alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements. (in thousands except earnings per share)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,777
<SECURITIES>                                     8,387
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,114
<PP&E>                                           1,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                     174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,129
<BONDS>                                            478
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          7
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,323
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,403
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  82
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,622)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,622)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,622)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.13)


</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CURTIS L. THOMAS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 251

[ August 5, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Laura Johnson , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 501983CF003464A

.

Curtis L. Thomas, Doral, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Duckett v. State , 148 So. 3d 1163 (Fla. 201 4 )

.

G ROSS

, C IKLIN and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        34,645,050
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   2,215,058
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              39,341,504
<CASH>                                         486,674
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         719,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,084,356
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             20,839,109
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          2,524,222
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         3,339
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,538,915
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,084,356
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,155,411
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            605,601
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              82,892
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                   1,374,887
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    329,383
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           186,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (46,688)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (41,173)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,515)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,515)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              18,279,962
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          1,374,887
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               2,211
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               688,592
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             18,964,046
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.2

THIRD AMENDMENT TO INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANCY
AGREEMENT

This Third Amendment to the Independent Contractor Consultancy Agreement
(the “Consultancy Agreement”) is made and entered into effective September 1,
2007, by and between Ross Stores, Inc. (the “Company”) and Stuart G. Moldaw (the
“Consultant”). The Company and the Consultant previously entered into an
Independent Contractor Consultancy Agreement (the “Consultancy Agreement”),
which became effective April 1, 2002; a First Amendment to the Consultancy
Agreement effective August 21, 2003; and a Second Amendment to the Consultancy
Agreement effective April 1, 2005 (the Consultancy Agreement, First Amendment to
the Consultancy Agreement, and Second Amendment to the Consultancy Agreement are
collectively the “Agreement”). It is now the intention of the Company and the
Contractor to further amend the Agreement as set forth
below:

		I.		The term of this Agreement shall be extended
      through March 31, 2011.
		 
		II.		The Consultant and the Company further amend the
      Agreement by deleting Paragraph 1.2(d) of the Agreement in its entirety
      and replacing it with the following new Paragraph
      1.2(d):
		 
		 		1.2(d)
		 
	     	 	     	(i) Until the respective deaths of Consultant and
      his current spouse, Consultant, and his current spouse, shall be entitled
      to continue to participate (at no cost to them) in the following Company
      employee benefit plans: executive medical, dental, and vision. The Company
      shall not make any changes in such plans or arrangements that would
      adversely affect Consultant’s rights or benefits thereunder, unless such
      change occurs pursuant to a program applicable to all senior executives of
      the Company and does not result in a proportionately greater reduction in
      the rights of, or benefits to, Consultant as compared with any other
      senior executive of the Company.


Except for the amendments as set forth above, the Agreement and all of
its terms remain in force and effect.


	     	    	     	ROSS STORES, INC. 		STUART G. MOLDAW 
				  (the “Company”) 	 	     (“Consultant”) 
					 			
				By: 	 		By: 	  
					 		 	 
				Name: 	 	 	Date: 	  
					 			
				Title: 	 			 
					 			
				Date: 	 		 	 





26
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2935 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2935

      To clarify that the revocation of an alien's visa or other 
            documentation is not subject to judicial review.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 20, 2010

Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, and Mr. Roberts) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To clarify that the revocation of an alien's visa or other 
            documentation is not subject to judicial review.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF VISA REVOCATION.

    Section 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1201(i)) is amended by striking ``There shall be no means of judicial 
review'' and all that follows and inserting the following: 
``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including section 2241 of 
title 28, United States Code, any other habeas corpus provision, and 
sections 1361 and 1651 of such title, a revocation under this 
subsection may not be reviewed by any court, and no court shall have 
jurisdiction to hear any claim arising from, or any challenge to, such 
a revocation.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall--
            (1) take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act; 
        and
            (2) apply to all visas issued before, on, or after such 
        date.
                                 <all>
```
No. 957.

#### Dobrusky *v.*Nebraska.

March 30, 1942.

*Mr. Bernard M. Spencer*for petitioner. *Messrs. Walter R. Johnson,*Attorney General of Nebraska, and *Clarence S. Beck,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nebraska denied.
#### Jose Angel GUTIERREZ; Maria Dolores Gutierrez; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-71971.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 13, 2009.*

Filed April 29, 2009.

Before: GRABER, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Angel Gutierrez, Maria Dolores Gutierrez, and four of their children, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Perez v. Mukasey,*516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ fifth motion to reopen. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(A); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (an alien who is subject to a final order of removal is usually limited to filing one motion to reopen removal proceedings).

To the extent petitioners challenge the BIA’s January 11, 2005 order dismissing their underlying appeal, we lack jurisdiction because this petition is not timely as to that order. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); *Singh v. INS,*315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”) by Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(the “Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 
|   | /s/ Michael D. Price                                                                                            |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Michael D. Price                                                                                                |
|   | Vice President, Chief Financial  Officer, Treasurer and Secretary  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|   |                                                                                                            |
|   | May 10, 2004                                                                                                    |

 

----
RESOURCE ORDER 2. INCIDENT/PROJECT NAME 3. INCIDENT/PROJECT ORDER NUMBER INCIDENT FINANCIAL CODE

12.

Request 

Number

Ordered 

Date/ 

Time

To/From

Q 

T 

Y 

RESOURCE REQUESTED

Needed Deliver 

To

To

Time Agency 

ID RESOURCE ASSIGNED

Date/Time

RELEASED

From Date To
2. INCIDENT/PROJECT NAME 3. INCIDENT/PROJECT ORDER NUMBER INCIDENT FINANCIAL CODE

PAGE 

OF 

DATE / TIME TO / FROM DOCUMENTATION
|Exhibit 23.2
        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-107683, No. 333-61503 and No. 33-61612) pertaining to the Sport Chalet, Inc. Employee Retirement Savings Plan and the Sport Chalet, Inc. 1992 Incentive Award Plan of our report dated May 21, 2004, except for Note 2 as to which the date is May 19, 2005, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Sport Chalet, Inc. for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2005.
        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
        Los Angeles, CaliforniaJune 28, 2005
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|72
|--
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 22-0005 

IN RE THE MOTION OF PAMELA R. ABELLA 

FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE 

OF MONTANA 

FILED 

FEB 01 2022 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montana 

ORDER 

Pamela R. Abella has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of Montana 

pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions 

Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on 

Character and Fitness has certified that Abella has provided the necessary documentation 

and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. 

Abella has also requested, pursuant to Rule X, Rules of Admission, permission to 

be sworn in remotely, if possible, due to the COVID 19 pandemic. Good cause appearing: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Pamela R. Abella may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of 

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk 

of the Montana Supreme Court, which office will address the process of remote swearing. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this , —day of February, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

02/01/2022

Case Number: PR 22-0005
J

• Justices
NWCG#007-2011 

IFPM Currency Requirements Page 1 of 2 

 MEMORANDUM

Reference: NWCG#007-2011 

To: NWCG Executive Board 

 NWCG Committee Chairs 

Geographic Area Coordinating Group (GACG) Chairs 

From: NWCG Chair 

Date: June 13, 2011 

Subject: Interagency Fire Program Management (IFPM) Currency Requirements 

The Interagency Fire Program Management (IFPM) Standard identifies currency as a 

requirement for certain IFPM positions. The original intent of the Task Group that 

developed the IFPM Standard was to document that currency was defined as “current and

qualified” (i.e. “red card” qualified). However, it has since been clarified per Office of 

Personnel Management (OPM) standards, that currency cannot be used as a selective factor 

because it does not meet the OPM’s definition of a selective factor 

(http://www.opm.gov/qualifications/policy/ApplicationOfStds-06.asp). 

Therefore, NWCG is providing the following guidance to the federal bureaus on hiring 

procedures associated with IFPM positions. These guidelines have been developed by 

NWCG’s Operations and Workforce Development Committee’s IFPM subcommittee, 

comprised of wildland fire and Human Resources (HR) subject matter experts. The 

following points are intended to provide clarification for Human Resources (HR) and Fire 

Management regarding the term “currency”: 

1. “Currency” will now be defined pursuant to the Wildland Fire Qualification System 

Guide (PMS 310-1). 

2. Federal bureaus cannot use “currency” to screen out applicants. As long as 

applicants can produce documentation that they have obtained the IFPM 

competencies at some point (as validated by the Incident Qualifications and 

Currency System (IQCS) Master Record or equivalent documentation), they will 

meet the IFPM Selective Factors. 

NATIONAL WILDFIRE 

COORDINATING GROUP

National Interagency Fire Center 

3833 S. Development Avenue 

Boise, Idaho 83705 
NWCG#007-2011 

IFPM Currency Requirements Page 2 of 2 

3. The hiring official can use “currency” as justification for selection. However, for 

Delegated Examining advertisements, currency cannot be a reason to pass over a 

person who is a qualifying veteran. 

4. As indicated in the IFPM Standard, certain positions still require the employee to 

remain current and qualified (i.e. “red card” qualified). If an applicant is selected less 

“currency”, or an incumbent loses “currency”, the employee and management must 

develop a plan for regaining currency. 

Federal bureaus should ensure distribution of this memorandum to their HR and wildland 

fire staff. Questions regarding this new interpretation of the IFPM standard should be 

directed to your agency’s IFPM contact. 

cc: NWCG Program Management Unit 

 NWCG Budget Advisory Unit Chair 

 IFPM Subcommittee Chair 

 National IC/AC Council Chair
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

David Anthony Caserta, Appellant

No. 06-13-00025-CR v.

State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of 

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 24754). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, David Anthony Caserta, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 24, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 99.1




              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") by Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.




                                               /s/ James R. Murphy
                                              ------------------------------
                                              James R. Murphy
                                              Chairman, President and Chief
                                              Executive Officer
                                              (Chief executive officer)

                                              May 13, 2003


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO BENTLEY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY BENTLEY
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                 5
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       5
<PP&E>                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         5
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  61,960
<BONDS>                                0
<COMMON>                               97,660
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                            (159,615)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           5
<SALES>                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       0
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          5
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (5)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (5)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                          (5)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          00
<EPS-DILUTED>                          00
        

</TABLE>
No. 948.

#### Marine Harbor Properties, Inc. *v.*Manufacturers Trust Co. (successor to Mortgage Corporation of New York), Trustee, et al.

March 16, 1942.

*Mr. Arthur E. Friedland*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Fahy*and *Messrs. Richard H. Demuth, Chester T. Lane, Martin Riger,*and *Homer Kripke*for the Securities & Exchange Commission; *Mr. Harold L. Smith*for the Manufacturers Trust Co., Trustee; and *Mr. Harold Stern*for Mortimer Rubenstein, Foreclosure Receiver, respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.