alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         213,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,109,177
<ALLOWANCES>                                    48,708
<INVENTORY>                                  1,557,257
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,597,380
<PP&E>                                       1,426,367
<DEPRECIATION>                                 865,466
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,279,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,447,994
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,472,357
<OTHER-SE>                                   (665,687)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,279,519
<SALES>                                     10,606,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,606,235
<CGS>                                        6,485,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,480,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,050,624
<INCOME-TAX>                                   251,105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            799,519
<DISCONTINUED>                             (2,085,480)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (26,246)
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,312,207)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.76)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 204 (Friday, October 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 54836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25591]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Interventions for Substance Abuse.
    Date: October 28, 2009.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Michael Micklin, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3136, MSC 7759, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
1258, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5d30343e36313433301d3e2e2f73333435733a322b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97fafef4fcfbfef9fad7f4e4e5b9f9feffb9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 19, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-25591 Filed 10-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2704 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Orange 74. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself and Mr. REED) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Orange 74. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT ORANGE 74. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Naphthalenecarboxamide, 

N-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-[2-[2,5- 

dichloro-4- 

[(dimethylamino)sulfonyl]phenyl]diazenyl]-3- 

hydroxy- (CAS No. 85776– 

14–3) (provided for in subheading 3204.17.60) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2704 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2888 

To amend section 205 of title 18, United States Code, to exempt qualifying 

law school students participating in legal clinics from the application 

of the general conflict of interest rules under such section. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. CARDIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 205 of title 18, United States Code, to 

exempt qualifying law school students participating in 

legal clinics from the application of the general conflict 

of interest rules under such section. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Law Student Clinic 

5 Participation Act of 2009’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2888 IS

1 SEC. 2. LAW STUDENT AND LEGAL CLINIC STAFF CONFLICT 

2 OF INTEREST EXEMPTION. 

3 Section 205 of title 18, United States Code, is 

4 amended by inserting at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(j) FEDERAL LEGAL CLINIC STAFF CONFLICT OF

6 INTEREST EXEMPTION.—Subsection (a) does not apply to 

7 a law student or legal clinic staff member participating 

8 in the legal clinic or externship of an accredited law school, 

9 for a covered matter within the scope of the clinic, un10 less— 

11 ‘‘(1) the student or staff has participated per12 sonally and substantially in the covered matter as a 

13 Government employee or special Government em14 ployee through decision, approval, disapproval, rec15 ommendation, the rendering of advice, investigation, 

16 or otherwise; or 

17 ‘‘(2) the covered matter is pending in the de18 partment or agency of the Government in which the 

19 student is serving. 

20 ‘‘(k) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEGAL CLINIC STAFF

21 CONFLICT OF INTEREST EXEMPTION.—Subsection (b) 

22 does not apply to a legal clinic staff member of an accred23 ited law school who is an employee of the District of Co24 lumbia or considered an employee of the District of Co25 lumbia due to work with a legal clinic operated by an instiVerDate Nov 24 2008 02:04 Dec 17, 2009 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2888.IS S2888

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2888 IS

1 tution of higher education of the District of Columbia for 

2 a covered matter within the scope of the clinic, unless— 

3 ‘‘(1) the staff has participated personally and 

4 substantially in the covered matter as a Government 

5 employee or special Government employee through 

6 decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, the 

7 rendering of advice, investigation, or otherwise; or 

8 ‘‘(2) the covered matter is pending in the de9 partment or agency of the Government in which the 

10 staff member is serving.’’. 

11 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

12 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

13 take effect 60 days after the date of enactment. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
18 USC Sec. 1167

TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 

PART I - CRIMES 

CHAPTER 53 - INDIANS 

 

Sec. 1167. Theft from gaming establishments on Indian lands 

(a) Whoever abstracts, purloins, willfully misapplies, or takes and carries away with intent to steal, any money, 

funds, or other property of a value of $1,000 or less belonging to an establishment operated by or for or licensed 

by an Indian tribe pursuant to an ordinance or resolution approved by the National Indian Gaming Commission 

shall be fined under this title or be imprisoned for not more than one year, or both. 

(b) Whoever abstracts, purloins, willfully misapplies, or takes and carries away with intent to steal, any money, 

funds, or other property of a value in excess of $1,000 belonging to a gaming establishment operated by or for 

or licensed by an Indian tribe pursuant to an ordinance or resolution approved by the National Indian Gaming 

Commission shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for not more than ten years, or both. 

(Added Pub. L. 100-497, Sec. 23, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2487; amended Pub. L. 103-322, title XXXIII, Sec. 

330016(1)(S), (U), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.) 

AMENDMENTS 

1994 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103-322, Sec. 330016(1)(S), substituted ''fined under this title'' for ''fined not more 

than $100,000''. 

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103-322, Sec. 330016(1)(U), substituted ''fined under this title'' for ''fined not more than 

$250,000''
EXHIBIT 31.2

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Virgil Baker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of eTotalSource, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 12, 2003


/s/ Virgil Baker
-----------------------
Virgil Baker,
Secretary/Treasurer
January 2016 Page 1 of 2

BLM Recertification Evaluation

This document is used to determine the agency’s minimum requirements for position recertification.

Trainee name: 

Trainee’s supervisor: 

Position to be recertified: 

Unit ID: 

Trainee’s phone number: 

Date of last assignment:

U

Certifying OfficialU: In addition to the mandatory evaluation assignment, the Certifying Official may request 

additional training or coursework. If the Certifying Official chooses to have the trainee complete a new position 

task book (PTB), then the recertification evaluation form is unnecessary. 

Mandatory - Satisfactory performance on at least one evaluation assignment by a qualified evaluator. 

The evaluation assignment should be documented on the Incident Personnel Performance Rating form, 

NFES 1576 (ICS 225).

Check the box next to any UoptionalU requirements the trainee needs to perform prior to being considered for 

recertification (work with the local Qualification and Certification Committee and refer to PMS 310-1):

Open and complete all tasks in the current PTB as outlined by the local Qualification and Certification 

Committee. (Note: The trainee will not need to complete the evaluation assignment if the Certifying 

Official chooses to have the trainee complete a PTB.)

Complete any new “required training” courses based on the current PMS 310-1 or agency policies that 

have been added to the position since losing currency.

Retake all “required training” relevant to the position based on current agency polices.

Attend the following course(s) prior to certification:

Trainee Signature Date

Certifying Official Signature Date

UFinal Agency Certification

I certify that (trainee name) has met all requirements for recertification in the 

above position and qualification has been reissued.

Certifying Official – Signature of Approval Date
January 2016 Page 2 of 2

UEvaluator:U The above individual has lost currency for the stated position. The trainee’s Certifying Official is

asking the evaluator to assess the individual’s skills and abilities to assist them in determining if the trainee should 

be considered for recertification.

Assignment Information:

Incident name:

Dates of evaluation:

Evaluator qualification:

Incident number:

Incident complexity:

Fuel type:

What, if any, significant job tasks, competencies, or behaviors were you unable to evaluate on this assignment?

Provide additional comments related to the individual’s ability to perform the position.

Do you recommend the individual for recertification? 

If no, what recommendation do you have for improving tasks, competencies, and/or behaviors (e.g., more 

experience is needed in logistic support)?

Evaluator (name, home unit, and phone contact) Date

Trainee Signature Date
#### RUVOLO v. AUTOMOBILE TRANSPORT, Inc. (four cases). MAUGERI v. AUTOMOBILE TRANSPORT, Inc.

Civ. Nos. 25703-25707.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

Oct. 13, 1948.

Corrigan, McMahon & Corrigan and Timothy F. McMahon, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

McConnell, Blackmore, Cory & Burke and Burns Weston, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

JONES, Chief Judge.

These are actions for damages for personal injuries arising out of the same accident. Counsel are the same for both sides in each case and in each case identical motions for definite statements have been filed.

Defendant seeks more definite information with respect to “the speed at which plaintiff claims defendant was travelling” and “how defendant failed to keep the tractor and trailer ‘under control’:”

The allegations of negligence as set out in the challenged paragraphs of the complaints are entirely adequate, using Form 9, Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., as a standard. Motions in each case overruled.
#### Raghvir SINGH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-73962.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 20, 2006.*

Filed Nov. 8, 2006.

*644Saad Ahmad Fremont, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Mark L. Gross, Esq., Nathaniel Pollock, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KLEINFELD and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and WHALEY **, District Judge.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Robert H. Whaley, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

The facts and procedural posture of the case are known to the parties, and we do not repeat them here. Under regulations effective September 25, 2002, the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) “may review questions of law, discretion, and judgment and all other issues in appeals from decisions of immigration judges de novo.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(3)(ii). Here, the BIA found that, even if credible, Singh had not alleged facts demonstrating a well-founded fear of persecution. Although the BIA reached its decision on different grounds from the immigration judge (“IJ”), the BIA acted within its authority when it dismissed Singh’s asylum and withholding of removal claims.

Because the BIA’s ruling does not depend on Singh’s credibility, we do not reach the question of whether the IJ erred in making its credibility finding.

Singh’s petition is DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Principles of Retardant Application**

• Determine tactics direct or indirect based on fire size-up and resources available.

• Establish an anchor point and work from it. 

• Use the proper drop height.

• Apply proper coverage levels. 

• Drop downhill and down-sun when feasible.

• Drop into the wind for best accuracy.

• Maintain honest evaluation and effective communication between the ground and air.

• Use direct attack only when ground support is available or extinguishment is feasible.

• Plan drops so they can be extended or intersected effectively.

• Monitor retardant effectiveness and adjust its use accordingly.

**Retardant Coverage Levels**
#### In the Matter of Flavia Joseph, Respondent, v Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 347]

In a proceeding pursuant to Insurance Law § 5218 for leave to commence an action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation appeals from an order of the *832Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated July 25, 2012, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to Insurance Law § 5218 for leave to commence an action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation.

The petitioner failed to demonstrate that the subject accident was one in which the identity of the owner and operator of the subject motor vehicle was unknown *(see*Insurance Law §§ 5208 [a] [2]; 5218 [b] [5]; *Matter of Harrison v Motor Veh. Ace. Indem. Corp.,*110 AD3d 806 [2013]; *Matter of Acosta-Collado v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp.,*103 AD3d 714, 716 [2013]; *Matter of Frankl v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp.,*53 AD2d 614, 614 [1976]; *Hauswirth v American Home Assur. Co.,*244 AD2d 528, 529 [1997]).

The appellant’s remaining contention is not properly before this Court *(see Hauswirth v American Home Assur. Co.,*244 AD2d at 529).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Dillon, J.P., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Cohen, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 54051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Performance Review Board Members

    Title 5, U.S.C. Section 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service Reform Act 
of 1978, Public Law 95-454, requires notice of appointment of 
individuals to serve as a member of the Performance Review Board shall 
be published in the Federal Register.
    The following individuals are hereby appointed to serve on 
Performance Review Boards within the Department of Health and Human 
Services. These individuals supplement membership on existing 
Performance Review Boards.

Office of the Secretary

    Moulds, Donald, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary.
    Monahan, John, Director, Office of Global Health Affairs.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Branche, Christine, Associate Director for NIOSH.

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)

    Morford, Thomas G., Associate Administrator, Office of Operations.

Indian Health Service (IHS)

    Karol M.D., Susan, Chief Medical Officer.

    Dated: October 16, 2009.
Antonia T. Harris,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Human Resources, Department of Health 
and Human Services.
[FR Doc. E9-25452 Filed 10-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P