alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from SEC filing Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         $15,709
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,352
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,791
<INVENTORY>                                     13,957
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,988
<PP&E>                                         547,660
<DEPRECIATION>                                  196,507
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  882,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            77,104
<BONDS>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            299
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                      457,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    882,607
<SALES>                                         380,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                380,407
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   339,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4,315
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  41,566
<INCOME-TAX>                                     17,944
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              23,622
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     23,622
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.79
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000332

19-MAY-2017

07:58 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,028
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (625)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,794
<PP&E>                                          48,228
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,036)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,088
<BONDS>                                        163,606
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            8,385
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           168
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,818)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,436
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,451
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (57,670)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8,829)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,048)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,048)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,048)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.07)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.41

2001 HOME OFFICE INCENTIVE PLAN

Purpose:To reward Home Office management for accomplishments resulting in targeted year-end profit for the
Company.

Eligibility:Officers and Department Managers designated as Directors of the Company who are actively employed by Fresh
Choice on January 1, 2001. Those hired after January 1, 2001 may participate at a pro-rated amount unless other arrangements have been made. Participants must be employed by
Fresh Choice, Inc. on the date final incentive pay calculations are completed; incentive pay is not earned until that date. Participants are only eligible to receive incentive pay if the
Company achieves 90% or more of Plan. See attached schedule. The 2001 targets include the expense of this program.

Plan Year:The plan begins on January 1, 2001 and ends on December 30, 2001.

Incentive Pay Available:The incentive pay available is a percentage of the participant's base salary as of
January 1, 2001 at Plan plus 20% of before tax earnings above plan. The pool is allocated among the designated participants based on a predetermined percentage amount. See attached schedule.
Actual bonus paid is interpolated according to actual results.

Distribution of Incentive Pay:Incentive pay will be paid as soon as practical after year end financials are audited
and provided that the Company met or exceeded defined levels of performance.

Plan Intent:Fresh Choice intends to maintain the plan under the terms listed above. However, Fresh Choice reserves the
right to modify or terminate the plan at any time.

---

QuickLinks
NATIONAL INTERAGENCY FIRE CENTER 

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

CASUAL PAYMENT CENTER

2020 Annual Report

A Service First Organization

The principal mission of the CASUAL PAYMENT CENTER (CPC) is the delivery of excellent customer 

service in the cost effective and prompt processing of payment of casual/AD hires for the Bureau of Indian 

Affairs (BIA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the National Park Service (NPS), and the Fish and 

Wildlife Service (FWS).

Pine Gulch Fire—Colorado 2020
ANNUAL REPORT

2020 Calendar Year Payroll Statistics

Firefighters standing in a foggy mist during a morning briefing on the Holiday Farm Fire in Oregon, 2020. 

(Photo by Megan McGinnis)
2020 - Total Number of Days at Each National Preparedness Level

PL Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total

1 31 29 31 30 31 1 1 0 0 0 21 31 205

2 0 0 0 0 0 13 13 0 0 2 9 0 24

3 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 3 0 16 0 0 66

4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 12 0 0 26

5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 30 1 0 0 45

Total 31 29 31 30 31 30 30 31 30 31 30 31 366
DOI FIVE YEAR AVERAGE

2016-2020

2020 Highlights:

• Casual Payment Center’s payroll process changed to an electronic process 

vs. a paper process due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This change resulted in 

the ability to work remotely to meet safety measures implemented during 

this time.

• Forest Service began uploading DOI e-ISuite timesheets from Type I and 

Type II incidents into the Federal Personnel Payroll System (FPPS). The 

reintroduction of e-ISuite timesheets provides efficiencies by eliminating 

the need for time and attendance to be manually entered, therefore resulting 

in a cost saving time efficiency.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF WOLVERINE TUBE, INC. FOR THE SIX
MONTH PERIOD ENDED JULY 4, 1998 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF
WOLVERINE TUBE, INC. AT JULY 4, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                          12,293
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,840<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     85,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,831
<PP&E>                                         187,728<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 472,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,676
<BONDS>                                        127,315
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                     253,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   472,945
<SALES>                                        339,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               339,939
<CGS>                                          289,479
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  289,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,984
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,788
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,688
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,445
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,243
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55
<FN>
<F1>THE VALUES FOR THE TAGS RECEIVABLES AND PP&E ARE SHOWN NET OF THEIR
RESPECTIVE ALLOWANCE ACCOUNTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2020

b0921 

# Order

Clerk September 29, 2020

159455

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159455

COA: 347273

Wayne CC: 02

- 011393

- FC

TYRONE MAURICE SMITH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2019

order of the Court of Appeals is co nsidered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Optical Molecular Imaging, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

(i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 1, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ David Wohlberg
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | David Wohlberg                       
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | President and Chief Operating Officer
Nos. 921 and 922.

#### Black Diamond Lines, Inc. *v.*United States Navigation Co., Inc.

March 9, 1942.

*Mr. John W. Crandall*for petitioner. *Mr. John Tilney Carpenter*for respondent.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
No. 813.

#### Skidmore *v.*United States.

February 16, 1942.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Murphy and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
No. 907.

#### Citizens National Bank *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

March 30, 1942.

Petition for *823writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

*Mr. James W. Broaddus*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark,*and *Messrs. J. Louis Monarch*and *F. E. Youngman*for respondent.
#### Virgil Smith, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Derek Smith, a Minor, Respondent, v Hazel E. Sherwood et al., Defendants, and Central New York Regional Transportation Authority, Also Known as Centro, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Submitted December 6, 2010;

decided December 14, 2010

Motion by New York Public Transit Association for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Kevin White, Respondent.

[963 NYS2d 360]

Appeals by the People (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), dated January 13, 2012, which, after a hearing, granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court dated March 15, 2012, as denied that branch of their motion which was to reopen the suppression hearing and, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination granting that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated January 13, 2012, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by so much of the order dated March 15, 2012, as was made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated March 15, 2012, is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

Contrary to the People’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of their motion which was to reopen the suppression hearing to introduce certain audio recordings into evidence. Here, the record of the suppression hearing clearly demonstrates that both parties raised arguments solely with respect to the issue of the credibility of a police officer who testified that he personally observed a gun in the defendant’s possession at the scene. The Supreme Court resolved that credibility issue in favor of the defendant, and we discern no basis for disturbing that determination based on the record before us. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in refusing to reopen the suppression hearing so that the People could present additional evidence in support of an alternative theory for upholding the legality of the seizure of the gun *(see People v Cordes,*270 AD2d 430, 430 [2000]; *People v Chetrick,*255 AD2d 392 [1998]; *People v Lopez,*235 AD2d 496 [1997]; *Foley v Roche,*68 AD2d 558, 567 [1979]). Moreover, upon reargument, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its original determination granting that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress the gun.

Mastro, J.P, Austin, Cohen and Miller, JJ, concur.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaire Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randy Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Randy Jones
 Randy Jones
 Chief Financial Officer/ Consultant
 August 20, 2004
Exhibit 99.3



Independent Accountants' Report on Applying Agreed Upon Procedures



The Board of Directors
Prime Receivables Corporation:



We have applied certain agreed-upon procedures, as discussed below, to the accounting records of Prime Receivables Corporation ("Prime"), a wholly-owned special-purpose finance subsidiary of Federated Department Stores, Inc. ("Federated"), relating to the servicing procedures performed by FDS Bank, as Servicer, under the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated December 15, 1992 between Prime, as Transferor, Federated and JPMorgan Chase Bank, successor to Chemical Bank, as Trustee, on behalf of the Certificateholders of Prime Credit Card Master Trust and under the Assumption Agreement dated September 15, 1993 between Prime, Federated, FDS Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, successor to Chemical Bank. Prime's management is responsible for the monthly certificates prepared by the Servicer. This agreed-upon procedures engagement was performed in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The sufficiency of these procedures is solely the responsibility of the specified users of the report. Consequently, we make no representations regarding the sufficiency of the procedures described below either for the purpose for which this report has been requested or for any other purpose. Our procedures and findings are as follows:

- In accordance with section 3.06(b) of the Agreement, we recalculated or compared each amount set forth in items (i) through (xvii) of each monthly certificate prepared by the Servicer, pursuant to section 3.04(c) of the Agreement, during the period from February 2, 2002 to February 1, 2003, (the "Certificates") from information in the Transferor's computer generated Daily Cash Allocation Reports, the Agreement, the Series 1992-3 Supplement to the Agreement dated December 31, 1992, the Series 1995-1 Supplement to the Agreement dated July 27, 1995, or the Series 2000-1 Supplement to the Agreement dated December 7, 2000, as appropriate. We found such recalculated or compared amounts to be in agreement with the amounts set forth in items (i) through (xvii) of the Certificates. Such recalculated or compared amounts are deemed to be in agreement if any differences noted are immaterial.

We were not engaged to, and did not conduct an examination, the objective of which would be the expression of an opinion on the Certificates. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Had we performed additional procedures, other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you.

This report is intended solely for your information and is not intended to be and should not be referred to or distributed for any purpose to anyone other than JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Corporation, as the Rating Agencies, Investor Certificateholders or the management of Prime.



KPMG LLP



Cincinnati, Ohio
April 22, 2003
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the twelve-month period ended April 3, 2011 of Sport Chalet, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.







Date:  June 7, 2011
By:
/s/ CRAIG L. LEVRAChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President




Date:  June 7, 2011
By:
/s/ HOWARD K. KAMINSKYExecutive Vice President-Finance,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sport Chalet, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                  SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company as of March 31, 1999:

NAME                                                   PLACE OF ORGANIZATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Subsidiaries of Micro Warehouse, Inc. (Delaware):
-------------------------------------------------
Micro Warehouse Inc. of New Jersey                         United States
Micro Warehouse Inc. of Ohio                               United States
SaveByNet.com, Inc.                                        United States
Micro Warehouse International, Inc.                        United States
Micro Warehouse Canada Limited                             Canada
Benton Sistemas SA de CV                                   Mexico
Micro Warehouse Australia Pty. Ltd.                        Australia
Online Interactive Inc.                                    United States
Auto Register Inc.                                         United States
Micro Warehouse Switzerland AG                             Switzerland
Innosoft SARL                                              France
Kelar SARL                                                 France
Inmac Spa                                                  Italy
Micro Warehouse Holding BV                                 Netherlands
Computer Resources International Svenska AB                Sweden


Subsidiaries of Micro Warehouse International Inc.:
---------------------------------------------------
Micro Warehouse Japan, KK                                  Japan


Subsidiaries of Micro Warehouse Holding BV:
-------------------------------------------
TD SA                                                      France
Micro Warehouse SARL                                       France
Micro Warehouse BV                                         Netherlands
Inmac AB                                                   Sweden
Micro Warehouse (Deutschland) GmbH                         Germany
Micro Warehouse Ltd.                                       United Kingdom


Subsidiaries of Micro Warehouse Ltd.:
-------------------------------------
Inmac Ltd.                                                 United Kingdom
Micro Warehouse (1996) Ltd.                                United Kingdom


Subsidiaries of Micro Warehouse (1996) Ltd.:
--------------------------------------------
Technomatic Ltd.                                           United Kingdom


Subsidiaries of Inmac AB:
-------------------------
Micro Warehouse Sweden AB                                  Sweden


Subsidiaries of Micro Warehouse Sweden AB:
------------------------------------------
MacKatalogen AB                                            Sweden