alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Howard Thomson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Terrace Ventures Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2006, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                         



| | By:    | /s/ Howard Thomson                                       
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                          
| | Name:  | HOWARD THOMSON                                           
| |        |                                                          
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer
| |        |                                                          
| | Date:  | September 14, 2006                                       



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Hector Florez, * From the 142nd District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR43110.

Vs. No. 11-23-00196-CR * August 15, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

we reverse the trial court’s revocation judgment insofar as the trial court assessed 

delinquent fines, attorney’s fees, costs, and restitution against Appellant, and we 

affirm the trial court’s revocation judgment in all other respects. We remand this 

cause to the trial court for the limited purpose of performing the “ability to pay” 

inquiry and, if necessary, modifying its revocation judgment.
**Exhibit 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(No. 333-107683, No. 333-61503, No. 33-61612 and No. 333-129887) pertaining to the Sport Chalet,Inc. Employee Retirement Savings Plan and the Sport Chalet, Inc. 1992 Incentive Award Plan, and the2004 Equity Incentive Plan of our report dated May 21, 2004, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Sport Chalet, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended March 31, 2006.     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP   Los Angeles, California  June 19, 2006
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# FY 2018 Revised Allocation and Matching

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

FY 2018 revised data on the amount of funds awarded and matching requirements for 1862 and 1890 capacity grant recipients.

 

FY 2018 Revised Allocation and Matching Data(pdf - 225.86 KB)

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

funding opportunityNew Beginning for Tribal Students Program

funding opportunityResearch Facilities Act Program

funding opportunityAgriculture and Food Research Initiative - Education and Workforce Development

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

postProtecting Our Water

postNumber of AFRI FY 2024 Commodity Board Co-Funding Topics Breaks Record; Expands Focus on Nutrition 

postTropical Birds Could Tolerate Warming Better Than Expected 

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

postTropical Birds Could Tolerate Warming Better Than Expected 

postCultivating the Future: Agricultural Innovations for Climate Resilience

postNevada Researcher Aims to Improve Sorghum Hybrids for Dairy Cattle Feed
**Bureau of Land ManagementFire Vehicle/Transport/Dozer Driver Refresher Training (RT-301)**

***Driver must have a valid state driver’s license in their possession for appropriate vehicle class before operating the vehicle.***

***Type of Vehicle Used:**

A) <26,000 GVWR***(list type)***: 	

B) >26,000 GVWR/Water Tender/Transport***(list type)***: 

C) Dozer (611)

D) Super Heavy (668)
FAQ ­ CISCO PHONES AT NIFC

Q: Will my existing Headset work with the new phone?

A: Yes, existing Plantronics headsets & lifters are compatible with the new

telephones and will be transitioned during cutover weekend.

Q: Can I purchase my own Headset?

A: Yes, please contact the NIFC Help Desk (x5734) for guidance on acquiring new

Headsets. If you purchase the equipment yourself, the NIFC help desk can provide

installation assistance for supported equipment.

Q: How do I dial a 3 digit extension?

A: Dial “0” followed by the 3 digit number e.g. 0321.

Q: Are Wireless Conference Phones available?

A: Wireless conference phones are not part of the new phone system. They are an

option that can be explored after the cutover, please contact the NIFC Help Desk at that

time. x5734

Q: How do I turn my phone ringer off when the office Group Phone line rings?

A: This is a custom configuration and can be requested AFTER the migration has

completed by contacting the NIFC Help Desk and or submitting a ticket.

Q: How do I move my phone?

A: We highly recommend that you submit a ticket to the NIFC Help Desk requesting

assistance with moving your phone, especially since network services may have to

activate data jacks.

Q: Can I swap phones with my neighbor?

A: No. Contact the NIFC Help Desk if you have issues with your phone. The

information linking you and your phone are dependent on the phone model and the

MAC address of the device.

Q: Where can I find instructions for using and configuring my new phone such as

the Personal Directory and Voice Mail?

A: Documentation and instructional videos can be found on the Web at

http://www.nifc.gov/helpdesk/phones.html
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

(i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                  |  |                                                                       
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Manish Singh
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                  |  | Name: Manish Singh, Ph.D. Title: President and Chief
Executive Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2576 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Diethyl oxalate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Diethyl oxalate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIETHYL OXALATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Diethyl oxalate (CAS No. 

95–92–1) (provided for in 

subheading 2917.11.00) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2576 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.3








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)           the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  April 15, 2010                                                                      /s/ Brian W. White


Brian W. White


Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Ted Kaminer,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.



|                     |  | /s/    Ted
Kaminer*                                                                                       
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  May 23, 2003 |  | Ted Kaminer, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

---

|* |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136021 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 136021 

 COA: 273647 

Oakland CC: 2005-200425-FH 

CARLTON VIRGIL BURKS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 14, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
overhill_ex1027.htm


    Exhibit
      10.27

    


    Description
      of Employment Arrangement between Overhill Farms, Inc. and Tracy E.
      Quinn

    


    Ms.
      Quinn’s employment arrangement commenced on September 10, 2007.  The
      initial term of Ms. Quinn’s employment will be for 90 days, but reviewable by
      Overhill Farms every 30 days, and terminable at will by either
      party.   Ms. Quinn receives a monthly base salary of $30,000 per
      month.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Argued May 2, 2005 Decided May 16, 2005 Before Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge No. 04-2164 NOEL U. UDARBE, Petitioner,

v. ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Respondent

. Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals No. A38-052-399

O R D E R Noel Udarbe, a native and citizen of the Philippines, has been a lawful permanent resident of the United States since his arrival in 1982. In 2001, Udarbe pled guilty and was convicted of battery in Indiana and sentenced to one year in jail. Finding that to be a conviction for an aggravated felony, the INS charged him as removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). In the course of the removal proceedings, Udarbe admitted that he had been convicted but claimed that his conviction should not qualify as an aggravated felony. He argued that removing him under that provision violated his Fifth Amendment rights because if he had been convicted of the same crime in Illinois, the maximum sentence would have been 364 days, meaning that he would not have been convicted of a felony. The immigration judge found Udarbe removable. Udarbe appealed, again admitting his conviction and sentence but repeating his equal protection argument. The Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed Udarbe’s appeal, stating that it did not “have the authority to rule on the UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53No. 04-2164 2

constitutionality of the Act . . . .” Udarbe filed a motion to reconsider, which the Board also denied. Udarbe appeals that decision, arguing again that his constitutional rights were violated and that the Board erred in determining that it did not have the authority to rule on his constitutional claims. Unfortunately for Udarbe, we don’t have the authority to examine the merits of his constitutional argument, either. On July 19, 2004, we issued an order explaining that, because Udarbe did not file a timely petition for review of the Board’s initial decision, this appeal is limited to review of the Board’s April 6, 2004, denial of Udarbe’s motion to reconsider. In that order, the Board stated simply that Udarbe “failed to show any particular errors of fact or law in our prior decision,” noting that Udarbe instead simply repeated constitutional arguments the Board had previously considered. In this appeal, Udarbe does not dispute the Board’s contention that he failed to present any new facts or evidence in his motion for reconsideration. Therefore, we find no error in the Board’s order denying Udarbe’s motion for reconsideration. And, as we explained in our July 19 order, our review is limited to that decision, so we do not have jurisdiction to consider Udarbe’s claim that the Board erred in its initial decision not to consider Udarbe’s constitutional arguments. The petition to review the denial of the petition for reconsideration is therefore DENIED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dean Pacquette, Appellant.

Submitted August 23, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-4762

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WITHROW WILSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-96-53) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 10, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rion Brady, Archdale, North Carolina, for Appellant. Mark T. Calloway, United States Attorney, Deborah A. Ausburn, Assistant United States Attorney, Richard L. Harrison, Third-Year Law Student, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Withrow Wilson filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). In a criminal case a defendant has ten days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). The district court entered its judgment on May 5, 1997. Wilson’s notice of appeal was filed on September 16, 1997. Appellant’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of his appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.2
 Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluations; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Francisco PuñalFrancisco PuñalSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wolverine Tube, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James E.
Deason, Chief Financial Officer of Wolverine Tube, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wolverine Tube, Inc. and will be retained by Wolverine Tube, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ James E. DeasonJames E. Deason Chief Financial Officer June 15, 2007