26820 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, and 

44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.17; 14 CFR 11.38 

and 11.19. 

The Proposed Special Conditions 

Accordingly, the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) proposes the 

following special conditions as part of 

the type certification basis for Cessna 

Aircraft Company, model 525C (CJ4) 

airplanes. 

Cessna Aircraft Company, Model 525C 

(CJ4) Lithium Ion Battery Installation 

In lieu of the requirements of 14 CFR 

part 23, § 23.1353(a) through (e), lithium 

ion batteries and battery installations on 

the Cessna Aircraft Company, model 

525C (CJ4) airplane must be designed 

and installed as follows: 

(1) Safe cell temperatures and 

pressures must be maintained during 

any probable charging or discharging 

condition, or during any failure of the 

charging or battery monitoring system 

not shown to be extremely remote. The 

Li-ion battery installation must be 

designed to preclude explosion or fire in 

the event of those failures. 

(2) Li-ion batteries must be designed 

to preclude the occurrence of selfsustaining, uncontrolled increases in 

temperature or pressure. 

(3) No explosive or toxic gasses 

emitted by any Li-ion battery in normal 

operation or as the result of any failure 

of the battery charging or monitoring 

system, or battery installation not 

shown to be extremely remote, may 

accumulate in hazardous quantities 

within the airplane. 

(4) Li-ion batteries that contain 

flammable fluids must comply with the 

flammable fluid fire protection 

requirements of 14 CFR part 23, 

§ 23.863(a) through (d). 

(5) No corrosive fluids or gasses that 

may escape from any Li-ion battery may 

damage surrounding airplane structure 

or adjacent essential equipment. 

(6) Each Li-ion battery installation 

must have provisions to prevent any 

hazardous effect on structure or 

essential systems that may be caused by 

the maximum amount of heat the 

battery can generate during a short 

circuit of the battery or of its individual 

cells. 

(7) Li-ion battery installations must 

have a system to control the charging 

rate of the battery automatically, so as 

to prevent battery overheating or 

overcharging, and 

(i) A battery temperature sensing and 

over-temperature warning system with a 

means for automatically disconnecting 

the battery from its charging source in 

the event of an over-temperature 

condition, or, 

(ii) A battery failure sensing and 

warning system with a means for 

automatically disconnecting the battery 

from its charging source in the event of 

battery failure. 

(8) Any Li-ion battery installation 

whose function is required for safe 

operation of the airplane, must 

incorporate a monitoring and warning 

feature that will provide an indication 

to the appropriate flight crewmembers, 

whenever the capacity and SOC of the 

batteries have fallen below levels 

considered acceptable for dispatch of 

the airplane. 

(9) The Instructions for Continued 

Airworthiness (ICAW) must contain 

recommended manufacturers 

maintenance and inspection 

requirements to ensure that batteries, 

including single cells, meet a safety 

function level essential to the aircraft’s 

continued airworthiness. 

(i) The ICAW must contain operating 

instructions and equipment limitations 

in an installation maintenance manual. 

(ii) The ICAW must contain 

installation procedures and limitation in 

a maintenance manual, sufficient to 

ensure that cells or batteries, when 

installed according to the installation 

procedures, still meet safety functional 

levels, essential to the aircraft’s 

continued airworthiness. The limitation 

must identify any unique aspects of the 

installation. 

(iii) The ICAW must contain 

corrective maintenance procedures to 

functionally check battery capacity at 

manufacturers recommended inspection 

intervals. 

(iv) The ICAW must contain 

scheduled servicing information to 

replace batteries at manufacturers 

recommended replacement time. 

(v) The ICAW must contain 

maintenance inspection requirements to 

visually check for a battery and/or 

charger degradation. 

(10) Batteries in a rotating stock 

(spares) that have experienced degraded 

charge retention capability or other 

damage due to prolonged storage must 

be functionally checked at 

manufacturers recommended inspection 

intervals. 

(11) System Safety Assessment 

process should address the software and 

complex hardware levels for the 

sensing, monitoring and warning 

systems, if these systems contain 

complex devices. The functional hazard 

assessment (FHA) for the system is 

required based on the intended 

functions described. The criticality of 

the specific functions will be 

determined by the safety assessment 

process for compliance with 14 CFR 

part 23, § 23.1309, and Advisory 

Circular 23.1309–1D contains 

acceptable means for accomplishing this 

requirement. For determining the failure 

condition, the criticality of a function 

will include the mitigating factors. The 

failure conditions must address the loss 

of function and improper operations. 

These special conditions are not 

intended to replace 14 CFR part 23, 

§ 23.1353 in the certification basis of the 

Cessna Aircraft Company, model 525C 

(CJ4) airplanes. The proposed special 

conditions would apply only to Li-ion 

batteries and battery installations. The 

battery requirements of 14 CFR part 23, 

§ 23.1353 would remain in effect for 

batteries and battery installations on the 

Cessna Aircraft Company, model 525C 

(CJ4) airplane that do not use Li-ion 

chemistry. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on May 27, 

2009. 

John Colomy, 

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–12994 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[USCG–2009–0249] 

RIN 1625–AA09 

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; 

CSX Railroad, Trout River, Mile 0.9, 

Jacksonville, FL 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

change the regulations governing the 

operation of the CSX Railroad Bridge 

across the Trout River, mile 0.9, 

Jacksonville, Florida. This proposed 

rule would allow the bridge to operate 

using an automated system, without an 

onsite bridge tender. Currently, the 

bridge is required to open on signal 

from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m.; and from 10 

p.m. until 6 a.m. The draw shall open 

on signal if at least 12 hours notice is 

given. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before August 3, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2009–0249 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules 26821 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these methods. See the ‘‘Public 

Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or e-mail Mr. Barry Dragon, 

Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge 

Branch, telephone number 305–415– 

6743, e-mail barry.dragon@uscg.mil. If 

you have questions on viewing or 

submitting material to the docket, call 

Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted, 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2009–0249), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material Online (http:// 

www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment Online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand delivery, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a phone number in the body 

of your document so that we can contact 

you if we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment Online, go 

to http://www.regulations.gov, select the 

Advanced Docket Search option on the 

right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG– 

2009–0249’’ in the Docket ID box, press 

Enter, and then click on the balloon 

shape in the Actions column. If you 

submit your comments by mail or hand 

delivery, submit them in an unbound 

format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, 

suitable for copying and electronic 

filing. If you submit them by mail and 

would like to know that they reached 

the Facility, please enclose a stamped, 

self-addressed postcard or envelope. We 

will consider all comments and material 

received during the comment period 

and may change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, select the 

Advanced Docket Search option on the 

right side of the screen, insert USCG– 

2009–0249 in the Docket ID box, press 

Enter, and then click on the item in the 

Docket ID column. You may also visit 

the Docket Management Facility in 

Room W12–140 on the ground floor of 

the Department of Transportation West 

Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. We have an 

agreement with the Department of 

Transportation to use the Docket 

Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008 issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one using one of the four methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why one would be beneficial. If 

we determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

Background and Purpose 

The CSX Railroad owner has 

requested that the Coast Guard remove 

the existing regulations governing the 

operation of the CSX Railroad Bridge 

over the Trout River and allow the 

bridge to operate utilizing an automated 

system. The request is made because 

there are only four train transits per day, 

which require short transit times. Under 

the proposed rule, the bridge would 

remain in the open position to vessel 

traffic at all other times. 

The CSX Railroad Bridge is located on 

the Trout River, mile 0.9, Jacksonville, 

Florida. The current regulation 

governing the operation of the CSX 

Railroad Bridge is published in 33 CFR 

117.337 and requires the bridge to open 

on signal from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m.; and 

from 10 p.m. until 6 a.m. the draw shall 

open on signal if at least 12 hours notice 

is given. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes to change 

the operating regulations of the CSX 

Railroad Bridge so that the bridge can 

operate automatically. There are only 

four train transits per day across this 

bridge. The proposed action would 

remove the requirement that a bridge 

tender be present to open the bridge on 

signal for vessel traffic. The bridge 

would remain in the open position until 

a train approaches to cross the bridge. 

When a train approaches, the CSX 

signal department shall send an 

electronic signal to the bridge to order 

the closure sequence to begin. The 

bridge control system will activate a 

series of scanners along the water level 

to detect any marine traffic within the 

bridge closure area. The bridge control 

system will turn off the green channel 

markers and turn on the red bridge 

warning strobe lights and 

simultaneously sound a signal, which 

will last throughout the entire closing 

period. The bridge shall remain closed 

position to vessel traffic until the train 

has sufficiently cleared the bridge area. 

When the train has cleared, the bridge 

control system shall again sound a 

signal for the entire period the bridge is 

opening. When the bridge is in the fully 

open position, the red bridge warning 

strobe lights shall turn off, and the green 

channel marker lights will relight. The 

bridge will remain in the open to vessel 

traffic position until the next train 

crossing. If at any time the scanners 

detect a vessel within the bridge 

structure, the opening/closing sequence 

will automatically be halted until the 

vessel clears the structure. Additional 

strobe lighting shall be placed on the 

26822 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules 

structure to warn vessels of impending 

closure. 

Signs shall be posted on both sides of 

the navigation channel indicating, 

‘‘Caution; this bridge operates by remote 

control.’’ A toll-free, CSX contact 

telephone number shall be posted on 

the signs for emergencies. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, 

Regulatory Planning and Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office 

of Management and Budget has not 

reviewed it under that Order. Vessel 

traffic will be able to transit under the 

bridge with the exception of the short 

closure periods required for the trains to 

transit over the bridge. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. The proposed rule will affect 

vessel traffic under the bridge and daily 

train crossings over the bridge. 

However, the proposed rule will not 

change the number of times the bridge 

will need to be in a closed position for 

trains. Additionally, the bridge will 

remain in the open to navigation 

position at all other times for the benefit 

of vessel traffic. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please consult Mr. Barry 

Dragon, Seventh Coast Guard District, 

Bridge Branch, telephone 305–415– 

6743, e-mail barry.dragon@uscg.mil. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520.). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for 

Federalism under Executive Order 

13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial 

direct effect on State or local 

governments and would either preempt 

State law or impose a substantial direct 

cost of compliance on them. We have 

analyzed this proposed rule under that 

Order and have determined that it does 

not have implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 or more in any one year. 

Though this proposed rule will not 

result in such an expenditure, we do 

discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 

in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not effect a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules 26823 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 0023.1, 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD which guides the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions which do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment because it 

simply promulgates the operating 

regulations or procedures for 

drawbridges. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 

Bridges. 

Regulations 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: 

PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE 

OPERATION REGULATIONS 

1. The authority citation for part 117 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 

CFR 1.05–1(g). 

2. Revise § 117.337 as follows: 

§ 117.337 Trout River. 

The draw of the CSX Railroad Bridge 

across the Trout River, mile 0.9 at 

Jacksonville, operates as follows: 

The bridge is not tender. 

(a) The draw is normally in the fully 

open position, displaying green lights to 

indicate that vessels may pass. 

(b) As a train approaches, provided 

the scanners do not detect a vessel 

under the draw, the lights change to 

flashing red and a horn continuously 

sounds while the draw closes. The draw 

remains closed until the train passes. 

(c) After the train clears the bridge, 

the lights continue to flash red and the 

horn again continuously sounds while 

the draw opens, until the draw is fully 

open and the lights return to green. 

Dated: May 12, 2009. 

R.S. Branham, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, 

Seventh Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. E9–12979 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2009–0342] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zones; Annual Events 

Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain 

of the Port Lake Michigan Zone 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR Part 165 to amend the 

rules that restrict vessels from portions 

of water areas during events that pose a 

hazard to public safety. The safety zones 

proposed in this rulemaking are 

necessary to protect spectators, 

participants, and vessels from the 

hazards associated with fireworks 

displays, air shows, and other events. 

DATES: Comments and related materials 

must reach the Coast Guard on or before 

July 6, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by Coast Guard docket 

number USCG–2009–0342 to the Docket 

Management Facility at the U.S. 

Department of Transportation. To avoid 

duplication, please use only one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Online: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(3) Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on 

the Ground Floor of the West Building, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The telephone 

number is 202–366–9329. 

(4) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call BM2 Adam Kraft, Prevention 

Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake 

Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747– 

7154. If you have questions on viewing 

or submitting material to the docket, call 

Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2009–0342), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a telephone number in the 

body of your document so that we can 

contact you if we have questions 

regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, select the 

Advanced Docket Search option on the 

right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG– 

2009–0342’’ in the Docket ID box, press 

Enter, and then click on the balloon 

shape in the Actions column. If you 

submit your comments by mail or hand 

delivery, submit them in an unbound 

format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, 

suitable for copying and electronic 

filing. If you submit comments by mail 

and would like to know that they 

reached the Facility, please enclose a 

stamped, self-addressed postcard or 

envelope. We will consider all 

comments and material received during 

the comment period and may change 

the rule based on your comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, select the 

Advanced Docket Search option on the 

right side of the screen, insert USCG– 

2009–0342 in the Docket ID box, press 

Enter, and then click on the item in the 

Docket ID column. You may also visit 

the Docket Management Facility in 

Room W12–140 on the ground floor of 

the Department of Transportation West 

Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,