alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Lavi A. Lev, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)    the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:     January 11, 2007



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/S/    LAVI A.
LEV                               
|Lavi A. Lev President and Chief Executive Officer
Supreme Court of Florida

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2024

In Re: Amendment to Florida 

Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280

SC2021-0929

The Attorney General’s motion for rehearing is hereby denied.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and 

SASSO, JJ., concur.

LABARGA, J., specially concurs with an opinion.

LABARGA, J., specially concurring.

Because the existing Florida Rules of Civil Procedure were 

sufficient to address abusive discovery tactics, I dissented to the 

adoption of new rule 1.280(h), which extended the apex doctrine to 

the private sector. In re Amend. to Fla. Rule of Civ. Proc. 1.280, 324 

So. 3d 459, 464-67 (Fla. 2021) (Labarga, J., dissenting).

While I adhere to my dissent in that case as well as my dissent 

to this Court’s order allowing the new rule to remain as originally 

adopted, I agree that the standard for rehearing has not been met in 

this matter. Thus, I concur in the denial of rehearing.
CASE NO.: SC2021-0929

Page Two

A True Copy

Test:

SC2021-0929 02/08/2024

SC2021-0929 02/08/2024

SO

Served:

JOSHUA E. DOYLE

HEATHER S. TELFER

JENNIFER MARIE VOSS

CHRISTOPHER J. BAUM

JUDSON LEE COHEN

WILLIAM W. LARGE

HON. ASHLEY MOODY

FRANK CRUZ-ALVAREZ

ROBERT L. CHRISTIE

HENRY C. WHITAKER

KANSAS R. GOODEN

DANIEL B. ROGERS

DANIEL W. BELL

CHRISTOPHER G. BURNS

JOHN W. HOGAN
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6962

ANTHONY HOLLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusLONNIE M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-327-R) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Holley, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Anthony Holley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record andthe district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Holley v Saunders , No. CA-98-327-R (W.D. Va. June 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2666 

To extend the suspension of duty on cyprodinil. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on cyprodinil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYPRODINIL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.08 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 cyprodinil) is amended by striking the date in the effective 

7 period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                    SUBSIDIARIES OF STERLING BANCSHARES, INC.

The following is a list of the subsidiaries of Sterling Bancshares, Inc.:

Sterling Bancorporation, Inc.
A Delaware corporation
PO Box 631
Wilmington, Delaware 19899

Sterling Bancshares Capital Trust I
A Delaware statutory business trust
15000 Northwest Freeway
Houston, Texas 77040

Sterling Bank
A Texas state banking association
15000 Northwest Freeway
Houston, Texas 77040

CMCR Holding Company
A Delaware corporation
13100 Northwest Freeway
Houston, Texas 77040

CMCR Holding Company is the parent company of Sterling Capital Mortgage Company,
an originator and servicer of one-to-four single family residential mortgage
loans. Sterling Capital Mortgage Company originates a significant portion of its
mortgage business through twenty-five subsidiary entities.
#### Willie Lee MAXWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sam SALEH, County Court Judge, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-10707.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 2006.

Willie Lee Maxwell, Amarillo, TX, pro se.

*478Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Willie Lee Maxwell, Texas inmate # 1163609, appeals the dismissal as, frivolous and for failure to state a claim of his in forma pauperis (IFP) 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Maxwell sued Sam Saleh to recover the retainer paid to him to act as defense counsel for Maxwell and his wife; after the payment, Saleh allegedly informed them that he could no longer represent them because he had been elected judge. Maxwell argues that the district court abused its discretion by not notifying him of his complaint’s deficiencies and providing an opportunity to amend. He also argues that his suit was not untimely. He further asserts that the actions of Saleh, and others, were under color of state law.

Attorneys do not act under color of state law when they perform a lawyer’s traditional function as defense counsel in a criminal proceeding. *See Polk County v. Dodson,*454 U.S. 312, 325, 102 S.Ct. 445, 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981). Thus, we need not address Maxwell’s contentions that his § 1983 complaint was timely because, even if the complaint is timely, Saleh is not a state actor for § 1983 purposes. Maxwell has shown no error in the district court’s dismissal of his complaint without affording him an opportunity to amend. *See Jones v. Greninger,*188 F.3d 322, 326-27 (5th Cir.1999).

Maxwell’s appeal lacks arguable merit and is dismissed as frivolous. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2; *Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983). The dismissal of this appeal and the dismissal by the district court count as two strikes for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). *See Adepegba v. Hammons,*103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir.1996). Maxwell is cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes, he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*§ 1915(g). Maxwell’s motion for production of documents is denied.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED; MOTION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

955 CAF 11-01931 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF NINA E. HAWTHORNE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JASON L. HALL, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
CHARLES J. GREENBERG, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
COURTNEY S. RADICK, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, OSWEGO, FOR DECEMBER R.H.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Bobette J. Morin, R.), entered August 25, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition for modification of custody and visitation. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same Memorandum as in Hall v Hawthorne ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Oct. 5, 2012]).

Entered: October 5, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT
23.01





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Forms
S-3 (Registration No.'s 333-1314, 333-15959) and Forms S-8 (Registration No.'s
333-1136, 333-1138) of Sandston Corporation of our report dated March 25, 2010
on the financial statements of Sandston Corporation as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Sandston Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/ Plante & Moran,
  PLLCAuburn
      Hills, MichiganMarch
      25, 2010
Media Advisory Media Contact: Kim Myers

(202) 632-7003

Press Conference: 30 years in the making – NIGC to announce 2016

gross gaming revenues 

WASHINGTON, July 11, 2017 –National Indian Gaming Commission invites the public, media 

and Tribes to attend a press conference on July 17th at 1:00 p.m. EST. The Commission will 

announce 2016 gross gaming revenues for the Indian gaming industry. Indian gaming continues

to be a catalyst for economic development, self-determination, and self-sufficiency in Indian 

country and is conducted in accordance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act for 499 Indian 

gaming establishments operated by 245 federally recognized gaming tribes across 28 States. 

WHO: NIGC Chair Jonodev O. Chaudhuri 

NIGC Vice Chair Kathryn Isom-Clause 

NIGC Associate Commissioner E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

WHAT: The National Indian Gaming Commission will conduct a press conference

announcing the 2016 gross gaming revenues of Indian gaming operations in the

United States.

WHEN: Monday, July 17, 2017, 1:00 p.m. EST.

ACCESS In person attendance:

OPTIONS: National Indian Gaming Commission

90 K Street NE, Suite 200

Washington, D.C. 20002 

NOTE: Media wishing to attend live MUST RSVP by Friday, July 14th by 4:30 

p.m. EST to Vannice Doulou at Vannice_Doulou@nigc.gov or 202-632-0296. 

Adobe Connect Information: https://nigc.adobeconnect.com/rlgphxrqjy4e

Telephone conference line: 888-469-1984/ Participant pass code: 9670115

NOTES: News release, charts, and graphics will be available for download through the 

Adobe Connect conference room during the announcement. For those unable to 

attend, the press conference will be recorded and available along with news

release, charts, and graphics on the NIGC website after 4:00 p.m. EST.

To learn more, visit www.nigc.gov and follow us on Facebook and Twitter. 

### 

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act created the National Indian Gaming Commission to support tribal self-sufficiency and the 

integrity of Indian gaming. The NIGC has developed four initiatives to support its mission including (1) To protect against anything 

that amounts to gamesmanship on the backs of tribes; (2) To stay ahead of the Technology Curve; (3) Rural outreach; and (4) To 

maintain a strong workforce within NIGC and with its tribal regulatory partners. The Commission’s dedication to compliance with 

the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act ensures the integrity of the Indian gaming industry. To learn more, visit www.nigc.gov and 

follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE DATA IN THIS SCHEDULE ARE EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S AUDITED 1995
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ARE QUALIFIED IN THEIR ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000007610
<NAME> ARTISTIC GREETINGS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             529
<SECURITIES>                                     2,579
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                       113
<INVENTORY>                                      5,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,803
<PP&E>                                          16,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,998
<BONDS>                                          9,593
<COMMON>                                           604
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,654
<SALES>                                         97,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,042
<CGS>                                           42,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (385)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (881)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,662)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,710)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,952)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,952)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2784

_____________________________
E DWARD B AKER E MAN ,
Petitioner
,

v.

D EPARTMENT O F H IGHWAY S AFETY A ND M OTOR V EHICLES , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

– Original Jurisdiction.

February 6, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ENIED

.
W ETHERELL , R AY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 David M. Robbins and Susan Z. Cohen of Epstein & Robbins, Jacksonville
, for Petitioner

.
Christie S. Utt , General Counsel, Tallahassee, and Jason Helfant, Senior Assistant General Counsel, Lake Worth, Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles
, for Respondent

.
-  Home 
        -  Research & Funding 
        -  Current Funding Opportunities 
        -  HEAL Initiative: Studies to Enable Analgesic Discovery (R61/R33 - Clinical Trial Not Allowed) 

View Current Funding Opportunities

# HEAL Initiative: Studies to Enable Analgesic Discovery (R61/R33 - Clinical Trial Not Allowed)

This notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) aims to encourage research grant applications for initial translational efforts that will enable a drug discovery program for novel, non-opioid, and non-addictive treatments for pain. The program provides funding to develop and validate assays to support a distinct testing funnel and conduct screening efforts to identify and characterize potential therapeutic agents including small molecules, biologics, and natural products. Preliminary in vivo pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy studies may also be supported. The goal of this NOFO is to advance projects to the point where they meet the entry criteria for the Pain Therapeutics Development Program or other later-stage translational programs.

### Funding Opportunity Details

Full Announcement:RFA-NS-25-012Related Notices or Announcements:                None            

Program Contact:Dana K Andersen, MD

### Key Dates

Open Date:            5/18/2024        

Letter of Intent Due Date:            30 days prior to the application due date
Exhibit
32(b)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Power Company (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Holly Keller
Koeppel, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Holly Keller
Koeppel___________


Holly
Keller Koeppel


Chief
Financial Officer








February
27, 2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
NATIONAL INTERAGENCY FIRE CENTER

CASUAL PAYMENT CENTER

3833 S DEVELOPMENT AVE, BOISE, ID 83705-5354

PHONE: 877-471-2262 FAX: 208-433-6405

EMAIL: CASUALPAY@BLM.GOV

.......................................................................................................................................

 

 

For office use only:

Faxed to IBC: Date______ Initials______ 

STATE TAX CORRECTION FORM 

Check one: BIA BLM FWS NPS 

NAME: SSN: 

.......................................................................................................................................

For Modifying Current Year Wages and State Taxes

It is required that casuals be taxed out of their Hired At state (unless there is a reciprocal agreement in place). If 

while working as a casual you were being taxed by an additional (non-Hired At) state, you may request that 

these wages be transferred to the correct (Hired At) state. 

If wages have been reported and taxes have been paid to an incorrect state and you would like your wages 

and taxes transferred to the correct state, please indicate the change below: 

 Transfer my earned wages and paid taxes from (incorrect state) to 

 (correct state) for wages earned and taxes paid between dates 

 and . 

By checking here I am also requesting that my incorrect state be removed from your system.

State taxes were taken for the incorrect state listed above and my correct state does not withhold state taxes. By 

checking here I am requesting the money be paid to me. (This request can only be done if your correct state does 

not require state taxes to be paid to them.)

.......................................................................................................................................

SIGNATURE: DATE: PHONE #: 

Privacy Act Statement: Information on this form is collected under the authority of the Administratively Determined (AD) Pay Plan. Information collected via this form is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974 and Privacy 

Act System of Records Notice DOI-85. The primary use of this information is to start, stop, or change entitlements and to process any voluntary or involuntary deductions on pay and leave issues. The information you 

furnish will be used to identify records properly associated with you, to obtain additional information to update your record, if necessary, and to determine any present or future entitlement. Disclosure may be made only 

to authorized persons according to Title 5 USC 552a and for uses described in System of Records Notices DOI-85. Submission of the information in this form is voluntary; however, requests will not be completed 

without the information needed to process the request. 

Revised 01/2022
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 97-20126 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE J. GRAJALES, Defendant, AMIN A. RASHID, As Assignee for Jose Grajales, Movant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-91-CR-211-2

- - - - - - - - - - April 20, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Federal prisoner Amin A. Rashid, # 30591-066, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1),(3) and the denial of his motion to reopen the time for appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This court reviews a district court’s decision denying relief under Rule 60(b) for abuse of discretion. Travelers Ins. Co. v.No. 97-20126 -2- Liljeberg Enter. Inc. , 38 F.3d 1404, 1408 (5th Cir. 1994). Because Rashid has failed to establish standing to challenge the forfeiture of the currency, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying his Rule 60(b) motion. See United States v. $321,470 U.S. Currency , 874 F.2d 298, 303 (5th Cir. 1989). The court need not address Rashid’s remaining arguments in his brief because he has no standing to sue. Rashid’s motion to strike the Government’s brief and motion to file a supplemental appendix are DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Toby Lynn Williams

No. 06-24-00001-CR

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Stevens, Justice van Cleef and 

Justice Rambin participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition.

RENDERED JANUARY 23, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk