alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Please use this button to print

& submit via fax to

(202) 632-0045

National Indian Gaming Commission

St. Paul Region

Attendee Information

Name (First & Last) Position/Title

Business Street address City/State/Zip

Business E-mail address

**All fields are required**

NOTE: Please use a separate form for each attendee

Business contact phone number

*include area code - numbers only please

Entity registrant represents

Tribe Information

Ext.

If you do not represent a Tribe/Tribal Casino/Tribal Gaming

Commission entity, please enter agency name above.

Please use this button to submit

via E-mail (Outlook or Internet

based e-mail)

or

For further information or questions, please contact:

Tribe Name

Regulatory Review Consultation

Hyatt Regency

Milwaukee, WI

 June 13, 2011

Rita Homa

Executive Assistant

1441 L Street, N.W. Suite 9100

Washington, DC 20005

Phone: (202) 418-9807

Consultation Registration Form
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 108 (Monday, June 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13520]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date:  10 a.m. (Eastern Time) June 16, 2009.

Place:  4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20005.

Status:  Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Approval of the minutes of the May 18, 2009 Board member 
meeting.
    2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.
    a. Participant Activity Report.
    b. Investment Performance Report.
    c. Legislative Report.

Contact Person for More Information: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: June 4, 2009.
Thomas K. Emswiler,
Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. E9-13520 Filed 6-4-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
Te

 

CISA and FEMA opens application process for Tribal Cybersecurity Grant 

Program (TCGP)

 NIGC Tech Alert 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Office of Partnership and Engagement

Colleagues,

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) announced the opening of the application process for 

the Tribal Cybersecurity Grant Program (TCGP) to help tribal governments address

cybersecurity risks and threats. The cyber grant program, established by the State and

Local Cybersecurity Improvement Act as part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, helps 

address the unique challenges tribal governments face when defending against cyber

threats.

Digital threats impacting Native American and Alaska Native tribes are increasing and

becoming more complex. Tribal sovereignty creates unique cybersecurity challenges 

for these groups that often lack or can’t easily access resources needed to address

them.

Applicants have until January 10, 2024, to apply for a grant, which can be used to fund

new or existing cybersecurity programs. CISA encourages all eligible entities to apply

for grant funds to protect our critical infrastructure and communities from malicious

cyber activity.

For more information and helpful resources on the Tribal Cybersecurity Grant Program,

visit CISA’s http://www.cisa.gov/Cyber-Grants or FEMA’s webpage at Tribal Homeland 

Security Grant Program.

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

September 2023
Document

Exhibit 10.5

THIRD AMENDMENT 
TO 
AMENDED AND RESTATED EXHIBITOR SERVICES AGREEMENT


This Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Exhibitor Services Agreement (this “Amendment”), dated July 29, 2022 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), is by and between National CineMedia, LLC (“LLC”) and Regal Cinemas, Inc. (“Regal”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings given to them in the Amended and Restated Exhibitor Services Agreement between LLC and Regal, dated as of February 13, 2007 and amended and restated as of December 26, 2013 (the “ESA”).
WHEREAS, NCM and Regal desire to amend the ESA as provided in this Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of National CineMedia, Inc. (“NCM Parent”) and a special committee of members of the Board of Directors of NCM Parent have deemed this Amendment to be in the best interest of NCM Parent and its shareholders. 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and conditions set forth below, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


1.Termination Date of Post-Showtime Inventory and Post-Showtime Theatre Access Fees. The references to “August 1, 2022” and “November 1, 2022” in Section 9.02A of the ESA are deleted and replaced with “January 1, 2023” and “April 1, 2023,” respectively. 
2.Remaining Terms; Conflicts. Except as modified by this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the ESA shall remain in full force and effect. To the extent there is a conflict between the terms of the ESA and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall control.
Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page follows.











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have, by their respective duly authorized representatives, executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date.


									
	National CineMedia, LLC
By National CineMedia, Inc., its manager


/s/ Thomas Lesinski
		Regal Cinemas, Inc.




/s/ Renana Teperberg

	Signature		Signature
	Thomas F. Lesinski		Renana Teperberg
	Printed Name		Printed Name
	Chief Executive Officer		COO
	Title		Title






Signature Page to Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Exhibitor Services Agreement
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20320 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. NEMECIO RUBIO Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-239-3 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Nemecio Rubio has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rubio has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15I0216. PHILLIP WARREN et al. v. FRANK GLASSNER et al.

Phillip and Diane Warren seek immediate review of the denial of their motion

for summary judgment in a consolidated action concerning the validity of a will and

of payable-on-death (“POD”) beneficiary designations as to two certificates of

deposit (“CDs”). The dispute underlying this case began when Frank Glassner filed

a caveat to a will Phillip Warren offered for probate in the estate of Ledyne Merrily

Stanton. Glassner alleged that Stanton had lacked the requisite testamentary capacity

to create the will and that the will had been procured by undue influence. After the

probate court granted Warren’s petition to probate the will in solemn form, Glassner

appealed to the superior court and also filed a civil action alleging that Warren and

others had engaged in undue influence and tortious interference with his inheritance

rights. Glassner sought to set aside the will and the POD designations as to the CDs. 

Phillip and Diane Warren filed a declaratory judgment action seeking to uphold the

will and the POD designations. The parties agreed to consolidate all three pending

actions, the superior court denied the Warrens’ motion for summary judgment, and

this application for interlocutory review followed.

Our State constitution grants the Georgia Supreme Court jurisdiction over

appeals in “[a]ll cases involving wills.” Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III

(3). As the Supreme Court has explained, “‘all cases involving wills’ means those

cases in which the will’s validity or meaning is in question.” In re Estate of Lott, 251

Ga. 461 (306 SE2d 920) (1983). Here, by claiming that the decedent lacked the

requisite mental testamentary capacity and that the will was the product of undue

influence, Glassner is attacking the underlying validity of the will. See Lillard v.

June 23, 2015
Owens, 281 Ga. 619, 620-22 (1) (641 SE2d 511) (2007); McCormick v. Jeffers, 281

Ga. 264, 268 (4) (637 SE2d 666) (2006). This application is herebyTRANSFERRED

to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/23/2015
1

National Indian Gaming Commission

National Environmental Policy Act Record of Decision

Adoption of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs Final Environmental Impact 

Statement 

and 

Selection of Preferred Alternative: Approval of Gaming Management Agreement between 

the Spokane Tribe of Indians and WG-Airway Heights, LLC

January 5, 2018
Exhibit 23

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Anaren Inc.:

      We  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements (No.  33-36761,  No.  333-03193,  No. 333-70397,  No. 333-70427,  No.
333-50390, No. 333-50392, and No. 333-153382) on Form S-8 of Anaren, Inc. of our
reports  dated  September  15, 2008,  with respect to the  consolidated  balance
sheets of Anaren,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  as of June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the
related   consolidated   statements   of   income,   stockholders'   equity  and
comprehensive  income,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the three  year
period ended June 30,  2008,  and our report dated  September  15, 2008,  on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial  reporting as of June 30, 2008,
which reports  appear in the June 30, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Anaren,
Inc.

      Our report on the consolidated  financial statements refers to a change in
the  accounting  for  uncertain  tax  positions  in  2008,  and  changes  in the
accounting for defined benefit pensions and other postretirement  plans, and the
Company's  consideration  of  the  effects  of  prior  year  misstatements  when
quantifying misstatements in the current year financial statements, in 2007.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Syracuse, New York
September 15, 2008
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

CHAIR’S NOTICE – Chairman E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Visit www.NIGC.gov to learn more about the NIGC 3 For 35 Project— a 

year-long project emphasizing the importance of conversations among 

the tribal gaming regulatory community about workforce preparedness.

Today, September 14th, I had the opportunity to present the

National Indian Gaming Commission’s perspective on digital

wallet technology. The presentation was made to a large national

gathering of information technology and cyber security

professionals from across Indian country. I am grateful to

Executive Director Mike Day and the Tribal Hub community for its

leadership in Indian country, that’s led to regular gatherings

of subject matter experts around the important topics related to

technology and technology’s impact on tribal governance.

Over the last thirty years, Indian gaming‘s regulatory framework

has been a proven system to maintain a reputation for integrity

while allowing for innovation. My presentation today focused on

digital wallets as the latest frontier.

I gave an overview of existing NIGC regulatory requirements that

may be implicated with the adoption of new technology like

digital wallets. I also discussed public policy goals and

objectives tribal leadership has the opportunity to consider

when adopting new technologies such as digital wallets and

cashless systems.

Beyond economic opportunity, I discussed how new technology can

provide additional tools in achieving public policy goals in

areas such as financial crimes, age verification, and

responsible gaming. The dynamic between regulators and lawmakers

provides important and distinct responsibilities.

My presentation is attached below. Also, here is a link to an

interview I conducted after presenting at the Tribal Hub

conference in Reno, NV, where I discussed the importance of

cyber security in the Indian gaming community and highlighted

the important work of NIGC experts like IT Audit Manager Tim

Cotton.

I’m again grateful for the chance to discuss technology related

issues with an important gathering of Indian country

stakeholders in the technology and cyber security community.

###
Exhibit 32

                    ADVANCED FINANCIAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES




Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Chief Executive
Officer

     I, Charles A. Holtgraves, Chief Executive officer (Principal Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer), certify that this quarterly report on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ended (September 30, 2002) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and that the information contained herein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced
Financial Inc. and its subsidiaries for the periods presented.


Date: November 21, 2003                     /s/  Charles A. Holtgraves
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Charles A. Holtgraves
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Tiofani DIAZ HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-7069.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 6, 2006.

Jose Tiofani Diaz Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolph A. Renfer, Jr., Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*222Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jose Tiofani Diaz Hernandez appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Hernandez,*No. 5:03-cr-228-FL-ALL (E.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited Balance Sheet as of November 30, 2000 and the unaudited Statement
of Operations for the three months then ended and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     AUG-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                          NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                                    428,581
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                               2,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                               127,066
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          607,962
<PP&E>                                     40,713
<DEPRECIATION>                             27,827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            668,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   3,073,837
<BONDS>                                   600,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                3,326,230
<OTHER-SE>                             (6,331,653)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              668,414
<SALES>                                    37,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           37,220
<CGS>                                      16,758
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             373,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         48,368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (401,738)
<INCOME-TAX>                              206,767
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (194,971)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                             (194,971)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (0.01)


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adhemar W. RENUART, IV, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-1535.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 2, 2006.

Adhemar W. Renuart, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Farber, Randolph L. Hutter, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Adhemar W. Renuart, IV, appeals the district court’s order granting the motion of the United States to reduce federal tax assessments to judgment and to foreclose federal tax liens against real property owned, in part, by Renuart. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United*
      *181
      *States v. Renuart,*No. 1:04-cv-00460-JAB, 2006 WL 1686264 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


  Exhibit 27.  Financial Data Schedule


                                    ZOOM TELEPHONICS, INC.
                                          30-SEP-99

<ARTICLE>                                                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                                         USD


<S>                                                      <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                      1
<CASH>                                                       5,864,873
<SECURITIES>                                                 3,970,086
<RECEIVABLES>                                               10,025,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 4,878,606
<INVENTORY>                                                 11,316,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            35,712,876
<PP&E>                                                       4,072,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                             (4,208,732)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              44,312,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        6,593,918
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                    25,213,614
<OTHER-SE>                                                  11,870,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                44,312,260
<SALES>                                                     45,420,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            45,420,621
<CGS>                                                       28,410,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               19,341,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             (490,846)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (1,840,556)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 (530,991)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (1,309,565)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (1,309,565)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (.18)



</TABLE>