alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations found on
pages 3 and 5 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         300,524
<SECURITIES>                                         0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                  324,062
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    184,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               832,476
<PP&E>                                       5,445,221
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,533,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,143,399
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           948
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,916,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,533,139
<SALES>                                      3,899,613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,899,613
<CGS>                                        2,084,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,084,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,791,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (209,414)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (132,466)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (132,466)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
#### Office of Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Taylor.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Taylor*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 312.]

(No. 96-2479

Submitted January 22, 1997

Decided April 30, 1997.)

*315
      *Geoffrey Stem,*Disciplinary Counsel, and *Loñ J. Brown,*Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

*James M. McCord,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

On review of the record, we adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year. Costs are taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton, J., not participating.
**Hand Crew/Non IHCChecklist #17**

**Hand Crew/Non-IHCChecklist #17**

For the National Preparedness Review you will need to have the following items available for review.

**17-1Revised 2010**

**17-7Revised 2010**
(November 20, 2013)

#### ADC Orange, Inc., Respondent, v Coyote Acres, Inc., Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 352]

— In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Marx, J.), dated February 29, 2012, which, upon a decision of the same court (McGuirk, J.), dated November 28, 2011, made after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it, directing specific performance of the contract.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

“In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, this Court’s power is as broad as that of the trial court, and it may render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account that in a close case the trial court had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses” *(BRK Props., Inc. v Wagner Ziv Plumbing & Heating Corp.,*89 AD3d 883, 884 [2011]; *see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford,*60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]). Here, the Supreme Court’s determination that the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance of the subject contract was warranted by the facts *(see ADC Orange, Inc. v Coyote Acres, Inc.,*7 NY3d 484 [2006]; *Cipriano v Glen Cove Lodge #1458, B.P.O.E.,*1 NY3d 53 [2003]; *Huntington Min. Holdings v Cottontail Plaza,*60 NY2d 997 [1983]; *Kooleraire Serv. & Installation Corp. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.,*28 NY2d 101, 106 [1971]). Thus, we decline to disturb the Supreme Court’s determination. Dillon, J.R, Angiolillo, Dickerson and Cohen, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 300 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 300

To enable the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information of 
the Department of Commerce to resume timely processing and distribution 
of TV converter box coupons by increasing its fiscal authority to make 
                   payments, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2009

   Mr. Gregg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To enable the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information of 
the Department of Commerce to resume timely processing and distribution 
of TV converter box coupons by increasing its fiscal authority to make 
                   payments, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TV Converter Box Coupon Program 
Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY OF NTIA TO ISSUE TV CONVERTER BOX COUPONS.

    Section 3005 of the Digital Television Transition and Public Safety 
Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-171; 120 Stat. 23) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(e) Authority To Access Additional Amounts From Digital 
Television Transition and Public Safety Fund.--Notwithstanding any 
other provision of law and in addition to any amounts permitted to be 
used by this section prior to the date of enactment of the TV Converter 
Box Coupon Program Relief Act, the Assistant Secretary may make 
payments of not to exceed $250,000,000 from the Digital Television 
Transition and Public Safety Fund--
            ``(1) to continue to carry out the digital-to-analog 
        converter box coupon program established under this section; 
        and
            ``(2) to cover administrative expenses of the program.''.
                                 <all>
```
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
I, John L. Threshie Jr., CEO of The Tirex Corporation (the "Company") dohereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 
-  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the  period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

/s/________________ John L. Threshie Jr., CEO 

Date: May 12, 2005
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We have issuedour report dated December 23, 2010, accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-40606 and No. 333-124425) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-57080, 333-156381,333-158984 and 333-161918). 

Stegman and Company 

Baltimore, Maryland 

December 23, 2010
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**§906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the filing with Securities and Exchange Commission of the
      Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-KSB
      for the period ending September 30, 2006, (the “Report”), I, William P. Hales,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
      my knowledge:




**1.**
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




**2.**
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
      William P. Hales_____________


William
      P. Hales


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)




January
      29, 2007




-19-
Presidential Documents

25385 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 101 

Thursday, May 28, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2009–18 of May 19, 2009 

Proposed Agreement for Cooperation Between the Government of the United States of America And the Government 

of the United Arab Emirates Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Energy 

I have considered the proposed Agreement for Cooperation Between the 

Government of the United States of America and the Government of the 

United Arab Emirates Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, along 

with the views, recommendations, and statements of the interested agencies. 

I have determined that the performance of the Agreement will promote, 

and will not constitute an unreasonable risk to, the common defense and 

security. Pursuant to section 123 b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 

as amended (42 U.S.C. 2153(b)), I hereby approve the proposed Agreement 

and authorize the Secretary of State to arrange for its execution. 

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, May 19, 2009 

[FR Doc. E9–12582 

Filed 5–27–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


OB#1.EPS</GPH>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul F. Atkinson, Also Known as Paul Francis Atkinson, Also Known as Paul Atkinson, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 884]

*1350Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered December 20, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of arson in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of arson in the second degree (Penal Law § 150.15), defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because defense counsel failed to seek suppression of tangible evidence and his statement to the police and to advise him of certain rights forfeited as a consequence of his plea. That contention survives his guilty plea only insofar as he asserts that “the plea bargaining process was infected by [the] allegedly ineffective assistance or that defendant entered the plea because of his attorney[’s] allegedly poor performance” *(People v Robinson,*39 AD3d 1266, 1267 [2007], *lv denied*9 NY3d 869 [2007] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see People v Culver,*94 AD3d 1427, 1427-1428 [2012], *lv denied*19 NY3d 1025 [2012]; *People v Bethune,*21 AD3d 1316, 1316 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 752 [2005]; *see also People v Strickland,*103 AD3d 1178 [2013]). Defendant’s contention with respect to ineffective assistance of counsel, however, concerns matters outside the record and thus must be raised by way of a motion pursuant to CPL article 440 *(see Strickland,*103 AD3d at 1178; *see also People v Williams,*48 AD3d 1108, 1109 [2008], *lv denied*10 NY3d 872 [2008]). The further contention of defendant that his plea was not knowingly, intelligently or voluntarily entered is not preserved for our review because defendant failed to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction on that ground *(see People v Montanez,*89 AD3d 1409, 1409 [2011]; *People v Connolly,*70 AD3d 1510, 1511 [2010], *lv denied*14 NY3d 886 [2010]). In any event, we conclude that defendant understood the nature and consequences of the plea and that it was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered *(see People v White,*85 AD3d 1493, 1494 [2011]; *People v Watkins,*77 AD3d 1403, 1403-1404 [2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 956 [2010]). Defendant’s contention that he was not credited for jail time that he served before entering his plea is not properly raised on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction and instead the proper procedural vehicle is a CPLR article 78 proceeding *(see People v Person,*256 AD2d 1232, 1232-1233 [1998], *lv denied*93 NY2d 856 [1999]; *People v Searor,*163 AD2d 824, 824 [1990], *lv denied*76 NY2d 896 [1990]). Finally, under the circumstances here, the *1351sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Present—Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Carni, Valentino and Martoche, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of Synergx  Systems  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John A. Poserina, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                             /s/ John A. Poserina
                                             ----------------------------
                                             John A, Poserina
                                             Chief Financial  Officer
                                             Synergx Systems Inc.
                                             May 10, 2004
#### Bill FRAZIER and Kathy Frazier (doing business as Yacht Basin Marina), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-5175.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 9, 2006.

Before SCHALL, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

*Judgment*

PER CURIAM

