alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                           Section 302 Certifications

I, Jim Miller, certify that:

         1.       I have  reviewed this  quarterly  report on form 10-QSB of CNH
                  Holdings Company.

         2.       Based on my knowledge,  this quarterly report does not contain
                  any untrue  statement  of a  material  fact or omit to state a
                  material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light
                  of the  circumstances  under which such  statements were made,
                  not  misleading  with  respect to the  period  covered by this
                  quarterly report.

         3.       Based on my  knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other
                  financial  information  included  in  this  quarterly  report,
                  fairly   present  in  all  material   respects  the  financial
                  condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows  of  the
                  registrant  as of,  and for,  the  periods  presented  in this
                  quarterly report;

         4.       I am responsible for establishing  and maintaining  disclosure
                  controls  and  procedures  (as defined in  Exchange  Act Rules
                  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a)       Designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure
                  that  material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,
                  including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to us
                  by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
                  period in which this quarterly report is being prepared.

         b)       Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure
                  controls and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to
                  the filing  date of this  quarterly  report  (the  "Evaluation
                  Date"); and

         c)       Presented in this quarterly  report our conclusions  about the
                  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based
                  on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5.       I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation, to the
                  registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
                  board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
                  functions):

         a)       All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of
                  internal   controls   which   could   adversely   affect   the
                  registrant's ability to record, process,  summarize and report
                  financial  data  and  have  identified  for  the  registrant's
                  auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b)       Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management
                  or  other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the
                  registrant's internal controls; and

Date:  August 14, 2003

/s/ Jim Miller
Jim Miller
Chief Executive Officer
#### In re CREEDON.

No. Civ. 2805.

District Court, TV. D. New York.

Aug. 1, 1947.

*547William L. Messing, of New York City, for petitioner.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

In a petition to substitute Frank R. Creedon as plaintiff in various pending actions in the place and stead of Philip B. Fleming, Administrator of the Office of Temporary Controls, and William L. Messing, Chief, New York Rent Enforcement Section, Office of Rent Control, Office of Housing Expediter, as attorney for said Frank R. Creedon in the place and stead of any and all attorneys of record appearing for plaintiff in such actions, the question arises whether notice of the application for such substitution must be given to the adverse parties.

This matter is governed by U. S. C. A., Title 28, § 780 and by Rule 25(d) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

The civil actions now pending were brought under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 901 et seq., by and in the name of the successive Price Administrators of the Office of Price Administration or by their last successor in office, Philip B. Fleming, Administrator, Office of Temporary Controls. On April 23, 1947, by Executive Order 9841, the termination of the Office of Temporary Controls was provided for and its rent control functions were transferred to said Frank R. Creedon, Housing Expediter, to be performed by him or subject to his direction and control by such officers or agencies of the government as he may designate.

This motion is made within six months after said Frank R. Creedon has taken office. Furthermore, petitioner has satisfactorily shown “that there is a substantial need for so continuing and maintaining” such actions.

Rule 25(d) substantially repeats the words of U.S.C.A., Title 28, § 780(c), and reads as follows:

“Before a substitution is made, the party or officer to be affected, unless expressly assenting thereto, shall be given reasonable notice of the application therefor and accorded an opportunity to object.”

The instant petition is made by said William L. Messing and not by said Frank R. Creedon. The latter is “the party or officer to be affected.” The moving papers do not show that he has expressly assented to his substitution.

Does the word “party” require “reasonable notice of the application therefor” to be given to the adverse parties? This question has received careful consideration in the recent case of Bowles v. Weiner, D.C., 6 F.R.D. 540, which gives a negative answer. This court adopts the reasoning of that decision, which holds that the words “party” and “officer” are synonymous and that it is “the successor-officer who is the party affected and to whom notice is required to be given, and not the opposite party.” 6 F.R.D. page 542.

There is no requirement in the rule that any notice be given in case of the substitution of attorneys.

Upon satisfactory proof that said Frank R. Creedon assents to his substitution, the order in question will be granted.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 11, 2018

No. 04-18-00254-CV

Charles J. MELNIK,

Appellant

v.

Dewayne BALDWIN, Tonia Baldwin,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No 1, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CV-0012

Honorable Robin V. Dwyer, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On December 5, 2018, appellees filed a motion for extension of time in which to file their 

brief. Appellees request an extension of ninety (90) days. Appellees’ motion is GRANTED IN 

PART; the deadline for filing appellees’ brief is extended by sixty (60) days. Appellees’ brief is 

due on or before January 15, 2019.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                               CERTIFICATION (1)

      Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), Emile
Loria, M.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Epimmune Inc. (the "Company"), and
Robert De Vaere, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Exchange Act; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated: August 9, 2005

/s/ Emile Loria                              /s/ Robert De Vaere
--------------------------------------       -----------------------------------
Emile Loria, M.D.                            Robert De Vaere
President and Chief Executive Officer        Vice President, Finance and
                                             Administration and
                                             Chief Financial Officer

------------------
(1) This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Epimmune Inc. under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### Anastasiya M. et al., Appellants, v New York City Board of Education et al., Respondents.

[976 NYS2d 202]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated March 13, 2012, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

The plaintiffs commenced this action after the infant plaintiff allegedly was injured during a school gym class when she fell while walking backwards in an accelerated manner. The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, submitting, in support thereof, the infant plaintiffs testimony from the General Municipal Law § 50-h hearing and her deposition testimony. In opposition to the motion, the infant plaintiff submitted her own affidavit. The Supreme Court granted the motion.

Schools have a duty to adequately supervise children in their charge, and will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision (see *Mirand v City of New York,*84 NY2d 44, 49 [1994]; *Talyanna S. v Mount Vernon City Sch. Dist.,*97 AD3d 561 [2012]; *Paca v City of New York,*51 AD3d 991 [2008]). Although it is not an insurer of children’s safety, a school has a duty to exercise the same degree of care toward its students as would a reasonably prudent parent (see *Diana G. v Our Lady Queen of Martyrs Sch.,*100 AD3d 592 [2012]; *Paragas v Comsewogue Union Free School Dist.,*65 AD3d 1111 [2009]).

Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the infant plaintiff s affidavit was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to their motion for summary judgment. At her deposition and in her affidavit, the infant plaintiff stated that on the day of the accident, she was experiencing “pain and instability” in her ankle, and that she made complaints concerning this condition to the teacher who was supervising the gym class. The infant plaintiff further averred that despite her complaints, the *586teacher nevertheless insisted that she continue to participate in the gym exercises and that, as a result, she thereafter fell and sustained injuries.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the compliant. Dillon, J.P, Angiolillo, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Nina Dakin, Respondent, v James Dakin, Jr., Appellant.

Submitted September 20, 2010;

decided November 18, 2010

*906Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7796
WILLIAM ALASCIO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WORCESTER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JAMES BARRETT; IRA SHOCKLEY, Warden; ROBERT C. LAMAR, Dr., Worcester County Jail, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-376-JFM) Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Alascio, Appellant Pro Se. Linda S. Woolf, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & GRAY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider a previous order in which the court granted summary judgment to defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994)action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Alascio v. Worcester County Comm'rs , No. CA-97-376-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 26, 1997). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Opinion issued October 1, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00628-CV

———————————

IN RE WENDY QUAN AND BRENDA UNG, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF CAPITAL PLASTICS INT’L, INC., 

ELEMENT PLASTICS MFG., INC., AND CASH 10702 INVESTMENT, 

LLC, AND PING CHU AND ANDY CHEN, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF 

OF CAPITAL PLASTICS INT’L, INC., ELEMENT PLASTICS MFG., INC., 

AND CASH 10702 INVESTMENT, LLC, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Wendy Quan and Brenda Ung, individually and derivatively on 

behalf of Capital Plastics Int’l, Inc., Element Plastics Mfg., Inc., and Cash 10702 

Investment, LLC, and Ping Chu and Andy Chen, derivatively on behalf of Capital 

Plastics Int’l, Inc., Element Plastics Mfg., Inc., and Cash 10702 Investment, LLC, 
2

filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s September 1, 2020 

order compelling relators to present Wendy Quan, Brenda Ung, and Ping Chu for 

deposition on September 3 and 4, 2020, and further challenging the trial court’s 

refusal to consider relators’ motion for reconsideration of the September 1, 2020 

order compelling depositions.

1

 Relators also filed a Motion for Emergency Relief, 

requesting that this Court stay the depositions of Wendy Quan, Brenda Ung, and 

Ping Chu pending resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. On September 4, 

2020, the Court denied relators’ request for emergency relief. Relators have filed a 

motion to dismiss their petition.

Accordingly, we grant relators’motion and dismiss the petition. We dismiss 

all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Lloyd, and Landau.

1 The underlying case is Wendy Quan and Brenda Ung, individually and derivatively 

on behalf of Capital Plastics Int’l, Inc., Element Plastics Mfg., Inc., and Cash 10702 

Investment, LLC, and Ping Chu and Andy Chen, derivatively on behalf of Capital 

Plastics Int’l, Inc., Element Plastics Mfg., Inc., and Cash 10702 Investment, LLC v. 

Jeff Quan, Ka Yan Lee, Harmony Quan, Mega Time II, LLC, Lawrence Lee, and 

Melody Quan, No. 20-DCV-271902, in the 240th District of Fort Bend County, 

Texas, the Honorable Frank J. Fraley presiding.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2654 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on lanthanum phosphate 

phosphor. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on lanthanum 

phosphate phosphor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LANTHANUM PHOSPHATE PHOSPHOR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.75 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 lanthanum phosphate phosphor) is amended by striking 

7 the date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/ 

8 31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2654 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# Telework

                      - Telework Handbook
                      - Safety at Home Checklist

## Human Resources

-  Human Resources Contacts 
-  Benefits 
-  eOPF 
-  Employee Relations 
-  Ethics 
-  Forms 
-  Jobs and Human Resources 
-  Telework 
-  OWCP 
-  Performance Management 
-  Rating Management 
-  Retirement 
-  Security 
-  Manager’s Corner
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ltd. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

The Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                     |  |        |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 17, 2010 |  | By:    |  | /s/    Manish Singh                  
|                     |  | Name:  |  | Manish Singh, Ph.D.                  
|                     |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### The Montauk.

*(District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.*

April Term, 1883.)

Personal Injuries to Seaman.

A seaman cannot recover for injuries resulting from his own carelessness in executing a proper order of the master.

In Admiralty. Libel for damages for personal injury.

*Willey, Sherman é Hoyt,*for libelant.

*Goulder é Weh,*for respondent.

Welker, J.

The libelant was the wheelsman on the Montauk, and while in the Sault Ste. Marie river the schooner, on the fourth of August, 1881, in tow of a tug, ran aground, and the libelant, then at the wheel executing an order of the master, was injured by the wheel spinning around and striking him. The libelant claims that the master gave him an improper order, and that, while executing it, he was injured without his fault. This is denied, and it is alleged the libelant was injured through his own carelessness. The court finds that the order given the wheelsman, from the weight, of the evidence, was a proper one; that the libelant, in executing the order, was himself guilty of carelessness, which produced the injury, and therefore not entitled to recover. The libel is dismissed, with costs, and the appeal allowed.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2815 

To extend certain housing-related deadlines in the Heartland Disaster Tax 

Relief Act of 2008. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2009 

Mr. GRASSLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend certain housing-related deadlines in the Heartland 

Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2008. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL RULES FOR USE OF 

4 RETIREMENT FUNDS. 

5 Section 702(d)(10) of the Heartland Disaster Tax 

6 Relief Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–343; 122 Stat. 3916) 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘January 1, 2010’’ both places 

9 it appears and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2011’’, and 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2815 IS

1 (2) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2009’’ both 

2 places it appears and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

3 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN CANCELLA5 TION OF INDEBTEDNESS INCOME. 

6 Section 702(e)(4)(C) of the Heartland Disaster Tax 

7 Relief Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–343; 122 Stat. 3918) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘January 1, 2010’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘January 1, 2011’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
WATSON WYATT & COMPANY
                      SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                    JURISDICTION OF        Name(s) under which
SUBSIDIARY NAME                     INCORPORATION/         such subsidiary does
                                    ORGANIZATION              business (if
                                                               different)*
---------------                     ---------------        --------------------

Watson Wyatt Argentina S.A.         Argentina
Watson Wyatt Australia Pty Ltd      Australia
Wycomp Pty Ltd                      Australia
Watson Wyatt S.A.                   Belgium
G&H Consulting Actuaries B.V.       Belgium
Watson Wyatt Brasil Ltda.           Brazil
Watson Wyatt Company Limited        Canada
Watson Wyatt Consultancy (Shanghai)
Ltd.                                China
Watson Wyatt Colombia S.A.          Colombia
Watson Wyatt S.A.R.L.               France
Watson Wyatt GmbH                   Germany
Wyatt Bode Grabner GmbH             Germany
Watson Wyatt International Pension
Trustees Ltd.                       Guernsey, Channel Islands
Watson Wyatt Hong Kong Limited      Hong Kong
Watson Wyatt Systems Ltd.           Hong Kong
Watson Wyatt India Private Limited  India
P.T. Watson Wyatt Purbajaga         Indonesia
Watson Wyatt ISSO s.r.l.            Italy
Watson Wyatt K.K.                   Japan
Watson Wyatt (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.   Malaysia
Watson Wyatt Holdings (Mauritius)
Limited                             Mauritius
Wyatt Internacional, S.A. de C.V.   Mexico
Watson Wyatt Mexico, S.A. de C.V.   Mexico
Watson Wyatt B.V.                   Netherlands
Watson Wyatt European Region B.V.   Netherlands
Watson Wyatt New Zealand Limited    New Zealand
Retirement Advisory Services (NZ)
Limited                             New Zealand
Retirement Trustees NZ Limited      New Zealand
Watson Wyatt Philippines, Inc.      Philippines
Watson Wyatt Puerto Rico, Inc.      Puerto Rico
Watson Wyatt Singapore Pte. Ltd.    Singapore
Watson Wyatt de Espana, S.A.        Spain
Watson Wyatt Lanka (Private)
Limited                             Sri Lanka
Watson Wyatt A.B.                   Sweden
Watson Wyatt AG                     Switzerland
Watson Wyatt (Thailand) Limited     Thailand
Graham & Company Limited            U.K.
PCL (1991) Limited                  U.K.
PCL Limited                         U.K.
The Wyatt Company (UK) Limited      U.K.
The Wyatt Company Holdings Limited  U.K.
Watson Wyatt Holdings (Europe)
Limited                             U.K.
Watson Wyatt Limited                U.K.
Wyatt Financial Services Limited    U.K.
Wyatt Pension Plan Trustee Limited  U.K.
Watson Wyatt Investment
Consulting, Inc.                    U.S. Delaware
Wyatt Preferred Choice, L.P.        U.S. Delaware
Wyatt Data Services, Inc.           U.S. Delaware
Wyatt Preferred Choice, L.L.C.      U.S. Delaware
Wyatt Asset Services, Inc.          U.S. Massachusetts
Watson Wyatt International, Inc.    U.S. Nevada
Watson Wyatt & Company II           U.S. Nevada


*All of these  subsidiaries  do business under their own name or under the name
Watson Wyatt Worldwide.