alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                        $896,000
<SECURITIES>                                  $770,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               $1,643,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 $2,637,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $5,017,000
<PP&E>                                        $722,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $8,376,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       $1,695,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       $56,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  $6,625,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                $8,376,000
<SALES>                                     $2,930,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            $2,930,000
<CGS>                                       $1,515,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               $2,694,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $11,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               $236,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   $68,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           $168,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  $168,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $.003
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $.003
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Edward J. Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc.,
hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
2004 of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-KSB) upon my best knowledge and
belief fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Derma Sciences, Inc.

|Dated:  March 30, 2005 | /s/ Edward J. QuiltyEdward J. Quilty
     Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<MULTIPLIER>     1
        <S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                               1,990
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     1,990      
<PP&E>                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       1,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               61,960
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                            97,660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                        (157,630)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         1,990          
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     4,985       
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        3,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      1,985
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  1,985
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                         1,985
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0 
        

</TABLE>
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

CHAIR’S NOTICE

Visit www.NIGC.gov to learn more about the NIGC 3 For 35 Project— a 

year-long project emphasizing the importance of conversations among 

the tribal gaming regulatory community about workforce preparedness.

June 28, 2022, Chairman Simermeyer addressed an audience of tribal 

gaming regulators, California state law enforcement officials, and 

federal regulators and prosecutors. 

The San Manuel Tribal Nation Chairwoman Lynn Valbuena and its Gaming 

Commission Executive Director Adam Torres were gracious hosts and 

organizers for an important conversation around “Building a Culture of 

Compliance.”

I was grateful for the opportunity to share the National Indian Gaming 

Commission’s perspectives and cultivate partnerships across the 

compliance community. There is a shared value in protecting tribal 

assets derived from gaming. Threats to those assets are best mitigated 

by fully addressing the conditions that give rise to those risks. 

Partnerships across the compliance community can help lead to success 

in this area.

The presentation included insights into NIGC’s approach to Building a 

Culture of Compliance in Indian gaming’s regulatory community. I 

focused on the following:

 Building Partnerships with other federal offices in order to 

clearly create communications on policies such as recent NIGC 

Bulletins on the topics of Cannabis, Net Revenue Uses, and Human 

Trafficking. 

 Targeting High Risk compliance matters threatening financial 

assets and found to be repeat audit findings in past years;

 Planning for organization-wide cybersecurity awareness by 

approaching the increases ransomware incidents through a threepart plan of reviewing existing NIGC regulatory requirements, 

enhancing technical assistance, facilitating a network across 

tribal internal and state gaming regulation technology experts 

and, 

 Promoting a discussion on regulatory workforce needs and 

opportunities in order to have a forward looking plan to 

cultivate Indian gaming’s future regulatory workforce.

The event’s other presenters, its organizers, and its audience shared 

valuable insights around trends and best practices to address 

incidents of fraud and financial crimes.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of KT Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



/s/ SUK-CHAE LEESuk-Chae LeeChief Executive Officer


Date: June 29,
2010



/S/ YEON-HAK KIMYeon-Hak KimExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer


Date: June 29,
2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been
provided to KT Corporation and will be retained by KT Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20320

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NEMECIO RUBIO

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CR-239-3

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Nemecio Rubio has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Rubio has not filed a response. Our independent review of the

record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
#### Seryozha KHACHATRYAN; Zoya Khachatryan, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-76166.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 8, 2007.*

Filed Jan. 16, 2007.

Reynold E. Finnegan, Esq., Finnegan & Diba A Law Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security San Francisco, CA, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*720Before: ALARCÓN, HALL, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Seryozha Khachatryan and Zoya Khachatryan, natives and citizens of Armenia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying their motion to reopen so they could apply for asylum based on changed circumstances. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, *Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft,*383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), *amended by*404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the Khachatryans’ motion to reopen as untimely where they filed the motion more than two years after the BIA’s final order of removal, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and the evidence they submit, including documentation that lead petitioner’s brother was beaten by unidentified “thugs,” does not establish a sufficient change of conditions in Armenia. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); *see also Malty v. Ashcroft,*381 F.3d 942, 945 (9th Cir.2004) (requiring circumstances to “have changed sufficiently that a petitioner who previously did not have a legitimate claim for asylum now has a well-founded fear of future persecution”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 21.1





CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY





The following are wholly-owned or majority-owned subsidiaries of Credence Systems Corporation as of January 28, 2003:





Credence Europa Limited, a private limited company in the United Kingdom;





Credence International Limited, Inc., a Delaware corporation;





Credence (M), SDN Bhd, a Malaysian corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of Credence Systems Corporation);





Credence Management Europe AG, a Swiss corporation;





Credence (P),
Inc., a Philippines corporation (an indirect subsidiary of Credence Systems Corporation);





Credence Systems
Armenia L.L.C., an Armenian limited liability company;





Credence Systems Europe GmbH, a German corporation (a
wholly owned subsidiary of Credence Europa Limited);





Credence Systems International, Inc., a Barbados
corporation;





Credence Systems KK, a Japanese company;





Credence Systems Korea, a South Korea company (a wholly owned subsidiary of Credence International Limited, Inc.);





Credence Systems (UK) Limited, a private limited company in the United Kingdom (a wholly owned subsidiary of Credence Europa Limited);





Credence-SZ Systems GmbH, a German corporation;





IMS Deutschland GmbH, a German corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of Credence Management Europe AG);





IMS France SARL, a French company (a wholly owned subsidiary of Credence Management Europe AG);





IMS Japan KK, a Japanese company;





IMS UK Ltd., a private limited
company in the United Kingdom;





Innotech-Credence Corporation, a Japanese company (a joint venture with Innotech
Corporation, majority owned by the Company);





Opmaxx, Inc.; and





Optonics, Inc., a California corporation.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report on Form  10-K/A of WNC  California
Housing Tax Credits III, L.P. (the  "Partnership")  for the year ended March 31,
2007 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

     3. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
     15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent that
     such  provisions  require the audit  reports of Local  Limited  Partnership
     financial  statements  to  refer to the  standards  of the  Public  Company
     Accounting Oversight Board.

     4. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.


Date: September 8, 2009




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial  Officer of WNC &m Associates, Inc.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

To the Board of Directors
Of Momo S.p.A.

We have audited the accompanying combined and consolidated balance sheet of the 
Momo group as of 30 June 1997 and the related combined and consolidated income 
statement, retained earnings and cash flows for the year then ended. These 
financial statements are the responsibility of the management of Momo, S.p.A. 
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted 
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free 
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in 
all material respects, the financial position of Momo Group as of 30 June 1997, 
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles as defined in the 
United States.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick
KPMG Peat Marwick
Milan, 25 July 1997
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Brinson, Appellant.

Submitted May 7, 2012;

decided May 31, 2012

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
EXHIBIT 21  Subsidiaries
of Registrant As of January 3, 2009  Subsidiaries
  
  State or Jurisdiction
  of Incorporation
  
  Percentage of Voting
  Securities OwnedAiC Analysts Limited
  
  United Kingdom
  
  100.0
  %Medical Concepts Staffing, Inc.
  
  Minnesota
  
  100.0
  %Analysts International Strategic Sourcing
  Services, LLC
  
  Minnesota
  
  100.0
  %Analysts International Business Resources
  Services, LLC
  
  Minnesota
  
  100.0
  %Analysts International Business Solutions
  Services, LLC
  
  Minnesota
  
  100.0
  %Analysts International Management Services,
  LLC
  
  Minnesota
  
  100.0
  %
EXHIBIT 3(c)

                             APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY

                               ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                      TO THE
                  RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, AS AMENDED

      1.     The name of the corporation is APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY.

      2.     The Amendment adopted is to remove in its entirety ARTICLE
V, Clause 7(B)(b) from the Restated Articles of Incorporation, as
amended.

      3.     On January 30, 1997, notice of the meeting, accompanied
by a copy of the Amendment, was given in the manner provided in the
Virginia Stock Corporation Act to each of the Corporation's
shareholders of record.  The foregoing Amendment was adopted by the
shareholders of the Corporation on February 28, 1997.

      4.     On January 29, 1997, the foregoing Amendment was proposed
by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, which found adoption
of the Amendment to be in the Corporation's best interest and
directed that it be submitted to the shareholders of the Corporation
for their approval at a special meeting on February 28, 1997.

      5.     Holders of the shares of the Corporation's common stock
and preferred stock were eligible to vote separately as a class in
the adoption of the Amendment.  The number of shares of common stock
and preferred stock voted for the Amendment was sufficient to approve
the Amendment.  The designation, the number of outstanding shares
on the record date, the number of votes entitled to be cast by each
voting group entitled to vote separately on the foregoing Amendment
and the undisputed number of votes cast for, against and abstaining
from the Amendment were as follows:

                                            Undisputed Votes Cast
                             Entitled
Class           Outstanding  to Vote        For    Against  Abstain

Cumulative 
Preferred 
Stock,
no par value    2,198,150    2,198,150 

Common Stock 
no par value                13,499,500     13,499,500

 
                                            APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY


                                            By_/s/ John M. Adams, Jr.
                                               John M. Adams, Jr.
                                              Assistant Secretary
March 3, 1997
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   -----------------------------------------



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement Files No. 33-84092 and 333-14385.


                                                /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                                ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Melville, New York
March 31, 1998


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   -----------------------------------------



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement Files No. 33-84092 and 333-14385.


                                                /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                                ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Melville, New York
March 31, 1998
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4004 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4004

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain structures, parts, and 
components for use in an isotopic separation facility in southern Ohio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2006

 Mr. DeWine (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
        bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
        FinanceYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain structures, parts, and 
components for use in an isotopic separation facility in southern Ohio.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN STRUCTURES, PARTS, AND COMPONENTS FOR USE IN AN 
              ISOTOPIC SEPARATION FACILITY IN SOUTHERN OHIO.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.13.75        Certain structures,     Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           parts, and components                                             31/2009          ''
                           for use in an                                                                       .
                           isotopic separation
                           facility (isotopic
                           separation equipment)
                           consisting of cold
                           boxes, feed ovens,
                           and feed purification
                           systems, including
                           their associated
                           cooling systems,
                           control systems,
                           weighing systems, and
                           cylinder handling
                           systems, for the
                           construction of an
                           isotopic separation
                           facility in southern
                           Ohio known as the
                           ``American Centrifuge
                           Plant'' (provided for
                           in subheading
                           8401.20.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```