alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees for the Bliss & Laughlin Steel facility, in Buffalo, NY, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows: 

*Facility:*                         Bliss & Laughlin Steel facility.                     

*Location:*                         Buffalo, NY.                     

*Job Titles and/or Job Duties:*                         All employees.                     

*Period of Employment:*                         January 1, 1948 through December 31, 1998.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV*.                     

Dated: February 2, 2009. 

Christine M. Branche, 

Acting Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. E9-2559 Filed 2-5-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Laurel Capital Group, Inc.

In connection with the Annual Report of Laurel Capital Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edwin
R. Maus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

/s/ Edwin R. Maus
-----------------
Edwin R. Maus
President and Chief Executive Officer
September 29, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2830 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2830

  To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to 
clarify that uncertified States and Indian tribes have the authority to 
     use certain payments for certain noncoal reclamation projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 3, 2009

  Mr. Bingaman (for himself, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Udall of New 
Mexico, Mr. Udall of Colorado, and Mr. Bennet) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to 
clarify that uncertified States and Indian tribes have the authority to 
     use certain payments for certain noncoal reclamation projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION.

    (a) Limitation on Funds.--Section 409(b) of the Surface Mining 
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1239(b)) is amended by 
inserting ``or section 411(h)(1)'' after ``section 402(g)''.
    (b) Use of Funds.--Section 411(h)(1)(D)(ii) of the Surface Mining 
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1240a(h)(1)(D)(ii)) is 
amended by inserting ``or 409'' after ``section 403''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 10, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227, or (414) 231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, March 10, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. Central Time. You can submit written comments to the panel by faxing the comments to (414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53201-2221, or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     Please contact Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or (414) 231-2360 for more information.                

The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

Dated: January 13, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E9-1278 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 29 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 29

    Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 28, 2005

Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Reid) submitted the following concurrent 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, April 28, 2005, Friday, April 29, 2005, Saturday, April 30, 
2005, or Sunday, May 1, 2005, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until Monday, May 9, 2005, at a time to be 
specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate or his designee, after 
consultation with the Minority Leader, shall notify the Members of the 
Senate to reassemble whenever, in his opinion, the public interest 
shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          51,048
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,978
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               219,159
<PP&E>                                         457,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,383
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 681,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          198,192
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,000
<COMMON>                                         7,194
<OTHER-SE>                                     258,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   681,479
<SALES>                                        217,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               262,465
<CGS>                                          242,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  371,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,239
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (128,272)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (128,272)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (128,272)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

The State of Texas for the Best Interest and 

Protection of L.A.

No. 06-15-00029-CV

Appeal from the County Court of Hopkins 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. M15-00051). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the order of the 

court below. Therefore, we reverse the order for administration of psychoactive medication, 

effective immediately.

We further order that the appellee, The State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JULY 17, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Vera Zeldin, Appellant, v W. Roy Michaelis, M.D., et al., Respondents.

[963 NYS2d 650]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered June 1, 2011, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered April 27, 2011, which granted defendants’ motions and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Plaintiff alleges that the four defendant physicians failed to refer plaintiffs decedent to a cardiologist or for testing and/or to recognize that decedent had a tear in his aorta after a motor vehicle accident on June 20, 2004, which failures eventually led to an aortic dissection, causing his death on September 29, 2004.

Supreme Court properly found that all defendants met their burden on summary judgment. W Roy Michaelis, Jr., M.D., the internist who treated decedent’s hypertension until April 2004, established that he did not depart from accepted medical practice in continuing to prescribe antihypertensive medications for decedent, whose high blood pressure was resistant to treatment. Moreover, the alleged aortic tear, for which there was no record evidence, could only have existed after the motor vehicle accident, after decedent had ended his treatment with Dr. Michaelis *(see Burtman v Brown,*97 AD3d 156 [1st Dept 2012]). As to Montefiore Medical Center, no evidence of malpractice has been submitted.

After his motor vehicle accident, when decedent presented to John Gelfand, D.O., decedent presented no signs or symptoms which would have led Dr. Gelfand to conclude that an aortic tear was present. The symptom of severe chest wall pain was absent. The temporary chest wall pain which decedent did report was easily attributable to another cause, namely, the motor vehicle accident *(see Rivera v Greenstein,*79 AD3d 564, 568-569 [1st Dept 2010]; *Shields v Kleiner,*93 AD3d 710 [2d Dept 2012]).

Dr. Gelfand referred decedent to Luba Karlin, M.D., for a neurological examination, and to Mohammed K. Nour, M.D., for an orthopedic examination. The orthopedic examination was conducted by Dr. Nour’s physician’s assistant, Ahmed Jawad. Neither Dr. Karlin nor Dr. Nour had a duty to decedent to refer *642him to a cardiologist, since their duty was “ ‘limited to those medical functions undertaken by the physician and relied upon by the patient’ ” (Burtman, 97 AD3d at 161-162; *Chulla v DiStefano,*242 AD2d 657, 658 [2d Dept 1997], *Iv dismissed*91 NY2d 921 [1998]).

Concur—Tom, J.E, Acosta, Román, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 5, 2018

No. 04-16-00806-CR

Roger SALDANA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Frio County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-08-00031-CRF

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On December 29, 2017, this court ordered the parties to file written responses to concerns 

raised in that order regarding appellant’s motions to supplement the appellate record. After 

receiving the responses, the court ordered the motions would be carried with the appeal and 

resolved by the submission panel. On April 4, 2018, the State filed a motion seeking to 

withdraw its response to our prior order and opposing the requested supplementation. The State’s 

motion will be CARRIED WITH THE APPEAL and resolved by the submission panel.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of April, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Ted I. Kaminer, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.



|                       |  |                                                
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 11, 2006 |  | /s/ Ted I. Kaminer*                            
|                       |  | Ted I. Kaminer, Senior Vice President and Chief
|                       |  | Financial Officer                              
|                       |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)   

---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 2564** 

SAAD USMAN LODHI , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. FAIRFAX COUNTY, Board of Supervisors/Virginia , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. James C. Cacheris , Senior District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 01108

- JCC

- JFA )

Submitted : March 26 , 2013 Decided: March 28, 2013

Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Saad Usman Lodhi, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah Wallace Townes, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Saad Usman Lodhi appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Lodhi v . Fairfax Cnty. , No. 1:12

- cv - 01108

- JCC

- JFA (E.D. Va. Dec. 21, 2012)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFF IRMED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6665
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DENITRA CARMITA LEWIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:06-cr-00057-gee-jgw-4) Submitted: June 30, 2008 Decided: July 8, 2008 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Denitra Carmita Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Albert Lustig, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* SeeHouston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). -2- PER CURIAM: Denitra Carmita Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). In a criminal case, a notice of appeal must be filed within ten days after the order appealed from is entered. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). However, with or without a motion, the district court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal for an additional thirty days upon a finding of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). While the district court dismissed Lewis’ motion for sentence reduction on March 12, 2008, the district court identified March 22, 2008, as the “effective date” of the order. On April 21, 2008, Lewis filed a notice of appeal. * While the notice of appeal was filed after the ten-day appeal period expired, it was filed within the thirty-day excusable neglect period. Therefore, we remand the case to the district court for a determination as to whether Lewis has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions-3- are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

REMANDED
Setting Up Your Voice Mailbox 

The first time you access voicemail you will be asked to enroll your mailbox. Pre-recorded prompts will 

guide you through the process, which includes recording your name, recording a greeting, and changing 

your temporary PIN - 12345. Creating a new minimum 5-digit PIN is mandatory. 

Note: Do not hang up until you receive the system prompt: “You have finished enrollment.”

Accessing Voicemail From Your Phone 

1. Press the MESSAGES button. 

2. Enter your PIN (12345) followed by #. 

• Press 1 to listen to new messages.

• Press 2 to send a message.

• Press 3 to review old messages

• Press 4 to access Setup options.

From Offsite 

1. Dial your own 10 digit phone number. Example: 303-239-1234 

2. When voicemail answers, press the * key. 

3. Enter your 10 digit mailbox ID number followed by the # key. Your ID is your 10 digit extension. 

4. Enter your PIN followed by the # key. 

Changing Voicemail Options 

Use the following procedures to change the setup of your voicemail after you have completed initial 

enrollment. Re-recording Your Greeting 

1. Access your mailbox. 

2. Press 4 for setup options. 

3. Press 1 for Greetings, and to change Greetings. 
Re-recording Your Name

1. Access your mailbox.

2. Press 4 for setup options.

3. Press 3 for personal settings.

4. Press 2 to change name.

Changing Your PIN/Password

1. Access your mailbox.

2. Press 4 for setup options.

3. Press 3 for personal settings.

4. Press 1 to change PIN
#### Saman Safadjou, Respondent, v Azine Mohammadi, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[963 NYS2d 897]

Appeal from a corrected order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Richard A. Dollinger, A.J.), entered January 6, 2011. The corrected order denied the motion of defendant to dismiss the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Safadjou v Mohammadi*([appeal No. 3] 105 AD3d 1423 [2013]).

Present—Smith, J.E, Peradotto, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.