alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Returns Warehouse

The Returns Warehouse works closely with the Great Basin Incident Support Cache. When equipment is returned from a wildland fire, it is sent to the Returns Warehouse for refurbishing and preparation for when it is next needed. A shovel, Pulaski or other tool may be used on a dozen or more wildland fires in an active fire year. 

## More About Us

-  What is NIFC?    -  Great Basin Cache 
  -  Great Basin Smokejumpers 
  -  NICC 
  -  Radio Cache 
  -  RAWS 
  -  Returns Warehouse 
  -  Wildland Firefighters Monument 
-  NIFC Campus 
-  Our Partners 
-  NIFC History 
-  Working with  Us 
-  NIFC Help Desk 
-  Social Media 
-  Media Submission
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 Nos.
333-115636, 333-123940, 333-135038 and 333-138303 and Form S-8 No. 127527 of our report
dated March 30, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Derma
Sciences, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006.

| |                      
| | ---------------------
| | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaMarch 30, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial OfficerPursuant
to U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
John E. Yetter, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Derma Sciences, Inc., hereby
certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 of
Derma Sciences, Inc. (the Form 10-KSB) upon my best knowledge and belief fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Derma Sciences,
Inc.

|Dated:  March 31, 2008 | /s/ John E. YetterJohn E. Yetter, CPA
     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Military aircraft equipped with MAFFS mobilized to assist with wildfire suppression

nr_nifc_maffs_activation_08.03.23.pdf

## Other News Releases

                            - Military aircraft equipped with MAFFS mobilized to assist with wildfire suppression
                            - US firefighters continue to support Canada during record-breaking wildfires
                            - NIFC celebrates second annual National Wildland Firefighter Day 
                            - U.S. supports Canada with aviation resources
                            - U.S. fire resources continue to support Canada
                            - U.S. resources support Canadian wildfires

**For Release:** August 03, 2023

**Contact:**Stanton Florea, 208-387-5437, stanton.florea@usda.gov

The USDA Forest Service is activating two Department of Defense C-130 aircraft equipped with Modular Airborne Firefighting Systems (MAFFS) to assist with increased fire activity in several western states. The aircraft, from the 153rd Airlift Wing, Wyoming Air National Guard, from Cheyenne, Wyoming, and the 302nd Airlift Wing, Air Force Reserve Command, Peterson Space Force Base, Colorado, will join the USDA Forest Service and other state and federal agencies fighting wildfires across the west. The two aircraft are available from the Klamath Falls Airtanker Base in Klamath Falls, Oregon, beginning today. 

Having military C-130s that can be converted into airtankers provides a critical “surge” capability that can be used to bolster wildfire suppression efforts when commercial airtankers are fully committed or not readily available.

The C-130 aircraft are equipped with the U.S. Forest Service’s MAFFS, which can drop up to 3,000 gallons of fire retardant in less than 10 seconds across a quarter-mile line. The system slides into the back of the military aircraft, and retardant is released through a nozzle on the rear left side. In addition to the 153rd and 302nd Airlift Wings, the 146th Airlift Wing, California Air National Guard, and the 152nd Airlift Wing, Nevada Air National Guard are also part of the national MAFFS program, which includes a total of eight C-130 aircraft.

On July 21, the National Wildland Fire Preparedness Level was elevated to 3 (out of 5), reflecting increased wildland fire activity across the U.S. The level was raised by the National Multi-Agency Coordination Group, composed of wildland fire representatives from each wildland fire agency based at the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) in Boise, Idaho.

For more information on MAFFS, visit: https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/fire/planes/maffs.

For photos and videos of the MAFFS program, visit: www.dvidshub.net/feature/MAFFSAEG.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 248 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 248

 To prohibit the use of certain interrogation techniques and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 14, 2009

   Mr. Bond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
            referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of certain interrogation techniques and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Limitations on Interrogation 
Techniques Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF CERTAIN INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES.

    (a) In General.--No individual in the custody or under the 
effective control of personnel of an element of the intelligence 
community or instrumentality of an element of the intelligence 
community, regardless of nationality or physical location of the 
individual or personnel, shall be subject to the following 
interrogation techniques--
            (1) forcing the individual to be naked, perform sexual 
        acts, or pose in a sexual manner;
            (2) placing hoods or sacks over the head of the individual 
        or using duct tape over the individual's eyes;
            (3) applying beatings, electric shock, burns, or similar 
        forms of physical pain;
            (4) using the technique known as waterboarding;
            (5) using military working dogs;
            (6) inducing hypothermia or heat injury;
            (7) conducting mock executions; or
            (8) depriving the individual of adequate food, water or 
        medical care.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Instrumentality.--The term ``instrumentality'', with 
        respect to an element of the intelligence community, means a 
        contractor or subcontractor at any tier of the element of the 
        intelligence community.
            (2) Intelligence community.--The term ``intelligence 
        community'' has the meaning given that term in section 3(4) of 
        the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a(4)).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2692 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2692

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain laminated rolled filmstock.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain laminated rolled filmstock.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN LAMINATED ROLLED FILMSTOCK.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Laminated film of   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        polyethylene, in                                                   31/2011.......
                        rolls, printed,
                        with an overall
                        thickness of
                        approximately
                        0.114 mm or more
                        but not over
                        0.185 mm
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3926.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

In connection with this Annual Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Zach L. Wasson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |     |  |                                                                               
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 23, 2010 |  | by: |  | /s/ Zach L. Wasson                                                            
|                         |  |     |  | Zach L. Wasson                                                                
|                         |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Sterling Bancshares, Inc.
Exhibit 32.3








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)
the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  April 14, 2011                                                                       /s/ Brian W. White


Brian W. White


Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 3/31/99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,161
<ALLOWANCES>                                       901
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,654
<PP&E>                                          51,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          195,656
<BONDS>                                        165,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,498
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           188
<OTHER-SE>                                    (62,860)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   142,484
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,783
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,749
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,688)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,688)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,688)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.59)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ted I. Kaminer, Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc.        Dated: August 9, 2007 /s/ Ted I. Kaminer*   Ted I. Kaminer, Senior Vice President and Chief   Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Crawford, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 374]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Griffin, J.), rendered October 7, 2010, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Paynter, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the People’s contention, the record does not demonstrate that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal *(see People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257 [2011]). The defendant’s purported waiver of the right to appeal is unenforceable, as the record does not indicate that he had “ £a full appreciation of the consequences’ ” of such waiver *(id.*at 264, quoting *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 11 [1989]). While the defendant signed a written waiver, a written waiver “is not a complete substitute for *an on-the-record explanation of the nature of the right to appeal,*and some acknowledgment that the defendant is voluntarily giving up *1057that right” *(People v Bradshaw,*76 AD3d 566, 569 [2010], *affd*18 NY3d 257 [2011] [emphasis added]; *see People v Pelaez,*100 AD3d 803, 804 [2012]). Accordingly, in the absence of a knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver of the right to appeal, the defendant retained his right to challenge the denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony *(see*CPL 710.20 [2]; *People v Jacob,*94 AD3d 1142, 1144 [2012]; *People v Bradshaw,*76 AD3d at 570).

Nevertheless, the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony. The record supports the hearing court’s determination that, under the circumstances of this case, the police had reasonable suspicion to stop and detain the defendant *(see People v Hicks,*78 AD3d 1075, 1075-1076 [2010]; *People v Mais,*71 AD3d 1163 [2010]; *see also People v Williams,*73 AD3d 1097, 1099 [2010]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the police were justified in displaying a firearm and using handcuffs to detain him since, as they approached him, they reasonably believed that they were faced with a rapidly developing and dangerous situation presenting an imminent threat to their well-being *(see People v Allen,*73 NY2d 378, 380 [1989]). Moreover, under the circumstances of this case, the employment of those precautionary measures did not transform the detention of the defendant into a full-blown arrest *(see People v Allen,*73 NY2d at 380; *People v Tiribio,*88 AD3d 534, 535 [2011]; *People v Worthy,*308 AD2d 555 [2003]). Accordingly, contrary to the defendant’s contention, there was no need for the police to establish probable cause prior to detaining him, and the alleged lack of probable cause did not taint or render invalid a subsequent showup identification of the defendant.

Dillon, J.P, Angiolillo, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         731,145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 731,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,907
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     630,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   731,145
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               237,069
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  217,824
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (4,933,051)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,949,743
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,949,743
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,949,743
<EPS-BASIC>                                      18.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    18.93


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification**
I, Stephen J. Hansbrough, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HearUSA, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis l report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;   b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: May 10, 2005
/s/ Stephen J. HansbroughStephen J.Hansbrough