alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2506
MYRON BOGGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOUTHEASTERN TIDEWATER OPPORTUNITY PROJECT, a/k/a The Stop Organization, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-766-2) Submitted: December 26, 1996 Decided: January 21, 1997 Before HALL, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Myron Boggs, Appellant Pro Se. James A. Gorry, III, Richard William Zahn, Jr., TAYLOR & WALKER, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (1994), and alleging violations of First Amendment and privacy rights under the United States Constitution. We have reviewed the record and conclude that this action is barred by res judicata. See Keith v. Aldridge , 900 F.2d 736, 739 (4th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, we affirm the ruling of the district court. Boggs v. Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity Project , No. CA-96-766-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 5 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XM55


Marine Mammals; File No. 782-1708

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the NMFS National Marine Mammal 
Laboratory, Seattle, WA has been issued a minor amendment to Scientific 
Research Permit No. 782-1708-04.

ADDRESSES: The amendment and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office:
    Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 
20910; phone (301)713-2289; fax (301)427-2521.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tammy Adams or Kate Swails, (301)713-
2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The requested amendment has been granted 
under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and the regulations governing the 
taking and importing of marine mammals (50 CFR part 216).
    The original permit (No. 782-1708), issued on August 23, 2003 (68 
FR 53967) and valid through December 31, 2008, authorized research on 
northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) of the San Miguel Islands 
Stock at San Miguel Island, California, and of the Eastern North 
Pacific Stock at Bogoslof Island and the Pribilof Islands in Alaska. 
The permit was subsequently amended four times to modify methods and 
take numbers. The minor amendment (No. 782-1708-05) extends the 
duration of the permit through December 31, 2009, and does not change 
any other terms or conditions of the permit.

    Dated: January 2, 2009.
P. Michael Payne,
Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division, Office of 
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-124 Filed 1-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
#### Marc S. Kirschner, as Trustee of the Refco Litigation Trust, Appellant, v KPMG LLP et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Submitted August 2, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

*784Motion by National Association of Bankruptcy Trustees for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on consideration of the certified questions herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
<PAGE>   1
[KPMG LETTERHEAD]





                                                                      EXHIBIT 23





The Board of Directors
Laurel Capital Group, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
33-080798 on Form S-8 of Laurel Capital Group, Inc. of our report dated August
10, 2001, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of
Laurel Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiary as of June 30, 2001 and 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2001, which
report is incorporated by reference in the June 30, 2001, annual report on Form
10-K of Laurel Capital Group, Inc.



                                             /s/ KPMG LLP
                                             -------------------
                                             KPMG LLP





Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
September 28, 2001
**Facebook****Email**Print**Facebook****Email

## Overview

The Arthritis Biology Program covers basic as well as patient-relevant clinical research in a number of arthritic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, Lyme arthritis, and viral arthritis. The mission of the program is to better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying disease pathogenesis and translate early evidence into developing treatments and improving patient outcomes.

Areas of focus include:
                          - Involvement of synovium, cartilage and bone in disease initiation and perpetuation;
                          - Role of the innate and adaptive immune systems and associated signaling pathways in the initiation and propagation of arthritis;
                          - Role of stromal cells and their interactions with immune cells in joint tissue remodeling pathways in arthritis;
                          - Contribution of dysregulated cellular processes (e.g., metabolism, cell cycle, autophagy, etc.) to the etiology and pathogenesis of arthritis;
                          - Identification of critical cellular and molecular pathways involved in pathogenesis to facilitate identification of potential therapeutic targets;
                          - Design, development and execution of clinical trials and longitudinal cohorts in arthritic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, Lyme arthritis, and viral arthritis;
                          - Execution of research to effectively test the comparative efficacy and safety of new and existing therapies (drugs, biologics, devices);
                          - Elucidation of mechanisms of extra-articular organ involvement and the development of co-morbidities;
                          - Development of animal models that adequately reflect human disease to study the mechanisms of arthritis;
                          - Use of non-invasive methodologies and technologies for functional studies of disease prognosis and disease course.

#### Contact Us

### Su-Yau Mao, Ph.D.

Bethesda MD 20892-4872

Su-Yau.Mao@nih.gov

## Funding Opportunities

## Research News

**Facebook****Email**Print**Facebook****Email
#### Devendra Chatoorang, Appellant, v G.C. Navarrete-Duque, Respondent.

[963 NYS2d 108]

*519Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered February 7, 2012, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

Defendant failed to establish that plaintiffs claimed dental injury, consisting of a fracture of a front tooth, was not caused by the accident or did not constitute a serious injury within the “fracture” category of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Newman v Datta,*72 AD3d 537 [1st Dept 2010]). In any event, in opposition to the motion, plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact. Plaintiff submitted an affirmation of his dentist averring that plaintiff underwent dental treatment for his fractured central incisors, that the fracture was causally related to the accident, and that he would be required to undergo ongoing dented treatment *(see Newman*at 537; *Kennedy v Anthony,*195 AD2d 942 [3d Dept 1993]).

In view of the foregoing finding that the injuries to plaintiffs teeth meet the no-fault threshold, “it is unnecessary to address whether his proof with respect to other injuries he allegedly sustained would have been sufficient to withstand defendant’s] motion for summary judgment” *(Linton v Nawaz,*14 NY3d 821, 822 [2010]; *Rubin v SMS Taxi Corp.,*71 AD3d 548, 549-550 [1st Dept 2010]).

Concur—Andrias, J.P., Moskowitz, Freedman, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, July 22, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Susan Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or (515) 564-6638. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee will be held Wednesday, July 22, 2009, at 3 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Susan Gilbert. For more information please contact Ms. Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or (515) 564-6638 or write: TAP Office, 210 Walnut Street, Des Moines, IA 50309 or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                 

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: May 27, 2009. 

Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. E9-12758 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 27, 2010 

s0120 

Order 

 

January 27, 2010 

139615 

STEVEN J. HUTCHISON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139615 

 COA: 284259 

Muskegon CC: 05-030607-DO 

DEBORAH M. HUTCHISON, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 28, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Cite as 2013 Ark. 379



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
No. CV-11-632

WILLIAM J. WIGLEY APPELLANT
V. RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION APPELLEE Opinion Delivered October 3, 2013 PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE JEFFERSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, 35CV-11-110, HON. JODI RAINES DENNIS, JUDGE

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM While an inmate in the Tucker Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC), located in Jefferson County, appellant William J. Wigley filed pro se petitions for declaratory judgment and writ of mandamus in the Jefferson County Circuit Court based on claims that theADC improperly withheld his meritorious good-time credit and miscalculated his transfereligibility date. The circuit court entered an order denying appellant’s petitions and dismissing the case with prejudice. Appellant brings this appeal. Since appellant filed his brief on appeal, he has provided a change of address indicating that he has been released from the custody of the ADC. Thus, we take judicial notice that appellant is no longer incarcerated. As a general rule, appellate courts of this state will not review moot issues, as doing so would be to render an advisory opinion, which this court will
not do. Bank of Am., N.A. v. Brown , 2011 Ark. 446. Generally, an issue becomes moot when any judgment rendered would have no practical effect upon a then-existing legal controversy. Lott v. Langley , 2013 Ark. 247; State v. First Serv. Bank of Greenbrier , 2013 Ark. 101. Because appellantCite as 2013 Ark. 379

is no longer incarcerated, granting the relief requested would have no practical effect such that the issue on appeal is moot at this time. Appeal dismissed. William J. Wigley , pro se appellant.
Dustin McDaniel

, Att’y Gen., by: Pamela A. Rumpz , Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101 (Thursday, May 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12593]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date:  11 a.m., Friday, June 12, 2009.

Place:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status:  Closed.

Matters To Be Considered:  Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information:  Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-
5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-12593 Filed 5-26-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
No. 81.

#### Riley et al., Executors, *v.*New York Trust Co., Administrator, et al.

March 16, 1942.

*Ante,*p. 343.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence A. Gyenes, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Lawrence A. Gyenes


Lawrence A. Gyenes


Senior Vice President,


Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


July 30, 2010
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2599 

To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of man-made fibers 

assembled as a single species bush, with or without foliage. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mrs. HUTCHISON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of manmade fibers assembled as a single species bush, with 

or without foliage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS OF MAN-MADE FIBERS 

4 ASSEMBLED AS A SINGLE SPECIES BUSH, 

5 WITH OR WITHOUT FOLIAGE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2599 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Artificial flowers of manmade fibers assembled as a 

single species bush, with or 

without foliage (provided for 

in subheading 6702.90.35) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SECOND QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,517
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             330
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                53,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     16,086
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         113,471
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           113,923
<LOANS>                                        965,844
<ALLOWANCE>                                     13,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,161,137
<DEPOSITS>                                     998,420
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,636
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             13,391
<LONG-TERM>                                     55,859
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,735
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,161,137
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 32,858
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,379
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                39,237
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              22,430
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,604
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,203
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      115
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 610
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,486
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,486
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,976
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.89
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,746
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                13,223
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      201 
<RECOVERIES>                                        56
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               13,193
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            13,193
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         12,945
        

</TABLE>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 31, 2020 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01287-CV 

OLIVA GIL, Appellant 

V. 

CITY OF KAUFMAN, KAUFMAN COUNTY, KAUFMAN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL 

DISTRICT, AND TRINITY VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court 

Kaufman County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 102446-422 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Nowell 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

 We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal from the trial court’s “final order” as the 

clerk’s record did not reflect a final order, or any appealable order, had been signed. See Lehmann 

v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (appeal may be taken only from final judgment 

or appealable order). In a letter brief, filed at our request, appellant agrees we lack jurisdiction. 

 Because nothing before us demonstrates we have jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal and 

all pending motions. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 

191287F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/ 

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

OLIVA GIL, Appellant 

No. 05-19-01287-CV V. 

CITY OF KAUFMAN, KAUFMAN 

COUNTY, KAUFMAN INDEPENDENT 

SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND TRINITY 

VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 

DISTRICT, Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District 

Court, Kaufman County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 102446-422. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, 

Justices Whitehill and Nowell participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

Judgment entered January 31, 2020.
<PAGE>

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-1 No. 33-51950) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option and Incentive 
Plan of Kankakee Bancorp, Inc., of our report dated January 22, 1999, with 
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Kankakee Bancorp, Inc. 
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended 
December 31, 1998.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement (Form S-1 No. 33-51950) pertaining to the Kankakee Federal Amended 
and Restated 401 (K) Savings Plan of our report dated January 22, 1999, with 
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Kankakee Bancorp, Inc. 
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended 
December 31, 1998.



McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
Champaign, Illinois
March 17, 1999
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PEBBLE HILLS PLAZA, LTD.

,

Appellant,

v.

ASLM, LTD.

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00157

- CV

Appeal from

41st Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2022DCV1639 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant all costs of app eal , for which let execution issue. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2 9 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 20 24

.

L ISA J. SOTO

, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, J J.