alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           141,318
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    551,649
<ALLOWANCES>                                     311,698
<INVENTORY>                                      250,847
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 662,190
<PP&E>                                         1,308,891
<DEPRECIATION>                                   963,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,007,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,537,225
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            423,524
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                       4,897,429
<OTHER-SE>                                      (335,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,007,970
<SALES>                                          974,425
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 974,425
<CGS>                                            628,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    835,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (94,199)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (561,173)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (561,173)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (561,173)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        


</TABLE>
#### Christina M. DeLorenzo, Respondent, v Peter A. DeLorenzo, Appellant.

Submitted March 21, 2011;

decided May 10, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Pigott taking no part.
#### GOTTLIEB et al. v. ISENMAN et al.

Civ. No. 53-698-S.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Sept. 22, 1953.

Jacob S. Aronson, Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.

Herbert Burstein, New York City, William Q. Keenan, Boston, Mass., for defendants.

McCARTHY, District Judge.

This is an action to recover a broker’s commission. The defendants served notices that the depositions of the plaintiffs would be taken on August 3, 1953, in Boston, and that the deposition of onp Bandler would be taken on August 4, .1953 in New York City. A subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Newr York was served upon Bandler.

*89Counsel for the plaintiffs moved this court for an order extending the time for the taking of the depositions stating that associate counsel was unavailable. At the hearing on this motion, on agreement of counsel, it was ordered that the ¡plaintiffs be examined in Boston on August 10th and that Bandler be examined •on August 11th in New York.

On August 10th the examination of the plaintiffs was begun. On August 11th, however, Mr. Bandler failed to ap'pear as directed, in New York.

The defendants’ motion now under •consideration asks that the complaint be •dismissed, and counsel argues that the ‘Court has the power to take the action requested, under Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

It is true, as the defendants have argued, that when a *party*refuses to •obey an order requiring him to make •discovery, the court may take certain •steps against the disobedient *party.*

In the case at bar, however, the person who failed to appear before the officer who was to take his deposition, is neither •a party, an officer or a managing agent •of a party.

 The relief which has been re-quested as against the plaintiffs, must, therefore, be denied. Neither may this court take action against Bandler since ,his deposition was to have been taken ■in the Southern District of New York.

The defendants have complained, not without reason, that when plaintiffs’ counsel moved the court for the order ■extending the time for taking the depositions, counsel spoke for the witness Bandler’s convenience as well as for the ¡plaintiffs, and a representation was made ■that Mr. Bandler would be ready and willing to have his examination begun the day following the taking of the ■depositions in Boston. The plaintiffs well knew the reasons why the depositions were to be taken in a particular ■order, as did Bandler, and if the plaintiffs were unable to obtain assurance whether the witness would submit to examination the day following plaintiffs’ examination, they should have so informed the court or defendants’ counsel *before*the examination of the plaintiffs was begun here.

The defendants’ rights, I have no doubt, have been abused. A lack of fundamental fairness has been shown, but the defendants must seek the relief available to them as against the recalcitrant witness in the Southern District of New York.

Motion to dismiss the complaint denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3099 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3099

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the American Falls Reservoir.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 10, 2010

 Mr. Risch (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
   of a hydroelectric project involving the American Falls Reservoir.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT INVOLVING AMERICAN FALLS RESERVOIR.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12423, the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall, at the request of the 
licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice and in accordance 
with the procedures of the Commission under that section, reinstate the 
license and extend the time period during which the licensee is 
required to commence the construction of project works to the end of 
the 3-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                        5,275,854
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 3,064,353
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        100,000,975
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                109,317,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         856,762
<BONDS>                       79,382,345
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    21,750,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  109,317,533
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              8,004,422
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              3,843,045
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            3,588,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>               572,960
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           572,960
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  572,960
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .17
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT - 99.2
                                 --------------


REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - III CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002.



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - VIB (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the
Partnership.


          November 14, 2002            /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
          -----------------            --------------------
                Date                   Joseph M. Jayson,
                                       Individual General Partner and
                                       Principal Financial Officer
C/)(//<• s^0' •/SA * FEB 17 2015



### <*»"- / , >- a tare "•*' *lc*/ c"'~ ,///*<• r* ^° " v y« ^ //^° '



### ' / . •„ CAS* I/<* -'<-"- >* IO s 4 b/J<A ^A^ VAA / ;j /*t S'*jd- s""* u nA#* itU ft, y*<,/ CcO/fC/^M V

### 1/Ufyfc -*^~ 937JL*? lot/
No. 897.

#### Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis *v.*Benner, Administratrix.

March 2, 1942.

*Messrs. CarletonS. Hadley, Walter N. Davis,*and *Arnot L. Sheppard*for petitioner. *Messrs. Mark D. Eagleton*and *Roberts P. Elam*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri denied.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Gilbert O. Cameron, Appellant, v Dora B. Schirro et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 28, 2010;

decided September 14, 2010

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the order of the Appellate Division, dismissed for nonfinality; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the May 2010 order of Supreme Court, dismissed upon the ground that no motion for leave to appeal lies to the Court of Appeals directly from that order. Any appeal from such order, if available, would be to the Appellate Division.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

      ( print page 26698)    
Pursuant to the provisions of subsection (e)(2) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(2)), notice is hereby given that at its open meeting held at 10 a.m. on Friday, May 29, 2009, the Corporation's Board of Directors determined, on motion of Vice Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, seconded by Director John E. Bowman (Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by Director Thomas J. Curry (Appointive), Director John C. Dugan (Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that Corporation business required the addition to the agenda for consideration at the meeting, on less than seven days' notice to the public, of the following matter:

Memorandum and resolutions re: Honoring Employees with 35 Years of Federal Service.

The Board further determined, by the same majority vote, that no notice earlier than May 28, 2009, of the change in the subject matter of the meeting was practicable.

Dated: May 29, 2009.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-12910 Filed 6-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
[969 NE2d 214, 946 NYS2d 97]

#### In the Matter of Damian G. and Another, Infants. Oneida County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Jacquelyn M. et al., Appellants.

Decided May 8, 2012

*842APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Koslosky & Koslosky,*Utica *('William L. Koslosky*of counsel), for Jacquelyn M., appellant.

*Mary R. Humphrey,*New Hartford, for Christopher G., appellant.

*John A. Herbowy,*Utica, for respondent.

*Susan B. Marris,*Manlius, Attorney for the Children.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and petition dismissed. The determinations of neglect against Jacquelyn M. and Christopher G. are not supported by legally sufficient evidence.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
EX-10.2


   

   

   

  Exhibit 10.2

  Lease Commencement Date Agreement

  THIS LEASE COMMENCEMENT DATE AGREEMENT, made as of this 1st day of May, 2022, by and between 105 W FIRST STREET OWNER, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“Landlord”), and CRISPR THERAPEUTICS, INC. (“Tenant”).

  WITNESSETH:

  THAT, WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant have entered into that certain Lease (as amended, the“Lease”) dated as of July 24, 2020, for certain premises located at 105 West First Street in Boston, Massachusetts; and

  WHEREAS, all capitalized words and phrases used in this Agreement and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings described to them in the Lease; and

  WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant have agreed to amend the definition of the “Outside Delivery Date”, and to confirm the Commencement Date, the Rent Commencement Date and the Expiration Date, pursuant to and in accordance with Section 2.2 thereof;

  NOW, THEREFORE, for $10.00 and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant hereby agree that (i) notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained in the Lease, the Outside Delivery Date shall be May 1, 2022, and (ii) the Commencement Date of the Term of  the  Lease  shall  be  May 1, 2022, the Rent Commencement Date shall  be January 1,  2023,  and the Expiration Date shall be December 31, 2034.

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this Lease Commencement Date Agreement as a sealed instrument as of the day and year first above written.

   

  LANDLORD:

   

  105 W FIRST STREET OWNER, L.L.C.,

  a Delaware limited liability company

   

  By: /s/ Daniel Belldegrun	

  Name: Daniel Belldegrun

  Its: Chief Executive Officer

   

  TENANT:

   

  CRISPR THERAPEUTICS, INC., 

  a Delaware  corporation

   

  By: /s/ Brendan Smith	

  	Name: Brendan Smith

  	Its: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Anaren, Inc. (the "Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I, Lawrence A. Sala,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

            (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

/s/ Lawrence A. Sala
--------------------------------------
Lawrence A. Sala
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
August 13, 2010

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Anaren, Inc. and will be retained by Anaren, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Anaren, Inc. (the "Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I, George A. Blanton,
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

            (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

/s/ George A. Blanton
--------------------------------------
George A. Blanton
Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
August 13, 2010

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Anaren, Inc. and will be retained by Anaren, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                 5
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       5
<PP&E>                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         5
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  61,960
<BONDS>                                0
<COMMON>                               97,660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                            (159,615)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           5
<SALES>                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       0
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          5
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (5)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (5)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                          (5)
<EPS-BASIC>                          00
<EPS-DILUTED>                          00


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Union Security Insurance Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter A. Walker, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 9, 2007



/s/ Peter A. WalkerPeter A. WalkerTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE
CHS INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN
  1. Article I is amended by the addition of the following new Sections 1.3 , 1.4 and 1.5:
 Discontinuance of Deferrals
 Conversion to CHS Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan
 (a)
    
    Amounts deferred pursuant to a Deferred Compensation Agreement providing
one or more scheduled payments, all of which are paid in full no later than December
31, 2008, shall not become part of the DCP, but shall instead continue to be governed
by the terms of this Plan and the Deferred Compensation Agreement until such amounts,
and any earnings thereon, are paid in full.(b)
    
    Effective June 30, 2006, payments made under Section 4.5 of the Plan
(surviving spouse benefit of former CEO) shall cease and shall instead be paid from
the CHS Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.
 Conversion to Cofina Financial, LLC Deferred Compensation Plan




---



##### 



CHS INC.By
    

    /s/ John D. JohnsonIts
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
 -2-