alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John C. Batty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)    the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:    January 11, 2007



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/    JOHN C.
BATTY                 
|John C. Batty Chief Financial Officer
#### Michael T. Schmidt, Appellant, v Josephine M. Schmidt, Respondent.

[961 NYS2d 793]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.H.O.), entered July 28, 2011, which, upon a decision of the same court dated November 29, 2010, made after a *728nonjury trial, inter alia, equitably distributed the marital property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in permitting the defendant, at trial, to present certain testimony and evidence relating to financial issues.

Moreover, the Supreme Court properly calculated the defendant’s share of the appreciation in the value of the marital residence over the course of the marriage *(see Jones v Jones,*92 AD3d 845, 847 [2012]; *Mongelli v Mongelli,*68 AD3d 1070, 1072 [2009]; *Kilkenny v Kilkenny,*54 AD3d 816, 818-819 [2008]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Mastro, J.E, Rivera, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-92883) pertaining to the registration of the 1998
Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-16707 and No. 333-37758) pertaining to the registration of the 1996 Stock
Option Plan, 1996 Director Option Plan, 1988 Stock Option Plan, and 1996
Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. of our report
dated January 25, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2000.

   Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Ventana
Medical Systems, Inc. listed in Item 14(2). This schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement
schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 29, 2001
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6815
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CAROLYN LEE PATTERSON, a/k/a Crystal's Mother, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-88-76-N, CA-95-1134-2) Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 19, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carolyn Lee Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no revers ible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Patterson , Nos. CR-88-76-N; CA-95-1134-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 1996). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2753 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on RSD 1235. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2009 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on RSD 1235. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RSD 1235. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.93 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 RSD 1235) is amended by striking the date in the effec7 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Warren Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), we, Norman F. Swanton and Timothy A. Larkin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge:

(1)   The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

| |  | March 15, 2004                                                                          
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Norman F. SwantonNorman F. Swanton
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer             
| |  | /s/ Timothy A. LarkinTimothy A. Larkin
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128352 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. THOMAS M. PROSE, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 128352 COA: 245823 Oakland CC: 94-488794-CK 51 st DC 97-0274-GC SUN AND SKI MARINA, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presen ted should be reviewed by this Court.

d0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk
Document

Exhibit 10.10

QuidelOrtho Corporation
Notice of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Options
and Option Agreement
(Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan)




Pursuant to Section 6.10 of the QuidelOrtho Corporation Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), QuidelOrtho Corporation (the “Company”) hereby awards to you a Nonqualified Stock Option to purchase the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock set forth below (the “Award”).  This Award will be evidenced by this Grant Notice and the Plan.
Recipient:                
Date of Grant:                
Number of Shares:                
Price Per Share:    __________________________________________________
Total Exercise Price:    __________________________________________________


Vesting and Settlement:  Subject to the applicable tax withholding requirements, the Nonqualified Stock Options are subject to vesting and will become fully vested on the date(s) shown as set forth on Exhibit A.


Additional Terms/Acknowledgements:  The undersigned acknowledges receipt of, and understands and agrees to, this Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Notice, the Plan and the Plan Prospectus.  You further acknowledge that as of the Date of Grant, this Nonqualified Stock Option Grant Notice, the Plan and the Plan Prospectus set forth the entire understanding between the Company and you regarding the acquisition of shares of Common Stock of the Company and supersede all prior oral and written agreements on that subject with the exception of Awards previously granted and delivered to you under the Plan.  You further acknowledge that there may be adverse tax consequences upon the vesting or settlement of the Nonqualified Stock Options or disposition of the underlying shares and that you have been advised to consult a tax advisor prior to such vesting, settlement or disposition.
QuidelOrtho Corporation    Recipient:
By:             
    Signature    Signature
Title:             Date:     
Date:    
Attachments/Incorporated by Reference:     Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan










Exhibit A
VESTING SCHEDULE
**EnginesChecklist #11**

**EnginesChecklist #11**

For the National Preparedness Review you will need to have the following items available for review.

**11-1Revised 2010**

**11-8****Revised 2010**
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Choices Entertainment Corporation and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        54,586
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 26,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  149,486
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             260,077
<PP&E>                                     4,807,422
<DEPRECIATION>                             4,011,794
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,296,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,791,314
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                     220,044
<OTHER-SE>                                (1,714,818)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,296,540
<SALES>                                    1,256,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,256,223
<CGS>                                        289,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                289,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1,118,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            17,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (168,227)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
3 rd / FINAL NOTICE

May 21, 2018

Attn: Lisa Matz, Clerk of the Fifth District Court of Appeals

RE: Court Of Appeals No. 05-18-00377-CV

Trial Court Case No. 380-04376-2016

We have not forwarded the clerk’s record of this appeal due to the fact that payment has not yet been received.

Immediately upon receipt of payment, the clerk’s record will be forwarded to the Court of Appeals for filing.

ATTEST: Lynne Finley, District Clerk

Collin County, Texas

Collin County Courthouse

2100 Bloomdale Road

McKinney, Texas 75071

972-548-4320, Metro 972-424-1460 ext. 4320

By:

______________________, Deputy

Ashley Clark

cc:

Eric A. Douglas

Langford Wise & Farahmand PLLC

5101 Ross Ave Ste 200

Dallas TX 75206-7762

214-613-2541 

## COLLIN COUNTY Lynne Finley

District Clerk

2100 Bloomdale Rd

Suite 12132

McKinney, Texas 75071

972-548-4320 or

972-424-1460 Ext 4320 (Metro)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo AMAYA-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40670.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 20, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Lorenzo Amaya-Reyes appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being unlawfully found in the United States after deportation, having previously been convicted of an aggravated felony. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348,147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

In his plea agreement, Amaya-Reyes waived “any right to have facts that the law makes essential to the punishment either (1) charged in the indictment or (2) proven to a jury or (3) proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” The Government seeks enforcement of the waiver, arguing that it precludes Amaya-Reyes’s argument on appeal. We assume, *arguendo*only, that the waiver does not bar the instant appeal.

Amaya-Reyes’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Amaya-Reyes contends that *AlmendarezTorres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Amaya-Reyes properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir, R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 860.

#### United States ex rel. Mainieri *v.*New York.

February 16, 1942.

Petition for writ of certiorari *806to the Court of Appeals of New York, and motion for leave to proceed further *in forma, pauperis,*denied.

*Louis Mainieri, pro se.*
Exhibit 23
                                                                      ----------

                        Independent Accountants' Consent

The Board of Directors
Anaren Microwave, Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements (No.
33-36761,  No. 333-03193,  No.  333-70397,  No.  333-70427,  No. 333-50390,  No.
333-50392 and 333-70422) on Form S-8 and Form S-3 of Anaren  Microwave,  Inc. of
our report dated August 1, 2001, relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of
Anaren  Microwave,  Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2001 and June 30, 2000,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period ended June 30, 2001,
which  report  appears in the June 30, 2001 annual  report on Form 10-K/A  dated
November 9, 2001 of Anaren Microwave, Inc.

                                                             /s/ KPMG LLP

Syracuse, New York
November 7, 2001
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6649

LEXIE WILLIAMS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DR. ROBLES; DR. GRADDY; DR. DUBOIS; DR. NOGO,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03246-FL)

Submitted: January 6, 2023 Decided: January 18, 2023

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lexie Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6649 Doc: 7 Filed: 01/18/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Lexie Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint

under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 

(1971) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party in a civil case, the notice 

of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal 

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its order on February 28, 2022. Williams filed the notice 

of appeal on May 25, 2022.

*

 Because Williams failed to file a timely notice of appeal or 

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on Williams’ 

Declaration of Inmate Filing and postmark appearing on the envelope containing the notice 

of appeal and Declaration is the earliest date Williams could have delivered the notice to 

prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 

266, 276 (1988).

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6649 Doc: 7 Filed: 01/18/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2950 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2010 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain 

criminal history background checks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 2950 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal History 

3 Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM. 

5 Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 5119a note) is amended by striking ‘‘a 78-month’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘a 92-month’’. 

Passed the Senate January 25, 2010. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrant's December 31, 1995 audited balance sheet, income statement and cash
flow statement, and notes thereto, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   11,222,002
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,614,899
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       713,417
<OTHER-ASSETS>                               1,073,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,623,758
<COMMON>                                     2,172,116
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,235,482
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               3,407,598
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         6,000,564<F1>
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   75,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               5,140,596
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               14,623,758
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    4,238,075
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            67,742
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   3,580,943
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   3,648,685
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        589,390
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             552,416
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               1,141,806
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       623,741
<NET-INCOME>                                   518,065
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  518,065
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       359,768
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      464,187
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         471,196
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
<FN>
<F1>See Note 6 to financial statements; includes long term note payable
</FN>
        

</TABLE>