Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 108 / Monday, June 8, 2009 / Notices 27103 

deposit rate will be the rate established 

in the final results of this review; (2) for 

previously reviewed or investigated 

companies not listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will be the company– 

specific rate established for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the less–than-fair–value 

(LTFV) investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the subject merchandise; and (4) if 

neither the exporter nor the 

manufacturer is a firm covered by this 

review, a prior review, or the LTFV 

investigation, the cash deposit rate shall 

be the all–others rate established in the 

LTFV investigation, which is 9.86 

percent. See Notice of Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils 

From Belgium, 64 FR 15476 (March 31, 

1999). These deposit rates, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Public Comment 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b), the 

Department will disclose to parties to 

the proceeding any calculations 

performed in connection with these 

preliminary results within five days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309, 

interested parties may submit written 

comments in response to these 

preliminary results. Unless extended by 

the Department, case briefs are to be 

submitted within 30 days after the date 

of publication of this notice, and 

rebuttal briefs, limited to arguments 

raised in case briefs, are to be submitted 

no later than five days after the time 

limit for filing case briefs. Parties who 

submit arguments in this proceeding are 

requested to submit with the argument: 

(1) a statement of the issues, and (2) a 

brief summary of the argument. Case 

and rebuttal briefs must be served on 

interested parties in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.303(f). 

Also, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

within 30 days of the date of publication 

of this notice, interested parties may 

request a public hearing on arguments 

to be raised in the case and rebuttal 

briefs. Unless the Secretary specifies 

otherwise, the hearing, if requested, will 

be held two days after the date for 

submission of rebuttal briefs. Parties 

will be notified of the time and location. 

The Department will publish the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in any case or rebuttal 

brief, no later than 120 days after 

publication of these preliminary results, 

unless extended. See 19 CFR 351.213(h). 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

These preliminary results of this 

administrative review and notice are 

issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated June 1, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–13343 Filed 6–5–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–803] 

Heavy Forged Hand Tools, With or 

Without Handles From the People’s 

Republic of China (Axes and Adzes): 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: June 8, 2009. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) is rescinding an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on heavy forged 

hand tools, with or without handles 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’), with respect to axes and adzes, 

for the period of review (‘‘POR’’) 

February 1, 2008 through January 31, 

2009. This rescission is based on the 

timely withdrawal of request for review 

by the party that requested the review, 

Fiskars Brands Inc. (‘‘Fiskars’’). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alan Ray, Office 9, AD/CVD Operations, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5403. 

Background 

On February 4, 2009, the Department 

published in the Federal Register its 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order heavy forged 

hand tools (‘‘HFHTs’’), with or without 

handles from the PRC with respect to 

axes and adzes. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation: Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 74 

CFR 6013 (February 4, 2009). On 

February 27, 2009, Fiskars requested an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on HFHTs, 

with or without handles from the PRC 

with respect to axes and adzes. On 

March 24, 2009, the Department 

initiated an antidumping duty 

administrative review on HFHTs, with 

or without handles from the PRC with 

respect to axes and adzes. See Initiation 

of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Requests for Revocation in Part, 74 FR 

12310 (March 24, 2009). On May 18, 

2009, Fiskars timely withdrew its 

request for review. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are HFHTs comprising the following 

classes or kinds of merchandise: (1) 

Hammers and sledges with heads over 

1.5 kg. (3.33 pounds) (‘‘hammers/ 

sledges’’); (2) bars over 18 inches in 

length, track tools and wedges (‘‘bars/ 

wedges’’); (3) picks and mattocks 

(‘‘picks/mattocks’’); and (4) axes, adzes 

and similar hewing tools (‘‘axes/adzes’’). 

HFHTs include heads for drilling 

hammers, sledges, axes, mauls, picks 

and mattocks, which may or may not be 

painted, which may or may not be 

finished, or which may or may not be 

imported with handles; assorted bar 

products and track tools including 

wrecking bars, digging bars and 

tampers; and steel woodsplitting 

wedges. HFHTs are manufactured 

through a hot forge operation in which 

steel is sheared to required length, 

heated to forging temperature and 

formed to final shape on forging 

equipment using dies specific to the 

desired product shape and size. 

Depending on the product, finishing 

operations may include shot blasting, 

grinding, polishing and painting, and 

the insertion of handles for handled 

products. HFHTs are currently provided 

for under the following Harmonized 

Tariff System of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings: 8205.20.60, 

8205.59.30, 8201.30.00, and 8201.40.60. 

Specifically excluded from these 

investigations are hammers and sledges 

with heads 1.5 kg. (3.33 pounds) in 

weight and under, hoes and rakes, and 

bars 18 inches in length and under. 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
27104 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 108 / Monday, June 8, 2009 / Notices 

1See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People’s 

Republic of China, 70 FR 36561 (June 24, 2005). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 73 FR 32557 

(June 9, 2008). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 

Request for Revocation in Part, and Deferral of 

Administrative Review 73 FR 44220 (July 30, 2008) 

(‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

4See Memorandum regarding ‘‘Request for 

Surrogate-Country Selection: 2007-2008 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the 

People’s Republic of China’’ (October 31, 2008); see 

also Memorandum regarding ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China: 

Request for a List of Surrogate Countries’’ 

(November 3, 2008) (‘‘Surrogate Country List’’). 

Rescission of Review 

Section 351.213(d)(1) of the 

Department’s regulations provide that 

the Department will rescind an 

administrative review if the party that 

requested the review withdraws its 

request for review within 90 days of the 

date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review, or 

withdraws its request at a later date if 

the Department determines that it is 

reasonable to extend the time limit for 

withdrawing the request. Fiskars 

properly withdrew its request before the 

90-day deadline. Therefore, we are 

rescinding this review of the 

antidumping duty order on HFHTs, 

with or without handles from the PRC 

covering the period February 1, 2008 

through January 31, 2009. 

Assessment 

The Department intends to issue 

assessment instructions to the U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

15 days after publication of this 

rescission notice. The Department will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties at rates equal to the cash deposit 

of estimated antidumping duties 

required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). 

Notification to Parties 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: June 1, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–13341 Filed 6–5–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–898] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to requests from 

interested parties, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is 

conducting an administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on 

chlorinated isocyanurates (‘‘chlorinated 

isos’’) from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’). The period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) for this administrative review 

is June 1, 2007, through May 31, 2008. 

This administrative review covers one 

producer/exporter of the subject 

merchandise, i.e., Hebei Jiheng 

Chemical Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jiheng’’). 

We preliminarily determine that 

Jiheng made sales in the United States 

at prices below normal value (‘‘NV’’). If 

these preliminary results are adopted in 

our final results of review, we will 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to assess 

antidumping duties on entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR for which 

the importer–specific assessment rates 

are above de minimis. We invite 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 8, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jennifer Moats or Charles Riggle, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5047 or (202) 482– 

0650, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 24, 2005, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty order on chlorinated 

isos from the PRC.1 On June 9, 2008, the 

Department published a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on chlorinated isos from the PRC for the 

period June 1, 2007, through May 31, 

2008.2 On June 30, 2008, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(2), Jiheng, a 

foreign producer/exporter of subject 

merchandise, requested that the 

Department review its sales of subject 

merchandise. On June 30, 2008, Clearon 

Corporation (‘‘Clearon’’) and Occidental 

Chemical Corporation (‘‘OxyChem’’), 

Petitioners in the underlying 

investigation, requested that the 

Department conduct an administrative 

review of Jiheng’s sales and entries 

during the POR. 

On July 30, 2008, the Department 

initiated the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on 

chlorinated isos from the PRC covering 

the period June 1, 2007 through May 31, 

2008.3 On September 5, 2008, the 

Department issued its antidumping duty 

questionnaire to Jiheng. On October 31, 

2008, the Department requested that the 

Office of Policy provide a list of 

surrogate countries for this review 

which it did on November 3, 2008.4

On November 6, 2008, the Department 

issued a letter to interested parties 

seeking comments on surrogate country 

selection and surrogate values. On 

November 21, 2008, Jiheng submitted 

comments regarding the selection of a 

surrogate country. On December 1, 

2008, Petitioners submitted publicly 

available information in order to value 

Jiheng’s factors of production (‘‘FOP’’). 

On December 5, 2008, Jiheng submitted 

comments on Petitioners’ December 1, 

2008, surrogate value information. On 

May 5, 2009, Jiheng submitted 

additional surrogate value information 

from Chemical Weekly for certain 

chemicals used in its production of the 

subject merchandise. 

On October 8, 2008, Jiheng submitted 

its section A questionnaire response 

(‘‘AQR’’). On October 23, 2008, Jiheng 

submitted its sections C and D 

questionnaire responses (‘‘CQR and 

DQR’’, respectively). On October 29, 

2008, Jiheng submitted its cost 

reconciliation. On November 5, 2008, 

Petitioners submitted comments on 

Jiheng’s AQR, CQR, and DQR. On 

December 16, 2008, the Department 

issued a supplemental questionnaire to 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES