alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
      best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Steve Westlund


Steve
      Westlund


Chief
      Executive Officer, President


and
      Chief
      Accounting Officer


June
      21,
      2005
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC California Housing
Tax Credits III, L.P. (the  "Partnership")  for the year ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent
          that such  provisions  require  the  audit  reports  of Local  Limited
          Partnership  financial  statements  to refer to the  standards  of the
          Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------

Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
October 26, 2007
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Johnson, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 662]

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel F. FitzGerald, J), rendered September 14, 2012, resentencing defendant to a term of *l1!2*years, with three years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The court provided a sufficient reduction of sentence pursuant to CEL 440.46, and we perceive no basis for a further reduction. Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                        $849,000
<SECURITIES>                                  $686,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               $2,802,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 $2,987,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $7,671,000
<PP&E>                                      $3,118,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $11,339,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       $1,698,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        $1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  $9,530,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $11,339,000
<SALES>                                     $4,068,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            $4,068,000
<CGS>                                       $1,966,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               $1,766,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $21,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               $315,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   $12,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           $303,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  $303,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     $.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.27


</TABLE>
[Cite as State ex rel. Boyd v. Ward, 132 Ohio St.3d 90, 2012-Ohio-2359.]

T HE S TATE EX REL . B OYD , A PPELLANT , v. W ARD , J UDGE , ET AL ., A PPELLEES . [Cite as State ex rel. Boyd v. Ward, 132 Ohio St.3d 90, 2012-Ohio-2359.] Court of appeals’ judgment dismissing complaint for writs of mandamus and procedendo affirmed. (No. 2012-0102—Submitted May 23, 2012—Decided May 30, 2012.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Athens County, No. 11CA21.

__________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint of appellant, Ja mie Boyd, for writs of ma ndamus and procedendo to compel appellees, Judge Michael Ward and the Athens County Court of Common Pleas, to resentence him and to take into account his allied offenses of similar import. {¶ 2} Neither mandamus nor procedendo will issue if the party seeking this extraordinary relief has an adequate re medy in the ordinary course of law.
State ex rel. Jelinek v. Schneider , 127 Ohio St.3d 332, 2010-Ohio-5986, 939 N.E.2d 847, ¶ 13. Boyd had an adequate re medy by way of appeal to raise his
allied-offense and doubl e-jeopardy claims. State ex rel. Hudson v. Sutula , 131 Ohio St.3d 177, 2012-Ohio-554, 962 N.E.2d 798, ¶ 1. {¶ 3} Moreover, Boyd waived his argument concerning the propriety of Judge Ward’s representing the court of common pleas in the court of appeals by failing to raise it in the proceedings below. See State ex rel. Hawthorn v. Russell
, 107 Ohio St.3d 269, 2005-Ohio-6431, 838 N.E.2d 666, ¶ 8. Judgment affirmed.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , C UPP , and M C G EE B ROWN , JJ., concur.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 __________________ Jamie R. Boyd, pro se. Michael Ward, for appellees.

______________________
Order entered August 30, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00527-CV

RODNEY ALSUP, Appellant

V.

HICKORY TRAIL HOSPITAL AND ANGELA J. DEVINNEY, LPC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-04020

ORDER

The Court has been notified that a petition for bankruptcy has been filed in United States 

Bankruptcy Court concerning appellant Rodney Alsup. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, further 

action in this cause is automatically stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2.

Accordingly, for administrative purposes, this cause is ABATED and will be treated as a 

closed case. It may be reinstated on prompt motion by any party showing that the stay has been 

lifted and specifying what further action, if any, is required from this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P.

8.3.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

| (1) | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007                (the                “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of                section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                May 14, 2007  |                                   |                                    |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                |                              |                               |
|                                          |                                        | **/s/                Frank B. Manning** |
|                                     | Frank                B. Manning        |
|                                     | Chief                Executive Officer |

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Grants 
-  Funding Opportunities 

# Youth Farm Safety Education and Certification Program

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

Youth Farm Safety Education and Certification (YFSEC) Program for Fiscal Year 2021 supports national efforts to deliver timely, pertinent, and appropriate farm safety education to youth seeking employment or already employed in agricultural production. 

