alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2685 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2-Dimethylbutanoic acid 3-(2,4- 

dichlorophenyl)–2-oxo-1-oxaspiro(4.5)dec-3-en-4-yl ester. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2-Dimethylbutanoic 

acid 3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)–2-oxo-1-oxaspiro(4.5)dec-3- 

en-4-yl ester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,2-DIMETHYLBUTANOIC ACID 3-(2,4- 

4 DICHLOROPHENYL)-2-OXO-1- 

5 OXASPIRO(4.5)DEC-3-EN-4-YL ESTER. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.02 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 2,2-Dimethylbutanoic acid 3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1- 

9 oxaspiro(4.5)dec-3-en-4-yl ester) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2685 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Lijo Panghat, M.D., Appellant, v New York State Division of Human Rights, Respondent.

Submitted April 16, 2012;

decided May 3, 2012

*840Motion for leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that affirmed the November 2010 Court of Claims order denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 106 (Thursday, June 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13037]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11705 and <greek-i>11706]


Minnesota Disaster Number MN-00021

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION:  Amendment 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Minnesota 
(FEMA-1830-DR), dated 04/09/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 03/16/2009 through 05/22/2009.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/22/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/08/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/09/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Minnesota, dated 04/09/2009, is hereby amended to establish the 
incident period for this disaster as beginning 03/16/2009 and 
continuing through 05/22/2009.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Roger B. Garland,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13037 Filed 6-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### FORSYTHE v. BALTIMORE & O. R. CO.

Civ. A. No. 11341.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

Jan. 21, 1954.

James P. McArdle, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Margiotti & Casey, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

In this action based upon the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., a petition is presented to compel answer to plaintiff’s interrogatory which is as follows:

> “State on what conduct, course of conduct, acts of omission or commission on the part of the plaintiff you base the allegations of contributory negligence as set forth in your answer?”

Defendant refused to answer on the legal thesis that such facts must necessarily be based solely upon the knowledge and experience of counsel, constituting the work product of an attorney, and therefore being outside the arena of discovery. Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 67 S.Ct. 385, 91 L.Ed. 451.

I do not agree that an interrogatory which seeks to elicit the basis of an allegation of contributory negligence calls any more for a conclusion or “work product” of an attorney than a resort to Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 33, 28 U.S.C., by a defendant when a gen*192eralization of negligence is alleged in a plaintiff’s complaint.

Indeed, a crucial blow would be struck at the basic and underlying purpose of Rule 33 if the Rules of Discovery were rendered impotent in securing the facts upon which an allegation of negligence or contributory negligence are premised.

Either party is entitled to secure. information by interrogatory on acts averred as constituting negligence. Sierocinski v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., 3 Cir., 103 F.2d 843; Needles v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 13 F.R.D. 460; Lincoln v. Herr, D.C., 6 F.R.D. 209.

An appropriate order is entered.
EXHIBIT 10.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

           (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002 of American Israeli Paper Mills Ltd. (the "Company") as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the
date hereof (the "Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Avi Patir, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that:

                  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

                                              /s/  Avi Patir
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name:    Avi Patir
                                              Title:   Chief Executive Officer
                                              Date:    June 23, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to American Israeli Paper Mills Ltd. and will be retained by
American Israeli Paper Mills Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2688 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2688

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Triadimefon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Triadimefon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIADIMEFON.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.33 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Free'' and inserting ``0.5%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 39 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 39

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Purple Heart is the oldest military decoration in the world in 
        present use;
Whereas the Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the President of the United 
        States to members of the Armed Forces who are wounded in conflict with 
        an enemy force or are wounded while held by an enemy force as prisoners 
        of war, and posthumously to the next of kin of members of the Armed 
        Forces who are killed in conflict with an enemy force or who die of a 
        wound received in conflict with an enemy force;
Whereas the Purple Heart was established on August 7, 1782, during the 
        Revolutionary War, when General George Washington issued an order 
        establishing the Honorary Badge of Distinction, otherwise known as the 
        Badge of Military Merit;
Whereas the award of the Purple Heart ceased with the end of the Revolutionary 
        War, but was revived in 1932, the 200th anniversary of George 
        Washington's birth, out of respect for his memory and military 
        achievements; and
Whereas National Purple Heart Recognition Day is a fitting tribute to George 
        Washington and to the more than 1,535,000 recipients of the Purple 
        Heart, approximately 550,000 of whom are still living: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Purple Heart 
        Recognition Day;
            (2) encourages all people of the United States to learn 
        about the history of the Purple Heart and to honor its 
        recipients; and
            (3) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to conduct 
        appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate 
        support for people who have been awarded the Purple Heart.

            Passed the Senate July 28, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 39

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

         To express the sense of Congress on the Purple Heart.
```
Re:
    
    Lockbox Agreement (this Agreement)
for Lockbox Number Lockbox Account Number




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



By:Name:Title:COFINA FUNDING, LLCBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as TrusteeBy:Name:Title:ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:M&I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANKBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



toby.robillard@usbank.com
 A-1




---



##### 



A-2
URIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

OP 20-0235

FILED

CLIFFORD OLD HORN, MAY 0 4 2020

Petitioner,

v.

LYNN GUYER, Warden,

Montana State Prison,

Respondent.

Bovven Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Representing himself, Clifford Old Horn has filed a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus. Upon review of his petition, we deem it appropriate to require a response.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the Attorney General or counsel for the Department of

Correction is GRANTED thirty days from the date of this Order in which to prepare, file,

and serve a written response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus together with

appropriate documentary exhibits, such as sentence calculations, and legal memorandum in

support.

The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to the

Attorney General; to counsel for the Department of Corrections; and to Petitioner personally.

DATED this 12—day of May, 2020.

Justil

05/04/2020

Case Number: OP 20-0235
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with amendment no. 1 to
the annual report on form 20 F/A of American Israeli Paper Mills Limited
(theCompany) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned Avi Brener, Active Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,to the best of his knowledge and belief, that:

| | (1)        The
Amendment fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: January 8, 2009 |  | By: /s/ Avi Brener
Avi BrenerChief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1
       
<S>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>   Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>      Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>        Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                        26
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                   0
<INVENTORY>                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              26
<PP&E>                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                26
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>     70,430
<BONDS>                        0
<COMMON>                  87,660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<OTHER-SE>              (158,064)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  26
<SALES>                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               0
<CGS>                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>             (611)
<INCOME-TAX>                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         (611)
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                (611)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                .00
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1

THORNBURG MORTGAGE, INC.

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                            |  |                      
|------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Name                                        |  | State ofIncorporation
|Thornburg Mortgage Home Loans, Inc.         |  | Delaware             
|Adfitech, Inc.                              |  | Nevada               
|Thornburg Mortgage Hedging Strategies, Inc. |  | Delaware             
|Thornburg Mortgage Depositor, L.L.C.        |  | Delaware             
|Thornburg Mortgage Capital Resources, LLC   |  | Delaware             
|Thornburg Mortgage Finance, L.L.C.          |  | Delaware             
|Thornburg Mortgage Funding, Inc.            |  | Delaware
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. 20 - 0270 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOR - EL RUBEN QUIROZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until October 18 , 202 1 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 14 2021

09/14/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0270
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. 20-0270

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JOR-EL RUBEN QUIROZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until October 18, 2021, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 14 2021

09/14/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0270
EXHIBIT 99.3
                                
                                
The Board of Directors
Prime Receivables Corporation:

We have applied certain agreed-upon procedures, as discussed
below, to the accounting records of Prime Receivables Corporation
("Prime"),  a wholly-owned special-purpose finance subsidiary of
Federated Department Stores, Inc. ("Federated"),  relating to the
servicing procedures performed by FDS National Bank, as Servicer,
under the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement") dated December 15, 1992 between Prime, as
Transferor, Federated and The Chase Manhattan Bank, successor to
Chemical Bank, as Trustee, on behalf of the Certificateholders of
Prime Credit Card Master Trust and under the Assumption Agreement
dated September 15, 1993 between Prime, Federated, FDS National
Bank and The Chase Manhattan Bank, successor to Chemical Bank.
