alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2567 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2567

 To suspend temporarily the duty on carbonaceous pastes for electrodes 
                and similar pastes for furnace linings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on carbonaceous pastes for electrodes 
                and similar pastes for furnace linings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARBONACEOUS PASTES FOR ELECTRODES AND SIMILAR PASTES FOR 
              FURNACE LININGS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Carbonaceous        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        pastes for                                                         31/2011.......
                        electrodes and
                        similar pastes
                        for furnace
                        linings (provided
                        for in subheading
                        3801.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2620 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing n-butyl-1,2- 

benzisothiazolin-3-one (Butyl benzisothiazoline), 1-hydroxypyridine-2- 

thione, zinc salt (Zinc pyrithione) and application adjuvants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing 

n-butyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (Butyl 

benzisothiazoline), 1-hydroxypyridine-2-thione, zinc salt 

(Zinc pyrithione) and application adjuvants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2620 IS

1 SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING N-BUTYL-1,2- 

2 BENZISOTHIAZOLIN-3-ONE (BUTYL 

3 BENZISOTHIAZOLINE), 1-HYDROXYPYRIDINE4 2-THIONE, ZINC SALT (ZINC PYRITHIONE) 

5 AND APPLICATION ADJUVANTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures containing n-butyl1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one 

(Butyl benzisothiazoline) 

(CAS No. 4299–07–4), 1- 

hydroxypyridine-2-thione, 

zinc salt (Zinc pyrithione) 

(CAS No. 13463–41–7) and 

application adjuvants (provided for in subheading 

3808.99.08) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

12 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Terence W. Tsang, in my capacity as Executive Vice-President, Chief Operating
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Ashworth, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

      1. the Quarterly Report of the Registrant, on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended January 31, 2004 (the "Report"), to which this certification is attached
as an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



Dated:  March 15, 2004        /s/Terence W. Tsang
      ---------------------   -------------------
                              Terence W. Tsang
                              Executive Vice-President, Chief Operating Officer,
                              Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### Adolfo GONZALEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-74308.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*609Submitted May 12, 2009.*

Filed May 22, 2009.

Ali Taheripour, Esquire, Law Offices of Mgdesyan & Taheripour, Sherman Oaks, CA, for Petitioner.

Kate D. Balaban, Esquire, Peter H. Matson, Esquire, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ali Tah-eripour, Esquire, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los An-geles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Adolfo Gonzalez-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings, *Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey,*542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir.2008). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We dismiss the petition as to Gonzalez-Rodriguez’s asylum and withholding of removal claims because the particular social group he asserts to the court is different from the social group he argued to the BIA, such that his claim is unexhausted, *see Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004), and Gonzalez-Rodriguez has waived any other challenge to the agency’s nexus finding, *see Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

We lack jurisdiction to review Gonzalez-Rodriguez’s contention regarding ineffective assistance of counsel because he failed to raise that issue before the BIA. *See Ontiveros-Lopez v. INS,*213 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring ineffective assistance of counsel claims to be presented first to the BIA).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Gonzalez-Rodriguez failed to show it was more likely than not that he would be tortured if he returns to El Salvador. *See Santos-Lemus,*542 F.3d at 747-48.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                                      APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                              0
<PP&E>                                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                                0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    76,477
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                 14,972
<OTHER-SE>                                                              (91,449)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                                  0
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                              0
<CGS>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            76,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         (76,477)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     (76,477)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            (76,477)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                               (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             (.001)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, James A. Bianco, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CTI BioPharma Corp.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

| Dated: April 30, 2015 |   | By:    |   | /s/ James A. Bianco                   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                  |   |   |   | James A. Bianco, M.D.                 |
|                  |   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
No. 935.

#### Wright *v.*First Joint Stock Land Bank of Fort Wayne et al.

March 16, 1942.

*Mr. Samuel E. Cook*for petitioner. *Mr: John D. Shoaff*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and motion for leave to proceed further *in forma pauperis,*denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 24848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12086]

[[Page 24848]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1132-000]

Palmco Power NJ, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

May 18, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Palmco Power NJ, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application 
includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is June 8, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail [email protected] or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12086 Filed 5-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Funding For Research 
-  Understanding Types of Grants And Funding 

# Clinical Research Center Grant (P50 Clinical Trial Optional)

The NIDCD invites applications for Clinical Research Center Grants designed to advance the diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and amelioration of human communication disorders. For this announcement, “clinical research” is defined as research involving individuals with communication disorders or data/tissues from individuals with a communication disorder. Examples of such research include, but are not limited to, studies of the prevention, pathogenesis, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, management, or epidemiology of a disease or disorder of hearing, balance, taste, smell, voice, speech, or language. Applications may propose a clinical trial but are not required to (optional).

This announcement targets applicant institutions with demonstrated ability to conduct clinical research in human communication disorders. The P50 grant supports a research program in which an interdisciplinary team of investigators works in a clearly defined central theme of mutual scientific interest. This mechanism facilitates economy of effort, space, and equipment, and accelerates the acquisition of knowledge by stimulating cooperation among clinical investigators whose projects are directed toward a common goal.
                    - Guidelines and application process

## Staff Contacts

                    - Division of Scientific Programs

October 14, 2021
*

The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3847

___________

Franklin H. Burch, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

Kansas City School District; Kansas * District of Missouri.

City Federation of Teachers & *

School Related Personnel Local 691, * [UNPUBLISHED]

AFL-CIO; Judy Morgan; Delores *

Pittman; Rex Hull, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 30, 2003

Filed: May 12, 2003

___________

Before MELLOY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Franklin H. Burch appeals the district court's*

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in Burch's employment-related lawsuit. After careful review of the record,

see Eddings v. City of Hot Springs, Ark., 323 F.3d 596, 600 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard
-2-

of review), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's thorough and wellreasoned opinion, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we also deny Burch's pending motions.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Robert Bryan Finch, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00042

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 27636 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We n ote that the appellant, Robert Bryan Finch, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 22, 20 19 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
NO. 07-01-0244-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	OCTOBER 30, 2001

	______________________________

	JOSEPH WADE LONG,

			Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 13,166-C; HON. JACK D. YOUNG, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN, and JOHNSON, JJ.

	Joseph Wade Long (appellant) appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery.  His court-appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), therein asserting that a review of the record shows no reversible error.  So too did she move to withdraw as appellant’s counsel.  Appellant was informed, by his counsel and this court in writing, of his right to review the record and file a pro se brief.  The deadline by which he had to submit the pro se brief was October 22, 2001.  To date, we have not received such a brief.  

	With regard to the Anders brief, appellant’s counsel stated that she diligently reviewed the record and that, in her opinion, it reflected no reversible error.  Prior to so concluding, counsel did note potential concern in various aspects of the trial.  However, she then explained why same did not warrant reversal. 

	 We have conducted our own independent review of the record to assess the accuracy of counsel’s representations to this court.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W. 2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App.1991) (requiring same).  Upon doing so, we agree that counsel is correct and that no reversible error appears of record.  Appellant was properly indicted.  The State submitted evidence legally and factually sufficient to support appellant’s guilt.  The jury was properly charged.1  Furthermore, the punishment fell within the range allowed by statute.  Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.

	                                                     		Brian Quinn 

           	                                                   		   Justice 

Do not publish.
[938 NE2d 1002, 912 NYS2d 568]

#### State of New York et al., Plaintiffs, v Philip Morris Incorporated et al., Respondents, and Dosal Tobacco Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Argued October 19, 2010;

decided November 17, 2010

*899APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Troutman Sanders LLP (William H. Hurd,*of the Virginia bar, admitted pro hac vice, and *Ashley L. Taylor, Jr.,*of the Virginia bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), *Law Offices of Lisa M. Solomon,*New York City *(Lisa M. Solomon*of counsel), *Fredericks Peebles & Morgan, LLP (Joseph V. Messineo,*of the *900Arizona and Nebraska bars, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), and *Jones Garneau LLP,*Scarsdale *(Michael K. Stanton, Jr.,*of counsel), for appellants.

*Kirkland & Ellis LLP (Stephen R. Patton,*of the Illinois bar, admitted pro hac vice, and *Douglas G. Smith,*of the Illinois bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), *Winston & Strawn LLP,*New York City *(Alexander Shaknes*of counsel), *Kirkland & Ellis LLP (Peter A. Bellacosa*and *Mark A. Rasmussen*of counsel), *Howrey LLP (Robert J. Brookhiser,*of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, and *Elizabeth B. McCallum*of counsel), *Leader & Berkon LLP,*New York City *(Joshua K. Leader*of counsel), *Greenberg Traurig, LLP (Irving Scher*and *Jeffrey B. Sklaroff*of counsel), and *Paul B. Garland,*New York City, for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Appeal dismissed, without costs. As the nonparticipating tobacco manufacturers are not required by Supreme Court’s order to arbitrate and will not be bound by the arbitration, they are not aggrieved.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

Thornburg Mortgage, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statements (No. 333-125125 and No. 333-147968), both on Form S-3 of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc., of our report dated February 27, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. andsubsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated income statements, statements of shareholders’ equity, and statements of cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2007, andthe related financial statement schedule – mortgage loans on real estate and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report onForm 10-K of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Albuquerque, New Mexico 

February 27, 2008