54066 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 21, 2009 / Notices 

and, after the investigation, issue an 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

order. 

ADDRESSES: The amended complaint, 

except for any confidential information 

contained therein, is available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 

20436, telephone 202–205–2000. 

Hearing impaired individuals are 

advised that information on this matter 

can be obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rett 

Snotherly, Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–2599. 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 

210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2009). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the amended complaint, the 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

on October 14, 2009, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain dual access locks 

or products containing same that 

infringe one or more of claims 1–21 of 

U.S. Patent No. 7,021,537 and claims 1– 

20 of U.S. Patent No. 7,036,728, and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are— 

Safe Skies, LLC, 165 Norfolk Street, 

Brooklyn, NY 11235 

David Tropp, 165 Norfolk Street, 

Brooklyn, NY 11235 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

C&C Luggage Manufacturing Co., Ltd., 

No. 1, Crown Road, The Second Ind. 

Park, Sanxiang, Zhongshan, 

Guangdong, China 

Formosa Tai Rank Industrial Corp., 

Room 1102, 11th Floor, 328 Sung 

Chiang Road, Taipei, Taiwan, 104, 

Hangzhou Gema Suitcases & Bags Co., 

Ltd 

M16–1–5 Hangshou Economic and 

Technologic Development Zone, 

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China 

La Pearl Luggage and Leather Goods Co., 

Ltd., No. 441, Xihuan Road, Jiangmen 

Guangdong, 529000 China 

Hinomoto Jomae, Ltd. 1–19–19 

Nishigahara, Kita-Ku, Tokyo, Japan 

Sinox Company, Ltd. 3F, No. 2, Lane 93, 

Chien-1 Road, Chung-Ho City, Taipei 

Hsien, 235, Taiwan 

Yi Feng Manufacturing, Co., Ltd. 

Zhangyang Zone, Shangmutou Town, 

Dongguan City, China 523637 

Jin Tay Industries Co., Ltd. 486 Section 

3, Ming Chih Road, Taishan Hsiang, 

Taipei Hsien, Taiwan 

FULLYEAR-Brother Enterprise, Co., 

Ltd., 41–21, Guan Tso Street, Fu 

Shing, Changhwa Taiwan, 506 

Zhuhai SkyGood Tech. Industrial Corp., 

Ltd., 4/F., 3rd Building, 30 Nanwan 

Road (north), Nanping, Zhuhai, 

Guangdong, China 

Ningbo Xianfeng Art & Craft Co., Ltd., 

Room B–303, Zhongshanyinzuo, No. 

579, Zhongshan East Road, Ningbo, 

China 

Paloma Enterprises Co., Ltd., 3F, No. 

1320, Chung-Cheng Road, Taoyun 

City, Taiwan 

Tekraft Industrial Co., Ltd., Room 5E10, 

No. 5 Hsin Yi Road, Sec. 5, Taipei, 

Taiwan 

Hangzhou Travelsky Co., Ltd., 1–6–G 

Guodu Development Building, 182 

Zhaohui Road, Hangshou, China 

The Sun Lock Company Ltd., Room 5, 

Block C, 16/F, Hang Wai, Industrial 

Center, 6 Kin Tai Street, Tuen Mun, 

New Territories, Hong Kong 

Alloy Metal Manufactory, Ltd., Flat H, 

3/F, On Ho Industrial Building, 17–19 

Shing Wan Road, Tai Wai, Shatin, 

New Territories, Hong Kong 

Cometform, Ltd., Unit 24 Irving Way, 

Garrick Industrial Estate, Hendon, 

London NW9 6AQ, England 

Design Go Ltd., Unit 1, Mill Hill 

Industrial Estate, Flower Lane, 

London NW7 2HU, England 

Franzen International, S. Franzen Sohne 

GmbH, Fuerbachstrasse 8, D–42719 

Solingen, Germany 

M–Power Lock Manufactory, Unit 2702, 

Modern Warehouse, 6 Shing Yip 

Street, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong 

Kong 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Rett Snotherly, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the amended complaint 

and the notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the amended complaint 

and the notice of investigation. 

Extensions of time for submitting 

responses to the amended complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

amended complaint and in this notice 

may be deemed to constitute a waiver of 

the right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the amended complaint 

and this notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the amended complaint and 

this notice and to enter an initial 

determination and a final determination 

containing such findings, and may 

result in the issuance of an exclusion 

order or a cease and desist order or both 

directed against a respondent. 

Issued: October 14, 2009. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–25245 Filed 10–20–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1047 (Review)] 

Ironing Tables From China 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of Commission 

determination to conduct a full five-year 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 21, 2009 / Notices 54067 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

2The Commission has found the response 

submitted by Penn A Kem LLC to be individually 

adequate. Comments from other interested parties 

will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). 

review concerning the antidumping 

duty order on ironing tables from China. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with a full 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)) to determine whether 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on ironing tables from China 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury within 

a reasonably foreseeable time. A 

schedule for the review will be 

established and announced at a later 

date. For further information concerning 

the conduct of this review and rules of 

general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

DATES: Effective Date: October 5, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 5, 2009, the Commission 

determined that it should proceed to a 

full review in the subject five-year 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Act. The Commission found that 

both the domestic and respondent 

interested party group responses to its 

notice of institution (74 FR 31755, July 

2, 2009) were adequate. A record of the 

Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, 

and any individual Commissioner’s 

statements will be available from the 

Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

Authority: This review is being conducted 

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act 

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 

section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. 

Issued: October 14, 2009. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–25247 Filed 10–20–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1046 (Review)] 

Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol From China 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited fiveyear review concerning the antidumping 

duty order on tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol 

from China. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of an expedited 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty order on tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol 

from China would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. For further information 

concerning the conduct of this review 

and rules of general application, consult 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

DATES: Effective Date: October 5, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Angela M.W. Newell (202–708–5409), 

Office of Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. 

Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On October 5, 2009, 

the Commission determined that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (74 

FR 31752, July 2, 2009) of the subject 

five-year review was adequate and that 

the respondent interested party group 

response was inadequate. The 

Commission did not find any other 

circumstances that would warrant 

conducting a full review.1 Accordingly, 

the Commission determined that it 

would conduct an expedited review 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. 

Staff report.—A staff report 

containing information concerning the 

subject matter of the review will be 

placed in the nonpublic record on 

November 2, 2009, and made available 

to persons on the Administrative 

Protective Order service list for this 

review. A public version will be issued 

thereafter, pursuant to section 

207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions.—As provided in 

section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s 

rules, interested parties that are parties 

to the review and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,2 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

review may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determination the 

Commission should reach in the review. 

Comments are due on or before 

November 5, 2009 and may not contain 

new factual information. Any person 

that is neither a party to the five-year 

review nor an interested party may 

submit a brief written statement (which 

shall not contain any new factual 

information) pertinent to the review by 

November 5, 2009. However, should the 

Department of Commerce extend the 

time limit for its completion of the final 

results of its review, the deadline for 

comments (which may not contain new 

factual information) on Commerce’s 

final results is three business days after 

the issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. The Commission’s rules do not 

authorize filing of submissions with the 

Secretary by facsimile or electronic 

means, except to the extent permitted by 

section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, 

as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 

2002). Even where electronic filing of a 

document is permitted, certain 

documents must also be filed in paper 

form, as specified in II(C) of the 

Commission’s Handbook on Electronic 

Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 

(November 8, 2002). 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES