alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, July 7, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6095. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, July 7, 2009, at 1 p.m. Pacific time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Dave Coffman. For more information please contact Mr. Coffman at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6095, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                           ( print page 26482)    

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: May 27, 2009. 

Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director,  Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-12741 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Daniel ORIAKHI, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-8224.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 16, 2009.

Decided: May 7, 2009.

Daniel Oriakhi, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, Office of the United States Attorney, Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Oriakhi seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2008) motion. The notice of appeal was received in the district court after expiration of the appeal period. Because Oriakhi is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). The record does not conclusively reveal when Oriakhi gave the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1) and *Houston v. Lack.*The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

*REMANDED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended December
30, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-28-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                         45
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                   982
<INVENTORY>                                    83,725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,258
<PP&E>                                         73,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                 28,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          50,441
<BONDS>                                        35,453
<COMMON>                                       1,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     72,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,734
<SALES>                                        35,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               35,187
<CGS>                                          34,633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  34,633
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,065)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,374)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,374)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.49)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule Contains Summary Financial Information Extracted From the 
consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations for Telos Corporation
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000320121                     
<NAME>                        Telos Corporation
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             387,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0   
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,221,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       752,000 
<INVENTORY>                                      8,649,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,941,000 
<PP&E>                                          38,566,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,535,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,040,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,330,000
<BONDS>                                         40,763,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,820,000
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            78,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (50,594,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,040,000
<SALES>                                         16,699,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,548,000
<CGS>                                           15,881,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,847,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     6,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,803,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,600,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,478,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,122,000) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,122,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        




</TABLE>
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ryan S. McCleery, Chief Financial Officer of Terrace Ventures
  Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
  the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the quarter year ended July 31, 2004, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
        and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           



| | By:    | /s/ Ryan S. McCleery   
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | RYAN S. McCLEERY       
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | September 20, 2004     

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant
  and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant
  under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
  made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
  incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6965

TYRONE WILSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; WARDEN ANTHONY, Lee Correctional Institution; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-03-3657-18AJ-2) Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tyrone Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wilson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2611 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2611

 To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital camera lenses 
                 measuring approximately 55 mm or more.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital camera lenses 
                 measuring approximately 55 mm or more.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIGHTWEIGHT DIGITAL CAMERA LENSES MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 55 
              MM OR MORE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Lenses designed     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        for digital                                                        31/2011.......
                        cameras, the
                        foregoing with a
                        focal length
                        measuring
                        approximately 55
                        mm or more but
                        not over 200 mm
                        and weighing
                        between 329 grams
                        to 339 grams
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        9002.11.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Stefanie A. RODEN; James D. Haburn, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. Bhula DIAH; Linda Knight; Stuart Cohen; Jayant Patel; Prakruti Hospitality, LLC; Terry Neill Grimes, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 09-1088.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 2009.

Decided: May 28, 2009.

*254Stefanie A. Roden; James D. Haburn, Appellants Pro Se. Terry Neill Grimes, Melvin Edward Williams, Grimes *&*Williams, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Ap-pellees.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stefanie A. Roden and James D. Haburn appeal the district court’s order dismissing their numerous federal and state law claims against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. *See Roden v. Diah,*No. 7:07-cv-00252-gec-mfu, 2008 WL 5334309 (W.D.Va. Dec. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 24862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12224]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Brain and Tissue Bank 
Repository.
    Date: June 24, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division Of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680. 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 19, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-12224 Filed 5-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
#### Robert Thomas JENKINS, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 05-5472.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

July 11, 2006.

Robert Thomas Jenkins, Petersburg, VA, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, Appellee.

*9Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed November 3, 2005 be affirmed. The district court correctly determined that appellant’s claims against the federal judges and Justices of the Supreme Court are barred by judicial immunity. *See Mireles v. Waco,*502 U.S. 9, 10, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991); *Stump v. Sparkman,*435 U.S. 349, 98 S.Ct. 1099, 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978). Although appellant continues to protest the rulings against him, this circuit has no authority to review collaterally the decisions of a sister circuit. *See Dynaquest Corp. v. U.S. Postal Service,*242 F.3d 1070, 1075 (D.C.Cir. 2001).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined 

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 00-60327

Summary Calendar

____________________

TRACEY HOLLINS, L.T., a minor by and through Tracey Hollins, 

as next friend; ONITA HOLLINS, L.T., a minor by and through 

Onita Hollins, as next friends,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI; ET AL.,

Defendants,

CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI; WESTWOOD L.P.,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:98-CV-562-WS

--------------------

December 19, 2000

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

The plaintiffs-appellants appeal the district court’s summary

judgment in favor of the City of Jackson and Westwood, L.P. After

examination of the records and briefs, we have determined that

there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the
2

defendants’ motions for summary judgment were properly granted. 

The City of Jackson is not liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for

the misconduct of its employee, Kerry Collins. See Gros v. City of

Grand Prairie, 181 F.3d 613, 615 (5th Cir. 1999). The Mississippi

Tort Claims Act shields the City of Jackson from liability for the

plaintiffs’ state-tort claims. See Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-

5(1)(Supp. 2000). Westwood L.P. did not breach a duty to the

plaintiff under Mississippi law dealing with premises liability.

See Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc., 163 F.3d 265, 271

(5th Cir. 1998). Nor is Westwood L.P. vicariously liable for

Collins’s conduct. See Tichenor v. Roman Catholic Church of New

Orleans, 32 F.3d 953, 959 (5th Cir. 1994). Finally, Westwood L.P.

cannot be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Wong v.

Stripling, 881 F.2d 200, 202 (5th Cir. 1989); Williams v. Luna, 909

F.2d 121, 123 (5th Cir. 1990). The district court’s grant of

summary judgment is AFFIRMED.
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IROBOT CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

SHARKNINJA OPERATING LLC, SHARKNINJA

MANAGEMENT LLC, SHARKNINJA SALES

COMPANY,

Appellees

______________________

2022

- 1233

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020

-

00733

.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App.

P. 42 (b). Case: 22-1233 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 05/05/2022I R OBOT C ORPORATION V

. S HARK N INJA O PERATING LLC 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

May 5, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: May 5, 2022 Case: 22-1233 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 05/05/2022