alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 1 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the two Houses of Congress shall meet in the Hall of the House of 
Representatives on Thursday, the sixth day of January 2005, at 1 
o'clock post meridian, pursuant to the requirements of the Constitution 
and laws relating to the election of President and Vice President of 
the United States, and the President of the Senate shall be their 
Presiding Officer; that two tellers shall be previously appointed by 
the President of the Senate on the part of the Senate and two by the 
Speaker on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be 
handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the 
certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral 
votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and 
acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the 
letter ``A''; and said tellers, having then read the same in the 
presence and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes 
as they shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes having 
been ascertained and counted in the manner and according to the rules 
by law provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the 
President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the 
vote, which announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of 
the persons, if any, elected President and Vice President of the United 
States, and, together with a list of the votes, be entered on the 
Journals of the two Houses.

            Passed the Senate January 4, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. CON. RES. 1

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To provide for the counting on January 6, 2005, of the electoral votes 
         for President and Vice President of the United States.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,555
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                       630
<INVENTORY>                                        443
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,422
<PP&E>                                         542,827
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 580,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,075
<BONDS>                                        174,204
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              305
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,489
<OTHER-SE>                                     236,208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   580,359
<SALES>                                         74,015
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,015
<CGS>                                           54,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,949
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,074
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,032
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,923
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
#### DONG RONG YANG, Petitioner, v. *37Eric H. HOLDER Jr.,1 United States Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-4558-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 6, 2009.

Thomas V. Massucci, New York, N.Y., for Petitioner.

Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Greg D. Mack, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

PRESENT: Hon. JON 0. NEWMAN, Hon. PIERRE N. LEVAL and Hon. RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

1

. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. is automatically substituted for former Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey as respondent in this case.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Petitioner Dong Rong Yang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of an August 22, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the November 7, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Noel A. Ferris denying Yang’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). *In re Dong Rong Yang,*No. [ AXX XXX XXX ] (B.I.A. Aug. 22, 2008), *aff'g*No. [ AXX XXX XXX ] (Immig. Ct. N.Y. City Nov. 7, 2006). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history in this case.

Based on the thorough and well reasoned opinion of the Board of Immigration appeals, the petition for review is DENIED. As we have completed our review, any stay of removal that the Court previously granted in this petition is VACATED, and any pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DISMISSED as moot. Any pending request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and Second Circuit Local Rule 34(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2708 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2708

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 194.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Whitehouse (for himself and Mr. Reed) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 194.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 194.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Butanamide, N-(2,3- Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        dihydro-2-oxo-1H-                                                  31/2011.......
                        benzimidazol-5-
                        yl)-2-[2-(2-
                        methoxyphenyl)dia
                        zenyl]-3-oxo]
                        (CAS No. 82199-12-
                        0) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        3204.17.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
****
 **EXHIBIT
32**
 
 **STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of China Digital Media
Corporation (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Daniel Ng, Chief Executive Officer, and Lui Chi Keung, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 *
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates
and for the periods presented.
   ****Date: May
      16, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Daniel
      NgDaniel NgDirector,
      President and Chief Executive Officer
  ****Date: May
      16, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Lui
      Chi KeungLui Chi KeungDirector
      and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-20403

Summary Calendar

____________

Wayne Smith, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

David Hittner; MTGLQ Investors, L.P.; Brandon 

Hakari; Charles Eskridge; Sam S. Shelton; Clare I. 

Cougill; Marilyn Burgess, 

Defendants—Appellees.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CV-3079

______________________________

Before Clement, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Wayne Smith appeals the dismissal of his case under Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). “We review de novo the grant of a Rule 12(b)(6) 

motion to dismiss.” Lampton v. Diaz, 639 F.3d 223, 225 (5th Cir. 2011) 

(citation omitted). Having reviewed the briefs and the record, we find Smith 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 18, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-20403 Document: 00516715725 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/18/2023
No. 22-20403

2

hasn’t shown that he stated a claim upon which relief can be granted. See 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). So, we AFFIRM and all pending motions are 

DENIED.

Case: 22-20403 Document: 00516715725 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/18/2023
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50289

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 30, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Richard Clark appeals the 51-month sentence imposed following a remand for resentencing in light of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Clark pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography. He contends that his sentence was unreasonable in light of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Clark contends that the district court imposed an unreasonable sentence by failing to give appropriate consideration to his attempts at obtaining treatment before his incarceration and his inability to obtain treatment in prison.

Clark’s sentence was within a properly calculated advisory guideline range and is presumed reasonable. *See United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006). Such a sentence is given “great deference,” and we infer that the sentencing court considered all the factors for a fair sentence. *See United States v. Smith,*440 F.3d 704, 707 (5th Cir.2006). We conclude that Clark has failed to rebut the presumption that his sentence, which was at the bottom of the applicable range under the Sentencing Guidelines, was reasonable. *See Alonzo,*435 F.3d at 554-55. Consequently, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Order entered September 17, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00503-CV

GWENDOLYN GABRIEL, Appellant

V.

MERRY OUTLAW, Appellee

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-02456

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s September 13, 2018 unopposed second motion for 

extension of time to file brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later 

than October 19, 2018. We caution that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Plastic 

Terminal covered with tape

if plastic cover missing

SpacerIf space

togethe

prevent 

to the s

WARNING – Follow 4150 Transportation Instructions ‐ WAR

1. Ensure battery terminals are covered during transportation.

2. If plastic terminal covers are missing cover terminals with tape to prevent shorts

3. If spacer separating batteries is loose, secure batteries together with fiber tape t

movement and place the spacer to the side.

4. Do not transport if foam is damaged or missing.

5. Keep all foreign items out of the kit such as tools or stakes.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2746 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2746

 To address the concept of ``Too Big To Fail'' with respect to certain 
                          financial entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 5, 2009

  Mr. Sanders introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To address the concept of ``Too Big To Fail'' with respect to certain 
                          financial entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Too Big to Fail, Too Big to Exist 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON INSTITUTIONS THAT ARE TOO BIG TO FAIL.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later than 90 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury 
shall submit to Congress a list of all commercial banks, investment 
banks, hedge funds, and insurance companies that the Secretary believes 
are too big to fail (in this Act referred to as the ``Too Big to Fail 
List'').

SEC. 3. BREAKING-UP TOO BIG TO FAIL INSTITUTIONS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, beginning 1 year after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
break up entities included on the Too Big To Fail List, so that their 
failure would no longer cause a catastrophic effect on the United 
States or global economy without a taxpayer bailout.

SEC. 4. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``Too Big to Fail'' means any 
entity that has grown so large that its failure would have a 
catastrophic effect on the stability of either the financial system or 
the United States economy without substantial Government assistance.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<MULTIPLIER>       1

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                         58,916
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  16,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               75,019
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 75,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          80,242
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                   52,044,501
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   75,019
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   9,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (9,692)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (9,692)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (9,692)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0




</TABLE>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-88,508-01

EX P ARTE BENJAMIN MARTINEZ HUERTA, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR18465-A INTHE 271S T DIST RICT COURT

F ROM WISE COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag gravated sexual assault of a

child, and he w as sentenc ed to forty year s in prison. Applicant alleg es that his tria l c ounsel provided ineffe ctive assistance , rende ring his guilty plea invo l u n t ary , an d he has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). There is no response from trial counsel in the rec ord provided to this Court, and there are no finding s from the trial court. In these c ircumstance s, additional fac ts are ne eded. A s we he ld in Ex-2-

p a r t e Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appro p ri at e forum for finding s of fa ct. The trial court shall order t ri al co u n sel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffe ctive assistance by explaining counsel’s repr esentation of Applicant, including applicable st ra t egy and tactica l decisions. To obtain the re sponse, the trial c ourt may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hearing, it sha ll de termine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant at the hearing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law reg arding the claims raised in the writ application. The trial court may also make any other finding s of fac t a nd conclusions of law it deems rele vant and appropriate to the dispositi on of Applicant’s claim for habea s corpus relief

. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental t ra n s cript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of the court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwa rded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order

. Any extensions of time shall be obtained fr om this C ourt. Filed: June 20, 2018 Do not publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, March 18, 2009.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227, or (206) 220-6098.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, March 18, 2009, at 2 p.m. Pacific Time. You can submit written comments to the panel by faxing the comments to 206-220-5760, or write to Janice Spinks, TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Janice Spinks. Ms. Spinks can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

Dated: January 13, 2009.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E9-1274 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P