27014 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 107 / Friday, June 5, 2009 / Notices 

II. Method of Collection 

Continuous ACS CRS—Cases that 

responded to production ACS from all 

three ACS response modes (mail, 

telephone, and personal visit) will be 

included. Reinterview modules 

containing a subset of the questions will 

be created so that the entire ACS 

questionnaire can be tested over several 

months. Each question set or module of 

the CRS will require multiple data 

collection months to provide enough 

sample for analysis purposes. 

Reinterviews will be conducted within 

2 to 4 weeks of the original data 

collection. It is important that the 

reinterview is close enough timing-wise 

to the original data collection to 

minimize the possibility of changes in 

what is being measured, but far enough 

away so respondents do not exactly 

remember previous responses. 

2010 Content Test—The field test 

portion of the ACS content test will be 

largely based on the data collection 

methods currently used in the 

production ACS. Sampled addresses 

will be mailed a pre-notice letter, a selfadministered paper questionnaire, and a 

reminder postcard. Households that do 

not return their initial questionnaire in 

a timely manner will also be mailed a 

replacement questionnaire. For 

households that do not return their 

mailed questionnaire, we will attempt to 

collect their data through Computer 

Assisted Telephone Interviewing or 

Computer Assisted Personal 

Interviewing. 

There will also be a Content Followup reinterview as part of the content 

test. That is, we will attempt a followup CATI reinterview with all 

households that responded in the field 

test and for whom we have a telephone 

number. This reinterview will focus on 

the particular questions that we are 

evaluating in the field test, and will not 

include every question asked in the 

original interview. 

Internet Test—Currently, the ACS and 

the Puerto Rico Community Survey 

(PRCS) collect data using three modes: 

mailout/mailback of a paper 

questionnaire, telephone, and personal 

visit. In the proposed test we will offer 

a fourth response mode—an Internet 

self-response option—to respondents in 

the ACS and the PRCS during the mail 

data collection phase. 

Different strategies will be used to 

inform respondents of the Internet 

response option. In all strategies, the 

URL for the secure ACS Internet site and 

instructions for completing the survey 

online will be provided to respondents 

by mail. 

The Census Bureau plans to design 

four versions of the ACS Internet 

instrument—an English version and a 

Spanish version for both the ACS and 

the PRCS. Households that do not 

respond by mail or Internet will be 

contacted for a telephone interview, 

similar to ACS production, since a voice 

message could encourage a household to 

respond by mail or Internet. This test 

will not include a personal visit 

operation like ACS production. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 0607–0936. 

Form Number: ACS–1, ACS1(SP), 

ACS–1(PR), ACS–1(PR)SP, ACS 

CATI(HU), and ACS RI(HU). 

Type of Review: Regular submission. 

Affected Public: Individuals and 

households. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

We plan to contact the following 

number of respondents: Content 

Reinterview Study, 71,520 responding 

addresses per year; 2010 Content Test, 

70,000 residential addresses during the 

field test and 40,000 responding 

addresses during the content follow-up 

conducted by telephone; Internet Test, 

90,000 residential addresses. Other 

potential content test: 70,000 residential 

addresses during the field test and 

40,000 responding addresses during the 

content follow-up conducted by 

telephone. Other potential test of new 

methods: 30,000 residential addresses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 

Estimates are: Content Test field test, 38 

minutes, content test follow-up, 15 

minutes; Internet Test, 38 minutes; 

Content Reinterview Study, 15 minutes; 

other potential test of new methods, 38 

minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 67,515. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost: Except 

for their time, there is no cost to 

respondents. 

Respondent Obligation: Mandatory. 

Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. 

Section 182. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: June 2, 2009. 

Glenna Mickelson, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. E9–13130 Filed 6–4–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–427–818] 

Notice of Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Reviews: Low 

Enriched Uranium From France 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 5, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Myrna Lobo or Justin Neuman, Office of 

AD/CVD Enforcement VI, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–2371 or (202) 482– 

0486, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 21, 2001, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the antidumping 

duty order on low enriched uranium 

from France. See Notice of Amended 

Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty 

Order: Low Enriched Uranium From 

France, 67 FR 6680 (February 13, 2002). 

