27570 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 10, 2009 / Notices 

calendar quarter. All reports are due no 

later than 30 days after the end of the 

fiscal quarter. Program reports shall be 

submitted to the appropriate OSHA 

Regional Office. Financial reports shall 

be submitted via the DOL E–Grants 

system. The Grantee(s) shall submit 

financial reports on a quarterly basis. 

The first reporting period shall end on 

the last day of the fiscal quarter 

(December 31, March 31, June 30, or 

September 30) during which the grant 

was signed. Financial reports are due 

within 30 days of the end of the 

reporting period (i.e., by January 30, 

April 30, July 30, and October 30). 

The Grantee(s) shall use Standard 

Form (SF) 269, Financial Status Report, 

to report the status of funds, at the 

project level, during the grant period. A 

final SF269 shall be submitted no later 

than 90 days following completion of 

the grant period. The SF269 reports will 

be submitted electronically through the 

Department of Labor (DOL) E–Grants 

system. It is expected that the Federal 

Financial Report (FFR) will replace the 

SF269 by October 1, 2009, as mandated 

by the Office of Management and 

Budget. When available, the FFR will 

replace the SF269 in DOL E–Grants. The 

quarterly and final reporting 

requirements will not change. 

Technical Progress Reports: After 

signing the agreement, the Grantee(s) 

shall submit technical progress reports 

to USDOL/OSHA Regional Offices at the 

end of each fiscal quarter. Technical 

progress reports provide both 

quantitative and qualitative information 

and a narrative assessment of 

performance for the preceding threemonth period. OSHA Form 171 shall be 

used for reporting training numbers. In 

addition, a narrative report shall be 

provided that details grant activities 

conducted during the quarter, provides 

an assessment of how the project is 

progressing in achieving its stated 

objectives, and notes any problems or 

delays along with corrective actions 

proposed. The first reporting period 

shall end on the last day of the fiscal 

quarter (December 31, March 31, June 

30, or September 30) during which the 

grant was signed. Quarterly progress 

reports are due within 30 days of the 

end of the report period (i.e., by January 

30, April 30, July 30, and October 30.) 

Between reporting dates, the Grantees(s) 

shall also immediately inform USDOL/ 

OSHA of significant developments and/ 

or problems affecting the organization’s 

ability to accomplish planned grant 

activities. 

Authority: The Occupational Safety and 

Health Act of 1970, (29 U.S.C. 670), Public 

Law 111–8, and the Omnibus Appropriations 

Act, 2009. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of 

June, 2009. 

Jordan Barab, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for 

Occupational Safety and Health. 

Application Document Checklist 

Application for Federal Assistance (SF 

424 form) 

Budget Information (SF 424A form) 

Assurances (SF 424B form) 

Combined Assurances for (ED 80–0013 

form) 

Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity 

for Applicants (Faith-Based EEO 

Survey), (OMB No. 1890–0014 form) 

Attachments (Please attach in the 

following order): 

Program Summary (not to exceed two 

single-sided pages) 

Detailed Project Budget Backup 

If applicable: provide a copy of 

approved indirect cost rate agreement, 

statement of program income, and a 

description of any voluntary non-federal 

resource contribution to be provided by 

the applicant, including source of funds 

and estimated amount. 

Technical Proposal, program 

narrative, not to exceed 30 single-sided 

pages, double-spaced, 12-point font, 

containing: Problem Statement/Need for 

Funds; Administrative and Program 

Capability; and Work plan. 

Organizational Chart Evidence of 

Nonprofit status, (letter from the IRS), if 

applicable Accounting System 

Certification, if applicable; Other 

Attachments such as: Resumes of key 

personnel or position descriptions, 

exhibits, information on prior 

government grants, and signed letters of 

commitment to the project. 

Note: In the Grants.gov system, there is a 

window containing a menu of ‘‘Mandatory 

Documents’’ which must be completed and 

submitted online within the system. For all 

other attachments such as the Program 

Summary, Detailed Budget Backup, 

Technical Proposal, etc., please scan these 

documents into a single Adobe Acrobat file 

and attach the document in the area for 

attachments. 

