alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

# **CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**(pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C.§1350))**

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), theundersigned, Gordon Link, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofTapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to hisknowledge, that:

 

(a)                                  theAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2004 ofthe Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and

 

(b)                                 theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: February 23, 2005

 
|       | /s/ GORDON LINK                                        |       |
|------------|--------------------------------------------------------|------------|
|       | **Gordon Link**                                        |       |
| ** ** | **Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer** | ** ** |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TapestryPharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.  This certification“accompanies” the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Companyunder the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              14,448
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           55,356
<OTHER-SE>                                        (69,804)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            0
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .00
        


</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0006028

19-SEP-2014

09:01 AM
Exhibit        23.3

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52125)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Deferred
Compensation  and Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee  Directors,  in the
Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  2-95022)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc.  Amended Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees,  in the  Registration
Statement  (Form S-8 No. 33-7501)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Employee
Savings  Plan,  in the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  33-26101)
pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.   Long-Term   Incentive   Plan,  in  the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.  33-55922)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc. 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-49907) pertaining to the Ashland Inc. Leveraged Employee Stock Ownership
Plan, in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-62901)  pertaining to
the Ashland Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, in the Registration  Statement
(Form  S-8  No.  333-33617)  pertaining  to the  Ashland  Inc.  1997  Stock
Incentive Plan, in the Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No.  333-70651) as
amended by Amendment  No. 3,  pertaining to the U.S.  $220,000,000  Ashland
Inc. Medium-Term Notes, Series H of our report dated January 22, 1999, with
respect to the consolidated  financial  statements of Arch Coal, Inc. as of
and for the years ended  December 31, 1998 and 1997 included in this Annual
Report (on Form 10-K/A  Amendment No. 1) of Ashland Inc. for the year ended
September 30, 1998.

     Our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Arch Coal, Inc.
as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for the years then ended also included
the Arch Coal, Inc.  financial  statement  schedule included in this Annual
Report (on Form 10-K/A  Amendment No. 1) of Ashland Inc. for the year ended
September  30,  1998.  This  schedule is the  responsibility  of Arch Coal,
Inc.'s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule for 1998 and 1997,
when  considered  in  relation  to the  Arch  Coal,  Inc.  basic  financial
statements taken as a whole,  presents fairly in all material  respects the
information set forth therein.




                                                 Ernst & Young LLP

March  16, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2566 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2566

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,10-diaminodecane.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

 Mr. Alexander introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,10-diaminodecane.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,10-DIAMINODECANE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.02 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1,10-diaminodecane) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
MARK CHRISTIE GRIFFIS

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4215

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

-- Original

Jurisdiction

.

Mark Christie Griffis, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Resp ondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

ROWE, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  August 16, 2010 |  /s/ Joseph M. Jayson                 |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Date            |  Joseph M. Jayson,                                                                                                    |
|                  |  Individual General Partner,                                                                                          |
|                  |  Principal Executive Officer and                                                                                      |
|                  |  Principal Financial Officer                                                                                          |
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2935 

To clarify that the revocation of an alien’s visa or other documentation 

is not subject to judicial review. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 20, 2010 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To clarify that the revocation of an alien’s visa or other 

documentation is not subject to judicial review. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF VISA REVOCATION. 

4 Section 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act (8 U.S.C. 1201(i)) is amended by striking ‘‘There 

6 shall be no means of judicial review’’ and all that follows 

7 and inserting the following: ‘‘Notwithstanding any other 

8 provision of law, including section 2241 of title 28, United 

9 States Code, any other habeas corpus provision, and sec10 tions 1361 and 1651 of such title, a revocation under this 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2935 IS

1 subsection may not be reviewed by any court, and no court 

2 shall have jurisdiction to hear any claim arising from, or 

3 any challenge to, such a revocation.’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

5 The amendment made by section 1 shall— 

6 (1) take effect on the date of the enactment of 

7 this Act; and 

8 (2) apply to all visas issued before, on, or after 

9 such date. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
September 29, 2015
Via email and U.S. Mail

Mr. Brandon Meyer

In-House Counsel

Tuolomne Band of Me-Wuk Indians
Post Office Box 699

Tuolomne, California 95379

Re: _ Review of financing documents for the Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians

Dear Mr. Meyer:

This letter responds to the Tuolomne Band of Me-Wuk Indians’ request for the National
Indian Gaming Commission’s Office of General Counsel to review several agreements
pertaining to a proposed refinancing of the Band’s existing debt and new construction credit
facility. The Band requested an opinion as to whether these agreements are management
contracts requiring the NIGC Chair’s approval under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.' The
Tribe also requested an opinion as to whether the agreements violate IGRA’s requirement that a
tribe have the sole proprietary interest in its gaming operation.”

In my review, I considered the following submissions (collectively, “the Financing
Documents”) all unexecuted, but represented to be in substantially final form:

Credit Agreement, DW Draft dated 9/18/2015
Security Agreement, DW Draft dated 9/18/2015
Revolving Note, DW Draft dated 8/14/2015
Term Note, DW Draft dated 8/14/2015
Tax-Exempt Note, DW Draft dated 8/14/2015

The Financing Documents contain terms similar to other agreements the Office of
General Counsel has already reviewed and analyzed.’ Applying the same analysis here, it is my
opinion that the Financing Documents are not management contracts and do not require the
approval of the Chair. It is also my opinion that they do not violate IGRA’s sole proprietary
interest requirement.

"95 U.S.C. §§ 2711(a) and 2710(4)(9).
225 U.S.C. § 2710(b)(2)(A).
3 See www.nige.gov/Reading Room/Management_Review_Letters.aspx.

NEW MAILING ADDRESS: NIGC/DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop # 1621 Washington, DC 20240 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa OK; Oklahoma City, OK
WWW.NIGC.GOV


I understand that the Financing Documents are in substantially final form with respect to
terms affecting this opinion. If such terms change in any material way or are inconsistent with
assumptions made herein, this opinion shall not apply. Further, this opinion is limited to the
Financing Documents listed above. This opinion does not include or extend to any other
agreements.

I anticipate this letter will be posted to the NIGC’s website. Prior to posting, NIGC
Freedom of Information Act Office will notify you and give you an opportunity to identify and
request that information subject to the exemptions under FOIA be redacted or withheld. A list of
the FOIA exemptions may be found at 5 U.S.C. § 552(b).

If you have any questions, please contact NIGC Staff Attorney Andrew Mendoza at (202)
632-7003.

Moh Loe

Michael Hoenig
General Counsel
Exhibit 10.4




​
​
​
August 5, 2022
Via Electronic Mail
Bluerock Real Estate, L.L.C.
1345 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
New York, New York 10105
Attention: Michael Konig
Email: mkonig@bluerockre.com
Bluerock Real Estate Holdings, LLC
1345 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
New York, New York 10105
Attention: Michael Konig
Email: mkonig@bluerockre.com
		Re:
	Notice of Renewal of Administrative Services Agreement dated October 31, 2017 (the “Agreement”), by and between Bluerock Real Estate, L.L.C. (“BRRE”) and Bluerock Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“BREH,” and together with BRRE, the “Bluerock Entities”), and Bluerock Residential Growth REIT, Inc. (the “REIT”), Bluerock Residential Holdings, L.P. (the “OP”), Bluerock TRS Holdings, LLC (the “TRS”), and Bluerock REIT Operator, LLC (“REIT Operator,” and together with the REIT, the OP and the TRS, the “Company”).


Gentlemen:
The Company hereby notifies the Bluerock Entities that pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Agreement, the Company elects to renew the Agreement for an additional one-year term, to expire on October 31, 2023.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
/s/ Jordan B. Ruddy
Jordan B. Ruddy
Chief Operating Officer and President
Bluerock Residential Growth REIT, Inc.
Cc:R. Ramin Kamfar (via email)
#### George Heath, Appellant, v John S. Wojtowicz et al., Respondents.

Submitted May 24, 2010;

decided July 1, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
Exhibit 23.2 - Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52125)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Deferred
Compensation  and Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee  Directors,  in the
Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  2-95022)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc.  Amended Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees,  in the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-32612)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Employee
Savings  Plan,  in the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  33-26101)
pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.   Long-Term   Incentive   Plan,  in  the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.  33-55922)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc. 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-49907) pertaining to the Ashland Inc. Leveraged Employee Stock Ownership
Plan, in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-62901)  pertaining to
the Ashland Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, in the Registration  Statement
(Form  S-8  No.  333-33617)  pertaining  to the  Ashland  Inc.  1997  Stock
Incentive  Plan, in the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-3 No.  333-78675)
pertaining  to the  registration  of 68,925  shares of Ashland Inc.  Common
Stock, in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-36842) pertaining to
the  registration  of 96,600 shares of Ashland Inc.  Common  Stock,  in the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-8  No.  333-82830)   pertaining  to  the
registration  of  265,100  shares of  Ashland  Inc.  Common  Stock,  in the
Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-54766)  pertaining to the Amended
and Restated Ashland Inc. Incentive Plan, and in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-70651) pertaining to the offering of $600,000,000 of Debt
Securities,   Preferred  Stock,  Depository  Shares,  Common  Stock  and/or
Warrants of Ashland Inc., of our report dated  February 15, 2002,  relating
to the financial  statements of Marathon Ashland  Petroleum LLC included in
this  Annual  Report  (Form  10-K/A  Amendment  No.  1) for the year  ended
September 30, 2001.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Pittsburgh, PA

March 14, 2002
#### In the Matter of Norma Warrior, Respondent, v Robert E. Beatman, Sr., Appellant.

Submitted January 24, 2011;

decided March 29, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Judge Pigott taking no part.
#### Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London Subscribing to Policy Number SYN-1000263, Respondent, v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., et al., Appellants.

[975 NYS2d 870]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered March 26, 2012, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment declaring that it was not obligated to defend or indemnify defendants in the underlying estate proceeding, and on its cause of action for reimbursement of its defense costs, and order, same court and Justice, entered October 9, 2012, which, to the extent appealable, granted plaintiff’s motion to modify the order to include summary judgment on its supplemental complaint, and order and judgment (one paper), same court and Justice, entered March 13, 2013, awarding plaintiff the total sum of $166,968.90 in defense costs from defendants, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

A claim for the return of legal fees is not a claim for “dam*435ages” in a legal malpractice action, as defined in the professional liability policy issued by plaintiff to defendants *(see Shapiro v OneBeacon Ins. Co.,*34 AD3d 259, 260 [1st Dept 2006], *lv denied*9 NY3d 803 [2007]). In support of each of the causes of action, the complaint alleges only that defendants overbilled their client in the underlying estate proceeding; it does not allege facts tending to show that but for their negligence, they could have achieved a better result for him *(see Allstate Ins. Co. v Mugavero,*79 NY2d 153, 162-163 [1992]; *Barbara King Family Trust v Voluto Ventures LLC,*46 AD3d 423 [1st Dept 2007]). Moreover, plaintiff reserved its right to seek reimbursement of its defense costs in the event of a finding of no coverage *(see American Guar. & Liab. Ins. Co. v CNA Reins. Co.,*16 AD3d 154 [1st Dept 2005]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Renwick, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2690 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2690

  To reduce and modify the temporary suspension of duty on Iprodione.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reduce and modify the temporary suspension of duty on Iprodione.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IPRODIONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.51 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) by striking the article description and inserting 
        ``Products containing Iprodione (3-(3,5-dicholorophenyl)-N-(1-
        methylethyl)-2,4-dioxo-1-imidazolidinecarboxamide) (CAS No. 
        36734-19-7) and application adjuvants (provided for in 
        subheading 3808.92.15)'';
            (2) by striking ``2%'' and inserting ``2.4%''; and
            (3) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after January 1, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 13, 2014

No. 04-14-00145-CV

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP ESTATE OF MARIA I. RODRIGUEZ,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-PC-2639

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

O RDER

The court reporter’s notification of late record is GRANTED. The reporter’s record is due 

on May 23, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-4461) pertaining to (a) the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
(b) the 1996 Director Option Plan, (c) the 1996 Stock Option Plan, and (d) the
1988 Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 8, 1997, with respect to the
financial statements of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Tucson, Arizona
March 21, 1997