alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12755]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax 
Assistance Issue Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer 
Income Tax Issue Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, July 14, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Volunteer Income Tax 
Issue Committee will be held Tuesday, July 14, 2009, at 2 p.m. Eastern 
time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Marisa Knispel. For more information please contact Ms. Knispel at 
1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech 
Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web 
site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: May 27, 2009.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-12755 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
6H 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0610

MARK DEMING,

Plaintiff and Appellant

 v.

JASON DEMING and KELLY DEMING, 

Defendants and Appellee.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Elizabeth Mary Varela, whose name appears next on 

the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals 

which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this December 30, 2021.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Kevin J. Chapman, Penelope S. Strong, Elizabeth Mary Varela

12/30/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0610
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6644** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SPENCER BOWENS, a/k/a Scooter, a/k/a Clyde, a/k/a Melvin McCurdy, a/k/a Doc Johnson , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:98

- cr - 00110

- REP

- 1 )

Submitted : August 27 , 2015 Decided: September 1, 2015

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Spencer Bowens, Appellant Pro Se. Dominick Salvatore Gerace, II , Norval George Metcalf , Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Spencer Bowens appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bowens , No. 3 : 98

- cr 00 110

- REP

- 1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materi als before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; ARRA CNTRICS-Competitive Supplement.
    Date: June 16, 2009.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Allan F. Mirsky, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rm. 
6157, MSC 9609, Bethesda, MD 20892-9609, 301-496-2551, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e382858e8a9190889aa38e828a8fcd8d8a8bcd848c95"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adcccbc0c4dfdec6d4edc0ccc4c183c3c4c583cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research and 
Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 21, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-12579 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 26 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas on September 11, 2001, acts of war involving the 

hijacking of commercial airplanes were committed against 

the United States, killing and injuring thousands of innocent people; 

Whereas 1 of the hijacked planes, United Airlines Flight 93, 

crashed in a field in Pennsylvania; 

Whereas while Flight 93 was still in the air, the passengers 

and crew, through cellular phone conversations with loved 

ones on the ground, learned that other hijacked airplanes 

had been used to attack the United States; 

Whereas during those phone conversations, several of the passengers indicated that there was an agreement among the 

passengers and crew to try to overpower the hijackers 

who had taken over Flight 93; 

Whereas Congress established the National Commission on 

Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (commonly referred to as ‘‘the 9–11 Commission’’) to study the September 11, 2001, attacks and how they occurred; 
2 

SCON 26 RFH 

Whereas the 9–11 Commission concluded that ‘‘the nation 

owes a debt to the passengers of Flight 93. Their actions 

saved the lives of countless others, and may have saved 

either the U.S. Capitol or the White House from destruction.’’; and 

Whereas the crash of Flight 93 resulted in the death of everyone on board: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That 

3 (1) the United States owes the passengers and 

4 crew of United Airlines Flight 93 deep respect and 

5 gratitude for their decisive actions and efforts of 

6 bravery; 

7 (2) the United States extends its condolences to 

8 the families and friends of the passengers and crew 

9 of Flight 93; 

10 (3) not later than October 1, 2006, the Speaker 

11 of the House of Representatives, the minority leader 

12 of the House of Representatives, the majority leader 

13 of the Senate, the minority leader of the Senate, the 

14 Chairman and the Ranking Member of the Com15 mittee on Rules and Administration of the Senate, 

16 and the Chairman and the Ranking Member of the 

17 Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of 

18 the House of Representatives shall select an appro19 priate memorial that shall be located in the United 

20 States Capitol and that shall honor the passengers 
3 

SCON 26 RFH 

1 and crew of Flight 93, who saved the United States 

2 Capitol from destruction; and 

3 (4) the memorial shall state the purpose of the 

4 honor and the names of the passengers and crew of 

5 Flight 93 on whom the honor is bestowed. 

Passed the Senate July 18, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
#### Charles L. Crisman vs. Isaac B. Swisher.

1. The return to a writ of attachment by a constable, that he served the writ of attachment according to the statute in such case made and provided, is insufficient. He should return the way in which he executes the writ, so that the court can judge whether it is according to law.

2. It should appear affirmatively in the proceedings under an attachment, issued by a justice of the peace, that on the return of the attachment tho justice fixed a day for the hearing of the cause.

3. In an action brought befoi-e a justice of the peace by the holder *oí*a promissory note payable to order, the state of demand must show that the note has been legally transí erred to the plaintiff.

On *certiorari*in a suit by attachment against a nonresident debtor.

Ogdeh, J.

The whole proceedings in this case are irregular and grossly defective from the time the process of attachment was delivered to the constable. Instead of endorsing upon the attachment the manner in which he executed it, he cuts off all examination of that matter by a return, that he “ served the writ of attachment according to the statute in such ease made and provided.” He should have returned the way in which he executed the writ, so that the court could judge whether it ivas authorized to proceed further with the suit.

Again, it does not appear affirmatively that on the re*150turn of the writ the justice appointed a day for the hearing of the cause. The transcript states that, on the 26th of December, 1857, the day appointed for the hearing, he proceeded, &c. Although such inference might be> a stretch of intendment, yet, if this was the only difficulty in the case, we might assume that the day for hearing was fixed on the return day, as no other time appears.

But upon the state of demand and the promissory note, which was in evidence, it is manifest that the plaintiff showed no cause of action. The note is dated July 26th, 1858, payable, thirty days after date, to the order' of John McNeal, given by Charles L. Crisman and Jacob Crisman, jointly, for the payment of thirty-six dollars and twenty-eight cents. There is. no endorsement upon the note, nor any allegation in the state of demand that the same had been in any way transferred by the payee to the plaintiff.

