alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND> 
The balance  sheets for February 28, 1997 and May 31, 1996 and the statements of
operations and cash flows for the nine months ended February 28, 1997 and 1996.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         000082265
<NAME>                        Whitney American Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1997

<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                0
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          34,643
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (34,644)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               17,803
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,803)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (17,803)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,803)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,803)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
NWCG Fire Training and Incident Qualifications

Employee Name:

IFPM Position: Center Manager

NWCG Incident Management Qualifications:

Primary Core Requirement: Support Dispatcher (EDSD) 

Secondary Core Requirements: 90 Days of Wildland Firefighting Experience 

The purpose of this form is to help identify required and developmental training for the 

NWCG Incident Management Qualification Standards for this position.  The required 

training includes the IFPM “Additional Required Training” and the required training for 

the Incident Command Positions (ICS) and/or the Wildland Fire Positions based on the 

2009 Wildland Fire Qualification System Guide (PMS 310‐1).  Employees should refer

to individual agency requirements.

Course

Number

Course Name Training  

Needed

Training

Completed

Estimated

Cost

IFPM Required Training     

S‐491  Intermediate National Fire Danger 

Rating System 

    

Suggested Developmental Training     

D‐110  Dispatch Recorder       

D‐111  Entry Level Dispatcher       

D‐310  Support Dispatcher       

S‐110  Wildland Fire Suppression 

Orientation 

    

S‐130  Firefighter Training       

S‐190  Introduction to Wildland Fire 

Behavior 

    

S‐215  Fire Operations in the Urban 

Interface 

    

S‐260  Interagency Incident Business 

Management     

S‐270  Basic Air Operations     

S‐290  Intermediate Wildland Fire Behavior     

ICS‐100  Introduction to ICS 

ICS‐200  Basic ICS: ICS for Single Resources 

and Initial Action Incidents 

ICS‐300  Intermediate ICS: ICS for Supervisors 

and Expanding Incidents
#### In the Matter of Eon Shepherd, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 703]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was selected for random drug testing and a sample of his urine twice tested positive for cannabinoids, prompting a misbehavior report charging him with use of a controlled substance. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty, and that determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. Initially, the misbehavior report, the positive test results and supporting documentation, and the testimony of the correction officer who performed the drug tests provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Fero v Prack,*108 AD3d 1004, 1005 [2013]; *Matter of Coates v Fischer,*108 AD3d 997, 997 [2013]).

Turning to petitioner’s procedural contentions, we are unconvinced that he was deprived of his right to present documentary evidence. In response to petitioner’s voluminous request for documentation, the Hearing Officer adjourned the hearing on several occasions to provide petitioner with many of the documents requested, including those required by the New York regulations as well as the testing officer’s certificate of training, the maintenance procedure guidelines, the calibration report and the control test results *(see*7 NYCRR 1020.5 [a] [1]). As such, we find that the Hearing Officer did not err in finding that the balance of petitioner’s requested documents were either redundant or irrelevant to the determination *(see e.g. Matter of Pujals v Fischer,*87 AD3d 767, 767 [2011]; *Matter of Har*
      *1214
      *rison v Fischer,*56 AD3d 917, 917-918 [2008]; *Matter of Delvalle v Coughlin,*188 AD2d 812, 812 [1992]). Similarly, we find that any deficiency in petitioner’s employee assistant was cured by the Hearing Officer’s diligent efforts, and petitioner has demonstrated no prejudice *(see Matter of Booker v Fischer,*102 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2013]; *Matter of Acosta v Fischer,*98 AD3d 1170, 1171 [2012]). Lastly, the record demonstrates that the hearing was commenced and completed in a timely manner and the proper extensions were obtained *(see Matter of Lanfranco v Fischer,*105 AD3d 1235, 1235 [2013], *lv dismissed*22 NY3d 929 [2013]; *Matter of McNeil v Fischer, 95*AD3d 1520, 1521 [2012]).

Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be either unpreserved or without merit.

Peters, PJ., Rose, Stein and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  this
Consolidated  Statement of Financial  Condition at June 30, 2000 (Unaudited) and
the  Consolidated  Statement  of Income for the Nine Months  Ended June 30, 2000
(Unaudited)  and is qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such  financial
statements.

</LEGEND>


<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                       OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                   156,880
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                          5,587,830
<ALLOWANCES>                             260,815
<INVENTORY>                            2,634,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       8,615,682
<PP&E>                                 1,358,202
<DEPRECIATION>                         1,083,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         9,136,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  2,977,250
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                   1,704
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           9,136,007
<SALES>                               13,271,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      13,271,600
<CGS>                                  9,001,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         12,903,110
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       188,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          368,490
<INCOME-TAX>                             145,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      223,490
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             223,490
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .12


</TABLE>
#### Eric Martin, Appellant, v Southern Container Corp. et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 26, 2012;

decided May 3, 2012

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellant’s motion to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 203 (Thursday, October 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 54623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25464]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2009-0160]


Notice of Cancellation of Public Hearing to Determine Whether 
Transportation Collaborative, Inc. (TCI) Has Met Notification and 
Remedy Requirements

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of hearing cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NHTSA is issuing this notice to cancel a public hearing 
scheduled for October 23, 2009, at 10 a.m. This public hearing was 
originally announced in a notice published in the Federal Register, 74 
FR 48624, on September 23, 2009.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA is cancelling the October 23, 2009 
public hearing to gather information on whether Transportation 
Collaborative, Inc. of Warwick, New York, (``TCI'') had reasonably met 
its obligations under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety 
Act, as amended, to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers and/or 
remedy failures to comply with federal motor vehicle safety standards 
(FMVSS) or defects related to motor vehicle safety in fifteen (15) 
recalls involving vehicles built by U.S. Bus, Inc. of Suffern, New York 
(``U.S. Bus''). TCI has agreed to undertake all actions necessary to 
carry out the fifteen (15) recalls.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zachary Dunlap, Office of Chief 
Counsel, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590; (202) 366-5263.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 30118(e), 30120(e); 49 CFR 557.7; 
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50(a), 49 CFR 501.4(a)(3), and 
49 CFR 501.8.

    Issued: October 19, 2009.
Claude Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety and Compliance.
[FR Doc. E9-25464 Filed 10-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
#### Yenem Corp., Appellant, v 281 Broadway Holdings et al., Respondents. (And Other Actions.) Randall Co., LLC, Appellant, v 281 Broadway Holdings et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. 281 Broadway Holdings LLC et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v Hunter-Atlantic, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendants.

Submitted April 25, 2011;

decided April 28, 2011

Motion by City of New York for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
**Exhibit 31.1****Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification**I, Stephen J. Hansbrough, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HearUSA, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:August 13, 2007/s/Stephen J. Hansbrough
----

Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Michael Ash, CFO of The Tirex Corporation (the "Company") do herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

-  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the  period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

/s/ Michael Ash      Michael Ash, CFO 

Date: February 14, 2006
#### In the Matter of Alan Csorba, Appellant, v Denise Renzi, Respondent.

Submitted November 1, 2010;

decided December 21, 2010

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Family Court’s denial of appellant’s application to enforce a prior order of Family Court, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Order entered October 23, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00709

- CR
WILLIAM AUTREY, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10

- 16130

- Q



### O RDER The clerk’s and reporter’s records are overdue in this appeal

. Court reporter Marissa Garza was previously granted one thirty

- day extension of time to file the reporter’s record. On October 1, 2013, the Dallas County Distri ct Clerk filed a letter stating that appellant has not paid for the clerk’s record. However, the documents before this Court reflect that appellant is represented by court

- appointed counsel. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings o f fact regarding whether appellant has been deprived of the clerk’s and reporter’s records because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect. If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to t ake such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.

 The trial co urt shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s rec ord can be filed.

 The trial court shall next determine the date by which the clerk’s record will be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, t o this Court within THIRTY
DAYS of the date of this order. The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received,
whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.16



                         FIRST AMENDMENT
                             TO THE
          GRAPHIC PACKAGING DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
       (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1995)

                            RECITALS:

Pursuant  to the authority of the Board of Directors  of  Graphic
Packaging (the "Corporation") and the provisions of Section  7.03
of the Graphic Packaging Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"),
the Plan is hereby amended:

                           AMENDMENT:


1.   Section  1.10  shall  be replaced in  its  entirety  by  the
     following Section 1.10:


1.10     Participant Deferrals
Participant  Deferrals shall mean the amounts of a  Participant's
Compensation that he or she elects to defer and have allocated to
the  Account pursuant to section 3.01 and any deferrals  required
by section 3.03

2.   Section  3.02  relating  to Company Contributions  shall  be
     deleted and shall be replaced with the following:

3.02 Reserved

3.   The  second  paragraph of Section 4.02 shall be replaced  in
     its entirety with the following paragraph:

Fixed  Rate Fund.  The Fixed Rate Fund shall bear interest  at  a
rate  equal  to the average rate for 10-year U.S. Treasury  notes
during the month preceding the month the Bonus would otherwise be
paid  if not deferred, plus two points.  The interest rate for  a
required  deferral under section 3.03 shall be the  same  as  the
interest  rate  for  a  Bonus that was  earned  during  the  same
calendar year for which the required deferral was earned.


4.   The first paragraph of Section 5.01 shall be replaced in its
     entirety with the following paragraph:

General.   Except  for  distributions paid  upon  termination  of
employment, a Participant's Account shall be distributed  to  the
Participant  at  the time or times elected by the Participant  in
his Election Agreement.  Participant Deferrals under section 3.01
shall be deferred for at least two years beyond the date on which
the  Bonus  or  Compensation  would  otherwise  be  paid  if  not
deferred.  Distributions shall be made in a  lump  sum.   If  the
Participant  elects  to  defer the Bonus  or  Compensation  until
retirement,  he  may  also elect to receive the  distribution  in
installments over a period not longer than five years as  elected
by  him  at  the time he elects to make the Participant Deferral.
Required  deferrals under section 3.03 shall be paid as  soon  as
Code section 162(m) does not bar the Company's deduction for  the
amount paid.

     IN  WITNESS WHEREOF, Graphic Packaging has caused  its  duly
authorized officer to execute the Amendment.


                              GRAPHIC PACKAGING



                              By:________________________________

                              Title:____________________________
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing with Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Annual Report of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
September 30, 2004, (the "Report") , I, William P. Hales, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

     /s/ William P. Hales
     ------------------------------------
     William P. Hales
     President and Chief Executive Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer)

     December 23, 2004
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Sport-Haley, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned Interim Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do certify, to ourknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)        TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: September 28, 2007 |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
|                      |
| /s/ DONALD W. JEWELL      |   |
| Donald W. Jewell          |
| Chief Executive Officer   |
|                      |
|                      |
| /s/ PATRICK W. HURLEY     |   |
| Patrick W. Hurley         |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
|                           |  |  |

 

----