alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2716 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2716

       To suspend temporarily the duty on preparations based on 
                           polyethylenimine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on preparations based on 
                           polyethylenimine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREPARATIONS BASED ON POLYETHYLENIMINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Preparations based  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          on                                                                 31/2011.......
                          polyethylenimine
                          (CAS No. 25987-06-
                          8) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          3911.90.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2846 

To authorize the issuance of United States War Bonds to aid in funding 

of the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2009 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the issuance of United States War Bonds to 

aid in funding of the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States War 

5 Bonds Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 

7 The purpose of this Act is to authorize the issuance 

8 of United States War Bonds to aid in the funding of the 

9 operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 2846 IS

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF UNITED 

2 STATES WAR BONDS. 

3 Section 3102 of title 31, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(f) ISSUANCE OF UNITED STATES WAR BONDS.— 

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized 

7 to issue bonds under this section, to be known as 

8 ‘United States War Bonds’, to aid in the funding of 

9 the operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

10 ‘‘(2) FORM.—The bonds authorized by para11 graph (1) shall be in such form and denominations, 

12 and shall be subject to such terms and conditions of 

13 issue, conversion, redemption, maturation, payment, 

14 and rate of interest as the Secretary may pre15 scribe.’’. 

Æ 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR HEARX LTD. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0000821536
<NAME>         HEARX LTD.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1996
<CASH>                                      17,214,594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,844,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (392,385)
<INVENTORY>                                    293,211
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,249,949
<PP&E>                                       9,312,087
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,475,274)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,617,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,839,564
<BONDS>                                        234,069
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     23,642
<COMMON>                                     6,967,884
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,552,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,617,819
<SALES>                                     13,232,544
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,564,269
<CGS>                                        4,829,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,859,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             159,957
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,455,136)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (9,626,048)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,081,184)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.13)
        

</TABLE>
Selective Placement Factors for IFPM Positions

1 | Page

March 16, 2016

Position 

Mnemonic Position Name Position Complexity

Selective Placement Factors Currency 

Required for 

NWCG 

Qualifications

Primary Core 

Requirement(s)

Secondary Core 

Requirement Required Training

NFPM National Fire Program 

Manager TFLD ICT3 or T2 C&G or RXB2

M-581 or FML or 

LFML No

GFPM Geographic Area Fire 

Program Manager TFLD ICT3 or T2 C&G or RXB2

M-581 or FML or 

LFML No

UFPM Unit Fire Program Manager

High pathway #1 DIVS ICT3 or RXB2 M-581 No

High Pathway #2 ASGS ICT3 M-581 No

Moderate Pathway # 1 TFLD ICT3 or RXB2 M-581 No

Moderate Pathway # 2 HEB1 ICT3 M-581 No

Low ENGB or CRWB or

HMGB ICT4 or RXB2 Yes

WFOS Wildland Fire Operations 

Specialist

High Pathway #1 DIVS ICT3 or RXB2 Yes

High Pathway #2 ASGS ICT3 Yes

Moderate Pathway # 1 TFLD ICT3 or RXB2 Yes

Moderate Pathway # 2 HEB1 ICT3 Yes

Low ENGB or CRWB or 

HMGB ICT4 Yes

PFFS Prescribed Fire and Fuels 

Specialist

High RXB2 ICT3 or TFLD or 

HEB1

Yes

Moderate RXB2 ENGB or CRWB or 

HMGB

Yes

Low ENGB or CRWB or 

FIRB or HMGB ICT4 Yes

SEOP Supervisory Fire Engine 

Operator

Supervising 3 Or Fewer 

Crewmembers ENGB ICT5 S-211 Yes

EMLS Engine Module Supervisor Supervising 4 Or More 

Crewmembers ENGB ICT4 Yes

IHCS

Interagency Hotshot Crew 

Superintendent TFLD and ICT4 and 

FIRB Yes

HEMG Helicopter Manager HEB2 ICT4 Yes
Selective Placement Factors for IFPM Positions

