alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-70,326]

                    By application dated September 18, 2009, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on August 14, 2009. The Notice of Determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 22, 2009 (74 FR 48302).                

The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the finding that imports of Ford F Series pickups and Lincoln Mark LT sports-utility pickups did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm. The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not shift production of Ford F Series pickups and Lincoln Mark LT sports-utility pickups to foreign countries during the period under investigation.

In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleged that employment at the subject firm was negatively impacted by a shift in production of pickups from the subject firm to South Africa, Thailand, Mexico and Canada. The petitioner also alleged that imports of directly competitive products with Ford F Series pickups contributed importantly to the decline in sales at the subject facility.

The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

## Conclusion

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of September 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-25159 Filed 10-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 99.1


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter
ended  June 30,  2002 (the  "Report")  by  Bentley  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.  (the
"Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.




                                                /s/ James R. Murphy
                                                --------------------------------
                                                James R. Murphy
                                                Chairman, President and Chief
                                                Executive Officer
                                                (Chief executive officer)

                                                August 8, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PIMCO
ADVISORS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          29,396
<SECURITIES>                                    29,206
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,055
<PP&E>                                          10,273<F1> 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 359,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,825
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       289,910<F2> 
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,438)<F3> 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   359,116
<SALES>                                              0<F4> 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               219,093<F5> 
<CGS>                                                0<F4> 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,031<F6> 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,004<F7> 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,055
<INCOME-TAX>                                       453
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             50,602
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    50,602
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66<F8> 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64<F9> 
        
<FN> 
<F1>  Net of accumulated depreciation and amortization.
<F2>  Entity is a partnership. Amount shown represents Partners' Capital.
<F3>  Amount shown comprises Unamortized Compensation.
<F4>  The partnership is in the service business and has no sales or cost of 
      goods sold of tangible products.
<F5>  Amount shown comprises revenues from services.
<F6>  Amount shown comprises costs of services.
<F7>  Amount shown is from amortization of intangible assets.
<F8>  Amount shown is for the Partnership's General Partner and Class A Limited
      Partner Units.
<F9>  Amount is for the Partnership's Class B Limited Partner Units.
</FN> 

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         798,120
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,954
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               800,074
<PP&E>                                       5,316,344
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,813,406)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,259,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,076
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,344,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,259,103
<SALES>                                        477,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               477,181
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               376,259
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             148,172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (47,727)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (47,727)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 397,437
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   349,710
<EPS-BASIC>                                      68.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    68.39


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.3**

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

**LAMAR SIGNAL PROCESSING LTD.**

 

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of LAMAR SIGNAL PROCESSING LTD. (the“Company”) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ deficiency and cash flows for each of the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of theCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. 

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and in accordance with generally acceptedauditing standards in Israel, including those prescribed under the Auditors’ Regulations (Auditor’s Mode of Performance), 1973. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether thefinancial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose ofexpressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in thefinancial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, inall material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations, changes in shareholders’ deficiency and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity withaccounting principles generally accepted in Israel (as applicable to the financial position and results of operations of the Company such principles are practically identical to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States).

 

Without qualifying our opinion we draw attention to Note 1C to the financialstatements, according to which as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company has a shareholders’ deficiency in the amount of $2.3 and $2.2 million and a working capital deficiency of $2.3 and $2.2 million, respectively. These factors, amongothers described in Note 1C raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments with respect to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and theirclassification that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue to operate as a going concern.” 

 

**/s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER**

**An member of Ernst &Young International**

 

Haifa, Israel 

March 23, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 1997 and Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the six months ended March 31, 1997, and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (59)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,720
<PP&E>                                          24,330
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,215)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,928
<BONDS>                                         22,407
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              219
<PREFERRED>                                         11
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                     188,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,585
<SALES>                                          4,634
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,818
<CGS>                                            4,248
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (857)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    543
<INCOME-TAX>                                        40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                503
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       503
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           923,287
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      36,817
<MORTGAGE>                                      70,697
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      482
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,471,400
<CASH>                                          23,261
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              11,004
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         223,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,915,259
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                289,765
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             52,666
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  58,484
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,013,602
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 39,192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          103,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,021
<OTHER-SE>                                     238,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,915,259
<PREMIUMS>                                     279,831
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            105,392
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 466
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,098
<BENEFITS>                                     175,170
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     32,425
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           123,008
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,730
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,370
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,260
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,360
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  45,775
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            148,114
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                 (655)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             122,198
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                16,296
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 54,740
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Derrick C. and Others, Infants. Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Steven C., Appellant.

Submitted April 4, 2011;

decided May 10, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3105 

To expand the scope of the definition of airport planning to include waste 

management planning. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2010 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To expand the scope of the definition of airport planning 

to include waste management planning. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SOLID WASTE RECYCLING PLANS. 

4 (a) AIRPORT PLANNING.—Section 47102(5) of title 

5 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(5) ‘airport planning’— 

7 ‘‘(A) has the meaning given the term 

8 ‘planning’ in regulations prescribed by the Sec9 retary; and 

10 ‘‘(B) includes— 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3105 IS

1 ‘‘(i) integrated airport system plan2 ning; and 

3 ‘‘(ii) a plan for recycling and mini4 mizing the generation of airport solid 

5 waste, in accordance with applicable State 

6 and local recycling laws, including the cost 

7 of a waste audit.’’. 

8 (b) MASTER PLAN.—Section 47106(a) of title 49, 

9 United States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

11 end; 

12 (2) in paragraph (5), by striking the period at 

13 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(6) if the project is for an airport that has an 

16 airport master plan, the master plan addresses— 

17 ‘‘(A) the feasibility of solid waste recycling 

18 at the airport; 

19 ‘‘(B) minimizing the generation of solid 

20 waste at the airport; 

21 ‘‘(C) operation and maintenance require22 ments; 

23 ‘‘(D) the review of waste management con24 tracts; 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3105 IS

1 ‘‘(E) the potential for cost savings or the 

2 generation of revenue; and 

3 ‘‘(F) training and education require4 ments.’’. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
97-492.

#### State v. Allen.

Franklin App. No. 97APA01-51. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>       DEC-31-1996

<S>                                        <C>
<CASH>                                     $   921,065
<SECURITIES>                                   197,697
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,730,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                    52,521
<INVENTORY>                                  4,774,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,926,077
<PP&E>                                       1,934,724
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,066,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,794,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,090,003
<BONDS>                                      2,157,786
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,896,099
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,611,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,794,250
<SALES>                                      9,244,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,244,109
<CGS>                                        5,913,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,774,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (279,457)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             293,290
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,544,217)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,222,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (322,217)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.08)


</TABLE>
#### Habitat, Ltd., Appellant, v Art of the Muse, Inc., Doing Business as Oly Studio, et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 4, 2011;

decided May 10, 2011

*889Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CNH Holdings  Company,  Inc.
(dba Cistera  Networks) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Derek Downs,  President and Interim CEO of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Derek Downs
Derek Downs
President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)


November 12, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.