alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 128444 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 128444 

 COA: 252101 
 Wayne CC: 03-007591-01 

MARIO SHARONN McCREE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005 

Clerk
Summary of Imperial Sugar Company Management Incentive Plan



 EXHIBIT 10(h) 
 IMPERIAL SUGAR COMPANY 
 SUMMARY MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The Company has adopted Management Incentive Plans for Fiscal 2007 and 2008 for executive officers and certain other participants. The plans provide for cash bonuses
based on achievement of a combination of individual performance goals and corporate profitability targets. The corporate profitability targets for Fiscal 2007 are based on the Company’s attainment of certain EBITDA goals. EBITDA is defined as
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The achievement of individual performance goals and corporate profitability targets results in an incentive payment based on a participant’s bonus opportunity, which is set at a
percentage of the participant’s base salary and is based on the participants responsibilities and position within the Company. 
 Fiscal 2007 Plan

 A specified portion of the target bonus opportunity is allocated to individual performance goals, which are quantifiable and result in payment only if
the individual performance goals are reached and a profitability target based on EBITDA is achieved. Twenty-five percent of an officer’s target bonus will be paid when a specific level of EBITDA is achieved and that percentage will increase in
varying degrees through 100% of target bonus for target EBITDA and a maximum of 200% of target bonus when a higher level of EBITDA is achieved. 
 Fiscal
2008 Plan 
 The fiscal 2008 plan is conceptually similar to the 2007 plan and uses EBITDA in determining corporate profitability targets. Individual
performance goals will be treated similar to the 2007 plan. Twenty-five percent of an officer’s target bonus will be paid when a specific level of EBITDA is achieved and that percentage will increase in varying degrees through 100% of target
bonus at a specified level of EBITDA and a maximum of 200% of target bonus when a higher level of EBITDA is achieved. 
  

			
	 Executive Officer
	  	Target Percentage of Salary
	 Robert A. Peiser
	  	100
	 John C. Sheptor
	  	100
	 T. Kay Hastings
	  	  50
	 Patrick D. Henneberry
	  	  50
	 H.P. Mechler
	  	  50
	 William F. Schwer
	  	  50
	 J. Eric Story
	  	  30

 The corporate profitability component represents 80% of the target for Mr. Peiser and Mr. Sheptor, 70%
of the target for Mr. Henneberry and Mr. Mechler and 60% of the target for the remaining executive officers. 
  

 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of YoCream International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
N. Hanna, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


 Date:    September 15, 2003                 By:    /s/  John N. Hanna
                                             John N. Hanna, Chairman of the
                                             Board, and Chief Executive
                                             Officer


This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to YoCream International, Inc. and
will be retained by YoCream International, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2561 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid, dimethylamine salt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. BURRIS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Methyl4-chlorophenoxy-acetic acid, dimethylamine salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2–METHYL-4-CHLOROPHENOXY-ACETIC ACID, 

4 DIMETHYLAMINE SALT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.42 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxy-acetic acid, dimethylamine salt) 

8 is amended by striking the date in the effective period col9 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2561 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# **EXHIBIT32.1**

# ** **

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”)by Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Registrant”), theundersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   | /s/ James R. Murphy                                                         |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | James R. Murphy                                                             |
|   | Chairman of the Board  of Directors,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer)                                               |
|   |                                                                        |
|   | May 9, 2005                                                                 |

 

----
Schedule of Employment Agreements



 EXHIBIT 10(a)(3) 
 SCHEDULE OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS 
  

			
	  	  	Form of
Contract
	 William F. Schwer
	  	A
	 Robert A. Peiser
	  	B

 The Company anticipates executing an employment agreement with John C. Sheptor, effective January 29, 2008,
containing the following key terms: 
 Mr. Sheptor will receive compensation in the amount of $550,000 annual base salary and will be eligible for a bonus
with a target amount of 100% of his annual base salary with a maximum opportunity of two (2) times the target amount conditional upon the Company’s achievement of certain performance and financial goals. 
 The Company will grant Mr. Sheptor 75,000 shares of restricted stock on January 29, 2008 which will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.
# Training and Qualifications for PIOs

## Qualifications

                      - IQCS Position Descriptions/task books 
                      - NWCG PIO Subcommittee

## Training Opportunities   

### Wildland Fire Public Information Officers Webinar, 2020

                      - YouTube video
                      - PowerPoint

### Social Media for PIOs

## PIO Bulletin Board

-  Agency Information 
-  Hot Topics 
-  Incident Resources for PIOs 
-  InciWeb Information 
-  PIO Contacts 
-  Social Media for PIOs 
-  Training and Qualifications for PIOs 
-  Working with Media and Public 
-  Producer’s Guide to Filming 
-  Military Support History
#### Lianghe SHAO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-75278.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 2006 *.

Filed Dec. 8, 2006.

Douglas G. Ingraham, Esq., Alhambra, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Larry P. Cote, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Jill Ptacek, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lianghe Shao, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying Shao’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence, *Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA found Shao not credible based upon inconsistent statements regarding the circumstances of his alleged release from detention, his knowledge of his mother-in-law’s arrest, and the year in which *690the events he alleged precipitated his departure from China occurred. These inconsistencies go to the heart of his claim and support the BIA’s adverse credibility finding. *See id.*at 1043. Because there was adequate reason to question Shao’s credibility, the BIA properly considered Shao’s lack of persuasive corroborative evidence. *See id.*at 1044. Accordingly, Shao faded to establish eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Because Shao’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony that the BIA found to be not credible, and because he points to no other evidence that the BIA failed to consider, he failed to establish eligibility for relief under the CAT. *See id.*at 1157.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 15.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement of KT Corporation on Form F-3 (No. 333-100251) of our report dated March 24, 2006 relating to our audits of the financial statements of KT Freetel Co., Ltd. appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of KT Corporation for theyear ended December 31, 2005, and to the reference to our firm under the heading “Experts” in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 of KT Corporation. 

 

Deloitte Anjin LLC 

June 26, 2006
Attachment 1 - 1

This 2021 BLM National Aviation Plan/2021 BLM Idaho Aviation Plan has been: 

Prepared by: 

Reviewed by: 

Reviewed by: 

Approved by: 

BRAD 

RICHARDS 

Digitally signed by BRAD 

RICHARDS 

Date: 2022.06.09 16: 15:36 

.06'00' 

BLM Idaho State Aviation Manager- Brad Richards 

MARTIN ADELL�����

lys

ignedbyMARTIN

Date: 2022.06.13 07:58:17 •06'00' 

BLM Idaho State Fire Management Officer - Dennis Strange 

LOREN GOOD 0:gitalJysfgnedbylORENGOOO 

Date; 2022.06.14 12:34:18 -06'00' 

BLM Office of Law Enforcement and Security 

Special Agent in Charge - Loren R. Good 

KAREN KELL EH ER O[gltaUyslgned by KAREN KELL.EHER

Date: 2022.06.29 12:19:14-06'00' 

BLM Idaho State Director - Karen Kelleher 

BLM Idaho State Office 

1387 South Vinnell Way 

Boise, Idaho 83709 

Date 

Date 

Date 

Date 

Attachment 1 - 3
Attachment 1 - 4
Attachment 1 - 5

Attachment 1 - 7

Attachment 1 - 9

Attachment 1 - 11

Attachment 1 - 13

Attachment 1 - 15

Attachment 1 - 17

Attachment 1 - 19

Attachment 1 - 21

Attachment 1 - 23

Attachment 1 - 25

Attachment 1 - 27

Attachment 1 - 29

Attachment 1 - 31

Attachment 1 - 33

Attachment 1 - 35

Attachment 1 - 37

Attachment 1 - 39

Attachment 1 - 41

Attachment 1 - 43

Attachment 1 - 45

Attachment 1 - 47

Attachment 1 - 49

Attachment 1 - 51

Attachment 1 - 53

Attachment 1 - 55

Attachment 1 - 57

Attachment 1 - 59

Attachment 1 - 61

Attachment 1 - 63

Attachment 1 - 65

Attachment 1 - 67

Attachment 1 - 69

Attachment 1 - 71

Attachment 1 - 73

Attachment 1 - 75

Attachment 1 - 77

Attachment 1 - 79

Attachment 1 - 81

Attachment 1 - 83

Attachment 1 - 85

Attachment 1 - 87

Attachment 1 - 89

Attachment 1 - 91

Attachment 1 - 93

Attachment 1 - 95

Attachment 1 - 97

Attachment 1 - 99

Attachment 1 - 101

Attachment 1 - 103

Attachment 1 - 105

Attachment 1 - 107

Attachment 1 - 109

Attachment 1 - 111

Attachment 1 - 113

Attachment 1 - 115

Attachment 1 - 117

Attachment 1 - 119

Attachment 1 - 121

Attachment 1 - 123

Attachment 1 - 125

Attachment 1 - 127

Attachment 1 - 129

Attachment 1 - 131

Attachment 1 - 133

Attachment 1 - 135

Attachment 1 - 137

Attachment 1 - 139

Attachment 1 - 141

Attachment 1 - 143

Attachment 1 - 145

Attachment 1 - 147

Attachment 1 - 149

Attachment 1 - 151

Attachment 1 - 153

Attachment 1 - 155

Attachment 1 - 157

Attachment 1 - 159

Attachment 1 - 161

Attachment 1 - 163

Attachment 1 - 165

Attachment 1 - 167

Attachment 1 - 169

Attachment 1 - 171

Attachment 1 - 173

Attachment 1 - 175

Attachment 1 - 177

Attachment 1 - 179

Attachment 1 - 181

Attachment 1 - 183

Attachment 1 - 185

Attachment 1 - 187

Attachment 1 - 189

Attachment 1 - 191

Attachment 1 - 193

Attachment 1 - 195

Attachment 1 - 197

Attachment 1 - 199

Attachment 1 - 201

Attachment 1 - 203

Attachment 1 - 205

Attachment 1 - 207

Attachment 1 - 209

Attachment 1 - 211
**EXHIBIT 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following    Registration Statements:     1) Registration Statement    (Form S-3No. 333-108848)    of Sirna Therapeutics, Inc.     2) Registration Statement    (Form S-3/ANo. 333-108848)    of Sirna Therapeutics, Inc.     3) Registration Statement    (Form S-3No. 333-110603)    of Sirna Therapeutics, Inc.     4) Registration Statement    (Form S-3No. 333-115421)    of Sirna Therapeutics, Inc.     5) Registration Statement    (Form S-3No. 333-126937)    of Sirna Therapeutics, Inc.     6) Registration Statement    (Form S-3No. 333-129944)    of Sirna Therapeutics, Inc.     7) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-104873)    pertaining to the 401(k) Salary Reduction Plan and Trust, the    2001 Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of    Sirna Therapeutics, Inc.     8) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-128496)    pertaining to the 2005 Performance Incentive Plan of Sirna    Therapeutics, Inc.     and related prospectuses of our report dated March 9, 2006,    with respect to the financial statements of Sirna Therapeutics,    Inc., included in this Annual Report    (Form 10-K)    for the year ended December 31, 2005. **/s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP**     Denver, Colorado    March 27, 2006
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2637 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plastic base material spotlights 

and nightlights. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plastic base 

material spotlights and nightlights. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASTIC BASE MATERIAL SPOT4 LIGHTS AND NIGHTLIGHTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2637 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Spotlights (other than handheld), of plastics, suitable for 

use as theatrical lighting and 

designed to be affixed to 

walls, ceilings or supporting 

stands or beams; nightlights 

with manual on/off switch; or 

automatic rotating, lightemitting diode (LED), lightdirecting LED or motion-activated night lights, all the 

foregoing of plastics(provided 

for in subheading 

9405.40.80) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
KEYON
      COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.

    11742
      Stonegate Circle

    Omaha,
      Nebraska 68164

     

    December
      4, 2007

     

    Barry
      Honig

    595
      South
      Federal Highway, Suite 600

    Boca
      Raton, Florida 33432

     

    Re:
      Termination Letter

     

    Dear
      Barry:

     

    Reference
      is made to (i) that certain Bridge Note Purchase Agreement, made as of November
      6, 2007, between KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the “Company”)
      and
      Barry Honig (the “Purchase
      Agreement”),
      (ii)
      that certain Promissory Note, dated November 6, 2007, issued by the Company
      to
      Barry Honig for the principal sum of up to $750,000 (the “Note”)
      and
      (iii) that certain warrant to purchase up to 93,750 shares of common stock
      of
      the Company, dated November 6, 2007, issued by the Company to Barry Honig (the
      “Warrant,”
and
      together with the Purchase Agreement and the Note, the “Transaction
      Documents”).
      The
      Company and Barry Honig hereby agree (i) that no funds were ever advanced by
      Barry Honig to the Company under the Transaction Documents and (ii) to terminate
      each of the Transaction Documents, effective immediately. Without limiting
      the
      generality or effect of the immediately preceding sentence, from and after
      the
      execution and delivery of this Letter Agreement, each of Barry Honig and the
      Company shall have no further rights or obligations under any of the Transaction
      Documents.

     

    This
      Letter Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which
      when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and, all of which taken
      together, shall constitute one and the same agreement and shall become effective
      when counterparts have been signed by each party and delivered to the other
      party hereto, it being understood that all parties need not sign the same
      counterpart. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile
      transmission, such signature shall create a valid binding obligation of the
      party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) the same with
      the same force and effect as if such facsimile signature were the original
      thereof.

     

    Very
      truly yours,

    /s/
Jonathan
      Snyder

    Jonathan
      Snyder,

    Chief
      Executive Officer and President

    Acknowledged
      and Agreed:

     

    /s/
      Barry Honig           


    Barry
      Honig

     

    Dated:  12/5/07
#### Harrell v. Bowen

Case below: 179 N.C. App. 857

No. 587P06

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. 7A-31 (COA06-256)

Allowed 05/03/07
Order entered January 11 , 2017

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 17

- 0000 8

- CV

IN RE NAZARIO CHAVEZ , JR., Relator

O riginal Proceeding from the Justice of the Peace 1

- 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JT

- 15M8400H



### O RDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this original proceeding for want

of jurisdiction. We ORDER relator to bear the costs, if any, of this original proceeding.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



The registrant has the following subsidiaries, which except as indicated, do business under their legal names:



|                                                                                   |  |                                    
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|NAME                                                                               |  | PLACE OF INCORPORATION/ORGANIZATION
|DOCTORS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, INC.                                                  |  | TEXAS                              
|VISTA HEALTHCARE, INC.                                                             |  | TEXAS                              
|VISTA LAND AND EQUIPMENT, L.L.C.                                                   |  | TEXAS                              
|VISTA REDSTONE, INC.                                                               |  | NEVADA                             
|PASADENA NEVADA, INC.                                                              |  | NEVADA                             
|DPM II, INC.                                                                       |  | TEXAS                              
|DALLAS NEVADA, INC.                                                                |  | NEVADA                             
|VISTA DALLAS, L.L.C.                                                               |  | TEXAS                              
|VISTA HOSPITAL OF BATON ROUGE, L.L.C. d/b/a VISTA SURGICAL HOSPITAL OF BATON ROUGE |  | LOUISIANA                          
|VISTA HOLDINGS, L.L.C.                                                             |  | LOUISIANA                          
|AMBULATORY INFUSION THERAPY SPECIALIST, INC.                                       |  | TEXAS                              
|VISTA MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.                                                   |  | LOUISIANA                          
|VISTA HOSPITAL OF DALLAS, L.P. d/b/a VISTA HOSPITAL OF DALLAS                      |  | TEXAS                              
|VISTA SURGICAL CENTER WEST, L.L.C.                                                 |  | TEXAS                              
|VISTA RIVERSTONE HOSPITAL, L.P. d/b/a RIVERSTONE HOSPITAL                          |  | TEXAS                              
|VISTA COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER, L.L.P. d/b/a VISTA MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL         |  | TEXAS
#### Gore v. Myrtle/Mueller

Case below: 178 N.C. App. 561

No. 396P06

1. Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-988)

2. Defs’ Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 03/08/07

2. Allowed 03/08/07