alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fred Wilkinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    FRED WILKINSONFred Wilkinson Chief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         631,456
<SECURITIES>                                   513,788
<RECEIVABLES>                                  799,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,400
<INVENTORY>                                  1,830,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,936,249
<PP&E>                                         657,637
<DEPRECIATION>                                 355,877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,337,783
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,811,831
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,349
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,337,783
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,405,548
<CGS>                                        6,327,871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,675,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,362,115)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,362,115)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.75)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 97 (Thursday, May 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11884]



[[Page 23900]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11742 and <greek-i>11743]


Mississippi Disaster <greek-i>MS-00029

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Mississippi dated 05/14/2009.
    Incident: Severe storms and flooding.
    Incident Period: 05/06/2009 through 05/08/2009.
    Effective Date: 05/14/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/13/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/15/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Panola.
Contiguous Counties:
    Mississippi: Lafayette, Quitman, Tallahatchie, Tate, Tunica, 
Yalobusha.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      4.875
Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere................      2.437
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere...................      6.000
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit             4.500
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11742 B 
and for economic injury is 11743 0.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> is 
Mississippi.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: May 14, 2009.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-11884 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Martek Biosciences
Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the
date hereof:



| | a) |  | the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
October 31, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                                                                                                                                    

/s/ Peter L. BuzyPeter L. Buzy
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Martek Biosciences
Corporation and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Randall L. Herrel, Sr., in my capacity as Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Ashworth, Inc. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Quarterly Report of the Registrant, on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended April 30, 2003 to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



Dated: June 13, 2003                    /s/ Randall L. Herrel, Sr.
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Randall L. Herrel, Sr.,
                                        Chairman, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PHILIP A. BRALICH

, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 20

- 3248 (UNA)

)

FOX NEWS NETWORK, LLC, et al.

, )

)

Defendant s

. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis

, his pro se civil complaint and motion for appointment of counsel.

Generally, the plaintiff laments the “hate speech” and derogatory language used by the

current President of the United States, national political parties, and media outlets when speaking

of the indigent, the disabled, and other members of this society who may not be belong to a

“recognized” minority group , since the administration of former Presiden t Ronald Reagan

. The

p laintiff considers himself a target of such speech

. He demands an award of $24 million and

injunctive relief.

The Court has reviewed the plaintiff’s complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed

by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings

drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must

co mply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch , 656 F. Supp. 237, 239

(D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint

contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s j urisdiction depends, a

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demandfor judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum

standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to

prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the

doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano

, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

This comp laint fails to meet the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a). Its

factual allegations are so broad and so vague that the pleading does not give the named

defendants fair notice of the claims asserted against them. An Order consistent with thi s

Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE: November 19, 2020 /s/

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON

United States District Judge
CASEY TATE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2732

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 24, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Dawn Caloca

- Johnson , Judge

.

Jeffrey E. Lewis, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Michael J. Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO

, CLARK

, and MARSTILLER

, J J

. , CONCUR.
NOTE: This orderis nonprecedential. 

# mniteb $>tates <!Courtof**~pea(s** 

# for tbe jf 

# ebera( <!Cirruit

SCOTT TIMBER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, 

### v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.
2011-5092 Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims incase no. 05-CV-708, Judge Charles F. Lettow. ONMOTION

ORDER The United States moves for a 62-day extension of time, until October 3, 2011, to file its principal brief. Scott Timber Company opposes. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. No further extensions should be anticipated.SCOTT TIMBER COMPANY v. US 

## JUL 292011 Date

cc: Alan 1. Saltman, Esq. EllenM. Lynch, Esq. 

### s21 FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2



### FILED U.s. COURTOFAPPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

### JUL 292011

JAN

### HORBAlV CLERK
#### Jayson Brent DICKINSON; Robert Leslie Caldwell; Don Edward Jones, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. TX, FORT BEND COUNTY; Fort Bend County Jail; Milton Wright, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-20409

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 20, 2009.

Jayson Brent Dickinson, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Robert Leslie Caldwell, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Don Edward Jones, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

*390Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jayson Brent Dickinson, Texas prisoner # 1491494, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Dickinson argues that being denied access to a law library violated his constitutional rights and that having appointed counsel did not provide him with adequate access to the law. He argues that he was misrepresented by counsel and that without access to a law library, he could not prevent this misrepresentation. He argues that he had a right to investigate the law on his own behalf while he had charges pending against him.

We review the dismissal de novo. *See Ruiz v. United States,*160 F.3d 273, 275 (5th Cir.1998). “[T]he fundamental constitutional right of access to the courts requires prison authorities to assist inrriates in the preparation and filing of meaningful legal papers by providing prisoners with adequate law libraries or adequate assistance from persons trained in the law.” *Bounds v. Smith,*430 U.S. 817, 828, 97 S.Ct. 1491, 52 L.Ed.2d 72 (1977) (emphasis added). Because Dickinson had court-appointed counsel to represent him, he did not have a constitutional right of access to a law library to prepare his criminal defense. *See Degrate v. Godwin,*84 F.3d 768, 769 (5th Cir.1996). Accordingly, the district court did not err in dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim.

Dickinson’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous and the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim each count as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). *See Ade-pegba v. Hammons,*103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir.1996). We caution Dickinson that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*§ 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Howard W. Robin, Chief Executive Officer of Sirna Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company), and I, Patti Ketchner, Vice President and Corporate
Controller of the Company, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows:



|1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 18th day of March, 2004.



/s/ Howard W. RobinHoward W. Robin President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




/s/ Patti KetchnerPatti Ketchner Vice President and Corporate Controller (Acting Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE:

SLADE ALAN MOORE

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00066-CR

Appeal from the

County Court

of Andrews County, Texas

(TC# 19-0258)

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REHEARING

The opinion and judgment issued on April 9, 2020 are hereby withdrawn. The following is 

the opinion of this Court.

Slade Alan Moore has moved for reconsideration of this Court's decision to dismiss this 

appeal for want of jurisdiction. We will grant the motion and reinstate the appeal.

The Court initially dismissed this case because it appeared Appellant was attempting to 

appeal from an order denying a motion to quash an indictment, which is not an appealable 

interlocutory order. See Webb v. State, Nos. 10-12-00365-CR, 10-12-00366-CR, 2012 WL 

5697585, at *1 (Tex.App.—Waco Nov. 15, 2012, no pet.). However, on rehearing, Appellant 

clarified that he sought to appeal the denial of his pre-trial application for writ of habeas corpus 

challenging the constitutionality of a statute. The denial of a pretrial habeas corpus writ application 
2

is a final appealable order. See Ex parte Hinojos, No. 08-17-00077-CR, 2018 WL 6629678, at *1 

(Tex.App.—El Paso Dec. 19, 2018, pet. ref’d)(not designated for publication)(noting that pretrial 

habeas corpus proceedings are separate criminal actions allowing the applicant the right to an 

immediate appeal before trial begins); see also Greenwell v. Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth 

Dist., 159 S.W.3d 645, 650 (Tex. 2005)(claims raised in a pretrial habeas application may be 

immediately reviewed in a direct pretrial appeal, even where the same claims could not be 

reviewed pretrial absent explicit statutory authorization if those claims had been raised simply by 

pretrial motion).

Therefore, we grant Appellant’s motion to reconsider and reinstate this appeal. We hereby 

order the appellate timelines in this case to be reestablished. The reporter’s record is due thirty

days from the date of this opinion.

April 30, 2020

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
#### State v. Holmes

Case below: 177 N.C. App. 565

No. 283P06

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA05-986)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 360 N.C. 540

2. Allowed 12/19/06

3. Allowed 12/19/06
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 103 (Monday, June 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12633]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1013 (Review)]


Saccharin From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on 
saccharin from China would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on June 2, 2008 (73 FR 31504) 
and determined on September 5, 2008 that it would conduct a full review 
(73 FR 53444, September 16, 2008). Notice of the scheduling of the 
Commission's review and of a public hearing to be held in connection 
therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of 
the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and 
by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on December 1, 2008 
(73 FR 72837). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on March 26, 
2009, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to 
appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the 
Secretary of Commerce on May 21, 2009. The views of the Commission are 
contained in USITC Publication 4077 (May 2009), entitled Saccharin From 
China: Investigation No. 731-TA-1013 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 27, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-12633 Filed 5-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-09-P