alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of HFB Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the six-month transition period ended December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David B. Cook, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

         March 25, 2003                   /s/ David B. Cook
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          David B. Cook
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Baker v. Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc.

Case below: 180 N.C. App. 296

No. 642P06

Pit-Appellant’s (Walter E. Sudderth) PDR (COA05-1618)

Denied 06/27/07

Martin, J., Recused
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 53763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25160]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,784]


Oval International; Hoquiam, WA; Notice of Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated August 26, 2009, a petitioner requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on 
August 6, 2009. The Notice of Determination was published in the 
Federal Register on September 2, 2009 (74 FR 45474).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of pulp bale strapping machines and 
spare parts did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the 
subject firm. The investigation revealed that the subject firm did not 
shift production of pulp bale strapping machines and spare parts to 
foreign countries during the period under investigation.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleged that 
employment at the subject firm was negatively impacted by a shift in 
production of spare parts abroad. To support the allegation, the 
petition supplied additional documentation.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of September 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-25160 Filed 10-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101 (Thursday, May 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12347]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold Closed Meetings on Wednesday, May 27, 
2009 at 1 p.m. and Thursday, May 28, 2009 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meetings. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meetings.
    Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the item 
listed for the Closed Meetings in closed sessions, and determined that 
no earlier notice of the May 27, 2009 Closed Meeting was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
May 27, 2009 will be: Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; 
and other matters related to enforcement proceedings.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
May 28, 2009 will be: Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; 
institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature; an opinion; and other matters related to 
enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: May 21, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12347 Filed 5-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02
- 14
- 00227
- CV Black Bull Towing, LLC and 5620 TX Lincoln Arlington, LLC d/b/a Whispering Woods

v.

Pete E. Ybarra § § § § From County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County (2013

- 004651

- 1)

June 11 , 2015 Opinion by Justice Dixon W. Holman



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ord ered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. We affirm the trial court’s summary judgment for Pete E. Ybarra on his Towing and Booting Act claims based on a violation of the signage requirements of sections 2308.301 and .302 of the Act. But we reverse the trial court’s award of $1,000 plus triple the amount of towing charges for each tow, and we remand the case for further proceedings on Pete E. Ybarra’s claim for increased statutory dama ges under section 2308.404(c)

.It is further ordered that Black Bull Towing, LLC, 5620 TX Lincoln Arlington, LLC d/b/a Whispering Woods, and Pete E. Ybarra shall bear their own costs of appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dixon W. Holman Justice Dixon W. Holman
#### Glendalyn Downing, Appellant, v Tomas Moskovits et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[873 NYS2d 320]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silverman, J.), dated July 10, 2007, as denied those branches of her motion which were to compel the defendants Tomas Moskovits and Crystal Group, LLC, to respond to interrogatories and certain document requests, and granted so much of the cross motion of those defendants as sought a protective order striking the interrogatories and document requests.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

“ ‘The supervision of discovery, and the setting of reasonable terms and conditions for disclosure, are within the sound discretion of the Supreme Court’ ” *(Olexa v Jacobs,*36 AD3d 776, 777 [2007], quoting *Ito v Dryvit Sys.,*5 AD3d 735 [2004]). “ ‘Under our discovery statutes and case law, competing interests must always be balanced; the need for discovery must be weighed against any special burden to be borne by the opposing party’ ” *(Kavanagh v Ogden Allied Maintenance Corp.,*92 NY2d 952, *672954 [1998], quoting *O’Neill v Oakgrove Constr.,*71 NY2d 521, 529 [1988]). Here, upon balancing the parties’ interests, the Supreme Court properly determined, inter alia, that the defendants Tomas Moskovits and Crystal Group, LLC (hereinafter the defendants), had already provided sufficient answers to interrogatories. The interrogatories and document requests, other than those which resulted in the responses already provided by the defendants, were overbroad and improper *(see Stever v Stever,*10 AD3d 358, 359 [2004]; *Botsas v Grossman,*7 AD3d 654, 655 [2004]; *EIFS, Inc. v Morie Co.,*298 AD2d 548, 549 [2002]), with the exception of the court’s determination that the defendants were to provide all correspondence between themselves, as well as with the plaintiff, related to the subject real estate transaction. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the plaintiffs motion which were to compel the defendants to respond to interrogatories and certain document requests.

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.E, Santucci, Garni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2667 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to modify 

the tariffs of engines with cylinder capacity of less than 1 liter, designed 

for motor vehicles of heading 8709. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States to modify the tariffs of engines with cylinder 

capacity of less than 1 liter, designed for motor vehicles 

of heading 8709. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENGINES TO BE INSTALLED IN WORK TRUCKS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 84 of the Harmonized 

5 Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by insert6 ing in numerical sequence the following new subheading, 

7 with the article description for subheading 8408.20.30 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2667 IS

1 having the same degree of indentation as the article de2 scription for subheading 8408.20.20: 

‘‘ 8408.20.30 With cylinder capacity of less than 

1 liter, designed for motor vehicles 

of heading 8709 .............................. Free 35% ’’. 

3 (b) REDESIGNATION.—Chapter 84 of the Har4 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

5 by redesignating subheading 8408.20.90 as 8408.20.91. 

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

8 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

9 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    The notice published in the May 8, 2009,                     **Federal Register**                     (74 FR 21698) announcing the opportunity to register to attend the July 28-29, 2009,  NIH-sponsored workshop entitled “Soy Protein and Isoflavones Research: Challenges in Designing and Evaluating Intervention Studies” contains an errant e-mail address for registration purposes. More specifically, the e-mail address provided in line 8 of the Registration section of the notice should read:                     *twallich@csionweb.com.*                     If you do not have access to e-mail, please call Ms. Wallich at 301-670-0270 (not a toll-free number).                

Dated: May 11, 2009.

Paul M. Coates,

Director, Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. E9-11488 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Grants 
-  Funding Opportunities 

# Potato Breeding Research

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

The purpose of this grant program is to support potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) research programs that focus on varietal development and testing and potato varieties for commercial production. As used herein, varietal development and testing is research using conventional breeding and/or biotechnological genetics to develop improved potato varieties. Aspects of evaluation, screening and testing must support variety development.

The technical assistance webinar related to this FY 2023 funding opportunity is now available via the button below.

**Reasonable Accommodations and Language Access Services: **If you need a reasonable accommodation to participate in any of the informational webinars listed, please contact the event host listed no later than 10 days prior to the event. NIFA offers language access services, such as interpretation and translation of vital information, free of charge. If you need interpretation or translation services, please visit NIFA Language Access Services or contact Lois Tuttle, Equal Opportunity Specialist, at Lois.Tuttle@usda.gov  or (443) 386-9488.

Apply For GrantDownload RFATechnical Assistance Webinar

NIFA Language Access Services

Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics Programs

Applications may only be submitted by state agricultural experiment stations, land-grant colleges and universities, research foundations established by land-grant colleges and universities, colleges and universities receiving funds under the Act of October 10, 1962, as amended (16 USC 582a et seq.), and accredited schools or colleges of veterinary medicine.

Thursday, April 6, 2023

Thomas (Tom)  Bewick

Thursday, May 18, 2023

grantapplicationquestions@usda.gov

https://go.usa.gov/xne4W

FY-21-Potato-Breeding-Research-508.pdf(pdf - 186.22 KB)

Plants

Plant Breeding
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
                                  EXHIBIT 27.1
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE LIFSCHULTZ INDUSTRIES, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED
IN THIS REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                          APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                    544,000
<SECURITIES>                                              929,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                           3,258,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                             3,955,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        9,163,000
<PP&E>                                                  4,417,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         16,179,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   2,075,000
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                    1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                             11,723,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           16,179,000
<SALES>                                                13,846,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       13,846,000
<CGS>                                                   7,724,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           7,724,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        4,734,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         58,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         1,330,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                               74,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     1,256,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                            1,256,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0.97


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.45
 AMENDMENT NO. 2  TO  LICENSING AGREEMENT
      Consent to Sublicense
 Waiver of Royalties
   WIDMER BROTHERS BREWING COMPANY
    
    
    
    REDHOOK ALE BREWERY
INCORPORATEDBy:
    
    /s/ Sebastian Pastore
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ David J. MickelsonName:
    
    Sebastian Pastore
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    David J. MickelsonTitle:
    
    Vice PresidentBrewing Operations
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    President/COO
1 TheHonorable Stephen M. Reasoner, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-4043

___________ Cynthia A. O’Connell, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Minnesota. * Overson Inc., doing business * [UNPUBLISHED] as Kasson Lumber Co., * * Defendant - Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 18, 1999 Filed: July 2, 1999

___________ Before MURPHY and MAGILL, Circuit Judges, and REASONER, 1 District Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. Cynthia A. O’Connell was an employee of Overson Inc., a small lumber company with sixteen employees, for nine years. She was terminated for what Overson saidwas part of a restructuring for financial reasons, but she believed the discharge was because of her disability. O’Connell sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 § 107(a), 42 U.S.C. § 12117(a), the Civil Rights Act of 1991 § 102, 42 U.S.C. § 1981(a), and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn. Stat. § 363.03. The2 TheHonorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota. -2- district court 2 granted Overson’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that O’Connell had not produced sufficient evidence to show discriminatory intent or pretext. O’Connell appealed from the judgment. After a careful review of the record, we agree that Overson was entitled to summary judgment and therefore affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

CHRISTOPHER GRANTHAM , Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 5118

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:13

- cv

- 00981

- LB, Judge Lawrence J. Block.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________ O R D E R
Christopher Grantham moves for a default judgment based on the United States’ failure to file a timely info rmal brief. The United States moves out of time for a 29

- day extension of time, until November 20, 2014, to file its informal brief.
Upon considerat ion thereof, Case: 14-5118 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 11/20/2014GRANTHAM v. US 2

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion for an extension of time is granted. The United States’ informal brief is due no later than November 20, 2014.
(2) The motion for a default judgment is denied as
moot.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s25 Case: 14-5118 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 11/20/2014
#### BANDER v. BRESLAUER.

District Court, S. D. New York.

July 14, 1947.

See also, D.C., 7 F.R.D. 480.

KNOX, District Judge.

Under the provision of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 26(a), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, plaintiff does not need the specific authority of this court in order to conduct an examination of the defendant. All that need be done to serve plaintiff’s purpose is to comply with the requirements of Rule 30(a). By following the procedure there outlined, the convenience of the parties involved can better be served than by an order that fixes a date that will be more or less arbitrary, and which may be burdonsome to the litigants and their attorneys. I suggest, therefore, that counsel for the plaintiff confer with the attorneys for the defendant and that they agree upon a time and place for the examination of the defendant. Notice in’ conformity therewith can then be given.

Meanwhile, the court will direct defendant to produce at the time and place of such examination the books, papers and documents specified in Items 1, 2 and 3. The books specified in Item 4, to the extent that they are-relevant and material to plaintiff’s cause of action, shall likewise be produced. Upon the showing presently made, defendant need not produce the books and records called for in Item 5.