alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.3****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Jay T. Caldwell, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Redhook Ale Brewery, Incorporated; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsa d procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions); (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:March 26, 2008                BY: /s/ Jay T. Caldwell                  Jay T. Caldwell           *Chief Financial Officer*
June 22, 1998



Trendview Management Inc.
591 Camino de la Reina
Suite 316
San Deigo, California 93208-3105

Attention:  Mr. Clark Smith

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewal
                  F-1000 Futures Fund L.P., Series IX

Dear Mr. Smith:

We are  writing  with  respect  to  your  management  agreement  concerning  the
commodity pool to which reference is made above (the "Management Agreement"). We
would like to extend the term of the Management  Agreement through June 30, 1999
and make the attached  modification on Rider 1. Per our recent correspondence to
you, the current allocation is 50% to the Diversified  trading system and 50% to
the Currency trading system.  All other  provisions of the Management  Agreement
will remain unchanged.

Please indicate your agreement to and acceptance of this modification by signing
one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel Dantuono
at the address above or fax to 212-723-8985.  If you have any questions I can be
reached at 212-723-5416.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT INC.



By:
         Daniel A. Dantuono
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Director & Treasurer

AGREED AND ACCEPTED

TRENDVIEW MANAGEMENT INC.

By:

Print Name:

DAD/sr
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2735 

To prohibit additional requirements for the control of Vibrio vulnificus 

applicable to the post-harvest processing of oysters. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2009 

Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. VITTER, and Mr. 

INHOFE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prohibit additional requirements for the control of Vibrio 

vulnificus applicable to the post-harvest processing of oysters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gulf Oyster Protection 

5 Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST ADDITIONAL REQUIRE7 MENTS APPLICABLE TO POST-HARVEST 

8 PROCESSING OF OYSTERS. 

9 No Federal funds may be used to establish or imple10 ment under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2735 IS

1 (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) or other authority any require2 ment for the control of Vibrio vulnificus applicable to the 

3 post-harvest processing of oysters that is in addition to 

4 Federal requirements applicable to such processing as of 

5 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Kathleen K., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Steven K., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Rachel K, a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Steven K., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Submitted July 19, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

Motion for poor person relief granted.
Exhibit 8.1
 List of Subsidiaries of KT Corporation
(As of December 31, 2008)
 Jurisdiction ofName
    
    IncorporationKT Powertel Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaKT Networks Corporation
    
    KoreaKT Linkus Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaKT Hitel Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaKT Submarine Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaKT Freetel Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaKT Commerce Inc.
    
    KoreaKTF Technologies Inc.
    
    KoreaKT Internal Venture Fund No.2
    
    KoreaKTF M Hows Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaKT Rental Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaSidus FNH Corporation
    
    KoreaSidus FNH Benex Cinema Investment Fund
    
    KoreaKT Capital Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaTelecop Service Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaOlive Nine Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaKTF M&S Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaKT FDS Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaKTF Music Corporation (formerly, Bluecord Technology Co., Ltd.)
    
    KoreaDoremi Media Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaNasmedia, Inc.
    
    KoreaSofnics, Inc.
    
    KoreaJungBoPremiumEdu Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaKT New Business Fund No. 1
    
    KoreaKT DataSystems Co., Ltd.
    
    KoreaKorea Telecom America, Inc.
    
    AmericaNew Telephone Company, Inc.
    
    RussiaKorea Telecom Japan Co., Ltd.
    
    JapanKorea Telecom China Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaPT. KTF Indonesia
    
    IndonesiaSuper iMax
    
    UzbekistanEast Telecom
    
    UzbekistanKTSC Investment Management B.V.
    
    Netherlands
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF RIMAGE CORPORATION

|                                           |  |            |                               |        |              
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---------- | ----------------------------- | ------ | -------------
|Name                                       |  |            | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |        | Percent
Owned
|                                           |  |            |                               |        |              
|                                          
|Rimage
 Europe GmbH                        |  | Germany    |                               | 100.0%
|                                          
|Rimage Japan
 Co., Ltd.                    |  | Japan      |                               | 100.0%
|                                          
|Cedar
 Technologies, Inc.                  |  | Minnesota  |                               | 100.0%
|                                          
|Media
 Systems Technology, Inc. (Inactive) |  | California |                               | 86.8% 

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1820. JENNIFER SCOTT v. THE COMMUNITIES AT PRINCETON

LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

This case was docketed by this court on July 12, 2024, and Appellant’s brief

and enumeration of errors were due August 1, 2024. As of the date of this order,

Appellant still has not filed a brief and enumeration of errors and has not requested

an extension of time in which to do so. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby

DISMISSED as abandoned pursuant to Court of Appeals Rules 13 and 23.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 15, 2024

08/15/2024
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WALTER RILEY
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 334

[ July 15, 2021 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Kathleen McHugh , Judge; L.T. Case No. 18

- 001280MM10A, 18

- 000037AC10A

.

Gordon Weekes, Public Defender, and James K. Rubin, Assistant Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

F ORST

, K LINGENSMITH

, and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 8.1



List of subsidiaries of KT Corporation

(As of December 31, 2003)



|                                |  |                              
|------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                            |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|KT Powertel Co., Ltd.           |  | Korea                        
|KT Solutions Corporation        |  | Korea                        
|KT Linkus Co., Ltd.             |  | Korea                        
|KT Hitel Co., Ltd.              |  | Korea                        
|Korea Telecom America, Inc.     |  | U.S.A.                       
|Korea Telecom Philippines, Inc. |  | Philippines                  
|KT Submarine Co., Ltd.          |  | Korea                        
|KT Freetel Co., Ltd.            |  | Korea                        
|New Telephone Company Inc.      |  | Russia                       
|Korea Telecom Japan Co., Ltd.   |  | Japan                        
|KTF Technologies Inc.           |  | Korea                        
|KT Commerce Inc.                |  | Korea                        
|KT Rental Corp.                 |  | Korea                        
|KT China Co., Ltd.              |  | China
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 904 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1560 Union Valley Road in West Milford, 

New Jersey, as the ‘‘Brian P. Parrello Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 904 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. BRIAN P. PARRELLO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1560 Union Valley Road in West 

4 Milford, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Brian P. Parrello Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Brian P. Parrello Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate June 29, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and Publications Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, July 1, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marianne Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and Publications Issue Committee will be held Wednesday, July 1, 2009, at Noon, Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Marianne Ayala. For more information please contact Ms. Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: May 27, 2009. 

Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-12732 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2697 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2697

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acid Blue 80.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Whitehouse) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acid Blue 80.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACID BLUE 80.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.49 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Acid Blue 80) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-18945)pertaining to the 1992 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, and the Amended and Restated DirectorsStock Option Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-90524) pertaining to the 2002Stock Option Plan of Redhook Ale Brewery, Incorporated of our report dated March 23, 2006 withrespect to the financial statements of Redhook Ale Brewery, Incorporated included in the AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.MOSS ADAMS LLPSeattle, Washington
#### PRICE v. MUTH BROS., Inc.

Civil Action No. 857.

District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

June 18, 1947.

Pickrel, Schaeffer & Ebeling, of Dayton, Ohio (J. Paul Brenton, of Dayton, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Matthews & Altick, of Dayton, Ohio (Hugh H. Altick, of Dayton, Ohio, of counsel), for defendant.

*425NEVIN, District Judge.

This cause is now before the court on a motion heretofore, to-wit, on May 20, 1947, filed by and on behalf of defendant. In its motion defendant moves the court for an order requiring plaintiff to file and serve a more definite statement of his claim in the certain respects and particulars as in the motion set forth. The particulars referred to are set forth in the motion in four paragraphs, numbered 1 to 4, inclusive.

The court is of the opinion that the motion is not well taken and that it should be overruled as to each of said paragraphs respectively and in its entirety.

The motion falls within the decision of this Court made on January 3, 1939, in Hardin v. Interstate Motors Freight System, D.C., 26 F.Supp. 97.

The complaint in the instant case follows in substance, if not literally, Form 9, appended to the Rules of Civil Procedure, Title 28 U.S.C.A. following Section 723c. While the forms appended to the Rules of Civil Procedure are intended for illustration purposes only, it is the view of the court that where they are in a proper case (as here) followed in substance, the allegations of the complaint are sufficiently definite.

Since contributory negligence is an affirmative defense under the Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 8(c), the complaint need contain no allegation of due care upon the part of plaintiff. One of the purposes of the Rules of Civil Procedure is to simplify pleadings in the Federal Courts.

As pointed out by counsel for plaintiff in their memorandum, defendant can probably secure the information which it is seeking either by way of deposition and discovery or possibly by means of a Bill of Particulars, as provided in Rule 12(e) of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

As to these latter suggestions, the Court is making no ruling at this time. This present ruling is confined to the motion now before the Court. This motion the Court finds, is not well taken and should be, and it is, overruled.

Counsel may prepare and submit an order accordingly.
[946 NE2d 172, 921 NYS2d 184]

#### 61 West 62 Owners Corp., Respondent, v CGM EMP LLC et al., Appellants, and West 63 Empire Associates LLC, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Decided March 31, 2011

*823APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf, LLP,*New York City *(Bruce F. Bronster*and *Gregory J. Kerr*of counsel), for appellants.

*Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP,*New York City *(Steven D. Sladkus*and *Christopher Cobb*of counsel), for 61 West 62 Owners Corp., respondent.

*Cozen O’Connor,*New York City *(Michael C. Schmidt*and *Menachem J. Kastner*of counsel), for West 63 Empire Associates LLC, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by remitting to the Appellate Division for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed. The certified question should be answered in the negative.

The failure of authorities to issue a violation of the New York City Noise Control Code (see Administrative Code of City of NY § 24-201 *et seq.),*by itself, does not preclude plaintiff from establishing that it is likely to succeed on the merits. However, it cannot be said on this record that the imposition of a provisional remedy is required as a matter of law. Therefore, the case should be remitted to the Appellate Division for the exercise of its discretion.

We have considered appellants’ other contention, and determine that it lacks merit.*

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

*824On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order modified, etc.

*

 Respondent West 63 Empire Associates LLC is not eligible for affirmative relief in this appeal and we express no view on the arguments it has made in that regard (see *Matter of Visiting Nurse Serv. of N.Y. Home Care v New York State Dept. of Health,*5 NY3d 499, 507 [2005]).
**Exhibit 31.2****Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification**I, Gino Chouinard, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HearUSA, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis l report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: May 15, 2007   /s/ Gino Chouinard Gino Chouinard    Chief Financial Officer