Apply For GrantDownload RFA

NIFA Language Access Services

4-H and Positive Youth Development

Application may be submitted only by Cooperative Extension Services (CES) at 1862 Land-Grant Colleges and Universities and 1890 Land-Grant Colleges and Universities, including Tuskegee University, West Virginia State University and Central State University.

Thursday, December 17, 2020

Jeff Sallee

Friday, February 12, 2021

grantapplicationquestions@usda.gov

FY 2017 YFSEC_final_revised.pdf(pdf - 515.12 KB)

Food and Nutrition Security

Education

Agricultural Safety

Farmer Education
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of A.S., a Child

No. 06-19-00003-CV

Appeal from the 62nd District Court of 

Delta County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 11100). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED MARCH 19, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

JODI AYN MUMFORD

- PORTER a/k/a JODI AYN PORTER
, individually

and as s uccessor t rustee of THE MUMFORD FAMILY LIVING TRUST UNDER AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 5, 2001
, Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
, as trustee of THE CHALET SERIES IV TRUST
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 202 2

- 3433

[ March 14, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Andrea Ruth Gundersen , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE17004053

.
Nicole R. Moskowitz of Neustein Law Group, P.A., Aventura, for appellant

.
Gray Proctor, Morristown, New Jersey, for appellee

.

P ER CURIAM

.
Affirmed.

M AY , F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for Anaren Microwave, Inc. submitted with Form 10-K for the
twelve months ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                         13,481,576
<SECURITIES>                                   15,005,129
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,333,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                   13,000
<INVENTORY>                                    8,384,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               44,007,615
<PP&E>                                         34,483,025
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (25,879,241)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 58,466,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,954,632
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       65,544
<OTHER-SE>                                     51,779,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   58,466,699
<SALES>                                        45,738,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               45,738,992
<CGS>                                          27,710,807
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  37,942,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,153,825
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,204,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,949,825
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,949,825
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.20




</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-92883) pertaining to the registration of the 1998 Nonstatutory Stock
Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-16707)
pertaining to the registration of the 1996 Stock Option Plan, 1996 Director
Option Plan, 1988 Stock Option Plan, and 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of
Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 27, 2000, with respect
to the financial statements of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Ventana Medical
Systems, Inc. listed in Item 14(2). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.


                                      /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Tucson, Arizona
March 8, 2000
**Hotshot Crew (IHC)Checklist #12**

**Hotshot CrewChecklist #12**

For the National Preparedness Review you will need to have the following items available for review.

**12-1Revised 2010**

**12-6Revised 2010**
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST

OF S.C.B., JR.,

A CHILD. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 18

- 00117

- CV

Appeal from the

383rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2016DCM6044 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in that

part of the judgment awarding retroactive child support. We therefore reverse that part of the trial

court’s judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for further p roceedings related to the

retroactive child support issue. We further order that the remainder of the judgment of the court

below is affirmed.

It appearing to this Court that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes

no other order wi th respect thereto. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2019.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez , and Palafox, JJ.
FY21 vs FY20/FY19 GGR Comparison

FY21 FY20 Inc / (Dec)
Portland $ 4,440,688,687 $ 3,115,639,674 $ 1,325,049,013
Sacramento 11,926,737,084 8,398,732,119 3,528,004,965
Phoenix 3,217,759,740 2,358,077,411 859,682,329
St. Paul 4,787 386,386 3,730,300,247 1,057,086,139
Rapid City 372,306,820 238,635,440 133,671,380
Tulsa 3,155,036,484 2,104,460,609 1,050,575,875
Oklahoma City 3,027 386,184 2,064,025,328 963,360,856
Washington DC 8,098,283,597 §,822,544,712 2,275,738,885
Total $ 39,025,584,982 $27,832,415,540 $ 11,193,169,442

%
42.5%
42.0%
36.5%
28.3%
56.0%
49.9%

46.7%
39.1%

40.2%

Fy19 Inc / (Dec)
3,811,460,603 $ 629,228,084
9,680,299,513 $2,246,437,571
3,275,522,440 $ (57,762,700)
4,922,393,815 $ (135,007,429)

376,486,722 $ (4,179,902)
2,468,143,914 $ 686,892,570
2,669,838,721 $ 357,547,463
7,374,396,307 $ 723,887,290

$ 34,578,542,035 $4,447,042,947

¢ FY21 GGR of $39B was $11.2B, or 40%, higher than FY20 GGR of $27.8B.

%
16.5%
23.2%
1.8%
2.7%
1.1%
27.8%

13.4%
9.8%

12.9%

¢ FY21 GGR increased $4.4B, or 13%, from FY19 (pre-pandemic) GGR of $34.6B.
¢ 510 Audited Financial Statement submissions from 243 Tribes.
#### In the Matter of Martin J. Rothschild, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Fifth Judicial District, Petitioner.

[977 NYS2d 663]

A certified copy of plea minutes having been filed showing that Martin J. Rothschild was convicted of promoting a sexual performance by a child, a class D felony, he is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys. Present — Smith, J.E, Fahey, Garni, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ. (Filed Nov. 22, 2013.)
-  Home 
        -  Research & Funding 
        -  Current Funding Opportunities 
        -  NIH Pathway to Independence Award (Parent K99/R00  Independent Clinical Trial Required) 

View Current Funding Opportunities

# NIH Pathway to Independence Award (Parent K99/R00  Independent Clinical Trial Required)

The purpose of the NIH Pathway to Independence Award (K99/R00) program is to increase and maintain a strong cohort of new and talented, NIH-supported, independent investigators. This program is designed to facilitate a timely transition of outstanding postdoctoral researchers with a research and/or clinical doctorate degree from mentored, postdoctoral research positions to independent, tenure-track or equivalent faculty positions. The program will provide independent NIH research support during this transition in order to help awardees to launch competitive, independent research careers.

### Funding Opportunity Details

Full Announcement:PA-20-187Related Notices or Announcements:NOT-OD-21-106; NOT-EB-21-005; NOT-OD-20-158

Program Contacts:David E. Saslowsky, Ph.D.; Tracy L. Rankin, Ph.D.; Shilpa Hattangadi, M.D. ;

K99/R00 - Pathway to Independence Award

### Key Dates

Open Date:            5/12/2020        

Letter of Intent Due Date:            Not Applicable        

Application Due Date:
Standard dates apply.

The first standard application due date for this FOA is June 12, 2020.

All applications are due by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization. All types of non-AIDS applications allowed for this funding opportunity announcement are due on the listed date(s). Applications are encouraged to apply early to allow adequate time to make any corrections to errors found in the application during the submission process by the due date.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of International Packaging and Logistic
Group, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ending September 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and
belief:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Steve
Westlund


Steve
Westlund


Chief
Financial Officer





November
12, 2009
[940 NE2d 918, 915 NYS2d 213]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Stepter, Appellant.

Decided December 16, 2010

*941APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Center for Appellate Litigation,*New York City *(Abigail Everett*and *Robert S. Dean*of counsel), for appellant.

*Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney,*New York City *(Allen J. Vickey*of counsel), for respondent.

*Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel,*New York City *(Julie Steiner*of counsel), for City of New York, intervenorrespondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Because the People have conceded that defendant has no obligation to register as a gun offender pursuant to New York City’s Gun Offender Registration Act (GORA) based upon the crime for which he was convicted, defendant’s claim that he cannot be required to register is moot. In any event, a challenge to gun offender registration under GORA cannot be raised on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence *(see People v Smith,*15 NY3d 669 [2010] [decided today]).

Defendant’s remaining argument is unpreserved for our review *(see People v Rosen,*96 NY2d 329, 335 [2001]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.