This agreed-upon procedures engagement was performed in
accordance with standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.   The sufficiency of these
procedures is solely the responsibility of the specified users of
the report. Consequently, we make no representations regarding
the sufficiency of the procedures described below either for the
purpose for which this report has been requested or for any other
purpose.  Our procedures and findings are as follows:

     In   accordance   with  section  3.06(b)   of   the
     Agreement, we recalculated each amount set forth in
     items (i) through (xvi) of each monthly certificate
     prepared  by  the  Servicer,  pursuant  to  section
     3.04(c)  of  the Agreement, during the period  from
     February   1,  1998  to  January  30,  1999,   (the
     "Certificates")    from    information    in    the
     Transferor's   computer   generated   Daily    Cash
     Allocation Reports, the Agreement, the Series 1992-
     2  Supplement  to the Agreement dated December  15,
     1992, the Series 1992-3 Supplement to the Agreement
     dated   December  31,  1992,  the   Series   1995-1
     Supplement to the Agreement dated July 27, 1995, or
     the Series 1996-1 Supplement to the Agreement dated
     May  14,  1996,  as  appropriate.   We  found  such
     recalculated  amounts to be in agreement  with  the
     amounts set forth in items (i) through (xvi) of the
     Certificates.

We were not engaged to, and did not, perform an examination, the
objective of which would be the expression of an opinion on
management's assertion.   Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.   Had we performed additional procedures, other matters
might have come to our attention that would have been reported to
you.

This report is intended solely for your information and is not to
be referred to or distributed for any purpose to anyone other
than The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee, Moody's Investor
Services, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Corporation, as the Rating
Agencies, Investor Certificateholders or the management of Prime.



                              KPMG LLP

March 12, 1999
Title: Operational Briefings and Public Meetings Prohibited on InciWeb

Date: April 2, 2019

From: US Forest Service Fire and Aviation Management IT, NIFC, Boise ID

Effective immediately, recordings of operational briefings or public meetings, either video or 

audio, are prohibited on InciWeb. This prohibition applies to live briefings given by all-hazard

and wildland fire incident command and general staff personnel, most commonly given at the 

beginning of each operational shift and daily planning meetings.

Posted recordings of public meetings hosted by command and general staff leadership or 

authorized representatives are also prohibited. Photos of briefings and meetings are still 

permitted and encouraged on InciWeb. 

The posting of these types of live forums may inadvertently become public record and usable in 

a number of ways that InciWeb was never intended to support and is beyond the scope of its 

USDA Authority to Operate approval.

InciWeb is not an authorized federal system of record so its usage is limited to the temporary 

operational needs of each incident. System performance is significantly and negatively impacted 

by large file sizes and network bandwidth connected to these types of media is inadvertently 

compromised.

Short interviews with command and general staff explaining non-sensitive incident information 

are permitted on InciWeb. The maximum allowed video length of all video clips is one minute. 

Existing video recordings or briefings and public meetings have been removed from active 

incident records. In the future, users are strongly encouraged to remove outdated and irrelevant 

videos from their InciWeb incident page. 

For questions please contact Fire and Aviation Management Public Affairs Specialist Christine 

Schuldheisz at Christine.schuldheisz@usda.gov or 208-387-5145.
#### Harry WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. McLAIN TRUCKING, Inc., and Clyde E. Rupert, Defendants.

Civil Action No. 5924.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, W. D.

Dec. 24, 1948.

Myers and Myers and Robert D. Tou-velle, all of Celina, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Effler, Eastman, Stichter & Smith, of Toledo, Ohio, and Marchal & Marchal, of Greenville, Ohio, for defendants.

For opinion, see Stauffer v. McLain Trucking, Inc., 8 F.R.D. 478.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
FINA, Inc.:
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
listed below of FINA, Inc. and Fina Oil and Chemical Company of our report dated
January 26, 1998, except as to the third paragraph of note 1(a) which is as of
February 17, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of FINA, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and cash flows and related schedule
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which
report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of FINA, Inc.
 
     Registration Statements on Form S-8 of FINA, Inc.:
 
     - Amdel Inc. Employee Investment Plan, Registration No. 2-49321
 
     - American Petrofina, Incorporated Employee Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan
       (1979), Registration No. 2-68232
 
     - Thrift and Employee Stock Ownership Plan for Employees of American
       Petrofina, Incorporated, Registration No. 2-89230
 
     Registration Statement on Form S-3 of Fina Oil and Chemical Company
Registration No. 333-06903.
 
     Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for the
impairment of long-lived assets in 1995.
 
                                            KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
March 12, 1998