alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
KFS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0581

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SCOTT W. ELLISON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including August 24, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 13 2021

07/13/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0581
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of CNH Holdings  Company,  on
Form  10-QSB/A  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003 as  filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Lisa  Anderson,  Chief  Financial  and  Accounting  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: February 26, 2004

/s/ Lisa Anderson
Lisa Anderson
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 911.

#### Bull Steamship Lines, Inc. *v.*Thompson, Trustee.

March 9, 1942.

*Mr. M. G. Eckhardt, Jr.*for petitioner. *Mr. Harry R. Jones*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
S. Con. Res. 123 Agreed to December 8, 2006.

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and six

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 5946, the Clerk

of the House shall make the following corrections:

(1) In the table of contents, strike the item relating to

section 702 and redesignate the item relating to section 703

as relating to section 702.

(2) In title VII, strike section 702 and redesignate section

703 as section 702.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dakota Mix, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 867]

*1418Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (M. William Boiler, A.J.), rendered January 23, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.31), defendant contends that County Court abused its discretion in denying his request to adjudicate him a youthful offender. We reject that contention. “ ‘The determination . . . whether to grant . . . youthful offender status rests within the sound discretion of the court and depends upon all the attending facts and circumstances of the case’ ” *(People v Dawson,*71 AD3d 1490, 1490 [2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 749 [2010]). Here, the record reflects that the court considered the relevant facts and circumstances in denying defendant’s request. Although the crime was not particularly grave and did not involve violence, the remaining factors to be considered upon the application for youthful offender treatment weighed against such a determination *(cf. People v Shrubsall,*167 AD2d 929, 930 [1990]). Defendant has been involved with probation since he was 12 years old based on orders adjudicating him to be a person in need of supervision and juvenile delinquency adjudications and has been offered many services, but he continued to violate probation and was ultimately placed with the Office of Children and Family Services for 18 months. Defendant did not take responsibility for the instant offense and was uncooperative during his presentence interview. Defendant dropped out of school after the 10th grade and, although he was 19 years old at the time of sentencing, he had no verifiable employment and no plans for future employment in the area. The probation officer recommended against probation and believed that defendant’s prospects for rehabilitation and hope for a future constructive life were poor. We therefore conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request. Present — Smith, J.P, Centra, Fahey, Garni and Whalen, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NARCRISSUS SWANIGAN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

DAVID BAILEY; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-36002

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-05073-EFS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Edward F. Shea, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2013** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Washington state prisoner Narcrissus Swanigan appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that

prison officials retaliated against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

FILED

JAN 02 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Brodheim v. Cry, 584 F.3d 1262, 1267 (9th

Cir. 2009), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Swanigan

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants retaliated

against him for complaining about alleged staff misconduct. See id. at 1269

(setting forth the elements of a First Amendment retaliation claim in the prison

context); Villiarimo v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., 281 F.3d 1054, 1061 (9th Cir. 2002)

(uncorroborated and self-serving testimony does not raise a genuine dispute of

fact).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Swanigan’s motion

for reconsideration because Swanigan failed to establish grounds warranting

reconsideration. See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or., v. ACandS, Inc., 5

F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and factors for

reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)).

We reject Swanigan’s contentions that the court weighed evidence, made

credibility findings and failed to consider evidence Swanigan submitted.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

2 12-36002
appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2008) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

3 12-36002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000821356
<NAME> CNH HOLDINGS COMPANY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    220,000
<COMMON>                                     4,492,984
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,712,984)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Consumer Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting of the Consumer 
Advisory Council

    The Consumer Advisory Council will meet on Thursday, June 18, 2009. 
The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will take place 
at the Federal Reserve Board's offices in Washington, DC, in Dining 
Room E on the Terrace Level of the Martin Building. Anyone planning to 
attend the meeting should, for security purposes, register no later 
than Tuesday, June 16, by completing the form found online at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/secure/forms/cacregistration.cfm.
    Additionally, attendees must present photo identification to enter 
the building.
    The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and is expected to conclude at 
12:30 p.m. The Martin Building is located on C Street, NW., between 
20th and 21st Streets.
    The Council's function is to advise the Board on the exercise of 
the Board's responsibilities under various consumer financial services 
laws and on other matters on which the Board seeks its advice. Time 
permitting, the Council will discuss the following topics:
    <bullet> The Community Reinvestment Act
    Members will discuss the future of the Community Reinvestment Act, 
including possible changes in light of developments in the financial 
services industry.
    <bullet> Credit scoring
    Members will discuss various issues related to credit scoring, 
including the impact of changes in the credit environment on scores.
    <bullet> Neighborhood and community stabilization
    Members will discuss strategies and challenges in the effort to 
stabilize communities affected by foreclosures, including the 
implementation of the Neighborhood Stabilization Program.
    <bullet> Foreclosure prevention
    Members will discuss loss-mitigation efforts, the performance of 
modified mortgages, and other issues related to foreclosures.
    Reports by committees and other matters initiated by Council 
members also may be discussed.
    Persons wishing to submit views to the Council on any of the above 
topics may do so by sending written statements to Jennifer Kerslake, 
Secretary of the Consumer Advisory Council, Division of Consumer and 
Community Affairs, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 
Washington, DC 20551. Information about this meeting may be obtained 
from Ms. Kerslake, 202-452-6470.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 26, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-12516 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 891 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 891

To extend the water service contract for the Ainsworth Unit, Sandhills 
         Division, Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program, Nebraska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 22, 2005

   Mr. Hagel introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the water service contract for the Ainsworth Unit, Sandhills 
         Division, Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program, Nebraska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AINSWORTH UNIT, SANDHILLS DIVISION, PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI 
              BASIN PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior shall extend for the 
period described in subsection (b) the water service contract for the 
Ainsworth Unit, Sandhills Division, Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program, 
Nebraska, consisting of--
            (1) the water service contract entered into by the 
        Secretary of the Interior under--
                    (A) section 9(e) of the Reclamation Project Act of 
                1939 (43 U.S.C. 485h(e));
                    (B) section 9(c) of the Act of December 22, 1944 
                (58 Stat. 887, chapter 665);
                    (C) the Act of August 21, 1954 (68 Stat. 757, 
                chapter 781); and
                    (D) the Act of May 18, 1956 (70 Stat. 160, chapter 
                285); and
            (2) the water service contract for the set project located 
        in Cherry, Brown, and Rock Counties, Nebraska, for the use of a 
        part of the waters of the Snake River, a tributary of the 
        Niobrara River.
    (b) Period of Extension.--The water service contract described in 
subsection (a) shall be extended for 4 years after the date on which 
the contract expires under the water service contract and law in 
existence before the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Motor Vehicle Safety Defects And Recalls

                                                                          Download file:                       Motor Vehicle Safety Defects And Recalls
EXHIBIT 10.1.4

                      THORNBURG MORTGAGE ASSET CORPORATION
                        AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
                              AS OF OCTOBER 1, 1998

     The  Management  Agreement  (the  "Management Agreement") between Thornburg
Mortgage Asset Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the "Company") and Thornburg
Mortgage  Advisory  Corporation,  a  Delaware  corporation  (the  "Manager"), is
amended,  effective  as  of  October  1,  1998,  as  follows:

                                    RECITALS

     This  amendment  to  the  Management  Agreement  is  being effected for the
purpose  of  amending the method of computing the Incentive Compensation payable
to the Manager pursuant to Section 7 of the Management Agreement, as approved by
the  Board  of  Directors  of  the  Company,  including  all  of the independent
directors,  on  October 16, 1998, and to restate and confirm in all respects the
Management  Agreement  as  so amended.  Capitalized terms used herein shall have
the  meanings  ascribed  to  them  in  the  Management  Agreement.

IT  IS  THEREFORE  AGREED  AS  FOLLOWS:

     1.     Section  7  of  the  Management Agreement is amended by adding after
subsection  (c)  thereof  the  following  as  subsection  7(d):

Solely  for  purposes  of calculating the Manager's Incentive Compensation under
Section  7(b), Average Net Worth shall be reduced by the amount that the Company
pays  for  the  purchase  of  Company  stock.

     2.     Section 7 of the Management Agreement is amended by adding after new
subsection  (d)  thereof  the  following  as  subsection  7(e):

Net  Income  of  the  Company,  solely for purposes of calculating the Manager's
Incentive  Compensation  under  Section 7(b), shall be determined by calculating
net  income,  including  deductions  and  charges  thereto,  in  accordance with
generally  accepted  accounting  principles  ("GAAP"),  as  determined  by  the
Company's  independent  certified  public  accountants.

     3.     The  Management  Agreement, as amended by this Amendment dated as of
October  1,  1998, is in all respects restated and affirmed between the parties.

     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  Company  and  the  Manager  hereby execute this
Amendment  to  the  Management  Agreement  as  of  October  1,  1998.


                             THORNBURG  MORTGAGE  ASSET  CORPORATION
                             a  Maryland  corporation

                             By:  /s/  Larry A. Goldstone
                                 ------------------------------
                                  Larry A. Goldstone, President

                             THORNBURG  MORTGAGE  ADVISORY  CORPORATION
                             a  Delaware  corporation

                             By:  /s/  Garrett Thornburg
                                 ----------------------------------
                                       Garrett Thornburg, President


                                       68
<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Robert W. Riland III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of DISC, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of DISC, Inc.

                                   By:    /s/ ROBERT W. RILAND, III
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Robert W. Riland, III
                                   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

         I, Henry Madrid, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of DISC, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of DISC, Inc.

                                   By:    /s/ HENRY MADRID
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Henry Madrid
                                   Title: Chief Financial Officer
The District Court of the 19th Judicial District. County of Lincoln.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. ERIC VOGEL, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-09-53 DECISION

On October 5,2009, the defendant was sentence as follows: Count II: Forty (40) years in the Montana State Prison, for the offense of Sexual Assault, a felony; CountV: Forty (40) years in the Montana State Prison, for the offense of Sexual Assault, a felony; Count VIII: Forty (40) years in the Montana State Prison, for the offense of Sexual Assault, a felony; Count XI: Forty (40) years in the Montana State Prison, for the offense of Sexual Assault, a felony; and Count XXV: Forty (40) years in the Montana State Prison, for the offense of Sexual Assault, a felony. Counts II, V, VIII, XI and XIV shall run concurrently with each other. The Defendant shall not be eligible for parole for twenty (20) years and shall not be eligible for parole until he completes Phases I and II of the Sexual Offender Treatment Program while imprisoned at the Montana State Prison.

On May 7,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present via videoconference and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

On or about April 16, 2010, counsel received a communication from the defendant stating that he wishes to “suspend this proceeding indefinitely.” The Sentence Review Division informed the defendant that the Division would not grant the defendant’s request to suspend the Application for Review of Sentence indefinitely. The defendant was given the option to either waive his hearing or continue the hearing until the August hearings, as Mr. Olson required additional time to prepare the case for a hearing. The defendant requested that his hearing be continued to the next set of hearings in August. The Sentence Review Division informed counsel and the defendant that there will be no further requests for continuances in this matter.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the Application for Review of Sentence shall be continued to the next set of hearings in August, 2010. Notice will be sent to counsel and defendant four weeks prior to the hearing providing the actual date and time.

Done in open Court this 7 th day of May, 2010.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
#### Jenkins v. Jones Onslow EMC

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 436

No. 100P07

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-23)

Denied 03/08/07