alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States 

Department of 

Agriculture

Forest 

Service 

Washington Office 14th & Independence SW 

P.O. Box 96090 

Washington, DC 20090-6090

 Caring for the Land and Serving People Printed on Recycled Paper 

File Code: 6130/5100 Date: June 15, 2004 

Route To: (5100), (6130) 

Subject: Implementation of the Interagency Fire Program Management Standard 

To: Regional Foresters, Station Directors, Area Director, IITF Director, and WO Staff 

 

 

I am pleased to announce the culmination of a lengthy effort between the Department of the 

Interior and the Department of Agriculture to establish uniform fire management qualification 

standards to improve firefighter safety and increase professionalism in fire management 

programs. 

The qualification standards are generally referred to as the IFPM Standard. Among the 

components of the IFPM Standard is the Office of Personnel Management-approved 

Supplemental Qualification Standard for GS-0401 Fire Management Specialist positions which 

was issued in September of 2002. Please see the attached White Paper for additional information 

about the IFPM Standard. 

This effort began several years ago as a result of wildland fire incident reviews. The death of 14 

wildland firefighters on Storm King Mountain in 1994 was a turning point. These studies 

highlighted the fact that we needed more stringent, uniform qualification standards for 

employees in certain fire management positions to assure firefighter safety. 

We have established October 1, 2004, as the date that we will officially begin implementing the 

IFPM Standard. Prior to October 1, the National Fire and Aviation Executive Board (NFAEB) 

will charter a standing committee composed of fire officials and human resources specialists to 

oversee the implementation process. The initial task of this committee will be to develop and 

distribute an overall implementation plan. Full implementation of that plan will require the 

cooperation of fire program managers, supervisors, affected employees, and human resources 

specialists at all levels in both the Forest Service and the Department of Interior Bureaus. With 

that type of proactive transition effort, we expect no adverse impact on any affected employees. 

The standing committee will also establish an effective communications plan, including a 

dedicated web site, so that everyone can stay abreast of our implementation progress. 

In the interim and thereafter, please contact your Servicing Human Resources Office who can 

seek direction from the Washington Office until such time as direction is finalized. Region and 

Station Employment Officers may direct their questions to Joy Thomas at 703-605-0861 or email 

at jrthomas@fs.fed.us. 

/s/ Dale N. Bosworth 

DALE N. BOSWORTH 

Chief 
cc: Joel Holtrop, John Lopez, Joy R Thomas, Billy Terry
Exhibit 99.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Edward J. Quilty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Derma Sciences, Inc., hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the period ending December 31, 2002 of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the "Form 10-KSB")
upon my best knowledge and belief fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences,
Inc.



Dated:  March 31, 2003          /s/ Edward J. Quilty
                                -----------------------------------------------
                                Edward J. Quilty
                                Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                                (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from (A)
Interim  Consolidated  Balance  Sheets,  Statements  of  Operations,  Change  in
Stockholders Equity and Cash Flows and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such (B)  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended  September
30, 1996)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0
<PP&E>                                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      9,498
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                  36,493
<OTHER-SE>                                               (45,991)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   0
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               0
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            1301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (1301)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (1301)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (1301)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0
        

</TABLE>
# AMS Mission Codes

# Pilot and Aircraft Endorsements
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-20002

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OCTAVIUS PAUL SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-88-3

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Octavius Paul Smith on appeal has 

filed a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967). Smith has not filed a response.

The “fugitive disentitlement doctrine” is an equitable doctrine that “limits 

a criminal defendant’s access to the judicial system whose authority he 

evades.” Bagwell v. Dretke, 376 F.3d 408, 410-13 (5th Cir. 2004) (internal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 19, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-20002 Document: 00513388497 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2016
No. 15-20002

2

citation omitted). Smith failed to report to begin serving his sentence on 

January 2, 2015, and has not returned to custody since he became a fugitive. 

It is unlikely that Smith will return, under his own volition or otherwise, in 

the foreseeable future. Under the circumstances, dismissal of Smith’s appeal 

is appropriate. Dismissal of the appeal is further supported by enforceability 

concerns, serves an important deterrent function, and “advances an interest in 

efficient, dignified appellate practice.” Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States, 507 

U.S. 234, 240-42 (1993); Bagwell, 376 F.3d at 410-13.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. Counsel’s motion to withdraw 

is DENIED as moot.

 Case: 15-20002 Document: 00513388497 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/19/2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

# Date and Time:

The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on January 8, 2009, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

## Open Session

                    A.                     *Approval of Minutes*

December 11, 2008      ( print page 712)    

                    B.                     *New Business*
    - Auditors' Report on FCA FY 2008/2007 Financial Statements
    - Registration of Loan Originators Under the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008

                    C.                     *Reports*
    - OE Quarterly Report

##                     Closed Session [*] 

    - Update on OE Oversight Activities

Dated: January 5, 2009.

Roland E. Smith,

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

# Footnotes

*.                             Session Closed—Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E9-121 Filed 1-5-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
#### *Wilson against Finney.*

Where A. delfe, - Tered six sheep to *B., on án agreement that, at ttie end óf a year, B. would deliver A. an equal number of fehéep of equal •value, it was held that the property in the sheep was ¿hanged, and that B. was bound to deliver §ix sheep of.equal valué to A* at the expiration " of the year, although part of the sheep had' been taken under an attachment agaicstA.

,. IN ERROR,,on *certiorari*to a- justice’s, court. ' '

Some time in *June,*-1812, the plaintiff in. error, who was-alsé ■plaintiff in the court below, delivered to, the defendant six sheep., in consideration, whereof the defendant promised and undertook-to return and deliver-to the .plaintiff, at the- expiration Of one : year, an equal' number of sheep, of'equal value,, and also-one-/ pound of wool per head lor each sheep. ‘The defendant had neglected to. deliver, the sheep according to his agreement.- It further, appeared that four df the sheep had-been given up. by the.defendant, .as the property of the plaintiff, on an-attachment ■issued against him, in favour of one of his creditors, oh the ere-' ditor indemnifying the defendant. A verdict and' judgment were giyen for the defendant in the court below.

*Per (Juriam.*

*'*This judgment cannot be supported.,: -There is no Colour for-depriving the plaintiff of a recovery-for the value of two sheeps as there is no pretence that more than four ■were taken under the'attachment against him. But the plain til? *359vTas. entitled to recover for the whole number. The property in the sheep, delivered by the plaintiff, was changed, and duly vested -in the defendant. He was under no obligation to return the same. sheep,' but only those of equal value; They were at his .absolute, disposal and risk. - • . . ■

J udgment reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RIBOZYME PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      13,050,678
<SECURITIES>                                 4,543,470
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,281,961
<PP&E>                                       8,050,151
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,639,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,291,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,493,802
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,483
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,292,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,291,570
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,709,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,188,836
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             844,661
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (15,267,580)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (15,267,580)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (15,267,580)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-20546

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RUBEN TORRES CASTILLO, also known as Ruben Torres, also known as

Ruben Zamora, also known as Juan Torres Garcia, also known as Juan Garcia,

also known as Ruben Torres-Castillo, also known as Ruben Dario ZamoraCastillo,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CR-119-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The FederalPublic Defender appointed to represent Ruben Torres Castillo

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Torres Castillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 16, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-20546 Document: 00511573842 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
No. 10-20546

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-20546 Document: 00511573842 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 29 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 29

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, April 28, 2005, Friday, April 29, 2005, Saturday, April 30, 
2005, or Sunday, May 1, 2005, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until Monday, May 9, 2005, at a time to be 
specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate or his designee, after 
consultation with the Minority Leader, shall notify the Members of the 
Senate to reassemble whenever, in his opinion, the public interest 
shall warrant it.

            Passed the Senate April 28, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 29

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 31.1
 Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluations; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Stephen J. HansbroughStephen J. HansbroughChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION****1**     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Timothy P. Walbert, the President and Chief Executive Officer ofIDM Pharma, Inc. (the “Company”), and Robert J. De Vaere, the Senior Vice President, Finance andAdministration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the bestof his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and**2.**The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report andresults of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.Dated: May 9, 2008       /s/ Timothy P. Walbert   /s/ Robert J. De Vaere         Timothy P. Walbert   Robert J. De Vaere  President and Chief Executive Officer   Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration      and Chief Financial Officer   1 This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to whichit relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission andis not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of IDM Pharma, Inc.under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51121

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOEL VALDEZ-ZUNIGA, also known as Joel Zuniga-Valez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CR-936-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Joel ValdezZuniga raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 108.

#### Identification Devices, Inc. *v.*United States.

January 12, 1942.

*James M. Rulong, pro se.*

The motion for leave to file an amended petition for appeal to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is denied.