alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  audited  financial  statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000892160
<NAME>                        Derma Sciences, Inc.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,173,893
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      487,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        774,672
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,670,506
<PP&E>                                             144,591
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,371,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,219,267
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         17,500
<COMMON>                                            45,676
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,089,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,371,840
<SALES>                                          4,010,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,010,148
<CGS>                                              793,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      793,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  65,585
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,416,244)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,416,244)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,416,244)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.58)



</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2638 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine, 

N,N′′′-[1,2-ethanediylbis-[[[4,6-bis[butyl (1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4- 

piperidinyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazine-2-yl]imino]-3,1-propanediyl]]bis[N′,N′′- 

dibutyl-N′,N′′-bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl)-and Butanedioic 

acid, dimethylester polymer with 4-hyroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperdine 

ethanol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SESSIONS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine, N,N′′′-[1,2-ethanediylbis-[[[4,6- 

bis[butyl (1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl)amino]- 

1,3,5-triazine-2-yl]imino]-3,1-propanediyl]]bis[N′,N′′- 

dibutyl-N′,N′′-bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl)- 

and Butanedioic acid, dimethylester polymer with 4- 

hyroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperdine ethanol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2638 IS

1 SECTION 1. 1,3,5-TRIAZINE-2,4,6-TRIAMINE, N,N′′′-[1,2- 

2 ETHANEDIYLBIS-[[[4,6-BIS[BUTYL (1,2,2,6,6- 

3 PENTAMETHYL-4-PIPERIDINYL)AMINO]-1,3,5- 

4 TRIAZINE-2-YL]IMINO]-3,1- 

5 PROPANEDIYL]]BIS[N′,N′′-DIBUTYL-N′,N′′- 

6 BIS(1,2,2,6,6-PENTAMETHYL-4-PIPERIDINYL)- 

7 AND BUTANEDIOIC ACID, DIMETHYLESTER 

8 POLYMER WITH 4-HYROXY-2,2,6,6- 

9 TETRAMETHYL-1-PIPERDINE ETHANOL. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.48 of the Har11 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

12 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-triamine, N,N′′′-[1,2-ethanediylbis13 [[[4,6-bis[butyl (1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4- 

14 piperidinyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazine-2-yl]imino]-3,1- 

15 propanediyl]]bis[N′,N′′-dibutyl-N′,N′′-bis(1,2,2,6,6- 

16 pentamethyl-4-piperidinyl)-and Butanedioic acid, 

17 dimethylester polymer with 4-hyroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl18 1-piperdine ethanol) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ 

19 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

22 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

23 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Mercedes Casado et al., Respondents, v Marvin Markus, as Chair of the New York City Rent Guidelines Board, et al., Appellants.

Submitted January 10, 2011;

decided January 18, 2011

Motion by Council of the City of New York for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 205 (Monday, October 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 55064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25674]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area Advisory Council; 
Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Boston 
Harbor Islands National Recreation Area.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Boston Harbor 
Islands National Recreation Area Advisory Council will be held on 
Wednesday, December 2, 2009, at 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. at the Partnership 
Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 217, Boston, MA.
    This will be the quarterly meeting of the Council. The agenda will 
include an update on the messaging project, discussion of how to 
stimulate public participation in park planning and other management 
efforts, planning for the annual meeting in March, a park update, and 
public comment.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Any person may file with 
the Superintendent a written statement concerning the matters to be 
discussed. Persons who wish to file a written statement at the meeting 
or who want further information concerning the meeting may contact 
Superintendent Bruce Jacobson at (617) 223-8667.

DATES: December 2, 2009 at 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Partnership Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 217, Boston, 
MA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent Bruce Jacobson, (617) 
223-8667.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Advisory Council was appointed by the 
Director of National Park Service pursuant to Public Law 104-333. The 
28 members represent business, educational/cultural, community and 
environmental entities; municipalities surrounding Boston Harbor; 
Boston Harbor advocates; and Native American interests. The purpose of 
the Council is to advise and make recommendations to the Boston Harbor 
Islands Partnership with respect to the development and implementation 
of a management plan and the operations of the Boston Harbor Islands 
NRA.

    Dated: October 7, 2009.
Bruce Jacobson,
Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA.
[FR Doc. E9-25674 Filed 10-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-86-P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130909 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130909 COA: 267842 Ingham CC: 03-001228-FC JARON DUSHAUN BATTLE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal to review the process by which the Department of Corrections calculated jail credit.

d0220 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2007

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       14,605
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,554
<ALLOWANCES>                                    762
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
<PP&E>                                       17,362
<DEPRECIATION>                               14,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               20,941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   17,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 20,941
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              5,729
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            (2,223)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               3,641
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           3,641
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  3,641
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  6.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        

</TABLE>
Document

Exhibit 10.7

SECOND AMENDMENT
TO
TAX ALLOCATION AGREEMENT


Whereas Leonardo US Holding, Inc. (“Parent”), Leonardo DRS, Inc. (“DRS”), and Leonardo US Aircraft, Inc. (collectively the “Parties”) entered into a Tax Allocation Agreement dated November 16, 2020 (the “Agreement”);
Whereas the Agreement was amended by the Parties on July 28th, 2022; and
Whereas the Agreement sets forth certain tax practices, obligations, and rights of the Parties and their affiliates.
Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
Clarification of the Agreement
1.For the avoidance of doubt, the Parties agree that any reference to “net operating losses” in the Agreement (as well as this amendment) similarly includes any net capital losses.  
Amendment to Section 3 of the Agreement
2.If (i) Parent takes (or permits to be taken) any action that results in a Member of the Affiliated Group ceasing to be a member of such Affiliated Group (a “Former Member”) and (ii) a tax liability is imposed on the Former Member as a result of its deconsolidation from Parent, then the Former Member shall be entitled to utilize any available net operating losses of the Affiliated Group to offset such tax liability and, notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, the Former Member shall have no obligation to compensate or otherwise provide any consideration to any Member of the Affiliated Group for the use of such net operating losses; provided that the Former Member shall be so entitled only to the extent that such net operating losses would otherwise expire unused by the Affiliated Group in the absence of the Former Member’s utilization of them.  Neither Parent nor any other Member of the Affiliated Group shall have any liability to the Former Member, and the Former Member shall have no recourse against Parent or any other Member of the Affiliated Group, in respect of any challenge or disallowance by a tax authority of the Former’s Member’s utilization of such net operating losses.  This paragraph shall not apply to any increase in tax liability of the Former Member resulting from a tax authority’s recalculation of the Former Member’s tax basis in, or the fair market value of, any equity interest disposed of by the Former Member to a third party. 
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused their names to be subscribed and executed by their respective authorized officers on the dates indicated below, to effectuate this Second Amendment as of the date of Closing of the transaction as described above.
						
	LEONARDO US HOLDING, INC.
		
		
	By:	/s/ Christopher T. Slack
	Name:	Christopher T. Slack
	Title:	President
	Date:	July 29th, 2022

		
		
	LEONARDO DRS, INC.
		
		
	By:	/s/ Jason Rinsky
	Name:	Jason Rinsky
	Title:	SVP, Chief Tax and Treasury Officer
	Date:	July 29th, 2022

		
		
	LEONARDO US AIRCRAFT, INC.
		
		
	By:	/s/ Giorgio Moreni
	Name:	Giorgio Moreni
	Title:	Sole Director
	Date:	July 29th, 2022
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(b)

and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code



I, J. Reid Porter, the Chief Financial Officer of IMC Global Inc., certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended June
30, 2004 of IMC Global Inc. as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMC Global Inc.



September 14, 2004



|                  
|------------------
|                  
|/s/ J. Reid Porter
|J. Reid Porter
**Firefighter (2024)**

**Checklist #14**

**For the National Preparedness Review, you will need to have the following items available for review:**

**TRAINING AND READINESS**

***Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed***

**JOB ORIENTATION TRAINING**

***Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed***

**LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT**

***Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed***

**PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE)**

***Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed***

Firefighter	3	Revised April 2024

# image1.png
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41147 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EULOGIO MARTINEZ-RUIZ, also known as Nabor Martinez-Ruiz, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-98-CR-100-1

- - - - - - - - - - December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Eulogio Martinez-Ruiz (Martinez) appeals his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Martinez argues that the district court erred when it imposed a 16-level increase under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). Martinez contends that the crime of transporting illegal aliens does not qualify as an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(N). This court has held that the crime of transporting aliensNo. 98-41147 -2- qualifies as an aggravated felony under the Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Monjaras-Castaneda , 190 F.3d 326, 331 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
**DispatchChecklist #10**

**DispatchChecklist #10**

For the National Preparedness Review you will need to have the following items available for review.

**10-1Revised 2010**

**10-7Revised 2010**
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ana GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-16530

Non-Argument Calendar.

D.C. Docket No. 05-20333-CR-KMM.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 5, 2006.

Before ANDERSON, DUBINA and HULL, Circuit Judges.

*951PER CURIAM:

Ana Garcia appeals her 18-month sentence imposed following her plea of guilty to eight counts of bank fraud. Garcia assumes on appeal that she is entitled to appeal the district court’s denial of her motion for a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0(d)(5). She contends that the denial, which was based upon the merits, and, alternatively, procedural grounds, was in error. Garcia also claims that the district court believed that it lacked authority to depart.

Where a sentencing court refuses to depart downward based on the exercise of its discretionary authority, we lack jurisdiction to review that decision. *United States v. Chase,*174 F.3d 1193, 1195 (11th Cir. 1999). “[WJhen nothing in the record indicates otherwise, [we] assume the sentencing court understood it had authority to depart downward.” *Chase,*174 F.3d at 1195; see *United States v. Winingear,*422 F.3d 1241, 1245 (11th Cir.2005) (“After *Booker,*
      *1*
      **our review of decisions regarding downward departures remains limited”). In fact, a district court’s refusal to depart downward can present a cognizable claim on appeal only if the court erroneously believed that it lacked the authority to grant such a departure. *Chase,*174 F.3d at 1195; *United States v. Hadaway,*998 F.2d 917, 919 (11th Cir.1993).

A review of the sentencing hearing reveals that the district court understood that it had the authority to grant the departure and that it ruled on the motion both procedurally and on the merits. The district court made no statements that did not have the authority to grant the departure so we assume that it thought it did have the authority. *See Chase,*174 F.3d at 1195. Garcia’s claims to the contrary are without support in the record. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to review the merits of the district court’s denial of Garcia’s motion for downward departure.

Because the motion was considered on the merits by the district court, we further decline to reach her argument that it erred by finding that the motion was untimely filed.2
      *See Chase,*174 F.3d at 1195; *Hadaway,*998 F.2d at 919. Specifically, although the court alternatively discussed another basis for denying the motion (e.g., timeliness), the court’s ruling on the merits rendered the former omission moot.

Based upon the foregoing, we affirm Garcia’s sentence.

AFFIRMED.

. *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 756, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

. We have previously considered the Southern District of Florida’s Local Rule 88.8(6), which requires that motions for departure be filed no later than 5 days prior to the sentencing proceeding, and determined that the rule is permissible. *United States v. Quintana,*300 F.3d 1227, 1230 (11th Cir.2002).
#### Robert W. VALENTINE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 2006-3350.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 25, 2006.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted), Emile
Loria, M.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Epimmune Inc. (the "Company"), and
Robert De Vaere, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.      The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the
"Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.      The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated: October 21, 2002


  /s/ Emile Loria                         /s/ Robert De Vaere
---------------------------             -----------------------
Emile Loria, M.D.                       Robert De Vaere
Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DENALDO FORBES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1599

[February 28, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Elizabeth Anne 

Scherer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12-005062 CF10A.

Denaldo Forbes, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.