alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                             298
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   298
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          183,086
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       285,165
<OTHER-SE>                                   (467,953)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       298
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,747
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,747)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,747)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<S>                              <C>              <C>           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR             YEAR          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997      DEC-31-1996   DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1997      DEC-31-1996   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                58,051           32,234        81,614
<SECURITIES>                          20,817           20,022        20,580
<RECEIVABLES>                        217,475          203,687       172,275
<ALLOWANCES>                          13,339           10,876         7,808
<INVENTORY>                          170,543          201,119       143,941
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     533,004          494,828       468,262
<PP&E>                                32,416           29,712        32,175
<DEPRECIATION>                        48,727           39,482        32,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       619,344          607,842       554,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                270,477          223,298       169,419
<BONDS>                                   78              376        20,458
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0                0             0
<PREFERRED>                                0                0             0
<COMMON>                                 346              343           339
<OTHER-SE>                           348,443          383,825       364,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         619,344          607,842       554,546
<SALES>                            2,125,698        1,916,244     1,684,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   2,125,698        1,916,244     1,684,627
<CGS>                              1,773,722        1,573,798     1,360,636
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      1,773,722        1,573,798     1,360,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     305,903          277,192       226,276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0                0             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1,769            2,209         4,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (37,816)          36,601        57,903
<INCOME-TAX>                          (1,135)          19,719        22,659
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (36,681)          16,882        35,244
<DISCONTINUED>                             0                0             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0            1,584             0
<CHANGES>                                  0                0             0
<NET-INCOME>                         (36,681)          15,298        35,244
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (1.06)            0.45          1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (1.06)            0.44          1.05


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1

                     Wellsford Residential Property Trust
                     ------------------------------------
                                 Subsidiaries

Wellsford Warwick Corporation
Wellsford Ironwood Corporation
Wellsford Marks B Corporation
Wellsford San Tropez Corporation
WOP Limited Partnership
Wellsford Oklahoma, Incorporated
Wellsford Holly Residential Properties, Incorporated
Wellsford Property Management, Corporation
Holly Property Holdings, Incorporated
Wellsford Development Corporation
Wellsford Bear Creek II Corporation
Wellsford Holly Management, Incorporated
Village at Bear Creek L.L.C.
Park at Highlands L.L.C.
Wellsford Park Highlands Corporation
Palomino Park Public Improvements Corporation
Wellsford Marks West Corp.
Red Canyon at Palomino Park L.L.C.
Wellsford Real Properties, Inc.
Wellsford Chatham Corp.
Wellsford Wayne Corp.
North American Medical Research Corp.
#### PIASCIK v. TRADER NAVIGATION CO., Limited.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Oct. 9, 1946.

Jacob Rassner, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Reid, Cunningham & Freehill, of New York City, for defendant.

RIFKIND, District Judge.

Defendant moves for an order setting aside the service of the summons and complaint on the ground, first, that the defendant is a foreign corporation which is not engaged in doing business in this district and, secondly, on the ground that the summons and complaint were not delivered to a person authorized by the Rules to receive it.

Since the motion must be granted upon the second ground, it is unnecessary to pass upon the first.

*119Assuming, arguendo, that the defendant was doing business in the district and that the British Ministry of War Transport was its agent, proper service has not been •effected. T. Ashley Sparks, one of the two ■persons to whom the summons was delivered, according to his affidavit, which is ■not contradicted, was no longer connected with the British Ministry at the time of the attempted service. Specifically, it appears from his affidavit that he had resigned his post as representative in the "United States for the British Ministry of War Transport on October 22, 1945 and that his resignation was promptly accepted. The summons and complaint were left with him on the 16th of May, 1946. Windnauer, the second person with whom the •summons and complaint were left, appears •to have been manager of the Marine ■Claims Division of the British Ministry of War Transport. He was not authorized by "his employers, nor by the defendant, to re•ceive service of process. There is nothing •in plaintiff’s affidavit to suggest that he is ■one of the class of persons authorized by Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to receive service in behalf of a foreign corporation.

Motion granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FRESH
CHOICE, INC.'S REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                           1,830
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      126
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,100
<PP&E>                                          44,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,435)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,301
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,175
<COMMON>                                        42,210
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,439)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,205
<SALES>                                         73,887
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,887
<CGS>                                           19,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,710<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,443)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,443)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.13)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.13)
<FN>
<F1>RESTRUCTURING AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT EXPENSES
<F2>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Aviation Base ReviewChecklist #08**

**Aviation Base ReviewChecklist #08**

**8-1Revised 2010**

**8-2Revised 2010**
#### Supriya KATYAL, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73715.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 6, 2006.*

Filed Nov. 14, 2006.

Richard E. Oriakhi, Esq., Roman & Singh, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Brian W. Enos, Esq., USF-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Respondent.

Before: LEAVY, McKEOWN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Supriya Katyal, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision that affirmed the ruling of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying her application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

‘Where, as here, the BIA reviews de novo the IJ’s decision, our review is limited to the decision of the BIA.” *Garcia-Quintero v. Gonzales,*455 F.3d 1006, 1011 (9th Cir.2006). We review for substantial evidence the BIA’s decision, *Gu v. Gonzales,*454 F.3d 1014, 1018 (9th Cir.2006), and we grant the petition and remand.

The BIA found that Katyal’s experiences did not rise to the level of persecution. We disagree. Katyal’s father was arrested and beaten severely on two occasions, one of which resulted in a two-week hospitalization. In addition, during the arrest of Katyal and her mother, the police sexually harassed Katyal, raped her mother, and threatened Katyal herself with rape. Because the cumulative effects of the harm rise to the level of persecution, we conclude that substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s finding. *See Ndom*
      *662
      *v. Ashcroft,*384 F.3d 743, 751 (9th Cir. 2004) (holding that “cumulative effect of harms that might not individually amount to persecution may support an asylum claim”); *see also Mashiri v. Ashcroft,*383 F.3d 1112, 1120 (9th Cir.2004) (holding that emotional and psychological trauma, as well as harm to family members, can rise to the level of persecution). Accordingly, we grant the petition for review.

Because the BIA did not determine whether there was a nexus between the harm Katyal suffered and one of the five statutorily protected grounds, we remand to the BIA in order to allow the agency to rule on this issue in the first instance, and to consider whether Katyal is eligible for asylum and withholding of removal. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED and REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Grants 
-  Programs 

# Farm Financial Management

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

              -  Farm Financial Management 

Each year, hundreds of U.S. farm businesses fail; some caused by poor financial management. NIFA provides funding opportunities and staff expertise to address these concerns, allowing producers to meet their business and financial goals successfully.

Farm management involves successfully integrating the factors of production land, labor, and financial resources to realize an economically viable, ecologically sound, and socially responsible farm business.

Brent Elrod

Risk Management Education Centers

Northeast Center for Risk Management Education, University of Delaware

Southern Region Risk Management Education Center, Texas Cooperative Extension

Support for Farm and Ranch Management Education, NFRBMEA

Western Center for Risk Management Education, Washington State University

Farmer Education
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        33,646,350
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   8,234,414
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              41,880,764
<CASH>                                       2,099,492
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         689,911
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,316,676
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             22,916,206
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          2,420,740
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         3,328
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,645,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,316,676
<PREMIUMS>                                   3,056,891
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          1,084,356
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             306,195
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                   3,667,981
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    867,658
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           449,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (537,908)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (299,769)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (238,139)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (238,139)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              19,763,111
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          3,667,981
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              25,156
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             1,525,995
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             21,879,941
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2544 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2544

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men's wading boots, valued 
   over $30/pair, with textile outer soles and uppers of leather or 
 composition leather whose height from the bottom of the outer sole to 
       the top of the upper does not exceed 9 inches (22.86 cm).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men's wading boots, valued 
   over $30/pair, with textile outer soles and uppers of leather or 
 composition leather whose height from the bottom of the outer sole to 
       the top of the upper does not exceed 9 inches (22.86 cm).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN'S WADING BOOTS, VALUED OVER $30/PAIR, WITH 
              TEXTILE OUTER SOLES AND UPPERS OF LEATHER OR COMPOSITION 
              LEATHER WHOSE HEIGHT FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE OUTER SOLE TO 
              THE TOP OF THE UPPER DOES NOT EXCEED 9 INCHES (22.86 CM).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Men's wading        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        boots, valued                                                      31/2011.......
                        over $30/pair,
                        with textile
                        outer soles and
                        uppers of leather
                        or composition
                        leather whose
                        height from the
                        bottom of the
                        outer sole to the
                        top of the upper
                        does not exceed 9
                        inches (22.86 cm)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        6405.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 15

November 7, 2000

Shoreline Financial Corporation
Benton Harbor, Michigan

We have reviewed, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the unaudited interim financial information of Shoreline Financial Corporation for the periods ended September 30,
2000 and 1999 as indicated in our report dated November 7, 2000.  Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.  We are aware that our report referred to above, which was included in your quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
is being incorporated by reference in Registration Statements (File Nos. 33-29052, 33-10629 and 33-09819) on Form S-8 and in the Registration Statement (File No. 33-34008) on Form S-3. In addition, we are aware that our report referred to above, which was
included in your quarterly report on Form 10-Q is being incorporated by reference in the Chemical Financial Corporation Registration Statement (File No. 33-48832) on Form S-4.

We also are aware that our report referred to above, under Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by
an accountant within the meaning of Section 7 and 11 of the Act.

Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
For Release: August 3, 2023 Contact: Stanton Florea, 208-387-5437 

stanton.florea@usda.gov

 

Military aircraft equipped with Modular Airborne Firefighting Systems (MAFFS) 

mobilized to assist with wildfire suppression efforts

Boise, Idaho – The USDA Forest Service is activating two Department of Defense C-130 aircraft 

equipped with MAFFS to assist with increased fire activity in several western states. The aircraft, from 

the 153rd Airlift Wing, Wyoming Air National Guard, from Cheyenne, Wyoming, and the 302nd Airlift 

Wing, Air Force Reserve Command, Peterson Space Force Base, Colorado, will join the USDA Forest 

Service and other state and federal agencies fighting wildfires across the west. The two aircraft are 

available from the Klamath Falls Airtanker Base in Klamath Falls, Oregon, beginning today. 

Having military C-130s that can be converted into airtankers provides a critical “surge” capability that can 

be used to bolster wildfire suppression efforts when commercial airtankers are fully committed or not 

readily available.

The C-130 aircraft are equipped with the U.S. Forest Service’s MAFFS, which can drop up to 3,000 

gallons of fire retardant in less than 10 seconds across a quarter-mile line. The system slides into the back 

of the military aircraft, and retardant is released through a nozzle on the rear left side. In addition to the 

153rd and 302nd Airlift Wings, the 146th Airlift Wing, California Air National Guard, and the 152nd 

Airlift Wing, Nevada Air National Guard are also part of the national MAFFS program, which includes a 

total of eight C-130 aircraft.

On July 21, the National Wildland Fire Preparedness Level was elevated to 3 (out of 5), reflecting 

increased wildland fire activity across the U.S. The level was raised by the National Multi-Agency 

Coordination Group, composed of wildland fire representatives from each wildland fire agency based at 

the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) in Boise, Idaho.

For more information on MAFFS, visit: https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/fire/planes/maffs.

For photos and videos of the MAFFS program, visit: www.dvidshub.net/feature/MAFFSAEG.

###

The National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC), located in Boise, Idaho, is the nation's support center for wildland

firefighting. Nine different agencies and organizations are part of NIFC including, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of

Land Management, Department of Defense, U.S. Fire Administration, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, USDA Forest

Service, National Association of State Foresters, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,

and the National Park Service.