alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A1 57 0 . VI R I LI O NI EVES v . THE STATE.

Th i s ap p eal was d o ck et ed i n t h i s Co u rt o n Ap ri l 7

, 2 0 1 5

. Th e ap p el l an t ’ s b ri ef,

i n cl u d i n g en u m erat i o n o f erro rs , was d u e t o be f i l ed n o l at er t h an Ap ri l 28

, 2 0 1 5.

Co u rt o f Ap peal s Ru l es 22 (a) an d 2 3 (a). To d at e, ap p el l an t has n o t fi l ed a b ri ef an d

en u m e r a t i o n o f erro rs , an d n o ex t en s io n o f t i m e fo r fi l i n g h as b een g ran t ed o r

r eq u es t ed

. Acco rd i n gl y , Cas e Nu m b er A 1 5 A1 5 7 0 i s h ereb y D ISM ISSED f o r

ap p el l an t ’ s fai lu re t o fi l e a b ri ef an d en um erat i o n o f erro rs i n s up p o rt o f h i s ap p eal

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 06/01/2015 June 01, 2015
#### In the Matter of Rose Glatzer, Appellant, v Jay Glatzer et al., Respondents.

Submitted October 25, 2010;

decided December 21, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine *949the consolidated proceeding and action within the meaning of the Constitution.
##### 



EXHIBIT
10.3
 BENTLEY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 EQUITY AND INCENTIVE PLAN
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT CERTIFICATE
(Non-Employee Directors)
 RSU Number:
    
    Units
  Award Date:Name of Participant:Address:Social Security No.:Number of Restricted Stock Units:Vesting Schedule:Settlement Schedule:
    
    Vested Restricted Stock Units shall be settled as set forth in Section 3 on
the reverse side of this Certificate.
  BENTLEY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:Title:




---



##### 



TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
 The Plan
 No Rights as Stockholder or Director
 Settlement of Restricted Stock Units: Issuance of Common Stock
 Vesting
 Change in Control
 End of Service as Director
 Restriction on Transfer
 409A
 Conditions for Issuance of Shares provided however
 Notices
 Miscellaneous
 Governing Law
 Severability
 (Amended as of 5/23/2007)
 2
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2702 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phosphinic acid, diethyl- 

, aluminum salt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phosphinic 

acid, diethyl-, aluminum salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHINIC ACID, DIETHYL-, ALUMINUM SALT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.42 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Phosphinic acid, diethyl-, aluminum salt) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2702 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Justyce M. and Another, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Monroe County Department of Human Services, Respondent; Shavon E., Appellant.

Submitted November 22, 2010;

decided January 6, 2011

*727Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
No. 851.

#### Indianapolis Power & Light Co. *v.*National Labor Relations Board.

February 9, 1942.

*Messrs. Arthur L. Gilliom*and *Elbert R. Gilliom*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Fahy*and *Messrs. Robert L. Stern, Robert B.*
      *805
      *Watts, Ernest A. Gross,*and *Morris P. Glushien*for respondent.

*804Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

F1 -- This amount  represents  Basic  Earnings per Share in accordance  with the
requirements of Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards No. 128 - "Earnings
per Share."

F2 -- This amount  represents  Diluted Earnings per Share in accordance with the
requirements of Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards No. 128 - "Earnings
per Share."

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000822418
<NAME>                        Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  OCT-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                           2,158,550
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,233,663
<ALLOWANCES>                                        20,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,484,785
<PP&E>                                           4,007,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,474,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,076,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              811,115
<BONDS>                                              5,559
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            104
<COMMON>                                             1,944
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,257,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,076,076
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,118,096
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      504,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   968,349
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (26,698)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (328,058)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (328,058)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (328,058)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.04) <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04) <F2>



        


</TABLE>
Forest Service Photography and Video

Cecilio (Rick) Ricardo

202-777-7561

Cecilio.Ricardo@usda.gov

Tanya Flores

Tanya.flores@usda.gov

Forest Service Photography Standards

Filename: 20190515-FS-LosPadres-JMS-001

Captions

What, where, and when?

Firefighters dig a trench in Los Padres National Forest, California.

