alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations for Telos Corporation
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000320121
<NAME>                        Telos Corporation
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                            313,000
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                  29,138,000
<ALLOWANCES>                    1,024,000
<INVENTORY>                     5,008,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               39,134,000
<PP&E>                         21,366,000
<DEPRECIATION>                  9,059,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 58,944,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          35,423,000
<BONDS>                        22,069,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          45,922,000
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           78,000
<OTHER-SE>                    (55,738,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   58,944,000
<SALES>                        67,570,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               67,570,000
<CGS>                          57,495,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  57,495,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  194,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              2,363,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (876,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                     (183,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (693,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (693,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0




</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruby SIFUENTES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-20121

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 7, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

John Riley Friesell, Bellaire, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ruby Sifuentes appeals the sentence of eight months of imprisonment to be followed by 28 months of supervised release imposed by the district court following the revocation of her term of supervised release from her conviction for transporting an alien within the country for financial gain. Sifuentes argues that the imposition of the sentence is unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). She also contends that her 28-month term of supervised release and her eight-month prison sentence exceeds the statutory maximum because the total length of her supervised release, including 20 months previously served, will violate the statutory maximum term of 36 months of supervised release.

This court has held that factual findings made by a court in revoking supervised release need not be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the principles of *Apprendi*as developed in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), do not apply to revocations of supervised release. *United States v. Hinson,*429 F.3d 114, 118 (5th Cir.2005), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1804, 164 L.Ed.2d 540 (2006). The argument is without merit.

*478The plain language of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h) allows the district court to impose a term of supervised release upon revocation provided that the term of supervised release does not exceed the term authorized by statute for the underlying offense. § 3583(h). Because Sifuentes was convicted of a Class C felony, the district court was authorized to sentence her to 28 months of supervised release following her eight-month prison sentence received upon revocation. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1324; 18 U.S.C. §§ 3559(a) and 3583(b)(2). Sifuentes’s sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6476] 

*Summary:*                     The Secretary of State certified to the Committees on Appropriation on December 24, 2008 that Libya has met the requirements stipulated in Section 654(b) of the State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act of 2008.                 

Dated: January 2, 2009. 

Jeffrey Feltman, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, Department of State. 

 [FR Doc. E9-126 Filed 1-7-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 24861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12236]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group, Reproduction, Andrology, and 
Gynecology Subcommittee.
    Date: June 22, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Dennis Leszczynski, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-2717. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ce0e9fff6eff6f5e8cce1ede5e0a2e2e5e4a2ebe3fa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="731f16000910090a17331e121a1f5d1d1a1b5d141c05">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 19, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-12236 Filed 5-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael ORANGE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-15957

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 28, 2009.

Michael Orange, Pine Knot, KY, pro se.

David Andrew Sigler, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before MARCUS, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robert F. Clark, appointed counsel for Michael Orange in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Orange’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Books-A-Million, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

 (i)          the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

 (ii)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   | Dated:  April 14, 2008 | /s/ Douglas G. Markham   |
|--------|------------------------|------------------------------------|

|   | Douglas G. Markham |
|--------|--------------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 23




The Board of Directors
Laurel Capital Group, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
33-80798 on Form S-8 of Laurel Capital Group, Inc. of our report dated August 9,
2002, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Laurel
Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiary as of June 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2002, which report is
incorporated by reference in the June 30, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of
Laurel Capital Group, Inc.

                                             KPMG LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
September 30, 2002
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




EAGLE TEST SYSTEMS, INC.

2008 MANAGEMENT BONUS PLAN




1.       Purpose




          This Management Bonus Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) is intended to provide an incentive for
superior work and to motivate eligible executives of Eagle Test Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) and
its subsidiaries toward even higher achievement and business results, to tie their goals and
interests to those of the Company and its stockholders and to enable the Company to attract and
retain highly qualified executives. The Incentive Plan is for the benefit of Covered Executives
(as defined below).




2.       Covered Executives




          From time to time, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the
“Compensation Committee”) may select certain key executives (the “Covered Executives”) to be
eligible to receive bonuses hereunder.




3.       Administration




          The Compensation Committee shall have the sole discretion and authority to administer and
interpret the Incentive Plan.




4.       Bonus Determinations




          (a) A Covered Executive may receive a bonus payment under the Incentive Plan based upon the
attainment of performance targets which are established by the Compensation Committee, in its sole
discretion, and may relate to financial measures with respect to the Company, including operating
income, or any of its subsidiaries, as well as departmental or individual performance goals
(collectively, the “Performance Goals”).




