alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluations; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Francisco Puñal

Francisco PuñalSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IE CREW TIME REPORT >]

[oy cRew nae Ty CREW HOMER

[5] OFFICE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE

TRENaNE [errRenoween

oT 10] m1 z my
cs pare pare

‘ . cuss

mas Nan OF EMPLOYEE Cone aT TS
Ls or oF or a

fayeewanis

faz) OFFICER IF GUARGE [Sgrance) [aay TE (Ocarina

[95] NANE (Person Portngo Emergency Tere Report i DATE

21301 STANDARD FORM 261 (5/75)
Preserbed by USDAUSD![NWCG Hanebock No.2
**Exhibit 32.1**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Westlund, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Steve Westlund
 Steve Westlund
 Chief Executive Officer, President
 November 19, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6415
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LOUIS NOMAR, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-65, CA-95-1140-2) Submitted: February 4, 1997 Decided: March 11, 1997 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louis Nomar, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nomar , No. CR-95- 65; CA-95-1140-2 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Nomination for Airward

Award Category (see 352 DM 4.7C below):

Nominee’s Full Name:

Pilot Certification Number (if applicable):

Date of Birth:

Narrative of the event and actions taken (this will later be printed in the Airward Newsletter as well as 

accompany the Airward certificate and hat): 

***

Reference: 352 DM 4 (excerpt)

4.6 Processing and Approval. All nominations, except Airwards (refer to paragraph 4.11D), will be 

processed through the respective Bureau National Aviation Manager/Aviation Safety Manager or their 

designee through the NBC AMD Aviation Safety Manager for eligibility verification, then reviewed for 

approval by the Bureau’s DOI Aviation Management Board of Directors (ABOD) member.

4.11 Airwards. This award is established to provide timely recognition to any individual who has 

demonstrated positive behavior or actions promoting DOI aviation safety, such as correcting a hazardous 

situation, submitting a good idea, or just making a difference.

A. Standard. Any individual having sufficient knowledge of the individual's action may 

submit a nomination. 

B. Criteria. The circumstances surrounding the event should be clearly documented, using a 

letter, memorandum, e-mail, SAFECOM (AMD-34, www.safecom.gov), or other form of documentation, 

providing sufficient detail to support an Airward nomination.

C. Award. The recipient will receive an Airward Certificate along with an embroidered 

baseball cap.

D. Procedures. Along with the nomination, a photograph of the recipient and a short 

paragraph, suitable for publication in the Airward News (http://amd.nbc.gov/safety/airwards), should be 

submitted to the Bureau Aviation Safety Manager or the NBC AMD Aviation Safety Office. The Bureau 

Aviation Safety Manager or designee will review the award and is encouraged to provide additional 

correspondence, such as a letter of appreciation, to accompany the Airward Certificate. The NBC AMD 

Aviation Safety Manager will determine if the nomination meets the criteria of the Airwards program. If 

the nomination is valid, the individual’s Airward Certificate will be forwarded to the recipient’s Aviation 

Safety Manager or supervisor for formal presentation. The NBC AMD Aviation Safety Office will 

promote and publicize the awards and maintain a record of all Airward recipients.
SIT/209 Enhancement Form 

***Please email all enhancement forms to nicc.intel@firenet.gov***

Name: __________________ Date: ___________________

Agency: __________________ GACC: ____________________

Local Dispatch Center: ________________

Phone: ________________

Email: ________________

Iden�fy the pain point in the SIT/209 Applica�on: 

Describe the proposed enhancement and how it would alleviate the SIT/209 pain 

point: 

Describe who would benefit from this enhancement:
Describe the pros and cons of this enhancement:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 106 (Thursday, June 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12967]



[[Page 26872]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Perceived Discrimination and Health Disparities.
    Date: June 22, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 201 
Wisconsin Avenue, 2C218, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Alfonso R. Latoni, Ph.D., Deputy Chief And 
Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National 
Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Room 
2C218, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#741815001b1a1d15341a1d155a1a1d1c5a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1975786d767770785977707837777071377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Muscle Growth and Regeneration in Aging.
    Date: July 31, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call)
    Contact Person: Elaine Lewis, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, Gateway 
Building, Suite 2C212, MSC-9205, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-402-7707, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e2878e838b8c878e87958b91a28c8b83cc8c8b8acc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f7929b969e99929b92809e84b7999e96d9999e9fd9909881">[email protected]</span></a>.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 28, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-12967 Filed 6-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.14


                                                                 October 9, 2007


Standard Drilling, Inc.
1667 K Street, NW
Suite 1230
Washington, DC 20006

Attention: Board of Directors of Standard Drilling, Inc.

Gentleman:

This is my notice to the Board of Directors that I am electing to terminate my
employment, effective immediately, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Standard Drilling, Inc. for "Good Reason" as set forth in Section 5 Subparagraph
E of my Employment Agreement effective as of February 14, 2006. Additionally, I
am electing to resign as a Director of the Company.

Sincerely,

/s/ Prentis B. Tomlinson, Jr.
-----------------------------------------
Prentis B. Tomlinson, Jr.
#### In the Matter of Ruth Marie Pollack, Respondent, v Matthew G. Kiernan et al., Appellants.

[961 NYS2d 922]

—Order, Supreme Court, Kings County (Herbert Kramer, J.), entered on or about November 17, 2011, which granted the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to the extent of directing the Appellate Division, Second Department, to forward certain documents in petitioner’s disciplinary file to Supreme Court for in camera review, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the petition denied, and the proceeding dismissed.

Judiciary Law § 90 (10) provides that the Appellate Division has the jurisdiction to permit documents pertaining to an attorney disciplinary proceeding to be divulged. Therefore, Supreme Court lacked the authority to order disclosure of such documents.

Concur—Andrias, J.P., Moskowitz, Freedman, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31- 1996
<PERIOD-END>                  Sept-30-1996
<CASH>                        4,306,238
<RECEIVABLES>                 1,418,335
<SECURITIES>                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        54,334,797
<DEPRECIATION>                12,379,498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                48,192,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         3,897,587
<BONDS>                       0
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    44,294,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  48,192,168
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              11,800,133
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 5,243,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              6,160,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  518,280
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Max Geshwind, Deceased. David M. Geshwind, Appellant; Frank Geshwind, Respondent.

Submitted August 10, 2009;

decided October 22, 2009

Reported below, 60 AD3d 679.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order of affirmance, dismissed as untimely *(see Eaton v State of New York,*76 NY2d 824 [1990]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying appellant’s motion for reargument, reconsideration and amendment of its decision, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
jQuery(document).ready(function ($) {

  if ($(".lifecycle")[0]){ 

    $('#tabs li a:not(:first)').addClass('inactive');
    $('.lifecycle').hide();
    $('.lifecycle:first').show();
        
    $('#tabs li a').click(function(){
        var t = $(this).attr('id');
      if($(this).hasClass('inactive')){ //this is the start of our condition 
        $('#tabs li a').addClass('inactive');           
        $(this).removeClass('inactive');
        
        $('.lifecycle').hide();
        $('#'+ t + 'C').fadeIn('slow');
     }

     
    });

  }
    


}(jQuery));
# Drill #12

&"Times New Roman,Bold"Helitack/Helispot		&"Times New Roman,Bold"Drill #12

&P	

&P	

# Code Page

# image1.png
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# FY 18 Capacity Grant Guidance Letter

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

### Archived Content

In an effort to keep nifa.usda.gov current, the archive contains outdated information that may not reflect current policy or programs.

The National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIF A), like the rest of the Federal Government, is funded under a temporary FY 2018 Continuing Resolution (CR). Funding levels available to support our programs during the CR were reduced as a result of an across-the-board reduction of0.6791 percent from the 2017 discretionary appropriations levels. Due to the 18.90% CR level, funding amounts were further reduced below the first quarter amount at 25%. NIFA applied additional reductions for program administration and other set asides as required by law.

FY 18 Capacity Grant Guidance Letter(pdf - 1.19 MB)

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

funding opportunityNew Beginning for Tribal Students Program

funding opportunityResearch Facilities Act Program

funding opportunityAgriculture and Food Research Initiative - Education and Workforce Development

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

postProtecting Our Water

postNumber of AFRI FY 2024 Commodity Board Co-Funding Topics Breaks Record; Expands Focus on Nutrition 

postTropical Birds Could Tolerate Warming Better Than Expected 

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

postTropical Birds Could Tolerate Warming Better Than Expected 

postCultivating the Future: Agricultural Innovations for Climate Resilience

postNevada Researcher Aims to Improve Sorghum Hybrids for Dairy Cattle Feed
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to

§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Annual Report of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc., (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2008,
(the Report), I, William P. Hales, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ William P. Hales                 
|William P. Hales                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)        

December 19, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 255 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 255

  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to empower the States to set the 
     maximum annual percentage rates applicable to consumer credit 
                 transactions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 15, 2009

 Mr. Whitehouse (for himself and Mr. Durbin) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to empower the States to set the 
     maximum annual percentage rates applicable to consumer credit 
                 transactions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Empowering States' Right To Protect 
Consumers Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. LIMITS ON ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATES.

    Chapter 2 of the Truth In Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1631 et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 141. LIMITS ON ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATES.

    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the annual percentage 
rate applicable to any consumer credit transaction (other than a 
residential mortgage transaction), including any fees associated with 
such a transaction, may not exceed the maximum rate permitted by the 
laws of the State in which the consumer resides.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7463
<ALLOWANCES>                                       335
<INVENTORY>                                       7024
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 17875
<PP&E>                                           10860
<DEPRECIATION>                                    7785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   24902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            22447
<BONDS>                                            744
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         12213
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10502)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     24902
<SALES>                                          12639
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 12639
<CGS>                                             7820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     7820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    20
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 376
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    286
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                286
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       286
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>