Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 20, 2009 / Notices 53701 

2The original due date for the preliminary 

results, October 31, 2009, is a Saturday. 

1Thuan Phuoc, Frozen Seafoods Factory No. 32, 

Frozen Seafoods Fty, Frozen Seafoods Factory 32, 

Seafoods and Foodstuff Factory, and My Son 

Seafood Factory. 2‘‘For a detailed explanation, see ‘‘Memorandum 

to James C. Doyle, Director, Office 9, through 

Catherine Bertrand, Program Manager, Office 9, 

from Irene Gorelik, Senior Analyst, Office 9; Certain 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Allegation of Ministerial Error 

in the Final Results of the Third Administrative 

Review,’’ dated concurrently with the signature 

date of this notice (‘‘Amended Final Memo’’). In the 

Amended Final Memo, the Department also 

addresses the ministerial error allegations brought 

by Minh Hai Export Frozen Seafood Processing 

Joint-Stock Company, Soc Trang Seafood Joint 

Stock Company, Bac Lieu Fisheries Joint Stock 

Company, and UTXI Aquatic Products Processing 

Corporation. 

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to make a preliminary 

determination in an administrative 

review within 245 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month of an order or 

finding for which a review is requested. 

Consistent with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act, the Department may extend the 

245-day period to 365 days if it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within a 245-day period. The deadline 

for the preliminary results of these 

administrative reviews is currently 

November 2, 2009.2 The Department 

determines that completion of the 

preliminary results of these reviews 

within the statutory time period is not 

practicable because we are unable to 

complete our review of the original and/ 

or supplemental questionnaire 

responses for each respondent and 

conduct verifications within the current 

timeframe. The Department thus 

requires additional time to conduct its 

analysis for each company in these 

reviews. Therefore, in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) the Act, we are 

extending the time period for issuing 

the preliminary results of these reviews 

until March 1, 2010. The final results 

continue to be due 120 days after the 

publication of the preliminary results. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: October 14, 2009. 

John M. Andersen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. E9–25185 Filed 10–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–552–802 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Amended Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On September 15, 2009, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published the final 

results and final partial rescission of the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of the antidumping duty order on 

certain frozen warmwater shrimp from 

the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 

(‘‘Vietnam’’) covering the period 

February 1, 2007, through January 31, 

2008. See Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam: Final Results and Final Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 74 FR 47191 

(September 15, 2009) (‘‘Final Results’’). 

Pursuant to section 751(h) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are 

amending the Final Results to correct a 

ministerial error in the name assigned to 

a respondent not selected for individual 

examination, Thuan Phuoc Seafoods 

and Trading Corporation, that received 

a separate rate. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 20, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–6905. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 15, 2009, Minh Hai 

Export Frozen Seafood Processing Joint– 

Stock Company, Soc Trang Seafood 

Joint Stock Company, Bac Lieu Fisheries 

Joint Stock Company, Thuan Phuoc 

Seafoods and Trading Corporation, and 

UTXI Aquatic Products Processing 

Corporation (collectively, ‘‘SR 

respondents’’) filed timely allegations, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(c)(1), that 

the Department made ministerial errors 

regarding the respective company 

names listed in the Final Results. No 

other interested parties filed ministerial 

error allegations or rebuttals to the SR 

respondents’ ministerial error 

allegation. 

The SR respondents allege that the 

Department made a ministerial error 

with respect to the names listed in the 

‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of the 

Final Results. Specifically, Soc Trang 

Seafood Joint Stock Company claims 

that the Department inadvertently 

omitted the claimed ‘‘doing–businessas’’ (‘‘dba’’) name of ‘‘STAPIMEX’’ from 

the Final Results. Thuan Phuoc 

Seafoods and Trading Corporation 

argues that its name abbreviated as 

‘‘Thuan Phuoc JSC’’ in the Final Results 

is not a dba name actually used by the 

company. Additionally, Thuan Phuoc 

Seafoods and Trading Corporation 

argues that the Department omitted six 

other dba names from the Final Results.1

UTXI Aquatic Products Processing 

Corporation argues that the Department 

made a ministerial error in the Final 

Results by omitting the following dba 

names: UTXI, UTXI Co. Ltd., Khanh Loi 

Seafood Factory, and Hoang Phuong 

Seafood Factory. Lastly, Minh Hai 

Export Frozen Seafood Processing Joint– 

Stock Company argues that the 

Department omitted the abbreviation 

‘‘Minh Hai Export–Jostoco’’ from the 

Final Results. 

Amended Final Results of Review 

A ministerial error, as defined in 

section 751(h) of the Act, includes 

‘‘errors in addition, subtraction, or other 

arithmetic function, clerical error 

resulting from inaccurate copying, 

duplication, or the like, and any other 

type of unintentional error which the 

{Secretary} considers ministerial.’’ See 

also 19 CFR 351.224(f). After analyzing 

the SR respondents’ allegations, we 

have determined, in accordance with 

section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.224(e), that the Department made a 

ministerial error in the Final Results by 

unintentionally assigning to Thuan 

Phuoc Seafoods and Trading 

Corporation an abbreviated form of its 

name, ‘‘Thuan Phuoc JSC,’’ that was not 

used by the company as a trade name.2

Therefore, we are amending the final 

results of administrative review of 

certain frozen warmwater shrimp from 

Vietnam for the period February 1, 

2007, through January 31, 2008, to 

remove ‘‘Thuan Phuoc JSC’’ as an 

abbreviation of SR respondent, Thuan 

Phuoc Seafoods and Trading 

Corporation. Although we disagree that 

we made ministerial errors with respect 

to the other allegations referenced 

above, for clarification we will include 

dba names in these amended final 

results. For further explanation of our 

reasons, see Amended Final Memo. The 

weighted–average percentage dumping 

margins have not changed from the 

Final Results for any companies: 


cprice-sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
53702 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 20, 2009 / Notices 

CERTAIN FROZEN WARMWATER SHRIMP FROM VIETNAM

Manufacturer/Exporter Weighted–Average Margin 

(Percent) 

Thuan Phuoc Seafoods and Trading Corporation3 aka,.

Frozen Seafoods Factory No. 32, aka,.

Frozen Seafoods Fty, aka,.

Thuan Phuoc, aka.

Frozen Seafoods Factory 32, aka.

Seafoods and Foodstuff Factory, aka.

My Son Seafoods Factory ..................................................................................................................................... 4.57 % 

Minh Hai Export Frozen Seafood Processing Joint Stock Company, aka.

Minh Hai Jostoco, aka.

Minh Hai Export Frozen Seafood Processing Joint–Stock Company (‘‘Minh Hai Jostoco’’), aka.

Minh Hai Export Frozen Seafood Processing Joint–Stock Company, aka.

Minh Hai Joint Stock Seafood Processing Joint–Stock Company, aka.

Minh Hai Export Frozen Seafood Processing Joint–Stock Co., aka.

Minh Hai Export Frozen Seafood Processing Joint–Stock Company Minh Hai Jostoco ...................................... 4.57 % 

Soc Trang Seafood Joint Stock Company4, aka.

STAPIMEX ............................................................................................................................................................. 4.57 % 

UTXI Aquatic Products Processing Corporation5, aka.

UTXI, aka.

UTXI Co. Ltd., aka.

UTXICO.

Khanh Loi Seafood Factory, aka.

Hoang Phuong Seafood Factory ........................................................................................................................... 4.57 % 

Vietnam–Wide Rate6 ................................................................................................................................................. 25.76 % 

3This company, via a CCR, has assumed the separate rate for the former entity and all other trade names associated with the former entity 

that had also been previously granted separate rate status. See Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Vietnam: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews, 74 FR 42050 (August 20, 2009) (‘‘Vietnam Shrimp CCR Final’’); see also Final Results and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 17. 4This company, via a CCR, has assumed the separate rate for the former entity and all other trade names associated with the former entity 

that had also been previously granted separate rate status. See Vietnam Shrimp CCR Final; see also Final Results and accompanying Issues 

and Decision Memorandum at Comment 17. 5This company, via a CCR, has assumed the separate rate for the former entity and all other trade names associated with the former entity 

that had also been previously granted separate rate status. See Vietnam Shrimp CCR Final; see also Final Results and accompanying Issues 

and Decision Memorandum at Comment 17. 6The Vietnam-wide entity includes: AAAS Logistics; Agrimex; Amerasian Shipping Logistics Corp.; American Container Line; An Giang Fisheries Import and Export Joint Stock Company (Agifish); An Xuyen; Angiang Agricultural; Technology Service Company; Aquatic Products Trading 

Company; Bentre Aquaproduct Imports & Exports; Bentre Forestry and Aquaproduct Import-Export Company (‘‘FAQUIMEX’’); Bentre Frozen 

Aquaproduct Exports; Bentre Seafood Joint Stock; Beseaco, Binh Dinh Fishery Joint Stock; Cantho Import-Export Seafood Joint Stock Company(‘‘Caseamex’’); Can Tho Import Export Fishery Limited Company (‘‘CAFISH‘‘); Ca Mau Seaproducts Exploitation and Service Corporation 

(‘‘SES’’); Camau Seafood Fty; Can Tho Seafood Exports; Cautre Enterprises; Chun Cheng Da Nang Co., Ltd.; Co Hieu; Cong Ty Do Hop Viet 

Cuong; Dao Van Manh; Dong Phuc Huynh; Dragon Waves Frozen Food Fty.; Duyen Hai Bac Lieu Company (‘‘T.K. Co.’’); Duyen Hai Foodstuffs 

Processing Factory (‘‘COSEAFEX’’); General Imports & Exports; Hacota; Hai Ha Private Enterprise; Hai Thuan Export Seaproduct Processing 

Co., Ltd. ; Hai Viet; Hai Viet Corporation (‘‘HAVICO’’); Hanoi Seaproducts Import Export Corporation (‘‘Seaprodex Hanoi’’); Seaprodex Hanoi; 

Hatrang Frozen Seaproduct Fty; Hoa Nam Marine Agricultural; Hoan An Fishery; Hoan Vu Marine Product Co., Ltd.; Hua Heong Food Ind Vietnam; Khanh Loi Trading; Kien Gang Sea Products Import - Export Company (Kisimex); Kien Gang Seaproduct Import and Export Company 

(‘‘KISIMEX’’); Konoike Vinatrans Logistics; Lamson Import-Export Foodstuffs Corporation; Long An Food Processing Export Joint Stock Company 

(‘‘LAFOOCO’’); Lucky Shing; Nam Hai; Nha Trang Company Limited; Nha Trang Fisheries Co. Ltd.; Pataya Food Industry (Vietnam) Ltd.; Phat 

Loc Seafood; Phung Hung Private Business; Saigon Orchide; Sea Product; Sea Products Imports & Exports; Seafood Company Zone II 

(‘‘Thusaco2’’); Seafood Processing Joint Stock Company No.9 (previously Seafood Processing Imports Exports); Seafoods and Foodstuff Factory; Seaprodex; Seaprodex Quang Tri; Sonacos; Song Huong ASC Import-Export Company Ltd.; Song Huong ASC Joint Stock Company; Special Aquatic Products Joint Stock Company (‘‘Seaspimex’’); SSC; T & T Co., Ltd.; Tacvan Frozen Seafoods Processing Export Company; Thami 

Shipping & Airfreight; Thang Long; Thanh Long; Thanh Doan Seaproducts Import; Thien Ma Seafood; Tourism Material and Equipment Company 

(Matourimex Hochiminh City Branch); Truc An Company; Trung Duc Fisheries Private Enterprise; V N Seafoods; Vien Thang Private Enterprise; 

Viet Nhan Company; Vietfracht Can Tho; Vietnam Northern Viking Technologie Co.; Vietnam Northern Viking Technology Co. Ltd.; Vietnam 

Tomec Co., Ltd.; Vilfood Co.; and Vita. 

Assessment Rate 

The Department will determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries based 

on the amended final results. For details 

on the assessment of antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries, see 

Final Results. The Department intends 

to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of the 

amended final results of the 

administrative review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit rates will be 

effective retroactively on any entries 

made on or after September 15, 2009, 

the date of publication of the Final 

Results, for all shipments of certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from Vietnam 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

exporters listed above, the cash deposit 

rate will be established in these 

amended final results of review (except, 

if the rate is zero or de minimis, i.e., less 

than 0.5 percent, a zero cash deposit 

rate will be required for that company); 

(2) for previously investigated or 

reviewed Vietnamese and non– 

Vietnamese exporters not listed above 

that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter–specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) for all 

Vietnamese exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the 

Vietnamese–wide rate of 25.76 percent; 

and (4) for all non–Vietnamese 


cprice-sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 20, 2009 / Notices 53703 

1See Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duties Pursuant to Sections 701 

and 731 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Amended: 

Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality 

Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fred Presses from the 

People’s Republic of China, dated September 23, 

2009 (‘‘Petition’’). 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the Vietnamese exporters 

that supplied that non–Vietnamese 

exporter. These deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred, and in the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification of Interested Parties 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during the review period. Pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.402(f)(3), failure to comply 

with this requirement could result in 

the Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO as explained in 

the administrative protective order 

itself. Timely written notification of the 

return/destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: October 13, 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E9–25209 Filed 10–19–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(C–570–959) 

Certain Coated Paper Suitable for 

High–Quality Print Graphics Using 

Sheet–Fed Presses from the People’s 

Republic of China: Initiation of 

Countervailing Duty Investigation 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 20, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Yasmin Nair and Joseph Shuler, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3813 and (202) 

482–1293, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Petition 

On September 23, 2009, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) received a petition filed 

in proper form by Appleton Coated LLC, 

NewPage Corporation, S.D. Warren 

Company d/b/a Sappi Fine Paper North 

America, and the United Steel, Paper 

and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, 

Energy, Allied Industrial and Service 

Workers International Union 

(collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’), domestic 

producers of certain coated paper 

suitable for high–quality print graphics 

using sheet–fed presses (‘‘coated 

paper’’).1 In response to the 

Department’s requests, Petitioners 

provided timely information 

supplementing the Petition on October 

2, 2009, and October 6, 2009. 

In accordance with section 702(b)(1) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(‘‘the Act’’), Petitioners allege that 

manufacturers, producers, or exporters 

of coated paper in the People’s Republic 

of China (‘‘PRC’’) receive 

countervailable subsidies within the 

meaning of section 701 of the Act, and 

that such imports are materially 

injuring, or threatening material injury 

to, an industry in the United States. 

The Department finds that Petitioners 

filed the Petition on behalf of the 

domestic industry because they are 

interested parties as defined in section 

771(9)(C) and (D) of the Act, and 

Petitioners have demonstrated sufficient 

industry support with respect to the 

countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) 

investigation (see ‘‘Determination of 

Industry Support for the Petition’’ 

section below). 

Period of Investigation 

The period of investigation is January 

1, 2008, through December 31, 2008. 

Scope of Investigation 

The products covered by the 

investigation are coated paper products 

from the PRC. For a full description of 

the scope of the investigation, please see 

‘‘Scope of Investigation,’’ in Appendix I 

of this notice. 

Comments on Scope of Investigation 

During our review of the Petition, we 

discussed the scope with Petitioners to 

ensure that it is an accurate reflection of 

the products for which the domestic 

industry is seeking relief. Moreover, as 

discussed in the preamble to the 

Department’s regulations (Antidumping 

Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final 

Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 

1997)), we are setting aside a period for 

interested parties to raise issues 

regarding product coverage. The 

Department encourages all interested 

parties to submit such comments by 

November 2, 2009, twenty calendar days 

from the signature date of this notice. 

Comments should be addressed to 

Import Administration’s APO/Dockets 

Unit, Room 1870, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. 

The period of the scope consultations is 

intended to provide the Department 

with ample opportunity to consider all 

comments and to consult with parties 

prior to the issuance of the preliminary 

determination. 

Consultations 

Pursuant to section 702(b)(4)(A)(ii) of 

the Act, on September 23, 2009, the 

Department invited representatives of 

the Government of the PRC (‘‘GOC’’) for 

consultations with respect to the CVD 

petition. The GOC did not request such 

consultations, however, on October 13, 

2009, the GOC’s Ministry of Commerce 

submitted to the United States Embassy 

in Beijing, China comments pertaining 

to the Petition. 

Determination of Industry Support for 

the Petition 

Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires 

that a petition be filed on behalf of the 

domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) 

of the Act provides that a petition meets 

this requirement if the domestic 

producers or workers who support the 


cprice-sewell on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES