alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Jackson, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 664]

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered April 27, 2012, resentencing defendant, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 17 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful *(see People v Lingle,*16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Concur— Friedman, J.E, Renwick, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 29

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Thursday, April 28, 2005, Fri4 day, April 29, 2005, Saturday, April 30, 2005, or Sunday,

5 May 1, 2005, on a motion offered pursuant to this concur6 rent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it

7 stand recessed or adjourned until Monday, May 9, 2005,

8 at a time to be specified by the Majority Leader or his

9 designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon

10 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem11 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

12 whichever occurs first.

13 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate or his des14 ignee, after consultation with the Minority Leader, shall
 †

2

SCON 29 ES

1 notify the Members of the Senate to reassemble whenever,

2 in his opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the Senate April 28, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 29

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess

of the Senate.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

17 

CA 16-01028 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

 

 

JAMES SAVAGE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

EDWARD D. HANCOCK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, 

LOURDES MARCIAL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

MORRIS & MORRIS, ROCHESTER (DEBORAH M. FIELD OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

PETRONE & PETRONE, P.C., UTICA (MARK J. HALPIN OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

LOURDES MARCIAL, DEFENDANT PRO SE. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William

K. Taylor, J.), entered February 24, 2016. The order denied the

motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment on liability pursuant

to Labor Law § 240 (1) against defendant Edward D. Hancock. 

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by defendant

Lourdes Marcial on November 1, 2016, and by the attorneys for the

parties on October 26 and 31, 2016, and filed in the Monroe County

Clerk’s Office on November 22, 2016,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Amended and Restated Continental Distribution and Licensing Agreement
 By:
    
    Craft Brewers Alliance, Inc., a Washington corporation (as successor in
interest by merger to Widmer Brothers Brewing Company, CBAI)
929 N. Russell
Portland, Oregon 97227and:
    
    Kona Brewery LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company (Kona)
75-5629 Kuakini Highway
Kailua Kona, Hawaii 96740Effective Date:
    
    March 27, 2009 (Effective Date)
  BACKGROUND
 A.
    
    The Products are manufactured: (i) by Kona directly; (ii) by Kona indirectly through
contract brewing arrangements; or (iii) by brewers other than Kona through license brewing
arrangements.B.
    
    CBAI is a TTB-licensed wholesaler of malt beverages.C.
    
    Kona and CBAI desire for CBAI to market and distribute, directly or indirectly through
any affiliate, the Products in the Territory pursuant to the ABI Distributor Agreement.
 AGREEMENT
  Definitions
    Exhibit A




---



##### 



provided however
 Kona Intellectual Property
 Grant of Licenses.
 Representative Samples.
 Notice of Infringements.
 Use of Kona Intellectual Property.
 Usage and Quality Control.




---



##### 



Ownership of Developments.
 Representations and Warranties.
 Distribution and Marketing
    Exclusivity




---



##### 



Expansion of Products
  provided however
 Sale of Kona Merchandise provided however
 Minimum Purchase Obligations
 minus
   Purchase Price
 Exhibit B st st provided however




---



##### 



Compliance with Law
 Confidentiality
 No Disclosure provided however
 Compelled Disclosure
 Confidential Information Defined




---



##### 



provided however
 Destruction/Return of Information provided however
 Indemnification
 CBAI provided however
 Kona provided however
 Indemnification Procedures




---



##### 



Insurance
 Warranties; Limitation of Liability
 Warranty of Authority
 Limitation of Liability
 Termination
 Term
 Termination by Either Party




---



##### 



Termination by CBAI
 Survival of Rights and Obligations
 Notices
 If to Kona, to:Kona Brewery, LLC
75-5629 Kuakini Highway
Kailua Kona, Hawaii 96740
Attn: Mattson Davis
Fax: (808) 334-1884If to CBAI, to:Craft Brewers Alliance, Inc.
929 N. Russell
Portland, Oregon 97227




---



##### 



Attn: Terry Michaelson
Fax: (503) 281-1496
  Miscellaneous
 Assignment; Sublicense
 Entire Agreement
 Amendment
 Severability
 Consent
 Counterparts
 Waiver
 Attorney Fees




---



##### 



Force Majeure
 Governing Law
 Arbitration provided however provided however




---



##### 



CRAFT BREWERS ALLIANCE, INC.
    KONA BREWERY, LLCBy:
    /s/ Mark Moreland
    
    
    By:
    /s/ Mattson DavisMark Moreland
    
    
    Mattson DavisChief Financial Officer
    
    
    President
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CNH Holdings Company on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  September  30, 2005, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, A. Katrina Roche,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/    A. Katrina Roche
------------------------------------------------
A. Katrina Roche
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer for part of reporting period) and Director


November 14, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. BILLY E. DODSON, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-06-459 DECISION

On July 3, 2007, the defendant was sentenced as follows: Count I: A commitment to the Missoula County Detention Center for a term of six (6) months, with credit for time served, for the offense of Theft, a misdemeanor; Count II: Eighty (80) years in the Montana State Prison, which includes fifty (50) years as a persistent felony offender, for the offense of Deceptive Practices, a felony; Count III: Eighty (80) years in the Montana State Prison, which includes fifty (50) years as a persistent felony offender, for the offense of Issuing a Bad Check, a felony; and Count IV: Eighty (80) years in the Montana State Prison, which includes fifty (50) years as a persistent felony offender, for the offense of Theft by Deception or Deprivation of Property, a felony. It was further ordered that twenty-five (25) years on each Count are hereby suspended. Counts I — IV shall run concurrently with each other.