          (b) No bonuses shall be paid to Covered Executives unless and until the Compensation Committee
makes a determination with respect to the attainment of the Performance Goals. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Company may pay bonuses (including, without limitation, discretionary bonuses) to
Covered Executives under the Incentive Plan based upon such other terms and conditions as the
Compensation Committee may in its sole discretion determine.




          (c) Each Covered Executive shall have a targeted bonus opportunity for each performance
period, as determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.




          (d) The payment of a bonus to a Covered Executive with respect to a performance period shall
be conditioned upon the Covered Executive’s employment by the Company on the last day of the
performance period; provided, however, that the Compensation Committee may make
exceptions to this requirement, in its sole discretion, including, without limitation, in the case
of a Covered Executive’s termination of employment, retirement, death or disability.














 








5.       Timing of Measurement




          The Performance Goals will be measured at the end of each fiscal year after the preparation of
the Company’s financial statements for such year is complete.




6.       Amendment and Termination




          The Company reserves the right to amend or terminate the Incentive Plan at any time in its
sole discretion.





2
#### Penguin Group (USA) Inc., Appellant, v American Buddha, Respondent.

Submitted December 13, 2010;

decided January 6, 2011

*See*609 F3d 30.

Motion by Public Citizen for leave to appear amicus curiae on consideration of the certified question herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2677 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 2,2-(6-(4-methoxyphenol)- 

1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diyl)bis(5-((2-ethylhexyl)oxy)phenol). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 2,2-(6- 

(4-methoxyphenol)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diyl)bis(5-((2- 

ethylhexyl)oxy)phenol). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,2-(6-(4-METHOXYPHENOL)-1,3,5-TRIAZINE-2,4- 

4 DIYL)BIS(5-((2-ETHYLHEXYL)OXY)PHENOL). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Headings 2933.69.60 and 

6 9902.25.27 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

7 United States (relating to 2,2-(6-(4-methoxyphenol)-1,3,5- 

8 triazine-2,4-diyl)bis(5-((2-ethylhexyl)oxy)phenol)) is 

9 amended by striking the date in the effective period col10 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2677 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
No. 1012.

#### Southern Steel Co. *v.*Butex Gas Co. et al.

March 30, 1942.

*Mr. S. Austin Wier*for petitioner. *Mr. Ja,ck A. Schley*for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the December
31, 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,693
<SECURITIES>                                 2,727,875
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   227
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,755,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,533,160
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           162
<OTHER-SE>                                     222,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,755,358
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,873
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,980
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   990
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,737
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,737
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,737
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.73
        

</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Grants 
-  Funding Opportunities 

# Farm Business Management and Benchmarking Competitive Grants Program

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

The Farm Business Management and Benchmarking (FBMB) Competitive Grants Program provides funds for improving the farm management knowledge and skills of agricultural producers by maintaining and expanding a national, publicly available farm financial management database to support improved farm management.

The technical assistance webinar related to this FY 2024 funding opportunity will be scheduled soon. Please visit again for more information.

 

Apply For GrantDownload RFATechnical Assistance Webinar

NIFA Language Access Services

Community and Economic Development

Pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 450i(b)(7), eligible applicants means : (A) State agricultural experiment stations; (B) colleges and universities; (C) university research foundations; (D) other research institutions and organizations; (E) Federal agencies; (F) national laboratories; (G) private organizations or corporations; (H) individuals; or (I) any group consisting of 2 or more of the entities described in subparagraphs (A) through (H).

Monday, December 11, 2023

Keith Harris

Wednesday, February 7, 2024

grantapplicationquestions@usda.gov

REEIS Abstract of Funded Projects

FY23-FBMB-RFA-508-F.pdf(pdf - 442.96 KB)

Business and Economics

Farming and Ranching
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7095

ANDRE RAYMOND VINES, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. BRYAN WATSON, Warden, Wallens Ridge State Prison, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge (1:07-cv-01280-CMH-BRP)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 26, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Raymond Vines, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Andre Raymond Vines seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Vines has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. ) ) Under ContractNo. DAAA09-02-D-0007 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58578

Michael R. Chamess, Esq. Craig D. Margolis, Esq. Christine N. Roushdy, Esq.

Vinson & Elkins LLP Washington, DC Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney Kyle E. Chadwick, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL Appellant having filed a request that this appeal be dismissed with prejudice, representing that the parties have reached a settlement, and respondent having agreed to a dismissal, this appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 18 July 2014

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANo. 58578, Appeal ofKellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance withthe Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals