alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

_______________________________

06

- 20

- 00049

- CR

_______________________________

CORY JOHNSON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 276th District Court

Titus County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR19,187

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### ME MORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Cory Johnson has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. As authorized by Rule

42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.2(a).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: August 10, 2020

Date Decided: August 11, 2020

Do Not Publish
# IMSR Map

This map depicts large fires listed on the most current IMSR (click here to access a larger, interactive map).  The authoritative IMSR data for these fires can also be viewed, downloaded, or linked (via API) on the NIFC Open Data site, which hosts the feature layers for the current IMSR's incidents as well as the final occurrence for previous IMSRs' incidents.

For any questions relating to the datasets hosted on NIFC Open Data, please fill out the following contact form.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Grants 
-  Funding Opportunities 

# Higher Education Challenge Grants Program

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

Projects supported by the Higher Education Challenge Grants Program will: (1) address a state, regional, national, or international educational need; (2) involve a creative or non-traditional approach toward addressing that need that can serve as a model to others; (3) encourage and facilitate better working relationships in the university science and education community, as well as between universities and the private sector, to enhance program quality and supplement available resources; and (4) result in benefits that will likely transcend the project duration and USDA support.

The technical assistance webinar related to this FY 2024 funding opportunity is now scheduled. Please see details about the webinar, including the registration link, date, and time, via the technical assistance webinar button below. The recording and supporting documents will also be posted to this page after the event.

Apply For GrantDownload RFATechnical Assistance Webinar

NIFA Language Access Services

Environmental and Resource Economics Programs 

Farm Safety

Higher Education Challenge (HEC) Grants Program

Rangelands and Grasslands Programs

Soil Programs

Sustainable Development Programs

a) U.S. public or private, nonprofit colleges/universities offering baccalaureate or 1st professional degree in at least one discipline/area of food & agricultural sciences; b) land-grant colleges/universities (including those in Insular Areas); c) colleges/universities having significant minority enrollments and demonstrable capacity to teach food and agricultural sciences; and d) colleges/universities having demonstrable capacity to teach food and agricultural sciences.

Thursday, January 11, 2024

Solomon Haile, Ph.D.

Tuesday, March 5, 2024

grantapplicationquestions@usda.gov

FY23-HEC-RFA-508-F.pdf(pdf - 456.8 KB)

Education
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2557 

To suspend temporarily the duty on metsulfuron-methyl. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. BURRIS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on metsulfuron-methyl. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METSULFURON-METHYL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Methyl 2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6- 

methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) 

amino]carbonyl]amino] 

sulfonyl]benzoate (CAS No. 

74223–64–6), in pure form 

or in forms or packings for 

retail sale, preparations or 

articles (provided for in subheadings 2935.00.75 or 

3808.30.15) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2557 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Young Chen, Respondent, v Ruihua Li, Appellant.

Submitted August 16, 2010;

decided October 21, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that *875the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
U.S. FOREST SERVICE URGES PUBLIC TO CONTACT AGENCY BEFORE FLYING DRONES ON NATIONAL FORESTS AND GRASSLANDS 

TO PREVENT ACCIDENTS 

	The U.S. Forest Service is urging members of the public who are planning to fly Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), also known as “drones,” on National Forests and Grasslands to contact the local Ranger District office ahead of time to find out whether any agency natural resource management flights are scheduled to prevent accidents. 

	U.S. Forest Service airplanes and helicopters fly regularly over National Forest System lands at low altitudes to perform a variety of natural resource management missions. These include aerial surveys to detect forest insect and disease outbreaks, remote sensing to acquire aerial images and data of forests and grasslands, and aerial spraying to control or eradicate major forest pests. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety guidelines instruct members of the public to fly drones at or below 400 feet. That is about the same altitude at which U.S. Forest Service aircraft often fly to perform natural resource management missions, which creates the potential for an accident. 

	“It would be a real tragedy if a member of the public was flying a drone for fun on a National Forest or Grassland and either collided with a U.S. Forest Service aircraft or caused a U.S. Forest Service pilot to be distracted and crash, resulting in serious injuries or fatalities,” said (Name), (Title), with the U.S. Forest Service. “We are asking the public to work with us to help prevent that from happening.”

	The U.S. Forest Service urges members of the public to contact the local Ranger District where they want to fly a drone beforehand to see if any agency natural resource management missions are planned during the time they want to fly and if so, to please plan on flying at another time or location. Contact information for all U.S. Forest Service offices in the U.S. is located at www.fs.fed.us in the “Find a Forest or Grassland” section. Information about U.S. Forest Service natural resource management flights is also available on several websites, including the FAA PilotWeb site https://pilotweb.nas.faa.gov/PilotWeb/http://tfr.faa.gov/tfr_map_ims/html/ and the Defense Internet Notam Service (DINS) https://www.notams.faa.gov/dinsQueryWeb/

###
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry A. Goldstone, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Larry A. Goldstone               
|Larry A. Goldstone                   
|President and Chief Operating Officer
|March 6, 2006
Exhibit   32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westford Technology Ventures, L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jeffery T. Hamilton, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.



