alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation  under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended  (49 U.S.C. 1383 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce  these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2009-0123.                 

*Date Filed:*                     May 20, 2009.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*

 PSC/RESO/143 dated 6 February 2009. 

 Finally Adopted Resolutions & Recommended Practices r1-r44. 

 PSC/MINS/026 dated 6 February 2009. 

 Minutes. 

*Intended effective date:*                     1 June 2009.                 

Barbara J. Hairston, 

Supervisiory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations,  Alternate Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E9-12959 Filed 6-2-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
**Safety & Occupational Health Program Evaluation Rating Criteria**

**FY 2010 – FY 2012**

*  Documentation required to be available/on-site to determine compliance.

13
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ROBERT DAMEON GROSS, 

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 13-52 (JEB)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 

 Defendant.

ORDER

Plaintiff filed the instant action in the District of Columbia Superior Court on November 

29, 2012, and Defendant District of Columbia removed it here on January 11, 2013. See ECF 

No. 1 (Notice of Removal). Eleven days later, the District moved for dismissal (including, for 

some reason, on counts not in the Complaint). See ECF No. 3. Plaintiff has since sought three 

extensions of time to file his Opposition, which the Court has granted, even though the third was 

filed nine days after the deadline for a response. See ECF No. 9. In granting this third Motion, 

the Court ordered that Plaintiff should respond to the District’s Motion by April 2. See Minute 

Order of March 18, 2013. As he has failed to do so, the Court will treat the Motion as conceded 

under LCvR 7(b).

The Court, accordingly, ORDERS that:

1. Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED; and 

2. The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
2

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ James E. Boasberg 

 JAMES E. BOASBERG

 United States District Judge

Date: April 8, 2013
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sheldon Dane CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-11899

Non-Argument Calendar.

D.C. Docket No. 04-00177-CR-J-25-HTS.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 30, 2006.

Peggy Morris Ronca, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*949Sheldon Dane Clark, Netallahassee, FL, pro se.

Before DUBINA, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Rodney G. Gregory, retained counsel for Sheldon Dane Clark in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Clark’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
#### Lester E. GILBERT, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 05-3260.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 14, 2006.

*1016Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Lester E. Gilbert appeals the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, which dismissed his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. *Gilbert v. Dept, of Justice,*SF0353040250-I-1, 98 M.S.P.R. 500 (MSPB Apr. 27, 2005). We *affirm.*

We review the board’s decision regarding its jurisdiction de novo. *King v. Briggs,*83 F.3d 1384, 1387 (Fed.Cir.1996). The petitioner bears the burden of establishing the board’s jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. *Clark v. United States Postal Serv.,*989 F.2d 1164, 1167 (Fed.Cir.1993); 5 C.F.R. § 1201.56(a)(2). Our review is limited to setting aside decisions that are arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or unlawful; procedurally deficient; or unsupported by substantial evidence. *See*5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (2000).

In order to establish jurisdiction for a restoration claim before the board, Gilbert was required to demonstrate that he was separated from service because of a compensable injury. *See*5 U.S.C. § 8151(b); 5 C.F.R. § 353.301. This requires showing that his separation was solely attributable to a compensable injury. *See Walley v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs,*279 F.3d 1010, 1016 (Fed.Cir.2002); *see also New v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs,*142 F.3d 1259, 1264-65 (Fed.Cir.1998) (observing that removal on grounds unrelated to a compensable injury forecloses a claim for restoration rights). Here, substantial evidence supports the finding that Gilbert resigned from his position “in lieu of facing a removal for his admitted misconduct in detonating a bomb in the workplace.” In particular, Gilbert admitted to his misconduct and resigned the following day. Although Gilbert’s alleged injury may have contributed to his resignation, it was not the sole cause. *Cf. Minor v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.,*819 F.2d 280, 282 (Fed.Cir.1987) (“An employee who has been removed for cause rather than a compensable injury is not entitled to restoration and cannot appeal to the Board.”) (citing *Cox v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.,*817 F.2d 100, 101 (Fed.Cir. 1987); *Miller v. United States Postal Serv.,*3 MSPB 418, 3 M.S.P.R. 336 (1980)). Although Gilbert argues that his receipt of benefits from the Office of Workers Compensation Programs (“OWCP”) establishes that his resignation was due to a compensable injury, OWCP decisions do not bind the board and, standing alone, are insufficient to establish jurisdiction. *See Cox v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.,*817 F.2d 100, 101 (Fed.Cir.1987). Because Gilbert failed to establish that his separation from service was solely attributable to a compensable injury, the board properly dismissed his petition.
#### In the Matter of Regan Horike, Respondent, v Mark Freedman, Appellant. (And Another Related Proceeding.)

Submitted March 28, 2011;

decided May 10, 2011

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the Family Court order denying appellant’s application, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remaining portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-8972-8]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notification of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the Good Neighbor Environmental Board (GNEB) will hold a public teleconference on November 3, 2009 from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. The meeting is open to the public. For further information regarding the teleconference and background materials, please contact Dolores Wesson at the number listed below.

*Background:*                         GNEB is a federal advisory committee chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92463. GNEB provides advice and recommendations to the President and Congress on environmental and infrastructure issues along the U.S. border with Mexico.                         *Purpose of Meeting:*                         The purpose of this teleconference is to discuss and approve the Good Neighbor Environmental Board's draft advice letter to the President on the environmental effects of the U.S.-Mexico border fence and associated infrastructure. The Board will also continue discussion on the Thirteenth Report to the President.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

If you wish to make oral comments or submit written comments to the Board, please contact Dolores Wesson at least five days prior to the meeting.

*General Information:*                     Additional information concerning the GNEB can be found on its Web site at                     *http://www.epa.gov/​ocem/​gneb.*

*Meeting Access:*                     For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Dolores Wesson at (202) 564-1351 or e-mail her at                     *wesson.dolores@epa.gov.*                     To request accommodation of a disability, please contact Dolores Wesson at least 10 days prior to the meeting to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.                

Dated: September 9, 2009.

Dolores Wesson,

Designated Federal Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-25592 Filed 10-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 10.17


 


Form of Equity Transfer Agreement


 


Transferor: [   ]


 


Transferee: Nanjing Dingxu Xinhui Technology Co.
Ltd.


 


	1.	The transferor agrees to transfer the equity interest in Jiangsu Easy Parking Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. in the amount of [   ] million (RMB) to the transferee.


 


	2.	The transferee agrees to receive the transferor’s equity interest in Jiangsu Easy Parking Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. in the amount of [   ] million (RMB)


 


	3.	The transfer will be officially carried out on [DATE]. From the date of the transfer, the transferor will no longer enjoy the rights or assume the obligations as a capital contributor in connection with the transferred capital contribution, and the transferee will enjoy the rights and assume the obligations as a capital contributor of Jiangsu Easy Parking Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. in connection with the transferred capital contribution.


 


This agreement will take effect after being signed
(sealed) by both parties.


 


Transferor’s signature:


Transferee’s signature:


 


[DATE]
#### In the Matter of Injah Tafari, Appellant, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Submitted December 20, 2010;

decided February 15, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from (a) the
condensed balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages 3 and 4 of
the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter and year-to-date ended September 30,
1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such (b) financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       8,043,450
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,319,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,062,063
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,644,636
<PP&E>                                         999,425
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,697,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,817,786
<BONDS>                                        414,695
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       213,362
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,251,645
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,697,488
<SALES>                                      5,486,849
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,096,240
<CGS>                                        3,098,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,088,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,866,328)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,866,328)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,866,328)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) by Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(the “Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   | /s/ Michael D. Price                         |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Michael D. Price                             |
|   | Vice President, Chief Financial              |
|   | Officer, Treasurer and Secretary             |
|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|   |                                         |
|   | August 4, 2004                          |

 

----
{"status":true,"count":3,"text":"\u003Cp class=\u0022messages messages--status\u0022\u003EAdded to cart\u003C\/p\u003E","id":"ajax-addtocart-message-7676","block":"\u003Cdiv class=\u0022basic_cart-grid basic-cart-block\u0022\u003E\n  \n\n          \u003Cdiv class=\u0022basic_cart-cart-contents row\u0022\u003E\n        \u003Cdiv class=\u0022basic_cart-cart-node-title cell\u0022\u003E\u003Ca href=\u0022\/publication-products\/age-related-hearing-loss\u0022\u003EAge-Related Hearing Loss\u003C\/a\u003E \u003C\/div\u003E\n              \n        \u003Cdiv class=\u0022basic_cart-cart-unit-price cell\u0022\u003E\n        \u003Cstrong\u003E\u003C\/strong\u003E    \n        \u003C\/div\u003E\n    \u003C\/div\u003E\n          \u003Cdiv class=\u0022basic_cart-cart-contents row\u0022\u003E\n        \u003Cdiv class=\u0022basic_cart-cart-node-title cell\u0022\u003E\u003Ca href=\u0022\/publication-products\/american-sign-language\u0022\u003EAmerican Sign Language\u003C\/a\u003E \u003C\/div\u003E\n              \n        \u003Cdiv class=\u0022basic_cart-cart-unit-price cell\u0022\u003E\n        \u003Cstrong\u003E\u003C\/strong\u003E    \n        \u003C\/div\u003E\n    \u003C\/div\u003E\n          \u003Cdiv class=\u0022basic_cart-cart-contents row\u0022\u003E\n        \u003Cdiv class=\u0022basic_cart-cart-node-title cell\u0022\u003E\u003Ca href=\u0022\/publication-products\/aphasia\u0022\u003EAphasia\u003C\/a\u003E \u003C\/div\u003E\n              \n        \u003Cdiv class=\u0022basic_cart-cart-unit-price cell\u0022\u003E\n        \u003Cstrong\u003E\u003C\/strong\u003E    \n        \u003C\/div\u003E\n    \u003C\/div\u003E\n      \n  \u003Cdiv class=\u0022basic_cart-cart-total-price-contents row\u0022\u003E\n        \u003Cdiv class=\u0022basic_cart-total-price cell\u0022\u003E\n            Total Price: \u003Cstrong\u003E 0,00 USD \u003C\/strong\u003E\n        \u003C\/div\u003E\n      \u003C\/div\u003E \n\n\n         \n\n\n       \u003Cdiv class=\u0022basic_cart-cart-checkout-button basic_cart-cart-checkout-button-block row\u0022\u003E\n        \u003Ca href=\u0027\/cart\u0027 class=\u0027button\u0027\u003EView cart \u003C\/a\u003E\n      \u003C\/div\u003E\n\n\n  \u003C\/div\u003E"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,100,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,144,821
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,490,917
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,173,474
<PP&E>                                       2,216,301
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,803,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,750,166
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,912,782
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,803,045
<SALES>                                     11,288,898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,288,898
<CGS>                                        7,677,063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,061,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   209
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,225,497
<INCOME-TAX>                                   463,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            762,297
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   762,297
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2617 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2617

      To suspend temporarily the duty on certain stick umbrellas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on certain stick umbrellas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UMBRELLAS HAVING AN ARC OF AT LEAST 96 CM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.66.01       Umbrellas, each     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          having an arc at                                                   31/2011.......
                          least 96 cm but
                          no greater than
                          120 cm, with a
                          curved handle
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          6601.99.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Tommy R. Jackson, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

Submitted March 28, 2011;

decided May 5, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that this motion does not properly lie to the Court of Appeals directly from the judgment of Supreme Court *(see*CPLR 5602). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.