alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1)       | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | (2)  | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |

|         |                                                                                                         |                                     |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|         |                                                                                                         |
|    |                                                                                                    |                                |
|         | By:                                                                                                | /s/ Fred                  Wilkinson |
|         | Fred                    WilkinsonChief                    Executive OfficerAugust                    2, 2005 |

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Grants 
-  Programs 
-  4-H and Positive Youth Development 
-  4-H Professional and Volunteer Development 

# Young Adults

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

              -  4-H and Positive Youth Development                   -  4-H Team 
                -  4-H National Headquarters 
                -  National 4-H Conference 
                -  Communities Support Military Families Curriculum 
                -  4-H Program Quality And Accountability                    -  4-H Name And Emblem 
                -  4-H Access, Equity And Opportunity                    -  Children, Youth And Families At Risk (CYFAR) 
                  -  CYFAR Grant Application Resources And Information 
                  -  CYFAR Grantee Resources 
                  -  Vulnerable Populations 
                  -  Military Youth Programs 
                -  4-H Learning                    -  4-H Civic Engagement 
                  -  4-H Health And Well-Being 
                  -  4-H Science 
                -  4-H Professional And Volunteer Development                    -  Young Adults 
                -  4-H And PYD Partnerships                    -  Formal PYD Partnerships 
                  -  Informal PYD Partnerships 
                  -  PYD Inter-Agency Working Groups/White House Initiatives 

While the majority of 4-H youth development work is conducted with youth at the school age level, the 4-H program also provides an opportunity for young adults.

The 4-H Youth Development Program is the youth outreach program from the land-grant institutions’ cooperative extension services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. 4-H serves as a model program for the practice of positive youth development by creating positive learning experiences; positive relationships for and between youth and adults; positive, safe environments; and opportunities for positive risk taking. Involvement for young adults in positive youth development programming can take many forms. The below resources outline some of these opportunities.

  

4-H Headquarters

4-H Opportunties for Young Adults 

Collegiate 4-H Program 

Federal Internships and Early Career Opportunities 

Engaging Young Adults

Youth
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

 

I, Kenneth R. Posner, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer, in connection with the Report on Form 10-Q ofAngelo and Maxie’s, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2003,hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)                   The accompanying Report of Angeloand Maxie’s, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 29,2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934  and

2)                   The information contained in suchReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Angelo and Maxie’s, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/ KENNETH  R. POSNER                 |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Kenneth R.  Posner                     |
|   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Dated:  November 13, 2003         |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toAngelo and Maxie’s, Inc. and will be retained by Angelo and Maxie’s, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
{"Online":false,"BadgeEnabled":false}
No. 834.

#### Dow *v.*Ickes, Secretary of the Interior, et al.

March 30, 1942.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1307 

KA 12-00295 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PEDRO RAMOS-ROMAN, ALSO KNOWN AS EDGAR, 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (NICHOLAS P. DIFONZO OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ASHLEY R. SMALL OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M.

William Boller, A.J.), rendered July 21, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law

§ 125.20 [1]). We agree with defendant that the oral and written

waivers of his right to appeal from his conviction of that crime do

not encompass his challenge to the severity of his sentence and thus

do not foreclose our review of that challenge (see People v Maracle,

19 NY3d 925, 927-928). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is

not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: December 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 200 (Monday, October 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25195]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, October 22, 2009.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Request from U.S. <greek-i>1364 Federal Credit Union to Convert 
to a Community Charter.
    2. Request from Kansas State Supervisory Authority for an Exemption 
from Section 712.3(d)(3) of NCUA's Rules and Regulations.
    3. Final Rule--Part 745 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Share 
Insurance and Appendix.
    4. Insurance Fund Report.

RECESS: 11:15 a.m.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Thursday, October 22, 2009.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Consideration of Supervisory Activities (5). Closed pursuant to 
some or all of the following exemptions: (8), (9)(A)(ii) and 9(B).
    2. Personnel. Closed pursuant to exemptions (2) and (6).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-25195 Filed 10-15-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2527 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain men’s 

footwear, valued over $23/pair, covering the ankle, whose height from 

the bottom of the outer sole to the top of the upper does not exceed 

8 inches, with a coated or laminated textile fabric. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Ms. CANTWELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty 

on certain men’s footwear, valued over $23/pair, covering 

the ankle, whose height from the bottom of the outer 

sole to the top of the upper does not exceed 8 inches, 

with a coated or laminated textile fabric. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2527 IS

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN’S FOOTWEAR, VALUED OVER $23/ 

2 PAIR, COVERING THE ANKLE, WHOSE HEIGHT 

3 FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE OUTER SOLE TO 

4 THE TOP OF THE UPPER DOES NOT EXCEED 

5 8 INCHES, WITH A COATED OR LAMINATED 

6 TEXTILE FABRIC. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.60 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

9 certain men’s footwear, valued over $23/pair, covering the 

10 ankle, whose height from the bottom of the outer sole to 

11 the top of the upper does not exceed 8 inches, with a coat12 ed or laminated textile fabric) is amended— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘$20/pair’’ and inserting ‘‘$23/ 

14 pair’’; and 

15 (2) by striking the date in the effective column 

16 period and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

19 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

20 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CERRITOS
VALLEY BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      31,440,745
<SECURITIES>                                40,445,616
<RECEIVABLES>                               62,990,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,179,330
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,769,847
<PP&E>                                       4,262,371
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,494,757
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             141,235,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      131,377,286
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,158,869
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,706,897
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               141,235,052
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,281,972
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,308,375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,705,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               130,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,137,660
<INCOME-TAX>                                   874,904
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,262,756
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,262,756
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.19


</TABLE>
#### Joel Murray, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

Submitted December 13, 2010;

decided February 22, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Grants 
-  Funding Opportunities 

# Open Data Framework

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

The Open Data Framework program will build a framework needed to create a neutral and secure data repository and cooperative where producers, universities and nonprofit entities can store and share data in ways that will foster agricultural innovation and will support technological progress, production efficiencies, and environmental stewardship. 

A recording of the technical assistance webinar related to this FY 2023 funding opportunity is available via the button below. Supporting documents will also be posted to this page after the event.

**Reasonable Accommodations and Language Access Services: **If you need a reasonable accommodation to participate in any of the informational webinars listed, please contact the event host listed no later than 10 days prior to the event. NIFA offers language access services, such as interpretation and translation of vital information, free of charge. If you need interpretation or translation services, please visit NIFA Language Access Services or contact Lois Tuttle, Equal Opportunity Specialist, at Lois.Tuttle@usda.gov  or (443) 386-9488.

Apply For GrantDownload RFATechnical Assistance Webinar

NIFA Language Access Services

Applications may only be submitted by entities such as State agricultural experiment stations; colleges and universities; university research foundations; other research institutions and organizations; Federal agencies; national laboratories; private organizations, foundations, or corporations; individuals; or any group consisting of two or more of the above entities.

Thursday, April 6, 2023

Ann E. Stapleton

Monday, May 8, 2023

grantapplicationquestions@usda.gov

FY22-ODF-RFA-508-F.pdf(pdf - 432.16 KB)
China Biologic Products, Inc.: Exhibit 10.18 - Prepared by TNT Filings
Inc.




       




Exhibit 10.18 


Loan Agreement


(Translated Version) 

Party A: Shandong Institute of Biological Products 

Party B: Shandong Taibang Biological Products Co., Ltd. Party
C: Logic Express Ltd. 

Due to various acquisition activities of plasma stations in
2006 of Party B, Party B and Party has reached the following terms for the
purpose of meeting Party A working capital requirement. 

1.    
Party A is willing to lend to Party B in the amount RMB5,271,146.07 deriving
from the dividend payment of Party B. 

2.    
Period: Loan period is from September 1, 2006 to August 31, 2007. If Party A
receives the transformation document in an earlier date, Party A shall notify
Party B the actual repayment date 15 days in advance. 

3.    
Interest: 6% p.a. payable on a monthly basis i.e. RMB26,350 per month. Interest
for September to November 2006 in the amount of RMB51,105, net of RBM14,000
already paid, shall be settled in November 2006. From December 2006 onward,
monthly interest of RMB26,350 shall be paid in due course. 

4.    
Guarantee: Party C guarantees Party A for Party B using its shares in Party B as
collateral. 

5.    
Legal responsibility: If Party B does not pay the interest on time, Party B has
the right to request Party B to repay the loan principal before maturity date.
If Party B does not repay the principal and interest within the requested
period, Part B shall charge 0.05% per day penalty accruing from the end of the
requested period. If Party B still does not pay the full amount of the penalty,
Party C shall transfer its shares in Party B according the corresponding amount
of shares to Party A. Party A shall be entitled the right of the corresponding
amount of shares immediately. 

6.    
Others: Any dispute arising from this Agreement shall be negotiated by all
Parties. If all Parties cannot reach an agreement, it shall be settled with the
Taian City Arbitration Committee. 

7.    
Each Party shall retain one copy of this Agreement. 

Page 1 of 2 



	
               

	
              Signed and sealed by:

	
               

	
               

	
               

	
              Shandong Institute of Biological Products

	
               

	
              Shandong Taibang Biological Products Co., Ltd

	
               

	
              Logic Express Ltd

	
               

	
              Date: November 30, 2006




 

 

 

 


Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT 21

                LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF FULL HOUSE RESORTS, INC.

   NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                            JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
   ------------------                            -----------------------------

Deadwood Gulch Resort and
   Gaming Corp.                                          South Dakota

Full House Mississippi, LLC                               Mississippi

Full House Subsidiary, Inc.                                Delaware

Full House Subsidiary of
   Nevada, Inc.                                             Nevada

AEP/FHR, LLC*                                               Nevada

FH/HR Management, LLC*                                    Mississippi

Gaming Entertainment, LLC*                                 Delaware

Gaming Entertainment
   (Delaware), LLC*                                        Delaware

Gaming Entertainment
   (Michigan), LLC*                                        Delaware

Gaming Entertainment
   (California), LLC*                                      Delaware

Greenhouse Management, Inc.**                              Michigan

    *50% owned
  **85% owned
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public accounting firm

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-71812 and 33-86980 of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-8 of
our report dated April 19, 2004 (April 25, 2005 as to the effects of the
restatement discussed in Note 11), (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption of new
accounting principles as described in Note 1 and the restatement described in
Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements), incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2004, and of
our report on the financial statement schedule, dated April 19, 2004, appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2004.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Birmingham, Alabama

April 28, 2005
#### Urner *v.*Kayton and others.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

August 2, 1883.)

Patents—Infringement—Master’s Pees—Accounting.

Where defendants have been adjudged to be infringers, and decreed to account for the gains and profits and damages of their infringement, they must go forward in the accounting and bear the necessary expenses of so doing, including the master’s fee.

In Equity.

*John A. Shields,*master, *pro se.*

*Andrew Comstock,*for orator.

*Wet more é Jenner,*for defendants.

Wheeler, J.

This cause has now been heard on motion of the master for payment of his fees on the accounting. It is agreed that his fees amount to $150. Each party insists that the other should pay them. The question now is, not how the costs shall finally he allowed and taxed in favor of either party against the other, which can he determined properly only at the making of the final decree, hut is, which party shall pay these fees in the first instance ? As the defend*540ants have been adjudged to be infringers, and decreed *to*account for the gains, profits, and damages of their infringemeht, they are to go forward in the accounting and bear the necessary expenses of doing so, among which are the master’s fees. This was so held in *Bridges*v. *Sheldon,*Dist. Vt. Oct. Term, 1879.

Let an order be entered that the defendants pay these fees within, 15.days from the entry of the order.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Kirkwood Donnell CABINESS, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-7546.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 2009.

Decided: May 26, 2009.

Kirkwood Donnell Cabiness, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kirkwood Donnell Cabiness appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and its subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Cabiness,*No. 4:02-cr-70031-1, 2008 WL 2906942 (W.D.Va. July 28, 2008; Aug. 8, 2008). *227
      *See United States v. Dunphy,*551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Jin Mei Liu et al., Appellants, v Yolanda Lamberta, Respondent.

[870 NYS2d 795]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), entered October 25, 2007, which, upon an order of the same court dated August 23, 2007, granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Jin Mei Liu did not sustain a serious injuiy within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), dismissed the complaint.

*688Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant met her prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff Jin Mei Liu did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Skelos, J.E, Dillon, Garni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.