2 | Page

March 16, 2016

SFF Senior Firefighter FFT1 S-290 Yes

CMGR Center Manager

High

EDSD 90 days of wildland 

firefighting experience S-491

No

Moderate No

ACMG

Initial Attack Lead 

Dispatcher/Assistant Center

Manager

EDSD 90 days of wildland 

firefighting experience No

NOTE: For IFPM positions with multiple NWCG qualifications pathways, qualifications cannot be exchanged between pathways. For Example: In order to qualify for a 

moderate complexity Unit Fire Program Manager position, applicants with only HEB1 and RXB2 would not meet the requirements. Applicants who have HEB1 and ICT3 would 

meet the minimum NWCG selective placement factors under qualification pathway # 2.
#### State v. Blackwell

Case below: 361 N.C. 41

No. 490PA04-2

Def’s Third Motion for Appropriate Relief (COA03-793)

Denied 12/14/06
Compensation Information for the Company's Named Executive Officers


 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 COMPENSATION INFORMATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 The table below provides information regarding the 2007
actual cash bonus amount and the 2008 base salary and target cash bonus amount for each “named executive officer” of Exelixis, Inc. 
  

										
	 Named Executive Officer
	  	2007 Actual
Cash Bonus*	  	2008 Annual
Base Salary	  	2008 Target Cash
Bonus
(% of 2008 Base Salary)	 
	 George Scangos (principal executive officer)
	  	$	477,000	  	$	850,000	  	60	%
	 Michael Morrissey
	  	$	220,286	  	$	484,629	  	50	%
	 Frank Karbe (principal financial officer)
	  	$	173,250	  	$	411,950	  	45	%
	 Pamela Simonton
	  	$	118,404	  	$	372,128	  	45	%

  

	*	To be paid in January 2008.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

FRANCISCO GARCIA

- GASTELUM,

a.k.a. Francisco Garcia,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 10221

D.C. No. 4:14

- cr

- 00507

- FRZ

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 15, 2018 * *

Before: FARRIS, BYBEE and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Garcia

- Gastelum appeals from the district court’s judgment

revoking his supervised release and challenges the six

- month sentence imposed

upon revocation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss.

Garcia

- Gastelum argues he should have received a downward variance due

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 22 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 10221

to his previous mental incapacity. Because Garcia

- Gastelum has fully served his

custodial sentence and is not subject to a n additional term of supervised release , we

dismiss the appeal as moot

. See United States v. Palomba , 182 F.3d 1121, 1123

( 9th Cir. 1999) ; s ee also United States v. King , 891 F.3d 868 , 869

– 70 ( 9th Cir.

2018)

.

DISMISSED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, John A. Poserina,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Synergx  Systems certify
that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Synergx Systems
Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition,  results  of  operations  and cash flows of
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  and presented in this  quarterly  report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period cover by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)  Disclosed  in this  quarterly  report  any  change in the  registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during registrant's most
recent fiscal  quarter that has  materially  affected,  or reasonably  likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to
the  registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

     a)  All  significant  deficiencies  in  material  weakness  the  design  or
operation of internal  controls over  financial  reporting  which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:    February 14, 2006
         /S/ John A. Poserina
         John A. Poserina
         Chief Financial Officer
18 USC Sec. 1168

TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 

PART I - CRIMES 

CHAPTER 53 - INDIANS 

 

Sec. 1168. Theft by officers or employees of gaming establishments on Indian lands 

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, or individual licensee of a gaming establishment operated by or for or 

licensed by an Indian tribe pursuant to an ordinance or resolution approved by the National Indian Gaming 

Commission, embezzles, abstracts, purloins, willfully misapplies, or takes and carries away with intent to steal, 

any moneys, funds, assets, or other property of such establishment of a value of $1,000 or less shall be fined not 

more than $250,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both; 

(b) Whoever, being an officer, employee, or individual licensee of a gaming establishment operated by or for or 

licensed by an Indian tribe pursuant to an ordinance or resolution approved by the National Indian Gaming 

Commission, embezzles, abstracts, purloins, willfully misapplies, or takes and carries away with intent to steal, 

any moneys, funds, assets, or other property of such establishment of a value in excess of $1,000 shall be fined 

not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned for not more than twenty years, or both. 

(Added Pub. L. 100-497, Sec. 23, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2487; amended Pub. L. 101-647, title XXXV, Sec. 

3537, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4925.) 

AMENDMENTS 

1990 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101-647 substituted ''or imprisoned'' for ''and be imprisoned for''.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Christopher M. Gleeson, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company and Nicholas Malden, Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    CHRISTOPHER M. GLEESONChristopher M. Gleeson President, Chief Executive Officer and Director


March 11, 2004



/s/    NICHOLAS MALDENNicholas Malden Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


March 11, 2004
No. —, original.

#### Ex parte George Acret.

See *post,*p. 825.
**Smokejumper UnitChecklist #14**

Revised 2010
#### Pedro Ponce DOMINGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. LANG, Robert Briggs, Senior Physician, Warren Cornell, Superintendent, James McDonough, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Michael Schmidt, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-15085

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2006.

Pedro Ponce Dominguez, Chipley, FL, pro se.

*867Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Pedro Ponce Dominguez, a Florida prison inmate proceeding *pro se,*appeals the grant of summary judgment to all defendants in this civil rights action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dominguez essentially reasserts his original claims that state prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in failing to provide him with a liquid diet, failing to issue him passes for a single-man cell and a low bunk, and failing to provide him treatment for wires that he alleges were placed in his body in an illegal surgical procedure.

“[D]eliberate indifference to a prisoner’s serious illness or injury states a cause of action under § 1983.” *Estelle v. Gamble,*429 U.S. 97, 105, 97 S.Ct. 285, 291, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976). To succeed on a claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need, “a plaintiff must set forth evidence of an objectively serious medical need” and “prove that the prison official acted with an attitude of ‘deliberate indifference’ to that serious medical need.” *Farrow v. West,*320 F.3d 1235, 1243 (11th Cir.2003) (internal citations omitted). “[A] serious medical need is considered one that has been diagnosed by a physician as mandating treatment or one that is so obvious that even a lay person would easily recognize the necessity for a doctor’s attention.” *Id.*(citation and internal quotation omitted). “[Djeliberate indifference has three components: (1) subjective knowledge of a risk of serious harm; (2) disregard of that risk; (3) by conduct that is more than mere negligence.” *Id.*at 1245 (internal quotations and citations omitted).

“ ‘[Supervisory officials are not liable under § 1983 for the unconstitutional acts of their subordinates on the basis of *respondeat superior*or vicarious liability.’ ” *Cottone v. Jenne,*326 F.3d 1352, 1360 (11th Cir.2003) (quoting *Hartley v. Parnell,*193 F.3d 1263, 1269 (11th Cir.1999)). Rather, such liability attaches under § 1983 only “when the supervisor personally participates in the alleged unconstitutional conduct or when there is a causal connection between the actions of a supervising official and the alleged constitutional deprivation.” *Hartley,*193 F.3d at 1269 (internal quotations and citations omitted).

Because Dominguez presented no competent evidence to substantiate his claim that the defendant prison officials had been deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs, the district court was duty bound to grant these officials summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on
the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                         
|------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|March 6, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Marliss D. Johnson
|              |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Vice President, Controller and Treasurer
|              |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Marliss D. Johnson                      



|                                      |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|ampco pittsburgh | 2007 annual report |  |  |  |
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

URIAH DAVIS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D23-1089

LT Case No. 2001-CF-514

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed July 18, 2023

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Clay County,

Don H. Lester, Judge.

Uriah Davis, Lake Butler, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EISNAUGLE, BOATWRIGHT and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
No. 54.

#### United States *v.*Ragen; United States *v.*Arnold *W.*Kruse; and United States *v.*Lester A. Kruse.

No. 55.

No. 56.

February 2, 1942.

Mr. Justice Roberts, Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications.

314 U. S. 513.