alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE: 

10 a.m., Thursday, October 22, 2009.

# PLACE: 

Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Request from U.S. #1364 Federal Credit Union to Convert to a Community Charter.

2. Request from Kansas State Supervisory Authority for an Exemption from Section 712.3(d)(3) of NCUA's Rules and Regulations.

3. Final Rule—Part 745 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Share Insurance and Appendix.

4. Insurance Fund Report.

# RECESS: 

11:15 a.m.

# TIME AND DATE: 

11:30 a.m., Thursday, October 22, 2009.

# PLACE: 

Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Consideration of Supervisory Activities (5). Closed pursuant to some or all of the following exemptions: (8), (9)(A)(ii) and 9(B).

2. Personnel. Closed pursuant to exemptions (2) and (6).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-25195 Filed 10-15-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3127 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3127

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to require regular updating of 
    the supplemental foods provided under the special supplemental 
          nutrition program for women, infants, and children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2010

Mrs. Gillibrand introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to require regular updating of 
    the supplemental foods provided under the special supplemental 
          nutrition program for women, infants, and children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUPPLEMENTAL FOOD UPDATES.

    Section 17(f)(11) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 
1786(f)(11)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(E) Supplemental food updates.--
                            ``(i) In general.--The Secretary shall 
                        enter into an arrangement with the National 
                        Academy of Sciences under which, not less than 
                        every 10 years, the Institute of Medicine of 
                        the Academy shall conduct a study that--
                                    ``(I) reviews the most recent 
                                nutrition science; and
                                    ``(II) makes recommendations for 
                                changes in the supplemental foods 
                                available under the program.
                            ``(ii) Updates.--The Secretary shall amend 
                        the supplemental foods available under the 
                        program to reflect the studies conducted under 
                        clause (i).''.
                                 <all>
```
**SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1Wildfire Smoke and Health**

**Live Read PSAs**

**WILDFIRE SMOKE AND YOUR HEALTH**

:30 SECONDS

HAVE YOU WONDERED WHY THE SMOKE FROM <NAME OF> FIRE MAKES YOU FEEL BAD? SMOKE CONTAINS MILLIONS OF TINY PARTICLES THAT CAN MAKE YOUR EYES WATER, MAKE YOUR NOSE RUN AND MAKE YOU COUGH. FOR MOST HEALTHY FOLKS, THESE SYMPTOMS WILL GO AWAY AFTER THE SMOKE IS GONE. BUT FOR SOME PEOPLE, WILDFIRE SMOKE CAN BE DANGEROUS. IF YOU’RE AROUND SMOKE AND YOU HAVE ANY TYPE OF HEART OR LUNG DISEASE, SUCH AS CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE, EMPHYSEMA OR ASTHMA, CALL YOUR DOCTOR OR YOUR COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO LEARN MORE ABOUT PRECAUTIONS  YOU SHOULD TAKE. FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT SMOKE FROM WILDFIRES, CALL <INSERT LOCAL AQ OR FS #>.

# REDUCE SMOKE POLLUTION INDOORS

:30 SECONDS

HAVE YOU BEEN TOLD TO STAY INSIDE BECAUSE OF SMOKE FROM THE <INSERT NAME OF FIRE> FIRE? OVER TIME, THE TINY PARTICLES IN SMOKE CAN BUILD UP INDOORS. TAKE THESE STEPS TO HELP KEEP LEVELS LOW:

· KEEP WINDOWS AND DOORS CLOSED. 

· RUN YOUR AIR CONDITIONER, IF YOU HAVE ONE. BE SURE TO KEEP THE FILTER CLEAN, AND CLOSE THE FRESH AIR INTAKE. 

· AVOID USING ANYTHING THAT BURNS, INCLUDING WOOD STOVES -- AND EVEN CANDLES.

· DON’T VACUUM.

· AND DON’T SMOKE. THAT JUST PUTS MORE POLLUTION IN YOUR LUNGS – AND IN THE LUNGS OF YOUR FAMILY.

FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT SMOKE IN YOUR AREA, CALL (INSERT NUMBER OF LOCAL AIR AGENCY OR HEALTH DEPT, WHICHEVER IS APPROPRIATE)

**PROTECT YOURSELF FROM WILDFIRE SMOKE**

:15 SECONDS

WILDFIRE SMOKE ISN’T GOOD FOR ANY OF US, BUT IT’S ESPECIALLY BAD FOR PEOPLE WITH HEART OR LUNG DISEASE. WITH THE <INSERT NAME OF FIRE> BURNING NEAR OUR AREA, HEAVY SMOKE LEVELS ARE A POSSIBILITY. FOR INFORMATION ON STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO PROTECT YOURSELF, CALL <INSERT LOCAL NUMBER>

**STAY TUNED TO LOCAL AIR FORECASTS**

:15 SECONDS

WITH THE <INSERT NAME OF FIRE> BURNING NEAR OUR AREA, HEAVY SMOKE LEVELS ARE A POSSIBILITY. PROTECT YOUR HEALTH BY REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF SMOKE YOU BREATHE. WHEN SMOKE IS FORECAST TO BE HEAVY, PLAN ACTIVITIES INDOORS. TO GET YOUR LOCAL SMOKE FORECAST, CALL  <INSERT NUMBER>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2632 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electrical connectors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electrical 

connectors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Banana jack connectors (provided for in subheading 

8536.69.80) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2632 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 99-4081 RANDALL WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CR-98-293) Submitted: December 29, 1999 Decided: February 1, 2000 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Lance Armstrong, LAW OFFICES OF LANCE ARMSTRONG, Miami, Florida, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, A. Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Randall White appeals his jury convictions and resulting 400 month sentence for conspiracy in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994) and possession with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We affirm. White claims on appeal that the Government's questions to twowitnesses during trial as to whether they were afraid of White constituted plain error. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the remarks did not constitute plain error. See United States v. Brewer , 1 F.3d 1430, 1434-35 (4th Cir. 1993). White also claims that the districtcourt erred in denying White's motion for a mistrial after the Government remarked during closing argument that it possessed additionalevidence that was not presented at trial. The district court immediately directed the jury to disregard the reference to additional evidence and repeated during jury instructions that argument that the Government possessed evidence not presented at trial be disregarded. Under these circumstances, and in light of the evidence against Whiteproperly adduced at trial, we find that the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a mistrial. See United States v. Morsley , 64 F.3d 907, 913 (4th Cir. 1995); United States v. Dorsey , 45 F.3d 809, 817 (4th Cir. 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 99-4081

RANDALL WHITE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville.

William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-98-293)

Submitted: December 29, 1999

Decided: February 1, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Lance Armstrong, LAW OFFICES OF LANCE ARMSTRONG,

Miami, Florida, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney,

A. Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Randall White appeals his jury convictions and resulting 400

month sentence for conspiracy in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994)

and possession with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C.A.

§ 841 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We affirm.

White claims on appeal that the Government's questions to two

witnesses during trial as to whether they were afraid of White constituted plain error. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the

remarks did not constitute plain error. See United States v. Brewer, 1

F.3d 1430, 1434-35 (4th Cir. 1993). White also claims that the district

court erred in denying White's motion for a mistrial after the Government remarked during closing argument that it possessed additional

evidence that was not presented at trial. The district court immediately directed the jury to disregard the reference to additional evidence and repeated during jury instructions that argument that the

Government possessed evidence not presented at trial be disregarded.

Under these circumstances, and in light of the evidence against White

properly adduced at trial, we find that the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a mistrial. See United States v. Morsley,

64 F.3d 907, 913 (4th Cir. 1995); United States v. Dorsey, 45 F.3d

809, 817 (4th Cir. 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         305
<RECEIVABLES>                                  536
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,488
<CURRENT ASSETS>                             4,603
<PP&E>                                       5,561
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,605
<BONDS>                                      5,858
<COMMON>                                        30
<OTHER-SE>                                     729
<SALES>                                      4,653
<TOTAL-REVENUE>                              7,157
<CGS>                                        1,337
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (394)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (827)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (827)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.19)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
      best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Steve Westlund


Steve
      Westlund


Chief
      Executive Officer, President


and
      Chief
      Accounting Officer


August
      22, 2006
MOTION DOCKET

97-728.

#### Cleveland Police Patrolmen’s Assn. v. Cleveland.

Cuyahoga App. No. 70380. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellants’ motion for immediate stay of the judgment of the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, granted.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
Exhibit No. 32.1


Alliance Health, Inc.


File No. 33-17387


Form 10-Q


Quarter ended March 31, 2011





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Health, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sarkis J. Kechejian, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated: April 22, 2011
/s/ Sarkis J. Kechejian, M. D.Sarkis J. Kechejian, M. D.Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer










A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Alliance Health, Inc. and will be retained by Alliance Health, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
217

433

10

16

*

* %
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



I, Robert Varakian, Chief Executive Officer of Catalina
Lighting, Inc., hereby certify to my knowledge, and I, Stephen G. Marble, Acting Chief Financial Officer, Catalina Lighting, Inc., hereby certify to my knowledge, that:



| | (a) | The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                               
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  | ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                        | 
|/s/ Robert Varakian     |  | /s/ Stephen G. Marble         
|Robert Varakian         |  | Stephen G. Marble             
|                        | 
|Date: February 13, 2004 |  | Date: February 13, 2004       



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Catalina Lighting, Inc. and will be retained by Catalina Lighting, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 108 (Monday, June 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13199]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel Competitive Revision--ARRA Funds.
    Date: June 11, 2009.
    Time: 1:45 p.m. to 3:45 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 
3AN18, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Rebecca H Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher 
Building, Room 3AN18C, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-594-2771. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcb6b3b4b2afb3b2aeb49cb2b5bbb1aff2b2b5b4f2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb919493958894958993bb95929c9688d5959293d59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: June 1, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-13199 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Seventh Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.54(h) 
 SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Seventh Amendment to Employment Agreement is made
and entered into as of October 31, 2007, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (“Employer”) and Jose Luis Laparte (“Executive”). 
 Recitals 
  

	 	A)	On June 3, 2004, an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive. 

  

	 	B)	Said Employment Agreement has been amended on six prior occasions; 

  

	 	C)	Employer and Executive now desire to amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow: 

 Agreement 
 1. Section 2.2 of the Agreement which currently provides:

 2.2    Bonus.    Executive shall be entitled to receive a bonus for Fiscal Year End 2007, in
the amount as set forth in, and in accordance with the terms of, the FY 2007 Management Bonus Program, as approved by Employer’s Compensation Committee on August 3, 2006. A copy of said FY 2007 Management Bonus Program is attached hereto
as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference. 
 is hereby amended, to provide as follows: 
 2.2    Bonus.    Executive shall be entitled to receive an annual bonus payment in accordance with the
terms of the applicable fiscal year's Management Bonus Program, as approved by Employer’s Compensation Committee. 
 2. All other terms
of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective. 
 Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written
above. 
  

							
	EXECUTIVE	 		 	 EMPLOYER
  
 PRICESMART, INC.

				
	Jose Luis Laparte	 		 	By:	 	 
	 	 		 	Name:	 	 
		 		 	Its: