alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Media Advisory Media Contact: Mary Parker

(202) 336-3470

MEDIA ADVISORY: Chairman Simermeyer and Vice Chair Hovland to Announce 

Indian Gaming’s 2022 Gross Gaming Revenues

Indian gaming continues to be a stable source of tribal economic development 

WASHINGTON, D.C. July 11, 2023 – National Indian Gaming Commission Chairman E. Sequoyah 

Simermeyer, and Vice Chair Jeannie Hovland are set to announce the Indian Gaming Industry’s Gross 

Gaming Revenue numbers for fiscal year 2022 at the WinStar World Resort and Casino in 

Thackerville, Oklahoma, July 19, 2023 during the NIGC Internal Audit Workshop. The annual 

announcement is based on independent audit reports from 519 Indian gaming establishments, operated

by 244 gaming tribes in 29 states, and is conducted in accordance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory 

Act.

WHO: NIGC Chairman E. Sequoyah Simermeyer 

NIGC Vice Chair Jeannie Hovland

Deputy Chief Financial Officer Josh Benefield

WHAT: The National Indian Gaming Commission will announce the 2022 gross gaming 

revenues of Indian gaming operations in the United States at the NIGC Internal 

Audit Workshop 

WHEN: Wednesday, July 19 

WHERE: WinStar World Resort and Casino, Thackerville, Oklahoma 

ACCESS OPTIONS:

• Livestream Announcement at 11:30am CDT – Register Here

• In person attendance: Live Announcement 11:30am – 12:00pm

CDT, Junior Ballroom

• Post Event 1:30pm CDT Media Roundtable with NIGC leadership (in

person or virtual) - Virtual Attendees Register Here

NOTES: Media wishing to attend in person MUST RSVP not later than Thursday, July 13, by 

4:30 p.m. CDT to Mary Parker at mary.parker@nigc.gov or 202-336-3470, to ensure 
entry to the conference. Press credentials must be worn at all times.

News release, and FY2022 GGR Report will be available at 

http://www.nigc.gov/public- affairs/conference-presentations immediately following

the live announcement. Media unable to join can view the announcement video on the

NIGC website July 19 after 12:00 p.m. CDT.

To learn more, visit www.nigc.gov and follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

###

The National Indian Gaming Commission’s mission is to support tribal self-sufficiency and the integrity of Indian 

gaming through effective regulation. Together with tribes and states, the NIGC regulates more than 520 gaming 

establishments operated by nearly 250 tribes across 29 states. To learn more, visit www.nigc.gov and follow us

on Facebook and Twitter.
**** **EXHIBIT
32**





**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**


**18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
connection with the Annual Report of Analysts International Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, Michael J.
LaVelle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David J. Steichen, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:








(1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Dated:
      March 17, 2005
    By:
    /s/
      Michael J. LaVelleMichael
      J. LaVelleChief
      Executive OfficerDated:
      March 17, 2005
    By:
    /s/
      David J. SteichenDavid
      J. SteichenChief
      Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Pieter Granberg, Respondent, v Dawn Lynn Granberg, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 396]

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Lim, J.), dated February 21, 2013, which, upon findings of fact of the same court (Hickey, S.M.) dated February 6, 2013, made after a hearing, inter alia, finding that she willfully violated a prior order of support dated November 13, 2006, and recommending that she be incarcerated for a period of six months, in effect, granted the petition, confirmed the finding of willfulness, and directed that she be incarcerated for a period of six months unless she paid the sum of $60,000.

Ordered that order dated February 21, 2013, is reversed, on the facts, without costs or disbursements, and the petition to adjudicate the mother in willful violation of the child support order dated November 13, 2006, is denied.

The mother’s failure to pay child support as directed in the order dated November 13, 2006, constituted “prima facie evidence of a willful violation” of an order of support (Family Ct Act § 454 [3] [a]; *see Matter of Probert v Probert,*67 AD3d 806, 807 [2009]). The burden then shifted to the mother to offer “some competent, credible evidence of [her] inability to make the required payments” *(Matter of Powers v Powers,*86 NY2d 63, 70 [1995]; *see*Family Ct Act § 454 [3] [a]; *Matter of Gorsky v Kessler,*79 AD3d 746 [2010]; *Matter of Brennan v Burger,*63 AD3d 922, 923 [2009]; *Yeager v Yeager,*38 AD3d 534 [2007]).

Here, the record sufficiently demonstrates that the mother was on public assistance, that she had been recently evicted from the apartment where she was living, and that she was unable to pay the amounts required by the child support order which had been entered, on her default, approximately six years earlier. Under these circumstances, the mother met her burden of establishing that she did not willfully violate the child support order. Accordingly, the Family Court should have denied the father’s petition to adjudicate the mother in willful violation of the prior child support order *(see Yeager v Yeager,*38 AD3d at 535; *Bisnoff v Bisnoff,*27 AD3d 606, 607 [2006]).

In light of our determination, we need not address the *715mother’s remaining contentions. Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2500 

To suspend temporarily the duty on p-fluorobenzaldehyde. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on p-fluorobenzaldehyde. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. P-FLUOROBENZALDEHYDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 p-Fluorobenzaldehyde (CAS 

No. 459–57–4) (provided for 

in subheading 2913.00.40) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2500 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - VI A (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General
Partner and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

       (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of the
              operations of the Partnership.



           November 17, 2008                    /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
           -----------------                    --------------------
                 Date                           Joseph M. Jayson,
                                                Individual General Partner and
                                                Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                           GARDENGBOTANIKA,AINC., INC.
                             CALCULATION OF EARNINGS
                     PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                                  (EXHIBIT 11)
                  (amounts in thousands except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                          FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                                                               -----------------------------------------
                                                               JANUARY 29,    JANUARY 30,    JANUARY 31,
                                                                  2000           1999           1998
                                                               -----------    -----------    -----------
<S>                                                            <C>            <C>            <C>
PRIMARY:
   Earnings --
      Net earnings (loss) applicable to common
        and common equivalent shares                            $(18,285)      $(48,034)      $(15,580)
                                                                ========       ========       ========

   Shares --
      Weighted average common shares outstanding                   7,069          7,069          7,069
      Net effect of stock options, based on treasury
        stock method using average market price(1)                    --             --             --

                                                                --------       --------       --------
      Weighted average common and common equivalent shares         7,069          7,069          7,069
                                                                ========       ========       ========

   Primary earnings (loss) per common and
      common equivalent share                                   $  (2.59)      $  (6.80)      $  (2.20)
                                                                ========       ========       ========
</TABLE>


FULLY DILUTED:

      Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share is not presented, as there were no
potentially dilutive securities.

NOTE:

(1)   In the calculation of weighted average common and common equivalent
      shares, nonqualified stock options and warrants to purchase common stock
      are considered common stock equivalents. Such options and warrants are
      converted using the treasury stock method, which assumes that the shares
      issuable upon exercise of the options or warrants were outstanding for the
      full period. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
      no common stock equivalents are shown as their effect would have been
      anti-dilutive for each period presented.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         471,747
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,309,927
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,463,533)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,572,469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,194
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     955,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,572,469
<SALES>                                        184,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               188,592
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                94,059
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              88,721
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,512
<INCOME-TAX>                                    50,512
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             50,512
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    50,512
<EPS-BASIC>                                       9.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.88


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements. (in thousands except earnings per
share)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,787
<SECURITIES>                                     9,545
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,684
<PP&E>                                             735
<DEPRECIATION>                                     125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,378
<BONDS>                                            610
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          7
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,972
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   929
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  69
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,748)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,748)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,748)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.95)
        

</TABLE>
The District Court of the 1st Judicial District. County of Lewis and Clark.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. KRISTOPHER JOSLIN, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. ADC-2002-269 DECISION

On January 27, 2010, the defendant was sentenced for violation of the *45conditions of a suspended sentence as follows: Count I: A commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of four (4) years, for the offense of Burglary, a felony; and Count II: A commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of four (4) years, for the offense of Theft, a felony. Counts I and II shall run concurrently with each other. The Court recommends the Defendant receive treatment in a Community Pre-Release Center or residential treatment center.

On May 6,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was advised of his right to be represented by counsel. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

It is the recommendation of the Sentence Review Division that the Department of Corrections review their classification of the defendant to give preference to the District Court’s intention that the Defendant be placed in an appropriate program, facility, or state correctional institution, with the recommendation that the defendant receive treatment in a community PreRelease center or residential treatment center unless there exists a paramount reason for a prison classification.

Done in open Court this 6th day of May, 2010.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

April 16, 2021

Order 

Clerk

April 16, 2021

161976(46)

MARIANNE HUFF and PERSON

CENTERED ADVOCACY SERVICES, 

LLC, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

SC: 161976

v COA: 349528

Ottawa CC: 18-005222-NZ

LYNNE DOYLE, STACY COLEMAN-AX, 

and JEFFREY L. BROWN,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

DOUGLAS VAN ESSEN, COMMUNITY 

MENTAL HEALTH OF OTTAWA COUNTY,

and THE LAKESHORE REGIONAL ENTITY,

Defendants.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee Doyle to extend the 

time for filing her answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer 

submitted on December 16, 2020, is accepted as timely filed.
Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

We, Lei Gu, Chief Executive Officer and Patrick Wong, Chief Financial Officer, of Zoom Technologies, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of our knowledge:

1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2014 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date: June 16, 2014

/s/ Lei Gu            
Lei Gu
Chief Executive Officer
and/s/ Patrick Wong
Patrick Wong
Chief Financial Officer

The material contained in Exhibit 32.0 is not deemed "filed" with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.

---
**Helicopter Module**

**For Agency Preparedness Review, you will need to have the following items available for review:**

**GENERAL HELIBASE INFORMATION**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**AERIAL IGNITION OPERATION**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**SUPERVISION**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**QUALIFICATIONS AND TRAINING**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

**COMPLETE CHECKLIST #21, VEHICLES**

Checklist #13 - Helicopter Module	1	Revised June 2021

# image1.png
**Agency Administrator**

**For Agency Preparedness Review, you will need to have the following items available for review:**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

Checklist #1 – Agency Administrator 	1	Revised June 2021

# image1.png