[FR Doc. E9–13516 Filed 6–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE 

ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES 

National Endowment for the Arts; 

National Council on the Arts 167th 

Meeting 

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 

L. 92–463), as amended, notice is hereby 

given that a meeting of the National 

Council on the Arts will be held on June 

25–26, 2009 in Rooms 527 and M–09 at 

the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20506. 

A portion of this meeting, from 2 

p.m.–5 p.m. on June 25th, will be closed 

for National Medal of Arts review and 

recommendations. The remainder of the 

meeting, from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. on June 

26th (ending time is approximate), will 

be open to the public on a space 

available basis. After opening remarks 

and announcements, there will be a 

presentation by 2009 Poetry Out Loud 

national champion Will Farley. This 

will be followed by Congressional/ 

White House updates. There also will be 

presentations from the Baltimore 

Museum of Art (the Cone Collection) 

and the Meserve-Kunhardt Foundation 

(Gordon Parks photographs) as well as 

a performance/presentation by 

Signature Theatre. The Council will 

then review and vote on applications 

and guidelines, and the meeting will 

conclude with a general discussion. 

The closed portions of meetings are 

for the purpose of review, discussion, 

evaluation, and recommendations on 

awards under the National Foundation 

on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 

1965, as amended, including 

information given in confidence to the 

agency. In accordance with the 

determination of the Chairman of 

February 28, 2008, these sessions will 

be closed to the public pursuant to 

subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 

5, United States Code. 

If, in the course of the open session 

discussion, it becomes necessary for the 

Council to discuss non-public 

commercial or financial information of 

intrinsic value, the Council will go into 

closed session pursuant to subsection 

(c)(4) of the Government in the 

Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b. 

Additionally, discussion concerning 

purely personal information about 

individuals, submitted with grant 

applications, such as personal 

biographical and salary data or medical 

information, may be conducted by the 

Council in closed session in accordance 

with subsection (c)(6) of 5 U.S.C. 552b. 

Any interested persons may attend, as 

observers, Council discussions and 

reviews that are open to the public. If 

you need special accommodations due 

to a disability, please contact the Office 

of AccessAbility, National Endowment 

for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682– 

5532, TTY–TDD 202/682–5429, at least 

seven (7) days prior to the meeting. 

Further information with reference to 

this meeting can be obtained from the 

Office of Communications, National 


erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 10, 2009 / Notices 27571 

Endowment for the Arts, Washington, 

DC 20506, at 202/682–5570. 

Dated: June 4, 2009. 

Kathy Plowitz-Worden, 

Panel Coordinator, Office of Guidelines and 

Panel Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–13512 Filed 6–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7537–01–P 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

Proposal Review; Notice of Meetings 

In accordance with the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– 

463, as amended), the National Science 

Foundation (NSF) announces its intent 

to hold proposal review meetings 

throughout the year. The purpose of 

these meetings is to provide advice and 

recommendations concerning proposals 

submitted to the NSF for financial 

support. The agenda for each of these 

meetings is to review and evaluate 

proposals as part of the selection 

process for awards. The review and 

evaluation may also include assessment 

of the progress of awarded proposals. 

The majority of these meetings will take 

place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 

Arlington, Virginia 22230. 

These meetings will be closed to the 

public. The proposals being reviewed 

include information of a proprietary or 

confidential nature, including technical 

information; financial data, such as 

salaries; and personal information 

concerning individuals associated with 

the proposals. These matters are exempt 

under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 

Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF 

will continue to review the agenda and 

merits of each meeting for overall 

compliance of the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act. 

These closed proposal review 

meetings will not be announced on an 

individual basis in the Federal Register. 

NSF intends to publish a notice similar 

to this on a quarterly basis. For an 

advance listing of the closed proposal 

review meetings that include the names 

of the proposal review panel and the 

time, date, place, and any information 

on changes, corrections, or 

cancellations, please visit the NSF Web 

site: http://www.nsf.gov/events/ 

advisory.jsp. This information may also 

be requested by telephoning 703/292– 

8180. 

