alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38

                               FRESH CHOICE, INC.

                             OFFICER INCENTIVE PLAN



PURPOSE: To reward Officers of Fresh Choice, Inc. (Vice Presidents and above)
for accomplishments resulting in a year-end profit for the Company.

ELIGIBILITY: Officers of the Company which include Vice Presidents and above who
are actively employed by Fresh Choice, Inc. on December 26, 1999. Excluded from
this group is the Vice President of Operations who participates in a separate
incentive program.

PLAN YEAR:  The plan begins on December 28, 1998 and ends on December 26, 1999.

INCENTIVE PAY AVAILABLE: The incentive pay pool is equal to 25% of before tax
earnings above plan. The pool is allocated among the designated officers based
on a predetermined percentage amount.

INCENTIVE PAY ELIGIBILITY: PARTICIPANTS ARE ONLY ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE INCENTIVE
PAY IF THE COMPANY MAKES A BEFORE-TAX PROFIT IN 1999. THERE IS NO PAYOUT AT
PLAN.

DISTRIBUTION OF INCENTIVE PAY: Incentive pay will be paid as soon as practical
after year end financials are audited and provided that the Company makes a
before-tax profit in1999.

PLAN INTENT: Fresh Choice intends to maintain the plan under the terms listed
above. However, Fresh Choice reserves the right to terminate or reduce the plan
at any time.
I 

t 

f:'!J ~ .~ ...... 

2o~. .. ~ , ·~ · c· L) 

uOc:- IJ 

,~'~;~, Sr,.·r· Pt-; I· ···• »;"''~.•.P•. •/g : .. :·~ ~ ... , f I •. I I . I 

NO. 29,269 

STATE OF TEXAS § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

IN THE DISTRiQT COURTr".:/':··f.J;., 

I 0'••'1J••'• ........ ..,,, ;'·; 

... r_ ... , . '· ... " I 't· ... 

vs. 354TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT '/ iREBEKAH THONGINH ROSS § HUNT COUNTY, TEXAS 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

TO THE HONORABLE .JUDGE OF SAID COURT: 

Now comes REBEKAH THONG INH, Defendant in the above styled and numbered cause, 

and gives this written notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals of the State of Texas from the 

judgment of conviction and sentence herein rendered against REBEKAH THONGINH ROSS. 

Greenville, Texas 75404 

Tel: (903) 513-0510 

Fax: (903) 200-1359 

E-Mail: jessicaedwardslaw@gmail.com 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

This is to certify that on October 13, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and 

foregoing document was served on the Hunt Cou istrict Attorney's Oftice by hand delivery. 

I 

I 

1 

I FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 10/15/2015 8:37:00 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 849 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 849

   To make the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple and 
         discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 19, 2005

 Mr. Allen (for himself, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Sununu, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Leahy, 
   Mr. Burns, Mr. Smith, Mr. Warner, and Mr. McCain) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To make the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple and 
         discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Internet Tax Nondiscrimination 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON INTERNET ACCESS TAXES AND MULTIPLE AND 
              DISCRIMINATORY TAXES ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE.

