alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John S. Roberts, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Union Security Insurance Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 9, 2007



/s/ John S. RobertsJohn S. RobertsInterim President and Chief Executive Officer
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

CHAIR’S NOTICE

Visit www.NIGC.gov to learn more about the NIGC 3 For 35 Project— a 

year-long project emphasizing the importance of conversations among 

the tribal gaming regulatory community about workforce preparedness.

The North American Gaming Regulators Association (NAGRA) held a 

virtual gathering of its Indian gaming interest group today, 

September 6, 2022. NAGRA is a nonprofit professional association 

of North American gaming regulators that brings together 

agencies that regulate gaming activities and provides them a 

forum for the mutual exchange of regulatory information and 

techniques. Its gatherings provide the NIGC the opportunity to 

enhance relationships across state, provincial, tribal, and 

federal regulators.

I provided an update on three topics:

• NIGC’s 3For35 campaign’s goal of supporting opportunities 

for the regulatory community to enhance and plan for a 

stronger workforce in coming years;

• ways in which NIGC’s aggressive review of policy topics 

starting in 2021 allows for its guidance and regulations to 

better reflect current risk and allow more efficient 

regulatory oversight; and

• the importance of regulatory cyber security efforts that 

protect Indian gaming‘s reputation for its regulatory 

capacity and engage tribal lawmakers articulating public 

cyber security policy objectives.

Today’s discussion also provided me and the NIGC Chief of Staff, 

Dustin Thomas an opportunity to outline upcoming NIGC outreach 

events like its National Cyber Security Summit (held virtually 

in November) and October presentations at G2E in Las Vegas, 

Nevada regarding digital wallets and emerging considerations 

around Indian gaming’s management agreements.

I’m grateful Meghan Frye and the NAGRA leadership for the 

opportunity to participate in its virtual meet up. Like the past 

NAGRA in-person opportunities, today’s virtual meet up is a 

great opportunity to support the gaming regulatory community and 

our shared work.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerardo LIEVANOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41471.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern Dis*463trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Landau, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gerardo Lievanos appeals his guilty-plea conviction of possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. Lievanos argues, for the first time on appeal, that the district court lacked jurisdiction to convict and sentence him because 21 U.S.C. § 841 is unconstitutional under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Lievanos correctly concedes that his arguments are foreclosed by our opinion in *United States v. Slaughter,*238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir.2000). He raises the issue to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE DATA IN THIS SCHEDULE ARE EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED 1996 FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF ARTISTIC GREETINGS INCORPORATED AND ARE QUALIFIED IN THEIR
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000007610
<NAME> ARTISTIC GREETINGS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              99
<SECURITIES>                                     2,900
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                       112
<INVENTORY>                                      2,270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,085
<PP&E>                                          26,609     
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,372     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,950
<BONDS>                                          1,034
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           604
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,998
<SALES>                                         98,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,911
<CGS>                                           40,665
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   870
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,358
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (317)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,675
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,675
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 108 (Monday, June 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27140-27141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER06-615-000; ER07-1257-000; ER08-1113-000; ER08-1178-000; 
ER09-241-000]


California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of 
FERC Staff Attendance

May 29, 2009.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that on the following dates members of its staff will 
participate in teleconferences and meetings to be conducted by the 
California Independent System Operator (CAISO). The agenda and other 
documents for the teleconferences and meetings are available on the 
CAISO's Web site, http://www.caiso.com.
    June 1, 2009 Market Simulation Review.
    June 2, 2009 Systems Interface User Group.
    Market Simulation Checkpoint.
    June 3, 2009 Settlements and Market Clearing User Group. Congestion 
Revenue Rights.
    June 4, 2009 Market Simulation Checkpoint.
    June 9, 2009 Systems Interface User Group. Market Simulation 
Checkpoint.
    June 10, 2009 Settlements and Market Clearing User Group. 
Congestion Revenue Rights.
    June 11, 2009 Market Simulation Checkpoint.
    June 16, 2009 Systems Interface User Group.
    Sponsored by the CAISO, the teleconferences and meetings are open 
to all market participants, and

[[Page 27141]]

Commission staff's attendance is part of the Commission's ongoing 
outreach efforts. The teleconferences and meetings may discuss matters 
at issue in the above captioned dockets.
    For further information, contact Saeed Farrokhpay at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3043515555541e565142425f5b5840514970565542531e575f46"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e19280848485cf878093938e8a89918098a187849382cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>; (916) 294-0322 or Maury Kruth at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cea3afbbbcb7e0a5bcbbbaa68ea8abbcade0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="412c203433386f2a3334352901272433226f262e37">[email protected]</span></a>, (916) 294-0275.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13224 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7190

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LAVON M. WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:15-cv-00220-FDW-DSC-2; 3:21-cv00084-FDW)

Submitted: February 9, 2022 Decided: February 24, 2022

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lavon M. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lavon M. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Biography

National Indian Gaming Commission

TULSA REGION DIRECTOR

MARCELIN R. OBER

Marcelin R. Ober serves as the Region Director for the Nation Indian Gaming 

Commission’s Tulsa Region. She is responsible for training, technical assistance 

and compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act for 75 gaming operations 

and 19 gaming tribes in Eastern Oklahoma and Kansas.

Ober previously served as a Compliance Officer for the Tulsa Region and as a

Field Investigator when the NIGC monitored casinos in Oklahoma, Kansas and 

Texas. Prior to joining the NIGC, Ober served as the Executive Director for the 

Seneca-Cayuga Nation including the positon as Gaming Commissioner.

Throughout her career, Ober has been recognized by the Commission for her work in 

regulatory compliance and gaming integrity.

Ober is a graduate of Missouri Southern University, Joplin, Missouri, with a 

Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science. 

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act created the National Indian Gaming Commission to support tribal self-sufficiency and the integrity of Indian gaming. 

NIGC oversees the efficient regulation of 524 gaming establishments operated by 248 tribes across 29 states.

Updated 9/1/2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,976
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     60,739
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,557
<PP&E>                                          70,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                (45,878)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,697
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,414
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,078)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   112,619
<SALES>                                         14,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,604
<CGS>                                            4,376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  545,563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (527,959)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (527,959)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
ssrpamendment-dec2021






  ADT LLC Administrative Committee  Certificate of Committee Action  Pursuant to the authority granted to the Administrative Committee in accordance with the  Administrative Committee Charter, which gives the Administrative Committee plan sponsor  authority to adopt amendments to the retirement plans and programs sponsored by ADT LLC (the  “Company”), so long as the aggregate cost with respect to each amendment that is adopted does  not exceed $200,000, and by acting in their capacity as members of the Administrative Committee,  the Administrative Committee hereby takes the following actions:    1. Adopt Amendment 2021-1 to the ADT LLC Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan  (the “SSRP”). Certify and adopt Amendment 2021-1 to the SSRP in substantially the same  form as attached hereto as of the date set forth below to:  (a) Amount of Deferral Election. Changing the limit of Bonus Compensation deferrals  to 80%.    Executed this __ day of December, 2021    ___________________________   _________________________________  Date       Brian Casey    ___________________________   _________________________________  Date       Dan Pikelny    ___________________________   _________________________________  Date       Peeyush Agarwal          DocuSign Envelope ID: 0F91DF74-2EB7-42A2-825B-0BF8118CC7EE 12/15/2021 | 2:19:45 PM PST 12/15/2021 | 5:20:02 PM EST 12/15/2021 | 5:13:09 PM EST  2  #83060449_v1      AMENDMENT 2021-1  TO THE  ADT LLC SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS AND RETIREMENT PLAN    The ADT LLC Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan, as amended and restated (the  “SSRP”), is hereby amended as follows:    1. Section 5.2 (Amount of Deferral Election) of the SSRP is hereby amended and restated in  its entirety to read as follows:  Pursuant to each Enrollment and Payment Agreement for a Plan Year a Participant shall  irrevocably elect to defer as a whole percentage: (i) up to 50% of his or her Base Salary  for the applicable Plan Year (or remainder of the year, as the case may be) and/or (ii) up  to 80% of his or her Bonus Compensation (net of required withholding) for the applicable  Fiscal Year, provided that no election to defer Bonus Compensation that is made on or  after the first day of the applicable Fiscal Year will be effective unless (i) the Bonus  Compensation qualifies as “performance-based compensation” under Section 409A of the  Code, (ii) there are at least six months left in the performance period at the time the  election is made, (iii) the Eligible Employee performs, or has performed, services for the  Company continuously from the later of the beginning of the performance period or the  date the performance criteria are established through the date of such election and (iv) the  Bonus Compensation is not readily ascertainable at the time of such election.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MYWEB INC.COM FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,369,490
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,435,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,213,034
<PP&E>                                         342,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,513,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,645,256
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       106,717
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,761,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,513,805
<SALES>                                      1,470,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,469,823
<CGS>                                        2,733,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,658,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,189,040)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,189,040)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>