T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T F L O R E N T I N A MA R I N E L A A V R A M, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e y G e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 71345 A ge nc y N o. A 078- 184- 759 ME MOR AN DU M *

F L O R E N T I N A MA R I N E L A A V R A M, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e y G e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 72849 A ge nc y N o. A 078- 184- 759

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r d o f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls 

# FI LED JU N 23 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

T h e H o n o r ab le T im o th y M . T y m k o v ic h , C ir c u it J u d g e f o rth e T e n th ** * C i r c ui tC ourtof

A ppe a l s , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. 06- 71345 2 S ubm i tt e d J une 18, 2010 ** S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B e f o r e : B YB E E , N. R . S MI T H, a n d T YMKO VI C H, C i rcu i tJu d g es. *** A ppe l l a ntF l or e nt i naM a r i ne l aA vr a m appe a l s the de c i s i on of the B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ( B I A ) a f f i rm i ng he rr e m ovabi l i ty f ore ntry f r aud a nd de ny i ng he rr e que s tf

orw i thhol di ng of

r e m ova l . A vr a m ’ s c l a i m s of e rr ora r i s e m a i nl y f

r om act i o n s o f th e Im m i g rat i o n Ju d g e (IJ) relat i n g t o h i s fi n d i n g th atsh e w as al so r e m ovabl e f

orm a rr i a ge f

r aud. A vr a m c l a i m s the I J vi ol a t e d he rdue pr oc e s s r i ght s w he n he a dm i tt e d a he a r s a y s t a t e m e ntf

r om he re x- hus ba nd w i thoutm a ki ng a ny a tt e m ptt o pr oc ur e the de c l a r a ntf

orc r os s - e xa m i na t i on, c i t i ng ourde c i s i ons i n H erna ndez -G ua da rram a v. A s h c r o ft , 394 F . 3d 674, 681 ( 9th C i r . 2005) , a nd Sa i da n e v . I NS , 129 F . 3d 1063, 1066 ( 9th C i r . 1997) . W e r e vi e w due pr oc e s s c ha l l e nge s i n i m m i gr a t i on p ro ceed i n g s de no vo . Zet i no v. H older , 59 6 F . 3d 51 7 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). H ow ever , the pa rty c l a i m i ng adue pr oc e s s vi ol a t i on m us ta l s o s how tha tthe a l l e ge d e rr or prej ud i ce d h er— i n o ther w ords, the party m ustshow that“ the IJ ’ s c on du ct06- 71345 3 po t ent i al l y a ff

ec t ed the ou t com e of the proceedi ng s. ” Ca n o -Me r i da v . I NS , 311 F . 3d 96 0, 96 5 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( i nt ernal pu nctuat i on om i tt ed). E ve n i f w e a s s um e tha tthe I J ’ s de c i s i on t o a dm i tthi s he a r s a y s t a t e m e nt vi ol at ed A vram ’ s due proces s and st atut ory r i gh t s t o cross -e xam i ne w i tness es agai nsther, she has no tshow n thi s e rr or af fe ct ed the det erm i nat i on thatshe w as r e m o v ab le . B e c au s e A v r a m h a s n o t c h a lle n g e d th e f in d in g th a t s h e w a s r e m o v ab le for e ntryfr aud, and b ec ause the re cord cl earl y s up po rt s thi s f i nd i ng , she has fa i l ed t o d em on stra t e pre

j ud i ce . L i kew i se , A vram ’ s c l ai m s thather Mi r anda ri gh t s w er e vi ol at ed ar e un avai l i ng . E ven i f A vram w as ent i t l ed t o a Mi r anda w arn i n g d u ri n g h er v i sa i nt ervi ew un der U

ni ted Stat es v. Chen , 439 F . 3d 1037, 1042 ( 9th C i r . 2006) (i m m i grat i on offi ci al s s ho ul d g i ve Mi r anda w a rn in g s d u r in g in te rv ie w s if th e r e is an “ es peci al l y hei gh t ened ri sk” of prose cut i on ), the prot ec t i on s of Mi r anda w er e no tappl i cabl e t o h erdepo rt at i on proceedi ng because “ depo rt at i on proceedi ng s are no tcr i m i nal prosec ut i on s, bu tar e c i vi l i n n ature. ” U ni te d State s v . Sal

gado , 292 F . 3d 1169, 1173 ( 9th C i r . 2002) . N orw a s s he e nt i t l e d t o Mi r anda w a rni ngs dur i ng h e rd e p o rta tio n h e a r in g . I d. A dd i t i on al l y, A vram as se rt s thatshe w as el i gi bl e f or cancel l at i on of re m ov al for batt er ed spou se s. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o add re ss thi s i ss ue, because s he fa i l ed06- 71345 4 to r a is e it to th e B I A . Se e Co rdo n - G a r c i a v . I NS , 20 4 F . 3d 98 5, 98 8 (9th C i r. 20 00 ). F i na l l y , w e r e vi e w the B I A ’ s de c i s i on t o de ny w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l f

or s u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e . Ze t i no , 5 9 6 F .3 d a t 5 2 2 . I t is th e b u r d e n o f th e ap p lic a n t to s u p p ly s u f

f ic ie n t e v id e n c e o f

p a s t o rlik e ly f

u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n to s u p p o rt a w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l c la im . I

d. at52 7. T he B IA ’ s det erm i nat i on thatA vram w a s n o t e lig ib le f

o rth is f o rm o f r e lie f w a s “s u p p o rte d b y r e a s o n ab le , s u b s ta n tia l, and p robat i ve evi dence on the re cord consi dere d as aw ho l e, ” i d. , a n d th e r e f o r e we w ill n o t d is tu rb it o n ap p e a l. DE NI E D.