alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF WOLVERINE TUBE, INC. FOR THE
THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED APRIL 4, 1998 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET OF WOLVERINE TUBE, INC. AT APRIL 4, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS FILED IN THE FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                          16,707
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,603<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     84,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,687
<PP&E>                                         157,159<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 442,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,809
<BONDS>                                        100,078
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,000
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                     244,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   244,148
<SALES>                                        170,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,299
<CGS>                                          145,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  145,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,529
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,954
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,575
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,575
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74
<FN>
<F1>The Values for the Tags Receivables and PP&E are shown net of their
respective allowance accounts. 
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 816.

#### C. H. Musselman Co. *v.*Alderson, State Tax Commissioner.

*780January 19, 1942.

*Messrs. Clarence E. Martin*and *Clarence E. Martin, Jr.,*for appellant. *Messrs.Clarence W. Meadows,*Attorney General of West Virginia, and *W. Holt Wooddell,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

The judgment is affirmed. *American Mfg. Co.*v. *St. Louis,*250 U. S. 459; *Aponaug Mfg. Co.*v. *Stone,*314 U. S. 577; *Department of Treasury*v. *Ingram-Richardson Mfg. Co.,*313 U. S. 252, 254; *Brown*v. *Houston,*114 U. S. 622; *McGoldrick*v. *Berwind-White Co.,*309 U. S. 33, 51-53.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

January 29, 2024

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2022-1766

B.H. AIRCRAFT COMPANY INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, GENERAL ELECTRIC 

COMPANY, DBA GE EDISON WORKS,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

Decided: January 2, 2024

Precedential Opinion

______________________

Please make the following change:

On page 5, replace “established by the Contract Disputes 

Act. 41 U.S.C. § 7107(b)(2)(A)” with “codified at 5 U.S.C. 

§ 706. 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(4)”

Case: 22-1766 Document: 73 Page: 1 Filed: 01/29/2024
#### HSBC Bank USA, as Trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006-AF2, Respondent, v Ungar Family Realty Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[974 NYS2d 583]

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Ungar Family Realty Corp. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an amended order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Alfieri, J.), entered January 17, 2012, as granted the plaintiffs motion, among other things, for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against it and to discontinue the action as against Jakab Ungar, and denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it or, in the alternative, to stay all proceedings in the action pending appointment of an administrator for the estate of Jakab Ungar.

Ordered that the amended order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

On this appeal, the defendant Ungar Family Realty Corp. (hereinafter UFRC) contends that the Supreme Court erred in granting the plaintiffs motion, among other things, for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against it and to discontinue the action as against Jakab Ungar, and denying its cross motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it or, in the alternative, to stay all proceedings in the action pending appointment of a personal representative for the estate of Ungar.

UFRC contends that Ungar, who was the signer of the subject note and mortgage, was a necessary party to the action and that the action was a nullity inasmuch as he died before the action was commenced. Normally, “[a] party may not commence a legal action or proceeding against a dead person, but must instead name the personal representative of the decedent’s estate” *(Jordan v City of New York,*23 AD3d 436, 437 [2005]). When a party’s death does not affect the merits of a case, however, “there is no need for strict adherence to the requirement that the proceedings be stayed pending substitution” *(Bova v Vinciguerra,*139 AD2d 797, 799 [1988]; *see DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc. v 44 Brushy Neck, Ltd.,*51 AD3d 857, 858 [2008]; *cf. Marte v Graber,*58 AD3d 1, 2 [2008]). Here, since Ungar had made an absolute conveyance of all his interest in the mortgaged premises to UFRC, including his equity of redemption, and af*674ter learning of his death, the plaintiff elected not to seek a deficiency judgment against him, Ungar was not a necessary party *(see Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn, v Connelly,*84 AD2d 805, 805 [1981]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly, inter alia, granted the plaintiff’s motion, among other things, for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against it and to discontinue the action as against Ungar, and denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it or, in the alternative, to stay all proceedings in the action pending appointment of an administrator for the estate of Ungar *(see DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc. v 44 Brushy Neck, Ltd.,*51 AD3d at 858-859; *Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v Connelly,*84 AD2d at 805; *cf. Marte v Graber,*58 AD3d at 2). Mastro, J.E, Skelos, Balkin and Roman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION

I, Peter Keefe, Chief Executive Officer , certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Earthworks
Entertainment, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this quarterly report fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


                 February 17, 2005        /s/ PETER KEEFE
                                          ---------------------
                                          Peter Keefe
                                          Chief Executive Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2509 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Mixtures of N-phenyl-N- 

((trichloromethyl)thio)-benzenesulfonamide, calcium carbonate, and mineral oil. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Mixtures 

of N-phenyl-N-((trichloromethyl)thio)-benzenesulfonamide, calcium carbonate, and mineral oil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF N-PHENYL-N-((TRICHLORO4 METHYL)THIO)-BENZENESULFONAMIDE, CAL5 CIUM CARBONATE, AND MINERAL OIL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.38.31 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 mixtures of N-phenyl-N-((trichloromethyl)thio)-benzene9 sulfonamide, calcium carbonate, and mineral oil) is 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2509 IS

1 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

2 2011’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

5 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

6 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.2


                     Consent of Certified Public Accountants



         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
         Statement (Form S-8 No.33-54990 and Form S-8 No.  33-73350)  pertaining
         to the 1992 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
         33-54986)  pertaining  to the 1992  Director  Stock  Option  Plan,  the
         Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-54988)  pertaining to the 1992
         Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (
         No. 33-22423)  pertaining to the 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the
         1992 Stock Option Plan, and the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan of our report
         dated July 31, 1997,  except for Note 12 as to which the date is August
         27,  1997,  with  respect  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements
         incorporated  by  reference  in this Annual  Report (Form 10-K) for the
         year ended June 30, 1997.



         /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP
         Ernst & Young LLP
         Tampa, Florida
         September 25, 1997
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Elena Strujan, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 705]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 12, 2012, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive emergency unemployment compensation benefits.

Claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits effective in September 2008, which were paid for the full period authorized by statute *(see*Labor Law §§ 521, 590 [4]). She thereafter received emergency unemployment compensation (hereinafter EUC) benefits, “which were paid to individuals who had ‘exhausted all rights to regular compensation under the [s]tate law or under [federal law with respect to a benefit year’ ” *(Matter of Umpierre [Commissioner of Labor],*80 AD3d 1123, 1123 [2011], quoting Pub L No 110-252, tit *IV,*§ 4001 [b] [1], 122 US Stat 2323). Claimant reapplied for unemployment insurance benefits when that benefit year ended in October 2009, and was found to have a valid original claim that entitled her to renewed regular benefits at a significantly lower rate. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board determined that *1240claimant was not entitled to ongoing EUC benefits due to her renewed eligibility for regular benefits, and she now appeals.

We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that claimant had earned sufficient income to permit her to make a valid original claim when she reapplied for unemployment insurance benefits in October 2009 *(see*Labor Law §§ 516, 527 [1]). Claimant had accordingly not exhausted her right to receive regular benefits during that period and, as a result, the Board properly refused to award her ongoing EUC benefits *(see Matter of Umpierre [Commissioner of Labor],*80 AD3d at 1123-1124).

Stein, J.E, McCarthy, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Description of Certain Compensatory Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.27 
 DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS 
 BETWEEN REGISTRANT AND EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS 
 Varian, Inc. (“the Company”) leases or purchases an automobile for the each of its executive officers, subject
to certain lease or purchase “cap” limitations that vary by executive officer. The Company reimburses the executive officer for all fuel, maintenance and repairs costs for the leased automobile, pays all registration fees, taxes and other
costs relating to the automobile, and insures the automobile under its insurance programs. The Company also reimburses the executive officer (by way of a “gross-up” payment) for taxes on income that is imputed to the executive officer for
the personal use of the automobile.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1004

MICHAEL MCCLOUD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CRISTELLA RICE; NEWPORT NEWS REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING 

AUTHORITY,

 Defendants - Appellees,

and

MARCIA L. FUDGE, Secretary of HUD; KELLY BRUNSON; STUART 

GARDENS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (4:20-cv-00004-MSD-RJK)

Submitted: September 28, 2023 Decided: October 4, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1004 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/04/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Michael McCloud, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew D. Meadows, JONES, BLECHMAN, 

WOLTZ & KELLY, PC, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1004 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/04/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Michael McCloud appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to 

Defendants in McCloud’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Specifically, we conclude that McCloud failed to demonstrate that 

Defendants violated his due process rights as a matter of law because he had no 

constitutionally protected property or liberty interest in his application for a Section 8 

housing voucher. See, e.g., Phelps v. Hous. Auth. of Woodruff, 742 F.2d 816, 822-23 (4th 

Cir. 1984). Defendants were therefore entitled to summary judgment on McCloud’s 

claims. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1004 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/04/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101 (Thursday, May 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11900]



[[Page 25487]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Modoc County Resource Advisory Committee, Alturas, CA, 96101, 
USDA Forest Service.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committees 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 110-343) the Modoc National 
Forest's Modoc County Resource Advisory Committee will meet June 1, 
2009, August 3, 2009, and September 14, 2009, in Alturas, California 
96101, for a business meeting. The meetings are open to the public.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The business meetings on June 1, August 3, 
and September 14, 2009, will begin at 6 p.m., at the Modoc National 
Forest Office, Conference Room, 800 West 12th St., Alturas, California 
96101. Agenda topics include (1) presentations on active RAC projects, 
(2) financial updates, and (3) reviewing and voting on project 
proposals that meet the intent of Public Law 110-343. Time will also be 
set aside for public comments at the beginning of the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stan Sylva, Forest Supervisor and 
Designated Federal Officer, at (530) 233-8700; or Rural Development and 
Partnership Specialist Dina McElwain at (530) 233-8723.

Jim C. Gumm,
Public Affairs Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-11900 Filed 5-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 29, 2020

b0921

Order 

Clerk

September 29, 2020

159455

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 159455

COA: 347273

Wayne CC: 02-011393-FC

TYRONE MAURICE SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2019 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHNNY BAKER,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v.

S. LAKE; et al.,

Respondents

- Appellees. No. 19

- 16132

D.C. No. 1:18

- cv

- 01642

- SKO

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Sheila K. Oberto, Magistrate Judge, Presiding **

Submitted February 4, 2020 * * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Johnny Baker appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 22 41 petition for a writ of habeas corpus , and its

order denying his motion for reconsideration . We have jurisdiction under 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge

.

** * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 16132

U.S.C. § 1291

. We review de novo the denial of a sec tion 2241 petition, s ee Lane

v. Swain , 910 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir. 2018), cert. denied , 140 S. Ct. 60 (2019 )

,

and for abuse of discretion the denial of a reconsideration motion, see Sch. Dist.

No. 1J, Multnomah Cty

. , O r. v. ACandS, Inc. , 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993).

We affirm.

Baker challenges a prison disciplinary proceeding in which he was

sanctioned with the disallowance of good conduct time. He contends that the

disciplinary hearing officer (“DHO”) was not impartial and that there was

insufficient evidence to support the DHO ’ s f indings. Baker does not present any

evidence of partiality, but rather contends that an impartial decision maker would

have found he was not guilty of possessing narcotics. However, the evidence

considered by the DHO, including the drug test results, sup ported the DHO’s

finding. See Liteky v. United States , 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994) (unfavorable or

adverse rulings alone are insufficient to show bias “ unless they display a deep

seated favoritism or antagonism that would make fair judgment impossible” );

Sup erintendent v. Hill , 472 U.S. 445, 455 (1985) ( due process is satisfied if “some

evidence” supports disciplinary decision)

.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 13 (Thursday, January 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1189]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-922-09-1310-FI; COC66236]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease COC66236 from Red 
Willow Production, LLC., for lands in Jackson County, Colorado. The 
petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due 
since the date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Milada 
Krasilinec, Land Law Examiner, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, 
at 303-239-3767.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate lease COC66236 effective September 1, 2008, under the 
original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and 
royalty rates cited above.

    Dated: January 14, 2009.
Milada Krasilinec,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. E9-1189 Filed 1-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P