*This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:*

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
**Dozer/Tractor Plow (2024)**

**Checklist #18**

**DOZER/TRACTOR PLOW DATA**

**TRANSPORT/TRAILER DATA**

**For the National Preparedness Review, you will need to have the following items available for review:**

**TRACTOR AND TRAILER**

***Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed***

**DOZER**

***Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed***

**QUALIFICATIONS AND TRAINING**

***Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed***

**PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE)**

***Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed***

**COMPLETE CHECKLIST #19, VEHICLES**

**COMPLETE CHECKLIST #20, FUEL TRANSPORT**

Dozer/Tractor Plow	1	Revised April 2024

# image1.png
Exhibit 10.1
​

GENERATION BIO CO.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Program
Under Generation Bio Co.’s (the “Company”) non-employee director compensation program, the Company pays its non-employee directors an annual fee. Each non-employee director receives an annual fee for service on the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) and for service on each committee on which the director is a member, as well as additional fees for service as chairman of the Board or chairman of each committee. These fees are payable in arrears in four equal quarterly installments on the last day of each quarter, provided that the amount of such payment shall be prorated for any portion of such quarter that the director was not serving on the Board, and are as follows:
​
		Member Annual Fee
	Chairman Additional Annual
Fee

	Board of Directors
	$40,000
	$30,000

	Audit Committee
	$7,500
	$7,500

	Talent Committee
	$7,500
	$7,500

	Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee
	$4,000
	$4,000



​
The Company also reimburses its non-employee directors for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred in connection with attending its Board and committee meetings. 
In addition, under the Company’s non-employee director compensation program, each non-employee director receives, upon his or her initial election to the Board, an automatic grant of a stock option under the Company’s 2020 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2020 Plan”) to purchase 38,400 shares of the Company’s common stock. Subject to the non-employee director’s continued service as a director, the option will vest with respect to 1/36 of the shares at the end of each successive month following the grant date until the third anniversary of the grant date.
Each non-employee director who has served on the Board for at least six months as of an annual meeting of stockholders will receive an automatic grant of a stock option under the 2020 Plan to purchase 19,200 shares of the Common Stock on the date of each such annual meeting of stockholders. Unless otherwise provided at the time of grant, subject to the non-employee director’s continued service as a director, the option will vest with respect to 100% of the shares on the earlier of the first anniversary of the grant date and the date of the annual meeting of stockholders in the year immediately following the year in which the option was granted. 
All options issued to the Company’s non-employee directors under its non-employee director compensation program will become exercisable in full upon a change in control of the Company. The exercise price of these options will be equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant as reported on The Nasdaq Global Select Market.
Effective April 18, 2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

IAN PISARCHUK,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 10 MAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

IAN PISARCHUK,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 11 MAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of May, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Hadera Paper Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Ofer Bloch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:




(1)                The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:           April 10, 2011                                                                                     /s/ Ofer Bloch


Ofer Bloch


ChiefExecutive Officer
##### 



FORM OF CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT




---



##### 



CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
        Operation and Term of Agreement.




---



##### 



Certain Definitions.
   -2-




---



##### 



-3-




---



##### 



Vesting Upon Change in Control.
 Benefits Upon Termination Within a Protection Period.
 -4-




---



##### 



Executives Right to Leave Employment.
   Non-exclusivity of Rights.
 -5-




---



##### 



Full Settlement; No Obligation to Seek Other Employment; Legal Expenses.
 Cut Back in Benefits.
 Code Section 409A Savings Provision.
 -6-




---



##### 



Confidential Information.
 Successors.
  -7-




---



##### 



Notice of Termination.
 Requirements and Benefits if Executive Is Employee of Subsidiary of Company.
 Miscellaneous.
   -8-




---



##### 



INFINITY ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.By:Name:Title:EXECUTIVE
 -9-
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 24 (Friday, February 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 6331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2532]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Physics; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: LIGO Science Education Center Partnership (SUBR), Proposal 
Review Panel for Physics, <greek-i>1208.
    Date and Time: Thursday, February 19, 2009; 8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
    Friday, February 20, 2009; 8 a.m.-4 p.m.
    Place: Southern University of Baton Rouge, Louisiana and LIGO 
Livingston, Louisiana.
    Type of Meeting: Partially Closed.
    Contact Person: Kathleen McCloud, Program Director, Division of 
Physic, National Science Foundation (703) 292-8236.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide an evaluation concerning the 
proposal submitted to the National Science Foundation.

Tentative Agenda

Thursday, February 19, 2009

8:30 a.m.-11 a.m. Closed--Executive Session, Overview by LIGO-SUBR 
staff.
11 a.m.-1:30 p.m. Open--tour of LIGO Education Center and Lunch.
1:30 p.m.-2 p.m. Travel to SUBR.
2:30 p.m.-5:30 p.m. Closed--Executive Session.

Friday, February 20, 2009

8 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed--Executive Session.
9 a.m.-10:30 a.m. Open--tour of SUBR facilities.
11 a.m.-4 p.m. Closed--Executive Session with LIGO and SUBR, Close 
out.
    Reason for Closing: The proposal contains proprietary or 
confidential material, including technical information on personnel. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2)(4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 3, 2009.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-2532 Filed 2-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
No. 902.

#### Barker *v.*Levin, Trustee in Bankruptcy.

March 2, 1942.

*Mr. Luke E. Hart*for petitioner. *Mr. Morris J. Levin*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.