alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.3






November 2, 2007



U.S. Bank National Association


BC-MN-H03B


800 Nicollet Mall


Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402


Attn: Mortgage Banking Division, Randy Baker


(T):(612) 303-3580


(F):(612) 303-2253


E: randall.baker@usbank.com



Re: Notice and Request for Waiver



Ladies and Gentlemen:



Reference is made to that certain Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November
16, 2005 and as amended through November 30, 2006 (the “Agreement”), by and between MMA
Mortgage Investment Corporation (“MMIC”) and U.S. Bank, National Association. All
capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the
Agreement.



Notice



This correspondence will serve as notice of the matters set forth herein given pursuant to the
requirements of the applicable notices sections of the Agreement.



As you know, our continuing efforts to restate certain of the historical GAAP financial
statements of Municipal Mortgage & Equity, LLC (“MuniMae”) and certain other matters have
delayed the completion of certain of our 2006 financial statements and periodic reports, as well as
the financial statements for certain of our affiliates. As a result and as we have informed your
previously, we will be unable to comply with the applicable financial reporting and related
covenants set forth in the Agreement.



Request for Waiver



We hereby request a waiver of any and all Defaults or Events of Default with respect to the
delayed delivery of the MMIC audited financials statements as required by the Agreement; provided
that we are able to deliver audited financial statements for MMIC on or before February 15, 2008.



1



This notice is being delivered to you as confirmation of our earlier discussion with you on
the topics set forth above and our understanding that this situation dies not present any issues
under the Agreement. Please contact me by phone at (813) 868-8025 or e-mail at
ed.feldkamp@munimae.com if this is not the case.



Sincerely,



MUNICIPAL MORTGAGE & EQUITY, LLC



By: /s/ Edward Feldkamp

Name: Edward Feldkamp

Title:Vice President and Treasurer









Please indicate your agreement and acknowledgement to the matters set forth above by signing

below and returning a copy of this page to me by e-mail or facsimile.



U.S. Bank, N.A.



By: /s/ Randy S. Baker

Name:Randy S. Baker

Title:Vice President




Date: 11/30/2007




2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 83 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 83

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief for 
 the conversion of cooperative housing corporations into condominiums.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief for 
 the conversion of cooperative housing corporations into condominiums.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NONRECOGNITION OF GAIN OR LOSS ON DISTRIBUTIONS BY 
              COOPERATIVE HOUSING CORPORATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 216(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to distributions by cooperative housing corporations) is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Distributions by Cooperative Housing Corporations.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in regulations--
                    ``(A) no gain or loss shall be recognized to a 
                cooperative housing corporation on the distribution by 
                such corporation of a dwelling unit to a stockholder in 
                such corporation if such distribution is in exchange 
                for the stockholder's stock in such corporation, and
                    ``(B) no gain or loss shall be recognized to a 
                stockholder of such corporation on the transfer of such 
                stockholder's stock in an exchange described in 
                subparagraph (A).
            ``(2) Basis.--The basis of a dwelling unit acquired in a 
        distribution to which paragraph (1) applies shall be the same 
        as the basis of the stock in the cooperative housing 
        corporation for which it is exchanged, decreased in the amount 
        of any money received by the taxpayer in such exchange.
            ``(3) Applicability.--This subsection shall not apply with 
        respect to any dwelling unit the basis of which includes 
        financing under any Federal, State, or local program for the 
        purpose of assisting the construction of affordable housing 
        cooperatives or the conversion of rental units to affordable 
        housing cooperatives.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to distributions after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
The District Court of the 18th Judicial District. County of Gallatin.

#### STATE OF MONTANA Plaintiff, vs. FRANCISCO FLORES, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-08-135B DECISION

On September 16, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison, with fourteen (14) years suspended, for the offense of Robbery, a felony.

On May 6,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 6 th day of May, 2010.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
-  Home 
        -  Research & Funding 
        -  Technology Advancement & Transfer 
        -  Research Materials & Licensing 
        -  Personalized Body Weight Management System Using Monitoring Devices & Mathematical Models of Metabolism 

View Research Materials

# Personalized Body Weight Management System Using Monitoring Devices & Mathematical Models of Metabolism

Attempts to manage body weight are often unsuccessful or only temporary. This is, in part, due to antiquated dieting methods that attempt to address calorie consumption while ignoring metabolic and physical changes. Personalized and more comprehensive methods to track and manage body weight may be more effective.  To that end, scientists at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) developed and launched the Body Weight Planner that uses validated mathematical models of human metabolism to set weight management goals and predict individual body weight outcomes in the context of changing metabolic needs and calorie consumption.

More recently, developers at NIDDK have created a prototype personalized body weight management system prototype that builds on the science behind Body Weight Planner with the addition of patented tracking and feedback technology.  This new system is targeted for use by professionals and is designed to be integrated into a comprehensive healthcare or wellness program.  Improvements enable users to more accurately plan, track, and update personalized weight management interventions by accounting for changes in human appetite, metabolism, and calorie expenditure over time. There are opportunities for the prototype to be combined with other devices to provide data input through wearables and at-home measurements. This system provides meaningful feedback through enhanced functionality and features to meet weight management goals.

### Resource Details

Resource Link:https://www.techtransfer.nih.gov/tech/tab-2386

NIDDK Contact:tao@niddk.nih.gov

Principal Investigator(s):Hall, Kevin

Share this page
FacebookXEmailWhatsAppLinkedInRedditPinterest
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSE ADRIAN MARTINEZ,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00253-CR

Appeal from the

210th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20160D03012)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time within which to file the

brief until January 30, 2019. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

THE STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza, the State’s attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before January 30, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of December, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Larry A. Goldstone, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Larry A. Goldstone

Larry A. Goldstone
President and Chief Operating Officer
March 3, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



Certification of President and CEO pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

Laurel Capital Group, Inc.


In connection with the Annual Report of Laurel Capital Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edwin
R. Maus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the period covered by the Report.


/s/ Edwin R. Maus
-----------------
Edwin R. Maus
President and Chief Executive Officer
September 30, 2002
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I, David L. Weinberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Columbia Laboratories, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior
to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and



6. The registrants other certifying officer and I
have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|Date: August 14, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |
#### State v. Murphy

Case below: 172 N.C. App. 734

No. 485P05

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA04-344)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 360 N.C. 74

Stay dissolved 12/19/06

2. Denied 12/19/06

3. See Special Order Page 164

Timmons-Goodson, J., Recused
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6735

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JUSTIN DEONTA STROM, a/k/a Jae Dee, a/k/a Jae, a/k/a J

- Dirt , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cr - 00159

- LMB

- 1; 1:15

- cv 00632

- JCC )

Submitted : October 23, 2018 Decided: October 26, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Justin Deonta St rom , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Justin Deonta Strom seeks to appeal the district court’ s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s June 6, 2017, order , which denied relief o n two unadjudicated claims initially raised in Strom’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. Th is order , which was entered on June 8, 2018, is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right .” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable o r wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debata ble, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Strom has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifica te of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Docket 53-2008]

      ( print page 673)    
The public hearing scheduled for January 8, 2009, on the application for subzone status at the Hoku Materials, Inc. (Hoku), facility in Pocatello, Idaho (73 FR 59597, 10/9/08) has been cancelled. The party which had requested the hearing, Globe Metallurgical Inc. (Globe), submitted a letter to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board on January 2, 2009, withdrawing its request as a result of Hoku's December 31, 2008, amendment of its application in which Hoku indicated that it would not admit silicon metal subject to antidumping or countervailing duty orders into the proposed subzone facility and would accept an FTZ Board Order condition restricting such admission. Additional information is available on the FTZ Board web page via www.trade.gov/​ftz.

As indicated previously, the comment period for this case is open through January 23, 2009. Rebuttal comments may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period, until February 9, 2009. For further information, contact Diane Finver at Diane_Finver@ita.doc.gov or (202) 482-1367.

Dated: January 5, 2009.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-123 Filed 1-5-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
EXHIBIT 8.1



List of Subsidiaries of KT Corporation

(As of December 31, 2007)



|                                       |  |                             
|-------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Name                                   |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation
|KT Freetel Co., Ltd.                   |  | Korea                       
|KT Hitel Co., Ltd.                     |  | Korea                       
|KT Submarine Co., Ltd.                 |  | Korea                       
|KT Powertel Co., Ltd.                  |  | Korea                       
|KT Networks Corporation                |  | Korea                       
|KT Linkus Co., Ltd.                    |  | Korea                       
|KT Commerce Inc.                       |  | Korea                       
|KTF Technologies Inc.                  |  | Korea                       
|KTF M Hows                             |  | Korea                       
|Korea Telecom America, Inc.            |  | U.S.A.                      
|KTF M&S Co., Ltd.                      |  | Korea                       
|New Telephone Company, Inc.            |  | Russia                      
|Korea Telecom Japan Co., Ltd.          |  | Japan                       
|Korea Telecom China Co., Ltd.          |  | China                       
|KT Internal Venture Fund No. 2         |  | Korea                       
|KT FDS Co., Ltd.                       |  | Korea                       
|KT Rental Co., Ltd.                    |  | Korea                       
|KT Capital Co., Ltd.                   |  | Korea                       
|Sidus FNH Corporation                  |  | Korea                       
|PT. KTF Indonesia                      |  | Indonesia                   
|Sidus FNH Benex Cinema Investment Fund |  | Korea                       
|Telecop Service Co., Ltd.              |  | Korea                       
|Olive Nine Co., Ltd.                   |  | Korea                       
|Bluecord Technology Co., Ltd.          |  | Korea                       
|Doremi Media Co., Ltd.                 |  | Korea                       
|Super iMax                             |  | Uzbekistan                  
|East Telecom                           |  | Uzbekistan                  
|KTSC Investment Management B.V.        |  | Netherlands
EXHIBIT
        32a: Rule 13a - 14(b) Certification
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Earthworks Entertainment,
        Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that:
  1.  The
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment #2) of the Company for the period
        ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
        78m or
        78o(d)); and
  2.  The
        information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
 
 
 FEBRUARY
                  13, 2006
              /s/ PETER KEEFEPeter
                  KeefePresident,
                  Chief Executive Officer