alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Drill #10

&"Times New Roman,Bold"Helitack/Initial Attack		&"Times New Roman,Bold"Drill #10

&P	

&P	

# Code Page

# image1.png
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1992-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         145,778
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               263,603
<PP&E>                                         5,329,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,571,984)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,021,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22,260
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     999,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,021,479
<SALES>                                        215,312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,722
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  107,082<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,383
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            9,383
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   9,383
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0

<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation and
amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and interest expense.
</FN>


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Grants 
-  Programs 
-  4-H and Positive Youth Development 
-  4-H Learning 

# 4-H Civic Engagement

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

              -  4-H and Positive Youth Development                   -  4-H Team 
                -  4-H National Headquarters 
                -  National 4-H Conference 
                -  Communities Support Military Families Curriculum 
                -  4-H Program Quality And Accountability                    -  4-H Name And Emblem 
                -  4-H Access, Equity And Opportunity                    -  Children, Youth And Families At Risk (CYFAR) 
                  -  CYFAR Grant Application Resources And Information 
                  -  CYFAR Grantee Resources 
                  -  Vulnerable Populations 
                  -  Military Youth Programs 
                -  4-H Learning                    -  4-H Civic Engagement 
                  -  4-H Health And Well-Being 
                  -  4-H Science 
                -  4-H Professional And Volunteer Development                    -  Young Adults 
                -  4-H And PYD Partnerships                    -  Formal PYD Partnerships 
                  -  Informal PYD Partnerships 
                  -  PYD Inter-Agency Working Groups/White House Initiatives 

4-H Civic Engagement is the knowledge, skills, attitudes and motivation that give youth the capacity to move beyond one’s individual self-interest and to be committed to the well-being of some larger group. 

4‐H Civic Engagement programs empower young people to be well-informed citizens who are actively engaged in their communities and the world.

 

Youth make a positive difference by engaging in learning opportunities that give them a heightened sense of responsibility and capacity to connect as active members of their communities, nation and world.**Civic Engagement**
                  - Community Engagement
                  - Civil Education
                  - Service
                  - Personal Development

 

4-H Headquarters

National 4-H Conference

Human Sciences

Youth
#### KURT M. JACHMANN CO., Inc., Plaintiff, v. HARTLEY, COOPER & CO., Ltd., Harold B. Hill, George de H. Vaizey and Bevington, Vaizey *&*Foster, Ltd., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

Jan. 10, 1955.

See also D. C., 16 F.R.D. 565, 17 F.R.D. 263.

Joseph S. Meadow, M. K. and R. Josephson, New York City, for plaintiff.

Webster, Sheffield & Chrystie, Mendes & Mount, New York City, for defendants.

PALMIERI, District Judge.

This motion is made by a witness under Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The witness seeks to be relieved from compliance with those parts of a subpoena duces tecum which require him to produce an agency agreement with Lloyd’s of London, and correspondence with and reports to Mendes & Mount, Esqs., concerning a claim made by Nour Trading Company (Nour).

During argument on the motion this Court examined the agreement, relieved *317the witness from the necessity of producing that portion of it that the witness had not produced before, and directed that it be placed in a sealed envelope in the custody of the Clerk of the Court and held subject to the Court’s order. Thus, the only question now before me relates to the correspondence with and reports to Mendes & Mount, Esqs., concerning the Nour claim. The witness objected to producing these documents because of its belief that they were privileged communications between an attorney and it as an agent for the attorney’s client in connection with a suit instituted by Nour on certificates of cargo insurance for losses and damages that is now pending before this Court. The witness stated that it feared that any information obtained by the plaintiff in the instant case might be communicated to Nour for use in its case.

It is not necessary for me to determine whether the witness could refuse to produce the requested documents in the case instituted by Nour. In this case, I believe that it must do so under certain safeguards which will be stated later. The witness admits that it is regularly engaged in the business of holding surveys of damaged cargo which result in reports similar to those made in the Nour matter. It does not claim that the documents asked for are irrelevant to this case. Indeed, it produced claim files involving other matters in accordance with the request of the same subpoena to which it objects. Under these circumstances it should produce the requested documents, but the order that it produce the documents should contain adequate safeguards which will insure that the reports and correspondence will not be disclosed to third persons who may use them in connection with the pending case instituted by Nour.

The requests for allowances of counsel fees under Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are denied.

Settle order on notice.
#### Maria Calderon, Appellant, v Evergreen Owners, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 24, 2011;

decided March 29, 2011

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*14 NY3d 708 (2010)].
NWCG Fire Training and Incident Qualifications

Employee Name:

IFPM Position:   National Fire Program Manager

NWCG Incident Management Qualifications

Primary Core Requirement: Task Force Leader (TFLD)

Secondary Core Requirement: Incident Commander, Type 3 (ICT3) OR Type 2 

Command and General Staff Position OR Prescribe Fire Burn Boss, Type 2 (RXB2) 

The purpose of this form is to help identify required and developmental training for the 

NWCG Incident Management Qualification Standards for this position.  The required 

training includes the IFPM “Additional Required Training” and the required training for 

the Incident Command Positions (ICS) and/or the Wildland Fire Positions based on the 

2009 Wildland Fire Qualification System Guide (PMS 310‐1).  Employees should refer

to individual agency requirements.

Course

Number

Course Name Training  

Needed

Training

Completed

Estimated

Cost

Required Training     

S‐215  Fire Operations in the 

Wildland/Urban Interface 

    

S‐300  Extended Attack Incident 

Commander 

    

S‐330  Task Force/Strike Team Leader        

S‐390  Introduction to Wildland Fire 

Behavior Calculations 

    

S‐420  Command and General Staff       

RX‐301  Prescribed Fire Implementation       

RX‐341  Prescribed Fire Plan Preparation       

M‐581 or 

LFML or 

FML 

Fire Program Management or 

Local Fire Management Leadership 

Fire Management Leadership 

    

Suggested Developmental Training     

L‐480  Organizational Leadership in the 

Wildland Fire Service 

    

L‐580  Leadership is Action       

S‐491  Intermediate National Fire Danger 

Rating System     

S‐482  Advanced Fire Management 

Applications 

RX‐310  Introduction to Fire Effects       

M‐480  Multi‐Agency Coordinating (MAC) 

Group 

    
 NWCG Fire Training and Incident Qualifications

Employee Name:

IFPM Position:   National Fire Program Manager

M‐580  Fire in Ecosystem Management 

ICS‐300  Intermediate ICS 

ICS‐400  Advanced ICS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,669
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,579
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        89,165
<OTHER-SE>                                   (132,075)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,669
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,538)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10QSB FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,636
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (590)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,555
<PP&E>                                          39,743
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,758)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,438
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,011
<BONDS>                                        147,212
<COMMON>                                           145
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,708
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,438
<SALES>                                         55,379
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,379
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   457
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (7,780)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,452)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,452)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,452)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. NEIL LANCHANTIN, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-04-436 DECISION

On April 29, 2010, the defendant was sentenced to five (5) years in the Montana State Prison, for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence, for the offense of Driving a Motor Vehicle Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs, a felony.

On August 5,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Connor Murphy. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 5 th day of August, 2010.

DATED this 13th day of August, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, John B. Wood, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telos Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) forthe registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and to the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

39
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 55258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--DVD Copy Control Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 4, 2009, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), DVD Copy Control 
Association (``DVD CCA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, China Hualu Group, Ltd., Dalian, People's 
Republic of China; JVC Kenwood Holdings, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan; and 
SIIX Corp., Osaka, Japan have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, A&A Stamper House, Inc., Baldwin Park, CA; Evatone, Inc., 
Clearwater, FL; Kat Digital Corp., Taipei, Taiwan; Kenwood Corporation, 
Tokyo, Japan; Polar Frog Digital, Scottsdale, AZ; Sea Star Technology 
(Hong Kong) Company Ltd., Hong Kong, Hong Kong-China; Shenzhen Sea Star 
Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, People's Republic of China; Soaring 
Technology Co., Ltd., Taipei-Hsien, Taiwan; Victor Company of Japan, 
Limited, Kanagawa, Japan; and Zentek Technology Japan, Inc., Tokyo, 
Japan have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and DVD CCA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 5, 
2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009 (74 FR 34364).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-25626 Filed 10-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Martha Munasca, Appellant, v Morrison Management LLC et al., Respondents.

[975 NYS2d 402]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J), entered August 22, 2012, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

Defendants failed to establish entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff alleges that she was injured when she tripped and fell on a sidewalk defect in front of premises owned and operated by defendants. The pictures submitted by defendants in support of their motion do not unequivocally demonstrate that the complained-of defect is trivial as a matter of law since its size is not discernable and the photos appear to show that the defect has an edge, which could constitute a tripping hazard *(see Abreu v New York City Hous. Auth.,*61 AD3d 420 [1st Dept 2009]). There is also no evidence showing the defect’s dimensions at the time of the accident *(see Valentin v Columbia Univ.,*89 AD3d 502, 503 [1st Dept 2011]).

Defendants’ reliance on plaintiff’s testimony that the height difference between the sidewalk flags at the time of her accident was approximately one inch, is insufficient to satisfy their prima facie burden, since the testimony was at best an estimate of the actual size of the defect, and was not based on an actual measurement *(cf. Vazquez v JRG Realty Corp.,*81 *565AD3d 555 [1st Dept 2011]). Furthermore, plaintiffs deposition testimony suggesting that, because “there were a lot of people at the bus stop” at the time of the accident, it was difficult to detect the defect, raises factual questions requiring a trial *(see Argenio v Metropolitan Transp. Auth.,*277 AD2d 165, 166 [1st Dept 2000]).

Defendants’ argument that they were not responsible for the defect either because it was “patchwork” around a lamppost, or because it was at a bus stop is unavailing. The photographs in the record do not appear to depict patchwork for which the City might be responsible *(see*Administrative Code of City of NY § 19-152 [a]), and defendants submitted no evidence to establish that the area was a designated bus stop maintained by the City *(cf. Phillips v Atlantic-Hudson, Inc.,*105 AD3d 639 [1st Dept 2013]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Acosta, Moskowitz, ManzanetDaniels and Gische, JJ.