alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The District Court of the 21st Judicial District. County of Ravalli.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. KRISTIAN K. ZSUPNIK, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-04-13 DECISION

On December 31, 2009, the defendant was sentenced for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence to the following: Count I: Five (5) years in the Montana State Prison, for the offense of Assault on a Peace Officer or Judicial Officer, a felony; Count II: Five (5) years in the Montana State Prison, for the offense of Assault on a Peace Officer or Judicial Officer, a felony, to run concurrently with Count I; Count III: Ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison, with ten (10) years suspended, for the offense of Criminal Mischief, a felony, to run consecutively to Counts I and II; Count IV: Ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison, with ten (10) years suspended, for the offense of Criminal Mischief, a felony, to run consecutively to Counts I and II and concurrently to Count III; and Count V: A six (6) month commitment to the Ravalli County Detention Center, for the offense of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol or Drugs, a misdemeanor, to run concurrent to Count I.

On August 5, 2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. Counsel at the District Court level, Ron Piper, appeared via videoconference. The state was represented by County Attorney, George Corn, who also appeared via videoconference.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division *75that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 5th day of August, 2010.

DATED this 13th day of August, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
#### Shear *against*Mallory and Bryant, Overseers of the Poor of the town of Hillsdale.

Although, sopie cases, an ’ISpwiffon* lonslderatjon6 *jromh*f*“hlud paítyl’u^whosE Si7ewasemade, iter The’eonsL from «fe p°ainpfáe^Lmádg jo frim, or for aetionPPPcannot

^e?fer^|rs df g&óTwS» *" |hJrpwation.DS

fH BKBOR,.On eer/i.órarí-to a iustice’s-court, ‘

, ' Tfié’ defendant^ in error; who were plaintiffs in the court below, brought an- action against the plaintiff in error,.on-.a.prbmisff alleged to have been made -by’him, for; the maintenance *of%*bastard child, born of the body of his daughter. It appeared, op the trial, that the defendant below -had taken- 'out a warrant against the putative father of the bastard child, and that, when he was arrested, the defendant settled with him,, and- took his note,’ and no further proceedings appear to have been had 4 • • t i i i . , agains^ tpeputative1 father* . It also appeared^ that the defend-at-sevefal times, acknowledged that' he hád-to- máint-am Í&P child, and that he hád promised one *Hogcboom,*who- had married the mother of the child, that if he-would give up (lie property which the defendant had-given the mother, he, the de-' fendant, would maintain the child;-and that *Ifogeboom*did give Up1 the property,' The1.: overseers had expended more than pwenty-fiye dollars jn the support of the-child. Judgment was l^yea-in JfMow. fer iba -defe^dafits’ i® ■

*-P$r Gufiam,*

The promise made by the defendant below, to maintain tfie b&stgrd child, cannot be made tQ *emn*to the benefit *497of the plaintiffs below. In general, it is necessary that the Con¡«¡¡deration on which a promise is founded, should move from the party in whose favour the promise is made. There are some cases, however, where a parfy in whose favour the promise is made, may maintain an action, although the consideration moves from another person ; but, in the present case, the consideration did not move from the plaintiffs below, nor was the promise made to them, or for their benefit. It does not appear that they were the overseers of the poor at the time the putative father was proceeded against, and, admitting that the promise to maintain this child enured to the benefit of the then overseers, they are not a body corporate so that their- successors can sue ifi their own name upon such promise. The judgment must, therefore, be reversed.

Judgment reversed,
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1307 KA 12-00295 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PEDRO RAMOS-ROMAN, ALSO KNOWN AS EDGAR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (NICHOLAS P. DIFONZO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ASHLEY R. SMALL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boller, A.J.), rendered July 21, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree. It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]). We agree with defendant that the oral and written waivers of his right to appeal from his conviction of that crime do not encompass his challenge to the severity of his sentence and thus do not foreclose our review of that challenge ( see People v Maracle , 19 NY3d 925, 927-928). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: December 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2512 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 

equipment. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

manufacturing equipment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.84.85 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain manufacturing equipment) is amended— 

7 (1) by amending the article description to read 

8 as follows: ‘‘Extruders to be used in production of 

9 radial tires designed for off-the-highway use with a 

10 rim measuring 63.5 cm or more in diameter (such 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2512 IS

1 tires provided for in subheading 4011.20.10, 

2 4011.61.00, 4011.63.00, 4011.69.00, 4011.92.00, 

3 4011.94.40, or 4011.99.45), numerically controlled, 

4 or parts thereof (provided for in subheading 

5 8477.20.00 or 8477.90.85)’’; and 

6 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 92 (Thursday, May 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11269]



[[Page 22800]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending April 30, 
2009

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0102.
    Date Filed: April 29, 2009.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 599--Resolution 010c TC3 Special Passenger 
Amending Resolution between Japan, Korea (Rep. of) and China (excluding 
Hong Kong SAR and Macao SAR), and between Japan and Korea (Rep. of) 
(Memo 1293).
    Intended effective date: 15 May 2009.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
 [FR Doc. E9-11269 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12735]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, 
and the Territory of Puerto Rico)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Monday, July 13, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7979.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Monday, July 13, 2009, at 12:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Sallie Chavez. 
For more information please contact Ms. Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 
954-423-7979, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 
340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: May 27, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-12735 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION

I, William H. Campbell, Acting Chief Financial Officer , certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Earthworks
Entertainment, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this quarterly report fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





        Dated: February 17, 2005        /s/ WILLIAM H. CAMPBELL
                                        -----------------------
                                        William H. Campbell
                                        Chief Financial Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 996 

To improve the Veterans Beneficiary Travel Program of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2005 

Mr. BURNS (for himself, Mr. ENZI, and Mr. THUNE) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To improve the Veterans Beneficiary Travel Program of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Road to 

5 Health Care Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT OF VETERANS BENEFICIARY TRAV7 EL PROGRAM. 

8 (a) PAYMENTS FOR CERTAIN ADDITIONAL MEDICAL

9 CARE.— 
2 

•S 996 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 111(b)(1) of title 

2 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

3 the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(G) A veteran whose travel is in connection 

5 with treatment or care for a non-service-connected 

6 disability at a non-Department facility, if the treat7 ment or care— 

8 ‘‘(i) is provided upon the recommendation 

9 of medical personnel of the Department; and 

10 ‘‘(ii) is not available at the Department fa11 cility at which such recommendation is made.’’. 

12 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

13 by paragraph (1) shall take effect on October 1, 

14 2005, and shall apply with respect to fiscal years 

15 after fiscal year 2005. 

16 (b) CALCULATION OF EXPENSES OF TRAVEL.— 

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

18 provision of law, in calculating expenses of travel for 

19 purposes of the Veterans Beneficiary Travel Pro20 gram, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall utilize 

21 the mileage reimbursement rates for the use on offi22 cial business of privately owned vehicles, as pre23 scribed by the Administrator of General Services 

24 under section 5707(b) of title 5, United States Code. 
3 

•S 996 IS

1 (2) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term 

2 ‘‘Veterans Beneficiary Travel Program’’ means the 

3 program of payment or reimbursement for necessary 

4 expenses of travel of veterans and their beneficiaries 

5 prescribed under sections 111 and 1728 of title 38, 

6 United States Code, and under any other provisions 

7 of law administered by the Secretary of Veterans Af8 fairs for payment or reimbursement for such travel 

9 expenses. 

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dwayne Faust, Appellant.

[610 NYS2d 821]

—Appeal by the defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), all rendered March 11, 1991, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Indictment No. 11720/89, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under Indictment No. 14089/89, murder in the second degree (two counts), attempted murder in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree under Indictment No. 58/90, and attempted murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree under Indictment No. 274/90, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00754-CV

VERDE ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC and Robert Thomae,

Appellants

v.

SGET DUVAL OIL I, LLC,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-19-230

Honorable Baldemar Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE WATKINS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appellants’ motion to dismiss is 

GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. 

We order that appellee SGET Duval Oil I, LLC recover its costs of this appeal, if any, from 

appellants Verde Energy Solutions LLC and Robert Thomae. 

SIGNED February 12, 2020.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           Subsidiaries of the Company

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                Doing Business
Subsidiary                       State of Incorporation                    under the Following Names
----------                       ----------------------                  ------------------------------
<S>                              <C>                                     <C>
Sign Builders of
    America, Inc.                     Delaware                           Sign Builders of America, Inc.

Diamond Tech One, Inc.                Delaware                           Diamond Tech One, Inc

SDI Acquisition Corp.                 Texas                              SDI Acquisition Corp.

Plasmatron Coatings and                                                  Plasmatron Coatings and
     Systems, Inc.                    Pennsylvania                            Systems, Inc.

Field Emission Picture
     Element Technology, Inc.         Delaware                           FEPET, Inc.

Electronic Billboard                                                     Electronic Billboard
     Technology, Inc.                 Delaware                                Technology, Inc.
</TABLE>


                                    Page 64
Unassociated Document


    LOAN
      AGREEMENT

    (English
      Translation)

    


    This
      is
      an agreement between the following parties:

    


    
      	
              Party
                A: 

            	
              Wennan
                Li

            
	 	 
	
              Party
                B:

            	
              Perfectenergy
                (Shanghai), Ltd.

            


    

    


    The
      parties hereto enter into this agreement voluntarily, after friendly
      negotiations, to enable Party B to borrow money from Party A, as
      follows:

    


    
      	 	
              1.

            	
              To
                address Party B’s cash flow issue, Party A agrees to loan Party B Three
                Hundred Thousand RMB.

            


    

    


    
      	 	
              2.

            	
              Party
                B agrees to borrow the money described above for cash flow, and agrees
                to
                pay Party A interest at the rate of 7.2% per
                annum.

            


    

    


    
      	 	
              3.

            	
              Funding
                method: Party A shall transfer the entire sum into Party B’s account, and
                the parties agree that interest shall begin on March 16,
                2006.

            


    

    


    
      	 	
              4.

            	
              Term
                of loan: March 16, 2006 to March 15, 2007. At the end of the term,
                Party B
                shall repay Party A the borrowed sum in one
                payment.

            


    

    


    
      	 	
              5.

            	
              Payment
                of interest: Party B shall pay Party A interest on a quarterly
                basis.

            


    

    


    
      	 	
              6.

            	
              The
                parties hereto agree to resolve any disputes amicably.
                

            


    

    


    
      	 	
              7.

            	
              This
                agreement will be in two originals, with each party holding one.
                This
                agreement will be effective upon the parties’ signatures and
                stamps.

            


    

    


    
      	
              Party
                A: Wennan Li

            	
              Party
                B: Perfectenergy (Shanghai), Ltd.

            
	 	 
	
              Signature:

            	
              Signature:

            
	 	 
	
              Seal:

            	
              Company
                Seal:

            
	 	 
	
              Date:
                3-15-2006
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350of Chapter 63**

**of Title 18 of the United StatesCode**

 

I,John E. Rooney, the chief executive officer of United States CellularCorporation, certify that (i) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe first quarter of 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of United States CellularCorporation.

 

 
|   | /s/ John E. Rooney |
|--------|--------------------|
|   | John E. Rooney     |
|   | May 10, 2010  |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 has been provided to United States Cellular Corporation and will beretained by U.S. Cellular and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----