Byline

(Forest Service photo by John Smith)

Firefighters dig a trench in Los Padres National Forest, 

California. (Forest Service photo by John Smith) 

Forest Service Flickr Photography Archive

Forest Service Flickr

Externally accessible

Contains multiple sized images w/captions

Regional Flickr Sites

Region 1 Northern Region Flickr

Region 2 Rocky Mountain Flickr

Region 3 Southwestern Flickr

Region 4 Intermountain Flickr

Region 5 California Flickr

Region 6 Pacific Northwest Flickr

Pacific Northwest Research Station Flickr

Region 9 Eastern Flickr

Region 10 Alaska

Forest Service Instagram

112K Followers and growing

Average of 2,500 likes per image

Share our Instagram 

Send us images to share and help us 

connect you to our national audience

Forest Service Video Standards

USDA/FS logos with EEO Statement Slate

Approval form with leadership signatures

Partnership agreement

Closed captions. An .srt or .txt file works

Send into our Pinyon folder

Note: If you share a video clip on social media with PA approval,

 without editing, it does not need Video slate, approval form, or closed captions

Forest Service VideoYoutube

Official Forest Service Videos

Public Service Announcements

Forest Service VideoVimeo – video Archive

Forest Service video clips

Fire

Recreation

Training video clips

Internal messaging

Story Map links to videos

Forest Service Office of Communication Hub

OC Hub

Multimedia Standards

Multimedia Forms

Multimedia Training

Multimedia Links 

# image6.png

# image7.png

# image8.JPG

# image9.JPG

# image10.jpeg

# image11.JPG

# image12.JPG

# image13.JPG

# image14.JPG

# image2.png

# image3.png

# image4.png

# image5.png
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2796 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2796

   To extend the authority of the Secretary of Education to purchase 
    guaranteed student loans for an additional year, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2009

Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Burr, 
    Mr. Coburn, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Isakson, Mr. McCain, Ms. 
 Murkowski, and Mr. Roberts) introduced the following bill; which was 
 read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 
                              and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the authority of the Secretary of Education to purchase 
    guaranteed student loans for an additional year, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF STUDENT LOAN PURCHASE AUTHORITY.

    Section 459A of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087i-
1) is amended--
            (1) in subsections (a)(1), (a)(3)(A), and (f), by striking 
        ``July 1, 2010'' and inserting ``July 1, 2011''; and
            (2) in subsection (e)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding clause (i) of paragraph 
                (1)(A) and the matter preceding subparagraph (A) of 
                paragraph (2), by striking ``September 30, 2010'' and 
                inserting ``September 30, 2011'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``February 15, 
                2011'' and inserting ``February 15, 2012''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (3), by striking ``2010, and 
                2011'' and inserting ``2010, 2011, and 2012''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE LENDERS FOR LENDER-OF-LAST-
              RESORT PROGRAM.

    Section 428(j) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1078(j)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ``June 30, 2010'' and 
        inserting ``June 30, 2011'';
            (2) in paragraph (7), by striking ``June 30, 2010'' and 
        inserting ``June 30, 2011''; and
            (3) in paragraph (9)(A)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subclause (I) of clause 
                (ii), by striking ``June 30, 2011'' and inserting 
                ``June 30, 2012'';
                    (B) in subclause (III) of clause (ii), by striking 
                ``June 30, 2010'' and inserting ``June 30, 2011''; and
                    (C) in the matter preceding subclause (I) of clause 
                (iii), by striking ``July 1, 2011'' and inserting 
                ``July 1, 2012''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Fernando BRAVO-CAMARGO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-2090.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 28, 2006.

David C. Iglesias, U.S. Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Albuquerque, NM, Terri J. Abernathy, Office of the United States Attorney, Las Cruces, NM, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Stephen P. McCue, Fed. Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Albuquerque, NM, Dennis J. Candelaria, Federal Public Defender Office, Las Cruces, NM, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HENRY, O’BRIEN, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.

*832ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

The government has filed a motion to enforce the plea agreement with defendant Oscar Fernando Bravo-Camargo. In the agreement, Mr. Bravo-Camargo waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence on the charge of possessing with intent to distribute 500 grams and more of cocaine. Defendant’s attorney does not oppose the motion to enforce. This court notified Mr. Bravo-Camargo that he could file a written opposition to the motion to enforce, but he did not do so.

This court will enforce a criminal defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal so long as the following three elements are satisfied: (1) “the disputed appeal falls within the scope of the waiver of appellate rights,” (2) the defendant’s waiver of his appellate rights was knowing and voluntary, and (3) enforcing the waiver will not result in a miscarriage of justice. *United States v. Hahn,*359 F.3d 1315, 1325 (10th Cir.2004) (en banc) (per curiam). We have carefully reviewed the transcript of the hearing at which Mr. Bravo-Camargo entered his guilty plea. The presiding magistrate judge thoroughly reviewed the terms of the waiver with Mr. Bravo-Camargo. We conclude that the *Hahn*factors have been satisfied.

Accordingly, we GRANT the government’s motion to enforce the plea agreement and DISMISS the appeal. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

 This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis FLORES-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-50125.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2009.*

Filed May 26, 2009.

Sheri Pym, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Riverside, CA, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Davina T. Chen, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Jill K. Ginstling, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, Jose Luis Flores-Lopez, U.S. Penitentiary, Lompoc, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

*618Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Luis Flores-Lopez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for being an illegal felon found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Flores-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

In accordance with *United States v. Rivera-Sanchez,*222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). *See United States v. Herrera-Blanco,*232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).

Appellant’s request that this Court order the government to provide a proof of claim is denied.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct judgment.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Johnny PANTOUW; Elias Taufan Pantouw, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-70614.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2009.*

Filed May 22, 2009.

Sharon A. Healey, Law Office of Sharon A. Healey, Seattle, WA, for Petitioners.

*615Carol Federighi, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, Eric Warren Marsteller, Esquire, Trial, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, WWS-District Counsel, Esquire, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Johnny Pantouw and his son, natives and citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence. *Wakkary v. Holder,*558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009). We deny in part, dismiss in part, and grant in part the petition for review.

The agency denied Pantouw’s asylum claim as time-barred. Pantouw does not challenge this finding in his opening brief.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Pantouw failed to show it was more likely than not that he would be tortured in Indonesia. *See id.*at 1068. Therefore, we deny Pan-touw’s CAT claim.

We lack jurisdiction to address Pan-touw’s contention that he established a pattern or practice of persecution against Christian Indonesians because he failed to exhaust this claim before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004). Thus, we dismiss Pantouw’s pattern or practice contention.

However, because the BIA erred by refusing to consider the evidence regarding whether Pantouw belonged to a disfavored group in assessing withholding of removal, we grant the petition for review in part and remand to the BIA for reconsideration of this claim. *See Wakkary,*558 F.3d at 1066-67.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part; GRANTED in part; REMANDED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*616ed by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 3037-013]

On April 10, 2009, BTSFEO, LLC (Transferor) and TAI-O Associates, LP (Transferee) filed a joint application for transfer of license of the Elizabeth Webbing Hydroelectric Project No. 3037. The project is located on the Blackstone River in Providence County, Rhode Island.

Applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the license for the Elizabeth Webbing Hydroelectric Project from BTSFEO, LLC to TAI-O Associates, LP.

*Applicant Contact:*                     For Transferor, Mr. Gene Carlino, Esq., BTSFEO, LLC, c/o Carlino Law Associates, 410 South Main Street, Providence, RI 02903, telephone (401) 831-9000, FAX (401) 831-9090.                

For Transferee, Mr. Louis Yip, TAI-O Associates, LP, 521 Roosevelt Avenue, Central Falls, RI 02863, telephone (401) 965-3666, FAX (212) 504-3097.

*FERC Contact:*                     Diane M. Murray, (202) 502-8838.                

                    Deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to intervene: 30 days from the issuance of this notice. Comments and motions to intervene may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the “e-Filing” link. If unable to be filed electronically, documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to the Commission's Web site located at                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​filing-comments.asp*. More information about this project can be viewed or printed on the “eLibrary” link of Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​elibrary.asp*. Enter the docket number (P-3037-013) in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-25256 Filed 10-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-23-00107-CR

Joe RANGEL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CR7315

Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s sentencing judgment 

is modified to strike the fine assessed against Appellant Rangel. The trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

SIGNED April 24, 2024.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice