alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

|  | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates      and for the periods presented. |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Ng Chi Shing                             |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| Ng      Chi Shing                                 |
| Director,      President, Chief Executive Officer |
|                                              |
|                                              |
| /s/      Ng Chi Shing                             |
| Ng      Chi Shing                                 |
| Chief      Financial Officer                      |
|                                              |
|                                              |
| May      6, 2008                                  |
----

**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION

I,  John L. Threshie Jr., certify that: 

(1) I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of The Tirex Corporation; 

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small businessissuer and have: 

(a) 

Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) 

Evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

(c) 

Disclosed inthis report any change in the small business issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financialreporting; and 

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

(a) 

All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

(b) 

Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

/s/  John L. Threshie Jr.              John L. Threshie Jr., CEO 

Date: February 11, 2009 

----
#### O’DONEL v. GREAT LAKES S. S. CO., Inc.

Civil Action No. 24080.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

Oct. 29, 1946.

Gordon F. Basler, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Robert Branand, of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

*502JONES, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this case sues under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., for unpaid overtime compensation and damages.

The defendant has filed a motion attacking the complaint in several respects. This Court has heretofore held Section 11225 of the Ohio General Code applicable and that part of the motion will be sustained. See Remley v. Triangle Publications, D.C., 69 F.Supp. 808.

Subsequent to the filing of the defendant’s motion, the plaintiff has moved to amend her complaint by interlineation. In view of the liberality expressed in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 15, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, and the above ruling of the Court, leave is granted to file an amended complaint within *twenty (20)*days.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7370

ROOSEVELT SABB, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN OF BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Orangeburg. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (5:21-cv-02603-BHH)

Submitted: October 24, 2023 Decided: November 7, 2023

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roosevelt Sabb, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7370 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/07/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Roosevelt Sabb, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Sabb’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

petition, and denying reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzales v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sabb has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7370 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/07/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
2015 Bureau of Land Management
Interagency Aviation Training (IAT) Delivery Report

Interagency Aviation Training Summary
Bureau of Land Management

FY2015 BLM Instructor Delivered Student Completions by Course
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60

40

20
5 —_ = i.

A-100 - AliS All6 A-200 A219 R310 310 PLDO RT-27: 273 RT-372 $271
BLM Delivered (324) 185 3 7 5 2

October 2015 Page 40f4


2015 Bureau of Land Management
Interagency Aviation Training (IAT) Delivery Report

Interagency Aviation Training Summary
Bureau of Land Management

FY2015 Student Completions by State

600
@ Interactive TV
® Online
500 Residential Classroom
= Webinar
400
300
200
- | | | |
or hk bk heh ee 2 Oe ee
Montana/ New | Oregon
Alaska Arizona | California Colorado Idaho Dakotas Nevada Mexico | “ashinet Utah wyoming
on
Interactive TV 2 1 1 8
= Online 287 489 147 134 237 147 197 397 149 350 146 129
Residential Classroom 73 141 25 15 70 34 66 51 71 71 52 143
& Webinar 3 12 2 3 8 10 24 29 2 ee 10 7

October 2015

Page 1of4


2015 Bureau of Land Management
Interagency Aviation Training (IAT) Delivery Report

Interagency Aviation Training Summary
Bureau of Land Management

FY2015 Student Completions by Delivery Method

600

m Alaska (642)
500 m Arizona (174)
California (152)
too TM Colorado (316)

idaho (191)
TM® Montana/Dakotas (287)
300 m Nevada (451)
TM New Mexico (222)
200 = Oregon/Washington (432)
m Utah (208)
TM Wyoming (287)
100 L l= Unassigned (365)
0 ~_ Lael a

Interactive TV (12) Online (2809) Residential (812) Webinar (121)

October 2015 Page 2 of 4


2015 Bureau of Land Management
Interagency Aviation Training (IAT) Delivery Report

7
G
£
£
3
a
bo
£
£
a
©
i
c
Ss
2
a
>
<
>
o
ra
o
20
o
£
G
2
&

Bureau of Land Management

FY2015 Student Completions by Course

m ous
 €1v35
1 21v3s
a Tiv3s
Tees
m Tes
022-5
mmm 74E-Lu
| eee
wey
oad
m= HIN
a ZHIN
a THA
ee AI
mi vs dno
viow
{ osb-v
vley
| view
m lev
mi o1e-v
| soe-y
m LOeW
a 906-¥
mi s0ey
a pOeY
mm €0e-Y
mm ZOEY
m Sz-¥
ett-v
ory
mmm 6TC-Y
mmm B1Z-¥
0 600
a 80t-¥
mm 400-V
mm S0-¥
mm 7 02-¥
mmm €07-¥
mi 0t-¥
COZY
_——— OTT-Y
wm sity
© SSTeIty
a erty

om TT
SS  OTT-Y
jut 600-¥

et LOl-V

es OL

mmm €0L-¥

| cow

Page 3 of 4

October 2015
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00022-CV

PLEASANT GROVE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant

V.

FIELDTURF USA INC. AND ALTECH, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15C1318-102

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Court reporter Amanda J. Leigh recorded the trial court proceedings in appellate cause 

number 06-19-00022-CV, styled Pleasant Grove Independent School District v. FieldTurf USA 

Inc. and Altech, Inc., trial court cause number 15C1318-102 in the 102nd Judicial District Court 

of Bowie County, Texas. The reporter’s record was originally due in this matter on March 11, 

2019. That deadline was extended twice by this Court, on Leigh’s motions, resulting in the most 

recent due date of May 10, 2019. Although we warned Leigh that additional requests to extend 

the filing deadline would not be granted, absent extraordinary circumstances, she has nonetheless 

filed a third request for an extension of the filing deadline.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly 

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c). The 

Rules further instruct that an “appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely 

filing of the appellate record.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by the Rules, 

we find we must take steps to ensure that the record in this case is filed in a reasonable amount of 

time.

We, therefore, order Leigh to file the reporter’s record in cause number 06-19-00022-CV, 

styled Pleasant Grove Independent School District v. FieldTurf USA Inc. and Altech, Inc., trial 

court cause number 15C1318-102 in the 102nd Judicial District Court of Bowie County, Texas, to 

be received no later than June 10, 2019.
3

If the reporter’s record is not received by June 10, we warn Leigh that we may begin 

contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this 

Court for failing to obey its order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: May 14, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10QSB FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SPETEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,888
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (787)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,345
<PP&E>                                          42,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,485)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,734
<BONDS>                                        125,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,708
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           145
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,628
<SALES>                                         84,996
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,996
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   483
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (12,284)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,902)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,902)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,902)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Eric Hurlburt, Respondent, v Crystal Behr, Respondent. Attorney for the Child, Appellant.

Submitted September 13, 2010;

decided December 16, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant, having taken no appeal to the Appellate Division, may not appeal to the Court of Appeals from the Appellate Division order of affirmance.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                           AUREAL SEMICONDUCTOR INC.
 
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       FISCAL YEAR
                                                           ------------------------------------
                                                             1996         1995          1994
                                                           --------     ---------     ---------
<S>                                                        <C>          <C>           <C>
Weighted average common shares outstanding for the year
  and shares used in primary earnings per share
  calculation............................................    33,344        20,000        13,859
                                                           --------     ---------     ---------
 
Earnings (loss) used in per share calculations from:
  Continuing operations..................................  $(17,020)    $(103,833)    $(157,956)
  Discontinued operations................................        --            --        (8,501)
  Extraordinary item.....................................        --            --       131,329
                                                           --------     ---------     ---------
                                                           $(17,020)    $(103,833)    $ (35,128)
                                                           ========     =========     =========
 
Earnings (loss) per share and equivalent shares from:
  Continuing operations..................................  $  (0.51)    $   (5.19)    $   11.40)
  Discontinued operations................................        --            --         (0.61)
  Extraordinary item.....................................        --            --          9.48
                                                           --------     ---------     ---------
                                                           $  (0.51)    $   (5.19)    $   (2.53)
                                                           ========     =========     =========
</TABLE>
 
---------------
 
NOTE: Primary earnings (loss) per share is based upon weighted average common
and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Equivalent shares
are calculated using the treasury stock method and consist of outstanding stock
options that have a dilutive effect on earnings per share. No stock option
information was incorporated into the calculations for any fiscal year presented
as, due to the net losses, any affect would be anti-dilutive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000892038
<NAME>                        TELEPAD CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                           1,418,770
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                      668,922
<ALLOWANCES>                       107,000
<INVENTORY>                      3,474,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                11,885,141
<PP&E>                           1,078,588
<DEPRECIATION>                    (505,639)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  12,485,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            2,026,448
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                        10,459,331
<OTHER-SE>                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    12,485,779
<SALES>                          2,017,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 2,240,104
<CGS>                            2,128,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    2,230,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   317,607
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                (253,197)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (6,089,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                    (6,089,682)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0



</TABLE>
# 

**MEDIA ADVISORY INVITATION**

# 2013 GREAT BASIN ENGINE ACADEMY

**WHEN**:  Tuesday, April 23, 2013, 10am. 

**WHERE**:  Old St. George Airport Terminal, 317 S. Donlee Dr, St. George, Ut.

**WHAT**:  U.S. Forest Service Great Basin Engine Academy. Local media are invited to attend “Engine Skills Day” as part of this event.  

The Great Basin Engine Academy (GBEA) is an****intense 80-hour course designed to expose the students to all aspects of wildland fire engine operations with an emphasis on practical application and testing.      

Following is a brief description of activities planned for Tuesday, April 23, 2013. This day is critical in the student’s curriculum and is the longest and most complicated day of the academy. The Academy skills testing includes the following stations: advanced driving course, pumping/drafting and scenarios, evasive driving maneuvers course, I-zone backing exercise, and engine maintenance. On this day, you will see student’s skills tested driving wildland fire engines.  For a preview video of what goes on at our academy visit: www.fs.usda.gov/goto/GBEA

“The objective of the Great Basin Engine Academy is to increase the safety of wildland firefighters” said, Kevin Greenhalgh, U.S. Forest Service, Great Basin Engine Academy Team Leader. “Improving and developing the firefighter’s skills in driving, pumping, and maintenance, will improve the professionalism of the students and increase their ability to operate safely and efficiently. This results in increased situational awareness for our wildland firefighters,” stated Greenhalgh. 

**Note:** This event is not open to the public.

**Attention assignment editors, reporters, & correspondents:**Contact Kim Osborn at the U.S. Forest Service (801)710-3664 if you are interested in attending this event or for further information. Media representatives interested in attending this event need to meet at the Old St. George Airport Terminal at 10am on April 23, 2013. 

###

# _1271511751.bin
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
                 ----------------------------------------------
         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
         Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-71822) (pertaining to
         the 1992 Stock Option Plan) and Form F-3 No. 333-112136, of
         our report dated February 17, 2004, with respect to the
         consolidated financial statements of LanOptics Ltd. included
         in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
         31, 2003.

         Tel Aviv, Israel                   /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & KASIERER
         March 31, 2004                     -------------------------------
                                            KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
                                            A Member of Ernst & Young Global


                                       59
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 12.2


                                   CERTIFICATE

I, KENNETH J. WARREN, hereby certify that I am the duly elected Secretary of
Cable Link, Inc. an Ohio corporation (the "Corporation"), and do further certify
that the following resolutions were duly adopted by the Board of Directors of
the Corporation at a meeting duly called and held on February 25th, 2000, and
that such resolutions have not been amended or rescinded, and are in full force
and effect:

         RESOLVED, that each officer and director who may be required to execute
an annual report on Form 10-KSB or any amendment or supplement thereto ( whether
on behalf of the Company or as an officer or director thereof or otherwise) be,
and each of them hereby is, authorized to execute a power of attorney appointing
Bob Binsky and Brenda L. Castle and each of them severally, his or her true and
lawful attorneys and agents to execute in his or her name, place and stead (in
any such capacity) said Form 10-KSB and all instruments or reports necessary or
in connection therewith, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, each of said attorneys and agents to have the power to act with or
without the other, to have full power and authority to do and to perform in the
name and on behalf of each of said officers and directors, or both, as the case
may be, every act which is necessary or advisable to be done as fully, and to
all intents and purposes, as any such officer or director might or could do in
person; and further

         Dated this 25th day of February, 2000.


                                            /s/ Kenneth J. Warren
                                            Kenneth J. Warren


                                       55