alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Yimi Desay, an Infant, by Her Mother and Legal Guardian, Sara Yard, et al., Appellants, v COPO Management, LLC, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[963 NYS2d 79]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, *454J.), entered January 25, 2012, which granted the motions of defendants COPO Management LLC (COPO), the City of New York and the New York City Department of Education (collectively City) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff Yimi Desay was allegedly bitten by a pit bull that entered a public park, owned and operated by the City, through a hole in the fence between the park and the adjacent premises, which is owned by COPO. The dog belonged to a tenant in COPO’s premises.

COPO established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by presenting the testimony of its sole member who stated that he had no knowledge of the dog’s existence, let alone its vicious propensities, until after it bit Desay (see *Strunk v Zoltanski,*62 NY2d 572, 575 [1984]; *Smedley v Ellinwood,*21 AD3d 676 [3d Dept 2005]). Even if COPO could be deemed to have constructive knowledge of the dog’s existence by virtue of its regular inspections of the premises, such knowledge is insufficient to impute knowledge of vicious propensities *(see Balia v Jones,*305 AD2d 1103 [4th Dept 2003]). Moreover, it is undisputed that the bite did not occur on COPO’s premises *(see Walker v Gold,*70 AD3d 1349 [4th Dept 2010], *lv denied*14 NY3d 712 [2010]).

Plaintiffs argument that COPO was vicariously liable based upon the theory that the dog’s owner, COPO’s tenant, was COPO’s agent, is unavailing, since it was advanced for the first time in opposition to COPO’s motion *(see Ostrov v Rozbruch,*91 AD3d 147, 154 [1st Dept 2012]), and is based upon a mischaracterization of the testimony.

Dismissal of the complaint as against the City was also proper. Even assuming that the City knew or should have known that a vicious dog was present at the adjacent premises, it was not foreseeable that because a hole in the fence existed, a vicious animal would enter the playground through the hole and attack a person on the premises *(see Di Ponzio v Riordan,*89 NY2d 578, 585 [1997]; *Lee v New York City Hous. Auth.,*25 AD3d 214, 217 [1st Dept 2005], *lu denied 6*NY3d 708 [2006]). Here, the dog owner’s failure to adequately restrain the dog proximately caused Desay’s injuries, and was a superceding or intervening occurrence that broke any causal nexus between the hole in the fence and Desay’s injuries *(see e.g. Campbell v Central N.Y. Regional Transp. Auth.,*7 NY3d 819, 820-821 [2006]; *Maheshwari v City of New York,*2 NY3d 288, 295 [2004]).

Concur— Tom, J.P, Andrias, Saxe, Abdus-Salaam and Gische, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned, Mark L. Weinstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.

 

|                              |   |   |                                                                                             |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |   |   | /s/ MARK L. WEINSTEIN*                                                                           |
|                              |   |   |                                                                                                  |
| Dated:  August 14, 2003 |   |   | **Mark L. Weinstein, President and Chief****Executive Officer****(Principal Executive Officer)** |

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
Order entered October 20 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01463
- CV CREDIT SUISSE AG, CA YMAN ISLANDS BRANCH AND CREDIT SUISSE

SECURITIES (USA) LLC , Appellant s

V. CLAYMORE HOLDINGS, L LC, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 07858
- G



### O RDER
We GRANT the parties ’ October 18, 2016 joint motion for extension of time to file appellee’s brief an d cross

- appellees’ brief. We ORDER appellee’s brief and cross

- appellees’
brief to be filed no later than November 28, 2016 and their reply briefs to be filed no later than January 18, 2017.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2639 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on butanedioic acid, dimethyl 

ester, polymer with 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6,-tetramethyl-1-piperidineethanol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SESSIONS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on butanedioic 

acid, dimethyl ester, polymer with 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6,- 

tetramethyl-1-piperidineethanol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BUTANEDIOIC ACID, DIMETHYL ESTER, POLY4 MER WITH 4-HYDROXY-2,2,6,6,-TETRAMETHYL5 1-PIPERIDINEETHANOL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.47 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 butanedioic acid, dimethyl ester, polymer with 4-hydroxy9 2,2,6,6,-tetramethyl-1-piperidineethanol) is amended by 

10 striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2639 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### NYCTL 1998-2 Trust et al., Plaintiffs, v Andrea Ellen Sack, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Guila Feinberg, Nonparty Respondent.

