alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2707 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 97. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself and Mr. REED) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 97. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 97. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Butanamide, N-(4-chloro-2,5- 

dimethoxyphenyl)-2-[2-[2,5- 

dimethoxy-4- 

[(phenylamino)sulfonyl]phenyl]diazenyl]-3- 

oxo (CAS No. 12225–18–2) 

(provided for in subheading 

3204.17.04) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2707 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2718 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ion exchange resins 

(cationic H form). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain ion 

exchange resins (cationic H form). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ION EXCHANGE RESINS (CATIONIC H 

4 FORM). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.71 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain ion exchange resins (cationic H form)) is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2718 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

LAUREL CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-K
EXHIBIT 11
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      FOR THE         FOR THE         FOR THE
                                                     YEAR ENDED      YEAR ENDED      YEAR ENDED
                                                   June 30, 2004   June 30, 2003   June 30, 2002
                                                   -------------   -------------   -------------
<S>                                                <C>             <C>             <C>
NET INCOME                                         $   1,687,000   $   2,534,000   $   3,075,000
                                                   =============   =============   =============
BASIC EPS:

     WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING               1,897,091       1,880,815       1,937,545
                                                   -------------   -------------   -------------
     BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE                      $        0.89   $        1.35   $        1.59
                                                   =============   =============   =============
DILUTED EPS:

     WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING               1,897,091       1,880,815       1,937,545
     DILUTIVE EFFECT OF EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTIONS            88,025         101,119         100,062
                                                   -------------   -------------   -------------
     DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING       1,985,116       1,981,934       2,037,607
                                                   -------------   -------------   -------------
     DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                    $        0.85   $        1.28   $        1.51
                                                   =============   =============   =============
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Sport-Haley, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do each certify, to our respective knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated:
September 26, 2002

|/s/KEVIN M. TOMLINSONKevin M. Tomlinson
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/PATRICK W. HURLEYPatrick W. Hurley
Chief Financial Officer   |  | 

---

QuickLinks
#### Juan Jose AVELAR; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-71845.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 17, 2006.

Juan Jose Avelar, Lawndale, CA, pro se.

Veronica Guzman, Lawndale, CA pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Angela N. Liang, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

Al other pending motions are denied as moot.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### JOSEPH T. WALSH, Petitioner v. TOWN OF WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH BOARD OF ALDERMAN ACTING AS A BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; CHARLES W. SMITH, III and wife, CONSTANCE C. SMITH, Respondents

No. 467A06

(Filed 4 May 2007)

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 179 N.C. App. 97, 632 S.E.2d 271 (2006), dismissing petitioner’s appeal from an order entered on 29 August 2005 by Judge Benjamin G. Alford in Superior Court, New Hanover County. Heard in the Supreme Court 9 January 2007.

*Carolina Legal Counsel, by J. Wesley Casteen, for petitioner-appellant.*

*Wessell & Rainey, by John C. Wessell, III, for respondentappellee Town of Wrightsville Beach Board of Aldermen; and Murchison, Taylor & Gibson, PLLC, by Michael Murchison, for respondent-appellees Charles W. and Constance C. Smith.*

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and remanded to that court for reconsideration in light of our decision in *State v. Hart,*361 N.C. 309,-S.E.2d-(2007).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12877]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Clinical Center; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors of the NIH Clinical Center. The meeting 
will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended 
for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural 
programs and projects conducted by the Clinical Center, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors of the NIH 
Clinical Center.
    Date: June 18, 2009.
    Time: 8:15 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Clinical Center's Nursing 
Department.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 10, 10 Center 
Drive, Room 4-2551, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: David K Henderson, MD, Deputy Director for 
Clinical Care, Office of the Director, Clinical Center, National 
Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 6-1480, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-3515.

    Dated: May 26, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-12877 Filed 6-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### In the Matter of Gerald S. Sabini, Appellant, v Jane R. Sabini, Respondent.

[961 NYS2d 792]

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Woods, J.), entered August 10, 2012, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Braxton, S.M.), entered June 21, 2012, denying his petition for downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order entered August 10, 2012, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the father’s objections to the denial of his petition for downward modification of his child support obligation. The father failed to offer proof of a substantial and unanticipated change in his financial circumstances since the time he agreed to the support amount *(see*Family Ct Act § 451 [2] [a]; *Schlakman v Schlakman,*38 AD3d 640 [2007]). Furthermore, contrary to the father’s contentions, he failed to show that he used his best efforts to secure employment commensurate with his qualifications and experience *(see*Family Ct Act § 451 [2] [b] [ii]; *Matter of Marrale v Marrale,*44 AD3d 773, 776 [2007]; *Beard v Beard,*300 AD2d 268 [2002]).

Dillon, J.E, Austin, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2643 

To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on polyethylene HE1878. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. SESSIONS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on polyethylene 

HE1878. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLYETHYLENE HE1878. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.34 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 polyethylene HE1878) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2643 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 24
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference  in the Registration  Statement  of
Form  S-8  (33-317553)  pertaining  to the Wyatt  Stock  Purchase Plan of Watson
Wyatt and  Company,  formerly  the Wyatt  Company,  of our report dated July 18,
1997,  with respect to the  financial  statements  of  Wellspring  Resources LLC
included  in Form 10-K of Watson  Wyatt and  Company for the year ended June 30,
1997.


/S/ Ernst & Young LLP
---------------------
Ernst & Young LLP

Jacksonville, Florida
September 24, 1997
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Randall Greenough, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00023

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 402nd District Court of Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 23,425

- 2017 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Randall Greenough, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 13, 2018 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.3

             CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to the best of such officer's knowledge, that:

          (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for
     the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with
     the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Dated: May 10, 2006                      /s/ Sandra B. Cochran
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Sandra B. Cochran
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7351
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RANDY JONES, a/k/a Freeze, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-93-14-BR, CA-95-152-5-CV-BR) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 18, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Eric Evenson, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones , Nos. CR-93-14-BR; CA-95-152-5-CV-BR (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of HearUSA, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 27, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we,
Stephen J. Hansbrough, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and, Gino
Chouinard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of our
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                               
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. of the Company.



| | /s/ Stephen J. Hansbrough

Stephen J. Hansbrough
Chief Executive Officer
HearUSA, Inc.
November 12, 2003
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ Gino Chouinard

Gino Chouinard
Chief Financial Officer
HearUSA, Inc.
November 12, 2003
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
L. Weinberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                                  /s/ David L. Weinberg
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  David L. Weinberg
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  May 14, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carashane B., Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 54]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered April 24, 2012, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3V2 years, with three years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously reversed, on the law, the plea vacated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings on the indictment.

At the time of defendant’s plea, the court promised defendant a sentence of youthful offender treatment and probation if he completed the CASES program, had no new arrests and met certain other conditions. However, if defendant did not complete the program or violated any of the conditions, the court apprised him he would be “facing any lawful sentence which could be jail or prison.” When defendant violated the conditions and was rearrested, the court declined to adjudicate him a youthful offender and sentenced him to 3V2 years in state prison, plus three years postrelease supervision.

In *People v McAlpin*(17 NY3d 936 [2011]), the Court of Appeals vacated the plea and sentence where the court advised the *551defendant that the consequences of violating a youthful offender agreement would be a prison sentence of at least 3V2 years, with a potential maximum sentence of 15 years, but did not mention that postrelease supervision would be imposed. The Court concluded that the mention of a specific prison term without also noting the possibility of postrelease supervision conveyed an inaccurate impression concerning the sentencing options. Similarly, by noting that the sentence could include jail or prison, without also mentioning postrelease supervision, the court here gave defendant an incomplete picture of the sentence he faced if he failed the conditions.

The People’s argument that this case can be distinguished from *McAlpin*because the court told defendant he could be facing “any lawful sentence” is not persuasive. The court’s reference to “jail or prison,” which followed the phrase “any lawful sentence,” may have conveyed an inaccurate impression that defendant’s sentence would only include a jail or prison term. Thus, defendant’s plea was not knowingly made and must be vacated *(see People v Rivera,*91 AD3d 498 [1st Dept 2012]). Because we are vacating the plea, we need not address defendant’s claim that the court should have adjudicated him a youthful offender. Concur — Acosta, J.P, Saxe, Renwick, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.
#### Ex parte WRIGHT.

No. 23744.

United States District Court N. D. California.

Oct. 27, 1948.

•Before William Denman, U. S. Circuit Judge for tlie Ninth Circuit.

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

’ United States Attorney Karesh, attorney for the respondent Warden, advises me that the Warden cannot be required to deliver the petitioner to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Illinois as, by oversight, was required of him by my final order dated April 23, 1948, heretofore made herein, granting petitioner’s petition for release from the custody of the Warden. Wright v. Johnston, D.C., 77 F.Supp. 687.

In the- absence of a specific statutory requirement for such a return, it was a wrong to petitioner for me so to suggest that petitioner’s return will be required by the court whose error, then duly protested by petitioner, has prevented for over 17 years a trial which should be “speedy,” that is for over’ 5 times the statutory limitation for indictment for the offense, with the likely loss of witnesses and inevitable impairment of memory of those procurable.

This oversight may be corrected by me at any time where the case is not on appeal. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 60(a), 28 U.S.C.A. Since an appeal taken from the order has been dismissed, the order of April 23, 1948, is ordered amended nunc pro tunc to read:

On this 23rd day of April, it is ordered that Wright’s petition that he be discharged from the custody of the Warden' is granted. This order is ordered stayed for ten days.
ROY MIDDLETON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3122

__________ ___________________/

Opinion filed October 15, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. T. Michael Jones , Judge

. Roy Middleton , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a timely rule 3.801 motion asserting that he is entitled to

jail credit for the time he was held in the Escambia County Jail awaiting his second

trial until the date of sentencing

, June 29, 2012. See § 921.161(1)

- (2) , Fla. Stat. ;2 Kitchen v. State , 20 So. 3d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). The state concede s that

appellant is entitled to this jail credit. We therefore reverse and remand for the

trial court to determine and award the amo unt of jail credit to be awarded for this

time period

. See Kitchen at 977 (citing Hidalgo v. State

, 729 So. 2d 984 , 986

- 87

(Fla. 3d DCA 1999)).

REVERSED AND REMANDED

.
ROBERTS, C.J., MARSTILLER and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.