alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                            Davel Communications, Inc
                              10120 Windhorst Road
                                 Tampa, FL 33619

                                 August 7, 2001



PhoneTel Technologies, Inc.
North Point Tower
1001 Lakeside Avenue, 7th Floor
Cleveland, OH  44114
Attention: Board of Directors

Gentlemen:

          Reference is made to that certain letter agreement dated June 12,
2001, between Davel Communications, Inc. and PhoneTel Technologies, Inc. (the
"Agreement"). This letter shall serve to amend the Agreement as set forth below:

          Section 5 is hereby amended to delete the "July 31, 2001" set forth
          therein and replace such date with "August 31, 2001."

          Further, reference is made to that certain Servicing Agreement, dated
June 12, 2001, by and between Davel and PhoneTel (the "Servicing Agreement").
This letter shall serve to amend the Servicing Agreement as set forth below:

          Subparagraph (vi) of Section 3.1 shall be deleted in its entirety and
          the following substituted therefor:

               (vi) Failure of the parties to execute the Merger Agreement by
                    the date specified in the Letter of Intent, as such Letter
                    of Intent may be amended from time to time.

          If you are in agreement with the amendments to the Agreement set
     forth above, please execute a copy of this letter and return it to us.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    Davel Communications, Inc.


Agreed and Accepted as of           By:   /s/ Bruce W. Renard
                                          -----------------------------------
August 7, 2001                            Bruce W. Renard
                                          President


PhoneTel Technologies, Inc.


By:    /s/ John D. Chichester
       ----------------------
       John D. Chichester
       Chief Executive Officer
THE STATE OF TEXAS 

### M A N D A T E

TO THE 290TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on March 18l, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

Stephanie M. Trejo, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04

- 14

- 00731

- CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2014CR0086W

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on May 19, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:

          (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for
     the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with
     the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Dated: May 10, 2006                      /s/ Clyde B. Anderson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Clyde B. Anderson
                                        Executive Chairman of the Board
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         408,206
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,516
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               517,997
<PP&E>                                       4,325,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,415,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,447,218
<BONDS>                                      3,800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,850,891)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,415,440
<SALES>                                      1,517,492
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,517,492
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  937,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                684,093
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            684,093
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   684,093
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.52
        

</TABLE>
United States Department of the Interior 

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 

1849 C Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20240 

**ELECTRONIC COPY ONLY – NO HARD COPY TO FOLLOW** 

IN REFERENCE REPLY TO: 

P86 (9560) 

August 18, 2004 

Memorandum 

To: Regional Directors 

Attention: Superintendents 

From: Director //Fran P. Mainella//

Subject: Implementation of the Interagency Fire Program Management 

Qualifications Standards and Guide 

Studies of wildland fire incidents for a number of years highlighted the fact that more 

stringent, uniform qualification standards were needed for certain fire management 

positions to assure firefighter safety. The lengthy collaborative effort between the 

Department of the Interior (DOI) and the Department of Agriculture to establish uniform 

fire management qualifications standards to improve firefighter safety and increase 

professionalism in the fire management program has been completed. 

In the attached memorandum dated June 18, 2004, DOI Assistant Secretary P. Lynn 

Scarlett established October 1, 2004, as the date to officially begin implementing the 

Interagency Fire Program Management Qualifications Standard and Guide (IFPM 

Standard). A subsequent memorandum was issued on July 2, 2004, by Carolyn Cohen, 

Director, Office of Personnel Policy, to all DOI Bureau Human Resources Directors 

reaffirming this implementation date. 

The National Fire and Aviation Executive Board through the Federal Fire Training Task 

Group has chartered an interagency IFPM Implementation Team consisting of human 

resources, training and fire management personnel. The IFPM Implementation Team met 

on August 5-6, 2004, to begin their work on an interagency basis. Their first task is to 

develop an implementation plan that will be issued on October 1, 2004. This plan will 

provide guidance on the implementation process. 

The above-mentioned memorandums, the IFPM Standard and related information may be 

found on the internet at http://www.nifc.gov/training_quals/IFPM/ifpm.htm. If you have 

further questions, you may contact Mark Koontz, Implementation Team Lead at (208) 

387-5090 or via email at mark_koontz@nps.gov. 
Attachment 

cc: Associate Regional Directors, Operations
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2606 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2606

     To suspend temporarily the duty on Formaldehyde, polymer with 
   methylphenol, 2-hydroxy-3-[(1-oxo-2-propenyl)oxy]propyl ether and 
 formaldehyde, polymer with (chloromethyl)oxirane and methylphenol, 4-
              cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboxylate 2-propenoate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on Formaldehyde, polymer with 
   methylphenol, 2-hydroxy-3-[(1-oxo-2-propenyl)oxy]propyl ether and 
 formaldehyde, polymer with (chloromethyl)oxirane and methylphenol, 4-
              cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboxylate 2-propenoate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORMALDEHYDE, POLYMER WITH METHYLPHENOL, 2-HYDROXY-3-[(1-
              OXO-2-PROPENYL)OXY]PROPYL ETHER AND FORMALDEHYDE, POLYMER 
              WITH (CHLOROMETHYL)OXIRANE AND METHYLPHENOL, 4-
              CYCLOHEXENE-1,2-DICARBOXYLATE 2-PROPENOATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Formaldehyde,       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        polymer with                                                       31/2011.......
                        methylphenol, 2-
                        hydroxy-3-[(1-oxo-
                        2-
                        propenyl)oxy]prop
                        yl ether (CAS No.
                        126901-56-2) and
                        formaldehyde,
                        polymer with
                        (chloromethyl)oxi
                        rane and
                        methylphenol, 4-
                        cyclohexene-1,2-
                        dicarboxylate 2-
                        propenoate (CAS
                        No. 182697-62-7)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3907.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1-800-821-2900 | info@bktechnologies.com | www.bktechnologies.com

10/19/21

Product Announcement

Cancellation Notice: KNG2-P150 VHF Series

OVERVIEW

Effective 10/19/21, BK Technologies is no longer offering the following models of the KNG2-

P150 VHF radio. See part number and description below.

Model Number Description Replacement

KNG2-P150 136-174 MHz, 5000 channels, 6 Watt, P25 

Digital/Analog Portable

BKR5000-T3BS-1

BKR5000-T3YS-1

KNG2-P150CMD 136-174 MHz, 5000 channels, 6 Watt, P25 

Digital/Analog Portable, Specialized 

Command Groups 

BKR5000-T3BC-1

BKR5000-T3YC-1

KNG2-P150T2 136-174 MHz, 5000 channels, 6 Watt, P25 

Digital/Analog Portable without Keypad 

BKR5000-T2BS-1

REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS

KNG2-P150 VHF series is replaced by the BKR5000 series. Please contact your BK sales 

representative to order. For more information, please visit - https://www.bktechnologies.com 

SERVICE 

Previously purchased product will continue to be supported through the standard warranty 

period. Product support will be available under commercially reasonable efforts for up to five 

years after end of production through BK Technologies Customer Service Department. 

Accessories will continue to be supported through the standard warranty period.

Customer Service can be reached at 800-422-6281 or service@bktechnologies.com.

CONTACT INFORMATION

 

Questions regarding the cancellation of the above products should be directed to your 

designated sales representative at BK Technologies or BK Technologies Sales / Order Entry 

Department at 800-821-2900.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-1 No. 333-151028,Form S-3 Nos. 333-135038, 333-138303 and            333-128332 and Form S-8 No. 127527of our report dated March 31, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Derma Sciences, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2008and 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania            March 31, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 97 (Thursday, May 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11804]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR09-6-002]


J-W Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 14, 2009.
    Take notice that on May 6, 2009, J-W Pipeline Company filed an 
Operating Statement pursuant to section 284.123(e) of the Commission's 
regulations and to comply with the Commission's letter order issued on 
April 7, 2009, in Docket Nos. PR09-6-000 and PR09-6-001.
    Any person desiring to participate in this proceeding must file a 
motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#581e1d0a1b17363431363d0b2d2828372a2c183e3d2a3b763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e9afacbbaaa6878580878cba9c9999869b9da98f8c9b8ac78e869f">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, May 20, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11804 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[944 NE2d 650, 919 NYS2d 113]

#### Patriot Exploration, LLC, et al., Respondents, v Thompson & Knight LLP, Appellant.

Decided February 17, 2011

*763APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Thompson & Knight LLP,*New York City *(E. Michael Sheehan*of counsel), for appellant.

*Bernkopf Goodman, LLP (Peter B. McGlynn,*of the Massachusetts bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed with costs, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint granted on the conditions that defendant (1) consent to deeming the filing date of the Texas action to be as of October 27, 2008, the date respondents filed this action in New York, and (2) waive any statute of limitations defense in the Texas action. The certified question should be answered in the negative.

It is apparent from the record that defendant’s forum non conveniens motion was denied on the basis of Supreme Court’s mistaken understanding that plaintiffs would face a statute of limitations barrier to suit in an alternative forum. In fact, plaintiffs failed to show that any such barrier exists, and in any event, the issue can be dealt with by the imposition of conditions to which defendant has consented.

The Appellate Division majority abused its discretion in finding that traditional forum non conveniens factors warranted denial of the motion *(Islamic Republic of Iran v Pahlavi,*62 NY2d 474, 478 [1984]). This case involves the alleged malpractice by Texas lawyers representing Alaskan clients, whose principal places of business are in Connecticut, in a transaction with Texas companies that involves land in Texas. Further, the documentary evidence is located in defendant’s Texas office, as are the attorneys who allegedly committed the malpractice and most of the potential witnesses.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

*764On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of LanOptics Ltd. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Meir D.
Burstin, as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, and Dror Israel,
as Director of Finance of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Meir D. Burstin
------------------------------
Name:   Meir D. Burstin
Title:  Chairman
Date:   March 17, 2003


/s/ Dror Israel
------------------------------
Name:   Dror Israel
Title:  Director of Finance
Date:   March 17, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
* The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3847

___________ Franklin H. Burch, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western Kansas City School District; Kansas * District of Missouri. City Federation of Teachers & * School Related Personnel Local 691, * [UNPUBLISHED] AFL-CIO; Judy Morgan; Delores * Pittman; Rex Hull, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 30, 2003 Filed: May 12, 2003

___________ Before MELLOY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Franklin H. Burch appeals the district court's * adverse grant of summary judgment in Burch's employment-related lawsuit. After careful review of the record, see Eddings v. City of Hot Springs, Ark. , 323 F.3d 596, 600 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard-2-of review), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's thorough and wellreasoned opinion, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we also deny Burch's pending motions. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 /s/ James R. MurphyJames R. MurphyChairman of the Board of Directors and ChiefExecutive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)November 8, 2007
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 4, 2015

No. 04-15-00089-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF G.O.R.,

JR.,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-MH-0403

Kelly Cross, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order requiring appellant to submit to 

court-ordered medication. The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed in this appeal on 

March 19, 2015. Appellant’s first motion requesting an extension of time to file the brief was 

granted in part, extending the deadline for filing to brief to April 8, 2015. 

On April 28, 2015, a deputy clerk of this court contacted appellant’s attorney regarding 

the brief. Appellant’s attorney stated he submitted a motion for extension of time by e-filing on 

April 20, 2015. The appellant’s attorney further stated the appellant’s brief would be filed by 

midnight on April 28, 2015.

Based on the telephone conversation, the deputy clerk manually searched the e-file portal 

and located the motion. By order dated April 29, 2015, the motion was granted, extending the 

deadline for filing the appellant’s brief to April 28, 2015. Despite the assurances made by 

appellant’s attorney in his telephone conversation with the deputy clerk, the brief has not been 

filed.

Appellant’s attorney is appointed to represent the appellant in this appeal. It is therefore 

ORDERED that appellant’s attorney respond to this court in writing no later than May 11, 2015. 

The response should state a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief and 

demonstrate the steps being taken to remedy the deficiency. If appellant’s attorney fails to 

provide a reasonable explanation, this appeal will be abated to the trial court for the appointment 

of new counsel.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court