alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11763 and #11764]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-1840-DR), dated 05/27/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Tornadoes, and Straight-line Winds. *Incident Period:*
                         05/17/2009 and continuing.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         05/27/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/27/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/01/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 05/27/2009, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*
                     Volusia. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*( print page 26896) Florida: Brevard, Flagler, Lake, Marion, Orange, Putnam, Seminole. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere:
4.875Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere:
2.437Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere:
6.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere:
4.500Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere:
4.000For Economic Injury:Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere:
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 117636 and for economic injury is 117640. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Roger B. Garland, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E9-13034 Filed 6-3-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      218
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        432
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,833
<PP&E>                                          40,613
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,104)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,175
<COMMON>                                        42,070
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,329)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,166
<SALES>                                         76,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,691
<CGS>                                           21,107
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,509
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,001)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,001)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,001)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.36)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)
<FN>
<F1>
For Purposes of This Exhibit, Primary Means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S DECEMBER 31, 1997 AUDITED BALANCE SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT
AND CASH FLOW STATEMENT, AND NOTES THERETO, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   13,211,516
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,114,697
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,148,510
<OTHER-ASSETS>                               1,016,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,491,427
<COMMON>                                     2,266,027
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,831,377
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               4,097,404
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         5,662,000<F1>
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                           1,355,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  169,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               5,208,023
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               16,491,427
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    4,367,357
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            69,714
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   3,511,682
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   3,581,396
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        785,961
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             521,909
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               1,307,870
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       639,991
<NET-INCOME>                                   667,879
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  667,879
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       455,690
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      450,058
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         489,361
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
<FN>
<F1>See Note 4 to financial statements; includes long term note payable.
</FN>


</TABLE>
®
es
—— AN AristOCRAT COMPANY ——

November 13, 2017

Jonodev Osceola Chaudhuri, Chairman

Kathryn Isom-Clause, Vice Chair

E. Sequoyah Simermeyer, Associate Commissioner
National Indian Gaming Commission

90 K Street, NE, Suite 200

Washington, D.C. 20002

RE: Proposed rule — 25 CFR Part 547, Sunset Provision Elimination
Dear Commission:

VGT, an Aristocrat Company, is a developer and manufacturer of Class I] gaming systems that operate
pursuant to and in accordance with National Indian Gaming Commission's (NIGC) rules and regulations.
VGT is supportive of the NIGC proposed rule of 25 C.F.R. § 547.5, as published in the Federal Register
on September 28, 2017 that would amend the requirement that grandfathered systems meet the standard
adopted on September 14, 2012. We believe the current rule places an unfair burden on tribal operators
and it should be amended.

We work diligently with tribal regulators and at great expense to meet all requirements as set forth in the
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and NIGC regulations. NIGC technical standards have proven to be a
successful mechanism to raise the bar for Class Il gaming systems. All systems developed after 2008
meet current standards and there have been continual improvements to those grandfathered systems
since adoption of the 2008 technical standard.

VGT supports the proposed regulation change and applauds the Commission for recognizing the serious
implications to tribal reservation economic development that could occur if no action is taken. Please let
us know if we can provide additional supporting information.

Regards,

Jay Sevigny
President, Corporate

JS:Ipe

308 Mallory Station Road * Franklin, TN 37067 * 615.372.1000 * 615.372.1099 fax * www.vgt.net
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel—Health Disparities.                    

*Date:*                         June 25, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ruth Grossman, DDS, Scientific Review Officer, National Institutes of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 960, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8775,                         *grossmanrs@mail.nih.gov*.                    

Dated: May 26, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-12875 Filed 6-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Progressive Northeastern Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v State Farm Insurance Companies et al., Defendants, Gabe’s Auto, Appellant, and Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, Respondent.