/s/ Jeffrey T. Hamilton
-----------------------
Jeffery T. Hamilton
President, Hamilton Capital Management, Inc.

December 9, 2003
# SEAT Driver Duty Day Log 2018

SEAT Support Driver Duty Day Log Form 2018 &"Arial,Bold"Required
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2829 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the cost of labor 

for building envelope improvements to be included for purposes of the 

nonbusiness energy property tax credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 3, 2009 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Ms. STABENOW, and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

cost of labor for building envelope improvements to be 

included for purposes of the nonbusiness energy property 

tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION TO NONBUSINESS ENERGY 

4 PROPERTY CREDIT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 25C(c) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by add7 ing at the end the following flush sentence: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2829 IS

1 ‘‘Such term includes expenditures for labor costs 

2 properly allocable to the onsite preparation, assem3 bly, or original installation of the component.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Orlando MALDONADO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-15064

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 29, 2009.

Orlando Maldonado, Miami, FL, pro se.

Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before CARNES, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

David J. Joffe, appointed counsel for Orlando Maldonado in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Maldonado’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
-  Home 
        -  Research & Funding 
        -  Current Funding Opportunities 
        -  Centers for AIDS Research (P30 Clinical Trial Not Allowed) 

View Current Funding Opportunities

# Centers for AIDS Research (P30 Clinical Trial Not Allowed)

The purpose of this Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) is to invite applications for the Centers for AIDS Research (CFAR) program to provide administrative and shared research support to enhance HIV/AIDS research. CFARs provide core facilities, expertise, resources, and services not readily obtained otherwise through more traditional funding mechanisms. The program emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration across all areas of HIV/AIDS research.  

### Funding Opportunity Details

Full Announcement:PAR-23-116Related Notices or Announcements:NOT-OD-22-189; NOT-OD-22-195; not-od-22-198; NOT-OD-23-012

Program Contact:Peter J. Perrin, Ph.D.

P30 - Center Core Grant

### Key Dates

Open Date:            7/2/2023        

Letter of Intent Due Date:            30 days prior to the application due date
****

**Employee Orientation Checklist**

For additional information, please refer to the New Employee Orientation Training in DOI Talent.

****

**FIRE AND AVIATION**

**EMPLOYEE SAFETY ORIENTATION CHECKLIST**

Employee Name:		

Supervisor:		

Instructions: This checklist is designed to guide supervisors in providing employee safety orientation to new employees and volunteers. Applicable safety training and orientation should be indicated by supervisor and employee initials and date. Additional specialized training may be required for some employees. Consult with local field safety manager or state safety manager to receive specific local requirements.

For additional information, please refer to the New Employee Orientation Training in DOI Talent.

Checklist #20 – Employee Orientation Checklist		Revised June 2021

# image1.png
#### Queens Unit Venture, LLC, Appellant, v Tyson Court Owners Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[975 NYS2d 57]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered August 21, 2012, which to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant Tyson Court Owners Corp.’s motion to renew, and upon renewal, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment to the extent it sought a declaration that the shares associated with Units Cl and C5 in the subject building constituted “unsold shares” pursuant to the cooperative’s proprietary lease, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion to renew denied.

The motion court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the motion to renew. A motion for leave to renew “shall be based upon new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination,” and “shall contain reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior motion” (CPLR 2221 [e] [2], [3]). “A motion to renew is not a second chance freely given to parties who have not exercised due diligence in making their first factual presentation” *(Sobin v Tylutki,*59 AD3d 701, 702 [2d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks omitted]). The purported new facts set forth in defendant’s motion were presented in affidavits which had been previously rejected as an impermissible sur*553reply on the original motion for summary judgment *(see Coleman v Korn,*92 AD3d 595 [1st Dept 2012]). The affidavits were executed approximately four weeks before the original summary judgment motion was submitted and defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable justification for failing to submit them in a timely fashion at that time *(see James v 1620 Westchester Ave., LLC,*105 AD3d 1, 7 [1st Dept 2013]; *Chelsea Piers Mgt. v Forest Elec. Corp.,*281 AD2d 252 [1st Dept 2001]). In any event, the affidavits were conclusory. Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Friedman, Freedman and Clark, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 32226(11).]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS PART OF
THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,176
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                       931
<INVENTORY>                                    105,242
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,293
<PP&E>                                         126,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 262,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,739
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           856
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   262,053
<SALES>                                        406,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               406,030
<CGS>                                          287,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,954)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,040
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,297
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,743
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,743
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
Motion Denied and Dissent to Order filed March 5, 2019.

In the

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-00601-CR

KENDRICK DWAYNE WALKER, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 208th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1540170

DISSENT TO DENIAL OF MOTION TO ABATE THE APPEAL AND 

REMAND THE CASE FOR A HEARING ON APPELLANT’S MOTION 

FOR NEW TRIAL

Because appellant’s motion for new trial raises issues which are not 

determinable from the record, I would grant appellant’s motion to abate the appeal 

and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on appellant’s motion for new 

trial so that appellant has meaningful appellate review. See Smith v. State, 286 

S.W.3d 333, 338 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Hemphill v. State, No. 14-13-00395-CR, 
2

2015 WL 1456338, at *5–*10 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Mar. 26, 2015, no 

pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

Accordingly, I dissent from the denial of appellant’s motion to abate the 

appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on appellant’s motion for 

new trial.

/s/ Charles A. Spain

Justice

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain (J. Spain, 

dissenting).

Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Interagency Fire Program Management  Qualifications Standards and Guide 

http://www.nifc.gov/training_quals/IFPM/ifpm.htm  

 Decision Paper  November 15, 2004  Temporary Hiring Under the IFPM Standard  Issue: With the implementation of the Interagency Fire Program Management Qualifications Standards and Guide (IFPM Standard) all temporary (seasonal) employees, as of October 1, 2004, must meet the minimum qualification standards of the IFPM Standard.  In addition, all temporary employees (new or returning) are to be placed in the newly established interagency standard position descriptions that contain an amendment regarding the IFPM Standard minimum qualifications.  There is growing concern from managers that they will not be able to fill their temporary positions if the minimum qualifications standards as outlined in the IFPM Standard are used.  There has not been sufficient time to ensure temporary senior firefighters have been given an opportunity to meet the NWCG Incident Management Qualifications.  Permanent employees, in these same positions, have five (5) years to meet the qualification requirements.  Resolution:   This decision delays the implementation of the IFPM Standard for temporary employees for one (1) year.  This delay would apply across all agencies for the period of October 1, 2004, to October 1, 2005.  Temporary employees hired under this delay provision would remain in their agencies’ existing standard position description for the 2005 fire season.    Scope:   This delay of IFPM implementation will apply to all temporary employees (new or returning) at the GS-05 and GS-06 levels.  Effective dates will be October 1, 2004, to October 1, 2005.    /s/ Lyle Carlile      /s/ Larry Hamilton Lyle Carlile, Fire Director   Larry Hamilton, OF&A Director USDI, Bureau of Indian Affairs  USDI, Bureau of Land Management   /s/ Deb Aiken  for     /s/ Sue Vap  for Phil Street, Fire Director   Edy Rhodes-Williams, Chief USDI, Fish and Wildlife Service  Division of Fire & Aviation Management       USDI, National Park Service    /s/ Alice R Forbes Alice Forbes, Assistant Director Fire & Aviation Management Operations 

 USDA, Forest Service
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 

Office of Fire and Aviation 

Operations Alert 

No. 05-04 August 5, 2005 

Subject: SEAT Operations 

Area of Concern: Operational Procedures 

Discussion: In light of some recent events, it is important to remind each SEAT Manager to remain focused on 

all aspects of safety. All SEMGs should be conducting the “six minutes for safety” discussions each day. 

We will provide the time and opportunity for pilots to review their emergency procedures prior to the start of 

operations each day. This time shall include, but not be limited to, quiet study time for the pilot to reexamine the 

standard procedures for in-flight emergencies, as well as some time in the cockpit to physically rehearse those 

procedures. We must also provide the opportunity for the pilot to exercise the emergency jettison mechanism on 

the aircraft. We will provide the water and any necessary support to accomplish the task. Doing the water jettison 

practice can be accomplished on the ramp. This should become standard operations at the base on a periodic basis. 

Discuss appropriate frequency with your pilots, but at least once a week should be the norm. 

Discuss with the pilots all emergency radio procedures. Have them practice switching to “Guard” and making the 

calls appropriate for emergencies. It would be a good idea to discuss with the pilot what help we would be able to 

provide, such as alerting the appropriate authorities and initiating the “Emergency Plan” for the situation. This will 

relieve some of the workload on the pilot at a time when he/she will be otherwise pre-occupied. 

Another reminder is to review the “Crash Rescue” plan for your base. Discuss all items and procedures with the 

base personnel and pilots. Practice drills and specific task assignments should also be part of your daily work 

schedule. Review the operation of the fire extinguishers and when to use them. Discuss with the pilot how to 

operate the emergency door release on the aircraft, and review that operation on a daily basis. 

Please take the time, during your busy schedule, to remind yourselves that even the smallest lapse in focus could 

result in an incident that could have dire consequences. 

The lesson here is to “be prepared” for the worst case scenario. Know and practice your emergency procedures. 

Stay focused on safety. 

For additional information contact 

Joe Bates, DOI, BLM (208) 387-5879 Cell (208) 830-1634 

Sean Cross, DOI, BLM (208) 387-5444 Cell (208) 867-0285