On February 4, 2009, the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping order on low enriched 

uranium from France for the period of 

February 1, 2008 through January 31, 

2009. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 74 

FR 6013 (February 4, 2009). On 

February 19, 2009, USEC timely 

requested that the Department conduct 

an administrative review of Eurodif for 

the period of February 1, 2008 through 

January 31, 2009. USEC was the only 

party to request this administrative 


erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 107 / Friday, June 5, 2009 / Notices 27015 

1The Department had previously deferred the 

initiation of the reviews for the 05/06 and 07/08 

periods. See 71 FR 17077 (April 5, 2006) and 73 FR 

16837 (March 31, 2008). 

review. On March 24, 2009, the 

Department published a notice of 

initiation of the antidumping duty 

administrative review of low enriched 

uranium from France for the period 

February 1, 2008 through January 31, 

2009 (the seventh period of review). See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in 

Part, 74 FR 12310 (March 24, 2009). In 

that notice, the Department also 

initiated administrative reviews 

covering the periods February 1, 2005 

through January 31, 2006 (the fourth 

period of review), and February 1, 2007 

through January 31, 2008 (the sixth 

period of review).1 For the reasons 

discussed below, we are rescinding the 

administrative reviews. 

Rescission of Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if the parties 

that requested a review withdraw the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of the notice of initiation of 

the requested review. On May 15, 2009, 

USEC withdrew its request for the 

seventh administrative review. At the 

same time, USEC and Eurodif withdrew 

their requests for administrative review 

for the fourth and sixth administrative 

reviews. USEC and Eurodif withdrew 

their requests before the 90-day 

deadline, and no other party requested 

administrative reviews of the 

antidumping duty order on low 

enriched uranium from France for the 

periods discussed. Therefore, in 

response to the withdrawals, by USEC 

and Eurodif, of all requests for the three 

administrative reviews, and pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department 

rescinds the three administrative 

reviews of the antidumping duty order 

on low enriched uranium from France. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. For the companies 

for which this review is rescinded, the 

antidumping duties shall be assessed at 

rates equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department is 

currently barred from liquidating entries 

subject to the antidumping order on low 

enriched uranium from France by the 

injunction in place in Eurodif S.A. et al 

v. United States, Court No. 02–00219. 

When the Court of International Trade 

(CIT) issues final judgment and 

dismisses the case, the injunction will 

dissolve. The Department intends to 

issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CPB 15 days after 

notification by the CIT that the case has 

been dismissed. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protection orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. This 

notice is issued and published in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: May 29, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–13198 Filed 6–4–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–836] 

Certain Cut–to-Length Carbon–Quality 

Steel Plate from the Republic of Korea: 

Partial Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On March 24, 2009, in 

response to a request from interested 

parties, the Department of Commerce 

published a notice of initiation of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain cut– 

to-length carbon–quality steel plate from 

the Republic of Korea. The period of 

review is February 1, 2008, through 

January 31, 2009. The Department of 

Commerce is rescinding this review in 

part. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 5, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Yang Jin Chun or Richard Rimlinger, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5760 and (202) 

482–4477, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 24, 2009, in response to a 

request from interested parties, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain cut–to-length carbon–quality 

steel plate (CTL plate) from the Republic 

of Korea (Korea) for the period of review 

February 1, 2008, through January 31, 

2009. See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in 

Part, 74 FR 12310, 12312 (March 24, 

2009) (Initiation Notice). One of the 

companies included in the Initiation 

Notice was Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. 

(DSM). On April 8, 2009, DSM 

withdrew its request that we review its 

sales of subject merchandise from 

Korea. 

Rescission of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), the Department will 

rescind an administrative review in part 

‘‘if a party that requested the review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of notice of 

initiation of the requested review.’’ We 

received the letter withdrawing the 

request for the review of DSM within 

the 90–day time limit. The Department 

received no other requests for review of 

this company. In accordance with 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department is 

rescinding the review in part with 

respect to CTL plate from Korea 

produced and/or exported by DSM. The 

Department will issue appropriate 

assessment instructions to U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection 15 days after 

publication of this notice. 

Notification to Importer 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a 


erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES