alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2906 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to modify a provision 

relating to leases involving certain Indian tribes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 2906 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. LEASES INVOLVING CERTAIN INDIAN TRIBES. 

2 The first section of the Act of August 9, 1955 (25 

3 U.S.C. 415), is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (a), in the second sentence, by 

5 inserting ‘‘and land held in trust for the Kalispel 

6 Tribe of Indians, the Puyallup Tribe of Indians,’’ 

7 after ‘‘the Kalispel Indian Reservation’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘, the Puy9 allup Tribe of Indians, the Swinomish Indian Tribal 

10 Community, or the Kalispel Tribe of Indians’’ after 

11 ‘‘Tulalip Tribes’’. 

Passed the Senate September 22, 2010. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2****Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification**I, Gino Chouinard, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HearUSA, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:August 13, 2007/s/Gino Chouinard
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 273 Referred in House (RFH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 273

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2009

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To require the designation of the federally occupied building located 
at McKinley Avenue and Third Street, S.W., Canton, Ohio, as the ``Ralph 
            Regula Federal Office Building and Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RALPH REGULA FEDERAL OFFICE BUILDING AND COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Administrator of General Services shall 
ensure that the federally occupied building located at McKinley Avenue 
and Third Street, S.W., Canton, Ohio, is known and designated as the 
``Ralph Regula Federal Office Building and Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--During the period in which the building referred 
to in subsection (a) is federally occupied, any reference in a law, 
map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States 
to that building shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ralph 
Regula Federal Office Building and Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate January 15, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
No. —, original.

#### DeWindt et al. *v.*South Carolina.

March 30, 1942.

The motion for leave to file a petition is denied.
# Skill #4

&"Times New Roman,Bold"Belt Weather Kit		&"Times New Roman,Bold"Skill #4

&P	

&P	

# Code Page

# image1.png
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of March
31, 2009 and for the periods then ended.
 /s/    Gregory T. RoyalGregory T. RoyalChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2614 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain printed golf umbrellas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain printed golf 

umbrellas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN GOLF UMBRELLAS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.66.01 Umbrellas, each having an 

arc greater than 165 cm, 

with a printed or imprinted 

canopy (provided for in subheading 6601.99.00) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2614 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
# FLOOD

Your home has been flooded.  Although floodwaters may be down in some areas, many dangers still exist.   Here are things to remember in the days ahead.

· Roads may be closed because they have been damaged or are covered by water.  Barricades have been place for your protection.  If you come upon a barricade or a flooded road, go another way.

· Keep listening to the radio for news about what to do, where to go, or places to avoid.

· Emergency workers will be assisting people in flooded areas.  You can help them by staying off the roads and out of the way.

· If you must walk or drive in areas that have been flooded:

· Stay on firm ground.  Moving water only 6 inches deep can sweep you off your feet.  Standing water may be electrically charged from underground or downed power lines.

· Flooding may have caused familiar places to change.  Floodwaters often erode roads and walkways.  Flood debris may hide animals and b broken bottles, and it’s also very slippery.  Avoid walking or driving through it.

· Play it safe.  Additional flooding or flash floods can occur.  Listen to local warnings and information.  If your car stalls in rapidly rising water, get out immediately and climb to higher ground.

# Staying Healthy

A flood can cause emotional and physical stress. 

Rest often and eat well

Keep a manageable schedule.  Make a list of jobs and do one at a time.

Discuss your concerns with others and seek help.

# Cleaning Up and Repairing Your Home

Turn off the electricity at the main breaker or fuse box, even if power is off in your community.  That way, you can decide when your home is dry enough to turn it back
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       9,571,990
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      66,299,085
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,365,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 33,252,959
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       3,488,772
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         3,417,013
<LOANS>                                     63,492,512
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,275,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             125,636,446
<DEPOSITS>                                 100,278,080
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,652,140
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,341,666
<LONG-TERM>                                 11,137,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,090,859
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,136,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             125,636,446
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,575,388
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              634,780
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,111
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,211,279
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             556,472
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             737,254
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,474,025
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   15,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,396,028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                523,440
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     523,440
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   328,798
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.36
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,425,365
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,399,614
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,277,141
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   22,028
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,965
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,275,078
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,275,078
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6620

ANTONIO COX, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Virginia Department of Corrections, Director; MARGRET BOWLES, TPS; SHAWN MEEKS; DAVE SMITH, Warden, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-246-R) Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998)complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cox v. Angelone , No. CA-98-246-R (W.D. Va. April 22, 1998). Appellant’s motions for appointment of counsel, production of documents, and to file an amended complaint, are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 11

     NET INCOME PER SHARE

     The Company has adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
     Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share (SFAS 128), effective with the year
     ended June 30, 1998.  SFAS 128 requires the presentation of basic and
     diluted net income per share.  Basic net income per share is computed by
     dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average
     number of common shares outstanding for that period.  Diluted net income
     per share is computed giving effect to all dilutive potential common shares
     that were outstanding during the period.  Dilutive potential common shares
     consist of incremental common shares issuable upon exercise of stock
     options and warrants for all periods.  All prior period net income
     per-share amounts have been restated to comply with SFAS 128.

     In accordance with the disclosure requirements of SFAS 128, a
     reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted net
     income per share is provided as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

     Years ended June 30,                     1998           1997           1996
     --------------------                     ----           ----           ----
     <S>                                   <C>            <C>            <C>
     Basic and diluted net income
          (numerator)                      $4,264,341     $3,909,954     $2,471,835
     Shares used in basic net income
          per-share calcuations
          (denominator)
     Weighted average shares of
          common stock outstanding          4,564,355      4,658,796      3,769,859

     Shares used in diluted net income
          per-share calculations
          (denominator)
     Weighted average shares of
          common stock outstanding          4,564,355      4,658,796      3,769,859
     Dilutive effect of stock options          28,396         30,917      3,787,257
                                           ----------     ----------      ---------
                                            4,592,751      4,627,879      3,787,257
                                           ----------     ----------     ----------

     Basic net income per share            $      .93     $      .84     $      .66
     Diluted net income per share          $      .93     $      .84     $      .65
</TABLE>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
    <meta name="robots" content="noindex">
    <title>Freedom of Information Act - NIDDK</title>
    
<meta name="VIcurrentDateTime" content="638490787245731868" />
<meta name="VirtualFolder" content="/" />
<script type="text/javascript" src="/layouts/system/VisitorIdentification.js"></script>

</head>
<body>
    <div></div>
</body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the twelve-month period ended March 28, 2010 of Sport Chalet, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.





Date:  June 18, 2010
By:
/s/   Craig L. LevraChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President/s/   Howard K. KaminskyExecutive Vice President-Finance,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sport Chalet, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

We have issued our reportsdated March 8, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial statements andmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting included in the Annual Report of Warren Resources, Inc. andSubsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in theRegistration Statements of Warren Resources, Inc. on Form S-3(File No. 333-130109, effective December 2, 2005) and on Form S-8(File No. 333-125277, effective May 26, 2005).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Oklahoma City, OklahomaMarch 8, 2006

----
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

Assigned on Briefs June 23, 2005

IN RE M.W.M., W.W.M., S.M.M., & A.M.M. 

 Appeal from the Chancery Court for Lawrence County

No. 11033-02 Tim Hamilton, Judge

No. M2005-00053-COA-R3-PT - Filed August 1, 2005

WILLIAM B. CAIN, J., concurring.

The evidence in this case, both as to termination of parental rights and to the best interest of

the children, indicates that termination of parental rights would survive even the ultimate standard

of “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

I adhere to my longstanding disagreement with the majority in its assertion that:

The heightened burden of proof mandated by Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-

113(c)(1) requires us to adapt Tenn. R. App. P. 13(d)’s customary standard of review

for cases of this sort. First, we must review the trial court’s specific findings of fact

de novo in accordance with Tenn.R.App. P. 13 (d). Thus, each of the trial court’s

specific factual findings will be presumed to be correct unless the evidence

preponderates otherwise. Second, we must determine whether the facts, either as

found by the trial court or as supported by the preponderance of the evidence, clearly

and convincingly establish the elements required to terminate a biological parent’s

parental rights. Jones v. Garrett, 92 S.W.3d at 838; In re Valentine, 79 S.W.3d at

548-49; In re S.M., 149 S.W.3d at 640; In re M.J.B., 140 S.W.3d at 654.9

These decisions draw a distinction between specific facts and the combined weight of these facts. 9

Tenn.R.App.P. 13(d) requires us to defer to the trial court’s specific findings of fact as long as they

are supported by a preponderance of the evidence. However, we are the ones who must then

determine whether the combined weight of these facts provides clear and convincing evidence

supporting the trial court’s ultimate factual conclusion. The Tennessee Supreme Court used this

approach in In re Valentine when it recognized the difference between the conclusion that a biological

parent had not complied substantially with her obligations in a permanency plan and the facts relied

upon by the trial court to support this conclusion. In re Valentine, 79 S.W.3d at 548-49; see also

Jones v. Garrett, 92 S.W.3d at 838-39.

This effort to separate “clear and convincing evidence” as a standard for the initial trier of

fact from “clear and convincing evidence” in applying the properstandard of appellate review is like
-2-

trying to separate the inseparable. The “clear and convincing evidence” standard is the same both

at the trial level and at the appellate level, and likewise at both levels, a “preponderance of the

evidence” standard and a “clear and convincing evidence” standard are totally incompatible. The

reasons supporting my view are set forth at length in Estate of Acuff v. O’Linger, 56 S.W.3d 527,

535-37 (Tenn.Ct.App.2001) and In re Z.J.S. and M.J.P., No. M2002-02235-COA-R3-JV

(Tenn.Ct.App.2003).

Since under any standard of review termination of parental rights in this case is unassailable,

I concur in the judgment.

___________________________________ 

WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE
**Aviation Base ReviewChecklist #08**

**Aviation Base ReviewChecklist #08**

**8-1Revised 2014**

**8-7Revised 2014**
# BLM EU Helicopter Data

BLM Exclusive Use Helicopter Annual Data Draft 2017	

BLM Exclusive Use Helicopter Annual Data Draft 2017	

# Personnel

# FOG Core Data
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Written Statement of Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the Quarter Ended March
31, 2006 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Garrett E. PierceGarrett E. PierceVice Chairman and Chief Financial OfficerDecember 7, 2006
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of American Israeli
Paper Mills Limited (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Yaki Yerushalmi, Active Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.

Date: June 24, 2004                               /s/ Yaki Yerushalmi
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  Yaki Yerushalmi
                                                  Active Chief Executive Officer