alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 273 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2009 

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

AN ACT 

To require the designation of the federally occupied building 

located at McKinley Avenue and Third Street, S.W., 

Canton, Ohio, as the ‘‘Ralph Regula Federal Office 

Building and Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

S 273 RFH

1 SECTION 1. RALPH REGULA FEDERAL OFFICE BUILDING 

2 AND COURTHOUSE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Administrator of General 

4 Services shall ensure that the federally occupied building 

5 located at McKinley Avenue and Third Street, S.W., Can6 ton, Ohio, is known and designated as the ‘‘Ralph Regula 

7 Federal Office Building and Courthouse’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—During the period in which the 

9 building referred to in subsection (a) is federally occupied, 

10 any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

11 or other record of the United States to that building shall 

12 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ralph Regula Federal 

13 Office Building and Courthouse’’. 

Passed the Senate January 15, 2009. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7574

EMORY G. SNELL, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LESTER RICH, Special Agent of the Bureau of

Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Charleston Division, and others as yet unknown,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Falcon B. Hawkins, Chief District

Judge. (CA-96-3422-5-11JI)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emory G. Snell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parkwood Griffith,

Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The district court properly construed Snell’s complaint as

one filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

2

PER CURIAM:

Emory G. Snell, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.*

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Snell v. Rich, No. CA-96-3422-5-11JI (D.S.C.

Sept. 30, 1998). We deny Snell’s four motions for appointment of

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


Parent
-------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

HFB Financial Corporation

                                                           State or Other
                                                           Jurisdiction of      Percentage
Subsidiaries (1)                                           Incorporation        Ownership
----------------                                           -------------        ----------
<S>                                                        <C>                     <C>
Home Federal Bank, Federal Savings Bank                    United States           100%


Subsidiary of Home Federal Bank, Federal Savings Bank

Home Service Corporation                                   Kentucky                100%

</TABLE>



---------------
(1)   The assets,  liabilities  and operations of the subsidiary are included in
      the consolidated  financial  statements  contained in the Annual Report to
      Stockholders attached hereto as an exhibit.
BLM NATIONAL FIRE TRAINING AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT 

PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND STAFF

Program Structure 

The BLM National Fire Training and Workforce Development Program (NIFC, FA-324) functions under 

the direction of the Chief, Branch of Preparedness and Suppression Operations (FA-320). FA-324 is made 

up of a Program Manager, an Assistant Program Manager, and a Writer/Editor who provide overall 

support for the BLM National Fire Training and Workforce Development Program. 

Contacts

Name Position Phone Email

Marlene Eno-Hendren Program Manager 208-387-5265 meno@blm.gov

Mark Studlarek Assistant Program Manager 208-387-5985 mskudlar@blm.gov

Pam McDonald Writer/Editor 208-387-5318 pmcdonal@blm.gov

BLM Fire Operations (internal website)
English Translation of Supplementary Agreement dated July 18, 2007



 Exhibit 10.6 
 Supplementary Agreement 
 SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT 
 ChinaEDU Corporation and Xie Changqing entered into this Supplementary Agreement as of July 18, 2007 in accordance with Section 10.3 of the Loan Agreement
entered into by the Parties as of July 15, 2005 after friendly negotiation, the Parties agree to make the following amendments to the Loan Agreement: 
  

	1.	Section 2.4 of the Loan Agreement shall be amended as: “Lender and Borrower hereby agree and acknowledge that, in the event that relevant laws permit, Borrower may
transfer the Borrower’s Equity Interest in the Company in whole to Lender or Lender’s designated persons (legal or natural persons), and shall use the income of the transfer to repay the loan”. 

  

	2.	Section 2.7 of the Loan Agreement shall be amended as: “Interest of the Loan. Lender and Borrower hereby agree and acknowledge that, unless otherwise stipulated by this
Agreement, the Loan shall be interest-free; however, in the event that the income of Borrower from the transfer of the Borrower’s Equity Interest in the Company in whole to Lender or Lender’s designated persons (legal or natural persons)
is higher than the principal of the Loan, the difference shall be deemed the interest of the Loan under relevant laws then effective and shall be paid by Borrower to Lender.” 

 The Parties hereby also agree: 
  

	1.	Other clauses of the Loan Agreement shall remain the same. 

  

	2.	This Supplementary Agreement shall be effective upon being signed and/or affixed the official seals by the Parties. This Supplementary Agreement is made in two copies with equal
legal validity, each Party holding one copy. 

  

	3.	The validity of this Supplementary Agreement shall be retroacted to July 15, 2005. 

  

			
	ChinaEDU Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Huang Bo

	Name:	 	Huang Bo
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Xie Changqing

	Name:	 	Xie Changqing
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Warren Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31,
2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, James A. Watt, Chief Executive Officer and Frank T. Smith, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:    May 26, 2016



/s/ James A. WattName:

James A. WattTitle:

Chief Executive Officer/s/ Frank T. SmithName:

Frank T. SmithTitle:

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,135,133
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,522
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,165,459
<PP&E>                                         395,637
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,733,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,304,868
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     428,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,733,598
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               163,871
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  281,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (24,049,347)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             23,930,996
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         23,930,996
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (195,500)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                23,735,496
<EPS-BASIC>                                   260.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   260.98


</TABLE>
#### State v. Scott

Case below: 180 N.C. App. 462

No. 016P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-300)

Denied 03/08/07
Exhibit 23





               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the incorporation  by  reference  in  the
Registration  Statements  on  Form S-8  (Nos. 33-55894,  33-68898
333-09390  and  333-38652)   and   Form S-3   (Nos. 33-94666  and
333-1988) of Graphic Packaging  International Corporation  of our
report   dated   February 23, 2001   relating to   the  financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this
Form 10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 23, 2001
No. 853.

