alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1999             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                    2,045,003                 592,547
<SECURITIES>                                      0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                58,772                 344,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          2,103,775                 937,415
<PP&E>                                    3,846,859               3,824,721
<DEPRECIATION>                           (1,410,406)             (1,027,307)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            4,540,228               3,734,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       159,757                  87,943
<BONDS>                                           0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                       0                       0
<COMMON>                                    143,600                 143,600
<OTHER-SE>                                3,975,221               3,237,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              4,540,228               3,734,829
<SALES>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          3,262,953               2,984,950
<CGS>                                             0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          2,131,971               1,669,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           1,189,355               1,343,450
<INCOME-TAX>                                451,955                 531,960
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         737,400                 811,490
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0                       0
<CHANGES>                                         0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                737,400                 811,490
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .05                     .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .05                     .06



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  this
Consolidated  Statement of Financial Condition at March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) and
the  Consolidated  Statement  of Income for the Six Months  Ended March 31, 2000
(Unaudited)  and is qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               25,317
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5,808,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                        282,341
<INVENTORY>                                       2,514,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8,795,367
<PP&E>                                            1,317,186
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,043,030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    9,356,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,610,562
<BONDS>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                              1,704
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      9,356,305
<SALES>                                           8,527,573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  8,527,573
<CGS>                                             5,936,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8,479,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  129,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      48,061
<INCOME-TAX>                                         20,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  28,061
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         28,061
<EPS-BASIC>                                             .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .01


</TABLE>
#### In Re: Howell W. WOLTZ, Petitioner.

No. 08-2307.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 2009.

Decided: May 26, 2009.

*233Howell W. Woltz, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Howell W. Woltz petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order removing the district court judge from his case due to alleged bias. We conclude that Woltz is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *In re Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Woltz fails to demonstrate a clear right to the relief sought. Accordingly, we deny Woltz’s motion to proceed in forma pau-peris and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 858
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         2300
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                            842
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      4298
<PP&E>                                                 835
<DEPRECIATION>                                         206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        5904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 6939
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               111
<OTHER-SE>                                          (1308)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          5904
<SALES>                                               2752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      3044
<CGS>                                                 2413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         4700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (4154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (4154)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund V, L.P., (the Partnership) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 10, 2008                                                                   
|                                                                                       
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                                                                       
|Dean L. Cash                                                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and
will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
May 8, 2020

Memorandum

To: All Regional Directors

Attention: Regional Fire Management Officers

From: Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs

Subject: BIA Wildland Fire COVID-19 Screening, Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

Purpose: Implementation of procedures and protocols for screening of wildland fire personnel at 

duty stations and during incident management activities. These procedures and protocols 

addressed within this memo and supporting attachments, set a minimum standard to be followed 

regarding COVID-19 screening. More stringent standards may be in place for Tribal employees, 

based on Tribal standards.

Scope: This guidance applies to all Bureau of Indian Affairs, Branch of Wildland Fire 

Management (BIA) employees, Administratively Determined (AD) personnel, and Tribal 

wildland fire programs (638 contracted, self-governance, and cooperative agreement).

Guidance: As outlined in the attached Fire Management Board memorandum (No. 20-006a), 

supervisors will work to ensure the attached instructions for screening guidance is implemented 

and maintained at duty stations and for all incident management activities, as frequently and 

extensively as possible.

The Wildland Fire COVID-19 Screening Tool (attached), will be utilized for prescreening 

purposes. Instructions for implementation are outlined within the Screening Tool.

During mobilization of AD personnel, the Screening Tool will be utilized during initial 

communication. When possible, this tool should be utilized via phone call, to reduce the 

potential exposure to and spread of COVID-19.

Questions regarding implementation of this memorandum should be directed to BIA Branch of 

Wildland Fire Safety Program Manager, Adrian Grayshield, at adrian.grayshield@bia.gov.

Attachments:

1. FMB Memorandum No. 20-006: Establishment of Wildland Fire COVID-19 Screening 

Interim Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

2. FMB Memorandum 20-006a Interim Standard Operating Procedures and Wildland Fire 

COVID-19 Screening Tool

United States Department of the Interior

BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS

Washington, DC 20240
#### Walter Duane WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joyce FRANCIS, Warden; Valorie Rap-pold, A.W. Operations; Matt Arnold, Captain; Sliger, Lt. Security; Deborah Livingston, Disciplinary Hearing Officer (D.H.O.); Wilson, Assistant Food Service Administrator; Mrs. Veltyry, A-Unit Manager (Coordinator Job Assignments); Mark Dib, Lt., Physicians Assistant; Mrs. Frye, Food Service Correctional Officer; Mrs. Hilton, Food Service Correctional Officer; Robert Spears, Defendants-Ap-pellees, and United States of America; Department of Justice; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Federal Correctional Institution, Gil-mer, Defendants.

No. 08-7516.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 22, 2009.

Decided: May 18, 2009.

Walter Duane White, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Walter Duane White appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny White’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *White v. Francis,*No. 1:07-cv-00032-IMK-JSK, 2008 WL 2705102 (N.D.W.Va. July 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Order filed December 14, 2021 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00593-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF G.D.P., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-03419

O R D E R

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The court reporter informed 

this court that appellant has requested the reporter’s record be prepared. On 

November 19, 2021, the clerk of this court notified appellant that we would consider 

and decide those issues that do not require a reporter’s record unless appellant, 

within 15 days of notice, requested and paid or made arrangements to pay the court 

reporter for preparing the record and provided proof of same. See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply. 
2

Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within thirty days 

of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court will 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2607 

To amend the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies 

Appropriations Act, 2010 to repeal a provision of that Act relating 

to geothermal energy receipts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Department of the Interior, Environment, 

and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 to repeal 

a provision of that Act relating to geothermal energy 

receipts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY RECEIPTS 

4 PROVISION. 

5 Section 423 of the Department of the Interior, Envi6 ronment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 

7 is repealed. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Kenneth Bazil, Appellant, v Luis Marshall, Respondent.

Decided March 29, 2011

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,772,397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               36,135,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                   678,465
<INVENTORY>                                 20,254,378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            61,499,079
<PP&E>                                     197,775,355
<DEPRECIATION>                              99,936,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             171,749,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,426,048
<BONDS>                                     59,956,433
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,534,641
<OTHER-SE>                                  73,784,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               171,749,571
<SALES>                                     60,465,735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            60,465,735
<CGS>                                       45,378,424
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,378,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               300,691
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,211,831
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,345,399
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,380,992
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,964,407
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,964,407
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of FC Banc Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period
ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Christman, President & Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John R. Christman



John R. Christman

President & Principal Executive Officer

February 21, 2003
#### Ruth Ann (Darnell) WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. McLAIN TRUCKING, Inc., and Clyde E. Rupert, Defendants.

Civil Action No. 5927.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, W. D.

Dec. 24, 1948.

Myers & Myers and Robert D. Touvelle, all of Celina, Ohio, for plaintiff.

*480Effler, Eastman, Stichter & Smith, of Toledo, Ohio, and Marchal & Marchal, of Greenville, Ohio, for defendants.

For opinion, see Stauffer v. McLain Trucking, Inc., 8 F.R.D. 478.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHS
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended February 29, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John D. Johnson, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | /s/ JOHN D. JOHNSON                      
| |                                          
| | John D. Johnson                          
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer

April 7, 2004