alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          61,418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,263,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                    35,647
<INVENTORY>                                  2,368,694
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,511,962
<PP&E>                                       2,043,867
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,108,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,164,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,878,123
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,463,387
<OTHER-SE>                                     646,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,164,259
<SALES>                                     20,567,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,570,821
<CGS>                                       15,944,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,070,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                61,245
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             139,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                361,183
<INCOME-TAX>                                   154,154
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            207,029
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   207,029
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
NPX136D-070 Operation Supplem

Channel Na

Channel Number 

Channel Frequency

Frequency Type

T: Transmit

R: Receive

Sx:: Simplex

 Radio Tone Status

= : Per channel- : Tx Only 

 [Blank] : Tones Off

1: Power On/Off 

Rotate MN knob past detent cw/ccw. 

2: Display Layout (Normal Operating M

003=AIR TAT:166.6750 

Toggle the DISP +/- Switch to view receiv3: Modes of Operation

The SCAN / NORM / GD TX switch on thcontrols the operating modes of the radioswitch in the center position. All operation assumes the radio is in normal operating editing menu press Esc until normal oper

4: Display Illumination Level

Press Menu, Settings Menu? is displa

Press Enter, DsplBrt Lt<Off/On>:XX

Press the ▲ / ▼ arrow buttons to change 

Press Esc, Save Settings? is displaye

5: Scroll Channels Up/Down
NPX136D-070 Operation Supplem

8: Radio TX Mode for Direct / Repeater Press Me

n

u, Settings 

Menu? is displ

a

Press Enter, then press Menu until Tx 

Mod

Press the

▲ / ▼ arrow buttons to sele

ct S

Dir

ect op

eration is si

mplex, repeat

er ope

Press Es

c, Save Settings? is displaye

9: Edit a Tone

Select the channel to edit. Press Me

n

u until Channel Menu? is dis

Press Enter, Edit

Main? is displayed. 

Press Enter, then pr

ess 

M

e

n

u until Rx T

Press the

▲ / ▼ arrow buttons to sele

ct 

Press Me

n

u, Rx Tone: XXXX is display

Press the 

▲ / 

▼ arrow buttons to select t

Press Me

n

u, Tx Tn Type:XXXX is disp

Press the

▲ / ▼ arrow buttons to sele

ct 

Press Me

n

u, Tx Tone:XXXX is displaye

Press the

▲ / ▼ arr

ow buttons to sel

ect t

Press Es

c, Save Changes? is display

e

10: Radio Transmit Power selection: H

Press Me

n

u until Settings Menu? is di

Press Enter. 

Press Me

n

u until Tx Pwr:XXXX is displ

a

Press the

▲ / ▼ arrow buttons to sele

ct H

Press Es

c, Save Settings? is displaye

11: Channel Transmit Power selection

Note: Available only when the radio tran
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2874 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2000 Louisiana Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Roy 

Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 11, 2009 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2000 Louisiana Avenue in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Roy Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROY RONDENO, SR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 2000 Louisiana Avenue in New 

6 Orleans, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Roy Rondeno, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2874 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Roy Rondeno, Sr. 

3 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Patricia Bischoff, Respondent, v Alexander Hoffman et al., Appellants.

[976 NYS2d 406]

*660In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death, the defendants Alexander Hoffman and Health Check Medical Center appeal, and the defendants Joshua Pollack and Adhinayak Sharma each separately appeal, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bunyan, J.), dated February 8, 2012, as denied their respective motions pursuant to CPLR 3216, in effect, to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them for failure to prosecute.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendant Adhinayak Sharma is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to perfect the appeal in accordance with the rules of this Court *{see*22 NYCRR 670.8 [c], [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the defendants Alexander Hoffman and Health Check Medical Center, and the defendant Joshua Pollack; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff, payable by the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

After the plaintiff failed *to*comply with the 90-day notices of the defendants Alexander Hoffman and Health Check Medical Center, and the defendant Joshua Pollock (hereinafter collectively the movants), they moved pursuant to CPLR 3216, in effect, to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them for failure to prosecute. In response to the motions, the plaintiff, to avoid dismissal, was required to demonstrate a justifiable excuse for the delay as well as a potentially meritorious cause of action *(see*CPLR 3216 [e]; *Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co.,*89 NY2d 499, 503 [1997]; *Furrukh v Forest Hills Hosp.,*107 AD3d 668 [2013]; *Jedraszak v County of Westchester,*102 AD3d 924 [2013]; *Byers v Winthrop Univ. Hosp.,*100 AD3d 817 [2012] ). The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the court’s discretion *(see Santiago v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*10 AD3d 393, 394 [2004]).

Here, it was not an improvident exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court to accept law office failure as an excuse for failing to timely file the note of issue *(see*CPLR 2005; *Las Palmeras De Ossining Rest., Inc. v Midway Ctr. Corp.,*107 AD3d 853 [2013] ; *Byers v Winthrop Univ. Hosp.,*100 AD3d 817 [2012]). Further, the affidavit of the plaintiff’s medical expert was sufficient to establish the potentially meritorious nature of the plaintiffs claim. Although the affidavit of merit was filed after the movants had filed their respective reply papers, the plaintiff had permission to do so, and the movants had the opportunity to respond thereto and submitted papers in response. Accordingly, the affidavit of merit was properly considered *(see Hanscom v Goldman,*109 AD3d 964 [2013]).

*661The movants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.E, Balkin, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 

**- 1391** 

MAGDALINE IYABO BANYONG

,

Petitioner

,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

A ppeals.

Submitted : November 22, 2010 Decided: December 9, 2010

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kim

- Bun Thomas Li, LI, LATSEY & GUITERMAN, PLLC, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitio ner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jem C. Sponzo, Office of Immigration Litigation

, U NITED S TATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE

, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precede nt in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Magdaline Iyabo Banyong, a native and citizen of

Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reconsider.

We have reviewed the administrative record and fi nd no abuse of

discretion in the denial of relief on Banyong’s motion. See 8

C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2010). We accordingly deny the petition for

review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Banyong

(B.I.A. Mar. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral arg ument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7350

VICTOR COLLYN GREENE,

Plaintiff - Appellant

versus

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL

SERVICES; EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION;

EARL BESHEARS, Warden, in his official

capacity as Warden of Eastern Correctional

Institution; MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL PRE-RELEASE

SYSTEM; WARDEN CORCORAN, in his official

capacity as Warden of Maryland Correctional

Pre-Release System; RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Correction,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-97-1901-JFM)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Victor Collyn Greene, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court's

orders dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West

Supp. 1997), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find that

this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Greene v. Department of Public

Safety, No. CA-97-1901-JFM (D. Md. July 21 & Aug. 22, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Agriculture published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of May 28, 2009, concerning a request for comments on the information collection “Special Use Administration” OMB control number 0596-0082. The document contained incorrect burden hours. The total burden hours should be 161,365 not 247,107 as published.                    

Charlene Parker,

Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-13048 Filed 6-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER 18 U.S.C. 1350
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Credence Systems Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 3,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lavi A. Lev, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to and for the purposes of 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge:



|Date: |  | January 17, 2008                                               | 
|----- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|      |  | /s/LAVI A. LEVLavi A. LevPresident and Chief Executive Officer | 

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Infinity Energy Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/
    Stanton E. Ross    | 
|-------------------------- | 
|Stanton E. Ross            | 
|Chief Executive Officer    | 
|September 27, 2012         | 
|                           | 
|/s/ Daniel
    F. Hutchins | 
|Daniel F. Hutchins         | 
|Chief Financial Officer    | 
|September 27, 2012         |
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Analysts International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe year ended January 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), the undersigned, Michael J. Lavelle, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, and David J. Steichen, Interim Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  March  18, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Michael J. LaVelle                |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Michael J. LaVelle                    |
|                         |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |   |                                  |
|                         |   |                                  |
|                         | By:    | /s/ David J. Steichen                 |
|                         |   | David J. Steichen                     |
|                         |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer       |

 

1

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40709

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HUGO ESPINOZA-GONZALEZ, also known as Joel Albert Espinoza,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-217-1

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hugo EspinozaGonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Espinoza-Gonzalez has filed a response. The record

is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of EspinozaGonzalez’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally

“cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 16, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40709 Document: 00511510762 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2011
No. 10-40709

the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits

of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.

2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We have reviewed

counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well

as Espinoza-Gonzalez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-40709 Document: 00511510762 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2011
# STEP SMS

&P	

# Risk Assessment Matrix
-  Home 
        -  Health Information 
        -  For Health Professionals 
        -  Diabetes Discoveries & Practice Blog 
        -  Archive Results 

Diabetes Discoveries & Practice Blog

## Archive Results

                Results 1 - 2 of 2 for:                     **December 2021**

## 2021 Year in Review

Dec. 15, 20210 Comments

            Check out the top posts of 2021, plus three interesting posts you may have missed.            Read more

## What Can You Do to Improve the Oral Health of Your Patients with Diabetes?

Dec. 8, 20210 Comments
              - Complications of Diabetes
              - Practice Transformation

            Learn why it’s so important for health care professionals to pay attention to the oral health of their patients with diabetes.            Read more

## Blog Tools

### Subscribe

Subscribe to get blog updates.

### Share this page

FacebookXEmailWhatsAppLinkedInRedditPinterest

### Search

### About

**Diabetes Discoveries and Practice Blog**

### Tags

Patient Communication64

Research Advancements45

Complications of Diabetes35

Medication and Monitoring29

Practice Transformation25

Diabetes Prevention24

Patient Self-Management22

Obesity and Weight Management20

Social Determinants of Health19

New Technologies17

Diabetic Kidney Disease15

Type 1 Diabetes15

Nutrition12

Shared Decision-Making12

Community Health8

### Archive

April 20241

March 20241

Feb. 20241

Jan. 20241

Dec. 20231

Nov. 20231

Oct. 20231

Aug. 20231

July 20231

June 20232

May 20231

April 20231

March 20231

Feb. 20231

Jan. 20232

Dec. 20221

Nov. 20222

Oct. 20222

Sept. 20222

Aug. 20223

July 20222

June 20222

May 20222

April 20222

March 20222

Feb. 20222

Jan. 20222

Dec. 20212

Nov. 20211

Oct. 20212

Sept. 20212

Aug. 20212

July 20212

June 20213

May 20212

April 20212

March 20212

Feb. 20212

Jan. 20211

Dec. 20202

Nov. 20202

Oct. 20204

Sept. 20205

Aug. 20204

July 20203

June 20202

May 20202

April 20201

March 20202

Feb. 20203

Jan. 20202

Dec. 20193

Nov. 20192

Oct. 20192

Sept. 20193

Aug. 20193

July 20193

June 20192

May 20194

April 20192

March 20192

Feb. 20191

Jan. 20192

Dec. 20182

Nov. 20184

Oct. 20184

Sept. 20182

Aug. 20185

July 20183

June 20184

May 20185

April 20184

March 20183

Feb. 20184

Jan. 20183

Dec. 20173

Nov. 20174

Oct. 20172

Sept. 20174

### Disclaimer

We welcome comments; all comments must follow our comment policy.

Blog posts written by individuals from outside the government may be owned by the writer and graphics may be owned by their creator. In such cases, it is necessary to contact the writer, artist, or publisher to obtain permission for reuse.