alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James WILKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant R. CONNER; W.J. Townley, Superintendent; Correctional Officer Barbour; Ms. Cheeks, Food Services Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees, and Warden Halifax C.C.; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendants.

No. 06-6127.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 2006.

Decided: June 29, 2006.

James Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. Noelle Leigh Shaw-Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James Wilkins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Wilkins v. Conner,*No. l:03-ev-00815-JCC (E.D.Va. Dec. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
 

Fire and Aviation
 

3833 South Development Avenue 

Boise, ID 83705-5354 

In Reply Refer to: 

1400-850 (FA-220) 

Memorandum 

To: All New Employees 

From: Human Resources Office 

Subject: Unemployment Compensation Requirements 

The Washington Office has advised us to inform all new employees about unemployment 

compensation entitlements. If you are currently receiving unemployment compensation your 

entitlement should stop the day before your effective date of hire. Entitlement does not extend to 

the date of your first pay check regardless of when the pay check is received. Filing for 

unemployment while you are employed constitutes a fraudulent claim which could lead to a 

$1,000 fine or imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or both. 

If you have questions regarding unemployment entitlements please contact the Human Resources 

Office at extension 5523. 

PM-03 (08/02)
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Echo Westley Dixon, Appellant, v D. Rock, as Superintendent of Upstate Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Submitted October 12, 2010;

decided November 30, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7575

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARSON DARRELL RODGERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 06-6576

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARSON DARRELL RODGERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior

District Judge. (1:02-cr-00374-WLO; 1:04-cv-00498)

Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: September 28, 2006
- 2 -

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carson Darrell Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Carson Darrell Rodgers

seeks to appeal the district court’s orders adopting the

recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and subsequent motion to reopen

judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). These orders are not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Rodgers has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Rodgers’ motions for

certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 273 

AN ACT 

To require the designation of the federally occupied building 

located at McKinley Avenue and Third Street, S.W., 

Canton, Ohio, as the ‘‘Ralph Regula Federal Office 

Building and Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 273 ES

1 SECTION 1. RALPH REGULA FEDERAL OFFICE BUILDING 

2 AND COURTHOUSE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Administrator of General 

4 Services shall ensure that the federally occupied building 

5 located at McKinley Avenue and Third Street, S.W., Can6 ton, Ohio, is known and designated as the ‘‘Ralph Regula 

7 Federal Office Building and Courthouse’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—During the period in which the 

9 building referred to in subsection (a) is federally occupied, 

10 any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

11 or other record of the United States to that building shall 

12 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ralph Regula Federal 

13 Office Building and Courthouse’’. 

Passed the Senate January 15, 2009. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 273 

AN ACT 

To require the designation of the federally occupied 

ula Federal Office Building and Courthouse’’. Street, S.W., Canton, Ohio, as the ‘‘Ralph Regbuilding located at McKinley Avenue and Third
No. 805.

#### Cudahy Packing Co. *v.*Holland, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, U. S. Department of Labor.

March 9, 1942.

*Mr. William C. Green*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Fahy*for respondent.

*Per Curiam:*

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed on the authority of *Cudahy Packing Co. v. Holland, ante,*p. 357. Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
 CALCULATION OF THE MAXIMUM NOTES BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2005
UNDER THE SENIOR SECURED NOTES FACILITY DATED JANUARY 13, 2005
 I. Lesser of:A. the product of:1. the Free Cash Flow Multiple
    
    
    9.5xMultiplied by2. Services Business Free Cash Flow
    
    $
    5,481$
    52,070OrB. the product of:x. 2.0 times
    
    
    2.0xmultiplied byy. Services Business Revenue
    
    $
    16,595$
    33,191II. Lesser of1. 50% of the results of the immediately preceding clause (I)
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    16,595Or2. 30% of the Companys After-tax PV10
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    7,114III. 10% of the Companys After-tax PV10
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    2,371Maximum Notes Balance = (I) + (II) + (III)
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    42,676Aggregate Notes Outstanding at Determination Date
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    30,000Companys After-tax PV10 as of 12/31/04
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    23,712Services Business Revenue {Section 2(a)(xxxx)}
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    16,595Services Business operating income
    
    $
    4,106Services Business depreciation and amortization expense
    
    
    1,375Less: Any net operating income from affiliates
    
    
    (A) Services Business net operating income before interest,
taxes,
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    5,481(B) Aggregate interest paid on permitted indebtedness
    
    
    
    
    
    
    340Services Business capital expenditures
    
    $
    3,224Less: Issuances of stock by Infinity, less costs
    
    
    (9,265
    )0Less: Aggregate interest expense
    
    
    (340
    )Services Business capital expenditures, not funded
    
    
    (340
    )
    
    
    (340
    )Services Free Cash Flow {Section 2(a)(xxxix)}
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    5,481
 34
2008 Compensation Information for Named Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.43 
 2008 COMPENSATION INFORMATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
 The table below provides information regarding the 2008
annual base salary for each named executive officer of Kosan Biosciences Incorporated (the “Company”). Also listed in the table below are the target cash bonus amounts for each of the Company’s named executive officer under the
Company’s 2008 Executive Officer Cash Bonus Plan. 
  

						
	 Named Executive Officer
	  	 2008 Annual
 Base
 Salary
	  	 2008 Target
 Cash Bonus
Amount(1)(2)
	 
	 Robert G. Johnson, Jr., M.D., Ph.D.
 President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	430,000	  	45	%
	 Gary S. Titus
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	322,000	  	35	%
	 Peter J. Licari, Ph.D.
 Senior Vice President, Manufacturing and Operations
	  	270,000	  	35	%
	 Pieter B.M.W.M. Timmermans, Ph.D.
 Senior Vice President, Drug Discovery and Preclinical Research
	  	270,000	  	35	%



	(1)	Each target cash bonus amount is expressed as a percentage of the respective named executive officer’s 2008 annual base salary. 

  

	(2)	Target cash bonus amounts are based on 100% achievement of corporate objectives and, if applicable, individual performance objectives. Actual bonus payments (if any) may
represent a higher or lower percentage of the named executive officer’s 2008 annual base salary, depending on the extent to which actual performance meets, exceeds or falls short of the specified corporate objectives and applicable
individual performance objectives, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.
MB Software Corporation - Exhibit 10.2




  













2







3







4







5







6







7







8







9







10







11







A-1







C-1







B-2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-8911-1]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the Stakeholder Briefing of the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU). This meeting will deal with matters relative to Regional Haze and visibility improvement in Federal Class I areas within MANE-VU.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on June 10, 2009 starting at 1 p.m. (EDT).

*Location:*                         Holiday Inn BWI Airport, 890 Elkridge Landing Road, Linthicum, MD 21090; (410) 859-8400.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For questions regarding meeting specifics, documents and press inquiries contact: Kromeklia Bryant, Ozone Transport Commission, 444 North Capitol Street, NW., Suite 638, Washington, DC 20001; (202) 508-3840; e-mail:                         *ozone@otcair.org;*                         Web site:                         *http://www.manevu.org.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU) was formed in 2001, in response to EPA's issuance of the Regional Haze rule. MANE-VU's members include: Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, the Penobscot Indian Nation, the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe along with EPA and Federal Land Managers.

*Type of Meeting:*                     This meeting will be open to the public.                

*Agenda:*                     Copies of the final agenda are available from the OTC office (202) 508-3840; by e-mail:                     *ozone@otcair.org*                     or via the MANE-VU Web site at                     *http://www.manevu.org*.                

Dated: May 21, 2009.

William C. Early,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

[FR Doc. E9-12552 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, John A. Poserina,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Synergx  Systems certify
that:

       1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Synergx
Systems Inc.;

       2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

       3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

        4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

        a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period cover by this report based on such evaluation; and

        c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

       5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

        a) All significant deficiencies in material weakness the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:    August 12, 2005
         /S/ John A. Poserina
         John A. Poserina
         Chief Financial Officer
18 USC Sec. 1166

TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 

PART I - CRIMES 

CHAPTER 53 - INDIANS 

 

Sec. 1166. Gambling in Indian country 

(a) Subject to subsection (c), for purposes of Federal law, allState laws pertaining to the licensing, regulation, or 

prohibition of gambling, including but not limited to criminal sanctions applicable thereto, shall apply in Indian 

country in the same manner and to the same extent as such laws apply elsewhere in the State. 

(b) Whoever in Indian country is guilty of any act or omission involving gambling, whether or not conducted or 

sanctioned by an Indian tribe, which, although not made punishable by any enactment of Congress, would be 

punishable if committed or omitted within the jurisdiction of the State in which the act or omission occurred, 

under the laws governing the licensing, regulation, or prohibition of gambling in force at the time of such act or 

omission, shall be guilty of a like offense and subject to a like punishment. 

(c) For the purpose of this section, the term ''gambling'' does not include - 

(1) class I gaming or class II gaming regulated by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, or 

(2) class III gaming conducted under a Tribal-State compact approved by the Secretary of the Interior under 

section 11(d)(8)of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act that is in effect. 

(d) The United States shall have exclusive jurisdiction over criminal prosecutions of violations of State 

gambling laws that are made applicable under this section to Indian country, unless an Indian tribe pursuant to a 

Tribal-State compact approved by the Secretary of the Interior under section 11(d)(8) of the Indian Gaming 

Regulatory Act, or under any other provision of Federal law, has consented to the transfer to the State of 

criminal jurisdiction with respect to gambling on the lands of the Indian tribe. 

(Added Pub. L. 100-497, Sec. 23, Oct. 17, 1988 , 102 Stat. 2487.) 

REFERENCES IN TEXT 

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L. 100-497, Oct. 17, 1988 , 102 Stat. 

2467, which enacted sections 1166 to 1168 of this title and chapter 25 (Sec. 2701 et seq.) of Title 25, Indians. 

Section 11(d)(8) of such Act is classified to section 2710(d)(8) of Title 25. For complete classification of this 

Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2701 of Title 25 and Tables.
NAL I
49° No,

D5
ss Vs
“On

mate)
Ne comm?
September 4, 2013

D. Scott Colbert

Gaming Commissioner
Chickasaw Nation

902 Arlington, PMB 228
Ada, Oklahoma 74821

Re: Application to use alternate standards, 25 C.F.R. § 543.5
Dear Mr. Colbert:
Thank you for submitting alternate minimum standards and supporting

documentation regarding blind counts in the vault. I have reviewed the standards
and determined that they achieve the level of security and integrity intended by the

standards they are meant to replace.! Therefore, I approve the continued use of the
alternate standards.

Thank you for your application. If you have any questions, please contact
Staff Attorney Jennifer Ward at 202-632-7003.

Sincerely,

Num

Tracie L. Stevens
Chairwoman

125 CFR § 543.17(f)(14)(iv) and 25 CFR § 543.17(g)(16) (iv)

NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS 1441 L St. NW, Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005 Tel: 202.632.7003 Fax: 202.632.7066 + WWW.NIGC.GoV

REGIONAL OFFICES Portland, OR; Sacramento, CA; Phoenix, AZ; St. Paul, MN; Tulsa, OK
AVISO A TODOS LOS EMPLEADOS Y SOLICITANTES

De acuerdo con la regulación de la Comisión de Igualdad de Oportunidades 

de Empleo (EEOC, por sus siglas en inglés), Título 29 del Código de 

Regulaciones Federales (CFR, por sus siglas en inglés) Parte 1614, se aplican 

los siguientes procedimientos:

Cualquier empleado o solicitante de empleo que crea que ha sido 

discriminado en base a su raza, color, religión, origen nacional, sexo, edad (40 

años o más), discapacidad mental o física, orientación sexual, información 

genética, estado civil, estado de paternidad o represalias por haber 

participado en una actividad de EEO protegida DEBE contactar a un 

Consejero de EEO e iniciar asesoramiento informal antes de presentar una 

Queja Formal de Discriminación.

Una persona agraviada DEBE iniciar contacto con un Consejero de EEO 

dentro de los 45 días a partir de la fecha del asunto supuestamente 

discriminatorio o, en el caso de una acción de personal, dentro de los 45 días

a partir de la fecha efectiva de la acción.

Una vez iniciado el asesoramiento informal, el Consejero de EEO tiene 30 

días para realizar una investigación informal sobre el asunto e intentar una 

resolución. El período de asesoramiento de 30 días puede extenderse por 60 

días adicionales: 1) cuando la persona acepta tal extensión por escrito; o 2) 

cuando la persona agraviada elige participar en un procedimiento de 

Resolución Alternativa de Disputas.

Departamento del Mantenimiento de Tierras 

Fuego y Aviación 

Programa de Igualdad de Oportunidades de Empleo

3833 South Development Avenue

Boise, Idaho 83705

208-387-5454