alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 903 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 903

   To provide for the correction of a certain John H. Chafee Coastal 
                     Barrier Resources System map.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2005

Mrs. Hutchison introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the correction of a certain John H. Chafee Coastal 
                     Barrier Resources System map.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTIONS TO JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall make any corrections 
to the map described in subsection (b) that are necessary to ensure 
that the map is consistent with the map entitled ``Corrections to 
Coastal Barrier Resources System Map Unit T-10'', dated June _____, 
2004, and on file with the Secretary and the Committee on Environment 
and Public Works of the Senate.
    (b) Map Described.--The map described in this subsection is the map 
that is subtitled ``Four Mile Hill Unit TX-16P, North Padre Island Unit 
T10/T10P'', which is included in the set of maps entitled ``Coastal 
Barrier Resources System'' and dated October 24, 1990.
    (c) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the map 
described in subsection (b) on file and available for public inspection 
in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 
(16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT KALVIN DEVON PRINGLE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-112 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed August 3, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Highlands County; Peter F. Estrada, Judge. Kalvin Devon Pringle, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. KHOUZAM, BLACK, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
#### Penguin Group (USA) Inc., Appellant, v American Buddha, Respondent.

Submitted January 10, 2011;

decided January 18, 2011

*See*609 F3d 30.

Motion by International Trademark Association for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on consideration of the certified question herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
NWCG Fire Training and Incident Qualifications

Employee Name:

IFPM Position:  Helicopter Manager

NWCG Incident Management Qualifications

Primary Core Requirement: Helibase Manager, Type 2 (HEB2)

Secondary Core Requirement: Incident Commander, Type 4 (ICT 4) 

The purpose of this form is to help identify required and developmental training for the 

NWCG Incident Management Qualification Standards for this position.  The required 

training includes the IFPM “Additional Required Training” and the required training for 

the Incident Command Positions (ICS) and/or the Wildland Fire Positions based on the 

2009 Wildland Fire Qualification System Guide (PMS 310‐1).  Employees should refer

to individual agency requirements.

Course

Number

Course Name Training  

Needed

Training

Completed

Estimated

Cost

Required Training     

S‐371  Helibase Manager       

S‐200  Initial Attack Incident Commander 

Type 4 

    

Suggested Developmental Training     

I‐300  Intermediate ICS       

S‐215  Fire Operations in the Urban 

Interface 

    

S‐234  Ignition Operations       

S‐260  Interagency Incident Business 

Management 

    

L‐380  Fireline Leadership
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 899 

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey certain land in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge and Kootenai National Forests, Montana, to Jefferson 

County and Sanders County, Montana, for use as cemeteries and other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2005 

Mr. BURNS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey certain 

land in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge and Kootenai National 

Forests, Montana, to Jefferson County and Sanders 

County, Montana, for use as cemeteries and other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Montana Cemetery Act 

5 of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 899 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE TO JEFFERSON COUNTY AND SAND2 ERS COUNTY, MONTANA. 

3 (a) CONVEYANCE.—Not later than 180 days after the 

4 date of enactment of this Act and subject to valid existing 

5 rights, the Secretary of Agriculture (referred to in this Act 

6 as the ‘‘Secretary’’), acting through the Chief of the For7 est Service, shall convey to Jefferson County, Montana, 

8 the Elkhorn Cemetery and to Sanders County, Montana, 

9 the Noxon Cemetery, for no consideration, all right, title, 

10 and interest of the United States in and to the parcels 

11 of land as described in subsection (b). 

12 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcels of land re13 ferred to in subsection (a) are the parcels of National For14 est System land (including any improvements on the land) 

15 known as— 

16 (1) the Elkhorn Cemetery, which consists of 10 

17 acres in Jefferson County located in SW1/4 Sec. 14, 

18 T. 6 N., R. 3 W.; and 

19 (2) the Noxon Cemetery, which consists of 3.4 

20 acres in Sanders County located in SE1/4, Sec. 24, 

21 T. 26 N., R. 33 W. 

22 (c) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 

23 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi24 tions for the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Sec-
3 

•S 899 IS

1 retary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the 

2 United States. 

Æ
[933 NE2d 207, 906 NYS2d 809]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James McRae, Appellant.

Decided July 1, 2010

*762APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*James McRae,*appellant pro se.

*Francis D. Phillips, II, District Attorney,*Goshen *(Elizabeth L. Guinup*and *Andrew R. Kass*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Because the accomplice testimony was corroborated with independent evidence as well as evidence that “harmonized” with the accomplice testimony, the evidence was legally sufficient to support defendant’s convictions *(see People v Reome,*15 NY3d 188, 194 [2010]). Next, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion when denying defendant’s eve-of-trial application to relieve his second court-appointed attorney and to appoint substitute counsel. Finally, defendant argues that the trial judge’s failure to properly instruct the jury on the affirmative defense to Penal Law § 160.15 (4) affected the entire verdict. This claim is unpreserved for our review.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

*763On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-88,508-01

EX PARTE BENJAMIN MARTINEZ HUERTA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR18465-A IN THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM WISE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual

assault of a child, and he was sentenced to forty years in prison.

