alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2640 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain nonwoven polypropylene zippered 

sleeping bag carry cases, not under 77.5 cm in circumference and not 

exceeding 106.7 cm in circumference. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SESSIONS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain nonwoven polypropylene zippered sleeping bag carry cases, not under 

77.5 cm in circumference and not exceeding 106.7 cm 

in circumference. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN NONWOVEN POLYPROPYLENE SLEEP4 ING BAG CARRY CASES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2640 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Sleeping bag carry cases imported separately from sleeping bags, with a body of 

nonwoven polypropylene and 

a top of nonwoven polyester, 

and with a zipper running 

completely around the perimeter sealing the top to the 

body, not under 77.5 cm in 

circumference and not exceeding 106.7 cm in circumference, valued not over $1 

(provided for in subheading 

6307.90.98) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NPS
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. certify that the Annual Report of NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|Date: March 11, 2010 | /s/ FRANCOIS NADER
                      Francois NaderPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: March 11, 2010 | /s/ LUKE M. BESHAR
                      Luke M. Beshar Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and will be retained by NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Gregory W. Collins, Claimant, v Dukes Plumbing and Sewer Service, Inc., Appellant, et al., Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Submitted January 31, 2011;

decided February 10, 2011

*753Motion by New York State AFL/CIO for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Three copies of the brief must be served and an original and 24 copies filed within seven days.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2531 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain women’s 

footwear, valued over $23/pair, covering the ankle, with a coated or 

laminated textile fabric. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Ms. CANTWELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty 

on certain women’s footwear, valued over $23/pair, covering the ankle, with a coated or laminated textile fabric. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN’S FOOTWEAR, VALUED OVER 

4 $23/PAIR, COVERING THE ANKLE, WITH A 

5 COATED OR LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRIC. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.75 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 certain women’s footwear, valued over $23/pair, covering 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2531 IS

1 the ankle, with a coated or laminated textile fabric) is 

2 amended— 

3 (1) by striking ‘‘$20/pair’’ and inserting ‘‘$23/ 

4 pair’’; and 

5 (2) by striking the date in the effective column 

6 period and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

9 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

10 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### MARTIN v. N. V. NEDERLANDSCHE AMERIKAANSCHE STOOMVAART MAATCHAPPIJ et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Sept. 24, 1948.

Abraham M. Fisch, of New York City (Sidney Schiffman, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff. . ...

George A. Garvey, of New York *City,*for defendant.

KAUFMAN, District Judge.

The plaintiff was injured while in the employ of the Jarka Corporation on a pier owned by the defendants. In aid of his suit for damages brought against defendants, plaintiff made two motions here. One of these sought the inspection of a hoisting block located on the pier where the accident occurred. This motion was opposed on the ground that the defendants had leased the pier to the Jarka Corporation and had therefore surrendered all control over the premises and the block. It appeared from the argument, however, that the Jarka Corporation operated the pier as agents for the defendants and the motion for' inspection of the hoisting block was accordingly granted.

The second motion requests the inspection of a report made on behalf of the Indemnity Insurance Company of North America by Edward J. Vánderman of Sam Tour & Co., consulting engineers, in which the hoisting block was examined and surveyed after the accident occurred. Defendants urge that since the report was had at the instance of the Indemnity Insurance Company for and on behalf of the Jarka Corporation, not a party to this action, plaintiff is not entitled to its inspection under Rule 34, Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.-

The Indemnity Insurance Company not only is the insurer of the Jarka Corporation, but of -the defendants as well. Attorney for the defendants herein is also the lawyer of the insurer. It is clear that he. possesses a copy of the report, .The decisions under the Federal Rules allow full use of the discovery procedure to obtain information independently garnered by áñ *364insurer, which find their way into possession of opposing counsel. Kane v. News Syndicate Company, D.C., 1 F.R.D. 738; Bough v. Lee, D.C., 29 F.Supp. 498; Price v. Levitt, D.C., 29 F.Supp. 164; Colpak v. Hetterick, 40 F.Supp. 350; Blank v. Great Northern Ry. Co., D.C., 4 F.R.D. 213. The plaintiff’s motion is granted.

Settle order on notice.
#### Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana et al., Appellants, v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Respondent. Marc S. Kirschner, as Trustee of the Refco Litigation Trust, Appellant, v KPMG LLP et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Submitted August 2, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

Motion by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on consideration of the certified questions herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August 15, 2011 | /s/ George Carpenter                                  |   |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                             | George Carpenter                                      |
|                             | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                             |                                                  |   |
|                             | /s/ Paul Buck                                         |   |
|                             | Paul Buck                                             |
|                             | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |

----
#### In the Matter of Diane Word, Appellant, v Superintendent of Bedford Hills Correctional Facility et al., Respondents.

Decided September 22, 2009

Reported below, 2009 NY Slip Op 73917(U).

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          17
<RECEIVABLES>                                  705
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,488
<CURRENT ASSETS>                             4,520
<PP&E>                                       5,381
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,843
<BONDS>                                      5,858
<COMMON>                                        30
<OTHER-SE>                                     416
<SALES>                                      3,413
<TOTAL-REVENUE>                              5,090
<CGS>                                          986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,260
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,285
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (846)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (312)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (533)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (533)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.12)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-03865, 333-22943, 333-45991, 333-73201)and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-66980, 33-86230, 333-01874, 333-28717, 333-60321,333-62576, 333-70354, 333-82879, 333-88114) of Action Performance Companies,Inc. of our report dated November 5, 2002 relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in thisForm 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
#### Tai CHENG CHEN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-74376.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 2006 *.

Filed Dec. 8, 2006.

Alexander K. Yu, Esq., Law Office of Alexander K. Yu, New York, NY, for Petitioner.

Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, *703CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David F. Shuey, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Environmental & Natural Resources, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Tai Cheng Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ’s”) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012,*1015 (9th Cir.2003). We grant in part and deny in part the petition for review, and remand for further proceedings.

The IJ found Chen’s testimony was not credible. On appeal, the BIA made “no determination” on Chen’s credibility and denied relief solely on the merits. Chen testified that, while he and his parents were out working, the police came by their home to arrest them for practicing Falun Gong, and that the police have looked for him and his parents at their home and at his sister’s home since he entered the United States. The State Department document in the record indicated that the Chinese government had subjected Falun Gong practitioners who refused to recant to harsh treatment. Aecordingly, the record compels the conclusion that Chen has established a well-founded fear of future persecution. *See Zhou v. Gonzales,*437 F.3d 860, 867-69 (9th Cir.2006); *Zhang v. Ashcroft,*388 F.3d 713 (9th Cir. 2004).

With regard to withholding of removal, however, the record does not compel the finding that it is more probable than not that Chen would be persecuted upon return to China. *See Hoxha v. Ashcroft,*319 F.3d 1179, 1185 (9th Cir.2003).

We remand to the BIA to consider the IJ’s adverse credibility finding. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16-17, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam); *Briones v. INS,*175 F.3d 727, 730 (9th Cir.1999) (en banc).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED in part; DENIED in part; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2508 

To reduce temporarily the duty on 4–ADPA. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on 4–ADPA. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4–ADPA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.00.01 4-Aminodiphenylamine (CAS No. 

101–54–2) (provided for in subheading 2921.51.50) .......................... 3.6% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 

’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2508 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Events 
-  Multimedia Library 

# NIDCD Clinician-Scientists (R25) Training Webinar

Share this on: 

During a live webinar recorded on Tuesday, October 26, 2021, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) Extramural Research Training Officer Alberto Rivera-Rentas, Ph.D., discussed R25 funding initiatives designed to foster the development of the NIDCD’s clinician-scientist workforce. The webinar also included a question and answer session.

## Embed this multimedia on your website

Copy and paste this code to embed the content in your website, blog, or other distribution channels. Information on our website is in the public domain, but we appreciate when you link to the source and when credit is given to the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xA_dWwKlTS0" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe><p>During a live webinar recorded on Tuesday, October 26, 2021, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) Extramural Research Training Officer Alberto Rivera-Rentas, Ph.D., discussed R25 funding initiatives designed to foster the development of the NIDCD’s clinician-scientist workforce. The webinar also included a question and answer session.</p>

December 3, 2021

## Media Inquiries

Contact the NIDCD press office at news@nidcd.nih.gov.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-18945) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended, and the Amended and Restated Directors Stock Option Plan and
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-90524) pertaining to the 2002 Stock
Option Plan of Redhook Ale Brewery, Incorporated of our report dated January 24,
2003 with respect to the financial statements of Redhook Ale Brewery,
Incorporated included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2002.


                                                      ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Seattle, Washington
March 28, 2003
#### In the Matter of Regal Entertainment Group, Respondent, v New York State Division of Human Rights, Respondent, and Doudou B. Janneh, Appellant. (And Another Related Proceeding.)

Submitted October 26, 2009;

decided December 15, 2009

Reported below, 61 AD3d 1102.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR) § 500.22 (b) (2). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
EX-10.4



 





Exhibit 10.4




AMENDMENT TO

BOB EVANS FARMS, INC. AND AFFILIATES

2002 SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN




     WHEREAS, Bob Evans Farms, Inc. (“Corporation”) maintains the Bob Evans Farms, Inc.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“Plan”), as amended from time to time, to provide deferred
and incentive compensation to a select group of its management or highly compensated employees;



     WHEREAS, capitalized terms that are not defined in this Amendment have the same meanings as in
the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan to utilize certain transition relief that
(1) allows changes in the time and form of payments of amounts deferred under the Plan which are
subject to Code §409A and guidance issued with respect thereto and (2) is described in guidance
issued by the Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department with respect to Code §409A;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2006, as follows:




“Notwithstanding any terms of the Plan to the contrary, solely for the purpose of elections
as to the time and form of distribution of benefits under the Plan which are subject to
Code §409A, the Plan shall allow Members to make changes to the time and/or form of
distribution of such benefits in calendar year 2006 and calendar year 2007, as permitted by
the transition relief provided in IRS Notice 2006-79, IRS Notice 2007-86 and the applicable
Treasury Regulations.”



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is adopted this 14th day of November, 2007.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	BOB EVANS FARMS, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
#### Louise JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 08-2297.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 8, 2009.

Decided: May 26, 2009.

Louise Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Kent Pendleton Porter, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Louise Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Johnson v. Astrue,*No. 2:08-cv00091-RAJ-FBS (E.D.Va. Sept. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *234materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 10.2

PROMISSORY NOTE 

IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 50,000




December 28, 2006




Silver Springs, NV




For value received, Pioneer Consulting Corp of Silver Springs, Nevada does hereby promise to pay to the order of Matthew Marcus at Orange County, CA  five years after the above date the sum of $50,000 with interest at the rate of no interest annually or prepayment penalty.







Maker:  Pioneer Consulting Group, Inc.




___________________

/s/ Matthew Marcus

---------------------------------

Matthew Marcus, CEO
EXHIBIT 21.1

THORNBURG MORTGAGE, INC.

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                             |  |                      
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Name                                         |  | State ofIncorporation
|Thornburg Mortgage Home Loans, Inc.          |  | Delaware             
|                                             | 
|Thornburg Mortgage Acceptance Corporation II |  | Delaware             
|                                             | 
|Thornburg Mortgage Funding Corporation II    |  | Delaware             
|                                             | 
|Thornburg Mortgage Hedging Strategies, Inc.  |  | Delaware             
|                                             | 
|Thornburg Mortgage Depositor, L.L.C.         |  | Delaware             
|                                             | 
|Thornburg Mortgage Capital Resources, LLC    |  | Delaware