alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5300-N-05]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, Office of Native American Programs, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        HUD announces the availability of funds and the funding criteria for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Indian Community Development Block Grant (ICDBG) Program for Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Villages. The Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) makes approximately $65 million available under the Department of Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Act 2009 (Pub. L. 111-8, approved March 11, 2009). Applicants for assistance under this NOFA must address applicable requirements in the FY 2009 ICDBG NOFA and the Notice of HUD's Fiscal Year 2009 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) Policy Requirements and General Section to the HUD's FY2009 NOFAs for Discretionary Programs; Notice (also known as the General Section) published on December 29, 2008 (73 FR 79548), as amended on April 16, 2009 (74 FR 17685). Applicants should take particular note that they should follow the application submission instructions contained in the NOFA and not use those in the General Section. The notice providing information regarding the application process, funding criteria and eligibility requirements is available on the HUD Web site at                         *http://www.hud.gov/​offices/​pih/​ih/​grants/​icdbgl.cfm.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions regarding specific program requirements should be directed to your Area Office of Native American Programs. A contact list for each Area ONAP can be accessed at                         *http://www.hud.gov/​offices/​pih/​ih/​codetalk/​onap/​map/​nationalmap.cfm*. Persons with speech or hearing impairments may access this telephone number via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service during working hours at 800-877-8339.                    

Dated: May 18, 2009.

Paula O. Blunt,

General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.

[FR Doc. E9-13081 Filed 6-1-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION OF  THE TRUSTEE*  OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as explained in Note 1
to the Trusts financial statements contained in the Report, in accordance with
Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 47, released September
16, 1982, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from
generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other
royalty trusts); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE
SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    /s/ Lee Ann AndersonName:  Lee Ann AndersonTitle:  Vice President and Senior Trust Officer


Date: November 9, 2007 
 *
    
    The Trust has no executive officers.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eduardo Miranda, Appellant.

Submitted August 2, 2010;

decided September 16, 2010

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
**Interagency Fire Preparedness**

**Readiness Review Guide**

**2006**

**Fire Preparedness Readiness Review**

Preface

This fire preparedness readiness review system was developed by a national task force from the following agencies:

United States Department of Agriculture

Forest Service

United States Department of the Interior

Bureau of Land Management

National Park Service

Bureau of Indian Affairs

U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Fire Preparedness Readiness Review

**Contents**

**Subject**

Introduction 

Fire Readiness Review - Objectives 

**Checklists**

Agency Administrator1 

Fire Management Administration2 

Geographic Area Coordination Center3 

Aviation Management4

Safety Officer5 

Training6 

Aviation Base Review7 

Individual Firefighter8 

Dispatch9 

Engines10 

Interagency Hotshot Crew11 

Smokejumper12 

Helicopter Module13 

Dozer14 

Hand Crew Non-IHC15 

Mitigation-Prevention16 

**Optional Materials**

Drills and Skills Summary 

Drills and Skills 

Prescribed Fire/Wildland Fire Use 

Lookout 

Draft ROSS 

**Potential Fire Program Review Materials**

Severity Audit Checklist 

Incident Business Checklist 

**Fire Preparedness Readiness Review**

Introduction

This preparedness readiness review guide is designed for use by fire managers, supervisors, and fire modules to evaluate the level of fire readiness.

This system will allow for efficient documentation and immediate feedback of the results of the evaluation on the selected units. It is intended to provide consistency in the evaluation of fire resources.

This guide should be adopted to meet local conditions and can be subdivided to use only the appropriate checklists for the selected area. The following will provide suggestion for use:

1.Checklists are designed to be used, all or in part.  Select the checklists that are needed to meet the review objectives.

2.The checklists are developed to provide recommended elements and may or may not reflect agency policy.

3.Some checklist elements may appear to be duplicated, but provide adequate coverage, if all checklists are not utilized.

4.The ratings:

**E**=Above AverageIndicates that the element/activity was completed at a level higher than expected.

**M**=SatisfactoryPerformance meets expectations.

**NI**=Needs ImprovementElement performance does not meet expectations.

**NR**=Not ReviewedElement was not reviewed because it was determined to be not needed or appropriate for the review objectives.

**Fire Preparedness Readiness Review Objective**

**Name:**

**Location:**

The primary objective for the Fire Preparedness Readiness review is to provide a comprehensive operational inspection, evaluation and report on the selected suppression resources. The technical evaluation will, as a minimum, review the following fire checklists that have been selected for this review:

**Checklists**

**Optional Materials**

**Potential Fire Review Materials**
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41301 Conference Calendar

JERRY LYNN WILKINS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus SUZANNE R. HASTINGS, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CV-335

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jerry Lynn Wilkins, a federal prisoner (# 27842-077), filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking to challenge his 1995 convictions on multiple counts of conspiracy, frauds and swindles, and aiding and abetting. The district court dismissed Wilkins’s petition without prejudice due to his failure to comply with a court order that he replead his petition with more specificity. Wilkins filed this appeal challenging the district court’s dismissal of his petition.No. 02-41301 -2- On appeal, Wilkins argues only the propriety of the court order requiring him to replead his petition. His failure to brief the non-compliance-with-a-court-order issue, the basis of the dismissal of his habeas petition, is the same as if he had not appealed the judgment. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the appeal is without arguable merit, and we dismiss the appeal as frivolous. See Howard v. King 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7575
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CARSON DARRELL RODGERS, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 06-6576
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CARSON DARRELL RODGERS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00374-WLO; 1:04-cv-00498) Submitted: September 26, 2006 D ecided: September 28, 2006- 2 - Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carson Darrell Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Carson Darrell Rodgers seeks to appeal the district court’s orders adopting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and subsequent motion to reopen judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). These orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Sl ack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rodgers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Rodgers’ motions for certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification**
I, Stephen J. Hansbrough, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HearUSA, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluations; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 9, 2004    /s/Stephen J. Hansbrough   Stephen J. Hansbrough    Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 24.3  
 

  SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC.  POWER OF ATTORNEY 

SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB

             The undersigned, in his capacity as a director of SI Diamond  Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), after reviewing the Company's Form 10-KSB,  does hereby appoint Douglas P. Baker, his true and lawful attorney to execute in his  name, place and stead, in his capacity as a Director of said Company, the  Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,  2001, and all instruments necessary or incidental in connection therewith,  including all amendments, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange  Commission. Said attorney shall have the full power and authority to do and  perform, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all  capacities, every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done in the  premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or  could do in person, the undersigned hereby ratifying and approving the acts of  said attorney.

             IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument this  13th day of March, 2002.

 

                                              /s/ David Sincox                                              David Sincox
Exhibit 10.1
 
  
   Bank Borrower
 Facility and Use of Proceeds Line of Credit Loan Expiration Date
 Letter of Credit Letters of Credit provided however Reimbursement
Agreement Application




---



##### 



Note Note
 Letter Agreement Loan Documents.
 Interest Rate
 Repayment
 Security
 Guarantor
  Covenants




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties
 Material Adverse
Change
   Material Adverse
Effect
   Fees




---



##### 



Expenses
 Depository
 Conditions to the Loan
          Conditions to Each Advance




---



##### 



Miscellaneous Notices




---



##### 



Very truly yours,
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:
    /s/ John BarthJohn Barth, Vice President   BORROWER:
BIOCLINICA, INC.By:
    /s/ Mark L. Weinstein (SEAL)Print Name:
    Mark L. WeinsteinTitle:
    President and CEOOXFORD BIO-IMAGING RESEARCH, INC.By:
    /s/ Ted  I. Kaminer (SEAL)Ted I. Kaminer, Vice PresidentBy:
    /s/ Maria KrausMaria Kraus, Assistant SecretaryGUARANTOR:
RED OAK RESEARCH, INC.By:
    /s/ Ted I. Kaminer (SEAL)Print Name:
    Ted I.  KaminerTitle:
    TreasurerBIOCLINICA ACQUISITION, INC.By:
    /s/ Ted I. Kaminer (SEAL)Print Name:
    Ted I. KaminerTitle:
    V.P. & Secretary




---



##### 



A. FINANCIAL REPORTING COVENANTS:
      Financial Statements GAAP
 B. FINANCIAL COVENANTS:
     EBITDA plus plus plus plus plus plus less plus less plus
 A-1




---



##### 



Interest Coverage Ratio divided
 Total Debt
  C. NEGATIVE COVENANTS:
 provided however
          A-2




---



##### 



A-3




---



##### 



ANNEX 1
 PRICING GRID
 LIBOR Rate MarginRatio of Total Debt
    
    and Letter of Credit
    
    
    
    Unused Fee on LineLevel
    
    to EBITDA
    
    Fee
    
    Base Rate Margin
    
    of CreditI
    
    Less than or equal
to 1.0 to 1
    
    175 basis points
(1.75%)
    
    75 basis points
(0.75%)
    
    25 basis pointsII
    
    Greater than 1.0 to
1 but less than or
equal to 2.0 to 1
    
    200 basis points
(2.0%)
    
    100 basis points
(1.0%)
    
    35 basis points
# State Flight Hours Breakdown

&"Arial,Bold"&14(District) BLM FY 2011 Aviation Stats	

# Sheet1
Bureau of Land Management

Fire Vehicle Driver Orientation (BL-300)

Driver must have a valid state driver’s license in their possession for appropriate vehicle class before operating the vehicle.

Student Evaluator

Printed Name Printed Name

Duty Station Duty Station

Task A* B* C* D*

Demonstrated knowledge of BLM Driving Policy per the Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire 

Aviation Operations.

Completed an initial driver walk around.

Demonstrated knowledge of completing a vehicle inspection utilizing the Fire Equipment 

Maintenance and Procedure Record (FEMPR) or equivalent. 

Demonstrated how to properly start up and shut down the vehicle.

• Ensured gauges are functioning properly.

• Allowed glow plugs to warm up.

• Ensured seat belts were worn.

• Performed driver adjustments.

• Released/engaged parking brake.

Demonstrated the following correct urban driving skills:

• Started and stopped the vehicle on a flat surface, incline, and decline.

• Merged with traffic.

• Controlled vehicle speed for various road and traffic conditions while using proper gears.

• Properly backed up the vehicle.

• Correctly parked the vehicle.

• Maneuvered in city traffic.

Demonstrated the following off-highway driving skills:

• Maneuvered along a two-track road.

• Maneuvered through washouts and draws.

• Maneuvered through rocky terrain utilizing a spotter.

• Maneuvered on rough, steep slopes, and side hills.

Maintained situational awareness.

• Utilized spotters.

• Established communication between spotter and driver.

• Accounted for personal safety.

• Utilized mirrors.

Discussed proper methods and procedures for maneuvering through streams, waterways, or standing 

water.

Demonstrated the ability to park and secure a vehicle at various locations; e.g., city/town, field 

environment, road shoulder, and work yard.

Discussed and demonstrated use of the S.T.O.P. procedure.

Discuss and demonstrated the use of the Operator Command Regeneration System (OCR), if 

equipped.

*Type of Vehicle Used:

A) <26,000 GVWR (list type): _______________________________________________

B) >26,000 GVWR (list type): _______________________________________________

C) Hummer (650)

D) Super Heavy (668)

Student Signature Date Evaluator Signature Date
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification**
I, Gino Chouinard, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HearUSA, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this l report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluations; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: May 10, 2004
/s/Gino ChouinardGino Chouinard
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alicia Lewie, Appellant.

Submitted July 12, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Matthew C. Hug, Esq., Rensselaer Technology Park, 105 Jordan Road, Troy, New York 12180 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.