alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES v. COTTON VALLEY OPERATORS COMMITTEE et al.

Civil Action No. 2209.

District Court, W. D. Louisiana, Shreveport Division.

March 13, 1948.

See also 75 F.Supp. 1.

Tom C. Clark, Atty. Gen., Jno. F. Sonnett, Geo. B. Haddock, W. B. Watson Snyder, and Jas. R. Browning, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., and Malcolm E. Lafargue, U. S. Atty., of Shreveport, La., for plaintiff.

Jno. M. Madison, W. S. Wilkinson, Wilkinson, Lewis & Wilkinson, Jno. T. Guyton, J. R. Goff, and Sidney G. Myers, all of Shreveport, La., and Vernon Roberts, of Ada, Okl., for defendants.

DAWKINS, District Judge.

After due consideration of the motion to quash service of process, made by J. J. Frommer on whom it was served for the Cotton Valley Operators’ Committee, without finding it necessary to enter into an extended discussion of authorities, this Court is of the opinion that the same should be and it is accordingly overruled. See United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co., 259 U.S. 344, 42 S.Ct. 570, 66 L.Ed. 975, 27 A. L.R. 762; United States v. Greater New *36York Live Poultry Chamber of Commerce, D.C., 30 F.2d 939; Dowd v. United Mine Workers, 8 Cir., 235 F. 1; Sperry Products, Inc., v. Ass’n American Railroads, 2 Cir., 132 F.2d 408, 145 A.L.R. 694; Hecht, Trustees, v. Malley, 265 U.S. 144, 44 S.Ct. 462, 68 L.Ed. 949; and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 17(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
#### Skip Funt, Appellant, v Human Resources Administration of the City of New York, Respondent.

Submitted September 13, 2010;

decided November 23, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 1286** 

GERALDINE M. JONES ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

FOOD EMPLOYERS LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATION AND UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS PENSION FUND PLAN ,
Defendant

– Appellee ,
and

KAREN STAFFORD ,
Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Paul W. Grimm , District Judge. ( 8:12

- cv
- 00891

- PWG )

Submitted : December 22, 2014 Decided: January 7, 2015

Before FLOYD and THACKER , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Geraldine M. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Laura O. Aradi , Sharon McNeilly Goodman , Barry Steven Slevin , SLEVIN & HART, PC , Washingt on, D.C., for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Geraldine M. Jones appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing all but one of her claims in her civil complaint and
granting summary judgment to Appel lee on her remaining claim. *

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm. Jones v. Food Emp’rs Labor Relations

Ass’n & United Food & Commercial Workers Pension Fund Plan , No.

8:12

- cv
- 00891

- PWG (D. Md. Nov. 21, 2012 & Feb 20, 2014 ) . We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We previously remanded this case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether Jones was entitled to have her time to file an appeal reopened under Rule 4(a)(6) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure . The district court determined that Jones was entitled to a reopening of the appeal period and an extension of the appeal period under Rul e 4(a)(5)

. Accordingly, we deny Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-16707, 333-37758, 333-69658, 333-88636, 333-92883, 333-105976, 333-126923; and Form S-3 No. 333-34124) of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., of our reports dated February 16, 2007,with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Phoenix, Arizona 

February 16, 2007
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2816 

To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation 

Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion of the adoption credit and 

adoption assistance programs and to allow the adoption credit to be 

claimed in the year expenses are incurred, regardless of when the adoption becomes final. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2009 

Mr. BUNNING (for himself, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. 

BURR, Mr. CASEY, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. ENZI, Mr. 

INHOFE, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. THUNE, and 

Mr. VITTER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 

Reconciliation Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion 

of the adoption credit and adoption assistance programs 

and to allow the adoption credit to be claimed in the 

year expenses are incurred, regardless of when the adoption becomes final. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2816 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adoption Tax Relief 

3 Guarantee Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF APPLICABILITY OF SUNSET OF THE 

5 ECONOMIC GROWTH AND TAX RELIEF REC6 ONCILIATION ACT OF 2001 WITH RESPECT TO 

7 ADOPTION CREDIT AND ADOPTION ASSIST8 ANCE PROGRAMS. 

9 Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 

10 Reconciliation Act of 2001 is amended by adding at the 

11 end the following new subsection: 

12 ‘‘(c) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

13 the amendments made by section 202 (relating to expan14 sion of adoption credit and adoption assistance pro15 grams).’’. 

16 SEC. 3. ALLOWANCE OF ADOPTION CREDIT IN YEAR OF EX17 PENSES. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 23(a) of 

19 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to allowance 

20 of credit) is amended to read as follows: 

21 ‘‘(2) YEAR CREDIT ALLOWED.—The credit 

22 under paragraph (1) with respect to any expense 

23 shall be allowed for the taxable year in which such 

24 expense is paid or incurred.’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2816 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to expenses paid or incurred in 

3 taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32-1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Financial Report of NoFire Technologies,
Inc. on Form 10QSB for the Quarter ended 2/28/06 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Sam Gottfried, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10QSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: April 11,2006

Name  /s/ Sam Gottfried (CEO)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
 the signature that  appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written  statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to NoFire Technologies,
Inc. and will be retained by NoFire Technologies, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Exhibit 32-2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Financial Report of NoFire Technologies,
Inc. on Form 10QSB for the Quarter ended 2/28/06 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
I, Sam Oolie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10QSBfully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and


(2) The information contained in the Form 10QSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: April 11,2006

Name  /s/ Sam Oolie (CFO)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
 the signature that  appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written  statement required by Section 906, has been

provided to NoFire Technologies,
Inc. and will be retained by NoFire Technologies, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XIII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission of the Partnership's  Annual Report
on Form  10-K for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: March 24, 2004

                                           /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                           Title:  Chief Executive Officer


                                           A  signed  original  of this  written
                                           statement required by Section 906 has
                                           been  provided  to  CNL  Income  Fund
                                           XIII,  Ltd.  and will be  retained by
                                           CNL  Income  Fund  XIII,   Ltd.   and
                                           furnished  to  the   Securities   and
                                           Exchange Commission or its staff upon
                                           request.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reportsdated March 5, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial statements andmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial  reporting included in the Annual Report of Warren Resources, Inc. on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements ofWarren Resources, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-130109,effective December 2, 2005) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-125277,effective May 26, 2005).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Oklahoma City, OklahomaMarch 5, 2007

----
# Retirement

## Please follow this link to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management website for your retirement needs:

                      - OPM Retirement Services 

## Required Forms for Retirement (CSRS)

                      - SF2801 Application for immediate retirement (CSRS) 
                      - SF2818 Continuation of Life Insurance Coverage as an Annuitant or Compensationer
                      - W-4P  Withholding Certificate for Pension or Annuity Payments 
                      - FEGLI Life Insurance Chart 

## Required Forms for Retirement (FERS) 

                      - SF3107 Application for Immediate Retirement FERS 
                      - SF2818 Continuation of Life Insurance Coverage as an Annuitant or Compensationer
                      - W-4P  Withholding Certificate for Pension or Annuity Payments 
                      - FEGLI Life Insurance Chart 

*Retirement forms need to be returned to Human Resources Attn: Retirement Specialist*  

## Required Ethics Forms for Retirement (FERS and CSRS)

                      - Post-Employment Restrictions

*Ethic forms need to be returned to Human Resources Attn: Ethics Counselor*

## Firefighter/Law Enforcement Retirement Team (FLERT) 

                      - FLERT website
                      - SPDs for Firefighters and Law Enforcement

## Human Resources

-  Human Resources Contacts 
-  Benefits 
-  eOPF 
-  Employee Relations 
-  Ethics 
-  Forms 
-  Jobs and Human Resources 
-  Telework 
-  OWCP 
-  Performance Management 
-  Rating Management 
-  Retirement 
-  Security 
-  Manager’s Corner
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0260

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DANIELLE WOOD,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 7, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 27 2023

01/27/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0260
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11040

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAVID CHIN KWAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CR-83-1

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and OWEN and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Chin Kwan appeals his sentence for conspiracy to possess with 

intent to distribute marijuana. He contends that the district court imposed an 

unconstitutional, standard, supervised release condition requiring him to 

“permit a probation officer to visit [him] at any time at home or elsewhere and 

permit confiscation of any contraband observed in plain view by the probation 

officer.” He further argues that the district court procedurally erred by 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 19, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11040 Document: 00515003018 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2019
No. 18-11040

2

imposing the condition without explanation. Our review is for plain error only. 

See United States v. Cabello, 916 F.3d 543, 544 (5th Cir. 2019); United States 

v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 361 (5th Cir. 2009); see also Puckett v. 

United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009) (explaining plain error standard of 

review).

We recently upheld a similar, if not identical, condition on plain error 

review, noting that we had not yet addressed the constitutionality or 

substantive reasonableness of such a condition or whether a sentencing court 

must give reasons for imposing a standard supervised release condition. 

Cabello, 916 F.3d at 544. Because our law remains unsettled and the other 

federal circuits have reached divergent conclusions, Kwan cannot satisfy the 

second prong of the plain error test—that the error be clear or obvious under 

existing law. See United States v. McRae, 702 F.3d 806, 833 (5th Cir. 2012); 

compare United States v. Kappes, 782 F.3d 828, 844, 850-51 (7th Cir. 2015), 

with United States v. Clarke, 428 F. App’x 712, 713 (9th Cir. 2011); see also 

Puckett, 556 U.S. at 135.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-11040 Document: 00515003018 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/19/2019
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Ashby, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 802]

— Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 31, 2001 *(People v Ashby,*289 AD2d 588 [2001]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered January 18, 2000.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Eng, EJ., Hall, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 77-212]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the Commission has reviewed an application, filed August 26, 2008 and supplemented January 30, 2009, requesting approval of a proposed plan to provide spring frost protection and late fall irrigation water for commercial crops and hay in the Potter Valley Project area, FERC Project No. 77. Commission staff has prepared a final Environmental Assessment (EA) and in the final EA, staff analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed plan and concludes that approval of the plan, with appropriate environmental measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.

                    The Order Granting Amendment of License Article 52 was issued on October 14, 2009 and the final EA is attached to the order. A copy of the final EA is also on file with the Commission and is available for public inspection. The final EA may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or toll-free at 1-866-208-3372, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-25254 Filed 10-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
----

Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Michael Ash, CFO of The Tirex Corporation (the "Company")do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period endedDecember 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
2. 

The informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ 

  Michael Ash                                   Michael Ash, CFO 

Date: February 13, 2008
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Corey E. Becoats, Appellant.

Submitted September 27, 2010;

decided October 14, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted only to the extent that Donald M. Thompson, Esq., care of Easton Thompson Kasperek Shiffrin LLR 16 West Main Street, Suite 243, Rochester, New York 14614 is assigned without fee to represent appellant on the appeal herein. Counsel may, however, apply for reimbursement of necessary disbursements incurred in connection with the assignment.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00327-CV

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Ben White Land, L.P., Appellee

FROM THE PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. 2289, HONORABLE GUY HERMAN, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss its appeal requesting that this Court 

dismiss this appeal and assess costs against appellant. 

Therefore, we dismiss this appeal on motion of appellant. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).

 

Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel 

Dismissed on Appellant=s Motion

Filed: July 26, 2002

Do Not Publish