alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26481-26482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12741]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, 
Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, July 7, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-
220-6095.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, July 7, 2009, at 1 p.m. Pacific time via telephone conference. 
The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written 
statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Dave Coffman. 
For more information please contact Mr. Coffman at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6095, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, 
WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.

[[Page 26482]]

    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: May 27, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-12741 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
O rder filed September 16 , 202 1



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ 

### No. 11

- 2 1

- 00 211

- C V

__________


### IN RE RIUS RENTALS, LLC AND FRANKLIN POHLMANN, Relators

O riginal Mandamus Proceeding

O R D E R In conjunction with an original mandamus proceeding, Relator s , Rius Rentals,
LLC and Franklin Pohlmann , ha ve filed in this court an opposed emergency motion to stay the trial court proceedings. This matter stems from Cause No. D

- 19

- 11

- 1455

- CV in the 3 58th District Court of Ector County, Texas

— a dispute arising from an automobile accident on June 29, 2018 . The petition for writ of mandamus specifically relates to two May 11, 2021 orders in which the Honorable John Shrode
denied Relator s ’ motion s to compel Real Party in Interest , Jaydon Darnes , to sign
authorizations t hat allow ed Relators to obtain driver’s license and driver’s training2 records, to produce cell phone records from the date of the accident, and to sign an
authorization t hat allow ed Relators to obtain the cell phone records. We have requested that Real Party in Interest file a response to the petition for writ of
mandamus. In the opposed motion for emergency relief, Relator s request that we stay the underlying trial court proceedings pending this court ’s determination of the merits of the petition for writ of mandamus. We grant the opposed motion for emergency relief and hereby stay all proceedings in the trial court pending further order of this court or final dispositi on of this mandamus proceeding. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10(b).

PER CURIAM

Date: September 16, 2021
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter , J. , and Williams , J.
#### Young Kyu Kim, Respondent, v Robert Gomez, Appellant.

[962 NYS2d 127]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered August 13, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment insofar as it sought dismissal of plaintiff’s claims alleging serious injuries under the “permanent consequential” and “significant” limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant made a prima facie showing of the lack of a serious injury to the cervical and lumbar spine by submitting the affirmed report of an orthopedic surgeon finding full range of motion in both parts of the spine, and a radiologist’s report finding that MRI and X ray films taken shortly after the accident showed bulging discs attributable to diffuse multilevel degenerative disc disease and an absence of traumatic injuries *(see Paduani v Rodriguez,*101 AD3d 470, 470 [1st Dept 2012]; *Spencer v Golden Eagle, Inc.,*82 AD3d 589, 590-591 [1st Dept 2011]). Defendant further argued that plaintiff had ceased treatment four months after the accident, without explanation *(Pommells v Perez,*4 NY3d 566, 574 [2005]).

In opposition, plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact by submitting the affirmed report of his treating physician who found contemporaneous and persisting limitations in range of motion, and explained his basis for concluding that the disc herniations and bulges shown on the MRI films were caused by the trauma of the accident, as opposed to degeneration *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 217-219 [2011]; *Mercado-Arif v Garcia,*74 AD3d 446, 446-447 [1st Dept 2010]). Plaintiff adequately addressed the gap in treatment by submitting an affidavit asserting that he stopped treatment because he could not afford to pay for it after the expiration of his no-fault benefits *(see Pindo v Lenis,*99 AD3d 586, 587 [1st Dept 2012]). Further, plaintiffs physician opined that plaintiff had failed to make a full recovery despite undergoing a comprehensive physical therapy program, which suggested that further treatment would have been only palliative *(see Ayala v Cruz,*95 AD3d 699, 700 [1st Dept 2012]).

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kanwarjit Singh, Appellant.

[962 NYS2d 811]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams Jr., J), rendered June 8, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of grand larceny in the second degree and criminal tax fraud in the fifth degree.

Defendant, the owner of a gas station and food mart, was involved in a scheme in which he, among other things, allowed customers to use food stamps for ineligible items and filed fraudulent tax returns. As a result, he was charged in an 18-count indictment with numerous theft-related crimes. In satisfaction thereof, he pleaded guilty to grand larceny in the second degree and criminal tax fraud in the fifth degree. During the plea proceedings, the People recommended that defendant be sentenced to concurrent terms of 3 to 9 years in prison on the grand larceny conviction and one year in jail on the tax fraud conviction, and that he make full restitution. County Court agreed with the terms of the plea bargain, but indicated that it was inclined to sentence defendant to 4 to 12 years in prison on the grand larceny conviction unless the parties made a convincing argument otherwise at sentencing. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant to concurrent terms of 4 to 12 years in prison on the grand larceny conviction and one year in jail on the tax fraud conviction, and directed him to make full restitution, which he had already paid. Defendant now appeals.

Defendant’s sole contention is that his sentence on the grand larceny conviction is harsh and excessive. Notwithstanding defendant’s lack of a criminal record and his payment of full restitution *(see People v Tesar,*65 AD3d 716, 717-718 [2009]), we are not persuaded that the sentence should be reduced. Defendant used his position as a business owner to engage in a *1215series of dishonest activities over the course of nearly two years for the sole purpose of enriching himself. Given the gravity of his misconduct, as well as the fact that he entered his guilty plea with the full understanding that he would likely receive a sentence of 4 to 12 years in prison on the grand larceny conviction, we find no abuse of discretion nor any extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice *(see People v Helstein,*95 AD3d 1564, 1564 [2012], *lv denied*19 NY3d 997 [2012]; *People v Birch,*56 AD3d 808, 809 [2008]).

Mercure, J.E, Stein, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

As of the date hereof, I, Kurt R. Kneip, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the  Quarterly  Report of Inter-Tel,  Incorporated.  on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter  ended March 31, 2003 fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or  15(d)  of the  Securities  exchange  Act of 1934 and that  information
contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of  Inter-Tel,
Incorporated.

                                        By: /s/ Kurt R. Kneip
                                            ------------------------------------

                                        Name: Kurt R. Kneip
                                              ----------------------------------

                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                               ---------------------------------

                                        Dated: May 12, 2003
                                               ---------------------------------
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 19, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00439

- CR

Chris topher J. PADILLA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR4827

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Extension of time to file the court reporter’s record is this date NOTED. Time is extended to

September 16, 2015.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Dayna L. Jones

1800 McCullough Ave

San Antonio, TX 78212

Sachiko Nagao

Of ficial Court Reporter for the 399th District Court

Cadena Reeves Justice Center

300 Dolorosa, Suite 1054

San Antonio, TX 78205 Nicolas A. LaHood

District Attorney, Bexar County

101 W. Nueva, Suite 370

San Antonio, TX 78205
ex10_1.htm


    Exhibit
      10.1

     

    


    Compensation
      Arrangements for S. Russell Stubbs

    November
      19, 2007 (effective January 1, 2007)

    


    


    The
      following is a summary of the compensation arrangement effective November 19,
      2007 (retroactive to January 1, 2007) for Stoney Russell Stubbs in his
      capacity as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Director
      of
      the Company.

    


    Annual
      Base Salary. $245,250

    


    Annual
      and Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plans. Participation in the
      Company’s Incentive Bonus Plan, the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2005
      Executive Bonus and Restricted Stock Plan.

    


    Benefit
      Plans and Other Arrangements. Mr. Stubbs is eligible to participate in
      the Company’s broad-based programs including health, disability and life
      insurance programs, the Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. 401(k) Savings
      Plan, and the FFE Transportation Services, Inc. 401(k) Wrap Plan, He is also
      eligible to participate in the Key Employee Supplemental Medical
      Plan.

    


    Change
      in Control Agreements. Mr. Stubbs and the Company entered into a Change
      in Control Agreement which entitles executive officers severance benefits in
      the
      event of a “change in control” of the Company during the term of his
      employment.

    


    Perquisites.
      Mr. Stubbs is eligible to participate in certain programs offered
      by
      the Company, including automobile mileage reimbursement for business purposes
      plus a $500 per month automobile allowance, and a Christmas bonus  not
      to exceed one week’s annual base salary.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Race-Based Social Stress and Health in the MADICS Longitudinal Study, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.                    

*Date:*                         June 16, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Michele C. Hindi-Alexander, PhD, Division of Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 1600 Executive Boulevard, Rm. 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-8382,                         *hindialm@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 15, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-12194 Filed 5-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000822084
<NAME> INNERDYNE, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,604,184
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,135,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                    95,604
<INVENTORY>                                  1,387,994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,546,972
<PP&E>                                       4,228,768
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,447,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,373,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,265,011
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       220,452
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,584,243
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,373,653
<SALES>                                     14,480,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,807,403
<CGS>                                        4,238,872
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,995,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                931,633
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,349
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            917,284
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   917,284
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
# Supreme Court of Florida

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2024

In Re: Amendment to Florida

Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 SC2021

- 0929

The Attorney General ’ s motion for rehearing is hereby denied.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and

SASSO, JJ., concur.

LABARGA, J., specially concurs with an opinion.

LABARGA, J., specially concurring.

Because the existing Florida Rules of Civil Procedure were

sufficient to address abusive discovery tactics, I dissented to the

a doption of new rule 1.280(h), which extended the apex doctrine to

the private sector. In re Amend. to Fla. Rule of Civ. Proc. 1.280 , 324

So. 3d 459, 464

- 67 (Fla. 2021) (Labarga, J., dissenting).

While I adhere to my dissent in that case as well as my diss ent

to this Court’s order allowing the new rule to remain as originally

adopted, I agree that the standard for rehearing has not been met in

this matter. Thus, I concur in the denial of rehearing.CASE NO.: SC2021

- 0929

Page Two

A True Copy

Test:

SC2021

- 0929 02/08/2024

SC2021

- 0929 02/08/2024

SO

Served:

JOSHUA E. DOYLE

HEATHER S. TELFER

JENNIFER MARIE VOSS

CHRISTOPHER J. BAUM

JUDSON LEE COHEN

WILLIAM W. LARGE

HON. ASHLEY MOODY

FRANK CRUZ

- ALVAREZ

ROBERT L. CHRISTIE

HENRY C. WHITAKER

KANSAS R. GOODEN

DANIEL B. ROGERS

DANIEL W. BELL

CHRISTOPHER G. BURNS

JOHN W. HOGAN
#### State v. Everette

Case below: 172 N.C. App. 237

No. 452A05

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA03-858)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

4. Def’s NOA (Dissent)

5. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 360 N.C. 69

2. Allowed 12/19/06

3. Allowed 12/19/06

4.—

5. Allowed 12/19/06

Tlmmons-Goodson, J., Recused
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the ManTech International Corporation (the
Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, George J. Pedersen, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Kevin M. Phillips, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    George J. PedersenName:

George J. PedersenTitle:

Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer


By:

/s/    Kevin M. PhillipsName:

Kevin M. PhillipsTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 17, 2008
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24E0036. MARCUS IVEY v. STATE OF GEORGIA.

Marvis McDaniel Ivey, a non-attorney purporting to act as next friend of

Marcus Ivey, has filed a motion pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 40 (c) seeking a

writ of mandamus directing the clerk of the DeKalb County Superior Court to file a

September 21, 2023 notice of appeal on behalf of Marcus Ivey.1 The motion is hereby

DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e ,

Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 We note that “[n]atural persons with no license to practice law are not

permitted to act as ‘attorneys’ and represent other natural persons in their legal

affairs.”Eckles v. AtlantaTech.Group, 267 Ga. 801, 804-805 (2) (485 SE2d 22) (1997).

December 07, 2023

12/07/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,754,503
<SECURITIES>                                     1,948,473
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,149,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                           2,361,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,591,055
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,338,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                          1,033,483
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         11,400
<COMMON>                                         1,100,286
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,931,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,338,959
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,171,547
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,031,721
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  53,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     86,797
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 86,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        86,797
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.00
                                               


</TABLE>