alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27542-27543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13592]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8915-9]


Notice of Proposed Administrative Settlement Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1), notice is hereby given of a 
proposed administrative settlement concerning the State Road 144 Ground 
Water Plume Superfund Site, Levelland, Hockley County, Texas.
    The settlement requires the Farmers' Co-Operative Elevator 
Association of Levelland, Texas settling party to pay a total of 
$60,000 as payment of response costs to the Hazardous Substances 
Superfund. The settlement includes a covenant not to sue pursuant to 
sections 106 and 107(a) of CERCLA, 42, U.S.C. 9606 and 9607(a).
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this 
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to this 
notice and will receive written comments relating to the settlement. 
The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or 
withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose 
facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any 
comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 10, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement and additional background 
information relating to the settlement are available for public 
inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. A copy of the 
proposed settlement may be obtained from Kenneth Talton, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or by calling (214) 665-7475. Comments 
should reference the State Road 114 Ground Water Superfund Site, 
Levelland, Hockley County, Texas, and EPA Docket Number 06-12-08, and 
should be addressed to Kenneth Talton at the address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph E. Compton, III, 1445 Ross

[[Page 27543]]

Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or call (214) 665-8506.

    Dated: May 28, 2009.
Miguel I. Flores,
Acting Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. E9-13592 Filed 6-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 23.1


          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form  S-8  No.   33-52125)   pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.   Deferred
Compensation  and Stock Incentive Plan for Non-Employee  Directors,  in the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-54766)  pertaining to the Amended
and Restated  Ashland Inc.  Incentive Plan, in the  Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No.  33-32612)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Employee  Savings
Plan, in the Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-55922)  pertaining to
the Ashland Inc. 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, in the  Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-49907)  pertaining to the Ashland Inc.  Leveraged Employee
Stock Ownership Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-62901)
pertaining  to  the  Ashland  Inc.  Deferred   Compensation  Plan,  in  the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-33617)  pertaining to the Ashland
Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-78675)  pertaining to the registration of 68,925 shares of Ashland Inc.
Common  Stock,  in the  Registration  Statement  (Form  S-3 No.  333-36842)
pertaining  to the  registration  of 96,600  shares of Ashland Inc.  Common
Stock, in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-54762) pertaining to
the  registration  of 149,300 shares of Ashland Inc.  Common Stock,  in the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-82830)   pertaining  to  the
registration  of  265,100  shares of  Ashland  Inc.  Common  Stock,  in the
Registration   Statement  (Form  S-3  No.  333-105396)  pertaining  to  the
registration  of 296,385  shares of Ashland Inc.  Common Stock,  and in the
Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-69138) pertaining to the offering
of $600,000,000 of Debt  Securities,  Preferred Stock,  Depository  Shares,
Common Stock and/or  Warrants of Ashland Inc., of our report dated November
3, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule
of Ashland  Inc.  and  consolidated  subsidiaries  included  in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2004.



/s/ Ernst & Young
--------------------------------------------

Cincinnati, Ohio
December 10, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie B. SHARP, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10886

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 7, 2006.

Karin B. Hoppmann, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Thomas H. Ostrander, Bradenton, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BIRCH, DUBINA and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for Willie B. Sharp, Jr., in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sharp’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.1
                                                              [NiSource logo]

Gary L. Neale
Chairman, President, and
Chief Executive Officer
                                                     801 E. 86th Avenue
                                                     Merrillville, IN 46410-6272
                                                     (219) 647.6004

                                    October 25, 1999

Mr. Roger A. Young
Chairman of the Board
Bay State Gas Company
300 Friberg Parkway
Westborough, MA 01581-5039

                           Re:      Consulting Agreement

Dear Roger:

This letter will confirm our agreement as to your status,  responsibilities  and
compensation  relating to your positions with NiSource Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiary,  Bay State Gas Company, following your retirement as a Bay State Gas
Company  employee on November  12,  1999 and  extending  through the date of the
annual meeting of NiSource's shareholders in 2002.

During that period you will  continue to serve as a  non-employed  member of the
Board of  Directors  and  non-executive  Chairman  of the Board of Bay State Gas
Company and as a member of the Board of Directors  of NiSource  Inc. In addition
you will serve on such other  Boards,  including  that of the  Institute  of Gas
Technology,  as you  and I  shall  agree  from  time  to  time.  You  also  will
periodically  brief  me and the CEO of Bay  State  Gas  Company  on  merger  and
acquisition activity in the Northeast,  and participate as requested in strategy
sessions and meetings with potential partners and targets.  You will continue to
participate as an invitee to Bay State Gas Company officer group meetings and as
requested from time to time in visits to legislators and regulators.

In addition to  compensation  received as a  non-employed  director of NiSource,
your  compensation  for all of  these  services  will be at the  annual  rate of
$24,000  to be paid by Bay State Gas  Company  in  substantially  equal  monthly
installments,  and you will be reimbursed  for expenses  incurred on our behalf.
This  compensation  will be in lieu of payments usually received by directors of
Bay State  Gas  Company.  You will  perform  these  services  as an  independent
contractor  and not as an employee of NiSource Inc. or any of its  subsidiaries.
You will be responsible for all taxes due as a result of receipt of compensation
under this agreement.

This agreement may be terminated  early by you at any time and by NiSource on 30
days notice in the event of your death or disability or if such  termination  is
determined  to be in the best  interests  of  NiSource by a vote of its Board of
Directors.
Please  signify your agreement by signing and returning a copy of this letter to
me.

                                  Sincerely,

                                  /s/ Gary L. Neale
                                  Gary L. Neale
                                  Chairman of the Board, President
                                  and Chief Executive Officer

AGREED:


/s/ Roger A. Young
Roger A. Young
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), each of the undersigned officers of KT Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005, as amended, (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 26, 2006 |  | /s/ JOONG-SOO NAM                                
|                     |  | Joong-Soo Nam                                    
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                     | 
|Dated: June 26, 2006 |  | /s/ HAING MIN KWON                               
|                     |  | Haing Min Kwon                                   
|                     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to KT Corporation and will be retained by KT Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 108 (Monday, June 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 27160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13274]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Advisory Board, June 11-12, 2009, 8 a.m. to 12 p.m., National 
Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
which was published in the Federal Register on May 14, 2009, 74 FR 
22753.
    This notice is amended to change the times of the open session on 
June 11, 2009 to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. and the closed session to 3:30 
p.m. to 5 p.m. Additionally, the open session on June 12, 2009 has been 
cancelled.

    Dated: May 28, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-13274 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00279

- CV
Platinum Energy Solutions, Inc., Platinum Pressure Pumping, Inc., Whitebox Multi

Strategy Partners, L.P. and Whitebox Credit Partners, L.P. v. Lazarus Operating LLC, John Robert Beeler and Brenda Beeler, Individually and as Trustees of The John Robert Beeler and Brenda Beeler Trust, John Robert Beeler Revocable Trust and as General Partner of the Beeler Neyland Family Limited Partnership, and the Beeler Neyland Family Limited Partnership
On Appeal from t he 369th District Court of Leon County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. NOT

- 13

- 00230

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the jud gment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. January 13, 2022
EXHIBIT 15.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-71822 and 333-134593) and Form F-3 (Nos. 333-112136,
333-121611, 333-126416 and 333-139707) of our report dated March 29, 2007, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of LanOptics Ltd. included in
this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006.


                                                /S/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
                                                A Member of Ernst & Young Global

March 29, 2007
Haifa, Israel
#### The Pride of the Ocean.

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

March 16, 1881.)

3. Wages—Master oe Foreign Vessel—Priority oe Payment.

Where a British vessel was libelled for damages caused by a collision at sea, and was found in fault, condemned, and sold, and the vessel was also libelled by the master to recover his wages and disbursements :

*Held,*that if, by virtue of the English statute, the master is entitled

. to a lien upon the ship, his claim is not entitled to a priority of payment out of the proceeds in the registry over those for the damages caused by the collision.

