alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2525 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain men’s 

footwear, valued over $23/pair, with a coated or laminated textile fabric. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Ms. CANTWELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty 

on certain men’s footwear, valued over $23/pair, with 

a coated or laminated textile fabric. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN’S FOOTWEAR, VALUED OVER $23/ 

4 PAIR, WITH A COATED OR LAMINATED TEX5 TILE FABRIC. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.77 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 certain men’s footwear, valued over $23/pair, with a coat9 ed or laminated textile fabric) is amended— 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2525 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘$20/pair’’ and inserting ‘‘$23/ 

2 pair’’; and 

3 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

4 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

7 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank C. Condella, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Frank C. Condella, Jr.


Frank C. Condella, Jr.


President and Chief Executive Officer


December 28, 2010
#### Gailey v. Triangle Billiards *&*Blues Club, Inc.

Case below: 179 N.C. App. 848

No. 611P06

1. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. 7A-31 (COA06-327)

2. Pit’s Motion to Dismiss “Petition for Discretionary Review”

1. Denied 06/27/07

2. Dismissed as Moot 06/27/07
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Howard Thomson, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Terrace Ventures Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                          

| | By:    | /s/
      Howard Thomson   
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | HOWARD THOMSON             
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | December 20, 2010          



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Secretary of State
                                       Division Of Corporations
                                   Delivered 05:35 FM 05/19/2005
                                   FILED 05:14 PM 05/19-2005
                                  SRV 050415334  -  3863714 FILE


                       STATE of DELAWARE
                   CERTIFICATE of AMENDMENT
                 CERTIFICATE of INCORPORATION


First:     That a meeting of the Board of Directors of ALFA
INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS CORP., resolutions were adopted setting
forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation
of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and
calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation for
consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed
amendment is as follows:

Resolved, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this
corporation be amended by changing the Article thereof numbered
4; so that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as
follows:

"The Corporation shall be authorized to change the common stock
--------------------------------------------------------------
as follows:
-----------

50,000,000 common shares at .001 par value
-------------------------------------------
1,000,000 preferred shares at .001 par value"
--------------------------------------------

Second:     That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board
of Directors, a special meeting of the stockholders of said
corporation was duly called and held upon notice in accordance
with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the state of
Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as
required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

Third: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.

Fourth: That the capital of said corporation shall not be reduced
under or by reason of said amendment.





                              By: /s/ Frank J. Drohan
                                  -------------------
                                   Frank J. Drohan
1 T he Court this day abated appellant’s pro se appeal in companion ca se 07-05 -

0379-CR, trial courtn umber 50,573-C, a nd remanded the cause for appointment of c ounse l to represent him in his ch allenge to t he trial cour t’s order r

evoking community supervis ion and sentenci ng him to tw o years i n a state jail facility and a $2,000 fine. NO. 07-05-0383-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A NOVEMBER 3, 2005

______________________________ JAMAAL DONTE MAYES, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 2 51ST DI STRICT COURT OF PO TTER CO UNTY; NO. 50,884-C; HONORABLE PATRICK A. PIRTLE, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPIN ION Appellant

Jamaal Donte Mayes, by appointed coun sel, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s judgment finding him not guilty in cause number 50,884-C. 1 The trial court2 But see T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)( 2) (prov iding that acertificati on shall be enter ed in every case in which the trial court enters a judgment of gui lt or other appealable order). 2 executed a certification of defendant’s rig ht of appeal indicat ing there w as no right

of appeal from the not g uilty j udgment. 2 The notice of appeal fil ed by appointed counsel bears the trial court cause nu mber of the judgment findi ng appellant n ot guilty
. Rule 25.2(a) (2) of the TexasRules of Appellate Procedure authorizes the t rial court to en ter a c ertification of defendant’ s right of appeal from a judg ment of guilt or other appealableorder. There b eing no su ch judgment

or order, appellant has nothing to ap peal in the underlying cause. No motion for rehearing will b e entertained and o ur mandate wi ll issue fort hwith. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. Per Curiam Do not publish
.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
    <meta name="robots" content="noindex">
    <title>Offices & Divisions - NIDDK</title>
    
<meta name="VIcurrentDateTime" content="638490777359569066" />
<meta name="VirtualFolder" content="/" />
<script type="text/javascript" src="/layouts/system/VisitorIdentification.js"></script>

</head>
<body>
    <div></div>
</body>
</html>
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

