alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2498 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of manufacturing equipment entered on or after May 11, 1997, and before October 

21, 1998. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain 

entries of manufacturing equipment entered on or after 

May 11, 1997, and before October 21, 1998. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT ENTERED ON 

5 OR AFTER MAY 11, 1997, AND BEFORE OCTO6 BER 21, 1998. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections 514 and 

8 520 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520) 

9 or any other provision of law, not later than 90 days after 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2498 IS

1 the receipt of the request described in subsection (b), any 

2 article— 

3 (1) that was entered, or withdrawn from ware4 house for consumption— 

5 (A) on or after May 11, 1997; and 

6 (B) before October 21, 1998; and 

7 (2) with respect to which heading 9902.84.89 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

9 States would have applied if such article had been 

10 entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consump11 tion, on December 31, 2001, 

12 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such heading 

13 9902.84.89 applied to such entry or withdrawal, and U.S. 

14 Customs and Border Protection shall refund any excess 

15 duty paid with respect to such entry. 

16 (b) REQUESTS.—Liquidation or reliquidation may be 

17 made under subsection (a) with respect to any entry only 

18 if a request therefor is filed with U.S. Customs and Bor19 der Protection, not later than 180 days after the date of 

20 the enactment of this Act, that contains sufficient infor21 mation to enable U.S. Customs and Border Protection— 

22 (1) to locate the entry; or 

23 (2) to reconstruct the entry if it cannot be lo24 cated. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0332 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. JOSHUA PAUL CORRIHER ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 28 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 9 2021

03/09/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0332
National Fire and Aviation Executive Board 

To: 

From: 

Date: 

Subject: 

Memorandum 

Fire Management 

National Fire and Aviation Executive Board 

June 27,2006 

IFPM Minimum Qualifications Standards Data to be Entered into IQCS 

To assist fire managers and supervisors in tracking their employees progress in meeting the IFPM 

qualification, a standardized enhancement has been developed for the Incident Qualifications and 

Certification System (IQCS). This enhancement will assist first line supervisors to develop Individual 

Development Plans for their employees and identi@ and schedule needed training and education. 

Supervisors will thus be better able to assist their employees to meet the IFPM qualifications during the 

5-year implementation period. 

The modifications to IQCS have been completed, and the IFPM specific pages will be available for data 

entry starting on July 10,2006. We are asking that the IFPM requirements be entered into IQCS 

by January 1,2007 for all employees who have been identified to be in one of the 14 key positions. 

If an employee does not meet all the requirements for their IFPM position, the data can be entered into 

IQCS and updated as the employee works toward meeting the requirements for their position. 

An IQCS Training Module (IFPM Module) has been developed to explain the steps necessary for 

entering the FPM data into IQCS. An IFPM-IQCS Update Form has also been developed to 

consolidate all the relevant information for entry into IQCS. The training module and update form can 

be found on the IQCS website. 

An "IFPM user role" was developed to allow individuals, other than current account managers, access 

to the IQCS System to maintain the IFPM data. The IFPM user role only allows access to the IFPM 

specific pages. Access to existing competencies, qualifications, training, and experience related to 

wildland fire positions will continue to be maintained by existing account managers. Ifit is determined 

that an existing account manager is to maintain the IFPM minimum qualification standards, that role 

can be added to their current access. All IFPM user roles will be granted using the same request process 

that is currently in place (i.e. Account Request Form). Please refer to the IQCS website 

@~://~QG~Rwc~.EBv) for more information on obtaining access to IQCS. 

IFPM Minimum Qualifications 

Standards Data - IQCS Page 1 of 2 
ff you have any questions, please contact your National WPM Fire Management representative. 

M&C Rounsaville 

USDA-Forest Service 

Fire and Aviation Management 

Deputy Director 

Fire and Aviation 

Deputy Director 

/3Ut*- 

Brian McManus 

U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 

Fire Director 

Division of Fire and Aviation Management Fire Director 

Chief 

IFPM Minimum Qualifications 

Standards Data - IQCS Page 2 of 2
2018 BLM SAFECOM 

SUMMARY

Kirk Rothwell National Aviation Safety & Training Advisor

10/2/18
2018 BLM Safecoms

Aircraft Type

Airtanker Multi-engine

SEAT

Helicopter

Helitanker

Airplane

UAS

Other

14%

28%

37%

17%

3%

Other: Safecoms submitted that did not fit into 

the scope of the Safecom system. Such as 

inappropriate attempts at defaming aviation 

users, private company submissions and 

duplicates. 

BLM Total FY18 = 140

12/12/2018
2018 BLM Safecom by Category

12/12/2018

Note, a single safecom submission may have multiple categories assigned. 

Hazard 83

Maintenance 67

Incident 58

Management 26

UAS 17

Airspace 16

Mishap Prevention 5

Accident 2

Not indicated 2

Grand Total 143
2018 BLM Safecoms

2018 Type 2017

# Submitted % # Submitted %

4 3 Airtanker

(multi-engine) 8 7

21 15 SEAT 11 10

39 28 Helicopter 32 30

1 1 Helitanker 1 1

51 37 Airplane 39 37

24 17 UAS 12 11

0 0 N/A 4 3

Total 140 ~30% 107

N/A to include submissions not directly related to aircraft type. 12/12/2018
2018 BLM Safecoms by State

24

6

2

22

16

1

18

5

18 18

4

17

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

AK AZ CA CO ID MT NV NM OR/WA UT WY *NAO

Safecom * NAO includes Smkj and ASM aircraft

12/12/2018
Safecom Annual Submission Average 

with Flight Time Correlation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

RW (avg 48)

FW (avg 44)

SEAT (avg 13)

UAS (avg = 6 )

Total 

Flt 

Hrs.

17453 19682 17236 30322 24900 15040 22338 23846 23507 28434

RW 6589 8831 6227 12285 6724 5974 4852 8856 8892 8866

FW 7432 8527 8643 12169 13602 6474 12646 14624 6747 14778

SEAT 1817 1493 2366 5868 4574 2592 4439 1927 7868 4175

UAS 0 0 0 0 0 UNK 69 62 435 615 12/12/2018
2018 BLM Safecom

Submission Rate

Aircraft

Type

2018 Flt 

Hours

Total Safecom 

Submissions Per flight hour

Rotor Wing 8866 40 (11 other agency) 1/222

Fixed Wing 14,778 55 1/269

SEAT 4175 21 (24 other agency) 1/199

UAS 615 24 (29 other agency) 1/26

Total All 28,434 139 (921 all) 1/205

*Safecoms submitted during BLM Operational Control only* 

Does not reflect submissions by BLM aviation while under other bureau or agency operational control. 

12/12/2018
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0332

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSHUA PAUL CORRIHER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 28, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 9 2021

03/09/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0332
#### Spaulding v. Honeywell Int’l, Inc.

Case below: 184 N.C. App.-(3 July 2007)

No. 390P07

Pit-Appellant’s PDR (COA06-1221)

Denied 11/08/07
-  Home 
        -  Research & Funding 
        -  Research Training & Career Development 
        -  Funding Eligibility by Career Level 
        -  High School & Undergraduate Student 

Funding Eligibility by Career Level
-  High School & Undergraduate Student 
-  Doctoral & Medical Student 
-  Post Doctorate 
-  Junior Faculty 
-  Established Investigator 

# Career Level: High School & Undergraduate Student

          - High School & Undergraduate Student
          - Doctoral & Medical Student
          - Post     Doctorate
          - Junior     Faculty
          - Established Investigator

NIDDK and NIH offer many programs for high school and undergraduate students to gain experience in biomedical research. Contact NIDDK training program staff with questions well in advance of deadlines.  

## NIH Summer Programs

NIDDK Intramural laboratories, located on NIH campuses, participate in the NIH summer programs for students.
Explore NIH summer programs

## NIDDK Diversity Research and Training Opportunities for Students

NIDDK supports programs that encourage a diverse workforce through our Office of Minority Health Research Coordination. These programs include:
            - Short-Term Research Experience Program to Unlock Potential (STEP-UP)
            - NIDDK Diversity Summer Research Training Program (DSRTP)
Explore diversity opportunities for students

## NIDDK Undergraduate Summer Research Programs in Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases

The Division of Kidney, Urologic and Hematologic Diseases (KUH) supports summer research programs targeted to undergraduates.  Please visit the individual programs for details:
            - Mayo Clinic SURF
            - Yale SOM-Nephrology SURF
            - Emory SOM-Nephrology SURF
            - University of Alabama, Birmingham
            - University of Texas—San Antonio Health Sciences Center
            - University of Texas Southwestern (SURISKD)
            - Harvard/Brigham SURF
            - Vanderbilt SOM-Nephrology SURF

See About Funding Mechanisms for an overview of mechanisms commonly used by NIDDK to fund researchers.
**SEAT Mangers Daily Briefing Worksheet**

***Review the following topics each day and provide the aircrew members with any update:***

***The products listed below can be found on each of the different GACC web sites under the “Predictive Services” section.  Check the ones that were discussed during the briefing.***

**Safety Message:**

***Provide time to discuss a safety related topic that will encourage group discussion and participation.   Safety related topics can be found on the  “Wildland Fire Lesson Learned Center”.  Check the topics discussed during the briefing.***
#### BERGER et al. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA.

Civil Action No. 7609.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

Feb. 20, 1948.

James F. Masterson, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

I. Jerome Stern, Asst. City Sol., of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

McGRANERY, District Judge.

This is a tort action against the city of Philadelphia by Aleck and Esther Berger, husband and wife. The case arises upon defendant’s motion to stay plaintiffs’ taking depositions, alleging that the requisite diversity of citizenship of the parties is lacking and that the notice to take depositions violates Rule 26, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, which requires leave of court and an opportunity given to the defendant *40to be heard. By agreement of counsel, the question of jurisdiction has been submitted to this court on the deposition of Aleck and Esther Berger, with the subsidiary issue of the propriety of plaintiffs’ procedure under Rule 26 continued pending argument, if necessary.

The law in these matters is not complex, although determination of the factual issues may be difficult. Domicile and citizenship, for this purpose, may be taken as synonymous. “Residence in fact, coupled with the purpose to make the place of residence one’s home, are the essential elements of domicile.” See State of Texas v. State of Florida, 306 U.S. 398, 424, 59 S.Ct. 563, 576, 830, 83 L.Ed. 817, 121 A.L.R. 1179. And once acquired, domicile continues until it is superseded by a new domicile. Restatement, Conflict of Laws, Sec. 23.

From the evidence submitted, I make the following

Findings of Fact

1. Plaintiffs and their children were all residing at 5649 North 5th St., Philadelphia, Pa., in December, 1943, shortly before Mr. Berger went into service. At that time plaintiffs regarded their dwelling place as their home.

2. During Aleck Berger’s time in service, Esther Berger moved, with the children, to St. Petersburg, Florida, where she bought a home at 2640 Burlington Avenue, North. Aleck Berger came to regard this address as his home while in the service, and was discharged in Florida, where he rejoined his wife. At that time, both plaintiffs regarded their new dwelling place as their home.

3. Job opportunities did not materialize as hoped for, and in May of 1947, plaintiffs left Florida to come to Atlantic City, where Aleck Berger had a brother. When he arrived, Aleck Berger’s intention was to establish a business and a home in Atlantic City. Plaintiffs lived in Atlantic City until the time of suit, and Aleck Berger worked there. Shortly thereafter, in September, 1947, plaintiffs moved back to Philadelphia to 5649 North 5th Street.

Conclusions of Law

1. In December, 1943, plaintiffs were domiciled in and citizens of the State of Pennsylvania.

2. After Aleck Berger’s discharge from service, plaintiffs were domiciled in and citizens of the State of Florida.

3. At the time this suit was brought on August 1, 1947, plaintiffs were domiciled in and citizens of the State of New Jersey.

4. Diversity of citizenship exists in this case.

5. An order will be entered to that effect.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of KT Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



/s/ CHANG-GYU HWANGChang-Gyu HwangChief Executive Officer


Date: April 28, 2017



/s/ KWANG SUK SHINKwang Suk ShinExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


Date: April 28, 2017

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to KT Corporation
and will be retained by KT Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00754

- CV

VERDE ENERGY SOLUTIO NS

, LLC and Robert Thomae,

Appellants

v.

SGET DUVAL OIL I , LLC,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- 19

- 230

Honorable Baldemar Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appellants’ motion to dismiss is

GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.

We order that appellee SGET Duval Oil I, LLC recover its costs of this appeal, if any, from

appellants Verde Energy Solutions LLC and Robert Thomae.

SIGNED February 12, 2020.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice
No. 828.

#### Herbert, Trustee, *v.*Sullivan et al.

February 9, 1942.

*James A. Herbert, pro se. Mr. Charles B. Rugg*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Digital Media Corporation (the "Company") for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Ng, Chief Executive Officer and I, Chung Lai Lok, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify that:
 
 * the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 * information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented.
 
 /s/ Ng Chi Shing

Ng Chi Shing

Director, President, Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Chung Lai Lok

Chung Lai Lok

Chief Financial Officer



November 10, 2010
  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 933.

#### In the Matter of Petition of Ethyl M. Shibe for Writ of Prohibition to the Orphans' Court of Philadelphia County and to Lewis H. Van Dusen.

*821March 30, 1942.

*Ethyl M. Shibe,*

*pro se.*

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 
10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,524,474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  937,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,425,705
<PP&E>                                       3,043,971
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,828,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,651,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,013,378
<BONDS>                                         75,572
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        104
<COMMON>                                         1,506
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,560,512
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,651,072
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,202,550
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  450,407
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               594,976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6,808)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                163,975
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            163,975
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   163,975
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 289 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the taxable 

income limit on percentage depletion for oil and natural gas produced 

from marginal properties. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 21, 2009 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. COBURN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate 

the taxable income limit on percentage depletion for oil 

and natural gas produced from marginal properties. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF TAXABLE INCOME LIMIT ON 

4 PERCENTAGE DEPLETION FOR OIL AND NAT5 URAL GAS PRODUCED FROM MARGINAL 

6 PROPERTIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (H) of section 

8 613A(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 289 IS

1 to oil and natural gas produced from marginal properties) 

2 is amended to read as follows: 

3 ‘‘(H) NONAPPLICATION OF TAXABLE IN4 COME LIMIT WITH RESPECT TO MARGINAL PRO5 DUCTION.—The second sentence of subsection 

6 (a) of section 613 shall not apply to so much 

7 of the allowance for depletion as is determined 

8 under subparagraph (A).’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2008. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING ANDFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Tirex Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,John L. Threshie Jr., President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ JOHN L. THRESHIE JR.John L. Threshie Jr. President February 17, 2004
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10−K  for the year ended December 31, 2010 of Craft Brewers Alliance, Inc.; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BY:    | /s/ Mark D. Moreland                                           |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |       Mark D. Moreland                |
|   |   |       Chief Financial Officer         |
|   |   |          and Treasurer |

----