alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                  83,531,702
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                          564,737,263
<ALLOWANCES>                            24,187,392
<INVENTORY>                            523,019,559
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     1,207,732,602
<PP&E>                               1,601,762,789
<DEPRECIATION>                         708,231,731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       2,543,962,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  979,779,768
<BONDS>                                468,247,804
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                           1,058,266,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         2,543,962,336
<SALES>                              6,275,301,705
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     6,393,272,534
<CGS>                                6,127,149,472
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         3,073,910
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      28,498,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        128,299,352
<INCOME-TAX>                            13,865,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    114,434,352
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                           114,434,352
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0



</TABLE>
No. 780.

#### Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, *v.*New Haven & Shore Line Railway Co., Inc.

February 9, 1942.

*Solicitor General Fahy*for petitioner. *Messrs. Edgar J. Goodrich, Neil Burkinshaw,*and *Walter J. Brobyn*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 31.1****Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification**I, Stephen J. Hansbrough, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HearUSA, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: August 8, 2006     /s/Stephen J. Hansbrough     Stephen J. Hansbrough President/ChiefExecutive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                   FOR THE              FOR THE             FOR THE
                                 YEAR ENDED            YEAR ENDED          YEAR ENDED
                              JUNE 30, 1995 (1)      JUNE 30, 1996       JUNE 30, 1997 
                              -----------------      -------------       -------------     
<S>                              <C>                  <C>                 <C>  
NET INCOME                        $2,543,000           $2,665,000          $2,319,000
                                  ----------           ----------          ----------

PRIMARY:

  NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING     1,521,406            1,548,971           1,550,439 

  EARNINGS PER SHARE                   $1.67                $1.72               $1.50 
                                       -----                -----               -----

FULLY DILUTED:

  NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING     1,533,806            1,548,924           1,566,960

  EARNINGS PER SHARE                   $1.66                $1.72               $1.48
                                       -----                -----               -----

</TABLE>
-----------------                    

(1) NUMBER OF SHARES AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE EFFECTS OF 
    THE THREE-FOR-TWO STOCK SPLIT PAID ON SEPTEMBER 15, 1995.
#### Victor Batshever et al., Appellants, v Jafar Jafar et al., Respondents.

Submitted November 15, 2010;

decided January 11, 2011

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the September 2010 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the May 2010 Appellate Division order, dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR) § 500.22 (b) (2). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
# Hot Topics

COVID-19 and Wildland Fire Mangement

## Fire Causes

                          - Human-caused
                          - Lightning-caused

## Publications

                          - NWCG Wildfire Prevention Guides 
                          - Fire Prevention and Education Team Digital library 
                          - Education Materials (USFS) 
                          - National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) Prevention Products
                          - NFPA Firewise and Wildfire Preparedness Products 
                          - Firewise Materials 

## More Fire Prevention

-  Hot Topics 
-  Wildfire Prevention 
-  Wildfire Prevention Videos 
-  Wildfire Mitigation 
-  Wildfire Education 
-  Wildfire Investigation 
-  For PAOs 
-  Additional Resources
#### ROSE et al. v. BOURNE, Inc.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

Nov. 19, 1953.

Hays, St. John, Abramson & Schulman, New York City, for plaintiff, Billy Rose, Irwin Karp, New York City, of counsel.

Gilbert & Gilbert, New York City, for defendant, Leon Alexandroff, New York City, of counsel.

*363GODDARD, District Judge.

This is a motion pursuant to Rule 37 (a), 28 U.S.C.A., to require plaintiff, Rose, to answer certain questions propounded to him on his examination before trial.

The action is for alleged infringement by defendant of the copyright of a song entitled “That Old Gang of Mine” of which plaintiffs are the authors. Defendant published the song under a contract with plaintiffs. Plaintiffs charge, among other things, that the contract is void; that there was inadequate consideration; and that there was failure of performance in that defendant failed to provide complete and adequate accountings.

Defendant seeks to compel answers to 17 questions.

Rule 26 provides that examination may be had regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action. This Rule contemplates the broad discovery of information, subject to the above limitations, which may be useful in preparation for trial. Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport Corp., D.C., 27 F.Supp. 946. It is well established that the deposition-discovery rules are to be accorded a broad and liberal treatment. Thomas v. Pennsylvania R. Co., D.C., 7 F.R.D. 610, 611; Morrison Export Co. v. Goldstone, D.C., 12 F.R.D. 258, 259.

Questions 1-5 and 13-15 are directed to the alleged inaccuracy and inadequacy of the royalty statements furnished by defendant. Plaintiffs object, stating that they are repetitious of information already elicited. However, the evident purpose of these questions is to obtain further details and specifications of the information elicited and should be answered, with the exception of Question 3, which is argumentative.

Question 6 is objected to only as to its form. It should be answered and its admissibility reserved for the trial.

 Questions 7-12 and 16-17 are said to be irrelevant. The test of relevancy is that of relevancy to the subject matter, not the narrow test of relevancy to the particular pleadings. Chemical Specialties Co. v. Ciba Pharmaceutical Products, D.C., 10 F.R.D. 500; Stevenson v. Melady, D.C., 1 F.R.D. 329. Under this test, these questions ought to be answered.

Motion granted. Settle order on notice.
**Dozer/Tractor PlowChecklist #16**

**Dozer/Tractor PlowChecklist #16**

For the National Preparedness Review you will need to have the following items available for review.

**16-1Revised 2008**

**16-2Revised 2008**
September 20, 2021

Summary of potential change to 25 C.F.R. Part 585-Appeals on Written Submissions

National Indian Gaming Commission

The National Indian Gaming Commission seeks tribal input, feedback, and suggestions 

concerning whether it should make two substantive changes to the appeals on written 

submissions regulations, 25 C.F.R. Part 585. The first relates to motion practice and the other to 

settlement.

Motions

NIGC regulations at 25 C.F.R. § 585.4 provides that in appeals on written submissions to 

the Commission, the Chair may not file or respond to motions. The Commission shares the 

attached proposed regulatory change to 25 C.F.R. § 585.4 to allow the NIGC Chair to file 

motions in appeals on written submissions and to respond to motions when invited, directed, or 

granted leave to do so by the Commission.

Settlement

NIGC regulations provide a structure for settlement in proceedings before a Presiding 

Official,1 but not for proceedings on written submissions to the Commission. The Commission 

suggests addressing this discrepancy by establishing the attached settlement process. It is similar 

to that provided for in PO hearings, with some necessary modifications to suit appeals directly 

before the Commission.

 1 25 C.F.R. § 584.10.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission
 The Federal Communications Commission will hold an Open Meeting on the subject listed below on Thursday, October 22, 2009, which is scheduled to commence at 10 a.m. in Room TW-C305, at 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. ITEM NO.
BUREAU
SUBJECTWIRELINE COMPETITION & WIRELESS TELE-COMMUNICATIONS
TITLE: Preserving the Open Internet; Broadband Industry Practices (WC Docket No. 07-52) SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on policies to preserve the open Internet.
 The meeting site is fully accessible to people using wheelchairs or other mobility aids. Sign language interpreters, open captioning, and assistive listening devices will be provided on site. Other reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities are available upon request. In your request, include a description of the accommodation you will need and a way we can contact you if we need more information. Last minute requests will be accepted, but may be impossible to fill. Send an e-mail to: fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty).  Additional information concerning this meeting may be obtained from Audrey Spivack or David Fiske, Office of Media Relations, (202) 418-0500; TTY 1-888-835-5322. Audio/Video coverage of the meeting will be broadcast live with open captioning over the Internet from the FCC's Audio/Video Events web page at www.fcc.gov/​realaudio. For a fee this meeting can be viewed live over George Mason University's Capitol Connection. The Capitol Connection also will carry the meeting live via the Internet. To purchase these services call (703) 993-3100 or go to www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu. Copies of materials adopted at this meeting can be purchased from the FCC's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (202) 488-5300; Fax (202) 488-5563; TTY (202) 488-5562. These copies are available in paper format and alternative media, including large print/type; digital disk; and audio and video tape. Best Copy and Printing, Inc. may be reached by e-mail at FCC@BCPIWEB.com. Federal Communications Commission Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary.


[FR Doc. E9-25335 Filed 10-16-09; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 6712-01-S
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

96-2690.

#### Hicks v. O’Brien.

Licking App. No. 96CA32. Reported at 78 Ohio St.3d 1438, 676 N.E.2d 1185. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 8, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23

- 2151

Lower Tribunal No. 1 9

- 9 489

________________



### Raziel Ofer

, Appellant,

vs.



### Opustone, LLC , et al.

, Appellee s

.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Beatrice

Butchko , Judge.

Raziel Ofer

, in proper person

.

Roniel Rodriguez IV, P.A., and Roniel Rodriguez IV , for appellee

Roniel Rodriguez IV, P.A

.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and GORDO , JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

OWEN D. DENSON, JR., aka HIKIM )

SHABAZZ, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1479

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed November 14, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Pinellas County; Chris Helinger, 

Judge.

Owen D. Denson, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Denson v. State, 181 So. 3d 490 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (table 

decision); Denson v. State, 140 So. 3d 586 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (table decision); Denson 

v. State, 70 So. 3d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (table decision); Harris v. State, 777 So. 2d 

994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2644 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2644

      To suspend temporarily the duty on high pressure fuel pump.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on high pressure fuel pump.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HIGH PRESSURE FUEL PUMP.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      High pressure fuel  1.3%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        pumps for                                                          31/2011.......
                        gasoline/ethanol
                        direct injection
                        fuel systems
                        capable of
                        delivering fuel
                        at pressures of
                        3.5 MPa or more
                        and but not over
                        12 MPa (provided
                        for in subheading
                        8413.30.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2673 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2673

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain window shade material in 
                                 rolls.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain window shade material in 
                                 rolls.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WINDOW SHADE MATERIAL IN ROLLS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Window shade        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        material in rolls                                                  31/2011.......
                        measuring between
                        300 and 500
                        square feet
                        composed of wood
                        slats between 6
                        mm and 8 mm wide
                        or 22 mm and 25
                        mm wide and 1 mm
                        and 2 mm thick,
                        and/or bamboo
                        reeds between 1
                        mm and 2.5 mm
                        wide, and/or
                        marupa wood rods
                        between 1.5 mm
                        and 3 mm in
                        diameter, and/or
                        paper rope, woven
                        with polyester
                        yarn into a
                        repeating pattern
                        which may also
                        include jute,
                        yarn, and/or
                        paper materials
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        4601.94.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
*EFT OR EFT Waiver

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Batch Number:

OF-288W-4EFT*EFT Waiver*FEHBOther

Name of Casual
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE YEAR TO DATE, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          34,499
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     66,872
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               302,275
<PP&E>                                       1,945,667
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,296,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,663,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,898,817
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,672,758)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,296,144
<SALES>                                        596,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               596,372
<CGS>                                          676,723
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  676,723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,285,898
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,741,890)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,743,490)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 70,731
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,672,759)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.263)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.263)


</TABLE>