alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 884.

#### Rogoway *v.*Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, McNeil Island, Washington.

March 2, 1942.

*Ted Bogoway, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge,*and *Messrs. Oscar A. Provost*and *W. Marvin Smith*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and motion for leave to proceed further *in forma pauperis,*denied.
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, John L. Threshie Jr., CEO of The Tirex Corporation (the"Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge: 

1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period endedDecember 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
2. 

The informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ 

  John L. Threshie Jr                                   John L. Threshie Jr., CEO 

Date: February 13, 2008
EXHIBIT 99.3
                                
                                
The Board of Directors
Prime Receivables Corporation:

We have applied certain agreed-upon procedures, as discussed
below, to the accounting records of Prime Receivables Corporation
("Prime"),  a wholly-owned special-purpose finance subsidiary of
Federated Department Stores, Inc. ("Federated"),  relating to the
servicing procedures performed by FDS National Bank, as Servicer,
under the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement") dated December 15, 1992 between Prime, as
Transferor, Federated and The Chase Manhattan Bank, successor to
Chemical Bank, as Trustee, on behalf of the Certificateholders of
Prime Credit Card Master Trust and under the Assumption Agreement
dated September 15, 1993 between Prime, Federated, FDS National
Bank and The Chase Manhattan Bank, successor to Chemical Bank.
This agreed-upon procedures engagement was performed in
accordance with standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.   The sufficiency of these
procedures is solely the responsibility of the specified users of
the report. Consequently, we make no representations regarding
the sufficiency of the procedures described below either for the
purpose for which this report has been requested or for any other
purpose.  Our procedures and findings are as follows:

     In   accordance   with  section  3.06(b)   of   the
     Agreement, we recalculated each amount set forth in
     items (i) through (xvi) of each monthly certificate
     prepared  by  the  Servicer,  pursuant  to  section
     3.04(c)  of  the Agreement, during the period  from
     February   1,  1997  to  January  31,  1998,   (the
     "Certificates")    from    information    in    the
     Transferor's   computer   generated   Daily    Cash
     Allocation Reports, the Agreement, the Series 1992-
     1  Supplement  to the Agreement dated December  15,
     1992, the Series 1992-2 Supplement to the Agreement
     dated   December  15,  1992,  the   Series   1992-3
     Supplement  to  the  Agreement dated  December  31,
     1992, the Series 1995-1 Supplement to the Agreement
     dated   July   27,  1995,  or  the  Series   1996-1
     Supplement to the Agreement dated May 14, 1996,  as
     appropriate.  We found such recalculated amounts to
     be in agreement with the amounts set forth in items
     (i) through (xvi) of the Certificates, as amended.

We were not engaged to, and did not, perform an examination, the
objective of which would be the expression of an opinion on
management's assertion.   Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.   Had we performed additional procedures, other matters
might have come to our attention that would have been reported to
you.

This report is intended solely for your information and is not to
be referred to or distributed for any purpose to anyone other
than The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee, Moody's Investor
Services, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Corporation, as the Rating
Agencies, Investor Certificateholders or the management of Prime.



                              KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

April 27, 1998
November 13, 2023 

Memorandum 

To: Bureaus Human Capital Officers

 Bureau Fire Directors

From: Jennifer A. Ackerman

 Director, Office of Human Capital 

 Deputy Chief Human Capital Officer 

Subject: International Travel Requirements for Administratively Determined (AD) Pay 

Plan for Emergency Workers (Casuals)

Effective immediately, the 2023 Administratively Determined (AD) Pay Plan for Emergency 

Workers (Casuals), Section A. paragraph 5, is amended to remove the sentence, “This plan does 

not provide the authority to hire individuals for out-of-country assignments.” ADs may now be 

mobilized under established agreements with international partners. When the AD Pay Plan for 

2024 is issued, the language referenced above will be removed and the remainder of the plan will 

be updated, as necessary.

This memorandum is in response to the increased wildland fire activities occurring on lands 

managed by our international wildland fire management partners. In carrying out international 

commitments to mutual wildland fire management assistance, the Department of the Interior 

(DOI) recognizes the important role that Administratively Determined (AD) workers play in 

supporting wildfire response efforts. 

As of Fiscal Year 2024, Emergency Workers (Casuals) performing their duties outside of the 

United States must meet the following requirements prior to international travel: 

• All AD employees are required to possess a valid United States passport. ADs may 

conduct international travel using a valid personal passport. 

• All AD employees must complete the E-Country Clearance (ECC) prior to travel. 

• The Counter Threat Awareness Training (CTAT) has been waived for emergency 

international wildland firefighter travel.

The serving bureau/office of the employee is required to verify that all internal bureau processes 

and requirements have been met and that background checks and fingerprint clearances for the 

AD have been initiated. The DOI International Travel Clearance Form (DI-1175) is not a 

requirement for AD employees to travel for emergency response activities. The office of 

JENNIFER 

ACKERMAN

Digitally signed by 

JENNIFER ACKERMAN 

Date: 2023.11.14 

17:03:01 -05'00'
2

Wildland Fire will work with the servicing bureaus/offices to obtain the deployment data and 

information. 

AD employees provide an invaluable service and a demonstrated commitment to wildland fire 

management. DOI and its partners are grateful for the support from the members of the wildland 

fire communities. 

Any Department employee or employee representative seeking further information concerning 

this memorandum may contact their respective servicing HRO. Bureau Headquarters Human 

Resources staff may contact DOI_Office_of_Human_Resources@ios.doi.gov.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          48,649
<SECURITIES>                                    37,643
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,781
<INVENTORY>                                     35,721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,883
<PP&E>                                          62,493
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,260
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                     189,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   223,042
<SALES>                                        238,788
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               238,788
<CGS>                                           97,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                87,444
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   270
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,267
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,564
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,703
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.72
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2642 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2642

    To suspend temporarily the duty on man-made shells used in the 
                     manufacture of sleeping bags.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on man-made shells used in the 
                     manufacture of sleeping bags.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAN-MADE SHELLS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF SLEEPING BAGS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.63.07      Man-made shells     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        used in the                                                        31/2011.......
                        manufacture of
                        sleeping bags
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        6307.90.89)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Sheril G., Respondent. Arnon D. Siegel, Nonparty Appellant; Berwitz & DiTata, LLI] Nonparty Respondent.

Submitted June 14, 2010;

decided September 14, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal denied. Cross motion for the imposition of sanctions denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wolverine Tube, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the period ending July 4, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis J. Horowitz, Chief
Executive Officer of Wolverine Tube, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Wolverine Tube, Inc. and will be retained by Wolverine Tube, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

/s/  Dennis J. Horowitz

Dennis J. Horowitz
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2004
COOPERATOR AIRCRAFT USE VALIDATION FORM 

Must be completed daily prior to any fire operations by a federal dispatcher. ONLY where there is “significant or 

imminent threat to life or property” and there are no federal contract aircraft available, may Cooperator aircraft be 

used on a federal fire. 

United States Code 49 §40125 (a)(1) requires certification that the use of Cooperator aircraft is necessary to respond to 

a significant and imminent threat to life or property (including natural resources) and that no service by a private 

operator is reasonably available to meet the threat. 

Today’s Date: Incident #:

Incident Name: Request #:

Responding Agency Aircraft ID# N #:

SIGNIFICANT OR IMMINENT THREAT TO LIFE OR PROPERTY (Check all that are appropriate)

Life

Property – Homes, Businesses, Outbuildings, Land Property

Natural Resources – Land, Timber, Watershed, Wildlife Habitat

FLIGHT OPERATIONS TO BE CONDUCTED

Initial Attack Helicopter

Extended Attack Fixed-wing

Large Fire Support Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Water Dropping – Helicopter/Water Scooper Helitack Response

Airtanker – All Types Aerial Firing Operations

Firefighter Transport Medevac – Firefighter/ Civilian including Hoist

Detection – Lightning/ Smoke Other

FEDERAL CONTRACT AIRCRAFT AVAILABILITY

Aircraft Cannot Meet Date and Time Needed

Aircraft Cannot Meet Operational Needs – List Reason

No Suitable Aircraft Available

Aircraft on Order

CERTIFYING DISPATCHER

Name 

Title 

Agency 

Date & Time
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                             164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89
<INVENTORY>                                        706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,325
<PP&E>                                           9,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,139)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,922
<BONDS>                                            988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,907
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,717)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,347
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,009
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    271
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                271
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       271
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
United States Department of the Interior 

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 

1849 C Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20240 

**ELECTRONIC COPY ONLY – NO HARD COPY TO FOLLOW** 

IN REPLY REFER TO: 

A7627 (2460) March 21, 2008 

Memorandum 

To: Regional Directors 

Attn: Superintendents 

From: for Director /s/ Daniel N. Wenk

Subject: Interagency Fire Program Management Qualification Standards and Guide- 

 Implementation Responsibilities and Consequences 

As we approach the Interagency Fire Program Management (IFPM) Qualifications Standards and Guide 

(IFPM Standard) implementation deadline of October 1, 2009, it is important that we ensure that all of 

our employees in one of the 14 key IFPM positions meet the minimum qualification standards by the 

implementation deadline. 

The attached memorandum from Associate Deputy Secretary, James E. Cason, Interagency Fire Program 

Management Qualifications Standards and Guide – Implementation Responsibilities and Consequences, is 

intended to reaffirm the roles and responsibilities of employees and their supervisors. Additionally, the 

memorandum defines the consequences of not meeting the minimum qualification standards by the 

established deadline. 

The responsibility does not rest only with employees and their supervisors. Park managers must also take 

an active role in ensuring that fire management personnel within their organizations develop and maintain 

qualifications in accordance with current policy. Likewise, Human Resources managers have an integral 

role within IFPM. Human Resources Specialists are responsible for evaluating qualifications and 

notifying employees of their status, as well as providing guidance to wildland fire managers. 

The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) is responsible for overall program implementation 

of the IFPM Standard. They have asked the IFPM Implementation Team to look at possible alternatives 

to the existing qualification standards. Regardless of the outcome of the requested review the intent of the 

attached memorandum remains. 

Please be assured that implementation of the IFPM Standard has been a collaborative effort and will 

continue to be in order to ensure its success. Implementation of a new workforce development initiative 

such as the IFPM Standard has its challenges, but the long-term benefits of shaping our future fire 

management workforce are immeasurable. 

Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. If you have questions related to the 

implementation of the IFPM Standard please contact Mark Koontz, Wildland Fire Training Program 

Manager, at (208) 387-5090 (Mark_Koontz@nps.gov) or Melissa Anglin, Human Resources Specialist, at 

(252) 473-3468 (Melissa_Anglin@nps.gov). 

Attachment
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2573 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Aminodiphenylamine (4ADPA). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Aminodiphenylamine 

(4ADPA). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-AMINODIPHENYLAMINE (4ADPA). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4-Aminodiphenylamine 

(4ADPA) (CAS No. 101–54– 

2) (provided for in subheading 2921.51.50) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2573 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# PL 1

  Subscribe to PL 1
#### Franklin v. Wiggins

Case below: 179 N.C. App. 434

No. 496P06

Pit’s Motion for “NOA” (COA05-1205)

Dismissed *Ex Mero Motu*01/25/07
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Martek Biosciences Corporation ("the Company"), hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge, on the date hereof:



Date:
December 29, 2009

|   |  |                                                     |  | 
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By |  | /s/ STEVE DUBIN Steve Dubin Chief Executive Officer |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Martek Biosciences Corporation and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
The Honorable Royce C. Johnston County Attorney Kenedy County P. 0, Box 1226 Kingstille, Texas 78363 Opinion No. H- 718 Re: Local option status ofa county which has never conducted a local option election. Dear Mr. Johnston: You have requested our opinion concerning the wet-dry status of a county which has never held a local option election. Article 16. section 20 of the Texas Constitution empowers the Legislature to provide for elections whereby the voters ofvarious political subdivisions m=Y “determine . . . whether the sale of intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes shall be prohibited or legalized. . , . ” Article 666-23, Penal Axdiary Laws provides that all areas which are not “dry” pursuant to a local option election shall be “wet!‘. Thus neither the Constitution nor the statutory law would prohibit the sale ofintoxicating liquor unless an area is “dry” pursuant to a local option election. Itis well established that “no act or omission is a crime unless made so by the written law ofthe state.” 16Tex. Jur. 2d, Criminal Laws 51, and authorities cited therein. Accordingly, in our opinion the sale ofintoxicating beverages is illegal only in an area which is “dry”pursuant to a local option election. Where there has been no such election the sale ofintoxicating beverages is not illegal and the area involved is therefore “wet”. We are supported in our view by dicta from two Texas cases. InSanders v. State, 157 S.W. 2d 910 (Tex. Grim. App. 1941), the court stated:

. . . under the terms ofArt, 666-23, Vernon’s Annotated Penal Code, all area ofthe state is
‘wet, ’ except that which has been determined to be ‘dry. ’ Unless the proof shows that the area is ‘dry, ’ it is by law ‘wet. ’

p. 3079The Honorable Royce C. Johnston, page 2

InStell v. State, 496 S.W. 2d 623 (Tex. Grim. App. 19731, the court stated:

Under the State Constitution. . . (Article XVI 520, as amended 1933, 1935). all of the State is ‘wet’ except those parts which have been declared ‘dry’ by local option elections.

SUMMARY Where apolitical subdivision has never held a local option election, the area it encompasses is “wet”. Very truly yours,

/ / Attorney General of Texas APPROVED: u

DAVID M. KENDALL, First Assistant

C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee

p. 3080