alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

54741 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 203 

Thursday, October 22, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of October 20, 2009 

Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to the 

Situation in or in Relation to the Democratic Republic of the 

Congo 

On October 27, 2006, by Executive Order 13413, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to the situation in or in relation to 

the Democratic Republic of the Congo and, pursuant to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706), ordered related 

measures blocking the property of certain persons contributing to the conflict 

in that country. The President took this action to deal with the unusual 

and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States constituted 

by the situation in or in relation to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 

which has been marked by widespread violence and atrocities that continue 

to threaten regional stability. 

Because this situation continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared 

on October 27, 2006, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with 

that emergency, must continue in effect beyond October 27, 2009. Therefore, 

in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 

U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared 

in Executive Order 13413. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

October 20, 2009 

[FR Doc. E9–25640 

Filed 10–21–09; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PRESDOCO1OB#1.EPS</GPH>
#### In the Matter of Rosalie O. Rozanna M. et al., Appellants; Rosalie O., Respondent.

[977 NYS2d 397]

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 to appoint a guardian for the personal needs and property management of Rosalie O., an alleged incapacitated person, the petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an amended order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Nahman, J.), dated January 16, 2013, which, inter alia, after a hearing, directed the petitioner Rozanna M. to file a bond in the amount of $710,000.

Ordered that the amended order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The petitioners commenced this proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 to appoint a guardian for the personal needs and property management of Rosalie O., an alleged incapacitated person. After a hearing, the Supreme Court granted the petition, appointed the petitioner Rozanna M. as the guardian of Rosalie O.’s person and property, and appointed the petitioner Raymond M. as the stand-by guardian.

Contrary to the petitioners’ contentions, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in directing the petitioner Rozanna M. to file a bond in the amount of $710,000 in accordance with Mental Hygiene Law § 81.25, and the *942requirement that a bond be filed did not conflict with any prior orders or the supplemental needs trust created for Rosalie O. *(see*Mental Hygiene Law § 81.25).

Further, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in directing that Rosalie O.’s guardian obtain prior approval of the Supreme Court for accountant fees incurred in connection with the management of Rosalie O.’s property and that the guardian apply to the court for approval of payment of bills which may have accrued prior to the appointment of the guardian *(see*Mental Hygiene Law §§ 81.15, 81.20 [4]; 81.30; *Matter of Bertha*W., 1 AD3d 603 [2003]; *cf. Matter of William, J.J.,*32 AD3d 517 [2006]). The petitioners have not established that these directives conflicted in any way with any prior orders or the supplemental needs trust. Mastro, J.E, Roman, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of EZchip Semiconductor Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eli Fruchter, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: March 31, 2011




By: /s/ Eli Fruchter *Eli Fruchter

Principal Executive Officer  * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.





This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Appendix 7***Do What’s Right* Course Roster**Page ___ of ___

The people listed below attended this course and completed the course exercises.

Facilitated by:		Date:		Phone Number:		Location:	

If you complete the POSH Module, send a copy to your State/Center EEO Manager to receive credit for the training.

Note:	Please fax this completed form to Eileen Wallace at 208-387-5452 or email pdf to: ewallace@blm.gov and retain a copy with each employee’s training record.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         576,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 576,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          114,372
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     462,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   576,522
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               107,380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (109,058)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (109,058)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (109,058)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Michael Chenkin, Appellant, v New York City Council, Respondent.

Submitted March 28, 2011;

decided May 5, 2011

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*16 NY3d 703 (2011)].
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 1, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1650 Lower Tribunal No. 17-8022 CC

________________ 

### Andres Galindo , Appellant,
vs. 

### The Ivy Condominium Association, Inc. ,

Appellee. An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Luis Perez-Medina, Judge. Michael Bendell, P.A., and Michael S. Bendell (Boca Raton), for appellant. Vernis & Bowling of Miami, P.A., and Evelyn Greenstone Kammet and Miguel Espinosa, for appellee. Before HENDON, GORDO, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 128065(82)(83) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 128065 COA: 244277 Wayne CC: 01-004721 JEROME E. CRUTCHER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of August 30 , 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does no t appear that the order wa s entered erroneously.

d0320 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 27, 2006

Clerk
#### In the Matter of Justo Richards, Appellant, v Andrew Cuomo, New York State Attorney General, Respondent.

Submitted November 29, 2010;

decided January 18, 2011

On the Court’s own motion, appeal transferred, without costs, to the Appellate Division, Third Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]). Motion for *740leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain the motion *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Sirico, Appellant.

Submitted August 2, 2010;

decided September 23, 2010

Motion to vacate this Court’s July 15, 2010 dismissal order granted. Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert C. Mitchell, Esq., Legal Aid Society of Suffolk County, Inc., Arthur M. Cromarty Court Complex, 300 Center Drive, PO Box 1697, Riverhead, New York 11901 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
exv10w39



 





Exhibit 10.39




AMENDMENT #4




CARDTRONICS, INC.




(formerly Cardtronics Group, Inc.)




2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




I. PURPOSE




     Whereas on June 4, 2001, Cardtronics, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the CARDTRONICS GROUP, INC.
2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (the “Plan”).



     Whereas, initially the Plan provided that the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that
may be issued under the Plan shall not exceed 400,920 shares; provided, however, that the number of
shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan shall be increased automatically to
476,114 shares upon the subsequent aggregate capital contribution to the Company of $5,000,000 by
Summit Capital II, L.P., and Summit Capital Parallel II, L.P.(now known as CapStreet II, L.P., and
CapStreet Parallel II, L.P. and herein collectively called “CapStreet”), within one year of the
execution of, and in accordance with, that certain Contribution Agreement dated June 4, 2001, by
and among Summit Capital II, L.P., Summit Capital Parallel II, L.P., Card Pro, Inc., certain
Securityholders of Card Pro, Inc., and the Company;



     Whereas, heretofore the Plan has been previously amended such that the aggregate number of
shares of Common Stock that could be issued under the Plan had been increased to 750,000; and



     Whereas, during the annual meeting of the Shareholders conducted on August 22, 2007, the
Shareholders consented to increasing in the number of shares that may be issued under the Plan to
850,000.



     Now therefore, Section V(a) of the Plan is hereby amended such that nothing to the contrary in
said section and subject to adjustment in the same manner as provided in Paragraph VIII with
respect to shares of Common Stock subject to Options then outstanding, the aggregate number of
shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan shall not exceed 850,000.



Dated effective August 22, 2007.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CARDTRONICS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Michael E. Keller
 	 
	 	 	Michael E. Keller, Secretary 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 



Cardtronics, Inc.

2001 Stock Incentive Plan

Amendment #4




-1-
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) by Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(the “Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.
|   |                             |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|        | /s/ Michael D.  Price            |
|   | Michael D. Price                 |
|   | Vice President, Chief Financial  |
|   | Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |
|   | (Principal Financial Officer)    |
|   |                             |
|   |                             |
|   | August 9, 2006                   |

 

----
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 27, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00366-CR

LOYD WOODROW HAMILTON, Appellant 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court 

Galveston County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 14CR3593 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Appellant appeals his conviction for aggravated assault. Appellant’s 

appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous 

and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and 

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 

573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
2

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 60 

days have passed and no pro se response has been filed. 

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in 

the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief 

or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for 

review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Bourliot, and Zimmerer. 

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
! 3 i 4

i 6

T

TO MOTOROLA TO AUX-FM
XTS3000 RADIO CONNECTOR
GROUND | 1./-»+———_ —1_rep [A] AIRCRAFT GROUND
AUDIO HIGH | 2 | to B| PTTLOW
MIC HIGH | 3 |_ORANGE C| PTTHIGH
NOT USED | 4 | ¢—D| AUDIO Low
PTT |5 EO E| AUDIO HIGH
NOT USED | 6 aaa | F| MICLOW
‘NOT USED |7 »_|_ BLUE G| MIC HIGH @®
Grounp |g} "| H| NIC ©®00
= J} NIC ©©®
P-4 Ik} Nic
© TO ANTENNA 2 P-3
CONNECTOR (FRONT)
P-1 WICABLE: MOTOROLA o104004J26 7! Pe
P-2 & P-4; BNC MALE (AMP 225395-7)
P-3: MS3116F12-10P (M/W MS3112E12-10S) RG-174/ OR EQUIVALENT
J-1; SMA FEMALE TO BNC FEMALE (AMPHENOL 901-167-2)
LENGTH OF ADAPTER CABLE NO LESS THAN 18 INCHES. PARTS SOURCES
ea ie MOTOROLA (800) 826-1913
FOSTERS ELECTRONIC CONNECTORS CORP. (800) 742-3262
no @°0°%s° 0 0 SPACECRAFT COMPONENTS CORP. (310) 973-6400
JUMPER RESISTOR & INDUCTOR INSIDE P-1 (by Orange & Yelow wires) NEWARK ELECTRONICS (800) 463-9275
Revi] Revision rate [ote fatts [tees] |] ational interagency Fire Center OFC) Panes (00) 387-5608
pacpathr | Paatrta [etranas’ o" [twns [roe [ne
U.S.D.A ‘AUX-FM ADAPTER FOR MOTOROLA XTS3000 |
FOREST SERVICE | FS/OASA-26  [****| jy"
7 i] 8

2 3 jE EE Yee SYED (EE 6 T
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of KT Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



/s/ Chang-Gyu HwangChang-Gyu HwangChief Executive Officer


Date: April 29, 2015



/s/ Kwang Suk ShinKwang Suk ShinExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer


Date: April 29, 2015

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to KT Corporation and will be retained by KT Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 22.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
PennCorp Financial Group, Inc.:

     The audits  referred to in our report  dated March 19,  1998  included  the
related financial  statement  schedules as of December 31, 1997, and for each of
the years in the  three-year  period ended December 31, 1997,  included  herein.
These  financial  statement  schedules are the  responsibility  of the Company's
management.  Our  responsibility  is to express  an  opinion on these  financial
statement  schedules  based  on our  audits.  In  our  opinion,  such  financial
statements  taken  as a whole,  present  fairly  in all  material  respects  the
information set forth therein.

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No.  333-13285) on Form S-3 and (Nos.  333-48629,  333-48631 and  333-48637) on
Form S-8 of  PennCorp  Financial  Group,  Inc. of our  reports  included  herein
relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of PennCorp  Financial Group,  Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related  consolidated
statements of income,  changes in shareholders'  equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the  three-year  period ended December 31, 1997, and all related
schedules,  and to the reference to our firm under the heading  "Experts" in the
prospectus related to the Form S-3 registration statement.

                                                     KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP




Raleigh, North Carolina
March 27, 1998
2017 Airward, CA-CDD

• On August 12th, 2017, BLM - Apple Valley Helicopter 554 was busy assisting 

the Shasta Trinity National Forest with multiple initial attack fires, supplying 

firefighters and equipment. After landing in Hayfork to roll up the longline 

and pick up the crew, Helitack Captain Kyle Beinschroth decided to do 

one last look/walk around of the helicopter prior to departing. He 

immediately noticed that something was not right with the door on the 

tailboom of the aircraft. The pilot immediately shut down the aircraft and 

inspected the problem. It appeared that the skin on the door had 

delaminated, and after consulting with the mechanic, decided that the 

door would need replacing. Kyle’s adversity to complacency, aviator 

discipline and attention to detail helped identify a problem that could 

have led to catastrophic results. 

• Great job Kyle!

Kirk Rothwell (right), BLM National Aviation Safety Advisor, presenting Airward
2017 Airward, CA-CDD

Tail-boom door, skin delamination
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:

            (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for
      the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

      Dated: April 28, 2005                     /s/ Richard S. Wallington
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Richard S. Wallington
                                                Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-50478

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN CARLOS HERNANDEZ-GAUDILLO, also known as Juan Caudillo, 

also known as Juan Gonzales-Hernandez, also known as Juan Trejo, Jr.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:17-CR-71-1

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Carlos 

Hernandez-Gaudillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Gaudillo has filed a 

response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-50478 Document: 00514280709 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2017
No. 17-50478

2

evaluation of Hernandez-Gaudillo’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; 

we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral 

review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014); United 

States v. Corbett, 742 F.2d 173, 177 (5th Cir. 1984) (per curiam).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Hernandez-Gaudillo’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, 

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS 

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-50478 Document: 00514280709 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2017