##### Table of Contents





UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

|x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008

OR



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period from  to

Commission File Number 0-16449





TIGERLOGIC CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



|                                         |  |                          
|---------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|Delaware                                 |  | 94-3046892               
|(State of Incorporation)                 |  | (I.R.S. Employer ID. No.)
|                                         | 
|25A Technology Drive, Irvine, California |  | 92618                    
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |  | (Zip Code)               

(949) 442-4400

(Issuers Telephone Number, Including Area Code)





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES  x    NO   ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the
definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



|                           |  |                      |  |                                               |  |                             
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Large accelerated filer   ̈ |  | Accelerated filer   ̈ |  | Non-accelerated filer   ̈                      |  | Smaller reporting company  x
|                           |  |                      |  | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |  |                             

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES   ̈    NO  x

As of July 31, 2008, the Registrant had 26,482,179 shares of its common stock outstanding.









---

##### Table of Contents

TIGERLOGIC CORPORATION

INDEX



|         |  |                                                                                                       |  |   
|-------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --
|PART I.  |  | FINANCIAL INFORMATION                                                                                 |  | 3 
|ITEM 1.  |  | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS                                                                                  |  | 3 
|         |  | UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS JUNE 30, 2008 AND MARCH 31, 2008                     |  | 3 
|         |  | UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 AND
2007 |  | 4 
|         |  | UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS  THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 AND
2007 |  | 5 
|         |  | NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS                                    |  | 6 
|ITEM 2.  |  | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS                 |  | 10
|ITEM 3.  |  | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK                                            |  | 20
|ITEM 4.  |  | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES                                                                               |  | 20
|PART II. |  | OTHER INFORMATION                                                                                     |  | 21
|ITEM 1.  |  | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS                                                                                     |  | 21
|ITEM 1A. |  | RISK FACTORS                                                                                          |  | 21
|ITEM 2.  |  | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS                                           |  | 25
|ITEM 3.  |  | DEFAULT UPON SENIOR SECURITIES                                                                        |  | 25
|ITEM 4.  |  | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS                                                   |  | 25
|ITEM 5.  |  | OTHER INFORMATION                                                                                     |  | 26
|ITEM 6.  |  | EXHIBITS                                                                                              |  | 26



2



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION



|ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|------- | --------------------

TIGERLOGIC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS



|                                                                                               |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------- | ------- | - | ------------- | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                               |  | June 30,2008   |         |   | March 31,2008 |  
|                                                                                               |  | (In thousands) |        
|ASSETS                                                                                         |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Current assets                                                                                 |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                      |  | $              | 12,053  |   |               | $ | 14,065  |  
|Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $156 and $271, respectively |  |                | 1,781   |   |               |   | 1,845   |  
|Other current assets                                                                           |  |                | 483     |   |               |   | 439     |  
|                                                                                               |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Total current assets                                                                           |  |                | 14,317  |   |               |   | 16,349  |  
|Property, furniture and equipment-net                                                          |  |                | 1,267   |   |               |   | 1,053   |  
|Goodwill                                                                                       |  |                | 26,388  |   |               |   | 26,388  |  
|Deferred tax assets                                                                            |  |                | 453     |   |               |   | 460     |  
|Other assets                                                                                   |  |                | 142     |   |               |   | 142     |  
|                                                                                               |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Total assets                                                                                   |  | $              | 42,567  |   |               | $ | 44,392  |  
|                                                                                               |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY                                                           |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Current liabilities                                                                            |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Accounts payable                                                                               |  | $              | 361     |   |               | $ | 424     |  
|Accrued liabilities                                                                            |  |                | 1,791   |   |               |   | 2,659   |  
|Deferred revenue                                                                               |  |                | 5,277   |   |               |   | 5,257   |  
|                                                                                               |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Total current liabilities                                                                      |  |                | 7,429   |   |               |   | 8,340   |  
|Long-term debt-net of discount                                                                 |  |                |        |   |               |   | 977     |  
|                                                                                               |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Total liabilities                                                                              |  |                | 7,429   |   |               |   | 9,317   |  
|Commitments and contingencies                                                                  |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Stockholders equity                                                                           |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Preferred stock                                                                                |  |                |        |   |               |   |        |  
|Common stock                                                                                   |  |                | 2,648   |   |               |   | 2,625   |  
|Additional paid-in-capital                                                                     |  |                | 128,114 |   |               |   | 126,610 |  
|Accumulated other comprehensive income                                                         |  |                | 1,368   |   |               |   | 1,367   |  
|Accumulated deficit                                                                            |  |                | (96,992 | ) |               |   | (95,527 | )
|                                                                                               |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Total stockholders equity                                                                     |  |                | 35,138  |   |               |   | 35,075  |  
|                                                                                               |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity                                                     |  | $              | 42,567  |   |               | $ | 44,392  |  
|                                                                                               |  |                |         |   |               |   |         |  

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

TIGERLOGIC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS



|                                                              |  |                                      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------ | -
|                                                              |  | Three Months Ended June 30,          |       
|                                                              |  | 2008                                 |        |   | 2007 |  
|                                                              |  | (In thousands, except pershare data) |       
|Net revenues                                                  |  |                                      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Licenses                                                      |  | $                                    | 1,636  |   |      | $ | 2,002  |  
|Services                                                      |  |                                      | 2,919  |   |      |   | 2,971  |  
|                                                              |  |                                      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Total net revenues                                            |  |                                      | 4,555  |   |      |   | 4,973  |  
|Operating expenses                                            |  |                                      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Cost of license revenues                                      |  |                                      | 4      |   |      |   | 9      |  
|Cost of service revenues                                      |  |                                      | 448    |   |      |   | 485    |  
|Selling and marketing                                         |  |                                      | 1,827  |   |      |   | 1,304  |  
|Research and development                                      |  |                                      | 2,232  |   |      |   | 1,997  |  
|General and administrative                                    |  |                                      | 1,543  |   |      |   | 1,323  |  
|                                                              |  |                                      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Total operating expenses                                      |  |                                      | 6,054  |   |      |   | 5,118  |  
|                                                              |  |                                      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Operating loss                                                |  |                                      | (1,499 | ) |      |   | (145   | )
|Other income (expense)                                        |  |                                      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Interest income (expense)-net                                 |  |                                      | 51     |   |      |   | (202   | )
|Other income (expense)-net                                    |  |                                      | (6     | ) |      |   | 178    |  
|                                                              |  |                                      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Total other income (expense)                                  |  |                                      | 45     |   |      |   | (24    | )
|                                                              |  |                                      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Loss before income taxes                                      |  |                                      | (1,454 | ) |      |   | (169   | )
|Income tax provision                                          |  |                                      | 11     |   |      |   | 19     |  
|                                                              |  |                                      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Net loss                                                      |  | $                                    | (1,465 | ) |      | $ | (188   | )
|                                                              |  |                                      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Basic and diluted net loss per share                          |  | $                                    | (0.06  | ) |      | $ | (0.01  | )
|                                                              |  |                                      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share |  |                                      | 26,452 |   |      |   | 21,186 |  

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

TIGERLOGIC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS



|                                                                                      |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------ | -
|                                                                                      |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |       
|                                                                                      |  | 2008                        |        |   | 2007 |  
|                                                                                      |  | (In thousands)              |       
|Cash flows from operating activities:                                                 |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Net loss                                                                              |  | $                           | (1,465 | ) |      | $ | (188   | )
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:           |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Depreciation and amortization of long-lived assets                                    |  |                             | 106    |   |      |   | 65     |  
|Provision for bad debt                                                                |  |                             | (19    | ) |      |   | 2      |  
|Note discount amortization                                                            |  |                             |       |   |      |   | 21     |  
|Stock-based compensation expense                                                      |  |                             | 450    |   |      |   | 255    |  
|Income tax expense                                                                    |  |                             | 11     |   |      |   | 19     |  
|Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss                                                 |  |                             | 8      |   |      |   | (139   | )
|Change in assets and liabilities:                                                     |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Trade accounts receivable                                                             |  |                             | 82     |   |      |   | (369   | )
|Other current and non-current assets                                                  |  |                             | (45    | ) |      |   | (31    | )
|Accounts payable                                                                      |  |                             | (54    | ) |      |   | 120    |  
|Accrued liabilities                                                                   |  |                             | (702   | ) |      |   | (360   | )
|Deferred revenue                                                                      |  |                             | 18     |   |      |   | 105    |  
|                                                                                      |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Net cash used in operating activities                                                 |  |                             | (1,610 | ) |      |   | (500   | )
|                                                                                      |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Cash flows used in investing activities-purchase of property, furniture and equipment |  |                             | (498   | ) |      |   | (27    | )
|                                                                                      |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Cash flows provided by financing activities-proceeds from exercise of stock options   |  |                             | 100    |   |      |   | 5      |  
|                                                                                      |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Effect of exchange rate changes on cash                                               |  |                             | (4     | ) |      |   | 158    |  
|                                                                                      |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                                             |  |                             | (2,012 | ) |      |   | (364   | )
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                                      |  |                             | 14,065 |   |      |   | 11,654 |  
|                                                                                      |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                                            |  | $                           | 12,053 |   |      | $ | 11,290 |  
|                                                                                      |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Non-cash financing activities:                                                        |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Accrued interest added to debt                                                        |  | $                           |       |   |      | $ | 302    |  
|Conversion of debt to common stock                                                    |  | $                           | 977    |   |      | $ |       |  

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.



5



---

##### Table of Contents

TIGERLOGIC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2008

1. INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial information furnished herein reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items,
which in the opinion of management are necessary to fairly state TigerLogic Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company or we, us or our) results of operations and cash flows for
the dates and periods presented and to make such information not misleading. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America have been omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations; nevertheless, management of the Company believes that the disclosures herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2008, contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. The results of operations for the
three month period ended June 30, 2008, are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other interim period or the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009.

2. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has a stock option plan that provides for the granting of
stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units to directors, employees and consultants. The Company also has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan which allows the employees to purchase the Companys common stock at a discount.

Total stock-based compensation expense included in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, were as follows (in thousands):



|                                       |  |                             |     |      |   |    
|-------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | --- | ---- | - | ---
|                                       |  | Three Months Ended June 30,
|                                       |  | 2008                        |     | 2007
|Cost of revenue                        |  | $                           | 7   |      | $ |   
|Selling and marketing                  |  |                             | 211 |      |   | 86 
|Research and development               |  |                             | 127 |      |   | 79 
|General and administrative             |  |                             | 105 |      |   | 90 
|                                       |  |                             |     |      |   |    
|Total stock-based compensation expense |  |                             | 450 |      |   | 255
|Income tax benefit                     |  |                             |    |      |   |   
|                                       |  |                             |     |      |   |    
|Net stock-based compensation expense   |  | $                           | 450 |      | $ | 255
|                                       |  |                             |     |      |   |    

As of June 30, 2008, there was approximately $3.2 million of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years.

3. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling
interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date. SFAS No. 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Management of the Company cannot determine at this time what effect the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) will have on its future consolidated results of
operations and financial condition.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statementsan amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51(SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parents equity. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008. Management of the Company does not expect this statement to have a material impact on its future consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). This statement
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. It also applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit
fair value measurement as a relevant attribute. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and all interim periods within that fiscal year. For nonfinancial assets and
liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, there is a one year deferral of the effective date. The implementation of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities, effective
December 31, 2007, did not have a material impact on the Companys interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. Under Level 1 measurement, our cash equivalents, consisting of investments in money market mutual funds, were
$6.9 million at June 30, 2008 with no gain or loss (realized or unrealized) for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Level 1 inputs are defined as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Management of the Company is evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities on the Companys consolidated results of
operations and financial condition.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

4. DEBT

Long-Term
Debt

Long-term debt of the Company as of March 31, 2008 consisted of (in thousands):



|                                       |  |               |    
|-------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ---
|                                       |  | March 31,2008
|Subordinated convertible notes payable |  | $             | 965
|Plus accrued interest                  |  |               | 12 
|                                       |  |               |    
|Total notes payable                    |  | $             | 977
|                                       |  |               |    

Astoria Capital Partners, L.P. (Astoria), GFAM Hedge Partnership (GFAM),
and CAM Small Cap Fund L.P. (CAM) were each holders of a 5% Convertible Subordinated Note Due in May 2008 (each, a Convertible Subordinated Note). The interest rate of the Convertible Subordinated Notes was 5% per annum,
payable quarterly, which had been refinanced through increases to the outstanding principal of the Convertible Subordinated Notes. The Convertible Subordinated Notes had a maturity date of May 30, 2008. The Convertible Subordinated Notes were
convertible into common stock, at the option of the holder, at a price of $5.00 per share, at any time through May 29, 2008.

On
October 4, 2007, the Company received a conversion notice from Astoria and on October 5, 2007, the Company received a conversion notice from GFAM, each electing to convert its Convertible Subordinated Note in full. As a result, $22,917,000
of outstanding principal owed to Astoria under its Convertible Subordinate Note was converted into 4,583,400 shares of the Companys common stock, and $981,000 of outstanding principal owed to GFAM under its Convertible Subordinated Note was
converted into 196,200 shares of the Companys common stock. Per the terms of the Convertible Subordinated Notes, the Company made a cash payment to Astoria and GFAM of approximately $13,181 and $1,264, respectively, for amounts outstanding
under the Convertible Subordinated Notes that were not converted into shares of common stock. Following the conversion of such Convertible Subordinated Notes and the cash payment to Astoria and GFAM, the Convertible Subordinated Notes held by
Astoria and GFAM were cancelled.

On April 10, 2008, the Company received a conversion notice from CAM electing to convert its
Convertible Subordinated Note in full. As a result, $977,000 of outstanding principal owed to CAM under its Convertible Subordinated Note was converted into 195,400 shares of the Companys common stock. Per the terms of the Convertible
Subordinated Note, the Company made a cash payment to CAM of approximately $1,531 for the amount outstanding under the Convertible Subordinated Note that was not converted into shares of common stock. Following the conversion of such Convertible
Subordinated Note and the cash payment to CAM, the Convertible Subordinated Note held by CAM was cancelled and there are no Convertible Subordinated Notes outstanding subsequent to April 10, 2008.

5. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

Basic loss per share is
computed using the net loss and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is computed using the net loss and the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares
outstanding during the period when the potential common shares are not anti-dilutive. Potential dilutive common shares include outstanding stock options and convertible debt. There were outstanding options to purchase 4,567,120 shares of the
Companys common stock with exercise prices ranging from $0.85 to $17.00 per share as of June 30, 2008. There were outstanding options to purchase 4,326,554 shares of the Companys common stock with exercise prices ranging from $0.75
to $17.00 per share as of June 30, 2007. There was convertible debt outstanding at June 30, 2007 which was convertible into 4,894,656 shares of common stock. There was no convertible debt outstanding at June 30, 2008. The
effects of these items were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because such effects would have been anti-dilutive.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

The change in accumulated other comprehensive income during the three-month periods ended June 30,
2008 and 2007,

is the result of the effect of foreign exchange rate changes. The following table reconciles net loss as reported with total comprehensive
loss (in thousands):



|                            |  |                             |        |   |      |   |      |  
|--------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ---- | -
|                            |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |       
|                            |  | 2008                        |        |   | 2007 |  
|Net loss reported           |  | $                           | (1,465 | ) |      | $ | (188 | )
|Translation adjustmentsnet |  |                             | 1      |   |      |   | (189 | )
|                            |  |                             |        |   |      |   |      |  
|Total comprehensive loss    |  | $                           | (1,464 | ) |      | $ | (377 | )
|                            |  |                             |        |   |      |   |      |  

6. BUSINESS SEGMENT

The Company operates in one reportable segment. International operations consist primarily of foreign sales offices selling software developed in the United States of America combined with local maintenance revenue.
The following table summarizes consolidated financial information of the Companys operations by geographic location (in thousands):



|                  |  |                             |        |               |   |       
|----------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------ | ------------- | - | ------
|                  |  | Three Months Ended June 30,
|                  |  | 2008                        |        | 2007         
|Net revenue       |  |                             |        |               |   |       
|North America     |  | $                           | 3,020  |               | $ | 3,389 
|Europe/Africa     |  |                             | 1,535  |               |   | 1,584 
|                  |  |                             |        |               |   |       
|Total             |  | $                           | 4,555  |               | $ | 4,973 
|                  |  |                             |        |               |   |       
|                  |  |                            
|                  |  | June 30,2008                |        | March31, 2008
|Long-lived assets |  |                             |        |               |   |       
|North America     |  | $                           | 27,590 |               | $ | 27,420
|Europe/Africa     |  |                             | 660    |               |   | 623   
|                  |  |                             |        |               |   |       
|Total             |  | $                           | 28,250 |               | $ | 28,043
|                  |  |                             |        |               |   |       

The Company operates in one reportable segment and is engaged in the design, development, sale, and support of
four software product lines: 1) ChunkIt!, 2) XML Data Management Servers (XDMS), 3) Multidimensional Database Management Systems (MDMS), and 4) Rapid Application Development (RAD) software tools.
The ChunkIt! product was released for private beta testing in April 2008. To date, we have not recognized any revenue from the ChunkIt! product. The following table represents the net revenue from the Companys segment by its databases (XDMS
and MDMS) and RAD product lines (in thousands):



|          |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|--------- |  | --------------------------- | ----- | ---- | - | -----
|          |  | Three Months Ended June 30,
|          |  | 2008                        |       | 2007
|Databases |  | $                           | 3,278 |      | $ | 3,970
|RAD Tools |  |                             | 1,277 |      |   | 1,003
|          |  |                             |       |      |   |      
|Total     |  | $                           | 4,555 |      | $ | 4,973
|          |  |                             |       |      |   |      

7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is subject from time to time to litigation, claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business. As of June 30, 2008 the Company
was a party to the following legal proceedings:

1. Raining Data v. Intrametrics. On or about January 19, 2007, the Company
filed a complaint in Orange County Superior Court that sets forth allegations that Intrametrics threatens to and has misappropriated the Companys trade secrets. The Companys allegations in the complaint include that Intrametrics has
obtained the Companys source code in violation of the Parties OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) Distribution Agreement and in violation of Californias laws prohibiting the misappropriation of trade secrets. The Company seeks
injunctive relief from Intrametrics, including, but not limited to, compelling Intrametrics to fully comply with all of the termination provisions set forth in the OEM Agreement; enjoining Intrametrics and its employees and agents from using or
disclosing the Companys trade secrets; prohibiting Intrametrics from soliciting the Companys current or potential customers for 3 years, and from soliciting or employing certain of the Companys former employees for 3 years.
Intrametrics filed a motion to quash the Complaint, which the Company opposed, but on the morning of the hearing, Intrametrics first notified the Company that it filed Chapter 11



9



---

##### Table of Contents

bankruptcy, effectively staying the litigation in Orange County Superior Court. In March of 2008, the Company commenced discovery in the Bankruptcy matter.
In April 2008, the Bankruptcy matter was converted to Chapter 7. The Company is pursuing further discovery and potential litigation in the Bankruptcy court in Houston, TX.

2. Raining Data v. Soheil Raissi (formerly the Companys Vice President, Product Development and Professional Services), Mario Barrenechea
(formerly the Companys Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Marketing, Pick and Omnis Products), and Adevnet. On or about December 8, 2006, the Company filed a complaint in Orange County Superior Court that sets forth
allegations that the defendants threaten to and have misappropriated the Companys trade secrets. The Companys allegations in the complaint include that the individual defendants have used or disclosed the Companys trade secrets (in
the form of source code and licenses and other trade secret information) in violation of their agreements with the Company to maintain the confidentiality of such trade secret information, and in violation of California laws prohibiting the
misappropriation of trade secrets. The Company seeks injunctive relief from the defendants, including, but not limited to, compelling the defendants to immediately return all of the Companys trade secrets and property; enjoining the defendants
and their employees and agents from using or disclosing the Companys trade secrets, including the Companys source code; ordering the defendants to disclose all gains and profits they have derived from the misappropriation of the
Companys trade secrets; enjoining the defendants from directly or indirectly supplying, selling or promoting any product that incorporates the Companys trade secrets. On June 27, 2008, the Court granted the Companys Motion to
File a Second Amended Complaint, adding claims for Breach of the Duty of Loyalty and for Unjust Enrichment against the Defendants. Also, since the Court granted Plaintiffs special motion to strike (as set forth in paragraph 3 below), the
Company has commenced discovery in this action. The Company will continue to vigorously pursue its rights in this litigation.

3.
Cross-Complaint by Soheil Raissi, Mario Barrenechea and Adevnet v. Raining Data. On or about January 10, 2007, the defendants in the case above filed a cross-complaint, alleging several claims against the Company and Carlton Baab, the
Companys President and Chief Executive Officer, unfair business practices, violation of civil rights, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, negligent interference with prospective economic advantage, malicious
prosecution, abuse of process, negligence, civil conspiracy, and injunctive relief. Cross-complainants allege general, compensatory, special, and punitive and exemplary damages in amounts according to proof, and seek to enjoin the
Company from engaging in improper and unlawful conduct. The Company and Carlton Baab assert that all of the claims are baseless, and filed a special motion to strike all the allegations in the cross-complaint. On June 27, 2008, the Court
granted the special motion to strike, and thus struck the entire Cross-Complaint. The Company and Carlton Baab have thus filed a Motion for Fees and Costs related to their bringing their special motion to strike, which is scheduled to be heard on
August 29, 2008. Management believes that the ultimate disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements, results of operations, cash flows or liquidity.

Indemnification

The Companys
standard customer license and software agreements contain indemnification and warranty provisions which are generally consistent with practice in the Companys industry. The duration of the Companys service warranties generally does not
exceed 30 days following completion of its services. The Company has not incurred significant obligations under customer indemnification or warranty provisions historically and does not expect to incur significant obligations in the future.
Accordingly, the Company does not maintain accruals for potential customer indemnification or warranty-related obligations. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required to make is generally limited under the
indemnification provisions in its customer license and service agreements.



|ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). These statements may generally be identified by the use of such words as expect, anticipate, believe,
intend, plan, will, or shall, or the negative of those terms. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. Forward-looking statements
involve certain risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially from those discussed in any such statement. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements include the risks
described under the heading Risk Factors in Item 2 of this Form 10-Q and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q include, but are not limited to statements about the
following: (1) our future success, (2) our research and development efforts, (3) our future operating results and cash flow, (4) our ability to compete, (5) the markets in which we operate, (6) our revenue,
(7) cost of license revenue and cost of service revenue, (8) our selling and marketing costs, (9) our backlog, (10) our research and development expenses, (11) the effect of critical accounting policies, (12) our belief
that our existing cash balances combined with our



10



---

##### Table of Contents

cash flow from operating activities will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital expenditure requirements for the remainder of the fiscal year ending
March 31, 2009 and through the foreseeable future, and (13) our focus on the continued development and enhancement of the TigerLogic product line, and identification of new and emerging application areas and discussions with channel
partners for the sale and distribution of the TigerLogic product line. All forward-looking statements in this document are made as of the date hereof, based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update
any forward-looking statement.

Overview

We were incorporated in the State of Delaware in August 1987. We were originally incorporated as Blyth Holdings, Inc. and our name was changed to Omnis Technology Corporation in September 1997. Effective December 1,
2000, we completed the acquisition of PickAx, Inc., a Delaware corporation (PickAx). Concurrent with the acquisition, we changed our name to Raining Data Corporation. On April 17, 2008, we changed our name to TigerLogic
Corporation.

Products

Our principal
business is the design, development, sale and support of software infrastructure. Our products allow customers to create and enhance flexible software applications for their own needs. Our software may be categorized into the following product
lines: ChunkIt!, XDMS, MDMS and RAD software tools. All of our revenue to date has been derived from XDMS, MDMS and RAD software products.

Many of our products are based on the proprietary Pick Universal Data Model (Pick UDM) and are capable of handling data from many sources. The Pick UDM is a core component across the XDMS and MDMS product lines.

Beginning in 2001, we began an extensive effort to leverage our Pick UDM and core intellectual property to create the TigerLogic technology product line,
which includes an internet browser-based search application called ChunkIt! designed to enhance the search experience and productivity of any Web user, and an enterprise class XML Database Management Server for the emerging XML market to address the
growing need for managing and querying native XML data and the ability to handle structured and unstructured data. We are focused on the continued development and enhancement of this product line, identification of new and emerging technology areas
and discussions with channel partners for the sale and distribution of the TigerLogic product line.

TigerLogic ChunkIt!

In April 2008, we publicly released for beta testing an internet browser-based search application called ChunkIt! This application is
designed to enhance the search experience and productivity of any Web user. As an application that sits inside a Web browser, its function is to mine embedded hyperlinks that are commonly found on any Web page. ChunkIt! extracts the original content
related to the users keyword search terms from behind the links and brings the content to the surface for easy review. The content is presented in the form of easily digested chunks of information. To facilitate the review, each
keyword in the chunk is highlighted with a unique color.

This capability is useful not only for extracting search engine results, but for
viewing any Web page that contains hundreds, if not thousands of embedded hyperlinks. With a single click, ChunkIt! delivers users the benefit of being able to quickly determine and preview the links that contain information pertinent to their
searches. ChunkIt! can save users the time of having to click through a multitude of irrelevant links, and from having to manage multiple windows and tabs.

Users can download and install the beta version of the application at no charge at TigerLogics website, www.tigerlogic.com/chunkit. To date, we have not recognized any revenue from the ChunkIt! product.

TigerLogic XDMS

TigerLogic® XDMS is a high
performance, scalable, enterprise native XML database management server with both data- and document-centric capabilities. The TigerLogic XDMS difference comes from its core technology, a highly flexible data model that is optimal for managing and
storing any kind of XML or non-XML data and its high performance, extensible XQuery Engine. TigerLogic XDMS provides a level of efficient persistence that XML applications and transactions require, offering the benefits of roles-based security,
XA-compliant transactions, replication and high-availability for enhanced reliability. TigerLogic XDMS provides the benefits of an enterprise-scalable system that allows on the fly changes to content, recursion, and automatically optimizes storage.

TigerLogic XDMS supports an extensible and flexible development and deployment environment. Unlike other XML data management alternatives,
TigerLogic XDMS does not need to know the schema or structure of data before processing and storing it. We believe the ability to make XML schemas optional is a vital innovation because the structures of operational systems frequently change, and
mapping schemas for the purpose of linking to a new data source is both difficult



11



---

##### Table of Contents

and time-consuming. The system also enables support for schema versioning, which is critical when addressing evolving standards and XML schemas. The General
Availability Release of TigerLogic XDMS version 2.6, which included support for enhanced XQuery features, including XQuery stored procedures and full-text search and support for high availability clustering, was released in July 2006. Version
3.0, which is the third generation release of the product and includes compliance with the XML Query 1.0 specification, released in January 2007, cache management of data sources, in-memory cache, support for geospatial data, enhanced
application programming interfaces (APIs) and data replication was released for beta testing in June 2007. To date, our revenue from TigerLogic XDMS has been less than $300,000.

Multi-dimensional Databases (MDMS)

The MDMS product line consists principally of the D3 Data Base Management System (D3), which runs on many operating systems, such as IBM AIX, Linux and Windows NT. D3 allows application programmers to create new business
solution software in less time than it normally takes in many other environments. This can translate into lower costs for the developer, lower software prices for the customer and reduced costs of ownership for both the developer and end user. Our
MDMS products also include mvEnterprise, a scalable multi-dimensional database solution that allows the user to leverage the capabilities of the UNIX operating system, and mvBase, a multi-dimensional database solution that runs on all Windows
platforms.

MDMS components include FlashCONNECT a Web application programming interface which enables programmers to quickly implement a
Web browser interface for Internet, intranet and extranet for their applications, OpenDB and Open Data Base Connectivity (OBDC) connectors that allow the MDMS products to talk to ODBC-compliant databases and the Pick Data Provider for
..Net (PDP) and our Pick Reporting Services Connector. The PDP component for the Microsoft .NET Framework is tightly integrated with Microsoft Visual Studio .NET. It allows software developers using IBMs Universe and Unidata
databases and our D3 database platform to build client/server applications, Web applications or Web services using any of the languages and technologies that run on the Microsoft .NET Framework, such as Microsoft ASP.NET, Visual Basic .NET, Visual
C# .NET and Visual J# .NET. Our Pick Reporting Services Connector enables a data connection that allows Pick database users to unlock the benefits of Microsoft Reporting Services to take advantage of a comprehensive, server-based reporting solution
that can author, manage, and deliver both paper-oriented and interactive, Web-based reports. This solution also allows access to IBM UniVerse, IBM UniData and Pick D3 data.

Rapid Application Development (RAD) Tools

Our RAD products support the full life cycle of software application development and are designed for rapid prototyping, development and deployment of graphical user interface (GUI) client/server and Web
applications. The RAD products include Omnis Studio, Omnis Studio for SAP and Omnis Classic, and are object-oriented and component-based, providing the ability to deploy applications on operating system platforms such as Windows, Unix and Linux, as
well as database environments such as MySQL, Oracle, DB2, Sybase, Microsoft SQL Server and other OBDC compatible database management systems.

Technical
Support

Our products are used by our customers to build and deploy applications that may become a critical component of their business
operations. As a result, continuing to provide customer technical support services is an important element of our business strategy. Customers who participate in our support programs receive periodic maintenance releases on a when-and-if available
basis and direct technical support when required.

Sales and Distribution

In the United States, we sell our products through established distribution channels consisting of OEMs, system integrators, specialized vertical
application software developers and consulting organizations. We also sell our products directly through our sales personnel to end user organizations. Outside the United States, we maintain direct sales offices in the United Kingdom, France and
Germany. Approximately 34% and 32% of our revenue came from sales through our offices located outside the United States for the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

We sell our products in U.S. Dollars in North America, British Pounds Sterling in the United Kingdom and Euros in France and Germany. Because we
recognize revenue and expense in these various currencies but report our financial results in U.S. Dollars, changes in exchange rates may cause variances in our period-to-period revenue and results of operations in future periods.



12



---

##### Table of Contents

We generally license our software on a per-CPU, per-server, per-port or per-user basis. Therefore, the
addition of CPUs, servers, ports or users to existing systems increases our revenue from our installed base of licenses. In addition to software products, we provide continuing software maintenance and support and, to a limited extent, other
services to our customers, including professional services and training to help plan, analyze, implement and maintain application software based on our products.

Customers

Our customers may be classified into two general categories:



| |  |  | Independent Software Vendors and Software Developers. The majority of our revenue is derived from independent software vendors, which typically write their own
vertical application software that they sell as a complete package to end user customers. This category includes value added resellers (VARs) and software-consulting companies that provide contract programming services to their
customers.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Corporate Information Technology (IT) Departments.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------

For each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue.

Research and Development

We have devoted significant resources to the research and development of
our products and technology. We believe that our future success will depend largely on a strong development effort with respect to both our existing and new products. These development efforts have resulted in updates and upgrades to existing MDMS
and RAD products and the launch of new products including the TigerLogic product line. New product releases in all of our product lines are currently in progress. We expect to continue our research and development efforts in all product lines for
the foreseeable future. We intend for these efforts to improve our future operating results and increase cash flow. However, such efforts may not result in additional new products or revenue, and we can make no assurances that the recently announced
products or future products will be successful. We spent $2.2 million and $2.0 million on research and development for the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Competition

The application development tools
software market is rapidly changing and intensely competitive. Our MDMS products compete with products developed by companies such as Oracle, Microsoft and IBM. Our RAD products currently encounter competition from several direct competitors,
including Microsoft, and competing development environments, including JAVA. Competition is developing and evolving in the XML market for which our XDMS products are intended. Companies that do or are expected to compete in this market include
Oracle, IBM, Microsoft and Sybase, as well as a number of smaller companies with products that directly and indirectly compete with our XDMS products. Our ChunkIt! search application will encounter competition from several direct competitors
including Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, AOL and Ask, as well as a number of smaller companies with products that directly and indirectly compete with our ChunkIt! product. Most of our competitors have significantly more financial, technical, marketing
and other resources than we do. As a result, these competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies, evolving markets and changes in customer requirements, and may devote greater resources to the development, promotion
and sale of their products.

We believe that our ability to compete in the various product markets depends on factors both within and
outside our control, including the timing of release, performance and price of new products developed by both us and our competitors. Although we believe that we currently compete favorably with respect to most of these factors, we may not be able
to maintain our competitive position against current and potential competitors, especially those with greater resources.

Intellectual Property and
Other Proprietary Rights

We rely primarily on a combination of trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and contractual provisions to
protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights. Our trademarks include TigerLogic, ChunkIt!, Raining Data, Pick, D3, Omnis, Omnis Studio, mvEnterprise, mvBase, and mvDesigner, among others. We also have twelve pending U.S. patent
applications as of June 30, 2008.

We license our products to end users on a right to use basis pursuant to a perpetual
license agreement that restricts use of products to a specified number of users. We generally rely on click-wrap licenses that become effective when a customer downloads and installs the software on its system. In order to retain
exclusive ownership rights to our software and technology, we generally provide our software in object code only, with contractual restrictions on copying, disclosure, and transferability. There can be no assurance that these protections will be
adequate, or that our competitors will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

Backlog

We generally ship software products as orders are received and have historically operated with little backlog. As a result, our license revenue in any given quarter is dependent upon orders received and product shipped during the quarter.
Historically, there has been a short cycle between receipt of an order and shipment. Consequently, we do not believe that our backlog as of any particular date is meaningful.

Employees

At June 30, 2008, we had 128 employees worldwide of which 98 were in the United
States and 30 were in our international offices. Of the 128 employees, 99 are full-time and approximately 37% are in research and development, 16% in technical support, 31% in sales and marketing and 16% in general and administrative functions.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and disclosure of contingent liabilities.

On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition and accounting for goodwill. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We have identified the accounting policies below as the policies critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations.
We believe the following critical accounting policies and the related judgments and estimates affect the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

REVENUE RECOGNITION. We recognize revenue using the residual method pursuant to the requirements of Statement of Position No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition (SOP 97-2), as amended.
Under the residual method, revenue is recognized in a multiple element arrangement when company-specific objective evidence of fair value exists for all of the undelivered elements in the arrangement, but does not exist for one or more of the
delivered elements in the arrangement. At the outset of the arrangement with the customer, we defer revenue for the fair value of our undelivered elements (e.g., maintenance) based on company-specific objective evidence of the amount such items are
sold individually to our customers and recognize revenue for the remainder of the arrangement fee attributable to the elements initially delivered in the arrangement (e.g., software license) when the basic criteria in SOP 97-2 have been met.

Under SOP 97-2, revenue attributable to an element in a customer arrangement is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists and delivery has occurred, provided the fee is fixed or determinable, collectibility is probable and the arrangement does not require significant customization of the software. If, at the outset of the customer arrangement, we determine that
the arrangement fee is not fixed or determinable, we defer the revenue and recognize the revenue when the arrangement fee becomes due and payable. Service revenue relates primarily to consulting services, maintenance and training. Maintenance
revenue is initially deferred and then recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance contract, typically 12 months. Consulting and training revenue is recognized as the services are performed and is usually calculated on a time and
materials basis. Such services primarily consist of implementation services related to the installation of our products and do not include significant customization to or development of the underlying software code. We do not have price protection
programs, conditional acceptance agreements, and sales of our products are made without right of return.

For contracts that require
significant modification or customization to the software in accordance with customers specifications, we recognize revenue using the completed-contract method pursuant to the requirements of Statement of Position No. 81-1,
Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts. Under this method, revenue and expenses are deferred until customer acceptance of the finished product occurs.

GOODWILL. We assess the impairment of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable and at
least annually. Factors we consider to be important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:



| |  |  | Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Timing of our revenue, significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Significant negative industry or economic trends;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Our market capitalization relative to net book value.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



14



---

##### Table of Contents

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we do not
amortize goodwill, but test for goodwill impairment following a two-step process. The first step is used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its net book value (or carrying amount), including
goodwill. If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the
second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill with the carrying amount
of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting units goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in
the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. That is, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the
reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit. Currently, we have one reporting unit for goodwill impairment testing.

Determining the fair value of a reporting unit under the first step of the goodwill impairment test and determining the fair value of individual assets
and liabilities of a reporting unit (including unrecognized intangible assets) under the second step of the goodwill impairment test is judgmental in nature and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and
assumptions could have a significant impact on whether or not an impairment charge is recognized and the magnitude of any such charge. Estimates of enterprise fair value are currently based on our stock price as reported by Nasdaq given our single
reporting unit structure.

EMPLOYEE STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION. We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.Under the fair value recognition provisions of this statement, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized as expense over the
requisite service period. We estimate the fair value of stock-based awards using a Black-Scholes valuation model. Determining the fair value of share-based awards at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating volatility, expected terms,
and forfeitures. If actual results differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially impacted. See footnote 2 in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.

Results of Operations

The
following table sets forth certain Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations data in total dollars, as a percentage of total net revenues and as a percentage change from the same period in the prior year. Cost of license revenues and cost of
service revenues are expressed as a percentage of the related revenues. This information should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.



15



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                      |  |                                 |        |   |                                 |     |    |               |      |    |                |   |       |                  |  |     |   
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------------- | --- | -- | ------------- | ---- | -- | -------------- | - | ----- | ---------------- |  | --- | --
|                                                      |  | Three Months EndedJune 30, 2008 |        |   | Three Months EndedJune 30, 2007 |    
|                                                      |  | Results                         |        |   | % of NetRevenues                |     |    | PercentChange |      |    | Results        |   |       | % of NetRevenues | 
|                                                      |  | (In thousands)                  |        |   |                                 |     |    |               |      |    | (In thousands) |   |       |                  | 
|Net revenues                                          |  |                                 |        |   |                                 |     |    |               |      |    |                |   |       |                  |  |     |   
|Licenses                                              |  | $                               | 1,636  |   |                                 | 36  | %  |               | (18  | )% |                | $ | 2,002 |                  |  | 40  | % 
|Services                                              |  |                                 | 2,919  |   |                                 | 64  | %  |               | (2   | )% |                |   | 2,971 |                  |  | 60  | % 
|                                                      |  |                                 |        |   |                                 |     |    |               |      |    |                |   |       |                  |  |     |   
|Total net revenues                                    |  |                                 | 4,555  |   |                                 | 100 | %  |               | (8   | )% |                |   | 4,973 |                  |  | 100 | % 
|Operating expense                                     |  |                                 |        |   |                                 |     |    |               |      |    |                |   |       |                  |  |     |   
|Cost of revenues:                                     |  |                                 |        |   |                                 |     |    |               |      |    |                |   |       |                  |  |     |   
|Cost of license revenues (as a % of license revenues) |  |                                 | 4      |   |                                 | 0   | %  |               | (56  | )% |                |   | 9     |                  |  | 0   | % 
|Cost of service revenues (as a % of service revenues) |  |                                 | 448    |   |                                 | 15  | %  |               | (8   | )% |                |   | 485   |                  |  | 16  | % 
|Selling and marketing                                 |  |                                 | 1,827  |   |                                 | 40  | %  |               | 40   | %  |                |   | 1,304 |                  |  | 26  | % 
|Research and development                              |  |                                 | 2,232  |   |                                 | 49  | %  |               | 12   | %  |                |   | 1,997 |                  |  | 40  | % 
|General and administrative                            |  |                                 | 1,543  |   |                                 | 34  | %  |               | 17   | %  |                |   | 1,323 |                  |  | 27  | % 
|                                                      |  |                                 |        |   |                                 |     |    |               |      |    |                |   |       |                  |  |     |   
|Total operating expenses                              |  |                                 | 6,054  |   |                                 | 133 | %  |               | 18   | %  |                |   | 5,118 |                  |  | 103 | % 
|                                                      |  |                                 |        |   |                                 |     |    |               |      |    |                |   |       |                  |  |     |   
|Operating loss                                        |  |                                 | (1,499 | ) |                                 | (33 | )% |               | 934  | %  |                |   | (145  | )                |  | (3  | )%
|Other income (expense)-net                            |  |                                 | 45     |   |                                 | 1   | %  |               | (288 | )% |                |   | (24   | )                |  | 0   | % 
|                                                      |  |                                 |        |   |                                 |     |    |               |      |    |                |   |       |                  |  |     |   
|Loss before income taxes                              |  |                                 | (1,454 | ) |                                 | (32 | )% |               | 760  | %  |                |   | (169  | )                |  | (3  | )%
|Income tax provision                                  |  |                                 | 11     |   |                                 | 0   | %  |               | (42  | )% |                |   | 19    |                  |  | 0   | % 
|                                                      |  |                                 |        |   |                                 |     |    |               |      |    |                |   |       |                  |  |     |   
|Net loss                                              |  | $                               | (1,465 | ) |                                 | (32 | )% |               | 679  | %  |                | $ | (188  | )                |  | (4  | )%
|                                                      |  |                                 |        |   |                                 |     |    |               |      |    |                |   |       |                  |  |     |   

REVENUE

NET REVENUE. Our revenue is derived principally from two sources: fees from software licensing and fees for post contract technical support. We license our software on a per-CPU, per-server, per-port or per-user
basis. Therefore, the addition of CPUs, servers, ports or users to existing systems increases our revenue from our installed base of licenses. While the timing of orders and customer ordering patterns have resulted in some fluctuations in
license revenue between quarters and year-to-year, the $0.4 million or 8% decrease in total revenue for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year is a result of lower orders from our existing
customer base. Services revenue has remained relatively stable and consistent from period to period and we anticipate that services revenue will remain stable for the foreseeable future. In the longer term, we expect that the MDMS and RAD markets
will eventually contract as customers continue to adopt newer technologies and, therefore, the revenue generated from sales of our MDMS and RAD products is expected to decrease.

We have been actively developing and marketing our TigerLogic product line. Should our development efforts and the adoption of these product lines be
successful, we anticipate additional revenues in future periods related these products. However, we can give no assurances as to customer acceptance of any new products or services, or the ability of the current or any new products and services to
generate revenue. While we are committed to research and development efforts that are intended to allow us to penetrate new markets and generate new sources of revenue, such efforts may not result in additional products, services or revenue.

OPERATING EXPENSES

COST OF LICENSE
REVENUE. Cost of license revenue is comprised of direct costs associated with software license sales including software packaging, documentation, physical media costs and royalties. The slight decrease in absolute dollars for cost of license revenue
for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was due to decreased royalties. We anticipate that the cost of license revenue, as a percentage of license revenue and in absolute dollars, will
be relatively stable in future periods.

COST OF SERVICE REVENUE. Cost of service revenue includes primarily personnel costs relating to
providing consulting, technical support and training services. The decrease in cost of service revenue for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, when compared to the same period in prior year, is due to reduced headcount. We anticipate
that the cost of service revenue, as a percentage of service revenue and in absolute dollars, will be relatively stable in future periods.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

SELLING AND MARKETING. Selling and marketing expense consists primarily of salaries, benefits,
advertising, tradeshows, travel and overhead costs for our sales and marketing personnel. The $0.5 million increase in selling and marketing expense for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior
year, was due to additional personnel and increased marketing expense relating to the introduction of TigerLogic ChunkIt!, as well as stock compensation expense. We anticipate that selling and marketing costs related to the TigerLogic product line
may increase as we further develop the sales channel for these products and if customer acceptance of these products increases. In addition, if our continued research and development efforts are successful, including with respect to our TigerLogic
product line, and new products or services are created, we may incur increased sales and marketing expense to promote those new products in future periods.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development expense consists primarily of salaries and other personnel-related expenses and overhead costs for engineering personnel including employees in the US and the UK and
contractors in the US. The $0.2 million increase in research and development expense for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year was mainly due to consulting expense related to the TigerLogic
product ChunkIt!, offset by reduced headcount and termination of contracted professional technical services in India. We are committed to our research and development efforts and expect research and development expense will remain at the current
level in future periods or increase if we believe that additional spending is warranted. Such efforts may not result in additional new products and any new products, including the TigerLogic product line, may not generate sufficient revenue, if any,
to offset the research and development expense.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. General and administrative expense consists primarily of costs
associated with our finance, human resources, legal and other administrative functions. These costs consist principally of salaries and other personnel-related expenses, professional fees, depreciation and overhead costs. The $0.2 million increase
in general and administrative expense for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in prior year, was mainly due to costs incurred in legal services related to pending litigation matters and patents and
trademarks registration.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE). Other income (expense) consists primarily of net interest expense and gains and losses on
foreign currency transactions. The change in other income (expense) during the three month period ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the same period in the prior year, was mainly due to less interest expense as a result of the conversion of
certain long term debt into equity in October 2007 and April 2008, and foreign currency exchange gains. Due to the uncertainty in exchange rates, we may experience transaction gains or losses in future periods, the effect of which cannot be
predicted at this time.

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES. Our effective tax rate was (0.8%) and (11.2%) for the three month periods ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The provision for income taxes reflects the tax on earnings and dividends from foreign subsidiaries. Due to uncertainties surrounding the timing of realizing the benefits of the net operating loss
carryforwards in the future, we carry a full valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets in domestic and foreign jurisdictions, except France. As a result of our analysis of all available evidence, both positive and negative as of the end of
the fourth quarter of the year ended March 31, 2008, including sustained historical profitability in France, improved financial condition at the parent-level, and completion of a world-wide transfer pricing study, it was considered more likely
than not that a full valuation allowance for deferred tax assets in France was not required, resulting in the release of the valuation allowance previously recorded against our net French deferred tax assets of $460,000.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

In connection with
the acquisition of PickAx, we assumed a Secured Promissory Note issued to Astoria dated November 30, 2000, in the amount of $18.5 million. In January 2003, we entered into a Note Exchange Agreement (the Exchange Agreement) with
Astoria to replace the existing Secured Promissory Note, as amended, with a Convertible Subordinated Note. Under the terms of the Exchange Agreement, the Secured Promissory Note was exchanged and replaced with a Convertible Subordinated Note having
a principal amount of $22.1 million, which principal amount was equal to the outstanding principal and accrued interest payable on the Secured Promissory Note as of the date of the Exchange Agreement. In October 2005, Astoria assigned a portion
of its common stock holdings totaling 870,536 shares and a portion of the Subordinated Convertible Note, totaling $1,751,832, to two of its limited partners, GFAM and CAM. As such, we issued an Amended and Restated Convertible Subordinated Note to
Astoria for $20,749,581 and Convertible Subordinated Notes directly to GFAM and CAM for $862,979 and $888,853, respectively. The Convertible Subordinated Notes were convertible into common stock at any time, at the option of the holder, at a price
of $5.00 per share. The Convertible Subordinated Notes matured on May 30, 2008, extending the May 30, 2003 maturity date of the Secured Promissory Note.



17



---

##### Table of Contents

The interest rate of the Convertible Subordinated Notes was 5% per annum as compared to an interest rate of 10% per annum under the Secured
Promissory Note. The interest was payable quarterly at our option in cash or through increases to the outstanding principal of the Convertible Subordinated Notes.

On December 14, 2004, we entered into an Agreement Regarding Amended and Restated Common Stock Purchase Warrant and 5% Convertible Subordinated Note Due 2008 with Astoria whereby we could redeem, in part, the
Convertible Subordinated Note in advance of January 30, 2005. On December 14, 2004, Astoria exercised its warrant in the amount of $2,670,904. In lieu of a cash payment, we used the proceeds of the exercise to pay down a portion of the
indebtedness to Astoria. The pay down consisted of $247,129 for accrued and unpaid interest, and $2,423,775 as a reduction of principal of the Convertible Subordinated Note.

On October 4, 2007, the Company received a conversion notice from Astoria and on October 5, 2007, the Company received a conversion notice from
GFAM, each electing to convert its Convertible Subordinated Note in full. As a result, $22,917,000 of outstanding principal owed to Astoria under its Convertible Subordinate Note was converted into 4,583,400 shares of the Companys common
stock, and $981,000 of outstanding principal owed to GFAM under its Convertible Subordinated Note was converted into 196,200 shares of the Companys common stock. Per the terms of the Convertible Subordinated Notes, the Company made a cash
payment to Astoria and GFAM of approximately $13,181 and $1,264, respectively, for amounts outstanding under the Convertible Subordinated Notes that were not converted into shares of common stock. Following the conversion of such Convertible
Subordinated Notes and the cash payment to Astoria and GFAM, the Convertible Subordinated Notes held by Astoria and GFAM were cancelled. After the conversion by Astoria and GFAM, only CAMs Convertible Subordinated Note remained outstanding.

On April 10, 2008, the Company received a conversion notice from CAM on April 10, 2008 electing to convert its Convertible
Subordinated Note in full. As a result, $977,000 of outstanding principal owed to CAM under its Convertible Subordinated Note was converted into 195,400 shares of the Companys common stock. Per the terms of the Convertible Subordinated Note,
the Company made a cash payment to CAM of approximately $1,531 for the amount outstanding under the Convertible Subordinated Note that was not converted into shares of common stock. Following the conversion of such Convertible Subordinated Note and
the cash payment to CAM, the Convertible Subordinated Note held by CAM was cancelled and there are no Convertible Subordinated Notes outstanding subsequent to April 10, 2008.

Astoria is a major stockholder of ours, holding a majority of our outstanding common stock. Richard W. Koe, Chairman of our Board of Directors, serves as
the Managing General Partner for Astoria. Carlton H. Baab, our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors, served as a Managing Principal of ACM, which is a general partner of Astoria, until taking a formal
leave of absence to join us in August 2001. Gerald F. Chew, a member of our Board of Directors, is the cousin of Mr. Koe.

As of
June 30, 2008, we had $12.1million in cash and cash equivalents. We believe that our existing cash balances will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital expenditure requirements for the remainder of the fiscal year ending March 31,
2009 and through the foreseeable future. We are committed to research and development and marketing efforts that are intended to allow us to penetrate new markets and generate new sources of revenue and improve operating results. However, our
research and development and marketing efforts have required, and will continue to require, cash outlays without the immediate or short-term receipt of related revenue. Our ability to meet our expenditure requirements is dependent upon our future
financial performance, which will be affected by, among other things, prevailing economic conditions, our ability to penetrate new markets and attract new customers, market acceptance of our new and existing products and services, the success of
research and development efforts and other factors beyond our control.

On November 9, 2004, we entered into a lease agreement with
The Irvine Company whereby we leased one building in Irvine, California, comprising approximately 29,000 square feet, to replace our then headquarters facility. The lease commenced in November 2005 and has a five-year term.
If certain conditions are met, we have the option to extend the term of the lease for an additional thirty-six months. The total basic rent over the five-year term is approximately $2.6 million, which represents a lower per square foot
cost than our prior property lease. The annual basic rent during the five-year term ranges from approximately $475,000 during the first year to approximately $545,000 during the fifth year. The rent expense is being recognized on a
straight line basis over the lease term.

We had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of June 30, 2008.

Net cash used in operating activities was $1.6 million and $0.5 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
increase in net cash used in operating activities for the three month period ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in prior year was primarily due to lower revenue coupled with higher operating expenses mainly related to the
introduction of the TigerLogic ChunkIt! product. Net cash used in investing activities was $0.5 million and $0.0 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in cash used in



18



---

##### Table of Contents

investing activities was due to higher expenditures related to equipment purchased for the introduction of the TigerLogic ChunkIt! product. Net cash provided
by financing activities was $0.1 million and $0.0 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to proceeds derived from the exercise of
stock options.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION

EBITDA should not be construed as a substitute for net loss or as a better measure of liquidity than cash flow from operating activities, which are determined in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). EBITDA excludes components that are significant in understanding and assessing our results of operations and cash flows. EBITDA does not represent funds available for managements discretionary use and is not intended to
represent cash flow from operations. In addition, EBITDA is not a term defined by GAAP and as a result our measure of EBITDA might not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

However, EBITDA is used by management to evaluate, assess and benchmark our operational results and we believe that EBITDA is relevant and useful
information, which is often reported and widely used by analysts, investors and other interested parties in our industry. Accordingly, we are disclosing this information to permit a more comprehensive analysis of our operating performance, to
provide an additional measure of performance and liquidity and to provide additional information with respect to our ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditure and working capital requirements.

Our EBITDA was negative $0.9 million, or negative 21% of total net revenue for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, and
$0.2 million, or 4% of total net revenue for the three month period ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in EBITDA for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same period in the prior year was a result of decreased
license revenue and increased operating expenses relating to the introduction of the TigerLogic ChunkIt! product.

EBITDA is defined as net
income (loss) with an add-back for depreciation and amortization, non-cash stock-based compensation expense, interest income (expense)-net, other income (expense)-net, and income taxes. The following table reconciles EBITDA to the GAAP reported net
loss:

RECONCILIATION OF EBITDA TO NET LOSS

(In thousands)



|                              |  |                                    |        |   |      |   |      |  
|----------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ---- | -
|                              |  | For the Three Months EndedJune 30, |       
|                              |  | 2008                               |        |   | 2007 |  
|Reported net loss             |  | $                                  | (1,465 | ) |      | $ | (188 | )
|Depreciation and amortization |  |                                    | 106    |   |      |   | 65   |  
|Stock-based compensation      |  |                                    | 450    |   |      |   | 255  |  
|Interest (income) expense-net |  |                                    | (51    | ) |      |   | 202  |  
|Other (income) expense-net    |  |                                    | 6      |   |      |   | (178 | )
|Income tax provision          |  |                                    | 11     |   |      |   | 19   |  
|                              |  |                                    |        |   |      |   |      |  
|EBITDA                        |  | $                                  | (943   | ) |      | $ | 175  |  
|                              |  |                                    |        |   |      |   |      |  



19



---

##### Table of Contents

Our EBITDA financial information can also be reconciled to net cash used in operating activities as
follows:

RECONCILIATION OF EBITDA TO NET CASH USED IN

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

(In thousands)



|                                               |  |                                    |        |   |      |   |      |  
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ---- | -
|                                               |  | For the Three Months EndedJune 30, |       
|                                               |  | 2008                               |        |   | 2007 |  
|Net cash used in operating activities          |  | $                                  | (1,610 | ) |      | $ | (500 | )
|Interest (income) expense-net                  |  |                                    | (51    | ) |      |   | 202  |  
|Other (income) expense-net                     |  |                                    | 6      |   |      |   | (178 | )
|Change in trade accounts receivable            |  |                                    | (82    | ) |      |   | 369  |  
|Change in other current and non-current assets |  |                                    | 45     |   |      |   | 31   |  
|Change in accounts payable                     |  |                                    | 54     |   |      |   | (120 | )
|Change in accrued liabilities                  |  |                                    | 702    |   |      |   | 360  |  
|Change in deferred revenue                     |  |                                    | (18    | ) |      |   | (105 | )
|Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)          |  |                                    | (8     | ) |      |   | 139  |  
|Note payable discount amortization             |  |                                    |       |   |      |   | (21  | )
|Provision for bad debt                         |  |                                    | 19     |   |      |   | (2   | )
|                                               |  |                                    |        |   |      |   |      |  
|EBITDA                                         |  | $                                  | (943   | ) |      | $ | 175  |  
|                                               |  |                                    |        |   |      |   |      |  



|ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|------- | ----------------------------------------------------------

None



|ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|------- | -----------------------

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

A control system, no matter how well conceived and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the benefits of controls relative to their costs. Because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within the Company have been detected.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management has committed resources to remediate
the material weaknesses in our internal controls that existed at March 31, 2008. Management believes that these efforts have improved internal control over financial reporting. The following changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that have materially affected our internal control over financial reporting were identified during the quarter ended June 30, 2008:



| |  |  | Implemented additional review procedures in the tax provision calculation process to ensure that data used has been reconciled to tax returns filed by foreign
subsidiaries.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Improved review process of purchased assets to ensure recording and classification in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



20



---

##### Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION



|ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|------- | -----------------

The Company is subject from
time to time to litigation, claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business. As of June 30, 2008 the Company was a party to the following legal proceedings:

1. Raining Data v. Intrametrics. On or about January 19, 2007, the Company filed a complaint in Orange County Superior Court that sets forth
allegations that Intrametrics threatens to and has misappropriated the Companys trade secrets. The Companys allegations in the complaint include that Intrametrics has obtained the Companys source code in violation of the
Parties OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) Distribution Agreement and in violation of Californias laws prohibiting the misappropriation of trade secrets. The Company seeks injunctive relief from Intrametrics, including, but not
limited to, compelling Intrametrics to fully comply with all of the termination provisions set forth in the OEM Agreement; enjoining Intrametrics and its employees and agents from using or disclosing the Companys trade secrets; prohibiting
Intrametrics from soliciting the Companys current or potential customers for 3 years, and from soliciting or employing certain of the Companys former employees for 3 years. Intrametrics filed a motion to quash the Complaint, which the
Company opposed, but on the morning of the hearing, Intrametrics first notified the Company that it filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy, effectively staying the litigation in Orange County Superior Court. In March of 2008, the Company commenced discovery in
the Bankruptcy matter. In April 2008, the Bankruptcy matter was converted to Chapter 7. The Company is pursuing further discovery and potential litigation in the Bankruptcy court in Houston, TX.

2. Raining Data v. Soheil Raissi (formerly the Companys Vice President, Product Development and Professional Services), Mario Barrenechea
(formerly the Companys Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Marketing, Pick and Omnis Products), and Adevnet. On or about December 8, 2006, the Company filed a complaint in Orange County Superior Court that sets forth
allegations that the defendants threaten to and have misappropriated the Companys trade secrets. The Companys allegations in the complaint include that the individual defendants have used or disclosed the Companys trade secrets (in
the form of source code and licenses and other trade secret information) in violation of their agreements with the Company to maintain the confidentiality of such trade secret information, and in violation of California laws prohibiting the
misappropriation of trade secrets. The Company seeks injunctive relief from the defendants, including, but not limited to, compelling the defendants to immediately return all of the Companys trade secrets and property; enjoining the defendants
and their employees and agents from using or disclosing the Companys trade secrets, including the Companys source code; ordering the defendants to disclose all gains and profits they have derived from the misappropriation of the
Companys trade secrets; enjoining the defendants from directly or indirectly supplying, selling or promoting any product that incorporates the Companys trade secrets. On June 27, 2008, the Court granted The Companys Motion to
File a Second Amended Complaint, adding claims for Breach of the Duty of Loyalty and for Unjust Enrichment against the Defendants. Also, since the Court granted Plaintiffs special motion to strike (as set forth in paragraph 3 below), the
Company has commenced discovery in this action. The Company will continue to vigorously pursue its rights in this litigation.

3.
Cross-Complaint by Soheil Raissi, Mario Barrenechea and Adevnet v. Raining Data. On or about January 10, 2007, the defendants in the case above filed a cross-complaint, alleging several claims against the Company and Carlton Baab, the
Companys President and Chief Executive Officer, unfair business practices, violation of civil rights, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, negligent interference with prospective economic advantage, malicious
prosecution, abuse of process, negligence, civil conspiracy, and injunctive relief. Cross-complainants allege general, compensatory, special, and punitive and exemplary damages in amounts according to proof, and seek to enjoin the
Company from engaging in improper and unlawful conduct. The Company and Carlton Baab assert that all of the claims are baseless, and filed a special motion to strike all the allegations in the cross-complaint. On June 27, 2008, the Court
granted the special motion to strike, and thus struck the entire Cross-Complaint. The Company and Carlton Baab have thus filed a Motion for Fees and Costs related to their bringing their special motion to strike, which is scheduled to be heard on
August 29, 2008. Management believes that the ultimate disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements, results of operations, cash flows or liquidity.



|ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS
|-------- | ------------

We operate in a rapidly changing
environment that involves numerous risks and uncertainties. The following section lists some, but not all, of these risks and uncertainties that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operation.

IF WE DO NOT DEVELOP NEW PRODUCTS AND ENHANCE EXISTING PRODUCTS TO KEEP PACE WITH RAPIDLY CHANGING TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY STANDARDS, OUR REVENUE
MAY DECLINE.

We have devoted significant resources to the research and development of products and technologies. We believe that
our future success will depend in large part on a strong research and development effort with respect to both our existing and new products. Beginning in 2001, we began an extensive effort to leverage our time-proven Pick UDM and core intellectual



21



---

##### Table of Contents

property to create the TigerLogic product line, which includes an internet browser-based search application called ChunkIt! and an enterprise class XML
database management server for the emerging XML market. While we intend for these efforts to improve our future operating results and increase cash flow, such new products may not be successful or generate significant revenue. The development of new
or enhanced software products is a complex and uncertain process requiring high levels of innovation, as well as accurate anticipation of customer and technical trends. In developing new products and services, we may fail to develop and market
products that respond to technological changes or evolving industry standards in a timely or cost-effective manner, or experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and marketing of these new products.
The development and introduction of new or enhanced products also requires us to manage the transition from older products in order to minimize disruptions in customer ordering patterns and to ensure that adequate supplies of new products can be
delivered to meet customer demand. Failure to develop and introduce new products, or enhancements to existing products, in a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, or lack of customer acceptance of our
products, will materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

OUR FAILURE TO COMPETE EFFECTIVELY
MAY HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON OUR OPERATING RESULTS.

The market for our products is highly competitive, diverse and subject to
rapid change. Our products and services compete on the basis of the following key characteristics: performance; inter-operability; scalability; functionality; reliability; pricing; post sale customer support; quality; compliance with industry
standards; and overall total cost of ownership.

The application development tools software market is rapidly changing and intensely
competitive. Our MDMS products compete with products developed by companies such as Oracle, Microsoft and IBM. Our RAD products currently encounter competition from several direct competitors, including Microsoft, and competing development
environments, including JAVA. Competition is developing and evolving in the XML market for which our XDMS products are intended. Companies that do or are expected to compete in this market include Oracle, IBM, Microsoft and Sybase, as well as a
number of smaller companies with products that directly and indirectly compete with our XDMS products. Our ChunkIt! search application will encounter competition from several direct competitors including Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, AOL and Ask, as
well as a number of smaller companies with products that directly and indirectly compete with our ChunkIt! product. Additionally, as we expand our business, we expect to compete with a different group of companies, including smaller, highly focused
companies offering single products.

Most of our competitors have significantly more financial, technical, marketing and other resources
than we do. As a result, these competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies, evolving markets and changes in customer requirements and may devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products. While we currently believe that our products and services compete favorably in the marketplace, our products and services could fall behind marketplace demands at any time. If we fail to address the competitive challenges, our business
would suffer materially.

BECAUSE THE MARKET FOR OUR MDMS AND RAD PRODUCTS MAY BE DECLINING, OUR REVENUE MAY DECLINE IF WE CANNOT MAINTAIN OUR
SALES TO EXISTING CUSTOMERS OR GENERATE SALES TO NEW CUSTOMERS.

We believe that the markets for our MDMS and RAD products may be
declining as customers adopt other technologies. As a result, to maintain or grow our revenue in these markets, we will need to maintain or grow our sales to existing customers and to generate sales to new customers, including corporate development
teams, commercial application developers, system integrators, independent software vendors and independent consultants. If we fail to attract new customers, if we lose our customers to competitors, or if the MDMS or RAD markets decline, our revenue
may be adversely affected. In the longer term, it is expected that the MDMS and RAD markets will eventually decline as customers adopt newer technologies.

OUR PRODUCTS HAVE A LONG SALES CYCLE WHICH COULD RESULT IN DELAYS IN THE RECEIPT OF REVENUE.

The sales cycle for our MDMS
and RAD products typically ranges from three to nine months or longer and the sales cycle for our XDMS products is anticipated to be significantly longer since these markets are emerging and the products are still in the process of being adopted by
the marketplace. The adoption cycle for our ChunkIt! product is anticipated to be long since the search market currently has much larger direct competitors such as Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, AOL and Ask. Our products are typically used by application
developers, system integrators and value added resellers to develop applications that are critical to their corporate end users business. Because our products are often part of an end users larger business process, re-engineering
initiative, or implementation of client/server or web-based computing, the end users frequently view



22



---

##### Table of Contents

the purchase of our products as part of a long-term strategic decision regarding the management of their workforce-related operations and expenditures. Thus,
this sometimes results in end users taking a significant period of time to assess alternative solutions by competitors or to defer a purchase decision as a result of an unrelated strategic issue beyond our control. As a result, a significant period
of time may elapse between our research and development efforts and recognition of revenue, if any.

THE CONCENTRATION OF OUR STOCK OWNERSHIP GIVES
CERTAIN STOCKHOLDERS SIGNIFICANT CONTROL OVER OUR BUSINESS.

As of June 30, 2008, Astoria beneficially owned approximately 56% of
our outstanding common stock. Richard W. Koe, Chairman of the Board of Directors, serves as the Managing General Partner for ACM, which is a general partner of Astoria. Carlton H. Baab, our President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director,
served as a Managing Principal of ACM until taking a formal leave of absence to join us in August 2001. This concentration of stock ownership allows Astoria, acting alone, to block any actions that require approval of our stockholders,
including the election of members to the Board of Directors and the approval of significant corporate transactions. Moreover, this concentration of ownership may delay or prevent a change in control.

WE MAY EXPERIENCE QUARTERLY FLUCTUATIONS IN OPERATING RESULTS, WHICH MAY RESULT IN VOLATILITY OF OUR STOCK PRICE.

We expect to continue to spend substantial amounts of money in the area of research and development, sales and marketing and operations in order to
promote new product development and introduction. Because the expenses associated with these activities are relatively fixed in the short-term, we may be unable to timely adjust spending to offset any unexpected shortfall in revenue growth or any
decrease in revenue levels. Operating results may also fluctuate due to factors such as:



| |  |  | the size and timing of customer orders;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in pricing policies by us or our competitors;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our ability to develop, introduce, and market new and enhanced versions of our products;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the number, timing, and significance of product enhancements and new product announcements by our competitors;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the demand for our products;
| | - |  | ----------------------------



| |  |  | non-renewal of customer support agreements;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------



| |  |  | software defects and other product quality problems; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | personnel changes.
| | - |  | ------------------

We operate
without a significant backlog of orders. As a result, the quarterly sales and operating results in any given quarter are dependent, in large part, upon the volume and timing of orders booked and products shipped during that quarter. Accordingly, we
may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unanticipated decrease in orders, sales or shipments. Therefore, any decline in demand for our products and services, in relation to the forecast for any given quarter, could
materially and negatively impact the results of our operations. As a result, our quarterly operating results may fluctuate, which may cause our stock price to be volatile. In addition, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating
results should not be relied upon as indications of future performance.

THE SUCCESS OF OUR BUSINESS DEPENDS IN PART UPON OUR ABILITY TO RECRUIT
AND RETAIN KEY PERSONNEL AND MANAGEMENT.

The majority of our executive officers joined us subsequent to the acquisition of PickAx,
including our President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director, Carlton H. Baab, who joined us in August 2001. The loss of one or more of these or other executives could adversely affect our business. In addition, we believe that our future
success will depend to a significant extent on our ability to recruit, hire and retain highly skilled management and employees with experience in engineering, product management, business development, sales, marketing and customer service.
Competition for such personnel in the software industry can be intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel. If we are unable to do so, we may experience inadequate levels of staffing
to develop and license our products and perform services for our customers, which could adversely affect our business.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

THE INABILITY TO PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COULD HARM OUR ABILITY TO COMPETE.

Our ability to compete successfully will depend, in part, on our ability to protect our proprietary technology and operations without infringing upon the
rights of others. We may fail to do so. In addition, the laws of certain countries in which our products are, or may be, licensed may not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. We rely primarily on a
combination of trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights. Our trademarks include TigerLogic, ChunkIt!, Pick, D3, Omnis, Omnis Studio, mvEnterprise, mvBase, and
mvDesigner, among others. We also have twelve pending U.S. patent application as of June 30, 2008. In addition to trademark and copyright protections, we license our products to end users on a right to use basis pursuant to a
perpetual license agreement that restricts use of products to a specified number of users.

We generally rely on click-wrap
licenses that become effective when a customer downloads and installs software on its system. In order to retain exclusive ownership rights to our software and technology, we generally provide our software in object code only, with contractual
restrictions on copying, disclosure and transferability. There can be no assurance that these protections will be adequate, or that our competitors will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our
technology.

As further described in Part II, Item 1 hereof, the Company has filed complaints in Orange County Superior Court that
sets forth allegations that certain parties threaten to and have misappropriated the Companys trade secrets, including the possible release of certain source code.

OUR PRODUCTS MAY CONTAIN SOFTWARE DEFECTS WHICH COULD HARM OUR BUSINESS.

Our enterprise
applications software and internet browser-based search application may contain undetected errors or failures. This includes our XDMS and ChunkIt! products, which are at higher risk given these products are in the earliest stages of the product life
cycle. This may result in loss of, or delay in, customer acceptance of our products and could harm our reputation and our business. Undetected errors or failures in computer software programs are not uncommon. While we make every effort to
thoroughly test our software, in the event that we experience significant software errors, we could experience delays in release, customer dissatisfaction and lost revenue. Any of these errors or defects could harm our business.

IF ASTORIA OR OTHER SECURITIES HOLDERS REQUEST REGISTRATION OF THEIR RESTRICTED SECURITIES, OR THESE SECURITIES HOLDERS SELL A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF RESTRICTED
SECURITIES IN THE OPEN MARKET, OUR STOCK PRICE MAY DECLINE.

As of June 30, 2008, we had 26,481,679 outstanding shares of common
stock, of which approximately 15 million shares were restricted securities held by Astoria and other holders. Restricted securities may be sold in the public market only if they are registered or if they qualify for an exemption from
registration promulgated under the Securities Act. At present, all of our outstanding restricted securities may be registered or are eligible for public sale under Rule 144, subject to volume limitations and other requirements of Rule 144.

Sales of a substantial number of shares by Astoria or other securities holders in the public market, or the perception that those sales
may occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. In addition, if we register shares of our common stock in connection with a public offering of securities, we may be required to include shares of restricted securities in the
registration, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to raise capital.

OUR GLOBAL OPERATIONS EXPOSE US TO ADDITIONAL RISKS AND CHALLENGES
ASSOCIATED WITH CONDUCTING BUSINESS INTERNATIONALLY.

We operate on a global basis with offices or distributors in Europe, Africa, Asia,
Latin America, South America, Australia and North America and development efforts in North America and Europe. Approximately 34% of our revenue for the three month period ended June 30, 2008 was generated from our international offices. We face
several risks inherent in conducting business internationally, including but not limited to the following:



| |  |  | fluctuations in interest rates or currency exchange rates;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | language and cultural differences;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | local and governmental requirements;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------



| |  |  | difficulties and costs of staffing and managing international operations;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | differences in intellectual property protections;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | difficulties in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



24



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | seasonal business activities in certain parts of the world; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | trade policies.
| | - |  | ---------------

Any of these
factors could harm our international operations and, consequently, affect the international growth or maintenance of our business. These factors or any combination of these factors may adversely affect our revenue or our overall financial
performance.

THE FAILURE OF OUR PRODUCTS TO CONTINUE TO CONFORM TO INDUSTRY STANDARDS MAY HARM OUR OPERATING RESULTS.

A key factor in our future success will continue to be the ability of our products to operate and perform well with existing and future leading,
industry-standard enterprise software applications intended to be used in connection with our MDMS, RAD, and TigerLogic products. Inter-operability may require third party licenses, which may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all.
Failure to meet existing or future inter-operability and performance requirements of industry standard applications in a timely manner could adversely affect our business. Uncertainties relating to the timing and nature of new product announcements
or introductions or modifications of third party software applications could delay our product development, increase our product development expense or cause customers to delay evaluation, purchase, and deployment of our products.

THIRD PARTIES COULD ASSERT THAT OUR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES INFRINGE ON THEIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, WHICH COULD RESULT IN COSTLY LITIGATION, CAUSE
PRODUCT SHIPMENT DELAYS, PROHIBIT PRODUCT LICENSING OR REQUIRE US TO ENTER INTO ROYALTY OR LICENSING AGREEMENTS.

There has been a
substantial amount of litigation in the software industry regarding intellectual property rights. Third parties may claim that our current or potential future products and services infringe upon their intellectual property. We expect that software
product developers and providers of software applications will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our industry segment grow and the functionality of products in different industry segments
overlap. Any claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays, prohibit product licensing or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Royalty or licensing agreements,
if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all, which could seriously harm our business.



|ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|------- | -----------------------------------------------------------

As previously disclosed in the Companys periodic reports filed with the SEC, CAM was the holder of a 5% Convertible Subordinated Note with a maturity date of May 30, 2008. The interest rate of the Convertible Subordinated
Note was 5% per annum, payable quarterly, which was paid through increases to the outstanding principal of the Convertible Subordinated Note. The Convertible Subordinated Note was convertible into common stock, at the option of the holder,
at a price of $5.00 per share, at any time through May 29, 2008.

On April 10, 2008, the Company received a conversion notice
from CAM electing to convert its Convertible Subordinated Note in full. As a result, $977,000 of outstanding principal owed to CAM under its Convertible Subordinate Note was converted into 195,400 shares of the Companys common
stock. Per the terms of the Convertible Subordinated Note, the Company made a cash payment to CAM of approximately $1,531 with respect to those amounts outstanding under the Convertible Subordinated Note that were not converted into shares of
common stock. Following the conversion of such Convertible Subordinated Note and the cash payment to CAM, the Convertible Subordinated Note held by CAM was cancelled. As of the date hereof, no other Convertible Subordinated Note remains
outstanding.

The conversion into common stock constituted an exchange with existing security holders without payment for any solicitation,
and was therefore exempt from registration under Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.



|ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|------- | -------------------------------

None



|ITEM  4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|-------- | ---------------------------------------------------

None



25



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION
|------- | -----------------

None



|ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS
|------- | --------

Exhibits:



|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                       
|---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|31.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer.                                                                                                                             
|     | 
|31.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer.                                                                                                                             
|     | 
|32.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                    
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2008 |  |  |  | TIGERLOGIC CORPORATION                             
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas Lim                                     
|                      |  |  |  | Thomas Lim                                         
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer



27



---

##### Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                       
|---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     | 
|31.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                              
|     | 
|31.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                              
|     | 
|32.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



28