alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification**I, Stephen J. Hansbrough, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HearUSA, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis l report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluations; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 15, 2007   /s/ Stephen J. Hansbrough   Stephen J. Hansbrough   Chief Executive Officer
_________________

_________________ 1 Cite as: 55 5 U
. S. ____ (2008) S TEVENS , J ., co ncu rrin g 

## SUPREME CO URT O FTHE UNI TED STATES
No. 08A4 71 ELDON VA IL, SECR E TARY OF WASHIN GTON

DEPARTM E NT OF C O RR ECTI O NS, ET AL . v. D ARO LD R. J. S T E N SO N ON APPLICATION TO VACATE STAY OF EXECUTION [Dec ember3, 200 8] The application to vacate the sta yof execution of sen tence of death entered by the United States District Cour t for the Eastern District of Washi n gton on November 25, 2008, presented to Justice Kennedy and b yhi m referred to the Court, is granted. J USTICE S T EVEN S , wit hwhom J USTICE G INSBURGjoins , concurring. On Novem b er 21, 2008, the Thurston County Superio r Court denied respondent’s mo tion for a preliminary in

junction th at would ha ve prev ente d the State from execut

ing respondent until the court considered respondent’s constitutional challeng e to the State’s lethal injection protocol. Rebuffed by the state court, respondent immedi

ately filed an identical consti tutional challenge under Rev. Stat. §1979, 42 U. S. C. §1983, in the United States Dis

trict Cour tfor the E a stern District of Washington and moved for a preliminary injunc tion. The Di strict Cour t concluded that a sta yo f execution was wa rran t ed to allow the state co urt sufficient time to f u lly and fairly consider the merits of respondent’s cons titutional claim. In my view, the entry of the stay wa s improper. The state court decided under state law that the execution could proceed while respondent’s constitutional claim was pendi n g. Accordin gly , the District Cou rt sh ould not have entered a2 VAIL v. STEN SO N S TEVENS , J ., co ncu rrin g stay to give the state court ad ditional time it decided wa s not warran t ed. In light of that procedural error, and on that basis alone, I vote to grant the application to vacate the stay of execution entered by t h e District Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                        $962,000
<SECURITIES>                                  $826,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               $2,404,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 $2,710,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $7,432,000
<PP&E>                                      $3,155,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $11,137,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       $1,804,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        $1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  $9,227,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,137,000
<SALES>                                     $3,920,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            $3,920,000
<CGS>                                       $1,905,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               $1,905,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            $1,650,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $10,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               $365,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   $30,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           $335,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  $335,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.21
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1390
ROBERT VAN BUREN, for himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. WALMART, INC., trading as Sam’s Club , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Deborah K. Chasanow , Senior District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv - 00911

- DKC )

Submitted : May 28, 2021 Decided: August 10, 2021

Before DIAZ, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Scott C. Borison, BORISON FIRM, LLC, San Mateo, California; Robert Persante, PERSANTEZUROWESTE, P.A., Clearwater, Florida; Peter A. Holland, Emanwel J. Turnbu ll, THE HOLLAND LAW FIRM, P.C., Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Dominic E. Draye, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Van Buren, who brought the underlying action against Walmart, Inc. , trading

as Sam’s Club (“Walmart”) , alleging claims under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law §§ 13

- 101 to 13

- 501 , and state law claims for negligent misrepresentation and fraud , appeals the district court’s order granting Walmart’s motion to dismiss

. We have reviewed the record and conclude that Van Buren failed to adequately allege his claims. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009) (“[W] here the well

pleaded facts do not permit t he court to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct, the complaint has alleged

— but it has not shown

— that the pleader is entitled to relief.” (brackets and internal quotation marks omitted) ; see also Francis v. Giacomelli , 588 F.3d 186, 193 (4th Cir. 2009) ( “ [N] aked assertions of wrongdoing necessitate some factual enhancement within the complaint to cross the line between possibility and plausibility of entitlement to relief.” (internal quotation marks omitted) ).
W e the refore affirm the district court ’s order

. See Van Buren v. Walmart, Inc. , No.
1:19

- cv - 00911

- DKC ( D. Md. Mar. 5, 2020 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2615 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on C12–18 alkenes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on C12–18 

alkenes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. C12–18 ALKENES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.14 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 C12–18 alkenes) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2615 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
# Correction to Mercedes-Benz Request for Extension of Priority Group 5 Sufficient Supply and Remedy Launch Deadline

                                                                          Download file:                       Correction to Mercedes-Benz Request for Extension of Priority Group 5 Sufficient Supply and Remedy Launch Deadline
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2747 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2747

 To amend the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 to provide 
consistent and reliable authority for, and for the funding of, the land 
 and water conservation fund to maximize the effectiveness of the fund 
            for future generations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 6, 2009

  Mr. Bingaman (for himself and Mr. Baucus) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 to provide 
consistent and reliable authority for, and for the funding of, the land 
 and water conservation fund to maximize the effectiveness of the fund 
            for future generations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Land and Water Conservation 
Authorization and Funding Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT AUTHORIZATION; FULL FUNDING.

    (a) Purposes.--The purposes of the amendments made by subsection 
(b) are--
            (1) to provide consistent and reliable authority for, and 
        for the funding of, the land and water conservation fund 
        established under section 2 of the Land and Water Conservation 
        Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l-5); and
            (2) to maximize the effectiveness of the fund for future 
        generations.
    (b) Amendments.--
            (1) Permanent authorization.--Section 2 of the Land and 
        Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l-5) is 
        amended--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subsection (a), by 
                striking ``During the period ending September 30, 2015, 
                there'' and inserting ``There''; and
                    (B) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ``through 
                September 30, 2015''.
            (2) Full funding.--Section 3 of the Land and Water 
        Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l-6) is amended to 
        read as follows:

``SEC. 3. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.

    ``Monies covered into the fund under section 2 shall be available 
for expenditure to carry out the purposes of this Act, without further 
appropriation.''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2652 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on calcium chloride phosphate 

phosphor. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on calcium 

chloride phosphate phosphor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CALCIUM CHLORIDE PHOSPHATE PHOSPHOR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.70 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 calcium chloride phosphate phosphor) is amended by strik7 ing the date in the effective period column and inserting 

8 ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2652 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1
 Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluations; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Stephen J. HansbroughStephen J. Hansbrough

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 24.1

                            SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,  that the  undersigned  constitutes and appoints
Vince  Hren his true and  lawful  attorney-in-fact  and agent with full power of
substitution  and  resubstitution,  for him/her and in his/her name,  place, and
stead, in any and all capacities,  to sign the Annual Report on Form 10K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, for filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by Microtest, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all
amendments to such Form 10K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and
all  documents  in  connection  therewith,  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  granting to such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them,
full  power  and  authority  to do and  perform  each and  every  act and  thing
requisite and  necessary to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming  all that such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or each of them,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


DATED: 3/26/99

                                                  /s/  Dianne C. Walker
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Dianne C. Walker
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26394-26395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12697]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1141-000]


JP Morgan Commodities Canada Corporation; Supplemental Notice 
That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket 
Section 204 Authorization

May 22, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
JP Morgan Commodities Canada Corporation's application for market-based 
rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR

[[Page 26395]]

Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the Applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is June 11, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b0d0e190804252722252e183e3b3b24393f0b2d2e3928652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95d3d0c7d6dafbf9fcfbf0c6e0e5e5fae7e1d5f3f0e7f6bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a> 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12697 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 11.1

                                 WORLDTEX, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Years Ended December 31
                                          ---------------------------------------
                                             1996          1995          1994
                                          -----------   -----------   -----------

<S>                                       <C>                 <C>           <C>
Net income                                $    10,946         5,252         5,810
                                          ===========   ===========   ===========
Shares:

     Weighted average number of shares
         outstanding                       14,463,173    14,475,571    14,583,147

     Assumed exercise of options              205,884        90,995        56,190
                                          -----------   -----------   -----------
     Total average number of common and
         common equivalent shares used
         for primary computation           14,669,057    14,566,566    14,639,337
                                          ===========   ===========   ===========

Primary earnings per share (1)            $       .75           .36           .40
                                          ===========   ===========   ===========
Shares:

     Weighted average number of shares
         outstanding                       14,463,173    14,475,571    14,583,147
                                          ===========   ===========   ===========

     Assumed exercise of options              506,671       115,576             -
                                          -----------   -----------   -----------
     Total average number of common and
         common equivalent shares used
         for fully diluted computation    14,969,844    14,591,147    14,583,147
                                          ===========   ===========   ===========

Fully diluted earnings per share(2)       $       .73           .36           .40
                                          ===========   ===========   ===========

<FN>
----------

(1)  Earnings per share are calculated based upon the weighted average number of
     common shares outstanding and common equivalent shares during the year.

(2)  Fully  diluted  earnings  per  share  calculations  result  in less than 3%
     reduction and are  accordingly  not considered as dilution in the financial
     statements.
</FN>
</TABLE>