alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13359]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated January 9, 2009, and published in the Federal 
Register on January 21, 2009, (74 FR 3643), Organix Inc., 240 Salem 
Street, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801, made application by renewal to the 
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in 
schedules I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Cocaine (9041).............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for sale to its customers for research purposes.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 USC 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Organix Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled 
substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has 
investigated Organix Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is 
consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with State and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above 
named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: June 3, 2009.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-13359 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
**Exhibit 23**

 

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

 

 

                We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-19180, 33-89896, 33-25244 and33-87626 of Analysts International Corporation on Form S-8 of our report datedFebruary 27, 2002 (March 18, 2002 as to the last paragraph of note E),incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AnalystsInternational Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2001.

 
|                          |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |   |
|                          |   |

 

Minneapolis,Minnesota

March 29, 2002

 

 

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2970 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2970

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow rehabilitation 
expenditures for public school buildings to qualify for rehabilitation 
                                credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 29, 2010

 Mr. Webb (for himself and Mr. Warner) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow rehabilitation 
expenditures for public school buildings to qualify for rehabilitation 
                                credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rehabilitation of Historic Schools 
Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. QUALIFICATION OF REHABILITATION EXPENDITURES FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL 
              BUILDINGS FOR REHABILITATION CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 47(c)(2)((B)(v) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 (relating to tax-exempt use property) is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subclause:
                                    ``(III) Clause not to apply to 
                                public schools.--This clause shall not 
                                apply in the case of any building which 
                                is a qualified public educational 
                                facility (as defined in section 
                                142(k)(1), determined without regard to 
                                subparagraph (B) thereof) and used as 
                                such both before and after such 
                                expenditure.''.
    (b) Report.--Not later than the date which is 5 years after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury, after 
consultation with the heads of appropriate Federal agencies, shall 
report to Congress on the effects resulting from the amendment made by 
subsection (a).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations found on
pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          30,312
<SECURITIES>                                 7,481,250
<RECEIVABLES>                                  916,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                    46,763
<INVENTORY>                                    171,093
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,153,503
<PP&E>                                       6,154,771
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,797,223
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,146,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,691,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,191
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,594,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,146,396
<SALES>                                      3,969,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,969,387
<CGS>                                        2,426,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,426,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,611,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             188,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,330,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,330,639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20


</TABLE>
Haz lo Correcto y Prevención de Acoso Sexual Lista de Asistencia del Curso 

Al firmar este formulario, se certifica que el(los) empleado(s) listado(s) en este formulario han completado los requisitos de 

capacitación enumerados a continuación. 

Nombre del Empleado Firma del Empleado Titulo Agencia/Oficina Fecha de Finalización

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Requisitos de Capacitación

Recibir y leer los siguientes documentos (estos documentos serán proporcionados por el supervisor que firma este formulario):

1. Información del Proceso EEO

2. Información de Prevención de Acoso Sexual

3. Departamento del Interior Prevención y Eliminación de Conducta de Acoso, Boletín de Personal 18-01 (PB 18-01)

4. Memorando del Acta Sin Miedo y Recurso Suplementario de EEO Diversidad & Inclusión & Acta Sin Miedo (ubicado en la Sección de Material 

del Curso)

Nombre del Supervisor: Firma del Supervisor:: Fecha:

Número de Teléfono del Supervisor:

Correo Electrónico:

Oficina:

Envíe por correo electrónico la lista de asistencia del curso a su respectivo gerente de EEO estatal y a BLM_FA_EEO@blm.gov
Exhibit 31.2




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Jon D. Klugh, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Infinity, Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting






Date: November 15, 2004




/s/ Jon D. Klugh


Jon D. Klugh, Chief Financial Officer








35
[J-68-2017][M.O. - Wecht, J.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

HELEN JONES,

Appellant

v.

RON OTT AND/OR EASTERN 

ELEVATOR SERVICE AND SALES 

COMPANY,

Appellees

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 12 WAP 2017

Appeal from the Order of the Superior 

Court entered 9/27/16 at No. 930 WDA 

2015, affirming the order of the Court of 

Common Pleas of Cambria County 

entered 5/27/15 at No. 2010-2490

ARGUED: October 17, 2017

CONCURRING OPINION

CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR DECIDED: AUGUST 21, 2018

I join the majority’s alternate rationale, namely, that Appellant’s counsel 

affirmatively waived any objections to the jury instructions issued by the trial court, when 

he replied as follows to the court’s inquiry: “I have no issues with the charge, Your 

Honor,” N.T., Apr. 29, 2015, at 25. See Majority Opinion, Part II(b). From my point of 

view, the court was then justified in proceeding on the basis that no further issues would 

be raised relative to the jury instructions. Accord Bodine v. Boyd, 383 Pa. 525, 119 

A.2d 274, 276-77 (1956) (determining, via adoption of a trial court’s opinion, that 

counsel’s reply of “I have nothing, sir” to a similar post-charge inquiry by a trial court 

constituted an “actual affirmative waiver” of any objection). 
[J-68-2017][M.O. – Wecht, J.] - 2

I find the present law to be less clear concerning whether submission of 

proposed points for charge, in a civil case, suffices to preserve subsequent challenges 

to a jury charge. Accordingly, and while I ultimately agree with the majority’s policybased rationale that something more should be required, I would interpose further 

requirements on a prospective basis only.
#### HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P. and Hewlett-Packard Company, Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Gateway, Inc., Intervenor.

No. 2006-1217.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 13, 2006.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the unopposed motion of Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. et al and Gateway, Inc. to dismiss this appeal, due to settlement,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-39387) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-3806, 333-27499,
33-90728, 33-76542, and 33-90366) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan, 1994
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1992 EPRO Stock Option Plan, and the EPRO
Incentive Stock Option Plan of Credence Systems Corporation of our report dated
November 26, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Credence Systems Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-
K) for the year ended October 31, 1997.

                                         /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP



San Jose, California
January 26, 1998
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Paul S. Shipman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Redhook Ale Brewery, Incorporated; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annualreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions); (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:March 26, 2008       BY: /s/ Paul S. Shipman              Paul S. Shipman         *Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco VARGAS-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-40312

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 30, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Francisco Vargas-Rodriguez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute “more *383than 50 grams, that is, approximately 11.16 kilograms, gross weight, of methamphetamine,” in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). Finding no error, we affirm.

Vargas-Rodríguez first contends that the government was required to allege and prove that he knew both the type and quantity of drug involved. As he properly concedes, his argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez,*319 F.3d 695, 699-700 (5th Cir.2003); he raises it here solely to preserve it for further review.

In his second issue on appeal, Vargas-Rodriguez asserts that the district court erroneously applied the sentencing guidelines as mandatory in violation of his Sixth Amendment rights. Our review of the sentencing transcripts convinces us otherwise.

The court referred to the guidelines as advising the court, and the government noted their advisory nature. The court stated that Vargas-Rodriguez’s age and lack of criminal history made the court hesitant about imposing a long sentence, but the court also stated that it did not want to encourage drug dealers to focus on using older persons without criminal records as drug mules merely because there would be a lower sentence. The court also noted that, although a longer sentence might not provide deterrence, retribution is also a goal of the guidelines.

Thus, the court plainly considered the effect of Vargas-Rodriguez’s age and criminal history in determining the appropriate sentence. The transcript makes it plain that the court concluded that the guidelines in this case provided the appropriate sentence. This was a proper exercise of sentencing discretion. *See United States v. Smith,*440 F.3d 704, 707 (5th Cir.2006).

Because the sentence was within the correct guidelines range, it is entitled to a presumption of reasonableness. *See id.*Vargas-Rodríguez has failed to rebut that presumption.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 108 (Monday, June 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13227]

[[Page 27140]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1196-000]

Lost Creek Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

May 29, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Lost Creek Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is June 19, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail [email protected]. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13227 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```