The Board of
Directors 
Rimage Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (Nos. 333-161262, 333-147344, 333-53875, 333-69550, 333-106901
and 333-127244) on Form S-8 of Rimage Corporation and subsidiaries of our
report dated March 14, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Rimage Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2010, and the related financial statement schedule,
and our report dated March 14, 2011 with respect to the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which
reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Rimage
Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota March 14, 2011

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# 2013 Allocation and Matching

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

FY 2013 Allocation and Matching(pdf - 842.76 KB)

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

funding opportunityNew Beginning for Tribal Students Program

funding opportunityResearch Facilities Act Program

funding opportunityAgriculture and Food Research Initiative - Education and Workforce Development

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

postProtecting Our Water

postNumber of AFRI FY 2024 Commodity Board Co-Funding Topics Breaks Record; Expands Focus on Nutrition 

postTropical Birds Could Tolerate Warming Better Than Expected 

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

postTropical Birds Could Tolerate Warming Better Than Expected 

postCultivating the Future: Agricultural Innovations for Climate Resilience

postNevada Researcher Aims to Improve Sorghum Hybrids for Dairy Cattle Feed
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1839-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Tennessee; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-1839-DR), dated May 15, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 21, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Tennessee is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of May 15, 2009.

    Humphreys County for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-12854 Filed 6-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6300

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARRELL WALTER HOLMES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (4:09-cr-00085-MSD-FBS-1; 4:13-cv-00113-MSD)

Submitted: June 18, 2015 Decided: June 23, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell Walter Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Darrell Walter Holmes seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Holmes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.
3

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wu Song Chen, Appellant.

[977 NYS2d 663]

— An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berk-man, J.), rendered on or about October 5, 2011, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur— Friedman, J.E, Renwick, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.
#### BOWLES, Price Administrator, v. SOUTH PITTSBURG COAL CO.

No. 722.

District Court, E. D. Tennessee, S. D.

Nov. 19, 1945.

Edward N. Vaden and Paul G. Hyman, both of Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiff.

E. Blaine Buchanan, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for defendant.

DARR, District Judge.

There has been submitted an approved order dismissing this case without prejudice on the motion of the plaintiff.

I do not believe that this is a proper order in view of all the circumstances and have declined to approve it. This case came on for action of the Court upon application for a preliminary injunction. After hearing argument and after careful consideration, the application for preliminary injunction was denied.

The facts of the case are not in dispute and the same rules applicable in denying the application for a preliminary injunction would bar the action on its merits.

Such being the situation, it is my judgment that the plaintiff should not be permitted to ascertain the views of one court then dismiss without prejudice with the right to undertake to secure a different conclusion in another tribunal. I think that these circumstances present a situation where I should exercise the discretion granted under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 41(a) (2), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, by denying dismissal without prejudice. Cf. Baker v. Sisk, D.C.E.D.Okl., 1 F.R.D. 232.

I think the suit should be dismissed with prejudice or proceed to final judgment.
#### Joseph Gerdvil, Appellant, v Vito J. Rizzo et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 9, 2010;

decided September 14, 2010

*820Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### Larry RUTHER, Appellant v. M.J. MAKANDA, Appellee.

No. 06-7097.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 19, 2006.

Larry Ruther, Manassas, VA, pro se.

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed May 8, 2006, and May 25, 2006, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration of that order.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Howard W. Robin, Chief Executive Officer of Sirna Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company), and I, Martin Schmieg, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge, as follows:



|1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 30thday of March, 2005.



/s/ Howard W. RobinHoward W. RobinPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Martin SchmiegMartin Schmieg Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)




This certification is furnished
and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section, nor shall such certification be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any
registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101 (Thursday, May 28, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 25385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12582]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 101 / Thursday, May 28, 2009 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 25385]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2009-18 of May 19, 2009

                
Proposed Agreement for Cooperation Between the 
                Government of the United States of America And the 
                Government of the United Arab Emirates Concerning 
                Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the 
                Secretary of Energy

                I have considered the proposed Agreement for 
                Cooperation Between the Government of the United States 
                of America and the Government of the United Arab 
                Emirates Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, 
                along with the views, recommendations, and statements 
                of the interested agencies.

                I have determined that the performance of the Agreement 
                will promote, and will not constitute an unreasonable 
                risk to, the common defense and security. Pursuant to 
                section 123 b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
                amended (42 U.S.C. 2153(b)), I hereby approve the 
                proposed Agreement and authorize the Secretary of State 
                to arrange for its execution.

                The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to 
                publish this determination in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, May 19, 2009

[FR Doc. E9-12582
Filed 5-27-09; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P