alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Mark L.
Weinstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.



|                    
|--------------------
|                    
|Dated:  May 23, 2003

---

|* |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Randall L. Herrel, Sr., in my capacity as Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Ashworth, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) the Quarterly Report of the Registrant, on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended July 31, 2002 to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



Dated:  September 13, 2002                   /s/ Randall L. Herrel, Sr.
                                             Randall L. Herrel, Sr.,
                                             Chairman, President and Chief
                                             Executive Officer
exv4w1



 






Exhibit 4.1








	INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA




	COMMON STOCK




	NO PAR VALUE




	: THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE




	IN CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA OR NEW YORK. NEW YORK




	CUSIP. 820280 10 5




	SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS




	HE SHAW GROUP INC.
No. 946.

#### Clise et al., Executors, *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

March 30, 1942.

*Mr. Warren H. Lewis*for petitioners. *Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark,*and *Messrs. J. Louis Monarch*and *J. M. Jones*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2660 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2660

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on yttrium oxide phosphor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on yttrium oxide phosphor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. YTTRIUM OXIDE PHOSPHOR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.63 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to yttrium oxide phosphor) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 131252 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131252 COA: 268334 Monroe CC: 05-034318-FH JOHN HOWARD MINNEY, II, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
#### Daroyce Lamont MOSLEY, Petitioner-Appellant v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-70045.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 22, 2009.

F. Clinton Broden, Broden & Mickelsen, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner-Appellant.

*395Tina J. Miranda, Office of the Attorney General, Postconviction Litigation Div., Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED. STATES

PER CURIAM: *

Daroyce Mosley’s court-appointed counsel represented Mosley in filing a petition for clemency with the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. Counsel sought reimbursement in the amount of $6,892.69 for such representation under 18 U.S.C. § 3599(e). Relying on this Court’s decision in *Clark v. Johnson,*278 F.3d 459, 462-63 (5th Cir.2002), that compensation to court-appointed counsel was unavailable for representation in state clemency proceedings, the district court denied reimbursement, and we affirmed.

On petition for writ of certiorari, *Mosley v. Quarterman,*— U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1905, 173 L.Ed.2d 1055 (2009), the Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of *Harbison v. Bell,*which held that “ § 3599 authorizes federally appointed counsel to represent their clients in state clemency proceedings and entitles them to compensation for that representation.” -U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 1481, 1491, 173 L.Ed.2d 347 (2009). We therefore VACATE the district court’s denial of compensation and REMAND for further consideration in light of *Harbison.*

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.20(b)

[BANK OF AMERICA LOGO]         
                                                          AMENDMENT TO DOCUMENTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   FIRST AMENDMENT TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT

This First Amendment to Business Loan Agreement is entered into as of October 
1, 1998, between Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association 
("Bank") and Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. ("Borrower").

                                    RECITALS

A.  WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower have entered into that certain Business Loan 
Agreement dated June 9, 1998, (the "Agreement"); and

B.  WHEREAS, Borrower and Bank desire to amend certain terms and provisions of 
said Agreement as more specifically hereinafter set forth.

                                     AGREED

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, Bank and Borrower 
mutually agree to amend said Agreement as follows:

1.  Paragraph 7.11 (Dividends) of the Agreement, is amended in the entirety to 
    read as follows:

    7.11  DIVIDENDS.  Not to declare or pay any dividends on any of its shares
    except dividends payable in capital stock of the Borrower. The Borrower not
    to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for value any of its shares of
    common stock currently held in the open market, or create any sinking fund
    in relation thereto, in an amount exceeding 750,000 shares of common stock.

This amendment will become effective as of October 1, 1998, the ("Effective 
Date"), provided that each of the following conditions precedent have been 
satisfied:

     The Bank has received from the Borrower's duly executed original of this 
Amendment.

Except as provided in this Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the 
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

This Amendment shall be effective between the parties as of the date hereof. 
The Agreement as amended hereby, shall hereinafter constitute the Agreement 
between the parties.


                                                                               1
<PAGE>   2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties hereto as of
the date first written above.

BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS      VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
ASSOCIATION



/s/ SEAN DICKES                                 /s/ PIERRE SICE
----------------------------------              ------------------------------
By:  Sean Dickes, Vice President                By: Pierre Sice, Vice President,
                                                Chief Financial Officer








                                                                              2
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00009-CV

Salvador Zavala

v.

M. Matthew, et al.

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of Bee County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-16-1314-CV-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant, Salvador Zavala. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 4, 2018
#### People of the State of New York ex rel. Kay F. Skinner et al., Petitioners, on Behalf of Rodney Steven Skinner, Appellant, v William J. Connolly, Respondent.

[961 NYS2d 799]

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated January 27, 2010, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the instant habeas corpus petition and dismissed the proceeding. “A ‘writ of habeas corpus may not be used to review questions already decided or, absent reasons of practicality and necessity, questions that could have been raised by direct appeal or by a collateral attack in the court of the petitioner’s conviction’ ” *(People ex rel. Barnes v Fischer,*303 AD2d 526, 526 [2003], quoting *People ex rel. Pearson v Garvin,*211 AD2d 690, 691 [1995]; *see People ex rel. Almeyda v Schultz,*18 AD3d 582 [2005]). Further, the petition is procedurally barred where, as here, a petitioner “presents no fundamental constitutional or statutory claim that was not already reviewed on direct appeal or on his [or her] CPL 440.10 motion and would warrant departure from traditional, orderly process” *(People ex rel. Pearson v Garvin,*211 AD2d at 691).

Dillon, J.E, Angiolillo, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. ER06-615-011; ER06-615-012; ER07-1257-000]

                    On September 15, 2009, the Commission issued a notice in the above-captioned proceeding,[1]                                          seeking comments from parties on the need for Commission staff to convene a technical conference as directed in                     *Cal Indep. Sys. Operator Corp.,*                     122 FERC ¶ 61,271 (2008). Comments were submitted by the Indicated Parties,[2]                                          Western Power Trading Forum, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the California Independent System Operator Corporation, and Southern California Edison Company. Upon consideration, the Commission will defer holding a technical conference pending further notice.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Notice Seeking Comment on Need for Technical Conference, Docket Nos. ER06-615-011,                         *et al.*                         (Sept. 15, 2009).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             Indicated Parties include the California Municipal Utilities Association, Silicon Valley Power, M-S-R Public Power Agency, Transmission Agency of Northern California, Modesto Irrigation District, Bay Area Municipal Transmission Group, Northern California Power Agency, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, the Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, California, and the City and County of San Francisco, California.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E9-25618 Filed 10-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit
32

CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The accompanying
 Rimage Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December
 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information
 contained in the accompanying report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                 

|               |                                       
|-------------- | --------------------------------------
|March 24, 2011 | /s/ Sherman L. Black                  
|               | President, Chief Executive Officer and
|               | Chief Operating Officer               
|               |                                       
|               | /s/ James R. Stewart                  
|               | Chief Financial Officer               

9

---
No. 864.

#### Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. *v.*City of Sulphur.

February 9, 1942.

*Mr. F. A. Rittenhouse*for petitioner. *Mr. H. A. Ledbetter*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2597 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sound isolating earphones with 

detachable cable. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mrs. HUTCHISON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sound isolating 

earphones with detachable cable. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SOUND ISOLATING EARPHONES WITH 

4 DETACHABLE CABLE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2597 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Single-driver sound isolating 

earphones with skinned (nonporous) slow-recovery foam 

sleeves, detachable cable and 

repeatable operating range of 

20 Hz to 16 kHz (provided 

for in subheading 

8518.30.2000) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                 766,718
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           67,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                            32,623
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             0
<PP&E>                                                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       2,370,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        0
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                           2,482,849
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         2,370,652
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       708,965
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       280,434
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         4,995
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      32,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        391,086
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    391,086
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           391,086
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0
        


</TABLE>
#### S.M. Pires, Appellant, v Frota Oceanica Brasileira, S.A., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Submitted December 6, 2010;

decided February 15, 2011

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order as pertains to the motion in that Court for the imposition of sanctions, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remaining portions of the order do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ted I. Kaminer, Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.        Dated: November 14, 2007 /s/ Ted I. Kaminer*   Ted I. Kaminer, Senior Vice President and Chief   Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)    *  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to us andwill be retained by us and furnished to the      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
#### In re UNITED LAST CO.

Misc. Civ. No. 7327.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Oct. 22, 1947.

John L. Hall, Claude R. Branch, Charles P. Curtis, Jr., and John B. Reigeluth (all of Choate, Hall & Stewart), of Boston, Mass., for movant.

John F. Sonnett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Grant W. Kelleher, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and C Worth Rowley, Jr., Alfred Karsted, and Edward M. Feeney, Sp. Attys., all of Boston, Mass., for the United States.

SWEENEY, District Judge.

This subpoena duces tecum addressed to the movant, United Last Company, calls for the production of certain papers passing between it and another named company, during the period from January 1, 1927, to January 1, 1933.

The motion to quash is granted for the reason that the period sought to be covered by the subpoena is well beyond what might be termed a reasonable and unoppressive period. See this Court’s decision today in Re United Shoe Machinery Corporation, 7 F.Supp. 756.