alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

Section 906 Certification

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2013 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Javier Marín, the Chief Executive Officer, José Antonio Alvarez, the Chief Financial Officer and José Tejón, the
Chief Accounting Officer of Banco Santander, S.A., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Banco Santander, S.A.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29, 2014



/s/ Javier MarínName:

Javier MarínTitle:

Chief Executive Officer/s/ José Antonio AlvarezName:

José Antonio AlvarezTitle:

Chief Financial Officer/s/ José TejónName:

José TejónTitle:

Chief Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of YoCream International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John N.
Hanna, Director, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ John N. Hanna                                     Dated: March 17, 2005
-----------------
John N. Hanna
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
YoCream International, Inc.



This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to YoCream International, Inc. and
will be retained by YoCream International, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Patricia Benjamin, Appellant, v New York City Board/Department of Education, Respondent.

[964 NYS2d 139]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. *678Gische, J.), entered on or about April 4, 2012, denying the petition seeking to vacate and annul the Hearing Officer’s award, dated April 8, 2011, which terminated petitioner’s employment with respondent as a tenured school teacher, and granting respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 75 and confirm the award, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Adequate evidence in the record supported the Hearing Officer’s determination that petitioner was guilty of multiple specifications charging her with failure to follow procedures and carry out normal duties, and incompetent and inefficient service during three school years *(see Motor Veh. Mfrs. Assn. of U.S. v State of New York,*75 NY2d 175, 186 [1990]). The evidence showed that petitioner was either unwilling or unable to implement suggestions and constructive criticism of her ineffective teaching methods. She also continued to blame others and refused to accept any responsibility for her failure to provide a valid educational experience for her students and deliver consistently effective instruction.

Under the circumstances, the penalty of termination does not shock our sense of fairness *(Lackow v Department of Educ. [or “Board”] of City of N.Y.,*51 AD3d 563, 569 [1st Dept 2008]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Acosta, J.E, Moskowitz, Renwick, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
#### Valerie S. GAMBINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ORLEANS PARISH CRIMINAL SHERIFF’S OFFICE; Charles C. Foti, Jr., Sheriff; Diana C. Rudder, Deputy Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff; D. Beverly, Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff’s Office, Civilian Employee, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-30038.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 21, 2006.

Valerie S. Gambino, Kenner, LA, pro se.

L. Joseph Hassinger, Jr, Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr & Smith, New Orleans, LA, John F. Weeks, II, Timothy R. Richardson, Usry, Weeks *&*Matthews, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Valerie S. Gambino appeals pro se from the dismissal of all defendants after a *489bench trial in this civil rights suit. She argues on appeal that her trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance in the prosecution of the suit. This argument is without merit because the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply in a civil context. *Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv.,*785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986).

Gambino also asserts conclusionally that the theory of res ipsa loquitur should apply to her case. This issue is inadequately briefed and not considered. *See Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); Fed. R.App. P. 28(a)(9). This appeal is without arguable merit and is dismissed as frivolous. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *489the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT EARNINGS PER
SHARE)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,187
<SECURITIES>                                     7,436
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   654
<PP&E>                                           1,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                     272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,840
<BONDS>                                            374<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         14
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,005<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,326
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   328
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,478<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (714)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (714)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (714)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
<FN>
<F1>Includes bonds, mortgages and other long-term debt, including capitalized
leases.
<F2>Includes additional paid in capital, other additional capital and retained
earnings, appropriated and unappropriated. (excludes unrealized loss on
securities)
<F3>Per Chief Accountant at SEC, this amount excludes sales and G&A expenses,
includes costs and expenses applicable to sales and revenues, and tangible
costs of goods sold.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         571,208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 571,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,924
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     511,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   571,208
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,924
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (59,924)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (59,924)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (59,924)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Donald W. Jewell, Chief Executive Officer ofSport-Haley, Inc., certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Sport-Haley, Inc.

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)         Designed such internalcontrol over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

 

(c)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and,

 

(d)         Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  April 13,2009

 

 
| /s/ DONALD W.  JEWELL    |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Donald W. Jewell         |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer |   |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003* In connection with the Annual Report of Cronos Global Income Fund XIV (the Registrant) on Form
10-K for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Dennis J. Tietz, the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant, and John Kallas, the Chief
Financial Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., certify, based on their knowledge, that:  (i)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Registrant.March 24, 2005 By
    
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz,President and Chief Executive Officer of Cronos Capital Corp.,General Partner of the Registrant/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas,Chief Financial Officer of Cronos Capital Corp,.General Partner of the Registrant
 A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE
COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.   *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Timmy Lee McALPIN, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-5143.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 16, 2009.

Decided: May 11, 2009.

Ketanji Brown Jackson, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timmy Lee McAlpin seeks to appeal his conviction and sentence. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); *United States v.*Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered judgment on October 17, 2008. McAlpin filed the notice of appeal on November 13, 2008, after the ten-day period expired but within the thirty-day excusable neglect window. Because the notice of appeal was filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to the district court for the court to determine whether McAlpin has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. We defer acting on the Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal until the record is returned to this court.

*REMANDED.*
English Translation of Power of Attorney dated March 31, 2007



 Exhibit 10.10 
 English Translation 
 Power of Attorney 
 Authorizing Person: Zhao Ming 
 ID Card Number: 310109196802203831

 Address: Rm.2505, 2#, 271# Lane, Dong An Road, Shanghai 
 Postal code: 200032 
 Authorized Person: Chen Shuning 
 ID Card Number: 420111196307075534 
 Address: 3F, 8# Building, Zhongguancun Software Park, Beijing 
 Postal code: 100094 
 I, Zhao Ming, a citizen of the People’s Republic
of China, hereby irrevocably authorizes the person (“Authorized Person”) designated by Worksoft Creative Software Technology Ltd. (“Worksoft”) to exercise any and all my rights as a shareholder of Shanghai Megainfo Tech Co., Ltd.
(“Megainfo”) on my behalf within the valid term of this Power of Attorney, including, but not limited to: 
  

	(1)	Represent myself to attend Megainfo’s shareholders’ meeting; 

  

	(2)	Represent myself to exercise the voting powers concerning all the issues needing to be discussed and resolved by shareholders’ meeting, including, but not limited to, selling
or transferring all or part of my equity interest in Megainfo, nominating and electing Megainfo’s directors, general manager and other senior management personnel; 

  

	(3)	Propose an interim shareholders’ meeting; 

  

	(4)	Represent myself to execute any document I have the right to execute as a shareholder of Megainfo; 

  

	(5)	Other voting powers for shareholder as specified in related laws and regulations and Megainfo’s articles of association. 

 The precondition for the said authorization and entrustment is that Authorized Person is a formal employee of Worksoft and agrees to the said authorization and
entrustment. Once Authorized Person no longer serves Worksoft or Worksoft gives a written notice on the change of Authorized Person, I will immediately withdraw the entrustment and authorization granted herein to Authorized Person and will
designate/authorize the other employee as designated by Worksoft to exercise any and all my rights as a shareholder of Megainfo. 
 Authorized Person shall
perform entrustment obligations in accordance with laws and regulations within the scope of authorization in a prudent and diligent manner and indemnify the Authorizing Person from and against all the losses and damages as may arise from such
authorization and entrustment (except those caused due to my intentional act or gross negligence). 
 This Power of Attorney shall become effective as of the
Execution Date and will remain in force during the period when I am a shareholder of Megainfo. 
  

			
	Zhao Ming :	 	 /s/ Zhao Ming

		
		 	March 31, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2609 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2609

  To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on certain acetamiprid, 
          whether or not combined with application adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on certain acetamiprid, 
          whether or not combined with application adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACETAMIPRID, WHETHER OR NOT COMBINED WITH 
              APPLICATION ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.72 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain acetamiprid, whether 
or not combined with application adjuvants) is amended by striking the 
date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131827 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131827 

 COA: 267058 

Oakland CC: 02-186903-FH 

DENNIS BRIAN MALAGA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Optical Molecular Imaging, Inc (the Company) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

(i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 11, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ C. Kirk Peacock
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | C. Kirk Peacock                      
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer