alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 21

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF

ACTION PERFORMANCE COMPANIES, INC.


(as of November 30, 2002)


|                                              |  |                  |  | 
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | 
|                                              |  | State or Country
|                                              |  | of Incorporation
|Name of Subsidiary                            |  | or Organization 
|                                              |  |                 
|Action Corporate Services, Inc.               |  | Arizona         
|Action-Jumpstart,
L.L.C. (9)                  |  | Arizona         
|Action Performance Holdings GmbH              |  | Germany         
|Action Racing Collectables, Inc.              |  | Arizona         
|Action Sports Image, L.L.C.                   |  | Arizona         
|APC Europe GmbH (1)                           |  | Germany         
|APC Minichamps GmbH (1)                       |  | Germany         
|Action-McFarlane LLC (8)                      |  | Arizona         
|AW Acquisition, Inc.                          |  | Arizona         
|Castaway Collectables, L.L.C. (2)             |  | Arizona         
|Chase Racewear, L.L.C. (2)                    |  | North Carolina  
|Creative Marketing & Promotions, Inc.         |  | North Carolina  
|Danhausen GmbH (4)                            |  | Germany         
|goracing.com, inc                             |  | Arizona         
|goracing Interactive Services, Inc.(3)        |  | Arizona         
|Jeff Hamilton Collection, Inc.                |  | Arizona         
|McArthur Towel and Sports, Inc.               |  | Arizona         
|Minichamps GmbH& Co. KG (6)                   |  | Germany         
|Minichamps North America, Incorporated (6)    |  | Florida         
|Pauls Model Art GmbH & CoKG (7)              |  | Germany         
|RYP, Inc.                                     |  | North Carolina  
|Racing Collectables Club of America, Inc. (5) |  | Arizona         
|The Fan Club Company, L.L.C. (3)              |  | Arizona         
|Trevco Trading Corp.                          |  | Arizona         



---

|(1) |  | wholly-owned subsidiary of Action Performance Holdings GmbH         
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) |  | 80% owned subsidiary of Action Performance Companies, Inc.          
|(3) |  | wholly-owned subsidiary of Racing Collectables Club of America, Inc.
|(4) |  | 80% owned subsidiary of Action Performance Holding GmbH             
|(5) |  | wholly-owned subsidiary of goracing.com, inc.                       
|(6) |  | wholly-owned subsidiary of Pauls Model Art GmbH & CoKG             
|(7) |  | 80% owned subsidiary of APC Europe GmbH                             
|(8) |  | joint venture with TMP International, Inc.                          
|(9) |  | joint venture with Jumpstart,
L.L.C.
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clarence G. Simmons, III, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|/s/ Clarence G. Simmons, III                               
|Clarence G. Simmons, III                                   
|Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|March 6, 2006
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of China Digital Media
      Corporation (the "Company") for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Daniel Ng, Chief Executive Officer, and Lui Chi Keung, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify that:





*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates
      and for the periods presented.




/s/ *Daniel
              Ng*
            
            
            /s/ *Lui
              Chi Keung**Daniel Ng*
              *Director, President and Chief Executive Officer*
              
              *August 11, 2005*
            
            
            *Lui Chi Keung*
              *Director and Chief Financial Officer*
              
              *August 11, 2005*










This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section
      18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2558 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-ethylhexyl (4-chloro-2- 

methylphenoxy) acetate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. BURRIS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-ethylhexyl 

(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy) acetate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-ETHYLHEXYL (4-CHLORO-2-METHYLPHENOXY) 

4 ACETATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.54 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 2-ethylhexyl (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy) acetate) is 

8 amended by striking the date in the effective period col9 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2558 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Davidson, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 887]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), rendered January 13, 2011, convicting him of rape in the third degree and criminal sexual act in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his claim regarding the excessiveness of his sentence *(see People v Edmunson,*109 AD3d 621, 622 [2013]). The waiver also forecloses review of the defendant’s claim that his counsel was ineffective, since the alleged ineffectiveness does not implicate the voluntariness of the defendant’s plea of guilty *(see id.).*

The defendant’s remaining contention is not properly before this Court. Skelos, J.P, Balkin, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
**AFTO FORM 157, SEP 95 *(EF-V3)*                                                          PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE**

**AFTO FORM 157, SEP 95 *(Reverse)***
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

Effective January 1, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
approved an adjustment in the base salary of the Company's Chairman, CEO and
President as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Executive Officer                 Prior Base Salary       Approved Base Salary (1)
------------------------------          -----------------       --------------------
<S>                                     <C>                     <C>
Randall L. Herrel, Sr.                      $ 387,000                 $ 425,000
   Chairman, CEO and President
</TABLE>

(1) The approved base salary was effective beginning January 1, 2005.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westford Technology Ventures, L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Jeffery T. Hamilton, Chief Executive Officer of the
Partnership, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.



/s/      Jeffrey T. Hamilton
____________________________
Jeffery T. Hamilton
President, Hamilton Capital Management, Inc.

November 19, 2003
1

 

Summary

Questions or comments, contact Kirk Rothwell Aviation Safety & Training Advisor 208-387-5879 or mrothwell@blm.gov

BLM Aviation Safety & 

Training FY 2019

Zero Accidents FY19

Incident with Potential (IWP)

Aug 8, 2019 Dahl Creek, AK. Near Mid-Air, Bell 205 Helicopter and a Cessna 208. During departure 

from the airstrip the C-208 at approx.. 20 ft agl. had to bank right after take-off when a helicopter unexpectedly lifted and transitioned across the airstrip into the flight path of the C-208. Estimated 500 ft. 

separation. No injuries.

Safety Management 

Systems (SMS)

The BLM continues its dedication to SMS. Aircraft 

reviewed L48 & AK. 

28% of SEAT/FB 

37% of Helicopters 

13% of Air Tactical 

33% of Smokejumper 

FY20 goal to review 25-30% 

of all Ex-Use contracts in 

L48 & AK. 

SAFECOM Summary 

FY19 (Submissions)

 Helicopter (51) 1 submission per 161 Flt. Hr.

 SEAT/FB (11) 1 submission per 285 Flt. Hr.

 Fixed Wing (37) 1 submission per 360 Flt. Hr.

 UAS (21) 1 submission 

per 34 Flt. Hr.

Average for all types of aircraft: 1 submission per 206 

flight hours. FY18= 1/205 

Flt Hr.

Non-Fire Training (IAT)

 IAT course completions 

FY19= 4784, FY18= 4711 

 Course most often completed: A-100 Basic Aviation Safety, A-110 Transport of Hazardous Materials, A-200 Annual Mishap 

Review, A-116 General 

Awareness Security, M-3 

Aviation Management for 

Supervisors

Aviation Leadership Development Initiative (ALDI) 2017-2019 

Task Books completed: TFLD & ASGS. Participated: SMS/QA Review, Aircraft inspections with 

OAS, UAS Observer, ASAT. Shadowing/Exposure: NAO, NIFC Nat’l Fire Brief/NMAC, Aerial 

Firefighter Conference. College Courses: AV 120 Intro SMS, AV121 Risk Mgmt, AV123 Policy 

Promotion Legal. Program ended Fall 2019. New IM to be released Spring 2020 for next initiative.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Accidents 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 2 0

Accident Rate 0 0 6.6 7.8 6.6 0 0 4.25 7.18 0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0 BLM Accident & Accident Rate

2010-2019

Accidents

Accident Rate

Trendline

ZERO

ZERO

6.6

BLM 10 Yr. Avg.

3.47 accidents/100k 

flt. hrs.

6.6

7.8

ZERO

ZERO

4.25

ZERO

7.18

# of Accidents/100,00 Flt Hrs
2

Acronyms:

ALDI = Aviation Leadership Development Initiative

AK = Alaska

ASAT = Aviation Safety Assistance Team

ASGS (t) = Air Support Group Supervisor (trainee)

BLM = Bureau of Land Management

Ex-Use = Exclusive Use 

Flt = Flight

FW = Fixed Wing

FY = Fiscal Year

Hrs = Hours

IAT = Interagency Aviation Training

IWP = Incident with Potential

L48 = Lower 48 contiguous states

NTSB = National Transportation Safety Board

NV = Nevada

OAS = Office of Aviation Services

Safecom = Safety Communique

SEAT = Single Engine Air Tanker

SMS = Safety Management System

UAS = Unmanned Aerial System (drone)

USFS = United States Forest Service

WH&B = Wild Horse and Burro
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12865]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1146-000]


Lafarge Midwest, Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

May 27, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Lafarge Midwest, Inc.'s application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is June 17, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9fffcebfaf6d7d5d0d7dceaccc9c9d6cbcdf9dfdccbda97ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97d1d2c5d4d8f9fbfef9f2c4e2e7e7f8e5e3d7f1f2e5f4b9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>. or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12865 Filed 6-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (“PESI”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”), I, Ben Naccarato, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and




(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: March 11, 2011




/s/ Ben Naccarato


Ben Naccarato


Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer




This certification is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350 subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
#### Nat. Pump Cylinder Co. *v.*Gunnison.

*(Circuit Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.*

September 4, 1883.)

Patents for Inventions—Claim in Reissue Repeating Claim in Origínal Patent.

Where the claim in a reissue, while differing verbally from the claim in the original patent, is substantially and in legal effect a mere repetition of that claim, the claim in the reissue may be sustained.

*Gage*v. *Herring*2 Sup. Ct. Rep. 819; *Schillinger*v. *Greenway Brewing Co.*17 Fed. Rep. 244, followed.

In Equity. *Sur*demurrer to bill,

*John K. Hallock,*for demurrer.

*Mr. Taylor, contra.*

Acheson, J.

The *first, second,*and *third*grounds of demurrer go to the entire bill of complaint, and, if sustained, would require the ■court to hold that the reissued letters patent are void *in toto*by reason *813ol tlie alleged unwarrantable expansion of the claim. But it has been authoritatively decided that the invalidity of a claim in a reissue does not impair the validity of a claim in the original patent which is repeated and separately stated in the reissued patent. *Gage*v. *Herring,*23 O. G. 2119; [S. C. 2 Sup. Ct. Rep. 819;] *Schillinger*v. *Greenway Brewing Co. 24 O. G.*495; [S. C. *17 Fed.*Rep. 244.] Now, in the present case, the second claim of the reissue, while differing verbally from the first claim of the original patent, is, it seems to me, substantially, and in legal effect, a mere repetition of that claim; and therefore, under the authorities cited, such second claim may be sustained. The *fourth*ground of demurrer is conceded.

And now, September 3, 1883, the fourth ground of demurrer is sustained, but the first, second, and third grounds of demurrer are overruled, and leave is granted the defendant to answer within 30 days.
#### Habtu Hagos HABTEMICAEL, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Respondent.

No. 05-75118.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 16, 2006.

Filed Nov. 28, 2006.

*677Tom Youngjohn, Federal Way, WA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, WWS-District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service Office of the District Counsel, Christopher Lee Pickrell, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, Margaret K. Taylor, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: RYMER, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Habtu Hagos Habtemicael petitions for review of the summary affirmance by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of the decision by the immigration judge (IJ) denying his application for a waiver of inadmissibility under INA § 209(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1159(c), and ordering his exclusion and deportation. In addition, Habtemicael seeks review of subsequent proceedings before the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) regarding his request for a waiver of inadmissibility under INA § 212(h), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h). We lack jurisdiction to review proceedings that are independent of the final order of removal, and dismiss the petition insofar as it pertains to what happened before the USCIS. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1), (9). Otherwise, we deny the petition.

Habtemicael first suggests that we take judicial notice of events outside the *678administrative record before the IJ or the BIA, but we decline to do so as we must decide the petition only on the record on which the order of removal is based.

At oral argument Habtemicael abandoned any argument that the IJ denied him due process by neglecting to inform him of the possibility of an application for adjustment of status based on marriage.

Habtemicael’s remaining contention, that the IJ applied an incorrect legal standard in adjudicating the § 209(c) waiver, fails because the IJ did not convert family ties into a negative factor requiring a showing of countervailing equities, *Matter of Marin,*16 I. & N. Dec. 581 (BIA 1978), but simply found that family ties were not a basis of extreme hardship in his particular case. This is a finding that we have no jurisdiction to review. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B).

DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2649 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2649

      To suspend temporarily the duty on power electronics boxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on power electronics boxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POWER ELECTRONICS BOXES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Power electronics   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        box and static                                                     31/2011.......
                        converter
                        composite units,
                        combining the
                        functions of an
                        AC inverter and
                        an auxiliary
                        power module,
                        capable of
                        reducing DC
                        voltage from 42 V
                        (supplied by
                        battery) to 12 V
                        output and
                        providing three-
                        phase AC output
                        to motor
                        generator unit,
                        the foregoing
                        certified by the
                        importer for use
                        in hybrid
                        electric motor
                        vehicles
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8504.40.95)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```