alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000822084
<NAME> INNERDYNE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,007,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,778,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                   130,082
<INVENTORY>                                  1,187,846
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,250,986
<PP&E>                                       4,856,574
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,041,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,111,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,482,570
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       218,402
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,835,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,111,532
<SALES>                                      7,749,973
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,578,408
<CGS>                                        2,728,325
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,789,726
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (125,522)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (125,522)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
No. 814.

#### State Tax Commission of Utah *v.*Aldrich et al., Administrators.

January 12, 1942.

*Mr. Henry G.*Gray for respondents.
EXHIBIT 24.7
 

  SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC.  POWER OF ATTORNEY

SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB

             The undersigned, in his capacity as a director of SI Diamond  Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), after reviewing the Company's Form 10-KSB,  does hereby appoint Douglas P. Baker, his true and lawful attorney to execute in his  name, place and stead, in his capacity as a Director of said Company, the  Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,  2001, and all instruments necessary or incidental in connection therewith,  including all amendments, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange  Commission. Said attorney shall have the full power and authority to do and  perform, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all  capacities, every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done in the  premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or  could do in person, the undersigned hereby ratifying and approving the acts of  said attorney.

             IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument this  13th day of March, 2002.

                                              /s/ Eddie Lee                                                 Eddie Lee
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William HAZEL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-6793.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 22, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 26, 2006.

*257William Hazel, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

William Hazel, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order construing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and dismissing it as successive. Although Hazel alternatively sought, and received, transfer of his § 2241 petition from the District of Kansas, his place of confinement, to the Eastern District of Virginia, the sentencing court, Hazel states that he intended to file a § 2241 petition raising a challenge to the manner in which his sentence was calculated. Judicial review of a § 2241 petition must be sought in the district of confinement rather than the sentencing court. *In re: Jones,*226 F.3d 328, 333 (4th Cir.2000). In cases such as this one, where relief pursuant to § 2241 is sought in the sentencing court, the court is without jurisdiction to consider the request. On this basis, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of Hazel’s § 2241 petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.*
Exhibit 23.1 

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 

 

Board of Directors and Shareholders 

Epicor Software Corporation 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-97063, 333-06419, 333-41321, 333-67841, 333-85105, and 333-107738 of Epicor SoftwareCorporation on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-38105, 333-46395 and 333-104277 of Epicor Software Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated February 18, 2004 appearing in this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A ofEpicor Software Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Costa Mesa, California 

April 7, 2004
## Breadcrumb

-  Página Principal 
-  Acerca Del NIDCD 

# Mensajes de la directora del NIDCD

Debara L. Tucci,M.D., M.S., M.B.A.

## Las mascarillas faciales y el distanciamiento social plantean desafíos de comunicación para muchas personas

La comunicación es una transacción importante y compleja que depende de señales visuales y a menudo auditivas. Los factores que influyen en qué tan bien se recibe nuestro lenguaje hablado incluyen nuestro contacto visual y lenguaje corporal, ya sea que estemos de pie o sentados al hablar, nuestro tono de voz y expresiones faciales, así como la iluminación ambiental y el ruido de fondo.

Seguir Leyendo

## Un mensaje de la directora del NIDCD

La misión del Instituto Nacional de la Sordera y Otros Trastornos de la Comunicación (NIDCD, por sus siglas en inglés) es mejorar la vida de millones de personas con pérdida de audición y otros trastornos de la comunicación, y abarca las funciones de audición, equilibrio, gusto, olfato, voz, habla y lenguaje.

Seguir Leyendo

17 de julio de 2020

## Idiomas

          - English
          - Español

- Pedir publicaciones gratis
- Buscar organizaciones
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-1013 (Review)] 

## Determination 

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on saccharin from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                 

## Background 

                    The Commission instituted this review on June 2, 2008 (73 FR 31504) and determined on September 5, 2008 that it would conduct a full review (73 FR 53444, September 16, 2008). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission's review and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 1, 2008 (73 FR 72837). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on March 26, 2009, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.                 

                    The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on May 21, 2009. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4077 (May 2009), entitled                     *Saccharin From China: Investigation No. 731-TA-1013 (Review)*.                 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 27, 2009. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E9-12633 Filed 5-29-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-09-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kurt R. Kneip, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Inter-Tel, Incorporated.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation, andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing equivalent functions):  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: November 5, 2004 By:
    
    /s/ Kurt R. KneipName:
    
    Kurt R. KneipTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
 39
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Action Performance
Companies, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Fred W. Wagenhals, Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Fred W. WagenhalsFred W. WagenhalsChief Executive OfficerDecember 10, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Prendergast, Appellant.

Submitted September 27, 2010;

decided October 14, 2010

*862Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 15, 2006 

# Order

September 15, 2006

131013 & (22)
131014

MARY LOU KLINGLER, Personal Representative of the Estate of MATTHEW J. KLINGLER, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,
SC 131013-4 v CoA 267452, 268945
Oakland CC 03-054932-NH ASHOK K. GUPTA, M.D., ASHOK K. GUPTA, M.D., P.C., KEWAL K. AGGARWAL, M.D., KEWAL K. AGGARWAL, M.D., P.C., Defendants-Appellees,
and

CRITTENTON HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, a s tipulation signed by th e attorneys for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered and, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the applicati on for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fred
Wilkinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                               /s/ Fred Wilkinson
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Fred Wilkinson
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               May 14, 2003
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2556 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Methyl-4-methoxy-6- 

methylamino-1,3,5-triazine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. BURRIS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Methyl4-methoxy-6-methylamino-1,3,5-triazine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-METHYL-4-METHOXY-6-METHYLAMINO-1,3,5- 

4 TRIAZINE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.44 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 2-Methyl-4-methoxy-6-methylamino-1,3,5-triazine) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2011’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2556 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
-  Home 
        -  About NIDDK 
        -  Strategic Plans & Reports 
        -  United States Renal Data System 
        -  For Researchers 
        -  Researcher's Guide 

USRDS
- USRDS Home
-  Annual Data Report 
-  Prior Data Reports 
-  For ResearchersShow child pages    -  Simple Data Requests 
  -  Standard Analysis Files 
  -  Merged Data Requests 
  -  Researcher's Guide 
-  ESRD Quarterly Update 
-  Data Query ToolsShow child pages    -  ESRD Incident Count 
  -  ESRD Prevalent Count 
  -  ESRD Mortality Rate 
  -  ESRD Hospitalization Rate 
-  USRDS NewsShow child pages    -  Publication Spotlights 
-  About USRDSShow child pages    -  Publications 

# Researcher's Guide

The 2023 Researcher's Guide to the USRDS Database is currently available. You will need the Acrobat Reader to view the Guide.

## 2023 Researcher's Guide to the USRDS Database

Researcher's Guide (PDF, 1.74 MB)

Appendix B: Data File Descriptions(XLSX, 637.94 KB)

Appendix C: Data Formatting (XLSX, 618.42 KB)

Standard Analysis Files (SAF) Data Request

## Accessibility

usrds@niddk.nih.gov

## Contact USRDS

**  **Email:**usrds@niddk.nih.gov
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40261

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISIDRO GOMEZ-SALINAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-03-CR-916-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Isidro GomezSalinas concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by

circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. 

The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing

an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
#### LaSalle Bank National Association, Respondent, v Keisha Henderson, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Submitted August 2, 2010;

decided September 14, 2010

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*14 NY3d 934 (2010)].

Judge Jones taking no part.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i)      the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
     the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with
     the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

     Dated: April 27, 2004                       /s/ Clyde B. Anderson
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Clyde B. Anderson
                                                 Executive Chairman of the Board
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                            15,708
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  15,708
<PP&E>                            22,184
<DEPRECIATION>                    (5,551)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 4,644,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            695,877
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                       1,039,977
<OTHER-SE>                     3,604,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   4,644,377
<SALES>                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       0
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  2,369,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   4,280
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (2,373,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (2,373,403)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                  (2,373,403)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (.216)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0



</TABLE>