alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2900]

# SUMMARY:

A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). Oppositions to this petition must be filed by November 4, 2009. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.

Subject: In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 73 and 74 of the Commission's Rules to Establish Rules for Replacement Digital Low Power Television Translator Stations (MB Docket No. 08-253) 

NUMBER OF PETITIONS FILED: 1

Federal Communications Commission

*Marlene H. Dortch,*

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-25164 Filed 10-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-S
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence A. Gyenes, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Lawrence A. Gyenes


Lawrence A. Gyenes


Senior Vice President-


Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


August 5, 2010
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20892

michael.muchow@nih.gov

## Summary

Research and applications scientist with bench-top experience in academic, government, biotech, and clinical laboratories.

Expertise in molecular and cell biology, cancer research, bioinformatics, genetics, genomics, immunology, and statistics. Command-line bioinformatics experience. Laboratory management and customer support experience. Novel platform, assay development, and research project management experience.

## Scientific Publications

###             NCBI's Virus Discovery Codeathon: Building "FIVE" -The Federated Index of Viral Experiments API Index.        

12(12).

###             PubRunner: A light-weight framework for updating text mining results.        

6().

###             Mouse Prkar1a haploinsufficiency leads to an increase in tumors in the Trp53+/- or Rb1+/- backgrounds and chemically induced skin papillomas by dysregulation of the cell cycle and Wnt signaling.        

19(8).

###             Protein kinase A effects of an expressed PRKAR1A mutation associated with aggressive tumors.        

68(9).

###             Clinical and molecular genetics of patients with the Carney-Stratakis syndrome and germline mutations of the genes coding for the succinate dehydrogenase subunits SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD.        

16(1).

###             Multiple gastrointestinal stromal and other tumors caused by platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha gene mutations: a case associated with a germline V561D defect.        

92(9).

## Education

**University of Maryland, College Park**Ph.D., Molecular and Cell Biology

**University of Maryland, College Park**M.S., Animal Science

**University of Maryland, College Park**B.S., Biological Sciences

**University of Maryland, University College**Graduate School Certificate, Bioinformatics

## Experience

**Research Biologist (Bioinformatics)**NIST (2015-2017)

**Bioinformatics Collaborator**NCBI (2017)

**Sr. Research Specialist**Johns Hopkins School of Medicine (2020)

**Senior Scientist**AstraZeneca (2021-2022)

August 2023

Back to Top
EX-10.23



 



Exhibit
10.23





Coffeyville Acquisition LLC

10 E. Cambridge Circle, Ste. 250

Kansas City, Kansas 66103




October 24, 2007




Goldman, Sachs & Co.

85 Broad Street

New York, New York 10004




Kelso & Company, L.P.

320 Park Avenue, 24th Floor

New York, New York 10022



Ladies and Gentlemen:




     Reference is made to that letter agreement, dated June 24, 2005, by and between Coffeyville
Acquisition LLC (the “Company”) and Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“GS” and such letter, the
“GS Letter”), and that letter agreement, dated June 24, 2005, by and between the Company
and Kelso & Company, L.P. (“Kelso, and such letter, the “Kelso Letter”).



     The parties hereto acknowledge that (i) each of the GS Letter and the Kelso Letter will
terminate upon the consummation of the initial public offering of shares of common stock of CVR
Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a direct subsidiary of the Company, and (ii) the Company’s
obligations to indemnify each member of the Goldman Group (as such term is defined in the GS
Letter) and each member of the Kelso Group (as such term is defined in the Kelso Letter) and to
reimburse the out-of-pocket expenses of the Goldman Group and the Kelso Group, as outlined in the
GS Letter and the Kelso Letter, will survive such termination. The parties hereto further
acknowledge and agree that the fee payable with respect to such termination shall equal $10,000,000
($5,000,000 to GS and $5,000,000 to Kelso).



[signature page follows]




 









 








	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,



COFFEYVILLE ACQUISITION LLC

 	 
	 	By  	/s/  James
T. Rens	 
	 	 	Name:  	James T. Rens 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 



[Signature Page to Letter Agreement]




 









 








	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed and accepted:



GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.

 	 	 
	By:  	/s/  Kenneth
A. Pontarelli	 	 
	 	Name:  	 	 	 
	 	Title:  	 	 	 
	 
	KELSO & COMPANY, L.P.



By: Kelso & Companies, Inc.,

       its General Partner

 	 	 
	By:  	/s/  James
J. Connors, II	 	 
	 	Name:  	James J. Connors, II 	 	 
	 	Title:  	Vice President & General Counsel 	 	 
	 




[Signature Page to Letter Agreement]
#### Jeffrey S. Levinson, Appellant, v Mohiuddin Mollah et al., Respondents.

[963 NYS2d 653]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered February 23, 2012, which granted defendants Mohiuddin Mollah and Point West Trans Inc.’s motion and defendant Jonathon Morse’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury to his cervical spine and lumbar spine by submitting a neurologist’s affirmation stating that, upon conducting an examination of plaintiff, she found a full range of motion in every plane of both body parts, and compared plaintiffs values to normal *(see Steinbergin v Ali,*99 AD3d 609 [1st Dept 2012]). Contrary to plaintiffs argument, defendants’ expert was not required to specifically address the diagnostic findings in plaintiffs medical records *(see Robinson v Joseph,*99 AD3d 568 [1st Dept 2012]; *Fuentes v Sanchez,*91 AD3d 418, 419 [1st Dept 2012]; *Clemmer v Drah Cab Corp.,*74 AD3d 660, 660-661 [1st Dept 2010]). Plaintiffs’ remaining arguments attempting to undermine that affirmation are unpreserved for review and, in any event, unpersuasive *(see Feliz v Fragosa,*85 AD3d 417, 418 [1st Dept 2011]).

Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact in opposition. The only sworn evidence plaintiff proffered was an affidavit from his chiropractor who, following an examination conducted shortly after the one performed by defendants’ neurologist, acknowledged that both body parts exhibited a full range of motion in every plane, and offered no qualitative assessment of any limitations. Even if plaintiff’s unaffirmed MRI reports showing bulging discs could be considered, his showing would be insufficient because “bulging or herniated discs are not, in and of themselves, evidence of serious injury without competent objective evidence of the limitations and duration of the disc injury” *(Wetzel v Santana,*89 AD3d 554, 554 [1st Dept 2011]). Further, findings based on subjective complaints of pain are insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(Arenas v Guarnan,*98 AD3d 461 [1st Dept 2012]).

We need not determine whether defendant Morse’s cross motion for summary judgment was timely, because once it was established by defendants Mollah and Point West that plaintiff did not meet the serious injury threshold, the complaint would *645be dismissed as to all codefendants as well *(see Britton v Villa Auto Corp.,*89 AD3d 556 [1st Dept 2011]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Tom, J.E, Acosta, Román, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
2008 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
2-28-2008 

# U SA v . L angford P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 06-2774

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2008 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" U SA v . L a n gfor d " (2008). 2008 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1487. h tt p://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008/1487U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT
N o. 06- 2774
UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v. S HAWN L ANGF OR D, A ppel l ant
A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt fo rt he W e s t e r n Di s t r i c tof PA ( D . C
. C r i m i nal N o. 05- cr - 00151- 2) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e G ar yL . L anca s t er
A r gued N ovember 2, 2007 B efore: R E N D E L L , W E IS and N Y G A A R D , C i rcui tJudg es.

OR DE R A M E NDI NG OP I NI ON A tt he C our t ’ s di r ect i on, i ti s her ebyor dert hatt he opi ni on fi l ed on Februar y22, 2008 i n t he above r efe r ence d cas e be a m ended i n or dert o cor r ectcer t ai n for m at t i ng i s s ues pr es enti n t he di s s ent i ng opi ni on. T he C l er k s hal l fi l e an a m ended opi ni on. T he am en d m en t do es n o t cha n g e the o r alt er the su b stan ce o f th e o p inion an d this C o u rt ’s ju d g m e n t. F o r th e C o u rt,
M arc ia M
. W aldro n , C lerk D at ed: Februar y28, 2008 t m k/ cc: R ober tL . E ber har dt , E s q. R ebec ca R. H ayw ood, E s q. K i m ber l yR . B r uns on, E s q. R enee Pi et r opaol o, E s q.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44904

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

DONTAVIAN EILAND ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 650

Filed: November 21, 2017

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, Kootenai County. Hon. Lansing L. Haynes , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of six years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for felony driving under the influence of alcohol, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Dontavian Eiland pled guilty to felony driving under the influence of alcohol , Idaho Code

§§ 18

- 8004, 18

- 8005

. In exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed. The

district court imposed a unified sentence of six years, with a minimum period of confinement of

three years . Eiland filed an Idaho Cr iminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence, which the

district court denied. Eiland appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be co nsidered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and2 need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Eiland ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
```
**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT**

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements  No.
333-32308,  333-85483 and 333-100650 of Medix  Resources,  Inc. on Forms S-3 and
Registration  Statements No. 333-31684,  333-57558 and 333-73578 on Forms S-8 of
our report dated February 14, 2003, appearing in this annual report on Form 10-K
of Medix Resources, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                          /s/Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
                                             Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC

February 14, 2003
Denver, Colorado
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UTILX CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                       697
<INVENTORY>                                      5,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,450
<PP&E>                                          39,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,187
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,603
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,609
<CGS>                                           24,783
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   246
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    912
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                912
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       912
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment
No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Wolverine Tube, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Harold M. Karp, Principal
Executive Officer of Wolverine Tube, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wolverine Tube, Inc. and will be retained by Wolverine Tube, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Harold M. KarpHarold M. KarpPrincipal Executive OfficerPresident and Chief Operating OfficerDecember 23, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 103 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 103

            To correct the enrollment of the bill H.R. 889.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2006

 Mr. Stevens submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
            To correct the enrollment of the bill H.R. 889.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 889, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In the table of contents in section 2, strike the item 
        relating to section 414 and insert the following:

``Sec. 414. Navigational safety of certain facilities.''.
            (2) Strike section 414 and insert the following:

``SEC. 414. NAVIGATIONAL SAFETY OF CERTAIN FACILITIES.

    ``(a) Consideration of Alternatives.--In reviewing a lease, 
easement, or right-of-way for an offshore wind energy facility in 
Nantucket Sound under section 8(p) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands 
Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(p)), not later than 60 days before the date 
established by the Secretary of the Interior for publication of a draft 
environmental impact statement, the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall 
specify the reasonable terms and conditions the Commandant determines 
to be necessary to provide for navigational safety with respect to the 
proposed lease, easement, or right-of-way and each alternative to the 
proposed lease, easement, or right-of-way considered by the Secretary.
    ``(b) Inclusion of Necessary Terms and Conditions.--In granting a 
lease, easement, or right-of-way for an offshore wind energy facility 
in Nantucket Sound under section 8(p) of the Outer Continental Shelf 
Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(p)), the Secretary shall incorporate in the 
lease, easement, or right-of-way reasonable terms and conditions the 
Commandant determines to be necessary to provide for navigational 
safety.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### John Whitfield, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

Submitted December 6, 2010;

decided January 18, 2011

*741Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
#### Ruth Kassover et al., Respondents, v PVP-GCC Holdingco II, LLC, et al., Appellants. Prism Venture Partners, LLC, et al., Nonparty Appellants.

Submitted July 6, 2010;

decided September 14, 2010

Motions for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that *821the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judge Smith taking no part.