alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VII (the “Fund”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.











/s/Kenneth J. Cutillo


Kenneth J. Cutillo


Principal Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer


Arch Street VIII, Inc. as


Managing General Partner of


Boston Financial Tax Credit Fund VII,


A Limited Partnership








Date:           June 29, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 274 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 274

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an incentive to 
                       hire unemployed veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 16, 2009

  Mr. Baucus introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an incentive to 
                       hire unemployed veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Jobs Opportunity Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. INCENTIVE TO HIRE UNEMPLOYED VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (d) of section 51 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(14) Credit allowed for unemployed veterans hired in 2009 
        or 2010.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Any unemployed veteran who 
                begins work for the employer during 2009 or 2010 shall 
                be treated as a member of a target group for purposes 
                of this subpart.
                    ``(B) Unemployed veteran.--For purposes of this 
                paragraph, the term `unemployed veteran' means any 
                veteran (as defined in paragraph (3)(B), determined 
                without regard to clause (ii) thereof) who is certified 
                by the designated local agency as--
                            ``(i) having been discharged or released 
                        from active duty in the Armed Forces during 
                        2008, 2009, or 2010, and
                            ``(ii) being in receipt of unemployment 
                        compensation under State or Federal law for not 
                        less than 4 weeks during the 1-year period 
                        ending on the hiring date.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to individuals who begin work for the employer after December 31, 
2008.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the twelve-month period ended March 28, 2010 of Sport Chalet, Inc. (the "Company") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.




Date:  June 7, 2011


/s/Craig L. LevraChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President/s/   Howard K. KaminskyExecutive Vice President-Finance,

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sport Chalet, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 820807
<NAME> FFCA INVESTOR SERVICES CORPORATION 88-C
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 54060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Kidney Transplant Rejection 
Mechanism.
    Date: November 12, 2009.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Priti Mehrotra, Ph.D, Chief, Immunology Review 
Branch, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3138, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-435-9369, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87f7eab6b2bfe5c7e9eeefa9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="40302d71757822002e29286e272f36">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)


Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-25288 Filed 10-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth J. Gartler, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 904]

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered January 26, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of driving while intoxicated, a class E felony, and driving while ability impaired.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed for reasons stated in the decision at County Court.

Present—Smith, J.P, Fahey, Peradotto, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.
EX-10.2



 





Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT TO

BOB EVANS FARMS, INC. AND AFFILIATES

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE DEFERRAL PROGRAM




     WHEREAS, Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (“Corporation”) maintains the Bob Evans Farms, Inc. and
Affiliates Executive Deferral Program (“Plan”), as amended from time to time, to provide deferred
compensation to a select group of its management or highly compensated employees;



     WHEREAS, capitalized terms that are not defined in this Amendment have the same meanings as in
the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to utilize certain transition relief that
(1) allows changes in the time and form of payments of amounts under the Plan which are subject to
Code §409A and guidance issued with respect thereto and (2) is described in guidance issued by the
Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department with respect to Code §409A;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2006, as follows:




“Notwithstanding any terms of the Plan to the contrary, solely for the purpose of elections
as to the time and form of payment of amounts under the Plan which are subject to Code
§409A, the Plan shall allow Members to make changes to the time and/or form of payment of
such amounts in calendar year 2006 and calendar year 2007, as permitted by the transition
relief provided in IRS Notice 2006-79, IRS Notice 2007-86 and the applicable Treasury
Regulations.”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is adopted this 14th day of November, 2007.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	BOB EVANS FARMS, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-29-1998
<CASH>                                            208
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                6,607 
<PP&E>                                        104,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                 42,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 85,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          20,556
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          117
<OTHER-SE>                                     59,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   85,953
<SALES>                                        38,522 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               38,522
<CGS>                                          12,172         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,172 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               21,961
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   360
<INCOME-TAX>                                      112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               248
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      248
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .02
        
 


</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3269

_____________________________

LESTER YARBROUGH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

April 17, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and MAKAR and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Lester Yarbrough, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
No. 917.

#### United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. *v.*Doheny, Administratrix.

March 16, 1942.

*Mr. JohnE. Patterson*for petitioner. *Mr. E. J. McCabe*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2605 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Propenoic acid, reaction products 

with o-cresol-epichlorohydrin-formaldehyde polymer and 3a,4,7,7atetrahydro-1,3-isobenzofurandione. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Propenoic acid, reaction products with o-cresol-epichlorohydrin-formaldehyde 

polymer and 3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-1,3-isobenzofurandione. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-PROPENOIC ACID, REACTION PRODUCTS 

4 WITH O-CRESOL-EPICHLOROHYDRIN-FORM5 ALDEHYDE POLYMER AND 3A,4,7,7A6 TETRAHYDRO-1,3-ISOBENZOFURANDIONE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2605 IS

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Propenoic acid, reaction 

products with o-cresolepichlorohydrin-formaldehyde 

polymer and 3a,4,7,7atetrahydro-1,3- 

isobenzofurandione (CAS No. 

186511–06–8) (provided for 

in subheading 3907.30.00) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 22, 2015

s1214 

# Order

Clerk December 22, 2015

150949

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150949

COA: 323819

Wayne CC: 96

- 004081

- FC

DANIEL F. JONES

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4 , 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of

Montgomery v Louisiana , cert gtd __ US __; 135 S Ct 1546; 191 L Ed 2d 635 (2015), is

pending before the United States Supreme Court, and that the decision i n that case may

resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the

application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
Form of Hawker Beechcraft, Inc. Election Agreement



 Exhibit 10.13 
 EXHIBIT A 
 FORM OF 
 HAWKER BEECHCRAFT, INC. 
 ELECTION AGREEMENT 
 This ELECTION AGREEMENT (the “Election Agreement”), is made as of March 20, 2007 (the “Election Date”), between
Hawker Beechcraft, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and the other signatory hereto (the “Participant”). 
 I hereby agree to purchase shares of common stock of the Company at a price of $10 per share in the amounts and on the dates set forth below, using the following consideration: 
 1. Cash on the closing date of the Company’s acquisition of the Hawker Beechcraft business (expected to occur on or about March 26, 2007) (the
“Closing Date”): $                . 
 In connection with such purchase, I agree to execute as of the date of purchase the Subscription Agreement substantially in the form attached as Exhibit Fl to the Prospectus for the Hawker Beechcraft, Inc. Employee Equity Investment Plan,
dated March 13, 2007 (the “Prospectus”). 
 2. Cash on or about April 26, 2007:
$                . 
 In connection with such
purchase, I agree to execute as of the date of purchase the Subscription Agreement substantially in the form attached as Exhibit F2 to the Prospectus. 
 3. Retention Program Amounts on the Closing Date: $                . 
 In connection with such purchase, I agree to execute as of the date of purchase the Restricted Stock Agreement substantially in the form attached as
Exhibit G to the Prospectus. 
 This Election Agreement is binding and irrevocable. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Election Agreement as of the date first written above. 
  

			
		 	  

	PARTICIPANT	 	HAWKER BEECHCRAFT, INC.

  

			
	  
 Name:
#### Deborah Etzion, Appellant, v Rafael Etzion et al., Respondents.

[978 NYS2d 57]

In an action, inter alia, for the rescission or reformation of a stipulation of settlement dated June 8, 2005, which was incorporated, but not merged, into a judgment of divorce referable to the plaintiff and the defendant Rafael Etzion dated August 16, 2005, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Marón, J.), entered March 6, 2012, which denied her motion for leave to serve a second amended complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, the plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a second amended complaint is granted, and the proposed second amended complaint is deemed served.

Leave to amend a pleading should be freely given absent prejudice or surprise to the opposing party, unless the proposed amendment is palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit *(see*CPLR 3025 [b]; *Faiella v Tysens Park Apts.,*LLC, 110 AD3d 1028 [2013]; *Gotlin v City of New York,*90 AD3d 605, 606-607 [2011]; *Lucido v Mancuso,*49 AD3d 220, 227 [2008]). In determining a motion for leave to amend a pleading, “a court shall not examine the legal sufficiency or merits of a pleading unless such insufficiency or lack of merit is clear and free from doubt” *(Faiella v Tysens Park Apts., LLC,*110 AD3d 1028, 1029 [2013]; *Young v Estate of Young,*84 AD3d 1359, 1360 [2011]; *Lucido v Mancuso,*49 AD3d at 227).

Applying this standard here, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff s motion for leave to serve a second amended complaint asserting three new causes of action to recover damages for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. The proposed new causes of action allege, inter alia, that, in light of the parties’ marital relationship and status as coshareholders of the defendant Variety Accessories, Inc., the defendant Rafael Etzion (hereinafter Rafael) owed the plaintiff a duty to disclose a May 2005 offer to purchase a warehouse *783property owned by a related entity, which was made only to him and was not information freely available in the public domain *(cf. Etzion v Etzion,*62 AD3d 646, 654 [2009]). These proposed new causes of action were not palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit. In addition, Rafael did not demonstrate that he would be unfairly prejudiced or surprised by the proposed new causes of action, which stem from his disclosure of the May 2005 offer during the course of discovery in this action *(see Faiella v Tysens Park Apts., LLC,*110 AD3d 1028 [2013]; *Young v Estate of Young,*84 AD3d at 1360; *Lucido v Mancuso,*49 AD3d at 232; *see also Jablonski v Jakaitis,*85 AD3d 969, 971 [2011]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a second amended complaint. Eng, RJ., Rivera, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.