Dated: June 5, 2009. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. E9–13560 Filed 6–9–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[ DOCKET NO. 72–25; NRC–2009–0076] 

Department of Energy, Idaho 

Operations Office, Idaho Spent Fuel 

Facility; Issuance of Environmental 

Assessment and Finding of No 

Significant Impact Regarding the 

Proposed Exemption From Certain 

Regulatory Requirements of 10 CFR 

Part 20 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Issuance of an Environmental 

Assessment and Finding of No 

Significant Impact. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shana Helton, Senior Project Manager, 

Licensing Branch, Division of Spent 

Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office 

of Nuclear Material Safety and 

Safeguards (NMSS), U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission (NRC), 

Rockville, MD 20852. Telephone: (301) 

492–3284; fax number: (301) 492–3348; 

e-mail: shana.helton@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to 10 CFR 20.2301, the U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission (NRC) is 

considering issuance of an exemption to 

the United States Department of Energy, 

Idaho Operations Office (DOE or 

applicant), from the requirements of 10 

CFR 20.1501(c). Section 20.1501(c) 

requires that dosimeter processors hold 

current personnel dosimetry 

accreditation from the National 

Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation 

Program (NVLAP) of the National 

Institute of Standards and Technology. 

Exemption from this requirement of 10 

CFR 20.1501(c) would allow DOE to use 

the DOE Laboratory Accreditation 

Program (DOELAP) process for 

personnel dosimetry at Idaho Spent 

Fuel (ISF) facility independent spent 

fuel storage installation (ISFSI), located 

at the Idaho National Engineering and 

Environmental Laboratory in Butte 

County, Idaho. 

Pursuant to 10 CFR part 72, DOE 

submitted an application, including a 

Safety Analysis Report (SAR), by letter 

dated May 30, 2008, as supplemented, 

seeking NRC approval of the direct 

transfer of Special Nuclear Materials 

License No. 2512 (SNM–2512) for the 

ISF facility, currently held by Foster 

Wheeler Environmental Corporation 

(FWENC). The applicant is also seeking 

NRC approval of a conforming license 

amendment, which would reflect the 

proposed transfer. NRC staff is currently 

performing a review of the requested 

license transfer and conforming 

amendment. 

Environmental Assessment (EA) 

Identification of Proposed Action: As 

part of its request for a transfer of SNM– 

2512, DOE, on June 9, 2008, requested 

an exemption from the requirements of 

10 CFR 20.1501(c)(1), which states in 

part that ‘‘All personnel dosimeters 

* * * that require processing * * * 

must be processed and evaluated by a 

dosimetry processor * * * (1) Holding 

current personnel dosimetry 

accreditation from the National 

Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation 

Program (NVLAP) of the National 

Institute of Standards and Technology.’’ 

Specifically, the applicant proposes 

allowing the DOELAP as an approved 

alternative. The NRC’s authority to grant 

an exemption to its 10 CFR Part 20 

radiation protection requirements is set 

forth in 10 CFR 20.2301. 

Need for the Proposed Action: The 

applicant will receive control of SNM– 

2512 from FWENC, as described in its 

application and SAR, subject to 

approval of the pending license transfer 

application. The applicant is 

implementing programs and procedures 

necessary to operate the as-yet-to-beconstructed ISFSI and seeks to have 

those programs make efficient use of 

resources. One of the programs 

developed by DOE is the capability to 

monitor personnel occupational 

radioactive dose for routine and nonroutine activities at the ISF facility. 

Personnel dosimetry requires processing 

by a qualified processing facility. DOE’s 

preferred processing organization, 

which is accredited by DOELAP, 

currently processes dosimetry for the 

Fort St. Vrain ISFSI (docket no. 72–9) 

and the Three Mile Island ISFSI (docket 

no. 72–20), also under license to DOE. 

According to DOE’s exemption request, 

DOELAP is deemed equivalent to 

NVLAP accreditation for the purpose of 

demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 

20.1501(c). Use of the NVLAP process at 

the ISF facility would place a burden 

upon DOE without any attendant health 

or safety benefit. 

Environmental Impacts of the 

Proposed Action: The staff has 

examined both the NVLAP and 

DOELAP processing and standards. 

Both the NVLAP and DOELAP have 

similar requirements in that they 

incorporate similar test categories (type 

of radiation and energy levels), 

tolerance levels, bias, and performance 

criteria. The NRC staff concludes that 

the DOELAP process is an acceptable 

alternative to the NVLAP process 

required by 10 CFR 20.1501(c) for the 

ISF facility. 


erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES