alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PIMCO
ADVISORS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          41,398
<SECURITIES>                                    12,899
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,070
<PP&E>                                          10,567 <F1> 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 350,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,919
<BONDS>                                              0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       295,507 <F2>
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,244) <F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   350,060 
<SALES>                                              0 <F4>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,306 <F5>
<CGS>                                                0 <F4>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,154 <F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,002 <F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,742
<INCOME-TAX>                                       553
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,189
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,189
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32 <F8>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27 <F9>
        
<FN>
<F1> Net of accumulated depreciation and amortization.
<F2> Entity is a partnership.  Amount shown represents Partners' Capital.
<F3> Amount shown comprises Unamortized Compensation.
<F4> The partnership is in the service business and has no sales or cost of
     goods sold of tangible products.
<F5> Amount shown comprises revenues from services.
<F6> Amount shown comprises costs of services.
<F7> Amount shown is from amortization of intangible assets.
<F8> Amount shown is for the Partnership's General Partner and Class A Limited
     Partner Units.
<F9> Amount is for the Partnership's Class B Limited Partner Units.
</FN>

</TABLE>
EX-10.2


  Exhibit 10.2

  March 30, 2022

   

  Dear Jandy:

   

  We are delighted that you have agreed to enhance the contributions you will make with us.

   

  In your role of Interim Chief Financial Officer, you will report to Alex Vetter, CEO. The effective date of this change will be April 1, 2022. Your annualized base compensation in this exempt position will remain $301,601.28 (salary effective April 1, 2022), and you will additionally receive a monthly salary enhancement bonus of $28,811 payable in the second payroll each month. This salary enhancement bonus shall be payable to you for nine months, or through December 31, 2022.

   

  If a permanent Chief Financial Officer is hired in the period between April 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022, any unpaid salary enhancement bonus from this same period shall become payable to you in a lump sum, payable in the first payroll cycle following the Chief Financial Officer’s date of hire. If you remain in role beyond this period, the monthly salary enhancement will continue until the role is filled.

   

  In addition to the salary enhancement bonus, you will receive a one-time cash bonus of $129,650 paid effective the first payroll following your start date in the position.

   

  You are also eligible to receive a special equity grant in the amount of $111,050. This special RSU grant will have a one-year vesting period. The number of RSUs you receive will be rounded to the nearest whole share based on the closing price of Cars.com stock on the grant date. This grant is not official until it is formally authorized by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors in its sole discretion, which we anticipate being quickly following start date.

   

  Combined, these compensation elements augment by $500,000 your current salary, STIP, and LTIP. Congratulations and thank you for your ongoing and continued contributions to the success of CARS.

   

  D.V. Williams Chief HR Officer CARS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bruce Sweeper, Appellant.

Submitted July 12, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
______________________________________________________________________________ 

__________________________________________________________________________________________ 

NFES ITEM INTRODUCTION FORM 

NFES NUMBER: _______________ 

DESCRIPTION: _________________________________________________________ 

UNIT OF ISSUE: _______ STD PK: ______________ ITEM COST: _____________ 

LBS: _________ OZS: __________ SHELF LIFE: ________ MSDS_______ (attach info) 

KIT ITEM: Y / N HAZ MAT: Y / N ( if yes, attach hazardous material information) 

CONSUMABLE / DURABLE (circle one) 

REFURB ITEM: Y / N (if yes, attach refurb information) 

****************************************************************************** 

SOURCE OF SUPPLY: ( federal source of supply requires NSN) 

VENDOR: ___________________________________ VENDOR: ___________________________________ 

ADDRESS: __________________________________ ADDRESS: __________________________________

 __________________________________ _________________________________ 

PHONE: ____________________________________ PHONE: ___________________________________ 

FAX: ____________________________________ FAX: ____________________________________ 

VENDOR ITEM #: ___________________________ VENDOR ITEM #: __________________________ 

NSN: ______________________________________ NSN: ______________________________________ 

ADDITIONAL ITEM COMMENTS: ____________________________________________________________ 

******************************************************************************************** 

REQUESTED BY: _____________________ CACHE: ____________ DATE: ____________ 

NFES NUMBER ASSIGNED BY: __________________________ DATE: ________________ 

NFES CHAIRPERSON: ___________________________________DATE: ________________
[EXHIBIT 10.3(a)]
              [FIRST AMENDMENT TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT, ITOLUR]

Translation No. 20/2002 - MODIFICATION OF THE PROMISE OF SALE OF
SHARES.

