alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2847 

To regulate the volume of audio on commercials. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2009 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To regulate the volume of audio on commercials. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commercial Advertise5 ment Loudness Mitigation Act’’ or the ‘‘CALM Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RULEMAKING ON LOUD COMMERCIALS REQUIRED. 

7 (a) RULEMAKING REQUIRED.—Within 1 year after 

8 the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Commu9 nications Commission shall prescribe pursuant to the 

10 Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) a 

11 regulation that is limited to incorporating by reference the 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 2847 IS

1 ‘‘Recommended Practice: Techniques for Establishing and 

2 Maintaining Audio Loudness for Digital Television’’ (A/ 

3 85), and any successor thereto, approved by the Advanced 

4 Television Systems Committee, only insofar as such rec5 ommended practice concerns the transmission of commer6 cial advertisements by a television broadcast station, cable 

7 operator, or other multichannel video programming dis8 tributor. 

9 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.— 

10 (1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Federal Commu11 nications Commission shall prescribe that the regula12 tion adopted pursuant to subsection (a) shall become 

13 effective 1 year after the date of its adoption. 

14 (2) WAIVER.—For any television broadcast sta15 tion, cable operator, or other multichannel video pro16 gramming distributor that demonstrates that obtain17 ing the equipment to comply with the regulation 

18 adopted pursuant to subsection (a) would result in 

19 financial hardship, the Federal Communications 

20 Commission may grant a waiver of the effective date 

21 set forth in paragraph (1) for 1 year and may renew 

22 such waiver for 1 additional year. 

23 (c) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 2847 IS

1 (1) the term ‘‘television broadcast station’’ has 

2 the meaning given such term in section 325 of the 

3 Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 325); and 

4 (2) the terms ‘‘cable operator’’ and ‘‘multi5 channel video programming distributor’’ have the 

6 meanings given such terms in section 602 of Com7 munications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 522). 

Æ 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with BILLS
# Accountability 

Incident Management Teams (IMTs) are required to maintain accountability of all equipment and supply items ordered to keep incident related loss to a minimum. Refer to Chapter 30 of the Interagency Incident Business Management Handbook for guidance and procedures. The Great Basin Cache provides each Incident Summary and Loss Use Report which has detailed information regarding consumable and durable item use for inventory purposes.  As items are returned and refurbished the associated credits will be reflected in the report. Any durable items or trackable equipment not returned to GBK are reflected as incident loss. The cache will forward this report to the Incident Agency Administrator.

## Supplies

-  Great Basin Cache    -  Accountability 
  -  Cache Demobilization 
  -  Cache Vans 
  -  Contacts 
  -  Emergency Hiring 
  -  Forms 
  -  Ordering 
  -  Returns
National Interagency Coordination Center
Toggle Font Size
      Toggle OpenDyslexic
      Toggle Dyslexia-friendly black-on-creme color scheme
      Contact Us
KeywordsHomeIncident InformationIncident Management Situation Report (IMSR)IMSR MapGeographic AreasPredictive ServicesIntelligenceWeatherFuels/Fire DangerOutlooksLogisticsAviationOverheadCrewsEquipment & SuppliesReference DocumentsAirspaceNMACAll Hazard ResponseContactAviationOverheadCrewsEquipment & SuppliesReference Documents Home
                        National Interagency Coordination Center
                        Logistics
  Equipment & Supplies
Equipment

  VIPR Dispatch Priority Lists

AIMS Dispatch Priority Lists

NERV Rental Vehicles
Supplies

  National Incident Support Caches

National Fire Equipment System (NFES) Catalog
 **National Interagency Coordination Center**
National Interagency Fire Center
3833 S. Development Ave.
Boise, Idaho, 83705
NIFC Homepage
              
              
              Social
  

        
              Facebook
                Twitter
                Flickr
                YouTube
                LinkedIn
              About
  

        
              About NIFC
                FAQ
                Map and Directions
                Phone Directory nifc.gov
An official website of the Department of the Interior
      
      About DOI.gov
	Accessibility statement
	FOIA requests
      No FEAR Act data
	Office of the Inspector General
	Budget & performance reports
      Agency financial reports
	Disclaimer
	Privacy policy
      Vulnerability disclosure policy
	Cummings Act notices
      Looking for U.S. government information and services? Visit USA.gov

The National Interagency Fire Center is committed to making its information and communication technologies accessible to individuals with disabilities by meeting or exceeding the requirements of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. To meet this commitment, we continue to monitor and update our content to make sure our documents meet these standards.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) of PlainsCapital Corporation (the Company), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |        |  |                                                     
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2011 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ ALAN B. WHITE                                   
|                  |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Alan B. White                                       
|                  |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer                             
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: May 5, 2011 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ JOHN A. MARTIN                                  
|                  |  |  |  | Name:  |  | John A. Martin                                      
|                  |  |  |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is furnished as an exhibit to the Report and will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Alliance Health, Inc.
File No. 33-17387

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Health, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2007 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Sarkis
J.  Kechejian,  Chief  Executive  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: February 11, 2008                      /s/ Sarkis J. Kechejian, M. D.
       -----------------                      ----------------------------------
                                                      Sarkis J. Kechejian, M. D.
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alliance Health,  Inc. and will be retained by Alliance Health, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Uroplasty, Inc. and Subsidiaries
as of and for the year ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,553,093
<SECURITIES>                                   750,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  954,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    735,630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,393,531
<PP&E>                                       1,625,825
<DEPRECIATION>                               (528,707)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,599,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          825,717
<BONDS>                                        528,808
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,753
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,185,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,599,541
<SALES>                                      5,560,019
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,560,019
<CGS>                                        1,604,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,604,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,301,815
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,373,940)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (25,106)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,348,834)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,348,834)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Timothy Wayne ALBERT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-30708

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 22, 2006.

William P. Gibbens, Nils Robert Kessler, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Roma A. Kent, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Robin Elise Schulberg, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Albert appeals the revocation of his supervised release and the thirty-six month sentence subsequently imposed. We review for abuse of discretion and affirm for the following reason.

“[T] his court will uphold a sentence unless it is in violation of the law or plainly unreasonable.” *United States v. Gonzalez,*250 F.3d 923, 925 (5th Cir.2001) (internal citations omitted). To revoke a term of supervised release, a district court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant violated a condition of his release. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). As a Class B felon, Albert was susceptible to three years imprisonment for violating the conditions of his supervised release. *Id.*The preponderance standard was easily satisfied because Albert stipulated to the Grade C supervised release violations. In light of Albert’s lengthy criminal history, this sentence is not plainly unreasonable.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32-1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Financial Report of NoFire Technologies Inc.,
on Form 10Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Sam Gottfried, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o (d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated April 16,2010
Name /s/ Sam Gottfried (CEO)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that  appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written  statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to NoFire Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by NoFire
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.







Exhibit 32-2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Financial Report of NoFire Technologies Inc.,
on Form 10Q for the quarter ended February 28 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Sam Oolie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o (d)); and


(2) The information contained in the Form 10Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: April 16,2010

Name /s/ Sam Oolie (CFO)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that  appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written  statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to NoFire Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by NoFire
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Marc S. Kirschner, as Trustee of the Refco Litigation Trust, Appellant, v KPMG LLP et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Submitted August 2, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

Motion by Professor M. Todd Henderson for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on consideration of the certified questions herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Three copies of the brief must be served and an original and 24 copies filed within seven days.
EXHIBIT 10.4


 


[ORLEANS
HOMEBUILDERS, INC. LETTERHEAD]


 


Garry P. Herdler

c/o 3333 Street Road, Suite 101


Bensalem, PA 19020


 


Re:          Orleans Homebuilders, Inc.
Restricted Stock


 


Dear Garry:


 


As you know,
Orleans Homebuilders, Inc. (the “Company”) granted to you 240,000 shares
of restricted stock pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award dated December 6,
2007 (the “Restricted Stock”). The Restricted Stock is being issued pursuant to
Registration Statement No. 333-119004 on Form S-8 which registered
400,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock issuable under the Plan.  At
the time the grant was made, the Company’s Compensation Committee also
determined that the Company should pay to you a tax gross-up with respect to
income taxes payable by you as a result of the vesting of the Restricted Stock.


 


The purpose of
this letter is to confirm to you that, from time to time as of the date any
amounts are required to be taken into account as income to you for income tax
purposes by reason of the vesting of the Restricted Stock, the Company will pay
to you an additional cash payment (a “Gross-Up Payment”) sufficient to pay
all of your federal, state and local income taxes on such income taken into
account by reason of the vesting of the Restricted Stock from time to time and
on the Gross-Up Payment itself. For purposes of calculating the amounts payable
by the Company hereunder, with respect to income taxes to which you are
subject, you shall be deemed to pay income taxes at the highest applicable
marginal rate of federal, state or local income taxation for the calendar year
in which the payments are made regardless of the amount of taxes actually paid.
To implement the foregoing, with respect to the vesting of each tranche of
Restricted Stock, the Company shall pay to the appropriate federal, state
and/or local taxing authorities, on your behalf, all amounts required under
applicable laws and/or regulations to be withheld and paid over by the Company
with respect to federal, state and/or local tax liabilities no later than the
earlier of (i) the last business day of the calendar year in which the
applicable tranche vested and (ii) 30 days after the applicable tranche
has vested. The amounts so paid shall in general be considered to be a payment
of all or a portion of your Gross-Up Payments. Within 60 days after the vesting
of the applicable tranche giving rise to the Company’s obligation to make the
Gross-Up Payment, the Company shall pay to you any portion of a Gross-Up
Payment to which you may be entitled that was not paid as tax withholding.


 


If you should
have any questions about this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me.


 


	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  BENJAMIN D. GOLDMAN

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Benjamin D. Goldman

  
	
   

  
	
  Agreed to and
  acknowledged:

  
	
   

  
	
  GARRY P. HERDLER

  	
   

  
	
  Garry P. Herdler
#### Elizabeth Miller Nabors, Respondent, v Town of Somers, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Submitted November 8, 2010;

decided December 21, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and is not an order of the type provided for in CPLR 5602 (a) (2).
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2535 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on esters and sodium esters 

of parahydroxybenzoic acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on esters and 

sodium esters of parahydroxybenzoic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESTERS AND SODIUM ESTERS OF 

4 PARAHYDROXYBENZOIC ACID. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.75 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 esters and sodium esters of parahydroxybenzoic acid) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2011’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2535 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# Pg. 1

# Pg. 2

# Pg. 3

# Pg. 4

# Pg. 5

# Pg. 6

# Pg. 7

# Pg. 8

# Pg. 9

# Pg. 10

# Pg. 11

# Pg. 12

# Pg. 13

# Pg. 14

# Pg. 15

# Pg. 16
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2663 

To suspend temporarily the duty on DCDNBTF Benzene, 2,4-dichloro-1,3- 

dinitro-5-(trifluoroethyl)-. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on DCDNBTF Benzene, 

2,4-dichloro-1,3-dinitro-5-(trifluoroethyl)-. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DCDNBTF BENZENE, 2,4-DICHLORO-1,3- 

4 DINITRO-5-(TRIFLUOROETHYL)-. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 DCDNBTF Benzene, 2,4- 

dichloro-1,3-dinitro-5- 

(trifluoroethyl)- (CAS No. 

393–75–9) (provided for in 

subheading 2904.90.47) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2663 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### Sanders v. State Personnel Comm’n

Case below: 183 N.C. App.-(1 May 2007)

No. 262P07

1. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-149)

2. Pit’s Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Denied 10/11/07

2. Dismissed as Moot 10/11/07