alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NATIONAL INTERAGENCY FIRE CENTER

3833 South Development Avenue Boise ID 83705

DATE: March 1, 2024

TO: Agency Personnel

FROM: NIFC-Multi-Agency Coordinating Group

SUBJECT: 2024 National Interagency Standards for Resource Mobilization

Attached is the 2024 National Interagency Standards for Resource Mobilization, 

previously titled National Interagency Mobilization Guide. These standards are written 

to reflect the interagency needs of the user and formatted to accept local inserts.

The National Interagency Standards for Resource Mobilization states, references, or 

supplements policy and for Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service, U.S. 

Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, and Bureau of Indian Affairs.

The signatory agencies have directed the National Interagency Coordination Center 

(NICC) with review and oversight from the National Multi-Agency Coordinating 

Group (NMAC) to annually revise, publish, and distribute the National Interagency 

Standards for Resource Mobilization by March 1, and issue errata to this document.

The National Interagency Standards for Resource Mobilization establishes the 

standards for mobilization and demobilization of resources in response to wildland fire 

and all-hazard events. It is the foundational document instituting overarching processes 

for total mobility of resources.

Suggestions for modification of the publication can be submitted at any time during 

the calendar year. The NICC will accept suggestions for changes either through your 

signatory agency, through your Coordination Center (GACC), or through established 

interagency organizations such as NWCG Committees, recognized interagency groups 

(CGAC, ICAC, etc.), and functional areas (NIICD, RAWS, etc.).

The NICC will present all recommended changes to NMAC for their final acceptance 

and approval. Explanation of the modification process, instructions on how to submit 

changes, and the change request form are located on the NICC website located at 

https://www.nifc.gov/nicc/mobguide/index.html
Grant Beebe

Assistant Director Fire and Aviation Operations

Fire and Aviation Directorate Management

Bureau of Land Management – NIFC

David Haston

Assistant Director Fire and Aviation

USDA Forest Service – NIFC

Greg Smith

Fire Director

National Association of State Foresters – NIFC

Joshua Simmons

Director of Fire Operations

Bureau of Indian Affairs – NIFC

Ed Christopher

Chief, Branch of Fire Management Program Leader

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services – NIFC

Jason Fallon

Chief, Branch of Wildland Fire

National Park Service – NIFC

Aitor Bidaburu

Department of Homeland Security

U.S. Fire Administration

Fire Program Specialist – NIFC
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.33-86090, 333-13355, 333-49355, 333-87855 and 333-117243) pertaining to the Rent-Way, Inc. StockOption Plan and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-116635, 333-107022 and 333-102525) of Rent-Way, Inc. of ourreport dated December 23, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Rent-Way,Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2003./s/Malin, Bergquist & Company, LLPErie,PADecember 27, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Cash Distribution Fund V, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2009                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                                                  
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                            
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and
will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements No. 333-83682, 333-137129 and 333-139821 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 27, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of ManTech International
Corporation (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Companys adoption of a new standard for accounting for uncertain income tax positions), and the effectiveness of ManTech
International Corporations internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ManTech International Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|                         
|McLean, Virginia         
|February 27, 2009
**Procedural Briefing for Responding to a Downed SEAT Aircraft**

***The pilot should discuss the following items when briefing ground personnel about responding to a downed SEAT on an incident or airport:***

· The **ONLY** reason to approach a downed SEAT is to preserve life. 

· **ONLY** Approach the aircraft after all moving parts have stopped moving.

· Approach the aircraft with the wind at your back and make every effort to avoid any smoke fumes, there is the possibility that some may be toxic.

· If the aircraft comes to rest on a slope, always approach from the uphill side as the aircraft fuselage may shift and move downhill.

· SEATs have doors on both sides of the aircraft that may be used to allow the pilot to exit.  

· Demonstrate how the door latches work both from the outside and from the inside of the cockpit. Discuss alternate procedures or methods of gaining entry to the aircraft if the doors do not work, or the aircraft is inverted.

· Identify the location of the fuel and battery switches, and demonstrate how to turn them to the OFF position.

· Identify the location of the fire extinguisher inside the cockpit. Describe it’s use, in case it needs to be used in an emergency

· Identify the location of the aircraft fuel tanks (wings).

· Identify the type and flammability characteristics of the fuel on board (Jet-a or Av-Gas).  Identify the location of any areas that may be potential “hot areas”, or areas prone to ignition if fuel leaks are present.

· Demonstrate how the seat belt release works.  If the pilot needs to be cut out of their seat belt, try to cut the belt in the thinnest part of the material.  If the pilot is hanging inverted by the seat belt/shoulder harness, make sure they will be protected from any further injury when the seat belt is cut.

· Identify the location and use of the seat belt cutter if the pilot has one.

· The pilot may still have a flight helmet on when rescue personnel arrive on scene.  Try to keep the helmet on the pilot while they exit the aircraft.  Depending on the exit path and openings, it may be necessary to remove the pilot’s helmet.  Demonstrate how to unhook the helmet communication plug from the cord.  

· Help assist the pilot in getting as far away from the aircraft as practicable, to an area that is upwind from the crash site.

· Try to secure the site and be prepared to document as many details about the incident as possible.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual Initiatives Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, March 12, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 488-3557.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Multi-Lingual Initiatives Issue Committee will be held Thursday, March 12, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time. You can submit written comments to the panel by faxing to (718) 488-2062, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, 10 Metro Tech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     Public comments will also be welcome during the meeting. Please contact Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 488-3557 for additional information.                

The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

Dated: January 13, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E9-1330 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7810

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SALVATORE COTTONE, a/k/a Sal,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (CR-89-102)

Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: June 14, 2004

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Salvatore Cottone, Appellant Pro Se. Justin W. Williams, Assistant

United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Salvatore Cottone seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion that the court construed as a

successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be

taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Cottone has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 11a0647n.06

No. 09-2212

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JOHN TYLER McKINNEY, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE EASTERN

DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

O P I N I O N

BEFORE: NORRIS, GIBBONS, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Defendant John McKinney, Sr., pleaded guilty to one count of distributing

five or more grams of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). His plea agreement preserved

his right to appeal a penalty enhancement that he received for a prior felony drug offense. He also

contends that the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (“FSA”), Pub. L. No. 111-220, 124 Stat. 2372 (Aug.

3, 2010), should be applied retroactively to his sentence.

The panel has had the opportunity to consider the arguments advanced by the parties and to

conduct our own independent review of the record on appeal. In this case, the district court entered

an Order on April 29, 2009, which explains in detail why defendant’s prior conviction in Michigan

state court for possession of dihydrocodeinone qualifies as a prior “felony drug offense” under 21

U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B). We agree with the reasoning of the district court and affirm on that basis. 

With respect to the second issue raised by defendant, a prior panel of this court has decided 

that the FSA does not apply retroactively to cases on direct appeal. United States v. Carradine, 621
No. 09-2212

United States v. McKinney

F.3d 575 (6th Cir. 2010). A panel of this court cannot overrule a published decision of another

panel. Salmi v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 774 F.2d 685, 689 (6th Cir. 1985). Defendant

recognizes that Carradine is controlling authority but raises the issue to preserve it for possible en

banc review, which he is entitled to pursue.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

- 2 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS AMENDED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF AMETEK, INC. AT JUNE 30, 1995,
AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME OF AMETEK, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                          16,905
<SECURITIES>                                     8,462
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,870
<INVENTORY>                                    109,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               285,945
<PP&E>                                         387,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                 218,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 554,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          235,857
<BONDS>                                        185,506
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           357
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   554,060
<SALES>                                        430,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               430,638
<CGS>                                          331,396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  331,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,970
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,210
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,132
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,078
<DISCONTINUED>                                  11,199
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,277
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.66**

**FRESH CHOICE, INC.**

**2004 HOME OFFICE INCENTIVE PLAN**

**Purpose: **Toreward Home Office management for accomplishments resulting in meeting orexceeding certain before tax earnings targets of the Company.

**Eligibility: **Officers and Department Managersdesignated as Directors of the Company who are actively employed by FreshChoice on December 29, 2003.  Thosehired after December 29, 2003 will participate at a pro-rated amount unlessother arrangements have been made. Participants must be employed by Fresh Choice on the last day of theplan year; incentive pay is not earned until that date.  **Participants are only eligible to receive incentivepay if the Company meets or exceeds minimum before tax earnings targets.  See attached schedule.   The 2003 minimum before tax earningstargets include the expense of this program. **

**Plan Year: **Theplan begins on December 29, 2003 and ends on December 26, 2004.

**Incentive Pay Available: **The incentive pay available is a percentage of theparticipant’s base salary as of December 29, 2003.  The bonus pool, if any, is allocated among the designatedparticipants based on Company performance using a predetermined percentageamount.  See attached schedule.  Actual bonus paid is interpolated accordingto actual results.

The Chief ExecutiveOfficer’s incentive pay, based upon achievement of before-tax earnings targets,is adjusted based upon sales results versus targets.

**SPECIALCIRCUMSTANCES: **Beforetax earnings and sales targets will be adjusted as appropriate for anyrestaurant closures or lease re-negotiations during the plan year.  Additional discretionary incentive pay maybe paid at the recommendation of the compensation committee and approved by thefull board of directors.

**Distribution of Incentive Pay: **Incentive pay will be paid as soon as practicalafter year-end financials are audited, provided that the Company met orexceeded defined levels of performance. 

**Plan Intent:** Fresh Choice intends to maintain the plan under the terms listedabove.  However, Fresh Choice reservesthe right to modify or terminate the plan at any time.

----
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION

CHAIR’S NOTICE – Chairman E. Sequoyah Simermeyer

Visit www.NIGC.gov to learn more about the NIGC 3 For 35 Project— a 

year-long project emphasizing the importance of conversations among 

the tribal gaming regulatory community about workforce preparedness.

Today, August 10th, the National Indian Gaming Commission

announced the Indian Gaming industry’s gross gaming revenue 

report for fiscal year 2021. I was happy to be joined by the 

NIGC Vice Chair and NIGC leadership team as I made the 

announcement at the Oklahoma Indian Gaming Association’s 

conference in Tulsa, Oklahoma. I want to say a special thank you 

to the NIGC CFO Yvonne Lee who spearheaded bringing together the 

independently audited gaming operation revenue data to produce 

the NIGC report and analysis.

Last year’s Indian gaming gross revenue was a record $39 

billion. This marked a significant increase over the prior 

fiscal year, which showed a record decline due to the historic 

closures across Indian Gaming because of the pandemic. It was 

also an increase over all pre-pandemic years’ revenues, an 

indication of the Indian gaming industry’s strength and 

resilience.

Indian Gaming is licensed by 248 Tribes at over 500 gaming 

casinos and operations on Indian land in 29 states. Indian 

Gaming is unique when compared to other parts of the gaming 

industry:

 Its regulatory framework is inter-jurisdictional and 

includes a federal regulatory body.

 Specific statutes limit how Tribal governments can use 

gaming revenues.

 Federal courts have affirmed Indian Gaming as governmental 

enterprise.

I was grateful to the Oklahoma Indian Gaming Association’s 

Chairman, Matthew Morgan, and to the organization’s executive 

director, Sheila Morago, for the opportunity to make this 

important announcement in the heart of Indian country and an 

area with a long history of Indian gaming.

Additional information about the gross gaming revenue report and 

NIGC analysis are available on the NIGC website at www.NIGC.gov. 

###