alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 118 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 118

Expressing the sense of the Congress that, as a matter of economic and 
  national security, the United States Government should protect and 
                    support United States currency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2006

  Mr. Coburn submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that, as a matter of economic and 
  national security, the United States Government should protect and 
                    support United States currency.

Whereas the United States dollar, as the world's reserve currency, is one of our 
        country's greatest assets;
Whereas the strength and integrity of the United States dollar provides the 
        United States with economic stability and national security;
Whereas any threat or change to the status of the dollar as a world reserve 
        currency would be costly to the United States Treasury and could cause 
        national economic instability;
Whereas international counterfeiting of the dollar is on the rise and currency 
        counterfeiting has reportedly been used to finance rogue governments and 
        terrorism;
Whereas on January 26, 2006, President Bush made a strong commitment to protect 
        the currency of the United States from counterfeiting by the North 
        Korean regime or any other adversarial regime or organization; and
Whereas every dollar issued by the United States Government is meant to be 
        representative of the strength and solidarity of this great nation: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that, as a matter of economic and 
national security, the United States Government should provide the 
currency of the United States with the protection and support necessary 
to defend its integrity throughout the world, effectively deter 
counterfeiting, and preserve the status of the dollar as the world's 
reserve currency.
                                 <all>
```
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUL 24 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
RUSSEL LEE SINGLETARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VERN LUKEHART, Deputy Marshal, U.S. Marshal Service, Des Moines, Iowa; BILL GRAS, Warden CCA, Lansing Kansas; CARROL ST. CLAIR, RN, CCA Lansing, Kansas, individually and in her official capacity; DR. BOWLIN, contract physician of CCA, Lansing, Kansas. Defendants - Appellees.. No. 98-3137 (D.C. No. 97-CV-3102-GTV) (KANSAS)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO , KELLY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

Russel Lee Singletary appeals the dismissal of his pro se civil rights action seeking redress under the Eighth Amendment. In the district court he asserted he was subjected to cruel and unusual punishment because of medical treatment for an injury he received- 2 -

while confined. After examining the briefs and the record, we have determined unanimously that oral argument will not materially assist the determination of this appeal. The case is therefore submitted on the briefs. **See** Fed. R. App. P. (34)(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. Although the district court dismissed Mr. Singletary’s complaint because he failed to show he had been treated with deliberate indifference, the court nonetheless granted him leave to appeal without prepayment of fees, assessing partial payment over time. We remind Mr. Singletary that regardless of the outcome of the appeal, he is obliged to pay the entire fee in compliance with the order of the district court. Our review leads us to the conclusion the district court did not err. Given the most liberal construction of the allegations made by Mr. Singletary, his claims would rise only to the level of simple negligence. Those claims, therefore, cannot constitute a valid Eighth Amendment complaint. For the reasons given in its order of dismissal, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2603 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2603

To suspend temporarily the duty on screw-on bottle caps and shaker caps 
                  with chromium or gold plated finish.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on screw-on bottle caps and shaker caps 
                  with chromium or gold plated finish.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SCREW-ON BOTTLE CAPS AND SHAKER CAPS WITH CHROMIUM OR GOLD 
              PLATED FINISH.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Screw-on bottle     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        caps and shaker                                                    31/2011.......
                        caps with
                        chromium or gold
                        plated finish
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8309.90.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 15.5

June 29, 2010

Securities and Exchange
Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549-7561

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have read the information required by Item 16 F of Form 20-F dated June 29, 2010 of KT Corporation, and have the following
comments:

1. We agree with the statements made in the paragraphs two and four in the section Change in Registrants Certifying
Accountant on pages 108 and 109.

2. We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained
therein.



|                      
|----------------------
|Yours sincerely,      
|                      
|/s/ DELOITTE ANJIN LLC
|Deloitte Anjin LLC
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Lesley Wells, Senior District Judge for the Northern **

District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ANGEL DANILO VASQUEZSALGUERO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-10377

D.C. No. 2:07-CR-01204-SRB-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 11, 2011

San Francisco, California

Before: FERNANDEZ and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and WELLS, Senior

District Judge.** 

Angel Danilo Vasquez-Salguero appeals the district court's application of a

sixteen-level enhancement to his sentence for illegal reentry after deportation. The

FILED

APR 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

district court concluded, without analysis, that Vasquez-Salguero’s prior burglary

conviction under Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-1507 qualified as a crime of

violence. 

We have previously held that Arizona burglary does not categorically match

the generic federal definition. See United States v. Bonat, 106 F.3d 1472, 1475-76

(9th Cir. 1997). Therefore, whether the appellant’s prior conviction qualifies as a

crime of violence depends upon application of the modified categorical approach

described in Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 602, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109

L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). The district court’s failure to conduct this analysis was plain

error. Therefore, we reverse and remand for resentencing on an open record

pursuant to United States v. Matthews, 278 F.3d 880, 889 (9th Cir. 2002)(en banc).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.02
 
  a)
    
    The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2007
filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; andb)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By
    /s/ Peter L. BuzyPeter L. BuzyChief Financial Officer
exhibit4-3.htm

EXHIBIT 4.3

    CERTIFICATE
      OF TRUST

     

    OF

     

    TEMECULA
      VALLEY STATUTORY TRUST VI

     

    


     

    This
      Certificate of Trust of Temecula Valley Statutory Trust VI (the “Trust”) is
      being duly executed and filed on behalf of the Trust by the undersigned, as
      trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act
      (12
Del. C. §3801 etseq.) (the “Act”).

     

    1.           Name.
      The name of the statutory trust formed by this Certificate of Trust is: Temecula
      Valley Statutory Trust VI.

     

    2.           Delaware
      Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust with its
      principal place of business in the State of Delaware are Wilmington Trust
      Company, Rodney Square North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware
      19890-0001, Attention: Corporate Capital Markets.

     

    3.           Effective
      Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon its filing with the
      Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Certificate of Trust
      in
      accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.

     

    Wilmington
      Trust Company, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Property
      Trustee

    


    By:           /s/
      PATRICIA A. EVANS

    Name:                      Patricia
      A. Evans

    Title:                      Vice
      President

    


    Wilmington
      Trust Company, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Delaware
      Trustee

    


    By:           /s/
      PATRICIA A. EVANS

    Name:                      Patricia
      A. Evans

    Title:                      Vice
      President
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26378-26379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12709]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy

Notice of Record of Decision for Laurelwood Housing Area Access, 
Naval Weapons Station Earle, Colts Neck, NJ

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Record of Decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (Navy), after carefully weighing 
the operational and environmental

[[Page 26379]]

consequences of the proposed action, announces its decision to provide 
unimpeded access to the Laurelwood housing area located at Naval 
Weapons Station (NWS) Earle, Colts Neck, New Jersey, as required by its 
agreement with the developer of the Laurelwood housing area. Unimpeded 
access will be accomplished through implementing Alternative Alignment 
4, described in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) as the 
preferred alternative, which will access NWS Earle via a new entrance 
south of the main gate along New Jersey Route 34 and terminate at the 
Laurelwood housing area. This will require the issuance of an easement 
to the Laurelwood developer over the path of the access road, 
construction of the access road, construction of a bridge over 
Esperance Road, and installation of perimeter fencing.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Record of Decision (ROD) has been 
distributed to all persons who requested a copy of the FEIS. The 
complete text of the ROD is available on the public Web site: http://www.laurelwoodeis.com along with the complete FEIS and accompanying 
documentation. Single copies of the ROD will be made available upon 
request by contacting Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic, 
Attn: Laurelwood Housing Area EIS Project Manager, Code EV-21 KGB, 6506 
Hampton Boulevard, Lafayette River Annex Building A, Norfolk, Virginia 
23508.

    Dated: May 26, 2009.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-12709 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
```
11/30/07 Great Plains Note  (K0156076.DOC;1)


Exhibit 10.1



COGNOVIT PROMISSORY NOTE OF

JOHN D. OIL AND GAS COMPANY, INC.



$_120,000.00                            

November 30, 2007 

                                                                    

For value received, the undersigned, promises to pay to the order of GREAT PLAINS EXPLORATION, LLC the principal sum of One Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars ($120,000.00) with interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 1.75% per annum.  Payment of the principal and accrued interest is due and payable upon DEMAND. 

The indebtedness evidenced hereby may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without penalty or notice.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary which may be provided for, or implied by, the other terms of this Note, the entire principal balance, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and any other charges, advances and fees, if any, outstanding hereunder, shall be due and payable in full on demand.

The Maker waives demand presentment for payment, protest, notice of protest and of non-payment, and any and all lack of diligence or delays in collection or enforcement of this Note, and expressly consent to any extension of time of payment hereof, or any other indulgence of forbearance, any of which may be made without notice to any party and without in any way affecting the personal liability of any party.

The undersigned authorize any attorney-at-law to appear in any court of record in Lake County, Ohio after the indebtedness evidenced hereby becomes due in accordance with the terms hereof, whether by acceleration or otherwise, and to thereupon waive the issuing and service of process, waive presentment, demand, notice of dishonor, protest and notice of non-payment, and to confess judgment against the undersigned Makers, in favor of the holder hereof for the amount then appearing due together with the costs of this suit, and thereupon to waive all errors and all rights of appeal and stays of execution.


WARNING: BY SIGNING THIS PAPER, YOU GIVE UP YOUR RIGHT TO NOTICE AND COURT TRIAL.  IF YOU DO NOT PAY ON TIME, A COURT JUDGMENT MAY BE TAKEN AGAINST YOU WITHOUT YOUR PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND THE POWERS OF A COURT CAN BE USED TO COLLECT FROM YOU REGARDLESS OF ANY CLAIMS YOU MAY HAVE AGAINST THE CREDITOR WHETHER FOR RETURNED GOODS, FAULTY GOODS, FAILURE ON HIS PART TO COMPLY WITH THE AGREEMENT, OR ANY OTHER CAUSE.


 JOHN D. OIL AND GAS COMPANY, INC.

By:/s/ Gregory J. Osborne

Gregory J. Osborne, President and Chief Operating Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2683 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2683

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Pyrasulfotole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Pyrasulfotole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PYRASULFOTOLE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       5-Hydroxy-1,3-      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          dimethylpyrazol-4-                                                 31/2011.......
                          yl 2-mesyl-4-
                          (trifluoromethyl)
                          phenyl ketone
                          (Pyrasulfotole)
                          (CAS No. 365400-
                          11-9) (provided
                          for in subheading
                          2933.19.23)  ....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Robert Wooley, Appellant, v New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

Submitted August 16, 2010;

decided September 21, 2010

Motion for reargument denied *[see*15 NY3d 275 (2010)].
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IDM Pharma, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: May 15, 2006       /s/ Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne Dr. Jean-Loup Romet-Lemonne    Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Smith, Appellant.

Submitted January 18, 2011;

decided February 10, 2011

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 11 Park Place, Suite 1601, New York, NY 10007 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         400,358
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  604,955
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,412,194
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,729,445
<PP&E>                                       1,932,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,974,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,030,383
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,695,450
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,974,652
<SALES>                                      1,508,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,508,113
<CGS>                                        1,100,560
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,100,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (35,200)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (98,646)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (98,646)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (98,646)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Watts

Case below: 185 N.C. App.-(21 August 2007)

No. 449P05-2

1. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. 7A-31 (COA04-874-2)

2. Defs Alternative PWC to Review Decision of COA

1. Denied 11/08/07

2. Dismissed as Moot 11/08/07

Hudson, J., Recused