaware

Armco Insurance Group Inc.                               Delaware

Armco Limited                                            United Kingdom

Armco Management Corporation                             Delaware

Armco Pacific Financial Services Limited                 Vanuatu

Armco Pacific Limited                                    Singapore

Compass Insurance Company                                Delaware

Douglas Dynamics, L.L.C.                                 Delaware

FSA Services Corp.                                       Delaware

Materials Insurance Company                              Cayman Islands

Northwestern National Insurance Company                  Wisconsin
     of Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Talbico, Inc.                                            New York

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          22,243                  22,243
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,632                  31,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    115,042                 115,042
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               207,813                 207,813
<PP&E>                                          21,099                  21,099
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,128                 304,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,471,855               1,471,855
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       222,393                 222,393
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,785,219)             (2,785,219)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   304,128                 304,128
<SALES>                                         79,742                 305,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,742                 305,483
<CGS>                                           35,719                 137,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,989                 691,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,855                  84,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (45,831)               (608,417)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       400                   1,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (46,231)               (609,617)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (46,231)               (609,617)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)                   (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)                   (.18)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
 CFO Certification
 
 I, Randy Jones, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Kaire holdings, Incorporated. (the "Company");
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 20, 2004
 
 /s/ Randy Jones
 Randy Jones
 Chief Financial Officer/Consultant
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7728

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROY STEVE DAVIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-89-407-A, CA-97-448-AM) Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 14, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roy Steve Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Louis Cardani, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Appellant’s “Motion forConsideration” of his informal brief, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Davis , Nos. CR-89-407-A; CA-97-448-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 9 and Sept. 17, 1997). Because the claims were not presented in the district court, we deny Appellant’s motion to supplement the record. We deny Appellant’s motions for appointmentof counsel and for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED