alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          26,196
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,978
<INVENTORY>                                    148,552
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               358,155
<PP&E>                                         659,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                 286,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 961,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          205,611
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           284
<OTHER-SE>                                     447,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   961,205
<SALES>                                        988,391
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               988,391
<CGS>                                          793,946
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  793,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,565
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,265
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73
        

</TABLE>
#### 166 Archer Ave. Co., LLC, Appellant, v New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Respondent.

Submitted July 6, 2010;

decided September 21, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie from the Appellate Division order, appellant having previously moved in the Court of Appeals for leave to appeal (12 NY3d 848 [2009]) from the same Appellate Division order from which it currently seeks leave to appeal *(see Stoyle v Schaub,*93 NY2d 884 [1999]).
NATIONAL INTERAGENCY FIRE CENTER

CASUAL PAYMENT CENTER

3833 S DEVELOPMENT AVE, BOISE, ID 83705-5354

PHONE: 877-471-2262 FAX: 208-433-6405

EMAIL: CASUALPAY@BLM.GOV

STATE TAX REMOVAL FORM

Name

Address

City, State ZIP

NAME: SSN: 

You currently have multiple state taxes in our system. It is required that casuals be taxed out of their Hired At state, 

unless there is a reciprocal agreement in place. To view a current listing of reciprocal agreements, go to 

https://www.nifc.gov/programs/casual-payment-center/publications.

The casual payroll system also allows for one additional state tax record to be added when a casual needs to pay state 

taxes for the state they reside in as well as the Hired At state. 

.......................................................................................................................................

Hired At State:

Check here if you would like to 

remove this state from our system.

Taxes for this state cannot be removed

unless there is a reciprocal agreement in 

place.

Additional State:

Check here if you would like to remove 

this state from our system.

Additional State:

Check here if you would like to remove 

this state from our system

....................................................................................................................................... 

Review your Wage and Earnings Statement for current withholding information. If you would like to change the current 

withholdings in our system for any of the above states, please fill out an appropriate state tax form and send in to our 

office. Please consult with a tax professional for state tax guidance.

SIGNATURE: DATE: PHONE #: 

Lead______

ATA Contractor

.......................................................................................................................................

Privacy Act Statement: Information on this form is collected under the authority of the Administratively Determined (AD) Pay Plan. Information collected via this form is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974 and Privacy 

Act System of Records Notice DOI-85. The primary use of this information is to start, stop, or change entitlements and to process any voluntary or involuntary deductions on pay and leave issues. The information you 

furnish will be used to identify records properly associated with you, to obtain additional information to update your record, if necessary, and to determine any present or future entitlement. Disclosure may be made only 

to authorized persons according to Title 5 USC 552a and for uses described in System of Records Notices DOI-85. Submission of the information in this form is voluntary; however, requests will not be completed 

without the information needed to process the request. 

Revised 01/2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited condensed balance sheets and unaudited condensed statements of
income found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to
date, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,690
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    135,387
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,902,826
<PP&E>                                       1,710,943
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,613,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          767,597
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     3,898,754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,721,255)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,613,769
<SALES>                                         14,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,816
<CGS>                                           14,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               745,133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (766,695)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (766,695)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (766,695)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.055)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.055)


</TABLE>
VIRTUAL OPERATIONS

Updates and new technology along with improvements in hardware have allowed for some 

incident response operations to be done virtually. 

Many traditional face-to-face practices have potential to promote spread of COVID-19 requiring 

reevaluation of operational procedures to prevent virus transmission. Incident operations have 

traditionally involved meeting in groups or working in close quarters to share information.

Information presented below is meant to provide guidance on some of the available tools and 

tool selection considerations that can promote virtual operations, helping limit virus spread

during incident management.

Available Tools: 

Incident responders can consider developing operational capabilities using these tools:

▪ Enterprise video communications (Zoom, GoToMeeting)

▪ Live streaming platforms (Periscope)

▪ Instant messaging systems (Slack, Skype)

▪ Video teleconferencing or video calling (VTC, Facetime)

▪ Mobile applications (Wind Ninja, Collector, Google Forms, QR Code Readers)

▪ AGOL (Story maps, story journals, data sharing and collaboration)

▪ Government web based applications (INCIWEB, EGP, WFDSS, IFTDSS)

▪ Government/public video feeds, portable incident video equipment

Tool/Application Considerations

Units will need to define task purpose and need to conclude appropriate tool/applications for use.

▪ Number in audience and purpose of meeting. Video platforms have participant limits.

▪ Is there a need to display/share information? Will Agency firewalls limit use or sharing? 

▪ Will other entities such as county agencies or the public be able to access the applications 

and do the tool/applications have a good feedback loop or ability to comment?

▪ Use of virtual tools may require time to train and learn. Some tools require multiple 

presenters to handle presentations and coordination of feedback. 

▪ Can tools/applications record presentations or save data for required documentation?

▪ Licenses may be limited or need purchased, or passwords require time to acquire. 

▪ Does the tool/application have the ability to encrypt video or data sharing for security?

▪ Have capabilities been explored for tools/applications we currently have? Are there low 

tech solutions that could be used that would be effective in a virtual environment?

▪ What equipment is needed to use the tools virtually and be effective? Cameras, Monitors,

portable printers, scanners headsets, hotspots, MiFi.
The tools/applications listed above are not all-inclusive and each unit should continue research to 

update and improve capabilities. As units develop and acquire applications or processes 

enhancing virtual work capabilities, collaboration and information sharing will be key to 

promote safe work solutions as we deal with COVID-19.
1

Filed 1/3/24 P. v. Hernandez CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JOSEPH HERNANDEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

E081830

(Super.Ct.No. RIF153872)

OPINION

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. John D. Molloy, Judge. 

Dismissed.

David L. Polsky, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and 

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
2

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Joseph Hernandez appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for 

resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. Counsel filed a brief raising no arguable 

issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 (Delgadillo).

On November 3, 2023, we notified defendant: (1) counsel filed a brief indicating 

no arguable issues had been identified; (2) as a case arising from an order denying 

postconviction relief, this court was not required to conduct an independent review of the 

record, but we could do so in our discretion; and (3) in accordance with the procedures 

set forth in Delgadillo, he had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief raising any 

argument he wanted this court to consider. We also notified defendant that if we did not 

receive a brief within that 30-day period, we may dismiss the appeal as abandoned. More 

than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. We 

consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed. (Delgadillo,

supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)
3

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

FIELDS

J.

We concur:

McKINSTER

Acting P.J.

CODRINGTON

J.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of International Packaging and Logistic
Group, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and
belief:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Steve
Westlund


Steve
Westlund


Chief
Financial Officer





May
20, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6445

JAMES M. HOGSTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA96-3804-DKC)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James M. Hogston, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney

General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James M. Hogston appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Hogston v. Department of Corrections, No. CA-96-

3804-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 25, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-18-00425-CV

____________________

TERESA HOLMES, Appellant

V.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE OF 

VENDEE MORTGAGE TRUST, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 18-30741

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The trial court signed a final judgment on August 6, 2018. Teresa Holmes 

filed a notice of appeal but failed to file a brief. On March 8, 2019, we notified the 

parties that Holmes’s brief was past due and had not been filed, and we warned the 

parties that Holmes’s failure to file a brief could result in a dismissal of the appeal 

for want of prosecution. In the absence of a brief assigning error for appellate review, 
2

we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

_____________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN

 Chief Justice

Submitted on April 3, 2019

Opinion Delivered April 4, 2019

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
# CRITICAL EVENT NOTIFICATION PROCESS- 

*(INSERT INCIDENT NAME)*

Medical Emergency:

· Initiate *(Insert Medical Responders here,i.e. EMS*)

· Notify Operations Section Chief who will coordinate response

· Follow Medical Plan

· Notify Immediate Supervisor, and Safety Officer

*(Insert Agreed Responsible here)*

· Notify Comp/Claims

· Notify Appropriate Agency Reps

· Notify Information Officer

# Off Site Traffic Accident

· Resident Relocation: (Evacuations: pre-advisory, voluntary or mandatory)

· Fire personnel requests through appropriate chain of command

· Notify IC 

· IC notifies Liaisons

· Liaisons notify appropriate agencies involved to fulfill the request/order

· Contact Responsible Law Enforcement Agency, *(Insert agency, name of contact, phone number, etc. here, maybe 911)*

· Per Law Enforcement Agency Evacuation Plan, usually coordinates evacuation, travel routes, transportation.

· Notification to County OES, usually coordinates evacuation centers, notification of other county agencies and community emergency alert.

· IC and IIO develop facts for public release/coordinate with local LE and OES

· Notification of Incident Info Centers/off incident notification

# Road Control/Closure or Change in Road Control

· Obtain Operations Section Chief authorization

· Notify Liaison (work with CHP or Law Enforcement Agency)

· Determine who makes remaining notifications

FYI-non public roads may require coordination between all agencies to determine who will be responsible

· State exact status/signing needs (ie. advisory signing, local residents only, complete closure)

· Advise Information Officer who prepares and disseminates news releases
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Cistera  Networks,  Inc. on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2006,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Derek
Downs, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/    Derek P. Downs
Derek P. Downs
President
(Principal Executive Officer)


February 1, 2007


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

















<PAGE>
exv4w1



 













	f^Tn* 1 I .. |i ?
IfM-feAl ^Pl^ e W. 4“t-o/<% ^>l U-* ^>l ^-w^v ^^PI%*Jfil            si            i =
n| banajxiage ( /%i § §
^^ A Iw T T”^ I ^ T T”^ ^""^ TTM 1 “t^ Iw T” TTM 1 n ^"^ “\. ^” T Iw T ^"^ f^ •“x ^ ^ • S            a> (R)
—
| % common stock 3AJN JJKl JJUt EJNtKXjY, 1JNL,. common stock §0^5S|i
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ^2« »< O Q ^ u ~ =
&| j,« SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP            flDDD7P 3D 7 W(l            Kl |"-EmfffiS|




	~ 2 = II gzTM S $ 5 | |E UJ-’Sga: E ^ TM »|




	^“51 uKw,,oU,,v«tvi^, w,
i.,,o^^,u,,^«i^ i^.w^^,,, ^..viw.o^vi o u^,u,,UUi^ ,0 ..^/^ v^mv,
U..u. ^^^..^.o.y, ,^v, ^y u ,v, .,«,,o,^, ^y^.




	«, ,v, .^y.o^.^v, ^ ^!J»-«iZOzfo < °l^^




	by the Registrar. fcl ||| |fg|g^|l||
Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 1^«5 ml^Sd^^iN
Pap <»-j{jm z<OQ^’OcQui^ =^
6gf •liiliii -t, n^? oKR “‘C’jSS.E
§ Dated: ^f \ % * ^ = 8 .. > I IH
^/ /f y xS?5N            rvfe’ r u 11!
^^^- /^«^s\ r            ii            i ill
= w’ SEAL i-°= \s * % =^ ^^sl




	K»jV. BRUCE THOMPSON •£ \ «•"-"•- .• 5 TOM L WARD V-’ c> < Wim I .............. IS 5 S‘5
SECRETARY ^ \<^, ^.i ^ PRESIDENT, CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER            m 3  —  ^ sb
^j (C)SECURITY-COLUMBIAN            UNITED STATES BANKNOTE COMPANY            I960 ........................................................................................ *5^ “ ....................................................... ^ ................................................................................... _^ ................................................................
.................. _^ ................................................................................. [J]“5^X
—
-  Home 
        -  Health Information 
        -  Urologic Diseases 
        -  Kidney Infection 
        -  Eating, Diet, & Nutrition 

        - English
        - Español

Kidney Infection
-  Definition & Facts 
-  Symptoms & Causes 
-  Diagnosis 
-  Treatment 
-  Eating, Diet, & Nutrition 
-  Clinical Trials 

# Eating, Diet, & Nutrition for Kidney Infection (Pyelonephritis)

## Can my eating, diet, and nutrition help prevent kidney infections?

Experts don’t think eating, diet, and nutrition play a role in preventing or treating kidney infections.

## Can drinking liquid help prevent or relieve kidney infections?

Yes. Drink six to eight, 8-ounce glasses a day. Talk with a health care professional if you can’t drink this amount due to other health problems, such as urinary incontinence, urinary frequency, or kidney failure. The amount of liquid you need to drink depends on the weather and your activity level. If you live, work, or exercise in hot weather, you may need more liquid to replace the fluid you lose through sweat.

Share this page
FacebookXEmailWhatsAppLinkedInRedditPinterest

*Previous:*                Treatment            *Next:*                Clinical Trials            

        This content is provided as a service of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases(NIDDK), part of the National Institutes of Health. NIDDK translates and disseminates research findings to increase knowledge and understanding about health and disease among patients, health professionals, and the public. Content produced by NIDDK is carefully reviewed by NIDDK scientists and other experts.

The NIDDK would like to thank:Ann E. Stapleton, MD, FIDSA, FACP, University of Washington School of Medicine
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Packaging and Logistic Group, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Steve Westlund


Steve Westlund


Chief Financial Officer





June 2, 2010