alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2475 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires entered on or after 

November 3, 2004, and on or before September 14, 2005. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires entered on or after November 3, 2004, and on or before 

September 14, 2005. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 ENTRIES OF TRUCK TIRES ENTERED ON OR 

5 AFTER NOVEMBER 3, 2004, AND ON OR BE6 FORE SEPTEMBER 14, 2005. 

7 (a) LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION REQUIRED.— 

8 Notwithstanding sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff Act 

9 of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520), or any other provi10 sion of law, U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2475 IS

1 not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

2 of this Act— 

3 (1) liquidate or reliquidate as free of duty each 

4 entry described in subsection (b) containing any 

5 merchandise which, at the time of original liquida6 tion, was merchandise eligible for duty-free treat7 ment under title V of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

8 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.); and 

9 (2) refund any duties and interest paid on such 

10 entries. 

11 (b) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in 

12 subsection (a) are the following: 

Port Code Entry Number Date of Entry 

2704 EA1–0153651–7 11/03/2004 

2704 EA1–0153788–7 10/10/2004 

2704 EA1–0154063–4 11/24/2004 

2704 EA1–0154174–9 12/01/2004 

2704 EA1–0154298–6 12/08/2004 

2704 EA1–0154438–8 12/15/2004 

2704 EA1–0154567–4 12/22/2004 

2704 EA1–0154675–5 12/29/2004 

2704 EA1–0154802–5 01/05/2005 

2704 EA1–0154944–5 01/12/2005 

2704 EA1–0155108–6 01/19/2005 

2704 EA1–0155204–3 01/26/2005 

2704 EA1–0155329–8 02/02/2005 

2704 EA1–0155440–3 02/09/2005 

2704 EA1–0155577–2 02/16/2005 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2475 IS

Port Code Entry Number Date of Entry 

2704 EA1–0155668–9 02/23/2005 

2704 EA1–0155775–2 03/04/2005 

2704 EA1–0155838–8 03/09/2005 

2704 EA1–0155933–7 03/16/2005 

2704 EA1–0156034–3 03/23/2005 

2704 EA1–0156298–4 04/06/2005 

2704 EA1–0156435–2 04/14/2005 

2704 EA1–0156536–7 04/20/2005 

2704 EA1–0156651–4 04/27/2005 

2704 EA1–0156804–9 05/04/2005 

2704 EA1–0156935–1 05/11/2005 

2704 EA1–0157087–0 05/18/2005 

2704 EA1–0157220–7 05/25/2005 

2704 EA1–0157347–8 06/01/2005 

2704 EA1–0157475–7 06/08/2005 

2704 EA1–0157605–9 06/15/2005 

2704 EA1–0157739–6 06/22/2005 

2704 EA1–0157892–3 06/29/2005 

2704 EA1–0158016–8 07/06/2005 

2704 EA1–0158147–1 07/13/2005 

2704 EA1–0158282–6 07/20/2005 

2704 EA1–0158393–1 07/27/2005 

2704 EA1–0158567–0 08/03/2005 

2704 EA1–0158669–4 08/10/2005 

2704 EA1–0158847–6 08/17/2005 

2704 EA1–0158996–1 08/24/2005 

2704 EA1–0159133–0 09/07/2005 

2704 EA1–0159264–3 09/07/2005 

2704 EA1–0159407–8 09/14/2005. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40363

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

FRANK C. ALESI,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 641

Filed: August 28, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Richard D. Greenwood, District Judge. 

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben Patrick McGreevy, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Frank C. Alesi pled guilty to two counts of felony using a telephone to harass. Idaho 

Code § 18-6710. The district court sentenced Alesi to a unified sentence of five years with two 

years determinate for the first count and a consecutive sentence of five years indeterminate for 

the second count. Alesi filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court denied. 

Alesi appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by denying his I.C.R. 35 

motion.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, 

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In 

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of 
2

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the 

motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). An appeal from the 

denial of a Rule 35 motion cannot be used as a vehicle to review the underlying sentence absent 

the presentation of new information. Id. Because no new or additional information in support of 

Alesi’s Rule 35 motion was presented, the district court did not abuse its discretion. In addition, 

the district court’s articulation in response to Alesi’s motion for reconsideration of its reasoning 

in denying the motion shows no abuse of discretion. For the foregoing reasons, the district 

court’s order denying Alesi’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2632 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2632

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electrical connectors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Gillibrand) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electrical connectors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Banana jack         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        connectors                                                         31/2011.......
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8536.69.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

    (i)          the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

    (ii)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   | Dated: April 16, 2009 | /s/ Brian W. White   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------------------------------|

|   | Brian W. White |
|--------|----------------|

|   | Interim Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|---------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12573]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-549-822]


Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Notice of 
Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of the Third 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: May 29, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate Johnson at (202) 482-4929, or 
David Goldberger at (202) 482-4136, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20230.

Background

    On March 9, 2009, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published a notice for the preliminary results of the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp 
from Thailand covering the period February 1, 2007, through January 31, 
2008. See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 10000 (March 
9, 2009). The final results for this administrative review are 
currently due no later than July 7, 2009, 120 days from the date of 
publication of the preliminary results of review.

Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), requires the Department to issue the final results of an 
administrative review within 120 days after the date on which the 
preliminary results are published. If it is not practicable to complete 
the review within that time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 
allows the Department to extend the deadline for the final results to a 
maximum of 180 days after the date on which the preliminary results are 
published.
    The Department requires additional time to complete this review 
because we conducted the sales verification after the preliminary 
results and, therefore, case and rebuttal briefs will not be received 
until May 29, 2009, and June 9, 2009, respectively. Thus, it is not 
practicable to complete this review within the original time limit. 
Therefore, the Department is extending the time limit for completion of 
the final results of this review by 60 days, in accordance with section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. The final results are now due no later than 
September 8, 2009.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: May 22, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-12573 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Motion to enlarge record denied.

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Garcia, Appellant.

[964 NYS2d 55]

—An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J), rendered on or about June 17, 2011, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Gonzalez, PJ., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Renwick and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2487 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2487

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on crotonic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on crotonic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CROTONIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.04.10 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to crotonic acid) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1





---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IEA Income Fund VIII on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dennis J. Tietz, the President and
Director of Cronos Capital Corp. (CCC) and Principal Executive Officer of the
CCC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                              
| | ---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.
|
| |      |  | August 13, 2002                                                                                                                                    

| |                                                                                                           |                    
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------
| | By                                                                                                        | /s/ Dennis J. Tietz
| |                                                                                                          
| | Dennis J. Tietz
President and Director of Cronos Capital Corp. (CCC)
Principal Executive Officer of CCC
# Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

# AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CNH Holdings Company on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Cindy Garr, Interim C.F.O.of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Cindy Garr  Cindy Garr
Interim C.F.O., Executive Vice-President
of Corporate Development,and Director (Principal Financial
Officer)

August 12, 2004

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James
A. Meer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(3)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(4)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.











/s/ James A.
Meer


James A.
Meer


Chief
Financial Officer


May 7,
2009
#### Webb v. Hardy

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 324

No. 187P07

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-907)

Denied 10/11/07
-  Home 
        -  Health Information 
        -  For Health Professionals 
        -  Diabetes Discoveries & Practice Blog 
        -  Archive Results 

Diabetes Discoveries & Practice Blog

## Archive Results

                Results 1 - 3 of 3 for:                     **February 2020**

## Interpreting A1C: Variability Across Populations

Feb. 19, 20200 Comments
              - Medication and Monitoring
              - Social Determinants of Health

            A1C is a useful but imperfect tool for diagnosis of diabetes, because test responses vary considerably across ethnic and racial populations.             Read more

## Interpreting A1C: Diabetes and Hemoglobin Variants

Feb. 12, 20200 Comments
              - Medication and Monitoring

            Randie R. Little, PhD, explains what health care professionals need to know about factors that can interfere with A1C test results.            Read more

## Interpreting A1C: Principles of the A1C Assay

Feb. 5, 20200 Comments
              - Medication and Monitoring

            What are the key issues that health care professionals should understand when interpreting hemoglobin A1C assays?            Read more

## Blog Tools

### Subscribe

Subscribe to get blog updates.

### Share this page

FacebookXEmailWhatsAppLinkedInRedditPinterest

### Search

### About

**Diabetes Discoveries and Practice Blog**

### Tags

Patient Communication64

Research Advancements45

Complications of Diabetes35

Medication and Monitoring29

Practice Transformation25

Diabetes Prevention24

Patient Self-Management22

Obesity and Weight Management20

Social Determinants of Health19

New Technologies17

Diabetic Kidney Disease15

Type 1 Diabetes15

Nutrition12

Shared Decision-Making12

Community Health8

### Archive

April 20241

March 20241

Feb. 20241

Jan. 20241

Dec. 20231

Nov. 20231

Oct. 20231

Aug. 20231

July 20231

June 20232

May 20231

April 20231

March 20231

Feb. 20231

Jan. 20232

Dec. 20221

Nov. 20222

Oct. 20222

Sept. 20222

Aug. 20223

July 20222

June 20222

May 20222

April 20222

March 20222

Feb. 20222

Jan. 20222

Dec. 20212

Nov. 20211

Oct. 20212

Sept. 20212

Aug. 20212

July 20212

June 20213

May 20212

April 20212

March 20212

Feb. 20212

Jan. 20211

Dec. 20202

Nov. 20202

Oct. 20204

Sept. 20205

Aug. 20204

July 20203

June 20202

May 20202

April 20201

March 20202

Feb. 20203

Jan. 20202

Dec. 20193

Nov. 20192

Oct. 20192

Sept. 20193

Aug. 20193

July 20193

June 20192

May 20194

April 20192

March 20192

Feb. 20191

Jan. 20192

Dec. 20182

Nov. 20184

Oct. 20184

Sept. 20182

Aug. 20185

July 20183

June 20184

May 20185

April 20184

March 20183

Feb. 20184

Jan. 20183

Dec. 20173

Nov. 20174

Oct. 20172

Sept. 20174

### Disclaimer

We welcome comments; all comments must follow our comment policy.

Blog posts written by individuals from outside the government may be owned by the writer and graphics may be owned by their creator. In such cases, it is necessary to contact the writer, artist, or publisher to obtain permission for reuse.
Exhibit 3.3**AMENDMENT OF****AMENDED AND RESTATED****ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF**
**ONELINK, INC.**
     The Undersigned, Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary ofOneLink, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the “**Corporation**”), hereby certifiesthat the following Amendment of Amended and Restated Articles of Amendment havebeen duly adopted by the Corporation’s Board of Directors, pursuant to theprovisions of the Minnesota Business Corporation Act:
          1. The name of the Corporation is: OneLink, Inc.
          2. Article III of the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Articles ofIncorporation is amended to read in its entirety as follows:
          “3.1 Authorized Shares. The aggregate number of sharesthe corporation has authority to issue shall be 16,666,666shares, which shall have a par value of $0.01 per share, andwhich shall consist of 13,333,333 shares of Common Stock and466,666 undesignated shares.
          The Board of Directors of the corporation is authorizedto establish from the undesignated shares, by resolutionadopted and filed in the manner provided by law, one or moreclasses or series of shares, to designate each such class orseries (which may include but is not limited to designationas additional shares of Common Stock), and to fix therelative rights and preferences of each such class orseries.
          The Board of Directors shall have the authority toissue shares of a class or series, shares of which may thenbe outstanding, to holders of shares of another class orseries to effectuate share dividends, splits or conversionof its outstanding shares.”
          3. This amendment is a result of the Corporation’s 1-for-3 stockcombination declared by the Corporation’s Board of Directors to beeffective to the holders of the Corporation’s capital stock, par value$.01 per share, of record as of the close of business on December 1,2003.
          4. This amendment will not adversely affect the rights orpreferences of the holders of outstanding shares of any class or series,and will not result in a percentage of authorized shares of any class orseries that remains unissued after the combination that exceeds thepercentage of authorized shares of that class or series that wereunissued before the combination.
          5. This amendment has been adopted pursuant to Chapter 302A of theMinnesota Statutes, also called the Minnesota Business Corporation Act.
          6. This amendment shall be effective December 1, 2003.
     In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand on this 10day of November, 2003.    **ONELINK, INC.** a Minnesota corporation     Ronald E. Eibensteiner *Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary*
32