alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         354,050
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  609,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,139,755
<PP&E>                                          55,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,444,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          451,138
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,931,313
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,438,316)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,944,135
<SALES>                                      5,167,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,167,422
<CGS>                                        4,576,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,700,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,151,509
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,630,197)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,630,197)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,630,197)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 874.

#### Chianese *v.*United States.

March 2, 1942.

*Mr. Sidney Goldmann*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge,*and *Mr. Oscar A. Provost*for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
# All AS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                   1,995
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              860
<ALLOWANCES>                                               680
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             0
<PP&E>                                                   7,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                           4,773
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           6,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        0
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                               6,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             6,647
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           532
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             38
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         38
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                38
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0
        

</TABLE>
#### *In re*Kimball, Bankrupt.

*(Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts.*

May 25, 1881.)

1. Bankruptcy—Books ok Account.

A teamster, who, even to a very considerable extent, buys and sells hay and straw ior the *bona fide*purpose of keeping his teams from standing idle, is not such a merchant or tradesman as is bound to keep hooks of account- under the provisions of the bankrupt law. — [Ed.

In Bankruptcy. Petition for Revision*.

*Dudley & Dudley,*for petitioner.

*Geo. W. Morse*and *J. C. lane,*for bankrupt.

Lowell, C. J.

I am called upon to decide whether the district court was right in holding that the bankrupt was not such a merchant or tradesman as is bound to keep books of account. He was a teamster, owning many horses and carts, and engaged for years very extensively in his regular business. When that became slack, he took to supplying certain friends and neighbors with hay and straw. He did this to keep his horses and carts employed, and when he sold at wholesale he charged only enough above the cost to pay his usual charges for teaming. He sold sometimes at retail, but how often or how much does not appear. The total amount of business which he did in hay and straw, in some years, was very considerable.

I was much impressed with the argument for the creditor, that this man really had two distinct vocations, that of a *462teamster and that of a merchant. I think, however, that his case comes fairly within the principle of *Cote’s Case,*2 Low. 374. I gave the subject then all the investigation which seemed necessary, and I remain of opinion that this law is very imperfect and limited in its scope. It does not require bankers, brokers, manufacturers, carriers, and miners to keep books of account, but only merchants and tradesmen. Most of the business of the United States is done by persons who are..not within the requirement. My opinion in *Cote’s Case*was approved by *Dillon*J., *Re Stickney, 5*Dill. 91.

I do not feel bound or authorized to apply this limited law to a teamster, who, even to a very considerable extent, bought and sold hay and straw for the *bona fide*purpose of keeping his teams from standing idle.

Petition for revision denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.2
 NINTH AMENDMENT
TO
 CREDIT AGREEMENT
(Term Loan)
 Amendment Agreement , Borrower CoBank Administrative Agent Syndication Party Syndication
Parties
 RECITALS
 St. Paul Bank Credit
Agreement
 First Amendment Second Amendment Third Amendment Fourth Amendment Fifth Amendment Sixth Amendment Seventh Amendment Eighth
Amendment
    1. Definitions .




---



##### 



2. Amendments to Credit Agreement .
  Revolving Loan Credit Agreement
  Borrowing Exhibit 10.1
 Loans
 Investments
  2




---



##### 



3. Borrowers Representations .
 4. Effective Date . Effective Date
 5. Costs; Expenses and Taxes .
 6. General Provisions .
 6.1
 6.2
 6.3
 7. Governing Law .
 8. Counterparts .
 3




---



##### 



® ®
  4




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 BORROWER:CHS INC., a cooperative corporation formed under the
laws of the State of MinnesotaBy:Name: John SchmitzTitle: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
OfficerADMINISTRATIVE AGENT:COBANK, ACBBy:Name: Michael TousignantTitle: Vice PresidentSYNDICATION PARTY:COBANK, ACBBy:Name: Michael TousignantTitle: Vice President
 5
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rasalaam Jackson, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 467]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (J. Doyle, J.), rendered November 16, 2011, convicting him of assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), assault in the second degree (two counts), and a violation of probation, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

*961Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Toxey,*86 NY2d 725, 726 [1995]; *People v Barrett,*105 AD3d 862, 863 [2013]). Moreover, the “rare case” exception to the preservation requirement does not apply here because the defendant’s allocution did not cast significant doubt on his guilt, negate an essential element of the crime, or call into question the voluntariness of his plea *(People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]; *see People v Barrett,*105 AD3d at 863). In any event, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the facts he admitted during his plea allocution were sufficient to establish all elements of the crimes of assault in the first and second degrees, including the element of intent to cause serious physical injury *(see*Penal Law §§ 120.05, 120.10; *cf. People v Orama,*150 AD2d 505, 506 [1989]).

The defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel, as defense counsel provided meaningful representation *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708 [1998]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137 [1981]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Angiolillo, J.P, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Gross Gaming Revenue Growth Rate By Region

Portland Sacramento Phoenix St. Paul Tulsa Washington 

DC OK City

Overall Growth Rate

FY15 vs FY14 = 5.0%

FY14 vs FY13 = 1.5% 

FY14 FY15

Source: National Indian Gaming Commission
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         405,540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,309,927
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,346,985)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,634,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,130
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,002,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,634,163
<SALES>                                        400,350
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               402,148
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               201,549
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             149,690
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,909
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,037
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.15
        

</TABLE>
_^_ a "H\l Coarf crP /WWl£

TlOtl-Wk CoUlt\ of Am*f/ b fcbnc*

*rfc//<u,f : &A*I V/7/e5« it 11513RBGEIVIBW&-H-da^9-at

-^ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

•//) 7^. /W<£ ££££* her&bx aff^U h> fLe Tu^\ftk Co^r-t a^

$n brkjr ihou\- U<l$ P/aucA in VSola&on -h ftfie,lla*H 4Lfes*\

imlr ucel d/U-hry a^J fiit/t/sus -fctta. /Hivrn&Vt leftsi 4 U

-Hjl fob/- ert- Sk4e luS PtArfrS-Gdbj **\A. TH&lh^otifk}. jH4*m£* C

SmJ- Arc iy\ \lfoUH>n -h ftBfr CoU *£ fhtfesit**^ (le${o*<,)\>)\\{

'frPfeJlfint £*.Acl VifkS^S #LfS/2-l4 M$ *- -Mt-f)*^ -Pz>r JU , TuJll-ftk C&urt- *£ Mfldi -b &?fKP£,l State o-f bo^C PreceSf /* AfV

CJ£C &r\d ^b Comfel -Mul loves- Cto+r-h -\r> P&r>&rm tUJr <D#?VM

cLte )r\ ComphanoL butXL ife- 5h*At Ce>/isH'fa>-hbrt - ftfMlM

bait* Dl-lb-£c?lS. jn ^y FILFniW

6ton*h*e : A^^//^r^^ U IffI %/c^urtofcrimikiaVapp^, c

7^/^/7/^// Uhrt SEP 23 S

2ool 5, Smilty Drtrt, AU ,A

Be*ji(\i*73L. 79/02. AbelAcosta'Cierk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            6502
<SECURITIES>                                        13
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6554
<ALLOWANCES>                                       155
<INVENTORY>                                      17893
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 32365
<PP&E>                                            4200
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   35236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3707
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         18416
<OTHER-SE>                                       13049
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     35236
<SALES>                                          31299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 31299
<CGS>                                            18423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    18423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  7681
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    52
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5496
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1238
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4264
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4264
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, July 13, 2009, 8 a.m. to July 13, 2009, 5 p.m., Washingtonian Center Courtyard, 204 Boardwalk Place, Gaithersburg, MD 20878 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 27, 2009, 74 FR 12248.                

The meeting has been changed to July 14, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. The location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: June 1, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-13289 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         444,990
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               450,474
<PP&E>                                       5,309,927
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,502,391)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,505,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,581
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,035,5514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,505,543
<SALES>                                        315,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               372,838
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               216,046
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             177,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,033)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,033)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.96)


</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00291-CR

ERIN ANTONIO HOFFMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 371st District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1729555)

June 27, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHS Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periodended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, John Schmitz, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.     /s/ John Schmitz           John Schmitz *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*April 11, 2005
Opinion issued March 26, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00613-CV

———————————

IN RE STEWART J. GUSS & ASSOCIATES, PLLC AND EVETTE 

HOOPER, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Stewart J. Guss & Associates, PLLC and Evette Hooper, filed an

“Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus”

1

challenging the trial court’s August 22, 

2023 order denying their “Plea to the Jurisdiction, and, in the Alternative, Plea in 

1 Relators initially filed a petition for writ of mandamus on August 22, 2023, prior to 

the trial court issuing an order denying their “Plea to the Jurisdiction, and, in the 

Alternative, Plea in Abatement.” On September 7, 2023, relators filed an “Amended 

Petition for Writ of Mandamus,” challenging the trial court’s August 22, 2023 order. 
2

Abatement,” in the underlying legal malpractice lawsuit brought by real parties in 

interest, Jasleen Minhas, individually and as next friend of M.M. and J.M., minors, 

and Dharampal Minhas (collectively, the “real parties”).

2

 Relators requested that the 

“Court grant [their] Petition for Writ of Mandamus, order [the trial court] to vacate 

its August 22, 2023 ruling denying [r]elators’ pleas to the jurisdiction and pleas in 

abatement, and order [the trial court] to enter an order dismissing or abating [real 

parties’] claims.”

Our review of relators’ amended mandamus petition reflects that relators have

failed to establish that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny 

relators’ amended petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). All 

pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.

2 The underlying case is Jasleen Minhas, as Next Friend of M.M. and J.M., Minors, 

and Dharampal Minhas, Cause No. 2022-40947, in 164th District Court of Harris 

County, Texas, the Honorable C. Elliott Thornton presiding.
----

Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
I, Michael Ash, CFO of The Tirex Corporation (the "Company") do herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 
-  This Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2009 as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "report"), fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the  report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company. 
/s/ Michael Ash           Michael Ash, CFO 

Date: May 15, 2009
JAMMIE D. GORDON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 0905

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed July 6, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Jack M. Schemer , Judge

.

Jammie D. Gordon, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.