alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,

v. DEMI ROSE KVETON, Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 36350

- 3

- III

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

P ENNELL , A.C. J.

— Demi Kveton appeals various legal finan cial obligations imposed in conjunction with her 2016 judgment and sentence for delivery of methamphetamine. We dismiss M s. Kveton’s appeal as untimely. FACTS Ms. Kveton pl eaded guilty to one count of delivery of methamphetamine. After finding Ms. Kveton s uffered a chemical dependency, the trial court imposed a prison

based drug offender sentencing alternative (DOSA) and several legal financial obligations (LFOs). The LFOs included a $200 criminal filing fee, a $100 DNA 1 collection fee, and statutory intere st. The judgment and sentence was entered on October 14, 2016.

1 Deoxyribonucleic acid. 

### FILED DECEMBER 12, 2019 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division IIINo. 36350

- 3

- III State v. Kveton

2 Ms. Kveton violated the terms of her DOSA. She was arrested and on August 29, 2018, her community corrections officer filed a notice of violation in the trial court ,

rec ommend ing revocation of the DOSA . The court considered the violation report and on August 30, 2018 , entered an order revoking Ms. Kveton’s DOSA. The order imposed 44 months’ confinement and stated “[a]ll other terms and conditions of the original Judgment and Sentence shall remai n in effect.” Clerk’s Papers at 148.
Ms. Kveton filed a notice of appeal on September 28, 2018

. ANALYSIS Ms. Kveton argues on appeal that b ecause she is indigent, RCW 36.18.020(2)(h) and RCW 43.43.7541 prohibit imposition of the $200 criminal filing f ee an d $100 DNA
collection fee. We do not reach the issue because Ms. Kveton’s appeal is untimely. Ms. Kveton’s LFOs were imposed on October 14, 2016. They were not re

- imposed during the August 30, 2018 revocation hearing. Instead, they merely remained in effec t. The August 2018 revocation hearing was not a resentencing. See State v. Canfield , 154 Wn.2d 698, 705, 116 P.3d 391 (2005). It did not result in the issuance of a new judgment and sentence. Because Ms. Kveton’s LFOs were not imposed or re

- imposed at her DOSA revocation hearing, the LFOs are no t before the court as part of Ms. Kveton’s notice ofNo. 36350-3-III State v. Kveton
appeal. Ms. Kveton had 30 days from her October 14, 2016, sentencing to appeal her
LFOs. RAP 5.2(a)(l). Since she did not do so, her appeal is untimely and must be
dismissed. 2
CONCLUSION
Ms. Kveton's appeal is dismissed as untimely.
A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in
the Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to
RCW 2.06.040. 

# Q_ .SL,~ Pennell, A.C.J. WE CONCUR:

# ~~- Korsmo, J.

2 Ms. Kveton also argues RCW 10.82.090(1) bars the State from assessing interest on nonrestitution LFOs as of June 7, 2018. Nothing about the revocation order currently under appeal suggests the State is in violation of this provision.
3
#### N.C. State Bar v. Leonard

Case below: 178 N.C. App. 432

No. 449P06

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-1411)

Denied 01/25/07
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUL 24 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

RUSSEL LEE SINGLETARY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VERN LUKEHART, Deputy Marshal,

U.S. Marshal Service, Des Moines, Iowa;

BILL GRAS, Warden CCA, Lansing

Kansas; CARROL ST. CLAIR, RN, CCA

Lansing, Kansas, individually and in her

official capacity; DR. BOWLIN, contract

physician of CCA, Lansing, Kansas.

Defendants - Appellees..

No. 98-3137

(D.C. No. 97-CV-3102-GTV)

(KANSAS)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

Russel Lee Singletary appeals the dismissal of his pro se civil rights action seeking

redress under the Eighth Amendment. In the district court he asserted he was subjected to

cruel and unusual punishment because of medical treatment for an injury he received
- 2 -

while confined. After examining the briefs and the record, we have determined

unanimously that oral argument will not materially assist the determination of this appeal. 

The case is therefore submitted on the briefs. See Fed. R. App. P. (34)(a); 10th Cir. R.

34.1.9. 

Although the district court dismissed Mr. Singletary’s complaint because he failed

to show he had been treated with deliberate indifference, the court nonetheless granted

him leave to appeal without prepayment of fees, assessing partial payment over time. We

remind Mr. Singletary that regardless of the outcome of the appeal, he is obliged to pay

the entire fee in compliance with the order of the district court.

Our review leads us to the conclusion the district court did not err. Given the most

liberal construction of the allegations made by Mr. Singletary, his claims would rise only

to the level of simple negligence. Those claims, therefore, cannot constitute a valid

Eighth Amendment complaint. For the reasons given in its order of dismissal, the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 11.1

                           ATHENA MEDICAL CORPORATION 
                      CALCULATIONS OF NET INCOME PER SHARE


                                                  For the three months ended
                                                           March 31
                                                ------------------------------
                                                    1997            1996      
                                                --------------  --------------
Actual weighted average shares outstanding
for the period                                    10,453,502       8,948,243  
Dilutive common stock options and warrants                            
using the treasury stock method(1)                     -               -      

                                                --------------  --------------

Total shares used in per share calculations       10,453,502       8,948,243  
                                                --------------  --------------

Net loss                                           $635,399       $1,013,051  
                                                --------------  --------------

Net loss per share                                  $0.06           $0.11
                                                --------------  --------------
                                                --------------  --------------

(1) Options and warrants outstanding are not included as the effect would
    be anti-dilutive.


                                       Page 13
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the December
31,  1999  Form  10-K  and  is  qualified  in  its entirety by reference to such
financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       10234
<SECURITIES>                               4299032
<RECEIVABLES>                                63132
<ALLOWANCES>                                  4138
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              7705
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             4375965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      4065078
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                  65805
<COMMON>                                       220
<OTHER-SE>                                  244862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               4375965
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            260412
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              5611
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              2867
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          226350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              25584
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          25584
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 25584
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .88


</TABLE>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
    <meta name="robots" content="noindex">
    <title>Research Programs & Contacts - NIDDK</title>
    
<meta name="VIcurrentDateTime" content="638490748708636877" />
<meta name="VirtualFolder" content="/" />
<script type="text/javascript" src="/layouts/system/VisitorIdentification.js"></script>

</head>
<body>
    <div></div>
</body>
</html>
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




TERMINATION AGREEMENT




This Termination Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between Endeavour
International Corporation (the “Company”), a Nevada corporation, and Mr. John N. Seitz (“Mr.
Seitz”).



WHEREAS, the Company and Mr. Seitz entered into a Consulting Agreement (“Consulting
Agreement”) as of October 9, 2006; and



WHEREAS, the Company and Mr. Seitz desire to terminate the Consulting Agreement on the terms
and conditions set forth in this Agreement;



NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:



1. Termination of Agreement. The Consulting Agreement will terminate as of November
30, 2007. The compensation provided for in the Consulting Agreement will be payable through
November 30, 2007 and not thereafter.



2. Effect of Agreement. The parties agree that nothing in this Agreement or the
termination of the Consulting Agreement will result in an acceleration of the vesting of Mr.
Seitz’s existing stock options or restricted stock outstanding under existing stock option
agreements and restricted stock agreements. The existing stock options and restricted stock shall
continue to vest upon the schedules provided for under such agreements through January 2, 2008 but
not thereafter; all stock options and restricted stock existing under such agreements not vesting
by January 2, 2008 shall be cancelled.



3. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Texas.



4. Arbitration. Either party may elect that any dispute or controversy arising under
or in connection with this Agreement be settled by arbitration in Houston, Texas in accordance with
the rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect. If the parties cannot mutually
agree on an arbitrator, then the arbitration shall be conducted by a three arbitrator panel, with
each party selecting one arbitrator and the two arbitrators so selected selecting a third
arbitrator. The findings of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding, and judgment may be
entered thereon in any court having jurisdiction. The findings of the arbitrator(s) shall not be
subject to appeal to any court, except as otherwise provided by applicable law. The arbitrator(s)
may, in his or her (or their) own discretion, award legal fees and costs to the prevailing party.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Termination Agreement as of November
29, 2007.



ENDEAVOUR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION



By:



/s/ H. Don Teague

H. Don Teague

Executive Vice President




/s/ John N. Seitz


John N. Seitz
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1839-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-1839-DR), dated May 15, 2009, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         May 21, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Tennessee is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 15, 2009.

Humphreys County for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E9-12854 Filed 6-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
No. 892.

#### Hazeltine Corporation *v.*Crosley Corporation.

March 2, 1942.

*Messrs. William H. Davis'*and *R. M. Adams*for petitioner. *Messrs. Samuel E. Darby, Jr.*and *Floyd H. Crews*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Canyon Copper Corp. - Exhibit 10.4






CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE

	EXECUTED BY: 	Canyon Copper Corp. (the "Borrower") 
	 	 
	IN FAVOUR OF: 	Asset Protection Fund Ltd. (the "Lender")

	 	 
	PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: 	$250,000 (U.S.) 
	 	 
	DATE OF EXECUTION: 	September 11, 2006 
	 	 
	PLACE OF EXECUTION: 	Vancouver, BC, Canada 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED the Borrower hereby promises to pay
to or to the order of the Lender on January 11, 2009, the principal sum of
$250,000 (U.S.), together with interest thereon at the rate of 8% per annum,
both before and after maturity from the date hereof.

The Lender may at its option, at any time prior to January 11,
2009, convert all or any portion of the principal sum into that number of
fully-paid and non-assessable shares of common stock of the Borrower (the
“Conversion Shares”) as shall be equal to the principal sum at a conversion rate
which shall be the lesser of $0.30 U.S. per share or the closing price of the
Borrower’s shares for the business day preceding the date that the Borrower
provides notice of conversion hereunder. Upon exercise of the Lender’s
conversion rights hereunder, the Lender shall receive for no additional
consideration one half of a share purchase warrant (each a “Warrant”) for each
Conversion Share issued by the Borrower to the Lender. Each whole Warrant shall
entitle the Lender to purchase one additional share of the Borrower’s common
stock for a period of one year from the date of issuance, at a price of $0.40
per share.

The Borrower waives presentment, demand, notice, protest and
notice of dishonour and all other demands and notices in connection with the
delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of this Promissory
Note.

The Borrower agrees this Promissory Note may be negotiated,
assigned, discounted, or pledged by the Lender and in every case payment will be
made to the holder of this Promissory Note instead of the Lender upon notice
being given by the holder to the undersigned, and no holder of this Promissory
Note will be affected by the state of accounts between the undersigned and the
Lender or by any equities existing between the undersigned and the Lender and
will be deemed to be a holder in due course and for the value of the Promissory
Note held by him.

DATED at Vancouver, BC this 30th day of November, 2007.

CANYON COPPER CORP. 
by its authorized signatory:

/s/ Kurt Bordian

  ________________________________

  Kurt Bordian, Chief Financial Officer
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE

OF MARYLAND

* COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND

v.

* Misc. Docket AG No. 20

OLADIPO AKINWUNMI AKIN

- DEKO * September Term, 20 20

ORDER

Upon consideration of Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action of the Attorney

Grievance Commission of Maryland

, filed pursuant to Maryland Rule s 19

- 737 and 19

- 721

,

Bar Counsel’s Response to this Court’s Show Cause Order entered July 13, 2020, and there

being no resp onse filed by the Respondent, it is this 24th day of September , 20 20

ORDERED

, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, OlaDipo

Akinwunmi Akin

- De k o, be, and hereby is, indefinitely suspended from the practice of law

in the State of Maryland for violations of Rules 1.1, 1.3, 8.1(b) and 8.4(d) ; and it is further

ORDERED , that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of OlaDipo

Akinwunmi Akin

- Deko from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to

the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all

judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19

- 76 1 (b)

.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera

Chief Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby  given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and  552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential  trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals  associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of  personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Kidney Transplant Rejection Mechanism.                    

*Date:*                         November 12, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive,  Bethesda, MD 20817 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Priti Mehrotra, Ph.D, Chief, Immunology Review Branch, Scientific Review Program,  DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS,  6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 3138,  Bethesda, MD 20892-7616,  301-435-9369,                         *pm158b@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation  Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-25288 Filed 10-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P