alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# BLM Fire Investigation

## BLM Fire Investigation

Fire investigators are trained in specialized skills and techniques, using the scientific method in determining the origin and cause of a fire.   

Working with law enforcement, fire crews, and all jurisdictional agencies, fire investigators document the cause of the fire and all relevant facts. The agency reviews investigations to determine the appropriate action to take. Actions may include recovering costs via administrative authority, prevention or mitigation measures, education campaigns, or pursuing civil/criminal suits.

Learn more about job openings and how to apply for a BLM fire job on USAJOBS.

### Apply for BLM Wildland Firefighting Positions

## BLM

-  Recruitment Toolkit 
-  Podcasts 
-  BLM Aviation Program 
-  BLM Aviation Support Positions 
-  BLM Crews 
-  BLM Engine Crews 
-  BLM Fire Management 
-  BLM Fire Prevention and Education 
-  BLM Fire Support 
-  BLM Fire Training 
-  BLM Dispatchers 
-  BLM Fire Investigation 
-  BLM Fuels Crews 
-  BLM Fuels Management Program 
-  BLM Helitack Crews 
-  BLM Alaska Smokejumpers 
-  Great Basin Smokejumpers 
-  Operational Medical Support Program
**Justification for Exception Position 1 (level AD-A) hired under the DOI AD Hiring Authority**

*Exception Position 1 requires no specialized skills or training.  The job requires the performance of simple, routine, repetitive work tasks under close supervision or requires following oral or written specific step-by-step instructions.*

**NPS hiring unit:**

**Title of Exception Position:**

**Objective or purpose of position:**

**Duties:**

**Position will be supervised by (provide position title):**

**Qualifications/training of AD employee that justifies or supports hiring him/her into this position:**

_____________________________________________		____________________________

**Name of person providing this description (please print)	Date**

_____________________________________________		____________________________

**Signature approval of NPS National Incident Bus. Lead		Date**

# image1.png
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2689 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2689

      To reduce the temporary suspension of duty on b-Cyfluthrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To reduce the temporary suspension of duty on b-Cyfluthrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. B-CYFLUTHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.68 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to b-Cyfluthrin) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Free'' and inserting ``4.8%''; and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1127-000]


Wheelabrator South Broward Inc.; Supplemental Notice that Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

May 21, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Wheelabrator South Broward Inc.'s application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is June 10, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC, 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82c4c7d0c1cdeceeebece7d1f7f2f2edf0f6c2e4e7f0e1ace5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88cecddacbc7e6e4e1e6eddbfdf8f8e7fafcc8eeedfaeba6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>. or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12439 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Appendix 1**

**Fire and Aviation Preparedness Review Guide**

**Suggested Drill**

**Drill #9*****Fire and Aviation Preparedness Review Guide***

**Portable Pump Exercise**

April 2000

A-

Drill 9-1Revised 2008
[944 NE2d 1142, 919 NYS2d 503]

#### In the Matter of Eternal Flame of Hope Ministries, Inc., Respondent, v Lori King, as Assessor of the Town of Highland, et al., Appellants.

Decided February 22, 2011

*779APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Drew, Davidoff & Edwards Law Offices, LLP,*Monticello *(Michael Davidoff of*counsel), for appellants.

*Kalter, Kaplan, Zeigler & Forman,*Woodbourne *(Terry S. Forman*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.

Because petitioner is a religious organization utilizing the subject property to further the religious purposes for which it was organized, petitioner is entitled to a real property tax exemption for the property *(see*RPTL 420-a [1] [a]). The Town has not demonstrated an existing zoning violation so as to bar the exemption *(cf. Matter of Oxford Group-Moral Re-Armament, MRA, Inc. v Allen,*309 NY 744 [1955]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

*780On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Full HouseResorts, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report’), I, Andre M. Hilliou, ChiefExecutive Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.

 

 
| Dated: March 26, 2004 | By:    |   /s/   ANDRE M.  HILLIOU           . |   |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       |   | Andre M. Hilliou                                                                                                 |   |
|                       |   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                          |   |

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Full HouseResorts, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) I, Greg Violette, ChiefFinancial Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.

 

 
| Dated: March 26, 2004 | By:    |  /s/   GREG  VIOLETTE           . |   |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       |   | Greg Violette                                                                                           |   |
|                       |   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                 |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Packaging and Logistic Group, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Owen Naccarato


Owen Naccarato


Chief Financial Officer
Document

Exhibit 10.1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of June 10, 2022 by and between Umesh Kasbekar (“Consultant”) and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Company and Consultant are parties to that certain Consulting Agreement dated March 3, 2020 (the “Consulting Agreement”) and now desire to amend the Consulting Agreement to increase the fees payable to Consultant for the consulting services he renders to the Company. 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth below the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.Section 2(b) of the Agreement is amended in its entirety effective as of July 6, 2022  to read as follows:
(b)Consulting Fees.  In consideration for the services to rendered by Consultant hereunder, during the term of this Agreement the Company agrees to pay to Consultant a consulting fee (the “Consulting Fee”) at an annual rate of $310,000.  The Consulting Fee shall be paid to Consultant in substantially equal installments once per month.  The Consulting Fee shall be evaluated periodically and remain subject to adjustment by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) or the compensation committee of the Board.  In addition to the Consulting Fee, the Company shall pay or reimburse Consultant for all reasonable bona fide out-of-pocket, third-party business expenses incurred by Consultant in the performance of services under this Agreement in accordance with expense reimbursement plans and policies in effect from time to time for consultants to the Company generally.
2.Except as expressly or by necessary implication amended by this Amendment, the Consulting Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.  


[Signatures on Following Page]
















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Consultant have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


									
		COMPANY:

			
		COCA-COLA CONSOLIDATED, INC.
			
		By:	/s/ E. Beauregarde Fisher III
			E. Beauregarde Fisher III,
			Executive Vice President




									
		CONSULTANT:
			
			/s/ Umesh Kasbekar
			Umesh Kasbekar
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED 3-31-97 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,468
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (338)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,206
<PP&E>                                          36,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,057)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,708
<BONDS>                                        125,881
<COMMON>                                           161
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,906
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,059
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,658
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (25,285)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,800)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,148)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,148)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,148)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                              420,600
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       213,798
<ALLOWANCES>                        (10,000)
<INVENTORY>                          12,751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    651,339
<PP&E>                              628,475
<DEPRECIATION>                     (359,334)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      935,396
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               577,318
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             50,156
<OTHER-SE>                          307,922
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        935,396
<SALES>                           1,417,131
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  1,417,131
<CGS>                               948,178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       948,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  1,616,226
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   (2,195)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (923,671)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,140,549)
<DISCONTINUED>                      216,878
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (923,671)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.18)
        


</TABLE>
#### Citidress II Corp., Appellant, v Ira Tokayer, Respondent. (And a Related Action.)

[962 NYS2d 691]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), entered August 22, 2011, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7), and denied its cross motion for leave to amend the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court should not have directed the dismissal of the causes of action based on legal malpractice and breach of contract pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1). The documentary evidence submitted did not resolve all factual issues as a matter of law, and did not conclusively dispose of the claims asserted by the plaintiff *(see Beal Sav. Bank v Sommer,*8 NY3d 318, 324 [2007]; *AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. Bank & Trust Co.,*5 NY3d 582, 590-591 [2005]; *McCue v County of Westchester,*18 AD3d 830, 831 [2005]).

However, the Supreme Court properly determined that the complaint failed to state a cause of action. Speculative contentions about what might have happened had the defendant attorney (hereinafter the defendant) taken a different approach in litigating a case on behalf of the plaintiff were not sufficient to support the plaintiff’s allegations of legal malpractice *(see Humbert v Allen,*89 AD3d 804 [2011]; *Dempster v Liotti,*86 AD3d 169, 180 [2011]; *Wald v Berwitz,*62 AD3d 786 [2009]). Since the plaintiff failed to plead specific facts showing causation and damages, its claims of legal malpractice failed to state *799a cause of action *(see Kuzmin v Nevsky,*74 AD3d 896, 898 [2010]; *Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C.,*21 AD3d 1082, 1083 [2005]). Moreover, the claims alleging breach of contract also failed to state a cause of action. These claims are duplicative of the legal malpractice cause of action because they arise from the same facts as those underlying the legal malpractice cause of action, and do not allege distinct damages *(see Soni v Pryor,*102 AD3d 856 [2013]; *Ofman v Katz,*89 AD3d 909, 911 [2011]).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions in connection with the defendant’s motion are without merit.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7).

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) for leave to amend the complaint, since the proposed amendment was palpably insufficient and patently devoid of merit *(see Scott v Fields,*85 AD3d 756, 759 [2011]).

Dillon, J.P, Balkin, Dickerson and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
    <meta name="robots" content="noindex">
    <title>Meet the Director - NIDDK</title>
    
<meta name="VIcurrentDateTime" content="638490776841039503" />
<meta name="VirtualFolder" content="/" />
<script type="text/javascript" src="/layouts/system/VisitorIdentification.js"></script>

</head>
<body>
    <div></div>
</body>
</html>
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(No. 333-107683, No. 333-61503, No. 33-61612 and No. 333-129887) pertaining to the Sport Chalet,Inc. Employee Retirement Savings Plan and the Sport Chalet, Inc. 1992 Incentive Award Plan, and the2004 Equity Incentive Plan of our report dated June 19, 2006, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Sport Chalet, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended March 31, 2006.     /s/ Moss Adams LLP   Los Angeles, California  June 19, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing of Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of
LanOptics Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the period ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Meir D. Burstin, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/S/ Meir D. Burstin*
--------------------
Meir D. Burstin
Principal Executive Officer

December 22, 2004

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.