On May 6,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are *40insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 6th day of May, 2010.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
**Exhibit 31.2****Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification**I, Gino Chouinard, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HearUSA, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: November 14, 2006     /s/Gino Chouinard Gino Chouinard     EVP/Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0569

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRYCE COX,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 8, 2020, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 1 2020

04/01/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0569
#### CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC; JP Morgan Chase Bank NA; JP Morgan Chase & Co.; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Walter Lee HALL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-50415

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 22, 2009.

Marcie Lynn Schout, Quilling, Selander, Cummiskey *&*Lownds, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Walter Lee Hall, Jr., pro se.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Walter Lee Hall, Jr., has filed this interlocutory appeal challenging the district court’s orders entering a prehminary injunction against him and denying his motion to vacate the preliminary injunction order. He also moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal and for the preparation of a transcript at government expense. The Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the interlocutory appeal arguing that the district court’s entry of a final judgment establishing a permanent injunction rendered this interlocutory appeal moot.

An appeal from the grant of a preliminary injunction generally becomes moot when the trial court enters a permanent injunction because the order for the preliminary injunction merges into the permanent injunction. *Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.*A *v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.,*527 U.S. 308, 314, 119 S.Ct. 1961, 144 L.Ed.2d 319 (1999). Hall’s arguments on appeal challenge the jurisdiction of the district court over the case and the validity of the preliminary injunction. Hall “will be able to obtain as broad a review on the merits of the order granting the permanent injunction as [he] could have obtained on appeal from the order granting the preliminary injunction.” *Louisiana World Exposition, Inc. v. Logue,*746 F.2d 1033, 1038 (5th Cir.1984). Accordingly, Hall’s appeal from the order granting the preliminary injunction is moot. *See id.*

Hall argues that the case should not be dismissed because the district court lacked jurisdiction to enter the permanent injunction once he filed his notice of interlocutory appeal. This argument is without merit. *See Ry. Labor Executives’ Ass’n v. City of Galveston,*898 F.2d 481, 481 (5th Cir.1990).

The Appellees motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED as moot. Hall’s motions are DENIED as moot.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2559 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2559

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on dichlorprop-p acid, 
dichlorprop-p dimethylamine salt, and dichlorprop-p 2-ethylhexyl ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

  Mr. Burris introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on dichlorprop-p acid, 
dichlorprop-p dimethylamine salt, and dichlorprop-p 2-ethylhexyl ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DICHLORPROP-P ACID, DICHLORPROP-P DIMETHYLAMINE SALT, AND 
              DICHLORPROP-P 2-ETHYLHEXYL ESTER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.25 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to dichlorprop-p acid, 
dichlorprop-p dimethylamine salt, and dichlorprop-p 2-ethylhexyl ester) 
is amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2622 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixture of calcium hydroxide, magnesium 

hydroxide, aluminum silicate, and stearic acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixture of calcium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide, aluminum silicate, and 

stearic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURE OF CALCIUM HYDROXIDE, MAGNE4 SIUM HYDROXIDE, ALUMINUM SILICATE, AND 

5 STEARIC ACID. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2622 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixture of calcium hydroxide 

(CAS No. 1305–62–0), magnesium hydroxide (CAS No. 

1309–42–8), aluminum silicate (CAS No. 70131–50–9), 

and stearic acid (CAS No. 

57–11–4) (provided for in 

subheading 3824.90.92) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2689 

To reduce the temporary suspension of duty on β-Cyfluthrin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce the temporary suspension of duty on β-Cyfluthrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. β-CYFLUTHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.68 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 β-Cyfluthrin) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘Free’’ and inserting ‘‘4.8%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

10 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2689 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) ODWALLA
INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 29, 1998 AS FILED ON FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FILING ON 
FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-29-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,191
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                       588
<INVENTORY>                                      3,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,686
<PP&E>                                          21,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,017
<BONDS>                                            888
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,499
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,054)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,350
<SALES>                                         59,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,088
<CGS>                                           29,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,093
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   258
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,404)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (25)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,379)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,379)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)
        

</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2720 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1, 1, 2-2-Tetrafluoroethene, 

oxidized, polymerized. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1, 1, 2- 

2-Tetrafluoroethene, oxidized, polymerized. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1, 1, 2-2-TETRAFLUOROETHENE, OXIDIZED, PO4 LYMERIZED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.14 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2720 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS