alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1999
<CASH>                                             365
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,992
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,655
<PP&E>                                         114,591
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,958
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,608
<SALES>                                         36,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,040
<CGS>                                           11,416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,905
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    577
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                577
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       577
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 4I

               AMENDMENT TO INVESTORS' RIGHTS AGREEMENT

     Section 1.2(b) of the Investors' Rights Agreement, dated
April 26, 2002, by and among CONCEPTS DIRECT, INC., a Delaware
corporation, ST. CLOUD CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP, a Delaware limited
partnership, PHILLIP A. WILAND, an individual, and LINDA S.
WILAND, an individual, is hereby amended to read as follows:

     (b)  Mandatory Registration.  In addition to the foregoing,
     the Company shall prepare and file with the SEC prior to
     February 15, 2003, a Registration Statement or Registration
     Statements (as necessary) covering all of the Holder's
     Registrable Securities.  The Company shall cause such
     Registration Statement to be declared effective by the SEC by
     May 15, 2003.

The parties have executed this Amendment to Investors' Rights
Agreement as of January 3, 2003.

                                 CONCEPTS DIRECT, INC.


                                 By:  /s/ Zaid H. Haddad
                                 Name:  Zaid H. Haddad
                                 Title:  Chief Financial Officer

                                 ST. CLOUD CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP


                                 By:  /s/ Cary S. Fitchey
                                 Name:  Cary S. Fitchey
                                 Title:  Senior Managing Director

                                 PHILLIP A. WILAND


                                 By: /s/ Phillip A. Wiland
                                 Phillip A. Wiland

                                 LINDA S. WILAND


                                 By: /s/ Linda S. Wiland
                                 Linda S. Wiland
#### Marc S. Kirschner, as Trustee of the Refco Litigation Trust, Appellant, v KPMG LLP et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Submitted August 2, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

Motion by Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association for leave to appear amicus curiae on consideration of the certified questions herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
#### Gilbert Lau, Appellant, v S&M Enterprises et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 3, 2011;

decided February 17, 2011

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellant’s motion for disqualification of respondents’ counsel, dismissed upon the ground that such part of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Events 
-  Multimedia Library 

# Hearing Protection: How to Use Formable Earplugs

Share this on: 

This video demonstrates the correct way to use formable earplugs to help prevent noise-induced hearing loss. Also available: Hearing Protection: How to Use Pre-Molded Earplugs.

## Embed this multimedia on your website

Copy and paste this code to embed the content in your website, blog, or other distribution channels. Information on our website is in the public domain, but we appreciate when you link to the source and when credit is given to the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2eBpSctTXkY" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe><p>This video demonstrates the correct way to use formable earplugs to help prevent noise-induced hearing loss. Also available: <a href="https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/news/multimedia/hearing-protection-how-use-pre-molded-earplugs-video" data-cke-saved-href="/news/multimedia/hearing-protection-how-use-pre-molded-earplugs-video">Hearing Protection: How to Use Pre-Molded Earplugs</a>.</p>

 

May 9, 2022

## Language

          - English
          - Español

## Media Inquiries

Contact the NIDCD press office at news@nidcd.nih.gov.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Weinberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 
 
 
 /s/ David L. Weinberg
David L. Weinberg
Chief Financial Officer
November 3, 2004


---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12478]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Federal Open Market Committee; Domestic Policy Directive of April 
28 and 29, 2009

    In accordance with Sec.  271.25 of its rules regarding availability 
of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic 
policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its 
meeting held on April 28 and 29, 2009.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\[thinsp]Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market 
Committee at its meeting held on April 28 and 29, 2009, which 
includes the domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are 
available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal 
Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551. The minutes are published in 
the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's annual report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial 
conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable 
growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee 
seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds 
trading in a range of 0 to \1/4\ percent. The Committee directs the 
Desk to purchase GSE debt GSE-guaranteed MBS, and longer-term Treasury 
securities during the intermeeting period with the aim of providing 
support to private credit markets and economic activity. The timing and 
pace of these purchases should depend on conditions in the markets for 
such securities and on a broader assessment of private credit market 
conditions. The Committee anticipates that the combination of outright 
purchases and various liquidity facilities outstanding will cause the 
size of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet to expand significantly in 
coming months. The Desk is expected to purchase up to $200 billion in 
housing-related GSE debt by the end of this year. The Desk is expected 
to purchase at least $500 billion in GSE-guaranteed MBS by the end of 
the second quarter of this year and is expected to purchase up to $1.25 
trillion of these securities by the end of this year. The Committee 
also directs the Desk to purchase longer-term Treasury securities 
during the intermeeting period. Over the next six months, the Desk is 
expected to purchase up to $300 billion of longer-term Treasury 
securities. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary 
will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the 
System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of 
the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.
    By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, May 21, 2009.

Brian F. Madigan,
Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-12478 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
TO RELM (KING) U-94A/U
RADIO CONNECTOR
nc [4 am r al 2
ore PTT |2 | —e1ow oat 0 |
OH Sigteer GROUND | 3p oe | |
case. MIC HIGH | 4 aa) i+ |
NIC |5| | —exsrive t |
©e nic |6 i | 1-MIC HIGH
AUDIO HIGH ue \ | 2-AUDIO HIGH
AUDIO LOW | | 3-MICLOW
P-4 \ | 4-AUDIO LOW
xl
em AS PARTS SOURCES
P-2: U-94A/U CONNECTOR W/PTT ene poplars (ONG) vi aot
R-1: 2000 OHM, 1/8 WATT RESISTOR
LENGTH OF ADAPTER CABLE NO LESS THAN 15 INCHES. airs nae meee
PRE-BUILT ADAPTER CABLES AVAILABLE FROM: NIFC
(NFES 5328) OR AIR COMM (ACS 988-3). AIR COMM SYSTEMS (909) 824-8860
Revtio] Revision note Date ritials [Checked] I National Interagency Fire Center (FC) ‘Avionics (208) 387-5643
a Ea er Ee Eo
U.S.D.A RELM EPH HEADSET ADAPTER
FOREST SERVICE NIICDA-2 [°°] i
T T

2 aes SEE LS Fa SR RY OR CG Na | 6 T a
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Clarence G. Simmons, III, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Clarence G. Simmons, III                               
|Clarence G. Simmons, III                                   
|Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|February 28, 2007
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2566 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,10-diaminodecane. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. ALEXANDER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,10- 

diaminodecane. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,10-DIAMINODECANE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.02 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 1,10-diaminodecane) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2566 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2492 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2492

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain sector 
                          mold press machines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain sector 
                          mold press machines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SECTOR MOLD PRESS MACHINES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.84.89 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain sector mold press 
machines) is amended--
            (1) by striking the article description and inserting the 
        following: ``Sector mold press machines, numerically 
        controlled, the foregoing to be used in production of radial 
        tires designed for off-the-highway use with a rim measuring 
        63.5 cm or more in diameter (provided for in subheading 
        4011.20.10, 4011.61.00, 4011.63.00, 4011.69.00, 4011.92.00, 
        4011.94.40, or 4011.99.45), and parts thereof (provided for in 
        subheading 8477.51.00 or 8477.90.85)''; and
            (2) by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/
        2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Howard Thomson, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Terrace Ventures Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       



| | By:    |                            
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        | /s/
      Howard Thomson   
| | Name:  | HOWARD THOMSON             
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | September 14, 2009         





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Linda S. Restrepo and Carlos E. Restrepo,

d/b/a Collectively RDI Global Services and

R & D International

,

Appellant s

,

v.

Alliance Riggers & Constructors, Ltd.

,

Appellee

. '

'

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 183

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2012DCV04523 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is a motion filed by Appellee, Alliance Riggers & Constructors,

Ltd., to lift the stay order or grant a protective order. On July 17, 2013, the Court granted

Appellants’ motion for a stay and ordered that the trial court stay all proceedings in the case below.

Alliance Riggers asserts in its motion that Appellants have continued to engage in discovery

following the entry of the stay order. Appellants state in their respon se that they intended to

request a stay of only the commencement of a trial pursuant to Section 51.014(b) of the Texas Civil

Practice and Remedies Code. Section 51.014 provides that an interlocutory appeal o f an order

granting or deny ing a special appearance stays the commencement of a trial pending resolution of

the appeal. See T EX .C IV .P RAC

. & R EM .C ODE A NN

. §51.014(a)(7), (b)(West Supp. 2012). An

appeal of such an order does not result in an automatic stay of all proceedings in the case.

T EX .C IV .P RAC

. & R EM .C ODE A NN

. §51.014(b).

1Given the parties’ objections to a stay of all proceedings in the case below, t he Court finds

it necessary to modify the stay previously entered in this case. We therefore GRANT Alliance

Riggers ’ motion i n part and lift the stay insofar as it stayed all proceedings in the case below.

Pursuant to Section 51.014(b), it is ORDERED that the commencement of any trial in the case

below is stayed pending resolution of this appeal. T EX .C IV .P RAC

. & R EM .C ODE A NN

. §51.014(b).

The Court DENIES Alliance Riggers’ motion for a protective order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 7 th day of September

, 201 3

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Rivera, not participating)

2
#### In the Matter of Anita Salmela, Respondent, v Michael Goodwin, Appellant. (Proceeding Nos. 1 and 2.) In the Matter of Michael Goodwin, Appellant, v Anita H. Salmela, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 3.)

[974 NYS2d 275]

In related custody and visitation proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Guzman, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated May 7, 2012, as, after a hearing, in effect, granted the children’s application to modify a prior order of custody of the same court (Forman, J.), dated September 23, 2009, so as to vacate so much of that order as directed the parents to “offer the children to the other parent” for visitation in the event that they were “unavailable for when they have the children in their care.”

Ordered that the order dated May 7, 2012, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Generally, to modify an existing court-approved custody arrangement, there must be a showing of a change in circumstances such that modification is required in the best interests of the children *(see Matter of Ellis v Burke,*108 AD3d 764 [2013]; *Matter of Gonnard v Guido,*108 AD3d 709 [2013]). “[I]nasmuch as custody determinations turn in large part on assessments of the credibility, character, temperament, and sincerity of the parties, the Family Court’s determination should be disturbed only if it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record” *(Matter of Bacchi v Clancy,*101 AD3d 993, 993 [2012]; *see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 173-174 [1982]).

Here, the Family Court’s determination that there had been a sufficient change in circumstances to warrant modification of the prior order of custody dated September 23, 2009, to the extent of vacating so much of that order as directed the parents to “offer the children to the other parent” for visitation in the event that they were “unavailable for when they have the children in their care,” was supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record. The evidence in the record demonstrates that the provision caused acrimony between the parents *(see Matter of Grunwald v Grunwald,*108 AD3d 537, 539-540 [2013]) and, thus, was not in the best interests of the children.

The father’s remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court. Dillon, J.E, Dickerson, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.