alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gary L. SMITH, Appellant, v. Molly LANCASTER; Oprah Winfrey; Harpo Productions, Inc., Appellees.

No. 05-2440.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 23, 2006.

Filed: June 28, 2006.

Gary L. Smith, Glenville, WV, pro se.

Molly Lancaster, St. Louis, MO, pro se.

Michael A. Kahn, Geoffrey Gerald Gerber, Kelly K. Pilla, Blackwell & Sanders, St. Louis, MO, for Appellees.

Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Gary Lee Smith appeals the district court’s1 orders dismissing Molly Lancaster and granting summary judgment in favor of Oprah Winfrey and Harpo Productions in his defamation and copyright-infringement action. After de novo review, *see Kasper v. Federated Mut. Ins.*
      *696
      *Co.,*425 F.3d 496, 502 (8th Cir.2005) (summary judgment); *Moore v. Sims,*200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (dismissal), we conclude the dismissal and grant of summary judgment were proper. Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
No. 861.

#### United Services Automobile Association *v.*Harman et al.

February 16, 1942.

*Mr. Henry I. Quinn*for petitioner. *Messrs. Max Sokol, Samuel S. Smalkin,*and *George Clark*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals, 4th Supreme Judicial District, of Texas, denied.
Resources for Resuming Operations
The National Indian Gaming 

Commission’s resources on COVID 

provide tools to empower tribal 

decision making and promote 

predictable Agency action.

Resources for Resuming Operations
Resources for Resuming Operations

COMMUNICATE MONITOR COLLABORATE
COMMUNICATE

A two-month long NIGC Informational 

Sessions Series has been designed to discuss 

the timely topics identified by invited guests 

representing national and regional 

organizations.

Efficient and transparent communications 

maintained and collected on the NIGC 

website‘s COVID Resources section includes 

Dear Tribal Leader Letters, FAQs, and relevant 

NIGC operations memoranda to staff.

A dedicated NIGC email account provides a 

rapid response to any inquiries from Tribal 

officials or Indian gaming operators.
MONITOR

The NIGC’s weekly By The Numbers is a 

collection of updates and statistics related to 

reopening activity across Indian gaming’s 

operations and regulatory community.

Daily information sharing across the NIGC’s 

eight region offices, the Compliance division 

leadership, and the Commission provides 

realtime updates and informs Agency plans.

NIGC Region Office outreach includes a 

proactive discussion on topics related to the 

NIGC’s Preliminary Assessment Tool for 

environmental and public health and safety 

considerations.
COLLABORATE

A national NIGC virtual training session in 

August will address topics and facilitate 

discussions related to COVID, national 

priorities, and regional compliance findings.

The NIGC participates in federal coordination 

efforts to communicate among subject matter 

experts, program administrators, and agency 

leaders in order to promote best practices and 

support local solutions. 

A two-part NIGC roundtable discussion series 

in late-summer will highlight perspectives on 

how technology promotes mitigation and the 

challenges facing rurally-located operations.
Visit www.nigc.gov for up-to-date resource material

Submit questions to COVID.Resources@nigc.gov

Coordinate with regional office leadership

Resources for Resuming Operations
• Local Agency Security Officer (LASO) Designation

• On-line Security Awareness Training available to Users/TGRA

• Outsourcing Agreement Approvals thru FBI Compact Officer

• NIGC CJIS Audits and Checklist Underway to prepare for next FBI Audit 

Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# VMLRP Veterinary Shortage Situation Nomination Guide

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

The following information is a step-by-step guide for State Animal Health Officials (SAHOs) and their staff to prepare and submit veterinary shortage situation area nominations. These nominations fill the growing need for food supply veterinarians to serve in areas identified by them within their state for the Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment Program (VMLRP). The goal of the VMLRP is to encourage food supply veterinarians to serve in areas across the U.S. that have the most serious veterinary shortage situations in exchange for veterinary education loan repayment.

VMLRP SAHO Shortage Situation Nominations Guide 2023(pdf - 509.86 KB)

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

funding opportunityNew Beginning for Tribal Students Program

funding opportunityResearch Facilities Act Program

funding opportunityAgriculture and Food Research Initiative - Education and Workforce Development

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

postProtecting Our Water

postNumber of AFRI FY 2024 Commodity Board Co-Funding Topics Breaks Record; Expands Focus on Nutrition 

postTropical Birds Could Tolerate Warming Better Than Expected 

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

postTropical Birds Could Tolerate Warming Better Than Expected 

postCultivating the Future: Agricultural Innovations for Climate Resilience

postNevada Researcher Aims to Improve Sorghum Hybrids for Dairy Cattle Feed
No. 895.

#### Puget Sound Power & Light Co. et al. *v.*Public Utility District No. 1 of Whatcom County.

March 2, 1942.

*Messrs. Elmer E. Todd, Frank E. Holman, E. L. Skeel,*and *Ferd J. Schaaf*for petitioners. *Mr. E. K. Murray*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Daniel S. Tamkin,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Synergx  Systems certify
that:

       1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Synergx
Systems Inc.;

       2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

       3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

        4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

        a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period cover by this report based on such evaluation; and

        c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

       5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

        a) All significant deficiencies in material weakness the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:    August 12, 2005
         /S/ Daniel S. Tamkin
         Daniel S. Tamkin
         Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Infinity, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Stanton E. RossStanton E. RossPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2005/s/ James A. TuellJames A. TuellExecutive Vice PresidentPrincipal Financial and Accounting OfficerMay 13, 2005
 32
INTER PARFUMS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES





Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an
officer of Inter Parfums, Inc., that the Quarterly Report of Inter Parfums, Inc.
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Inter Parfums,
Inc.





Date:
      November 6, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Jean MadarJean
      Madar,Chief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Inter Parfums, Inc. and will be retained by Inter Parfums, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of InternationalPackaging and Logistic Group, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ending June 30, 2014 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Owen Naccarato

Owen Naccarato

ChiefFinancial Officer

 

August 20, 2014
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER D ENYING M OTION FOR R EHEARING Appellate case name: In re TIC Philly Lansdale 2, LLC, TIC Philly Lansdale 3 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 4 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 5 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansda le 6 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdal e 7 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 8 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 9 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 10 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 11 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 13 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 14 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 16 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansd ale 18 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansd ale 19 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 2 0 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 2 1 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 2 3 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 2 4 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 2 5 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 2 7 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 2 9 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 30 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 31 , LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 3 2, LLC , TIC Philly Lansdale 33 , LLC , and Wayne Mar, d/b/a TIC Philly Lansdale H Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00192

- CV

Trial court case number: 2021

- 46723

Trial court: 151st District Cou rt of Harris Cou nty

Date Motion filed: May 20, 2022 Party filing motion: R e lator

It is ordered that Relator ’ s Motion for Rehearing i s denied

. Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss_________ Acting f or th e Court

Panel consists of Chief Ju st ice Radack and J ustices Hightower and Countiss

. Date: June 9, 2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCOS RIVERA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 209 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCOS RIVERA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 210 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCOS RIVERA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 211 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM
[209 EAL 2022, 210 EAL 2022 and 211 EAL 2022] - 2

AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         357,724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,514,741
<ALLOWANCES>                                   381,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,103,434
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,271,220
<PP&E>                                       9,099,675
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,475,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,840,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,958,971
<BONDS>                                      2,298,905
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       21,664,809
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,080)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,840,000
<SALES>                                     16,829,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,829,334
<CGS>                                       11,512,949
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,236,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,387,751
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             735,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,820,828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (811,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,009,640)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,009,640)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.69)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
Worldtex, Inc.:

          We consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 of Worldtex,  Inc. filed November 30, 1992 (No. 33-55124)
and filed  December 8, 1993 (No.  33-72640)  of our audit  report dated March 4,
1997,  relating  to the  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Worldtex,  Inc.  and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31, 1996 and 1995,  and the related  consolidated
statements of income,  stockholders'  equity and cash flows and related schedule
for the three years then ended,  which  report  appears in the December 31, 1996
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Worldtex, Inc.


                                                           KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 28, 1997
#### Patricia J. Curto, Appellant, v National Fuel Corporation, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[977 NYS2d 664]

Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Scudder, EJ., Fahey, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.
#### Alice Kramer, Respondent, v Phoenix Life Insurance Co. et al., Defendants, and Lifemark S.A., Intervenor-Appellant. (And Third-Party Actions.)

Submitted September 13, 2010;

decided September 16, 2010

Motion by Life Insurance Settlement Association for leave to appear amicus curiae on consideration of the certified question herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
United States Department of the Interior 

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 

Fire Management Program Center 

 3833 S. Development Avenue 

** ELECTRONIC COPY ONLY. NO HARDCOPY TO FOLLOW **

Boise, Idaho 83705-5354 

IN REPLY REFER TO: 

Y14 (9560) 

November 7, 2006 

Memorandum 

To: Regional Fire Management Officers 

From: NPS Fire Director - NIFC /s/ Mike Wallace

Subject: IFPM Position Input to IQCS 

On June 27, 2006 the National Fire and Aviation Executive Board (NFAEB) issued a memo 

asking the field to enter the IFPM minimum qualification standards into IQCS by January 1, 

2007 for those employees identified to be in one of the 14 key positions. To assist in this process 

an IQCS training module (IFPM Module) was developed to explain the steps necessary for 

entering the IFPM data into IQCS. An IFPM-IQCS Update Form has also been developed to 

consolidate all the relevant information for entry into IQCS. Both of these documents are 

available on the IFPM and IQCS websites. 

Please remember, even if an employee does not meet all the requirements for their IFPM position 

the data can be entered into IQCS and updated as the employee works toward meeting the 

requirements for their position. This is particularly important for those employees in 

professional (GS-0401) positions who are using the combination of education (24 semester 

hours) and experience to meet the positive education requirements for their position. If an 

employee does not have all 24 semester hours please be sure to enter the number of creditable 

semester hours (upper and lower division) they currently have and make updates as necessary. 

Once the data is in IQCS we will be looking at the data to help plan for the remainder of the 

implementation period. 

It has also come to my attention that some units have not completed and forwarded on their 

incumbent declarations to their servicing HR office. If this has not been completed please do so 

as soon as possible. If you or your employees have not received their qualification determination 

letter back from HR please contact Mark Koontz. Remember, as employees meet the minimum 

qualification standards for their position they will need to submit another incumbent declaration 

to HR so that a final qualification determination letter can be issued. 

If you have any questions please contact Mark Koontz at 208-387-5090 or 

Mark_Koontz@nps.gov.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2977 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2977

To prohibit the use of Department of Justice funds for the prosecution 
 in Article III courts of the United States of individuals involved in 
               the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2010

  Mr. Graham (for himself, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Webb, Mr. McCain, Mrs. 
 Lincoln, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Chambliss, Ms. Collins, Mr. McConnell, Mr. 
 Cornyn, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Corker, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Coburn, 
  Mr. Grassley, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Roberts, Mr. 
  Alexander, Mr. Pryor, and Mr. Thune) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of Department of Justice funds for the prosecution 
 in Article III courts of the United States of individuals involved in 
               the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FUNDS FOR 
              PROSECUTION IN ARTICLE III COURTS OF INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED 
              IN THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, TERRORIST ATTACKS.

    (a) Prohibition on Use of Funds for Prosecution of 9/11 Terrorists 
in Article III Courts.--None of the funds appropriated or otherwise 
made available for the Department of Justice may be obligated or 
expended to commence or continue the prosecution in an Article III 
court of the United States of an individual described in subsection (b) 
for any offense that may be prosecuted by military commission under 
chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code (as amended by the Military 
Commissions Act of 2009 (title XVIII of Public Law 111-84)).
    (b) Covered Individuals.--An individual described in this 
subsection is an individual suspected of planning, authorizing, 
organizing, committing, or aiding the attacks on the United States and 
its citizens that occurred on September 11, 2001, who--
            (1) is not a citizen of the United States; and
            (2) is subject to jurisdiction under chapter 47A of title 
        10, United States Code (as amended by the Military Commissions 
        Act of 2009).
    (c) Article III Court of the United States Defined.--In this 
section, the term ``Article III court of the United States'' means a 
court of the United States established under Article III of the 
Constitution of the United States.
                                 <all>
```