alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Claudette Morrison, Appellant, v Apostolic Faith Mission of Portland, Oregon et al., Respondents.

[974 NYS2d 568]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), entered April 17, 2012, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell while descending an interior staircase within the defendants’ premises. The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, contending, inter alia, that the staircase was not in a dangerous or defective condition. The Supreme Court granted the motion.

To impose liability upon a defendant landowner for a plaintiff’s injuries, there must be evidence showing the existence of a dangerous or defective condition, and that the defendant either created the condition or had actual or constructive notice of it and failed to remedy it within a reasonable time *(see Winder v Executive Cleaning Servs., LLC,*91 AD3d 865 [2012]; *Gonzalez v Natick NY Freeport Realty Corp.,*91 AD3d 597 [2012]; *Puma v New York City Tr. Auth.,*55 AD3d 585 [2008]). Here, the defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating, prima facie, that the subject staircase was not in a dangerous or defective condition. The subject staircase was constructed before the enact*685ment of the first New York City Building Code, and it was not in violation of any applicable regulation *(see Hyman v Queens County Bancorp,*307 AD2d 984 [2003]). The evidence submitted by the defendants, including transcripts of the deposition testimony of the parties, showed that the defendants satisfied their common-law duty to maintain the staircase in a reasonably safe condition, and that the staircase was free of any defects *(see Altschuler v Gramatan Mgt., Inc.,*27 AD3d 304 [2006]; *cf. Swerdlow v WSK Props. Corp.,*5 AD3d 587 [2004]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Mastro, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-24-00370-CV

Zaya Zavala

v.

7-Eleven, Inc. d/b/a Stripes

On Appeal from the

476th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-0065-24-M

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 15, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2620 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2620

  To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing n-butyl-1,2-
 benzisothiazolin-3-one (Butyl benzisothiazoline), 1-hydroxypyridine-2-
     thione, zinc salt (Zinc pyrithione) and application adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing n-butyl-1,2-
 benzisothiazolin-3-one (Butyl benzisothiazoline), 1-hydroxypyridine-2-
     thione, zinc salt (Zinc pyrithione) and application adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING N-BUTYL-1,2-BENZISOTHIAZOLIN-3-ONE 
              (BUTYL BENZISOTHIAZOLINE), 1-HYDROXYPYRIDINE-2-THIONE, 
              ZINC SALT (ZINC PYRITHIONE) AND APPLICATION ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Mixtures            Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          containing n-                                                      31/2011.......
                          butyl-1,2-
                          benzisothiazolin-
                          3-one (Butyl
                          benzisothiazoline
                          ) (CAS No. 4299-
                          07-4), 1-
                          hydroxypyridine-2-
                          thione, zinc salt
                          (Zinc pyrithione)
                          (CAS No. 13463-41-
                          7) and
                          application
                          adjuvants
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3808.99.08)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Karen Allen Mullinax v. State of Texas

Appellate case number s : 01

- 1 9

- 00 881

- C R

Trial court case number: 1616807

Tr ial court: 248th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Karen Allen Mullinax , has filed a third motion for extension of ti me to file h er

motion for rehearing and en banc reconsideration. The motion is denied

. Any motion for

rehearing and e n banc reconsideration must be filed by August 17, 2021 as previously ordered by

the Court.

It is s o ORDERED.

Judge’s signat ure:

___________ /s/ Ju lie Countiss

_____ ______________ Acting individually

Date: August 17 , 2021
No. 782.

#### Skinner *v.*Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson, Attorney General.

January 12, 1942.

*Messrs. W. J. Hulsey*and *Heba I. Aston*for petitioner.
EXHIBIT 32.1
  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Digital Media
Corporation (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Daniel Ng, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
Company, certify that:
 
 * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 *
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates
and for the periods presented.
   /s/
      Ng Chi Shing
                Ng
      Chi Shing
                Director,
      President, Chief Executive Officer
                
                /s/
      Ng Chi Shing
                Ng
      Chi Shing
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                
                May
      12, 2009
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10−K for the year ended December 31, 2010, of Craft Brewers Alliance, Inc.; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BY:    | /s/ Terry E. Michaelson                                |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |       Terry E. Michaelson     |
|   |   |       Chief Executive Officer |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, July 21, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988)                           ( print page 26483)                        that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, July 21, 2009, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: May 27, 2009. 

Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E9-12733 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry A. Goldstone, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Larry A. Goldstone               
|Larry A. Goldstone                   
|President and Chief Operating Officer
|March 1, 2005
EXHIBIT
32.1




STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Digital Media
Corporation (the "Company") for the six months ended JUNE 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Daniel Ng, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
Company, certify that:







·
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





·
            information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates
      and for the periods presented.








/s/
      Ng Chi Shing
              ---------------------
              Ng
      Chi Shing
              Director,
      President, Chief Executive Officer
              
              /s/
      Ng Chi Shing
              ---------------------
              Ng
      Chi Shing
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              
              August
      13, 2008








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
**Exhibit 15.2**

**ENFORCEMENT DECREE OF THE FRAMEWORK ACT ON**

**TELECOMMUNICATIONS**

 

**
 
**

Amended by Enforcement Decree No. 22605 of Dec. 31, 2010, effective Jan. 24, 2011 

**CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS**

**Article 1 (Purpose)**

The purpose of this Enforcement Decree is to providematters delegated under the Framework Act on Telecommunications (the “Act”) and matters necessary for its enforcement. 

**CHAPTER II Deleted <2009.8.18>**

Article 2 Deleted <2009.8.18> 

Article 3 Deleted <2009.8.18> 

Article 4 Deleted <2009.8.18> 

Article 5Deleted <2009.8.18> 

Article 6 Deleted <2009.8.18> 

Article 7 Deleted <2009.8.18> 

Article 8 Deleted <2009.8.18> 

Article 9 Deleted <2009.8.18> 

Article10 Deleted <2009.8.18> 

**CHAPTER III TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT**

Article 11 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article12 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 13 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 14 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 15 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 16 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 17 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 18 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 19 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article20 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 21 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 22 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 23 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 24 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article25 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 26 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 27 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 28 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 29 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article30 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 31 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 32 Deleted <2010.12.31> 

**CHAPTER IV Deleted <2010.12.27>**

Article 33 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 34 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 35 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 36 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article37 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 38 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 39 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 40 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 41 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 42 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

**CHAPTER IV Deleted <2010.12.27>**

Article 43 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 44 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 45 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article46 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 47 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 48 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 49 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 50 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article51 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

**CHAPTER VI SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS**

Article 52 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article53 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 54 Deleted <2010.12.31> 

Article 54-2 Deleted <2010.12.27> 

Article 55 Deleted <2010.12.31> 

**ADDENDA <Amended by No. 22605, Dec. 31, 2010>**

Article 1 (Enforcement Date) This Decree shall be effective as of January 24, 2011. <Proviso Omitted> 

Article 2 through Article 12 Omitted 

Article 13 (Amendment of Other Laws) (1) through(3) Omitted 

(4) Enforcement Decree of the Framework Act on Telecommunication shall be partly amended as follows:

Article 32 shall be deleted 

Article 54 and Article 55 shall each be deleted. 

(5) through (9) Omitted
|EXHIBIT 32
|----------

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

This certification is given by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Venture Financial Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  Each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, with respect to the Registrant's annual report of Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

/s/ Ken F. Parsons, Sr.
Ken F. Parsons, Sr. 
Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board (principal executive officer)

/s/ Sandra L. Sager , CPA
Sandra L. Sager, CPA 
(principal financial officer; and principal accounting officer)



|March 28, 2008
|--------------

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                         27,591
<SECURITIES>                                   16,453
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,950)
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               64,631
<PP&E>                                         35,189
<DEPRECIATION>                                (25,619)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 76,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23,947
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       94,597
<OTHER-SE>                                    (46,358)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   76,723
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               67,140
<CGS>                                          18,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  70,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,431)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,001)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      833
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,834)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,834)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)



</TABLE>
#### Keith BRUNDIGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis JENSEN, of the Prince William County Police Department, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-1599.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 2, 2006.

Keith Brundige, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Keith Brundige appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Brundige v. Jensen,*No. 1:06-cv-00111-TSE (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*179fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-10-043-CV

JIM SHAW, DEFENDANT-SURETY APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Through a letter that we sent to appellant Jim Shaw on February 10,

2010, we have given him an opportunity to explain why his notice of appeal

was untimely filed

2

and why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 The trial court signed its final judgment on October 16, 2009.

Although appellant timely filed a motion for new trial on November 13, 2009,

he did not file his notice of appeal in the trial court until February 3, 2010, and

it was therefore untimely. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(a); Tex. R. App. P.

26.1(a)(1).
jurisdiction. He has not done so. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want

of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b), 26.1(a)(1), 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Crites

v. Collins, 284 S.W.3d 839, 840 (Tex. 2009) (indicating that the timely filing

of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional); Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care Sys.,

160 S.W.3d 559, 564 (Tex. 2005) (same).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 18, 2010

2
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2676 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain synthetic staple fibers that are 

not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain synthetic staple 

fibers that are not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SYNTHETIC STAPLE FIBERS THAT 

4 ARE NOT CARDED, COMBED, OR OTHERWISE 

5 PROCESSED FOR SPINNING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2676 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic staple fiber composed 

of less than 85 percent but at 

least 35 percent by weight of 

acrylonitrile units, not more 

than 2 to 3 percent water, 

imported in the form of nonpigmented (ecru) staple 

crimped product with an average filament decitex of 1.9 

(plus or minus 10 percent), 

and fiber staple length of 51 

mm (plus or minus 10 percent) (provided for in subheading 5503.30.00) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS