Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 21, 2009 / Notices 54029 

1The individual members of the FGPA are 

Christopher Ranch L.L.C., The Garlic Company, 

Valley Garlic, and Vessey and Company, Inc. 

and examinations. This redundancy not 

only creates inefficiencies and 

additional costs for applicants, but also 

results in the offices around the world 

duplicating a substantial amount of 

work. The USPTO and many offices 

around the world now face a growing 

backlog of pending applications, and 

applicants must wait longer times for an 

application to receive an examination. 

Through work sharing, an office 

eliminates the redundancy by utilizing 

the work of another office thereby 

expediting patent prosecution. 

The USPTO is conducting a 

roundtable to evaluate the patent 

community and/or the public sector’s 

views on work sharing, including 

current work-sharing efforts, as well as 

suggestions for future work-sharing 

opportunities. The USPTO plans to 

invite a number of roundtable 

participants from patent user groups, 

practitioners, industry, independent 

inventor organizations, academia, and 

Government. To ensure that the USPTO 

is receiving a balanced array of views on 

work sharing, the USPTO also plans to 

have a few ‘‘at-large’’ participants based 

upon requests received in response to 

this notice. To ensure that all who are 

speaking will have a meaningful chance 

to do so, the number of participants in 

the roundtable is limited. Those who 

wish to participate in the roundtable 

must do so by written request. Members 

of the public who wish solely to attend 

and observe the roundtable need not 

submit a request. 

Any member of the public, however, 

may submit written comments for 

consideration by the USPTO on issues 

raised at the roundtable or on any other 

issues pertaining to work sharing. 

Persons submitting written comments 

should note that the USPTO does not 

plan to provide a ‘‘comment and 

response’’ analysis of such comments as 

this notice does not constitute a notice 

of proposed rule making. 

The USPTO plans to make the 

roundtable available via Web cast. Web 

cast information will be available on the 

USPTO’s Internet Web site before the 

roundtable. The written comments and 

list of the roundtable participants and 

their associations will be posted on the 

USPTO’s Internet Web site. 

Dated: October 14, 2009. 

David J. Kappos, 

Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual 

Property and Director of the United States 

Patent and Trademark Office. 

[FR Doc. E9–25262 Filed 10–20–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–16–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–831] 

Fresh Garlic from the People’s 

Republic of China: Partial Rescission 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Martha Douthit or Summer Avery, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 6, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5050 or (202) 482– 

4052, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 24, 2008, the 

Department published a notice of 

initiation of an administrative review of 

fresh garlic from the People’s Republic 

of China (PRC), covering the period 

November 1, 2007 through October 31, 

2008. See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 73 FR 79055 (December 24, 2008) 

(Initiation Notice). 

On April 3, 2009, the Fresh Garlic 

Producers Association (FGPA) and its 

individual members1 (collectively, 

Petitioners) withdrew their request of 

review of certain companies in this 

administrative review. On April 28, 

2009, Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., 

Ltd. (Xinboda), also withdrew its own 

review request. See the Attachment to 

this notice for the list of companies for 

which the Department is rescinding its 

review. 

Partial Rescission 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if a party 

that requested the review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of the initiation notice of 

the requested review. Further, pursuant 

to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department 

is permitted to extend this time limit if 

it is reasonable to do so. On March 24, 

2009, at the request of Petitioners, the 

Department extended the deadline for 

the withdrawal of review requests to 

March 31, 2009. On March 31, 2009, the 

Department further extended the 

deadline for the withdrawal of review 

requests to April 3, 2009. 

For all but one of the companies listed 

in the Attachment, Petitioners were the 

only party that requested the review. In 

addition to Petitioners’ request for a 

review of Xinboda, the company itself 

requested a review. Although Xinboda’s 

withdrawal of its request for a review 

was beyond the April 3 deadline, the 

Department has decided to accept its 

withdrawal given that Petitioners timely 

withdrew their request for review of 

Xinboda. 

Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this 

review with respect to all companies 

named in the Attachment to this notice. 

Assessment Rates 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. For those 

companies for which this review has 

been rescinded and which have a 

separate rate, antidumping duties shall 

be assessed at rates equal to the cash 

deposit of estimated antidumping duties 

required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(2). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of this notice. For 

those companies for which this review 

has been rescinded, but which do not 

have a separate rate at this time (and 

thus remain part of the PRC–wide 

entity), the Department will issue 

assessment instructions upon the 

completion of this administrative 

review. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers for whom this review is 

being rescinded of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
54030 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 21, 2009 / Notices 

1The petitioner is Seaman Paper Company of 

Massachusetts, Inc. 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which may be subject to sanctions. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: October 8, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

Attachment 

The following companies were named 

in our Initiation Notice. Subsequently, 

interested parties withdrew all relevant 

requests for review for these companies. 

Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this 

administrative review with respect to 

these companies. 

American Pioneer Shipping 

Anhui Dongqian Foods Ltd. 

Anqiu Haoshun Trade Co., Ltd. 

APS Qingdao 

Chengwu County Yuanxiang Industry 

& Commerce Co., Ltd 

Chiping Shengkang Foodstuff Co., 

Ltd. 

Hangzhou Guanyu Foods Co., Ltd. 

Hongqiao International Logistics Co 

IT Logistics Qingdao Branch 

Jinan Solar Summit International Co., 

Ltd. 

Jining Highton Trading Co., Ltd. 

Jinxian County Huaguang Food 

Import & Export, Ltd. 

Jinxiang Dacheng Food Co., Ltd. 

Jinxiang Hejia Co., Ltd. 

Jinxiang Jinma Fruits Vegetables 

Products Co., Ltd 

Jinxiang Tianheng Trade Co., Ltd. 

Juye Homestead Fruits and Vegetables 

Co., Ltd. 

Laizhou Xubin Fruits and Vegetables 

Linyi City Heding District Jiuli 

Foodstuff Co 

Ningjin Ruifeng Foodstuff Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Lianghe International Trade 

Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Tiantaixing Foods Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Winner Foods Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Yuankang International 

Samyoung America (Shanghai) Inc. 

Shandong Chengshun Farm Produce 

Trading Co., Ltd. 

Shandong Chenhe Int’l Trading Co., 

Ltd. 

Shandong Dongsheng Eastsun Foods 

Co., Ltd. 

Shandong Garlic Company 

Shandong Jinxiang Zhengyang Import 

& Export Co., Ltd. 

Shandong Sanxing Food Co., Ltd. 

Shandong Xingda Foodstuffs Group 

Co., Ltd. 

Shandong Yipin Agro (Group) Co., 

Ltd 

Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd. 

T&S International, LLC 

Taian Eastsun Foods Co., Ltd. 

Weifang Chenglong Import & Export 

Co., Ltd. 

Weifang Naike Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. 

WSSF Corporation (Weifang) 

Xiamen Huamin Import Export 

Company 

You Shi Li International Trading Co., 

Ltd. 

Zhangzhou Xiangcheng Rainbow 

Greenland Food Co., Ltd. 

Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd. 

Zhengzhou Yuanli Trading Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. E9–25350 Filed 10–20–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–894 

Certain Tissue Paper Products from 

the People’s Republic of China: Notice 

of Partial Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (the Department) is 

rescinding in part the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain tissue paper products from 

the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for 

the period March 1, 2008, to February 

28, 2009, with respect to Sunlake De ́cor 

Co., Ltd. (Sunlake). This partial 

rescission is based on the withdrawal of 

the request for review of Sunlake by the 

only interested party that requested the 

review the petitioner.1

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 21, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brian Smith or Gemal Brangman, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–1766 or (202) 482– 

3773, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 2, 2009, the Department 

published a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

tissue paper products from the PRC. See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity to Request 

Administrative Review, 74 FR 9077 

(March 2, 2009). In response, the 

petitioner timely requested an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

tissue paper products from the PRC for 

entries of the subject merchandise 

during the period March 1, 2008, 

through February 28, 2009, for Sunlake 

(i.e., an exporter of the subject 

merchandise). Therefore, on April 21, 

2009, the Department initiated a review 

of Sunlake. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 74 FR 19042 

(April 27, 2009). 

In a letter dated June 30, 2009, the 

petitioner withdrew its request for 

review of Sunlake and requested that 

the Department rescind the review with 

respect to it. No other party has 

requested a review of Sunlake. This 

administrative review will continue 

with respect to Max Fortune Industrial 

Limited and Max Fortune (FETDE) 

Paper Products Co., Ltd. (collectively 

referred to as ‘‘Max Fortune’’) and 

Seaman Paper Asia Company Ltd. 

Rescission, in Part, of Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if the party 

who requested the review withdraws 

the request within 90 days of the date 

of publication of the notice of initiation 

of the requested review. Accordingly, 

the petitioner timely withdrew its 

request for review of Sunlake within the 

90-day period and no other party 

requested a review of Sunlake’s entries. 

Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this 

administrative review with respect to 

Sunlake. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. For the company for 

which this review has been rescinded, 

antidumping duties shall be assessed, if 

applicable, at rates equal to the cash 

deposit of estimated antidumping duties 

required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES