alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Indian Gaming Commission

Public Meeting Agenda 

Open to the Public 

Date: Thursday, July 18, 2013 

Time: 11:00 am – 12:00 pm 

Location: Tulalip Casino Resort, 10200 Quil Ceda Blvd., Tulalip, WA 

Room: Chinook III and IV 

Agenda items may be taken out of sequence at the discretion of the Chair

1) Call to Order/Commission Opening Remarks 

2) Chief of Staff Report 

a. Training & Technical Assistance 

i. 2013 YTD Training Statistics 

ii. New Regulation Training and Technical Training Opportunities 

b. Agency Operations Review 

i. Strategic Plan Update 

ii. Office Move 

iii. Policies & Procedures 

iv. Records Management 

c. Final Fee Rate 

d. 2012 Compliance Report Published 

e. Other business 

i. Staffing 

ii. Top 12 Best Very Small Agencies 

3) General Counsel Report 

a. Regulatory Review 

i. Final Rules Published in Federal Register and Effective Dates 

ii. Notices of Proposed Rule Making (Technical Amendments) 

b. Consultation Policy Update 

4) New Business 

a. Agency Policies and Procedures up for Consideration 

b. Strategic Plan Adoption 

5) Public Comment (sign-in required)

6) Announcements and Adjournment 

a. Upcoming Training Events 

b. Upcoming Meetings 

1
2

Please turn off cell phones during meeting sessions 

In accordance with 25 U.S.C. 2704 (f), the National Indian Gaming Commission meets at least once every four months as a body. 

Upon advance request, the Commission will pursue reasonable accommodations to enable persons with disabilities to attend 

Commission meetings. Questions or comments pertaining to the agenda and requests for special accommodations should be directed 

to: Rita Homa at (202) 418-9807. 

To promote efficiency and as an accommodation to all parties involved, the agenda may be modified and items taken out of order.

Additionally, the public meeting may end early once all agenda items are completed. In keeping with the President’s Memorandum on 

Transparency and Open Government, this agenda and the recorded transcript of these proceedings will be available online for review at 

www.nigc.gov. 

Persons wishing to make a statement at a Commission meeting may sign a sheet at the entrance to the meeting room and will appear 

during the final agenda item titled “Public Comment”. This segment is intended for an individual to make a brief statement to the 

Commissioners supported by fact, on current issues, which are within the jurisdiction of the NIGC. It is not intended to be an open 

forum for debate. However the Commission may choose to address any issues or comments that are raised.
AL
«son 'No,

a Y
5 é
a)
% N we
S comN

May 23, 2013

Kevin Lyon, Director

Squaxin Island Tribe Legal Department
10 S.E. Squaxin Lane

Shelton, WA 98584

Re: Review of loan documents for the Squaxin Island Tribe
Dear Mr, Lyon:

This letter responds to the request on behalf of the Squaxin Island Tribe (Tribe)
for the National Indian Gaming Commission's Office of General Counsel to review
certain financing agreements with Bank of America, N.A.. Specifically, the Tribe has
asked for an opinion whether these agreements are management contracts requiring the
NIGC Chairwoman’s approval under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. The Tribe has
also asked for an opinion whether the agreements violate IGRA’s requirement that a tribe
have the sole proprietary interest in its gaming operation,

In my review, [ considered the following submissions (collectively, “the Loan
Documents”) all unexecuted, but represented to be tn substantially final form

° Amended and restated foan agreement, marked at bottom eft corner as
“SMRH:20078 | 233.8.°,

° Amended and restated security agrcement, marked at bottom left corner as
“SMREI:200783280.9",

° Irrevocable direct draw letter of credit, marked at bottom left commer as
“SMRH:2007991 76.3". and

° Irrevocable direct draw letter of credit, marked at bottom left corner as,

“SMRH:200799 [89 3.7

The Loan Documents contain terms similar to other agreements the Olfice of
General Counsel has already reviewed and analyzed. See
www.nige.gov/Reading Room’Management_ Review Letters.aspx. Applying the same
analysis here, it is my opinion that collectively the Loan Documents are not management
contracts and do not require the approval of the Chatrwoman, It is also my opinion that
they do not violate IGRA’s sole proprietary interest requirement.

It is my understanding that the Loan Documents are represented to be in
substantially final form with respect to terms affecting this opinion, and if such terms
change in any material way prior to closing or are inconsistent with assumptions made
herein, this opinion shali not apply. Further, this opinion is limited to the Loan

NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1447 L St. NW, Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 WWW.NIGC.GoV

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK


Kevin Lyon

Re: Review of Loan documents for the Squaxin [sland Tribe
May 23, 2013

Page 2 of 2

Documents listed above. This opinion does not include or extend to any other agreements
or documents not submitted for review.

I anticipate that this letter will be posted to the NIGC’s website. Prior to posting,
NIGC will notify you and give you an opportunity to identify and request that
information subject to the exemptions under FOIA be redacted or withheld. A list of the
FOIA exemptions may be found at 25 U.S.C. § 552(b).

If you have any questions, please contact NIGC Staff Attorney Esther Dittler at
(202) 420-9229.

Sincerely,

Aon Shyloski
Acting General Counsel
Via email and U.S. Mail

December 12, 2013

Clifton Molatore, P.C.
Miller Nash LLP

3400 U.S. Bancorp Tower
111 S.W. Fifth Avenue
Portland, OR 97204

Re: Review of financing documents for the Kalispel Tribe of Indians
Dear Mr. Molatore:

This letter responds to the Kalispel Tribe of Indians’ request for the National Indian
Gaming Commission’s Office of General Counsel to review several agreements
pertaining to the issuance of taxable bonds related to the Tribe’s gaming enterprise. The
Tribe has asked for an opinion whether these agreements are management contracts
requiring the NIGC Chair’s approval under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA).
25 U.S.C. §§ 271 1(a) and 2710(d)(9). The Tribe also has asked for an opinion whether
the agreements violate IGRA’s requirement that a tribe have the sole proprietary interest
in its gaming operation. 25 U.S.C. § 2710(b)(2)(A).

In my review, | considered the following submissions (collectively, “the Financing
Documents”) all unexecuted, but represented to be in substantially final form:

e Purchase Agreement, OHS Draft-Distributed 11/5/2013, OHSUSA 754726087.3;

e Amended and Restated Indenture of Trust, K& L Gates LLP-Draft dated
11/25/2013;

e Amended and Restated Priority Distribution Agreement, K& L Gates LLP- Draft
dated 11/25/2013;

e Offering Memorandum, OHS Draft- Distributed 12/3/2013.

NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS

7003 Fax 202.632.7066 Www.NiGc.cov

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK


Mr. Clifton Molatore, P.C.
December 12, 2013
Page 2

The Financing Documents contain terms similar to other agreements the Office of
General Counsel has already reviewed and analyzed. See www.nigc.gov/Reading_Room/
Management_Review_Letters.aspx. Applying the same analysis here, it is my opinion
that the Financing Documents are not management contracts and do not require the
approval of the Chair. It is also my opinion that they do not violate IGRA’s sole
proprietary interest requirement.

I understand that the Financing Documents are in substantially final form with respect to
terms affecting this opinion. If such terms change in any material way or are inconsistent
with assumptions made herein, this opinion shall not apply. Further, this opinion is
limited to the Financing Documents listed above. This opinion does not include or extend
to any other agreements.

I anticipate this letter will be posted to the NIGC’s website. Prior to posting, NIGC FOIA
Office will notify you and give you an opportunity to identify and request that
information subject to the exemptions under FOIA be redacted or withheld. A list of the
FOIA exemptions may be found at 5 U.S.C. § 552(b).

If you have any questions, please contact NIGC Staff Attorney Miles Janssen at (202)
632-7003.

Sincerely, ym?
Cric nro!

Eric Shepard
Acting General Counsel
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50827 Summary Calendar

SERGIO HIRAM ALVIDREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KENNETH W. WILLIAMS ET AL., Defendants, DAYTON J. POPPELL, Warden; ADOLPH THOMAS JR.; REFUGIO SAMARRON; MAURICE NEWCOMB, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-96-CV-1089

-------------------- July 19, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Sergio Hiram Alvidrez, Texas prisoner no. 512255, appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Dayton J. Poppell, Warden of the Connally Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division (TDCJ-ID), and Connally Unit employees, Adolph Thomas, Jr., Refugio Samarron, and MauriceNo. 98-50827 -2- Newcomb. Having reviewed the arguments and the record on appeal,

we find that Alvidrez failed to present evidence showing that a genuine issue of material fact exists that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to a substantial risk of serious harm. See Newton v. Black , 133 F.3d 301, 308 (5th Cir. 1998); Newell v. Oxford Management, Inc. , 912 F.2d 793, 795 (5th Cir. 1990); Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                      Subsidiaries of COMFORCE Corporation

      The following is a complete list of all of the subsidiaries of COMFORCE
Corporation.

      1.    COMFORCE Operating, Inc.
      2.    COMFORCE Technical Services, Inc.
      3.    COMFORCE Information Technologies, Inc.
      4.    COMFORCE Telecom, Inc.
      5.    Project Staffing Support Team, Inc.
      6.    RHO Acquisition Company
      7.    RHO Company Incorporated
      8.    COMFORCE IT Acquisition Corp., Inc.
      9.    Force Five, Inc.
      10.   SUMTEC Corporation
      11.   Uniforce Services, Inc.
      12.   PrO Unlimited, Inc.
      13.   E.O. Operations Corp.
      14.   E.O. Servicing Co., Inc.
      15.   Uniforce Staffing Services, Inc.
      16.   PrO N.E., Inc.
      17.   USSI-N.E. Corp.
      18.   Uniforce Information Services, Inc.
      19.   Uniforce Payrolling Services, Inc.
      20.   USI Inc. of California
      21.   UTS Corp. of Minnesota
      22.   UTS of Delaware, Inc.
      23.   LabForce of America, Inc.
      24.   Uniforce MIS Services of Georgia, Inc.
            d/b/a Brannon & Tully, Inc.
      25.   Uniforce Medical Office Support, Inc.
      26.   Uniforce Information Services of Texas, Inc.
      27.   Temporary Help Industry Servicing Co., Inc.
      28.   Montare International, Inc.
      29.   Brannon & Tully, Inc.
      30.   Staffing Industry Funding & Support, Inc.
      31.   Professional Staffing Funding & Support, Inc.
      32.   Brentwood Service Group, Inc.
      33.   Tempfunds International, Inc.
      34.   Computer Consultants Funding & Support, Inc.
      35.   Thisco of Canada, Inc.
      36.   Camelot Consulting Group, Inc.
      37.   Camelot Communications Group, Inc.
      38.   Camelot Control Group, Inc.
      39.   Camelot Group, Inc.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHS
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A-2 for the
quarterly period ended February 28, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John D. Johnson, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | /s/ JOHN D. JOHNSON                      
| |                                          
| | John D. Johnson                          
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer

March 2, 2004
Document

EXHIBIT 4.1



DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


The following statements with respect to the capital stock of Automatic Data Processing, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) are subject to the detailed provisions of the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”), dated November 10, 1998. These statements do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the terms of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and the Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company, each of which is incorporated by reference into this Exhibit 4.1.


The authorized capital of the Company consists of 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.10 per share (the “Common Stock”), and 300,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share (the “Preferred Stock”). At July 31, 2022, no shares of Preferred Stock and 415,516,984 shares of Common Stock (exclusive of 223,195,458 treasury shares) were issued and outstanding. The outstanding shares of Common Stock are fully paid and nonassessable.


Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share held and have the sole right to vote for the election of directors and on all matters requiring stockholder action. Holders of Common Stock have no cumulative voting rights. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends out of any funds of the Company lawfully available therefor under the laws of the State of Delaware if, when and as declared by the Board of Directors in its discretion, and are also entitled upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company to share ratably in the assets of the Company legally available for distribution to stockholders, subject in each event to the rights of the holders of any Preferred Stock which may be outstanding at the time. Holders of the Common Stock have no preemptive rights. Under the laws of the State of Delaware, shares of the Company’s Common Stock may be, in effect, redeemed through mergers or similar transactions by which such shares are converted into cash, debt securities or other property.
97-208.

#### State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 95APD12-1622. On motion to strike appellant’s brief and supplement and for sanctions. Motion to strike denied and motion for sanctions denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs except that she would strike the report by Dr. Kang.