    Section 1101(a) of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 
note) is amended by striking ``taxes during the period beginning 
November 1, 2003, and ending November 1, 2007:'' and inserting 
``taxes:''
                                 <all>
```
# C o urt o f A ppe a ls

o f th e S ta te o f G e o rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 E0 03 6 . MARCUS I VEY v . STATE OF GEORGI A.

M arv is Mc D aniel I v ey, a no n
- a t t o rney p u rp o rting to ac t as next friend o f
M arc u s I v ey, has f

iled a mo tio n p u rsu ant t o Co urt o f A p p eals R ule 40 (c ) seek ing a

w rit o f mand amu s d irec ting the c lerk o f the D eK alb Co u nty Su p erio r Co u rt to f ile a Sep tember 21 , 2023 no tic e of ap p eal o n behalf o f M arc u s I v ey. 1 T he mo tio n is hereby D EN I ED

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e , A tla n t a ,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t ify t ha t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

. W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

.

1 We no te t h at “ [ n]atu ral p e rso ns with no lic ense to p rac tic e law are no t p ermitted to ac t as ‘ atto rneys’ an d r e p r e s e n t o ther natu ral p erso ns in their legal af f airs. ” E ckles v

. Atla n ta Tech. G ro u p , 26 7 Ga. 801 , 804- 805 (2) (485 SE2d 22) (1 9 9 7 ).

December 07, 2023

12/07/2023
Exhibit 23.2




Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-45983) and related Prospectus of Derma
Sciences, Inc. for the registration of 3,750,000 shares of its common stock and
to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated February 25, 1999,
with respect to the financial statements of Derma Sciences, Inc. included in its
Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1997, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 31, 1999
SecurityCheck
jQuery(document).ready(function() {
  //Go through each carousel on the page
  jQuery('.owl-dots').each(function() {
    //Find each set of dots in this carousel
    jQuery(this).find('.owl-dot').each(function(index) {
      //Add one to index so it starts from 1
      jQuery(this).attr('aria-label', function(){
        let val = index + 1;
        return "Slide " + val;
      });
    });
  });

  jQuery('.owl-nav').each(function() {
    //Add arial-lable to to owl-previous
    jQuery(this).find('.owl-prev').each(function(index) {
      jQuery(this).attr('aria-label','Previous Slide');
    });
    //Add arial-lable to to owl-next
    jQuery(this).find('.owl-next').each(function(index) {
      jQuery(this).attr('aria-label','Next Slide');
    }); 
  });

});
<PAGE>
                               Exhibit 99.1

                   PRIOR YEAR 2000 READINESS DISCLOSURES


The following statement previously made by the Corporation is designated
as a "Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure" under the Year 2000 Information and
Readiness Disclosure Act.  This prior Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure was
based in part upon and repeated information provided by the Corporation's
customers, suppliers and other third parties without independent
verification by the Corporation.  This prior Year 2000 Readiness
Disclosure is superseded by the Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure in the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 1998.

1997 ANNUAL REPORT, INCORPORATED IN
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997

Shoreline is currently addressing a potential problem facing all users of
automated information systems.  The problem is how existing application
software programs and operating systems can accommodate the date value for
the year 2000.  Shoreline, by nature, is highly dependent upon computer
systems because of significant transaction volumes and date dependency for
interest calculations on financial instruments such as loans and deposits.

Shoreline developed and implemented a plan to address the year 2000 issue
during 1997.  The plan includes four general phases: raising awareness,
assessing existing systems, renovating or replacing non-compliant systems
and validating and testing.  As Shoreline does not develop or write its own
software systems, it must rely on third party vendors as a part of its
assessment phase to determine which of its systems may be vulnerable to
third parties' failure to resolve year 2000 issues.

Shoreline will continue to assess the impact of year 2000 issues on its
computer-based systems and applications throughout 1998.  Its goal is to
have all critical systems and applications compliant with the century
change by the fourth quarter of 1998, allowing for full validation and
testing during 1999.  Shoreline will incur costs associated with this
project in the form of personnel expense, professional fees and investments
in new or upgraded technology.  Based upon information currently available,
management does not presently anticipate that the costs to address year 200
issues will have a material impact on Shoreline's financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
**BLM FIRE AND AVIATION**

**EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION CHECKLIST**

For additional information, please refer to the New Employee Orientation Training in DOI Talent.

**DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR	BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT**

**https://www.doi.gov/doitalent**

1	Revised 2024

**BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT**

**NEW EMPLOYEE SAFETY ORIENTATION CHECKLIST**

**Instructions**: This checklist is designed to guide supervisors in providing employee safety orientation to new employees and volunteers. Applicable safety training and orientation should be indicated by supervisor and employee initials and date. Additional specialized training may be required for some employees. The *DOI Occupational Safety & Health Program Field Manual* can be used as a source of information on the orientation topics. Consult with your local safety manager or state safety manager to receive specific policy or additional guidance.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR	NEW EMPLOYEE SAFETY ORIENTATION CHECKLIST

***Updated 3/2023***

**(Provide additional links here as needed)**

DOI OSH Safety App for iPhone – Bloodborne Pathogens Training

DOI OSH Safety App for Android – Bloodborne Pathogens Training
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

F1 -- This amount represents Basic Earnings per Share restated in accordance
with the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128
"Earnings per Share."

F2 -- This amount  represents  Diluted Earnings per Share in accordance with the
requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 - "Earnings
per Share."

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000822418
<NAME>                        Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,524,474
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  937,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                   60,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,425,705
<PP&E>                                         3,043,971
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,828,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,651,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,013,378
<BONDS>                                        75,572
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    104
<COMMON>                                       1,506
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,560,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,651,072
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,202,550
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  450,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               594,976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6,808)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                163,975
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            163,975
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   163,975
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.03 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.02 <F2>
        




</TABLE>
TYRONE L. SMITH

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4867

Opinion filed January 9, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Tyrone L. Smith, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , fo r Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n , 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA

2002)

.

THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James A. Tuell, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Infinity, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d
15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting /s/ James A, TuellJames A. TuellExecutive Vice PresidentPrincipal Financial and Accounting OfficerMay 13, 2005
 31
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                  38,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  43,926
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  70,042
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 192,841
<PP&E>                                               0                   5,909
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 198,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                 952,934
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                  49,711
<OTHER-SE>                                           0             (1,294,595)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 198,756
<SALES>                                         67,341                 136,430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,341                 136,430
<CGS>                                           13,453                  20,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,062                 327,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (148,364)               (148,364)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,351                  52,073
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,161)               (109,517)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       400                     800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,561)               (110,317)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,561)               (110,317)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                    .003
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                    .003


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Lionel Richardson, Appellant, v Anthony Boucaud, as Superintendent of Altona Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Decided November 30, 2010

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that petitioner has been released on parole, and therefore, his liberty is no longer restrained to such a degree as to entitle him to the extraordinary writ of habeas corpus *(see People ex rel. Wilder v Markley,*26 NY2d 648 [1970]).
**Appendix 1**

**Fire and Aviation Preparedness Review Guide**

**Suggested Drill**

**Drill #6*Fire and Aviation Preparedness Review Guide***

**Use of Foam**

April 2000

A-

Drill 6-1Revised 2008
#### Sally Dinerman, Appellant, v NYS Lottery, Respondent.

Submitted October 4, 2010;

decided November 23, 2010

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the January-2010 Appellate Division order of affirmance, dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]). The prior motion for leave to appeal made at the Appellate Division was untimely *(see*Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 12:3, at 436-437 [3d ed rev]). Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the April 2010 and August 2010 Appellate Division orders, dismissed upon the ground that such orders do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2659 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2659

   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on yttrium vanadate 
                               phosphor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on yttrium vanadate 
                               phosphor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. YTTRIUM VANADATE PHOSPHOR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.65 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to yttrium oxide phosphor) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```