Upon this return, state of demand and evidence, the justice rendered judgment for seventy-eight dollars and nine cents debt, and two dollars and ninety cents costs.

The judgment was illegal, and is reversed.
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF FULL HOUSE RESORTS, INC.**

 
| **NAME OF  SUBSIDIARY**                |   | **JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION** |
|----------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                                   |   |                              |
| Deadwood Gulch Resort and Gaming Corp. |   | South Dakota                      |
|                                   |   |                              |
| Full House Mississippi, LLC            |   | Mississippi                       |
|                                   |   |                              |
| Full House Subsidiary, Inc.            |   | Delaware                          |
|                                   |   |                              |
| Full House Subsidiary of Nevada, Inc.  |   | Nevada                            |
|                                   |   |                              |
| Gaming Entertainment, LLC              |   | Delaware                          |
|                                   |   |                              |
| Gaming Entertainment (Delaware), LLC*  |   | Delaware                          |
|                                   |   |                              |
| Gaming Entertainment (Michigan), LLC   |   | Delaware                          |
|                                   |   |                              |
| Gaming Entertainment (California), LLC |   | Delaware                          |
|                                   |   |                              |
| Greenhouse Management, Inc.**          |   | Michigan                          |

 

----

*50% owned

**85% owned

 

----
Exhibit 10.3
  
 Re:
    
    Separation Agreement
  Agreement Company
 1. Separation. Separation Date .
 2. Consultancy.
 a. Consulting Period.
 b. Consulting Services. Consulting
Services
 c. Consulting Fees.
 d. Protection of Confidential and Proprietary Information.




---



##### 



e. Authority and Facilities Usage During Consulting Period.
 3. Severance.
 4. Accrued Salary and Vacation.
 5. Health Insurance.
 6. Stock Options Options
 2




---



##### 



7. Other Compensation or Benefits.
 8. Expense Reimbursement.
 9. Return of Company Property. Company Property
 10. Proprietary Information Obligations. Inventions  Proprietary Information 
 a.
 b.
 c.
 3




---



##### 



d.
 e.
 f.
 g. PIIA
 11. Nondisparagement.
 12. Release.
 4




---



##### 



ADEA
 13. ADEA Waiver. Effective Date
 14. Section 1542 Waiver. A general release does not extend
to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of
executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her
settlement with the debtor.
 15. Arbitration. JAMS
 5




---



##### 



16. Miscellaneous.
  6




---



##### 



By:
    
    /s/ Timothy P. WalbertTimothy P. Walbert,President and Chief Executive Officer
 Agreed and Accepted:/s/ Bonnie J. Mills
    
    June 9, 2008Bonnie J. Mills
    
    Date
 cc:
    
    Robert De VaereJeff ShermanJackie Fritz
 7
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

      ( print page 26484)    

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, July 15, 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marianne Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, July 15, 2009, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Marianne Ayala. For more information please contact Mrs. Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: May 27, 2009. 

Shawn F. Collins, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. E9-12683 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

PR 20-0005

IN RE PETITION OF JOHN C. BOYD FOR

CONDITIONAL ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF

THE STATE OF MONTANA.

ALED

JUN 3 0 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State nf Montana

ORDER

John C. Boyd has petitioned for conditional admission to the practice of law in

Montana. Boyd is applying for employment with the Missoula Office of the Montana

Public Defender, and seeks conditional or temPorary admission to practice until he can

complete the process of admission by motion. He will complete the process upon taking

the Montana Law Seminar, but "believes conditional early admission would strengthen his

candidacy for that position or any other attorney positions that may become available

before the Montana Law Seminar scheduled to be held on July 30, 2020." We previously

waived the requirement that Boyd sit for the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam.

We have routinely denied such petitions for temporary admission. See Petition of

Gosch, 07-0303, issued March 7, 2016. We have explained that the Court has made

substantial revisions to the rules of admission over the past several years to open and

streamline the process of entering the practice of law in Montana by admission on inotion

or by transfer of a UBE score. Those rules are now in effect and applicants are being

processed routinely. The Court's intention was that the implementation of these rule

revisions would eliminate the necessity for consideration of many of the ad hoc petitions

for temporary admission or for waiver of admission requirements that were received in the

past.

Granting temporary admission as a matter of course to lawyers intending to seek

admission on motion or admission by UBE score transfer would burden the Court and

Clerk of Court with duplicative consideration and processing of each applicant. Further,

no system exists to formally monitor those who are admitted temporarily to ensure they are

06/30/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0005
advancing their intention to be admitted on motion or have remained in the employment

for which they sought admission. Because rules now exist for the expeditious admission

of qualified candidates to the practice of law in Montana, we decline to pursue a practice

of granting temporary admission to applicants who intend to seek admission thereunder.

As we stated in Petition of Gosch, "Temporary admission until sitting for the bar exam

may be appropriate in circumstances where a candidate does not qualify for admission on

motion or for transfer of a UBE score." Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for conditional admission to the

practice of law is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State

Bar of Montana.

DATED this it day of June, 2020.

Chief Justice

Justices
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,746,928
<SECURITIES>                                   275,833
<RECEIVABLES>                                  626,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                    35,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,153,665
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,959,183
<PP&E>                                         788,963
<DEPRECIATION>                                 468,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,279,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          940,127
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,152
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,279,590
<SALES>                                      6,949,652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,949,652
<CGS>                                        4,024,841
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,322,598
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                753,424
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   753,424
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18



</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2681 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl chloroacetate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Methyl chloroacetate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METHYL CHLOROACETATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Methyl chloroacetate (CAS 

No. 96–34–4) (provided for 

in subheading 2915.40.50) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2681 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS