alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24.5

 

SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC.POWER OF ATTORNEY

SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB

            The undersigned, in hiscapacity as a director of SI Diamond Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), after reviewing the Company's Form 10-KSB, does herebyappoint Douglas P. Baker, his true and lawful attorney to execute in his name, place and stead, in his capacity as a Director ofsaid Company, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and all instruments necessaryor incidental in connection therewith, including all amendments, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Said attorney shall have the full power and authority to do and perform, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any andall capacities, every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done in the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes asthe undersigned might or could do in person, the undersigned hereby ratifying and approving the acts of said attorney.

            IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this instrument this 11th day of March, 2003.

                                        /s/ Dave Sincox                                                             Name: Dave Sincox
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Patrick W. Hurley, Chief Financial Officer of Sport-Haley, Inc., certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Sport-Haley, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 25, 2005

|/s/PATRICK W. HURLEYPatrick W. Hurley
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 7, 2020

NO. 03

- 18

- 0051 4

- CR

Ronaldo Zabaleta

- Martinez, Appellant

v.
The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWI N, B AKER, AND TRIANA AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record an d t he parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Bec aus e appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2668 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2668

 To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on erasers of vulcanized 
           rubber other than hard rubber or cellular rubber.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on erasers of vulcanized 
           rubber other than hard rubber or cellular rubber.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ERASERS OF VULCANIZED RUBBER OTHER THAN HARD RUBBER OR 
              CELLULAR RUBBER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.51 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to erasers of vulcanized rubber 
other than hard rubber or cellular rubber) is amended by striking the 
date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wolverine Tube, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 2, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, James E. Deason, Chief
Financial Officer of Wolverine Tube, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Wolverine Tube, Inc. and will be retained by Wolverine Tube,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

/s/  James E. Deason
-----------------------
James E. Deason
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2005
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, David J. Mickelson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Redhook Ale Brewery, Incorporated; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annualreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions); (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:March 26, 2008       BY: /s/ David J. Mickelson              David J. Mickelson         *President and Chief Operating Officer*
# Incident Management Teams

An incident management team (IMT) is dispatched or mobilized during complex emergency incidents to provide a command and control infrastructure in order to manage the operational, logistical, informational, planning, fiscal, community, political, and safety issues associated with complex incidents.

IMTs include people from federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial entities.  They volunteer to perform the collateral responsibilities of incident management response in addition to their regular employment duties.

Complex incident management teams (CIMT) are available for assignment to manage large-scale, complex incidents anywhere in the United States. They most commonly respond to large wildfires, but CIMTs can be assigned to any complex all-risk situation including VIP visits or multi-day special events, search and rescue efforts, and hurricanes, floods, and other disasters. Interagency wildland fire teams were assigned to assist FEMA after the September 11th attack, the 2003 Columbia shuttle recovery effort, and Hurricane Katrina.

## Firefighters

-  Crews 
-  Overhead 
-  Smokejumpers 
-  Incident Management Teams
#### Paul Beaubrun, Respondent, v Anton Boltachev et al., Appellants, and Mouhamed Mbengue et al., Respondents.

[974 NYS2d 782]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered November 26, 2012, which denied the motion of defendants Anton Boltachev and Raneen Taxi, Inc. (collectively Boltachev) for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied in this action where plaintiff was injured when, while attempting to enter Boltachev’s taxi, he was struck by a taxi driven by defendant Mbengue. The court properly determined that triable issues of fact exist inasmuch as the drivers provided conflicting accounts of the accident *(see Ramos v Rojas,*37 AD3d 291 [1st Dept 2007]). Boltachev contends that his taxi was stopped when he was hit in the rear by Mbengue’s taxi. Mbengue, on the other hand, maintains that Boltachev’s taxi cut off his vehicle in order to pick up a potential customer (plaintiff). The police accident report also does not reflect damage to the rear of Boltachev’s cab, and it is not the court’s function on a motion for summary judgment to assess credibility *(see id.*at 292). Furthermore, even accepting Boltachev’s version of the accident, issues of fact exist as to whether Boltachev violated 34 RCNY 4-11 (c) when picking up plaintiff, and whether this violation was a proximate cause of the accident. Concur — Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Freedman, Richter and Feinman, JJ.
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance



 




Exhibit 10.90




FLAGA GmbH

Flaga Straße 1, 2100 Leobendorf

FN 185471b im Firmenbuch des Landesgerichtes Korneuburg




Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG

att. Mr. Peter Straubinger

Am Stadtpark 9

1030 WIEN




Bratislava, July 24, 2007




Account No. 1-00.640.763/100; 550-70.678.248/004; 550-70.678.248/100; /Amendment Offer




Ladies und Gentlemen,




Reference is made to the debit balances, which are currently shown on our aforementioned accounts
held with your bank (hereinafter collectively the “Accounts”), and the underlying legal
relationship between our company and your bank. We hereby offer you to amend the aforementioned
legal relationship (hereinafter the “Legal Relationship”) as follows:



QUOTE




Any debit balances which are currently shown on the Accounts will be repaid to the Bank not later
than July 24, 2008. The aforementioned Legal Relationship will end with the repayment. All possible
securities under and or in connection with the aforementioned Legal Relationship shall remain in
full force and effect.



UNQUOTE




Apart from the amendments offered herein, the aforementioned Legal Relationship shall remain
unchanged.



If you accept the present Amendment Offer, we shall pay you a one-time management fee in the amount
of EUR 3.250,—.



You can accept the present offer on or before July 26, 2007 by debiting the aforementioned
management fee to our account No 1-00.640.763/100 held with you. We hereby irrevocably authorize
you to make such debit on our behalf and for our account. Your acceptance of the present offer will
come into full force and effect by virtue of such debit only, irrespective of whether and when we
may be informed about your acceptance.



Kind regards,




FLAGA GmbH




The Guarantor hereby fully agrees to and accepts the terms and conditions of this Amendment Offer.



Date: July 31, 2007




	 	 	 	 	 
	UGI Corporation	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name: Robert W. Krick	 	 
	 

	 	Title: Vice President & Treasurer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
(pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350))

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Gordon H. Link, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
NaPro BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:



|Date: October 24, 2003 |  | /s/GORDON H. LINK, JR.Gordon H. Link, Jr. Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NaPro BioTherapeutics, Inc. and will be retained by NaPro
BioTherapeutics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.02
 
  a)
    
    The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2008
filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; andb)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    
    /s/ Peter L. BuzyPeter L. BuzyChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000892381
<NAME>                                 F-1000 Futures Fund L.P., Series IX
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                   1,826,504
<SECURITIES>                                             4,836,943
<RECEIVABLES>                                               56,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         6,719,883
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           6,719,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      118,788
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                               6,601,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             6,719,883
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           539,404
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            90,646
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            448,758
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               448,758
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                89.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Joshua Lutrell, Andrew Davis, Moises

Roman, Joe Rodriguez; and on behalf of

all other persons similarly situated

,

Appellant s ’

,

v.

El Paso County, et al.

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 0 90

- C V

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2014DCV3070 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee’ s third motion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until March 9 , 201 7

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE APPELLEE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jo Anne Bernal , the attorney for Appellee’s

,

prepare the brief for Appellee’s and forward the same to this Court on or before March 9, 2017

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7 th day of February , 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
1

The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1238

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Sammy Jefferson, also known as *

Bey Bey, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: July 14, 2009

Filed: July 28, 2009

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Sammy Jefferson appeals the 235-month prison sentence the district court1

imposed after he pleaded guilty to drug-conspiracy and drug-distribution charges. His

counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). In two pro se briefs, Jefferson appears to contend that the appeal

waiver in this case should be invalidated, because it is so broad as to be
-2-

unconstitutional. He also raises sentencing issues, ineffective-assistance-of-counsel

claims, and prosecutorial-misconduct claims.

Jefferson entered his guilty plea pursuant to a plea agreement in which he

waived his right to bring a direct appeal, and his right to bring a 28 U.S.C. § 2255

challenge on any ground other than ineffective assistance of counsel or prosecutorial

misconduct. We will enforce the appeal waiver here. The record reflects that (1) the

court accepted Jefferson’s plea, applied the plea-agreement stipulations, and sentenced

Jefferson within the resulting Guidelines range, thereby satisfying the conditions

precedent to the appeal waiver; (2) Jefferson had read the plea agreement, had

discussed it with his attorney, understood its terms, and was aware of the appeal

waiver; (3) his arguments fall within the scope of the appeal waiver; and (4) no

injustice would result from enforcing the appeal waiver, because Jefferson was

sentenced consistently with his stipulations in the negotiated plea agreement. See

United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing

enforceability of appeal waiver); see also United States v. Estrada-Bahena, 201 F.3d

1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issue for appeal beyond the scope of the appeal

waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal and grant defense counsel’s motion to

withdraw on condition that counsel inform appellant about the procedures for filing

petitions for rehearing and for certiorari. We also deny Jefferson’s motions to dismiss

counsel and to appoint new counsel.

______________________________
**EXHIBIT 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.333-114166, 333-102988, 333-85160, 333-61866, 333-25661, 333-32159, 333-23085, 333-17501,333-03507, and 333-107755) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-116624, 333-30558,333-46990, 333-81243, 333-105694, and 333-105693), pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan, the1993 Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 2003Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 2004 Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Incentive Plan of QuestcorPharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2006, with respect to the financialstatements and schedule of Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005./s/ Odenberg, Ullakko, Muranishi & Co. LLPSan Francisco, California