alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
97-559.

#### State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch

,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 1 6 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk April 16 , 2021

161976 ( 4 6 )

MARIANNE HUFF and PERSON

CENTERED ADVOCACY SERVICES,

LLC

, Plaintiff s

- Appellant s

, SC: 161976

v COA: 3 49528

Ottawa CC: 18

- 00 5222

- NZ

LYNNE DOYLE

, STACY COLEMAN

- AX

, and JEFFREY L

. BROWN

,

Defendant s

- Appellee s

, and

DOUGLAS VAN ES SEN, COMMUNITY

MENTAL HEALTH OF OTTAWA COUNTY

, and THE LAKESHORE REGIONAL ENTITY

,

Defendan ts

.

_________ ____________________________ ___ /

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellee Doyle to extend the

time for filing he r answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer

submitted on December 16, 2020, is accepted as timely filed

.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 28, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk In the United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 05-60812 Summary Calendar PABLO ROBERTO ORTEGA,

Petitioner,

v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

–––––––––––––––– Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A29 867 825

–––––––––––––––– Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Pablo Roberto Ortega petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying Ortega’s motion to reopen his removal proceedings. He argues that the BIA should have reopened his removal proceedings in order to allow him to pursue relief under § 212(c) and (h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).No. 05-60812 -2- This court lacks jurisdiction to consider Ortega’s argument that the BIA should have reopened his case pursuant to the BIA’s sua sponte authority. See Enriquez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 246, 250 (5th Cir. 2004). Ortega’s

contention that this court has the authority to examine sua sponte whether relief under INA § 212(c) and (h) is available to Ortega lacks merit. Moreover, Ortega has failed to brief any other cognizable issues regarding the BIA’s decision. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft , 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, Ortega’s petition for review of the BIA’s decision is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See 5TH CIR . R. 42.2.
Order entered September 20 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00639
- CV
TORIANO MANDRELL KIRK , Appellant

V. TANITA NASH ATKINS , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 19
- 06824
- B

O RDER By order of September 2, 2021, we directed court reporter Robin Washington, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law No. 2, to file, within ten days, either ( 1) the reporter’s record or (2) written verification no hearings were recorded or appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record

. To date, Ms. Washington has not responded. Accordingly, we ORDER Ms. Washington to file, no later than Se ptember 30, 2021, the record or requested verification. Because this is an accelerated appeal and the record wasfirst due August 2, 2021, we caution Ms. Washington that failure to comply with

this order may result in an order that she not sit as a report er until she complies.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Melissa Jean Bellan, Presiding Judge of County Court at Law No. 2; Ms. Washington; and the parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No . 04

- 22

- 00088

- CR
Juan Manuel GONZALEZ , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 341st Judicial District Court , Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 1989CRA000237D3 Honorable Elma Teresa Salinas Ender , Judge Presiding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvar ez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 27, 2022
DI SMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION This is an appeal from one count of murder

. Appellant was convicted by jury trial on Ju ly
2 4 , 1 989 . The written jud gment states the sentence was imposed on July 25, 1989

. On August 3, 1989, Gonzalez’s counsel filed a notice of appeal , and hi s appeal followed

. This court affirmed his conviction on April 24, 1991 , in case number 04

- 89

- 00401

- CR.
On February 11, 2022, Appellant filed a notice of appeal, pro se, challenging his
conviction. On February 22, 2022, we ordered Appellant to show cause why his appeal should not

1 Beckie Palomo is the current presiding judge of the 341st District Court in Webb County.04

- 22

- 00088

- CR

- 2

- be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 2 To date, this court has not received a response to the order
to show cause. Even if we consider the current notice of appeal as an untimely motion for rehearing from the opinion in 04

- 89

- 00401

- CR, this court’s plenary power from that appeal expired on June 24, 1991. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 19.1; Rodriguez v. State , 28 S.W.3d 25, 26 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.). We now dismiss the purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
Do N ot P ublish

2 A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 107 (Friday, June 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27055-27056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[OMB Control No. 3206-0131]


Revision of Information Collection: Combined Federal Campaign 
Applications

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management intends to submit to the Office of Management and 
Budget a request for clearance to revise information collection 
Combined Federal Campaign Applications OMB Control No. 3206-0131, which 
include OPM Forms 1647 A-E. Combined Federal Campaign Eligibility 
Applications are used to review the eligibility of national, 
international, and local charitable organizations that wish to 
participate in the Combined Federal Campaign. The proposed revisions 
reflect changes in eligibility guidance from the Office of Personnel 
Management and recommendations from a review conducted by the 
Government Accountability Office.
    We estimate 20,000 responses to this information collection 
annually. Each form takes approximately three hours to complete. The 
annual estimated burden is 60,000 hours.
    Comments are particularly invited on: whether this information is 
necessary for the proper performance of functions of the Office of 
Personnel Management, and whether it will have practical utility; 
whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of 
information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and 
methodology; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on those who are to respond, through the 
appropriate use of technological collection techniques or other forms 
of information technology.
    For copies of this information collection, contact Curtis Rumbaugh 
at

[[Page 27056]]

<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#492a3c3b3d203a673b3c242b283c2e2109263924672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d9baacabadb0aaf7abacb4bbb8acbeb199b6a9b4f7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>. Please be sure to include a mailing address 
with your request.

DATES: Comments on this information collection should be received 
within 60 calendar days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--Office of CFC Operations, ATTN: 
CFC Operations Specialist, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E 
Street, NW., Room 5450, Washington, DC 20415.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
[FR Doc. E9-13142 Filed 6-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-46-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.’s 333-61503, 33-61612 and 333-129887) pertaining to the Sport Chalet, Inc. 1992 Incentive Award Plan and the Sport Chalet, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan of our report dated June 18, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Sport Chalet, Inc., appearing in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended March 28, 2010.





/s/ Moss Adams LLP





Los Angeles, California


June 7, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual 
Initiatives Issue Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual 
Initiatives Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, July 9, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual Initiatives 
Issue Committee will be held Thursday, July 9, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern 
time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Marisa Knispel. For more information please contact Ms. Knispel at 
1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech 
Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web 
site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: May 27, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-12764 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

CHAIR’S NOTICE – Chairman E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Visit www.NIGC.gov to learn more about the NIGC 3 For 35 Project— a 

year-long project emphasizing the importance of conversations among 

the tribal gaming regulatory community about workforce preparedness.

Date: November 14, 2022

Re: Visit with Arizona Department of Gaming Leadership

I meet with the Arizona Department of Gaming‘s director Ted Vogt 

and leadership from his statewide regulatory staff. I was 

grateful for the opportunity to continue our past discussions 

and meet at ADOG’s offices.

NIGC‘s interest in other gaming regulatory bodies includes 

knowledge of best practices for minimizing cybersecurity threats 

to regulatory bodies’ continuity of operations, emerging trends 

in new game offerings and integrity assurances for sports 

betting operations, and attention to the role the regulatory 

community can play to promote gaming industry efforts to combat 

human trafficking.

Thank you Director Vogt for the opportunity to meet and share 

our insights.

###
{"agency":"NIGC","generated":"2016-08-05 11:27:56","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"}],"value":"2016"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["NIGC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["7"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["5"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["32"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2016","quarter":"Q3"}
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER

TOM CUNNINGHAM

Tom Cunningham (Seminole Nation) is the Chief Compliance Officer at the 

National Indian Gaming Commission, an independent federal regulatory agency 

established within the Department of the Interior. In this position, Cunningham 

monitors compliance of tribal gaming operations on Indian lands in accordance 

with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and NIGC regulations for the Division of 

Compliance, which encompasses eight Regional Offices and the Audit Program. 

Cunningham, in partnership with the NIGC Chief Information Officer, oversees 

the NIGC’s Cybersecurity Working Group. In addition, Cunningham provides

support in implementing the Commission’s priorities.

Prior to becoming Chief Compliance Officer in November of 2020, Cunningham 

served as the Director since June of 2020 and Assistant Director of Compliance 

since April of 2017. Prior to that, he served as the Region Director of NIGC’s 

Oklahoma City office since 2009 and as Field Investigator for the NIGC’s Tulsa, 

Okla. Office beginning in 2007. In these roles, Cunningham ensured tribal 

compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, by providing training and 

technical assistance. Before joining the NIGC, Cunningham spent thirteen years 

in law enforcement including assignment to the Drug Enforcement Administration, and working joint investigations 

with the Federal Bureau of Investigations and the US Attorney’s Office. Cunningham also served as Seminole Nation 

of Oklahoma Gaming Commission Chairman in 2003.

Cunningham is the recipient of the 2006 Director’s Award for Distinguished Service from the White House’s Office of 

the National Drug Control Policy and the 2017 NIGC Chairman’s Award.

Cunningham received a Bachelor of Science degree from East Central University, Ada, Okla. in 2003 and completed 

course work in the Master’s of Jurisprudence from the University of Tulsa, Okla.

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act created the National Indian Gaming Commission to support tribal self-sufficiency and the integrity of Indian gaming. 

NIGC oversees the efficient regulation of 527 gaming establishments operated by 251 tribes across 29 states.

Updated 12/09/2021

Biography

National Indian Gaming Commission
Page 1 of 1

Consultation Agenda

San Diego Convention Center

Room 28

111 W Harbor Dr.

San Diego, CA 92101

April 12, 2017

10:00 am - 12:30 pm

I. Welcome and Opening prayer/Blessing.

II. Introduction of Commission and brief statements.

III. Introduction of NIGC Staff and Tribal leadership and representatives.

IV. Discuss format for the consultation

o Questions/comments will be taken after each topic presentation.

V. Opening statements/comments for those who cannot stay for the entire consultation.

VI. Housekeeping items

o Scheduled to go from 10:00 am to 12:30 pm – however may end early if all 

topics covered and there is no tribal comments

o Meeting will be transcribed, when speaking please state name/organization and 

designees from your tribal governments – not open to the public or media.

VII. Topic order

1. 25 C.F.R. Part 547 Grandfathered Class II Gaming Systems

VIII. Time period for written comments has not yet been finalized, but will likely end on or 

about July 1, 2017, at least 30 business days after the Northwest area consultation.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-12591 Filed 5-26-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
97-49.

#### State ex rel. Russell v. Dunlap.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


<TABLE>
                                                      Exhibit 21

                                ARMCO INC.
                               SUBSIDIARIES

<CAPTION>
                                                     State/Country of 
           Name                                         Incorporation
           ----                                     ------------------
<S>                                                      <S>
AFSG Holdings, Inc.                                      Delaware

Armco Financial Services Corporation                     Delaware

Armco Financial Services International, Inc.             Ohio

Armco Financial Services International, Ltd.             Delaware

Armco Funding Corporation                                Delaware

Armco Insurance Group Inc.                               Delaware

Armco Limited                                            United Kingdom

Armco Management Corporation                             Delaware

Armco Pacific Financial Services Limited                 Vanuatu

Armco Pacific Limited                                    Singapore

Compass Insurance Company                                Delaware

Douglas Dynamics, L.L.C.                                 Delaware

FSA Services Corp.                                       Delaware

Materials Insurance Company                              Cayman Islands

Northwestern National Insurance Company                  Wisconsin
     of Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Talbico, Inc.                                            New York

</TABLE>
Granite Mountain IHC Tragedy General TPS and Information

**What is a Hotshot Crew?**

An Interagency Hotshot Crew (IHC) is a permanent 20-person firefighting crew that is distinct from a regular firefighting hand crew.  Unlike most regular crews, Hotshot crews are formed early in the fire season and stick together as a unit throughout the season.  They are highly capable firefighters thanks to having more training and experience than regular crews.  Hotshots also carry specialized equipment and intra-crew communication capabilities.

Hotshot crews are led and supervised by a superintendent, and assistant superintendent and three to five squad leaders.  IHC leaders must possess advanced skills in fireline leadership and wildland fire suppression, based on years of training and experience in fighting forest and rangeland wildfires.

Every member of an IHC is in top physical condition and the crews work out daily during their first few weeks to achieve and maintain excellent physical conditioning.  Because of this, Hotshot crews are usually sent into the most rugged areas of a wildfire.  

**What are fire shelters and how do they work?**

A fire shelter is a piece of protective gear carried by every wildland firefighter in the United States.  A fire shelter comprises two main elements:  a tentlike structure made of fiberglass with an aluminum shell bonded to the outer surface of the fiberglass.

Fire shelters are designed to reflect radiant heat from the firefighter who takes cover inside the shelter during a fire entrapment.  The fire shelter also helps retain cooler air for the firefighter to breathe during an entrapment.

Fire shelters were developed in the 1960s and became mandatory pieces of safety equipment in the 1970s.  The device underwent a major redesign and improvement in the late 1990s.  Since their introduction, fire shelters have saved hundreds of lives in wildfire entrapments.

However, fire shelters have limitations.  They cannot withstand extreme and prolonged temperatures present in the worst entrapment situations.   Under conditions with prolonged exposure to extreme temperatures (approximately 1,200 degrees F), the aluminum shielding on fire shelters will delaminate from the fiberglass structure.  Because of this, firefighters are trained to use their shelters as a last resort and in areas with relatively light fuels if at all possible.

**How do thunderstorms affect fire behavior?**

Thunderstorms occurring near wildfires are a safety issue because thunderstorms often trigger strong downdrafts.  These sudden and unpredictable winds can create critical and unexpected shifts in the behavior of a wildfire.

Wildland firefighters are trained to base their suppression efforts on the current and expected behavior of the fire.  When the fire’s behavior changes suddenly and unexpectedly, that can place firefighters in a critical situation.

Fire suppression always carries risks, and those risks are compounded when dynamic conditions challenge firefighters’ abilities to predict fire behavior.