In Admiralty.

*W. W. Goodrich,*for petitioner.

Benedict, D. J.

The ship Pride of the Ocean was proceeded against in this court to recover damages caused by a collision. The decision of the cCurt was that the collision was caused by the negligence of those in charge of the ship, and the ship was accordingly condemned. The proceeds of her sale proved insufficient to pay the damages caused by the collision. The master of the ship, who was on board and in command at the time of the collision, now applies to be paid the amount of his wages and disbursements out of the proceeds of the ship, in preference to the claims for damages caused by the collision.

Assuming that the master acquired a lien upon the ship for his wages and disbursements by virtue of the British statute, and assuming that he did not lose his lien by omitting to enforce his claim until after the decree liad been entered for the damages caused by the collision, and by giving notice at the sale by the marshal that he insisted that she was sold subject to his claim for wages and disbusements, and would be held liable therefor, still, it is impossible to say that, in the distribution of the proceeds of the ship, the master’s claim is entitled to preference over that for the damages caused by the collision, for the reason that, having been the master of the ship at the time of the collision, he is personally liable for the damages caused by the collision; and all *248payments out of the proceeds of the ship towards the damages caused by the collision go to reduce the amount of a liability on the part of the master which has been ascertained in this court and is enforceable in this court.

The petition is therefore denied.
National Interagency Coordination Center
Toggle Font Size
      Toggle OpenDyslexic
      Toggle Dyslexia-friendly black-on-creme color scheme
      Contact Us
KeywordsHomeIncident InformationIncident Management Situation Report (IMSR)IMSR MapGeographic AreasPredictive ServicesIntelligenceWeatherFuels/Fire DangerOutlooksLogisticsAviationOverheadCrewsEquipment & SuppliesReference DocumentsAirspaceNMACAll Hazard ResponseContactAviationOverheadCrewsEquipment & SuppliesReference Documents Home
                        National Interagency Coordination Center
                        Logistics
  Crews
Geographic Area Crew Status Reports

  Alaska

Eastern

Great Basin

Northern California (North Ops)

Northern Rockies

Northwest

Rocky Mountain

Southern

Southern California (South Ops)

Southwest
 **National Interagency Coordination Center**
National Interagency Fire Center
3833 S. Development Ave.
Boise, Idaho, 83705
NIFC Homepage
              
              
              Social
  

        
              Facebook
                Twitter
                Flickr
                YouTube
                LinkedIn
              About
  

        
              About NIFC
                FAQ
                Map and Directions
                Phone Directory nifc.gov
An official website of the Department of the Interior
      
      About DOI.gov
	Accessibility statement
	FOIA requests
      No FEAR Act data
	Office of the Inspector General
	Budget & performance reports
      Agency financial reports
	Disclaimer
	Privacy policy
      Vulnerability disclosure policy
	Cummings Act notices
      Looking for U.S. government information and services? Visit USA.gov

The National Interagency Fire Center is committed to making its information and communication technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities by meeting or exceeding the requirements of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. To meet this commitment, we continue to monitor and update our content to make sure our documents meet these standards.
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the
Annual Report of Analysts International Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended January 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Andrew K. Borgstrom, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Randy W. Strobel, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
  The Report fully
  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
  The information
  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: February 24,
  2010
  By:
  /s/ Andrew K. BorgstromAndrew K. BorgstromPresident and Chief
  Executive OfficerDated: February 24,
  2010
  By:
  /s/ Randy W. StrobelRandy W. StrobelChief Financial Officer  1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7821

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TREADWAY LEVON MANNING, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior

District Judge. (4:97-cr-00323-CMC-1; 4:15-cv-04354-CMC)

Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Treadway Levon Manning, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker 

Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Treadway Levon Manning, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Manning has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny Manning’s motion for a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED