alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

CHAIR’S NOTICE

Visit www.NIGC.gov to learn more about the NIGC 3 For 35 Project— a 

year-long project emphasizing the importance of conversations among 

the tribal gaming regulatory community about workforce preparedness.

June 8, 2022, Presentation to Tribal, Provincial, and State Gaming 

Regulators

I will present to the North American Gaming Regulators Association on 

matters related to technology and the gaming regulatory community. 

Specifically, I anticipate announcing the NIGC’s plans in three areas 

related to this topic.

• I will explain plans for new NIGC managed tools to encourage best 

cyber security practices and awareness among technology partners 

in the sports gaming space.

• I will overview the NIGC’s use of technology to modernize and 

provide greater stability for tribal background and licensing 

programs across Indian gaming as well as to bring the NIGC’s use

of federal investigation tools into compliance. 

• I will update on NIGC collaboration across tribal, federal, 

state, and international jurisdictions to promote real-time 

information sharing, response coordination, and risk assessment 

among cyber security and technology experts in the regulatory 

community.

The North American Gaming Regulators Association will hold its 2022 

annual membership meeting in Portland, Maine. The organization 

attracts tribal, state, and provincial regulators. It has provided an 

active discourse on gaming enforcement and oversight for nearly 40 

years. More information about the international organization is 

available on its website at www.NAGRA.org.
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

CHAIR’S NOTICE

Visit www.NIGC.gov to learn more about the NIGC 3 For 35 Project— a 

year-long project emphasizing the importance of conversations among 

the tribal gaming regulatory community about workforce preparedness.

June 9, 2022, Presentation to Oklahoma State Legal Community

I will present at the Sovereignty Symposium XXXIV in Oklahoma City. It 

is a long-standing and state-wide gathering of the legal community 

around a broad range of issues important to Indian country. The 

Oklahoma Supreme Court and tribal leadership’s roles in the event 

demonstrate important collaboration across tribal communities in 

Oklahoma and the legal community.

This year’s Symposium provides an opportunity to share my views on the 

role of the Agency’s guidance and its regulations in ensuring a 

responsive and predictable Agency approach to meeting the NIGC 

mission. My comments will focus on how the Agency communicates its 

positions and its role in timely topics including the following:

• enforcement approaches related to revenue allocation plans and 

misuse of net gaming revenue;

• legislative history regarding Indian gaming’s use of new 

technology; and,

• permissible tools to structuring an Indian gaming operation, 

including independent operator licenses, management contracts, 

and tribally controlled operations. 

I look forward to participating in this important event in the heart

of Indian country.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                     112,485,699
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              436,869,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                23,314,558
<INVENTORY>                                478,997,710
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,096,520,796
<PP&E>                                   1,640,026,424
<DEPRECIATION>                             724,350,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,466,952,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      821,392,778
<BONDS>                                    456,986,102
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                               1,067,176,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,466,952,648
<SALES>                                  1,518,252,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,550,813,285
<CGS>                                    1,485,322,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            31,105,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               872,578
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,303,315
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             18,831,374
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,895,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         15,936,374
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,936,374
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
June 5, 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

COLLEGE OF THE MAINL AND , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 01047

- CV V.

BRUCE GLOVER , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the trial court’s order denying the “Motion for Summary Judgment” filed by appellant, College of the Mainland (the “College”), signed on November 18, 2013 in favor of appellee, Bruce Glover, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find that the undisputed facts negate the College’s alleged waiver of immunity . We therefore order the judgment of the court below REVERSED and RENDER judgment dismissing
with prejudice Bruce Glover’s claims against the College

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee, Bruce Glover.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Jeffrey R. Cramer,certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Anacomp,Inc. (the “registrant”);

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

----

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: December15, 2004   |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|                     |
| /s/ Jeffrey R.  Cramer   |   |
| Jeffrey R.  Cramer       |
| Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
# Contacts

## Supply Ordering 

Great Basin Cache 3833 South Development Avenue Boise, Idaho 83705-5354 Phone Number: (208) 387-5104

After office hours, there will be a Duty Officer on-call that will respond to emergency requests. 

Fax: (208) 387-5573 

## Staff

## Supplies

-  Great Basin Cache    -  Accountability 
  -  Cache Demobilization 
  -  Cache Vans 
  -  Contacts 
  -  Emergency Hiring 
  -  Forms 
  -  Ordering 
  -  Returns
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Angelica Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 25, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, T. M.
Armstrong, Senior Vice President - Finance & Administration and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.




                                            /s/ T. M. Armstrong
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            T. M. Armstrong
                                            Senior Vice President - Finance &
                                            Administration and Chief Financial
                                            Officer of Angelica Corporation

                                            April 22, 2003



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### In the Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation. Ester Baruch et al., Plaintiffs, v Baxter Healthcare Corporation et al., Defendants. Karl Fersch et al., Respondents, v Amchem Products Inc. et al., Defendants, and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 660]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), *575entered August 22, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 602 to consolidate to the extent of consolidating the cases of Juni, Fersch and Middleton for trial, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Given that all three plaintiffs were exposed to asbestos products for vehicles in their work as mechanics over a substantially overlapping period of 40 years, and each is represented by the same counsel, and each case is trial ready, it cannot be said that the IAS court abused its discretion in ordering the three cases consolidated for trial *(see Malcolm v National Gypsum Co.,*995 F2d 346, 350-352 [2d Cir 1993]). While there are some differences, including that one plaintiff has mesothelioma while the other two have lung cancer, and other differences pointed out by defendant, this does not outweigh the substantial overlap of factual and legal issues, or suggest the prejudice of defendant’s right to a fair trial *(see Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig.,*2011 NY Slip Op 3121Q[U], *5-7 [Sup Ct, NY County 2011]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.19
                                                                   -------------

                                   AMENDMENT

                                     to the

                           EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN
                                OF AMETEK, INC.
                                ---------------

                                Amendment No. 3
                                ---------------

     WHEREAS, there was adopted and made effective as of December 29, 1942, the
Employees' Retirement Plan of AMETEK, Inc. (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety, effective
January 1, 1989; and

     WHEREAS, Section 9.2 of the Plan provides that AMETEK, Inc. ("AMETEK") may
amend the Plan at any time or from time to time; and

     WHEREAS, AMETEK now desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

     FIRST:  A new Appendix XXVIII is hereby added to the Plan, to read in its
     -----                                                                    
entirety as follows:

                                "APPENDIX XXVIII

                     SPECIAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO CERTAIN
                      EMPLOYEES OF THE MICROFOAM DIVISION
                      -----------------------------------

          1.  Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary,
     each Participant who was an Employee in the Company's Microfoam Division
     and who transferred his employment on the closing date of the sale of the
     Microfoam Division to Astro-Valcour, Inc., pursuant to the Asset Purchase
     Agreement dated March 21, 1995, shall be entitled to one hundred percent
     (100%) of his Accrued Annual Pension Account regardless of the number of
     years of Credited Service he completed prior to the sale.

          2.  Defined terms used in this Appendix XXVIII shall have the same
     meaning as the identical defined terms as used in Employees' Retirement
     Plan of AMETEK, Inc."

          SECOND:   The provisions of this Amendment No. 3 shall be effective as
          ------                                                                
of the closing date of the sale to Astro-Valcour, Inc.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AMETEK has caused these presents to be executed,
in its corporate name, by its duly authorized officer, and its corporate seal to
be affixed on this 15th day of May, 1995.


                                 AMETEK, Inc.
 

                                 By: /s/ Robert W. Yannarell
                                    -----------------------------
Attest:


  /s/ Dorothy M. Misetic
 -------------------------------
(Seal)
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OFCEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Warren Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), we, Norman F. Swantonand Timothy A. Larkin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the registrant,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

(1)   The reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

March 6, 2007
|        |   | /s/ Norman F. Swanton                                |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Norman F. Swanton                                    |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|   |   | /s/ Timothy A. Larkin                                |
|   |   | Timothy A. Larkin                                    |
|   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 12.1



RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(in thousands)



|                                                |  |          |   |  |         |   |  |          |   |  |          |   |  |          |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | -------- | - |  | ------- | - |  | -------- | - |  | -------- | - |  | -------- | -
|                                                |  | 2005     |   |  | 2004    |   |  | 2003     |   |  | 2002     |   |  | 2001     |  
|Earnings:                                       |  |          |   |  |         |   |  |          |   |  |          |   |  |          |  
|Pretax income (loss) from continuing operations |  | (108,543 | ) |  | (60,415 | ) |  | (112,059 | ) |  | (163,632 | ) |  | (155,587 | )
|Add fixed charges                               |  | 4,913    |   |  | 4,560   |   |  | 3,068    |   |  | 1,583    |   |  | 2,422    |  
|                                                |  |          |   |  |         |   |  |          |   |  |          |   |  |          |  
|Earnings (as defined)                           |  | (103,630 | ) |  | (55,855 | ) |  | (108,991 | ) |  | (162,049 | ) |  | (153,165 | )
|                                                |  |          |   |  |        
|Fixed Charges:                                  |  |          |   |  |         |   |  |          |   |  |          |   |  |          |  
|Interest expense                                |  | 3,226    |   |  | 3,209   |   |  | 2,038    |   |  | 112      |   |  | 577      |  
|Estimate of interest within rental expense      |  | 1,687    |   |  | 1,351   |   |  | 1,030    |   |  | 1,471    |   |  | 1,845    |  
|                                                |  |          |   |  |         |   |  |          |   |  |          |   |  |          |  
|Total fixed charges                             |  | 4,913    |   |  | 4,560   |   |  | 3,068    |   |  | 1,583    |   |  | 2,422    |  
|                                                |  |          |   |  |        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges              |  | (21.09   | ) |  | (12.25  | ) |  | (35.53   | ) |  | (102.37  | ) |  | (63.24   | )
|                                                |  |          |   |  |        
|Deficiency                                      |  | (108,543 | ) |  | (60,415 | ) |  | (112,059 | ) |  | (163,632 | ) |  | (155,587 | )
#### SWINDELLS et al. v. ZIFF-DAVIS PUBLISHING CO. SWINDELLS et al. v. ESQUIRE, Inc.

Civ. A. Nos. 13940, 13899.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

April 19, 1954.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, for defendant, by Albert Rosenblum, New York City, for the motion.

Marcus & Schenkman, New York City, for plaintiffs, by Harold H. Goldberg, New York City, in opposition.

RAYFIEL, District Judge.

The defendant in each of the above-entitled actions moves for an order striking plaintiffs’ demand for a jury trial and striking the case from the jury calendar of this Court on the ground that the demand therefor was not made within the period pi’ovided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

Each of the actions was commenced in the New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, and was thereafter' transferred to this Court, in which issue was joined by the service of the defendant’s answer, in the Esquire, Inc., case on October 21, 1953, and in the Ziff-Davis Publishing Co. case on November 13, 1953.

*389On March 17, 1954, more than four months after the joinder of issue, plaintiffs’ attorneys caused to be served upon the attorneys for the defendants notes of issue in both cases for the April, 1954, term of this Court, together with a demand for a trial by jury in each case.

Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a demand for a trial by jury be served within ten days after the last responsive pleading; hence, the demand herein was not made in accordance with the Rule. The plaintiffs concede that fact but contend that their failure to make proper and timely demand was occasioned by their inadvertence and unfamiliarity with the applicable federal rule, and may and should be excused under the discretionary power granted to the Court under Rule 39 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. They offer no other reason for invoking the Court’s discretion.

I consider that reason entirely inadequate, particularly so since the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been in use since 1938. See Castro v. Cufari, D.C., 14 F.R.D. 150.

Accordingly, the defendants’ motion is in all respects granted.

Settle order on notice.
Summary of 2008 Executive Officer Cash Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.44 
 SUMMARY OF 2008 EXECUTIVE OFFICER CASH BONUS PLAN 
 Overview and Purpose 
 This plan (the “2008 Bonus Plan”) was adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) of Kosan
Biosciences Incorporated (the “Company”) on December 4, 2007 and is designed to offer incentive compensation to the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice Presidents of the Company by rewarding the achievement of specifically
measured corporate objectives and, if applicable, individual performance objectives. 
 Administration 
 The 2008 Bonus Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will be responsible for approving, or recommending to the Board of
Directors for approval, any cash incentive awards to executive officers of the Company, including any incentive awards to the Chief Executive Officer. 
 Eligibility 
 The Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice Presidents of the Company are eligible to participate in the 2008 Bonus Plan.

 Corporate and Individual Performance 
 The 2008 Bonus
Plan provides for the payment of cash bonuses to participants for the achievement of corporate objectives relating to certain clinical and partnering goals determined by the Compensation Committee. Each participant, other than the Chief Executive
Officer, will also be subject to key individual performance objectives. The actual bonuses payable for 2008 (if any) will vary depending on the extent to which actual performance meets, exceeds or falls short of the corporate objectives and, other
than with respect to the Chief Executive Officer, applicable individual performance objectives approved by the Compensation Committee, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion, and on the level of the Company’s then current
or anticipated cash reserves. The Company’s Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee reserves the right to modify the corporate or individual performance objectives at any time based on business changes during the year. 
 Target Cash Bonus Amount 
 The 2008 Bonus Plan provides a target cash
bonus amount for the Chief Executive Officer and each Senior Vice President of the Company, expressed as a percentage of 2008 annual base salary for each participant.