alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 15, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ C. Kirk Peacock
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Name:               |  | C. Kirk Peacock                      
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dondi Credle, Appellant.

Submitted September 7, 2010;

decided September 16, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   |   |
| 1.     | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) of Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.; and |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   |   |
| 2.     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |
|                    |
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ William Monteleone  |
| William Monteleone      |
| Chief Financial Officer |
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 282 

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 

relations treatment) to the products of Kazakhstan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 21, 2009 

Mr. LUGAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment 

(normal trade relations treatment) to the products of 

Kazakhstan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV 

4 OF THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO THE PROD5 UCTS OF KAZAKHSTAN. 

6 (a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTEN7 SION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwith8 standing any provision of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 

9 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may— 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 282 IS

1 (1) determine that the denial of nondiscrim2 inatory treatment should no longer apply to the 

3 products of Kazakhstan; and 

4 (2) after making a determination under para5 graph (1) with respect to Kazakhstan, proclaim the 

6 extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal 

7 trade relations treatment) to the products of 

8 Kazakhstan. 

9 (b) TERMINATION OF APPLICABILITY OF TITLE

10 IV.—On and after the date on which the President ex11 tends nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of 

12 Kazakhstan pursuant to subsection (a), title IV of the 

13 Trade Act of 1974 shall cease to apply to Kazakhstan. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Fernando Guerrero, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[977 NYS2d 470]

*1169Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

When a urine sample provided by petitioner, a prison inmate, twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids, he was charged in a misbehavior report with the use of a controlled substance. Petitioner was found guilty of the charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing, and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. He then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, testimony of the correction officer who performed the drug testing, and positive test results with supporting documentation provide substantial evidence to support the determination *(see Matter of Monje v Geoghegan,*108 AD3d 957, 957 [2013]; *Matter of Smith v Unger,*100 AD3d 1171, 1171 [2012]). The validity of the test results was not undermined by the fact that they were recorded on a single form — rather than separate forms as contemplated by the directive — as the single form was developed to reduce paperwork *(see e.g. Matter of Hall v Venettozzi,*98 AD3d 773, 773 [2012]; *Matter of Faraldo v Bezio,*93 AD3d 1007, 1008 [2012]). Further, petitioner was not denied the right to present documentary evidence by the Hearing Officer’s refusal to provide him with a copy of the log book entry for the testing room refrigerator. The record demonstrates that the Hearing Officer viewed the entry and related to petitioner its contents, which was contained in other forms in evidence and, thus, the denial of the entry itself did not prejudice petitioner’s defense *(see Matter of Phelps v Fischer,*108 AD3d 1003, 1004 [2013]; *Matter of Justice v Fischer,*67 AD3d 1286, 1286-1287 [2009], *lv denied*14 NY3d 709 [2010]). Lastly, petitioner was not deprived of effective employee assistance, but, rather, failed to request the documentary evidence from his assistant that he now claims was not provided *(see e.g. Matter of Williams v Fischer,*98 AD3d 1180, 1181 [2012]; *Matter of Tafari v Selsky,*38 AD3d 1031, 1032 [2007], *lv denied*8 NY3d 816 [2007]). Petitioner’s remaining arguments are either unpreserved for our review or are lacking in merit.

Peters, PJ., Rose, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 204 (Friday, October 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54840-54841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25214]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5280-N-41]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: October 23, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist

[[Page 54841]]

the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no 
additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this 
week.

    Dated: October 15, 2009.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. E9-25214 Filed 10-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2007-J2
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-J2


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an
officer of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans
Servicing LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant
to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                     Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Cistera Networks, Inc. on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2007,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, Derek Downs, President  of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)           the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/    Derek
      P. Downs


Derek
      P.
      Downs


President


(Principal
      Executive Officer)








November
      19, 2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-185153 on Form F-3 of our report dated April 29, 2015, relating to theconsolidated financial statements of Banco Santander, S.A. (the “Bank”) and Companies composing, together with the Bank, the Santander Group (the “Group”), and our report dated April 29, 2015, relating to the effectiveness of theGroup’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Group for the year ended December 31, 2014. 

/s/ Deloitte, S.L. 

DELOITTE, S.L. 

Madrid, Spain 

April 29, 2015
EXHIBIT  32

      STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HairMax International,
Inc.  (the  "Company") for the six months ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
A.  Roth,  Chief  Executive Officer, and Michael J. Bongiovanni, Chief Financial
Officer  of  the  Company,  certify  that:

*    the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

*    information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     on  the  dates  and  for  the  periods  presented.


/s/  Edward  A.  Roth
---------------------
Edward  A.  Roth
Director,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer

August  18,  2004


/s/  Michael  J.  Bongiovanni
-----------------------------
Michael  J.  Bongiovanni
Director  and  Chief  Financial  Officer

August  18,  2004


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  be  deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of
Section  18  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.
| (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 1, 2012  | By:    | /s/  ZSOLT RUMY |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                               |   | Zsolt Rumy                |   |
|                               |   | Chief Executive Officer   |   |
|                               |   |                      |
|                               |   |                      |
|                               |   |                      |   |
No. 903.

#### Peyton *v.*Railway Express Agency, Inc. et al.

March 9, 1942.

*Robert L. Peyton, pro se. Messrs. Harry S. Marx*and *Charles C. Evans*for respondents.

The motion for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is also granted.
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

We hereby consent to the
references in this Form 10-K of Plains Exploration & Production Company, as well as in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in such Form 10-K, to our reserve reports to the interest of Plains Exploration &
Production Company and its subsidiaries (collectively the Company), relating to the estimated quantities of certain of the Companys proved and probable reserves of oil and gas and present values thereof for certain periods. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-102627, No. 333-107990, No. 333-115628, No. 333-117425, No. 333-145004 and No. 333-166830) and Form S-3 (No.
333-165263) of Plains Exploration & Production Company.



NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

/s/ Danny D. SimmonsDanny D. Simmons, P.E.President and Chief Operating Officer


Houston, Texas

February 23, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,462,779
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,184,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,406,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,375,910
<PP&E>                                      89,892,333
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,152,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              87,706,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,740,757
<BONDS>                                      7,425,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       16,055,055
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,439
<OTHER-SE>                                  55,820,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                87,706,891
<SALES>                                     32,194,399<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,194,399<F1>
<CGS>                                       22,613,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,903,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,192<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             533,360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,290,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (767,458)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,523,434)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,523,434)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)
<FN>
<F1>Sales and Total Revenues are net of federal and state excise taxes.
<F2>Includes a $260,000 non-cash loss related to a key exchange.
</FN>


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 08-1498

LATIN AMERICAN MUSIC COMPANY, d/b/a Asociación de Compositores y

Editores de Música Latinoamericana (ACEMLA); ASOCIACIÓN DE

COMPOSITORES Y EDITORES DE MÚSICA LATINOAMERICANA (ACEMLA),

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS,

Defendants, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on December 28, 2010, is

amended as follows:

On page 3, line 15, "§ 101," is deleted

On page 4, lines 16-17, "Fed. R. App. P." is substituted for

"First Circuit Local Rule"
2016 BLM Airwards 

& Recognition

Kirk Rothwell National Aviation Safety & Training Advisor
In-Flight Action Awards
In-Flight Action Awards
Airward
Certificate of Excellence
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio LOVETTE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-15842

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 26, 2006.

Charles Leslie Handlin, III, Handlin *&*Hefferan, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Karin B. Hoppmann, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before BLACK, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Charles L. Handlin, appointed counsel for Antonio Lovette in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

At the sentencing hearing, the district court stated that Counts 3, 5, 8, *and 11,*of the indictment were dismissed, as per Lo*879vette’s plea agreement. This statement was in error as Count 11 did not pertain to Lovette, and under the plea agreement Counts 3, 5, 8, *and 21*should have been dismissed at sentencing. The district court’s written judgment correctly dismissed Counts 3, 5, 8, and 21. Accordingly, we affirm Lovette’s conviction and sentence, but remand the case to the district court for the limited purpose of allowing that court to correct the inconsistency between the written judgment and the oral judgment. *United States v. Khoury,*901 F.2d 975, 978-9 (11th Cir.1990) (remanding for resentencing due to substantive error in oral judgment); *United States v. Bates,*213 F.3d 1336, 1340 (11th Cir.2000) (remanding for correction of clerical error in written judgment under Rule 36); *see also United States v. Portillo,*363 F.3d 1161, 1166 (11th Cir.2004) (defendant’s presence not required for the court to correct a clerical error that does not substantially change his sentence).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction.
ELIZABE BROWN CIE - • a F 6 • REME CO RT 0 .^ # 41 t DEPU CLERK

BY: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RICHARD RUPPERT, Appellant, vs. AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, Respondent. No. 83753 

# FILED DEC 1 5 2021

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This appeal was docketed on November 10, 2021, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 14 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2).

It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN

cc: Hon. Jasmin D. Lilly-Spells, District Judge Richard Ruppert Patenaude & Felix, APC Eighth District Court Clerk



# zi- 3579-2- SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER (0) 1947 4400