Moyer, C.J., would grant the motion to strike and deny the motion for sanctions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MYWEB INC.COM FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         717,497
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  456,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,453,398
<PP&E>                                          74,553
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,506,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,392,655
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,954
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,506,185
<SALES>                                        406,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               444,409
<CGS>                                          395,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  700,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (255,885)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (255,885)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# Reconciliation Worksheet

# Instructions
96-2299.

#### Walsh v. Indus. Powder Coatings, Inc.,

Huron App. No. H-95-073. Reported at 77 Ohio St.3d 1517, 674 N.E.2d 371. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.

Resnick, J., not participating.
​

Exhibit 10.3
​
	[ ]
	VIA EMAIL

	[ ]
	​



​
	

	

	


	 
	Re:
	Retention Bonus



​
Dear [   ]
We are pleased to inform you that, in recognition of your contributions to Y-mAbs Therapeutics A/S (the “Company”), you are being offered the opportunity to receive a retention bonus (the “Retention Bonus”) on the following terms and conditions:
1. Payment of Retention Bonus. Subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth below, you will be eligible to receive a Retention Bonus in the amount equal to 25% of your base, cash, salary on April 26, 2023 (the “Vesting Date”) payable in a lump sum within thirty (30) days following the Vesting Date.
2. Conditions to Payment. To receive the Retention Bonus, all of the following conditions must be satisfied:
(a) You are still employed with the Company through the Vesting Date;
(b) No notice of termination of your employment has been given by either you or the Company for any reason through the Vesting Date; and
(c) Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc.’s Biologics License Application for 131I-omburtamab has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on or before the Vesting Date.
3. Termination of Employment. If you are not employed with the Company through the Vesting Date for any reason, or if notice of termination of your employment with the Company is made by you or the Company for any reason prior to the Vesting Date (or any other condition set forth in paragraph 2 above is not satisfied), your right to payment of the Retention Bonus will be forfeited in its entirety.
4. Tax Withholding. Payment of the Retention Bonus will be subject to applicable tax withholdings.
5. Effect on Other Benefits/No Performance Requirement. You acknowledge that payment of the Retention Bonus is not part of normal or expected compensation for purposes of calculating any severance, resignation, redundancy, end of service payments, bonuses, long-service awards, holiday pay, pension or retirement benefits, matching contributions or similar payments. The Retention Bonus does not replace any other bonus arrangement in place between you and the Company and is not dependent on any specific work performance by you.
6. Assignment. The obligation to pay the Retention Bonus is solely that of the Company. You may not assign your right to receive the Retention Bonus.
7. No Right to Continued Employment. The grant of this Retention Bonus opportunity does not give you any right to continue your employment relationship with the Company, and you shall remain subject to discharge to the same extent as if this opportunity were not granted to you.
8. Governing Law. Any dispute arising under this letter shall be decided by applying the laws of Denmark, without regard to conflicts of law principles.
We hope that this arrangement encourages your continued commitment to the Company. Please acknowledge your agreement to the terms of this letter by countersigning it in the space below and returning it to me. Please retain a copy of the letter.
​
Sincerely,
​
	Y-MABS THERAPEUTICS A/S

	By:
	[ ]
	​

	Name:
	[ ]

	Title:
	[ ]

	​
	​

	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO 

	ON 
	[ ]

	[ ]
	​

	​
	​



​
95-1936.

#### In re Churilla.

IT IS ORDERED by this court, *sua sponte,*effective May 7,1997, that Robert J. Churilla, Attorney Registration No. 0039907, last known address in Bedford, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of October 12, 1995, to wit: failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before November 13,1995.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 107 (Friday, June 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27036-27037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13328]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting; Sunshine Act

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).

DATE AND TIME: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on June 
11, 2009, from 2:30 p.m. until such time as the Board concludes its 
business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 
meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 
advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> May 14, 2009

B. New Business

    <bullet> Disclosure and Accounting Requirements--Final Rule

C. Reports

    <bullet> Young, Beginning, and Small Farmer Mission Performance--
2008 Results

Closed Session*

    <bullet> Office of Secondary Market Oversight Quarterly Report


[[Page 27037]]


    Dated: June 3, 2009.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
*Session Closed--Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9).

[FR Doc. E9-13328 Filed 6-3-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P