alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; BSPH Member Conflict Applications.                    

*Date:*                         October 23, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         3:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mark P. Rubert, Ph.D, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5218, MSC 7852, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1775,                         *rubertm@csr.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 13, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-25269 Filed 10-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2517 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2517

    To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2'-Dithioibisbenzothiazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2'-Dithioibisbenzothiazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,2'-DITHIOIBISBENZOTHIAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       2,2'-               Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          Dithioibisbenzoth                                                  31/2011.......
                          iazole (CAS No.
                          120-78-5)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2934.20.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Public Service Mutual Insurance Company et al., Respondents, v Tower Insurance Company of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[975 NYS2d 17]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered July 12, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, upon reargument of defendant Tower Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment declaring that it had no duty to defend and indemnify plaintiff 100-120 Hugh Grant Circle Realty, LLC (HGC) in the underlying personal injury action, adhered to the original determination denying the motion, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Tower’s obligation, if any, to reimburse plaintiff Public Service Mutual Insurance Company for fees incurred in defending HGC in the underlying action is not affected by the timeliness of its disclaimer of coverage, since Insurance Law § 3420 (d) does not apply to requests for defense and indemnification between insurers *(see Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc. v Royal Surplus Lines Ins. Co.,*27 AD3d 84, 92-93 [1st Dept 2005]). However, the record does not demonstrate conclusively that Tower received late notice of the claim and may disclaim coverage on that ground. In an affidavit by its senior liability examiner, *477Public Service explained that so much confusion was created by the conflicting pleadings, bill of particulars, and deposition testimony in the underlying action that it required six weeks of investigation to determine the facts of the accident and HGC’s liability. An issue of fact exists whether Public Service’s 48-day delay before issuing its demand to Tower was reasonable under the circumstances *(see Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v CNA Ins. Cos.,*99 AD2d 310, 313 [1st Dept 1984]). Concur — Gonzalez, RJ., Friedman, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Clark, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricky Trombley, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 193]

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Essex County (Meyer, J.), rendered October 4, 2012, which resentenced defendant following his conviction of the crime of assault in the third degree and the traffic infraction of consumption or possession of alcohol in a motor vehicle on a highway.

Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of, among other things, assault in the second degree. County Court sentenced him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate prison term of 6V2 years to be followed by two years of postrelease supervision. Defendant then pleaded guilty to a federal weapons offense and was sentenced to 2 Us years in prison, to run consecutively to the sentence upon the assault conviction. This Court thereafter reduced the assault conviction to assault in the third degree and remitted the matter for resentencing (97 AD3d 903 [2012]). County Court resentenced defendant to a jail term of one year and directed that it run consecutively to the federal sentence. Defendant now appeals.

The crux of defendant’s argument on appeal is that the definite sentence imposed upon the assault conviction should have merged with and been satisfied by the determinate sentence imposed upon the federal weapons charge (citing Penal Law *985§ 70.35). The record reflects, however, that defendant had been in custody for over one year at the time he was resentenced and, therefore, had served the resentence in full *(see*Penal Law § 70.30 [3]). Inasmuch as defendant fails to articulate what impact the resentence could now have upon his federal sentence or any other collateral legal issue, the present appeal is moot *(cf. People v*Amma, 95 AD3d 1561, 1562 [2012]). Finally, we are unpersuaded that this case falls within the exception to the mootness doctrine.

Stein, J.E, McCarthy, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot.
<PAGE>

                            Exhibit 32
                  Sarbannes-Oxley certification
                  -----------------------------


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO:
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alfa International
Holdings Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned certifies,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Alfa International Holdings Corp.




/s/Frank J. Drohan
------------------
Frank J. Drohan
Chief Executive & Financial Officer

Dated: November 18, 2005



The originally executed copy of this Certification will be
maintained at the Company's offices and will be made available
for inspection upon request.

                                 E-21
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51121 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOEL VALDEZ-ZUNIGA, also known as Joel Zuniga-Valez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-936-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Joel ValdezZuniga raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
F OR P UBLICATION



### UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT

M AR V I N V E R N I S S M I T H , Petitioner-Appellee , v. RA U L L O P E Z , W arden, R espondent-Appellant
. No. 12-55860 D.C. No. 8:11-cv-01076-ODW -MRW

ORDER
On Remand F rom The United States Supreme Court

F iled August 21, 2015 B efore: Sidney

R. Thomas, Chief J u dg e, Andrew D. Hurwitz , Circuit J udg e, and Ralph R. B eistline, * Chief

District J udg e.
ORDER I n a ccordance with the Opinion of the Supreme Court in Lopez v. Smith , 574 U.S. ___, 1 35 S. C t
. 1 (2014) (per curiam), the j u d g ment of the district c ourt g ranting Smith’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is REVERSED , and the matter is REMANDED for proce e d i ng s consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

* T h e H o n orab le Ra l p h R
. B eistlin e, Ch i ef District J u d g e f o r th e U .S. District Co u

rt f o r th e District o f

A lask a, sittin g b y

d esig n atio n .
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alexander G. Champe, Appellant.

Submitted August 9, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert C. Mitchell, Esq., Legal Aid Society of Suffolk County, Inc., Arthur M. Cromarty Court Complex, 300 Center Drive, PO Box 1697, Riverhead, New York 11901 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, David J. Mickelson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K/A of Redhook Ale Brewery,Incorporated;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report.Date: May 9, 2007         BY: /s/ David J. Mickelson            David J. Mickelson                 *President*
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION****1**     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne, M.D., the Chief Executive Officer andChairman of IDM Pharma, Inc. (the “Company”), and Robert De Vaere, the Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and**2.**The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report andresults of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.Dated: November 14, 2005     /s/ Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne   /s/ Robert De Vaere     Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne, M.D.
#### National Continental Insurance Company, Respondent, v Countrywide Insurance, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[976 NYS2d 67]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mitchell J. Danziger, J.), entered June 20, 2013, which granted plaintiff National Continental Insurance Company’s motion for a declaratory judgment that defendant Countrywide Insurance was obligated to provide primary coverage to defendant Disano Construction Co. in an underlying personal injury action commenced by defendant Mary Reyes, and denied Countrywide’s cross motion for summary judgment to declare that National was required to provide primary coverage for Disano Construction or, in the alternative, that the parties herein were coinsurers for the loss, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

On or about May 6, 2008, defendant Paulino Faustino was operating a 2004 Peterbilt tractor (the Peterbilt) owned by defendant Disano Trucking. Faustino was towing a 2001 Talbert trailer (the Talbert) owned by defendant Disano Construction. The Peterbilt was insured by plaintiff National, the Talbert by defendant Countrywide. National sought a declaration that its coverage was secondary, or excess, to the coverage of Countrywide, which was to be primary vis-a-vis any accident resulting in personal injury arising from the operation of the Peterbilt *417and the Talbert. The motion court correctly granted National the declaratory judgment it sought.

The policy language at issue is succinct, and “[a]n insurer is entitled to have its contract of insurance enforced in accordance with its provisions and without a construction contrary to its express terms” *(Broad St., LLC v Gulf Ins. Co.,*37 AD3d 126, 131 [1st Dept 2006]).

National’s policy provides primary coverage for a trailer if it is owned by the insured, Disano Construction, and both the tractor and trailer involved in the accident are listed on the policy’s declarations page. If not, coverage is excess. Neither of the two conditions for primary coverage was present here. The Countrywide policy, by contrast, provides primary coverage for the tractor and any trailer connected to it. Based on this clear language, Countrywide’s policy was primary, with National’s coverage to be excess.

Countrywide’s arguments to the contrary are unavailing *(see e.g. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co.,*100 AD2d 318 [3d Dept 1984], *affd*64 NY2d 840 [1985]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, DeGrasse, Richter and Clark, JJ.
**Cause No. DA 24**  **- 0204** 

__________________________________________________________________ IN THE SUPREME COUR T OF THE ST

AT E OF MONT

ANA

__________________________________________________________________ **MARK JOHNSON and MOLL Y**  **JOHNSON, Husband and Wife, individually an**  **d on behalf of all others similarly situated,**

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. **ST AT**  **E F ARM MUTUAL** 

**A UTOMOBILE INS. CO. and**  **ST AT**  **E F ARM FIRE**  **AND CASUAL TY**  **CO.,** Defendants and Appellees. On Ap peal from the Montana Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County

Cause No. DV

- 15 - 2019 - 934 -NE, Hon. Dan Wilson

__________________________________________________________________ **ORDER GRANTING APPELLANTS**  **’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR**  **EXTENSION OF TIME TO FI LE**  **APPELLANTS ’**  **REPL Y**  **BRIEF** Pursuant to Rule 26(1), M. R. App. P. , Plaintiffs/Appellants MARK JOHNSON and MOLL

Y JOHNSON, Husband and Wife, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, are granted a thirty - day extension of time through and up to W

ednesday , August 28, 2024, within which to file their reply brief. ELECTRONICALL Y SIGNED and DA

TED as indicated below. Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 23 2024

07/23/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0204
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

#             Search for Resources      

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

###### Resource Type

              - Brochures(15)
              - Factsheets(146)
              - Forms(26)
              - Infographics(19)
              - Instructions(133)
              - Maps(8)
              - Newsletters(16)
              - Official Documents & Guidelines(99)
              - Presentations(25)
              - Reports(111)
              - (-)Speeches(1)
              - Tools(29)
              - Transcripts(8)
              - Translation(15)
              - Videos(6)
              - Webinars(68)

###### Speeches

## National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and Association of Public and Land-grant Universities Memorial Lecture Series

            Each year the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) joins with the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU) to sponsor a lecture presented at the APLU Annual Meeting. The lecture honors one of the three most...
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                         695,639
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,358,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 21,933,895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            59,969,113
<PP&E>                                      95,572,984
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             167,871,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,899,277
<BONDS>                                     60,540,193
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,491,293
<OTHER-SE>                                  65,374,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               167,871,531
<SALES>                                    117,211,469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           117,211,469
<CGS>                                       90,709,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               90,709,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               118,457
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,333,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,697,972
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,814,786
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,883,186
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,883,186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2623 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2623

     To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-(1,3-Benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-
                       methylpropanal (Helional).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-(1,3-Benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-
                       methylpropanal (Helional).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-(1,3-BENZODIOXOL-5-YL)-2-METHYLPROPANAL (HELIONAL).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      3-(1,3-Benzodioxol- Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        5-yl)-2-                                                           31/2011.......
                        methylpropanal
                        (Helional) (CAS
                        No. 1205-17-0)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2932.99.70)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```