Submitted January 3, 2011;

decided March 24, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  eTotalSource,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date  May 12, 2005                     By: /s/ Terry Eilers
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Terry Eilers
                                           Title: President and Chief Executive
                                                  Officer

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentications,   acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written    statement    required   by   Section   906,    has   been    provided
_______________________ and will be retained by _______________ and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Shared Inbox: SM.FS.greeningfire@usda.gov

Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/managing-land/fire/sustainable-ops

National Greening Fire Team

Vision: Achieving net zero waste at all large fire incidents by 2030

Mission: Integrating sustainable operation's best management practices into the fire community

LARA

1

Established in 2011, GFT members are a combination of seasonal, permanent and interagency employees.

On-Site Incident Recycling Blanket Purchase Agreement

Become a Greening Fire Team Ambassador

Priority areas include:

Waste reduction

Renewable energy

Outreach and Education

How PIO’s Can Join the GFT Effort: 

Opt-in to receiving Greening Fire Team Bulletins and integrate/cross-pollinate key content in local communications.

On incidents, help share sustainability successes by working with recycling vendors to develop press releases.

Close the loop with the Greening Fire Team when a sustainability success is covered by emailing our Shared Inbox.

Post GFT information on bulletin boards.

# image1.png

# image2.jpg
No. 161.

#### Stewart, Administrator, *v.*Southern Railway Co.

March 9, 1942.

*Per Curiam:*

Upon petition for rehearing, it appearing that the case has been settled, the petition is granted and the judgment entered February 16, 1942, 315 U. S. 283, is vacated. The judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed with costs and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the suit as moot.
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of KT Corporation

(As of December 31, 2006)



|                                       |  |                              
|-------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                                   |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|KT Freetel Co., Ltd.                   |  | Korea                        
|KT Hitel Co., Ltd.                     |  | Korea                        
|KT Submarine Co., Ltd.                 |  | Korea                        
|KT Powertel Co., Ltd.                  |  | Korea                        
|KT Networks Corporation                |  | Korea                        
|KT Linkus Co., Ltd.                    |  | Korea                        
|KT Commerce Inc.                       |  | Korea                        
|KTF Technologies Inc.                  |  | Korea                        
|KTF M Hows                             |  | Korea                        
|Korea Telecom America, Inc.            |  | U.S.A.                       
|Korea Telecom Philippines, Inc.        |  | Philippines                  
|New Telephone Company, Inc.            |  | Russia                       
|Korea Telecom Japan Co., Ltd.          |  | Japan                        
|KT China Co., Ltd.                     |  | China                        
|KT Internal Venture Fund No. 2         |  | Korea                        
|KT Telecom Venture Fund No. 1          |  | Korea                        
|KT Rental Co., Ltd.                    |  | Korea                        
|KT Capital Co., Ltd.                   |  | Korea                        
|Sidus FNH Corporation                  |  | Korea                        
|PT. KTF Indonesia                      |  | Indonesia                    
|Sidus FNH Benex Cinema Investment Fund |  | Korea                        
|Telecop Service Co., Ltd.              |  | Korea                        
|Olive Nine Co., Ltd.                   |  | Korea
<PAGE>
 
                                 Exhibit 10.5
                                 ------------


                          AMERINST INSURANCE COMPANY

         MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT WITH VERMONT INSURANCE MANAGEMENT, INC.

                            MANAGEMENT FEE ADDENDUM
                            -----------------------


Effective July 1, 1998:

COMPANY will:
-------------

(1)  Compensate MANAGER at the rate of $91,160 per annum as management fees for
     the services to be provided as set out in the AGREEMENT and schedule of
     which the Addendum is a part.

(2)  Cause the above fee to be paid in quarterly installments in advance at the
     beginning of each calendar quarter.


WITNESS:                             VERMONT INSURANCE MANAGEMENT, INC.

                                     By:   /s/  Andrew Sargeant
-------------------------               ----------------------------------------
                                        Andrew Sargeant, President


WITNESS:                             AMERINST INSURANCE COMPANY

                                     By:   /s/  Norman C. Batchelder
----------------------------            ----------------------------------------
                                        Its duly authorized agent
-  Home 
        -  Research & Funding 
        -  Research Programs & Contacts 
        -  Diversity Programs 
        -  Investigator Award to Support Mentoring of Early Career Researchers from Diverse Backgrounds 

Diversity Programs
-  Diversity Supplement Program 
-  Network of Minority Health Research InvestigatorsShow child pages    -  NMRI Mentor/Mentee Program 
  -  NMRI Boards 
  -  NMRI Event Photos 
  -  NMRI Community/Faith Based Research Subgroup 
  -  Suggested Resources 
  -  NMRI Newsletters & Directory 
  -  NMRI History & Mission 
-  Travel & Scholarship AwardsShow child pages    -  NIH/National Medical Association Travel Award 
  -  NIH/Latino Medical Student Association LIDEReS in Research Travel Award 
-  Research & Training Opportunities for StudentsShow child pages    -  Short-Term Research Experience Program to Unlock Potential (STEP-UP) 
  -  Diversity Summer Research Training Program 
-  BRIDGES Consortium 
-  DiabDocs National K12 Physician Scientist Career Development Program 
-  Investigator Award to Support Mentoring of Early Career Researchers from Diverse Backgrounds 
-  NIDDK Partnerships with Professional Societies 
-  Helping to Accelerate Research Potential (HARP) 

# Investigator Award to Support Mentoring of Early Career Researchers from Diverse Backgrounds

## Purpose

The purpose of this award is to provide protected effort and resources to established, NIDDK-funded, mentors to provide high quality mentoring to graduate students and postdoctoral fellows from diverse backgrounds, including those from underrepresented groups.

RFA-DK-22-012

## Award Structure

## 

NIDDK will provide salary for levels of effort between 3-6 person-months (or 25 and 50% full-time professional effort). NIDDK will contribute up to $10,000 per year for the following expenses:
          - Mentor training courses for the PD/PI.
          - PD/PI and mentee travel to research meetings or mentorship training and networking events.
          - Registration fees for workshops, courses, or didactic training focused on career development activities for mentees.
          - Other relevant opportunities proposed by the applicant/awardee if well justified and approved by NIDDK officials.

## NIDDK Program Staff

Tracy Rankin, Ph.D.

David Saslowsky, Ph.D.

Katrina Serrano, Ph.D.

Lisa M. Spain, Ph.D.
#### In the Matter of Town of Waterford, Appellant, v New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Respondent.

Decided November 18, 2010

*907Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
      best
      of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Steve Westlund


Steve
      Westlund


Chief
      Financial Officer




May
      21,
      2007
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12695]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER09-900-001; ER09-901-001; ER09-902-001]


Sky River LLC, Victory Garden Phase IV, LLC, FPL Energy Cabazon 
Wind, LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 22, 2009.
    Take notice that on May 21, 2009, Sky River LLC, Victory Garden 
Phase IV, LLC, and FPL Energy Cabazon Wind, LLC filed an amendment to 
market-based rate tariffs.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a6c6f786965444643444f795f5a5a45585e6a4c4f5849044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="de989b8c9d91b0b2b7b0bb8dabaeaeb1acaa9eb8bbacbdf0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 29, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12695 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.2
MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14A/ 15d-14a
I, Peter L. Buzy, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, of Martek BiosciencesCorporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluations; and  c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 23, 2004
/s/ Peter L. Buzy
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall Jones,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to
      the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Randall Jones


Randall
      Jones


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      16, 2006