alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6556 

WILLIE J. BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General for the State

of South Carolina; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(0:05-cv-01064-DCN)

Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 6, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie J. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Samuel

Creighton Waters, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Willie J. Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.7

CERTIFICATION

I, David M. Velazquez, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Atlantic City Electric Company; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                         
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 5, 2012 |  | /s/ DAVID M. VELAZQUEZ                                  
|                    |  | David M. Velazquez President
and Chief Executive Officer
INTER
PARFUMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES





Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an
officer of Inter Parfums, Inc., that the Annual Report of Inter Parfums, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2008, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Inter Parfums,
Inc.





Date:
      May 8, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/ Russell GreenbergRussell
      GreenbergExecutive
      Vice President,Chief
      Financial Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Inter Parfums, Inc. and will be retained by Inter Parfums, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000892968
<NAME> WATSON WYATT & COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          41,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,832
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,853
<PP&E>                                         128,448
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 329,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          179,676
<BONDS>                                        108,575
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,805
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   329,960
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               624,583
<CGS>                                          512,329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  593,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,843
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,195
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,648
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,533
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# Skill #1

&"Times New Roman,Bold"Vehicle Inspection and Equipment Location		&"Times New Roman,Bold"Skill #1

&P	

&P	
https://doimspp.sharepoint.com/sites/blm-fa/fire-operations/SitePages/NFEP-Policy-Resources.aspx

# Code Page

# image1.png
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 14 (Friday, January 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1293]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New 
Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 17, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, March 17, 2009, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time. For more information 
please contact Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085. If 
you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please 
write Audrey Y. Jenkins, TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton 
Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or you can post comments to the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 13, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E9-1293 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 14 (Friday, January 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4178-4179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1350]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-503-000]


BC Landfill Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

January 14, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
BC Landfill Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice

[[Page 4179]]

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone filing a motion to 
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is February 3, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c7a796e7f7352505552596f494c4c534e487c5a594e5f125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="45030017060a2b292c2b20163035352a373105232037266b222a33">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-1350 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            In connection with the Quarterly Report of eTotalSource, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date  May 12, 2005             By:     /s/ Virgil Baker
                                       ----------------
                               Name:   Virgil Baker
                               Title:  Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to eTotalSource, Inc. and
will be retained by eTotalSource, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Blake Wingate, Appellant.

Submitted August 2, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17


                       SECOND AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT


        THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT ("Second Amendment") is entered
into as of August 13, 1997, between LEGEND PROPERTIES, INC. ("Legend"), as
Borrower, and RGI Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings"), as Lender.

                                    RECITALS

        A. Legend and Holdings entered into that certain Loan Agreement dated as
of March 31, 1997 (the "Loan Agreement"), pursuant to which Holdings agreed to
make loans to Legend during the period beginning March 31, 1997 and ending
December 31, 1997, in the aggregate principal sum of $8,500,000.00 (the
"Commitment").

        B. Legend and Holdings agreed to increase the Commitment to
$17,000,000.00 pursuant to the First Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of May
30, 1997 (the "First Amendment").

        C. Legend and Holdings now desire to further modify the Loan Agreement
to increase the Commitment to $21,000,000.00.

        NOW, THEREFORE, Legend and Holdings hereby agree as follows:

        1. Section 1.1 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended by replacing
"$17,000,000" with "$21,000,000." As a condition precedent to the increase the
Loans, Borrower shall execute and deliver to Lender the following documents:

           a.  This Second Amendment;

           b.  A replacement promissory note in the form attached hereto, which
               shall replace Exhibit A to the Loan Agreement; and

           c.  Evidence of the Borrower's corporate authority to enter into this
               Second Amendment.

        2. The increased amount of loans described in this Second Amendment
shall not be secured by the Mortgaged Property, as defined in the Loan
Agreement, located in Virginia, Maryland and California.

        3. Except as amended by this Second Amendment, all other terms of the
Loan Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


<PAGE>   2
        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Second Amendment to be
executed by their respective officers or agents thereunto duly authorized as of
the date first above written.

BORROWER:                              LENDER:

LEGEND PROPERTIES, INC.                RGI HOLDINGS, INC.


By  /s/ RAYMOND J. WHITTY              By /s/ KENNETH L. UPTAIN
   --------------------------            -----------------------------
   Raymond J. Whitty                     Kenneth L. Uptain
Its Treasurer                          Its President



                                       2
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 21


                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                  ------------


Registrant:  Angelica Corporation, State of Incorporation:  Missouri

Subsidiaries:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                          PERCENTAGE OF VOTING
                   NAME                            STATE OF INCORPORATION                   SECURITIES OWNED
                                                                                             BY REGISTRANT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>                                                <C>
Angelica Realty Co.                                      California                                100%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Angelica Textile Services, Inc.                          California                                100
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Angelica International Ltd.                     Federal Corporation, Canada                        100
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Angelica Textile Services, Inc.                           New York                                 100
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southern Service Company                                 California                                100
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


Registrant's Life Uniform segment includes a chain of 249 retail uniform
specialty shops operating under the umbrella name of "Life Uniform and Shoe
Shops." Generally, all shops operating in a specific state form one company
incorporated under the laws of that state. All such corporations (38) are
wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant.

All of the above subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial
statements filed herewith.
97- 33.

#### State ex rel. Ochs v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 95APD10-1359.

This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellants’ application for dismissal, •

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
#### Clifford Leon HOUSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James F. LOGAN, Jr., DefendantAppellee.

No. 11-6379.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 21, 2012.

ON BRIEF: James F. Logan, Jr., Logan-Thompson, P.C., Cleveland, Tennessee, for Appellee. Clifford Leon Houston, Ten Mile, Tennessee, pro se.

Before: KEITH, MARTIN, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us upon initial consideration to determine whether Clifford Houston’s appeal is properly before the court.

The record establishes that the district court entered an order on November 3, 2011, denying Houston’s third motion to recuse United States District Court Judge Thomas W. Phillips. Houston filed his notice of appeal from that order on November 3, 2011.

Although an order denying recusal is generally not immediately appealable, it may be reviewed in a mandamus proceed*614ing. *In re Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,*919 F.2d 1136, 1143 (6th Cir.1990) (en banc). A notice of appeal from an order which is not immediately appealable may be treated as a petition for a writ of mandamus. *Van Meter v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.,*1 F.3d *445, 451 n. 8*(6th Cir.1993), *overruled on other grounds by Blackburn v. Oaktree Capital Mgmt., LLC,*511 F.3d 633 (6th Cir.2008); *Hammons v. Teamsters Local No. 20,*754 F.2d 177, 179 (6th Cir.1985); *see also Gresham v. Corr. Med. Servs., Inc.,*650 F.3d 628, 630 (6th Cir.2011). However, “[t]he remedy of mandamus is a drastic one, to be invoked only in extraordinary situations where the petitioner can show a clear and indisputable right to the relief sought.” *In re Am. President Lines, Ltd.,*929 F.2d 226, 227 (6th Cir.1991). An order denying recusal is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. *Reed v. Rhodes,*179 F.3d 453, 467 n. 1 (6th Cir.1999). Unfavorable rulings by a district court judge are almost never a sufficient basis upon which to infer bias, and this court is not convinced that the district court abused its discretion in denying recusal. *Liteky v. United States,*510 U.S. 540, 555, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994); *Woodruff v. Tomlin,*593 F.2d 33, 44 (6th Cir.1979).

In construing Houston’s notice of appeal as a petition for a writ of mandamus, we find that the notice does not meet the requirements entitling Houston to mandamus relief. *See In re Metro. Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson Cnty.,*606 F.3d 855, 863-64 (6th Cir.2010). Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal is dismissed, and the notice of appeal, construed as a petition for writ of mandamus, is denied. Houston may raise his recusal issues, however, in his appeal from the district court’s judgment in *Houston v. Logan,*No. 3:11-cv-97 (E.D.Tenn. Dec. 21, 2011).
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION * IN THE

FOR REINSTATEMENT OF

LAURA ELIZABETH JORDAN * COURT OF APPEALS

TO THE BAR OF MARYLAND

* OF MARYLAND

* Misc. Docket AG No. 9 6

* September Term, 20 20

ORDER

Upon consideration of the P etition for Reinstatement and Bar Counsel’s Consent to

Petition for Reinstatement

, filed in the above

- captioned case , it is th is 2 9 th day of June

,

20 2 1

,

ORDERED

, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Petition be, and the

same hereby is, GRANTED ; and it is further

ORDERED, that Laura Elizabeth Jordan is reinstated as a member of the Bar of

Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED , that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name Laura Elizabeth

Jordan upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and certify that

fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in

this State.

/s/ Robert N. McDonald

Senior Judge