alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 733.

#### Friedman *v.*United States.

January 12, 1942.

*Mr. John H. Burnett*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Fahy*and *Messrs. J. Louis Monarch, Gordon B. Tweedy,*and *Earl C. Crouter*for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied. Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
exv10w54



 





Exhibit 10.54




Management Incentive Plan (MIP)

Fiscal Year 2008



The Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”) applies to designated Executive Officers of the Company and
is designed to link a portion of a participant’s cash compensation to demonstrated performance. A
participant has an opportunity to earn incentive awards based on Company Performance, Unit or Work
Team Performance and Personal Performance results during the fiscal year. This document is the
sole document which governs the administration of MIP awards.



The MIP is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”).
The Committee has the authority to interpret and administer all provisions and to make any rules
and regulations or take any action it deems necessary including amendments or revocation. All
awards issued under the MIP are at the sole discretion of the Committee.



Incentive Awards made pursuant to the MIP are determined and distributed annually following
completion of the Company’s fiscal year. The Committee may elect to issue interim awards in
conjunction with the Company’s mid-year performance review process. Incentive Awards may be
prorated to account for partial Plan Year participation. Incentive awards will generally be
distributed to participants within 90 calendar days following the end of the fiscal year.



Incentive awards under the MIP are determined based upon funding availability for the award pool,
the performance of each Participant’s assigned Business Unit or Work Team and Personal Performance
against established performance goals. In general, annual incentive awards under the MIP target
fifty percent of base salary at the time of determination and cumulative annual awards to any
Participant will not exceed that Participant’s annual base salary received during the relevant Plan
Year.



Company performance is defined as the extent to which the Company attains established financial
goals tied to the achievement of both revenue and net income targets as established by the
Committee at the beginning of the fiscal year. Business unit or work team performance is defined
as the extent to which a participant’s assigned business unit or work team achieves targeted
results while adhering to budgeted resources.



All Incentive Awards under the MIP are in the form of cash payments, less applicable tax
withholding, as determined by the Committee.



Financial results associated with business acquisitions, divestitures, share repurchase activity,
changes in the economy or markets served by the Company which substantially impact results attained
during the Plan Year may be excluded from the results used to calculate Incentive Awards. The
Committee will determine, in its sole discretion, whether such events have occurred and the extent
to which, if at all, goals should be adjusted.



Participation in the MIP is limited to designated Executive Officers (other than the Chief
Executive Officer) of the Company and any other senior leader the Committee specifically
designates.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 24 (Friday, February 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 6306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2518]



[[Page 6306]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations and Related Actions

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing or related actions in the National Register were received by 
the National Park Service before January 24, 2009.
    Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60 written comments 
concerning the significance of these properties under the National 
Register criteria for evaluation may be forwarded by United States 
Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic Places, National 
Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., 2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all other 
carriers, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 
1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202-371-
6447. Written or faxed comments should be submitted by February 23, 
2009.

J. Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks 
Program.

IOWA

Polk County

Methodist Deaconess Institute--Esther Hall, 921 Pleasant St., Des 
Moines, 09000067

NEBRASKA

Burt County

Burt County State Bank, 246 S. 13th St., Tekamah, 09000068

Douglas County

Nicholas Street Historic District, Bounded by N. 11th St., Izard, N. 
14th St. and a line parallel to and roughly 450' N. of Nicholas St., 
Omaha, 09000070
Parker, Frank, Archeological Site (Archeological Resources of the 
Metro Omaha Management Unit MPS), Address Restricted, Florence, 
09000069

Lincoln County

North Platte U.S. Post Office and Federal Building, 416 N. Jeffers 
St., North Platte, 09000071

OKLAHOMA

Craig County

Little Cabin Creek Bridge (Route 66 in Oklahoma MPS), U.S. 60/69 
over Little Cabin Creek, SE of jct with U.S. 44, Vinita, 09000072

Kay County

Huston Elementary School, 304 Vinnedge, Blackwell, 09000073
Northside Elementary School, 720 W. Doolin Ave., Blackwell, 09000074
Parkside Elementary School, 502 E. College, Blackwell, 09000075
Washington Elementary School, 723 W. College, Blackwell, 09000076

Nowata County

Opossum Creek Bridge, Co. Rd. NS-413 over Opossum Creek, South 
Coffeyville, 09000077

Payne County

Reifsnyder, Josephine, Luston House (Lustron Houses of Oklahoma), 
2119 Sherwood, Stillwater, 09000078
Usher, Christian K., Luston House (Lustron Houses of Oklahoma), 1135 
E. Moses, Cushing, 09000079

Washington County

House at 1554 SW Rogers (Lustron Houses of Oklahoma), 1554 SW 
Rogers, Bartlesville, 09000080

[FR Doc. E9-2518 Filed 2-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25151]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,783]


Coherent-Deos, LLC, Including Workers Whose UI Wages Are Reported 
to Albany Services, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers From ATR 
International, Inc., et al.; Connecticut; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on January 23, 2009, applicable to workers of 
Coherent-DEOS, LLC, Bloomfield, Connecticut. The notice was published 
in the Federal Register on February 10, 2009 (74 FR 6653). The notice 
was amended on August 31, 2009 include on-site leased workers ATR 
International, Inc., Coworx PPS, LLC, Stewart Staffing Solutions, 888 
Consulting Group and Roth Staffing Co and to include workers whose UI 
wages were reported Albany Services, Inc. The notice was published in 
the Federal Register on September 22, 2009 (74 FR 48296).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of air-cooled carbon dioxide lasers.
    Information shows that workers leased from Ultimate Staffing 
Services and TAC Worldwide were employed on-site at the Bloomfield, 
Connecticut location of Coherent-DEOS, LLC. The Department has 
determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of 
the subject firm to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers eased from Ultimate Staffing Services 
and TAC Worldwide working on-site at the Bloomfield, Connecticut 
location of Coherent-DEOS, LLC.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-64,783 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Coherent-DEOS, LLC, including workers whose UI 
wages are reported to Albany Services, Inc., and including on-site 
leased workers from ATR International, Inc., Coworx PPS, LLC, 
Stewart Staffing Solutions, 888 Consulting Group, Roth Staffing 
Company, Ultimate Staffing Services and TAC Worldwide, Bloomfield, 
Connecticut, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after December 26, 2007, through January 23, 2011, 
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of 
the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for 
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of October 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-25151 Filed 10-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             497
<SECURITIES>                                     3,741<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,556
<ALLOWANCES>                                       657
<INVENTORY>                                      6,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,130
<PP&E>                                          12,146
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,949
<BONDS>                                         11,523
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           323
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,350
<SALES>                                         25,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,676
<CGS>                                           18,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,795<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   660
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,453
<INCOME-TAX>                                       531
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                901
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       901
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.57
<FN>
<F1>Represents retained interest in transferred credit card receivables
<F2>Represents the sum of selling and administrative expense, depreciation and
amortization expense.
</FN>


</TABLE>
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-09-00714- CV In re G eorge Gar za ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM H AY S CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The part i es to this petition for writ of mandamus have filed an agree d motion to dismiss . We gr ant the motion and dismiss t he petition.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Waldrop Filed: January

8, 2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2014

t0127

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2014

147801

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147801

COA: 301622

Wayne CC: 10-004848-FC

PETER NORMAN DABISH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 13, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 14 (Friday, January 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Alaska, California, Hawaii, and Nevada)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, March 18, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227, or 
(206) 220-6098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, March 18, 2009, at 2 p.m. Pacific Time. You can submit 
written comments to the panel by faxing the comments to 206-220-5760, 
or write to Janice Spinks, TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, 
Seattle, WA 98174. Due to limited conference lines, notification of 
intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be 
made with Janice Spinks. Ms. Spinks can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098, or you can contact us at http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 13, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E9-1274 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Order filed October 4, 2016

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________

No. 11-16-00113-CR

__________

RUSSELL FRANCES HUERTAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 161st District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. B-44,756

O R D E R

This appeal has become stalled due to the failure of Joel Rodriguez, the court 

reporter for the 161st District Court, to prepare and file in this court the reporter’s 

record. The reporter’s record was originally due on May 23, 2016. Rodriguez has 

filed four requests for extensions, two of which were granted and two of which were

granted in part. We granted Rodriguez’s fourth request on August 26, 2016, and we
2

directed that the reporter’s record be filed on or before September 21, 2016. As of 

today, Rodriguez has not filed the reporter’s record in this cause. 

By this order, Joel Rodriguez is ORDERED to file the reporter’s record 

in this cause on or before 5:00 p.m. on October 20, 2016. If the reporter’s record 

has not been filed by that time, Rodriguez may be required to appear in person before 

the Eleventh Court of Appeals to explain the delay. 

PER CURIAM

October 4, 2016

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2553 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2553

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3-(Ethylsulfonyl)-2-
                          pyridinesulfonamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

  Mr. Burris introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3-(Ethylsulfonyl)-2-
                          pyridinesulfonamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-(ETHYLSULFONYL)-2-PYRIDINESULFONAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.33.63 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3-(Ethylsulfonyl)-2-
pyridinesulfonamide) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jacob Katz, Respondent, v Benedetto Marra, Appellant.

Decided September 21, 2010

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not

*838finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
April 10 , 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JAMES O. AINSWORTH, JR. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00502

- CV V.
CACH, LLC , Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee , CACH, LLC, signed May 4, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

.
We order appellant, JAMES O. AINSWORTH, JR., to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Hoskie Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, v Jeffrey Wu et al., Respondents.

[978 NYS2d 838]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered December 10, 2012, which, insofar as appealed from, in this action alleging, inter alia, breach of contract, granted defendants’ motion to renew, and, upon renewal, vacated a default judgment previously entered against defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs’ complaint overlapped a prior pending action in which some defendants were involved, and which was being defended actively by an entity that plaintiffs contend is the alter ego of defendants. Thus, a default against defendants should not have been granted by the original motion court here, particularly where the error was compounded by the lack of any party affidavit as to the alter-ego allegations. Accordingly, in light of the strong policy in favor of the resolution of disputes on the merits, the court did not abuse its discretion in finding this to be one of the instances in which the interest of justice was served by the grant of renewal and the vacatur of the default despite defendants’ failure to timely respond to the original motion *(see Tishman Constr. Corp. of N.Y. v City of New York,*280 AD2d 374, 376-377 [1st Dept 2001]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
#### Charter School for Applied Technologies et al., Respondents, v Board of Education for City School District of City of Buffalo, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[963 NYS2d 919]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J), entered March 30, 2012. The judgment awarded plaintiffs the sum of $6,873,646.91 against defendant.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously vacated without costs, the amended order entered March 5, 2012 is modified on the law by denying those parts of plaintiffs’ motion with respect to the first and second causes of action in their entirety and by granting defendant summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action, and as modified the amended order is affirmed and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for a trial on the issue of liability.

Same memorandum as in *Charter School for Applied Tech. v Board of Educ. for City School Dist. of City of Buffalo*(105 AD3d 1460 [2013]).

Present—Smith, J.E, Peradotto, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
U.S. Bank National Association 2121 Cliff Drive, #205 Eagan, MN 55122 Attention: WMLT Series 2007-A

Re: Annual Compliance Statement for WMLT 2007-A
In connection with the loans serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. (the "Company") pursuant to the Company's  Servicing Agreement(s)/Purchase and Sale Agreement(s) with  Wachovia Bank, National Association and any applicable Reconstitution Agreement(s) (together, the "Transaction Agreements"), I, the undersigned officer, hereby certify the following as of December 31, 2007:
(i)

The Company conducted a review of its activities during the immediately preceding calendar year (or applicable portion thereof) and of its performance under the Transaction Agreements
during such period has been made under my supervision; and
(ii)

To the best of my  knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Transaction Agreements in all material respects throughout such calendar year (or applicable portion thereof), except as follows:


SunTrust Mortgage did not maintain the required fidelity bond coverage amount in accordance with Sec.229.1122(d)(i)(iv) at all times during 2007. The Company maintained fidelity bond coverage in the amount of $150MM throughout calendar year 2007, which was determined to
be insufficient according to applicable FNMA transaction agreement terms. This deficiency was an issue for limited portions of the year and resulted from an increase in the volume of the servicing portfolio. SunTrust Mortgage has requested a waiver from FNMA stating this coverage amount is adequate without regard for the size of the residential servicing portfolio, subject to an annual FNMA review. FNMA has verbally agreed to this request, and SunTrust Mortgage is working to formalize this agreement.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereby certify the foregoing as of the date hereof.

/s/ John R. Purcell, Jr

John R. Purcell, Jr. Senior Vice President  Manager, Servicing Division

Date:   March 12, 2008
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)
the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  April 14, 2011                                                                      /s/ Douglas G. Markham


Douglas G. Markham


Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer