alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,952
<SECURITIES>                                    55,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,404
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,557)
<INVENTORY>                                     38,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,725
<PP&E>                                          59,944
<DEPRECIATION>                                (25,393)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,848
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,044
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   207,026
<SALES>                                         26,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,799
<CGS>                                           20,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,980
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   160
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,651)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,007)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,644)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,644)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0)
        

</TABLE>
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 10

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas an estimated 1,006,970 women and 370,990 men

are stalked annually in the United States and, in the majority of such cases, the person is stalked by someone

who is not a stranger;

Whereas 81 percent of women who are stalked by an intimate

partner are also physically assaulted by that partner, and

76 percent of women who are killed by an intimate partner were also stalked by that intimate partner;

Whereas 26 percent of stalking victims lose time from work

as a result of their victimization and 7 percent never return to work;

Whereas stalking victims are forced to take drastic measures

to protect themselves, such as relocating, changing their

addresses, changing their identities, changing jobs, and

obtaining protection orders;

Whereas stalking is a crime that cuts across race, culture,

gender, age, sexual orientation, physical and mental ability, and economic status;

Whereas stalking is a crime under Federal law and under the

laws of all 50 States and the District of Columbia;

Whereas rapid advancements in technology have made cybersurveillance the new frontier in stalking;
 †

2

SCON 10 ES

Whereas there are national organizations, local victim service

organizations, prosecutors’ offices, and police departments that stand ready to assist stalking victims and who

are working diligently to craft competent, thorough, and

innovative responses to stalking;

Whereas there is a need to enhance the criminal justice system’s response to stalking and stalking victims, including

aggressive investigation and prosecution; and

Whereas Congress urges the establishment of January, 2006

as National Stalking Awareness Month: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) it is the sense of Congress that—

4 (A) National Stalking Awareness Month

5 provides an opportunity to educate the people of

6 the United States about stalking;

7 (B) all Americans should applaud the ef8 forts of the many victim service providers, po9 lice, prosecutors, national and community orga10 nizations, and private sector supporters for

11 their efforts in promoting awareness about

12 stalking; and

13 (C) policymakers, criminal justice officials,

14 victim service and human service agencies, non15 profits, and others should recognize the need to
†

3

SCON 10 ES

1 increase awareness of stalking and availability

2 of services for stalking victims; and

3 (2) Congress urges national and community or4 ganizations, businesses in the private sector, and the

5 media to promote, through National Stalking Aware6 ness Month, awareness of the crime of stalking.

Passed the Senate November 10, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 10

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Resolution raising awareness and encouraging preas ‘‘National Stalking Awareness Month’’. vention of stalking by establishing January 2006
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL E. SPREADBURY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH &

HUMAN SERVICES; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-35901

D.C. No. 9:10-cv-00081-DWM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Michael E. Spreadbury appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing for lack of standing his action alleging that demolition and construction

activities related to the Rocky Mountain Laboratories (the “Laboratories”) in

FILED

JAN 11 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-35901

Hamilton, Montana violated the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42

U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq. (the “Act”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Barren v.

Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Spreadbury’s action for failure to

satisfy constitutional and prudential standing requirements. First, Spreadbury

failed to describe how defendants’ alleged construction activities in violation of the

Act resulted in an injury to his personal, concrete interests. See Nuclear Info. &

Res. Serv. v. NRC, 457 F.3d 941, 949-50 (9th Cir. 2006) (setting forth

constitutional standing requirements). Second, Spreadbury failed to allege how

defendants’ alleged actions injured him within the zone of interests protected by

the Act. See Ashley Creek Phosphate Co. v. Norton, 420 F.3d 934, 940 (9th Cir.

2005) (setting forth prudential standing requirements).

Spreadbury’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wolverine Tube, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James E.
Deason, Chief Financial Officer of Wolverine Tube, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wolverine Tube, Inc. and will be retained by Wolverine Tube, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ James E. DeasonJames E. DeasonChief Financial OfficerNovember 9, 2007
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, John E. Yetter, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc., hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 of Derma Sciences, Inc. (the “Form 10-K”) upon my best knowledge and belief fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences, Inc.





Dated:  March 29, 2011
/s/ John E. YetterJohn E. Yetter, CPAVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2610 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2610

       To suspend temporarily the duty on digital camera lenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on digital camera lenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIGHTWEIGHT DIGITAL CAMERA LENSES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Lenses designed     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        for digital                                                        31/2011.......
                        cameras, the
                        foregoing with a
                        focal length
                        measuring
                        approximately 10
                        mm or more but
                        not over 24 mm
                        and weighing
                        between 455 and
                        465 grams
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        9002.11.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Annual Report of International Barrier Technology Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Corcoran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material

respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the

Company.



/s/ David Corcoran

David Corcoran

CFO/Director

October 14, 2008
No. 950.

#### McArthur et al., a Copartnership, doing business as Anaconda Van Lines, *v.*United States et al.

March 30, 1942.

*Mr. L. Q. C. Lamar*for appellants. *Solicitor General Fahy*and *Mr.*
      *788
      *Darnel W. Knowlton*for appellees.

*787
      *Per Curiam:*

It does not appear that the questions involved in this appeal are substantial. The motion to affirm is therefore granted and the judgment is affirmed. *United States*v. *N. E. Rosenblum Truck Lines, Inc., ante,*p. 50; *Lubetich*v. *United States, ante,*p. 57.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25727-25728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1118-000]


SESCO CALISO, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

May 21, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
SESCO CALISO, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is June 10, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be

[[Page 25728]]

listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an 
eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling 
link to log on and submit the intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC, 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5d1b180f1e1233313433380e282d2d322f291d3b382f3e733a322b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c88e8d9a8b87a6a4a1a6ad9bbdb8b8a7babc88aeadbaabe6afa7be">[email protected]</span></a>. or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12440 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Juliette DeJoie Cadichon et al., Appellants, v Thomas Facelle, M.D., et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 31, 2011;

decided February 22, 2011

Motions to strike material from the record on appeal and references thereto in appellants’ brief granted to the extent of deeming stricken appellants’ notice of motion for reargument and renewal and material in support thereof and references thereto in appellants’ brief.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 103 (Monday, June 1, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26091-26092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12685]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

36 CFR Part 223, 261

RIN 0596-AB81


Sale and Disposal of National Forest System Timber; Special 
Forest Products and Forest Botanical Products

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department is delaying the effective date of this rule. 
The Department previously delayed the effective date on March 30, 2009. 
More time is needed for the Forest Service to properly respond to the 
comments and to consider any potential changes to the rule. A Federal 
Register document will be published in the future that responds to the 
comments and sets the effective date. The rule regulates the 
sustainable free use, commercial harvest, and sale of special forest 
products and forest botanical products from National Forest System 
lands.

DATES: Effective May 29, 2009, the effective date for the rule 
published at 73 FR 79367, December 29, 2008, and delayed at 74 FR 
14049, March 30, 2009, is delayed indefinitely. Forest Service will 
publish notification in the Federal Register when an effective date is 
established.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Fitzgerald, Forest Service, 
Forest Management Staff, (202) 205-

[[Page 26092]]

1753. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department is delaying the effective 
date of the final rule published December 29, 2008 (73 FR 79367), which 
regulates the sustainable free use, commercial harvest, and sale of 
special forest products and forest botanical products from National 
Forest System lands. The Department previously delayed the effective 
date on March 30, 2009 (74 FR 14049). Further delay is necessary, 
because more time is needed for the Forest Service to properly respond 
to the comments and to consider any potential changes to the rule.

    Dated: May 27, 2009.
Ann Bartuska,
Acting Deputy Under Secretary, Natural Resources and Environment.
 [FR Doc. E9-12685 Filed 5-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. BRANDON ILLIG, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-09-329 DECISION

On May 4,2010, the defendant was sentenced to the following: Count I: Ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison, with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Theft, a Felony; Count III: Eight (8) years in the Montana State Prison, with eight (8) years suspended, to run consecutive to the sentence imposed in Count I, for the offense of Criminal Endangerment, a Felony; and Count IV: A commitment to the Missoula County Detention Center for a term of one (1) year, with one (1) year suspended, to run concurrent with the sentence imposed in Count I, for the offense of Fleeing from or Eluding a Peace Officer, a High Misdemeanor.

On November 4, 2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Lindsey Pilecki. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division *93that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 4th day of November, 2010.

DATED this 18th day of November, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Wolverine Tube, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending July 5, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David A. Owen, Chief Financial Officer of
Wolverine Tube, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.





Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Wolverine Tube, Inc. and will be retained by Wolverine Tube, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





/s/
      David A. OwenDavid
      A. OwenSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
  Secretary


Date:  August
18, 2009
No. 839.

#### Polito *v.*Molasky et al.

February 9, 1942.

*Messrs. N. Murry Edwards*and *George C. Dyer, II,*for petitioner.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Ashworth, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   June 9, 2008
 /s/ Greg W. SlackGreg W. SlackChief Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer