alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 22-40489 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Kimberly Knebel Janise, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:21-CR-21-1 

______________________________ 

Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kimberly Knebel 

Janise has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Janise has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

January 11, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 22-40489 Document: 00516606175 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2023
No. 22-40489 

2 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 22-40489 Document: 00516606175 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2023
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Patrick W. Hurley, Chief Financial Officer ofSport-Haley, Inc., certify that:

 

1.       Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sport-Haley, Inc.;

 

2.       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: September 28, 2007 |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|                     |
| /s/ PATRICK W. HURLEY    |   |
| Patrick W. Hurley        |
| Chief Financial Officer  |

 

----
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2697 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acid Blue 80. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acid Blue 

80. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACID BLUE 80. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.49 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Acid Blue 80) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2697 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of YBCC, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2018 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xiuhua Song, Chief Finanial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Xiuhua Song

Xiuhua Song

Chief Financial Officer

 

Dated:  May 15, 2018
**Justification for Exception Position 4 (level AD-I) hired under the DOI AD Hiring Authority**

*Exception Position 4 requires skills acquired through specific job training, technical education or experience and requires the ability to apply or use specialized, complicated techniques or equipment.  The incumbent of this position is expected to instruct others in the requirements of the job, plan work or supervise positions at the next lower level.  This level requires independent judgement and decision making.  Accomplishing assignments and resolving problems/issues are expected to be completed independently.*

**NPS hiring unit:**

**Title of Exception Position:**

**Objective or purpose of position:**

**Duties:**

**Position will be supervised by (provide position title):**

**Qualifications/training of AD employee that justifies or supports hiring him/her into this position:**

_____________________________________________		____________________________

**Name of person providing this description (please print)	Date**

_____________________________________________		____________________________

**Signature approval of NPS National Incident Bus. Lead		Date**

# image1.png
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2691 

To reduce temporarily the duty on AE 0172747 Ether. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on AE 0172747 Ether. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AE 0172747 ETHER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Chloro-4-mesyl-3-[(2,2,2- 

trifluoroethoxy)methyl]benzoic acid (CAS 

No. 120100–77–8) (provided 

for in subheading 

2930.90.29) ........................... 3.3% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2691 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
!. OFFICE OF THE AmORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

". .'

### Ekmcwablo E. 0. Outlaw,

page2

I

,

: “3. That the bU4pt of the aeuaty haYin& bwn met up

during August or 194l for the yarr then ed41tioaal Itam -not b6 inObde& .'c. The Cexmral Fuad **being lnm.ff~oiant**  the prepesml upenUtur0 woultlmubuarily **be** a charga a&&mt future yurar *There are y8rieus ether phuem et the pr0p0s0d’oentract about rhich I aa doubtful but Imf~6uri pnzr adtloe is fareillaz with thlr tf,-6 OSsltuatlen aa that it will **net** be naooesary te 60 into tham with you.
. @m County ha8 rowrate# the,t I a8k fee.r oplnlcul

and I tee we 

### l

ppreolatg it." .lutlols 2351-17, Vernui*s Annotate4 Cltil E(tmtutu, qaj@won the oeadJ!irlonerB 

## eoozt of Rny ,ootulty of ylls 8kk **to** 

### ewatr **a** re~elring fun&or fanA and **to** make 

### ap **ehrrete** 

### out of ~%he general awenuu or. 8aia 00anty to bo rued by said oeuntyor &mntlea in eoopgratlon **la&ted 8tates**  Departmentor hgrlmltuxe t6 altt aad aaaiat~bm a hme mea tloa ed

l mera l rum na

why ~00 

### doa&lnee 6e’appreve the abers nentlenad oontraat. Am the aeobty dou net hate wrlalent moaey In tha 

### general iand of 

### th&oaWy to l t up the rsrelrlng fund, (111 abevo nItate we do not think that the oeanty oan partialpate la the 

### rod &asp plaai Themiorr WI de 

### net deemlt~nsosaeary to dlroasr thr.ethr mao~u mentleaedla your letter rslatlng to yeaq~rw81 

### or the ooatrad. In eonnaotlen with t!w fere8elni me direot yem attentionto our eplalcnm Ho. O-4006 a54 Xcr. 94428 l lmllar qasstlcuzs. we enolwe oeplea of theaa opln aaa 

## ra I regerdln~ your ao5Ye5le5Oe.

..,.. ! ATl’ORNEY GENBIAL Ot TEXA8

APpRomD oplnloJl0omlttoi

By 8.1.8.ChaWmn
WJF
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-41227 Summary Calendar

BARBARA GUNERATNE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ST. MARY’S HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-95-CV-676

- - - - - - - - - - June 18, 1997 Before Wisdom, King, and Smith, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Barbara Guneratne filed this action against St. Mary’s Hospital alleging that the hospital unlawfully discriminated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12117, and 12201-12213 (also known as the Americans with Disability Act), and in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Guneratne also asserted a claim forNo. 96-41227 - 2 - retaliation in violation of the Texas Worker’s Compensation Act. The district court granted summary judgment in St. Mary’s favor and dismissed all claims. Guneratne appeals. Guneratne contends that district court erred in finding that she was unable to perform the essential functions of a clinical nurse and that the hospital could not make a reasonable accommodation for her. We have reviewed the record de novo and agree with the district court’s analysis. Accordingly, we AFFIRM for the reasons stated by the district court. See Guneratne v. St. Mary’s Hospital , No. G-95-676 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 1996).
GLOBAL
      ALTERNATIVE ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. 

    


    ______________,
      2007

    


    Fortune
      Management, Inc. 

    435
      Devon
      Park Drive

    Building
      700

    Wayne,
      Pennsylvania 19087 

    


    


    Gentlemen:

    


    This
      letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date
      (“Effective Date”) of the registration statement for the initial public offering
      (“IPO”) of the securities of Global
      Alternative Asset Management, Inc. (“Global”)
      and continuing until the earlier of the consummation by Global of a “Business
      Combination” or Global’s liquidation (in each case as described in Global’s IPO
      prospectus) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination
      Date”), Fortune Management, Inc. shall make available to Global certain office
      space, utilities and secretarial support as may be required by Global from
      time
      to time, situated at 435 Devon Park Drive, Building 700, Wayne, Pennsylvania
      19087 (or any successor location). In exchange therefor, Global shall pay
      Fortune Management, Inc. the sum of $7,500 per month on the Effective Date
      and
      continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date.

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	GLOBAL
              ALTERNATIVE
              ASSET MANAGEMENT,
              INC.
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	 
	 	
              
Name:
	 	Title:


    

     

    
      	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED
              BY:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Fortune Management, Inc.	 	 	 
	  	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 	 
	 	
              
Name:
	 	 	
            
	 	
              Title:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6793]

                    The Fine Arts Committee of the Department of State will meet on November 6, 2009 at 10 a.m. in the Henry Clay Room of the Harry S. Truman Building, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will last                           ( print page 55084)                        until approximately 11:30 a.m. and is open to the public.                

The agenda for the committee meeting will include a summary of the work of the Fine Arts Office since its last meeting on April 30, 2009 and the announcement of gifts and loans of furnishings as well as financial contributions from January 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009.

                    Public access to the Department of State is strictly controlled and space is limited. Members of the public wishing to take part in the meeting should telephone the Fine Arts Office at (202) 647-1990 or send an e-mail to                     *BurdenVK@State.gov*                     by October 30 to make arrangements to enter the building. The public may take part in the discussion as long as time permits and at the discretion of the chairman.                

Dated: October 1, 2009. 

Marcee Craighill,

Secretary, Fine Arts Committee, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-25672 Filed 10-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-35-P
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 20403 Summary Calendar

**____________ Wayne Smith,**  Plaintiff

— Appellant **,**

versus **David Hittner; MTGLQ Investors, L.P.; Brandon Hakari; Charles Eskridge; Sam S. Shelton; Clare I.**  **Cougill; Marilyn Burgess,** Defendants

— Appellees

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CV

- 3079

**______________________________** Before **Clement ,**  **Southwick ,**  and **Engelhardt ,**  Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Wayne Smith appeals the dismissal of his case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) . “ We review de novo the grant of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. ” Lampton v. Diaz , 639 F.3d 223, 225 (5th Cir. 2011) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the briefs and the record, we find Smith

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 18, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-20403 Document: 00516715725 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/18/2023No. 22

- 20403

2 hasn’t shown that he stated a claim upon which relief can be granted. See **Fed. R. Civ. P** . 12(b)(6). So, we **AFFIRM** and all pending motions are **D ENIED** 

. Case: 22-20403 Document: 00516715725 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/18/2023
#### MARRON v. ATLANTIC REFINING CO.

Civil Action No. 6595.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. 22, 1947.

*661Freedman, Landy & Lorry, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Otto Wolff, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

In this case the defendant has asked for clarification of the Court’s ruling that the 26th and 27th interrogatories as modified by the Court be answered. It appears in this case that the defendant has underwriters who are defending the case, and that the counsel for the underwriters is also the counsel for the defendant in the present case.

With that in mind, I make the following rulings :

First, if the underwriters have taken any statements of witnesses and transmitted the same to the defendant, they will be produced, without regard to whether they were transmitted through the medium of counsel for the defendant and its underwriters.

Secondly, the defendant need not produce the report to which it refers in its answer to the eighth interrogatory; namely, a confidential report received by it from its insurance brokers containing a summary and opinion of counsel for the underwriters.

Third, if the defendant has no copies of statements of witnesses taken by the underwriters and avers that after reasonable efforts to obtain same it has been unable to get them from the underwriters, it will so aver. Of course, if the copies are in the possession of counsel for the defendant and underwriters, that will be considered possession of the defendant. If under this ruling they are unable to produce statements or copies of them, the defendants will state the name and address of the person in custody of such reports, if any are in existence.

Fourth, the statements, reports, memoranda and so forth referred to are to be limited to statements or reports by witnesses to the accident, that term being understood- as broader than mere eye witnesses, and including persons who have knowledge which might reasonably be considered relevant to the issue. It will also include a report, if any, made by an investigator other than counsel employed either by the defendant or underwriters.

Fifth, it is incumbent on the defendant, even if it has no present knowledge or information of the matter required to be produced here, to make at least some effort to ascertain whether or not such matter exists in the possession of the underwriters or elsewhere, it being understood that knowledge of counsel for the defendant is the knowledge of the defendant.
INTER
PARFUMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
 Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an
officer of Inter Parfums, Inc., that the Quarterly Report of Inter Parfums, Inc.
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Inter Parfums,
Inc.





Date:
      August 7, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Jean MadarJean
      Madar,Chief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Inter Parfums, Inc. and will be retained by Inter Parfums, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 982 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 982

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rayon staple fibers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2005

  Ms. Collins introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rayon staple fibers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN RAYON STAPLE FIBERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.55.04        Viscose filament        Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           rayons having a                                                   31/2008          ''
                           decitex of less than                                                                .
                           5.0 and a multi-
                           limbed cross-section,
                           the limbs having a
                           length-to-width
                           aspect ratio of at
                           least 2:1 (provided
                           for in subheading
                           5504.10.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```