alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000821616
<NAME>                        BENTLEY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                         4,019
<SECURITIES>                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                  4,014
<ALLOWANCES>                   (69)
<INVENTORY>                    1,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               10,175
<PP&E>                         5,078
<DEPRECIATION>                 (1,531)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 20,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          5,775
<BONDS>                        5,467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>                    0
<COMMON>                       169
<OTHER-SE>                     7,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   20,098
<SALES>                        9,108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               9,230
<CGS>                          4,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  9,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             569
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (744)
<INCOME-TAX>                   255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (999)
<DISCONTINUED>                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                0
<CHANGES>                      0
<NET-INCOME>                  (999)
<EPS-BASIC>                 (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (0.12)


</TABLE>
# Additional Resources

                      - Prevention and Wildfire Investigation Resource Library, Indian Affairs (bia.gov)
                      - Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Get Involved 
                      - National Association of State Foresters (NASF) Where we stand 
                      - National Park Service (NPS) Wildland Fire Classroom 
                      - U.S. Fire Administration (USFA/FEMA) Wildfire Outreach Material 
                      - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Keeping Fire on Our Side 
                      - U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Community Mitigation Assistance Team
                      - Federal Alliance for Safe Homes (FLASH)
                      - FEMA Hazard Mitigation Planning

## More Fire Prevention

-  Hot Topics 
-  Wildfire Prevention 
-  Wildfire Prevention Videos 
-  Wildfire Mitigation 
-  Wildfire Education 
-  Wildfire Investigation 
-  For PAOs 
-  Additional Resources
The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY RHODUS, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-09-270 DECISION

On December 22, 2009, the defendant was sentenced as follows: Count I: A commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of thirteen (13) months, followed by five (5) years in the Montana State Prison, with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol - Fourth or Subsequent Offense, a felony; Count II: A commitment to the Missoula County Detention Center for a term of one (1) year, with all but 14 days suspended, for the offense of Habitual Offender Operating Motor Vehicle, a misdemeanor; and Count V: A commitment to the Missoula County Detention Center for a term of ten (10) days, with ten (10) days suspended, for the offense of Fail to Carry Proof or Exhibit/Insurance in Vehicle, 1st Offense, a misdemeanor. Counts I, II and V shall run consecutively with each other.

On May 6,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he did not wish to proceed.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the application for review of sentence shall be waived.

Done in open Court this 6 th day of May, 2010.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for th e 1 Distric t of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorabl e Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3930

___________ Leland F. Erickson, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue * District of Minnesota. Service; District Director, Internal * Revenue, District of St. Paul; Cassandra * [Unpublished] Black, Revenue Agent; Rebecca Olson, * Group Manager, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 5, 1997 Filed: July 9, 1997

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Leland F. Erickson appeals from the district court's denial of his moti on to quash 1 Internal Revenue Service summonses. After reviewing the record and the parties'-2-

submi ssions, we find that the district court did not clearly err in denying Erickson' s motion. See Fortney v. United States , 59 F.3d 117, 119 (9t h Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EX-4.8



 





Exhibit 4.8




CERTIFICATE OF TRUST




OF




NATIONAL CITY CAPITAL TRUST X




     THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of NATIONAL CITY CAPITAL TRUST X (the “Trust”), dated as of November
5, 2007 is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustee, to form a statutory trust
under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. (Section) 3801 et seq.).



     1. NAME. The name of the statutory trust being formed hereby is National City Capital Trust
X.



     2. DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust with a
principal place of business in the State of Delaware are as follows:



The Bank of New York (Delaware)

White Clay Center, Route 273

New Castle County

Newark, Delaware 19711

Attention: Corporate Trust




     3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustee of the Trust, has executed this
Certificate of Trust as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE)

Not in its individual capacity, but
solely as Delaware Trustee

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Kristine K. Gullo	 
	 	 	Name: Kristine K. Gullo	 
	 	 	Title: Vice President
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 22, 2014

No. 04-13-00744-CR

Arturo NORIEGA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR4087

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s brief is due June 20, 2014. No further extensions of time will be granted. 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2718 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2718

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ion exchange 
                       resins (cationic H form).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ion exchange 
                       resins (cationic H form).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ION EXCHANGE RESINS (CATIONIC H FORM).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.71 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain ion exchange resins 
(cationic H form)) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting 
``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE UNIVERSITY

 REQUEST FOR OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT

Instructions: NIU is only capable of providing hard copy transcripts via the U.S. Postal system. At 

this time, we are unable to provide electronic copies. To complete the form, please fill in the fields 

below detailing your request (type or print). This form may be submitted via the following

methods: 

(1) faxed to 301-227-7067

(2) emailed to NIU_Enrollments@niu.odni.gov

(3) hand delivered to a Registrar's Office staff member

I authorize ____ (specify quantity) official transcript(s) be sent to: 

Recipient’s Name: _____________________________________________________________ 

Street Address: ________________________________________________________________

 City: _______________________________ State: _____________ Zip Code_____________ 

Student Name: ________________________________________________ 

Student ID or last 4 digits of SSN: ________________________________ 

Current Address: _______________________________________________________________ 

City: _______________________________ State: _____________ Zip Code ______________ 

Current email: ______________________________________________ 

Signature: _____________________________________________ Date: _________________ 

Please Note: Transcript requests cannot be processed without a signature. 

For Internal Staffing Use

Transcript sent on ______________ by _________________________________________

[Date] [NIU Personnel Name]
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40612

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JUSTIN ADAMS OLSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 814

Filed: December 31, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Canyon County. Hon. Bradly S. Ford, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with five years 

determinate, for sexual abuse of a child under sixteen years, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Sally J. Cooley, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Justin Adams Olson pled guilty to sexual abuse of a child under sixteen years. Idaho 

Code § 18-1506(b). The district court sentenced Olson to a unified term of fifteen years, with 

five years determinate. Thereafter, Olson filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction 

of his sentence, which the district court denied. Olson now appeals, contending his sentence is 

excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 

1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 
2

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Olson’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 11


                        HAGGAR CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

            COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
                                                      1996         1995        1994        1993        1992
                                                   ---------     --------    ---------   ---------   ---------

<S>                                                <C>            <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>
Net income (loss) to common stockholders           $  (2,420)    $  9,809    $  25,681   $  15,012   $  11,315
Weighted average common shares and 
  common share equivalents outstanding                 8,552        8,623        8,700       7,956       5,805
                                                   ---------     --------    ---------   ---------   ---------

Net Income (loss) per common share and 
  common share equivalent                          $   (0.28)    $   1.14    $    2.95   $    1.88   $    1.95
                                                   ---------     --------    ---------   ---------   ---------
                                                   ---------     --------    ---------   ---------   ---------

Computation of net income (loss) to 
  common stockholders:
    Net income (loss)                              $  (2,420)    $  9,809    $  25,681   $  15,012   $  12,432
    Cumulative preferred stock dividend                    -            -            -           -      (1,117)
                                                   ---------     --------    ---------   ---------   ---------
                                                   $  (2,420)    $  9,809    $  25,681   $  15,012   $  11,315
                                                   ---------     --------    ---------   ---------   ---------
                                                   ---------     --------    ---------   ---------   ---------

Computation of weighted average common shares and 
  Common share equivalents outstanding:
    Weighted average common shares outstanding         8,551        8,546        8,537       5,928       5,805
    Share equivalents, due to stock options(1)             1           77          163           -           -
    Preferred shares converted to common shares            -            -            -         622           -
    New common shares issued                               -            -            -       1,406           -
                                                   ---------     --------    ---------   ---------   ---------
                                                       8,552        8,623        8,700       7,956       5,805
                                                   ---------     --------    ---------   ---------   ---------
                                                   ---------     --------    ---------   ---------   ---------
</TABLE>

     (1)  Common share equivalents due to stock options have been calculated
          using the treasury stock method and the average stock price for both
          the primary and fully diluted earnings per share.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION (1)

      Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), Emile
Loria, M.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Epimmune Inc. (the "Company"), and
Robert De Vaere, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Exchange Act; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated: August 11, 2004

/s/ Emile Loria                          /s/ Robert De Vaere
----------------------------------       ----------------------------------
Emile Loria, M.D.                        Robert De Vaere
President and Chief Executive Officer    Vice President, Finance and
                                         Administration and Chief Financial
                                         Officer

-----------------------
(1) This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Epimmune Inc. under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing).

                                        1
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2605 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2605

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Propenoic acid, reaction products 
   with o-cresol-epichlorohydrin-formaldehyde polymer and 3a,4,7,7a-
                   tetrahydro-1,3-isobenzofurandione.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Propenoic acid, reaction products 
   with o-cresol-epichlorohydrin-formaldehyde polymer and 3a,4,7,7a-
                   tetrahydro-1,3-isobenzofurandione.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-PROPENOIC ACID, REACTION PRODUCTS WITH O-CRESOL-
              EPICHLOROHYDRIN-FORMALDEHYDE POLYMER AND 3A,4,7,7A-
              TETRAHYDRO-1,3-ISOBENZOFURANDIONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      2-Propenoic acid,   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        reaction products                                                  31/2011.......
                        with o-cresol-
                        epichlorohydrin-
                        formaldehyde
                        polymer and
                        3a,4,7,7a-
                        tetrahydro-1,3-
                        isobenzofurandion
                        e (CAS No. 186511-
                        06-8) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        3907.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
SLA BATTERY CONFIGURATIONS

In situations when there is heavy voice traffic on the system or where access to the site is limited, NIRSC recommends a 

double-battery system to avoid power failure during the incident. Even with a double battery system, voltage should be 

checked or batteries replaced every 7 days. (See Figure 2)

Solar Panel Kits (NFES# 004080) are available from NIRSC and are recommended for use at sites with limited access. 

Contact the CDO for Solar Panel Kit availability before ordering.

Figure 1:

+12V Single SLA Battery used for radio and

handsets in the 4330 Remote Kits and the

4330EX Expansion Kits.

Figure 2:

+12V Double SLA Battery Parallel

Configuration used to power the 4312, 4248, 

4370, and the 4281 Kits

NIRSC SLA Battery Configuration
4312, 4248 and 4370 SLA BATTERY INSTALLATION

All 4312, 4248, 4330, 4370 and 4248 kits will be sent from NIRSC without any batteries physically connected to the 

equipment. The user must install the batteries from the NFES# 4150 SLA Battery Kit to make them operational. 

Please follow the appropriate battery configuration and installation procedure for each piece of equipment.

NIRSC SLA Battery Configuration
4330/4330EX SLA BATTERY INSTALLATION

All 4312, 4248, 4330, 4370 and 4248 kits will be sent from NIRSC without any batteries physically connected to the 

equipment. The user must install the batteries from the NFES# 4150 SLA Battery Kit to make them operational. 

Please follow the appropriate battery configuration and installation procedure for each piece of equipment.

NIRSC SLA Battery Configuration
SLA BATTERY CHARGING AND WARNINGS

!!!!!WARNING!!!!!

• The terminals on the SLA batteries are exposed and can be prone to accidental short circuiting during transportation.

• SLA batteries will discharge much more violently in the event of a short circuit compared to alkaline batteries.

• Always take appropriate precautions to ensure the terminals are protected with electrical tape, covers or other nonconductive material to prevent short circuits while transporting SLA batteries.

• DO NOT transport repeaters or other equipment with SLA batteries installed. Use original packaging to transport SLA

batteries to and from mountain top locations.

• When transporting SLA batteries, remove all jumper wires and cables.

• DO NOT connect a dead battery to a fully charged battery.

NIRSC SLA Battery Configuration