alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Strodder *v.*The Southern Granite Company.

Where an. accord and satisfaction is fully executed, the party receiving money from the other cannot rescind on the ground of fraud, or of his own mental incompetency to make a binding contract, without refunding or offering to refund the money which was the fruit of the accord and satisfaction. If any exception to this general rule results from inability, by reason of poverty, to restore the money, it is only where the fraud is not discovered, or the mental disability continues, as the case may be, until after the money has been expended or otherwise put beyond the power and control of the plaintiff. To use and appropriate the money with knowledge of the imposition, would be a ratification of the settlement. *Judgment affirmed.*

July 16, 1894.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Richard H. Clark. DeKalb superior court. August term, 1893.

According to the petition, the plaintiff was greatly and permanently injured (among other things losing his eyesight) while in defendant’s employment, by the negligence of his superior in working with dynamite or other explosive material, on January 10, 1893. A month afterwards, while prostrated and wrecked by *627physical and mental torture resulting from the injury, and wholly incapacitated to execute any valid contract without counsel and assistance, defendant by its agent, taking advantage of his helpless condition, came to his dwelling and craftily and fraudulently induced him to sign with his mark a paper reciting that in consideration of medical attention furnished, the payment of his wages for three months, and $20, these were accepted by him in full accord, satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims for damages on account of the injuries received, etc. Defendant well knew his condition and his incapacity to contract, but by-its agent came into his room with attesting witnessess, in the absence of his wife, took him out of his bed and had him to. touch a pen to make his mark to the paper, and then carried him back to bed and left $20 by his side, he not understanding what he was doing; all of which was done hurriedly and quietly. He prayed that, being unable without fault on his part to repay the money, the court would not require him to repay it as a condition precedent to granting the relief he sought; that the writing be can-celled; and that his claim for damages be submitted to a jury, and due provision be made in the verdict and judgment for repayment to defendant of the amount that might appear to be the correct consideration of said writing, if any. The petition was dismissed on demurrer

M. E. Lofton and G. S. Thomas, for plaintiff.

A. H. Cox, for defendant.
Exhibit 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Stanton E. Ross, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Infinity, Inc.;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting

Date:  May 17, 2004


/s/ Stanton E. Ross
-------------------------------------------
Stanton E. Ross, Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                         5
<CIK>                                                    0000823072
<NAME>                                        THE TIREX CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                                      1
<CURRENCY>                                                      USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                          OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                            DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                   1
<CASH>                                                       28,777
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               598,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                 253,089
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          1,419,821
<PP&E>                                                    2,059,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                               98,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            3,598,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     1,342,106
<BONDS>                                                     556,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                    119,516
<OTHER-SE>                                                 (234,375)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              3,598,899
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  0
<CGS>                                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               656,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            (28,652)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           25,390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (685,426)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (685,426)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (685,426)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (.01)


</TABLE>
----

Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATION

I,  John L. Threshie Jr., certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of The TirexCorporation; 

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

(4) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small businessissuer and have: 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

/s/ John L. Threshie Jr       John L. Threshie Jr., CEO

Date: February 06, 2007

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,115,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                   216,979
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,997,041
<PP&E>                                       3,426,595
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,169,561
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,333,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,639,079
<BONDS>                                        483,715
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,210,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,333,213
<SALES>                                      6,502,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,502,096
<CGS>                                        4,631,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,631,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,412,569
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,285
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                424,199
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            390,914
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   390,914
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08



</TABLE>
DATE 11/19/2015

NOTICE OF APPEALS

ASSIGNMENT OF COURT OF APPEALS

TO: 1ST COURT OF APPEALS 

From: Deputy Clerk: DUANE C. GILMORE

Chris Daniel, District Clerk

Harris County, T E X A S

CAUSE: 2015-05657 TRIAL COURT NO: 152ND DUE DATE: 11/7/2015

VOLUME PAGE OR IMAGE #:66190942

ATTORNEY: ALI YAZDCHI TBN/PRO SE#: 1 (Pro Se)

NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

DATE ORDER SIGNED: 7/10/2015

REQUEST TRANSCRIPT DATE FILED N/A

NOTICE OF APPEAL DATE FILED: 10/8/2015 

NOTICE OF APPEAL PREVIOUSLY FILED? Yes (see vexatious litigant order)

NUMBER OF DAYS: ( CLERKS RECORD ) 120

FILE ORDERED: YES NO IMAGED FILED: YES NO 

NOTES: Codes: BC, C, OA; VEXATIOUS LITIGANT

CHRIS DANIEL 

Harris County, District Clerk

By: /s/DUANE C. GILMORE 

 DUANE C. GILMORE, Deputy

BC NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

BG NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED – GOVERNMENT

C JUDGMENT BEING APPEALED

D - ACCELERATED APPEAL

OA NO CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED

O CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED (W/NOTICE OF APPEAL)

NA AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/19/2015 11:48:58 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk








JWEB INT 65.10 CIVIL SYSTEM│CIVIL CASE INTAKE│GENERAL PARTY INQUIRY GILMORE, DUANE NOVEMBER 19, 2015 INT65.10

(6) CONNECTION(S) FOUND.

CASE NUM: 201505657 PJN: TRANS NUM: CURRENT COURT: 151 PUB: Please Select

CASE TYPE: BREACH OF CONTRACT CASE STATUS: DISPOSED (FINAL)

STYLE: YAZDCHI, ALI VS BBVA COMPASS BANK

**** INACTIVE PARTIES ****

PJN PER/CONN 

NO

COC BAR PERSON NAME PTY STAT ASSOC. 

00003 - 0001 DEF 24002330 COMPASS BANK D/B/A BBVA COMPASS, INCORRECLTY NAMED AS BBVA COMPASS HUTTENBACH, WILLIAM P. ATTY

00004 - 0001 XPL 24002330 COMPASS BANK D/B/A BBVA COMPASS, INCORRECTLY NAMED AS BBVA COMPASS HUTTENBACH, WILLIAM P.

00002 - 0002 XPL 24002330 BBVA COMPASS BANK HUTTENBACH, WILLIAM P.

00001 - 0002 XDF YAZDCHI, ALI

00002 - 0001 DEF 24002330 BBVA COMPASS BANK HUTTENBACH, WILLIAM P.

00001 - 0001 PLT YAZDCHI, ALI PRO-SE

Submit Query 1 Total Pages Submit Query Submit Query 1 Submit Query Submit Query Records Per-Page 20

ATY INQ ACT UPDT SERV ISSU DOCU INQ CASE SUMM INQ PTY ADDR

ATY SUB MUL ATY SUB ATY W/DRAWL PTY W/DRAWL

Harris County Information Technology Center (ITC) Justice Applications 

Harris County (JWEB) Justice Applications (INT6510) Page 1 of 1

http://civil.jweb.harriscountytx.gov/INT/INT6510.aspx?GV_CASE_NUM=201505657 11/19/2015
**SEAT Base Operating Plan**

**SEAT Operating Plan Form 2018**

**Documentation:**

Appendix:  

Complete the following forms when SEAT operations are being conducted at the base:

· SEAT Base Organizational Chart

· SEAT Base Contact Information Sheet

· SEAT Base Inventory Sheet

· Government Loading Program supplement (if applicable)

· Retardant spill response plan.

· Storm Water Prevention Pollution Plan (if present)

**SEAT BASE**

**ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE**

**Date:___________                                      SEAT Base Location:_________________**

****

**Date:_________                                                             SEAT BASE CONTACT LIST**

**SEAT Base Inventory Sheet**

**Name of SEAT Base:________________________________________               Location of Base:_______________________________________________**

Fire Management Officer

Aviation Officer for the Unit

SEAT Base Point of Contact

(Name of the individual directly assigned to oversee the SEAT base operation.)

Name:                                                                         Title:

SEAT Manager

T-

T-

T-

SEAT Manager

SEAT Manager

T-

T-

T-

T-

T-

T-

RAMP Manager

Radio Operator

Other Positions

(Names and Positions)
No. 857.

#### Durlacher *v.*Durlacher.

February 9, 1942.

*Messrs. Hamilton Freeland, Jr.*and *Samuel Platt*for petitioner. *Mr. Clyde D. Souter*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT PATR IC K KUNKEL, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. SHERR Y LOPEZ, C M O Ke rn Va lle y State Prison; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 14-15363 D.C . No. 1:11-c v-01026-SAB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Stanle y Albe rt B oone , M a gistra

t e Judge , Pre siding ** Subm itte d De c e m

be r 9, 2014 *** B e fore : WALLAC E, LEAVY, a nd B YB EE, C i rc uit Judge s . Pa tric k Kunke l, a C a l ifornia sta te prisone r, a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismi ssing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c t ion a lle g ing de libe rate 

# FIL ED D EC 18 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** Kunke l c onse nte d to proc e e d be fore a m a gistra t e judge . Se e 28 U.S.C . § 636(c ).

*** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).indiffe re nc e to his se rious m e dic a l ne e ds. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C .

§ 1291. W e re vie wde novo. Re snic k v . Hay e s , 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th C ir. 2000) (dism i ssa l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1915A); Barre n v . Harrington , 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th C ir. 1998) (orde r) (dism issa l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1915(e )(2)). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d Kunke l’ s a c tion be c a u se Kunke l fa ile d to a lle g e fa c ts showing tha t de fe nda nts we re de libe rate ly

indiffe re nt to Kunke l’ s ankle infe c tions. Se e Toguc h i v . C hung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1057-60 (9th C ir. 2004) (a

prison offic ia l is de libe rate ly indiffe re nt only

if he or she knows of and disre ga

rds a n e xc e ssive risk to inmate he a lth; ne ithe r a m e re diffe re nc e of opinion c onc e rning thec ourse of tre atm e nt nor ne glige nc e in dia gnosing or tre at ing a m e dic a l c ondition a

m ounts to de libe rate indiffe re nc e ); se e also Starr v. Bac a , 652 F.3d 1202, 1207-08 (9th C ir. 2011) (re quire m e nts for e sta blishing supe

rvisory lia bility); C ousins v . Loc k

y e r , 568 F.3d 1063, 1070 (9th C ir. 2009) (fa ilure to follow inte rna l prison polic i e s doe s not riseto the le ve l of a c onstitutiona

l viola tion). AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 1 5 3 6 3 2
4. Effectiveness. This Amendment shall become effective as of the date hereof uponreceipt by the Liquidity Agent of counterparts of this Amendment (whether by facsimile orotherwise) executed by each of the other parties hereto.          5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and bydifferent parties on separate counterparts, and each counterpart shall be deemed to be an original,and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.          6. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordancewith, the internal laws of the State of New York without regard to any otherwise applicableprinciples of conflicts of law.          7. Section Headings. The various headings of this Amendment are inserted forconvenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this amendment or theAgreement or any provision hereof or thereof.[SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
2

 
     **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, this Amendment has been duly signed by the parties as of the date setforth above.      **COFINA FUNDING, LLC**,
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                   |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Paul Mendez                                                   |   |
|   |   | Paul Mendez,Chief Executive OfficerSynergx Systems Inc.August 14, 2009 |   |
|   |   |                                                                   |   |
|   |   |                                                                   |   |

|   |   |                                                                        |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                        |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ John A. Poserina                                                   |   |
|   |   | John A. Poserina,                                                           |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial OfficerSynergx Systems Inc.Date:  August 14, 2009 |
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

955 

CAF 11-01931 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF NINA E. HAWTHORNE, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JASON L. HALL, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

CHARLES J. GREENBERG, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

COURTNEY S. RADICK, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, OSWEGO, FOR DECEMBER R.H. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Bobette

J. Morin, R.), entered August 25, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition for

modification of custody and visitation. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Hall v Hawthorne ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d

___ [Oct. 5, 2012]).

Entered: October 5, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court