alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting. 

*Name:*                         LIGO Science Education Center Partnership (SUBR), Proposal Review Panel for Physics, #1208.                     

*Date and Time:*                         Thursday, February 19, 2009; 8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m.                     

Friday, February 20, 2009; 8 a.m.-4 p.m. 

*Place:*                         Southern University of Baton Rouge, Louisiana and LIGO Livingston, Louisiana.                     

*Type of Meeting:*                         Partially Closed.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Kathleen McCloud, Program Director, Division of Physic, National Science Foundation (703) 292-8236.                     

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide an evaluation concerning the proposal submitted to the National Science Foundation.                     

## Tentative Agenda 

### Thursday, February 19, 2009 

8:30 a.m.-11 a.m. Closed—Executive Session, Overview by LIGO-SUBR staff. 

11 a.m.-1:30 p.m. Open—tour of LIGO Education Center and Lunch. 

1:30 p.m.-2 p.m. Travel to SUBR. 

2:30 p.m.-5:30 p.m. Closed—Executive Session. 

### Friday, February 20, 2009 

8 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed—Executive Session. 

9 a.m.-10:30 a.m. Open—tour of SUBR facilities. 

11 a.m.-4 p.m. Closed—Executive Session with LIGO and SUBR, Close out. 

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposal contains proprietary or confidential material, including technical information on personnel. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2)(4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                     

Dated: February 3, 2009. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. E9-2532 Filed 2-5-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RONALD WALLACE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 75 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 3/31/00 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,560
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,417
<PP&E>                                          23,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,608
<BONDS>                                         49,408
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           102
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,427
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,027
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,492)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,492)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,492)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.54)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
 Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluations; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Stephen J. Hansbrough

Stephen J. HansbroughChairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### Bennie A. MACK, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William L. OSTEEN, Jr., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Federal District Court Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina; Karen L. Nensteil, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as a former agent for the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation; Robert M. Hamilton, in his individual and in his official capacity as an Assistant United States Attorney; Joseph M. Wilson, Jr., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as a practicing attorney and partner in the Law Firm of “Merritt Flebotte Wilson Webb *&*Carusso PLLC; Paul Trevor Sharp, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as a Federal Magistrate Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina; Judge Wallace W. Dixon, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as a Federal Magistrate Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina; Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as United States Attorney General; Anna Mills Wagoner, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina; Frank J. Chut, Jr., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Assistant United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina; Robin Pendergraft, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as Director of the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation; NC Attorney General Roy Cooper, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as North Carolina Attorney General; Kevin Snead, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as an agent for the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 09-6218.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 23, 2009.

Decided: May 5, 2009.

Bennie A. Mack, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, Gill Paul Beck, Sr., Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bennie A. Mack, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *Mack v. Osteen,*No. 1:08-cv-00776-NCT-RAE (M.D.N.C. Jan. *17030, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### Jackson, *ex dem.*Beekman, *against*Stephens.

ti’^lieheretoforé ^b^'caiieinn tnffmnhwes® the *Kayadcros*that adopted by ers, for the ditent, ¡n *mo*an *a Baker's*falls, are the «third f””jt¡0¡¡ievdel',"¡1¡

”„bm?tted Jtbe presumed’11 to® bandoDed,en and rTMg°omdmadf new trial,

THIS was an action of ejectment, brought to recover part of lot No. 4., in lot No. 1., in lot No. 13., in the 25th allotment of the patent of *Kayaderosseras.*The cause was tried at the *Saratoga*circuit, in *May,*1815. •

The principal question in this case was, whether the commissioners who, in 1770, run the boundaries of the *Kayaderosseras*patent, had taken the true northwesternmost head of the *Kayaderosseras*creek, and had run the line described in the patent * as follows, correctly: “ thence northerly, to the northwestern-most head of a creek called *Kayaderosseras,*about fourteen miles, more or less; thence eight miles northerly, thence easter3y to the third falls in *Albany*river, about twenty miles, more or_ less.’’ If the location made by the commissioners was correct, the plaintiff was entitled to recover the premises in question, to which he deduced a regular title under the *Kayaderosseras*patent. A variety of evidence was given on the trial, to support and impugn that location, and to show an adverse possession in the defendant, which, however, it is unnecessary to state. A verdict was taken for the plaintiff, and the defendant moved to have it set aside, and a new trial granted.

*Skinner,*for the defendant.

*J.Emott,*contra.

*Per Curiam.*

The construction to be given to the Kayade» *rosseras patent*has been too long and well settled, to be again called in question. The cases of *Jackson*v. *Lindsey, (3 Johns. Cas.*86.,) and *Jackson*v. *Ogden,*(1 *Johns. Rep.*156.,) show, that the place adopted by the commissioners is to be deemed the *northwesternmost head of the Kayaderosseras ;*and that the course from thence, *eight miles more northerly,*must be a due north course. It is admitted that the *third falls,*mentioned in the patent, are those called *Baker's*falls; and, running the line according to these objects, will, confessedly, include the premises in question within the patent. The lessor of the plaintiif, hav*496
      *íñg*deduced a regular title to himself, be is entitled to recover, .unless the defendant is .protected by his- length of possession. On this .point there might have been some reason to doubt, had it been made a question upon the trial. Whether there had , . 1 - 1 been a twenty years’1 ¡adversé possession, or not, was- matter pro.per for the .determination, of. the jury; -and the ease furnishes pretty strong- evidence on.this .point,, at.leas't up, tq.‘what,is call.ed the middle line.. But as the question does ;n,ot appear-. to have been at all submitted tó the 'jury,, we.must; presume .-it was1 abandoned upon the trial, and the motiqn for a new trial must be.denied, ■ , . • . . ■ ■ ; . V:.

Motion denied,.
Bell B206L, B407, & B429 

Audio Requirements for USFS Cooperators 

TX - Radio Transmit Capability 

RX - Radio Receive Capability 

ICS - Intercom Capability 

RX 

ICS 

RX 

ICS 

April 2, 2024 
Bell B206L & B407 

Audio Requirements for USFS Contracted 

Helicopters Approved for Passengers 

A or B TX - Either Right Door PAX Seat 

/1 arnrrm

-�- �frn;ll1liJ

�UliJ

B 

RX 

ICS 

RX 

ICS 

D 

RX 

ICS 

C or D TX - Either Left Door PAX Seat 

TX - Radio Transmit Capability 

RX - Radio Receive Capability 

ICS - Intercom Capability 
Bell B429 

Audio Requirements for USFS Contracted 

Helicopters Approved for Passengers

TX - Radio Transmit Capability 

RX - Radio Receive Capability 

ICS - Intercom Capability 

RX

ICS 

TX

RX

ICS 

TX

RX

ICS ICS 

RX

RX

ICS
Bell B206L, B407, & B429

Audio Requirements for USFS Helicopters

Contracted for Rotor Wing Aerial Supervision

TX 

RX 

ICS 

RX 

ICS 

TX 

RX 

ICS 

The aft audio control shall be ceiling mounted 

and face the center forward facing PAX seat 

TX - Radio Transmit Capability 

RX - Radio Receive Capability 

ICS - Intercom Capability
S-258 Communications Technician

March 25th thru 29th 

ROSTER
#### Magnolia Mfg. of N.C., Inc. v. Erie Ins. Exch.

Case below: 361 N.C. 213

No. 525A06-2

Plt/Appellee/Petitioner’s Petition for Rehearing

Denied 03/08/07

Parker, C.J., Timmons-Goodson, J., and Hudson, J., Récused
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2549 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2549

       To suspend temporarily the duty on Mixtures of 1-[[bis(4-
  fluorophenyl)methylsilyl]methyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazole with xylene and 
                      inert application adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

  Mr. Burris introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on Mixtures of 1-[[bis(4-
  fluorophenyl)methylsilyl]methyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazole with xylene and 
                      inert application adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF 1-[[BIS(4-FLUOROPHENYL)METHYLSILYL]METHYL]-1H-
              1,2,4-TRIAZOLE WITH XYLENE AND INERT APPLICATION 
              ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Mixtures of 1-      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        [[bis(4-                                                           31/2011.......
                        fluorophenyl)meth
                        ylsilyl]methyl]-
                        1H-1,2,4-triazole
                        (Flusilazole)
                        (CAS No. 85509-19-
                        9) with xylene
                        and inert
                        application
                        adjuvants
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3808.92.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101 (Thursday, May 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12589]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  11 a.m., Friday, June 26, 2009.

PLACE:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Surveillance Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-12589 Filed 5-26-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2647 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2647

   To suspend temporarily the duty on lithium ion electrical storage 
                                battery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on lithium ion electrical storage 
                                battery.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LITHIUM ION ELECTRICAL STORAGE BATTERY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Lithium ion         2.4%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        electric storage                                                   31/2011.......
                        batteries,
                        certified by the
                        importer for use
                        in hybrid
                        electric motor
                        vehicles
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8507.80.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

IAN PISARCHUK,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 10 MAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

IAN PISARCHUK,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 11 MAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of May, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2679 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4′-methylenebis(2-chloroaniline). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4,4′-methylenebis(2- 

chloroaniline). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4,4′-METHYLENEBIS(2-CHLOROANILINE). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4,4′-methylenebis(2- 

chloroaniline) (CAS No. 101– 

14–4) (provided for in subheading 2921.59.08) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2679 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### Anil Bachan, Appellant, v NYC Partnership Housing Development Fund Company, Inc., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[975 NYS2d 907]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), entered January 17, 2012, which, upon an order of the same court dated November 29, 2011, in effect, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, is in favor of the defendant and against him dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

At approximately 6:30 p.m. on June 27, 2005, the plaintiff, an employee of the third-party defendant, Delight Construction Company, allegedly was injured when he slipped and fell while descending an interior, permanently affixed ladder connecting the third floor and the roof of the defendant’s premises. The plaintiff alleged that the hatch which led to the roof of the subject building had been left open and, since it had rained *572earlier that day, the rain had fallen into the building, making the ladder slippery.

The defendant established, prima facie, that it did not create or have actual or constructive notice of the allegedly wet condition which caused the plaintiff to fall *(see Pungello v Window Network, LLC,*102 AD3d 850 [2013]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836, 837-838 [1986]).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly, in effect, granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and, thus, the judgment dismissing the complaint must be affirmed. Dillon, J.E, Angiolillo, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.