Decided May 10, 2011

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (see CPLR 5601).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,734]


Meridian Automotive Systems, Plant 5, Grand Rapids, MI; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 2, 2009, in response to a petition 
filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Meridian Automotive 
Systems, Plant 5, Grand Rapids, Michigan. The workers at the subject 
facility produce injection molded plastic parts.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 8th day of May 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13448 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000332 19-MAY-2017 07:58 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2629 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2629

 To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on porcelain lamp-holder 
                      housings containing sockets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Gillibrand) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on porcelain lamp-holder 
                      housings containing sockets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PORCELAIN LAMP-HOLDER HOUSINGS CONTAINING SOCKETS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.30 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to porcelain lamp-holder 
housings containing sockets) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.3


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No.  333-54766)  pertaining  to the Amended and Restated  Ashland
Inc. Incentive Plan, in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52125)
pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Deferred  Compensation  and Stock Incentive
Plan for Non-Employee  Directors,  in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8
No.  2-95022)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Amended Stock Incentive Plan
for Key Employees,  in the  Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-32612)
pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Employee  Savings Plan, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-26101)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc. Long-Term
Incentive  Plan,  in the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  33-55922)
pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.  1993  Stock   Incentive  Plan,  in  the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No.  33-49907)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc. Leveraged Employee Stock Ownership Plan, in the Registration Statement
(Form  S-8  No.   33-62901)   pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.   Deferred
Compensation  Plan, in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-33617)
pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.  1997  Stock   Incentive  Plan,  in  the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-78675)   pertaining  to  the
registration  of  68,925  shares  of  Ashland  Inc.  Common  Stock,  in the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-36842)   pertaining  to  the
registration  of 96,600  shares of Ashland Inc.  Common  Stock,  and in the
Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-70651) pertaining to the offering
of $600,000,000 of Debt  Securities,  Preferred Stock,  Depository  Shares,
Common Stock and/or  Warrants of Ashland  Inc., of our report dated January
24, 2001,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements of Arch
Coal,  Inc.  as of December  31,  2000 and 1999,  and for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2000,  included in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K (as amended by Form  10-K/A,  Amendment  No.1) of Ashland Inc.
for the year ended September 30, 2000.

Our audits of the consolidated  financial  statements of Arch Coal, Inc. as
of  December  31,  2000 and 1999,  and for each of the  three  years in the
period ended December 31, 2000, also included the Arch Coal, Inc. financial
statement  schedule  included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K (as amended
by Form  10-K/A,  Amendment  No.  1) of  Ashland  Inc.  for the year  ended
September  30,  2000.  This  schedule is the  responsibility  of Arch Coal,
Inc.'s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion,  the financial statement schedule,  when considered
in relation to the Arch Coal,  Inc. basic financial  statements  taken as a
whole,  presents fairly in all material  respects the information set forth
therein.



                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 28, 2001
[/R]
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Peter A. Walker, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Union Security Insurance Company; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 20, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Cantoni, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 396]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Sullivan, J.), rendered January 7, 2011, convicting him of robbery in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly declined to suppress the proffered identification testimony. “A photographic display is suggestive when some characteristic of one picture draws the viewer’s attention to it, indicating that the police have made a particular selection” *(People v*Miller, 33 AD3d 728, 728-729 [2006]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the subjects depicted in the array were sufficiently similar in appearance, and there was no substantial likelihood that the defendant would be singled out for identification.

Upon consideration of the factors in *People v Taranovich*(37 NY2d 442, 445 [1975]), we find that the defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. Further, by pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his claim that his statutory right to a speedy trial was violated *(see People v O’Brien,*56 NY2d 1009 [1982]; *People v Burke,*90 AD3d 1246 [2011]; *People v Douglas,*46 AD3d 698 [2007]).

The defendant’s contention that his plea was not voluntary is unpreserved for appellate review because he did not seek to withdraw his plea or otherwise raise this issue before the Supreme Court (see *People v Bevins,*27 AD3d 572 [2006]). In any event, the defendant’s plea of guilty was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see *People v Garcia,*92 NY2d 869 [1998]; *People v Grant,*61 AD3d 177 [2009]).

*734The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.E, Lott, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.2

   CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-18945) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended, and the Amended and Restated Directors Stock Option Plan and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-90524) pertaining to the 2002 Stock
Option Plan of Redhook Ale Brewery, Incorporated of our report dated January 23,
2004, except for the fourth paragraph of note 1, as to which the date is July 1,
2004, with respect to the financial statements of Redhook Ale Brewery,
Incorporated as of December 31, 2003 and for each of the two years in the period
then ended included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2004.

                                                 Ernst & Young LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 29, 2005