alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Jordan, an Infant. Family Focus Adoption Services, Inc., et al., Respondents; Maria B., Appellant.

Submitted September 14, 2009;

decided October 27, 2009

Reported below, 60 AD3d 764.

Motion by MFY Legal Services, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-31093 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MAURO ALEJANDRO HARO-TORRES, also known as Julian Montez, also known as Jose Rivera-Garcia, also known as Luis Rojo Lopez, also known as Mario Flores, also known as Julian Montez Villegas, also known as Luis Fojo Lopez, also known as Luis Rojo, also known as Mario Lopez-Gomez, also known as Julian Montes-Villegas, also known as Julian Montes Villehas, also known as Jullan Montez Villegas, also known as Mauro Alejandr Torez, also known as Mario Gomez-Lopez, also known as Fernando Medivil Zavala, also known as Juli Villegas, also known as Julian Motes-Villegas, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:06-CR-131-ALL

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mauro Alejandro Haro-Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Haro-Torres has not filed a response. OurNo. 06-31093 -2- independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Exhibit 24
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference  in the Registration  Statement  of
Form  S-8  (33-317553)  pertaining  to the Wyatt  Stock  Purchase Plan of Watson
Wyatt and  Company,  formerly  the Wyatt  Company,  of our report dated July 18,
1997,  with respect to the  financial  statements  of  Wellspring  Resources LLC
included  in Form 10-K of Watson  Wyatt and  Company for the year ended June 30,
1998.


/S/ Ernst & Young LLP
---------------------
Ernst & Young LLP

Jacksonville, Florida
September 24, 1998
Exhibit 31.1
 Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 Certification
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluations; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 10, 2009/s/ Stephen J. Hansbrough

Stephen J. Hansbrough
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-00986, 333-18189, 333-43215 and 333-70341 of Objective Systems Integrators,
Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated August 9, 1999, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Objective Systems Integrators, Inc. for the year ended
June 30, 1999.




/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
_____________________________
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Jose, California
September 27, 1999
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 08-1498 LATIN AMERICAN MUSIC COMPANY, d/b/a Asociación de Compositores y Editores de Música Latinoamericana (ACEMLA); ASOCIACIÓN DE COMPOSITORES Y EDITORES DE MÚSICA LATINOAMERICANA (ACEMLA), Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v . AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS,

Defendants, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on December 28, 2010, is amended as follows: On page 3, line 15, "§ 101," is deleted On page 4, lines 16-17, "Fed. R. App. P." is substituted for "First Circuit Local Rule"
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 205 (Monday, October 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 54978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25642]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Closed Meeting of the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) 
Executive Panel

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The CNO Executive Panel will report on the findings and 
recommendations of the Navy's Role in Irregular Warfare to the Chief of 
Naval Operations. The meeting will consist of discussions of current 
and future Navy strategy, plans, and policies in support of U.S. 
irregular challenges.

DATES: The closed Executive Session will be held on Monday, November 
16, 2009, from 3:10 p.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Boardroom at the CNA 
Building, 4825 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22311-1846.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander Brian S. 
FitzPatrick, CNO Executive Panel, 4825 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, 
VA 22311-1846, (703) 681-4924.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), matters that 
constitute classified information that have been properly classified 
pursuant to such Executive Order are specifically authorized to be kept 
secret in the interest of national defense. Accordingly, the Secretary 
of the Navy has determined in writing that the public interest requires 
that the sessions of this meeting be closed to the public because they 
will be concerned with classified matters that are governed by section 
552b(c)(1) of title 5, United States Code.
    Individuals or interested groups may submit written statements for 
consideration by the Chief of Naval Operations Executive Panel at any 
time or in response to the agenda of a scheduled meeting. All requests 
must be submitted to the Designated Federal Officer at the address 
detailed below.
    If the written statement is in response to the agenda mentioned in 
this meeting notice then the statement, if it is to be considered by 
the Panel for this meeting, must be received at least five days prior 
to the meeting in question.
    The Designated Federal Officer will review all timely submissions 
with the Chief of Naval Operations Executive Panel Chairperson, and 
ensure they are provided to members of the Chief of Naval Operations 
Executive Panel before the meeting that is the subject of this notice.
    To contact the Designated Federal Officer, write to Executive 
Director, CNO Executive Panel (N00K), 4825 Mark Center Drive, 2nd 
Floor, Alexandria, VA 22311-1846.

    Dated: October 20, 2009.
A. M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-25642 Filed 10-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
Exhibit 4.5


                              Amendment Number 1 to

                           CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd.
                     2006 Long Term Equity Compensation Plan

                                February 27, 2006

                               Amendment Number 1
             authorized by the Board of Directors, February 25, 2007
                    authorized by the Members, July 30, 2007


1.    Paragraph 4.1 (a) of the CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd. 2006 Long Term Equity
      Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), as initially adopted by the Board of
      Directors and Members on February 27, 2006, is amended, as authorized by
      the Board of Directors on February 25, 2007, and approved by the Members
      on July 30, 2007, to read as follows.

      4.1  Shares Available for Grants.

          (a)  Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.3 herein, the
               maximum number of Shares that may be delivered pursuant to Awards
               under the Plan shall be 2,735,021.

2.    The Plan is ratified and confirmed in all other respects.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Cause No. 01-11-00473-CV; Subodh Sonwalkar v. St. Luke’s Sugar Partnership, L.L.P.

On appeal from Trial Court Case No. 2011-24016, in the 152nd District Court of 

Harris County, Texas.

On August 31, 2012, St. Luke’s Sugar Land Partnership filed a motion for rehearing in 

this appeal. The Court requests a response to the motion. The response is due Tuesday, 

October 30, 2012. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale 

 Acting individually

Date: October 15, 2012
No. 830.

#### Seminole Nation *v.*United States.

February 16, 1942.

*Messrs. Paul M. Niebell, C. Maurice Weidemeyer,*and *W. W. Pryor*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Fahy*and *Assistant Attorney General Littell*for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims granted.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wolverine Tube, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the period ending June 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James E. Deason, Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer of Wolverine Tube, Inc., certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Wolverine Tube, Inc. and will be retained by Wolverine Tube, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

/s/  James E. Deason





James E. Deason
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of YoCream International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
W. Douglas Caudell Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ W. Douglas Caudell
W. Douglas Caudell
Chief Financial Officer
YoCream International, Inc.

September 14, 2004

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to YoCream International, Inc. and
will be retained by YoCream International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered October 20, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01463-CV

CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH AND CREDIT SUISSE 

SECURITIES (USA) LLC, Appellants

V.

CLAYMORE HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-07858-G

ORDER

We GRANT the parties’ October 18, 2016 joint motion for extension of time to file 

appellee’s brief and cross-appellees’ brief. We ORDER appellee’s brief and cross-appellees’

brief to be filed no later than November 28, 2016 and their reply briefs to be filed no later than 

January 18, 2017.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
#### ACCO BRANDS, INC. (doing business as Kensington Technology Group), Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ABA LOCKS MANUFACTURER CO., LTD., Defendant-Appellee, and Belkin Components, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2006-1570.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 26, 2006.

ORDER

The order of dismissal and the mandate dated 09/13/2006 having been issued in error, the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the notice of appeal is REINSTATED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 20, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-20031

Summary Calendar

 

BERNARD H. GLATZER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK; MARIAN B. GLATZER;

ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES;

MARLENE THOMASON,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-03-CV-4471

Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bernard H. Glatzer appeals from the dismissal of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging that the defendants conspired to

deprive him of his parental rights. Glatzer alleged that Thomason,

while acting as a temporary judge, conspired with his ex-wife and

issued without jurisdiction an order in California proceedings

affecting custody and child support. He further alleged that the

defendants improperly seized his assets in New York based on the
1 District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462

(1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923). 

2 Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971).

order. Glatzer sought damages and an injunction to stay separate

proceedings that he initiated in New York state court. The

district court dismissed the suit under the Rooker-Feldman1

doctrine as a collateral attack on the California order. In the

alternative, to the extent that state court proceedings were still

pending, the district court dismissed the suit based on the

Younger2 abstention doctrine.

Glatzer argues that the district court’s application of

the Rooker-Feldman doctrine was erroneous because the California

order was jurisdictionally void and his claims are based on the

defendants’ independent constitutional violations. We conclude

after reviewing the record and the briefs that Glatzer’s claims are

inextricably intertwined with the state court order and the

district court did not err. See United States v. Shepherd, 23 F.3d

923, 924 (5th Cir. 1994); Liedtke v. State Bar of Texas, 18 F.3d

315, 317 (5th Cir. 1994). Glatzer also argues that the district

court erroneously applied the Younger abstention doctrine. We

conclude, however, that the district court’s alternative ruling was

correct. See Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 481 U.S. 1, 14 (1987);

Wightman v. Texas Supreme Court, 84 F.3d 188, 189 (5th Cir. 1996).

Thomason's motion to file a sur-reply brief and Glatzer’s motion to

file a sur-sur-reply brief are DENIED.

AFFIRMED; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements No. 333-83676, 333-83682, 333-137129 and 333-139821 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 9, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of ManTech International Corporation (whichreport expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s adoption of FASB Statement 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*), and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ManTech International Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

March 9, 2007
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00195

- CV

In re Leslie Ray Turner

OR I GINAL PROCEEDING FROM SAN SABA COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the tri a l court ’s

failure to rule on his petition pending in the district court. On this record, having reviewed the

relator ’s petition for writ of mandamus, we deny the petition f or writ of mandamus. See Tex. R.

App. P. 52.8 (a)

.

_______________________________ ___________

Darlene Byrne

, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and S mith

Filed: April 30 , 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Restated Financial Data Schedule for the six months ended February 28, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                        $507,448
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,415,226
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,085,812
<INVENTORY>                                 19,551,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,661,753
<PP&E>                                     171,395,861
<DEPRECIATION>                              87,521,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             145,101,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,190,273
<BONDS>                                     47,237,409
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,458,947
<OTHER-SE>                                  60,526,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               145,101,093
<SALES>                                    102,417,245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           102,417,245
<CGS>                                       77,189,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               77,189,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               322,352
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,722,679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,475,723
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,710,363
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,765,360
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,765,360
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61<F1><F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60<F1><F2>
<FN>
<F1>Restated to conform to SFAS No. 128.
<F2>As adjusted to reflect the 50% share distribution declared on December 18,
1996 payable on January 13, 1997 to shareholders of record on December 27, 1996.
Prior Financial Data Schedules have not been restated for the distribution.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         3,398,314
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,241,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                   132,276
<INVENTORY>                                    3,199,421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,897,684
<PP&E>                                         3,610,185
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,948,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,276,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,369,546
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    25
<COMMON>                                       286,847
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,499,342
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   18,276,233
<SALES>                                        4,396,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,396,712
<CGS>                                          2,372,282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,372,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,326,742
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             222,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,486,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,486,583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,486,583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.23)
        


</TABLE>