alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Martek Biosciences
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the
date hereof:



| | a) |  | the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
October 31, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                                                                                                                                    

/s/ Henry Linsert, Jr.Henry Linsert, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Martek Biosciences
Corporation and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         412,193
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,294,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                   477,000
<INVENTORY>                                  6,212,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,192,954
<PP&E>                                       7,393,425
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,926,231
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,963,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,746,461
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,519
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,070,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,963,636
<SALES>                                     12,327,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,327,352
<CGS>                                        7,298,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,298,563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,927,911
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             102,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,449
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,449
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,449
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 

Office of Fire and Aviation 

Operations Alert 

No. 06-01 April 19, 2006 

Subject: NARROW BAND RADIO PROGRAMMING 

Area of Concern: FIRE AND AVIATION COMMUNICATIONS 

Discussion: In preparation for the 2006 Fire Season please ensure that radios in ground and aerial 

resources are correctly programmed. In most instances Federal agencies are required to utilize 

narrowband. In multi-agency situations state and local co-operators may utilize frequencies in the wide 

band mode. Correct programming of radios is a critical component of pre-season preparedness for 

handheld and vehicle radios as well as aircraft pre-use inspections. Additionally when completing pre-use 

inspections verify that aircraft radios have the Guard Frequency correctly programmed in the narrow band 

mode with tone 110.9 on the transmit side. When programming adjustments are made assure they were 

done correctly by completing radio checks. 

If you are supporting another agency, especially State or Local, validate what band they utilize. Aircraft 

and personnel have shifted back and fourth between the Texas/Oklahoma fires, as well as the Natural 

Disasters of the Southeast all fall and winter. This increases the possibility that some equipment may not 

be programmed correctly. It is suggested that adequate time be scheduled for suppression crews to verify 

their radios are programmed correctly. For aircraft pilots, managers and air crewmembers this session 

should be conducted as soon as possible after the aircraft start date. 

It is strongly recommended that all Frequency Plans and lists identify transmit and receive frequencies 

with an N or a W.

 To help personnel understand the Narrow Band issue and how it may impact their operations review 

USDI Safety Alert 05-04 http://www.oas.gov/oassafty/alerts/Alert05-04.pdf or online awareness training 

is available at http://radios.nifc.gov. The NIFC Wildland Communications web site also offers links on 

programming common aviation radios as well as links to programming portable and mobile radios. 

For additional information contact 

Joe Bates, DOI, BLM (208) 387-5879 Cell (208) 830-1634 

Sean Cross, DOI, BLM (208) 387-5444 Cell (208) 867-0285
ConcurGov 

Profile Maintenance Form

Request Type:

If transfer, from which bureau?

User Information (Name must match photo ID used at airport)

First Name: Middle Name:

Last Name: Suffix:

Employee ID: Official Email Address:

Role Information

Federal Supervisory Travel Approver

(Select if you are a Supervisor that Approves travel documents for your 

employees and/or invitational travelers)

Federal Traveler (Select if you will be a traveler and specify type to the right) Employee Invitational

Federal Travel Arranger (Select if you will be making reservations and/or preparing documents for others)

(Select if you will be included on a document routing list as a 

Reviewer [budget, auditor or certifier])

Federal Financial Travel Approver

Additional Profile Information

Traveler Geographic Location:

Organization Code:

Street Address:

Approval

Supervisor Name:

 Supervisor 

 Signature

Updates to fields 

not included on 

form below:

Home Address Information

Privacy Act Statement 

This information is requested under the authority of 5 U.S.C. Chapter 57, 31 U.S.C. 3511, 3512 and 3523, and 41 CFR 300-304, Federal Travel Regulations 

for the purpose of processing travel and travel reimbursements for individuals on official Federal Government business. The information will be used to 

facilitate travel booking services, travel authorizations, vouchers and expense reimbursements. Information may be disclosed to Department of the 

Interior officials to facilitate compliance with Federal and agency travel reporting requirements, the Department of the Treasury for payment of claims, 

commercial travel services and travel charge vendors to facilitate travel and travel claims, and other organizations as permitted under the routine uses 

identified in GSA/GOVT-4 (74 FR 26700, June 3, 2009) system of records notice, which may be viewed at https://www.doi.gov/privacy/sorn. Providing 

information is voluntary, however, not providing the requested information may delay processing of travel reservations and expense claims.

Routing List: 

State:

Street Address:

ZIP Code:

City:

Home Phone:

State:

Duty Station Information

ZIP Code:

City:

Work Phone:

Federal Auditor Other Roles:

(Select if you require read-only access to travel documents)
#### In the Matter of Kevin Thurmond, Appellant, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[976 NYS2d 750]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cahill, J.), entered May 22, 2012 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR *1235article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with engaging in lewd conduct and refusing a direct order in violation of prison disciplinary rules. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding arguing that his right to call witnesses at the hearing was denied. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and petitioner now appeals.

We affirm. Contrary to petitioner’s argument, the record confirms that the Hearing Officer made a sufficient inquiry after petitioner’s three requested inmate witnesses refused to testify at the hearing. Significantly, the Hearing Officer personally interviewed each of the inmates who refused to testify and had them execute refusal forms documenting their reasons for not wanting to be involved. Under these circumstances, we conclude that petitioner’s right to call witnesses was not denied *(see Matter of Tafari v Fischer,*98 AD3d 763, 763 [2012], *lv denied*19 NY3d 816 [2012]; *Matter of Suero v Fischer,*95 AD3d 1509, 1510 [2012]). Petitioner’s claim that Supreme Court improperly failed to find evidence of hearing officer bias is raised for the first time in his reply brief and is, therefore, not properly before us *(see Matter of Land v Fischer,*100 AD3d 1170, 1170 [2012]; *Matter of Tutunjian v Conroy,*55 AD3d 1128, 1130 n 2 [2008]). All remaining contentions advanced by petitioner have been examined and found to be unpersuasive.

Peters, EJ., Rose, Lahtinen and Egan Jr., JJ, concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60271

MARIO ALBERTO FLORES-GONZALEZ, Petitioner,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A34-609-635

-------------------- March 7, 2002 Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Mario Alberto Flores-Gonzalez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) holding that Flores-Gonzalez’s state conviction for felony driving while intoxicated was an aggravated felony warranting his removal from this country. The respondent has moved to dismiss the petition for review and to remand the case to the BIA for reconsideration in light of United States v. Chapa-Garza , 243 F.3d 921, 927 (5th Cir. 2001). Flores-Gonzalez has filed a response in which heNo. 01-60271 -2- agrees that the case should be remanded to the BIA for reconsideration in light of Chapa-Garza
. Flores-Gonzalez’s petition for review is GRANTED. The order of the BIA is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the BIA for disposition consistent with Chapa-Garza , 243 F.3d at 927. All other outstanding motions are DENIED.
Media Advisory Media Contact: Mark Gaston

 (202) 632-7003

MEDIA ADVISORY: Press Conference: Chairman Chaudhuri and Commission to 

Announce Indian Gaming’s 2017 Gross Gaming Revenues

Indian gaming continues to be a stable source of tribal economic development

WASHINGTON, D.C. June 05, 2018 – Chairman Jonodev Osceola Chaudhuri, Vice Chair Kathryn 

Isom-Clause, and Associate Commissioner Sequoyah Simermeyer of the National Indian Gaming 

Commission will hold a press conference for the media on June 26, at 1 p.m. EDT to announce the 

Indian gaming industry’s 2017 gross gaming revenues. The annual announcement is based on 

independent audit reports from 492 Indian gaming establishments operated by 246 gaming tribes, in 29 

states and is conducted in accordance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. 

WHO: NIGC Chairman Jonodev O. Chaudhuri

Vice Chair Kathryn Isom-Clause

Commissioner Sequoyah Simermeyer 

Director of Finance Yvonne Lee 

WHAT: The National Indian Gaming Commission will conduct a press conference announcing 

the 2017 gross gaming revenues of Indian gaming operations in the United States. 

WHEN: Tuesday, June 26, 2018, 1 p.m. EDT.

ACCESS In person attendance: 90 K Street NE, Suite 200, Washington, D.C. 20002

OPTIONS: Adobe Connect: Click on this link to access: 

https://nigc.adobeconnect.com/rlgphxrqjy4e/

Phone Call In: 888-795-2173

Participants passcode: 3743026

NOTE: Media wishing to attend in person MUST RSVP by Wednesday, June 20 by 

4:30 PM EDT to Mark Gaston at Mark_Gaston@nigc.gov or 202-632-7003. 

Press Credentials-Press badges must be worn at all times.
NOTE: News release, charts, and graphics can be found at http://www.nigc.gov/publicaffairs/conference-presentations immediately following the press conference. Media 

unable to call-in can view the press conference on the NIGC website after 1 p.m. EDT. 

To learn more, visit www.nigc.gov and follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

###

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act created the National Indian Gaming Commission to support tribal self-sufficiency and the integrity of 

Indian gaming. The NIGC has developed four initiatives to support its mission including (1) To protect against anything that amounts to 

gamesmanship on the backs of tribes; (2) To stay ahead of the Technology Curve; (3) Rural outreach; and (4) To maintain a strong 

workforce within NIGC and with its tribal regulatory partners. NIGC oversees the efficient regulation of 506 gaming establishments 

operated by 244 tribes across 29 states. The Commission’s dedication to compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act ensures the 

integrity of the growing $31.2 billion Indian gaming industry. To learn more, visit www.nigc.gov and follow us on Facebook and Twitter
#### CASE v. MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE CORP. et al.

No. 356.

District Court, W. D. Missouri, C. D.

June 8, 1948.

See, also, 78 F.Supp. 776.

Thomas C. Swanson, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Thomas J. Layson, of Trenton, Mo., and Patterson, Chastain, Cowherd & Smith, of Kansas City, Mo., for defendants.

REEVES, District Judge.

The corporate defendant has filed its motion for a bill of particulars and in said motion sets forth the particular averments of the complaint which it is sought to have particularized. Numerous authorities are cited in support of said motion.

Prior to the recent amendment to paragraph (e) of Rule 12, Rules of Civil Procedure in the Federal Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the courts had practically nullified the provision for a bill of particulars. Because of this fact an amendment to said paragraph (e) was adopted by the Supreme Court on December 27, 1946, and submitted to Congress January 3, 1947. It has become effective conformable to Rule 86 of said Rules of Civil Procedure in the Federal Courts. By this amendment the motion for a bill of particulars has been eliminated from said rules. It is deemed sufficient for either party to obtain the same information under the discovery rules. These include Rules 26, 30, 31, and particularly Rule 33, entitled “Interrogatories to Parties.” Moreover, by the pretrial procedure provided by Rule 16, either party may secure all of the information contemplated in a motion for a bill of particulars.

Since said motion for a bill of particulars has been deleted or stricken from the rules, it is proper for the court to overrule said motion, and leave the defendants to their remedy under the several discovery rules above mentioned. It will be so ordered.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# Time and Date:

12:15 p.m., Wednesday, June 3, 2009.

# Place:

1325 G Street, NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.

# Status:

Open.

# Contact Person for More Information:

                        Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate Secretary; (202) 220-2376;                         *ehall@nw.org.*

# Agenda:

 

I. Call To Order.

II. Approval of the Minutes.

III. Summary Report of the Audit Committee.

IV. Summary Report of the Corporate Administration Committee.

V. Summary Report of the Finance, Budget and Program Committee.

VI. Board Appointments.

VII. Financial Report.

VIII. Corporate Scorecard.

IX. Chief Executive Officer's Quarterly Management Report.

X. Adjournment.

Erica Hall,

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-13140 Filed 6-2-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-P
#### In the Matter of Injah Tafari, Appellant, v Lucien J. LeClaire, as Acting Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

Submitted February 14, 2011;

decided March 31, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Surface Coatings, Inc. Exhibit 10.1






EXHIBIT 10.1










Letterhead
















CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




We consent to the use of our reports dated August 10, 2007 on the financial statements of Surface Coatings, Inc. as of April 30, 2007, December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the period from July 19, 2005 (Date of Inception) through December 31, 2005, the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 and the four months ended April 30, 2007, and the inclusion of our name under the heading “Experts” in the Form SB-1 Registration Statement filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission.










/s/ David S. Hall, P.C.




David S. Hall, P.C.

Dallas, Texas










December 7, 2007
Document

Third Amendment to Dispensing Agreement


This Third Amendment to the July 26, 2018 Dispensing Agreement (“Agreement”) between Vericel Corporation (“Vericel” or “Client’) and AllCare Plus Pharmacy LLC (“AllCare”) shall be effective as of May 16, 2022 (“Effective Date”).


Recitals 
WHEREAS, Vericel and AllCare are Parties to the Agreement; 
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideration, the Parties hereby agree to modify the Agreement as follows


1.The Parties agree to replace Section 7., Term, in its entirety with the following: “7. Term. The term of this Agreement shall continue through May 31, 2024 (“Term”), unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the Dispensing Agreement.”


2.The Parties agree that all other conditions of the Agreement shall remain in force and that such terms shall prevail on the event of a conflict with this Third Amendment


3.The Parties agree to modify Exhibit A- Payment Terms and Pricing from the Dispensing Agreement. The fees outlined in Exhibit A attached to this Amendment reflect fees for the period May 16, 2022 through May 31, 2024.
































































Exhibit A 
Vericel MACI Program


Fees:
AllCare’s fees for the Services outlined in this Amendment are as follows:





Invoicing Schedule
AllCare will invoice Client as follows:


Fixed Fees:
Client will be invoiced quarterly in advance on the first month and day of each quarter (pro-rated as applicated) for all fixed fees during the Term.


Variable, Transactional, Pass-Through Costs and Out of Pocket Expenses:
Client will be invoiced monthly, in arrears, based on Services performed (actuals) during the Term.


Payment Terms:
Payable within thirty (30) days from date of invoice.


Client shall also reimburse AllCare for reasonable travel and other out of pocket expenses incurred in connection with the provision of services, without premium or mark up, provided, however, that such expenses are itemized and at the Client’s request.


















































IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment, by their duly authorized representatives, as of the Effective Date.








																								
	VERICEL CORPORATION  			ALLCARE PLUS PHARMACY LLC
	By:	Joe Mara CFO				By:	Aren Leighton	
	Name:	Joe Mara				Name:	Aren Leighton	
	Title:	CFO				Title:	GM & Lead	
	Date:	5/13/2022				Date:	May 13, 0222
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Lavi A. Lev, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Credence Systems Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|      |  | /s/LAVI A. LEVLavi A. LevPresident and Chief Executive Officer | 
|----- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: |  | January 17, 2008                                               | 

---



QuickLinks