Applicant alleges that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, rendering his guilty

plea involuntary, and he has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v.

Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App.

1999). There is no response from trial counsel in the record provided to this Court, and there are no

findings from the trial court. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex
-2-

parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate

forum for findings of fact. 

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective

assistance by explaining counsel’s representation of Applicant, including applicable strategy and

tactical decisions. To obtain the response, the trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the claims raised

in the writ application. The trial court may also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of

law it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court.

Filed: June 20, 2018

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited Balance Sheet as of February 28, 1998 and the unaudited 
Statement of Operations for the three months then ended and is qualified 
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                          3,858
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                    86,239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              101,603
<PP&E>                                         28,862
<DEPRECIATION>                                 24,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                979,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,173,170
<BONDS>                                       436,002
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    2,040,210
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,792,706)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  979,989
<SALES>                                           795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  795
<CGS>                                             317
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 310,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             57,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (367,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (367,439)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (367,439)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### The T. L. Wadsworth.

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

June 26, 1882.

Vessels and Boats—Lien for Supplies.

Where family supplies and hay and oats were furnished by a dealer in Buffalo on board a canal-boat lying up there for the winter, and the boat, having departed before the bills were paid and come into the eastern district of New Vork, was there libelled by the provision dealer, claiming a lien upon the boat as for maritime supplies, and it appeared on trial that the horses and man were employed at work on the streets of Buffalo, and that tie captain of the boat had not ordered the supplies, nor the woman who owned the boat, and whose husband was so at work on the streets with his horses, *held,*that the supplies were furnished on personal credit, and no lien on the boat arose out of the transaction.

*Beebe, Wilcox, & Hobbs,*for libelant.

*L. B. Stegman*and *E. G. Davis,*for respondent.

Benedict, D. J.

The libelant cannot recover in this action for two reasons: *First,*The supplies in question were not ordered by the captain or the owner of the boat, but by David Hulsapper, husband of the master, and he, with his horses, was then employed in working on the streets of Buffalo for a contractor. The articles sued for were purchased for the food of this man’s family, the food of his horses, and the food of a man hired to drive the horses in the streets of Buffalo during the time when David Hulsapper was so employed on the streets. They were not to enable the boat to earn freight, nor purchased for that purpose. No lien upon the boat arises out of provisions and stores furnished under such circumstances. In the *second*place, the bill sued for constitutes a part of an account of some $200, run up by David Hulsapper during the time he was working for the contractor upon the streets; and while it is no doubt true that these items were placed in a separate account and charged to the boat, the whole account was furnished with knowledge that the boat was not running, and that Hulsapper and his horses were working on the streets, and the attendant circumstances were such as to indicate with sufficient certainty that the articles sued for were furnished on the personal credit of David Hulsapper, as confessedly was the rest of the account.

The libel is therefore dismissed, and with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2704 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2704

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Orange 74.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Whitehouse (for himself and Mr. Reed) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Orange 74.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT ORANGE 74.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      2-                  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        Naphthalenecarbox                                                  31/2011.......
                        amide, N-(4-
                        chlorophenyl)-4-
                        [2-[2,5-dichloro-
                        4-
                        [(dimethylamino)s
                        ulfonyl]phenyl]di
                        azenyl]-3-hydroxy-
                         (CAS No. 85776-
                        14-3) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        3204.17.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF AMETEK, INC. AT DECEMBER 31, 1995, AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF AMETEK, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           7,011
<SECURITIES>                                     5,694
<RECEIVABLES>                                  125,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,373
<INVENTORY>                                    101,515
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               249,345
<PP&E>                                         408,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                 231,212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 526,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          210,676
<BONDS>                                        150,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           349
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   526,745
<SALES>                                        837,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               837,490
<CGS>                                          647,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  647,008
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,723
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 69,257
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,757
<DISCONTINUED>                                  11,199
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,676)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,280
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.14a

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Premium  Enterprises,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Virgil
Baker, CFO of the company,  certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Virgil Baker
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Virgil Baker, CFO

Dated:  5/19/03
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 289 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 289

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the taxable 
 income limit on percentage depletion for oil and natural gas produced 
                       from marginal properties.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 21, 2009

Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. Coburn) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the taxable 
 income limit on percentage depletion for oil and natural gas produced 
                       from marginal properties.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF TAXABLE INCOME LIMIT ON PERCENTAGE DEPLETION 
              FOR OIL AND NATURAL GAS PRODUCED FROM MARGINAL 
              PROPERTIES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (H) of section 613A(c)(6) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to oil and natural gas produced 
from marginal properties) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(H) Nonapplication of taxable income limit with 
                respect to marginal production.--The second sentence of 
                subsection (a) of section 613 shall not apply to so 
                much of the allowance for depletion as is determined 
                under subparagraph (A).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008.
                                 <all>
```