alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12570]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending May 16, 2009

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0110.
    Date Filed: May 11, 2009.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: June 1, 2009.
    Description: Application of Federal State Unitary Air Enterprise of 
Ministry For Emergency Situations of Russia requesting a foreign air 
carrier permit enabling it to engage in charter foreign air 
transportation of property and mail between a point or points in the 
Russian Federation and a point or points in the United States and in 
other charter trips in foreign air transportation, including between 
any point or points in the United States and any point or points in a 
third country or countries, subject to pertinent national, bilateral 
and international rules and regulations.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0116.
    Date Filed: May 12, 2009.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: June 2, 2009.
    Description: Application of Key Lime Air Corp. requesting commuter 
air carrier authorization so that it may provide scheduled passenger 
service between Denver's Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport (BJC) and 
Grand Junction, Colorado (GJT).
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2009-0120.
    Date Filed: May 14, 2009.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: June 4, 2009.
    Description: Application of Vision Airlines, Inc. (``Vision'') 
requesting an amendment to its certificate of public convenience and 
necessity which would authorize Vision to engage in scheduled 
interstate air transportation of persons, property and mail with large 
aircraft.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E9-12570 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY KEITH INGRAM, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-171, CA-97-304-1) Submitted: February 24, 1998 Decided: April 20, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney Keith Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Stanley Glaser, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no re versible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ingram , Nos. CR-95-171; CA-97-304-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,071,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               36,877,770
<ALLOWANCES>                                   708,637
<INVENTORY>                                 22,270,124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            66,694,317
<PP&E>                                     195,809,555
<DEPRECIATION>                              96,922,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             177,536,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,227,479
<BONDS>                                     60,553,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,540,190
<OTHER-SE>                                  76,355,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               177,536,677
<SALES>                                    173,809,651
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           173,809,651
<CGS>                                      133,013,945
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              133,013,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               123,584
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,472,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,203,841
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,348,236
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,855,605
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,855,605
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.92


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
 
 Cistera Networks Announces Second Quarter Profit
 2Q 10 EPS of $0.02c per share
 th ® th
     About Cistera Networks, Inc.




---



##### 



Convergence Server www.cistera.com
 This release may be deemed to contain forward-looking statements that are subject to the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements
include, among other things, statements regarding future events and the future financial
performance of Cistera Networks that involve risks and uncertainties. Readers are cautioned that
these forward-looking statements are only predictions and may differ materially from actual future
events or results. Readers are referred to the documents filed by Cistera Networks with the SEC,
specifically the most recent reports on Form 10-K and 10-Q, each as it may be amended from time to
time, which identify important risk factors that could cause actual results to differ from those
contained in the forward-looking statements.
 Media and Investor Contact:
972-381-4699 x75003  investors@cistera.com
**Exhibit 15.2**
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of KT Corporationon Form F-3 (No. 333-100251) of our reports dated March 25, 2005, relating to our audits of thefinancial statements of KT Freetel Co., Ltd. (which reports express an unqualified opinion andinclude explanatory paragraphs relating to the merger of KT Freetel Co., Ltd. with KT ICOM Co.,Ltd.), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of KT Corporation for the three years endedDecember 31, 2004, and to the reference to our firm under the heading “Experts” in the RegistrationStatement on Form F-3 of KT Corporation.
/s/ Deloitte HanaAnjin LLC
Seoul, Korea
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2633 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain tamper resistant ground fault 

circuit interrupter receptacles. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain tamper resistant 

ground fault circuit interrupter receptacles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN TAMPER RESISTANT GROUND FAULT 

4 CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER RECEPTACLES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2633 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter Receptacles with protective internal shutter to 

prevent insertion of foreign 

objects thereby giving the 

GFCI receptacle the property 

of being ‘tamper resistant’, 

clearly marked TR on receptacle face plate, meeting the 

2008 National Electric Code 

Section 406.11, for 15 A or 

20 A (provided for in subheading 8536.30.80) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1



                             TUSCARORA INCORPORATED
                EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three Months Ended November 30,
                                                      -------------------------------
                                                            1997              1996
                                                           ------            ------
                                                   (In thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                                         <C>               <C>  
PRIMARY
     Weighted average number of shares of
          Common Stock outstanding                          9,476             9,424
     Net effect of dilutive stock options -
          based on the treasury stock method
          using average market price                          225               159
                                                           ------            ------

               TOTAL                                        9,701             9,583
                                                           ======            ======

     Net income                                            $3,772            $3,692
                                                           ======            ======

     Per share amount                                      $  .39            $  .39
                                                           ======            ======

FULLY DILUTED
     Weighted average number of shares of
          Common Stock outstanding                          9,476             9,424
     Net effect of dilutive stock options -
          based on the treasury stock method
          using greater of average market price
          or closing market price                             225               160
                                                           ------            ------

               TOTAL                                        9,701             9,584
                                                           ======            ======

     Net income                                            $3,772            $3,692
                                                           ======            ======

     Per share amount                                      $  .39            $  .39
                                                           ======            ======
</TABLE>


                                       13
-  Home 
        -  Research & Funding 
        -  Current Funding Opportunities 
        -  HEAL Initiative: Interdisciplinary Team Science to Uncover the Mechanisms of Pain Relief by Medical Devices (RM1 Clinical Trial Optional) 

View Current Funding Opportunities

# HEAL Initiative: Interdisciplinary Team Science to Uncover the Mechanisms of Pain Relief by Medical Devices (RM1 Clinical Trial Optional)

More than 25 million Americans suffer from daily chronic pain, a highly debilitating medical condition that is complex and difficult to manage. In recent decades, there has been an overreliance in the prescription of opioids for chronic pain despite their poor ability to improve function and high addiction liability. This contributed to a significant and alarming epidemic of opioid overdose deaths and addictions. Innovative scientific solutions to develop alternative pain treatment options are thus critically needed.Through targeted research efforts, the NIH HEAL Initiative aims to support the development of safe and effective devices to treat pain with little or no addiction liability. This funding opportunity announcement (FOA) is designed to support interdisciplinary research teams of multiple PD/PIs to investigate the mechanism of action of pain relief by medical devices with the overall goal of optimizing therapeutic outcomes for FDA-approved or -cleared technologies. Program teams are expected to accomplish goals that require considerable synergy and collaborative interactions. Teams must leverage appropriate multi-disciplinary expertise to develop new principles and methods for experimentation, analysis, and interpretation. Teams are encouraged to consider objectives that will produce major advances in the field of pain relief by medical devices.

### Funding Opportunity Details

Full Announcement:RFA-NS-23-003Related Notices or Announcements:NOT-NS-23-057; NOT-OD-23-012; NOT-OD-22-190

Program Contact:Dana K. Andersen, M.D.

### Key Dates

Open Date:            9/10/2022        

Letter of Intent Due Date:            30 days prior to the application due date
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2705 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2705

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 191.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Whitehouse (for himself and Mr. Reed) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 191.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 191.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Benzenesulfonic     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        acid, 4-chloro-2-                                                  31/2011.......
                        [[4,5-dihydro-3-
                        methyl-5-oxo-1-(3-
                        sulfophenyl)-1H-
                        pyrazol-4-yl]azo]-
                        5-methyl-,
                        calcium salt
                        (1:1) (CAS No.
                        129423-54-7)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3204.17.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

KENNETH TYLER CARY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 938 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
EXHIBIT 23(b)    NOTICE REGARDING LACK OF CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") provides that any person acquiring a security pursuant to a registration statement may
assert a claim against every accountant who has with its consent been named as having prepared or certified any part of the registration statement, or as having prepared or certified any report or
valuation that is used in connection with the registration statement, if that part of the registration statement at the time it becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or
omits a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such
untruth or omission).

The
Form 10-K to which this notice is filed as an exhibit is incorporated by reference into the following registration statement (the "Registration Statement") filed
by Haggar Corp. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), and, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, is deemed to be a new registration
statement for the Registration Statement into which it is incorporated by reference:



On
April 1, 2002, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company dismissed Arthur Anderson LLP ("Arthur Andersen") as its independent auditors and engaged
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PWC") to serve as its independent auditors for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002. The decision to dismiss Arthur Andersen and engage PWC was made by the
Company's Audit Committee and was effective immediately. For additional information, see the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 2, 2002. The
Company has been unable to obtain Arthur Andersen's written consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements of Arthur Andersen's audit report with respect to the Company's
consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2001, and for the fiscal year then ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits the Company to file
this Form 10-K without a written consent from Arthur Andersen. As a result, however, Arthur Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for
any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you would be
unable to assert a claim against Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any purchases of the Company's securities pursuant to the Registration Statement made on or after
the date of this Form 10-K. To the extent provided in Section 11(b)(3)(C) of the Securities Act, however, other persons who are liable under Section 11(a) of the
Securities Act, including the Company's officers and directors, may still rely on Arthur Andersen's original audit reports as being made by an expert for purposes of establishing a due diligence
defense under Section 11(b) of the Securities Act.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

 (i)           the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

 (ii)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   | Dated: April 19, 2007 | /s/ Douglas G. Markham   |
|--------|-----------------------|------------------------------------|

|   | Douglas G. Markham |
|--------|--------------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|
#### State v. Hayes

Case below: 183 N.C. App. - (5 June 2007)

No. 323P07

Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-1152)

Denied 10/11/07
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 102 

Condemning the decision by the city of St. Denis, France, to name a street 

in honor of Mumia Abu-Jamal, the convicted murderer of Philadelphia 

Police Officer Danny Faulkner. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 15, 2006 

Mr. SANTORUM submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Condemning the decision by the city of St. Denis, France, 

to name a street in honor of Mumia Abu-Jamal, the 

convicted murderer of Philadelphia Police Officer Danny 

Faulkner. 

Whereas on the night of December 9, 1981, Police Officer 

Danny Faulkner was shot and killed in cold blood during 

a traffic stop in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 

Whereas in the process of arresting the driver of a car traveling the wrong way down a one-way street, the driver’s 

brother appeared from across the street and proceeded to 

open fire on Officer Faulkner while his back was turned 

away; 

Whereas the driver’s brother was identified as Mumia AbuJamal; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•SCON 102 IS

Whereas Mumia Abu-Jamal shot Officer Faulkner 4 times in 

the back; 

Whereas, although seriously injured, Officer Faulkner returned fire, striking his attacker; 

Whereas Mumia Abu-Jamal was undeterred and stood over 

Officer Faulkner and shot him in the face, mortally 

wounding him; 

Whereas Mumia Abu-Jamal attempted to flee, but collapsed 

several feet from the slain Officer Faulkner, murder 

weapon in hand; 

Whereas Mumia Abu-Jamal was charged and convicted of 

first degree murder by a jury of his peers; 

Whereas Mumia Abu-Jamal has had numerous legal appeals, 

including appeals to the Pennsylvania State Supreme 

Court and the United States Supreme Court, and his 

conviction has been upheld each time; 

Whereas, on April 29, 2006, the municipal government of St. 

Denis, a suburb of Paris, dedicated a street in the honor 

of Mumia Abu-Jamal; and 

Whereas the official recognition and celebration of a convicted murderer of a police officer of the United States 

is an affront to law enforcement officers across the Nation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) condemns the murder of Philadelphia Police 

4 Officer Danny Faulkner; 

5 (2) urges the municipal government of St. 

6 Denis to take immediate action to change the name 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•SCON 102 IS

1 of Rue Mumia Abu-Jamal and, if such action is not 

2 taken by the municipal government of St. Denis, 

3 urges the Government of France to take appropriate 

4 action against the city of St. Denis to change the 

5 name of Rue Mumia Abu-Jamal; and 

6 (3) commends all police officers in the United 

7 States and throughout the world for their commit8 ment to public service and public safety. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS