alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re: Paul NAGY, Petitioner.

No. 06-7656.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 18, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 1, 2006.

Paul Nagy, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Paul Nagy petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, seeking disqualification of the district court, his attorney, and a therapist. Mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary situations. *Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *In re Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other *164means by which the relief sought could be granted, *id.,*and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *In re Catawba Indian Tribe,*973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires and that his entitlement to such relief is clear and indisputable. *Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.,*449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980). Nagy has failed to make the requisite showing, and we dismiss the mandamus petition. We deny the motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, for hearing en banc, and for disqualification of certain judges, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The emergency motion to expedite is denied as moot.

*PETITION DISMISSED.*
# **EXHIBIT32.1**

# ** **

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”) by Bentley Pharmaceuticals,Inc. (the “Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to hisknowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 
|             | /s/ James R. Murphy                                                        |   |
|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|             | James R. Murphy                                                            |
|             | Chairman of the Board of Directors,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|             | (Principal Executive Officer)                                              |
|             |                                                                       |
| November 4, 2004 |                                                                       |

 

----
PHOTO & VIDEO BPA

11 photographers & videographers available on 

contract to document wildfires and fire-related 

incidents.

Specify need for a photographer or videographer –

some of our contractors provide both services.

No name requests; we look for closest and available.

To place an order, email me (christine.schuldheisz@usda.gov) 

and include the following:

Incident Name

Service Type (photo, video or both)

Funding code or P-code 

Start date & duration
#### Kareemah BELL-BOSTON, Appellant v. NATIVITY HOMELESS SHELTER, Appellee.

No. 09-7019.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 6, 2009.

Kareemah Bell-Boston, Landover Hills, MD, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; and HENDERSON and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

*2ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 12, 2009, 2009 WL 321624, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because it is not a civil action arising under federal law, *see*28 U.S.C. § 1331, or between citizens of different states with an amount in controversy of more than $75,000, *see*28 U.S.C. § 1332.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
# FIRE INFORMATION

## DAILY ACTIVITY REPORT

Fire Name:_____________

Date:__________________
No. 954.

#### Public Service Company of Indiana et al. *v.*City of Lebanon.

March 16, 1942.

*Messrs. William P, Evans, Edmond W. Hebei,*
      *787
      *Willett H. Parr, Willett H. Parr, Jr., Ara Allen Parr,*and *Elza O. Rogers*for appellants. *Mr. Roscoe Hollingsworth*for appellee.

*786
      *Per Curiam:*

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. *McGovern*v. *New York City,*229 U. S. 363; *Roberts*v. *New York City,*295 U. S. 264; *Shriver*v. *Woodbine Savings Bank,*285 U. S. 467; *Pennsylvania Hospital*v. *Philadelphia,*245 U. S. 20; *Violet Trapping Co.*v. *Grace,*297 U. S. 119.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

RONALD G. DANDAR,

Appellant

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 19 WAP 2016

Appeal from the Order of 

Commonwealth Court entered March 

30, 2016 at No. 222 MD 2016.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2017, the Order of the Commonwealth 

Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

The “Motion to Modify and Correct Illegal Sentence Nunc Pro Tunc” is DENIED.
# image1.gif
BLM FireRecruitmentPostcard#WeAreBLMFire

1

Tell the BLM Fire story

BLM Fire recruitment postcards can be customized to be used for promoting BLM Fire jobs in your state, district, or field office. We want to highlight “why” people want to work for BLM Fire. It’s not just a job, it is a community. Careers in BLM Fire can take employees out of the office, working in outdoor recreation areas and traveling to places many people will never see. The natural resources we are charged to protect and the people we work with make this job great! Let’s promote that. 

Tell the BLM Fire story

The following slides have the two-sided  5”x7” BLM Fire recruitment postcard. Download the graphic by exporting the slides as a .jpg.

Additional slides provide a way to customize  the text on the front and back of the postcard. It also includes place holders where images from your BLM state or district can be added. 

Please use the QR code provided, it was created to meet BLM web governance standards.

Customize the postcard graphics

Copy the graphic onto a new slide.

Add your photo to the slide.

Resize to fit into the open box.

Select your photo, right click and choose “Send to Back”

Add your text on top of the graphic, resizing it to fit.

Export the slide as a .jpg or .png to use for social media.

Sample on the next slide.

Copy the graphic on the next two slides to a new slide.

Add your photo to the slide.

Resize to fit into the open black circle.

Select your photo, right click and choose “Send to Back”.

Export the slide as a .jpg or .png to use for printing.

Sample on the next slide.

Your local phone number

Your local email

Questions?

Please contact the BLM Fire external affairs staff at the National Interagency Fire Center for more information.

Phone: 208-387-5050

Other helpful links: BLM Fire Recruitment Toolkithttps://www.nifc.gov/about-us/our-partners/blm/blm-fire-recruitment-toolkit

BLM Fire Jobs Portal https://www.nifc.gov/careers/blm-fire-job

# image4.png

# image5.png

# image6.jpeg

# image7.jpeg

# image8.jpg

# image9.jpg

# image10.jpeg

# image11.png

# image12.png

# image13.png

# image1.jpeg

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
**Prevention/Mitigation & Education**

**Key Code: E = Exceeds Standard, M = Meets Standard, NI = Needs Improvement, NR = Not Reviewed**

Checklist #7 – Prevention/Mitigation & Education 	1	Revised June 2021

# image1.png
**EXHIBIT
      23.01**





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Forms
      S-3 (Registration No.'s 333-1314, 333-15959) and Forms S-8 (Registration No.'s
      333-1136, 333-1138) of Sandston Corporation of our report dated March 22, 2006
      on the financial statements of Sandston Corporation as of and for the years
      ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
      of Sandston Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005.





/s/
      Plante & Moran, PLLC





Auburn
      Hills, Michigan


March
      27,
      2006
**Exhibit 15.2**

**ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE FRAMEWORK ACT ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS**

 

**
 
**

Amended by Enforcement DecreeNo. 22605 of Dec. 31, 2010, effective Jan. 24, 2011 

CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS 

Article 1 (Purpose) 

The purpose of thisEnforcement Decree is to provide matters delegated under the Framework Act on Telecommunications (the “Act”) and matters necessary for its enforcement. 

CHAPTER II Deleted <by Enforcement Decree No. 21692 of Aug. 18, 2009> 

Article 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 Deleted <by Enforcement Decree No. 21692 of Aug. 18, 2009> 

CHAPTER III TELECOMMUNICATIONSFACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT 

Article 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31 Deleted <byEnforcement Decree No. 22550 of Dec. 27, 2010> 

Article 32 Deleted <by Enforcement Decree No. 22605 of Dec. 31, 2010>

 
1 

CHAPTER IV Deleted <by Enforcement Decree No. 22550 of Dec. 27, 2010> 

Article 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42 Deleted <by Enforcement Decree No. 22550 of Dec. 27, 2010> 

CHAPTER V Deleted <by Enforcement Decree No. 22550 of Dec. 27, 2010> 

Article 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 and 51 Deleted <by Enforcement Decree No. 22550 of Dec. 27, 2010>. 

CHAPTER VI SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS 

Article 52 Deleted <by Enforcement Decree No. 22550of Dec. 27, 2010> 

Article 53 Deleted <by Enforcement Decree No. 22550 of Dec. 27, 2010> 

Article 54 Deleted <by Enforcement Decree No. 22605 of Dec. 31, 2010> 

Article 54-2 Deleted <by Enforcement Decree No. 22550 of Dec. 27, 2010> 

Article 55Deleted <by Enforcement Decree No. 22605 of Dec. 31, 2010> 

ADDENDA <Enforcement Decree No. 22605, Dec. 31, 2010>(Enforcement Decree of The Radio Waves Act) 

Article 1 (Enforcement Date) 

This Act shall take effect on January 24, 2011. 

 
2 

Article 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 Deleted 

Article 13 (Amendments to Other Laws) 

(1),(2) and (3) Deleted 

(4) The Enforcement Decree of FRAMEWORK ACT ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS shall be partially amended as follow:

Article 32, 54 and 55 Deleted 

(5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) Deleted 

 
3
AUGUST 2010 CALENDAR

The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. SALVATORE CACAVALLO, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-08-559 DECISION

On July 8, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison, for the offense of Count I: Identity Theft, a felony.

On August 5,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Connor Murphy. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was farther advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 5th day of August, 2010.

DATED this 13th day of August, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2685 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2685

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2-Dimethylbutanoic acid 3-(2,4-
       dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro(4.5)dec-3-en-4-yl ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2-Dimethylbutanoic acid 3-(2,4-
       dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro(4.5)dec-3-en-4-yl ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,2-DIMETHYLBUTANOIC ACID 3-(2,4-DICHLOROPHENYL)-2-OXO-1-
              OXASPIRO(4.5)DEC-3-EN-4-YL ESTER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.02 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2,2-Dimethylbutanoic acid 3-
(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro(4.5)dec-3-en-4-yl ester) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
----

Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
I, Michael Ash, CFO of The Tirex Corporation (the "Company") do herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 
-  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the  period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

*/s/    Michael Ash*Michael Ash, CFO 

Date: November 10, 2005
### Supreme Court ofthe United States Office ofthe Clerk 

## Washington, DC 20543-0001 April 27, 2015 Scott S. Harris Clerk of the Court (202)479-3011 Clerk 

### Court ofAppeals ofTexas, Fifth District 600 Commerce Street Dallas, TX 75202-4658 Re: Jesse Cole v. Generations Adoptions, et al. No. 14-1024 (Your No. 05-12-00919-CV) Dear Clerk: 

# CL£RK^oiiTRlCTAPR302015 "*«* 5ftosr. 20/5 

# CLEf*. 5th0/S71R/cr

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case: The petition for a writ ofcertiorari is denied. Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk••••••Pi OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON, DC 20543-0001 OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE S300 B«m je.jeSPQSv UNOFFICIALMAIL C " yOL PENALTY FOR V PRIVATE USE $300 n PHNIY BOWES 

### 02 1R $ 00.48° 0000012042 APR 27 2015 MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 20543



## 752G2S&&3X CGG4 ^tfllll,»»llll,llll,,Il"ll»l|i«,,llH«llH»l|l»Ml*tt||
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          14,120
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               255,949
<PP&E>                                         449,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,874
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 710,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          380,642
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,194
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   710,393
<SALES>                                        213,138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               213,138
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  351,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (13,914)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (152,480)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (152,480)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (152,480)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (152,480)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.021)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.021)
        

</TABLE>
RESOURCE ORDER INITIAL 

DATE/TIME

2. INCIDENT/PROJECT NAME 3. INCIDENT/PROJECT ORDER NUMBER OFFICE REFERENCE NUMBER

5. DESCRIPTIVE LOCATION/RESPONSE AREA 6. SEC. TWN RNG Base MDM 8. HOST UNIT DISPATCH PHONE & EMAIL 9. JURISDICTION/AGENCY

7. MAP REFERENCE 10. ORDERING OFFICE

11. AIRCRAFT INFORMATION LAT. LONG.

BEARING DISTANCE BASE OR OMNI AIR CONTACT FREQUENCY Ground Contact FREQUENCY RELOAD BASE OTHER AIRCRAFT/HAZARDS

12.

Request 

Number

Ordered 

Date/ 

Time

To Q 

T 

Y RESOURCE REQUESTED

Needed Deliver 

To

To

Time Agency 

ID RESOURCE ASSIGNED

RELEASED

From Date/Time From Date To

13. ORDER RELAYED

ACTION TAKEN

ORDER RELAYED

ACTION TAKEN

Req. No. Date Time To/From Req. No. Date Time To/From

NFES 2214 (7/87)
2. INCIDENT/PROJECT NAME 3. INCIDENT/PROJECT ORDER NUMBER OFFICE REFERENCE NUMBER

PAGE 

OF 

DATE / TIME TO / FROM DOCUMENTATION
RESOURCE ORDER 2. INCIDENT/PROJECT NAME 3. INCIDENT/PROJECT ORDER NUMBER INCIDENT FINANCIAL CODE

12.

Request 

Number

Ordered 

Date/ 

Time

To/From

Q 

T 

Y 

RESOURCE REQUESTED

Needed Deliver 

To

To

Time Agency 

ID RESOURCE ASSIGNED

Date/Time

RELEASED

From Date To
2. INCIDENT/PROJECT NAME 3. INCIDENT/PROJECT ORDER NUMBER INCIDENT FINANCIAL CODE

PAGE 

OF 

DATE / TIME TO / FROM DOCUMENTATION
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,278,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                   219,368
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,154,026
<PP&E>                                       3,260,438
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,059,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,433,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,737,779
<BONDS>                                        508,602
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,187,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,433,489
<SALES>                                      3,311,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,311,892
<CGS>                                        2,218,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,218,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               721,330
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                367,957
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            367,957
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   367,957
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to
U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Edward J. Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc.,
hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
2005 of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-KSB) upon my best knowledge and
belief fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Derma Sciences, Inc.

|Dated:  March 30, 2006 | /s/ Edward J. QuiltyEdward J. Quilty
     Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Cabrini Terrace Joint Venture, Respondent, v Charles O’Brien, Appellant.

Submitted August 23, 2010;

decided October 26, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain it *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3; CPLR 5602). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.