alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WEIGHT 

(LBS) CU FT KIT COST

004080 Solar Panel Kit (Flex) 50 1.67 $ 1,372.33

004100 Mountain Top Accessory Kit 25 2.60 $177.72

004240 Airbase Accessory Kit 25 2.60 $ 4,267.93

4244MD Logistics Radio Kit (Midland) 65 3.64 $17,572.75

4244K2 Logistics Radio Kit (King KNG2) 65 3.64 $21,380.45

4244X2 Logistics Radio Kit (Motorola) 75 3.64 $21,272.93

004248 Logistics Repeater 80 3.64 $10,773.88

004281 Crossband Link Kit 97 3.64 $18,326.27

004300 Ground VHF Base Station Kit 80 3.64 $ 5,516.05

004312 Command Repeater Kit 95 3.64 $18,761.17

004320 COML Kit 30 1.63 $ 5,939.54

4330MD Remote Kit (Midland Radios) 95 3.64 $ 3,619.70

4330EX Remote Expansion Kit 45 3.64 $ 1,116.00

4330KP Remote Kit (KNG2 Radios) 95 3.64 $ 4,260.04

004370 Aircraft Link Kit 69 3.64 $14,721.16

4381K2 Cmd/Tac Radio Kit (King KNG2) 75 3.64 $23,979.49

4381KD Cmd/Tac Radio Kit (King) 75 3.64 $14,307.91

004410 Public Address Kit 22 3.64 $ 2,071.96

Box 1 41 6.52 $ 710.45

Box 2 41 2.56 $ 474.76

004499 Air Attack Kit 35 3.64 $30,793.64

004604 Air Attack Training Kit 55 4.44 $ 1,312.24

Box 1 51 3.64 $ 8,038.13

Box 2 35 3.64 $21,016.31

004670 Satellite Phone Kit (Motorola) 4.8 0.32 $ 2,138.18

004305 Antenna Masts (1 Set) 15 1 $ 48.60

Airbase Kit

004420

004660

KIT

NATIONAL INCIDENT RADIO SUPPORT CACHE EQUIPMENT WEIGHTS 

AND KIT COSTS

March 9, 2021

MAFFS Printer Kit
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 41344 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOSE JAIMES

- CHAVEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4 : 11

- CR

- 192

- 1

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Jaimes

- Chavez
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jaimes

- Chavez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 7, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-41344 Document: 00512434012 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/07/2013No. 12

- 41344

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-41344 Document: 00512434012 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/07/2013
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned executive officers of the registrant hereby certify that
this Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained herein fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the registrant.

                                       Parkvale Financial Corporation


Dated: April 26, 2007                  By: /s/ Robert J. McCarthy, Jr.
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert J. McCarthy, Jr.
                                           Director, President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer


Dated: April 26, 2007                  By: /s/ Timothy G. Rubritz
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Timothy G. Rubritz
                                           Vice President-Treasurer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer


                                       23
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cornelius Scott, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 579]

—Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obus, J.), rendered July 20, 2011, as amended July 25, 2011, resentencing defendant, as a second felony offender, to a term of 14 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful *{see People v Lingle,*16 NY3d 621 [2011]).

Concur— Andrias, J.P, Saxe, DeGrasse, Richter and Gische, JJ.
blm_fa_gbk@blm.gov 

mailto:blm_fa_gbk@blm.gov

    - Header: Great Basin Area Incident Support Cache (GBK)Bureau of Land ManagementNational Interagency Fire Center3833 S. Development AvenueBoise, Idaho 83705
    - Email Address: Email Address: 
    - General Information: SURVEY INFORMATION
    - Contact Information: CUSTOMER CONTACT INFORMATION  (NOT REQUIRED)
    - Name_1: 
    - Email Address_1: 
    - Cell Phone Number_1: 
    - Header_1: Customer Satisfaction Survey
    - Position Information: GBK CONTACT INFORMATION
    - Question 2: 1.  Did GBK fill your order to your satisfaction?
    - Question 3: 2.  Did GBK notify you of any change(s) to your order and the reason for the change(s)?
    - Question 4: 3.  Did GBK's transportation services meet your support requirements?
    - Question 7: 7.  Is there anything you would like to see GBK do differently that would make you more effective at your job?
    - Question 1 Answer: [ ]
    - Question 2 Answer: [ ]
    - Question 3 Answer: [ ]
    - Question 4 Answer: [ ]
    - Question 6 Answer: [ ]
    - Question 8 Answer: [ ]
    - Question 6: 5.  Was GBK able to answer your question(s), if any?
    - Question 9: 8.  Please list any other comments here:
    - Question 9 Answer: 
    - Name: Name: 
    - Title: Title:
    - Title Answer: 
    - Question 1: 4.  Did GBK respond to your request in a timely manner?
    - Phone Number: Phone Number:
    - Question 8: 6.  Overall, how would you describe the service you received from GBK.
    - Question 7 Answer: 
    - Question 4 No: If no, please provide a brief explanantion:
    - Question 4 No Answer: 
    - Question 3 No: If no, please provide a brief explanantion:
    - Question 3 No Answer: 
    - Question 2 No: If no, please provide a brief explanantion:
    - Question 6 No: If no, please provide a brief explanantion:
    - Question 6 No Answer: 
    - Question 1 No: If no, please provide a brief explanantion:
    - Question 2 No Answer: 
    - Question 1 No Answer: 
    - Print Button: 
    - Email: 
    - GBK POC's 1: GBK Asst Cache Manger: 208-387-5124
    - GBK POC's 2: GBK Returns, Small Engine Equipment and CDSP Supervisor: 208-387-5341
    - GBK POC's 3: GBK Shipping, Receiving and Transportation Supervisor: 208-387-5716
    - GBK POC's: GBK Cache Manger: 208-387-5547
    - GBK POC's5: GBK Customer Survey Email Address:
    - GBK POC's4: GBK General Information and Ordering: 208-387-5104
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 203 (Thursday, October 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 54566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 16, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Stockmens Financial Corporation, Rapid City, South Dakota; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Valentine Bancorporation, 
and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First National Bank of 
Valentine, both of Valentine, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 19, 
2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-25448 Filed 10-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

In connection with this Annual
Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Zach L. Wasson, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |     |  |                                                     
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 29, 2008 |  | by: |  | /s/ Zach L. Wasson                                  
|                         |  |     |  | Zach L. Wasson                                      
|                         |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                         |  |     |  | Sterling Bancshares, Inc.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.128
                                   DEMAND NOTE

$250,000.00                                                New York, New York
                                                           February 1, 1999

        FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wilshire Technologies, Inc. a
California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Borrower"), hereby
unconditionally PROMISES TO PAY to the order to TRILON DOMINION PARTNERS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company ("Lender"), at 245 Park Avenue, 28th Floor,
New York, NY 10167, or at such other place as the holder of this Demand Note may
designate from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of
America and in immediately available funds, the principal amount of Two Hundred
Fifty Thousand and 00/100, DOLLARS ($250,000.00), together with interest on the
unpaid principal amount of this Demand Note outstanding from time to time from
the date hereof, at a rate per annum equal to the Prime rate of interest of 8.5%
plus 3.0%, or the highest rate permitted by law, whichever shall be less.

        The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be
payable on demand. Interest thereon shall be paid when principal is paid from
the date hereof until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest
rate as specified above. Following failure to pay on demand, Borrower agrees to
pay interest on any overdue payment of principal at a rate per annum equal to
the stated interest rate plus 5%, or the highest rate permitted by law,
whichever shall be less. All interest calculations shall be computed on the
basis of a 360 day year.

        Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and protest are
hereby waived by Borrower.

        Borrower shall have no right to make any off-set against or deduct from
any payment due under this Demand Note.

        Principal and interest may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

        This Demand Note may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change is
sought.

        All covenants of Borrower in this Demand Note and all rights of the
holder under this Demand Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and
assigns, and all such covenants and rights shall inure to the benefit of the
holder of this Demand Note and its successors and assigns.

        This Demand Note has been delivered and accepted at New York, New York
and shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of New York.

                                                Wilshire Technologies, Inc.

                                                By:   /s/ John Van Egmond 
                                                     --------------------------
                                                Name: John Van Egmond
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JEFFREY ZIMMERLY,

Appellant,

v.

DIANNE STANISLAWSCYK, AS 

EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF 

JOAN HITCHCOCK,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00178-CV

Appeal from the

Probate Court No. 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#2011-01120P )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that the Appellant’s brief has not been filed, we 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

On October 21, 2015, the Clerk notified Appellant that his brief was past due and no 

motion for extension of time had been filed. The letter advised Appellant that the Court intended 

to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellant responded within ten days and 

showed grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1). Neither the brief nor a 

motion for extension of time in which to file the brief has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss 
- 2 -

the appeal for want of prosecution.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

November 13, 2015

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
AMENDMENT NO


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO




ASSET PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT 




DATED JUNE 14, 2007







THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 to Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement is made and entered into this 30th day of November, 2007, by and among GLOBAL CASINOS, INC. a Utah corporation ("Global"); and DOC HOLLIDAY CASINO, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“Doc Holliday”).




WITNESETH:




WHEREAS, the parties executed and delivered a certain Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of June 14, 2007, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated September 28, 2007 (the “Agreement”); and




WHEREAS, the parties desire to modify and amend certain provisions of the Agreement in the particulars herein below set forth.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained the parties agree as follows:




1.

Section 9.1(b) of the Agreement is further amended in its entirety to provide the following:




“9.1(b)   By either Buyer or Seller, if for any reason the parties have failed to close the transactions contemplated by this Agreement on or before January 31, 2008, provided that the party seeking to terminate is not in material default hereunder.




2.

This Amendment may not be construed to amend the Agreement in any way except as expressly set forth herein.  The execution and delivery of this Amendment does not constitute and this Amendment may not be construed to constitute a waiver by any party of:




a.

Any breach of the Agreement by any party, whether or not such breach is now existing or currently known or unknown to the non-breaching party or parties; or




b.

Any right or remedy arising from or available to a party by reason of a breach of the  Agreement by any other party or parties.




3.

The parties hereby confirm that the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is in full force and effect.  In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this Amendment and the provisions of the Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall control.




4.

Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.




















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed the Agreement the date and year first above written.




GLOBAL CASINOS, INC.

a Utah corporation  










/s/ Clifford L. Neuman__________

Name:  Clifford L. Neuman

Title:  President




DOC HOLLIDAY CASINO, LLC.,

a Colorado limited liability corporation  







/s/ Fedele V. Scutti _____________

Name: Fedele V. Scutti

Title:  Member















2
<PAGE>

                                                              EXHIBIT 10.21(F)

                              SIXTH AMENDMENT TO
                               HFS INCORPORATED
                  AMENDED AND RESTATED 1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN

                             AMENDED AND RESTATED
                              AS OF JUNE 14, 1994

    FURTHER AMENDED AS OF MAY 5, 1995, JANUARY 22, 1996, MAY 20, 1996, JULY
                       24, 1996 AND SEPTEMBER 24, 1996

The HFS Incorporated Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan (the
"Restated Plan") is hereby further amended as follows:

         1.       The proviso to subsection 3(b)(iv) of the Restated Plan is
                  hereby deleted.

         2.       The last sentence of the introductory paragraph of Section 7
                  (as added pursuant to First Amendment to the Restated Plan)
                  is hereby deleted.

         3.       Section 7(a) of the Restated Plan is hereby amended and
                  restated in its entirety to read as follows:

                   "General. Non-Employee Directors shall receive Nonqualified
         Stock Options under the Plan. The exercise price per share of Stock
         purchasable under Options granted to Non-Employee Directors shall be
         the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant. An Option
         granted to a Non-Employee Director shall become FULLY vested and
         exercisable upon a Change-of-Control Transaction as defined in
         Section 2(f) hereof. The Board or the Committee shall have the
         authority, in its sole discretion, to accelerate the exercisability
         of any Option or portion thereof granted to a Non-Employee Director.

         4.       Ratification. Except as expressly set forth in this Sixth
                  Amendment to the Restated Plan, the Restated Plan is hereby
                  ratified and confirmed without modification.

         5.       Effective Date. The effective date of this Sixth Amendment
                  to the Restated Plan shall be September 24, 1996.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Emile Loria, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Epimmune Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Dated: June 22, 2005

                                          /s/ DR. EMILE LORIA
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Dr. Emile Loria
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Stonecreek Sewer Ass’n v. Gary D. Morgan Developer, Inc.

Case below: 179 N.C. App. 721

No. 589P06

Defs’ (Moore) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-311)

Denied 01/25/07
#### Margaret (Coate) ELEY, Plaintiff, v. Mc-LAIN TRUCKING, Inc., and Clyde E. Rupert, Defendants.

Civil Action No. 5926.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, W. D.

Dec. 24, 1948.

Myers & Myers and Robert D. Touvelle, all of Celina, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Effler, Eastman, Stichter & Smith, of Toledo, Ohio, and Marchal & Marchal, of Greenville, Ohio, for defendants.

For opinion, see Stauffer v. McLain Trucking, Inc., 8 F.R.D. 478.