In the city of Montevideo, this October 1st, 2002, there appear Mr. Fernando
Cesar ALVARES BUZIO, Uruguayan, of legal age, holder of I.D. Card number
_.___.___-, married in first and only marriage with Veronica Raffo, and Mr.
Carlos Manuel GURMENDEZ MARQUEZ, Uruguayan, of legal age, holder of I.D. Card
number _.___.___-_, married in first and only marriage with Cecilia Carluccio,
establishing their domicile for these proceedings at 879 Franzini Street, suite
703 of this. city, as party of the first part, and ITOLUR SOCIEDAD ANONIMA, an
authorized legal entity, registered with the Tax Payers- Sole Register under
number 21.460.410.0011, domiciled at 3328 Miguel Barreiro Street, suite 101, and
establishing domicile for these proceedings at 954 Colonia Street, Suite 203,
both domiciles of this city, being represented in these proceeding by a special
attorney Mr. Sebastian Urriza Olague, holder of I.D. Card number _.___.___-_, as
party of the second part, and they agree to the following provisions: FIRST; On
August 22nd, 2002, the appearers promised to execute an agreement of sell of
shares of the company DONIMAR SOCIEDAD ANONIMA.- On said document, the parties
agreed that the term of payment of the agreed price should be 25 days counting
as from that date.- SECOND: The parties agree to modify said promise, but only
the part regarding the manner of payment of the agreed price; the modification
being the following: three













<PAGE>


consecutive and monthly installments of the same amount, US$ 2.666 each. The
first installment shall be due on October 15th, 2002. The definite contract
shall be executed upon the payment of the third installment.- THIRD; ITOLUR S.A.
has already paid to the selling party the amount of US$ 7.500 corresponding to
the first check bound to cover in the thirteenth provision of said promise. The
other amounts shall be paid by Itolur S.A to the selling party in some of the
ways established in said thirteenth provision.

In certification and confirmation of the above we execute and sign these
presents in three copies of the same tenor.

/There appear three illegible signatures/

The undersigned Public Translator declares the foregoing -the copy of which is
registered under her private file under No. 20/2002 - to be a faithful and
complete translation, into English of the original document (MODIFICATION OF THE
PROMISE OF SALE OF SHARES), written in Spanish, attached hereto. Montevideo,
November 5th, 2002. ------- Natalia Pereira /s/, Public Translator




















<PAGE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-16927

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 3, 2006.

Alexander Diaz, Marianna, FL, pro se.

Karin B. Hoppmann, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before BLACK, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Diaz appeals, pro se, the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence. Diaz was sentenced to 270 months’ imprisonment after pleading guilty to the following three counts of a five-count, superseding indictment: (1) conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)® (Count One); (2) carrying a firearm during a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)® (Count Three); and (3) possession of a firearm by a convicted felon as an armed career criminal, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(e)(1) (Count Five). In his § 3582(c)(2) motion to the district court, Diaz requested the court to reduce his sentence pursuant to Amendments 489 and 591 of the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court denied the motion because Amendments 489 and 591 were in effect at the time of sentencing and, therefore, the court lacked jurisdiction to consider Diaz’s claim under § 3582(c)(2). We affirm.

Section 3582(c)(2) is applicable “in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o).” The Sentencing Commission promulgated Amendment 489 effective November 1, 1993, and Amendment 591 effective No*950vember 1, 2000. *See*U.S.S.G. app. C, amends. 489, 591 (2001). The district court did not err in finding it lacked jurisdiction to review Diaz’s § 3582(c) motion because both amendments were in effect on Diaz’s January 22, 2002, sentencing date and had already been incorporated into the November 1, 2001, Guidelines used by the sentencing court. Thus, Diaz was not a defendant “sentenced based on a sentencing range that was *subsequently*lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(o).” *See United States v. Bravo,*203 F.3d 778, 780 (11th Cir.2000) (emphasis added). Additionally, although Diaz does not argue any alternative basis for jurisdiction, because of his pro se status, the district court executed a thorough analysis of potential bases of jurisdiction available to Diaz. We conclude the district court did not err in determining that no other statute or rule applied to Diaz’s claim. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of Diaz’s § 3582(c) motion.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    C. Kirk Peacock               
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | C. Kirk Peacock                      
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
# Drill #9

&"Times New Roman,Bold"Portable Pump Exercise		&"Times New Roman,Bold"Drill #9

&P	

&P	

# Code Page

# image1.png
#### WALKER v. BIGGS et al. PILGRIM v. SAME.

Nos. 459, 402.

District Court, E. D. Tennessee, S. D.

July 2, 1946.

See also 2 F.R.D. 493.

John S. Wrinkle, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for plaintiffs.

Williams & Williams, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for defendants.

DARR, District Judge.

The defendants have motions to consolidate the causes. The questions being the same, one memorandum will suffice. The authority to consolidate is contained in Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. This Rule modifies the statute which is codified at 28 U.S.C.A. § 734.

Rule 42(a) extends, or at least clarifies, the authority by providing that actions involving “a common question of law or fact” may be consolidated.

These suits involve common questions of law and fact.' In reality the suits are based upon the same causes of action, the only difference appearing to be the allegations of the extent of the alleged wrongdoing.

Consolidation of actions is a matter within the discretion of the Court.

As I understand counsel for the plaintiffs, the insistence is made that the plaintiff Pilgrim was a boy of eighteen without criminal record at the time of the alleged wrongdoing, while the plaintiff Walker was a mature man with a criminal record. Hence, it is argued that to require the Pilgrim case to be tried with the Walker case would tend to prejudice the jury against Pilgrim.

I cannot accede to this view. If the Pilgrim case were tried separately, proof would be admissible as to his association with Walker and practically the same proof in connection with this phase of the case would go to the jury.

My experience has been that juries are much better able to evaluate situations than is thought by some. I believe that a jury could try these cases together in fairness to all concerned and thereby save much time and expense.

The motion to consolidate is granted.

So ordered.
**EXHIBIT23.2**

**INDEPENDENTAUDITORS’ CONSENT**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-59118, 33-81336,333-19993, 333-46789, and 333-71588 of Fresh Choice, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form S-8 of ourreport dated February 14, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s adoption of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” andNo. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”) relating to the consolidated statements ofthe Company at December 29, 2002 and for each of the two fiscal years in the period ended December 29, 2002,appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003.

/s/ Deloitte & ToucheLLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Bio-Imaging
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Mark L. Weinstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bio-Imaging
Technologies, Inc.

                                /s/ Mark L. Weinstein*
                                --------------------------------------
Dated: May 14, 2003             Mark L. Weinstein, President and Chief
                                Executive Officer
                                (Principal Executive Officer)

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY 2 OF NEW MEXICO, a New Mexico 3 Corporation, 4 Plaintiff-Appellee, 5

v. NO. 28,959 6 RANCHO VISTA DEVELOPMENT, 7 LLC, a New Mexico Limited Liability 8 Company, 9 Defendant-Appellant. 10

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 11 Louis P. McDonald, District Judge 12

Keleher & McLeod PA 13 Thomas A. Domme 14 Albuquerque, NM 15 Miller Stratvert PA 16 Kirk R. Allen 17 Albuquerque, NM 18 for Appellee 19 Rudolph B. Chavez 20 Albuquerque, NM 21 for Appellant 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION 232 CASTILLO, Judge. 1 In this Court’s notice of proposed summary disposition, we proposed to dismiss 2 Rancho Vista Development’s appeal as premature. Rancho Vista Development did 3 not file a memorandum in opposition to this Court’s proposed disposition, and the 4 time to do so has passed. Instead, Rancho Vista Development sent a letter to this 5 Court, informing the Court that Rancho Vista Development did not intent to pursue 6 its appeal. Rancho Vista Development did not, however, file a voluntary dismissal 7 agreement with this Court pursuant toRule 12-401(B) NMRA. Therefore, we now 8 dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary 9 disposition. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11

________________________________ 12 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge 13 WE CONCUR: 14

________________________________ 15 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 16

________________________________ 17 ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge 18
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 106 (Thursday, June 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13029]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 11750 and <greek-i> 11751]


West Virginia Disaster Number WV-00012

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-1838-DR), dated 05/
15/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Mudslides, and Landslides.
    Incident Period: 05/03/2009 and continuing.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/27/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/14/2009.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/15/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of West Virginia, dated 05/15/2009 is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): 
Mcdowell; Raleigh.
Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    West Virginia: Fayette; Kanawha; Summers.
    Virginia: Tazewell.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Roger B. Garland,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-13029 Filed 6-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
---

---

EXHIBIT 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation  by
reference in the  Registration  Statements  on Form S-8  Registration  No. 33-71822 and
Form F-3 (Nos.  333-112136,  333-121611 and  333-126416) of our report dated March 30,
2006,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of LanOptics  Ltd.
 included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.

| |  | /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer 
Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer A Member of Ernst & Young Global
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 30, 2006Tel Aviv,
Israel



---

---
##### 



Exhibit 1.

|     |  |                                                                                                         |  |                                                          
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|kpmg |  |                                                                                                         |  |                                                          
|     |  | KPMGLLPChartered Accountants
Yonge Corporate Centre
4100 Yonge Street, Suite 200
North York, ON M2P 2H3 |  | Telephone (416)228-7000
Telefax (416)228-7123
www.kpmg.ca

AUDITORS CONSENT

To the Board of Directors
Masonite International Corporation

We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of (i) our audit
report dated February 13, 2003 on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of Masonite
International Corporation as at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the
Consolidated Statements of Income, Retained Earnings and Cash Flows for the
years then ended, and (ii) our Comments by Auditors for U.S. Readers on
Canada-U.S. Reporting Difference dated February 13, 2003.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Toronto, Canada
February 13, 2003