#### Shick *v.*Goodman, Trustee.

February 16, 1942.

*Mr. Edwin C. Emhardt*for petitioner. *Mr. Charles H. Weidner*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2608 

To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on certain pesticide chemical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on certain 

pesticide chemical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PESTICIDE CHEMICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.92 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain pesticide chemical) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2608 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5
 
                         MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT ADDENDUM
                         -----------------------------


Addendum to the Management Agreement effective July 1, 1994, between Risk
Retention Management, Inc. and AmerInst Insurance Company.

I. The Management Fee Addendum portion of the Addenda to Agreement is hereby
amended to read in its entirety as follows:

MANAGEMENT FEE ADDENDUM
-----------------------

COMPANY will:

(1)  Effective July 1, 1996, the COMPANY will compensate MANAGER at the rate of
     $82,687.50 per annum.

(2)  Cause the above agreement to be paid in quarterly installments in advance
     at the beginning of each calendar quarter.

(3)  Reimburse MANAGER for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred during the
     management of the COMPANY including:  courier and express mail service;
     long distance telephone calls; travel and meeting expenses incurred at the
     request of the COMPANY; costs of COMPANY stationery; filing fees; and
     similar expenses.

COMPANY agrees that special projects will be invoiced separately at agreed upon
fees or rates.

COMPANY also agrees that Michael T. Rogers' attendance at Board meetings is only
required twice a year.  Michael T. Rogers' attendance at Board meetings more
than twice a year will incur a fee of $1,200 per attendance.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Addendum this 26th day
of August, 1996.
                                              USA RISK SERVICES, INC. (Formerly
WITNESS:                                      RISK RETENTION MANAGEMENT, INC.)

 /s/ Rebecca J. Aitchison                 By:  /s/ Michael T. Rogers
-----------------------------------          --------------------------------
                                                   Michael T. Rogers
                                                   Vice President

WITNESS:                                      AMERINST INSURANCE COMPANY

 /s/ Priscilla Batchelder                 By:  /s/ Norman Batchelder
-----------------------------------            --------------------------------
                                                   Norman Batchelder, President

 /s/ Adrienne L. Runge                    By:  /s/ Ronald S. Katch
-----------------------------------            --------------------------------
                                                   Ronald S. Katch, Treasurer
No. 934.

#### Taylor et al. *v.*Provident Irrigation District.

March 30, 1942.

*Mr. W. Coburn Cook*for petitioners. *Mr. George R. Freeman*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Order filed August 12, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00173-CV

____________

MICHAEL SLEEMAN, Appellant

V.

ESTHER LAVERNE CHUDLEIGH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-29742

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due July 30, 2014. No brief or motion for extension of 

time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before September 9, 

2014, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MANUEL DE JESUS ASIJ GARCIA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71736

Agency No. A099-066-053

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Manuel de Jesus Asij Garcia, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal

proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

FILED

SEP 14 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-71736

We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and review de

novo claims of due process violations. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785,

791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The agency acted within its discretion in denying Asij Garcia’s motion to

reopen because he did not establish that his failure to appear inside the courtroom

was on account of exceptional circumstances. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii). It

follows that his due process claim fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th

Cir. 2000).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2569 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2569

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on methy methyoxyacetate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

   Mr. Bond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on methy methyoxyacetate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHY METHYOXYACETATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.04 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to methy methyoxyacetate) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2502 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2502

               To suspend temporarily the duty on Dianil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To suspend temporarily the duty on Dianil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIANIL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       2,5-Cyclohexadiene- Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          1,4-dione-2,5-                                                     31/2011.......
                          dichloro-3,6-
                          bis[(9-ethyl-9H-
                          carbazol-3-
                          yl)amino]
                          (Dianil) (CAS No.
                          80546-37-8)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2933.99.79)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Paul S. Shipman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Redhook Ale Brewery, Incorporated; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsa d procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions); (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 23, 2007             BY: /s/ Paul S. Shipman             Paul S. Shipman          *Chief Executive Officer and*          *Chairman of the Board*
<PAGE>

[LETTERHEAD]

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                    CONSENT OF LEVINE, HUGHES & MITHUEN, INC.


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-88948, No. 333-26221 and No. 333-42787 on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 333-69345 on Form S-3 of Sport-Haley, Inc., of our report dated
September 7, 1999 on the financial statements of Sport-Haley, Inc., appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sport-Haley, Inc. for the year ended June 30,
1999.

                          /s/ Levine, Hughes & Mithuen, Inc.